374Water Inc. - Quarter Report: 2010 March (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period ended March 31, 2010

Commission file number: 000-27866

POWERVERDE, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

21615 N. 2^nd Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85027

(Address of principal executive offices)

(623) 780-3321

(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    ¨  Yes    ¨  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    ¨  Yes    x  No

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: As of May 21, 2010 the issuer had 27,716,399 shares of common stock outstanding.

Table of Contents

Index to Form 10-Q

Table of Contents

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

PowerVerde, Inc. and Subsidiary

(A Development Stage Company)

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

1

Table of Contents

PowerVerde, Inc. and Subsidiary

(A Development Stage Company)

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, and the

period from March 9, 2007 (Date of Inception) to March 31, 2010

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

Table of Contents

PowerVerde, Inc. and Subsidiary

(A Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficiency

For the three months ended March 31, 2010

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

PowerVerde, Inc. and Subsidiary

(A Development Stage Company)

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, and the

period from March 9, 2007 (Date of Inception) to March 31, 2010

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

PowerVerde, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2010

Note 1 – Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with instructions for Form 10-Q, include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) which are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the periods presented. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. It is suggested that these condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2009. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PowerVerde, Inc., formerly known as Vyrex Corporation (the “Company”), and PowerVerde Systems, Inc., formerly known as PowerVerde, Inc., its wholly-owned subsidiary. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Note 2 – Going Concern

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has had recurring operating losses and negative cash flows from operations. Those factors, as well as uncertainty in securing additional funds for continued operations, create an uncertainty about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Note 3 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

ASU No. 2009-17, “Consolidations (Topic 810) — Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities.” (“ASU 2009-17”)

ASU 2009-17 amends prior guidance to change how a company determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entity’s purpose and design and a company’s ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. ASU 2009-17 requires additional disclosures about the reporting entity’s involvement with variable-interest entities and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement as well as its affect on the entity’s financial statements. The provisions of ASU 2009-17 became effective on January 1, 2010 and did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

Note 3 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements (Continued)

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements (Continued)

ASU No. 2010-06, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures — Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements” (“ASU 2010-06”)

ASU 2010-06 amends ASC Subtopic 820-10, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures — Overall”, and requires reporting entities to disclose (1) the amount of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers, and (2) separate information about purchases, sales, issuance and settlements in the reconciliation of fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). ASU 2010-06 also requires reporting entities to provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities and disclose the inputs and valuation techniques for fair value measurements that fall within Levels 2 and 3 of the fair value hierarchy. These disclosures and clarification are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuance, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The provisions of ASU 2010-06 became effective on January 1, 2010 and did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

ASU No. 2010-09, “Subsequent Events — Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements” (“ASU 2010-09”)

ASU 2010-09 amends ASC Subtopic 855-10, “Subsequent Events — Overall” (“ASC 855-10”) and requires an SEC filer to evaluate subsequent events through the date that the financial statements are issued but removed the requirement to disclose this date in the notes to the entity’s financial statements. The amendments are effective upon issuance of the final update and accordingly, the Company has adopted the provisions of ASU 2010-09 during the quarter ended March 31, 2010. The adoption of these provisions did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

ASU No. 2009-16, “Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860) — Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets.” (“ASU 2009-16”)

ASU 2009-16 amends prior accounting guidance to enhance reporting about transfers of financial assets, including securitizations, and where companies have continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. ASU 2009-16 eliminates the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity” and changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets. ASU 2009-16 also requires additional disclosures about all continuing involvements with transferred financial assets including information about gains and losses resulting from transfers during the period. The provisions of ASU 2009-16 became effective on January 1, 2010 and did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

ASU No. 2009-13, “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) — Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements (A Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)” (“ASU 2009-13”)

ASU 2009-13 requires the use of the relative selling price method when allocating revenue in these types of arrangements. This method allows a vendor to use its best estimate of selling price if neither vendor specific objective evidence nor third party evidence of selling price exists when evaluating multiple deliverable arrangements. This standard update is effective January 1, 2011 and may be adopted prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after the date of adoption or retrospectively for all revenue arrangements for all periods presented. The Company does not expect that this standard update will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

Note 3 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements (Continued)

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements (Continued)

ASU No. 2009-14, “Software (Topic 985) — Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements (A Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force)” (“ASU 2009-14”)

ASU 2009-14 requires tangible products that contain software and non-software elements that work together to deliver the products essential functionality to be evaluated under the accounting standard regarding multiple deliverable arrangements. This standard update is effective January 1, 2011 and may be adopted prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after the date of adoption or retrospectively for all revenue arrangements for all periods presented. The Company does not expect that this standard update will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

ASU No. 2010-11, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) — Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives.” (“ASU 2010-11”)

ASU 2010-11 clarifies that the only form of an embedded credit derivative that is exempt from embedded derivative bifurcation requirements are those that relate to the subordination of one financial instrument to another. As a result, entities that have contracts containing an embedded credit derivative feature in a form other than such subordination may need to separately account for the embedded credit derivative feature. The provisions of ASU 2010-11 will be effective on July 1, 2010 and are not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2010-13, “Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718) — Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades.” (“ASU 2010-13”)

ASU 2010-13 provides amendments to Topic 718 to clarify that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity’s equity securities trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market, performance, or service condition. Therefore, an entity would not classify such an award as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity. The amendments in ASU 2010-13 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2010 and are not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Note 4 – Stockholders’ Equity

Private Placement of Common Stock

In March 2010, the Company raised $85,000 through the private placement of 113,333 shares of its common stock to accredited investors at $.75 per share. Each investor received a three-year warrant to purchase stock at $.75 per share for a number of shares of common stock equal to the number of shares purchased by the investor in this offering.

Warrants

In 2009, the Company issued warrants to purchase 250,000 and 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at exercise prices of $1.50 and $2.30 per share, respectively. These warrants are still outstanding as of March 31, 2010. The warrants expire on various dates in May 2011 through November 2011.

In March 2010, the Company issued warrants to purchase 113,333 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.75 per share. The warrants expire on various dates through March 2013, and were not exercised as of March 31, 2010.

7

Table of Contents

Note 4 – Stockholders’ Equity (Continued)

Private Placement of Common Stock (Continued)

A summary of warrants issued, exercised and expired during the three months ended March 31, 2010 is as follows:

Forward Looking Statements

Readers are cautioned that the statements in this Report that are not descriptions of historical facts may be forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. This Report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs of our management, as well as on assumptions made by and information currently available to us as of the date of this Report. When used in this Report, the words “plan,” “will,” “may,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “project” and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Although we believe these statements are reasonable, actual actions, operations and results could differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements as a result of the risk factors included in our 2009 Annual Report, or other factors. We must caution, however, that this list of factors may not be exhaustive and that these or other factors, many of which are outside of our control, could have a material adverse effect on us and our ability to achieve our objectives. All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements set forth above.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein.

Critical Accounting Policies

The consolidated financial statements of PowerVerde, Inc. are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires our management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that effect the amounts reported in the financial statements and related notes. Future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty. Therefore, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of financial statements.

Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes

The Company adopted the accounting standard regarding “Accounting for Uncertain Tax Positions” which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements, and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The standard also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.

8

Table of Contents

Based on our evaluation, we have concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in our financial statements. Our evaluation was performed for the tax years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009, the tax years which remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions as of March 31 2010.

We may from time to time be assessed interest or penalties by major tax jurisdictions, although any such assessments historically have been minimal and immaterial to our financial results. In the event we have received an assessment for interest and/or penalties, it has been classified in the financial statements as selling, general and administrative expense.

Revenue Recognition

Licensing and royalty revenue from royalty agreements is recognized in accordance with the terms of the specific agreement, which generally includes a quarterly minimum payment by the licensee.

Common Stock Purchase Warrants

The Company accounts for common stock purchase warrants in accordance with ASC Topic 815-40, “Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity” (“ASC 815-40”). Based on the provisions of ASC 815-40, the Company classifies as equity any contracts that (i) require physical settlement or net-share settlement, or (ii) gives the Company a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). The Company classifies as assets or liabilities any contracts that (i) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the control of the Company), or (ii) give the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement).

Overview

From January 1991 until October 2005, the Company devoted substantially all of its efforts and resources to research and development related to its unsuccessful Biotech Business, in particular the study of biological oxidation and antioxidation directed to the development of potential therapeutic products for the treatment of various diseases and conditions. In the most recent years, the Company’s research focused mainly on targeted antioxidant therapeutics and nutraceuticals. The Company is a development stage company, has never generated any substantial revenue from product sales and has relied primarily on equity financing, licensing revenues, and various debt instruments for its working capital. The Company has been unprofitable since its inception.

Following the cessation of material Biotech Business operations in October 2005, the Company turned its primary focus to seeking an appropriate merger partner for its public shell. This resulted in the February 2008 Merger with Vyrex. In March 2009, we assigned our Biotech IP to an investor in exchange for his agreement to pay all future expenses relating to the Biotech IP and to pay us 20% of any net proceeds received from sale and/or licensing of the Biotech IP. We do not expect this arrangement to generate material revenues.

The Company’s business is subject to significant risks, including the risks inherent in our research and development efforts, uncertainties associated with obtaining and enforcing patents and intense competition.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 as Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2009

Since inception, we have focused on the development and testing of our clean energy electric power generation systems. We had no material revenues in the first quarter of 2010 or 2009 – just $13,047 and $3,384 in Biotech IP licensing fees in 2010 and 2009, respectively — while we had substantial expenses due to our ongoing research and development activities, as well as substantial administrative expenses, including those associated with our status as a public company. Our net loss in the first quarter of 2010 and 2009 was $95,308 and $194,093, respectively. Substantial net losses will continue unless and until we are able to successfully commercialize and market our products, as to which there can be no assurance.

9

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have financed our operations since inception through the sale of debt and equity securities. As of March 31, 2010, we had a working capital deficit of $141,083 compared to a working capital deficit of $123,692 at December 31, 2009. Our efforts to raise additional capital since the second half of 2008 have been severely hampered by the ongoing financial crisis and the resulting recession and weak recovery, which have severely damaged the U.S. and global economies and caused substantial drops in the prices of oil and natural gas.

In March 2010, we raised gross proceeds of $85,000 through the private placement of 113,333 shares of our common stock to accredited investors at $.75 per share. Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 incorrectly stated that the gross proceeds of this offering were $110,000. Each investor received a three-year warrant to purchase stock at $.75 per share for a number of shares of common stock equal to the number of shares purchased by the investor in this offering. We paid a 10% commission on the gross proceeds of this offering to our placement agent, Martinez-Ayme Securities.

We continue to seek more funding from private debt and equity investors, as well as governmental sources, as we will need to raise substantial additional capital in order to finance our plan of operations. T here can be no assurance that we will be able to raise the necessary funds. If we do not raise the necessary funds, we will be forced to cease operations.

Not applicable.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including the Chief Executive Officer and President, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this Report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no significant changes in internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

10

Table of Contents

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

None.

There are no material changes to the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of the 2009 Annual Report. Please refer to that section for disclosure regarding the risks and uncertainties related to our business.

In March 2010, we raised $85,000 through the private placement of 113,333 shares of our common stock to accredited investors at $.75 per share. Each investor received a three-year warrant to purchase stock at $.75 per share for a number of shares of common stock equal to the number of shares purchased by the investor in this offering.

None.

None.

11

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: May 24, 2010

12

Table of Contents

Exhibit Index

13