ABEONA THERAPEUTICS INC. - Quarter Report: 2010 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
DC 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
þ
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the Quarterly Period Ended March 31,
2010
OR
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the Transition Period from to
Commission
file number 0-9314
ACCESS PHARMACEUTICALS,
INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 83-0221517 | |||
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer I.D. No.) | |||
incorporation or organization) |
2600 Stemmons Frwy, Suite 176, Dallas, TX
75207
(Address
of principal executive offices)
(214)
905-5100
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
þ No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting company þ
|
|||
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting
company)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
As of May
14, 2010, there were 15,454,839 shares of Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. common
stock outstanding. Also, as of May 14, 2010, there were 2,985.3617 shares of
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding, and such shares were
convertible into 9,951,198 shares of common stock.
ACCESS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. | ||||
INDEX | ||||
Page No. | ||||
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
||||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements:
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2010
|
||||
(unaudited)
and December 31, 2009
|
12
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the
|
||||
three
months ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009
|
13
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit
(unaudited)
|
||||
for
the three months ended March 31, 2010
|
14
|
|||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the
|
||||
three
months ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009
|
15
|
|||
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
16
|
|||
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
|
|||
Results
of Operations
|
2
|
|||
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
7
|
||
Item
4T.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
7
|
||
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
|
||||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
8
|
||
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
8
|
||
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Under Senior Securities
|
8
|
||
Item
4.
|
Removed
and Reserved
|
9
|
||
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
9
|
||
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
9
|
||
SIGNATURES
|
11
|
|||
CERTIFICATIONS
|
1
PART
I –FINANCIAL INFORMATION
This
Quarterly Report (including the information incorporated by reference) contains
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, that involve risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to
the uncertainties associated with research and development activities, clinical
trials, our ability to raise capital, the timing of and our ability to achieve
regulatory approvals, dependence on others to market our licensed products,
collaborations, future cash flow, the timing and receipt of licensing and
milestone revenues, the future success of our marketed products and products in
development, our sales projections, and the sales projections of our licensing
partners, our ability to achieve licensing milestones and other risks described
below as well as those discussed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report, documents
incorporated by reference and other documents and reports that we file
periodically with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These statements
include, without limitation, statements relating to our ability to continue as a
going concern, anticipated product approvals and timing thereof, product
opportunities, clinical trials and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”)
applications, as well as our drug development strategy, our clinical development
organization, expectations regarding our rate of technological developments and
competition, our expectations regarding minimizing development risk and
developing and introducing technology, the size of our targeted markets, the
terms of future licensing arrangements, our plans to hire additional accounting
staff and implement appropriate procedures, the adequacy of our capital
resources, and our ability to secure additional financing for our operations.
These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. In
some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as
“may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “could,” “anticipates,” “believes,”
“estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of such terms
or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and
involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause
our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or
achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels or
activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements.
Although
we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are
reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance
or achievements. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking
statements after the date of filing this Quarterly Report to conform such
statements to actual results.
ITEM
1. FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
The
response to this Item is submitted as a separate section of this
report.
ITEM
2.
|
MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
OVERVIEW
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (together with our subsidiaries, “we”, “Access” or the
“Company”) is a Delaware corporation. We are an emerging biopharmaceutical
company focused on developing a range of pharmaceutical products primarily based
upon our nanopolymer chemistry technologies and other drug delivery
technologies. We currently have one approved product, two products at Phase 2 of
clinical development and several products in pre-clinical development. Low
priority clinical and pre-clinical programs will be dependent on our ability to
enter into collaborative arrangements. Certain of our development programs are
dependent upon our ability to secure approved funding for such projects. Our
description of our business, including our list of products and patents, takes
into consideration our acquisition of MacroChem Corporation which closed
February 25, 2009.
2
·
|
MuGard™
is our approved product for the management of oral mucositis, a frequent
side-effect of cancer therapy for which there is no established treatment.
The market for mucositis treatment is estimated to be in excess of $1
billion world-wide. MuGard, a proprietary nanopolymer formulation, has
received marketing allowance in the U.S. from the Food & Drug
Administration (FDA). MuGard has been launched in Germany, Italy, UK,
Greece and the Nordic countries by our European commercial partner,
SpePharm. Our manufacturing of MuGard is underway as we expect to launch
MuGard in North America during the second quarter of 2010. We are working
with our partners in Korea and China for
marketing.
|
·
|
Our
lead development candidate for the treatment of cancer is ProLindac™, a
nanopolymer DACH-platinum prodrug. We recently completed a Phase 2
clinical trial on ProLindac in the EU in patients with recurrent ovarian
cancer. The clinical study had positive safety and efficacy results. On
January 7, 2010, we announced that we are initiating a study of ProLindac
combined with Paclitaxel in second line treatment of platinum pretreated
advanced ovarian cancer patients. This multi-center study of up to 25
evaluable patients will be conducted in Europe. We are also currently
planning a number of combination trials, looking at combining ProLindac
with other cancer agents in solid tumor indications including colorectal
and ovarian cancer. The DACH-platinum incorporated in ProLindac is the
same active moiety as that in oxaliplatin (Eloxatin; Sanofi-Aventis),
which has sales in excess of $2.0
billion.
|
·
|
Thiarabine,
or 4-thio Ara-C, is a next generation nucleoside analog licensed from
Southern Research Institute. Previously named SR9025 and OSI-7836, the
compound has been in two Phase 1/2 solid tumor human clinical trials and
was shown to have anti-tumor activity. We are working with leukemia and
lymphoma specialists at MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston and intend to
initiate additional Phase 2 clinical trials in adult AML, ALL and other
indications.
|
·
|
Cobalamin™
is our proprietary preclinical nanopolymer oral drug delivery technology
based on the natural vitamin B12 oral uptake mechanism. We are currently
developing a product for the oral delivery of insulin, and have conducted
sponsored development of a product for oral delivery of human growth
hormone. We are in discussion with several companies regarding the
sponsored development of Cobalamin oral drug delivery formulations of
proprietary and non-proprietary
actives.
|
·
|
Cobalamin-mediated
cancer targeted delivery is a preclinical technology which makes use of
the fact that cell surface receptors for vitamins such as B12 are often
overexpressed by cancer cells. This technology uses nanopolymer constructs
to deliver more anti-cancer drug to tumors while protecting normal
tissues.
|
Products
We use
our drug delivery technologies to develop the following products and product
candidates:
3
Access
Drug Portfolio
Compound
|
Originator
|
Technology
|
Indication
|
Clinical
Stage (1)
|
||||
MuGard™
|
Access
|
Mucoadhesive
liquid
|
Mucositis
|
(510k)
Marketing clearance received
|
||||
ProLindacTM
(Polymer
Platinate,
AP5346) (2)
|
Access
/
Univ
of
London
|
Synthetic
polymer
|
Cancer
|
Phase
2
|
||||
Thiarabine
(4-thio Ara-C) (3)
|
Southern
Research
Institute
|
Small
molecule
|
Cancer
|
Phase
1/2
|
||||
Oral
Insulin
|
Access
|
Cobalamin
|
Diabetes
|
Pre-clinical
|
||||
Oral
Delivery System
|
Access
|
Cobalamin
|
Various
|
Pre-clinical
|
||||
Cobalamin™-Targeted
Therapeutics
|
Access
|
Cobalamin
|
Anti-tumor
|
Pre-clinical
|
(1)
|
For
more information, see “Government Regulation” in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for description of clinical
stages.
|
(2)
|
Licensed
from the School of Pharmacy, The University of
London.
|
(3)
|
Licensed
from Southern Research Institute of Birmingham,
Alabama.
|
RECENT
EVENTS
On April
13, 2010, we announced that we had completed our first commercial scale
production run of MuGard in North America at Accupac, Inc. manufacturing
facilities.
On March
30, 2010, we announced that we signed a collaborative development agreement with
bioRASI, LLC to facilitate clinical development for our Cobalamin based oral
insulin and Cobalamin based products.
On March
25, 2010, we announced that our Korean partner JCOM co., Ltd. received approval
from the Korean Food and Drug Administration of its Registration Dossier for
MuGard.
On March
11, 2010, we announced that we had received reports of significant
bioavailability of orally delivered insulin in two independently-conducted
animal studies with our Cobalamin™ Oral Drug Delivery Technology.
On
January 22, 2010, we announced the sale of approximately 2.10 million shares of
our common stock and warrants to purchase approximately 1.05 million shares of
our common stock for gross proceeds of approximately $6.3 million. We sold these
shares and warrants as a combined unit for $3.00 per unit (each unit consisting
of one share and a warrant to purchase 0.5 shares of common stock). The exercise
price of the warrants is $3.00 per share.
On
January 7, 2010, we announced that we completed enrollment and evaluation of the
last additional cohort of patients in the ongoing clinical study of ProLindac as
a monotherapy in ovarian cancer patients who received at least two prior
platinum based treatment regimens. The additional cohort of 8 patients received
the ProLindac batch made by an improved scalable process, which will be used on
a larger scale for future clinical and commercial supplies. None of the 8
patients experienced any acute significant adverse events, while treatment had
the same beneficial pharmacodynamic effect seen in the first 26 patients treated
with the former ProLindac production batch; clinically relevant sustained
biomarker decrease (responses by Rustin's criteria) and disease stabilization
were seen in several patients. The overall results of our Phase 1/2 exploratory
single agent ProLindac study have helped define multiple safe dosing regimens,
while the level of patient cohort accrued in the study antitumor activity was as
expected in this very heavily pretreated patient cohort.
4
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We have
funded our operations primarily through private sales of common stock, preferred
stock, convertible notes and through licensing agreements. Our principal source
of liquidity is cash and cash equivalents. Royalty revenues provided limited
funding for operations during the quarter ended March 31, 2010. As of March 31,
2010, our cash and cash equivalents were $4,278,000 and our net cash burn rate
for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, was approximately $585,000 per month,
which included non-recurring manufacturing expenses. As of March 31, 2010, our
working capital deficit was $4,186,000. Our working capital deficit at March 31,
2010 represented a decrease of $3,763,000 as compared to our working capital
deficit as of December 31, 2009 of $7,949,000. The decrease in the working
capital deficit at March 31, 2010 reflects net receipts from our January 2010
offering of $5,848,000 offset by the first quarter operating costs. As of March
31, 2010, we had one convertible note outstanding in the principal amount of
$5.5 million which is due September 13, 2011.
As of May
14, 2010, we did not have enough capital to achieve our long-term goals. If we
raise additional funds by selling equity securities, the relative equity
ownership of our existing investors will be diluted and the new investors could
obtain terms more favorable than previous investors. A failure to obtain
necessary additional capital in the future could jeopardize our operations and
our ability to continue as a going concern.
We have
generally incurred negative cash flows from operations since inception, and have
expended, and expect to continue to expend in the future, substantial funds to
complete our planned product development efforts. Since inception, our expenses
have significantly exceeded revenues, resulting in an accumulated deficit as of
March 31, 2010 of $241,160,000. We expect that our capital resources will be
adequate to fund our current level of operations into the first quarter of 2011.
However, our ability to fund operations over this time could change
significantly depending upon changes to future operational funding obligations
or capital expenditures. As a result, we are required to seek additional
financing sources within the next twelve months. We cannot assure you that we
will ever be able to generate significant product revenue or achieve or sustain
profitability.
Since our
inception, we have devoted our resources primarily to fund our research and
development programs. We have been unprofitable since inception and to date have
received limited revenues from the sale of products. We cannot assure you that
we will be able to generate sufficient product revenues to attain profitability
on a sustained basis or at all. We expect to incur losses for the next several
years as we continue to invest in product research and development, preclinical
studies, clinical trials and regulatory compliance.
FIRST
QUARTER 2010 COMPARED TO FIRST QUARTER 2009
Our
licensing revenue for the first quarter of 2010 was $87,000 as compared to
$41,000 for 2009, an increase of $46,000. We recognize licensing revenue over
the period of the performance obligation under our licensing
agreements.
We
received royalties of $15,000 in the first quarter of 2010 as compared to no
royalties for the same period in 2009. Royalties for MuGard were first recorded
in the third quarter of 2009.
5
Total
research and development spending for the first quarter of 2010 was $786,000, as
compared to $687,000 for 2009, an increase of $99,000. The increase in expenses
was primarily due to:
·
|
increased
costs for clinical development as we prepared to start our new ProLindac
combination therapy clinical
trial ($80,000);
|
·
|
increased
costs for our internal lab costs for various trials
($48,000);
|
·
|
increased
stock option expenses due to new employees
($36,000);
|
·
|
increased
salary and related costs due to a new employee
($33,000);
|
·
|
other
net increases in research spending
($31,000);
|
·
|
offset
by lower costs for product manufacturing for ProLindac which were higher
in 2009 ($65,000); and
|
·
|
offset
by lower scientific consulting expenses
($64,000).
|
Total
general and administrative expenses were $898,000 for the first quarter of 2010,
a decrease of $349,000 compared to 2009 expenses of $1,247,000 for the same
quarter. The decrease in expenses was due primarily to the
following:
·
|
lower
accrual of potential liquidated damages under an investor rights agreement
with certain investors
($158,000);
|
·
|
lower
general and administrative expenses incurred by MacroChem in the first
quarter of 2009 that are no longer ongoing
($135,000);
|
·
|
lower
general business consulting expenses
($110,000);
|
·
|
offset
by higher professional fees ($55,000);
and
|
·
|
other
net decreases in general and administrative expenses
($1,000).
|
Depreciation
and amortization was $61,000 for the first quarter of 2010, as compared to
$66,000 for 2009, a decrease of $5,000. The decrease in expenses was primarily
due to assets becoming fully depreciated.
Total
operating expenses for the first quarter of 2010, were $1,745,000 as compared to
total operating expenses of $2,000,000 for same period in 2009, a decrease of
$255,000 for the reasons listed above.
Interest
and miscellaneous income was $4,000 for the first quarter of 2010, as compared
to $14,000 for the same period in 2009, a decrease of $10,000. The decrease in
interest and miscellaneous income was due to lower average cash balances during
2010 versus 2009.
Interest
and other expense was $149,000 for the first quarter of 2010, as compared to
$144,000 in 2009, an increase of $5,000. The increase in interest and other
expense was due to the interest due on the unpaid portion of the long-term notes
and dividends.
We
recorded derivative gain of $2,877,000 for the first quarter of 2010. A
derivative was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2009 when the fair
value of the warrants, that were issued with the Series A Convertible Preferred
Stock, were reclassified from equity to a liability per the requirements of new
accounting guidance. Although we were required, per the guidance, to adopt this
guidance effective January 1, 2009, there was no derivative liability recorded
in the first quarter of 2009. If a derivative was recorded in the first quarter
of 2009 there would have been a derivative loss of $2,104,000.
6
Preferred
stock dividends of $442,000 were accrued for the first quarter of 2010 and
$480,000 for 2009, a decrease of $38,000. The decrease is due to preferred
shareholders converting their ownership to common stock. Dividends are paid
semi-annually in either cash or common stock.
Net
income allocable to common stockholders for the first quarter of 2010, was
$647,000, or a $0.04 basic and $0.04 diluted earnings per common share, compared
with a loss of $2,569,000, or a $0.24 basic and diluted loss per common share
for the same period in 2009, an increase of $3,216,000.
ITEM
3.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
|
Not
applicable.
ITEM
4T. CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
Under the
supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”)) as of March 31, 2010. Based on this
evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that, as of March 31, 2010, our disclosure
controls and procedures were not effective. This conclusion was based on the
existence of the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial
reporting previously disclosed and discussed below.
Our
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined
in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Our internal control
system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because
of inherent limitations, a system of internal control over financial reporting
may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate due to change in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with
the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Our
management, including our principal executive officer and principal accounting
officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting using the criteria set forth by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework. Based on its evaluation, our management concluded
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 that
there is a material weakness in our internal control over financial
reporting. As of the date of this report on Form 10-Q, we have not
remediated such material weakness and as a result, our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that a material weakness
continues to exist as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q and our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective. The
material weakness identified did not result in the restatement of any previously
reported financial statements or any related financial disclosure, nor does
management believe that it had any effect on the accuracy of the Company’s
financial statements for the current reporting period. A material weakness is a
deficiency, or a combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over
financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material
misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be
prevented or detected on a timely basis.
7
The
material weakness relates to the monitoring and review of work performed by our
Chief Financial Officer in the preparation of financial statements, footnotes
and financial data provided to the Company’s registered public accounting firm
in connection with the annual audit. All of our financial reporting is carried
out by our Chief Financial Officer. This lack of accounting staff results in a
lack of segregation of duties and accounting technical expertise necessary for
an effective system of internal control.
In order
to mitigate this material weakness to the fullest extent possible, all financial
statements are reviewed by the Chief Executive Officer as well as the Chairman
of the Audit Committee for reasonableness. All unexpected results are
investigated. At any time, if it appears that any control can be implemented to
continue to mitigate such weaknesses, it is immediately implemented. As soon as
our finances allow, we plan to hire sufficient accounting staff and implement
appropriate procedures for monitoring and review of work performed by our Chief
Financial Officer.
Changes In Internal Control
Over Financial Reporting
There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 that have materially affected, or are
reasonable likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
PART
II -- OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
None.
ITEM
2.
|
UNREGISTERED
SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
|
During
the first quarter of 2010 we issued 66,667 shares Access common stock to a
consultant for his consulting fees. The issuance of shares of our common stock
in settlement of these accounts was made pursuant to Section 4(2) and Rule 506
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
During
the first quarter of 2010 we also issued 6,250 shares Access common stock to an
employee as required for his employment agreement. The issuance of shares of our
common stock in settlement of these accounts was made pursuant to Section 4(2)
and Rule 506 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
ITEM
3. DEFAULTS
UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
8
Pursuant
to the terms of the Certificate of Designations, Rights and Preferences of our
Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, we are required to pay
dividends in cash or shares of our common stock, semi-annually, at the rate of
6% per annum. If funds are not currently available to pay cash dividends or if a
cash payment of dividends would be impermissible under Delaware law, we may in
certain circumstances pay such dividends in shares of the Company’s common
stock. In order to pay such dividends in shares of the Company’s common stock,
there must either be an effective registration statement covering the resale of
the dividend shares, the resale must be permissible subject to an exemption from
registration, or the respective holders of Series A Preferred Stock must agree
to accept restricted common stock as payment of such dividends. In the event
none of these three circumstances are met, and the dividends have not been paid
in cash or shares of the Company’s common stock, the dividends shall continue to
accrue until they are paid in cash or shares of the Company’s common stock. The
Company has accrued as of March 31, 2010, dividends payable in the aggregate
amount of $3,254,000.
Pursuant
to the terms of an Investor Rights Agreement with the Purchasers of Series A
Preferred Stock, the Company is required to maintain an effective registration
statement with respect to certain shares issuable upon conversion of our
outstanding preferred stock. As of March 31, 2010, the Securities and Exchange
Commission had not yet declared a registration statement effective with respect
to all of the shares covered by the Investor Rights Agreement, and as a result,
we accrued $857,000 in liquidated damages as of March 31, 2010. A registration
statement filed by Access relating to a portion of such securities was declared
effective on November 13, 2008.
ITEM
4. REMOVED
AND RESERVED
ITEM
5. OTHER
INFORMATION
None
ITEM
6.
|
EXHIBITS
|
Exhibits:
2.2
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, by and among Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Somanta Acquisition Corporation, Somanta
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Somanta Incorporated and Somanta Limited, dated
April 18, 2007. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to our Form 8-K
dated April 18, 2007)
|
2.3
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, by and among Access Pharmaceuticals,
Inc., MACM Acquisition Corporation and MacroChem Corporation, dated July
9, 2008.
|
3.0 Articles
of incorporation and bylaws:
3.1
|
Certificate
of Incorporation (Incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 3(a) of our Form
8-B dated July 12, 1989, Commission File Number
9-9134)
|
3.2 Certificate
of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation filed August 21, 1992
9
3.3
|
Certificate
of Merger filed January 25, 1996. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit E
of our Registration Statement on Form S-4 dated December 21, 1995,
Commission File No. 33-64031)
|
3.4
|
Certificate
of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation filed January 25, 1996.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit E of our Registration Statement on
Form S-4 dated December 21, 1995, Commission File No.
33-64031)
|
3.5
|
Certificate
of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation filed July 18, 1996.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.8 of our Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1996)
|
3.6
|
Certificate
of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation filed June 18, 1998.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.8 of our Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 1998)
|
3.7
|
Certificate
of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation filed July 31, 2000.
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.8 of our Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2001)
|
3.8
|
Certificate
of Designations of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock filed
November 7, 2001 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1.h of our
Registration Statement on Form S-8, dated December 14, 2001, Commission
File No. 333-75136)
|
3.9
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
1996)
|
3.10
|
Certificate
of Designations, Rights and Preferences of Series A Cumulative Convertible
Preferred Stock (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.10 to our Form
10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007)
|
3.11
|
Certificate
of Amendment to Certificate of Designations, Rights and Preferences of
Series A Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock filed June 11, 2008 (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.11 of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2008)
|
10.1
|
Form
of Securities Purchase Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.29 of our Form S-1 filed on January 15,
2010)
|
10.2
|
Form
of Warrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of our Form S-1
filed on January 15, 2010)
|
10.3†
|
Employment
Agreement of David P. Nowotnik, PhD (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.31 of our Form 8-K February 8,
2010)
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer of Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer of Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
|
32.1*
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer of Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350
|
32.2*
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer of Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350
|
* This
exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section,
nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filings under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, whether made
before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation
language in any filings.
†Management contract or compensatory plan required to be filed as an Exhibit to this Form pursuant to Item 6 of the report.
10
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
ACCESS PHARMACEUTICALS,
INC.
Date:
|
May 17, 2010 |
|
By:
|
/s/ Jeffrey B. Davis |
|
|
Jeffrey
B. Davis
|
||||||
Chief
Executive Officer
|
||||||
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
||||||
Date:
|
May 17, 2009 |
|
By:
|
/s/ Stephen B. Thompson |
|
|
Stephen
B. Thompson
|
||||||
Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer
|
||||||
(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer
|
||||||
11
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets
ASSETS
|
March 31, 2010
(unaudited)
|
December 31,
2009
|
|
Current
assets
Cash and cash
equivalents
Receivables
Prepaid expenses and other
current assets
|
$ 4,278,000
35,000
50,000
|
$ 607,000
36,000
42,000
|
|
Total current assets |
4,363,000
|
685,000
|
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
42,000
|
50,000
|
|
Patents,
net
|
734,000
|
787,000
|
|
Other
assets
|
56,000
|
61,000
|
|
Total
assets
|
$ 5,195,000
|
$ 1,583,000
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
|
|||
Current
liabilities
Accounts
payable
Accrued
expenses
Dividends
payable
Accrued
interest payable
Current
portion of deferred revenue
|
$ 3,859,000
857,000
3,254,000
232,000
347,000
|
$ 4,094,000
857,000
2,773,000
563,000
347,000
|
|
Total current liabilities |
8,549,000
|
8,634,000
|
|
Derivative
liability
Long-term
deferred revenue
Long-term
debt
|
6,831,000
4,644,000
5,500,000
|
9,708,000
4,730,000
5,500,000
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
25,524,000
|
28,572,000
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|||
Stockholders'
deficit
Convertible
Series A preferred stock - $.01 par value; authorized
2,000,000
shares; 2,985.3617 shares issued at March 31, 2010
and
2,992.3617 shares issued at December 31, 2009
Common
stock - $.01 par value; authorized 100,000,000 shares;
issued,
15,380,672 at March 31, 2010 and 13,171,545 at
December
31, 2009
Additional
paid-in capital
Notes
receivable from stockholders
Treasury
stock, at cost – 163 shares
Accumulated
deficit
|
-
154,000
221,726,000
(1,045,000)
(4,000)
(241,160,000)
|
-
132,000
215,735,000
(1,045,000)
(4,000)
(241,807,000)
|
|
Total stockholders' deficit |
(20,329,000)
|
(26,989,000)
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit
|
$ 5,195,000
|
$ 1,583,000
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
statements.
12
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
Three Months ended March
31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Revenues
|
||||||||
License
revenues
|
$ | 87,000 | $ | 41,000 | ||||
Royalties
|
15,000 | - | ||||||
Total revenues
|
102,000 | 41,000 | ||||||
Expenses
|
||||||||
Research and
development
|
786,000 | 687,000 | ||||||
General and
administrative
|
898,000 | 1,247,000 | ||||||
Depreciation and
amortization
|
61,000 | 66,000 | ||||||
Total
expenses
|
1,745,000 | 2,000,000 | ||||||
Loss
from operations
|
(1,643,000 | ) | (1,959,000 | ) | ||||
Interest
and miscellaneous income
|
4,000 | 14,000 | ||||||
Interest
and other expense
|
(149,000 | ) | (144,000 | ) | ||||
Gain
on change in fair value of derivative
|
2,877,000 | - | ||||||
2,732,000 | (130,000 | ) | ||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
1,089,000 | (2,089,000 | ) | |||||
Less
preferred stock dividends
|
442,000 | 480,000 | ||||||
Net
income (loss) allocable to common stockholders
|
$ | 647,000 | $ | (2,569,000 | ) | |||
Net
income (loss) per share
Basic
|
$
|
0.04
|
$
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|||
Diluted
|
$ |
0.04
|
$ |
(0.24
|
)
|
|||
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding
Basic
|
14,766,947
|
10,497,219
|
||||||
Diluted |
17,756,979
|
10,497,219
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
statements.
13
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Deficit
(unaudited)
Common Stock
|
Preferred Stock
|
Notes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Additional
paid-in
capital
|
receivable
from stockholders
|
Treasury
stock
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
December 31, 2009
|
13,172,000 | $ | 132,000 | 2,992.3617 | $ | - | $ | 215,735,000 | $ | (1,045,000 | ) | $ | (4,000 | ) | $ | (241,807,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Restricted
common
stock
issued for services
|
73,000 | 1,000 | - | - | 17,000 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warrants
issued for
services
|
- | - | - | - | 19,000 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred
stock converted into common stock
|
23,000 | - | (7.0000 | ) | - | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
option
compensation
expense
|
- | - | - | - | 114,000 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issued
for
cash exercise of
options
|
10,000 | - | - | - | 14,000 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issued
for
cashless warrant
exercise
|
20,000 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock issued
$3.00
share, net of costs
|
2,083,000 | 21,000 | - | - | 5,827,000 | - | - | - | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred
dividends
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | (442,000 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
income
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1,089,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at March 31, 2010
|
15,381,000 | $ | 154,000 | 2,985.3617 | $ | - | $ | 221,726,000 | $ | (1,045,000 | ) | $ | (4,000 | ) | $ | (241,160,000 | ) |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
statements.
14
Access
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
Three Months ended March
31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | 1,089,000 | $ | (2,089,000 | ) | |||
Adjustments to
reconcile net income (loss) to cash used
in
operating activities:
|
||||||||
Gain on change in fair value of
derivative
|
(2,877,000 | ) | - | |||||
Depreciation and
amortization
|
61,000 | 66,000 | ||||||
Stock option compensation
expense
|
114,000 | 56,000 | ||||||
Stock and warrants issued for
services
|
37,000 | 157,000 | ||||||
Change in operating assets and
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Receivables
|
1,000 | 17,000 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
(8,000 | ) | 49,000 | |||||
Other
assets
|
5,000 | 4,000 | ||||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
(235,000 | ) | (157,000 | ) | ||||
Dividends
payable
|
39,000 | (149,000 | ) | |||||
Accrued
interest payable
|
(331,000 | ) | 132,000 | |||||
Deferred
revenue
|
(86,000 | ) | 1,442,000 | |||||
Net cash used in operating
activities
|
(2,191,000 | ) | (472,000 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
- | (2,000 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sale of
asset
|
- | 1,000 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
- | (1,000 | ) | |||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of
stock options
|
14,000 | - | ||||||
Proceeds
from common stock issuances, net of costs
|
5,848,000 | - | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing
activities
|
5,862,000 | - | ||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
3,671,000 | (473,000 | ) | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
607,000 | 2,679,000 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 4,278,000 | $ | 2,206,000 | ||||
Supplemental
cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid for interest
|
$ | 440,000 | $ | - | ||||
Supplemental
disclosure of noncash transactions:
|
||||||||
Shares issued for payables,
notes payable and accrued interest
|
- | 859,000 | ||||||
Shares issued for dividends on
preferred stock
|
- | 856,000 | ||||||
Preferred
stock dividends in dividends payable
|
442,000 | 480,000 | ||||||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
statements.
15
Access Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and
Subsidiaries
Notes to
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(unaudited)
(1)
|
Interim
Financial Statements
|
The
consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2010, and the consolidated statements
of operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009,
were prepared by management without audit. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, except as
otherwise disclosed, necessary for the fair presentation of the financial
position, results of operations, and changes in financial position for such
periods, have been made.
Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America have been condensed or omitted. It is suggested that
these interim financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. The results of operations for the
period ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the operating
results which may be expected for a full year. The consolidated balance sheet as
of December 31, 2009 contains financial information taken from the audited
Access financial statements as of that date.
The
report of our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2009, contained a fourth explanatory paragraph to reflect its
significant doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern as a result
of our history of losses and our liquidity position, as discussed herein and in
this Form 10-Q. We expect that our capital resources and expected receipts due
under our license agreements will be adequate to fund our current level of
operations into the first quarter of 2011. If we are unable to obtain adequate
capital funding in the future or enter into future license agreements for our
products, we may not be able to continue as a going concern, which would have an
adverse effect on our business and operations, and investors’ investment in us
may decline.
On
February 25, 2009, we closed our acquisition of MacroChem Corporation through
the issuance of an aggregate of approximately 2.5 million shares of our common
stock. Prior to our acquisition of MacroChem, SCO, an investment company, held a
majority of Access’ and MacroChem’s voting stock. Specifically, SCO
owned 53% of the voting stock of Access and 63% of the voting stock of
MacroChem. A non-controlling interest of 37% existed at the merger date of
MacroChem. In addition, certain members of SCO’s management serve on the board
of directors of both Access and MacroChem. Based on these facts, Access and
MacroChem were deemed under the common control of SCO. As the entities were
deemed under common control, the acquisition was recorded similar to the
pooling-of-interest method and the financial information for all periods
presented reflects the financial statements of the combined companies in
accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board standards on business
combinations for entities under common control.
16
(2) Intangible Assets
Intangible
assets consist of the following (in thousands):
March
31, 2010
|
December
31, 2009
|
|||
Gross
carrying
value
|
Accumulated
amortization
|
Gross
carrying
value
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
|
Amortizable
intangible assets
Patents
|
$ 2,624
|
$ 1,890
|
$ 2,624
|
$ 1,837
|
Amortization
expense related to intangible assets totaled $53,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and totaled $53,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
The aggregate estimated amortization expense for intangible assets remaining as
of March 31, 2010 is as follows (in thousands):
2010 | $ 159 | |
2011 | 212 | |
2012 | 82 | |
2013 | 44 | |
2014 | 44 | |
over 5 years | 193 | |
Total | $ 734 |
(3) Liquidity
The Company generated net income allocable to common
stockholders of $647,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and a loss of
$19,226,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009. At March 31, 2010, our working
capital deficit was $4,186,000. We expect that our capital resources and
receipts due under our license agreements will be adequate to fund our current
level of operations into the first quarter of 2011. However, our ability to fund
operations over this time could change significantly depending upon changes to
future operational funding obligations or capital expenditures. As a result we
will be required to seek additional financing sources and enter into future
licensing agreements for our products. If we are unable to obtain adequate
capital funding in the future or enter into future license agreements for our
products, we may not be able to continue as a going concern, which would have an
adverse effect on our business and operations, and investors’ investment in us
may decline.
(4) Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The
carrying value of cash, cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable and
accruals approximate fair value due to the short maturity of these items. The
carrying value of the convertible long-term debt is at book value which
approximates the fair value as the interest rate is at market
value.
Effective
January 1, 2008, we adopted fair value measurement guidance issued by the FASB
related to financial assets and liabilities which define fair value as the
exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a
liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the
asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the
measurement date. This guidance establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy
that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy requires
entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of
unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are
as follows:
·
|
Level
1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities.
|
·
|
Level
2 – Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such
as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets;
quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets
that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be
corroborated by observable market
data.
|
·
|
Level
3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity
and that are significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities.
This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies
and similar valuation techniques that use significant unobservable
inputs.
|
The
guidance requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and
minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
We have
segregated all financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value
on a recurring basis (at least annually) into the most appropriate level within
the fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to determine the fair value at
the measurement date in the table below.
Financial
assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are summarized below:
(in
thousands)
|
March
31, 2010
|
December
31, 2009
|
||||
Level
1
|
Level
2
|
Total
|
Level
1
|
Level
2
|
Total
|
|
Assets:
|
||||||
Cash
|
$4,278
|
$ -
|
$4,278
|
$607
|
$ -
|
$ 607
|
Liabilities:
|
||||||
Derivative
liability
|
$ -
|
$6,831
|
$6,834
|
$ -
|
$9,708
|
$9,708
|
The
adoption of this guidance related to financial assets and liabilities on January
1, 2008 and non-financial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2009 did not have
a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
17
We
consider the conversion options and warrants related to its Series A Cumulative
Convertible Preferred Stock to be derivatives, and we record the fair value of
the derivative liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. Changes in fair
value of the derivative liabilities are included in loss on change in fair value
of derivative in the consolidated statements of operations.
(5) Stock
Based Compensation
For the
three months ended March 31, 2010 we recognized stock-based compensation expense
of $114,000. For the three months ended March 31, 2009 we recognized stock-based
compensation expense of $56,000.
The
following table summarizes stock-based compensation for the three months ended
March 31, 2010:
Three
months ended
March 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Research
and development
|
$ | 73,000 | $ | 36,000 | ||||
General
and administrative
|
41,000 | 20,000 | ||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense
included
in operating expense
|
$ | 114,000 | $ | 56,000 |
We
granted 230,000 stock options during the first quarter of 2010 and granted no
stock options in the same period of 2009. MacroChem options were cancelled upon
acquisition by Access and are no longer outstanding.
Our
weighted average Black-Scholes fair value assumptions used to value the 2010
first three months grants are as follows:
3/31/10
|
|||
Expected
life
|
5.97
yrs
|
||
Risk
free interest rate
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
Expected
volatility(a)
|
118
|
%
|
|
Expected
dividend yield
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
(a)
|
Reflects
movements in our stock price over the most recent historical period
equivalent to the expected life.
|
(6) Stockholders’
Equity
On
January 26, 2010, we completed the sale of approximately 2.10 million shares of
our common stock and warrants to purchase approximately 1.05 million shares of
our common stock at an exercise price of $3.00 per share for an aggregate
purchase price of $6.3 million. Proceeds, net of cash issuance costs from the
sale, were $5.9 million.
In
connection with the sale we issued warrants for placement agent fees to purchase
a total of 125,109 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $3.75 per
share. All of the warrants are exercisable immediately and expire five years
from the date of issue. The fair value of the warrants was $2.19 per share on
the date of grant using the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following
assumptions: expected yield 0.0%, risk-free interest rate 2.38%, expected
volatility 119% and an expected term of 5 years.
18
(7) Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss)
Per Common Share
Basic net
income or loss per share is based upon the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income or loss per share is
based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the
period, plus the effect of additional weighted average common equivalent shares
outstanding during the period when the effect of adding such shares is dilutive.
Common equivalent shares result from the assumed exercise of outstanding stock
options and warrants (the proceeds of which are then assumed to have been used
to repurchase outstanding stock using the treasury stock method). In addition,
the assumed proceeds under the treasury stock method include the average
unrecognized compensation expense of stock options that are in-the-money. This
results in the “assumed” buyback of additional shares, thereby reducing the
dilutive impact of stock options and warrants. Common equivalent shares have not
been included in the net loss per share calculations for three months ended
March 31, 2009, because the effect of including them would have been
anti-dilutive.
Basic and
diluted net income (loss) per share were determined as follows:
(in
thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
Three
months ended
March
31,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | 647 | $ | (2,569 | ) | |||
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
14,766,947 | 10,497,219 | ||||||
Basic
net income (loss) per common share
|
$ | 0.04 | $ | (0.24 | ) | |||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | 647 | $ | (2,569 | ) | |||
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
14,766,947 | 10,497,219 | ||||||
Effect
of dilutive options and warrants
|
2,990,032 | - | ||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding assuming dilution
|
17,756,979 | 10,497,219 | ||||||
Diluted
net income (loss) per common share
|
$ | 0.04 | $ | (0.24 | ) | |||
We did
not include the following securities in the table below in the computation of
diluted net income (loss) per common share because the securities were
anti-dilutive during the periods presented:
Three
months ended
March
31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Warrants
|
6,124,749 | 9,564,570 | ||||||
Stock options | 886,404 | 1,354,820 | ||||||
Convertible
note
|
200,000 | 200,000 | ||||||
Preferred
stock
|
9,951,198 | 9,974,539 | ||||||
Total
|
17,162,351 | 21,093,929 | ||||||
19