ACORN ENERGY, INC. - Quarter Report: 2009 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
|
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended March 31,
2009
|
Commission
file number: 0-19771
ACORN
ENERGY, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
22-2786081
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
|
incorporation or organization)
|
Identification No.)
|
|
4 West Rockland Road
Montchanin, Delaware
|
19710
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(302)
656-1708
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Yes
x
No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,”
“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer o Accelerated
filer o Non-accelerated
filer o Smaller
reporting company x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨ No x
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class
|
Outstanding
at May 10, 2009
|
|
Common
Stock, $0.01 par value per share
|
11,420,987
shares
|
|
ACORN
ENERGY, INC.
Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q
for
the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2009
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
PART
I. Financial Information
|
||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
|
Unaudited
Consolidated Financial Statements:
|
||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2009
|
1
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the three month periods ended March 31, 2008
and 2009
|
2
|
|
Consolidated
Statement of Changes in Equity for the three month period ended March 31,
2009
|
3
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the three month periods ended March 31, 2008
and 2009
|
4
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
6
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
15
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
23
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
23
|
PART
II. Other Information
|
||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
24
|
Item
2 .
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
25
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
26
|
Signatures
|
27
|
Certain
statements contained in this report are forward-looking in nature. These
statements are generally identified by the inclusion of phrases such as “we
expect”, “we anticipate”, “we believe”, “we estimate” and other phrases of
similar meaning. Whether such statements ultimately prove to be accurate depends
upon a variety of factors that may affect our business and operations. Many of
these factors are described in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K as
filed with Securities and Exchange Commission and in Part II, Item 1A of this
Quarterly Report..
ACORN
ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
(in
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
As of December 31,
2008
|
As of March 31,
2009
|
||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 15,142 | $ | 14,698 | ||||
Restricted
deposit
|
2,157 | 1,958 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
4,524 | 4,624 | ||||||
Unbilled
work-in-process
|
581 | 913 | ||||||
Inventory
|
1,148 | 1,225 | ||||||
Other
current assets
|
2,080 | 1,477 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
25,632 | 24,895 | ||||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
2,447 | 2,366 | ||||||
Available
for sale - Investment in Comverge
|
2,462 | 1,929 | ||||||
Investment
in GridSense
|
129 | — | ||||||
Investment
in EnerTech
|
1,117 | 1,047 | ||||||
Funds
in respect of employee termination benefits
|
1,677 | 1,579 | ||||||
Restricted
deposit
|
579 | 525 | ||||||
Other
intangible assets, net
|
10,357 | 9,951 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
6,342 | 6,221 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
313 | 333 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 51,055 | $ | 48,846 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Short-term
bank credit and current maturities of long-term debt
|
$ | 445 | $ | 700 | ||||
Notes
payable
|
3,400 | 3,400 | ||||||
Trade
accounts payable
|
2,285 | 1,748 | ||||||
Accrued
payroll, payroll taxes and social benefits
|
1,314 | 1,114 | ||||||
Other
current liabilities
|
4,350 | 3,270 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
11,794 | 10,232 | ||||||
Long-term
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Liability
for employee termination benefits
|
2,651 | 2,472 | ||||||
Other
liabilities
|
487 | 478 | ||||||
Total
long-term liabilities
|
3,138 | 2,950 | ||||||
Equity:
|
||||||||
Acorn
Energy Inc. Common stock - $0.01 par value per share:
|
||||||||
Authorized
– 20,000,000 shares; Issued –12,454,528 at December 31, 2008 and March 31,
2009
|
124 | 124 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
54,735 | 55,144 | ||||||
Warrants
|
1,020 | 1,020 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(17,587 | ) | (18,650 | ) | ||||
Treasury
stock, at cost – 841,286 and 986,939 shares for December 31, 2008 and
March
31, 2009, respectively
|
(3,719 | ) | (4,047 | ) | ||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(425 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||
Total
Acorn Energy Inc. shareholders’ equity
|
34,148 | 33,582 | ||||||
Non-controlling
interests
|
1,975 | 2,082 | ||||||
Total
equity
|
36,123 | 35,664 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and equity
|
$ | 51,055 | $ | 48,846 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
1
ACORN
ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(unaudited)
(in
thousands, except per share data)
Three
months ended
March
31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2009
|
|||||||
Sales
|
||||||||
Catalytic
regeneration services
|
$ | 2,249 | $ | 5,390 | ||||
Projects
|
1,908 | 1,966 | ||||||
Software
license and services
|
— | 1,027 | ||||||
Other
|
138 | 95 | ||||||
4,295 | 8,478 | |||||||
Cost
of sales
|
||||||||
Catalytic
regeneration services
|
1,491 | 3,535 | ||||||
Projects
|
1,307 | 1,219 | ||||||
Software
license and services
|
— | 271 | ||||||
Other
|
99 | 74 | ||||||
2,897 | 5,099 | |||||||
Gross
profit
|
1,398 | 3,379 | ||||||
Operating
expenses:
|
||||||||
Research
and development expenses
|
51 | 276 | ||||||
Impairments
|
248 | 70 | ||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
2,305 | 4,108 | ||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
2,604 | 4,454 | ||||||
Operating
loss
|
(1,206 | ) | (1,075 | ) | ||||
Finance
expense, net
|
(2,988 | ) | (169 | ) | ||||
Gain
on early redemption of convertible debentures
|
1,259 | — | ||||||
Gain
on sale of Comverge shares
|
— | 417 | ||||||
Loss
before taxes on income
|
(2,935 | ) | (827 | ) | ||||
Income
tax benefit
|
642 | — | ||||||
Loss
from operations of the Company and its consolidated
subsidiaries
|
(2,293 | ) | (827 | ) | ||||
Share
in losses of Paketeria
|
(287 | ) | — | |||||
Share
in losses of GridSense
|
— | (129 | ) | |||||
Net
loss
|
(2,580 | ) | (956 | ) | ||||
Net
income attributable to non-controlling interests
|
(9 | ) | (107 | ) | ||||
Net
loss attributable to Acorn Energy Inc.
|
$ | (2,589 | ) | $ | (1,063 | ) | ||
Basic
and diluted earnings per share attributable to Acorn
Energy Inc.:
|
||||||||
Net
loss per share attributable to Acorn Energy Inc. – basic and
diluted
|
$ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | ||
Weighted
average number of shares outstanding attributable to Acorn Energy
Inc. – basic and diluted
|
11,050 | 11,535 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
2
ACORN
ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statement of Changes in
Equity (unaudited)
(in
thousands)
Number of
Shares
|
Common
Stock
|
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
|
Warrants
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
Treasury
Stock
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
|
Non-
controlling
interests
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances
as of December
31, 2008
|
12,455 | $ | 124 | $ | 54,735 | $ | 1,020 | $ | (17,587 | ) | $ | (3,719 | ) | $ | (425 | ) | $ | 1,975 | $ | 36,123 | ||||||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
— | — | — | — | (1,063 | ) | — | — | 107 | (956 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
FAS
115 adjustment on Comverge shares
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | 625 | — | 625 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Differences
from translation of financial statements of subsidiaries
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | (209 | ) | — | (209 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
loss
|
— | — | — | — | — | — | — | (540 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase
of treasury shares
|
— | — | — | — | — | (328 | ) | — | (328 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
option compensation
|
— | — | 254 | — | — | — | — | — | 254 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock
option compensation of subsidiaries
|
— | — | 155 | — | — | — | — | — | 155 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances
as of March
31, 2009
|
12,455 | $ | 124 | $ | 55,144 | $ | 1,020 | $ | (18,650 | ) | $ | (4,047 | ) | $ | (9 | ) | $ | 2,082 | $ | 35,664 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
3
ACORN
ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
(dollars
in thousands)
Three
months ended
March
31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2009
|
|||||||
Cash
flows provided by (used in) operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (2,580 | ) | $ | (956 | ) | ||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
290 | 436 | ||||||
Share
in losses of Paketeria
|
287 | — | ||||||
Share
in losses of GridSense
|
— | 129 | ||||||
Exchange
rate adjustment on restricted deposits
|
— | 253 | ||||||
Exchange
rate adjustment on amounts funded for employee termination benefits net of
exchange adjustment on liability for employee termination
benefits
|
38 | (82 | ) | |||||
Increase
in liability for employee termination benefits
|
51 | 58 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
(646 | ) | — | |||||
Amortization
of stock-based deferred compensation
|
149 | 409 | ||||||
Amortization
of beneficial conversion feature, debt origination costs and value of
warrants in private placement of Debentures
|
3,064 | — | ||||||
Gain
on early redemption of Debentures
|
(1,259 | ) | — | |||||
Impairments
|
248 | 70 | ||||||
Gain
on sale of Comverge shares
|
— | (417 | ) | |||||
Other
|
9 | — | ||||||
Change
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Decrease
in accounts receivable, unbilled work-in process and other current and
other assets
|
40 | 298 | ||||||
Increase
in inventory
|
(100 | ) | (77 | ) | ||||
Increase
in accounts payable, accrued payroll, payroll taxes and social benefits,
other current liabilities and other liabilities
|
(978 | ) | (1,387 | ) | ||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(1,387 | ) | (1,266 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows provided by (used in) investing activities:
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from sale of Comverge shares
|
— | 1,397 | ||||||
Payment
for DSIT shares from exercise of put option
|
— | (294 | ) | |||||
Investment
in GridSense
|
(1,153 | ) | — | |||||
Restricted
deposits
|
(1,388 | ) | — | |||||
Loans
to investee and potential investee companies
|
(2,877 | ) | — | |||||
Transaction
costs in 2007 acquisition of SCR Tech
|
(927 | ) | — | |||||
Amounts
funded for employee termination benefits
|
(16 | ) | (57 | ) | ||||
Acquisitions
of property and equipment
|
(110 | ) | (120 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
(6,471 | ) | 926 | |||||
Cash
flows provided by (used in) financing activities:
|
||||||||
Short-term
debt borrowings, net
|
164 | 259 | ||||||
Repayments
of long-term debt
|
(67 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||
Purchase
of treasury shares
|
— | (328 | ) | |||||
Redemption
of Convertible Debentures
|
(3,443 | ) | — | |||||
Issuance
of shares to non-controlling interest in consolidated
subsidiary
|
1,948 | — | ||||||
Proceeds
from employee stock option and warrant exercises
|
121 | — | ||||||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(1,277 | ) | (73 | ) | ||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
— | (31 | ) | |||||
Net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(9,135 | ) | (444 | ) | ||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
19,644 | 15,142 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
10,509 | 14,698 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
4
ACORN
ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
(dollars
in thousands)
Three months ended
March 31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2009
|
|||||||
Non-cash
items:
|
||||||||
Unrealized
gain (loss) from Comverge shares
|
$ | (37,319 | ) | $ | 625 | |||
Due
from broker from sale of Comverge shares
|
— | $ | 178 | |||||
Reduction
of deferred tax liability with respect to unrealized loss from
Comverge shares
|
$ | 14,927 | ||||||
Non-cash
financing and investing items
|
||||||||
Conversion
of Debentures to common stock and additional
paid-in-capital
|
$ | 2,963 |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
5
ACORN
ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements (unaudited)
(dollars
in thousands)
Note
1: Basis of Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Acorn Energy, Inc.
and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for
interim financial information and with the instructions to Article 10 of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion
of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have
been included. Operating results for the three-month period ended
March 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for the year ending December 31, 2009. These unaudited consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Effective
January 1, 2009, the Company implemented Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements, an amendment to ARB No. 51, or SFAS 160. This standard
changed the accounting for and reporting of minority interests (now called
noncontrolling interests) in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Upon adoption, certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to
the current period financial statement presentation. These reclassifications
have no effect on the Company’s previously reported financial position or
results of operations (See Note 2).
Note
2: New Accounting Standards
In December 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”) which
replaces SFAS No. 141, “Business Combination”. SFAS 141R establishes the
principles and requirements for how an acquirer: (1) recognizes and measures in
its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities
assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree; (2) recognizes and
measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a
bargain purchase; and (3) discloses the business combination. This Statement
applies to all transactions in which an entity obtains control of one or more
businesses, including transactions that occur without the transfer of any type
of consideration. SFAS 141R is effective on a prospective basis for all business
combinations on or after January 1, 2009, with the exception of the accounting
for valuation allowances on deferred taxes and acquired tax contingencies. The
adoption of SFAS 141R had no material impact on the Company’s financial
statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 160 “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements - an
amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160 amends ARB No. 51 and
establishes accounting and reporting standards that require noncontrolling
interests (previously referred to as minority interest) to be reported as a
component of equity, changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent
retains its controlling interest be accounted for as equity transactions, and
upon a loss of control, retained ownership interest will be remeasured at fair
value, with any gain or loss recognized in earnings. Prior to adoption of SFAS
160 on January 1, 2009, the Company had stopped attributing losses to its DSIT
subsidiary because the losses exceeded the carrying amount of the noncontrolling
interest. Upon adoption of SFAS 160, the Company prospectively attributes income
and losses to the noncontrolling interests associated with DSIT. The
presentation and disclosure requirements of SFAS 160 were applied
retrospectively. Other than the change in presentation of noncontrolling
interests and the treatment of noncontrolling interests associated with DSIT,
the adoption of SFAS 160 had no impact on the Company’s financial
statements.
6
In March 2008, FASB issued Statement
No. 161, "Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 133" ("FAS 161"). FAS 161 amends and expands the
disclosure requirements of FAS 133 to clarify how and why companies use
derivative instruments. In addition, FAS 161 requires more disclosures regarding
how companies account for derivative instruments and the impact derivatives have
on a company’s financial statements. Other than the required disclosures (see
Note 10) the adoption of SFAS 161 had no impact on the Company’s financial
statements.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB
Staff Position (the “FSP”) FAS No. 142-3, which amends the factors that must be
considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the
useful life over which to amortize the cost of a recognized intangible asset
under FAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” The FSP requires an
entity to consider its own assumptions about renewal or extension of the term of
the arrangement, consistent with its expected use of the asset, and is an
attempt to improve consistency between the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset under FAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to
measure the fair value of the asset under FAS No. 141, “Business Combinations.”.
The adoption of FSP FAS 142-3 had no impact on the Company’s financial
statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB
Staff Position No. 157-4, "Determining Whether a Market is not Active and a
Transaction is not Distressed" ("FSP FAS 157-4"), which provides additional
guidance in accordance with FASB No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, when the
volume and level of activity for the asset or liability has significantly
decreased. FSP FAS 157-4 shall be effective for interim and annual reporting
periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the
future impacts and disclosures of this staff position.
In April
2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 107-1 ("FSP FAS 107-1") and APB
28-1 ("APB 28-1"), which amends FASB Statement No. 107, Disclosures about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments and APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial
Reporting, to require disclosures about the fair value of financial instruments
for interim reporting periods. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 will be effective for
interim reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company is currently
evaluating the future impacts and disclosures of this staff
position.
Note
3: Inventory
As of
December
31, 2008
|
As of
March 31,
2009
|
|||||||
Raw
materials
|
$ | 720 | $ | 633 | ||||
Finished
goods
|
428 | 592 | ||||||
$ | 1,148 | $ | 1,225 |
Note
4: Investment in Comverge Inc. (Comverge)
During
the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company sold 225,000 of its 502,500
Comverge shares held at the beginning of 2009. The Company received proceeds of
$1,397 from the sales and receivable due from a broker of $178. The Company
recorded a pre-tax gain of $417 on the sale of these shares.
The
Company’s remaining 277,500 Comverge shares are accounted for as
“available-for-sale” under SFAS 115 “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt
and Equity Securities”. Accordingly, the Company reflected its investment in
Comverge based on Comverge’s share price of $6.95 at March 31, 2009 which
resulted in an adjustment to the carrying value to reflect a fair market value
of $1,929.
7
Note
5: Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The
changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill from December 31, 2008 to March
31, 2009 were as follows:
CoaLogix
|
Naval &
RT
Solutions
|
EIS
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Balance
as of December 31, 2008
|
3,714 | $ | 530 | $ | 2,098 | $ | 6,342 | |||||||||
Translation
adjustment
|
— | (49 | ) | (72 | ) | (121 | ) | |||||||||
Balance
as of March 31, 2009
|
$ | 3,714 | $ | 481 | $ | 2,026 | $ | 6,221 |
The
changes in the carrying amounts and accumulated amortization of intangible
assets from December 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009 were as
follows:
SCR
Technologies**
|
Solucorp
License
|
Naval
Technologies
|
Software***
|
Customer
Relationships***
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost
|
A.A.*
|
Cost
|
A.A.*
|
Cost
|
A.A.*
|
Cost
|
A.A.*
|
Cost
|
A.A.*
|
Net
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
as of December 31, 2008
|
$ | 5,511 | $ | (633 | ) | $ | 2,000 | $ | (128 | ) | $ | 523 | $ | (48 | ) | $ | 2,865 | $ | (69 | ) | $ | 349 | $ | (13 | ) | $ | 10,357 | |||||||||||||||||
Amortization
|
— | (136 | ) | — | (50 | ) | — | (19 | ) | — | (44 | ) | — | (9 | ) | (258 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative
translation adjustment
|
— | — | — | — | (48 | ) | 6 | (98 | ) | 3 | (12 | ) | 1 | (148 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance
as of March 31, 2009
|
$ | 5,511 | $ | (769 | ) | $ | 2,000 | $ | (178 | ) | $ | 475 | $ | (61 | ) | $ | 2,767 | $ | (110 | ) | $ | 337 | $ | (21 | ) | $ | 9,951 |
* Accumulated
amortization
** SCR
Technologies includes regeneration, rejuvenation and on-site cleaning
technologies associated with CoaLogix.
***
Software and Customer Relationships relates to the Company’s EIS
segment.
All
intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives, which
were estimated to be ten years for SCR Technologies and the Solucorp license,
seven years for Naval Technologies, sixteen years for Software and ten years for
customer relationships. Amortization expense for each of the three months ended
March 31, 2008 and 2009 amounted to $164 and $258,
respectively. Amortization expense with respect to intangible assets
is estimated to be $1,032 per year for each of the years ending March 31, 2010
through 2014.
8
Note
6: Stock Options and Warrants
(a)
Acorn Stock Options
A summary
of stock option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2009 is as
follows:
Number
of
Options (in
shares)
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
||||||||||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2008
|
1,876,500 | $ | 3.27 | ||||||||||
Granted
|
307,000 | $ | 2.16 | ||||||||||
Exercised
|
— | ||||||||||||
Forfeited
or expired
|
(253,667 | ) | $ | 2.65 | |||||||||
Outstanding
at March 31, 2009
|
1,929,833 | $ | 3.17 |
3.7
years
|
$ | 532 | |||||||
Exercisable
at March 31, 2009
|
1,457,330 | $ | 3.15 |
2.4
years
|
$ | 403 |
The
weighted average grant date fair value of the 307,000 stock options granted
during the first three months of 2009 was $1.51 per share. The fair value of the
options granted was estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the following weighted average
assumptions:
Volatility
|
70 | % | ||
Expected term
(years)
|
5.6
years
|
|||
Risk
free interest rate
|
1.8 | % | ||
Expected
dividend yield
|
None
|
(b)
Stock-based compensation expense
Total
stock-based compensation expense included in the Company’s statements of
operations for the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively,
was:
Three months ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2009
|
|||||||
Cost
of sales
|
$ | — | $ | 49 | ||||
Research
and development expense
|
— | 19 | ||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
149 | 341 | ||||||
Total
stock based compensation expense
|
$ | 149 | $ | 409 |
9
(c)
Warrants
A summary
of stock warrants activity for the three months ended March 31, 2009 is as
follows:
Number of
Warrants (in
shares)
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
|
|||||||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2008
|
784,023 | $ | 4.06 |
3.1
years
|
|||||
Granted
|
— | ||||||||
Exercised
|
— | ||||||||
Forfeited
or expired
|
— | ||||||||
Outstanding
and exercisable at March
31, 2009
|
784,023 | $ | 4.06 |
2.8
years
|
Note
7: Share Repurchase Program
On
October 6, 2008, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a share
repurchase program of up to 1,000,000 shares of its common stock. The share
repurchase program is being implemented at management’s discretion from time to
time. During the period from January 1, 2009 to March 31, 2009, the Company
repurchased 145,653 shares of its common stock at an average price of $2.25 per
share. As at March 31, 2009, the Company repurchased a total of 209,568 shares
of its common stock under the program.
Note
8: Warranty Provision
The
following table summarizes the changes in accrued warranty liability from the
period from December 31, 2008 to March 31, 2009:
Gross Carrying
Amount
|
||||
Balance
at December 31, 2008
|
$ | 256 | ||
Warranties
issued and adjustment of provision
|
4 | |||
Warranty
claims
|
— | |||
Balance
at March 31, 2009*
|
$ | 260 |
* $20 of
the warranty provision is included in Other Current Liabilities and $240 in
Other Liabilities at March 31, 2009.
The
Company’s warranty provision is based upon the Company’s estimate of costs to be
incurred during the warranty period.
10
Note
9: Fair Value Measurement
In
February 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement
No. 157” (“FSP No. 157-2”), which delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 157,
“Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”) for non-financial assets and
non-financial liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008,
except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis. This provision of SFAS No. 157 was effective
for the Company beginning on January 1, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did
not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial
statements, because the Company did not have any non-financial assets or
non-financial liabilities recognized or disclosed at fair value at the adoption
date.
SFAS No.
157 defines fair value for financial reporting as the price that would be
received upon the sale of an asset or paid upon the transfer of a liability in
an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The
fair value measurement of our financial assets utilized assumptions categorized
as observable inputs under SFAS No. 157. Observable inputs are assumptions based
on independent market data sources.
The
following table sets forth information regarding the fair value measurement of
our financial assets as of March 31, 2009:
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Available
for sale securities
|
$ | 1,929 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,929 | ||||||||
Derivative
assets
|
3 | — | — | 3 | ||||||||||||
Derivative
liabilities
|
(30 | ) | — | — | (30 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 1,902 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,902 |
Marketable
securities that are classified in Level 1 consist of available-for-sale
securities for which market prices are readily available. Unrealized gains or
losses from available-for-sale securities are recorded in Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss). Derivative assets and liabilities that are
classified in Level 1 consist of forward contracts for the purchase of NIS and
Great Britain pounds (“GBP”) for which market prices are readily available.
Unrealized gains or losses from forward contracts are recorded in Finance
expense, net.
11
Note
10: Segment Information
The Company’s current operations are
based upon three operating segments:
|
·
|
CoaLogix
- SCR (Selective Catalytic Reduction) Catalyst and Management services
conducted through the Company’s CoaLogix subsidiary which provides through
its SCR-Tech, LLC subsidiary catalyst regeneration technologies and
management services for selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems used
by coal-fired power plants to reduce nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions. In
addition, CoaLogix offers a new technology (MetalliFix™) through its
MetalliFix LLC subsidiary for the removal of heavy metals, such as
mercury, from coal-fired power
plants.
|
|
·
|
Naval
and RT Solutions whose activities are focused on the following areas –
sonar and acoustic related solutions for energy, defense and commercial
markets and other real-time and embedded hardware & software
development and production. Naval and RT Solutions activities are provided
through the Company’s DSIT Solutions Ltd.
subsidiary.
|
|
·
|
Energy
Infrastructure Software (EIS) services are provided through the Company’s
Coreworx subsidiary which was acquired in August 2008. Coreworx provides
integrated project collaboration and advanced document management
solutions for the architecture, engineering and construction markets,
particularly for large capital projects. As these activities were acquired
in August 2008, there are no comparative results reported for these
activities for the three month period ended March 31,
2008.
|
Other operations include various
operations that do not meet the quantitative thresholds of SFAS No.
131.
CoaLogix
|
Naval and RT
Solutions
|
EIS
|
Other
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
months ended March 31, 2009:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues
from external customers
|
$ | 5,390 | $ | 1,796 | $ | 1,027 | $ | 265 | $ | 8,478 | ||||||||||
Intersegment
revenues
|
— | 5 | — | — | 5 | |||||||||||||||
Segment
gross profit
|
1,855 | 719 | 755 | 50 | 3,379 | |||||||||||||||
Segment
income (loss)
|
576 | 198 | (827 | ) | (42 | ) | (95 | ) | ||||||||||||
Stock
compensation expense
|
101 | 2 | 54 | — | 157 | |||||||||||||||
Three
months ended March 31, 2008:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues
from external customers
|
$ | 2,249 | $ | 1,682 | $ | — | $ | 364 | $ | 4,295 | ||||||||||
Intersegment
revenues
|
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Segment
gross profit
|
758 | 564 | — | 76 | 1,398 | |||||||||||||||
Segment
income (loss)
|
183 | 83 | — | (35 | ) | 231 | ||||||||||||||
Stock
compensation expense
|
— | — | — | — | — |
12
Reconciliation
of Segment Income (Loss) to Consolidated Net Income
Three months ended
March 31,
|
||||||||
2008
|
2009
|
|||||||
Total
income (loss) for reportable segments
|
$ | 266 | $ | (53 | ) | |||
Other
operational segment loss
|
(35 | ) | (42 | ) | ||||
Total
operating income (loss)
|
231 | (95 | ) | |||||
Share
of losses in Paketeria
|
(287 | ) | — | |||||
Share
of losses in GridSense
|
— | (129 | ) | |||||
Impairments
|
(248 | ) | (70 | ) | ||||
Non-controlling
interest
|
(9 | ) | (107 | ) | ||||
Gain
on sale of Comverge shares
|
— | 417 | ||||||
Gain
on early redemption of Convertible Debentures
|
1,259 | — | ||||||
Interest
expense associated with early redemption of Convertible
Debentures
|
(3,064 | ) | — | |||||
Income
tax benefit
|
642 | — | ||||||
Net
loss of corporate headquarters and other unallocated
costs*
|
(1,113 | ) | (1,079 | ) | ||||
Net
loss attributable to Acorn Energy Inc.
|
$ | (2,589 | ) | $ | (1,063 | ) |
*
Includes stock compensation expense of $149 and $252 for the three month periods
ending March 31, 2008 and 2009, respectively.
Note
11: Subsequent Events
CoaLogix
On April 8, 2009, the Company entered
into a Common Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with the
Company’s 85% owned CoaLogix Inc. subsidiary, EnerTech Capital Partners III L.P.
(“EnerTech”) and certain members of CoaLogix’s senior management pursuant to
which each of the Company and EnerTech each agreed to purchase from CoaLogix
781,111 shares of common stock for a purchase price of $5,624, and certain
members of CoaLogix’s senior management agreed to purchase 36,111 shares of
common stock of CoaLogix for an aggregate purchase price of $260. The
Purchase Agreement provides that the Company, EnerTech and senior management
will purchase such shares of common stock in installments as funding is needed
by CoaLogix for plant expansion, technology development, legal expenses and
computer software. Following completion of the stock purchase under
the Purchase Agreement, the Company would own approximately 72.3% of CoaLogix.
The Company’s, EnerTech’s and senior management’s share of the initial funding
under the Purchase Agreement is $2,140 of which $1,046 was the Company’s share.
All these funds were transferred to CoaLogix in April 2009. As a result of this
transfer, the Company’s holdings in CoaLogix were diluted to approximately
81.7%
Capital
Call by EnerTech
In April
2009, the Company received a capital call of $500 from EnerTech Capital Partners
III L.P. (“EnerTech”) relating to the Company’s investment in
EnerTech. The Company funded the capital call in April
2009. The Company’s has currently funded $1,650 of its $5,000
investment commitment in EnerTech.
13
SRED
Claim
In April
2009, the Company’s Coreworx subsidiary received a proposal from the Canada
Revenue Agency of the Ontario Ministry of Revenue in connection with Coreworx’s
2007 scientific research and experimental development tax credit refund claim or
Ontario innovation tax credit refund claim for 2007 (collectively, the “SRED
Claim”). Under the proposal, Coreworx expects to receive approximately CDN$743
($589) net of contingency fees plus interest. The Company expects the funds to
be received during the second quarter of 2009.
Share
Repurchase Program
During
the period from April 1 2009 to May 8, 2009, the Company purchased 46,602 shares
of its common stock at an average price of $2.52 per share under its Stock
Repurchase Program and has repurchased a total of 256,170 shares of common stock
under the program.
.
Investment
in Comverge
During
the period from April 1, 2009 to May 8, 2009, the Company sold 134,000 of its
shares of Comverge and received proceeds of $1,010. As of May 8, 2009, the total
market value of the Company’s remaining 143,500 Comverge shares was
approximately $1,217 based on a May 8, 2008 closing market price of $8.48 per
share.
14
ACORN
ENERGY, INC.
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of
Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
The
following discussion includes statements that are forward-looking in nature.
Whether such statements ultimately prove to be accurate depends upon a variety
of factors that may affect our business and operations. Certain of
these factors are discussed in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Recent
Developments
Additional
Investment in CoaLogix
On April 8, 2009, we entered into a
Common Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with our 85% owned
CoaLogix Inc. subsidiary (“CoaLogix”), EnerTech Capital Partners III L.P.
(“EnerTech”) and certain members of CoaLogix’s senior management pursuant to
which we and EnerTech each agreed to purchase from CoaLogix 781,111 shares of
common stock for a purchase price of $5.6 million, and certain members of
CoaLogix’s senior management agreed to purchase 36,111 shares of common stock of
CoaLogix for an aggregate purchase price of approximately
$260,000. The Purchase Agreement provides that Acorn, EnerTech and
senior management will purchase such shares of common stock in installments as
funding is needed by CoaLogix for plant expansion, technology development, legal
expenses and computer software. Following completion of the stock
purchase under the Purchase Agreement, we would own approximately 72.3% of
CoaLogix. Acorn’s, EnerTech’s and senior management’s share of the initial
funding under the Purchase Agreement was $2,140,000 of which $1,046,000 was the
Company’s share. All these funds were transferred to CoaLogix in April 2009. As
a result of this transfer, our holdings in CoaLogix were diluted to
approximately 81.7%.
Clean
Air Mercury Rule
On February 23, 2009, the U.S. Supreme
Court refused to hear an appeal of the earlier decision by the U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit which vacated the Clean Air Mercury Rule
(“CAMR”). With this decision, CAMR is no longer
effective. CAMR was the federal government’s attempt to reduce
mercury emissions from coal-fueled power plants, and with the vacature of CAMR
there is no current federal regulation directly addressing reduction of mercury
emissions from coal-fueled power plants. The Environmental Protection
Agency is expected to promulgate new regulations restricting mercury emissions;
however, there is no way to predict when such new regulations will be
promulgated or effective. The lack of federal regulations restricting
mercury emissions could cause a delay for the demand for MetalliFix by
utilities, and could have a negative impact upon CoaLogix’s marketing and sales
of MetalliFix.
SRED
Claim
In April
2009, our Coreworx subsidiary received a proposal from the Canada Revenue Agency
of the Ontario Ministry of Revenue in connection with its 2007 scientific
research and experimental development tax credit refund claim or Ontario
innovation tax credit refund claim for 2007 (collectively, the “SRED Claim”).
Under the proposal, Coreworx expects to receive approximately CDN$743,000
($589,000) net of contingency fees plus interest. We expect the funds to be
received during the second quarter of 2009.
15
GridSense
On
February 19, 2009, a majority of the shareholders approved a plan to make
GridSense a private company by GridSense transferring its grid monitoring
business to a newly formed Australian corporation that will be owned by certain
of the significant shareholders of GridSense including Acorn
Energy. Under the plan, the debt of CDN$750,000 ($595,000) owed by
GridSense to the Company will be continue to be owed by GridSense’s Australian
operating subsidiary. Our percentage ownership of the newly formed
Australian corporation once GridSense has gone private is expected to be
approximately 31.2%. The going-private transaction is expected to be
effective in the second quarter of 2009.
Comverge
During
the period from April 1, 2009 to May 8, 2009, we sold 134,000 of our shares of
Comverge and received proceeds of approximately $1.0 million. As of May 8, 2009,
the total market value of our remaining 143,500 Comverge shares was
approximately $1.2 million based on a May 8, 2008 closing market price of $8.48
per share.
Share
Repurchase Program
During
the period from April 1, 2009 to May 8, 2009, we continued to purchase our
shares under our Stock Repurchase Program. During that period, we purchased
46,602 shares of our common stock at an average price of $2.52 per
share.
Overview
and Trend Information
During
the 2009 period included in this report, we had operations in three reportable
segments: providing catalyst regeneration technologies and management services
for SCR systems through our CoaLogix subsidiary, Naval and RT Solutions which is
conducted through our DSIT subsidiary and Energy Infrastructure Software (“EIS”)
services provided through our Coreworx subsidiary which was acquired in August
2008. Accordingly, our results for the three month period ending
March 31, 2009 does not include comparative information for the three month
period ending March 31, 2008 with respect to Coreworx’s results.
The
following analysis should be read together with the segment information provided
in Note 10 to the interim unaudited consolidated financial statements included
in this quarterly report.
CoaLogix
Our CoaLogix segment reported
significantly increased revenues in the first quarter of 2009 as compared to the
first quarter of 2008 as well as increased gross profit, gross margin and net
income.
Revenues of $5.4 million represent an
increase of approximately $3.1 million or 140% in the first quarter of 2009 as
compared to the first quarter of 2008. First quarter 2009 revenues also
reflected an increase of $0.7 million or 16% over fourth quarter 2008 revenues
of $4.7 million. The increase in revenues was due to increased penetration in
the regeneration market combined with the ability to process more SCR modules
facilitated by the completion of a plant expansion in the fourth quarter
2008.
Gross profit in the first quarter of
2009 increased by approximately $1.1 million or 145% over first quarter 2008
gross profit. The increase in gross profit was due to the increased revenues as
CoaLogix’s gross margin remained stable at 34% for both
periods.
16
During the quarter, CoaLogix received
new orders totaling $4.3 million and at the end of March 2009 had a backlog of
$7.2 million. Based on our backlog, we expect that revenues in the coming
quarters will continue to be above 2008 levels. However, we do expect revenues
in the second and third quarters of 2009 to be below first quarter sales due to
seasonal factors. Revenues and margins for the second and third
quarters are generally lower than those of first and fourth quarters due to
seasonal factors since power plants do not schedule service of their catalyst
systems during the spring and summer ozone months.
As noted
above in “Recent Developments”, on April 8, 2009, we entered into the Purchase
Agreement with CoaLogix, EnerTech and certain members of CoaLogix’s senior
management pursuant to which Acorn and EnerTech each agreed to purchase from
CoaLogix 781,111 shares of common stock for a purchase price of $5.6 million,
and certain members of CoaLogix’s senior management agreed to purchase 36,111
shares of common stock of CoaLogix for an aggregate purchase price of
approximately $260,000. Proceeds of the sale of the common stock will
be used by CoaLogix for plant expansion, technology development, legal expenses
and computer software.
Naval
& RT Solutions
In
February 2009, DSIT received a $2.3 million order for its AquaShield™ underwater
security system. This order follows $1.7 million order for another AquaShield™
underwater security system in January 2009.
Our Naval
& RT Solutions segment reported increased revenues in the first quarter of
2009 as compared to the first quarter of 2008 as well as increased gross profit,
gross margin and net income.
First quarter 2009 revenues of $1.8
million represents a slight increase of approximately $0.1 million or 7% as
compared to the first quarter of 2008. First quarter 2009 revenues also
reflected a slight increase of $0.1 million or 6% compared to fourth quarter
2008 segment revenues of $1.7 million. The increase in revenues as compared to
the first quarter of 2008 was due to the revenues recorded with respect to the
above-mentioned AquaShield™ orders which offset the loss of revenues from the
near completion of a large project in the fourth quarter of 2008.
Gross profit in the first quarter of
2009 increased by approximately $0.2 million or 28% over first quarter 2008
gross profit. Gross margins increased in the first quarter of 2009 to 40% as
compared to 34% in the first quarter of 2008. The increase in gross profit was
due primarily to the increased margins on projects as the current mix of
projects has higher margins than those in 2008.
At December 31, 2008, our Naval and RT
Solutions segment had a backlog of approximately $4.3 million. During the
quarter, we received new orders totaling approximately $4.2 million and at the
end of March 2009 had a backlog of approximately $7.0 million. Based on our backlog, we
expect that revenues in the coming quarters will continue to be at least at
first quarter 2009 levels.
Coreworx
As noted
above in “Recent Developments, in April 2009, our Coreworx subsidiary received a
proposal from the Canada Revenue Agency of the Ontario Ministry of Revenue in
connection with its 2007 scientific research and experimental development tax
credit refund claim or Ontario innovation tax credit refund claim for 2007
(collectively, the “SRED Claim”). Under the proposal, Coreworx expects to
receive approximately CDN$743,000 ($589,000) net of contingency fees plus
interest. We expect the funds to be received during the second quarter of
2009.
As we
acquired Coreworx in August 2008, its results are not included in our 2008
results. However, Coreworx’s revenues of CDN$1.3 million in the first quarter of
2009 represents an increase of CDN$1.0 million over Coreworx’s first quarter
2008 revenues of CDN$0.3 million. The increase in revenues is due to an increase
in licenses sold to Chevron.
17
Coreworx’s
gross profit in the first quarter of 2009 was CDN$1.0 million compared to 2008
first quarter gross profit of CDN$0.2 million. The increase in
Coreworx’s gross profit in 2009 was attributable to the increase in sales. Gross
margin was down slightly from 82% in the first quarter of 2008 to 74% due to the
mix of revenues (software license sales have higher margins than other category
of sales) and a one time charge to expense in the first quarter of
2009.
During
the first quarter of 2009, Coreworx began an initiative to target sales in Latin
and South America in the hopes of expanding its geographic reach in the coming
periods. In addition, Coreworx is considering a build up of personnel to
undertake an initiative to enter into the nuclear industry space which Coreworx
expects to be a rapidly growing market in the coming years. In connection with
this initiative, Acorn has committed to loan Coreworx $1.0 million to provide
Coreworx with the capital it needs to develop this new software product, and
anticipates such loan will be made in May 2009.
In
addition to the $1.0 million loan to be made by Acorn to Coreworx for
development of the new project information software for the nuclear power plant
industry, Coreworx will require additional working capital support in order to
finance its working capital needs in 2009. This support may be in the form of a
bank line, new investment by others, additional investment by Acorn, or a
combination of the above. There is no assurance that such support will be
available from such sources in sufficient amounts, in a timely manner and on
acceptable terms. The availability and amount of any additional
investment from us in Coreworx may be limited by the working capital needs of
our corporate activities and other operating companies.
GridSense
We
account for our GridSense investment the using equity method and, as such, we
record approximately 24% of its income/loss in our consolidated results. We
record our share of income or loss in GridSense with a lag of three months as we
are not able to receive timely financial information. In the first quarter of
2009, we recorded a loss of $129,000 representing our approximate 24% share of
GridSense’s losses for the period from October 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008 as
well as the amortization of certain intangible assets acquired by us in our
initial investment. As our investment in GridSense has been reduced to zero, we
will no longer record equity income or loss in GridSense until such a time as
our investment carrying value becomes positive.
Corporate
As noted above in “Recent
Developments”, on April 8, 2009, we entered into the Purchase Agreement with
CoaLogix and others, pursuant to which we agreed to purchase from CoaLogix
781,111 shares of common stock for a purchase price of $5.6
million, with the purchase price being payable in installments. Our
share of the initial funding under the Purchase Agreement was $1,046,000 and
these funds were transferred to CoaLogix in April 2009. As a result of this
transfer, our holdings in CoaLogix were diluted to approximately
81.7%.
Additionally, we committed to loan $1.0
million to Coreworx for Coreworx’s development of a new project information
software product for the nuclear power plant industry. The loan is anticipated
to be made in May 2009.
In April 2009, we received a capital
call of $500,000 from EnerTech in connections with our investment in
EnerTech. We funded the capital call in April 2009. Following this
capital call, we will have funded approximately $1.7 million of our $5.0 million
commitment to EnerTech.
18
In
October, 2008, our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of
up to 1,000,000 shares of our common stock. The share repurchase program is
being implemented at management’s discretion from time to time. In the period
from January 1 2009 to May 8, 2009, we purchased 192,255 shares of our common
stock at an average price of $2.32 per share under our Stock Repurchase Program
and have repurchased a total of 256,170 shares of our common stock under the
program.
At the
end of April 2009, we had corporate debt of $3.4 million related to our
acquisition of Coreworx and approximately $12.4 million in unrestricted
cash. In addition, we have restricted cash of $2.6 million of which
we expect a significant portion to be released in the second quarter of 2009. We
continue to have significant corporate cash expenses and will continue to expend
in the future, significant amounts of funds on professional fees and other costs
in connection with our strategy to seek out and invest in companies that fit our
target business model.
Results
of Operations
The
following table sets forth certain information with respect to the consolidated
results of operations of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2008
and 2009, including the percentage of total revenues during each period
attributable to selected components of the operations statement data and for the
period to period percentage changes in such components. Our results
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 include the results of our newly
acquired Coreworx subsidiary. As such, results for the three months ended March
31, 2009 may not be comparable to the results for the three months ended March
31, 2008 without negating the effect of Coreworx’s results. For segment data see
Note 10 to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in this
quarterly report.
Three
months ended March 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
2008
|
2009
|
Change
|
||||||||||||||||||
$(,000)
|
%
of
sales
|
$(,000)
|
%
of
sales
|
From
2008
to
2009
|
||||||||||||||||
Sales
|
$ | 4,295 | 100 | % | $ | 8,478 | 100 | % | 97 | % | ||||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
2,897 | 67 | 5,099 | 60 | 76 | |||||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
1,398 | 33 | 3,379 | 40 | 142 | |||||||||||||||
R&D
expenses
|
51 | 1 | 276 | 3 | 441 | |||||||||||||||
Impairments
|
248 | 6 | 70 | 1 | (72 | ) | ||||||||||||||
SG&A
expenses
|
2,305 | 54 | 4,108 | 48 | 78 | |||||||||||||||
Operating
loss
|
(1,206 | ) | (28 | ) | (1,075 | ) | (13 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||||||
Finance
expense, net
|
(2,988 | ) | (70 | ) | (169 | ) | (2 | ) | (94 | ) | ||||||||||
Gain
on early redemption of convertible debentures
|
1,259 | 29 | — | (100 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Gain
on sale of Comverge shares
|
— | 417 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||
Income
before taxes on income
|
(2,935 | ) | (68 | ) | (827 | ) | (10 | ) | (72 | ) | ||||||||||
Taxes
on income
|
642 | 15 | — | (100 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Income
(loss) from operations of the Company and its consolidated
subsidiaries
|
(2,293 | ) | (53 | ) | (827 | ) | (10 | ) | (64 | ) | ||||||||||
Share
of losses in Paketeria
|
(287 | ) | (7 | ) | — | (100 | ) | |||||||||||||
Share
of losses in GridSense
|
— | (129 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
(2,580 | ) | (60 | ) | (956 | ) | (11 | ) | (63 | ) | ||||||||||
Net
income attributable to non-controlling interests
|
(9 | ) | 0 | (107 | ) | (1 | ) | 1,089 | ||||||||||||
Net
loss attributable to Acorn Energy Inc.
|
$ | (2,589 | ) | (60 | ) | $ | (1,063 | ) | (13 | ) | (59 | ) |
19
Sales. Sales in
the first quarter of 2009 increased by $4.2 million or 97% from $4.3 million in
the first quarter of 2008 to $8.5 million in the first quarter of 2009. The
increase in sales is partially attributable to the inclusion of Coreworx sales
of $1.0 million in the first quarter of 2009. The balance of the increase in
sales is due to the increase in CoaLogix sales which increased by $3.1 million
(140%) to $5.4 million compared to first quarter 2008 sales of $2.2 million.
DSIT sales remained stable at $2.1 million. The increase in CoaLogix sales was
due to increased penetration in the regeneration market combined with the
ability to process more SCR modules facilitated by the completion of a plant
expansion in the fourth quarter 2008.
Gross profit. Gross profit in
the first quarter of 2009 increased by $2.0 million or 142% as compared to the
first quarter of 2008. The increase in gross profit is attributable to the
inclusion of Coreworx gross profit in the first quarter of 2009 of $0.8 million.
In addition, both CoaLogix and DSIT recorded increased gross profits of $1.1
million (an increase of 145%) and $0.1 million (an increase of 21%),
respectively. The increase in CoaLogix gross profit was wholly attributable to
the increase in CoaLogix sales; gross margins for CoaLogix remained stable at
34% for both the first quarter of 2009 and 2008. Gross margin in DSIT’s Naval
and RT Solutions segment increased from 34% in the first quarter of 2008 to 40%
in the first quarter of 2009 due to higher margin projects worked on in
2009.
Research and development
(“R&D”). R& D expenses increased from $51,000 in the first
quarter of 2008 to $276,000 in the first quarter of 2009 primarily due to the
inclusion of Coreworx’s $191,000 of development costs in 2009.
Impairments. In 2008, we
recorded a provision of $248,000 with respect to loans made to a an affiliated
company. In 2009, we recorded an impairment of $70,000 with respect to our
investment in EnerTech.
Selling, general and administrative
expenses (“SG&A”). SG&A in the first quarter of 2009
increased by $1.9 million as compared to the first quarter of 2008. A portion of
the increase is attributable to Coreworx’s SG&A costs of $1.3 million.
CoaLogix’s SG&A costs in the first quarter of 2009 increased by $0.7 million
as compared to the first quarter of 2008 reflecting increased overhead costs
resulting from the company’s growth. DSIT’s SG&A costs were relatively
unchanged. Corporate general and administrative costs decreased by $0.2 million
reflecting the effects of our efforts to reduce costs.
Gain on early redemption of
Debentures. In accordance with applicable accounting standards, we
recorded a non-cash gain of approximately $1.3 million in connection with the
January 2008 redemption of our convertible debentures.
Finance income (expense), net.
The decrease in finance expense in the first quarter of 2009 compared
with the first quarter of 2008 is due to the interest expense of $3.1 million
recorded with respect to the write-off of the remaining balances of debt
origination costs, warrants value and beneficial conversion features in the
early redemption of our convertible
debentures.
Gain on sale of Comverge
shares. In the first quarter of 2009, we sold 225,000 of our
Comverge shares of and recorded a gain of $0.4 million on proceeds of $1.6
million.
Taxes on
income. In the first quarter of 2008, we recorded an
income tax benefit of $0.6 million due to the recording of deferred tax
assets.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As of
March 31, 2009, we had working capital of $14.7 million, including $14.7 million
of non-restricted cash and cash equivalents. Our working capital includes
restricted deposits of approximately $2.0 million which we expect to be released
in the second quarter of 2009. Net cash used in the three months ended
March 31, 2009 was $0.4 million, of which approximately $1.3 million was used in
operating activities. The primary use of cash in operating activities during the
first three months of 2009 was the $1.8 and $0.2 million used by CoaLogix and
Coreworx, respectively in their operations combined with the $0.4 million of
cash used in our corporate operating activities. This was partially offset by
the $0.9 million of cash provided by operating activities from our DSIT
subsidiary.
20
Cash
provided by investing activities of $0.9 million was primarily due to the $1.4
million of proceeds from the sale of our Comverge shares during the quarter.
Those proceeds amounts were partially offset by the payment of $0.3 million for
DSIT shares as a result of the exercise of a put option at the end of 2008 and
$0.1 million for the acquisition of property and equipment.
Net cash
of $0.1 million was used in financing activities, primarily from the purchase of
treasury shares ($0.3 million) which was partially offset by new short-term
borrowings.
At March
31, 2009, DSIT had approximately $478,000 in Israeli credit lines available to
it by an Israeli bank, none of which was then being used. The line-of-credit is
subject to certain financial covenants. DSIT was in compliance with its
financial covenants at March 31, 2009. We believe that DSIT will have sufficient
liquidity to finance its activities from cash flow from its own operations over
the next 12 months. This is based on continued utilization of its
lines of credit and expected continued improvement of operating results stemming
from anticipated growth in sales. DSIT is continuing to search for additional
sources of financing to support its growth.
At March
31, 2009, CoaLogix had a $500,000 term loan and a $2 million formula based
line-of-credit available to it for utilization from a bank. At March
31, 2009, CoaLogix was utilizing $700,000 of the formula based line of credit.
Both the term loan and the line-of-credit are to finance CoaLogix’s working
capital and to finance its growth and are subject to certain
financial covenants. CoaLogix was in compliance with its financial covenants at
March 31, 2009. We believe that CoaLogix will have sufficient liquidity to
finance its operating activities from cash flow from its own operations and its
bank financing over the next 12 months.
In
anticipation of CoaLogix’s need to increase production capacity in order to
satisfy expected increased orders from customers, in April 2009, we entered into
the Purchase Agreement (see “Recent Developments”) with CoaLogix and other
parties and each party agreed to purchase shares of common stock from CoaLogix
for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $11.5
million. The Purchase Agreement provides that Acorn and others will
purchase such shares of common stock in installments as funding is needed by
CoaLogix for plant expansion, technology development, legal expenses and
computer software. The initial funding under the Purchase Agreement
was $2.1 million which was received by CoaLogix in April 2009.
In
addition to the loan of $1.0 million by us to Coreworx for development of a new
project information software product for the nuclear power plant industry which
we anticipate will be made in May 2009, we continue to expect that Coreworx will
require additional working capital support in order to finance its working
capital needs in 2009. This support may be in the form of a bank line, new
investment by others, additional investment by Acorn, or a combination of the
above. There is no assurance that such support will be available from such
sources in sufficient amounts, in a timely manner and on acceptable
terms. The availability and amount of any additional investment from
us in Coreworx may be limited by the working capital needs of our corporate
activities and other operating companies
As of May
1, 2009, the Company’s corporate operations had a total of approximately $15.0
million in cash and cash equivalents (including the $2.6 million deposited in an
account as a security for a guarantee for DSIT), reflecting a $0.9 million
decrease from the balance as of March 31, 2009. The decrease from March 31, 2009
includes $1.0 million that was invested in our CoaLogix subsidiary as part of
the Purchase Agreement (see “Recent Developments”) and $0.5 million that was
transferred to EnerTech as a result of a recent capital call. These uses of cash
and cash used for our normal operating costs were partially offset by the
proceeds from the continued sales of Comverge shares and the receipt of a
Federal income tax refund of $0.2 million.
We
believe that the cash on hand plus expected the release of restricted deposits
and the cash potentially available from any sales of our holdings in Comverge as
well as cash from our subsidiaries operating activities will provide more than
sufficient liquidity to finance Acorn and its subsidiaries activities for the
foreseeable future and for the next 12 months in particular.
21
Contractual
Obligations and Commitments
Our
contractual obligations and commitments at March 31, 2009 principally include
obligations associated with our outstanding indebtedness, future minimum
operating lease obligations and potential severance obligations to Israeli
employees and are set forth in the table below.
Cash Payments Due During Year Ending March 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(amounts in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations
|
Total
|
2010
|
2011-
2012
|
2013-
2014
|
2015 and
thereafter
|
|||||||||||||||
Debt
|
$ | 3,400 | $ | 3,400 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Operating
leases
|
3,344 | 1,228 | 1,719 | 397 | — | |||||||||||||||
Potential
severance obligations to Israeli employees (1)
|
2,472 | — | — | — | 2,472 | |||||||||||||||
Investment
in EnerTech Capital Partners III L.P. (2)
|
3,850 | 3,850 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Total
contractual cash obligations
|
$ | 13,066 | $ | 8,478 | $ | 1,719 | $ | 397 | $ | 2,472 |
We expect
to finance these contractual commitments from cash on hand and cash generated
from operations.
(1)
Under Israeli law and labor agreements, DSIT is required to make severance
payments to dismissed employees and to employees leaving employment under
certain other circumstances. The obligation for severance pay benefits, as
determined by the Israeli Severance Pay Law, is based upon length of service and
ending salary. These obligations are substantially covered by regular deposits
with recognized severance pay and pension funds and by the purchase of insurance
policies. As of March 31, 2009, we accrued a total of $2.5 million
for potential severance obligations of which approximately $1.6 million was
funded with cash to insurance companies.
(2) In
August 2007, we committed to invest up to $5 million over a ten-year period in
EnerTech Capital Partners III L.P. (“EnerTech”), a proposed $250 million venture
capital fund targeting early and expansion stage energy and clean energy
technology companies that can enhance the profits of the producers and consumers
of energy.
Our
obligation under this commitment is presented as a current liability, though it
is uncertain as to when actual payments may be made. Through March 31, 2009, we
have received and funded capital calls of $1,150,000 to EnerTech. In April 2009,
we received a capital call of $500,000 from EnerTech. The capital call was
funded in April 2009, and we currently have funded $1,650,000 of our $5 million
commitment.
As noted in “Recent Developments”, on
April 8, 2009, we entered into the Purchase Agreement with CoaLogix, EnerTech
and certain members of CoaLogix’s senior management pursuant to which each of
Acorn and EnerTech agreed to purchase from CoaLogix 781,111 shares of common
stock for a purchase price of $5,624,000 and certain members of CoaLogix’s
senior management agreed to purchase 36,111 shares of common stock of CoaLogix
for an aggregate purchase price of $260,000. The Purchase Agreement
provides that Acorn, EnerTech and senior management will purchase such shares of
common stock in installments as funding is needed by CoaLogix for plant
expansion, technology development, legal expenses and computer
software. In April 2009, we funded $1,046,000 of the
$5,624,000.
22
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
In the
normal course of business, we are exposed to fluctuations in interest rates on
lines-of-credit incurred to finance our operations in Israel, whose net
utilization at March 31, 2009 stood at zero. Our non-US dollar monetary assets
and liabilities (net assets of approximately $0.1 million) in Israel are exposed
to fluctuations in exchange rates. In addition, our non-US dollar monetary
assets and liabilities (net liability of approximately $0.2 million) in Canada
at our Coreworx subsidiary are also exposed to fluctuations in exchange rates.
Furthermore, $0.7 million and $1.4 million of our backlog of projects are
contracts and orders that are denominated in NIS and linked to an Israeli
Ministry of Defense Index, and denominated in NIS, respectively.
In the
first quarter of 2009, our DSIT subsidiary began to enter into forward contracts
which did not qualify as hedging instruments under accounting principles to try
to mitigate its foreign currency exposure risks. At March 31, 2009, DSIT had
committed to selling NIS 1.1 million on a monthly basis during the period from
April 2009 to July 2009 at an exchange rate of 4.068. In addition, At March 31,
2009, DSIT had committed to purchasing GBP 110,000 in April at an exchange rate
of 1.412.
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the
end of the period covered by this Report, we carried out an evaluation, under
the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the
Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in
Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act’)). Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective at the reasonable assurance level at end of the period covered by
this report to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in the
reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) accumulated and
communicated to our management (including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer) in a timely manner, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and
forms.
Changes
in Internal Coltrol Over Financial Reporting
There was
no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the period covered by
this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
23
PART
II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
Environmental
Energy Services, Inc. v. CoaLogix, Inc.
District
of Connecticut, Case No. 3:08 CV 1237 (RNC)
On August
13, 2008, Environmental Energy Services (“EES”) filed suit against CoaLogix and
William McMahon, the president and chief executive officer of CoaLogix, in the
United States District Court for the District of Connecticut alleging claims for
tortious interference with contract, fraudulent misrepresentation, conversion,
unfair trade practices and unjust enrichment. EES’ claims arise
largely out of a series of business relationships that existed between EES,
CoaLogix and Solucorp Industries, Ltd. (“Solucorp”). Beginning in
2005, EES acquired a license to distribute certain Solucorp technology related
to the reduction of mercury emissions. Subsequently, in the fall of
2007, CoaLogix entered into separate and independent business relationships with
both Solucorp and EES. While CoaLogix’s relationship with Solucorp
matured into a licensing arrangement, a business relationship with EES, after
further investigation and due diligence, was ultimately deemed
inadvisable. EES initially alleged that CoaLogix and its CEO utilized
confidential information obtained during negotiations with EES in order to
improperly seek out and broker a deal with Solucorp in violation of EES’
contractual rights. On October 10, 2008, CoaLogix and its CEO filed a
motion to have the case transferred to the Western District of North
Carolina. Simultaneously, CoaLogix and its CEO filed motions to
extend all deadlines in the case until such time as the court has ruled on the
motion to transfer venue. Thereafter, on October 22, 2008, EES filed
an Amended Complaint dropping CoaLogix’s CEO as a defendant and removing its
claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. The Amended Complaint seeks
unspecified damages in addition to disgorgement of all revenues CoaLogix has
earned from its dealings with Solucorp. CoaLogix denies any liability
and intends to vigorously defend this lawsuit in the event that a favorable
settlement is not reached. Further, CoaLogix contends that its cost
of defense, together with any ultimate judgment, is the responsibility of
SoluCorp due to an indemnification agreement between the
companies. SoluCorp has agreed to assume the cost of defense, but has
not made a commitment regarding any ultimate judgment. The case is in the
discovery phase with depositions of parties expected to commence being taken in
June or July, 2009.
SCR-Tech
LLC v Evonik Energy Services LLC et al.
District
of Connecticut, Case No. 3:08 CV 1237 (RNC)
On July
30, 2008, SCR-Tech LLC (“SCR-Tech”), a subsidiary of CoaLogix, filed suit in
Mecklenburg County, North Carolina, Superior Court against Evonik Energy
Services LLC (“Evonik LLC”), Hans-Ulrich Hartenstein and Brigitte Hartenstein
(the “Hartensteins”), and three of Evonik LLC’s German parent companies: Evonik
Energy Services GmbH, Evonik Steag GmbH and Evonik Industries AG (the “German
Defendants”). Subsequent to the initial filing, the case was
designated as a complex business matter and transferred to the North Carolina
Business Court.
SCR-Tech’s
claims arise largely from the Hartensteins’ previous employment as officers of
SCR-Tech and the Confidentiality and Invention Assignment Agreement signed by
the Hartensteins upon termination of their employment with
SCR-Tech. Shortly after leaving SCR-Tech in late 2005, the
Hartensteins accepted positions as officers of Evonik LLC f/k/a Steag
LLC. Evonik LLC then announced that it would be opening a catalyst
regeneration facility in Kings Mountain, North Carolina. SCR-Tech
subsequently became concerned that the Hartensteins were acting in contravention
of their confidentiality agreement. After Evonik LLC refused to
engage in meaningful discussions regarding SCR-Tech’s concerns, SCR-Tech filed
suit alleging claims for breach of contract, tortious interference with
contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of fiduciary duty and
usurpation of corporate opportunity. SCR-Tech’s claims against the
German Defendants stem from Evonik LLC’s admission that its parent entities knew
of the Hartensteins’ contractual obligations to SCR-Tech and, nevertheless,
directed the actions which have been in contravention of those
obligations.
24
Subsequent
to the filing of this lawsuit, the Hartensteins filed a motion to dismiss
SCR-Tech’s claims related to breach of fiduciary duty and usurpation of
corporate opportunity, and the court dismissed these two claims effective May 6,
2009. The other claims stated against the Hartensteins in the
complaint are not affected by this ruling. Also subsequent to the
filing of this lawsuit, the German Defendants filed motions to have the German
Defendants dismissed on the basis of lack of jurisdiction and failure to state a
claim upon which relief can be granted, and on May 6, 2009 the court granted the
motion to dismiss with respect to Evonik Industries AG and denied the motion to
dismiss with respect to failure to state a claim upon which relief can be
granted. Consequently, Evonik Industries AG has been dismissed as a
defendant, and Evonik Energy Services GmbH and Evonik Steag GmbH remain
defendants in the lawsuit.
Additionally,
Evonik LLC has filed a counterclaim against SCR-Tech, for unspecified damages,
alleging trade libel, abuse of process and unfair and deceptive trade
practices. SCR-Tech vehemently denies the allegations of Evonik LLC’s
counterclaim and will vigorously defend against them. The case is in
the initial phase of discovery with interrogatory requests having been exchanged
by some of the parties.
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(c)
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The Company purchased, pursuant to its
share repurchase program, shares of the Company’s common stock as follows for
the months of January, February and March, 2009:
Period
|
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
|
Average Price
Paid Per Share
|
Total Number of
Shares Purchased
as Part of
Publicly
Announced Plan
|
Maximum
Number of
Shares That May
Yet be Purchased
Under the Plan1
|
||||||||||||
January
1, 2009 – January 31, 2009
|
59,640 | $ | 2.15 | 123,555 | 876,445 | |||||||||||
February
1, 2009 – February 28, 2009
|
45,907 | $ | 2.42 | 169,462 | 830,538 | |||||||||||
March
1, 2009 – March 31, 2009
|
40,106 | $ | 2.21 | 209,568 | 790,432 | |||||||||||
Total
|
145,653 | $ | 2.25 |
1 The
maximum number of shares that may be purchased under the share repurchase plan
is 1,000,000 shares.
25
Item
6. Exhibits.
10.1
|
Form
of Option Agreement between the Registrant and Joe B. Cogdell, Jr. dated
January 5, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.53 to the
Registrant’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009).*
|
|
10.2
|
Amendment
dated as of March 31, 2009 by and between George Morgenstern and the
Registrant to the Consulting Agreement dated as of March 9, 2006 by and
between George Morgenstern and the Registrant.*
|
|
10.3
|
Common
Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of April 8, 2009, by and among Acorn
Energy, Inc., EnerTech Capital Partners III L.P. and the other purchasers
named therein.
|
|
10.4
|
Amended
and Restated Stockholders’ Agreement,
dated as of April 8, 2009, by and among CoaLogix Inc., Acorn Energy, Inc.
and the other stockholders named therein.
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
|
32.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
|
* This
exhibit includes a management contract, compensatory plan or arrangement in
which one or more directors or executive officers of the Registrant
participate.
26
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by its principal financial
officer thereunto duly authorized.
ACORN
ENERGY, INC.
|
||
Dated: May
14, 2009
|
||
By:
|
/s/
Michael
Barth
|
|
Chief
Financial
Officer
|
27