ACURA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC - Quarter Report: 2009 September (Form 10-Q)
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20649
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
þ
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934.
|
For
the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
or
¨
|
TRANSACTION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the transition period from ______________________
to_______________________
Commission
File Number 1-10113
Acura
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
New
York
|
11-0853640
|
(State
or other Jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
616
N. North Court, Suite 120
|
|
Palatine,
Illinois
|
60067
|
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
847
705 7709
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report.)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large” filer, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting
company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer o
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting company o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of
October 23, 2009 the registrant had 42,968,521 shares of common stock, $.01 par
value, outstanding.
ACURA
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Page
|
||
PART
1 - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements (Unaudited)
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008
|
1
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
Nine
and three months ended September 30, 2009 and September 30,
2008
|
2
|
|
Consolidated
Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
Nine
months ended September 30, 2009
|
3
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
Nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008
|
4
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
5
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
10
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
16
|
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
|
||
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
16
|
Signatures
|
17
|
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1. Financial Statements
ACURA
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
UNAUDITED
(in
thousands, except par values)
September 30,
2009
|
December 31,
2008
|
|||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Current
assets
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 32,729 | $ | 30,398 | ||||
Short
term investments
|
— | 5,039 | ||||||
Collaboration
revenue receivable
|
226 | 3,529 | ||||||
Prepaid
expense and other current assets
|
364 | 431 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
13 | 2,491 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
33,332 | 41,888 | ||||||
Non-current
assets
|
||||||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
1,187 | 1,073 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 34,519 | $ | 42,961 | ||||
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ Equity
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | — | $ | 382 | ||||
Accrued
expenses
|
906 | 883 | ||||||
Deferred
program fee revenue
|
1,943 | 4,632 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
2,849 | 5,897 | ||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
||||||||
Stockholders’
equity
|
||||||||
Common
stock - $.01 par value; 100,000 shares authorized; 42,966 and 42,723
shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively
|
430 | 427 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
350,377 | 344,023 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(319,137 | ) | (307,386 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
31,670 | 37,064 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 34,519 | $ | 42,961 |
See
accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
1
ACURA
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
UNAUDITED
(in
thousands, except share and per share data)
Nine Months
Ended September 30
|
Three Months
Ended September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
Revenue
|
||||||||||||||||
Program
fee revenue
|
$ | 2,688 | $ | 23,678 | $ | 583 | $ | 1,263 | ||||||||
Milestone
revenue
|
— | 5,000 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Collaboration
revenue
|
397 | 7,971 | 225 | 2,617 | ||||||||||||
Total
revenue
|
3,085 | 36,649 | 808 | 3,880 | ||||||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
||||||||||||||||
Research
and development expenses
|
3,828 | 10,859 | 1,494 | 3,693 | ||||||||||||
Marketing,
general and administrative expenses
|
8,680 | 5,617 | 3,284 | 3,373 | ||||||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
12,508 | 16,476 | 4,778 | 7,066 | ||||||||||||
Operating
(loss) income
|
(9,423 | ) | 20,173 | (3,970 | ) | (3,186 | ) | |||||||||
Other
income (expense)
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest,
net
|
134 | 675 | 20 | 171 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
(3 | ) | 1 | — | (17 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
other income
|
131 | 676 | 20 | 154 | ||||||||||||
(Loss)
income before income tax
|
(9,292 | ) | 20,849 | (3,950 | ) | (3,032 | ) | |||||||||
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
2,459 | 3,382 | 4 | (6,180 | ) | |||||||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$ | (11,751 | ) | $ | 17,467 | $ | (3,954 | ) | $ | 3,148 | ||||||
(Loss)
earnings per share
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | (0.26 | ) | $ | 0.38 | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.07 | ||||||
Diluted
|
$ | (0.26 | ) | $ | 0.35 | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.06 | ||||||
Weighted
average shares used in computation
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
45,839 | 45,670 | 45,992 | 45,680 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
|
45,839 | 49,529 | 45,992 | 49,409 |
See
accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
2
ACURA
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
UNAUDITED
(in
thousands)
Common
Stock
Shares
|
Common
Stock
Amount
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2008
|
42,723 | $ | 427 | $ | 344,023 | $ | (307,386 | ) | $ | 37,064 | ||||||||||
Net
loss
|
— | — | — | (11,751 | ) | (11,751 | ) | |||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
— | — | 6,529 | — | 6,529 | |||||||||||||||
Exercise
of warrants
|
193 | 2 | (2 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Exercise
of options
|
50 | 1 | (173 | ) | — | (172 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance
at September 30, 2009
|
42,966 | $ | 430 | $ | 350,377 | $ | (319,137 | ) | $ | 31,670 |
See
accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
3
ACURA
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
UNAUDITED
(in
thousands, except supplemental disclosures)
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities
|
||||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$ | (11,751 | ) | $ | 17,467 | |||
Adjustments
to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by operating
activities
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
96 | 108 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
2,479 | 3,334 | ||||||
Non-cash
share-based compensation expense
|
6,529 | 2,367 | ||||||
Loss
(gain) on asset disposals
|
3 | (1 | ) | |||||
Impairment
reserve against fixed assets
|
— | (29 | ) | |||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities
|
||||||||
Collaboration
revenue receivable
|
3,304 | 361 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
91 | 1 | ||||||
Accounts
payable
|
(382 | ) | — | |||||
Accrued
expenses
|
(176 | ) | 1,750 | |||||
Deferred
program fee revenue
|
(2,688 | ) | (20,679 | ) | ||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
(2,495 | ) | 4,679 | |||||
Cash
flows from investing activities
|
||||||||
Purchase
of investments
|
— | (5,039 | ) | |||||
Investment
maturities
|
5,039 | — | ||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
(213 | ) | (135 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from asset disposals
|
— | 1 | ||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
4,826 | (5,173 | ) | |||||
Cash
flows from financing activities – proceeds from warrant
exercise
|
— | 20 | ||||||
Increase
in cash and cash equivalents
|
2,331 | (474 | ) | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
30,398 | 31,368 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 32,729 | $ | 30,894 | ||||
Cash
paid during the period for interest
|
$ | — | $ | — | ||||
Cash
paid during the period for income taxes
|
$ | 102 | $ | 47 |
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURES OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Nine Months Ended September
30, 2009
1.
|
Warrants
to purchase 391,000 shares of common stock were exercised at an exercise
price of $3.40 per share in a series of cashless exercise transactions
resulting in the issuance of 193,000 shares of common
stock.
|
2.
|
Options
to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock were exercised at an exercise
price of $1.30 per share in a cashless exercise transaction and after
withholding shares for statutory payroll taxes calculated at $173,000, the
transaction resulted in the issuance of 50,000 shares of common
stock.
|
Nine Months Ended September
30, 2008
1.
|
The
disposal of fixed assets with $52,000 net book value resulted in a $29,000
reduction in the impairment allowance recognized favorably in the
statement of operations.
|
2.
|
A
$5,022,000 valuation allowance against deferred income tax assets was
removed which resulted in an equal amount recorded as a benefit against
current income tax expense.
|
3.
|
Deferred
income tax assets of $8,356,000 were used to offset an equal amount of
current income taxes payable.
|
See
accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
4
ACURA
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER
30, 2009 AND 2008
NOTE
1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Acura
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a New York corporation, and its wholly-owned subsidiary
Acura Pharmaceutical Technologies, Inc. (the “Company” or “We”) is a specialty
pharmaceutical company engaged in research, development and manufacture of
product candidates providing abuse deterrent features and benefits utilizing our
proprietary Aversion®
Technology and other novel technologies. Our portfolio of product
candidates utilizing Aversion® Technology includes opioid analgesics intended to
effectively relieve pain and benzodiazepines intended to treat
anxiety and related disorders. Aversion® Technology is designed to
maintain the therapeutic efficacy of the product candidates while simultaneously
discouraging common methods of pharmaceutical product misuse and abuse
including:
|
·
|
intravenous
injection of dissolved tablets or
capsules;
|
|
·
|
nasal
snorting of crushed tablets or capsules;
and
|
|
·
|
intentional
swallowing of excess quantities of tablets or
capsules.
|
The
accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of the Company
were prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of
Regulation S-X and accordingly, do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion
of management, all adjustments, (consisting primarily of items of normal
recurring nature), considered necessary to present fairly the financial position
of the Company as of September 30, 2009 and results of operations and cash flows
for the three and nine months ending September 30, 2009 and 2008 have been
made. The results of operations for the three and nine
months ending September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of
results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31,
2009. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements
and footnotes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2008 included in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (“SEC”). The 2008 year-end consolidated balance sheet was derived
from the audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all
disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles. Amounts
presented have been rounded to the nearest thousand, where indicated, except per
share data and par values. No material subsequent events have
occurred since September 30, 2009 and the date of this Report that require
recognition or disclosure in this Report.
NOTE
2 – NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In May
2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASC 855-10
(formerly FAS No. 165), “Subsequent Events,” which establishes general standards
of accounting and disclosure for events that occur after the balance sheet date
but before the financial statements are issued. This new standard was effective
for interim or annual periods beginning after June 15, 2009. The
Company adopted the application of this statement and has provided the new
disclosures as required.
In June
2009, the FASB issued ASC 105-10 (formerly FAS No. 168), “The FASB
Accounting Standards Codification™ and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles – a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” (“ASC
105-10”). ASC 105-10 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the
framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial
statements of nongovernmental entities which are presented in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States (the GAAP
hierarchy). It establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ as the
source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be
applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements
in conformity with GAAP. ASC 105-10 explicitly recognizes rules and interpretive
releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under federal
securities laws as authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. ASC 105-10 is
effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after
September 15, 2009. The Company adopted this statement and has updated all
existing GAAP references to the new codification.
5
NOTE
3 – RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Research
and development (“R&D”) expenses include internal R&D activities,
external contract research organization (“CRO”) activities, and other
activities. Internal R&D activity expenses include facility overhead,
equipment and facility maintenance and repairs, depreciation, laboratory
supplies, pre-clinical laboratory experiments, depreciation, salaries, benefits,
and incentive compensation expenses. CRO activity expenses include preclinical
laboratory experiments and clinical trial studies. Other activity expenses
include clinical trial studies, regulatory consulting, and regulatory legal
counsel. Internal R&D activities and other activity expenses are charged to
operations as incurred. The Company makes payments to CROs based on
written contracts which may include advanced payments. The Company accrues CRO
and clinical trial study expenses based on work performed and the stage of
completion and relies upon estimates of these measures provided by the CRO.
Accrued CRO expenses are subject to revisions as such work and clinical trials
progress to completion. Revisions are charged or credited to R&D expense in
the period in which the facts that give rise to the revision become known.
Advance payments are amortized to expense based on work performed. At September
30, 2009 we had $0.6 million of CRO contractual obligations expected to be
incurred during the next two fiscal quarters. We had CRO contractual obligations
of $1.0 million at December 31, 2008 which was incurred and charged to R&D
expense as the clinical studies progressed during the first quarter of
2009.
NOTE
4 – REVENUE RECOGNITION AND DEFERRED PROGRAM FEE REVENUE
We
recognize revenue in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements” (“SAB
104”). We have also adopted the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force, ASC
605-25 (formerly Issue No. 00-21), “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple
Deliverables”. Revenue is recognized when there is persuasive evidence that an
arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the price is fixed and determinable,
and collection is reasonably assured.
In
connection with our License, Development and Commercialization Agreement dated
October 30, 2007 (the “King Agreement”) with King Pharmaceuticals Research and
Development, Inc. (“King”), we recognize program fee revenue, collaboration
revenue and milestone revenue.
Program
fee revenue is derived from amortized upfront payments, such as the $30.0
million upfront payment received from King in December 2007, and license fees
upon the exercise of options to license opioid analgesic product candidates
under the King Agreement. We have assigned an equal portion of the King upfront
payment to each of three product candidates identified in the King Agreement and
recognize the upfront payment as program fee revenue ratably over our estimate
of the development period for each identified product candidate. Our development
responsibilities for two of the three product candidates have been
completed. We expect to recognize the remainder of the program fee
revenue for the third product candidate ratably over its remaining development
period which we currently estimate to extend through July, 2010. In May
2008 King paid us a $3.0 million license fee upon the exercise of its option to
license a third opioid analgesic product candidate utilizing our Aversion®
Technology. We recognized program revenue fees of $0.6 million and
$1.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, and $2.7 million and $23.7 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Collaboration
revenue is derived from reimbursement by King to us of certain development and
regulatory expenses, which are invoiced quarterly in arrears, and recognized as
revenue when costs are incurred. The ongoing development and regulatory
services being provided by us to King under the King Agreement are priced at our
cost to provide such services without mark-up. We recognized
collaboration revenue of $0.2 million and $2.6 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $0.4 million and
$8.0 million for the nine months ending September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Milestone
revenue is contingent upon the achievement of certain pre-defined events in the
development of Acurox® Tablets
and other product candidates licensed to King under the King Agreement.
Milestone payments from King are recognized as revenue upon achievement of the
“at risk” milestone events, which represent the culmination of the earnings
process related to that milestone. Milestone payments are triggered either by
the results of our research and development efforts or by events external to us,
such as regulatory approval to market a product. As such, the milestones were
substantially at risk at the inception of the King Agreement, and the amounts of
the payments assigned thereto are dependent on the milestones being achieved. In
addition, upon the achievement of a milestone event, we have no future
performance obligations related to that milestone payment. Each milestone
payment is non-refundable and non-creditable when made. No milestone
revenue was recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and $5.0
million was recognized during the nine months ended September 30,
2008.
6
NOTE
5 – INCOME TAXES
The
Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method in accordance with
ASC 740-10 (formerly FAS No. 109), "Accounting for Income Taxes" (“ASC 740-10”).
Under this method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined
based on differences between financial reporting and income tax basis of assets
and liabilities and are measured using the enacted income tax rates and laws
that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.
Additionally, net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards are reported as
deferred income tax assets. The realization of deferred income tax
assets is dependent upon future earnings. ASC 740-10 requires a valuation
allowance against deferred income tax assets if, based on the weight of
available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred
income tax assets may not be realized. At September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, the Company determined that it was more likely than not that
a portion of the Company’s net operating loss carryforwards may not be realized
in the near term and accordingly a valuation allowance was provided. For the
second quarter 2009, the valuation allowance was increased by $2.5 million and
income tax expense was recognized. We made no change to the valuation allowance
in the third quarter 2009. If in the future it is determined that amounts of our
deferred income tax assets would likely be utilized, the valuation allowance
would be reduced in the period in which such determination is made and a benefit
from income taxes in such period would be recognized.
NOTE
6 – ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accrued
expenses are summarized as follows (in thousands):
Sept 30,
|
Dec 31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Payroll,
bonus, payroll taxes and employee benefits
|
$ | 405 | $ | 77 | ||||
Legal
services
|
35 | 35 | ||||||
Audit
and tax professional services
|
99 | 89 | ||||||
State
franchise taxes
|
30 | 144 | ||||||
Property
taxes
|
22 | 39 | ||||||
State
income taxes
|
— | 94 | ||||||
Clinical,
regulatory, trademark, and patent services
|
43 | 217 | ||||||
Other
fees and services
|
272 | 188 | ||||||
$ | 906 | $ | 883 |
NOTE 7 – SHARE-BASED
COMPENSATION
The
Company accounts for employee and director share-based compensation plans,
including stock options and restricted stock units (“RSU”), pursuant
to ASC 718-10 (formerly FAS 123R”) “Share-Based Payment”. The Company estimates
the fair value of share-based awards on the date of grant using an option
pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is ultimately expected
to vest is recognized as expense over the requisite service periods in the
Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations. The Company uses the straight
line method of attributing the value of share-based compensation .The Company
selected the Black-Scholes option pricing model for determining the estimated
fair value for share-based awards. The use of the Black-Scholes model
requires the use of assumptions including expected volatility, risk-free
interest rate and expected dividends. The Company estimated the volatility
factor of the market price of its stock by reviewing its historical public
market closing prices. The Company did not consider implied volatility because
there are no options traded in its stock. The risk–free interest rate
assumption is based on observed interest rates appropriate for the estimated
term of the employee stock options and restricted stock units. The dividend
yield assumption is based on the Company’s history and expectation of dividend
payouts on common stock. The expected term of the award represents the period
that the employees and directors are expected to hold the award before exercise
and issuance. Forfeitures are accounted for as they occur. We incurred
share-based compensation expense of $2.7 million and $1.5 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $6.5 million and
$2.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. As of September 30, 2009 the Company had $10.9 million of net
unrecognized share-based compensation expense related to stock option grants and
RSU awards.
7
Restricted
Stock Unit Award Plan
The
Company has a Restricted Stock Unit Award Plan (the “2005 RSU Plan”) for its
employees and non-employee directors. A RSU represents the contingent
obligation of the Company to deliver a share of its common stock to the holder
of the RSU on a distribution date. RSUs for up to 3.5 million shares of common
stock are authorized for issuance under the 2005 RSU Plan. Absent a
change of control, one-fourth of vested shares of common stock underlying an RSU
award will be distributed (after payment of $0.01 par value per share) on
January 1 of each of 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014. If a change in control occurs
(whether prior to or after 2011), an acceleration of unvested shares will occur
and all shares underlying the RSU award will be distributed at or about the time
of the change in control and any unrecognized share-based compensation expense
will be recognized.
RSU
awards of 3.3 million and 3.0 million shares were outstanding at September 30,
2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, and 3.1 million and 2.95 million
shares were vested, respectively. No awards were granted during
either of the three months ended September 30, 2009 or 2008. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, RSU awards of 0.33 million and 0.05
million were granted, respectively. The Black-Scholes values of these awards
were $2.1 million and $0.4 million respectively, which will be recognized as
share-based compensation expense over the vesting period of the awards under
straight-line amortization methods. We incurred share-based
compensation expense from all RSU awards of $0.3 million and $0.1 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $0.6
million and $0.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model to determine fair
value for the 2009 RSU awards were:
2009
|
||||
Dividend
yield
|
0.00%
|
|||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
1.30%
to 1.50%
|
|||
Volatility
|
102%
to 108%
|
|||
Forfeitures
|
0.00%
|
|||
Expected
life of RSU award
|
3.4
years
|
|||
Grant
date fair value
|
$ 5.69 to $7.10
|
As of
September 30, 2009 the Company had $1.7 million of net unrecognized share-based
compensation expense related to RSU awards. The unrecognized share-based
compensation expense will be recognized ratably over each of the various
remaining vesting periods of the unvested RSU awards, whose furthest period
extends for twenty months. The weighted average fair value of all RSU
grants is $3.77 per share of common stock underlying each RSU. As of September
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the aggregate intrinsic value of the RSU awards
outstanding and vested was $15.6 million and $21.8 million,
respectively.
Stock
Option Plans
The
Company has stock options outstanding under three stock option
plans. Our 1995 and 1998 Stock Option Plans have expired but options
granted under such plans remain outstanding under the terms of those plans. On
April 30, 2008 our shareholders approved a 2008 Stock Option Plan authorizing
the granting of options to purchase up to 6.0 million shares of the Company’s
common stock.
Stock
options to purchase 4.2 million and 3.0 million shares with a weighted-average
exercise price of $5.45 and $6.95 were outstanding at September 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively, of which 2.8 million and 2.2 million options
were vested at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively. There was no stock option activity
during the three months ending September 30, 2009 and 2008. During
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, stock options to purchase 1.3
million and 1.2 million shares of common stock having a weighted average
exercise price of $6.38 and $9.58, respectively, were granted; during the nine
months ended September 30, 2009, 0.1 million stock options were exercised at a
price of $1.30 per share; and during the nine months ended September 30, 2009
and 2008, 0.02 million and 0.05 million stock options expired, respectively. We
incurred share-based compensation expense from all stock option awards of $2.4
million and $1.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively, and $5.9 million and $2.3 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Assumptions used in the
Black-Scholes model to determine fair value for the 2009 stock option grants
were:
8
2009
|
||||
Dividend
yield
|
0.0%
|
|||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
2.4%
to 3.1%
|
|||
Average
volatility
|
124%
|
|||
Forfeitures
|
0.0%
|
|||
Expected
life of option
|
10
years
|
|||
Weighted
average grant date fair value
|
$ 6.06
|
As of
September 30, 2009 the Company had $9.2 million of net unrecognized share-based
compensation expense related to stock option grants. The unrecognized
share-based compensation expense will be recognized ratably over each of the
various remaining vesting periods of the unvested stock options, whose furthest
period extends for twenty months. Total intrinsic value of stock options
outstanding and exercisable at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $6.1
million and $10.5 million, respectively.
NOTE
8 – COMMON STOCK WARRANTS
At
September 30, 2009, the Company had outstanding common stock purchase warrants,
exercisable for an aggregate of approximately 3.5 million shares of common
stock, all of which, under certain conditions, contain cashless
exercise features. During the nine month period ended September 30, 2009,
warrants to purchase 0.4 million shares of common stock were exercised at $3.40
per share in a series of cashless exercise transactions resulting in the
issuance of 0.2 million shares of common stock. At September 30,
2009, outstanding warrants to acquire 0.1 million, 1.1 million and 2.3 million
common shares will expire if unexercised before the end of years 2010, 2013 and
2014, respectively, and have a weighted average remaining term of 4.6 years. The
exercise prices of these warrants range from $1.29 to $3.40 per share, with a
weighted average exercise price of $3.15.
NOTE 9– EARNINGS (LOSS) PER
SHARE
Computation
of basic earnings or loss per share of common stock is based upon the sum of the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding and vested RSUs outstanding
during the period. Computation of diluted earnings or loss per share
is based on the same denominator used in the basic earning or loss computation,
adjusted for the effect of additional potentially dilutive securities. Excluded
from the diluted earnings or loss per share computations for the three and nine
months ending September 30, 2009 are 8.0 million of potentially dilutive
securities, as the effect of including these securities in the
computation would be antidilutive. Accordingly, in the table below, the
denominator used in 2009 is the same for both basic and diluted
computations.
9
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
|||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share
data)
|
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||
Basic
earnings (loss) per share
|
||||||||||||||||
Numerator:
|
||||||||||||||||
Net income
(loss) allocable to common shareholder
|
$ | (11,751 | ) | $ | 17,467 | $ | (3,954 | ) | $ | 3,148 | ||||||
Denominator:
|
||||||||||||||||
Common
shares (weighted)
|
42,841 | 42,717 | 42,958 | 42,723 | ||||||||||||
Vested
RSUs (weighted)
|
2,998 | 2,953 | 3,034 | 2,957 | ||||||||||||
Weighted
average shares used in computing basic earnings (loss) per share allocable
to common shareholder
|
45,839 | 45,670 | 45,992 | 45,680 | ||||||||||||
Basic earnings
(loss) per share allocable to common shareholder
|
$ | (0.26 | ) | $ | 0.38 | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.07 | ||||||
Diluted
earnings (loss) per share
|
||||||||||||||||
Denominator:
|
||||||||||||||||
Common
shares (weighted)
|
42,841 | 42,717 | 42,958 | 42,723 | ||||||||||||
Vested
RSUs (weighted)
|
2,998 | 2,953 | 3,034 | 2,957 | ||||||||||||
Common
stock options
|
— | 1,461 | — | 1,438 | ||||||||||||
Common
stock warrants
|
— | 2,398 | — | 2,291 | ||||||||||||
Weighted
average shares used in computing diluted earnings (loss) per share
allocable to common shareholder
|
45,839 | 49,529 | 45,992 | 49,409 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
earnings (loss) per share allocable to common shareholder
|
$ | (0.26 | ) | $ | 0.35 | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 0.06 | ||||||
Excluded
potentially dilutive securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Common
shares issuable (see #1 below):
|
||||||||||||||||
Nonvested
RSUs
|
270 | 37 | 270 | 37 | ||||||||||||
Common
stock options (vested and nonvested)
|
4,164 | 1,173 | 4,164 | 1,173 | ||||||||||||
Common
stock warrants
|
3,517 | — | 3,517 | — | ||||||||||||
Total
excluded dilutive common stock equivalents
|
7,951 | 1,210 | 7,951 | 1,210 |
(1)
Number of shares issuable represents those securities which were either i)
nonvested at period end or ii) were vested but antidilutive. The number of
shares is based on maximum number of shares issuable on exercise at period end.
Such amounts have not been adjusted for the treasury stock method or weighted
average outstanding calculations as required if the securities were
dilutive.
Item
2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
This
discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Company's
financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the SEC (the “2008 Annual Report”) and the
accompanying notes included elsewhere in this Report. Historical
operating results are not necessarily indicative of results in future
periods.
10
Forward
Looking Statements
Certain
statements in this Report constitute "forward-looking statements" within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such
forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to
be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The most significant of
such factors include, but are not limited to, our ability and the ability of
King Pharmaceuticals Research and Development, Inc. (“King”) (to whom we have
licensed our Aversion®
Technology for certain opioid analgesic products in the
United States, Canada and Mexico) and the ability of other
pharmaceutical companies, if any, to whom we may license our Aversion®
Technology, to obtain necessary regulatory approvals and commercialize products
utilizing Aversion®
Technology, the ability to avoid infringement of patents, trademarks and other
proprietary rights of third parties, and the ability to fulfill the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration’s (“FDA”) requirements for approving our product
candidates for commercial manufacturing and distribution in the United States,
including, without limitation, the adequacy of the results of the laboratory and
clinical studies intended to support FDA approval of our product candidates, the
adequacy of the development program for our product candidates, changes in
regulatory requirements, adverse safety findings relating to our product
candidates, the risk that the FDA may not agree with our analysis of our
clinical studies and may evaluate the results of these studies by different
methods or conclude that the results of the studies are not statistically
significant, clinically meaningful or that there were human errors in the
conduct of the studies or the risk that further studies of our product
candidates are not positive or otherwise do not support FDA approval or
commercially viable product labeling, and the uncertainties inherent in
scientific research, drug development, clinical trials and the regulatory
approval process. Other important factors that may also affect future
results include, but are not limited to: our ability to attract and retain
qualified personnel; our ability to secure and protect our patents, trademarks
and other proprietary rights; litigation or regulatory action that could require
us to pay significant damages or change the way we conduct our business; our
ability to compete successfully against current and future competitors; our
dependence on third-party suppliers of raw materials; our ability to secure U.S.
Drug Enforcement Administration ("DEA") quotas and source the active ingredients
for our products in development; difficulties or delays in clinical trials for
our product candidates or in the commercial manufacture and supply of our
products; and other risks and uncertainties detailed in this Report and in our
2008 Annual Report and our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the first and
second quarters of 2009, each as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. When used in this Report, the words "estimate," "project,"
"anticipate," "expect," "intend," "believe," and similar expressions identify
forward-looking statements.
Company
Overview
We are a
specialty pharmaceutical company engaged in research, development and
manufacture of product candidates intended to provide abuse deterrent features
and benefits utilizing our proprietary Aversion® and
Impede™ Technologies. Our opioid analgesic product
candidates are intended to effectively relieve pain
while simultaneously discouraging common methods of opioid product
misuse and abuse, including:
|
·
|
intravenous
injection of dissolved tablets or
capsules;
|
|
·
|
nasal
snorting of crushed tablets or capsules;
and
|
|
·
|
intentional
swallowing of excess quantities of tablets or
capsules.
|
In
addition to Acurox®, our lead product candidate, we (and/or our licensee, King
Pharmaceuticals Research and Development, Inc.) are developing Vycavert®
(hydrocodone bitartrate, niacin and acetaminophen), Acuracet®
(oxycodone HCl, niacin and acetaminophen) and additional undisclosed opioid
product candidates utilizing Aversion® Technology. Four opioid
product candidates are licensed to King. We are also developing an
undisclosed benzodiazepine tablet product candidate utilizing our Aversion®
Technology.
Our
research efforts continue to investigate and develop novel mechanisms to
incorporate abuse deterrent characteristics into abused and misused
pharmaceutical products. In this regard we have begun initial
laboratory testing of a new product candidate developed with our novel Impede™
Technology. Impede™ Technology is primarily intended
to inhibit the conversion of pseudoephedrine HCl (a
legally available nasal decongestant) into methamphetamine (an illicit and
frequently abused drug).
Acurox®
Tablets
Acurox® is an
orally administered immediate release tablet containing oxycodone HCl as its
sole active analgesic ingredient. On December 30, 2008, we submitted
a 505(b)(2) NDA for Acurox® Tablets
to the FDA and on June 30, 2009 we received from the FDA a Complete
Response Letter (“CRL”) for the Acurox® Tablets
NDA. The CRL raised issues regarding the potential abuse deterrent
benefits of Acurox®. On
September 2, 2009 we and King met with the FDA and agreed that the
data and evidence supporting the Acurox® Tablets
NDA would be presented to an FDA Advisory Committee. Although the FDA stated
that no new Acurox® clinical
trials are required at this time, we and King plan to initiate and complete an
additional clinical study to further assess the abuse deterrent
features of Acurox®. The FDA has not yet established a date for the Acurox® Advisory
Committee meeting and we do not expect the meeting will be convened in
2009.
11
King
License Agreement
We have
entered into a license agreement (the “King Agreement”) with King
Pharmaceuticals Research and Development, Inc. (“King”), a wholly-owned
subsidiary of King Pharmaceuticals, Inc., to develop and commercialize in the
United States, Canada and Mexico (the "King Territory") Acurox® Tablets,
Acuracet®
Tablets, Vycavert® Tablets
and a fourth undisclosed opioid analgesic product candidate utilizing our
proprietary Aversion®
Technology. King has an option to license in the King Territory
certain future opioid analgesic products developed utilizing our Aversion®
Technology.
We are
responsible, using commercially reasonable efforts, for all Acurox® Tablet
development activities through FDA approval of a 505(b)(2) NDA, for which
certain expenses are reimbursed to us by King. After NDA approval King will be
responsible for manufacturing and commercializing Acurox® Tablets
in the U.S. With respect to all other products licensed by King pursuant to the
King Agreement in all King Territories, King will be responsible, at its own
expense, for development, regulatory, manufacturing and commercialization
activities.
As of
September 30, 2009, we have received aggregate payments of $55.5 million from
King, consisting of a $30.0 million non-refundable upfront cash payment, $14.5
million in reimbursed research and development expenses relating to Acurox® Tablets,
$6.0 million in fees relating to King’s exercise of its option to license the
undisclosed opioid analgesic tablet product and Vycavert® Tablets,
and a $5.0 million milestone fee for successful achievement of the primary
endpoints for our pivotal Phase III clinical study for Acurox®
Tablets. The King Agreement provides for King to pay us: (a) a $3.0
million option exercise fee for each future opioid product candidate King
licenses, (b) up to $23 million in regulatory milestone payments for each King
licensed product candidate, including Acurox® Tablets,
in specific countries in the King Territory, and (c) a one-time $50 million
sales milestone payment upon the first attainment of an aggregate of $750
million in net sales of all of our licensed products combined in all King
Territories. In addition, for sales occurring following the one
year anniversary of the first commercial sale of the first licensed product
sold, King will pay us a royalty at one of 6 rates ranging from 5% to 25% based
on the level of combined annual net sales for all products licensed by us to
King in all King Territories, with the highest
applicable royalty rate applied to such combined annual sales. No
minimum annual fees are payable by either party under the King
Agreement.
The
foregoing description of the King Agreement contains forward-looking statements
about Acurox® Tablets,
and other product candidates pursuant to the King Agreement. As with
any pharmaceutical products under development or proposed to be developed,
substantial risks and uncertainties exist in development, regulatory review and
commercialization process. There can be no assurance that any product
developed, in whole or in part, pursuant to the King Agreement will receive
regulatory approval or prove to be commercially
successful. Accordingly, investors in the Company should recognize
that there is no assurance that the Company will receive the milestone payments
or royalty revenues described in the King Agreement or even if such milestones
are achieved, that the related products will be successfully commercialized and
that any royalty revenues payable to us by King will materialize.
Patents
and Patent Applications
In April
2007, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”), issued to us a
patent titled “Methods and Compositions for Deterring Abuse of Opioid Containing
Dosage Forms” (the “920 Patent”). The 54 allowed claims in the 920
Patent encompass certain pharmaceutical compositions intended to deter the most
common methods of prescription opioid analgesic product misuse and abuse. These
patented pharmaceutical compositions include specific opioid analgesics such as
oxycodone HCl and hydrocodone bitartrate among others.
In
January 2009, the USPTO issued to us a patent (the “402 Patent”) with 18 allowed
claims. The 402 Patent encompasses certain combinations of kappa and mu opioid receptor agonists
and other ingredients intended to deter opioid analgesic product misuse and
abuse.
In March
2009, the USPTO issued to us a patent (the “726 Patent”) with 20 allowed
claims. The 726 Patent encompasses a wider range of abuse deterrent
compositions than our 920 Patent. The USPTO previously issued to us a
Notice of Allowance for a 21st claim
in our then pending 726 Patent application. Upon consideration of a
potential interference proceeding between the then pending 726 Patent
application and a third party pending patent application, we filed with the
USPTO a Request for Continued Examination of the 726 Patent application and
cancelled one of the 21 claims in the pending
application. Subsequently the 726 Patent was issued with 20
allowed claims.
12
In
addition to our issued U.S. patents, we have filed multiple U.S. patent
applications and international patent applications relating to compositions
containing abuseable active pharmaceutical ingredients. Except for
those rights conferred in the King Agreement, we have retained all intellectual
property rights to our Aversion®
Technology, Impede Technology™ and related product candidates.
Company’s
Present Financial Condition
At
October 26, 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $32.0
million and estimate that our current cash reserves will be sufficient to fund
operations and development of Aversion® Technology and related product
candidates through at least the next 12 months. In December, 2007, we and King
Research and Development Inc., ("King") closed a License, Development and
Commercialization Agreement (the “King Agreement”) to develop and commercialize
certain opioid analgesic products utilizing our proprietary Aversion® Technology
in the United States, Canada and Mexico. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, we recognized $2.7 million of the $30.0 million upfront cash
payment received from King in December 2007 as program fee revenue and $0.4
million of collaboration revenue for reimbursement by King for our Acurox® Tablet
development and regulatory expenses. We have yet to generate any royalty
revenues from product sales. We expect to rely on our current cash
resources and additional payments that may be made under the King Agreement and
under similar license agreements with other pharmaceutical company partners, of
which there can be no assurance, in funding our continued
operations. Our cash requirements for operating activities may
increase in the future as we continue to conduct pre-clinical studies and
clinical trials for our product candidates, maintain, defend if necessary, and
expand the scope of our intellectual property, hire additional personnel, or
invest in other areas related to abuse deterrence.
Results of Operations for
the Nine Month Period Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
September 30,
|
Change
|
|||||||||||||||
($ in thousands):
|
2009
|
2008
|
Dollars
|
%
|
||||||||||||
Revenue
|
||||||||||||||||
Program
fee revenue
|
$ | 2,688 | $ | 23,678 | $ | (20,990 | ) | (89 | ) % | |||||||
Milestone
revenue
|
— | 5,000 | (5,000 | ) | (100 | ) | ||||||||||
Collaboration
revenue
|
397 | 7,971 | (7,574 | ) | (95 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
revenue
|
3,085 | 36,694 | (33,564 | ) | (92 | ) | ||||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
||||||||||||||||
Research
and development expenses
|
3,828 | 10,859 | (7,031 | ) | (65 | ) | ||||||||||
Marketing,
general and administrative expenses
|
8,680 | 5,617 | 3,063 | 55 | ||||||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
12,508 | 16,476 | (3,968 | ) | (24 | ) | ||||||||||
Operating
(loss) income
|
(9,423 | ) | 20,173 | (29,596 | ) | (147 | ) | |||||||||
Other
income (expense)
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest,
net
|
134 | 675 | (541 | ) | (80 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
(3 | ) | 1 | (4 | ) | (400 | ) | |||||||||
Total
other income
|
131 | 676 | (545 | ) | (81 | ) | ||||||||||
(Loss)
income before income tax
|
(9,292 | ) | 20,849 | (30,141 | ) | (145 | ) | |||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
2,459 | 3,382 | (923 | ) | (27 | ) | ||||||||||
Net (loss) income
|
$ | (11,751 | ) | $ | 17,467 | $ | (29,218 | ) | (167 | ) % |
Revenue
King paid us a $30.0 million upfront fee
in connection with the closing of the King Agreement in December 2007. Revenue
recognized in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 from amortization of this upfront fee
was $2.7 million and $23.7 million, respectively.
We assigned a portion of
the program fee revenue to each of three product candidates identified under the
King Agreement. Our development
responsibilities for two of the three product candidates are
complete. We expect to recognize the remainder of the
program fee revenue for the
third product candidate
ratably over its
remaining development
period which we currently estimate to extend through
July, 2010.
13
Collaboration revenue recognized in the
nine months ending September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $0.4 million and $8.0 million, respectively, for
reimbursement of our
Acurox® Tablet development
and regulatory expenses incurred pursuant to the King
Agreement. We invoice King in arrears
on a calendar quarter basis for our reimbursable development and regulatory
expenses under the King Agreement. We expect the amount and timing of
collaboration revenue to fluctuate in relation to the amount and timing of the
underlying development and
regulatory
expenses.
Operating
Expenses
Research
and development expense during the nine months ending September 30, 2009 and
2008 were for developing our product candidates and related technologies,
including costs of preclinical, clinical trials, clinical supplies and related
formulation and design costs, salaries and other personnel related expenses, and
facility costs. We incurred $1.3 million and $0.6 million of share-based
compensation expense attributable to research and development staff for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Excluding this
share-based compensation expense, we spent $7.8 million less in the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 on development,
primarily attributable to fewer clinical study costs for Acurox®
Tablets.
Marketing
expenses during the nine months ending September 30, 2009 and 2008 consisted of
Aversion®
Technology primary market data research studies. Our general and administrative
expenses primarily consisted of legal, audit and other professional fees,
corporate insurance, and payroll. We incurred $5.2 million and $1.8 million
share-based compensation expense attributable to general and administrative
staff for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Other Income
(Expense)
Other Income is principally derived from
interest on cash investments and has declined due to lower interest
rates. During
the nine
months ending September 30, 2009 and 2008, interest
income was $0.1 million and $0.7 million,
respectively.
Net
Income
(Loss)
We record
our tax provision using an assumed 40% effective tax rate. During the second
quarter 2009 we increased our deferred tax asset valuation reserve by $2.5
million and recorded a like amount as income tax expense because we were unable
to reliably predict achieving future taxable income and to utilize
such tax benefit. We sustained a loss before taxes for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 which could give rise to a tax benefit if these losses can be
utilized to offset future earnings. However because we are unable to reliably
predict achieving future taxable income we are precluded under generally
accepted accounting principles from recognizing such tax benefit and recording a
deferred tax asset on our balance sheet. Our net income for the nine month
period ended September 30, 2008 includes a tax provision of $3.4
million.
Results of Operations for
the Three Month Period Ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
September 30,
|
Change
|
|||||||||||||||
($ in thousands):
|
2009
|
2008
|
Dollars
|
%
|
||||||||||||
Revenue
|
||||||||||||||||
Program
fee revenue
|
$ | 583 | $ | 1,263 | $ | (680 | ) | (54 | ) % | |||||||
Milestone
revenue
|
— | — | (5,000 | ) | (100 | ) | ||||||||||
Collaboration
revenue
|
225 | 2,617 | (2,392 | ) | (91 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
revenue
|
808 | 3,880 | (3,072 | ) | (79 | ) | ||||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
||||||||||||||||
Research
and development expenses
|
1,494 | 3,693 | (2,199 | ) | (60 | ) | ||||||||||
Marketing,
general and administrative expenses
|
3,284 | 3,373 | (89 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
4,778 | 7,066 | (2,288 | ) | (32 | ) | ||||||||||
Operating
(loss) income
|
(3,970 | ) | (3,186 | ) | 784 | 25 | ||||||||||
Other
income (expense)
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest,
net
|
20 | 171 | (151 | ) | (88 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
|
— | (17 | ) | (17 | ) | (100 | ) | |||||||||
Total
other income
|
20 | 154 | (134 | ) | (87 | ) | ||||||||||
(Loss)
income before income tax
|
(3,950 | ) | (3,032 | ) | 918 | 30 | ||||||||||
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
4 | (6,180 | ) | (6,184 | ) | (100 | ) | |||||||||
Net (loss) income
|
$ | (3,954 | ) | $ | 3,148 | $ | (7,102 | ) | (226 | ) % |
14
Revenue
King paid us a $30.0 million upfront fee
in connection with the closing of the King Agreement in December 2007. Revenue
recognized in the three months ending September 30, 2009 and 2008 from amortization of this upfront fee
was $0.6 million and $1.3 million, respectively.
We assigned a portion of
the program fee revenue to each of three product candidates identified under the
King Agreement. Our development responsibilities for two
of the three product candidates are complete. We expect to recognize the remainder of the
program fee revenue for the
third product candidate
ratably over its
remaining development
period which we currently estimate to extend through
July, 2010.
Collaboration revenue recognized in the
three months ending September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $0.2 million and $2.6 million, respectively, for
billed reimbursement of our
Acurox® Tablet development
and regulatory expenses incurred pursuant to the King
Agreement. We invoice King in arrears
on a calendar quarter basis for our reimbursable development and regulatory
expenses under the King Agreement. We expect the amount and timing of
collaboration revenue to fluctuate in relation to the amount and timing of the
underlying research and regulatory development
expenses.
Operating
Expenses
Research
and development expense during the three months ending September 30, 2009 and
2008 were for developing our product candidates and related technologies,
including costs of preclinical, clinical trials, clinical supplies and related
formulation and design costs, salaries and other personnel related expenses, and
facility costs. We incurred $0.6 million and $0.4 million of share-based
compensation expense attributable to research and development staff for the
three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Excluding this
share-based compensation expense, we spent $2.3 million less in the three months
ended September 30, 2009 than in the same period in 2008 on development,
primarily attributable to fewer clinical study costs for Acurox®
Tablets.
Marketing
expenses during the three months ending September 30, 2009 and 2008 consisted of
Aversion®
Technology primary market data research studies. Our general and administrative
expenses primarily consisted of legal, audit and other professional fees,
corporate insurance, and payroll. We incurred $2.1 million and $1.1 million of
general and administrative share-based compensation expense for the three months
ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Excluding this share-based
compensation expense, we spent $1.1 million less in the three months ended
September 30, 2009 than in the same period in 2008 in all general,
administrative and marketing expenses.
Other Income
(Expense)
Other Income is principally derived from
interest on cash investments and has declined due to lower interest
rates. During
the three months
ending September 30, 2009 and 2008 earnings
from invested cash
were $0.02 million and $0.2 million,
respectively.
Net
Income
(Loss)
We record
our tax provision using an assumed 40% effective tax rate. We sustained a loss
before taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2009 which could give rise
to a tax benefit if these losses can be utilized to offset future
earnings. However, because we are unable to reliably predict
achieving future taxable income we are precluded under generally accepted
accounting principles from recognizing such tax benefit in the three month
statement of operations and recording a deferred tax asset our balance sheet.
Our net loss for the three month period ended September 30, 2008 includes a
recorded tax benefit of $6.2 million.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
At
September 30, 2009, the Company had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of
$32.7 million compared to $35.4 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments at December 31, 2008. The Company had working capital of $30.5
million at September 30, 2009 compared to $36.0 million at December 31, 2008.
Cash flow used in operating activities was $2.5 million for the nine month
period ended September 30, 2009 primarily representing the period’s net loss and
the recognition of deferred program fee revenue adjusted for certain non-cash
items such as deferred income taxes and charges for stock compensation, and from
the collection of the collaboration revenue receivable. Cash flow generated by
operating activities of $4.7 million for the nine months ending September 30,
2008 primarily represented the period’s net income and changes in deferred
program fee revenue, deferred income taxes, and charges for stock compensation.
The cash flow from investing activities for both periods resulted from our short
term investment purchases and maturities.
15
At
October 26, 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $32.0
million and estimate that such cash reserves will be sufficient to fund
development of Aversion® Technology product candidates and related operating
expenses at least through the next 12 months.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Note A of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements, in the Company’s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, includes a
summary of the Company's significant accounting policies and methods used in the
preparation of the financial statements. The application of these accounting
policies involves the exercise of judgment and use of assumptions as to future
uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ from these
estimates. The Company does not believe there is a consequential
likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported under different
conditions or using different assumptions. The Company's critical accounting
policies described in the 2008 Annual Report are also applicable to
2009.
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures. The Company’s
management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s
disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a–15(e)
and 15d–15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by
this Report. The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to
provide reasonable assurance that information is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported accurately and on a timely basis in the Company’s periodic reports
filed with the SEC. Based upon such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such
period, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective in
providing such reasonable assurance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a control
system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable,
not absolute assurance that it will detect or uncover failures within the
Company to disclose material information otherwise required to be set forth in
the Company’s periodic reports.
Changes
in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in
our internal controls over financial reporting during the third fiscal quarter
of 2009 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item
6. Exhibits
The exhibits required to be filed as
part of this Report are listed below.
31.1
|
Certification
of Periodic Report by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and
15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Periodic Report by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and
15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Periodic Report by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
16
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
October
26, 2009
|
ACURA
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
|
/s/ Andrew D. Reddick
|
|
Andrew
D. Reddick
|
|
President
& Chief Executive Officer
|
|
/s/ Peter A. Clemens
|
|
Peter
A. Clemens
|
|
Senior
VP & Chief Financial
Officer
|
17