ADAMS RESOURCES & ENERGY, INC. - Quarter Report: 2007 March (Form 10-Q)

Adams Resources & Energy, Inc. 10-Q 1/31/2007

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007

o	Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from ______________to

Commission File Number 1-7908

ADAMS RESOURCES & ENERGY, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		74-1753147
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

4400 Post Oak Pkwy Ste 2700 , Houston, Texas 77027

(Address of principal executive office & Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code (713) 881-3600

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 126-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES o NO x

A total of 4,217,596 shares of Common Stock were outstanding at May 10, 2007.

PART 1 - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

ADAMS RESOURCES & ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share data)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2007			2006
REVENUES:
Marketing	$	469,141		$	468,488
Transportation		13,802			14,941
Oil and gas		3,423			4,599
		486,366			488,028
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Marketing		465,649			464,530
Transportation		11,909			12,646
Oil and gas		2,888			1,197
General and administrative		2,602			2,116
Depreciation, depletion and amortization		2,491			2,042
		485,539			482,531

Operating earnings		827			5,497
Other income (expense):
Interest income		367			85
Interest expense		(31	)		(28	)
Earnings before income tax		1,163			5,554

Income tax provision		251			1,910

Net earnings	$	912		$	3,644

EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Basic and diluted net earnings
per common share	$	.22		$	.86

DIVIDENDS PER COMMON SHARE	$	-		$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

ADAMS RESOURCES & ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)

	March 31,			December 31,
	2007			2006
ASSETS

Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	21,307		$	20,668
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $239 and $225, respectively		190,867			194,097
Inventories		9,287			7,950
Risk management receivables		7,416			13,140
Income tax receivable		2,150			1,396
Prepayments		8,140			4,539

Total current assets		239,167			241,790

Property and equipment		110,699			107,221
Less - accumulated depreciation,
depletion and amortization		(66,301	)		(63,905	)
		44,398			43,316
Other assets:
Risk management assets		2,782			644
Other assets		4,000			3,537
	$	290,347		$	289,287

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	193,652		$	185,735
Risk management payables		6,278			11,897
Accrued and other liabilities		3,431			7,897
Current deferred income taxes		1,147			1,053
Total current liabilities		204,508			206,582

Long-term debt		3,000			3,000

Other liabilities:
Asset retirement obligations		1,215			1,152
Deferred income taxes and other		4,137			3,762
Risk management liabilities		2,207			423
		215,067			214,919
Commitments and contingencies (Note 5)

Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock - $1.00 par value, 960,000 shares
authorized, none outstanding		-			-
Common stock - $.10 par value, 7,500,000 shares
authorized, 4,217,596 shares outstanding		422			422
Contributed capital		11,693			11,693
Retained earnings		63,165			62,253
Total shareholders’ equity		75,280			74,368
	$	290,347		$	289,287

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

ADAMS RESOURCES & ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2007			2006
CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATIONS:
Earnings from continuing operations	$	912		$	3,644
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash
provided by operating activities -
Depreciation, depletion and amortization		2,491			2,042
Gains on property sales		-			(32	)
Impairment on non-producing oil and gas properties		219			259
Other, net		(18	)		(22	)
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable		3,230			12,916
Decrease (increase) in inventories		(1,337	)		1,123
Risk management activities		(249	)		292
Decrease (increase) in tax receivable		(754	)		470
Decrease (increase) in prepayments		(3,601	)		2,791
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable		7,594			(11,866	)
Increase (decrease) in accrued liabilities		(4,466	)		(1,276	)
Deferred income taxes		473			252

Net cash provided by operating activities		4,494			10,593

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Property and equipment additions		(3,469	)		(4,631	)
Insurance deposits		(386	)		-
Proceeds from property sales		-			32

Net cash (used in) investing activities		(3,855	)		(4,599	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net borrowings under credit agreements		-			-

Net cash used in financing activities		-			-

Increase in cash and cash equivalents		639			5,994

Cash at beginning of period		20,668			18,817

Cash at end of period	$	21,307		$	24,811

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

Interest paid during the period	$	32		$	28

Income taxes paid during the period	$	535		$	1,001

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

ADAMS RESOURCES & ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited but, in the opinion of the Company's management, include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for the fair presentation of its financial position at March 31, 2007, its results of operations and its cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations. Although the Company believes the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading, it is suggested that these consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements, and the notes thereto, included in the Company's latest annual report on Form 10-K. The interim statement of operations is not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for a full year.

Note 2 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Adams Resources & Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the "Company") after elimination of all significant intercompany accounts and transactions.

Nature of Operations

The Company is engaged in the business of crude oil, natural gas and petroleum products marketing, as well as tank truck transportation of liquid chemicals and oil and gas exploration and production. Its primary area of operation is within a 1,000-mile radius of Houston, Texas.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include any treasury bill, commercial paper, money market fund or federal funds with maturity of 30 days or less.

Inventories

Crude oil and petroleum product inventories are carried at the lower of cost or market. Petroleum products inventory includes gasoline, lubricating oils and other petroleum products purchased for resale and valued at cost determined on the first-in, first-out basis, while crude oil inventory is valued at average cost. Components of inventory are as follows (in thousands):

	March 31,		December 31,
	2007		2006

Crude oil	$	7,125	$	5,983
Petroleum products		2,162		1,967

	$	9,287	$	7,950

Property and Equipment

Expenditures for major renewals and betterments are capitalized, and expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Interest costs incurred in connection with major capital expenditures are capitalized and amortized over the lives of the related assets. When properties are retired or sold, the related cost and accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization ("DD&A") is removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in earnings.

Oil and gas exploration and development expenditures are accounted for in accordance with the successful efforts method of accounting. Direct costs of acquiring developed or undeveloped leasehold acreage, including lease bonus, brokerage and other fees, are capitalized. Exploratory drilling costs are initially capitalized until the properties are evaluated and determined to be either productive or nonproductive. Such evaluations are made on a quarterly basis. If an exploratory well is determined to be nonproductive, the capitalized costs of drilling the well are charged to expense. Costs incurred to drill and complete development wells, including dry holes, are capitalized. As of March 31, 2007, the Company had no unevaluated or suspended exploratory drilling costs.

Producing oil and gas leases, equipment and intangible drilling costs are depleted or amortized over the estimated recoverable reserves using the units-of-production method. Other property and equipment is depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated average useful lives of three to twenty years for marketing, three to fifteen years for transportation and ten to twenty years for all others.

The Company is required to periodically review long-lived assets for impairment whenever there is evidence that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. This consists of comparing the carrying value of the asset with the asset’s expected future undiscounted cash flows without interest costs. Estimates of expected future cash flows represent management’s best estimate based on reasonable and supportable assumptions. Proved oil and gas properties are reviewed for impairment on a field-by-field basis. Any impairment recognized is permanent and may not be restored. In addition, management evaluates the carrying value of non-producing properties and may deem them impaired for lack of drilling activity. Such evaluations are made on a quarterly basis. Accordingly, a $219,000 and a $259,000 impairment provision on non-producing properties was recorded in the three-month period ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

Other Assets

Other assets primarily consist of cash deposits associated with the Company’s business activities. The Company has established certain deposits to support its participation in its liability insurance program and such deposits totaled $2,661,000 and $2,275,000 as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. In addition, the Company maintains certain deposits to support the collection and remittance of state crude oil severance taxes. Such deposits totaled $818,000 and $795,000 as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.

Revenue Recognition

Commodity purchases and sales associated with the Company’s natural gas marketing activities qualify as derivative instruments under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133. Therefore, natural gas purchases and sales are recorded on a net revenue basis in the accompanying financial statements in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 02-3 “Issues Involved in Accounting for Derivative Contracts Held for Trading Purposes and Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management Activities”. In contrast, a significant portion of crude oil purchases and sales qualify, and have been designated as, normal purchases and sales. Therefore, crude oil purchases and sales are primarily recorded on a gross revenue basis in the accompanying financial statements. Those purchases and sales of crude oil that do not qualify as “normal purchases and sales” are recorded on a net revenue basis in the accompanying financial statements. For “normal purchase and sale” activities, the Company’s customers are invoiced monthly based on contractually agreed upon terms and revenue is recognized in the month in which the physical product is delivered to the customer. Where required, the Company recognizes fair value or mark-to-market gains and losses related to its natural gas and crude oil trading activities. A detailed discussion of the Company’s risk management activities is included later in this footnote.

Substantially all of the Company’s petroleum products marketing activity qualify as a “normal purchase and sale” and revenue is recognized in the period when the customer physically takes possession and title to the product upon delivery at their facility. The Company recognizes fair value or mark to market gains and losses on refined product marketing activities that do not qualify as “normal purchases and sales”.

Transportation customers are invoiced, and the related revenue is recognized as the service is provided. Oil and gas revenue from the Company’s interests in producing wells is recognized as title and physical possession of the oil and gas passes to the purchaser.

Included in marketing segment activities are the revenues and costs associated with certain crude oil buy/sell arrangements. Crude oil buy/sell arrangements result from a single contract or concurrent contracts with a single counterparty to provide for similar quantities of crude oil to be bought and sold at two different locations. Such contracts may be entered into for a variety of reasons, including to effect the transportation of the commodity, to minimize credit exposure, and to meet the competitive demands of the customer. In September 2005, the EITF of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) reached consensus in the issue of accounting for buy/sell arrangements as part of its EITF Issue No. 04-13, “Accounting for Purchases and Sales of Inventory with the Same Counterparty” (“Issue 04-13”). As part of Issue 04-13, the EITF required that all buy/sell arrangements be reflected on a net basis, such that the purchase and sale are netted and shown as either a net purchase or a net sale in the income statement. This requirement was effective for new arrangements entered into after March 31, 2006. However, the Company adopted Issue 04-13 effective January 1, 2006 so reported revenues and costs are consistent between the periods presented herein.

Earnings Per Share

The Company computes and presents earnings per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share”, which requires the presentation of basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share for potentially dilutive securities. Earnings per share are based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially dilutive common stock shares outstanding during the period. The weighted average number of shares outstanding was 4,217,596 for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. There were no potentially dilutive securities during those periods in 2007 and 2006.

Share-Based Payments

During the periods presented herein, the Company had no stock-based employee compensation plans, nor any other share-based payment arrangements.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Examples of significant estimates used in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounting for depreciation, depletion and amortization, oil and gas property impairments, the provision for bad debts, income taxes, contingencies and price risk management activities.

Price Risk Management Activities

SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, as amended by SFAS No. 137 and No. 138, establishes accounting and reporting standards that require every derivative instrument (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) to be recorded on the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value, unless the derivative qualifies and has been designated as a normal purchase or sale. Changes in fair value are recognized immediately in earnings unless the derivatives qualify for, and the Company elects, cash flow hedge accounting. The Company had no contracts designated for hedge accounting under SFAS No. 133 during any current reporting periods.

The Company’s trading and non-trading transactions give rise to market risk, which represents the potential loss that may result from a change in the market value of a particular commitment. The Company closely monitors and manages its exposure to market risk to ensure compliance with the Company’s risk management policies. Such policies are regularly assessed to ensure their appropriateness given management’s objectives, strategies and current market conditions.

Crude oil, natural gas and refined products energy trading contracts that do not qualify as “normal purchase and sales” are recorded at fair value, depending on management’s assessments of the numerous accounting standards and positions that comply with generally accepted accounting principles. The fair value of such contracts is reflected on the Company’s balance sheet as risk management assets and liabilities. The revaluation of such contracts is recognized in the Company’s results of operations. Current market price quotes from actively traded liquid markets are used in all cases to determine the contracts’ fair value. Risk management assets and liabilities are classified as short-term or long-term depending on contract terms. The estimated future net cash inflow based on market prices as of March 31, 2007 is $1,713,000, all of which will be received during the remainder of 2007 and 2008. The estimated future cash inflow approximates the net fair value recorded in the Company’s risk management assets and liabilities.

The following table illustrates the factors impacting the change in the net value of the Company’s risk management assets and liabilities for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):

	2007			2006
Net fair value on January 1,	$	1,464		$	1,781
Activity during the period
-Cash paid (received) from settled contracts		(577	)		(894	)
-Net realized gain from prior years’ contracts		-			107
-Net realized (loss) from prior years’ contracts		(144	)		-
-Net unrealized gain from prior years’ contracts		11			-
-Net unrealized (loss) from prior years’ contracts		-			(57	)
-Net unrealized gain from current year contracts		959			552
Net fair value on March 31,	$	1,713		$	1,489

Asset Retirement Obligations

SFAS No. 143 “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations” established an accounting model for accounting and reporting obligations associated with retirement of tangible long-lived assets and associated retirement costs. SFAS No. 143 requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset's retirement obligation be recorded in the period in which it is incurred and the corresponding cost capitalized by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. The liability is accreted to its then present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. If the liability is settled for an amount other than the recorded amount, a gain or loss is recognized. A summary of the recording of the estimated fair value of the Company’s asset retirement obligations is presented as follows (in thousands):

	2007		2006

Balance on January 1,	$	1,152	$	1,058
-Liabilities incurred		13		10
-Accretion of discount		50		27
-Liabilities settled		-		-
-Revisions to estimates		-		-
Balance on March 31,	$	1,215	$	1,095

In addition to an accrual for asset retirement obligations, the Company maintains $75,000 in escrow cash, which is legally restricted for the potential purpose of settling asset retirement costs in accordance with certain state regulations. Such cash deposits are included in other assets in the accompanying balance sheet.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2006, the FASB issued Financial Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (FIN 48). FIN 48 establishes standards for recognition and measurement, in the financial statements, of positions taken, or expected to be taken, by an entity in its income tax returns taking into consideration the uncertainty and judgment involved in the determination and filing of income taxes. Positions taken in an income tax return that are recognized in the financial statements must satisfy a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, assuming that the position will be examined by taxing authorities with full knowledge of all relevant information. FIN 48 also requires disclosures about positions taken by an entity in its tax returns that are not recognized in its financial statements, descriptions of open tax years by major jurisdiction and reasonably possible significant changes in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that could occur in the next twelve months.

Unrecognized tax benefits represent those tax benefits related to tax positions that have been taken or are expected to be taken in tax returns, including refund claims, that are not recognized in the financial statements because, in accordance with FIN 48, management has either measured the tax benefit at an amount less than the benefit claimed, or expected to be claimed, or concluded that it is not more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be ultimately sustained. As of January 1, 2007, the company had accrued approximately $230,000 including approximately $110,000 of potential interest and penalty applicable to certain open and unfiled state tax returns. The Company is currently working to file all open returns and expects to complete this process by year-end 2007. As the actual tax payments are made, the accrual will be reduced.

The Company adopted FIN 48 effective January 1, 2007. As discussed above, the Company has previously provided a liability accrual for open state tax returns and has no other unrecognized tax benefits. As such the adoption of FIN 48 did not impact on the Company’s results for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and the above described tax accrual items did not impact the effective tax rate as presented herein. Interest and penalties associated with income tax liabilities will be classified as income tax expense.

The earliest tax years remaining open from Federal and major states of operations are as follows:

	Earliest Open
	Tax Year

Federal		2004
Texas		2002
Louisiana		1999
Michigan		2002
Mississippi		2002
Alabama		2002
New Mexico		2002

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures related to fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 clarifies that fair value should be based on assumptions that market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy of three levels that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable data. SFAS No. 157 requires fair value measurements to be separately disclosed by level within the fair value hierarchy. The provisions of FAS No. 157 become effective beginning January 1, 2008 and management does not believe the impact of adopting SFAS 157 will be material.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”. SFAS No. 159 provides an entity with the option, at specified election dates, to measure certain financial assets and liabilities and other items at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in earnings as those changes occur. SFAS No. 159 also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements that include displaying the fair value of those assets and liabilities for which the entity elected the fair value option on the face of the balance sheet and providing management’s reasons for electing the fair value option for each eligible item. The provisions of SFAS No. 159 become effective beginning January 1, 2008 and management does not believe the impact of adopting SFAS No. 159 will be material.

Note 3 - Segment Reporting

The Company is primarily engaged in the business of marketing crude oil, natural gas and petroleum products; tank truck transportation of liquid chemicals; and oil and gas exploration and production. Information concerning the Company’s various business activities is summarized as follows (in thousands):

			Segment			Depreciation		Property and
			Operating			Depletion and		Equipment
	Revenues		Earnings (Loss)			Amortization		Additions
For the three months ended
March 31, 2007
Marketing
- Crude oil	$	430,436	$	1,784		$	147	$	228
- Natural gas		3,436		1,294			15		35
- Refined products		35,269		145			107		162
Marketing Total		469,141		3,223			269		425
Transportation		13,802		726			1,167		38
Oil and gas		3,423		(520	)		1,055		3,006
	$	486,366	$	3,429		$	2,491	$	3,469
For the three months ended
March 31, 2006
Marketing
- Crude Oil	$	427,154	$	1,461		$	207	$	1,085
- Natural gas		3,089		1,791			15		-
- Refined Products		38,245		385			99		16
Marketing Total		468,488		3,637			321		1,101
Transportation		14,941		1,171			1,124		614
Oil and gas		4,599		2,805			597		2,916
	$	488,028	$	7,613		$	2,042	$	4,631

Identifiable assets by industry segment are as follows (in thousands):

	March 31,		December 31,
	2007		2006
Marketing
- Crude oil	$	119,029	$	116,917
- Natural gas		77,041		80,346
- Refined products		17,046		16,286
Marketing Total		213,116		213,549
Transportation		22,116		23,764
Oil and gas		27,622		25,918
Other		27,493		26,056
	$	290,347	$	289,287

Intersegment sales are insignificant. Other identifiable assets are primarily corporate cash, accounts receivable, and properties not identified with any specific segment of the Company’s business. All sales by the Company occurred in the United States.

Segment operating earnings reflect revenues net of operating costs and depreciation, depletion and amortization. Segment earnings reconcile to earnings from continuing operations before income taxes as follows (in thousands):

	Three months ended
	March 31,
	2007			2006
Segment operating earnings	$	3,429		$	7,613
- General and administrative		(2,602	)		(2,116	)
Operating earnings		827			5,497
- Interest income		367			85
- Interest expense		(31	)		(28	)
Earnings before income tax	$	1,163		$	5,554

Note 4 - Transactions with Affiliates

Mr. K. S. Adams, Jr., Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and certain of his family partnerships and affiliates have participated as working interest owners with the Company’s subsidiary, Adams Resources Exploration Corporation. Mr. Adams and such affiliates participate on terms similar to those afforded other non-affiliated working interest owners. In recent years, such related party transactions generally result after the Company has first identified oil and gas prospects of interest. Typically the available dollar commitment to participate in such transactions is greater than the amount management is comfortable putting at risk. In such event, the Company first determines the percentage of the transaction it wants to obtain, which allows a related party to participate in the investment to the extent there is excess available. In those instances where there was no excess availability there has been no related party participation. Similarly, related parties are not required to participate, nor is the Company obligated to offer any such participation to a related or other party. When such related party transactions occur, they are individually reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee comprised of the independent directors on the Company’s Board of Directors. For the first quarter of 2007, the Company’s investment commitments totaled approximately $3.1 million in those oil and gas projects where a related party was also participating in such investments. As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the Company owed a combined net total of $190,681 and $146,338, respectively, to these related parties. In connection with the operation of certain oil and gas properties, the Company also charges such related parties for administrative overhead primarily as prescribed by the Council of Petroleum Accountants Society (“COPAS”) Bulletin 5. Such overhead recoveries totaled $30,033 and $28,670 in the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

David B. Hurst, Secretary of the Company, is a partner in the law firm of Chaffin & Hurst. The Company has been represented by Chaffin & Hurst since 1974 and plans to use the services of that firm in the future. Chaffin & Hurst currently leases office space from the Company. Transactions with Chaffin & Hurst are on the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unrelated entities.

The Company also enters into certain transactions in the normal course of business with other affiliated entities including direct cost reimbursement for shared phone and secretarial services. For the three month period ended March 31, 2007, the affiliated entities charged the Company $41,870 of expense reimbursement and the Company charged the affiliates $8,016 for such expense reimbursements.

Note 5 - Commitments and Contingencies

In March 2004, a suit styled Le Petit Chateau De Luxe, et. al. vs Great Southern Oil & Gas Co., et. al. was filed in the Civil District Court for Orleans Parish, Louisiana against the Company and its subsidiary, Adams Resources Exploration Corporation, among other defendants. The suit alleges that certain property in Acadia Parish, Louisiana was environmentally contaminated by oil and gas exploration and production activities during the 1970s and 1980s. An alleged amount of damage has not been specified. Management believes the Company has consistently conducted its oil and gas exploration and production activities in accordance with all environmental rules and regulations in effect at the time of operation. Management notified its insurance carrier about this claim, and thus far the insurance carrier has declined to offer coverage. The Company is litigating this matter with its insurance carrier. In any event, management does not believe the outcome of this matter will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

From time to time, as incident to its operations, the Company becomes involved in various lawsuits and/or disputes. Primarily as an operator of an extensive trucking fleet, the Company may be a party to motor vehicle accidents, worker compensation claims or other items of general liability as would be typical for the industry. Except as disclosed herein, management of the Company is presently unaware of any claims against the Company that are either outside the scope of insurance coverage, or that may exceed the level of insurance coverage, and could potentially represent a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Note 6 - Guarantees

Pursuant to arranging operating lease financing for truck tractors and tank trailers, individual subsidiaries of the Company may guarantee the lessor a minimum residual sales value upon the expiration of a lease and sale of the underlying equipment. The Companies believe the likelihood of performance under these guarantees to be remote. Aggregate guaranteed residual values for tractors and trailers under operating leases as of March 31, 2007 are as follows (in thousands):

		2007			2008			2009			2010			2011			Thereafter			Total
Lease residual values		$	-		$	304		$	1,475		$	217		$	181		$	288		$	2,465

In connection with certain contracts for the purchase and resale of branded motor fuels, the Company has received certain price discounts from its suppliers toward the purchase of gasoline and diesel fuel. Such discounts have been passed through to the Company’s customers as an incentive to offset a portion of the costs associated with offering branded motor fuels for sale to the general public. Under the terms of the supply contracts, the Company and its customers are not obligated to return the price discounts, provided the gasoline service station offering such product for sale remains as a branded station for periods ranging from three to ten years. The Company has a number of customers and stations operating under such arrangements and the Company’s customers are contractually obligated to remain a branded dealer for the required periods of time. Should the Company’s customers seek to void such contracts, the Company would be obligated to return a portion of such discounts received to its suppliers. As of March 31, 2007, the maximum amount of such potential obligation is approximately $1,797,000. Management of the Company believes its customers will adhere to their branding obligations and no such refunds will result.

Presently, the Company and its subsidiaries have no other types of guarantees outstanding that in the future would require liability recognition under the provisions of FIN 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others”.

Adams Resources & Energy, Inc. frequently issues parent guarantees of commitments resulting from the ongoing activities of its subsidiary companies. The guarantees generally result from subsidiary commodity purchase obligation, subsidiary lease commitments and subsidiary bank debt. The nature of such guarantees is to guarantee the performance of the subsidiary companies in meeting their respective underlying obligations. Except for operating lease commitments and letters of credit, all such underlying obligations are recorded on the books of the subsidiary companies and are included in the consolidated financial statements included herein. Therefore, no such obligation is recorded again on the books of the parent. The parent would only be called upon to perform under the guarantee in the event of a payment default by the applicable subsidiary company. In satisfying such obligations, the parent would first look to the assets of the defaulting subsidiary company. As of March 31, 2007, the amount of parent guaranteed obligations are as follows (in thousands):

	2007		2008		2009		2010		2011		Thereafter		Total
Bank debt	$	-	$	375	$	1,500	$	1,125	$	-	$	-	$	3,000
Operating leases		4,060		3,861		1,539		548		186		104		10,298
Lease residual values		-		304		1,475		217		181		288		2,465
Commodity purchases		25,326		-		-		-		-		-		25,326
Letters of credit		39,564		-		-		-		-		-		39,564
	$	68,950	$	4,540	$	4,514	$	1,890	$	367	$	392	$	80,653

Note 7 - Subsequent Event

In May 2007, the Company sold its interest in certain producing oil and gas properties for $15 million. This transaction will produce a one-time after tax gain of approximately $7 million during the second quarter of 2007.

Item 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Results of Operations

Marketing

Marketing segment revenues, operating earnings and depreciation are presented as follows (in thousands):

			Segment		Depreciation
			Operating		Depletion and
	Revenues		Earnings		Amortization
Period ended March 31, 2007

- Crude oil	$	430,436	$	1,784	$	147
- Natural gas		3,436		1,294		15
- Refined products		35,269		145		107
Total	$	469,141	$	3,223	$	269

Period ended March 31, 2006

- Crude Oil	$	427,154	$	1,461	$	207
- Natural gas		3,089		1,791		15
- Refined Products		38,245		385		99
Total	$	468,488	$	3,637	$	321

Marketing segment revenues result from sales of crude oil, natural gas and refined products such as gasoline and diesel. Required reporting for certain sales transactions is on a gross revenue basis as title passes to the customer, while other sales transactions are reported on a net revenue basis (i.e. the commodity acquisition cost is netted against gross sales value).

Supplemental volume and price information is as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2007		2006

Field Level Purchase Volumes - Per day ⁽¹⁾
Crude oil - barrels		58,145		66,250
Natural gas - mmbtu’s		455,200		343,000

Average Purchase Price
Crude Oil - per barrel	$	54.43	$	60.40
Natural Gas - per mmbtu	$	6.89	$	7.63

_____________________________

⁽¹⁾ Reflects the volume purchased from third parties at the oil and gas field level.

Crude oil revenues were consistent between the periods at $430 million and $427 million for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. While average crude oil prices and field level crude oil volumes were reduced during the comparative first quarter of 2007, such reductions were offset by additional crude oil purchase and sales volumes at physical trade points. Crude oil operating margins were increased in 2007 as crude oil prices rose from the $54 per barrel range in January 2007 to the $60 per barrel range in March 2007, producing a $761,000 inventory liquidation gain. A similar but lesser event occurred in the first quarter of 2006 when crude oil prices rose from the $59 per barrel range in January 2006 to the $62 per barrel range in March 2006, producing a $539,000 inventory liquidation gain. As of March 31, 2007, the Company held 119,480 barrels of crude oil inventory at an average price of $59.63 per barrel.

Natural gas sales are reported net of underlying natural gas purchase costs and thus reflect gross margin. As shown above, natural gas gross margins were increased in the first quarter of 2007 relative to 2006, while operating margins for the comparative current period were reduced to $1,294,000. This apparent contradiction results because during 2007, the Company shipped a relatively larger volume of natural gas and therefore incurred additional pipeline fees which are classified as a reduction in operating earnings. Comparative natural gas operating earnings are a function of volumes and the per unit margin afforded in the marketplace. While 2007 natural gas volumes were increased, per unit margins were reduced by the supply and demand conditions existing in the 2007 marketplace.

The refined products segment experienced reduced volumes and prices as business generally slowed during the first quarter of 2007 leading to reduced sales and operating earnings.

- Transportation

Transportation segment revenues, earnings and depreciation are as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,				Increase
	2007		2006		(Decrease)

Revenues	$	13,802	$	14,941		(7.6	)%

Operating earnings	$	726	$	1,171		(38.0	)%

Depreciation	$	1,167	$	1,124		3.8	%

Business declined for the transportation segment consistent with a general slowdown for domestic manufacturers of petrochemicals during the first quarter of 2007. While comparative transportation revenues were off 7.6 percent, operating earnings declined by 38 percent. This is the classic pattern as the impact of fixed operating expenses caused operating earnings to decline more significantly when measured in terms of a percentage. The reverse situation occurs during periods of increasing volumes and revenues.

In contrast to the quarter in general, activity for March 2007 increased to a level consistent with March 2006 and represented 40 percent of current quarter revenues and substantially all of current quarter earnings. The surge in business was caused by the Company’s spring season agricultural chemical and fertilizer business.

- Oil and Gas

Oil and gas segment revenues and operating earnings are primarily a function of crude oil and natural gas prices and volumes. Comparative amounts for revenues, operating earnings and depreciation and depletion are as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2007			2006		Increase
Revenues	$	3,423		$	4,599		(25.6	)%

Operating earnings (loss)	$	(520	)	$	2,805		(118.5	)%

Depreciation and depletion	$	1,055		$	597		76.7	%

Oil and gas segment revenues and operating earnings decreased for the three months ended March 31, 2007 as a result of reduced volumes and pricing as shown in the table below. Exploration expenses during the first quarter of 2007 were significantly increased to $1,778,000 compared to $328,000 during the first quarter of 2006, producing the current period loss. During the first quarter of 2007, the Company incurred $1,051,000 of dry hole expense, $219,000 of impairment on non-producing properties and $508,000 of seismic and geological expense.

Production volumes and price information is as follows:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2007		2006
Crude Oil
Volume - barrels		17,200		19,800
Average price per barrel	$	56.73	$	61.20

Natural gas
Volume - mcf		335,000		396,000
Average price per mcf	$	7.30	$	8.55

During the first three months of 2007, the Company participated in the drilling of nine wells. Seven of the wells were successful with one dry hole and one well converted to a salt water disposal unit. Additionally, the Company has five wells in process on March 31, 2007 with evaluation anticipated during the second quarter of 2007. Participation in the drilling of approximately 40 wells is planned for the remainder of 2007 on the Company’s prospect acreage in Alabama, Arkansas, Louisiana and Texas.

In the UK North Sea, seismic interpretation work continues on the Company’s acreage position. The Company holds a “Promote License” that does not require a commitment to drill a well. The Company plans to seek a partner to drill the initial well on a promoted basis. The Company holds a 30 percent interest in Blocks 21-1b, 21-2b, and 21-3d in the Central Section of the U.K. North Sea.

- Income tax

The provision for income taxes is based on Federal and State tax rates. The first quarter of 2007 income tax provision of $251,000 represents approximately 22 percent of earnings before income taxes compared to a normal combined Federal and State income tax rate of approximately 38 percent. Income taxes are reduced during the first quarter of 2007 because the Company anticipates an additional $422,000 federal tax deduction attributable to certain operating losses incurred in the United Kingdom that were not previously deductible in either jurisdiction.

- Outlook

Company management is currently working to develop adequate procedures and controls documentation in order to comply with the reporting and auditing requirements set forth in Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Presently, the Company’s Section 404 reporting compliance deadline may occur as early as December 31, 2007. Management has hired outside consultants and is incurring additional administrative expenses estimated to total $1 million during 2007 in order to meet this requirement. While it is the intent of the Company to meet all Section 404 compliance requirements, there are no assurances that the Company will meet all such items within the required time frames.

The operating trends occurring in the first quarter of 2007 appear to be holding steady into the second quarter. No significant variations in current operations are presently anticipated aside from the one-time gain described above and the added administrative burden to comply with Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

During the first three months of 2007, net cash provided by operating activities totaled $4,494,000 versus $10,593,000 provided by operations during the first three months of 2006. Management generally balances the cash flow requirements of the Company’s investment activity with available cash generated from operations. Over time, cash utilized for property and equipment additions, tracks with earnings from continuing operations plus the non-cash provision for depreciation, depletion and amortization. Presently, management intends to restrict investment decisions to available cash flow. Significant, if any, additions to debt are not anticipated. A summary of this relationship follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2007			2006
Earnings from continuing operations	$	912		$	3,644
Depreciation, depletion and amortization		2,491			2,042
Property and equipment additions		(3,469	)		(4,631	)

Cash available for (provided by) other uses	$	(66	)	$	1,055

Capital expenditures during the first three months of 2007 included $415,000 for marketing and transportation equipment additions and $3,006,000 in property additions associated with oil and gas exploration and production activities. For the remainder of 2007, the Company anticipates expending approximately $10 million on oil and gas exploration projects to be funded from operating cash flow and available working capital. In addition, approximately $1 million will be expended toward additional equipment purchases within the Company’s marketing and transportation businesses with funding from available cash flow.

- Banking Relationships

The Company’s primary bank loan agreement with Bank of America, N.A. provides for two separate lines of credit with interest at the bank’s prime rate minus ¼ of 1 percent. The working capital loan provides for borrowings up to $10 million based on 80 percent of eligible accounts receivable and 50 percent of eligible inventories. Available capacity under the line is calculated monthly and as of March 31, 2007 was established at $10 million. The oil and gas production loan provides for flexible borrowings subject to a borrowing base established semi-annually by the bank. The borrowing base is established at $10 million as of March 31, 2007 with no amounts outstanding at March 31, 2007. The line of credit loans are scheduled to expire on October 31, 2008, with the then present balance outstanding converting to a term loan payable in eight equal quarterly installments. As of March 31, 2007, bank debt outstanding under the Company’s two revolving credit facilities totaled $3 million and such debt was repaid in full on April 2, 2007.

The Bank of America revolving loan agreement, among other things, places certain restrictions with respect to additional borrowings and the purchase or sale of assets, as well as requiring the Company to comply with certain financial covenants, including maintaining a 1.0 to 1.0 ratio of consolidated current assets to consolidated current liabilities, maintaining a 3.0 to 1.0 ratio of pre-tax net income to interest expense, and consolidated net worth in excess of $52,471,000. Should the Company’s net worth fall below this threshold, the Company may be restricted from payment of additional cash dividends on the Company’s common stock. The Company was in compliance with these restrictions as of March 31, 2007.

The Company’s Gulfmark Energy, Inc. subsidiary maintains a separate banking relationship with BNP Paribas in order to support its crude oil purchasing activities. In addition to providing up to $60 million in letters of credit, the facility also finances up to $6 million of crude oil inventory and certain accounts receivable associated with crude oil sales. Such financing is provided on a demand note basis with interest at the bank’s prime rate plus one percent. As of March 31, 2007, the Company had $4.2 million of eligible borrowing capacity under this facility. No working capital advances were outstanding as of March 31, 2007. Letters of credit outstanding under this facility totaled approximately $32.5 million as of March 31, 2007. BNP Paribas has the right to discontinue the issuance of letters of credit under this facility without prior notification to the Company.

The Company’s Adams Resources Marketing subsidiary also maintains a separate banking relationship with BNP Paribas in order to support its natural gas purchasing activities. In addition to providing up to $25 million in letters of credit, the facility finances up to $4 million of general working capital needs. Such financing is provided on a demand note basis with interest at the bank’s prime rate plus one percent. No working capital advances were outstanding under this facility as of March 31, 2007. Letters of credit outstanding under this facility totaled $7.1 million as of March 31, 2007. Under this facility, BNP Paribas has the right to discontinue the issuance of letters of credit under this facility without prior notification to the Company.

Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates

- Fair Value Accounting

As an integral part of its marketing operation, the Company enters into certain forward commodity contracts that are required to be recorded at fair value in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” and related accounting pronouncements. Management believes this required accounting, known as mark-to-market accounting, creates variations in reported earnings and the reported earnings trend. Under mark-to-market accounting, significant levels of earnings are recognized in the period of contract initiation rather than the period when the service is provided and title passes from supplier to customer. As it affects the Company’s operation, management believes mark-to-market accounting impacts reported earnings and the presentation of financial condition in three important ways.

Gross margins, derived from certain aspects of the Company’s ongoing business, are front-ended into the period in which contracts are executed. Meanwhile, personnel and other costs associated with servicing accounts as well as substantially all risks associated with the execution of contracts are expensed as incurred during the period of physical product flow and title passage.

Mark-to-market earnings are calculated based on stated contract volumes. A significant risk associated with the Company’s business is the conversion of stated contract or planned volumes into actual physical commodity movement volumes without a loss of margin. Again the planned profit from such commodity contracts is bunched and front-ended into one period while the risk of loss associated with the difference between actual versus planned production or usage volumes falls in a subsequent period.

3.	Cash flows, by their nature, match physical movements and passage of title. Mark-to-market accounting, on the other hand, creates a divergence between reported earnings and cash flows. Management believes this complicates and confuses the picture of stated financial conditions and liquidity.

The Company attempts to mitigate the identified risks by only entering into contracts where current market quotes in actively traded, liquid markets are available to determine the fair value of contracts. In addition, substantially all of the Company’s forward contracts are less than 18 months in duration. However, the reader is cautioned to develop a full understanding of how fair value or mark-to-market accounting creates reported results that differ from those presented under conventional accrual accounting.

- Trade Accounts

Accounts receivable and accounts payable typically represent the single most significant assets and liabilities of the Company. Particularly within the Company’s energy marketing and oil and gas exploration and production operations, there is a high degree of interdependence with and reliance upon third parties (including transaction counterparties) to provide adequate information for the proper recording of amounts receivable or payable. Substantially all such third parties are larger firms providing the Company with the source documents for recording trade activity. It is commonplace for these entities to retroactively adjust or correct such documents. This typically requires the Company to either absorb, benefit from, or pass along such corrections to another third party.

Due to the volume and the complexity of transactions and the high degree of interdependence with third parties, this is a difficult area to control and manage. The Company manages this process by participating in a monthly settlement process with each of its counterparties. Ongoing account balances are monitored monthly and the Company attempts to gain the cooperation of such counterparties to reconcile outstanding balances. The Company also places great emphasis on collecting cash balances due and paying only bonafide properly supported claims. In addition, the Company maintains and monitors its bad debt allowance. Nevertheless a degree of risk always remains due to the customs and practices of the industry.

- Oil and Gas Reserve Estimate

The value of capitalized costs of oil and gas exploration and production related assets are dependent on underlying oil and gas reserve estimates. Reserve estimates are based on many subjective factors. The accuracy of reserve estimates depends on the quantity and quality of geological data, production performance data and reservoir engineering data, changing prices, as well as the skill and judgment of petroleum engineers in interpreting such data. The process of estimating reserves requires frequent revision of estimates (usually on an annual basis) as additional information becomes available. Calculation of estimated future oil and gas revenues are also based on estimates as to the timing of oil and gas production, and there is no assurance that the actual timing of production will conform to or approximate such estimates. Also, certain assumptions must be made with respect to pricing. The Company’s estimates assume prices will remain constant from the date of the engineer’s estimates, except for changes reflected under natural gas sales contracts. There can be no assurance that actual future prices will not vary as industry conditions, governmental regulation, political conditions, economic conditions, weather conditions, market uncertainty and other factors impact the market price for oil and gas.

The Company follows the successful efforts method of accounting, so only costs (including development dry hole costs) associated with producing oil and gas wells are capitalized. Estimated oil and gas reserve quantities are the basis for the rate of amortization under the Company’s units of production method for depreciating, depleting and amortizing of oil and gas properties. Estimated oil and gas reserve values also provide the standard for the Company’s periodic review of oil and gas properties for impairment.

- Contingencies

In March 2004, a suit styled Le Petit Chateau De Luxe, et. al. vs Great Southern Oil & Gas Co., et. al. was filed in the Civil District Court for Orleans Parish, Louisiana against the Company and its subsidiary, Adams Resources Exploration Corporation, among other defendants. The suit alleges that certain property in Acadia Parish, Louisiana was environmentally contaminated by oil and gas exploration and production activities during the 1970s and 1980s. An alleged amount of damage has not been specified. Management believes the Company has consistently conducted its oil and gas exploration and production activities in accordance with all environmental rules and regulations in effect at the time of operation. Management notified its insurance carrier about this claim, and thus far the insurance carrier has declined to offer coverage. The Company intends to litigate this matter with its insurance carrier. In any event, management does not believe the outcome of this matter will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

From time to time, as incident to its operations, the Company becomes involved in various accidents, lawsuits and/or disputes. Primarily as an operator of an extensive trucking fleet, the Company may be a party to motor vehicle accidents, worker compensation claims or other items of general liability as would be typical for the industry. In addition, the Company has extensive operations that must comply with a wide variety of tax laws, environmental laws and labor laws, among others. Should an incident occur, management would evaluate the claim based on its nature, the facts and circumstances and the applicability of insurance coverage. To the extent management believes that such event may impact the financial condition of the Company, management will estimate the monetary value of the claim and make appropriate accruals or disclosure as provided in the guidelines of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies”.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The Company is exposed to market risk, including adverse changes in interest rates and commodity prices.

Interest Rate Risk

Total long-term debt at March 31, 2007 included $3 million of floating rate debt. As a result, the Company’s annual interest costs fluctuate based on interest rate changes. Because the interest rate on the Company’s long-term debt is a floating rate, the fair value approximates carrying value as of March 31, 2007. A hypothetical 10 percent adverse change in the floating rate would not have had a material effect on the Company’s results of operations for the three-month period ended March 31, 2007.

Commodity Price Risk

The Company’s major market risk exposure is in the pricing applicable to its marketing and production of crude oil and natural gas. Realized pricing is primarily driven by the prevailing spot prices applicable to oil and gas. Commodity price risk in the Company’s marketing operations represents the potential loss that may result from a change in the market value of an asset or a commitment. From time to time, the Company enters into forward contracts to minimize or hedge the impact of market fluctuations on its purchases of crude oil and natural gas. The Company may also enter into price support contracts with certain customers to secure a floor price on the purchase of certain supply. In each instance, the Company locks in a separate matching price support contract with a third party in order to minimize the risk of these financial instruments. Substantially all forward contracts fall within a six-month to one-year term with no contracts extending longer than three years in duration. The Company monitors all commitments, positions and endeavors to maintain a balanced portfolio.

Certain forward contracts are recorded at fair value, depending on management’s assessments of numerous accounting standards and positions that comply with generally accepted accounting principles. The fair value of such contracts is reflected on the Company’s balance sheet as risk management assets and liabilities. The revaluation of such contracts is recognized on a net basis in the Company’s results of operations. Current market price quotes from actively traded liquid markets are used in all cases to determine the contracts’ fair value. Regarding net risk management assets, all of the presented values as of March 31, 2007 and 2006 were based on readily available market quotations. Risk management assets and liabilities are classified as short-term or long-term depending on contract terms. The estimated future net cash inflow based on applicable period end market prices is $1,713,000, all of which will be received during the remainder of 2007 and 2008. The estimated future cash inflow approximates the net fair value recorded in the Company’s risk management assets and liabilities.

The following table illustrates the factors that impacted the change in the net value of the Company’s risk management assets and liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 (in thousands):

	2007			2006
Net fair value on January 1,	$	1,464		$	1,781
Activity during the period
- Cash received from settled contracts		(577	)		(894	)
- Net realized (loss) for prior years’ contracts		(144	)		-
- Net realized gain from prior years’ contracts		-			107
- Net unrealized gain from prior years’ contracts		11			-
- Net unrealized (loss) from prior years’ contracts		-			(57	)
- Net unrealized gain from current year contracts		959			552
- Net fair value on September 30,	$	1,713		$	1,489

Historically, prices received for oil and gas production have been volatile and unpredictable. Price volatility is expected to continue. From January 1, 2007 through March 31, 2007 natural gas price realizations ranged from a monthly low of $6.18 per mmbtu to a monthly high of $7.56 per mmbtu. Oil prices ranged from a low of $54.13 per barrel to a high of $60.62 per barrel during the same period. A hypothetical 10 percent adverse change in average natural gas and crude oil prices, assuming no changes in volume levels, would have reduced earnings before income taxes by approximately $1,054,000 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2007.

Forward-Looking Statements—Safe Harbor Provisions

This report for the period ended March 31, 2007 contains certain forward-looking statements intended to be covered by the safe harbors provided under Federal securities law and regulation. To the extent such statements are not recitations of historical fact, forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. In particular, statements under the captions (a) Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, (b) Liquidity and Capital Resources, (c) Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates, (d) Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk, (e) Price Risk Management Activities and (f) Commitments and Contingencies among others, contain forward-looking statements. Where the Company expresses an expectation or belief to future results or events, such expression is made in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis in fact. However, there can be no assurance that such expectation or belief will actually result or be achieved.

A number of factors could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated. Such factors include, among others, (a) general economic conditions, (b) fluctuations in hydrocarbon prices and margins, (c) variations between crude oil and natural gas contract volumes and actual delivery volumes, (d) unanticipated environmental liabilities or regulatory changes, (e) counterparty credit default, (f) inability to obtain bank and/or trade credit support, (g) availability and cost of insurance, (h) changes in tax laws, (i) the availability of capital, (j) changes in regulations, (k) results of current items of litigation, (l) uninsured items of litigation or losses, (m) uncertainty in reserve estimates and cash flows, (n) ability to replace oil and gas reserves, (o) security issues related to drivers and terminal facilities, (p) commodity price volatility, (q) demand for chemical based trucking operations and (r) successful completion of drilling activity. For more information, see the discussion under Forward-Looking Statements in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Item 4. Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely discussions regarding required disclosure. As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

During the Company’s first fiscal quarter, there have not been any changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-13(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

In March 2004, a suit styled Le Petit Chateau De Luxe, et. al. vs Great Southern Oil & Gas Co., et. al. was filed in the Civil District Court for Orleans Parish, Louisiana against the Company and its subsidiary, Adams Resources Exploration Corporation, among other defendants. The suit alleges that certain property in Acadia Parish, Louisiana was environmentally contaminated by oil and gas exploration and production activities during the 1970s and 1980s. An alleged amount of damage has not been specified. Management believes the Company has consistently conducted its oil and gas exploration and production activities in accordance with all environmental rules and regulations in effect at the time of operation. Management notified its insurance carrier about this claim, and thus far the insurance carrier has declined to offer coverage. The Company intends to litigate this matter with its insurance carrier. In any event, management does not believe the outcome of this matter will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

From time to time as incident to its operations, the Company becomes involved in various lawsuits and/or disputes. Primarily as an operator of an extensive trucking fleet, the Company may be a party to motor vehicle accidents, worker compensation claims or other items of general liability as would be typical for the industry. Except as disclosed herein, management of the Company is presently unaware of any claims against the Company that are either outside the scope of insurance coverage, or that may exceed the level of insurance coverage, and could potentially represent a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Item 1A. - There have been no material changes in the Company’s risk factors from those disclosed in the 2006 Form 10-K.

Item 2. - None

Item 3. - None

Item 4. - None

Item 5. - Other Information

On May 14, 2007, the Company sold its interest in certain oil and gas producing properties for a cash payment of $15 million. The properties are located in Louisiana and the Company anticipates recognizing a second quarter 2007 after tax gain of approximately $7 million from the sale. Cash proceeds will be used for general working capital purposes.

Item 6. Exhibits

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2	Certification of Chief Financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley of 2002

32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	ADAMS RESOURCES & ENERGY, INC
	(Registrant)



Date: May 15, 2007	By /s/K. S. Adams, Jr.
	K. S. Adams, Jr.
	Chief Executive Officer


	By /s/Frank T. Webster
	Frank T. Webster
	President & Chief Operating Officer


	By /s/Richard B. Abshire
	Richard B. Abshire
	Chief Financial Officer

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
Number	Description

31.1	Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2	Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1	Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2	Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002