Adynxx, Inc. - Annual Report: 2014 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

R ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2014

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 001-36278

Alliqua BioMedical, Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (215) 702-8550

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨  No þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨  No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ  No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files) . Yes þ  No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨  No þ

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity of the registrant held by non-affiliates, computed by reference to the closing sales price of such stock, as of June 30, 2014 was $69,113,220. (For purposes of determination of the aggregate market value, only directors, executive officers and 10% or greater shareholders have been deemed affiliates.)

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, as of February 17, 2015 was 16,825,095 shares.

ALLIQUA BIOMEDICAL, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

ITEM 1.  BUSINESS

Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements,” which include information relating to future events, future financial performance, strategies, expectations, competitive environment and regulation. Words such as “may,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “future,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate,” and similar expressions, as well as statements in future tense, identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results and may not be accurate indications of when such performance or results will actually be achieved. Forward-looking statements are based on information we have when those statements are made or our management’s good faith belief as of that time with respect to future events, and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in or suggested by the forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause such differences include, but are not limited to:

For a discussion of these and other risks that relate to our business and investing in shares of our common stock, you should carefully review the risks and uncertainties described under the heading “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this Report. The forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which any such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Our Company

We were originally formed in 1997 under the name Zeta Corporation. On April 17, 2003, we changed our name to Hepalife Technologies, Inc. and, on December 20, 2010, we changed our name to Alliqua, Inc. On May 5, 2014 we acquired Choice Therapeutics, Inc. (“Choice”), a privately held wound care company. We operate through the following wholly-owned subsidiaries: AquaMed Technologies, Inc. (“AquaMed Technologies”) and Choice.

On June 5, 2014, our shareholders approved an agreement and plan of merger between us and our wholly-owned Delaware subsidiary, Alliqua BioMedical, Inc., pursuant to which we merged with and into Alliqua BioMedical, Inc. for the sole purpose of changing our name to Alliqua BioMedical, Inc. and state of domicile from Florida to Delaware.

Recent Events

On February 2, 2015, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (as may be amended from time to time, the “Merger Agreement”) with ALQA Cedar, Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary (“Merger Sub”), Celleration, Inc. (“Celleration”) and certain representatives of the Celleration stockholders, which provides for, among other things, the merger of Celleration with and into Merger Sub, with Merger Sub continuing as the surviving corporation on the terms and conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement.

Celleration focuses on developing and commercializing therapeutic ultrasound healing technologies, including the MIST Therapy System® and UltraMIST®, which deliver noncontact low-frequency, low-intensity ultrasound to the wound bed through a saline mist.

If the merger is completed, holders of outstanding shares of Celleration common stock, holders of Celleration Series AA preferred stock and holders of in the money Celleration stock options and warrants (collectively referred to herein as the “Celleration equity holders”) will initially receive at closing, a pro rata portion of an aggregate purchase price of $30,415,000, payable in equal amounts of cash and shares of our common stock, subject to certain adjustments and escrow holdbacks. In addition, the Celleration equity holders will have the right to receive certain future contingent payments subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement. The merger is expected to close during the second quarter of 2015, subject to the receipt of any required approvals and the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions to the merger contained in the Merger Agreement. However, it is possible that factors outside the control of the parties could require the parties to complete the merger at a later time or not complete it at all.

Description of Business

Products and Services

We are developing a suite of advanced wound care solutions that we believe will enable surgeons, clinicians, and wound care practitioners to address the challenges presented by chronic and acute wounds. We are building this portfolio through targeted acquisitions and through a distribution agreement with Sorbion GmbH & Co. KG and a license agreement with Celgene Cellular Therapeutics, a subsidiary of Celgene Corporation. We have historically served as a contract manufacturer, supplying our gels to third parties who incorporate them into their own products. We also market two proprietary hydrogels primarily to the wound care segment of the health care industry.

Our commercial wound care portfolio currently consists of four product categories: Human Biologics; Antimicrobial Protection; Exudate Management; and Contract Manufacturing.

Human Biologics

On November 14, 2013 we entered into a license, marketing and development agreement with Anthrogenesis Corporation, d/b/a Celgene Cellular Therapeutics (“CCT”), an affiliate of Celgene Corporation, pursuant to which CCT granted us an exclusive, royalty-bearing license in its intellectual property related to certain placental based products, including the wound care products Extracellular Matrix (“ECM”), a suite of advanced wound management products made from extracellular matrix derived from the human placenta and Biovance®, a decellularized and dehydrated allograft produced from human amniotic membrane for the management of non-infected partial- and full-thickness wounds. The license agreement permits us to commercialize ECM and Biovance in the United States. The development and application of the intellectual property covered under the license agreement will be managed by a joint steering committee, composed of members of our Company and CCT. We pay CCT annual license fees, designated amounts when certain milestone events occur and royalties on all sales of licensed products, with such amounts being variable and contingent on various factors. On September 30, 2014 we and CCT amended the license agreement and received the right to market Biovance for podiatric and orthopedic applications. The amended license agreement also amends certain terms and the related schedule for milestone payments to CCT.

On November 14, 2013, we also entered into a supply agreement with CCT, pursuant to which CCT will supply us with our entire requirement of Biovance for distribution and sale in the United States. On April 10, 2014 we and CCT entered into an amendment to the Biovance supply agreement in order to amend the pricing schedule. On April 10, 2014, we and CCT entered into a supply agreement for ECMs, on substantially the same terms as the supply agreement for Biovance. On April 23, 2014 we initiated our sales and marketing efforts for Biovance at the Spring 2014 Symposium on Advanced Wound Care.

Biovance is commercially available under Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act, which allows “minimally manipulated” human cells, tissues, and cellular and tissue-based products (HCT/Ps) to be marketed in the United States without pre-market Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) approval (also called a ‘361 product). Biovance is derived from the placenta of normal, full-term pregnancies, therefore it is natural human tissue that contains collagen, fibronectin, and other proteins and nutrients that are essential to support wound healing. Additionally, no cells are contained in the finished product (Biovance is decellularized), which is different from other placenta-based wound care products, and this decellularization can reduce irritation and inflammation that can hamper complete wound closure. The extracellular matrix composition of Biovance forms a natural scaffold within the wound bed, which serves as a platform that is attractive to the body’s own cells which, once attached, release growth factors to signal additional components required for proper wound closure. Biovance is intended for use as a biological tissue graft for the repair of non-infected damaged tissue. It is intended for application to open traumatic wounds, complex wounds such as burns, open surgical wounds, Mohs procedure (microscopically controlled surgery for skin cancer), and chronic wounds such as diabetic, venous, arterial, pressure and other ulcers. Biovance may also be used for wounds with exposed tendon, muscle, bone or other vital structures.

While Biovance is made from amniotic membrane, products that will come from CCT’s ECM platform are derived from whole placenta, which we believe will enable greater supply, greater ease of manufacture, a lower cost of goods, and most importantly, the ability to manufacture various product “forms”, which can be more versatile than tissue-based (or ‘361) products. We expect to obtain clearance from the FDA of the ECM product line using the 510(k) medical device regulatory route in 2015, with the first of such wound care solutions entering the market after regulatory approval is obtained. CCT’s proprietary manufacturing process for its ECM-based products results in a paste-like raw material that can be finished into sheets with various shapes, sizes, and thicknesses, a powder, or a flowable matrix configuration. These different product forms can be clinically useful given the different types of wounds and different wound conditions (especially larger, deeper, and/or tunneling wounds). This next-generation line of placenta-based products is intended to address a broad range of wound types and topical wound conditions that are larger and more complex than those currently treated by Biovance.

ECM products are rich in collagen and elastin, and while they do not contain all of the components of amniotic membrane (there is little to no fibronectin or laminin), they still provide the scaffold and key nutrients needed by the body for wound healing.

Key attributes anticipated for the ECM product line include:

• they can be used off the shelf, with little to no preparation;

• no special storage condition is required;

• there is potential for large sheets (coverage of large wounds);

• no specific product orientation is required for graft placement;

• no removal required, integrates into the wound; and

• may expect more functional quality of healed tissue, e.g., limiting burn injury progression, return of appropriate pigmentation, hair growth, minimal scarring.

Antimicrobial Protection

In July 2012, we began to market two proprietary products, SilverSeal, a hydrogel wound dressing with silver coated fibers, and Hydress, an over-the-counter hydrogel wound dressing. Our SilverSeal dressing is available in two sizes and our Hydress dressing is available in one size. Both types of dressing are used to provide and maintain a moist wound environment. The benefits of these products include reduced pain, greater speed of healing and increased absorption of exudate (fluid that filters from the circulatory system into lesions or areas of inflammation). SilverSeal dressings also provide an antimicrobial barrier. Silver based wound dressings are becoming increasingly prevalent in wound care due to the recent increase of antibiotic-resistant bacteria such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, commonly known as MRSA.

In July 2013, we announced the results from a post-marketing study to assess surgical wound outcomes in patients who have undergone foot and ankle surgery. In this study, our SilverSeal dressing was shown to have a lower incidence of incision complications, including infection, and a greater reduction in scar length compared to standard petroleum-based dressing. In this study, patients who had undergone ankle and foot (including forefoot, midfoot or hindfoot) surgery were randomized to receive either SilverSeal or a standard petroleum-based dressing. Patients were monitored for three months following surgery to assess the degree of scarring and the incidence of incision complications such as superficial or deep infections or wound rupture, along the surgical suture. Of the nine incision complications observed, eight occurred in patients using the petroleum-based dressing and only one in those using SilverSeal (p=0.03). The p-value is the percentage chance that the results of a statistical nature are due to random error. Length of post-surgical scarring was also reduced to a greater extent in patients using SilverSeal compared to those with a standard petroleum-based dressing. Additional studies may be necessary to further investigate these potentially favorable results.

On May 5, 2014 we acquired all outstanding equity interest of Choice, a provider of innovative wound care products using proprietary TheraBond 3D^® Antimicrobial Barrier Systems (“TheraBond”). The TheraBond product line includes contact dressings, island dressings and wraps. Based on a proprietary and patented manufacturing process, silver is bonded to the entire surface of all fibers of the TheraBond dressing. When the TheraBond products are placed on the wound, bioactive ionic silver is released at a controlled rate. Used largely in burn care, we believe TheraBond promotes an optimal wound healing environment by creating an antimicrobial barrier that helps protect against infection. With its one-piece construction and unique struts between the contact and outer layers, TheraBond enables efficient transfer of fluid and exudate away from the wound and into an absorptive outer dressing, while providing rapid, sustained antimicrobial protection.

Exudate Management

In September 2013, we entered into a long-term agreement with Sorbion GmbH & Co. KG (“Sorbion”) to distribute the sorbion sachet S, sorbion sana and new products with hydrokinetic fibers as primary dressings. We have the exclusive rights to sell these products throughout all of the Americas. In September 2013, we also entered into an agreement with Carolon Company (“Carolon”) pursuant to which, among other things, Carolon transferred certain assets related to sorbion sachet products to us, including its saleable inventory, customer information, sales and training materials, customer orders and certain sales force members.

Intended for wound bed preparation (a comprehensive approach to removing barriers to healing and stimulating the healing process), sorbion sachet S is indicated as a primary dressing for moderately to highly exudating wounds such as surgical wounds, venous leg ulcers and diabetic ulcers. It assists in the removal of slough (dead skin tissue) and toxins, and locks bacteria into the dressing. Sorbion sachet S’s hydration response technology combines mechanically modified cellulose fibers with gelling agents; the close interaction of the two components allows for active regulation of the wound climate.

Sorbion sana is indicated as a primary wound dressing and provides another form of wound treatment. It maintains a wound climate which supports healing, supports granulation (the formation of a new connective tissue and tiny blood vessels on the surface of a wound) by protecting tissue and offers a reduction in pain during dressing changes. Sorbion sana consists of an absorbent core with hydration response technology and a three-dimensional outer cover made of polyethylene. Selected materials and an optimized manufacturing process allow the avoidance of glues and adhesives, making the sorbion sana dressings less likely to cause an allergic reaction.

Contract Manufacturing

In connection with our legacy contract manufacturing business we develop, manufacture and market high water content, electron beam cross-linked, aqueous polymer hydrogels, or gels, used for wound care, medical diagnostics, transdermal drug delivery and cosmetics. We believe that we are one of only two known manufacturers of high performance gels in the world. We specialize in custom gels by capitalizing on proprietary manufacturing technologies. Our products are manufactured using proprietary and non-proprietary mixing, coating and cross-linking technologies. Together, these technologies enable us to produce gels that can satisfy rigid tolerance specifications with respect to a wide range of physical characteristics (e.g., thickness, water content, adherence, absorption, moisture vapor transmission rate (a measure of the passage of water vapor through a substance) and release rate) while maintaining product integrity. Additionally, we have the manufacturing ability to offer broad choices in selection of liners onto which the gels are coated. Consequently, our customers are able to determine tolerances in moisture vapor transmission rate and active ingredient release rates while personalizing color and texture.

Planned Products and Services

We intend to continue to expand our existing product offerings largely through licensing of products and acquisitions. We believe that our management team will be able to successfully integrate and leverage acquired products so we will have a more comprehensive suite of wound care products. We believe acquiring a product with established sales channels would also help us market our existing products. In evaluating potential acquisition targets, we are looking for technology platforms which enhance our current products, have revenue associated with the technology where possible, and have a strong value proposition in today’s health care climate. In addition to expanding our product offerings through licenses and acquisitions, we also intend to modify our existing products through both improvements and the expansion of customer options (e.g. improvements to our liner and additional offerings in different sizes and shapes). Because our products, with the exception of the ECM suite, are already cleared by the FDA, we believe that these types of modifications can be made with minor regulatory delay. We believe that these improvements and additional options will enhance our reputation and potentially attract new customers.

On February 2, 2015, we announced that we signed the Merger agreement to acquire Celleration. Celleration’s MIST Therapy System therapeutic ultrasound platform is used for the treatment of acute and chronic wounds. Celleration’s MIST Therapy System is an FDA 501(k) cleared device that uses painless, noncontact low-frequency ultrasound to stimulate cells below the wound bed in order to promote the healing process.

Industry and Markets

According to a study by the medical market research firm Kalorama Information (“Wound Care Markets 2012”), the global market for wound care management products, which had revenues of approximately $16 billion in 2011, is expected to grow to $23 billion by 2016, which is a compound annual growth rate of 9.5% for 2011 to 2016. Growth in the worldwide wound care market will likely come from new therapies that result in decreasing healing times and subsequent cost savings and a growing focus on special populations such as diabetics and the obese. New emerging markets in countries such as China, Brazil, and India are also a major driving force behind the expected growth in the global wound care market.

We intend to target five specific markets within the wound care industry:

Sales and Marketing

We continue to focus on sales and marketing efforts in the U.S. We have restructured our senior management team with the goal of maximizing the potential for success in achieving our sales and marketing goals. We have also hired a number of senior sales and marketing executives. We believe these individuals have significant experience in our industry, selling products similar to ours. In addition, we have hired several other professionals with industry marketing experience.

As of December 31, 2014, we had a direct sales force comprised of more than 25 employees who have a background in the wound care industry. Additionally, we have developed an independent network of agents to sell our wound care products through our extensive channel reach through a network of distributors. We expect to make additional hires to the salesforce to support the achievement of our sales goals. The increase to the salesforce is also expected to be augmented by some of our target acquisitions. In addition, we have assembled a Medical Advisory Board to help us target improvements and new applications for our products and assist in our marketing efforts. We also market our advanced wound care products at conferences, trade shows and other educational events.

Customers

For the year ended December 31, 2014, one customer accounted for approximately 23% of our revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2013, two customers accounted for approximately 67% of our revenue, with one customer accounting for 51% and the other 16%. These customers are both medical device manufacturers and consumers of our contract manufacturing products. The decrease in this concentration is due to an increase in product revenue, which is consistent with our strategy. We expect that as revenues from the sales of our proprietary wound dressings increase, this concentration will continue to abate in 2015.

Proprietary Hydrogel Technologies and Manufacturing

Hydrogels are manufactured by introducing a hydrophilic polymer into water to create a feed mix. The hydrophilic polymer has a tendency to mix with or dissolve in water. The feed mix is then coated onto a liner and exposed to radiation. The polymers we use, when exposed to radiation, cross-link faster than they degrade, creating a matrix that gives the gels a solid form. Active ingredients such as prescription or over-the-counter medication, skin care or wound-healing ingredients or other materials can be added before or after cross-linking. Materials that do not survive the irradiation process, or are modified by such process, are added after the cross-linking process is completed. Once the products have been mixed and cross-linked, they form sheets that can either be delivered directly to customers or first cut and shaped according to customer or our specifications, as appropriate. We believe that many of the processes described above are proprietary to us and provide us with competitive advantages, including our production of a high quality product and our increased ability to customize products for customers.

Proprietary Mixing. We believe that we are able to manufacture hydrogel feed mixes with far greater homogeneity than those of our competitors. This manufacturing advantage is critical, especially as it relates to dosages of active ingredients. In addition, our proprietary mixing technology allows for the incorporation of sensitive materials that may degrade if subjected to other types of mixing.

Proprietary Coating. Our proprietary coating technology enables us to properly coat the gels even though the gels are extremely thick and resistant to flow. We have achieved coating tolerances that have allowed us to coat materials as thin as 0.005 of an inch with a margin for error of typically less than 5%. Thickness controls are critical with respect to the performance of many of the end products utilizing our hydrogels, including medical electrodes, transdermal delivery patches and cosmetic patches. We have also developed a coating methodology that minimizes imperfections such as wrinkling in the end product by significantly reducing line tension. We believe that our proprietary know-how allows us to manufacture high quality, consistent products which meet the standards of our customers.

Proprietary Cross-Linking Technology. We cross-link our hydrogels using an electron beam accelerator. Such linking is achieved by introducing a high energy field, created by accelerated electrons, which causes the release of hydrogen atoms and causes carbon molecule covalent bonding. The creation of longer chains of the polymer in the gel increases its molecular integrity, giving the gel characteristics that make it useful in a variety of products.

Our electron-beam cross-linking process is one of three types of cross-linking, that we are aware of, used in the industry. The other types used are ultra-violent cross-linking and chemical cross-linking. We believe that the benefits of electron beam cross-linking include:

The cross-linking of hydrogels can be further modified by varying the percent of polymer cross-linking and the way in which the high energy field is delivered. There are three variables in the use of an electron beam accelerator for cross-linking of hydrogels:

We believe that our proprietary methods of managing these three variables make it possible to produce high quality gels that can match a wide range of customer specifications.

We own and operate a Radiation Dynamics, Inc. Dynamitron IEA 1500-40 Industrial Electron Accelerator, or RDI Accelerator. The RDI Accelerator has been customized to handle the cross-linking of the type of materials we use, but can also be used for several other potential uses such as coloring gemstones and treating wire, cable and tubing. The replacement cost of the RDI Accelerator and processing equipment is estimated to be in excess of $7 million. The delivery and installation process is time-consuming, with replacement estimated to take 2.5 to 3 years. We estimate that our equipment has a useful life of approximately 20 years and provides annual production capacity in excess of 6,000 hours. We believe that its current utilization is significantly less than capacity. We are also subject to state regulation with respect to electron beam radiation services and facilities. The expansion of our business into the manufacturing and distribution of our products for consumer use will subject us to additional governmental regulation.

Competition

There are several established silver-based wound dressings and other products which are already in the marketplace that compete with SilverSeal and Therabond. These include Acticoat (sold by Smith & Nephew), Aquacel Ag (sold by ConvaTec), and Silvercel (sold by Acelity). We believe that our low cost of sales will enable us to capture market share from our competitors.

Leading competitors in the tissue-based wound care area that will compete with our Biovance and ECM products include companies such as Smith and Nephew, MiMedx Group, LLC, Organogenesis, Derma Sciences and Osiris. As the tissue-based wound care market expands, we believe our partnership with CCT for placenta-derived treatments will help grow the market overall.

However, our ability to establish sales in a market with many larger manufacturers may be difficult. We continue to recruit proven veterans of the medical device industry to leverage our product offerings into the most beneficial distribution channels. Our competitors may still have greater resources to support their products and may not allow us to take any market share from them.

We believe that our proprietary competitive manufacturing advantages, along with the high barrier to entry, including the substantial cost of acquiring an electron beam as compared to other cross-linking devices, the cost and extended time required for installing this beam, and current minimal level of competition for high performance gels, affords us the opportunity to be a leader in the applications that require tight tolerances and/or incorporate active ingredients.

Our main competitor in the high performance gel industry is Covidien plc. We believe that we are able to compete effectively with Covidien plc, primarily due to our proprietary manufacturing methods. In addition, our smaller size, as compared to Covidien plc, allows us to provide greater individualized service to our customers and make decisions as a company more quickly and efficiently. In the general hydrogel market, there are other companies producing hydrogel products that are larger than us, with greater knowledge and resources than we have. We believe that we are competitive on the basis of our low cost and high quality, as well as the other factors described above. There are manufacturers in Asia who offer similar low-cost solutions; however we believe that the quality of our product is superior.

Sources and Availability of Raw Materials; Principal Suppliers

In general, raw materials essential to our businesses are readily available from multiple sources. For reasons of quality assurance, availability, or cost effectiveness, certain components and raw materials are available only from a sole supplier. Our policy is to maintain sufficient inventory of components so that our production will not be significantly disrupted even if a particular component or material is not available for a period of time.

The Dow Chemical Company and the BASF Corporation are the principal manufacturers of the two polymers, polyethylene oxide and polyvinylpyrrolidone, respectively, that we primarily use in the manufacture of hydrogels.

Carolina Silver is the principal manufacturer utilized in production of our TheraBond dressings. Carolina Silver utilizes a proprietary and patented manufacturing process. Although we have not experienced significant production delays attributable to supply changes, we believe that developing alternative sources of supply used to make Therabond would be difficult over a short period of time.

Under our distribution agreement with Sorbion and our supply agreements with CCT, we receive finished goods from these parties. 

Because we have no direct control over these suppliers, interruptions or delays in the products and services provided by these parties may be difficult to remedy in a timely fashion. In addition, if such suppliers are unable or unwilling to deliver the necessary products or raw materials, we may be unable to redesign or adapt our technology to work without such raw materials or products or find alternative suppliers or manufacturers. In such events, we could experience interruptions, delays, increased costs or quality control problems, or be unable to sell the applicable products, all of which could have a significant adverse impact on our revenue.

Other than as discussed above, we believe that, due to the size and scale of production of our suppliers, there should be adequate supply of raw materials from our manufacturers.

Patents, Proprietary Rights and Trademarks

We own or license a number of trademarks covering the Company and its products. Our policy is to file patent applications to protect technology, inventions and improvements that are important to the development of our business. We also rely upon trade secrets and continuing technological innovations to develop and maintain our competitive position.

Our subsidiary, Alliqua Biomedical SUB, Inc., has an exclusive worldwide license to use Noble Fiber Technologies, LLC’s silver coated fibers marketed under the trademarks X-Static® and SilverSeal® in Alliqua Biomedical SUB, Inc.’s manufacture, sale, use and distribution of Hydrogel Wound Dressing identified in 510(k) K040019 and Hydrocolloid Wound Dressing identified in 510(k) K033900. We have an exclusive license until July 2021, which can be extended for consecutive renewal periods of two years after the initial term.

We are party to a long-term agreement with Sorbion GmbH & Co. KG (“Sorbion”) to distribute the Sorbion sachet S, Sorbion sana and new products with hydrokinetic fibers as primary wound dressings. We have the exclusive rights to sell these Sorbion products throughout all of the Americas. Pursuant to the Sorbion agreement, we have the right to use the trademarks related to the products for sale of the products in the applicable territory.

We are also party to a license, marketing and development agreement with CCT, pursuant to which we hold an exclusive, royalty-bearing license in CCT’s intellectual property related to certain placental based products, including ECM and Biovance, to develop and commercialize these products in the United States. The development and application of the intellectual property covered under the license agreement will be managed by a joint steering committee, composed of members of us and CCT. Following the commencement of commercial sales of the licensed products, we will pay CCT annual license fees, designated amounts when certain milestone events occur and royalties on all sales of licensed products, with such amounts being variable and contingent on various factors.

The initial term of the license agreement ends on November 14, 2023, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the termination rights under the license agreement, and will extend for additional two-year terms unless either party gives written notice within a specified period prior to the end of a term. The license agreement may be terminated (i) by CCT if we or any of our affiliates challenges the validity, enforceability or scope of certain enumerated CCT patents anywhere in the world; (ii) by either party if there is a final decree that a licensed product infringed on the intellectual property of a third party; (iii) by either party for breach and failure to cure such breach of the license agreement; or (iv) by either party if the other party is the subject of insolvency proceedings, either voluntary or involuntary. In addition, the license agreement is terminable on a product-by-product basis, and not with respect to the entire license agreement (i) by CCT in the second year of the license agreement, and by either CCT or us in the third year of the license agreement and beyond, if we fail to meet certain sales thresholds and (ii) by either party upon written notice if outside legal counsel recommends discontinuance of commercialization of a product because of significant safety, legal, or economic risk as a result of a claim, demand or action or as a result of a change in the interpretation of law by a governmental or regulatory authority.

Government Regulation

Product Regulation. Under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, medical devices are classified by the FDA into one of three classes—Class I, Class II or Class III—depending on the degree of risk associated with each medical device and the extent of control needed to ensure safety and effectiveness. While some applications of hydrogels fall under the jurisdiction of the FDA, hydrogels are generally classified as Class I exempt devices and the majority of the hydrogel products that we manufacture are thereby exempt from the FDA filing of any regulatory submissions and/or pre-market notification requirements. To the extent that any FDA regulatory submissions are required, we will be required to file these submissions and maintain all appropriate documentation. With respect to registering the manufacturing facility with the FDA under the Code of Federal Regulations, 21 CFR 820.1, Scope: Part A, it is stated that the regulation does not apply to manufacturers of component parts of finished devices. Currently, hydrogels are sold as component parts to various medical device/cosmetic manufacturers.

We believe that a number of products that our partners are developing will be classified as either Class I or Class II medical devices. Class I medical devices are subject to the FDA’s general controls, which include compliance with the applicable portions of the FDA’s Quality System Regulation, facility registration and product listing, reporting of adverse medical events, and appropriate, truthful and non-misleading labeling, advertising, and promotional materials. Class II devices are subject to the FDA’s general controls and may also be subject to other special controls as deemed necessary by the FDA to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the device. Most Class II devices require pre-market clearance by the FDA through the 510(k) pre-market notification process. When a 510(k) is required, the manufacturer must submit to the FDA a pre-market notification demonstrating that the device is “substantially equivalent” to either a device that was legally marketed prior to May 28, 1976, the date upon which the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 were enacted, or to another commercially available, similar device which was subsequently cleared through the 510(k) process. By regulation, the FDA is required to clear a 510(k) within 90 days of submission of the application. As a practical matter, clearance often takes longer.

The FDA has broad post-market regulatory and enforcement powers with respect to medical devices, similar to those for pharmaceutical products. Failure to comply with the applicable U.S. medical device regulatory requirements could result in, among other things, warning letters, fines, injunctions, consent decrees, civil penalties, repairs, replacements, refunds, recalls or seizures of products, total or partial suspension of production, the FDA’s refusal to grant future pre-market clearances or approvals, withdrawals or suspensions of current product applications, and criminal prosecution.

If there are any modifications to an approved device such as our Hydrogel Wound Dressing identified in 510(k) K040019 and Hydrocolloid Wound Dressing identified in 510(k) K033900, including changes in indication, manufacturing process or labeling or a change in a manufacturing facility, an applicant must notify the FDA, and in many cases, approval for such changes must be submitted to the FDA. Additionally, the FDA regulates post-approval promotional labeling and advertising activities to assure that such activities are being conducted in conformity with statutory and regulatory requirements. These regulations include standards or restrictions for direct-to-consumer advertising, industry-sponsored scientific and educational activities, promotional activities and off-label promotion. While physicians may prescribe for off-label uses, manufacturers may only promote for the approved indications and in accordance with the provisions of the approved label. The FDA has very broad enforcement authority under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, and failure to abide by these regulations can result in enforcement action, including the issuance of warning letters directing entities to correct deviations from FDA regulations and civil and criminal investigations and prosecutions. These activities could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

Quality Assurance Requirements. The FDA enforces regulations to ensure that the methods used in, and the facilities and controls used for, the manufacture, processing, packing and holding of drugs and medical devices conform with current good manufacturing practices. The current good manufacturing practices regulations the FDA enforces are comprehensive and cover all aspects of manufacturing operations, from receipt of raw materials to finished product distribution, insofar as they bear upon whether drugs meet all the identity, strength, quality and purity characteristics required of them. The current good manufacturing practices regulations for devices, called the Quality System Regulation, are also comprehensive and cover all aspects of device manufacture, from pre-production design validation to installation and servicing, insofar as they bear upon the safe and effective use of the device and whether the device otherwise meets the requirements of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. To assure compliance requires a continuous commitment of time, money and effort in all operational areas.

The FDA also conducts periodic inspections of drug and device facilities to assess their current good manufacturing practices status. If the FDA were to find serious non-compliant manufacturing practices during such an inspection, it could take regulatory actions that could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. With respect to domestic establishments, the FDA could initiate product seizures or in some instances require product recalls and seek to enjoin a product’s manufacture and distribution. In certain circumstances, violations could support civil penalties and criminal prosecutions. In addition, if the FDA concludes that a company is not in compliance with current good manufacturing practices requirements, sanctions may be imposed that include preventing that company from receiving the necessary licenses to export its products and classifying that company as an “unacceptable supplier”, thereby disqualifying that company from selling products to federal agencies.

We believe that we and our suppliers and outside manufacturers are currently in compliance with current good manufacturing practices requirements. We are currently registered as a device manufacturer and human tissue distributor with the FDA and we intend to register as a drug facility with the FDA when we are required to do so.

Reimbursement Legislation. Reimbursement legislation, such as Medicaid, Medicare, and other programs, govern reimbursement levels. All pharmaceutical manufacturers rebate to individual states a percentage of their revenues arising from Medicaid-reimbursed drug sales. Generic drug manufacturers currently rebate an applicable percentage of the calculated average manufacturer price marketed under abbreviated new drug applications. We believe that the federal and state governments may continue to enact measures in the future aimed at reducing the cost of drugs and devices to the public. We cannot predict the nature of such measures or their impact on our profitability.

In early 2012, we received from the Pricing, Data, Analysis, and Coding contractor for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”), the Healthcare Common Procedural Coding System, or HCPCS, codes, for use when billing for our silver based antimicrobial hydrogel dressings. HCPCS was established in 1978 to provide a standardized coding system for describing the specific items and services provided in the delivery of health care. HCPCS codes are used by Medicare and monitored by the CMS. They are based on the Current Procedural Technology codes developed by the American Medical Association. We believe that these codes will facilitate reimbursement for the use of our dressings in Medicare patients with applicable wounds.

Biovance is currently marketed in hospitals where Diagnosis Related Group Procedures are performed, and in the Veteran’s Affairs health system. Providers of outpatient services will be reimbursed for Biovance by Medicare. On October 31, 2014, Biovance was assigned a new and unique, Level II Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System product reimbursement Q code (Q4154) by CMS. The new reimbursement code took effect on January 1, 2015. We are currently pursuing reimbursement coverage for Biovance from the Medicare Reimbursement Contractors, so we can sell Biovance in outpatient markets.

Environmental Regulation. We are subject to various laws and governmental regulations concerning environmental matters and employee safety and health in the U.S. and other countries. We have made, and continue to make, significant investments to comply with these laws and regulations. We cannot predict the future capital expenditures or operating costs required to comply with environmental laws and regulations. We believe that we are currently compliant with applicable environmental, health and safety requirements in all material respects. However, we cannot assure you that current or future regulatory, governmental, or private action will not have a material adverse effect on our performance, results or financial condition.

In the future, if a loss contingency related to environmental matters, employee safety, health or conditional asset retirement obligations is recognized, we would record a liability for the obligation and it may result in a material impact on net income for the annual or interim period during which the liability is recorded. The investigation and remediation of environmental obligations generally occur over an extended period of time, and therefore we do not know if these events would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity, or cash flow, nor can we assure you that such liabilities would not have a material adverse effect on our performance, results or financial condition.

Federal and State Anti-kickback, Self-referral, False Claims and Similar Laws. Our relationships with physicians, hospitals and the marketers of our products are subject to scrutiny under various federal anti-kickback, self-referral, false claims and similar laws, often referred to collectively as healthcare fraud and abuse laws. Healthcare fraud and abuse laws are complex, and even minor, inadvertent violations can give rise to claims that the relevant law has been violated. Certain states have similar fraud and abuse laws, imposing substantial penalties for violations. Any government investigation or a finding of a violation of these laws would likely result in a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock, as well as our business, financial condition and results of operations. We believe that we are currently compliant with applicable anti-kickback, self-referral, false claims in all material respects.

Research and Development Costs

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, we incurred no research and development costs. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, we incurred research and development costs totaling $63,204. We bear our own research and development costs and do not directly pass along our research and development costs to our customers; however, we build any research and development costs into the pricing structure of our products.

We intend to commit capital resources to research and development only as our cash resources allow. We have incurred all cost associated with the launch of our proprietary products and will only require research and development expenses for product enhancements and modifications, which we do not expect to be significant.

Employees

As of December 31, 2014 we had 47 full-time employees. Of these employees, 35 are involved with finance, sales, marketing, and administration and 12 are involved with manufacturing, clinical and regulatory matters. Our employees are not represented by a labor union or other collective bargaining groups, and we consider relations with our employees to be good. We currently plan to retain and utilize the services of outside consultants for additional research, testing, regulatory, legal compliance and other services on an as needed basis.

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS

There are numerous and varied risks, known and unknown, that may prevent us from achieving our goals. You should carefully consider the risks described below and the other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the consolidated financial statements and related notes. If any of the following risks, or any other risks not described below, actually occur, it is likely that our business, financial condition, and/or operating results could be materially adversely affected. The risks and uncertainties described below include forward-looking statements and our actual results may differ from those discussed in these forward-looking statements.

Risk Relating to Our Company

We have experienced significant losses and expect losses to continue for the foreseeable future.

We have yet to establish any history of profitable operations. We have incurred annual net losses of $25,445,435 and $21,976,882, respectively, during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. As of December 31, 2014, we had an accumulated deficit of $70,042,714. We expect to incur additional operating losses for the foreseeable future. Although we expect sales and order backlogs to increase in 2015 from our existing product offerings, there can be no assurance that we will be able to achieve these revenues throughout the year or be profitable in the future.

We will require additional capital in order to execute the longer term aspects of our business plan.

The implementation of our growth strategy will continue to result in an increase in our fixed cost structure. Due to the time delay between outlays for working capital expenditures, such as costs to acquire rights to additional products, the hiring and training of sales agents and personnel, marketing costs, the purchasing of inventory, the billing and collection of revenue, the conducting of a post marketing clinical trial for Biovance, and diligence costs related to merger and acquisition activities, we expect to have a net cash outflow from operating activities and revenues from sales brought in as a result of these expenditures. Future results of operations involve significant risks and uncertainties. Factors that could affect our future operating results and cause actual results to vary materially from expectations include, but are not limited to, potential demand for our products, risks from competitors, regulatory approval of our new products, technological change, and dependence on key personnel.

In order to complete our future growth strategy, additional equity and/or debt financing will be required. If we are unable to raise additional capital or if we encounter circumstances that place unforeseen constraints on capital resources, we will be required to take even stronger measures to conserve liquidity, which may include, but are not limited to, eliminating all non-essential positions and ceasing all marketing efforts. We would have to curtail business development activities and suspend the pursuit of our business plan. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in improving revenues, reducing expenses and/or securing additional capital in sufficient amounts and on favorable terms.

There is no assurance when or if the merger will be completed and, even if the merger is successfully completed, the anticipated benefits to our stockholders may not be realized.

On February 2, 2015, we entered into the Merger Agreement, pursuant to which Celleration agreed to merge with and into Merger Sub, our wholly owned subsidiary. Completion of the merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of a number of conditions as set forth in the Merger Agreement, including without limitation the approval of the Merger Agreement by Celleration stockholders and the approval of the issuance of our common stock in the merger by our stockholders. There can be no assurance that we or Celleration will be able to satisfy the closing conditions or that closing conditions beyond our control will be satisfied or waived. The conditions to the proposed merger could prevent or delay the completion of the transaction. If the merger and the integration of the companies’ respective businesses are not completed within the expected timeframe, such delay may materially and adversely affect the synergies and other benefits that we expect to achieve as a result of the merger and could result in additional transaction costs, loss of revenue or other effects associated with uncertainty about the merger. In addition, the parties can agree at any time to terminate the Merger Agreement, even if Celleration stockholders have already adopted the Merger Agreement and thereby approved the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. Alliqua and Celleration can also terminate the Merger Agreement under other specified circumstances.

If the merger is not completed, our ongoing business could be adversely affected and we will be subject to a variety of risks associated with the failure to complete the merger, including without limitation the following:

If the merger is not completed, these risks could materially affect the market price of our common stock and our future business and financial results.

We depend on key personnel.

We believe that our success will depend, in part, upon our ability to retain the skilled personnel we have recently added and attract additional skilled personnel, which may require substantial additional funds. There can be no assurance that we will be able to find and attract additional qualified employees or retain any such personnel. Our inability to hire qualified personnel, the loss of services of our key personnel, or the loss of services of executive officers or key employees that may be hired in the future may have a material and adverse effect on our business.

Our strategic business plan may not produce the intended growth in revenue and operating income.

Our strategies include making significant investments in sales and marketing programs to achieve revenue growth and margin improvement targets. If we do not achieve the expected benefits from these investments or otherwise fail to execute on our strategic initiatives, we may not achieve the growth improvement we are targeting and our results of operations may be adversely affected.

Our acquisition strategy may not produce the intended growth in revenue and operating income.

As part of our strategy for growth, we may make acquisitions and enter into strategic alliances such as joint ventures and joint development agreements. However, we may not be able to identify suitable acquisition candidates, complete acquisitions or integrate acquisitions successfully, and our strategic alliances may not prove to be successful. Such acquisitions could reduce shareholders’ ownership, cause us to incur debt, expose us to liabilities and result in amortization expenses related to intangible assets with definite lives. In addition, acquisitions involve other risks, including diversion of management resources otherwise available for ongoing development of our business and risks associated with entering new markets with which we have limited experience or where distribution alliances with experienced distributors are not available. Our future profitability may depend in part upon our ability to further develop our resources to adapt to these new products or business areas and to identify and enter into satisfactory distribution networks. Moreover, we may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of any acquisition as rapidly as expected or at all, or the acquired business may not perform in accordance with our expectations. We may also incur significant expenditures in anticipation of an acquisition that is never realized. There can be no assurance that difficulties encountered in connection with acquisitions will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our future success depends upon market acceptance of our existing and future products.

We believe that our success will depend in part upon the acceptance of our existing and future products by the medical community, hospitals and physicians and other health care providers, third-party payers, and end-users. Such acceptance may depend upon the extent to which the medical community and end-users perceive our products as safer, more effective or cost-competitive than other similar products. Ultimately, for our new products to gain general market acceptance, it may also be necessary for us to develop marketing partners for the distribution of our products. There can be no assurance that our new products will achieve significant market acceptance on a timely basis, or at all. Failure of some or all of our future products to achieve significant market acceptance could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We are dependent on significant customers.

Historically, our contract manufacturing business has generated most of our revenue, and much of this revenue is generated from a limited number of clients, who account for a substantial percentage of our total revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2014, one customer accounted for approximately 23% of our revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2013, two customers accounted for approximately 67% of our revenue, with one customer accounting for 51% and the other 16%. These customers are both medical device manufacturers and consumers of our contract manufacturing products. The decrease in this concentration is due to an increase in product revenue, which is consistent with our strategy. We expect that as revenues from the sales of our proprietary wound dressings increase, this concentration will continue to abate in 2015. The loss of any of our significant customers would have a significant negative effect on our overall operations.

We may not be able to correctly estimate our future operating expenses, which could lead to cash shortfalls.

Our operating expenses may fluctuate significantly in the future as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control. These factors include:

If we do not accurately predict our operating expenses, we may not allocate resources appropriately, which could lead to cash shortfalls and force us to seek additional capital or curtail other projects or initiatives, all of which could have a significant negative effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We operate in a highly competitive industry and face competition from large, well-established medical device manufacturers as well as new market entrants.

Competition from other medical device companies and from research and academic institutions is intense, expected to increase, subject to rapid change and significantly affected by new product introductions and other market activities of industry participants. In addition to competing with universities and other research institutions in the development of products, technologies and processes, we compete with other companies in acquiring rights to products or technologies from those institutions. A number of factors may limit the market acceptance of our products, including the timing of regulatory approvals and market entry relative to competitive products, the availability of alternative products, the price of our products relative to alternative products, the availability of third party reimbursement and the extent of marketing efforts by third party distributors or agents that we retain. There can be no assurance that our products will receive market acceptance in a commercially viable period of time, if at all. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that we can develop products that are more effective or achieve greater market acceptance than competitive products, or that our competitors will not succeed in developing or acquiring products and technologies that are more effective than those being developed by us, that would render our products and technologies less competitive or obsolete.

Our competitors enjoy several competitive advantages over us, including some or all of the following:

Our competitors’ products will compete directly with our products. In addition, our competitors as well as new market entrants may develop or acquire new treatments, products or procedures that will compete directly or indirectly with our products. The presence of this competition in our market may lead to pricing pressure which would make it more difficult to sell our products at a price that will make us profitable or prevent us from selling our products at all. Our failure to compete effectively would have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Certain of our existing and potential future products will require FDA approval before they can be marketed in the United States.

Inherent in the development of new medical products is the potential for delay because product testing, including clinical evaluation, is required before most products can be approved for human use. With respect to medical devices, such as those that we manufacture, before a new medical device, or a new use of, or claim for, an existing product can be marketed, unless it is a Class I device, it must first receive either premarket clearance under Section 510(k) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act or premarket approval from the FDA, unless an exemption applies. In the 510(k) clearance process, the FDA must determine that the proposed device is “substantially equivalent” to a device legally on the market, known as a “predicate” device, with respect to intended use, technology and safety and effectiveness to clear the proposed device for marketing. Clinical data is sometimes required to support substantial equivalence. The premarket approval pathway requires an applicant to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the device for its intended use based, in part, on extensive data including, but not limited to, technical, preclinical, clinical trial, manufacturing and labeling data. The premarket approval process is typically required for devices that are deemed to pose the greatest risk, such as life-sustaining, life-supporting or implantable devices. Both the 510(k) and premarket approval processes can be expensive and lengthy and entail significant user fees.

Failure to comply with applicable regulatory requirements can result in, among other things, suspensions or withdrawals of approvals or clearances, seizures or recalls of products, injunctions against the manufacture, holding, distribution, marketing and sale of a product, civil and criminal sanctions. Furthermore, changes in existing regulations or the adoption of new regulations could prevent us from obtaining, or affect the timing of, future regulatory approvals. Meeting regulatory requirements and evolving government standards may delay marketing of our new products for a considerable period of time, impose costly procedures upon our activities and result in a competitive advantage to larger companies that compete against us.

We cannot assure you that the FDA or other regulatory agencies will approve any products developed by us, on a timely basis, if at all, or, if granted, that approval will not entail limiting the indicated uses for which we may market the product, which could limit the potential market for any of these products.

Changes to the FDA approval process or ongoing regulatory requirements could make it more difficult for us to obtain FDA approval of our products or comply with ongoing requirements.

Based on scientific developments, post-market experience, or other legislative or regulatory changes, the current FDA standards of review for approving new medical device products are sometimes more stringent than those that were applied in the past. For example, the FDA is currently evaluating the 510(k) process for clearing medical devices and may make substantial changes to industry requirements, including which devices are eligible for 510(k) clearance, the ability to rescind previously granted 510(k) clearances and additional requirements that may significantly impact the process.

In addition, on September 27, 2007, through passage of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007, Congress passed legislation authorizing the FDA to require companies to undertake additional post-approval studies in order to assess known or signaled potential serious safety risks and to make any labeling changes necessary to address safety risks. Congress also empowered the FDA to require companies to formulate risk evaluation and mitigation strategies to ensure a drug’s benefits outweigh its risks.

We cannot determine what effect changes in regulations or legal interpretations by the FDA or the courts, when and if promulgated or issued, may have on our business in the future. Changes could, among other things, require different labeling, monitoring of patients, interaction with physicians, education programs for patients or physicians, curtailment of necessary supplies, or limitations on product distribution. These changes, or others required by the FDA could have an adverse effect on the sales of these products. The FDA has authority to require a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy under the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 when necessary to address whether the benefits of these products continue to outweigh the risks. The evolving and complex nature of regulatory science and regulatory requirements, the broad authority and discretion of the FDA and the generally high level of regulatory oversight results in a continuing possibility that from time to time, we will be adversely affected by regulatory actions despite ongoing efforts and commitment to achieve and maintain full compliance with all regulatory requirements.

Modifications to our current products may require new marketing clearances or approvals or require us to cease marketing or recall the modified products until such clearances or approvals are obtained.

Any modification to a FDA-cleared product that could significantly affect its safety or effectiveness, or that would constitute a major change or modification in its intended use, requires a new FDA 510(k) clearance or, possibly, a premarket approval. The FDA requires every manufacturer to make its own determination as to whether a modification requires a new 510(k) clearance or premarket approval, but the FDA may review and disagree with any decision reached by the manufacturer. In the future, we may make additional modifications to our products after they have received FDA clearance or approval and, in appropriate circumstances, determine that new clearance or approval is unnecessary. Regulatory authorities may disagree with our past or future decisions not to seek new clearance or approval and may require us to obtain clearance or approval for modifications to our products. If that were to occur for a previously cleared or approved product, we may be required to cease marketing or recall the modified device until we obtain the necessary clearance or approval. Under these circumstances, we may also be subject to significant regulatory fines or other penalties. If any of the foregoing were to occur, our financial condition and results of operations could be negatively impacted.

We and our manufacturers will be required to comply with current good manufacturing practices and could be subject to suspensions or product withdrawals if found non-compliant.

The FDA regulates the facilities, processes and procedures used to manufacture and market medical products in the U.S. Manufacturing facilities must be registered with the FDA and all products made in such facilities must be manufactured in accordance with “current good manufacturing practices,” or cGMP, regulations enforced by the FDA. Compliance with cGMP regulations requires the dedication of substantial resources and requires significant expenditures. The FDA periodically inspects our manufacturing facilities and those of our subcontractors and procedures to assure compliance. The FDA may cause a suspension or withdrawal of product approvals if regulatory standards are not maintained. In the event an approved manufacturing facility for a particular drug or medical device is required by the FDA to curtail or cease operations, or otherwise becomes inoperable, or a third party contract manufacturing facility faces manufacturing problems, obtaining the required FDA authorization to manufacture at the same or a different manufacturing site could result in production delays, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flow.

We will be subject to ongoing federal and state regulations, and if we fail to comply, our business could be seriously harmed.

Following initial regulatory approval of any products that we may develop, we will be subject to continuing regulatory review, including review of adverse drug experiences and clinical results that are reported after our products become commercially available. This would include results from any post-marketing tests or continued actions required by a condition of approval. The manufacturing facilities we may use to make any of our products may become subject to periodic review and inspection by the FDA. If a previously unknown problem or problems with a product or a manufacturing and laboratory facility used by us is discovered, the FDA may impose restrictions on that product or on the manufacturing facility, including requiring us to withdraw the product from the market. Any changes to an approved product, including the way it is manufactured or promoted, often requires FDA approval before the product, as modified, can be marketed. In addition, for products we develop in the future, we and our contract manufacturers may be subject to ongoing FDA requirements for submission of safety and other post-market information. If we or any of our contract manufacturers fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, a regulatory agency may:

Additionally, regulatory review covers a company’s activities in the promotion of its drugs, with significant potential penalties and restrictions for promotion of drugs for an unapproved use. Sales and marketing programs, such as illegal promotions to health care professionals, are under scrutiny for compliance with various mandated requirements. We are also required to submit information on open and completed clinical trials to public registries and databases. Failure to comply with these requirements could expose us to negative publicity, fines and penalties that could harm our business.

If we violate regulatory requirements at any stage, whether before or after marketing approval is obtained, we may be fined, be forced to remove a product from the market or experience other adverse consequences, including delay, which would materially harm our financial results. Additionally, we may not be able to obtain the labeling claims necessary or desirable for product promotion.

We and our sales personnel, whether employed by us or by others, must comply with various federal and state anti-kickback, self-referral, false claims and similar laws, any breach of which could cause a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our relationships with physicians, hospitals and the marketers of our products are subject to scrutiny under various federal anti-kickback, self-referral, false claims and similar laws, often referred to collectively as healthcare fraud and abuse laws. Healthcare fraud and abuse laws are complex, and even minor, inadvertent violations can give rise to claims that the relevant law has been violated. Possible sanctions for violation of these fraud and abuse laws include monetary fines, civil and criminal penalties, exclusion from federal and state healthcare programs, including Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Administration health programs, workers’ compensation programs and TRICARE, the healthcare system administered by or on behalf of the U.S. Department of Defense for uniformed services beneficiaries, including active duty and their dependents, retirees and their dependents, and forfeiture of amounts collected in violation of such prohibitions. Certain states have similar fraud and abuse laws, imposing substantial penalties for violations. Any government investigation or a finding of a violation of these laws would likely result in a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock, as well as our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Anti-kickback laws and regulations prohibit any knowing and willful offer, payment, solicitation or receipt of any form of remuneration in return for the referral of an individual or the ordering or recommending of the use of a product or service for which payment may be made by Medicare, Medicaid or other government-sponsored healthcare programs. We may engage additional physicians on a consulting basis. While these agreements with physicians will be structured with the intention of complying with all applicable laws, including the federal ban on physician self-referrals, commonly known as the “Stark Law,” state anti-referral laws and other applicable anti-kickback laws, it is possible that regulatory or enforcement agencies or courts may in the future view these agreements as prohibited arrangements that must be restructured or for which we would be subject to other significant civil or criminal penalties, or prohibit us from accepting referrals from these physicians. Because our strategy includes the involvement of physicians who consult with us on the design of our products, we could be materially impacted if regulatory or enforcement agencies or courts interpret our financial relationships with our physician advisors who refer or order our products to be in violation of applicable laws and determine that we would be unable to achieve compliance with such applicable laws. This could harm our reputation and the reputations of our physician advisors. In addition, the cost of noncompliance with these laws could be substantial since we could be subject to monetary fines and civil or criminal penalties, and we could also be excluded from federally funded healthcare programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, for non-compliance.

The scope and enforcement of all of these laws is uncertain and subject to rapid change, especially in light of the lack of applicable precedent and regulations. There can be no assurance that federal or state regulatory or enforcement authorities will not investigate or challenge our current or future activities under these laws. Any investigation or challenge could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Any state or federal regulatory or enforcement review of us, regardless of the outcome, would be costly and time consuming. Additionally, we cannot predict the impact of any changes in these laws, whether these changes are retroactive or will have effect on a going-forward basis only.

We are dependent on proprietary know-how.

Our manufacturing know-how as to mixing, coating and cross-linking may be able to be duplicated, even if it is difficult to do so. There is no assurance that, should we apply for intellectual property protection for our intellectual property, we would be able to obtain such protection. Therefore, our competitors may develop or market technologies that are more effective or more commercially attractive than ours.

We also rely on trade secret protection to protect our interests in proprietary know-how and for processes for which patents are difficult to obtain or enforce. We may not be able to protect our trade secrets adequately. In addition, we rely on non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements with employees, consultants and other parties to protect, in part, trade secrets and other proprietary technology. These agreements may be breached and we may not have adequate remedies for any breach. Moreover, others may independently develop equivalent proprietary information, and third parties may otherwise gain access to our trade secrets and proprietary knowledge. Any disclosure of confidential data into the public domain or to third parties could allow competitors to learn our trade secrets and use the information in competition against us.

Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, there is no assurance that such protections will preclude our competitors from developing and/or marketing similar products. While we are not aware of any third party intellectual property that would materially affect our business, our failure or inability to obtain patents and protect our proprietary information could result in our business being adversely affected.

If we are not able to establish and maintain successful arrangements with third parties or successfully build our own sales and marketing infrastructure, we may not be able to commercialize our products, which would adversely affect our business and financial condition.

We are currently expanding our sales and marketing capabilities. To commercialize our products, we must continue to develop our own sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, which will be expensive and time consuming, or make arrangements with third parties to perform these services for us. The third parties may not be capable of successfully selling any of our products. We will have to commit significant resources to developing a marketing and sales force and supporting distribution capabilities. If we decide to enter into arrangements with third parties for performance of these services, we may find that they are not available on terms acceptable to us, or at all.

We may face intellectual property infringement claims that could be time-consuming, costly to defend and could result in our loss of significant rights and, in the case of patent infringement claims, the assessment of treble damages.

On occasion, we may receive notices of claims of our infringement, misappropriation or misuse of other parties’ proprietary rights. We may have disputes regarding intellectual property rights with the parties that have licensed those rights to us. We may also initiate claims to defend our intellectual property. Intellectual property litigation, regardless of its outcome, is expensive and time-consuming, could divert management’s attention from our business and have a material negative effect on our business, operating results or financial condition. In addition, the outcome of such litigation may be unpredictable. If there is a successful claim of infringement against us, we may be required to pay substantial damages—including treble damages if we were to be found to have willfully infringed a third party’s patent—to the party claiming infringement, and to develop non-infringing technology, stop selling our products or using technology that contains the allegedly infringing intellectual property or enter into royalty or license agreements that may not be available on acceptable or commercially practical terms, if at all. Our failure to develop non-infringing technologies or license the proprietary rights on a timely basis could harm our business. In addition, modifying our products to exclude infringing technologies could require us to seek re-approval or clearance from various regulatory bodies for our products, which would be costly and time consuming. Also, we may be unaware of pending patent applications that relate to our technology. Parties making infringement claims on future issued patents may be able to obtain an injunction that would prevent us from selling our products or using technology that contains the allegedly infringing intellectual property, which could harm our business.

Our products risk exposure to product liability claims

We are and, if successful in developing, testing and commercializing our products, will increasingly be, exposed to potential product liability risks, which are inherent in the testing, manufacturing and marketing of such products. It is likely we will be contractually obligated, under any distribution agreements that we enter into with respect to products we manufacture, to indemnify the individuals and/or entities that distribute our products against claims relating to the manufacture and sale of products distributed by such distribution partners. This indemnification liability, as well as direct liability to consumers for any defects in the products sold, could expose us to substantial risks and losses. While we have obtained product liability insurance, there can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain such insurance on acceptable terms or that such insurance will provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities. As we begin to sell and distribute our new line of proprietary products, we intend to increase the limits of our product liability insurance. A successful product liability claim or series of claims brought against us could result in judgments, fines, damages and liabilities that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We may incur significant expense investigating and defending these claims, even if they do not result in liability. Moreover, even if no judgments, fines, damages or liabilities are imposed on us, our reputation could suffer, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Healthcare policy changes, including recent laws to reform the U.S. healthcare system, may have a material adverse effect on us.

Healthcare costs have risen significantly over the past decade. There have been, and continue to be, proposals by legislators, regulators, and third-party payors to keep these costs down. Certain proposals, if passed, would impose limitations on the prices we will be able to charge for our products, or the amounts of reimbursement available for our products from governmental agencies or third-party payors. These limitations could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

Various healthcare reform proposals have emerged at the federal and state levels. We cannot predict the exact effect newly enacted laws or any future legislation or regulation will have on us. However, the implementation of new legislation and regulation may lower reimbursements for our products, reduce medical procedure volumes and adversely affect our business, possibly materially. In addition, the enacted excise tax may materially and adversely affect our operating expenses and results of operations.

Decisions in reimbursement levels by governmental or other third-party payors for procedures using our products may have an adverse impact on acceptance of our products.

We believe that our products will be purchased principally by hospitals or physicians, which typically bill various third-party payors, such as governmental programs (e.g., Medicare and Medicaid), private insurance plans and managed care plans, for the healthcare services provided to their patients. The ability of our future customers to obtain appropriate reimbursement for products and services from third-party payors is critical to the success of medical product companies because it affects which products customers purchase and the prices they are willing to pay.  Adverse decisions relating to our products by administrators of these systems in coverage or reimbursement issues, would have an adverse impact on the acceptance of our products and the prices which our customers are willing to pay for them.

Third-party payors have adopted, and are continuing to adopt, a number of healthcare policies intended to curb rising healthcare costs. These policies include:

We are unable to predict whether federal, state or local healthcare reform legislation or regulation affecting our business may be proposed or enacted in the future, or what effect any such legislation or regulation would have on our business. Changes in healthcare systems in the U.S. in a manner that significantly reduces reimbursement for procedures using our products or denies coverage for these procedures would also have an adverse impact on the acceptance of our products and the prices which our customers are willing to pay for them.

It may be difficult to replace some of our suppliers.

In general, raw materials essential to our businesses are readily available from multiple sources. However, for reasons of quality assurance, availability, or cost effectiveness, certain components and raw materials are available only from a sole supplier. The Dow Chemical Company and the BASF Corporation are the principal manufacturers of the two polymers, polyethylene oxide and polyvinylpyrrolidone, respectively, that we primarily use in the manufacture of hydrogels. Carolina Silver is the principal manufacturer utilized in production of our TheraBond dressings. Carolina Silver utilizes a proprietary and patented manufacturing process.

We believe that, due to the size and scale of production of our suppliers, there should be adequate supply of these raw materials from these manufacturers. In addition, our policy is to maintain sufficient inventory of components so that our production will not be significantly disrupted even if a particular component or material is not available for a period of time. However, there is no guarantee that our inventory will be sufficient to carry us through any disruption in supply. Because we have no direct control over our third-party suppliers, interruptions or delays in the products and services provided by these third parties may be difficult to remedy in a timely fashion. In addition, if such suppliers are unable or unwilling to deliver the necessary raw materials or products, we may be unable to redesign or adapt our technology to work without such raw materials or products or find alternative suppliers or manufacturers. In such events, we could experience interruptions, delays, increased costs or quality control problems.

Under our distribution agreement with Sorbion and our supply agreements with CCT, we receive finished goods from these parties. Because we have no direct control over these suppliers, interruptions or delays in the products and services provided by these parties may be difficult to remedy in a timely fashion. In addition, if such suppliers are unable or unwilling to deliver the necessary products, we would be unable to sell these products, and, therefore, could experience a significant adverse impact on our revenue.

We are subject to state regulation with respect to electron beam radiation services and facilities.

We are also subject to state regulation with respect to electron beam radiation services and facilities. The expansion of our business into the manufacturing and distribution of our products for consumer use will subject us to additional governmental regulation.

Risks Related to the Common Stock

Our stock price may be volatile, which could result in substantial losses for investors.

The market price of our common stock is likely to be highly volatile and could fluctuate widely in response to various factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the following:

In addition, the securities markets have from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may also significantly affect the market price of our common stock.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common stock will depend in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. Although we currently have research coverage by securities and industry analysts, you should not invest in our common stock in anticipation that we will increase such coverage. If one or more of the analysts who covers us at any given time downgrades our stock or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, our stock price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of us or fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our stock could decrease, which could cause our stock price and trading volume to decline.

Our board of directors can authorize the issuance of preferred stock, which could diminish the rights of holders of our common stock, and make a change of control of us more difficult even if it might benefit our shareholders.

Our board of directors is authorized to issue shares of preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the voting powers, preferences and other rights and limitations of the preferred stock. Accordingly, we may issue shares of preferred stock with a preference over our common stock with respect to dividends or distributions on liquidation or dissolution, or that may otherwise adversely affect the voting or other rights of the holders of common stock. Issuances of preferred stock, depending upon the rights, preferences and designations of the preferred stock, may have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change of control, even if that change of control might benefit our shareholders.

Offers or availability for sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may cause the price of our common stock to decline.

Sales of a significant number of shares of our common stock in the public market could harm the market price of our common stock and make it more difficult for us to raise funds through future offerings of common stock. As additional shares of our common stock become available for resale in the public market, the supply of our common stock will increase, which could decrease the price of our common stock.

In addition, if our shareholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, upon the expiration of any statutory holding period under Rule 144, upon the expiration of lock-up periods applicable to outstanding shares, or upon the exercise of outstanding options or warrants, it could create a circumstance commonly referred to as an “overhang,” in anticipation of which the market price of our common stock could fall. The existence of an overhang, whether or not sales have occurred or are occurring, could also make it more difficult for us to raise additional financing through the sale of equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem reasonable or appropriate.

There are inherent limitations in all control systems, and misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

The ongoing internal control provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 require us to identify material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting, which is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. Our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, does not expect that our internal controls and disclosure controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. In addition, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefit of controls must be relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, in our company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple errors or mistakes. Further, controls can be circumvented by individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more persons, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, a control may be inadequate because of changes in conditions, such as growth of the company or increased transaction volume, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

In addition, discovery and disclosure of a material weakness, by definition, could have a material adverse impact on our financial statements. Such an occurrence could discourage certain customers or suppliers from doing business with us, cause downgrades in our future debt ratings leading to higher borrowing costs and affect how our stock trades. This could in turn negatively affect our ability to access public debt or equity markets for capital.

We do not expect to pay dividends in the future. As a result, any return on investment may be limited to the value of our common stock.

We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends on our common stock will depend on our earnings, financial condition and other business and economic factors as our board of directors may consider relevant. If we do not pay dividends, our common stock may be less valuable because a return on an investment in our common stock will only occur if our stock price appreciates.

ITEM 1B.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2.  PROPERTIES

Our corporate headquarters are located at 2150 Cabot Boulevard West, Langhorne, Pennsylvania, where we lease approximately 16,500 square feet of office and manufacturing space. We believe that our facility is well maintained and is suitable and adequate for our current needs.

ITEM 3.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we may become involved in lawsuits, investigations and claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. Except as set forth below, as of the date of this filing, we are not party to any material litigation nor are we aware of any such threatened or pending legal proceedings that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results.

On February 27, 2014, ConvaTec Inc. filed suit in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia against us, our subsidiary, Alliqua Biomedical, Inc. and four individual defendants (each a former employee of ConvaTec Inc.), requesting injunctive relief for allegations involving breach of contract, tortious interference with employment agreements, unfair competition and common law conspiracy. The complaint alleged, among other things, that (i) the individual defendants breached certain restrictive covenants in their respective employment agreements with ConvaTec Inc. by engaging in employment with us within one year of their employment termination and using and disclosing confidential and proprietary business information in their employment with us, (ii) we tortuously interfered with such employment agreements by inducing the individual defendants to accept employment with us and to recruit other employees of ConvaTec Inc. to resign and accept employment us and (iii) we solicited, recruited and hired employees of ConvaTec Inc. for the purpose of utilizing their knowledge of confidential and proprietary information related to the wound care industry in order to unfairly compete with ConvaTec Inc. On or about February 9, 2015, the parties executed a confidential settlement agreement terminating the litigation on mutually agreeable terms.

There are no material proceedings in which any of our directors, officers or affiliates or any registered or beneficial shareholder of more than 5% of our common stock is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our interest.

ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5.  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market for Common Stock

Our common stock has been listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “ALQA” since January 28, 2014. Prior to that date, it was quoted on the OTCQB over-the-counter marketplace.

The following table sets forth, for the period of 2014 commencing January 28, 2014, the high and low closing prices of our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Capital Market. The following table also sets forth, for 2013 and the period of 2014 ending on January 27, 2014, the high and low bid prices of our common stock as reported on the OTCQB. The quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail markup, markdown, or commissions, and may not represent actual transactions. All 2013 quotations are adjusted for the 1-for-43.75 reverse stock split of our common stock that occurred November 18, 2013.

Holders of Record

As of February 17, 2015, there were approximately 174 holders of record of our common stock.

Dividends

We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future, but intend to retain our capital resources for reinvestment in our business.

Repurchases of Equity Securities

(1) Comprised of shares of our common stock surrendered by David Johnson in connection with the vesting of restricted stock on October 1, 2014.

(2) For purposes of determining the number of shares to be surrendered to meet tax withholding obligations, the price per share deemed to be paid was the closing price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Capital Market on the applicable vesting date.

ITEM 6.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not applicable.

ITEM 7.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this report. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements based on our current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those indicated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, as more fully discussed in Item 1 of this report, entitled “Business,” under “Forward-Looking Statements” and Item 1A of this report, entitled “Risk Factors.”

Overview

We are a provider of advanced wound care solutions. Through our hydrogel technology platform and licensed and proprietary products, we seek to create superior outcomes for patients, providers, and partners. Our core businesses include advanced wound care and contract manufacturing. We leverage our proprietary hydrogel and licensed technology to add value to our own products and those of our partners.

On May 5, 2014, we acquired Choice Therapeutics, Inc. a provider of innovative wound care products using proprietary Therabond 3D Antimicrobial Barrier Systems, for aggregate consideration of approximately $2,000,000 in cash and 273,368 shares of our common stock. In addition, the acquisition agreement provides for contingent consideration of up to $5,000,000 payable in shares of common stock or cash, to be earned based upon revenues from the sale of certain Choice Therapeutics, Inc. products over the next three twelve month periods ending April 30, 2017.

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2013

Overview. For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, we had a net loss of $25,445,435 and $21,976,882, respectively, which was inclusive of non-cash items, including the impairment charge of $8,100,000 of our in-process research and development recognized in the year ended December 31, 2013.  Additionally, we recognized $10,730,046 and $5,513,861 of stock-based compensation in the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Revenues, net. For the year ended December 31, 2014 revenues increased by $2,988,386, or 166%, to $4,786,131 from $1,797,745 for the year ended December 31, 2013.   The increase in our overall revenue was primarily due to increase in product sales. The components of revenue were as follows for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:

Our growth rates for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

*Represents growth from contract manufacturing and sales of our hydrogel, sorbion, and Biovance products.

**Represents growth from the sale of products acquired in the purchase of Choice Therapeutics in May 2014.

Gross profit (loss). Our gross profit was $1,515,176 for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to a gross loss of $249,288 for the year ended December 31, 2013. The improved results for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to 2013 was primarily due to the greater volume of product sales as product revenue typically commands higher gross profit margins. Gross margin on our product sales was approximately 70%, while our overall gross margin was approximately 32% for the year ended December 31, 2014. We expect our future gross profit to continue to increase as a result of products sales becoming a higher proportion of our total sales.

The components of cost of revenues are as follows for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013: 

Selling, general and administrative expenses. The following table highlights selling, general and administrative expenses by type for the years ended December 31, 2014 versus 2013:

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $14,435,010, to $26,155,008 for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to $11,719,998 for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Stock-based compensation increased by $5,016,404, to $10,530,265 for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to $5,513,861 for the year ended December 31, 2013.  Compensation and benefits increased by $4,104,003, to $7,173,212 for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to $3,069,209 for the year ended December 31, 2013.  The increase in stock-based compensation and compensation and benefits was primarily due to the increase in the number of full-time employees from 22 at December 31, 2013 to 47 at December 31, 2014. This increase is largely due to the hiring of a direct salesforce as well as additional marketing personnel. We expect our stock-based compensation expense to decrease in future years due to the decrease in equity awards to consultants.

Marketing expenses increased by $1,308,156 to $1,607,016 for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to $298,860 for the year ended December 31, 2013. The increase was primarily due to increased efforts to market our proprietary and licensed products through tradeshows, sample products, and market research. Also included in the year ended December 31, 2014 are marketing expenses associated with the launch of our Biovance product and products acquired in the acquisition of Choice Therapeutics.

Royalty expenses increased by $316,893 to $516,893 for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to $200,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013. The increase was primarily due to the scheduled increase in minimum royalties for the exclusive right and license to manufacture and distribute SilverSeal products. The minimum royalty due for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $400,000 compared to $200,000 due for the year ended December 31, 2013. Also included in royalty expense for the year ended December 31, 2014 is approximately $67,000 of royalties due in connection with sales of our Biovance product and $50,000 due to Carolon in connection with sales of our sorbion products.

Other selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $3,689,554, to $6,327,622 for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to $2,638,068 for the year ended December 31, 2013. Other selling, general and administrative expenses consist of costs associated with our selling efforts and general management, including consulting, recruiting, information technology, travel and professional fees such as legal and accounting expenses. These costs were largely driven by the recruitment of our direct sales force and other corporate employees to support our anticipated growth, as well an increase in business development and selling, general and administrative expenses for our newly acquired subsidiary, Choice Therapeutics.

Acquisition-related expenses. During the year ended December 31, 2014, we incurred acquisition-related costs of $546,970 in connection with due diligence, professional fees, and other expenses related to the acquisition of Choice Therapeutics. Additionally, we increased the fair value of our acquisition-related contingent consideration liability by $231,598. The increase is due to the increase in the expected present value of the contingent liability due to less time to expected payout.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Year Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2013

As of December 31, 2014, we had cash and cash equivalents totaling $16,770,879 compared to $12,100,544 at December 31, 2013.  The increase was largely attributable to net proceeds from the issuance of common stock of $14,372,503, proceeds from the exercise of stock options and warrants totaling $6,597,501 offset primarily by cash used in operating activities of $13,291,459 and $2,339,455 used in investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2014.

Net cash flow used in operating activities was $13,291,459 and $4,769,039 for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in net loss excluding stock compensation and other non-cash items of $13,429,890 for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to $5,768,827 for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Net cash used in investing activities was $2,339,455 for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to $118,067 in the year ended December 31, 2013. Cash used in investing activities included our acquisition of Choice Therapeutics for approximately $2.0 million, net of cash acquired. Also contributing to the increase were cash payments related to the purchase of distributions rights for Sorbion products of $333,333.

Net cash flow generated from financing activities was $20,301,249 for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to $16,727,293 for the year ended December 31, 2013. During the year ended December 31, 2014, we received proceeds from stock option and warrant exercises of $6,597,501 and $14,372,503 of proceeds from the issuance of common stock. This was offset by the payment of withholding taxes related to stock-based compensation of $668,755.

At December 31, 2014, current assets totaled $19,629,067 and current liabilities totaled $4,129,824, as compared to current assets totaling $12,847,234 and current liabilities totaling $3,353,464 at December 31, 2013. As a result, we had working capital of $15,499,243 at December 31, 2014 compared to working capital of $9,493,770 at December 31, 2013.

Our cash requirements have historically been for product development, marketing and sales activities, finance and administrative costs, capital expenditures and overall working capital. We have experienced negative operating cash flows since inception and have funded our operations primarily from sales of common stock and other securities.

Liquidity Outlook

We have revamped our strategy to focus on being a provider of wound care solutions as well as continuing to be a contract manufacturer. The use of proceeds from our financings will largely be used to support the sales and marketing of our wound care solutions and potential acquisitions. In 2013, we restructured our senior management team with the goal of maximizing the potential for success in achieving our sales and marketing goals. We have hired new executive officers, various senior sales and marketing executives, and a direct sales force to sell our wound care products. We expect to continue to attend trade shows and seek other avenues to market our products. We continue to focus our efforts on expanding our product offerings. We are seeking complementary products to our current portfolio, in an effort to expand our offerings.

The implementation of our growth strategy will continue to result in an increase in our fixed cost structure. Due to the time delay between outlays for working capital expenditures, such as costs to acquire rights to additional products, merger and acquisition activity, the hiring and training of sales agents and personnel, pre-launch marketing costs, the purchasing of inventory, and the billing and collection of revenue, we expect negative operating cash flows to continue.

We believe that our cash on hand will be sufficient to fund our current business for at least the next 12 months. However, our future results of operations involve significant risks and uncertainties. Factors that could affect our future operating results and cause actual results to vary materially from expectations include, but are not limited to, potential demand for our products, unfavorable decisions on product reimbursement, risks from competition, regulatory approval of our new products, technological change, and dependence on key personnel.

On February 2, 2015 we entered in the Merger Agreement with Celleration. The Merger Agreement provides for an initial aggregate purchase price of $30,415,000 payable in equal amounts of cash and our common stock. In connection with the Merger Agreement, we also received a commitment letter from a lender in which the lender has committed to provide us with a senior, secured term loan facility in the amount of $15,500,000, pursuant to the terms of the commitment letter. We expect to use the proceeds from this loan facility to provide the capital for the upfront cash portion associated with the consummation of the Merger Agreement. The Merger Agreement may be terminated by either party if the Merger is not completed by May 31, 2015, provided that we may extend that date to July 31, 2015 in certain circumstances so long as we provide Celleration with a $1,000,000 loan by May 15, 2015.

In order to complete our future growth strategy, including the expansion of our product offering, we will require additional equity and/or debt financing. On August 5, 2014, we filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). The registration statement was declared effective by the SEC on September 25, 2014. This registration statement will enable us to offer and sell to the public from time to time in one or more offerings, up to $100,000,000 of common and preferred stock, debt securities, warrants, units or any combination thereof. The terms of any securities offered under the registration statement, and the intended use of the net proceeds resulting therefrom, will be established at the times of the offerings and will be described in prospectus supplements filed with the SEC at the times of the offerings. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in securing additional capital in sufficient amounts and on terms favorable to us.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2014, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements in the nature of guarantee contracts, retained or contingent interests in assets transferred to unconsolidated entities (or similar arrangements serving as credit, liquidity or market risk support to unconsolidated entities for any such assets), or obligations (including contingent obligations) arising out of variable interests in unconsolidated entities providing financing, liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to us, or that engage in leasing, hedging or research and development services with us. 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires that we make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The accounting policies that we believe require more significant estimates and assumptions include: the valuation of goodwill, intangible assets and acquisition-related contingent consideration liabilities, allowances for doubtful accounts, and reserves for inventory obsolescence. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Our actual results may differ significantly from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. There have been no material changes to these estimates for the periods presented in this Annual Report.

We believe that of our significant accounting policies, which are described below and in Note 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this Item 7 of this Annual Report, the following accounting policies involve a greater degree of judgment and complexity. Accordingly, these are the policies we believe are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our financial condition and results of operations. 

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess purchase price of acquired businesses over the fair values attributed to underlying net tangible assets and identifiable intangible assets. We assess the recoverability of goodwill annually, at the beginning of the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would indicate the carrying amount may be impaired. Impairment testing for goodwill is done at a reporting unit level. Under Financial Accounting Standards Board “FASB” guidance for goodwill and other intangible assets, a reporting unit is defined as an operating segment or one level below the operating segment, called a component. However, two or more components of an operating segment will be aggregated and deemed a single reporting unit if the components have similar economic characteristics. In 2013, we adopted authoritative accounting guidance that allows us to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the more detailed two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. We perform the quantitative test if the qualitative assessment determined it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount. We may elect to bypass the qualitative assessment and proceed directly to the quantitative test for any reporting unit. When performing the quantitative test, an impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s net assets exceeds the estimated fair value of the reporting unit and the carrying amount of reporting unit goodwill is determined to exceed the implied fair value of that goodwill. The estimated fair value of a reporting unit is calculated using a discounted cash flow model. There were no goodwill impairment charges recorded during the years ended December 31, 2014 or 2013.

Acquired In-Process Research and Development

In-process research and development (“IPR&D”) represents the fair value assigned to incomplete research projects that we acquire through business combinations which, at the time of acquisition, have not reached technological feasibility. Amounts capitalized as IPR&D are accounted for as indefinite-lived intangible assets, subject to impairment testing until completion or abandonment of the projects. Once an IPR&D project has been completed, the useful life of the IPR&D asset is determined and amortized accordingly. If the IPR&D asset is abandoned, the remaining carrying value will be written off. During the year ended December 31, 2013, we recognized impairment of our HepaMate™ patented biotech technologies IPR&D of $8,100,000 as we believed there were impairment triggering events and circumstances which warranted an evaluation of certain indefinite-lived intangible assets.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets Subject to Amortization

We amortize intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful lives and review them for impairment at least annually or whenever an impairment indicator exists. We continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of our long-lived assets, including our intangible assets, may not be recoverable. When such events or changes in circumstances occur, we assess recoverability by determining whether the carrying value of such assets will be recovered through the undiscounted expected future cash flows. If the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of these assets, we recognize an impairment loss based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the assets. There were no long-lived asset impairment charges recorded during the years ended December 31, 2014 or 2013.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued a new revenue recognition standard entitled “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” under Accounting Standards Update 2014-09.  The core principle of the new guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. New disclosures about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers are also required. The standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, which for the Company will commence with the year beginning January 1, 2017.  Earlier application is not permitted.  Entities must adopt the new guidance using one of two retrospective application methods. The Company is currently evaluating the standard to determine the impact of its adoption on the consolidated financial statements.

In June 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-12, “Compensation — Stock Compensation: Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period".  The standard requires that a performance target that affects vesting of share-based payments and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition that affects vesting and as such, should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award.  The standard is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015.  This standard is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows

ITEM 7A.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLMENTARY DATA

Our Consolidated Financial Statements and the relevant notes to those statements are attached to this report beginning on page F-1.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (“Disclosure Controls”), as defined by Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as of December 31, 2014, the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Disclosure Controls evaluation was done under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that our Disclosure Controls were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2014.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the consolidated financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate over time.

Management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992). Based on its assessment and those criteria, management has concluded that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The following table sets forth information regarding our executive officers and the members of our board of directors. All directors hold office for one-year terms until the election and qualification of their successors. Officers are elected by the board of directors and serve at the discretion of the board.

In accordance with a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Celgene Agreement”) dated November 14, 2013 by and between us and Celgene Corporation (“Celgene”), our board of directors was required to increase its size by one director and elect to such newly created vacancy a non-competitive individual designated by Celgene (the “Celgene Designee”). Celgene proposed to the Company that Mr. Perry A. Karsen be appointed to fill this position and on November 27, 2013, the board increased its size to nine directors and appointed Mr. Karsen as a director. For so long as Celgene or any of its affiliates hold at least 50% of the 1,672,474 shares of our common stock purchased pursuant to the Celgene Agreement, our board of directors is required to use its reasonable best efforts to remove, upon direction from Celgene, any Celgene Designee, and appoint each successor Celgene Designee that Celgene designates.

The following sets forth biographical information and the qualifications and skills for each director nominee:

David Johnson was appointed to our board and as Executive Chairman of Aquamed Technologies, Inc. on November 29, 2012. He was appointed our President and Chief Executive officer on February 4, 2013. Mr. Johnson was formerly President of the ConvaTec Division of Bristol-Myers Squibb, Inc. until 2008 when he orchestrated a sale of the division from its pharmaceutical parent to Avista Capital Partners and Nordic Capital in a deal valued at $4.1 billion. Concurrently, he acquired and integrated the assets of Copenhagen-based Unomedical to expand ConvaTec Inc.’s manufacturing and infrastructure into Europe. From 2008 through 2012, Mr. Johnson served as the Chief Executive Officer of ConvaTec Inc. Prior to his tenure with ConvaTec Inc., Mr. Johnson held several senior positions in the U.S., Europe and Canada with Zimmer Inc., Fisher Scientific, and Baxter Corporation. He served as a member of ConvaTec Inc.’s board of directors and the board of the Advanced Medical Technology Association (AdvaMed), where he chaired the Global Wound Sector Team for four years. Mr. Johnson received an Undergraduate Business Degree in Marketing from the Northern Alberta Institute of Technology in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, completed the INSEAD Advanced Management Program in Fontainbleau, France, and is a fellow from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. We believe that Mr. Johnson’s extensive experience in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology fields, as well as his executive leadership experience, make him an asset that will serve as a bridge between our board of directors and our executive officers.

Brian Posner was appointed to serve as our Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary on September 3, 2013. Mr. Posner has more than 25 years of diversified management experience, at both public and private companies. Most recently, he served as Chief Financial Officer of Ocean Power Technologies, Inc., a publicly-traded renewable energy company specializing in wave power technology, from June 2010 to August 2013. Prior to that, he served as Chief Financial Officer of Power Medical Interventions, Inc., a publicly-traded medical device company, from January 2009 until its sale to Covidien Plc in September 2009. From June 1999 to December 2008, Mr. Posner served in a series of positions of increasing responsibility with Pharmacopeia, Inc., a clinical development stage biopharmaceutical company, culminating in his service as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from May 2006 to December 2008. Mr. Posner also worked at Phytomedics, Inc., and as Regional Chief Financial Officer of Omnicare, Inc. Mr. Posner earned an MBA in Managerial Accounting from Pace University’s Lubin School of Business and a BA in Accounting from Queens College.

Bradford Barton has served as our Chief Operating Officer since August 29, 2014. Prior to that, he served as the Chief Operating Officer of our proprietary products division since May 2013. Mr. Barton was formerly President of the Americas division at ConvaTec Inc., where he led the company’s core businesses in ostomy care, wound therapeutics and continence and critical care in the U.S., Canada and Latin America, from November 2010 until February 2013. Mr. Barton joined ConvaTec Inc. in 1996 and has held several senior management positions across the company’s business divisions and regions, including Vice President of the Americas division, with responsibility for the wound therapeutics business in the U.S., Canada and Puerto Rico, Vice President of the Intercontinental division as well as Vice President and General Manager of the ostomy care business in the U.S. Prior to his tenure at ConvaTec Inc., Mr. Barton also held a number of sales leadership positions at Calgon Corporation and Calgon Vestal Laboratories, Inc., which was acquired by the Steris Corporation in 1996.

Jerome Zeldis, M.D., Ph.D. has served as a member of our board of directors since May 17, 2012 and was appointed Chairman on November 27, 2012. Dr. Zeldis is the Chief Executive Officer of Celgene Global Health and the Chief Medical Officer of Celgene Corporation. Dr. Zeldis has been with Celgene since 1997; prior to his current role, he served as Senior Vice President of Clinical Research and Medical Affairs. Prior to Celgene, Dr. Zeldis worked at Sandoz Research Institute and Janssen Research Institute in both clinical research and medical development. He is currently on the board of the Semorex Corporation, Bionor Pharma, Inc., Mali Health and PTC Corporation. Dr. Zeldis attended Brown University for a B.A., M.S., followed by Yale University for a M.Phil., M.D., and Ph.D. in molecular biophysics and biochemistry (immunochemistry). He trained in internal medicine at the UCLA Center for the Health Sciences and Gastroenterology at the Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School. He was Assistant Professor of Medicine at the Harvard Medical School, Associate Professor of Medicine at University of California, Davis, Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine at Cornell Medical School and Professor of Clinical Medicine at the Robert Wood Johnson Medical School in New Brunswick, New Jersey. Dr. Zeldis has published 122 peer reviewed articles and 24 reviews, book chapters, and editorials. We believe that Dr. Zeldis’s background in the healthcare industry, as well as his experience in emerging growth companies make him a valuable resource on our board of directors.

Andrew Africk has served as a member of our board of directors since July 21, 2014. Mr. Africk formed Searay Capital LLC, a private investment company, in July 2013, after 21 years at Apollo Global Management LLC, a leading Global Alternative Asset Manager, leaving as a Senior Partner. As a Senior Partner at the firm, Mr. Africk was responsible for Apollo's investments in technology and communications. In the past five years, Mr. Africk has also served on the board of directors for Hughes Telematics, Inc., Hughes Communications, Inc. and Parallel Petroleum, Inc. Mr. Africk currently serves on the board of overseers of the University of Pennsylvania School of Engineering, the UCLA Science board, and is a Trustee of the Trinity School in New York City. We believe that Mr. Africk’s significant experience in making and managing private equity investments and extensive experience in financing, analyzing and investing in public and private companies, make him a valuable resource on our board of directors.

Perry Karsen has served as a member of our board of directors since November 27, 2013. Mr. Karsen is currently Chief Executive Officer of Celgene Cellular Therapeutics (CCT), Celgene’s placental stem cell research and development division. Previously, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Operations Officer at Celgene Corporation. Mr. Karsen served as President and Chief Executive Officer at Pearl Therapeutics, a privately-held biotechnology company that was subsequently acquired by Astra-Zeneca, from February 2009 until July 2010. From 2004 to 2009, Mr. Karsen was Senior Vice President and Head of Worldwide Business Development for Celgene and was also responsible for emerging businesses as President, Asia/Pacific Region. Mr. Karsen also held executive roles at Human Genome Sciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech and Abbott Laboratories. In addition, Mr. Karsen was a General Partner at Pequot Ventures. Mr. Karsen is a member of the board of directors of the Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) and a member of the Executive Committee; he is a member of the board of directors for the Life Sciences Foundation, a member of the board of directors of Agios Pharmaceuticals, and a member of the board of directors of Navidea Biopharmaceuticals. Mr. Karsen has a Masters of Management degree from Northwestern University’s Kellogg Graduate School of Management, a Masters in Teaching of Biology from Duke University, and a B.S. in Biological Sciences from the University of Illinois, Urbana. We believe that Mr. Karsen’s extensive experience in the healthcare and biotechnology fields, as well as his executive leadership experience, make him a valuable resource on our board of directors.

Joseph Leone has served as a member of our board of directors since January 3, 2011. Since December 2012, Mr. Leone has served as Director and a Senior Officer of RMH Franchise Holdings, a privately owned company with 139 franchise restaurants in 13 states and revenues approximating $340 million. Mr. Leone spent more than 24 years with CIT Group, one of the nation’s largest small and mid-size business lenders, and held several senior-level positions at CIT, most recently Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer from May 1995 through April 2010. From 1975 through 1983, Mr. Leone was employed by KPMG – Peat Marwick as a Senior Manager for Financial Services Clients including Citibank and MHT. He has been a Certified Public Accountant since 1977. Mr. Leone is a graduate of Baruch College (BBA in Accounting) and the Advanced Management Program at Harvard Business School. We believe that Mr. Leone’s extensive background in accounting and finance makes him a valuable member of our board.

Gary Restani has served as a member of our board of directors since July 21, 2014. Mr. Restani currently serves as Vice Chairman and is a member of the board of directors of Spiracur Inc., a privately held medical device company focused on the development of innovative wound healing technologies. Until April 2014, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Spiracur Inc. Mr. Restani has more than 40 years of experience in the medical device industry. He served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Hansen Medical, Inc. from October 2006 to February 28, 2009. From December 1999 to June 2006, he served as President of ConvaTec, Inc. From March 1995 to November 1999, Mr. Restani served as the President of various international divisions of Zimmer, Inc., a medical device and surgical tool company. From March 1990 to February 1995, Mr. Restani served as President of various international divisions of Smith & Nephew Orthopedics, Inc., an orthopedics, endoscopy and wound management company. He served as Director of Synovis Orthopedic and Woundcare, Inc. (alternate name, Pegasus Biologics, Inc.) from 2007 to 2011. Mr. Restani served as a Director of Corpak Medsystems until 2014, and with DFine Inc. from 2007 to 2012. He served on the board of AdvaMed from 1997 to 2006 as well as the Leadership Board of the Cleveland Clinic's Center for Digestive Diseases from 2000 to 2006. He served as a Director of Hansen Medical, Inc. from September 2006 to June 17, 2009. He attended Sir George Williams University and Loyola University and holds a certificate from Dartmouth College for completing the Tuck School of Business’ General Management Executive Program. We believe that Mr. Restani’s extensive experience in the medical technology sector, as well as his executive leadership experience, make him a valuable resource on our board.

Jeffrey Sklar has served as a member of our board of directors since January 3, 2011. Mr. Sklar has served as the Managing Partner of Sklar, Heyman Hirshfield, & Kantor LLP, a regional accounting firm, where he oversees the industry specialization team for non-bank financial institutions and for forensic and investigative auditing services, since January 2010 and prior to that, from January 2006 to December 2009, he served as an audit partner. Since 2000, Mr. Sklar has also served as the Managing Director of SHC Consulting Group, LLC. Mr. Sklar served Public Savings Bank as a Director, as the Chair of the Compliance and Risk Committee, and as a member of the Audit Committee from September 2010 to September 2011. In addition to being a Certified Public Accountant, Mr. Sklar is a Certified Financial Crime Specialist, Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialist, Certified Fraud Specialist and Certified in Financial Forensics by the American Institute of CPAs. Mr. Sklar’s qualifications to serve on the board include his extensive background in accounting and finance.

The board of directors regards all of the individuals above as competent professionals with many years of experience in the business community. The board of directors believes that the overall experience and knowledge of the members of the board of directors will contribute to the overall success of our business.

The board of directors regards all of the individuals above as competent professionals with many years of experience in the business community. The board of directors believes that the overall experience and knowledge of the members of the board of directors will contribute to the overall success of our business.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among any of the directors or executive officers of the Company.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors and officers, and persons who own more than ten percent of our common stock, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock. Directors, officers and persons who own more than ten percent of our common stock are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

To our knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to us, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, each of our directors, officers and greater than ten percent shareholders complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our directors, officers and greater than ten percent shareholders, except for one late Form 4 filed by James Sapirstein, then our chief executive officer, Therapeutics Division, with respect to one transaction, one late Form 4 filed by Kenneth Londoner, then our director, with respect to one transaction that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2013, one late report on Form 4 filed by Dr. Zeldis with respect to one transaction and one late Form 4 filed Mr. Johnson with respect to one transaction.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a code of corporate governance and ethics that applies to all our directors and employees, including the principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and controller. The full text of our Amended and Restated Code of Corporate Governance and Ethics is published on the Investors section of our website at www.alliqua.com. We intend to disclose any future amendments to certain provisions of the Amended and Restated Code of Corporate Governance and Ethics, or waivers of such provisions granted to executive officers and directors, on this website within four business days following the date of any such amendment or waiver.

Board Committees

Our board of directors has established an audit committee, a nominating and corporate governance committee and a compensation committee, each of which has the composition and responsibilities described below.

Audit Committee. Our audit committee is currently comprised of Messrs. Leone, Sklar and Africk, each of whom our board has determined to be financially literate and qualify as an independent director under Section 5605(a)(2) and Section 5605(c)(2) of the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market. Mr. Leone is the chairman of our audit committee. In addition, each of Messrs. Leone and Sklar qualify as a financial expert, as defined in Item 407(d)(5)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Our nominating and corporate governance committee is currently comprised of Messrs. Leone and Restani and Dr. Zeldis, each of whom qualifies as an independent director under Section 5605(a)(2) of the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market. Dr. Zeldis is the chairman of our nominating and corporate governance committee.

Compensation Committee. Our compensation committee is currently comprised of Messrs. Restani and Sklar and Dr. Zeldis, each of whom qualifies as an independent director under Section 5605(a)(2) of the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, an “outside director” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and a “non-employee director” for purposes of Section 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and does not have a relationship to us which is material to his ability to be independent from management in connection with the duties of a compensation committee member, as described in Section 5605(d)(2) of the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market. Mr. Sklar is the chairman of our compensation committee.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Philosophy and Process

The responsibility for establishing, administering and interpreting our policies governing the compensation and benefits for our executive officers lies with our compensation committee and our board of directors. Our board of directors has not retained the services of any compensation consultants in connection with the compensation of our executive officers.

The goals of our executive compensation program are to attract, motivate and retain individuals with the skills and qualities necessary to support and develop our business within the framework of our size and available resources. In 2014, we designed our executive compensation program to achieve the following objectives:

The compensation committee may delegate its responsibilities and authority to a subcommittee. The Company’s executive officers played no role in determining or recommending the amount or form of executive and director compensation for 2014.

2014 and 2013 Summary Compensation Table

The table below sets forth, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the compensation paid to our named executive officers: (i) David Johnson, our president and chief executive officer and a member of our board; (ii) Brian Posner, who has served as our chief financial officer, treasurer and secretary since September 3, 2013; and (iii) Bradford Barton, who has served as our chief operating officer since August 29, 2014 and prior to that served as the chief operating officer of our proprietary products division since May 2013.

Agreements with Executive Officers

David Johnson

In connection with the appointment of David Johnson as our chief executive officer, on February 4, 2013, we entered into an Executive Employment Agreement with Mr. Johnson. The employment agreement has an initial term of three years and will be automatically renewed for an additional one-year term unless terminated by either party upon written notice provided not less than four months before the end of the initial term. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Johnson is entitled to an annual salary of $350,000, which may be increased, but not decreased, in the board’s discretion. Mr. Johnson is also eligible to receive an annual bonus of up to 100% of his base salary, provided that he is employed with us on December 31 of the year to which the bonus relates. The amount of Mr. Johnson’s annual bonus, if any, will be determined based upon the achievement of certain performance criteria. The performance criteria for each year will be set by our compensation committee after consultation with Mr. Johnson. Mr. Johnson is also entitled to a monthly automobile allowance of $750 per month, reimbursement of up to $200 per month for the cost of a term life insurance policy having a face amount of $1 million, and benefit plans provided by us to all employees and executive employees.

Mr. Johnson is entitled to receive the following equity awards pursuant to our 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan or, if there are not sufficient shares available under the 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan, pursuant to a stand-alone award agreement:

Mr. Johnson is also eligible to receive additional equity awards in such amount and on such terms as is determined by the board. Mr. Johnson received the first award set forth above on February 4, 2013. He was awarded options to purchase 279,227 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.28 per share. Mr. Johnson received stock option grants for the first, second and third calendar quarters of 2013 under the second award set forth above on November 14, 2013. He was awarded an aggregate of 117,125 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.50 per share. The foregoing share numbers and prices have been adjusted for the 1 for 43.75 reverse stock split of our common stock that occurred on November 18, 2013.

On December 20, 2013, we entered into a First Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement with Mr. Johnson, which amended the employment agreement to provide for a single stock option award in lieu of all of the remaining quarterly grants thereunder. Pursuant to the amendment, Mr. Johnson received a nonqualified stock option to purchase 730,535 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price equal to $6.82 per share on December 20, 2013. The option has a term of ten years, with one-ninth of the optioned shares vesting on the first day of each calendar quarter during the period commencing on January 1, 2014 and ending on February 4, 2016, provided that Mr. Johnson remains employed by the Company on such date, and subject to the terms and conditions of that certain nonqualified stock option agreement by and between the Company and Mr. Johnson, effective as of December 20, 2013.

The employment agreement also contains certain confidentiality, non-solicitation and non-disparagement requirements for Mr. Johnson.

The Company has the right to terminate the employment agreement at any time for cause. “Cause” is defined as Mr. Johnson’s commission of any of the following: an act of theft, embezzlement or fraud; an act of intentional dishonesty or willful misrepresentation of a material nature; any willful misconduct with regard to us; a material breach of any fiduciary duties owed to us; conviction of, or pleading nolo contendere or guilty to, a felony or misdemeanor (other than a traffic infraction) that is reasonably likely to cause damage to us or our reputation; a material violation of our written policies, standards or guidelines that is not cured within 30 days; refusal to perform the material duties and responsibilities required by the employment agreement, subject to a 30 day cure period; and a material breach of the employment agreement or any other agreement to which Mr. Johnson and we are parties that is not cured within 30 days. The employment agreement may also be terminated by either party at any time without cause upon 30 days written notice, and by Mr. Johnson with good reason upon 90 days written notice, which shall include a 30 day cure period. “Good Reason” is defined as the occurrence, without Mr. Johnson’s prior written consent, of a material reduction in base salary, a material diminution in title, duties, responsibility or authority, relocation of his primary office to an office located 35 miles from the office in Langhorne, Pennsylvania, a material breach by us of any agreement with Mr. Johnson or failure by us to have any successor assume the employment agreement.

If Mr. Johnson is terminated by reason of death or disability, we will pay to him or his estate or a pro rata portion of any earned, but unpaid, bonus for services rendered during the year preceding the date of termination. If Mr. Johnson’s employment is terminated by us without cause or by him with good reason, subject to compliance with the confidentiality, non-solicitation and non-disparagement requirements of the employment agreement and the execution of a release of claims, (i) we will pay him an amount equal to the sum of 24 months base salary; (ii) either his pro rata bonus for the year if termination of employment is in the first two years of the term, or two years of bonus calculated at the target bonus level (payable over 24 months) if termination is after the first two years of the term ; (iii) all outstanding stock options and other equity awards granted to Mr. Johnson will vest, to the extent not previously vested, and the stock options will remain exercisable for three months; and (iv) we will provide continued healthcare coverage until the earlier of (x) the expiration of the severance period, or (y) the date that Mr. Johnson’s “COBRA” coverage terminates or expires or (z) the date that Mr. Johnson obtains new employment that offers substantially similar health benefits.

On January 6, 2014, Mr. Johnson received a restricted stock award grant of 369,395 shares of common stock pursuant to our 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The restricted shares vest in eight equal quarterly installments, with one-eighth vesting on January 6, 2014 and the first day of each calendar quarter thereafter, provided that Mr. Johnson remains employed by us on the applicable vesting date, and subject to the terms and conditions of that certain restricted stock award agreement by and between us and Mr. Johnson, effective as of January 6, 2014.

On February 6, 2015, Mr. Johnson received a restricted stock award grant of 300,000 shares of common stock pursuant to our 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The restricted shares vest in three equal annual installments, with one-third vesting on each of February 6, 2016, February 6, 2017 and February 6, 2018, provided that Mr. Johnson remains employed by us on the applicable vesting date, and subject to the terms and conditions of that certain restricted stock award agreement by and between us and Mr. Johnson, effective as of February 6, 2015. On the same date, Mr. Johnson also received an option to purchase 115,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $6.23 per share pursuant to the 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan, with one-third vesting and becoming exercisable on each of February 6, 2016, February 6, 2017 and February 6, 2018. The option has a term of ten years.

The 2015 performance criteria for Mr. Johnson are based on the Company’s achievement of certain financial and operational goals.

Brian Posner

In connection with his appointment as our chief financial officer, pursuant to an offer letter dated July 19, 2013, the Company has agreed to pay Mr. Posner an annual salary of $240,000, an annual bonus of up to 60% of his prorated annual base salary based on the achievement of mutually agreed upon objectives (either in equity or cash, to be determined), a monthly stipend of $700 to cover auto expenses, and medical, dental, 401(k), group life and long-term disability benefits. On September 3, 2013, the Company also granted Mr. Posner nonqualified stock options to purchase 185,142 shares of common stock as follows: (i) 61,714 shares at an exercise price of $4.38 per share, which vested immediately; (ii) 61,714 shares at an exercise price of $6.56 per share, which will vest upon the one year anniversary of employment; and (iii) 61,714 shares at an exercise price of $8.75 per share, which will vest upon the two year anniversary of employment. The options have a term of ten years. The foregoing amounts and prices have been adjusted to give effect to the 1 for 43.75 reverse stock split that occurred on November 18, 2013.

On March 6, 2014, Mr. Posner received an option to purchase 70,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $9.00 per share pursuant to the 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan, with one-third vesting and becoming exercisable on each of March 6, 2015, March 6, 2016 and March 6, 2017. The option has a term of ten years.

On February 6, 2015, Mr. Posner received a restricted stock award grant of 100,000 shares of common stock pursuant to our 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The restricted shares vest in three equal annual installments, with one-third vesting on each of February 6, 2016, February 6, 2017 and February 6, 2018, provided that Mr. Posner remains employed by us on the applicable vesting date, and subject to the terms and conditions of that certain restricted stock award agreement by and between us and Mr. Posner, effective as of February 6, 2015. On the same date, Mr. Posner also received an option to purchase 115,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $6.23 per share pursuant to the 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan, with one-third vesting and becoming exercisable on each of February 6, 2016, February 6, 2017 and February 6, 2018. The option has a term of ten years.

The 2015 performance criteria for Mr. Posner are the same as those described above for Mr. Johnson.

Bradford Barton

In connection with his appointment as our chief operating officer, pursuant to an offer letter dated May 14, 2013, the Company has agreed to pay Mr. Barton an annual salary of $240,000, an annual bonus of up to 60% of his prorated annual base salary based on the achievement of mutually agreed upon objectives, a monthly stipend of $700 to cover auto and telephone expenses, and medical, dental, 401(k), group life and long-term disability benefits.

On February 6, 2015, Mr. Barton received a restricted stock award grant of 100,000 shares of common stock pursuant to our 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan. The restricted shares vest in three equal annual installments, with one-third vesting on each of February 6, 2016, February 6, 2017 and February 6, 2018, provided that Mr. Barton remains employed by us on the applicable vesting date, and subject to the terms and conditions of that certain restricted stock award agreement by and between us and Mr. Barton, effective as of February 6, 2015. On the same date, Mr. Barton also received an option to purchase 115,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $6.23 per share pursuant to the 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan, with one-third vesting and becoming exercisable on each of February 6, 2016, February 6, 2017 and February 6, 2018. The option has a term of ten years.

The 2015 performance criteria for Mr. Barton are the same as those described above for Mr. Johnson.

During the portion of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 prior to becoming our chief operating officer, Mr. Barton was paid as outlined above. On March 6, 2014, Mr. Barton received an option to purchase 70,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $9.00 per share pursuant to the 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan, with one-third vesting and becoming exercisable on each of March 6, 2015, March 6, 2016 and March 6, 2017. The option has a term of ten years.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

The following table sets forth information regarding equity awards that have been previously awarded to each of the named executive officers and which remained outstanding as of December 31, 2014.

Change of Control Agreements

We do not currently have any plans providing for the payment of retirement benefits to our officers or directors, other than as described under “Agreements with Executive Officers” above.

We do not currently have any change-of-control or severance agreements with any of our executive officers or directors, other than as described under “Agreements with Executive Officers” above. In the event of the termination of employment of the named executive officers, any and all unexercised stock options shall expire and no longer be exercisable after a specified time following the date of the termination, other than as described under “Agreements with Executive Officers” above.

2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan

Our board of directors adopted the 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan on November 7, 2011, which was approved by our shareholders at our 2011 annual meeting held on December 19, 2011. The purpose of our 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan is to enable us to remain competitive and innovative in our ability to attract, motivate, reward and retain the services of key employees, certain key contractors, and non-employee directors. Our 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan provides for the granting of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance awards, dividend equivalent rights, and other awards which may be granted singly, in combination, or in tandem, and which may be paid in cash or shares of common stock. Our 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan is expected to provide flexibility to our compensation methods in order to adapt the compensation of employees, contractors, and non-employee directors to a changing business environment, after giving due consideration to competitive conditions and the impact of federal tax laws. Our 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan is administered by our board of directors. A total of 1,828,572 shares of common stock are reserved for award under the 2011 Plan, of which 15,179 were available for future issuance as of December 31, 2014.

2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan

Our board of directors approved the 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan on April 10, 2014, which was approved by our stockholders at our annual meeting held on June 5, 2014 and adopted on that date. The purpose of the 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan is to enable us to remain competitive and innovative in our ability to attract, motivate, reward and retain the services of key employees, certain key contractors, and non-employee directors. The 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan provides for the granting of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance awards, dividend equivalent rights, and other awards which may be granted singly, in combination, or in tandem, and which may be paid in cash or shares of common stock. The 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan is expected to provide flexibility to our compensation methods in order to adapt the compensation of employees, contractors, and non-employee directors to a changing business environment, after giving due consideration to competitive conditions and the impact of federal tax laws. The 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan is administered by our board of directors. A total of 2,000,000 shares of common stock are reserved for award under the 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan, of which 1,742,000 were available for future issuance as of December 31, 2014.

Director Compensation

The following table shows information concerning our directors, other than David Johnson, during the year ended December 31, 2014.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, cash compensation for non-employee directors, including the board chair, was $30,000. In addition, the audit committee chair was paid $12,000, the compensation committee chair was paid $10,000, other audit committee members were paid $6,000, other compensation committee members were paid $4,500 and nominating and corporate governance committee members, including the chair, were paid $3,000. Each non-employee director also received stock options to purchase 5,000 shares of our common stock. The exercise price of the grant was $9.00. These stock options will vest monthly over a 12 month period from the date of grant and have a ten-year term.

For the year ending December 31, 2015, cash compensation will remain the same as 2014. Each non-employee director will also receive stock options to purchase 5,000 shares of our common stock at the beginning of their term. The exercise price of the grant is the closing price of our common stock at the date of the grant. These stock options will vest monthly over a 12 month period from the date of grant and have a ten-year term.

Mr. Karsen has waived his cash compensation and stock option grant for the year ending December 31, 2015.

For the year ending December 31, 2014, we engaged Frederic W. Cooke & Co., Inc., to prepare a competitive review of our non-employee director compensation program and make appropriate recommendations. The hiring of this consultant was requested by our compensation committee. The consultant was formally engaged by our chief financial officer, after consultation with the compensation committee.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides certain information as of December 31, 2014 with respect to our equity compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance:

(1) Comprised of the following awards:

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of February 23, 2015 by:

The percentages of common stock beneficially owned are reported on the basis of regulations of the SEC governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under the rules of the SEC, a person is deemed to be a beneficial owner of a security if that person has or shares voting power, which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of the security, or investment power, which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of the security. Except as indicated in the footnotes to this table, each beneficial owner named in the table below has sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all shares beneficially owned and each person’s address is c/o Alliqua BioMedical, Inc., 2150 Cabot Blvd. West, Langhorne, PA 19047. As of February 17, 2015, we had 16,825,095 shares outstanding.

* Represents ownership of less than 1%

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Certain Related Transactions and Relationships

We effected a 1-for-43.75 reverse stock split of our outstanding common stock on November 18, 2013. Unless otherwise indicated, the share numbers and prices described below have been adjusted to give effect to the reverse stock split.

On March 14, 2014, James Sapirstein resigned as chief executive officer of Alliqua Biomedical, Inc., our wholly-owned subsidiary, effective immediately. In connection with his resignation, we entered into a general release and severance agreement with Mr. Sapirstein, pursuant to which, among other things, (i) that certain executive employment agreement between Mr. Sapirstein and the Company, dated September 28, 2012 was terminated, except with respect to the provisions of the employment agreement relating to confidentiality and restrictive covenants that remain in effect, (ii) Mr. Sapirstein resigned from his positions with the Company, and (iii) we agreed to provide Mr. Sapirstein with the following: (a) a lump sum payment in the amount of $210,000; (b) severance payments, in an amount equal to his base salary for a severance period of six months, commencing on the 60th day following the date of resignation; (c) continued health insurance coverage for the severance period; and (d) the full and immediate vesting of all outstanding stock options and restricted stock unit awards granted to Mr. Sapirstein, with such stock options remaining exercisable for a period of two years following the date of resignation.

On January 6, 2014, we entered into an option cancellation and release agreement with each of Richard Rosenblum, our former president, co-executive chairman and director, and David Stefansky, our former co-executive chairman and current director, pursuant to which the parties agreed to cancel certain options to purchase 278,096 shares of common stock at exercise prices ranging from $6.34 to $9.19 that were previously granted to each of Messrs. Rosenblum and Stefansky, as set forth in the applicable stock option agreements. In exchange for the cancellation of their respective options and option agreements, we granted to each of Messrs. Rosenblum and Stefansky, pursuant to our 2011 Long-Term Incentive Plan, 194,667 full shares of common stock of the Company as of January 6, 2014.

On November 14, 2013, we entered into a license, marketing and development agreement with Anthrogenesis Corporation, d/b/a Celgene Cellular Therapeutics (“CCT”), pursuant to which CCT granted the Company an exclusive, royalty-bearing license in its intellectual property of certain placental based products, including ECMs, an extracellular matrix derived from the human placenta, and Biovance, CCT’s proprietary wound coverings produced from decellularized, dehydrated human amniotic membrane, to develop and commercialize ECMs and Biovance in the United States. Following the commencement of commercial sales of the licensed products under the agreement, the Company will pay CCT annual license fees, designated amounts when certain milestone events occur and royalties on all sales of licensed products, with such amounts being variable and contingent on various factors. In addition, on November 14, 2013, we entered into a supply agreement, amended on April 10, 2014, with CCT pursuant to which CCT will supply us with our entire requirement of Biovance for distribution and sale in the United States, and on April 10, 2014, we entered into a supply agreement with CCT pursuant to which CCT will supply us with our entire requirement of ECMs when they receive regulatory clearance and/or approval in the United States, for distribution and sale in the United States. On September 30, 2014, we entered into a first amendment to the license, marketing and development agreement pursuant to which we received the right to market Biovance for podiatric and orthopedic applications. On the same date, we entered into a second amendment to the Biovance supply agreement pursuant to which the parties amended certain representations and warranties of CCT concerning the shelf-life of the manufactured product. CCT is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Celgene, which owns more than 5% of our voting securities. Jerome Zeldis, M.D., Ph.D., who is the current chairman of our board of directors and director nominee, is the chief executive officer of Celgene Global Health and chief medical officer of Celgene. Perry Karsen, who is a member of our board of directors and director nominee, is the executive vice president and chief operations officer of Celgene and the chief executive officer of CCT.

On November 11, 2013, we entered into a separation and general release agreement with David Stefansky, our former co-executive chairman and current director, pursuant to which Mr. Stefansky’s employment agreement with us, dated as of May 31, 2012, was terminated effective as of December 31, 2012. Pursuant to the separation and general release agreement, in exchange for Mr. Stefansky waiving and releasing us from any claims he may have had against us, all unvested options to purchase shares of our common stock held by Mr. Stefansky were immediately vested in full. On November 11, 2013, retroactively effective to January 1, 2013, and in connection with the simultaneous execution of a separation and general release agreement, we also entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Stefansky, pursuant to which, through December 31, 2014, Mr. Stefansky will provide certain advisory and transitional consulting services to the Company at the Company’s request in exchange for (i) a one-time grant of 186,165 shares of common stock and (ii) monthly payments of $2,500. Mr. Stefansky received these payments from December 2013 through March 2014.

On September 3, 2013, Steven Berger resigned as our chief financial officer, secretary and treasurer, and in connection Mr. Berger’s resignation, we entered into a transition agreement and release, dated September 3, 2013, pursuant to which we granted Mr. Berger an award of nonqualified stock options to purchase 114,286 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.38, which vested immediately upon the execution of a release by Mr. Berger on such date. The options have a term of three years. We paid Mr. Berger’s salary through December 31, 2013 and we also agreed to pay Mr. Berger $600 per month during 2014.

On June 28, 2013, we entered into a separation and general release agreement with Richard Rosenblum, our former president, co-executive chairman and director, pursuant to which Mr. Rosenblum’s employment agreement with us, dated as of May 16, 2012 was terminated effective as of December 31, 2012. Pursuant to the separation and general release agreement, in exchange for Mr. Rosenblum waiving and releasing us from any claims he may have had against us, all unvested options to purchase shares of our common stock held by Mr. Rosenblum were immediately vested in full and we entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Rosenblum, dated as of June 28, 2013, retroactively effective to January 1, 2013. Pursuant to the consulting agreement, through December 31, 2014, Mr. Rosenblum will provide certain consulting services to us at our request in exchange for (i) a one-time grant of 186,165 shares of common stock, and (ii) monthly payments of $2,500. Mr. Rosenblum received these payments from July 2013 through July 2014.

Private Placements

On April 14, 2014, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain accredited investors pursuant to which we issued, in the aggregate, (i) 2,139,287 shares of common stock and (ii) five year warrants to purchase, in the aggregate, up to 427,857 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $10.50 per share, in exchange for aggregate consideration of approximately $14,975,000. The investors in this private placement transaction included Celgene, who purchased 714,286 units at a price per unit of $7.00, for an aggregate purchase price of $5,000,000, Broadfin Healthcare Master Fund, Ltd., a greater than 5% beneficial owner of our common stock, who purchased 500,000 units at a price per unit of $7.00, for an aggregate purchase price of $3,500,000 and Perceptive Life Sciences Master Fund Ltd., together with its affiliates, a greater than 5% beneficial owner of our common stock, who purchased 231,071 units at a price per unit of $7.00, for an aggregate purchase price of $1,617,500.

On April 11, 2014, we entered into a letter agreement with certain of the holders of warrants to purchase shares of our common stock that were granted pursuant to a securities purchase agreement dated November 18, 2013. Pursuant to the letter agreement, any holders that exercised their warrants on or before April 11, 2014 would receive, upon the closing of such transaction, certain registration rights for the shares of common stock that (i) were issued to the exercising holders pursuant to the November purchase agreement and (ii) were issuable upon the exercise of the warrants. On April 11, 2014, we received approximately $5,293,000 upon the exercise of the warrants, and issued a total of 930,313 shares of common stock pursuant to the terms of the warrants. Under the terms of the letter agreement, on or prior to July 9, 2014, we are required, at our expense, to use our reasonable best efforts to prepare and file with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-3 (or such other form if, at such time, we are not eligible to utilize such Form S-3) covering the resale of all of the registrable securities, and we are required to use our reasonable best efforts to cause such registration statement to be declared effective by the SEC as soon as practicable thereafter. Broadfin Healthcare Master Fund, Ltd. and Perceptive Advisors LLC, together with its affiliates, a greater than 5% beneficial owner of our common stock, entered into the letter agreement and purchased 348,432 and 278,746 shares of common stock, respectively, for consideration of $1,982,578.08 and $1,586,064.74, respectively, upon the exercise of these warrants.

On November 14, 2013, we entered into a stock purchase agreement with Celgene, pursuant to which we sold, on November 18, 2013, an aggregate of 1,672,474 shares of our common stock and a five year warrant to purchase an aggregate of 836,237 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $5.69 per share, in exchange for aggregate consideration of $6,000,000. In connection with the stock purchase agreement, Celgene received the right to appoint a director to our board. Accordingly, on November 27, 2013, we increased the size of our board to nine directors and appointed Mr. Karsen, the individual designated by Celgene, as a Class I director, to fill the newly created vacancy and to serve in such capacity until our next annual meeting of shareholders, until his successor is duly elected and qualified, or his earlier death, resignation or removal. Mr. Karsen, who is a member of our board of directors and director nominee, is the executive vice president and chief operations officer of Celgene.

On June 28, 2013, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain accredited investors pursuant to which we issued, in the aggregate, (i) 557,862 shares of common stock and (ii) five year warrants to purchase, in the aggregate, up to 557,862 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.24 per share, in exchange for aggregate consideration of $1,976,925. The investors in this private placement transaction included Jerome Zeldis, M.D., Ph.D., who purchased 197,530 units at a price per unit of $3.54, for an aggregate purchase price of $700,000, David Johnson and David Stefansky, who each purchased 14,109 units at a price per unit of $3.54, for an aggregate purchase price of $50,000 and Joseph Leone and Kenneth Pearsen, who each purchased 2,821 units at a price per unit of $3.54, for an aggregate purchase price of $10,000.

On February 22, 2013, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain accredited investors pursuant to which we issued, in the aggregate, (i) 107,372 shares of common stock and (ii) five year warrants to purchase, in the aggregate, up to 107,372 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $4.24 per share, in exchange for aggregate consideration of $380,500. The investors in this private placement transaction included Jerome Zeldis, M.D., Ph.D., who purchased 28,218 units at a price per unit of $3.54, for an aggregate purchase price of $100,000, David Johnson, David Stefansky and an affiliate of Richard Rosenblum, who each purchased 14,109 units at a price per unit of $3.54, for an aggregate purchase price of $50,000 each and Joseph Leone, who purchased 5,643 units at a price per unit of $3.54, for an aggregate purchase price of $20,000.

In accordance with our audit committee charter, the audit committee is required to approve all related party transactions. In general, the audit committee will review any proposed transaction that has been identified as a related party transaction under Item 404 of Regulation S-K, which means a transaction, arrangement or relationship in which we and any related party are participants in which the amount involved exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at year end for the last two completed fiscal years. A related party includes (i) a director, director nominee or executive officer of us, (ii) a security holder known to be an owner of more than 5% of our voting securities, (iii) an immediate family member of the foregoing or (iv) a corporation or other entity in which any of the foregoing persons is an executive, principal or similar control person or in which such person has a 5% or greater beneficial ownership interest.

Director Independence

The board of directors has determined that each of Andrew Africk, Joseph Leone, Gary Restani, Jeffrey Sklar and Jerome Zeldis, M.D., Ph.D. satisfy the requirements for independence set out in Section 5605(a)(2) of the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules and that each of these directors has no material relationship with us (other than being a director and/or a shareholder). In making its independence determinations, the board of directors sought to identify and analyze all of the facts and circumstances relating to any relationship between a director, his immediate family or affiliates and our company and our affiliates and did not rely on categorical standards other than those contained in the Nasdaq rule referenced above.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The following table presents aggregate fees for professional services rendered by Marcum LLP for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

Audit Fees

Audit fees for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 consist of the aggregate fees billed by Marcum LLP for the audit of the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and review of interim condensed financial statements included in the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. Audit fees also include services related to providing consents to fulfill the accounting firm’s responsibilities under generally accepted accounting principles.

Audit-Related Fees

Audit-related fees for the year ended December 31, 2014 include services in connection with our registration statement on Form S-3 filed in August 2014 and Form S-3/A filed in September 2014. Audit-related fees for the year ended December 31, 2013 include services in connection with our registration statement on Form S-8 filed in January 2014.

Tax Fees

Marcum LLP did not provide any professional services for tax compliance, tax advice or tax planning for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

All Other Fees

All other fees for the year ended December 31, 2014 include services in connection with the audit of our acquisition of Choice Therapeutics, Inc. in May 2014. All other fees for the year ended December 31, 2013 include services in connection with our up-listing to the Nasdaq Capital Market in January 2014.

Pre-Approval of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and Services Policy

Our audit committee pre-approves all auditing and permitted non-audit services to be performed for us by our independent auditor, except for de minimis non-audit services that are approved by the audit committee prior to the completion of the audit. The audit committee may form and delegate authority to subcommittees consisting of one or more members when appropriate, including the authority to grant pre-approvals of audit and permitted non-audit services. The Audit Committee pre-approved all of the fees set forth in the table above.

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

The following documents are filed as part of this report:

None

See “Index to Exhibits” for a description of our exhibits.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: February 24, 2015

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Index to Exhibits

* Filed herewith.

** Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

***Certain exhibits and schedules have been omitted and the Company agrees to furnish supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission a copy of any omitted exhibits upon request.

^ Confidential treatment has been granted with respect to certain portions of this exhibit.

+ Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

ALLIQUA BIOMEDICAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Audit Committee of the

Board of Directors and Shareholders

of Alliqua BioMedical, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Alliqua BioMedical, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Alliqua BioMedical, Inc. and Subsidiaries, as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ Marcum llp

New York, NY

February 24, 2015

ALLIQUA BIOMEDICAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS