AECOM - Quarter Report: 2020 June (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2020

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 0-52423

AECOM

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		61-1088522
State or Other Jurisdiction Of Incorporation or Organization		I.R.S. Employer Identification Number

1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 2600
Los Angeles, California		90067
Address of Principal Executive Offices		Zip Code

(213) 593-8000

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code

Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class		Trading Symbol(s)		Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.01 par value		ACM		New York Stock Exchange

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ⌧ No ◻

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ◻

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer	☒	Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting company	☐
		Emerging growth company	☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ◻

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ⌧

As of July 31, 2020, 160,388,749 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

Table of Contents

AECOM

INDEX


PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	1

Item 1.	Financial Statements	1

	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2020 (unaudited) and September 30, 2019 (unaudited)	1

	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended June 30, 2020 (unaudited) and June 30, 2019 (unaudited)	2

	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended June 30, 2020 (unaudited) and June 30, 2019 (unaudited)	3

	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Three and Nine Months Ended June 30, 2020 (unaudited) and June 30, 2019 (unaudited)	4

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended June 30, 2020 (unaudited) and June 30, 2019 (unaudited)	6

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	7

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	31

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	48

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	49

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION	49

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	49

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	49

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	66

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosure	66

Item 5.	Other Information	66

Item 6.	Exhibits	66

SIGNATURES		68

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

AECOM

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(unaudited - in thousands, except share data)


	June 30,		September 30,
	2020		2019
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,229,479	$	777,476
Cash in consolidated joint ventures		101,789		108,163
Total cash and cash equivalents		1,331,268		885,639
Accounts receivable—net		2,811,876		2,869,216
Contract assets		1,679,983		1,581,806
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		668,739		515,593
Current assets held for sale		743,819		1,633,302
Income taxes receivable		54,677		49,089
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS		7,290,362		7,534,645
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT—NET		388,864		405,605
DEFERRED TAX ASSETS—NET		382,834		288,949
INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES		240,525		256,131
GOODWILL		3,466,584		3,476,813
INTANGIBLE ASSETS—NET		81,995		99,636
OTHER NON-CURRENT ASSETS		153,173		172,134
OPERATING LEASE RIGHT-OF-USE ASSETS		645,391		—
NON-CURRENT ASSETS HELD FOR SALE		395,325		2,316,995
TOTAL ASSETS	$	13,045,053	$	14,550,908

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Short-term debt	$	10,437	$	47,835
Accounts payable		2,098,617		2,410,838
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		2,171,389		1,878,319
Income taxes payable		35,966		59,541
Contract liabilities		945,885		851,040
Current liabilities held for sale		475,116		1,163,654
Current portion of long-term debt		14,261		50,527
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES		5,751,671		6,461,754
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES		132,047		266,304
OPERATING LEASE LIABILITIES		737,438		—
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES HELD FOR SALE		96,915		313,962
DEFERRED TAX LIABILITY—NET		37,910		4,511
PENSION BENEFIT OBLIGATIONS		355,215		387,042
LONG-TERM DEBT		2,047,988		3,217,985
TOTAL LIABILITIES		9,159,184		10,651,558

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 15)

AECOM STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Common stock—authorized, 300,000,000 shares of $0.01 par value as of June 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019; issued and outstanding 160,213,426 and 157,482,983 shares as of June 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019, respectively		1,602		1,575
Additional paid-in capital		4,008,202		3,953,650
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(805,613)		(864,197)
Retained earnings		540,703		599,548
TOTAL AECOM STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY		3,744,894		3,690,576
Noncontrolling interests		140,975		208,774
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY		3,885,869		3,899,350
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	13,045,053	$	14,550,908

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

AECOM

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(unaudited - in thousands, except per share data)


	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,		June 30,		June 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019

Revenue	$	3,189,679	$	3,360,029	$	9,671,026	$	10,128,972
Cost of revenue		3,004,600		3,206,174		9,151,334		9,706,884
Gross profit		185,079		153,855		519,692		422,088

Equity in earnings of joint ventures		8,573		9,186		32,006		32,418
General and administrative expenses		(54,482)		(37,534)		(139,133)		(110,867)
Restructuring costs		(20,300)		—		(96,438)		(79,170)
Income from operations		118,870		125,507		316,127		264,469

Other income		3,119		4,329		9,557		11,075
Interest expense		(34,925)		(40,497)		(112,413)		(121,329)
Income from continuing operations before taxes		87,064		89,339		213,271		154,215
Income tax (benefit) expense for continuing operations		(7,184)		27,203		30,326		(3,114)
Net income from continuing operations		94,248		62,136		182,945		157,329
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations		(126)		43,252		(112,695)		106,664
Net income		94,122		105,388		70,250		263,993

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests from continuing operations		(3,138)		(6,092)		(12,428)		(17,930)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests from discontinued operations		(1,645)		(15,558)		(14,005)		(32,961)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(4,783)		(21,650)		(26,433)		(50,891)

Net income attributable to AECOM from continuing operations		91,110		56,044		170,517		139,399
Net (loss) income attributable to AECOM from discontinued operations		(1,771)		27,694		(126,700)		73,703
Net income attributable to AECOM	$	89,339	$	83,738	$	43,817	$	213,102

Net income attributable to AECOM per share:
Basic continuing operations per share	$	0.57	$	0.36	$	1.07	$	0.89
Basic discontinued operations per share	$	(0.01)	$	0.17	$	(0.79)	$	0.47
Basic earnings per share	$	0.56	$	0.53	$	0.28	$	1.36

Diluted continuing operations per share	$	0.56	$	0.35	$	1.06	$	0.88
Diluted discontinued operations per share	$	(0.01)	$	0.17	$	(0.79)	$	0.46
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.55	$	0.52	$	0.27	$	1.34

Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		160,119		157,429		158,667		156,822
Diluted		161,835		159,787		161,070		159,269

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

AECOM

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(unaudited—in thousands)


	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,		June 30,		June 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019

Net income	$	94,122	$	105,388	$	70,250	$	263,993

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Net unrealized (loss) gain on derivatives, net of tax		(18)		(3,570)		3,157		(13,926)
Foreign currency translation adjustments		71,595		(6,073)		28,113		(5,108)
Pension adjustments, net of tax		4,617		2,464		27,329		4,367
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		76,194		(7,179)		58,599		(14,667)
Comprehensive income, net of tax		170,316		98,209		128,849		249,326
Noncontrolling interests in comprehensive income of consolidated subsidiaries, net of tax		(5,016)		(21,846)		(26,448)		(51,290)
Comprehensive income attributable to AECOM, net of tax	$	165,300	$	76,363	$	102,401	$	198,036

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

AECOM

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

(unaudited—in thousands)


					Accumulated				Total
			Additional		Other				AECOM		Non-		Total
	Common		Paid-In		Comprehensive		Retained		Stockholders’		Controlling		Stockholders’
	Stock		Capital		Loss		Earnings		Equity		Interests		Equity

BALANCE AT MARCH 31, 2020	$	1,589	$	3,960,123	$	(881,574)	$	451,364	$	3,531,502	$	134,021	$	3,665,523
Net income		—		—		—		89,339		89,339		4,783		94,122
Other comprehensive income		—		—		75,961		—		75,961		233		76,194
Issuance of stock		13		37,859		—		—		37,872		—		37,872
Repurchases of stock		—		(280)		—		—		(280)		—		(280)
Stock based compensation		—		10,500		—		—		10,500		—		10,500
Other transactions with noncontrolling interests		—		—		—		—		—		3,545		3,545
Contributions from noncontrolling interests		—		—		—		—		—		2,108		2,108
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		—		—		—		—		—		(3,715)		(3,715)
BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 2020	$	1,602	$	4,008,202	$	(805,613)	$	540,703	$	3,744,894	$	140,975	$	3,885,869



					Accumulated				Total
			Additional		Other				AECOM		Non-		Total
	Common		Paid-In		Comprehensive		Retained		Stockholders’		Controlling		Stockholders’
	Stock		Capital		Loss		Earnings		Equity		Interests		Equity

BALANCE AT SEPTEMBER 30 , 2019	$	1,575	$	3,953,650	$	(864,197)	$	599,548	$	3,690,576	$	208,774	$	3,899,350
Net income		—		—		—		43,817		43,817		26,433		70,250
Cumulative effect of accounting standard adoption		—		—		—		(87,787)		(87,787)		—		(87,787)
Other comprehensive income		—		—		58,584		—		58,584		15		58,599
Issuance of stock		40		53,106		—		—		53,146		—		53,146
Repurchases of stock		(13)		(35,591)		—		(14,875)		(50,479)		—		(50,479)
Stock based compensation		—		37,037		—		—		37,037		—		37,037
Other transactions with noncontrolling interests		—		—		—		—		—		4,361		4,361
Disposal of noncontrolling interest of business sold		—		—		—		—		—		(60,089)		(60,089)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests		—		—		—		—		—		8,289		8,289
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		—		—		—		—		—		(46,808)		(46,808)
BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 2020	$	1,602	$	4,008,202	$	(805,613)	$	540,703	$	3,744,894	$	140,975	$	3,885,869

Table of Contents

AECOM

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

(unaudited—in thousands)


					Accumulated				Total
			Additional		Other				AECOM		Non-		Total
	Common		Paid-In		Comprehensive		Retained		Stockholders’		Controlling		Stockholders’
	Stock		Capital		Loss		Earnings		Equity		Interests		Equity

BALANCE AT MARCH 31, 2019	$	1,573	$	3,904,298	$	(711,021)	$	1,005,086	$	4,199,936	$	194,938	$	4,394,874
Net income		—		—		—		83,738		83,738		21,650		105,388
Other comprehensive loss		—		—		(7,375)		—		(7,375)		196		(7,179)
Issuance of stock		4		11,154		—		—		11,158		—		11,158
Repurchases of stock		—		(109)		—		—		(109)		—		(109)
Stock based compensation		—		15,656		—		—		15,656		—		15,656
Contributions from noncontrolling interests		—		—		—		—		—		30		30
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		—		—		—		—		—		(22,806)		(22,806)
BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 2019	$	1,577	$	3,930,999	$	(718,396)	$	1,088,824	$	4,303,004	$	194,008	$	4,497,012


					Accumulated				Total
			Additional		Other				AECOM		Non-		Total
	Common		Paid-In		Comprehensive		Retained		Stockholders’		Controlling		Stockholders’
	Stock		Capital		Loss		Earnings		Equity		Interests		Equity

BALANCE AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2018	$	1,570	$	3,846,392	$	(703,330)	$	948,148	$	4,092,780	$	185,594	$	4,278,374
Net income		—		—		—		213,102		213,102		50,891		263,993
Cumulative effect of accounting standard adoption		—		—		—		(12,453)		(12,453)		—		(12,453)
Other comprehensive loss		—		—		(15,066)		—		(15,066)		399		(14,667)
Issuance of stock		42		59,833		—		—		59,875		—		59,875
Repurchases of stock		(35)		(22,675)		—		(59,973)		(82,683)		—		(82,683)
Stock based compensation		—		47,449		—		—		47,449		—		47,449
Other transactions with noncontrolling interests		—		—		—		—		—		15,922		15,922
Contributions from noncontrolling interests		—		—		—		—		—		3,180		3,180
Distributions to noncontrolling interests		—		—		—		—		—		(61,978)		(61,978)
BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 2019	$	1,577	$	3,930,999	$	(718,396)	$	1,088,824	$	4,303,004	$	194,008	$	4,497,012

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

AECOM

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited - in thousands)


	Nine Months Ended June 30,
	2020		2019
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	70,250	$	263,993
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		181,440		193,484
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures		(4,084)		(67,030)
Distribution of earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures		47,675		41,195
Non-cash stock compensation		37,037		47,449
Gain on sale of discontinued operations		(161,900)		—
Loss on disposal activities		—		7,404
Impairment of goodwill and intangibles		89,288		—
Foreign currency translation		40,618		(180)
Other non-cash adjustments		14,265		4,835
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable and contract assets		(315,983)		(340,445)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(51,033)		11,554
Accounts payable		(385,479)		(103,962)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		(4,427)		(30,082)
Contract liabilities		82,212		37,612
Other long-term liabilities		40,391		(81,914)
Net cash used in operating activities		(319,730)		(16,087)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations, net of cash disposed		2,218,866		—
Proceeds from disposal of business, net of cash disposed		—		37,412
Investment in unconsolidated joint ventures		(89,283)		(117,251)
Return of investment in unconsolidated joint ventures		17,042		16,584
Proceeds from sale of investments		8,277		11,987
Payments for purchase of investments		—		(3,223)
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment		2,510		8,250
Payments for capital expenditures		(83,266)		(77,365)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		2,074,146		(123,606)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from borrowings under credit agreements		4,203,556		6,396,503
Repayments of borrowings under credit agreements		(5,547,055)		(6,263,040)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		17,231		24,369
Payments to repurchase common stock		(50,479)		(82,683)
Net distributions to noncontrolling interests		(38,519)		(58,798)
Other financing activities		9,730		30,059
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(1,405,536)		46,410

EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH		(4,885)		117
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		343,995		(93,166)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD		1,080,354		886,733
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD		1,424,349		793,567
LESS: CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS INCLUDED IN CURRENT ASSETS HELD FOR SALE		(93,081)		(151,904)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS OF CONTINUING OPERATIONS AT END OF PERIOD	$	1,331,268	$	641,663

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

AECOM

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of AECOM (the Company) are unaudited and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments, including all normal recurring items necessary for a fair statement of the Company’s financial position and results of operations for the periods presented. All intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

The consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019 (the Annual Report). The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States (U.S.) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.

The consolidated financial statements included in this report have been prepared consistently with the accounting policies described in the Annual Report, except as noted, and should be read together with the Annual Report.

The results of operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2020 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2020.

On January 31, 2020, the Company completed the sale of its Management Services business to an affiliate of American Securities LLC and Lindsay Goldberg LLC for total consideration of approximately $2.4 billion. Additionally, as discussed in more detail in Note 3, the Company concluded that its self-perform at-risk construction businesses met the criteria for held for sale beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2020. Collectively, the Management Services business and the self-perform at-risk construction businesses met the criteria for discontinued operation classification. As a result, the Management Services business and the self-perform at-risk construction businesses are presented in the consolidated statements of operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Current and non-current assets and liabilities of these businesses not sold as of the balance sheet date are presented in the consolidated balance sheets as assets and liabilities held for sale.

The Company reports its annual results of operations based on 52 or 53-week periods ending on the Friday nearest September 30. The Company reports its quarterly results of operations based on periods ending on the Friday nearest December 31, March 31, and June 30. For clarity of presentation, all periods are presented as if the periods ended on September 30, December 31, March 31, and June 30.

2. New Accounting Pronouncements and Changes in Accounting

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued new accounting guidance which amended the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. The new accounting guidance establishes principles for recognizing revenue upon the transfer of promised goods or services to customers, in an amount that reflects the expected consideration received in exchange for those goods or services. The Company adopted the new standard on October 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective method, which resulted in an adjustment to retained earnings of $7.0 million, net of tax. Detailed disclosures regarding the adoption and other required disclosures can be found in Note 4.

In February 2016, the FASB issued new accounting guidance which changes accounting requirements for leases. The new guidance requires lessees to recognize the assets and liabilities arising from all leases, including those classified as operating leases under previous accounting guidance, on the balance sheet. It also requires disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements to increase transparency and comparability among organizations. The Company adopted the new guidance beginning October 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective adoption method, which resulted

Table of Contents

in a downward adjustment to retained earnings of $87.8 million, net of tax. Detailed disclosures regarding the adoption and other required disclosures can be found in Note 12.

In June 2016, the FASB issued a new credit loss standard that changes the impairment model for most financial assets and some other instruments. The new guidance will replace the current “incurred loss” approach with an “expected loss” model for instruments measured at amortized cost. It also simplifies the accounting model for purchased credit-impaired debt securities and loans. The guidance will be effective for the Company’s fiscal year starting October 1, 2020. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the new guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2018, the FASB issued new accounting guidance which provides entities the option to reclassify certain tax effects from other comprehensive income to retained earnings. The guidance addresses a narrow-scope financial reporting issue related to the tax effects that may become stranded in accumulated other comprehensive income as a result of the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Under the guidance, an entity may elect to reclassify the income tax effects of the Tax Act on items within accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. The Company has determined that it will not make this election.

In August 2018, the FASB issued new accounting guidance aligning the capitalization of certain implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with previously existing guidance for capitalizing costs incurred to develop internal-use software. The new guidance will be effective for the Company’s fiscal year starting October 1, 2020. The Company does not expect that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued new accounting guidance amending the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. These improvements will require more disclosure for amounts measured at fair value, and specifically unobservable inputs used in fair value measurements. The Company expects to adopt the new guidance starting on October 1, 2020. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the new guidance will have on its financial reporting process.

In March 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted final rules that amend the financial disclosure requirement for guarantors of registered debt securities in Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X. The new rules amend and streamline the disclosures required by guarantors and issuers of guaranteed securities. Among other things, the new disclosures may be located outside the financial statements. The new rule is effective January 4, 2021, and early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted the new rule on March 31, 2020. Accordingly, the revised condensed consolidating financial information is presented in Item 2, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

3. Discontinued Operations, Goodwill and Intangible Assets

On October 12, 2019, the Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement with Maverick Purchaser Sub, LLC (“Purchaser”), an affiliate of American Securities LLC and Lindsay Goldberg LLC. Per the terms of that agreement, the Company agreed to transfer the assets and liabilities constituting its Management Services business to the Purchaser. The transaction with the Purchaser closed on January 31, 2020. The Company received total cash consideration of $2.28 billion inclusive of the receipt in the third quarter of fiscal 2020 of $122.0 million received in connection with a favorable working capital purchase price adjustment and contingent consideration of approximately $120 million attributable to certain claims related to prior work and engagements. As a result of the sale, the Company recognized a pre-tax gain of $161.9 million, of which $147.0 million was recognized in the three-month period ending March 31, 2020. During the third quarter of fiscal 2020, the Company’s receipt of $122.0 million in connection with a favorable net working capital purchase price adjustment settlement that resulted in an additional gain of $14.9 million. The gain on sale for both periods was included in the net income from discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Table of Contents

Additionally, in the first quarter of fiscal 2020, management approved a plan to dispose via sale the Company’s self-perform at-risk construction businesses within the next year. These businesses include the Company’s civil infrastructure, power, and oil and gas construction businesses that were previously reported in the Company’s Construction Services segment. After consideration of the relevant facts, the Company concluded the assets and liabilities of its Management Services business and its self-perform at-risk construction businesses met the criteria for classification as held for sale. Additionally, the Company concluded the actual and proposed disposal activities represented a strategic shift that will have a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results and qualified for presentation as discontinued operations in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 205-20. Accordingly, the financial results of the Management Services business and the self-perform at-risk construction businesses are presented in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Current and non-current assets and liabilities of these businesses not sold as of the balance sheet date are presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as assets and liabilities held for sale for both periods presented. Interest expense allocated to discontinued operations represents interest expenses for the discontinued operations’ finance leases and term loans, which were required to be settled upon the sale of the Management Services business.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2020, the Company identified indicators of impairment for the self-perform at-risk construction business. Specifically, the Company's forecast for its Oil and Gas business decreased significantly from the prior period due primarily to the volatility in global oil prices, which negatively impacted forecasts for future revenues and earnings. As a result, the Company assessed the Oil and Gas business for impairment and determined the fair value of the disposal group was lower than its carrying value. Fair value was estimated using Level 3 inputs, such as forecasted cash flows. Accordingly, the Company recorded impairment losses for that business' goodwill of approximately $83.6 million and intangible assets of approximately $5.7 million. These impairment losses were recorded in net loss from discontinued operations on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The following table represents summarized balance sheet information of assets and liabilities held for sale (in millions):


	June 30,		September 30,
	2020		2019

Cash and cash equivalents	$	93.1	$	194.7
Receivables and contract assets		631.1		1,326.6
Other		19.6		112.0
Current assets held for sale	$	743.8	$	1,633.3

Property and equipment, net	$	116.2	$	153.8
Goodwill		—		1,798.5
Other		279.1		364.7
Non-current assets held for sale	$	395.3	$	2,317.0

Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	402.5	$	1,056.0
Contract liabilities		70.5		88.9
Other		2.1		18.8
Current liabilities held for sale	$	475.1	$	1,163.7

Long-term liabilities held for sale	$	96.9	$	314.0

Table of Contents

The following table represents summarized income statement information of discontinued operations (in millions):


	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	June 30,		June 30,		June 30,		June 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019

Revenue	$	347.5	$	1,620.2	$	2,661.8	$	4,928.8
Cost of revenue		352.5		1,564.8		2,708.5		4,775.7
Gross (loss) profit		(5.0)		55.4		(46.7)		153.1
Equity in earnings of joint ventures		(11.1)		19.4		(28.0)		34.7
Gain (loss) on disposal activities		14.9		(7.4)		161.9		(7.4)
Transaction costs		—		—		(41.4)		—
Impairment of goodwill and intangibles assets		—		—		(89.3)		—
(Loss) income from operations		(1.2)		67.4		(43.5)		180.4
Other (expense) income		(0.2)		0.8		1.6		2.0
Interest expense		(1.5)		(15.5)		(40.2)		(48.8)
(Loss) income before taxes		(2.9)		52.7		(82.1)		133.6
Income tax (benefit) expense		(2.8)		9.4		30.6		26.9
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations	$	(0.1)	$	43.3	$	(112.7)	$	106.7

The significant components included in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the discontinued operations are as follows (in millions):


	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	June 30,		June 30,		June 30,		June 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019

Depreciation and amortization:
Property and equipment	$	—	$	6.8	$	4.6	$	20.5
Intangible assets and capitalized debt issuance costs	$	4.3	$	16.4	$	35.8	$	49.4
Payments for capital expenditures	$	(2.6)	$	(4.9)	$	(16.8)	$	(14.1)

The changes in the carrying value of goodwill by reportable segment for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 were as follows:


			Foreign
	September 30,		Exchange		June 30,
	2019		Impact		2020

	(in millions)
Americas	$	2,623.0	$	(6.3)	$	2,616.7
International		853.8		(3.9)		849.9
Total	$	3,476.8	$	(10.2)	$	3,466.6

The gross amounts and accumulated amortization of the Company’s acquired identifiable intangible assets with finite useful lives as of June 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019, included in intangible assets—net, in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, were as follows:


	June 30, 2020						September 30, 2019
	Gross		Accumulated		Intangible		Gross		Accumulated		Intangible		Amortization
	Amount		Amortization		Assets, Net		Amount		Amortization		Assets, Net		Period

	(in millions)												(years)
Backlog and customer relationships	$	662.1	$	(580.1)	$	82.0	$	661.4	$	(561.8)	$	99.6	1	-	11

Table of Contents

Amortization expense of acquired intangible assets included within cost of revenue was $18.3 million and $19.0 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The following table presents estimated amortization expense of existing intangible assets for the remainder of fiscal 2020 and for the succeeding years:


Fiscal Year	(in millions)
2020 (three months remaining)	$	5.6
2021		20.2
2022		19.4
2023		18.6
2024		17.2
Thereafter		1.0
Total	$	82.0

4. Revenue Recognition

On October 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASC 606 on a modified retrospective basis, which amended the accounting standards for revenue recognition. As a result, the new guidance was applied retrospectively to contracts which were not completed as of October 1, 2018. Contracts completed prior to October 1, 2018 were accounted for using the guidance in effect at that time. The cumulative effect of applying the new guidance was recorded as a reduction to retained earnings at October 1, 2018 of $7.0 million, net of tax. Consistent with the modified retrospective transition approach, the comparative period was not adjusted to conform with current period presentation. The adjustment was primarily related to segmenting or combining contracts by performance obligations identified under the criteria of the new standard.

The new accounting guidance establishes principles for recognizing revenue upon the transfer of control of promised goods or services to customers, in an amount that reflects the expected consideration received in exchange for those goods or services. The Company generally recognizes revenues over time as performance obligations are satisfied. The Company generally measures its progress to completion using an input measure of total costs incurred divided by total costs expected to be incurred. In the course of providing its services, the Company routinely subcontracts for services and incurs other direct costs on behalf of its clients. These costs are passed through to clients and, in accordance with GAAP, are included in the Company’s revenue and cost of revenue. These subcontractor and other direct costs for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 were $5.1 billion and $5.5 billion, respectively.

Recognition of revenue and profit is dependent upon a number of factors, including the accuracy of a variety of estimates made at the balance sheet date, such as engineering progress, material quantities, the achievement of milestones, penalty provisions, labor productivity and cost estimates. Additionally, the Company is required to make estimates for the amount of consideration to be received, including bonuses, awards, incentive fees, claims, unpriced change orders, penalties, and liquidated damages. Variable consideration is included in the estimate of the transaction price only to the extent that a significant reversal would not be probable. Management continuously monitors factors that may affect the quality of its estimates, and material changes in estimates are disclosed accordingly. Costs attributable to claims are treated as costs of contract performance as incurred.

The following summarizes the Company’s major contract types:

Cost Reimbursable Contracts

Cost reimbursable contracts include cost-plus fixed fee, cost-plus fixed rate, and time-and-materials price contracts. Under cost-plus contracts, the Company charges clients for its costs, including both direct and indirect costs, plus a negotiated fee or rate. The Company recognizes revenue based on actual direct costs incurred and the applicable fixed rate or portion of the fixed fee earned as of the balance sheet date. Under time-and-materials price contracts, the Company negotiates hourly billing rates and charges its clients based on the actual time that it expends on a project. In addition, clients reimburse the Company for materials and other direct incidental expenditures incurred in connection with its performance under the contract. The Company may apply a practical expedient to recognize revenue in the

Table of Contents

amount in which it has the right to invoice if its right to consideration is equal to the value of performance completed to date.

Guaranteed Maximum Price Contracts (GMP)

GMP contracts share many of the same contract provisions as cost-plus and fixed-price contracts. As with cost-plus contracts, clients are provided a disclosure of all the project costs, and a lump sum or percentage fee is separately identified. The Company provides clients with a guaranteed price for the overall project (adjusted for change orders issued by clients) and a schedule including the expected completion date. Cost overruns or costs associated with project delays in completion could generally be the Company’s responsibility. For many of the Company’s commercial or residential GMP contracts, the final price is generally not established until the Company has subcontracted a substantial percentage of the trade contracts with terms consistent with the master contract, and it has negotiated additional contractual limitations, such as waivers of consequential damages as well as aggregate caps on liabilities and liquidated damages. Revenue is recognized for GMP contracts as project costs are incurred relative to total estimated project costs.

Fixed-Price Contracts

Fixed price contracts include both lump-sum and fixed-unit price contracts. Under lump-sum contracts, the Company performs all the work under the contract for a specified fee. Lump-sum contracts are typically subject to price adjustments if the scope of the project changes or unforeseen conditions arise. Under fixed-unit price contracts, the Company performs a number of units of work at an agreed price per unit with the total payment under the contract determined by the actual number of units delivered. Revenue is recognized for fixed-price contracts using the input method measured on a cost-to-cost basis.

The following tables present the Company’s revenues disaggregated by revenue sources:


	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	June 30,		June 30,		June 30,		June 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019

	(in millions)
Cost reimbursable	$	1,369.3	$	1,496.3	$	4,252.5	$	4,396.7
Guaranteed maximum price		829.8		950.5		2,706.4		2,984.4
Fixed price		990.6		913.2		2,712.1		2,747.9
Total revenue	$	3,189.7	$	3,360.0	$	9,671.0	$	10,129.0


	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	June 30,		June 30,		June 30,		June 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019

	(in millions)
Americas	$	2,471.8	$	2,565.2	$	7,400.5	$	7,707.6
Europe, Middle East, Africa		359.9		425.4		1,194.9		1,318.9
Asia Pacific		358.0		369.4		1,075.6		1,102.5
Total revenue	$	3,189.7	$	3,360.0	$	9,671.0	$	10,129.0

As of June 30, 2020, the Company had allocated $19.1 billion of transaction price to unsatisfied or partially satisfied performance obligations, of which approximately 60% is expected to be satisfied within the next twelve months.

Contract liabilities represent amounts billed to clients in excess of revenue recognized to date. The Company recognized revenue of $563.1 million and $485.0 million during the nine months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, that was included in contract liabilities as of September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

The Company’s timing of revenue recognition may not be consistent with its rights to bill and collect cash from its clients. Those rights are generally dependent upon advance billing terms, milestone billings based on the completion of certain phases of work or when services are performed. The Company’s accounts receivable represent amounts billed

Table of Contents

to clients that have yet to be collected and represent an unconditional right to cash from its clients. Contract assets represent the amount of contract revenue recognized but not yet billed pursuant to contract terms or accounts billed after the balance sheet date. Contract liabilities represent billings as of the balance sheet date, as allowed under the terms of a contract, but not yet recognized as contract revenue pursuant to the Company’s revenue recognition policy.

Net accounts receivable consisted of the following:


	June 30,		September 30,
	2020		2019

	(in millions)
Billed	$	2,293.2	$	2,284.8
Contract retentions		585.1		641.5
Total accounts receivable—gross		2,878.3		2,926.3
Allowance for doubtful accounts		(66.4)		(57.1)
Total accounts receivable—net	$	2,811.9	$	2,869.2

Substantially all contract assets as of June 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019 are expected to be billed and collected within twelve months, except for claims. Significant claims recorded in contract assets and other non-current assets were approximately $110 million as of both June 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019. The asset related to the Deactivation, Demolition, and Removal Project retained from the Purchaser discussed in Note 15 is presented in prepaid expense and other current assets from continuing operations in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Contract retentions represent amounts invoiced to clients where payments have been withheld from progress payments until the contracted work has been completed and approved by the client. These retention agreements vary from project to project and could be outstanding for several months or years.

Allowances for doubtful accounts have been determined through specific identification of amounts considered to be uncollectible and potential write-offs, plus a non-specific allowance for other amounts for which some potential loss has been determined to be probable based on current and past experience.

Other than the U.S. federal government, no single client accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s outstanding receivables at June 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019.

The Company sold trade receivables to financial institutions, of which $140.8 million and $91.9 million were outstanding as of June 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019, respectively. The Company does not retain financial or legal obligations for these receivables that would result in material losses. The Company’s ongoing involvement is limited to the remittance of customer payments to the financial institutions with respect to the sold trade receivables.

5. Joint Ventures and Variable Interest Entities

The Company’s joint ventures provide architecture, engineering, program management, construction management, operations and maintenance services, and invest in real estate projects. Joint ventures, the combination of two or more partners, are generally formed for a specific project. Management of the joint venture is typically controlled by a joint venture executive committee, comprised of representatives from the joint venture partners. The joint venture executive committee normally provides management oversight and controls decisions which could have a significant impact on the joint venture.

Some of the Company’s joint ventures have no employees and minimal operating expenses. For these joint ventures, the Company’s employees perform work for the joint venture, which is then billed to a third-party customer by the joint venture. These joint ventures function as pass through entities to bill the third-party customer. For consolidated joint ventures of this type, the Company records the entire amount of the services performed and the costs associated with these services, including the services provided by the other joint venture partners, in the Company’s result of operations. For certain of these joint ventures where a fee is added by an unconsolidated joint venture to client billings, the Company’s portion of that fee is recorded in equity in earnings of joint ventures.

Table of Contents

The Company also has joint ventures that have their own employees and operating expenses, and to which the Company generally makes a capital contribution. The Company accounts for these joint ventures either as consolidated entities or equity method investments based on the criteria further discussed below.

The Company follows guidance on the consolidation of variable interest entities (VIEs) that requires companies to utilize a qualitative approach to determine whether it is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. The process for identifying the primary beneficiary of a VIE requires consideration of the factors that indicate a party has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the joint venture’s economic performance, including powers granted to the joint venture’s program manager, powers contained in the joint venture governing board and, to a certain extent, a company’s economic interest in the joint venture. The Company analyzes its joint ventures and classifies them as either:

●

a VIE that must be consolidated because the Company is the primary beneficiary or the joint venture is not a VIE and the Company holds the majority voting interest with no significant participative rights available to the other partners; or

●

a VIE that does not require consolidation and is treated as an equity method investment because the Company is not the primary beneficiary or the joint venture is not a VIE and the Company does not hold the majority voting interest.

As part of the above analysis, if it is determined that the Company has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the joint venture’s economic performance, the Company considers whether or not it has the obligation to absorb losses or rights to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

Contractually required support provided to the Company’s joint ventures is further discussed in Note 15.

Summary of financial information of the consolidated joint ventures is as follows:


	June 30,
	2020		September 30,
	(unaudited)		2019

	(in millions)
Current assets	$	537.4	$	581.3
Non-current assets		77.6		75.4
Total assets	$	615.0	$	656.7

Current liabilities	$	393.8	$	432.8
Non-current liabilities		1.5		—
Total liabilities		395.3		432.8
Total AECOM equity		130.7		137.9
Noncontrolling interests		89.0		86.0
Total owners’ equity		219.7		223.9
Total liabilities and owners’ equity	$	615.0	$	656.7

Total revenue of the consolidated joint ventures was $602.1 million and $869.8 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The assets of the Company’s consolidated joint ventures are restricted for use only by the particular joint venture and are not available for the general operations of the Company.

Table of Contents

Summary of unaudited financial information of the unconsolidated joint ventures, as derived from their unaudited financial statements, is as follows:


	June 30,		September 30,
	2020		2019

	(in millions)
Current assets	$	1,118.1	$	1,133.5
Non-current assets		455.1		904.5
Total assets	$	1,573.2	$	2,038.0

Current liabilities	$	962.7	$	1,115.5
Non-current liabilities		70.0		182.3
Total liabilities		1,032.7		1,297.8
Joint ventures’ equity		540.5		740.2
Total liabilities and joint ventures’ equity	$	1,573.2	$	2,038.0

AECOM’s investment in joint ventures	$	240.5	$	256.1


	Nine Months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,
	2020		2019

	(in millions)
Revenue	$	2,325.7	$	2,259.4
Cost of revenue		2,281.7		2,186.8
Gross profit	$	44.0	$	72.6
Net income	$	42.7	$	71.6

Summary of AECOM’s equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures is as follows:


	Nine Months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,
	2020		2019

	(in millions)
Pass through joint ventures	$	26.0	$	24.4
Other joint ventures		6.0		8.0
Total	$	32.0	$	32.4

6. Pension Benefit Obligations

In the U.S., the Company sponsors various qualified defined benefit pension plans. Benefits under these plans generally are based on the employee’s years of creditable service and compensation; however, all U.S. defined benefit plans are closed to new participants and have frozen accruals.

The Company also sponsors various non-qualified plans in the U.S.; all of these plans are frozen. Outside the U.S., the Company sponsors various pension plans, which are appropriate to the country in which the Company operates, some of which are government mandated.

Table of Contents

The components of net periodic benefit cost other than the service cost component are included in other income in the consolidated statement of operations. The following table details the components of net periodic benefit cost for the Company’s pension plans for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019:


	Three Months Ended								Nine months Ended
	June 30, 2020				June 30, 2019				June 30, 2020				June 30, 2019
	U.S.		Int’l		U.S.		Int’l		U.S.		Int’l		U.S.		Int’l

	(in millions)
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
Service costs	$	—	$	0.1	$	—	$	0.2	$	—	$	0.4	$	—	$	0.4
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation		1.6		5.4		1.1		7.4		4.8		16.7		5.4		22.5
Expected return on plan assets		(1.8)		(9.1)		(2.2)		(9.6)		(5.3)		(27.9)		(6.7)		(28.9)
Amortization of prior service cost		—		—		—		—		0.1		—		0.1		(0.1)
Amortization of net loss		1.3		2.1		1.0		1.0		3.7		6.4		2.9		3.1
Curtailment loss recognized		0.5		—		—		—		0.5		—		—		—
Settlement loss recognized		—		—		—		—		0.5		0.2		0.1		0.1
Net periodic benefit cost	$	1.6	$	(1.5)	$	(0.1)	$	(1.0)	$	4.3	$	(4.2)	$	1.8	$	(2.9)

The total amounts of employer contributions paid for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 were $5.5 million for U.S. plans and $20.7 million for non-U.S. plans. The expected remaining scheduled annual employer contributions for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2020 are $1.7 million for U.S. plans and $6.7 million for non-U.S. plans.

7. Debt

Debt consisted of the following:


	June 30,		September 30,
	2020		2019

	(in millions)
2014 Credit Agreement	$	—	$	1,182.2
2014 Senior Notes		800.0		800.0
2017 Senior Notes		1,000.0		1,000.0
URS Senior Notes		248.2		248.1
Other debt		48.1		122.2
Total debt		2,096.3		3,352.5
Less: Current portion of debt and short-term borrowings		(24.7)		(98.3)
Less: Unamortized debt issuance costs		(23.6)		(36.2)
Long-term debt	$	2,048.0	$	3,218.0

The following table presents, in millions, scheduled maturities of the Company’s debt as of June 30, 2020:


Fiscal Year
2020 (three months remaining)	$	14.7
2021		12.1
2022		258.2
2023		6.8
2024		3.3
Thereafter		1,801.2
Total	$	2,096.3

2014 Credit Agreement

The Company entered into a credit agreement (Credit Agreement) on October 17, 2014, which, as amended to date, consists of (i) a term loan A facility that includes a $510 million (US) term loan A facility with a term expiring on March 13, 2021 and a $500 million Canadian dollar (CAD) term loan A facility and a $250 million Australian dollar (AUD) term loan A facility, each with terms expiring on March 13, 2023; (ii) a $600 million term loan B facility with a term expiring on March 13, 2025; and (iii) a revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of $1.35 billion

Table of Contents

with a term expiring on March 13, 2023. Some of subsidiaries of the Company (Guarantors) have guaranteed the obligations of the borrowers under the Credit Agreement. The borrowers’ obligations under the Credit Agreement are secured by a lien on substantially all of the assets of the Company and the Guarantors pursuant to a security and pledge agreement (Security Agreement). The collateral under the Security Agreement is subject to release upon fulfillment of conditions specified in the Credit Agreement and Security Agreement.

The Credit Agreement contains covenants that limit the ability of the Company and the ability of some of its subsidiaries to, among other things: (i) create, incur, assume, or suffer to exist liens; (ii) incur or guarantee indebtedness; (iii) pay dividends or repurchase stock; (iv) enter into transactions with affiliates; (v) consummate asset sales, acquisitions or mergers; (vi) enter into various types of burdensome agreements; or (vii) make investments.

On July 1, 2015, the Credit Agreement was amended to revise the definition of “Consolidated EBITDA” to increase the allowance for acquisition and integration expenses related to the Company’s acquisition of the URS Corporation (URS) in October 2014.

On December 22, 2015, the Credit Agreement was amended to further revise the definition of “Consolidated EBITDA” by further increasing the allowance for acquisition and integration expenses related to the acquisition of URS and to allow for an internal corporate restructuring primarily involving the Company’s international subsidiaries.

On September 29, 2016, the Credit Agreement and the Security Agreement were amended to (1) lower the applicable interest rate margins for the term loan A and the revolving credit facilities, and lower the applicable letter of credit fees and commitment fees to the revised consolidated leverage levels; (2) extend the term of the term loan A and the revolving credit facility to September 29, 2021; (3) add a new delayed draw term loan A facility tranche in the amount of $185.0 million; (4) replace the then existing $500 million performance letter of credit facility with a $500 million basket to enter into secured letters of credit outside the Credit Agreement; and (5) revise covenants, including the Maximum Consolidated Leverage Ratio so that the step down from a 5.00 to a 4.75 leverage ratio is effective as of March 31, 2017 as well as the investment basket for the Company’s AECOM Capital business.

On March 31, 2017, the Credit Agreement was amended to (1) expand the ability of restricted subsidiaries to borrow under “Incremental Term Loans;” (2) revise the definition of “Working Capital” as used in “Excess Cash Flow;” (3) revise the definitions for “Consolidated EBITDA” and “Consolidated Funded Indebtedness” to reflect the expected gain and debt repayment of an AECOM Capital disposition, which disposition was completed on April 28, 2017; and (4) amend provisions relating to the Company’s ability to undertake internal restructuring steps to accommodate changes in tax laws.

On March 13, 2018, the Credit Agreement was amended to (1) refinance the existing term loan A facility to include a $510 million (US) term loan A facility with a term expiring on March 13, 2021 and a $500 million CAD term loan A facility and a $250 million AUD term loan A facility each with terms expiring on March 13, 2023; (2) issue a new $600 million term loan B facility to institutional investors with a term expiring on March 13, 2025; (3) increase the capacity of the Company’s revolving credit facility from $1.05 billion to $1.35 billion and extend its term until March 13, 2023; (4) reduce the Company’s interest rate borrowing costs as follows: (a) the term loan B facility, at the Company’s election, Base Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus 0.75% or Eurocurrency Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus 1.75%, (b) the (US) term loan A facility, at the Company’s election, Base Rate plus 0.50% or Eurocurrency Rate plus 1.50%, and (c) the Canadian (CAD) term loan A facility, the Australian (AUD) term loan A facility, and the revolving credit facility, an initial rate of, at the Company’s election, Base Rate plus 0.75% or Eurocurrency Rate plus 1.75%, and after the end of the Company’s fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2018, Base Rate loans plus a margin ranging from 0.25% to 1.00% or Eurocurrency Rate plus a margin from 1.25% to 2.00%, based on the Consolidated Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement); (5) revise covenants including increasing the amounts available under the restricted payment negative covenant and revising the Maximum Consolidated Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) to include a 4.5 leverage ratio through September 30, 2019 after which the leverage ratio stepped down to 4.0.

Table of Contents

On November 13, 2018, the Credit Agreement was amended to revise the definition of "Consolidated EBITDA" to increase corporate restructuring allowances and provide for additional flexibility under the covenants for non-core asset dispositions, among other changes.

On January 28, 2020, AECOM entered into Amendment No. 7 to the Credit Agreement which modifies the asset disposition covenant to permit the sale of our Management Services business and the mandatory prepayment provision so that only outstanding term loans were prepaid using the net proceeds from the sale.

On May 1, 2020, the Company entered into Amendment No. 8 to the Credit Agreement which allows for borrowings to be made, until three months after closing, up to an aggregate principal amount of $400,000,000 under a secured delayed draw term loan facility, the proceeds of which are permitted to be used to pay all or a portion of the amounts payable in connection with any tender for or redemption or repayment of the Company's or its subsidiaries' existing senior unsecured notes and any associated fees and expenses. The amendment also revised certain terms and covenants in the Credit Agreement, including by, among other things, the maximum leverage ratio covenant to 4.00:1.00, subject to increases to 4.50:1.00 for certain specified periods in connection with certain material acquisitions, increasing the potential size of incremental facilities under the Credit Agreement, revising the definition of "Consolidated EBITDA" to provide for additional flexibility in the calculation thereof and adding a Eurocurrency Rate floor of 0.75% to the interest rate under the revolving credit facility.

On July 30, 2020, the Company drew $248.5 million on its secured delayed draw term loan facility for the purpose of redeeming all of the 2022 URS Senior Notes.

Under the Credit Agreement, the Company is subject to a maximum consolidated leverage ratio and minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio at the end of each fiscal quarter. The Company’s Consolidated Leverage Ratio was 2.8 at June 30, 2020. The Company’s Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio was 5.2 at June 30, 2020. As of June 30, 2020, the Company was in compliance with the covenants of the Credit Agreement.

At June 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019, outstanding standby letters of credit totaled $21.2 million and $22.8 million, respectively, under the Company’s revolving credit facilities. As of June 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019, the Company had $1,328.8 million and $1,327.2 million, respectively, available under its revolving credit facility.

2014 Senior Notes

On October 6, 2014, the Company completed a private placement offering of $800,000,000 aggregate principal amount of the unsecured 5.750% Senior Notes due 2022 (2022 Notes) and $800,000,000 aggregate principal amount of the unsecured 5.875% Senior Notes due 2024 (the 2024 Notes and, together with the 2022 Notes, the 2014 Senior Notes). On November 2, 2015, the Company completed an exchange offer to exchange the unregistered 2014 Senior Notes for registered notes, as well as all related guarantees. On March 16, 2018, the Company redeemed all of the 2022 Notes at a redemption price that was 104.313% of the principal amount outstanding plus accrued and unpaid interest. The March 16, 2018 redemption resulted in a $34.5 million prepayment premium, which was included in interest expense.

As of June 30, 2020, the estimated fair value of the 2024 Notes was approximately $858.0 million. The fair value of the 2024 Notes as of June 30, 2020 was derived by taking the mid-point of the trading prices from an observable market input (Level 2) in the secondary bond market and multiplying it by the outstanding balance of the 2024 Notes.

On July 21, 2020, the Company completed a cash tender offer for up to $639 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2024 Notes and the 2017 Senior Notes. The Company accepted for purchase all of 2024 Notes validly tendered and not validly withdrawn pursuant to the cash tender offer, amounting to $2.7 million aggregate principal amount of the 2024 Notes. The Company made the cash tender offer at par to satisfy obligations under the indentures governing the 2024 Notes and the 2017 Senior Notes relating to the use of certain cash proceeds from its disposition of the Management Services business, which was completed on January 31, 2020.

Table of Contents

At any time prior to July 15, 2024, the Company may redeem on one or more occasions all or part of the 2024 Notes at a redemption price equal to the sum of (i) 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus (ii) a “make-whole” premium as of the date of the redemption, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. In addition, on or after July 15, 2024, the 2024 Notes may be redeemed at a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption.

The indenture pursuant to which the 2024 Notes were issued contains customary events of default, including, among other things, payment default, exchange default, failure to provide notices thereunder and provisions related to bankruptcy events. The indenture also contains customary negative covenants.

The Company was in compliance with the covenants relating to the 2024 Notes as of June 30, 2020.

2017 Senior Notes

On February 21, 2017, the Company completed a private placement offering of $1,000,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its unsecured 5.125% Senior Notes due 2027 (the 2017 Senior Notes) and used the proceeds to immediately retire the remaining $127.6 million outstanding on the then existing term loan B facility as well as repay $600 million of the term loan A facility and $250 million of the revolving credit facility under its Credit Agreement. On June 30, 2017, the Company completed an exchange offer to exchange the unregistered 2017 Senior Notes for registered notes, as well as related guarantees.

As of June 30, 2020, the estimated fair value of the 2017 Senior Notes was approximately $1,065.0 million. The fair value of the 2017 Senior Notes as of June 30, 2020 was derived by taking the mid-point of the trading prices from an observable market input (Level 2) in the secondary bond market and multiplying it by the outstanding balance of the 2017 Senior Notes. Interest will be payable on the 2017 Senior Notes at a rate of 5.125% per annum. Interest on the 2017 Senior Notes is payable semi-annually on March 15 and September 15 of each year, commencing on September 15, 2017. The 2017 Senior Notes will mature on March 15, 2027.

At any time and from time to time prior to December 15, 2026, the Company may redeem all or part of the 2017 Senior Notes, at a redemption price equal to 100% of their principal amount, plus a “make whole” premium as of the redemption date, and accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date.

At any time on or after December 15, 2026, the Company may redeem on one or more occasions all or part of the 2017 Senior Notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

The indenture pursuant to which the 2017 Senior Notes were issued contains customary events of default, including, among other things, payment default, exchange default, failure to provide notices thereunder and provisions related to bankruptcy events. The indenture also contains customary negative covenants.

The Company was in compliance with the covenants relating to the 2017 Senior Notes as of June 30, 2020.

URS Senior Notes

In connection with the URS acquisition, the Company assumed the URS 3.85% Senior Notes due 2017 (2017 URS Senior Notes) and the URS 5.00% Senior Notes due 2022 (2022 URS Senior Notes), totaling $1.0 billion (URS Senior Notes). The URS acquisition triggered change in control provisions in the URS Senior Notes that allowed the holders of the URS Senior Notes to redeem their URS Senior Notes at a cash price equal to 101% of the principal amount and, accordingly, the Company redeemed $572.3 million of the URS Senior Notes on October 24, 2014. The remaining 2017 URS Senior Notes matured and were fully redeemed on April 3, 2017 for $179.2 million using proceeds from a $185 million delayed draw term loan A facility tranche under the Credit Agreement. The 2022 URS Senior Notes are general unsecured senior obligations of AECOM Global II, LLC (as successor in interest to URS) and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint-and-several basis by certain former URS domestic subsidiary guarantors.

Table of Contents

As of June 30, 2020, the estimated fair value of the 2022 URS Senior Notes was approximately $251.9 million. The carrying value of the 2022 URS Senior Notes on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2020 was $248.2 million. The fair value of the 2022 URS Senior Notes as of June 30, 2020 was derived by taking the mid-point of the trading prices from an observable market input (Level 2) in the secondary bond market and multiplying it by the outstanding balance of the 2022 URS Senior Notes.

As of June 30, 2020, the Company was in compliance with the covenants relating to the 2022 URS Senior Notes.

Other Debt and Other Items

Other debt consists primarily of obligations under capital leases and loans, and unsecured credit facilities. The Company's unsecured credit facilities are primarily used for standby letters of credit issued in connection with general and professional liability insurance programs and for contract performance guarantees. At June 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019, these outstanding standby letters of credit totaled $411.1 million and $470.9 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2020, the Company had $473.5 million available under these unsecured credit facilities.

Effective Interest Rate

The Company’s average effective interest rate on its total debt, including the effects of the interest rate swap agreements, during the nine months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 was 5.2% and 5.1%, respectively.

Interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations included amortization of deferred debt issuance costs for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2020 of $1.3 million and $3.8 million, respectively, and for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2019 of $1.3 million and $3.8 million, respectively.

8. Derivative Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements

The Company uses interest rate derivative contracts to hedge interest rate exposures on the Company’s variable rate debt. The Company enters into foreign currency derivative contracts with financial institutions to reduce the risk that its cash flows and earnings will be adversely affected by foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The Company’s hedging program is not designated for trading or speculative purposes.

The Company recognizes derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The Company records changes in the fair value (i.e., gains or losses) of the derivatives that have been designated as accounting hedges in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations as cost of revenue, interest expense or to accumulated other comprehensive loss in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

Cash Flow Hedges

The Company uses interest rate swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges to fix the variable interest rates on portions of the Company’s debt. The Company initially reports any gain on the effective portion of a cash flow hedge as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. Depending on the type of cash flow hedge, the gain is subsequently reclassified to interest expense when the interest expense on the variable rate debt is recognized. If the hedged transaction becomes probable of not occurring, any gain or loss related to interest rate swap agreements would be recognized in other income.

The notional principal in U.S. dollar (USD), Canadian dollar (CAD), and Australian dollar (AUD), fixed rates and related expiration dates of the Company’s outstanding interest rate swap agreements were as follows:


	June 30, 2020
Notional Amount	Notional Amount	Fixed	Expiration
Currency	(in millions)	Rate	Date
USD	200.0	2.60%	February 2023

Table of Contents


	September 30, 2019
Notional Amount	Notional Amount	Fixed	Expiration
Currency	(in millions)	Rate	Date
AUD	200.0	2.19%	February 2021
CAD	400.0	2.49%	September 2022
USD	200.0	2.60%	February 2023

Other Foreign Currency Forward Contracts

The Company uses foreign currency forward contracts which are not designated as accounting hedges to hedge intercompany transactions and other monetary assets or liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of a subsidiary. Gains and losses on these contracts were not material for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company’s non-pension financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair values relate to derivative instruments and were not material at June 30, 2020 or September 30, 2019.

See Note 14 for accumulated balances and reporting period activities of derivatives related to reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019. Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss from the Company’s foreign currency options were immaterial for all periods presented. Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into income from the foreign currency options were immaterial for all periods presented. Additionally, there were no material losses recognized in income due to amounts excluded from effectiveness testing from the Company’s interest rate swap agreements.

9. Share-based Payments

The fair value of the Company’s employee stock option awards is estimated on the date of grant. The expected term of awards granted represents the period of time the awards are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury bond rates with maturities equal to the expected term of the stock option on the grant date. The Company uses historical data as a basis to estimate the probability of forfeitures.

Stock option activity for the nine months ended June 30 was as follows:


	2020			2019
	Shares of stock	Weighted average		Shares of stock	Weighted average
	under options	exercise price		under options	exercise price
	(in millions)			(in millions)
Outstanding at September 30, prior year	0.1	$	31.62	0.6	$	31.62
Options granted	—		—	—		—
Options exercised	—		—	—		—
Options forfeited or expired	—		—	(0.5)		31.62
Outstanding at June 30	0.1		31.62	0.1		31.62

Vested and expected to vest in the future as of June 30	0.1	$	31.62	0.1	$	31.62

The Company grants stock units to employees under its Performance Earnings Program (PEP), whereby units are earned and issued dependent upon meeting established cumulative performance objectives and vest over a three-year service period. Additionally, the Company issues restricted stock units to employees which are earned based on service conditions. The grant date fair value of PEP awards and restricted stock unit awards is that day’s closing market price of the Company’s common stock. The weighted average grant date fair value of PEP awards was $42.99 and $27.53 during the nine months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The weighted average grant date fair value of restricted stock unit awards was $42.25 and $27.68 during the nine months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Total

Table of Contents

compensation expense related to these share-based payments including stock options was $37.0 million and $47.4 million during the nine months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Unrecognized compensation expense related to total share-based payments outstanding as of June 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019 was $55.2 million and $74.6 million, respectively, to be recognized on a straight-line basis over the awards’ respective vesting periods which are generally three years.

10. Income Taxes

The Company's effective tax rate was 14.2% and (2.0)% for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The most significant items contributing to the difference between the statutory U.S. federal corporate tax rate of 21.0% and the Company's effective tax rate for the nine-month period ended June 30, 2020 were a tax benefit of $25.4 million related to the release of a valuation allowance on net operating losses and a benefit of $22.9 million related to income tax credits and incentives, partially offset by tax expense of $21.7 million related to nondeductible costs and tax expense of $9.0 million related to state income tax. All of these items, except for the valuation allowance release, are expected to have a continuing impact on the effective tax rate for the remainder of the fiscal year.

The most significant items contributing to the difference between the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 21.0% and the Company’s effective tax rate for the nine-month period ended June 30, 2019 were a $38.1 million benefit related to the release of a valuation allowance on foreign tax credits and a $18.2 million benefit related to income tax credits and incentives, partially offset by tax expense of $12.1 million related to nondeductible costs.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2020, the Company approved a tax planning strategy and began restructuring certain operations in Canada which resulted in the release of a valuation allowance related to net operating losses in the amount of $25.4 million. The Company is now forecasting the utilization of the net operating losses within the foreseeable future. The new positive evidence was evaluated against any negative evidence to determine the valuation allowance was no longer needed.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2019, a valuation allowance in the amount of $38.1 million related to foreign tax credits was released due to sufficient positive evidence obtained during the quarter. The positive evidence included the issuance of regulations during the quarter related to The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (Tax Act) and forecasting the utilization of the foreign tax credits within the foreseeable future. The Company evaluated the new positive evidence against any negative evidence to determine the valuation allowance was no longer needed.

In March 2020, the U.S. federal government enacted the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act). The Company did not recognize any significant benefits to the income tax provision as a result of the CARES Act.

As a result of internal restructuring and the sale of the Management Services business during the second quarter of fiscal 2020, the Company recorded $62.3 million of tax expense in the second quarter of fiscal 2020 in net income from discontinued operations which included a $52.0 million reduction of tax attributes to related goodwill and intangibles and the current U.S. federal and state tax impacts of the sale.

The Company is utilizing the annual effective tax rate method under ASC 740 to compute its interim tax provision. The Company’s effective tax rate fluctuates from quarter to quarter due to various factors including the change in the mix of global income and expenses, outcomes of administrative audits, changes in the assessment of valuation allowances due to management’s consideration of new positive or negative evidence during the quarter, and changes in enacted tax laws. Many international legislative and regulatory bodies have proposed legislation that could significantly impact how our international business activities are taxed. These proposed changes could have a material impact on the Company’s income tax expense and deferred tax balances.

The Company is currently under tax audit in several jurisdictions including the U.S. and believes the outcomes which are reasonably possible within the next twelve months, including lapses in statutes of limitations, could result in future adjustments, but will not result in a material change in the liability for uncertain tax positions.

Table of Contents

Generally, the Company does not provide for U.S. taxes or foreign withholding taxes on gross book-tax differences in its non-U.S. subsidiaries because such basis differences of approximately $1.7 billion are able to and intended to be reinvested indefinitely. If these basis differences were distributed, foreign tax credits could become available under current law to partially or fully reduce the resulting U.S. income tax liability. There may also be additional U.S. or foreign income tax liability upon repatriation, although the calculation of such additional taxes is not practicable.

11. Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share (EPS) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income attributable to AECOM by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income attributable to AECOM by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and potential common shares for the period. The Company includes as potential common shares the weighted average dilutive effects of equity awards using the treasury stock method. For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, equity awards excluded from the calculation of potential common shares were not significant .

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of the denominators for basic and diluted earnings per share:


	Three Months Ended		Nine Months Ended
	June 30,	June 30,	June 30,	June 30,
	2020	2019	2020	2019

	(in millions)
Denominator for basic earnings per share	160.1	157.4	158.7	156.8
Potential common shares	1.7	2.4	2.4	2.5
Denominator for diluted earnings per share	161.8	159.8	161.1	159.3

12. Leases

On October 1, 2019, the Company adopted FASB ASC 842 on a modified retrospective basis, which amended the accounting standards for leases. Accordingly, the Company applied the new guidance as of the date of adoption with a cumulative-effect adjustment recorded through equity. Prior periods have not been restated as a result of the adoption. Retained earnings decreased $87.8 million due to the adoption, primarily from impairment of the right-of-use assets associated with office building leases. Consistent with its restructuring plan to improve profitability in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019, the Company evaluated its real estate portfolio to better align with the ongoing business. The Company identified leased assets that were not recoverable, and recorded an adjustment to retained earnings upon adoption reflecting the impairment of those long-lived leased assets. Fair value of the right-of-use assets was determined primarily using Level 3 inputs, such as discounted cash flows.

The Company also applied transition elections that allow it to avoid reassessment of whether expired or expiring leases are or contain leases, lease classification, and initial direct costs. Adoption of the new lease guidance did not significantly change the Company’s accounting for finance leases, which were previously referred to as capital leases.

The Company and its subsidiaries are lessees in non-cancelable leasing agreements for office buildings and equipment. Substantially all of the Company’s office building leases are operating leases, and its equipment leases are both operating and finance leases. The Company groups lease and non-lease components for its equipment leases into a single lease component but separates lease and non-lease components for its office building leases.

The Company recognizes a right-of-use asset and lease liability for its operating leases at the commencement date equal to the present value of the contractual minimum lease payments over the lease term. The present value is calculated using the rate implicit in the lease, if known, or the Company’s incremental secured borrowing rate. The discount rate used for operating leases is primarily determined based on an analysis the Company’s incremental secured borrowing rate, while the discount rate used for finance leases is primarily determined by the rate specified in the lease.

Table of Contents

The related lease payments are expensed on a straight-line basis over the lease term, including, as applicable, any free-rent period during which the Company has the right to use the asset. For leases with renewal options where the renewal is reasonably assured, the lease term, including the renewal period, is used to determine the appropriate lease classification and to compute periodic rental expense. Leases with initial terms shorter than 12 months are not recognized on the balance sheet, and lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis.

The components of lease expenses are as follows:


	Three Months Ended		Nine Months Ended
	June 30, 2020		June 30, 2020

	(in millions)
Operating lease cost	$	49.3	$	144.7
Finance lease cost:
Amortization of right-of-use assets		4.2		13.9
Interest on lease liabilities		0.4		1.4
Variable lease cost		8.8		27.1
Short-term lease cost		6.7		12.5
Total lease cost	$	69.4	$	199.6

Additional balance sheet information related to leases is as follows:


(in millions except as noted)	Balance Sheet Classification	June 30, 2020
Assets:
Operating lease assets	Operating lease right-of-use assets	$	645.4
Finance lease assets	Property and equipment – net		24.7
Total lease assets		$	670.1

Liabilities:
Current:
Operating lease liabilities	Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	$	167.0
Finance lease liabilities	Current portion of long-term debt		8.4
Total current lease liabilities			175.4
Non-current:
Operating lease liabilities	Operating lease liabilities, noncurrent		737.4
Finance lease liabilities	Long-term debt		18.7
Total non-current lease liabilities		$	756.1


	June 30, 2020
Weighted average remaining lease term (in years):
Operating leases	7.4
Finance leases	3.4
Weighted average discount rates:
Operating leases	4.6	%
Finance leases	4.4	%

Table of Contents

Additional cash flow information related to leases is as follows:


	Nine months Ended
	June 30, 2020
	(in millions)
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases	$	168.3
Operating cash flows from finance leases		1.3
Financing cash flows from finance leases		11.9
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating leases		90.8
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new finance leases		17.5

Total remaining lease payments under both the Company’s operating and finance leases are as follows:


	Operating Leases		Finance Leases

Fiscal Year	(in millions)
2020 (three months remaining)	$	57.3	$	3.4
2021		201.5		8.4
2022		167.3		7.3
2023		131.7		5.4
2024		105.7		3.4
Thereafter		410.0		1.2
Total lease payments	$	1,073.5	$	29.1
Less: Amounts representing interest	$	(169.1)	$	(2.0)
Total lease liabilities	$	904.4	$	27.1

13. Other Financial Information

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following:


	June 30,		September 30,
	2020		2019

	(in millions)
Accrued salaries and benefits	$	643.0	$	681.5
Accrued contract costs		1,041.2		927.1
Other accrued expenses		487.2		269.7
	$	2,171.4	$	1,878.3

Accrued contract costs above include balances related to professional liability accruals of $560.7 million and $536.6 million as of June 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019, respectively. The remaining accrued contract costs primarily relate to costs for services provided by subcontractors and other non-employees. Liabilities recorded related to accrued contract losses were not material as of June 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019. The Company did not have material revisions to estimates for contracts where revenue is recognized using the percentage-of-completion method during the nine months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019. In the first quarter of fiscal 2019, the Company commenced a restructuring plan to improve profitability. The Company expects to incur restructuring costs of $160 million to $190 million in fiscal year 2020 primarily related to costs associated with the sale of the Management Services business and expected exit of self-perform at-risk construction in the civil infrastructure, power, and oil and gas businesses. During the first nine months of fiscal 2020, the Company incurred restructuring expenses of $96.4 million, including personnel and other costs of $83.5 million and real estate costs of $12.9 million, of which $33.0 million was accrued and unpaid at June 30, 2020. During the first nine months of fiscal 2019, the Company incurred restructuring expenses of $79.2 million, including personnel and other costs of $57.1 million and real estate costs of $22.1 million.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2020, the Company applied for subsidies in accordance with various government legislations. The Company recognized $12.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2020 as a reduction to cost of revenues as the expected amount of the net subsidy.

Table of Contents

14. Reclassifications out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The accumulated balances and reporting period activities for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 related to reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss are summarized as follows (in millions):


			Foreign				Accumulated
	Pension		Currency		Gain/(Loss) on		Other
	Related		Translation		Derivative		Comprehensive
	Adjustments		Adjustments		Instruments		Loss
Balances at March 31, 2020	$	(280.0)	$	(592.1)	$	(9.5)	$	(881.6)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification		1.7		71.4		(0.8)		72.3
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss		2.9		—		0.8		3.7
Balances at June 30, 2020	$	(275.4)	$	(520.7)	$	(9.5)	$	(805.6)


			Foreign				Accumulated
	Pension		Currency		Gain/(Loss) on		Other
	Related		Translation		Derivative		Comprehensive
	Adjustments		Adjustments		Instruments		Loss
Balances at March 31, 2019	$	(200.4)	$	(501.5)	$	(9.1)	$	(711.0)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification		1.0		(6.2)		(4.7)		(9.9)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss		1.4		—		1.1		2.5
Balances at June 30, 2019	$	(198.0)	$	(507.7)	$	(12.7)	$	(718.4)


			Foreign				Accumulated
	Pension		Currency		Gain/(Loss) on		Other
	Related		Translation		Derivative		Comprehensive
	Adjustments		Adjustments		Instruments		Loss
Balances at September 30, 2019	$	(302.7)	$	(548.7)	$	(12.8)	$	(864.2)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassification		(2.0)		28.0		(5.3)		20.7
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss		29.3		—		8.6		37.9
Balances at June 30, 2020	$	(275.4)	$	(520.7)	$	(9.5)	$	(805.6)


			Foreign				Accumulated
	Pension		Currency		Gain/(Loss) on		Other
	Related		Translation		Derivative		Comprehensive
	Adjustments		Adjustments		Instruments		Loss
Balances at September 30, 2018	$	(202.3)	$	(502.2)	$	1.2	$	(703.3)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassification		(0.2)		(5.5)		(16.2)		(21.9)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss		4.5		—		2.3		6.8
Balances at June 30, 2019	$	(198.0)	$	(507.7)	$	(12.7)	$	(718.4)

15. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company records amounts representing its probable estimated liabilities relating to claims, guarantees, litigation, audits and investigations. The Company relies in part on qualified actuaries to assist it in determining the level of reserves to establish for insurance-related claims that are known and have been asserted against it, and for insurance-related claims that are believed to have been incurred based on actuarial analysis, but have not yet been reported to the Company’s claims administrators as of the respective balance sheet dates. The Company includes any adjustments to

Table of Contents

such insurance reserves in its consolidated results of operations. The Company’s reasonably possible loss disclosures are presented on a gross basis prior to the consideration of insurance recoveries. The Company does not record gain contingencies until they are realized. In the ordinary course of business, the Company may not be aware that it or its affiliates are under investigation and may not be aware of whether or not a known investigation has been concluded.

In the ordinary course of business, the Company may enter into various arrangements providing financial or performance assurance to clients, lenders, or partners. Such arrangements include standby letters of credit, surety bonds, and corporate guarantees to support the creditworthiness or the project execution commitments of its affiliates, partnerships and joint ventures. Performance arrangements typically have various expiration dates ranging from the completion of the project contract and extending beyond contract completion in some circumstances such as for warranties. The Company may also guarantee that a project, when complete, will achieve specified performance standards. If the project subsequently fails to meet guaranteed performance standards, the Company may incur additional costs, pay liquidated damages or be held responsible for the costs incurred by the client to achieve the required performance standards. The potential payment amount of an outstanding performance arrangement is typically the remaining cost of work to be performed by or on behalf of third parties. Generally, under joint venture arrangements, if a partner is financially unable to complete its share of the contract, the other partner(s) may be required to complete those activities.

At June 30, 2020, the Company was contingently liable in the amount of approximately $432.3 million in issued standby letters of credit and $5.2 billion in issued surety bonds primarily to support project execution.

In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into various agreements providing financial or performance assurances to clients on behalf of certain unconsolidated partnerships, joint ventures and other jointly executed contracts. These agreements are entered into primarily to support the project execution commitments of these entities.

The Company’s registered investment adviser jointly manages and sponsors the AECOM-Canyon Equity Fund, L.P. (the “Fund”), in which the Company indirectly holds an equity interest and has an ongoing capital commitment to fund investments. At June 30, 2020, the Company has capital commitments of approximately $22.5 million to the Fund over the next 8 years.

In addition, in connection with the investment activities of AECOM Capital, the Company provides guarantees of contractual obligations, including guarantees for completion of projects, repayment of debt, environmental indemnity obligations and other lender required guarantees.

Department of Energy Deactivation, Demolition, and Removal Project

AECOM Energy and Construction, Inc, an Ohio corporation, a former affiliate of the Company (“Former Affiliate”) executed a cost-reimbursable task order with the Department of Energy (DOE) in 2007 to provide deactivation, demolition and removal services at a New York State project site that, during 2010, experienced contamination and performance issues. In February 2011, the Former Affiliate and the DOE executed a Task Order Modification that changed some cost-reimbursable contract provisions to at-risk. The Task Order Modification, including subsequent amendments, required the DOE to pay all project costs up to $106 million, required the Former Affiliate and the DOE to equally share in all project costs incurred from $106 million to $146 million, and required the Former Affiliate to pay all project costs exceeding $146 million.

Due to unanticipated requirements and permitting delays by federal and state agencies, as well as delays and related ground stabilization activities caused by Hurricane Irene in 2011, the Former Affiliate was required to perform work outside the scope of the Task Order Modification. In December 2014, the Former Affiliate submitted an initial set of claims against the DOE pursuant to the Contracts Disputes Acts seeking recovery of $103 million, including additional fees on changed work scope (the “2014 Claims”). On December 6, 2019, the Former Affiliate submitted a second set of claims against the DOE seeking recovery of an additional $60.4 million, including additional project costs and delays outside the scope of the contract as a result of differing site and ground conditions (the “2019 Claims”). The Former Affiliate also submitted three alternative breach of contract claims to the 2014 and 2019 Claims that may entitle

Table of Contents

the Former Affiliate to recovery of $148.5 million to $329.4 million. On December 30, 2019, the DOE denied the Former Affiliate’s 2014 Claims. The Company intends to appeal such decision. Deconstruction, decommissioning and site restoration activities are complete.

On January 31, 2020, the Company completed the sale of its Management Services business to the Purchaser including the Former Affiliate who worked on the DOE project. The Company and the Purchaser agreed that all future DOE project claim recoveries and costs will be split 10% to the Purchaser and 90% to the Company with the Company retaining control of all future strategic legal decisions.

The Company intends to vigorously pursue all claimed amounts but can provide no certainty that the Company will recover 2014 and 2019 Claims submitted against the DOE, or any additional incurred claims or costs, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations.

New York Department of Environmental Conservation

In September 2017, AECOM USA, Inc. was advised by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) of allegations that it committed environmental permit violations pursuant to the New York Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) associated with AECOM USA, Inc.’s oversight of a stream restoration project for Schoharie County which could result in substantial penalties if calculated under the ECL’s maximum civil penalty provisions. AECOM USA, Inc. disputes this claim and intends to continue to defend this matter vigorously; however, AECOM USA, Inc. cannot provide assurances that it will be successful in these efforts. The potential range of loss in excess of any current accrual cannot be reasonably estimated at this time primarily because the matter involves complex and unique environmental and regulatory issues; the project site involves the oversight and involvement of various local, state and federal government agencies; there is substantial uncertainty regarding any alleged damages; and the matter is in its preliminary stages.

Refinery Turnaround Project

A Former Affiliate of the Company entered into an agreement to perform turnaround maintenance services during a planned shutdown at a refinery in Montana in December 2017. The turnaround project was completed in February 2019. Due to circumstances outside of the Company's Former Affiliate’s control, including client directed changes and delays and the refinery’s condition, the Company's Former Affiliate performed additional work outside of the original contract over $90 million and is entitled to payment from the refinery owner of approximately $144 million. In March 2019, the refinery owner sent a letter to the Company’s Former Affiliate alleging it incurred approximately $79 million in damages due to the Company’s Former Affiliate’s project performance. In April 2019, the Company’s Former Affiliate filed and perfected a $132 million construction lien against the refinery owner for unpaid labor and materials costs. In August 2019, following a subcontractor complaint filed in the Thirteen Judicial District Court of Montana asserting claims against the refinery owner and the Company’s Former Affiliate, the refinery owner crossclaimed against the Company’s Former Affiliate and the subcontractor. In October 2019, following the subcontractor’s dismissal of its claims, the Company’s Former Affiliate removed the matter to federal court and cross claimed against the refinery owner. In December 2019, the refinery owner claimed $93.0 million in damages and offsets against the Company’s Former Affiliate.

On January 31, 2020, the Company completed the sale of its Management Services business to the Purchaser including the Former Affiliate, however, the Refinery Turnaround project, including related claims and liabilities, remained as part of the Company's self-perform at-risk construction business which is classified within discontinued operations.

The Company intends to vigorously prosecute and defend this matter; however, the Company cannot provide assurance that the Company will be successful in these efforts. The resolution of this matter and any potential range of loss cannot be reasonably determined or estimated at this time, primarily because the matter raises complex legal issues that Company is continuing to assess.

Table of Contents

16. Reportable Segments

During the first quarter of fiscal 2020, the Company reorganized its operating and reporting structure to better align with its ongoing professional services business. This reorganization better reflects the continuing operations of the Company after the sale of its former Management Services reportable segment and planned disposal of its self-perform at-risk construction businesses discussed in Note 3. The businesses that comprised the Company’s former Management Services reportable segment and the civil infrastructure, power and oil and gas construction businesses in the former Construction Services reportable segment were classified as discontinued operations. The former Design and Consulting Services reportable segment and construction management business in the former Construction Services reportable segment were reformed around geographic regions. The Americas segment provides planning, consulting, architectural and engineering design services, and construction management services to commercial and government clients in the United States, Canada, and Latin America, while the International segment provides similar professional services to commercial and government clients in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and the Asia-Pacific regions.

The Company’s AECOM Capital (ACAP) segment primarily invests in and develops real estate projects. These reportable segments are organized by the differing specialized needs of the respective clients, and how the Company manages its business. The Company has aggregated various operating segments into its reportable segments based on their similar characteristics, including similar long term financial performance, the nature of services provided, internal processes for delivering those services, and types of customers. The change in reportable segments was applied to all periods presented.

Table of Contents

The following tables set forth summarized financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments:


							AECOM
Reportable Segments:	Americas			International			Capital		Corporate		Total

	(in millions)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2020:
Revenue	$	2,471.6		$	717.9		$	0.2	$	—	$	3,189.7
Gross profit		155.3			29.6			0.2		—		185.1
Equity in earnings of joint ventures		5.6			2.7			0.3		—		8.6
General and administrative expenses		—			—			(1.1)		(53.4)		(54.5)
Restructuring costs		—			—			—		(20.3)		(20.3)
Operating income (loss)		160.9			32.3			(0.6)		(73.7)		118.9
Gross profit as a % of revenue		6.3	%		4.1	%						5.8	%

Three Months Ended June 30, 2019:
Revenue	$	2,563.8		$	794.8		$	1.4	$	—	$	3,360.0
Gross profit		123.0			29.4			1.4		—		153.8
Equity in earnings of joint ventures		4.6			3.8			0.8		—		9.2
General and administrative expenses		—			—			(1.5)		(36.0)		(37.5)
Operating income (loss)		127.6			33.2			0.7		(36.0)		125.5
Gross profit as a % of revenue		4.8	%		3.7	%						4.6	%

Nine Months Ended June 30, 2020:
Revenue	$	7,399.2		$	2,270.6		$	1.2	$	—	$	9,671.0
Gross profit		430.3			88.2			1.2		—		519.7
Equity in earnings of joint ventures		17.3			8.7			6.0		—		32.0
General and administrative expenses		—			—			(5.3)		(133.9)		(139.2)
Restructuring costs		—			—			—		(96.4)		(96.4)
Operating income (loss)		447.6			96.9			1.9		(230.3)		316.1
Gross profit as a % of revenue		5.8	%		3.9	%						5.4	%

Nine Months Ended June 30, 2019:
Revenue	$	7,700.7		$	2,421.4		$	6.9	$	—	$	10,129.0
Gross profit		356.9			58.3			6.9		—		422.1
Equity in earnings of joint ventures		12.7			11.7			8.0		—		32.4
General and administrative expenses		—			—			(4.9)		(105.9)		(110.8)
Restructuring costs		—			—			—		(79.2)		(79.2)
Operating income (loss)		369.6			70.0			10.0		(185.1)		264.5
Gross profit as a % of revenue		4.6	%		2.4	%						4.2	%


Reportable Segments:
Total assets
June 30,2020	$	7,801.9	$	2,396.3	$	193.5	$	1,504.9
September 30, 2019		7,437.3		2,247.1		197.8		718.4

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that are not limited to historical facts, but reflect the Company’s current beliefs, expectations or intentions regarding future events. These statements include forward-looking statements with respect to the Company, including the Company’s business, operations and strategy, and the engineering and construction industry. Statements that are not historical facts, without limitation, including statements that use terms such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “estimates,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “potential,” “projects,” and “will” and that relate to future impacts caused by the coronavirus and the related economic instability and market volatility, including the reaction of governments to the coronavirus, including any prolonged period of travel, commercial or other similar restrictions, the delay in commencement, or temporary or permanent halting of construction, infrastructure or other projects, requirements that we remove our employees or personnel from the field for their protection, and delays or reductions in planned initiatives by our governmental or commercial clients or potential clients; future revenues, expenditures and business trends; future reduction of our self-perform at-risk construction exposure; future accounting estimates; future contractual performance obligations; future conversions of backlog; future capital allocation priorities including common stock repurchases, future trade receivables, future debt pay downs; future post-retirement expenses; future tax benefits and expenses; future compliance with regulations; future legal claims and insurance coverage; future effectiveness of our disclosure and internal controls over financial reporting; future costs savings; and other future economic and industry conditions, are forward-looking statements. In light of the risks and uncertainties inherent in all forward-looking statements, the inclusion of such statements in this Quarterly Report should not be considered as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives or plans will be achieved. Although management believes that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, these assumptions and the forward-looking statements are subject to various factors, risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, including, but not limited to, our business is cyclical and vulnerable to economic downturns and client spending reductions; government shutdowns; long-term government contracts and subject to uncertainties related to government contract appropriations; governmental agencies may modify, curtail or terminate our contracts; government contracts are subject to audits and adjustments of contractual terms; losses under fixed-price contracts; limited control over operations run through our joint venture entities; liability for misconduct by our employees or consultants; failure to comply with laws or regulations applicable to our business; maintaining adequate surety and financial capacity; high leverage and potential inability to service our debt and guarantees; exposure to Brexit and tariffs; exposure to political and economic risks in different countries; currency exchange rate fluctuations; retaining and recruiting key technical and management personnel; legal claims; inadequate insurance coverage; environmental law compliance and inadequate nuclear indemnification; unexpected adjustments and cancellations related to our backlog; partners and third parties who may fail to satisfy their legal obligations; managing pension costs; AECOM Capital’s real estate development; cybersecurity issues, IT outages and data privacy; risks associated with the benefits and costs of the Management Services transaction, including the risk that the expected benefits of the Management Services transaction or any contingent purchase price will not be realized with the expected time frame, in full or at all; the risk that costs of restructuring transactions and other costs incurred in connection with the Management Services transaction will exceed our estimates or otherwise adversely affect our business or operations; as well as other additional risks and factors discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and any subsequent reports we file with the SEC. Accordingly, actual results could differ materially from those contemplated by any forward-looking statement.

All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements concerning the Company or other matters attributable to the Company or any person acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements above. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only to the date they are made. The Company is under no obligation (and expressly disclaims any such obligation) to update or revise any forward-looking statement that may be made from time to time, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise. Please review “Part II, Item 1A—Risk Factors” in this Quarterly Report for a discussion of the factors, risks and uncertainties that could affect our future results.

Table of Contents

Overview

We are a leading global provider of professional technical and management support services for governments, businesses and organizations throughout the world. We provide planning, consulting, architectural and engineering design, construction management services and investment and development services to commercial and government clients worldwide in major end markets such as transportation, facilities, environmental, energy, water and government markets.

Our business focuses primarily on providing fee-based planning, consulting, architectural and engineering design services and, therefore, our business is labor intensive. We primarily derive income from our ability to generate revenue and collect cash from our clients through the billing of our employees’ time spent on client projects and our ability to manage our costs. AECOM Capital primarily derives its income from real estate development sales and management fees.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2020, we reorganized our operating and reporting structure to better align with our ongoing professional services business. This reorganization better reflected our continuing operations after the sale of our Management Services and planned disposal of our self-perform at-risk construction businesses, including our civil infrastructure, power and oil & gas construction businesses. Our Management Services and self-perform at-risk construction businesses were part of our former Management Services segment and a substantial portion of our former Construction Services segment, respectively. These businesses are classified as discontinued operations in all periods presented.

We report our continuing business through three segments: Americas, International, and AECOM Capital (ACAP). Such segments are organized by the differing specialized needs of the respective clients, and how we manage the business. We have aggregated various operating segments into our reportable segments based on their similar characteristics, including similar long-term financial performance, the nature of services provided, internal processes for delivering those services, and types of customers.

Our Americas segment delivers planning, consulting, architectural and engineering design, and construction management services to commercial and government clients in the United States, Canada, and Latin America in major end markets such as transportation, water, government, facilities, environmental, and energy. Revenue is primarily derived from fees from services we provide.

Our International segment delivers planning, consulting, architectural and engineering design services to commercial and government clients in Europe, the Middle East, Africa and the Asia-Pacific regions in major end markets such as transportation, water, government, facilities, environment, and energy.

Our ACAP segment primarily invests in and develops real estate projects. ACAP typically partners with investors and experienced developers as co-general partners. ACAP may, but is not required to, enter into contracts with our other AECOM affiliates to provide design, engineering, construction management, development and operations and maintenance services for ACAP funded projects.

Our revenue is dependent on our ability to attract and retain qualified and productive employees, identify business opportunities, integrate and maximize the value of our recent acquisitions, allocate our labor resources to profitable and high growth markets, secure new contracts and renew existing client agreements. Demand for our services is cyclical and may be vulnerable to sudden economic downturns and reductions in government and private industry spending, which may result in clients delaying, curtailing or canceling proposed and existing projects. Moreover, as a professional services company, maintaining the high quality of the work generated by our employees is integral to our revenue generation and profitability.

Our costs consist primarily of the compensation we pay to our employees, including salaries, fringe benefits, the costs of hiring subcontractors, other project-related expenses and sales, general and administrative costs.The U.S. federal government has proposed significant legislative and executive infrastructure initiatives that, if enacted, could have a positive impact to our infrastructure business.

Table of Contents

As part of our capital allocation policy, we drew $248.5 million on our secured delayed draw term loan facility on July 30, 2020 for the purpose of redeeming all of the 2022 URS Senior Notes . We have $760 million of remaining stock repurchase capacity under the existing board authorization, and we intend to deploy future available cash towards additional debt reduction and stock repurchases consistent with our capital allocation policy.

We expect to exit the self-perform at-risk construction and non-core oil and gas markets. We are evaluating our geographic exposure as part of our ongoing plan to exit more than 30 countries, subject to applicable laws, to improve profitability and reduce our risk profile.

We expect to incur restructuring costs of $160 to $190 million in fiscal year 2020 primarily related to costs associated with the sale of the Management Services business and expected exit of at-risk, self-perform construction in the civil infrastructure, power, and oil and gas businesses. Total cash costs for the restructuring are expected to be between $185 and $205 million.

We cannot determine if future climate change and greenhouse gas laws and policies, such as the United Nations’ COP-21 Paris Agreement, will have a material impact on our business or our clients’ business; however, we expect future environmental laws and policies could negatively impact demand for our services related to fossil fuel projects and positively impact demand for our services related to environmental, infrastructure, nuclear and alternative energy projects.

Coronavirus Impacts

The impact of the coronavirus pandemic and measures to prevent its spread are affecting our businesses in a number of ways:

●

We have restricted non-essential business travel, required some employees to work remotely where possible, reduced salaries or furloughed employees, reduced non-essential spending and limited physical interactions with our clients.

●

Non-essential construction and work on other client projects has been temporarily halted in certain jurisdictions.

●

Some contractual agreements are unable to be performed preventing us from making or receiving payments.

●

The coronavirus has made accessing the capital markets and engaging in business and client development more difficult.

●

The coronavirus has made estimating the future performance of our business and mitigating the adverse financial impact of these developments on our business operations more difficult.

●

The coronavirus and accompanying economic effects are expected to reduce demand for our services and impact client spending in certain circumstances; however, the uncertain nature of the coronavirus and its duration make it difficult for us to predict and quantify such impact.

●

State and local budget shortfalls in the U.S. have begun to negatively impact our pipeline of pursuits and the pace of award activity.

●

Certain markets, such as the U.K., Middle East and Southeast Asia, are experiencing project delays that have impacted our performance and results.

●

During the third quarter of fiscal 2020, we benefited from government subsidies of approximately $12 million, which were received under various programs related to retaining employees.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

Three and nine months ended June 30, 2020 compared to the three and nine months ended June 30, 2019

Consolidated Results


	Three Months Ended								Nine months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,		Change				June 30,		June 30,		Change
	2020		2019		$		%		2020		2019		$		%

	(unaudited - in millions)
Revenue	$	3,189.7	$	3,360.0	$	(170.3)	(5.1)	%	$	9,671.0	$	10,129.0	$	(458.0)	(4.5)	%
Cost of revenue		3,004.6		3,206.2		(201.6)	(6.3)			9,151.3		9,706.9		(555.6)	(5.7)
Gross profit		185.1		153.8		31.3	20.3			519.7		422.1		97.6	23.1
Equity in earnings of joint ventures		8.6		9.2		(0.6)	(6.7)			32.0		32.4		(0.4)	(1.3)
General and administrative expenses		(54.5)		(37.5)		(17.0)	45.2			(139.2)		(110.8)		(28.4)	25.5
Restructuring costs		(20.3)		—		(20.3)	0.0			(96.4)		(79.2)		(17.2)	21.8
Income from operations		118.9		125.5		(6.6)	(5.3)			316.1		264.5		51.6	19.5
Other income		3.1		4.3		(1.2)	(28.0)			9.5		11.0		(1.5)	(13.7)
Interest expense		(34.9)		(40.5)		5.6	(13.8)			(112.4)		(121.3)		8.9	(7.3)
Income from continuing operations before taxes		87.1		89.3		(2.2)	(2.5)			213.2		154.2		59.0	38.3
Income tax (benefit) expense for continuing operations		(7.1)		27.2		(34.3)	(126.4)			30.3		(3.1)		33.4	NM
Net income from continuing operations		94.2		62.1		32.1	51.7			182.9		157.3		25.6	16.3
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations		(0.1)		43.3		(43.4)	(100.3)			(112.7)		106.7		(219.4)	(205.7)
Net income		94.1		105.4		(11.3)	(10.7)			70.2		264.0		(193.8)	(73.4)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests from continuing operations		(3.1)		(6.1)		3.0	(48.5)			(12.4)		(17.9)		5.5	(30.7)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests from discontinued operations		(1.7)		(15.6)		13.9	(89.4)			(14.0)		(33.0)		19.0	(57.5)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		(4.8)		(21.7)		16.9	(77.9)			(26.4)		(50.9)		24.5	(48.1)
Net income attributable to AECOM from continuing operations		91.1		56.0		35.1	62.6			170.5		139.4		31.1	22.3
Net (loss) income attributable to AECOM from discontinued operations		(1.8)		27.7		(29.5)	(106.4)			(126.7)		73.7		(200.4)	(271.9)
Net income attributable to AECOM	$	89.3	$	83.7	$	5.6	6.7	%	$	43.8	$	213.1	$	(169.3)	(79.4)	%

Table of Contents

The following table presents the percentage relationship of statement of operations items to revenue:


	Three Months Ended				Nine months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,		June 30,		June 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Revenue	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Cost of revenue	94.2		95.4		94.6		95.8
Gross profit	5.8		4.6		5.4		4.2
Equity in earnings of joint ventures	0.3		0.3		0.3		0.3
General and administrative expenses	(1.8)		(1.2)		(1.4)		(1.1)
Restructuring costs	(0.6)		0.0		(1.0)		(0.8)
Income from operations	3.7		3.7		3.3		2.6
Other income	0.1		0.1		0.1		0.1
Interest expense	(1.1)		(1.1)		(1.2)		(1.2)
Income from continuing operations before taxes	2.7		2.7		2.2		1.5
Income tax (benefit) expense for continuing operations	(0.3)		0.9		0.3		(0.1)
Net income from continuing operations	3.0		1.8		1.9		1.6
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations	0.0		1.3		(1.2)		1.0
Net income	3.0		3.1		0.7		2.6
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests from continuing operations, net of tax	(0.1)		(0.1)		(0.1)		(0.2)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests from discontinued operations, net of tax	0.0		(0.5)		(0.2)		(0.3)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	(0.1)		(0.6)		(0.3)		(0.5)
Net income attributable to AECOM from continuing operations	2.9		1.7		1.8		1.4
Net (loss) income attributable to AECOM from discontinued operations	0.0		0.8		(1.4)		0.7
Net income attributable to AECOM	2.9	%	2.5	%	0.4	%	2.1	%

Revenue

Our revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2020 decreased $170.3 million, or 5.1%, to $3,189.7 million as compared to $3,360.0 million for the corresponding period last year.

Our revenue for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 decreased $458.0 million, or 4.5%, to $9,671.0 million as compared to $10,129.0 million for the corresponding period last year.

The decrease in revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2020 was primarily attributable to decreases in our Americas segment of $92.2 million and in our International segment of $76.9 million, as discussed further below.

The decrease in revenue for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 was primarily attributable to decreases in our Americas segment of $301.5 million and in our International segment of $150.8 million, as discussed further below.

In the course of providing our services, we routinely subcontract for services and incur other direct costs on behalf of our clients. These costs are passed through to clients and, in accordance with industry practice and GAAP, are included in our revenue and cost of revenue. Because subcontractor and other direct costs can change significantly from project to project and period to period, changes in revenue may not be indicative of business trends. Subcontractor and other direct costs for the quarters ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 were $1.7 billion and $1.8 billion, respectively. Subcontractor and other direct costs for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 were $5.1 billion and $5.5 billion, respectively. Subcontractor costs and other direct costs as a percentage of revenue were 53% and 54% during the three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Subcontractor costs and other direct costs as a percentage of revenue were 52% and 54% during the nine months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Table of Contents

Gross Profit

Our gross profit for the three months ended June 30, 2020 increased $31.3 million, or 20.3%, to $185.1 million as compared to $153.8 million for the corresponding period last year. For the three months ended June 30, 2020, gross profit, as a percentage of revenue, increased to 5.8% from 4.6% in the three months ended June 30, 2019.

Our gross profit for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 increased $97.6 million, or 23.1%, to $519.7 million as compared to $422.1 million for the corresponding period last year. For the nine months ended June 30, 2020, gross profit, as a percentage of revenue, increased to 5.4% from 4.2% in the nine months ended June 30, 2019.

Gross profit changes were due to the reasons noted in Americas and International reportable segments below.

Equity in Earnings of Joint Ventures

Our equity in earnings of joint ventures for the three months ended June 30, 2020 was $8.6 million as compared to $9.2 million in the corresponding period last year.

Our equity in earnings of joint ventures for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 was $32.0 million as compared to $32.4 million in the corresponding period last year.

General and Administrative Expenses

Our general and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2020 increased $17.0 million, or 45.2%, to $54.5 million as compared to $37.5 million for the corresponding period last year. For the three months ended June 30, 2020, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of revenue, increased to 1.8% from 1.2% in the three months ended June 30, 2019. The increase was primarily due to the accelerated depreciation of a project management tool in the three month period ending June 30, 2020.

Our general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 increased $28.4 million, or 25.5%, to $139.2 million as compared to $110.8 million for the corresponding period last year. For the nine months ended June 30, 2020, general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of revenue, increased to 1.4% from 1.1% in the three months ended June 30, 2019. The increase was primarily due to the accelerated depreciation of a project management tool in the nine month period ending June 30, 2020.

Restructuring Costs

In the first quarter of fiscal 2019, we commenced a restructuring plan to improve profitability. We expect to incur additional restructuring costs in fiscal 2020 primarily related to costs associated with the sale of the Management Services business and the exit of our self-perform at-risk construction business. During the nine months ended June 30, 2019, we incurred restructuring expenses of $79.2 million, primarily related to personnel and real estate costs. During the nine months ended June 30, 2020, we incurred restructuring expenses of $96.4 million, primarily related to personnel costs, including costs associated with recent executive transitions.

Other Income

Our other income for the three months ended June 30, 2020 decreased to $3.1 million from $4.3 million for the corresponding period last year.

Our other income for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 decreased to $9.5 million from $11.0 million for the corresponding period last year.

Other income is primarily comprised of interest income.

Table of Contents

Interest Expense

Our interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2020 was $34.9 million as compared to $40.5 million for the corresponding period last year.

Our interest expense for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 was $112.4 million as compared to $121.3 million for the corresponding period last year.

Income Tax Benefit / Expense

Our income tax benefit for the three months ended June 30, 2020 was $7.1 million as compared to income tax expense of $27.2 million in the corresponding period last year. The increase in tax benefit for the current period compared to the corresponding period last year is due primarily to a benefit of $25.4 million related to the release of a valuation allowance in the third quarter of fiscal 2020 and a benefit of $5.0 million related to a decrease in the accrual for uncertain tax positions.

Our income tax expense for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 was $30.3 million as compared to an income tax benefit of $3.1 million in the corresponding period last year. The increase in tax expense for the current period compared to the corresponding period last year is due primarily to a $38.1 million benefit recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 related to the release of a valuation allowance on foreign tax credits and the tax impacts of an increase in overall pre-tax income of $59.0 million, partially offset by a $25.4 million tax benefit recorded in the third quarter of fiscal 2020 related to the release of a valuation allowance.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2020, management approved a tax planning strategy and we began restructuring certain operations in Canada which resulted in the release of a valuation allowance related to net operating losses in the amount of $25.4 million. We are now forecasting the utilization of the net operating losses within the foreseeable future. The new positive evidence was evaluated against any negative evidence to determine the valuation allowance was no longer needed.

During the first quarter of fiscal 2019, a valuation allowance in the amount of $38.1 million related to foreign tax credits was released due to sufficient positive evidence obtained during the quarter. The positive evidence included the issuance of regulations related to the Tax Act during the quarter and forecasting the utilization of the foreign tax credits within the foreseeable future.

We regularly integrate and consolidate our business operations and legal entity structure, and such internal initiatives could impact the assessment of uncertain tax positions, indefinite reinvestment assertions and the realizability of deferred tax assets.

Net (Loss) Income From Discontinued Operations

During the first quarter of fiscal 2020, management approved a plan to dispose via sale our Management Services business and our self-perform at-risk construction businesses. As a result of these strategic actions, the Management Services and self-perform at-risk construction businesses were classified as discontinued operations. That classification was applied retrospectively for all periods presented.

Net (loss) income from discontinued operations decreased $43.4 million to $(0.1) million from $43.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Net (loss) income from discontinued operations decreased $219.4 million to $(112.7) million from $106.7 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The decrease in net income from discontinued operations for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2020 was primarily due to goodwill and intangible impairments recorded in our oil and gas business, a decrease in project performance in our power business, and a decrease in project performance in our civil construction business, offset by the gain on disposal of our Management Services business of approximately $161.9 million. Goodwill associated with the oil and gas business was originally

Table of Contents

recognized in the acquisition of the URS Corporation (URS) in October 2014. Weak forecasted market demand for oil and gas services, primarily due to the significant decline in commodity prices for Western Canada Select, resulted in lower fair value than previously measured at our annual impairment test date as of September 30, 2019. Earnings and cash flows from our oil and gas business for the nine-month period ending June 30, 2020 were in line with our expectations, but the volatility in global prices created significant uncertainty for near term profitability.

Net Income Attributable to AECOM

The factors described above resulted in net income attributable to AECOM of $89.3 million and $43.8 million for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2020, respectively, as compared to $83.7 million and $213.1 million for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2019, respectively.

Results of Operations by Reportable Segment:

Americas


	Three Months Ended								Nine months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,		Change				June 30,		June 30,		Change
	2020		2019		$		%		2020		2019		$		%

	(in millions)
Revenue	$	2,471.6	$	2,563.8	$	(92.2)	(3.6)	%	$	7,399.2	$	7,700.7	$	(301.5)	(3.9)	%
Cost of revenue		2,316.3		2,440.8		(124.5)	(5.1)			6,968.9		7,343.8		(374.9)	(5.1)
Gross profit	$	155.3	$	123.0	$	32.3	26.2	%	$	430.3	$	356.9	$	73.4	20.6	%

The following table presents the percentage relationship of statement of operations items to revenue:


	Three Months Ended				Nine months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,		June 30,		June 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Revenue	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Cost of revenue	93.7		95.2		94.2		95.4
Gross profit	6.3	%	4.8	%	5.8	%	4.6	%

Revenue

Revenue for our Americas segment for the three months ended June 30, 2020 decreased $92.2 million, or 3.6%, to $2,471.6 million as compared to $2,563.8 million for the corresponding period last year.

Revenue for our Americas segment for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 decreased $301.5 million, or 3.9%, to $7,399.2 million as compared to $7,700.7 million for the corresponding period last year.

The decrease in revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2020 was primarily attributable to a decrease in the Americas design and consulting services of $100 million, largely due to decreased work performed on a residential housing storm disaster relief program. Additionally, the decrease was due to reduced subcontractor activity for residential high-rise buildings in the city of New York.

The decrease in revenue for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 was primarily attributable to a decrease in the Americas design and consulting services of $200 million, largely due to decreased work performed on a residential housing storm disaster relief program. Additionally, the decrease was due to reduced subcontractor activity for residential high-rise buildings in the city of New York.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for our Americas segment for the three months ended June 30, 2020 increased $32.3 million, or 26.2%, to $155.3 million as compared to $123.0 million for the corresponding period last year. As a percentage of

Table of Contents

revenue, gross profit increased to 6.3% of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2020 from 4.8% in the corresponding period last year.

Gross profit for our Americas segment for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 increased $73.4 million, or 20.6%, to $430.3 million as compared to $356.9 million for the corresponding period last year. As a percentage of revenue, gross profit increased to 5.8% of revenue for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 from 4.6% in the corresponding period last year.

The increase in gross profit and gross profit as a percentage of revenue for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2020 was primarily due to reduced costs resulting from restructuring activities taken in the prior period and strong project execution.

International


	Three Months Ended								Nine months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,		Change				June 30,		June 30,		Change
	2020		2019		$		%		2020		2019		$		%

	(in millions)
Revenue	$	717.9	$	794.8	$	(76.9)	(9.7)	%	$	2,270.6	$	2,421.4	$	(150.8)	(6.2)	%
Cost of revenue		688.3		765.4		(77.1)	(10.1)			2,182.4		2,363.1		(180.7)	(7.6)
Gross profit	$	29.6	$	29.4	$	0.2	0.7	%	$	88.2	$	58.3	$	29.9	51.1	%

The following table presents the percentage relationship of statement of operations items to revenue:


	Three Months Ended				Nine months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,		June 30,		June 30,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Revenue	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Cost of revenue	95.9		96.3		96.1		97.6
Gross profit	4.1	%	3.7	%	3.9	%	2.4	%

Revenue

Revenue for our International segment for the three months ended June 30, 2020 decreased $76.9 million, or 9.7%, to $717.9 million as compared to $794.8 million for the corresponding period last year.

Revenue for our International segment for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 decreased $150.8 million, or 6.2%, to $2,270.6 million as compared to $2,421.4 million for the corresponding period last year.

The decrease in revenues for the three- and nine-month period ended June 30, 2020 is primarily due to declines in the United Kingdom and the Middle East regions due to downtime caused by the impact of the coronavirus pandemic in those regions.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for our International segment for the three months ended June 30, 2020 increased $0.2 million, or 0.7%, to $29.6 million as compared to $29.4 million for the corresponding period last year. As a percentage of revenue, gross profit increased to 4.1% of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2020 from 3.7% in the corresponding period last year.

Gross profit for our International segment for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 increased $29.9 million, or 51.1%, to $88.2 million as compared to $58.3 million for the corresponding period last year. As a percentage of revenue, gross profit increased to 3.9% of revenue for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 from 2.4% in the corresponding period last year.

Table of Contents

AECOM Capital


	Three Months Ended								Nine months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,		Change				June 30,		June 30,		Change
	2020		2019		$		%		2020		2019		$		%

	(in millions)
Revenue	$	0.2	$	1.4	$	(1.2)	(86.5)	%	$	1.2	$	6.9	$	(5.7)	(82.0)	%
Equity in earnings of joint ventures		0.3		0.8		(0.5)	(56.4)			6.0		8.0		(2.0)	(24.8)
General and administrative expenses		(1.1)		(1.5)		0.4	(26.6)			(5.3)		(4.9)		(0.4)	7.6

Seasonality

We experience seasonal trends in our business. The first quarter of our fiscal year (October 1 to December 31) is typically our weakest quarter. The harsher weather conditions impact our ability to complete work in parts of North America and the holiday season schedule affects our productivity during this period. Our revenue is typically higher in the last half of the fiscal year. Many U.S. state governments with fiscal years ending on June 30 tend to accelerate spending during their first quarter, when new funding becomes available. In addition, we find that the U.S. federal government tends to authorize more work during the period preceding the end of our fiscal year, September 30. Further, our construction management revenue typically increases during the high construction season of the summer months. Within the United States, as well as other parts of the world, our business generally benefits from milder weather conditions in our fiscal fourth quarter, which allows for more productivity from our on-site civil services. For these reasons, coupled with the number and significance of client contracts commenced and completed during a period, as well as the time of expenses incurred for corporate initiatives, it is not unusual for us to experience seasonal changes or fluctuations in our quarterly operating results.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flows

Our principal sources of liquidity are cash flows from operations, borrowings under our credit facilities, and access to financial markets. Our principal uses of cash are operating expenses, capital expenditures, working capital requirements, acquisitions, repurchases of common stock, and repayment of debt. We believe our anticipated sources of liquidity including operating cash flows, existing cash and cash equivalents, borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility and our ability to issue debt or equity, if required, will be sufficient to meet our projected cash requirements for at least the next twelve months. We sold our Management Services business on January 31, 2020 for a purchase price of approximately $2.4 billion. The purchase price includes contingent consideration of approximately $120 million attributable to certain claims related to prior work and engagements. We expect to spend approximately $185 to $205 million in restructuring costs in fiscal 2020 associated with the sale of the Management Services business and the exit of our self-perform at-risk construction businesses.

Generally, we do not provide for U.S. taxes or foreign withholding taxes on gross book-tax basis differences in our non-U.S. subsidiaries because such basis differences are able to and intended to be reinvested indefinitely. At June 30, 2020, we have determined that we will continue to indefinitely reinvest the earnings of some foreign subsidiaries and therefore we will continue to account for these undistributed earnings based on our existing accounting under ASC 740 and not accrue additional tax outside of the one-time transition tax required under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that was enacted on December 22, 2017. Determination of the amount of any unrecognized deferred income tax liability on this temporary difference is not practicable because of the complexities of the hypothetical calculation. Based on the available sources of cash flows discussed above, we anticipate we will continue to have the ability to permanently reinvest these remaining amounts.

Table of Contents

At June 30, 2020, cash and cash equivalents, including cash and cash equivalents included in current assets held for sale, were $1,424.4 million, an increase of $344.0 million, or 31.8%, from $1,080.4 million at September 30, 2019. The increase in cash and cash equivalents was primarily attributable to cash provided by the sale of our Management Services business offset by cash used in operating activities, and repayment of borrowings under our credit agreement.

Net cash used in operating activities was $319.7 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2020, compared to $16.1 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2019. The change was primarily attributable to the timing of receipts and payments of working capital, which includes accounts receivable, contract assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and contract liabilities. The sale of trade receivables to financial institutions during the nine months ended June 30, 2020 provided a net unfavorable impact of $193.0 million, primarily due to the sale of our Management Services business in the second quarter of fiscal 2020, as compared to a net favorable impact of $4.0 million during the nine months ended June 30, 2019. We expect to continue to sell trade receivables in the future as long as the terms continue to remain favorable to us.

Net cash provided by investing activities was $2,074.1 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2020, as compared to net cash used of $123.6 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2019. The change was primarily attributable to proceeds received from the sale of our Management Services business. Cash proceeds from the sale of our Management Services business totaled $2.28 billion inclusive of the receipt of $122.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2020 in connection with a favorable net working capital purchase price adjustment.

Net cash used in financing activities was $1,405.5 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 as compared to net cash provided of $46.5 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2019. This change was primarily attributable to repayment of our term loan under our credit agreement. Total borrowings may vary during the period.

AECOM Caribe, a subsidiary of the Company, has incurred payment delays supporting the storm recovery work in the U.S. Virgin Islands. AECOM Caribe signed several contracts with Virgin Islands authorities to provide emergency design, construction and technical services after two Category Five hurricanes devastated the Virgin Islands in 2017, that were dependent on federal funding. AECOM Caribe and its subcontractors have performed over $750 million of work under the Virgin Islands contracts and payment delays have increased working capital by over $150 million from September 30, 2018 to June 30, 2020. We are currently negotiating with the Virgin Island authorities and U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency to modify the contract and accelerate funding for current and future contractual payments; however, we can provide no certainty as to the timing or amount of future payments.

Working Capital

Working capital, or current assets less current liabilities, increased $465.8 million, or 43.4%, to $1,538.7 million at June 30, 2020 from $1,072.9 million at September 30, 2019. Net accounts receivable and contract assets, net of contract liabilities, increased to $3,546.0 million at June 30, 2020 from $3,600.0 million at September 30, 2019.

Days Sales Outstanding (DSO), which includes net accounts receivable and contract assets, net of contract liabilities, was 101 days at June 30, 2020 compared to 94 days at September 30, 2019.

In Note 4, Revenue Recognition, in the notes to our consolidated financial statements, a comparative analysis of the various components of accounts receivable is provided. Except for claims, substantially all contract assets are expected to be billed and collected within twelve months.

Contract assets related to claims are recorded only if it is probable that the claim will result in additional contract revenue and if the amount can be reliably estimated. In such cases, revenue is recorded only to the extent that contract costs relating to the claim have been incurred. Award fees in contract assets are accrued only when there is sufficient information to assess contract performance. On contracts that represent higher than normal risk or technical difficulty, award fees are generally deferred until an award fee letter is received.

Table of Contents

Because our revenue depends to a great extent on billable labor hours, most of our charges are invoiced following the end of the month in which the hours were worked, the majority usually within 15 days. Other direct costs are normally billed along with labor hours. However, as opposed to salary costs, which are generally paid on either a bi-weekly or monthly basis, other direct costs are generally not paid until payment is received (in some cases in the form of advances) from the customers.

Debt

Debt consisted of the following:


	June 30,		September 30,
	2020		2019

	(in millions)
2014 Credit Agreement	$	—	$	1,182.2
2014 Senior Notes		800.0		800.0
2017 Senior Notes		1,000.0		1,000.0
URS Senior Notes		248.2		248.1
Other debt		48.1		122.2
Total debt		2,096.3		3,352.5
Less: Current portion of debt and short-term borrowings		(24.7)		(98.3)
Less: Unamortized debt issuance costs		(23.6)		(36.2)
Long-term debt	$	2,048.0	$	3,218.0

The following table presents, in millions, scheduled maturities of the Company's debt as of June 30, 2020:


Fiscal Year
2020 (three months remaining)	$	14.7
2021		12.1
2022		258.2
2023		6.8
2024		3.3
Thereafter		1,801.2
Total	$	2,096.3

2014 Credit Agreement

We entered into a credit agreement (Credit Agreement) on October 17, 2014, which, as amended to date, consists of (i) a term loan A facility that includes a $510 million (US) term loan A facility with a term expiring on March 13, 2021 and a $500 million Canadian dollar (CAD) term loan A facility and a $250 million Australian dollar (AUD) term loan A facility, each with terms expiring on March 13, 2023; (ii) a $600 million term loan B facility with a term expiring on March 13, 2025; and (iii) a revolving credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of $1.35 billion with a term expiring on March 13, 2023. Some of our subsidiaries (Guarantors) have guaranteed the obligations of the borrowers under the Credit Agreement. The borrowers’ obligations under the Credit Agreement are secured by a lien on substantially all of our assets and the Guarantors’ pursuant to a security and pledge agreement (Security Agreement). The collateral under the Security Agreement is subject to release upon fulfillment of conditions specified in the Credit Agreement and Security Agreement.

The Credit Agreement contains covenants that limit our ability and the ability of some of our subsidiaries to, among other things: (i) create, incur, assume, or suffer to exist liens; (ii) incur or guarantee indebtedness; (iii) pay dividends or repurchase stock; (iv) enter into transactions with affiliates; (v) consummate asset sales, acquisitions or mergers; (vi) enter into various types of burdensome agreements; or (vii) make investments.

On July 1, 2015, the Credit Agreement was amended to revise the definition of “Consolidated EBITDA” to increase the allowance for acquisition and integration expenses related our acquisition of URS.

Table of Contents

On March 31, 2017, the Credit Agreement was amended to (1) expand the ability of restricted subsidiaries to borrow under “Incremental Term Loans;” (2) revise the definition of “Working Capital” as used in “Excess Cash Flow;” (3) revise the definitions for “Consolidated EBITDA” and “Consolidated Funded Indebtedness” to reflect the expected gain and debt repayment of an AECOM Capital disposition, which disposition was completed on April 28, 2017; and (4) amend provisions relating to our ability to undertake internal restructuring steps to accommodate changes in tax laws.

On March 13, 2018, the Credit Agreement was amended to (1) refinance the existing term loan A facility to include a $510 million (US) term loan A facility with a term expiring on March 13, 2021 and a $500 million CAD term loan A facility and a $250 million AUD term loan A facility each with terms expiring on March 13, 2023; (2) issue a new $600 million term loan B facility to institutional investors with a term expiring on March 13, 2025; (3) increase the capacity of our revolving credit facility from $1.05 billion to $1.35 billion and extend its term until March 13, 2023; (4) reduce our interest rate borrowing costs as follows: (a) the term loan B facility, at our election, Base Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus 0.75% or Eurocurrency Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus 1.75%, (b) the (US) term loan A facility, at our election, Base Rate plus 0.50% or Eurocurrency Rate plus 1.50%, and (c) the Canadian (CAD) term loan A facility, the Australian (AUD) term loan A facility, and the revolving credit facility, an initial rate of, at our election, Base Rate plus 0.75% or Eurocurrency Rate plus 1.75%, and after the end of our fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2018, Base Rate loans plus a margin ranging from 0.25% to 1.00% or Eurocurrency Rate plus a margin from 1.25% to 2.00%, based on the Consolidated Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement); (5) revise covenants including increasing the amounts available under the restricted payment negative covenant and revising the Maximum Consolidated Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) to include a 4.5 leverage ratio through September 30, 2019 after which the leverage ratio steps down to 4.0.

On November 13, 2018, the Credit Agreement was amended to revise the definition of “Consolidated EBITDA” to increase corporate restructuring allowances and provide for additional flexibility under the covenants for non-core asset dispositions, among other changes.

On May 1, 2020, the Company entered into Amendment No. 8 to the Credit Agreement which allows for borrowings to be made, until three months after closing, up to an aggregate principal amount of $400,000,000 under a secured delayed draw term loan facility, the proceeds of which are permitted to be used to pay all or a portion of the amounts payable in connection with any tender for or redemption or repayment of the Company’s or its subsidiaries’ existing senior unsecured notes and any associated fees and expenses. The amendment also revised certain terms and covenants in the Credit Agreement, including by, among other things, revising the maximum leverage ratio covenant to 4.00:1.00, subject to increases to 4.50:1.00 for certain specified periods in connection with certain material acquisitions, increasing the potential size of incremental facilities under the Credit Agreement, revising the definition of “Consolidated EBITDA” to provide for additional flexibility in the calculation thereof and adding a Eurocurrency Rate floor of 0.75% to the interest rate under the revolving credit facility.

Table of Contents

On July 30, 2020, we drew $248.5 million on our secured delayed draw term loan facility for the purpose of redeeming all of the 2022 URS Senior Notes.

Under the Credit Agreement, we are subject to a maximum consolidated leverage ratio and minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio at the end of each fiscal quarter. Our Consolidated Leverage Ratio was 2.8 at June 30, 2020. Our Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio was 5.2 at June 30, 2020. As of June 30, 2020, we were in compliance with the covenants of the Credit Agreement.

At June 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019, outstanding standby letters of credit totaled $21.2 million and $22.8 million, respectively, under our revolving credit facilities. As of June 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019, we had $1,328.8 million and $1,327.2 million, respectively, available under our revolving credit facility.

2014 Senior Notes

On October 6, 2014, we completed a private placement offering of $800,000,000 aggregate principal amount of the unsecured 5.750% Senior Notes due 2022 (2022 Notes) and $800,000,000 aggregate principal amount of the unsecured 5.875% Senior Notes due 2024 (the 2024 Notes and, together with the 2022 Notes, the 2014 Senior Notes). On November 2, 2015, we completed an exchange offer to exchange the unregistered 2014 Senior Notes for registered notes, as well as all related guarantees. On March 16, 2018, we redeemed all of the 2022 Notes at a redemption price that was 104.313% of the principal amount outstanding plus accrued and unpaid interest. The March 16, 2018 redemption resulted in a $34.5 million prepayment premium, which was included in interest expense.

On July 21, 2020, we completed a cash tender offer for up to $639 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2024 Notes and the 2017 Senior Notes. We accepted for purchase all of 2024 Notes validly tendered and not validly withdrawn pursuant to the cash tender offer, amounting to $2.7 million aggregate principal amount of the 2024 Notes.We made the cash tender offer at par to satisfy obligations under the indentures governing the 2024 Notes and the 2017 Senior Notes relating to the use of certain cash proceeds from our disposition of the Management Services business, which was completed on January 31, 2020.

At any time prior to July 15, 2024, we may redeem on one or more occasions all or part of the 2024 Notes at a redemption price equal to the sum of (i) 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus (ii) a “make-whole” premium as of the date of the redemption, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. In addition, on or after July 15, 2024, the 2024 Notes may be redeemed at a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption.

We were in compliance with the covenants relating to the 2024 Notes as of June 30, 2020.

2017 Senior Notes

On February 21, 2017, we completed a private placement offering of $1,000,000,000 aggregate principal amount of our unsecured 5.125% Senior Notes due 2027 (the 2017 Senior Notes) and used the proceeds to immediately retire the remaining $127.6 million outstanding on the then existing term loan B facility as well as repay $600 million of the term loan A facility and $250 million of the revolving credit facility under our Credit Agreement. On June 30, 2017, we completed an exchange offer to exchange the unregistered 2017 Senior Notes for registered notes, as well as related guarantees.

Table of Contents

At any time and from time to time prior to December 15, 2026, we may redeem all or part of the 2017 Senior Notes, at a redemption price equal to 100% of their principal amount, plus a “make whole” premium as of the redemption date, and accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date.

At any time on or after December 15, 2026, we may redeem on one or more occasions all or part of the 2017 Senior Notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

We were in compliance with the covenants relating to the 2017 Senior Notes as of June 30, 2020.

URS Senior Notes

In connection with the URS acquisition, we assumed the URS 3.85% Senior Notes due 2017 (2017 URS Senior Notes) and the URS 5.00% Senior Notes due 2022 (2022 URS Senior Notes), totaling $1.0 billion (URS Senior Notes). The URS acquisition triggered change in control provisions in the URS Senior Notes that allowed the holders of the URS Senior Notes to redeem their URS Senior Notes at a cash price equal to 101% of the principal amount and, accordingly, we redeemed $572.3 million of the URS Senior Notes on October 24, 2014. The remaining 2017 URS Senior Notes matured and were fully redeemed on April 3, 2017 for $179.2 million using proceeds from a $185 million delayed draw term loan A facility tranche under the Credit Agreement. The 2022 URS Senior Notes are general unsecured senior obligations of AECOM Global II, LLC (as successor in interest to URS) and are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint-and-several basis by certain former URS domestic subsidiary guarantors.

As of June 30, 2020, the estimated fair value of the 2022 URS Senior Notes was approximately $251.9 million. The carrying value of the 2022 URS Senior Notes on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2020 was $248.2 million. The fair value of the 2022 URS Senior Notes as of June 30, 2020 was derived by taking the mid-point of the trading prices from an observable market input (Level 2) in the secondary bond market and multiplying it by the outstanding balance of the 2022 URS Senior Notes.

As of June 30, 2020, we were in compliance with the covenants relating to the 2022 URS Senior Notes.

Other Debt and Other Items

Other debt consists primarily of obligations under capital leases and loans, and unsecured credit facilities. Our unsecured credit facilities are primarily used for standby letters of credit issued in connection with general and professional liability insurance programs and for contract performance guarantees. At June 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019, these outstanding standby letters of credit totaled $411.1 million and $470.9 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2020, we had $473.5 million available under these unsecured credit facilities.

Effective Interest Rate

Our average effective interest rate on our total debt, including the effects of the interest rate swap agreements, during the nine months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 was 5.2% and 5.1%, respectively.

Table of Contents

Other Commitments

We enter into various joint venture arrangements to provide architectural, engineering, program management, construction management and operations and maintenance services. The ownership percentage of these joint ventures is typically representative of the work to be performed or the amount of risk assumed by each joint venture partner. Some of these joint ventures are considered variable interest. We have consolidated all joint ventures for which we have control. For all others, our portion of the earnings is recorded in equity in earnings of joint ventures. See Note 5, Joint Ventures and Variable Interest Entities, in the notes to our consolidated financial statements.

Other than normal property and equipment additions and replacements, expenditures to further the implementation of our various information technology systems, commitments under our incentive compensation programs, amounts we may expend to repurchase stock under our stock repurchase program and acquisitions from time to time and disposition costs, we currently do not have any significant capital expenditures or outlays planned except as described below. However, if we acquire additional businesses in the future or if we embark on other capital-intensive initiatives, additional working capital may be required.

Under our secured revolving credit facility and other facilities discussed in Other Debt and Other Items above, as of June 30, 2020, there was approximately $432.3 million, including both continuing and discontinued operations, outstanding under standby letters of credit primarily issued in connection with general and professional liability insurance programs and for contract performance guarantees. For those projects for which we have issued a performance guarantee, if the project subsequently fails to meet guaranteed performance standards, we may either incur significant additional costs or be held responsible for the costs incurred by the client to achieve the required performance standards.

We recognized on our balance sheet the funded status of our pension benefit plans, measured as the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit obligation. At June 30, 2020, our defined benefit pension plans had an aggregate deficit (the excess of projected benefit obligations over the fair value of plan assets) of approximately $331.9 million. The total amounts of employer contributions paid for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 were $5.5 million for U.S. plans and $20.7 million for non-U.S. plans. Funding requirements for each plan are determined based on the local laws of the country where such plan resides. In some countries, the funding requirements are mandatory while in other countries, they are discretionary. There is a required minimum contribution for one of our domestic plans; however, we may make additional discretionary contributions. In the future, such pension funding may increase or decrease depending on changes in the levels of interest rates, pension plan performance and other factors. In addition, we have collective bargaining agreements with unions that require us to contribute to various third party multiemployer pension plans that we do not control or manage. In addition, we have collective bargaining agreements with unions that require us to contribute to various third party multiemployer plans that we do not control or manage.

Condensed Combined Financial Information

In connection with the registration of the Company’s 2014 Senior Notes that were declared effective by the SEC on September 29, 2015, AECOM became subject to the requirements of Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X, as amended, regarding financial statements of guarantors and issuers of guaranteed securities. Both the 2014 Senior Notes and the 2017 Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several basis by some of AECOM’s directly and indirectly 100% owned subsidiaries (the Subsidiary Guarantors). Other than customary restrictions imposed by applicable statutes, there are no restrictions on the ability of the Subsidiary Guarantors to transfer funds to AECOM in the form of cash dividends, loans or advances.

The following tables present condensed combined summarized financial information for AECOM and the Subsidiary Guarantors. All intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in the presentation of the combined financial statements. Amounts provided do not represent our total consolidated amounts as of June 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019, and for the nine months ended June 30, 2020.

Table of Contents

Condensed Combined Balance Sheets

Parent and Subsidiary Guarantors

(unaudited - in millions)


	June 30, 2020		September 30, 2019
Current assets	$	3,700.3	$	3,433.0
Non-current assets		3,523.1		4,064.3
Total assets	$	7,223.4	$	7,497.3

Current liabilities	$	3,063.2	$	3,508.0
Non-current liabilities		2,847.7		3,177.9
Total liabilities		5,910.9		6,685.9

Total stockholders' equity		1,312.5		811.4
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	7,223.4	$	7,497.3

Table of Contents

Condensed Combined Statement of Operations

Parent and Subsidiary Guarantors

(unaudited - in millions)


	For the nine months ended
	June 30, 2020
Revenue	$	5,612.8
Cost of revenue		5,442.0
Gross profit		170.8

Net loss from continuing operations		(242.3)
Net income from discontinued operations		115.6
Net loss	$	(126.7)

Net loss attributable to AECOM	$	(126.7)

New Accounting Pronouncements and Changes in Accounting

For information regarding recent accounting pronouncements, see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Financial Market Risks

Financial Market Risks

We are exposed to market risk, primarily related to foreign currency exchange rates and interest rate exposure of our debt obligations that bear interest based on floating rates. We actively monitor these exposures. Our objective is to reduce, where we deem appropriate to do so, fluctuations in earnings and cash flows associated with changes in foreign exchange rates and interest rates. In order to accomplish this objective, we sometimes enter into derivative financial instruments, such as forward contracts and interest rate hedge contracts. It is our policy and practice to use derivative financial instruments only to the extent necessary to manage our exposures. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.

Foreign Exchange Rates

We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk resulting from our operations outside of the U.S. We use foreign currency forward contracts from time to time to mitigate foreign currency risk. We limit exposure to foreign currency fluctuations in most of our contracts through provisions that require client payments in currencies corresponding to the currency in which costs are incurred. As a result of this natural hedge, we generally do not need to hedge foreign currency cash flows for contract work performed. The functional currency of our significant foreign operations is the respective local currency.

Interest Rates

Our Credit Agreement and other debt obligations are subject to variable rate interest which could be adversely affected by an increase in interest rates. As of June 30, 2020, we had no outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit facility. Interest on amounts borrowed under these agreements is subject to adjustment based on specified levels of financial performance. The applicable margin that is added to the borrowing’s base rate can range from 0.25% to 2.00%. For the nine months ended June 30, 2020, our weighted average floating rate borrowings were $337.1 million. If short-term floating interest rates had increased by 1.00%, our interest expense for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 would have increased by $2.5 million. We invest our cash in a variety of financial instruments, consisting principally of money market securities or other highly liquid, short-term securities that are subject to minimal credit and market risk.

Table of Contents

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Based on management’s evaluation, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), our CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), were effective as of June 30, 2020 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or submitted under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2020 identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II.OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

As a government contractor, we are subject to various laws and regulations that are more restrictive than those applicable to non-government contractors. Intense government scrutiny of contractors’ compliance with those laws and regulations through audits and investigations is inherent in government contracting; and from time to time, we receive inquiries, subpoenas, and similar demands related to our ongoing business with government entities. Violations can result in civil or criminal liability as well as suspension or debarment from eligibility for awards of new government contracts or option renewals.

We are involved in various investigations, claims and lawsuits in the normal conduct of our business. We are not always aware if we or our affiliates are under investigation or the status of such matters. Although the outcome of our legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty and no assurances can be provided, in the opinion of our management, based upon current information and discussions with counsel, with the exception of the matters noted in Note 15, Commitments and Contingencies, to the financial statements contained in this report to the extent stated therein, none of the investigations, claims and lawsuits in which we are involved is expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, cash flows or our ability to conduct business. See Note 15, Commitments and Contingencies, to the financial statements contained in this report for a discussion of certain matters to which we are a party. The information set forth in such note is incorporated by reference into this Item 1. From time to time, we establish reserves for litigation or other proceedings when we consider it probable that a loss will occur.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

We operate in a changing environment that involves numerous known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could materially adversely affect our operations. The risks described below highlight some of the factors that have affected, and in the future could affect our operations. Additional risks we do not yet know of or that we currently believe are immaterial may also affect our business operations. If any of the events or circumstances described in the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Table of Contents

We face various risks related to health outbreaks such as the coronavirus that may have material adverse effects on our business, financial position, results of operations and/or cash flows.

We face various risks related to health epidemics, pandemics, and similar outbreaks, including the recent global outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic. If significant portions of our workforce are unable to work or travel effectively for a prolonged period because of government-mandated quarantines, closures, or other restrictions, then our business and financial operations will be significantly impacted. For example, work on some non-essential construction and other client projects has temporarily halted our services on these projects. Extended disruptions due to the coronavirus could further delay or limit our ability to perform services, make or receive timely payments, and impair our ability to win future contracts. The continued spread of coronavirus without any impact from any effective treatments may cause further financial instability increasing our costs and ability to access the capital markets. The coronavirus pandemic is expected to reduce demand for our services and impact client spending in certain circumstances. An extended health outbreak could adversely affect the world economy resulting in an economic downturn that could further affect demand for our services. Any cost increases due to the coronavirus may not be fully recoverable or adequately covered by our insurance. We cannot at this time predict the duration of the coronavirus pandemic or the impact of government regulations that might be imposed in response of the pandemic, however, the coronavirus pandemic may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

An extended government shutdown, payment delays or reduced demand for our services may have a material impact on our results of operation and financial condition.

An extended government shutdown could significantly reduce demand for our services, delay payment and result in workforce reductions that may have a material adverse effect on our results of operation and financial condition. Moreover, a prolonged government shutdown could result in program cancellations, disruptions and/or stop work orders and could limit the government’s ability to effectively process and our ability to perform government contracts and successfully compete for new work.

Demand for our services is cyclical and may be vulnerable to sudden economic downturns and reductions in government and private industry spending. If economic conditions remain uncertain and/or weaken, our revenue and profitability could be adversely affected.

Demand for our services is cyclical and may be vulnerable to sudden economic downturns, interest rate fluctuations and reductions in government and private industry spending that result in clients delaying, curtailing or canceling proposed and existing projects. For example, the coronavirus pandemic is expected to reduce demand for our services and impact client spending in certain circumstances. In addition, commodity price volatility has previously impacted our oil and gas business and business regions whose economies are substantially dependent on commodities prices such as the Middle East and has also impacted North American oil and gas clients’ investment decisions.

Where economies are weakening, our clients may demand more favorable pricing or other terms while their ability to pay our invoices or to pay them in a timely manner may be adversely affected. Our government clients may face budget deficits that prohibit them from funding proposed and existing projects. If economic conditions remain uncertain and/or weaken and/or government spending is reduced, our revenue and profitability could be materially adversely affected.

We depend on long-term government contracts, some of which are only funded on an annual basis. If appropriations for funding are not made in subsequent years of a multiple-year contract, we may not be able to realize all of our anticipated revenue and profits from that project.

A substantial portion of our revenue is derived from contracts with agencies and departments of national, state and local governments. During fiscal 2019, approximately 44% of our revenue was derived from contracts with government entities.

Most government contracts are subject to the government’s budgetary approval process. Legislatures typically appropriate funds for a given program on a year-by-year basis, even though contract performance may take more than

Table of Contents

one year. In addition, public-supported financing such as state and local municipal bonds may be only partially raised to support existing infrastructure projects. As a result, at the beginning of a program, the related contract is only partially funded, and additional funding is normally committed only as appropriations are made in each fiscal year. These appropriations, and the timing of payment of appropriated amounts, may be influenced by, among other things, the state of the economy, a government shutdown, competing priorities for appropriation, changes in administration or control of legislatures and the timing and amount of tax receipts and the overall level of government expenditures. Similarly, the impact of an economic downturn on state and local governments, including as a result of the coronavirus, may make it more difficult for them to fund infrastructure projects. If appropriations are not made in subsequent years on our government contracts, then we will not realize all of our potential revenue and profit from that contract.

If we are unable to win or renew government contracts during regulated procurement processes, our operations and financial results would be harmed.

Government contracts are awarded through a regulated procurement process. The federal government has awarded multi-year contracts with pre-established terms and conditions, such as indefinite delivery contracts, that generally require those contractors that have previously been awarded the indefinite delivery contract to engage in an additional competitive bidding process before a task order is issued. In addition, the federal government has also awarded federal contracts based on a low-price, technically acceptable criteria emphasizing price over qualitative factors, such as past performance. As a result of these competitive pricing pressures, our profit margins on future federal contracts may be reduced and may require us to make sustained efforts to reduce costs in order to realize revenues and profits under government contracts. If we are not successful in reducing the amount of costs we incur, our profitability on government contracts will be negatively impacted. In addition, we may not be awarded government contracts because of existing government policies designed to protect small businesses and under-represented minority contractors. Our inability to win or renew government contracts during regulated procurement processes could harm our operations and reduce our profits and revenues.

Governmental agencies may modify, curtail or terminate our contracts at any time prior to their completion and, if we do not replace them, we may suffer a decline in revenue.

Most government contracts may be modified, curtailed or terminated by the government either at its discretion or upon the default of the contractor. If the government terminates a contract at its discretion, then we typically are able to recover only costs incurred or committed, settlement expenses and profit on work completed prior to termination, which could prevent us from recognizing all of our potential revenue and profits from that contract. In addition, for some assignments, the U.S. government may attempt to “insource” the services to government employees rather than outsource to a contractor. If a government terminates a contract due to our default, we could be liable for excess costs incurred by the government in obtaining services from another source.

Our contracts with governmental agencies are subject to audit, which could result in adjustments to reimbursable contract costs or, if we are charged with wrongdoing, possible temporary or permanent suspension from participating in government programs.

Our books and records are subject to audit by the various governmental agencies we serve and their representatives. These audits can result in adjustments to the amount of contract costs we believe are reimbursable by the agencies and the amount of our overhead costs allocated to the agencies. If such matters are not resolved in our favor, they could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, if one of our subsidiaries is charged with wrongdoing as a result of an audit, that subsidiary, and possibly our company as a whole, could be temporarily suspended or could be prohibited from bidding on and receiving future government contracts for a period of time. Furthermore, as a government contractor, we are subject to an increased risk of investigations, criminal prosecution, civil fraud actions, whistleblower lawsuits and other legal actions and liabilities to which purely private sector companies are not, the results of which could materially adversely impact our business. For example, from time to time we may be subject to qui tam lawsuits. Qui tam lawsuits typically allege that we have made false statements or certifications in connection with claims for payment, or improperly retained overpayments, from the government. These suits may remain under seal (and hence, be unknown to us) for some time while the government decides whether to intervene on behalf of the qui tam plaintiff.

Table of Contents

Our substantial leverage and significant debt service obligations could adversely affect our financial condition and our ability to fulfill our obligations and operate our business.

We had approximately $2.1 billion of indebtedness (excluding intercompany indebtedness) outstanding as of June 30, 2020, of which $48.1 million was secured obligations (exclusive of $21.2 million of outstanding undrawn letters of credit) and, as of June 30, 2020, we have an additional $1.3 billion of availability under our Credit Agreement (after giving effect to outstanding letters of credit), all of which would be secured debt, if drawn. Our financial performance could be adversely affected by our substantial leverage. We may also incur significant additional indebtedness in the future, subject to various conditions.

This high level of indebtedness could have important negative consequences to us, including, but not limited to:

●

we may have difficulty satisfying our obligations with respect to outstanding debt obligations;

●

we may have difficulty obtaining financing in the future for working capital, acquisitions, capital expenditures or other purposes;

●

we may need to use all, or a substantial portion, of our available excess cash flow to pay interest and principal on our debt, which will reduce the amount of money available to finance our operations and other business activities, including, but not limited to, working capital requirements, acquisitions, capital expenditures or other general corporate or business activities;

●

our debt level increases our vulnerability to general economic downturns and adverse industry conditions;

●

our debt level could limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and in our industry in general;

●

our substantial amount of debt and the amount we must pay to service our debt obligations could place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt;

●

we may have increased borrowing costs;

●

our clients, surety providers or insurance carriers may react adversely to our significant debt level;

●

we may have insufficient funds, and our debt level may also restrict us from raising the funds necessary, to retire our debt instruments tendered to us upon maturity of our debt or the occurrence of a change of control, which would constitute an event of default under our debt instruments; and

●

our failure to comply with the financial and other restrictive covenants in our debt instruments which, among other things, require us to maintain specified financial ratios and limit our ability to incur debt and sell assets, could result in an event of default that, if not cured or waived, could have a material adverse effect on our business or prospects.

Our high level of indebtedness requires that we use a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to pay principal of, and interest on, our indebtedness, which will reduce the availability of cash to fund working capital requirements, future acquisitions, capital expenditures or other general corporate or business activities.

In addition, a portion of our indebtedness bears interest at variable rates, including borrowings under our Credit Agreement. If market interest rates increase, debt service on our variable-rate debt will rise, which could adversely affect our cash flow, results of operations and financial position. Although we may employ hedging strategies such that a portion of the aggregate principal amount of our term loans carries a fixed rate of interest, any hedging arrangement put in place may not offer complete protection from this risk. Additionally, the remaining portion of borrowings under our Credit Agreement that is not hedged will be subject to changes in interest rates.

Table of Contents

The agreements governing our debt contain a number of restrictive covenants which will limit our ability to finance future operations, acquisitions or capital needs or engage in other business activities that may be in our interest.

The Credit Agreement and the indentures governing our debt contain a number of significant covenants that impose operating and other restrictions on us and our subsidiaries. Such restrictions affect or will affect, and in many respects limit or prohibit, among other things, our ability and the ability of some of our subsidiaries to:

●

incur additional indebtedness;

●

create liens;

●

pay dividends and make other distributions in respect of our equity securities;

●

redeem or repurchase our equity securities;

●

distribute excess cash flow from foreign to domestic subsidiaries;

●

make investments or other restricted payments;

●

sell assets;

●

enter into transactions with affiliates; and

●

effect mergers or consolidations.

In addition, our Credit Agreement also requires us to comply with a consolidated interest coverage ratio and consolidated leverage ratio. Our ability to comply with these ratios may be affected by events beyond our control.

These restrictions could limit our ability to plan for or react to market or economic conditions or meet capital needs or otherwise restrict our activities or business plans, and could adversely affect our ability to finance our operations, acquisitions, investments or strategic alliances or other capital needs or to engage in other business activities that would be in our interest.

A breach of any of these covenants or our inability to comply with the required financial ratios could result in a default under our debt instruments. If an event of default occurs, our creditors could elect to:

●

declare all borrowings outstanding, together with accrued and unpaid interest, to be immediately due and payable;

●

require us to apply all of our available cash to repay the borrowings; or

●

prevent us from making debt service payments on our borrowings.

If we were unable to repay or otherwise refinance these borrowings when due, the applicable creditors could sell the collateral securing some of our debt instruments, which constitutes substantially all of our domestic and foreign, wholly owned subsidiaries’ assets.

Our variable rate indebtedness subjects us to interest rate risk, which could cause our debt service obligations to increase significantly.

Borrowings under our Credit Agreement are at variable rates of interest and expose us to interest rate risk. If interest rates increase, our debt service obligations on the variable rate indebtedness will increase even though the amount borrowed remains the same, and our net income and cash flows, including cash available for servicing our indebtedness, will correspondingly decrease. A 1.00% increase in such interest rates would increase total interest expense under our Credit Agreement for the nine months ended June 30, 2020 by $2.5 million, including the effect of

Table of Contents

our interest rate swaps. We may, from time to time, enter into additional interest rate swaps that involve the exchange of floating for fixed rate interest payments in order to reduce interest rate volatility. However, we may not maintain interest rate swaps with respect to all of our variable rate indebtedness, and any swaps we enter into may not fully mitigate our interest rate risk and could be subject to credit risk themselves.

If we are unable to continue to access credit on acceptable terms, our business may be adversely affected.

The changing nature of the global credit markets could make it more difficult for us to access funds, refinance our existing indebtedness, enter into agreements for uncommitted debt bond facilities and new indebtedness, replace our existing revolving and term credit agreements or obtain funding through the issuance of our securities. We use credit facilities to support our working capital and other needs. There is no guarantee that we can continue to renew our credit facility on terms as favorable as those in our existing credit facility and, if we are unable to do so, our costs of borrowing and our business may be adversely affected.

The uncertainty surrounding the implementation of, and effects of, the United Kingdom’s proposed withdrawal from the European Union could have an adverse effect on our business and financial results.

In March 2017, the United Kingdom government initiated a process to withdraw from the European Union (Brexit) and began negotiating the terms of its separation. A withdrawal without a trade agreement in place could significantly disrupt the free movement of goods, services, and people between the United Kingdom and the European Union, and result in increased legal and regulatory complexities, as well as potential higher costs of conducting business in Europe. Further, the uncertainty surrounding Brexit has created substantial economic and political uncertainty and volatility in currency exchange rates. Our United Kingdom business is a significant part of our European operations with approximately 7,000 employees and revenues representing approximately 6% of our total revenue for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2019. The uncertainty created by Brexit may cause our customers to closely monitor their costs and reduce demand for our services and may ultimately result in new regulatory and cost challenges for our United Kingdom and global operations. Any of these events could adversely affect our United Kingdom, European and overall business and financial results.

Our operations worldwide expose us to legal, political and economic risks in different countries as well as currency exchange rate fluctuations that could harm our business and financial results.

During fiscal 2019, revenue attributable to our services provided outside of the United States to non-U.S. clients was approximately 29% of our total revenue. There are risks inherent in doing business internationally, including:

●

imposition of governmental controls and changes in laws, regulations or policies;

●

political and economic instability, such as in the Middle East and South East Asia;

●

civil unrest, acts of terrorism, force majeure, war, or other armed conflict;

●

changes in U.S. and other national government trade policies affecting the markets for our services, such as recent retaliatory tariffs between the United States and China;

●

recent political unrest in Hong Kong where AECOM has a significant presence;

●

impact of the coronavirus and its related economic impacts;

●

changes in regulatory practices, tariffs and taxes, such as Brexit;

●

potential non-compliance with a wide variety of laws and regulations, including anti-corruption, export control and anti-boycott laws and similar non-U.S. laws and regulations;

●

changes in labor conditions;

Table of Contents

●

logistical and communication challenges; and

●

currency exchange rate fluctuations, devaluations and other conversion restrictions.

Any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

In addition, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Bahrain and Egypt have cut diplomatic ties and restricted business with Qatar by closing off access to that country with an air, sea and land traffic embargo. During the economic embargo, products cannot be shipped directly to Qatar from the UAE, Saudi Arabia or Bahrain and financial services may be limited. Our Qatarian business is a significant part of our Middle East operations with approximately several hundred employees. The economic embargo may make it difficult to complete ongoing Qatarian projects and could reduce future demand for our services.

We operate in many different jurisdictions and we could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-corruption laws.

The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and similar worldwide anti-corruption laws, including the U.K. Bribery Act of 2010, generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to non-U.S. officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Our internal policies mandate compliance with these anti-corruption laws, including the requirements to maintain accurate information and internal controls which may fall within the purview of the FCPA, its books and records provisions or its anti-bribery provisions. We operate in many parts of the world that have experienced governmental corruption to some degree; and, in some circumstances, strict compliance with anti-corruption laws may conflict with local customs and practices. Despite our training and compliance programs, we cannot assure that our internal control policies and procedures always will protect us from reckless or criminal acts committed by our employees or agents. In addition, from time to time, government investigations of corruption in construction-related industries affect us and our peers. Violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could disrupt our business and result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

We work in international locations where there are high security risks, which could result in harm to our employees and contractors or material costs to us.

Some of our services are performed in high-risk locations, such as the Middle East, Africa, and Southwest Asia, where the country or location is suffering from political, social or economic problems, or war or civil unrest. In those locations where we have employees or operations, we may incur material costs to maintain the safety of our personnel. Despite these precautions, the safety of our personnel in these locations may continue to be at risk. Acts of terrorism and threats of armed conflicts in or around various areas in which we operate could limit or disrupt markets and our operations, including disruptions resulting from the evacuation of personnel, cancellation of contracts, or the loss of key employees, contractors or assets.

Many of our project sites are inherently dangerous workplaces. Failure to maintain safe work sites and equipment could result in environmental disasters, employee deaths or injuries, reduced profitability, the loss of projects or clients and possible exposure to litigation.

Our project sites often put our employees and others in close proximity with mechanized equipment, moving vehicles, chemical and manufacturing processes, and highly regulated materials. On some project sites, we may be responsible for safety and, accordingly, we have an obligation to implement effective safety procedures. If we fail to implement these procedures or if the procedures we implement are ineffective, we may suffer the loss of or injury to our employees, as well as expose ourselves to possible litigation. As a result, our failure to maintain adequate safety standards and equipment could result in reduced profitability or the loss of projects or clients, and could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Table of Contents

Cybersecurity threats, information technology systems outages and data privacy incidents could adversely harm our business.

We develop, install and maintain information technology systems for our clients and employees. We may experience errors, outages, or delays of service in our information technology systems, which could significantly disrupt our operations, impact our clients and employees, damage our reputation, and result in litigation and regulatory fines or penalties. Client contracts for the performance of information technology services, primarily with the federal government, as well as various privacy and securities laws pertaining to client and employee usage, require us to manage and protect sensitive and proprietary information. For example, the European’s Union General Data Protection Regulation extends the scope of the European Union data protection laws to all companies processing data of European Union residents, regardless of the company’s location. In addition, the California Consumer Privacy Act increased the penalties for data privacy incidents.

We face threats to our information technology systems, including unauthorized access, computer hackers, computer viruses, malicious code, cyber-attacks, phishing and other cybersecurity problems and system disruptions, including possible unauthorized access to our and our clients’ proprietary information. We rely on industry-accepted security measures and technology to securely maintain all proprietary information on our information technology systems. In the ordinary course of business, we have been targeted by malicious cyber-attacks. Anyone who circumvents our security measures could misappropriate proprietary information, including information regarding us, our employees and/or our clients, or cause interruptions in our operations. Although we devote significant resources to our cybersecurity programs and have implemented security measures to protect our systems and to prevent, detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents, there can be no assurance that our efforts will prevent these threats. As these security threats continue to evolve, we may be required to devote additional resources to protect, prevent, detect and respond against system disruptions and security breaches.

We also rely in part on third-party software and information technology vendors to run our critical accounting, project management and financial information systems. We depend on our software and information technology vendors to provide long-term software and hardware support for our information systems. Our software and information technology vendors may decide to discontinue further development, integration or long-term software and hardware support for our information systems, in which case we may need to abandon one or more of our current information systems and migrate some or all of our accounting, project management and financial information to other systems, thus increasing our operational expense, as well as disrupting the management of our business operations.

Any of these events could damage our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Furthermore, while we maintain insurance that specifically covers these attacks, our coverage may not sufficiently cover all types of losses or claims that may arise.

An impairment charge of goodwill could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

Because we have grown in part through acquisitions, goodwill and intangible assets-net represent a substantial portion of our assets. Under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP), we are required to test goodwill carried in our Consolidated Balance Sheets for possible impairment on an annual basis based upon a fair value approach and whenever events occur that indicate impairment could exist. These events or circumstances could include a significant change in the business climate, including a significant sustained decline in a reporting unit’s market value, legal factors, operating performance indicators, competition, sale or disposition of a significant portion of our business, a significant sustained decline in our market capitalization and other factors. For example, in the year ended September 30, 2019, we recorded a noncash impairment of long-lived assets, including goodwill of $615.4 million primarily related to a decrease in the estimated recovery and fair value of reporting units with self-performed at-risk construction.

In addition, if we experience a decrease in our stock price and market capitalization over a sustained period, we could have to record an impairment charge in the future. The amount of any impairment could be significant and could

Table of Contents

have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations for the period in which the charge is taken.

Our business and operating results could be adversely affected by losses under fixed-price or guaranteed maximum price contracts.

Fixed-price contracts require us to either perform all work under the contract for a specified lump-sum or to perform an estimated number of units of work at an agreed price per unit, with the total payment determined by the actual number of units performed. In addition, we may enter guaranteed maximum price contracts where we guarantee a price or delivery date. For the year ended September 30, 2019, our revenue was comprised of 44%, 29%, and 27% cost-reimbursable, guaranteed maximum price, and fixed-price contracts, respectively. Fixed-price contracts expose us to a number of risks not inherent in cost-reimbursable contracts, including underestimation of costs, ambiguities in specifications, unforeseen increases in or failures in estimating the cost of raw materials, equipment or labor, problems with new technologies, delays beyond our control, fluctuations in profit margins, failures of subcontractors to perform and economic or other changes that may occur during the contract period. United States and foreign trade policy actions and tariffs such as the 2018 tariffs on steel and aluminum imports in the United States could affect the profitability of our fixed-price construction projects. Losses under fixed-price or guaranteed contracts could be substantial and adversely impact our results of operations.

Our failure to meet contractual schedule or performance requirements that we have guaranteed could adversely affect our operating results.

In some circumstances, we can incur liquidated or other damages if we do not achieve project completion by a scheduled date. If we or an entity for which we have provided a guarantee subsequently fails to complete the project as scheduled and the matter cannot be satisfactorily resolved with the client, we may be responsible for cost impacts to the client resulting from any delay or the cost to complete the project. Our costs generally increase from schedule delays and/or could exceed our projections for a particular project. In addition, project performance can be affected by a number of factors beyond our control, including unavoidable delays from governmental inaction, public opposition, inability to obtain financing, weather conditions, unavailability of vendor materials, changes in the project scope of services requested by our clients, industrial accidents, environmental hazards, labor disruptions, pandemics including the current coronavirus, and other factors. Material performance problems for existing and future contracts could cause actual results of operations to differ from those anticipated by us and also could cause us to suffer damage to our reputation within our industry and client base.

We may not be able to maintain adequate surety and financial capacity necessary for us to successfully bid on and win contracts.

In line with industry practice, we are often required to provide surety bonds, standby letters of credit or corporate guarantees to our clients that indemnify the customer should our affiliate fail to perform its obligations under the terms of a contract. As of June 30, 2020 and September 30, 2019, we were contingently liable for $5.2 billion and $4.8 billion, respectively, in issued surety bonds primarily to support project execution and we had outstanding letters of credit totaling $432.3 million and $493.7 million, respectively. A surety may issue a performance or payment bond to guarantee to the client that our affiliate will perform under the terms of a contract. If our affiliate fails to perform under the terms of the contract, then the client may demand that the surety or another corporate affiliate provide the contracted services. In addition, we would typically have obligations to indemnify the surety for any loss incurred in connection with the bond. If a surety bond or a letter of credit is required for a particular project and we are unable to obtain an appropriate surety bond or letter of credit, we may not be able to pursue that project, which in turn could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

We conduct a portion of our operations through joint venture entities, over which we may have limited control.

Approximately 11% of our fiscal 2019 revenue was derived from our operations through joint ventures or similar partnership arrangements, where control may be shared with unaffiliated third parties. As with most joint venture arrangements, differences in views among the joint venture participants may result in delayed decisions or disputes. We

Table of Contents

also cannot control the actions of our joint venture partners and we typically have joint and several liability with our joint venture partners under the applicable contracts for joint venture projects. These factors could potentially adversely impact the business and operations of a joint venture and, in turn, our business and operations.

Operating through joint ventures in which we are minority holders results in us having limited control over many decisions made with respect to projects and internal controls relating to projects. Sales of our services provided to our unconsolidated joint ventures were approximately 3% of our fiscal 2019 revenue. We generally do not have control of these unconsolidated joint ventures. These joint ventures may not be subject to the same requirements regarding internal controls and internal control over financial reporting that we follow. As a result, internal control problems may arise with respect to these joint ventures, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations and could also affect our reputation in the industries we serve.

We participate in joint ventures where we provide guarantees and may be adversely impacted by the failure of the joint venture or its participants to fulfill their obligations.

We have investments in and commitments to joint ventures with unrelated parties, including in connection with construction services, government services, and the investment activities of ACAP. For example, real estate and infrastructure joint ventures are inherently risky and may result in future losses since real estate markets are impacted by economic trends and government policies that we do not control. These joint ventures from time to time may borrow money to help finance their activities and in some circumstances, we are required to provide guarantees of obligations of our affiliated entities. In addition, in connection with the investment activities of ACAP, we provide guarantees of obligations, including guarantees for completion of projects, repayment of debt, environmental indemnity obligations and other lender required guarantees. If these entities are not able to honor their obligations under the guarantees, we may be required to expend additional resources or suffer losses, which could be significant.

AECOM Capital’s real estate development and investment activities are inherently risky and may result in a future loss.

ACAP’s real estate business involves managing, sponsoring, investing and developing commercial real estate projects (Real Estate Joint Ventures) that are inherently risky and may result in future losses since real estate markets are significantly impacted by economic trends and government policies that we do not control. Our registered investment adviser jointly manages and sponsors the AECOM-Canyon Equity Fund, L.P. (the “Fund”), in which the Company indirectly holds an equity interest and which also invests and develops Real Estate Joint Ventures on behalf of its investors. Real Estate Joint Ventures rely on substantial amounts of third party borrowing to finance their development activities including completion guarantees, repayment guarantees, environmental indemnities and other lender required credit support guarantees that may be provided by AECOM or an affiliate to secure the Real Estate Joint Venture financing. Although the Fund and the Real Estate Ventures have reserves that will be used to share any cost overruns of the Real Estate Joint Ventures, if such reserves are depleted, then AECOM may be required to make support payments to fund non-budgeted cost overruns on behalf of the Fund (but not on behalf of the Fund’s co-partner or any unaffiliated limited partners of the Real Estate Joint Ventures). Some of the Fund’s limited partners may be permitted to make additional equity co-investments in certain Real Estate Joint Ventures for which AECOM will provide support payments on behalf of the limited partner co-investor in the event of a cost overrun of the Real Estate Joint Venture after additional specific reserves have been depleted. AECOM’s provision of lender guarantees is contingent upon the Real Estate Joint Ventures meeting AECOM’s underwriting criteria, including an affiliate of AECOM acting as either the construction manager at risk or the owner’s representative for the project, no material adverse change in AECOM’s financial condition, and the guarantee not violating a covenant under a material AECOM agreement.

Misconduct by our employees, partners or consultants or our failure to comply with laws or regulations applicable to our business could cause us to lose customers or lose our ability to contract with government agencies.

As a government contractor, misconduct, fraud or other improper activities caused by our employees’, partners’ or consultants’ failure to comply with laws or regulations could have a significant negative impact on our business and reputation. Such misconduct could include the failure to comply with procurement regulations, environmental regulations, regulations regarding the protection of sensitive government information, legislation regarding the pricing of

Table of Contents

labor and other costs in government contracts, regulations on lobbying or similar activities, and anti-corruption, anti-competition, export control and other applicable laws or regulations. Our failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations, misconduct by any of our employees or consultants or our failure to make timely and accurate certifications to government agencies regarding misconduct or potential misconduct could subject us to fines and penalties, loss of government granted eligibility, cancellation of contracts and suspension or debarment from contracting with government agencies, any of which may adversely affect our business.

We may be required to contribute additional cash to meet our significant underfunded benefit obligations associated with pension benefit plans we manage or multiemployer pension plans in which we participate.

We have defined benefit pension plans for employees in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and Ireland. At September 30, 2019, our defined benefit pension plans had an aggregate deficit (the excess of projected benefit obligations over the fair value of plan assets) of approximately $365.1 million. In the future, our pension deficits may increase or decrease depending on changes in the levels of interest rates, pension plan performance and other factors that may require us to make additional cash contributions to our pension plans and recognize further increases in our net pension cost to satisfy our funding requirements. If we are forced or elect to make up all or a portion of the deficit for unfunded benefit plans, our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

A multiemployer pension plan is typically established under a collective bargaining agreement with a union to cover the union-represented workers of various unrelated companies. Our collective bargaining agreements with unions will require us to contribute to various multiemployer pension plans; however, we do not control or manage these plans. For the year ended September 30, 2019, we contributed $7.5 million to multiemployer pension plans. Under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, an employer who contributes to a multiemployer pension plan, absent an applicable exemption, may also be liable, upon termination or withdrawal from the plan, for its proportionate share of the multiemployer pension plan’s unfunded vested benefit. If we terminate or withdraw from a multiemployer plan, absent an applicable exemption (such as for some plans in the building and construction industry), we could be required to contribute a significant amount of cash to fund the multiemployer plan’s unfunded vested benefit, which could materially and adversely affect our financial results; however, since we do not control the multiemployer plans, we are unable to estimate any potential contributions that could be required.

New legal requirements could adversely affect our operating results.

Our business and results of operations could be adversely affected by the passage of climate change, defense, environmental, infrastructure and other laws, policies and regulations. Growing concerns about climate change and greenhouse gases, such as those adopted under the United Nations COP-21 Paris Agreement may result in the imposition of additional environmental regulations for our clients’ fossil fuel projects. For example, legislation, international protocols, regulation or other restrictions on emissions regulations could increase the costs of projects for our clients or, in some cases, prevent a project from going forward, thereby potentially reducing the need for our services. In addition, relaxation or repeal of laws and regulations, or changes in governmental policies regarding environmental, defense, infrastructure or other industries we serve could result in a decline in demand for our services, which could in turn negatively impact our revenues. We cannot predict when or whether any of these various proposals may be enacted or what their effect will be on us or on our customers.

We may be subject to substantial liabilities under environmental laws and regulations.

Our services are subject to numerous environmental protection laws and regulations that are complex and stringent. Our business involves in part the planning, design, program management, construction and construction management, and operations and maintenance at various sites, including but not limited to, pollution control systems, nuclear facilities, hazardous waste and Superfund sites, contract mining sites, hydrocarbon production, distribution and transport sites, military bases and other infrastructure-related facilities. We also regularly perform work, including construction services in and around sensitive environmental areas, such as rivers, lakes and wetlands. In addition, we have contracts in support of U.S. federal government entities to destroy hazardous materials, including chemical agents and weapons stockpiles, as well as to decontaminate and decommission nuclear facilities. These activities may require us to manage, handle, remove, treat, transport and dispose of toxic or hazardous substances. We also own and operate

Table of Contents

several properties in the U.S. and Canada that have been used for the storage and maintenance of construction equipment. In the conduct of operations on these properties, and despite precautions having been taken, it is possible that there have been accidental releases of individually relatively small amounts of fuel, oils, hydraulic fluids and other fluids while storing or servicing this equipment. Such accidental releases though individually relatively small may have accumulated over time. Past business practices at companies that we have acquired may also expose us to future unknown environmental liabilities.

Significant fines, penalties and other sanctions may be imposed for non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations, and some environmental laws provide for joint and several strict liabilities for remediation of releases of hazardous substances, rendering a person liable for environmental damage, without regard to negligence or fault on the part of such person. These laws and regulations may expose us to liability arising out of the conduct of operations or conditions caused by others, or for our acts that were in compliance with all applicable laws at the time these acts were performed. For example, there are a number of governmental laws that strictly regulate the handling, removal, treatment, transportation and disposal of toxic and hazardous substances, such as Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, and comparable state laws, that impose strict, joint and several liabilities for the entire cost of cleanup, without regard to whether a company knew of or caused the release of hazardous substances. In addition, some environmental regulations can impose liability for the entire cleanup upon owners, operators, generators, transporters and other persons arranging for the treatment or disposal of such hazardous substances related to contaminated facilities or project sites. Other federal environmental, health and safety laws affecting us include, but are not limited to, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Air Mercury Rule, the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act and the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act and the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as well as other comparable national and state laws. Liabilities related to environmental contamination or human exposure to hazardous substances, or a failure to comply with applicable regulations could result in substantial costs to us, including cleanup costs, fines and civil or criminal sanctions, third-party claims for property damage or personal injury or cessation of remediation activities. Our continuing work in the areas governed by these laws and regulations exposes us to the risk of substantial liability.

AECOM is a smaller, less diversified company after the sale of our Management Services business and more vulnerable to changing market conditions.

AECOM is a smaller, less diversified company after the sale of our Management Services business and more reliant on our remaining business segments. The diversification of revenues, costs, and cash flows is reduced as a result of the sale, such that our results of operations, cash flows, working capital, effective tax rate, and financing requirements may be subject to increased volatility and our ability to fund capital expenditures, investments and service debt may be diminished. Restructuring costs and other costs incurred in connection with the Management Services sale may exceed our estimates or diminish the benefits we expected to realize. In addition, any contingent purchase price adjustments could be unfavorable and result in lower aggregate cash proceeds. We are also obligated to incur ongoing costs and retain certain legal claims that were previously allocated to the Management Services business. As a result, we may be more vulnerable to changing market conditions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We may be unable to successfully execute or effectively integrate acquisitions and divestitures may not occur as planned.

We regularly review our portfolio of businesses and pursue growth through acquisitions and seek to divest non-core businesses. We may not be able to complete transactions on favorable terms, on a timely basis, or at all, and during the integration of any acquisition, we may discover regulatory and compliance issues. In addition, our results of operations and cash flows may be adversely impacted by (i) the failure of acquired businesses to meet or exceed expected returns; (ii) the failure to integrate acquired businesses on schedule and/or to achieve expected synergies; (iii) the inability to dispose of non-core assets and businesses on satisfactory terms and conditions; (iv) diversion of attention and increased burdens on our employees; and (v) the discovery of unanticipated liabilities or other problems in acquired businesses for which we lack contractual protections, insurance or indemnities, or with regard to divested businesses,

Table of Contents

claims by purchasers to whom we have provided contractual indemnification. Additional difficulties we may encounter as part of the integration process include the following:

●

the consequences of a change in tax treatment and the possibility that the full benefits anticipated from the acquisition or disposition will not be realized;

●

any delay in the integration or disposition of management teams, strategies, operations, products and services;

●

differences in business backgrounds, corporate cultures and management philosophies that may delay successful integration;

●

the ability to retain key employees;

●

the ability to create and enforce uniform standards, controls, procedures, policies and information systems;

●

the challenge of restructuring complex systems, technology, networks and other assets in a seamless manner that minimizes any adverse impact on customers, suppliers, employees and other constituencies;

●

potential unknown liabilities and unforeseen increased expenses or delays associated with the acquisition, including costs to integrate beyond current estimates;

●

the ability to deduct or claim tax attributes or benefits such as operating losses, business or foreign tax credits; and

●

the disruption of, or the loss of momentum in, each company’s ongoing businesses or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies.

Any of these factors could adversely affect our ability to maintain relationships with customers, suppliers, employees and other constituencies or could reduce our earnings or otherwise adversely affect our business and financial results.

Our plans to divest certain businesses are subject to various risks and uncertainties and may not be completed in accordance with the expected plans or anticipated time frame, or at all, and will involve significant time and expense, which could disrupt or adversely affect our business.

Divesting businesses involve risks and uncertainties, such as the difficulty separating assets related to such businesses from the businesses we retain, employee distraction, the need to obtain regulatory approvals and other third-party consents, which potentially disrupts customer and vendor relationships, and the fact that we may be subject to additional tax obligations or loss of certain tax benefits. Such actions also involve significant costs and require time and attention of our management, which may divert attention from other business operations. Because of these challenges, as well as market conditions or other factors, the anticipated divestitures may take longer or be costlier or generate fewer benefits than expected and may not be completed at all. If we are unable to complete the divestitures or to successfully transition divested businesses, our business and financial results could be negatively impacted. After we dispose of a business, we may retain exposure on financial or performance guarantees and other contractual, employment, pension and severance obligations, and potential liabilities that may arise under law because of the disposition or the subsequent failure of an acquirer. As a result, performance by the divested businesses or other conditions outside of our control could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. In addition, the divestiture of any business could negatively impact our profitability because of losses that may result from such a sale, the loss of sales and operating income, or a decrease in cash flows.

Table of Contents

Our ability to compete in our industry will be harmed if we do not retain the continued services of our senior management and key technical personnel.

We rely heavily upon the expertise and leadership of our senior management. In addition, there is strong competition for qualified technical and management personnel in the sectors in which we compete. We may not be able to continue to attract and retain qualified technical and management personnel, such as engineers, architects and project managers, who are necessary for the development of our business or to replace qualified personnel in the timeframe demanded by our clients. Also, some of our personnel hold government granted eligibility that may be required to obtain government projects. If we were to lose some or all of these personnel, they would be difficult to replace. Loss of the services of, or failure to recruit senior management or key technical personnel could impact the long term performance of the Company and limit our ability to successfully complete existing projects and compete for new projects.

Our revenue and growth prospects may be harmed if we or our employees are unable to obtain government granted eligibility or other qualifications we and they need to perform services for our customers.

A number of government programs require contractors to have government granted eligibility, such as security clearance credentials. Depending on the project, eligibility can be difficult and time-consuming to obtain. If we or our employees are unable to obtain or retain the necessary eligibility, we may not be able to win new business, and our existing customers could terminate their contracts with us or decide not to renew them. To the extent we cannot obtain or maintain the required security clearances for our employees working on a particular contract, we may not derive the revenue or profit anticipated from such contract.

Our industry is highly competitive and we may be unable to compete effectively, which could result in reduced revenue, profitability and market share.

We are engaged in a highly competitive business. The markets we serve are highly fragmented and we compete with a large number of regional, national and international companies. These competitors may have greater financial and other resources than we do. Others are smaller and more specialized, and concentrate their resources in particular areas of expertise. The extent of our competition varies according to the particular markets and geographic area. In addition, the technical and professional aspects of some of our services generally do not require large upfront capital expenditures and provide limited barriers against new competitors.

The degree and type of competition we face is also influenced by the type and scope of a particular project. Our clients make competitive determinations based upon qualifications, experience, performance, reputation, technology, customer relationships, price and ability to provide the relevant services in a timely, safe and cost-efficient manner. Increased competition may result in our inability to win bids for future projects, increased margin pressure and loss of revenue, profitability and market share.

If we extend a significant portion of our credit to clients in a specific geographic area or industry, we may experience disproportionately high levels of collection risk and nonpayment if those clients are adversely affected by factors particular to their geographic area or industry.

Our clients include public and private entities that have been, and may continue to be, negatively impacted by the changing landscape in the global economy. While outside of the U.S. federal government, no one client accounted for over 10% of our revenue for fiscal 2019, we face collection risk as a normal part of our business where we perform services and subsequently bill our clients for such services, or when we make equity investments in majority or minority controlled large-scale client projects and other long-term capital projects before the project completes operational status or completes its project financing. In the event that we have concentrated credit risk from clients in a specific geographic area or industry, continuing negative trends or a worsening in the financial condition of that specific geographic area or industry could make us susceptible to disproportionately high levels of default by those clients. Such defaults could materially adversely impact our revenues and our results of operations.

Table of Contents

Our services expose us to significant risks of liability and our insurance policies may not provide adequate coverage.

Our services involve significant risks of professional and other liabilities that may substantially exceed the fees that we derive from our services. In addition, we sometimes contractually assume liability to clients on projects under indemnification or guarantee agreements. We cannot predict the magnitude of potential liabilities from the operation of our business. In addition, in the ordinary course of our business, we frequently make professional judgments and recommendations about environmental and engineering conditions of project sites for our clients. We may be deemed to be responsible for these professional judgments and recommendations if they are later determined to be inaccurate. Any unfavorable legal ruling against us could result in substantial monetary damages or even criminal violations.

Our professional liability policies cover only claims made during the term of the policy. Additionally, our insurance policies may not protect us against potential liability due to various exclusions in the policies and self-insured retention amounts. Partially or completely uninsured claims, if successful and of significant magnitude, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Unavailability or cancellation of third-party insurance coverage would increase our overall risk exposure as well as disrupt the management of our business operations.

We maintain insurance coverage from third-party insurers as part of our overall risk management strategy and because some of our contracts require us to maintain specific insurance coverage limits. If any of our third-party insurers fail, suddenly cancel our coverage or otherwise are unable to provide us with adequate insurance coverage, then our overall risk exposure and our operational expenses would increase and the management of our business operations would be disrupted. In addition, there can be no assurance that any of our existing insurance coverage will be renewable upon the expiration of the coverage period or that future coverage will be affordable at the required limits.

If we do not have adequate indemnification for our services related to nuclear materials, it could adversely affect our business and financial condition.

We provide services to the nuclear energy industry in the ongoing maintenance and modification, as well as the decontamination and decommissioning, of nuclear energy plants. Indemnification provisions under the Price-Anderson Act available to nuclear energy plant operators and contractors do not apply to all liabilities that we might incur while performing services as a radioactive materials cleanup contractor for the nuclear energy industry. If the Price-Anderson Act’s indemnification protection does not apply to our services or if our exposure occurs outside the U.S., our business and financial condition could be adversely affected either by our client’s refusal to retain us, by our inability to obtain commercially adequate insurance and indemnification, or by potentially significant monetary damages we may incur.

Our backlog of uncompleted projects under contract is subject to unexpected adjustments and cancellations and, thus may not accurately reflect future revenue and profits.

At June 30, 2020, our contracted backlog was approximately $19.6 billion, our awarded backlog was approximately $21.2 billion and our unconsolidated joint venture backlog was approximately $0.7 billion for a total backlog of $41.5 billion. Our contracted backlog includes revenue we expect to record in the future from signed contracts and, in the case of a public sector client, where the project has been funded. We reported transaction price allocated to remaining unsatisfied performance obligations (RUPO) of $19.1 billion, as described in Note 4, Revenue Recognition, in the notes to our consolidated financial statements. The most significant difference between our contracted backlog and RUPO is revenue related to service contracts that extend beyond the termination provisions of those contracts. Our contracted backlog includes revenues for service contracts expected to be earned over the term of that contract. Guidance for the calculation of RUPO requires us to assume the contract will be terminated at its earliest convenience, resulting in RUPO to be $0.5 billion lower than contracted backlog. Our awarded backlog includes revenue we expect to record in the future where we have been awarded the work, but the contractual agreement has not yet been signed. We cannot guarantee that future revenue will be realized from either category of backlog or, if realized, will result in profits. Many projects may remain in our backlog for an extended period of time because of the size or long-term nature of the contract. In addition, from time to time, projects are delayed, scaled back or canceled. These types of

Table of Contents

backlog reductions adversely affect the revenue and profits that we ultimately receive from contracts reflected in our backlog.

We have submitted claims to clients for work we performed beyond the initial scope of some of our contracts. If these clients do not approve these claims, our results of operations could be adversely impacted.

We typically have pending claims submitted under some of our contracts for payment of work performed beyond the initial contractual requirements for which we have already recorded revenue. In general, we cannot guarantee that such claims will be approved in whole, in part, or at all. Often, these claims can be the subject of lengthy arbitration or litigation proceedings, and it is difficult to accurately predict when these claims will be fully resolved. When these types of events occur and unresolved claims are pending, we have used working capital in projects to cover cost overruns pending the resolution of the relevant claims. If these claims are not approved, our revenue may be reduced in future periods.

In conducting our business, we depend on other contractors, subcontractors and equipment and material providers. If these parties fail to satisfy their obligations to us or other parties or if we are unable to maintain these relationships, our revenue, profitability and growth prospects could be adversely affected.

We depend on contractors, subcontractors and equipment and material providers in conducting our business. There is a risk that we may have disputes with our subcontractors arising from, among other things, the quality and timeliness of work performed by the subcontractor, customer concerns about the subcontractor, or our failure to extend existing task orders or issue new task orders under a subcontract. Also, to the extent that we cannot acquire equipment and materials at reasonable costs, or if the amount we are required to pay exceeds our estimates, our ability to complete a project in a timely fashion or at a profit may be impaired. In addition, if any of our subcontractors fail to deliver on a timely basis the agreed-upon supplies and/or perform the agreed-upon services, our ability to fulfill our obligations as a prime contractor may be jeopardized; we could be held responsible for such failures and/or we may be required to purchase the supplies or services from another source at a higher price. This may reduce the profit to be realized or result in a loss on a project for which the supplies or services are needed.

We also rely on relationships with other contractors when we act as their subcontractor or joint venture partner. Our future revenue and growth prospects could be adversely affected if other contractors eliminate or reduce their subcontracts or joint venture relationships with us, or if a government agency terminates or reduces these other contractors’ programs, does not award them new contracts or refuses to pay under a contract. In addition, due to “pay when paid” provisions that are common in subcontracts in many countries, including the U.S., we could experience delays in receiving payment if the prime contractor experiences payment delays.

If clients use our reports or other work product without appropriate disclaimers or in a misleading or incomplete manner, or if our reports or other work product are not in compliance with professional standards and other regulations, our business could be adversely affected.

The reports and other work product we produce for clients sometimes include projections, forecasts and other forward-looking statements. Such information by its nature is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, any of which could cause the information produced by us to ultimately prove inaccurate. While we include appropriate disclaimers in the reports that we prepare for our clients, once we produce such written work product, we do not always have the ability to control the manner in which our clients use such information. As a result, if our clients reproduce such information to solicit funds from investors for projects without appropriate disclaimers and the information proves to be incorrect, or if our clients reproduce such information for potential investors in a misleading or incomplete manner, our clients or such investors may threaten to or file suit against us for, among other things, securities law violations. For example, in August 2016, an affiliate entered into a settlement related to, among other things, alleged deficiencies in a traffic forecast. If we were found to be liable for any claims related to our client work product, our business could be adversely affected.

In addition, our reports and other work product may need to comply with professional standards, licensing requirements, securities regulations and other laws and rules governing the performance of professional services in the jurisdiction where the services are performed. We could be liable to third parties who use or rely upon our reports and

Table of Contents

other work product even if we are not contractually bound to those third parties. These events could in turn result in monetary damages and penalties.

Failure to adequately protect, maintain, or enforce our rights in our intellectual property may adversely limit our competitive position.

Our success depends, in part, upon our ability to protect our intellectual property. We rely on a combination of intellectual property policies and other contractual arrangements to protect much of our intellectual property where we do not believe that trademark, patent or copyright protection is appropriate or obtainable. Trade secrets are generally difficult to protect. Although our employees are subject to confidentiality obligations, this protection may be inadequate to deter or prevent misappropriation of our confidential information and/or the infringement of our patents and copyrights. Further, we may be unable to detect unauthorized use of our intellectual property or otherwise take appropriate steps to enforce our rights. Failure to adequately protect, maintain, or enforce our intellectual property rights may adversely limit our competitive position.

Negotiations with labor unions and possible work actions could divert management attention and disrupt operations. In addition, new collective bargaining agreements or amendments to agreements could increase our labor costs and operating expenses.

We regularly negotiate with labor unions and enter into collective bargaining agreements. The outcome of any future negotiations relating to union representation or collective bargaining agreements may not be favorable to us. We may reach agreements in collective bargaining that increase our operating expenses and lower our net income as a result of higher wages or benefit expenses. In addition, negotiations with unions could divert management attention and disrupt operations, which may adversely affect our results of operations. If we are unable to negotiate acceptable collective bargaining agreements, we may have to address the threat of union-initiated work actions, including strikes. Depending on the nature of the threat or the type and duration of any work action, these actions could disrupt our operations and adversely affect our operating results.

Our charter documents contain provisions that may delay, defer or prevent a change of control.

Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire control of us, even if the change in control would be beneficial to stockholders. These provisions include the following:

●

ability of our Board of Directors to authorize the issuance of preferred stock in series without stockholder approval;

●

vesting of exclusive authority in our Board of Directors to determine the size of the board (subject to limited exceptions) and to fill vacancies;

●

advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and nominations for election to our Board of Directors; and

●

restrictions on our stockholders from acting by written consent.

Changes in tax laws could increase our worldwide tax rate and materially affect our results of operations.

We are subject to tax laws in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Many international legislative and regulatory bodies have proposed and/or enacted legislation that could significantly impact how U.S. multinational corporations are taxed on foreign earnings. Due to the large scale of our U.S. and international business activities, many of these proposed and enacted changes to the taxation of our activities could increase our worldwide effective tax rate and harm results of operations.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Stock Repurchase Program

On September 21, 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors announced a new capital allocation policy that authorized the repurchase of up to $1.0 billion in AECOM common stock (the “Program”). Stock repurchases can be made through open market purchases or other methods, including pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 plan. The Company did not make any repurchases under the Program during the three months ended June 30, 2020. The maximum approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the Program is $760.0 million.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure

The Company does not act as the owner of any mines, but we may act as a mining operator as defined under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 where we may be a lessee of a mine, a person who operates, controls or supervises such mine, or an independent contractor performing services or construction of such mine. Information concerning mine safety violations or other regulatory matters required by Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K is included in Exhibit 95.

Item 5. Other Information

None

Item 6. Exhibits

The following documents are filed as Exhibits to the Report:


			Incorporated by Reference
			(Exchange Act Filings Located
			at File No. 0-52423)
Exhibit				Filing	Filed
Numbers	Description	Form	Exhibit	Date	Herewith
2.1	Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of October 12, 2019, by and between AECOM and Maverick Purchaser Sub, LLC	Form 8-K	2.1	10/17/2019

3.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation	Form 10-K	3.1	11/21/2011

3.2	Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation	Form S-4	3.2	8/1/2014

3.3	Certificate of Correction of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation	Form 10-K	3.3	11/17/2014

3.4	Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation	Form 8-K	3.1	1/9/2015

3.5	Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation	Form 8-K	3.1	3/3/2017

3.6	Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company	Form 8-K	3.2	11/15/2018

10.1#	Letter Agreement between AECOM and W. Troy Rudd dated June 13, 2020				X

Table of Contents


			Incorporated by Reference
			(Exchange Act Filings Located
			at File No. 0-52423)
Exhibit				Filing	Filed
Numbers	Description	Form	Exhibit	Date	Herewith
10.2#	Letter Agreement between AECOM and Lara Poloni dated June 13, 2020				X

10.3#	Senior Leadership Severance Plan				X

31.1	Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002				X

31.2	Certification of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002				X

32	Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002				X

95	Mine Safety Disclosure				X

101	The following financial statements from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2020 were formatted in iXBRL (Inline eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iv) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, (v) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text and including detailed tags.				X

104	The cover page from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2020, formatted in Inline XBRL				X

#Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	AECOM


Date: August 5, 2020	By:	/S/ W. TROY RUDD
		W. Troy Rudd
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer