AEMETIS, INC - Quarter Report: 2017 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
———————
FORM 10-Q
———————
☑ QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended: September 30,
2017
Or
☐ TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the transition period
from
to
Commission File Number: 001-36475
———————
AEMETIS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its
charter)
———————
Nevada
|
26-1407544
|
(State or other jurisdiction
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
of incorporation or organization)
|
Identification No.)
|
20400 Stevens Creek Blvd., Suite 700
Cupertino, CA 95014
(Address of Principal Executive Offices, including zip
code)
(408) 213-0940
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
———————
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Yes ☑
No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter)
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes ☑
No ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting
company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of
“large accelerated filer,” “accelerated
filer”, “smaller reporting company” and "emerging
growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large accelerated filer
|
☐
|
Accelerated filer
|
☐
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting
company)
|
Smaller reporting company
|
☒
|
|
|
Emerging
growth company
|
☐
|
If an
emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant
has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No
☑
The
number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock
on October 31, 2017 was 19,822,962 shares.
AEMETIS, INC.
FORM 10-Q
Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2017
INDEX
PART I--FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
||
Item 1 Financial Statements.
|
4
|
|
Item 2.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations.
|
23
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk.
|
33
|
Item 4.
|
Controls and Procedures.
|
34
|
PART II--OTHER INFORMATION
|
||
Item 1.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
35
|
Item 1A.
|
Risk Factors.
|
35
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds.
|
35
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
|
36
|
Item 4.
|
Mine Safety Disclosures.
|
36
|
Item 5.
|
Other Information.
|
36
|
Item 6.
|
Exhibits.
|
36
|
Signatures
|
|
37
|
ii
On one or more occasions, we may make forward-looking statements in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including statements regarding
our assumptions, projections, expectations, targets, intentions or
beliefs about future events or other statements that are not
historical facts. Forward-looking statements in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q include, without limitation, statements
regarding management’s plans; trends in demand for renewable
fuels; trends in market conditions with respect to prices for
inputs for our products versus prices for our products; our ability
to leverage approved feedstock pathways; our ability to leverage
our location and infrastructure; our ability to incorporate
lower-cost, non-food advanced biofuels feedstock at the Keyes
plant; our ability to adopt value-add by-product processing
systems; our ability to expand into alternative markets for
biodiesel and its by-products, including continuing to expand our
sales into international markets; the impact of changes in
regulatory policies on our performance, including the Indian
government’s recent changes to tax policies, diesel prices
and related subsidies; our ability to continue to develop new, and
to maintain and protect new and existing, intellectual property
rights; our ability to adopt, develop and commercialize new
technologies; our ability to refinance our senior debt on more
commercial terms or at all; our ability to continue to fund
operations and our future sources of liquidity and capital
resources; our ability to sell additional notes under our EB-5 note
program and our expectations regarding the release of funds from
escrow under our EB-5 note program; our ability to improve margins;
and our ability to raise additional capital. Words or phrases such
as “anticipates,” “may,”
“will,” “should,” “believes,”
“estimates,” “expects,”
“intends,” “plans,” “predicts,”
“projects,” “targets,” “will likely
result,” “will continue” or similar expressions
are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements are based on current assumptions and
predictions and are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties.
Actual results or events could differ materially from those set
forth or implied by such forward-looking statements and related
assumptions due to certain factors, including, without limitation,
the risks set forth under the caption “Risk Factors”
below, which are incorporated herein by reference as well as those
business risks and factors described elsewhere in this report and
in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “SEC”), including without limitation, our most
recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.
iii
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1 - Financial Statements.
AEMETIS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands except for par value)
|
September 30,
2017
|
December 31,
2016
|
Assets
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$1,749
|
$1,486
|
Accounts
receivable
|
2,199
|
1,557
|
Inventories
|
5,742
|
3,241
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
2,717
|
555
|
Other
current assets
|
233
|
206
|
Total
current assets
|
12,640
|
7,045
|
|
|
|
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
79,360
|
66,370
|
Intangible
assets, net of accumulated amortization of $485 and $424,
respectively
|
1,239
|
1,300
|
Other
assets
|
3,092
|
3,095
|
Total
assets
|
$96,331
|
$77,810
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders' deficit
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
$9,367
|
$7,842
|
Current
portion of long term debt
|
1,822
|
2,027
|
Short
term borrowings
|
12,737
|
9,382
|
Mandatorily
redeemable Series B convertible preferred stock
|
2,920
|
2,844
|
Accrued
property taxes
|
3,658
|
2,648
|
Other
current liabilities
|
3,312
|
2,473
|
Total
current liabilities
|
33,816
|
27,216
|
Long
term liabilities:
|
|
|
Senior
secured notes
|
70,865
|
61,631
|
EB-5
notes
|
34,000
|
33,000
|
GAFI
secured and revolving notes
|
23,373
|
-
|
Long
term subordinated debt
|
5,786
|
5,674
|
Other
long term liabilities
|
37
|
102
|
Total
long term liabilities
|
134,061
|
100,407
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
deficit:
|
|
|
Series
B convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 7,235 authorized;
1,323 and 1,328 shares issued and outstanding each period,
respectively (aggregate liquidation preference of $3,969 and $3,984
respectively)
|
1
|
1
|
Common
stock, $0.001 par value; 40,000 authorized; 19,823 and 19,858
shares issued and outstanding, respectively
|
20
|
20
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
84,128
|
83,441
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(151,911)
|
(129,887)
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(3,077)
|
(3,388)
|
Total
stockholders' deficit attributable to Aemetis, Inc.
|
(70,839)
|
(49,813)
|
Non-controlling
interest - GAFI
|
(707)
|
-
|
Total
stockholders' deficit
|
(71,546)
|
(49,813)
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders' deficit
|
$96,331
|
$77,810
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial
statements.
4
AEMETIS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
COMPREHENSIVE
LOSS
(Unaudited, in thousands except for earnings per
share)
|
For the three months ended
September 30,
|
For the nine months ended
September 30,
|
||
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
Revenues
|
$38,935
|
$39,377
|
$111,273
|
$105,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of goods sold
|
36,980
|
35,711
|
108,200
|
98,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit
|
1,955
|
3,666
|
3,073
|
7,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research
and development expenses
|
1,876
|
87
|
2,072
|
290
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
3,182
|
3,222
|
9,739
|
9,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income (loss)
|
(3,103)
|
357
|
(8,738)
|
(1,717)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
(income) expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
rate expense
|
3,867
|
3,046
|
9,873
|
8,679
|
Amortization
expense
|
1,265
|
1,425
|
4,112
|
4,269
|
Other
(income) expense
|
(18)
|
(19)
|
2
|
(480)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
before income taxes
|
(8,217)
|
(4,095)
|
(22,725)
|
(14,185)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
tax expense
|
-
|
-
|
6
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(8,217)
|
$(4,095)
|
$(22,731)
|
$(14,191)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less:
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest
|
(707)
|
-
|
(707)
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss attributable to Aemetis, Inc.
|
$(7,510)
|
$(4,095)
|
$(22,024)
|
$(14,191)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
(87)
|
56
|
311
|
(50)
|
Comprehensive
loss
|
$(8,304)
|
$(4,039)
|
$(22,420)
|
$(14,241)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share attributable to Aemetis,
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$(0.38)
|
$(0.21)
|
$(1.11)
|
$(0.72)
|
Diluted
|
$(0.38)
|
$(0.21)
|
$(1.11)
|
$(0.72)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
19,804
|
19,833
|
19,760
|
19,741
|
Diluted
|
19,804
|
19,833
|
19,760
|
19,741
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial
statements.
5
AEMETIS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited, in thousands)
|
For the nine months ended
September 30,
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(22,731)
|
$(14,191)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities:
|
|
|
Share-based
compensation
|
800
|
573
|
Depreciation
|
3,471
|
3,523
|
Debt
related amortization expense
|
4,112
|
4,269
|
Intangibles
and other amortization expense
|
98
|
95
|
Change
in fair value of warrant liability
|
3
|
34
|
Loss
on sale/disposal of assets
|
-
|
11
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
(932)
|
150
|
Inventories
|
(2,456)
|
795
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
89
|
82
|
Other
current and long-term assets
|
(41)
|
(175)
|
Accounts
payable
|
1,507
|
(1,315)
|
Accrued
interest expense and fees, net of payments
|
8,091
|
5,910
|
Other
liabilities
|
1,633
|
683
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
(6,356)
|
444
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
Capital
expenditures
|
(681)
|
(479)
|
|
|
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(681)
|
(479)
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
Proceeds
from borrowings
|
13,146
|
8,535
|
Repayments
of borrowings
|
(8,889)
|
(8,091)
|
GAFI
proceeds from borrowings
|
2,810
|
-
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
7,067
|
444
|
|
|
|
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
233
|
(40)
|
Net
cash and cash equivalents increase for period
|
263
|
369
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
1,486
|
283
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$1,749
|
$652
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosures of cash flow information, cash paid:
|
|
|
Interest
paid
|
$1,875
|
$2,518
|
Income
taxes paid
|
6
|
6
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information, non-cash
transactions:
|
|
|
Subordinated
debt extension fees added to debt
|
680
|
680
|
Fair
value of warrants issued to subordinated debt holders
|
321
|
578
|
Repurchase
of common stock added to TEC promissory note
|
451
|
-
|
Senior
debt extension and waiver fees added to debt
|
4,446
|
4,940
|
TEC
promissory note fees and fees for Goodland transaction
|
1,169
|
-
|
Settlement
of accounts payable through transfer of equipment
|
-
|
66
|
GAFI
plant, property & equipment acquired
|
15,431
|
-
|
Payment
of TEC bridge loan added to GAFI Revolving loan
|
3,669
|
-
|
Prepaid
interest on GAFI Term loan
|
2,250
|
-
|
The accompanying
notes are an integral part of the financial
statements.
6
AEMETIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited, tabular data in thousands except par value and per
share data)
1.
Nature of Activities and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
Nature of Activities.
Headquartered in Cupertino, California, Aemetis is an advanced
renewable fuels and biochemicals company focused on the
acquisition, development and commercialization of innovative
technologies that replace traditional petroleum-based products
through the conversion of second-generation ethanol and biodiesel
plants into advanced biorefineries. Founded in 2006, the
Company owns and operates a 60 million gallon per year ethanol
production facility in the California Central Valley near Modesto
where it manufactures and produces ethanol, wet distillers’
grains (“WDG”), condensed distillers solubles
(“CDS”) and distillers’ corn oil. The
Company also owns and operates a 50 million gallon per year
renewable chemical and advanced fuel production facility on the
East Coast of India producing high quality distilled biodiesel and
refined glycerin for customers in India and Europe. It also
operates a research and development laboratory and holds a
portfolio of patents and related technology licenses for the
production of renewable fuels and biochemicals.
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation. These consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of Aemetis, Inc., a
Nevada corporation, and its wholly owned subsidiaries
(collectively, “Aemetis” or the “Company”).
Additionally, we consolidate all entities in which we have a
controlling financial interest. A controlling financial interest is
usually obtained through ownership of a majority of the voting
interests. However, there are situations in which an enterprise is
required to consolidate a variable interest entity (VIE), even
though the enterprise does not own a majority of the voting
interests. An enterprise must consolidate a VIE if the enterprise
is the primary beneficiary of the VIE. The primary beneficiary is
the party that has both the power to direct the activities of the
VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic
performance, and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to
receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant
to the VIE.
In July 2017, we closed on a transaction with Goodland Advanced
Fuels, Inc. (GAFI). Upon application of consolidation guidance in
ASC 810 Consolidation, we
determined that GAFI is a variable interest entity and Aemetis,
Inc. is the primary beneficiary. Accordingly, the consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of GAFI (see Note
6).
All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation including any transactions between GAFI and Aemetis,
Inc. The accompanying consolidated condensed balance sheet as of
September 30, 2017, the consolidated condensed statements of
operations and comprehensive loss for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, and the consolidated condensed
statements of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30,
2017 and 2016 are unaudited. The consolidated condensed balance
sheet as of December 31, 2016 was derived from the 2016 audited
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. The
consolidated condensed financial statements in this report should
be read in conjunction with the 2016 audited consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2016.
The accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements have
been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP) and pursuant to the rules
and regulations of the SEC.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in
financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have
been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and
regulations.
7
AEMETIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited, tabular data in thousands except par value and per
share data)
In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim consolidated
condensed financial statements for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2017 and 2016 have been prepared on the same basis as
the audited consolidated statements as of December 31, 2016 and
reflect all adjustments, consisting primarily of normal recurring
adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of its statement
of financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The
results of operations for the three and nine months ended September
30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results
for any subsequent quarter, for the full fiscal year or any future
periods.
Use of Estimates. The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, revenues, and expenses during the reporting period. To
the extent there are material differences between these estimates
and actual results, the Company’s consolidated financial
statements will be affected.
Revenue Recognition. The
Company recognizes revenue when there is persuasive evidence of an
arrangement, delivery has occurred, the price is fixed or
determinable and collection is reasonably assured. The Company
records revenues based upon the gross amounts billed to its
customers. Revenue from nonmonetary transactions, principally
in-kind by-products received in exchange for material processing
where the by-product is contemplated by contract to provide value,
is recognized at the quoted market price of those goods received or
by-products.
Cost of Goods Sold. Cost of
goods sold includes those costs directly associated with the
production of revenues, such as raw material consumed, factory
overhead and other direct production costs. During periods of idle
plant capacity, costs otherwise charged to cost of goods sold are
reclassified to selling, general and administrative
expense.
Accounts Receivable. The
Company sells ethanol, WDG, CDS, and distillers’ corn oil
through third-party marketing arrangements generally without
requiring collateral. The Company sells biodiesel, glycerin, and
processed natural oils to a variety of customers and may require
advance payment based on the size and creditworthiness of the
customer. Accounts receivables consist of product sales made to
large creditworthy customers. Trade accounts receivable are
presented at original invoice amount, net of any allowance for
doubtful accounts.
The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for
balances that appear to have specific collection issues. The
collection process is based on the age of the invoice and requires
attempted contacts with the customer at specified intervals. If,
after a specified number of days, the Company has been unsuccessful
in its collection efforts, a bad debt allowance is recorded for the
balance in question. Delinquent accounts receivable are charged
against the allowance for doubtful accounts once un-collectability
has been determined. The factors considered in reaching this
determination are the apparent financial condition of the customer
and the Company’s success in contacting and negotiating with
the customer. If the financial condition of the Company’s
customers were to deteriorate, additional allowances may be
required. We did not reserve any balance for allowance for doubtful
accounts as of September 30, 2017 and December 31,
2016.
Inventories. Finished goods and
work-in-process are valued using methods, which approximate the
lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or net realizable value (NRV).
Distillers’ grains and related products are stated at NRV. In
the valuation of inventories, NRV is determined as estimated
selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably
predictable costs of completion, disposal, and
transportation.
8
AEMETIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited, tabular data in thousands except par value and per
share data)
Property, Plant and Equipment.
Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated
depreciation after assets are placed in service and are comprised
primarily of buildings, furniture, machinery, equipment, land, and
the plants in Keyes, California, Goodland, Kansas and Kakinada,
India. As part of our variable interest entity, the plant in Kansas
is partially completed and is not ready for operation; hence, we
are not depreciating these assets yet. Otherwise, it is the
Company’s policy to depreciate capital assets over their
estimated useful lives using the straight-line
method.
The Company evaluates the recoverability of long-lived assets with
finite lives in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) Subtopic 360-10-35 Property, Plant and
Equipment –Subsequent
Measurements, which requires
recognition of impairment of long-lived assets whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset may not be recoverable. When events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not
be recoverable, based on estimated undiscounted cash flows, the
impairment loss would be measured as the difference between the
carrying amount of the assets and its estimated fair
value.
Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) per Share. Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by
dividing net income or loss attributable to common shareholders by
the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the
period. Diluted net income (loss) per share reflects the dilution
of common stock equivalents such as options, convertible preferred
stock, debt and warrants to the extent the impact is dilutive. As
the Company incurred net losses for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2017 and 2016, potentially dilutive securities have
been excluded from the diluted net loss per share computations, as
their effect would be anti-dilutive.
The following table shows the number of potentially dilutive shares
excluded from the diluted net income (loss) per share calculation
as of September 30, 2017 and 2016:
|
September 30,
2017
|
September 30,
2016
|
|
|
|
Series
B preferred (post split basis)
|
132
|
133
|
Common
stock options and warrants
|
2,554
|
1,965
|
Debt
with conversion feature at $30 per share of common
stock
|
1,194
|
861
|
Total
number of potentially dilutive shares excluded from the diluted net
loss per share calculation
|
3,880
|
2,959
|
Comprehensive Loss. ASC
220 Comprehensive Income
requires that an enterprise report, by
major components and as a single total, the change in its net
assets from non-owner sources. The Company’s other
comprehensive income (loss) and accumulated other comprehensive
loss consists solely of cumulative currency translation adjustments
resulting from the translation of the financial statements of its
foreign subsidiary. The investment in this subsidiary is considered
indefinitely invested overseas, and as a result, deferred income
taxes are not recorded related to the currency translation
adjustments.
Foreign Currency Translation/Transactions. Assets and liabilities of the Company’s
non-U.S. subsidiary that operates in a local currency environment,
where that local currency is the functional currency, are
translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the
balance sheet date, with the resulting translation adjustments
directly recorded to a separate component of accumulated other
comprehensive loss. Income and expense accounts are translated at
average exchange rates. Gains and losses from other foreign
currency transactions are recorded in other income
(expense).
9
AEMETIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited, tabular data in thousands except par value and per
share data)
Operating Segments. Operating
segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which
separate financial information is available that is evaluated
regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or decision-making
group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing
performance. Aemetis recognizes two reportable geographic operating
segments: “North America” and
“India.”
The “North America” operating segment includes the
Company’s 60 million gallons per year capacity Keyes plant in
Keyes, California, the GAFI plant in Goodland, Kansas and the
research and development facility.
The “India” operating segment encompasses the
Company’s 50 million gallon per year capacity biodiesel plant
in Kakinada, India, its administrative offices in Hyderabad, India,
and the holding companies in Nevada and Mauritius.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments. The carrying amount of
cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable
approximate their estimated fair values due to the short-term
maturities of those financial instruments. These financial
instruments are considered Level 1 measurements under the fair
value hierarchy. Due to the unique terms of our notes payable and
lines of credit and the financial condition of the Company, the
fair value of the debt is not readily determinable.
Share-Based Compensation. The Company recognizes share-based
compensation expense in accordance with ASC 718 Stock Compensation, requiring the
Company to recognize expense related to the estimated fair value of
the Company’s share-based compensation awards at the time the
awards are granted, adjusted to reflect only those shares that are
expected to vest.
Commitments and Contingencies. The Company records and/or
discloses commitments and contingencies in accordance with ASC 450
Contingencies. ASC 450
applies to an existing condition, situation or set of circumstances
involving uncertainty as to possible loss that will ultimately be
resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to
occur.
Debt Modification Accounting.
The Company evaluates amendments to its debt in accordance with ASC
470-50 Debt
– Modification and Extinguishments for modification and extinguishment accounting.
This evaluation includes comparing the net present value of cash
flows of the new debt to the old debt to determine if changes
greater than 10 percent occurred. In instances where the net
present value of future cash flows changed more than 10 percent,
the Company applies extinguishment accounting and determines the
fair value of its debt based on factors available to the
Company.
Convertible Instruments. The
Company evaluates the impacts of convertible instruments based on
the underlying conversion features. Convertible instruments are
evaluated for treatment as derivatives that could be bifurcated and
recorded separately. Any beneficial conversion feature is recorded
based on the intrinsic value difference at the commitment
date.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued new guidance on the recognition of
revenue. The guidance stated that an entity should recognize
revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to
customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the
entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or
services. The standard is effective for annual reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within
that reporting period. The Company’s adoption of this
accounting standard begins with the first quarter of fiscal year
2018. In March and April 2016, the FASB issued further revenue
recognition guidance amending principal vs. agent considerations
regarding whether an entity should recognize revenue to depict the
transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount
that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be
entitled in exchange for those goods and services. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this accounting
standard update on its consolidated results of operations and
financial condition and will be providing guidance in its Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2017.
10
AEMETIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited, tabular data in thousands except par value and per
share data)
2.
Inventory
Inventory consists of the following:
|
September 30,
2017
|
December 31,
2016
|
Raw
materials
|
$2,306
|
$1,044
|
Work-in-progress
|
1,946
|
1,360
|
Finished
goods
|
1,490
|
837
|
Total
inventories
|
$5,742
|
$3,241
|
3.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment consist of the
following:
|
September 30,
2017
|
December 31,
2016
|
Land
|
$2,734
|
$2,713
|
Plant
and buildings
|
82,390
|
81,755
|
Furniture
and fixtures
|
983
|
572
|
Machinery
and equipment
|
3,951
|
4,308
|
Construction
in progress
|
522
|
88
|
GAFI
property, plant & equipment
|
15,431
|
0
|
Total
gross property, plant & equipment
|
106,011
|
89,436
|
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
(26,651)
|
(23,066)
|
Total
net property, plant & equipment
|
$79,360
|
$66,370
|
Depreciation on the components of property, plant and equipment is
calculated using the straight-line method to allocate their
depreciable amounts over their estimated useful lives as
follows:
|
Years
|
Plant
and buildings
|
20 - 30
|
Machinery
and equipment
|
5 - 7
|
Furniture
and fixtures
|
3 - 5
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company
recorded depreciation expense of $1.2 million for each period. For
the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company
recorded depreciation expense of $3.5 million for each
period.
Management is required to evaluate these long-lived assets for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Management
determined there was no impairment of long-lived assets during the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and
2016.
11
AEMETIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited, tabular data in thousands except par value and per
share data)
4.
Debt
Debt consists of the following:
|
September 30,
2017
|
December 31,
2016
|
Third
Eye Capital term notes
|
$6,832
|
$6,577
|
Third
Eye Capital revolving credit facility
|
32,778
|
24,927
|
Third
Eye Capital revenue participation term notes
|
11,473
|
11,042
|
Third
Eye Capital acquisition term notes
|
19,782
|
19,085
|
Cilion
shareholder seller notes payable
|
5,786
|
5,674
|
Subordinated
notes
|
8,445
|
7,565
|
EB-5
long term promissory notes
|
35,822
|
35,027
|
Unsecured
working capital loans
|
4,292
|
1,817
|
GAFI
Term and Revolving loans
|
23,373
|
-
|
Total debt
|
148,583
|
111,714
|
Less
current portion of debt
|
14,559
|
11,409
|
Total long term debt
|
$134,024
|
$100,305
|
Third Eye Capital Note Purchase Agreement
On July 6, 2012, Aemetis, Inc. and Aemetis Advanced Fuels Keyes,
Inc. (“AAFK”), entered into an Amended and Restated
Note Purchase Agreement with Third Eye Capital (the “Note
Purchase Agreement”). Pursuant to the Note Purchase
Agreement, Third Eye Capital extended credit in the form of (i)
senior secured term loans in an aggregate principal amount of
approximately $7.2 million to replace existing notes held by Third
Eye Capital (the “Term Notes”); (ii) senior secured
revolving loans in an aggregate principal amount of $18.0 million
(“Revolving Credit Facility”); (iii) senior secured
term loans in the principal amount of $10.0 million to convert the
prior revenue participation agreement to a note (“Revenue
Participation Term Notes”); and (iv) senior secured term
loans in an aggregate principal amount of $15.0 million
(“Acquisition Term Notes”) used to fund the cash
portion of the acquisition of Cilion, Inc. (the Term Notes,
Revolving Credit Facility, Revenue Participation Term Notes and
Acquisition Term Notes are referred to herein collectively as the
Original Third Eye Capital Notes). After this financing
transaction, Third Eye Capital obtained sufficient equity ownership
in the Company to be considered a related party. The Original Third
Eye Capital Notes have a maturity date of April 1,
2018.
On January 31, 2017, a Promissory Note (the “January 2017
Note”, together with the Original Third Eye Capital Notes,
the “Third Eye Capital Notes”) for $2.1 million was
advanced by Third Eye Capital to Aemetis, Inc., as a short-term
credit facility for working capital and other general corporate
purposes with an interest rate of 14% per annum maturing on the
earlier of (a) receipt of proceeds from any financing, refinancing,
or other similar transaction, (b) extension of credit by payee, as
lender or as agent on behalf of certain lenders, to the Company or
its affiliates, or (c) May 30, 2017. In addition, as part of the
January 2017 Note agreement, Aemetis used $0.5 million of the total
proceeds to buy back 275 thousand common shares that were held by
Third Eye Capital. In consideration of the January 2017 Note, $133
thousand of the total proceeds were paid to Third Eye Capital as
financing charges. As of June 30, 2017, the outstanding balance on
the January 2017 Note was $2.1 million. On July 10, 2017, the
January 2017 Note was paid in full.
On March 1, 2017, Third Eye Capital agreed to Amendment No. 13 to
the Note Purchase Agreement to: (i) extend the maturity date of the
Third Eye Capital Notes to April 1, 2018 in exchange for a 5%
extension fee consisting of adding $3.1 million to the outstanding
principal balance of the Note Purchase Agreement and allowing for
the further extension of the maturity date of the Third Eye Capital
Notes to April 1, 2019, at the Company’s election, for an
additional extension fee of 5% of the then outstanding Third Eye
Capital Notes outstanding balance, (ii) waive the free cash flow
financial covenant under the Note Purchase Agreement for the three
months ended December 31, 2016, (iii) provide that such covenant
will be deleted prospectively from the Note Purchase Agreement,
(iv) waive the default under the Note Purchase Agreement relating
to indebtedness outstanding to Laird Cagan and (v) waive the
covenant under the Note Purchase Agreement to permit the Company to
pay off the defaulted Laird Cagan subordinated note by issuing
stock. The borrowers agreed to use their best efforts to close the
transaction to purchase assets in Goodland, Kansas from Third Eye
Capital as described in a non-binding offer to purchase letter
between an affiliate of the Company and Third Eye Capital, which
closed on July 10, 2017. As consideration for such amendment and
waiver, the borrowers agreed to pay Third Eye Capital an amendment
and waiver fee of $750 thousand to be added to the outstanding
principal balance of the Revolving Credit Facility. As a result of
the extension of the maturity date in Amendment No. 13, the Third
Eye Capital Notes are classified as non-current debt. We evaluated
the Amendment of the Notes and applied modification accounting
treatment in accordance with ASC 470-50 Debt – Modification and
Extinguishment.
12
AEMETIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited, tabular data in thousands except par value and per
share data)
On April 28, 2017, a Promissory Note (the “April 2017
Note”, and together with the Original Third Eye Capital
Notes, the “Third Eye Capital Notes”) for $1.5 million
was advanced by Third Eye Capital to Aemetis, Inc., as a short-term
credit facility for working capital and other general corporate
purposes with an interest rate of 14% per annum maturing on the
earliest of (a) closing of the Financing, (b) receipt of proceeds
from any financing, refinancing or other similar transaction, (c)
extension of credit by the Lender, or Agent on behalf of certain
lenders or the Noteholders, to the Debtors or their affiliates, and
(d) June 15, 2017. In addition, $1.0 million of this note
represents fees payable by Goodland Advanced Fuels, Inc. upon the
closing of the Goodland transaction. On July 10, 2017, the April
2017 Note was paid in full and the fees payable by Goodland
Advanced Fuels, Inc., were paid.
Terms of Third Eye Capital Notes
A.
Term
Notes. As of September 30, 2017, the Company had $6.8
million in principal and interest outstanding under the Term Notes,
net of unamortized fair value discounts of $0.2 million. The Term
Notes mature on April 1, 2018. Interest on the Term Notes accrues
at 14% per annum.
B.
Revolving
Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility accrues interest at
the prime rate plus 13.75% (18.00% as of September 30, 2017),
payable monthly in arrears. The Revolving Credit Facility matures
on April 1, 2018. As of September 30, 2017, AAFK had $32.8 million
in principal and interest outstanding, net of unamortized debt
issuance costs of $0.8 million on the Revolving Credit Facility. No
amounts remained for future draw on the Revolving Credit
Facility.
C.
Revenue
Participation Term Notes. The Revenue Participation Term Note bears interest
at 5% per annum and matures on April 1, 2018. As of September 30,
2017, AAFK had $11.5 million in principal and interest outstanding,
net of unamortized discounts of $0.3 million, on the Revenue
Participation Term Note.
D.
Acquisition
Term Notes. The Acquisition Term Notes accrue interest at the
prime rate plus 10.75% (15.00% per annum as of September 30, 2017)
and mature on April 1, 2018. As of September 30, 2017, Aemetis
Facility Keyes, Inc. had $19.8 million in principal and interest
outstanding, net of unamortized discounts of $0.5 million, on the
Acquisition Term Notes.
E.
January
2017 Note. The January 2017
Note accrued interest at 14% and matured on May 30, 2017, at which
time it started accruing interest at 20% until the outstanding
balance of the January 2017 Note of $2.1 million was paid on July
10, 2017.
F.
April 2017
Note. The April 2017 Note
accrued interest at 14% and matured on June 15, 2017, at which time
it started accruing interest at 20% until the outstanding balance
of the April 2017 Note of $1.5 million was paid on July 10,
2017.
The
Company can extend the maturity date of the Term Notes, Revolving
Credit Facility, Revenue Participation Notes, and Acquisition Term
Notes to April 2019. As a condition to any such extension, the
Company would be required to pay a fee of 5% of the carrying value
of the debt. By this ability to extend the maturity at the
Company’s will, the Third Eye Capital Notes are classified as
non-current debt.
The Third Eye Capital Notes contain various covenants, including
but not limited to, debt to plant value ratio, minimum production
requirements, and restrictions on capital
expenditures.
The Third Eye Capital Notes are secured by first priority liens on
all real and personal property of, and assignment of proceeds from
government grants and guarantees from Aemetis, Inc. The Third Eye
Capital Notes contain cross-collateral and cross-default
provisions. McAfee Capital, LLC (“McAfee Capital”),
owned by Eric McAfee, the Company’s Chairman and CEO,
provided a guaranty of payment and performance secured by all of
its Company shares. In addition, Eric McAfee provided a blanket
lien on substantially all of his personal assets, and McAfee
Capital provided a guarantee for $8.0 million.
13
AEMETIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited, tabular data in thousands except par value and per
share data)
Cilion shareholder seller notes payable. In connection with the Company’s merger
with Cilion, Inc., on July 6, 2012, the Company issued $5.0 million
in notes payable to Cilion shareholders as merger consideration,
subordinated to the senior secured Third Eye Capital Notes. The
liability bears interest at 3% per annum and is due and payable
after the Third Eye Capital Notes have been paid in full. As of
September 30, 2017, Aemetis Facility Keyes, Inc. had $5.8 million
in principal and interest outstanding under the Cilion shareholder
seller notes payable.
Subordinated Notes. On January
6 and January 9, 2012, AAFK entered into Note and Warrant Purchase
Agreements with two accredited investors pursuant to which it
issued $0.9 million and $2.5 million in original notes to the
investors (Subordinated Notes). The Subordinated Notes mature every
six months. Upon maturity, the notes are generally extended with a
fee of 10% added to the balance outstanding plus issuance of
warrants exercisable at $0.01 with a two-year term. Interest is due
at maturity. Neither AAFK nor Aemetis may make any principal
payments under the Subordinated Notes until all loans made by Third
Eye Capital to AAFK are paid in full.
Interest is due at maturity. Neither AAFK nor Aemetis may make any
principal payments under the Subordinated Notes until all loans
made by Third Eye Capital to AAFK are paid in full.
On January 1, 2017, the Subordinated Notes were amended to extend
the maturity date until the earlier of (i) June 30, 2017; (ii)
completion of an equity financing by AAFK or Aemetis in an amount
of not less than $25.0 million; or (iii) after the occurrence of an
Event of Default, including failure to pay interest or principal
when due and breaches of note covenants. A 10% cash extension fee
was paid by adding the fee to the balance of the new note and
warrants to purchase 113 thousand shares of common stock were
granted with a term of two years and an exercise price of $0.01 per
share. We evaluated the January 1, 2017 amendment and the
refinancing terms of the notes and applied modification accounting
treatment in accordance with ASC 470-50 Debt – Modification and
Extinguishment.
On July 1, 2017, the Subordinated Notes were amended to extend the
maturity date until the earlier of (i) December 31, 2017; (ii)
completion of an equity financing by AAFK or Aemetis in an amount
of not less than $25.0 million; or (iii) after the occurrence of an
Event of Default, including failure to pay interest or principal
when due and breaches of note covenants. A 10% cash extension fee
was paid by adding the fee to the balance of the new note and
warrants to purchase 113 thousand shares of common stock were
granted with a term of two years and an exercise price of $0.01 per
share. We evaluated the July 1, 2017 amendment and the refinancing
terms of the notes and applied modification accounting treatment in
accordance with ASC 470-50 Debt – Modification and
Extinguishment.
On January 14, 2013, Laird Cagan, a related party, loaned $0.1
million through a promissory note maturing on December 31, 2016
with a five percent annualized interest rate and the right to
exercise 5 thousand warrants exercisable at $0.01 per
share.
At September 30, 2017, the Company owed, in aggregate, the amount
of $8.4 million in principal and interest net of $0.3 million in
debt issuance costs under the Subordinated Notes.
EB-5 long-term promissory notes. EB-5 is a U.S. government program authorized by
the Immigration and Nationality Act designed to foster
employment-based visa preference for immigrant investors to
encourage the flow of capital into the U.S. economy and to promote
employment of U.S. workers. The Company entered into a Note
Purchase Agreement dated March 4, 2011, (as further amended on
January 19, 2012 and July 24, 2012) with Advanced BioEnergy,
LP, a California limited partnership authorized as a Regional
Center to receive EB-5 investments, for the issuance of up to 72
subordinated convertible promissory notes (the “EB-5
Notes”) bearing interest at 3%, with each note in the
principal amount of $0.5 million and due and payable four years
from the date of each note, for a total aggregate principal amount
of up to $36.0 million (the “EB-5 Phase I funding”).
The EB-5 Notes are convertible after three years at a conversion
price of $30 per share.
14
AEMETIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited, tabular data in thousands except par value and per
share data)
Advanced BioEnergy, LP arranges investments with foreign investors,
who each make loans to the Keyes plant in increments of $0.5
million. As of September 30, 2017, the Company has sold an
aggregate principal amount of $36.0 million of EB-5 Notes under the
EB-5 Phase I funding since 2012, of which $34.5 million have been
released from the escrow account to the Company, with $1.0 million
remaining in escrow and $0.5 million to be funded to escrow. As of
September 30, 2017, $34.5 million in principal and $1.3 million in
accrued interest remained outstanding.
On October 16, 2016, the Company launched its EB-5 Phase II
funding, with plans to issue $50.0 million in additional EB-5 Notes
on substantially similar terms and conditions as those issued under
the Company’s EB-5 Phase I funding to refinance indebtedness
and capital expenditures of Aemetis, Inc.
Unsecured working capital loans. In November 2008, the Company entered into an
operating agreement with Secunderabad Oils Limited
(“Secunderabad Oils”). Under this agreement,
Secunderabad Oils agreed to provide the Company with working
capital, on an as needed basis, to fund the purchase of feedstock
and other raw materials for its Kakinada biodiesel facility.
Working capital advances bear interest at the actual bank-borrowing
rate of Secunderabad Oils of fifteen percent (15%). In return, the
Company agreed to pay Secunderabad Oils an amount equal to 30% of
the plant’s monthly net operating profit and recognized these
as operational support charges in the financials. In the event that
the Company’s biodiesel facility operates at a loss,
Secunderabad Oils owes the Company 30% of the losses. Either party
can terminate the agreement at any time without penalty. On January
1, 2016, Secunderabad Oils suspended the agreement to use any funds
provided under the agreement to buy feedstock until commodity
prices returned to economically viable levels. On June 1, 2016, the
agreement was reinitiated on the terms described above. On July 15,
2017, the agreement with Secunderabad Oils was amended to provide
the working capital funds for British Petroleum business operations
(“BP Operations”) in the form of inter-corporate
deposit for an amount of approximately $2.3 million for a period of
95 days at 14.75% per annum interest rate. The Secunderabad Oils
has a second priority lien on the assets of the Kakinada biodiesel
facility after this agreement. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company made principal and
interest payments to Secunderabad Oils of approximately $2.3
million and $4.5 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2017,
the Company had $0.7 million outstanding under the Secunderabad
Oils agreement.
On April 16, 2017, the Company entered into a similar operating
agreement with Gemini Edibles and Fats India Private Limited
(“Gemini”). Under this agreement, Gemini agreed to
provide the Company with working capital, on an as needed basis, to
fund the purchase of feedstock and other raw materials for its
Kakinada biodiesel facility. Working capital advances bear interest
at the actual bank-borrowing rate of Gemini of twelve percent
(12%). In return, the Company agreed to pay Gemini an amount equal
to 30% of the plant’s monthly net operating profit and
recognized these as operational support charges in the financials.
In the event that the Company’s biodiesel facility operates
at a loss, Gemini owes the Company 30% of the losses as operational
support charges. Either party can terminate the agreement at any
time without penalty. Additionally, Gemini received a first
priority lien on the assets of the Kakinada biodiesel facility.
Since the inception of this agreement, the Company made principal
and interest payments to Gemini of approximately $6.2 million. As
of September 30, 2017, the Company had $3.6 million outstanding on
this raw material purchase agreement.
In October 2016, the Company made an agreement with a supplier of
palm stearin to its Kakinada plant to pay 12% interest on an unpaid
balance under the raw material purchase agreement of $1.9 million.
As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had nil
and $1.5 million outstanding on this raw material purchase
agreement,
respectively.
15
AEMETIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited, tabular data in thousands except par value and per
share data)
Variable Interest Entity (GAFI) Term loan and Revolving
loan
On July 10, 2017, GAFI entered into a Note Purchase Agreement
(“VIE Note Purchase Agreement”) with Third Eye Capital
Corporation. See further discussion regarding GAFI in Note 6.
Pursuant to the VIE Note Purchase Agreement, the Noteholders
agreed, subject to the terms and conditions of the VIE Note
Purchase Agreement and relying on each of the representations and
warranties set forth therein, to make (i) a single term loan to
GAFI in an aggregate amount of fifteen million dollars (“Term
Loan”) and (ii) revolving advances not to exceed ten million
dollars in the aggregate (“Revolving Loan”). The
interest rate per annum applicable to the Term Loan is equal to ten
percent (10%). The interest rate per annum applicable to the
Revolving Loans is the greater of (a) the prime rate plus seven and
three quarters percent (7.75%) and (b) twelve percent (12%). The
maturity date of the Loans (“Maturity Date”) is July
10, 2019, provided that the Maturity Date may be extended at the
option of GAFI for up to two additional one-year periods upon prior
written notice and upon satisfaction of certain conditions and the
payment of a renewal fee for such extension. An initial advance
under the Revolving Loan was made for $2.2 million as a prepayment
of interest on the Term Loan for the first eighteen months of
interest payments. In addition, a fee of $1.0 million was paid in
consideration to Noteholders.
GAFI, the Company and its subsidiary Aemetis Advanced Products
Keyes, Inc. (“AAPK”) also entered into separate
Intercompany Revolving Promissory Notes, dated July 10, 2017
(“Intercompany Revolving Notes”), pursuant to which
GAFI may, from time to time, lend a portion of the proceeds of the
Revolving Loan borrowed under the VIE Note Purchase
Agreement.
In consideration for the direct and indirect benefits from the
transactions contemplated by the VIE Note Purchase Agreement and
the Intercompany Revolving Notes, Aemetis, Inc. and AAPK
("Guarantors") agreed to enter into a Limited Guaranty. Pursuant to
the Limited Guaranty, the Guarantors guarantee the prompt payment
and performance of all unpaid principal and interest on the Loans
and all other obligations and liabilities of GAFI to any
Noteholders in connection with the VIE Note Purchase Agreement. The
obligations of the Guarantors pursuant to the Limited Guaranty are
secured by a first priority lien over all assets of the Guarantors
subject to lien existing in connection with the Existing Note
Purchase Agreement of Guarantors. Each Guarantor agreed to make the
following regulatory and financial covenants: i) maintenance of
existence and compliance, ii) payment of obligations; iii)
reporting requirements on financials of Guarantors annually,
quarterly; iv) delivery of cellulosic ethanol project
progress reports within 15 days of the month end, v) ensuring the
ratio of: (a) the sum of (i) the most recent Mortgaged Property
Market Value, and (ii) the most recent AAPK’s cellulosic
ethanol project value to (b) the Note Indebtedness, to be less
than 2.00:1.00, tested as of the last day of each
fiscal quarter, and (iv) permit the amount of trade payables due to
exceed the sum of the amount of the GAFI’s Cash Equivalents
plus the revolving advances available to be advanced under
the Revolving Loan, tested as of the last day of each
month.
As of September 30, 2017, GAFI obligations are as
follows:
|
As of
|
|
September 30, 2017
|
Term
loan
|
$15,000
|
Revolving
loan
|
9,248
|
Total
debt
|
$24,248
|
Less:
Debt issuance costs
|
(875)
|
Total
debt
|
$23,373
|
|
|
Scheduled debt repayments for loan obligations follow:
Twelve months ended September 30,
|
Debt Repayments
|
2018
|
$14,559
|
2019
|
119,381
|
2020
|
5,000
|
2021
|
12,536
|
Total
debt
|
151,476
|
Discounts
|
(2,643)
|
Total
debt, net of discounts
|
$148,833
|
16
AEMETIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited, tabular data in thousands except par value and per
share data)
5. Stock-Based Compensation
Plan Stock Options
Aemetis authorized the issuance of 2.6 million shares of common
stock under its Zymetis 2006 Stock Plan and Amended and Restated
2007 Stock Plan (together, the “Company Stock Plans”),
which include both incentive and non-statutory stock options. These
options generally expire five to ten years from the date of grant
with a general vesting term of 1/12th
every three months and are exercisable
at any time after vesting subject to continuation of employment. On
January 19, 2017, 637 thousand stock option grants were issued to
employees and directors under the Company Stock Plans. As of
September 30, 2017, 2.2 million options are outstanding under the
Company Stock Plans.
Non-Plan Stock Options
In November 2012, the Company issued 98 thousand stock options to
board members and consultants outside of any Company stock option
plan. As of September 30, 2017, all options are vested and 89
thousand options are outstanding.
Inducement Equity Plan Options
In March 2016, the Board of Directors of the Company approved an
Inducement Equity Plan authorizing the issuance of 100 thousand
non-statutory stock options to purchase common stock. As of
September 30, 2017, 37 thousand options were
outstanding.
Common Stock Reserved for Issuance
The following is a summary of options granted under the Company
Stock Plans:
|
Shares Available for Grant
|
Number of Shares Outstanding
|
Weighted-Average Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
as of December 31, 2016
|
98
|
1,632
|
$4.37
|
Authorized
|
655
|
-
|
-
|
Granted
|
(637)
|
637
|
1.72
|
Forfeited/expired
|
46
|
(46)
|
21.04
|
Balance
as of September 30, 2017
|
162
|
2,223
|
$3.27
|
Stock-based compensation for employees
Stock-based compensation is accounted for in accordance with the
provisions of ASC 718, Compensation-Stock
Compensation, which requires
the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all
stock-based awards made to employees and directors based on
estimated fair values on the grant date. We estimate the fair value
of stock-based awards on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model. The value of the portion of the award that is
ultimately expected to vest is recognized as expense over the
requisite service periods using the straight-line
method.
17
AEMETIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited, tabular data in thousands except par value and per
share data)
For the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company
recorded stock compensation expense in the amount of $196 thousand
and $172 thousand, respectively. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded stock
compensation expense in the amount of $800 thousand and $573
thousand, respectively.
Valuation and Expense Information
All issuances of stock options or other issuances of equity
instruments to employees as the consideration for services received
by us are accounted for based on the fair value of the equity
instrument issued. The fair value of options granted to employees
is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option
valuation model. This valuation model for stock based compensation
expense requires us to make assumptions and judgments about the
variables used in the calculation, including the fair value of our
common stock, the expected term (the period of time that the
options granted are expected to be outstanding), the volatility of
our common stock, a risk-free interest rate, and expected
dividends. We also estimate forfeitures of unvested stock options.
To the extent actual forfeitures differ from the estimates, the
difference will be recorded as a cumulative adjustment in the
period estimates are revised. No compensation cost is recorded for
options that do not vest. We use the simplified calculation of
expected life described in the SEC’s Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 107, Share-Based Payment, and volatility is based on
an average of the historical volatilities of the common stock of
four entities with characteristics similar to those of the Company.
The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in
effect at the time of grant for periods corresponding with the
expected life of the option. We use an expected dividend yield of
zero, as we do not anticipate paying any dividends in the
foreseeable future. Expected forfeitures are assumed zero due to
the small number of plan participants and the plan.
There were no stock options granted during the three months ended
September 30, 2017.
As of September 30, 2017, the Company had $1.1 million of total
unrecognized compensation expense for employees that the Company
will amortize over the 1.81 years of weighted average remaining
term.
6.
Variable Interest Entity
Goodland Advanced Fuels, Inc., (GAFI) was formed to acquire the
Goodland plant in Goodland, Kansas. On July 10, 2017, GAFI entered
into the VIE Note Purchase Agreement with Third Eye Capital
Corporation. GAFI, the Company and its subsidiary AAPK also entered
into separate Intercompany Revolving Notes, pursuant to which GAFI
may, from time to time, lend a portion of the proceeds of the
Revolving Loan incurred under the VIE Note Purchase Agreement.
Guarantors also agreed to enter into that certain Limited Guaranty.
Pursuant to, which the Guarantors guarantee the prompt payment and
performance of all unpaid principal and interest on the Loans and
all other obligations and liabilities of GAFI to Noteholders in
connection with the VIE Note Purchase Agreement. The obligations of
the Guarantors pursuant to the Limited Guaranty are secured by a
first priority lien over all assets of the Guarantors pursuant to
separate general security agreements entered into by each
Guarantor. The aggregate obligations and liabilities of each
Guarantor is limited to the sum of (i) the aggregate amount
advanced by GAFI to such Guarantor under and in accordance with the
Intercompany Revolving Notes and (ii) the obligation of the
Guarantor pursuant to its indemnity and expense obligations under
the Limited Guaranty prior to the date on which the Option is
exercised. Additionally, on July 10, 2017, the Company entered into
an Option Agreement by and between GAFI and the sole shareholder of
GAFI, pursuant to which Aemetis was granted an irrevocable option
to purchase all, but not less than all, of the capital stock of
GAFI for an aggregate purchase price equal to $0.01 per share
(total purchase price of $10.00). This Option provides for
automatic triggering in the event of certain default circumstances.
After the automatic exercise upon default, the Limited Guaranty no
longer applies and the Guarantors are responsible for the
outstanding balances of the GAFI term and revolving
loan.
After
consideration of the above agreements, we concluded that GAFI did
not have enough equity to finance its activities without additional
subordinated support. Additionally, GAFI’s shareholder did
not have a controlling financial interest in the entity. Hence, we
concluded that GAFI is VIE. GAFI is also not a business since it
also does not have processes or inputs that have the ability to
create an output and in turn provide the return to the investor.
The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the party that has both the
power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the
economic performance of the VIE and the obligation to absorb losses
or receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the
VIE. In determining whether Aemetis is the primary beneficiary, a
number of factors are considered, including the structure of the
entity, contractual provisions that grant any additional rights to
influence or control the economic performance of the VIE, and
obligation to absorb significant losses. Through providing Limited
Guaranty and signing the Option Agreement, the Company took the
risks related to operations, financing the Goodland plant, and
agreed to meet the financial covenants to GAFI to be in existence.
Based upon this assessment, Aemetis has enough power to direct the
activities of GAFI and has been determined to be the primary
beneficiary of the GAFI and accordingly the assets, liabilities,
and operations of GAFI are consolidated into those of the Company.
The assets and liabilities were recognized at fair value. In
addition, the interest for 18 months was prepaid which can be used
to pay the interest on GAFI term loan only and the Goodland plant
is collateral for the term loan obligation.
18
AEMETIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited, tabular data in thousands except par value and per
share data)
The following are the Balance Sheet and Statement of Operations of
GAFI:
|
As of
|
|
September 30, 2017
|
Assets
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$482
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
1,978
|
Total
current assets
|
2,460
|
|
|
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
15,408
|
Promissory
note receivable from Aemetis
|
4,802
|
Total
assets
|
$22,670
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholder's deficit
|
|
|
|
Accounts
Payable
|
$4
|
Secured
and Revolving notes
|
23,373
|
Total
liabilities
|
23,377
|
|
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(707)
|
Total
liabilities and stockholder's deficit
|
$22,670
|
|
From July 10, 2017 to
|
|
September 30, 2017
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
$131
|
|
|
Operating
loss
|
(131)
|
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
Interest
rate expense
|
584
|
Amortization
expense
|
125
|
Other
(income) expense
|
(133)
|
Net
loss
|
$(707)
|
19
AEMETIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited, tabular data in thousands except par value and per
share data)
Aemetis, Inc. borrowed $4.8 million under the Intercompany
Revolving Notes to pay off agent advances and pay costs associated
with the testing of cellulosic ethanol production. Aemetis paid
GAFI fees of $1.0 million associated with the entry into the VIE
Note Purchase Agreement, and accordingly holds an account
receivable from GAFI. In the consolidation process, these
intercompany borrowings were eliminated.
7.
Agreements
Working Capital Arrangement. Pursuant to a Corn Procurement and Working Capital
Agreement with J.D. Heiskell, the Company agreed to procure whole
yellow corn and milo primarily from J.D. Heiskell. The Company has
the ability to obtain grain from other sources subject to certain
conditions, however, in the past all of our grain purchases have
been from J.D. Heiskell. Title and risk of loss of the corn and
milo pass to the Company when the corn and milo are deposited into
the weigh bin. The term of the Agreement expires on December 31,
2017 and is automatically renewed for additional one-year terms.
J.D. Heiskell further agrees to sell all ethanol to Kinergy
Marketing or other marketing purchasers designated by the Company
and all WDG and corn oil to A.L. Gilbert. Our relationships with
J.D. Heiskell, Kinergy Marketing, and A.L. Gilbert are well
established and the Company believes that the relationships are
beneficial to all parties involved in utilizing the distribution
logistics, reaching out to widespread customer base, managing
inventory, and building working capital relationships. Revenue is
recognized upon delivery of ethanol to J. D. Heiskell as revenue
recognition criteria have been met and any performance required of
the Company subsequent to the delivery to J.D. Heiskell is
inconsequential. These agreements are ordinary purchase and sale
agency agreements for the Keyes plant.
The J.D. Heiskell sales activity associated with the Purchasing
Agreement, Corn Procurement and Working Capital
Agreements during the three and nine months ended September 30,
2017 and 2016 are as follows:
|
As of and for the three months ended September
30,
|
As of and for the nine months ended September
30,
|
||
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
Ethanol
sales
|
$26,394
|
$24,687
|
$75,695
|
$68,993
|
Wet
distiller's grains sales
|
5,735
|
6,114
|
15,523
|
16,918
|
Corn
oil sales
|
1,043
|
788
|
2,693
|
2,232
|
Corn/milo
purchases
|
25,751
|
23,098
|
75,478
|
67,766
|
Accounts
receivable
|
776
|
345
|
776
|
345
|
Accounts
payable
|
1,976
|
1,241
|
1,976
|
1,241
|
Ethanol and Wet Distillers Grains Marketing Arrangement.
The Company entered into an Ethanol
Marketing Agreement with Kinergy Marketing and a Wet Distillers
Grains Marketing Agreement with A. L. Gilbert. Under the terms of
the agreements, subject to certain conditions, Kinergy agreed to
market on an exclusive basis all the ethanol we produce and A. L.
Gilbert agreed to market on an exclusive basis all the WDG we
produce. The agreements with Kinergy Marketing and with A.L.
Gilbert expire on August 31, 2018 and on December 31, 2017,
respectively, each with automatic one-year renewals thereafter.
For the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the
Company expensed marketing costs of $0.6 million for each period,
respectively, under the terms of both ethanol and wet
distiller’s grains marketing agreements. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company expensed marketing
costs of $1.8 million and $1.7 million,
respectively.
The Company entered into forward purchase contracts for
approximately 0.9 million bushels of corn, which is the principal
raw material for ethanol production. The delivery of this grain
will be expected through December 2017.
20
AEMETIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited, tabular data in thousands except par value and per
share data)
In addition, the Company has forward sales commitments for
approximately 56 thousand tons of WDG. These committed sales will
be expected through December 2017.
Unrealized gains and losses on forward contracts and commitments,
in which delivery has not occurred, are deemed “normal
purchases and normal sales”, and therefore are not marked to
market in the Company’s financial statements, but are subject
to a lower of cost or market assessment.
8.
Segment Information
Aemetis recognizes two reportable geographic operating segments:
“North America” and “India.” The
“North America” operating segment includes the
Company’s owned ethanol plant in Keyes, California, the GAFI
plant in Goodland, Kansas and its technology research and
development lab. As the Company’s technology gains market
acceptance, this business segment will initially include its
domestic commercial application of cellulosic ethanol technology,
its plant construction projects and any acquisitions of ethanol or
ethanol related technology facilities in North
America.
The “India” operating segment includes the
Company’s 50 million gallon per year nameplate capacity
biodiesel manufacturing plant in Kakinada, the administrative
offices in Hyderabad, India, and the holding companies in Nevada
and Mauritius. The Company’s biodiesel is marketed and sold
primarily to customers in India through brokers and by the Company
directly.
Summarized financial information by reportable segment for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016
follows:
|
For the three months ended September 30,
|
For the nine months ended September 30,
|
||
|
2017
|
2016
|
2017
|
2016
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
North
America
|
$36,012
|
$33,889
|
$101,430
|
$93,979
|
India
|
2,923
|
5,488
|
9,843
|
11,783
|
Total
revenues
|
$38,935
|
$39,377
|
$111,273
|
$105,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
|
|
North
America
|
$33,995
|
$30,391
|
$99,003
|
$86,174
|
India
|
$2,985
|
5,320
|
9,197
|
11,892
|
Total
cost of goods sold
|
$36,980
|
$35,711
|
$108,200
|
$98,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
North
America
|
$2,017
|
$3,498
|
$2,427
|
$7,805
|
India
|
(62)
|
168
|
646
|
(109)
|
Total
gross profit (loss)
|
$1,955
|
$3,666
|
$3,073
|
$7,696
|
North America. During the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company’s
revenues from ethanol, WDG, and corn oil were earned pursuant to
the Corn Procurement and Working Capital Agreement established
between the Company and J.D. Heiskell. Sales of ethanol, WDG, and
corn oil to J.D. Heiskell accounted for 92% and 93% of the
Company’s North America segment revenues for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2017,
respectively.
21
AEMETIS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited, tabular data in thousands except par value and per
share data)
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the
Company’s revenues from ethanol, WDG, and corn oil were
earned pursuant to the Corn Procurement and Working Capital
Agreement established between the Company and J.D. Heiskell. Sales
of ethanol, WDG, and corn oil to J.D. Heiskell accounted for 93%
and 94% of the Company’s North America segment revenues for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016,
respectively.
India. During the three months
ended September 30, 2017, three biodiesel customers accounted for
41%, 29%, and 13% and no refined glycerin customers accounted for
more than 10% of consolidated India segment revenues, compared to
two biodiesel customers accounted for 57% and 17% and no refined
glycerin customers accounted for more than 10% of consolidated
India segment revenues during the three months ended September 30,
2016.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, two biodiesel
customers accounted for 47% and 12% and no refined glycerin
customers accounted for more than 10% of consolidated India segment
revenues, compared to two biodiesel customers accounted for 55% and
11% and no refined glycerin customers accounted for more than 10%
of consolidated India segment revenues during the nine months ended
September 30, 2016.
Total assets consist of the following:
|
As of
|
|
|
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
North
America
|
$82,036
|
$67,279
|
India
|
14,295
|
10,531
|
Total
Assets
|
$96,331
|
$77,810
|
9.
Related Party Transactions
The Company owes Eric McAfee, the Company’s Chairman and CEO,
and McAfee Capital, owned by Eric McAfee, $0.4 million in
connection with employment agreements and expense reimbursements
previously accrued as salaries expense and accrued liabilities. The
balance accrued related to these employment agreements was $0.4
million as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016. For the
three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company
expensed $5 thousand and $16 thousand, respectively, to reimburse
actual expenses incurred by McAfee Capital and related entities.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company
expensed $28 thousand and $57 thousand, respectively, to reimburse
actual expenses incurred by McAfee Capital and related entities.
The Company previously prepaid $0.2 million to Redwood Capital, a
company controlled by Eric McAfee, for the Company’s use of
flight time on a corporate jet. As of September 30, 2017, $0.1
million remained as a prepaid expense related to Redwood Capital.
As consideration for the reaffirmation of guaranties required by
Amendment No. 12 to the Note Purchase Agreement, which the Company
entered into with Third Eye Capital on March 21, 2016, the Company
also agreed to pay $0.2 million in consideration to McAfee Capital
in exchange for their willingness to provide the guarantees. The
balance of $156 thousand for guarantee fee remained as accrued
liability as of September 30, 2017 and December 31,
2016.
10. Management’s Plan
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared
contemplating the realization of assets and satisfaction of
liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has been
reliant on their senior secured lender to provide additional
funding and has been required to remit substantially all excess
cash from operations to the senior secured lender.
Management’s plans for the Company include, but are not
limited to:
●
Operating
the Keyes plant;
●
Continuing
to incorporate lower-cost, non-food advanced biofuels feedstock at
the Keyes plant when economical;
●
Obtaining
the remaining $1.0 million of EB-5 Phase I funding from escrow and
$0.5 million from fundraising;
●
Obtaining
$50.0 million in funding from EB-5 Phase II funding currently being
offered to investors;
●
Pursuing
a refinancing of the senior debt with a lender who is able to offer
terms conducive to the long term financing of the Keyes
plant;
●
Use
the Company’s India facility as collateral for additional
working capital or for reducing current financing
costs;
●
Securing
higher volumes of shipments from the Kakinada, India biodiesel and
refined glycerin facility; and
●
Offering
the Company’s common stock by the ATM Registration
Statement.
Management believes that through the above-mentioned actions it
will be able to fund company operations and continue to operate the
secured assets for the foreseeable future. There can be no
assurance that the existing credit facilities and cash from
operations will be sufficient nor that the Company will be
successful at maintaining adequate relationships with the senior
lenders or significant shareholders. Should the Company require
additional financing, there can be no assurances that the
additional financing will be available on terms satisfactory to the
Company.
22
Item
2.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations.
Our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) is provided in
addition to the accompanying consolidated financial statements and
notes to assist readers in understanding our results of operations,
financial condition, and cash flows. MD&A is organized as
follows:
●
Overview.
Discussion of our business and overall analysis of financial and
other highlights affecting us to provide context for the remainder
of MD&A.
●
Results
of Operations. An analysis of our financial
results comparing the three and nine months ended September 30,
2017 to the three and nine months ended September 30,
2016.
●
Liquidity
and Capital Resources. An analysis of changes in
our balance sheets and cash flows and discussion of our financial
condition.
●
Critical
Accounting Estimates. Accounting estimates that we
believe are important to understanding the assumptions and
judgments incorporated in our reported financial results and
forecasts.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the
Aemetis, Inc. consolidated financial statements and accompanying
notes included elsewhere in this report. The following discussion
contains forward-looking statements that reflect the plans,
estimates and beliefs of Aemetis, Inc. As discussed in further
detail above, the actual results could differ materially from those
discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could
cause or contribute to these differences include those discussed
below and elsewhere in this Report, and in other reports we file
with the SEC, specifically our most recent Annual Report on
Form 10-K. All references to years relate to the calendar year
ended December 31 of the particular year.
Overview
Headquartered in Cupertino,
California, Aemetis is an advanced renewable fuels and biochemicals
company focused on the acquisition, development and
commercialization of innovative technologies that replace
traditional petroleum-based products through the conversion of
second-generation ethanol and biodiesel plants into advanced
biorefineries. Founded in 2006, we own and operate a 60
million gallon per year ethanol production facility in the
California Central Valley near Modesto where we manufacture and
produce ethanol, wet distillers’ grains (“WDG”),
condensed distillers solubles (“CDS”), and
distillers’ corn oil. We also own and operate a 50
million gallon per year renewable chemical and advanced fuel
production facility on the East Coast of India producing high
quality distilled biodiesel and refined glycerin for customers in
India and Europe. We operate a research and development
laboratory and hold a portfolio of patents and related technology
licenses for the production of renewable fuels and
biochemicals. Goodland Advanced Fuels, Inc., (GAFI) was
formed to acquire the Goodland plant in Goodland, Kansas. GAFI is a
VIE since it does not have enough equity to support its own
activities. GAFI entered into a VIE Note Purchase Agreement with
Third Eye Capital Corporation. GAFI, the Company and its subsidiary
AAPK also entered into separate Intercompany Revolving Notes,
pursuant to which GAFI may lend a portion of the proceedsof the
Revolving Loan incurred under the Note Purchase Agreement. Aemetis,
Inc. and AAPK (Guarantors) also agreed to provide certain Limited
Guaranty on the VIE Note Purchase Agreement terms and also entered
into Option Agreement with GAFI shareholder to purchase all shares
of GAFI at $0.01 per share ($10.00). Given acceptance of more risk
and direct and indirect benefits received through the VIE Note
Purchase Agreement and providing guarantees on repayment of debt of
GAFI, Aemetis has the power to direct the activities of GAFI and
has plans to apply cellulosic ethanol technology to Goodland
plant.
23
Our revenue development strategy for the second half of 2017 and
2018 in North America is based on supplying ethanol into the fuel
markets in Northern California and supplying feed products in the
form of WDG to dairy and feed operations in Northern California. We
are actively seeking higher value markets for our ethanol in an
effort to improve our overall margin and are actively educating
local dairy and feed potential customers on the value of our WDG
product in an effort to further strengthen demand for this product.
During the third quarter, we entered into an agreement with a major
industrial gas company to sell CO2 produced at the Keyes ethanol
plant, which will add incremental income for the North America
segment. In addition to these efforts, we are developing an
advanced cellulosic ethanol project near our plant in Keyes, CA for
the deployment of the combined LanzaTech and InEnTec technologies
using primarily orchard wood and shells from the Central Valley as
feedback. Technology agreements have been signed, the site location
has been leased, and an Integrated Demonstration Unit is operating,
which we expect will demonstrate the effectiveness of the
technologies to produce cellulosic ethanol at profitable
yields.
Our revenue strategy in India is based on continuing to sell
biodiesel to our bulk fuel customers, beginning sales to retail
customers using recent regulatory changes in India that allow sales
of biodiesel at retail fuel stations, pursuing tender offers placed
by India government oil companies for bulk purchases of fuels, and
delivering biodiesel under our agreement with British Petroleum
Singapore for sales into the European markets. Recent changes in
July 2017 in India's Goods and Services Tax (GST) raised the
combined tax rate from 11% to 18% on our sales into the Indian
domestic markets, though this higher tax rate is under review. This
increase in GST taxation is expected to hamper domestic India
revenue expansion and generate lower margins. Further increases in
the price of crude oil, which sets a ceiling on the price we
receive for our biodiesel, could offset the impact of the GST
legislation. We believe the deployment of these strategies will
allow for continued growth in revenue through the fourth quarter of
2017 and into 2018.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Three Months
Ended September 30, 2016
Revenues
Our revenues are derived primarily from sales of ethanol and Wet
Distillers Grains (WDG) in North America and biodiesel and glycerin
in India.
Three Months Ended September 30 (in thousands)
|
2017
|
2016
|
Inc/(dec)
|
% change
|
North
America
|
$36,012
|
$33,889
|
$2,123
|
6%
|
India
|
2,923
|
5,488
|
(2,565)
|
-47%
|
Total
|
$38,935
|
$39,377
|
$(442)
|
-1%
|
North America. For the three
months ended September 30, 2017, we generated 78% of our revenue
from sales of ethanol, 19% from sales of WDG, and 3% from sales of
distillers’ corn oil and CDS. During the three months, ended
September 30, 2017, plant production averaged 111% of the 55
million gallons per year nameplate capacity. The increase in
revenues during the three months ended September 30, 2017 was due
to ethanol sales volumes increasing by 4% to 15.4 million gallons
from 14.8 million gallons while average ethanol prices also
increased by 4% to $1.81 per gallon from $1.75 per gallon compared
to September 30, 2016. The average price of WDG decreased by 11% to
$66.29 per ton while WDG sales volumes increased 8% to 104.7
thousand tons during the three months ended September 30, 2017
compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016. WDG pricing
was impacted by lower pricing of the competing products as well as
customer pressure caused by narrowing dairy margins in the
California region where we sell our product.
24
India. For the three
months ended September 30, 2017, we generated 86% of our sales from
biodiesel and 14% of our sales from refined glycerin, compared to
the three months ended September 30, 2016 when we generated 90% of
our sales from biodiesel and 10% of our sales from refined
glycerin. The decrease in revenues was primarily attributable to
decreases in overall sales volumes by 50% in the three months ended
September 30, 2017 as compared to the three months ended September
30, 2016, as GST tax was increased from 11% to 18%. The Company was
to bear the difference of increased taxes and could not make the
margins as average sales prices could not make up the difference,
hence the sales decreased in the three months ended September 30,
2017. Biodiesel sales volumes decreased to 3 thousand metric tons
from 6 thousand metric tons in the three months ended September 30,
2016 while the average sales prices increased by 2% to $837 per
metric ton. Similarly, sales volumes of refined glycerin decreased
to 438 metric tons from 852 metric tons in the three months ended
September 30, 2016 while average sales prices of glycerin increased
by 46% to $905 per metric ton.
Cost of Goods Sold
Three Months Ended September 30 (in thousands)
|
2017
|
2016
|
Inc/(dec)
|
% change
|
North
America
|
$33,995
|
$30,391
|
$3,604
|
12%
|
India
|
2,985
|
5,320
|
(2,335)
|
-44%
|
Total
|
$36,980
|
$35,711
|
$1,269
|
4%
|
North America. We ground 5.5
million bushels of corn at an average price of $4.65 per bushel
during the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to 5.2
million bushels of corn at an average price of $4.45 per bushel
during the three months ended September 30, 2016. Our cost of
feedstock increased by 5% during the three months ended September
30, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016.
India. The decrease in costs of
goods sold was attributable to decreases in sales volumes of
biodiesel by 50% to 3 thousand metric tons from 6 thousand metric
tons and refined glycerin by 49% to 4 hundred metric tons from 8
hundred metric tons compared to three months ended September 30,
2016.
Gross Profit
Three Months Ended September 30 (in thousands)
|
2017
|
2016
|
Inc/(dec)
|
% change
|
North
America
|
$2,017
|
$3,498
|
$(1,481)
|
-42%
|
India
|
(62)
|
168
|
(230)
|
-137%
|
Total
|
$1,955
|
$3,666
|
$(1,711)
|
-47%
|
North America. Gross profit
decreased by 42% due to Brazilian imports
to California which placed pricing pressure on West Coast ethanol
which did not rise as fast as corn prices combined with sluggish
international demand for dry distillers’ grains which placed
pricing pressure on locally sold WDG.
25
India. The decrease in gross
profit was attributable to an increase in the average feedstock
costs of biodiesel by 20% to $713 per metric ton, and in the
average feedstock costs of refined glycerin by 78% to $775 per
metric ton partially offset by increase in average selling price of
refined glycerin by 46% in the three months ended September 30,
2017, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016. In
addition, introduction of GST by the Government of India affected
sales volumes due to the additional burden of costs to the
Company.
Operating Expenses
R&D
Three Months Ended September 30 (in thousands)
|
2017
|
2016
|
Inc/(dec)
|
% change
|
North
America
|
$1,876
|
$87
|
$1,789
|
2056%
|
India
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0%
|
Total
|
$1,876
|
$87
|
$1,789
|
2056%
|
The increase in R&D expenses in our North America segment for
the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the three
months ended September 30, 2016 was due to recognition of the
expenses toward building and testing the Integration Demonstration
Unit for cellulosic ethanol of $1.8 million and increases in
professional fees of $14 thousand driven by the relocation of our
research and development facility from Maryland to Minnesota,
offset by decreases in salaries and wages of $19 thousand and
supplies and rent expenses of $20 thousand.
Selling, General & Administrative (SG&A)
Three Months Ended September 30 (in thousands)
|
2017
|
2016
|
Inc/(dec)
|
% change
|
North
America
|
$2,941
|
$3,015
|
$(74)
|
-2%
|
India
|
241
|
207
|
34
|
16%
|
Total
|
$3,182
|
$3,222
|
$(40)
|
-1%
|
SG&A expenses consist primarily of salaries and related
expenses for employees, marketing expenses related to sales of
ethanol and WDG in North America and biodiesel and other products
in India, as well as professional fees, other corporate expenses,
and related facilities expenses.
North America SG&A expenses
as a percentage of revenue during the three months ended September
30, 2017 decreased to 8% as compared to 9% in the corresponding
period of 2016. SG&A expenses during the three months ended
September 30, 2017 decreased by 2% compared to the three months
ended September 30, 2016. The decrease was due to decreases in
insurance and penalties on property taxes of $0.3 million,
professional fees of $0.1 million offset by increases in salaries
and supplies of $140 thousand and marketing and other expenses of
$58 thousand. In addition, GAFI expenses added $131 thousand to
SG&A expenses during the three months ended September 30,
2017.
26
India. SG&A expenses as a
percentage of revenue in the three months ended September 30, 2017
increased to 8% as compared to 4% in the corresponding period of
2016. The increase relative to revenue was driven by the fixed cost
nature of SG&A expenses in an environment of decreasing
revenues. More specifically, SG&A expenses increased due to
increases in salaries, utilities, and other expenses by $14
thousand, professional fees by $51 thousand and offset by decreases
in supplies and depreciation expense of $30
thousand.
Other (Income) and Expense
Three Months Ended September 30 (in thousands)
|
2017
|
2016
|
Inc/(dec)
|
% change
|
North
America
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
rate expense
|
$3,713
|
$2,951
|
$762
|
26%
|
Amortization
expense
|
1,265
|
1,425
|
(160)
|
-11%
|
Other
(income) expense
|
(5)
|
5
|
(10)
|
-200%
|
|
|
|
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
rate expense
|
154
|
95
|
59
|
62%
|
Other
(income)
|
(13)
|
(24)
|
11
|
46%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$5,114
|
$4,452
|
$662
|
15%
|
Other (Income)/Expense. Other
(income) expense consists primarily of interest and amortization
expense attributable to debt facilities acquired by our parent
company and our subsidiaries, and interest accrued on the judgment
obtained by Cordillera Fund and The Industrial Company (TIC). The
debt facilities include stock or warrants issued as fees. The fair
value of stock and warrants are amortized as amortization expense,
except when the extinguishment accounting method is applied, in
which case refinanced debt costs are recorded as extinguishment
loss or gain.
North America. Interest expense
was higher in the three months ended September 30, 2017 due to
higher outstanding debt balances. GAFI interest expense of $584
thousand was recorded as part of North America interest rate
expense. The decrease in amortization expense is due to debt
issuance costs added during the first quarter were amortized offset
by debt issuance costs added during the third quarter through
refinancing the Subordinated Notes. In addition, GAFI related debt
discount issuance costs of $1.0 million were paid and $125 thousand
amortization was recognized in the three months ended September 30,
2017.
India. Interest expense for the
three months ended September 30, 2017 was higher due to two working
capital agreements with Gemini and Secunderabad Oils. The decrease
in other income was caused by a decrease in foreign exchange gains
of $25 thousand offset by increase in other income by $15
thousand.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2016
Revenues
Our revenues are derived primarily from sales of ethanol and WDG in
North America and biodiesel and glycerin in India.
27
Nine Months Ended September 30 (in thousands)
|
2017
|
2016
|
Inc/(dec)
|
% change
|
North
America
|
$101,430
|
$93,979
|
$7,451
|
8%
|
India
|
9,843
|
11,783
|
(1,940)
|
-16%
|
Total
|
$111,273
|
$105,762
|
$5,511
|
5%
|
North America. For the nine
months ended September 30, 2017, we generated 79% of our revenue
from sales of ethanol, 19% from sales of WDG, and 2% from sales of
distillers’ corn oil and CDS. During the nine
months, ended September 30, 2017, plant production averaged 108% of
the 55 million gallon per year nameplate capacity. The
increase in revenues between the nine months ended September 30,
2017 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 is due to
increases in ethanol sales volumes by 8% to 44.5 million gallons,
combined with an average ethanol price increase by 3% to $1.79 per
gallon. In addition, the average price of WDG decreased by 13% to
$63.21 per ton while WDG sales volumes increased by 8% to 300
thousand tons during the nine months ended September 30, 2017
compared to the nine months ended September 30,
2016.
India. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2017, we generated 76% of our sales from
biodiesel and 24% of our sales from refined glycerin, compared to
87% of our sales from biodiesel and 13% of our sales from refined
glycerin during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Biodiesel
sales volumes decreased by 39% to 8.5 thousand metric tons while
average prices of biodiesel increased by 19% to $873 per metric
ton. Sales volumes of refined glycerin increased by 13% to 3.0
thousand metric tons while average prices of glycerin also
increased by 36% to $770 per metric ton during the nine months
ended September 30, 2017 compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2016. In addition, the introduction of new GST by the
Government of India in July 2017 affected sales volumes due to the
additional burden of costs to the Company.
Cost of Goods Sold
Nine Months Ended September 30 (in thousands)
|
2017
|
2016
|
Inc/(dec)
|
% change
|
North
America
|
$99,003
|
$86,174
|
$12,829
|
15%
|
India
|
9,197
|
11,892
|
(2,695)
|
-23%
|
Total
|
$108,200
|
$98,066
|
$10,134
|
10%
|
North America. We
ground 15.8 million bushels of corn at an average price of $4.78
per bushel during the nine months ended September 30, 2017,
compared to 14.4 million bushels of corn at an average price of
$4.58 per bushel during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.
The increase in cost of goods sold was attributable to increase in
cost of corn by 4% coupled with increases in gallons sold by 8% in
the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same
period in 2016.
India. The decrease
in cost of goods sold was attributable to a decrease in overall
sales by 16% offset by the average prices of feedstock for all
products increased by 40% to $745 per metric ton for the nine
months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $533 per metric ton in
the nine months ended September 30, 2016.
Gross Profit
Nine Months Ended September 30 (in thousands)
|
2017
|
2016
|
Inc/(dec)
|
% change
|
North
America
|
$2,427
|
$7,805
|
$(5,378)
|
-69%
|
India
|
646
|
(109)
|
755
|
693%
|
Total
|
$3,073
|
$7,696
|
$(4,623)
|
-60%
|
28
North America. Gross profit
decreased due to Brazilian imports
to California which placed pricing pressure on West Coast ethanol
which did not rise as fast as corn prices combined with sluggish
international demand for dry distillers’ grains which placed
pricing pressure on locally sold WDG. In addition, the usage of milo, which allowed us
to receive grant income of $2.0 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2016, increased the gross profit during the nine
months ended September 30, 2016.
India. The increase in gross
profit was attributable to increase in overall average sales price
for all products by 19% to $845, offset by an increase in overall feedstock
costs by 40% to $745. In addition, the introduction of new GST by
the Government of India in July 2017 affected sales volumes due to
the additional burden of costs to the Company.
Operating Expenses
R&D
Nine Months Ended September 30 (in thousands)
|
2017
|
2016
|
Inc/(dec)
|
% change
|
North
America
|
$2,072
|
$290
|
$1,782
|
614%
|
India
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
0%
|
Total
|
$2,072
|
$290
|
$1,782
|
614%
|
The increase in R&D expenses in our North America segment for
the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the nine
months ended September 30, 2016 was due to recognition of the
expenses toward building and testing the Integration Demonstration
Unit for cellulosic ethanol of $1.8 million, increase in
professional fees by $59 thousand, and travel and other expenses of
$10 thousand due to the moving of research facility from Maryland
to Minnesota, offset by a decrease in salaries and wages of $71
thousand and supplies and rent expenses of $26
thousand.
Selling, General & Administrative (SG&A)
Nine Months Ended September 30 (in thousands)
|
2017
|
2016
|
Inc/(dec)
|
% change
|
North
America
|
$8,832
|
$8,177
|
$655
|
8%
|
India
|
907
|
946
|
(39)
|
-4%
|
Total
|
$9,739
|
$9,123
|
$616
|
7%
|
SG&A expenses consist primarily of salaries and related
expenses for employees, marketing expenses related to sales of
ethanol and WDG in North America and biodiesel and other products
in India, as well as professional fees, other corporate expenses,
related facilities expenses and operational support fees paid to
our working capital partner, Gemini and Secunderabad Oils, as part
of an operating profit sharing arrangement.
North America. SG&A expenses as a percentage of
revenue during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 were
consistent at 9% as compared to the corresponding period of 2016.
The increase in SG&A expenses was primarily due to increases in
salaries and stock compensation expenses of $0.5 million and
marketing, depreciation, supplies and other expenses of $0.2
million, partially offset by decreases in professional fees of $0.1
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to
the nine months ended September 30, 2016. In addition, GAFI
expenses added$131 thousand to SG&A expenses during the three
months ended September 30, 2017.
29
India. SG&A
expenses as a percentage of revenue in the nine months ended
September 30, 2017 increased to 9% as compared to 8% in the
corresponding period of 2016. Overall SG&A expenses decreased
slightly period over period due to decreases in salaries and
supplies of $101 thousand, and marketing and depreciation expenses
of $44 thousand partially offset by increases in professional fees,
utilities, and travel expenses of $106
thousand.
Other Income and Expense
Nine Months Ended September 30 (in thousands)
Other
(income)/expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017
|
2016
|
Inc/(dec)
|
% change
|
North
America
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
rate expense
|
$9,694
|
$8,461
|
$1,233
|
15%
|
Amortization
expense
|
4,112
|
4,269
|
(157)
|
-4%
|
Other
(income) expense
|
33
|
(405)
|
438
|
-108%
|
|
|
|
|
|
India
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
rate expense
|
179
|
218
|
(39)
|
-18%
|
Other
(income)
|
(31)
|
(75)
|
44
|
59%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
$13,987
|
$12,468
|
$1,519
|
12%
|
Other (Income)/Expense. Other
(income) expense consists primarily of interest and amortization
expense attributable to debt facilities acquired by our parent
company and our subsidiaries, and interest accrued on the judgments
obtained by Cordillera Fund and The Industrial Company (TIC). The
debt facilities include stock or warrants issued as fees. The fair
value of stock and warrants are amortized as amortization expense,
except when the extinguishment accounting method is applied, in
which case refinanced debt costs are recorded as extinguishment
expense.
North America. Interest expense
was higher during the nine months ended September 30, 2017 due to
higher debt balances. In addition, GAFI’s interest expense of
$584 thousand was included in North America segment. The slight
decrease in amortization expense is due to debt issuance costs
added during the first nine months were amortized offset by debt
issuance costs added during the third quarter through refinancing
the Subordinated Notes. In addition, GAFI related debt issuance
costs of $1 million were paid and $125 thousand amortization was
recognized in the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The
decrease in other income in the nine months ended September 30,
2017 was due to receipt of $0.5 million from a PG&E gas credit
in the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to regular
activity during the nine months ended September 30,
2017.
India. Interest expense
decreased due to pay off the State Bank of India loan in 2016
offset by increase in working capital utilization with two working
capital partners in the nine months ended September 30,
2017.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents were $1.7 million at September 30, 2017,
of which $0.9 million was held in our North American entities,
including $0.5 million held by GAFI, $0.8 million was held in our
Indian subsidiary. Our current ratio at September 30, 2017 was 0.38
compared to a current ratio of 0.26 at December 31, 2016. We expect
that our future available capital resources will consist primarily
of cash generated from operations, remaining cash balances, EB-5
program borrowings, amounts available for borrowing, if any, under
our senior debt facilities and our subordinated debt facilities,
and any additional funds raised through sales of
equity.
30
Liquidity
Cash and cash equivalents, current assets, current liabilities and
debt at the end of each period were as follows (in
thousands):
|
September 30,
2017
|
December 31,
2016
|
Cash
and cash equivalents $
|
$1,749
|
1,486
|
Current
assets (including cash, cash equivalents, and
deposits)
|
12,640
|
7,045
|
Current
and long term liabilities (excluding all debt)
|
19,294
|
15,909
|
Current
& long term debt
|
148,583
|
111,714
|
Our principal sources of liquidity have been cash provided by
operations and borrowings under various debt arrangements. As of
September 30, 2017, the EB-5 escrow account is holding funds from
two investors pending approval by the USCIS. These funds represent
$1.0 million of funding that is expected to be released from the
escrow account during the first half of 2018. On October 16, 2016,
we launched a new EB-5 Phase II funding, under which we expect to
issue $50.0 million in additional EB-5 Notes on substantially
similar terms and conditions as those issued under our EB-5 Phase I
funding. Our principal uses of cash have been to refinance
indebtedness and capital expenditures. We anticipate these uses
will continue to be our principal uses of cash in the future.
Global financial and credit markets have been volatile in recent
years, and future adverse conditions of these markets could
negatively affect our ability to secure funds or raise capital at a
reasonable cost or at all.
We operate in a volatile market in which we have little control
over the major components of production costs and product revenues
and are making investments in future facilities and facility
upgrades that improve the overall margin while lessening the impact
of these volatile markets. As such, we expect cash
provided by operating activities to fluctuate in future periods
primarily because of changes in the prices for corn, ethanol, WDG,
distillers’ corn oil, CDS, biodiesel, waste fats and oils,
non-refined palm oil and natural gas. To the extent that we
experience periods in which the spread between ethanol prices and
corn and energy costs narrow or the spread between biodiesel prices
and waste fats and oils or palm oil and energy costs narrow, we may
require additional working capital to fund
operations.
Management believes that through: (i) operating the Keyes
plant, (ii) continuing to incorporate lower-cost, advanced biofuels
feedstock at the Keyes plant when economical, thereby increasing
operating margins, (iii) obtaining the remaining $1.0 million of
EB-5 Phase I funding from escrow and $0.5 million from fund
raising, (iv) obtaining $50.0 million in funding from EB-5 Phase II
funding currently being offered to investors, (v) refinancing
senior debt on terms more commensurate with the long-term financing
of capital assets, (vi) securing higher volumes of sales from
the Kakinada plant, (vii) continuing to expand the domestic India
markets, (viii) using the availability on the existing working
capital credit line, and (ix) sales of common stock under the ATM
registration statement, we will be able to obtain the liquidity
necessary to fund company operations for the foreseeable future.
However, there is no assurance that our operations will generate
sufficient positive cash flow, or that additional funds will be
available to us, through borrowings or otherwise, on favorable
terms when required, or at all.
At September 30, 2017, the outstanding balance of principal,
interest and fees, net of discounts, on all Third Eye Capital Notes
equaled $70.9 million not including the GAFI debt. The current
maturity date for all of the Third Eye Capital financing
arrangements is April 1, 2018; provided, however, that pursuant to
Amendment No. 13, dated March 1, 2017, we have the right to extend
the maturity date of the Third Eye Capital Notes to April
1, 2019 upon notice and payment of a 5% extension fee. We
intend to pay the Third Eye Capital Notes through operational cash
flow, proceeds from the issuance of the EB-5 Notes, a senior debt
refinancing and/or equity financing.
31
At September 30, 2017, GAFI’s outstanding balance of
principal, interest and fees, net of discounts, on all Third Eye
Capital Notes equaled $23.4 million. The current maturity date for
all of the Third Eye Capital financing arrangements is July 10,
2019. GAFI intends to pay the Third Eye Capital Notes through
proceeds from the issuance of the EB-5 Notes.
Our senior lender has provided a series of accommodating amendments
to the existing and previous loan facilities in the past as
described in further detail in Note 4.Debt
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements in Part I of this Form 10-Q. However, there can be
no assurance that our senior lender will continue to provide
further amendments or accommodations or will fund additional
amounts in the future.
We also rely on our working capital lines with J.D. Heiskell in
California and Gemini Edible Oils and Fats in India to fund our
commercial arrangements for the acquisitions of feedstock. J.D.
Heiskell currently provides us with working capital for the Keyes
plant and Gemini Edible Oils and Fats currently provides us with
working capital for the Kakinada plant. The ability of both
J.D. Heiskell and Gemini Edible Oils and Fats to continue to
provide us with working capital depends in part on both of their
respective financial strength and banking
relationships.
Change in Working Capital and Cash Flows
The below table describes the changes in current and long-term debt
during the nine months ended September 30, 2017:
Change in total debt
|
36,869
|
|
Increases
to debt:
|
|
|
Accrued
interest
|
9,569
|
|
Covenant
Waiver fee
|
750
|
|
TEC
debt Extension fee
|
3,100
|
|
January
2017 Promissory note including $0.6 million withheld as fees by
TEC
|
2,100
|
|
April
2017 Promissory note including $1.0 million withheld as fees by
TEC
|
1,500
|
|
GAFI
Term loan and Revolving loan
|
24,160
|
|
Sub
debt extension fees
|
680
|
|
Secunderabad
Oils and Gemini working capital draws
|
10,733
|
|
EB-5
debt escrow funds received
|
500
|
|
Total
increases to debt
|
53,092
|
|
|
|
|
Decreases
to debt:
|
|
|
principal
and Interest payments to senior lender
|
(4,986)
|
|
Interest
payments to EB-5 investors
|
(430)
|
|
Principal
payments to Secunderabad Oils
|
(2,339)
|
|
Principal
and interest payments to Gemini
|
(6,082)
|
|
Debt
discount issuance costs to be amortized
|
(1,890)
|
|
GAFI
interest payments
|
(496)
|
|
Total
decreases to debt
|
(16,223)
|
Working capital changes resulted in (i) a $2.5 million increase in
inventories due to Palm Sludge Oil (PSO) purchased for processing
of BP biodiesel in the third quarter by India operations and (ii) a
$2.2 million increase in prepaid expenses and other assets mainly
due to fees of $2.0 million prepaid interest on GAFI Term Loan and
insurance and $0.2 million in Aemetis, Inc. insurance and other
prepaid, a $0.3 million increase in cash and $0.6 million increase
in accounts receivable.
32
Net cash used by operating activities during the nine months ended
September 30, 2017 was $6.4 million, net of non-cash charges of
$8.5 million, net changes in operating assets and liabilities of
$7.9 million and net loss of $22.7` million. The non-cash charges consisted of (i)
$4.2 million in amortization of debt issuance costs and patents,
(ii) $3.5 million in depreciation expenses and (iii) $0.8 million
in stock-based compensation expense. Net changes in operating
assets and liabilities consisted primarily of an increase in
inventories of $2.5 million and increase in accounts receivable,
partially offset by: (i) a $1.5 million increase in accounts
payable, (ii) a $1.6 million increase in other liabilities, (iii) a
$48 thousand decrease in prepaids and other assets and (iv) a $8.1
million in accrued interest.
Cash used by investing activities consists of capital expenditures
of $0.4 million from North America entities and $0.2 million from
our UBPL operations.
Cash provided by financing activities was $7.1 million, primarily
from $13.1 million in debt proceeds consisting of $0.5 million
received from the EB-5 program, $2.0 million received from TEC
promissory notes, and $10.7 million from working capital partners
in India for UBPL operations, and from proceeds from borrowings of
$2.8 million from GAFI operations, partially offset by payments of
$8.4 million in principal and interest to working capital partners
in India for UBPL operations and $0.5 million to TEC.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results
of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements,
which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation
of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and
judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of net
sales and expenses for each period. We believe that of our most
significant accounting policies, the following represents our
critical accounting policies, defined as those policies that we
believe are the most important to the portrayal of our financial
condition and results of operations and that require
management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments,
often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects
of matters that are inherently uncertain: revenue recognition;
recoverability of long-lived assets, convertible notes, and
extinguishment accounting. These significant accounting principles
are more fully described in “Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations—Critical Accounting Policies” in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2016.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the FASB issued new guidance on the recognition of
revenue. The guidance stated that an entity should recognize
revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to
customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the
entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or
services. The standard is effective for annual reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within
that reporting period. The Company’s adoption of this
accounting standard begins with the first quarter of fiscal year
2018. In March and April 2016, the FASB issued further revenue
recognition guidance amending principal vs. agent considerations
regarding whether an entity should recognize revenue to depict the
transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount
that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be
entitled in exchange for those goods and services. The Company is
currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this accounting
standard update on its consolidated results of operations and
financial condition and will be providing guidance in its Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk.
Not applicable.
33
Item
4.
Controls
and Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
Management (with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer
(CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), carried out an evaluation
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that,
as of the end of the period covered in this report, our disclosure
controls and procedures along with the related internal controls
over financial reporting were effective to provide reasonable
assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in
reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods
specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms,
and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including
our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our
disclosure controls or our internal control over financial
reporting will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control
system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only
reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s
objectives will be met. Our controls and procedures are designed to
provide reasonable assurance that our control system’s
objective will be met and our CEO and CFO have concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable
assurance level. The design of a control system must reflect the
fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of
controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further,
because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that
misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all
control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company
have been detected. These inherent limitations include the
realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that
breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls
can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by
collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the
controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on
certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there
can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its
stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of
any evaluation of the effectiveness of controls in future periods
are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of
compliance with policies or procedures.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal controls over financial
reporting during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
34
PART II -- OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1.
Legal
Proceedings
On August 31, 2016, the Company filed a lawsuit in Santa Clara
County Superior Court against defendants EdenIQ, Inc. (EdenIQ) and
its CEO, Brian D. Thome and Trinity Capital Investments (Trinity).
The lawsuit is based on EdenIQ’s wrongful termination of a
merger agreement that would have effectuated the merger of the
Company and EdenIQ. The lawsuit also asserts that EdenIQ and Mr.
Thome fraudulently induced the Company into assisting EdenIQ to
obtain EPA approval for a new technology, which the Company would
not have done but for the merger agreement. The relief sought
includes EdenIQ’s specific performance of the merger
agreement and monetary damages, as well as punitive damages,
attorneys’ fees, and costs. Trinity was later dismissed from
the lawsuit due to jurisdictional issues, but the Company is
pursuing Trinity in Arizona where it is domiciled. In
response to the Company’s Santa Clara County lawsuit, EdenIQ
has filed a cross-complaint asserting causes of action relating to
the Company’s alleged inability to consummate the merger, the
Company’s interactions with EdenIQ’s business partners,
and the Company’s publicity of the status of the
merger. EdenIQ seeks monetary damages, punitive damages,
injunctive relief, attorneys’ fees and costs. Due to
the early stage of the litigation, an estimate as to any Company
losses cannot be made at this time.
On August 4, 2013, GS Cleantech Corporation, a subsidiary of
Greenshift Corporation (“Greenshift”), filed a
complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of California – Fresno Division against us and our
subsidiary, AAFK. The case was transferred to the Southern
District of Indiana and joined to a pending Multidistrict
Litigation. The complaint alleges infringement of patent
rights assigned to Greenshift and pertaining to corn oil extraction
processes we employ, and seeks royalties, treble damages,
attorney’s fees, and injunctions precluding us from further
infringement. The corn oil extraction process we use is
licensed to us by Valicor Separation Technologies LLC.
Valicor has no obligations to indemnify us. On October
23, 2014, the Court ruled that all the claims of all the patents at
issue in the case are invalid and, therefore, not infringed and
adopted this finding in our case on January 16, 2015. GS
Cleantech has said it will appeal this decision when the remaining
claim in the suit has been decided. We believe the likelihood
of Greenshift succeeding on appeal of the invalidity findings is
small since the Court’s findings included several grounds for
invalidity of each allegedly infringed patent. If Greenshift
successfully appeals the findings of invalidity, damages
may be $1 million or more. The suit also alleged that GS
Cleantech obtained the patents at issue by inequitably conducting
itself before the United States Patent Office. A trial in the
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana on that issue
was concluded and the Court found the patents unenforceable because
of inequitable conduct by GS Cleantech and its counsel before the
Patent and Trademark Office. GS Cleantech has asked the Court
to reconsider its decision, citing the existence of a recently
issued patent that the patent examiner allowed despite the
Court’s findings and the allowance of which the Court did not
consider when making its decision of inequitable conduct. On
March 20, 2017, GS Cleantech and its counsel, Cantor Colburn LLP
filed a Notice of Appeal regarding the current ruling on
inequitable conduct. The Appeal has been stayed for 60 days to
allow the parties an opportunity to discuss settlement. On April 5,
2017, the parties asked the Court for an extension of the current
stay in the case which was granted.
Item
1A. Risk Factors.
No change in risk factors since the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 filed with the
SEC on March 17, 2017.
Item
2.
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
On July 1, 2017, we issued 113 thousand
shares of our common stock to two subordinated promissory note
holders pursuant to the note holders’ warrant exercise at an
exercise price of $0.01 per share.
The above issuance was exempt from registration under
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as
sales of securities not involving any public offering.
35
Item
3.
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities.
No events of default have occurred on the senior securities during
the three months ended September 30, 2017
Item
4.
Mine
Safety Disclosures.
None
Item
5.
Other
Information.
None
Item
6. Exhibits.
3.1
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation filed on March 16,
2017.
|
31.1
|
Certifications pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
31.2
|
Certifications pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of
2002.
|
32.1
|
Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
32.2
|
Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
36
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
AEMETIS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Eric A. McAfee
|
|
|
Eric A. McAfee
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
Date: November 9, 2017
|
AEMETIS, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Todd Waltz
|
|
|
Todd Waltz
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
|
Date: November 9, 2017
37