Agentix Corp. - Annual Report: 2017 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2017

Commission File No. 000-55383

32932 Pacific Coast Highway, #14-254

Dana Point, California 92629

(Address of principal executive offices, zip code)

(949) 933-5411

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

_______________________________________

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,

if changed since last report)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $.001 par value

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files) Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

At February 28, 2017 , the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant (without admitting that any person whose shares are not included in such calculation is an affiliate) was $2,531,213. At December 12, 2017, there were 6,017,406 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding.

FAIRWIND ENERGY INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K of FairWind Energy Inc., a Nevada corporation, contains “forward-looking statements,” as defined in the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “expects”, “plans”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential” or “continue” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements about our market opportunity, our strategies, competition, expected activities and expenditures as we pursue our business plan, and the adequacy of our available cash resources. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Actual results may differ materially from the predictions discussed in these forward-looking statements. The economic environment within which we operate could materially affect our actual results.

Our management has included projections and estimates in this Form 10-K, which are based primarily on management’s experience in the industry, assessments of our results of operations, discussions and negotiations with third parties and a review of information filed by our competitors with the SEC or otherwise publicly available. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. We disclaim any obligation subsequently to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

All references in this Form 10-K to the “Company”, “FairWind Energy”, “we”, “us,” or “our” are to FairWind Energy Inc.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

ORGANIZATION WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS

FairWind Energy was incorporated on April 18, 2013. Through its proprietary use of materials and manufacturing technique, FairWind Energy is developing power sources drawing from renewable energy supply. We also use our trade secrets and composite industry know-how to cross-market products into the oil & gas extraction industry. Providing a reliable power source based on renewable energies required us to address shortcomings of existing technologies ranging from availability of supply (e.g., solar power at night) to quality of componentry available (blades, stanchions, magnets). The hybridization of power sources (solar and wind) and manufacturing with next generation composite materials is our solution. Our fiscal year end is August 31, and we have no subsidiaries. Our business offices are currently located at 32932 Pacific Coast Highway, #14-254, Dana Point, California 92629.

We had revenues of $2,250 and $43,143 for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Such revenues were primarily from consulting services, but also nominal materials sales. At August 31, 2017, our total current assets were $7,092, consisting solely of cash, and note receivable and our total current liabilities were $4,743. Our net loss for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2017 was $381,101.

OVERVIEW

Through proprietary use of materials and manufacturing technique, FairWind Energy is developing power sources drawing from renewable energy supply. We also use trade secrets and composite industry know-how to cross-market products into the oil & gas extraction industry.

We are a development stage corporation and have not yet generated or realized significant revenues from our business. We are involved in the design, engineering and manufacturing of composite products. The initial thrust of our business will be to supply products to the oil and gas industry. These products will include upstream production products such as sucker rods, fracking plugs, casings and other products where high temperature resistance, chemical resistance and a low weight to strength ratio products offer advantages to traditional materials (e.g., steel). If we are able to supply products to the oil and gas industry, then we plan to continue the development and sales of wind and solar hybrid energy systems. These systems also benefit from the use of higher performance materials (composites) and we will intend to incorporate them in product design and development.

Providing a reliable power source based on renewable energies required us to address shortcomings of existing technologies ranging from availability of supply (i.e., solar at night) to quality of componentry available (blades, stanchions, magnets). The hybridization of power sources (solar and wind) and manufacturing with next generation composite materials was the obvious solution.

From years of experience in the composite industry, our principals have refined the use of toughened resin systems ideal for the manufacture of structural and exposed components. An example would be the turbine blade. A leading cause of failure in wind turbines is the damage caused to the blades (even atop 100 meter towers) from blowing debris and rocks. We use toughened resin systems and reinforcements to eliminate this problem. The stanchion that supports the turbine and solar panels is typically galvanized steel. Again, using composites materials, our composite pole is stronger, lighter and non-conductive. Equally important, the composite needs no galvanization to protect against corrosion, eliminating hazardous waste products spent to the land, water and air.

A by-product of the use of toughened high-strength composites was the development of high-tensile products for infrastructure. Our composite products can prove good alternatives to steel and lower strength fiberglass/resin parts used in down-well drilling and pumping. An investment in superior materials and manufacturing technology allows for cross-marketing of these energy related products and from a business strategy perspective provides some security against fluctuating markets or reliance on single product lines.

The importance of the use of high quality material in the construction of composite parts cannot be overstated. Of equal importance (with respect to wind power) is the quality and design of the generator itself. Currently China supplies 95% of rare earth magnets – the key component of turbine generators. We have already established relationships and have tested generator prototypes of high quality from China. We are positioned to benefit from superior supply lines of essential materials almost exclusively available offshore. This supply challenge is now a Company asset.

Our offices are located at 32932 Pacific Coast Highway, #14-254, Dana Point, California 92629.

Potential Customers

While the opportunity for our products is global in scope, the main initial thrust of the company will be towards sales in North America. Several reasons exist for this strategy.

We believe that of paramount importance is the manufacture and delivery of quality products in a consistent and businesslike manner. We will have management in place domestically to insure an efficient business model. Additionally, the primary designs and specifications for the turbine/solar power generation will come domestically from us. With regards to high tensile products for infrastructure, the design, chemistry and raw materials all have R&D history in the U.S. And with burgeoning opportunities existing for prototyping, field trials, testing and sales to domestic energy companies (i.e., oil & gas) the initial focus will be to North American customers.

For wind and solar power generation, the likely end users are the biggest promoters of green energy – the government. Obvious choices include municipalities, transit authorities and other government agencies. Private construction projects seeking LEED Certification (Leadership in Energy & Environmental Design) are also likely targets. The benefits of solar/wind powered LED (light emitting diodes) lights are beyond media green energy hype. The benefits to being off-grid include hundreds of dollars per light due to elimination of trenching, wiring and purchased electricity cost. Off-grid eliminates landscaping issues and the LED lights further save in yearly maintenance. Finally, and something surely government entities can understand, this green energy often qualifies for rebates and subsidies.

The requirement for toughened resin systems and high strength parts for wind & solar systems has uncovered extraordinary potential in US energy markets. Specifically, the high strength reinforcements combined with high temperature / high shear resin for use in oil and gas extraction is a tremendous opportunity. New technology in this industry has allowed for discovery of new and large fields of gas and oil. Much of these energy finds require deeper more sophisticated drilling and pumping and that is precisely where these new high temperature resistance, high strength and chemical resistant composites perform best (superior to existing technology).

Hydraulic fracturing (fracking), which is a method of extraction that is not new, but is now pressing pumpers to extreme limits, is a technology that is in search of higher performing tooling and equipment. We believe that we could be well positioned to deal with the current and future high growth rates forecast for this high margin domestic industry. Forbes Magazine reports (Schlumberger Fattens Margins With Enhanced Fracking Technology – 09/26/2012) that the company is counting on new technology to drive growth – fracking capacity grew last year at 42% and is forecast to rise again by 28% this year.

We believe that we are in a unique position to make use of its know-how in composites to bring to market sought after high-technology composite products for oil & gas extraction and to service wind & solar power generation products.

Our Operations

We are an early stage company developing composite products for use in industries that require higher material properties than might be had from typical composite parts. Additionally, we are designing a small scale hybrid power source for low energy use.

In a priority project, we are currently near developmental completion of a high strength, high Tg (high temperature use) composite designed and intended to be used in the oil & gas industry. Intended for use in the exploration and production sector, we have manufactured nearly 5,000 feet of “sucker rod” used to be use in connection with the extraction of oil and gas from underground. The employed design uses proprietary resin systems that exceed typical temperature use limits of competing thermosetting systems. Additionally, utilizing higher tensile strength reinforcements, our parts can achieve higher operating loads, allowing for superior performance. New designs for mechanical joints in the rod string have also been completed. Significant testing has been completed on the final design (and will be continuing). We believe that the testing marks we have achieved to date are a result of the high performance materials and architecture of the product.

Our intended business operations will be to make use of our proprietary resin systems and unique composite architecture and apply that to other areas. With proof of concept via physical and field trial testing in hand, we will proceed to apply the proven benefits (see above) in other infrastructure projects. Two examples that are currently in the examination stage, include pultruded power poles suitable for supporting high voltage electrical transmission lines. Another early stage endeavor is second generation composite strength members for cable and conductor. As a replacement to more typical construction materials(e.g., steel, aluminum, concrete and even lower performing FRP) – we believe that our composite parts mix the benefits of strength, weight, corrosion resistance, non-conductivity and high temperature operation.

Another project in current development is a hybrid power generating system, incorporating both solar and wind power. Initially, we have purchased wind turbines and are in the process of combining them with solar panels. The first planned demonstration project will be to power street/parking lot lighting. The potential to independently operate off battery stored power, or to back-feed into the grid is possible. After vetting the POC prototypes, we intend to combine already-established supply chain lines for componentry with in-house manufactured composite elements (e.g., see power poles above). This hybrid power project gives us some business diversity, as well as a secondary market for our composite metrics.

A streamlined operation will initially support R&D and final development of both product lines (hybrid solar/wind power generation products & oil and gas pumping products and tooling). It is anticipated a facility of less than 10,000 SF for initial years’ development, production and assembly will adequately suffice. Composite blade prototyping and production and then assembly with imported generators and solar panels would occupy approximately 4,000 SF of space. The method of manufacturing high strength lineal strength members (sucker rods and down-well tubes) is referred to as “pultrusion”. This automated continuous process requires relatively little manpower, produces little waste and is considered the most efficient process in composite manufacturing. The initial machinery requirement would occupy a similar 4,000 SF. Within 2 years and upon completion of prototyping and early sales of both product lines, it will be our goal to expand domestically, as well as to consider foreign markets and lower cost manufacturing sites.

Marketing and Sales

We believe that consumer interest in green energy continues to grow. Finding viable uses that make sense on a sustainable business model will be a priority for FairWind Energy. Final development of hybrid wind/solar power supply will show a feasible low-cost, no direct subsidy product that can be taken to the consumer and light industrial market. “Becoming known” will be the marketing challenge. And to take this on will call for an aggressive presence at trade shows, well designed internet visibility and frequent participation in field trials. Equally important will be cultivating industry alliances and leveraging existing relationships.

The prove out for success in the oil and gas industry will be a combination of successful testing (lab and field trial) and strategically aligning with current successful and industry known operations. More focus on developing alliances and strategic partners will be the theme for growing the business. And more typical trade show, internet and media placement will also be utilized.

COMPETITION AND COMPETITIVE STRATEGY

Certainly competition exists in the market place for our product lines. The difference in our thrust will be that our products are technology driven and materially improved over earlier generation alternatives.

In the case of wind/solar lighting products, no domestic product has the established tie-in to direct sources of rare-earth magnets and quality low cost generators. The advanced blade design and high-tech material use will set the company apart from lesser quality poor designs. The package of low cost components / high-tech material and superior design is the bat to beat the competition with.

Specifically for down-hole pump products, such as, sucker rods, tubing, and fracking balls, we will have a strength, cost and survivability advantage over steel and first generation composite products. The depths that pumping equipment go to now almost preclude the use of steel (it does not have the strength to support its weight at these super long lengths). Capturing market share based on a superior product is the focus, but the capacity constraints of suppliers to the pumpers will enhance our position to a quicker entry and a larger presence.

PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, LICENSES, FRANCHISE RESTRICTIONS AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS & CONCESSIONS

We rely on a combination of trademark laws, trade secrets, confidentiality provisions and other contractual provisions to protect our proprietary rights, which are primarily our brand names, product designs and marks. We own three patents issued by the State Intellectual Property Office in China. The first patent (CN 102345406), related to composite poles is titled, “Poles for Supporting Electric Transmission Lines and a Method for Forming Such Poles is Provided” and expires July 18, 2030. The second patent (CN 202209068), related to composite material pole towers, is titled, “The Utility Model Discloses a Composite Material Pole Tower” and expires July 18, 2020. The third patent (CN 202111438), related to electrical transmission hardware, is titled, “Termination Hardware for Overhead Conductors” and expires February 3, 2022.

COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNMENT REGULATION

We will be required to comply with all regulations, rules and directives of governmental authorities and agencies applicable to the construction and operation of any facility in any jurisdiction which we would conduct activities.

We do not believe that government regulation will have a material impact on the way we conduct our business, however, any government regulation imposing greater fees for Internet use or restricting information exchange over the Internet could result in a decline in the use of the Internet and the viability of Internet-based services, which could harm our business and operating results.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES AND COSTS

We incurred $0 in research and development costs for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2017. By way of comparison, we incurred $3,692 in research and development costs for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2016.

EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

Michael Winterhalter and Eric Krogius (directors and officers), are our only 2 employees. Mr. Winterhalter currently works full time on Company matters.

FACILITIES

We currently do not rent any real property or offices. Our current business address is 32932 Pacific Coast Highway, #14-254, Dana Point, California 92629.

OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICES

Our executive offices are located at 32932 Pacific Coast Highway, #14-254, Dana Point, California 92629.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

As a “smaller reporting company,” as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, we are not required to provide the information called for by this Item.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Our current business address is 32932 Pacific Coast Highway, #14-254, Dana Point, California 92629. We believe that this space is adequate for our current needs. Our telephone number is (949) 933-5411.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not currently involved in any legal proceedings and we are not aware of any pending or potential legal actions.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

None.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS MARKET INFORMATION

Since August 4, 2015, our shares of common stock have been quoted on the OTCPink tier of the OTC Markets Group, Inc. under the stock symbol “FWDR”. The following table shows the reported high and low closing bid prices per share for our common stock based on information provided by the OTCQB. The over-the-counter market quotations set forth for our common stock reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

HOLDERS

As of August 31, 2017 the Company had 6,017,406 shares of common stock issued and outstanding held by approximately 40 holders of record.

DIVIDENDS

Historically, we have not paid any dividends to the holders of our common stock and we do not expect to pay any such dividends in the foreseeable future as we expect to retain our future earnings for use in the operation and expansion of our business.

TRANSFER AGENT

Our transfer agent is West Coast Stock Transfer, Inc. (“West Coast Stock Transfer”), whose address 721 N. Vulcan Ave, Encinitas, California 92024. West Coast Stock Transfer’s telephone number is (619) 664-4780.

RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

None.

SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

We have not established any compensation plans under which equity securities are authorized for issuance.

PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE REGISTRANT AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

We did not purchase any of our shares of common stock or other securities during the years ended August 31, 2017 and 2016.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

As a “smaller reporting company,” as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, we are not required to provide the information called for by this Item.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

OVERVIEW

The Company was incorporated on April 18, 2013 under the laws of the State of Nevada. The Company engages in composite design, engineering and manufacturing to be used in solar/wind hybrid power systems, oil and gas industry pumping and civil engineering and infrastructure products.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”). The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We have identified the policies below as critical to our business operations and to the understanding of our financial results:

Basis of Accounting

The Company’s financial statements are prepared using the accrual method of accounting and are presented in United States Dollars.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with maturities of one year or less to be cash equivalents.

Property and Equipment

Property and Equipment are recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the estimated useful lives of five (5) years.

Upon sale or retirement, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in the statements of operations.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("Paragraph 820-10-35-37") to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.

The carrying amounts of the Company's financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and payroll liabilities approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The Company does not expect the adoption of recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a significant impact on its results of operations, financial position or cash flow.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

For the year ended August 31, 2017, we generated revenues of $2,250, derived entirely from the sales of materials.

For the year ended August 31, 2016, we generated revenues of $43,143. The revenues are derived from consulting services of $40,000 and sales of materials for $3,143.

For the year ended August 31, 2017, we incurred operating expenses of $334,883, consisting of professional fees of $231,207, salary and wages of $80,000, and general and administrative expenses of $23,676. By way of comparison, for the year ended August 31, 2016, we incurred operating expenses of $334,218, consisting of professional fees of $177,797, research and development of $3,692, salary and wages of $129,718, and general and administrative expenses of $23,011.

We incurred net losses from operations of $333,990 and $292,432 for the years ended August 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The following table provides selected financial data about our company at August 31, 2017 and 2016.

GOING CONCERN

To date the Company only generated nominal revenues and consequently has incurred recurring losses from operations. We do not have sufficient funds to support our daily operations for the next 12 months. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on raising capital to fund our business plan and ultimately to attain profitable operations. Accordingly, these factors raise substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company is attempting to commence operations and generate sufficient revenue; however, the Company’s cash position may not be sufficient to support its daily operations. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to commence operations and generate sufficient revenue and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

At August 31, 2017, we had a cash balance of $3,688, total current liabilities of approximately $4,743. Total expenditures over the next 12 months are expected to be approximately $350,000, in order to complete our 12-month plan of operation, more fully described in the paragraph below. If we experience a shortage of funds prior to generating revenues from operations we may utilize funds from our director, who has informally agreed to advance funds to allow us to pay for operating costs, however they have no formal commitment, arrangement or legal obligation to advance or loan funds to us. Management believes our current cash balance will not be sufficient to fund our operations for the next twelve months.

PLAN OF OPERATION

We have not yet generated or realized any revenues from our business. We are involved in the design, engineering and manufacturing of composite products. The initial thrust of our business will be to supply products to the oil and gas industry. These products will include upstream production products such as sucker rods, fracking plugs, casings and other products where high temperature resistance, chemical resistance and a low weight to strength ratio products offer advantages to traditional materials (e.g., steel). If we are able to supply products to the oil and gas industry, then we plan to continue the development and sales of wind and solar hybrid energy systems. These systems also benefit from the use of higher performance materials (composites) and we will intend to incorporate them in product design and development.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

As a “smaller reporting company,” as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, we are not required to provide the information called for by this Item.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FairWind Energy, Inc.

August 31, 2017 and August 31, 2016

Index to the Financial Statements

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

FairWind Energy, Inc.

Dana Point, CA

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of FairWind Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) as of August 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ deficit and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of FairWind Energy, Inc. as of August 31, 2017 and 2016 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company suffered recurring losses from operations and has an accumulated deficit. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in this regard are described in Note 3. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Malone Bailey, LLP                      

www.malonebailey.com

Houston, Texas

December 14, 2017

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

FairWind Energy, Inc.

August 31, 2017 and 2016

Notes to the Financial Statements

Note 1 - Organization and Operations

FairWind Energy, Inc.

FairWind Energy, Inc. (the “Company”, “Fairwind Energy”) was incorporated on April 18, 2013 under the laws of the State of Nevada. The Company engages in composite design, engineering and manufacturing to be used in solar/wind hybrid power systems, oil and gas industry pumping and civil engineering and infrastructure products.

Formation of a 25% Equity Interest Entity

On October 26, 2013, the Company entered into a Joint Venture Contract with Xingcheng Haibao Advanced Materials Industrial Park Co., Ltd., a Chinese entity (the “Joint Venture Partner”) and on February 25, 2014 formed Xingcheng Sheng Kun Composite Co., Ltd. (“Sheng Kun” or “Joint Venture”), a corporation organized under the laws of the People’s Republic of China. The Joint Venture Partner is a composites manufacturer based in Huludao City, Liaoning Province, in China. The Company holds a 25% equity interest in the joint venture and the Joint Venture Partner holds the remaining 75% equity interest.

On March 13, 2016, the Company terminated involvement in the Joint Venture Contract through board resolution. As part of the termination the Company transferred the patents held to the Joint Venture. As part of the termination the Company recognized a loss of $3,205.

Note 2 - Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices

The management of the Company is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies and the appropriateness of accounting policies and their application. Critical accounting policies and practices are those that are both most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results and require management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company’s significant and critical accounting policies and practices are disclosed below as required by generally accepted accounting principles.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”), and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10-K and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes herein.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), aimed at making leasing activities more transparent and comparable. Topic 842 requires substantially all leases, including leases currently classified as operating leases, to be recognized by lessees on their balance sheet as a right-of-use asset and corresponding lease liability. This update is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with transition requiring lessees to recognize and measure leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this accounting standard on its financial statements and related disclosures.

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which outlines a single, comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance. This accounting standard was originally effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. ASU No. 2015-14 simply defers the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 to reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 for public entities and beginning after December 15, 2018 for all other entities with early adoption permitted for reporting periods after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this accounting standard on its financial statements and related disclosures.

Fiscal Year-End

The Company elected August 31st as its fiscal year ending date.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).

Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:

These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.

Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.

Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:

Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and payroll liabilities approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments. The long-term borrowings approximate fair value since the related rates of interest approximate current market rates.

Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm’s-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm’s-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.

Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company has adopted Section 360-10-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-17 an impairment loss shall be recognized only if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset (asset group). That assessment shall be based on the carrying amount of the asset (asset group) at the date it is tested for recoverability. An impairment loss shall be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) exceeds its fair value. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-20 if an impairment loss is recognized, the adjusted carrying amount of a long-lived asset shall be its new cost basis. For a depreciable long-lived asset, the new cost basis shall be depreciated (amortized) over the remaining useful life of that asset. Restoration of a previously recognized impairment loss is prohibited.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-21 the Company’s long-lived asset (asset group) is tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company considers the following to be some examples of such events or changes in circumstances that may trigger an impairment review: (a) significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset (asset group); (b) A significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a long-lived asset (asset group) is being used or in its physical condition; (c) A significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of a long-lived asset (asset group), including an adverse action or assessment by a regulator; (d) An accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of a long-lived asset (asset group); (e) A current-period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a long-lived asset (asset group); and (f) A current expectation that, more likely than not, a long-lived asset (asset group) will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life. The Company tests its long-lived assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 360-10-45-4 and 360-10-45-5 an impairment loss recognized for a long-lived asset (asset group) to be held and used shall be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in the income statement of a business entity. If a subtotal such as income from operations is presented, it shall include the amount of that loss. A gain or loss recognized on the sale of a long-lived asset (disposal group) that is not a component of an entity shall be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in the income statement of a business entity. If a subtotal such as income from operations is presented, it shall include the amounts of those gains or losses.

Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.

Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures

The Company accounts for investments in common stock or in-substance common stock (or both common stock and in-substance common stock) of an investee of which the Company has significant influence (see paragraph 323-10-15-6) in the operating or financial policies even though the Company holds 50% or less of the common stock or in-substance common stock, in accordance with sub-topic 323-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Sub-topic 323-10”).

Method of Accounting

Investments held in stock of entities other than subsidiaries, namely corporate joint ventures and other non-controlled entities usually are accounted for by one of three methods (i) the fair value method (addressed in Topic 320), (ii) the equity method (addressed in Topic 323), or (iii) the cost method (addressed in Subtopic 325-20). Pursuant to paragraph 323-10-05-5 the equity method tends to be most appropriate if an investment enables the investor to influence the operating or financial policies of the investee.

The Ability to Exercise Significant Influence

Pursuant to paragraph 323-10-15-6 the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of an investee may be indicated in several ways, including but not limited to the following: a. Representation on the board of directors, b. Participation in policy-making processes, c. Material intra-entity transactions, d. Interchange of managerial personnel, and e. Technological dependency. Pursuant to paragraph 323-10-15-8 an investment (direct or indirect) of 20 percent or more of the voting stock of an investee shall lead to a presumption that in the absence of predominant evidence to the contrary an investor has the ability to exercise significant influence over an investee. Conversely, an investment of less than 20 percent of the voting stock of an investee shall lead to a presumption that an investor does not have the ability to exercise significant influence unless such ability can be demonstrated.

Initial and Subsequent Measurement

Pursuant to Paragraph 323-10-30-2 an investor shall measure an investment in the common stock of an investee (including a joint venture) initially at cost in accordance with the guidance in Section 805-50-30. An investor shall initially measure, at fair value, a retained investment in the common stock of an investee (including a joint venture) in a deconsolidation transaction in accordance with paragraphs 810-10-40-3A through 40-5.

Pursuant to Section 323-10-35 under the equity method, an investor shall recognize its share of the earnings or losses of an investee in the periods for which they are reported by the investee in its financial statements rather than in the period in which an investee declares a dividend. An investor shall adjust the carrying amount of an investment for its share of the earnings or losses of the investee after the date of investment including adjustments similar to those made in preparing consolidated financial statements and shall report the recognized earnings or losses in income. An investor’s share of losses of an investee may equal or exceed the carrying amount of an investment accounted for by the equity method plus advances made by the investor. An equity method investor shall continue to report losses up to the investor’s investment carrying amount, including any additional financial support made or committed to by the investor and the investor ordinarily shall discontinue applying the equity method if the investment (and net advances) is reduced to zero and shall not provide for additional losses unless the investor has guaranteed obligations of the investee or is otherwise committed to provide further financial support for the investee. If the investee subsequently reports net income, the investor shall resume applying the equity method only after its share of that net income equals the share of net losses not recognized during the period the equity method was suspended. If a series of operating losses of an investee or other factors indicate that a decrease in value of the investment has occurred that is other than temporary the loss in value of an investment that is other than a temporary decline shall be recognized. Evidence of a loss in value might include, but would not necessarily be limited to, absence of an ability to recover the carrying amount of the investment or inability of the investee to sustain an earnings capacity that would justify the carrying amount of the investment. A current fair value of an investment that is less than its carrying amount may indicate a loss in value of the investment. However, a decline in the quoted market price below the carrying amount or the existence of operating losses alone is not necessarily indicative of a loss in value that is other than temporary.

Disclosure

Pursuant to paragraph 323-10-50-3 all of the following disclosures generally shall apply to the equity method of accounting for investments in common stock:

Computer Equipment

Computer equipment is recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the estimated useful lives of five (5) years.

Upon sale or retirement, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in the statements of operations.

Patents

The Company follows the guidelines as set out in paragraph 350-30-25-3 and paragraph 350-30-35-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for patents. For acquired patents the Company records the costs to acquire patents as patents and amortizes the patent acquisition costs over their remaining legal lives, or estimated useful lives, or the term of the contracts, whichever is shorter. For internally developed patents, all costs incurred to the point when a patent application is to be filed are expended as incurred as research and development expense; patent application costs, generally legal costs, thereafter incurred are capitalized, which are to be amortized once the patents are granted or expensed if the patent application is rejected. The Company amortizes the internally developed patents over the shorter of the expected useful lives or the legal lives of the patents, which are generally 17 to 20 years for domestic patents and 5 to 20 years for foreign patents from the date when the patents are granted. The costs of defending and maintaining patents are expended as incurred.

Upon becoming fully amortized, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.

Related Parties

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.

Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the related parties include a. affiliates (“Affiliate” means, with respect to any specified Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such Person, as such terms are used in and construed under Rule 405 under the Securities Act) of the Company; b. entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d. principal owners of the Company; e. management of the Company; f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b. a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.

Commitment and Contingencies

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed.

Revenue Recognition

The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

Research and Development

The Company follows paragraph 730-10-25-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 2 “Accounting for Research and Development Costs”) and paragraph 730-20-25-11 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 68 “Research and Development Arrangements”) for research and development costs. Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred. Research and development costs consist primarily of remuneration for material and testing costs for research and development.

Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision

The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”). Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.

The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.

Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.

Earnings per Share

Earnings per share (“EPS”) are the amount of earnings attributable to each share of common stock. For convenience, the term is used to refer to either earnings or loss per share. EPS is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-10 through 260-10-45-16, basic EPS shall be computed by dividing income available to common stockholders (the numerator) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding (the denominator) during the period. Income available to common stockholders shall be computed by deducting both the dividends declared in the period on preferred stock (whether or not paid) and the dividends accumulated for the period on cumulative preferred stock (whether or not earned) from income from continuing operations (if that amount appears in the income statement) and also from net income. The computation of diluted EPS is similar to the computation of basic EPS except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-45-21 through 260-10-45-45-23 Diluted EPS shall be based on the most advantageous conversion rate or exercise price from the standpoint of the security holder. The dilutive effect of outstanding call options and warrants (and their equivalents) issued by the reporting entity shall be reflected in diluted EPS by application of the treasury stock method unless the provisions of paragraphs 260-10-45-35 through 45-36 and 260-10-55-8 through 55-11 require that another method be applied. Equivalents of options and warrants include non-vested stock granted to employees, stock purchase contracts, and partially paid stock subscriptions (see paragraph 260–10–55–23). Anti-dilutive contracts, such as purchased put options and purchased call options, shall be excluded from diluted EPS. Under the treasury stock method: a. Exercise of options and warrants shall be assumed at the beginning of the period (or at time of issuance, if later) and common shares shall be assumed to be issued. b. The proceeds from exercise shall be assumed to be used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. (See paragraphs 260-10-45-29 and 260-10-55-4 through 55-5.) c. The incremental shares (the difference between the number of shares assumed issued and the number of shares assumed purchased) shall be included in the denominator of the diluted EPS computation.

There were potentially dilutive common shares in the form of outstanding warrants for the years ended August 31, 2017 and 2016. These shares relate to the consulting agreement discussed in Note 5 and were non-dilutive for the years ended August 31, 2017 and 2016.

Cash Flows Reporting

The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.

Stock-Based Payments

The Company recognizes all employee stock-based payments as a cost in the financial statements. Equity classified awards are measured at the grant date fair value of the award. The Company estimates grant date fair value for stock options using the Block-Scholes option pricing model.

To determine the fair value of stock warrants granted during the years ended August 31, 2017 and 2016 the Company used the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following weighted average assumptions.

The risk-free interest rate used is based on the implied yield on Treasury Constant Maturies with a remaining term equal to the expected term of the stock warrant. The expected dividend yield is zero as the Company has not paid cash dividends in the past and has no expectation of paying dividends in the foreseeable future. The expected volatility is calculated based on historical pattern of fluctuations in the common stock price. The Company determined the initial expected life based on the simplified method. The simplified method was used because the Company does not yet have enough history to establish an expected term based on actual forfeitures to date.

Derivative Liabilities

The Company evaluates its financial instruments and other contracts to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with ASC 815. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the embedded derivative is marked- to-market at each balance sheet date and recorded as a liability and the change in fair value is recorded in the statements of operations as other income or expense. Upon conversion or exercise of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the conversion date and then that fair value is reclassified to equity.

The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instruments that become subject to reclassification are reclassified at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not settlement of the derivative instrument is expected within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

From time to time, certain of the Company’s embedded conversion features on debt and outstanding warrants are treated as derivative liabilities for accounting purposes under ASC 815 due to insufficient authorized shares to fully settle conversion features of the instruments if exercised. These contracts were recognized at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings until such time as the conditions giving rise to such derivative liability classification were settled.

These derivative instruments did not trade in an active securities market. The Company used Black Scholes option pricing model to value derivative liabilities. This model used Level 3 inputs in the fair value hierarchy established by ASC 820 Fair Value Measurement.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts have been reclassified in the 2016 financial statements to conform to the current year presentation. There was no effect on the 2016 net loss.

Note 3 – Going Concern

The Company’s financial statements have been prepared assuming that it will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

As reflected in the financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit at August 31, 2017, a net loss, and net cash used in operating activities for the year then ended. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company is attempting to commence operations and generate sufficient revenue; however, the Company’s cash position may not be sufficient to support its daily operations. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to commence operations and generate sufficient revenue and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Note 4 – Related Party Transactions

Free Office Space

The Company has been provided office space by Michael Winterhalter, Chief Executive Officer, at no cost. Management determined that such cost is nominal and did not recognize the rent expense in its financial statement.

Convertible Note Payable

The Company issued a convertible promissory note on September 23, 2016 to William C. Winterhalter, Michael Winterhalter’s father, in the amount of $20,000. The interest rate is 8% and the maturity date is September 23, 2019 in which all outstanding principal together with interest on this note shall be due. The outstanding note and accrued interest convert at the option of the holder or the Company at the volume weighted average price of the common stock for the preceding 10 days (10-day VWAP). On March 1, 2017 this note was amended to introduce a conversion floor of $0.10 on the 10-day VWAP. This amendment extinguished the conditions that generated derivative liabilities related to this note. The debt under this agreement remains as the agreement did not qualify for debt extinguishment.

A derivative liability related to the embedded conversion option of $13,932 was recognized as a debt discount at the date of issuance of the note. As discussed in the preceding paragraph and in Note 6, the conditions that generated the derivative liability related to the related party note was extinguished on March 1, 2017 and $12,160 was transferred to “Loss on fair value of derivative instruments”. The decrease in fair value of the derivative liability of the related party convertible note payable for the year ended August 31, 2017 and August 31, 2016 was $13,932 and $0, respectively, and is included in “Loss on fair value of derivative instruments” on the accompanying statements of operations. Amortization of the discount on related party convertible note payable was $4,351 and $0 for the year ended August 31, 2017 and August 31, 2016, respectively, and is included in “interest expense” in the accompanying statements of operations.

The Company also issued convertible promissory notes on March 3, 2017, April 28, 2017, July 10, 2017 and August 31, 2017 in amounts of $20,000, $10,000, $4,000 and $10,000 respectively, to Michael Winterhalter. All four notes mature on their third anniversary with interest payable at 8% per annum. The outstanding notes and accrued interest convert at the option of the holder or the Company at the volume weighted average price of the common stock for the preceding 10 days, with a conversion floor of $0.10 on the 10-day VWAP. The Company evaluated the conversion options of the convertible promissory notes for embedded derivatives and beneficial conversion features determining the conversion options to contain neither.

Note 5 – Equity

Shares Authorized

Upon formation the total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Company is authorized to issue is Seventy-Five Million (75,000,000) shares of which Twenty Five Million (25,000,000) shares shall be Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share, and Fifty Million (50,000,000) shares shall be Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share.

Stock Options Plan

In February 2016, the Board of Directors approved the 2016 Stock Options Plan (“Plan”) that provides for the granting of stock options to certain key employees. The Plan reserves 2,000,000 shares of common stock for this purpose. There is no provision for shares to be specifically granted to the CEO under his employment arrangement, either in the stock option plan or the employment agreement.

Options under the Plan are to be granted at no less than fair market value of the shares at the date of grant. As of August 31, 2017 and 2016 no options under this plan have been granted.

Consulting Agreement

On March 14, 2016, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Steve Moore for consulting services related to develop business and advise management of technology, products and services used in the oil and gas exploration and production. This agreement combines commissions payable on gross profit, as well as a warrant of company stock. The cost of these benefits is estimated at $250,000 over 2 years. As of August 31, 2017, 125,000 warrants of company stock are outstanding under this agreement. Costs associated with the warrant issuances are included in “Professional fees” in the accompanying statements of operations in the amount of $173,462 and $155,166 for the years ended August 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Following is a summary of warrant activity during 2017 and 2016:

Following is a summary of non-vested warrant activity during 2017 and 2016:

The fair market value of stock warrants is determined using the Black-Scholes valuation model, and the company uses the following methods to determine its underlying assumptions: expected volatilities are based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock; the expected term of warrants granted are based on the simplified method; and the risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury implied yield on zero-coupon issues (with a remaining term equal to the expected term of the warrant).

As of August 31, 2017, there was no unrecognized stock warrant cost related to unvested stock warrant awards as all awards have fully vested. As of August 31, 2017, all 125,000 warrants were exercisable.

During the year ended August 31, 2017, $163,718 of previously recognized expense was reclassified from equity to a derivative liability related to outstanding fully-vested common stock warrants. As discussed in Notes 4 and 6, the conditions that generated the derivative liabilities related to the warrants were extinguished on March 1, 2017 and $228,678 was transferred to paid-in capital. The increase in the fair value of the derivative liabilities generated by tainted warrants for the year ended August 31, 2017 was $64,959 and is included in “Loss on fair value of derivative instruments” in the accompanying statements of operations.

Waived Compensation

The Company and Michael Winterhalter collectively waived payment in the amount of $60,000 and $55,000 for the years ended August 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Waived compensation expense is included in payroll expense in the accompanying Statements of Operations.

The Company and Eric Krogius collectively waived payment in the amount of $20,000 and $16,668 for the years ended August 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Waived compensation expense is included in payroll expense in the accompanying Statements of Operations. These amounts are treated as capital contributions in the accompanying Statements of Cash Flow.

Note 6 – Notes Receivable and Convertible Note Payable

The Company issued a note receivable on September 28, 2016 in the amount of $10,000 to Black Diamond Bits, LLC. The interest rate is 8% and the principal and interest will be due in its entirety on January 1, 2017 for a total amount of $10,710. As of August 31, 2017 Black Diamond has not consummated the sale of their business, which had been the trigger for Black Diamond Bits, LLC to fully pay their obligation. Two interest payments have been made to date of $291 and $193 in April and June 2017, respectively. Communications with Black Diamond management indicate repayment of the note may come from sales revenue. Fairwind Energy has sent this note to collections and has reserved against credit losses on the note in the amount of $7,226. This is based on the collection agency’s historically collects rate, average of 85% collections, weighted against management’s estimate.

The Company issued a convertible promissory note on October 1, 2016 to Julie Cameron Down Revocable Trust in the amount of $25,000. The interest rate is 8% and the maturity date is September 30, 2019 in which all outstanding principal together with interest on this note shall be due. The outstanding note and accrued interest convert at the option of the holder or the Company at the volume weighted average price of the common stock for the preceding 10 days (10-day VWAP). On March 1, 2017 this note was amended to introduce a conversion floor of $0.10 on the 10-day VWAP. This amendment extinguished the conditions that generated derivative liabilities related to this note.

A derivative liability related to the embedded conversion option of $17,258 was recognized as a debt discount at the date of issuance of the note. As discussed in the preceding paragraph and in Note 4, the conditions that generated the derivative liability related to the related party note were extinguished on March 1, 2017 and $15,245 was transferred to “Loss on fair value of derivative instruments”. The decrease in fair value of the derivative liability of the convertible note payable for the year ended August 31, 2017 was $17,258 and is included in “Loss on fair value of derivative instruments” on the accompanying statements of operations. Amortization of the discount on convertible note payable was $5,269 for the year ended August 31, 2017 and is included in “interest expense” in the accompanying statements of operations. The debt under this agreement remains as the agreement did not qualify for debt extinguishment.

Notes Payable consist of the following as of August 31, 2017:

Maturities of notes payable for each of the fiscal years subsequent to August 31, 2017 are as follows:

Note 7 – Derivative Liabilities

Derivative liabilities consist of derivative convertible notes and tainted warrants. When initially valued, using a Black Scholes valuation method, the derivative convertible notes were valued at $31,190, and tainted warrants valued at $163,718.

To determine the fair value of notes/warrants granted during each year under the Black Scholes model using the following range of assumptions:

As discussed in Notes 4 and 6, the conditions generating the derivative liabilities were extinguished as of August 31, 2017, therefore there were no derivative liabilities as of August 31, 2017.

Level 3 Gains and Losses

The following table sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 derivative liabilities for the year ended August 31, 2017:

Note 8 – Commitments and contingent liabilities

Employment Agreements

Employment Agreement – Michael Winterhalter, CEO

On April 30, 2014, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Michael Winterhalter (“the Employee”). Key terms of the agreement are as follows:

Term

The employment of the Employee shall commence on and continue for an indefinite term until terminated in accordance with the provisions of the agreement.

Compensation

In consideration of the services to be provided, the Employee, during the term of his employment, shall be paid a base salary of $60,000 per year in equal monthly installments, in arrears, less applicable statutory deductions. In addition, the Employee is entitled to receive benefits in accordance with the Employer’s standard benefit package, as amended from time to time. During the fiscal year ended August 31, 2016, $8,000 in payments have been made. The Company and the Employee collectively waived payment above in the amount of $60,000 and 55,000 for the years ended August 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Waived compensation expense (see Note 5) is included in payroll expense in the accompanying Statement of Operations.

Termination

Subsequent to completion of the probationary term of employment, the Employer may terminate the employment of the Employee at any time:

The Employee may terminate his employment at any time by providing the Employer with at least eight (8) weeks advance notice of his intention to resign.

Employment Agreement – Eric Krogius, Director

On April 30, 2014, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Eric Krogius (“the Director”) with the same terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement with Michael Winterhalter except the following:

Compensation

In consideration of the services to be provided, the Director, during the term of his employment, shall be paid a base salary of $20,000 per year in equal monthly installments, in arrears, less applicable statutory deductions. In addition, the Director is entitled to receive benefits in accordance with the Employer’s standard benefit package, as amended from time to time. During the fiscal year ended August 31, 2016, $3,333 in payments have been made. The Company and the Director collectively waived payment above in the amount of $20,000 and $16,668 for the years ended August 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Waived compensation expense (see Note 5) is included in payroll expense in the accompanying Statement of Operations.

Note 9 – Concentrations and Credit Risk

Customers and Credit Concentrations

One and two customers accounted for all of the total revenue during the years ended August 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. A reduction in sales from or loss of such customers would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

Note 10 – Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision

Deferred Tax Assets

At August 31, 2017, the Company had net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes of $635,785 that may be offset against future taxable income through 2036. No tax benefit has been recorded with respect to these net operating loss carry-forwards in the accompanying financial statements as the management of the Company believes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets of approximately $216,200 was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by the full valuation allowance.

Deferred tax assets consist primarily of the tax effect of NOL carry-forwards. The Company has provided a full valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets because of the uncertainty regarding its realization. The valuation allowance decreased by $31,281 and $100,516 for the years ended August 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Components of deferred tax assets are as follows:

Income Tax Provision in the Statements of Operations

A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate and the effective income tax rate as a percentage of loss before income taxes is as follows:

The Company's income tax filings are subject to audit by various taxing authorities. The Company's open audit periods are August 30, 2015 to the current year.

Note 11 – Investment in a Non-consolidated Entity

On October 26, 2013, the Company entered into a Joint Venture Contract for a Sino-Foreign Composites Company with Xingcheng Haibao Advanced Materials Industrial Park Co., Ltd., a Chinese entity (the “Joint Venture Partner”). The Joint Venture Partner is a composites manufacturer based in Huludao City, Liaoning Province, in China. The Company holds a 25% equity interest in the joint venture and the Joint Venture Partner holds the remaining 75% equity interest.

The Company measured its investment in the common stock of the joint venture at zero, the cost of its contributed technology, in accordance with the guidance in ASC Section 805-50-30.

The Joint Venture is devoting all of its efforts on establishing the business but with minimal activities as of March 14, 2016, the date of termination of the Joint Venture Contract, and for the reporting period then ended, the Company discontinued applying the equity method and the investment (and net advances) was reduced to zero. The Company did not guarantee obligations of the investee or otherwise commit to provide further financial support for the investee.

Note 12 – Patent

The Company started its Chinese patent application process on May 7, 2013 and obtained the China patent on September 11, 2013. Patent application costs of $3,814, primarily legal costs, incurred during the patent application process were capitalized and are being amortized over the expected useful life of 15 years from the date of grant of the patent.

(i) Transfer of Patent

As part of the termination of the Joint Venture Contract on March 14, 2016, all patents held by the Company were transferred to the Joint Venture, and a loss of $3,205 was recorded during the year ended August 31, 2016.

(ii) Amortization Expense

Amortization expense was $189 for the year ended August 31, 2016.

Note 13 – Subsequent Events

The Company issued a convertible promissory note on November 1, 2017 to Michael A. Winterhalter, CEO, in the amount of $10,000. The interest rate is 8% and the maturity date is October 31, 2020 in which all outstanding principal together with interest on this note shall be due. The option to convert is based on the volume weighted average price of the common stock for the preceding 10 days (10-day VWAP).

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, we are responsible for conducting an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our internal controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the fiscal year covered by this report. Disclosure controls and procedures means that the material information required to be included in our Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms relating to our company, including any consolidating subsidiaries, and was made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period when this report was being prepared. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded as of the evaluation date that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of August 31, 2017.

MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

As of August 31, 2017, management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s President and Chief Financial Officer and effected by the Company’s Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP in the United States of America and includes those policies and procedures that:

In evaluating the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, our management used the criteria set forth by the 2013 version of Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework. Based on that evaluation, completed only by Michael Winterhalter, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and a director, who also serves as our principal financial officer and principal accounting officer, Mr. Winterhalter concluded that, during the period covered by this report, such internal controls and procedures were not effective to detect the inappropriate application of US GAAP rules as more fully described below.

This was due to deficiencies that existed in the design or operation of our internal controls over financial reporting that adversely affected our internal controls and that may be considered to be material weaknesses. The matters involving internal controls and procedures that our management considered to be material weaknesses under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board were: (i) lack of a functioning audit committee due to a lack of a majority of independent members and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures; (ii) inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives; and (iii) ineffective controls over period end financial disclosure and reporting processes. The aforementioned material weaknesses were identified by Mr. Winterhalter, our President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director, who also serves as our principal financial officer and principal accounting officer, in connection with the review of our financial statements as of August 31, 2017.

Management believes that the lack of a functioning audit committee and the lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors results in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures, which could result in a material misstatement in our financial statements in future periods.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING.

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of the year ended August 31, 2017 that have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Our executive officers and directors and their respective ages as of August 31, 2017 are as follows:

The directors named above will serve until the next annual meeting of the stockholders or until their respective resignation or removal from office. Thereafter, directors are anticipated to be elected for one-year terms at the annual stockholders’ meeting. Officers will hold their positions at the pleasure of the Board of Directors, absent any employment agreement, of which none currently exists or is contemplated.

Set forth below is a brief description of the background and business experience of our executive officers and directors for the past five years.

Michael Winterhalter

Michael Winterhalter, has served as our President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Chairman of the Board of Directors since April 18, 2013. He also served as our Secretary from April 18, 2013 until June 2, 2013. Mr. Winterhalter has over 25 years’ experience in the composites industry with notable tenures that include President of AmpStar, LLC (Harbor City, California), from November 2008 until July 2014. From June 2001 until January 2004, Mr. Winterhalter was employed at W. Brandt Goldsworthy & Associates in Los Angeles, where became Vice President of Business Development in January 2002. Since August 2008, he has been a member of Winter Composites, LLC. He holds 2 patents (with an additional 1 in pending status); one for design of high voltage overhead transmission conductors utilizing a high strength composite central strength member and another for a novel manufacturing method for composite power poles. Mr. Winterhalter graduated from the University of California, Santa Barbara and also served as a Congressional Intern in the US House of Representatives. Mr. Winterhalter’s entrepreneurial desire evidenced by his ideas which led to the establishment of our business, and his experience in the composited industry, led to our conclusion that Mr. Winterhalter should be serving as a member of our Board of Directors in light of our business and structure.

Scott Thomas

Mr. Thomas has served as our Vice President, Secretary and a Director since June 2, 2013. Mr. Thomas has over 25 years’ experience in industrial/technical sales and product development. Since August 1994, Mr. Thomas has been a Regional Director of Donaldson Company Inc., an S&P Midcap-400 corporation that specializes in engineered filtration products and ‘green’ solutions for industry. Mr. Thomas graduated from California Polytechnic State University (Cal Poly) San Luis Obispo. Mr. Thomas’s sales experience led to our conclusion that Mr. Thomas should be serving as a member of our Board of Directors in light of our business and structure.

Eric Krogius

Mr. Krogius has served as a Director since June 2, 2013. Mr. Krogius has over 18 years’ experience in the equity investment and securities industry. Since November 2016, Mr. Krogius has been a Senior Institutional Sales Trader at Roth Capital Partners. From July 2013 to October 2016, Mr. Krogius was Senior Vice President at Seaport Global Securities. In the mid-1990s, he was Managing Director, Director of Trading for Roth Capital Partners. Most recently, he was a partner for Los Angeles-based Crowell Weedon and Company from January 2001 until May 2013. Prior to his securities career he owned and operated a string of retail stores in the Los Angeles area. Mr. Krogius graduated from the University of California Los Angeles. Mr. Krogius’ background in the broker-dealer industry led to our conclusion that Mr. Krogius should be serving as a member of our Board of Directors in light of our business and structure.

Robert Drust

Mr. Drust has served as a Director since June 2, 2013. Mr. Drust has over 20 years’ experience in the equity investment and trading industry. Mr. Drust is presently Executive Director at MKM Partners, a position which he has held since April 2017. From August 2013 until March 2016, Mr. Drust was a Senior Equity Trader at B. Riley & Co. Starting in the early 1990s, he worked at Wertheim Schroder, Prudential Securities and later at Wellington Management. Most recently, Mr. Drust was a partner at Crowell Weedon, where he was in charge of the Institutional Equity Trading Department and dealt with some of the largest Mutual funds and Hedge funds in the country, from November 2005 until June 2013. Mr. Drust graduated from Rider University and holds a MBA from Pepperdine.

TERM OF OFFICE

All directors hold office until the next annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. The Company’s Bylaws provide that the Board of Directors will consist of no less than three members. Officers are elected by and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Our board of directors is currently composed of four members, none of whom qualify as independent directors in accordance with the published listing requirements of the NASDAQ Global Market (the Company has no plans to list on the NASDAQ Global Market). The NASDAQ independence definition includes a series of objective tests, such as that the director is not, and has not been for at least three years, one of our employees and that neither the director, nor any of his family members has engaged in various types of business dealings with us. In addition, our board of directors has not made a subjective determination as to our director that no relationships exist which, in the opinion of our board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director, though such subjective determination is required by the NASDAQ rules. Had our board of directors made these determinations, our board of directors would have reviewed and discussed information provided by our director and us with regard to our director’s business and personal activities and relationships as they may relate to us and our management.

CERTAIN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

No director, person nominated to become a director, executive officer, promoter or control person of our company has, during the last ten years: (i) been convicted in or is currently subject to a pending a criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses); (ii) been a party to a civil proceeding of a judicial or administrative body of competent jurisdiction and as a result of such proceeding was or is subject to a judgment, decree or final order enjoining future violations of, or prohibiting or mandating activities subject to any federal or state securities or banking or commodities laws including, without limitation, in any way limiting involvement in any business activity, or finding any violation with respect to such law, nor (iii) any bankruptcy petition been filed by or against the business of which such person was an executive officer or a general partner, whether at the time of the bankruptcy or for the two years prior thereto.

SIGNIFICANT EMPLOYEES AND CONSULTANTS

Other than our officers and directors, we currently have no other significant employees.

AUDIT COMMITTEE AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Since we do not have an audit or compensation committee comprised of independent directors, the functions that would have been performed by such committees are performed by our directors. The Board of Directors has not established an audit committee and does not have an audit committee financial expert, nor has the Board of Directors established a nominating committee. The Board is of the opinion that such committees are not necessary since the Company is an early development stage company and has only two directors, and to date, such directors have been performing the functions of such committees. Thus, there is a potential conflict of interest in that our directors and officers have the authority to determine issues concerning management compensation, nominations, and audit issues that may affect management decisions.

There are no family relationships among our directors or officers. Other than as described above, we are not aware of any other conflicts of interest with any of our executive officers or directors.

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities, file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Executive officers, directors and greater-than-ten percent stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based on our review of filings made on the SEC website, and the fact of us not receiving certain forms or written representations from certain reporting persons that they have complied with the relevant filing requirements, we believe that, during the year ended August 31, 2017, our executive officers, directors and greater-than-ten percent stockholders complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements.

STOCKHOLDER COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

We have not implemented a formal policy or procedure by which our stockholders can communicate directly with our Board of Directors. Nevertheless, every effort has been made to ensure that the views of stockholders are heard by the Board of Directors or individual directors, as applicable, and that appropriate responses are provided to stockholders in a timely manner. We believe that we are responsive to stockholder communications, and therefore have not considered it necessary to adopt a formal process for stockholder communications with our Board. During the upcoming year, our Board will continue to monitor whether it would be appropriate to adopt such a process.

CODE OF ETHICS

The Company has not adopted a code of ethics that applies to its principal executive officers, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The table below summarizes all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our Officers for all services rendered in all capacities to us as of the year ended August 31, for the fiscal years ended as indicated.

______________

STOCK OPTION GRANTS

The following table sets forth certain information concerning outstanding stock awards held by our officers and our directors as of the fiscal years ended August 31, 2017 and 2016: