AGREE REALTY CORP - Quarter Report: 2011 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
Mark One
x
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
OR
¨
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
For the transition period from __________ to __________
Commission File Number 1-12928
Agree Realty Corporation
|
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
Maryland
|
38-3148187
|
(State or other jurisdiction
|
(I.R.S. Employer
|
of incorporation or organization)
|
Identification No.)
|
31850 Northwestern Highway, Farmington Hills, Michigan
|
48334
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip code)
|
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (248) 737-4190
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x
|
No ¨
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes x
|
No ¨
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer ¨
|
Accelerated Filer x
|
Non-accelerated Filer ¨
|
Smaller reporting company ¨
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨
|
No x
|
As of November 3, 2011, the Registrant had 9,851,914 shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value, outstanding.
Agree Realty Corporation
Form 10-Q
Index
Page
|
||
Part I:
|
Financial Information
|
|
Item 1.
|
Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2011 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2010
|
1-2
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited) for the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
|
3
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited) for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
|
4
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited) for the nine months ended September 30, 2011
|
5
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
|
6-7
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
8-16
|
|
Item 2.
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
17-25
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
26
|
Item 4.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
26
|
Part II:
|
Other Information
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
27
|
Item 1A.
|
Risk Factors
|
27-28
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
28
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
|
28
|
Item 4.
|
{Removed and Reserved}
|
28
|
Item 5
|
Other Information
|
28
|
Item 6.
|
Exhibits
|
29
|
Signatures
|
30
|
Part I – Financial Information
Item 1 – Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
Agree Realty Corporation
Consolidated Balance Sheets
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Real Estate Investments
|
||||||||
Land
|
$ | 106,695,191 | $ | 103,693,227 | ||||
Buildings
|
225,795,912 | 227,645,287 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation
|
(70,613,083 | ) | (66,111,215 | ) | ||||
261,878,020 | 265,227,299 | |||||||
Property under development
|
420,518 | 359,299 | ||||||
Property held for sale, net
|
— | 6,522,821 | ||||||
Net Real Estate Investments
|
262,298,538 | 272,109,419 | ||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
886,787 | 593,281 | ||||||
Accounts Receivable - Tenants, net of allowance of $35,000 at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
|
2,669,506 | 1,330,129 | ||||||
Unamortized Deferred Expenses
|
||||||||
Financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $5,584,486 and $5,392,802 at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively
|
1,012,294 | 1,133,194 | ||||||
Leasing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $1,175,117 and $934,399 at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively
|
722,174 | 812,295 | ||||||
Lease intangibles costs, net of accumulated amortization of $429,369 and $50,479 at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 respectively
|
13,531,175 | 8,152,248 | ||||||
Other Assets
|
902,043 | 911,801 | ||||||
$ | 282,022,517 | $ | 285,042,367 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
1
Agree Realty Corporation
Consolidated Balance Sheets
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
||||||||
Mortgages Payable
|
$ | 65,706,733 | $ | 71,526,780 | ||||
Notes Payable
|
43,384,904 | 28,380,254 | ||||||
Dividends and Distributions Payable
|
4,068,677 | 5,145,740 | ||||||
Deferred Revenue
|
2,510,008 | 9,345,754 | ||||||
Accrued Interest Payable
|
474,429 | 221,154 | ||||||
Accounts Payable
|
||||||||
Capital expenditures
|
54,321 | 286,078 | ||||||
Operating
|
1,635,662 | 1,427,718 | ||||||
Interest Rate Swap
|
759,200 | 793,211 | ||||||
Deferred Income Taxes
|
705,000 | 705,000 | ||||||
Tenant Deposits
|
93,234 | 80,402 | ||||||
Total Liabilities
|
119,392,168 | 117,912,091 | ||||||
Stockholders’ Equity
|
||||||||
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 13,350,000 shares authorized, 9,851,914 and 9,759,014 shares issued and outstanding, respectively
|
986 | 976 | ||||||
Excess stock, $0.0001 par value, 6,500,000 shares authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding
|
— | — | ||||||
Series A junior participating preferred stock, $0.0001 par value, 150,000 shares authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding
|
— | — | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital
|
180,747,115 | 179,705,353 | ||||||
Deficit
|
(20,089,451 | ) | (14,702,252 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
(731,884 | ) | (764,735 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders’ equity—Agree Realty Corporation
|
159,926,766 | 164,239,342 | ||||||
Non-controlling interest
|
2,703,583 | 2,890,934 | ||||||
Total Stockholders’ Equity
|
162,630,349 | 167,130,276 | ||||||
$ | 282,022,517 | $ | 285,042,367 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
Agree Realty Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
Three Months Ended
|
Three Months Ended
|
|||||||
September 30, 2011
|
September 30, 2010
|
|||||||
Revenues
|
||||||||
Minimum rents
|
$ | 14,269,539 | $ | 8,137,049 | ||||
Percentage rents
|
564 | 7,843 | ||||||
Operating cost reimbursements
|
849,146 | 590,089 | ||||||
Development fee income
|
- | 47,000 | ||||||
Other income
|
28,132 | 28,093 | ||||||
Total Revenues
|
15,147,381 | 8,810,074 | ||||||
Operating Expenses
|
||||||||
Real estate taxes
|
870,568 | 455,382 | ||||||
Property operating expenses
|
377,777 | 396,900 | ||||||
Land lease payments
|
254,703 | 96,825 | ||||||
General and administrative
|
1,092,809 | 1,150,538 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
1,909,438 | 1,437,439 | ||||||
Impairment charge
|
13,500,000 | - | ||||||
Total Operating Expenses
|
18,005,295 | 3,537,084 | ||||||
Income (Loss) From Operations
|
(2,857,914 | ) | 5,272,990 | |||||
Other Income (Expense)
|
||||||||
Interest expense, net
|
(1,357,661 | ) | (1,097,823 | ) | ||||
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
2,360,231 | - | ||||||
Income (Loss) Before Discontinued Operations
|
(1,855,344 | ) | 4,175,167 | |||||
Gain (loss) on sale of asset from discontinued operations
|
- | - | ||||||
Income from discontinued operations
|
- | 365,401 | ||||||
Net Income (Loss)
|
(1,855,344 | ) | 4,540,568 | |||||
Less Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Non-Controlling Interest
|
61,823 | (148,960 | ) | |||||
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Agree Realty Corporation
|
$ | (1,793,521 | ) | $ | 4,391,608 | |||
Earnings Per Share – Basic
|
$ | (0.19 | ) | $ | 0.46 | |||
Earnings Per Share – Dilutive
|
$ | (0.19 | ) | $ | 0.46 | |||
Dividend Declared Per Share
|
$ | 0.40 | $ | 0.51 | ||||
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding – Basic
|
9,635,835 | 9,580,928 | ||||||
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding – Dilutive
|
9,666,791 | 9,618,240 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
Agree Realty Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||
September 30, 2011
|
September 30, 2010
|
|||||||
Revenues
|
||||||||
Minimum rents
|
$ | 31,620,261 | $ | 23,979,020 | ||||
Percentage rents
|
21,972 | 20,842 | ||||||
Operating cost reimbursements
|
2,350,082 | 1,900,483 | ||||||
Development fee income
|
894,693 | 582,904 | ||||||
Other income
|
111,682 | 62,696 | ||||||
Total Revenues
|
34,998,690 | 26,545,945 | ||||||
Operating Expenses
|
||||||||
Real estate taxes
|
2,276,250 | 1,452,046 | ||||||
Property operating expenses
|
1,187,197 | 1,122,616 | ||||||
Land lease payments
|
736,567 | 290,475 | ||||||
General and administrative
|
4,055,730 | 3,604,296 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
5,158,106 | 4,175,992 | ||||||
Impairment charge
|
13,500,000 | - | ||||||
Total Operating Expenses
|
26,913,850 | 10,645,425 | ||||||
Income From Operations
|
8,084,840 | 15,900,520 | ||||||
Other Expense
|
||||||||
Interest expense, net
|
(3,868,838 | ) | (3,491,709 | ) | ||||
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
2,360,231 | - | ||||||
Income Before Discontinued Operations
|
6,576,233 | 12,408,811 | ||||||
Gain on sale of asset from discontinued operations
|
- | 5,328,333 | ||||||
Income from discontinued operations
|
91,816 | 1,203,364 | ||||||
Net Income
|
6,668,049 | 18,940,508 | ||||||
Less Net Income Attributable to Non-Controlling Interest
|
(228,630 | ) | (691,413 | ) | ||||
Net Income Attributable to Agree Realty Corporation
|
$ | 6,439,419 | $ | 18,249,095 | ||||
Earnings Per Share – Basic
|
$ | .67 | $ | 2.03 | ||||
Earnings Per Share – Dilutive
|
$ | .67 | $ | 2.02 | ||||
Dividend Declared Per Share
|
$ | 1.20 | $ | 1.53 | ||||
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding – Basic
|
9,632,744 | 9,000,649 | ||||||
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding – Dilutive
|
9,669,349 | 9,034,629 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Agree Realty Corporation
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited)
Additional
|
Accumulated
Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock
|
Paid-In
|
Non-Controlling
|
Comprehensive
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Interest
|
Deficit
|
Income (loss)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance, January 1, 2011
|
9,759,014 | $ | 976 | $ | 179,705,353 | $ | 2,890,934 | $ | (14,702,252 | ) | $ | (764,735 | ) | |||||||||||
Issuance of shares under the Equity Incentive Plan
|
105,050 | 10 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Forfeiture of shares
|
(12,150 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Vesting of restricted stock
|
— | — | 1,041,762 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends and distributions declared for the period January 1, 2011 to September 30, 2011
|
— | — | — | (417,141 | ) | (11,826,618 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
— | — | — | 1,160 | — | 32,851 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income for the period January 1, 2011 to September 30, 2011
|
— | — | — | 228,630 | 6,439,419 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance, September 30, 2011
|
9,851,914 | $ | 986 | $ | 180,747,115 | $ | 2,703,583 | $ | (20,089,451 | ) | $ | (731,884 | ) |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
Agree Realty Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||
September 30, 2011
|
September 30, 2010
|
|||||||
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
|
||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 6,668,049 | $ | 18,940,508 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
|
||||||||
Depreciation
|
4,538,498 | 4,333,591 | ||||||
Amortization
|
811,292 | 266,258 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation
|
1,041,762 | 864,000 | ||||||
Impairment charge
|
13,500,000 | - | ||||||
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
(2,360,231 | ) | - | |||||
Gain on sale of asset
|
- | (5,328,333 | ) | |||||
(Increase) Decrease in accounts receivable
|
(1,339,377 | ) | 1,191,299 | |||||
(Increase) Decrease in other assets
|
81,064 | (728,226 | ) | |||||
(Increase) Decrease in accounts payable
|
205,451 | (705,142 | ) | |||||
Decrease in deferred revenue
|
(6,835,746 | ) | (517,162 | ) | ||||
Increase (Decrease) in accrued interest
|
253,275 | 785 | ||||||
Increase (Decrease) in tenant deposits
|
12,832 | (13,483 | ) | |||||
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities
|
16,576,869 | 18,304,095 | ||||||
Cash Flows From Investing Activities
|
||||||||
Acquisition of real estate investments (including capitalized interest of $-0- in 2011 and $288,477 in 2010)
|
(20,525,240 | ) | (21,051,638 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of asset
|
6,522,821 | 9,761,445 | ||||||
Payments of leasing costs
|
(150,597 | ) | (87,797 | ) | ||||
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities
|
(14,153,016 | ) | (11,377,990 | ) | ||||
Cash Flows From Financing Activities
|
||||||||
Proceeds from common stock offering
|
- | 31,072,752 | ||||||
Payments of mortgages payable
|
(3,459,816 | ) | (2,993,427 | ) | ||||
Dividends and limited partners’ distributions paid
|
(13,318,319 | ) | (13,901,489 | ) | ||||
Line-of-credit borrowings
|
45,107,904 | 21,889,051 | ||||||
Line-of-credit (repayments)
|
(30,103,254 | ) | (42,991,654 | ) | ||||
Repayments of capital expenditure payables
|
(286,078 | ) | (352,430 | ) | ||||
Payments of financing costs
|
(70,784 | ) | (649 | ) | ||||
Net Cash Used In Financing Activities
|
(2,130,347 | ) | (7,277,846 | ) | ||||
Net Decrease In Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
293,506 | (351,741 | ) | |||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of period
|
593,281 | 688,675 | ||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of period
|
$ | 886,787 | $ | 336,934 |
6
Agree Realty Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||
September 30, 2011
|
September 30, 2010
|
|||||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
|
||||||||
Cash paid for interest (net of amounts capitalized)
|
$ | 3,447,396 | $ | 3,293,412 | ||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-Cash Transactions
|
||||||||
Dividends and limited partners’ distributions declared and unpaid
|
$ | 4,068,677 | $ | 5,143,682 | ||||
Real estate investments financed with accounts payable
|
$ | 54,321 | $ | 975,803 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
7
Agree Realty Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
|
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Agree Realty Corporation (the “Company”) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for audited financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2010 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date. Operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011 or for any other interim period. For further information, refer to the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
The Company has evaluated subsequent events since September 30, 2011 for events requiring recording or disclosure in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
|
|
2. Stock-Based Compensation
|
The Company estimates the fair value of restricted stock and stock option grants at the date of grant and amortizes those amounts into expense on a straight line basis or amount vested, if greater, over the appropriate vesting period.
|
|
As of September 30, 2011, there was $3,856,000 unrecognized compensation costs related to the outstanding restricted shares, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.49 years. The Company used a 0% discount factor and forfeiture rate for determining the fair value of restricted stock. The forfeiture rate was based on historical results and trends.
The holder of a restricted share award is generally entitled at all times on and after the date of issuance of the restricted shares to exercise the rights of a stockholder of the Company, including the right to vote the shares and the right to receive dividends on the shares.
|
Shares
Outstanding
|
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
|
|||||||
Unvested restricted shares at January 1, 2011
|
166,850 | $ | 22.00 | |||||
Restricted shares granted
|
105,050 | 22.01 | ||||||
Restricted shares vested
|
(37,410 | ) | 20.78 | |||||
Restricted shares forfeited
|
(12,150 | ) | 22.22 | |||||
Unvested restricted shares at September 30, 2011
|
222,340 | $ | 22.04 |
8
Agree Realty Corporation
3. Earnings Per Share
|
Earnings per share has been computed by dividing the net income attributable to Agree Realty Corporation by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.
The following is a reconciliation of the denominator of the basic net earnings per common share computation to the denominator of the diluted net earnings per common share computation for each of the periods presented:
|
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
9,858,175 | 9,756,248 | ||||||
Unvested restricted stock
|
(222,340 | ) | (175,320 | ) | ||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in basic earnings per share
|
9,635,835 | 9,580,928 | ||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in basic earnings per share
|
9,635,835 | 9,580,928 | ||||||
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
||||||||
Restricted stock
|
30,956 | 37,312 | ||||||
Common stock options
|
— | — | ||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in diluted earnings per share
|
9,666,791 | 9,618,240 |
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
||||||||
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
9,855,084 | 9,175,969 | ||||||
Unvested restricted stock
|
(222,340 | ) | (175,320 | ) | ||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in basic earnings per share
|
9,632,744 | 9,000,649 | ||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in basic earnings per share
|
9,632,744 | 9,000,649 | ||||||
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
||||||||
Restricted stock
|
36,606 | 33,980 | ||||||
Common stock options
|
— | — | ||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in diluted earnings per share
|
9,669,349 | 9,034,629 |
4. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
|
As of September 30, 2011, the impact of recent accounting pronouncements is not considered to be material.
|
5. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activity
|
On January 2, 2009, the Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement for a notional amount of $24,501,280, effective on January 2, 2009 and ending on July 1, 2013. The notional amount decreases over the term to match the outstanding balance of the hedged borrowing. The Company entered into this derivative instrument to hedge against the risk of changes in future cash flows related to changes in interest rates on $24,501,280 of the total variable-rate borrowings outstanding. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement, the Company will receive from the counterparty interest on the notional amount based on 1.5% plus one-month LIBOR and will pay to the counterparty a fixed rate of 3.744%. This swap effectively converted $24,501,280 of variable-rate borrowings to fixed-rate borrowings beginning on January 2, 2009 and through July 1, 2013.
Companies are required to recognize all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value on the balance sheet. The Company has designated this derivative instrument as a cash flow hedge. As such, changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument are recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) (“OCI”) for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 to the extent of effectiveness. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative instrument is recognized in interest expense. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company has determined this derivative instrument to be an effective hedge.
|
9
Agree Realty Corporation
The Company does not use derivative instruments for trading or other speculative purposes and did not have any other derivative instruments or hedging activities as of September 30, 2011.
|
6. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
|
Certain of the Company’s assets and liabilities are disclosed at fair value. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In determining fair value, the Company uses various valuation methods including the market, income and cost approaches. The assumptions used in the application of these valuation methods are developed from the perspective of market participants pricing the asset or liability. Inputs used in the valuation methods can be either readily observable, market corroborated, or generally unobservable inputs. Whenever possible the Company attempts to utilize valuation methods that maximize the uses of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs. Based on the operability of the inputs used in the valuation methods, the Company is required to provide the following information according to the fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. Assets and liabilities measured, reported and/or disclosed at fair value will be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
Level 1 – Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 – Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.
The table below sets forth the Company’s fair value hierarchy for liabilities measured or disclosed at fair value as of September 30, 2011.
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Carrying
Value
|
|||||||||||||
Liability:
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap
|
$ | — | $ | 759,200 | $ | — | $ | 759,200 | ||||||||
Fixed rate mortgage
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | 44,724,000 | $ | 42,423,005 | ||||||||
Variable rate mortgage
|
$ | — | $ | — | $ | 22,733,000 | $ | 23,283,728 | ||||||||
Variable rate debt
|
$ | — | $ | 43,384,904 | $ | — | $ | 43,384,904 |
The carrying amounts of the Company’s short-term financial instruments, which consist of cash, cash equivalents, receivables, and accounts payable, approximate their fair values. The fair value of the interest rate swap was derived using estimates to settle the interest rate swap agreement, which is based on the net present value of expected future cash flows on each leg of the swap utilizing market-based inputs and discount rates reflecting the risks involved. The fair value of fixed and variable rate mortgages was derived using the present value of future mortgage payments based on estimated current market interest rates. The fair value of variable rate debt is estimated to be equal to the face value of the debt because the interest rates are floating and is considered to approximate fair value.
|
10
Agree Realty Corporation
7. Total Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
The following is a reconciliation of net income to comprehensive income attributable to Agree Realty Corporation for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.
|
Three months ended
September 30, 2011
|
Three months ended
September 30, 2010
|
|||||||
Net income (loss)
|
$ | (1,855,344 | ) | $ | 4,540,568 | |||
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
21,671 | (256,062 | ) | |||||
Total comprehensive income before non-controlling interest
|
(1,833,673 | ) | 4,284,506 | |||||
Less: non-controlling interest
|
(61,823 | ) | 148,960 | |||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) after non-controlling interest
|
(1,771,850 | ) | 4,135,546 | |||||
Non-controlling interest of comprehensive income (loss)
|
(739 | ) | (8,809 | ) | ||||
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Agree Realty Corporation
|
$ | (1,772,589 | ) | $ | 4,144,355 |
Nine months ended
September 30, 2011
|
Nine months ended
September 30, 2010
|
|||||||
Net income
|
$ | 6,668,049 | $ | 18,940,508 | ||||
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
34,011 | (942,162 | ) | |||||
Total comprehensive income before non-controlling interest
|
6,702,060 | 17,998,346 | ||||||
Less: non-controlling interest
|
228,630 | 691,413 | ||||||
Total comprehensive income after non-controlling interest
|
6,473,430 | 17,306,933 | ||||||
Non-controlling interest of comprehensive income (loss)
|
1,160 | (33,546 | ) | |||||
Comprehensive income attributable to Agree Realty Corporation
|
$ | 6,472,270 | $ | 17,340,479 |
8. Impairment – Real Estate
|
Management periodically assesses its real estate for possible impairment whenever certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset, including accrued rental income, may not be recoverable through operations and eventual disposition. Events or circumstances that may occur include significant changes in real estate market conditions and the ability of the Company to re-lease or sell properties that are vacant or become vacant. Impairments are measured as the amount by which the current book value of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset. As a result of the Company’s review of Real Estate Investments, including identifiable intangible assets, the Company recognized the following real estate impairments for the nine months ended September 30:
|
2011
|
||||
Continuing operations
|
$ | 13,500,000 | ||
Discontinued operations
|
- | |||
Total
|
$ | 13,500,000 |
Real Estate Investments measured as fair value due to impairment charges are considered fair value measurements on a non recurring basis. The following table presents the assets and liabilities carried on the balance sheet within the fair value hierarchy (as described above) as of September 30, 2011, for which a nonrecurring change in fair value has been recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
|
2011 (in thousands):
|
Fair Value as of
measurement
date
|
Quoted prices
in active
markets for
identical assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
|
Impairment
Charge
|
|||||||||||||||
Real Estate Investments
|
$ | 19,805 | $ | 0 | $ | 7,100 | $ | 12,705 | $ | 13,500 |
The loss of $13.5 million represents an impairment charge related to Real Estate Investments which was included in net income during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The fair value of certain Real Estate Investments was calculated differently based on available information. Real Estate Investments considered to be measured based on Level 1 inputs were based on actual sales negotiations and bona fide purchase offers received from third parties. Real Estate Investments considered to be measured based on Level 2 inputs were based on broker opinions of value or analysis of recent comparable sales transactions. Real Estate Investments considered to be measured based on Level 3 inputs were based on an internal valuation model using discounted cash flow analyses and income capitalization using market lease rates and market cap rates. These cash flow projections incorporate assumptions developed from the perspective of market participants valuing the Real Estate Investments. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recorded no impairment charge related to Real Estate Investments.
|
11
Agree Realty Corporation
9. Costs and Estimated Earnings on Uncompleted Contracts
|
For contracts where the Company receives fee income for managing a development project and does not retain ownership of the real property developed, the Company uses the percentage of completion accounting method. Under this approach, income is recognized based on the status of the uncompleted contracts and the current estimates of costs to complete the project. The percentage of completion is determined by the relationship of costs incurred to the total estimated costs of the contract. Provisions are made for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts in the period in which such losses are determined. Changes in job performance, job conditions, and estimated profitability, including those arising from contract penalty provisions and final contract settlements, may result in revisions to costs and income. Such revisions are recognized in the period in which they are determined. Claims for additional compensation due to the Company are recognized in contract revenues when realization is probable and the amount can be reliably estimated.
|
As of September 30,
|
||||
2011
|
||||
Cost incurred on uncompleted Contracts
|
$ | 1,381,000 | ||
Estimated earnings
|
895,000 | |||
Earned revenue
|
2,276,000 | |||
Less billings to date
|
- | |||
Total
|
$ | 2,276,000 |
Total unbilled receivable at September 30, 2011 was $2,276,000, and is included in accounts receivable – tenants on the consolidated balance sheet.
|
10. Notes Payable
|
As of September 30, 2011, Agree Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”) had in place a $55 million Credit Facility with Bank of America, as the agent, which was guaranteed by the Company (the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility had been extended in January 2009 and was due to mature in November 2011. Advances under the Credit Facility bore interest within a range of one-month to 12-month LIBOR plus 100 basis points to 150 basis points or the lender’s prime rate, at the Company’s option, based on certain factors such as the ratio of the Company’s indebtedness to the capital value of the Company’s properties. The Credit Facility generally was used to fund property acquisitions and development activities. As of September 30, 2011, $42,239,943 was outstanding under the Credit Facility bearing a weighted average interest rate of 1.31%. The Credit Facility was paid off in October 2011 with proceeds from the New Credit Facility (defined below).
As of September 30, 2011, the Company also had in place a $5 million Line of Credit (“the Line of Credit”) that had been extended in October 2009 and was due to mature in November 2011. The Line of Credit bore interest at the lender’s prime rate less 75 basis points or 150 basis points in excess of the one-month to 12-month LIBOR rate, at the Company’s option. The purpose of the Line of Credit was generally to provide working capital and fund land options and start-up costs associated with new projects. As of September 30, 2011, $1,144,961 was outstanding under the Line of Credit bearing a weighted average interest rate of 2.50%. The Line of Credit was paid off in October 2011 with proceeds from the New Credit Facility (defined below).
|
12
Agree Realty Corporation
In October 2011, the Company closed on a new $85,000,000 unsecured revolving credit facility (the “New Credit Facility”). The New Credit Facility can be increased by up to $50,000,000 at the Company’s request, dependent upon there being one or more lenders willing to acquire the additional commitment, for a total potential credit facility commitment of $135,000,000. The New Credit Facility matures in October 2014, and can be extended for two one-year terms to October 2016 subject to certain conditions. The New Credit Facility bears interest at LIBOR plus a spread of 175 to 260 basis points or the base rate plus a spread of 75 to 160 basis points depending on the Company’s leverage. As of October 26, 2011, the Company borrowed $54 million on the New Credit Facility and the interest rate was anticipated to be 185 basis points over LIBOR. The net proceeds from the New Facility were used to repay the Credit Facility and Line of Credit.
The New Credit Facility contains customary covenants, including financial covenants regarding debt levels, total liabilities, tangible net worth, fixed charge coverage, unencumbered borrowing base properties, permitted investments etc. The Company was in compliance with the covenant terms at closing.
|
||
11. Mortgages Payable
|
Mortgages payable consisted of the following:
|
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2011
|
2010
|
|||||||
Note payable in monthly installments of $44,550 plus interest at 150 basis points over LIBOR (1.73% and 1.76% at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively). A final balloon payment in the amount of $22,318,478 is due on July 14, 2013 unless extended for a two year period at the option of the Company
|
$ | 23,283,728 | $ | 23,666,828 | ||||
Note payable in monthly installments of $153,838 including interest at 6.90% per annum, with the final monthly payment due January 2020; collateralized by related real estate and tenants’ leases
|
11,674,735 | 12,433,134 | ||||||
Note payable in monthly installments of $91,675 including interest at 6.27% per annum, with the final monthly payment due July 2026; collateralized by related real estate and tenants’ leases
|
10,606,347 | 10,924,291 | ||||||
Note payable in monthly installments of $128,205 including interest at 11.20% per annum, with a final monthly payment due November 2018; collateralized by related real estate and tenants’ leases
|
9,173,789 | 9,605,696 | ||||||
Note payable in monthly installments of $99,598 including interest at 6.63% per annum, with the final monthly payment due February 2017; collateralized by related real estate and tenants’ leases
|
5,426,472 | 6,036,060 | ||||||
Note payable in monthly installments of $57,403 including interest at 8.50% per annum, with the final monthly payment due February 2023; collateralized by related real estate and tenant lease
|
5,541,662 | 5,781,587 | ||||||
Note payable in monthly installments of $25,631 including interest at 7.50% per annum, with the final monthly payment due May 2022; collateralized by related real estate and tenant lease. Loan released August 2011
|
- | 2,354,450 | ||||||
Note payable in monthly installments of $12,453 including interest at 6.85% per annum. Paid March 31, 2011
|
- | 724,734 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 65,706,733 | $ | 71,526,780 |
13
Agree Realty Corporation
The Company paid off a note payable in the amount of $704,374 on March 31, 2011.
The Company entered into a release agreement in August 2011 for the mortgage loan which was previously secured by a mortgage on the leasehold interest in the former Borders store in Lawrence, Kansas amounting to approximately $2.3 million. While the lender had a leasehold mortgage on the property, the Company owned the fee interest in the property. The underlying ground lease was in default subsequent to Borders rejecting the lease and the lender did not cure the underlying default under the ground lease. The release agreement provided for the extinguishment of all liabilities due to the lender under the loan. The gain on extinguishment of $2.4 million has been reflected during the third quarter of 2011.
The Company has five mortgaged properties that were leased to Borders that serve as collateral for five non-recourse loans, including four mortgages that are cross-defaulted and cross-collateralized (the “Crossed Loans”). As of the date of this filing, and directly or indirectly because of the Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing of Borders in February 2011, the Company is in default on the five mortgage loans.
The first defaulted loan had a principal amount outstanding of approximately $5.6 million as of September 30, 2011, and is secured by the Borders corporate headquarters in Ann Arbor, Michigan, with 330,322 square feet of GLA. The property represented approximately $769,000 of annualized base rent as of September 30, 2011. To date, Borders has continued to pay its monthly rent for the property. However, because the Borders bankruptcy constituted an event of default under the applicable loan agreement, the lender notified the Company that it is in default and that our obligations under the loan have been accelerated and that default interest is owing. As a result of the Borders liquidation program, the Company would not expect to have sufficient cash flow from the property to continue to pay any of the debt service on the loan and may elect not to pay the debt service.
The four defaulted Crossed Loans had an aggregate principal amount outstanding of approximately $9.2 million as of September 30, 2011, and are secured by the Borders stores in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Columbia, Maryland, Germantown, Maryland, and one of the Borders stores in Omaha, Nebraska. In April 2011, Borders vacated the Oklahoma City, Oklahoma store of 24,641 square feet and rejected the lease and stopped making rental payments. In September 2011, Borders vacated the Omaha, Nebraska store of 24,641 square feet and the Germantown, Maryland store of 25,503 square feet and rejected the leases and stopped making rental payments. In September 2011, Borders assigned the lease for the Columbia, Maryland store of 28,000 square feet to Books-A-Million, Inc. While the Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing of Borders is not a direct event of default under the four Crossed Loans, as a result of the Oklahoma City, Oklahoma closure and lease rejection, the Company did not pay $36,410 in monthly debt service for the loan associated with that location, which was due for the months of May through September 2011. In addition, while Borders continued to occupy and pay the monthly rent for the other three locations, due to rental reductions negotiated during the bankruptcy process and approved by the lender, the Company did not have sufficient cash flow to pay $91,198 in monthly debt service due July 1, 2011 for the additional three properties and $91,795 due August 1 and September 1, 2011. The lender has declared all four Crossed Loans in default and accelerated the Company’s obligations thereunder. As a result of the Borders liquidation program, the Company would not expect to have sufficient cash flow from the properties to continue to pay any of the debt service on the loan and may elect not to pay the debt service.
The Company is in active discussions with the lenders for all five non-recourse loans regarding an appropriate course of action. The Company can provide no assurance that its negotiations with the lenders will result in favorable outcomes to it. Failure to restructure these mortgage obligations could result in foreclosure actions and the loss of the mortgaged properties. As of September 30, 2011, the net book value plus accumulated depreciation of the five mortgaged properties was approximately $18.4 million, after impairments of $3.2 million taken in the third quarter of 2011, and the aggregate balances on the non-recourse loans amounted to approximately $14.7 million. Annualized base rents as of September 30, 2011, for the five mortgaged properties, of which only one is currently occupied by Borders and paying rent and one which is occupied by Books-A-Million, was approximately $1.2 million, or 3.7% of the Company’s annualized base rent as of September 30, 2011.
|
14
Agree Realty Corporation
Future scheduled annual maturities of mortgages payable for years ending September 30, excluding the effect of mortgage defaults, are as follows: 2012 - $4,567,986; 2013 - $26,733,417; 2014 - $4,258,449; 2015 - $4,545,350; 2016 - $4,851,618 and $20,749,913 thereafter. The weighted average interest rate at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was 6.40% and 5.63%, respectively.
|
||
12. Deferred Revenue
|
In July 2004, the Company’s tenant in two joint venture properties located in Ann Arbor, MI and Boynton Beach, FL repaid $13.8 million that had been contributed by the Company’s joint venture partner. As a result of this repayment the Company became the sole member of the limited liability companies holding the properties. Total assets of the two properties were approximately $13.8 million. The Company has treated the $13.8 million repayment of the capital contribution as deferred revenue and accordingly, will recognize rental income over the term of the related leases.
In September 2011, the Company’s tenant in Ann Arbor, Michigan terminated their lease. The Company recognized rental income of $5.7 million during the third quarter of 2011 related to this property which is included in minimum rents in the accompanying financial statements.
The remaining deferred revenue of approximately $2.5 million will be recognized as minimum rents over approximately 5.25 years.
|
|
13. Discontinued Operations
|
During 2010, the Company sold two single tenant properties and entered into a lease termination agreement for one property. The properties were located in Santa Barbara, California, Marion Oaks, Florida and Aventura, Florida. Two of the properties were leased to Borders and one property was leased to Walgreens. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Santa Barbara sale provided gross proceeds of approximately $9.8 million and a gain on sale of approximately $5.3 million. In addition, in January 2011, the Company completed the sale of two Borders stores located in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The net proceeds on the transaction amounted to approximately $6.5 million and there was no gain or loss on the sale as a $440,000 impairment charge was recorded in 2010 when the property was classified as held for sale. The results of operations for these properties are presented as discontinued operations in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income. The revenues for the properties were $549,454 and $1,816,651 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and $-0- and $91,816 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. The expenses for the properties were $184,053 and $613,287 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and $-0- and $-0- for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively.
|
|
14. Purchase Accounting for Acquisitions of Real Estate
|
Acquired real estate assets have been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and accordingly, the results of operations are included in the consolidated statements of income from the respective dates of acquisition. The Company allocates the purchase price to (i) land and buildings based on management’s internally prepared estimates and (ii) identifiable intangible assets or liabilities generally consisting of above-market and below-market in-place leases and in-place leases. The Company uses estimates of fair value based on estimated cash flows, using appropriate discount rates, and other valuation techniques, including management’s analysis of comparable properties in the existing portfolio, to allocate the purchase price to acquired tangible and intangible assets.
The estimated fair value of above-market and below-market in-place leases for acquired properties is recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease.
|
15
Agree Realty Corporation
The aggregate fair value of other intangible assets consisting of in-place, at market leases, is estimated based on internally developed methods to determine the respective property values and are included in lease intangible costs in the consolidated balance sheets. Factors considered by management in their analysis include an estimate of costs to execute similar leases and operating costs saved.
During 2011, the Company purchased six retail assets for approximately $20.3 million to obtain 100% control of the assets. The aggregate acquisitions were allocated as follows: $7.3 million to land, $7.2 million to buildings and improvements and $5.8 million to lease intangible costs. The acquisitions were cash purchases and there were no contingent considerations associated with these acquisitions.
The fair value of intangible assets acquired is amortized to depreciation and amortization on the consolidated statements of income over the remaining term of the respective leases. The weighted average amortization period for the lease intangible costs is 21.5 years.
|
||
15. Subsequent Event
|
In October 2011, the Company closed on its $85,000,000 New Credit Facility. The New Credit Facility can be increased by up to $50,000,000 at the Company’s request, dependent upon there being one or more lenders willing to acquire the additional commitment, for a total potential credit facility commitment of $135,000,000. The New Credit Facility matures in October 2014, and can be extended for two one-year terms to October 2016, subject to certain conditions. The New Credit Facility bears interest at LIBOR plus a spread of 175 to 260 basis points or the base rate plus a spread of 75 to 160 basis points depending on the Company’s leverage. As of October 26, 2011, the Company borrowed $54 million on the New Credit Facility and the interest rate is anticipated to be 185 basis points over LIBOR. The net proceeds from the New Credit Facility were used to repay the Credit Facility and Line of Credit.
The New Credit Facility contains customary covenants, including financial covenants regarding debt levels, total liabilities, tangible net worth, fixed charge coverage, unencumbered borrowing base properties, permitted investments etc. The Company was in compliance with the covenant terms at closing.
|
16
Agree Realty Corporation
ITEM 2.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
Forward-Looking Statements
We have included herein certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements represent our expectations, plans and beliefs concerning future events and may be identified by terminology such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “should,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend” and similar expressions. Although the forward-looking statements made in this report are based on good faith beliefs and our reasonable judgment reflecting current information, certain factors could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward–looking statements, including but not limited to: the ongoing U.S. recession, the existing global credit and financial crisis and other changes in general economic, financial and real estate market conditions; risks that our acquisition and development projects will fail to perform as expected; financing risks, such as the inability to obtain debt or equity financing on favorable terms or at all; the level and volatility of interest rates; loss or bankruptcy of one or more of our major retail tenants; a failure of our properties to generate additional income to offset increases in operating expenses; and other factors discussed in Part II, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report and our other reports furnished or filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) including our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update these forward–looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future.
Overview
Agree Realty Corporation is a fully-integrated, self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust (“REIT”). In this report, the terms “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” and similar terms refer to Agree Realty Corporation and/or its majority owned operating partnership, Agree Limited Partnership (“Operating Partnership”) and/or its majority owned and controlled subsidiaries, including its qualified taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”), as the context may require. Our assets are held by and all of our operations are conducted through, directly or indirectly, the Operating Partnership, of which we are the sole general partner and in which we held a 96.59% and 96.56% interest as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Under the partnership agreement of the Operating Partnership, we, as the sole general partner, have exclusive responsibility and discretion in the management and control of the Operating Partnership. We are operating so as to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.
We are focused primarily on the ownership, development, acquisition and management of retail properties net leased to national tenants. We were incorporated in December 1993 to continue and expand the business founded in 1971 by our current Chief Executive Officer and Chairman, Richard Agree. We specialize in developing retail properties for national tenants who have executed long-term net leases prior to the commencement of construction. As of September 30, 2011, approximately 87% of our annualized base rent was derived from national tenants and approximately 52% of our annualized base rent was derived from our top three tenants: Walgreen Co. (“Walgreens”) – 34%; Kmart Corporation – 12% and CVS/Caremark – 6%.
As of September 30, 2011, our portfolio consisted of 85 properties, located in 20 states containing an aggregate of approximately 3.8 million square feet of gross leasable area (“GLA”). As of September 30, 2011, our portfolio included 73 freestanding net leased properties and 12 community shopping centers that were 91.1% leased in aggregate with a weighted average lease term of approximately 12 years remaining. Borders currently leases 8.6% of the Company’s GLA. All of our freestanding property tenants and the majority of our community shopping center tenants have triple-net leases, which require the tenant to be responsible for property operating expenses, including property taxes, insurance and maintenance. We believe this strategy provides a generally consistent source of income and cash for distributions. During the period from October 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 we have two leases that are scheduled to expire assuming that neither of the tenants exercise renewal options. These two leases represent 4,700 square feet of GLA and $35,975 of annualized base rent.
We expect to continue to grow our asset base through the development and acquisition of retail properties that are leased on a long-term basis to national tenants. Historically we have focused on development because we believe, based on the historical returns we have been able to achieve, it generally has provided us a higher return on investment than the acquisition of similarly located properties. However, during 2010, we commenced an aggressive acquisition program to acquire retail properties net leased to national tenants. Since our initial public offering in 1994, we have developed 60 of our 85 properties, including 48 of our 73 freestanding properties and all 12 of our community shopping centers. As of September 30, 2011, the properties that we developed accounted for 79% of our annualized base rent. We expect to continue to expand our existing tenant relationships and diversify our tenant base to include other quality national tenants through the development and acquisition of net leased properties.
17
Agree Realty Corporation
The following should be read in conjunction with the Interim Consolidated Financial Statements of Agree Realty Corporation, including the respective notes thereto, which are included in this Form 10-Q.
Borders
As of December 31, 2010, we had 14 properties leased to Borders, Inc. under triple net leases, including 13 retail properties and the Borders Group, Inc. corporate headquarters in Ann Arbor, Michigan. As of December 31, 2010, we had annualized base rent of approximately $7.4 million from Borders, Inc., amounting to approximately 20% of our total annualized base rent. In addition, as of December 31, 2010, we owned two additional Borders locations that were occupied by subtenants under sublease agreements with Borders.
In January 2011, we completed the sale of two of our Borders superstores located in Tulsa, Oklahoma. The properties were sold to an unrelated party for approximately $6.5 million. The proceeds from the sale were used to pay down amounts outstanding under our credit facilities.
On February 16, 2011, Borders filed a petition for reorganization relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Chapter 11 petition for relief was filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York. In connection with the Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing, Borders announced that it would undertake a strategic Store Reduction Program and identified certain underperforming stores, equivalent to approximately 30% of its national store network, that would be closed. In connection with the Store Reduction Program, in April 2011, Borders closed stores and rejected leases at five locations where it leased space from us, representing approximately $2.6 million of our annualized base rent as of March 31, 2011. The locations of the five stores on the Borders store closing list were: Columbus, Ohio; Monroeville, Pennsylvania; Wichita, Kansas; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma and Lawrence, Kansas. In July 2011, we leased the former Borders location in Wichita, Kansas to Vitamin Cottage Natural Food Markets, Inc. The new tenant plans to open a Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage store in the location. We have been marketing the other four closed stores for potential re-tenanting or disposition.
As discussed above, two of our Borders locations were occupied by subtenants under sublease agreements with Borders. In connection with the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings, effective July 1, 2011, our affiliates took control of the two properties and assignment of those subleases. We expect these locations will generate approximately $557,000 in annual base rental revenues, plus approximately $500,000 of non-cash rentals. We waived certain bankruptcy rejection damage claims against Borders for its unencumbered stores to facilitate this transaction, and Borders is no longer obligated under the two leases. The two properties are located in Boynton Beach, Florida (subleased to Off Broadway Shoes) and Indianapolis, Indiana (subleased to Simply Amish Furniture). We also have the ability to develop a 16,000 square foot building adjacent to the Boynton Beach property.
In June 2011, in conjunction with Borders Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings, we successfully negotiated rental reductions at various properties leased to Borders in an effort to keep these stores operating. We negotiated rental reductions of approximately 30% for three of the retail properties located in Norman, Oklahoma, Omaha, Nebraska and Ann Arbor, Michigan. As of June 30, 2011, the leases for these properties provided for annual rentals amounting to approximately $1.4 million, including approximately $700,000 of non-cash rentals, retroactive to March 1, 2011. In addition, with lender approval, we negotiated rental reductions of approximately 31% for three of our encumbered properties located in Columbia, Maryland, Germantown, Maryland and Omaha, Nebraska. As of June 30, 2011, the leases for these properties provided for annual rentals of approximately $1 million, retroactive to March 1, 2011. These three properties are encumbered by non-recourse loans, which are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted with a fourth property in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, which has been closed by Borders. See “—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
In July 2011, Borders, unable to sell itself as a going concern, sought and received the bankruptcy court's approval for the liquidation of all of the assets of Borders, including its leases, under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Borders liquidation was expected to commence for some stores and facilities as soon as July 22, 2011 under a phased program expected to conclude in September 2011.
18
Agree Realty Corporation
As of June 30, 2011, we had seven properties leased to Borders, Inc. under triple net leases, including six retail properties and the Borders Group, Inc. corporate headquarters in Ann Arbor, Michigan. As of June 30, 2011, we had annualized base rent of approximately $3.2 million from Borders, Inc., amounting to approximately 9% of our total annualized base rent (excluding the two subleases that were assigned to us effective July 1, 2011).
In September 2011, six of the properties formerly leased to Borders were closed and the leases rejected, representing $2.4 million of annualized base rent at June 30, 2011. The locations of the six stores were Ann Arbor, Michigan, Columbia and Germantown, Maryland, Norman, Oklahoma, and two locations in Omaha, Nebraska. The property in Columbia, Maryland was assigned to Books-A-Million. As of September 30, 2011, we had one property leased to Borders, Inc. under a triple net lease, comprised of the Borders Group, Inc. corporate headquarters in Ann Arbor, Michigan. As of September 30, 2011, we had annualized base rent of approximately $.8 million from Borders, Inc., amounting to approximately 2.3% of our total annualized base rent.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2011, we recognized various non-cash items amounting to net charges of $(5,440,000) related to the Borders properties. These included non-cash impairment charges of $13,500,000, offset by non-cash deferred revenue recognition of $5,700,000 which is included in minimum rents and a non-cash gain on extinguishment of debt of $2,360,000.
We have two former Borders properties under contract to sell for an aggregate sales price of $4.6 million. Closing of these transactions is subject to the satisfactory completion of the purchasers’ due diligence investigations and other customary closing conditions, and there is no assurance that the conditions will be satisfied or that the sales will occur as contemplated.
The Borders liquidation has negatively affected our operating results and will continue to negatively affect our future operating results due to the anticipated closure of the Borders corporate headquarter location. Until Borders determines its plan the corporate headquarters location, there will be uncertainty in determining the ultimate impact on our operations. We have been actively marketing all of the Borders locations for potential re-tenanting or disposition.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
As of September 30, 2011, the impact of recent accounting pronouncements on our business is not considered to be material.
Critical Accounting Policies
Critical accounting policies are those that are both significant to the overall presentation of our financial condition and results of operations and require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments. For example, significant estimates and assumptions have been made with respect to revenue recognition, capitalization of costs related to real estate investments, potential impairment of real estate investments, operating cost reimbursements, and taxable income.
Minimum rental income attributable to leases is recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Certain leases provide for additional percentage rents based on tenants’ sales volumes. These percentage rents are recognized when determinable by us.
Real estate assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. All costs related to planning, development and construction of buildings prior to the date they become operational, including interest and real estate taxes during the construction period, are capitalized for financial reporting purposes and recorded as property under development until construction has been completed. The viability of all projects under construction or development is regularly evaluated under applicable accounting requirements, including requirements relating to abandonment of assets or changes in use. To the extent a project, or individual components of the project, are no longer considered to have value, the related capitalized costs are charged against operations. Subsequent to the completion of construction, expenditures for property maintenance are charged to operations as incurred, while significant renovations are capitalized. Depreciation of the buildings is recorded in accordance with the straight-line method using an estimated useful life of 40 years.
We evaluate real estate for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable through estimated undiscounted future cash flows from the use of these assets. When any such impairment exists, the related assets will be written down to fair value and such excess carrying value is charged to income. The expected cash flows of a project are dependent on estimates and other factors subject to change, including (1) changes in the national, regional, and/or local economic climates, (2) competition from other shopping centers, stores, clubs, mailings, and the internet, (3) increases in operating costs, (4) bankruptcy and/or other changes in the condition of third parties, including tenants, (5) expected holding period, and (6) availability of credit. These factors could cause our expected future cash flows from a project to change, and, as a result, an impairment could be considered to have occurred. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 we recorded impairment charges of $13.5 million related to the carrying value of our real estate assets.
Substantially all of our leases contain provisions requiring tenants to pay as additional rent a proportionate share of operating expenses (“operating cost reimbursements”) including real estate taxes, repairs and maintenance and insurance. The related revenue from tenant billings is recognized in the same period the expense is recorded.
19
Agree Realty Corporation
We have elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 1994. As a result, we are not subject to federal income taxes to the extent that we distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income to our stockholders and satisfy certain other requirements defined in the Code.
We have established TRS entities pursuant to the provisions of the REIT Modernization Act. Our TRS entities are able to engage in activities resulting in income that previously would have been disqualified from being eligible REIT income under the federal income tax regulations. As a result, certain of our activities which occur within our TRS entities are subject to federal and state income taxes. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had accrued a deferred income tax amount of $705,000. In addition, we have recognized income tax expense of $252,000 and $93,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and year ended December 31, 2010, respectively.
Comparison of Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 to Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
Minimum rental income increased $6,133,000, or 75%, to $14,270,000 in 2011, compared to $8,137,000 in 2010. Rental income increased $5,697,000 due to the recognition of deferred revenue, and $711,000 due to the acquisition of various properties, including the acquisition of a CVS drug store in Mansfield, Connecticut in November 2010, the acquisition of a PNC Bank branch in Antioch, Illinois and a Lowes Home Improvement store in Concord, North Carolina in November 2010, a Kohls in Tallahassee, Florida and Chase bank branch in Spring Grove, Illinois in December 2010, an AT&T store in Wilmington, North Carolina in January 2011, an Advance Auto store in Marietta, Georgia in June 2011, a NTB store in Dallas, Texas in July 2011, a CVS store in Roseville, California and an Aldi discount grocery store in August 2011, and Big O Tire store in Chandler, Arizona in September 2011. The increase also resulted from rental increases of $603,000 related to the development of Walgreens drug stores in Ann Arbor, Michigan in September 2010, Atlantic Beach, Florida in October 2010, and St. Augustine Shores, Florida in November 2010, along with the redevelopment of Dick’s Sporting Goods in Boynton Beach, Florida in October 2010. Rental revenue decreased $882,000 due to the closure of five Borders stores in April 2011, rental reductions at various Borders stores effective March 1, 2011 and the closure of six Borders stores in September 2011. In addition, rental income increased $4,000 as a result of other rent adjustments.
Percentage rents were $1,000 in 2011 compared to $8,000 in 2010.
Operating cost reimbursements increased $259,000, or 44%, to $849,000 in 2011, compared to $590,000 in 2010. Operating cost reimbursements increased due to the change in real estate taxes and property operating expenses explained below.
We earned development fee income of $47,000 in 2010 related to a project in Oakland, California. There was no development in during the third quarter of 2011. There are no additional development fee projects currently anticipated.
Other income was $28,000 in 2011 and 2010.
Real estate taxes increased $416,000, or 91%, to $871,000 in 2011, compared to $455,000 in 2010. The change was the result of the acquisition of additional properties of $49,000, $333,000 related to properties formerly leased to Borders which taxes were formerly paid directly by Borders and other increases of $34,000.
Property operating expenses (shopping center maintenance, snow removal, insurance and utilities) decreased $19,000, or 5%, to $378,000 in 2011, compared to $397,000 in 2010. The decrease was the result of a decrease in shopping center maintenance costs of $59,000, an increase in utility costs of $37,000 including utilities for vacant spaces, an increase in insurance costs of $5,000 offset by a decrease in other expenses of $2,000 in 2011 versus 2010.
Land lease payments increased $158,000, or 163%, to $255,000 in 2011, compared to $97,000 for 2010. The increase was the result of the completion of a Walgreens drugstore in Ann Arbor, Michigan, the acquisition of a Kohls in Tallahassee, Florida and the underlying ground lease related to a Borders property.
General and administrative expenses decreased by $58,000, or 5%, to $1,093,000 in 2011, compared to $1,151,000 in 2010. The decrease in general and administrative expenses was the result of increased employee costs of $55,000, decreased legal expense of $46,000, decreased income tax expenses in our TRS entities of $50,000 and a decrease in other costs of $17,000. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total rental income (minimum and percentage rents) decreased from 13.23% for 2010 to 12.73% for 2011 without the impact of the deferred revenue recognition.
20
Agree Realty Corporation
Depreciation and amortization increased $472,000, or 33%, to $1,909,000 in 2011, compared to $1,437,000 in 2010. The increase was the result of the development of three properties in 2010 and the acquisition of properties in 2010 and 2011 offset in part due to the discontinued operations.
We incurred an impairment charge of $13,500,000 in 2011 as a result of writing down the carrying value of our real estate assets for properties formerly leased to Borders. There was no impairment charge in 2010.
Interest expense increased $260,000, or 24%, to $1,358,000 in 2011, compared to $1,098,000 in 2010. The increase in interest expense is a result the higher level of borrowings due to the development and acquisition of properties and the impact of default interest on various mortgage loans.
We recognized a gain on extinguishment of debt of $2,360,000 related to the Lawrence mortgage that was released in 2011.
Income from discontinued operations was $-0- in 2011 compared to $365,000 in 2010, as a result of the sale of the Santa Barbara, California Borders store in March 2010, the sale of the Walgreens store in Marion Oaks, Florida in October 2010, the sale of the Aventura property in October 2010 and the sales of the two Borders stores in Tulsa, Oklahoma in January 2011.
Our net income (loss) increased ($6,396,000), to ($1,855,000) in 2011 from $4,541,000 in 2010 as a result of the foregoing factors.
Comparison of Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
Minimum rental income increased $7,641,000, or 32%, to $31,620,000 in 2011, compared to $23,979,000 in 2010. Rental income increased $5,697,000 due to the recognition of deferred revenue, $2,293,000 due to the acquisition of various properties, including the acquisition of CVS drug stores in Atchison, Kansas and Johnstown, Ohio in June 2010, Lake in the Hills, Illinois in August 2010 and Mansfield, Connecticut in November 2010, the acquisition of a PNC Bank branch in Antioch, Illinois and a Lowes Home Improvement store in Concord, North Carolina in November 2010, a Kohls in Tallahassee, Florida and Chase bank branch in Spring Grove, Illinois in December 2010, an AT&T store in Wilmington, North Carolina in January 2011, an Advance Auto store in Marietta, Georgia in June 2011, a NTB store in Dallas, Texas in July 2011, a CVS store in Roseville, California and an Aldi discount grocery store in New Lenox, Illinois in August 2011, and Big O Tire store in Chandler, Arizona in September 2011. The increase also resulted from rental increases of $1,557,000 related to the development of Walgreens drug stores in Ann Arbor, Michigan in September 2010, Atlantic Beach, Florida in October 2010, and St. Augustine Shores, Florida in November 2010, along with the redevelopment of Dick’s Sporting Goods in Boynton Beach, Florida in October 2010. Rental revenue decreased $1,836,000 due to the closure of five Borders stores in April 2011, rental reductions at various Borders stores effective March 1, 2011 and the closure of six Borders stores in September 2011. In addition, rental income decreased $70,000 as a result of other rent adjustments.
Percentage rents increased from $21,000 in 2010 to $22,000 in 2011.
Operating cost reimbursements increased $450,000, or 24%, to $2,350,000 in 2011, compared to $1,900,000 in 2010. Operating cost reimbursements increased due to the change in real estate taxes and property operating expenses explained below.
We earned development fee income of $895,000 in 2011 related to a project in Berkeley, California. There was $583,000 of development fee income in 2010. There are no additional development fee projects currently anticipated.
Other income increased to $112,000 in 2011, compared to $63,000 in 2010.
Real estate taxes increased $824,000, or 57%, to $2,276,000 in 2011, compared to $1,452,000 in 2010. The change was the result of the acquisition of additional properties of $169,000, $620,000 related to properties formerly leased to Borders which taxes were formerly paid directly by Borders, and other increases of $35,000.
Property operating expenses (shopping center maintenance, snow removal, insurance and utilities) increased $64,000, or 6%, to $1,187,000 in 2011, compared to $1,123,000 in 2010. The increase was primarily the result of an increase in snow removal costs of $38,000; a decrease in shopping center maintenance costs of $64,000; an increase in utility costs of $74,000 including utilities for vacant spaces; and an increase in insurance costs of $16,000 in 2011 versus 2010.
21
Agree Realty Corporation
Land lease payments increased $447,000, or 154%, to $737,000 in 2011, compared to $290,000 for 2010. The increase was the result of the completion of a Walgreens drugstore in Ann Arbor, Michigan, the acquisition of a Kohls in Tallahassee, Florida and the underlying ground lease related to a Borders property.
General and administrative expenses increased by $452,000, or 13%, to $4,056,000 in 2011, compared to $3,604,000 in 2010. The increase in general and administrative expenses was the result of increased employee costs of $279,000, income tax expenses in our TRS entities of $122,000, and increased legal costs of $80,000, offset by decreases of $29,000 of other expenses. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total rental income (minimum and percentage rents) increased from 13.96% for 2010 to 15.57% for 2011 without the impact of the deferred revenue recognition.
Depreciation and amortization increased $982,000, or 24%, to $5,158,000 in 2011, compared to $4,176,000 in 2010. The increase was the result of the development of three properties in 2010, the redevelopment of one property in 2010 and the acquisition of nine properties in 2010 and six properties in 2011 offset in part due to the discontinued operations.
We incurred an impairment charge of $13,500,000 in 2011 as a result of writing down the carrying value of our real estate assets for properties formerly leased to Borders. There was no impairment charge in 2010.
Interest expense increased $377,000, or 11%, to $3,869,000 in 2011, compared to $3,492,000 in 2010. The increase in interest expense is a result of the higher levels of borrowings for the acquisition and development of properties and the impact of default interest on various mortgage loans.
We recognized a gain on extinguishment of debt of $2,360,000 related to the Lawrence mortgage that was released in 2011.
We recognized a gain of $5,328,000 on the sale of our Borders Books store located in Santa Barbara, California in 2010. There was no gain on sales in 2011.
Income from discontinued operations decreased to $92,000 in 2011, from $1,203,000 in 2010, as a result of the sale of the Santa Barbara, California Borders store in March 2010, the sale of the Walgreens store in Marion Oaks, Florida in October 2010, the sale of the Aventura property in October 2010 and the sales of the two Borders stores in Tulsa, Oklahoma in January 2011.
Our net income decreased $12,273,000, or 65%, to $6,668,000 in 2011 from $18,941,000 in 2010 as a result of the foregoing factors.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal demands for liquidity are operations, distributions to our stockholders, debt repayment, development of new properties, redevelopment of existing properties and property acquisitions. We intend to meet our short-term liquidity requirements, including capital expenditures related to the leasing and improvement of our properties, through cash flow provided by operations, and our credit facility. We believe that adequate cash flow will be available to fund our operations and pay dividends in accordance with REIT requirements for at least the next 12 months. We may obtain additional funds for future developments or acquisitions through other borrowings or the issuance of additional shares of common stock. We believe that these financing sources will enable us to generate funds sufficient to meet both our short-term and long-term capital needs.
We intend to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness (including construction or acquisition financing) to total market capitalization of 65% or less. Nevertheless, we may operate with debt levels which are in excess of 65% of total market capitalization for extended periods of time. At September 30, 2011, our ratio of indebtedness to total market capitalization was approximately 33%.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2011, we declared a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. We paid the dividend on October 11, 2011 to holders of record on September 30, 2011.
Our cash flows from operations decreased $1,727,000 to $16,577,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to $18,304,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Cash used by investing activities increased $2,775,000 to $14,153,000 in 2011, compared to $11,378,000 in 2010. Cash used in financing activities decreased $5,148,000 to $2,130,000 in 2011, compared to $7,278,000 in 2010.
22
Agree Realty Corporation
As of September 30, 2011, we had total mortgage indebtedness of $65,706,733. Of this total mortgage indebtedness, $42,423,005 is fixed rate, self-amortizing debt with a weighted average interest rate of 7.85%. The remaining mortgage debt of $23,283,728 bears interest at 150 basis points over LIBOR or 1.74% as of September 30, 2011 and has a maturity date of July 14, 2013, which can be extended at our option for two additional years. In January 2009, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement that fixes the interest rate during the initial term of the variable-interest mortgage at 3.744%.
As discussed above under “Overview—Borders,” in July 2011, Borders, unable to sell itself as a going concern, sought and received the bankruptcy court's approval for the liquidation of all of the assets of Borders, including its leases, under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. As of September 30, 2011, we had one property leased to Borders, Inc. under a triple net lease, comprised of the Borders Group, Inc. corporate headquarters in Ann Arbor, Michigan. As of September 30, 2011, we had annualized base rent of approximately $.8 million from Borders, Inc., amounting to approximately 2.3% of our total annualized base rent. Borders closed six of its stores that were leased from us in September 2011 and rejected the leases. We have five mortgaged properties that were leased to Borders that serve as collateral for five non-recourse loans, including four mortgages that are cross-defaulted and cross-collateralized (the “Crossed Loans”). As of the date of this filing, and directly or indirectly because of the Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing of Borders in February 2011, we are in default on the five mortgage loans.
The first defaulted loan had a principal amount outstanding of approximately $5.6 million as of September 30, 2011, and is secured by the Borders corporate headquarters in Ann Arbor, Michigan, with 330,322 square feet of GLA. The property represented approximately $769,000 of annualized base rent as of September 30, 2011. To date, Borders has continued to pay its monthly rent for the property. However, because the Borders bankruptcy constituted an event of default under the applicable loan agreement, the lender notified the Company that it is in default and that our obligations under the loan have been accelerated and that default interest is owing. As a result of the Borders liquidation program, the Company would not expect to have sufficient cash flow from the property to continue to pay any of the debt service on the loan and may elect not to pay the debt service.
The four defaulted Crossed Loans had an aggregate principal amount outstanding of approximately $9.2 million as of September 30, 2011, and are secured by the Borders stores in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, Columbia, Maryland and Germantown, Maryland, and one of the Borders stores in Omaha, Nebraska. In April 2011, Borders vacated the Oklahoma City, Oklahoma store of 24,641 square feet and rejected the lease and stopped making rental payments. In September 2011, Borders vacated the Omaha, Nebraska store of 24,641 square feet and the Germantown, Maryland store of 25,503 square feet and rejected the leases and stopped making rental payments. In September 2011, Borders assigned the lease for the Columbia, Maryland store of 28,000 square feet to Books-A-Million, Inc. While the Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing of Borders is not a direct event of default under the four Crossed Loans, as a result of the Oklahoma City, Oklahoma closure and lease rejection, the Company did not pay $36,410 in monthly debt service for the loan associated with that location, which was due for the months of May through September 2011. In addition, while Borders continued to occupy and pay the monthly rent for the other three locations, due to rental reductions negotiated during the bankruptcy process and approved by the lender, the Company did not have sufficient cash flow to pay $91,198 in monthly debt service due July 1, 2011 for the additional three properties and $91,795 due August 1 and September 1, 2011. The lender has declared all four Crossed Loans in default and accelerated the Company’s obligations thereunder. As a result of the Borders liquidation program, the Company would not expect to have sufficient cash flow from the properties to continue to pay any of the debt service on the loan and may elect not to pay the debt service.
The Company is in active discussions with the lenders for all five non-recourse loans regarding an appropriate course of action. The Company can provide no assurance that its negotiations with the lenders will result in favorable outcomes to it. Failure to restructure these mortgage obligations could result in foreclosure actions and the loss of the mortgaged properties. As of September 30, 2011, the net book value plus accumulated depreciation of the five mortgaged properties was approximately $18.4 million, after impairments of $3.2 million taken in the third quarter of 2011, and the aggregate balances on the non-recourse loans amounted to approximately $14.7 million. Annualized base rents as of September 30, 2011, for the five mortgaged properties, of which only one is currently occupied by Borders and paying rent, and one which is occupied by Books-A-Million, was approximately $1.2 million, or 3.7% of the Company’s annualized base rent as of September 30, 2011.
As of September 30, 2011, Agree Limited Partnership (the “Operating Partnership”) had in place a $55 million Credit Facility with Bank of America, as the agent, which was guaranteed by the Company (the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility had been extended in January 2009 and was due to mature in November 2011. Advances under the Credit Facility bore interest within a range of one-month to 12-month LIBOR plus 100 basis points to 150 basis points or the lender’s prime rate, at the Company’s option, based on certain factors such as the ratio of the Company’s indebtedness to the capital value of the Company’s properties. The Credit Facility generally was used to fund property acquisitions and development activities. As of September 30, 2011, $42,239,943 was outstanding under the Credit Facility bearing a weighted average interest rate of 1.31%. The Credit Facility was paid off in October 2011 with proceeds from the New Credit Facility (defined below).
23
Agree Realty Corporation
As of September 30, 2011, the Company also had in place a $5 million Line of Credit (“the Line of Credit”) that had been extended in October 2009 and was due to mature in November 2011. The Line of Credit bore interest at the lender’s prime rate less 75 basis points or 150 basis points in excess of the one-month to 12-month LIBOR rate, at the Company’s option. The purpose of the Line of Credit was generally to provide working capital and fund land options and start-up costs associated with new projects. As of September 30, 2011, $1,144,961 was outstanding under the Line of Credit bearing a weighted average interest rate of 2.50%. The Line of Credit was paid off in October 2011 with proceeds of the New Credit Facility (defined below).
In October 2011, the Company closed on a new $85,000,000 unsecured revolving credit facility (the “New Credit Facility”). The New Credit Facility can be increased by up to $50,000,000 at the Company’s request, dependent upon there being one or more lenders willing to acquire the additional commitment, for a total potential credit facility commitment of $135,000,000. The New Credit Facility matures in October 2014, and can be extended for two one-year terms to October 2016 subject to certain conditions. The New Credit Facility bears interest at LIBOR plus a spread of 175 to 260 basis points or the base rate plus a spread of 75 to 160 basis points depending on the Company’s leverage.
As of October 26, 2011 the Company borrowed $54 million on the New Credit Facility and the interest rate was anticipated to be 185 basis points over LIBOR. The net proceeds from the New Credit Facility were used to repay the Credit Facility and Line of Credit.
The New Credit Facility contains customary covenants, including financial covenants regarding debt levels, total liabilities, tangible net worth, fixed charge coverage, unencumbered borrowing base properties, permitted investments etc. The Company was in compliance with the covenant terms at closing.
The following table outlines our contractual obligations, without regard to possible defaults, as of September 30, 2011 for the periods presented below (in thousands).
Total
|
October 1, 2011
– September 30,
2012
|
October 1, 2012
– September 30,
2014
|
October 1, 2014
– September 30,
2016
|
Thereafter
|
||||||||||||||||
Mortgages Payable
|
$ | 65,707 | $ | 4,568 | $ | 30,992 | $ | 9,397 | $ | 20,750 | ||||||||||
Notes Payable
|
43,385 | 43,385 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Land Lease Obligation
|
24,174 | 1,007 | 2,043 | 2,073 | 19,051 | |||||||||||||||
Estimated Interest Payments on Mortgages and Notes Payable
|
17,102 | 4,167 | 5,122 | 3,340 | 4,473 | |||||||||||||||
Other Long-Term Liabilities
|
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 150,368 | $ | 53,127 | $ | 38,157 | $ | 14,810 | $ | 44,274 |
We have two former Borders properties under contract to sell for an aggregate sales price of $4.6 million. Closing of these transactions is subject to the satisfactory completion of the purchasers’ due diligence investigations and other customary conditions, and there is no assurance that the conditions will be satisfied or that the sales will occur as contemplated.
We plan to begin construction of additional pre-leased developments and may acquire additional properties, which will initially be financed by the New Credit Facility. We will periodically refinance short-term construction and acquisition financing with long-term debt and/or equity to the extent available.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of September 30, 2011, we do not engage in any off-balance sheet arrangements with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as structured finance or special purpose entities.
Inflation
Our leases generally contain provisions designed to mitigate the adverse impact of inflation on net income. These provisions include clauses enabling us to pass through to tenants certain operating costs, including real estate taxes, common area maintenance, utilities and insurance, thereby reducing our exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation. Certain of our leases contain clauses enabling us to receive percentage rents based on tenants' gross sales, which generally increase as prices rise, and, in certain cases, escalation clauses, which generally increase rental rates during the terms of the leases. In addition, expiring tenant leases permit us to seek increased rents upon re-lease at market rates if rents are below the then existing market rates.
24
Agree Realty Corporation
Funds from Operations
Funds from Operations (“FFO”) is defined by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. (“NAREIT”) to mean net income computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of property, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Management uses FFO as a supplemental measure to conduct and evaluate our business because there are certain limitations associated with using GAAP net income by itself as the primary measure of our operating performance. Historical cost accounting for real estate assets in accordance with GAAP implicitly assumes that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time. Since real estate values instead have historically risen or fallen with market conditions, management believes that the presentation of operating results for real estate companies that use historical cost accounting is insufficient by itself.
FFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income as the primary indicator of our operating performance or as an alternative to cash flow as a measure of liquidity. Further, while we adhere to the NAREIT definition of FFO, our presentation of FFO is not necessarily comparable to similarly titled measures of other REITs due to the fact that not all REITs use the same definition.
The following table provides a reconciliation of FFO and net income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010:
Three Months Ended
September 30,
|
||||||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||
Net income
|
$ | (1,855,344 | ) | $ | 4,540,568 | |||
Depreciation of real estate assets
|
1,707,807 | 1,458,785 | ||||||
Amortization of leasing costs
|
188,431 | 20,260 | ||||||
Funds from Operations
|
$ | 40,894 | $ | 6,019,613 | ||||
Weighted Average Shares and Operating Partnership Units Outstanding – Dilutive
|
10,014,410 | 9,965,859 |
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
|
||||||||
|
2011
|
2010
|
||||||
Net income
|
$ | 6,668,049 | $ | 18,940,508 | ||||
Depreciation of real estate assets
|
4,880,758 | 4,303,788 | ||||||
Amortization of leasing costs
|
240,718 | 59,049 | ||||||
Gain on sale of asset
|
- | (5,328,333 | ) | |||||
Funds from Operations
|
$ | 11,789,525 | $ | 17,975,012 | ||||
Weighted Average Shares and Operating Partnership Units Outstanding – Dilutive
|
10,016,968 | 9,382,248 |
25
Agree Realty Corporation
ITEM 3.
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
We are exposed to interest rate risk primarily through borrowing activities. There is inherent roll-over risk for borrowings as they mature and are renewed at current market rates. The extent of this risk is not quantifiable or predictable because of the variability of future interest rates and our future financing requirements. Our interest rate risk is monitored using a variety of techniques. The table below presents the principal payments (in thousands) and the weighted average interest rates on outstanding debt, by year of expected maturity, to evaluate the expected cash flows and sensitivity to interest rate changes.
Year ended September 30,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012
|
2013
|
2014
|
2015
|
2016
|
Thereafter
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate mortgage
|
$ | 4,028 | $ | 3,989 | $ | 4,259 | $ | 4,545 | $ | 4,852 | $ | 20,750 | $ | 42,423 | ||||||||||||||
Average interest rate
|
7.85 | % | 7.85 | % | 7.85 | % | 7.85 | % | 7.85 | % | 7.85 | % | — | |||||||||||||||
Variable rate mortgage
|
$ | 540 | $ | 22,744 | — | — | — | — | $ | 23,284 | ||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate
|
3.74 | % | 3.74 | % | 3.74 | % | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Other variable rate debt
|
$ | 43,385 | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 43,385 | |||||||||||||||||||
Average interest rate
|
1.34 | % | — | — | — | — | — | — |
The fair value (in thousands) is estimated at $44,724, $22,733 and $43,385 for fixed rate mortgages, variable rate mortgage and other variable rate debt, respectively, as of September 30, 2011.
The table above incorporates those exposures that exist as of September 30, 2011; it does not consider those exposures or positions, which could arise after that date. As a result, our ultimate realized gain or loss with respect to interest rate fluctuations will depend on the exposures that arise during the period and interest rates.
We entered into an interest rate swap agreement to hedge interest rates on $24.5 million in variable-rate borrowings outstanding. Under the terms of the interest rate swap agreement, we will receive from the counterparty interest on the notional amount based on 1.5% plus one-month LIBOR and will pay to the counterparty a fixed rate of 3.744%. This swap effectively converted $24.5 million of variable-rate borrowings to fixed-rate borrowings. As of September 30, 2011, the interest rate swap was valued at a liability of $759,200. We do not use derivative instruments for trading or other speculative purposes and we did not have any other derivative instruments or hedging activities as of September 30, 2011.
As of September 30, 2011, a 100 basis point increase in interest rates on the portion of our debt bearing interest at variable rates would result in an annual increase in interest expense of approximately $434,000.
ITEM 4.
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
At the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting
26
Agree Realty Corporation
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|
We are not presently involved in any litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any other litigation threatened against us, except for routine litigation arising in the ordinary course of business which is expected to be covered by our liability insurance.
ITEM 1A.
|
RISK FACTORS
|
Other than the following, there were no material changes in our risk factors set forth under Item 1A of Part I of our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K as updated by our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.
27
Agree Realty Corporation
Leveraging our portfolio subjects us to increased risk of loss, including loss of properties in the event of a foreclosure.
At September 30, 2011, our ratio of indebtedness to total market capitalization (assuming conversion of OP units) was approximately 33%. The use of leverage presents an additional element of risk in the event that (1) the cash flow from lease payments on our properties is insufficient to meet debt obligations, (2) we are unable to refinance our debt obligations as necessary or on as favorable terms or (3) there is an increase in interest rates. If a property is mortgaged to secure payment of indebtedness and we are unable to meet mortgage payments, the property could be foreclosed upon with a consequent loss of income and asset value to us. Under the “cross-default” provisions contained in mortgages encumbering some of our properties, our default under a mortgage with a lender would result in our default under mortgages held by the same lender on other properties resulting in multiple foreclosures.
As discussed in more detail above under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” we have five mortgaged properties that were leased to Borders that serve as collateral for five non-recourse loans, including four mortgages that are cross-defaulted and cross-collateralized. As of September 30, 2011, the net book value plus accumulated depreciation of the five mortgaged properties was approximately $18.4 million, and the aggregate balances on the non-recourse loans amounted to approximately $14.7 million. Annualized base rents as of September 30, 2011, for the five mortgaged properties, of which only one is currently occupied by Borders and paying rent, and one which is occupied by Books-A-Million, was approximately $1.2 million, or 3.7% of our total annualized base rents as of September 30, 2011. As of the date of this filing, and directly or indirectly because of the Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing of Borders in February 2011, we are in default on the five mortgage loans. We are in active discussions with lenders for all five loans regarding an appropriate course of action. We can provide no assurance that our negotiations with the lenders will result in favorable outcomes to us. Failure to restructure our mortgage obligations could result in foreclosure actions and loss of the mortgaged properties. In addition, as a result of cross-collateralization or cross-default provisions contained in certain of our mortgage loans, a default under one mortgage loan could result in a default on other indebtedness and cause us to lose other better performing properties, which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
We intend to maintain a ratio of total indebtedness (including construction or acquisition financing) to total market capitalization of 65% or less. Nevertheless, we may operate with debt levels which are in excess of 65% of total market capitalization for extended periods of time. Our organization documents contain no limitation on the amount or percentage of indebtedness which we may incur. Therefore, our board of directors, without a vote of the stockholders, could alter the general policy on borrowings at any time. If our debt capitalization policy were changed, we could become more highly leveraged, resulting in an increase in debt service that could adversely affect our operating cash flow and our ability to make expected distributions to stockholders, and could result in an increased risk of default on our obligations.
ITEM 2.
|
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
|
None.
ITEM 3.
|
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
|
Information related to our defaults on indebtedness is included in Item 2 under “Management’s Discussion of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources” above and is incorporated by reference herein.
ITEM 4.
|
[REMOVED AND RESERVED]
|
ITEM 5.
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
None.
28
Agree Realty Corporation
ITEM 6.
|
EXHIBITS
|
*31.1
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Richard Agree, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
*31.2
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Alan D. Maximiuk, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|
*32.1
|
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Richard Agree, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
*32.2
|
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Alan D. Maximiuk, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|
*101
|
The following materials from Agree Realty Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) related notes to these consolidated financial statements, tagged as blocks of text.
|
As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
*
|
Filed herewith
|
29
Agree Realty Corporation
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Agree Realty Corporation
|
|
/s/ RICHARD AGREE
|
|
Richard Agree
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
and Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
/s/ ALAN D. MAXIMIUK
|
|
Alan D. Maximiuk
|
|
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
|
|
Secretary
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
Date: November 4, 2011
|
30