AiAdvertising, Inc. - Annual Report: 2008 (Form 10-K)
FORM
10-K
U.S.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
[X]
ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF
THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the
fiscal year ended: June 30, 2008
Commission
file number 0-13215
WARP
9, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada
|
30-0050402
|
(State
of Incorporation)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
50
Castilian Dr. Suite 101, Santa Barbara, California 93117
(Address
of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(805)
964-3313
Registrant's
telephone number, including area code
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(B) of the Act:
Title
of Each Class
|
Name
of Each Exchange On
Which
Registered
|
COMMON
STOCK
|
OTC
|
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined
in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act.Yes |_| No |X|
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to filed reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.Yes |_| No |X|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days. Yes
|X|
No |_|
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to
this
Form 10-K. |X|
Indicate
by
check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer
|
[___]
|
Accelerated
filer
|
[___]
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
[___]
|
Smaller
reporting company
|
[_X_]
|
Indicate
by
check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act). Yes
|_|
No |X|
The
aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant
was approximately $3,405,798 as of June 30, 2008.
There
were 340,579,815 shares outstanding of the registrant's Common Stock as of
September 12, 2008.
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
PART
1
|
|||
ITEM
1
|
Business
|
2
|
|
ITEM
2
|
Properties
|
8
|
|
ITEM
3
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
8
|
|
ITEM
4
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
8
|
|
PART
II
|
|||
ITEM
5
|
Market
for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
|
9
|
|
ITEM
6
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
10
|
|
ITEM
7
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation
|
10
|
|
ITEM
8
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
15
|
|
ITEM
9
|
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
|
32
|
|
ITEM
9A(T)
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
32
|
|
ITEM
9B
|
Other
Information
|
34
|
|
PART
III
|
|||
ITEM
10
|
Directors,
Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance
|
34
|
|
ITEM
11
|
Executive
Compensation
|
36
|
|
ITEM
12
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
|
38
|
|
ITEM
13
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
39
|
|
ITEM
14
|
Principal
Accounting Fees and Services
|
39
|
|
ITEM
15
|
Exhibits,
Financial Statement Schedules
|
39
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
41
|
Company
History
Warp
9,
Inc. (“Warp 9” or the “Company”) is a Nevada corporation formerly known as
Roaming Messenger, Inc., formerly known as Latinocare Management Corporation
(“LMC”). On August 24, 2006, the Company’s board of directors and
majority shareholders voted to change the name of the Company from Roaming
Messenger, Inc. to Warp 9, Inc. to reflect a new strategic plan of focusing
primarily on the business of the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Warp 9,
Inc., a Delaware corporation that is an e-commerce Software-as-a-Service
(“SaaS”) provider.
General
We
are a
provider of e-commerce software platforms and services for the catalog and
retail industry. Our suite of software platforms are designed to help
multi-channel retailers maximize the Internet channel by applying our
technologies for online e-commerce, e-mail marketing campaigns, and interactive
visual merchandising. Offered as an outsourced and fully managed
Software-as-a-Service (“SaaS”) model, our products allow customers to focus on
their core business, rather than technical implementations and software and
hardware architecture, design, and maintenance. We also offer
professional services to our clients which include online catalog design,
merchandizing and optimization, order management, e-mail marketing campaign
development, integration to third party payment processing and fulfillment
systems, analytics, custom reporting and strategic consultation.
Our
products and services allow our clients to lower costs and focus on promoting
and marketing their brand, product line and website while leveraging the
investments we have made in technology and infrastructure to operate a dynamic
online Internet presence.
We
charge
our customers a monthly fee for using our e-commerce software based on a
Software-as-a-Service model. These recurring fees include fixed
monthly charges, and variable fees based on the sales volume of our clients’
e-commerce websites. Unlike traditional software companies that sell software
on
a perpetual license where quarterly and annual revenues are quite difficult
to
predict, our SaaS model spreads the collection of contract revenue over several
quarters or years and makes our revenues more predictable for a longer period
of
time.
While
the
Warp 9 Internet Commerce System (“ICS”) is our flagship and highest revenue
product, we have been developing and deploying new products based on a
proprietary virtual publishing technology that we have developed. These new
products will allow for the creation of interactive web versions of paper
catalogs and magazines where users can flip through pages with a mouse and
click
on products or advertisements. These magazines or catalogs will have built-in
integration for e-commerce transactions through our ICS product and other
transaction based activities. Accordingly, when shoppers click on a product,
they are taken to the e-commerce product page where they can add that product
to
their shopping cart for purchasing. Clients utilizing this technology have
discovered when exposing consumers to the virtual catalogs, a higher average
order size and significant increase in rate of conversion result. We have been
selling this solution on a limited basis as a professional service while we
refine the product and technology. We believe there are many markets
for our virtual catalog and magazine technology and we intend to test market
these new products in the near future.
On
October 23, 2007, we licensed our patent-pending mobile technology and certain
trademarks on a non-exclusive basis to Zingerang Software. Under the terms
of
the agreement, Warp 9 will retain ownership of the technology and trademarks,
as
well as any improvements and derivatives created by Zingerang Software. Warp
9
is entitled to receive royalties based on revenues from sales if any, generated
by Zingerang Software. This agreement allows us to enhance and augment our
technology and intellectual property portfolio without using direct resources,
and still allows us to seek other licensing options in the future.
-2-
Industry
Overview
Growth
of the Internet and E-Commerce
Online
retailing and e-commerce sales continue to grow. The U.S. Commerce
Department reported that e-commerce sales in the fourth quarter of 2007 rose
18.4% compared to the fourth quarter of 2006, continuing a series of strong
quarterly growth reports. According to the 2008 State
of
Retailing Online report from Forrester Research, online sales will continue
to
rise 17 percent to $204 billion this year alone. According to the report,
search
engine marketing continues to be the most effective way to reach new customers
and is also emerging as a great customer retention tool. The apparel
category ($26.6 billion) continues to lead as the largest sales
category.
We
believe there are a number of factors that are contributing to the growth
of
e-commerce: (i) adoption of the Internet continues to increase globally;
(ii) broadband technology is becoming more widely available and the
adoption of broadband for Internet use is increasing at a rapid rate;
(iii) Internet users are increasingly comfortable with the process of
buying products online; (iv) the functionality of online stores continues
to improve, a greater range of payment options are available, and special
offers
and shipping discounts are making online shopping more attractive;
(v) businesses are placing more emphasis on their online stores as they can
reach a larger audience at a comparatively lower cost than the methods used
to
drive traffic to traditional brick-and-mortar retail stores or sell through
printed paper catalogs. As a result of these growth drivers, retailers and
catalogers have begun to build large, global customer bases that can be reached
cost-effectively, potentially resulting in higher sales and
profitability.
Opportunities
for Outsourced E-Commerce
We
believe there are advantages to outsourced e-commerce that will continue
to make
solutions like those of Warp 9 an attractive alternative to building and
maintaining this capability in-house. These advantages include:
(i) eliminating the substantial up-front and ongoing costs of computer
hardware, network infrastructure and specialized application software and
personnel; (ii) reducing the time it takes to get online stores live and
productive; (iii) shifting the ongoing technology, financial, regulatory
and compliance risks to a proven service provider; (iv) leveraging the
expertise of an e-commerce service provider to accelerate growth of an online
business; and (v) allowing businesses to focus on their specific core
competencies.
Technology
Products
We
primarily offer four proprietary software systems to our customers – e-commerce,
e-mail marketing, virtual catalog publishing, and virtual magazine
publishing. It is our product development goal to create other
complementary systems to deliver a fully integrated platform for a successful
e-commerce operation.
Warp
9 Internet Commerce System (Warp 9 ICS)
The
Warp
9 ICS is an enterprise-grade software system that enables catalogers and
retailers to expand their operation to the Internet with minimal investment,
overhead and risk. A business does not need to invest in new hardware or
software in order to utilize the Warp 9 ICS, because it is offered as a fully
managed online e-commerce system hosted in our Internet
datacenter. With a range of easy to use and highly customizable
features for product presentation as well store management, Warp 9 ICS satisfies
many of the current and next generation requirements of catalogers and
retailers. We charge our customers a recurring monthly fee for using
the Warp 9 ICS software based on 12, 24 and 36 month term agreements. There
are
various pricing packages for Warp 9 ICS, depending on the customer’s desired
level of scalability and reliability.
Warp
9
ICS is designed with a highly scalable enterprise architecture that allows
us to
provide our customers with maximum performance and system uptime. As
our customer base or transaction volume grows, we simply add new servers, CPUs,
memory and bandwidth without substantial changes to the ICS
software. The high end version of the Warp 9 ICS offering operates on
a cluster of load balanced and fault-tolerant servers in our
datacenter. If a server in the cluster fails for any reason, the
architecture shifts the traffic to other available servers, thus minimizing
downtime and disruption to our customers’ mission critical e-commerce
websites.
-3-
Warp
9 E-mail Marketing System (Warp 9 EMS)
Warp
9
EMS is a web-based e-mail campaign and list management system designed for
high
performance and reliability. EMS's sophisticated technology will allow markets
to send targeted e-mail campaigns that help grow, retain and maximize the
lifetime value of their customers. Through content personalization and list
segmentation, campaign efforts will result in higher response rates, higher
conversion rates and improved customer loyalty. E-mail marketing systems, such
as Warp 9 EMS, enable unprecedented response times that are not achievable
through traditional forms of direct marketing. ICS customers can also purchase
EMS to complement their online e-commerce strategy.
Warp
9 Virtual Catalog System (Warp 9 VCS)
Warp
9
VCS creates an interactive digital experience for online
customers. The VCS product creates a unique shopping environment
using Warp 9’s virtual publishing technology to deliver an increase in
multi-channel sales. Readers can bend and flip through virtual pages
as they read the online catalog, zoom into product descriptions and images,
and
click on products to bring them to the relevant transactional e-commerce product
pages. Warp 9's virtual publishing technology transforms a catalog from a static
medium to a dynamic, interactive, and transactional medium. VCS product allows
the cataloger to extend the life of a print property and allows for increased
conversion rates.
Warp
9 Virtual Magazine System (Warp 9 VMS)
Warp
9
VMS is an interactive magazine publishing interface with enhanced features
which
creates an extremely appealing and interactive digital experience of a print
magazine for online viewers. Readers are engaged with an experience
that mimics the paper version of the magazine, allowing readers to bend and
flip
through virtual pages as they read the online magazine, zoom into articles
and
pictures, and click on advertisements. The VMS product allows a magazine
publisher to extend the life of a print property and adds value to advertisers
by creating additional revenue opportunities by providing a shorter, more direct
path between readers and advertisers.
Professional
Services
Our
customers are not technology companies and have varying internal expertise
in
the areas of e-commerce, online marketing and web technologies. To provide
a
complete solution to our customers, we also offer professional services to
help
our customers maximize the use of our technology or other online e-commerce
technologies. Professional services include but not limited to
e-commerce web page template development, e-mail campaign content creation,
custom system configuration, graphics design, management of online marketing
programs, and integration to backend business systems.
Site
Design and Development
We
offer
our clients site design services that utilize our experience and expertise
to
create efficient and effective online stores powered by Warp 9
ICS. Our e-commerce solutions can be deployed quickly for our clients
and implemented in a variety of ways from simple shopping websites to complex
systems that integrate to backend inventory management systems. This
is all done by maximally using the feature set of Warp 9 ICS.
Merchandizing
and Promotions Design
The
Warp
9 ICS technology platform supports a wide range of merchandising
activities. On an ongoing basis, we help our clients create effective
promotional activities, up-sell, cross-sell as well as promote featured products
during any phase of the shopping process. By doing so, our
professional services team continues to work with our clients to deliver
targeted offers designed to increase conversion ratios and average order
size.
-4-
Advanced
Reporting and Analytics
Warp
9
ICS captures a great deal of information about sales and visitor activities
in
its database. We provide our clients access to a collection of
standard and customizable reports as well as create any report they need for
their individual business making decisions. For example, we can
create custom reports to help our clients analyze the average orders size of
one
design versus and another. This enables our clients to track and
analyze sales, products, transactions and customer behavior to further refine
their market strategies to increase sales.
Strategic
Marketing Services
We
offer
a wide range of strategic marketing services designed to increase customer
acquisition, retention and lifetime value. Through a combination of web
analytics, analytics-based statistical testing and optimization, our team of
strategic marketing consultants develop, deliver and manage programs such as
paid search advertising, search engine optimization, affiliate marketing, store
optimization and e-mail optimization for our clients. We believe our ability
to
capture and analyze integrated traffic and commerce data enhances the value
of
our strategic marketing services as we can precisely determine the effectiveness
of specific marketing activities, website changes, and other actions taken
by
our clients.
Revenue
Model
We
charge
our customers a recurring monthly fee, based on term contracts, to use the
Warp
9 ICS and Warp 9 EMS products under a Software-as-a-Service (“SaaS”)
model. Unlike traditional software companies that sell software on a
perpetual license where quarterly and annual revenues are very difficult to
predict, our SaaS model spreads the collection of contracts over several
quarters or years and makes our revenues more predictable for a longer period
of
time.
The
Company also generates revenue by offering professional web production, graphic
design, marketing, and other consulting services to support Warp 9 products
and
generally to aid in the operations of our customers’ e-commerce
activities.
Benefits
to Clients
Our
complete solution of providing robust technology along with complementary
professional services delivers many benefits to our customers which help drive
our continual growth.
Reduced
Total Cost of Ownership and Risk
Utilizing
our technology and services, businesses can dramatically reduce or eliminate
upfront and ongoing hardware, software, maintenance and support costs associated
with developing, customizing, deploying and upgrading an in-house e-commerce
solution. They can have a global e-commerce presence without assuming the
costs
and risks of developing it themselves and take immediate advantage of the
investments we continually make in our e-commerce systems and associated
services. Our ongoing investment in the latest technologies and e-commerce
functionality helps ensure that our clients maintain pace with industry
advances.
Revenue
Growth
Through
our team of services consultants, we help our clients grow their businesses
by
applying our technology and experience to (i) increase the acquisition,
retention and lifetime value of new customers; (ii) extending their
businesses into new geographic markets; and (iii) expanding the visibility
and sales of their products through new online sales channels. We have developed
substantial expertise in online marketing and merchandising, which we apply
to
help our clients increase traffic to their online stores, and improve order
close ratios, average order sizes and repeat purchases, all of which are
designed to generate higher revenues for our clients’ businesses and greater
revenue for Warp 9.
-5-
Deployment
Speed
Businesses
can reduce the time required to develop an e-commerce presence by utilizing
our
outsourced business model. Typically, a new client can have an online store
live
much more quickly than if they decided to build, test and deploy the e-commerce
capability in-house. Once they are operational on our platform, clients can
utilize our remote control toolset to make real-time changes to their online
store, allowing them to address issues and take advantage of opportunities
without technical assistance.
Focus
on Core Competency
By
utilizing our outsourced e-commerce model, businesses can focus on developing,
marketing and selling their products rather than devoting time and resources
to
building and maintaining an e-commerce infrastructure. Management can focus
their time on their core business while ensuring they have access to the
latest
technologies, tools and expertise for running a successful e-commerce
operation.
Sales
and Marketing
Our
objective is to be the leading provider of outsourced e-commerce solutions
for
online catalog and retail operations. To achieve this objective, we
intend to enhance, promote and support the idea that Warp 9 is the complete
provider of the necessary technology platform and professional services to
effectively conduct a serious e-commerce operation.
We
currently market our e-commerce solutions directly to clients and prospective
clients. We focus our efforts on generating awareness of the Warp 9
brand and capabilities and establishing our position as a leader in the online
e-commerce space. Our sales team calls on senior marketing and IT
executives within a retailer or catalog company who are looking to create or
expand their e-commerce operation. During the client sales process,
our sales staff delivers demonstrations, presentations, collateral material,
return-on-investment analyses, proposals and contracts.
A
great
deal of our new customers comes from word-of-mouth referrals to due to the
fact
that Warp 9 has been in the industry for a number of years with strong
references and proven track record. Prospective clients quite often
look for us at tradeshows to learn more about Warp 9 based on the
recommendations of our existing customers. Word-of-mouth referrals
have been very valuable to us and we intend to continue nurturing our customer
and industry relationship to maximize these referrals.
While
our
success to date has been from direct sales efforts, we intend to explore a
channel partner strategy to expand our customer base quickly in the fiscal
quarters to come. Prospective channel partners include consultants
and designers in the catalog industry, as well as backend order fulfillment
systems providers and providers of complimentary services or
products. With the growing maturity of multi-channel e-commerce
strategies, many of the robust backend systems providers are looking for robust
front-end e-commerce system, like Warp 9 ICS, to deliver a fully integrated
online/offline solution to their clients.
Competition
The
market for e-commerce solutions is highly competitive, especially as it reaches
maturity. We compete with e-commerce solutions that our customers develop
themselves or contract with third parties to develop. We also compete with
other
outsourced e-commerce providers. The competition we encounter
includes:
·
|
In-house
development of e-commerce capabilities using tools or applications
from
companies such as Art Technology Group, Broadvision, and
IBM;
|
·
|
E-Commerce
capabilities custom-developed by companies such as IBM Global Services,
and Accenture, Inc.;
|
·
|
Other
providers of outsourced e-commerce solutions, such as GSI Commerce,
Inc.,
Macrovision Corporation, asknet Inc. and eSellerate,
Inc.;
|
-6-
|
|
·
|
Companies
that provide technologies, services or products that support a
portion of
the e-commerce process, such as payment processing, including CyberSource
Corporation and PayPal Corp.;
|
·
|
High-traffic
branded websites that generate a substantial portion of their revenue
from
e-commerce and may offer or provide to others the means to offer
their
products for sale, such as Amazon.com,
Inc.; and
|
·
|
Web
hosting, web services and infrastructure companies that offer portions
of
our solution and are seeking to expand the range of their offering,
such
as Network Solutions, LLC, Akamai Technologies, Inc., Yahoo! Inc.,
eBay
Inc. and Hostopia.com Inc.
|
Patents
and Patent Applications
Our
intellectual property portfolio consists of the following patent and patent
applications, which primarily relate to the Roaming Messenger
technology:
Self
Contained Business Transaction Capsules
A
self-contained business transaction capsule, or eCapsule, is a small electronic
capsule that contains all the necessary data and logic to complete a business
transaction. The eCapsule is a “thin” and “lightweight” small computer-readable
file that is device independent. The eCapsule allows a business, for example,
to
encapsulate an individual product or offer into an intelligent object that
is
capable of completing entire transactions. The eCapsule includes data about
the
product or service being provided, such as the product price, a textual
description, or options for the product or service (a transaction description).
The eCapsule also includes transaction logic or business logic capable of
completing the transaction, such as billing and shipping information, order
routing information, order status information, shipping status information,
and
any other transaction rules necessary to process the transaction. Moreover,
the
eCapsule is adapted to be broadcasted to, and stored on, a portable electronic
device, such as a mobile wireless-enabled device, like a cellular telephone,
a
personal digital assistant (PDA) or a laptop computer. This patent was issued
on
September 12, 2006.
A
Method of and Instruction Set for Executing Operations on a
Device
This
invention relates to executable instructions and, more particularly, to
instructions that are executable on a device that receives a mobile
agent. This patent application discloses the actual implementation of
the Roaming Messenger device engine and messenger instruction sets and modes
of
execution. The application for this patent was filed on December 7,
2004.
Utilizing
Mobile Devices as a Communication Proxy for Non-Connected
Terminals
This
invention is a method and system in which terminals, appliances and machines
without dedicated Internet connections can complete Internet based transactions
by piggy-backing on the connection of the user's handheld device. An example
of
an application of this invention is a vending machine that can conduct
electronic wireless payments without having an internal wireless device that
communicates with a server on the Internet. Existing solutions require the
vending machine to be equipped with an internal cell phone. Using this
invention, the vending machine can communicate with the consumer's handheld
device via Infrared or Bluetooth and simply uses the handheld device as the
conduit to the Internet for remote payment processing. This invention also
covers many other applications including secured doorways, factory floors and
smart data acquisition sensors. The application for this patent was filed on
February 21, 2002.
-7-
Government
Regulation
We
are
subject to various federal, state, and local laws affecting e-commerce and
communication businesses. The Federal Trade Commission and equivalent state
agencies regulate advertising and representations made by businesses in the
sale
of their products, which apply to us. We are also subject to
government laws and regulations governing health, safety, working conditions,
employee relations, wrongful termination, wages, taxes and other matters
applicable to businesses in general.
Employees
As
of
September 12, 2008, we had twelve full time employees, four of whom are employed
in administrative, marketing, and sales positions, and eight technical
employees employed in research, development, and technical product maintenance
positions.
All
of
our employees have executed agreements that impose nondisclosure obligations
on
the employee and assign to us (to the extent permitted by California law) all
copyrights and other inventions created by the employee during his employment
with us. Additionally, we have a trade secret protection policy in place that
management believes to be adequate to protect our intellectual property and
trade secrets.
Seasonality
We
do not
anticipate that our business will be substantially affected by
seasonality.
Trademarks
We
have
registered trademarks for Roaming Messenger®, eCapsule®, and Warp
9®.
ITEM
2. PROPERTIES
The
Company currently leases approximately 8,605 square feet of office space at
50
Castilian Dr., Suite 101, Santa Barbara, California 93117 for approximately
$11,639 per month, pursuant to a six year lease agreement with rent commencing
on October 1, 2004.
The
Company may be involved in legal actions and claims arising in the ordinary
course of business, from time to time, none of which at the time are considered
to be material to the Company’s business or financial condition.
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
-8-
PART
II
The
Company's common stock trades on the OTC Bulletin Board Market under the symbol
“WNYN.” The range of high and low bid quotations for each fiscal quarter within
the last three fiscal years was as follows:
Year
Ended June 30, 2008
|
High
|
Low
|
First
Quarter ended September 30, 2007
|
$0.025
|
$0.013
|
Second
Quarter ended December 31, 2007
|
$0.017
|
$0.006
|
Third
Quarter ended March 31, 2008
|
$0.008
|
$0.0032
|
Fourth
Quarter ended June 30, 2008
|
$0.019
|
$0.0015
|
Year
Ended June 30, 2007
|
High
|
Low
|
First
Quarter ended September 30, 2006
|
$0.02
|
$0.01
|
Second
Quarter ended December 31, 2006
|
$0.03
|
$0.01
|
Third
Quarter ended March 31, 2007
|
$0.03
|
$0.01
|
Fourth
Quarter ended June 30, 2007
|
$0.03
|
$0.02
|
Year
Ended June 30, 2006
|
High
|
Low
|
First
Quarter ended September 30, 2005
|
$0.19
|
$0.09
|
Second
Quarter ended December 31, 2005
|
$0.15
|
$0.07
|
Third
Quarter ended March 31, 2006
|
$0.09
|
$0.05
|
Fourth
Quarter ended June 30, 2006
|
$0.06
|
$0.02
|
The
above
quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail markup, mark-down, or
commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
The
Company is authorized to issue 495,000,000 shares of common stock, par value
$0.001 per share, and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001
per
share. The rights, preferences and privileges of the holders of the
preferred stock will be determined by the Board of Directors prior to issuance
of such shares.
As
of
June 30, 2008, there were approximately 319 record holders of the Company's
common stock, not including shares held in “street name” in brokerage accounts
which are unknown. As of June 30 2008, there were approximately
340,579,815 shares of common stock outstanding on record.
The
Company has not declared or paid any cash dividends on its common stock and
does
not anticipate paying dividends for the foreseeable future.
Effective
July 10, 2003, the Company adopted the Warp 9, Inc. 2003 Stock Option Plan
for
Directors, Officers, Employees and Key Consultants (the “Plan”) authorizing the issuance
of up to 25,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the grant
and exercise of up to 25,000,000 stock options. The Plan has been
approved by the holders of the outstanding shares of the Company. The
following table sets forth certain information regarding the Plan as of June
30,
2008:
-9-
Number
of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding stock
options
|
Weighted-average
exercise price of outstanding stock options
|
Number
of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity
compensation plans
|
|
Equity
compensation plans approved by security holders
|
14,350,000
|
$0.02
|
7,875,000
|
During
the quarter ended September 30, 2007, the Company issued 17,372,810 shares
of
common stock ranging from $0.0109 per share to $0.011 per share to Cornell
Capital Partners, LLP for the conversion of $190,000 of principal balance of
that certain $1,200,000 debenture issued to Cornell in December 2005 (the 2005
Cornell Note”). The shares were issued pursuant to Rule 506 of
Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities
Act”).
During
the quarter ended December 31, 2007, the Company issued 11,235,955 shares of
common stock for $0.0089 per share to Cornell Capital Partners, LLP for the
conversion of $100,000 of principal balance of the 2005 Cornell
Note. The shares were issued pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D of
the Securities Act.
During
the quarter ended March 31, 2008, the Company issued 38,635,583 shares of common
stock ranging from $0.0023 per share to $0.004 per share to Cornell Capital
Partners, LLP for the conversion of $135,673.91 of principal balance of the
2005
Cornell Note. The shares were issued pursuant to Rule 506 of
Regulation D of the Securities Act.
During
the quarter ended June 30, 2008, the Company issued 45,425,339 shares of common
stock ranging from $0.0013 per share to $0.0026 per share to Cornell Capital
Partners, LLP for the conversion of $83,900 of principal balance of the 2005
Cornell Note. The shares were issued pursuant to Rule 506 of
Regulation D of the Securities Act.
On
June
10, 2008, Warp 9 prepaid the remaining balance due under the 2005 Cornell Note
or $620,846, effectively terminating the loan. Warp 9 acquired a portion of
the
funding necessary to prepay the remaining balance of the 2005 Cornell Note
from
the proceeds of the sale of 5,000,000 shares of common stock of Carbon Sciences,
Inc. for $500,000 to Cumorah Capital, Inc.
ITEM
6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
None.
Cautionary
Statements
This
Form
10-K contains financial projections and other “forward-looking statements,” as
that term is used in federal securities laws, about Warp 9 Inc.’s (“Warp 9” or
the “Company”) financial condition, results of operations and
business. These statements include, among others: statements
concerning the potential for revenues and expenses and other matters that are
not historical facts. These statements may be made expressly in this
Form 10-K. You can find many of these statements by looking for words
such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” or similar
expressions used in this Form 10-K. These forward-looking statements
are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties that may cause
the
Company's actual results to be materially different from any future results
expressed or implied by the Company in those statements. The most important
facts that could prevent the Company from achieving its stated goals include,
but are not limited to, the following:
-10-
|
(a)
|
volatility
or decline of the Company's stock
price;
|
|
(b)
|
potential
fluctuation in quarterly results;
|
|
(c)
|
failure
of the Company to earn revenues or
profits;
|
|
(d)
|
inadequate
capital to continue or expand its business, and inability to raise
additional capital or financing to implement its business
plans;
|
|
(e)
|
failure
to further commercialize its technology or to make
sales;
|
|
(f)
|
reduction
in demand for the Company's products and
services;
|
|
(g)
|
rapid
and significant changes in markets;
|
|
(h)
|
litigation
with or legal claims and allegations by outside
parties;
|
|
(i)
|
insufficient
revenues to cover operating costs;
|
|
(j)
|
failure
of the relicensing or other commercialization of the Roaming Messenger
technology to produce revenues or
profits;
|
|
(k)
|
adverse
impact of outstanding convertible debenture on Company's stock
price.
|
There
is
no assurance that the company will be profitable, the Company may not be able
to
successfully develop, manage or market its products and services, the Company
may not be able to attract or retain qualified executives and technology
personnel, the Company may not be able to obtain customers for its products
or
services, the Company’s products and services may become obsolete, government
regulation may hinder the Company’s business, additional dilution in outstanding
stock ownership may be incurred due to the issuance of more shares, warrants
and
stock options, the exercise of outstanding warrants and stock options, and
other
risk inherent in the Company’s businesses.
Because
the statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, actual results may differ
materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.
The Company cautions you not to place undue reliance on the statements, which
speak only as of the date of this Form 10-K. The cautionary statements contained
or referred to in this section should be considered in connection with any
subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements that the Company or
persons acting on its behalf may issue. The Company does not undertake any
obligation to review or confirm analysts' expectations or estimates or to
release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements to reflect
events or circumstances after the date of this Form 10-K or to reflect the
occurrence of unanticipated events.
The
following discussion should be read in conjunction with our condensed
consolidated financial statements and notes to those statements. In addition
to
historical information, the following discussion and other parts of this
quarterly report contain forward-looking information that involves risks and
uncertainties.
Current
Overview
We
are a
provider of e-commerce software platforms and services for the catalog and
retail industry. Our suite of software platforms are designed to help
multi-channel retailers maximize the Internet channel by applying our
technologies for online e-commerce, e-mail marketing campaigns, and interactive
visual merchandising. Offered as an outsourced and fully managed
Software-as-a-Service (“SaaS”) model, our products allow customers to focus on
their core business, rather than technical implementations and software and
hardware architecture, design, and maintenance. We also offer
professional services to our clients which include online catalog design,
merchandizing and optimization, order management, e-mail marketing campaign
development, integration to third party payment processing and fulfillment
systems, analytics, custom reporting and strategic
consultation.
-11-
Our
products and services allow our clients to lower costs and focus on promoting
and marketing their brand, product line and website while leveraging the
investments we have made in technology and infrastructure to operate a dynamic
online e-commerce operation.
We
charge
our customers a recurring monthly fee for using our e-commerce software based
on
a Software-as-a-Service model. These fees include fixed monthly
charges, and variable fees based on the sales volume of our clients’ e-commerce
websites. Unlike traditional software companies that sell software on
a perpetual license where quarterly and annual revenues are quite difficult
to
predict, our SaaS model spreads the collection of contract revenue over several
quarters or years and makes our revenues more predictable for a longer period
of
time.
While
the
Warp 9 Internet Commerce System (“ICS”) is our flagship and highest revenue
product, we have been developing and deploying new products based on a
proprietary virtual publishing technology that we have developed. These new
products have allowed for the creation of interactive web versions of paper
catalogs (“VCS”) and magazines (“VMS”) where users can flip through pages with a
mouse and click on products or advertisements. These magazines or catalogs
will
have built-in integration for e-commerce transactions through our ICS product
and other transaction based activities. Clients utilizing this technology have
discovered when exposing consumers to virtual catalogs, a higher average order
size and significant increase in rate of conversion result. We have been selling
this solution on a limited basis as a professional service while we refine
the
product and technology. We believe there are many markets for our virtual
catalog and magazine technology and we intend to test market these new products
in greater distribution in the near future.
Research
and development (“R&D”) efforts have been focused both on these new products
and on updating our current products with new features. In the planning phase
of
these new features, we look to direct client feedback and feature requests;
we
study the e-commerce landscape to determine features that will provide our
clients with a competitive advantage in producing greater and more effective
selling; and we also examine features that will create a competitive advantage
during our sales process to clients. Emerging and declining trends also play
a
role in how clients perceive what features should be provided by which vendors
and we are sometimes able to capitalize on these opportunities by bundling
features for greater value and/or increased fees and revenue.
The
results of operation for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2008 reflect one
complete year of the Company focusing exclusively on the Warp 9 e-commerce
products and services. In September 2006, we ceased our Roaming Messenger
business and reduced our staff significantly in order to focus on our Warp
9
business.
Approximately
half of the Company’s revenues are from the ICS product, which continues to be a
growing product. During the fiscal year ending June 30, 2008, the ICS product
accounted for 49% of gross revenue. The monthly recurring fee for
Warp 9 ICS is generally variable with the growth of a client’s online
revenues. Therefore, when our customers sell more online, our
revenues and profit margin increase without dramatic increase in costs. EMS
is a
smaller revenue-generating product and usually sold to customers already
subscribing to the ICS product. During the fiscal year ending June 30, 2008,
the
EMS product accounted for 2% of gross revenue. VCS and VMS are newer
products and are currently only being sold on a limited basis while they are
further developed. During the fiscal year ending June 30, 2008, VMS and VCS
sales accounted for 4% of gross revenue. During the fiscal year
ending June 30, 2008, the professional services accounted for 29% of gross
revenue.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Our
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations,
including the discussion on liquidity and capital resources, are based upon
our
financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these
financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect
the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, management
re-evaluates its estimates and judgments, particularly those related to the
determination of the estimated recoverable amounts of trade accounts receivable,
impairment of long-lived assets, revenue recognition and deferred tax assets.
We
believe the following critical accounting policies require more significant
judgment and estimates used in the preparation of the financial
statements.
-12-
We
maintain an allowance for doubtful
accounts for estimated losses that may arise if any of our customers are unable
to make required payments. Management specifically analyzes the age of customer
balances, historical bad debt experience, customer credit-worthiness, and
changes in customer payment terms when making estimates of the uncollectability
of our trade accounts receivable balances. If we determine that the financial
conditions of any of our customers deteriorated, whether due to customer
specific or general economic issues, increases in the allowance may be made.
Accounts receivable are written off when all collection attempts have
failed.
We
follow
the provisions of Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") 101, "Revenue Recognition
in
Financial Statements" for revenue recognition and SAB 104. Under Staff
Accounting Bulletin 101, four conditions must be met before revenue can be
recognized: (i) there is persuasive evidence that an arrangement exists, (ii)
delivery has occurred or service has been rendered, (iii) the price is fixed
or
determinable and (iv) collection is reasonably assured.
Income
taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Under this method,
to the extent that we believe that the deferred tax asset is not likely to
be
recovered, a valuation allowance is provided. In making this determination,
we
consider estimated future taxable income and taxable timing differences expected
in the future. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
REVENUE
Total
revenue for the twelve month period ended June 30, 2008 decreased by ($387,344)
to $2,349,665 from $ 2,737,009 in the prior year, a decrease of
14%. The difference is primarily due to the elimination of prior
pass-through third party online marketing services ($377,369). There was also
a
near corresponding shift of a decrease in professional services provided by
us,
and an increase of $167,656 in ICS Monthly revenue.
COST
OF
REVENUE
The
cost
of revenue for the twelve month period ended June 30, 2008 decreased by
($375,850) to $143,635 as compared to $519,485 for the twelve month period
ended
June 30, 2007. As a percentage of revenue, cost of revenue decreased
for the period ended June 30, 2008 to 6% as compared to 19% for the twelve-month
period ended June 30, 2007. The decrease in the cost of revenue is a
result of the elimination of pass-through third party online marketing
services.
SELLING,
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Selling,
general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses decreased by ($324,404) during
the twelve months ended June 30, 2008 to $1,545,981 as compared to
$1,870,385 for the twelve month period ended June 30, 2007. The
decrease in SG&A expenses was primarily due to the elimination of the
Roaming Messenger operations and a reduction in certain ongoing vendor provided
professional services and insurance.
RESEARCH
AND DEVELOPMENT
Research
and development expenses decreased by ($62,677) during the twelve months ended
June 30, 2008 to $48,735 as compared to $111,412 for the twelve months ended
June 30, 2007. The decrease in R&D was due primarily to the elimination in
Roaming Messenger operations, offset by the increase in R&D by Warp 9
e-commerce development.
DEPRECIATION
AND AMORTIZATION
Expense
related to depreciation and amortization was $141,059 for the twelve months
ended June 30, 2008 as compared to $194,046 for the prior year. The
decrease is due to decreased amortization expenses related to the Cornell
convertible debenture and decreased depreciation of other
equipment.
-13-
OTHER
INCOME AND EXPENSE
Total
other income and expense was $386,306 for the twelve months ended June 30,
2008
as compared to ($51,326) for the prior year. The change is primarily
due to the gain realized by us from the sale of shares of another company owned
by us as an investment, and the repayment and redemption of the Cornell
convertible debenture in 2008, and to a lesser degree, a decrease in stock
option expense and other income, and an increase in interest
income.
NET
INCOME
For
the
twelve months ended June 30, 2008, Warp 9’s consolidated net income was
$2,922,069 as compared to a consolidated net loss of ($13,533) for the twelve
months ended June 30, 2007. This increase in net income is a result
of the reduction of expenses associated with the elimination of Roaming
Messenger operations, an increase in sales of the Warp 9 ICS product line,
and a
gain on the sale of an investment of $498,750 - amounting to income of
$856,561, before tax adjustments. Also included in the 2008 fiscal year is
a
recognized tax benefit of $2,065,508 resulting from the recognition of deferred
tax assets related to net operating loss carryforwards.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Warp
9
had cash as of June 30, 2008 of $680,649 as compared to cash of $431,841 as
of
June 30, 2007. Warp 9 had a net working capital (i.e. the difference
between current assets and current liabilities) of $649,976 as of June 30,
2008
as compared to a net working deficit of ($80,342) at June 30, 2008.
Cash
flow
provided by operating activities was $447,544 for the year ended June 30, 2008
as compared to $103,228 for the year ended June 30, 2007.
Cash
flow
provided by investing activities was $495,645 for the year ended June 30, 2008
as compared to cash flow used in investing activities ($4,952) for the year
ended June 30, 2007.
Cash
flow
used by financing activities was ($694,381) for the year ended June 30, 2008
as
compared to ($53,615) during the year ended June 30, 2007.
For
the
twelve months ended, June 30, 2008, the Company’s capital needs have primarily
been met from positive cash-flow from operations.
While
Warp 9 expects that its capital needs in the foreseeable future may be met
by
cash-on-hand and positive cash-flow, there is no assurance that the Company
will
have sufficient capital to finance its growth and business operations, or that
such capital will be available on terms that are favorable to the Company or
at
all. In the current financial environment, it has been difficult for
the Company to obtain equipment leases and other business financing. There
is no assurance that Warp 9 would be able to obtain additional working capital
through the private placement of common stock or from any other
source.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
None.
-14-
ITEM
8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA OF WARP 9,
INC.
WARP
9, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTENTS
PAGE
|
||
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
16
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
17
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
|
18
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Shareholders’ Deficit
|
19
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
20
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
21-31
|
-15-
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To
the
Board of Directors
Warp
9,
Inc.
Santa
Barbara, California
We
have
audited the consolidated balance sheets of Warp 9, Inc. and Subsidiary as
of
June 30, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
In
our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Warp 9, Inc. and Subsidiary
as of June 30, 2008 and 2007, and the results of their operations and their
cash
flows for years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles.
We
were
not engaged to examine management's assertion about the effectiveness of
Warp 9,
Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2008, included
in the accompanying Form 10-K and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion
thereon.
/s/HJ
Associates & Consultants, LLP
Salt
Lake
City, Utah
September
29, 2008
-16-
WARP9,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET
June
30, 2008
|
June
30, 2007
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
|
$ |
680,649
|
$ |
431,841
|
||||
Accounts
Receivable, net
|
290,920
|
226,230
|
||||||
Prepaid
and Other Current Assets
|
16,679
|
8,080
|
||||||
Current
Portion of Deferred Tax Asset
|
38,849
|
-
|
||||||
TOTAL
CURRENT ASSETS
|
1,027,097
|
666,151
|
||||||
PROPERTY
& EQUIPMENT, at cost
|
||||||||
Furniture,
Fixtures & Equipment
|
89,485
|
89,485
|
||||||
Computer
Equipment
|
505,603
|
501,248
|
||||||
Commerce
Server
|
50,000
|
50,000
|
||||||
Computer
Software
|
9,476
|
9,476
|
||||||
654,564
|
650,209
|
|||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
(555,947 | ) | (490,211 | ) | ||||
NET
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
|
98,617
|
159,998
|
||||||
OTHER
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Lease
Deposit
|
9,749
|
9,749
|
||||||
Restricted
Cash
|
93,000
|
93,000
|
||||||
Internet
Domain, net
|
1,062
|
1,233
|
||||||
Investment
in Zingerang
|
-
|
1,250
|
||||||
Loan
cost
|
-
|
75,151
|
||||||
Long
Term Deferred Tax Asset
|
2,029,859
|
-
|
||||||
TOTAL
OTHER ASSETS
|
2,133,670
|
180,383
|
||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ |
3,259,384
|
$ |
1,006,532
|
||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY/(DEFICIT)
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Accounts
Payable
|
$ |
64,799
|
$ |
38,363
|
||||
Credit
Cards Payable
|
15,352
|
11,585
|
||||||
Accrued
Expenses
|
88,514
|
221,275
|
||||||
Bank
Line of Credit
|
7,916
|
42,916
|
||||||
Deferred
Income
|
35,333
|
-
|
||||||
Note
Payable, Other
|
40,107
|
13,000
|
||||||
Note
Payable, Related Party
|
50,481
|
200,481
|
||||||
Customer
Deposit
|
51,436
|
39,324
|
||||||
Derivative
Liability-Debenture
|
-
|
348,295
|
||||||
Capitalized
Leases, Current Portion
|
23,183
|
31,735
|
||||||
TOTAL
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
377,121
|
946,974
|
||||||
LONG
TERM LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Note
payable, Related Party
|
-
|
200,481
|
||||||
Note
payable, Other
|
74,216
|
154,429
|
||||||
Covertible
Debenture
|
-
|
895,000
|
||||||
Beneficial
Conversion Feature
|
-
|
(151,412 | ) | |||||
Capitalized
Leases
|
7,912
|
31,320
|
||||||
TOTAL LONG
TERM LIABILITIES
|
82,128
|
1,129,818
|
||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES
|
459,249
|
2,076,792
|
||||||
SHAREHOLDERS'
EQUITY/(DEFICIT)
|
||||||||
Common
Stock, $0.001 Par Value;
|
||||||||
495,000,000
Authorized Shares;
|
||||||||
340,579,815
and 227,910,128 Shares Issued and Outstanding ,
respectively
|
340,579
|
227,910
|
||||||
Additional
Paid In Capital
|
6,886,682
|
6,251,506
|
||||||
Accumulated
Deficit
|
(4,427,126 | ) | (7,349,195 | ) | ||||
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY/(DEFICIT)
|
2,800,135
|
(869,779 | ) | |||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY/(DEFICIT)
|
$ |
3,259,384
|
$ |
1,207,013
|
||||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements
-17-
WARP9,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|||||||
Years
Ended
|
||||||||
June
30, 2008
|
June
30, 2007
|
|||||||
REVENUE
|
$ |
2,349,665
|
$ |
2,737,009
|
||||
COST
OF SERVICES
|
143,635
|
519,485
|
||||||
GROSS
PROFIT
|
2,206,030
|
2,217,524
|
||||||
OPERATING
EXPENSES
|
||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
1,545,981
|
1,870,385
|
||||||
Research
and development
|
48,735
|
111,412
|
||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
141,059
|
194,046
|
||||||
TOTAL
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
1,735,775
|
2,175,843
|
||||||
INCOME
FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES)
|
470,255
|
41,681
|
||||||
OTHER
INCOME/(EXPENSE)
|
||||||||
Interest
Income
|
20,663
|
9,064
|
||||||
Other
Income
|
24,206
|
79,133
|
||||||
Gain
on sale of investment
|
498,750
|
-
|
||||||
Gain/(Loss)
on derative liability valuation
|
100,038
|
141,096
|
||||||
Stock
option expense
|
(28,905 | ) | (49,899 | ) | ||||
Interest
Expense
|
(228,446 | ) | (230,720 | ) | ||||
TOTAL
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
386,306
|
(51,326 | ) | |||||
INCOME/(LOSS)
FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE PROVISION FOR TAXES
|
856,561
|
(9,645 | ) | |||||
PROVISION
FOR INCOME (TAXES)/BENEFIT
|
||||||||
Income
taxes
|
(3,200 | ) | (3,888 | ) | ||||
Federal
tax benefit
|
1,803,489
|
-
|
||||||
State
tax benefit
|
265,219
|
-
|
||||||
PROVISION
FOR INCOME (TAXES)/ BENEFIT
|
2,065,508
|
(3,888 | ) | |||||
NET
INCOME/(LOSS)
|
2,922,069
|
(13,533 | ) | |||||
BASIC
AND DILUTED INCOME/(LOSS) PER SHARE
|
$ |
0.01
|
$ | (0.00 | ) | |||
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE
COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
|
||||||||
BASIC
AND DILUTED
|
273,771,640
|
210,045,258
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements
-18-
WARP9,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Additional
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Common
|
Paid-in
|
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Stock
|
Capital
|
Deficit
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance,
June 30, 2006
|
189,803,146
|
$ |
189,803
|
$ |
5,886,360
|
$ | (7,335,662 | ) | $ | (1,259,499 | ) | |||||||||
Issuance
of common stock in September 2006, note 7
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Convertible
debenture
|
10,696,641
|
10,697
|
84,303
|
-
|
95,000
|
|||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock in December 2006, note 7
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Convertible
debenture
|
16,286,745
|
16,287
|
73,713
|
-
|
90,000
|
|||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock in March 2007, note 7
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Convertible
debenture
|
11,123,596
|
11,124
|
48,876
|
-
|
60,000
|
|||||||||||||||
Derivative
liability
|
-
|
-
|
109,289
|
-
|
109,289
|
|||||||||||||||
Stock
compensation, net
|
-
|
-
|
49,899
|
-
|
49,899
|
|||||||||||||||
Stock
issuance cost
|
-
|
-
|
(934 | ) |
-
|
(934 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
Loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(13,533 | ) | (13,533 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance,
June 30, 2007
|
227,910,128
|
$ |
227,910
|
$ |
6,251,506
|
$ | (7,349,195 | ) | $ | (869,779 | ) | |||||||||
Issuance
of common stock in August 2007, note 7
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Convertible
debenture
|
11,009,174
|
11,009
|
108,991
|
-
|
120,000
|
|||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock in September 2007, note 7
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Convertible
debenture
|
6,363,636
|
6,364
|
63,636
|
-
|
70,000
|
|||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock in October 2007, note 7
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Convertible
debenture
|
11,235,955
|
11,236
|
88,764
|
-
|
100,000
|
|||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock in January 2008, note 7
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Convertible
debenture
|
11,842,105
|
11,842
|
33,158
|
-
|
45,000
|
|||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock in February 2008, note 7
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Convertible
debenture
|
13,043,478
|
13,043
|
39,131
|
-
|
52,174
|
|||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock in March 2008, note 7
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Convertible
debenture
|
13,750,000
|
13,750
|
24,750
|
-
|
38,500
|
|||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock in April 2008, note 7
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Convertible
debenture
|
29,579,185
|
29,579
|
33,721
|
-
|
63,300
|
|||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock in May 2008, note 7
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Convertible
debenture
|
15,846,154
|
15,846
|
4,754
|
-
|
20,600
|
|||||||||||||||
Derivative
liability
|
-
|
-
|
209,712
|
-
|
209,712
|
|||||||||||||||
Stock
option expense
|
-
|
-
|
28,905
|
-
|
28,905
|
|||||||||||||||
Stock
issuance cost
|
-
|
-
|
(346 | ) |
-
|
(346 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
income
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2,922,069
|
2,922,069
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance,
June 30, 2008
|
340,579,815
|
$ |
340,579
|
$ |
6,886,682
|
$ | (4,427,126 | ) | $ |
2,800,135
|
||||||||||
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements
-19-
WARP9,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years
Ended
|
||||||||
June
30, 2008
|
June
30, 2007
|
|||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Net
income/(loss)
|
$ |
2,922,069
|
$ | (13,533 | ) | |||
Adjustment
to reconcile net loss to net cash
|
||||||||
used
in operating activities
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
65,907
|
91,280
|
||||||
Gain
on sale of investment
|
(498,750 | ) |
-
|
|||||
Bad
debt expense
|
42,207
|
-
|
||||||
Conversion
feature recorded as interest expense
|
151,412
|
109,352
|
||||||
Amortization
of loan costs
|
75,151
|
102,766
|
||||||
Cost
of stock compensation recognized
|
28,905
|
49,899
|
||||||
Derivative
expense
|
(100,038 | ) | (141,096 | ) | ||||
(Increase)
Decrease in:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
(106,897 | ) | (65,160 | ) | ||||
Prepaid
and other assets
|
(8,600 | ) |
15,811
|
|||||
Deferred
tax benefit
|
(2,068,708 | ) |
-
|
|||||
Increase
(Decrease) in:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
30,202
|
21,300
|
||||||
Accrued
expenses
|
(132,761 | ) |
65,185
|
|||||
Deferred
Income
|
35,333
|
(61,333 | ) | |||||
Other
liabilities
|
12,112
|
(71,243 | ) | |||||
NET
CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
447,544
|
103,228
|
||||||
CASH
FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Sale
of investment
|
500,000
|
-
|
||||||
Purchase
of stock for investment
|
-
|
(1,250 | ) | |||||
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
(4,355 | ) | (3,702 | ) | ||||
NET
CASH PROVIDED/(USED) IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
495,645
|
(4,952 | ) | |||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Payment
on notes payable
|
(203,106 | ) | (49,500 | ) | ||||
Payments
on capitalized leases
|
(31,960 | ) | (45,755 | ) | ||||
Payments
on line of credit
|
(35,000 | ) |
42,574
|
|||||
Payoff
of convertible debenture
|
(423,969 | ) |
-
|
|||||
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock, net of cost
|
(346 | ) | (934 | ) | ||||
NET
CASH USED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
(694,381 | ) | (53,615 | ) | ||||
NET
INCREASE IN CASH
|
248,808
|
44,661
|
||||||
CASH,
BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
431,841
|
387,180
|
||||||
CASH,
END OF PERIOD
|
$ |
680,649
|
$ |
431,841
|
||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
||||||||
Interest
paid
|
$ |
209,957
|
$ |
21,878
|
||||
Taxes
paid
|
$ |
3,200
|
$ |
3,888
|
||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
SCHEDULE OF NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS
|
||||||||
During
the year ended June 30, 2008, the Company issued 112,669,687 shares
of
|
||||||||
of
common stock at a fair value of $509,574 for the convertible debenture.
During
|
||||||||
the
year ended June 30, 2007, the Company issued 38,107,082 shares
of
common
|
||||||||
stock
at a fair value of $245,000 for the convertible debenture. The
Company
|
||||||||
reclassified
accrued expenses of $237,891 to a note payable; also the
Company
|
||||||||
reclassified
an accounts payable in the amount of $154,429 to a note
payable.
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements
-20-
WARP
9,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30,
2008 AND
2007
1. ORGANIZATION AND LINE OF
BUSINESS
Organization
Warp
9,
Inc. (the "Company") is a Nevada corporation formerly known as Roaming
Messenger, Inc., formerly known as Latinocare Management Corporation ("LMC"). On
August 24, 2006, the Company’s board of directors and majority of shareholders
voted to change the name of the Company from Roaming Messenger, Inc. to Warp
9,
Inc. to reflect a new strategic plan of focusing primarily on the business
of
the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Warp 9, Inc. (a Delaware corporation).
The Company, based in Goleta, California, began operations October 1,
1999. The Company is a provider of fully hosted web based e-commerce
software products.
Line
of Business
Warp
9,
Inc. is a provider of e-commerce platforms and services for the catalog and
retail industry. Its suite of software platforms is designed to help online
retailers maximize the Internet channel by applying advanced technologies
for
online catalogs, e-mail marketing campaigns, and interactive visual
merchandising. Offered on a fully managed Software-as-a-Service model, Warp
9
products allow customers to focus on their core business, rather than technical
implementations.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
This
summary of significant accounting policies of Warp 9, Inc. is presented to
assist in understanding the Company’s financial statements. The financial
statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management, which is
responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies
conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of
America and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial
statements.
The
Consolidated Financial Statements include Warp 9, Inc. (the Company), and
its
majority-owned subsidiaries ("Warp 9, Inc., a Delaware corporation"). All
significant inter-company transactions are eliminated in
consolidation.
Reclassification
The
expenses for the year ended June 30, 2007 were reclassified to conform with
the
expenses for the year ended June 30, 2008.
Accounts
receivable
The
Company extends credit to its customers, who are located primarily in
California. Accounts receivable are customer obligations due under
normal trade terms. The Company performs continuing credit
evaluations of its customers’ financial condition. Management reviews
accounts receivable on a regular basis, based on contracted terms and how
recently payments have been received to determine if any such amounts will
potentially be uncollected. The Company includes any balances that
are determined to be uncollectible in its allowance for doubtful
accounts. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the
receivable is written off. The balance of the allowance account at
June 30, 2008 and 2007 are $67,301 and $25,094 respectively.
Use
of
Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that
affect the amounts reported in the accompanying financial
statements. Significant estimates made in preparing these financial
statements include the allowance for doubtful accounts, the estimate of useful
lives of property and equipment, the deferred tax valuation allowance, and
the
fair value of stock options and warrants. Actual results could differ from
those
estimates.
Cash
and Cash
Equivalents
The
Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity
of
three months or less to be cash equivalents.
-21-
WARP
9,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30,
2008 AND
2007
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES (Continued)
Revenue recognition
The
Company recognizes income when the service is provided or when product is
delivered. We present revenue, net of customer incentives. Most of
the income is generated from monthly fees from clients who subscribe to the
Company's fully hosted web based e-commerce products on terms averaging twelve
months. Unless terminated accordingly with prior written notice, the agreements
automatically renew for another term.
We
provide online marketing services that we purchase from third
parties. The gross revenue presented in our statement of operations
is in accordance with EITF No. 99-19.
We
also
offer professional services such as development services. The fees for
development services constitute a separate unit of accounting in accordance
with
EITF No. 00-21, and are recognized as the work is performed.
Upfront
fees for development services or other customer services are deferred until
certain implementation or contractual milestones have been
achieved. The deferred revenue as of June 30, 2008 and 2007 was
$35,333 and $0, respectively.
For
the
fiscal year ended, June 30, 2008, monthly fee from web products and associated
service fees account for 53% of the Company’s total revenues, professional
services account for 38% and the remaining 9% of total revenues are from
resale
of third party products and services.
For
the
fiscal year ended, June 30, 2007, monthly fee from web products and associated
service fees account for 40% of the Company’s total revenues, professional
services account for 36% and the remaining 24% of total revenues are from
resale
of third party products and services.
Return
policy
On
all
service offerings such as web based e-commerce products there are no
returns. Monthly fees are assessed and revenue is recognized at the
end of every month, after service has been provided. Some higher
paying customers may have service level agreements where we guarantee system
uptime such as 99.9% of the time per month. If we fall below the
agreed upon level of uptime, we shall credit one day of service fee for each
hour our system is down up to a maximum of one monthly fee. This
guarantee only covers downtime as a result of failure in the Company’s hardware,
software or gross negligence. Historically, the Company has not
had to issue any credits for such returns.
Cost
of Revenue
Cost
of
revenue includes the direct costs of operating the Company’s network, including
telecommunications charges and third party internet marketing
charges.
Research
and Development
Research
and development costs are expensed as incurred. Total research and
development costs were $48,735 and $111,412 for the years ended June 30,
2008
and 2007, respectively.
Advertising
Costs
The
Company expenses the cost of advertising and promotional materials when
incurred. Total advertising costs were $27,329 and $30,950 for the
years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Fair
value of financial instruments
The
Company's financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities are carried at cost,
which
approximates their fair value, due to the relatively short maturity of these
instruments. As of June 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company's capital
lease obligations and notes payable have stated borrowing rates that are
consistent with those currently available to the Company and, accordingly,
the
Company believes the carrying value of these debt instruments approximates
their
fair value.
-22-
WARP
9,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30,
2008 AND
2007
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(Continued)
Property
and Equipment
Property
and equipment are stated at cost, and are depreciated or amortized
using the
straight-line method over the following estimated useful
lives:
Furniture,
fixtures & equipment
|
7
Years
|
|
Computer
equipment
|
5
Years
|
|
Commerce
server
|
5
Years
|
|
Computer
software
|
3
-
5 Years
|
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
Length
of the lease
|
Depreciation
expenses are $141,059 and $194,046 for the years ended June 30, 2008 and
2007, respectively.
Property
and equipment assets leased under capitalized leases with an original cost
of
$218,179 at June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Amortization of
assets under capitalized leases is included in depreciation and amortization
expense. During the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, additions to
fixed assets through capitalized leases totaled $0, respectively.
Concentrations
of Business and Credit Risk
The
Company operates in a single industry segment. The Company markets
its services to companies and individuals in many industries and geographic
locations. The Company’s operations are subject to rapid
technological advancement and intense competition in the telecommunications
industry.
Accounts
receivable represent financial instruments with potential credit
risk. The Company typically offers its customers credit
terms. The Company makes periodic evaluations of the credit
worthiness of its enterprise customers and other than obtaining deposits
pursuant to its policies, it generally does not require
collateral. In the event of nonpayment, the Company has the ability
to terminate services.
Stock-Based
Compensation
As
of
June 30, 2006, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards No. 123
(revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (FAS) No. 123R, that addresses the
accounting for share-based payment transactions in which an enterprise receives
employee services in exchange for either equity instruments of the enterprise
or
liabilities that are based on the fair value of the enterprise’s equity
instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments.
The statement eliminates the ability to account for share-based compensation
transactions, as we formerly did, using the intrinsic value method as prescribed
by Accounting Principles Board, or APB, Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees,” and generally requires that such transactions be accounted
for using a fair-value-based method and recognized as expenses in our statement
of operations. The adoption of (FAS) No. 123R by the Company had
no material impact on the statement of operations.
Stock-based
compensation expense recognized during the period is based on the value of
the
portion of stock-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest.
Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statement
of
operations during the year ended June 30, 2008, included compensation expense
for the stock-based payment awards granted prior to, but not yet vested,
as of
June 30, 2008 based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance
with
the pro forma provisions of FAS 148, and compensation expense for the
stock-based payment awards granted subsequent to June 30, 2006, based on
the
grant date fair value estimated in accordance with FAS 123R. As stock-based
compensation expense recognized in the statement of income for the
year ended June 30, 2008 is based on awards ultimately expected to
vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. FAS 123R requires
forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary,
in
subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. In
the pro
forma information
required under FAS 148 for the periods prior to the year ended June 30, 2008,
we
accounted for forfeitures as they occurred. The stock-based compensation
expense
recognized in the consolidated
statement of operations during the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was
$28,905 and $49,899, respectively.
-23-
WARP
9,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30,
2008 AND 2007
2. SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)
Net
Loss Per Share
Net
loss
per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common
shares
outstanding during the periods presented. Options to purchase shares
of the Company’s stock under its stock option plan and warrants may have a
dilutive effect on the Company’s earnings per share in the future but are not
included in the calculation for 2008 and 2007 because they have an anti-dilutive
effect in these periods.
Income
Taxes
The
Company uses the liability method of accounting for income
taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the
future tax consequences attributable to financial statements carrying amounts
of
existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating
loss and tax credit carry-forwards. The measurement of deferred tax
assets and liabilities is based on provisions of applicable tax
law. The measurement of deferred tax assets is reduced, if necessary,
by a valuation allowance based on the amount of tax benefits that, based
on
available evidence, is not expected to be realized.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In
June
2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of SFAS 109”,
(“FIN
48”).
FIN 48 provides interpretive guidance for the financial statement recognition
and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax
return.
FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The
Company does not anticipate adoption of this standard will have a material
impact on its financial statements.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements,
(“SFAS
157”).
SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value
in
generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair
value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued
for
fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within
those fiscal years. The Company does not anticipate adoption of this standard
will have a material impact on its financial statements.
3. OBLIGATIONS
UNDER CAPITALIZED LEASES
Year
Ended
|
|||||
Lessor
|
Description
|
6/30/2008
|
|||
SBBT
|
Payble
in monthly installments of $488
|
||||
interest
at 17%, matures in June, 2009
|
$ |
9,147
|
|||
SBBT
|
Payble
in monthly installments of $281
|
||||
interest
at 16%, matures in November, 2009
|
4,257
|
||||
SBBT
|
Payble
in monthly installments of $726
|
||||
interest
at 17%, matures in August, 2009
|
9,684
|
||||
GE
|
Payble
in monthly installments of $551
|
||||
interest
at 17%, matures in September, 2008
|
5,857
|
||||
GE
|
Payble
in monthly installments of $1206
|
||||
interest
at 17%, matures in September, 2008
|
2,150
|
||||
31,095
|
|||||
Less
current portion
|
23,183
|
||||
Long-term
portion of obligations under
|
|||||
captalized
leases
|
$ |
7,912
|
-24-
WARP
9,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30,
2008 AND 2007
3. OBLIGATIONS
UNDER CAPITALIZED LEASES (continued)
Minimum
annual lease payments under
capitalized lease obligations at June 30, 2008 are as follows:
Fiscal
Year
|
||||
2009
|
24,423
|
|||
2010
|
8,718
|
|||
33,141
|
||||
Less
amount representing Interest
|
2,046
|
|||
31,095
|
||||
Less
current portion
|
23,183
|
|||
Long
term portion of capitalized lease obligations
|
$ |
7,912
|
4. NOTES
PAYABLE
The
Company had a note payable to a vendor in the amount of $50,000, bearing
interest at 10%, with monthly interest payments only. The maturity
date, which was originally October 15, 2001, was subsequently amended to
March
15, 2002. The note was not paid off on its amended maturity date and was
in
default until paid in full on June 5, 2008.
On
October 16, 2006, the Company reclassified $237,981 of accrued salaries to
a
promissory demand note, due no later than October 31, 2008. Interest
is paid annually at a rate of 5% per annum on the unpaid balance. At June
30,
2008 and 2007, the outstanding principal balance was $50,481 and $200,481,
respectively.
At
June
30, 2007, the Company reclassified an accounts payable account to a vendor
in
the amount of $154,429 to a note payable. The monthly payment on the note
is
$3,342 per month and bears no interest. At June 30, 2008 and 2007, the
outstanding principal balance was $114,323 and $154,429 respectively. The
following is a schedule of payments due for the next five years.
Year
Ending
June
30,
|
|
|||
2009
|
$ |
40,107
|
||
2010
|
$ |
40,107
|
||
2011
|
$ | 34,115 | ||
2012-2013
|
$ | - |
5. DEFERRED
TAX BENEFIT
Deferred
taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets are
recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax
credit carry-forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable
temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between
the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred
tax
assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management,
it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets
will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for
the
effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
-25-
WARP
9,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30,
2008 AND 2007
5. DEFERRED
TAX BENEFIT (continued)
The
provision (benefit) for income taxes for the year ended June 30, 2008 and
2007
consist of the following:
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Federal:
|
||||||||
Current
|
$ |
-
|
$ |
-
|
||||
Deferred
|
1,803,489
|
-
|
||||||
State:
|
||||||||
Current
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Deferred
|
265,219
|
-
|
||||||
$ |
2,068,708
|
$ |
-
|
Net
deferred tax assets consist of the following components as of June 30, 2008
and
2007:
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Deferred
Tax Assets:
|
||||||||
NOL
Carryforward
|
$ |
1,924,273
|
$ |
2,305,600
|
||||
Depreciation
|
10,735
|
2,300
|
||||||
R&D
Carryforward
|
94,851
|
94,900
|
||||||
Accrued
Vacation Payable
|
12,602
|
12,500
|
||||||
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
|
26,247
|
-
|
||||||
Deferred
Tax Liabilities:
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Valuation
Allowance
|
-
|
(2,415,300 | ) | |||||
Net
Deferred Tax Asset
|
$ |
2,068,708
|
$ |
-
|
The
income tax provision differs from the amount of income tax determined by
applying the U.S. federal and state income tax rate of 39% to pretax income
from
continuing operations for the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 due to the
following:
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Book
Income
|
$ |
332,810
|
$ | (5,412 | ) | |||
State
Income Taxes
|
3,200
|
3,888
|
||||||
Nondeductible
Stock Compensation
|
11,273
|
7,200
|
||||||
Other
|
1,598
|
500
|
||||||
Related
Party Accruals
|
26,248
|
-
|
||||||
Allowance
for Bad Debt
|
391
|
-
|
||||||
Depreciation
|
8,516
|
-
|
||||||
Beneficial
Conversion Feature
|
59,051
|
-
|
||||||
Derative
Liability Interest
|
(39,015 | ) |
-
|
|||||
NOL
Carryover
|
(400,872 | ) |
-
|
|||||
Valuation
Allowance
|
-
|
(2,288 | ) | |||||
Income
Tax Expense
|
$ |
3,200
|
$ |
3,888
|
-26-
WARP
9,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30,
2008 AND 2007
6. INCOME
TAXES
The
Company files income tax returns in the U.S. Federal jurisdiction, and
the state
of California. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to
U.S.
federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities
for years before 2004.
The
Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting
for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes, on July 1, 2007. The Company’s policy is
to recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest
expense and penalties in operating expenses. During the period ended June
30,
2008, the Company did not recognize interest and penalties.
7. CAPITAL
STOCK
At
June
30, 2008, the Company’s authorized stock consisted of 495,000,000 shares of
common stock, par value $0.001 per share. The Company is also
authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value
of
$0.001 per share. The rights, preferences and privileges of the
holders of the preferred stock will be determined by the Board of Directors
prior to issuance of such shares. During the year ended June 30,
2008, the Company issued 112,669,687 shares of common stock ranging from
$0.0013
to $0.0110 per share for the conversion of the debenture with a value of
$509,575; During the year ended, June 30, 2007, the Company issued 38,106,982
shares of common stock ranging from $0.0046 to $0.0092 per share for the
conversion of the debenture with a value of $245,000.
8. STOCK
OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
On
July
10, 2003, the Company adopted the Warp 9, Inc. Stock Option Plan for Directors,
Executive Officers, and Employees of and Key Consultants to the
Company. This Plan, may issue 25,000,000 shares of common
stock. Options granted under the Plan could be either Incentive
Options or Nonqualified Options, and are administered by the Company’s Board of
Directors. Each options may be exercisable in full or in installment
and at such time as designated by the Board. Notwithstanding any
other provision of the Plan or of any Option agreement, each option are
to
expire on the date specified in the Option agreement, which date are to
be no
later than the tenth anniversary of the date on which the Option was granted
(fifth anniversary in the case of an Incentive Option granted to a
greater-than-10% stockholder). The purchase price per share of the
Common Stock under each Incentive Option are to be no less than the Fair
Market
Value of the Common Stock on the date the option was granted (110% of the
Fair
Market Value in the case of a greater-than-10% stockholder). The purchase
price
per share of the Common Stock under each Nonqualified Option were to be
specified by the Board at the time the Option was granted, and could be
less
than, equal to or greater than the Fair Market Value of the shares of Common
Stock on the date such Nonqualified Option was granted, but were to be
no less
than the par value of shares of Common Stock. The plan provided
specific language as to the termination of options granted
hereunder.
The
Company adopted FAS 123R using the modified prospective method which requires
the application of the accounting standard as of June 30, 2006. Our financial
statements as of and for the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 reflect
the
impact of adopting FAS 123R. In accordance with the modified prospective
method,
the financial statements for prior periods have not been restated to reflect,
and do not include, the impact of FAS 123R. The Company also used the
historical industry index to calculate volatility, since the Company’s stock
history did not represent the expected future volatility of the Company’s common
stock. The fair value of options granted was determined using the Black
Schole
method with the following assumptions:
Year
Ended
|
Year
Ended
|
|
6/30/2008
|
6/30/2007
|
|
Risk
free interest rate
|
3.2%
- 5.07%
|
3.2%
- 5.07%
|
Stock
volatility factor
|
0.31
-0.53
|
0.31
-0.53
|
Weighted
average expected option life
|
4
years
|
4
years
|
Expected
dividend yield
|
none
|
none
|
-27-
WARP
9,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30,
2008 AND 2007
8. STOCK
OPTIONS AND WARRANTS (Continued)
A
summary of the Company’s stock option
activity and related information follows:
Year
ended
June
30, 2008
|
Year
ended
June
30, 2007
|
|||||||||||||||
Weighted
|
Weighted
|
|||||||||||||||
average
|
average
|
|||||||||||||||
exercise
|
exercise
|
|||||||||||||||
Options
|
price
|
Options
|
price
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
-beginning of year
|
15,725,002
|
$ |
0.05
|
5,209,994
|
$ |
0.11
|
||||||||||
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
15,806,500
|
0.01
|
||||||||||||
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Forfeited
|
1,375,002
|
0.04
|
5,291,492
|
0.09
|
||||||||||||
Outstanding
- end of year
|
14,350,000
|
$ |
0.02
|
15,725,002
|
$ |
0.05
|
||||||||||
Exercisable
at the end of year
|
8,430,309
|
$ |
0.01
|
3,299,198
|
$ |
0.02
|
||||||||||
Weighted
average fair value of
|
||||||||||||||||
options
granted during the year
|
$ |
-
|
$ |
0.01
|
The
Black
Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the
fair
value of traded options, which do not have vesting restrictions and are
fully
transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input
of highly
subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility.
Because
the Company’s employee stock options have characteristics significantly
different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective
input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s
opinion, the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single
measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.
The
weighted average remaining contractual life of options outstanding issued
under
the plan as of June
30,
2008 was as follows:
Weighted
|
||||||||||
Average
|
||||||||||
Number
of
|
remaining
|
|||||||||
Exercise
|
options
|
contractual
|
||||||||
prices
|
outstanding
|
life
(years)
|
||||||||
$ |
0.07
|
100,000
|
1.50
|
|||||||
$ |
0.10
|
100,000
|
1.28
|
|||||||
$ |
0.13
|
650,000
|
1.07
|
|||||||
$ |
0.01
|
12,850,000
|
2.30
|
|||||||
$ |
0.03
|
150,000
|
2.83
|
|||||||
$ |
0.02
|
500,000
|
2.97
|
|||||||
14,350,000
|
||||||||||
-28-
WARP
9,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30,
2008 AND 2007
8. STOCK
OPTIONS AND WARRANTS (Continued)
Stock
Warrants
During
the year ended June 30, 2008, the Company issued no warrants for services.
A
summary of the Company’s warrant activity and related information
follows:
Year
End
|
Year
End
|
|||||||||||||||
June
30, 2008
|
June
30, 2007
|
|||||||||||||||
Weighted
|
Weighted
|
|||||||||||||||
average
|
average
|
|||||||||||||||
exercise
|
exercise
|
|||||||||||||||
Options
|
price
|
Options
|
price
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
-beginning of year
|
10,499,500
|
$ |
0.12
|
838,500
|
$ |
0.12
|
||||||||||
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
10,434,500
|
0.10
|
||||||||||||
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Forfeited
|
984,500
|
0.11
|
773,500
|
0.12
|
||||||||||||
Outstanding
- end of year
|
9,515,000
|
$ |
0.11
|
10,499,500
|
$ |
0.12
|
9. LINE
OF CREDIT
On
August
11, 2005, the Company was approved for a $100,000 revolving line
of credit from
Bank of America at an interest of prime plus 4 percentage
points. This line of credit is not secured by assets of the
Company. The effective interest rate of the line of credit at June
30, 2008 was 9%. As of June 30, 2008 and 2007, the balance was $7,916
and $42,916, respectively.
10. CONVERTIBLE
DEBENTURES
On
December 28, 2005, we consummated a securities purchase agreement
with Cornell
Capital Partners L.P. providing for the sale by us to Cornell of
our 10% secured
convertible debentures in the aggregate principal amount of $1,200,000
of which
the first installment of $400,000 was advanced immediately. The net
amount of the first installment received by the Company was $295,500
after
paying total fees of $92,500 which included
legal, structuring, due diligence, commitment fees, and prior
liability of $12,000. An interest expense of $100,000, representing
the value of the conversion feature in accordance to EITF 00-27 was
recorded for
the first installment. Under EITF 00-27, the Company
records a beneficial conversion cost associated with the convertibility
feature
of the security that equals the value of any discount to market available
at the
time of conversion. This beneficial conversion cost is recorded at
the time the
convertible security is first issued and is amortized over the stated
terms.
Holders of
the
debentures may convert at any time amounts outstanding under the
debentures into shares of our common stock at a conversion
price per share equal to the lesser of (i) $0.15 or (ii) 80%
of the lowest volume weighted average price of our common stock during the five
trading days immediately preceding the conversion date
as quoted by Bloomberg, LP. Cornell has agreed
not to short any of the shares of Common Stock. EITF 00-19 is
applicable to debentures issued by the Company in instances where
the number of
shares into which a debenture can be converted is not fixed. For
example, when a
debenture converts at a discount to market based on the stock price
on the date
of conversion. In such instances, EITF 00-19 requires that the embedded
conversion option of the convertible debentures be bifurcated from
the host
contract and recorded at their fair value. In accounting for derivatives
under
EITF 00-19, the Company records a liability representing the estimated
present
value of the conversion feature considering the historic volatility
of the
Company’s stock, and a discount representing the imputed interest associated
with the beneficial conversion feature. The discount is then amortized
over the
life of the debentures and the derivative liability
is adjusted periodically according to stock price fluctuations. At
the time of
conversion, any remaining derivative liability is charged to additional
paid-in
capital. For purpose of determining derivative liability, the Company
uses Black Scholes modeling for computing historic
volatility.
-29-
WARP
9,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30,
2008 AND 2007
10. CONVERTIBLE
DEBENTURES (continued)
We have the
right to redeem a portion or all
amounts outstanding under the debenture prior to the maturity date at
a 20% redemption premium provided that the closing bid price of our
common stock
is less than $0.15. In addition, in the event of a
redemption, we are required to issue to Cornell 50,000 shares of
common stock
for each $100,000 redeemed.
We
also
issued to Cornell five-year warrants to purchase 1,500,000, 4,000,000
and
4,000,000 shares of Common Stock at $0.08, $0.10 and $0.12 per share,
respectively.
The
second installment of $350,000 ($295,000 net of fees) was advanced
on January
27, 2006. An interest expense of $87,500 was incurred, representing
the value of
the conversion feature in accordance to EITF 00-27.
The
last
installment of $450,000 ($395,000 net of fees) was advanced on May
9, 2006,
after the registration statement was declared effective by the Securities
and
Exchange Commission. An interest expense of $112,500, representing
the value of
the conversion feature in accordance to EITF 00-27, was incurred
at the receipt
of this first installment.
On
June
10, 2008, the Company settled the outstanding principal and interest
on the
convertible debentures through a lump sum payment of $620,846 consisting
of
$385,426 in principal, $196,878 in interest and $38,542 in redemption
penalty.
11. CONCENTRATIONS
For
the
year ended June 30, 2008, the Company had one customer who represented
approximately 15% of total revenue. For the year ended June 30, 2007,
the Company had two customers who represented approximately 32% of
total
revenue.
Accounts
receivable from two customers represented approximately 38% of total
accounts
receivable at June 30, 2008. Accounts receivable from two customers
represented approximately 32% of total accounts receivable at June
30,
2007.
The
Company has a concentration of credit risk for cash by maintaining
deposits with
banks, which may at a time exceed insured amounts. At June 30, 2008,
the Company had $510,995 exceeding the amount insured by the U.S.
Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).
12. RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
On
January 16, 2007, Mr. Harinder Dhillon, the Company’s President exercised his
option to purchase 8,650,000 of the Company’s common stock. The options were
personal holdings which were granted by Mr. Jon Lei, a 10% or larger
shareholder
of the Company.
13. COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating
Leases
The
following is a schedule, by years, of future minimum rental payments
required
under operating leases for the facilities and equipment. The lease of
the facilities expires in 2010. The following is a schedule of
minimum lease payments for the next two years.
Years
Ending
June
30,
|
Rent
Payment
|
|||
2009
|
$ |
108,000
|
||
2010
|
$ |
109,000
|
||
-30-
WARP
9,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE
30,
2008 AND 2007
13. COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES (continued)
Total
lease expense for the years ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $149,679
and
$163,211 respectively. The Company is also required to pay its pro
rata share of taxes, building maintenance costs, and insurance in
according to
the lease agreement.
Restricted
Cash
The
Company has restricted cash in the amount of $93,000. This restricted
cash is used to collateralize a standby letter of credit in favor
of the
landlord as part of the Company’s lease agreement for its current office space
at 50 Castilian Dr. Santa Barbara, CA 93117. This cash amount is
restricted until the lease expires on June 30, 2010 or when negotiated
down.
Legal
Matters
The
Company may be involved in legal actions and claims arising in the
ordinary
course of business, from time to time, none of which at the time
are considered
to be material to the Company’s business or financial
condition.
-31-
ITEM
9. CHANGES IN AN DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM
9A(T). CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure
controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed
to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by Warp 9 is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the
rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The
Company’s Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and Acting Chief Financial Officer
are responsible for establishing and maintaining controls and procedures for
the
Company.
Management
has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and
procedures as of June 30, 2008 (under the supervision and with the participation
of the Company’s Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and Acting Chief Financial
Officer) pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended. As part of such evaluation, management considered the
matters discussed below relating to internal control over financial
reporting. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chairman,
Chief Executive Officer, and Acting Chief Financial Officer have concluded
that
the disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
The
term
“internal control over financial reporting” is defined as a process designed by,
or under the supervision of, the registrant’s principal executive and principal
financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by
the
registrant’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and
procedures that:
|
·
|
pertain
to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately
and
fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of
the
registrant;
|
|
·
|
provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary
to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
registrant are being made only in accordance with authorizations
of
management and directors of the registrant;
and
|
|
·
|
provide
reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition,
use
or disposition of the registrant’s assets that could have a material
effect on the financial
statements.
|
-32-
Management’s
Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The
Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting, (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). The Company’s internal control
over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes of accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States. Because of its inherent limitations,
internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be
effective can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control
objectives. Furthermore, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to
future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
due
to change in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.
Under
the
supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer, and Acting Chief Financial Officer, the Company conducted
an
evaluation of the effectiveness of its control over financial reporting as
of
June 30, 2008. In making this assessment, management used the
criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO) in internal control-integrated framework. Based on
this evaluation, the Company’s Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and Acting
Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the disclosure controls and
procedures are effective.
Auditor’s
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
This
annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered
public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered
public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report
in this annual report.
Changes
in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
There
have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the Company’s fiscal year that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting. Prior to the fourth quarter, Warp 9 completed
procedures to achieve Sarbanes-Oxley 404 compliance, which were tested during
and since the fourth quarter.
Inherent
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
The
Company’s management does not expect that its disclosure controls or its
internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all error
and
all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and
operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control
system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the
fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must
be
considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent
limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide
absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur
or
that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company
have
been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that
judgments in decision making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because
of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual
acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or management override
of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in
part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there
can
be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals
under
all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls
effectiveness
to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the
degree of compliance with policies or procedures.
-33-
ITEM
9B. OTHER INFORMATION
On
June
10, 2008, Warp 9 prepaid the remaining balance due under the 2005 Cornell Note
with a payment of $620,846. Cornell Capital Partners recorded the
loan as paid in full and the original transaction documents for the loan were
cancelled.
On
June
10, 2008, Warp 9 sold five million (5,000,000) shares of the common stock of
Carbon Sciences, Inc. owned by Warp 9 to Cumorah Capital, Inc. for a purchase
price of $500,000.
The
following table lists the executive officers and directors of the Company as
of
September 30, 2008:
Name | Age | Position |
|
Harinder
Dhillon
|
35
|
Chief
Executive Officer, President and
Director
|
|
Louie
Ucciferri
|
47
|
Chairman
of the Board of Directors, Corporate Secretary, Acting Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
Kin
Ng
|
39
|
Director
|
Harinder
Dhillon has been the Company’s Chief Executive Officer since October 2006 and
the President of the Company since July 1, 2005. From October 2001 to
October 2006, Mr. Dhillon was the Vice President of Operations of the
Company. Mr. Dhillon joined us in July 2000. Prior to
joining the Company, from 1993 to1998, Mr. Dhillon served as the Chief
Information Officer of Informax Data Systems, an enterprise systems integrator
headquartered in Southern California. Thereafter, during 1999 until
he joined the Company, he worked as an independent technology
consultant. He has designed, managed, and led the development and
deployment of enterprise Internet, Intranet and integration projects for Fortune
500 companies and various government agencies. Mr. Dhillon received a Bachelor
degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of California
at Santa Barbara in 1996.
Louie
Ucciferri has been the Company’s Chairman of the Board, Corporate Secretary, and
Acting Chief Financial Office since October 15, 2006 and has been a director
of
the Company since 2003. He is also the Chief Executive Officer of
Regent Capital Group, a FINRA registered broker dealer dedicated to real estate
investments. From 1995 to 2004, Mr. Ucciferri served as the President
of Westlake Financial Architects, a financial advisory firm he founded in 1995
to provide financial and investment advisory services to early stage companies.
Since November 1998, he has also served as President of Camden Financial
Services, a FINRA registered broker dealer. Mr. Ucciferri received
Bachelors degrees in Economics and Sociology from Stanford University in
1983.
Mr.
Kin
Ng has been an independent director of the Company since October
2006. Mr. Ng has been a real estate broker and mortgage loan broker
at Signal Financial Solutions since 2000. He specializes in real
estate sales, purchase, lease and management. Prior to that, he had a
career in the airline industry. From 1998 to 2000, he was the Airport
Operations Supervisor for China Southern Airlines, prior to which he held
various positions for Delta Airlines and American Trans Air. Mr. Ng
received a Bachelor of Science degree in 1993 from the School of Hospitality
Management at California State Polytechnic University at
Pomona.
-34-
Under
the Nevada General Corporation
Law and the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, as amended, the Company’s
directors will have no personal liability to the Company or its stockholders
for
monetary damages incurred as the result of the breach or alleged breach by
a
director of his “duty of care”. This provision does not apply to the directors’
(i) acts or omissions that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing and
culpable violation of law, (ii) acts or omissions that a director believes
to be
contrary to the best interests of the corporation or its shareholders or that
involve the absence of good faith on the part of the director, (iii) approval
of
any transaction from which a director derives an improper personal benefit,
(iv)
acts or omissions that show a reckless disregard for the director’s duty to the
corporation or its shareholders in circumstances in which the director was
aware, or should have been aware, in the ordinary course of performing a
director’s duties, of a risk of serious injury to the corporation or its
shareholders, (v) acts or omissions that constituted an unexcused pattern of
inattention that amounts to an abdication of the director’s duty to the
corporation or its shareholders, or (vi) approval of an unlawful dividend,
distribution, stock repurchase or redemption. This provision would generally
absolve directors of personal liability for negligence in the performance of
duties, including gross negligence.
Insofar
as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be
permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling the Company pursuant
to
the foregoing provisions, the Company has been informed that in the opinion
of
the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public
policy as expressed in the Act and is therefore unenforceable.
Board
Committees
The
Board
of Directors has not had an Audit Committee since February 2006 when Tom
Djokovich, the sole member of the Audit Committee, resigned from the Company’s
Board of Directors for personal reasons. Since then, the Company has
not reappointed an Audit Committee.
Auditor
Independence
HJ
Associates & Consultants, LLP (“HJ”) has been the Company’s principal
auditing accountant firm since August 2006. HJ provided other
non-audit services to the Company. The Company's Board of Directors has
considered whether the provisions of non-audit services are compatible with
maintaining HJ independence.
Report
of the Audit Committee
In
February 2006, the sole member of the Company’s Audit Committee resigned from
the Board of Directors for personal reasons. The Company has not
reformed the Audit Committee since that time. Accordingly the Company
has not received any reports from an Audit Committee during the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2008. The Company’s full board of directors is
presently performing the functions of an Audit Committee until a new Audit
Committee is formed in the future.
Code
of Conduct
The
Company has adopted a Code of Conduct that applies to all of its directors,
officers and employees. Any waiver of the provisions of the Code of
Conduct for executive officers and directors may be made only by the Audit
Committee when formed or the full Board of Directors and, in the case of a
waiver for members of the Audit Committee, by the Board of
Directors. Any such waivers will be promptly disclosed to the
Company’s shareholders.
Compliance
with Section 16(A) of Exchange Act
Section
16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s officers and directors, and
certain persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of the Company’s
equity securities (collectively, “Reporting Persons”), to file reports of
ownership and changes in ownership (“Section 16 Reports”) with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Reporting Persons are required
by the SEC to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16 Reports they
file.
-35-
Based
solely on its review of the copies of such Section 16 Reports received by it,
or
written representations received from certain Reporting Persons, all Section
16(a) filing requirements applicable to the Company’s Reporting Persons during
and with respect to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008 have been complied
with
on a timely basis.
Executive
Officer Compensation
The
following summary compensation table sets forth certain information concerning
compensation paid to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its most highly
paid executive officers (the "Named Executive Officers") whose total annual
salary and bonus for services rendered in all capacities for the year ended
June
30, 2008 was $100,000 or more.
Summary
Compensation Table
Name
and Principal Position
|
Fiscal
Year
|
Salary
|
Bonus
|
Option
Awards
|
All
Other
Compensation
|
Total
|
Harinder
Dhillon (1)
Chief
Executive Officer, President, and director
|
2008
2007
|
$200,000
$200,000
|
$76,969
$63,947
|
-0-
$80,800(3)
|
-0-
-
0
-
|
$276,969
$344,747
|
Louie
Ucciferri (2)
|
2008
|
$22,500
|
-0-
|
-0-
|
-
0
-
|
$22,500
|
Acting
Chief Financial Officer,
|
2007
|
$22,500
|
-0-
|
$25,000(4)
|
-
0
-
|
$47,750
|
Corporate
Secretary, and Chairman
|
(1)
|
Mr.
Dhillon has a compensation and performance bonus plan pursuant to
which he
may earn bonuses based on the annual profitability of Warp
9. The compensation and performance bonus plan for Mr. Dhillon,
which has been in effect since March 2006, currently provides as
follows:
Mr. Dhillon has a base salary of $200,000 per year, a monthly bonus
of 10%
of the Company’s “operating profit” for that month, defined as gross
profit minus selling, general and administrative costs, payable on
a
monthly basis provided that the Company’s operating profit for that month
is at least $50,000, and provided further, that the maximum aggregate
monthly bonuses during any calendar year do not exceed $100,000,
plus Mr.
Dhillon is entitled to an additional $50,000 annual bonus for any
calendar
year in which the Company’s EBITDA exceeds $500,000. Mr.
Dhillon waived his $50,000 EBITDA bonus for the calendar year ending
December 31, 2007, which the Company otherwise would have paid. Mr.
Dhillon was awarded a special $50,000 bonus on September 24, 2008
which is
in addition to his existing compensation plan. The Company's Board
of Directors approved the special bonus and also reaffirmed Mr. Dhillon's
existing compensation plan. Mr. Dhillon has an “at will” employment
agreement with the company. Mr. Dhillon did not receive any
compensation for his services as a director of the
Company.
|
(2)
|
Mr.
Ucciferri receives $2,500 per month in consideration for his services
as
an executive officer of the Company. Mr. Ucciferri did not
receive any compensation for his services as the Chairman of the
Board of
Directors of the Company.
|
(3)
|
On
October 16, 2006, Mr. Dhillon received stock options to purchase
8,000,000
shares of common stock, at an exercise price of $0.01 per share,
in
consideration for his services to the Company. These stock
options vest in equal monthly installments over a forty-eight month
period
and expire on October 16, 2010.
|
(4)
|
On
October 16, 2006, Mr. Ucciferri received stock options to purchase
2,500,000 shares of common stock, at an exercise price of $0.01 per
share,
in consideration for his services to the Company. These stock
options vested in equal monthly installments over a twelve month
period
and expire on October 16, 2010.
|
Outstanding
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The
following table sets forth information with respect to unexercised stock
options, stock that has not vested, and equity incentive plan awards held by
the
Company's executive officers at June 30, 2008.
-36-
Option
Awards
Name
|
Number
of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options
Exercisable
|
Number
of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned
Options
|
Option
Exercise Price
|
Option
Expiration Date
|
Harinder
Dhillon
|
3,408,219
(1)
|
4,591,781
|
$0.01
|
October
16, 2010
|
Chief
Executive Officer, President
|
650,000
|
-
0
-
|
$0.13
|
July
26, 2009
|
Louie
Ucciferri
|
2,500,000(3)
|
-
0
-
|
$0.01
|
October
16, 2010
|
Acting
Chief Financial Officer
and Corporate Secretary
|
(1)
|
On
October 16, 2006, Mr. Dhillon received stock options to purchase
8,000,000
shares of common stock, at an exercise price of $0.01 per share,
in
consideration for his services to the Company. These stock
options vest in equal monthly installments over a forty-eight month
period.
|
(2)
|
On
August 1, 2005, Mr. Dhillon received stock options to purchase 650,000
shares of common stock, at an exercise price of $0.13 per share,
in
consideration for his services to the Company. These stock
options are fully vested.
|
(3)
|
On
October 16, 2006, Mr. Ucciferri received stock options to purchase
2,500,000 shares of common stock, at an exercise price of $0.01 per
share,
in consideration for his services to the Company. These stock
options vested in equal monthly installments over a twelve month
period
and are fully vested.
|
Option
Exercises and Stock Vested
None
of
the Company’s executive officers exercised any stock options or acquired stock
through vesting of an equity award during the fiscal year ended June 30,
2008.
Director
Compensation
The
Company’s independent director did not receive any compensation for his services
rendered to the Company during the fiscal year ended June 30,
2008. The compensation paid to the Company’s non-independent
directors is reflected in the above table entitled Summary Compensation
Table.
Employment
Agreements
The
Company has not entered into any employment agreements with its executive
officers to date. The Company may enter into employment agreements with them
in
the future.
Stock
Option Plan
On
July
10, 2003, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted the 2003 Stock Option
Plan for Directors, Executive Officers, Employees and Key Consultants of the
Company (the “2003 Plan”). The 2003 Plan was ratified by the
shareholders of the Company by written consent effective August 25,
2003. The 2003 Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 25,000,000
shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the grant and exercise of up to
25,000,000 stock options. To date, 14,350,000 options to purchase
14,350,000 shares of common stock at a volume weighted average price of $0.02
per share granted under the 2003 Plan are outstanding. To date, 2,775,000
options have been exercised.
-37-
The
following table sets forth the names of our executive officers and directors
and
all persons known by us to beneficially own 5% or more of the issued and
outstanding common stock of Warp 9 at September 12, 2008. Beneficial
ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. In computing the number of shares beneficially
owned by a person and the percentage of ownership of that person, shares of
common stock subject to options held by that person that are currently
exercisable or become exercisable within 60 days of September 12, 2008 are
deemed outstanding even if they have not actually been
exercised. Those shares, however, are not deemed outstanding for the
purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. The
percentage ownership of each beneficial owner is based on 340,579,815
outstanding shares of common stock. Except as otherwise listed below,
the address of each person is c/o Warp 9, Inc., 50 Castilian Dr. Suite 101,
Santa Barbara, California 93117. Except as indicated, each person
listed below has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares
set
forth opposite such person’s name.
Name,
Title and Address
|
Number
of Shares Beneficially Owned (1)
|
Percentage
Ownership
|
Harinder
Dhillon (2)
|
||
Chief
Executive Officer,
|
||
President
of Warp 9 Inc.
|
16,288,425
|
4.56%
|
Louie
Ucciferri (3)
|
||
Chairman,
Acting Chief Financial Officer, Corporate Secretary
|
5,500,000
|
1.59%
|
All
current Executive Officers as a Group
|
21,788,425
|
6.01%
|
Kin
Ng (4)
|
||
Director
|
1,050,000
|
*
|
5948
Temple City Blvd.
Temple
City, CA 91780
|
||
All
current Directors who are not Executive Officers as a
Group
|
1,050,000
|
*
|
Jonathan
Lei
|
86,969,525
|
25.54%
|
470
Linfield Place #C
Goleta,
CA 93117
|
|
*Indicates
beneficial ownership of less than
1%.
|
(1)
|
Except
as pursuant to applicable community property laws, the persons named
in
the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all
shares
of common stock beneficially owned. The total number of issued and
outstanding shares and the total number of shares owned by each person
does not include unexercised warrants and stock options, and is calculated
as of September 12, 2008.
|
(2)
|
Includes
4,803,425 shares which may be purchased pursuant to stock options
that are
exercisable within 60 days of September 12,
2008.
|
(3)
|
Includes
2,500,000 shares which may be purchased pursuant to stock options
that are
exercisable within 60 days of September 12,
2008.
|
(4)
|
Includes
1,000,000 shares which may be purchased pursuant to stock options
that are
exercisable within 60 days of September 12,
2008.
|
-38-
ITEM
13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
None.
ITEM
14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
HJ
Associates & Consultants, LLP (“HJ”) has been the Company’s principal
auditing accountant firm since August 2006. HJ provided other
non-audit services to the Company. The Company's Board of Directors has
considered whether the provisions of non-audit services are compatible with
maintaining HJ independence.
Audit
Fees
An
aggregate of $39,400 was billed by our auditors for the following professional
services: audit of the annual financial statement of the Company for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2008, and review of the interim financial statements
included in quarterly reports on Form 10-QSB for the periods ended September
30,
2007, December 31, 2007, and March 31, 2008.
An
aggregate of $22,227 was billed by our auditors for the following professioinal
services: audit of the annual financial statement of the Company for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 2007, and review of the interim financial statements
included in quarterly reports on Form 10-QSB for the periods ended September
30,
2006, December 31, 2006, and March 31, 2007.
Tax
Fees
Our
auditors billed the Company $3,522 for tax preparation services during the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2008.
Our
auditors billed the Company $2,694 for tax
preparation services during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007.
ITEM
15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) Exhibits
Exhibit Description
|
3.1
|
Articles
of Incorporation (1)
|
|
3.2
|
Bylaws
(1)
|
4.1 | Specimen Certificate for Common Stock (1) |
4.2 | Non-Qualified Employee Stock Option Plan (2) |
4.3 | Convertible Debenture dated December 28, 2005 (3) |
4.4 | Form of $0.08 Warrant (3) |
4.5 | Form of $0.10 Warrant (3) |
4.6 | Form of $0.12 Warrant (3) |
5.1 | Opinion of Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LLP(3) |
10.1 | First Agreement and Plan of Reorganization between Latinocare Management Corporation, a Nevada corporation, and Warp 9, Inc., a Delaware corporation (4) |
10.2 | Second Agreement and Plan of Reorganization between Latinocare Management Corporation, a Nevada corporation, and Warp 9, Inc., a Delaware corporation (5) |
10.3 | Exchange Agreement and Representations for shareholders of Warp 9, Inc.(4) |
10.4 | Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of March 28, 2005 between Roaming Messenger, Inc. and Wings Fund, Inc.(6) |
-39-
10.5 | Periodic Equity Investment Agreement dated as of March 28, 2005 between Roaming Messenger, Inc. and Wings Fund, Inc. (6) |
10.6 | Registration Rights Agreement dated as of March 28, 2005 between Roaming Messenger, Inc. and Wings Fund, Inc. (6) |
10.7 | Securities Purchase Agreement dated December 28, 2005 between the Company and Cornell Capital Partners LLP (3) |
10.8 | Investor Registration Rights Agreement dated December 28, 2005 (3) |
|
10.9
|
Insider
Pledge and Escrow Agreement dated December 28, 2005 by and among
the
Company, Cornell and David Gonzalez as escrow agent
(3)
|
|
10.10
|
Security
Agreement dated December 28, 2005 by and between the Company and
Cornell
(3)
|
|
10.11
|
Escrow
Agreement Dated December 28, 2005 by and among the Company, Cornell
and
David Gonzalez, as Escrow Agent (3)
|
|
10.12
|
Irrevocable
Transfer Agent Instructions (3)
|
|
10.13
|
Exclusive
Technology License Agreement, dated September 18, 2006
(8)
|
|
10.14
|
Subscription
Agreement with Zingerang Inc., dated September 18, 2006
(8)
|
|
10.15
|
Termination
of License Agreement with Carbon Sciences, Inc., dated April 2, 2007
(9)
|
|
21.1
|
List
of Subsidiaries (7)
|
|
31.1
|
Section
302 Certification of Principal Executive
Officer
|
|
31.2
|
Section
302 Certification of Principal Financial/Accounting
Officer
|
|
32.1
|
Section
906 Certification of Principal Executive
Officer
|
|
(1)
|
Incorporated
by reference from the exhibits included with the Company's prior
Report on
Form 10-KSB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, dated
March
31, 2002.
|
|
(2)
|
Incorporated
by reference from the exhibits included in the Company's Information
Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, dated
August
1, 2003.
|
|
(3)
|
Incorporated
by reference from the exhibits included in the Company's Current
Report on
Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December
29,
2005.
|
|
(4)
|
Incorporated
by reference from the exhibits included with the Company's prior
Report on
Form SC 14F1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, dated
April 8, 2003.
|
|
(5)
|
Incorporated
by reference from the exhibits included with the Company's prior
Report on
Form 8K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, dated
May 30,
2003.
|
|
(6)
|
Incorporated
by reference to exhibits filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form
8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission dated March
30,
2005.
|
|
(7)
|
Incorporated
by reference to the exhibits filed with the Company’s prior Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
dated
October 12, 2007.
|
|
(8)
|
Incorporated
by reference to exhibits filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form
8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, dated September
22,
2005.
|
|
(9)
|
Incorporated
by reference to exhibits filed with the Company’s Current Report on Form
8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, dated May
8,
2007.
|
-40-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of
1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed
on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dated:
September 29, 2008
|
WARP
9, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
\s\Harinder Dhillon
|
|
Harinder
Dhillon, Chief Executive Officer and
President
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed
below
by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities
and
on the dates indicated.
By:
\s\Louie Ucciferri
|
Dated:
September 29, 2008
|
Louie
Ucciferri, Chairman, Corporate Secretary, Acting
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer (Principal
Financial / Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
By:
\s\Harinder Dhillon
|
Dated: September
29, 2008
|
Harinder
Dhillon, Chief Executive Officer
and President
|
|
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
-41-