AIR T INC - Quarter Report: 2006 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
|
|
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
|
|
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
|
|
FORM
10-Q
|
|
(Mark
one)
|
|
X
|
Quarterly
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of
1934 for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006
|
Transition
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of
1934 for the transition period from _____to _____
|
|
|
|
|
Commission
File
Number 0-11720
|
Air
T, Inc.
|
|
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
Delaware
52-1206400
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employer
|
|
incorporation
or
organization)
Identification No.)
|
|
Post
Office Box 488, Denver, North Carolina 28037
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices, including zip code)
|
|
(704)
377-2109
|
|
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
|
|
Indicate
by
check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be
filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject
to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
|
|
Yes __
X___ No
______
|
|
Indicate
by
check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer (see definition of
“accelerated filer and large accelerated filer) in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act)
|
|
Large
Accelerated Filer_____ Accelerated Filer______ Non-Accelerated
Filer__X___
|
|
Indicate
by
check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act)
|
|
Yes______
No ___X___
|
|
APPLICABLE
ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
|
|
Indicate
the
number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common
stock, as of the latest practicable date.
|
|
2,671,293
Common Shares, par value of $.25 per share were outstanding as of
July 28,
2006.
|
|
|
1
AIR
T, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||
INDEX
|
|||||
PAGE
|
|||||
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|||||
|
|||||
Item
1. Financial Statements
|
|||||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|||||
for
the three-months ended
|
|||||
June
30, 2006 and 2005 (Unaudited)
|
3
|
||||
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets at
|
|||||
June
30, 2006 (Unaudited)
|
|||||
and
March 31, 2006
|
4
|
||||
|
|||||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash
|
|||||
Flows
for the three-months
|
|||||
ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005 (Unaudited)
|
5
|
||||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’
|
|||||
Equity
and Other Comprehensive Income for the
|
|||||
three-months
ended June 30,
|
|||||
2006
and 2005(Unaudited)
|
6
|
||||
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial
|
|||||
Statements
(Unaudited)
|
7-13
|
||||
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis
|
||||
of
Financial Condition and Results
|
|||||
of
Operations
|
13-19
|
||||
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosure
|
||||
About
Market Risk
|
19
|
||||
|
|||||
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
19-20
|
|||
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|||||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
20-21
|
|||
|
|||||
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
22
|
|||
Signatures
|
22
|
||||
Exhibit
Index
|
23
|
||||
2
Item
1.
Financial Statements
AIR
T,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
Three
Months Ended
|
|||||||
|
June
30,
|
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Operating
Revenues:
|
|||||||
Overnight
air cargo
|
$
|
8,575,952
|
$
|
11,228,153
|
|||
Ground
equipment
|
7,507,857
|
5,988,148
|
|||||
16,083,809
|
17,216,301
|
||||||
Operating
Expenses:
|
|||||||
Flight-air
cargo
|
4,173,861
|
4,345,200
|
|||||
Maintenance-air
cargo
|
3,098,683
|
5,273,977
|
|||||
Ground
equipment
|
5,258,264
|
4,723,260
|
|||||
General
and administrative
|
2,271,552
|
2,272,398
|
|||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
176,834
|
154,772
|
|||||
14,979,194
|
16,769,607
|
||||||
Operating
Income
|
1,104,615
|
446,694
|
|||||
Non-operating
Expense (Income):
|
|||||||
Interest
|
4,109
|
25,226
|
|||||
Deferred
retirement expense
|
5,250
|
5,250
|
|||||
Investment
income and other
|
(60,441
|
)
|
(33,220
|
)
|
|||
(51,082
|
)
|
(2,744
|
)
|
||||
Earnings
Before Income Taxes
|
1,155,697
|
449,438
|
|||||
Income
Tax Expense
|
428,902
|
171,368
|
|||||
Net
Earnings
|
$
|
726,795
|
$
|
278,070
|
|||
Basic
and Diluted Net Earnings Per Share
|
$
|
0.27
|
$
|
0.10
|
|||
Weighted
Average Shares Outstanding:
|
|||||||
Basic
|
2,671,293
|
2,671,293
|
|||||
Diluted
|
2,671,732
|
2,671,896
|
|||||
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
3
AIR T, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
June30,
2006
|
March
31, 2006
|
|||||
ASSETS
|
(Unaudited
|
)
|
(Note
|
)
|
|||
Current
Assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
5,757,184
|
$
|
2,702,424
|
|||
Marketable
securities
|
796,005
|
807,818
|
|||||
Accounts
receivable, less allowance
|
|||||||
for
doubtful accounts of $495,385 at June
|
|||||||
30,
2006 and $481,837 at March 31, 2006
|
4,411,730
|
8,692,971
|
|||||
Income
taxes receivable
|
-
|
108,553
|
|||||
Notes
and other non-trade receivables-current
|
69,873
|
104,086
|
|||||
Inventories,
net
|
6,973,331
|
5,705,591
|
|||||
Deferred
tax assets
|
686,953
|
576,640
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other
|
122,942
|
334,064
|
|||||
Total
Current Assets
|
18,818,018
|
19,032,147
|
|||||
Property
and Equipment
|
8,376,786
|
9,076,063
|
|||||
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
(5,896,781
|
)
|
(5,907,520
|
)
|
|||
Property
and Equipment, net
|
2,480,005
|
3,168,543
|
|||||
Deferred
Tax Assets
|
163,344
|
194,996
|
|||||
Cash
Surrender Value of Life Insurance Policies
|
1,248,481
|
1,231,481
|
|||||
Notes
and Other Non-Trade Receivables-Long Term
|
237,871
|
214,653
|
|||||
Other
Assets
|
46,001
|
81,537
|
|||||
Total
Assets
|
$
|
22,993,720
|
$
|
23,923,357
|
|||
|
|||||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|||||||
Current
Liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
4,779,712
|
$
|
5,354,713
|
|||
Income
taxes payable
|
79,715
|
-
|
|||||
Accrued
expenses
|
1,696,511
|
2,411,262
|
|||||
Current
portion of long-term debt and obligations
|
180,834
|
186,492
|
|||||
Total
Current Liabilities
|
6,736,772
|
7,952,467
|
|||||
Capital
Lease Obligations (less current portion)
|
46,203
|
50,577
|
|||||
Long-Term
Debt (less current portion)
|
937,582
|
712,883
|
|||||
Deferred
Retirement Obligations (less current portion)
|
695,213
|
707,388
|
|||||
Stockholders'
Equity:
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock, $1 par value, authorized 50,000 shares,
|
|||||||
none
issued
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Common
stock, par value $.25; authorized 4,000,000 shares;
|
|||||||
2,671,293
shares issued and outstanding
|
667,823
|
667,823
|
|||||
Additional
paid in capital
|
6,970,107
|
6,939,357
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
6,899,355
|
6,840,383
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income, net
|
40,665
|
52,479
|
|||||
14,577,950
|
14,500,042
|
||||||
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
$
|
22,993,720
|
$
|
23,923,357
|
|||
|
|||||||
Note:
The balance sheet at March 31, 2006 has been derived from the audited
consolidated
|
|||||||
financial
statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the
|
|||||||
fiscal
year ended March 31, 2006.
|
|||||||
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
|
4
AIR
T,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
|
Three
Months Ended
|
||||||
|
June
30,
|
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
726,795
|
$
|
278,070
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net earnings to net
|
|||||||
cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|||||||
Change
in accounts receivable and inventory reserves
|
162,579
|
2,187
|
|||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
176,834
|
154,772
|
|||||
Increase
in cash surrender value of life insurance
|
(17,000
|
)
|
(25,000
|
)
|
|||
Deferred
tax provision
|
(78,661
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Net
periodic pension cost
|
2,303
|
19,999
|
|||||
Warranty
reserve
|
(47,767
|
)
|
(21,000
|
)
|
|||
Vesting
of stock option expense
|
30,750
|
-
|
|||||
Change
in assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash:
|
|||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
4,267,693
|
1,375,503
|
|||||
Notes
receivable
|
10,995
|
37,033
|
|||||
Income
taxes receivable/payable
|
188,268
|
146,589
|
|||||
Inventories
|
(871,035
|
)
|
(757,203
|
)
|
|||
Prepaid
expenses and other
|
246,658
|
11,696
|
|||||
Accounts
payable
|
(575,001
|
)
|
(1,139,523
|
)
|
|||
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
(681,463
|
)
|
263,243
|
||||
Total
adjustments
|
2,815,153
|
68,296
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
3,541,948
|
346,366
|
|||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
(34,032
|
)
|
(107,007
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(34,032
|
)
|
(107,007
|
)
|
|||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||||||
Payments
on aircraft term loan
|
(22,243
|
)
|
(24,202
|
)
|
|||
Net
borrowings on line of credit
|
280,211
|
417,555
|
|||||
Payments
on capital leases
|
(43,301
|
)
|
3,119
|
||||
Payment
of cash dividend
|
(667,823
|
)
|
(667,633
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(453,156
|
)
|
(271,161
|
)
|
|||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash & cash equivalents
|
3,054,760
|
(31,802
|
)
|
||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
2,702,424
|
3,497,659
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
5,757,184
|
$
|
3,465,857
|
|||
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|||||||
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
|||||||
Interest
|
$
|
24,518
|
$
|
38,353
|
|||
Income
taxes
|
318,060
|
22,677
|
|||||
Summary
of significant non-cash information:
|
|||||||
Increase
(decrease) in fair value of marketable securities, net of
tax
|
$
|
(11,814
|
)
|
$
|
26,041
|
||
Leased
equipment transferred from inventory
|
(766,022
|
)
|
(806,728
|
)
|
|||
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
|
5
AIR
T,
INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
|
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Common
Stock
|
Additional
|
Retained
|
Other
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||
|
Paid-in
|
Earnings
|
Comprehensive
|
Stockholders'
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
|
Income
|
Equity
|
|||||||||||||
Balance,
March 31, 2005
|
2,671,293
|
$
|
667,823
|
$
|
6,939,357
|
$
|
5,453,105
|
$
|
25,268
|
$
|
13,085,553
|
||||||||
Comprehensive
Income:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
278,070
|
||||||||||||||||||
Change
in investment value,
|
|||||||||||||||||||
net
of tax
|
26,041
|
||||||||||||||||||
Change
in fair value of
|
|||||||||||||||||||
derivative
instruments, net of tax
|
|
13,296
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Total
Comprehensive Income
|
317,407
|
||||||||||||||||||
Cash
dividend
|
|||||||||||||||||||
($0.25
per share)
|
(667,633
|
)
|
(667,633
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance,
June 30, 2005
|
2,671,293
|
$
|
667,823
|
$
|
6,939,357
|
$
|
5,063,542
|
$
|
64,605
|
$
|
12,735,327
|
||||||||
|
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Common
Stock
|
Additional
|
Retained
|
Other
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||
|
Paid-In
|
Earnings
|
Comprehensive
|
Stockholders'
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
|
Income
(Loss
|
)
|
Equity
|
||||||||||||
Balance,
March 31, 2006
|
2,671,293
|
$
|
667,823
|
$
|
6,939,357
|
$
|
6,840,383
|
$
|
52,479
|
$
|
14,500,042
|
||||||||
Comprehensive
Income:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
726,795
|
||||||||||||||||||
Change
in investment value,
|
|||||||||||||||||||
net
of tax
|
(11,814
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
Comprehensive Income
|
714,981
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Cash
dividend
|
|||||||||||||||||||
($0.25
per share)
|
(667,823
|
)
|
(667,823
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Vesting
of stock options
|
30,750
|
30,750
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance,
June 30, 2006
|
2,671,293
|
$
|
667,823
|
$
|
6,970,107
|
$
|
6,899,355
|
$
|
40,665
|
$
|
14,577,950
|
||||||||
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
|
6
AIR
T,
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1.
Financial
Statement Presentation
The
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2006 and the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations, Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Cash
Flows and the Condensed Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive
Income, for the three-months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 have been prepared
by
Air T, Inc. (the Company) without audit. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to
present fairly the consolidated financial position, results of operations and
cash flows as of June 30, 2006, and for prior periods presented, have been
made.
It
is
suggested that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2006. The results of
operations for the period ended June 30 are not necessarily indicative of the
operating results for the full year.
2.
Income
Taxes
The
tax
effect of temporary differences, primarily asset reserves and accrued
liabilities, gave rise to the Company's deferred tax asset in the accompanying
June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006 consolidated balance sheets.
Deferred
income taxes are recognized for the tax consequence of such temporary
differences at the enacted tax rate expected to be in effect when the
differences reverse.
The
income tax provision for the respective three-months ended June 30, 2006 and
2005 differ from the federal statutory rate primarily as a result of state
income taxes and, to a lesser extent, other permanent differences.
3.
Net
Earnings Per Share
Basic
earnings per share has been calculated by dividing net earnings by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during each period. For purposes
of
calculating diluted earnings per share, shares issuable under employee stock
options were considered potential common shares and were included in the
weighted average common shares unless they were anti-dilutive. As of June 30,
2006 and 2005, 1,000 outstanding stock options were anti-dilutive.
The
computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share is as
follows:
|
Three
Months Ended
|
||||||
|
June
30,
|
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
726,795
|
$
|
278,070
|
|||
Basic
and Diluted Net Earnings Per Share
|
$
|
0.27
|
$
|
0.10
|
|||
Weighted
Average Shares Outstanding:
|
|||||||
Basic
|
2,671,293
|
2,671,293
|
|||||
Plus:
Incremental shares from stock options
|
439
|
603
|
|||||
Diluted
|
2,671,732
|
2,671,896
|
7
4. Inventories
Inventories
consist of the following:
|
June
30, 2006
|
March
31, 2006
|
|||||
Aircraft
parts and supplies
|
$
|
623,610
|
$
|
621,111
|
|||
Ground
equipment manufacturing:
|
|||||||
Raw
materials
|
5,549,233
|
4,178,451
|
|||||
Work
in process
|
805,466
|
1,270,944
|
|||||
Finished
goods
|
594,640
|
85,672
|
|||||
Total
inventory
|
7,572,949
|
6,156,178
|
|||||
Reserves
|
(599,618
|
)
|
(450,587
|
)
|
|||
Total,
net of reserves
|
$
|
6,973,331
|
$
|
5,705,591
|
5. Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
June
2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Interpretation
("FIN") No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109." This Interpretation prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement
recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken
in a
tax return, and provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest
and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. This
Interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2006.
At
June
30, 2006, the Company had one stock option plan (the Plan) in effect, which
is
discussed more fully below. Prior to April 1, 2006, the Company accounted for
the Plan under the recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion No.
25,
Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees,
and
related Interpretations, as permitted by FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation.
No
stock-based employee compensation cost was recognized in the Statement of
Operations for the three-month period ended June 30, 2005, as no options were
granted during that period. Effective April 1, 2006, the Company adopted the
fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123(R), Share-Based
Payment,
using
the modified-prospective method. Under this method, compensation cost recognized
in the three month period ended June 30, 2006 included: (a) compensation cost
for a quarter of all share-based payments granted prior to April 1, 2006, but
not yet vested as of June 30, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated
in accordance with the original provisions of Statement 123, and (b)
compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to March
31,
2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the
provisions of Statement 123(R). Results for the prior period have not been
restated.
As
a
result of adopting Statement 123(R) on April 1, 2006, the Company’s income
before income taxes and net income for the three months ended June 30, 2006,
was
$30,750 and $18,476 lower, respectively, than if it had continued to account
for
share-based compensation under APB Opinion No. 25. Basic and diluted earnings
per share for the three months ended June 30, 2006 would have been $0.28 and
$0.28, respectively, if the Company had not adopted Statement 123(R), compared
to reported basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.27 and $0.27,
respectively.
Prior
to
the adoption of Statement 123(R), the Company did not present tax benefits
of
deductions resulting from the exercise of stock options as operating cash flows
in the Statement of Cash Flows. Statement 123(R) requires the cash flows
resulting from the tax benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of
the
compensation cost recognized for those options (excess tax benefits) to be
classified as financing cash flows.
No
options were granted under the Company’s stock option plan for the three months
ended June 30, 2006 or 2005.
8
The
compensation cost that had been charged against net income for the Plan was
$18,476 and $-0- for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. The total income tax benefit recognized in the income statement
for the share-based compensation arrangements was $12,274 and $-0- for the
three
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The
Company’s Plan, which is shareholder-approved, permits the grant of share
options and shares to its employees and non-employee directors for up to 250,000
shares of common stock. The Company believes that such awards better align
the
interests of its employees and directors with those of its shareholders. Option
awards are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the market price
of
the Company’s stock at the date of grant; for employee options, the plan
provides that awards generally vest one-third per year after the first
anniversary date from the date of grant; for non-employee director options,
those option awards vest one year after the date of grant; all options have
10-year contractual terms. Dividends are not paid on unexercised options.
Certain options and share awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is
a
change in control (as defined in the Plan). No employee options have been
awarded under the plan.
The
fair
value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing formula that uses the assumptions noted in the
following table. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of
the
Company’s stock, and other factors. Dividend yields are based on the last three
years’ dividends divided by the average high and low stock prices for the
period. The expected term of options granted is derived from the output of
the
option valuation model and represents the period of time that options granted
are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate for periods within the
contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in
effect at the time of grant.
Three
Months Ended
|
||||
|
June
30, 2006
|
|||
Expected
volatility
|
92.01
|
%
|
||
Expected
dividends
|
1.90
|
%
|
||
Expected
term (in years)
|
10.0
|
|||
Risk-free
rate
|
3.86
|
%
|
A
summary
of option activity under the Plan as of June 30, 2006, and changes during the
three months then ended is presented below:
|
Weighted
|
||||||||||||
|
Weighted
|
Average
|
|||||||||||
|
Average
|
Remaining
|
Aggregate
|
||||||||||
|
Exercise
|
Contractual
|
Intrinsic
|
||||||||||
|
Shares
|
Price
|
Term
(yrs
|
)
|
Value
|
||||||||
Options
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
at April 1, 2006
|
17,000
|
$
|
11.02
|
9.9
|
$
|
1,190
|
|||||||
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||
Exercised
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||
Expired
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||
Outstanding
at June 30, 2006
|
17,000
|
$
|
11.02
|
9.7
|
$
|
1,190
|
|||||||
Vested
or expected to vest
|
|||||||||||||
at
June 30, 2006
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Exercisable
at June 30, 2006
|
2,000
|
$
|
17.58
|
5.3
|
$
|
-
|
|||||||
No
options were granted or exercised during the three months ended June 30, 2006
and 2005.
9
A
summary
of the status of the Company’s nonvested shares as of June 30, 2006, and changes
during the three months ended June 30, 2006, is presented below:
|
Average
|
||||||
|
Grant-Date
|
||||||
Shares
|
Fair
Value
|
||||||
Nonvested
at April 1, 2006
|
15,000
|
$
|
123,000
|
||||
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Vested
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Nonvested
at June 30, 2006
|
15,000
|
$
|
123,000
|
||||
As
of
June 30, 2006, there was $30,750 of total unrecognized compensation cost related
to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan.
That
cost is expected to be recognized in the quarter ended September 30, 2006.
No
shares vested during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.
6. Warranty
Reserves
The
Company’s ground equipment subsidiary warranties its products for up to a
two-year period from date of sale. Product warranty reserves are recorded at
time of sale based on the historical average warranty cost and are adjusted
quarterly as actual warranty cost becomes known.
Product
warranty reserve activity during the three-months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
are as follows:
|
Three
Months Ended
|
||||||
|
June
30,
|
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Beginning
balance
|
$
|
285,000
|
$
|
198,000
|
|||
Additions
and adjustments to reserve
|
(34,000
|
)
|
(7,000
|
)
|
|||
Use
of reserve
|
(14,000
|
)
|
(14,000
|
)
|
|||
Ending
balance
|
$
|
237,000
|
$
|
177,000
|
7. Derivative
Financial Instruments
As
required by SFAS No. 133, Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,
the
Company recognizes all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the
consolidated balance sheet and measures those instruments at fair value.
The
Company is exposed to market risk, such as changes in interest rates. To manage
the volatility relating to interest rate risk, the Company may enter into
interest rate hedging arrangements from time to time.
The
Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading
or
speculative purposes. As of June 30, 2006 the Company had no derivative
financial instruments outstanding. The Company is exposed to changes in interest
rates on certain portions of its line of credit, which bears interest based
on
the 30-day LIBOR rate plus 137 basis points. If the LIBOR interest rate had
been
increased by one percentage point, based on the balance of the line of credit
at
June 30, 2006, annual interest expense would have increased by approximately
$2,800.
10
8. Financing
Arrangements
In
August
2005, the Company amended its $7,000,000 secured long-term revolving credit
line
to extend its expiration date to August 31, 2007. In order to more closely
match
the credit line’s limits to the Company’s financing needs, the credit line limit
was amended to $8,000,000 from January 12, 2006 to April 30, 2006 and $7,000,000
from May 1, 2006 to expiration date. The revolving credit line contains
customary events of default, a subjective acceleration clause and restrictive
covenants that, among other matters, require the Company to maintain certain
financial ratios. There is no requirement for the Company to maintain a lock-box
arrangement under this agreement. As of June 30, 2006, the Company was in
compliance with all of the restrictive covenants. The amount of credit available
to the Company under the agreement at any given time is determined by an
availability calculation, based on the eligible borrowing base, as defined
in
the credit agreement, which includes the Company’s outstanding receivables,
inventories and equipment, with certain exclusions. At June 30, 2006, $6,185,000
was available under the terms of the credit facility. The credit facility is
secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets.
Amounts
advanced under the credit facility bear interest at the 30-day “LIBOR” rate plus
137 basis points. The LIBOR rate at June 30, 2006 was 5.33%. At June 30, 2006
$280,000 was outstanding against the line.
In
March
2004, the Company utilized its revolving credit line to acquire a corporate
aircraft for $975,000. In April 2004, the Company refinanced the aircraft under
a secured 4.35% fixed rate five-year term loan, based on a ten-year amortization
with a balloon payment at the end of the fifth year.
The
Company assumes various financial obligations and commitments in the normal
course of its operations and financing activities. Financial obligations are
considered to represent known future cash payments that the Company is required
to make under existing contractual arrangements such as debt and lease
agreements.
9. Segment
Information
The
Company operates three subsidiaries in two business segments, overnight air
cargo and ground equipment. Each business segment has separate management teams
and infrastructures that offer different products and services. The overnight
air cargo segment encompasses services provided primarily to one customer,
Federal Express Corporation, and the ground equipment segment encompasses the
operations of Global Ground Support, LLC (“Global”).
The
Company evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on operating
income.
Segment
data is summarized as follows:
|
Three
Months Ended June 30,
|
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Operating
Revenues
|
|||||||
Overnight
Air Cargo
|
$
|
8,575,952
|
$
|
11,228,153
|
|||
Ground
Equipment:
|
|||||||
Domestic
|
7,470,357
|
5,905,398
|
|||||
International
|
37,500
|
82,750
|
|||||
Total
Ground Equipment
|
7,507,857
|
5,988,148
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
16,083,809
|
$
|
17,216,301
|
|||
Operating
Income (Loss)
|
|||||||
Overnight
Air Cargo
|
$
|
462,538
|
$
|
630,415
|
|||
Ground
Equipment
|
1,357,755
|
405,337
|
|||||
Corporate
(1)
|
(715,678
|
)
|
(589,058
|
)
|
|||
Total
|
$
|
1,104,615
|
$
|
446,694
|
|||
Depreciation
and Amortization
|
|||||||
Overnight
Air Cargo
|
$
|
125,957
|
$
|
103,697
|
|||
Ground
Equipment
|
39,040
|
34,496
|
|||||
Corporate
|
11,837
|
16,579
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
176,834
|
$
|
154,772
|
|||
Capital
Expenditures, net
|
|||||||
Overnight
Air Cargo
|
$
|
5,000
|
$
|
63,629
|
|||
Ground
Equipment
|
-
|
10,219
|
|||||
Corporate
|
29,032
|
33,159
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
34,032
|
$
|
107,007
|
|||
|
As
of
|
||||||
|
June
30, 2006
|
March
31, 2006
|
|||||
Identifiable
Assets
|
|||||||
Overnight
Air Cargo
|
$
|
4,401,493
|
$
|
6,298,618
|
|||
Ground
Equipment
|
10,739,420
|
12,620,815
|
|||||
Corporate
|
7,852,807
|
5,003,924
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
22,993,720
|
$
|
23,923,357
|
|||
(1)
Includes income from inter-segment transactions.
|
11
10. Commitments
and Contingencies
On
February
28, 2005, a 135-foot fixed-stand deicing boom sold by Global for installation
at
the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania airport, and maintained by Global, collapsed
on
an Airbus A330 aircraft operated by U.S. Airways. While the aircraft suffered
some structural damage, no passengers or crew on the aircraft were injured.
The
operator of the deicing boom has claimed to suffer injuries in connection with
the collapse. Immediately following this incident, the remaining eleven fixed
stand deicing booms sold by Global and installed at the Philadelphia airport
were placed out of service pending investigation of their structural soundness.
These booms include 114-foot smaller deicing booms, as well as additional
135-foot extended deicing booms. All of these booms were designed, fabricated
and installed by parties other than Global and are the only booms of this model
that have been sold by Global.
In
June
2005, after an independent structural engineering firm’s investigation
identified specific design flaws and structural defects in the remaining 11
booms and Global’s subcontractor declined to participate in efforts to return
the remaining 11 booms to service, Global agreed with the City of Philadelphia
to effect specific repairs to the remaining 11 booms. Under this agreement,
Global agreed to effect the repairs to these booms at its expense and reserved
its rights to recover these expenses from any third party ultimately determined
to be responsible for defects and flaws in these booms. The agreement provides
that if Global performs its obligations under the agreement, the City of
Philadelphia will not pursue any legal remedies against Global for the
identified design flaws and structural defects with respect to these 11 booms.
However, the City of Philadelphia retains its rights with respect to any cause
of action arising from the collapse of the boom in February 2005.
On
October 14, 2005, Global completed the repair, installation and recertification
of ten of the deicing booms. Repair had been completed on the eleventh boom,
which was then damaged in transit to the Philadelphia airport by an independent
carrier. The additional repair work on that boom has been completed and the
boom
is awaiting delivery back to the airport. The carrier had initially undertaken
that such further repair work would be at its expense, though the carrier has
not yet approved the final expense of such repair work.
12
Global
has been named as a defendant in two legal actions arising from the February
2005 boom collapse at the Philadelphia airport. In the first, U.S.
Airways vs. Elliott Equipment Company, et al.,
which
is pending in United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania, U.S. Airways initiated an action on April 7, 2006 against Global
and its subcontractor seeking to recover approximately $2.9 million,
representing the alleged cost to repair of the damaged Airbus A330 aircraft
and
loss of use of the aircraft while it was being repaired. This matter is in
the
initial stage of discovery. In the second action, Emerson
vs. Elliott Equipment Company, et al.,
pending
in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, the boom operator is seeking
to recover unspecified damages from Global and its subcontractor for injuries
arising from the collapse of the boom. This matter was initiated on October
21,
2005 and is scheduled for trial in November 2007. The Company understands that
the boom operator has recovered from his injuries and has returned to fulltime
work. Global maintains product liability insurance in excess of the amount
of
the recoveries claimed above and is being defended in both of these matters
by
its product liability insurance carrier. Global’s insurance coverage does not
extend to the costs incurred by Global to examine and repair the other 11 booms
at the Philadelphia airport.
On
August
4, 2005, Global commenced litigation in the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia
County, Pennsylvania against Glazer Enterprises, Inc. t/a Elliott Equipment
Company, Global’s subcontractor that designed, fabricated and warrantied the
booms at the Philadelphia airport, seeking to recover approximately $905,000
in
costs incurred by Global in fiscal 2006 in connection with repairing the 11
booms and any damages arising from the collapse of the boom in February 2005.
That case has been removed to federal court and is pending before United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and has been assigned
to
the same judge before whom the U.S. Airways litigation is pending against
Global. This matter is in the initial stage of discovery. The Company cannot
provide assurance that it will be able to recover its repair expenses, or
otherwise be successful, in this action.
The
Company is currently involved in certain personal injury and environmental
matters, which involve pending or threatened lawsuits. Management believes
the
results of these pending or threatened lawsuits will not have a material adverse
effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial
position.
Item
2.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
Overview
The
Company operates in two business segments, providing overnight air cargo
services to the express delivery services industry and aviation ground support
and other specialized equipment products to passenger and cargo airlines,
airports, the military and industrial customers. Each business segment has
separate management teams and infrastructures that offer different products
and
services. The Company’s air cargo operations, which are comprised of its
Mountain Air Cargo, Inc. (“MAC”) and CSA Air, Inc. (“CSA”) subsidiaries,
accounted
for 53.3% and 65.2% of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and
2005, respectively. The Company’s ground support operations, comprised of its
Global Ground Support, LLC subsidiary (“Global”), accounted for the remaining
46.7% and 34.8% of revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
MAC
and
CSA provide short-haul express air freight services primarily to one customer,
Federal Express Corporation (the Customer). Under the terms of its Customer’s
dry-lease service agreements which currently cover approximately 98% of the
revenue aircraft operated, the Company charges an administrative fee and passes
through to its customer certain other cost components of its operations without
markup. The cost of fuel, flight crews, landing fees, outside maintenance,
parts
and certain other direct operating costs are included in operating expenses
and
billed to the customer as cargo and maintenance revenue, at cost.
Separate
agreements cover the four types of aircraft operated by MAC and CSA for their
customer—Cessna Caravan, ATR-42/72, Fokker F-27, and Short Brothers SD3-30.
Cessna Caravan, ATR-42/72 and Fokker F-27 aircraft (a total of 91 aircraft
at
June 30, 2006) are owned by and dry-leased from the Customer, and the Short
Brothers SD3-30 aircraft (two aircraft at June 30, 2006) are owned by the
Company.
13
The
SD3-30’s are operated periodically under wet-lease arrangements with the
Customer. Pursuant to such agreements, the Customer determines the type of
aircraft and schedule of routes to be flown by MAC and CSA, with all other
operational decisions made by the Company.
Agreements
with the customer are renewable annually and may be terminated by the Customer
at any time upon 15 to 30 days’ notice. The Company believes that the short term
and other provisions of its agreements with the Customer are standard within
the
air freight contract delivery service industry. Loss of its contracts with
the
Customer would have a material adverse effect on the Company.
MAC
and
CSA’s revenues contributed approximately $8,576,000 and $11,228,000 to the
Company’s revenues for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively, a current year decrease of approximately 24%. The decrease in
revenues was related to a decrease in maintenance services and acquisition
of
aircraft parts, which were primarily attributed to wind-down and completion
of
the customer’s fleet modernization, associated with conversion of ATR aircraft
from passenger to cargo configuration during fiscal 2006.
Global,
which provides the remainder of the Company’s revenue, manufactures, services
and supports aviation ground support and specialized military and industrial
equipment on a worldwide basis. Global’s revenue contributed approximately
$7,508,000 and $5,988,000 to the Company’s revenues for the three-month periods
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The approximately 25% increase
in
revenues was primarily related to an increase in the number and a change in
the
mix of customer equipment orders completed during the current period.
Global’s
results in fiscal 2006 were adversely affected as the result of the collapse
of
one of twelve fixed-stand deicing booms sold by Global for installation at
the
Philadelphia airport as detailed in Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies.
Following the collapse of the boom, Global undertook to examine and repair
the
eleven remaining booms and incurred expense of approximately $905,000 in fiscal
2006 in connection these activities. During the three-month period ended June
30, 2005 Global recorded approximately $373,000 in operating expenses in
connection with its efforts to return the booms to service. No boom repair
related costs were recorded in the quarter ended June 30, 2006. Although Global
has initiated legal action to recover these expenses from its subcontractor,
the
Company cannot provide assurance of the amount or timing of any such recovery.
Outlook
The
Company’s forecast for the remainder of fiscal 2007 suggests that, due to higher
fuel cost and increasing rates of inflation, the commercial aviation market
will
continue to grow at a rate that is less than the rest of the economy. Continued
international sales, military and Homeland Security budgets, pending funding
approvals, and increased activity by outside service providers which have taken
over the deicing responsibilities of several airlines and airports may help
offset the expected lower-than-normal order levels from domestic passenger
airline commercial customers. Company management currently anticipates that,
although, its air cargo segment will continue to benefit from the increased
administrative fees associated with its customer’s aircraft fleet modernization
and route expansion throughout fiscal 2007, decreased maintenance revenues
associated with the recent fleet modernization will reduce operating revenue
and
margins. Given the uncertainties associated with the above factors, the Company
continues to operate in a highly unpredictable environment.
Based
on
the current general worldwide political, economic and industry outlook and
cost
cutting measures implemented during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006 and first
quarter of fiscal 2007, the Company believes its existing cash and cash
equivalents, cash flow from operations, and funds available from current and
renewed credit facilities will be adequate to meet its current and anticipated
working capital requirements throughout fiscal 2007. If these sources are
inadequate or become unavailable, then the Company may pursue additional funds
through the financing of unencumbered assets or sale of equity securities,
although there is no assurance these additional funds will be sufficient to
replace the sources that are inadequate or become unavailable.
14
Actual
results for fiscal 2007 will depend upon a number of factors beyond the
Company’s control, including, in part, the magnitude of future international
orders, potential additional transition of the aircraft fleet operated for
the
Company’s air cargo customer, the timing, speed and magnitude of the economic
recovery of the aviation industry, military funding of pending future equipment
orders, future levels of commercial aviation capital spending, future terrorists
acts and weather patterns.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The
preparation of the Company’s financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires the use of estimates and
assumptions to determine certain assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses.
Management bases these estimates and assumptions upon the best information
available at the time of the estimates or assumptions. The Company’s estimates
and assumptions could change materially as conditions within and beyond our
control change. Accordingly, actual results could differ materially from
estimates. The most significant estimates made by management include allowance
for doubtful accounts receivable, reserves for excess and obsolete inventories,
warranty reserves, deferred tax asset valuation, retirement benefit obligations,
valuation of revenue recognized under the percentage-of-completion method and
valuation of long-lived assets.
Following
is a discussion of critical accounting policies and related management estimates
and assumptions.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts. An allowance for doubtful accounts receivable in the
amount of $495,000 and $482,000, respectively, as of June 30, 2006 and March
31,
2006, was established based on management’s estimates of the collectability of
accounts receivable. The required allowance is determined using information
such
as customer credit history, industry information, credit reports, customer
financial condition and the collectability of outstanding accounts receivables
associated with a discontinued business segment. The estimates can be affected
by changes in the financial strength of the aviation industry, customer credit
issues or general economic conditions.
Inventories.
The Company’s parts inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market.
Reserves for excess and obsolete inventories in the amount of $600,000 and
$451,000, respectively, as of June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006, are based on
assessment of the marketability of slow-moving and obsolete inventories.
Estimates are subject to volatility and can be affected by reduced equipment
utilization, existing supplies of used inventory available for sale, the
retirement of aircraft or ground equipment and changes in the financial strength
of the aviation industry.
Warranty
Reserves. The Company warranties its ground equipment products for up to a
two-year period from date of sale. Product warranty reserves are recorded at
time of sale based on the historical average warranty cost and are adjusted
quarterly as actual warranty cost becomes known.
Product
warranty reserve activity during three-months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
are
as follows:
|
Three
Months Ended
|
||||||
|
June
30,
|
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Beginning
balance
|
$
|
285,000
|
$
|
198,000
|
|||
Additions
and adjustments to reserve
|
(34,000
|
)
|
(7,000
|
)
|
|||
Use
of reserve
|
(14,000
|
)
|
(14,000
|
)
|
|||
Ending
balance
|
$
|
237,000
|
$
|
177,000
|
Deferred
Taxes. Net deferred tax assets are shown net of valuation allowance in the
amount of $82,000, as of June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006 to reflect the
likelihood of the recoverability of certain of these assets. Company judgment
of
the recoverability of certain of these assets is based primarily on estimates
of
current and expected future earnings and tax planning.
15
Retirement
Benefits Obligation. The Company currently determines the value of retirement
benefits assets and liabilities on an actuarial basis using a 5.75% discount
rate. Long-term deferred retirement benefit obligations amounted to $695,000
and
$707,000, respectively, as of June 30, 2006 and March 31, 2006. Values are
affected by current independent indices, which estimate the expected return
on
insurance policies and the discount rates used. Changes in the discount rate
used will affect the amount of pension liability as well as pension gain or
loss
recognized in other comprehensive income.
In
2005,
the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors confirmed the level of
retirement benefits under existing agreements for certain executive officers
at
amounts approximately $510,000 less than had been previously accrued. Based
on
an estimated average term to retirement of these officers of four years, the
accrual was reduced by $129,000 in fiscal 2005, and, subject to other
adjustments, similar reductions would occur in the next three fiscal years.
The
reduction in the accrual reduced general and administrative expense by that
amount.
Revenue
Recognition. Cargo revenue is recognized upon completion of contract terms
and
maintenance revenue is recognized when the service has been performed. Revenue
from product sales is recognized when contract terms are completed and title
has
passed to customers. Revenues from long-term fixed price manufacturing projects
are recognized on the percentage-of-completion method. The Company was not
engaged in any long-term fixed-price contracts in the quarters ended June 30,
2006 and 2005.
Valuation
of Long-Lived Assets. The Company assesses long-lived assets used in operations
for impairment when events and circumstances indicate the assets may be impaired
and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are
less than their carrying amount. In the event it is determined that the carrying
values of long-lived assets are in excess of the fair value of those assets,
the
Company then will write-down the value of the assets to fair value.
Company
Adoption Of Stock Based Compensation Reporting Under FAS 123(R)
At
June
30, 2006, the Company had one stock option plan (the Plan) in effect, which
is
discussed more fully below. Prior to April 1, 2006, the Company accounted for
the Plan under the recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion No.
25,
Accounting
for Stock Issued to Employees,
and
related Interpretations, as permitted by FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation.
No
stock-based employee compensation cost was recognized in the Statement of
Operations for the three-month period ended June 30, 2005, as no options were
granted during that period. Effective April 1, 2006, the Company adopted the
fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123(R), Share-Based
Payment,
using
the modified-prospective method. Under this method, compensation cost recognized
in the three month period ended June 30, 2006 included: (a) compensation cost
for a quarter of all share-based payments granted prior to April 1, 2006, but
not yet vested as of June 30, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated
in accordance with the original provisions of Statement 123, and (b)
compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to March
31,
2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the
provisions of Statement 123(R). Results for the prior period have not been
restated.
As
a
result of adopting Statement 123(R) on April 1, 2006, the Company’s income
before income taxes and net income for the three months ended June 30, 2006,
was
$30,750 and $18,476 lower, respectively, than if it had continued to account
for
share-based compensation under APB Opinion No. 25. Basic and diluted earnings
per share for the three months ended June 30, 2006 would have been $0.28 and
$0.28, respectively, if the Company had not adopted Statement 123(R), compared
to reported basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.27 and $0.27,
respectively.
No
options were granted under the Company’s stock option plan for the three months
ended June 30, 2006 or 2005.
The
compensation cost that had been charged against net income for the Plan was
$18,476 and $-0- for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. The total income tax benefit recognized in the income statement
for the share-based compensation arrangements was $12,274 and $-0- for the
three
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
16
The
Company’s Plan, which is shareholder-approved, permits the grant of share
options and shares to its employees and non-employee directors for up to 250,000
shares of common stock. The company believes that such awards better align
the
interests of its employees and directors with those of its shareholders. Option
awards are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the market price
of
the Company’s stock at the date of grant; for employee options, the plan
provides that awards generally vest one-third per year after the first
anniversary date from the date of grant; for non-employee director options,
those option awards vest one year after the date of grant; all options have
10-year contractual terms. No employee options have been awarded under the
plan.
Dividends are not paid on unexercised options. Certain options and share awards
provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control (as defined
in
the Plan). The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of
grant
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing formula.
As
of
June 30, 2006, there was $30,750 of total unrecognized compensation cost related
to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan.
That
cost is expected to be recognized in the quarter ended September 30, 2006.
No
shares vested during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.
Seasonality
Global’s
business has historically been highly seasonal. Due to the nature of its product
line, the bulk of Global’s revenues and earnings have typically occurred during
the second and third fiscal quarters in anticipation of the winter season,
and
comparatively little has occurred during the first and fourth fiscal quarters.
The Company has continued its efforts to reduce Global’s seasonal fluctuation in
revenues and earnings by increasing international sales and broadening its
product line to increase revenues and earnings in the first and fourth fiscal
quarters. In June 1999, Global was awarded a four-year contract to supply
deicing equipment to the United States Air Force, and Global has been awarded
two three-year extensions on the contract. In March 2003 and December 2005
Global, respectively, received a large scale, fixed-stand deicer contract from
the City of Philadelphia and a large mobile deice equipment order from China,
which the Company believes contributed to management’s plan to reduce seasonal
fluctuation in revenues during fiscal 2004 and 2006. However, since these
contracts have been completed, Global is more susceptible to the resumption
of
historical seasonal trends. The remainder of the Company’s business is not
materially seasonal.
Results
of Operations
Consolidated
revenue decreased $1,132,000 (6.6%) to $16,084,000 for the three-month period
ended June 30, 2006 compared to its equivalent 2005 period. The decrease in
revenues resulted from a $2,652,000 decrease in air cargo maintenance revenues,
primarily related to decreased direct operating costs, passed through to the
Company’s Customer at cost, and maintenance service revenues, as discussed above
in Overview, offset by a $1,520,000 increase in the ground equipment revenue
related to increased deicer sales, as discussed above in Overview.
Operating
expenses decreased $1,790,000 (10.7%) to $14,979,000 for the three-month period
ended June 30, 2006 compared to its equivalent 2005 period. The net decrease
in
operating expenses consisted of the following: cost of flight operations
decreased $171,000 (3.9%) primarily as a result of decreased costs associated
with flight department and pilot staffing and pilot travel due to completion
of
customer flight schedule changes; maintenance expense decreased $2,175,000
(41.3%) primarily as a result of decreases in the volume of aircraft parts
purchased for ATR aircraft and cost of MAC and outside maintenance, maintenance
personnel, cost of travel and contract services, related to customer fleet
modernization; ground equipment operating expenses increased $535,000 (11.3%),
as a result of the current quarter’s increase in customer orders, partially
offset by $373,000 in costs related to the Philadelphia boom repairs booked
by
Global in the quarter ended June 30, 2005; depreciation and amortization
increased $22,000 (14.3%) as a result of depreciation on purchases of capital
assets; and general and administrative expense decreased $1,000 primarily as
a
result of decreased staff salaries and expense and professional fees, partially
offset by an increase in employee’s profit sharing provision.
17
The
current period’s increased operating income ($658,000) (147.0%) resulted
primarily from higher equipment unit sales and order mix in the ground equipment
sector, partly offset by decreased maintenance revenues associated with the
air
cargo segment.
Non-operating
expense, net, decreased $48,000 as a result an increase of earnings on
marketable securities and reduced interest expense due to lower levels of
borrowing in the three-month period ended June 30, 2006.
Pretax
earnings increased $706,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2006
compared to 2005, principally due to the above stated ground equipment segment’s
increased sales offset by decreased maintenance revenue related to the air
cargo
segment.
The
provision for income taxes for the three-month period ended June 30, 2006
increased $258,000 compared to the 2005 period, primarily due to increased
current period pretax earnings.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As
of
June 30, 2006 the Company's working capital amounted to $12,080,000, an increase
of $1,000,000 compared to March 31, 2006.
The net
increase primarily resulted from an increase in cash and cash equivalents and
inventory and a decrease in accounts payable and accrual expenses, partially
offset by a decrease in accounts receivable. The change in accounts receivable
was principally the result of the timing of payment of certain
accounts.
In
August
2005, the Company amended its $7,000,000 secured long-term revolving credit
line
to extend its expiration date to August 31, 2007. In order to more closely
match
the credit line’s limits to the Company’s financing needs, the credit line limit
was amended to $8,000,000 from January 12, 2006 to April 30, 2006 and $7,000,000
from May 1, 2006 to expiration date. The revolving credit line contains
customary events of default, a subjective acceleration clause and restrictive
covenants that, among other matters, require the Company to maintain certain
financial ratios. There is no requirement for the Company to maintain a lock-box
arrangement under this agreement. As of June 30, 2006, the Company was in
compliance with all of the restrictive covenants. The amount of credit available
to the Company under the agreement at any given time is determined by an
availability calculation, based on the eligible borrowing base, as defined
in
the credit agreement, which includes the Company’s outstanding receivables,
inventories and equipment, with certain exclusions. At June 30, 2006, $6,185,000
was available under the terms of the credit facility. The credit facility is
secured by substantially all of the Company’s assets.
Amounts
advanced under the credit facility bear interest at the 30-day “LIBOR” rate plus
137 basis points. The LIBOR rate at June 30, 2006 was 5.33%. At June 30, 2006
$280,000 was outstanding against the line.
In
March
2004, the Company utilized its revolving credit line to acquire a corporate
aircraft for $975,000. In April 2004, the Company refinanced the aircraft under
a secured 4.35% fixed rate five-year term loan, based on a ten-year amortization
with a balloon payment at the end of the fifth year.
The
Company assumes various financial obligations and commitments in the normal
course of its operations and financing activities. Financial obligations are
considered to represent known future cash payments that the Company is required
to make under existing contractual arrangements such as debt and lease
agreements.
The
respective three-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 resulted in the
following changes in cash flow: operating activities provided $3,542,000 and
$346,000 in 2006 and 2005, respectively, investing activities used $34,000
and
$107,000 in 2006 and 2005, respectively, and financing activities used $453,000
and $271,000 in 2006 and 2005, respectively. Net cash increased $3,055,000
and
decreased $32,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
Cash
provided by operating activities was $3,196,000 more for the three-months ended
June 30, 2006 compared to the similar 2005 period, principally due to decreased
accounts receivables.
18
Cash
used
in investing activities for the three-months ended June 30, 2006 was
approximately $73,000 less than the comparable period in 2005 due to decreased
current period capital expenditures.
Cash
used
in financing activities was $182,000 more in the 2006 three-month period than
in
the corresponding 2005 period due to a decrease in the current period line
of
credit borrowings.
There
are
currently no commitments for significant capital expenditures. The Company’s
Board of Directors on August 7, 1998 adopted the policy to pay an annual cash
dividend, based on profitability and other factors, in the first quarter of
each
fiscal year, in an amount to be determined by the Board. The Company paid a
$0.25 per share cash dividend in June 2006.
Derivative
Financial Instruments
As
required by SFAS No. 133, Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,
the
Company recognizes all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the
consolidated balance sheet and measures those instruments at fair value.
The
Company is exposed to market risk, such as changes in interest rates. To manage
the volatility relating to interest rate risk, the Company may enter into
interest rate hedging arrangements from time to time.
The
Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading
or
speculative purposes. As of June 30, 2006 the Company had no derivative
financial instruments outstanding. The Company is exposed to changes in interest
rates on certain portions of its line of credit, which bears interest based
on
the 30-day LIBOR rate plus 137 basis points. If the LIBOR interest rate had
been
increased by one percentage point, based on the balance of the line of credit
at
June 30, 2006, annual interest expense would have increased by approximately
$2,800.
Deferred
Retirement Obligation
Contractual
death benefits for the Company’s former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer who
passed away on April 18, 1997 are payable by the Company in the amount of
$75,000 per year for 10 years from the date of his death. As of June 30, 2006,
$64,000 has been reflected as a current liability and $32,000 has been reflected
as a long-term liability associated with this death benefit.
Impact
of Inflation
If
interest rates continue to rise, the Company believes the impact of inflation
and changing prices on its revenues and net earnings could have a material
effect on its manufacturing operations if the Company cannot increase prices
to
pass the additional costs on to its customers. Although the Company’s air cargo
business can pass through the major cost components of its operations, without
markup, under its current contract terms, higher rates of inflation could affect
our customer’s current business plans.
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Quantitative
and qualitative disclosures about market risk are included in Item 2.
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
As
of the
end of the period covered by this report, management, including the Company’s
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness
of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures with
respect to the information generated for use in this report. Based upon, and
as
of the date of that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief
Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were
effective to provide reasonable assurance that information
19
required
to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms, and that management
will
be timely alerted to material information required to be included in the
Company’s periodic reports filed with the Commission.
There
were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
during or subsequent to the first quarter of fiscal 2007 that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
It
should
be noted that while the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, believe that the Company’s disclosure
controls and procedures provide a reasonable level of assurance, they do not
expect that the disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls will
prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived
or operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the
objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control
system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the
benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of
the
inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can
provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud,
if
any, within
the
Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities
that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur
because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented
by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people,
or
by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls
is
based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events,
and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its
stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent
limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error
or
fraud may occur and not be detected.
PART
II
-- OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1.
Legal
Proceedings
On
February
28, 2005, a 135-foot fixed-stand deicing boom sold by Global for installation
at
the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania airport, and maintained by Global, collapsed
on
an Airbus A330 aircraft operated by U.S. Airways. While the aircraft suffered
some structural damage, no passengers or crew on the aircraft were injured.
The
operator of the deicing boom has claimed to suffer injuries in connection with
the collapse. Immediately following this incident, the remaining eleven fixed
stand deicing booms sold by Global and installed at the Philadelphia airport
were placed out of service pending investigation of their structural soundness.
These booms include 114-foot smaller deicing booms, as well as additional
135-foot extended deicing booms. All of these booms were designed, fabricated
and installed by parties other than Global and are the only booms of this model
that have been sold by Global.
In
June
2005, after an independent structural engineering firm’s investigation
identified specific design flaws and structural defects in the remaining 11
booms and Global’s subcontractor declined to participate in efforts to return
the remaining 11 booms to service, Global agreed with the City of Philadelphia
to effect specific repairs to the remaining 11 booms. Under this agreement,
Global agreed to effect the repairs to these booms at its expense and reserved
its rights to recover these expenses from any third party ultimately determined
to be responsible for defects and flaws in these booms. The agreement provides
that if Global performs its obligations under the agreement, the City of
Philadelphia will not pursue any legal remedies against Global for the
identified design flaws and structural defects with respect to these 11 booms.
However, the City of Philadelphia retains its rights with respect to any cause
of action arising from the collapse of the boom in February 2005.
20
On
October 14, 2005, Global completed the repair, installation and recertification
of ten of the deicing booms. Repair had been completed on the eleventh boom,
which was then damaged in transit to the Philadelphia airport by an independent
carrier. The additional repair work on that boom has been completed and the
boom
is awaiting delivery back to the airport. The carrier had initially undertaken
that such further repair work would be at its expense, though the carrier has
not yet approved the final expense of such repair work.
Global
has been named as a defendant in two legal actions arising from the February
2005 boom collapse at the Philadelphia airport. In the first, U.S.
Airways vs. Elliott Equipment Company, et al.,
which
is pending in United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania, U.S. Airways initiated an action on April 7, 2006 against Global
and its subcontractor seeking to recover approximately $2.9 million,
representing the alleged cost to repair of the damaged Airbus A330 aircraft
and
loss of use of the aircraft while it was being repaired. This matter is in
the
initial stage of discovery. In the second action, Emerson
vs. Elliott Equipment Company, et al.,
pending
in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, the boom operator is seeking
to recover unspecified damages from Global and its subcontractor for injuries
arising from the collapse of the boom. This matter was initiated on October
21,
2005 and is scheduled for trial in November 2007. The Company understands that
the boom operator has recovered from his injuries and has returned to fulltime
work. Global maintains product liability insurance in excess of the amount
of
the recoveries claimed above and is being defended in both of these matters
by
its product liability insurance carrier. Global’s insurance coverage does not
extend to the costs incurred by Global to examine and repair the other 11 booms
at the Philadelphia airport.
On
August
4, 2005, Global commenced litigation in the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia
County, Pennsylvania against Glazer Enterprises, Inc. t/a Elliott Equipment
Company, Global’s subcontractor that designed, fabricated and warrantied the
booms at the Philadelphia airport, seeking to recover approximately $905,000
in
costs incurred by Global in connection with repairing the 11 booms and any
damages arising from the collapse of the boom in February 2005. That case has
been removed to federal court and is pending before United States District
Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and has been assigned to the same
judge
before whom the U.S. Airways litigation is pending against Global. This matter
is in the initial stage of discovery. The Company cannot provide assurance
that
it will be able to recover its repair expenses, or otherwise be successful,
in
this action.
The
Company is currently involved in certain personal injury and environmental
matters, which involve pending or threatened lawsuits. Management believes
the
results of these pending or threatened lawsuits will not have a material adverse
effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial
position.
Item
6.
Exhibits
(a)
Exhibits
No. Description
3.1
|
Restated
Certificate of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q for the
period ended September 30, 2001
|
|
3.2
|
By-laws
of the Company, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2
of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 1996
|
|
4.1
|
Specimen
Common Stock Certificate, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 1994
|
|
10.1
|
Lease
Agreement dated June 16, 2006 between Little Mountain Airport Associates,
Inc. and Mountain Air Cargo, Inc.
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Walter Clark
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of John J. Gioffre
|
|
32.1
|
Section
1350 Certification
|
21
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf
by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
AIR
T,
INC.
By:
/s/
Walter Clark
Walter
Clark,
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer)
Date:
August 3, 2006
By:
/s/
John J. Gioffre
John
J.
Gioffre, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
Date:
August 3, 2006
22
AIR
T,
INC.
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Exhibit
Number Document
10.1
|
Lease
Agreement dated June 16, 2006 between Little Mountain Airport Associates,
Inc. and Mountain Air Cargo, Inc.
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Walter Clark
|
31.2
|
Certification
of John J. Gioffre
|
32.1
|
Section
1350 Certification
|
23