ALBIREO PHARMA, INC. - Quarter Report: 2009 December (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2009
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to . |
Commission File Number 001-33451
BIODEL INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
90-0136863 (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
100 Saw Mill Road Danbury, Connecticut (Address of principal executive offices) |
06810 (Zip code) |
(203) 796-5000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former Name, Former Address, and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). o Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). o Yes þ No
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of the issuers common stock as of the latest practicable
date: As of January 29, 2009 there were 23,883,612 shares of the registrants common stock
outstanding.
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Condensed Financial Statements.
Biodel Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(A Development Stage Company)
Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2009 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 54,640 | $ | 39,551 | ||||
Taxes receivable |
752 | 759 | ||||||
Other receivables |
| 1,406 | ||||||
Prepaid and other assets |
482 | 1,030 | ||||||
Total current assets |
55,874 | 42,746 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
3,695 | 3,490 | ||||||
Intellectual property, net |
56 | 55 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 59,625 | $ | 46,291 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 1,007 | $ | 1,613 | ||||
Accrued expenses: |
||||||||
Clinical trial expenses |
5,647 | 1,288 | ||||||
Regulatory |
359 | 1,214 | ||||||
Payroll and related |
1,117 | 614 | ||||||
Accounting and legal fees |
325 | 292 | ||||||
Severance |
183 | 96 | ||||||
Other |
284 | 199 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
165 | 155 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
9,087 | 5,471 | ||||||
Commitments |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized, none outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 23,803,672 and
23,883,612 issued and outstanding |
238 | 239 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
176,764 | 178,193 | ||||||
Deficit accumulated during the development stage |
(126,464 | ) | (137,612 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
50,538 | 40,820 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 59,625 | $ | 46,291 | ||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
1
Table of Contents
Biodel Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
December 3, | ||||||||||||
2003 | ||||||||||||
Three months ended | (inception) to | |||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2009 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||
Research and development |
8,035 | 8,754 | 98,805 | |||||||||
General and administrative |
2,281 | 2,417 | 39,062 | |||||||||
Total operating expenses |
10,316 | 11,171 | 137,867 | |||||||||
Other (income) and expense: |
||||||||||||
Interest and other income |
(242 | ) | (5 | ) | (5,494 | ) | ||||||
Interest expense |
| | 78 | |||||||||
Loss on settlement of debt |
| | 627 | |||||||||
Operating loss before tax benefit |
(10,074 | ) | (11,166 | ) | (133,078 | ) | ||||||
Tax benefit |
(50 | ) | (18 | ) | (526 | ) | ||||||
Net loss |
(10,024 | ) | (11,148 | ) | (132,552 | ) | ||||||
Charge for accretion of beneficial conversion rights |
| | (603 | ) | ||||||||
Deemed dividend warrants |
| | (4,457 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss applicable to common stockholders |
$ | (10,024 | ) | $ | (11,148 | ) | $ | (137,612 | ) | |||
Net loss per share basic and diluted |
$ | (0.42 | ) | $ | (0.47 | ) | ||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding basic and diluted |
23,706,148 | 23,848,855 | ||||||||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
Biodel Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Statements of Stockholders Equity
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Statements of Stockholders Equity
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Deficit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Series A Preferred stock | Series B Preferred stock | Additional | Other | During the | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$01 Par Value | $.01 Par Value | $.01 Par Value | Paid in | Comprehensive | Development | Stockholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Capital | Income (loss) | Stage | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued
to employees |
732,504 | $ | 7 | | $ | | | $ | | $ | (7 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
January 2004
Proceeds from sale
of common stock |
4,581,240 | 46 | | | | | 1,308 | | | 1,354 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | | | (774 | ) | (774 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, September
30, 2004 |
5,313,744 | 53 | | | | | 1,301 | | (774 | ) | 580 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
stockholder
contributions |
| | | | | | 514 | | | 514 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based
compensation |
| | | | | | 353 | | | 353 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued to
employees and
directors for
services |
42,656 | 1 | | | | | 60 | | | 61 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
July 2005 Private
placement Sale
of Series A
preferred stock,
net of issuance
costs of $379 |
| | 569,000 | 6 | | | 2,460 | | | 2,466 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Founders
compensation
contributed to
capital |
| | | | | | 63 | | | 63 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | | | | (3,383 | ) | (3,383 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, September
30, 2005 |
5,356,400 | 54 | 569,000 | 6 | | | 4,751 | | (4,157 | ) | 654 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based
compensation |
| | | | | | 1,132 | | | 1,132 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
July 2006 Private
placement Sale
of Series B
preferred stock,
net of issuance
costs of $1,795 |
| | | | 5,380,711 | 54 | 19,351 | | | 19,405 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
July 2006 Series
B preferred stock
units issued July
2006 to settle debt |
| | | | 817,468 | 8 | 3,194 | | | 3,202 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued to
employees and
directors for
services |
4,030 | | | | | | 23 | | | 23 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accretion of fair
value of beneficial
conversion charge |
| | | | | | 603 | | (603 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | | | | (8,068 | ) | (8,068 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, September
30, 2006 |
5,360,430 | 54 | 569,000 | 6 | 6,198,179 | 62 | 29,054 | | (12,828 | ) | 16,348 |
3
Table of Contents
Biodel Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Statements of Stockholders Equity
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Statements of Stockholders Equity
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Deficit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Series A Preferred stock | Series B Preferred stock | Additional | Other | During the | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$01 Par Value | $.01 Par Value | $.01 Par Value | Paid in | Comprehensive | Development | Stockholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Capital | Income (loss) | Stage | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
May 2007
Proceeds from sale
of common stock |
5,750,000 | 58 | | | | | 78,697 | | | 78,755 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conversion of
preferred stock on
May 16, 2007 |
6,407,008 | 64 | (569,000 | ) | (6 | ) | (6,198,179 | ) | (62 | ) | 4 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based
compensation |
| | | | | | 4,224 | | | 4,224 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued to
employees,
non-employees and
directors for
services |
2,949 | | | | | | 16 | | | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options
exercised |
3,542 | | | | | | 5 | | | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 2007 Warrants
exercised |
2,636,907 | 26 | | | | | 397 | | | 423 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deemed dividend
warrants |
| | | | | | 4,457 | | (4,457 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | | | | (22,548 | ) | (22,548 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
September 30, 2007 |
20,160,836 | 202 | | | | | 116,854 | | (39,833 | ) | 77,223 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale
of common stock |
3,260,000 | 32 | | | | | 46,785 | | | 46,817 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of
restricted stock |
9,714 | | | | | | 172 | | | 172 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based
compensation |
| | | | | | 6,503 | | | 6,503 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options
exercised |
174,410 | 1 | | | | | 901 | | | 902 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warrants exercised |
79,210 | 1 | | | | | 111 | | | 112 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized
(loss) on
Marketable
Securities |
| | | | | | | (62 | ) | | (62 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale
of stock ESPP |
14,388 | 1 | | | | | 180 | | | 181 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | | | | (43,361 | ) | (43,361 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, September
30, 2008 |
23,698,558 | 237 | | $ | | | | 171,506 | (62 | ) | $ | (83,194 | ) | 88,487 |
4
Table of Contents
Biodel Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Statements of Stockholders Equity
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Statements of Stockholders Equity
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Deficit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Series A Preferred stock | Series B Preferred stock | Additional | Other | During the | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$01 Par Value | $.01 Par Value | $.01 Par Value | Paid in | Comprehensive | Development | Stockholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Capital | Income (loss) | Stage | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based
compensation |
| | | | | | 5,064 | | | 5,064 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options
exercised |
17,661 | | | | | | 25 | | | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized gain
on Marketable
Securities |
| | | | | | | 62 | | 62 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale
of stock ESPP |
87,453 | 1 | | | | | 169 | | | 170 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
(43,270 | ) | (43,270 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, September
30, 2009 |
23,803,672 | 238 | | | | | 176,764 | | (126,464 | ) | 50,538 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based
compensation |
| | | | | | 1,275 | | | 1,275 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale
of stock ESPP |
79,940 | 1 | | | | | 154 | | | 155 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | | | | | (11,148 | ) | (11,148 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December
31, 2009
(unaudited) |
23,883,612 | $ | 239 | | $ | | | $ | | $ | 178,193 | $ | | $ | (137,612 | ) | $ | (40,820 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
Biodel Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
December 3, | ||||||||||||
2003 | ||||||||||||
Three months ended | (inception) to | |||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2009 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (10,024 | ) | $ | (11,148 | ) | $ | (132,552 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
209 | 245 | 2,394 | |||||||||
Founders compensation contributed to capital |
| | 271 | |||||||||
Share-based compensation for employees and directors |
1,148 | 1,301 | 16,505 | |||||||||
Share-based compensation for non-employees |
78 | (26 | ) | 2,299 | ||||||||
Loss on settlement of debt |
| | 627 | |||||||||
Write-off of loan to related party |
| | 41 | |||||||||
Write-off of capitalized patent expense |
| | 208 | |||||||||
(Increase) decrease in: |
||||||||||||
Income tax receivable |
3 | (7 | ) | (759 | ) | |||||||
Other receivables |
| (1,406 | ) | (1,406 | ) | |||||||
Prepaid expenses |
338 | (548 | ) | (1,030 | ) | |||||||
Increase (decrease) in: |
||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
(743 | ) | 606 | 1,613 | ||||||||
Income taxes payable |
64 | (10 | ) | 155 | ||||||||
Accrued expenses |
(392 | ) | (4,211 | ) | 3,922 | |||||||
Total adjustments |
705 | (4,056 | ) | 24,840 | ||||||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
(9,319 | ) | (15,204 | ) | (107,712 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment |
(25 | ) | (40 | ) | (5,849 | ) | ||||||
Purchase of marketable securities |
| | (25,614 | ) | ||||||||
Sale of marketable securities |
7,536 | | 25,614 | |||||||||
Acquisition of intellectual property |
| | (298 | ) | ||||||||
Loan to related party |
| | (41 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
7,511 | (40 | ) | (6,188 | ) | |||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||
Options exercised |
| | 932 | |||||||||
Warrants exercised |
| | 535 | |||||||||
Employee stock purchase plan |
26 | 155 | 506 | |||||||||
Deferred public offering costs |
| | (1,458 | ) | ||||||||
Stockholder contribution |
| | 1,660 | |||||||||
Net proceeds from sale of Series A preferred stock |
| | 2,466 | |||||||||
Net proceeds from sale of common stock |
| | 127,030 | |||||||||
Proceeds from bridge financing |
| | 2,575 | |||||||||
Net proceeds from sale of Series B preferred stock |
| | 19,205 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
26 | 155 | 153,451 | |||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(1,782 | ) | (15,089 | ) | 39,551 | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
64,731 | 54,640 | | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 62,949 | $ | 39,551 | $ | 39,551 | ||||||
6
Table of Contents
Biodel Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
(A Development Stage Company)
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
December 3, | ||||||||||||
2003 | ||||||||||||
Three months ended | (inception) to | |||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2009 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
||||||||||||
Cash paid for interest and income taxes was: |
||||||||||||
Interest |
$ | | $ | | $ | 9 | ||||||
Income taxes |
45 | | 246 | |||||||||
Non-cash financing and investing activities: |
||||||||||||
Settlement of debt with Series B preferred stock |
$ | | $ | | $ | 3,202 | ||||||
Accrued expenses settled with Series B preferred stock |
| | 150 | |||||||||
Deemed dividend warrants |
| | 4,457 | |||||||||
Accretion of fair value of beneficial charge on preferred stock |
| | 603 | |||||||||
Conversion of convertible preferred stock to common stock |
| | 68 | |||||||||
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
Biodel Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
1. Business and Basis of Presentation
Business
Biodel Inc. (Biodel or the Company, and formerly Global Positioning Group Ltd.) is a
development stage specialty pharmaceutical company located in Danbury, Connecticut. The Company was
incorporated in the State of Delaware on December 3, 2003 and commenced operations in January 2004.
The Company is focused on the development and commercialization of innovative treatments for
diabetes. The Company develops product candidates by applying its proprietary formulation
technologies to existing drugs in order to improve their therapeutic results. The Companys initial
development efforts are focused on peptide hormones. The Companys most advanced product candidate,
VIAject®, has been studied in two pivotal Phase 3 clinical trials for the treatment of patients
with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. Earlier stage product candidates include VIAtab®, a sublingual
tablet formulation of insulin, a line of adjustable basal insulins, a smart basal insulin and a
stabilized formula of glucagon. The Company has developed all of its product candidates utilizing
its proprietary VIAdel® technology that allows the Company to study the interaction between peptide
hormones and small molecules.
Basis of Presentation
The financial statements have been prepared by the Company and are unaudited. In the opinion
of management, the Company has made all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals)
necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations for the interim
periods presented. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the annual
financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (US GAAP) have been condensed or omitted. These condensed financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the September 30, 2009 audited financial statements
and accompanying notes included in the 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on December 14, 2009. The results of operations for the three months ended
December 31, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year or any
other interim period.
The Company is in the development stage, as defined by Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
ASC 915 (prior authoritative literature: Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 7),
Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage Enterprises, as its primary activities since
incorporation have been establishing its facilities, recruiting personnel, conducting research and
development, business development, business and financial planning and raising capital.
Recently Adopted and Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Fair Value Measurement
Effective October 1, 2009, the Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2009-5 Fair Value and
Disclosures (Topic 820) Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value (ASU 2009-5). ASU 2009-5 provides
amendments to Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures-Overall, for the fair value
measurement of liabilities. ASU 2009-5 clarifies that in circumstances in which a quoted price in
an active market for the identical liability is not available; a reporting entity is required to
measure fair value. The adoption of this accounting pronouncement did not have a material effect on
the Companys financial statements.
Share-based Compensation
In June 2008 the FASB issued ASC 260-10-55 Earnings Per Share Overall (formerly Financial
Statement Position Emerging Issues Task Force 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in
Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities) (ASC 260-10-55). ASC 260-10-55
provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends
or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included
in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. ASC 260-10-55 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those
years. Upon adoption, a company is required to retrospectively adjust its earnings per share data
(including any amounts related to interim periods, summaries of earnings and selected financial
data) to conform to the provisions of ASC 260-10-55. Given that the holder of Restricted Stock
Unit awards (RSUs) will only receive dividends or dividend equivalents on RSUs that have vested
prior to the Company declaring dividends as well as forfeiting their rights to receive dividends or
dividend equivalents on any unvested portion, the Company determined that the RSUs are
non-participating securities and therefore are not subject to ASC 260-10-55.
8
Table of Contents
Biodel Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
Subsequent Events
On June 30, 2009, the Company adopted FASB ASC 855 (ASC 855) Subsequent Events (formerly
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 165, Subsequent Events). ASC 855 establishes
general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet
date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. Specifically, ASC
855 defines: (1) the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting
entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or
disclosure in the financial statements, (2) the circumstances under which an entity should
recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial
statements, and (3) the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that
occurred after the balance sheet date. Management has reviewed events occurring through February 5,
2010, the date the financial statements were issued, and included subsequent events that occurred
and were properly disclosed.
2. Pre-Launch Inventory
Inventory costs associated with products that have not yet received regulatory approval are
capitalized if the Company believes there is probable future commercial use and future economic
benefit. If the probability of future commercial use and future economic benefit cannot be
reasonably determined, then costs associated with pre-launch inventory that has not yet received
regulatory approval are expensed as research and development expense during the period the costs
are incurred. For the quarter ended December 31, 2009, the Company expensed $1.7 million of costs
associated with the purchase of recombinant human insulin, as research and development expense
after it passed quality control inspection by the Company and transfer of title occurred. The
Company submitted a new drug application to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for VIAject® in
December 2009. Until the Company can determine the probability of VIAject® receiving regulatory
approval, costs associated with the purchase of recombinant human insulin will continue to be
expensed as research and development.
3. Share-Based Compensation
The Company recognizes stock-based compensation arising from compensatory stock-based
transactions using the fair value at the grant date of the award. Determining the fair value of
stock-based awards at the grant date requires judgment. The Company uses an option-pricing model
(Black-Scholes pricing model) to assist in the calculation of fair value. Due to its limited
history, the Company uses the calculated value method which relies on comparable company
historical volatility and uses the average of (i) the weighted average vesting period and (ii) the
contractual life of the option, or eight years, as the estimated term of the option. The Company
bases its estimates of expected volatility on the median historical volatility of a group of
publicly traded companies that it believes are comparable to the Company based on the line of
business, stage of development, size and financial leverage.
The risk free rate of interest for periods within the contractual life of the stock option
award is based on the yield of U.S. Treasury strips on the date the award is granted with a
maturity similar to the expected term of the award. The Company estimates forfeitures based on
actual forfeitures during its limited history. Additionally, the Company has assumed that dividends
will not be paid.
Based on historical experience of option cancellations, the Company has estimated an
annualized forfeiture rate of 9% for employee and director options. Forfeiture rates will be
adjusted over the requisite service period when actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to
differ, from the estimate.
Determining the fair value of restricted stock units and total stock-based compensation
expenses, the Company uses the fair market value of the Companys stock on the award date of grant.
For stock options granted to non-employees, the Company measures fair value of the equity
instruments utilizing the Black-Scholes model, if that value is more reliably measurable than the
fair value of the consideration or service received. The fair value of these instruments are
periodically revalued as the options vest, and are recognized as expense over the related period of
service or vesting period, whichever is longer. The total compensation charge or credit for options
granted to non-employees for the three months ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 was $78 and $(26),
respectively.
The Company expenses ratably over the vesting period the cost of the stock options granted to
employees and directors. The total compensation charge for the three months ended December 31, 2008
and 2009 was $1,148 and $1,280, respectively. At December 31, 2009, the total compensation charge
related to non-vested options to employees and directors and non-employee consultants not yet
recognized was $8,903 which will be recognized over the remaining vesting periods, up to the next
four years, assuming the employees complete their service period for vesting of the options.
9
Table of Contents
Biodel Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
The following table summarizes the stock option activity during the three months ended
December 31, 2009:
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Average | |||||||||||||||
Average | Remaining | |||||||||||||||
Exercise | Contractual | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||
Number | Price | Life in Years | Intrinsic Value | |||||||||||||
Outstanding options, September 30, 2009 |
3,407,633 | $ | 11.81 | $ | 1,538 | |||||||||||
Granted |
412,500 | 3.71 | $ | 194 | ||||||||||||
Forfeited, expired |
18,250 | 16.88 | | |||||||||||||
Outstanding options, December 31, 2009 |
3,801,883 | $ | 10.91 | 7 | $ | 1,732 | ||||||||||
Exercisable options, December 31, 2009 |
2,378,664 | $ | 10.66 | 5 | $ | 1,224 | ||||||||||
The Black-Scholes pricing model assumptions for the three months ended December 31, 2008
and 2009 are determined as discussed below:
December 31, | ||||||||
2008 | 2009 | |||||||
Expected life (in years) |
5.25 | 5.25 | ||||||
Expected volatility |
59 - 67 | % | 64-76 | % | ||||
Expected dividend yield |
0 | % | 0 | % | ||||
Risk-free interest rate |
1.00 -1.87 | % | 1.38-2.69 | % | ||||
Weighted average grant date fair value |
$ | 1.23 | $ | 3.71 |
Restricted Stock Units
In the quarter ended December 31, 2009, the Company granted restricted stock units to
executive officers and employees pursuant to the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan. There is no direct
cost to the recipients of the restricted stock units, except for any applicable taxes. Each
restricted stock unit represents one share of common stock and vests annually over four years.
Each year following the annual vesting date, between January 1st and March
15th, the Company will issue common stock for each vested restricted stock unit. During
the vesting period, the restricted stock units cannot be transferred and the grantee has no voting
rights. If the Company declares a dividend, restricted stock unit recipients will receive payment
based upon the percentage of RSUs that have vested prior to the date of declaration. The costs of
the awards, determined as the fair value of the shares on the grant date, is expensed ratably over
the vesting period.
Based on historical experience of option cancellations, the Company has estimated an
annualized forfeiture rate of 9% for employee RSUs. Forfeiture rates will be adjusted over the
requisite service period when actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from the
estimate.
The stock-based compensation expense associated with the restricted stock units have been
recorded in the statement of operations and in additional paid-in-capital on the balance sheets is
as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||
2008 | 2009 | |||||||
Stock compensation expense RSUs |
$ | | $ | 21 | ||||
10
Table of Contents
Biodel Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
At December 31, 2009, there was $966 of total unrecognized stock-based compensation
expense related to restricted stock unit awards granted under the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan. This
expense is expected to be recognized over the remaining vesting periods up to four years.
The following table summarizes restricted stock unit activity from October 1, 2009 through
December 31, 2009:
Weighted Average | ||||||||
Grant-Date | ||||||||
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
Nonvested balance at October 1, 2009 |
| $ | | |||||
Changes during the period |
||||||||
Shares granted |
250,000 | $ | 3.95 | |||||
Shares vested |
| | ||||||
Shares forfeited or expired |
| | ||||||
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2009 |
250,000 | $ | 3.95 | |||||
2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Companys 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the Purchase Plan) was adopted by its Board
of Directors and approved by its stockholders on March 20, 2007. The Purchase Plan became effective
upon the closing of the Companys initial public offering. The Purchase Plan is intended to qualify
as an employee stock purchase plan within the meaning of Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code.
Under the Purchase Plan, eligible employees may contribute up to 15% of their eligible earnings for
the period of that offering withheld for the purchase of common stock under the Purchase Plan. The
employees purchase price is equal to the lower of: 85% of the fair market value per share on the
start date of the offering period in which the employee is enrolled or 85% of the fair market value
per share on the semi-annual purchase date. The Purchase Plan imposes a limitation upon a
participants right to acquire common stock if immediately after the purchase the employee would
own 5% or more of the total combined voting power or value of the Companys common stock or of any
of its affiliates. The Purchase Plan provides for an automatic rollover when the purchase price for
a new offering period is lower than previously established purchase price(s). The Purchase Plan
also provides for a one-time election that allows an employee the opportunity to enroll into a new
offering period when the new offering is higher than their current offering price. This election
must be made within 30 days from the start of a new offering period. Offering periods are
twenty-seven months in length. The compensation cost in connection with the Purchase Plan for the
three months ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 were $35 and $172, respectively.
An aggregate of 1,500,000 shares of common stock are reserved for issuance pursuant to
purchase rights to be granted to the Companys eligible employees under the Purchase Plan. The
Purchase Plan shares are replenished annually on the first day of each calendar year by virtue of
an evergreen provision. The provision allows for share replenishment equal to the lesser of 1% of
the total number of shares of common stock outstanding on that date or 100,000 shares. As of
December 31, 2009, a total of 1,318,219 shares were reserved and available for issuance under the
Purchase Plan. As of December 31, 2009, the Company issued 181,781 shares under the Purchase Plan.
4. Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB Codification Topic 740-10-25 (ASC
740-10-25), Accounting for Income Taxes. Under ASC 740-10-25, deferred tax assets and liabilities
are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to
taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or
settled. Under ASC 740-10-25, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax
rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
As of the three months ended December 31, 2009, a liability adjustment of $1 was recorded. The
adjustment relates to the uncertainty of available tax credits. The Company did not have any
amounts of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect its effective tax rate. The
liability does not include interest or penalties based on the nature of the liability. The Company
plans to treat any future interest or penalties as operating expense.
The Company files U.S. federal and state tax returns and has determined that its major tax
jurisdictions are the United States and Connecticut. The tax years ended in 2004 through 2008
remain open and subject to examination by the appropriate governmental agencies in the United
States and Connecticut.
11
Table of Contents
Biodel Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
The Companys effective tax rate for the three months ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, was 1%
and 0%, respectively, and differs from the federal statutory rate of 34% primarily due to the
effects of state income taxes and valuation allowance.
5. Net Loss per Share
Basic and diluted net loss per share has been calculated by dividing net loss applicable to
common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
All potentially dilutive common shares have been excluded from the calculation of weighted average
common shares outstanding, as their inclusion would be antidilutive.
The amount of options and warrants excluded are as follows:
Three months ended | ||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||
2008 | 2009 | |||||||
Common shares underlying warrants for Series A Preferred Stock |
118,815 | 118,815 | ||||||
Stock options |
3,448,145 | 3,801,883 | ||||||
Restricted stock units |
| 250,000 |
6. Commitments
Former General Counsel Severance Agreement
Effective January 1, 2009, R. Timmis Ware, the Companys former General Counsel and Secretary,
resigned from all his positions with the Company. Pursuant to the Companys severance agreement
with Mr. Ware, Mr. Ware will receive a bonus, continuation of salary and certain benefits until
June 30, 2010. Furthermore, the agreement permits for the acceleration of the vesting of options to
purchase 170,445 shares of common stock at exercise prices between $1.41 through $18.16 that remain
exercisable through the original expiration date. The charge of approximately $277 for the lump sum
payment, salary and benefit continuation for eighteen months and option acceleration modification
charge of approximately $100 was recorded in January 2009. As of December 31, 2009 the Company has
paid $185 of the $277 obligation, which leaves $92 as a short term obligation.
Leases
As of December 31, 2009, the Company leased three facilities in Danbury, Connecticut with
Mulvaney Properties, LLC, which is controlled by a non-affiliated stockholder of the Company.
The Company entered into its first lease for laboratory space in February 2004, which was
subsequently renewed in January 2010 for an additional three years. The lease will expire in
January 2013. This lease provides for annual basic lease payments of $64, plus operating expenses.
In July 2007 the Company entered into a second lease for its corporate office, which was
subsequently amended in October 2007. The October 2007 amendment increased the term from five years
to seven years beginning on August 1, 2007 and ending on July 31, 2014. The renewal option was also
amended from a five year to a seven year term. This lease provides for annual basic lease payments
of $357, plus operating expenses.
In December 2008, the Company entered into a third lease agreement for additional office space
adjacent to its laboratory space, which was subsequently renewed in January 2010 for an additional
three years. The Company has agreed to use the leased premises only for offices, laboratories,
research, development and light manufacturing. This lease provides for annual basic lease payments
of $29, plus operating expenses.
Lease expense for the three months ended December 2008 and 2009 was $144, and $149,
respectively.
7. Subsequent Event
In January 2010, the Company renewed two of the lease agreements with Mulvaney Properties LLC
to lease two facilities located in Danbury, Connecticut for three years beginning February 1, 2010
until January 31, 2013, at a total lease and operating cost of approximately $417.
12
Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, that involve substantial risks and
uncertainties. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q regarding our strategy, future operations, future financial position,
future revenues, projected costs, prospects, plans and objectives of management are forward-looking
statements. The words anticipates, believes, could, estimates, expects, intends, may,
plans, potential, predicts, projects, should, will, would and similar expressions are
intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements
contain these identifying words.
Our forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are subject to a number
of known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance or
achievements to differ materially from those described or implied in the forward-looking
statements, including:
| our ability to secure approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, for our product candidates under Section 505(b)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, or FFDCA; | ||
| the length of time that will elapse before our NDA for VIAject® is fully reviewed by the FDA; | ||
| our ability to secure approval by the FDA for VIAject® without conducting additional pivotal clinical trials; | ||
| our ability to market, commercialize and achieve market acceptance for VIAject® ; | ||
| the progress, timing or success of our product candidates, particularly VIAject®, and that of our research, development and clinical programs, including any resulting data analyses; | ||
| our ability to enter into collaboration arrangements for the commercialization of our product candidates and the success or failure of any such collaborations into which we enter, or our ability to commercialize our product candidates ourselves; | ||
| our ability to enforce our patent for VIAject® and our ability to secure additional patents for VIAject® and for our other product candidates; | ||
| our ability to protect our intellectual property and operate our business without infringing upon the intellectual property rights of others; | ||
| the degree of clinical utility of our products; | ||
| the ability of our major suppliers, including suppliers of insulin, to produce our product or products in our final dosage form; | ||
| our commercialization, marketing and manufacturing capabilities and strategies; and | ||
| our ability to accurately estimate anticipated operating losses, future revenues, capital requirements and our needs for additional financing. |
We may not actually achieve the plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in our
forward-looking statements, and you should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking
statements. Actual results or events could differ materially from the plans, intentions and
expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements we make. We have included important
factors in the cautionary statements included in this Quarterly Report, particularly in Part II -
Item 1A Risk Factors of this Quarterly Report that could cause actual results or events to differ
materially from the forward-looking statements that we make.
You should read this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the documents that we have filed as
exhibits hereto with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different
from what we expect. It is routine for internal projections and expectations to change as the year,
or each quarter in the year, progresses, and therefore it should be clearly understood that the
internal projections and beliefs upon which we base our expectations are made as of the date of
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and may change prior to the end of each quarter or the year.
While we may elect to update forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we do not
undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
13
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results
of operations together with our financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q . Some of the information contained in this discussion and
analysis or set forth elsewhere in this Form 10-Q , including information with respect to our plans
and strategy for our business and related financing, includes forward-looking statements that
involve risks and uncertainties. You should read the Risk Factors section of this Form 10-Q (see
Part II-Item 1A below) for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements
contained in the following discussion and analysis.
Overview
We are a specialty biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization
of innovative treatments for endocrine disorders such as diabetes, which may be safer, more
effective and more convenient for patients. We develop our product candidates by applying our
proprietary formulation technologies to existing drugs in order to improve their therapeutic
profiles. Our initial development efforts are focused on peptide hormones. Our most advanced
product candidate, VIAject®, has been studied in two pivotal Phase 3 clinical trials for the
treatment of patients with Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. Earlier stage product candidates include
VIAtab, a sublingual tablet formulation of insulin, a line of adjustable basal insulins, a smart
insulin and a stabilized formulation of glucagon.
VIAject® is our proprietary injectable formulation of recombinant human insulin designed to be
absorbed into the blood faster than the currently marketed rapid-acting insulin analogs. We have
completed two pivotal Phase 3 clinical trials of VIAject®, one in patients with Type 1 diabetes and
the other in patients with Type 2 diabetes. In both clinical trials we compared VIAject® to Humulin
® R, a form of recombinant human insulin. We believe VIAject® can improve the management of blood
glucose levels in patients with diabetes by more closely mimicking the natural first-phase insulin
release that healthy individuals experience at mealtime. Patients in both clinical trials were
treated for a period of six months.
In October 2009 we executed a letter of intent to purchase a disposable insulin pen designed
by Wockhardt Ltd. for use with VIAject® . We intend to submit this pen to the FDA for review at a
later date after completing certain modifications that we believe will improve its commercial
performance.
In December 2009, we submitted an NDA to the FDA under section 505(b)(2) of the FFDCA for
clearance to market VIAject® as a treatment for diabetes. The NDA includes results from
pharmacokinetic and standardized meal studies, two pivotal 6 month Phase 3 clinical trials of
VIAject® in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, as well as interim results from the long-term
18 month safety extension trials for patients who completed the pivotal Phase 3 clinical trials.
The data from these studies consistently document the safety and efficacy of VIAject®. We are
seeking approval for a 100 IU/cc liquid formulation of VIAject® that is bioequivalent to the
two-part 25 IU/cc lyophilized powder formulation of VIAject® that was used in our pivotal Phase 3
clinical trials.
In fiscal year 2010 we plan to conduct additional clinical trials designed to generate data to
enhance VIAjects® potential commercial success. We do not anticipate incurring significant
expenditures on the development of our earlier stage product candidates in fiscal year 2010 unless
significant incremental resources become available. However, in addition to VIAtab, we believe
that the following product candidates have recently shown promise in early-stage laboratory and
clinical work, and we therefore intend to generate proof of concept data for these programs in
animal models and small human clinical trials:
| A line of adjustable basal insulins with durations that can be tailored to individual patients: Current basal insulins have a duration of activity that varies patient by patient; what may be an adequate duration for one patient may be too short or too long in another. We are developing a technology that may shorten or lengthen the duration of a basal insulin to best suit the individual needs of patients. |
| A smart basal insulin: We are developing a basal insulin formulation that may sufficiently react to a patients blood glucose levels to meaningfully lessen the risk of hyper or hypoglycemia compared to currently available basal insulin products, although we anticipate that prandial insulin injections would still be necessary in many instances. |
| Stabilized glucagon: Glucagon is a protein released by the pancreas that signals the liver to release glucose. Glucagon is currently approved and marketed for use as a rescue therapy in cases where patients become severely hypoglycemic. It is an unstable protein and therefore must be stored lyophilized and reconstituted prior to use. We are developing a more stable formulation of glucagon that may allow it to be stored as a refrigerated liquid. Such a formulation may offer certain advantages in the rescue market and may also enable the development of a bi-hormonal pump, which might better mimic the normal function of the human pancreas. |
We are a development stage company. We were incorporated in December 2003 and commenced active
operations in January 2004. To date, we have generated no revenues and have incurred significant
losses. We have financed our operations and internal growth through our initial public offering in
May 2007 and follow-on offering in February 2008 and prior to that, private placements of
convertible preferred stock and other securities. We have devoted substantially all of our efforts
to research and development activities, including clinical trials. Our net loss applicable to
common stockholders was $11.1 million for the three months ended December 31, 2009. As of December
31, 2009, we had a deficit accumulated during the development stage of $137.6 million. The deficit
accumulated during the development stage is attributable primarily to our research and development
activities. Research and development and general and administrative expenses represent
approximately 72% and 28%, respectively, of the net loss that we have incurred since our inception.
We expect to continue to generate significant losses as we continue to develop our product
candidates.
14
Table of Contents
Financial Operations Overview
Revenues
To date, we have generated no revenues. We do not expect to begin generating any revenues
unless any of our product candidates receive marketing approval or if we receive payments in
connection with strategic collaborations that we may enter into for the commercialization of our
product candidates.
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses consist of the cost associated with our basic research
activities, as well as the costs associated with our drug development efforts, conducting
preclinical studies and clinical trials, manufacturing development efforts and activities related
to regulatory filings. Our research and development expenses consist of:
| external research and development expenses incurred under agreements with third-party contract research organizations and investigative sites, third-party manufacturing organizations and consultants; | ||
| employee-related expenses, which include salaries and benefits for the personnel involved in our preclinical and clinical drug development and manufacturing activities; and | ||
| facilities, depreciation and other allocated expenses, which include direct and allocated expenses for rent and maintenance of facilities, depreciation of leasehold improvements and equipment and laboratory and other supplies. |
While we have suspended significant expenditures on our earlier stage product candidates and
any enlargement of our laboratory facilities pending further development of our regulatory plans
for VIAject®, we expect to continue to incur significant operating losses for the next several
years as we:
| continue our clinical trial extension program for the pivotal Phase 3 clinical trials of VIAject®, which is designed to run through February 2010; | ||
| conduct additional clinical trials of VIAject® to support our commercialization efforts and, potentially, FDA approval; and | ||
| purchase recombinant human insulin and other materials to build commercial supply inventory for VIAject®. |
If we obtain regulatory approval for VIAject®, research and development expenses may increase
significantly as we prepare for the commercial launch of VIAject® and
reinvigorate development work on our early stage product candidates.
We have used our employee and infrastructure resources across multiple research projects,
including our drug development programs. To date, we have not tracked expenses related to our
product development activities on a program-by-program basis. Accordingly, we cannot reasonably
estimate the amount of research and development expenses that we incurred with respect to each of
our clinical and preclinical product candidates. However, substantially all of our research and
development expenses incurred to date are attributable to our VIAject® program.
The following table illustrates, for each period presented, our research and development costs
by nature of the cost.
December 3, 2003 | ||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | (Inception) to | |||||||||||
December 31, | December 31, | |||||||||||
2008 | 2009 | 2009 | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Research and development expenses: |
||||||||||||
Pre-clinical expenses |
$ | 957 | $ | 600 | $ | 12,853 | ||||||
Manufacturing expenses |
2,631 | 2,817 | 24,878 | |||||||||
Clinical/regulatory expenses |
4,447 | 5,337 | 61,074 | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 8,035 | $ | 8,754 | $ | 98,805 | ||||||
15
Table of Contents
The successful development of our product candidates is highly uncertain. At this time,
we cannot reasonably estimate or know the nature, specific timing and estimated costs of the
efforts that will be necessary to complete the remainder of the development of, or the period, if
any, in which material net cash inflows may commence from our product candidates. This is due to
the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with developing drugs, including the uncertainty
of:
| our ability to secure approval by the FDA for our product candidates under Section 505(b)(2) of the FFDCA; |
| our ability to wait the length of time that will elapse before our NDA is fully reviewed by the FDA; |
| the costs associated with preparing and submitting our Market Authorization Application (MAA) for VIAject® to the European Medicines Agency (EMEA); |
| our ability to market, commercialize and achieve market acceptance for product candidates, particularly VIAject® ; |
| our ability to secure approval by the FDA for VIAject® without conducting additional pivotal clinical trials; |
| the FDAs findings regarding data anomalies observed in India in our Phase 3 clinical trial of VIAject® for patients with Type 1 diabetes and the impact of those findings on the timing of a regulatory approval; |
| the size, endpoints and duration of additional clinical trials of VIAject® to support our commercialization efforts and, potentially, FDA approval; |
| the cost to fully develop the 100 IU/cc liquid formulation of VIAject® ; |
| our ability to establish that the 100 IU/cc liquid formulation of VIAject® is well-tolerated in chronic use; |
| the cost to develop an insulin pen program for use with VIAject® ; |
| the costs of pre-commercialization activities, including increased insulin purchases; |
| the costs associated with qualifying and obtaining regulatory approval of suppliers of insulin and manufacturers of our product candidates; |
| the costs of preparing, filing and prosecuting patent applications and maintaining, enforcing and defending intellectual property-related claims; |
| the emergence of competing technologies and products and other adverse market developments; and |
| our ability to establish and maintain collaborations and the terms and success of the collaborations, including the timing and amount of payments that we might receive from potential strategic collaborators. |
A change in the outcome of any of these variables with respect to the development of
VIAject® or our other product candidates could mean a significant change in
the costs and timing associated with product development. For example, if the FDA or other
regulatory authority were to require us to conduct an additional pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial of
VIAject®, we could be required to expend significant additional financial resources and time on the
completion of that clinical development program.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related expenses for
personnel, including stock-based compensation expenses, in our executive, legal, accounting,
finance and information technology functions. Other general and administrative expenses include
facility-related costs not otherwise allocated to research and development expense, travel
expenses, costs associated with industry conventions and professional fees, such as legal and
accounting fees and consulting costs.
We anticipate that our general and administrative expenses will not change significantly as we
focus our product development efforts on obtaining regulatory approval for VIAject®. Over the longer term, however, these expenses could increase as we approach the
commercial launch of VIAject®.
Pre-Launch Inventory
Inventory costs associated with products that have not yet received regulatory approval are
capitalized if we believe there is probable future commercial use and future economic benefit. If
the probability of future commercial use and future economic benefit cannot be reasonably
determined, then costs associated with pre-launch inventory that has not yet received regulatory
approval are expensed as research and development expense during the period the costs are incurred.
For the quarter ended December 31, 2009, the Company expensed $1.7 million of costs associated with
the purchase of recombinant human insulin, as research and development expense after it passed
quality control inspection by the Company and transfer of title occurred. The Company submitted the
NDA for VIAject® in December 2009. Until the Company can determine the
probability of VIAject® receiving regulatory approval, costs associated with
the purchase of recombinant human insulin will continue to be expensed as research and development.
Restricted Stock Units
In the quarter ended December 31, 2009, we granted restricted stock units to executive
officers and employees pursuant to the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan. There is no direct cost to the
recipients of the restricted stock units, except for any applicable personal taxes. Each
restricted
16
Table of Contents
stock unit represents one share of common stock and annually vests ratably over four years.
Each year following the annual vesting date, between January 1st and March
15th, we will issue common stock for each vested restricted stock unit. During the
vesting period, the restricted stock units cannot be transferred and the grantee has no voting
rights. If the Company declares a dividend, restricted stock unit recipients will receive payment
based upon the percentage of RSUs that have vested prior to the date of declaration. The costs of
the awards, determined as the fair value of the shares on the grant date, is expensed ratably over
the vesting period.
Interest Income
Due to the uncertainty in the credit and financial markets, along with our securing FDA
approval of VIAject®, we have modified our investment strategy and primarily invested in certain
marketable securities, which consists primarily of treasury securities. The focus on preserving
cash and investing in stable securities generated lower returns during the quarter ended December
31, 2009. During the period from when we filed our NDA until the FDA finishes its review of our
NDA, we intend to maintain this conservative strategy until the credit and financial markets
improve and become more stable.
Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates
Our managements discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations
are based on our unaudited financial statements, that have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial
statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements, as well as the reported expenses during the reporting periods. On an ongoing
basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions. We base our estimates on historical experience
and on various assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of
which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that
are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under
different assumptions or conditions.
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to our audited financial
statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009
and in the notes to our financial statements included in this Form 10-Q. We believe that our
accounting policies relating to preclinical study and clinical trial accruals, stock-based
compensation and income taxes are the most critical to aid you in fully understanding and
evaluating our financial condition and results of operations. These policies are described under
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. There have been no material changes to such
policies since the filing of such Annual Report.
Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Fair Value Measurement
Effective October 1, 2009, we adopted the provisions of ASU 2009-5 Fair Value and Disclosures
(Topic 820) Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value (ASU 2009-5). ASU 2009-5 provides amendments to
Subtopic 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures-Overall, for the fair value measurement of
liabilities. ASU 2009-5 clarifies that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active
market for the identical liability is not available; a reporting entity is required to measure fair
value. The adoption of this accounting pronouncement did not have a material effect on our
financial statements.
Share-based Compensation
In June 2008 the FASB issued ASC 260-10-55 Earnings for Share-Overall (formerly Financial
Statement Position Emerging Issues Task Force 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in
Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities) (ASC 260-10-55), ASC 260-10-55
provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends
or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included
in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. ASC 260-10-55 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those
years. Upon adoption, a company is required to retrospectively adjust its earnings per share data
(including any amounts related to interim periods, summaries of earnings and selected financial
data) to conform to the provisions of ASC 260-10-55. Given that the holder of Restricted Stock Unit
awards (RSUs) will only receive dividends or dividend equivalents on RSUs that have vested prior
to our declaring dividends as well as forfeiting their rights to receive dividends or dividend
equivalents on any unvested portion, we determined that the RSUs are non-participating
securities and therefore are not subject to ASC 260-10-55.
17
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended December 31, 2008 Compared to Three Months Ended December 31, 2009
Revenue. We did not recognize any revenue during the three months ended December 31, 2008 or
2009.
Research and Development Expenses.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
December 31, | Increase | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2009 | $ | % | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Research and Development |
$ | 8,035 | $ | 8,754 | $ | 719 | 9.0 | % | ||||||||
Percentage of net loss |
80.2 | % | 78.5 | % | ||||||||||||
Research and development expenses were $8.8 million for the three months ended December
31, 2009, an increase of $0.7 million, or 9.0%, from $8.0 million for the three months ended
December 31, 2008. This increase was primarily attributable to the net effect of the following
events. Regulatory expenses increased by approximately $1.7 million due to filing our NDA in
December 2009. The remaining increase in the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2009 is attributable
to $0.2 million in personnel expenses and a $0.2 million in consulting expenses. These increases
were offset by reductions in clinical fees of $0.8 million and $0.4 million in research and
development expenses. The savings in clinical fees are the results of an increasing number of
patients completing our two extension trials for VIAject®. We continue to purchase API (recombinant
human insulin) to build commercial supply for VIAject® and have expensed $1.7 million in the fiscal
quarters ended December 31, 2008 and 2009. Research and development expenses for the three months
ended December 31, 2009 include $0.5 million in stock-based compensation expense related to options
and RSUs granted to employees. Because we revalue options granted to non-employee for accounting
purposes each reporting period, the amount of stock-based compensation credit for the quarter ended
December 31, 2009 was $20 thousand.
While we have suspended significant expenditures on our earlier stage product candidates
pending further development of our regulatory plans for VIAject®, we do not anticipate that our
research and development expenses will decrease materially, if at all, as we continue our Phase 3
clinical trial extension program for VIAject®, conduct new clinical trials of VIAject®, produce
validation batches, and purchase recombinant human insulin.
General and Administrative Expenses.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
December 31, | Increase | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2009 | $ | % | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
General and Administrative |
$ | 2,281 | $ | 2,417 | $ | 136 | 6.0 | % | ||||||||
Percentage of net loss |
22.8 | % | 21.7 | % | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses were $2.4 million for the three months ended December
31, 2009, an increase of $0.1 million, or 6.0%, from $2.3 million for the three months ended
December 31, 2008. This increase was primarily attributable to personnel costs. General and
administrative expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2009 include $0.8 million in
stock-based compensation expense related to options and RSUs granted to employees. Because we
revalue options granted to non-employees for accounting purposes each reporting period, the amount
of stock-based compensation credit for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 was $6 thousand.
18
Table of Contents
Our general and administrative expense may increase modestly over the next twelve months as we
increase market research and other commercialization efforts as we approach the potential approval
of VIAject®.
Interest and Other Income.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
December 31, | Decrease | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2009 | $ | % | |||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest and Other Income |
$ | 242 | $ | 5 | $ | 237 | 97.9 | % | ||||||||
Percentage of net loss |
2.4 | % | | |||||||||||||
Interest and other income decreased to $5 thousand for the three months ended
December 31, 2009 from $0.2 million for the three months ended December 31, 2008. The decrease was
due to shifting our investments primarily into treasury securities, the focus on preserving cash
and investing in stable securities generated lower returns in the quarter ended December 31, 2009.
Net Loss per Share.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
December 31, | Increase | |||||||||||||||
2008 | 2009 | $ | % | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (10,024 | ) | $ | (11,148 | ) | $ | 1,124 | 11.2 | % | ||||||
Net loss per share |
$ | (0.42 | ) | $ | (0.47 | ) | ||||||||||
Net loss was $11.1 million, or $(0.47) per share, for the three months ended December 31,
2009 compared to $10.0 million, or $(0.42) per share, for the three months ended December 31, 2008.
The increase in net loss was primarily attributable to the net impact of changes in expenses
described above. While we have suspended significant expenditures of our earlier stage product
candidates in order to focus our product developments efforts on obtaining regulatory approval for
VIAject®, we expect our losses to increase in the future as we initiate additional clinical trials
and pre-approval commercialization efforts of VIAject® to support our commercialization efforts
and, potentially, FDA approval.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources of Liquidity and Cash Flows
As a result of our significant research and development expenditures and the lack of any
approved products or other sources of revenue, we have not been profitable and have generated
significant operating losses since we were incorporated in 2003. We have funded our research and
development operations primarily through proceeds from our Series A convertible preferred stock
financing in 2005 and our mezzanine and Series B convertible preferred stock financings in 2006.
Through December 31, 2006, we had received aggregate gross proceeds of $26.6 million from these
sales. We received an aggregate of $125.6 million from our initial public offering in May 2007 and
follow-on offering in February 2008.
At December 31, 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents totaling approximately $39.6 million.
To date, we have invested our excess funds primarily in managed money funds with one major
financial institution. All highly liquid investments with an original maturity of less than three
months at the date of purchase are categorized as cash equivalents. We plan to continue to invest
our cash and cash equivalents in accordance with our approved investment policy guidelines, which
set forth our policy to hold investment securities to maturity.
Net cash used in operating activities was $15.2 million for the three months ended
December 31, 2009 and $9.3 million for the three months ended December 31, 2008. Net cash used in
operating activities for the three months ended December 31, 2009 primarily reflects the net loss
for the period, offset in part by stock-based compensation, depreciation and amortization expenses,
decreases in accrued expenses and an increase in other receivables, prepaid expenses and accounts
payable. In accordance with 13 CFR 121.901, we requested a small business waiver of the fee the
Company paid to the FDA for reviewing a human drug application under the user fee provisions of the
FFDCA, specifically section 736(D) of the FFDCA. We meet the requirements for the waiver and
therefore recorded the $1.4 million NDA application fee as other receivables. Net cash used in
operating activities for the three months ended December 31, 2008 primarily reflects the net loss
for the period, offset in part by stock-based compensation, depreciation and amortization expenses
and decreases in accounts payable and accrued expenses.
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities was $(40) thousand for the three months
ended December 31, 2009 and $7.5 million for the three months ended December 31, 2008. Net cash
used in investing activities for the three months ended December 31, 2009 primarily
19
Table of Contents
reflects the purchase of equipment. Net cash provided by investing activities for the three
months ended December 31, 2008 primarily reflects the sale of marketable securities offset by
purchases of property and equipment.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $155 thousand for the three months ended
December 31, 2009 and $26 thousand for the three months ended December 31, 2008. Net cash provided
by financing activities in the three months ended December 31, 2009 primarily reflects sale of
stock through our 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Net cash provided by financing activities in
the three months ended December 31, 2008 primarily reflects the proceeds from the sale of stock
through our 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
Funding Requirements
We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to fund our
anticipated operating expenses and capital expenditures at least through the second quarter of
fiscal year 2011. We have based this estimate upon assumptions that may prove to be wrong and we
could use our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect. For example, if the FDA
were to require us to conduct an additional pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial of VIAject®, our
existing capital resources may not be sufficient to complete that clinical development program.
Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with the development and
commercialization of our product candidates, and to the extent that we may or may not enter into
collaborations with third parties to participate in their development and commercialization, we are
unable to estimate the amounts of increased capital outlays and operating expenditures associated
with our current anticipated clinical trials.
Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:
| our ability to secure approval by the FDA for VIAject® under Section 505(b)(2) of the FFDCA; | ||
| our ability to wait the length of time that will elapse before our NDA is fully reviewed by the FDA; | ||
| the costs associated with preparing and submitting our MAA for VIAject® to the EMEA; | ||
| our ability to market, commercialize and achieve market acceptance for product candidates, particularly VIAject® ; | ||
| our ability to secure approval by the FDA for VIAject® without conducting additional pivotal clinical trials; | ||
| the FDAs findings regarding data anomalies observed in India in our Phase 3 clinical trial of VIAject® for patients with Type 1 diabetes and the impact of those findings on the timing of a regulatory approval; | ||
| the size, endpoints and duration of additional clinical trials of VIAject® in patients with Type 1 diabetes to support our commercialization efforts and, potentially, FDA approval; | ||
| the cost to fully develop the 100 IU/cc liquid formulation of VIAject® ; | ||
| our ability to establish that the 100 IU/cc liquid formulation of VIAject® is well-tolerated in chronic use; | ||
| the cost to develop an insulin pen program for use with VIAject® ; | ||
| the cost of purchasing recombinant human insulin and other materials to build commercial supply inventory for VIAject®, taking into account currency exchange rate fluctuations; | ||
| the costs of preparing, filing and prosecuting patent applications and maintaining, enforcing and defending intellectual property-related claims; | ||
| the cost associated with qualifying and obtaining regulatory approval of suppliers of insulin and manufacturers of our product candidates; | ||
| our ability to establish and maintain collaborations and the terms and success of the collaborations, including the timing and amount of payments that we might receive from potential strategic collaborators; and | ||
| the continued participation of patients in our VIAject® Phase 3 clinical trial extension program, which is designed to run through February 2010. |
We do not anticipate generating product revenue for the next few years. In the absence of
additional funding, we expect our continuing operating losses to result in increases in our cash
used in operations over the next several years. To the extent our capital resources are
insufficient to meet our future capital requirements, we will need to finance our future cash needs
through public or private equity offerings, debt financings or corporate collaboration and
licensing arrangements. We do not currently have any commitments for future external funding.
Additional equity or debt financing or corporate collaboration and licensing arrangements may
not be available on acceptable terms, if at all. If adequate funds are not available, we may be
required to delay, reduce the scope of or eliminate some or all of our research and development
programs, reduce our planned commercialization efforts or obtain funds through arrangements with
collaborators or others that may require us to relinquish rights to certain drug candidates that we
might otherwise seek to develop or commercialize independently or enter into corporate
collaborations at a later stage of development. In addition, any future equity funding will dilute
the ownership of our equity investors.
20
Table of Contents
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations and commercial
commitments as of December 31, 2009 (in thousands):
Less | More | |||||||||||||||||||
Than | Than | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | 1 Year | 1-3 Years | 3-5 Years | 5 Years | ||||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations |
$ | 2,813 | $ | 627 | $ | 1,861 | $ | 325 | $ | | ||||||||||
Purchase commitments |
10,314 | 3,213 | 7,101 | | | |||||||||||||||
Total fixed contractual obligations |
$ | 13,127 | $ | 3,840 | $ | 8,962 | $ | 325 | $ | | ||||||||||
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our exposure to market risk is limited to our cash, cash equivalents and marketable
securities. We invest in high-quality financial instruments, as permitted by the terms of our
investment policy guidelines. Currently, our investments are limited to treasury securities. A
portion of our investments may be subject to interest rate risk and could fall in value if interest
rates were to increase. The effective duration of our portfolio is currently less than one year,
which we believe limits interest rate and credit risk. We do not hedge interest rate exposure.
Because most of our transactions are denominated in United States dollars, we do not have any
material exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange rates.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Managements Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial
officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31,
2009. The term disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, means controls and
other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed
by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure
controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure
that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits
under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the companys management, including its
principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter
how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives
and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of
possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures
as of December 31, 2009, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as
of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance
level.
Changes in internal controls
No change in our internal control over financial reporting (defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2009 that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
21
Table of Contents
PART II-OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Risks Related to Our Financial Position and Need for Additional Capital
We have incurred significant losses since our inception. We expect to incur losses for the
foreseeable future and may never achieve or maintain profitability.
Since our inception in December 2003, we have incurred significant operating losses. Our net
loss was approximately $11.1 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2009. As of December 31,
2009, we had a deficit accumulated during the development stage of approximately $137.6 million. We
have invested a significant portion of our efforts and financial resources in the development of
VIAject®, and our ability to generate near-term revenue depends on VIAjects® success. We have not
completed development of VIAject® or any of our other product candidates. We expect to continue to
incur significant operating losses for at least the next several years as we:
| continue to incur expenses without the ability to generate income for the period during which our NDA is fully reviewed by the FDA, if not longer; | ||
| continue our clinical trial extension program for the pivotal Phase 3 clinical trials of VIAject®, which is designed to run through February 2010; | ||
| conduct additional clinical trials of VIAject® to support our commercialization efforts and, potentially, FDA approval; | ||
| produce required validation batches of VIAject® vials, cartridges, and disposable pens to support our NDA for VIAject® | ||
| purchase recombinant human insulin and other materials to build commercial supply inventory for VIAject® and | ||
| conduct additional clinical development of our other product candidates. |
To become and remain profitable, we must succeed in developing and eventually commercializing
drugs with significant market potential. This will require us to be successful in a range of
challenging activities, including successfully completing preclinical testing and clinical trials
of our product candidates, obtaining regulatory approval for these product candidates and
manufacturing, marketing and selling those products for which we may obtain regulatory approval. We
may never succeed in these activities and may never generate revenues that are significant or large
enough to achieve profitability. Even if we do achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain
or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. Our failure to become and remain
profitable could depress the market price of our common stock and could impair our ability to raise
capital, expand our business or continue our operations. A decline in the market price of our
common stock could also cause you to lose all or a part of your investment.
We will need substantial additional funding and may be unable to raise capital when needed, which
would force us to delay, reduce or eliminate our product development programs or commercialization
efforts.
We are a development stage company with no commercial products. All of our product candidates
are still being developed, and all but VIAject® are in early stages of development. Our product
candidates will require significant additional clinical development, regulatory approvals and
related investment before they can be commercialized.
While we have suspended significant expenditures on our earlier stage product candidates
pending further development of our regulatory plans for VIAject®, we do not expect our research and
development expenses to decrease in 2010 as we continue our Phase 3 clinical trial extension
program for VIAject®, conduct new clinical trials of VIAject® to support our commercialization
efforts, produce validation batches, and purchase recombinant human insulin. In addition, subject
to obtaining regulatory approval of any of our product candidates, we expect to incur significant
commercialization expenses to produce commercial quantities of finished product; and we may incur
significant additional sales and marketing expenses depending on our role in commercializing any of
our products that obtain regulatory approval. If we commercialize VIAject® without a commercial
partner, we will need substantial additional funding and may be unable to raise capital when needed
or on attractive terms, which would force us to delay, reduce or eliminate our research and
development programs or commercialization efforts.
Based upon our current plans, we believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and
marketable securities will enable us to fund our anticipated operating expenses and capital
expenditures at least through the second quarter of fiscal year 2011. We cannot assure you that our
plans will not change or that changed circumstances will not result in the depletion of our capital
resources more rapidly than we currently anticipate. Our future capital requirements will depend on
many factors, including:
| our ability to secure approval by the FDA for VIAject® under Section 505(b)(2) of the FFDCA; | ||
| our ability to wait the length of time that will elapse before our NDA is fully reviewed by the FDA; | ||
| the costs associated with preparing and submitting our MAA, for VIAject® to the EMEA; | ||
| our ability to market, commercialize and achieve market acceptance for product candidates, particularly VIAject® | ||
| our ability to secure approval by the FDA for VIAject® without conducting additional pivotal clinical trials; |
22
Table of Contents
| the FDAs findings regarding data anomalies observed in India in our Phase 3 clinical trial of VIAject® for patients with Type 1 diabetes and the impact of those findings on the timing of a regulatory approval; | ||
| the size, endpoints and duration of additional clinical trials of VIAject® in patients with Type 1 diabetes to support our commercialization efforts and, potentially, FDA approval; | ||
| the cost to fully develop the 100 IU/cc liquid formulation of VIAject® | ||
| our ability to establish that the 100 IU/cc liquid formulation of VIAject® is well-tolerated in chronic use; | ||
| the cost to develop an insulin pen program for use with VIAject® | ||
| the cost of purchasing recombinant human insulin and other materials to build commercial supply inventory for VIAject®, taking into account currency exchange rate fluctuations; | ||
| the costs of preparing, filing and prosecuting patent applications and maintaining, enforcing and defending intellectual property-related claims; | ||
| the cost associated with qualifying and obtaining regulatory approval of suppliers of insulin and manufacturers of our product candidates; | ||
| our ability to establish and maintain collaborations and the terms and success of the collaborations, including the timing and amount of payments that we might receive from potential strategic collaborators; and | ||
| the continued participation of patients in our VIAject® Phase 3 clinical trial extension program, which is designed to run through February 2010. |
Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenues, we expect to
finance our cash needs through public or private equity offerings and debt financings, strategic
collaborations and licensing arrangements. If we raise additional funds by issuing additional
equity securities, our stockholders will experience dilution. Debt financing, if available, may
involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific
actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends. Any
debt financing or additional equity that we raise may contain terms, such as liquidation and other
preferences, that are not favorable to us or our stockholders. If we raise additional funds through
collaboration, strategic alliance and licensing arrangements with third parties, it may be
necessary to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies or product candidates, future revenue
streams, research programs or product candidates or to grant licenses on terms that may not be
favorable to us.
Our short operating history may make it difficult for you to evaluate the success of our business
to date and to assess our future viability.
We commenced active operations in January 2004. Our operations to date have been limited to
organizing and staffing our company, developing and securing our technology and undertaking
preclinical studies and clinical trials of our product candidates. We have limited experience
completing large-scale, pivotal clinical trials and we have not yet demonstrated our ability to
obtain regulatory approvals, manufacture a commercial scale product, or arrange for a third party
to do so on our behalf, or conduct sales and marketing activities necessary for successful product
commercialization. Consequently, any predictions you make about our future success or viability may
not be as accurate as they could be if we had a longer operating history.
In addition, as a new business, we may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties,
complications, delays and other known and unknown factors. We will need to transition from a
company with a research focus to a company capable of supporting commercial activities. We may not
be successful in such a transition.
Risks Related to the Development and Commercialization of Our Product Candidates
We depend heavily on the success of our most advanced product candidate, VIAject®. The results
from our completed pivotal Phase 3 clinical trials of VIAject® may not be sufficient to pass the
initial review and acceptance of our NDA submission for VIAject® or to obtain marketing approval
from the FDA. If we are unable to commercialize VIAject® or experience significant delays in doing
so, our business will be materially harmed.
We have invested a significant portion of our efforts and financial resources in the
development of our most advanced product candidate, VIAject®. Our ability to generate significant
product revenues will depend heavily on FDA approval and eventual commercialization
of this product candidate. The results from our completed pivotal Phase 3 clinical trials of
VIAject® may not be sufficient to pass the initial review and acceptance of our NDA submission for
VIAject® or obtain marketing approval from the FDA. Due to data from India in our pivotal Phase 3
clinical trial for patients with Type 1 diabetes that we found to be anomalous when compared to
data from the United States and Germany for the same trial, the FDA could conclude we did not
establish non-inferiority of VIAject® when compared to Humulin® R in terms of blood glucose
control. The FDA may require that we conduct additional clinical trials with VIAject® before
considering or approving our marketing application. Even if it is determined that no additional
clinical trials will be required, we anticipate that VIAject® would not be commercially available
for at least the next 18 months, if at all.
23
Table of Contents
We may never reinitiate significant expenditures on our earlier stage product candidates.
We have suspended significant expenditures on the development of VIAtab and are unlikely to
reinitiate extensive development of our early stage product candidates unless we receive marketing
approval for VIAject® from the FDA. Even if VIAject® is approved by the FDA, we cannot guarantee
that we will have sufficient resources to allocate to earlier stage product candidates or that the
focus of our early stage product development program will not have changed.
The results of clinical trials do not ensure success in future clinical trials or commercial
success.
We have completed and released the results of our two pivotal Phase 3 clinical trials of
VIAject®. Additionally, we have tested one formulation of VIAtab in Phase 1 clinical trials in
patients with Type 1 diabetes and are developing additional formulations for further clinical
testing. We have not completed the development of any products through commercialization. VIAject®
continues to be tested in our Phase 3 clinical trial extension program and we believe we will need
to conduct additional clinical trials to be successful in our commercialization efforts and,
potentially, in order to receive FDA approval. The outcomes of preclinical testing and clinical
trials may not be predictive of the success of later clinical trials. Furthermore, interim or
preliminary results of a clinical trial do not necessarily predict final results. We cannot assure
you that our additional clinical trials of VIAject® will ultimately be successful. New information
regarding the safety, efficacy and tolerability of VIAject® may arise that may be less favorable
than the data observed to date. In addition, we will need to conduct Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical
trials of VIAtab in larger numbers of patients taking the drug for longer periods before we are
able to seek approvals to market and sell VIAtab from the FDA and similar regulatory authorities
outside the United States. If we are not successful in commercializing any of our product
candidates, or are significantly delayed in doing so, our business will be materially harmed. The
commercial success of our product candidates will depend on several factors, including the
following:
| successful completion of preclinical development and clinical trials; | ||
| our ability to identify and enroll patients who meet clinical trial eligibility criteria; | ||
| receipt of marketing approvals from the FDA and similar regulatory authorities outside the United States, including for the liquid formulation of VIAject® | ||
| establishing that our liquid formulation of VIAject® is well-tolerated in chronic use; | ||
| establishing commercial manufacturing capabilities through arrangements with third-party manufacturers; | ||
| launching commercial sales of the products, whether alone or in collaboration with others; | ||
| competition from other products; and | ||
| a continued acceptable safety and tolerability profile of the products following approval. |
If our clinical trials are delayed or do not produce positive results, we may incur additional
costs and ultimately be unable to commercialize our product candidates.
Before obtaining regulatory approval for the sale of our product candidates, we must conduct,
at our own expense, extensive preclinical tests to demonstrate the safety of our product candidates
in animals and clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our product candidates in
humans. Preclinical and clinical testing is expensive, difficult to design and implement, can take
many years to complete and is uncertain as to outcome. A failure of one or more of our clinical
trials can occur at any stage of testing. We may experience numerous unforeseen events during
clinical trials of our product candidates that could delay or prevent our ability to receive
regulatory approval or commercialize our product candidates, including:
| the number of patients required for our clinical trials may be larger than we anticipate, enrollment in our clinical trials may be slower than we currently anticipate, or participants may drop out of our clinical trials at a higher rate than we anticipate, any of which would result in significant delays; | ||
| our third-party contractors may fail to comply with regulatory requirements or meet their contractual obligations to us in a timely manner; | ||
| we might have to suspend or terminate our clinical trials if the participants are being exposed to unacceptable health risks; | ||
| regulators or institutional review boards may require that we hold, suspend or terminate clinical research for various reasons, including noncompliance with regulatory requirements; | ||
| the cost of our clinical trials may be greater than we anticipate; | ||
| the supply or quality of our product candidates or other materials necessary to conduct our clinical trials may be insufficient or inadequate; and | ||
| the effects of our product candidates may not be the desired effects or may include undesirable side effects or the product candidates may have other unexpected characteristics. |
24
Table of Contents
If we are required to conduct additional clinical trials or other testing of our product
candidates beyond those that we currently contemplate, if we are unable to successfully complete
our clinical trials or other testing, if the results of these trials or tests are not positive or
are only modestly positive or if there are safety concerns, we may:
| be delayed in obtaining marketing approval for our product candidates; | ||
| not be able to obtain marketing approval; | ||
| obtain approval for indications that are not as broad as intended; or | ||
| have the product removed from the market after obtaining marketing approval. |
Our product development costs will also increase if we experience delays in testing or
approvals. We do not know whether any preclinical tests or clinical trials will begin as planned,
will need to be restructured or will be completed on schedule, if at all. Significant preclinical
or clinical trial delays also could shorten any periods during which we may have the exclusive
right to commercialize our product candidates or allow our competitors to bring products to market
before we do and impair our ability to commercialize our products or product candidates and may
harm our business and results of operations.
If our product candidates are found to cause undesirable side effects we may need to delay or
abandon our development and commercialization efforts.
Any undesirable side effects that might be caused by our product candidates could interrupt,
delay or halt clinical trials and could result in the denial of regulatory approval by the FDA or
other regulatory authorities for any or all targeted indications. In addition, if any of our
product candidates receive marketing approval and we or others later identify undesirable side
effects caused by the product, we could face one or more of the following:
| a change in the labeling statements or withdrawal of FDA or other regulatory approval of the product; | ||
| a change in the way the product is administered; or | ||
| the need to conduct additional clinical trials. |
Any of these events could prevent us from achieving or maintaining market acceptance of the
affected product or could substantially increase the costs and expenses of commercializing the
product, which in turn could delay or prevent us from generating significant revenues from its
sale.
Reports of side effects or safety concerns in related technology fields or in other companies
clinical trials could delay or prevent us from obtaining regulatory approval or negatively impact
public perception of our product candidates.
At present, there are a number of clinical trials being conducted by us and by other
pharmaceutical companies involving insulin or insulin delivery systems. The major safety concern
with patients taking insulin is the occurrence of hypoglycemic events. If we discover that our
product is associated with a significantly increased frequency of hypoglycemic or other adverse
events, or if other pharmaceutical companies announce that they observed frequent or significant
adverse events in their trials involving insulin or insulin delivery systems, we could encounter
delays in the commencement or completion of our clinical trials or difficulties in obtaining the
approval of our product candidates. In addition, the public perception of our products might be
adversely affected, which could harm our business and results of operations, even if the concern
relates to another companys product.
The commercial success of any product candidates that we may develop, including
VIAject® and VIAtab will depend upon the degree of market acceptance by physicians,
patients, healthcare payors and others in the medical community.
Any products that we bring to the market, including VIAject® and VIAtab, if they receive
marketing approval, may not gain market acceptance by physicians, patients, healthcare payors and
others in the medical community. If these products do not achieve an adequate level of acceptance,
we may not generate significant product revenues and we may not become profitable. Physicians will
not recommend our product candidates until clinical data or other factors demonstrate the safety
and efficacy of our product candidates as compared to other treatments. Even if the clinical safety
and efficacy of our product candidates is established, physicians may elect not to recommend these
product candidates for a variety of reasons including the reimbursement policies of government and
third-party payors, the effectiveness of our competitors in marketing their products and, in the
case of VIAject®, the possibility that patients may experience more injection site discomfort than
they experience with competing products. In our analysis of our completed pivotal Phase 3 clinical
trials we found that VIAject® was associated with injection site discomfort, although the
prevalence of discomfort decreased during the course of the treatment. In addition, in an October
2009 tolerability trial of the liquid formulation of VIAject® it was determined that a subset of
patients experienced more injection site discomfort with VIAject® than they did with Humalog®.
The degree of market acceptance of our product candidates, if approved for commercial sale,
will depend on a number of factors, including:
| the willingness and ability of patients and the healthcare community to adopt our technology; |
25
Table of Contents
| the ability to manufacture our product candidates in sufficient quantities with acceptable quality and to offer our product candidates for sale at competitive prices; | ||
| the perception of patients and the healthcare community, including third-party payors, regarding the safety, efficacy and benefits of our product candidates compared to those of competing products or therapies; | ||
| the convenience and ease of administration of our product candidates relative to existing treatment methods, such as our ability to gain regulatory approval for our liquid 100 IU/cc formulation of VIAject® | ||
| the label and promotional claims allowed by the FDA, such as, in the case of VIAject®, claims relating to glycemic control, hypoglycemia, weight gain, injection site discomfort, expiry dating and required handling conditions; | ||
| the pricing and reimbursement of our product candidates relative to existing treatments; and | ||
| marketing and distribution support for our product candidates. |
If we fail to enter into strategic collaborations for the commercialization of our product
candidates or if our collaborations are unsuccessful, we may be required to establish our own
sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution capabilities which will be expensive, require
additional capital we do not currently have, and could delay the commercialization of our product
candidates and have a material and adverse affect on our business.
A broad base of physicians, including primary care physicians, internists and
endocrinologists, treat patients with diabetes. A large sales force may be required to educate and
support these physicians. Therefore, our current strategy for developing, manufacturing and
commercializing our product candidates includes securing collaborations with leading pharmaceutical
and biotechnology companies for the commercialization of our product candidates. To date, we have
not entered into any collaborations with pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies. We face
significant competition in seeking appropriate collaborators. In addition, collaboration agreements
are complex and time-consuming to negotiate, document and implement. For all these reasons, it may
be difficult for us to find third parties that are willing to enter into collaborations on economic
terms that are favorable to us, or at all. If we do enter into any such collaboration, the
collaboration may not be successful. The success of our collaboration arrangements will depend
heavily on the efforts and activities of our collaborators. It is likely that our collaborators
will have significant discretion in determining the efforts and resources that they will apply to
these collaborations.
If we fail to enter into collaborations, or if our collaborations are unsuccessful, we may be
required to establish our own direct sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution capabilities.
Establishing these capabilities can be time-consuming and expensive and we have little experience
in doing so. Because of our size, we would be at a disadvantage to our potential competitors to the
extent they collaborate with large pharmaceutical companies that have substantially more resources
than we do. As a result, we would not initially be able to field a sales force as large as our
competitors or provide the same degree of market research or marketing support. In addition, our
competitors would have a greater ability to devote research resources toward expansion of the
indications for their products. We cannot assure prospective investors that we will succeed in
entering into acceptable collaborations, that any such collaboration will be successful or, if not,
that we will successfully develop our own sales, marketing and distribution capabilities.
If we are unable to obtain adequate reimbursement from governments or third-party payors for any products that we may develop or if we are unable to obtain acceptable prices for those products, they may not be purchased or used and our revenues and prospects for profitability will suffer. |
Our future revenues and profits will depend heavily upon the availability of adequate
reimbursement for the use of our approved product candidates from governmental and other
third-party payors, both in the United States and in other markets. Reimbursement by a third-party
payor may depend upon a number of factors, including the third-party payors determination that use
of a product is:
| a covered benefit under its health plan; | ||
| safe, effective and medically necessary; | ||
| appropriate for the specific patient; | ||
| cost-effective; and | ||
| neither experimental nor investigational. |
Obtaining reimbursement approval for a product from each government or other third-party payor
is a time-consuming and costly process that could require us to provide supporting scientific,
clinical and cost-effectiveness data for the use of our products to each payor. We may not be able
to provide data sufficient to gain acceptance with respect to reimbursement. Even when a payor
determines that a product is eligible for reimbursement, the payor may impose coverage limitations
that preclude payment for some uses that are approved by the FDA or comparable authorities. In
addition, eligibility for coverage does not imply that any product will be reimbursed in all cases
or at a rate that allows us to make a profit or even cover our costs. Interim payments for new
products, if applicable, may also not be sufficient to cover our costs and may not be made
permanent.
We are subject to pricing pressures and uncertainties regarding Medicare reimbursement and reform.
Reforms in Medicare added a prescription drug reimbursement benefit beginning in 2006 for all
Medicare beneficiaries. Although we cannot predict the full effects on our business of the
implementation of this legislation, it is possible that the new benefit, which will be
26
Table of Contents
managed by private health insurers, pharmacy benefit managers, and other managed care
organizations, will result in decreased reimbursement for prescription drugs, which may further
exacerbate industry-wide pressure to reduce the prices charged for prescription drugs. This could
harm our ability to generate revenues.
Governments outside the United States tend to impose strict price controls, which may adversely
affect our revenues, if any.
In some countries, particularly the countries of the European Union, the pricing of
prescription pharmaceuticals is subject to governmental control. In these countries, pricing
negotiations with governmental authorities can take considerable time after the receipt of
marketing approval for a product. To obtain reimbursement or pricing approval in some countries, we
may be required to conduct a clinical trial that compares the cost-effectiveness of our product
candidate to other available therapies. If reimbursement of our products is unavailable or limited
in scope or amount, or if pricing is set at unsatisfactory levels, our business could be adversely
affected.
Legislation has been introduced in Congress that, if enacted, would permit more widespread
re-importation of drugs from foreign countries into the United States, which may include
re-importation from foreign countries where the drugs are sold at lower prices than in the United
States. Such legislation, or similar regulatory changes, could decrease the price we receive for
any approved products which, in turn, could adversely affect our operating results and our overall
financial condition.
Product liability lawsuits against us could cause us to incur substantial liabilities and to limit
commercialization of any products that we may develop.
We face an inherent risk of product liability exposure related to the testing of our product
candidates in human clinical trials and will face an even greater risk if we commercially sell any
products that we may develop. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against claims that our
product candidates or products caused injuries, we will incur substantial liabilities. Regardless
of merit or eventual outcome, liability claims may result in:
| decreased demand for any product candidates or products that we may develop; | ||
| injury to our reputation; | ||
| withdrawal of clinical trial participants; | ||
| costs to defend the related litigation; | ||
| substantial monetary awards to trial participants or patients; | ||
| loss of revenue; and | ||
| the inability to commercialize any products that we may develop. |
We currently carry global liability insurance that we believe is sufficient to cover us from
potential damages arising from clinical trials of VIAject®. We also carry local insurance policies
per clinical trial of our product candidates. The amount of insurance that we currently hold may
not be adequate to cover all liabilities that we may incur. We intend to expand our insurance
coverage to include the sale of commercial products if we obtain marketing approval for any
products. Insurance coverage is increasingly expensive. We may not be able to maintain insurance
coverage at a reasonable cost. If losses from product liability claims exceed our liability
insurance coverage, we may ourselves incur substantial liabilities. If we are required to pay a
product liability claim, we may not have sufficient financial resources to complete development or
commercialization of any of our product candidates and, if so, our business and results of
operations would be harmed.
We face substantial competition in the development of our product candidates which may result in
others developing or commercializing products before or more successfully than we do.
We are engaged in segments of the pharmaceutical industry that are characterized by intense
competition and rapidly evolving technology. Many large pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies,
academic institutions, governmental agencies and other public and private research organizations
are pursuing the development of novel drugs that target endocrine disorders. We face, and expect to
continue to face, intense and increasing competition as new products enter the market and advanced
technologies become available. There are several approved injectable rapid-acting mealtime insulin
analogs currently on the market including Humalog®, marketed by Eli Lilly and Company, NovoLog®,
marketed by Novo Nordisk A/S, and Apidra®, marketed by Sanofi-Aventis. These rapid-acting insulin
analogs provide improvement over regular forms of short-acting insulin, including faster
subcutaneous absorption, an earlier and greater insulin peak and more rapid post-peak decrease. In
addition, other development stage rapid-acting insulin formulations may be approved and compete
with VIAject®. Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. has conducted a Phase 1 and Phase 2 clinical trial of
Humulin® R and Humalog® in combination with a recombinant human hyaluronidase enzyme and has
reported that in each case the combination yielded pharmacokinetics and glucodynamics that better
mimicked physiologic mealtime insulin release and activity than Humulin® R or Humalog® alone.
Generex Biotechnology Corporation has developed an oral spray that is currently in Phase 3
development. Several companies are also developing alternative insulin systems for diabetes,
including MannKind Corporation, which has submitted its NDA in early 2009. In addition, a number of
established pharmaceutical companies, including GlaxoSmithKline plc, and Bristol-Myers Squibb
Company, are developing proprietary technologies or have entered into arrangements with, or
acquired, companies with technologies for the treatment of diabetes.
Potential competitors also include academic institutions, government agencies and other public
and private research organizations that conduct research, seek patent protection and establish
collaborative arrangements for research, development, manufacturing and commercialization. Our
competitors may develop products that are more effective, safer, more convenient or less costly
than any that we are
27
Table of Contents
developing or that would render our product candidates obsolete or non-competitive. Our
competitors may also obtain FDA or other regulatory approval for their products more rapidly than
we may obtain approval for ours.
Many of our potential competitors have:
| significantly greater financial, technical and human resources than we have and may be better equipped to discover, develop, manufacture and commercialize product candidates; | ||
| more extensive experience in preclinical testing and clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals and manufacturing and marketing pharmaceutical products; | ||
| product candidates that have been approved or are in late-stage clinical development; or | ||
| collaborative arrangements in our target markets with leading companies and research institutions. |
Our product candidates may be rendered obsolete by technological change.
The rapid rate of scientific discoveries and technological changes could result in one or more
of our product candidates becoming obsolete or noncompetitive. For several decades, scientists have
attempted to improve the bioavailability of injected formulations and to devise
alternative non-invasive delivery systems for the delivery of drugs such as insulin. Our
product candidates will compete against many products with similar indications. In addition to the
currently marketed rapid-acting insulin analogs, our competitors are developing insulin
formulations delivered by oral pills, pulmonary devices and oral spray devices. Our future success
will depend not only on our ability to develop our product candidates, but also on our ability to
maintain market acceptance against emerging industry developments. We cannot assure present or
prospective stockholders that we will be able to do so.
Our business activities involve the storage and use of hazardous materials, which require
compliance with environmental and occupational safety laws regulating the use of such materials.
If we violate these laws, we could be subject to significant fines, liabilities or other adverse
consequences.
Our research and development work and manufacturing processes involve the controlled storage
and use of hazardous materials, including chemical and biological materials. Our operations also
produce hazardous waste products. We are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations
governing the use, manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of these materials. Although we
believe that our safety procedures for handling and disposing of such materials and waste products
comply in all material respects with the standards prescribed by federal, state and local laws and
regulations, the risk of accidental contamination or injury from hazardous materials cannot be
completely eliminated. In the event of an accident or failure to comply with environmental laws, we
could be held liable for any damages that may result, and any such liability could fall outside the
coverage or exceed the limits of our insurance. In addition, we could be required to incur
significant costs to comply with environmental laws and regulations in the future or pay
substantial fines or penalties if we violate any of these laws or regulations. Finally, current or
future environmental laws and regulations may impair our research, development or production
efforts.
Risks Related to Our Dependence on Third Parties
Use of third parties to manufacture our product candidates may increase the risks that we will not
have sufficient quantities of our product candidates or such quantities at an acceptable cost, or
that our suppliers will not be able to manufacture our products in their final dosage form. In any
such case, clinical development and commercialization of our product candidates could be delayed,
prevented or impaired.
We do not currently own or operate manufacturing facilities for commercial production of our
product candidates. We have limited experience in drug manufacturing and we lack the resources and
the capabilities to manufacture any of our product candidates on a clinical or commercial scale.
Our current strategy is to outsource all manufacturing of our product candidates and products to
third parties. We also expect to rely upon third parties to produce materials required for the
commercial production of our product candidates if we succeed in obtaining necessary regulatory
approvals. We currently rely on one manufacturer to manufacture our VIAject® product candidate. We
intend to negotiate a commercial manufacturing agreement with this manufacturer but cannot
guarantee that we will reach agreement in a timely manner or on terms that are favorable to us.
There can be no assurance that this manufacturer will support our VIAject® or other
manufacturing programs in the future. The manufacture of pharmaceutical products requires
significant expertise and capital investment, including the development of advanced manufacturing
techniques, processes and quality controls.
Reliance on third-party manufacturers entails risks to which we would not be subject if we
manufactured product candidates or products ourselves, including:
| reliance on the third party for regulatory compliance and quality assurance; | ||
| the possible breach of the manufacturing agreement by the third party because of factors beyond our control; and | ||
| the possible refusal by the third party to support our manufacturing programs, based on its own business priorities, at a time that is costly or inconvenient for us. |
Our manufacturers may not be able to comply with current good manufacturing practice, or cGMP,
regulations or other regulatory requirements or similar regulatory requirements outside the United
States. Our manufacturers are subject to unannounced inspections by the
28
Table of Contents
FDA, state regulators and similar regulators outside the United States. Our failure, or the
failure of our third-party manufacturers, to comply with applicable regulations could result in
sanctions being imposed on us, including fines, injunctions, civil penalties, failure of regulatory
authorities to grant marketing approval of our product candidates, delays, suspension or withdrawal
of approvals, license revocation, seizures or recalls of product candidates or products, operating
restrictions and criminal prosecutions, any of which could significantly and adversely affect
supplies of our product candidates.
Our product candidates and any products that we may develop may compete with other product
candidates and products for access to manufacturing facilities. There are a limited number of
manufacturers that operate under cGMP regulations and that are both capable of manufacturing for us
and willing to do so. If the third parties that we engage to manufacture product for our clinical
trials should cease to continue to do so for any reason, we likely would experience delays in
advancing these trials while we identify and qualify replacement suppliers and we may be unable to
obtain replacement supplies on terms that are favorable to us. In addition, if we are not able to
obtain adequate supplies of our product candidates or the drug substances used to manufacture them,
it will be more difficult for us to develop our product candidates and compete effectively.
Our current and anticipated future dependence upon others for the manufacture of our product
candidates may adversely affect our future profit margins and our ability to develop product
candidates and commercialize any products that receive regulatory approval on a timely and
competitive basis.
We rely on third parties to conduct our clinical trials and those third parties may not perform
satisfactorily, including failing to meet established deadlines for the completion of such trials.
We do not independently conduct clinical trials of our product candidates. We rely on third
parties, such as contract research organizations, clinical data management organizations, medical
institutions and clinical investigators, to enroll qualified patients and conduct our clinical
trials. Our reliance on these third parties for clinical development activities reduces our control
over these activities. We are responsible for ensuring that each of our clinical trials is
conducted in accordance with the general investigational plan and protocols for the trial.
Moreover, the FDA requires us to comply with standards, commonly referred to as Good Clinical
Practices, for conducting, recording, and reporting the results of clinical trials to assure that
data and reported results are credible and accurate and that the rights, integrity and
confidentiality of trial participants are protected. Our reliance on third parties that we do not
control does not relieve us of these responsibilities and requirements. Furthermore, these third
parties may also have relationships with other entities, some of which may be our competitors. If
these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, meet expected deadlines
or conduct our clinical trials in accordance with regulatory requirements or our stated protocols,
we will not be able to obtain, or may be delayed in obtaining, regulatory approvals for our product
candidates and will not be able to, or may be delayed in our efforts to, successfully commercialize
our product candidates.
If our suppliers, principally our sole insulin supplier, fail to deliver materials and provide
services needed for the production of VIAject® and VIAtab in a timely and sufficient
manner, or if they fail to comply with applicable regulations, clinical development or regulatory
approval of our product candidates or commercialization of our products could be delayed,
producing additional losses and depriving us of potential product revenue.
We need access to sufficient, reliable and affordable supplies of recombinant human insulin
and other materials for which we rely on various suppliers. We also must rely on those suppliers to
comply with relevant regulatory and other legal requirements, including the production of insulin
in accordance with cGMP. We can make no assurances that our suppliers, particularly our insulin
supplier, will comply with cGMP.
We have recently entered into a new agreement with our existing single insulin supplier from
which we obtain all of the insulin that we use for testing and manufacturing VIAject® and VIAtab.
Our agreement with this insulin supplier will terminate in December 2011. We are discussing the
possibility of extending this supply agreement beyond 2011, but we cannot guarantee that this
effort will be successful.
We believe that our current supplies of insulin, together with the quantities of insulin
called for under our existing supply agreement, will be sufficient to allow us to complete our
current clinical trial extension program and anticipated future clinical trials of
VIAject®. In addition, we believe that the quantities available under the agreement will
be sufficient to support our needs for approximately three years following the commercial launch of
VIAject®. We are seeking to qualify other insulin suppliers to serve as additional or alternative
suppliers if we are unable or choose not to enter into a new commercial supply agreement with our
existing supplier. We cannot assure you that we will be able to qualify a new insulin supplier
prior to December 2011. Even if we do qualify a new supplier in a timely manner, the cost of
switching or adding additional suppliers may be significant, and we cannot assure you that we will
be able to enter into a commercial supply agreement with a new supplier on favorable terms. If we
are unable to procure sufficient quantities of insulin from our current or any future supplier, if
supply of recombinant human insulin and other materials otherwise becomes limited, or if our
suppliers do not meet relevant regulatory requirements, and if we were unable to obtain these
materials in sufficient amounts, in a timely manner and at reasonable prices, we could be delayed
in the manufacturing and future commercialization of VIAject® and VIAtab, which would
have a material adverse effect on our business. We would incur substantial costs and manufacturing
delays if our suppliers are unable to provide us with products or services approved by the FDA or
other regulatory agencies.
Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property
If we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights, our competitors may develop and
market similar or identical products that may reduce demand for our products, and we may be
prevented from establishing collaborative relationships on favorable terms.
29
Table of Contents
The following factors are important to our success:
| receiving patent protection for our product candidates; | ||
| maintaining our trade secrets; | ||
| not infringing on the proprietary rights of others; and | ||
| preventing others from infringing our proprietary rights. |
We will be able to protect our proprietary rights from unauthorized use by third parties only
to the extent that our proprietary rights are covered by valid and enforceable patents or are
effectively maintained as trade secrets. We try to protect our proprietary position by filing U.S.
and foreign patent applications related to our proprietary technology, inventions and improvements
that are important to the development of our business. Because the patent position of
pharmaceutical companies involves complex legal and factual questions, the issuance, scope and
enforceability of patents cannot be predicted with certainty. Patents, if issued, may be
challenged, invalidated or circumvented. Thus, any patents that we own or license from others may
not provide any protection against competitors.
We have been granted one U.S. patent and one European patent in all of the designation
countries, several pending United States patent applications relating to our VIAject® and VIAtab
technology and several pending U.S. foreign patent applications relating to our technology for
enhancing delivery of drugs. These pending patent applications, those we may file in the future, or
those we may license from third parties, may not result in patents being issued. If patents do not
issue with claims encompassing our products, our competitors may develop and market similar or
identical products that compete with ours. Even if patents are issued, they may not provide us with
proprietary protection or competitive advantages against competitors with similar technology.
Failure to obtain effective patent protection for our technology and products may reduce demand for
our products and prevent us from establishing collaborative relationships on favorable terms.
The active and inactive ingredients in our VIAject® and VIAtab product candidates have been
known and used for many years and, therefore, are no longer subject to patent protection.
Accordingly, our granted U.S. and foreign patents and pending patent applications are directed to
the particular formulations of these ingredients in our products, and their use. Although we
believe our formulations and their use are patentable and provide a competitive advantage, even if
issued, our patents may not prevent others from marketing formulations using the same active and
inactive ingredients in similar but different formulations.
We also rely on trade secrets, know-how and technology, which are not protected by patents, to
maintain our competitive position. We try to protect this information by entering into
confidentiality agreements with parties that have access to it, such as potential corporate
partners, collaborators, employees and consultants. Any of these parties may breach the agreements
and disclose our confidential information or our competitors may learn of the information in some
other way. Furthermore, others may independently develop similar technologies or duplicate any
technology that we have developed. If any trade secret, know-how or other technology not protected
by a patent were to be disclosed to or independently developed by a competitor, our business and
financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
The laws of many foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same
extent as do the laws of the United States.
We may become involved in lawsuits and administrative proceedings to protect, defend or enforce
our patents that would be expensive and time-consuming.
In order to protect or enforce our patent rights, we may initiate patent litigation against
third parties in the United States or in foreign countries. In addition, we may be subject to
certain opposition proceedings conducted in patent and trademark offices challenging the validity
of our patents and may become involved in future opposition proceedings challenging the patents of
others. The defense of intellectual property rights, including patent rights, through lawsuits,
interference or opposition proceedings, and other legal and administrative proceedings can be
costly and can divert our technical and management personnel from their normal responsibilities.
Such costs increase our operating losses and reduce our resources available for development
activities. An adverse determination of any litigation or defense proceedings could put one or more
of our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and could put our patent
applications at risk of not issuing.
Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with
intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could
be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. For example, during the course of this
kind of litigation and despite protective orders entered by the court, confidential information may
be inadvertently disclosed in the form of documents or testimony in connection with discovery
requests, depositions or trial testimony. This disclosure could materially adversely affect our
business and financial results.
Claims by other parties that we infringe or have misappropriated their proprietary technology may
result in liability for damages, royalties, or other payments, or stop our development and
commercialization efforts.
Competitors and other third parties may initiate patent litigation against us in the United
States or in foreign countries based on existing patents or patents that may be granted in the
future. Many of our competitors may have obtained patents covering products and processes generally
related to our products and processes, and they may assert these patents against us. Moreover,
there can be no assurance that these competitors have not sought or will not seek additional
patents that may cover aspects of our technology. As a result, there is a greater likelihood of a
patent dispute than would be expected if our competitors were pursuing unrelated technologies.
While we conduct patent searches to determine whether the technologies used in our products
infringe patents held by third parties, numerous patent applications are currently pending and may
be filed in the future for technologies generally related to our technologies,
30
Table of Contents
including many patent applications that remain confidential after filing. Due to these factors
and the inherent uncertainty in conducting patent searches, there can be no guarantee that we will
not violate third-party patent rights that we have not yet identified.
There may be U.S. and foreign patents issued to third parties that relate to aspects of our
product candidates. There may also be patent applications filed by these or other parties in the
United States and various foreign jurisdictions that relate to some aspects of our product
candidates, which, if issued, could subject us to infringement actions. The owners or licensees of
these and other patents may file one or more infringement actions against us. In addition, a
competitor may claim misappropriation of a trade secret by an employee hired from that competitor.
Any such infringement or misappropriation action could cause us to incur substantial costs
defending the lawsuit and could distract our management from our business, even if the allegations
of infringement or misappropriation are unwarranted. A need to defend multiple actions or claims
could have a disproportionately greater impact. In addition, either in response to or in
anticipation of any such infringement or misappropriation claim, we may enter into commercial
agreements with the owners or licensees of these rights. The terms of these commercial agreements
may include substantial payments, including substantial royalty payments on revenues received by us
in connection with the commercialization of our products.
Payments under such agreements could increase our operating losses and reduce our resources
available for development activities. Furthermore, a party making this type of claim could secure a
judgment that requires us to pay substantial damages, which would increase our operating losses and
reduce our resources available for development activities. A judgment could also include an
injunction or other court order that could prevent us from making, using, selling, offering for
sale or importing our products or prevent our customers from using our products. If a court
determined or if we independently concluded that any of our products or manufacturing processes
violated third-party proprietary rights, our clinical trials could be delayed and there can be no
assurance that we would be able to reengineer the product or processes to avoid those rights, or to
obtain a license under those rights on commercially reasonable terms, if at all.
Risks Related to Regulatory Approval of Our Product Candidates
If we are unable to obtain required regulatory approvals, we will not be able to commercialize
VIAject® as planned, or at all, and our ability to generate revenue will be materially impaired.
We have invested a significant portion of our efforts and financial resources in the
development of VIAject®, and our ability to generate near-term revenue depends on VIAjects®
success. All of our product candidates, including VIAject®, and the activities associated with
their development and commercialization, including their testing, manufacture, safety, efficacy,
recordkeeping, labeling, storage, approval, advertising, promotion, sale and distribution, are
subject to comprehensive regulation by the FDA and other regulatory agencies in the United States
and by comparable authorities in other countries. Failure to obtain regulatory approval for a
product candidate will prevent us from commercializing the product candidate. Securing FDA approval
requires the submission of an NDA containing extensive preclinical and clinical data and supporting
information for each therapeutic indication to establish the product candidates safety and
efficacy. Securing FDA approval also requires the submission of information about the product
manufacturing process to, and inspection of manufacturing facilities by, the FDA.
While we have submitted an NDA for VIAject®, we have not received regulatory approval to
market VIAject® or any of our other product candidates in the United States or any other
jurisdiction. We cannot guarantee that the FDA will accept our NDA as filed, review our NDA in a
timely fashion or approve our NDA. Many companies that have believed that their products performed
satisfactorily in clinical trials have nonetheless failed to obtain FDA approval for their
products. Upon the FDAs review of our NDA, it may request that we conduct additional analyses of
the data and, if it believes that the data are not satisfactory, could request additional
information from us, including data that may necessitate additional clinical trials. While we
announced positive results from our pivotal Phase 3 clinical trial of VIAject®, data from patients
with Type 1 diabetes in India were found to be anomalous when compared to data from the United
States and Germany for the same trial. As a result, the FDA could conclude we did not establish
non-inferiority of VIAject® when compared to Humulin® R in terms of blood glucose control. Failure
of the FDA to accept our NDA as filed, review our NDA in a timely fashion, or approve our NDA will
materially impair our ability to generate product revenue and our business.
If the FDA does not believe that our product candidates satisfy the requirements for the Section
505(b)(2) approval procedure, the approval pathway will take longer and cost more than anticipated
and in either case may not be successful.
We believe that VIAject® and VIAtab qualify for approval under Section 505(b)(2) of the
FFDCA. Because we are developing new formulations of previously approved chemical entities, such as
insulin, this may enable us to avoid having to submit certain types of data and studies that are
required in full NDAs and instead submit an NDA under Section 505(b)(2). The FDA may not agree that
our products are approvable under Section 505(b)(2). Insulin is a unique and complex drug that is
associated with more intra-and inter-patient variability than many small molecule drugs. The
availability of the Section 505(b)(2) pathway for insulin is even more controversial than for small
molecule drugs, and the FDA may not accept this pathway for our insulin product candidates. The FDA
has not published any guidance that specifically addresses an NDA for an insulin product candidate
under Section 505(b)(2). No other insulin product has yet been approved pursuant to an NDA under
Section 505(b)(2). If the FDA determines that NDAs under Section 505(b)(2) are not appropriate and
that full NDAs are required for our product candidates, the time and financial resources required
to obtain FDA approval for our product candidates could substantially and materially increase. This
would require us to obtain substantially more funding than previously anticipated which could
significantly dilute the ownership interests of our stockholders. Even with this investment, the
prospect for FDA approval may be significantly lower. If the FDA requires full NDAs for our product
candidates or requires more extensive testing and development for some other reason, our ability to
compete with alternative products that arrive on the market more quickly than our product
candidates would be adversely impacted.
31
Table of Contents
Notwithstanding the approval of many products by the FDA under Section 505(b)(2) over the last
few years, certain brand-name pharmaceutical companies and others have objected to the FDAs
interpretation of Section 505(b)(2). If the FDAs interpretation of Section 505(b)(2) is
successfully challenged, the FDA may be required to change its interpretation of Section 505(b)(2)
which could delay or even prevent the FDA from approving any NDA under Section 505(b)(2) that we
submit. The pharmaceutical industry is highly competitive, and it is not uncommon for a
manufacturer of an approved product to file a citizen petition with the FDA seeking to delay
approval of, or impose additional approval requirements for, pending competing products. If
successful, such petitions can significantly delay, or even prevent, the approval of the new
product. However, even if the FDA ultimately denies such a petition, the FDA may substantially
delay approval while it considers and responds to the petition.
Moreover, even if VIAject® and VIAtab are approved under Section 505(b)(2), the approval may
be subject to limitations on the indicated uses for which the product may be marketed or to other
conditions of approval, or may contain requirements for costly post-marketing testing and
surveillance to monitor the safety or efficacy of the product.
Any product for which we obtain marketing approval could be subject to restrictions or withdrawal
from the market and we may be subject to penalties if we fail to comply with regulatory
requirements or if we experience unanticipated problems with our products, when and if any of them
are approved.
Any product for which we obtain marketing approval, along with the manufacturing processes,
post-approval clinical data, labeling, advertising and promotional activities for such product,
will be subject to continual requirements of and review by the FDA and comparable regulatory
authorities. These requirements include, in the case of FDA, submissions of safety and other
post-marketing information and reports, registration requirements, cGMP requirements relating to
quality control, quality assurance and corresponding maintenance of records and documents,
requirements regarding the distribution of samples to physicians and recordkeeping. Even if
regulatory approval of a product is granted, the approval may be subject to limitations on the
indicated uses for which the product may be marketed or to other conditions of approval, or may
contain requirements for costly post-marketing testing and surveillance to monitor the safety or
efficacy of the product. In addition, if any of our product candidates are approved, our product
labeling, advertising and promotion would be subject to regulatory requirements and continuing
regulatory review. The FDA strictly regulates the promotional claims that may be made about
prescription drug products. In particular, a drug may not be promoted in a misleading manner or for
uses that are not approved by the FDA as reflected in the products approved labeling. The FDA and
other agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting misleading promotion and the
promotion of off-label uses, and a company that is found to have improperly promoted off-label uses
may be subject to significant liability.
Discovery after approval of previously unknown problems with our products, manufacturers or
manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in actions
such as:
| restrictions on such products manufacturers or manufacturing processes; | ||
| restrictions on the marketing or distribution of a product; | ||
| warning letters; | ||
| withdrawal of the products from the market; | ||
| refusal to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications that we submit; | ||
| recall of products; | ||
| fines, restitution or disgorgement of profits or revenue; | ||
| suspension or withdrawal of regulatory approvals; | ||
| refusal to permit the import or export of our products; | ||
| product seizure; | ||
| injunctions; or | ||
| imposition of civil or criminal penalties. |
Legislation may make it more difficult and costly for us to obtain regulatory approval of our
product candidates and to produce, market and distribute our existing products.
On September 27, 2007, President Bush signed into law the Food and Drug Administration
Amendments Act of 2007, or the FDAAA. This new legislation grants significant new powers to the
FDA, many of which are aimed at improving drug safety and assuring the safety of drug products
after approval. Under the FDAAA, companies that violate the new law are subject to substantial
civil monetary penalties. While we expect the FDAAA to have a significant impact on the
pharmaceutical industry, the extent of the impact is not yet known. The new requirements and
changes imposed by the FDAAA may make it more difficult, and more costly, to obtain and maintain
approval of new pharmaceutical products and to produce, market and distribute existing products.
In addition, the FDAs regulations, policies or guidance may change and new or additional
statutes or government regulations may be enacted that could prevent or delay regulatory approval
of our product candidates or further restrict or regulate post-approval activities. It is
32
Table of Contents
impossible to predict whether additional legislative changes will be enacted, or FDA
regulations, guidance or interpretations implemented or modified, or what the impact of such
changes, if any, may be.
Failure to obtain regulatory approval in international jurisdictions would prevent us from
marketing our products abroad.
We intend to have our products marketed outside the United States. In order to market our
products in the European Union and many other jurisdictions, we must obtain separate regulatory
approvals and comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements of other countries regarding
safety and efficacy and governing, among other things, clinical trials and commercial sales and
distribution of our products. The approval procedure varies among countries and can involve
additional testing. The time required to obtain approval may differ from that required to obtain
FDA approval. The regulatory approval process outside the United States may include all of the
risks associated with obtaining FDA approval, as well as additional risks. In addition, in many
countries outside the United States, it is required that the product be approved for reimbursement
before the product can be approved for sale in that country. We may not obtain approvals from
regulatory authorities outside the United States on a timely basis, if at all. Approval by the FDA
does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other countries or jurisdictions, and
approval by one regulatory authority outside the United States does not ensure approval by
regulatory authorities in other countries or jurisdictions or by the FDA. We may not be able to
file for regulatory approvals and may not receive necessary approvals to commercialize our products
in any market.
Risks Related to Employee Matters and Managing Growth
Our future success depends on our ability to retain our chief executive officer and other key
executives and to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel.
We are highly dependent on Dr. Solomon S. Steiner, our Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer, Gerard Michel, our Chief Financial Officer and Dr. Alan Krasner, our Chief Medical
Officer. Dr. Steiner is an inventor of our VIAdel technology. The loss of the services of any of
these persons might impede the achievement of our research, development and commercialization
objectives. With the exception of Dr. Steiner, we currently do not have employment agreements with
any other executive officers. Replacing key employees may be difficult and time-consuming because
of the limited number of individuals in our industry with the skills and experiences required to
develop, gain regulatory approval of and commercialize our product candidates successfully. Other
than a $1 million key person insurance policy on Dr. Steiner, we do not have key person life
insurance to cover the loss of any of our other employees.
Recruiting and retaining qualified scientific personnel, clinical personnel and sales and
marketing personnel will also be critical to our success. We may not be able to attract and retain
these personnel on acceptable terms, if at all, given the competition among numerous pharmaceutical
and biotechnology companies for similar personnel. We also experience competition for the hiring of
scientific and clinical personnel from other companies, universities and research institutions. In
addition, we rely on consultants and advisors, including scientific and clinical advisors, to
assist us in formulating our research and development and commercialization strategy. Our
consultants and advisors may be employed by employers other than us and may have commitments under
consulting or advisory contracts with other entities that may limit their availability to us.
We may expand our development, regulatory and sales and marketing capabilities, and as a result,
we may encounter difficulties in managing our growth, which could disrupt our operations.
If our development and commercialization plans for VIAject® are successful, we may experience
significant growth in the number of our employees and the scope of our operations, particularly in
the areas of manufacturing, clinical trials management, and regulatory affairs. To manage our
anticipated future growth, we must continue to implement and improve our managerial, operational
and financial systems and continue to recruit and train additional qualified personnel. Due to our
limited financial resources we may not be able to effectively manage the expansion of our
operations or recruit and train additional qualified personnel. Any inability to manage growth
could delay the execution of our business plans or disrupt our operations.
Risks Related to Our Common Stock
Our executive officers, directors and principal stockholders have significant ability to control
all matters submitted to stockholders for approval.
Our executive officers, directors and principal stockholders, in the aggregate, beneficially
own shares representing approximately 39% of our outstanding capital stock. As a result, these
stockholders, if they act together, will be able to exercise a significant controlling influence
over matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of
significant corporate transactions, such as mergers, consolidations and sales of all or
substantially all of our assets, and will have significant control over our management and
policies. The interests of this group of stockholders may not always coincide with our corporate
interests or the interests of other stockholders. This significant concentration of stock ownership
could also result in the entrenchment of our management and adversely affect the price of our
common stock.
Provisions in our corporate charter documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of
us, which may be beneficial to our stockholders, more difficult and may prevent attempts by our
stockholders to replace or remove our current management.
33
Table of Contents
Provisions in our corporate charter and bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger,
acquisition or other change in control of us that stockholders may consider favorable, including
transactions in which you might otherwise receive a premium for your shares. These provisions could
also limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common
stock, thereby depressing the market price of our common stock. In addition, these provisions may
frustrate or prevent any attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management
by making it more difficult for stockholders to replace members of our board of directors. Because
our board of directors is responsible for appointing the members of our management team, these
provisions could in turn affect any attempt by our stockholders to replace current members of our
management team.
Among others, these provisions:
| establish a classified board of directors such that not all members of the board are elected at one time; | ||
| allow the authorized number of our directors to be changed only by resolution of our board of directors; | ||
| limit the manner in which stockholders can remove directors from the board; | ||
| establish advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals that can be acted on at stockholder meetings and nominations to our board of directors; | ||
| require that stockholder actions must be effected at a duly called stockholder meeting and prohibit actions by our stockholders by written consent; | ||
| limit who may call stockholder meetings; | ||
| authorize our board of directors to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval, which could be used to institute a stockholder rights plan or poison pill that would work to dilute the stock ownership of a potential hostile acquirer, effectively preventing acquisitions that have not been approved by our board of directors; and | ||
| require the approval of the holders of at least 75% of the votes that all our stockholders would be entitled to cast to amend or repeal certain provisions of our charter or bylaws. |
In addition, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which generally prohibits a person who owns in
excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock from merging or combining with us for a period of
three years after the date of the transaction in which the person acquired in excess of 15% of our
outstanding voting stock, unless the merger or combination is approved in a prescribed manner.
If our stock price is volatile, purchasers of our common stock could incur substantial losses.
Our stock price may be volatile. The stock market in general and the market for biotechnology
companies in particular have experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the
operating performance of particular companies. The market price for our common stock may be
influenced by many factors, including:
| results of clinical trials of our product candidates or those of our competitors; | ||
| regulatory or legal developments in the United States and other countries; | ||
| variations in our financial results or those of companies that are perceived to be similar to us; | ||
| developments or disputes concerning patents or other proprietary rights; | ||
| the recruitment or departure of key personnel; | ||
| changes in the structure of healthcare payment systems; | ||
| market conditions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors and issuance of new or changed securities analysts reports or recommendations; | ||
| general economic, industry and market conditions; and | ||
| the other factors described in this Risk Factors section. |
We have never paid any cash dividends on our capital stock and we do not anticipate paying any
cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
We have paid no cash dividends on our capital stock to date. We currently intend to retain our
future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of our business. In addition, the terms
of any future debt agreements may preclude us from paying dividends. As a result, we do not expect
to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future, and payment of cash dividends, if any, will
depend on our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and other factors
and will be at the discretion of our board of directors. Furthermore, we may in the future become
subject to contractual restrictions on, or prohibitions against, the payment of dividends. Capital
appreciation, if any, of our common stock will be investors sole source of gain for the
foreseeable future.
34
Table of Contents
A significant portion of our total outstanding shares are restricted from immediate resale but may
be sold into the market in the near future. This could cause the market price of our common stock
to drop significantly, even if our business is doing well.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could occur
at any time. These sales, or the perception in the market that the holders of a large number of
shares intend to sell shares, could reduce the market price of our common stock. As of January 28,
2010, we had approximately 24 million shares of common stock outstanding. Of these, approximately
10 million shares are able to be sold in accordance with the SECs Rule 144 and the remainder are
generally freely tradable without restriction under securities laws.
We incur substantial costs as a result of operating as a public company, and our management is
required to devote substantial time to comply with public company regulations.
We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 as well as other federal and state laws. These requirements may place a strain on our people,
systems and resources. The Exchange Act requires that we file annual, quarterly and current reports
with respect to our business and financial condition. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we
maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial
reporting. In order to maintain and improve the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures and internal controls over financial reporting, significant resources and management
oversight will be required. This may divert managements attention from other business concerns,
which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows.
35
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit No. | Description | |
10.1
|
Form Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for 2004 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan. | |
31.01
|
Chief Executive OfficerCertification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.02
|
Chief Financial OfficerCertification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.01
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerCertification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
36
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
BIODEL INC. |
||||
Dated: February 5, 2010 | By: | /s/ Gerard Michel | ||
Gerard Michel, Chief Financial Officer, | ||||
VP Corporate Development, and Treasurer |
37
Table of Contents
Exhibit No. | Description | |
10.1
|
Form Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for 2004 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan. | |
31.01
|
Chief Executive OfficerCertification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.02
|
Chief Financial OfficerCertification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.01
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerCertification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
38