ALICO, INC. - Annual Report: 2009 (Form 10-K)

 

 

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

þ		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 0-261

ALICO, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Florida		59-0906081
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation		(IRS Employer
or organization)		identification number)
P.O. Box 338, La Belle, Florida		33975
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number including area code (863) 675-2966

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:

		Name of each exchange
Title of class:		on which registered:
COMMON CAPITAL STOCK, $1.00 Par value, Non-cumulative		NASDAQ

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as define in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that such registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filings requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 or Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this form 10-K.

Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer þ		Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.)

Yes o No þ

The aggregate market value of the voting and nonvoting common equity held by non-affiliates based on the closing price, as quoted on the NASDAQ as of March 31, 2009 (the last business day of Alico’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was $84,948,192. There were 7,375,817 shares of stock outstanding at December 4, 2009.

Documents Incorporated by Reference:

Portions of the Proxy Statement of Registrant to be dated on or before January 20, 2010 are incorporated by reference in Part III of this report.

 

 

ALICO, INC.
FORM 10-K
For the year ended September 30, 2009

Part I
Item 1. Business			3
Item 1A. Risk factors			8
Item 1B. Unresolved staff comments			12
Item 2. Properties			13
Item 3. Legal Proceedings			14
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders			15
Part II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities			16
Item 6. Selected Financial Data			21
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			22
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk			36
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data			37
Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure			72
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures			72
Item 9B. Other information			73
Part III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance			74
Item 11. Executive Compensation			74
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters			74
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence			74
Item 14. Principal Accountants’ Fees and Services			74
Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules			74
Signatures			76
Exhibit 3(ii)(3)
Exhibit 14.1
Exhibit 14.2
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32.1
Exhibit 32.2

PART I

Item 1.		Business.

Alico, Inc. (the “Company”), which was formed February 29, 1960 as a spin-off of the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, is a land management company operating in Central and Southwest Florida. Alico’s primary asset is 135,466 acres of land located in Collier, Glades, Hendry, Lee and Polk Counties. (See Item 2 for location and acreage by current primary use.) Alico is involved in a variety of agribusiness pursuits in addition to land leasing and rentals, rock and sand mining and real estate sales activities.

Alico’s land is managed for multiple uses wherever possible. For example, cattle ranching, forestry and land leased for grazing, recreation and oil exploration utilize the same acreage in some instances.

The relative contributions of each operation to the operating revenue, profit and total assets of Alico during the past three years (all revenues are from external customers within the United States) are discussed under the caption “Reportable Segment Information” and in Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Alico’s retail land sales and development business is handled solely through its wholly owned subsidiary, Alico Land Development, Inc. (formerly known as Saddlebag Lake Resorts, Inc.). However, Alico has from time to time directly sold properties which, in the judgment of Management and the Board of Directors, were surplus to Alico’s primary operations. Additionally, Alico’s wholly owned subsidiary, Alico-Agri, Ltd., has also engaged in bulk land sales. Alico, through its subsidiary Alico Land Development, Inc., has recently taken actions to enhance the planning and strategic positioning of all Company owned land. These actions include seeking entitlement of Alico’s land assets in order to preserve rights should Alico choose to develop property in the future.

On September 28, 2007, the Board of Directors of Alico approved a change in Alico’s fiscal year end from August 31 to September 30. The fiscal year change was effective beginning with Alico’s 2008 fiscal year. Alico’s 2008 fiscal year began on October 1, 2007 and ended September 30, 2008, resulting in a one month transition period that began September 1, 2007 and ended September 30, 2007. Accordingly, information is presented for the years ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, the one month transition period ended September 30, 2007, and for the prior fiscal year ended August 31, 2007.

Subsidiary Operations

Alico has five wholly owned subsidiaries: Agri-Insurance Company, Ltd. (“Agri”), Alico-Agri, Ltd. (“Alico-Agri”), Alico Plant World, LLC (“Plant World”), Bowen Brothers Fruit LLC (“Bowen”), and Alico Land Development, Inc. (“ALDI”), formerly known as Saddlebag Lake Resort, Inc.

Agri

Agri is a Bermuda based captive insurer and was created to write crop insurance against catastrophic losses due to weather and disease. Agri provided crop insurance to Alico and other Florida based third parties during the years from 2000 to 2005. Due to several hurricanes which impacted the State of Florida during the fall of 2004 and 2005, Agri sustained losses related to its underwriting activities which caused Agri to suspend additional insuring activities pending an updated feasibility study of its insuring activities. Based on the findings of the study, along with the history of losses, Agri ceased issuing policies. Alico is currently working to dissolve Agri.

Alico-Agri

Alico-Agri, Ltd. was formed during fiscal year 2003 to manage the real estate holdings of Agri. Agri transferred all of its property holdings, consisting solely of the Lee County, Florida properties surrounding Florida Gulf Coast University, and the related contracts to Alico-Agri for a 99% partnership interest. Alico, the managing partner, transferred cash for a 1% interest in the partnership. Upon the dissolution of Agri, the partnership interest in Alico-Agri will be transferred to ALDI.

Plant World

In September 2004, Alico, through Alico-Agri, purchased the assets of La Belle Plant World, Inc. a wholesale grower and shipper of vegetable transplants to commercial farmers. The purchase price was $4.9 million for the land, office building, greenhouses and associated equipment. Alico Plant World, LLC was set up as a wholly owned subsidiary of Alico-Agri, Ltd. Due to ongoing losses sustained by Plant World, Alico discontinued the transplant operations in June 2008 and is currently leasing Plant World’s facilities to an outside nursery operation.

Bowen

Bowen provides harvesting, hauling and marketing services to Alico and other outside citrus growers in the state of Florida.

ALDI

ALDI has been active in the subdivision, development and sale of real estate since its inception in 1971. ALDI has developed and sold two subdivisions near Frostproof, Florida. Through its ALDI subsidiary, Alico has recently taken actions to enhance the planning and strategic positioning of all Company owned land. These actions include seeking entitlement of Alico’s land assets in order to preserve rights should Alico choose to develop property in the future.

The financial results of the operations of these subsidiaries are consolidated with those of Alico. Intercompany activities and balances are eliminated in consolidation. (See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.)

Segments

Alico engages in a variety of agricultural pursuits as well as other land management activities. For information concerning the revenues, gross profits and assets attributable to each business segment please refer to Note 10 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Agricultural Operations

The table below outlines the relative contribution to operating revenue by each of the Company’s segments for the past three fiscal years:

		Fiscal year ended September 30,								Fiscal year ended
		2009				2008				August 31, 2007
Bowen			31	%			39	%			40	%
Citrus			40	%			35	%			36	%
Sugarcane			9	%			8	%			7	%
Cattle			9	%			6	%			8	%
Vegetables			5	%			5	%			3	%
Other agriculture			1	%			2	%			1	%
Total Agriculture			95	%			95	%			95	%
Real estate			2	%			3	%			3	%
Non agriculture			3	%			2	%			2	%
Total Operating revenue			100	%			100	%			100	%

Bowen Brothers

Bowen’s operations include harvesting, hauling and marketing citrus for both Alico and other growers in the state of Florida. Bowen’s operations also include the purchase and resale of citrus fruit. Bowen Brothers was purchased in February 2006 to provide Alico with additional citrus marketing expertise and the ability to harvest its own citrus crop.

Citrus Groves

Alico’s Citrus Grove operations consist of cultivating citrus trees in order to produce citrus for delivery to the fresh and processed citrus markets in the state of Florida. Approximately 10,552 acres of citrus were grown and harvested during the 2008-09 season. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, Alico sold approximately 39% of its citrus crop to Southern Gardens, a wholly owned subsidiary of U.S. Sugar Corporation (USSC). The balance of the sales concentration is attributable to citrus contracts with Florida Orange Marketers, Inc. which represented approximately 29% of Alico’s citrus sales and Cutrale, which represented approximately 29% of the Alico’s citrus sales. While Alico believes that it can replace these arrangements with other marketing alternatives, it may not be able to do so quickly and the results may not be as favorable as the current contracts.

Sugarcane

Alico’s sugarcane operations consist of cultivating raw sugarcane for sale to a sugar processor. The crop is harvested by a co-op, proportionately owned by sugarcane growers, including Alico. Alico had 8,307 acres, 9,110 acres and 10,254 acres of sugarcane in production during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007, respectively. Since the inception of its sugarcane program in 1988, Alico has sold 100% of its product through a pooling agreement with USSC, a local Florida sugar mill. Under the terms of the pooling agreement, Alico’s sugarcane is processed and sold along with sugarcane from other growers. The proceeds, less costs and a profit margin, are distributed on a pro rata basis as the finished product is sold. Due to the location of the Company’s sugarcane fields relative to location of alternative processing plants, the loss of USSC as a customer would have a negative material impact on the Company’s sugarcane operations.

Cattle

Alico’s cattle operations, located in Hendry and Collier Counties, Florida, is engaged primarily in the production of beef cattle, feeding cattle at western feedlots and the raising of replacement heifers. The breeding herd consists of approximately 10,189 cows, bulls and replacement heifers. Approximately 53% of the herd is from one to five years old, while the remaining 47% is at least six years old. Alico primarily sells to packing and processing plants in the United States. Alico also sells cattle through local livestock auction markets and to contract cattle buyers in the United States. These buyers provide ready markets for Alico’s cattle. In the opinion of Management, the loss of any one or a few of these processing plants and/or buyers would not have a material adverse effect on Alico’s cattle operation.

Vegetables

In the fiscal year ended August 31, 2006 Alico began growing corn and beans for delivery to local packing facilities. Alico has marketing agreements for its vegetable products through local packing facilities and brokers in the state of Florida for sale to wholesale and retail outlets in the United States. In the opinion of Management, the loss of any one or a few of these facilities or brokers would not have a material adverse effect on Alico’s vegetable operation.

Other Agricultural Operations

Alico is also engaged in the sale of native sod, and other native plants and trees for landscaping purposes. The sale of these products is not significant to the overall revenue or profitability of the Company.

Real Estate

ALDI has been active in the subdivision, development and sale of real estate since its inception in 1971. ALDI has developed and sold two subdivisions near Frostproof, Florida. Through its ALDI subsidiary, Alico has developed a plan to enhance the planning and strategic positioning of all Company owned land. These actions include seeking entitlement of Alico’s land assets in order to preserve rights should Alico choose to develop property in the future.

Non Agricultural Operations

Land Rentals for Grazing, Agricultural, Oil Exploration and Other Uses

Alico rents land to others on a tenant-at-will basis, for grazing, farming, oil exploration and recreational uses. Alico will continue to develop additional land to lease for farming as strategically advantageous and according to demand. There were no significant changes in the method of rental for these properties during the past fiscal year.

Mining Operations: Rock and Sand

In May 2006, Alico acquired a 526 acre mine site for rock and fill in Glades County, Florida. Rock and sand reserves are depleted and charged to cost of goods sold proportionately as the property is mined. Additionally, ALDI is currently seeking a permit for two rock mines in Hendry and Lee Counties. Operating revenue and profits from mining operations have not been significant to the Company during the past three fiscal years but may increase as additional properties are permitted and become operational in the future.

Competition

As indicated, Alico is primarily engaged in a variety of agricultural and nonagricultural activities, all of which are in highly competitive markets. For instance, citrus is grown in foreign countries and several states, the most notable of which are: Brazil, Florida, California, and Texas. Beef cattle are produced throughout the United States and domestic beef sales also compete with imported beef. Sugarcane products compete with products from sugar beets in the United States as well as imported sugar and sugar products from foreign countries. Vegetables are produced throughout the United States, as is sod. Forest and rock products are produced in most parts of the United States. Leasing of land is also widespread.

Alico’s share of each of the United States markets for citrus, sugarcane, cattle, vegetables, sod, mining and forest products is less than 3%.

Environmental Regulations

Alico’s operations are subject to various federal, state and local laws regulating the discharge of materials into the environment. Management believes Alico is in compliance with all such rules and such compliance has not had a material effect upon capital expenditures, earnings or Alico’s competitive position.

While compliance with environmental regulations has not had a material economic effect on Alico’s operations, executive officers are required to spend a considerable amount of time monitoring these matters. In addition, there are ongoing costs incurred in complying with permitting and reporting requirements.

Employees

At September 30, 2009, Alico and its subsidiaries had a total of 161 full-time employees classified as follows: Bowen 13; Citrus 82; Sugarcane 12; Ranch 7; Vegetables 12; Real Estate 2; Leasing 3; Facilities Maintenance Support 12; General and Administrative 18. Management is not aware of any efforts by employees or outside organizers to create any type of labor union. Management believes that the employer/employee relationship environment is such that labor organization activities are unlikely to occur.

Seasonal Nature of Business

As with any agribusiness enterprise, Alico’s business operations are predominantly seasonal in nature. The harvest and sale of citrus fruit generally occurs in all quarters, but is more concentrated during the first, second and third fiscal quarters. Sugarcane is harvested during the first and second fiscal quarters. Vegetable harvest and sales generally occur in the first, second and third fiscal quarters. Other segments of Alico’s business such as its cattle and sod sales, mining and leasing operations, tend to be recurring rather than seasonal in nature.

Capital resources and raw materials

Management believes that Alico will be able to meet its working capital requirements for the foreseeable future through internally generated funds and credit availability. Alico has credit commitments that provide for revolving credit that is available for Alico’s general use. Raw materials needed to propagate the various crops grown by Alico which consist primarily of fertilizer, herbicides, insecticides, fuel and water are readily available from local sources.

Available Information

Alico’s internet address is: http://www.alicoinc.com. As required by SEC rules and regulations, Alico files reports with the SEC on Form 8-K, Form 10-Q, Form 10-K and the annual proxy statement. These reports are available to the public to read and copy at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.

Alico is an electronic filer with the SEC and these reports are also available through the SEC internet site (http://www.sec.gov), and through Alico’s website as soon as reasonably practicable after filing with the SEC. Copies of documents filed with the SEC are also available free of charge upon request.

Item 1A.		Risk Factors.

Alico’s operations involve varying degrees of risk and each investor should consider the specific risks and speculative features inherent in and affecting the business of Alico before investing in Alico. In considering the following risk and speculative factors, an investor should realize that there is a possibility of losing his or her entire investment.

Alico’s financial condition and results of operations could be affected by the risk factors discussed below. These factors may also cause actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward looking statements in Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

The list of risks below is not intended to be all inclusive. A complete listing of risks is beyond the scope of this document. However, in contemplating the financial position and results of operations of Alico, investors should carefully consider, among other factors, the following risk factors:

General

Alico has a 51% stockholder and a limited public float which could adversely affect the price of its stock and restrict the ability of the minority shareholders to have a voice in corporate governance.

Atlantic Blue Group, Inc. (“Atlanticblue”) (formerly Atlantic Blue Trust, Inc.) is the owner of approximately 51% of Alico’s common stock. Accordingly, Alico’s common stock is thinly traded and its market price may fluctuate significantly more than stocks with a larger public float. Additionally by virtue of its ownership percentage, Atlanticblue is able to elect all directors and, consequently, is deemed to control Alico. While Atlanticblue has issued a governance letter dated December 3, 2009 reaffirming its commitment to maintaining a majority of independent directors on Alico’s Board of Directors, this commitment may be terminated at any time upon 30 days prior written notice. Alico does not have cumulative voting. Accordingly, stockholders of Alico other than Atlanticblue have no effective control over who the management and directors of Alico are or will be.

Alico manages its properties in an attempt to capture its highest and best use and customarily does not sell property until it determines that the property is surplus to its agricultural activities by reason of its potential for industrial, commercial or residential use. Alico has little control over when this occurs as real estate sales are primarily market driven.

Alico’s goal for its land management program is to manage and selectively improve its lands for their most profitable use. To this end, Alico continually evaluates its properties focusing on soil capabilities, subsurface composition, topography, transportation, availability of markets for its crops and the climatic characteristics of each of the tracts. While Alico is primarily engaged in agricultural activities, when land is determined to be better suited to industrial, commercial or residential use, Alico has classified the property as surplus to its agricultural activities and sold it. Alico’s land management strategy is thus a long term strategy to acquire, hold and manage land for its best use, selling surplus land at opportune times and in a manner that would maximize Alico’s profits from such surplus tracts. The timing for when agricultural lands become best suited for industrial, commercial or residential use depends upon a number of factors which are beyond the control of Alico such as:

•		population migration;
•		national, regional and local economic conditions;
•		conditions in local real estate markets (e.g., supply of land versus demand);
•		competition from other available property;
•		current level of, or potential availability of roads and utilities;
•		availability of governmental entitlements;

•		government regulation and changes in real estate, zoning, land use, environmental or tax laws;
•		interest rates and the availability of financing, and;
•		potential liability under environmental and other laws.

Alico is not able to predict when its properties will become best suited for non-agricultural use and has limited ability to influence this process. Additionally, changes from time to time in any or a combination of these factors could result in delays in sales, Alico’s ability to sell tracts which are determined to be surplus or its ability to realize optimum pricing from such sales.

Alico carries large receivables from seller-financed sales of large tracts of surplus land the collectability of which is subject to credit risk relating to debtors.

The Company’s sale of surplus lands often involves buyer financing provided by the Company. In addition to the cash deposit paid by a buyer of surplus land, the Company at times takes a mortgage for the unpaid balance of the purchase price of the land sales contract. The collectability of the amounts owed is dependent on the creditworthiness of the mortgagors, which often depends upon their continued financial success. The purchasers of the surplus tracts are often developers, whose success is in turn directly affected by multiple factors in the national and local real estate markets, including but not limited to interest rates, demand for housing, competition from other available land, governmental regulation, permitting, and unanticipated costs of construction. Depending on the magnitude of its debt to the Company, a mortgagor’s default on a sales contract or the bankruptcy of any material purchaser of surplus land could have a materially adverse effect on the Company. Additionally, if a borrower defaults on a secured property and the Company repossesses the property, the Company cannot predict, under the current real estate market conditions, if the repossessed property can be sold in the near term or, if the Company is able to sell the repossessed property, if such sale will result in a gain equal to the anticipated gain under the original sales contract for such property. Currently Alico-Agri is foreclosing on a mortgage on a tract involving 4,528 acres in Lee County, Florida with an outstanding balance of $52.2 million. This foreclosure is being contested. If Alico-Agri is successful in foreclosing on this tract, it does not believe that it will be able to obtain a deficiency judgment for the amount owed, which may be in excess of the value of the foreclosed property at the time of foreclosure.

Alico is subject to environmental liability by virtue of owning significant holdings of real estate assets.

Alico faces a potential for environmental liability by virtue of its ownership of real property. If hazardous substances (including herbicides and pesticides used by Alico or by any persons leasing Alico’s lands) are discovered on or emanating from any of Alico’s lands and the release of such substances presents a threat of harm to the public health or the environment, Alico may be held strictly liable for the cost of remediation of these hazardous substances. In addition, environmental laws that apply to a given site can vary greatly according to the site’s location, its present and former uses, and other factors such as the presence of wetlands or endangered species on the site. Although Alico purchases insurance when it is available for environmental liability, these insurance contracts may not be adequate to cover such costs or damages or may not continue to be available to Alico at prices and terms that would be satisfactory. It is possible that in some cases the cost of compliance with these environmental laws could exceed the value of a particular tract of land or be significant enough that it would have a materially adverse effect on Alico.

Alico has a large customer that accounts for 24% of revenues.

For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, Alico’s largest customer, U.S. Sugar Corporation (USSC) for whom Alico grows sugarcane, accounted for approximately 24% of operating revenue. Additionally, Alico sells citrus to Southern Gardens, a wholly owned subsidiary of USSC. These marketing arrangements involve marketing pools which allow the contracting party to market Alico’s product in conjunction with the product of other entities in the pool and pay Alico a proportionate share of the resulting revenue from the sale of the entire pooled product. While Alico believes that it can replace these arrangements with other marketing alternatives, it may not be able to do so quickly and the results may not be as favorable as the current contracts.

Agricultural Risks — General

Agricultural operations generate a large portion of Alico’s revenues. Agriculture operations are subject to a wide variety of risks including product pricing due to variations in supply and demand, weather, disease, input costs and product liability.

Agricultural products are subject to supply and demand pricing which is not predictable.

Because Alico’s agricultural products are commodities, Alico is not able to predict with certainty what price it will receive for its products; however, its costs are relatively fixed. Additionally, the growth cycle of such products in many instances dictates when such products must be marketed which may or may not be advantageous in obtaining the best price. Excessive supplies tend to cause severe price competition and lower prices throughout the industry affected. Conversely, shortages may cause higher prices. Shortages often result from adverse growing conditions which can reduce the available product of growers in affected growing areas while not affecting others in non-affected growing areas. Since multiple variables which can affect pricing are incurred before pricing and supply are known, Alico cannot accurately predict or control from year to year what its profits or losses from agricultural operations will be.

Alico’s agricultural assets are concentrated and the effects of adverse weather conditions such as hurricanes can be magnified.

Alico’s agricultural operations are concentrated in south Florida counties with more than 80% of its agricultural lands located in a contiguous parcel in Hendry County. All of these areas are subject to occasional periods of drought, excess rain, flooding, and freeze. Crops require water in different quantities at different times during the growth cycle. Accordingly, too much or too little water at any given point can adversely impact production. While Alico attempts to mitigate controllable weather risks through water management and crop selection, its ability to do so is limited. Alico’s operations in southern and central Florida are also subject to the risk of hurricanes. Hurricanes have the potential to destroy crops and impact citrus production through the loss of fruit and destruction of trees either as a result of high winds or through the spread of wind blown disease. Alico was impacted by hurricanes during fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004 and sustained losses relating to the storms during all three of those fiscal years. Alico seeks to minimize hurricane risk by the purchase of insurance contracts, but a portion of Alico’s crops remain uninsured. Because Alico’s agricultural properties are located in relative close proximity to each other, the impact of adverse weather conditions may be magnified in Alico’s results of operations.

Water Use Regulation restricts Alico’s access to water for agricultural use.

Alico’s agricultural operations are dependent upon the availability of adequate surface and underground water needed to produce its crops. The availability of water for use in irrigation is regulated by the State of Florida through water management districts which have jurisdiction over various geographic regions in which Alico’s lands are located. Currently, Alico has permits for the use of underground and surface water which are adequate for its agricultural needs. Surface water in Hendry County, where much of Alico’s agricultural land is located, comes from Lake Okeechobee via the Caloosahatchee River and the system of canals used to irrigate such land. Since the Army Corps of Engineers controls the level of Lake Okeechobee, this organization ultimately determines the availability of surface water even though the use of water has been permitted by the State of Florida through the water management district. The Army Corps of Engineers previously decided to lower the permissible level of Lake Okeechobee in response to concerns about the ability of the levees surrounding the lake to restrain rising waters which could result from hurricanes. Changes in permitting for underground or surface water use during times of drought, because of lower lake levels, may result in shortages of water for agricultural use by Alico and could have a materially adverse effect on Alico’s agricultural operations and financial results.

Alico’s citrus groves are subject to damage and loss from disease including but not limited to Citrus Canker and Citrus Greening diseases.

Alico’s citrus groves are subject to damage and loss from diseases such as Citrus Canker and Citrus Greening. Each of these diseases is widespread in Florida and Alico has found instances of Citrus Canker and/or Citrus Greening in several of its groves. Both diseases are present in areas where Company groves are located. There is no known cure for Citrus Canker at the present time although some pesticides inhibit the development of the disease. The disease is spread by contact with infected trees or by wind blown transmission. Alico’s policy is to destroy trees which become infected with this disease or with Citrus Greening disease. Alico maintains an inspection program to discover infestations early. Citrus Greening destroys infected trees and is spread by psyllids. Alico utilizes a pesticide program to control these hosts. At the present time, there is no known pesticide or other treatment for Citrus Greening once trees are infected. Both of these diseases pose a significant threat to the Florida Citrus industry and to Alico’s citrus groves. Wide spread dissemination of these diseases in Alico’s groves could cause a material adverse effect to Alico’s operating results and citrus grove assets.

Pesticide and herbicide use by Alico or its lessees could create liability for Alico.

Alico and some of the parties to whom Alico leases land for agricultural purposes, use herbicides, pesticides and other hazardous substances in the operation of their businesses. All pesticides and herbicides used by Alico have been approved for use by the proper governmental agencies with the hazards attributable to each substance appropriately labeled and described. Alico maintains policies requiring its employees to apply such chemicals strictly in accordance with the labeling. However, Alico does not have any knowledge or control over the chemicals used by third parties who lease Alico’s lands for cultivation. It is possible that some of these herbicides and pesticides could be harmful to humans if used improperly, or that there may be unknown hazards associated with such chemicals despite any contrary government or manufacturer labels. Alico might have to pay the costs or damages associated with the improper application, accidental release or the use or misuse of such substances.

Changes in immigration laws or enforcement of such laws could impact the ability of Alico to harvest its crops.

Alico engages third parties to provide personnel for its harvesting operations. The personnel engaged by such third parties could be from pools composed of immigrant labor. The availability and number of such workers is subject to decrease if there are changes in the U.S. immigration laws or by stricter enforcement of such laws. The scarcity of available personnel to harvest Alico’s agricultural products could cause Alico’s harvesting costs to increase or could lead to the loss of product that is not timely harvested which could have a materially adverse effect upon Alico.

Changing public perceptions regarding the quality, safety or health risks of Alico’s agricultural products can affect demand and pricing of such products.

The general public’s perception regarding the quality, safety or health risks associated with particular food crops Alico grows and sells could reduce demand and prices for some of Alico’s products. To the extent that consumer preferences evolve away from products Alico produces for health or other reasons, and Alico is unable to modify its products or to develop products that satisfy new customer preferences, there could be decreased demand for Alico’s products. Even if market prices are unfavorable, produce items which are ready to be or have been harvested must be brought to market. Additionally, Alico has significant investments in its citrus groves and cannot easily shift to alternative products for this land. A decrease in the selling price received for Alico’s products due to the factors described above could have a materially adverse effect on Alico.

Alico faces significant competition in its agricultural operations.

Alico faces significant competition in its agricultural operations both from domestic and foreign producers and does not have any branded products. Foreign growers generally have a lower cost of production, less environmental regulation and in some instances greater resources and market flexibility than Alico. Because foreign growers have great flexibility as to when they enter the U.S. market, Alico cannot always predict the impact these competitors will have on its business and results of operations. The competition Alico faces from foreign suppliers of sugar and orange juice is mitigated by quota restriction on sugar imports imposed by the U.S. government and by a governmentally imposed tariff on U.S. orange imports. A change in the government’s sugar policy allowing more imports or a reduction in the U.S. orange juice tariff would adversely impact Alico’s results of operations.

Item 1B.		Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2.		Properties.

At September 30, 2009, Alico owned a total of 135,466 acres of land located in five counties in Florida. Acreage in each county and the primary classification with respect to the present use of these properties is shown in the following table:

Alico, Inc. & Subsidiaries
Land Use Summary
September 30, 2009

		Total				Hendry(1)				Polk				Collier				Glades				Lee
Citrus:
Producing acres			10,552				3,018				3,405				4,129				—				—
Support and nonproductive(2)			6,333				2,347				789				3,197				—				—
Total Citrus			16,885				5,365				4,194				7,326				—				—
Sugarcane:
Producing acres			8,307				8,307				—				—				—				—
Support and nonproductive(2)			7,715				7,715				—				—				—				—
Total Sugarcane			16,022				16,022				—				—				—				—
Ranch:
Improved pasture			21,201				20,906				295				—				—				—
Semi-improved pasture			21,752				20,038				602				1,112				—				—
Native pasture			19,513				11,846				5,949				1,718				—				—
Support and nonproductive(2)			13,583				12,527				376				680				—				—
Total Ranch			76,049				65,317				7,222				3,510				—				—
Farming:
Productive acres			5,521				5,521				—				—				—				—
Support and nonproductive(2)			17,479				17,479				—				—				—				—
Total Farming			23,000				23,000				—				—				—				—
Sod:
Producing acres			1,540				1,540				—				—				—				—
Support and nonproductive(2)			363				363				—				—				—				—
Total Sod			1,903				1,903				—				—				—				—
Rock and Sand Mining			526				—				—				—				526				—
Commercial & Residential			1,081				54				66				—				—				961
Total			135,466				111,661				11,482				10,836				526				961

Of the above lands, Alico utilizes approximately 21,000 acres of improved pasture plus approximately 42,000 acres of semi-improved and native pasture for cattle production. Much of the land is also leased for multi-purpose use such as oil exploration, farming and recreation.

From the inception of Alico’s predecessor’s initial development program in 1948, one of the Company’s goals has been to develop the lands for their most profitable use. Prior to implementation of the development program, detailed studies were made of the properties focusing on soil capabilities, topography, transportation, availability of markets and the climatic characteristics of each of the tracts. Based on these and later studies, the use of each tract was determined. Management believes that Alico lands are suitable for agricultural, residential and commercial uses. In the past, some of the land was considered surplus to the agricultural needs of Alico and, as indicated under Item 1 of this report, sales of such surplus property were made from time to time.

Alico utilizes consultants to work with senior management and the Board of Directors to enhance the planning and strategic positioning of all Company owned land. ALDI also oversees the entitlement of Alico’s land assets in order to preserve these rights should Alico choose to develop the property in the future.

Management believes that each of the major agricultural programs is adequately supported by equipment, buildings, fences, irrigation systems, drainage systems and other amenities required for the operation of the projects.

Item 3.		Legal proceedings.

In June 2008, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued a final Settlement Agreement regarding audits of Alico for the tax years 2000 through 2004. Pursuant to the agreement, Alico and the IRS agreed to final taxes resulting from the audits of $41.1 million, penalties of $4.1 million and interest of $20.0 million. Alico also paid State income taxes related to the final IRS settlement of $6.2 million along with $4.3 million of related interest. The Settlement Agreement concluded that Alico must recognize unreported gains resulting from the transfer of real property to a foreign subsidiary (Agri). The real estate was originally transferred and reported at its historical cost basis. Additionally, Alico must recognize Subpart F income related to Agri’s earnings. Alico had not previously recognized income related to the transactions referenced above based on reliance on an IRS determination letter stating that Agri was a captive insurer, exempt from taxes provided certain procedural requirements were followed. Alico believed that it had followed such requirements, while the IRS ruled otherwise.

On October 29, 2008 Alico was served with a shareholder derivative action complaint filed by Baxter Troutman against JD Alexander and John R. Alexander which names Alico as a nominal defendant. Mr. Troutman is the cousin and nephew of the two defendants, respectively, and is a shareholder in Atlanticblue, a (51%) shareholder of Alico. From February 26, 2004 until January 18, 2008 Mr. Troutman was a director of Alico. The complaint alleges that JD Alexander and John R. Alexander committed breaches of fiduciary duty in connection with a proposed merger of Atlanticblue into Alico which was proposed in 2004 and withdrawn by Atlanticblue in 2005. The suit also alleges, among other things, that the merger proposal was wrongly requested by defendants JD Alexander and John R. Alexander and improperly included a proposed special dividend; and that the Alexanders’ sought to circumvent the Board’s nominating process to ensure that they constituted a substantial part of Alico’s senior management team and these actions were contrary to the position of Alico’s independent directors at the time causing a waste of Alico’s funds and the resignations of the independent directors in 2005. As a result the complaint is seeking damages to be paid to Alico by the Alexanders’ in excess of $1,000,000. The complaint concedes that Mr. Troutman has not previously made demand upon Alico to take action for the alleged wrongdoing as required by Florida law alleging that he believed such a demand would be futile. A copy of the Complaint may be obtained from the Clerk of the Circuit Court in Polk County, Florida.

On June 3, 2009 a Special Committee of Alico’s Board of Directors comprised entirely of Independent Directors and which was constituted to investigate the shareholder derivative action filed by Mr. Troutman, completed its investigation with the assistance of independent legal counsel, and determined that it would not be in Alico’s best interest to pursue such litigation. Alico has filed a motion to dismiss the litigation based upon the findings of the Special Committee. A copy of the report was filed with the Court and it and the other pleadings in the case are available from the Clerk of Circuit Court in Polk County, Florida by reference to the matter of Baxter G. Troutman, Plaintiff vs. John R. Alexander, John D. Alexander, Defendants and Alico, Inc. Nominal Defendant, Case No. 08-CA-10178 Circuit Court, 10^th Judicial Circuit, Polk County, Florida.

Item 4.		Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

None.

PART II

Item 5.		Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Common Stock Prices

The common stock of Alico, Inc. is traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market, LLC (“NASDAQ”) under the symbol ALCO. The high and low prices as reported by NASDAQ, by fiscal quarter, during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 are presented below:

		2009								2008
		Price								Price
		High				Low				High				Low
First Quarter		$	47.85			$	22.34			$	51.13			$	35.35
Second Quarter		$	45.02			$	20.24			$	45.62			$	35.44
Third Quarter		$	30.73			$	23.25			$	45.48			$	33.14
Fourth Quarter		$	33.94			$	26.29			$	50.32			$	33.90

Approximate Number of Holders of Common Stock

As of October 31, 2009 there were approximately 382 holders of record of Alico’s Common Stock as reported by Alico’s transfer agent.

Dividend Information

Dividends declared during the last two fiscal years were as follows:

Record Date		Payment Date		Amount Paid Per Share
April 30, 2008		May 16, 2008		$	0.275
July 31, 2008		August 15, 2008		$	0.275
October 31, 2008		November 14, 2008		$	0.275
January 30, 2009		February 15, 2009		$	0.275
April 30, 2009		May 15, 2009		$	0.1375
July 31, 2009		August 15, 2009		$	0.1375
October 31, 2009		November 13, 2009		$	0.1375

At a Board of Directors meeting held on October 30, 2009 the Directors deferred the consideration of a quarterly dividend.

Alico’s ability to pay dividends in the immediate future is dependent on a variety of factors including earnings and the financial condition of Alico. For a discussion of these factors, see Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Equity Compensation Arrangements

On November 3, 1998, Alico adopted the Alico, Inc. Incentive Equity Plan (the 1998 plan) pursuant to which the Board of Directors could grant options, stock appreciation rights and/or restricted stock to certain directors and employees. The 1998 Plan authorized grants of shares or options to purchase up to 650,000 shares of authorized but unissued common stock. This plan expired on November 3, 2008.

On February 20, 2009 Alico adopted the Alico, Inc., Incentive Equity Plan (The 2008 Plan) pursuant to which the Board of Directors of Alico may grant options, stock appreciation rights, and/or restricted stock to certain directors and employees. The Plan authorized grants of shares or options to purchase up to 350,000 shares of authorized but unissued common stock to be funded by treasury purchases. Details of the plan are more fully described in the Company’s proxy statement filed on January 23, 2009.

On October 27, 2006, the Board awarded 20,000 shares of restricted stock to the Chief Executive Officer under the 1998 Plan as additional compensation. Under the terms of the agreement, 4,000 shares vested effective August 31, 2006, 4,000 vested effective August 31, 2007 and the remaining 12,000 shares vested upon the CEO’s retirement on June 30, 2008. The fair value per share was $61.96 on the date of the award.

During November 2007, the CEO and COO elected to receive a portion of their annual incentive bonus in Company stock. The CEO chose to receive 4,000 shares at a value of $177 thousand, while the COO chose to receive 500 shares at a value of $22 thousand. These shares were issued under the 1998 plan. Compensation expense for these awards was accrued and recognized during the fourth quarter of Alico’s fiscal 2007 year.

A grant of 25,562 restricted shares was made to four senior executives in January 2008 under the 1998 Plan with a fair value of $40.67 per share, in order to replace previous retirement benefits granted. 7,707 of the shares granted in January 2008 related to previously vested retirement benefits and vested immediately. In January 2009, a total of 3,571 shares vested and the shares were issued from treasury stock. The remaining 14,284 shares granted in January 2008 vest 25% annually in January of each year until fully vested.

On September 30, 2008, Alico, hired a President for its subsidiary ALDI. As a portion of the total compensation package, the Board awarded 7,500 shares of restricted stock under the 1998 Plan. Under the terms of the agreement, the shares will vest 20% on September 30, 2010 and continue to vest 20% per year until they are fully vested. The fair value per share was $47.43 on the date of the award.

No stock options or stock appreciation rights have been granted since February 2004. There were no outstanding stock options or appreciation rights outstanding at September 30, 2009.

Number of securities

Number of

Weighted

remaining available for

Securities to be

average exercise

future issuance under

issued upon

price of

equity compensation

exercise of

outstanding

plans (excluding

outstanding options,

options, warrants

securities reflected in

warrants and rights

and rights

Column (a))

Plan Category

[a]

[b]

[c]

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

—

—

344,500

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

—

—

—

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

In order to fund restricted stock grants pursuant to its Incentive Equity plans for the purpose of providing restricted stock to eligible Directors and Senior Management and to align their interests with those of the Company shareholders, the table below summarizes treasury purchases during the last two fiscal years (in whole dollars):

										Total Shares
										Purchased as Part of
		Total Number of				Average price				Publicly Announced				Total Dollar value of
Date		Shares Purchased				paid per share				Plans or Programs				shares purchased
November 2007			12,000			$	43.97				55,770			$	527,699
March 2008			6,200			$	44.24				61,970			$	274,268
May 2008			9,768			$	40.32				71,738			$	393,851
December 2008			15,733			$	38.37				87,471			$	603,611
January 2009			4,267			$	41.67				91,738			$	177,807
February 2009			2,500			$	28.38				94,238			$	70,948
May 2009			3,000			$	27.21				97,238			$	81,643

The stock repurchases began in November 2005 and will be made on a quarterly basis until November 1, 2013 through open market transactions. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased will depend on a variety of factors including price, corporate and regulatory requirements and other market conditions. All purchases will be made subject to restrictions of Rule 10b-18 relating to volume, price and timing so as to minimize the impact of the purchases upon the market for the Company’s shares.

The Company does not anticipate that any purchases under the 2008 Plan will be made from any officer, director or control person. There are currently no arrangements with any person for the purchase of the shares. Alico may purchase an additional 344,500 shares in accordance with the authorization. Pursuant to approved plans, Alico purchased 3,000, 6,767 and 15,733 shares in the open market during the third, second and first quarter of fiscal year 2009, respectively, at a weighted average price of $36.63 per share.

There were no purchases of common stock of Alico made during the three months ended September 30, 2009 by Alico or any “affiliated purchaser” of Alico as defined in rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act.

Alico Performance

The graph below represents the Company’s common stock performance, comparing the value of $100 invested on September 1, 2004 in the Company’s common stock, the S&P 500 and a Company-constructed peer group.

Total Return To Shareholders
(Includes reinvestment of dividends)

		ANNUAL RETURN PERCENTAGE
		Years Ending
Company Name / Index		Aug. 05				Aug. 06				Aug. 07				Aug. 08				Sep. 09
Alico, Inc.			20.40				15.39				-11.28				-13.32				-30.08
S&P 500 Index			12.56				8.88				15.13				-11.14				-15.20
New Peer Group			58.83				-26.65				-21.12				-1.34				-24.11
Old Peer Group			56.59				-27.71				-27.92				2.34				-23.82

		Base				INDEXED RETURNS
		Period				Years Ending
Company Name / Index		Aug. 04				Aug. 05				Aug. 06				Aug. 07				Aug. 08				Sep. 09
Alico, Inc.			100				120.40				138.93				123.26				106.85				74.71
S&P 500 Index			100				112.56				122.55				141.10				125.38				106.32
New Peer Group			100				158.83				116.49				91.89				90.66				68.80
Old Peer Group			100				156.59				113.19				81.59				83.50				63.61

New Peer Group Companies		Old Peer Group Companies
CONSOLIDATED TOMOKA LAND CO		CONSOLIDATED TOMOKA LAND CO
ST JOE CO		ST JOE CO
TEJON RANCH CO		TEJON RANCH CO
TEXAS PACIFIC LAND TRUST		THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP
THOMAS PROPERTIES GROUP

Item 6.		Selected Financial Data.

		Fiscal Years Ended								One Month Ended				Fiscal
		September 30,								September 30,				Years Ended August 31,
Description		2009				2008				2007 (1)				2007				2006				2005
		(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
Operating revenue		$	89,528			$	116,382			$	758			$	132,005			$	74,164			$	52,938
Income (loss) from continuing operations			(3,649	)			5,603				(849	)			(13,395	)			8,021				6,260
Income (loss) from continuing operations per weighted average common share		$	(0.50	)		$	0.76			$	(0.12	)		$	(1.82	)		$	1.09			$	0.85
Average Number of Shares Outstanding			7,368				7,367				7,358				7,369				7,368				7,331
Cash Dividend Declared Per Share			0.69				1.10				0.28				1.10				1.03				1.25
Total Assets			200,235				273,932				285,349				281,206				263,579				248,306
Long-Term Obligations			80,715				140,239				143,265				143,790				103,601				85,826

Alico, through its subsidiary Bowen, purchased the assets of Bowen Brothers Fruit Co., Inc. for $1.9 million in February 2006. The purchase was made to provide Alico with additional citrus marketing expertise and the ability to harvest its own citrus crop. Operating revenue, income, assets and long-term obligations from Bowen have been included beginning in fiscal year ended August 31, 2006. For further information concerning Bowen’s operations and assets please refer to Note 10 of the consolidated financial statements.

During the fiscal year ended August 31, 2007 the Company revised its estimate in connection with a tax disagreement with the IRS which resulted in additional income tax expense of $25.6 million for that fiscal year. The effect of this transaction was to reduce income from continuing operations. Additionally, the Company utilized its revolving line of credit for funding to settle the dispute, causing long-term obligations to increase. For further information regarding the IRS settlement, please refer to Note 8 of the consolidated financial statements.

During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, the Company utilized cash to reduce its outstanding debt by approximately $50.0 million, causing a reduction in total assets and long-term obligations. For further information concerning the Company’s long-term obligations, please refer to Note 6 of the consolidated financial statements.

Item 7.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Cautionary Statement

Some of the statements in this document include statements about future expectations. Statements that are not historical facts are “forward-looking statements” for the purpose of the safe harbor provided by Section 21E of the Exchange Act and Section 27A of the Securities Act. These forward-looking statements, which include references to one or more potential transactions, and strategic alternatives under consideration or projections of performance for the upcoming fiscal year, are predictive in nature or depend upon or refer to future events or conditions. These statements are subject to known, as well as, unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from expectations. These risks include, but are not limited to those discussed in the risk factors section of this annual report whether or not such risks are repeated in connection with any forward looking statement. There can be no assurance that any anticipated performance or future transactions will occur or be structured in the manner suggested or that any such transaction will be completed. Alico undertakes no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of future events, new information or otherwise.

When used in this document, or in the documents incorporated by reference herein, the words anticipate, should, believe, estimate, may, intend, expect, and other words of similar meaning, are likely to address Alico’s growth strategy, financial results and/or product development programs. Actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those contemplated, expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements contained herein. The considerations listed herein represent certain important factors Alico believes could cause such results to differ. These considerations are not intended to represent a complete list of the general or specific risks that may affect Alico. It should be recognized that other risks, including general economic factors and expansion strategies, may be significant, presently or in the future, and the risks set forth herein may affect Alico to a greater extent than indicated.

The following discussion focuses on the results of operations and the financial condition of Alico. This section should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes.

On September 28, 2007, the Board of Directors of Alico approved a change in Alico’s fiscal year end from August 31 to September 30. The fiscal year change was effective beginning with Alico’s 2008 fiscal year. Alico’s 2008 fiscal year began on October 1, 2007 and ended September 30, 2008, resulting in a one month transition period that began September 1, 2007 and ended September 30, 2007. Accordingly, information is presented for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the one month transition period and for the prior fiscal year ended August 31, 2007.

Alico’s agricultural operations are seasonal in nature. While the season for each commodity differs, generally the season for each commodity is concluded by August 31 of each year and begins no earlier than October 1. For this reason, results for the fiscal year ended September 30 are generally comparable to those of the prior fiscal years ended August 31.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Dollar amounts listed in thousands:

		September 30,
		2009				2008				2007
Cash & liquid investments		$	22,204			$	78,637			$	78,110
Total current assets			51,335				123,130				135,376
Current liabilities			12,644				18,200				25,138
Working capital			38,691				104,930				110,238
Total assets			200,235				273,932				285,349
Notes payable		$	78,928			$	137,758			$	135,884
Current ratio			4.06				6.77				5.39

Management believes that Alico will be able to meet its working capital requirements for the foreseeable future with internally generated funds and available credit. Alico has credit commitments under a revolving line of credit that provides for revolving credit of up to $75.0 million. Of the $75.0 million credit commitment, $47.7 million was available for Alico’s general use at September 30, 2009 (see Note 6 to consolidated financial statements).

Cash flows from Operations

Cash flows from operations were $16.4 million, $13.8 million and ($52.9 million) for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007. Cash flow from operations was ($1.8 million) for the one month transition period ended September 30, 2007. Cash flow from operations for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007 were negatively impacted by payments of $10.5 million to the State of Florida and $66.2 million to the IRS, respectively, related to the settlement of an IRS audit, which will cause those years not to be indicative of expected future cash flows from operations (see note 8 to consolidated financial statements).

In November 2008, Alico’s subsidiary, Alico-Agri received a payment of $2.5 million in escrow in connection with the restructure of a real estate contract (“East”) with Ginn- LA Naples, Ltd, LLLP (“Ginn”). In April 2009, Ginn defaulted on the East parcel contract. Under the terms of the contract, a quarterly interest payment of $283 thousand was due on March 30, 2009, but the payment was not received. Alico-Agri has initiated foreclosure proceedings to reclaim the property.

A settlement agreement with a vendor resulted in a $7.0 million payment to Alico in March 2009. Under the terms of the agreement, the vendor admits no wrongdoing and stipulates that Alico cannot divulge the vendor’s name or the agreement’s circumstances. Alico recognized the payment as other income during the second quarter of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.

In December 2008, Alico offered an option to former and retired employees to terminate future benefits under a non-qualified deferred compensation plan in exchange for cash equal to the net present value of future vested benefits. Payments of $1.4 million were paid to participants who elected the option in January 2009. Life insurance policies were liquidated to fund the distributions.

Several noncash adjustments to net income caused significant differences in cash flows from operations compared with the net loss for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. The Company recorded impairments related to its breeding herd, two parcels of real estate and auction rate securities totaling approximately $5.4 million during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. These impairments caused a decrease in net income, but were non-cash items. Additionally during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, the Company adjusted its deferred tax rate and created an allowance account for its charitable contribution carry forward. These noncash tax items caused net income to decrease by $836 thousand.

Inventoried costs of $18.7 million at September 30, 2009 were significantly lower than the $27.5 million level at September 30, 2008, the result of decreases in the costs of major inputs such as fuel and fertilizer from their 2008 levels, as well as aggressive cost reduction measures undertaken by the Company during fiscal year 2009.

Cash flows from Investing

Cash outlays for land, equipment, buildings, and other improvements totaled $6.7 million, $6.1 million and $9.1 million during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007, respectively. Alico anticipates its capital needs, primarily for the care of young citrus trees, real estate entitlement work, sugarcane plantings, and raising cattle for breeding purposes, at between $4.5 million and $5.5 million for fiscal year 2010.

Alico’s balance sheet has carried large amounts of cash and investments over the past several years in order to comply with liquidity provisions mandated by the Bermuda Monetary Authority for Alico’s wholly owned insurance subsidiary, Agri. Alico is currently working to liquidate the subsidiary and utilized approximately $50.0 million of liquidated Agri cash and investment proceeds to reduce its Revolving Line of Credit (RLOC) in January 2009.

Recent market conditions have depressed Florida real estate markets causing the predictability of real estate sales including timing and market values to be problematic. Alico through its subsidiary ALDI continues to market parcels of its real estate holdings which are deemed by the Board of Directors and Management to be excess to the immediate needs of Alico’s core operations. The sale of any of these parcels could be material to the operations and cash flows of Alico.

Cash flows from Financing

Alico is working to dissolve its Agri subsidiary. Proceeds received from the liquidation of cash and investments held by Agri enabled Alico to pay $50.0 million on its revolving line of credit in January 2009.

On March 30, 2009, the Company modified its RLOC with Farm Credit of Southwest Florida. According to the terms of the modification, the total availability of funds under the RLOC was reduced to $75.0 million from $125.0 million. Additionally, several covenants were modified as follows: a) the covenant requiring the Company to maintain stockholder equity of at least $110 million was eliminated in its entirety b) the minimum current ratio was increased to 2.5 to 1 from 2.0 to 1 and c) the fixed charge coverage ratio was replaced by a debt coverage ratio requiring the Company to maintain a debt coverage of not less than 1.10 to 1 on a rolling four quarter basis. The maturity date of the RLOC was extended from August 1, 2011 to August 1, 2012. The interest rate index was changed from 3 month LIBOR to 1 month LIBOR, and the interest rate spread increased by 100 basis points. The Company also pledged an additional 10,147 acres of real estate in Hendry County, Florida. In addition to the covenants discussed above, the agreements set limitations on the extension of loans or additional borrowings by Alico or any subsidiary. The covenants also restrict Alico’s activities regarding investments, liens, borrowing and leasing.

In September 2008, Alico converted $50.0 million of the outstanding balance on its RLOC with Farm Credit of Southwest Florida to a 10 year term loan bearing a fixed interest rate of 6.79% with equal payments of principal and interest of $1.7 million per quarter until maturity. The term loan is cross collateralized with Alico’s RLOC and contains identical covenants. Alico is currently in compliance with all the covenants under its loan agreements and expects to continue to work with its lender to remain so for the foreseeable future.

Alico’s Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of up to 350,000 shares of Alico’s common stock through November 1, 2013, for the purpose of funding restricted stock grants under its 2008 Incentive Equity Plan in order to provide restricted stock to eligible Directors and Senior Managers to align their interests with those of Alico’s shareholders. Alico may purchase an additional 344,500 shares in accordance with the authorization. Previously Alico provided incentives under its 1998 Plan, and was authorized to purchase up to 650,000 shares prior to the plan’s expiration in November 2008. Pursuant to approved plans, Alico purchased 25,500 shares in the open market at an average price of $36.63 per share during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, 27,968 shares at an average price of $42.76 during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 and 27,770 shares at a weighted average price of $53.45 per share during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2007. No treasury purchases were made during the transition month ended September 30, 2007.

Alico paid quarterly dividends of $0.275 per share on November 14, 2008 and February 15, 2009 and quarterly dividends of $0.1375 per share on May 15, 2009, August 15, 2009 and November 13, 2009. At its meeting on October 30, 2009, the Board of Directors deferred dividend consideration. The Board will continue to assess financial condition, compliance with debt covenants, and earnings of Alico in determining its dividend policy.

Results from Operations

Summary of results (dollars in thousands):

														Fiscal
				Fiscal						One Month				Year
		Year Ended								Ended				Ended
		September 30,								September 30,				August 31,
		2009				2008				2007				2007
Operating revenue		$	89,528				116,382			$	758			$	132,005
Gross profit (loss)			1,838				14,057				(69	)			29,685
General & administrative expenses			9,096				11,478				815				12,727
Profit (loss) from continuing operations			(7,258	)			2,579				(884	)			16,958
Profit on sale of bulk real estate			1,646				817				—				1,257
Interest and investment income			594				7,745				683				7,337
Interest expense			5,430				6,565				820				5,652
Other income (expense)			6,961				262				(4	)			225
Income tax provision		$	162				(765	)		$	(176	)		$	33,520
Effective income tax rate			-4.6	%			-15.8	%			17.2	%			166.6	%
Net income (loss) from continuing operations		$	(3,649	)			5,603			$	(849	)		$	(13,395	)

Alico’s agricultural operations generally combine to produce the majority of operating revenue, gross profit and income from operations. As a producer of agricultural products, Alico’s ability to control the prices it receives from its products is limited, and prices for agricultural products can be volatile. Operating results are largely dictated by market conditions. A combination of factors, discussed more specifically in the paragraphs following, resulted in lower profits for the Company’s agricultural operations in fiscal year 2009 when compared with fiscal year 2008 and 2007. Furthermore, declining market conditions caused the Company to evaluate several of its assets at September 30, 2009. Impairments of $5.4 million were identified during the process and charged to operations.

The Company has conducted detailed analyses of its operations in an effort to become more efficient and become more profitable in the future. These analyses have resulted in the implementation of aggressive cost reduction measures, the scaling back of operations and the elimination of several lines of business. The Board of Directors has taken an active role to assist Management in identifying areas for further improvement and closely monitoring results. While the prices received for agricultural products is largely out of the Company’s control, the Company believes that margins will improve as further cost savings are realized.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses decreased by 21% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 compared with the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. This savings resulted in the lowest level of general and administrative expenses since the fiscal year ended August 31, 2004. Further reductions are expected for fiscal year 2010. Cost savings measures have included reductions in staffing, outside consultants and employee benefit programs, but have generally occurred over all categories of general and administrative expenses. The cost reduction initiative was implemented during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 and resulted in savings of 10% when compared with the fiscal year ended August 31, 2007.

Profit from the Sale of Real Estate

Alico’s real estate revenues during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007 have primarily resulted from three contracts with the Ginn Companies related to the sale of real estate in Lee County, Florida. The Company recognized a total of $3.0 million, $4.6 million, and $4.6 million of real estate revenue for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007, respectively, of which $1.6 million, $0.8 million and $1.3 million were classified as non-operating revenues for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007, respectively.

In October 2008, the three contracts were renegotiated, resulting in the Company retaking possession of one of the properties resulting in a reduction of revenue during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 compared with the two previous fiscal years. The purchaser failed to exercise its option on another contract. In April 2009, the buyer defaulted on the third contract. The Company has initiated foreclosure proceedings to reclaim the property.

Recent market conditions have depressed Florida real estate markets causing the predictability of real estate sales including timing and market values to be problematic. Alico continues to market parcels of its real estate holdings which are deemed by Management and the Board of Directors to be excess to the immediate needs of Alico’s core operations. The sale of any of these parcels could be material to the operations and cash flows of Alico.

Due to decreases in the market prices of Florida real estate, the Company evaluated several of its properties for impairment at September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007. In conducting its evaluation, the Company reviewed the estimated non-discounted cash flows from each of the properties and obtained independent third party appraisals from a qualified real estate appraiser. Based on this information, the Company determined that a 291 acre lakefront property in Polk County, Florida, purchased in October 2005 for $9.2 million, was impaired by approximately $1.9 million at August 31, 2007, an additional $1.5 million at September 30, 2008, and an additional $2.8 million at September 30, 2009 due to declines in the Florida real estate market. The impairment losses were included as a charge to real estate operating expenses during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007. Alico’s remaining adjusted book basis in the property was $3.0 million at September 30, 2009. Additionally the Company determined that a parcel of land in Hendry County, Florida with a cost basis of $3.6 million was impaired by $1.5 million at September 30, 2009. Alico’s remaining book basis in this parcel was $2.1 million at September 30, 2009.

Provision for Income taxes

The Company’s effective tax rate is impacted by IRS adjustments including penalties and interest, state income taxes, including penalties and interest, items which may be included in book income but are not taxable under current statutes, such as earnings from tax exempt bonds, items included in book expense that are not deductible under current statutes, such as lobbying expenses and non qualified retirement plans, and the expiration of otherwise allowable deductions that do not meet recognition thresholds such as expired net operating loss and contribution carry forwards.

During the fiscal year ended August 31, 2002, the Company pledged $5.0 million to Florida Gulf Coast University. The donation was paid $1.0 million during fiscal year 2002 and $800 thousand annually over the next five years. This donation is the primary source of contribution carry forwards.

Based on income forecasts for subsequent years, the Company lowered its expected tax rate for deferred items and established an allowance account for its charitable contribution carry forward at September 30, 2009. Additionally, the Company recognized income taxes for charitable contributions that expired during the year. The cumulative impact of these adjustments was to reduce the tax benefit for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 by $1.0 million and reduce the effective tax rate by 29.6%. For a more complete discussion of items impacting the effective tax rate, see Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements.

The Company annually evaluates positions taken on tax returns to determine if it is more likely than not that the positions taken on the returns would be upheld under audit. During its annual assessment at September 30, 2009, one position, related to the timing of deductions was identified as not meeting the more likely than not threshold. The Company has accrued $314 thousand, representing interest and penalties related to this timing difference. The accrual was included as a component of the Company’s tax provision for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.

The IRS audited the Company’s tax returns for the 2000 — 2004 tax years. The audit was primarily related to the Company’s Agri subsidiary headquartered in Bermuda. As a result of the audit, the Company reached a settlement with the IRS which resulted in the payment of additional income taxes of $66.2 million during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2007 and $10.5 million during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008.

Alico’s effective tax rate for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 was impacted by a benefit resulting from a final adjustment of the IRS settlement adjustment from previously accrued estimates of $1.6 million. The effect of this adjustment was to reduce the effective tax rate by 33% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008.

For the transition month ended September 30, 2007, the effective tax rate was 17.2% which differed from the expected combined Federal and State blended rate of 38% primarily due to the expiration of a charitable contribution carry forward.

Alico’s effective tax rate for the year ended August 31, 2007, was impacted by a $26.0 million adjustment related to the settlement of an IRS dispute. The effect of this adjustment was to increase the effective tax rate by 130% for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2007.

The IRS is currently auditing Alico’s amended tax returns for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 and the short period return filed for the transition month ended September 30, 2007. Alico has extended the statute of limitations on the originally filed 2005 and 2006 tax returns to December 31, 2010 pursuant to a request by IRS exams.

Interest and Investment Income

Interest and investment income is generated principally from mortgages held on real estate sold on the installment basis, investments in corporate and municipal bonds, mutual funds, and U.S. Treasury securities. Interest and investment income was lower for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 compared with the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007 due to reductions in earnings from mortgage interest and interest from investments.

Variations in interest income related to seller financed mortgages caused by interest rate fluctuations and a default on the mortgage was a primary factor in interest income fluctuations between the fiscal years presented. In April 2009, a purchaser defaulted on a $52 million mortgage held by Alico’s subsidiary Alico-Agri. The interest from the mortgage was recognized as interest income during fiscal years ended August 31, 2007, September 30, 2008 and in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 up until the time of the default. The Company recognized interest income of $0.8 million, $4.3 million and $3.1 million during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007 related to the mortgage. Additional interest received pursuant to the mortgage in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 compared with August 31, 2007 was the primary cause of increased interest income for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008.

For several years, including the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007, Alico’s balance sheet carried large amounts of cash and investments in order to comply with liquidity provisions mandated by the Bermuda Monetary Authority for Alico’s wholly owned insurance subsidiary, Agri. Alico is currently working to dissolve Agri. As a result of this effort, Agri converted a large majority of its investments to cash, and made pre-liquidation distributions to Alico in December of 2008. The result of this transaction was to lower the investment principal of the Company, causing a reduction in interest income from investments during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 when compared to the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007. The Company’s interest bearing investments totaled $9.8 million, $28.3 million and $46.2 million at September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007, respectively. Reduced investment principal combined with declining interest rates over the past three fiscal years caused investment income to decline.

The Company held auction rate securities with a cost basis of $5.5 million at September 30, 2009. There is no longer a current active market for these securities. The securities continue to be highly rated and continue to pay interest. The Company’s experience with these securities over the past two years has included several issues being called at face value. However, because there is no active market for the securities the Company has retained a valuation consultant to value the securities based on call dates and provisions, bond ratings, prevailing interest rates and broker expectations. Based on these valuations, Alico recorded impairments related to auction rate securities of $816 thousand during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 and an impairment of $120 thousand for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. At September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, auction rate securities with estimated fair values of $4.5 million and $4.1 million, respectively, were classified as non-current assets.

Interest Expense

Interest expense declined during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 compared with the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, primarily due to decreased debt levels. Alico’s outstanding debt was $78.9 million, $137.8 million and $136.9 million at September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007, respectively. In January 2009, Alico utilized the proceeds from its Agri subsidiary’s pre-liquidation distributions to pay down Alico’s RLOC. Interest expense was higher during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 than in the previous fiscal year due to a higher average debt levels during the year.

Operating Revenue

		Fiscal Year Ended								One Month Ended				Fiscal Year Ended
		September 30,								September 30,				August 31,
		2009				2008				2007				2007
Revenues
Agriculture:
Bowen		$	27,998				45,499			$	143			$	52,716
Citrus groves			36,030				41,167				5				47,484
Sugarcane			7,624				9,671				—				9,432
Cattle			8,201				6,793				330				9,977
Vegetables			4,706				5,460				—				3,803
Sod			535				1,118				92				2,180
Native trees and shrubs			47				125				—				249
Agriculture operations revenue			85,141				109,833				570				125,841
Real estate activities			1,372				3,870				—				3,329
Land leasing and rentals			2,691				2,276				141				1,495
Mining royalties			324				403				47				1,340
Total operating revenue		$	89,528				116,382			$	758			$	132,005

Operating revenues declined by 23% during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 when compared with the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. The decline was primarily due to lower citrus prices realized by Alico’s Bowen and citrus grove operations.

Operating revenues declined by 12% to $116.4 million in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 compared with $132.0 million in the fiscal year ended August 31, 2007. The decrease was primarily due to lower citrus prices realized by Bowen and Alico’s citrus grove operations during fiscal year 2008 compared with the prior fiscal year.

Gross Profit

		Fiscal Year Ended								One Month Ended				Fiscal Year Ended
		September 30,								September 30,				August 31,
		2009				2008				2007				2007
Gross profit (loss):
Agriculture:
Bowen		$	1,338			$	1,470			$	(79	)		$	930
Citrus groves			8,731				13,530				2				24,057
Sugarcane			(2,185	)			421				—				599
Cattle			(1,960	)			(2,127	)			41				255
Vegetables			(1,941	)			(141	)			—				496
Sod			(67	)			(1,535	)			(116	)			862
Native trees and shrubs			28				125				—				249
Gross profit (loss) from agricultural operations			3,944				11,743				(152	)			27,448
Real estate activities			(3,893	)			341				(59	)			(79	)
Land leasing and rentals			1,574				1,668				105				1,102
Mining royalties			213				305				37				1,214
Gross Profit (loss)			1,838				14,057				(69	)			29,685

Alico measures gross profit from its operations before any allocation of corporate overhead or interest charges. Gross profit is dependent upon the prices received for each of the Company’s products, less harvesting, marketing and delivery costs and the direct costs of producing the products. Because Alico’s agricultural products are commodities, Alico is not able to predict with certainty what price it will receive for its products; however, its costs are relatively fixed.

Gross profits were lower for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 when compared with the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 due primarily to declines in gross profits from agricultural and real estate activities. Gross profits were lower for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 compared with the fiscal year ended August 31, 2007 primarily due to lower gross profits from agricultural activities.

Reduced gross profits from citrus fruit, sugarcane production and vegetable crops (discussed in more detail in the paragraphs following) combined to reduce the overall gross profit from agricultural operations for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 when compared with the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. Citrus groves, cattle and sod gross profits were lower during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 when compared with the fiscal year ended August 31, 2007.

Agricultural Operations

Due to a variety of factors, several of Alico’s agricultural operations generated losses during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008. Because agricultural results depend on a variety of factors largely beyond the Company’s control, predicting future revenues or gross profits from agricultural operations is highly speculative.

Bowen

Bowen’s operations primarily consist of providing harvesting, hauling and marketing services to Alico, as well as other citrus growers and processors in the State of Florida. Additionally, Bowen purchases and resells citrus fruit at a modest margin. Bowen’s operations generated revenues of $28.0 million, $45.5 million, and $52.7 million for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008, and August 31, 2007, respectively. Gross profits were $1.3 million, $1.5 million and $0.9 million respectively, for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007. Citrus prices declined during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 compared with price levels during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 due to consumer price resistance and large amounts of citrus juice inventories throughout the industry. Nevertheless, because Bowen is primarily a service provider, Bowen was able to maintain its gross profit level compared with the prior year despite the decline in gross revenue. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, Bowen was able to increase the margin for the services it provides and increase gross profits in spite of a decline in revenue caused by lower citrus prices.

Citrus Groves

Alico’s Citrus Groves division primarily produces citrus for delivery to citrus processors. The division recorded gross revenues of $36.0 million, $41.2 million, and $47.5 million and gross profits of $8.7 million, $13.5 million, and $24.1 million, for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007, respectively. Citrus prices realized by the Citrus Groves division declined 5% during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 when compared with the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, which caused a corresponding decline in revenue and gross profit for the Citrus Groves division. Additionally, production from the citrus groves division declined by 7% during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 when compared with the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. Citrus prices declined by 27% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 when compared with the fiscal year ended August 31, 2007. This price decline caused a corresponding decrease in both revenue and gross profit compared with the prior year.

Alico harvested 3.9 million, 4.2 million, and 3.5 million 90-pound equivalent boxes of citrus in the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007, respectively. Alico estimates that its fiscal year 2010 crop will produce approximately 3.7 million boxes. Alico’s citrus production trend tends to mirror the trend for the State of Florida. The Florida Department of Agriculture estimates the 2009-10 Florida Orange crop at 136.0 million boxes, a 16% decrease from the 2008-09 crop of 162.4 million boxes. Market reactions to the estimate have been toward slightly higher prices for 2009-10 crops than those experienced in 2008-09.

Alico has contracts with several citrus processors with pricing mechanisms based on a minimum price along with a price increase if market conditions exceed the minimum. If current market conditions and outlooks hold steady, Alico expects to receive slightly better than the minimum contracted price for its citrus for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010 which, along with the projected decline in production, is expected to cause gross citrus revenue and gross profit to remain relatively stable compared with the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.

Sugarcane

Alico’s sugarcane operations consist of cultivating sugarcane for sale to a sugar processor. Sugarcane revenues were $7.6 million, $9.7 million, and $9.4 million during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008 and August 31 2007, respectively. Sugarcane generated gross (losses) profits of ($2.2 million), $0.4 million, and $0.6 million during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007, respectively. During fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007, approximately 250,000, 381,000, and 381,000 standard tons of sugarcane were harvested, respectively.

To maintain maximum production, sugarcane crops (grown on sandy soil such as Alico’s) must be rotated every three years. Sugarcane plantings tend to produce less tonnage per acre with each successive crop. Due to dwindling profit margins, uncertainty surrounding the facility where the Company delivers its product, and an unfavorable price determinant, Alico chose to reduce its sugarcane planting activities during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007. This decision caused the Company to harvest less sugarcane during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009. Since that time, the market outlook for sugar has improved, key input costs such as fuel and fertilizer have declined, more details concerning the future of the facility have become known and the Company was able to successfully negotiate a more favorable pricing arrangement with its sole customer.

The Company has undertaken a program to replant its sugarcane fields in order to achieve prior production levels. However, due to the growing cycle of sugarcane crops, the results from these efforts will not be realized until fiscal year 2011. Accordingly, the Company’s expected sugarcane tonnage for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010 is expected to be approximately 100,000 tons. Because of expected low yields from the older plantings, the Company has written down its sugarcane inventory related to the crop to be harvested during the year ending September 30, 2010 by $1.3 million, which was included as sugarcane operating expenses at September 30, 2009. During the last week of January and first week of February 2009, a cold front swept through Florida causing temperatures to drop into the mid 20’s resulting in damage to Alico’s sugarcane crop of approximately $1.1 million.

Cattle

Alico’s cattle operation is primarily engaged in the production of beef cattle, feeding cattle at western feedlots and the raising of replacement heifers. Cattle revenues were $8.2 million, $6.8 million, and $10.0 million and gross (losses) profits from cattle operations were ($2.0 million), ($2.1 million) and $0.3 million for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007, respectively.

The total pounds of beef sold was 9.3 million, 7.9 million and 11.1 million during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007, respectively. The average price received per pound sold was $0.89, $0.86 and $0.90, for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007, respectively.

The cattle industry has typically operated on a ten year cycle as cow-calf producers expand inventories in response to profits and reduce herd sizes in response to losses. Alico’s strategy was based on reducing herd sizes during the expansion phase of the cycle and building herd size through opportunistic acquisitions during the contraction phase. Several atypical factors have combined to alter the U.S. cattle cycle in the past few years including the utilization of former pastures for corn production due to increased ethanol demand, and drought conditions in the Southeastern United States. Due to these changes, Alico is reevaluating its cattle strategy to determine the most profitable course of action in the current environment.

The core business of Alico’s cattle operation is the sale of calves through western feedlots to meat packing facilities, or if advantageous, to third parties directly from the ranch. Due to a severe drought during fiscal year 2007, the stress effect of prior hurricanes on the cattle herd, and the aforementioned herd reduction, calf births have declined over the past several years, totaling 7,402 during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, 7,763 during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008, and 8,488 during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2007. The reduced number of births has resulted in an increased unit cost per calf. Additionally, rising corn prices caused by increased demand for ethanol production have caused feeding costs to increase. These factors have combined causing overall profit margins to decline over the past two fiscal years.

In an effort to minimize risk related to its feeding efforts, during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009 the Company purchased corn used for cattle feed. Subsequent declines in the price of corn after the purchase caused the Company to realize a loss of $444 thousand. Additionally, during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, the Company, through independent experts and willing third party buyers, valued its breeding herd and determined that it was impaired. The impairment adjustment of $813 thousand was included as a component of the cattle operating expenses for the year ended September 30, 2009.

The Company has undertaken assertive actions to reduce its cost of raising cattle. These actions have included increased fertility testing of the herd, aggressively culling unproductive animals, looking at alternative nutritional programs, staff reductions, changing pasture maintenance practices and utilizing outside expertise. The full results of these efforts will not be realized for several years due to the gestation period of cattle among other factors. In the meantime, the Company will continue to explore alternatives in an attempt to maximize the return on the acreage utilized for cattle operations. The Company expects the cattle division to recognize a loss from operations during the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010; however, not to as great of an extent as in the two prior fiscal years.

Vegetables

The Company farms snap beans and sweet corn on a portion of its property. Revenues from the sale of vegetables were $4.7 million, $5.5 million and $3.8 million for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007, respectively. Gross profits (losses) from the vegetable division were ($1.9 million), ($0.1 million) and $0.5 million over the same periods.

The Company produced 396,487, 506,069 and 342,705 combined units from its vegetable operations in fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007, respectively. During the last week of January and first week of February 2009, a cold front swept through Florida causing temperatures to drop into the mid 20’s resulting in damage to Alico’s vegetable crops. Additionally, increased production costs together with a decline in prices caused the Company to realize losses from its vegetable division during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.

Effective June 30, 2008, the Company discontinued its participation in Alico-J&J, LLC a joint venture vegetable farm. The parties to the joint venture each held a 50% interest in the earnings, assets and liabilities of the farm. The Company is currently working to dissolve the joint venture and distribute the remaining assets equitably among the members. Losses attributable to the joint venture of $0.7 million are included with the results of the vegetable division for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008. The Company has accounted for the joint venture under the equity method.

Non Agricultural Operations

Land leasing and rentals

Alico rents land to others on a tenant-at-will basis, for grazing, farming, oil exploration and recreational uses. Revenues from land rentals were $2.7 million, $2.3 million and $1.5 million during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007, respectively, generating gross profits of $1.6 million, $1.7 million, and $1.1 million. Alico plans to increase its leasing activities as opportunity allows.

Discontinued Operations

Effective June 30, 2008, the Company ceased operating its Alico Plant World facility. Plant World generated revenues of $2.6 million and $2.8 million during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007, respectively. Plant World’s operations generated losses of $1.6 million and $0.5 million in the fiscal years ended September 30, 2008, August 31, 2007, respectively. Plant World generated losses net of taxes of $0.9 million or $0.12 per share for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 and $0.2 million or $0.03 per share for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2007. The Company is currently leasing the Plant World facilities to a commercial greenhouse operator and has also sold a portion of the equipment used to operate the greenhouse. The results of Plant World’s operations and equipment sales have been reported as discontinued operations.

The Company began dissolution of its Agri subsidiary during the third quarter of fiscal year 2008. The effect of the dissolutions will be to transfer the assets of Agri to Alico and its subsidiaries. The expected costs of dissolution are not estimated to be material to the Company.

Changes in Officers

John R. Alexander, the Company’s Chairman, retired as Chief Executive Officer on June 30, 2008. The Board of Directors appointed Dan L. Gunter as Chief Executive Officer on July 1, 2008. Mr. Gunter had previously served as the Company’s President and Chief Operating Officer since April 2006. Mr. Alexander is continuing in his role as Chairman of the Board of Directors. As per the terms of a restricted stock grant in October 2006, 12,000 previously unvested shares vested upon Mr. Alexander’s retirement. The Company recognized compensation expense of $453 thousand for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 in association with the vesting. Additionally, the Company entered into a Transition, Severance, Consulting and Non-Compete agreement with Mr. Alexander effective July 1, 2008, the terms of which are more fully described in the Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 30, 2008.

Dan L. Gunter resigned as Chief Executive Officer effective November 17, 2008. Mr. Gunter had been granted 20,000 shares of restricted stock in April 2006 which were to vest 20% in April 2010, and 20% per year afterwards, until fully vested. The Company had been recognizing compensation expense related to the grants. Upon Mr. Gunter’s departure, the grants were forfeited, causing the Company to recover $424 thousand of previous compensation related to the grants. Mr. Gunter also executed a Transition, Severance, Consulting and Non-Compete agreement with Alico effective November 21, 2008, the terms of which are more fully described in the Company’s Form 8-K filed on November 21, 2008.

The Board of Directors appointed Steven M. Smith as the President and Principal Executive Officer on November 17, 2008. Mr. Smith had formerly served as Alico’s Senior Vice-President of Agriculture Operations since November 2006, and as the Company’s Citrus Division Vice President from 1996 to 2006. Details concerning Mr. Smith’s compensation arrangements are described in the Company’s Form 8-K filed on November 21, 2008.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

Alico through its wholly owned subsidiary Bowen, enters into purchase contracts for the purchase of citrus fruit during the normal course of its business. The obligations under these purchase agreements totaled $12.6 million at September 30, 2009. All of these purchases were covered by sales agreements at prices exceeding cost. In addition, Bowen had sales contracts totaling $1.2 million at September 30, 2009, for which a purchaser had not been contracted. Bowen management currently believes that all committed sales quantities can be purchased below the committed sales price. All of these contracts will be fulfilled by the end of the fiscal year 2010.

During the second quarter of fiscal year 2007, the Company formed a new company, Alico-J&J Farms, LLC and entered into a joint venture with J&J Produce to produce vegetables on land owned by Alico, Inc. Under the terms of the joint venture, Alico served as a guarantor for 50% of five-year equipment leases to the joint venture. The Company’s maximum total remaining unpaid obligations under these leases was $0.2 million at September 30, 2009. Effective June 30, 2008, the Company discontinued its participation in Alico-J&J, LLC.

Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

The contractual obligations of Alico at September 30, 2009 are set forth in the table below:

		Payments due by Period
						Less than				1 - 3				3 - 5				5 +
Contractual obligations		Total				1 year				years				years				years
Long-term debt		$	78,928			$	5,122			$	38,394			$	11,612			$	23,800
Expected interest on debt			18,968				4,041				6,879				4,008				4,040
Commissions			2,616				100				600				1,916				—
Citrus purchase contracts			12,596				12,596				—				—				—
Retirement benefits			3,523				294				561				600				2,068
Fixed asset additions			198				198				—				—				—
Consulting contracts			1,094				750				344				—				—
Leases — operating			754				263				443				48				—
Total		$	118,677			$	23,364			$	47,221			$	18,184			$	29,908

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of Alico’s financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, management evaluates the estimates and assumptions based upon historical experience and various other factors and circumstances. Management believes that the estimates and assumptions are reasonable in the circumstances; however, actual results may vary from these estimates and assumptions under different future circumstances. The following critical accounting policies have been identified that affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements.

Net Realizable Value — Alico records inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Management regularly assesses estimated inventory valuations based on current and forecasted usage of the related commodity, observable prices, estimated completion costs and other relevant factors that may affect the net realizable value.

Revenue Recognition — Revenue from agricultural crops is recognized at the time the crop is harvested. Based on fruit buyers’ and processors’ advances to growers, cash and futures markets combined with experience in the industry, management reviews the reasonableness of revenue accruals quarterly. Adjustments are made throughout the year to these estimates as more current relevant information regarding the specific commodity markets become available.

For sales made through Bowen, Alico evaluates the terms of each major customer contract relative to a number of criteria that management considers in making its determination with respect to gross versus net reporting of revenue for transactions with its customers. Management’s criteria for making these judgments place particular emphasis on determining the primary obligor in a transaction and which party bears general inventory risk. Bowen purchases and resells citrus fruit; in these transactions, Bowen (i) acts as principal; (ii) takes title to the products; and (iii) has the risks and rewards of ownership, including the risk of loss for collection, delivery or returns. For these transactions, Bowen recognizes revenues based on the gross amounts due from customers.

In recognizing revenue from land sales, Alico applies specific sales recognition criteria to determine when land sales revenue can be recorded. For example, a land sale must be consummated with a sufficient down payment of at least 20% to 25% of the sales price depending upon the type and timeframe for development of the property sold, and that any receivable from the sale cannot be subject to future subordination. In addition, the seller cannot retain any material continuing involvement in the property sold.

Capitalized Costs — Alico capitalizes the cost of growing crops into inventory until the time of harvest. Once a given crop is harvested, the related inventoried costs are recognized as a cost of sale to provide an appropriate matching of costs incurred with the related revenue earned.

Impairment of Investments — Alico values its investments based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for investments identical to those to be reported at fair value. An active market is a market in which transactions occur for the item to be fair valued with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

When quoted prices for the specific investments are not available, Alico uses inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly. These inputs include: (a) quoted prices for similar investments in active markets; (b) quoted prices for identical or similar investments in markets that are not active, such as when there are few transactions for the asset or liability, the prices are not current, price quotations vary substantially over time or are among market makers (for example, some brokered markets), or in which little information is released publicly (for example, a principal-to-principal market); (c) inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the investment (for example, interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals, volatilities, prepayments speeds, loss severities, credit risks, and default rates); and (d) inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Unobservable inputs for an investment are used to determine fair value only when observable inputs are not available. Unobservable inputs are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances, which include Alico’s own data and assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the security.

Unrealized gains and losses determined to be temporary are recorded as other comprehensive income, net of related deferred taxes, until realized. Unrealized losses determined to be other than temporary are recognized in the statement of operations during the period the determination is made.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets — Alico evaluates property, improvements, buildings, equipment and other long lived assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of assets contained in Alico’s financial statements may not be recoverable. The impairment calculation compares the carrying value of the asset to the asset’s estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges). Alico recognizes an impairment loss if the amount of the asset’s carrying value exceeds the asset’s estimated fair value. If an impairment loss is recognized, the adjusted carrying amount of the asset becomes its cost basis. For a depreciable long-lived asset, the new cost basis will be depreciated (amortized) over the remaining useful life of that asset. Restoration of a previously recognized impairment loss is prohibited.

Income Taxes — Deferred income taxes are recognized for the income tax effect of temporary differences between financial statement carrying amounts and the income tax bases of assets and liabilities. Alico regularly reviews its deferred income tax assets to determine whether future taxable income will be sufficient to realize the benefits of these assets. A valuation allowance is provided for deferred income tax assets for which it is deemed, more likely than not, that future taxable income will not be sufficient to realize the related income tax benefits from these assets. The amount of the net deferred income tax asset that is considered realizable could, however, be adjusted if estimates of future taxable income are adjusted.

Item 7A.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

Alico’s exposure to market rate risk and changes in interest rates relate primarily to its investment portfolio, mortgage notes receivable and Revolving Line of Credit. Investments are placed with high quality issuers and, by policy, limit the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer. Alico is adverse to principal loss and provides for the safety and preservation of invested funds by limiting default, market and reinvestment risk. Alico classifies cash equivalents and short-term investments as fixed-rate if the rate of return on such instruments remains fixed over their term. These fixed-rate investments include fixed-rate U.S. government securities, municipal bonds, time deposits and certificates of deposit. Cash equivalents and short-term investments are classified as variable-rate if the rate of return on such investments varies based on the change in a predetermined index or set of indices during their term. These variable-rate investments primarily include money market accounts, mutual funds and equities held at various securities brokers and investment banks. No changes in risk management have occurred during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.

The table below presents the costs and estimated fair value of the investment portfolio at September 30, 2009:

						Estimated
		Cost				Fair Value
Marketable Securities and Short-term Investments (1)
Fixed Rate		$	4,123			$	4,125
Variable Rate		$	3,883			$	3,883

The aggregate fair value of investments in debt instruments (net of mutual funds of $1,108) as of September 30, 2009, by contractual maturity date, consisted of the following:

		Aggregate
		Fair
		Values
Due in one year or less		$	3,410
Due between one and five years			—
Due between five and ten years			—
Due thereafter			3,490
Total		$	6,900

Fixed rate investments tend to decline with market rate interest increases. Variable rate investments are generally affected more by general market expectations and conditions. A 1% change in interest rates on Alico’s portfolio would impact Alico’s annual interest revenue by approximately $38 thousand. Additionally, Alico has debt with interest rates that vary with LIBOR. A 1% increase in this rate would impact Alico’s annual interest expense by approximately $273 thousand based on Alico’s outstanding debt under these agreements at September 30, 2009.

Item 8.		Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Alico, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Alico, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the years ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007, and for the one month period ended September 30, 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Alico, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 and August 31, 2007, and for the one month period ended September 30, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Alico, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated December 14, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of Alico, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP   Orlando, Florida
December 14, 2009

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Alico, Inc.

We have audited Alico, Inc. and Subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Alico, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (a) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (b) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (c) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Alico, Inc. and Subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Alico, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the years ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 and August 31, 2007, and for the one month period ended September 30, 2007 and our report dated December 14, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion.

/s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP   Orlando, Florida
December 14, 2009

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)

		September 30,
		2009				2008
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	18,794			$	54,370
Investments			3,410				24,267
Accounts receivable, net			1,929				5,394
Income tax receivable			5,994				6,388
Mortgages and notes receivable			72				2,830
Inventories			18,737				27,451
Deferred tax asset			1,431				1,507
Other current assets			968				923
Total current assets			51,335				123,130
Other assets:
Mortgages and notes receivable, net of current portion			7,221				4,774
Investments, deposits and other assets			8,984				6,975
Deferred tax asset			7,356				6,056
Cash surrender value of life insurance, designated			6,291				7,585
Total other assets			29,852				25,390
Property, buildings and equipment			178,736				181,429
Less accumulated depreciation			(59,688	)			(56,017	)
Net property, buildings and equipment			119,048				125,412
Total assets		$	200,235			$	273,932

(Continued)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)

		September 30,
		2009				2008
LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable		$	1,283			$	1,847
Income taxes payable			—				281
Current portion of notes payable			5,122				5,470
Accrued expenses			2,252				3,372
Dividends payable			1,014				2,027
Accrued ad valorem taxes			1,967				2,270
Other current liabilities			1,006				2,933
Total current liabilities			12,644				18,200
Notes payable, net of current portion			73,806				132,288
Deferred retirement benefits, net of current portion			3,229				4,151
Other liabilities			3,680				3,800
Total liabilities			93,359				158,439
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, no par value. Authorized 1,000 shares; issued, none			—				—
Common stock, $1 par value. Authorized 15,000 shares; issued 7,377 and outstanding 7,375 shares in 2009; issued 7,376 and outstanding 7,374 in 2008			7,377				7,376
Additional paid in capital			9,480				9,474
Treasury stock, at cost			(52	)			(64	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)			3				(92	)
Retained earnings			90,068				98,799
Total stockholders’ equity			106,876				115,493
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	200,235			$	273,932

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands except per share data)

										One Month				Fiscal Year
		Fiscal Year Ended								Ended				Ended
		September 30,								September 30,				August 31,
		2009				2008				2007				2007
Operating revenue
Agricultural operations		$	85,141			$	109,833			$	570			$	125,841
Non-agricultural operations			3,015				2,679				188				2,835
Real estate operations			1,372				3,870				—				3,329
Total operating revenue			89,528				116,382				758				132,005
Operating expenses
Agricultural operations			81,197				98,090				722				98,393
Non-agricultural operations			1,228				706				46				519
Real estate operations			5,265				3,529				59				3,408
Total operating expenses			87,690				102,325				827				102,320
Gross profit (loss)			1,838				14,057				(69	)			29,685
Corporate general and administrative			9,096				11,478				815				12,727
Profit (loss) from continuing operations			(7,258	)			2,579				(884	)			16,958
Other income (expense):
Profit on sales of bulk real estate:
Sales			1,646				817				—				1,434
Cost of sales			—				—				—				(177	)
Profit on sales of bulk real estate, net			1,646				817				—				1,257
Interest & investment income			594				7,745				683				7,337
Interest expense			(5,430	)			(6,565	)			(820	)			(5,652	)
Other			6,961				262				(4	)			225
Total other income (expense), net			3,771				2,259				(141	)			3,167
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes			(3,487	)			4,838				(1,025	)			20,125
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes			162				(765	)			(176	)			33,520
Income (loss) from continuing operations			(3,649	)			5,603				(849	)			(13,395	)
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of taxes			—				(890	)			169				(295	)
Net (loss) income		$	(3,649	)		$	4,713			$	(680	)		$	(13,690	)