ALIMERA SCIENCES INC - Quarter Report: 2014 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2014
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-34703
Alimera Sciences, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 20-0028718 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
6120 Windward Parkway, Suite 290 Alpharetta, GA | 30005 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(678) 990-5740
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer | o | Accelerated filer | o | |
Non-accelerated filer | o | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | x |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
As of May 7, 2014 there were 40,325,670 shares of the registrant's Common Stock issued and outstanding.
ALIMERA SCIENCES, INC.
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
INDEX
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 | |
Exhibit 31.1 | |
Exhibit 31.2 | |
Exhibit 32.1 |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
ALIMERA SCIENCES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
March 31, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | ||||||
(In thousands, except share and per share data) | |||||||
CURRENT ASSETS: | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 41,326 | $ | 12,628 | |||
Accounts receivable, net | 1,278 | 500 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 2,413 | 3,474 | |||||
Inventory, net (Note 5) | 1,234 | 1,786 | |||||
Deferred financing costs | 208 | 250 | |||||
Total current assets | 46,459 | 18,638 | |||||
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT — at cost less accumulated depreciation | 959 | 982 | |||||
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 47,418 | $ | 19,620 | |||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: | |||||||
Accounts payable | $ | 1,844 | $ | 1,735 | |||
Accrued expenses (Note 6) | 758 | 934 | |||||
Outsourced services payable | 183 | 603 | |||||
Note payable (Note 8) | 1,667 | 1,667 | |||||
Capital lease obligations | 10 | 10 | |||||
Total current liabilities | 4,462 | 4,949 | |||||
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES: | |||||||
Derivative warrant liability | 29,511 | 16,381 | |||||
Note payable — less current portion (Note 8) | 2,778 | 3,194 | |||||
Other non-current liabilities | 16 | 21 | |||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | |||||||
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT): | |||||||
Preferred stock, $.01 par value — 10,000,000 shares authorized at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013: | |||||||
Series A convertible preferred stock, 1,300,000 authorized and 1,000,000 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013; liquidation preference of $40,000 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 | 32,045 | 32,045 | |||||
Common stock, $.01 par value — 100,000,000 shares authorized, 38,036,544 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2014 and 31,610,991 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 | 380 | 316 | |||||
Additional paid-in capital | 276,595 | 240,135 | |||||
Common stock warrants | 219 | 412 | |||||
Accumulated deficit | (298,104 | ) | (277,345 | ) | |||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (484 | ) | (488 | ) | |||
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) | 10,651 | (4,925 | ) | ||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) | $ | 47,418 | $ | 19,620 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
ALIMERA SCIENCES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2014 AND 2013
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||
2014 | 2013 | ||||||
(In thousands, except share and per share data) | |||||||
NET REVENUE | $ | 2,084 | $ | — | |||
COST OF GOODS SOLD | (564 | ) | — | ||||
GROSS MARGIN | 1,520 | — | |||||
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES | 2,626 | 2,023 | |||||
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES | 2,927 | 2,670 | |||||
SALES AND MARKETING EXPENSES | 3,411 | 3,563 | |||||
OPERATING EXPENSES | 8,964 | 8,256 | |||||
INTEREST EXPENSE, NET AND OTHER | (129 | ) | (134 | ) | |||
UNREALIZED FOREIGN CURRENCY LOSS, NET | (56 | ) | — | ||||
CHANGE IN FAIR VALUE OF DERIVATIVE WARRANT LIABILITY | (13,130 | ) | (5,594 | ) | |||
NET LOSS | $ | (20,759 | ) | $ | (13,984 | ) | |
NET LOSS PER SHARE APPLICABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS — Basic and diluted | $ | (0.58 | ) | $ | (0.44 | ) | |
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING — Basic and diluted | 35,853,869 | 31,545,569 |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
ALIMERA SCIENCES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2014 AND 2013
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||
2014 | 2013 | ||||||
NET LOSS | $ | (20,759 | ) | $ | (13,984 | ) | |
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS | |||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments | 4 | 8 | |||||
TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS | 4 | 8 | |||||
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS | $ | (20,755 | ) | $ | (13,976 | ) |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
ALIMERA SCIENCES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2014 AND 2013
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||
2014 | 2013 | ||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||
Net loss | $ | (20,759 | ) | $ | (13,984 | ) | |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 36 | 27 | |||||
Unrealized foreign currency transaction loss | 56 | — | |||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount | 42 | 40 | |||||
Stock-based compensation expense | 933 | 532 | |||||
Change in fair value of derivative warrant liability | 13,130 | 5,594 | |||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | |||||||
Accounts receivable | (775 | ) | — | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 1,054 | (611 | ) | ||||
Inventory | 548 | (339 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable | 111 | 367 | |||||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | (592 | ) | (1,427 | ) | |||
Other long-term liabilities | (2 | ) | 26 | ||||
Net cash used in operating activities | (6,218 | ) | (9,775 | ) | |||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||
Purchases of property and equipment | (12 | ) | (28 | ) | |||
Net cash used in investing activities | (12 | ) | (28 | ) | |||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | |||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 287 | 33 | |||||
Proceeds from sale of common stock | 37,500 | — | |||||
Payment of issuance cost of common stock | (2,389 | ) | — | ||||
Payment of principal on notes payable | (417 | ) | (492 | ) | |||
Payments on capital lease obligations | (2 | ) | (3 | ) | |||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 34,979 | (462 | ) | ||||
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | (51 | ) | 8 | ||||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | 28,698 | (10,257 | ) | ||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS — Beginning of year | 12,628 | 49,564 | |||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS — End of year | $ | 41,326 | $ | 39,307 | |||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES: | |||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 89 | $ | 71 |
There were no income tax or dividend payments made for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
1. | NATURE OF OPERATIONS |
Alimera Sciences, Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the Company), is a biopharmaceutical company that specializes in the research, development and commercialization of prescription ophthalmic pharmaceuticals. The Company was formed on June 4, 2003 under the laws of the State of Delaware.
The Company is presently focused on diseases affecting the back of the eye, or retina, because the Company’s management believes these diseases are not well treated with current therapies and represent a significant market opportunity. The Company’s only commercial product is ILUVIEN®, which has received marketing authorization in the United Kingdom, Austria, Portugal, France, Germany and Spain, and has been recommended for marketing authorization in Italy, for the treatment of vision impairment associated with chronic diabetic macular edema (DME) considered insufficiently responsive to available therapies. DME is a disease of the retina that affects individuals with diabetes and can lead to severe vision loss and blindness. ILUVIEN is the first product approved for chronic DME in the United Kingdom and European Union (EU). As part of the approval process in these countries, the Company has committed to conduct a five-year, post-authorization, open label registry study of ILUVIEN in 800 patients treated per the labeled indication. ILUVIEN has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
The Company launched ILUVIEN in the United Kingdom and Germany in April and May of 2013, respectively, and currently plans to launch ILUVIEN in France in late 2014. The Company was able to launch in Germany without price restrictions, but continues to work with the statutory health insurance funds in Germany to streamline reimbursement for ILUVIEN.
In January 2013, the United Kingdom’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) published final guidance for England and Wales indicating that ILUVIEN does not satisfy NICE's definition of cost effectiveness for the treatment of vision impairment associated with chronic DME considered insufficiently responsive to available therapies given the cost of £5,500. The Company submitted a simple patient access scheme (PAS) for ILUVIEN to NICE for consideration under its rapid review facility. In October 2013, the NICE Appraisal Committee issued a positive Final Appraisal Determination recommending ILUVIEN funding for the treatment of pseudophakic eyes (eyes with an artificial lens) in chronic DME patients considered insufficiently responsive to available therapies and the final technology appraisal guidance was published in November 2013. The technology appraisal guidance reverses the published guidance issued by NICE in January 2013, and takes into consideration the PAS. NICE requires clinical commissioning groups, National Health Service (NHS) England and Wales, and local public health authorities to comply with the recommendations in the final guidance within three months of its date of publication. The Company began receiving orders for ILUVIEN from several NHS facilities in January 2014, indicating early implementation of the NICE guidance in certain NHS facilities. Further, in February 2014, the Scottish Medicines Consortium, after completing its assessment and review of a similar simple PAS, announced that is has accepted ILUVIEN for restricted use within the NHS Scotland.
In July 2013, the Transparency Commission (Commission de la Transparence or CT) of the French National Health Authority (Haute Autorite de Sante) issued a favorable opinion for the reimbursement and hospital listing of ILUVIEN by the French National Health Insurance for the treatment of chronic DME considered insufficiently responsive to available therapies. In the opinion, ILUVIEN was deemed as providing a "moderate medical benefit" as defined by the Service Medical Rendu. As a result, when the Company agrees on a price with the French authorities, patients will be reimbursed for 100% of the cost of ILUVIEN under the Affection de Longue Duree, a specific program for severe chronic diseases such as diabetes. When comparing the clinical benefit of ILUVIEN to existing therapies (Amelioration du Service Medical Rendu or ASMR), the CT rated the product at "level IV" which will be used in considering the price and any reimbursement conditions for ILUVIEN in France.
In September 2013, the Company submitted an application to the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in the United Kingdom, as the Reference Member State, for ten additional EU country approvals through the Mutual Recognition Procedure.
The Company submitted a New Drug Application (NDA) in June 2010 for ILUVIEN in the U.S. with the FDA. The Company resubmitted its NDA with revisions in May 2011 and April 2013 to address matters raised in the FDA's Complete Response Letters (CRLs) relating to the NDA. In October 2013, the Company received a third CRL from the FDA stating that the NDA could not be approved in its current form. In the third CRL, the FDA identified clinical and statistical deficiencies and indicated that the benefits of ILUVIEN did not outweigh its risks. Further, the FDA also indicated that results from a new clinical trial would need to be submitted, together with at least 12 months of follow-up data for all enrolled patients, to support certain indications previously discussed with the FDA. The FDA suggested that a meeting with the Dermatologic and
7
Ophthalmic Drugs Advisory Committee may be of assistance in addressing the deficiencies identified above and providing advice whether a patient population can be identified in which the benefits of the drug product might outweigh the risks. In the third CRL, the FDA also referenced deficiencies in the methods and controls used for the drug product at the facility where ILUVIEN is manufactured. The Company does not believe that these deficiencies will affect its European commercial supply.
The Company was notified of a January 2014 meeting of the Advisory Committee, shortly after the issuance of the third CRL. In a subsequent communication with the FDA, the Company believes it clarified that the purpose of the Advisory Committee meeting was to consider the benefits and risks of ILUVIEN based on existing data available from its two completed Phase 3 pivotal clinical trials. A meeting with the FDA in preparation for the Advisory Committee resulted in labeling discussions for ILUVIEN, and the Company and the FDA agreed that the Advisory Committee was no longer necessary.
In March 2014, the Company resubmitted its NDA for ILUVIEN in response to the third CRL. In the resubmission, the Company responded to questions raised in the third CRL, addressed deficiencies noted in the methods and controls used for the drug product at the facility where ILUVIEN is manufactured and provided a safety update, which included commercial experience with ILUVIEN in Europe. In April 2014, the Company was notified by the FDA that the resubmission of its NDA for ILUVIEN had been acknowledged as received by the FDA as a complete class 2 response to the third CRL, and that a Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) goal date of September 26, 2014 had been established. The Company does not plan to conduct any new clinical trials in connection with the FDA's review of this submission.
2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The Company has prepared the accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto (interim financial statements) in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10-01 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and disclosures required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, which include normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the Company’s interim financial information.
The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 and related notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC on March 7, 2014. The financial results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the expected financial results for the full year.
3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting policies followed for quarterly financial reporting are the same as those disclosed in the Notes to Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2013.
8
4. FACTORS AFFECTING OPERATIONS
To date the Company has incurred recurring losses, negative cash flow from operations, and has accumulated a deficit of $298,104,000 from the Company’s inception through March 31, 2014. As of March 31, 2014, the Company had approximately $41,326,000 in cash and cash equivalents. In April 2014, Alimera Sciences Limited (Limited), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, refinanced its 2013 Term Loan resulting in net proceeds of approximately $4,700,000 (Note 8).
The Company believes that it has sufficient funds available to fund its operations beyond the projected commercialization of ILUVIEN in Germany, the United Kingdom and France in 2014. The Company does not expect the generation of positive cash flow from operations until 2015, at the earliest, if at all. If ILUVIEN is not approved in additional jurisdictions or does not generate sufficient revenue, the Company may adjust its commercial plans so that it can continue to operate with its existing cash resources or seek to raise additional financing.
The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company's recurring net losses, negative cash flow from operations and accumulated deficit raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The interim condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
5. INVENTORY
Inventory consisted of the following:
March 31, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | ||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||
Component parts (1) | $ | 268 | $ | 266 | |||
Work-in-process (2) | 594 | 587 | |||||
Finished goods | 1,217 | 1,343 | |||||
Total inventory | 2,079 | 2,196 | |||||
Inventory reserve | (845 | ) | (410 | ) | |||
Inventory — net | $ | 1,234 | $ | 1,786 |
(1) Component parts inventory consisted of manufactured components of the ILUVIEN applicator.
(2) Work-in-process consisted of completed units of ILUVIEN that are undergoing, but have not completed, quality assurance testing as required by regulatory authorities.
6. ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accrued expenses consisted of the following:
March 31, 2014 | December 31, 2013 | ||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||
Accrued clinical investigator expenses | $ | 311 | $ | 562 | |||
Accrued other compensation expenses | 325 | 106 | |||||
Other accrued expenses | 122 | 266 | |||||
Total accrued expenses | $ | 758 | $ | 934 |
9
7. LICENSE AGREEMENTS
The Company entered into an agreement with pSivida US, Inc. (pSivida) for the use of fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) in pSivida’s proprietary delivery device in February 2005, and a subsequent amendment in 2008. pSivida is a global drug delivery company committed to the biomedical sector and the development of drug delivery products. The agreement with pSivida provides the Company with a worldwide exclusive license to develop and sell ILUVIEN.
The Company’s license rights to pSivida’s proprietary delivery device could revert to pSivida if the Company were to (i) fail twice to cure its breach of an obligation to make certain payments to pSivida following receipt of written notice thereof; (ii) fail to cure other breaches of material terms of its agreement with pSivida within 30 days after notice of such breaches or such longer period (up to 90 days) as may be reasonably necessary if the breach cannot be cured within such 30-day period; (iii) file for protection under the bankruptcy laws, make an assignment for the benefit of creditors, appoint or suffer appointment of a receiver or trustee over its property, file a petition under any bankruptcy or insolvency act or have any such petition filed against it and such proceeding remains undismissed or unstayed for a period of more than 60 days; or (iv) notify pSivida in writing of its decision to abandon its license with respect to a certain product using pSivida’s proprietary delivery device.
Upon commercialization of ILUVIEN, the Company must share 20% of net profits and 33% of any lump sum milestone payments received from a sub-licensee of ILUVIEN, as defined by the agreement, with pSivida. In connection with this arrangement the Company is entitled to recover 20% of commercialization costs of ILUVIEN, as defined in the agreement, incurred prior to product profitability out of pSivida’s share of net profits. As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company was owed $12,386,000 and $12,219,000, respectively, in commercialization costs. Due to the uncertainty of future net profits, the Company has fully reserved these amounts in the accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company will owe pSivida an additional milestone payment of $25,000,000 if ILUVIEN is approved by the FDA (the pSivida Milestone Payment).
In November 2007, the Company entered into a license agreement with Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd. (Dainippon) whereby Dainippon granted the Company a non-exclusive, worldwide, royalty free license to patent rights under specific patents and patent applications. The Company paid $200,000 to Dainippon shortly after the execution of this license agreement and will be required to make an additional payment in the amount of $200,000 to Dainippon within 30 days following the first regulatory approval of a licensed product in the U.S. by the FDA.
10
8. LOAN AGREEMENTS
2010 Term Loan
The Company entered into a loan and security agreement with Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and MidCap Financial LLP (MidCap and together with SVB, the Lenders) in October 2010, which was subsequently amended in May 2011 (as amended, the 2010 Term Loan Agreement). Pursuant to the 2010 Term Loan Agreement, in October 2010 the Company borrowed an aggregate of $6,250,000 from the Lenders (the 2010 Term Loan). The 2010 Term Loan Agreement also provided for the ability to drawdown an additional $11,000,000 subject to FDA approval of the NDA for ILUVIEN by December 31, 2011, which was not obtained.
In August 2011, the Company began repaying the outstanding principal under the 2010 Term Loan in 33 equal monthly installments plus interest at a rate of 11.5%. At maturity, the Company was also required to make an additional interest payment equal to 4% of the total amount borrowed. The Company paid to the Lenders an upfront fee of $62,500 upon execution of the 2010 Term Loan Agreement and an additional fee of $50,000 in connection with the May 2011 amendment. In accordance with ASC 470-50-40-17, Debt - Modifications and Extinguishments (ASC 470-50-40-17), the Company was amortizing the deferred financing costs on the 2010 Term Loan and the $50,000 modification fee over the remaining term of the 2010 Term Loan, as modified.
In October 2010, in connection with entering into the 2010 Term Loan, the Company issued SVB a warrant to purchase up to 15,909 shares of the Company's common stock and MidCap a warrant to purchase up to 23,864 shares of the Company's common stock. Each of the warrants were exercisable upon issuance, had a per-share exercise price of $11.00 and a term of 10 years. The Company estimated the fair value of warrants granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model to be $389,000. The Company allocated a portion of the proceeds from the 2010 Term Loan to the warrants in accordance with ASC 470-20-25-2, Debt Instruments with Detachable Warrants. As a result, the Company recorded a discount of $366,000 which was amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method. The Lenders were also issued warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 69,999 additional shares of the Company's common stock, which were exercisable only upon the drawdown of the additional $11,000,000 subject to FDA approval of the NDA for ILUVIEN by December 31, 2011, which was not obtained.
In May 2013, the Company repaid all amounts owed to the Lenders under the 2010 Term Loan, including the final interest payment equal to 4% of the total amount borrowed, and a 1.0% prepayment penalty on the then outstanding principal owed to MidCap. In connection with the repayment of the 2010 Term Loan, and in accordance with ASC 470-50-40-17, the Company recognized a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $153,000 associated with the remaining unamortized deferred financing costs, unamortized discount associated with the Lenders' warrants, the final interest payment, the prepayment penalty and a lender fee and warrants associated with a new term loan.
2010 Revolving Loan Agreement
In October 2010, the Company and SVB entered into a loan and security agreement, which was subsequently amended in May 2011 (as amended, the 2010 Revolving Loan Agreement), pursuant to which the Company obtained a secured revolving line of credit from SVB against eligible U.S. domestic accounts receivable with borrowing availability up to $20,000,000. Upon entering into the 2010 Revolving Loan Agreement, the Company paid to SVB an upfront fee of $100,000. As of December 31, 2012, no amounts under the 2010 Revolving Loan Agreement were outstanding or available to the Company. In May 2013, the Company and SVB terminated the 2010 Revolving Loan Agreement.
2013 Loan Agreement
In May 2013, Limited entered into a loan and security agreement (2013 Loan Agreement) with SVB to provide Limited with additional working capital for general corporate purposes. Under the 2013 Loan Agreement, SVB made a term loan (2013 Term Loan) in the principal amount of $5,000,000 to Limited and agreed to provide up to an additional $15,000,000 to Limited under a working capital line of credit (2013 Line of Credit). No advances were made at closing under the 2013 Line of Credit and no amounts were outstanding as of March 31, 2014 or December 31, 2013. At March 31, 2014, Limited's ability to borrow under the 2013 Line of Credit was limited based on the Company's accounts receivable at that date as described below. In April 2014, the 2013 Term Loan was repaid and the 2013 Line of Credit was terminated in connection with the 2014 Loan Agreement described below.
The 2013 Term Loan provided for interest only payments for six months followed by 36 monthly payments of interest, plus principal. Limited made its first amortization payment on the 2013 Term Loan in December 2013. Interest on outstanding borrowings under the 2013 Term Loan were payable at the rate of 7.50%. Borrowings under the 2013 Line of Credit would have been advanced at 80% of eligible accounts receivable as defined in the 2013 Loan Agreement. Interest was payable on the balance of eligible accounts financed at the rate of 2.75% above SVB's most recently announced “prime rate.” Limited was also
11
required to pay SVB on a monthly basis an unused line fee equal to 0.25% per annum of the average unused portion of the 2013 Line of Credit during the preceding month. The maturity dates were June 30, 2015 with respect to the 2013 Line of Credit and October 31, 2016 with respect to the 2013 Term Loan.
In connection with entering into the 2013 Loan Agreement, Limited paid SVB a facility fee of $25,000. Additionally, the Company re-priced warrants to purchase an aggregate of up to 31,818 shares of the Company’s common stock previously issued to SVB in connection with an earlier term loan. Upon re-pricing, each of the warrants was exercisable immediately at a per-share exercise price of $2.86 and had a remaining term of 7.4 years. The Company estimated the incremental fair value received by SVB using the Black-Scholes option pricing model to be $46,000. In accordance with ASC 470-50-40-17, the Company expensed the facility fee and incremental value of the warrants associated with the 2013 Term Loan as part of the loss on early extinguishment of the earlier term loan.
In connection with the 2013 Line of Credit, Limited paid a commitment fee of $100,000. In accordance with ASC 470-50-40-17, the Company capitalized the commitment fee and $49,000 of deferred financing costs remaining on an earlier line of credit as deferred financing costs, which were being amortized over the remaining term of the 2013 Line of Credit.
Upon repayment of the 2013 Term Loan in April 2014, Limited paid SVB a prepayment penalty of 3% of the total principal amount then outstanding. In addition, Limited paid SVB a termination fee of $112,500 in connection with the termination of the 2013 Line of Credit in April 2014.
The weighted average interest rates of the Company's notes payable approximate the rate at which the Company could obtain alternative financing; therefore, the carrying amount of the notes approximated their fair value at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
2014 Loan Agreement
In April 2014, Limited entered into a loan and security agreement (2014 Term Loan) with Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc. (Hercules). Under the 2014 Term Loan, Hercules made an advance in the initial principal amount of $10,000,000 to Limited at closing to provide Limited with additional working capital for general corporate purposes and to repay the 2013 Term Loan. Hercules also agreed to provide up to an additional $25,000,000 to Limited upon approval of ILUVIEN by the FDA on or prior to October 31, 2014 to fund the pSivida Milestone Payment. The 2014 Term Loan provides for interest only payments for 18 months. The interest only period may be extended by an additional 18 months if the Company realizes certain revenue thresholds and no event of default has occurred under the 2014 Loan Agreement. Interest on the 2014 Term Loan accrues at a floating per annum rate equal to the greater of (i) 10.90%, or (ii) the sum of (A) 10.90%, plus (B) the prime rate as reported in The Wall Street Journal, or if not reported, the prime rate most recently reported in The Wall Street Journal, minus 3.25%. Following the interest only period the term loan will be due and payable to Hercules in equal monthly payments of principal and interest through May 1, 2018.
Limited paid to Hercules a facility charge of $262,500 and incurred legal and other fees of approximately $87,000 in connection with the 2014 Term Loan. If Limited repays the 2014 Term Loan prior to maturity, it will pay Hercules a prepayment penalty of 1.25% of the total principal amount repaid.
Limited and the Company, on a consolidated basis with its other subsidiaries, also agreed to customary affirmative and negative covenants and events of default in connection with these arrangements. The occurrence of an event of default could result in the acceleration of Limited’s obligations under the Loan Agreement and an increase to the applicable interest rate, and would permit Hercules to exercise remedies with respect to the collateral under the Loan Agreement.
Limited’s obligations to Hercules are secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of Limited’s assets, excluding intellectual property. Hercules does, however, maintain a negative pledge on Limited’s intellectual property requiring Hercules' consent prior to the sale of such intellectual property. The Company and certain of the Company’s other subsidiaries are guarantors of the obligations of Limited to Hercules under the Loan Agreement pursuant to separate guaranty agreements between Hercules and each of Limited and such subsidiaries (Guaranties). Pursuant to the Guaranties, the Company and these subsidiaries granted Hercules a first priority security interest in substantially all of their respective assets excluding intellectual property.
In connection with Limited entering into the 2014 Loan Agreement, the Company entered into a warrant agreement with Hercules to purchase up to 285,016 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $6.14 per share. Sixty percent of the warrants were exercisable at closing and the remaining 40% will become exercisable if the remaining $25,000,000 is advanced to the Company prior to October 31, 2014.
12
9. LOSS PER SHARE (EPS)
Basic EPS is calculated in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings per Share, by dividing net income or loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average common stock outstanding. Diluted EPS is calculated in accordance with ASC 260 by adjusting weighted average common shares outstanding for the dilutive effect of common stock options, warrants, convertible preferred stock and accrued but unpaid convertible preferred stock dividends. In periods where a net loss is recorded, no effect is given to potentially dilutive securities, since the effect would be anti-dilutive. Weighted average securities that would have diluted basic EPS, but were not included in the computation of diluted EPS because to do so would have been anti-dilutive, were as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||
2014 | 2013 | ||||
Series A convertible preferred stock | 15,037,594 | — | |||
Series A convertible preferred stock warrants | 2,471,478 | — | |||
Common stock warrants | 14,994 | 3,115 | |||
Stock options | 4,600,750 | 1,399,554 | |||
Total | 22,124,816 | 1,402,669 |
13
10. PREFERRED STOCK
On October 2, 2012, the Company closed its preferred stock financing in which it sold units consisting of 1,000,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and warrants to purchase 300,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock for gross proceeds of $40,000,000, prior to the payment of approximately $560,000 of related issuance costs. The powers, preferences and rights of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock are set forth in the certificate of designation filed by the Company with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on October 1, 2012. Each share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, including any shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock issued upon exercise of the warrants, is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at any time at the option of the holder at the rate equal to $40.00 divided by the then current conversion price (Conversion Price). The initial Conversion Price of $2.91 of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock was subject to adjustment to $3.16 or $2.66 based on the occurrence or non-occurrence of certain events relating to guidance from NICE regarding ILUVIEN, in addition to certain customary price based anti-dilution adjustments. Each share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock shall automatically be converted into shares of common stock at the then-effective Conversion Price upon the occurrence of the later to occur of both (i) the Company receives and publicly announces the approval by the FDA of the Company’s NDA for ILUVIEN and (ii) the date on which the Company consummates an equity financing transaction pursuant to which the Company sells to one or more third party investors either (a) shares of common stock or (b) other equity securities that are convertible into shares of common stock and that have rights, preference or privileges, senior to or on a parity with, the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, in each case having an as-converted per share of common stock price of not less than $10.00 and that results in total gross proceeds to the Company of at least $30,000,000. The rights and preferences of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock also place limitations on the Company's ability to declare or pay any dividend or distribution on any shares of capital stock.
On June 30, 2013, the Conversion Price was automatically adjusted to $2.66. As a result of the adjustment to the Conversion Price, the value of the common stock underlying the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock at issuance exceeded the amount of the net proceeds allocated to the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock at issuance. Therefore, the Company recorded the contingent beneficial conversion feature of $4,950,000 as an increase in additional paid in capital. Because the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock was immediately convertible into common stock at the option of the holder on June 30, 2013, the Company immediately accreted the full value of the beneficial conversion feature to the carrying value of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock on that date.
Each unit sold in the preferred stock financing included a warrant to purchase 0.30 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock at an exercise price equal to $44.00 per share. At the election of the holder of a warrant, the warrant may be exercised for the number of shares of common stock then issuable upon conversion of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock that would otherwise be issued upon such exercise at the then-effective Conversion Price.
These warrants are considered derivative instruments because the agreements provide for settlement in Series A Convertible Preferred Stock shares or common stock shares at the option of the holder, an adjustment to the warrant exercise price for common shares at some point in the future, and contain anti-dilution provisions whereby the number of shares for which the warrants are exercisable and/or the exercise price of the warrants are subject to change in the event of certain issuances of stock at prices below the then-effective exercise price of the warrants. Therefore the warrants were recorded as a liability at issuance. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the fair market value of the warrants was estimated to be $29,511,000 and $16,381,000, respectively. The Company recorded a loss of $13,130,000 and $5,594,000 as a result of the change in fair value of the warrants during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
In April 2014, 2,255,639 shares of common stock were issued pursuant to a conversion of 150,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock held by an investor.
11. COMMON STOCK
In January 2014, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with certain investors pursuant to which the Company sold an aggregate of 6,250,000 shares of its common stock at a purchase price of $6.00 per share. Gross proceeds from the offering were $37,500,000 prior to the payment of approximately $2,389,000 of related issuance costs. Proceeds from the private placement are expected to be used for general corporate and working capital purposes.
14
12. STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS
Stock Option Plans
During the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company recorded compensation expense related to stock options of approximately $925,000 and $529,000, respectively. As of March 31, 2014, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options granted was $5,203,000 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.95 years. The following table presents a summary of stock option transactions for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013:
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||
Options | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Options | Weighted Average Exercise Price | ||||||||||||
Options outstanding at beginning of period | 7,566,438 | $ | 2.74 | 5,493,079 | $ | 2.67 | |||||||||
Grants | — | — | 387,500 | 2.12 | |||||||||||
Forfeitures | — | — | (15,912 | ) | 2.20 | ||||||||||
Exercises | (157,461 | ) | 1.82 | (14,829 | ) | 4.70 | |||||||||
Options outstanding at period end | 7,408,977 | 2.76 | 5,849,838 | 2.63 | |||||||||||
Options exercisable at period end | 3,584,416 | 3.14 | 2,694,620 | 3.02 | |||||||||||
Weighted average per share fair value of options granted during the period | $ | — | $ | 1.66 |
The following table provides additional information related to outstanding stock options, exercisable stock options, and stock options expected to vest as of March 31, 2014:
Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Weighted Average Contractual Term | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | |||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Outstanding | 7,408,977 | $ | 2.76 | 7.48 years | $ | 39,208 | ||||||
Exercisable | 3,584,416 | 3.14 | 5.75 years | 18,051 | ||||||||
Expected to vest | 3,094,845 | 2.41 | 9.03 years | 17,138 |
The following table provides additional information related to outstanding stock options, exercisable stock options, and stock options expected to vest as of December 31, 2013:
Shares | Weighted Average Exercise Price | Weighted Average Contractual Term | Aggregate Intrinsic Value | |||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Outstanding | 7,566,438 | $ | 2.74 | 7.63 years | $ | 17,759 | ||||||
Exercisable | 3,304,981 | 3.09 | 5.45 years | 7,589 | ||||||||
Expected to vest | 3,469,118 | 2.48 | 9.25 years | 8,314 |
15
13. INCOME TAXES
In accordance with ASC 740, the Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of its assets and liabilities at the enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company records a valuation allowance against its net deferred tax asset to reduce the net carrying value to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized.
Income tax positions are considered for uncertainty in accordance with ASC 740-10. The Company believes that its income tax filing positions and deductions are more likely than not to be sustained on audit and the Company does not anticipate any adjustments that will result in a material change in its financial position; therefore, no ASC 740-10 liabilities and no related penalties and interest have been recorded. The Company does not anticipate any material changes to its uncertain tax positions within the next 12 months. Tax years since 2003 remain subject to examination in Georgia, Tennessee, and at the federal level. The time period is longer than the standard statutory 3-year period due to net operating losses (NOLs) from 2003 being available for utilization. The statute of limitations on these years will close when the NOLs expire or when the statute closes on the years in which the NOLs are utilized.
Significant management judgment is involved in determining the provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and any valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets. Due to uncertainties with respect to the realization of deferred tax assets due to the history of operating losses, a valuation allowance has been established against the entire net deferred tax asset balance. The valuation allowance is based on management’s estimates of taxable income in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates and the period over which deferred tax assets will be recoverable. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates or the Company adjusts these estimates in future periods, a change in the valuation allowance may be needed, which could materially impact its financial position and results of operations.
At December 31, 2013, the Company had federal NOL carryforwards of approximately 82,380,000 and state NOL carryforwards of approximately $65,840,000 available to reduce future income. The Company's federal NOL carry-forwards remain fully reserved as of March 31, 2014. If not utilized, the federal NOL carryforwards will expire at various dates between 2028 and 2032 and the state NOL carryforwards will expire at various dates between 2020 and 2032.
The Company's NOL carryforwards may be subject to annual limitations under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 382 (or comparable provisions of state law) in the event that certain changes in ownership of the Company were to occur. The Company periodically evaluates its NOL carryforwards and whether certain changes in ownership, including its IPO, have occurred that would limit its ability to utilize a portion of the Company's NOL carryforwards. If it is determined that significant ownership changes have occurred since the Company generated its NOL carryforwards, the Company may be subject to annual limitations on the use of these NOL carryforwards under IRC Section 382 (or comparable provisions of state law).
The Company's foreign subsidiaries in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom commenced business during 2013 and have incurred NOLs to date. The NOL carryforwards of the foreign entities are fully reserved as of March 31, 2014. The Company has not recorded a deferred tax asset for the excess of tax over book basis in the stock of its foreign subsidiaries. The Company anticipates that its foreign subsidiaries will be profitable and will have earnings in the future. Once the Company's foreign subsidiaries have earnings, the Company intends to indefinitely reinvest in its foreign subsidiaries all undistributed earnings of and original investments in such subsidiaries. As a result, the Company does not expect to record deferred tax liabilities in the future related to excesses of book over tax basis in the stock of its foreign subsidiaries in accordance with ASC 740-30-25.
16
14. FAIR VALUE
The Company applies ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements, in determining the fair value of certain assets and liabilities. Under this standard, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., the “exit price”) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
In determining fair value, the Company uses various valuation approaches. The hierarchy of those valuation approaches is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:
Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. An active market for the asset or liability is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. The valuation under this approach does not entail a significant degree of judgment.
Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, (e.g., interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals or current market) and contractual prices for the underlying financial instrument, as well as other relevant economic measures.
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs shall be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available, thereby allowing for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date.
There have been no changes in the methodologies used at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
The following fair value table presents information about the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
March 31, 2014 | |||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||||
Cash equivalents (1) | $ | 33,194 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 33,194 | |||||||
Assets measured at fair value | $ | 33,194 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 33,194 | |||||||
Liabilities: | |||||||||||||||
Derivative warrant liability (2) | $ | — | $ | 29,511 | $ | — | $ | 29,511 | |||||||
Liabilities measured at fair value | $ | — | $ | 29,511 | $ | — | $ | 29,511 |
December 31, 2013 | |||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | ||||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||||
Cash equivalents (1) | $ | 6,944 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 6,944 | |||||||
Assets measured at fair value | $ | 6,944 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 6,944 | |||||||
Liabilities: | |||||||||||||||
Derivative warrant liability (2) | $ | — | $ | 16,381 | $ | — | $ | 16,381 | |||||||
Liabilities measured at fair value | $ | — | $ | 16,381 | $ | — | $ | 16,381 |
(1) | The carrying amounts approximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of the cash equivalents. |
(2) | The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model and assumptions that consider, among other variables, the fair value of the underlying stock, risk-free interest rate, volatility, expected life and dividend rates in estimating fair value for the warrants considered to be derivative instruments. Assumptions used are generally consistent with those disclosed for stock based compensation (see Note 12). |
17
ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND PROJECTIONS
Various statements in this report are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements involve substantial risks and uncertainties. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included in this report regarding our strategy, future operations, future financial position, future revenues, projected costs, prospects, plans and objectives of management are forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and are based on information currently available to our management. Words such as, but not limited to, “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “contemplates,” “predict,” “project,” “target,” “likely,” “potential,” “continue,” “ongoing,” “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” or the negative of these terms and similar expressions or words, identify forward-looking statements. The events and circumstances reflected in our forward-looking statements may not occur and actual results could differ materially from those projected in our forward-looking statements. Meaningful factors which could cause actual results to differ include, but are not limited to:
• | uncertainty as to our ability to commercialize ILUVIEN in the European Union (EU); |
• | our limited sales and marketing infrastructure; |
• | delay in or failure to obtain regulatory approval of ILUVIEN or any future products or product candidates; |
• | our inability to successfully market and sell ILUVIEN following regulatory approval in additional markets; |
• | uncertainty as to the pricing and reimbursement guidelines for ILUVIEN or any future products or product candidates, including ILUVIEN in the various EU countries; |
• | uncertainty as to the relationship between the benefits of ILUVIEN or any future products or product candidates and the risks of their side-effect profiles; |
• | dependence on third-party manufacturers to manufacture ILUVIEN or any future products or product candidates in sufficient quantities and quality; |
• | the extent of government regulations; |
• | uncertainty of clinical trial results; |
• | our ability to operate our business in compliance with the covenants and restrictions that we are subject to under our credit facility; and |
• | our ability to raise sufficient additional financing. |
All written and verbal forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. We caution investors not to rely too heavily on the forward-looking statements we make or that are made on our behalf. We undertake no obligation, and specifically decline any obligation, to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You are advised, however, to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects in any annual, quarterly or current reports that we may file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
We encourage you to read the discussion and analysis of our financial condition and our unaudited interim financial statements contained in this report. We also encourage you to read Item 1A of Part II of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q entitled “Risk Factors” and Item 1A of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, which contains a more complete discussion of the risks and uncertainties associated with our business. In addition to the risks described above and in Item 1A of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, other unknown or unpredictable factors also could affect our results. There can be no assurance that the actual results or developments anticipated by us will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the expected consequences to, or effects on, us. Therefore, no assurance can be given that the outcomes stated in such forward-looking statements and estimates will be achieved.
18
Overview
Alimera Sciences, Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (we, Alimera or the Company), is a biopharmaceutical company that specializes in the research, development and commercialization of prescription ophthalmic pharmaceuticals. We are presently focused on diseases affecting the back of the eye, or retina, because we believe these diseases are not well treated with current therapies and represent a significant market opportunity. We were formed on June 4, 2003 under the laws of the State of Delaware.
Our only commercial product is ILUVIEN®, which has received marketing authorization in the United Kingdom, Austria, Portugal, France, Germany and Spain, and has been recommended for marketing authorization in Italy, for the treatment of vision impairment associated with chronic diabetic macular edema (DME) considered insufficiently responsive to available therapies. DME is a disease of the retina that affects individuals with diabetes and can lead to severe vision loss and blindness. ILUVIEN is the first product approved for chronic DME in the United Kingdom and European Union (EU). As part of the approval process in these countries, we have committed to conduct a five-year, post-authorization, open label registry study of ILUVIEN in 800 patients treated per the labeled indication. ILUVIEN has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
We launched ILUVIEN in the United Kingdom and Germany, in April and May of 2013, respectively, and currently plan to launch ILUVIEN in France in late 2014. We were able to launch in Germany without price restriction, but continue to work with the statutory health insurance funds in Germany to streamline reimbursement for ILUVIEN.
In January 2013, the United Kingdom’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) published final guidance for England and Wales indicating that ILUVIEN does not satisfy NICE's definition of cost effectiveness for the treatment of vision impairment associated with chronic DME considered insufficiently responsive to available therapies given the cost of £5,500. We submitted a simple patient access scheme (PAS) for ILUVIEN to NICE for consideration under its rapid review facility. In October 2013, the NICE Appraisal Committee issued a positive Final Appraisal Determination recommending ILUVIEN funding for the treatment of pseudophakic eyes (eyes with an artificial lens) in chronic DME patients considered insufficiently responsive to available therapies and the final technology appraisal guidance was published in November 2013. The technology appraisal guidance reverses the published guidance issued by NICE in January 2013, and takes into consideration the PAS. NICE requires clinical commissioning groups, National Health Service (NHS) England and Wales and local public health authorities to comply with the recommendations in the final guidance within three months of its date of publication. We began receiving orders for ILUVIEN from several NHS facilities in January 2014, indicating early implementation of the NICE guidance in certain NHS facilities. Further, in February 2014, the Scottish Medicines Consortium, after completing its assessment and review of a similar simple PAS, announced that is has accepted ILUVIEN for restricted use within the NHS Scotland.
In July 2013, the Transparency Commission (Commission de la Transparence or CT) of the French National Health Authority (Haute Autorite de Sante) issued a favorable opinion for the reimbursement and hospital listing of ILUVIEN by the French National Health Insurance for the treatment of chronic DME considered insufficiently responsive to available therapies. In the opinion, ILUVIEN was deemed as providing a "moderate medical benefit" as defined by the Service Medical Rendu. As a result, when we agree on a price with the French authorities, patients will be reimbursed for 100% of the cost of ILUVIEN under the Affection de Longue Duree, a specific program for severe chronic diseases such as diabetes. When comparing the clinical benefit of ILUVIEN to existing therapies (Amelioration du Service Medical Rendu or ASMR), the CT rated the product at "level IV" which will be used in considering the price and any reimbursement conditions for ILUVIEN in France.
In September 2013, we submitted an application to the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency in the United Kingdom, as the Reference Member State, for ten additional European Union country approvals through the Mutual Recognition Procedure.
We submitted a New Drug Application (NDA) in June 2010 for ILUVIEN in the U.S. with the FDA. We resubmitted our NDA with revisions in May 2011 and April 2013 to address matters raised in the FDA's Complete Response Letters (CRLs) relating to the NDA. In October 2013, we received a third CRL from the FDA stating that the NDA could not be approved in its current form. In the third CRL, the FDA identified clinical and statistical deficiencies and indicated that the benefits of ILUVIEN did not outweigh its risks. Further, the FDA also indicated that results from a new clinical trial would need to be submitted, together with at least 12 months of follow-up data for all enrolled patients, to support certain indications previously discussed with the FDA. The FDA suggested that a meeting with the Dermatologic and Ophthalmic Drugs Advisory Committee may be of assistance in addressing the deficiencies identified above and providing advice whether a patient population can be identified in which the benefits of the drug product might outweigh the risks.
19
In the third CRL, the FDA also referenced deficiencies in the methods and controls used for the drug product at the facility where ILUVIEN is manufactured. We do not believe that these deficiencies will affect our European commercial supply of ILUVIEN.
We were notified of a January 2014 meeting of the Advisory Committee shortly after the issuance of the third CRL. In a subsequent communication with the FDA, we believe we clarified that the purpose of the Advisory Committee meeting was to consider the benefits and risks of ILUVIEN based on existing data available from our two completed Phase 3 pivotal clinical trials (collectively, our FAME Study). A meeting with the FDA in preparation for the Advisory Committee resulted in labeling discussions for ILUVIEN, and we and the FDA agreed that the Advisory Committee was no longer necessary.
In March 2014, we resubmitted our NDA for ILUVIEN in response to the third CRL. In the resubmission, we responded to questions raised in the third CRL, addressed deficiencies noted in the methods and controls used for the drug product at the facility where ILUVIEN is manufactured and provided a safety update, which included commercial experience with ILUVIEN in Europe. In April 2014, we were notified by the FDA that the resubmission of our NDA for ILUVIEN had been acknowledged as received by the FDA as a complete class 2 response to the third CRL, and that a Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) goal date of September 26, 2014 had been established. We do not plan to conduct any new clinical trials in connection with the FDA's review of this submission.
We commenced operations on June 4, 2003. Since our inception we have incurred significant losses. As of March 31, 2014, we have accumulated a deficit of $298.1 million. We expect to incur substantial losses as we:
• | continue the commercialization of ILUVIEN in the EU; |
• | complete the clinical development and registration of ILUVIEN for DME; |
• | continue to seek regulatory approval of ILUVIEN in the U.S. and other jurisdictions; |
• | evaluate the use of ILUVIEN for the treatment of other diseases; and |
• | advance the clinical development of any future products or product candidates either currently in our pipeline, or that we may license or acquire in the future. |
As of March 31, 2014, we had approximately $41.3 million in cash and cash equivalents. In April 2014, we refinanced our 2013 Term Loan resulting in net proceeds of $4.7 million.
We launched ILUVIEN in the United Kingdom and Germany, in April and May of 2013, respectively, and currently plan to launch ILUVIEN in France in late 2014. We do not expect to have positive cash flow from operations until 2015, if at all. Due to the limited revenue generated by ILUVIEN to date, we may not be able to maintain compliance with covenants under our loan agreements. In an event of default, our lender may call the 2014 Loan Agreement, and we would most likely need to raise additional financing. If we are unable to obtain additional financing, we will need to adjust our commercial plans so that we can continue to operate with our existing cash resources or there may be substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
Our Agreement with pSivida US, Inc.
We entered into an agreement with pSivida US, Inc. (pSivida) in February 2005, which was subsequently amended and restated in March 2008, for the use of fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) in pSivida’s proprietary delivery device. pSivida is a global drug delivery company committed to the biomedical sector and the development of drug delivery products. Our agreement with pSivida provides us with a worldwide exclusive license to develop and sell ILUVIEN, which consists of a tiny polyimide tube with membrane caps that is filled with FAc in a polyvinyl alcohol matrix for delivery to the back of the eye for the treatment and prevention of eye diseases in humans (other than uveitis). This agreement also provides us with a worldwide non-exclusive license to develop and sell pSivida’s proprietary delivery device to deliver other corticosteroids to the back of the eye for the treatment and prevention of eye diseases in humans (other than uveitis) or to treat DME by delivering a compound to the back of the eye through a direct delivery method through an incision required for a 25-gauge or larger needle. We do not have the right to develop and sell pSivida’s proprietary delivery device for indications for diseases outside of the eye or for the treatment of uveitis. Further, our agreement with pSivida permits pSivida to grant to any other party the right to use its intellectual property (i) to treat DME through an incision smaller than that required for a 25-gauge needle, unless using a corticosteroid delivered to the back of the eye, (ii) to deliver any compound outside the back of the eye unless it is to treat DME through an incision required for a 25-gauge or larger needle, or (iii) to deliver non-corticosteroids to the back of the eye, unless it is to treat DME through an incision required for a 25-gauge or larger needle.
The agreement provides that after commercialization of ILUVIEN, pSivida will be entitled to 20% of the net profits. In connection with this arrangement we are entitled to recover 20% of commercialization costs of ILUVIEN, as defined in the
20
agreement, incurred prior to product profitability out of pSivida’s share of net profits. As of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, pSivida owed us $12.4 million and $12.2 million, respectively, in commercialization costs. Due to the uncertainty of future profits from ILUVIEN, we have fully reserved these amounts in the accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
We will owe pSivida an additional milestone payment of $25.0 million if ILUVIEN is approved by the FDA (the pSivida Milestone Payment). If we were to enter into any sub-license of ILUVIEN, we must share 20% of net profits and 33% of any lump sum milestone payments received from a sub-licensee, as defined in the agreement, with pSivida.
Our Loan Agreements
2010 Term Loan
In October 2010, we entered into a loan and security agreement with Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and MidCap Financial LLP (MidCap and together with SVB, the Lenders), which was subsequently amended in May 2011 (as amended, the 2010 Term Loan Agreement). Pursuant to the 2010 Term Loan Agreement, in October 2010 we borrowed an aggregate of $6.25 million from the Lenders (the 2010 Term Loan). The 2010 Term Loan Agreement also provided for the ability to drawdown an additional $11.0 million subject to FDA approval of the NDA for ILUVIEN by December 31, 2011, which was not obtained.
In August 2011, we began repaying the outstanding principal under the 2010 Term Loan in 33 equal monthly installments plus interest at a rate of 11.5%. At maturity, we were also required to make an additional interest payment equal to 4% of the total amount borrowed. We paid to the Lenders an upfront fee of $62,500 upon execution of the 2010 Term Loan Agreement and an additional fee of $50,000 in connection with the May 2011 amendment. In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standard Codification (ASC) 470-50-40-17, Debt - Modifications and Extinguishments (ASC 470-50-40-17), we were amortizing the deferred financing costs on the 2010 Term Loan and the $50,000 modification fee over the remaining term of the 2010 Term Loan, as modified.
In October 2010, in connection with entering into the 2010 Term Loan, we issued SVB a warrant to purchase up to 15,909 shares of our common stock and MidCap a warrant to purchase up to 23,864 shares of our common stock. Each of the warrants were exercisable upon issuance, had a per-share exercise price of $11.00 and a term of 10 years. We estimated the fair value of warrants granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model to be $389,000. We allocated a portion of the proceeds from the 2010 Term Loan to the warrants in accordance with ASC 470-20-25-2, Debt Instruments with Detachable Warrants. As a result, we recorded a discount of $366,000 which was amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method. The Lenders were also issued warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 69,999 additional shares of our common stock, which were exercisable only upon the drawdown of the additional $11.0 million subject to FDA approval of the NDA for ILUVIEN by December 31, 2011, which was not obtained. In May 2013, we repaid all amounts owed to the Lenders under the 2010 Term Loan, including the final interest payment equal to 4% of the total amount borrowed, and a 1.0% prepayment penalty on the then outstanding principal owed to MidCap. In connection with the repayment of the 2010 Term Loan, we recognized a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $153,000 associated with the remaining unamortized deferred financing costs, unamortized discount associated with the Lenders' warrants, the final interest payment, the prepayment penalty and a lender fee and warrants associated with a new term loan.
2010 Revolving Loan Agreement
In October 2010, we entered into a loan and security agreement with SVB, which was subsequently amended in May 2011 (as amended, the 2010 Revolving Loan Agreement), pursuant to which we obtained a secured revolving line of credit from SVB against eligible U.S. domestic accounts receivable with borrowing availability up to $20.0 million. Upon entering into the 2010 Revolving Loan Agreement, we paid to SVB an upfront fee of $100,000. As of December 31, 2012, no amounts under the 2010 Revolving Loan Agreement were outstanding or available to us. In May 2013, we terminated the 2010 Revolving Loan Agreement.
2013 Loan Agreement
In May 2013, Alimera Sciences Limited (Limited), our subsidiary, entered into a loan and security agreement (2013 Loan Agreement) with Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) to provide Limited with additional working capital for general corporate purposes. Under the 2013 Loan Agreement, SVB has made a term loan (2013 Term Loan) in the principal amount of $5.0 million to Limited and has agreed to provide up to an additional $15.0 million to Limited under a working capital line of credit (2013 Line of Credit). No advances were made at closing under the 2013 Line of Credit and no amounts were outstanding as of March 31, 2014 or December 31, 2013, respectively. At March 31, 2014, Limited's ability to borrow under the 2013 Line of Credit was limited based on the Company's accounts receivable at that date as described below. In April 2014, the 2013 Term Loan was repaid and the 2013 Line of Credit was terminated in connection with the 2014 Loan Agreement described below.
21
The 2013 Term Loan provided for interest only payments for six months followed by 36 monthly payments of interest, plus principal. We made our first amortization payment on the 2013 Term Loan in December 2013. Interest on outstanding borrowings under the 2013 Term Loan were payable at the rate of 7.50%. Borrowings under the 2013 Line of Credit would have been advanced at 80% of eligible accounts receivable as defined in the 2013 Loan Agreement. Interest was payable on the balance of eligible accounts financed at the rate of 2.75% above SVB's most recently announced “prime rate.” Limited was also required to pay SVB on a monthly basis an unused line fee equal to 0.25% per annum of the average unused portion of the 2013 Line of Credit during the preceding month. The maturity dates were June 30, 2015 with respect to the 2013 Line of Credit and October 31, 2016 with respect to the 2013 Term Loan.
In connection with entering into the 2013 Loan Agreement, Limited paid SVB a facility fee of $25,000. Additionally, we re-priced warrants to purchase an aggregate of up to 31,818 shares of our common stock previously issued to SVB in connection with an earlier term loan. Upon re-pricing, each of the warrants was exercisable immediately at a per-share exercise price of $2.86 and had a remaining term of 7.4 years. We estimated the incremental fair value received by SVB using the Black-Scholes option pricing model to be $46,000. In accordance with ASC 470-50-40-17, we expensed the facility fee and incremental value of the warrants associated with the 2013 Term Loan as part of a loss on early extinguishment of the earlier term loan.
In connection with the 2013 Line of Credit, Limited paid commitment fee of $100,000. In accordance with ASC 470-50-40-17, we capitalized the commitment fee and $49,000 of deferred financing costs remaining on an earlier line of credit as deferred financing costs, which were being amortized over the remaining term of the 2013 Line of Credit.
The weighted average interest rates of our notes payable approximate the rate at which we could obtain alternative financing; therefore, the carrying amount of the notes approximated their fair value at December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2013.
2014 Loan Agreement
In April 2014, Limited entered into a loan and security agreement (2014 Loan Agreement) with Hercules Technology Growth Capital, Inc. (Hercules). Under the 2014 Loan Agreement, Hercules made a term loan advance in the initial principal amount of $10.0 million to Limited at closing to provide Limited with additional working capital for general corporate purposes and to repay the 2013 Term Loan. Hercules also agreed to provide up to an additional $25.0 million to Limited upon approval of ILUVIEN by the FDA on or prior to October 31, 2014 to fund the pSivida Milestone Payment. The 2014 Term Loan provides for interest only payments for 18 months. The interest only period may be extended by an additional 18 months if we realize certain revenue thresholds and no event of default has occurred under the 2014 Loan Agreement. Interest on the 2014 Term Loan accrues at a floating per annum rate equal to the greater of (i) 10.90%, or (ii) the sum of (A) 10.90%, plus (B) the prime rate as reported in The Wall Street Journal, or if not reported, the prime rate most recently reported in The Wall Street Journal, minus 3.25%. Following the interest only period the term loan will be due and payable to Hercules in equal monthly payments of principal and interest through May 1, 2018.
Limited paid to Hercules a facility charge of $262,500 and incurred legal and other fees of approximately $87,000 in connection with the 2014 Term Loan. If Limited repays the Term Loan prior to maturity, it will pay Hercules a prepayment penalty of 1.25% of the total principal amount repaid.
We also agreed to customary affirmative and negative covenants and events of default in connection with these arrangements. The occurrence of an event of default could result in the acceleration of Limited’s obligations under the Loan Agreement and an increase to the applicable interest rate, and would permit Hercules to exercise remedies with respect to the collateral under the Loan Agreement.
Limited’s obligations to Hercules are secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of Limited’s assets, excluding intellectual property. Hercules does, however, maintain a negative pledge on Limited’s intellectual property requiring Hercules' consent prior to the sale of such intellectual property. We and certain of our subsidiaries are guarantors of the obligations of Limited to Hercules under the Loan Agreement pursuant to separate guaranty agreements between Hercules and each of Limited and such subsidiaries (Guaranties). Pursuant to the Guaranties, we and these subsidiaries granted Hercules a first priority security interest in substantially all of their respective assets excluding intellectual property.
In connection with Limited entering into the 2014 Loan Agreement, we entered into a warrant agreement with Hercules to purchase up to 285,016 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $6.14 per share. Sixty percent of the warrants were exercisable at closing and the remaining 40% will become exercisable if the remaining $25.0 million is advanced to us prior to October 31, 2014.
22
Financial Operations Overview
Revenue
We began generating revenue from ILUVIEN in the second quarter of 2013, but do not expect positive cash flow from operations until 2015, if at all. In addition to generating revenue from product sales, we intend to seek to generate revenue from other sources such as upfront fees, milestone payments in connection with collaborative or strategic relationships, and royalties resulting from the licensing of ILUVIEN or any future product candidates and other intellectual property. We expect any revenue we generate will fluctuate from quarter to quarter as a result of the nature, timing and amount of any milestone payments we may receive from potential collaborative and strategic relationships, as well as revenue we may receive upon the sale of our products to the extent any are successfully commercialized.
Research and Development Expenses
Substantially all of our research and development expenses incurred to date related to our continuing operations have been related to the development of ILUVIEN. In the event the FDA approves our NDA for ILUVIEN, we will owe an additional milestone payment of $25.0 million to pSivida. We anticipate that we will incur additional research and development expenses in the future as we evaluate and possibly pursue the regulatory approval of ILUVIEN in additional jurisdictions, the development of ILUVIEN for additional indications, or develop additional products or product candidates. We recognize research and development expenses as they are incurred. Our research and development expenses consist primarily of:
• | salaries and related expenses for personnel; |
• | fees paid to consultants and contract research organizations (CRO) in conjunction with independently monitoring clinical trials and acquiring and evaluating data in conjunction with clinical trials, including all related fees such as investigator grants, patient screening, lab work and data compilation and statistical analysis; |
• | costs incurred with third parties related to the establishment of a commercially viable manufacturing process for ILUVIEN or any future products or product candidates; |
• | costs related to production of clinical materials, including fees paid to contract manufacturers; |
• | costs related to upfront and milestone payments under in-licensing agreements; |
• | costs related to compliance with FDA, EU or other regulatory requirements; |
• | consulting fees paid to third-parties involved in research and development activities; and |
• | costs related to stock options or other stock-based compensation granted to personnel in development functions. |
We expense both internal and external development costs as they are incurred.
We expect that a large percentage of our research and development expenses in the future will be incurred in support of our current and future technical, preclinical and clinical development programs. These expenditures are subject to numerous uncertainties in terms of both their timing and total cost to completion. We expect to continue to develop stable formulations of ILUVIEN or any future products or product candidates, test such formulations in preclinical studies for toxicology, safety and efficacy and to conduct clinical trials for each future product candidate. We anticipate funding clinical trials ourselves, but we may engage collaboration partners at certain stages of clinical development. As we obtain results from clinical trials, we may elect to discontinue or delay clinical trials for certain products or product candidates or programs in order to focus our resources on more promising products or product candidates or programs. Completion of clinical trials by us or our future collaborators may take several years or more, the length of time generally varying with the type, complexity, novelty and intended use of a product candidate. The costs of clinical trials may vary significantly over the life of a project owing to but not limited to the following:
• | the number of sites included in the trials; |
• | the length of time required to enroll eligible patients; |
• | the number of patients that participate in the trials; |
• | the number of doses that patients receive; |
• | the drop-out or discontinuation rates of patients; |
• | the duration of patient follow-up; |
• | the phase of development the product candidate is in; and |
• | the efficacy and safety profile of the product candidate. |
23
Our expenses related to clinical trials are based on estimates of the services received and efforts expended pursuant to contracts with multiple research institutions and CROs that conduct and manage clinical trials on our behalf. The financial terms of these agreements are subject to negotiation and vary from contract to contract and may result in uneven payment flows. Generally, these agreements set forth the scope of work to be performed at a fixed fee or unit price. Payments under the contracts depend on factors such as the successful enrollment of patients or the completion of clinical trial milestones. Expenses related to clinical trials generally are accrued based on contracted amounts applied to the level of patient enrollment and activity according to the protocol. If timelines or contracts are modified based upon changes in the clinical trial protocol or scope of work to be performed, we modify our estimates of accrued expenses accordingly on a prospective basis.
Our only commercial product is ILUVIEN, which has received marketing authorization in the United Kingdom, Austria, France, Germany, Portugal and Spain, and has been recommended for marketing authorization in Italy, for the treatment of vision impairment associated with chronic DME considered insufficiently responsive to available therapies. ILUVIEN has not been approved in the U.S. by the FDA or in any jurisdiction other than as set forth above. In order to grant marketing approval, a health authority such as the FDA or foreign regulatory agencies must conclude that clinical and preclinical data establish the safety and efficacy of ILUVIEN or any future products or product candidates with an appropriate benefit to risk profile relevant to a particular indication, and that the product can be manufactured under current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) in a reproducible manner to deliver the product’s intended performance in terms of its stability, quality, purity and potency. Until our submissions are reviewed by health authorities, there is no way to predict the outcome of their review. Even if the clinical studies meet their predetermined primary endpoints, and a registration dossier is accepted for filing, a health authority could still determine that an appropriate benefit to risk relationship does not exist for the indication that we are seeking. We cannot forecast with any degree of certainty which of ILUVIEN or any future products or product candidates will be subject to future collaborations or how such arrangements would affect our development plan or capital requirements. As a result of the uncertainties discussed above, we are unable to determine the duration and completion costs of our development projects or when and to what extent we will receive cash inflows from the commercialization and sale of an approved product candidate.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation for employees in executive and administrative functions, including finance, accounting, information technology and human resources. Other significant costs include facilities costs and professional fees for accounting and legal services, including legal services associated with obtaining and maintaining patents. We expect to continue to incur significant costs to comply with the corporate governance, internal control and similar requirements applicable to public companies.
Sales and Marketing Expenses
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of professional fees and compensation for employees for the assessment of the commercial opportunity of, the development of market awareness for, the pursuit of market reimbursement and the execution of launch plans for ILUVIEN. Other costs include professional fees associated with developing plans for ILUVIEN or any future products or product candidates and maintaining public relations.
We launched ILUVIEN in the United Kingdom and Germany in the second quarter of 2013, and currently plan to launch ILUVIEN in France in late 2014. We expect significant increases in our marketing and selling expenses as we continue the commercialization of ILUVIEN in these countries.
In November 2012, we entered into an agreement with Quintiles Commercial Europe Limited. Under the Agreement, Quintiles Commercial Europe Limited and its affiliates (collectively, Quintiles Commercial) will provide certain services to us in relation to the commercialization of ILUVIEN, in certain countries in Europe under subsequent project orders. Such services may include marketing, brand management, sales promotion and detailing, market access, pricing and reimbursement support, regulatory, medical science liaison and communications and/or other advisory services. As of March 31, 2014, we had entered into eight project orders with Quintiles Commercial for the provision of sales, marketing, management, market access and medical science personnel in Germany, the United Kingdom and France. Under these project orders Quintiles Commercial employed 23 persons fully dedicated to Alimera as of March 31, 2014. Quintiles Commercial also employed three persons partially dedicated to Alimera in Germany, the United Kingdom and France, and five persons partially dedicated to develop market access in the United Kingdom as of March 31, 2014. In accordance with the terms of these project orders, we expect to incur approximately $27.2 million in costs with Quintiles Commercial through 2015. During the three months ended March 31, 2014, we incurred $1.9 million of expense associated with this agreement. At March 31, 2014, $1.4 million is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in our accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements in association with these project orders.
We have a European management team providing strategic oversight and operational management to the personnel provided by Quintiles Commercial.
24
Interest Expense
Interest expense consists primarily of interest and amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discounts associated with our 2010 Term Loan and 2013 Term Loan.
Change in Fair Value of Derivative Warrant Liability
Warrants to purchase our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock or common stock that do not meet the requirements for classification as equity, in accordance with the Derivatives and Hedging Topic of the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification, are classified as liabilities. We record these derivative financial instruments as liabilities in our balance sheet measured at their fair value. We record the changes in fair value of such instruments as non-cash gains or losses in the consolidated statements of operations.
Basic and Diluted Net Loss Applicable to Common Stockholders per Common Share
We calculated net loss per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earning per Share. We had a net loss for all periods presented. Dilutive common stock equivalents would include the dilutive effect of convertible securities, common stock options, warrants for convertible securities and warrants for common stock equivalents. Potentially dilutive weighted average common stock equivalents totaled approximately 22,124,816 and 1,402,669 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Potentially dilutive common stock equivalents were excluded from the diluted earnings per share denominator for all periods of net loss because of their anti-dilutive effect. Therefore, for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, the weighted average shares used to calculate both basic and diluted loss per share are the same.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our interim condensed consolidated financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate these estimates and judgments, including those described below. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates and assumptions form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results and experiences may differ materially from these estimates. We believe that the following accounting policies are the most critical to aid you in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results and affect the more significant judgments and estimates that we use in the preparation of our interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
Clinical Trial Prepaid and Accrued Expenses
We record prepaid assets and accrued liabilities related to clinical trials associated with CROs, clinical trial investigators and other vendors based upon amounts paid and the estimated amount of work completed on each clinical trial. The financial terms of agreements vary from vendor to vendor and may result in uneven payment flows. As such, if we have advanced funds exceeding our estimate of the work completed, we record a prepaid asset. If our estimate of the work completed exceeds the amount paid, an accrued liability is recorded. All such costs are charged to research and development expenses based on these estimates. Our estimates may or may not match the actual services performed by the organizations as determined by patient enrollment levels and related activities. We monitor patient enrollment levels and related activities to the extent possible through internal reviews, correspondence and discussions with our CROs and review of contractual terms. However, if we have incomplete or inaccurate information, we may underestimate or overestimate activity levels associated with various clinical trials at a given point in time. In this event, we could record significant research and development expenses in future periods when the actual level of activities becomes known. To date, we have not experienced material changes in these estimates. Additionally, we do not expect material adjustments to research and development expenses to result from changes in the nature and level of clinical trial activity and related expenses that are currently subject to estimation. In the future, as we expand our clinical trial activities, we expect to have increased levels of research and development costs that will be subject to estimation.
Research and Development Costs
Research and development expenditures are expensed as incurred, pursuant to ASC 730, Research and Development. Costs to license technology to be used in our research and development that have not reached technological feasibility, defined as regulatory approval for ILUVIEN or any future products or product candidates, and have no alternative future use are expensed when incurred. Payments to licensors that relate to the achievement of preapproval development milestones are recorded as research and development expense when incurred.
25
Stock-Based Compensation
We have stock option plans which provide for grants of stock options to employees, directors and consultants or other service providers to purchase shares of our common stock at exercise prices generally equal to the fair values of such stock at the dates of grant. Compensation cost is recognized for all stock-based awards based on the grant date fair value in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation. We recognize the grant date fair value as compensation cost of employee stock-based awards using the straight-line method over the actual vesting period, adjusted for our estimates of forfeiture. Typically, we grant stock options with a requisite service period of four years from the grant date. We have elected to use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of stock-based awards.
We concluded that this was the most appropriate method by which to value our share-based payment arrangements, but if any share-based payment instruments should be granted for which the Black-Scholes method does not meet the measurement objective as stated within ASC 718, we will utilize a more appropriate method for valuing that instrument. However, we do not believe that any instruments granted to date and accounted for under ASC 718 would require a method other than the Black-Scholes method.
Our determination of the fair market value of share-based payment awards on the grant date using option valuation models requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected price volatility and option life. For the calculation of expected volatility, because we lack significant company-specific historical and implied volatility information, we estimate our volatility by utilizing an average of volatilities of publicly traded companies, including our own, deemed similar to us in terms of product composition, stage of lifecycle, capitalization and scope of operations. We intend to continue to consistently apply this process using this same index until a sufficient amount of historical information regarding the volatility of our own share price becomes available.
To estimate the expected term, we utilize the “simplified” method for “plain vanilla” options as discussed within the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Statement of Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 107. We believe that all factors listed within SAB 107 as pre-requisites for utilizing the simplified method are true for us and for our share-based payment arrangements. We intend to utilize the simplified method for the foreseeable future until more detailed information about exercise behavior will be more widely available.
Total stock-based compensation expense related to all our stock option awards for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, was comprised of the following:
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||
2014 | 2013 | ||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||
Sales and marketing | $ | 146 | $ | 100 | |||
Research and development | 255 | 94 | |||||
General and administrative | 524 | 335 | |||||
Total employee stock option-based compensation expense | $ | 925 | $ | 529 |
Income Taxes
We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of our assets and liabilities in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes. We evaluate the positive and negative evidence bearing upon the realizability of our deferred tax assets on an annual basis. Significant management judgment is involved in determining the provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities, and any valuation allowance recorded against net deferred tax assets. Due to uncertainties with respect to the realization of our deferred tax assets due to our history of operating losses, a valuation allowance has been established against our deferred tax asset balances to reduce the net carrying value to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized. As a result we have fully reserved against the deferred tax asset balances. The valuation allowances are based on our estimates of taxable income in the jurisdictions in which we operate and the period over which deferred tax assets will be recoverable. In the event that actual results differ from these estimates or we adjust these estimates in future periods, a change in the valuation allowance may be needed, which could materially impact our financial position and results of operations. Our deferred tax assets primarily consist of net operating loss (NOL) carry-forwards. If not utilized, the federal NOL carry-forwards will expire at various dates between 2023 and 2033 and the state NOL carry-forwards will expire at various dates between 2020 and 2033. We periodically evaluate our NOL carry-forwards and whether certain changes in ownership have occurred that would limit our ability to utilize a portion of our NOL carry-forwards. If it is determined that significant ownership changes have occurred since these NOLs were generated, we may be subject to annual limitations on the use of these NOLs under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 382 (or comparable provisions of state law). The issuance of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock on October 2, 2012 constituted such a change in ownership. As a
26
result of this change in ownership, we performed a formal analysis in connection with IRC Section 382 and determined that approximately $13.7 million of our NOLs generated prior to the change in ownership could not be utilized in the future. Our remaining NOLs remain subject to future limitation under IRC Section 382. Because our deferred tax assets were fully reserved, there was no impact on our financial statements.
In the event that we were to determine that we are able to realize any of our net deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the valuation allowance would increase net income in the period such determination was made. We believe that the most significant uncertainty that will impact the determination of our valuation allowance will be our estimation of the extent and timing of future net income, if any.
We considered our income tax positions for uncertainty in accordance with ASC 740. We believe our income tax filing positions and deductions are more likely than not of being sustained on audit and do not anticipate any adjustments that will result in a material change to our financial position; therefore, we have not recorded ASC 740 liabilities. We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as interest expense and income tax expense, respectively, in our statements of operations. Our tax years since 2003 remain subject to examination in Georgia, Tennessee, and on the federal level. We do not anticipate any material changes to our uncertain tax positions within the next 12 months.
Foreign Currency Translation
The U.S. dollar is the functional currency of Alimera Sciences, Inc. The Euro is the functional currency for the majority of our subsidiaries operating outside of the U.S.
Our foreign currency assets and liabilities are remeasured into U.S. dollars at end-of-period exchange rates, except for nonmonetary balance sheet accounts, which are remeasured at historical exchange rates. Revenue and expenses are remeasured at average exchange rates in effect during each period, except for those expenses related to the non-monetary balance sheet amounts, which are remeasured at historical exchange rates. Gains or losses from foreign currency remeasurement are included in income.
The financial statements of the foreign subsidiaries whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar have been translated into U.S. Dollars in accordance with ASC 830-30, Translation of Financial Statements. For the subsidiaries operating outside of the U.S. that are denominated in the Euro, assets and liabilities are translated at end-of-period rates while revenues and expenses are translated at average rates in effect during the period in which the activity took place. Equity is translated at historical rates and the resulting cumulative translation adjustments are included as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income.
27
Results of Operations
The following selected unaudited financial and operating data are derived from our financial statements and should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our interim condensed consolidated financial statements.
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||
2014 | 2013 | ||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||
NET REVENUE | $ | 2,084 | $ | — | |||
COST OF GOODS SOLD | (564 | ) | — | ||||
GROSS MARGIN | 1,520 | — | |||||
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES | 2,626 | 2,023 | |||||
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES | 2,927 | 2,670 | |||||
SALES AND MARKETING EXPENSES | 3,411 | 3,563 | |||||
OPERATING EXPENSES | 8,964 | 8,256 | |||||
INTEREST EXPENSE, NET AND OTHER | (129 | ) | (134 | ) | |||
UNREALIZED FOREIGN CURRENCY LOSS, NET | (56 | ) | — | ||||
CHANGE IN FAIR VALUE OF DERIVATIVE WARRANT LIABILITY | (13,130 | ) | (5,594 | ) | |||
NET LOSS | $ | (20,759 | ) | $ | (13,984 | ) |
Three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2013
Net Revenue. Net revenue of approximately $2.1 million was recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2014 in connection with the commercial launch of ILUVIEN in Germany and the United Kingdom in the second quarter of 2013. No revenue was recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2013.
Cost of goods sold. Cost of goods sold was approximately $560,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014. We initiated the commercial launch of ILUVIEN in Germany and the United Kingdom in the second quarter of 2013 and began recognizing cost of goods sold at that time.
Research and development expenses. Research and development expenses increased by approximately $600,000, or 30%, to approximately $2.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to approximately $2.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The increase was primarily attributable to increases of approximately $440,000 in costs associated with the submission of our response to the third CRL from the FDA in March 2014, $360,000 in personnel costs as we expanded our team after the commercial launch of ILUVIEN and $270,000 in costs associated with new clinical studies being performed in the EU including costs associated with a five-year, post-authorization, open label registry study of ILUVIEN. These costs were offset by decreases of $210,000 in costs related to our domestic ancillary clinical studies including the physician utilization study completed in the fourth quarter of 2013 and $150,000 in costs incurred related to a consultant engaged to assist with the continued pursuit of approval of ILUVIEN in the U.S.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased by approximately $200,000, or 10%, to approximately $2.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to approximately $2.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase of approximately $460,000 in personnel costs as we expanded our team after the commercial launch of ILUVIEN, offset by a decrease of $370,000 in professional and legal fees associated with the establishment of our infrastructure and tax planning for our expansion in Europe in the three months ended March 31, 2013, and the registration of common stock underlying our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock issued in October 2012 incurred in the three months ended March 31, 2013.
Sales and Marketing expenses. Sales and marketing expenses decreased by approximately $200,000, or 4%, to approximately $3.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to approximately $3.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The decrease was primarily attributable to non-recurring marketing and market access costs of approximately $530,000 in preparation for the commercial launch of ILUVIEN in the EU in the second quarter of 2013, offset by increases of $360,000 in costs associated with contracting with Quintiles Commercial for marketing, brand management,
28
sales promotion and detailing, market access, pricing and reimbursement support, and communications and/or other advisory services services in the EU.
Interest expense, net and other. Interest expense, net and other decreased by $5,000, or 4%, to $129,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 compared to $134,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2013. Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was incurred in connection with our 2013 Term Loan. Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was incurred in connection with our 2010 Term Loan. The decrease was primarily attributable to the lower interest rate on the 2013 Term Loan in comparison to the 2010 Term Loan.
Unrealized foreign currency loss, net. We recorded a non-cash unrealized foreign currency loss of $56,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014. The unrealized foreign currency loss was primarily attributable to the change in value of the Euro and the British pound sterling during the three months ended March 31, 2014.
Change in fair value of derivative warrant liability. An increase in the fair value of our derivative warrant liability resulted in non-cash expense of approximately $13.1 million and $5.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The increased value of the derivative warrant liability for both periods was primarily due to increases in the fair market value of our underlying common stock during the respective periods.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
To date we have incurred recurring losses, negative cash flow from operations, and have accumulated a deficit of $298.1 million from our inception through March 31, 2014.
As of March 31, 2014, we had approximately $41.3 million in cash and cash equivalents. In April 2014, we refinanced our 2013 Term Loan resulting in net proceeds of $4.7 million.
We launched ILUVIEN in the United Kingdom and Germany, in April and May of 2013, respectively, and currently plan to launch ILUVIEN in France in late 2014. We do not expect to have positive cash flow from operations until 2015, if at all. Due to the limited revenue generated by ILUVIEN to date, we may not be able to maintain compliance with covenants under our loan agreements. In an event of default, our lender may call the 2014 Term Loan, and we will likely need to raise additional financing. We may seek to fund our operations through the sale of equity securities, strategic collaboration agreements and debt financing. We cannot be sure that additional financing from any of these sources will be available or that, if available, the additional financing will be obtained on terms favorable to us or our stockholders especially in light of the current difficult financial environment. If we raise additional funds by issuing equity securities, substantial dilution to existing stockholders would likely result and the terms of any new equity securities may have a preference over our preferred or common stock. If we attempt to raise additional funds through strategic collaboration agreements and debt financing, we may not be successful in obtaining collaboration agreements, or in receiving milestone or royalty payments under those agreements, or the terms of the debt may involve significant cash payment obligations as well as covenants and specific financial ratios that may restrict our ability to commercialize ILUVIEN or any future products or product candidates or operate our business. If we are unable to obtain additional financing, we will need to adjust our commercial plans so that we can continue to operate with our existing cash resources or there may be substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
For the three months ended March 31, 2014, cash used in our operations of $6.2 million was primarily due to our net loss of $20.8 million, offset by non-cash expense of $13.1 million for the change in our derivative warrant liability and by $930,000 of non-cash stock-based compensation expense. Further decreasing cash from operations was an increase in accounts receivable of $780,000 and a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities of $480,000, offset by a decrease of $1.1 million in prepaid expenses and other current assets. Accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities decreased primarily due to decreases of $420,000 in amounts payable to Quintiles Commercial and $250,000 in amounts paid to the investigators of our domestic ancillary studies, offset by an increase of $310,000 in amounts due to our third party manufacturing sites incurred in connection with the response to the FDA submitted in March 2014. Prepaid expenses and other current assets decreased primarily due to an decrease of $1.1 million of amounts owed to us from Quintiles Commercial that were applied in lieu of payments for billings in the three months ended March 31, 2014.
For the three months ended March 31, 2013, cash used in our operations of $9.8 million was primarily due to our net loss of $14.0 million offset by a non-cash expense of $5.6 million for a change in derivative warrant liability and by non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $530,000. Further increasing our cash used in operations was a net decrease in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities of $1.1 million and an increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets of $610,000. Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities decreased primarily due to decreases of $1.4 million paid to Quintiles Commercial for marketing, brand management, sales promotion and detailing, market access, pricing and reimbursement support, regulatory, medical science liaison and communications and/or other advisory services in the EU and $250,000 paid to our third party reading center for additional analysis of photographs of the retina of patients of our FAME Study to be included in the response to the second CRL from the FDA. Prepaid expenses and other current assets
29
increased primarily due to $450,000 receivable from Quintiles Commercial for excess billings during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and $140,000 in prepaid marketing expense for meetings and conventions.
For the three months ended March 31, 2014, net cash used in our investing activities was $12,000, which was due to the purchase of property and equipment.
For the three months ended March 31, 2013, net cash used in our investing activities was $28,000, which was due to the purchases of property and equipment.
For the three months ended March 31, 2014, net cash provided by our financing activities was approximately $35.0 million. In January 2014, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with investors pursuant to which we sold an aggregate of 6,250,000 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $6.00 per share. Gross proceeds from the offering were $37.5 million prior to the payment of approximately $2.4 million of related issuance costs. Further increasing cash from our financing activities was $290,000 from proceeds from exercises of stock options, offset by $420,000 of principal payments on our 2013 Term Loan.
For the three months ended March 31, 2013, net cash used in our financing activities was $460,000, which was primarily due to principal payments on our notes payable to SVB and MidCap.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
In connection with our efforts to obtain the approval of ILUVIEN from the FDA, in February 2012, we engaged a consultant for services related to the continued pursuit of approval of ILUVIEN in the U.S. We recorded charges pertaining to consulting fees related to our agreement with this consultant of $300,000 and $450,000 during the three month periods ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. We expect to record an additional $150,000 in charges in connection with this agreement through September 30, 2014. In addition, we have agreed to pay the consultant $2.0 million, if, and only if, the FDA approves our NDA for ILUVIEN.
In November 2012, we entered into an agreement with Quintiles Commercial Europe Limited. Under the agreement, Quintiles Commercial Europe Limited and its affiliates (collectively, Quintiles Commercial) will provide certain services to us in connection with the commercialization of ILUVIEN in certain countries in Europe under subsequent project orders. Such services may include marketing, brand management, sales promotion and detailing, market access, pricing and reimbursement support, regulatory, medical science liaison and communications and/or other advisory services. Currently, we have entered into seven project orders with Quintiles Commercial for the provision of services in Germany, the United Kingdom and France. Under the existing project orders, we will incur approximately $27.2 million in costs with Quintiles Commercial through 2015. During the three months ended March 31, 2014, we recorded charges of $1.9 million in connection with this agreement. At March 31, 2014, $1.4 million is included in prepaid expenses and other current assets.
There have been no other material changes to our contractual obligations and commitments outside the ordinary course of business from those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed with the SEC on March 7, 2013.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, that would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements (as that term is defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K) or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As such, we are not exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in those types of relationships. We enter into guarantees in the ordinary course of business related to the guarantee of our own performance and the performance of our subsidiaries.
New Accounting Pronouncements
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, or other standard setting bodies that are adopted by us as of the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, we believe that the impact of recently issued standards that are not yet effective will not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations upon adoption.
In March 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (ASU) No. 2013-05: Parent's Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity (ASU 2013-05), which applies to the release of the cumulative translation adjustment resulting from certain events occurring in foreign subsidiaries. ASU 2013-05 is effective for fiscal years, and interim reporting
30
periods within those years, beginning on or after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2013-05 did not have a material impact on our interim financial statements.
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02: Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (ASU 2013-02), which adds new disclosure requirements for items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. ASU 2013-02 is effective for fiscal years, and interim reporting periods within those years, beginning on or after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2013-02 did not have a material impact on our interim financial statements.
31
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2014. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2014, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the three months ended March 31, 2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
32
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings
We are not a party to any material pending legal proceedings, and management is not aware of any contemplated proceedings by any governmental authority against us.
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
In our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, filed with the SEC on March 7, 2014, we identify under Item 1A of Part I important factors which could affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and future operations and could cause our actual results for future periods to differ materially from our anticipated results or other expectations, including those expressed in any forward-looking statements made in this Form 10-Q. There have been no material changes in our risk factors subsequent to the filing of our Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. However, the risks described in our Form 10-K are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties that we currently deem to be immaterial or not currently known to us, as well as other risks reported from time to time in our reports to the SEC, also could cause our actual results to differ materially from our anticipated results or other expectations.
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
During the three months ended March 31, 2014, we issued the following securities which were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and have not been included previously in a Current Report on Form 8-K. We did not employ any form of general solicitation or advertising in connection with the offer and sale of the securities described below. In addition, we believe the purchasers of the securities are “accredited investors” for the purpose of Rule 501 of the Securities Act. For these reasons, among others, the offer and sale of the following securities were made in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act or Regulation D promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act):
2014 Common Stock Private Placement
On January 31, 2014, we issued an aggregate of 6,250,000 shares of our common stock for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $37.5 million (Private Placement). The Private Placement was issued and sold pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement, dated January 27, 2014, between us and certain purchasers. The per share purchase price of a share of common stock was $6.00. Cowen and Company, LLC served as sole placement agent in the Private Placement.
Each purchaser represented that it was an accredited investor with access to information about us sufficient to evaluate the investment and that the common stock was being acquired without a view to distribution or resale in violation of the Securities Act. A Form D filing was made in accordance with the requirements of Regulation D. The recipients of securities in the Private Placement represented their intention to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a view to or for sale in connection with any distribution thereof and appropriate legends were affixed to the stock certificates issued in such transaction. In connection with the Private Placement, we agreed to file one or more registration statements registering for resale the shares of common stock sold in the Private Placement. On April 17, 2014, our registration statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-194382) was declared effective by the SEC in order to allow the purchase of shares in the Private Placement to resell their shares as selling stockholders.
Net Exercise of Warrant
During the three months ended March 31, 2014, we issued Silicon Valley Bank 18,092 shares of our Common Stock in a cashless exercise transaction of outstanding warrants to purchase 31,808 shares of Common Stock. We received no proceeds from the cashless exercise of such warrants.
ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. Other Information
None.
33
ITEM 6. Exhibits
Exhibit Number | Description | |
31.1 | Certification of the Principal Executive Officer, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2 | Certification of the Principal Financial Officer, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
101.INS+ | XBRL Instance Document. | |
101.SCH+ | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. | |
101.CAL+ | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. | |
101.DEF+ | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. | |
101.LAB+ | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Link Document. | |
101.PRE+ | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. | |
+ | Users of this data are advised pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T that this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections. |
The certification attached as Exhibit 32.1 that accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Alimera Sciences, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
34
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
ALIMERA SCIENCES, INC. | ||
May 8, 2014 | By: | /s/ C. Daniel Myers |
C. Daniel Myers | ||
Chief Executive Officer and President | ||
(Principal Executive Officer) | ||
May 8, 2014 | By: | /s/ Richard S. Eiswirth, Jr. |
Richard S. Eiswirth, Jr. | ||
Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer | ||
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
35
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Number | Description | |
31.1 | Certification of the Principal Executive Officer, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2 | Certification of the Principal Financial Officer, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1 | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
101.INS+ | XBRL Instance Document. | |
101.SCH+ | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document. | |
101.CAL+ | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document. | |
101.DEF+ | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document. | |
101.LAB+ | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Link Document. | |
101.PRE+ | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document. | |
+ | Users of this data are advised pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T that this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections. |
The certification attached as Exhibit 32.1 that accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Alimera Sciences, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
36