Annual Statements Open main menu

ALLEGHANY CORP /DE - Quarter Report: 2010 June (Form 10-Q)

e10vq
 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(MARK ONE)
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
     
  FOR QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2010
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM                      TO                     
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-9371
ALLEGHANY CORPORATION
EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER
DELAWARE
STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION
51-0283071
I.R.S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO.
7 TIMES SQUARE TOWER, 17TH FLOOR, NY, NY 10036
ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES, INCLUDING ZIP CODE
212-752-1356
REGISTRANT’S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE
NOT APPLICABLE
FORMER NAME, FORMER ADDRESS, AND FORMER FISCAL YEAR, IF CHANGED SINCE LAST REPORT
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT (1) HAS FILED ALL REPORTS REQUIRED TO BE FILED BY SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 DURING THE PRECEDING 12 MONTHS (OR FOR SUCH SHORTER PERIOD THAT THE REGISTRANT WAS REQUIRED TO FILE SUCH REPORTS), AND (2) HAS BEEN SUBJECT TO SUCH FILING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PAST 90 DAYS.
YES þ                                                                                    NO o
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT HAS SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY AND POSTED ON ITS CORPORATE WEB SITE, IF ANY, EVERY INTERACTIVE DATA FILE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED AND POSTED PURSUANT TO RULE 405 OF REGULATION S-T (SECTION 232.405 OF THIS CHAPTER) DURING THE PRECEDING 12 MONTHS (OR SUCH SHORTER PERIOD THAT THE REGISTRANT WAS REQUIRED TO SUBMIT AND POST SUCH FILES).
YES þ                                                                                   NO o
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT IS A LARGE ACCELERATED FILER, AN ACCELERATED FILER, OR A NON-ACCELERATED FILER. SEE DEFINITION OF ACCELERATED FILER AND LARGE ACCELERATED FILER IN RULE 12b-2 OF THE EXCHANGE ACT.
(CHECK ONE):
             
LARGE ACCELERATED FILER þ   ACCELERATED FILER o     NON-ACCELERATED FILER o      SMALLER REPORTING COMPANY o
    (DO NOT CHECK IF A SMALLER REPORTING COMPANY)          
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT IS A SHELL COMPANY (AS DEFINED IN RULE 12B-2 OF THE EXCHANGE ACT).
YES o                                                                                         NO þ
INDICATE THE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING OF EACH OF THE ISSUER’S CLASSES OF COMMON STOCK, AS OF THE LAST PRACTICABLE DATE.
8,833,790 SHARES AS OF AUGUST 3, 2010
 
 

 


 

Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
ALLEGHANY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
                 
    June 30,     December 31,  
    2010     2009  
    (in thousands, except  
    share amounts)  
    (unaudited)          
Assets
               
Investments
               
Available-for-sale securities at fair value:
               
Equity securities (cost: 2010 — $915,210 ; 2009 — $530,945)
  $ 863,209     $ 624,546  
Debt securities (amortized cost: 2010 — $2,765,354; 2009 — $3,235,595)
    2,860,614       3,289,013  
Short-term investments
    353,880       262,903  
 
           
 
    4,077,703       4,176,462  
 
           
Other invested assets
    237,266       238,227  
 
           
Total investments
    4,314,969       4,414,689  
 
           
Cash
    84,182       32,526  
Premium balances receivable
    183,101       145,992  
Reinsurance recoverables
    945,710       976,172  
Ceded unearned premium reserves
    168,032       160,713  
Deferred acquisition costs
    72,480       71,098  
Property and equipment at cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization
    20,128       20,097  
Goodwill and other intangibles, net of amortization
    143,989       145,667  
Current tax receivable
    18,542        
Net deferred tax assets
    147,511       124,266  
Other assets
    120,185       101,550  
 
           
 
  $ 6,218,829     $ 6,192,770  
 
           
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
               
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
  $ 2,418,932     $ 2,520,979  
Unearned premiums
    596,609       573,906  
Reinsurance payable
    68,203       51,795  
Current taxes payable
          3,827  
Other liabilities
    420,994       324,742  
 
           
Total liabilities
    3,504,738       3,475,249  
 
           
Common stock
(shares authorized: 2010 and 2009 — 22,000,000; issued and outstanding: 2010 — 9,118,086; 2009 — 9,300,734)
    9,118       9,118  
Contributed capital
    923,392       921,225  
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    32,114       94,045  
Treasury stock, at cost (2010 — 274,804 shares; 2009 — 258,013 shares)
    (76,705 )     (66,325 )
Retained earnings
    1,826,172       1,759,458  
 
           
Total stockholders’ equity
    2,714,091       2,717,521  
 
           
 
  $ 6,218,829     $ 6,192,770  
 
           
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

 


 

ALLEGHANY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Income
(unaudited)
                 
    Three Months Ended June 30,  
    2010     2009  
    (in thousands, except  
    per share amounts)  
Revenues
               
Net premiums earned
  $ 188,809     $ 204,530  
Net investment income
    32,694       24,524  
Net realized capital gains
    33,308       79,492  
Other than temporary impairment losses
    (5,703 )     (9,675 )
Other income
    1,501       571  
 
           
Total revenues
    250,609       299,442  
 
           
Costs and expenses
               
Loss and loss adjustment expenses
    83,027       143,917  
Commissions, brokerage and other underwriting expenses
    64,773       70,272  
Other operating expenses
    8,082       12,185  
Corporate administration
    6,324       7,230  
Interest expense
    216       169  
 
           
Total costs and expenses
    162,422       233,773  
 
           
Earnings before income taxes
    88,187       65,669  
Income taxes
    21,916       19,668  
 
           
Net earnings
  $ 66,271     $ 46,001  
 
           
Other comprehensive income
               
Change in unrealized gains (losses), net of deferred taxes
  $ (57,401 )   $ 84,111  
Less: reclassification for net realized capital gains and other than temporary impairment losses, net of taxes
    (17,943 )     (53,169 )
Other
    50       45  
 
           
Comprehensive income
  $ (9,023 )   $ 76,988  
 
           
Net earnings
  $ 66,271     $ 46,001  
Preferred dividends
          2,250  
 
           
Net earnings available to common stockholders
  $ 66,271     $ 43,751  
 
           
 
               
Basic earnings per share*
  $ 7.41     $ 5.01  
Diluted earnings per share*
  $ 7.39     $ 4.90  
 
*   Adjusted to reflect common stock dividend declared in February 2010.
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

2


 

ALLEGHANY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Income
(unaudited)
                 
    Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2010     2009  
    (in thousands, except  
    per share amounts)  
Revenues
               
Net premiums earned
  $ 383,509     $ 422,574  
Net investment income
    64,123       51,593  
Net realized capital gains
    59,775       139,974  
Other than temporary impairment losses
    (6,780 )     (75,801 )
Other income
    1,634       1,020  
 
           
Total revenues
    502,261       539,360  
 
           
Costs and expenses
               
Loss and loss adjustment expenses
    179,654       256,754  
Commissions, brokerage and other underwriting expenses
    131,129       137,722  
Other operating expenses
    16,933       21,398  
Corporate administration
    11,558       7,138  
Interest expense
    435       332  
 
           
Total costs and expenses
    339,709       423,344  
 
           
Earnings before income taxes
    162,552       116,016  
Income taxes
    38,112       25,441  
 
           
Net earnings
  $ 124,440     $ 90,575  
 
           
Other comprehensive income
               
Change in unrealized gains (losses), net of deferred taxes.
  $ (27,583 )   $ 43,394  
Less: reclassification for net realized capital gains and other than temporary impairment losses, net of taxes
    (34,447 )     (49,500 )
Other
    99       (11 )
 
           
Comprehensive income
  $ 62,509     $ 84,458  
 
           
Net earnings
  $ 124,440     $ 90,575  
Preferred dividends
          6,158  
 
           
Net earnings available to common stockholders
  $ 124,440     $ 84,417  
 
           
 
               
Basic earnings per share*
  $ 13.85     $ 9.73  
Diluted earnings per share*
  $ 13.77     $ 9.36  
 
*   Adjusted to reflect common stock dividend declared in February 2010.
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

3


 

ALLEGHANY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)
                 
    Six Months Ended June 30,  
    2010     2009  
    (in thousands)  
Cash flows from operating activities
               
Net earnings
  $ 124,440     $ 90,575  
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization
    18,045       16,347  
Net realized capital (gains) losses
    (59,775 )     (139,974 )
Other than temporary impairment losses
    6,780       75,801  
(Increase) decrease in other assets
    6,496     (9,124 )
(Increase) decrease in reinsurance receivable, net of reinsurance payable
    46,870       67,143  
(Increase) decrease in premium balances receivable
    (37,109 )     (56,715 )
(Increase) decrease in ceded unearned premium reserves
    (7,319 )     (13,191 )
(Increase) decrease in deferred acquisition costs
    (1,382 )     (2,512 )
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities and current taxes
    (28,996 )     (28,921 )
Increase (decrease) in unearned premiums
    22,703       58,621  
Increase (decrease) in losses and loss adjustment expenses
    (102,047 )     6,385  
 
           
Net adjustments
    (135,734 )     (26,140 )
 
           
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
    (11,294 )     64,435  
 
           
Cash flows from investing activities
               
Purchase of investments
    (1,050,830 )     (834,520 )
Sales of investments
    1,078,492       541,070  
Maturities of investments
    184,185       144,498  
Purchases of property and equipment
    (3,550 )     (3,049 )
Net change in short-term investments
    (90,934 )     298,557  
Acquisition of equity method investments
    (5,000 )     0  
Other, net
    9,759     6,519  
 
           
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
    122,122       153,075  
 
           
Cash flows from financing activities
               
Treasury stock acquisitions
    (59,817 )     (35,691 )
Convertible preferred stock acquisition
          (117,358 )
Convertible preferred stock dividends paid
          (7,456 )
Tax benefit on stock based compensation
    513       312  
Other, net
    132       (501 )
 
           
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
    (59,172 )     (160,694 )
 
           
 
               
Net cash increase (decrease) in cash
    51,656       56,816  
Cash at beginning of period
    32,526       18,125  
 
           
Cash at end of period
  $ 84,182     $ 74,941  
 
           
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
               
Cash paid during the period for:
               
Interest
  $     $ 1  
Income taxes paid (refunds received)
  $ 46,204     $ 25,906  
See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

4


 

ALLEGHANY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Principles of Financial Statement Presentation
     This report should be read in conjunction with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “2009 10-K”) and the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, of Alleghany Corporation (“Alleghany”).
     Alleghany, a Delaware corporation, is engaged in the property and casualty and surety insurance business through its wholly-owned subsidiary Alleghany Insurance Holdings LLC (“AIHL”). AIHL’s insurance business is conducted through its wholly-owned subsidiaries RSUI Group, Inc. (“RSUI”), Capitol Transamerica Corporation and Platte River Insurance Company (collectively “CATA”), and Pacific Compensation Corporation, formerly known as Employers Direct Corporation. Effective April 12, 2010, as part of a strategic repositioning effort, Employers Direct Corporation changed its name to Pacific Compensation Corporation (“PCC”), and the name of its insurance subsidiary from Employers Direct Insurance Company to Pacific Compensation Insurance Company (“PCIC”). AIHL Re LLC (“AIHL Re”), a captive reinsurance subsidiary of AIHL, has in the past provided reinsurance to Alleghany operating units and affiliates. In addition, Alleghany owns approximately 33 percent of the outstanding shares of common stock of Homesite Group Incorporated (“Homesite”), a national, full-service, mono-line provider of homeowners insurance, and approximately 38 percent of ORX Exploration, Inc. (“ORX”), a regional oil and gas exploration and production company. These investments are reflected in Alleghany’s financial statements in other invested assets. Alleghany also owns and manages properties in the Sacramento, California region through its subsidiary Alleghany Properties Holdings LLC (“Alleghany Properties”) and makes strategic investments in operating companies and conducts other activities at the parent level.
     The financial statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are unaudited, but reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary to a fair statement of results of the interim periods covered thereby. All adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature except as described herein.
     The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the results of Alleghany and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those reported results to the extent that those estimates and assumptions prove to be inaccurate.
     Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2010 presentation.

5


 

2. Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
     In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance that establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “ASC”) as the single source of authoritative accounting principles in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP. The ASC is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. Alleghany adopted the ASC in the 2009 third quarter, and the implementation did not have any impact on its results of operations and financial condition.
     In September 2009, FASB issued guidance that allows investors to use net asset value as a practical expedient to estimate the fair value of investments in investment companies (and like entities) that do not have readily determinable fair values. This guidance does not apply to investments accounted for using the equity method. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009, with early application permitted. Alleghany adopted this guidance in the fourth quarter of 2009, and the implementation did not have any impact on its results of operations and financial condition. Alleghany’s partnership investments that are accounted for as available-for-sale are subject to this guidance. Net asset value quotes from the third-party general partner of the entity in which such investments are held, which will often be based on unobservable market inputs, constitute the primary input in Alleghany’s determination of the fair value of such investments. The fair value of Alleghany’s available-for-sale partnership investments was $24.0 million at June 30, 2010 and $35.2 million at December 31, 2009.
     In June 2009, FASB issued guidance that changes the way entities account for securitizations and special-purpose entities. This guidance eliminates the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity,” changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and requires additional disclosure about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions and an entity’s continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. This guidance also changes how a company determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting rights (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entity’s purpose and design and a company’s ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. This guidance is generally effective for interim and annual periods beginning in 2010. Alleghany adopted this guidance in the 2010 first quarter, and the implementation did not have any impact on its results of operations and financial condition. Alleghany did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements outstanding at June 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009, including those that may involve the types of entities contemplated in this guidance.
     In January 2010, FASB issued guidance that provides for additional financial statement disclosure regarding fair value measurements, including how fair values are measured. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. Alleghany adopted this guidance in the 2010 first quarter, and the implementation did not have any impact on its results of operations and financial condition.
3. Earnings Per Share of Common Stock
     The following is a reconciliation of the income and share data used in the basic and diluted earnings

6


 

per share computations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (in millions, except share amounts):
                                 
    Three months ended June 30,     Six months ended June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Net earnings
  $ 66.3     $ 46.0     $ 124.4     $ 90.6  
Preferred dividends
          2.2             6.2  
 
                       
Income available to common stockholders for basic earnings per share
    66.3       43.8       124.4       84.4  
Preferred dividends
          2.2             6.2  
Effect of other dilutive securities
    (0.1 )           (0.5 )     (1.1 )
 
                       
Income available to common stockholders for diluted earnings per share
  $ 66.2     $ 46.0     $ 123.9     $ 89.5  
 
                       
Weighted average shares outstanding applicable to basic earnings per share
    8,945,281       8,728,049       8,984,748       8,676,332  
Preferred stock
          664,503             877,447  
Effect of other dilutive securities
    9,596             9,303       5,073  
 
                       
Adjusted weighted average shares outstanding applicable to diluted earnings per share
    8,954,877       9,392,552       8,994,051       9,558,852  
 
                       
     Contingently issuable shares of 39,957 and 34,753 were potentially available during the first six months of 2010 and 2009, respectively, but were not included in the computations of diluted earnings per share because the impact was anti-dilutive to the earnings per share calculation.
     Earnings per share by quarter may not equal the amount for the full year due to rounding.
4. Commitments and Contingencies
     (a) Leases
     Alleghany leases certain facilities, furniture and equipment under long-term lease agreements.
     (b) Litigation
     Alleghany’s subsidiaries are parties to pending litigation and claims in connection with the ordinary course of their businesses. Each such subsidiary makes provisions for estimated losses to be incurred in such litigation and claims, including legal costs. In the opinion of management, such provisions were adequate at June 30, 2010.
     (c) Asbestos and Environmental Impairment Exposure
     AIHL’s reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses include $14.4 million of gross reserves and $14.3 million of net reserves at June 30, 2010, and $18.9 million of gross reserves and $18.8 million of net reserves at December 31, 2009, for various liability coverages related to asbestos and environmental impairment claims that arose from reinsurance assumed by a subsidiary of CATA between 1969 and 1976. This subsidiary exited such business in 1976. CATA released $3.5 million of such net reserves at June 30, 2010 based on a reserve study that was completed in the 2010 second quarter. Although Alleghany is unable at this time to determine whether additional reserves, which could have a material impact upon its results of operations, may be necessary in the future, Alleghany believes

7


 

that CATA’s asbestos and environmental reserves were adequate at June 30, 2010. Additional information concerning CATA’s asbestos and environmental exposure can be found in Note 13 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Item 8 of the 2009 10-K.
     (d) Indemnification Obligations
     On July 14, 2005, Alleghany completed the sale of its world-wide industrial minerals business, World Minerals, Inc. (“World Minerals”), to Imerys USA, Inc. (the “Purchaser”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Imerys, S.A., pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 19, 2005, by and among the Purchaser, Imerys, S.A. and Alleghany (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”). Pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, Alleghany undertook certain indemnification obligations, including a general indemnification for breaches of representations and warranties set forth in the Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Contract Indemnification”) and a special indemnification (the “Products Liability Indemnification”) related to products liability claims arising from events that occurred during pre-closing periods, including the period of Alleghany ownership (the “Alleghany Period”).
     The Products Liability Indemnification is divided into two parts, the first relating to products liability claims arising in respect of events occurring during the period prior to Alleghany’s acquisition of the World Minerals business from Johns Manville Corporation, Inc., formerly known as Manville Sales Corporation (“Manville”), in July 1991 (the “Manville Period”), and the second relating to products liability claims arising in respect of events occurring during the period of Alleghany ownership (the “Alleghany Period”).
     Under the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, Alleghany will provide indemnification at a rate of 100 percent for the first $100.0 million of losses arising from products liability claims relating to the Manville Period and at a rate of 50 percent for the next $100.0 million of such losses, so that Alleghany’s maximum indemnification obligation in respect of products liability claims relating to the Manville Period is $150.0 million. This indemnification obligation in respect of Manville Period products liability claims will expire on July 31, 2016. The Stock Purchase Agreement states that it is the intention of the parties that, with regard to losses incurred in respect of products liability claims relating to the Manville Period, recovery should first be sought from Manville, and that Alleghany’s indemnification obligation in respect of products liability claims relating to the Manville Period is intended to indemnify the Purchaser for such losses which are not recovered from Manville within a reasonable period of time after recovery is sought from Manville. In connection with World Minerals’ acquisition of the assets of the industrial minerals business of Manville in 1991, Manville agreed to indemnify World Minerals for certain product liability claims, in respect of products of the industrial minerals business manufactured during the Manville Period, asserted against World Minerals through July 31, 2006. In June 2006, Manville agreed to extend its indemnification for such claims asserted against World Minerals through July 31, 2009. Notwithstanding the expiration of the Manville indemnity, World Minerals did not, as part of its 1991 acquisition of the assets of Manville’s industrial minerals business assets, assume liability for product liability claims to the extent that such claims relate, in whole or in part, to the Manville Period, and Manville should continue to be responsible for such claims.
     With respect to the Contract Indemnification, substantially all of the representations and warranties to which the Contract Indemnification applies survived until July 14, 2007, with the exception of certain representations and warranties such as those related to environmental, real estate and tax matters, which

8


 

survive for longer periods and generally, except for tax and certain other matters, apply only to aggregate losses in excess of $2.5 million, up to a maximum of approximately $123.0 million. The Stock Purchase Agreement provides that Alleghany has no responsibility for products liability claims arising in respect of events occurring after the closing, and that any products liability claims involving both pre-closing and post-closing periods will be apportioned on an equitable basis.
     Additional information concerning the Contract Indemnification and Products Liability Indemnification can be found in Note 13 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Item 8 of the 2009 10-K.
     Based on Alleghany’s historical experience and other analyses, in July 2005, Alleghany established a $0.6 million reserve in connection with the Products Liability Indemnification for the Alleghany Period. Such reserve was approximately $0.3 million at both June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
     (e) Equity Holdings Concentration
     At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, Alleghany had a concentration of market risk in its available-for-sale equity securities portfolio with respect to certain energy sector businesses of $560.4 million and $399.2 million, respectively. Of the $560.4 million, $342.4 million represented Alleghany’s ownership of common stock of Exxon Mobil Corporation.
5. Segments of Business
     Information related to Alleghany’s reportable segment is shown in the table below. Property and casualty and surety insurance operations are conducted by AIHL through its insurance operating units RSUI, CATA and PCC. In addition, AIHL Re is a wholly-owned subsidiary of AIHL that has in the past provided reinsurance to Alleghany’s insurance operating units and affiliates.
     Alleghany’s reportable segment is reported in a manner consistent with the way management evaluates the businesses. As such, insurance underwriting activities are evaluated separately from investment activities. Net realized capital gains and other-than-temporary impairment losses are not considered relevant in evaluating investment performance on an annual basis. Segment accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Item 8 of the 2009 10-K.
     The primary components of “corporate activities” are Alleghany Properties, Alleghany’s investments in Homesite and ORX, and strategic investments and other activities at the parent level.

9


 

                                 
    Three months ended June 30,     Six months ended June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Revenues:
                               
AIHL insurance group:
                               
Net premiums earned
                               
RSUI
  $ 146.3     $ 159.2     $ 296.6     $ 319.9  
CATA
    41.5       41.2       82.1       83.2  
PCC
    1.0       4.1       4.9       19.5  
AIHL Re
                       
 
                       
 
    188.8       204.5       383.6       422.6  
 
                       
Net investment income
    33.0       27.7       66.3       54.7  
Net realized capital gains
    32.7       19.0       55.5       26.5  
Other than temporary impairment losses (1)
    (5.7 )     (9.7 )     (6.8 )     (75.8 )
Other income
    0.2       0.4       0.3       0.9  
 
                       
Total insurance group
    249.0       241.9       498.9       428.9  
 
                       
 
                               
Corporate activities:
                               
Net investment income (2)
    (0.3 )     (3.0 )     (2.2 )     (3.1 )
Net realized capital gains (3)
    0.6       60.5       4.3       113.5  
Other than temporary impairment losses
                       
Other income
    1.3       0.1       1.3       0.1  
 
                       
Total
  $ 250.6     $ 299.5     $ 502.3     $ 539.4  
 
                       
Earnings before income taxes:
                               
AIHL insurance group:
                               
Underwriting profit (loss) (4)
                               
RSUI
  $ 43.8     $ 40.8     $ 80.6     $ 83.0  
CATA
    2.7       3.7       3.0       5.9  
PCC
    (5.5 )     (54.1 )     (10.9 )     (60.7 )
AIHL Re
                       
 
                       
 
    41.0       (9.6 )     72.7       28.2  
 
                       
Net investment income
    33.0       27.7       66.3       54.7  
Net realized capital gains
    32.7       19.0       55.5       26.5  
Other than temporary impairment losses (1)
    (5.7 )     (9.7 )     (6.8 )     (75.8 )
Other income, less other expenses
    (7.5 )     (11.4 )     (15.9 )     (19.8 )
 
                       
Total insurance group
    93.5       16.0       171.8       13.8  
 
                       
 
                               
Corporate activities:
                               
Net investment income (2)
    (0.3 )     (3.0 )     (2.2 )     (3.1 )
Net realized capital gains (3)
    0.6       60.5       4.3       113.5  
Other than temporary impairment losses
                       
Other income
    1.3       0.1       1.3       0.1  
Corporate administration and other expenses
    6.8       7.7       12.5       8.0  
Interest expense
    0.1       0.2       0.1       0.3  
 
                       
Total
  $ 88.2     $ 65.7     $ 162.6     $ 116.0  
 
                       
 
(1)   Reflects impairment charges for unrealized losses related to AIHL’s investment portfolio that were deemed to be other-than temporary. See Note 7.
 
(2)   Includes $1.6 million and $2.2 million of Alleghany’s equity in losses of Homesite, net of purchase accounting adjustments, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Also includes $2.8 million and $5.2 million of Alleghany’s equity in losses of ORX, net of purchase accounting adjustments, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
 
(3)   With respect to the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, primarily reflects net realized capital gains from the sale of shares of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation common stock.
 
(4)   Represents net premiums earned less loss and loss adjustment expenses and commission, brokerage and other underwriting expenses, all as determined in accordance with GAAP, and does not include net investment income, net realized capital gains, other-than-temporary impairment losses, other income or

10


 

    other expenses. Commission, brokerage and other underwriting expenses represent commission and brokerage expenses and that portion of salaries, administration and other operating expenses attributable primarily to underwriting activities, whereas the remainder constitutes other expenses.
6. Reinsurance
     As discussed in the 2009 10-K, RSUI reinsures its property lines of business through a program consisting of surplus share treaties, facultative placements, per risk, and catastrophe excess of loss treaties. RSUI’s catastrophe reinsurance program (which covers catastrophe risks including, among others, windstorms and earthquakes) and per risk reinsurance program run on an annual basis from May 1 to the following April 30 and thus expired on April 30, 2010. RSUI placed all of its catastrophe reinsurance program for the 2010-2011 period, and the new program is substantially similar to the expired program. The new reinsurance program provides coverage in two layers for $400.0 million of losses in excess of a $100.0 million net retention after application of the surplus share treaties, facultative reinsurance and per risk covers. The first layer provides coverage for $100.0 million of losses, before a 33 percent co-participation by RSUI, in excess of the $100.0 million net retention, and the second layer provides coverage for $300.0 million of losses, before a 5 percent co-participation by RSUI, in excess of $200.0 million. In addition, RSUI’s property per risk reinsurance program for the 2010-2011 period provides RSUI with coverage for $90.0 million of losses, before a 10 percent co-participation by RSUI (compared with no RSUI co-participation under the expired program), in excess of a $10.0 million net retention per risk after application of the surplus share treaties and facultative reinsurance.
     As discussed in Note 5(d) to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Item 8 of the 2009 10-K, RSUI reinsures its other lines of business through quota share treaties, except for professional liability and binding authority lines where RSUI retains all of such business. RSUI’s quota share reinsurance treaty for umbrella/excess renewed on June 1, 2010 on the same terms as the expiring treaty, providing coverage for policies with limits up to $30.0 million, with RSUI ceding 35 percent of the premium and loss for policies with limits up to $15.0 million and ceding 67.5 percent of the premium and loss for policies with limits in excess of $15.0 million up to $30.0 million. RSUI’s directors and officers liability line quota share reinsurance treaty renewed on July 1, 2010 on the same terms as the expiring treaty, providing coverage for policies with limits up to $20.0 million, with RSUI ceding 35 percent of the premium and loss for policies with limits up to $10.0 million and ceding 60 percent of the premium and loss for policies with limits in excess of $10.0 million up to $20.0 million.
7. Investments
     (a) Fair Value
     The estimated carrying values and fair values of Alleghany’s consolidated financial instruments as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as follows (in millions):
                                 
    June 30, 2010   December 31, 2009
    Carrying   Fair   Carrying   Fair
    Amount   Value   Amount   Value
Assets
                               
Investments (excluding equity method investments and loans)*
  $ 4,101.7     $ 4,101.7     $ 4,211.6     $ 4,211.6  
 
*   This table includes available-for-sale investments (securities as well as partnership investments carried at fair value that are included in other invested assets). This table excludes investments accounted for using the equity

11


 

    method (Homesite, ORX and other partnership investments) as well as certain loans receivable that are carried at cost, all of which are included in other invested assets. The fair value of short-term investments approximates amortized cost. The fair value of all other categories of investments is discussed below.
     GAAP defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value measurements are not adjusted for transaction costs. In addition, GAAP has a three-tiered hierarchy for inputs used in management’s determination of fair value of financial instruments that emphasizes the use of observable inputs over the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity. Unobservable inputs are the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions based on the best information available under the circumstances. In assessing the appropriateness of using observable inputs in making its fair value determinations, Alleghany considers whether the market for a particular security is “active” or not based on all the relevant facts and circumstances. For example, Alleghany may consider a market to be inactive if there are relatively few recent transactions or if there is a significant decrease in market volume. Furthermore, Alleghany considers whether observable transactions are “orderly” or not. Alleghany does not consider a transaction to be orderly if there is evidence of a forced liquidation or other distressed condition, and as such, little or no weight is given to that transaction as an indicator of fair value.
     The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:
    “Level 1” — Valuations are based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical, unrestricted assets. Since valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily and regularly available in an active market, valuation of these assets does not involve any meaningful degree of judgment. An active market is defined as a market where transactions for the financial instrument occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. Alleghany’s Level 1 assets generally include publicly traded common stocks and debt securities issued directly by the U.S. Government, where Alleghany’s valuations are based on quoted market prices.
 
    “Level 2” — Valuations are based on quoted market prices where such markets are not deemed to be sufficiently “active.” In such circumstances, additional valuation metrics will be used which involve direct or indirect observable market inputs. Alleghany’s Level 2 assets generally include preferred stocks and debt securities other than debt issued directly by the U.S. Government. Substantially all of the determinations of value in this category are based on a single quote from third-party dealers and pricing services. As Alleghany generally does not make any adjustments thereto, such quote typically constitutes the sole input in Alleghany’s determination of the fair value of these types of securities. In developing a quote, such third parties will use the terms of the security and market-based inputs. Terms of the security include coupon, maturity date, and any special provisions that may, for example, enable the investor, at its election, to redeem the security prior to its scheduled maturity date. Market-based inputs include the level of interest rates applicable to comparable securities in the market place and current credit rating(s) of the security. Such quotes are generally non-binding.
 
    “Level 3” — Valuations are based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. Valuation under Level 3 generally involves a significant degree of judgment on

12


 

      the part of Alleghany. Alleghany’s Level 3 assets are primarily limited to partnership investments. Net asset value quotes from the third-party general partner of the entity in which such investments are held, which will often be based on unobservable market inputs, constitute the primary input in Alleghany’s determination of the fair value of such assets.
     Alleghany validates the reasonableness of its fair value determinations for Level 2 securities by testing the methodology of the relevant third-party dealer or pricing service that provides the quotes upon which the fair value determinations are made. Alleghany tests the methodology by comparing such quotes with prices from executed market trades when such trades occur. Alleghany discusses with the relevant third-party dealer or pricing service any identified material discrepancy between the quote derived from its methodology and the executed market trade in order to resolve the discrepancy. Alleghany uses the quote from the third-party dealer or pricing service unless Alleghany determines that the methodology used to produce such quote is not in compliance with GAAP. In addition to such procedures, Alleghany also compares the aggregate amount of the fair value for such Level 2 securities with the aggregate fair value provided by a third-party financial institution. Furthermore, Alleghany reviews the reasonableness of its classification of securities within the three-tiered hierarchy to ensure that the classification is consistent with GAAP.
     The estimated carrying values of Alleghany’s financial instruments as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 allocated among the three levels set forth above were as follows (in millions):
                                 
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3 (1)     Total  
As of June 30, 2010
                               
Equity securities:
                               
Common stock
  $ 863.2     $     $     $ 863.2  
Preferred stock
                       
Debt securities:
                               
U.S. Government obligations
    249.2                   249.2  
Mortgage and asset-backed securities (2)
          985.9               985.9  
States, municipalities and political subdivisions bonds
          1,136.0             1,136.0  
Foreign bonds
          104.7             104.7  
Corporate bonds and other
          384.8             384.8  
 
                       
 
    249.2       2,611.4             2,860.6  
 
                       
Short-term investments
    195.8       158.1             353.9  
Other invested assets
                24.0       24.0  
 
                       
Investments (excluding equity method investments)
  $ 1,308.2     $ 2,769.5     $ 24.0     $ 4,101.7  
 
                       
As of December 31, 2009
                               
Equity securities:
                               
Common stock
  $ 624.5     $     $     $ 624.5  
Preferred stock
                       
Debt securities:
                               
U.S. Government obligations
    638.4                   638.4  
Mortgage and asset-backed securities (2)
          958.8             958.8  
States, municipalities and political subdivisions bonds
          1,234.0             1,234.0  
Foreign bonds
          144.3             144.3  
Corporate bonds and other
          313.5             313.5  
 
                       
 
    638.4       2,650.6             3,289.0  
 
                       
Short-term investments
    75.2       187.7             262.9  
Other invested assets
                35.2       35.2  
 
                       
Investments (excluding equity method investments)
  $ 1,338.1     $ 2,838.3     $ 35.2     $ 4,211.6  
 
                       
 
(1)   Level 3 securities consist of partnership investments and certain debt securities. The carrying value of partnership investments of $24.0 million decreased by $11.2 million from the December 31, 2009 carrying value of $35.2 million, due primarily to sales of $13.9 million (which generated a realized capital gain of

13


 

    $5.1 million), partially offset by an increase in estimated fair value during the period of $2.7 million.
 
(2)    Consists primarily of residential mortgage-backed securities.
     (b) Available-For-Sale Securities
     Available-for-sale securities at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are summarized as follows (in millions):
                                 
    Amortized     Gross     Gross        
    Cost     Unrealized     Unrealized     Fair  
    or Cost     Gains     Losses     Value  
June 30, 2010
                               
Consolidated
                               
Equity securities:
                               
Common stock
  $ 915.2     $ 42.7     $ (94.7 )   $ 863.2  
Preferred stock
                       
Debt securities:
                               
U.S. Government obligations
    244.1       5.1             249.2  
Mortgage and asset-backed securities*
    952.5       38.7       (5.3 )     985.9  
States, municipalities and political subdivisions bonds
    1,094.6       42.2       (0.8 )     1,136.0  
Foreign bonds
    105.2       3.3       (3.8 )     104.7  
Corporate bonds and other
    368.9       16.1       (0.2 )     384.8  
 
                       
 
    2,765.3       105.4       (10.1 )     2,860.6  
 
                       
Short-term investments
    353.9                   353.9  
 
                       
 
  $ 4,034.4     $ 148.1     $ (104.8 )   $ 4,077.7  
 
                       
 
                               
Industry Segment
                               
AIHL insurance group
  $ 3,964.1     $ 146.9     $ (104.8 )   $ 4,006.2  
Corporate activities
    70.3       1.2             71.5  
 
                       
 
  $ 4,034.4     $ 148.1     $ (104.8 )   $ 4,077.7  
 
                       
 
                               
December 31, 2009
                               
Consolidated
                               
Equity securities:
                               
Common stock
  $ 530.9     $ 99.4     $ (5.8 )   $ 624.5  
Preferred stock
                       
Debt securities:
                               
U.S. Government obligations
    634.8       5.1       (1.5 )     638.4  
Mortgage and asset-backed securities*
    955.8       16.5       (13.5 )     958.8  
States, municipalities and political subdivisions bonds
    1,202.2       35.0       (3.2 )     1,234.0  
Foreign bonds
    137.8       6.5             144.3  
Corporate bonds and other
    305.0       8.9       (0.4 )     313.5  
 
                       
 
    3,235.6       72.0       (18.6 )     3,289.0  
 
                       
Short-term investments
    262.9                   262.9  
 
                       
 
  $ 4,029.4     $ 171.4     $ (24.4 )   $ 4,176.4  
 
                       
Industry Segment
                               
AIHL insurance group
  $ 3,744.7     $ 167.0     $ (23.3 )   $ 3,888.4  
Corporate activities
    284.7       4.4       (1.1 )     288.0  
 
                       
 
  $ 4,029.4     $ 171.4     $ (24.4 )   $ 4,176.4  
 
                       
 
*   Consists primarily of residential mortgage-backed securities.
     The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities at June 30, 2010 by contractual maturity are shown below (in millions). Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

14


 

                 
    Amortized     Fair  
    Cost     Value  
Short-term investments due in one year or less
  $ 353.9     $ 353.9  
 
           
Mortgage and asset-backed securities
    952.5       985.9  
 
           
Debt securities
               
One year or less
    157.3       159.8  
Over one through five years
    784.9       808.6  
Over five through ten years
    397.8       419.0  
Over ten years
    472.8       487.3  
 
           
Equity securities
    915.2       863.2  
 
           
 
  $ 4,034.4     $ 4,077.7  
 
           
     The proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities were $1,078.5 million and $541.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The amounts of gross realized capital gains and gross realized capital losses of available-for-sale securities for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 were:
                 
    Six Months  
    Ended June 30,  
    2010     2009  
    (in millions)  
Gross realized gains
  $ 64.1     $ 157.2  
Gross realized losses
    (4.3 )     (17.2 )
 
           
Net realized gains
  $ 59.8     $ 140.0  
 
           
     The gross loss amounts exclude other-than-temporary impairment losses discussed below, but include $11.2 million of other impairment losses incurred by PCC in the 2009 second quarter (see Note 4(a) to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Item 8 of the 2009 10-K). Realized gains and losses on investments are determined in accordance with the specific identification method.
     (c) Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Losses
     Alleghany holds its equity and debt securities as available for sale, and as such, these securities are recorded at fair value. Alleghany continually monitors the difference between cost and the estimated fair value of its investments, which involves uncertainty as to whether declines in value are temporary in nature. If Alleghany believes a decline in the value of a particular investment is temporary, Alleghany records the decline as an unrealized loss in stockholders’ equity. If the decline is deemed to be other-than-temporary, Alleghany writes it down to the carrying value of the investment and records an other-than-temporary impairment loss on its statement of earnings. In addition, under GAAP, any portion of such decline that relates to debt securities that is believed to arise from factors other than credit is to be recorded as a component of other comprehensive income.
     Management’s assessment of a decline in value includes, among other things: (i) the duration of time and the relative magnitude to which fair value of the investment has been below cost; (ii) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer of the investment; (iii) extraordinary events, including negative news releases and rating agency downgrades, with respect to the issuer of the investment; (iv) Alleghany’s ability and intent to hold an equity security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery; and (v) whether it is more likely than not that Alleghany will sell a debt security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. A debt security is deemed impaired if it is probable

15


 

that Alleghany will not be able to collect all amounts due under the security’s contractual terms. An equity security is deemed impaired if, among other things, its decline in estimated fair value has existed for twelve months or more or if its decline in estimated fair value from its cost is greater than 50 percent, absent compelling evidence to the contrary. Further, for securities expected to be sold, an other-than-temporary impairment loss is recognized if Alleghany does not expect the fair value of a security to recover its cost prior to the expected date of sale. If that judgment changes in the future, Alleghany may ultimately record a realized loss after having originally concluded that the decline in value was temporary. Risks and uncertainties are inherent in the methodology Alleghany uses to assess other-than-temporary declines in value. Risks and uncertainties could include, but are not limited to, incorrect assumptions about financial condition, liquidity or future prospects, inadequacy of any underlying collateral, and unfavorable changes in economic or social conditions, interest rates or credit ratings.
     Other-than-temporary impairment losses for the six months ended June 30, 2010 reflect $6.8 million of unrealized losses that were deemed to be other-than temporary and, as such, are required to be charged against earnings. Of the $6.8 million, $6.5 million related to equity holdings (primarily in the energy sector), and $0.3 million related to debt security holdings (all of which were deemed to be credit-related). Of the $6.8 million of impairment losses, $5.7 million was incurred in the second quarter of 2010. The determination that unrealized losses on such securities were other-than-temporary was primarily based on the severity and duration of the declines in fair value of such securities relative to their cost as of the balance sheet date. Other-than-temporary impairment losses for the first six months of 2009 reflect $75.8 million of unrealized losses that were deemed to be other-than-temporary and, as such, are required to be charged against earnings. Of the $75.8 million, $47.6 million related to equity holdings in the energy sector, $16.4 million related to equity holdings in various other sectors, and $11.8 million related to debt security holdings (all of which were deemed to be credit-related). Of the $75.8 million of impairment losses, $9.7 million was incurred in the second quarter of 2009. Such severe declines primarily related to a significant deterioration of U.S. equity and, to a lesser extent, residential housing market conditions during the latter part of 2008 and extending through the first quarter of 2009, which abated somewhat in the 2009 second quarter.
     After adjusting the cost basis of securities for the recognition of unrealized losses through other-than-temporary impairment losses, the gross unrealized investment losses and related fair value of debt securities and equity securities at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as follows (in millions):

16


 

                                 
    As of June 30, 2010     As of December 31, 2009  
            Gross             Gross  
    Fair     Unrealized     Fair     Unrealized  
    Value     Losses     Value     Losses  
Debt securities
                               
U.S. Government obligations
                               
Less than 12 months
  $ 40.1     $     $ 225.5     $ 1.5  
More than 12 months
                       
Mortgage and asset-backed securities
                               
Less than 12 months
    26.5       0.1       18.6       0.7  
More than 12 months
    67.4       5.2       149.2       12.8  
States, municipalities and political subdivisions bonds
                               
Less than 12 months
    54.9       0.3       98.1       2.5  
More than 12 months
    11.9       0.5       16.1       0.7  
Foreign bonds
                               
Less than 12 months
    20.8       3.8       1.0        
More than 12 months
                       
Corporate bonds and other
                               
Less than 12 months
    18.2       0.2       50.7       0.4  
More than 12 months
                1.8        
 
                       
Total debt securities
                               
Less than 12 months
    160.5       4.4       393.9       5.1  
More than 12 months
    79.3       5.7       167.1       13.5  
 
                       
Equity securities — Common Stock
                               
Less than 12 months
    596.4       94.7       105.0       5.8  
More than 12 months
                       
Equity securities — Preferred Stock
                               
Less than 12 months
                       
More than 12 months
                       
 
                       
Total temporarily impaired securities
                               
Less than 12 months
    756.9       99.1       498.9       10.9  
More than 12 months
    79.3       5.7       167.1       13.5  
 
                       
Total
  $ 836.2     $ 104.8     $ 666.0     $ 24.4  
 
                       
     As of June 30, 2010, Alleghany held a total of 106 debt and equity investments that were in an unrealized loss position, of which 30 investments, all related to debt securities, were in an unrealized loss position continuously for 12 months or more. Of the debt investments that were in an unrealized loss position, all relate to mortgage and asset-backed securities, and states, municipalities and political subdivisions bonds. At June 30, 2010, virtually all of Alleghany’s debt securities were rated investment grade.
     At June 30, 2010, non-income producing invested assets were insignificant.
8. Income Taxes
     As of June 30, 2010, Alleghany believes there were no material uncertain tax positions that would require disclosure under GAAP.
     The effective tax rate on earnings before income taxes was 23.4 percent for the first six months of 2010, compared with 21.9 percent for the corresponding 2009 period. The higher effective tax rate in 2010 primarily reflects the lesser impact of tax-exempt income on Alleghany’s increased earnings in the 2010 period, partially offset by Alleghany’s recognition of a permanent tax benefit in the 2010 first quarter. This $2.2 million permanent tax benefit relates to a finalization of Alleghany’s unused foreign tax credits arising from its prior ownership of World Minerals which was sold on July 14, 2005.

17


 

9. Subsequent Events
     The California Department of Insurance (the “CDI”) is responsible for periodic financial and market conduct examinations of California-domiciled insurance companies. Currently, the CDI is conducting a financial examination of PCIC for the period from July 1, 2004 through December 31, 2008. During the 2010 second quarter, the CDI provided PCIC with a draft examination report for this period, as well as a related draft actuarial report (the “Draft Actuarial Report”) for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. The CDI’s estimate in the Draft Actuarial Report of loss and loss adjustment expenses (“LAE”) reserves as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 indicates an estimate for loss and LAE reserves higher than that recorded by PCIC at such dates. Alleghany believes that PCIC’s reserves for unpaid losses and LAE are adequate and Alleghany has provided additional actuarial data to the CDI in support of PCIC’s carried reserves. If at the time the CDI issues its final examination report there remains an unresolved difference of actuarial opinion between the CDI and PCIC regarding PCIC’s loss and LAE reserves, Alleghany does not expect to increase such reserves based on the CDI’s actuarial opinion. In such a case, Alleghany intends to make a capital contribution to PCIC which will be pledged to PCIC’s California workers’ compensation deposit to bring the deposit to a level consistent with the CDI’s estimate of loss and LAE reserves. To the extent that PCIC’s actual loss experience is less than the CDI’s final estimate of PCIC’s loss and LAE reserves, over time such additional worker’s compensation deposit funds will be released back to PCIC.
     In February 2008, Alleghany announced that its Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of shares of its common stock, at such times and at prices as management may determine advisable, up to an aggregate of $300.0 million. This authorization was later expanded to include shares of Alleghany’s 5.75% mandatory convertible preferred stock, prior to its conversion into shares of common stock on June 15, 2009. As of June 30, 2010, Alleghany had repurchased approximately $278.1 million of shares under such program. In July 2010, Alleghany’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of additional shares of common stock, at such times and at prices as management may determine advisable, up to an aggregate of $300.0 million upon the completion of the previously announced program.

18


 

Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
     References to the “Company,” “Alleghany,” “we,” “us,” and “our” in Items 2, 3 and 4 of Part I, as well as in Part II, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, or “this Form 10-Q,” refer to Alleghany Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries unless the context otherwise requires. “AIHL” refers to our insurance holding company subsidiary Alleghany Insurance Holdings LLC. “RSUI” refers to our subsidiary RSUI Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries. “CATA” refers to our subsidiary Capitol Transamerica Corporation and its subsidiaries and also includes the results of operations of Platte River Insurance Company unless the context otherwise requires. “PCC” refers to our subsidiary Pacific Compensation Corporation (formerly known as Employers Direct Corporation) and its subsidiaries. Effective April 12, 2010, Employers Direct Corporation changed its name to Pacific Compensation Corporation, and the name of its insurance subsidiary from Employers Direct Insurance Company to Pacific Compensation Insurance Company, or “PCIC.” “AIHL Re” refers to our subsidiary AIHL Re LLC. Unless the context otherwise requires, references to AIHL include the results of operations of RSUI, CATA, PCC and AIHL Re. “Alleghany Properties” refers to our subsidiary Alleghany Properties Holdings LLC and its subsidiaries.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
     “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” contain disclosures which are forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include all statements that do not relate solely to historical or current facts, and can be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “project,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “believe,” “potential,” “should,” “continue” or the negative versions of those words or other comparable words. These forward-looking statements are based upon our current plans or expectations and are subject to a number of uncertainties and risks that could significantly affect current plans, anticipated actions and our future financial condition and results. These statements are not guarantees of future performance, and we have no specific intention to update these statements. The uncertainties and risks include, but are not limited to,
    significant weather-related or other natural or human-made catastrophes and disasters;
 
    the cyclical nature of the property and casualty insurance industry;
 
    changes in market prices of our equity investments and changes in value of our debt portfolio;
 
    adverse loss development for events insured by our insurance operating units in either the current year or prior years;
 
    the long-tail and potentially volatile nature of certain casualty lines of business written by our insurance operating units;
 
    the cost and availability of reinsurance;
 
    exposure to terrorist acts;
 
    the willingness and ability of our insurance operating units’ reinsurers to pay reinsurance recoverables owed to our insurance operating units;
 
    changes in the ratings assigned to our insurance operating units;
 
    claims development and the process of estimating reserves;
 
    legal and regulatory changes;

19


 

    the uncertain nature of damage theories and loss amounts; and
 
    increases in the levels of risk retention by our insurance operating units.
     Additional risks and uncertainties include general economic and political conditions, including the effects of a prolonged U.S. or global economic downturn or recession; changes in costs; variations in political, economic or other factors; risks relating to conducting operations in a competitive environment; effects of acquisition and disposition activities, inflation rates, or recessionary or expansive trends; changes in interest rates; extended labor disruptions, civil unrest, or other external factors over which we have no control; and changes in our plans, strategies, objectives, expectations, or intentions, which may happen at any time at our discretion. As a consequence, current plans, anticipated actions, and future financial condition and results may differ from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf.
Critical Accounting Estimates
     The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or “GAAP,” requires us to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period covered by the financial statements. Critical accounting estimates are defined as those estimates that are important to the presentation of our financial condition and results of operations and require us to exercise significant judgment.
     We review our critical accounting estimates and assumptions quarterly. These reviews include evaluating the adequacy of reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses and the reinsurance allowance for doubtful accounts, analyzing the recoverability of deferred tax assets, assessing goodwill for impairment and evaluating the investment portfolio for other-than-temporary declines in estimated fair value. Actual results may differ from the estimates used in preparing the financial statements.
     Readers are encouraged to review our Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, or the “2009 10-K,” for a more complete description of our critical accounting estimates.
Consolidated Results of Operations
     The following discussion and analysis presents a review of our results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. You should read this review in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and other data presented in this Form 10-Q as well as “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Risk Factors” contained in our 2009 10-K and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010. Our results for the first six months of 2010 are not indicative of operating results in future periods.
Overview
     We are engaged, through AIHL and its subsidiaries, primarily in the property and casualty and surety insurance business. We also own and manage properties in the Sacramento, California region through our subsidiary Alleghany Properties and seek out strategic investments and conduct other activities at the parent level. Strategic investments currently include an approximately 33 percent stake in Homesite

20


 

Group Incorporated, or “Homesite,” a national, full-service, mono-line provider of homeowners insurance, and an approximately 38 percent stake in ORX Exploration Inc., or “ORX,” a regional gas and oil exploration and production company. Our primary sources of revenues and earnings are our insurance operations and investments.
     The profitability of our insurance operating units, and as a result, our profitability, is primarily impacted by the adequacy of premium rates, level of catastrophe losses, investment returns, intensity of competition, and the cost of reinsurance. The adequacy of premium rates is affected mainly by the severity and frequency of claims, which are influenced by many factors, including natural disasters, regulatory measures and court decisions that define and expand the extent of coverage, and the effects of economic inflation on the amount of compensation due for injuries or losses. The ultimate adequacy of premium rates is not known with certainty at the time property and casualty insurance policies are issued because premiums are determined before claims are reported.
     Catastrophe losses, or the absence thereof, can have a significant impact on our results. For example, RSUI’s pre-tax catastrophe losses, net of reinsurance, were minimal in 2009, compared with $97.9 million in 2008 (primarily reflecting net losses from 2008 third quarter Hurricanes Ike, Gustav and Dolly). The incidence and severity of catastrophes in any short period of time are inherently unpredictable. Catastrophes can cause losses in a variety of our property and casualty lines of business, and most of our past catastrophe-related claims have resulted from severe hurricanes. Longer-term natural catastrophe trends may be changing due to climate change, a phenomenon that has been associated with extreme weather events linked to rising temperatures, and includes effects on global weather patterns, sea, land and air temperatures, sea levels, rain and snow. Climate change, to the extent it produces rising temperatures and changes in weather patterns, could impact the frequency or severity of weather events such as hurricanes. To the extent climate change increases the frequency and severity of such weather events, our insurance operating units, particularly RSUI, may face increased claims, particularly with respect to properties located in coastal areas. Our insurance operating units take certain measures to mitigate against the frequency and severity of such events by giving consideration to these risks in their underwriting and pricing decisions and through the purchase of reinsurance.
     At June 30, 2010, we had consolidated total investments of approximately $4.3 billion, of which approximately $2.9 billion was invested in debt securities and approximately $863.2 million was invested in equity securities. Net realized capital gains, other-than-temporary impairment losses and net investment income related to such investment assets are subject to market conditions and management investment decisions and as a result can have a significant impact on our profitability. In the first six months of 2010, net realized capital gains were $59.8 million, compared with $140.0 million in the corresponding 2009 period, and other-than-temporary impairment losses were $6.8 million in the first six months of 2010, compared with $75.8 million in the corresponding 2009 period.
     The profitability of our insurance operating units is also impacted by competition generally and price competition in particular. Historically, the financial performance of the property and casualty insurance industry has tended to fluctuate in cyclical periods of price competition and excess underwriting capacity followed by periods of high premium rates and shortages of underwriting capacity. Although an individual insurance company’s financial performance is dependent on its own specific business characteristics, the profitability of most property and casualty insurance companies tends to follow this cyclical market pattern. In the past few years, our insurance operating units have faced increasing

21


 

competition as a result of an increased flow of capital into the insurance industry, with both new entrants and existing insurers seeking to gain market share. This has resulted in decreased premium rates and less favorable contract terms and conditions. In particular, RSUI and CATA’s specialty lines of business increasingly encounter competition from admitted companies seeking to increase market share. We expect to continue to face strong competition in these and the other lines of business of our insurance operating units, and our insurance operating units may continue to experience decreases in premium rates and/or premium volume and less favorable contract terms and conditions.
     As part of their overall risk and capacity management strategy, our insurance operating units purchase reinsurance for certain amounts of risk underwritten by them, especially catastrophe risks. The reinsurance programs purchased by our insurance operating units are generally subject to annual renewal. Market conditions beyond the control of our insurance operating units determine the availability and cost of the reinsurance protection they purchase, which may affect the level of business written and thus their profitability.
     The following table summarizes our consolidated revenues, costs and expenses and earnings.
                                 
    Three months ended June 30.     Six months ended June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Revenues
                               
Net premiums earned
  $ 188.8     $ 204.5     $ 383.6     $ 422.6  
Net investment income
    32.7       24.6       64.1       51.6  
Net realized capital gains
    33.3       79.5       59.8       140.0  
Other than temporary impairment losses
    (5.7 )     (9.7 )     (6.8 )     (75.8 )
Other income
    1.5       0.6       1.6       1.0  
 
                       
Total revenues
  $ 250.6     $ 299.5     $ 502.3     $ 539.4  
 
                       
 
                               
Costs and expenses
                               
Loss and loss adjustment expenses
  $ 83.0     $ 143.9     $ 179.8     $ 256.7  
Commissions, brokerage and other underwriting expenses
    64.8       70.2       131.1       137.7  
Other operating expenses
    8.1       12.3       16.9       21.5  
Corporate administration
    6.3       7.2       11.5       7.1  
Interest expense
    0.2       0.2       0.4       0.4  
 
                       
Total costs and expenses
  $ 162.4     $ 233.8     $ 339.7     $ 423.4  
 
                       
 
                               
Earnings before income taxes
  $ 88.2     $ 65.7     $ 162.6     $ 116.0  
Income taxes
    21.9       19.7       38.2       25.4  
 
                       
Net earnings
  $ 66.3     $ 46.0     $ 124.4     $ 90.6  
 
                       
 
                               
Revenues:
                               
AIHL
  $ 249.0     $ 241.9     $ 498.9     $ 428.9  
Corporate activities*
    1.6       57.6       3.4       110.5  
Earnings before income taxes:
                               
AIHL
  $ 93.5     $ 16.0     $ 171.8     $ 13.8  
Corporate activities*
    (5.3 )     49.7       (9.2 )     102.2  
 
*   Corporate activities consist of Alleghany Properties, our investments in Homesite and ORX and corporate activities at the parent level.
     Our earnings before income taxes in the 2010 second quarter increased from the corresponding 2009 period, primarily reflecting a decrease in loss and loss adjustment expenses, or “LAE,” partially offset by lower net realized capital gains. The decrease in loss and LAE primarily reflects lower RSUI property

22


 

claims incurred in the second quarter of 2010 compared with the 2009 second quarter, and the absence of adverse reserve development at PCC in the 2010 second quarter compared with $34.5 million of adverse development recorded in the 2009 second quarter. In addition, loss and LAE for PCC decreased substantially in the 2010 second quarter from the corresponding 2009 period reflecting PCC’s determination to cease soliciting new and renewal business on a direct basis in June 2009. The decrease in net realized capital gains primarily reflects the absence of sales of common stock of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation, or “Burlington Northern,” in the 2010 period, which were significant in the 2009 period.
     Our earnings before income taxes in the first six months of 2010 increased from the corresponding 2009 period, primarily reflecting a decrease in loss and LAE and lower other-than-temporary impairment losses, partially offset by lower net realized capital gains and net premiums earned. The decrease in other-than-temporary impairment losses was due to improvements in U.S. equity market conditions since the 2009 first quarter when we incurred significant losses primarily related to a significant deterioration of U.S. equity and, to a lesser extent, residential housing market conditions. The decrease in net premiums earned primarily reflects the impact of continuing competition at our insurance operating units. The decreases in loss and LAE and net realized capital gains in the first six months of 2010 compared with the corresponding 2009 period reflect the impact of the factors discussed above with respect to the quarter over quarter results.
     The effective tax rate on earnings before income taxes was 23.4 percent for the first six months of 2010, compared with 21.9 percent for the corresponding 2009 period. The higher effective tax rate in 2010 primarily reflects the lesser impact of tax-exempt income on our increased earnings in the 2010 period, partially offset by our recognition of a permanent tax benefit in the 2010 first quarter. This $2.2 million permanent tax benefit relates to a finalization of our unused foreign tax credits arising from our prior ownership of World Minerals, Inc. which we sold on July 14, 2005.

23


 

AIHL Operating Results
AIHL Operating Unit Pre-Tax Results
                                         
    RSUI     AIHL Re     CATA     PCC     AIHL  
    (in millions, except ratios)  
Three months ended June 30, 2010
                                       
Gross premiums written
  $ 300.6     $     $ 47.0     $ (0.6 )   $ 347.0  
Net premiums written
    185.1             44.3       (0.6 )     228.8  
 
                                       
Net premiums earned (1)
  $ 146.3     $     $ 41.5     $ 1.0     $ 188.8  
Loss and loss adjustment expenses
    62.3             19.6       1.1       83.0  
Commission, brokerage and other underwriting expenses (2)
    40.2             19.2       5.4       64.8  
 
                             
Underwriting profit (loss) (3)
  $ 43.8     $     $ 2.7     $ (5.5 )   $ 41.0  
 
                               
 
                                       
Net investment income (1)
                                    33.0  
Net realized capital gains (1)
                                    32.7  
Other than temporary impairment losses (1)
                                    (5.7 )
Other income (1)
                                    0.2  
Other expenses (2)
                                    7.7  
 
                                     
Earnings before income taxes
                                  $ 93.5  
 
                                     
 
                                       
Loss ratio (4)
    42.6 %           47.2 %     110.8 %     44.0 %
Expense ratio (5)
    27.4 %           46.3 %     518.7 %     34.3 %
 
                             
Combined ratio (6)
    70.0 %           93.5 %     629.5 %     78.3 %
 
                                       
Three months ended June 30, 2009
                                       
Gross premiums written
  $ 337.0     $     $ 45.1     $ 15.6     $ 397.7  
Net premiums written
    209.5             43.4       11.7       264.6  
 
                                       
Net premiums earned (1)
  $ 159.2     $     $ 41.2     $ 4.1     $ 204.5  
Loss and loss adjustment expenses
    76.0             19.0       48.9       143.9  
Commission, brokerage and other underwriting expenses (2)
    42.4             18.5       9.3       70.2  
 
                             
Underwriting profit (loss) (3)
  $ 40.8     $     $ 3.7     $ (54.1 )   $ (9.6 )
 
                               
 
                                       
Net investment income (1)
                                    27.7  
Net realized capital gains (1)
                                    19.0  
Other than temporary impairment losses (1)
                                    (9.7 )
Other income (1)
                                    0.4  
Other expenses (2)
                                    11.8  
 
                                     
Earnings before income taxes
                                  $ 16.0  
 
                                     
 
                                       
Loss ratio (4)
    47.8 %           46.1 %     1197.8 %     70.4 %
Expense ratio (5)
    26.6 %           45.0 %     229.3 %     34.4 %
 
                             
Combined ratio (6)
    74.4 %           91.1 %     1427.1 %     104.8 %

24


 

                                         
    RSUI     AIHL Re     CATA     PCC     AIHL  
    (in millions, except ratios)  
Six months ended June 30, 2010
                                       
Gross premiums written
  $ 522.6     $     $ 87.5     $ 1.9     $ 612.0  
Net premiums written
    315.5             82.5       1.8       399.8  
 
                                       
Net premiums earned (1)
  $ 296.6     $     $ 82.1     $ 4.9     $ 383.6  
Loss and loss adjustment expenses
    135.2             40.6       4.0       179.8  
Commission, brokerage and other underwriting expenses (2)
    80.8             38.5       11.8       131.1  
 
                             
Underwriting profit (loss) (3)
  $ 80.6     $     $ 3.0     $ (10.9 )   $ 72.7  
 
                               
 
                                       
Net investment income (1)
                                    66.3  
Net realized capital gains (1)
                                    55.5  
Other than temporary impairment losses (1)
                                    (6.8 )
Other income (1)
                                    0.3  
Other expenses (2)
                                    16.2  
 
                                     
Earnings before income taxes
                                  $ 171.8  
 
                                     
 
                                       
Loss ratio (4)
    45.6 %           49.4 %     82.1 %     46.8 %
Expense ratio (5)
    27.3 %           47.0 %     241.7 %     34.2 %
 
                             
Combined ratio (6)
    72.9 %           96.4 %     323.8 %     81.0 %
 
                                       
Six months ended June 30, 2009
                                       
Gross premiums written
  $ 587.1     $     $ 87.2     $ 32.1     $ 706.4  
Net premiums written
    359.2             81.6       27.0       467.8  
 
                                       
Net premiums earned (1)
  $ 319.9     $     $ 83.2     $ 19.5     $ 422.6  
Loss and loss adjustment expenses
    153.5             39.9       63.3       256.7  
Commission, brokerage and other underwriting expenses (2)
    83.4             37.4       16.9       137.7  
 
                             
Underwriting profit (loss) (3)
  $ 83.0     $     $ 5.9     $ (60.7 )   $ 28.2  
 
                               
 
                                       
Net investment income (1)
                                    54.7  
Net realized capital gains (1)
                                    26.5  
Other than temporary impairment losses (1)
                                    (75.8 )
Other income (1)
                                    0.9  
Other expenses (2)
                                    20.7  
 
                                     
Earnings before income taxes
                                  $ 13.8  
 
                                     
 
                                       
Loss ratio (4)
    48.0 %           48.0 %     324.7 %     60.8 %
Expense ratio (5)
    26.1 %           44.9 %     87.1 %     32.6 %
 
                             
Combined ratio (6)
    74.1 %           92.9 %     411.8 %     93.4 %
 
(1)   Represent components of total revenues.
 
(2)   Commission, brokerage and other underwriting expenses represent commission and brokerage expenses and that portion of salaries, administration and other operating expenses attributable primarily to underwriting activities, whereas the remainder constitutes other expenses.
 
(3)   Represents net premiums earned less loss and LAE and commission, brokerage and other underwriting expenses, all as determined in accordance with GAAP, and does not include net investment income, net realized capital gains, other-than-temporary impairment losses, other income or other expenses. Underwriting profit does not replace net earnings determined in accordance with GAAP as a measure of profitability; rather, we believe that underwriting profit, which does not include net investment income, net realized capital gains, other-than-temporary impairment losses, other income or other expenses, enhances the understanding of AIHL’s insurance operating units’ operating results by highlighting net earnings attributable to their underwriting performance. With the addition of net investment income, net realized capital gains, other-than-temporary impairment losses, other income and other expenses, reported pre-tax net earnings (a GAAP measure) may show a profit despite an underlying underwriting loss. Where underwriting losses persist over extended periods, an insurance company’s ability to continue as an ongoing concern may be at risk. Therefore, we view underwriting profit as an important measure in the overall evaluation of performance.
 
(4)   Loss and LAE divided by net premiums earned, all as determined in accordance with GAAP.

25


 

(5)   Commission, brokerage and other underwriting expenses divided by net premiums earned, all as determined in accordance with GAAP.
 
(6)   The sum of the loss ratio and expense ratio, all as determined in accordance with GAAP, representing the percentage of each premium dollar an insurance company has to spend on losses and LAE and commission, brokerage and other underwriting expenses.
     Discussion of individual AIHL operating unit results follows, and AIHL investment results are discussed below under “AIHL Investment Results.”
RSUI
     The decrease in gross premiums written by RSUI in the second quarter and first six months of 2010 from the corresponding 2009 periods primarily reflects the impact of reduced exposures of RSUI’s customers and continuing and increasing competition, particularly in RSUI’s property, umbrella/excess and general liability lines of business, partially offset by growth in RSUI’s binding authority business. RSUI’s net premiums earned decreased in the second quarter and first six months of 2010 from the corresponding 2009 periods primarily due to the decline in gross premiums written, partially offset by a decrease in ceded premiums written associated primarily with RSUI’s property line of business.
     The decrease in loss and LAE in the second quarter and first six months of 2010 from the corresponding 2009 periods primarily reflects lower non-catastrophe property losses incurred, the impact of lower net premiums earned, and with respect to the 2010 second quarter, a higher net release of prior accident year reserves. Loss and LAE in the 2010 second quarter reflect a net $16.0 million release of prior accident year loss reserves, compared with an $11.9 million reserve release of prior accident year loss reserves during the 2009 second quarter. The net $16.0 million reserve release in the 2010 second quarter reflects a $21.3 million reserve release in RSUI’s casualty lines of business and a $5.3 million reserve increase in RSUI’s property reserves related to prior year catastrophes.
     The $21.3 million reserve release in RSUI’s casualty lines of business in the 2010 second quarter relates primarily to the general liability, professional liability and umbrella/excess lines of business primarily for the 2003 through 2007 accident years and reflects favorable loss emergence, compared with loss emergence patterns assumed in earlier periods for such lines of business. Specifically, cumulative losses for such lines of business, which include both loss payments and case reserves, in respect of prior accident years were expected to be higher through June 30, 2010 than the actual cumulative losses through that date. The amount of lower cumulative losses, expressed as a percentage of carried loss and LAE reserves at the beginning of the year, was 5.6 percent. Such reduction did not impact the assumptions used in estimating RSUI’s loss and LAE liabilities for its general liability, professional liability and umbrella/excess lines of business earned in 2010. The $5.3 million reserve increase in RSUI’s property reserves in the 2010 second quarter relates to an increase in loss reserves related to specific cases from third quarter 2008 catastrophes. The $11.9 million reserve release in RSUI’s casualty lines of business in the 2009 second quarter relates primarily to the general liability, professional liability and directors and officers, or “D&O,” liability lines of business primarily for the 2003 through 2006 accident years and reflects favorable loss emergence, compared with loss emergence patterns assumed in earlier periods for such lines of business.
     Loss and LAE in the first six months of 2010 reflect a net $8.5 million release of prior accident year loss reserves, consisting of the net $16.0 million reserve release discussed above in the 2010 second

26


 

quarter and a net $7.5 million increase in loss reserves in the first quarter of 2010. The $7.5 million increase in loss reserves in the first quarter of 2010 relates to an increase in estimated ultimate 2007 accident year losses for the D&O liability line of business, reflecting, in part, unfavorable loss emergence on certain sub-prime mortgage industry claims. Such increase did not impact the assumptions used in estimating RSUI’s loss and LAE liabilities for its D&O line of business earned in 2010. The $8.5 million reserve release in the first six months of 2010 compares with the $11.9 million release of prior accident year loss reserves during the first six months of 2009 described above with respect to quarter over quarter results.
     The decrease in loss and LAE, partially offset by a decrease in net premiums earned, was the primary cause for the increase in RSUI’s underwriting profit in the second quarter of 2010 from the corresponding 2009 period. The decrease in net premiums earned, partially offset by a decrease in loss and LAE, was the primary cause for the decrease in RSUI’s underwriting profit in the first six months of 2010 from the corresponding 2009 period.
     In general, rates at RSUI in the first six months of 2010, compared with the corresponding 2009 period, reflect overall industry trends of lower pricing as a result of increased competition. RSUI continued to see fewer qualified opportunities to write business in the first six months of 2010, as a more competitive market caused less business to flow into the wholesale marketplace in which RSUI operates.
     As discussed in the 2009 10-K, RSUI reinsures its property lines of business through a program consisting of surplus share treaties, facultative placements, per risk, and catastrophe excess of loss treaties. RSUI’s catastrophe reinsurance program (which covers catastrophe risks including, among others, windstorms and earthquakes) and per risk reinsurance program run on an annual basis from May 1 to the following April 30 and thus expired on April 30, 2010. RSUI placed all of its catastrophe reinsurance program for the 2010-2011 period, and the new program is substantially similar to the expired program. The new reinsurance program provides coverage in two layers for $400.0 million of losses in excess of a $100.0 million net retention after application of the surplus share treaties, facultative reinsurance and per risk covers. The first layer provides coverage for $100.0 million of losses, before a 33 percent co-participation by RSUI, in excess of the $100.0 million net retention, and the second layer provides coverage for $300.0 million of losses, before a 5 percent co-participation by RSUI, in excess of $200.0 million. In addition, RSUI’s property per risk reinsurance program for the 2010-2011 period provides RSUI with coverage for $90.0 million of losses, before a 10 percent co-participation by RSUI (compared with no RSUI co-participation under the expired program), in excess of a $10.0 million net retention per risk after application of the surplus share treaties and facultative reinsurance.
     As discussed in Note 5(d) to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Item 8 of the 2009 10-K, RSUI reinsures its other lines of business through quota share treaties, except for professional liability and binding authority lines where RSUI retains all of such business. RSUI’s quota share reinsurance treaty for umbrella/excess renewed on June 1, 2010 on the same terms as the expiring treaty, providing coverage for policies with limits up to $30.0 million, with RSUI ceding 35 percent of the premium and loss for policies with limits up to $15.0 million and ceding 67.5 percent of the premium and loss for policies with limits in excess of $15.0 million up to $30.0 million. RSUI’s D&O liability line quota share reinsurance treaty renewed on July 1, 2010 on the same terms as the expiring treaty, providing coverage for policies with limits up to $20.0 million, with RSUI ceding 35 percent of the premium and loss for policies with limits up to $10.0 million and ceding 60 percent of the premium and

27


 

loss for policies with limits in excess of $10.0 million up to $20.0 million.
CATA
     CATA’s net premiums earned decreased slightly in the first six months of 2010 from the corresponding 2009 period primarily reflecting continuing price competition in CATA’s property and casualty (including in excess and surplus markets) and commercial surety lines of business, partially offset by higher gross premiums written and net premiums earned in CATA’s specialty markets division and miscellaneous errors and omissions liability lines of business.
     The increase in loss and LAE in the second quarter and first six months of 2010 from the corresponding 2009 periods primarily reflects a lower amount of prior year reserve releases in the 2010 periods. During the first six months of 2010, CATA had net prior year reserve releases of $4.3 million (of which $3.5 million related to the 2010 second quarter), compared with $7.7 million in the first six months of 2009 (of which $4.8 million related to the 2009 second quarter). The $4.3 million reserve release primarily reflects favorable loss emergence for various discontinued liability coverages related to asbestos and environmental impairment claims that arose from reinsurance assumed by a subsidiary of CATA between 1969 and 1976, based on a reserve study that was completed in the 2010 second quarter. In addition, the $4.3 million reserve release includes a modest amount of net prior year reserve releases in the casualty and surety lines of business compared with loss emergence patterns assumed in earlier periods for such lines of business. Such reduction did not impact the assumptions used in estimating CATA’s loss and LAE liabilities for its casualty and surety lines of business earned in 2010.
     The increase in loss and LAE described above was the primary cause for the decrease in CATA’s underwriting profit in the second quarter of 2010 from the corresponding 2009 period. The decrease in net premiums earned and the increase in loss and LAE described above were the primary causes for the decrease in CATA’s underwriting profit in the first six months of 2010 from the corresponding 2009 period.
     In general, rates at CATA in the first six months of 2010, compared with the corresponding 2009 period, reflect overall industry trends of lower pricing as a result of increased competition.
PCC
     PCC reported an underwriting loss of $10.9 million for the first six months of 2010, primarily reflecting a substantial decrease in net premiums earned from the corresponding 2009 period as a result of PCC’s determination to cease soliciting new and renewal business on a direct basis in June 2009. PCC’s decision to cease soliciting new and renewal business on a direct basis was due to its determination that it was unable to write business at rates it deemed adequate due to the state of the California workers’ compensation market. On June 30, 2009, A.M. Best downgraded its rating of PCIC from A- (Excellent), with a negative outlook, to B++ (Good), with a stable outlook. Commencing August 1, 2009, PCC ceased soliciting new or renewal business on a direct basis and took corresponding expense reduction steps, including staff reductions, in light of such determination.

28


 

     Effective April 12, 2010, as part of a strategic repositioning effort, Employers Direct Corporation changed its name to Pacific Compensation Corporation and the name of its insurance subsidiary from Employers Direct Insurance Company to Pacific Compensation Insurance Company.
     PCC reported an underwriting loss of $60.7 million for the first six months of 2009, primarily reflecting a substantial decrease in net earned premiums, a $34.5 million reserve increase in the 2009 second quarter, and an $8.0 million increase in its premium deficiency reserve in the 2009 second quarter. Of the $34.5 million reserve increase, $26.5 million related to prior accident years and $8.0 million related to the 2009 accident year. In addition, PCC also recorded a pre-tax non-cash impairment charge of $11.2 million in the 2009 second quarter, which is classified as a net realized capital loss in its consolidated statement of earnings.
     The California Department of Insurance, or the “CDI,” is responsible for periodic financial and market conduct examinations of California-domiciled insurance companies. Currently, the CDI is conducting a financial examination of PCIC for the period from July 1, 2004 through December 31, 2008. During the 2010 second quarter, the CDI provided PCIC with a draft examination report for this period, as well as a related draft actuarial report (the “Draft Actuarial Report”) for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. The CDI’s estimate in the Draft Actuarial Report of loss and LAE reserves as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 indicates an estimate for loss and LAE reserves higher than that recorded by PCIC at such dates. We believe that PCIC’s reserves for unpaid losses and LAE are adequate and we have provided additional actuarial data to the CDI in support of PCIC’s carried reserves. If at the time the CDI issues its final examination report there remains an unresolved difference of actuarial opinion between the CDI and PCIC regarding PCIC’s loss and LAE reserves, we do not expect to increase such reserves based on the CDI’s actuarial opinion. In such a case, we intend to make a capital contribution to PCIC which will be pledged to PCIC’s California workers’ compensation deposit to bring the deposit to a level consistent with the CDI’s estimate of loss and LAE reserves. To the extent that PCIC’s actual loss experience is less than the CDI’s final estimate of PCIC’s loss and LAE reserves, over time such additional worker’s compensation deposit funds will be released back to PCIC. We do not expect that any capital contribution, which will be based on the CDI’s final examination report, will have a material impact upon our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
AIHL Investment Results
     Following is information relating to AIHL’s investment results.
                                 
    Three months ended June 30,     Six months ended June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Net investment income
  $ 33.0     $ 27.7     $ 66.3     $ 54.7  
Net realized capital gains
  $ 32.7     $ 19.0     $ 55.5     $ 26.5  
Other than temporary impairment losses
  $ (5.7 )   $ (9.7 )   $ (6.8 )   $ (75.8 )
     Net Investment Income. The increase in AIHL’s net investment income in the second quarter and first six months of 2010 from the corresponding 2009 periods is due principally to improved results from partnership investments, primarily equity method partnership investments, and higher dividend income.
     Net Realized Capital Gains. Net realized capital gains in the second quarter and first six months of 2010 and 2009 relate primarily to sales of equity securities in the energy sector, some of which had their cost basis reduced in earlier periods for the recognition of unrealized losses through other-than-

29


 

temporary impairment losses. In addition, the second quarter and first six months of 2009 include $11.2 million of other impairment losses incurred by PCC in the 2009 second quarter (see Note 4(a) to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Item 8 of the 2009 10-K).
     Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Losses. Other-than-temporary impairment losses for the six months ended June 30, 2010 reflect $6.8 million of unrealized losses that were deemed to be other-than-temporary and, as such, were required to be charged against earnings. Of the $6.8 million, $6.5 million related to equity holdings (primarily in the energy sector), and $0.3 million related to debt security holdings (all of which were deemed to be credit-related). Of the $6.8 million of impairment losses, $5.7 million was incurred in the second quarter of 2010. The determination that unrealized losses on such securities were other-than-temporary was primarily based on the severity and duration of the declines in fair value of such securities relative to their cost as of the balance sheet date. Other-than-temporary impairment losses for the first six months of 2009 reflect $75.8 million of unrealized losses that were deemed to be other-than-temporary and, as such, were required to be charged against earnings. Of the $75.8 million, $47.6 million related to equity holdings in the energy sector, $16.4 million related to equity holdings in various other sectors, and $11.8 million related to debt security holdings (all of which were deemed to be credit-related). Of the $75.8 million of impairment losses, $9.7 million was incurred in the second quarter of 2009. Such severe declines primarily related to a significant deterioration of U.S. equity and, to a lesser extent, residential housing market conditions during the latter part of 2008 and extending through the first quarter of 2009, which abated somewhat in the 2009 second quarter.
     After adjusting the cost basis of securities for the recognition of other-than-temporary impairment losses, no equity security was in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or more at June 30, 2010. See Note 7 to the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q for further details concerning gross unrealized investment losses for debt and equity securities at June 30, 2010.
Corporate Activities’ Operating Results
     The following table summarizes corporate activities’ results (in millions):
                                 
    Three months ended June 30,     Six months ended June 30,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
Net investment income
  $ (0.3 )   $ (3.0 )   $ (2.2 )   $ (3.1 )
Net realized capital gains
    0.6       60.5       4.3       113.5  
Other than temporary impairment losses
                       
Other income
    1.3       0.1       1.3       0.1  
 
                       
Total revenues
  $ 1.6     $ 57.6     $ 3.4     $ 110.5  
Corporate administration and other expenses
    6.8       7.7       12.5       8.0  
Interest expense
    0.1       0.2       0.1       0.3  
 
                       
(Losses) earnings before income taxes
  $ (5.3 )   $ 49.7     $ (9.2 )   $ 102.2  
 
                       
     Corporate activities’ earnings before income taxes decreased in the second quarter and first six months of 2010 from the corresponding 2009 periods, primarily reflecting a decrease in net realized capital gains. Net realized capital gains in the second quarter and first six months of 2009 resulted primarily from parent-level sales of shares of Burlington Northern common stock.
     Expenses for corporate administration in the first six months of 2009 reflect lower incentive compensation accruals in the 2009 first quarter due partly to less favorable investment results and the

30


 

resulting reduction in earnings in such period.
     Net investment income includes $1.6 million and $2.2 million of our equity in losses of Homesite, net of purchase accounting adjustments, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Homesite losses in both periods primarily reflect the impact of increased homeowners insurance claims from severe weather and ongoing purchase accounting adjustments. Net investment income also includes $2.8 million and $5.2 million of our equity in losses of ORX, net of purchase accounting adjustments, for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. ORX losses in both periods primarily reflect additional asset impairment charges.
Reserve Review Process
     AIHL’s insurance operating units periodically analyze, at least quarterly, liabilities for unpaid losses and LAE established in prior years and adjust their expected ultimate cost, where necessary, to reflect positive or negative development in loss experience and new information, including, for certain catastrophic events, revised industry estimates of the magnitude of a catastrophe. Adjustments to previously recorded liabilities for unpaid losses and LAE, both positive and negative, are reflected in our financial results in the periods in which these adjustments are made and are referred to as prior year reserve development. The following table presents the reserves established in connection with the losses and LAE of AIHL’s insurance operating units on a gross and net basis by line of business. These reserve amounts represent the accumulation of estimates of ultimate losses (including for incurred but not yet reported losses or “IBNR”) and LAE.
                                                         
                                    Workers’              
    Property     Casualty(1)     CMP(2)     Surety     Comp(3)     All Other(4)     Total  
    (dollars in millions)  
As of June 30, 2010
                                                       
 
                                                       
Gross loss and LAE reserves
  $ 194.1     $ 1,901.2     $ 58.0     $ 17.3     $ 214.5     $ 33.8     $ 2,418.9  
Reinsurance recoverables on unpaid losses
    (79.1 )     (786.4 )     (0.1 )     (0.1 )     (20.4 )     (19.4 )     (905.5 )
 
                                         
Net loss and LAE reserves
  $ 115.0     $ 1,114.8     $ 57.9     $ 17.2     $ 194.1     $ 14.4     $ 1,513.4  
 
                                         
 
                                                       
As of December 31, 2009
                                                       
 
                                                       
Gross loss and LAE reserves
  $ 249.1     $ 1,902.4     $ 63.6     $ 18.0     $ 245.9     $ 42.0     $ 2,521.0  
Reinsurance recoverables on unpaid losses
    (104.5 )     (799.5 )     (0.2 )     (0.1 )     (20.2 )     (23.2 )     (947.7 )
 
                                         
Net loss and LAE reserves
  $ 144.6     $ 1,102.9     $ 63.4     $ 17.9     $ 225.7     $ 18.8     $ 1,573.3  
 
                                         
 
(1)   Primarily consists of umbrella/excess, D&O liability, professional liability and general liability.
 
(2)   Commercial multiple peril.
 
(3)   Workers’ compensation amounts include PCC, net of purchase accounting adjustments (see Note 4(a) to the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Item 8 of our 2009 10-K). Such adjustments include a minor reduction of gross and net loss and LAE for acquisition date discounting, as required under purchase accounting. Workers’ compensation amounts also include minor balances from CATA.
 
(4)   Primarily consists of loss and LAE reserves for terminated lines of business and loss reserves acquired in connection with prior acquisitions for which the sellers provided loss reserve guarantees. The loss and LAE reserves are ceded 100 percent to the sellers. Additional information regarding the loss reserve guarantees can be found in Note 5(b) to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements set forth in Item 8 of our 2009 10-K.
Changes in Loss and LAE Reserves between June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009
     Gross Reserves. Gross loss and LAE reserves at June 30, 2010 decreased from December 31, 2009,

31


 

due primarily to reserve decreases in property and workers’ compensation lines of business. The decrease in property gross loss and LAE reserves is mainly due to loss payments made by RSUI on hurricane related losses incurred in prior years. The decrease in workers’ compensation gross loss and LAE reserves primarily reflects the impact of PCC’s decision to cease soliciting new or renewal business on a direct basis commencing August 1, 2009.
     Net Reserves. Net loss and LAE reserves at June 30, 2010 decreased from December 31, 2009, due primarily to reserve decreases in property and workers’ compensation lines of business. The decrease in property net loss and LAE reserves is mainly due to loss payments made by RSUI on hurricane related losses incurred in prior years, net of corresponding decreases in reinsurance recoverables on unpaid losses. The decrease in workers’ compensation net loss and LAE reserves primarily reflects the impact of PCC’s decision to cease soliciting new or renewal business on a direct basis commencing August 1, 2009.
Reinsurance Recoverables
     At June 30, 2010, AIHL had total reinsurance recoverables of $945.7 million, consisting of $905.5 million of ceded outstanding losses and LAE and $40.2 million of recoverables on paid losses. RSUI’s reinsurance recoverables totaled approximately $798.2 million of AIHL’s $945.7 million. Approximately 94.1 percent of AIHL’s reinsurance recoverables balance at June 30, 2010 was due from reinsurers having an A.M. Best financial strength rating of A (Excellent) or higher. AIHL’s Reinsurance Security Committee, which includes certain of our officers and the chief financial officer of each of AIHL’s operating units and which manages the use of reinsurance by such operating units, has determined that reinsurers with a rating of A (Excellent) or higher have an ability to meet their ongoing obligations at a level that is acceptable to us.
     Information regarding concentration of AIHL’s reinsurance recoverables at June 30, 2010 is as follows (dollars in millions):
                         
Reinsurer(1)   Rating(2)     Dollar Amount     Percentage  
Swiss Reinsurance Company
  A (Excellent)   $ 169.3       17.9 %
The Chubb Corporation
  A++ (Superior)     103.4       10.9 %
Platinum Underwriters Holdings, Ltd.
  A (Excellent)     98.5       10.4 %
All other reinsurers
            574.5       60.8 %
 
                   
Total
          $ 945.7       100.0 %
 
                   
 
(1)   Reinsurance recoverables reflect amounts due from one or more reinsurance subsidiaries of the listed reinsurer.
 
(2)   Represents the A.M. Best rating for the applicable reinsurance subsidiary or subsidiaries from which the reinsurance recoverable is due.
     At June 30, 2010, AIHL also had fully collateralized reinsurance recoverables of $109.8 million due from Darwin Professional Underwriters, Inc., or “Darwin.” AIHL owned approximately 55 percent of Darwin, a specialty property and casualty insurer, until October 20, 2008, when it was merged with a subsidiary of Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, Ltd. The A.M. Best financial strength rating of Darwin was A (Excellent) at June 30, 2010. AIHL had no allowance for uncollectible reinsurance as of June 30, 2010.

32


 

Financial Condition
Parent Level
     General. In general, we follow a policy of maintaining a relatively liquid financial condition at the parent company. This policy has permitted us to expand our operations through internal growth at our subsidiaries and through acquisitions of, or substantial investments in, operating companies. At June 30, 2010, we held marketable securities and cash of approximately $73.3 million at the parent company and $656.3 million at AIHL, which totaled $729.6 million. We believe that we have and will have adequate internally generated funds and cash resources to provide for the currently foreseeable needs of our business, and we had no material commitments for capital expenditures at June 30, 2010.
     Stockholders’ equity decreased slightly to approximately $2.71 billion as of June 30, 2010, compared with approximately $2.72 billion as of December 31, 2009, representing a decrease of 0.1 percent. The decrease in stockholders’ equity primarily reflects the repurchase of our common stock pursuant to our repurchase program described below and a decrease in net unrealized appreciation in our investment portfolio in the first six months of 2010, partially offset by net earnings in the first six months of 2010.
     Common Stock Repurchases. In February 2008, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized the repurchase of shares of our common stock, at such times and at prices as management may determine advisable, up to an aggregate of $300.0 million. This authorization was later expanded to include shares of our 5.75% mandatory convertible preferred stock, prior to its conversion into shares of common stock on June 15, 2009. As of June 30, 2010, we had repurchased approximately $278.1 million of shares under such program. In July 2010, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of additional shares of our common stock, at such times and at prices as management may determine advisable, up to an aggregate of $300.0 million, upon completion of the previously announced program. During the first six months of 2010, we repurchased an aggregate of 207,133 shares of our common stock in the open market for approximately $59.8 million, at an average price per share of $288.78 (share and average price amounts are not adjusted for the stock dividend declared in February 2010). As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had 8,843,282 and 9,037,561 shares of our common stock outstanding, respectively. Unless stated otherwise, all preceding figures have been adjusted to reflect the common stock dividend declared in February 2010 and paid in April 2010.
Subsidiaries
     Financial strength is also a high priority of our subsidiaries, whose assets stand behind their financial commitments to their customers and vendors. We believe that our subsidiaries have and will have adequate internally generated funds, cash resources, and unused credit facilities to provide for the currently foreseeable needs of their businesses. Our subsidiaries had no material commitments for capital expenditures at June 30, 2010.
     The obligations and cash outflow of AIHL’s insurance operating units include claim settlements, administrative expenses and purchases of investments. In addition to premium collections, cash inflow is obtained from interest and dividend income and maturities and sales of investments. Because cash inflow from premiums is received in advance of cash outflow required to settle claims, AIHL’s insurance

33


 

operating units accumulate funds which they invest pending the need for liquidity. As an insurance company’s cash needs can be unpredictable due to the uncertainty of the claims settlement process, AIHL’s portfolio, which includes those of its insurance operating units, is composed primarily of debt securities and short-term investments to ensure the availability of funds and maintain a sufficient amount of liquid securities. As of June 30, 2010, investments and cash represented 70.7 percent of the assets of AIHL and its insurance operating units.
Consolidated Investment Holdings
     Overview. On a consolidated basis, our invested asset portfolio was approximately $4.3 billion as of June 30, 2010, a decrease of 2.3 percent from December 31, 2009. The decrease is due to a decrease in net unrealized appreciation of our equity security portfolio during the first six months of 2010, negative cash flow at PCC, cash payments for year-end 2009 incentive compensation and our repurchase of common stock pursuant to our repurchase program, partially offset by positive cash flow from underwriting activities at RSUI and a modest increase in net unrealized appreciation on our debt security portfolio. Negative cash flow at PCC was a result of PCC’s determination to cease soliciting new and renewal business on a direct basis in June 2009.
     At June 30, 2010, the average duration of our consolidated debt securities portfolio was 3.4 years, compared with 3.5 years at December 31, 2009. The overall debt securities portfolio credit quality is measured using the lower of either Standard & Poor’s or Moody’s rating. In this regard, the weighted average rating at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was AA+, with substantially all securities rated investment grade. We hold in our portfolio debt securities of a subsidiary of BP p.l.c., which at June 30, 2010 had an amortized cost of $24.6 million and a fair value of $20.8 million.
     Fair Value. The estimated carrying values and fair values of our consolidated financial instruments as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as follows (in millions):
                                 
    June 30, 2010     December 31, 2009  
    Carrying     Fair     Carrying     Fair  
    Value     Value     Value     Value  
Assets
                               
Investments (excluding equity method investments and loans)*
  $ 4,101.7     $ 4,101.7     $ 4,211.6     $ 4,211.6  
 
*   This table includes available-for-sale investments (securities as well as partnership investments carried at fair value that are included in other invested assets). This table excludes investments accounted for using the equity method (Homesite, ORX and other partnership investments) and certain loans receivable that are carried at cost, all of which are included in other invested assets. The fair value of short-term investments approximates amortized cost. The fair value of all other categories of investments is discussed below.
     GAAP defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value measurements are not adjusted for transaction costs. In addition, GAAP establishes a three-tiered hierarchy for inputs used in management’s determination of fair value of financial instruments that emphasizes the use of observable inputs over the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity. Unobservable inputs are the reporting entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions based on the best information available under the circumstances. In assessing the appropriateness of using observable inputs in making

34


 

our fair value determinations, we consider whether the market for a particular security is “active” or not based on all the relevant facts and circumstances. For example, we may consider a market to be inactive if there are relatively few recent transactions or if there is a significant decrease in market volume. Furthermore, we consider whether observable transactions are “orderly” or not. We do not consider a transaction to be orderly if there is evidence of a forced liquidation or other distressed condition, and as such, little or no weight is given to that transaction as an indicator of fair value.
     The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:
    “Level 1” — Valuations are based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical, unrestricted assets. Since valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily and regularly available in an active market, valuation of these assets does not involve any meaningful degree of judgment. An active market is defined as a market where transactions for the financial instrument occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. Our Level 1 assets generally include publicly traded common stocks and debt securities issued directly by the U.S. Government, where our valuations are based on quoted market prices.
 
    “Level 2” — Valuations are based on quoted market prices where such markets are not deemed to be sufficiently “active.” In such circumstances, additional valuation metrics will be used which involve direct or indirect observable market inputs. Our Level 2 assets generally include preferred stocks and debt securities other than debt issued directly by the U.S. Government. Substantially all of the determinations of value in this category are based on a single quote from third-party dealers and pricing services. As we generally do not make any adjustments thereto, such quote typically constitutes the sole input in our determination of the fair value of these types of securities. In developing a quote, such third parties will use the terms of the security and market-based inputs. Terms of the security include coupon, maturity date, and any special provisions that may, for example, enable the investor, at its election, to redeem the security prior to its scheduled maturity date. Market-based inputs include the level of interest rates applicable to comparable securities in the market place and current credit rating(s) of the security. Such quotes are generally non-binding.
 
    “Level 3” — Valuations are based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. Valuation under Level 3 generally involves a significant degree of judgment on our part. Our Level 3 assets are primarily limited to partnership investments. Net asset value quotes from the third-party general partner of the entity in which such investments are held, which will often be based on unobservable market inputs, constitute the primary input in our determination of the fair value of such assets.
     We validate the reasonableness of our fair value determinations for Level 2 securities by testing the methodology of the relevant third-party dealer or pricing service that provides the quotes upon which the fair value determinations are made. We test the methodology by comparing such quotes with prices from executed market trades when such trades occur. We discuss with the relevant third-party dealer or pricing service any identified material discrepancy between the quote derived from its methodology and the executed market trade in order to resolve the discrepancy. We use the quote from the third-party dealer or pricing service unless we determine that the methodology used to produce such quote is not in compliance with GAAP. In addition to such procedures, we also compare the aggregate amount of the fair value for such Level 2 securities with the aggregate fair value provided by a third-party financial

35


 

institution. Furthermore, we review the reasonableness of its classification of securities within the three-tiered hierarchy to ensure that the classification is consistent with GAAP.
     The estimated carrying values of our financial instruments as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 allocated among the three levels set forth above were as follows (in millions):
                                 
    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3 (1)     Total  
As of June 30, 2010
                               
Equity securities:
                               
Common stock
  $ 863.2     $     $     $ 863.2  
Preferred stock
                       
Debt securities:
                               
U.S. Government obligations
    249.2                   249.2  
Mortgage and asset-backed securities (2)
          985.9               985.9  
States, municipalities and political subdivisions bonds
          1,136.0             1,136.0  
Foreign bonds
          104.7             104.7  
Corporate bonds and other
          384.8             384.8  
 
                       
 
    249.2       2,611.4             2,860.6  
 
                       
Short-term investments
    195.8       158.1             353.9  
Other invested assets
                24.0       24.0  
 
                       
Investments (excluding equity method investments)
  $ 1,308.2     $ 2,769.5     $ 24.0     $ 4,101.7  
 
                       
As of December 31, 2009
                               
Equity securities:
                               
Common stock
  $ 624.5     $     $     $ 624.5  
Preferred stock
                       
Debt securities:
                               
U.S. Government obligations
    638.4                   638.4  
Mortgage and asset-backed securities (2)
          958.8             958.8  
States, municipalities and political subdivisions bonds
          1,234.0             1,234.0  
Foreign bonds
          144.3             144.3  
Corporate bonds and other
          313.5             313.5  
 
                       
 
    638.4       2,650.6             3,289.0  
 
                       
Short-term investments
    75.2       187.7             262.9  
Other invested assets
                35.2       35.2  
 
                       
Investments (excluding equity method investments)
  $ 1,338.1     $ 2,838.3     $ 35.2     $ 4,211.6  
 
                       
 
(1)   Level 3 securities consist of partnership investments and certain debt securities. The carrying value of partnership investments of $24.0 million decreased by $11.2 million from the December 31, 2009 carrying value of $35.2 million, due primarily to sales of $13.9 million (which generated a realized capital gain of $5.1 million), partially offset by an increase in estimated fair value during the period of $2.7 million.
 
(2)   Consists primarily of residential mortgage-backed securities.
     Mortgage- and Asset-Backed Securities. At June 30, 2010, our mortgage- and asset-backed securities portfolio, which primarily includes residential mortgage-backed securities, or “RMBS,” and constituted $985.9 million of our debt securities portfolio, was backed by the following types of underlying collateral (in millions):
             
Type of Underlying Collateral   Fair Value     Average Rating
RMBS: guaranteed by FNMA or FHLMC (1)
  $ 126.0     Aaa /AAA
RMBS: guaranteed by GNMA (2)
    468.2     Aaa /AAA
RMBS: Alt A
    17.9     A1 /AA
RMBS: Sub-prime
    2.9     Aaa/AAA
RMBS: Prime and other non-RMBS (3)
    370.9     Aaa/AAA
 
         
Total
  $ 985.9     Aaa /AAA
 
         
 
(1)   “FNMA” refers to the Federal National Mortgage Association, and “FHLMC” refers to the Federal Home

36


 

    Loan Mortgage Corporation.
 
(2)   “GNMA” refers to the Government National Mortgage Association.
 
(3)   In addition to RMBS Prime, includes commercial mortgage-backed securities and other asset-backed securities.
     Municipal Bonds. The following table details the top five state exposures of our municipal bond portfolio as of June 30, 2010 (in millions):
                         
    General     Special     Total  
    Obligation     Revenue     Fair Value  
Texas
  $ 71.1     $ 18.5     $ 89.6  
Massachusetts
    8.7       60.4       69.1  
Illinois
    40.5       17.4       57.9  
New York
    4.4       50.4       54.8  
Washington
    46.2       8.8       55.0  
All other
    290.5       337.3       627.8  
 
                 
 
  $ 461.4     $ 492.8     $ 954.2  
 
                   
Advance refunded/escrowed to maturity bonds
                    181.8  
 
                     
Total municipal bond portfolio
                  $ 1,136.0  
 
                     
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
     In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or “FASB,” issued guidance that establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, or the “ASC,” as the single source of authoritative accounting principles in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP. The ASC is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. We adopted the ASC in the 2009 third quarter, and the implementation did not have any impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
     In September 2009, FASB issued guidance that allows investors to use net asset value as a practical expedient to estimate the fair value of investments in investment companies (and like entities) that do not have readily determinable fair values. This guidance does not apply to investments accounted for using the equity method. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009, with early application permitted. We adopted this guidance in the fourth quarter of 2009, and the implementation did not have any impact on our results of operations and financial condition. Our partnership investments that are accounted for as available-for-sale are subject to this guidance. Net asset value quotes from the third-party general partner of the entity in which such investments are held, which will often be based on unobservable market inputs, constitute the primary input in our determination of the fair value of such investments. The fair value of our available-for-sale partnership investments was $24.0 million at June 30, 2010 and $35.2 million at December 31, 2009.
     In June 2009, FASB issued guidance that changes the way entities account for securitizations and special-purpose entities. This guidance eliminates the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity,” changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and requires additional disclosure about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions and an entity’s continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. This guidance also changes how a company determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting rights (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entity’s purpose and design and a company’s ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. This

37


 

guidance is generally effective for interim and annual periods beginning in 2010. We adopted this guidance in the 2010 first quarter, and the implementation did not have any impact on our results of operations and financial condition. We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements outstanding at June 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009, including those that may involve the types of entities contemplated in this guidance.
     In January 2010, FASB issued guidance that provides for additional financial statement disclosure regarding fair value measurements, including how fair values are measured. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. We adopted this guidance in the 2010 first quarter, and the implementation did not have any impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
     Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and rates, such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. The primary market risk related to our non-trading financial instruments is the risk of loss associated with adverse changes in interest rates. We invest in equity securities which are subject to fluctuations in market value. We also purchase debt securities with fixed maturities that expose us to risk related to adverse changes in interest rates. We hold our equity securities and debt securities as available for sale. Any changes in the fair value in these securities, net of tax, would be reflected in our accumulated other comprehensive income as a component of stockholders’ equity. However, if a decline in fair value relative to cost is believed to be other than temporary, a loss is generally recorded on our statement of earnings.
     Debt Securities. The primary market risk for our and our subsidiaries’ debt securities is interest rate risk at the time of refinancing. We monitor the interest rate environment to evaluate refinancing opportunities. We currently do not use derivatives to manage market and interest rate risks. The tables below present sensitivity analyses of our consolidated debt securities at June 30, 2010 that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. Sensitivity analysis is defined as the measurement of potential change in future earnings, fair values, or cash flows of market sensitive instruments resulting from one or more selected hypothetical changes in interest rates over a selected time. In the sensitivity analysis model below, we use a +/- 300 basis point range of change in interest rates to measure the hypothetical change in fair value of the financial instruments included in the analysis. The change in fair value is determined by calculating hypothetical June 30, 2010 ending prices based on yields adjusted to reflect a +/- 300 basis point range of change in interest rates, comparing these hypothetical ending prices to actual ending prices, and multiplying the difference by the par outstanding.
At June 30, 2010 (dollars in millions)
                                                         
Interest rate shifts   -300     -200     -100     0     100     200     300  
     
Debt securities, fair value
  $ 3,153.8     $ 3,053.4     $ 2,956.7     $ 2,860.6     $ 2,758.8     $ 2,653.2     $ 2,550.5  
Estimated change in fair value
    293.2       192.8       96.1             (101.8 )     (207.4 )     (310.1 )
     This sensitivity analysis provides only a limited, point-in-time view of the market risk of the financial instruments discussed above. The actual impact of changes in prices and market interest rates on the financial instruments may differ significantly from those shown in the above sensitivity analysis. The sensitivity analysis is further limited because it does not consider any actions we could take in response

38


 

to actual and/or anticipated changes in prices and in interest rates.
     Partnership Investments. In addition to debt and equity securities, we invest in several partnerships which are subject to fluctuations in market value. Partnership investments are included in other invested assets and are accounted for as either available-for-sale or an equity method investment. The carrying value of available-for-sale partnership investments was $24.0 million at June 30, 2010 and $35.2 million at December 31, 2009. The carrying value of equity method partnership investments was $52.1 million at June 30, 2010 and $47.7 million at December 31, 2009.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
     We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer, or “CEO,” and our chief financial officer, or “CFO,” of the effectiveness of design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or “Exchange Act.” Based on that evaluation, our management, including our CEO and CFO, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of that date to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and timely reported as specified in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Additionally, as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, there have been no changes in internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this Form 10-Q that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
     There are no material changes from the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of our 2009 10-K. Please refer to that section for disclosures regarding what we believe are the more significant risks and uncertainties related to our businesses.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
     (c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
     The following table summarizes our common stock repurchases for the quarter ended June 30, 2010:
                                 
                            Approximate Dollar  
                    Total Number of     Value of Shares  
                    Shares Purchased as     that May Yet Be  
                    Part of Publicly     Purchased Under the  
    Total Number of     Average Price     Announced Plans     Plans  
Period   Shares Purchased (1)     Paid per Share (1)     or Programs (2)     or Programs  
April 1 to April 30
    170     $ 288.02                  
May 1 to May 31
    125,493     $ 288.80                  
June 1 to June 30
    55,143     $ 290.30                  
 
                         
 
                               
Total
    180,806     $ 289.26       180,806     $ 21,901,816  
 
                       

39


 

 
(1)   Share and average price amounts are not adjusted for the stock dividend declared in February 2010.
 
(2)   All shares represent shares repurchased pursuant to an authorization of the Board of Directors, announced in February 2008, to repurchase shares of our common stock, at such times and at prices as management may determine advisable, up to an aggregate of $300.0 million.
Item 6. Exhibits.
     
Exhibit Number   Description
31.1
  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15(d)-14(a) of the Exchange Act.
31.2
  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15(d)-14(a) of the Exchange Act.
32.1
  Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” as a part of this report on Form 10-Q.
32.2
  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” as a part of this report on Form 10-Q.
101.1
  Interactive Data Files formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009; and (iv) Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text. As provided in 406T of Regulation S-T, this Exhibit 101.1 is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and otherwise is not subject to liability under those sections.

40


 

SIGNATURE
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
  ALLEGHANY CORPORATION
Registrant
 
 
Date: August 5, 2010  By   /s/ Roger B. Gorham    
    Roger B. Gorham   
    Senior Vice President (and chief financial officer)   
 

41