ALTEROLA BIOTECH INC. - Annual Report: 2017 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the proceeding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [X] No [ ]

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. Not available

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. 114,980,000 shares as of November 30, 2018

 TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Item 1. Business

Our Business

We develop chewing gums to deliver nutraceutical/functional ingredients for applications such as appetite suppressant, cholesterol suppressant, vitamin delivery, antioxidant delivery and motion sickness suppressant.

Our plan is to market nutraceutical/functional chewing gum and in the future medicinal chewing gum. We are researching new ways to use chewing gum as a delivery system, expanding on the kinds of applications chewing gum has been used for in the past. We expected to reveal functional chewing gum for new applications by the end of 2014, but were not able to do so. We first need to raise additional capital to develop our chewing gum to deliver medicines.

Our mission is to improve the health and quality of life for millions of people all over the world who are unable to or have difficulty with swallowing tablets. As much as 40% of the adult population in America and an even greater percentage of the adolescent population have difficulties swallowing pills, and we believe our solutions will benefit them.

Presently, we are focused on nutrition and health chewing gum with natural based ingredients. The products below are currently under development and we are working to file patents to protect the ingredients in these products.

Regulatory Matters

We are subject to the laws and regulations of those jurisdictions in which we plan to sell our product, which are generally applicable to business operations, such as licensing requirements, income taxes, and payroll taxes.

Employees

We have no other employees other than our officers and directors. They oversee all responsibilities in corporate administration, business development and research. If finances permit, however, we intend to expand our current management to retain skilled directors, officers and employees with experience relevant to our business focus.

Corporate History

We were incorporated in the State of Nevada on July 21, 2008 under the name “Jedediah Resources Corp.” We are a development stage company.

After our formation, we were in the business of mineral exploration. On May 3, 2010, however, we entered into two agreements with Ola S. Juvkam-Wold (“Juvkam-Wold”), who was then our Chief Executive Officer and a director of our company: a Stock Purchase Agreement and General Release and Settlement Agreement. Pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, Mr. Juvkam-Wold agreed to cancel and return 55,000,000 shares of common stock owned by him to us for all of the issued and outstanding stock of our wholly owned subsidiary, JRE Exploration Ltd. (“JRE”), and the cancellation of all debt owed by JRE to us. Pursuant to the Release and Settlement, Mr. Juvkam-Wold released us from any and all claims Mr. Juvkam-Wold may have against us or our affiliates. Our mineral exploration business was housed in JRE, and the transaction jettisoned the business from our company. Mr. Juvkam-Wold resigned as our officer and director and Soren Nielson took his place.

On May 3, 2010, we entered into an Intellectual Property Assignment Agreement (“IP Agreement”) with Soren Nielsen pursuant to which Mr. Nielsen transferred his right, title and interest in all intellectual property relating to certain chewing gum compositions having appetite suppressant activity (the “IP”) to us for 55,000,000 newly issued shares of our common stock. Following the acquisition of the IP we changed our business direction and, during the quarterly period covered by this report, were pursuing the development of chewing gums for the delivery of Nutraceutical/functional ingredients for applications such as appetite suppressant, cholesterol suppressant, vitamin delivery, antioxidant delivery and motion sickness suppressant.

On July 9, 2010, we changed our name from “Jedediah Resources Corp.” to “Alterola Biotech Inc,” increased our authorized common stock to 140,000,000 shares and conducted a forward split of 10 for 1 of our issued and outstanding common stock.

On April 10, 2017, we entered into an Agreement of Conveyance, Transfer and Assignment of Assets (the “Agreement”) with our prior officer and director, Rene Lauritsen. Pursuant to the Agreement, we transferred all assets related to our nutraceutical chewing gum business to Mr. Lauritsen. In exchange for this assignment of assets, Mr. Lauritsen returned his 37,000,000 shares for cancellation.

Prior to resigning, Mr Lauritsen appointed Micahel Freitag as our sole officer and director and we agreed to compensate him with 37,000,000 shares of our common stock for his first six months of service.  

As of April 10, 2017, we intended to raise further capital, bring all public filings current and set about a new business direction based around a novel therapy and the intellectual property generated from our research and development activities on ethanol based intoxication.

Subsequently, on March 26, 2018, Mr. Freitag sold his control shares along with another shareholder, Krono Partners Limited, to London Pharma Holdings Limited for $200,000. This resulted in a change of control.

Also on March 26, 2018, Mr. Freitag resigned from his official positions as Director and CEO of the Company, and on the same day the shareholders of the Corporation voted Mr. Peter Maddocks as Director, and CEO.

On June 21, 2018, we signed an escrow agreement with Mr. Lauritsen to serve as our Chief Operating Officer and to contribute the IP for the company’s chewing gum business. In that agreement, we agreed to enter into an employment agreement with Mr. Lauritsen and to pay him a salary of $7,500 per month. For the IP, we agreed to compensate Mr. Lauritsen with 1,000,000 shares of our common stock and cash of $75,000. Neither the employment agreement nor the IP transfer agreement have been executed as of the date of this report.

Item 2. Properties

We do not lease or own any real property. We maintain our offices at 340 S Lemon Ave # 4041 Walnut, California 91789. Our officer and director provides this space without charge.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are not a party to any pending legal proceeding. We are not aware of any pending legal proceeding to which any of our officers, directors, or any beneficial holders of 5% or more of our voting securities are adverse to us or have a material interest adverse to us.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information

Our common stock is quoted under the symbol “ALTA” on the OTCPink operated by OTC Markets Group, Inc. 

There is currently no active trading market for our securities. There is no assurance that a regular trading market will develop, or if developed, that it will be sustained. Therefore, a shareholder may be unable to resell his securities in our company.

Penny Stock

The Securities Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in penny stocks. Penny stocks are generally equity securities with a price of less than $5.00, other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ system, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or system.  The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the Commission, that: (a) contains a description of the nature and level of risk in the market for penny stocks in both public offerings and secondary trading;(b) contains a description of the broker's or dealer's duties to the customer and of the rights and remedies available to the customer with respect to a violation to such duties or other requirements of Securities' laws; (c) contains a brief, clear, narrative description of a dealer market, including bid and ask prices for penny stocks and the significance of the spread between the bid and ask  price;(d) contains a toll-free telephone number for inquiries on disciplinary actions;(e) defines significant terms in the disclosure document or in the conduct of trading in penny stocks; and;(f) contains such other information and is in such form, including language, type, size and format, as the Commission shall require by rule or regulation.

The broker-dealer also must provide, prior to effecting any transaction in a penny stock, the customer with; (a) bid and offer quotations for the penny stock;(b) the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction; (c) the number of shares to which such bid and ask prices apply, or other comparable information relating to the depth and liquidity of the market for such stock; and (d) a monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account.

In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules; the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written acknowledgment of the receipt of a risk disclosure statement, a written agreement to transactions involving penny stocks, and a signed and dated copy of a written suitability statement.

These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the trading activity in the secondary market for our stock if it becomes subject to these penny stock rules. Therefore, because our common stock is subject to the penny stock rules, stockholders may have difficulty selling those securities.

Holders of Our Common Stock

Currently, we have approximately 48 holders of record of our common stock.

Stock Option Grants

To date, we have not granted any stock options.

Dividends

There are no restrictions in our articles of incorporation or bylaws that prevent us from declaring dividends. The Nevada Revised Statutes, however, do prohibit us from declaring dividends where after giving effect to the distribution of the dividend:

We have not declared any dividends and we do not plan to declare any dividends in the foreseeable future.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

We did not issue any securities under any equity compensation plan as of September 30, 2017.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements, other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives, and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believes,” “project,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of complying with those safe-harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse affect on our operations and future prospects on a consolidated basis include, but are not limited to: changes in economic conditions, legislative/regulatory changes, availability of capital, interest rates, competition, and generally accepted accounting principles. These risks and uncertainties should also be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Further information concerning our business, including additional factors that could materially affect our financial results, is included herein and in our other filings with the SEC.

Results of Operations for the Year Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

We generated no revenue for the period from July 21, 2008 (Date of Inception) until September 30, 2017. We do not anticipate earning revenues until such time that we are able to market and sell our products.

We had operating expenses of $49,132 for the year ended September 30, 2017, compared with $14,731 for the year ended September 30, 2016. Our operating expenses for the year ended September 30, 2017 consisted of stock based compensation of $37,000, legal fees of $8,208, amortization of $2,583, general and administrative expenses of $341 and accounting and audit fees of $1,000. Our operating expenses for the year ended September 30, 2016 consisted legal fees of $7,813, accounting and audit fees of $1,500, amortization of $3,100 and general and administrative expenses of $2,318.

We anticipate our operating expenses will increase as we implement our business plan.

We had other expenses consisting of $18,500 for the year ended September 30, 2017, which consisted of interest expense, compared with other expenses of $7,846 for the year ended September 30, 2016, which consisted of interest expense of $18,019 offset by $10,173 in the forgiveness of debt.

During the year ended September 30, 2016, we negotiated a settlement of certain legal expenses, in which $10,173 of accrued invoices was forgiven. We do not expect to achieve other income in future quarters.

We recorded a net loss of $67,632 for the year ended September 30, 2017, compared with $22,577 for the year ended September 30, 2016.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of September 30, 2017, we had $0 in current assets and currently liabilities of $294,678. We had a working capital deficit of $294,678 as of September 30, 2017.

Operating activities used $0 in cash for the year September 30, 2017, compared with $27,631 in cash for the year ended September 30, 2016. Our negative operating cash flow for the year ended September 30, 2016 was mainly attributable to a decrease in accrued expenses and funding the loss for the year, offset mainly by an increase in accrued interest.

Financing activities provided $0 for the year ended September 30, 2017, compared with $25,000 for the year ended September 30, 2016 when on December 10, 2015, we entered into a $25,000 Demand Promissory Note with an outside investor. Under the terms of the note, simple interest is at 10% and all principal and interest is due on demand.

Based upon our current financial condition, we do not have sufficient cash to operate our business at the current level for the next 12 months. We intend to fund operations through increased sales and debt and/or equity financing arrangements, which may be insufficient to fund expenditures or other cash requirements. We plan to seek additional financing in a private equity offering to secure funding for operations. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in raising additional funding. If we are not able to secure additional funding, the implementation of our business plan will be impaired. There can be no assurance that such additional financing will be available to us on acceptable terms or at all.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09 "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" (Topic 606). Under this guidance, revenue is recognized when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for those goods or services. The updated standard will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective and permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. Early adoption is not permitted. The updated standard will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on its financial statements and related.

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The guidance in ASU 2016-02 supersedes the lease recognition requirements in ASC Topic 840, Leases (FAS 13). ASU 2016-02 requires an entity to recognize assets and liabilities arising from a lease for both financing and operating leases, along with additional qualitative and quantitative disclosures. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect this standard will have on its financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The standard should be applied prospectively on or after the effective date. The Company will evaluate the impact of adopting this standard prospectively upon any transactions of acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The guidance removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. A goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its FV, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. The guidance should be adopted on a prospective basis for the annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this ASU on its financial statements.

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, “Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting,” which simplifies the accounting for share-based payments granted to nonemployees for goods and services and aligns most of the guidance on such payments to nonemployees with the requirements for share-based payments granted to employees. ASU 2018-07 becomes effective for the Company on January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have an impact on the Company's financial statements.

We do not expect the adoption of any recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a significant impact on our results of operations, financial position or cash flow.

Going Concern

We have negative working capital, have incurred losses since inception, and have not yet received revenues from sales of products or services. These factors create substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustment that might be necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern.

Our ability to continue as a going concern depends on our generating cash from the sale of our common stock and/or obtaining debt financing and attaining future profitable operations. Management’s plans include selling our equity securities and obtaining debt financing to fund our capital requirement and ongoing operations; however, there can be no assurance we will be successful in these efforts.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of September 30, 2017, there were no off balance sheet arrangements.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Index to Financial Statements Required by Article 8 of Regulation S-X:

Audited Financial Statements:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To Shareholders and the Board of Directors of

Alterola Biotech Inc.

Opinion on the financial statements

We audited the accompanying balance sheets of Alterola Biotech Inc. (“the Company”) as of September 30, 2017 and 2016, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended September 30, 2016 and the related notes (collectively referred to as “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of September 30, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended September 30, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis of Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

The accompanying financial statements were prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 7 to the financial statements, the Company has negative working capital, has incurred losses since inception, and has not received revenues from sales of products or services. These conditions raise a substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2018.

/s/

MJF & Associates
Los Angeles, California
December 1, 2018

ALTEROLA BIOTECH, INC.

BALANCE SHEETS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 AND 2016

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

ALTEROLA BIOTECH, INC.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 AND 2016

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

ALTEROLA BIOTECH, INC.

STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 AND 2016

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

ALTEROLA BIOTECH, INC.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 AND 2016

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

ALTEROLA BIOTECH, INC.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 AND 2016

NOTE 1 – NATURE OF BUSINESS

Alterola Biotech, Inc. (“Alterola” or the “Company”) is a development stage company and was incorporated in Nevada on July 21, 2008. The Company was formed to acquire exploration and development stage mineral properties.

On October 1, 2008, the Company incorporated JRE Exploration Ltd, (“JRE”) a wholly owned subsidiary in Canada to hold its Canadian mineral claims.

In April 2017, the Company entered into an assignment with its director to convey all assets and intellectual property to its former director for the cancellation of 37,000,000 shares of the Company

.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Accounting Basis

The Company uses the accrual basis of accounting and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).  The Company has a September 30 fiscal year end.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Equivalents

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers highly liquid financial instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

ALTEROLA BIOTECH, INC.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 AND 2016

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Intellectual Property

The Company does not amortize intangible assets with indefinite useful lives, rather such assets are tested for impairment at least annually or sooner whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the assets may be impaired. The Company amortizes its intangible assets with definite lives over their estimated useful lives and reviews these assets for impairment. The Company will amortize its acquired intangible assets with definite lives over the estimated economic life of the completed product.

Website Development Costs

Costs incurred in developing and maintaining a website are charged to expense when incurred for the planning, content population, and administration or maintenance of the website. All development costs for the application, infrastructure, and graphics development are capitalized and subsequently reported at the lower of unamortized cost or net realizable value. Capitalized costs are amortized using straight-line basis over two years, the estimated economic life of the completed website.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Alterola’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accrued expenses, accrued interest and notes payable. The carrying amount of these financial instruments approximates fair value (“FV”) due either to length of maturity or interest rates that approximate prevailing market rates unless otherwise disclosed in these financial statements.

FV is defined as the price that would be received upon sale of an asset or paid upon transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date and in the principal or most advantageous market for that asset or liability. The FV should be calculated based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, not on assumptions specific to the entity. In addition, the FV of liabilities should include consideration of non-performance risk including our own credit risk.

In addition to defining FV, the disclosure requirements around FV establish a FVhierarchy for valuation inputs which is expanded. The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three levels based on the extent to which inputs used in measuring FV are observable in the market. Each FV measurement is reported in one of the three levels which is determined by the lowest level input that is significant to the FV measurement in its entirety. These levels are:

Level 1 – inputs are based upon unadjusted quoted prices for identical instruments traded in active markets.

Level 2 – inputs are based upon significant observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.

ALTEROLA BIOTECH, INC.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 AND 2016

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

Level 3 – inputs are generally unobservable and typically reflect management’s estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The FVs are therefore determined using model-based techniques that include option pricing models, discounted cash flow models, and similar techniques.

The carrying value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities which consist of cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and notes payable are valued using level 1 inputs. The Company believes that the recorded values approximate their FV due to the short maturity of such instruments. Unless otherwise noted, it is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest, exchange or credit risks arising from these financial instruments.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are computed using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the currently enacted tax rates and laws. A valuation allowance is provided for the amount of deferred tax assets that, based on available evidence, are not expected to be realized.

Revenue Recognition

The Company will recognize revenue when products are fully delivered or services have been provided and collection is reasonably assured.

Loss Per Common Share

Basic loss per share is calculated using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each reporting period. Diluted loss per share includes potentially dilutive securities such as outstanding options and warrants, using various methods such as the treasury stock or modified treasury stock method in the determination of dilutive shares outstanding during each reporting period. The Company does not have any potentially dilutive instruments.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation is accounted for at fair value in accordance with ASC Topic 718. To date, the Company has not adopted a stock option plan and has not granted any stock options.

During the year ended September 30, 2013, the Company issued 37,000,000 shares of common stock to its director.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09 "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" (Topic 606). Under this guidance, revenue is recognized when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for those goods or services. The updated standard will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective and permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. Early adoption is not permitted. The updated standard will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on its financial statements and related.

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The guidance in ASU 2016-02 supersedes the lease recognition requirements in ASC Topic 840, Leases (FAS 13). ASU 2016-02 requires an entity to recognize assets and liabilities arising `1rom a lease for both financing and operating leases, along with additional qualitative and quantitative disclosures. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect this standard will have on its financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses.

ALTEROLA BIOTECH, INC.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 AND 2016

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)

The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The ASU should be applied prospectively on or after the effective date. The Company will evaluate the impact of adopting this ASU prospectively upon any transactions of acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The guidance removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. A goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its FV, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. The guidance should be adopted on a prospective basis for the annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this ASU on its financial statements.

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, “Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting,” which simplifies the accounting for share-based payments granted to nonemployees for goods and services and aligns most of the guidance on such payments to nonemployees with the requirements for share-based payments granted to employees. ASU 2018-07 becomes effective for the Company on January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have an impact on the Company's financial statements.

Alterola has reviewed recent accounting pronouncements issued to the date of the issuance of these financial statements, and we do not believe any of these pronouncements will have a material impact on the Company.

NOTE 3 – ACCRUED EXPENSES

Accrued expenses consisted of the following at September 30, 2017 and 2016:

ALTEROLA BIOTECH, INC.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 AND 2016

NOTE 4 – NOTES PAYABLE

Notes payable consisted of the following at September 30, 2017 and 2016:

The Convertible note is convertible at the option of the holder. The number of shares of common stock into which the convertible note will be converted is determined by the Fair Market Price (“FMV”) of the common stock at the date of conversion. In the event there is no determinable market price the FMV shall be:

a) The share price at the last private offering of the common stock, or, b) the 30 day moving average of the Common Stock in the event a public listing of the common stock has taken place.

Notes payable of $130,000 are currently in default as of the date of issuance of these financial statements.

NOTE 5 – CAPITAL STOCK

The Company has 140,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock authorized and 10,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value preferred stock authorized.

On April 10, 2017, a former director of the Company surrendered for voluntary cancellation, 37,000,000 shares of common stock with a deemed value of $37,000.

On April 10, 2017, the Company issued 37,000,000 shares of common stock to its director for services with a deemed value of $37,000.

The Company has 114,980,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2017 and 2016 respectively. There are no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2017 and 2016.

ALTEROLA BIOTECH, INC.

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 AND 2016

NOTE 6 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Alterola neither owns nor leases any real or personal property. An officer has provided office space to Alterola without charge. There is no obligation for the officer to continue this arrangement. Such costs are immaterial to the financial statements and accordingly are not reflected herein. The officers and directors are involved in other business activities and most likely will become involved in other business activities in the future.

NOTE 7 – LIQUIDITY & GOING CONCERN

Alterola has negative working capital, has incurred losses since inception, and has not received revenues from sales of products or services. These factors create substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustment that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

The ability of Alterola to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company generating cash from the sale of its common stock and/or obtaining debt financing and attaining future profitable operations. Management’s plans include selling its equity securities and obtaining debt financing to fund its capital requirement and ongoing operations; however, there can be no assurance the Company will be successful in these efforts.

NOTE 8 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In accordance with ASC Topic 855-10, the Company has analyzed its operations subsequent to September 30, 2017 to the date these financial statements were issued, and has determined it does not have any material subsequent events to disclose in these financial statements.

Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

On June 8, 2017, KLJ & Associates, LLP resigned as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and on June 9, 2018, the Company engaged MJF & Associates (the “New Accountant”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The engagement of the New Accountant was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we have carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, being September 30, 2017. This evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our company’s reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Based upon that evaluation, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (“ICFR”) (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Management has assessed the effectiveness of our ICFR as of September 30, 2017 based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. As a result of this assessment, management concluded that, as of September 30, 2017, our ICFR was not effective. Our management identified the following material weaknesses in our ICFR, which are indicative of many small companies with small staff: (i) inadequate segregation of duties and effective risk assessment; and (ii) insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of both US GAAP and SEC guidelines.

We plan to take steps to enhance and improve the design of our ICFR. During the period covered by this annual report on Form 10-K, we have not been able to remediate the material weaknesses identified above. To remediate such weaknesses, we hope to implement the following changes during our fiscal year ending September 30, 2018: (i) appoint additional qualified personnel to address inadequate segregation of duties and ineffective risk management; and (ii) adopt sufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting. The remediation efforts set out in (i) and (ii) are largely dependent upon our securing additional financing to cover the costs of implementing the changes required. If we are unsuccessful in securing such funds, remediation efforts may be adversely affected in a material manner.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding ICFR. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to an exemption for non-accelerated filers set forth in Section 989G of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

Remediation of Material Weakness

We are unable to remedy our controls related to the inadequate segregation of duties and ineffective risk management until we receive financing to hire additional employees. We are currently in the process of hiring an outsourced controller to improve the controls for accounting and financial reporting.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Internal Controls

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our ICFR are or will be capable of preventing or detecting all errors or all fraud. Any control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements, due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns may occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk.

Item 9B. Other Information

None

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The following information sets forth the names, ages, and positions of our current directors and executive officers.

Set forth below is a brief description of the background and business experience of each of our current executive officers and directors.

Peter Maddocks is our newly appointed Chief Excecutive Officer and Director. Mr. Maddocks is a Chartered Accountant who brings decades of executive corporate financial experience to the Company. He has held positions at KPMG, was a senior financial controller with Citi Bank Private Banking in London, Citi Bank Italy and Citi Bank Venture Capital Emerging Markets Group. Mr. Maddocks is well versed in public company corporate affairs, holding Directorships in several publicly traded companies in the US as well as the UK.

Rene Lauritsen is our newly appointed Chief Operating Officer. Rene Lauritsen holds degrees in business administration from Aarhus Business School and IT-administration from Niels Brock Copenhagen Business School and since graduation he has spent 15 years owning, running and working as an independent business consultant at Capital Nordic Limited. Mr Lauritsen area of expertise is working in the information technology field and he has spent this time focusing on helping early and mid-stage companies meet their objectives.

Term of Office

Our directors are appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual general meeting of our shareholders or until removed from office in accordance with our bylaws. Our officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until removed by the board.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between or among the directors, executive officers or persons nominated or chosen by us to become directors or executive officers.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

During the past 10 years, none of our current directors, nominees for directors or current executive officers has been involved in any legal proceeding identified in Item 401(f) of Regulation S-K, including:

1. Any petition under the Federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer was appointed by a court for the business or property of such person, or any partnership in which he or she was a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which he or she was an executive officer at or within two years before the time of such filing;

2. Any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being named a subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

3. Being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him or her from, or otherwise limiting, the following activities:

i. Acting as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of any of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director or employee of any investment company, bank, savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing any conduct or practice in connection with such activity;

ii. Engaging in any type of business practice; or

iii. Engaging in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of Federal or State securities laws or Federal commodities laws;

4. Being subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any Federal or State authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any type of business regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission “CFTC”, securities, investment, insurance or banking activities, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;

5. Being found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the SEC to have violated any Federal or State securities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended, or vacated;

6. Being found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the CFTC to have violated any Federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the CFTC has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated;

7. Being subject to, or a party to, any Federal or State judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of:

i. Any Federal or State securities or commodities law or regulation; or

ii. Any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order; or

iii. Any law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or

8. Being subject to, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26))), any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29))), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

Committees of the Board

Our company currently does not have nominating, compensation or audit committees or committees performing similar functions nor does our company have a written nominating, compensation or audit committee charter. Our directors believe that it is not necessary to have such committees, at this time, because the functions of such committees can be adequately performed by the board of directors.

Our company does not have any defined policy or procedural requirements for shareholders to submit recommendations or nominations for directors. The board of directors believes that, given the stage of our development, a specific nominating policy would be premature and of little assistance until our business operations develop to a more advanced level. Our company does not currently have any specific or minimum criteria for the election of nominees to the board of directors and we do not have any specific process or procedure for evaluating such nominees. The board of directors will assess all candidates, whether submitted by management or shareholders, and make recommendations for election or appointment.

A shareholder who wishes to communicate with our board of directors may do so by directing a written request addressed to our CEO and director, Peter Maddocks, at the address appearing on the first page of this annual report.

Code of Ethics

We have not adopted a Code of Ethics that applies our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The table below summarizes all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our executive officer for all services rendered in all capacities to us for the years ended September 30, 2017 and 2016.

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table 

On June 21, 2018, we signed an escrow agreement with Mr. Lauritsen to serve as our Chief Operating Officer and to contribute the IP for the Company’s chewing gum business. In that agreement, we have agreed to enter into an employment agreement with Mr. Lauritsen and to pay him a salary of $7,500 per month. For the IP, we have agreed to compensate Mr. Lauritsen with 1,000,000 shares of our common stock and cash of $75,000. Neither the employment agreement nor the IP transfer agreement have been executed as of the date of this report.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The table below summarizes all unexercised options, stock that has not vested, and equity incentive plan awards for each named executive officer as of September 30, 2017.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The following table sets forth, as of  November 30, 2018, certain information as to shares of our common stock owned by (i) each person known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, (ii) each of our directors, and (iii) all of our executive officers and directors as a group:

 Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Other than described below or the transactions described under the heading “Executive Compensation” (or with respect to which such information is omitted in accordance with SEC regulations), there have not been, and there is not currently proposed, any transaction or series of similar transactions to which we were or will be a participant in which the amount involved exceeded or will exceed the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at year-end for the last two completed fiscal years, and in which any director, executive officer, holder of 5% or more of any class of our capital stock or any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons had or will have a direct or indirect material interest.

On June 21, 2018, we signed an escrow agreement with Mr. Lauritsen to serve as our Chief Operating Officer and to contribute the IP for the company’s chewing gum business. In that agreement, we have agreed to enter into an employment agreement with Mr. Lauritsen and to pay him a salary of $7,500 per month. For the IP, we have agreed to compensate Mr. Lauritsen with 1,000,000 shares of our common stock and cash of $75,000. Neither the employment agreement nor the IP transfer agreement have been executed as of the date of this report.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services  

Below is the table of Audit Fees billed by our auditors in connection with the audits of the Company’s annual financial statements for the years ended:

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules

The following financial statements and schedules listed below are included in this Form 10-K.

Financial Statements (See Item 8)

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Alterola Biotech, Inc.

By: /s/ Peter Maddocks

Peter Maddocks

President, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer,

Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer,

Principal Accounting Officer, and Director

December 17, 2018

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By: /s/ Peter Maddocks

Peter Maddocks

President, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer,

Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer,

Principal Accounting Officer, and Director

December 17, 2018