Altisource Asset Management Corp - Quarter Report: 2015 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2015
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR TRANSITION PERIOD FROM __________ TO __________
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 000-54809
Altisource Asset Management Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
UNITED STATES VIRGIN ISLANDS | 66-0783125 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
36C Strand Street
Christiansted, United States Virgin Islands 00820
(Address of principal executive office)
(340) 692-1055
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer | x | Accelerated Filer | o | |
Non-Accelerated Filer | o | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller Reporting Company | o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
As of April 30, 2015, 2,228,823 shares of our common stock were outstanding (excluding 266,429 shares held as treasury stock).
Altisource Asset Management Corporation
March 31, 2015
Table of Contents
i
References in this report to "we," "our," "us," or the "Company" refer to Altisource Asset Management Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated. References in this report to “Residential” refer to Altisource Residential Corporation, unless otherwise indicated. References in this report to “Altisource” refer to Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.A. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated. References in this report to “Ocwen” refer to Ocwen Financial Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated.
Special note on forward-looking statements
Our disclosure and analysis in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which we refer to as the “Securities Act,” and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which we refer to as the “Exchange Act.” In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” or “potential” or the negative of these words and phrases or similar words or phrases which are predictions of or indicate future events or trends and which do not relate solely to historical matters. You can also identify forward-looking statements by discussions of strategy, plans or intentions.
The forward-looking statements contained in this report reflect our current views about future events and are subject to numerous known and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and changes in circumstances that may cause our actual results to differ significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking statement. Factors that may materially affect such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
• | our ability to implement our business strategy and the business strategy of Residential; |
• | our ability to retain Residential as a client; |
• | our ability to retain and maintain our strategic relationships with related parties; |
• | the ability of Residential to generate cash available for distribution to its stockholders under our management; |
• | our ability to effectively compete with our competitors; |
• | Residential's ability to complete future or pending transactions; |
• | the failure of Altisource to effectively perform its obligations under their agreements with us and Residential; |
• | the failure of Residential’s mortgage loan servicers to effectively perform their services to Residential; |
• | general economic and market conditions; and |
• | governmental regulations, taxes and policies. |
While forward-looking statements reflect our good faith beliefs, assumptions and expectations, they are not guarantees of future performance. Such forward-looking statements speak only as of their respective dates, and we assume no obligation to update them to reflect changes in underlying assumptions or factors, new information or otherwise. For a further discussion of these and other factors that could cause our future results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements, please see the risk factors set forth in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.
ii
Part I
Item 1. Financial statements (unaudited)
Certain information contained herein is presented as of April 30, 2015, which we have concluded is the latest practicable date for financial information prior to the filing of this quarterly report.
1
Altisource Asset Management Corporation
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
March 31, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | ||||||
Assets: | |||||||
Real estate held for use: | |||||||
Land (from consolidated VIE) | $ | 21,267 | $ | 14,424 | |||
Rental residential properties (net of accumulated depreciation of $2,046 and $1,062, respectively - from consolidated VIE) | 86,206 | 60,908 | |||||
Real estate owned (from consolidated VIE) | 456,479 | 457,045 | |||||
Total real estate held for use, net | 563,952 | 532,377 | |||||
Real estate assets held for sale (from consolidated VIE) | 150,807 | 92,230 | |||||
Mortgage loans at fair value (from consolidated VIE) | 1,853,495 | 1,959,044 | |||||
Mortgage loans held for sale (from consolidated VIE) | 12,485 | 12,535 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents (including from consolidated VIE $53,246 and $66,166, respectively) | 98,386 | 116,782 | |||||
Restricted cash (from consolidated VIE) | 14,766 | 13,282 | |||||
Accounts receivable (including from consolidated VIE $10,398 and $10,313, respectively) | 10,399 | 11,068 | |||||
Related party receivables (from consolidated VIE) | 22,530 | 17,491 | |||||
Deferred leasing and financing costs, net (from consolidated VIE) | 5,384 | 4,251 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets (including from consolidated VIE $672 and $373, respectively) | 2,261 | 1,638 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 2,734,465 | $ | 2,760,698 | |||
Liabilities: | |||||||
Repurchase agreements (from consolidated VIE) | $ | 929,287 | $ | 1,015,000 | |||
Other secured borrowings (from consolidated VIE) | 364,849 | 324,082 | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (including from consolidated VIE $42,686 and $11,678, respectively) | 48,314 | 16,726 | |||||
Related party payables (including from consolidated VIE $5,782 and $4,879, respectively) | 9,092 | 6,169 | |||||
Total liabilities | 1,351,542 | 1,361,977 | |||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6) | |||||||
Redeemable preferred stock: | |||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 250,000 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014; redemption value $250,000 | 248,979 | 248,927 | |||||
Equity: | |||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value, 5,000,000 authorized shares; 2,470,783 and 2,206,652 shares issued and outstanding, respectively as of March 31, 2015 and 2,452,101 and 2,188,136 shares issued and outstanding, respectively, as of December 31, 2014 | 25 | 25 | |||||
Additional paid-in capital | 15,048 | 14,152 | |||||
Retained earnings | 61,009 | 54,174 | |||||
Treasury stock, at cost, 264,131 shares as of March 31, 2015 and 263,965 shares as of December 31, 2014 | (245,519 | ) | (245,468 | ) | |||
Total stockholders' equity | (169,437 | ) | (177,117 | ) | |||
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated affiliate | 1,303,381 | 1,326,911 | |||||
Total equity | 1,133,944 | 1,149,794 | |||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 2,734,465 | $ | 2,760,698 |
See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
2
Altisource Asset Management Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three months ended March 31, 2015 | Three months ended March 31, 2014 | |||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||
Rental revenues | $ | 1,400 | $ | 69 | ||||
Net unrealized gain on mortgage loans | 61,134 | 65,130 | ||||||
Net realized gain on mortgage loans | 15,382 | 9,321 | ||||||
Net realized gain on re-performing mortgage loans | 151 | — | ||||||
Net realized gain on real estate | 10,608 | — | ||||||
Interest income | 240 | 108 | ||||||
Total revenues | 88,915 | 74,628 | ||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||
Residential property operating expenses | 12,459 | 1,050 | ||||||
Real estate depreciation and amortization | 998 | 48 | ||||||
Real estate selling costs and impairment | 14,691 | 354 | ||||||
Mortgage loan servicing costs | 18,266 | 11,437 | ||||||
Interest expense | 11,483 | 5,708 | ||||||
General and administrative | 10,790 | 5,601 | ||||||
Related party general and administrative | 773 | 923 | ||||||
Total expenses | 69,460 | 25,121 | ||||||
Income before income taxes | 19,455 | 49,507 | ||||||
Income tax expense | 143 | 766 | ||||||
Net income | 19,312 | 48,741 | ||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in consolidated affiliate | (12,424 | ) | (41,913 | ) | ||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders | $ | 6,888 | $ | 6,828 | ||||
Earnings per share of common stock – basic: | ||||||||
Earnings per basic share | $ | 3.10 | $ | 2.88 | ||||
Weighted average common stock outstanding – basic | 2,203,699 | 2,367,202 | ||||||
Earnings per share of common stock – diluted: | ||||||||
Earnings per diluted share | $ | 2.50 | $ | 2.39 | ||||
Weighted average common stock outstanding – diluted | 2,757,206 | 2,856,079 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
Altisource Asset Management Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Equity
(In thousands, except share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Common stock | ||||||||||||||||||||
Number of shares | Amount | Additional paid-in capital | Retained earnings | Treasury stock | Noncontrolling interest in consolidated affiliate | Total equity | ||||||||||||||
December 31, 2014 | 2,452,101 | $ | 25 | $ | 14,152 | $ | 54,174 | $ | (245,468 | ) | $ | 1,326,911 | $ | 1,149,794 | ||||||
Issuance of common stock, including option exercises | 18,682 | — | 7 | — | — | — | 7 | |||||||||||||
Treasury shares repurchased | — | — | — | — | (51 | ) | — | (51 | ) | |||||||||||
Capital contribution from noncontrolling interest | — | — | — | — | — | 27 | 27 | |||||||||||||
Distribution from noncontrolling interest | — | — | — | — | — | (36,038 | ) | (36,038 | ) | |||||||||||
Amortization of preferred stock issuance costs | — | — | — | (53 | ) | — | — | (53 | ) | |||||||||||
Share-based compensation | — | — | 889 | — | — | 57 | 946 | |||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | 6,888 | — | 12,424 | 19,312 | |||||||||||||
March 31, 2015 | 2,470,783 | $ | 25 | $ | 15,048 | $ | 61,009 | $ | (245,519 | ) | $ | 1,303,381 | $ | 1,133,944 |
Common stock | ||||||||||||||||||||
Number of shares | Amount | Additional paid-in capital | Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) | Treasury stock | Noncontrolling interest in consolidated affiliate | Total equity | ||||||||||||||
December 31, 2013 | 2,354,774 | $ | 24 | $ | 12,855 | $ | (5,339 | ) | $ | — | $ | 785,427 | $ | 792,967 | ||||||
Issuance of common stock, including option exercises | 41,429 | — | 18 | — | — | — | 18 | |||||||||||||
Treasury shares repurchased | (44,565 | ) | (44,565 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Capital contribution from noncontrolling interest | — | — | — | — | — | 468,491 | 468,491 | |||||||||||||
Distribution from noncontrolling interest | (27,398 | ) | (27,398 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation | — | — | 3,316 | — | — | — | 3,316 | |||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | 6,828 | — | 41,913 | 48,741 | |||||||||||||
March 31, 2014 | 2,396,203 | $ | 24 | $ | 16,189 | $ | 1,489 | $ | (44,565 | ) | $ | 1,268,433 | $ | 1,241,570 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Altisource Asset Management Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands) (Unaudited)
Three months ended March 31, 2015 | Three months ended March 31, 2014 | ||||||
Operating activities: | |||||||
Net income | $ | 19,312 | $ | 48,741 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities: | |||||||
Net unrealized gain on mortgage loans | (61,134 | ) | (65,130 | ) | |||
Net realized gain on mortgage loans | (15,382 | ) | (9,321 | ) | |||
Net realized gain on sale of re-performing mortgage loans | (151 | ) | — | ||||
Net realized gain on sale of real estate | (10,608 | ) | (55 | ) | |||
Real estate depreciation and amortization | 998 | 48 | |||||
Real estate selling costs and impairment | 14,691 | 355 | |||||
Accretion of interest on re-performing mortgage loans | (232 | ) | — | ||||
Share-based compensation | 946 | 3,316 | |||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs | 531 | 608 | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |||||||
Accounts receivable | 1,750 | 502 | |||||
Related party receivables | (2,535 | ) | (53 | ) | |||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | (623 | ) | (530 | ) | |||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 1,613 | 1,118 | |||||
Related party payables | 2,923 | 871 | |||||
Net cash used in operating activities | (47,901 | ) | (19,530 | ) | |||
Investing activities: | |||||||
Investment in mortgage loans | — | (611,357 | ) | ||||
Investment in renovations | (5,534 | ) | (447 | ) | |||
Real estate tax advances | (6,556 | ) | (6,259 | ) | |||
Mortgage loan dispositions | 56,337 | 32,775 | |||||
Mortgage loan payments | 5,816 | 3,129 | |||||
Disposition of real estate | 32,139 | 734 | |||||
Change in restricted cash | (1,484 | ) | (1,456 | ) | |||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 80,718 | (582,881 | ) | ||||
Financing activities: | |||||||
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock | — | 250,000 | |||||
Cost of issuance of preferred stock | — | (1,114 | ) | ||||
Issuance of common stock, including stock option exercises | 411 | 2,732 | |||||
Repurchase of common stock | (51 | ) | (44,565 | ) | |||
Payment of tax withholdings on exercise of stock options | (404 | ) | (2,714 | ) | |||
Capital contribution from noncontrolling interest | 27 | 468,491 | |||||
Distribution to noncontrolling interest | (4,576 | ) | (27,398 | ) | |||
Proceeds from issuance of other secured debt | 50,690 | — | |||||
Repayments of secured notes | (9,256 | ) | — | ||||
Proceeds from repurchase agreement | 33,877 | 127,664 | |||||
Repayments of repurchase agreement | (119,590 | ) | (30,096 | ) | |||
Payment of deferred financing costs | (2,341 | ) | (123 | ) | |||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (51,213 | ) | 742,877 | ||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (18,396 | ) | 140,466 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents as of beginning of the period | 116,782 | 140,000 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents as of end of the period | $ | 98,386 | $ | 280,466 | |||
5
Altisource Asset Management Corporation Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued) (In thousands) (Unaudited) | |||||||
Three months ended March 31, 2015 | Three months ended March 31, 2014 | ||||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information | |||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 10,429 | $ | 4,736 | |||
Transfer of mortgage loans to real estate owned | 136,182 | 96,528 | |||||
Transfer of real estate owned to mortgage loans | 1,356 | — | |||||
Change in accrued capital expenditures | (1,430 | ) | — | ||||
Change in accrued equity issuance costs | — | 183 | |||||
Changes in receivables from mortgage loan dispositions, payments and real estate tax advances, net | 2,848 | 1,247 | |||||
Changes in receivables from real estate owned dispositions | 630 | — |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
Altisource Asset Management Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2015
(Unaudited)
1. Organization and basis of presentation
We were incorporated in the United States Virgin Islands on March 15, 2012, which we refer to as “inception.” Subsequent to our separation from Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.A. ("Altisource") on December 21, 2012, we immediately commenced operations. In October 2013, we applied for and were granted registration by the SEC as a registered investment adviser under section 203(c) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. Our primary business is to provide asset management and certain corporate governance services to Altisource Residential Corporation, which we refer to as “Residential.” Residential is a Maryland corporation that acquires and manages single-family rental properties by acquiring sub-performing and non-performing mortgages throughout the United States.
Residential is currently our primary source of revenue and will drive our results. On March 31, 2015, we entered into a new asset management agreement with Residential (the “AMA”) with an effective date of April 1, 2015. Prior to the AMA, we were party to an asset management agreement with Residential (the “Original AMA”) pursuant to which we received incentive fees, which we refer to as our “incentive management fees,” that gave us a share of Residential’s cash flow available for distribution to its stockholders as well as reimbursement for certain overhead and operating expenses. Although the new AMA provides for a new fee structure in which we are entitled to a base management fee, an incentive management fee and a conversion fee for properties that become rental properties during each quarter, our operating results are highly dependent on Residential's ability to achieve positive operating results. For additional details on the new AMA, please see “Note 7. Related Party Transactions.”
We have concluded that Residential is a variable interest entity (“VIE”) because Residential’s equity holders lack the ability through voting rights to make decisions about Residential’s activities that have a significant effect on the success of Residential. We have also concluded that we are the primary beneficiary of Residential because under the Residential AMA we have the power to direct the activities of Residential that most significantly impact Residential’s economic performance including establishing Residential’s investment and business strategy. As a result, we consolidate Residential in our consolidated financial statements.
Additionally, we provide management services to NewSource Reinsurance Company Ltd., which we refer to as “NewSource,” a title insurance and reinsurance company in Bermuda. In October 2013, we invested $2.0 million in 100% of the common stock of NewSource and Residential invested $18.0 million in the non-voting preferred stock of NewSource. On December 2, 2013, NewSource became registered as a licensed reinsurer with the Bermuda Monetary Authority (“BMA”). Because we own 100% of voting common stock of NewSource and there are no substantive kick-out rights granted to other equity owners, we consolidate NewSource in our consolidated financial statements. NewSource commenced reinsurance activities during the second quarter of 2014. In December 2014, NewSource determined that the economics of the initial business did not warrant the continuation of its initial reinsurance quota share agreement with an unrelated third party. NewSource therefore transferred all of the risk of claims and future losses underwritten to an unrelated third party.
Since Residential commenced operations, it has completed three public equity offerings with aggregate net proceeds of approximately $1.1 billion. Residential also entered into three separate repurchase agreements to finance the acquisition and ownership of residential mortgage loans and REO properties. The maximum aggregate funding available under these repurchase agreements at December 31, 2014 was $1.2 billion. Following the amendments described below, the maximum aggregate funding available to Residential under these repurchase agreements as of March 31, 2015 was $970.5 million, subject to certain sublimits, eligibility requirements and conditions precedent to each funding. As of March 31, 2015, an aggregate of $929.3 million was outstanding under Residential's repurchase agreements. All obligations of Residential’s subsidiaries under the repurchase agreements are fully guaranteed by Residential.
Each of Residential's repurchase agreements is described below:
• | Credit Suisse (“CS”) is the lender on the repurchase agreement entered into on March 22, 2013 (the “CS repurchase agreement”) with an initial aggregate maximum borrowing capacity of $100.0 million. During 2014 the CS repurchase agreement was amended on several occasions, ultimately increasing the aggregate maximum borrowing capacity to $225.0 million on December 31, 2014 with a maturity date of April 20, 2015, subject to an additional one-year extension with the approval of the lender. On April 20, 2015, Residential entered into an amended and restated repurchase agreement with CS that increased the aggregate borrowing capacity from $225.0 million to $275.0 million, |
7
increased the REO sublimit under the facility and extended the maturity date to April 18, 2016. Please see “Note 12. Subsequent Events” for additional information.
• | Deutsche Bank (“DB”) is the lender on the repurchase agreement entered into on September 12, 2013 (the “DB repurchase agreement”). The DB repurchase agreement was amended on December 18, 2013, has an aggregate funding capacity of $250.0 million and matures on March 11, 2016. The DB repurchase agreement includes a provision that, beginning in April 2015, Residential will not be able to finance mortgage loans in excess of amounts outstanding under the facility at the end of March 2015. Therefore, Residential's aggregate funding capacity under the DB repurchase agreement was reduced to $219.7 million in April 2015, which was the amount outstanding under the facility at the time. |
• | Wells Fargo (“Wells”) is the lender on the repurchase agreement entered into on September 23, 2013 (the “Wells repurchase agreement”) with an initial aggregate maximum borrowing capacity of $200.0 million. Throughout 2013 and 2014 the Wells repurchase agreement was amended several times increasing the aggregate maximum borrowing capacity to a high of $1.0 billion, and on December 31, 2014 was reduced to $750.0 million, subject to certain sublimits, to reflect the securitization of a significant portion of Residential's non-performing loans that previously had been financed under the Wells repurchase agreement. The maturity date of the Wells repurchase agreement was March 23, 2015. However, on February 20, 2015, Residential exercised its option to extend the termination date of this facility to March 23, 2016 without any additional funding, thereby reducing Residential's aggregate funding capacity under the Wells repurchase agreement to $525.8 million which was the amount outstanding under the facility on the extension date. Residential is in discussions with Wells to further extend the repurchase agreement with an ability to obtain additional funding. No assurance can be provided that Residential will be able to renew this facility on reasonable terms, on a timely basis or at all. In the event Residential cannot extend the agreement with an ability to obtain additional funding, the advance rate will be reduced by 10% after the first 90 days of the extension term and Residential will not be entitled to draw additional funds under the facility. |
On November 25, 2014, Residential completed a securitization transaction in which ARLP Securitization Trust, Series 2014-2 ("ARLP 2014-2") issued $270.8 million in Class A Notes (the “Class A Notes”) with a weighted coupon of approximately 3.85% and $234.0 million in Class M Notes (the “Class M Notes”). Residential initially retained $95.8 million of the Class A Notes and all of the Class M Notes in its taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”). On February 9, 2015, Residential sold $50.7 million of the retained Class A Notes to an unrelated third party. No interest will be paid on any Class M Notes while any Class A Notes remain outstanding. The Class A Notes and the Class M Notes are secured solely by the non-performing mortgage loans and REO properties of ARLP 2014-2 and not by any of Residential's other assets. The assets of ARLP 2014-2 are the only source of repayment and interest on the Class A Notes and the Class M Notes. The Class A Notes and the Class M Notes mature on January 26, 2054, and Residential does not guaranty any of the obligations of ARLP 2014-2 under the terms of the Indenture governing the notes or otherwise. As of March 31, 2015, the book value of the underlying securitized assets held by ARLP 2014-2 was $332.5 million.
On September 25, 2014, Residential completed a securitization transaction in which ARLP Securitization Trust, Series 2014-1 (“ARLP 2014-1”) issued $150.0 million in Class A Notes (the “Class A Notes”) with a weighted coupon of approximately 3.47% and $32.0 million in Class M Notes (the “Class M Notes”) with a weighted coupon of 4.25%. The Class A Notes and the Class M Notes are secured solely by the non-performing mortgage loans and REO properties of ARLP 2014-1 and not by any of Residential's other assets. The assets of ARLP 2014-1 are the only source of repayment and interest on the Class A Notes and the Class M Notes. The Class A Notes and the Class M Notes mature on September 25, 2044, and Residential does not guaranty any of the obligations of ARLP 2014-1 under the terms of the Indenture governing the notes or otherwise. As of March 31, 2015, the book value of the underlying securitized assets held by ARLP 2014-1 was $213.8 million.
Residential retained all of the Class M Notes issued by ARLP 2014-1 in its TRS. On September 30, 2014, pursuant to a master repurchase agreement, the TRS sold $15.0 million of the Class M Notes to NewSource Reinsurance Company Ltd, ("NewSource"), an entity in which Residential owns 100% of the outstanding preferred stock and in which we own 100% of the outstanding common stock, for a purchase price of $15.0 million. The master repurchase agreement initially required the TRS to repurchase the Class M Notes from NewSource at a 5.0% yield on December 28, 2014, with the parties having the option to extend the master repurchase agreement for additional 89-day periods. In no event can the master repurchase agreement be extended beyond September 29, 2015. The agreement is currently due to expire on June 25, 2015.
On March 18, 2014, we closed a private placement for the issuance and sale of 250,000 shares of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock to Luxor Capital Group, LP, a New York based investment manager, and other institutional investors for proceeds of $250.0 million. In connection with the foregoing, the Company's Board of Directors has approved a share
8
repurchase program that authorizes us to repurchase up to $300.0 million of our common stock. We used substantially all of the proceeds from this transaction to repurchase shares of our common stock and for other corporate purposes. We have an aggregate of $59.4 million remaining for repurchases under our Board-approved repurchase plan.
Basis of presentation and use of estimates
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States which we refer to as “U.S. GAAP.” All wholly owned subsidiaries are included and all intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
The unaudited consolidated financial statements and accompanying unaudited consolidated financial information, in our opinion, contain all adjustments that are of a normal recurring nature and necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods. The interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. We have omitted certain notes and other information from the interim consolidated financial statements presented in this Quarterly Report as permitted by SEC rules and regulations. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our 2014 annual report on Form 10-K.
Preferred stock
During the first quarter of 2014, we issued $250.0 million of convertible preferred stock. All of the outstanding shares of preferred stock are redeemable by us in March 2020, the sixth anniversary of the date of issuance, and every five years thereafter. On these same redemption dates, each holder of preferred stock may cause us to redeem all the shares of preferred stock held by such holder at a redemption price equal to $1,000 per share. Accordingly, we classify these shares as mezzanine equity, outside of permanent stockholders' equity.
The holders of shares of Series A Preferred Stock will not be entitled to receive dividends with respect to the Series A Preferred Stock. The shares of Series A Preferred Stock are convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $1,250 per share, subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments.
Upon a change of control or upon a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, holders of the Series A Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive an amount in cash per Series A Preferred Stock equal to the greater of:
(i) $1,000 plus the aggregate amount of cash dividends paid on the number of shares of Common Stock into which such share of Series A Preferred Stock was convertible on each ex-dividend date for such dividends; and
(ii) the number of shares of Common Stock into which the Series A Preferred Stock is then convertible multiplied by the then current market price of the Common Stock.
The Series A Preferred Stock confers no voting rights to holders, except with respect to matters that materially and adversely affect the voting powers, rights or preferences of the Series A Preferred Stock or as otherwise required by applicable law.
With respect to the distribution of assets upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, the Series A Preferred Stock ranks senior to our common stock and on parity with all other classes of preferred stock that may be issued by us in the future.
Treasury Stock
We account for repurchased common stock under the cost method and include such treasury stock as a component of total shareholders’ equity. We have repurchased shares of our common stock (i) under our Board approval to repurchase up to $300.0 million in shares of our common stock and (ii) upon our withholding of shares of our common stock to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of our restricted stock.
9
Recently issued accounting standards
In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) - Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs are presented on the balance sheet as a deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability instead of being presented as an asset. Debt disclosures will include the face amount of the debt liability and the effective interest rate. The standard requires retrospective application and represents a change in accounting principle. The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the impact of adopting this standard to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810) – Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. ASU 2015-02 makes targeted amendments to the current consolidation guidance that change the analysis a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. This guidance addresses concerns that current accounting might require a reporting entity to consolidate another legal entity in situations in which the reporting entity’s contractual rights do not give it the ability to act primarily on its own behalf, the reporting entity does not hold a majority of the legal entity’s voting rights, or the reporting entity is not exposed to a majority of the legal entity’s economic benefits or obligations. The standard is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early application is permitted. We are evaluating the impact of ASU 2015-02 on our consolidated financial statements, which could result in the deconsolidation of Residential's financial information in our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 is a comprehensive new revenue recognition model requiring a company to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount reflecting the consideration it expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 may be applied using either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach and is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is not permitted. We do not expect this amendment to have a significant effect on our financial position or results of operations.
2. Mortgage loans
Acquisitions of non-performing residential mortgage loans
During the first quarter of 2015, Residential did not acquire any portfolios of residential mortgage loans. During the three months ended March 31, 2014, Residential acquired an aggregate of 4,207 residential mortgage loans, substantially all of which were non-performing, having an aggregate UPB of approximately $1.1 billion and an aggregate market value of underlying properties of $901 million. The aggregate purchase price for these acquisitions was approximately $611 million.
During the three months ended March 31, 2015, Residential expensed $0.1 million for due diligence costs related to a potential purchase of a portfolio that was not ultimately acquired. During the three months ended March 31, 2014, Residential recognized $0.5 million for due diligence costs related to transactions in both general and administrative expense and related party general and administrative expense.
Generally, we expect that Residential's mortgage loan and REO portfolios may grow at an uneven pace, as opportunities to acquire distressed residential mortgage loans may be irregularly timed and may involve large portfolios of loans, and the timing and extent of Residential's success in acquiring such loans cannot be predicted. In addition, for any given portfolio of loans that Residential agrees to acquire, it typically acquires fewer loans than originally expected, as certain loans may be resolved prior to the closing date or may fail to meet Residential's diligence standards. The number of loans excluded from an acquisition typically constitutes a relatively small portion of a particular portfolio. In some cases, the number of loans Residential does not acquire could be significant. In any case where Residential does not acquire the full portfolio, appropriate adjustments are made to the applicable purchase price.
Throughout this report, all unpaid principal balance and market value amounts for the portfolios Residential has acquired are provided as of “cut-off date” for each transaction unless otherwise indicated. The “cut-off date” for each acquisition is a date shortly before the closing used to identify the final loans being purchased and the related unpaid principal balance, market value of underlying properties and other characteristics of the loans.
10
Transfer of mortgage loans to real estate owned
During the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, Residential transferred 724 and 636 mortgage loans, respectively, to REO at an aggregate fair value based on BPOs, of $134.8 million and $96.5 million respectively. Such transfers occur when the foreclosure sale is complete. In connection with these transfers to REO, Residential recorded $18.4 million and $23.6 million, respectively, in net unrealized gains on mortgage loans. At March 31, 2015 Residential had 7,021 loans with a carrying value of $1.4 billion that were in the foreclosure process compared to 7,841 loans with a carrying value of $1.5 billion at March 31, 2014.
Dispositions
During the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, Residential disposed of 150 and 116 mortgage loans, respectively, primarily through short sales, refinancing and foreclosure sales. In connection with these dispositions, Residential recorded $15.4 million and $9.3 million, respectively, of net realized gains on mortgage loans.
Acquisition of re-performing residential mortgage loans
On June 27, 2014, Residential acquired 879 re-performing mortgage loans with an aggregate market value of underlying properties of $271.1 million for an aggregate purchase price of $144.6 million. Under ASC 310-30, acquired loans may be aggregated and accounted for as a pool of loans if the loans being aggregated have common risk characteristics. A pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. These 879 re-performing residential mortgage loans were determined to have common risk characteristics and have been accounted for as a single loan pool. During October 2014, Residential sold an aggregate of 934 re-performing loans to an unrelated third party for an aggregate purchase price of $164 million. The sale included 770 loans from the re-performing mortgage loans purchased in June 2014, and 164 loans that had transitioned to re-performing status from prior non-performing loan acquisitions.
Under ASC 310-30, Residential estimates cash flows expected to be collected, adjusted for expected prepayments and defaults expected to be incurred over the life of the loan pool. Residential determines the excess of the loan pool's contractually required principal and interest payments over the expected cash flows as an amount that should not be accreted, the nonaccretable yield. The difference between expected cash flows and the present value of the expected cash flows is referred to as the accretable yield, which represents the amount that is expected to be recorded as interest income over the remaining life of the loan pool. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, Residential recognized no provision for loan loss and no adjustments to the amount of the accretable yield. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, Residential accreted $0.2 million into interest income with respect to these re-performing loans. As of March 31, 2015, these re-performing loans, having a UPB of $17.5 million and a carrying value of $12.5 million, were held for sale.
The following tables present information regarding the estimates of the contractually required payments and the cash flows expected to be collected as of the date of the acquisition and changes in the balance of the accretable yield ($ in thousands):
Three months ended March 31, 2015 | ||||||
Accretable Yield | Carrying Amount of Loans | |||||
Balance at the beginning of the period | $ | 7,640 | $ | 12,535 | ||
Additions | — | 37 | ||||
Payments and other reductions, net | (201 | ) | (319 | ) | ||
Accretion | (232 | ) | 232 | |||
Balance at the end of the period | $ | 7,207 | $ | 12,485 |
3. Real estate assets, net
Real estate held for use
As of March 31, 2015, Residential had 3,464 REO properties held for use. Of these properties, 587 had been rented, 151 were being listed for rent and 116 were in varying stages of renovation. With respect to the remaining 2,610 REO properties, we will make a final determination whether each property meets Residential’s rental profile after (a) applicable state redemption periods have expired, (b) the foreclosure sale has been ratified (c) Residential has recorded the deed for the property, (d) utilities have been activated and (e) Residential has secured access for interior inspection. A majority of the REO properties are subject to
11
state regulations which require Residential to await the expiration of a redemption period before a foreclosure can be finalized. Residential includes these redemption periods in its portfolio pricing which generally reduces the price Residential pays for the mortgage loans. Once the redemption period expires, Residential immediately proceeds to record the new deed, take possession of the property, activate utilities, and start the inspection process in order to make its final determination. As of December 31, 2014, Residential had 3,349 REO properties held for use. Of these properties, 336 had been rented, 197 were being listed for rent and 254 were in various stages of renovation. With respect to the remaining 2,562 REO properties, we were in the process of determining whether these properties would meet Residential's rental profile. As of March 31, 2014, Residential had 852 REO properties held for use. Of these properties, 35 had been rented, 17 were being listed for rent and 48 were in various stages of renovation. With respect to the remaining 752 REO properties, we were in the process of determining whether these properties would meet Residential's rental profile. If a REO property meets Residential's rental profile, we determine the extent of renovations that are needed to generate an optimal rent and maintain consistency of renovation specifications for future branding. If we determine that the REO property will not meet Residential's rental profile, we list the property for sale, in certain instances after renovations are made to optimize the sale proceeds.
Real estate held for sale
As of March 31, 2015, Residential classified 966 properties having an aggregate carrying value of $150.8 million as real estate held for sale as they do not meet its residential rental property investment criteria. As of December 31, 2014, Residential had 611 REO properties having an aggregate carrying value of $92.2 million held for sale, and as of March 31, 2014, Residential had 44 REO properties having an aggregate carrying value of $4.2 million held for sale. None of these REO properties have any operations; therefore, we are not presenting discontinued operations related to these properties.
Residential records residential properties held for sale at the lower of either the carrying amount of REO or its estimated fair value less estimated selling costs. If the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value, as adjusted, Residential records impairment equal to the amount of such excess. If an increase in fair value is noted at a subsequent measurement date, a gain is recognized to the extent of any previous impairment recognized. As of March 31, 2015 Residential had $9.0 million of impairment on the 966 REO properties having a fair value of $168.9 million. As of December 31, 2014 Residential had $4.9 million of impairment on the 611 REO properties having a fair value of $96.0 million. There was no impairment on the 44 REO properties held at March 31, 2014.
Dispositions
During the three months ended March 31, 2015, Residential disposed of 254 residential properties and recorded $10.6 million of net realized gains on real estate. During the three months ended March 31, 2014, Residential disposed of two residential properties. There were no significant gain or losses on the dispositions in 2014.
12
4. Fair value of financial instruments
The following table sets forth the fair value of financial assets and liabilities by level within the fair value hierarchy as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 ($ in thousands):
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||
Quoted prices in active markets | Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices | Unobservable inputs | |||||||
March 31, 2015 | |||||||||
Recurring basis (assets) | |||||||||
Mortgage loans | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,853,495 | |||
Nonrecurring basis (assets) | |||||||||
Real estate assets held for sale | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 168,942 | |||
Transfer of real estate owned to mortgage loans | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,356 | |||
Transfer of mortgage loans to real estate owned | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 136,182 | |||
Not recognized on consolidated balance sheets at fair value (assets) | |||||||||
Mortgage loans held for sale | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 12,485 | |||
Not recognized on consolidated balance sheets at fair value (liabilities) | |||||||||
Repurchase agreements at fair value | $ | — | $ | 929,287 | $ | — | |||
Other secured borrowings | $ | — | $ | 362,429 | $ | — | |||
December 31, 2014 | |||||||||
Recurring basis (assets) | |||||||||
Mortgage loans | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,959,044 | |||
Nonrecurring basis (assets) | |||||||||
Real estate assets held for sale | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 96,041 | |||
Transfer of real estate owned to mortgage loans | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 8,400 | |||
Transfer of mortgage loans to real estate owned | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 595,668 | |||
Not recognized on consolidated balance sheets at fair value (assets) | |||||||||
Mortgage loans held for sale | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 12,535 | |||
Not recognized on consolidated balance sheets at fair value (liabilities) | |||||||||
Repurchase agreements at fair value | $ | — | $ | 1,015,000 | $ | — | |||
Other secured borrowings | $ | — | $ | 336,409 | $ | — |
Residential has not transferred any assets from one level to another level during the three months ended March 31, 2015 or during the year ended December 31, 2014.
The carrying values of Residential's and our cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, related party receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, related party payables, preferred stock, and investment in NewSource are equal to or approximate fair value. The fair value of mortgage loans is estimated using our proprietary pricing model. The fair value of transfers of mortgage loans to real estate owned is estimated using BPOs. The fair value of re-performing mortgage loans held for sale is estimated using the present value of the future estimated principal and interest payments of the loan, with the discount rate used in the present value calculation representing the estimated effective yield of the loan. The fair value of the repurchase agreements is estimated using the income approach based on credit spreads available currently in the market for similar floating rate debt. The fair value of other secured borrowings is estimated using observable market data.
The following table sets forth the changes in Residential's level 3 assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis ($ in thousands):
13
Three months ended March 31, 2015 | Three months ended March 31, 2014 | ||||||
Mortgage loans | |||||||
Beginning balance | $ | 1,959,044 | $ | 1,207,163 | |||
Investment in mortgage loans | — | 612,508 | |||||
Net unrealized gain on mortgage loans | 61,134 | 65,130 | |||||
Net realized gain on mortgage loans | 15,382 | 9,321 | |||||
Mortgage loan dispositions and payments | (65,168 | ) | (39,458 | ) | |||
Real estate tax advances to borrowers | 7,127 | 8,006 | |||||
Reclassification of realized gains on real estate sold from unrealized gains | 10,802 | — | |||||
Transfer of real estate owned to mortgage loans | 1,356 | — | |||||
Transfer of mortgage loans to real estate owned | (136,182 | ) | (96,528 | ) | |||
Ending balance at March 31 | $ | 1,853,495 | $ | 1,766,142 | |||
Net unrealized gain on mortgage loans held at the end of the period | $ | 51,068 | $ | 38,197 |
The following table sets forth the fair value of Residential's mortgage loans, the related unpaid principal balance and market value of underlying properties by delinquency status as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 ($ in thousands):
Number of loans | Carrying Value | Unpaid principal balance | Market value of underlying properties | ||||||||
March 31, 2015 | |||||||||||
Current | 794 | $ | 127,984 | $ | 183,091 | $ | 188,031 | ||||
30 | 95 | 13,653 | 20,233 | 20,694 | |||||||
60 | 41 | 6,423 | 8,986 | 10,288 | |||||||
90 | 2,138 | 332,892 | 531,217 | 502,562 | |||||||
Foreclosure | 7,021 | 1,372,543 | 1,964,595 | 1,801,433 | |||||||
Mortgage loans | 10,089 | $ | 1,853,495 | $ | 2,708,122 | $ | 2,523,008 | ||||
December 31, 2014 | |||||||||||
Current | 670 | $ | 107,467 | $ | 159,731 | $ | 160,654 | ||||
30 | 109 | 15,424 | 22,629 | 24,046 | |||||||
60 | 57 | 7,921 | 11,624 | 12,510 | |||||||
90 | 2,286 | 361,434 | 569,930 | 544,709 | |||||||
Foreclosure | 7,841 | 1,466,798 | 2,172,047 | 1,951,606 | |||||||
Mortgage Loans | 10,963 | $ | 1,959,044 | $ | 2,935,961 | $ | 2,693,525 |
14
The following table sets forth the carrying value of Residential's re-performing mortgage loans held for sale, the related unpaid principal balance and market value of underlying properties by delinquency status as of March 31, 2015.
Number of loans | Carrying value | Unpaid principal balance | Market value of underlying properties | ||||||||
March 31, 2015 | |||||||||||
Current | 69 | $ | 8,597 | $ | 12,004 | $ | 15,102 | ||||
30 | 6 | 498 | 1,018 | 1,074 | |||||||
60 | — | — | — | — | |||||||
90 | 24 | 3,390 | 4,498 | 5,931 | |||||||
Mortgage loans held for sale | 99 | $ | 12,485 | $ | 17,520 | $ | 22,107 | ||||
December 31, 2014 | |||||||||||
Current | 68 | $ | 8,317 | $ | 11,938 | $ | 15,154 | ||||
30 | 6 | 1,118 | 1,667 | 2,004 | |||||||
60 | 4 | 359 | 644 | 670 | |||||||
90 | 24 | 2,741 | 4,149 | 4,624 | |||||||
Mortgage loans held for sale | 102 | $ | 12,535 | $ | 18,398 | $ | 22,452 |
The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of Residential's mortgage loans are discount rates, forecasts of future home prices, alternate loan resolution probabilities, resolution timelines and the value of underlying properties. Significant changes in any of these inputs in isolation could result in a significant change to the fair value measurement. A decline in the discount rate in isolation would increase the fair value. A decrease in the housing pricing index in isolation would decrease the fair value. Individual loan characteristics such as location and value of underlying collateral affect the loan resolution probabilities and timelines. An increase in the loan resolution timeline in isolation would decrease the fair value. A decrease in the value of underlying properties in isolation would decrease the fair value. The following table sets forth quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used to measure the fair value of Residential's mortgage loans as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
Input | March 31, 2015 | December 31, 2014 |
Equity discount rate | 15.0% | 15.0% |
Debt to asset ratio | 65.0% | 65.0% |
Cost of funds | 3.5% over 1 month LIBOR | 3.5% over 1 month LIBOR |
Annual change in home pricing index | 0% to 7.6% | -0.1% to 7.6% |
Loan resolution probabilities — modification | 0% to 44.7% | 0% to 44.7% |
Loan resolution probabilities — rental | 0% to 100.0% | 0% to 100.0% |
Loan resolution probabilities — liquidation | 0% to 100.0% | 0% to 100.0% |
Loan resolution timelines (in years) | 0.1 to 5.3 | 0.1 to 5.3 |
Value of underlying properties | $500 - $5,500,000 | $3,000 - $5,300,000 |
5. Borrowings
Repurchase Agreements
Residential's operating partnership and certain of its Delaware Statutory Trust subsidiaries, as applicable, have entered into master repurchase agreements with major financial institutions. The purpose of these repurchase agreements is to finance the acquisition and ownership of mortgage loans, rental properties and REO properties in its portfolio. Residential has effective control of the assets associated with these agreements and therefore it has concluded these are financing arrangements. As of March 31, 2015, the weighted average annualized interest rate on borrowing under Residential's repurchase agreements was 3.06%, excluding amortization of deferred financing costs. The following table sets forth data with respect to Residential's repurchase agreements as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 ($ in thousands):
15
Maximum borrowing capacity | Book value of collateral | Amount outstanding | |||||||
March 31, 2015 | |||||||||
CS repurchase agreement due April 20, 2015 | $ | 225,000 | $ | 331,633 | $ | 183,806 | |||
Wells repurchase agreement due March 23, 2016 | 525,780 | 986,572 | 525,780 | ||||||
DB repurchase agreement due March 11, 2016 | 219,701 | 457,553 | 219,701 | ||||||
$ | 970,481 | $ | 1,775,758 | $ | 929,287 | ||||
December 31, 2014 | |||||||||
CS repurchase agreement due April 20, 2015 | $ | 225,000 | $ | 332,618 | $ | 222,044 | |||
Wells repurchase agreement due March 23, 2015 | 750,000 | 1,036,409 | 569,509 | ||||||
DB repurchase agreement due March 11, 2016 | 250,000 | 450,532 | 223,447 | ||||||
$ | 1,225,000 | $ | 1,819,559 | $ | 1,015,000 |
Under the terms of each repurchase agreement, as collateral for the funds Residential draws thereunder, subject to certain conditions, Residential's operating partnership will sell to the applicable lender equity interests in its Delaware statutory trust subsidiaries that owns the applicable underlying assets on its behalf, or the trust will directly sell such underlying mortgage assets. In the event the lender determines the value of the collateral has decreased, the lender has the right to initiate a margin call and require Residential, or the applicable trust subsidiary, to post additional collateral or to repay a portion of the outstanding borrowings. The price paid by the lender for each mortgage asset Residential finances under the repurchase agreements is based on a percentage of the market value of the mortgage asset and may depend on its delinquency status. With respect to funds drawn under the repurchase agreements, Residential's operating partnership is required to pay the lender interest based on LIBOR or at the lender's cost of funds plus a spread calculated based on the type of applicable mortgage assets collateralizing the funding, as well as certain other customary fees, administrative costs and expenses to maintain and administer the repurchase agreements. Residential does not collateralize any of its repurchase facilities with cash. Pursuant to the CS Repurchase Agreement, Residential is entitled to collateralize a portion of the facility with securities. As of March 31, 2015, approximately $10.6 million of the amounts outstanding under the CS Repurchase Agreement was collateralized by $17.0 million of the Class M Notes issued and retained by Residential in connection with the securitization completed in September 2014 by ARLP 2014-1, and approximately $29.4 million of the amounts outstanding under the CS Repurchase Agreement was collateralized by $45.1 million of the Class A2 Notes issued and retained by Residential in connection with the securitization completed in November 2014 by ARLP 2014-2.
The repurchase agreements require Residential to maintain various financial and other covenants, including maintaining a minimum adjusted tangible net worth, a maximum ratio of indebtedness to adjusted tangible net worth and specified levels of unrestricted cash. In addition, the repurchase agreements contain customary events of default. Residential is restricted by the terms of its repurchase agreements from paying dividends greater than its REIT taxable income in a calendar year.
Residential is currently in compliance with the covenants and other requirements with respect to its repurchase agreements. We monitor Residential's banking partners' ability to perform under the repurchase agreements and have concluded there is currently no reason to doubt that they will continue to perform under the repurchase agreements as contractually obligated.
Other Secured Debt
On November 25, 2014, Residential completed a securitization transaction in which ARLP 2014-2 issued $270.8 million in Class A Notes with a weighted coupon of approximately 3.85% and $234.0 million in Class M Notes. Residential initially retained $95.8 million of the Class A Notes and all of the Class M Notes in its TRS. On February 9, 2015, Residential sold $50.7 million of the retained Class A Notes to an unrelated third party. No interest will be paid on any Class M Notes while any Class A Notes remain outstanding. The Class A Notes and Class M Notes are secured solely by the non-performing mortgage loans and REO properties of ARLP 2014-2 and not by any of Residential's other assets. The assets of ARLP 2014-2 are the only source of repayment and interest on the Class A Notes and the Class M Notes. The Class A Notes and the Class M Notes mature on January 26, 2054, and Residential does not guaranty any of the obligations of ARLP 2014-2 under the terms of the Indenture governing the notes or otherwise. As of March 31, 2015, the book value of the underlying securitized assets held by ARLP 2014-2 was $332.5 million.
On September 25, 2014, Residential completed a securitization transaction in which ARLP 2014-1 issued $150.0 million in Class A Notes with a weighted coupon of approximately 3.5% and $32.0 million in Class M Notes with a weighted coupon of 4.25%. The Class A Notes and the Class M Notes are secured solely by the non-performing mortgage loans of ARLP 2014-1
16
and not by any of Residential's other assets. The assets of ARLP 2014-1 are the only source of repayment and interest on the Class A Notes and the Class M Notes. The Class A Notes and the Class M Notes mature on September 25, 2044, and Residential does not guaranty any of the obligations of ARLP 2014-1 under the terms of the Indenture governing the notes or otherwise. As of March 31, 2015, the book value of the underlying securitized assets held by ARLP 2014-1 was $213.8 million.
Residential retained all of the Class M Notes in its TRS. On September 30, 2014, pursuant to a master repurchase agreement, the TRS sold $15.0 million of the Class M Notes to NewSource for a purchase price of $15.0 million. The master repurchase agreement initially required the TRS to repurchase the Class M Notes from NewSource at a 5.0% yield on December 28, 2014, with the parties having the option to extend the master repurchase agreement for additional 89-day periods. In no event can the master repurchase agreement be extended beyond September 29, 2015. The agreement is currently due to expire on June 25, 2015.
The following table sets forth data with respect to these notes as of March 31, 2015 ($ in thousands):
Interest Rate | Amount outstanding | ||||
March 31, 2015 | |||||
ARLP Securitization Trust, Series 2014-1 | |||||
ARLP 2014-1 Class A Notes due September 25, 2044(1) | 3.47 | % | $ | 145,953 | |
ARLP 2014-1 Class M Notes due September 25, 2044(2) | 4.25 | % | 32,000 | ||
ARLP Securitization Trust, Series 2014-2 | |||||
ARLP 2014-2 Class A Notes due January 26, 2054(3) | 3.85 | % | 264,034 | ||
ARLP 2014-2 Class M Notes due January 26, 2054 | — | % | 234,010 | ||
ARNS, Inc. | |||||
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase due June 25, 2015 | 5.00 | % | 14,991 | ||
Intercompany eliminations | |||||
Elimination of ARLP 2014-1 Class A Notes due to ARNS, Inc. | (14,991 | ) | |||
Elimination of ARLP 2014-1 Class M Notes due to ARNS, Inc. | (32,000 | ) | |||
Elimination of ARLP 2014-2 Class A Notes due to ARNS, Inc. | (45,138 | ) | |||
Elimination of ARLP 2014-2 Class M Notes due to ARNS, Inc. | (234,010 | ) | |||
$ | 364,849 | ||||
December 31, 2014 | |||||
ARLP Securitization Trust, Series 2014-1 | |||||
ARLP 2014-1 Class A Notes due September 25, 2044(1) | 3.47 | % | $ | 150,000 | |
ARLP 2014-1 Class M Notes due September 25, 2044(2) | 4.25 | % | 32,000 | ||
ARLP Securitization Trust, Series 2014-2 | |||||
ARLP 2014-2 Class A Notes due January 26, 2054(3) | 3.85 | % | 269,820 | ||
ARLP 2014-2 Class M Notes due January 26, 2054 | — | % | 234,010 | ||
ARNS, Inc. | |||||
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase due March 27, 2015 | 5.00 | % | 14,991 | ||
Intercompany eliminations | |||||
Elimination of ARLP 2014-1 Class A Notes due to ARNS, Inc. | (15,000 | ) | |||
Elimination of ARLP 2014-1 Class M Notes due to ARNS, Inc. | (32,000 | ) | |||
Elimination of ARLP 2014-2 Class A Notes due to ARNS, Inc. | (95,729 | ) | |||
Elimination of ARLP 2014-2 Class M Notes due to ARNS, Inc. | (234,010 | ) | |||
$ | 324,082 |
_____________
(1) | The expected redemption date for the Class A Notes is September 25, 2017. |
(2) | The expected redemption date for the Class M Notes is September 25, 2018. |
(3) | The expected redemption date for the Class A Notes is November 27, 2017. |
17
6. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation, claims and assessments
There have been no material new developments in our legal proceedings since the March 2, 2015 filing of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, except as follows:
The Police Retirement System of Saint Louis v. Erbey, et al. On April 2, 2015, The Police Retirement System of Saint Louis and the defendants entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) reflecting an agreement in principle to settle the action with the settlement consideration being the new AMA. The MOU contemplates the negotiation and execution of a stipulation of settlement. The stipulation of settlement will be subject to customary conditions, including court approval. If the settlement is finally approved by the court, it will resolve and release all claims in the action that were, or could have been brought by or on behalf of Residential challenging any aspect of the Original AMA and the negotiation of, the terms and provisions of, or the approval of the new AMA. In addition, in connection with the settlement, the parties agreed that plaintiff’s counsel will apply to the court for an award of fees and expenses. There can be no assurances that the parties will ultimately enter into a stipulation of settlement or that the court will approve the settlement.
City of Cambridge Retirement System v. Altisource Asset Management Corp., et al. On March 17, 2015, four plaintiffs filed motions to be appointed as Lead Plaintiff, and these motions are currently before the Court. AAMC’s time to answer or otherwise plead has been extended until after a Lead Plaintiff is appointed.
Kanga v. Altisource Asset Management Corporation, et al. On March 12, 2015, a shareholder derivative action was filed in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, Division of St. Croix by a purported shareholder of AAMC under the caption Nanzeen Kanga v. William Erbey et al., SX-15-CV-105. The action names as defendants William C. Erbey and each of the current and former members of AAMC's Board of Directors and alleges that Mr. Erbey and AAMC’s directors breached fiduciary duties in connection with the disclosures that are the subject of the City of Cambridge Retirement System case described above and certain other matters involving the relationship of Residential and AAMC. At this time, we are not able to predict the ultimate outcome of this matter, nor can we estimate the range of possible loss, if any.
For the litigation described above where an estimate is possible, management has established a litigation accrual in the amount of $3.0 million on a consolidated basis. This estimated liability is based upon currently available information and is subject to significant judgment and a variety of assumptions, as well as known and unknown uncertainties. Matters underlying the Company’s litigation accrual may change from time to time, and actual results may vary significantly from the current estimate, including as a result of changes in our ongoing and future legal proceedings. Those matters for which an estimate is not possible are not included within this litigation accrual. Therefore, this estimated liability represents what we believe to be an estimate of liability only for certain liabilities that are estimable and probable, and does not represent our maximum loss exposure.
7. Related party transactions
New Asset Management Agreement with Residential
On March 31, 2015, we entered into a new Asset Management Agreement ("AMA") with Residential.
The AMA, which became effective on April 1, 2015, provides for a new management fee structure which replaces the incentive fee structure under the original asset management agreement (the “Original AMA”) as follows:
• | We are entitled to a quarterly base management fee equal to 1.5% of the product of (i) Residential’s average invested capital for the quarter multiplied by (ii) 0.25, while Residential has fewer than 2,500 single family rental properties actually rented (“Rental Properties”). The base management fee percentage increases to 1.75% of invested capital while Residential has between 2,500 and 4,499 Rental Properties and increases to 2.0% of invested capital while Residential has 4,500 or more Rental Properties; |
• | We are entitled to a quarterly incentive management fee equal to 20% of the amount by which Residential's return on invested capital exceeds a hurdle return rate of between 7.0% and 8.25% (depending on the 10-year treasury rate). The incentive management fee increases to 22.5% while Residential has between 2,500 and 4,499 Rental Properties and increases to 25% while Residential has 4,500 or more Rental Properties; and |
18
• | We are entitled to a quarterly conversion fee equal to 1.5% of the market value of the single-family homes leased by Residential for the first time during the quarter. |
Residential has the flexibility to pay up to 25% of the incentive management fee to us in shares of Residential common stock.
Under the new AMA, we will continue to be the exclusive asset manager for Residential for an initial term of 15 years from April 1, 2015, with two potential five-year extensions, subject to Residential achieving an average annual return on invested capital of at least 7.0%. Under the AMA, Residential will not be required to reimburse us for the allocable compensation and routine overhead expenses of our employees and staff, all of which will now be covered by the base management fee described above.
Neither party is entitled to terminate the AMA prior to the end of the initial term, or each renewal term, other than termination by (a) Residential and/or us “for cause” for certain events such as a material breach of the AMA and failure to cure such breach, (b) Residential for certain other reasons such as Residential’s failure to achieve a return on invested capital of at least 7.0% for two consecutive fiscal years after the third anniversary of the AMA, and (c) Residential in connection with certain change of control events.
Summary of Related Party Transaction Expenses
Through January 16, 2015, William C. Erbey served as our Chairman as well as the Executive Chairman of Ocwen, Chairman of Altisource, and Chairman of Residential. Effective January 16, 2015, Mr. Erbey stepped down as the Executive Chairman of Ocwen and Chairman of each of Altisource, Residential and AAMC and is no longer a member of the Board of Directors for any of these companies. As of March 31, 2015, Mr. Erbey owned or controlled approximately 28% of our common stock, approximately 4% of the common stock of Residential, approximately 30% of the common stock of Altisource, and approximately 14% of the common stock of Ocwen. As of March 31, 2015, Mr. Erbey also held 857,543 options to purchase Altisource common stock (all of which were exercisable), 3,572,626 options to purchase Ocwen common stock (3,322,626 of which were exercisable) and 85,755 options to purchase our common stock (all of which were exercisable).
As a result of Mr. Erbey’s position as our Chairman and as Chairman of each of Ocwen, Altisource and Residential during the beginning of the first quarter, combined with his share ownership, these companies are considered related parties of Residential for the first quarter of 2015. We will continue to monitor the facts and circumstances with respect to Mr. Erbey, as well as our continuing officers and directors, to determine whether any of Altisource, Ocwen or Residential will be related parties in future periods.
19
Our Consolidated Statements of Operations included the following significant related party transactions ($ in thousands):
Three months ended March 31, 2015 | Counter-party | Consolidated Statements of Operations location | |||
2015 | |||||
Residential property operating expenses | $ | 9,512 | Ocwen/Altisource | Residential property operating expenses | |
Mortgage loan servicing costs | 16,985 | Ocwen | Mortgage loan servicing costs | ||
Office and occupancy costs | 107 | Ocwen/Altisource | Related party general and administrative expenses | ||
Salaries and benefits | 214 | Ocwen/Altisource | Related party general and administrative expenses | ||
Other general and administrative expenses | 451 | Altisource | Related party general and administrative expenses | ||
Expense reimbursements | 960 | Residential/NewSource | Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in consolidated affiliate | ||
Professional fee sharing for negotiation of AMA | 2,000 | Residential | Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in consolidated affiliate | ||
Management incentive fee | 14,900 | Residential | Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in consolidated affiliate | ||
Three months ended March 31, 2014 | Counter-party | Consolidated Statements of Operations location | |||
2014 | |||||
Residential property operating expenses | $ | 1,050 | Ocwen/Altisource | Residential property operating expenses | |
Mortgage loan servicing costs | 10,490 | Ocwen | Mortgage loan servicing costs | ||
Due diligence and unsuccessful deal costs | 111 | Altisource | Related party general and administrative expenses | ||
Office and occupancy costs | 74 | Ocwen | Related party general and administrative expenses | ||
Salaries and benefits | 517 | Ocwen/Altisource | Related party general and administrative expenses | ||
Other general and administrative expenses | — | Altisource | Related party general and administrative expenses | ||
Expense reimbursements | 1,780 | Residential/NewSource | Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interest in consolidated affiliate | ||
Management incentive fee | 10,911 | Residential | Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interest in consolidated affiliate |
On September 30, 2014, pursuant to a master repurchase agreement, Residential's TRS sold $15.0 million of the Class M Notes to NewSource for a purchase price of 15.0 million. The master repurchase agreement initially required the TRS to repurchase the Class M Notes from NewSource at a 5.0% yield on December 28, 2014, with the parties having the option to extend the master repurchase agreement for additional 89 day periods. In no event can the master repurchase agreement be extended beyond September 29, 2015. The agreement is currently due to expire on June 25, 2015.
8. Share-based payments
During the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, we granted 44,132 and 8,765 shares, respectively, of market-based restricted stock to certain members of executive management under our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan with a weighted average grant date fair value per share of $181.02 and $791.27, respectively.
Our directors each receive annual grants of restricted stock equal to $45,000 based on the market value of our common stock at the time of the annual stockholders meeting. This restricted stock vests and is issued after a one-year service period subject to each director attending at least 75% of the Board and committee meetings. No dividends are paid on the shares until the award is issued. During the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, we granted no share-based payments to directors.
We recorded $0.9 million and $3.3 million of compensation expense related to these grants for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. As of March 31, 2015 and 2014, we had an aggregate $25.6 million and $30.0 million, respectively, of total unrecognized share-based compensation cost to be recognized over a weighted average remaining estimated term of 2.0 years and 3.2 years, respectively.
20
9. Income taxes
We are domiciled in the United States Virgin Islands ("USVI") and under current USVI law are obligated to pay taxes in the United States Virgin Islands on income and/or capital gains. We applied for tax benefits from the United States Virgin Islands Economic Development Commission and received our certificate of benefits, effective as of February 1, 2013. Under the certificate of benefits, so long as we comply with the provisions of the certificate, we will receive a 90% exemption on our USVI sourced income taxes until 2043. NewSource is considered a controlled foreign corporation ("CFC") to AAMC. Subpart F income generated by a CFC is taxed currently in the USVI and is not eligible for the reduced tax rate under the certificate of benefits.
As of March 31, 2015 and 2014, neither Residential nor we accrued interest or penalties associated with any unrecognized tax benefits, nor was any interest expense or penalty recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. Residential recorded nominal state and local tax expense on income and property for the three months ended March 31, 2015. Our subsidiaries and we remain subject to tax examination for the period from inception to December 31, 2014.
10. Earnings per share
The following table sets forth the components of diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):
Three months ended March 31, 2015 | Three months ended March 31, 2014 | |||||||
Numerator | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 6,888 | 6,828 | |||||
Amortization of preferred stock issuance costs | 53 | — | ||||||
Numerator for basic EPS - income available to common stockholders | 6,835 | 6,828 | ||||||
Add back amortization of preferred stock issuance costs | 53 | — | ||||||
Numerator for diluted EPS - income available to common stockholders after assumed conversions | $ | 6,888 | $ | 6,828 | ||||
Denominator | ||||||||
Weighted average common stock outstanding – basic | 2,203,699 | 2,367,202 | ||||||
Stock options using treasury method | 232,712 | 273,778 | ||||||
Restricted stock | 120,795 | 183,988 | ||||||
Preferred shares if converted | 200,000 | 31,111 | ||||||
Weighted average common stock outstanding – diluted | 2,757,206 | 2,856,079 | ||||||
Earnings per basic share | $ | 3.10 | $ | 2.88 | ||||
Earnings per diluted share | $ | 2.50 | $ | 2.39 |
As of March 31, 2015, we had 42,198 restricted shares that were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share as they were antidilutive.
11. Segment information
Our primary business is to provide asset management and certain corporate governance services to Residential. Residential's primary business is the acquisition and ownership of single-family rental assets. Residential's primary sourcing strategy is to acquire these assets by purchasing sub-performing and non-performing mortgage loans. As a result, we operate in a single segment focused on the management of Residential's resolution of sub-performing and non-performing mortgages with the intent to modify as many loans as possible to keep borrowers in their homes or own the collateral which is suitable as long-term rental properties.
21
12. Subsequent events
New Loan and Security Agreement with Nomura
On April 10, 2015, Residential entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Nomura Corporate Funding Americas, LLC (“Nomura”). The purpose of the Loan Agreement is to finance Residential's beneficial ownership of REO properties. These obligations are fully guaranteed pursuant to a guaranty (the “Guaranty”) made by Residential in favor of Nomura. The Loan Agreement terminates on April 8, 2016.
Under the terms of the Loan Agreement, subject to certain conditions, Nomura may advance funds to Residential from time to time, with such advances collateralized by REO properties. The maximum aggregate advance for the REO properties under the Loan Agreement is $100.0 million, subject to certain sublimits, eligibility requirements and conditions precedent to each funding.
The advances paid by Nomura under the Loan Agreement with respect to the REO properties from time to time will be based on a percentage of the market value of the applicable REO properties. Under the terms of the Loan Agreement, Residential is required to pay to Nomura interest based on the one-month LIBOR plus a spread and certain other customary fees, administrative costs and expenses in connection with Nomura's structuring, management and ongoing administration of the Loan Agreement. The Loan Agreement requires Residential to maintain various standard financial and other covenants.
In addition, the Loan Agreement contains events of default (subject to certain materiality thresholds and grace periods), including payment defaults, breaches of covenants and/or certain representations and warranties, cross-defaults, certain material adverse changes, bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings and other events of default customary for this type of transaction. The remedies for such events of default are also customary for this type of transaction and include the acceleration of the principal amount outstanding under the Loan Agreement and the liquidation by Nomura of the REO properties then subject to the Loan Agreement.
Amended and Restated Repurchase Agreement with CS
On April 20, 2015, Residential entered into an Amended and Restated Master Repurchase Agreement with CS. The CS Repurchase Agreement, as amended and restated, increases the aggregate maximum funding capacity to finance the purchase and beneficial ownership of non-performing, re-performing and performing mortgage loans and REO properties from $225.0 million to $275.0 million, and also increases the sublimit for REO properties that can be financed on the facility.
The obligations of Residential's subsidiaries continue to be fully guaranteed by Residential pursuant to an amended and restated guaranty (the “Amended Guaranty”) made in favor of CS. As amended and restated, the Repurchase Agreement has been extended to mature on April 21, 2016.
All other material terms and conditions of the Repurchase Agreement remain the same as the original repurchase agreement in all material respects.
22
Item 2. Management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations
Overview
Our primary business is to provide asset management and certain corporate governance services to Residential and NewSource. We are an SEC-registered investment adviser under section 203(c) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. We have a capital light operating strategy. Residential is currently our primary source of revenue and currently drives our results.
On March 31, 2015 we entered into a new Asset Management Agreement with Residential (the "AMA") which became effective on April 1, 2015. The AMA provides for a new management fee structure which replaces the incentive fee structure under the original asset management agreement with Residential (the “Original AMA”) as follows:
• | We are entitled to a quarterly base management fee equal to 1.5% of the product of (i) Residential’s average invested capital for the quarter multiplied by (ii) 0.25, while Residential has fewer than 2,500 single family rental properties actually rented (“Rental Properties”). The base management fee percentage increases to 1.75% of invested capital while Residential has between 2,500 and 4,499 Rental Properties and increases to 2.0% of invested capital while Residential has 4,500 or more Rental Properties; |
• | We are entitled to a quarterly incentive management fee equal to 20% of the amount by which Residential's return on invested capital exceeds a hurdle return rate of between 7.0% and 8.25% (depending on the 10-year treasury rate). The incentive management fee increases to 22.5% while Residential has between 2,500 and 4,499 Rental Properties and increases to 25% while Residential has 4,500 or more Rental Properties; and |
• | We are entitled to a quarterly conversion fee equal to 1.5% of the market value of the single-family homes leased by Residential for the first time during the quarter. |
Residential has the flexibility to pay up to 25% of the incentive management fee to us in shares of Residential common stock.
Under the new AMA, we will continue to be the exclusive asset manager for Residential for an initial term of 15 years from April 1, 2015, with two potential five-year extensions, subject to Residential achieving an average annual return on invested capital of at least 7.0%. Under the AMA, Residential will not be required to reimburse us for the allocable compensation and routine overhead expenses of our employees and staff, all of which will now be covered by the base management fee described above.
Neither party is entitled to terminate the AMA prior to the end of the initial term, or each renewal term, other than termination by (a) Residential and/or us “for cause” for certain events such as a material breach of the AMA and failure to cure such breach, (b) Residential for certain other reasons such as Residential’s failure to achieve a return on invested capital of at least 7.0% for two consecutive fiscal years after the third anniversary of the AMA, and (c) Residential in connection with certain change of control events.
We have concluded that Residential is a variable interest entity because Residential’s equity holders lack the ability through voting rights to make decisions about Residential’s activities that have a significant effect on the success of Residential. We have also concluded that we are the primary beneficiary of Residential’s financial condition and results of operations because under the AMA we have the power to direct the activities of Residential that most significantly impact Residential’s economic performance including establishing Residential’s investment and business strategy. As a result, we consolidate Residential’s financial results in our consolidated financial statements.
Additionally, we provide management services to NewSource. On December 2, 2013, NewSource became registered as a licensed reinsurer with the BMA. Because we own 100% of voting common stock of NewSource and there are no substantive kick-out rights granted to other equity owners, we consolidate NewSource in our consolidated financial statements.
Since Residential has commenced operations, we have advised Residential and conducted portfolio analysis and the bidding process to facilitate the acquisition and growth of Residential’s portfolio of residential mortgage loans as follows:
During 2014 and 2013, Residential completed the acquisition of an aggregate of 15,817 residential mortgage loans, substantially all of which were non-performing, and 277 REO properties having an aggregate unpaid principal balance (“UPB”) of approximately $4.2 billion and an aggregate market value of underlying properties of approximately $3.6 billion. The
23
aggregate purchase price for these acquisitions was approximately $2.4 billion. There were no portfolio acquisitions completed in the first quarter of 2015.
Additionally, in June 2014, Residential acquired 879 re-performing mortgage loans with an aggregate market value of underlying properties of $271.1 million for an aggregate purchase price of $144.6 million. During October 2014, Residential sold 770 of these re-performing mortgage loans.
To date, Residential has acquired its non-performing and re-performing mortgage loans through direct acquisitions from institutions such as banks, HUD and private equity funds.
From inception through March 31, 2015, Residential modified an aggregate of 745 mortgage loans, converted an aggregate of 4,632 mortgage loans into REO properties and disposed of an aggregate of 1,096 mortgage loans through short sale, refinancing or other liquidation events.
Following the above-referenced transactions, as of March 31, 2015, Residential's portfolio consisted of 10,089 residential mortgage loans, substantially all of which were non-performing, having an aggregate UPB of approximately $2.7 billion and an aggregate market value of underlying properties of $2.5 billion. Residential also owned 4,430 REO properties with an aggregate carrying value of $714.8 million, of which 3,464 were held for use and 966 were held for sale. Of the 3,464 REO properties held for use, 587 REO properties had been rented and were occupied by tenants, 151 were being listed for rent and 116 were in varying stages of renovation. With respect to the remaining 2,610 REO properties held for use, Residential will make a final determination whether each property meets its rental profile after (a) applicable state redemption periods have expired, (b) the foreclosure sale has been ratified, (c) Residential has recorded the deed for the property, (d) utilities have been activated and (e) Residential has secured access for interior inspection. Residential also owned 99 re-performing mortgage loans held for sale having an aggregate UPB of approximately $17.5 million and an aggregate market value of underlying properties of approximately $22.1 million as of March 31, 2015.
NewSource commenced reinsurance activities during the second quarter of 2014. In December 2014, NewSource determined that the economics of the initial business did not warrant the continuation of its initial reinsurance quota share agreement with an unrelated third party. NewSource therefore transferred all of the risk of claims and future losses underwritten to an unrelated third party.
On March 18, 2014, we closed a private placement for the issuance and sale of 250,000 shares of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, to Luxor Capital Group, LP, a New York based investment manager, and other institutional investors for proceeds of $250.0 million. In connection with the foregoing, the Company's Board of Directors has approved a share repurchase program that authorizes us to repurchase up to $300.0 million in shares of our common stock. We used substantially all of the proceeds from this transaction to repurchase shares of our common stock and for other corporate purposes. We have an aggregate of $59.4 million remaining for repurchases under our Board-approved repurchase plan. In the future we may consider using excess cash generated from operations to repurchase shares of our common stock when trading at attractive prices. Such stock repurchases may be made in the open market, block trades or privately-negotiated transactions.
Observations on Current Market Opportunities
We believe there are market opportunities to acquire single-family rental properties through the distressed loan channel and expect the supply of non-performing loans, sub-performing loans, properties in foreclosure and REO to remain steady over the next two years as GSEs, HUD, banks and other mortgage lenders seek to dispose of their distressed inventories. We are also beginning to see opportunities in the marketplace in which entities are seeking to sell portfolios of REO properties and rental properties. We have been and will consider these REO and rental portfolio opportunities as they may provide alternative attractive avenues to grow Residential’s rental portfolio.
Despite these potential REO portfolio opportunities, we continue to believe that the distressed loan channel gives Residential a cost advantage over other acquisition channels such as foreclosure auctions and REO acquisitions, involves less competition and positions Residential to be selected as the buyer of diverse portfolios of such loans since Residential is not geographically constrained. Residential’s preferred resolution methodology is to modify the sub-performing and non-performing loans. We believe modification followed by refinancing generates near-term cash flows, provides the highest possible economic outcome for Residential and is a socially responsible business strategy because it keeps more families in their homes.
24
Metrics Affecting Our Consolidated Results
As described above, our operating results depend heavily on Residential’s operating results. Residential’s results are affected by various factors, some of which are beyond our control, including the following:
Revenues
Residential’s revenues primarily consist of the following:
i. | Net realized gain on mortgage loans. Residential records net realized gains, including the reclassification of previously accumulated net unrealized gains, upon the liquidation of a loan which may consist of short sale, third party sale of the underlying property, refinancing or full debt pay-off of the loan. We expect the timeline to liquidate loans will vary significantly by loan, which could result in fluctuations in revenue recognition and operating performance from period to period. Additionally, the proceeds from loan liquidations may vary significantly depending on the resolution methodology. Residential generally expects to collect proceeds of loan liquidations in cash and, thereafter, have no continuing involvement with the asset. |
ii. | Net unrealized gains from the conversion of loans to REO. Upon conversion of loans to REO, Residential marks the properties to the most recent market value. The difference between the carrying value of the asset at the time of conversion and the most recent market value, based on BPOs, is recorded in Residential's statement of operations as net unrealized gain on mortgage loans. We expect the timeline to convert acquired loans into REO will vary significantly by loan, which could result in fluctuations in Residential's revenue recognition and its operating performance from period to period. The factors that may affect the timelines to foreclose upon a residential mortgage loan include, without limitation, state foreclosure timelines and deferrals associated therewith; unauthorized parties occupying the property; inadequacy of documents necessary to foreclose; bankruptcy proceedings initiated by borrowers; federal, state or local legislative action or initiatives designed to provide homeowners with assistance in avoiding residential mortgage loan foreclosures and continued declines in real estate values and/or sustained high levels of unemployment that increase the number of foreclosures and which place additional pressure and/or delays on the already overburdened judicial and administrative proceedings. |
iii. | Net unrealized gains from the change in fair value of loans. After Residential's sub-performing and non-performing mortgage loans are acquired, the fair value of each loan is adjusted in each subsequent reporting period as the loan proceeds to a particular resolution (i.e., modification, or conversion to real estate owned). As a loan approaches resolution, the resolution timeline for that loan decreases and costs embedded in the discounted cash flow model for loan servicing, foreclosure costs and property insurance are incurred and removed from future expenses. The shorter resolution timelines and reduced future expenses each increase the fair value of the loan. The increase in the value of the loan is recognized in net unrealized gain on mortgage loans in our consolidated statements of operations. The exact nature of resolution will be dependent on a number of factors that are beyond our control, including borrower willingness to pay, property value, availability of refinancing, interest rates, conditions in the financial markets, the regulatory environment and other factors. |
iv. | Net realized gain on real estate. REO properties that do not meet Residential's investment criteria are sold out of its taxable REIT subsidiary. The realized gain or loss recognized in financial statements reflects the net amount of realized and unrealized gains on sold REOs from the time of acquisition to sale completion. |
As a greater number of Residential’s REO properties are renovated and deemed suitable for rental, we expect a greater portion of its revenues will be rental revenues. We believe the key variables that will affect Residential’s rental revenues over the long term will be average occupancy and rental rates. We anticipate that a majority of Residential’s leases of single-family rental properties to tenants will be for a term of two years or less. As these leases permit the residents to leave at the end of the lease term without penalty, we anticipate Residential’s rental revenues will be affected by declines in market rents more quickly than if its leases were for longer terms. Short-term leases may result in high turnover, which involves expenses such as renovation costs and leasing expenses, or reduced rental revenues.
Although Residential seeks to lease the majority of REO properties it acquires on foreclosure, it may also sell the properties that do not meet its rental investment criteria. The real estate market and home prices will determine proceeds from any sale of real estate. In addition, while we seek to track real estate price trends and estimate the effects of those trends on the valuations of Residential’s portfolios of residential mortgage loans, future real estate values are subject to influences beyond our control.
25
Expenses
Residential's expenses have primarily consisted of rental property operating expenses, depreciation and amortization, real estate selling cost and impairment, mortgage loan servicing, interest expense, general and administrative expenses, and expense reimbursement and incentive management fees under the Original AMA. Rental property operating expenses are expenses associated with Residential's ownership and operation of rental properties including expenses such as property management fees, expenses towards repairs, utility expenses on vacant properties, turnover costs, property taxes, insurance and HOA dues. Depreciation and amortization is a non-cash expense associated with the ownership of real estate and generally remains relatively consistent each year in relation to Residential's asset levels since these properties are depreciated on a straight-line basis over a fixed life. Real estate selling cost and impairment represents Residential's estimate for the costs to be incurred to sell a property and an amount that represents the carrying amount over the estimated fair value less costs to sell. Mortgage loan servicing costs are primarily for servicing fees, foreclosure fees and advances of residential property insurance. Interest expense consists of the costs to borrow money in connection with Residential's debt financing of its portfolios. General and administrative expenses consist of the costs related to the general operation and overall administration of Residential's and our business. Historically, expense reimbursement consisted primarily of our employee salaries in direct correlation to the services they provided on Residential’s behalf and other personnel costs and corporate overhead. We were not reimbursed by Residential for certain general and administrative expenses pertaining to stock-based compensation and our expenditures that were not for the benefit of Residential. Under the new AMA, there are no general expense reimbursements. The incentive management fees consist of compensation due to us. Historically, this was based on the amount of cash available for distribution to Residential’s stockholders for each period. Under the new AMA, the management fees are based on Residential's invested capital and leased properties. The expense reimbursement and incentive management fee are eliminated in consolidation but increase our net income by reducing the amount of net income attributable to noncontrolling interest.
Other factors affecting our consolidated results
We expect Residential’s results of operations to be affected by various additional factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the following:
Acquisitions
Residential’s operating results will depend on our ability to source sub-performing and non-performing loans, as well as other residential mortgage loans and REO property assets. We believe that there is currently a large supply of sub-performing and non-performing mortgage loans available to Residential for acquisition.
Generally, we expect that Residential’s mortgage loan portfolio may grow at an uneven pace, as opportunities to acquire distressed residential mortgage loans may be irregularly timed and may at times involve large portfolios of loans, and the timing and extent of Residential's success in acquiring such loans cannot be predicted.
Financing
Our ability to grow Residential’s business is dependent on the availability of adequate financing including additional equity financing, debt financing or both in order to meet Residential’s objectives. We intend to leverage Residential’s investments with debt, the level of which may vary based upon the particular characteristics of its portfolio and on market conditions. To the extent available at the relevant time, Residential’s financing sources may include bank credit facilities, warehouse lines of credit, structured financing arrangements and repurchase agreements, among others. We may also seek to raise additional capital for Residential through public or private offerings of debt or equity securities, depending upon market conditions. To qualify as a REIT under the Code, Residential will need to distribute at least 90% of its taxable income each year to its stockholders. This distribution requirement limits its ability to retain earnings and thereby replenish or increase capital to support its activities.
26
Resolution Activities
Three months ended March 31, 2014 | Three months ended March 31, 2015 | ||||
Mortgage Loans (1) | |||||
Beginning balance | 8,054 | 10,963 | |||
Acquisitions | 4,207 | — | |||
Dispositions | (116 | ) | (150 | ) | |
Mortgage loan conversions to REO | (637 | ) | (728 | ) | |
Reversions to mortgage loans (2) | 1 | 4 | |||
Ending balance | 11,509 | 10,089 | |||
Modifications | 81 | 126 | |||
Loan reinstatements | 19 | 67 | |||
Real Estate Owned | |||||
Beginning balance | 262 | 3,960 | |||
Acquisitions | — | — | |||
Dispositions | (2 | ) | (254 | ) | |
Mortgage loan conversions to REO | 637 | 728 | |||
Reversions to mortgage loans | (1 | ) | (4 | ) | |
Ending balance | 896 | 4,430 | |||
Leased | 35 | 587 | |||
Renovations complete | 17 | 151 | |||
Renovations in process | 48 | 116 | |||
Evaluating strategy/held for sale | 796 | 3,576 | |||
896 | 4,430 |
_____________
(1) | Excludes mortgage loans held for sale. |
(2) | Subsequent to the foreclosure sale, we may be notified that the foreclosure sale was invalidated for certain reasons. |
In addition, as of March 31, 2015, 181 of Residential's mortgage loans were on trial modification plans, compared to 207 mortgage loans on trial modification plans as of December 31, 2014.
Portfolio size
The size of Residential’s investment portfolio will also impact operating results. Generally, as the size of Residential’s investment portfolio grows, the amount of revenue it expects to generate will increase. A growing investment portfolio, however, will drive increased expenses including possibly higher servicing fees, property management fees and fees payable to us. Residential may also incur additional interest expense if it incurs additional debt to finance the purchase of its assets.
Existing Portfolio
We advised Residential and conducted portfolio analysis and the bidding process to facilitate the acquisition and growth of Residential’s portfolio of residential mortgage loans as follows:
During 2014 and 2013, Residential completed the acquisition of an aggregate of 15,817 residential mortgage loans, substantially all of which were non-performing, and 277 REO properties having an aggregate unpaid principal balance (“UPB”) of approximately $4.2 billion and an aggregate market value of underlying properties of approximately $3.6 billion. The aggregate purchase price for these acquisitions was approximately $2.4 billion. Residential did not complete any portfolio acquisitions in the first quarter of 2015.
27
Throughout this report, all unpaid principal balance and market value amounts for the portfolios Residential has acquired are provided as of the applicable “cut-off” date for each transaction unless otherwise indicated. We refer to the assets underlying Residential’s completed acquisitions as Residential’s “Existing Portfolio.” The Existing Portfolio does not include assets acquired as REO. As defined in this report, Residential's “Existing Portfolio” does not include the 99 re-performing mortgage loans having an aggregate UPB of approximately $17.5 million and an aggregate market value of underlying properties of approximately $22.1 million as of March 31, 2015, which are considered “Mortgage loans held for sale.”
Residential’s sub-performing and non-performing mortgage loans become REO properties when it has obtained legal title to the property upon completion of the foreclosure. Additionally, some of the portfolios Residential purchases may, from time to time, contain a small number of residential mortgage loans that have already been converted to REO.
As of March 31, 2015, Residential had 4,430 REO properties, consisting of 3,464 REO properties held for use and 966 held for sale. Of the 3,464 REO properties held for use, 587 properties had been rented and were occupied by tenants, 151 were being listed for rent and 116 were in varying stages of renovation. With respect to the remaining 2,610 REO properties held for use, Residential will make a final determination whether each property meets its rental profile after (a) applicable state redemption periods have expired, (b) the foreclosure sale has been ratified, (c) Residential has recorded the deed for the property, (d) utilities have been activated and (e) Residential has secured access for interior inspection. A majority of the REO properties are subject to state regulations which require Residential to await the expiration of a redemption period before a foreclosure can be finalized. Residential includes these redemption periods in its pricing which generally reduces the price Residential pays for the mortgage loans. Once the redemption period expires, Residential immediately proceeds to record the new deed, take possession of the property, activate utilities, and start the inspection process in order to make its final determination on whether to rent or liquidate the property. If an REO property meets Residential’s rental investment criteria, Residential determines the extent of renovations that are needed to generate an optimal rent and maintain consistency of renovation specifications for future branding. If it is determined that the REO property will not meet Residential’s rental investment criteria, the property is listed for sale, in some instances after renovations are made to optimize the sale proceeds. As of March 31, 2014, Residential had 852 REO properties held for use. Of these properties, 35 had been rented, 17 were being listed for rent and 48 were in various stages of renovation. With respect to the remaining 752 REO properties at March 31, 2014, Residential was in the process of determining whether these properties would meet its rental profile. Additionally, 44 REO properties owned as of March 31, 2014 were held for sale.
The following table sets forth a summary of Residential's REO properties as of March 31, 2015 ($ in thousands):
28
State / District | Number of properties | Carrying value (1) | Weighted average age in years (2) | ||||
Alabama | 27 | $ | 4,011 | 23 | |||
Alaska | 1 | 185 | 28 | ||||
Arizona | 106 | 17,492 | 22 | ||||
Arkansas | 50 | 4,459 | 31 | ||||
California | 595 | 178,339 | 33 | ||||
Colorado | 29 | 6,125 | 25 | ||||
Connecticut | 28 | 5,265 | 46 | ||||
Delaware | 11 | 2,033 | 34 | ||||
District of Columbia | 1 | 242 | 103 | ||||
Florida | 799 | 120,791 | 24 | ||||
Georgia | 170 | 21,217 | 21 | ||||
Hawaii | 2 | 339 | 20 | ||||
Idaho | 11 | 1,374 | 30 | ||||
Illinois | 409 | 60,909 | 42 | ||||
Indiana | 162 | 18,083 | 32 | ||||
Iowa | 8 | 547 | 58 | ||||
Kansas | 28 | 2,243 | 47 | ||||
Kentucky | 57 | 6,113 | 32 | ||||
Louisiana | 21 | 2,154 | 27 | ||||
Maine | 15 | 1,659 | 117 | ||||
Maryland | 128 | 24,811 | 34 | ||||
Massachusetts | 39 | 7,343 | 79 | ||||
Michigan | 89 | 9,715 | 46 | ||||
Minnesota | 74 | 12,147 | 39 | ||||
Mississippi | 11 | 1,051 | 27 | ||||
Missouri | 77 | 6,894 | 42 | ||||
Montana | 5 | 1,010 | 29 | ||||
Nebraska | 8 | 1,213 | 44 | ||||
Nevada | 15 | 2,037 | 16 | ||||
New Hampshire | 14 | 2,154 | 59 | ||||
New Jersey | 56 | 8,970 | 67 | ||||
New Mexico | 30 | 3,860 | 21 | ||||
New York | 55 | 10,062 | 69 | ||||
North Carolina | 257 | 30,306 | 19 | ||||
Ohio | 130 | 14,757 | 41 | ||||
Oklahoma | 22 | 2,293 | 30 | ||||
Oregon | 10 | 1,595 | 29 | ||||
Pennsylvania | 217 | 28,154 | 52 | ||||
Rhode Island | 54 | 6,842 | 76 | ||||
South Carolina | 103 | 11,273 | 23 | ||||
South Dakota | 2 | 295 | 52 | ||||
Tennessee | 77 | 9,200 | 23 | ||||
Texas | 144 | 17,979 | 22 | ||||
Utah | 70 | 12,560 | 28 | ||||
Vermont | 3 | 548 | 142 | ||||
Virginia | 52 | 13,536 | 26 | ||||
Washington | 26 | 5,281 | 37 | ||||
West Virginia | 3 | 647 | 25 | ||||
Wisconsin | 128 | 14,371 | 49 | ||||
Wyoming | 1 | $ | 275 | 21 | |||
Total | 4,430 | $ | 714,759 | 34 |
29
_____________
(1) | The carrying value of an asset is based on historical cost which generally consists of the market value at the time of foreclosure sale plus renovation costs, net of any accumulated depreciation. |
(2) | Weighted average age is based on the age weighted by carrying value for each state. |
The remainder of Residential’s Existing Portfolio consists of a diversified pool of sub-performing and non-performing residential mortgage loans with the underlying properties located across the United States. The aggregate purchase price of Residential’s Existing Portfolio for acquisitions completed through March 31, 2015 was 67% of the aggregate market value, as determined by the most recent BPO provided by the applicable seller for each property in the respective portfolio as of its cut-off date. We cannot assure you that the BPOs accurately reflected the actual market value of the related property at the purported time or accurately reflect such market value today.
As of March 31, 2015, the aggregate carrying value of Residential's Existing Portfolio was $1.9 billion (which does not include the carrying value of Residential's REO properties of an additional $714.8 million). The carrying value of mortgage loans is based on our proprietary pricing model. The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of Residential's mortgage loans are discount rates, forecasts of future home prices, alternate resolution probabilities and foreclosure timelines. Significant changes in any of these inputs in isolation could result in a significant change to the fair value measurement. For a more complete description of the fair value measurements and the factors that may significantly affect the carrying value of Residential's assets, please see Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements.
The table below provides a summary of the sub-performing and non-performing residential mortgage loans in Residential’s Existing Portfolio based on the respective UPB and respective market values of underlying properties as of March 31, 2015 ($ in thousands):
Location | Loan count | UPB | Market value of underlying properties (1) | Weighted average market LTV (2) | ||||||
Alabama | 56 | $ | 8,359 | $ | 7,103 | 177.5 | % | |||
Alaska | 3 | 672 | 1,011 | 68.8 | % | |||||
Arizona | 124 | 35,523 | 32,751 | 120.6 | % | |||||
Arkansas | 49 | 3,883 | 4,572 | 107.2 | % | |||||
California | 1108 | 533,355 | 571,934 | 105.8 | % | |||||
Colorado | 49 | 12,939 | 13,940 | 101.4 | % | |||||
Connecticut | 134 | 41,203 | 36,826 | 141.5 | % | |||||
Delaware | 57 | 10,901 | 9,626 | 132.7 | % | |||||
Dist. of Columbia | 66 | 17,358 | 20,857 | 107.1 | % | |||||
Florida | 1977 | 482,614 | 400,789 | 141.5 | % | |||||
Georgia | 248 | 45,660 | 40,991 | 133.1 | % | |||||
Hawaii | 53 | 27,836 | 28,591 | 104.5 | % | |||||
Idaho | 31 | 7,420 | 6,790 | 133.3 | % | |||||
Illinois | 318 | 79,353 | 63,784 | 185.9 | % | |||||
Indiana | 241 | 30,447 | 27,761 | 122.4 | % | |||||
Iowa | 24 | 2,030 | 2,178 | 102.8 | % | |||||
Kansas | 24 | 2,584 | 3,004 | 105.6 | % | |||||
Kentucky | 47 | 5,722 | 5,221 | 120.3 | % | |||||
Louisiana | 38 | 6,491 | 6,846 | 111.6 | % | |||||
Maine | 37 | 6,915 | 6,877 | 110.3 | % | |||||
Maryland | 581 | 155,135 | 127,474 | 142.9 | % | |||||
Massachusetts | 271 | 74,420 | 74,619 | 115.8 | % | |||||
Michigan | 79 | 12,646 | 12,639 | 164.5 | % | |||||
Minnesota | 38 | 8,015 | 8,173 | 122.1 | % | |||||
Mississippi | 25 | 2,897 | 2,845 | 114.2 | % | |||||
Missouri | 71 | 6,817 | 5,868 | 171.3 | % |
30
Montana | 2 | 461 | 560 | 84.3 | % | |||||
Nebraska | 4 | 465 | 440 | 105.9 | % | |||||
Nevada | 230 | 73,018 | 56,329 | 143.4 | % | |||||
New Hampshire | 11 | 3,013 | 3,200 | 100.8 | % | |||||
New Jersey | 1062 | 318,192 | 250,343 | 157.5 | % | |||||
New Mexico | 123 | 17,473 | 17,040 | 112.6 | % | |||||
New York | 720 | 248,166 | 254,231 | 113.9 | % | |||||
North Carolina | 215 | 28,655 | 27,136 | 119.2 | % | |||||
North Dakota | 1 | 123 | 140 | 87.9 | % | |||||
Ohio | 113 | 16,575 | 14,475 | 282.2 | % | |||||
Oklahoma | 32 | 4,136 | 4,214 | 122.6 | % | |||||
Oregon | 103 | 30,424 | 28,364 | 116.5 | % | |||||
Pennsylvania | 256 | 46,795 | 39,820 | 143.0 | % | |||||
Puerto Rico | 2 | 218 | 285 | 77.2 | % | |||||
Rhode Island | 49 | 11,290 | 6,377 | 230.1 | % | |||||
South Carolina | 189 | 33,746 | 31,193 | 119.2 | % | |||||
South Dakota | 3 | 395 | 325 | 132.0 | % | |||||
Tennessee | 75 | 11,062 | 10,971 | 121.2 | % | |||||
Texas | 422 | 48,992 | 68,197 | 83.3 | % | |||||
Utah | 52 | 11,463 | 11,989 | 101.9 | % | |||||
Vermont | 9 | 1,451 | 1,383 | 128.9 | % | |||||
Virginia | 136 | 44,543 | 42,928 | 118.6 | % | |||||
Washington | 466 | 126,931 | 122,573 | 115.6 | % | |||||
West Virginia | 8 | 1,009 | 838 | 128.0 | % | |||||
Wisconsin | 57 | 8,331 | 6,587 | 154.3 | % | |||||
Total mortgage loans | 10,089 | $ | 2,708,122 | $ | 2,523,008 | 130.3 | % |
_____________
(1) | Market value is based on the most recent BPO provided to Residential by the applicable seller for each property in the respective portfolio as of its cut-off date or an updated BPO received since the acquisition was completed. Although we performed diligence on a representative sample of the properties to confirm the accuracy of the BPOs provided by the sellers, we cannot assure you that the BPOs set forth in this table accurately reflected the actual market value of the related property at the purported time or accurately reflect such market value today. |
(2) | Weighted average loan to value (LTV) is based on the loan to value weighted by unpaid principal balance for each state. |
Summary Management Reporting Information
In addition to evaluating our consolidated financial performance, we also evaluate the operations of AAMC on a stand-alone basis because our financial statements consolidate the results of Residential and NewSource under U.S. GAAP.
In evaluating our operating performance and managing our business under the Original AMA, we consider the incentive management fees and, if any, reimbursement of expenses paid to us by Residential under our AMA as well as our stand-alone operating expenses. We maintain our internal management reporting on this basis. The following table presents our consolidating balance sheet and statement of operations which are reconciled to U.S. GAAP.
The following tables include non-GAAP performance measures that we believe are useful to assist investors in gaining an understanding of the trends and operating results for our business. This information should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for our financial results determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
31
Altisource Asset Management Corporation
Consolidating Statement of Operations
Three months ended March 31, 2015
(In thousands)
Residential (GAAP) | NewSource Stand-alone (Non-GAAP) | AAMC Stand-alone (Non-GAAP) | Consolidating Entries | AAMC Consolidated (GAAP) | |||||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||||||||
Rental revenues | $ | 1,400 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,400 | |||||
Net unrealized gain on mortgage loans | 61,134 | — | — | — | 61,134 | ||||||||||
Net realized gain on mortgage loans | 15,382 | — | — | — | 15,382 | ||||||||||
Net realized gain on re-performing mortgage loans | 151 | — | — | — | 151 | ||||||||||
Net realized gain on real estate | 10,608 | — | — | — | 10,608 | ||||||||||
Interest income | 240 | 160 | — | (160 | ) | 240 | |||||||||
Incentive management fee | — | — | 14,900 | (14,900 | ) | — | |||||||||
Expense reimbursements | — | — | 960 | (960 | ) | — | |||||||||
Total revenues | 88,915 | 160 | 15,860 | (16,020 | ) | 88,915 | |||||||||
Expenses: | |||||||||||||||
Residential property operating expenses | 12,459 | — | — | — | 12,459 | ||||||||||
Real estate depreciation and amortization | 998 | — | — | — | 998 | ||||||||||
Real estate selling costs and impairment | 14,691 | — | — | — | 14,691 | ||||||||||
Mortgage loan servicing costs | 18,266 | — | — | — | 18,266 | ||||||||||
Interest expense | 11,643 | — | — | (160 | ) | 11,483 | |||||||||
General and administrative | 4,379 | 75 | 6,336 | — | 10,790 | ||||||||||
Related party general and administrative | 16,052 | 210 | 2,371 | (17,860 | ) | 773 | |||||||||
Total expenses | 78,488 | 285 | 8,707 | (18,020 | ) | 69,460 | |||||||||
Other income | 2,000 | — | — | (2,000 | ) | — | |||||||||
Income before income taxes | 12,427 | (125 | ) | 7,153 | — | 19,455 | |||||||||
Income tax expense | 3 | — | 140 | — | 143 | ||||||||||
Net income | 12,424 | (125 | ) | 7,013 | — | 19,312 | |||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in consolidated affiliate | — | — | — | (12,424 | ) | (12,424 | ) | ||||||||
Net income attributable to common stockholders | $ | 12,424 | $ | (125 | ) | $ | 7,013 | $ | (12,424 | ) | $ | 6,888 |
32
Altisource Asset Management Corporation
Consolidating Statement of Operations
Three months ended March 31, 2014
(In thousands)
Residential (GAAP) | NewSource Stand-alone (Non-GAAP) | AAMC Stand-alone (Non-GAAP) | Consolidating Entries | AAMC Consolidated (GAAP) | |||||||||||
Revenues: | |||||||||||||||
Rental revenues | $ | 69 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 69 | |||||
Net unrealized gain on mortgage loans | 65,130 | — | — | — | 65,130 | ||||||||||
Net realized gain on mortgage loans | 9,321 | — | — | — | 9,321 | ||||||||||
Interest income | 108 | — | — | — | 108 | ||||||||||
Incentive management fee | — | — | 10,911 | (10,911 | ) | — | |||||||||
Expense reimbursements | — | — | 1,780 | (1,780 | ) | — | |||||||||
Total revenues | 74,628 | — | 12,691 | (12,691 | ) | 74,628 | |||||||||
Expenses: | |||||||||||||||
Residential property operating expenses | 1,050 | — | — | — | 1,050 | ||||||||||
Real estate depreciation and amortization | 48 | — | — | — | 48 | ||||||||||
Real estate selling costs and impairment | 354 | — | — | — | 354 | ||||||||||
Mortgage loan servicing costs | 11,437 | — | — | — | 11,437 | ||||||||||
Interest expense | 5,708 | — | — | — | 5,708 | ||||||||||
General and administrative | 1,038 | 30 | 4,533 | — | 5,601 | ||||||||||
Related party general and administrative | 12,632 | 311 | 671 | (12,691 | ) | 923 | |||||||||
Total expenses | 32,267 | 341 | 5,204 | (12,691 | ) | 25,121 | |||||||||
Income before income taxes | 42,361 | (341 | ) | 7,487 | — | 49,507 | |||||||||
Income tax expense | 448 | — | 318 | — | 766 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 41,913 | (341 | ) | 7,169 | — | 48,741 | |||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in consolidated affiliate | — | — | — | (41,913 | ) | (41,913 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders | $ | 41,913 | $ | (341 | ) | $ | 7,169 | $ | (41,913 | ) | $ | 6,828 |
33
Altisource Asset Management Corporation
Consolidating Balance Sheet
March 31, 2015
(In thousands)
Residential (GAAP) | NewSource stand-alone (non-GAAP) | AAMC Stand-alone (Non-GAAP) | Consolidating Entries | AAMC Consolidated (GAAP) | |||||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||||
Real estate held for use: | |||||||||||||||
Land | $ | 21,267 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 21,267 | |||||
Rental residential properties, net | 86,206 | — | — | — | 86,206 | ||||||||||
Real estate owned | 456,479 | — | — | — | 456,479 | ||||||||||
Total real estate held for use, net | 563,952 | — | — | — | 563,952 | ||||||||||
Real estate assets held for sale | 150,807 | — | — | — | 150,807 | ||||||||||
Mortgage loans | 1,853,495 | — | — | — | 1,853,495 | ||||||||||
Mortgage loans held for sale | 12,485 | — | — | — | 12,485 | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 53,246 | 5,103 | 40,037 | — | 98,386 | ||||||||||
Restricted cash | 14,766 | — | — | — | 14,766 | ||||||||||
Accounts receivable | 10,398 | 324 | 1 | (324 | ) | 10,399 | |||||||||
Related party receivables | 24,530 | 14,991 | 44,759 | (61,750 | ) | 22,530 | |||||||||
Investment in affiliate | 18,000 | — | 2,000 | (20,000 | ) | — | |||||||||
Deferred leasing and financing costs, net | 5,384 | — | — | — | 5,384 | ||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 672 | 26 | 1,554 | 9 | 2,261 | ||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 2,707,735 | $ | 20,444 | $ | 88,351 | $ | (82,065 | ) | $ | 2,734,465 | ||||
Liabilities: | |||||||||||||||
Repurchase agreements | $ | 929,287 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 929,287 | |||||
Other secured borrowings | 379,840 | — | — | (14,991 | ) | 364,849 | |||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 42,686 | 1,594 | 4,358 | (324 | ) | 48,314 | |||||||||
Related party payables | 52,541 | 1,151 | 2,159 | (46,759 | ) | 9,092 | |||||||||
Total liabilities | 1,404,354 | 2,745 | 6,517 | (62,074 | ) | 1,351,542 | |||||||||
Commitments and contingencies | |||||||||||||||
Preferred stock | — | — | 248,979 | — | 248,979 | ||||||||||
Equity: | |||||||||||||||
Common stock | 572 | — | 25 | (572 | ) | 25 | |||||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 1,227,175 | 20,000 | 15,048 | (1,247,175 | ) | 15,048 | |||||||||
Retained earnings/(accumulated deficit) | 75,634 | (2,301 | ) | 63,301 | (75,625 | ) | 61,009 | ||||||||
Treasury stock | — | — | (245,519 | ) | — | (245,519 | ) | ||||||||
Total stockholders' equity | 1,303,381 | 17,699 | (167,145 | ) | (1,323,372 | ) | (169,437 | ) | |||||||
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated affiliate | — | — | — | 1,303,381 | 1,303,381 | ||||||||||
Total equity | 1,303,381 | 17,699 | (167,145 | ) | (19,991 | ) | 1,133,944 | ||||||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 2,707,735 | $ | 20,444 | $ | 88,351 | $ | (82,065 | ) | $ | 2,734,465 |
34
Altisource Asset Management Corporation
Consolidating Balance Sheet
December 31, 2014
(In thousands)
Residential (GAAP) | NewSource stand-alone (non-GAAP) | AAMC Stand-alone (Non-GAAP) | Consolidating Entries | AAMC Consolidated (GAAP) | |||||||||||
Assets: | |||||||||||||||
Real estate held for use: | |||||||||||||||
Land | $ | 14,424 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 14,424 | |||||
Rental residential properties, net | 60,908 | — | — | — | 60,908 | ||||||||||
Real estate owned | 457,045 | — | — | — | 457,045 | ||||||||||
Total real estate held for use, net | 532,377 | — | — | — | 532,377 | ||||||||||
Real estate assets held for sale | 92,230 | — | — | — | 92,230 | ||||||||||
Mortgage loans | 1,959,044 | — | — | — | 1,959,044 | ||||||||||
Mortgage loans held for sale | 12,535 | 12,535 | |||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 66,166 | 6,026 | 44,590 | — | 116,782 | ||||||||||
Restricted cash | 13,282 | — | — | — | 13,282 | ||||||||||
Accounts receivable | 10,313 | 919 | 1 | (165 | ) | 11,068 | |||||||||
Related party receivables | 17,491 | 14,991 | 28,512 | (43,503 | ) | 17,491 | |||||||||
Investment in affiliate | 18,000 | — | 2,000 | (20,000 | ) | — | |||||||||
Deferred leasing and financing costs, net | 4,251 | — | — | — | 4,251 | ||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 373 | 3 | 1,262 | — | 1,638 | ||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 2,726,062 | $ | 21,939 | $ | 76,365 | $ | (63,668 | ) | $ | 2,760,698 | ||||
Liabilities: | |||||||||||||||
Repurchase agreement | $ | 1,015,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,015,000 | |||||
Other secured borrowings | 339,082 | (15,000 | ) | 324,082 | |||||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 11,678 | 3,173 | 2,040 | (165 | ) | 16,726 | |||||||||
Related party payables | 33,391 | 941 | 349 | (28,512 | ) | 6,169 | |||||||||
Total liabilities | 1,399,151 | 4,114 | 2,389 | (43,677 | ) | 1,361,977 | |||||||||
Commitments and contingencies | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||
Preferred stock | — | — | 248,927 | — | 248,927 | ||||||||||
Equity: | |||||||||||||||
Common stock | 572 | — | 25 | (572 | ) | 25 | |||||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 1,227,091 | 20,000 | 14,152 | (1,247,091 | ) | 14,152 | |||||||||
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) | 99,248 | (2,175 | ) | 56,340 | (99,239 | ) | 54,174 | ||||||||
Treasury stock | — | — | (245,468 | ) | — | (245,468 | ) | ||||||||
Total stockholders' equity | 1,326,911 | 17,825 | (174,951 | ) | (1,346,902 | ) | (177,117 | ) | |||||||
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated affiliate | — | — | — | 1,326,911 | 1,326,911 | ||||||||||
Total equity | 1,326,911 | 17,825 | (174,951 | ) | (19,991 | ) | 1,149,794 | ||||||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 2,726,062 | $ | 21,939 | $ | 76,365 | $ | (63,668 | ) | $ | 2,760,698 |
Primary driver of our stand-alone operating results
As described above under “— Factors affecting our consolidated results,” our incentive management fees have been directly linked to the results of Residential which we expect will be affected by various factors including, but not limited to, the number and performance of Residential's mortgage loan acquisitions, its ability to use financing to grow its business, its ability to convert mortgage loans into residential rental properties, its operating expenses, the success of its loan resolution methodologies and the size of its portfolio. The extent to which we have been successful in managing these factors for Residential has affected our ability to generate incentive management fees under the Original AMA, which has been our sole source of income other than the reimbursement of our expenses pursuant to the Original AMA. Under the Original AMA, as Residential generated taxable income, our incentive management fees provided us with a share of Residential's cash available for distribution to its stockholders. If there was a decline in the cash distributable by Residential to its stockholders in any period, or if Residential was unable to make distributions to its stockholders in any period, under the Original AMA, the amount
35
of our incentive management fees would have been adversely affected.
Under the new AMA, which is effective commencing in the second quarter of 2015, we have a new fee structure in which we receive (a) the quarterly base management fee, (b) the quarterly incentive fee and (c) the quarterly conversion fee for properties leased during the quarter. Although the quarterly incentive fee is earned only if Residential exceeds a 7% return on invested capital and the conversion fee is affected by the number of properties we rent for the first time in a given quarter, the base management fee provides us with quarterly minimum revenues that re meant to cover our employment and other overhead costs and expenses. Our performance in each particular period, however, will be affected by our ability to manage Residential’s business and rental portfolio effectively. If there are declines in Residential’s performance in either return on invested capital or in growing Residential’s rental portfolio, our fees in each such period would be adversely affected.
Results of operations
The following sets forth discussion of our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014. Because the results of Residential are consolidated into our financial statements, the results of operations disclosures set forth below include the results of Residential. We eliminate all intercompany amounts in our consolidated financial statements, including the expense reimbursement and incentive management fees, if any, paid or owed to us by Residential. However, the effect of such amounts received from Residential is still recognized in net income attributable to our stockholders through the adjustment for earnings attributable to noncontrolling interest.
Three months ended March 31, 2015 versus three months ended March 31, 2014
Rental revenues
Residential's rental revenues increased to $1.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014. The number of leased properties increased to 587 at March 31, 2015 from 35 at March 31, 2014. Residential also had an additional 151 properties listed for rent at March 31, 2015. We expect Residential to generate increasing rental revenues as it continues to renovate, list and rent additional residential rental properties. Residential's rental revenues will depend primarily on occupancy levels and rental rates for its residential rental properties. Because Residential's lease terms generally are expected to be two or fewer years, Residential's occupancy levels and rental rates will be highly dependent on localized residential rental markets, its ability to manage maintenance and repair costs and its renters’ desire to remain in its properties.
Net unrealized gain on mortgage loans
Residential's net unrealized gains on mortgage loans decreased to $61.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 from $65.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014. This decrease was primarily related to lower unrealized gains on loans converted to REO status and friction cost due to Residential’s servicing transfers during the quarter. The net unrealized gains for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 can be broken down into the following two components:
• | First, Residential recognized unrealized gains driven by a material change in loan status of $18.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to $23.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, Residential converted 724 mortgage loans to REO status compared to 636 mortgage loans converted to REO status during the three months ended March 31, 2014. Upon conversion of these mortgage loans to REO, Residential marked these properties to the most recent market value, less estimated selling costs in the case of REO held for sale; and |
• | Second, Residential recognized $42.7 million in unrealized gains for the three months ended March 31, 2015 from the net increase in the fair value of loans during the period compared to $41.6 million in unrealized gains during the three months ended March 31, 2014. Adjustments to the fair value of loans after acquisition represent, among other factors, a reduction in the time remaining to complete the foreclosure process due to the passage of time since acquisition and a reduction in future foreclosure expenses to the extent Residential has already incurred them. The reduction in time remaining to complete the foreclosure is driven by the completion of activities in the foreclosure process after Residential acquired the loans. This reduction in timeline results in reduced carrying costs and reduced future expenses for the loans, each of which increases the fair value of the loans. The increase in the value of the loans is recognized in net unrealized gain on mortgage loans in our consolidated statements of operations. |
36
Through Residential's resolution of non-performing loans, its Existing Portfolio has decreased from 10,963 loans at December 31, 2014 to 10,089 loans at March 31, 2015. The fair value of mortgage loans is based on a number of factors which are difficult to predict and may be subject to adverse changes in value depending on the financial condition of borrowers, as well as geographic, economic, market and other conditions. Therefore, Residential may experience unrealized losses on its mortgage loans in the future.
Net realized gain on mortgage loans
Residential's net realized gains on mortgage loans increased to $15.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 from $9.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014. Residential disposed of 150 mortgage loans in the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 116 mortgage loans in the three months ended March 31, 2014, primarily from short sales and foreclosure sales.
Net realized gain on real estate
Net realized gains on real estate were $10.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015, during which Residential disposed of 254 residential properties. Residential disposed of two residential properties during the three months ended March 31, 2014. There were no significant gains or losses on the dispositions in 2014.
Interest income
Interest income increased to $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 as Residential accreted $0.2 million into interest income with respect to the re-performing loans acquired in June 2014. Interest income was $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014.
Residential property operating expenses
Residential incurred $12.5 million of residential property operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 with 4,430 REO properties and 587 leased properties at March 31, 2015 compared to 896 REO properties and 35 leased properties at March 31, 2014. Residential expects to incur increasing residential property operating expenses as it converts more mortgage loans to, and owns more residential properties. Residential's residential property operating expenses for rental properties will be dependent primarily on residential property taxes and insurance, property management fees, HOA dues, and repair and maintenance expenditures. Residential's residential property operating expenses for properties held while it is evaluating strategy will be dependent primarily on residential property taxes and insurance, property management fees, HOA dues, utilities, and landscaping.
Real estate depreciation and amortization
Residential incurred $1.0 million of real estate depreciation and amortization for the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to a nominal amount of real estate depreciation and amortization for the three months ended March 31, 2014. We expect Residential to incur increasing real estate depreciation and amortization as it converts more mortgage loans to, and owns more, residential rental properties. Real estate depreciation and amortization are non-cash expenditures which generally are not expected to be indicative of the market value or condition of Residential's residential rental properties.
Real estate selling costs and impairment
Real estate selling costs of REO held for sale were $10.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014. Residential also recognized $4.1 million REO valuation impairment for the three months ended March 31, 2015. There was no impairment recognized for the three months ended March 31, 2014. Residential records residential properties held for sale at the lower of either the carrying amount of REO or its estimated fair value less estimated selling costs. If the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value, as adjusted, Residential records impairment equal to the amount of such excess. If an increase in fair value is noted at a subsequent measurement date, a gain is recognized to the extent of any previous impairment recognized.
37
Mortgage loan servicing costs
Residential incurred $18.3 million of mortgage loan servicing costs primarily for servicing fees, foreclosure fees and advances of residential property insurance for the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to $11.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014. Residential incurs mortgage loan servicing and foreclosure costs as its mortgage loan servicers provide servicing for its loans and pay for advances relating to property insurance, foreclosure attorney fees, foreclosure costs and property preservation. Residential's loan servicing costs could be higher in a given period if the number of mortgage loans in Residential's portfolio increases.
Interest expense
Residential incurred $11.5 million of interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2015 related to borrowings under its repurchase agreements (including amortization of deferred financing costs) compared to $5.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014. The interest rate under Residential's repurchase agreements is subject to change based on changes in the relevant index. Market interest rates are currently at historically low levels, and any increase in market interest rates will cause Residential's contractual interest expense to increase. We also expect Residential's interest expense to increase as its debt increases to fund and/or leverage its ownership of existing and additional portfolios.
General and administrative expenses
General and administrative expenses increased to $10.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 from $5.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014, primarily due to increased litigation-based expenses and higher professional fees. The effect of these increases was partially offset by a decrease in compensation costs resulting from a non-employee restricted stock award accounted for at fair value and lower acquisition costs..
Related party general and administrative expenses
Residential and we incurred $0.8 million of related party general and administrative expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2015 compared to $0.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014. Related party general and administrative expenses primarily consist of salaries and benefits attributable to services provided on behalf of our business, professional fees and due diligence costs related to the acquisition of loan portfolios.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in consolidated affiliate
For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, we recognized $12.4 million and $41.9 million, respectively, of net income attributable to noncontrolling interest in consolidated affiliate which is equivalent to Residential's net income because although we consolidate Residential, we have no ownership in Residential.
Incentive management fees and expense reimbursements
We recorded management incentive fees of $14.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015. These management incentive fees were calculated by taking an average of the amounts that would have been payable under the Original AMA and the amounts that would have been payable under the new AMA had it been in place during the first quarter. The agreed upon amount of such average was $15.7 million, of which we classified $0.8 million as expense reimbursement and the $14.9 million as incentive management fees.. For the three months ended March 31, 2014, we recorded management incentive fees of $10.9 million and an expense reimbursement of $1.5 million. The incentive management fees and expense reimbursements have been eliminated under U.S. GAAP in consolidation. We recorded $0.2 million and $0.3 million of expense reimbursements from NewSource that also have been eliminated in consolidation for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Historically, we have not been reimbursed by Residential for certain general and administrative expenses pertaining to stock-based compensation and our expenditures that are not for the benefit of Residential. Under the new AMA there are no general expense reimbursements. In addition to the fees described above, under the new AMA, we recorded a one-time $2.0 million fee in connection with the negotiation of the new AMA and the termination of the Original AMA that is also eliminated in consolidated for the three months ended March 31, 2015.
Liquidity and capital resources
As of March 31, 2015, we had stand-alone cash and cash equivalents of $40.0 million compared to $44.6 million as of December 31, 2014. We believe this cash is sufficient to fund our operations since we are generating incentive management
38
fees as a result of Residential paying cash dividends to its stockholders. Our only stand-alone cash expenditures to date are leasehold improvements and general and administrative expenses, including unreimbursed salaries and professional expenses.
On a consolidated basis, our cash and cash equivalents as of March 31, 2015 was $98.4 million, of which approximately $53.2 million was attributable to Residential. Residential’s liquidity reflects its ability to meet its current obligations (including its operating expenses and, when applicable, retirement of, and margin calls relating to, its financing arrangements) and make distributions to its stockholders. Residential is required to distribute at least 90% of its taxable income each year (subject to certain adjustments) to its stockholders to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. This distribution requirement limits Residential’s ability to retain earnings and thereby replenish or increase capital to support its activities. Our consolidated cash and cash equivalents as of March 31, 2015 also include $5.1 million attributable to NewSource, representing cash invested by Residential and us into NewSource in October 2013.
Residential was initially funded with $100.0 million on December 21, 2012. Since its separation, its primary sources of liquidity have been proceeds from equity offerings, borrowings under its repurchase agreements and securitization financings, interest payments it receives from its portfolio of assets, cash generated from loan liquidations and cash generated from its rental portfolio. We expect Residential’s existing business strategy will require additional debt and/or equity financing. We continue to explore a variety of financing sources to support Residential’s growth, including, but not limited to, debt financing through bank warehouse lines of credit, additional and/or amended repurchase agreements, term financing, securitization transactions and additional debt or equity offerings. Based on Residential’s current borrowing capacity, leverage ratio, and anticipated additional debt financing transactions, we believe that these sources of liquidity will be sufficient to enable it to meet anticipated short-term (one year) liquidity requirements, including paying expenses on its existing loan portfolio, funding distributions to its stockholders, paying fees to us under the new AMA and general corporate expenses. However, there can be no assurance as to how much additional financing capacity such efforts will produce, what form the financing will take or that such efforts will be successful. If we are unable to renew, replace or expand Residential’s sources of financing, its business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
To date, Residential has conducted the following equity offerings, repurchase facilities and securitization transactions:
Equity Offerings
We have facilitated Residential’s completion of three public equity offerings with aggregate net proceeds of approximately $1.1 billion. On May 1, 2013, Residential completed a public offering of 17,250,000 shares of its common stock at $18.75 per share and received net proceeds of approximately $309.5 million. On October 1, 2013, Residential completed its second public offering of 17,187,000 shares of common stock at $21.00 per share and received net proceeds of $349.4 million. On January 22, 2014, Residential completed its third public offering of 14,200,000 shares of common stock at $34.00 per share and received net proceeds of approximately $467.6 million.
Repurchase Facilities
Residential also entered into three separate repurchase agreements to finance the acquisition and ownership of residential mortgage loans and REO properties. The maximum aggregate funding available under these repurchase agreements at December 31, 2014 was $1.2 billion. Following the amendments described below, the maximum aggregate funding available to Residential under these repurchase agreements as of March 31, 2015 was $970.5 million, subject to certain sublimits, eligibility requirements and conditions precedent to each funding. As of March 31, 2015, an aggregate of $929.3 million was outstanding under Residential's repurchase agreements. All obligations of Residential’s subsidiaries under the repurchase agreements are fully guaranteed by Residential.
Each of Residential's repurchase agreements is described below:
• | Credit Suisse (“CS”) is the lender on the repurchase agreement entered into on March 22, 2013 (the “CS repurchase agreement”) with an initial aggregate maximum borrowing capacity of $100.0 million. During 2014 the CS repurchase agreement was amended on several occasions, ultimately increasing the aggregate maximum borrowing capacity to $225.0 million on December 31, 2014 with a maturity date of April 20, 2015, subject to an additional one-year extension with the approval of the lender. On April 20, 2015, Residential entered into an amended and restated repurchase agreement with CS that increased the aggregate borrowing capacity from $225.0 million to $275.0 million, increased the REO sublimit under the facility and extended the maturity date to April 18, 2016. |
39
• | Deutsche Bank (“DB”) is the lender on the repurchase agreement entered into on September 12, 2013 (the “DB repurchase agreement”). The DB repurchase agreement was amended on December 18, 2013, has an aggregate funding capacity of $250.0 million and matures on March 11, 2016. The DB repurchase agreement includes a provision that, beginning in April 2015, Residential will not be able to finance mortgage loans in excess of amounts outstanding under the facility at the end of March 2015. Therefore, Residential's aggregate funding capacity under the DB repurchase agreement was reduced to $219.7 million in April 2015, which was the amount outstanding under the facility at the time. |
• | Wells Fargo (“Wells”) is the lender on the repurchase agreement entered into on September 23, 2013 (the “Wells repurchase agreement”) with an initial aggregate maximum borrowing capacity of $200.0 million. Throughout 2013 and 2014 the Wells repurchase agreement was amended several times increasing the aggregate maximum borrowing capacity to a high of $1.0 billion, and on December 31, 2014 was reduced to $750.0 million, subject to certain sublimits, to reflect the securitization of a significant portion of Residential's non-performing loans that previously had been financed under the Wells repurchase agreement. The maturity date of the Wells repurchase agreement was March 23, 2015. However, on February 20, 2015, Residential exercised its option to extend the termination date of this facility to March 23, 2016 without any additional funding, thereby reducing Residential's aggregate funding capacity under the Wells repurchase agreement to $525.8 million which was the amount outstanding under the facility on the extension date. Residential is in discussions with Wells to further extend the repurchase agreement with an ability to obtain additional funding. No assurance can be provided that Residential will be able to renew this facility on reasonable terms, on a timely basis or at all. In the event Residential cannot extend the agreement with an ability to obtain additional funding, the advance rate will be reduced by 10% after the first 90 days of the extension term and Residential will not be entitled to draw additional funds under the facility. |
Under the terms of each repurchase agreement, as collateral for the funds Residential draws thereunder, subject to certain conditions, Residential’s operating partnership will sell to the applicable lender equity interests in the Delaware statutory trust subsidiary that owns the applicable underlying mortgage assets on Residential’s behalf, or the trust will directly sell such underlying mortgage assets. In the event the lender determines the value of the collateral has decreased, the lender has the right to initiate a margin call and require Residential to post additional collateral or to repay a portion of the outstanding borrowings. The price paid by the lender for each underlying mortgage asset Residential finances under the applicable repurchase agreement is subject to agreement between the lender and Residential and is based on a percentage of the market value of the underlying mortgage asset and depends on its delinquency status. Residential’s cost of borrowing under the repurchase agreements generally corresponds to LIBOR, or the lender interest at the lender’s cost of funds plus a margin. Residential is also required to pay certain other customary fees, administrative costs and expenses to maintain and administer the repurchase agreements.
The repurchase agreements require Residential to maintain various financial and other covenants, including maintaining a minimum adjusted tangible net worth, a maximum ratio of indebtedness to adjusted tangible net worth and specified levels of unrestricted cash. In addition, the repurchase agreements contain customary events of default.
Residential is currently in compliance with the covenants and other requirements with respect to its repurchase agreements. We monitor Residential’s banking partners’ ability to perform under the repurchase agreements and have concluded there is currently no reason to doubt that they will continue to perform under the repurchase agreements as contractually obligated.
The following table sets forth data with respect to Residential's repurchase agreements as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2015, March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2014 ($ in thousands):
Three months ended March 31, 2015 | Three months ended March 31, 2014 | Three months ended December 31, 2013 | |||||||
Balance at end of period | $ | 929,287 | $ | 699,950 | $ | 1,015,000 | |||
Maximum month-end balance outstanding during the period | 997,161 | 703,147 | 1,112,883 | ||||||
Weighted average quarterly balance | 970,513 | 666,132 | 1,055,776 |
As amended, Residential’s three repurchase agreements provide for the lenders to finance its portfolio at advance rates (or purchase prices) ranging from 40% to 80% of the “asset value” of the mortgage loans and REO properties. Under these repurchase agreements, the “asset value” generally is an amount that is based on the market value of the mortgage loan or REO property. We believe these are typical market terms which are designed to provide protection for the lender to collateralize its advances to Residential in the event the collateral declines in value. Under each of the repurchase agreements, if the carrying value of the collateral declines beyond certain limits, Residential would have to either (a) provide additional collateral or (b) repurchase certain assets under the agreement to maintain the applicable advance rate.
40
The decrease in amounts outstanding under Residential's repurchase agreements from December 31, 2014 to March 31, 2015 relate in part to amounts paid down with the proceeds from the sale of the Class A Notes. Residential's overall advance rate under the repurchase agreements declined from 55.8% at December 31, 2014 to 52.3% at March 31, 2015 due to the normal attrition of amounts outstanding under the CS Repurchase Agreement that are collateralized with secured notes issued and retained by Residential in connection with securitizations completed in 2014. Residential does not collateralize any of its repurchase facilities with cash.
Loan and Security Agreement
On April 10, 2015, Residential entered into Loan Agreement with Nomura. The purpose of the Loan Agreement is to finance Residential's beneficial ownership of REO properties. These obligations are fully guaranteed pursuant to a guaranty made by Residential in favor of Nomura. The Loan Agreement terminates on April 8, 2016. Under the terms of the Loan Agreement, subject to certain conditions, Nomura may advance funds to Residential from time to time, with such advances collateralized by REO properties. The maximum aggregate advance for the REO properties under the Loan Agreement is $100.0 million, subject to certain sublimits, eligibility requirements and conditions precedent to each funding.
The advances paid by Nomura under the Loan Agreement with respect to the REO properties from time to time will be based on a percentage of the market value of the applicable REO properties. Under the terms of the Loan Agreement, Residential is required to pay to Nomura interest based on the one-month LIBOR plus a spread and certain other customary fees, administrative costs and expenses in connection with Nomura's structuring, management and ongoing administration of the Loan Agreement.
The Loan Agreement requires Residential to maintain various financial and other covenants, including a minimum adjusted tangible net worth, a maximum ratio of indebtedness to adjusted tangible net worth and specified levels of unrestricted cash. In addition, the Loan Agreement contains events of default (subject to certain materiality thresholds and grace periods), including payment defaults, breaches of covenants and/or certain representations and warranties, cross-defaults, certain material adverse changes, bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings and other events of default customary for this type of transaction. The remedies for such events of default are also customary for this type of transaction and include the acceleration of the principal amount outstanding under the Loan Agreement and the liquidation by Nomura of the REO properties then subject to the Loan Agreement
Securitizations
On November 25, 2014, Residential completed a securitization transaction in which ARLP Securitization Trust, Series 2014-2 ("ARLP 2014-2") issued $270.8 million in Class A Notes (the “Class A Notes”) and $234.0 million in Class M Notes (the “Class M Notes”). Residential initially retained $95.8 million of the Class A Notes and all of the Class M Notes in its taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”). In February 9, 2015, Residential sold $50.7 million of the retained Class A Notes to an unrelated third party. The Class A Notes and the Class M Notes are secured solely by the non-performing mortgage loans and REO properties of ARLP 2014-2 and not by any of Residential's other assets. The assets of ARLP 2014-2 are the only source of repayment and interest on the Class A Notes and the Class M Notes. The Class A Notes and the Class M Notes mature on January 26, 2054, and Residential does not guaranty any of the obligations of ARLP 2014-2 under the terms of the Indenture governing the notes or otherwise. As of March 31, 2015, the book value of the underlying securitized assets held by ARLP 2014-2 was $332.5 million.
On September 25, 2014, Residential completed a securitization transaction in which ARLP Securitization Trust, Series 2014-1 ("ARLP 2014-1") issued $150.0 million in Class A Notes (the “Class A Notes”) and $32.0 million in Class M Notes (the “Class M Notes”). The Class A Notes and the Class M Notes are secured solely by the non-performing mortgage loans and REO properties of ARLP 2014-1 and not by any of Residential's other assets. The assets of ARLP 2014-1 are the only source of repayment and interest on the Class A Notes and the Class M Notes. The Class A Notes and the Class M Notes mature on September 25, 2044, and Residential does not guaranty any of the obligations of ARLP 2014-1 under the terms of the Indenture governing the notes or otherwise. As of March 31, 2015, the book value of the underlying securitized assets held by ARLP 2014-1 was $213.8 million.
As described above in “-Repurchase Agreements”, Residential used a portion of the proceeds of the securitizations to repurchase the non-performing loans from the repurchase facilities, as such non-performing loans were used to collateralize the securitization trusts.
41
Residential retained all of the Class M Notes issued by ARLP 2014-1 in its TRS. On September 30, 2014, pursuant to a master repurchase agreement, the TRS sold $15.0 million of the Class M Notes to NewSource, an entity in which Residential owns 100% of the outstanding preferred stock and in which we own 100% of the outstanding common stock, for a purchase price of
$15.0 million. The master repurchase agreement initially required the TRS to repurchase the Class M Notes from NewSource at a 5.0% yield on December 28, 2014, with the parties having the option to extend the master repurchase agreement for additional 89-day periods. In no event can the master repurchase agreement be extended beyond September 29, 2015. The agreement is currently due to expire on June 25, 2015.
Treasury shares
At March 31, 2015, a total of $240.6 million in shares of our common stock have been repurchased under the authorization by our Board of Directors to repurchase up to $300.0 million in shares of our common stock. Repurchased shares are held as treasury stock and are available for general corporate purposes. We have an aggregate of $59.4 million remaining for repurchases under our Board-approved repurchase plan.
Cash flows
We report and analyze our cash flows based on operating activities, investing activities and financing activities. The following table sets forth the changes in cash flows ($ in thousands):
Three months ended March 31, 2015 | Three months ended March 31, 2014 | Change | |||||||
Net cash used in operating activities | $ | (47,901 | ) | $ | (19,530 | ) | $ | (28,371 | ) |
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 80,718 | (582,881 | ) | 663,599 | |||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (51,213 | ) | 742,877 | (794,090 | ) | ||||
Total cash flows | $ | (18,396 | ) | $ | 140,466 | $ | (158,862 | ) |
The change in net cash used in operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 by Residential and us consisted primarily of gains on mortgage loans and real estate offset by related party mortgage loan servicing costs including servicing fees, foreclosure fees and advances of residential property insurance on delinquent loans, interest expense, professional fees, acquisition costs and salaries and benefits.
The change in net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 consisted primarily of Residential's investments in non-performing loan portfolios, offset by proceeds from the disposition of loans and real estate. During periods in which Residential purchases a significant number of mortgage loans and conducts substantial renovations of residential real estate, the cash used in investing activities may exceed cash provided by investing activities.
The change in net cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2015 included Residential's net repayment of borrowings under repurchase agreements and other secured borrowings and payment of dividends. The change in net cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2014 included net proceeds of $248.9 million from the issuance of our preferred stock and payments for share repurchases of $44.4 million under our share repurchase program. In addition, the change in net cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2014 included Residential's net proceeds from the issuance of common stock, net borrowings under repurchase agreements and payment of dividends. Net cash related to financing activities will generally consist of Residential's incurrence debt, repayment of debt previously incurred, payment of dividends and issuance of common stock.
Off-balance sheet arrangements
Residential and we have no off-balance sheet arrangements as of March 31, 2015.
Recent accounting pronouncements
See Item 1 - Financial statements (unaudited) - Note 1, “Organization and basis of presentation - Recently issued accounting standards.”
42
Critical accounting judgments
Accounting standards require information in financial statements about the risks and uncertainties inherent in significant estimates, and the application of generally accepted accounting principles involves the exercise of varying degrees of judgment. Certain amounts included in or affecting our financial statements and related disclosures must be estimated requiring us to make certain assumptions with respect to values or conditions that cannot be known with certainty at the time our consolidated financial statements are prepared. These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts we report for our assets and liabilities and our revenues and expenses during the reporting period and our disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our consolidated financial statements. Actual results may differ significantly from our estimates and any effects on our business, financial position or results of operations resulting from revisions to these estimates are recorded in the period in which the facts that give rise to the revision become known. For additional details on our critical accounting judgments, please see "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical accounting judgments” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014,
43
Item 3. Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk
Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market sensitive instruments. The primary market risks that Residential is currently exposed to are real estate risk and interest rate risk. A substantial portion of Residential's investments are, and we expect will continue to be, comprised of non-performing loans and single-family rental properties. The primary driver of the value of both these asset classes is the fair value of the underlying real estate.
Real Estate Risk
Residential property values are subject to volatility and may be affected adversely by a number of factors, including, but not limited to: national, regional and local economic conditions (which may be adversely affected by industry slowdowns and other factors); local real estate conditions (such as an oversupply of housing); construction quality, age and design; demographic factors; and retroactive changes to building or similar codes. Decreases in property values could cause Residential to suffer losses which would result in fewer or no incentive management fees being earned by us.
Interest Rate Risk
Residential will be exposed to interest rate risk from its (a) acquisition and ownership of residential mortgage loans and (b) debt financing activities. Interest rate risk is highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations and other factors beyond Residential's control. Changes in interest rates may affect the fair value of the residential mortgage loans and real estate underlying Residential's portfolios as well as its financing interest rate expense.
We currently do not intend to hedge the risk associated with the residential mortgage loans and real estate underlying Residential's portfolios. However, although we have not yet done so, we may undertake risk mitigation activities with respect to Residential's debt financing interest rate obligations. We expect that Residential's debt financing will at times be based on a floating rate of interest calculated on a fixed spread over the relevant index, as determined by the particular financing arrangement. A significantly rising interest rate environment could have an adverse effect on the cost of Residential's financing. To mitigate this risk, we may use derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps and interest rate options in an effort to reduce the variability of earnings caused by changes in the interest rates Residential pays on its debt.
These derivative transactions will be entered into solely for risk management purposes, not for investment purposes. When undertaken, these derivative instruments likely will expose Residential to certain risks such as price and interest rate fluctuations, timing risk, volatility risk, credit risk, counterparty risk and changes in the liquidity of markets. Therefore, although we expect to transact in these derivative instruments purely for risk management, they may not adequately protect Residential from fluctuations in its financing interest rate obligations.
Residential currently borrows funds at variable rates using secured financings. At March 31, 2015, Residential had $0.9 billion of variable rate debt outstanding not protected by interest rate hedge contracts. The estimated aggregate fair market value of this debt was $0.9 billion. If the weighted average interest rate on this variable rate debt had been 100 basis points higher or lower, the annual interest expense would increase or decrease by $9.3 million, respectively.
Item 4. Controls and procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. Based on such evaluation, such officers have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms, and to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
44
Part II
Item 1. Legal proceedings
There have been no material new developments in our legal proceedings since the March 2, 2015 filing of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, except as follows:
The Police Retirement System of Saint Louis v. Erbey, et al. On April 2, 2015, The Police Retirement System of Saint Louis and the defendants entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) reflecting an agreement in principle to settle the action with the settlement consideration being the new AMA. The MOU contemplates the negotiation and execution of a stipulation of settlement. The stipulation of settlement will be subject to customary conditions, including court approval. If the settlement is finally approved by the court, it will resolve and release all claims in the action that were, or could have been brought by or on behalf of Residential challenging any aspect of the Original AMA and the negotiation of, the terms and provisions of, or the approval of the new AMA. In addition, in connection with the settlement, the parties agreed that plaintiff’s counsel will apply to the court for an award of fees and expenses. There can be no assurances that the parties will ultimately enter into a stipulation of settlement or that the court will approve the settlement.
City of Cambridge Retirement System v. Altisource Asset Management Corp., et al. On March 17, 2015, four plaintiffs filed motions to be appointed as Lead Plaintiff, and these motions are currently before the Court. AAMC’s time to answer or otherwise plead has been extended until after a Lead Plaintiff is appointed.
Kanga v. Altisource Asset Management Corporation, et al. On March 12, 2015, a shareholder derivative action was filed in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, Division of St. Croix by a purported shareholder of AAMC under the caption Nanzeen Kanga v. William Erbey et al., SX-15-CV-105. The action names as defendants William C. Erbey and each of the current and former members of AAMC's Board of Directors and alleges that Mr. Erbey and AAMC’s directors breached fiduciary duties in connection with the disclosures that are the subject of the City of Cambridge Retirement System case described above and certain other matters involving the relationship of Residential and AAMC. At this time, we are not able to predict the ultimate outcome of this matter, nor can we estimate the range of possible loss, if any.
Item 1A. Risk factors
There have been no material changes in our risk factors since December 31, 2014. For information regarding our risk factors, you should carefully consider the risk factors discussed in "Item 1A. Risk factors" in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed on March 2, 2015.
Item 2. Unregistered sales of equity securities and use of proceeds
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The Board of Directors has authorized total repurchases of $300.0 million of common stock. At March 31, 2015, we have remaining approximately $59.4 million authorized by our Board of Directors for share repurchases. Repurchased shares will be held as treasury stock and will be available for general corporate purposes. There were no shares repurchased during the quarter ending March 31, 2015.
Item 4. Mine safety disclosures
Not applicable.
45
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibits
Exhibit Number | Description | ||
2.1 | Separation Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2012, between Altisource Asset Management Corporation and Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 28, 2012). | ||
3.1 | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Altisource Asset Management Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form 10 filed with the Commission on December 5, 2012). | ||
3.2 | First Amended and Restated Bylaws of Altisource Asset Management Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form 10 filed with the Commission on December 5, 2012). | ||
3.3 | Certificate of Designations establishing the Company’s Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 19, 2014). | ||
31.1* | Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act | ||
31.2* | Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act | ||
32.1* | Certification of CEO Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act | ||
32.2* | Certification of CFO Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act | ||
101.INS* | XBRL Instance Document | ||
101.SCH* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document | ||
101.CAL* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | ||
101.DEF* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | ||
101.LAB* | XBRL Extension Labels Linkbase | ||
101.PRE* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
__________
* Filed herewith.
46
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Altisource Asset Management Corporation | ||||
Date: | May 7, 2015 | By: | /s/ | Robin N. Lowe |
Robin N. Lowe | ||||
Chief Financial Officer |
47