AMERICAN AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS INC - Quarter Report: 2009 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
þ
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
|
|
or
|
|
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the transition period from _____________ to _____________
|
|
Commission
File Number: 1-14303
_______________________________________________________________________________
AMERICAN
AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
|
36-3161171
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
One
Dauch Drive, Detroit, Michigan
|
48211-1198
|
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(313)
758-2000
(Registrant's
Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
_______________________________________________________________________________
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes þ No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o
No o*
(*Registrant
is not subject to the requirements of Rule 405 of Regulation S-T at this
time.)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See definition of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated
filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
Large
accelerated filer o Accelerated
filer þ
Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting
company o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of
August 3, 2009, the latest practicable date, the number of shares of the
registrant's Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding was 55,378,663
shares.
Internet
Website Access to Reports
The
website for American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. is www.aam.com. Our annual
reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form
8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13 or
15(d) of the Exchange Act are available free of charge through our website as
soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or
furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Securities
and Exchange Commission also maintains a website at www.sec.gov that
contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information
regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.
FORM
10-Q
FOR
THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2009
Page
Number
|
||||||
1
|
||||||
2
|
||||||
2
|
||||||
2
|
||||||
3
|
||||||
4
|
||||||
5
|
||||||
18
|
||||||
26
|
||||||
26
|
||||||
27
|
||||||
27
|
||||||
28
|
||||||
Item 4 | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
28
|
||||
28
|
||||||
29
|
||||||
30
|
||||||
Ex. 10.61 Amended and Restated AAM 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan | ||||||
In this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we make statements concerning our expectations,
beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, strategies, and future events or
performance. Such statements are “forward-looking” statements within
the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and relate
to trends and events that may affect our future financial position and operating
results. The terms such as “will,” “may,” “could,” “would,” “plan,”
“believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “project,” and similar words of
expressions, as well as statements in future tense, are intended to identify
forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking
statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results,
and will not necessarily be accurate indications of the times at, or by, which
such performance or results will be achieved. Forward-looking
statements are based on information available at the time those statements are
made and/or management’s good faith belief as of that time with respect to
future events and are subject to risks and differ materially from those
expressed in or suggested by the forward-looking
statements. Important factors that could cause such differences
include, but are not limited to:
·
|
when
post-bankruptcy GM (New GM) and post-bankruptcy Chrysler (New Chrysler)
resume production, production levels, production type of vehicles and
whether we are a supplier for those
vehicles;
|
·
|
to
what extent New GM assumes our contracts with “Old” GM and contract
terms;
|
·
|
our
ability to maintain sufficient liquidity in light of the recent extended
production shutdowns by GM and
Chrysler;
|
·
|
the
terms of our contractual relationships with New GM and New Chrysler
post-bankruptcy;
|
·
|
the
ability of GM to comply with the terms of the Secured Term Loan Facility
provided by the U.S. Treasury and any other applicable requirements of the
Troubled Asset Relief Program
(TARP);
|
·
|
the
impact on our business of requirements imposed on, or actions taken by,
any of our customers in response to TARP or similar
programs;
|
·
|
global
economic conditions;
|
·
|
availability
of financing for working capital, capital expenditures, R&D or other
general corporate purposes, including our ability to comply with financial
covenants and commercial
agreements;
|
·
|
our
customers' (other than GM and Chrysler) and suppliers' availability of
financing for working capital, capital expenditures, R&D or other
general corporate purposes;
|
·
|
reduced
purchases of our products by New GM, New Chrysler or other
customers;
|
·
|
reduced
demand for our customers’ products (particularly light trucks and SUVs
produced by GM and Chrysler);
|
·
|
our
ability to achieve cost reductions through ongoing restructuring
actions;
|
·
|
additional
restructuring actions that may
occur;
|
·
|
our
ability to achieve the level of cost reductions required to sustain global
cost competitiveness;
|
·
|
our
ability to maintain satisfactory labor relations and avoid future work
stoppages;
|
·
|
our
suppliers’ ability to maintain satisfactory labor relations and avoid work
stoppages;
|
·
|
our
customers’ and their suppliers’ ability to maintain satisfactory labor
relations and avoid work stoppages;
|
·
|
our
ability to implement improvements in our U.S. labor cost
structure;
|
·
|
supply
shortages or price increases in raw materials, utilities or other
operating supplies;
|
·
|
our
ability or our customers’ and suppliers’ ability to successfully launch
new product programs on a timely
basis;
|
·
|
our
ability to realize the expected revenues from our new and incremental
business backlog;
|
·
|
our
ability to attract new customers and programs for new
products;
|
·
|
our
ability to develop and produce new products that reflect market
demand;
|
·
|
lower-than-anticipated
market acceptance of new or existing
products;
|
·
|
our
ability to respond to changes in technology, increased competition or
pricing pressures;
|
·
|
continued
or increased high prices for or reduced availability of
fuel;
|
·
|
adverse
changes in laws, government regulations or market conditions affecting our
products or our customers’ products (such as the Corporate Average Fuel
Economy regulations);
|
·
|
adverse
changes in the economic conditions or political stability of our principal
markets (particularly North America, Europe, South America and
Asia);
|
·
|
liabilities
arising from warranty claims, product liability and legal proceedings to
which we are or may become a party;
|
·
|
changes
in liabilities arising from pension and other postretirement benefit
obligations;
|
·
|
risks
of noncompliance with environmental regulations or risks of environmental
issues that could result in unforeseen costs at our
facilities;
|
·
|
our
ability to attract and retain key
associates;
|
·
|
other
unanticipated events and conditions that may hinder our ability to
compete.
|
It is not
possible to foresee or identify all such factors and we make no commitment to
update any forward-looking statement or to disclose any facts, events or
circumstances after the date hereof that may affect the accuracy of any
forward-looking statement.
1
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
AMERICAN
AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
Three
months ended
|
Six
months ended
|
|||||||||||||||||
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
|||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009 |
2008
|
|||||||||||||||
(in
millions, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 245.6 | $ | 490.5 | $ | 648.0 | $ | 1,078.1 | ||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
460.7
|
1,018.4 | 836.0 | 1,593.3 | ||||||||||||||
Gross loss |
(215.1
|
) | (527.9 | ) | (188.0 | ) | (515.2 | ) | ||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
45.5
|
|
44.9 | 89.3 | 94.3 | |||||||||||||
Operating loss |
(260.6
|
) | (572.8 | ) | (277.3 | ) | (609.5 | ) | ||||||||||
Interest expense |
(19.7
|
) | (15.1 | ) | (40.1 | ) | (30.4 | ) | ||||||||||
Investment
income
|
1.0 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 4.2 | ||||||||||||||
Other
income (expense), net
|
(2.9 | ) | 1.1 | (3.7 | ) | 1.6 | ||||||||||||
Loss
before income taxes
|
(282.2 | ) | (585.2 | ) | (319.1 | ) | (634.1 | ) | ||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
6.5 | 59.1 | 2.3 | 37.2 | ||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (288.7 | ) | $ | (644.3 | ) | $ | (321.4 | ) | $ | (671.3 | ) | ||||||
Add: Net loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest
|
0.1 | - | 0.1 | - | ||||||||||||||
Net
loss attributable to AAM
|
$ | (288.6 | ) | $ | (644.3 | ) | $ | (321.3 | ) | $ | (671.3 | ) | ||||||
Basic
loss per share
|
$ | (5.20 | ) | $ | (11.89 | ) | $ | (5.79 | ) | $ | (12.45 | ) | ||||||
Diluted
loss per share
|
$ | (5.20 | ) | $ | (11.89 | ) | $ | (5.79 | ) | $ | (12.45 | ) | ||||||
Dividends
declared per share
|
$ | - | $ | 0.15 | $ | - | $ | 0.30 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
AMERICAN
AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
Assets
|
(in
millions)
|
|||||||
Current assets | ||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 272.4 | $ | 198.8 | ||||
Short-term
investments
|
11.1 | 77.1 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
59.6 | 186.9 | ||||||
AAM-GM
Agreement receivable
|
- | 60.0 | ||||||
Inventories,
net
|
103.2 | 111.4 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
47.3 | 61.1 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
493.6 | 695.3 | ||||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
940.3 | 1,064.2 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
147.8 | 147.8 | ||||||
GM
postretirement cost sharing asset
|
221.7 | 221.2 | ||||||
Other
assets and deferred charges
|
117.2 | 119.2 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 1,920.6 | $ | 2,247.7 | ||||
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ Deficit
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities
|
||||||||
Current
portion of long-term debt
|
$ | 1,248.0 | $ | - | ||||
Accounts
payable
|
135.4 | 250.9 | ||||||
Accrued
compensation and benefits
|
117.3 | 127.5 | ||||||
Deferred
revenue
|
66.7 | 66.7 | ||||||
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
45.4 | 72.6 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
1,612.8 | 517.7 | ||||||
Long-term
debt
|
21.5 | 1,139.9 | ||||||
Deferred
revenue
|
155.9 | 178.2 | ||||||
Postretirement
benefits and other long-term liabilities
|
866.4 | 847.4 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
2,656.6 | 2,683.2 | ||||||
Stockholders'
deficit
|
||||||||
Common
stock, par value $0.01 per share
|
0.6 | 0.6 | ||||||
Paid-in
capital
|
433.3 | 426.7 | ||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(969.9 | ) | (648.6 | ) | ||||
Treasury
stock at cost, 5.2 million shares in 2009 and 2008
|
(174.0 | ) | (173.9 | ) | ||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
||||||||
Defined benefit plans
|
(44.7 | ) | (29.3 | ) | ||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
22.4 | 0.2 | ||||||
Unrecognized loss on derivatives
|
(4.6 | ) | (11.4 | ) | ||||
Total
AAM stockholders' deficit
|
(736.9 | ) | (435.7 | ) | ||||
Noncontrolling
interest in subsidiaries
|
0.9 | 0.2 | ||||||
Total
stockholders’ deficit
|
(736.0 | ) | (435.5 | ) | ||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' deficit
|
$ | 1,920.6 | $ | 2,247.7 |
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
3
AMERICAN
AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six
months ended
|
||||||||
June
30,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(in
millions)
|
||||||||
Operating
activities
|
||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (321.3 | ) | $ | (671.3 | ) | ||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided
by (used in) operating activities
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
72.5 | 112.6 | ||||||
Asset
impairments and related indirect inventory obsolescence
|
151.7 | 294.8 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
(1.3 | ) | 29.2 | |||||
Stock-based compensation
|
7.5 | 5.5 | ||||||
Pensions and other postretirement benefits, net of
contributions
|
(18.8 | ) | 38.0 | |||||
Loss (gain) on retirement of equipment
|
0.8 | (1.5 | ) | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
|
||||||||
Accounts receivable
|
128.4 | (5.7 | ) | |||||
AAM-GM Agreement receivable
|
60.0 | - | ||||||
Inventories
|
6.6 | 5.6 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
(121.2 | ) | 95.1 | |||||
Other assets and liabilities
|
8.7 | 21.8 | ||||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(26.4 | ) | (75.9 | ) | ||||
Investing
activities
|
||||||||
Purchases
of property, plant and equipment
|
(79.6 | ) | (66.9 | ) | ||||
Payments
of deposits for acquisition of property and equipment
|
(1.4 | ) | - | |||||
Proceeds
from sale of equipment
|
0.5 | 2.3 | ||||||
Investment
in joint venture
|
(10.2 | ) | - | |||||
Redemption
of short-term investments
|
66.0 | - | ||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(24.7 | ) | (64.6 | ) | ||||
Financing
activities
|
||||||||
Net
borrowings under revolving credit facilities
|
125.1 | 7.6 | ||||||
Payments
of debt and capital lease obligations
|
(4.9 | ) | (6.9 | ) | ||||
Debt
issuance costs
|
(2.7 | ) | - | |||||
Proceeds
from issuance of long-term debt
|
3.4 | 7.2 | ||||||
Repurchase
of treasury stock
|
(0.1 | ) | (0.1 | ) | ||||
Employee
stock option exercises
|
- | 0.7 | ||||||
Tax
benefit on stock option exercises
|
- | 0.2 | ||||||
Dividends
paid
|
- | (16.2 | ) | |||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
120.8 | (7.5 | ) | |||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash
|
3.9 | 0.5 | ||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
73.6 | (147.5 | ) | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
198.8 | 343.6 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 272.4 | $ | 196.1 | ||||
Supplemental
cash flow information
|
||||||||
Interest paid
|
$ | 38.0 | $ | 31.8 | ||||
Income taxes paid, net of refunds
|
$ | 2.8 | $ | 2.1 |
See
accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
4
AMERICAN
AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
JUNE
30, 2009
(Unaudited)
Organization American
Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc. (Holdings) and its subsidiaries
(collectively, we, our, us or AAM) is a Tier I supplier to the automotive
industry. We manufacture, engineer, design and validate driveline and
drivetrain systems and related components and chassis modules for light trucks,
sport utility vehicles (SUVs), passenger cars, crossover vehicles and commercial
vehicles. Driveline and drivetrain systems include components that
transfer power from the transmission and deliver it to the drive
wheels. Our driveline, drivetrain and related products include axles,
chassis modules, driveshafts, power transfer units, transfer cases, chassis and
steering components, driving heads, crankshafts, transmission parts and
metal-formed products. In addition to locations in the United States
(U.S.) (Michigan, New York, Ohio and Indiana), we have offices or facilities in
Brazil, China, England, Germany, India, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, Poland,
Scotland, South Korea and Thailand.
Basis of Presentation We have prepared the
accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance
with the instructions to Form 10-Q under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. These condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited
but include all normal recurring adjustments, which we consider necessary for a
fair presentation of the information set forth herein. Results of
operations for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the
results for the full fiscal year.
The
balance sheet at December 31, 2008 presented herein has been derived from the
audited consolidated financial statements at that date but does not include all
of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for complete consolidated
financial statements.
In order
to prepare the accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements,
we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts and disclosures in our interim condensed consolidated financial
statements. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
For
further information, refer to the audited consolidated financial statements and
notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008.
Effect of New
Accounting Standards On
January 1, 2009, we adopted FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. EITF 03-6-1,
“Determining Whether
Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating
Securities.” This staff position concludes that unvested
share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or
dividend equivalents are participating securities and shall be included in the
computation of EPS pursuant to the two-class method. FSP No. EITF 03-6-1
was effective for us retrospectively on January 1, 2009. In
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error
Corrections,” the change in accounting principle has been retrospectively
applied to all prior periods presented herein.
We have
presented the effects of the adoption of FSP No. EITF 03-6-1 for the inclusion
of unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to
dividends or dividend equivalents in the computation of EPS for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2009 and June 30, 2008.
5
AMERICAN
AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
Earnings
(loss) per share (EPS)
|
As
calculated prior to FSP No. EITF 03-6-1
|
Adjustments
|
As
reported
|
||||||||
for the three months ended June 30, 2009 | (in millions, except per share data) | ||||||||||
Numerator
|
|||||||||||
Net
loss attributable to AAM
|
$ | (288.6 | ) | $ | - | $ | (288.6 | ) | |||
Denominators
|
|||||||||||
Basic
shares outstanding
|
51.7 | 3.8 | 55.5 | ||||||||
Diluted
shares outstanding
|
51.7 | 3.8 | 55.5 | ||||||||
Basic
EPS
|
$ | (5.58 | ) | $ | 0.38 | $ | (5.20 | ) | |||
Diluted
EPS
|
$ | (5.58 | ) | $ | 0.38 | $ | (5.20 | ) | |||
Earnings
(loss) per share (EPS)
|
As
calculated prior to FSP No. EITF 03-6-1
|
Adjustments
|
As
reported
|
||||||||
for the six months ended June 30, 2009 | (in millions, except per share data) | ||||||||||
Numerator
|
|||||||||||
Net
loss attributable to AAM
|
$ | (321.3 | ) | $ | - | $ | (321.3 | ) | |||
Denominators
|
|||||||||||
Basic
shares outstanding
|
51.7 | 3.8 | 55.5 | ||||||||
Diluted
shares outstanding
|
51.7 | 3.8 | 55.5 | ||||||||
Basic
EPS
|
$ | (6.22 | ) | $ | 0.43 | $ | (5.79 | ) | |||
Diluted
EPS
|
$ | (6.22 | ) | $ | 0.43 | $ | (5.79 | ) | |||
Earnings
(loss) per share (EPS)
|
As
originally reported
|
Adjustments
|
As
adjusted and reported
|
||||||||
for the three months ended June 30, 2008 |
(in
millions, except per share data)
|
||||||||||
Numerator
|
|||||||||||
Net
loss attributable to AAM
|
$ | (644.3 | ) | $ | - | $ | (644.3 | ) | |||
Denominators
|
|||||||||||
Basic
shares outstanding
|
51.6 | 2.6 | 54.2 | ||||||||
Diluted
shares outstanding
|
51.6 | 2.6 | 54.2 | ||||||||
Basic
EPS
|
$ | (12.49 | ) | $ | 0.60 | $ | (11.89 | ) | |||
Diluted
EPS
|
$ | (12.49 | ) | $ | 0.60 | $ | (11.89 | ) | |||
Earnings
(loss) per share (EPS)
|
As
originally reported
|
Adjustments
|
As
adjusted and reported
|
||||||||
for the six months ended June 30, 2008 |
(in
millions, except per share data)
|
||||||||||
Numerator
|
|||||||||||
Net
loss attributable to AAM
|
$ | (671.3 | ) | $ | - | $ | (671.3 | ) | |||
Denominators
|
|||||||||||
Basic
shares outstanding
|
51.6 | 2.3 | 53.9 | ||||||||
Diluted
shares outstanding
|
51.6 | 2.3 | 53.9 | ||||||||
Basic
EPS
|
$ | (13.01 | ) | $ | 0.56 | $ | (12.45 | ) | |||
Diluted
EPS
|
$ | (13.01 | ) | $ | 0.56 | $ | (12.45 | ) | |||
6
AMERICAN
AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
In December 2007, the FASB issued
Statement No. 160 (SFAS 160), “Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements — An Amendment of ARB
No. 51.” SFAS 160 establishes new accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. We adopted SFAS 160 on January
1, 2009 and have retrospectively revised the financial statement presentation of
our noncontrolling interests accordingly.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB
Staff Position (FSP) FAS 157-2, which defers the effective date of SFAS 157 for
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in an entity’s financial statements on a
recurring basis. We adopted the provisions of FSP No. FAS 157-2 on January
1, 2009 and it did not have a material impact on our financial
statements.
In May
2008, the FASB ratified FSP No. APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt
Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash Upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash
Settlement),” which requires issuers of convertible debt securities
within its scope to separate these securities into a debt component and an
equity component, resulting in the debt component being recorded at fair value
without consideration given to the conversion feature. FSP No. APB 14-1 was
effective for us on January 1, 2009. The impact of this FSP was not
material.
In
April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value
of Financial Instruments,” which expands the frequency of fair value
disclosures for publicly traded entities about the fair value of certain
financial instruments not recognized at fair value in the statement of financial
position to include interim reporting periods. We adopted FSP No. FAS
107-1 and APB 28-1 in the second quarter of 2009 and we have included the
expanded disclosures accordingly.
In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 165 (SFAS 165), “Subsequent
Events.” SFAS 165 requires the disclosure of the date through
which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date,
that is, whether that date represents the date the financial statements were
issued or were available to be issued. We adopted SFAS 165 in the
second quarter of 2009 and we have included the required disclosure
accordingly.
2.
|
SIGNIFICANT
RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
|
Our
condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going
concern basis of accounting which contemplates the continuity of operations and
the realization of assets, liabilities and commitments in the normal course of
business. We are currently working with key stakeholders on various
commercial agreements and financing arrangements (including amendments to
existing credit agreements) that would result in a comprehensive, long-term
solution outside of bankruptcy. However, there can be no assurance
that we will be successful in reaching agreements with these parties and avoid
filing for bankruptcy protection.
As of
June 30, 2009, we were not in compliance with certain covenants in our Revolving
Credit Facility agreement. Accordingly, on June 30, 2009, we entered
into a waiver and amendment to the Credit Agreement dated as of January 9, 2004,
as amended and restated as of November 7, 2008. The waiver and
amendment, among other things, provides a waiver through July 30, 2009 of
the financial covenants relating to secured indebtedness leverage and interest
coverage as well as a waiver of the collateral coverage requirement of the
Revolving Credit Facility. During the waiver period, we are required
to maintain a daily minimum liquidity of $100 million and will be limited
in our ability to incur, refinance or prepay certain debt, make investments, and
make restricted payments. On July 29, 2009, the waiver was extended
through August 20, 2009, subject to certain terms and conditions described in
Note 16 - Subsequent Event.
If we are
unable to further extend the waiver period or amend these agreements, our
lenders under the Revolving Credit Facility can terminate their lending
commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility and declare the loans
outstanding, along with accrued interest, to become immediately due and
payable. If the lenders under the Revolving Credit Facility declare
the loans thereunder immediately due and payable, this would permit the lenders
under the Term Loan and the lenders under certain foreign credit facilities to
accelerate and call their respective loans. Acceleration of the
Revolving Credit Facility and/or the Term Loan would also be an event of default
under the 7.875% Notes and 5.25% Notes, which would give the holders of 25% of
these Notes or the trustee for these Notes the right to accelerate payment of
principal and accrued interest on these Notes 30 days after the Company receives
written notice from them. Given the uncertainties surrounding our
ability to modify our existing debt agreements with our lenders, and the
consequences of our inability to amend these agreements or obtain an additional
waiver of the covenant violations, we may be unable to continue as a going
concern. Our condensed consolidated financial statements do not
reflect any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of
recorded asset amounts or to the amounts and classification of
liabilities.
In 2008,
and continuing in 2009, the domestic automotive industry experienced a severe
downturn. The collapse of the U.S. housing market, the global
financial crisis, a lack of available consumer credit and financing options,
rising unemployment, exceptionally low consumer confidence and wildly
fluctuating fuel and commodity prices, among other factors, combined to result
in a sudden and major drop in industry production and sales
volumes. These difficult market conditions have exacerbated the
financial pressure on the entire domestic automotive industry, and especially
the domestic OEMs.
On June
1, 2009, GM filed for bankruptcy protection in the U.S. Southern District of New
York. Post-bankruptcy GM (New GM) was purchased out of bankruptcy on
July 10, 2009. Our sales to GM were approximately 76% of our total
net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2009. We have collected
substantially all of our pre-bankruptcy receivables from GM and we do not
anticipate collection issues with any subsequent receivable
balances.
7
AMERICAN
AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
Pursuant
to the 1994 Asset Purchase Agreement between GM and AAM, GM agreed to share
proportionally in the cost of postretirement healthcare for eligible retirees
based on the length of service an associate had with AAM and GM. The
GM postretirement cost sharing asset reflects the portion of the obligation
expected to be received from GM under this cost sharing agreement. We
believe that New GM will honor the obligation to AAM under the postretirement
cost sharing agreement and, accordingly, we have not recorded a loss on the
potential inability to recover this asset in full as of June 30,
2009.
AAM and
New GM continue to negotiate final terms for the assumption by New GM of certain
contracts and definitive contract terms.
On April
30, 2009, Chrysler filed for bankruptcy protection in the U.S. Southern District
of New York. Post-bankruptcy Chrysler (New Chrysler) was purchased out of
bankruptcy on June 10, 2009. Our sales to Chrysler were approximately
9% of our total net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2009. We
have collected substantially all of our pre-bankruptcy receivables from Chrysler
and we do not anticipate collection issues with any subsequent receivable
balances.
In the
second quarter of 2009, GM began their extended summer production shutdown for
many of the facilities we support. Chrysler also temporarily idled
their manufacturing operations for a significant portion of the second quarter
through its exit from bankruptcy. The extended production shutdowns
at GM and Chrysler significantly reduced production volumes, revenues and gross
profit in the second quarter of 2009 and will continue to adversely affect our
production volumes, revenues and gross profit in the third quarter of
2009.
Significant risks and uncertainties
continue to exist regarding general economic conditions, the health of the
global and domestic automotive industry and the viability of our major
customers. We have made adjustments to our business plan, global
manufacturing footprint and cost structure to adapt to lower industry production
volumes, improve our liquidity position and diversify our customer base and
revenue concentrations. We will continue to monitor the significant
risks and uncertainties that exist and will react appropriately.
3.
|
RESTRUCTURING
ACTIONS
|
In the
six months ended June 30, 2009, we incurred restructuring charges related to
one-time termination benefits, asset impairments, indirect inventory
obsolescence, contract related costs and other ongoing restructuring
actions.
A summary
of the restructuring related activity for the six months ended June 30, 2009 is
shown below (in millions):
One-time
|
Indirect
|
Contract
|
Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Termination
|
Asset
|
Inventory
|
Environmental
|
Related
|
Restructuring
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Benefits
|
Impairments
|
Obsolescence
|
Obligations
|
Costs
|
Actions
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrual
as of December 31, 2008
|
$ | 42.1 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 0.4 | $ | 5.3 | $ | - | $ | 47.8 | ||||||||||||||
Charges
|
5.7 | 147.8 | 3.9 | 0.2 | 21.1 | 7.6 | 186.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
utilization
|
(35.0 | ) | - | - | - | (1.6 | ) | (6.5 | ) | (43.1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Non-cash
utilization
|
- | (147.8 | ) | (3.9 | ) | - | - | - | (151.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Accrual
adjustments
|
0.8 | - | - | - | - | - | 0.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Accrual
as of June 30, 2009
|
$ | 13.6 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 0.6 | $ | 24.8 | $ | 1.1 | $ | 40.1 |
One-time
Termination Benefits In 2009, we have
reduced our worldwide salaried workforce by approximately 500
positions. We recorded expense of $5.7 million in the six months
ended June 30, 2009 in connection with the estimated postemployment
benefits provided to certain associates in the U.S. and various
statutory requirements for our foreign locations.
Asset
Impairments
In the second quarter of 2009, we identified the following impairment
indicators:
·
|
new
capacity rationalization actions taken by GM and Chrysler as a result of
their bankruptcy filings and subsequent reorganization plans, including
extended production shutdowns, for many of the programs we currently
support; and
|
·
|
changes
in our operating plans, including the idling and consolidation of a
significant portion of our Detroit Manufacturing Complex, made necessary
by extended production shutdowns, and other program delays and sourcing
decisions taken by our customers in the second quarter of
2009.
|
We
recorded asset impairment charges of $147.8 million in the second quarter of
2009 associated with the permanent idling of certain assets and the writedown of
the carrying value of certain assets that were “held for use” as of June 30,
2009 to their estimated fair value.
Indirect
Inventory Obsolescence As a result of the reduction in the
projected usage of machinery and equipment due to the impairment indicators
discussed above, certain indirect inventory was determined to be
obsolete. We recorded a charge of $3.9 million in the second quarter
of 2009, related to the write down of the net book value of these assets to
their estimated net realizable value at June 30, 2009.
Contract Related
Costs Contract related costs recorded in the second quarter of
2009 of $21.1 million related to the estimated fair value of obligations for
leased assets that were permanently idled in the second quarter of
2009.
Other In
the first six months of 2009, we incurred $7.6 million of charges related to the
redeployment of assets to support capacity utilization initiatives and other
related activities.
We expect to make payments of
approximately $15 million in the second half of 2009, $10 million in 2010 and
2011 and $5 million in 2012 related to this restructuring accrual.
8
AMERICAN
AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
4.
|
BUYDOWN
PROGRAM
|
In the
third quarter of 2008, we recorded expense of $51.9 million for the estimated
amount of total Buydown Program (BDP) payments related to permanently idled
UAW-represented associates throughout the term of the 2008 labor agreements at
our original U.S. locations. This represented management’s best
estimate of the portion of the total BDP payments that would not result in a
future benefit to AAM.
Due to new capacity rationalization
actions taken by GM and Chrysler as a result of their bankruptcy filings and
subsequent reorganization plans and changes in our operating plans in the second
quarter of 2009, we increased the estimated number of UAW-represented associates
at our original U.S. locations that we expect to be permanently idled throughout
the term of the 2008 labor agreements or to voluntarily elect to accelerate
their remaining buydown payments and terminate employment. As a
result of this change in estimate, we recorded expense of $22.5 million in the
second quarter of 2009, which represents the estimated additional BDP payments
that will not result in a future benefit to AAM.
5.
|
INVENTORIES
|
We state
our inventories at the lower of cost or market. The cost of worldwide
inventories is determined using the FIFO method. When we determine
that our gross inventories exceed usage requirements, or if inventories become
obsolete or otherwise not saleable, we record a provision for such loss as a
component of our inventory accounts.
Inventories
consist of the following:
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(in
millions)
|
||||||||
Raw
materials and work-in-progress
|
$ | 114.3 | $ | 116.9 | ||||
Finished
goods
|
23.2 | 22.8 | ||||||
Gross
inventories
|
137.5 | 139.7 | ||||||
Other
inventory valuation reserves
|
(34.3 | ) | (28.3 | ) | ||||
Inventories,
net
|
$ | 103.2 | $ | 111.4 |
6.
|
DEBT
|
Debt
consists of the following:
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(in
millions)
|
||||||||
Revolving
Credit Facility
|
$ | 427.5 | $ | 295.0 | ||||
7.875%
Notes
|
300.0 | 300.0 | ||||||
5.25%
Notes, net of discount
|
249.8 | 249.8 | ||||||
2.00%
Convertible Notes
|
0.4 | 0.4 | ||||||
Term
Loan
|
250.0 | 250.0 | ||||||
Foreign
credit facilities
|
34.0 | 36.9 | ||||||
Capital
lease obligations
|
7.8 | 7.8 | ||||||
Debt
|
1,269.5 | 1,139.9 | ||||||
Less: Current portion of long-term debt
|
1,248.0 | - | ||||||
Long-term
debt
|
$ | 21.5 | $ | 1,139.9 |
The
Revolving Credit Facility provides up to $476.9 million of revolving bank
financing commitments through April 2010 and $369.4 million of such revolving
bank financing commitments through December 2011. The Revolving
Credit Facility bears interest at rates based on LIBOR or an alternate base
rate, plus an applicable margin. At June 30, 2009, we had $0.9
million available under the Revolving Credit Facility. This
availability reflects a reduction of $48.5 million for standby letters of credit
issued against the facility.
As a
result of the uncertainties discussed in Note 2 – Significant Risks and
Uncertainties, we have classified our obligations related to the Revolving
Credit Facility, 7.875% Notes, 5.25% Notes, Term Loan and certain foreign credit
facilities and capital leases as current portion of long-term debt on our
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2009.
We
utilize local currency credit facilities to finance the operations of certain
foreign subsidiaries. At June 30, 2009, $34.1 million was outstanding
under these facilities and an additional $17.1 million was
available.
The
weighted-average interest rate of our debt outstanding at June 30, 2009 was 6.7%
and 7.0% as of December 31, 2008.
9
AMERICAN
AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
7. INVESTMENT
IN JOINT VENTURE
In
the first quarter of 2009, we formed a joint venture with Hefei
Automobile Axle Co, Ltd., a subsidiary of Anhui Jianghuai Automobile Group Co,
Ltd. (JV). Each party owns 50 percent of the JV, and we will
account for the JV using the equity method. We recorded the initial
investment in the JV of $10.2 million at cost, and adjusted the carrying amount
of the investment to recognize our proportionate share of the earnings of the
JV. Our investment is classified as other assets and deferred charges
on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
8. FAIR
VALUE
SFAS 157
defines fair value as “the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid
to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at
the measurement date.” The definition is based on an exit price
rather than an entry price, regardless of whether the entity plans to hold or
sell the asset. SFAS 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy
to prioritize inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
·
|
Level 1: Observable
inputs such as quoted prices in active
markets;
|
·
|
Level 2: Inputs,
other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either
directly or indirectly; and
|
·
|
Level 3: Unobservable
inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the
reporting entity to develop its own
assumptions.
|
Financial
instruments The
estimated fair value of our financial assets and liabilities that are recognized
at fair value on a recurring basis, using available market information and other
observable data, as of June 30, 2009, are as follows (in
millions):
Balance Sheet Classification
|
Fair
Value
|
Input
|
|||
Cash equivalents
|
$ | 150.1 |
Level
2
|
||
Short-term investments
|
11.1 |
Level
2
|
|||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|||||
Currency forward contracts
|
3.1 |
Level
2
|
The carrying value of our cash,
accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximates their
fair values due to the short-term maturities of these
instruments. The carrying value of our borrowings under the foreign
credit facilities approximates their fair value due to the frequent resetting of
the interest rates. We estimated the fair value of the amounts
outstanding on our debt as of June 30, 2009, using available market information
and other observable data, to be as follows (in millions):
Fair
Value
|
Input
|
||||
Revolving
Credit Facility
|
$ | 226.6 |
Level
2
|
||
Term
Loan
|
147.5 |
Level
2
|
|||
7.875%
Notes
|
90.0 |
Level
2
|
|||
5.25%
Notes
|
77.5 |
Level
2
|
Long-lived
assets In the second quarter of 2009, as part of our
impairment analysis, we were required to measure the fair value of certain
long-lived assets. In this analysis we utilized the income approach,
which determines fair value through a discounted cash flow analysis based on the
assumptions a market participant would use in pricing these
assets. Significant inputs used by management when determining the
fair value of long-lived assets for impairment include general economic
conditions, future expected production volumes, product pricing and cost
estimates, working capital and capital investment requirements, discount rates
and estimated liquidation values.
The
following table summarizes impairments of long-lived assets measured at fair
value on a nonrecurring basis subsequent to initial recognition (in
millions):
Fair
Value Measurements using Level 3 Inputs
|
Asset
impairment recorded in six months ended June 30, 2009
|
|||||||
Balance Sheet Classification | ||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
$ | 34.1 | $ | 72.6 | ||||
Other assets and deferred charges | 1.5 | 3.3 |
We were
also required to measure the fair value of obligations for leased assets that
were permanently idled in the second quarter of 2009. Using level 3
inputs, we determined the fair value of these obligations by calculating the
present value of future lease payments, adjusted for the effects of any prepaid
or deferred items recognized under the lease, using a credit adjusted risk-free
rate. We recorded $5.9 million of these obligations as accrued
expenses and other current liabilities and $15.2 million of these obligations as
postretirement benefits and other long-term liabilities on our Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2009.
10
AMERICAN
AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
9.
|
DERIVATIVES
|
In March 2008, the FASB issued
Statement No. 161 (SFAS 161), “Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities - an amendment of FASB Statement No.
133.” This statement requires qualitative disclosures about
objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about
fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and
disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative
agreements. We adopted SFAS 161 prospectively on January 1,
2009.
Our business and financial results are
affected by fluctuations in world financial markets, including interest rates
and currency exchange rates. Our hedging policy has been developed to
manage these risks to an acceptable level based on management’s judgment of the
appropriate trade-off between risk, opportunity and cost. We do not
hold financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
Currency forward
contracts From time to time, we use foreign currency forward
contracts to reduce the effects of fluctuations in exchange rates, primarily
relating to the Mexican Peso. As of June 30, 2009, we have forward
contracts outstanding with a notional amount of $19.2 million that hedge our
exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates for our payroll
expenses.
In the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009, we reclassified $2.2 million and $4.6
million, respectively, of existing net derivative losses into net loss from
accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). We include the gain or
loss on the hedged items attributable to this hedged risk in cost of goods sold
on our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. We expect to
reclassify existing net losses of approximately $3 million from accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) to net loss during the next twelve
months.
Interest rate
hedges We are exposed to variable interest rates on certain
credit facilities. From time to time, we use interest rate hedging to
reduce the effects of fluctuations in market interest rates. As of
June 30, 2009, no interest rate hedges were in place. In 2008, we
terminated our interest rate hedge with a notional amount of $200.0 million that
converted variable rate financing based on 3-month LIBOR into fixed interest
rates. We continue to reclassify losses from this interest rate hedge into
earnings. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, we
reclassified $0.7 million and $1.4 million of existing net derivative losses
into net loss from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss),
respectively. We include the gain or loss on the hedged items
attributable to this hedged risk in interest expense on our Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Operations. We expect to reclassify
existing net losses of approximately $2 million from accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) to net loss during the next twelve
months.
10.
|
EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT PLANS
|
The components of net periodic benefit
cost consist of the following:
Pension
Benefits
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
months ended
|
Six
months ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(in
millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Service
cost
|
$ | 1.4 | $ | 3.9 | $ | 2.7 | $ | 8.1 | ||||||||
Interest
cost
|
8.9 | 9.5 | 17.8 | 18.9 | ||||||||||||
Expected
asset return
|
(7.5 | ) | (10.2 | ) | (15.4 | ) | (20.4 | ) | ||||||||
Amortized
loss
|
0.2 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||
Amortized
prior service cost
|
- | 0.3 | - | 0.8 | ||||||||||||
Curtailment
|
0.2 | 6.0 | (1.8 | ) | 6.0 | |||||||||||
Special
and contractual termination benefits
|
2.1 | 27.1 | 2.5 | 27.1 | ||||||||||||
Net
periodic benefit cost
|
$ | 5.3 | $ | 36.9 | $ | 6.4 | $ | 41.0 |
Other
Postretirement Benefits
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
months ended
|
Six
months ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(in
millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Service
cost
|
$ | 0.7 | $ | 3.5 | $ | 1.4 | $ | 8.0 | ||||||||
Interest
cost
|
4.6 | 6.4 | 9.2 | 13.8 | ||||||||||||
Amortized
loss
|
(0.7 | ) | - | (1.2 | ) | - | ||||||||||
Amortized
prior service credit
|
(1.6 | ) | (1.6 | ) | (3.3 | ) | (2.4 | ) | ||||||||
Settlement
|
- | (9.4 | ) | - | (9.4 | ) | ||||||||||
Curtailment
|
(17.4 | ) | (16.1 | ) | (20.5 | ) | (16.1 | ) | ||||||||
Special
and contractual termination benefits
|
(0.7 | ) | 9.8 | (0.7 | ) | 9.8 | ||||||||||
Net
periodic benefit cost (credit)
|
$ | (15.1 | ) | $ | (7.4 | ) | $ | (15.1 | ) | $ | 3.7 |
11
AMERICAN
AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
We recorded a net gain of $17.2 million and $22.3 million for the curtailment of
certain pension and other postretirement benefits in the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009, respectively. These curtailments relate to
UAW-represented associates who participated in attrition programs in 2008 but
did not terminate employment with AAM until 2009, UAW-represented associates who
terminated employment in 2009 by electing to accelerate their remaining buydown
payments and a reduction in our salaried workforce. We completed
remeasurements of the assets and liabilities of our U.S. pension and OPEB plans
in conjunction with the curtailments. These remeasurements resulted
in an increase in postretirement and other long-term liabilities of $14.2
million, an increase in the GM postretirement cost sharing asset of $5.7 million
and an decrease in our accumulated other comprehensive loss of $8.5 million on
our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. These net adjustments
relate to changes in actuarial assumptions since the January 1, 2009 valuation
of the assets and liabilities of our U.S. pension and OPEB plans.
In addition, we increased
postretirement benefits and other long-term liabilities and recorded expense of
$1.4 million and $1.8 million for special and contractual termination
benefits in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
respectively. This charge primarily relates to the voluntary salary
retirement incentive plan benefits to be paid under our pension plans, net
of an adjustment resulting from the closing agreement we signed with the
International Association of Machinists in the second quarter of
2009.
Our regulatory pension funding
requirements in 2009 is approximately $20 million. We expect our net
cash outlay for other postretirement benefit obligations in 2009 to be
approximately $15 million.
11. PRODUCT
WARRANTIES
We record a liability for estimated warranty obligations at the dates our
products are sold. These estimates are established using sales volumes and
internal and external warranty data where there is no payment history and
historical information about the average cost of warranty claims for customers
with prior claims. We adjust the liability as necessary. The
following table provides a reconciliation of changes in the product warranty
liability as of June 30, 2009 (in millions):
Balance
as of January 1, 2009
|
$
|
2.6
|
||
Accruals
|
0.1
|
|||
Settlements
|
(0.1
|
)
|
||
Adjustment to prior period accruals
|
(0.4
|
)
|
||
Currency
translation adjustments
|
0.2
|
|||
Balance
as of June 30, 2009
|
$
|
2.4
|
12. INCOME
TAXES
Under
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting,”
we are required to adjust our effective tax rate each quarter to consistently
estimate our annual effective tax rate. APB No. 28 requires us to
record the tax impact of certain discrete items, unusual or infrequently
occurring, including changes in judgment about valuation allowances and effects
of changes in tax laws or rates, in the interim period in which they
occur. In addition, jurisdictions with a projected loss for the year
or a year-to-date loss where no tax benefit can be recognized are excluded from
the estimated annual effective tax rate. The impact of such an
exclusion could result in a higher or lower effective tax rate during a
particular quarter, based upon the mix and timing of actual earnings versus
annual projections.
Income
tax expense was $6.5 million in the three months ended June 30, 2009 and $2.3
million in the first six months of 2009 as compared to $59.1 million in the
second quarter of 2008 and $37.2 million in the first six months of
2008. Our effective income tax rate was negative 2.3% in the second
quarter of 2009 and negative 0.7% in the first six months of 2009 as compared
to negative 10.1% in the second quarter of 2008 and negative 5.9% in the
first six months of 2008. Our income tax expense and effective tax
rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 reflects the effect of
recording a valuation allowance against income tax benefits on U.S.
losses. The effective tax rate in the three and six months ended June
30, 2008 includes the unfavorable tax adjustment related to the establishment of
the full valuation allowance of $54.4 million against the net U.S. deferred tax
assets.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax
benefits is as follows (in millions):
Balance at January 1, 2009
|
$ | 45.8 | ||
Increase in prior year tax positions
|
2.4 | |||
Decrease in prior year tax positions
|
(0.1 | ) | ||
Increase in current year tax positions
|
0.1 | |||
Balance
at June 30, 2009
|
$ | 48.2 |
12
AMERICAN
AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
13. STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
In the
second quarter of 2009, we recorded $1.5 million of expense for the accelerated
vesting of restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock options as a
result of our salaried workforce reductions.
On
January 6, 2009, we granted approximately 1.3 million shares of restricted stock
with a grant-date fair value of $2.81. The unearned compensation will
be expensed over the vesting period of three years. We also granted
approximately 0.2 million stock options under our 1999 Stock Incentive
Plan. These options will be expensed over the vesting period, which
is three years.
We
estimated the fair value of our employee stock options on the date of grant
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following
assumptions:
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Expected
volatility
|
64.32 | % | 46.10 | % | ||||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
2.07 | % | 3.78 | % | ||||
Dividend
yield
|
2.85 | % | 6.20 | % | ||||
Expected
life of options
|
8
years
|
8
years
|
||||||
Weighted-average
grant-date fair value
|
$ | 1.40 | $ | 2.67 |
14.
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Comprehensive
loss consists of the following:
Three
months ended
|
Six
months ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(in
millions)
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (288.6 | ) | $ | (644.3 | ) | $ | (321.3 | ) | $ | (671.3 | ) | ||||
Defined
benefit plans, net of tax
|
(25.4 | ) | 73.7 | (15.4 | ) | 81.1 | ||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustments, net
of tax
|
22.0 | 9.9 | 22.4 | 13.4 | ||||||||||||
Change
in derivatives, net of tax
|
4.4 | 2.9 | 6.8 | 1.5 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive
loss
|
$ | (287.6 | ) | $ | (557.8 | ) | $ | (307.5 | ) | $ | (575.3 | ) | ||||
Less:
Comprehensive income attributable to the noncontrolling
interest
|
- | - | (0.2 | ) | - | |||||||||||
Comprehensive
loss attributable to AAM
|
$ | (287.6 | ) | $ | (557.8 | ) | $ | (307.7 | ) | $ | (575.3 | ) |
15.
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE (EPS)
The
following table sets forth the computation of our basic and diluted
EPS:
Three
months ended
|
Six
months ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||
(in
millions, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||
Numerator
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
loss attributable to AAM
|
$ | (288.6 | ) | $ | (644.3 | ) | $ | (321.3 | ) | $ | (671.3 | ) | ||||
Denominator
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
shares outstanding -
|
||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average
shares outstanding
|
55.5 | 54.2 | 55.5 | 53.9 | ||||||||||||
Effect
of dilutive securities
|
||||||||||||||||
Dilutive
stock-based compensation
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
Diluted
shares outstanding -
|
||||||||||||||||
Adjusted
weighted-average shares after assumed conversions
|
55.5 | 54.2 | 55.5 | 53.9 | ||||||||||||
Basic
EPS
|
$ | (5.20 | ) | $ | (11.89 | ) | $ | (5.79 | ) | $ | (12.45 | ) | ||||
Diluted
EPS
|
$ | (5.20 | ) | $ | (11.89 | ) | $ | (5.79 | ) | $ | (12.45 | ) |
Basic
and diluted loss per share are the same as of June 30, 2008 because the effect
of 1.6 million potentially dilutive shares would have been
antidilutive. There were no potentially dilutive shares as of June
30, 2009.
Certain
exercisable stock options were excluded in the computations of diluted EPS
because the exercise price of these options was greater than the average period
market prices. The number of stock options outstanding, which were
not included in the calculation of diluted EPS, was 6.0 million at June 30, 2009
and 4.4 million at June 30, 2008. The ranges of exercise prices
related to the excluded exercisable stock options were $2.81 - $40.83 at June
30, 2009 and $19.54 - $40.83 at June 30, 2008.
13
AMERICAN
AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
16. SUBSEQUENT
EVENT
On
July 29, 2009, we entered into an extension of the waiver and amendment,
dated as of June 29, 2009 (the “Waiver and Amendment”) to the Credit
Agreement dated as of January 9, 2004, as amended and restated as of
November 7, 2008. The waiver extension, among other things,
extends the original waiver period termination date of July 30, 2009 to
August 20, 2009. The waiver extension continues to require us to
maintain a daily minimum liquidity of $100 million and can be terminated
under certain circumstances, including our inability to meet the minimum
liquidity test for four consecutive business days or the payment of interest
during the extension period on our outstanding notes. Except for the
foregoing, the Waiver and Amendment remains in effect.
We have
evaluated and disclosed subsequent events through August 5, 2009, our filing
date, as necessary.
17. SUPPLEMENTAL
GUARANTOR CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Holdings
has no significant assets other than its 100% ownership in AAM, Inc. and no
direct subsidiaries other than AAM, Inc. Holdings fully and
unconditionally guarantees the 5.25% Notes and 7.875% Notes, which are senior
unsecured obligations of AAM, Inc. The 2.00% Convertible Notes are
senior unsecured obligations of Holdings and are fully and unconditionally
guaranteed by AAM, Inc.
The following Condensed Consolidating
Financial Statements are included in lieu of providing separate financial
statements for Holdings and AAM, Inc. These Condensed Consolidating Financial
Statements are prepared under the equity method of accounting whereby the
investments in subsidiaries are recorded at cost and adjusted for the parent’s
share of the subsidiaries’ cumulative results of operations, capital
contributions and distributions, and other equity
changes.
Condensed
Consolidating Statements of Operations
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Three
months ended, June 30,
(in
millions)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Holdings
|
AAM
Inc.
|
All
Others
|
Elims
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||||||
2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
||||||||||||||||||||
External
|
$ | - | $ | 111.5 | $ | 133.9 | $ | - | $ | 245.4 | ||||||||||
Intercompany
|
- | 5.4 | 15.0 | (20.2 | ) | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||
Total
net sales
|
- | 116.9 | 148.9 | (20.2 | ) | 245.6 | ||||||||||||||
Cost
of goods sold
|
- | 269.9 | 211.0 | (20.2 | ) | 460.7 | ||||||||||||||
Gross
loss
|
- | (153.0 | ) | (62.1 | ) | - | (215.1 | ) | ||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
- | 43.5 | 2.0 | - | 45.5 | |||||||||||||||
Operating
loss
|
- | (196.5 | ) | (64.1 | ) | - | (260.6 | ) | ||||||||||||
Non-operating
expense, net
|
- | (20.1 | ) | (1.5 | ) | - | (21.6 | ) | ||||||||||||
Loss
before income taxes
|
- | (216.6 | ) | (65.6 | ) | - | (282.2 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
- | 7.3 | (0.8 | ) | - | 6.5 | ||||||||||||||
Loss
from equity in subsidiaries
|
(288.6 | ) | (69.8 | ) | - | 358.4 | - | |||||||||||||
Net loss
before royalties and dividends
|
(288.6 | ) | (293.7 | ) | (64.8 | ) | 358.4 | (288.7 | ) | |||||||||||
Royalties
and dividends
|
- | 5.1 | (5.1 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||
Net
loss after royalties and dividends
|
(288.6 | ) | (288.6 | ) | (69.9 | ) | 358.4 | (288.7 | ) | |||||||||||
Add:
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
- | - | 0.1 | - | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
Net
loss attributable to AAM
|
$ | (288.6 | ) | $ | (288.6 | ) | $ | (69.8 | ) | $ | 358.4 | $ | (288.6 | ) | ||||||
2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
||||||||||||||||||||
External
|
$ | - | $ | 133.7 | $ | 356.8 | $ | - | $ | 490.5 | ||||||||||
Intercompany
|
- | 10.0 | 15.3 | (25.3 | ) | - | ||||||||||||||
Total
net sales
|
- | 143.7 | 372.1 | (25.3 | ) | 490.5 | ||||||||||||||
Cost
of goods sold
|
- | 708.1 | 335.6 | (25.3 | ) | 1,018.4 | ||||||||||||||
Gross
profit (loss)
|
- | (564.4 | ) | 36.5 | - | (527.9 | ) | |||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
- | 44.2 | 0.7 | - | 44.9 | |||||||||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
- | (608.6 | ) | 35.8 | - | (572.8 | ) | |||||||||||||
Non-operating
income (expense), net
|
- | (12.8 | ) | 0.4 | - | (12.4 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
- | (621.4 | ) | 36.2 | - | (585.2 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
- | 57.2 | 1.9 | - | 59.1 | |||||||||||||||
Earnings
(loss) from equity in subsidiaries
|
(644.3 | ) | 17.8 | - | 626.5 | - | ||||||||||||||
Net
income (loss) before royalties and dividends
|
(644.3 | ) | (660.8 | ) | 34.3 | 626.5 | (644.3 | ) | ||||||||||||
Royalties
and dividends
|
- | 16.5 | (16.5 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||
Net
income (loss) after royalties and dividends
|
(644.3 | ) | (644.3 | ) | 17.8 | 626.5 | (644.3 | ) | ||||||||||||
Less:
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Net
income (loss) attributable to AAM
|
$ | (644.3 | ) | $ | (644.3 | ) | $ | 17.8 | $ | 626.5 | $ | (644.3 | ) |
14
AMERICAN
AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
Condensed
Consolidating Statements of Operations
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Six
months ended, June 30,
(in
millions)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Holdings
|
AAM
Inc.
|
All
Others
|
Elims
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||||||
2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
||||||||||||||||||||
External
|
$ | - | $ | 293.1 | $ | 354.7 | $ | - | $ | 647.8 | ||||||||||
Intercompany
|
- | 13.0 | 43.4 | (56.2 | ) | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||
Total
net sales
|
- | 306.1 | 398.1 | (56.2 | ) | 648.0 | ||||||||||||||
Cost
of goods sold
|
- | 457.7 | 434.5 | (56.2 | ) | 836.0 | ||||||||||||||
Gross
loss
|
- | (151.6 | ) | (36.4 | ) | - | (188.0 | ) | ||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
- | 84.6 | 4.7 | - | 89.3 | |||||||||||||||
Operating
loss
|
- | (236.2 | ) | (41.1 | ) | - | (277.3 | ) | ||||||||||||
Non-operating
expense, net
|
- | (40.8 | ) | (1.0 | ) | - | (41.8 | ) | ||||||||||||
Loss
before income taxes
|
- | (277.0 | ) | (42.1 | ) | - | (319.1 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
- | 1.6 | 0.7 | - | 2.3 | |||||||||||||||
Loss
from equity in subsidiaries
|
(321.3 | ) | (57.4 | ) | - | 378.7 | - | |||||||||||||
Net
loss before royalties and dividends
|
(321.3 | ) | (336.0 | ) | (42.8 | ) | 378.7 | (321.4 | ) | |||||||||||
Royalties
and dividends
|
- | 14.7 | (14.7 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||
Net
loss after royalties and dividends
|
(321.3 | ) | (321.3 | ) | (57.5 | ) | 378.7 | (321.4 | ) | |||||||||||
Add:
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
- | - | 0.1 | - | 0.1 | |||||||||||||||
Net
loss attributable to AAM
|
$ | (321.3 | ) | $ | (321.3 | ) | $ | (57.4 | ) | $ | 378.7 | $ | (321.3 | ) | ||||||
2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
||||||||||||||||||||
External
|
$ | - | $ | 423.3 | $ | 654.8 | $ | - | $ | 1,078.1 | ||||||||||
Intercompany
|
- | 24.0 | 31.3 | (55.3 | ) | - | ||||||||||||||
Total
net sales
|
- | 447.3 | 686.1 | (55.3 | ) | 1,078.1 | ||||||||||||||
Cost
of goods sold
|
- | 1,040.0 | 608.6 | (55.3 | ) | 1,593.3 | ||||||||||||||
Gross
profit (loss)
|
- | (592.7 | ) | 77.5 | - | (515.2 | ) | |||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
- | 93.2 | 1.1 | - | 94.3 | |||||||||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
- | (685.9 | ) | 76.4 | - | (609.5 | ) | |||||||||||||
Non-operating
income (expense), net
|
- | (25.3 | ) | 0.7 | - | (24.6 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
- | (711.2 | ) | 77.1 | - | (634.1 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
- | 32.7 | 4.5 | - | 37.2 | |||||||||||||||
Earnings
(loss) from equity in subsidiaries
|
(671.3 | ) | 43.3 | - | 628.0 | - | ||||||||||||||
Net
income (loss) before royalties and dividends
|
(671.3 | ) | (700.6 | ) | 72.6 | 628.0 | (671.3 | ) | ||||||||||||
Royalties
and dividends
|
- | 29.3 | (29.3 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||
Net
income (loss) after royalties and dividends
|
$ | (671.3 | ) | $ | (671.3 | ) | $ | 43.3 | $ | 628.0 | $ | (671.3 | ) | |||||||
Less:
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
- | - | - | - | - | |||||||||||||||
Net
income (loss) attributable to AAM
|
$ | (671.3 | ) | $ | (671.3 | ) | $ | 43.3 | $ | 628.0 | $ | (671.3 | ) |
15
AMERICAN
AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
Condensed
Consolidating Balance Sheets
(in
millions)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Holdings
|
AAM
Inc.
|
All
Others
|
Elims
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||||||
June
30, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Current
assets
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | - | $ | 36.3 | $ | 236.1 | $ | - | $ | 272.4 | ||||||||||
Short-term investments
|
- | 4.7 | 6.4 | - | 11.1 | |||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net
|
- | 12.4 | 47.2 | - | 59.6 | |||||||||||||||
Inventories, net
|
- | 33.4 | 69.8 | - | 103.2 | |||||||||||||||
Prepaid expense and other current assets
|
- | 11.6 | 35.7 | - | 47.3 | |||||||||||||||
Total
current assets
|
- | 98.4 | 395.2 | - | 493.6 | |||||||||||||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
- | 274.8 | 665.5 | - | 940.3 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill
|
- | - | 147.8 | - | 147.8 | |||||||||||||||
Other
assets and deferred charges
|
- | 271.2 | 67.7 | - | 338.9 | |||||||||||||||
Investment
in subsidiaries
|
- | 645.8 | - | (645.8 | ) | - | ||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | - | $ | 1,290.2 | $ | 1,276.2 | $ | (645.8 | ) | $ | 1,920.6 | |||||||||
Liabilities
and stockholders’ equity (deficit)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Current
liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt
|
$ | 0.4 | $ | 1,227.3 | $ | 20.3 | $ | - | $ | 1,248.0 | ||||||||||
Accounts payable
|
- | 55.1 | 80.3 | - | 135.4 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
- | 186.1 | 43.3 | - | 229.4 | |||||||||||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
0.4 | 1,468.5 | 143.9 | - | 1,612.8 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany
payable (receivable)
|
317.1 | (715.1 | ) | 398.0 | - | - | ||||||||||||||
Long-term
debt
|
- | - | 21.5 | - | 21.5 | |||||||||||||||
Investment
in subsidiaries obligation
|
419.4 | - | - | (419.4 | ) | - | ||||||||||||||
Other
long-term liabilities
|
- | 956.2 | 66.1 | - | 1,022.3 | |||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities
|
736.9 | 1,709.6 | 629.5 | (419.4 | ) | 2,656.6 | ||||||||||||||
Total
AAM stockholders’ equity (deficit)
|
(736.9 | ) | (419.4 | ) | 645.8 | (226.4 | ) | (736.9 | ) | |||||||||||
Noncontrolling
interest in subsidiaries
|
- | - | 0.9 | - | 0.9 | |||||||||||||||
Total
stockholders’ equity (deficit)
|
(736.9 | ) | (419.4 | ) | 646.7 | (226.4 | ) | (736.0 | ) | |||||||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)
|
$ | - | $ | 1,290.2 | $ | 1,276.2 | $ | (645.8 | ) | $ | 1,920.6 | |||||||||
December
31, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Current
assets
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | - | $ | 54.6 | $ | 144.2 | $ | - | $ | 198.8 | ||||||||||
Short-term investments
|
- | 10.6 | 66.5 | - | 77.1 | |||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net
|
- | 81.1 | 105.8 | - | 186.9 | |||||||||||||||
AAM-GM Agreement receivable
|
- | 60.0 | - | - | 60.0 | |||||||||||||||
Inventories, net
|
- | 18.8 | 92.6 | - | 111.4 | |||||||||||||||
Other current assets
|
- | 29.7 | 31.4 | - | 61.1 | |||||||||||||||
Total
current assets
|
- | 254.8 | 440.5 | - | 695.3 | |||||||||||||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
- | 393.8 | 670.4 | - | 1,064.2 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill
|
- | - | 147.8 | - | 147.8 | |||||||||||||||
Other
assets and deferred charges
|
- | 295.7 | 44.7 | - | 340.4 | |||||||||||||||
Investment
in subsidiaries
|
- | 678.4 | - | (678.4 | ) | - | ||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | - | $ | 1,622.7 | $ | 1,303.4 | $ | (678.4 | ) | $ | 2,247.7 | |||||||||
Liabilities
and stockholders’ equity (deficit)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Current
liabilities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable
|
$ | - | $ | 121.7 | $ | 129.2 | $ | - | $ | 250.9 | ||||||||||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
- | 194.7 | 72.1 | - | 266.8 | |||||||||||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
- | 316.4 | 201.3 | - | 517.7 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany
payable (receivable)
|
316.6 | (624.3 | ) | 307.7 | - | - | ||||||||||||||
Long-term
debt
|
0.4 | 1,094.9 | 44.6 | - | 1,139.9 | |||||||||||||||
Investment
in subsidiaries obligation
|
118.7 | - | - | (118.7 | ) | - | ||||||||||||||
Other
long-term liabilities
|
- | 954.4 | 71.2 | - | 1,025.6 | |||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities
|
435.7 | 1,741.4 | 624.8 | (118.7 | ) | 2,683.2 | ||||||||||||||
Total
AAM stockholders’ equity (deficit)
|
(435.7 | ) | (118.7 | ) | 678.4 | (559.7 | ) | (435.7 | ) | |||||||||||
Noncontrolling
interest in subsidiaries
|
- | - | 0.2 | - | 0.2 | |||||||||||||||
Total
stockholders’ equity (deficit)
|
(435.7 | ) | (118.7 | ) | 678.6 | (559.7 | ) | (435.5 | ) | |||||||||||
Total
liabilities and shareholders’ equity (deficit)
|
$ | - | $ | 1,622.7 | $ | 1,303.4 | $ | (678.4 | ) | $ | 2,247.7 |
16
AMERICAN
AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
Condensed
Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Six
months ended June 30,
(in
millions)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Holdings
|
AAM
Inc.
|
All
Others
|
Elims
|
Consolidated
|
||||||||||||||||
2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Operating
activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
$ | - | $ | (60.3 | ) | $ | 33.9 | $ | - | $ | (26.4 | ) | ||||||||
Investing
activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases
of property, plant and equipment
|
- | (32.1 | ) | (47.5 | ) | - | (79.6 | ) | ||||||||||||
Redemption
of short-term investments
|
- | 5.9 | 60.1 | - | 66.0 | |||||||||||||||
Investment
in joint venture
|
- | - | (10.2 | ) | - | (10.2 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other
investing activities
|
- | 0.5 | (1.4 | ) | - | (0.9 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
- | (25.7 | ) | 1.0 | - | (24.7 | ) | |||||||||||||
Financing
activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net
debt activity
|
- | 132.5 | (8.9 | ) | - | 123.6 | ||||||||||||||
Intercompany
activity
|
0.1 | (62.1 | ) | 62.0 | - | - | ||||||||||||||
Debt
issuance costs
|
- | (2.7 | ) | - | - | (2.7 | ) | |||||||||||||
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
(0.1 | ) | - | - | - | (0.1 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
- | 67.7 | 53.1 | - | 120.8 | |||||||||||||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash
|
- | - | 3.9 | - | 3.9 | |||||||||||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
- | (18.3 | ) | 91.9 | - | 73.6 | ||||||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
- | 54.6 | 144.2 | - | 198.8 | |||||||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | - | $ | 36.3 | $ | 236.1 | $ | - | $ | 272.4 | ||||||||||
2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Operating
activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
$ | - | $ | (185.8 | ) | $ | 109.9 | $ | - | $ | (75.9 | ) | ||||||||
Investing
activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases
of property, plant and equipment
|
- | (24.7 | ) | (42.2 | ) | - | (66.9 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds
from sale of equipment
|
- | 1.0 | 1.3 | - | 2.3 | |||||||||||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
- | (23.7 | ) | (40.9 | ) | - | (64.6 | ) | ||||||||||||
Financing
activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net
debt activity
|
- | - | 7.9 | - | 7.9 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany
activity
|
16.3 | 0.8 | (17.1 | ) | - | - | ||||||||||||||
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
(0.1 | ) | - | - | - | (0.1 | ) | |||||||||||||
Employee stock
option exercises,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
including
tax benefit
|
- | 0.9 | - | - | 0.9 | |||||||||||||||
Dividends
paid
|
(16.2 | ) | - | - | - | (16.2 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
- | 1.7 | (9.2 | ) | - | (7.5 | ) | |||||||||||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash
|
- | - | 0.5 | - | 0.5 | |||||||||||||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents
|
- | (207.8 | ) | 60.3 | - | (147.5 | ) | |||||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
- | 223.5 | 120.1 | - | 343.6 | |||||||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | - | $ | 15.7 | $ | 180.4 | $ | - | $ | 196.1 |
17
Item 2. Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This
management’s discussion and analysis (MD&A) should be read in conjunction
with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes
appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report and our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Unless
the context otherwise requires, references to "we," "our," "us" or "AAM" shall
mean collectively (i) American Axle & Manufacturing Holdings, Inc.
(Holdings), a Delaware corporation, and (ii) American Axle & Manufacturing,
Inc. (AAM, Inc.), a Delaware corporation, and its direct and indirect
subsidiaries. Holdings has no subsidiaries other than AAM,
Inc.
COMPANY
OVERVIEW
We are a
Tier I supplier to the automotive industry. We manufacture, engineer,
design and validate driveline and drivetrain systems and related components and
chassis modules for light trucks, sport utility vehicles (SUVs), passenger cars,
crossover vehicles and commercial vehicles. Driveline and drivetrain
systems include components that transfer power from the transmission and deliver
it to the drive wheels. Our driveline, drivetrain and related
products include axles, chassis modules, driveshafts, power transfer units,
transfer cases, chassis and steering components, driving heads, crankshafts,
transmission parts and metal-formed products.
We are
the principal supplier of driveline components to GM for its rear-wheel drive
(RWD) light trucks and SUVs manufactured in North America, supplying
substantially all of GM’s rear axle and front four-wheel drive and all-wheel
drive (4WD/AWD) axle requirements for these vehicle platforms. Sales
to GM were approximately 76% of our total net sales in the first six months of
2009 as compared to 73% for the first six months of 2008 and 74% for the
full-year 2008.
We are
the sole-source supplier to GM for certain axles and other driveline products
for the life of each GM vehicle program covered by a Lifetime Program Contract
(LPC). Substantially all of our sales to GM are made pursuant to the
LPCs. The LPCs have terms equal to the lives of the relevant vehicle
programs or their respective derivatives, which typically run 6 to 10 years, and
require us to remain competitive with respect to technology, design and
quality. We have been successful in competing, and we will continue
to compete, for future GM business upon the expiration of the LPCs.
On June
1, 2009, GM filed for bankruptcy protection in the U.S. Southern District of New
York. Post-bankruptcy GM (New GM) was purchased out of bankruptcy on
July 10, 2009. AAM and New GM continue to negotiate final terms for
the assumption by New GM of certain contracts and definitive contract
terms, including the LPCs.
We are
also the principal supplier of driveline system products for the Chrysler
Group’s heavy-duty Dodge Ram full-size pickup trucks (Dodge Ram program) and its
derivatives. Sales to Chrysler were approximately 9% of our total net
sales in the first six months of 2009 as compared to 12% for the first six
months of 2008 and 10% for the full-year 2008.
On April
30, 2009, Chrysler filed for bankruptcy protection in the U.S. Southern District
of New York. Post-bankruptcy Chrysler (New Chrysler) was purchased
out of bankruptcy on June 10, 2009.
In
addition to GM and Chrysler, we supply driveline systems and other related
components to PACCAR Inc., Ford Motor Company (Ford), Harley-Davidson and other
original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and Tier I supplier companies such as
The Timken Company, Jatco Ltd. and Hino Motors, Ltd. Our net sales to
customers other than GM and Chrysler were 15% of our total net sales in the
first six months of 2009 as compared to 16% in the first six months of 2008 and
16% for the full-year 2008.
In 2008
and continuing in 2009, the domestic automotive industry experienced a severe
downturn. The collapse of the U.S. housing market, the global
financial crisis, a lack of available consumer credit and financing options,
rising unemployment, exceptionally low consumer confidence and wildly
fluctuating fuel and commodity prices, among other factors, combined to result
in a sudden and major drop in industry production and sales
volumes. These difficult market conditions have exacerbated the
financial pressure on the entire domestic automotive industry, and especially
the domestic OEMs.
In the
second quarter of 2009, GM announced the extended summer production shutdown for
many of their facilities we support. In connection with its
bankruptcy filing, Chrysler temporarily idled its manufacturing operations
through its exit from bankruptcy. We estimate that the extended
production shutdowns at GM and Chrysler in the second quarter of 2009 adversely
affected net sales by $203.6 million and gross loss by $65.7
million. We currently estimate that the extended production shutdowns
will reduce our third quarter of 2009 net sales by approximately $100
million and will adversely affect gross profit by approximately $30
million.
18
Significant
risks and uncertainties continue to exist as it relates to general economic
conditions, the health of the global and domestic automotive industry and the
viability of our major customers. We have made significant
adjustments to our business plan, global manufacturing footprint and cost
structure to adapt to lower industry production volumes, improve our liquidity
position and diversify our customer base and revenue
concentrations. In the second quarter of 2009, we took restructuring
actions that resulted in significant special charges, including asset
impairments. These special charges are discussed in “RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS –– THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AS COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2008.” We will continue to monitor the significant risks and
uncertainties that exist and will react appropriately.
As of
June 30, 2009, we were not in compliance with certain covenants in our Revolving
Credit Facility agreement. We have entered into a waiver and
amendment which has been extended through August 20, 2009. See
“LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES – Financing Activities” for more
detail. We are currently working with key stakeholders on various
commercial agreements and financing arrangements (including amendments to
existing credit agreements) that would result in a comprehensive, long-term
solution outside of bankruptcy. However, there can be no assurance
that we will be successful in reaching agreements with these parties and avoid
filing for bankruptcy protection.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS –– THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AS COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 2008
Net Sales Net sales
were $245.6 million in the second quarter of 2009 as compared to $490.5 million
in the second quarter of 2008.
As compared to the second quarter of 2008, our sales in the second quarter of
2009 reflect a decrease of approximately 54% in production volumes for the major
full-size truck and SUV programs we currently support for GM and Chrysler and a
decrease of approximately 75% in products supporting GM’s mid-size light truck
and SUV programs. These decreases reflect the impact of extended
production shutdowns at GM and Chrysler, which is estimated at $203.6
million. The decrease in sales also reflects deteriorating general
economic conditions, the difficult market conditions in the automotive industry
and the cancellation of GM’s mid-size SUV program.
On
February 25, 2008, the International United Automobile, Aerospace and
Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW) called a strike at our original
U.S. locations. Sales in the second quarter of 2008 reflect the
adverse impact of the International UAW strike, which was estimated at $274.9
million.
Our content-per-vehicle (as
measured by the dollar value of our products supporting GM’s North American
light truck platforms and the Dodge Ram program) increased 6.8% to $1,401 in the
second quarter of 2009 as compared to $1,312 in the second quarter of
2008. The increase is due to increased content on the GM full-size
programs and mix shifts favoring full-size trucks and SUV
programs. Our 4WD/AWD penetration rate was 61.1% in the second
quarter of 2009 as compared to 64.8% in the second quarter of
2008. The decrease of the penetration rate in the second quarter of
2009 as compared to the second quarter of 2008 reflects the impact of the
cancellation of GM’s mid-size SUV program.
Gross Loss Gross loss was
$215.1 million in the second quarter of 2009 as compared to $527.9 million in
the second quarter of 2008. Gross margin was negative 87.6% in the
second quarter of 2009 as compared to negative 107.6% in the second quarter of
2008. The changes in gross loss and gross margin in the second
quarter of 2009 as compared to the second quarter of 2008 reflects lower special
charges, structural cost reductions resulting from the 2008 labor agreements
with the International UAW and related capacity reduction
initiatives. The gross loss and gross margin in the second quarter of
2009 also includes the adverse impact of extended production shutdowns at GM and
Chrysler, which is estimated at $65.7 million. In addition, the gross
loss and gross margin in the second quarter of 2008 includes the adverse impact
of the strike, which was estimated at $86.6 million.
Gross
loss for the second quarter includes special charges and non-recurring operating
costs, as shown below (in millions):
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Asset
impairments, indirect inventory obsolescence and idled leased
assets
|
$ | 172.8 | $ | 329.9 | ||||
U.S.
hourly workforce and benefit reductions
|
(9.4 | ) | 137.3 | |||||
Acceleration
of Buydown Program (BDP) expense
|
22.5 | - | ||||||
Signing
bonus
|
- | 19.1 | ||||||
Supplemental
unemployment benefits
|
- | 18.0 | ||||||
U.S.
salaried workforce reductions
|
0.7 | 6.1 | ||||||
Other
|
4.2 | 7.4 | ||||||
Total
special charges and non-recurring operating costs
|
$ | 190.8 | $ | 517.8 |
Asset
Impairments, indirect inventory obsolescence and idled leased
assets In the second quarter of 2009, we identified the
following impairment indicators:
·
|
new
capacity rationalization actions taken by GM and Chrysler as a result of
their bankruptcy filings and subsequent reorganization plans, including
extended production shutdowns, for many of the programs we currently
support; and
|
·
|
changes
in our operating plans, including the idling and consolidation of a
significant portion of our Detroit Manufacturing Complex, made necessary
by extended production shutdowns, and other program delays and sourcing
decisions taken by our customers in the second quarter of
2009.
|
We recorded asset
impairment charges of $147.8 million in the second quarter of 2009 associated
with the permanent idling of certain assets and the writedown of the carrying
value of certain assets that were “held for use” as of June 30, 2009 to their
estimated fair value.
19
As a
result of the reduction in the projected usage of machinery and equipment due to
the impairment indicators discussed above, certain indirect inventory was
determined to be obsolete. We recorded a charge of $3.9 million in
the second quarter of 2009 related to the write down of the net book value of
these assets to their estimated net realizable value at June 30,
2009.
We also
recorded a special charge of $21.1 million for the estimated fair value of
obligations for leased assets that were permanently idled in the second quarter
of 2009.
U.S. hourly
workforce and benefit reductions In the second quarter of
2009, we recorded
a net gain of $14.2 million for the curtailment of certain pension and other
postretirement benefits (OPEB). These curtailments relate to
UAW-represented associates at our original U.S. locations who have elected to
accelerate their remaining BDP payments and terminate employment with AAM in
2009. We also recorded $4.8 million in special charges related
to ongoing attrition programs and related statutory benefits.
Acceleration of
BDP expense We recorded a special charge of $22.5 million in
the second quarter of 2009 for the acceleration of BDP expense. This
acceleration relates to revised estimates of the number of UAW-represented
associates at our original locations that are expected to be permanently idled
throughout the term of the 2008 labor agreements or to voluntarily elect to
accelerate their remaining payments and terminate employment.
U.S. salaried
workforce reductions In the second quarter of 2009, we
recorded net special charges of $0.7 million related to U.S. salaried workforce
reductions. This includes a charge of $3.7 million, primarily related
to special termination benefits for associates who accepted the voluntary
salaried retirement incentive program in the second quarter of 2009, and a gain
of $3.0 million for the curtailment of certain pension and OPEB related to these
salaried workforce reductions.
Other Other
special charges and nonrecurring operating costs were $4.2 million in the second
quarter of 2009. This primarily includes charges related to plant
closure costs, the redeployment of assets to support capacity utilization
initiatives and estimated postemployment benefits to be paid to associates in
our European operations.
Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses (SG&A) SG&A (including research and
development (R&D)) was $45.5 million or 18.5% of net sales in the second
quarter of 2009 as compared to $44.9 million or 9.1% of net sales in the second
quarter of 2008. SG&A includes special charges related to
salaried workforce reductions of $1.0 million and $3.4 million in the second
quarter of 2009 and 2008, respectively. R&D was
$17.0 million in the second quarter of 2009 as compared to $21.9 million in
the second quarter of 2008.
Operating
Loss Operating loss was $260.6 million in the second quarter
of 2009 as compared to $572.8 million in the second quarter of
2008. Operating margin was negative 106.1% in the second quarter of
2009 as compared to negative 116.8% in the second quarter of
2008. The changes in operating loss and operating margin were due to
factors discussed in Gross Loss and SG&A above.
Interest Expense Interest
expense was $19.6 million in the second quarter of 2009 as compared to $15.1
million in the second quarter of 2008. The increase in interest
expense reflects higher average outstanding borrowings in the second quarter of
2009 as compared to the second quarter of 2008.
Investment
Income Investment income was $0.9 million in the second
quarter of 2009 as compared to $1.6 million in the second quarter of
2008. The decrease in investment income is a result of lower average
interest rates earned on cash and cash equivalents in the second quarter of 2009
as compared to the second quarter of 2008.
Other Income (Expense),
net Other income (expense), net, which includes the net effect of
foreign exchange gains and losses, was expense of $2.8 million in the second
quarter of 2009 as compared to income of $1.1 million in the second quarter of
2008.
Income Tax Expense Income tax
expense was $6.5 million in the second quarter of 2009 as compared to $59.1
million in the second quarter of 2008. Our effective income tax rate
was negative 2.3% in the second quarter of 2009 as compared to negative
10.1% in the second quarter of 2008. Our income tax expense and
effective tax rate in the second quarter of 2009 reflects the effect of
recording a valuation allowance against income tax benefits on U.S.
losses. The income tax expense and effective tax rate in the second
quarter of 2008 includes the unfavorable tax adjustment related to the
establishment of the full valuation allowance of $54.4 million against the net
U.S. deferred tax assets.
20
Net Loss Attributable to AAM and
Earnings (Loss) Per Share (EPS) Net loss attributable to AAM
was $288.6 million in the second quarter of 2009 as compared to a loss of $644.3
million in the second quarter of 2008. Diluted EPS was a loss of
$5.20 in the second quarter of 2009 as compared to a loss of $11.89 in the
second quarter of 2008. Net loss attributable to AAM and EPS for the
second quarters of 2009 and 2008 were primarily impacted by the factors
discussed in Net Sales, Gross Loss, Interest Expense and Income Tax Expense
above.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS –– SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AS COMPARED TO SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2008
Net Sales Net sales
were $648.0 million in the first six months of 2009 as compared to $1,078.1
million in the first six months of 2008.
As compared to the first six months of
2008, our sales in the first six months of 2009 reflect a decrease of
approximately 38% in production volumes for the major full-size truck and SUV
programs we currently support for GM and Chrysler and a decrease of
approximately 82% in products supporting GM’s mid-size light truck and SUV
programs. These decreases reflect the impact of extended production
shutdowns at GM and Chrysler which is estimated at $203.6
million. The decrease in sales also reflects deteriorating general
economic conditions, the difficult market conditions in the automotive industry
and the cancellation of GM’s mid-size SUV program. We estimate the
adverse impact of the International UAW strike on net sales in the first six
months of 2008 was $414.0 million.
Our content-per-vehicle (as
measured by the dollar value of our products supporting GM’s North American
light truck platforms and the Dodge Ram program) increased 7.3% to $1,416 in the
first six months of 2009 as compared to $1,320 in the first six months of
2008. The increase is due primarily to mix shifts favoring full-size
trucks and SUV programs. Our 4WD/AWD penetration rate was 61.6% in the
first six months of 2009 as compared to 65.4% in the first six months of
2008. The decrease of the penetration rate in the first six months of
2009 as compared to the first six months of 2008 reflects the impact of the
cancellation of GM’s midsize SUV program.
Gross Loss Gross
loss was $188.0 million in the first six months of 2009 as compared to $515.2
million in the first six months of 2008. Gross margin was negative
29.0% in the first six months of 2009 as compared to negative 47.8% in the
first six months of 2008. The change in gross loss and gross margin
in the first six months of 2009 as compared to the first six months of 2008
reflects lower special charges, structural cost reductions resulting from the
2008 labor agreements with the International UAW and related capacity reduction
initiatives. The gross loss and gross margin in the first six months
of 2009 also includes the adverse impact of extended production shutdowns at GM
and Chrysler, which is estimated at $65.7 million. In
addition, the gross loss and gross margin in the first six months of 2008
includes the impact of the International UAW strike, which is estimated at
$129.4 million.
Gross
loss for the six months ended June 30 includes special charges and non-recurring
operating costs, as shown below (in millions):
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Asset
impairments, indirect inventory obsolescence and idled leased assets
|
$ | 172.8 | $ | 329.9 | ||||
U.S. hourly
workforce and benefit reductions
|
(5.4 | ) | 137.3 | |||||
Acceleration
of BDP expense
|
22.5 | - | ||||||
U.S.
salaried workforce reductions
|
4.2 | 6.1 | ||||||
Signing
bonus
|
- | 19.1 | ||||||
Supplemental
unemployment benefits
|
- | 18.0 | ||||||
Other
|
9.0 | 10.9 | ||||||
Total
special charges and non-recurring operating costs
|
$ | 203.1 | $ | 521.3 |
See
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS –– THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AS COMPARED TO THREE
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2008 for further discussion
on these special charges and other non-recurring operating costs.
Selling, General and Administrative
Expenses (SG&A) SG&A (including research and
development (R&D)) was $89.3 million or 13.8% of net sales in the first
six months of 2009 as compared to $94.3 million or 8.7% of net sales in the
first six months of 2008. The decrease in SG&A in the first six
months of 2009 is a result of structural cost reduction
efforts. SG&A includes special charges of $2.0 million and $3.4
million related to salaried workforce reductions in the first six months of 2009
and 2008, respectively. R&D was $35.7 million in the first six
months of 2009 as compared to $42.1 million in the first six months of
2008.
21
Operating
Loss Operating loss was $277.3 million in the first six months
of 2009 as compared to $609.5 million in the first six months of
2008. Operating margin was negative 42.8% in the first six months of
2009 as compared to negative 56.5% in the first six months of
2008. The changes in operating loss and operating margin were due to
the factors discussed in Gross Loss and SG&A above.
Interest
Expense Interest expense was $40.1 million in the first six
months of 2009 as compared to $30.4 million in the first six months of
2008. The increase in interest expense reflects higher average
outstanding borrowings in the first six months of 2009 as compared to the first
six months of 2008.
Investment
Income Investment income was $2.0 million in the first six
months of 2009 as compared to $4.2 million in the first six months of
2008. The decrease in investment income is a result of lower average
interest rates earned on cash and cash equivalents in the first six months of
2009 as compared to the first six months of 2008.
Other Income (Expense),
net Other income (expense), net, which includes the net effect of
foreign exchange gains and losses, was expense of $3.7 million in the first six
months of 2009 as compared to income of $1.6 million in the first six months of
2008.
Income Tax Expense Income tax expense was
$2.3 million in the first six months of 2009 as compared to $37.2 million in the
first six months of 2008. Our effective income tax rate was negative
0.7% in the first six months of 2009 as compared to negative 5.9% in the first
six months of 2008. Our income tax expense and effective tax rate in
the first six months of 2009 reflects the effect of recording a valuation
allowance against income tax benefits on U.S. losses. The income tax
expense and effective tax rate in the first six months of 2008 includes the
unfavorable tax adjustment related to the establishment of the full valuation
allowance of $54.4 million against the net U.S. deferred tax
assets.
Net Loss Attributable to AAM and Earnings (Loss) Per Share
(EPS) Net loss attributable to AAM was $321.3 million in the
first six months of 2009 as compared to $671.3 million in the first six months
of 2008. Diluted earnings (loss) per share was a loss of $5.79 in the
first six months of 2009 as compared to a loss of $12.45 in the first six months
of 2008. Net loss attributable to AAM and EPS for the first six
months of 2009 and 2008 were primarily impacted by the factors discussed in Net
Sales, Gross Loss, Interest Expense and Income Tax Expense.
22
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our
primary liquidity needs are to fund debt service obligations, working capital
investments and capital expenditures. We also need to fund buydown
payments and ongoing attrition programs included in the 2008 labor agreements
with the International UAW.
Operating
Activities Net cash used in operating activities was $26.4
million in the first six months of 2009 as compared to net cash used in
operating activities of $75.9 million in the first six months of
2008. The decrease in cash used in operating activities primarily
reflects changes in working capital.
We
estimate the adverse impact of the extended production shutdowns on our cash
flow from operating activities to be in the range of $30 million to $35 million
in the second quarter of 2009. As we resume normal production levels,
we expect the adverse impact of the extended production shutdowns on our cash
flow from operating activities to be in the range of $60 million to $65 million
in the third quarter of 2009.
We have
received substantially all of our pre-bankruptcy accounts receivable from GM and
Chrysler. We do not anticipate collection issues with any
post-bankruptcy accounts receivable balances.
See below
for more detail on significant factors related to our cash flow from
operations.
AAM-GM
Agreement In 2008, we entered into an agreement with GM in
connection with the resolution of the strike called by the International UAW
(AAM-GM Agreement). Pursuant to this agreement, GM agreed to provide
us with $175.0 million of cash payments through April 2009 to support the
transition of our UAW represented legacy labor at our original U.S.
locations. We received $115.0 million in the third quarter of 2008
and collected the remaining $60.0 million in the first quarter of
2009.
Cash paid for special charges In the first six months of 2009,
we made cash payments of $51.7 million for special charges compared to $43.5
million in the first six months of 2008. These cash payments
primarily related to hourly and salaried workforce reductions.
We expect
to make payments of approximately $15 million in the second half of 2009, $10
million in 2010 and 2011 and $5 million in 2012 related to our
restructuring accrual of $40.1 million as of June 30, 2009.
Pursuant
to the 2008 labor agreements, UAW-represented associates at our original U.S.
locations who are indefinitely laid off for 30 days have the option to
accelerate their remaining BDP lump-sum payments and terminate their employment
with AAM. We have made $3.7 million of accelerated BDP payments in
the first six months of 2009. We expect BDP payments to be in the
range of $60 million and $75 million in the second half of 2009. This
includes the second lump-sum payment to be made to active associates in August
2009, as well as additional payments to associates who elect to accelerate
their remaining BDP payments and terminate employment. As of the date
of this filing, approximately 750 associates have elected the BDP acceleration
option but were not paid as of June 30, 2009.
Pension and Other Postretirement
Benefits (OPEB) Our regulatory pension
funding requirement in 2009 is approximately $20 million. We expect
our net cash outlay for other postretirement benefit obligations in 2009 to be
approximately $15 million.
As a result of UAW-represented
associates electing to accelerate their remaining BDP payments and terminate
their employment with AAM subsequent to June 30, 2009, we expect to record a net
curtailment gain in the third quarter of 2009. The amount of this
curtailment gain will be dependent on the number of additional associates that
elect their acceleration option as well as the actuarial assumptions that will
be used in the remeasurement of the assets and liabilities of the U.S. hourly
pension and OPEB plans on the measurement date.
Pursuant
to the 1994 Asset Purchase Agreement between GM and AAM, GM agreed to share
proportionally in the cost of postretirement healthcare for eligible retirees
based on the length of service an associate had with AAM and GM. The
GM postretirement cost sharing asset reflects the portion of the obligation
expected to be received from GM under this cost sharing agreement. We
believe that New GM will honor the obligation to AAM under the postretirement
cost sharing agreement and, accordingly, we have not recorded a loss on
the potential inability to recover this asset in full as of June 30,
2009.
23
Investing
Activities Capital expenditures were $79.6 million in the
first six months of 2009 as compared to $66.9 million in the first six months of
2008. We expect our capital spending in 2009 to be in the range of
$140 million to $150 million. These expenditures continue to support
the future launch of new vehicle programs within our new business backlog and
the expansion of our global manufacturing footprint.
In 2008,
certain money-market and other similar funds that we invest in temporarily
suspended redemptions. We received $66.0 million of redemptions in
the first six months of 2009.
In the
first quarter of 2009, we formed a joint venture (JV) with Hefei Automobile Axle
Co, Ltd., (HAAC), a subsidiary of the JAC Group (Anhui Jianghuai Automobile
Group Co, Ltd). We made an investment of $10.2 million related to the
formation of this JV.
Financing
Activities Net cash provided by financing activities was
$120.8 million in the first six months of 2009 as compared to $7.5 million
in the first six months of 2008. Total debt outstanding increased
$129.6 million in the first six months of 2009 to $1,269.5 million as compared
to $1,139.9 million at year-end 2008.
The Revolving Credit Facility
provides up to $476.9 million of revolving bank financing commitments through
April 2010 and $369.4 million of such revolving bank financing commitments
through December 2011. At June 30, 2009, we had $0.9 million
available under the Revolving Credit Facility. This availability
reflects a reduction of $48.5 million for standby letters of credit issued
against the facility. We also utilize foreign credit facilities and
uncommitted lines of credit to finance working capital needs. At June
30, 2009, $34.1 million was outstanding and $17.1 million was available under
such agreements.
As of
June 30, 2009, we were not in compliance with certain covenants in our Revolving
Credit Facility agreement. Accordingly, on June 30, 2009, we entered
into a waiver and amendment to the Credit Agreement dated as of January 9, 2004,
as amended and restated as of November 7, 2008. The waiver and
amendment, among other things, provides a waiver through July 30, 2009 of
the financial covenants relating to secured indebtedness leverage and interest
coverage as well as a waiver of the collateral coverage requirement of the
Revolving Credit Facility. On July 29, 2009, we entered into an
extension of the waiver and amendment to the Credit Agreement, dated as of
January 9, 2004 as amended and restated as of November 7,
2008. During the extended waiver period, we are required to maintain
a daily minimum liquidity of $100 million and will be limited in our
ability to incur, refinance or prepay certain debt, make investments, and make
restricted payments. The extended waiver can be terminated under
certain circumstances, including our inability to meet the minimum liquidity
test for four consecutive business days or the payment of interest during the
extension period on our outstanding notes.
If we are
unable to extend the waiver period or amend these agreements, our lenders under
the Revolving Credit Facility can terminate their lending commitments under the
Revolving Credit Facility and declare the loans outstanding, along with accrued
interest, to become immediately due and payable. If the lenders under
the Revolving Credit Facility declare the loans thereunder immediately due and
payable, this would permit the lenders under the Term Loan and the lenders under
certain foreign credit facilities to accelerate and immediately call their
respective loans. Acceleration of the Revolving Credit Facility would
also be an event of default under the 7.875% Notes and 5.25% Notes, which would
give the holders of these Notes the right to accelerate payment of principal and
accrued interest on these Notes 30 days after the Company receives written
notice from them. Given the uncertainties surrounding our ability to
modify our existing debt agreements with our lenders, and the consequences of
our inability to amend these agreements or obtain an additional waiver of the
covenant violations as of June 30, 2009, we may be unable to continue as a going
concern.
We paid
debt issuance costs of $2.7 million associated with the waiver and amendment of
our Revolving Credit Facility.
As a
result of the uncertainties discussed above, we have classified our obligations
related to the Revolving Credit Facility, 7.875% Notes, 5.25% Notes, Term Loan
and certain foreign credit facilities and capital leases as current portion of
long-term debt on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30,
2009.
The
weighted-average interest rate of our long-term debt outstanding in the first
six months of 2009 was 6.9% as compared to 7.2% for the year ended December 31,
2008.
CYCLICALITY
AND SEASONALITY
Our
operations are cyclical because they are directly related to worldwide
automotive production, which is itself cyclical and dependent on general
economic conditions and other factors. Our business is also
moderately seasonal as our major OEM customers historically have a two-week
shutdown of operations in July and an approximate one-week shutdown in
December. In addition, our OEM customers have historically incurred
lower production rates in the third quarter as model changes enter
production. Accordingly, our quarterly results may reflect these
trends.
24
LITIGATION
AND ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
We are
involved in various legal proceedings incidental to our
business. Although the outcome of these matters cannot be predicted
with certainty, we do not believe that any of these matters, individually or in
the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows.
We are
subject to various federal, state, local and foreign environmental and
occupational safety and health laws, regulations and ordinances, including those
regulating air emissions, water discharge, waste management and environmental
cleanup. We will continue to closely monitor our environmental conditions to
ensure that we are in compliance with all laws, regulations and
ordinances. We have made, and will continue to make, capital and
other expenditures (including recurring administrative costs) to comply with
environmental requirements. Such expenditures were not significant in
the first six months of 2009, and we do not expect such expenditures to be
significant for the remainder of 2009.
EFFECT
OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In
December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160 (SFAS 160), “Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements — An Amendment of ARB
No. 51.” SFAS 160 establishes new accounting and
reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. We adopted SFAS 160 on January
1, 2009 and have retrospectively revised the financial statement presentation of
our noncontrolling interests accordingly.
In
February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-2, which deferred the effective
date of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except
for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in an entity’s
financial statements on a recurring basis, until January 1, 2009.
We applied SFAS 157 to the remaining nonfinancial assets and
liabilities on January 1, 2009 and it did not have a material impact on our
financial statements.
In
March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161 (SFAS 161), “Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities - an amendment of FASB Statement No.
133.” This statement requires qualitative disclosures about
objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about
fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and
disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative
agreements. We adopted SFAS 161 prospectively on January 1,
2009.
In May
2008, the FASB ratified FSP No. APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt
Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash Upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash
Settlement),” which requires issuers of convertible debt securities
within its scope to separate these securities into a debt component and an
equity component, resulting in the debt component being recorded at fair value
without consideration given to the conversion feature. Issuance costs are also
allocated between the debt and equity components. FSP No. APB
14-1 was effective for us on January 1, 2009. The impact of this FSP
was not material.
In
June 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments
Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating
Securities.” This staff position notes that unvested
share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or
dividend equivalents are participating securities and shall be included in the
computation of EPS pursuant to the two-class method. We adopted FSP
No. EITF 03-6-1 retrospectively on January 1, 2009. Adoption of this
staff position increased basic and diluted shares outstanding by 3.8
million shares for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2.6 million shares
for the three months ended June 30, 2008. Adoption of this staff
position increased basic and diluted shares outstanding by 3.8 million
shares for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2.3 million shares for the six
months ended June 30, 2008.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value
of Financial Instruments,” which expands the frequency of fair value
disclosures for publicly traded entities about the fair value of certain
financial instruments not recognized at fair value in the statement of financial
position to include interim reporting periods. We adopted FSP No. FAS
107-1 and APB 28-1 in the second quarter of 2009 and we have included the
expanded disclosures accordingly.
In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement No. 165 (SFAS 165), “Subsequent
Events.” SFAS 165 requires the disclosure of the date through
which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date,
that is, whether that date represents the date the financial statements were
issued or were available to be issued. We adopted SFAS 165 in the
second quarter of 2009 and we have included the required disclosure
accordingly.
25
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk
MARKET
RISK
Our
business and financial results are affected by fluctuations in world financial
markets, including interest rates and currency exchange rates. Our
hedging policy has been developed to manage these risks to an acceptable level
based on management’s judgment of the appropriate trade-off between risk,
opportunity and cost. We do not hold financial instruments for
trading or speculative purposes.
Currency Exchange
Risk From time to time, we use foreign currency forward
contracts to reduce the effects of fluctuations in exchange rates, primarily
relating to the Mexican Peso. At June 30, 2009, we had currency
forward contracts with a notional amount of $19.2 million
outstanding. The potential decrease in fair value of foreign exchange
contracts, assuming a 10% adverse change in the foreign currency exchange rates,
would be approximately $2 million at June 30, 2009.
Future
business operations and opportunities, including the expansion of our business
outside North America, may further increase the risk that cash flows resulting
from these activities may be adversely affected by changes in currency exchange
rates. If and when appropriate, we intend to manage these risks by
utilizing local currency funding of these expansions and various types of
foreign exchange contracts.
Interest Rate
Risk We are exposed to variable interest rates on certain
credit facilities. From time to time, we use interest rate hedging to
reduce the effects of fluctuations in market interest rates. As of
June 30, 2009, there are no interest rate hedges in place. The
pre-tax earnings and cash flow impact of a one-percentage-point increase in
interest rates (approximately 15% of our weighted-average interest rate at June
30, 2009) on our long-term debt outstanding at June 30, 2009 would be
approximately $7 million on an annualized basis.
Under the
direction of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we
evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over
financial reporting and concluded that (1) our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) were effective as of June 30, 2009,
and (2) no change in internal control over financial reporting occurred during
the quarter ended June 30, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
26
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
Except for the risk factors set forth
below, there have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in Item
1A of Part 1 in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (“Form
10-K”).
We will need to obtain an additional
waiver extension and/or amendment to our Revolving Credit Facility by August 20,
2009, and if an extension and/or amendment or waiver is needed and not obtained,
we could be in violation of the financial covenants therein, which would result
in a default thereunder and could lead to an acceleration of our obligations
under this facility and other indebtedness.
On
July 29, 2009, we entered into a waiver extension which, among other things,
provides a waiver through August 20, 2009 of the financial covenants relating to
secured indebtedness leverage and interest coverage as well as a waiver of the
collateral coverage requirement of the Revolving Credit Facility. If
we are unable to further extend the waiver period or amend these agreements, our
lenders under the Revolving Credit Facility can terminate their lending
commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility and declare the loans
outstanding, along with accrued interest, to become immediately due and
payable. If the lenders under the Revolving Credit Facility declare
the loans thereunder immediately due and payable, this would permit the lenders
under the Term Loan to immediately call their respective
loans. Acceleration of the Revolving Credit Facility and/or the Term
Loan would also be an event of default under the 7.875% Notes and 5.25% Notes,
which would give the holders from 25% of these Notes or the trustee for these
Notes the right to accelerate payment of principal and accrued interest on these
Notes 30 days after the Company receives written notice from them. If
our obligations under our Revolving Credit Facility and other financing
arrangements are accelerated as described above, our assets and cash flow may be
insufficient to fully repay these obligations, and the lenders under our
Revolving Credit Facility could institute foreclosure proceedings against our
assets. In any such event, we may be required to seek protection
under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
Even if we obtain an amendment to our Revolving Credit Facility, it may include
more restrictive terms, higher capital costs and lower levels of
liquidity. In addition, there are no assurances that, if we obtain an
amendment to our Revolving Credit Facility, we will have sufficient liquidity to
fund debt service obligations, working capital investments and capital
expenditures and we may be required to take additional actions, especially if
the general economic and automotive industry conditions do not
improve.
We have not entered into definitive
agreements with post-bankruptcy GM.
On June 1, 2009, GM filed for
bankruptcy protection. Post-bankruptcy GM (New GM) was purchased out
of bankruptcy on July 10, 2009. We continue to negotiate final terms
for the assumption by New GM of certain existing contracts and definitive
contract terms. Failure to enter into such definitive contracts could
have material adverse consequences for our business and results of operations,
including a material adverse effect on our liquidity, and could result in us
seeking protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.
27
In
the second quarter of 2009, we withheld and repurchased shares to pay taxes due
upon the vesting of certain individuals’ restricted stock. The
following table provides information about our equity security purchases during
the quarter ended June 30, 2009:
ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Period
|
Total
Number of Shares (Or Units) Purchased
|
Average
Price Paid per Share (or Unit)
|
Total
Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans
or Programs
|
Maximum
Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be
Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
|
||||||||||||
April
2009
|
8,497 | $ | 1.24 | - | - | |||||||||||
May
2009
|
- | - | - | - | ||||||||||||
June
2009
|
18,618 | $ | 3.21 | - | - | |||||||||||
Total
|
27,115 | $ | 2.59 | - | - |
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of
Security Holders
Our
annual meeting of stockholders was held on April 30, 2009. At the
meeting, the following matters were submitted to a vote of the
stockholders.
Proposal One: The election of
the following directors to hold office:
Number of Votes | ||||||||||||
Term
Ending:
|
For
|
Withheld
|
||||||||||
Directors:
|
||||||||||||
David C. Dauch |
2012
|
39,975,215
|
664,320
|
|||||||||
Salvatore J. Bonnano Sr. |
2010
|
40,047,351
|
592,184
|
|||||||||
Forest J. Farmer |
2012
|
32,170,807
|
8,468,728
|
|||||||||
Richard C. Lappin |
2012
|
36,169,859
|
4,469,676
|
|||||||||
Thomas K. Walker |
2012
|
34,239,357
|
6,400,178
|
Directors
whose term of office continued after the meeting are Richard E. Dauch, William
P. Miller II, Larry K. Switzer, Elizabeth A. Chappell and Dr. Henry T.
Yang.
Proposal Two: The
ratification of appointment of independent registered public accounting
firm:
Number
of Votes
|
||||||||||||
For
|
Against
|
Abstain
|
||||||||||
Deloitte
& Touche LLP
|
39,941,758 | 602,895 | 94,882 |
Item 6. Exhibits
|
Exhibits
required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed in the Exhibit
Index.
|
28
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
AMERICAN
AXLE & MANUFACTURING HOLDINGS, INC.
(Registrant)
|
/s/ Michael K.
Simonte
|
|
Michael
K. Simonte
|
|
Executive
Vice President - Finance & Chief Financial
Officer
|
(also
in the capacity of Chief Accounting Officer)
August
5, 2009
29
Number
|
_____________________Description of
Exhibit_______________________
|
||
*10.61 |
Amended
and Restated AAM 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan
|
||
*31.1 | Certification of Richard E. Dauch, Co-Founder, Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act | ||
*31.2 | Certification of Michael K. Simonte, Executive Vice President – Finance & Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act | ||
*32 |
Certifications
of Richard E. Dauch, Co-Founder, Chairman of the Board & Chief
Executive Officer and Michael K. Simonte, Executive Vice President –
Finance & Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
||
* Filed
herewith
30