AMERICAN BATTERY TECHNOLOGY Co - Quarter Report: 2016 December (Form 10-Q)

Form 10-Q Quarterly Report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

X . QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarter period ended December 31, 2016

. TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

Commission File number: 000-55088

OROPLATA RESOURCES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada

33-1227980

(State or other jurisdiction

of incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

170 S Green Valley Parkway, Suite #300, Henderson, NV 89012

(Address of principal executive offices)

(702) 318-7218

(Registrant's telephone number)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X . No .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of "large accelerated filer", "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer	.	Accelerated filer	.
Non-accelerated filer	.	Smaller reporting company	X .
(Do not check if a small reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes . No X .

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

The number of shares of the Registrant’s common stock, par value $.001 per share, outstanding as of February 16, 2017 was 59,200,000.


		Page Number
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM I.	Financial Statements		3

	Consolidated Balance Sheets as at December 31, 2016 (unaudited) and September 30, 2016		4

	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)		5

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)		6

	Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)		7

ITEM 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		11

ITEM 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		22

ITEM 4.	Controls and Procedures		22

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	Legal Proceedings		24

ITEM 1A.	Risk Factors		24

ITEM 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		24

ITEM 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		24

ITEM 4.	Mine Safety Disclosure		24

ITEM 5.	Other Information		24

ITEM 6.	Exhibits		24

	SIGNATURES.		25

PART I – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

OROPLATA RESOURCES, INC.

Condensed Financial Statements

For the Period Ended December 31, 2016 (unaudited) and September 30, 2016

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited)

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

OROPLATA RESOURCES, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets


	December 31, 2016 $	September 30, 2016 $
	(unaudited)
ASSETS

Current assets

Cash	5,568	90,040
Prepaid expenses	2,000	–

Total assets	7,568	90,040

LIABILITIES

Current liabilities

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	165,846	95,208
Due to related parties	193,146	178,146
Convertible notes payable, net of unamortized discount of $129,967 and $198,321, respectively	101,033	32,679

Total current liabilities	460,025	306,033

Note payable	303,000	303,000

Total liabilities	763,025	609,033

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Common Stock Authorized: 500,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.001 per share Issued and outstanding: 59,136,943 and 57,136,943 common shares, respectively	59,137	57,137
Additional paid-in capital	28,523,770	27,925,770
Deficit	(29,338,364)	(28,501,900)

Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)	(755,457)	(518,993)

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)	7,568	90,040

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements)

OROPLATA RESOURCES, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(unaudited)


	For the three months ended December 31, 2016 $	For the three months ended December 31, 2015 $

Revenues	–	–

Expenses

Exploration costs	600,000	–
General and administrative	160,378	20,758

Net loss before other expenses	(760,378)	(20,758)

Other expense

Interest expense	76,086	–

Net loss	(836,464)	(20,758)
Net loss per share, basic and diluted	(0.01)	(0.00)
Weighted average shares outstanding	57,984,769	40,000,000

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements)

OROPLATA RESOURCES, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)


	For the three months ended December 31, 2016 $	For the three months ended December 31, 2015 $

Operating Activities

Net loss	(836,464)	(20,758)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

Accretion expense	68,354	–
Shares issued for mineral property exploration costs	600,000	–

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Prepaid expenses	(2,000)	1,000
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	70,638	1,785
Due to related parties	15,000	–

Net Cash Used In Operating Activities	(84,472)	(17,973)

Financing Activities

Advances from related parties	–	20,155

Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities	–	20,155

Change in Cash	(84,472)	2,182

Cash – Beginning of Period	90,040	9,946

Cash – End of Period	5,568	12,128

Supplemental Disclosures

Interest paid	–	–
Income tax paid	–	–

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements)

OROPLATA RESOURCES, INC.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the period ended December 31, 2016

(unaudited)

Organization and Nature of Operations

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Oroplata Resources, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Oroplata” or the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, including the instructions to Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted from these statements pursuant to such rules and regulations and, accordingly, they do not include all the information and notes necessary for comprehensive consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2016, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2016.

The Company was incorporated under the laws of the state of Nevada on October 6, 2011 for the purpose of acquiring and developing mineral properties. The Company has a wholly-owned subsidiary called Oroplata Exploraciones E Ingenieria SRL, which was incorporated in the Dominican Republic on January 10, 2012. On July 26, 2016, the Company incorporated Lithortech Resources Inc., a Nevada company, as a wholly-owned subsidiary. The Company currently holds mineral rights in the Dominican Republic and in the Western Nevada Basin of Nye County in the state of Nevada.

Going Concern

These unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies that the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. As at December 31, 2016, the Company has not earned revenue, has a working capital deficit of $452,457, and has an accumulated deficit of $29,338,364. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from its management, and its ability to identify future investment opportunities and obtain the necessary debt or equity financing, and generating profitable operations from the Company’s future operations. If the Company is able to obtain financing, there is no certainty that terms will be favorable to the Company. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These unaudited consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(a)

Basis of Presentation

The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”) and are expressed in U.S. dollars. The Company’s fiscal year end is September 30.

(b)

Principles of Consolidation

These condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and are expressed in U.S. dollars. These condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Oroplata Exploraciones E Ingenieria SRL and Lithortech Resources Inc. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.

OROPLATA RESOURCES, INC.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the period ended December 31, 2016

(unaudited)

Mineral Property

(a)

The Company has acquired the mineral rights to the Mogollon claim located in the Province of San Juan near the villages of Solorin and El Toro in the Dominican Republic for a price of $10,000 which included the cost of a geological report.

(b)

On June 1, 2016, the Company acquired the mineral rights to 500 lithium claims situated in the Railroad Valley in the Western Nevada Basin of Nye County, Nevada in exchange for $100,000 and the issuance of 16,000,000 common shares of the Company to be issued on June 15, 2016. The agreement is subject to a 2% net smelter return from the production or sale of minerals from the claims and may be reduced to 1% on a one-time payment of $1,000,000 at any time prior to commencement of commercial production. Furthermore, the Company is required to incur exploration expenditures of $77,500 prior to July 31, 2016. In July 2016, the agreement was amended to remove the net smelter return and in exchange, the Company issued an additional 636,943 common shares.

The total consideration given for the mineral rights was $27,051,548 which includes the $100,000 payment and the 16,636,943 shares of common stock valued at $26,951,848. The total amount of $27,051,548 was impaired and recorded as an impairment loss for the year ended September 30, 2016.

In November 2016, the Company issued 2,000,000 common shares with a fair value of $600,000 as an amendment to the July 2016 issuance of common shares to remove the net smelter return. In February 2017, the original 636,943 common shares that were issued by the Company was returned to treasury.

Notes Payable

(a)

On July 18, 2016, the Company entered into a loan agreement with a non-related party for proceeds of $121,000. The amount owing is unsecured, bears interest at 10% per annum, and is due on April 18, 2017, and is convertible into common shares of the Company at $0.50 per share. During the year ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded a beneficial conversion feature of $121,000. During the period ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded accretion expense of $40,628 (2015 - $nil). As of December 31, 2016, the carrying value of the note payable is $73,307 (September 30, 2016 - $32,679), the unamortized discount on the note is $47,693 (September 30, 2016 - $88,321), and accrued interest of $6,332 (September 30, 2016 - $3,282) has been recorded in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.

As an incentive for the loan, the Company issued 121,000 cashless warrants to the note holder as a bonus incentive, which has an exercise price of $0.50 per warrant until July 18, 2021. The fair value of the cashless warrants was $229,069, and was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model assuming no expected dividends, volatility of 239%, and risk-free rate of 1%.

(b)

On September 28, 2016, the Company entered into a loan agreement with a non-related party for proceeds up to $550,000. On September 30, 2016, the Company received proceeds of $110,000. The amount owing is unsecured, bears interest at 10% per annum, and is due on September 30, 2017, and is convertible into common shares of the Company at $0.10 per share. During the year ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded a beneficial conversion feature of $110,000. As at December 31, 2016, the carrying value of the note payable is $27,726 (September 30, 2016 - $nil), the unamortized discount on the note is $82,274 (September 30, 2016 - $110,000), and accrued interest of $2,773 (September 30, 2016 - $nil) has been recorded in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.

As an incentive for the loan, the Company issued 121,000 cashless warrants to the note holder as a bonus incentive, which has an exercise price of $0.50 per warrant until September 30, 2021. The fair value of the cashless warrants was $65,990, and was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model assuming no expected dividends, volatility of 233%, and risk-free rate of 1%.

(c)

On June 15, 2016, the Company entered into a loan agreement with a non-related party for proceeds up to $400,000. During the year ended September 30, 2016, the Company received proceeds of $303,000 (2015 - $nil) on the loan. The loan is unsecured, bears interest at 2.5% per annum, and is due on or before June 15, 2018. As at December 31, 2016, accrued interest of $3,198 (September 30, 2016 - $1,289) has been recorded in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.

OROPLATA RESOURCES, INC.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the period ended December 31, 2016

(unaudited)

Related Party Transactions

(a)

As at December 31, 2016, the Company owes $120,146 (September 30, 2016 - $81,650) to the former Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company for advances to the Company to fund day-to-day operations. The amounts owing are unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand.

(b)

As at December 31, 2016, the Company owes $55,500 (September 30, 2016 - $33,000) to the Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company for advances to the Company to fund day-to-day operations and accrued management fees. The amounts owing are unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand. During the period ended December 31, 2016, the Company accrued $30,000 of management fees and paid $7,500 to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

(c)

As at December 31, 2016, the Company owes $17,500 (September 30, 2016 - $25,000) to directors of the Company for accrued management fees. The amounts owing are unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand. During the period ended December 31, 2016, the Company recorded management fees of $nil and repaid $7,500 to the directors of the Company.

Common Shares

The Company’s authorized common stock consists of 500,000,000 shares of common stock, with par value of $0.001.

(a)

On November 8, 2016, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock to Plateau Ventures LLC (“Plateau”), a non-related party, to remove the net smelter return of the Nye County properties. Refer to Note 3.

Cashless Warrants


	Number of cashless warrants	Weighted average exercise price $

Balance, September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2016	242,000	0.50

Additional information regarding cashless warrants as of December 31, 2016, is as follows:


	Outstanding and exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices $	Number of Cashless Warrants	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (years)

0.50	242,000	4.6

OROPLATA RESOURCES, INC.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

For the period ended December 31, 2016

(unaudited)

Commitments

(a)

On July 1, 2016, the Company entered into management agreements as follows:

Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company for a twelve month term with monthly management fees of $10,000 in addition to reasonable out-of-pocket expenses and any pre-approved travel expenses;

Director of the Company for a three month term with monthly management fees of $5,000 in addition to reasonable out-of-pocket expenses and any pre-approved travel expenses; and

Director of the Company for a three month term with monthly management fees of $5,000 in addition to reasonable out-of-pocket expenses and any pre-approved travel expenses.

(b)

On July 1, 2016, the Company entered into consulting agreements as follows:

Consultant for general business, business development, and corporate advice for a period of six months at a rate of $5,000 per month;

Consultant for business development and field technician services for a period of six months at a rate of $3,000 per month;

Consultant for business development and field technician services for a period of six months at a rate of $5,000 per month; and

Consultant for administrative assistance and translation services for a period of six months at a rate of $2,000 per month.

(c)

On August 10, 2016, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with a consultant for general business, business development, and corporate advice for a period of six months at a rate of $10,000 per month.

Subsequent Events

We have evaluated subsequent events through to the date of issuance of the unaudited consolidated financial statements, and did not have any material recognizable subsequent events after December 31, 2016 with the exception of the following:

(a)

Subsequent to December 31, 2016, the Company issued 700,000 shares of common stock for services.

(b)

In February 2017, 636,943 common shares that were previously issued as part of the amendment for the removal of the net smelter return on the Nye County properties was returned to treasury.

(c)

On February 15, 2017, Craig Alford resigned from his officer positions with the Company and was simultaneously appointed Chief Operating Officer of the Company. Mr. Alford will remain on the Board of Directors of the Company.

(d)

On February 15, 2017, Michael Mason was appointed Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. Mason will remain on the Board of Directors of the Company.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements

You should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in the Form 10-Q. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include those discussed below and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.

Background

Oroplata has a limited operating history and has not yet generated or realized any revenues from its activities. It has performed limited exploration work on its former property, Leomary Gold Claim located in the Dominican Republic. To date it has not performed, and does not expect to perform, any exploration work on its mineral claim called the Mogollon located in the Dominican Republic. On June 1, 2016, the Company entered into a Mineral Claim Purchase Agreement to acquire five hundred (500) lithium mineral claims, totaling 10,000 acres, called the Western Nevada Basin, situated in Railroad Valley in Nye County, Nevada (the “WNB Claims”). The Company, in the second half of 2016, engaged experts to evaluate the region and the WNB Claim to target on-site exploration efforts, which is expected to begin in 2017.

We are an Emerging Growth Company as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.

We shall continue to be deemed an emerging growth company until the earliest of:

(A) the last day of the fiscal year of the issuer during which it had total annual gross revenues of $1,000,000,000 (as such amount is indexed for inflation every 5 years by the Commission to reflect the change in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, setting the threshold to the nearest $1,000,000) or more;

(B) the last day of the fiscal year of the issuer following the fifth anniversary of the date of the first sale of common equity securities of the issuer pursuant to an effective registration statement under this title;

(C) the date on which such issuer has, during the previous 3-year period, issued more than $1,000,000,000 in non-convertible debt; or

(D) the date on which such issuer is deemed to be a 'large accelerated filer', as defined in section 240.12b-2 of title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, or any successor thereto.

As an emerging growth company we are exempt from Section 404(b) of Sarbanes Oxley. Section 404(a) requires Issuers to publish information in their annual reports concerning the scope and adequacy of the internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting. This statement shall also assess the effectiveness of such internal controls and procedures.

Section 404(b) requires that the registered accounting firm shall, in the same report, attest to and report on the assessment on the effectiveness of the internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting.

As an emerging growth company we are exempt from Section 14A and B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 which require the shareholder approval of executive compensation and golden parachutes.

We have irrevocably opted out of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards pursuant to Section 107(b) of the Act.

Oroplata's auditors have issued a going concern opinion on the September 30, 2016 financial statements. This means that its auditors believe there is substantial doubt that it can continue as an on-going business for the next twelve months unless it obtains additional capital to pay for its operations. This is because it has not generated any revenues and no revenues are anticipated until it begins removing and selling minerals, if ever. Accordingly, it must raise cash from sources other than the sale of minerals found on the Mogollon concession. That cash must be raised from other sources. Oroplata's only other source for cash at this time is investment by others in Oroplata, advances from its members of its board of directors or institutional financing. Oroplata must raise cash to implement its planned exploration program

The Company reviews and evaluates long-lived assets, such as its former and present mineral claims, for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amounts may not be recoverable. The assets are subject to impairment consideration under ASC 360-10-35-17 if events or circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts might not be recoverable. When the Company determines that an impairment analysis should be done, the analysis will be performed using rules of ASC 930-360-35, Asset Impairment, and 360-10-15-3 through 15-5, Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.

Recent Developments

Appointment of Mr. Michael Mason and Resignation of Mr. Craig Alford

On February 15, 2017, Michael Mason was appointed Chief Executive Officer of the Company. Mr. Mason will remain on the Board of Directors of the Company.

Appointments of Mr. William Hunter

One June 10, 2016, the Board of Directors of the Company appointed William Hunter to the Board and to serve as the Company’s Treasurer and Vice President of Finance.

Appointment of Mr. Gregory Kuzma

One June 10, 2016 the Board of Directors of the Company appointed Gregory Kuzma to the Board and to serve as the Company’s Vice President of Exploration.

Appointment of Mr. Michael Mason

On July 22, 2016 the Board of Directors of the Company appointed Michael Mason to the Board of Directors.

Preceding the above appointments, the following developments occurred:

Appointment of Mr. Craig Alford and Resignation of Mr. Ruben Ricardo Vasquez

On May 31, 2016, Craig Alford acquired control of twenty-five million (25,000,000) shares (the “Purchased Shares”) of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock, representing approximately 62.5% of the Company’s total then-issued and outstanding common stock, from Ruben Ricardo Vasquez in accordance with a stock purchase agreement between Mr. Alford and Mr. Vasquez (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”). Pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, Mr. Alford paid an aggregate purchase price of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) to Mr. Vasquez in exchange for the Purchased Shares.

As a result of the Stock Purchase Agreement, the following changes to the Company's directors and officers have occurred:

As of May 31, 2016, Ruben Ricardo Vasquez resigned from all officer positions with the Company, including but not limited to those of President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary.

On May 31, 2016, Craig Alford was appointed as the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and Secretary.

On June 13, 2016, Mr. Vasquez resigned from his position as the sole director of the Company and Mr. Alford was appointed as the sole director of the Company.

As a result of these transactions, control of the Company passed to Mr. Alford. The Purchased Shares acquired by Mr. Alford constituted 62.5% of the then issued and outstanding common stock of the Company.

Appointments of Mr. William Hunter

One June 10, 2016, the Board of Directors of the Company appointed William Hunter to the Board and to serve as the Company’s Treasurer and Vice President of Finance.

Appointment of Mr. Gregory Kuzma

One June 10, 2016 the Board of Directors of the Company appointed Gregory Kuzma to the Board and to serve as the Company’s Vice President of Exploration.

Appointment of Mr. Michael Mason

On July 22, 2016 the Board of Directors of the Company appointed Michael Mason to the Board of Directors.

Entrance into Mineral Claim Purchase Agreement with Plateau Ventures LLC

On June 1, 2016, the Company entered into Mineral Claim Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Plateau Ventures LLC., a Utah corporation (“PVL”). Pursuant to the Agreement, upon the satisfaction of various closing conditions, PVL will sell to the Company the title to five hundred (500) lithium mineral claims situated in Railroad Valley in the Western Nevada Basin of Nye County, Nevada (the “Claims”).

The terms of the Agreement are as follows:

Purchase Price: As consideration for the sale of the Claims, the Company:

Issue sixteen million (16,000,000) shares of common stock to PVL or its designee(s);

ii.

Pay PVL one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000); and

iii.

Pay PVL a royalty equal to two percent (2%) of the Net Smelter Returns (“NSR”) from the production or sale of Minerals from the Property. The Royalty may be reduced to one percent (1%) of NSR with payment of one million dollars ($1,000,000) to PVL at any time prior to commencement of commercial production.

Expenditures:

The Company paid seventy seven thousand, five hundred dollars ($77,500), or $155 per claim, to the US Bureau of Land Management; and

ii.

Shall pay annual maintenance fees as applicable.

Full entitlement to the Company of the WNB Claims by Quick Claim Deed was secured on January 2, 2017, when all filing requirements were processed and accepted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in Nevada.

In July 2016, the Company amended the terms of the Agreement to remove the royalty payment of the NSR in exchange for the issuance of 636,943 common shares. In November 2016, the terms of the Agreement were again amended to increase the payment to 2,000,000 common shares, which were issued on November 8, 2016. In February 2017, PVL returned the original 636,943 common shares to the Company.

Overview of Oroplata

Oroplata was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on October 6, 2011 for the purpose of acquiring rights to mineral properties with the eventual objective of being a producing mineral company, if and when it ever occurs. On January 10, 2012 Oroplata incorporated a wholly-owned subsidiary under the laws of the Dominican Republic named "Oroplata Exploraciones E Ingenieria, Orexi, SRL" in order to hold the mineral rights to a claim named "Leomary Gold Claim". After performing limited exploration work, in September 2014, the Company lost the rights to the Leomary Gold Claim.

The Company acquired rights to a new mineral claim in the Dominican Republic called Mogollon (the “Mogollon Claim”) whereby the Company paid $10,000 for the rights to the minerals on the Mogollon Claim and for the completion of a geological report thereon. To date the Company has not performed, and does not expect to perform, any exploration on the Mogollon Claim.

On June 1, 2016, the Company entered into a Mineral Claim Purchase Agreement to acquire five hundred (500) lithium mineral claims, totaling 10,000 acres, called the Western Nevada Basin, situated in Railroad Valley in Nye County, Nevada. The Company, in the second half of 2016, engaged experts to evaluate the region and the WNB Claim to target on-site exploration efforts, which is expected to begin in 2017.

Oroplata owns no real estate as such other than the mineral rights to the Mogollon concession located in the Dominican Republic and the Nye County properties located in Nevada, United States.

Western Nevada Basin Property

On June 1, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire the mineral rights to 500 Placer claims situated in the Railroad Valley, Nye County, Nevada in exchange for $100,000 and the issuance of 16,000,000 common shares of the Company. The original agreement was subject to a 2% net smelter return from the production or sale of minerals from the claims which could be reduced to 1% on a one-time payment of $1,000,000 at any time prior to commencement of commercial production. In July 2016, the agreement was amended to remove the net smelter return and in exchange, the Company issued an additional 636,943 common shares.

The Western Nevada Basin (WNB) Property is located in east central Nye County approximately 93 miles northeast of the county seat of Tonopah, NV, the major commercial center for the region; 56 miles southwest of the town of Ely, NV and 120 miles northeast of the village of Silver Peak the only currently operating Lithium producer in the State. The Western Nevada Basin Property covers a total of 10,000 acres. Each of the 500 Placer claims covers approximately 20 acres and was laid out by aliquot parts as required by the Bureau of Land Management.

Lithium is a locatable mineral according to the Code of Federal Regulations. Lithium should be located by lode claims where it occurs in bedrock and by placer claims where it occurs in sediments. A body of legal precedence set during the original development of lithium brines in the area provides that lithium in valley sediments by nature of the unconsolidated host rock are staked by and produced from placer claims.

The WNB project is held by 500, 20 acre placer claims, which are located on public Federal lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management. The placer claims are located on U.S. Surveyed lands and fit to aliquot parts.

In Nevada, the claim staking procedure requires recording documents with both the county Recorder’s Office and then with the state Bureau of Land Management office. Claims must be held by posts at the claims four corners and Notice of Location which describe the claims legal description of location and owner. The claims are required to be recorded at the county courthouse within the proper jurisdiction within 90 days from the staking date.

Placer claims on Federal lands are held to a September 1 to August 31 assessment year when Intent to Hold or Proof of Labor documents need to be filed with the county for the annual assessment work. The pertinent documents are filed with the Nye County Recorder’s Office.

The current annual maintenance fee is $155 per 20 acre (or a portion thereof) placer claim (http://www.blm.gov/ca/st/en/info/iac/miningfacts.html). Payment of those fees allows the claim to stay on the BLM active data base. Non-payment results in the claims moving to ‘closed’ status. Before August 31st each year, a payment of $155 per claims is made to the BLM to hold the claims in good standing for the following assessment year. The total cost for the 500 WNB claims is $77,500.

The claims were transferred to the Company by a transfer method of a ‘Quit Claim Deed’ which transfers official title to the Company. Before Oct 31st each year, it is necessary to make a payment to the county of $10 per claim to file an affidavit of assessment fees paid and notice of intent to hold the claims into the next assessment year. The total cost for the 500 WNB claims will be $5,000.

As public lands, there is right of free access and both surface and mineral rights are held by the Federal government. Public records (Management, Bureau of Land) show no military withdrawals or Areas of Critical Environmental Concern. The Railroad Valley Wildlife Management Area is located to the west of the WNB claim boundary and has no effect on any planned work on the WNB claim area.

There is free access to the Federal land in Railroad Valley and there are no restrictions on casual prospecting. New exploration drilling will trigger a permitting process. There are two major levels of permitting: Notice of Intent (NOI) and Plan of Operations (POO). Historically, if the proposed disturbance was less than 5 acres or 1,000 tons, then the work can proceed under a NOI if there are no complications such as ancient ruins or endangered species. Application for a NOI is relatively simple with requirements like bonding the access route and re-seeding afterwards. A NOI is valid for two years and may be renewed on a two year basis. Maintaining it requires maintaining bonds and seeding disturbed areas when the work is complete. A POO is more complicated with requirements like an archeological survey, environmental assessment, etc. The BLM may respond within 15 days to a NOI application whereas a POO may require several months to years for final acceptance.

Any drilling planned will require a NOI filed with the Tonopah office of the BLM. To the best of the Company’s knowledge, there are no known environmental liabilities to which the property is subject or other significant factors and risks that may affect access, title, or the right or ability to perform work on the property.

Geologic Setting

The claims are located in the Basin and Range physiographic province which stretches from southern Oregon and Idaho to Mexico. It is characterized by extreme elevation changes between mountains and flat intermountain valleys or basins.

Plate tectonics powered by crustal spreading broadly generates two types of forces: compression as plates are moved together and extension as those forces relax. Compression was the dominant geologic force affecting the western United States beginning about 200 million years ago as the Pacific Ocean plate moved eastward under the North American continent. Those forces compressed the overlying pile of sedimentary rocks accumulated over hundreds of millions of years into a thick stack reaching up to elevations of 10 – 14,000 feet, similar to the altiplano of Mexico and South America which formed at the same time from similar forces. That highland plateau stretched west – east from the Sierra Nevada Mountains in California to the Wasatch Range in Utah.

Extension became the dominant force beginning in the Eocene - Oligocene epochs approximately 55 to 25 million years ago. Also, the relative movement of the tectonic plates changed about 30 million years ago with the movement becoming more oblique to the continent. That relaxed the compressional forces and also tended to ‘tear’ the crust apart, creating diagonal extensions.

The resulting compressional and extensional tectonics have created throughout Nevada a classical Basin and Range province consisting of narrow, N- to NE-trending, fault block mountain chains separated by flat, linear valleys. This geological pattern is repeated across the State and has created a number of currently arid, ‘trapped’ or closed basins with respect to drainage that have the potential of containing Lithium Brine deposits.

Geology of Lithium Brines

Lithium brine deposits are accumulations of saline groundwater that are enriched in dissolved lithium. All producing lithium brine deposits share a number of first-order characteristics: (1) arid climate; (2) closed basin containing a salt flat (Playa or Salar); (3) tectonically driven subsidence; (4) associated igneous or geothermal activity; (5) suitable lithium source-rocks; (6) one or more adequate aquifers; and (7) sufficient time to concentrate a brine.

The single most important factor determining if a nonmarine basin can accumulate lithium brine is whether or not the basin is closed.

Lithium enriched brines are formed by complex and multiple processes of evaporation, re-mobilization, and salt and lithium clay dissolution and precipitation. In essence, lithium is liberated by weathering or derived from hydrothermal fluids from a variety of rock sources within a closed basin where Lithium, a lightweight element, cannot escape.

Lithium is highly soluble and, unlike sodium (Na), potassium (K), or calcium (Ca), does not readily produce evaporite minerals when concentrated by evaporation. Instead it ends up in residual brines in the shallow subsurface. Economic brines have Li concentrations in the range of 200 to 4,000 milligrams per liter (mg/l). 1 mg/l = 1 ppm.

Clayton Valley contains the only currently producing Lithium Brine project in Nevada. Production has been on-going since 1967. The production at Clayton Valley is located approximately 120 miles west of the Railroad Valley. Evidence from Clayton Valley suggests that felsic vitric tuffs are a particularly favorable primary source of Lithium, as well, uplifted Neogene lake beds from earlier in the basin’s history, which have been altered to hectorite, may provide a source of Lithium.

Oroplata's Main Product

Oroplata's main product will be the sale of Lithium Carbonate or Lithium Hydroxide that can be extracted from its Western Nevada Basin Project once the claim has been explored. Since the Western Nevada Basin has yet to be fully explored by us, we have yet to find an ore body and therefore cannot sell any ore.

Exploration and Office Facilities

The Company has no plans to construct any processing facilities until an ore body of reasonable worth is found; which might never happen.

Oroplata's office is at 170 S Green Valley Parkway, Suite #300, Henderson, Nevada 89012. At the present time Oroplata does not require its own office space due to having no employees, other than our two officers Mr. Alford and Mr. Mason, but will consider renting office space once our exploration and staff requirements demand it.

Other Mineral Properties

The Company has no other properties other than the Mogollon property located in the Dominican Republic, and the Nye County mineral claims located in Nevada, United States.

Employees

Other than our Board of Directors and our two officers, Mr. Mason and Mr. Alford, who are engaged by the Company as consultants, we do not have any employees. Our officers devote approximately 20 hours a month, collectively, to our operations but will increase the number of hours when an exploration program is undertaken on our mineral properties.

Significant Accounting Policies

Research and Development Expenditures

Oroplata has not expended any money on research and development since its inception.

Patents and Trademarks

Oroplata does not have any patents or trademarks.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015

Oroplata has not realized any revenue from its exploration activities on the Mogollon concession or the Nye County properties and it is extremely doubtful that the mineral property will be able to produce any revenue for many years. Without an ore reserve Oroplata cannot seek substantial investors to further fund the Company so that production can be achieved. Not until commercial production is realized will Oroplata have any chance of recognizing any form of revenue.

Results of Operations

Revenues

During the three month periods ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company has not realized any revenues.

Expenses

Three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

During the three months ended December 31, 2016, the Company incurred operating expenses of $760,378 compared to $20,758 during the three months ended December 31, 2015. The increase in operating expenses is due to $600,000 for the fair value of the issuance of 2,000,000 common shares to Plateau Ventures Inc. as part of the amendment of the acquisition of the Nye County Claims to remove the royalty payments relating to the NSR. Furthermore, the Company incurred $160,378 of general and administrative costs which is comprised of management and consulting fees for due diligence work and service work relating to the Company’s mineral properties and increase day-to-day operating activities.

Net Loss

The Company incurred a net loss of $836,464 or $0.01 loss per share during the three months ended December 31, 2016 compared to a net loss of $20,758 or $nil loss per share during the three months ended December 31, 2015. In addition to operating expenses, the Company also incurred interest and accretion expense of $76,086 relating to interest due on outstanding loans and convertible notes, as well as accretion expense for the discount on the face value of convertible notes to account for the beneficial conversion feature.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At December 31, 2016, the Company had cash of $5,568 and total assets of $7,568 compared to cash and total assets of $90,040 at September 30, 2016. The decrease in cash and total assets was due to the fact that the Company used more cash for operating activities during the period and did not have any new financing proceeds during the three months ended December 31, 2016.

The Company has a working capital deficit of $452,457 at December 31, 2016 compared to a working capital deficit of $215,993 at September 30, 2016. The increase in the working capital deficit was due to the fact that the Company incurred more operating expense and costs than available cash, which increased the overall working capital deficit.

During the three months ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued 2,000,000 common shares to Plateau Ventures Inc. as part of the amendment to remove the NSR payments originally signed in the agreement. Originally, the Company issued 636,943 common shares to Plateau, but the number of shares to settle the NSR payment was increased due to the overall decrease in the Company’s share price. Plateau returned the original 636,943 common shares in February 2017 and those shares were returned to treasury.

Cash Flows

Cash from Operating Activities

During the three months ended December 31, 2016, the Company used cash of $84,472 for operating activities compared to $17,973 during the three months ended December 31, 2015. The increase in the use of cash for operating activities was due to costs incurred with the acquisition of the Nye County claims which included management fees, professional fees, and consulting fees related to the acquisition and operation of the property.

Cash from Investing Activities

During the three months ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company did not have any investing activities.

Cash from Financing Activities

During the three months ended December 31, 2016, the Company had no financing activities compared to the receipt of $20,155 from related parties during the three months ended December 31, 2015. The amounts received from related parties are unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

None.

Trends

From Oroplata's date of inception it has produced no revenue and maybe will not be able to produce revenue. To the knowledge of its management Oroplata is unaware of any trends or past and future events which will have a material effect upon it, its income and business, both in the long and short term. Please refer to Oroplata's assessment of Risk Factors as noted below.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

In presenting Oroplata's financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepting accounting principles, or GAAP, Oroplata is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, costs and expenses and related disclosures.

Some of the estimates and assumptions Oroplata is required to make relate to matters that are inherently uncertain as they pertain to future events. Oroplata bases these estimates and assumptions on historical experience or on various other factors that it believes to be reasonable and appropriate under the circumstances. On an ongoing basis, Oroplata reconsiders and evaluates its estimates and assumptions. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates.

Oroplata believes that the critical accounting policies listed below involve its more significant judgments, assumptions and estimates and, therefore, could have the greatest potential impact on its financial statements. In addition, Oroplata believes that a discussion of these policies is necessary to understand and evaluate the financial statements contained in this filing.

Estimates and Assumptions

Management uses estimates and assumptions in preparing financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Those estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of the assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported revenues and expenses. Actual results could vary from the estimates that were assumed in preparing these financial statements.

Mineral claim acquisition and exploration costs

The cost of acquiring mineral properties or claims is initially capitalized and then tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. Mineral exploration costs are expensed as incurred.

Income Taxes

Oroplata utilizes the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the liability method deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and the tax bases of the assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect, when the differences are expected to be reversed. An allowance against deferred tax assets is recorded, when it is more likely than not, that such tax benefits will not be realized.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Oroplata does not expect the adoption of any recent accounting pronouncements to have a material impact on its financial statements.

Foreign Currency

The Company’s functional and reporting currency is the United States dollar. Foreign currency transactions are primarily undertaken in Canadian dollars. Foreign currency transactions are translated to United States dollars in accordance with ASC 830, Foreign Currency Translation Matters, using the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. Gains and losses arising on translation or settlement of foreign currency denominated transactions or balances are included in the determination of income.

Market Information

Oroplata's stock is presently quoted on the "OTC Markets" under the symbol “ORRP”. With a lack of liquidity in our common stock, trading prices might be volatile with wide fluctuations. This assumes that there will be a secondary market at all.

The SEC has adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in penny stocks. Penny stocks are generally equity securities with a price of less than $5.00, other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the Nasdaq system, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or quotation system. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the SEC, that: (a) contains a description of the nature and level of risk in the market for penny stocks in both public offerings and secondary trading; (b) contains a description of the broker's or dealer's duties to the customer and of the rights and remedies available to the customer with respect to a violation to such duties or other requirements of Securities laws; (c) contains a brief, clear, narrative description of a dealer market, including bid and ask prices for penny stocks and the significance of the spread between the bid and ask price; (d) contains a toll-free telephone number for inquiries on disciplinary actions; (e) defines significant terms in the disclosure document or in the conduct of trading in penny stocks; and (f) contains such other information and is in such form, including language, type, size and format, as the SEC shall require by rule or regulation.

The broker-dealer also must provide, prior to effecting any transaction in a penny stock, the customer with: (a) bid and offer quotations for the penny stock; (b) the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction; (c) the number of shares to which such bid and ask prices apply, or other comparable information relating to the depth and liquidity of the market for such stock; and (d) monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules; the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written acknowledgment of the receipt of a risk disclosure statement, a written agreement to transactions involving penny stocks, and a signed and dated copy of a suitably written statement.

These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the trading activity in the secondary market for our stock if it becomes subject to these penny stock rules. Therefore, if our common stock becomes subject to the penny stock rules, stockholders may have difficulty selling those securities.

Rule 144 Shares

In general, under Rule 144, a person who is not an affiliate of a company and who is not deemed to have been an affiliate of a company at any time during the three months preceding a sale and who has beneficially owned shares of a company’s common stock for at least six months would be entitled to sell them without restriction, subject to the continued availability of current public information about the company (which current public information requirement is eliminated after a one-year holding period). In addition, a person, who is an affiliate and beneficially owned shares of a company’s common stock for at least six months, will be entitled to sell within any three month period a number of shares that does not exceed the greater of:

One percent of the number of shares of the company's common stock then outstanding; or

The average weekly trading volume of the company's common stock during the four calendar weeks preceding the filing of a notice on form 144 with respect to the sale.

However, Rule 144 is not available for securities initially issued by a company that has either no or nominal operations and no or nominal assets (a “shell company”), whether reporting or non-reporting, or a company that was at any time previously a shell company, unless the company:

has ceased to be a shell company;

is subject to the Exchange Act reporting obligations;

has filed all required Exchange Act reports during the preceding twelve months; and

at least one year has elapsed from the time the company filed with the SEC current Form 10 type information reflecting its status as an entity that is not a shell company.

Dividend Policy

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings to support our operations and finance the growth and development of our business. We do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. Any future determination related to dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors

Equity Compensation Plans

There are no securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans or individual compensation arrangements.

Penny Stock Rule

Oroplata's common stock is considered to be a "penny stock" because it meets one or more of the definitions in SEC Rule 3a51-1:

(i)

It has a price less than five dollars per share;

(ii)

It is not traded on a recognized national exchange; and

(iii)

It is issued by a company with net tangible assets of less than $2,000,000, if in business more than three years continuously, or $5,000,000, if the business is less than three years continuously or with average revenues of less than $6,000,000 for the past three years.

A broker-dealer will have to undertake certain administrative functions required when dealing with a penny stock transaction. Disclosure forms detailing the level of risk in acquiring Oroplata's shares will have to be sent to an interested investor, current bid and offer quotations will have to be provided with an indication as to what compensation the broker-dealer and the salesperson will be receiving from this transaction and a monthly statement showing the closing month price of the shares being held by the investor. In addition, the broker-dealer will have to receive from the investor a written agreement consenting to the transaction. This additional administrative work might make the broker-dealer reluctant to participate in the purchase and sale of Oroplata's shares.

From Oroplata's point of view, being subject to the Penny Stock Rule could make it extremely difficult for it to attract new investors for future capital requirements since many financial institutions are restricted under their by-laws from investing in shares under a certain dollar amount. Ordinary investors might not be willing to subscribe to shares in the capital stock of Oroplata due to the uncertainty as to whether the share price will ever be able to be high enough that the Penny Stock Rule is no longer a concern.

In addition, the stock market in general, and the market prices for thinly traded companies in particular, have experienced extreme volatility that often has been unrelated to the operating performance of such companies. These wide fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of our shares regardless of our future performance and that of Oroplata. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a security, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against such company. Such litigation, if instituted, whether successful or not, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management's attention and resources, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Any new investor purchasing shares in our Company might consider whether they will be able to sell their shares at a given price since if no broker-dealer becomes involved with Oroplata and Oroplata is unable to raise future investment capital the price per share may deteriorate to a point that an investor's entire investment could be lost.

Outstanding Stock Options, Purchase Warrants and Convertible Securities

On July 18, 2016, the Company issued to an investor a common stock warrant to purchase, up to 121,000 shares (as subject to adjustment as provided therein) of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share for a term of five (5) years. Oroplata has not issued any stock options to its director and officer. There are no convertible securities as of the date of this Form 10-Q.

Our authorized capital consists of 500,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of which 59,200,000 shares of common stock are presently issued.

The holders of our common stock are entitled to receive dividends as may be declared by our Board of Directors; are entitled to share ratably in all of our assets available for distribution upon winding up of the affairs our Company; and are entitled to one non-cumulative vote per share on all matters on which shareholders may vote at all Meetings of the shareholders.

The shareholders are not entitled to preference as to dividends or interest; preemptive rights to purchase in new issues of shares; preference upon liquidation; or any other special rights or preferences.

There are no restrictions on dividends under any loan or other financing arrangements.

Non-Cumulative Voting.

The holders of our shares of common stock do not have cumulative voting rights, which means that the holders of more than 50% of such outstanding shares, voting for the election of Directors, can elect all of the Directors to be elected, if they so choose. In such event, the holders of the remaining shares will not be able to elect any of our Directors.

Employment Agreements

We have no employment agreements with our executive officer.

Equity Compensation Plans, Stock Options, Bonus Plans

No such plans or options exist. None have been approved or are anticipated. No Compensation Committee exists either.

Pension Benefits

We do not maintain any defined benefit pension plans.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

We do not maintain any nonqualified deferred compensation plans.

Change in Control of Our Company

We do not know of any arrangements which might result in a change in control.

Registered Agent

We are required by Section 78.090 of the Nevada Revised Statutes (the "NRS") to maintain a registered agent in the State of Nevada. Our registered agent for this purpose is American Corporate Enterprises, 123 W Nye Lane, Suite 129, Carson City, NV 89703. All legal process and any demand or notice authorized by law to be served upon us may be served upon our registered agent in the State of Nevada in the manner provided in NRS 14.020(2).

Transfer Agent

We have engaged the services of Action Stock Transfer Corp., Suite 214 – 2469 E. Fort Union Blvd., Salt Lake City, Utah, 84121, to act as transfer and registrar.

Debt Securities and Other Securities

There are no debt securities outstanding or other securities.

Holders of Common Stock

There are 29 shareholders including our officers and directors as of December 31, 2016.

Anti-Takeover Provision

In accordance with the laws of the State of Nevada and the Securities Regulation Act.

Chapter 78 of Nevada Revised Statutes contains a provision governing "acquisition of controlling interest." This law provides generally that any person or entity that acquires 20% or more of the outstanding voting shares of a publicly-held Nevada corporation in the secondary public or private market may be denied voting rights with respect to the acquired shares, unless a majority of the disinterested shareholders of the corporation elects to restore such voting rights in whole or in part. The control share acquisition act provides that a person or entity acquires "control shares" whenever it acquires shares that, but for the operation of the control share acquisition act, would bring its voting power within any of the following three ranges: 20 to 33 1/3%; 33 1/3 to 50%; or more than 50%.

A "control share acquisition" is generally defined as the direct or indirect acquisition of either ownership or voting power associated with issued and outstanding control shares. The shareholders or board of directors of a corporation may elect to exempt the stock of the corporation from the provisions of the control share acquisition act through adoption of a provision to that effect in the articles of incorporation or bylaws of the corporation. Our articles of incorporation and bylaws do not exempt our common stock from the control share acquisition act.

The control share acquisition act is applicable only to shares of "Issuing Corporations" as defined by the Nevada law. An Issuing Corporation is a Nevada corporation, which: has 200 or more shareholders, with at least 100 of such shareholders being both shareholders of record and residents of Nevada; and does business in Nevada directly or through an affiliated corporation.

At this time, we do not have 100 shareholders of record resident of Nevada. Therefore, the provisions of the control share acquisition act do not apply to acquisitions of our shares and will not until such time as these requirements have been met. At such time as they may apply, the provisions of the control share acquisition act may discourage companies or persons interested in acquiring a significant interest in or control of us, regardless of whether such acquisition may be in the interest of our shareholders.

The Nevada "Combination with Interested Shareholders Statute" may also have an effect of delaying or making it more difficult to effect a change in control of us. This statute prevents an "interested shareholder" and a resident domestic Nevada corporation from entering into a "combination," unless certain conditions are met. The statute defines "combination" to include any merger or consolidation with an "interested shareholder," or any sale, lease, exchange, mortgage, pledge, transfer or other disposition, in one transaction or a series of transactions with an "interested shareholder" having: an aggregate market value equal to 5 percent or more of the aggregate market value of the assets of the corporation; an aggregate market value equal to 5 percent or more of the aggregate market value of all outstanding shares of the corporation; or representing 10 percent or more of the earning power or net income of the corporation.

Corporate Governance

Director Independence

Craig Alford, William Hunter, Gregory Kuzma and Michael Mason are not independent within the meaning of Section 5605 of NASDAQ.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b) as of December 31, 2016 (the "Evaluation Date"). Based on that evaluation, our management has concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of the Evaluation Date as a result of the material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting discussed below.

Disclosure controls and procedures are those controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Notwithstanding the assessment that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective and that there were material weaknesses as identified below, we believe that our financial statements contained in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2016 fairly present our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows in all material respects.

The material weakness identified is described below.

Certain entity level controls establishing a "tone at the top" were considered material weaknesses. As of December 31, 2016, the Company did not have a separate audit committee or a policy on fraud. A whistleblower policy is not necessary given the small size of the organization.

Due to the significant number and magnitude of out-of-period adjustments identified during the year- end closing process, management has concluded that the controls over the period-end financial reporting process were not operating effectively. A material weakness in the period-end financial reporting process could result in us not being able to meet our regulatory filing deadlines and, if not remediated, has the potential to cause a material misstatement or to miss a filing deadline in the future. Management override of existing controls is possible given the small size of the organization and lack of personnel.

There is no system in place to review and monitor internal control over financial reporting. The Company maintains an insufficient complement of personnel to carry out ongoing monitoring responsibilities and ensure effective internal control over financial reporting.

As a result of the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting described above, the Company's management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2016, the Company's internal control over financial reporting was not effective based on the criteria in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organization of the Treadway Commission.

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

To the best of our knowledge, we are not currently a party to any legal proceedings that, individually or in the aggregate, are deemed to be material to our financial condition or results of operations.

We are required by Section 78.090 of the Nevada Revised Statutes (the "NRS") to maintain a registered agent in the State of Nevada. Our registered agent for this purpose is American Corporate Enterprises, Inc 123 West Nye Lane, Station 129, Carson City, NV 89706. All legal process and any demand or notice authorized by law to be served upon us may be served upon our registered agent in the State of Nevada in the manner provided in NRS 14.020(2).

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this item.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

Not Applicable

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

(a) (3) Exhibits

The following exhibits are either provided with this Quarterly Report or are incorporated herein by reference:


Exhibit Number		Description of Exhibits
31.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS**		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB**		XRBL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

_______________

* filed herewith

** to be filed by amendment

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	OROPLATA RESOURCES, INC. (Registrant)

Date: February 21, 2017	By:	/s/ Michael Mason
		Michael Mason
		Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer