AMERICAN BIO MEDICA CORP - Quarter Report: 2018 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
☑
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
For
the quarterly period ended March
31, 2018
☐
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
For
the transition period from to
Commission
File Number: 0-28666
AMERICAN BIO MEDICA CORPORATION
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
New
York
|
|
14-1702188
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
122 Smith Road,
Kinderhook, New York, 12106
(Address of
principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
518-758-8158
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days Yes ☑
No ☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically
and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405
of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such files) Yes ☑ No
☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller
reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated
filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act
Large
accelerated filer
|
☐
|
Accelerated
filer
|
☐
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
☐
|
Smaller
reporting company
|
☑
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes ☐ No
☑
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of
common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
29,932,770
Common Shares as of May 14, 2018
American Bio Medica Corporation
Index to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
For the quarter ended March 31, 2018
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
PAGE
|
|
|
Item
1. Condensed Financial
Statements
|
3
|
|
|
Condensed Balance
Sheets as of March 31, 2018 (unaudited) and December 31,
2017
|
3
|
|
|
Condensed Unaudited
Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2018
and March 31, 2017
|
4
|
|
|
Condensed Unaudited
Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2018
and March 31, 2017
|
5
|
|
|
Notes to Condensed
Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
6
|
|
|
Item
2. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
13
|
|
|
Item
3. Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
16
|
|
|
Item
4. Controls and
Procedures
|
16
|
|
|
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
Item
1. Legal
Proceedings
|
17
|
|
|
Item
1A. Risk
Factors
|
17
|
|
|
Item
2. Unregistered Sales
of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
17
|
|
|
Item 3.
Defaults Upon
Senior Securities
|
17
|
|
|
Item
4. Mine Safety
Disclosures
|
17
|
|
|
Item
5. Other
Information
|
17
|
|
|
Item
6. Exhibits
|
17
|
|
|
Signatures
|
18
|
2
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Condensed Financial Statements
American Bio Medica Corporation
Condensed Balance Sheets
|
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
ASSETS
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
Current
assets
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
$92,000
|
$36,000
|
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $51,000 at
March 31, 2018 and $52,000 at December 31, 2017
|
421,000
|
348,000
|
Inventory, net of
allowance of $521,000 at March 31, 2018 and $500,000 at December
31, 2017
|
1,388,000
|
1,473,000
|
Prepaid expenses
and other current assets
|
61,000
|
97,000
|
Total current
assets
|
1,962,000
|
1,954,000
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and
equipment, net
|
774,000
|
792,000
|
Patents,
net
|
113,000
|
109,000
|
Other
assets
|
21,000
|
21,000
|
Deferred finance
costs – line of credit, net
|
7,000
|
15,000
|
Total
assets
|
$2,877,000
|
$2,891,000
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
$430,000
|
$374,000
|
Accrued expenses
and other current liabilities
|
354,000
|
311,000
|
Wages
payable
|
266,000
|
259,000
|
Line of
credit
|
492,000
|
446,000
|
Current portion of
long-term debt
|
237,000
|
87,000
|
Total current
liabilities
|
1,779,000
|
1,477,000
|
|
|
|
Other
liabilities/debt
|
16,000
|
19,000
|
Long-term debt, net
of current portion and deferred finance costs
|
704,000
|
772,000
|
Total
liabilities
|
2,499,000
|
2,268,000
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND
CONTINGENCIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
equity:
|
|
|
Preferred stock;
par value $.01 per share; 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued
and outstanding at March 31, 2018 and December 31,
2017
|
0
|
0
|
Common stock; par
value $.01 per share; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 29,932,770
issued and outstanding at March 31, 2018 and 29,782,770 issued and
outstanding as of December 31, 2017
|
299,000
|
298,000
|
Additional paid-in
capital
|
21,191,000
|
21,170,000
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(21,112,000)
|
(20,845,000)
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
378,000
|
623,000
|
Total liabilities
and stockholders’ equity
|
$2,877,000
|
$2,891,000
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed
financial statements
3
American Bio Medica Corporation
Condensed Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
For The Three Months Ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|
|
|
Net
sales
|
$1,041,000
|
$1,316,000
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods
sold
|
669,000
|
751,000
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit
|
372,000
|
565,000
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
Research and
development
|
25,000
|
46,000
|
Selling and
marketing
|
161,000
|
196,000
|
General and
administrative
|
392,000
|
390,000
|
|
578,000
|
632,000
|
|
|
|
Operating
loss
|
(206,000)
|
(67,000)
|
|
|
|
Other income /
(expense):
|
|
|
Interest
expense
|
(71,000)
|
(65,000)
|
Other income,
net
|
10,000
|
0
|
|
(61,000)
|
(65,000)
|
|
|
|
Net
loss before tax
|
(267,000)
|
(132,000)
|
|
|
|
Income tax
expense
|
0
|
0
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(267,000)
|
$(132,000)
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted loss per common share
|
$(0.01)
|
$(0.00)
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
number of shares outstanding – basic
|
29,822,770
|
28,842,788
|
Weighted average
number of shares outstanding – diluted
|
29,822,770
|
28,842,788
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed
financial statements
4
American Bio Medica Corporation
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
For The Three Months Ended
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
$(267,000)
|
$(132,000)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
20,000
|
22,000
|
Amortization
of debt issuance costs
|
33,000
|
31,000
|
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
(1,000)
|
0
|
Provision
for slow moving and obsolete inventory
|
21,000
|
21,000
|
Share-based
payment expense
|
4,000
|
11,000
|
Changes
in:
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
(72,000)
|
(55,000)
|
Inventory
|
64,000
|
58,000
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
36,000
|
29,000
|
Accounts
payable
|
56,000
|
0
|
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
43,000
|
(20,000)
|
Wages
payable
|
7,000
|
(12,000)
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(56,000)
|
(47,000)
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
Patent
application costs
|
(6,000)
|
(9,000)
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(6,000)
|
(9,000)
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
Proceeds
from / (payments on) debt financing
|
72,000
|
(75,000)
|
Proceeds
from lines of credit
|
1,095,000
|
1,403,000
|
Payments
on lines of credit
|
(1,049,000)
|
(1,292,000)
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
118,000
|
36,000
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
56,000
|
(20,000)
|
Cash
and cash equivalents - beginning of period
|
36,000
|
156,000
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period
|
$92,000
|
$136,000
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
|
|
|
Cash
paid during period for interest
|
$36,000
|
$40,000
|
Consulting
expense prepaid with restricted stock
|
$25,000
|
$0
|
Debt
issuance cost paid with restricted stock
|
$18,000
|
$0
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed
financial statements
5
Notes
to condensed financial statements (unaudited)
March 31, 2018
Note A - Basis of Reporting
The
accompanying unaudited interim condensed financial statements of
American Bio Medica Corporation (the “Company”) have
been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States of America (“U.S.
GAAP”) for interim financial information and in accordance
with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X. Accordingly,
these unaudited interim condensed financial statements do not
include all information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for
complete financial statement presentation. These unaudited interim
condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with
audited financial statements and related notes contained in the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2017. In the opinion of management, the interim
condensed financial statements include all normal, recurring
adjustments which are considered necessary for a fair presentation
of the financial position of the Company at March 31, 2018, and the
results of operations and cash flows for the three month periods
ended March 31, 2018 (the “First Quarter 2018”) and
March 31, 2017 (the “First Quarter 2017”).
Operating results
for the First Quarter 2018 are not necessarily indicative of
results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2018.
Amounts at December 31, 2017 are derived from audited financial
statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.
During
the First Quarter 2018, there were no significant changes to the
Company’s critical accounting policies, which are included in
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2017.
The
preparation of these interim condensed financial statements
requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect
the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses,
and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an
on-going basis, the Company evaluates estimates, including those
related to product returns, bad debts, inventories, income taxes,
warranty obligations, contingencies and litigation. The Company
bases estimates on historical experience and on various other
assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that
are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may
differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
These
unaudited interim condensed financial statements have been prepared
assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern and,
accordingly, do not include any adjustments that might result from
the outcome of this uncertainty. The independent registered public
accounting firm’s report on the financial statements included
in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2017, contained an explanatory paragraph
regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going
concern. As of the date of this report, the Company’s current
cash balances, together with cash generated from future operations
and amounts available under the Company’s credit facilities
may not be sufficient to fund operations through May 2019. The
Company’s current line of credit matures on June 29, 2020.
The maximum availability on the Company’s line of credit
remains to be $1,500,000. However, the amount available under the
Company’s line of credit is based upon the Company’s
accounts receivable and inventory. As of March 31, 2018, based on
the Company’s availability calculation, there were no
additional amounts available under the Company’s line of
credit because the Company draws any balance available on a daily
basis.
As
discussed in more detail in “Cash Flow, Outlook/Risk”,
if sales levels decline further, the Company will have reduced
availability on its line of credit due to decreased accounts
receivable balances. In addition, the Company would expect its
inventory levels to decrease if sales levels decline further, and
this would also result in reduced availability on the
Company’s line of credit. If availability under the
Company’s line of credit is not sufficient to satisfy its
working capital and capital expenditure requirements, the Company
will be required to obtain additional credit facilities or sell
additional equity securities, or delay capital expenditures. There
is no assurance that such financing will be available or that the
Company will be able to complete financing on satisfactory terms,
if at all.
Recently
Adopted Accounting Standards
The
Company adopted the following accounting standards set forth by the
Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”):
6
ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from
Contracts with Customers”, issued in May 2014,
provides guidance for revenue recognition. The core principle of
ASU 2014-09 is that a company will recognize revenue when it
transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that
reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be
entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In doing so,
companies will need to use more judgment and make more estimates
than under current guidance. Examples of the use of judgments and
estimates may include identifying performance obligations in the
contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to
include in the transaction price and allocating the transaction
price to each separate performance obligation. The update also
requires more detailed disclosures to enable users of financial
statements to understand the nature, amount, timing, and
uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with
customers. ASU 2014-09 provides for two transition methods to the
new guidance: a retrospective approach and a modified retrospective
approach. In August 2015, ASU 2015-14, “Revenue from
Contracts with Customers: Deferral of the Effective Date” was
issued as a revision to ASU 2014-09. ASU 2015-14 revised the
effective date to fiscal years, and interim periods within those
years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Subsequently, additional
updates were issued related to this topic, ASU 2016-08, ASU
2016-10, ASU 2016-12 and ASU 2016-20. Early adoption of ASU 2014-09
is permitted but not prior to periods beginning after December 15,
2016 (i.e. the original adoption date per ASU No.
2014-09).
The
Company's revenues result from the sale of goods and reflect the
consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled. The
Company records revenues based on a five-step model in accordance
with ASU 2014-09. The Company has defined purchase orders as
contracts in accordance with ASU 2014-09. For its customer
contracts, the Company’s performance obligations are
identified; which is delivering goods at a determined transaction
price, allocation of the contract transaction price with
performance obligations (when applicable), and recognition of
revenue when (or as) the performance obligation is transferred to
the customer. Goods are transferred when the customer obtains
control of the goods (which is upon shipment to the customer). The
Company's revenues are recorded at a point in time from the sale of
tangible products. Revenues are recognized when products are
shipped.
The
Company has elected the Modified Retrospective Method (the
"Cumulate Effect Method") to comply with ASU 2014-09. The
Cumulative Effect Method does not affect the amounts for the prior
periods, but requires that the current period be reported in
accordance with ASU 2014-09. ASU 2014-09 was adopted on January 1,
2018 which was the first day of the Company's 2018 fiscal year.
There was no material impact on the Company’s financial
position or results of operations.
Product
returns, discounts and allowances are variable consideration and
are recorded as a reduction of revenue in the same period that the
related sale is recorded. The Company has reviewed the overall
sales transactions for variable consideration and has determined
that these costs are not significant. The Company has not
experienced any impairment losses, has no future performance
obligations and does not capitalize costs to obtain or fulfill
contracts.
Accounting
Standards Issued; Not Yet Adopted
ASU 2018-02, “Income Statement
– Reporting Comprehensive Income”, issued in
February 2018, allows a reclassification from accumulated other
comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects
resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (enacted on December 22,
2017). The amendments in ASU 2018-02 eliminate the stranded tax
effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and will improve
the usefulness of information reported to financial statement
users. However, because the amendments only relate to the
reclassification of the income tax effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs
Act, the underlying guidance that requires that the effect of a
change in tax laws or rates be included in income from continuing
operations is not affected. The
amendments in ASU 2018-02 also require certain disclosures about
stranded tax effects. ASU 2018-02 is effective for fiscal years,
and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after
December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is
evaluating the impact of ASU 2018-02.
ASU 2016-02,
“Leases”, issued in February 2016, requires a
lessee to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset on
its balance sheet for all leases, including operating leases, with
a term greater than 12 months. Lease classification will determine
whether a lease is reported as a financing transaction in the
income statement and statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-02 does not
substantially change lessor accounting, but it does make certain
changes related to leases for which collectability of the lease
payments is uncertain or there are significant variable payments.
Additionally, ASU 2016-02 makes several other targeted amendments
including a) revising the definition of lease payments to include
fixed payments by the lessee to cover lessor costs related to
ownership of the underlying asset such as for property taxes or
insurance; b) narrowing the definition of initial direct costs
which an entity is permitted to capitalize to include only those
incremental costs of a lease that would not have been incurred if
the lease had not been obtained; c) requiring seller-lessees in a
sale-leaseback transaction to recognize the entire gain from the
sale of the underlying asset at the time of sale rather than over
the leaseback term; and d) expanding disclosures to provide
quantitative and qualitative information about lease transactions.
ASU 2016-02 is effective for all annual and interim periods
beginning January 1, 2019, and is required to be applied
retrospectively to the earliest period presented at the date of
initial application, with early adoption permitted. The Company is
evaluating the impact of ASU 2016-02.
7
ASU 2017-11, “Earnings Per
Share, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, Derivatives and
Hedging”, issued in July 2017, changes the
classification analysis of certain equity-linked financial
instruments (or embedded features) with down round features. When
determining whether certain financial instruments should be
classified as liabilities or equity instruments, a down round
feature will no longer preclude equity classification when
assessing whether the instrument is indexed to an entity’s
own stock. The amendments also clarify existing disclosure
requirements for equity-classified instruments. As a result, a
freestanding equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded
conversion option) would not be accounted for as a derivative
liability at fair value as a result of the existence of a down
round feature. For freestanding equity classified financial
instruments, the amendments require entities that present earnings
per share (EPS) in accordance with Topic 260 to recognize the
effect of the down round feature when it is triggered. That effect
is treated as a dividend and as a reduction of income available to
common shareholders in basic EPS. Convertible instruments with
embedded conversion options that have down round features are now
subject to the specialized guidance for contingent beneficial
conversion features (in Subtopic 470-20, Debt—Debt with
Conversion and Other Options), including related EPS guidance (in
Topic 260). ASU 2017-11 is effective for fiscal years, and interim
periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15,
2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the
impact of ASU 2017-11.
There
are no other accounting pronouncements issues during the First
Quarter 2018 that are expected to have or that could have a
significant impact on our financial position or results of
operations.
Reclassifications
Certain
items have been reclassified from the prior year to conform to the
current year presentation.
Note B – Inventory
Inventory is
comprised of the following:
|
March
31,
2018
|
December
31,
2017
|
|
|
|
Raw
Materials
|
$1,004,000
|
$1,023,000
|
Work In
Process
|
407,000
|
403,000
|
Finished
Goods
|
498,000
|
547,000
|
Allowance for slow
moving and obsolete inventory
|
(521,000)
|
(500,000)
|
|
$1,388,000
|
$1,473,000
|
Note C – Net Loss Per Common Share
Basic net loss per
common share is calculated by dividing the net loss by the weighted
average number of outstanding common shares during the period.
Diluted net loss per common share includes the weighted average
dilutive effect of stock options and warrants. Potential common
shares outstanding as of March 31, 2018 and 2017:
|
March
31,
2018
|
March
31,
2017
|
|
|
|
Warrants
|
2,000,000
|
2,060,000
|
Options
|
2,147,000
|
2,107,000
|
|
4,147,000
|
4,167,000
|
The
number of securities not included in the diluted net loss per share
for the First Quarter 2018 and First Quarter 2017 was 4,147,000 and
4,167,000, respectively, as their effect would have been
anti-dilutive due to the net loss in the First Quarter 2018 and
First Quarter 2017.
8
Note D – Litigation/Legal Matters
ABMC v. Premier Biotech, Inc., Todd Bailey, et al.
In
February 2017, the Company filed a complaint in the Supreme Court
of the State of New York in Columbia County against Premier Biotech
Inc., Premier Biotech Labs, LLC and its principals, including its
President Todd Bailey (“Bailey”), and Peckham
Vocational Industries, Inc. (together the
“Defendants”). Bailey formerly served as the
Company’s Vice President of Sales and Marketing and as a
sales consultant until December 23, 2016. The complaint seeks
preliminary and permanent injunctions and a temporary restraining
order against Bailey (for his benefit or the benefit of another
party or entity) related to the solicitation of Company customers
as well as damages related to any profits and revenues that would
result from actions taken by the Defendants related to Company
customers.
In
March 2017, the complaint was moved to the federal court in the
Northern District of New York. In April 2017, the Defendants filed
a motion to dismiss on the basis of jurisdiction, to which the
Company responded on April 21, 2017.
In July
2017, the Company was notified that it was not awarded a contract
with a state agency for which it has held a contract in excess of
10 years. The contract in question is included in the February 2017
complaint. The Company believes that the Defendants actions related
to this customer and a RFP that was issued by the state agency
resulted in the loss of the contract award to the Company and the
award of the contract to Peckham and Premier Biotech. This contract
historically accounted for 10-15% of the Company’s annual
revenue. The Company continued to hold a contract with the agency
through September 30, 2017. The Company did protest the award of
the contract to Peckham and Premier Biotech, and the state agency
advised the Company on July 26, 2017 that they denied the
Company’s protest of the award.
The
Company amended its complaint against the Defendants to show actual
damages caused by the Defendants and to show proprietary and
confidential information (belonging to the Company) used by the
Defendants in their response to the RFP. This confidential
information belonging to the Company enabled the Defendants to
comply with specifications of the RFP. The Defendants filed a
response to the court opposing the Company’s supplemental
motion and the Company filed reply papers to the Defendants
response on November 2, 2017.
In
January 2018, the court ruled on the motion to dismiss (that was
filed by the Defendants in April 2017). The court found that there
was jurisdiction over Bailey only. In the Company’s opinion,
this ruling does not diminish its standing in the case against
Bailey, who again in the Company’s opinion, has always been
the primary defendant. The court did not rule on the other motions
before them. In February 2018, the Company filed a motion for
reconsideration and for leave to serve a supplemental/amended
complaint. The new filing asks for reconsideration in the
jurisdiction ruling regarding Premier Biotech Inc. and addresses
the Company’s intent to further supplement its complaint
based on additional (subsequent) damage alleged by ABMC on the part
of Bailey and Premier Biotech, Inc. Given the stage of the
litigation, management is not yet able to opine on the outcome of
the case.
Todd Bailey v. ABMC
On
October 20, 2017, the Company received notice that Bailey, its
former Vice President of Sales & Marketing and sales consultant
(and the same “Bailey” discussed above) filed a
complaint against the Company in the State of Minnesota seeking
deferred commissions of $164,000 that Bailey alleges is owed to him
by the Company. On November 2, 2017, the Company filed a Notice of
Removal in this action to move the matter from state to federal
court. On November 9, 2017, the Company filed a motion to dismiss
or, in the alternative to transfer venue and consolidate, the
Bailey complaint with our litigation filed previously against
Bailey and others.
In
January 2018, the judge in the Minnesota case requested additional
briefing on the impact of ruling in the New York case that
determined there was personal jurisdiction over Bailey. The Company
filed the requested briefing as requested by the court. Given the
stage of the litigation, management is not yet able to opine on the
outcome of the case. As of the date of this report, the action in
Minnesota has been stayed while the New York motions are
decided.
Note E – Line of Credit and Debt
|
March
31,
2018
|
December
31,
2017
|
Loan and Security Agreement with Cherokee
Financial, LLC: 5 year note at an annual interest rate of 8%
plus a 1% annual oversight fee, interest only and oversight fee
paid quarterly with first payment being made on May 15, 2015,
annual principal reduction payment of $75,000 due each year
beginning on February 15, 2016, with a final balloon payment being
due on February 15, 2020. Loan is collateralized by a first
security interest in building, land and property.
|
$975,000
|
$1,050,000
|
Crestmark Line of Credit: 3 year line of
credit maturing on June 22, 2020 with interest payable at a
variable rate based on WSJ Prime plus 2% with a floor or 5.25%;
loan fee of 0.5% annually & monthly maintenance fee of 0.3% on
actual loan balance from prior month. Early termination fee of 2%
if terminated in year 2 or after (and prior to natural expiration).
Loan is collateralized by first security interest in receivables
and inventory and the all-in interest rate as of the date of this
report is 12.43%.
|
492,000
|
446,000
|
Crestmark Equipment Term Loan: 38 month
equipment loan related to the purchase of manufacturing equipment,
at an interest rate of WSJ Prime Rate plus 3%; or 7.75% as of the
date of this report.
|
28,000
|
31,000
|
Loan Agreement with Cherokee Financial
LLC: 1 year note at an annual interest rate of 12% paid
quarterly in arrears with first interest payment being due on May
15, 2018 and a balloon payment being due on February 15,
2019.
|
150,000
|
0
|
|
1,645,000
|
1,527,000
|
Less debt discount
& issuance costs (Cherokee Financial, LLC Loan)
|
(196,000)
|
(203,000)
|
Total debt,
net
|
1,449,000
|
1,324,000
|
|
|
|
Current
portion
|
729,000
|
533,000
|
Long-term portion,
net of current portion
|
$720,000
|
$791,000
|
LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT WITH CHEROKEE FINANCIAL, LLC
(“CHEROKEE”)
On
March 26, 2015, the Company entered into a LSA with Cherokee
Financial, LLC (the “Cherokee LSA”). The debt with
Cherokee is collateralized by a first security interest in real
estate and machinery and equipment. Under the Cherokee LSA, the
Company was provided the sum of $1,200,000 in the form of a 5-year
Note at an annual interest rate of 8%. The Company is making
interest only payments quarterly on the Cherokee LSA, with the
first interest payment paid on May 15, 2015. The Company is also
required to make an annual principal reduction payment of $75,000
on each anniversary of the date of the closing; with the first
principal reduction payment being made on February 15, 2016 and the
most recent principal reduction payment being made on February 15,
2018 with the proceeds received from a new term loan with Cherokee
Financial, LLC (See “Term Loan with Cherokee” within
this Note). A final balloon payment is due on March 26, 2020. In
addition to the 8% interest, the Company pays Cherokee a 1% annual
fee for oversight and administration of the loan. This oversight
fee is paid in cash and is paid contemporaneously with the
quarterly interest payments. The Company can pay off the Cherokee
loan at any time with no penalty; except that a 1% administration
fee would be required to be paid to Cherokee to close out all
participations.
The
Company received net proceeds of $80,000 after $1,015,000 of debt
payments, and $105,000 in other expenses and fees. With the
adoption of ASU No. 2015-03 in the First Quarter of Fiscal 2016,
these transaction costs (with the exception of the interest
expense) are being deducted from the balance on the Cherokee LSA
and are being amortized over the term of the debt.
9
The
Company recognized $44,000 in interest expense related to the
Cherokee LSA in the First Quarter 2018 (of which $24,000 is debt
issuance cost amortization recorded as interest expense), and
$39,000 in interest expense in the First Quarter 2017 (of which
$23,000 is debt issuance cost amortization recorded as interest
expense). The Company had $12,000 in accrued interest expense at
March 31, 2018 related to the Cherokee LSA.
As of
March 31, 2018, the balance on the Cherokee LSA is $975,000;
however the discounted balance is $779,000. As of December 31,
2017, the balance on the Cherokee LSA is $1,050,000; however the
discounted balance is $847,000.
LINE OF CREDIT WITH CRESTMARK BANK
(“CRESTMARK”)
On June
29, 2015 (the “Closing Date”), the Company entered into
a Loan and Security Agreement (“LSA”) with Crestmark
related to a revolving line of credit (the “Crestmark
LOC”). The Crestmark LOC is used for working capital and
general corporate purposes and expires on June 22,
2020.
The
Crestmark LOC provides the Company with a revolving line of credit
up to $1,500,000 (“Maximum Amount”) with a minimum loan
balance requirement of $500,000. At March 31, 2018, the Company did
not meet this minimum loan balance requirement as our balance was
$492,000. Under the LSA, Crestmark has the right to calculate (and
is calculating) interest on the minimum balance requirement rather
than the actual balance on the Crestmark LOC. The Crestmark LOC is
secured by a first security interest in the Company’s
inventory, and receivables and security interest in all other
assets of the Company (in accordance with permitted prior
encumbrances).
The
Maximum Amount is subject to an Advance Formula comprised of: 1)
90% of Eligible Accounts Receivables (excluding, receivables
remaining unpaid for more than 90 days from the date of invoice and
sales made to entities outside of the United States), and 2) up to
40% of eligible inventory plus up to 10% of Eligible Generic
Packaging Components not to exceed the lesser of $350,000
(“Inventory Sub-Cap Limit”), or 100% of the Eligible
Accounts Receivable.
So long
as any obligations are due to Crestmark, the Company must comply
with a minimum Tangible Net Worth (“TNW”) Covenant of
at least $650,000. Additionally, if a quarterly net income is
reported, the TNW covenant will increase by 50% of the reported net
income. If a quarterly net loss is reported, the TNW covenant will
remain the same as the prior quarter’s covenant amount. TNW
is defined as: Total Assets less Total Liabilities less the sum of
(i) the aggregate amount of non-trade accounts receivables,
including accounts receivables from affiliated or related persons,
(ii) prepaid expenses, (iii) deposits, (iv) net lease hold
improvements, (v) goodwill and (vi) any other asset that would be
treated as an intangible asset under GAAP; plus Subordinated Debt.
Subordinated Debt means any and all indebtedness presently or in
the future incurred by the Company to any creditor of the Company
entering into a written subordination agreement with Crestmark. The
Company was not in compliance with this covenant at December 31,
2017 however, the Company received a waiver from Crestmark for the
December 31, 2017 TNW requirement. As consideration for the
granting of the waiver, Crestmark increased the interest rate on
the Crestmark LOC from current Prime Rate plus 2% to the Prime Rate
plus 3%. The increase in interest rate was effective as of May 1,
2018. The Company was also not in compliance with the TNW covenant
at March 31, 2018; as of the date of this report, the Company is in
the process of obtaining another waiver from Crestmark. Due to
internal requirements within Crestmark, the waiver could not be
obtained prior to the date of this report. There was no additional
consideration to Crestmark for the issuance of this waiver for the
year ended December 31, 2017; rather the increase in interest rate
will remain in place until such time that the Company is back in
compliance with the TNW covenant.
If the
Company terminates the LSA prior to June 22, 2020, an early exit
fee of 2% of the Maximum Amount (plus any additional amounts owed
to Crestmark at the time of termination) would be due.
In the
event of a default of the LSA, which includes but is not limited
to, failure of the Company to make any payment when due and
non-compliance with the TNW covenant (that is not waived by
Crestmark), Crestmark is permitted to charge an Extra Rate. The
Extra Rate is the Company’s then current interest rate plus
12.75% per annum. As of the date of this report, Crestmark has not
elected to charge the Extra Rate even though the Company is not in
compliance with the TNW covenant as of March 31, 2018 as the
Company expects to receive a waiver from Crestmark.
Interest on the
Crestmark LOC is at a variable rate based on the Prime Rate plus 2%
with a floor of 5.25%. As of March 31, 2018, the interest only rate
on the Crestmark LOC was 6.75%. As of March 31, 2018, with all fees
considered (the interest rate + an Annual Loan Fee of $7,500 + a
monthly maintenance fee of 0.30% of the actual average monthly
balance from the prior month), the interest rate on the Crestmark
LOC was 11.43%. With the change in the interest rate from Prime
plus 2% to Prime plus 3% (as a result of Crestmark’s waiver
of the Company’s non-compliance with the TNW covenant), as of
the date of this report, the interest only rate is 7.75% and the
rate with all fees is 12.43%.
10
The
Company recognized $21,000 in interest expense related to the
Crestmark LOC in the First Quarter 2018, of which $8,000 was debt
issuance costs related to interest expense. The Company recognized
$26,000 in interest expense related to the Crestmark LOC in the
First Quarter 2017, of which $8,000 was debt issuance costs
related to interest expense.
Given
the nature of the administration of the Crestmark LOC, at March 31,
2018, the Company had $0 in accrued interest expense related to the
Crestmark Line of Credit, and there is $0 in additional
availability under the Crestmark LOC.
As of
March 31, 2018, the balance on the Crestmark LOC was $492,000, and
as of December 31, 2017, the balance on the Crestmark LOC was
$446,000.
EQUIPMENT LOAN WITH CRESTMARK
On May
1, 2017, the Company entered into term loan with Crestmark in the
amount of $38,000 related to the purchase of manufacturing
equipment. The equipment loan is collateralized by a first security
interest in a specific piece of manufacturing equipment. The
Company executed an amendment to its LSA and Promissory Note with
Crestmark. The amendments addressed the inclusion of the term loan
into the LSA and an extension of the Crestmark LOC. No terms of the
Crestmark LOC were changed in the amendment. The interest rate on
the term loan is the WSJ Prime Rate plus 3%; or 7.75% as of the
date of this report. The balance on the equipment loan was $28,000
as of March 31, 2018, and $31,000 as of December 31, 2017. The
Company incurred less than $1,000 in interest expense related to
the Equipment Loan in First Quarter 2018 and $0 in interest expense
in the First Quarter 2017 (as the Equipment Loan was not yet in
place). Given the Company has not yet received the waiver for the
TNW compliance at March 31, 2018, the Company is in default under
the Equipment Loan with Crestmark as of the date of this report.
This results in the Equipment Loan being due and payable if called
by Crestmark.
TERM LOAN WITH CHEROKEE
On
March 2, 2018, the Company entered into a one-year Loan Agreement
made as of February 15, 2018 (the “Closing Date”) with
Cherokee under which Cherokee provided the Company with $150,000
(the “Cherokee Term Loan”). The proceeds from the
Cherokee Term Loan were used by the Company to pay a $75,000
principal reduction payment to Cherokee and $1,000 in legal fees
incurred by Cherokee. Net proceeds (to be used for working capital
and general business purposes) were $74,000.
The
annual interest rate for the Cherokee Term Loan is 12% to be paid
quarterly in arrears with the first interest payment being due on
May 15, 2018. The Cherokee Term Loan is required to be paid in full
on February 15, 2019 unless paid off earlier (with no penalty) at
the Company’s sole discretion. In connection with the
Cherokee Term Loan, the Company issued 150,000 restricted shares of
common stock to Cherokee on March 8, 2018.
In the
event of default, this includes, but is not limited to, the
Company’s inability to make any payments due under the
Cherokee Term Loan, Cherokee has the right to increase the interest
rate on the Cherokee Term Loan to 18% and the Company would be
required to issue and additional 150,000 restricted shares of
common stock to Cherokee.
The
Company recognized $5,000 in interest expense related to the
Cherokee Term Loan in the First Quarter 2018, of which $3,000 was
debt issuance costs related to interest expense, and $0 in interest
expense in the First Quarter 2017 (as the Cherokee Term Loan was
not yet in place). The balance on the Cherokee Term Loan was
$150,000 at March 31, 2018 and $0 at December 31, 2017 (as the
Cherokee Term Loan was not yet in place).
NOTE F – Stock Options and Warrants
The
Company currently has two non-statutory stock option plans, the
Fiscal 2001 Non-statutory Stock Option Plan (the “2001
Plan”) and the 2013 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2013
Plan”). Both plans have been adopted by our Board of
Directors and approved by our shareholders. Both the 2001 Plan and
the 2013 Plan have options available for future issuance. Any
common shares issued as a result of the exercise of stock options
would be new common shares issued from our authorized issued
shares.
During
the First Quarter 2018 and the First Quarter 2017, the Company
issued 0 options to purchase shares of common stock.
11
Stock
option activity for the First Quarter 2018 and the First Quarter
2017 is summarized as follows (the figures contained within the
tables below have been rounded to the nearest
thousand):
|
First Quarter
2018
|
First Quarter
2017
|
||||
|
Shares
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value as of
March
31, 2018
|
Shares
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value as of
March
31, 2017
|
Options outstanding
at beginning of year
|
2,147,000
|
$0.13
|
|
2,107,000
|
$0.13
|
|
Granted
|
0
|
NA
|
|
0
|
NA
|
|
Exercised
|
0
|
NA
|
|
0
|
NA
|
|
Cancelled/expired
|
0
|
NA
|
|
0
|
NA
|
|
Options outstanding
at end of year
|
2,147,000
|
$0.13
|
$15,000
|
2,107,000
|
$0.13
|
$15,000
|
Options exercisable
at end of year
|
2,022,000
|
$0.13
|
|
1,485,000
|
$0.13
|
|
The
Company recognized $4,000 in share based payment expense in the
First Quarter 2018 and $11,000 in share based payment expense in
the First Quarter 2017. At March 31, 2018 there was approximately
$2,000 of total unrecognized share based payment expense related to
stock options. This cost is expected to be recognized over 2
months.
Warrants
Warrant
activity for the First Quarter 2018 and the First Quarter 2017 is
summarized as follows:
|
First Quarter
2018
|
First Quarter
2017
|
||||
|
Shares
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value as of
March
31, 2018
|
Shares
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value as of
March
31, 2017
|
Warrants
outstanding at beginning of year
|
2,060,000
|
$0.18
|
|
2,060,000
|
$0.18
|
|
Granted
|
0
|
NA
|
|
0
|
NA
|
|
Exercised
|
0
|
NA
|
|
0
|
NA
|
|
Cancelled/expired
|
60,000
|
$0.18
|
|
0
|
NA
|
|
Warrants
outstanding at end of year
|
2,000,000
|
$0.18
|
None
|
2,060,000
|
$0.18
|
None
|
Warrants
exercisable at end of year
|
2,000,000
|
$0.18
|
|
2,060,000
|
$0.18
|
|
In the
First Quarter 2018 and First Quarter 2017, the Company recognized
$0 in debt issuance and deferred finance costs related to the
issuance of the above warrants outstanding. As of March 31, 2018,
there was $0 of total unrecognized expense.
12
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
General
The following discussion and analysis provides information, which
we believe is relevant to an assessment and understanding of our
financial condition and results of operations. The discussion
should be read in conjunction with the Interim Condensed Financial
Statements contained herein and the notes thereto appearing
elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Certain statements
contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including, without
limitation, statements containing the words “believes”,
“anticipates”, “estimates”,
“expects”, “intends”,
“projects”, and words of similar import, are
forward-looking as that term is defined by the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“1995 Act”), and in
releases issued by the United State Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “Commission”). These statements are
being made pursuant to the provisions of the 1995 Act and with the
intention of obtaining the benefits of the “Safe
Harbor” provisions of the 1995 Act. We caution that any
forward-looking statements made herein are not guarantees of future
performance and that actual results may differ materially from
those in such forward-looking statements as a result of various
factors, including, but not limited to, any risks detailed herein,
in our “Risk Factors” section of our Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2017, in our most recent reports on Form
10-Q and Form 8-K and from time to time in our other filings with
the Commission, and any amendments thereto. Any forward-looking
statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is
made, and we are not undertaking any obligation to publicly update
any forward-looking statements. Readers should not place undue
reliance on these forward-looking statements.
Overview/Plan
of Operations
Sales
in the First Quarter 2018 were negatively impacted by the loss of
an account in the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31,
2017 and the expiration of another government account in the First
Quarter 2018. The account lost in 2017 is a subject of the
litigation we initiated against a former Vice President, Sales
& Marketing/Sales Consultant (See Note D –
Litigation/Legal Matters). Along with these losses, products
manufactured outside of the United States continue to dominate our
markets; especially those markets where cost is the driving
factor.
We have
reorganized and restructured our sales and marketing department,
and throughout the year ended December 31, 2017, we brought on new
products and service offerings to diversify our revenue stream
through third party relationships. These new products and services
include products for the detection of alcohol, alternative sample
options for drug testing (such as lab based oral fluid testing and
hair testing) as well as toxicology management services. We are
also now offering customers lower-cost alternatives for onsite drug
testing. We have not yet derived any significant revenue from these
additions; however, we are seeing a trend of increasing sales of
the lower cost product alternative.
We
expect new products and our ability to sell those products in new
markets will be a future growth driver. In August 2017, the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration granted over-the-counter marketing
clearance for our Rapid TOX Cup® II (an all-inclusive, urine
based drug testing cup). In January 2018, we retained a Director of
Clinical Sales to spearhead our efforts in the rehabilitation/drug
treatment, pain management and other clinical markets. We are
hopeful that this marketing clearance and the efforts of the new
sales director will enable us to further penetrate clinical
markets. We are also hopeful that the receipt of the FDA clearance
will enable us to increase our business with our laboratory
alliance. We are also re-focusing our efforts related to oral fluid
drug testing in the year ending December 31, 2018; primarily as a
result of changes in our regulatory environment and the
distribution options available for alternative oral fluid products.
And finally, we are currently discussing a number of contract
manufacturing opportunities with other entities.
Although operating
expenses continued to decline when comparing the First Quarter 2018
with the First Quarter 2017, gross profit margin was negatively
impacted as a result of manufacturing inefficiencies. We
continuously examine all expenses (operational and product costs)
in efforts to minimize losses and to work toward profitability
(when/if sales levels rebound). Our facilities have been partially
consolidated and debt has been refinanced at better interest rates
(although further improvement in rates is desirable). We also
continued to maintain a salary deferral program for our sole
executive officer and another member of senior management
throughout the First Quarter 2018. The salary deferral program
consists of a 20% salary deferral for our Chief Executive
Officer/Principal Financial Officer Melissa Waterhouse and our
non-executive VP Operations. As of March 31, 2018, we had total
deferred compensation owed of $280,000 As cash flow from operations
allows, we intend to repay portions of the deferred compensation,
however we did not make any payments on deferred compensation in
the First Quarter 2018 or the First Quarter 2017. We expect the
salary deferral program will continue for up to another 12
months.
13
Our
continued existence is dependent upon several factors, including
our ability to: 1) raise revenue levels even though we have lost
significant accounts and the market continues to be infiltrated by
product manufactured outside of the United States, 2) control
operational costs to generate positive cash flows, 3) maintain our
current credit facilities or refinance our current credit
facilities if necessary, and 4) if needed, our ability to obtain
working capital by selling additional shares of our common
stock.
Results
of operations for the First Quarter 2018 compared to the First
Quarter 2017
NET SALES: Net sales for the First
Quarter 2018 decreased $275,000, or 20.9%, when compared to net
sales in the First Quarter 2017. The decrease in sales is primarily
due to $220,000 in sales to a government account lost in the latter
part of the year ended December 31, 2017. The loss of this account
is due to actions we have alleged were taken by a former Vice
President Sales & Marketing/Sales Consultant (Todd Bailey) and,
are the subject of ongoing litigation. Other government sales
declined slightly along with international sales (which we believe
is related to timing issues). Contract manufacturing sales only
contributed slightly to the decline in sales in the First Quarter
2018 (even with the anticipated expiration of one of our contract
manufacturing agreements in 2018) since contract manufacturing
orders in the First Quarter 2017 were already decreased from prior
historic levels. Sales in the clinical market improved slightly
which minimally offset the declines discussed
previously.
GROSS PROFIT: Gross profit decreased to
35.7% of net sales in the First Quarter 2018 from 42.9% of net
sales in the First Quarter 2017. This decrease in gross profit
stems primarily from the fact that decreased sales resulted in a
decrease in the number of testing strips made in the First Quarter
2018 when compared to the First Quarter 2017. The majority of our
labor and overhead costs are fixed. When revenues decline, fewer
testing strips are produced; this results in a manufacturing
inefficiency (i.e. less fixed overhead cost absorption and a higher
amount being expensed through cost of goods). In addition, the low
product prices from foreign manufacturers have required us to
decrease pricing of our own products to be more competitive. We are
closely examining our production schedules and requirements and
anticipate making adjustments to our production schedule to
mitigate any future inefficiencies.
OPERATING EXPENSES: Operating expenses
decreased $54,000, or 8.5%, in the First Quarter 2018 compared to
the First Quarter 2017. Expenses in research and development and
selling and marketing decreased while general and administrative
expense increased slightly. More specifically:
Research and development (“R&D”)
R&D
expense decreased $21,000, or 45.7%, when comparing the First
Quarter 2018 with the First Quarter 2017. Decreased FDA compliance
costs (associated with the timing of actions taken related to our
FDA marketing clearance application) were the primary reason for
the decline in expenses. All other expense remained relatively
consistent with expense in the First Quarter 2017. In the First
Quarter 2018, our R&D department primarily focused their
efforts on the enhancement of our current products and the
evaluation of potential contract manufacturing
opportunities.
Selling and marketing
Selling
and marketing expense in the First Quarter 2018 decreased $35,000,
or 17.9% when compared to the First Quarter 2017. Reductions in
sales & marketing salaries and benefits (due to decreased sales
and marketing personnel) were partially offset by increased costs
related to trade show attendance and postage (as we increase our
efforts related to sales in the clinical markets). In the First
Quarter 2018, we promoted additional products (through
relationships with third parties) for the detection of alcohol,
alternative sample options for drug testing (such as lab based oral
fluid testing and hair testing) as well as toxicology management
services and lower-cost alternatives for onsite drug testing. The
addition of these offerings did not result in a material increase
in selling and marketing expense. In the First Quarter 2018, we
re-focused our efforts related to oral fluid drug testing;
primarily as a result of changes in our regulatory environment and
the distribution options available for alternative oral fluid
products. With the addition of a Director of Clinical Sales
(retained in January 2018), we have also increased our marketing
efforts in the rehabilitation/drug treatment, pain management and
other clinical markets.
General and administrative (“G&A”)
G&A
expense increased $2,000, or less than 1%, in the First Quarter
2018 when compared to G&A expense in the First Quarter 2017.
Increases in amortization of financial advisory fees, accounting
fees, legal fees (associated with the ABMC vs. Bailey, et al
litigation), and fees associated with our ISO certification (as
2018 was a recertification year and 2017 was a renewal year) were
virtually offset by decreased costs associated with patents (due to
less patent activity in 2018), consulting fees and share based
payment expense (due to less options outstanding subject to
amortization). Share based payment expense was $4,000 in the First
Quarter 2018 compared to $11,000 in the First Quarter
2017.
14
Other income and expense:
Other
expense in the First Quarter 2018 consisted of interest expense
associated with our credit facilities (our line of credit and
equipment loan with Crestmark Bank and our two loans with Cherokee
Financial, LLC), offset by other income related to gains on certain
liabilities. Other expense in the First Quarter 2017 consisted of
interest expense (related to our line of credit with Crestmark Bank
and our loan and security agreement with Cherokee Financial,
LLC).
Liquidity and Capital Resources as of March 31, 2018
Our
cash requirements depend on numerous factors, including but not
limited to manufacturing costs (such as raw materials, equipment,
etc.), selling and marketing initiatives, product development
activities, regulatory costs, legal costs associated with current
litigation, and effective management of inventory levels and
production levels in response to sales forecasts. We expect to
devote capital resources related to selling and marketing
initiatives and we expect that we will incur increased legal costs
due to ongoing litigation in the year ending December 31, 2018. We
are examining other growth opportunities including strategic
alliances. Given our current and historical cash position, such
activities would need to be funded from the issuance of additional
equity or additional credit borrowings, subject to market and other
conditions. Our financial statements for the year ended December
31, 2017 were prepared assuming we will continue as a going
concern.
Our
current cash balances, together with cash generated from future
operations and amounts available under our credit facilities may
not be sufficient to fund operations through May 2019. Our current
line of credit expires on June 22, 2020 and has a maximum
availability of $1,500,000. However, the amount available under our
line of credit is based upon the balance of our accounts receivable
and inventory so, we do not have the maximum available to borrow.
As of March 31, 2018, based on our availability calculation, there
were no additional amounts available under our line of credit
because we draw any balance available on a daily basis. If sales
levels continue to decline, we will have reduced availability on
our line of credit due to decreased accounts receivable balances.
In addition, we would expect our inventory levels to decrease if
sales levels decline further, which would result in further reduced
availability on our line of credit. If availability under our line
of credit is not sufficient to satisfy our working capital and
capital expenditure requirements, we will be required to obtain
additional credit facilities or sell additional equity securities,
or delay capital expenditures which could have a material adverse
effect on our business. There is no assurance that such financing
will be available or that we will be able to complete financing on
satisfactory terms, if at all.
As of
March 31, 2018, we had the following debt/credit
facilities:
Facility
|
|
Debtor
|
Balance
as of
March
31,
2018
|
Loan and Security
Agreement
|
|
Cherokee Financial,
LLC
|
$975,000
|
Revolving Line of
Credit
|
|
Crestmark
Bank
|
$492,000
|
Equipment
Loan
|
|
Crestmark
Bank
|
$28,000
|
Term
Loan
|
|
Cherokee Financial,
LLC
|
$150,000
|
Total
Debt
|
|
|
$1,645,000
|
Working Capital
Our
working capital decreased $294,000 to $183,000 at the end of the
First Quarter 2018 from $477,000 at year end December 31, 2017.
This decrease in working capital is primarily the result of
decreased sales. We have historically satisfied working capital
requirements through cash from operations and bank
debt.
Dividends
We have
never paid any dividends on our common shares and anticipate that
all future earnings, if any, will be retained for use in our
business, and therefore, we do not anticipate paying any cash
dividends.
Cash Flow, Outlook/Risk
We have
taken steps (and will continue to take steps) to ensure that
operating expenses and manufacturing costs remain in line with
sales levels, however, we are incurring increased costs related to
litigation and other administrative requirements. In early 2018, we
also took steps (and will incur additional sales and marketing
expense) to further penetrate the rehabilitation/drug treatment,
pain management and other clinical markets. To offset these
investments, we consolidated job responsibilities in other areas of
the Company and this enabled us to implement personnel
reductions.
15
The
decline in sales has resulted in lower than average cash balances
and lower availability on our line of credit. Two large government
accounts (one of which was in the year ended December 31, 2017 and
the other in the year ended December 31, 2016) were lost due to
alleged actions on the part of a former Vice President Sales and
Marketing/Sales Consultant (Todd Bailey) and are the subject of
ongoing litigation. These two accounts represented approximately
$1,000,000 in annual sales to the Company (of which approximately
$800,000 will impact sales revenues in the year ending December 31,
2018 (when compared to the year ended December 31, 2017). We are
also experiencing declines in other areas of direct sales. To
address the declines, we are promoting new products and service
offerings to diversify our revenue stream. These new products and
services (through relationships with third parties) include
products for the detection of alcohol, alternative sample options
for drug testing (such as lab based oral fluid testing and hair
testing) as well as toxicology management services and lower-cost
alternatives for onsite drug testing. We are also re-focusing our
efforts related to oral fluid drug testing in the year ending
December 31, 2018; primarily as a result of changes in our
regulatory environment and the distribution options available for
alternative oral fluid products. And finally, we are currently
discussing a number of contract manufacturing opportunities with
other entities.
Our
ability to remain compliant with our obligations under our current
credit facilities will depend on our ability to replace lost sales
and further increase sales. Our ability to repay our current debt
may also be affected by general economic, financial, competitive,
regulatory, business and other factors beyond our control,
including those discussed herein. If we are unable to meet our
credit facility obligations, we would be required to raise money
through new equity and/or debt financing(s) and, there is no
assurance that we would be able to find new financing, or that any
new financing would be at favorable terms.
We were
not in compliance with the TNW covenant under our Crestmark LOC as
of December 31, 2017 or March 31, 2018; however, we received a
waiver from Crestmark for the year ended December 31, 2017. . As of
the date of this report, the Company is in the process of obtaining
another waiver from Crestmark related to the TNW non-compliance for
the quarter ended March 31, 2018. Due to internal requirements
within Crestmark, the waiver could not be obtained prior to the
date of this report. As consideration for the granting of the
waiver for the year ended December 31, 2017, Crestmark increased
our interest rate on the Crestmark Line of Credit from the current
Prime Rate plus 2% to the Prime Rate plus 3%, effective as of May
1, 2018. A failure to comply with the TNW covenant under our
Crestmark Line of Credit (a failure that is not waived by
Crestmark) could result in an event of default, which, if not
cured, could result in the Company being required to pay much
higher costs associated with the indebtedness. Also,
the Company has not yet received the waiver for the TNW compliance
at March 31, 2018, the Company is in default under the Equipment
Loan with Crestmark as of the date of this report. This results in
the Equipment Loan being due and payable if called by Crestmark. If
we are forced to refinance our debt on less favorable terms, our
results of operations and financial condition could be adversely
affected by increased costs and rates. We may also be forced to
pursue one or more alternative strategies, such as restructuring,
selling assets, reducing or delaying capital expenditures or
seeking additional equity capital. There can be no assurances that
any of these strategies could be implemented on satisfactory terms,
if at all.
If
events and circumstances occur such that 1) we do not meet our
current operating plans to increase sales, 2) we are unable to
raise sufficient additional equity or debt financing, or 3) our
credit facilities are insufficient or not available, we may be
required to further reduce expenses or take other steps which could
have a material adverse effect on our future
performance.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
As a
smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide the
information required by this item.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)/Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer), together with
other members of management, has reviewed and evaluated the
effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and
procedures” (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the period
covered by this report. Based on this review and evaluation, our
Principal Executive Officer/Principal Financial Officer concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure
that material information relating to the Company is recorded,
processed, summarized, and reported in a timely
manner.
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
There
have been no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting during the last quarterly period covered by this report
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
16
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
See
Part I, Item 1, Note D in the Notes to interim condensed Financial
Statements included in this report for a description of pending
legal proceedings in which we may be a party.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There
have been no material changes to our risk factors set forth in Part
I, Item 1A, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2017.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
As
previously disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 8, 2018, in connection
with our Term Loan with Cherokee Financial, LLC, we were required
to issue 150,000 restricted shares of common stock to Cherokee
Financial, LLC within 30 days of March 2, 2018 (the execution date
of the term loan). We issued the required shares on March 8,
2018.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not
applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive
Officer/Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
101
|
|
The
following materials from our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2018, formatted in XBRL (Extensible
Business Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Balance Sheet, (ii)
Condensed Statements of Income (iii) Condensed Statements of Cash
Flows, and (iv) Notes to Condensed Financial
Statements.
|
17
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the
registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
AMERICAN BIO MEDICA
CORPORATION
|
|
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: May 14,
2018
|
By:
|
/s/
Melissa
A. Waterhouse
|
|
|
|
Melissa A. Waterhouse |
|
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Principal Financial
Officer
Principal
Accounting Officer |
|
18