AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES - Annual Report: 2005 (Form 10-K)
Table of Contents
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
þ | Annual Report Pursuant To Section 13 or 15(d) Of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For The Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2005
or
o | Transition Report Pursuant To Section 13 or 15(d) Of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For The Transition Period From to .
Commission file number 1-08789
American Shared Hospital Services
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
California (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
94-2918118 (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3700, San Francisco, California (Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
94111-4107 (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (415) 788-5300
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class | Name of each exchange on which registered | |
Common Stock No Par Value | American Stock Exchange | |
Pacific Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of
the Securities Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is
not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a
non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated Filer o Non-accelerated Filer þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes o No þ
As of June 30, 2005, the aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant was approximately $21,993,000.
Number of shares of common stock of the registrant outstanding as of March 10, 2006: 5,018,885.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants definitive Proxy Statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
12 | ||||||||
14 | ||||||||
14 | ||||||||
14 | ||||||||
14 | ||||||||
16 | ||||||||
17 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
26 | ||||||||
27 | ||||||||
27 | ||||||||
28 | ||||||||
28 | ||||||||
28 | ||||||||
28 | ||||||||
28 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 10.23A | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 10.50 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 10.50A | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 21 | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 31.(A) | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 31.(B) | ||||||||
EXHIBIT 32 |
2
Table of Contents
PART I
ITEM 1.
BUSINESS
GENERAL
American Shared Hospital Services (ASHS and, together with its subsidiaries, the Company)
provides Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery services to twenty-one (21) medical centers in
eighteen (18) states. The Company provides these services through its 81% indirect interest in GK
Financing, LLC, a California limited liability company (GKF). The remaining 19% of GKF is owned
by GKV Investments, Inc., a wholly owned U.S. subsidiary of Elekta AG, a Swedish company
(Elekta). Elekta is the manufacturer of the Leksell Gamma Knifeâ (the Gamma Knife). GKF
is a non-exclusive provider of alternative financing services for Elekta in the United States and
Brazil. Gamma Knife services accounted for 100% of the Companys revenue in 2005.
At present, the Company is developing its design and business model for The Operating Room for the
21st Centuryâ (OR21â). OR21 is not expected to generate significant
revenue within the next twelve months.
The Company was incorporated in the State of California in 1983 and its predecessor, Ernest A.
Bates, M.D., Ltd. (d/b/a American Shared Hospital Services), a California limited partnership, was
formed in June 1980.
GAMMA KNIFE OPERATIONS
Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery, a non-invasive procedure, is an alternative to conventional
brain surgery or can be an adjunct to conventional brain surgery. Compared to conventional
surgery, Gamma Knife surgery usually involves shorter patient hospitalization, lower risk of
complications and can be provided at a lower cost. Typically, Gamma Knife patients resume their
pre-surgical activities one or two days after treatment. The Gamma Knife treats patients with 201
single doses of gamma rays that are focused with great precision on small and medium size, well
circumscribed and critically located structures in the brain. The Gamma Knife delivers the
concentrated dose of gamma rays from 201 sources of Cobalt-60 housed in the Gamma Knife. The 201
Cobalt-60 sources converge at the target area and deliver a dose that is high enough to destroy the
diseased tissue without damaging surrounding healthy tissue.
The Gamma Knife treats selected malignant brain tumors, benign brain tumors,
trigeminal neuralgia (facial pain)
and arteriovenous malformations. Research is being conducted to determine whether the Gamma Knife
can be effective in the treatment of epilepsy and other functional disorders.
3
Table of Contents
As of December 31, 2005, there were 103 Gamma Knife sites in the United States and 234 units in
operation worldwide. An estimated percentage breakdown of Gamma Knife procedures performed in the
U.S. by indications treated is as follows: malignant (44%) and benign (29%) brain tumors,
functional disorders (14%) and vascular disorders (13%).
The Company, as of March 10, 2006, has twenty-one (21) Gamma Knife units operating at twenty-one
(21) sites in the United States. The Companys first Gamma Knife commenced operation in September
1991. The Companys Gamma Knife units performed approximately 2,400 procedures in 2005 for a
cumulative total of approximately 14,000 procedures through December 31, 2005.
Gamma Knife revenue for the Company during the five (5) years ended December 31, and the percentage
of total revenue of the Company represented by the Gamma Knife for each of the last five years, are
set forth below:
Year Ended | Total Gamma Knife | Gamma Knife/ | ||||||
December 31, | Revenue (in thousands) | Total Revenue | ||||||
2005 |
$ | 18,231 | 100.0 | % | ||||
2004 |
$ | 16,389 | 100.0 | % | ||||
2003 |
$ | 16,178 | 100.0 | % | ||||
2002 |
$ | 13,366 | 100.0 | % | ||||
2001 |
$ | 11,758 | 100.0 | % |
The Company conducts its Gamma Knife business through its 81% indirect interest in GKF. The
remaining 19% interest is indirectly owned by Elekta. GKF, formed in October 1995, is managed by
its policy committee. The policy committee is composed of one representative from the Company,
Ernest A. Bates, M.D., ASHSs Chairman and CEO, and one representative from Elekta. The policy
committee sets the operating policy for GKF. The policy committee may act only with the unanimous
approval of both of its members. The policy committee selects a manager to handle GKFs daily
operations. Craig K. Tagawa, Chief Executive Officer of GKF and Chief Operating and Financial
Officer of ASHS, serves as GKFs manager.
GKFs profits and/or losses and any cash distributions are allocated based on membership interests.
GKFs Operating Agreement requires that it have a cash reserve of at least $50,000 before cash
distributions are made to its members. From inception to December 31, 2005, GKF has distributed
$17,010,000 to the Company and $3,990,000 to the minority partner.
Additional information on our operations can be found in Item 6Selected Financial Data, Item
7Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note
1 of our consolidated financial statements beginning on page [A-8] of this report.
CUSTOMERS
The Companys current business is the outsourcing of Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery
4
Table of Contents
services. The Company typically provides the Gamma Knife equipment, as well as planning,
installation, reimbursement and marketing support services. Customers usually pay the Company on a
fee per use basis. The market for these services primarily consists of major urban medical
centers. The Gamma Knife business is capital intensive. The total cost of a Gamma Knife facility
usually ranges from $3 million to $4 million, including equipment, site construction and
installation. The Company pays for the Gamma Knife and the medical center generally pays for site
and installation costs. The following is a listing of the Companys current sites as of March 10,
2006:
5
Table of Contents
Customer | Original Term | Year Contract | ||||||||||
Existing sites | of Contract | Began | Basis of Payment | |||||||||
UCSF Medical Center |
10 years (1) | 1991 | Fee per use | |||||||||
San Francisco, California |
||||||||||||
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian |
10 years | 1997 | Fee per use | |||||||||
Newport Beach, California |
||||||||||||
Southwest Texas Methodist Hospital |
10 years | 1998 | Fee per use | |||||||||
San Antonio, Texas |
||||||||||||
Yale New Haven Ambulatory Services Corporation |
10 years | 1998 | Revenue sharing | |||||||||
New Haven, Connecticut |
||||||||||||
Kettering Medical Center |
10 years | 1999 | Fee per use | |||||||||
Kettering, Ohio |
||||||||||||
New England Medical Center |
10 years | 1999 | Fee per use | |||||||||
Boston, Massachusetts |
||||||||||||
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences |
15 years | 1999 | Revenue sharing | |||||||||
Little Rock, Arkansas |
||||||||||||
Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital |
10 years | 1999 | Fee per use | |||||||||
Milwaukee, Wisconsin |
||||||||||||
JFK Medical Center |
10 years | 2000 | Fee per use | |||||||||
Edison, New Jersey |
||||||||||||
Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center |
10 years | 2001 | Fee per use | |||||||||
Las Vegas, Nevada |
||||||||||||
Central Mississippi Medical Center |
10 years | 2001 | Fee per use | |||||||||
Jackson, Mississippi |
||||||||||||
OSF Saint Francis Medical Center |
10 years | 2001 | Fee per use | |||||||||
Peoria, Illinois |
||||||||||||
Bayfront Medical Center |
10 years | 2002 | Fee per use | |||||||||
St. Petersburg, Florida |
||||||||||||
Mercy Medical Center |
10 years | 2002 | Fee per use | |||||||||
Rockville Center, New York |
||||||||||||
The Johns Hopkins Hospital |
10 years | 2003 | Revenue Sharing | |||||||||
Baltimore, Maryland |
||||||||||||
Baptist Medical Center |
8 years | 2003 | Revenue Sharing | |||||||||
Jacksonville, Florida |
||||||||||||
Albuquerque Regional Medical Center |
10 years | 2003 | Fee per use | |||||||||
Albuquerque, New Mexico |
||||||||||||
Lehigh Valley Hospital |
10 years | 2004 | Fee per use | |||||||||
Allentown, Pennsylvania |
||||||||||||
Baptist Hospital of East Tennessee |
10 years | 2005 | Revenue Sharing | |||||||||
Knoxville, Tennessee |
||||||||||||
Northern Westchester Hospital |
10 years | 2005 | Fee per use | |||||||||
Mt. Kisco, New York |
||||||||||||
Mercy Health Center |
10 years | 2005 | Revenue Sharing | |||||||||
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma |
6
Table of Contents
(1) | The UCSF contract has been extended with a current expiration date in 2011. |
The Company currently has no sites under development.
The Companys fee per use agreement is typically for a ten-year term. The fixed fee per use
reimbursement amount that the Company receives from the customer is based on the Companys cost to
provide the service and the anticipated volume of the customer. The contracts signed by the
Company typically call for a fee ranging from $7,500 to $9,000 per procedure. There are no minimum
volume guarantees required of the customer. Typically, GKF is responsible for providing the Gamma
Knife and related ongoing Gamma Knife equipment expenses (i.e., personal property taxes, insurance,
equipment maintenance) and also helps fund the customers Gamma Knife marketing. The customer
generally is obligated to pay site and installation costs and the costs of operating the Gamma
Knife. The customer can either renew the agreement or terminate the agreement at the end of the
contractual term. If the customer chooses to terminate the agreement, then GKF removes the
equipment from the medical center for possible placement at another site.
The Companys revenue sharing agreements (retail) are for a period of eight to fifteen years.
Instead of receiving a fixed fee, the Company receives all or a percentage of the reimbursement
(exclusive of physician fees) received by the customer less the operating expenses of the Gamma
Knife. The Company is at risk for any reimbursement rate changes for Gamma Knife services by the
government or other third party payors. The Company is also at risk if it inefficiently operates
the Gamma Knife. There are no minimum volume guarantees required of the customer.
No individual customers accounted for more than 10% of the Companys revenue in 2005, 2004 and
2003.
MARKETING
The Company markets its services through its preferred provider status with Elekta and a direct
sales effort. From April 2003 to March 2004, the direct sales effort was executed by the Companys
Chief Executive and Chief Operating Officers. Since March 2004, the Company has had a Director of
Sales to lead the direct sales effort. The major advantages to a health care provider in
contracting with the Company for Gamma Knife services include:
| The medical center avoids the high cost of owning the equipment. By not acquiring the Gamma Knife unit, the medical center is able to allocate the funds required to purchase and/or finance the Gamma Knife to other projects. |
| The medical center avoids the risk of Gamma Knife under-utilization. The Company does not have minimum volume requirements. The medical center pays the Company only for each Gamma Knife procedure performed on a patient. |
| The medical center transfers the risk of technological obsolescence to the Company. The medical center and its physicians are not under any obligation to utilize technologically obsolete equipment. |
7
Table of Contents
| The Company provides planning, installation, operating and marketing assistance and support to its Gamma Knife customers. |
FINANCING
The Companys Gamma Knife business is operated through GKF. Through 2003, GKF funded its existing
Gamma Knife units with loans from a single lender, DVI Financial Services Inc. (DVI), for 100% of
the cost of each Gamma Knife, plus any sales tax, customs and duties. Alternative lenders were
utilized for financing the Companys Gamma Knife units that opened during 2004 and 2005. The loans
are predominantly fully amortized over an 84-month period. The loans are collateralized by the
Gamma Knife, customer contracts and accounts receivable, and are without recourse to the Company
and Elekta.
DVI filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection during 2003, and all the Companys loans with DVI
were subsequently assumed by another lender as successor servicer. The Company continues to make
payments to the successor servicer on these outstanding note balances. Management believes that
the financial condition of DVI has not had a materially adverse effect on the Companys financial
position or results of operations.
COMPETITION
Conventional neurosurgery is the primary competitor of Gamma Knife radiosurgery. Gamma Knife
surgery is gaining acceptance as an alternative and/or adjunct to conventional surgery due to its
more favorable morbidity outcomes for certain procedures as well as its non-invasiveness.
Utilization of the Companys Gamma Knife units is contingent on the acceptance of Gamma Knife
radiosurgery by the customers neurosurgeons, radiation oncologists and referring physicians. In
addition, the utilization of the Companys Gamma Knife units is impacted by the proximity of
competing Gamma Knife centers and providers using other radiosurgery modalities.
The Companys ability to secure additional customers for Gamma Knife services is dependent on its
ability to effectively compete against (i) Elekta, the manufacturer of the Gamma Knife, (ii)
manufacturers of other radiosurgery devices (primarily modified linear accelerators), and (iii)
other companies that outsource Gamma Knife services. The Company does not have an exclusive
relationship with Elekta and has previously lost sales to customers that chose to purchase a Gamma
Knife directly from Elekta. The Company may continue to lose future sales to such customers and
may also lose sales to the Companys competitors.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
The Companys Gamma Knife customers receive payments for patient care from federal government and
private insurer reimbursement programs. Currently in the United States, Gamma Knife services are
performed on an in-patient and on an out-patient basis. Gamma Knife patients with Medicare as
their primary insurer and treated on either an in-patient or out-patient basis, comprise an
estimated 20% to 35% of the total Gamma Knife patients treated.
8
Table of Contents
A Prospective Payment System (PPS) is utilized to reimburse hospitals for care given to hospital
in-patients covered by federally funded reimbursement programs. Patients are classified into a
Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) in accordance with the patients diagnosis, necessary medical
procedures and other factors. Patient reimbursement is limited to a predetermined amount for each
DRG. The reimbursement payment may not necessarily cover the cost of all medical services actually
provided because the payment is predetermined. Effective October 1, 1997, Gamma Knife services for
Medicare hospital in-patients are predominantly reimbursed under either DRG 7 or DRG 8.
In 1986 and again in 1990, Congress enacted legislation requiring the Department of Health and
Human Services (DHHS) to develop proposals for a PPS for Medicare out-patient services. DHHS
proposed a new payment system, Ambulatory Product Classifications (APC), which affects all
out-patient services performed in a hospital based facility. APC implementation took place in the
third quarter of 2000.
The APC consists of 346 clinically, homogenous classifications or groupings of codes that are
typically used in out-patient billing. Out-patient services are bundled with fixed rates of
payment determined according to specific regional and national factors, similar to that of the
in-patient PPS.
The Gamma Knife APC rate is modified periodically but the total reimbursement amount has remained
fairly constant. However, effective January 1, 2006, the Medicare outpatient reimbursement rate
for Gamma Knife procedures is scheduled to increase approximately 28% compared to the 2005 rate of
reimbursement. The Company has four contracts from which its revenue is directly affected by
changes in payment rates under the APC system. Some of the Companys fee per use customers treat
patients on an out-patient basis and may also experience an increase in Medicare payment in 2006.
The payment of remuneration to induce the referral of health care business has been a subject of
increasing governmental and regulatory focus in recent years. Section 1128B(b) of the Social
Security Act (sometimes referred to as the federal anti-kickback statute) provides criminal
penalties for individuals or entities that knowingly and willfully offer, pay, solicit or receive
remuneration in order to induce referrals for items or services for which payment may be made under
the Medicare and Medicaid programs and certain other government funded programs. The Social
Security Act provides authority to the Office of Inspector General through civil proceedings to
exclude an individual or entity from participation in the Medicare and state health programs if it
is determined any such party has violated Section 1128B(b) of the Social Security Act. The Company
believes that it is in compliance with the federal anti-kickback statute. Additionally, the
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, often referred to as Stark II, bans physician
self-referrals to providers of designated health services with which the physician has a financial
relationship. The term designated health services includes, among others, radiation therapy
services and in-patient and out-patient hospital services. On January 1, 1995, the Physician
Ownership and Referral Act of 1993 became effective in California. This legislation prohibits
physician self-referrals for covered goods and services, including radiation oncology, if the
physician (or the physicians immediate family) concurrently has a financial
9
Table of Contents
interest in the entity receiving the referral. The Company believes that it is in compliance with
these rules and regulations.
A range of federal civil and criminal laws target false claims and fraudulent billing activities.
One of the most significant is the Federal False Claims Act, which prohibits the submission of a
false claim or the making of a false record or statement in order to secure a reimbursement from a
government-sponsored program. In recent years, the federal government has launched several
initiatives aimed at uncovering practices which violate false claims or fraudulent billing laws.
Claims under these laws may be brought either by the government or by private individuals on behalf
of the government, through a whistleblower or qui tam action. The Company believes that it is
in compliance with the Federal False Claims Act; however, because such actions are filed under seal
and may remain secret for years, there can be no assurance that the Company or one of its
affiliates is not named in a material qui tam action.
Legislation in various jurisdictions requires that health facilities obtain a Certificate of Need
(CON) prior to making expenditures for medical technology in excess of specified amounts. Four
of the Companys existing customers were required to obtain a CON or its equivalent. The CON
procedure can be expensive and time consuming and may impact the length of time before Gamma Knife
services commence. CON requirements vary from state to state in their application to the
operations of both the Company and its customers. In some jurisdictions the Company is required to
comply with CON procedures to provide its services and in other jurisdictions customers must comply
with CON procedures before using the Companys services.
The Companys Gamma Knife units contain Cobalt 60 radioactive sources. The medical centers that
house the Companys Gamma Knife units are responsible for obtaining possession and users licenses
for the Cobalt 60 source.
The Company believes it is in substantial compliance with the various rules and regulations that
affect its businesses.
INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION
The Companys contracts with equipment vendors generally do not contain indemnification provisions.
The Company maintains a comprehensive insurance program covering the value of its property and
equipment, subject to deductibles, which the Company believes are reasonable.
The Companys customer contracts generally contain mutual indemnification provisions. The Company
maintains general and professional liability insurance. The Company is not involved in the
practice of medicine and therefore believes its present insurance coverage and indemnification
agreements are adequate for its business.
10
Table of Contents
EMPLOYEES
At December 31, 2005, the Company employed twelve (12) people on a full-time basis. None of these
employees is subject to a collective bargaining agreement and there is no union representation
within the Company. The Company maintains various employee benefit plans and believes that its
employee relations are good.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY
The following table provides current information concerning those persons who serve as executive
officers of the Company. The executive officers were appointed by the Board of Directors and serve
at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
Name: | Age: | Position: | ||||
Ernest A. Bates, M.D.
|
69 | Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Craig K. Tagawa
|
52 | Senior Vice President Chief Operating and Financial Officer |
Ernest A. Bates, M.D., founder of the Company, has served in the positions listed above since
the incorporation of the Company. He is currently Vice Chairman of the Board of Trustees of The
Johns Hopkins University, a member of the Board of Trustees at the University of Rochester, a
member of the Board of Overseers of the University of California at San Francisco School of
Nursing, a member of the Board of Directors of Copia and the Capital Campaign Chairman and a Board
Member of the Museum of African Diaspora. Dr. Bates is also a member of the State of California
Commission for Jobs and Economic Growth, a member of the Board of Directors of Salzburg Seminar, a
board member of the Center for Fastercures-Milken Institute and a member of the Brookings
Institution. Dr. Bates is a graduate of The Johns Hopkins University and the University of
Rochester School of Medicine.
Craig K. Tagawa has served as Chief Operating Officer since February 1999 in addition to serving as
Chief Financial Officer since May 1996. Mr. Tagawa also served as Chief Financial Officer from
January 1992 through October 1995. Previously a Vice President in such capacity, Mr. Tagawa became
a Senior Vice President on February 28, 1993. He is also the Chief Executive Officer of GKF. From
September 1988 through January 1992, Mr. Tagawa served in various positions with the Company. He
is currently a Chair of the Industrial Policy Advisory Committee of the Engineering Research Center
for Computer-Integrated Surgical Systems and Technology at The Johns Hopkins University. He
received his Undergraduate degree from the University of California at Berkeley and his M.B.A from
Cornell University.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
Our Internet address is www.ashs.com. We make available free of charge through our Internet
website our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form
8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed
11
Table of Contents
with or furnished to the SEC. The information contained on our Internet website is not part of
this document.
ITEM 1a.
RISK FACTORS
In addition to the other information in this report, the following factors could affect our future
business, results of operations, cash flows or financial position, and could cause future results
to differ materially from those expressed in any of the forward-looking statements contained in
this report.
The Companys Capital Investment in Each Gamma Knife Unit is Substantial
Each Gamma Knife unit requires a substantial capital investment. In some cases, we contribute
additional funds for capital costs and/or annual operating and equipment related costs such as
marketing, maintenance, insurance and property taxes. Due to the structure of our contracts with
medical centers, there can be no assurance that these costs will be fully recovered or that we will
earn a satisfactory return on our investment.
The Market for the Gamma Knife is Limited
There is a limited market for the Gamma Knife. Due to the substantial costs of acquiring a Gamma
Knife unit, we must identify medical centers that possess neurosurgery and radiation oncology
departments capable of performing a large number of Gamma Knife procedures. As of December 31,
2005 there were 103 operating Gamma Knife units in the United States, of which 21 units are owned
by us, and 234 units in operation worldwide. There can be no assurance that we will be successful
in placing additional units at a significant number of sites in the future.
The Company Has a High Level of Debt
The Companys business is capital intensive and it has traditionally financed each Gamma Knife with
debt. The combined long term debt and present value of capital leases totals $25,082,000 and is
collateralized by the Gamma Knife units and other assets, including accounts receivable and future
proceeds from any contract between the Company and any end user of the financed equipment. This
high level of debt may adversely affect the Companys ability to secure additional credit in the
future, and as a result may affect operations and profitability. If default on debt occurs in the
future, the Companys creditors would have the ability to accelerate the defaulted loan, to seize
the Gamma Knife unit with respect to which default has occurred, and to apply any collateral they
may have at the time to cure the default.
The Market is Competitive
There are currently three companies (in addition to our company) that actively provide alternative,
non-conventional Gamma Knife financing to potential customers. We believe there are no competitor
companies that currently have more than six Gamma Knife units in operation. The Companys
relationship with Elekta, the manufacturer of the Leksell Gamma Knife unit, is non-exclusive, and
in the past the Company has lost sales to customers that chose to purchase a Gamma Knife unit
directly from Elekta. In addition, the Company may continue to lose future sales to such customers
and may also lose future sales to its competitors. There can be no
12
Table of Contents
assurance that the Company will be able to successfully compete against others in placing future
units.
There Are Alternatives to the Gamma Knife
There are several methods of radiosurgery (including the modified linear accelerator) as well as
conventional neurosurgery that compete against the Gamma Knife. Each of the medical centers
targeted by the Company could decide to acquire another radiosurgery modality instead of a Gamma
Knife. In addition, neurosurgeons who are primarily responsible for referring patients for Gamma
Knife surgery may not be willing to make such referrals for various reasons, instead opting for
invasive surgery. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to secure a sufficient
number of future sites or Gamma Knife procedures to sustain its profitability and growth.
The Companys Revenue Could Decline if Federal Reimbursement Rates are Lowered
The amount reimbursed to medical centers for each Gamma Knife treatment may decline in the future.
The reimbursement decrease may come from federally mandated programs (i.e., Medicare and Medicaid)
or other third party payor groups. Fifteen of the Companys existing contracts are reimbursed by
the medical center to the Company on a fee per use basis. The primary risk under this type of
contract is that the actual volume of procedures could be less than projected. However, a
significant reimbursement rate reduction may result in the Company restructuring certain of its
existing contracts. There are also six contracts where the Company receives revenue based directly
on the amount of reimbursement received for procedures performed. Revenue under those contracts
and any future contracts with revenue based directly on reimbursement amounts will be impacted by
any reimbursement rate change. Some of the Companys future contracts for Gamma Knife services may
have revenue based on such reimbursement rates instead of a fee for service basis. There can be no
assurance that future changes in healthcare regulations and reimbursement rates will not directly
or indirectly adversely affect the Companys Gamma Knife revenue.
New Technology and Products Could Result in Equipment Obsolescence
There is constant change and innovation in the market for highly sophisticated medical equipment.
New and improved medical equipment can be introduced that could make the Gamma Knife technology
obsolete and that would make it uneconomical to operate. During 2000, Elekta introduced an
upgraded Gamma Knife which costs approximately $3.6 million plus applicable tax and duties. This
upgrade includes an Automatic Positioning System (APS), and therefore involves less health care
provider intervention. In early 2005, Elekta introduced a new upgrade, the model 4C. Twelve of
our existing Gamma Knife units include APS and eight of our existing Gamma Knife units are
upgradeable. The cost to upgrade existing units to the new model 4C Gamma Knife with APS is
estimated to be approximately $200,000 to $1,000,000, depending on the current Gamma Knife
configuration. The failure to acquire or use new technology and products could have a material
adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Our Contract With Elekta May Limit Our Activities
ASHS owns 81% of GKF and the minority interest is owned by Elekta. The operating agreement
governing GKF contains restrictions on our ability to engage in financing
13
Table of Contents
...alternative stereotactic radiosurgery equipment to the Gamma Knife. In the past, we and Elekta
have had different interpretations of the scope of this restriction in the operating agreement. If
Elektas position were to prevail, this provision may limit the activities that ASHS undertakes in
the future.
ITEM 2.
PROPERTIES
The Companys corporate offices are located at Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3700, San Francisco,
California, where it subleases approximately 4,100 square feet for $24,258 per month. This
sublease runs through May 2006. A portion of the office space is subleased through May 2006 to two
third parties for approximately $2,000 per month. The Company anticipates that it will remain in
its current office space through a new direct lease upon the expiration of its current sublease.
For the year ended December 31, 2005 the Companys aggregate net rental expenses for all properties
and equipment were approximately $386,000.
ITEM 3.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
There are no material pending legal proceedings involving the Company or any of its property. The
Company knows of no legal or administrative proceedings against the Company contemplated by
governmental authorities.
ITEM 4.
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
No matter was submitted to a vote of the Companys security holders through the solicitation of
proxies or otherwise during the fourth quarter of 2005.
PART II
ITEM 5.
MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES
The Companys common shares, no par value (the Common Shares), are currently traded on the
American Stock Exchange and the Pacific Exchange. The table below sets forth the high and low
closing sale prices of the Common Shares of the Company on the American Stock Exchange Consolidated
Reporting System for each full quarter for the last two fiscal years.
14
Table of Contents
Prices for Common Shares | ||||||||
Quarter Ending | High | Low | ||||||
March 31, 2004 |
$ | 7.79 | $ | 5.55 | ||||
June 30, 2004 |
$ | 7.24 | $ | 5.35 | ||||
September 30, 2004 |
$ | 5.62 | $ | 4.25 | ||||
December 31, 2004 |
$ | 6.15 | $ | 4.70 | ||||
March 31, 2005 |
$ | 6.23 | $ | 5.40 | ||||
June 30, 2005 |
$ | 6.28 | $ | 5.23 | ||||
September 30, 2005 |
$ | 6.17 | $ | 5.71 | ||||
December 31, 2005 |
$ | 7.35 | $ | 5.80 |
The Company estimates that there were approximately 2,500 beneficial holders of its Common Shares
at December 31, 2005.
The Board of Directors authorized in March 1999 the repurchase of up to 500,000 shares of the
Companys Common Stock in the open market from time to time at prevailing prices. Approximately
484,000 shares have been repurchased in the open market pursuant to that authorization at a cost of
approximately $1,213,000, although no shares have been repurchased in the open market since 2001.
The Board of Directors on February 2, 2001 authorized the repurchase of up to another 500,000
shares of the Companys common stock in the open market from time to time at prevailing prices. No
shares have been repurchased under this additional authorization.
During 2005 holders of options to acquire the Companys common stock exercised their respective
rights pursuant to such securities, resulting in the Company issuing 243,000 new shares of common
stock for approximately $68,000.
On March 22, 1999 the Company adopted a Shareholder Rights Plan (Plan). Under the Plan, the
Company made a dividend distribution of one Right for each outstanding share of the Companys
common stock as of the close of business on April 1, 1999. The Rights become exercisable only if
any person or group, with certain exceptions, becomes an acquiring person (acquires 15 percent or
more of the Companys outstanding common stock) or announces a tender or exchange offer to acquire
15 percent or more of the Companys outstanding common stock. The Companys Board of Directors
adopted the Plan to protect shareholders against a coercive or inadequate takeover offer. The
Board of Directors is not aware that any person or group intends to make a takeover offer for the
Company.
At December 31, 2005 the Company had 5,018,885 issued and outstanding common shares, 396,530 common
shares reserved for options, and 5,165 shares reserved pursuant to the Companys Shareholder Rights
Plan.
15
Table of Contents
In fourth quarter 2005, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $.0475 per common
share to shareholders of record on January 3, 2006, paid on January 18, 2006. During 2005,
shareholders of record as of January 3, 2005, April 4, 2005, July 1, 2005 and October 3, 2005 were
paid quarterly dividends respectively as follows: $0.045 on January 14, 2005 and April 15, 2005,
and $0.0475 on July 15, 2005 and October 17, 2005. During 2004, shareholders of record as of
January 2, 2004, April 2, 2004, July 2, 2004 and October 1, 2004 were paid quarterly dividends
respectively as follows: $0.04 on January 15, 2004 and April 16, 2004, $0.0425 on July 15, 2004
and $0.045 on October 15, 2004. The Board of Directors anticipates declaring and paying quarterly
cash dividends in similar amounts in the future subject to evaluation of the Companys level of
earnings, balance sheet position and availability of cash. The Company did not pay cash dividends
prior to 2001.
ITEM 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Summary of Operations
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||||||
Medical services revenue |
$ | 18,231 | $ | 16,389 | $ | 16,178 | $ | 13,366 | $ | 11,758 | ||||||||||
Costs of operations |
9,072 | 7,887 | 7,400 | 5,399 | 4,285 | |||||||||||||||
Selling and administrative expense |
3,613 | 2,963 | 3,255 | 3,313 | 3,245 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
2,075 | 2,261 | 2,547 | 2,437 | 2,456 | |||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
14,760 | 13,111 | 13,202 | 11,149 | 9,986 | |||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
3,471 | 3,278 | 2,976 | 2,217 | 1,772 | |||||||||||||||
Interest and other income |
202 | 102 | 121 | 171 | 480 | |||||||||||||||
Minority interest expense |
(1,126 | ) | (983 | ) | (928 | ) | (831 | ) | (751 | ) | ||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
2,547 | 2,397 | 2,169 | 1,557 | 1,501 | |||||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
(780 | ) | (412 | ) | (787 | ) | (455 | ) | (433 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,767 | $ | 1,985 | $ | 1,382 | $ | 1,102 | $ | 1,068 | ||||||||||
Net income per common share: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.36 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.30 | ||||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.35 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.21 | ||||||||||
Cash dividend declared per common share |
$ | 0.1875 | $ | 0.1725 | $ | 0.2000 | $ | 0.1200 | $ | 0.1000 | ||||||||||
Dividend payout ratio (paid and declared) |
0.54 | 0.44 | 0.74 | 0.55 | 0.48 |
See accompanying note
16
Table of Contents
Balance Sheet Data
As of December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Amounts in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||||||
Cash & cash equivalents |
$ | 1,298 | $ | 8,121 | $ | 10,312 | $ | 9,924 | $ | 11,580 | ||||||||||
Securities- current |
4,537 | 957 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Restricted cash |
50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | |||||||||||||||
Working capital |
2,423 | 4,978 | 5,268 | 7,175 | 9,351 | |||||||||||||||
Securities- long-term |
2,797 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
48,668 | 47,367 | 46,304 | 44,830 | 42,385 | |||||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt/capital leases |
6,377 | 6,562 | 6,803 | 5,490 | 4,305 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt/capital leases, less current portion |
18,705 | 18,924 | 20,114 | 22,006 | 21,615 | |||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
$ | 18,320 | $ | 17,546 | $ | 15,329 | $ | 14,540 | $ | 13,785 |
See accompanying note
(1) | In October 1995, the Company entered into an operating agreement granting to American Shared Radiosurgery Services (a California corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company) an 81% ownership interest in GK Financing, LLC. ASHS incorporated a new wholly-owned subsidiary, OR21, Inc. (OR21) in November 1999, and a new wholly-owned subsidiary, MedLeader.com, Inc. (MedLeader) in April 2000. Accordingly, the financial data for the Company presented above include the results of GKF, OR21 and MedLeader for 2001 through 2005. |
This financial data as of December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and for the years ended December 31,
2003, 2004 and 2005 should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and
the notes thereto beginning on page A-1 of this report and with Item 7Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Companys consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles and follow general practices within the industry in which it operates.
Application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments
that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These
estimates, assumptions and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the
financial statements; accordingly, as this information changes, the financial statements could
reflect different estimates, assumptions and judgments. Certain policies inherently have a greater
reliance on the use of estimates, assumptions and judgments and as such have a greater possibility
of producing results that could be materially different than originally reported. Estimates,
assumptions and judgments are necessary when assets and liabilities are required to be recorded at
fair value, when a decline in the value of an asset not
carried on the financial statements at fair value warrants an impairment write-down or valuation
17
Table of Contents
reserve to be established, or when an asset or liability needs to be recorded contingent upon a
future event. Carrying assets and liabilities at fair value inherently results in more financial
statement volatility. The fair values and the information used to record valuation adjustments for
certain assets and liabilities are based either on quoted market prices or are provided by other
third-party sources when available. When third-party information is not available, valuation
adjustments are estimated in good faith by management primarily through the use of internal cash
flow modeling techniques.
The most significant accounting policies followed by the Company are presented in Note 2 to the
consolidated financial statements. These policies along with the disclosures presented in the
other financial statement notes and in this financial review, provide information on how
significant assets and liabilities are valued in the financial statements and how those values are
determined. Based on the valuation techniques used and the sensitivity of financial statement
amounts to the methods, assumptions and estimates underlying those amounts, management has
identified the determination of the allowance for doubtful accounts and revenue recognition to be
two areas that required the most subjective or complex judgments, and as such could be most subject
to revision as new information becomes available. The following are our critical accounting
policies in which managements estimates, assumptions and judgments most directly and materially
affect the financial statements:
Revenue Recognition
The Company has only one revenue-generating activity, which is the operation of Gamma Knife units
by GK Financing, LLC (GKF), an 81% owned subsidiary of the Company.
Revenue is recognized when services have been rendered and collectibility is reasonably assured, on
either a fee per use or revenue sharing basis. The Company has contracts with 15 fee per use
hospitals and six retail hospitals. Under both of these types of agreements, the hospital is
responsible for billing patients and collection of fees for services performed. Revenue associated
with installation of the Gamma Knife units, if any, is a part of the negotiated lease amount and
not a distinctly identifiable amount. The costs, if any, associated with installation of the units
are amortized over the period of the related lease to match revenue recognition of these costs.
For fee per use agreements, revenue is not estimated because these contracts provide for a fixed
fee per procedure, and are typically for a ten year term. Revenue is recognized at the time the
procedures are performed, based on each hospitals contracted rate. There is no guaranteed minimum
payment. Costs related to operating the units are charged to costs of operations as incurred,
which approximates the recognition of the related revenue. Revenues under fee per use agreements
are recorded on a gross basis.
GKF has six agreements that are based on revenue sharing. These can be further classified as
either turn-key arrangements or net revenue sharing arrangements. For the four turn-key sites,
GKF is solely responsible for the costs to acquire and install the Gamma Knife. In return, GKF
receives payment from the hospital in the amount of its reimbursement from third party payors.
Revenue is recognized by the Company during the period in which the procedure is performed, and is
estimated based on what can be reasonably expected to be paid by the third
party payor to the hospital. The estimate is primarily determined from historical experience and
18
Table of Contents
hospital contracts with third party payors. These estimates are reviewed on a regular basis and
adjusted as necessary to more accurately reflect the expected payment amount. The Company also
records an estimate of operating costs associated with each procedure during the period in which
the procedure is performed. Costs are determined primarily based on historical treatment protocols
and cost schedules with the hospital. The Companys estimated operating costs are reviewed on a
regular basis and adjusted as necessary to more accurately reflect the actual operating costs.
Revenue for turn-key sites is recorded on a gross basis, and the operating expenses the Company
reimburses to the hospital are recorded in other operating costs.
Under net revenue sharing arrangements the hospital shares in the responsibility and risk with GKF
for the capital investment to acquire and install the Gamma Knife. Unlike our turn-key
arrangement, GKFs lease payment under a net revenue sharing arrangement is a percentage of revenue
less operating costs. Payments are made by the hospital, generally on a monthly basis, to GKF
based on an agreed upon percentage allocation of income remaining after all operating expenses are
deducted from cash collected. Revenue is recognized during the period in which the procedure is
performed, and is determined based on the net reimbursement amount that GKF expects to receive from
the hospital for each Gamma Knife procedure. Under the net revenue sharing arrangement, the
percent of revenue received by GKF is recorded net of costs to provide a Gamma Knife treatment.
This estimate is reviewed on a regular basis and adjusted as necessary to more accurately reflect
the expected payment amount.
Revenue from retail arrangements amounted to approximately 29%, 25% and 24% of revenue for the
years ended December 31 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated based on possible losses relating to the Companys
revenue sharing customers. The Company receives reimbursement from the customer based on the
customers collections from individuals and third-party payors such as insurance companies and
Medicare. Receivables are charged against the allowance in the period that they are deemed
uncollectible.
If the Companys net accounts receivable estimates for revenue sharing customers as of December 31,
2005 changed by as much as 10% based on actual collection information, it would have the effect of
increasing or decreasing revenue by approximately $252,000.
GENERAL
During the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, 100% of the Companys revenue was derived
from its Gamma Knife business.
TOTAL REVENUE
19
Table of Contents
Increase | Increase | |||||||||||||||||||
2005 | (Decrease) | 2004 | (Decrease) | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
Medical services
revenue (in
thousands) |
$ | 18,231 | 11.2 | % | $ | 16,389 | 1.3 | % | $ | 16,178 | ||||||||||
Number of Gamma
Knife procedures |
2,410 | 12.6 | % | 2,140 | 1.1 | % | 2,116 | |||||||||||||
Average revenue per
procedure |
$ | 7,565 | (1.2 | )% | $ | 7,658 | 0.2 | % | $ | 7,646 |
Medical services revenue increased 11.2% in 2005 compared to 2004 and increased 1.3% in 2004
compared to 2003. The increase in both 2005 and 2004 is due to an increase in the number of Gamma
Knife units in operation. The Company had twenty-one, eighteen and seventeen Gamma Knife units in
operation at December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Gamma Knife revenue increased $1,842,000 and $211,000 in 2005 and 2004, respectively, compared to
the prior years. The 2005 increase was due to three new Gamma Knife units that began operation
during 2005 and the full year inclusion of one new Gamma Knife unit that began operation during
2004, which offset a 4% decrease in revenue from Gamma Knife units in operation more than one year.
The 2004 increase compared to 2003 was primarily due to one new Gamma Knife units that began
operation during 2004 and the full year inclusion of three new Gamma Knife units that began
operation during 2003, which offset a 14% decrease in revenue for Gamma Knife units in operation
more than one year.
The number of Gamma Knife procedures in 2005 increased by 270 compared to 2004 due to the increase
in the number of Gamma Knife units in operation, as well as a 3% increase in procedures from Gamma
Knife units in operation more than one year. The increase in the number of Gamma Knife procedures
in 2004 compared to 2003 was due to the increase in the number of Gamma Knife units in operation,
which offset a 10% decrease in procedures from Gamma Knife units in operation more than one year.
Revenue per procedure decreased $93 in 2005 and increased $12 in 2004 compared to the prior years.
The Companys contracts generally have different procedure rates because their investment basis
varies, so revenue per procedure can vary year to year depending primarily on the mix of procedures
performed at certain locations. The decrease per procedure in 2005 is primarily due to lower
average procedure rates collected at two of the Companys retail sites.
COSTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands) | 2005 | Increase | 2004 | Increase | 2003 | |||||||||||||||
Costs of operations |
$ | 9,072 | 15.0 | % | $ | 7,887 | 6.6 | % | $ | 7,400 | ||||||||||
Percentage of revenue |
49.8 | % | 48.1 | % | 45.7 | % |
The Companys costs of operations, consisting of maintenance and supplies, depreciation and
amortization, and other operating expenses (such as insurance, property taxes, sales taxes,
marketing costs and other fees) increased $1,185,000 in 2005 compared to 2004, and increased
$487,000 in 2004 compared to 2003.
20
Table of Contents
The Companys maintenance and supplies costs were 6%, 5% and 5% of medical service revenue in 2005,
2004 and 2003, respectively. Maintenance and supplies costs increased $150,000 in 2005 compared to
2004, and increased $139,000 in 2004 compared to 2003. The increase in 2005 compared to 2004 was
primarily due to the expiration of the warranty period on one Gamma Knife unit and the full year
inclusion of maintenance on two Gamma Knife units whose warranty period expired during the previous
year. The increase in 2004 compared to 2003 was primarily due to the expiration of the warranty
period on two Gamma Knife units and the full year inclusion of three Gamma Knife units whose
warranty period expired during 2003.
Depreciation and amortization increased $593,000 in 2005 compared to 2004, and increased $577,000
in 2004 compared to 2003. The increase in 2005 was primarily due to the addition of three new
Gamma Knife units that commenced operation during first, second and third quarters of 2005 and a
full year of depreciation on one new Gamma Knife units that started operation during 2004. The
increase in 2004 was due to the addition of one new Gamma Knife unit that commenced operation
during third quarter 2004 and a full years depreciation on three Gamma Knife units that started
operation in 2003.
Other direct operating costs as a percentage of medical services revenue were 14%, 13% and 15% in
2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase of $442,000 in 2005 compared to 2004 was primarily
due to increased operating costs related to the Companys two additional retail Gamma Knife units
that started operation during 2005 and higher insurance costs due to additional Gamma Knife units
in operation, which were partially offset by lower marketing and promotion costs. The decrease of
$229,000 in 2004 compared to 2003 was primarily due to lower operating costs related to a lower
number of procedures performed at one of the Companys retail locations.
SELLING AND ADMINISTRATIVE
(In thousands) | 2005 | Increase | 2004 | (Decrease) | 2003 | |||||||||||||||
Selling and administrative costs |
$ | 3,613 | 21.9 | % | $ | 2,963 | (9.0 | )% | $ | 3,255 | ||||||||||
Percentage of revenue |
19.8 | % | 18.1 | % | 20.1 | % |
The Companys selling and administrative costs increased $650,000 in 2005 compared to 2004, and
decreased $292,000 in 2004 compared to 2003. The increase in 2005 compared to 2004 was primarily
due to increased payroll and business development costs of approximately $441,000, which included
costs of the Companys second Gamma Knife Users Meeting of approximately $42,000 and OR21 business
development costs of approximately $151,000. In addition, legal, accounting and consulting fees
increased approximately $119,000 and contributions increased approximately $55,000 over the prior
year. The decrease in 2004 was primarily due to lower payroll and business development costs of
approximately $142,000, recruiting fees of $42,000 and insurance of $26,000. Also, during 2003
there was a non-recurring write-off of approximately $58,000 in previously deferred costs relating
to the future placement of a Gamma Knife unit in Brazil, and the Companys Gamma Knife Users
Meeting of approximately $45,000.
21
Table of Contents
INTEREST EXPENSE
Increase | Increase | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2005 | (Decrease) | 2004 | (Decrease) | 2003 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
$ | 2,075 | (8.2 | )% | $ | 2,261 | (11.2 | )% | $ | 2,547 | ||||||||||
Percentage of revenue |
11.4 | % | 13.8 | % | 15.7 | % |
The Companys interest expense decreased $186,000 in 2005 compared to 2004, and decreased $286,000
in 2004 compared to 2003. The decrease in 2005 was due to lower interest expense on the Companys
more mature Gamma Knife units and the completion of debt service on two Gamma Knife units. This
was partially offset by additional interest expense on the financing of the Companys three new
Gamma Knife units that started operation during 2005, and the refinancing of one Gamma Knife unit
that had previously been paid off. The decrease in 2004 was primarily due to lower interest
expense on the Companys more mature Gamma Knife units and final payment on the debt for one Gamma
Knife unit. This decrease was partially offset by additional interest expense on the financing of
the Companys new Gamma Knife unit in 2004. Fourteen of the Companys twenty-one Gamma Knife units
have been in operation for more than three years and generally have significantly lower interest
expense than newer units because interest expense decreases with each principal payment.
OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSE
Increase | Increase | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2005 | (Decrease) | 2004 | (Decrease) | 2003 | |||||||||||||||
Interest and other income |
$ | 202 | 98.0 | % | $ | 102 | (15.7 | )% | $ | 121 | ||||||||||
Percentage of revenue |
1.1 | % | 0.6 | % | 0.7 | % | ||||||||||||||
Minority interest expense |
$ | (1,126 | ) | 14.5 | % | $ | (983 | ) | 5.9 | % | $ | (928 | ) | |||||||
Percentage of revenue |
(6.2 | )% | (6.0 | )% | (5.7 | )% |
Interest and other income increased $100,000 in 2005 compared to 2004 and decreased $19,000 in 2004
compared to 2003. The increase in 2005 was primarily due to investment in longer term holdings
with higher interest rates available compared to 2004. The decrease in 2004 was primarily due to
lower invested cash balances during 2004.
Minority interest increased $143,000 in 2005 and $55,000 in 2004 compared to the prior year,
respectively. Minority interest represents the pre-tax income earned by the minority partners 19%
interest in GKF. The increase in minority interest reflects the increased profitability of GKF.
INCOME TAXES
22
Table of Contents
Increase | Increase | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2005 | (Decrease) | 2004 | (Decrease) | 2003 | |||||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
$ | 780 | 89.3 | % | $ | 412 | (47.6 | %) | $ | 787 | ||||||||||
Percentage of revenue |
4.3 | % | 2.5 | % | 4.9 | % |
Income tax expense increased $368,000 in 2005 compared to 2004, and decreased $375,000 in 2004
compared to 2003. The Companys estimated 37% effective income tax provision for 2005 was reduced
by a $193,000 income tax benefit from the exercise of options to purchase 264,000 common shares.
The Companys 40% income tax provision for 2004 was reduced by a $547,000 income tax benefit from
the exercise of options to purchase 846,000 common shares. The income tax benefit is a result of
compensation expense that was recognized when these options for common shares were granted in 1995.
The Company anticipates that it will continue to record income tax expense if it operates
profitably in the future. Currently there are minimal income tax payments required due to net
operating loss carryforwards and other deferred tax assets available for tax purposes.
The Company had a net operating loss carryforward for federal income tax return purposes at
December 31, 2005 of approximately $12,556,000.
NET INCOME
(In thousands, | Increase | Increase | ||||||||||||||||||
except per share amounts) | 2005 | (Decrease) | 2004 | (Decrease) | 2003 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,767 | (11.0 | )% | $ | 1,985 | 43.6 | % | $ | 1,382 | ||||||||||
Net income per share,
diluted |
$ | 0.35 | (10.3 | )% | $ | 0.39 | 44.4 | % | $ | 0.27 |
The Company had net income of $1,767,000 in 2005 compared to $1,985,000 in 2004 and $1,382,000 in
2003. Net income for 2005 included increased operating income of $193,000 compared to 2004, which
was primarily due to the addition of three new Gamma Knife units during 2005. This was offset by
an increase in income tax expense of $368,000 due to reduced income tax benefits available on the
exercise of options to purchase common stock. Net income for 2004 included increased income from
operations compared to 2003 of $302,000 which was primarily due to lower selling and administrative
costs and interest expense. In addition, income tax expense was $375,000 less than 2003 due to an
income tax benefit of $547,000 on the exercise of options to purchase common stock.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company had cash and cash equivalents of $1,298,000 at December 31, 2005 compared to $8,121,000
at December 31, 2004. This decrease in cash resulted primarily from the Companys
decision during 2005 to invest an additional $6,377,000 of its available cash into marketable
23
Table of Contents
securities. The Companys expected primary cash needs on both a short and long-term basis are for
capital expenditures, business expansion, working capital, payment of quarterly dividends and other
general corporate purposes.
Securities represents a portion of the Companys cash that is invested in high-quality short to
long-term fixed income marketable securities in order to maximize income on its available cash.
Securities with maturity dates between three and twelve months in the amount of $4,537,000 are
classified as current assets. Securities in the amount of $2,797,000 have maturities in excess of
one year and are classified as long-term. It is the Companys intent to hold these securities
until maturity.
Restricted cash of $50,000 at December 31, 2005 reflects cash that may only be used for the
operations of GKF.
Operating activities provided cash of $8,480,000 in 2005. Net income of $1,767,000, depreciation
and amortization of $5,502,000 and an increase in the minority interest of $1,126,000 were the
primary reasons for the increase in operating cash flow. The Companys trade accounts receivable
increased to $3,832,000 at December 31, 2005 from $2,793,000 at December 31, 2004, which was
primarily due to the addition of three new Gamma Knife contracts during 2005, two of which were
retail contracts, and an increase in the number of days revenue outstanding (DSO) in accounts
receivable for some of the Gamma Knife contracts. The DSO was 76 and 66 days as of December 31,
2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. We expect DSO to fluctuate in the future depending on
timing of customer payments received and the mix of fee per use vs. retail customers.
Investing activities used $12,572,000 of cash in 2005 primarily due to an investment in short to
long-term securities of $7,334,000 and for the acquisition of property and equipment of $6,195,000,
primarily for the three Gamma Knife units that became operational during 2005.
Financing activities used $2,731,000 of cash during 2005, primarily due to principal payments on
long-term debt of $7,419,000, distributions to minority owners of $912,000 and the payment of
dividends of $902,000. This was partially offset by financing on the acquisition of property and
equipment of $7,015,000, primarily for the three Gamma Knife units that became operational during
2005.
Working capital decreased $2,555,000 to $2,423,000 at December 31, 2005 from $4,978,000 at December
31, 2004 primarily due to a decrease in cash and current securities of $3,243,000 which was
partially offset by an increase in trade accounts receivable of $1,039,000.
The Company primarily invests its cash in money market or similar funds and high quality short to
long-term securities in order to minimize the potential for principal erosion. Cash is invested in
these funds pending use in the Companys operations. The Company believes its cash position
combined with its working capital is adequate to service the Companys cash requirements in 2006.
24
Table of Contents
The Company finances all of its Gamma Knife units, and anticipates that it will continue to do so
with future contracts. During 2003 the Companys primary lender, DVI, filed for Chapter 11
bankruptcy protection. The principal balance of notes held by DVI were transferred to a third
party lender as successor servicer, and the Company continues to make payments on the outstanding
note balances serviced by this third party lender. The Company has secured financing for its
recent projects from other lenders and anticipates that it will be able to secure financing on
future projects from these or other lending sources, but there can be no assurance that financing
will continue to be available on acceptable terms. The Company meets all debt covenants required
under notes with its lenders, and expects that any covenants required by future lenders will be
acceptable to the Company.
IMPACT OF INFLATION AND CHANGING PRICES
The Company does not believe that inflation has had a significant impact on operations because a
substantial majority of the costs that it incurs under its customer contracts are fixed through the
term of the contract.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS, COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENT LIABLILITES AND OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The following table presents, as of December 31, 2005, the Corporations significant fixed and
determinable contractual obligations by payment date. The payment amounts represent those amounts
contractually due to the recipient and do not include any unamortized premiums or discounts, hedge
basis adjustments, or other similar carrying value adjustments. Further discussion of the nature
of each obligation is included in the referenced note to the consolidated financial statements.
Payments Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total amounts | Less than | |||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations | committed | 1 year | 1-3 years | 4-5 years | After 5 years | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
$ | 20,884,000 | $ | 5,631,000 | $ | 12,619,000 | $ | 2,634,000 | ||||||||||||
Capital leases |
4,198,000 | 746,000 | 2,331,000 | 1,013,000 | 108,000 | |||||||||||||||
Future Gamma Knife purchases (1) |
2,109,000 | 2,109,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating leases |
235,000 | 208,000 | 27,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Total contractual obligations |
$ | 27,426,000 | $ | 6,585,000 | $ | 17,086,000 | $ | 3,647,000 | $ | 108,000 | ||||||||||
(1) | The Company has deposits toward the upgrade and reload of certain Gamma Knife units already in service. The term financing for these upgrades will not be finalized until 2006, and therefore an accurate determination of payments by period cannot be made as of December 31, 2005. For purposes of this table, these commitments are listed in the 1-3 year category. |
Further discussion of the long-term debt commitment is included in Note 4, capital leases in
Note 9, and operating leases in Note 10 of the consolidated financial statements.
The Company has no significant off-balance sheet arrangements.
25
Table of Contents
ITEM 7a.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The table below presents information about certain market-sensitive financial instruments as of
December 31, 2005. The fair values were determined based on quoted market prices for the same or
similar instruments.
We do not hold or issue derivative instruments for trading purposes and are not a party to any
instruments with leverage or prepayment features.
Maturity Date, Year ending December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(amounts in thousands) | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | Thereafter | Total | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed-rate long-term debt
and present value of
capital leases |
$ | 6,377 | $ | 5,674 | $ | 4,732 | $ | 4,544 | $ | 2,477 | $ | 1,278 | $ | 25,082 | $ | 25,088 | ||||||||||||||||
Average interest rates |
8.6 | % | 8.4 | % | 8.2 | % | 8.1 | % | 7.9 | % | 7.8 | % | 8.3 | % |
At December 31, 2005, we had no significant long-term, market-sensitive investments.
We have no affiliation with partnerships, trust or other entities whose purpose is to facilitate
off-balance sheet financial transactions or similar arrangements, and therefore have no exposure to
the financing, liquidity, market or credit risks associated with such entities.
ITEM 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
See the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules included at
page A-1 of this report.
ITEM 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9a.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) | Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. | |
Our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in |
26
Table of Contents
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of December 31, 2005 (the Evaluation Date), have concluded that as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures (as required by paragraph (b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15) were adequate and designed to ensure that material information relating to us and our consolidated subsidiaries would be made known to them by others within those entities. |
(b) | Changes in internal controls over financial reporting. | |
There were no significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. |
ITEM 9b.
OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10.
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
Information regarding directors is incorporated herein by reference from the Companys definitive
Proxy Statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the 2006 Proxy Statement).
Information regarding executive officers of the Company, included herein under the caption
Executive Officers of the Registrant in Part I, Item 1 above, is incorporated herein by
reference.
Information concerning the identification of our standing audit committee required by this Item is
incorporated by reference from the 2006 Proxy Statement.
Information concerning our audit committee financial experts required by this Item is incorporated
by reference from the 2006 Proxy Statement.
Information concerning compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act required by this Item is
incorporated by reference from the 2006 Proxy Statement.
We have adopted a Code of Ethics that is incorporated by reference from the 2006 Proxy Statement.
27
Table of Contents
ITEM 11.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Incorporated herein by reference from the 2006 Proxy Statement.
ITEM 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Incorporated herein by reference from the 2006 Proxy Statement.
ITEM 13.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
Incorporated herein by reference from the 2006 Proxy Statement.
ITEM 14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Incorporated herein by reference from the 2006 Proxy Statement.
PART IV
ITEM 15.
EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) | Financial Statements and Schedules. | |
The following Financial Statements and Schedules are filed with this Report: |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Income
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Financial Statement Schedules
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
28
Table of Contents
(All other schedules are omitted since the required information is not
present or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the
schedule, or because the information required is included in the financial
statements and notes thereto.)
(b) | Exhibits. | |
The following Exhibits are filed with this Report. |
Exhibit | ||
Number: | Description: | |
2.1
|
Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 12, 1999, by and among Alliance Imaging, Inc.; Embarcadero Holding Corp. I; Embarcadero Holding Corp. II; American Shared Hospital Services; and MMRI, Inc. (1) | |
3.1
|
Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as amended. (2) | |
3.2
|
By-laws of the Company, as amended. (3) | |
4.6
|
Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant of American Shared Hospital Services. (3) | |
4.8
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May 17, 1995, by and among American Shared Hospital Services, the Holders referred to in the Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 12, 1995 and General Electric Company, acting through GE Medical Systems. (3) | |
4.9
|
Rights Agreement dated as of March 22, 1999 between American Shared Hospital Services and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company as Rights Agent. (25) | |
10.1
|
The Companys 1984 Stock Option Plan, as amended. (4) | |
10.2
|
The Companys 1995 Stock Option Plan, as amended. (5) | |
10.3
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between American Shared Hospital Services and members of its Board of Directors. (4) | |
10.4
|
Ernest A. Bates Stock Option Agreement dated as of August 15, 1995. (6) | |
10.5
|
Operating Agreement for GK Financing, LLC, dated as of October 17, 1995. (3) |
29
Table of Contents
Exhibit | ||
Number: | Description: | |
10.6
|
Amendments dated as of October 26, 1995 and as of December 20, 1995 to the GK Financing, LLC Operating Agreement, dated as of October 17, 1995. (7) | |
10.7
|
Amendment dated as of October 16, 1996 to the GK Financing, LLC Operating Agreement, dated as of October 17, 1995. (1) | |
10.8
|
Amendment dated as of March 31, 1999 (Fourth Amendment) to the GK Financing, LLC Operating Agreement dated as of October 17, 1995. (8) | |
10.9
|
Amendment dated as of March 31, 1999 (Fifth Amendment) to the GK Financing, LLC Operating Agreement dated as of October 17, 1995. (8) | |
10.10
|
Amendment dated as of June 5, 1999 to the GK Financing, LLC Operating Agreement dated as of October 17, 1995. (8) | |
10.11a
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated as of December 31, 1995, between American Shared Radiosurgery Services (assignor) and GK Financing, LLC (assignee). (8) | |
10.11b
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated as of November 1, 1995, between American Shared Hospital Services (assignor) and American Shared Radiosurgery Services (assignee). (4) | |
10.11c
|
Amendment Number One dated as of August 1, 1995 to the Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit between The Regents of the University of California and American Shared Hospital Services. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (8) | |
10.11d
|
Lease Agreement dated as of July 3, 1990 for a Gamma Knife Unit between American Shared Hospital Services and The Regents of the University of California. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (8) | |
10.12
|
Amendment Number Two dated as of February 6, 1999 to the Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit between UCSF-Stanford Health Care and GK Financing, LLC. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under |
30
Table of Contents
Exhibit | ||
Number: | Description: | |
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (8) | ||
10.13
|
Assignment and Assumption Agreement, dated as of February 3, 1996, between American Shared Radiosurgery Services (assignor) and GK Financing, LLC (assignee). (4) | |
10.14
|
Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of April 6, 1994, between Ernest A. Bates, M.D. and NME Hospitals, Inc. dba USC University Hospital. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (8) | |
10.15
|
Assignment and Assumption and Agreement dated as of February 1, 1996 between Ernest A. Bates, M.D. and GK Financing, LLC with respect to the Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife dated as of April 6, 1994 between Ernest A. Bates, M.D. and NME Hospitals, Inc. dba USC University Hospital. (8) | |
10.16
|
Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of October 31, 1996 between Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian and GK Financing, LLC. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (8) | |
10.17
|
Addendum to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of December 1, 1999 between Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian and GK Financing, LLC. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (8) | |
10.18
|
Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of October 29, 1996 between Methodist Healthcare Systems of San Antonio, Ltd., dba Southwest Texas Methodist Hospital and GK Financing, LLC. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (8) |
31
Table of Contents
Exhibit | ||
Number: | Description: | |
10.18a
|
Amendment to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit effective December 13, 2003 by and between Methodist Healthcare Systems of San Antonio, Ltd., dba Southwest Texas Methodist Hospital and GK Financing, LLC. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (22) | |
10.19
|
Lease agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of April 10, 1997 between Yale-New Haven Ambulatory Services Corporation and GK Financing, LLC. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (8) | |
10.20
|
Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of June 1, 1999 between GK Financing, LLC and Kettering Medical Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (9) | |
10.21
|
Addendum to Contract with GKF and KMC/WKNI, dated June 1, 1999 between GK Financing, LLC and Kettering Medical Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (9) | |
10.22
|
Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of October 5, 1999 between GK Financing, LLC and New England Medical Center Hospitals, Inc. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (9) | |
10.22a
|
Addendum to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife unit effective April 1, 2005 between GK Financing, LLC and New England Medical Center Hospitals, Inc. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (24) |
32
Table of Contents
Exhibit | ||
Number: | Description: | |
10.23
|
Equipment Lease Agreement dated as of October 29, 1999 between GK Financing, LLC and the Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas on behalf of The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (9) | |
10.23a
|
Amendment to Lease Agreement effective as of September 15, 2005 between GK Financing, LLC and the Board of Trustees of the University of Arkansas on behalf of The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) | |
10.24
|
First Amendment to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit effective as of August 2, 2000 between GK Financing, LLC and Tenet HealthSystems Hospitals, Inc. (formerly known as NME Hospitals, Inc.) dba USC University Hospital. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (9) | |
10.25
|
Addendum Two, dated as of October 1, 2000, to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of October 31, 1996 between Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian and GK Financing, LLC. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (10) | |
10.26
|
Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of May 28, 2000 between Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital and GK Financing, LLC. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (10) |
33
Table of Contents
Exhibit | ||
Number: | Description: | |
10.27
|
Addendum dated June 24, 2000 to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of May 28, 2000 between Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital and GK Financing, LLC. (10) | |
10.28
|
Amendment dated July 12, 2000 to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated May 28, 2000 between Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital and GK Financing, LLC. (10) | |
10.29
|
Amendment dated August 24, 2000 to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated May 28, 2000 between Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital and GK Financing, LLC. (10) | |
10.30
|
Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of December 11, 1996 between The Community Hospital Group, Inc. dba JFK Medical Center and GK Financing, LLC. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (11) | |
10.31
|
Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of June 3, 1999 between GK Financing, LLC and Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center, LLC dba Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (12) | |
10.32
|
Addendum to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of June 3, 1999 between GK Financing, LLC and Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center, LLC dba Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (12) | |
10.33
|
Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of November 1, 1999 between GK Financing, LLC and Jackson HMA, Inc. dba Central Mississippi Medical Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (13) |
34
Table of Contents
Exhibit | ||
Number: | Description: | |
10.34
|
Addendum to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of November 1, 1999 between GK Financing, LLC and Jackson HMA, Inc. dba Central Mississippi Medical Center. (13) | |
10.35
|
Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of February 18, 2000 between GK Financing, LLC and OSF HealthCare System. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (13) | |
10.36
|
American Shared Hospital Services 2001 Stock Option Plan. (14) | |
10.37
|
Amendment Number Three to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of June 22, 2001 between GK Financing, LLC and The Regents of the University of California. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (15) | |
10.38
|
Addendum Three to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of October 1, 2000 between GK Financing, LLC and Hoag Memorial Hospital Presybterian. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (15) | |
10.39
|
Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of July 18, 2001 between GK Financing, LLC and Bayfront Medical Center, Inc.. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (16) | |
10.40
|
Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of September 13, 2001 between GK Financing, LLC and Mercy Medical Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (17) | |
10.41
|
Addendum Number One to Contract with GKF and Mercy Medical Center, dated September 13, 2001 between GK Financing, LLC and |
35
Table of Contents
Exhibit | ||
Number: | Description: | |
Mercy Medical Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (17) | ||
10.42
|
Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of May 22, 2002 between GK Financing, LLC and The Johns Hopkins Hospital. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (18) | |
10.43
|
Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of July 11, 2002 between GK Financing, LLC and Southern Baptist Hospital of Florida, Inc. D/B/A Baptist Medical Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (19) | |
10.44
|
Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of February 13, 2003 between GK Financing, LLC and AHS Albuquerque Regional Medical Center LLC. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (20) | |
10.45
|
Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of May 28, 2003 between GK Financing, LLC and Lehigh Valley Hospital. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (21) | |
10.46
|
Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of March 21, 2003 between GK Financing, LLC and Northern Westchester Hospital Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (23) |
36
Table of Contents
Exhibit | ||
Number: | Description: | |
10.47
|
Amendment Four to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit effective as of December 1, 2002 between GK Financing, LLC and Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (23) | |
10.48
|
Line of credit agreement between American Shared Hospital Services and Bank of America dated July 1, 2004 and related amendments No. 1 and No. 2 dated June 23, 2005. (23) | |
10.49
|
Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of May 28, 2004 between GK Financing, LLC and Mercy Health Center. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) (24) | |
10.50
|
Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of August 7, 2003 between GK Financing, LLC and Baptist Hospital of East Tennessee. (Confidential material appearing in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission in accordance with Rule 24b-2, promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Omitted information has been replaced with asterisks.) | |
10.50a
|
Amendment No. 1 to Lease Agreement for a Gamma Knife Unit dated as of May 28, 2004 between GK Financing, LLC and Baptist Hospital of East Tennessee. | |
21.
|
Subsidiaries of American Shared Hospital Services. | |
31.
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications. | |
32.
|
Section 1350 Certifications (furnished and not to be considered filed as part of the Form 10-K). |
(1) | These documents were filed as Exhibits 2.1 and 10.13b, respectively, to the registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, which is incorporated herein by this reference. | |
(2) | This document was filed as Exhibit 3.1 to registrants Registration Statement on Form S-2 (Registration No. 33-23416), which is incorporated herein by this reference. |
37
Table of Contents
(3) | These documents were filed as Exhibits 3.2, 4.6 and 4.8, respectively, to registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-63721) filed on October 26, 1995, which is incorporated herein by this reference. | |
(4) | These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.24 and 10.35 respectively, to registrants Registration Statement on Form S-2 (Registration No. 33-23416), which is incorporated herein by this reference. | |
(5) | This document was filed as Exhibit A to registrants Proxy Statement, filed on August 31, 1995, which is incorporated herein by this reference. | |
(6) | This document was filed as Exhibit B to registrants Proxy Statement, filed on August 31, 1995, which is incorporated herein by this reference. | |
(7) | These documents were filed as Exhibits 4.14 and 10.13, respectively, to the registrants Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 33-63721) filed on March 29, 1996, which is incorporated herein by this reference. | |
(8) | These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.8, 10.9, 10.10, 10.11a, 10.11c, 10.11d, 10.12, 10.14, 10.15, 10.16, 10.17, 10.18 and 10.19, respectively, to the registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999, which is incorporated herein by this reference. | |
(9) | These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.20, 10.21, 10.22, 10.23, and 10.24, respectively, to the registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2000, which is incorporated herein by this reference. | |
(10) | These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.25, 10.26, 10.27, 10.28 and 10.29, respectively, to the registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, which is incorporated herein by this reference. | |
(11) | This document was filed as Exhibit 10.30 to the registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2000, which is incorporated herein by this reference. | |
(12) | These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.31 and 10.32, respectively, to the registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2001, which is incorporated herein by this reference. | |
(13) | These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.33, 10.34 and 10.35, respectively, to the registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2001, which is incorporated herein by this reference. |
38
Table of Contents
(14) | This document was filed as Exhibit 10.36 to the registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2001, which is incorporated herein by this reference. | |
(15) | These documents were filed as Exhibits 10.37 and 10.38 to the registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, which is incorporated herein by this reference. | |
(16) | This document was filed as Exhibit 10.39 to the registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002, which is incorporated herein by this reference. | |
(17) | These documents were filed as Exhibit 10.40 and 10.41 to the registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002, which is incorporated herein by this reference. | |
(18) | This document was filed as Exhibit 10.42 to the registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003, which is incorporated herein by this reference. | |
(19) | This document was filed as Exhibit 10.43 to the registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, which is incorporated herein by this reference. | |
(20) | This document was filed as Exhibit 10.44 to the registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, which is incorporated herein by this reference. |
39
Table of Contents
(21) | This document was filed as Exhibit 10.45 to the registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004, which is incorporated herein by this reference. | |
(22) | This document was filed as Exhibit 10.18a to the registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005, which is incorporated herein by this reference. | |
(23) | These documents were filed as Exhibit 10.46, 10.47 and 10.48 to the registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005, which is incorporated herein by this reference. | |
(24) | These documents were filed as Exhibit 10.22a and 10.49 to the registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005, which is incorporated herein by this reference. | |
(25) | This document was filed as Exhibit 4 to the registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 1, 1999, which is incorporated herein by this reference. |
40
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES (Registrant) |
||||
March 31, 2006 | By: | Ernest A. Bates, M.D. | ||
Ernest A. Bates, M.D. | ||||
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
Signature | Title | Date | ||
Ernest A. Bates
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | March 31, 2006 | ||
Ernest R. Bates
|
Director | March 31, 2006 | ||
Olin C. Robison
|
Director | March 31, 2006 | ||
John F. Ruffle
|
Director | March 31, 2006 | ||
Stanley S. Trotman, Jr.
|
Director | March 31, 2006 | ||
Craig K. Tagawa
|
Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) | March 31, 2006 |
41
Table of Contents
AMERICAN SHARED HOSPITAL SERVICES
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
and
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
and
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
Table of Contents
Contents
PAGE | ||||
1 | ||||
2 | ||||
3 | ||||
4 | ||||
67 | ||||
822 |
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
American Shared Hospital Services
American Shared Hospital Services
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of American Shared Hospital
Services as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income,
shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2005. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board of the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its
internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purposed of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of American Shared Hospital Services at December 31, 2005 and
2004, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2005 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/S/ MOSS ADAMS LLP
San Francisco, California
March 29, 2006
March 29, 2006
1
Table of Contents
American Shared Hospital Services
Table of Contents
American Shared Hospital Services
Consolidated Balance Sheets
DECEMBER 31, | ||||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
CURRENT ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 1,298,000 | $ | 8,121,000 | ||||
Securities |
4,537,000 | 957,000 | ||||||
Restricted cash |
50,000 | 50,000 | ||||||
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $170,000 in 2005 and $170,000 in 2004 |
3,832,000 | 2,793,000 | ||||||
Other receivables |
187,000 | 157,000 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
464,000 | 594,000 | ||||||
Current deferred tax assets |
341,000 | 261,000 | ||||||
Total current assets |
10,709,000 | 12,933,000 | ||||||
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net |
34,990,000 | 34,272,000 | ||||||
SECURITIES |
2,797,000 | | ||||||
OTHER ASSETS |
172,000 | 162,000 | ||||||
$ | 48,668,000 | $ | 47,367,000 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 555,000 | $ | 282,000 | ||||
Accrued interest and other liabilities |
996,000 | 808,000 | ||||||
Employee compensation and benefits |
120,000 | 88,000 | ||||||
Accrued dividends |
238,000 | 215,000 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
5,631,000 | 6,562,000 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term capital leases |
746,000 | | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
8,286,000 | 7,955,000 | ||||||
LONG-TERM DEBT, less current portion |
15,253,000 | 18,924,000 | ||||||
LONG-TERM CAPITAL LEASES, less current portion |
3,452,000 | | ||||||
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES |
828,000 | 627,000 | ||||||
MINORITY INTEREST |
2,529,000 | 2,315,000 | ||||||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Common stock, no par value |
||||||||
Authorized 10,000,000 shares; Issued and outstanding
shares 5,019,000 in 2005 and 4,776,000 in 2004 |
9,306,000 | 9,238,000 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
4,274,000 | 4,410,000 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
4,740,000 | 3,898,000 | ||||||
Total shareholders equity |
18,320,000 | 17,546,000 | ||||||
$ | 48,668,000 | $ | 47,367,000 | |||||
See accompanying notes
2
Table of Contents
American Shared Hospital Services
Consolidated Statements of Income
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, | ||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
REVENUE: |
||||||||||||
Medical services |
$ | 18,231,000 | $ | 16,389,000 | $ | 16,178,000 | ||||||
COSTS AND EXPENSES: |
||||||||||||
Costs of revenue: |
||||||||||||
Maintenance and supplies |
1,035,000 | 885,000 | 746,000 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
5,395,000 | 4,802,000 | 4,225,000 | |||||||||
Other direct operating costs |
2,642,000 | 2,200,000 | 2,429,000 | |||||||||
9,072,000 | 7,887,000 | 7,400,000 | ||||||||||
Gross margin |
9,159,000 | 8,502,000 | 8,778,000 | |||||||||
Selling and administrative expense |
3,613,000 | 2,963,000 | 3,255,000 | |||||||||
Interest expense |
2,075,000 | 2,261,000 | 2,547,000 | |||||||||
Operating income |
3,471,000 | 3,278,000 | 2,976,000 | |||||||||
Interest and other income |
202,000 | 102,000 | 121,000 | |||||||||
Minority interest expense |
(1,126,000 | ) | (983,000 | ) | (928,000 | ) | ||||||
Income before income taxes |
2,547,000 | 2,397,000 | 2,169,000 | |||||||||
Income tax expense |
(780,000 | ) | (412,000 | ) | (787,000 | ) | ||||||
NET INCOME |
$ | 1,767,000 | $ | 1,985,000 | $ | 1,382,000 | ||||||
Earnings per common share basic |
$ | 0.36 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.36 | ||||||
Earnings per common share diluted |
$ | 0.35 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.27 | ||||||
See accompanying notes
3
Table of Contents
American Shared Hospital Services
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders Equity
THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | ||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Common | Paid-in | Retained | |||||||||||||||||
Shares | Stock | Capital | Earnings | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Balances at January 1, 2003 |
3,783,000 | $ | 9,173,000 | $ | 3,312,000 | $ | 2,055,000 | $ | 14,540,000 | |||||||||||
Options exercised |
135,000 | 25,000 | 163,000 | | 188,000 | |||||||||||||||
Repurchase of stock options |
| | (14,000 | ) | | (14,000 | ) | |||||||||||||
Dividends |
| | | (767,000 | ) | (767,000 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 1,382,000 | 1,382,000 | |||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2003 |
3,918,000 | 9,198,000 | 3,461,000 | 2,670,000 | 15,329,000 | |||||||||||||||
Options exercised |
858,000 | 40,000 | 994,000 | | 1,034,000 | |||||||||||||||
Repurchase of stock options |
| | (45,000 | ) | | (45,000 | ) | |||||||||||||
Dividends |
| | | (757,000 | ) | (757,000 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 1,985,000 | 1,985,000 | |||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2004 |
4,776,000 | 9,238,000 | 4,410,000 | 3,898,000 | 17,546,000 | |||||||||||||||
Options exercised |
357,000 | 157,000 | 445,000 | | 602,000 | |||||||||||||||
Common stock withheld on option exercises |
(114,000 | ) | (89,000 | ) | (581,000 | ) | | (670,000 | ) | |||||||||||
Dividends |
| | | (925,000 | ) | (925,000 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 1,767,000 | 1,767,000 | |||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2005 |
5,019,000 | $ | 9,306,000 | $ | 4,274,000 | $ | 4,740,000 | $ | 18,320,000 | |||||||||||
See accompanying notes
4
Table of Contents
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Table of Contents
American Shared Hospital Services
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, | ||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,767,000 | $ | 1,985,000 | $ | 1,382,000 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income
to net cash from operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
5,502,000 | 4,892,000 | 4,313,000 | |||||||||
Deferred income tax |
121,000 | 264,000 | 669,000 | |||||||||
Minority interest in consolidated
subsidiaries |
1,126,000 | 983,000 | 928,000 | |||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Receivables |
(1,069,000 | ) | (483,000 | ) | 104,000 | |||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
95,000 | (137,000 | ) | 426,000 | ||||||||
Accounts payable and
accrued liabilities |
938,000 | 104,000 | 318,000 | |||||||||
Net cash from operating activities |
8,480,000 | 7,608,000 | 8,140,000 | |||||||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||||||
Payment for purchase of property and
equipment |
(6,195,000 | ) | (6,308,000 | ) | (5,929,000 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sales and maturities of
marketable securities |
957,000 | | | |||||||||
Investment in marketable securities |
(7,334,000 | ) | (957,000 | ) | | |||||||
Net cash from investing activities |
(12,572,000 | ) | (7,265,000 | ) | (5,929,000 | ) |
6
Table of Contents
American Shared Hospital Services
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, | ||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||||||
Principal payments on long-term debt |
(7,122,000 | ) | (7,371,000 | ) | (5,777,000 | ) | ||||||
Principal payments on capital leases |
(297,000 | ) | | | ||||||||
Long term debt financing on purchase of
property and equipment |
5,275,000 | 5,940,000 | 5,198,000 | |||||||||
Capital lease financing |
1,740,000 | | | |||||||||
Payment of dividends |
(902,000 | ) | (699,000 | ) | (610,000 | ) | ||||||
Distributions to minority owners |
(912,000 | ) | (399,000 | ) | (645,000 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
157,000 | 40,000 | 25,000 | |||||||||
Repurchase of stock options |
(670,000 | ) | (45,000 | ) | (14,000 | ) | ||||||
Net cash from financing activities |
(2,731,000 | ) | (2,534,000 | ) | (1,823,000 | ) | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents |
(6,823,000 | ) | (2,191,000 | ) | 388,000 | |||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,
beginning of year |
8,121,000 | 10,312,000 | 9,924,000 | |||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS,
end of year |
$ | 1,298,000 | $ | 8,121,000 | $ | 10,312,000 | ||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURE |
||||||||||||
Interest paid |
$ | 2,075,000 | $ | 2,500,000 | $ | 2,692,000 | ||||||
Income taxes paid |
$ | 229,000 | $ | 129,000 | $ | 88,000 | ||||||
SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||||||
Accrued dividends |
$ | 238,000 | $ | 215,000 | $ | 157,000 | ||||||
Income tax benefit from stock option exercise
recorded to Additional paid-in capital |
$ | 445,000 | $ | 994,000 | $ | 163,000 |
See accompanying notes
7
Table of Contents
American Shared Hospital Services
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 Business and Basis of Presentation
Business American Shared Hospital Services (the Company), a California corporation, provides
Leksell Gamma Knife ® (Gamma Knife) units to twenty-one medical centers in Arkansas, California,
Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Nevada, New Jersey, New
Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas and Wisconsin.
The Company (through American Shared Radiosurgery Services (ASRS)) and Elekta AB, the
manufacturer of the Gamma Knife (through its wholly owned United States subsidiary GKV Investments,
Inc. (GKV)), entered into an operating agreement and formed GK Financing, LLC (GKF). GKF
provides alternative financing of Gamma Knife units and is the preferred provider for Elekta AB of
alternative financing arrangements, such as fee-for-service lease arrangements with health care
institutions in the United States and Brazil.
OR21, Inc., is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company that will provide the product The
Operating Room for the 21st Century®, which is currently under development.
MedLeader.com, Inc., is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company that will provide continuing
medical education online and through videos for doctors, nurses and other healthcare workers. This
subsidiary is not operational at this time.
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly owned
subsidiaries, OR21, Inc., MedLeader.com, Inc., ASRS and its majority-owned subsidiary, GK
Financing, LLC.
All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Note 2 Accounting Policies
Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements In preparing financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America,
management makes estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and cash equivalents The Company considers all liquid investments with original maturities
of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Restricted cash is not
considered a cash equivalent for purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows.
Securities The Company invests excess cash in short to long term fixed income marketable
securities. It is the Companys intent and ability to hold these securities until maturity and
they
are therefore regarded as held-to-maturity investments. As of December 31, 2005, the cost of these
securities approximated fair market value, and they ranged in maturity up to approximately
8
Table of Contents
American Shared Hospital
Services
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 2 Accounting Policies (Continued)
eighteen months. The value of those securities with maturity dates greater than one year are
considered long-term securities and are classified accordingly on the balance sheet.
Restricted cash Restricted cash represents the minimum cash that, by agreement, must be
maintained in GKF to fund operations.
Business and credit risk The Company maintains its cash balances, which exceed federally insured
limits, in financial institutions. Additionally the Companys securities are invested in short to
long term fixed income securities that are not insured. The Company has not experienced any losses
and believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash, cash equivalents and
securities.
All of the Companys revenue is provided by twenty-one customers. These customers constitute
accounts receivable at December 31, 2005. The Company performs credit evaluations of its customers
and generally does not require collateral. The Company has not experienced significant losses
related to receivables from individual customers or groups of customers in any particular
geographic area.
Accounts receivable and doubtful accounts Accounts receivable are recorded at net realizable
value. An allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated based on historical collections plus an
allowance for probable losses. Receivables are considered past due based on contractual terms and
are charged off in the period that they are deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of receivables
previously charged off are recorded when received.
Accounting for majority-owned subsidiary The Company accounts for GKF as a consolidated entity
due to its 81% majority-equity interest.
Property and equipment Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation is determined using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
assets, which for medical and office equipment is generally 3 15 years. The Company capitalized
interest of $17,000 and $94,000 in 2005 and 2004, respectively, as costs of medical equipment.
The Company leases Gamma Knife equipment to its customers under arrangements accounted for as
operating leases. At December 31, 2005, the Company held equipment under operating lease contracts
with customers with an original cost of $55,348,000 and accumulated depreciation of $24,074,000. At
December 31, 2004, the Company held equipment under operating lease contracts with customers with
an original cost of $46,915,000 and accumulated depreciation of $19,010,000.
Revenue recognition - Revenue is recognized when services have been rendered and
collectibility is reasonably assured. There are no guaranteed minimum payments. The Companys
contracts are typically for a ten year term and are classified as either fee per use or
9
Table of Contents
American Shared Hospital
Services
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 2 Accounting Policies (Continued)
retail. Retail arrangements are further classified as either turn-key or net revenue sharing.
Revenue from fee per use contracts is recorded on a gross basis as determined by each hospitals
contracted rate. Under turn-key arrangements, the Company receives payment from the hospital
in the amount of its reimbursement from third party payors, and is responsible for paying all
the operating costs of the Gamma Knife. Revenue is recorded on a gross basis and estimated based
on historical experience and hospital contracts with third party payors. For net revenue sharing
arrangements the Company receives a contracted percentage of the reimbursement received by the
hospital less the operating expenses of the Gamma Knife. Revenue is recorded on a net basis and
estimated based on historical experience. Any revenue estimates are reviewed periodically and
adjusted as necessary. Revenue recognition is consistent with guidelines provided under EITF
99-19.
Income taxes The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on
differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are
measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are
expected to reverse.
Earnings per share Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income
available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for
the year. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if common
shares were issued pursuant to the exercise of options or warrants. The following table
illustrates the computations of basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December
31, 2005, 2004 and 2003.
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
Numerator for basic and diluted
earnings per share |
$ | 1,767,000 | $ | 1,985,000 | $ | 1,382,000 | ||||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||||
Denominator for basic earnings per
share weighted-average shares |
4,931,000 | 4,351,000 | 3,850,000 | |||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities |
||||||||||||
Employee stock options |
160,000 | 750,000 | 1,238,000 | |||||||||
Denominator for diluted earnings
per share adjusted weighted-
average shares |
$ | 5,091,000 | $ | 5,101,000 | $ | 5,088,000 | ||||||
Earning per share basic |
$ | 0.36 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.36 | ||||||
Earning per share diluted |
$ | 0.35 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.27 | ||||||
10
Table of Contents
American Shared Hospital
Services
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 2 Accounting Policies (Continued)
In 2005, options outstanding to purchase 76,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$6.16 $6.45 per share were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share as the
exercise price of the options was greater than the average market price of common stock during the
year.
In 2004 options outstanding to purchase 16,500 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $5.50
per share were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share as the exercise price
of the options was greater than the average market price of common stock during the year.
Reclassifications Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2004 balances to conform with
the 2005 presentation.
Stock-based compensation The Company had in effect two stock-based employee compensation plans
during 2005, which are described more fully in Note 7. The Company accounts for those plans under
the recognition and measurement principles of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, and related Interpretations. No stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in
net income, as all options granted under those plans had an exercise price greater than or equal to
the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The following table
illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair
value recognition provisions of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to
stock-based employee compensation. For pro forma purposes, the estimated fair value of the
Companys options is amortized over the options vesting period, which is generally from one to
five years.
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, | ||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
Net income, as reported |
$ | 1,767,000 | $ | 1,985,000 | $ | 1,382,000 | ||||||
Deduct: total stock-based employee
compensation expense
determined under fair value based
method for all awards (Note 7),
net of related tax effects |
(36,000 | ) | (9,000 | ) | (3,000 | ) | ||||||
Proforma net income |
$ | 1,731,000 | $ | 1,976,000 | $ | 1,379,000 | ||||||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||||||
Basic as reported |
$ | 0.36 | $ | 0.46 | $ | 0.36 | ||||||
Basic pro forma |
$ | 0.35 | $ | 0.45 | $ | 0.36 | ||||||
Diluted as reported |
$ | 0.35 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.27 | ||||||
Diluted pro forma |
$ | 0.34 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 0.27 |
11
Table of Contents
American Shared Hospital
Services
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 2 Accounting Policies (Continued)
Fair value of financial instruments The carrying amounts of financial instruments, including cash
and cash equivalents, securities, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and other
accrued liabilities approximated their fair value as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 because of the
relatively short maturity of these instruments. The fair value of the Companys various debt
obligations, discounted at currently available interest rates was approximately $25,088,000 and
$25,637,000 at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Business segment information - The Company, which engages in the business of leasing
equipment to health care providers, has one reportable segment, the Gamma Knife that non-invasively
treats malignant and benign brain tumors, vascular malformations and trigeminal neuralgia.
Recent accounting pronouncements In December 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46(R): Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, an interpretation of ARB No. 51, which replaces FASB Interpretation No.
46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (VIE). This Interpretation addresses consolidation
by business enterprises of Variable Interest Entities. It defines a VIE as a corporation,
partnership, trust, or any other legal structure used for the business purpose that either: a) the
equity investment is not sufficient to allow the entity to finance its activities without
additional financial support, b) the equity investors lack one or more of the following: 1. the
ability to make decisions; 2. the obligation to absorb expected losses of the entity; or 3. the
right to receive any returns of the entity, and, c) the equity investors have voting rights
disproportionate to their economic interest, and the activities of the entity are conducted on
behalf of an investor with a disproportionately small voting interest. This interpretation
requires that existing unconsolidated VIEs be consolidated by their primary beneficiaries. The
Company does not have any VIE entities and accordingly the implementation of the Interpretation did
not result in an impact on its financial statements.
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 123R, Share-Based Payment. This statement replaces
FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. This statement amends FASB Statement No. 95, Statement
of Cash Flows. This statement requires that the cost resulting from all share-based payment
transactions be recognized in the financial statements. This statement requires that excess tax
benefits be reported as a financing cash inflow rather than as a reduction of taxes paid. This
Statement establishes fair value as the measurement objective in accounting for the cost of
share-based payment arrangements and requires all entities to apply a fair-value-based measurement
method in accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees. This cost will be
recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for
the awardthe requisite service period (usually the vesting period). The Company is required to
adopt FASB Statement No. 123R in first quarter 2006. Based on the Companys historical stock
option awards, adoption of this statement will have minimal impact on the Companys financial
statements.
12
Table of Contents
American Shared Hospital
Services
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 3 Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consists of the following:
DECEMBER 31, | ||||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Medical equipment and facilities |
$ | 59,147,000 | $ | 49,336,000 | ||||
Office equipment |
549,000 | 438,000 | ||||||
Deposits and construction in progress |
703,000 | 4,499,000 | ||||||
60,399,000 | 54,273,000 | |||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
(25,409,000 | ) | (20,001,000 | ) | ||||
Net property and equipment |
$ | 34,990,000 | $ | 34,272,000 | ||||
As of December 31, 2005, the Company has equipment that is secured under capitalized leases with a
total cost of approximately $8,545,000, which is included in Medical equipment and facilities, and
associated accumulated depreciation totaling approximately $4,027,000.
Note 4 Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consists primarily of 19 notes with financing companies, related to Gamma Knife
construction and installation, totaling $20,884,000. These notes accrue interest at fixed annual
rates between 7.98% and 10.95%, are payable in 60 to 84 monthly installments, mature between March
2006 and April 2012, and are collateralized by the respective Gamma Knife units. As of December 31,
2005 and December 31, 2004 the Company was in compliance with all debt covenants required under
notes with its lenders. The following are contractual maturities of long-term debt by year at
December 31, 2005:
Year ending December 31, |
||||
2006 |
$ | 5,631,000 | ||
2007 |
4,867,000 | |||
2008 |
3,859,000 | |||
2009 |
3,893,000 | |||
2010 |
1,990,000 | |||
Thereafter |
644,000 | |||
$ | 20,884,000 | |||
13
Table of Contents
American Shared Hospital
Services
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 Income Taxes
Significant components of the Companys deferred tax liabilities and assets as of December 31 are
as follows:
DECEMBER 31, | ||||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
||||||||
Fixed assets |
$ | (5,641,000 | ) | $ | (5,548,000 | ) | ||
Total deferred tax liabilities |
(5,641,000 | ) | (5,548,000 | ) | ||||
Deferred tax assets: |
||||||||
Net operating loss carryforwards |
4,307,000 | 4,418,000 | ||||||
Accrued reserves |
276,000 | 263,000 | ||||||
Other net |
571,000 | 501,000 | ||||||
Total deferred tax assets |
5,154,000 | 5,182,000 | ||||||
Net deferred tax liabilities |
$ | (487,000 | ) | $ | (366,000 | ) | ||
These amounts are presented in the financial statements as follows:
DECEMBER 31, | ||||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
Current deferred tax assets |
$ | 341,000 | $ | 261,000 | ||||
Deferred income taxes (non-current) |
(828,000 | ) | (627,000 | ) | ||||
$ | (487,000 | ) | $ | (366,000 | ) | |||
The 2005 and 2004 tax provision reflects the deduction for tax purposes of non-qualified stock
options exercised by the Companys Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The benefit of the tax
deduction is reflected as a direct increase to equity and an increase in the deferred tax asset of
$616,000 and $1,540,000 for 2005 and 2004 respectively, which is described more fully in Note 7.
14
Table of Contents
American Shared Hospital
Services
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 5 Income Taxes (Continued)
The components of the provision for income taxes consist of the following:
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, | ||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
Current: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | 449,000 | $ | | $ | | ||||||
State |
210,000 | 47,000 | 38,000 | |||||||||
Total current |
659,000 | 47,000 | 38,000 | |||||||||
Deferred: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
(74,000 | ) | 296,000 | 649,000 | ||||||||
State |
195,000 | 69,000 | 100,000 | |||||||||
Total deferred |
121,000 | 365,000 | 749,000 | |||||||||
$ | 780,000 | $ | 412,000 | $ | 787,000 | |||||||
The provision for income taxes differs from the amount computed by applying the U.S. federal
statutory tax rate (34% in 2005, 2004 and 2003) to income before taxes as follows:
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, | ||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
Computed expected tax |
$ | 866,000 | $ | 815,000 | $ | 741,000 | ||||||
State income taxes, net of federal
benefit |
167,000 | 144,000 | 127,000 | |||||||||
Stock options |
(193,000 | ) | (547,000 | ) | (81,000 | ) | ||||||
Other |
(60,000 | ) | | | ||||||||
$ | 780,000 | $ | 412,000 | $ | 787,000 | |||||||
At December 31, 2005, the Company had a net operating loss carryforward for federal income tax
return purposes of approximately $12,800,000 and for state purposes $1,900,000 which expire between 2006 and 2024. A substantial part
of this carryforward is subject to separate return limitations. The Companys ability to utilize
its net operating loss carryforwards and other deferred tax assets may be limited in the event of a
50% or more ownership change within any three-year period. Future federal net operating losses
generated by the Company can be carried forward for 20 years.
15
Table of Contents
American Shared Hospital
Services
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 6 Minority Interest
The Minority interest liability reflects the 19% interest by the minority partner in the Companys
GK Financing, LLC subsidiary. The balance increases (decreases) by the minority partners share of
the earnings (losses) in GK Financing, LLC, and is reduced by any cash distributions made to the
minority partner, per the following table:
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, | ||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 2,315,000 | $ | 1,731,000 | $ | 1,448,000 | ||||||
Minority interest in GKF net income |
1,126,000 | 983,000 | 928,000 | |||||||||
Less: cash distributions |
(912,000 | ) | (399,000 | ) | (645,000 | ) | ||||||
Minority interest |
$ | 2,529,000 | $ | 2,315,000 | $ | 1,731,000 | ||||||
Note 7 Shareholders Equity
1995 Stock Option Plan
The Companys 1995 Stock Option Plan (the 1995 Plan) provided for nonqualified stock options and
incentive stock options. Under the 1995 Plan, 330,000 common shares were authorized for grant to
officers and other key employees, non-employee directors, and advisors. The 1995 Plan terminated
according to its terms on August 15, 2005. Provisions of the 1995 Plan included an automatic grant
to each non-employee director of options to purchase up to 4,000 shares annually on the date of the
Companys Annual Shareholder Meeting, at an exercise price equal to the market price of the
Companys common shares on that date, until the non-employee director has options for a total of
12,000 shares of the Companys common stock in all Company stock option plans. Directors who are
appointed or elected to the Companys Board of Directors on a date other than that of the Annual
Shareholder Meeting received a pro-rata grant of such options, at an exercise price equal to the
market price of the Companys common shares on the date of grant. There were approximately 140,000
options issued and exercisable as of December 31, 2005.
2001 Stock Option Plan
The Companys 2001 Stock Option Plan (the 2001 Plan), provides for nonqualified stock options and
incentive stock options. Under the 2001 Plan, 250,000 common shares are reserved for awards to
officers of the Company, other key employees, non-employee directors, and advisors. Provisions of
the 2001 Plan include an automatic grant to each non-employee director of options to purchase up to
4,000 shares annually on the date of the Companys Annual
Shareholder Meeting, at an exercise price equal to the market price of the Companys common shares
on that date, until the non-employee director has options for a total of 12,000 shares of the
16
Table of Contents
American Shared Hospital
Services
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 7 Shareholders Equity (Continued)
Companys common stock in all Company stock option plans. Directors who are appointed or elected
to the Companys Board of Directors on a date other than that of the Annual Shareholder Meeting
receive a pro-rata grant of such options, at an exercise price equal to the market price of the
Companys common shares on the date of grant. As of December 31, 2005, approximately 7,000 stock
options had been granted under the 2001 Plan.
Changes in options outstanding under the Stock Option Plans from January 1, 2003 to
December 31, 2005 are as follows :
Weighted | ||||||||
Number | Average | |||||||
of Options | Exercise Price | |||||||
Balance at January 1, 2003 |
188,000 | $ | 1.943 | |||||
Granted |
11,000 | $ | 5.272 | |||||
Exercised |
(10,000 | ) | $ | 2.400 | ||||
Forfeited |
(5,000 | ) | $ | 4.100 | ||||
Repurchased |
(5,000 | ) | $ | 3.000 | ||||
Balance at December 31, 2003 |
179,000 | $ | 2.156 | |||||
Granted |
26,000 | $ | 5.475 | |||||
Exercised |
(15,000 | ) | $ | 2.478 | ||||
Forfeited |
(10,000 | ) | $ | 5.717 | ||||
Repurchased |
(12,000 | ) | $ | 3.494 | ||||
Balance at December 31, 2004 |
168,000 | $ | 2.269 | |||||
Granted |
83,000 | $ | 6.123 | |||||
Exercised |
(93,000 | ) | $ | 1.665 | ||||
Forfeited |
(11,000 | ) | $ | 4.065 | ||||
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
147,000 | $ | 5.029 | |||||
The weighted average fair value of the options granted in 2005 was $1.52.
17
Table of Contents
American Shared Hospital
Services
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 7 Shareholders Equity (Continued)
Shares and Options Issued to Officer
On August 15, 1995, the Companys Chairman and Chief Executive Officer was granted a ten-year,
immediately exercisable option to purchase 1,495,000 common shares for an exercise price of $.01
per share for which the Company recorded compensation expense of $2,414,000. These options were
granted to the officer as final consideration for personal guarantees of credit facilities and for
continued employment with the Company. The officer exercised 264,000, 846,000 and 125,000 options
during 2005, 2004 and 2003 respectively. The exercise in 2005 resulted in a $445,000 increase in
paid in capital and a $616,000 increase in deferred tax assets. The exercise in 2004 resulted in a
$994,000 increase to additional paid in capital and a $1,540,000 increase in deferred tax assets,
and in 2003 the exercise resulted in a $163,000 increase to additional paid in capital and a
$244,000 increase in deferred tax assets. All options granted under the plan were exercised prior
to the termination of the plan according to its terms on August 15, 2005.
The following table summarizes information about all options outstanding at December 31, 2005:
Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||
Remaining | Average | Average | ||||||||||||||||||
Range of | Number | Contractual | Exercise | Number | Exercise | |||||||||||||||
Exercise Prices | Outstanding | Life (Years) | Price | Exercisable | Price | |||||||||||||||
1.625 1.688
|
6,000 | 0.83 | 1.646 | 6,000 | 1.646 | |||||||||||||||
3.000 4.100
|
41,000 | 3.79 | 3.201 | 41,000 | 3.201 | |||||||||||||||
4.570 5.500
|
24,000 | 8.23 | 5.318 | 13,000 | 5.173 | |||||||||||||||
6.160 6.450
|
76,000 | 9.54 | 6.185 | | | |||||||||||||||
$ 1.625
6.450
|
147,000 | 7.37 | $ | 5.029 | 60,000 | $ | 3.473 | |||||||||||||
At December 31, 2005 and 2004, 60,000 and 411,000 options, respectively, were vested and
exercisable. Automatic option awards issued to non-employee directors vest one year after their
issuance. The vesting period for all other options issued under the Companys plans is determined
by the Board of Directors at the time the options are issued. Discretionary options awarded during
2005 and 2004 vest over a five year period.
Pro Forma Information related to Option Grants
Pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share is required by SFAS 123 for
awards granted after December 31, 1995, as if the Company had accounted for its stock-based awards
to employees under the fair value method of SFAS 123. The fair value of the Companys stock-based
awards to employees was estimated using a Black-Scholes option pricing model.
18
Table of Contents
American Shared Hospital
Services
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 7 Shareholders Equity (Continued)
The Black-Scholes options valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of
traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, the
Black-Scholes model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected
stock price volatility. Because the Companys stock-based awards to employees have characteristics
significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input
assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in managements opinion, the existing
models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its stock-based
awards to employees. The effects of applying SFAS No. 123 in the proforma disclosure are not
indicative of future amounts. The fair value of the Companys option grants under the 1995 and
2001 Plans was estimated assuming the following weighted-average assumptions:
2005 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
Expected life (years) |
10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | |||||||||
Expected volatility |
25.0 | % | 37.0 | % | 29.0 | % | ||||||
Dividend yield |
3.1 | % | 3.0 | % | 3.0 | % | ||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
4.3 | % | 4.5 | % | 4.3 | % |
Repurchase of Common Stock, Common Stock Warrants and Stock Options
In 1999 and 2001, the Board of Directors approved resolutions authorizing the Company to repurchase
up to a total of 1,000,000 shares of its own stock on the open market. There have been no shares
repurchased on the open market since the year ending December 31, 2001.
During 2005, the Company withheld 114,000 shares upon the exercise of options by two officers of
the Company, to pay the exercise price of the shares and the withholding taxes associated with the
exercises. The value of the exercise price is recorded as a reduction to common stock, and the
difference between the exercise price and the market price at the time of exercise is recorded as a
reduction to paid-in-capital.
In 2004 and 2003, the Company repurchased 12,000 and 5,000 options respectively under the 1995
stock option plan from former employees. The repurchase of the options is recorded as a reduction
in additional paid-in-capital.
Dividends
In December 2005 the Company declared dividends of $0.0475 per share, payable in January 2006.
In January, April, July and October of 2005 the Company paid dividends of $0.045, $0.045, $0.0475
and $0.0475 per share respectively. In January, April, July and October of 2004 the
Company paid dividends of $0.04, $0.04, $0.0425 and $0.045 per share respectively. The Company
paid dividends of $0.16 per share in the year ended December 31, 2003.
19
Table of Contents
American Shared Hospital
Services
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 8 Retirement Plan
The Company has a defined-contribution retirement plan (the Plan) that allows for a matching safe
harbor contribution. For 2005, the Board of Directors elected to match participant deferred salary
contributions up to a maximum of 4% of the participants annual compensation. Matching
contributions must be invested in shares of the Companys stock. Discretionary profit sharing
contributions are allowed under the Plan in years that the Board does not elect a safe harbor
match. The Company contributed $33,000 and $35,000 to the Plan for the safe harbor match for each
of the years ended December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. The Company has accrued
$44,000 for the estimated safe harbor matching contribution for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Note 9 Obligations Under Capital Leases
During 2005 the Company entered into three capital lease obligations with three financing
companies, collateralized by Gamma Knife equipment having an aggregate net book value of
approximately $4,518,000 at December 31, 2005. These obligations have stated interest rates
ranging between 7.74% and 7.99%, are payable in 42 to 84 monthly installments, and mature between
June 2009 and September 2012.
Future minimum lease payments, together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments
under capital leases at December 31, 2005, are summarized as follows:
Net Present Value | ||||
of Minimum | ||||
Lease Payments | ||||
Year ending December 31, |
||||
2006 |
$ | 1,050,000 | ||
2007 |
1,050,000 | |||
2008 |
1,050,000 | |||
2009 |
762,000 | |||
2010 |
557,000 | |||
Thereafter |
668,000 | |||
Total capital lease payments |
5,137,000 | |||
Less imputed interest |
939,000 | |||
4,198,000 | ||||
Less current portion |
746,000 | |||
$ | 3,452,000 | |||
20
Table of Contents
American Shared Hospital
Services
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 10 Operating Leases
The Company leases office space and equipment under operating leases expiring at various dates
through 2009.
Future minimum payments under noncancelable operating leases having initial terms of more than one
year consisted of the following at December 31, 2005:
Year ending December 31, |
||||
2006 |
208,000 | |||
2007 |
9,000 | |||
2008 |
9,000 | |||
2009 |
9,000 | |||
$ | 235,000 | |||
Payments for repair and maintenance agreements incorporated in operating lease agreements are
included in the future minimum operating lease payments shown above.
Rent expense was $386,000, $323,000, and $315,000 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and
2003, respectively, and includes the above operating leases as well as month-to-month rental and
certain executory costs.
The Company subleases a portion of its office space to two third parties for approximately $2,000
per month under sub-sublease agreements that expire in May 2006.
Note 11 Commitments and Contingencies
Under the terms of existing Gamma Knife quotation agreements, the Company is committed to purchase
upgrades and cobalt reloads to certain existing Gamma Knife equipment for $2,109,000 when the
equipment is upgraded at each customer location. At December 31, 2005, the Company had $677,000 in
deposits related to these purchase commitments which are classified as construction in progress.
Note 12 Major Customers
Revenues from the Companys Gamma Knife segment were provided by twenty-one customers in 2005,
eighteen customers in 2004, and seventeen customers in 2003. No individual customer exceeded 10%
of the Companys total revenue in any of these years.
21