AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP - Quarter Report: 2013 September (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013

OR

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number 1-898

AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION

600 Grant Street, Suite 4600

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219

(Address of principal executive offices)

(412) 456-4400

(Registrant’s telephone number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

On November 1, 2013, 10,362,746 common shares were outstanding.

Table of Contents

AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION

INDEX

2

Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(UNAUDITED)

(in thousands, except par value)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

Table of Contents

AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

Table of Contents

AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(UNAUDITED)

(in thousands)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

Table of Contents

AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

(in thousands)

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

6

Table of Contents

AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

(in thousands, except share and claim amounts)

The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2013 and the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 and the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 have been prepared by Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (the Corporation) without audit. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of only normal and recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented, have been made. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results expected for the full year.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted.

Recently Implemented Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2011-11, Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which requires expanded disclosures, including gross and net information, about financial and derivative instruments that are either offset in the balance sheet or are subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. The guidance became effective for reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 and is to be applied retrospectively. The new guidance affects disclosures only and did not impact operating results, financial position or liquidity of the Corporation.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, Comprehensive Income: Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which requires entities to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the respective line items in net income if the amount being reclassified is required to be reclassified in its entirety to net income. Information may be reported either on the face of the income statement or in the footnotes to the financial statements. For other amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, an entity is required to cross-reference to other required disclosures. The guidance became effective for reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The guidance affects disclosures only. It does not change whether items are reported in net income or other comprehensive income or when items in other comprehensive income are reclassified to net income; accordingly, ASU 2013-02 did not impact the operating results, financial position or liquidity of the Corporation.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-11, Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists, which requires, under certain circumstances, an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, to be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward. The guidance becomes effective for reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014. Currently, the Corporation records unrecognized tax benefits as a liability; accordingly, implementation of the guidance may affect balance sheet presentation but will not impact operating results or liquidity of the Corporation.

At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, approximately 64% and 68%, respectively, of the inventories were valued on the LIFO method with the remaining inventories valued on the FIFO method. Inventories were comprised of the following:

7

Table of Contents

Property, plant and equipment were comprised of the following:

Land and buildings of Union Electric Steel UK Limited (UES-UK) equal to approximately $4,560 (£2,818) at September 30, 2013 are held as collateral by the trustees of the UES-UK contributory defined benefit pension plan (see Note 5).

Other current liabilities were comprised of the following:

Included in customer-related liabilities are costs expected to be incurred with respect to product warranties. Changes in the liability for product warranty claims consisted of the following:

Contributions were as follows:

8

Table of Contents

Net periodic pension and other postretirement costs include the following components:

Outstanding standby and commercial letters of credit as of September 30, 2013 approximated $18,065, the majority of which serve as collateral for the Industrial Revenue Bond debt.

In 2010, UES-UK was awarded a government grant of up to $1,325 (£850) toward the purchase and installation of certain machinery and equipment of which $1,083 (£680) has been received to date. Under the agreement, the grant is repayable if certain conditions are not met including achieving and maintaining a targeted level of employment through 2017. UES-UK’s level of employment currently exceeds and is expected to continue to exceed the targeted level of employment; accordingly, no liability has been recorded.

See Note 7 regarding foreign exchange contracts and commodities.

See Note 12 regarding litigation and Note 13 for environmental matters.

Certain of the Corporation’s operations are subject to risk from exchange rate fluctuations in connection with sales in foreign currencies. To minimize this risk, foreign currency sales contracts are entered into which are designated as cash flow or fair value hedges and are recorded in the consolidated balance sheet as either an asset or a liability measured at their fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on the use of the derivative. To the extent that a derivative is designated and effective as a cash flow hedge of an exposure to future changes in value, the change in fair value of the derivative is deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Any portion considered to be ineffective, including that arising from the unlikelihood of an anticipated transaction to occur, is reported as a component of earnings (other income/expense) immediately. Upon occurrence of the anticipated transaction, the derivative designated and effective as a cash flow hedge is de-designated as a fair value hedge and the change in fair value previously deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is reclassified to earnings (net sales) with subsequent changes in fair value recorded as a component of earnings (other income/expense). To the extent that a derivative is designated and effective as a hedge of an exposure to changes in fair value, the change in the derivative’s fair value will be offset in the consolidated statement of operations by the change in the fair value of the item being hedged and is recorded as a component of earnings (other income/expense).

9

Table of Contents

As of September 30, 2013, approximately $13,580 of anticipated foreign-denominated sales has been hedged which are covered by fair value contracts settling at various dates through July 2014. The fair value of assets held as collateral for the fair value contracts as of September 30, 2013 approximated $800. As of September 30, 2013, there were no cash flow contracts outstanding for future sales.

Additionally, certain of the Corporation’s divisions are subject to risk from increases in the price of commodities (copper and aluminum) used in the production of inventory. To minimize this risk, futures contracts are entered into which are designated as cash flow hedges. The change in fair value of the derivative is deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Any portion considered to be ineffective, including that arising from the unlikelihood of an anticipated transaction to occur, is reported as a component of earnings (other income/expense) immediately. Upon occurrence of the anticipated transaction, the futures contract is settled and the change in fair value previously deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is reclassified to earnings (costs of products sold, excluding depreciation) when the projected sales occur. At September 30, 2013, approximately 57% or $3,006 of anticipated copper purchases over the next nine months and 56% or $438 of anticipated aluminum purchases over the next six months are hedged. The fair value of assets held as collateral as of September 30, 2013 equaled $400.

The Corporation previously entered into foreign currency purchase contracts to manage the volatility associated with Euro-denominated progress payments to be made for certain machinery and equipment. As of December 31, 2010, all contracts had been settled and the underlying fixed assets were placed in service. The change in the fair value is included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and is being amortized to pre-tax earnings (as an offset to depreciation expense) over the life of the underlying assets.

No portion of the existing cash flow or fair value hedges is considered to be ineffective, including any ineffectiveness arising from the unlikelihood of an anticipated transaction to occur. Additionally, no amounts have been excluded from assessing the effectiveness of the hedge.

At September 30, 2013, the Corporation has purchase commitments covering 45% or $5,000 of anticipated natural gas usage through 2015 at one of its subsidiaries. The commitments qualify as normal purchases and, accordingly, are not reflected on the consolidated balance sheet.

The Corporation does not enter into derivative transactions for speculative purposes and, therefore, holds no derivative instruments for trading purposes.

Gains (losses) on foreign exchange transactions included in other income (expense) approximated $(135) and $77 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $(528) and $155 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The location and fair value of the foreign currency sales contracts recorded on the consolidated balance sheets were as follows:

10

Table of Contents

The change in the fair value of the cash flow contracts is recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The fair value balances as of September 30, 2013 and 2012 and the amount recognized as and reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for each of the periods is summarized below. All amounts are after-tax.

11

Table of Contents

The change in fair value reclassified or expected to be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to earnings is summarized below. All amounts are pre-tax.

Net change and ending balances for the various components of other comprehensive income (loss) and accumulated other comprehensive loss as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 is summarized below. Amounts are net of tax, where applicable.

12

Table of Contents

The following summarizes the line items affected on the condensed consolidated statements of operations for components reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Amounts in parentheses represent credits to net income.

The income tax expense (benefit) associated with the various components of other comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 is summarized below. Foreign currency translation adjustments exclude the effect of income taxes since earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries are deemed to be reinvested for an indefinite period of time.

In May 2011, the shareholders of the Corporation approved the adoption of the 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan (Incentive Plan) which authorizes the issuance of up to 1,000,000 shares of the Corporation’s common stock for grants of equity-based compensation. Awards under the Incentive Plan may include incentive non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares and restricted stock units, performance awards, other stock-based awards or short-term cash incentive awards. The Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors who has the authority to determine, within the limits of the express provisions of the Incentive Plan, the individuals to whom the awards will be granted; the nature, amount and terms of such awards; and the objectives and conditions for earning such awards.

In May 2013, the Compensation Committee granted 173,750 non-qualified stock options to select employees. The options have a ten-year life and vest over a three-year period. The exercise price of $17.16 was equal to the closing price of the Corporation’s common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant and the fair value of the options was $5.82 per share. The fair value of the options as of the date of grant was calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on an assumption for the expected life of the options of six years, a risk-free interest rate of 1.26%, an expected dividend yield of 4.20%, expected forfeiture rate of 5% and an expected volatility of 52.68%. The resultant stock-based compensation expense of $961 will be recognized over the requisite service period of three years.

13

Table of Contents

The Incentive Plan also provides for annual grants of shares of the Corporation’s common stock to non-employee directors following the Corporation’s annual shareholder meeting. Each annual director award will be for a number of shares having a fair market value equal to $25 and will be fully vested as of the grant date. In May 2013, 11,656 shares of the Corporation’s common stock were issued to the non-employee directors.

Stock-based compensation expense for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 equaled $341 and $296, respectively. The related income tax benefit recognized in the condensed consolidated statement of operations for each of the periods was approximately $120 and $103, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 equaled $845 and $961, respectively. The related income tax benefit recognized in the condensed consolidated statement of operations for each of the periods was approximately $296 and $336, respectively.

The Corporation’s financial assets and liabilities that are reported at fair value in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 were as follows:

Presented below are the net sales and income before income taxes for the Corporation’s two business segments. Income before income taxes for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 for the Air and Liquid Processing segment includes a credit of approximately $16,340 representing estimated additional insurance recoveries through 2022 for asbestos litigation on account of insurance coverage settlement agreements entered into during the quarter (see Note 12).

14

Table of Contents

The Corporation and its subsidiaries are involved in various claims and lawsuits incidental to their businesses. In addition, it is also subject to asbestos litigation as described below.

Asbestos Litigation

Claims have been asserted alleging personal injury from exposure to asbestos-containing components historically used in some products of predecessors of the Corporation’s Air & Liquid Systems Corporation subsidiary (“Asbestos Liability”) and of an inactive subsidiary in dissolution. Those subsidiaries, and in some cases the Corporation, are defendants (among a number of defendants, often in excess of 50) in cases filed in various state and federal courts.

Asbestos Claims

The following table reflects approximate information about the claims for Asbestos Liability against the subsidiaries and the Corporation, along with certain asbestos claims asserted against the inactive subsidiary in dissolution:

A substantial majority of the settlement and defense costs reflected in the above table was reported and paid by insurers. Because claims are often filed and can be settled or dismissed in large groups, the amount and timing of settlements, as well as the number of open claims, can fluctuate significantly from period to period.

Asbestos Insurance

The Corporation and its Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (“Air & Liquid”) subsidiary are parties to a series of settlement agreements (“Settlement Agreements”) with insurers that have coverage obligations for Asbestos Liability (the “Settling Insurers”). Under the Settlement Agreements, the Settling Insurers accept financial responsibility, subject to the terms and conditions of the respective agreements, including overall coverage limits, for pending and future claims for Asbestos Liability. The Settlement Agreements encompass the substantial majority of insurance policies that provide coverage for claims for Asbestos Liability. The claims against the Corporation’s inactive subsidiary in dissolution, numbering approximately 289 as of September 30, 2013, are not included within the Settlement Agreements. The Corporation believes that the claims against the inactive subsidiary in dissolution are immaterial and those claims were all resolved in the fourth quarter of 2013.

The Settlement Agreements include acknowledgements that Howden North America, Inc. (“Howden”) is entitled to coverage under policies covering Asbestos Liability for claims arising out of the historical products manufactured or distributed by Buffalo Forge, a former subsidiary of the Corporation (the “Products”). The Settlement Agreements do not provide for any prioritization on access to the applicable policies or any sub limits of liability as to Howden or the Corporation and Air & Liquid, and, accordingly, Howden may access the coverage afforded by the Settling Insurers for any covered claim arising out of a Product. In general, access by Howden to the coverage afforded by the Settling Insurers for the Products will erode coverage under the Settlement Agreements available to the Corporation and Air & Liquid for Asbestos Liability.

15

Table of Contents

On February 24, 2011, the Corporation and Air & Liquid filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania against thirteen domestic insurance companies, certain underwriters at Lloyd’s, London and certain London market insurance companies, and Howden. The lawsuit seeks a declaratory judgment regarding the respective rights and obligations of the parties under excess insurance policies that were issued to the Corporation from 1981 through 1984 as respects claims against the Corporation and its subsidiary for Asbestos Liability and as respects asbestos bodily-injury claims against Howden arising from the Products. The Corporation and Air & Liquid have reached settlement agreements with all but two of the defendant insurers in the coverage action. Effective October 8, 2012, the Corporation and Air & Liquid entered into a settlement agreement with eight of the domestic defendant insurers in the action. That agreement specifies the terms and conditions upon which the insurer parties are to contribute to defense and indemnity costs for claims for Asbestos Liability. Howden also reached an agreement with such insurers, effective the same day, addressing asbestos-related bodily injury claims arising from the Products. On October 16, 2012, the Court entered Orders dismissing all claims filed by the Corporation and Air & Liquid, Howden and the eight settling excess insurers against each other in the litigation. The Corporation and Air & Liquid reached three additional settlement agreements in August 2013 with, collectively, three domestic insurers, certain underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, and certain London market insurance companies. As with the agreement effective October 16, 2012, the three additional agreements specify the terms and conditions upon which the insurer parties are to contribute to defense and indemnity costs for claims for Asbestos Liability. One of the Settlement Agreements also provided for the dismissal of claims, without prejudice, regarding two upper-level excess policies issued by one of the insurers. The Court entered Orders dismissing all claims in the action filed against each other by the Corporation and Air & Liquid, on the one hand, and by the settling insurers, on the other. Various counterclaims, cross claims and third party claims have been filed in the litigation and remain pending as to non-settled parties. On September 27, 2013, the Court issued a memorandum opinion and order granting in part and denying in part cross motions for summary judgment filed by the Corporation and Air & Liquid, Howden, and the insurer parties. The Corporation and Air & Liquid remain in the litigation as to two insurer defendants, and continue to evaluate the Court’s September 27, 2013 ruling.

Asbestos Valuations

In 2006, the Corporation retained Hamilton, Rabinovitz & Associates, Inc. (“HR&A”), a nationally recognized expert in the valuation of asbestos liabilities, to assist the Corporation in estimating the potential liability for pending and unasserted future claims for Asbestos Liability. HR&A was not requested to estimate asbestos claims against the inactive subsidiary in dissolution, which the Corporation believes are immaterial. Based on this analysis, the Corporation recorded a reserve for Asbestos Liability claims pending or projected to be asserted through 2013 as at December 31, 2006. HR&A’s analysis has been periodically updated since that time. Most recently, the HR&A analysis was updated in 2012, and additional reserves were established by the Corporation as at December 31, 2012 for Asbestos Liability claims pending or projected to be asserted through 2022. The methodology used by HR&A in its projection in 2012 of the operating subsidiaries’ liability for pending and unasserted potential future claims for Asbestos Liability, which is substantially the same as the methodology employed by HR&A in prior estimates, relied upon and included the following factors:

Using this information, HR&A estimated in 2012 the number of future claims for Asbestos Liability that would be filed through the year 2022, as well as the settlement or indemnity costs that would be incurred to resolve both pending and future unasserted claims through 2022. This methodology has been accepted by numerous courts.

16

Table of Contents

In conjunction with developing the aggregate liability estimate referenced above, the Corporation also developed an estimate of probable insurance recoveries for its Asbestos Liabilities. In developing the estimate, the Corporation considered HR&A’s projection for settlement or indemnity costs for Asbestos Liability and management’s projection of associated defense costs (based on the current defense to indemnity cost ratio), as well as a number of additional factors. These additional factors included the Settlement Agreements then in effect, policy exclusions, policy limits, policy provisions regarding coverage for defense costs, attachment points, prior impairment of policies and gaps in the coverage, policy exhaustions, insolvencies among certain of the insurance carriers, the nature of the underlying claims for Asbestos Liability asserted against the subsidiaries and the Corporation as reflected in the Corporation’s asbestos claims database, and the status of negotiations with insurers not party to the Settlement Agreements, as well as estimated erosion of insurance limits on account of claims against Howden arising out of the Products. In addition to consulting with the Corporation’s outside legal counsel on these insurance matters, the Corporation consulted with a nationally-recognized insurance consulting firm it retained to assist the Corporation with certain policy allocation matters that also are among the several factors considered by the Corporation when analyzing potential recoveries from relevant historical insurance for Asbestos Liabilities. Based upon all of the factors considered by the Corporation, and taking into account the Corporation’s analysis of publicly available information regarding the credit-worthiness of various insurers, the Corporation estimated the probable insurance recoveries for Asbestos Liability and defense costs through 2022. Although the Corporation believes that the assumptions employed in the insurance valuation were reasonable and previously consulted with its outside legal counsel and insurance consultant regarding those assumptions, there are other assumptions that could have been employed that would have resulted in materially lower insurance recovery projections.

Based on the analyses described above, the Corporation’s reserve at December 31, 2012 for the total costs, including defense costs, for Asbestos Liability claims pending or projected to be asserted through 2022 was $181,022, of which approximately 73% was attributable to settlement costs for unasserted claims projected to be filed through 2022 and future defense costs. The reserve at September 30, 2013 was $165,028. While it is reasonably possible that the Corporation will incur additional charges for Asbestos Liability and defense costs in excess of the amounts currently reserved, the Corporation believes that there is too much uncertainty to provide for reasonable estimation of the number of future claims, the nature of such claims and the cost to resolve them beyond 2022. Accordingly, no reserve has been recorded for any costs that may be incurred after 2022.

The Corporation’s receivable at December 31, 2012 for insurance recoveries attributable to the claims for which the Corporation’s Asbestos Liability reserve has been established, including the portion of incurred defense costs covered by the Settlement Agreements in effect through December 31, 2012, and the probable payments and reimbursements relating to the estimated indemnity and defense costs for pending and unasserted future Asbestos Liability claims, was $118,115. The Corporation updated its receivable at September 30, 2013 to take into account the effect of the Settlement Agreements reached in August 2013. The effect of these Settlement Agreements was to increase the Corporation’s receivable for insurance recoveries attributable to claims for which the Corporation’s Asbestos Liability reserve has been established by $16,340.

The following table summarizes activity relating to insurance recoveries.

The insurance receivable recorded by the Corporation does not assume any recovery from insolvent carriers, and a substantial majority of the insurance recoveries deemed probable was from insurance companies rated A – (excellent) or better by A.M. Best Corporation. There can be no assurance, however, that there will not be further insolvencies among the relevant insurance carriers, or that the assumed percentage recoveries for certain carriers will prove correct. The difference between insurance recoveries and projected costs is not due to exhaustion of all insurance coverage for Asbestos Liability. The Corporation and the subsidiaries have substantial additional insurance coverage which the Corporation expects to be available for Asbestos Liability claims and defense costs the subsidiaries and it may incur after 2022. However, this insurance coverage also can be expected to have gaps creating significant shortfalls of insurance recoveries as against claims expense, which could be material in future years.

17

Table of Contents

The amounts recorded by the Corporation for Asbestos Liabilities and insurance receivables rely on assumptions that are based on currently known facts and strategy. The Corporation’s actual expenses or insurance recoveries could be significantly higher or lower than those recorded if assumptions used in the Corporation’s or HR&A’s calculations vary significantly from actual results. Key variables in these assumptions are identified above and include the number and type of new claims to be filed each year, the average cost of disposing of each such new claim, average annual defense costs, the resolution of coverage issues with insurance carriers, and the solvency risk with respect to the relevant insurance carriers. Other factors that may affect the Corporation’s Asbestos Liability and ability to recover under its insurance policies include uncertainties surrounding the litigation process from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and from case to case, reforms that may be made by state and federal courts, and the passage of state or federal tort reform legislation.

The Corporation intends to evaluate its estimated Asbestos Liability and related insurance receivables as well as the underlying assumptions on a regular basis to determine whether any adjustments to the estimates are required. Due to the uncertainties surrounding asbestos litigation and insurance, these regular reviews may result in the Corporation incurring future charges; however, the Corporation is currently unable to estimate such future charges. Adjustments, if any, to the Corporation’s estimate of its recorded Asbestos Liability and/or insurance receivables could be material to operating results for the periods in which the adjustments to the liability or receivable are recorded, and to the Corporation’s liquidity and consolidated financial position.

The Corporation is currently performing certain remedial actions in connection with the sale of real estate previously owned. Environmental exposures are difficult to assess and estimate for numerous reasons including lack of reliable data, the multiplicity of possible solutions, the years of remedial and monitoring activity required, and identification of new sites. In the opinion of management and in consideration of advice from the Corporation’s consultants, the potential liability for all environmental proceedings of approximately $1,030 at September 30, 2013 is considered adequate based on information known to date.

18

Table of Contents

ITEM 2 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

Executive Overview

The Corporation operates in two business segments – Forged and Cast Rolls and Air and Liquid Processing. The Forged and Cast Rolls segment produces and sells forged-hardened steel rolls and cast iron and steel rolls to manufacturers of steel and aluminum throughout the world. The Forged and Cast Rolls segment is being adversely affected by weak demand worldwide and competitive pricing. Lower steel and aluminum production levels of our customers, excess roll inventories in Asia, and the emergence of indigenous roll supply, particularly in China, are contributing to the falloff in demand and a reduction in export business. Margin erosion continues as global pricing pressure remains fierce from both traditional Western suppliers, who are working below capacity, and Chinese, Japanese, and Eastern European roll makers, who are discounting deeply to secure volume. Additionally, management expects a continuation of losses by its Chinese forged roll joint venture company (in which it has a 49% interest and accounts for on the equity method of accounting). While losses to date are largely the result of non-cash expense, if conditions deteriorate or other impairment indicators arise, future earnings of the Corporation may be adversely affected by an impairment charge.

For 2013 to date, while still considered globally weak, demand for rolling mill rolls has recovered modestly including roll requirements for North America customers. Additionally, new mill projects in Asia have helped to offset the effects of lower demand associated with excess roll inventories and emerging indigenous supply in that region. European sales, however, remain generally weak as steel producers rationalize capacity. Competitive pricing pressures continue as most roll producers operate well below capacity.

For the Air and Liquid Processing segment, spending on new construction by the institutional markets remains slow while continued strength in spending on upgrading fossil-fueled utility plants is encouraging.

Consolidated Results of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

Net Sales. Net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were $64,433 and $72,190, respectively, and $203,995 and $215,751, respectively, for the nine months then ended. Backlog approximated $200,108 at September 30, 2013 versus $195,804 as of December 31, 2012 and $216,940 as of September 30, 2012. A discussion of sales and backlog for the Corporation’s two segments is included below.

Costs of Products Sold. Costs of products sold, excluding depreciation, as a percentage of net sales approximated 74.8% and 77.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and 77.7% and 77.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Although margins are lower in the current year, proceeds of $1,505 from an insurance claim relating to lost profit on rolling mill rolls damaged by Hurricane Sandy in 2012 were received in the third quarter of 2013 and were recorded as a reduction to costs of products sold thereby reducing the effect of the lower margins.

Selling and Administrative. The decrease in selling and administrative expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 against the comparable prior year periods is primarily due to ongoing cost containment activities being implemented by each of the segments.

Depreciation. The increase in depreciation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 against the comparable prior year periods is attributable to additional depreciation associated with assets placed in service in the prior year.

Credit for Asbestos Litigation. The credit for asbestos litigation in the third quarter of 2013 represents estimated additional insurance recoveries through 2022 for asbestos liabilities on account of insurance coverage settlement agreements entered into during the quarter.

Income from Operations. Income from operations for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 approximated $20,777 and $3,748, respectively, and $24,879 and $10,793, respectively, for the nine months then ended. A discussion of operating results for the Corporation’s two segments is included below.

Forged and Cast Rolls. Net sales declined for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 when compared to the same periods of the prior year primarily due to lower selling prices which adversely impacted operating income by approximately $2,900 and $9,200, respectively. A higher volume of shipments offset the effect of lower pricing by approximately $800 and $3,800 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. Additionally, receipt of $1,505 of insurance proceeds for lost margin on in-transit inventory damaged by Hurricane Sandy and improved quality resulting in a reduction of warranty-related provisions further benefited operating income for each of the current year periods. Backlog approximated $161,267 at September 30, 2013 against $154,527 as of December 31, 2012 and $170,195 as of September 30, 2012. Approximately $112,020 of the current backlog is expected to ship after 2013.

19

Table of Contents

Air and Liquid Processing. Sales for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 were less than the comparable prior year periods; however, operating income improved due to the Credit for Asbestos Litigation of $16,340 representing estimated additional insurance recoveries through 2022 for asbestos liabilities on account of insurance coverage settlement agreements entered into during the quarter. For Buffalo Pumps, sales and operating income improved for each of the current year periods due to a higher volume of shipments to U.S. Navy shipbuilders. For Aerofin, sales decreased for each of the current year periods; however, operating income improved primarily due to changes in product mix. For Buffalo Air Handling, sales and operating results were less than the comparable prior year periods principally due to a weak construction market. Additionally, the prior year-to-date period includes the balance of a large order for a customer in medical research. Backlog approximated $38,841 at September 30, 2013 against $41,277 as of December 31, 2012 and $46,745 as of September 30, 2012. Approximately $12,788 of the current backlog is expected to ship after 2013.

Other Income (Expense). The fluctuation is primarily attributable to fluctuations in foreign exchange gains and losses.

Income Taxes. The effective income tax rates for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 are relatively comparable. Changes in the effective income tax rate include the impact of differences in permanent items, state income taxes, uncertain tax positions and the mix of income, none of which were individually significant in the periods. The income tax provision for an interim period is computed as the difference between the estimated tax provision for the year and the amounts reported for previous interim periods. Accordingly, the effective tax rate from quarter-to-quarter or between a quarter and the comparable prior year quarter includes an adjustment necessary to record the year-to-date tax provision at the estimated annual effective tax rate for that year.

Net Income and Earnings per Common Share. As a result of the above, the Corporation’s net income for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 equaled $12,705 or $1.23 per common share and $1,528 or $0.15 per common share, respectively, and $13,937 or $1.35 per common share and $5,037 or $0.49 per common share, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Net cash flows provided by operating activities increased for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 when compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012 by $14,479. The improvement is primarily attributable to (1) a greater reduction in accounts receivable from December 31, 2012 to September 30, 2013 versus December 31, 2011 to September 30, 2012 associated with lower sales which provided additional cash flows of approximately $2,500, (2) less of an investment in inventories which favorably impacted cash flows by roughly $7,700 and (3) an increase in accounts payable which provided approximately $4,300 of additional cash flows. While the credit for asbestos litigation recorded in the current year improved earnings, it did not impact cash flows by the same amount. Instead, the additional insurance coverage principally will reduce future payments required by the Corporation’s Air & Liquid System’s subsidiary. Net asbestos-related payments equaled $3,712 and $6,609 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. During 2013, voluntary contributions to employee benefit plans equaled $5,000. No voluntary contributions were made is 2012.

Net cash flows used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 were higher than September 30, 2012 due to an increased level of capital expenditures for the Forged and Cast Rolls segment. For 2012, proceeds from a government grant offset a portion of the capital expenditures by the U.K. operations. As of September 30, 2013, future capital expenditures approximating $8,500, to be spent over the next 12-15 months, have been approved and approximately $275 (£170) of the government grant remains available for reimbursement of qualifying purchases.

Net cash flows used in financing activities were comparable for each of the periods and represented primarily payment of dividends.