Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2017 June (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended: June 30, 2017

or

For the transition period from                      to                      

Commission File No. 001-35182

AMPIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

373 Inverness Parkway, Suite 200

Englewood, Colorado 80112

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(720) 437-6500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12B-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes   ¨    No   x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Emerging growth company     ¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.    ¨

As of August 2, 2017, there were 68,232,409 shares of Common Stock outstanding, par value $0.0001, of the registrant.  

AMPIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2017

INDEX

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains statements reflecting assumptions, expectations, projections, intentions or beliefs about future events that are intended as “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements included or incorporated by reference in this report, other than statements of historical fact, that address activities, events or developments that we expect, believe or anticipate will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. These statements appear in a number of places, including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” These statements represent our reasonable judgment of the future based on various factors and using numerous assumptions and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results and financial position to differ materially from those contemplated by the statements. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts, and use words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “may,” “should,” “plan,” “project” and other words of similar meaning. In particular, these include, but are not limited to, statements relating to the following:

Any or all of our forward-looking statements may turn out to be wrong. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions or by known or unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors including, among others:

In addition, there may be other factors that could cause our actual results to be materially different from the results referenced in the forward-looking statements, some of which are included elsewhere in this report, including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Many of these factors will be important in determining our actual future results. Consequently, no forward-looking statement can be guaranteed. Our actual future results may vary materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements contained in this report are qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report, except as otherwise required by applicable law.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes trademarks, such as Ampion and Optina, which are protected under applicable intellectual property laws and are our property. Solely for convenience, our trademarks and trade names referred to in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may appear without the ^® or ^TM symbols, but such references are not intended to indicate in any way that we will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights to these trademarks and trade names.

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

AMPIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

Balance Sheets

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.  

AMPIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

Statements of Operations

(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

AMPIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

AMPIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.  

AMPIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

Notes to Financial Statements

(unaudited)

Note 1—Basis of Presentation

These unaudited financial statements represent the financial statements of Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Ampio” or “the Company”). These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with Ampio’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, which included all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). In the opinion of management, these unaudited financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position of Ampio for the balance sheet and the results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the period ended June 30, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of expected operating results for the full year. The information presented throughout this report as of and for the period ended June 30, 2017 is unaudited.

Ampio is a biopharmaceutical company focused on primarily developing compounds that decrease inflammation by (i) inhibiting specific pro-inflammatory compounds by affecting specific pathways at the protein expression and at the transcription level; (ii) activating specific phosphatase or depleting available phosphate needed for the inflammation process; and (iii) decreasing vascular permeability.

Ampio’s activities have been primarily related to research and development and raising capital and have not generated revenue to date.

Adoption of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-09, “Compensation –Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share Based Payment Accounting”. The standard includes multiple provisions intended to simplify various aspects of the accounting for share based payments. The amendments are expected to significantly impact net income, earnings per share, and the statement of cash flows. Implementation and administration may present challenges to companies with significant share based payment activities. These amendments were effective for public entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period, with any adjustments reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 in the first quarter of 2017. The Company elected to recognize forfeitures as they occur rather than estimating the forfeiture rate on the option grant date. The cumulative-effect of the change was $18,000 which was charged to retained earnings during the first quarter.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”. The new standard establishes a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of its pending adoption of this standard on its financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting”. The amendments provide guidance on determining which changes to the terms and conditions of share-based payment awards require an entity to apply modification accounting under Topic 718. The new standard is for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of its pending adoption of this standard on its financial statements.

Note 2 – Going Concern

As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company had cash of $4.9 million as of June 30, 2017 with a net loss of $4.5 million for the period ended June 30, 2017. The Company used net cash in operations of $5.7 million for the period ended June 30, 2017. The Company ended the quarter with stockholders’ equity of $3.7 million and an accumulated deficit of $158.0 million.  In addition, the Company is a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company and has not generated any revenues or profits to date. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company expects that its current cash resources and expected lack of operating cash flows will not be sufficient to sustain operations for a period greater than a few months from the date this Form 10-Q was available for issuance. The ability of the Company to continue its operations is dependent on management's plans, which include continuing to raise equity-based and debt financing. The Company is currently in negotiation with potential investors for financing. However, there is no assurance that the Company will be successful in raising sufficient capital.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. These financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of the recorded assets or the classification of the liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Note 3—Fixed Assets

Fixed assets are recorded at cost and, once placed in service, are depreciated on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives. Fixed assets consist of the following:

Note 4 – Trading Security Aytu BioScience, Inc.

On January 4, 2016, Ampio completed the spin-off of Aytu BioScience, Inc. (“Aytu”) by distributing a majority of its shares of common stock of Aytu to the Ampio shareholders on a pro rata basis. This transaction changed Ampio’s ownership from 81.5% to 8.6% of Aytu’s outstanding shares on that date. Due to this transaction, the financial statements of Aytu were deconsolidated in the beginning of 2016. In May 2016, Aytu completed an offering which was dilutive to the Aytu shares held by Ampio. In the beginning of July 2016, Aytu added a fifth Board member. Ampio had significant influence over Aytu subsequent to the spin-off through June 30, 2016 due to the fact that Ampio’s Chief Executive Officer was one of three and one of four Aytu Board members.

In July 2016, the Company determined that Ampio’s influence was no longer significant over Aytu’s Board of Directors. Ampio reclassified its remaining investment in Aytu to a trading security in July of 2016. The Aytu security is recorded at fair value on the accompanying balance sheet with the change in fair value recorded as an unrealized loss on the statement of operations. As of June 30, 2017, Ampio’s ownership in Aytu’s outstanding shares was less than 1.0%.

Note 5 – Fair Value Considerations

The Company’s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, trading security in Aytu, accounts payable and accrued expenses, and warrant derivative liability. The valuation policies are determined by the Chief Financial Officer and approved by the Company’s Board of Directors.

Authoritative guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The guidance establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources independent of Ampio. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available in the circumstances. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on reliability of the inputs as follows:

Ampio’s assets and liabilities which are measured at fair value are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to their fair value measurement. Ampio’s policy is to recognize transfers in and/or out of fair value hierarchy as of the date in which the event or change in circumstances caused the transfer. Ampio has consistently applied the valuation techniques discussed below in all periods presented.

The following table presents Ampio’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, by level within the fair value hierarchy:

The estimated fair value of the Company’s investment, the trading security in Aytu is recorded at fair value which represents Ampio’s ownership shares in Aytu of 102,201 multiplied by Aytu’s closing stock price on June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, which is classified as Level 1 (quoted price is available).

The warrant derivative liability was valued using the Black-Scholes valuation methodology because that model embodies all the relevant assumptions that address the features underlying these instruments. Significant assumptions in valuing the warrant derivative liability are based on estimates of the value of Ampio’s common stock and various factors regarding the warrants. These assumptions were as follows as of June 30, 2017 and at issuance:

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the fair value of financial liabilities classified as Level 3 in the fair valued hierarchy:

Note 6—Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments and contingencies are described below and summarized by the following table:

Ampion Supply Agreement

In October 2013, Ampio entered into a human serum albumin ingredient and purchase sale agreement which has a remaining commitment of $7.5 million. Per an amendment to the original agreement, Ampio was not committed to purchase any product in 2016 and has extended the agreement to 2019.

Clinical Research and Trial Obligations

As of June 30, 2017, Ampio has committed to $2,795,000 on a contract related to the current clinical trial of Ampion.

Facility Lease

On December 13, 2013, Ampio entered into a 125-month non-cancellable operating lease for new office space and the manufacturing facility effective May 1, 2014. The lease has initial base rent of $23,000 per month, with the total base rent over the term of the lease of approximately $3.3 million and includes rent abatements and leasehold incentives. The Company recognizes rental expense of the facility on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Differences between the straight-line net expenses on rent payments are classified as liabilities between current deferred rent and long-term deferred rent.

Rent expense for the respective periods is as follows:

Note 7—Common Stock

Capital Stock

At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, Ampio had 68,232,409 and 57,179,686 shares of common shares outstanding, respectively. As of these same dates, Ampio had no preferred shares outstanding. Ampio has 100.0 million shares of common stock authorized with a par value of $0.0001 per share and 10.0 million shares of preferred stock authorized with a par value of $0.0001 per share.

Shelf Registration

In March 2017, Ampio filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to register Ampio common stock and warrants in an aggregate amount of up to $100.0 million for offerings from time to time, as well as 5.0 million shares of common stock available for sale by selling shareholders. The shelf registration was declared effective in April 2017 by the SEC. As a result of equity raises, approximately $85.1 million remained available under the Form S-3 as of June 30, 2017. This shelf registration statement on Form S-3 expires in March of 2020.

Until the Company has a market cap of $75.0 million exclusive of stock held by affiliates, the Company may only sell up to $18.6 million of securities in a 12-month period under the Form S-3.

Registered Direct Offering

In June 2017, the Company completed a registered direct offering. In this offering, we issued directly to multiple investors approximately 11.0 million shares of its common stock and approximately 11.0 million warrants to purchase shares of common stock. The common stock and warrants were sold in units, with each unit consisting of one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase one share of common stock. Each unit was sold to the investor in this offering at a negotiated price of $0.60 per unit generating gross proceeds of $6.6 million. The shares and the warrants were offered and sold pursuant to the Company’s shelf registration statement on Form S-3 that was declared effective by the SEC in April 2017.

The investor warrants have an exercise price of $0.76 per share and are exercisable starting on December 7, 2017 with a term of five years from issuance. The investor warrants include a provision where the warrant holder has the contractual right to request a cash exercise even if the effectiveness of the registration statement is not maintained, but securities law would prevent the Company from issuing registered shares in a cash exercise. Therefore, the Company presumably could be forced to cash settle the warrant. Based on this additional derivative feature of the investor warrants, they must be accounted for as a liability at fair value under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815 “Derivatives and Hedging”. On the date of issuance, these warrants were valued at $4.6 million.

In connection with the offering, the placement agent received an 8% commission totaling $533,000 and approximately 879,000 warrants with an exercise price of $0.76 and a termination date of June 1, 2022. These warrants had a value of $369,000 when they were issued and are accounted for as equity based warrants. The Company also incurred expenses related to legal, accounting, and other registration cost of $292,000.

In September 2016, the Company completed a registered direct offering. In this offering, the Company issued directly to an institutional investor 5.0 million shares of its common stock and warrants to purchase up to 5.0 million shares of common stock. The common stock and warrants were sold in units, with each unit consisting of one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase one share of common stock. Each unit was sold to the investor in this offering at a negotiated price of $0.75 per unit generating gross proceeds of $3.75 million. The shares and the warrants were offered and sold pursuant to the Company’s December 2013 shelf registration statement on Form S-3.

The investor warrants had an exercise price of $1.00 per share and are immediately exercisable with a term of five years from issuance. In addition, the investor warrants included provisions for the adjustment to the exercise price upon subsequent issuances of common stock by the Company at a price less than the warrant exercise price and the investor was entitled to purchase additional shares, such that the aggregate purchase price of $5.0 million for the warrant shares would remain unchanged. The investor warrants also include a provision for cash redemption at the Black-Scholes value upon the request of the holder upon a change of control. Based on these additional derivative features of the investor warrants, they must be accounted for as a liability at fair value under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 480 “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity”. On the date of issuance, these warrants were valued at $4.1 million.

In connection with the offering the placement agent received a 6% commission totaling $225,000 and 150,000 warrants with an exercise price of $0.9375 and a termination date of September 1, 2021. These warrants had a value of $89,000 when they were issued and are accounted for as equity based warrants. The Company also incurred expenses related to legal, accounting, and other registration cost of $113,000.

The Company’s net cash proceeds for the registered direct offering were $3.4 million. The additional non-cash charges of $4.2 million related to the 5.0 million investor warrants and the 150,000 placement agent warrants were offset against the net cash transaction proceeds which exceeded 100% of the proceeds requiring the Company to take the additional cost above the transaction proceeds and recognize them as a loss on the day it entered the transaction. The loss on the transaction was $804,000 and was included in derivative expense on the statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016.

On March 27, 2017, the Company entered into a Waiver and Consent Letter Agreement (the “Waiver and Consent Agreement”) with the investor, amending the terms of warrants previously issued to the investor in September 2016. Under the Waiver and Consent Agreement, the investor waived the right to have the warrant exercise price reduced and the number of shares of common stock underlying the warrant increased in the event the Company secures any financing, including debt, which includes issuing or selling shares of common stock for a price per share less than the warrant exercise price. The investor also waived the prohibition on the Company’s ability to issue or sell shares of its common stock, options or convertible securities at a price which varies or may vary with the market price of the common stock or pursuant to an equity credit line or similar “at-the-market” offering. The waivers are permanent. In return, the Company agreed to reduce the exercise price of the warrants from $1.00 to $0.40 and to not issue or sell any shares of its capital stock for a period of 10 trading days following the execution of the Waiver and Consent Agreement. All other terms of the warrants remained the same. Based upon the amendment to this warrant agreement, the company recognized a non-cash derivative gain of $1.1 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2017.

Controlled Equity Offering

In February 2016, Ampio entered into a Controlled Equity Offering ^SM Sales Agreement (the “Agreement”) with a placement agent to implement an “at-the-market” equity program under which Ampio from time to time may offer and sell shares of its common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $25.0 million through the placement agent. The Company has no obligation to sell any of the shares and may at any time suspend sales under the Agreement or terminate the Agreement in accordance with its terms. The Company has provided the placement agent with customary indemnification rights. The placement agent will be entitled to a fixed commission of 3.0% of the gross proceeds from shares sold.

The following table summarizes Ampio’s total sales under the Agreement for the period indicated:

No shares were sold under the Agreement in the six months ended June 30, 2017.

Common Stock Issued for Services

Ampio issued 62,478 and 18,126 shares of common stock valued at $60,000 and $60,000, respectively, for non-employee directors as part of their director fees for fiscal years 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Note 8—Equity Instruments

Options

In 2010, Ampio shareholders approved the adoption of a stock and option award plan (the “2010 Plan”), under which shares were reserved for future issuance under restricted stock awards, options, and other equity awards. The 2010 Plan permits grants of equity awards to employees, directors and consultants. The shareholders have approved a total of 11.7 million shares reserved for issuance under the 2010 Plan.

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company granted 685,000 options at a weighted average exercise price of $0.82 to officers, directors and employees. Of the options granted, 58,000 options vested immediately while 627,000 vest over a one to three-year period. 

Ampio stock option activity is as follows:

Stock options outstanding at June 30, 2017 are summarized in the table below:

Ampio has computed the fair value of all options granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. To calculate the fair value of the options, certain assumptions are made regarding components of the model, including the estimated fair value of the underlying common stock, risk-free interest rate, volatility, expected dividend yield and expected option life. Changes to the assumptions could cause significant adjustments to valuation. Ampio calculates its volatility assumption using the actual changes in the market value of our stock. Ampio adopted ASU 2016-09 in 2017 and no longer estimates a forfeiture rate. Instead, forfeitures are recognized as they occur. Ampio estimates the expected term based on the average of the vesting term and the contractual term of the options. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield in effect at the time of the grant for treasury securities of similar maturity. Accordingly, Ampio has computed the fair value of all options granted during the period ending June 30, 2017, using the following assumptions:

Stock-based compensation expense related to the fair value of stock options was included in the statements of operations as research and development expenses or selling, general and administrative expenses as set forth in the table below. The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:

Warrants

Ampio has issued warrants in conjunction with private and public offerings. A summary of all Ampio warrants is as follows:

In connection with the June 2017 registered direct offering, Ampio issued to investors warrants to purchase an aggregate of approximately 11 million shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.76 and a term of five years. These warrants, due to certain derivative features, are accounted for under liability accounting and are fair valued at each reporting period. At June 30, 2017, these warrants had a fair value of $3,720,000 (see Note 5).

In the 2016 registered direct offering, Ampio issued to an investor warrants to purchase an aggregate of 5,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 and a term of five years. These warrants due to certain derivative features are accounted for under liability accounting and are fair valued at each reporting period. At June 30, 2017, these warrants had a fair value of $1,897,000.

The combined value for the warrant liability at June 30, 2017 is $5,617,000 (see Note 5).

During the 2017 registered direct offering, Ampio issued placement agent warrants to purchase an aggregate of approximately 879,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.76 with a term of five years. These warrants are accounted for as equity based awards (see Note 7). They were valued using the Black-Scholes methodology. Significant assumptions were as follows:

In the 2016 registered direct offering, Ampio issued to the placement agent warrants to purchase an aggregate of 150,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.9375 with a term of five years. These warrants are accounted for as equity based awards (see Note 7). They were valued using the Black-Scholes methodology. 

In March 2017, the Company modified 498,576 of its outstanding warrants which extended the expiration until June 30, 2018. The $75,000 additional expense related to this modification was recognized in the quarter ended March 31, 2017.

In March 2017, the Company modified the five million warrants issued in conjunction with the Company’s September 2016 registered direct offering with an original strike price of $1.00 down to $0.40. The $1.1 million gain related to this modification was recognized in the quarter ended March 31, 2017 (see Note 7).

Note 9—Related Party Transactions

Sponsored Research Agreement

Ampio entered into a sponsored research agreement with Trauma Research LLC, an entity controlled by Ampio’s Director and Chief Scientific Officer, Dr. Bar-Or, in September 2009, which had been amended seven times with the last amendment occurring in June 2017. Under the amended terms, the agreement was terminated effective July 5, 2017. The remaining prepaid of $252,000 was expensed during the quarter ended June 30, 2017. In conjunction with terminating this agreement, the Company extended the contract for Dr. Bar-Or for an additional year. He will continue his current roles as the Chief Scientific Officer and a director.

Service Agreement

In June 2017, Ampio terminated the shared services agreement with Aytu. As of June 30, 2017, Aytu owed Ampio $65,000 under this agreement. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the total shared overhead cost was $104,000 and $131,000, respectively.

Note 10—Litigation

 As previously disclosed, on May 8, 2015 and May 14, 2015, purported stockholders of the Company brought two putative class action lawsuits in the United States District Court in the Central District of California, Napoli v. Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Case No. 2:15-cv-03474-TJH and Stein v. Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Case No. 2:15-cv-03640-TJH (the “Securities Class Actions”), alleging that Ampio and certain of its current and former officers violated federal securities laws by misrepresenting and/or omitting information regarding the STEP study. The cases were consolidated, and on February 8, 2016, the plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) and Rule 10b-5 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Sections 11 and 15 under the Securities Act of 1933 on behalf of a putative class of purchasers of common stock from January 13, 2014 through August 21, 2014, including purchasers in the Company’s offering on February 28, 2014. On September 27, 2016, plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint, alleging the same claims set forth in the consolidated amended complaint during the same class period. On or about November 8, 2016, the parties reached an agreement in principle on a comprehensive settlement of all claims asserted in the lawsuit with no admission of liability by any defendants and with any settlement amounts being funded by insurance. On April 6, 2017, the Court preliminarily approved the settlement and set a final settlement approval hearing for August 28, 2017. The settlement, which provides for dismissal of all claims with prejudice, is subject to final approval by the Court. Upon final approval by the Court, all claims will be dismissed with prejudice with no admission or finding of any liability or wrongdoing by the defendants.

On August 6, 2015 and September 25, 2015, purported stockholders of the Company brought derivative actions in the United States District Court in the Central District of California, Oglina v. Macaluso et al., Case No. 2:15-cv-05970-TJH-PJW (“Oglina action”) and the Colorado state court in Denver, Loyd v. Giles et al., Case No. 2015CV33429 (“Loyd action”), alleging primarily that the directors and officers of Ampio breached their fiduciary duties because of their alleged misstatements and/or omissions regarding the STEP study. On or about March 24, 2017, the parties reached an agreement in principle on a comprehensive settlement of all claims asserted in both the Oglina action and the Loyd action. On June 26, 2017, the settlement was finally approved by the Court and the Oglina action was dismissed with prejudice with no admission or finding of any liability or wrongdoing by the defendants. On June 28, 2017, the Loyd action was also dismissed with prejudice with no admission or finding of any liability or wrongdoing by the defendants.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This discussion should be read in conjunction with our historical financial statements. The following discussion and analysis contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. For additional information regarding these risks and uncertainties, please see Part II, Item 1A of this Form 10-Q, “Risk Factors,” and the risk factors included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 16, 2017.

Overview

We maintain an Internet website at www.ampiopharma.com. Information on or linked to our website is not incorporated by reference into this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Filings with the SEC can also be obtained at the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov.

We are a biopharmaceutical company focused primarily on developing compounds that decrease inflammation by (i) inhibiting specific pro-inflammatory compounds by affecting specific pathways at the protein expression and at the transcription level; (ii) activating specific phosphatase or depleting available phosphate needed for the inflammation process; and (iii) decreasing vascular permeability.

Product Update

We continue to execute our business plan and advance our main drug candidates.

AMPION

Ampion for Osteoarthritis and Other Inflammatory Conditions

Ampion is the < 5 kDa ultrafiltrate of 5% Human Serum Albumin, or HSA, an approved biologic product. Ampion is a non-steroidal, low molecular weight, anti-inflammatory biologic, which has the potential to be used in a wide variety of acute and chronic inflammatory conditions, as well as immune-mediated diseases. We are currently developing Ampion as an intra-articular injection to treat pain due to severe osteoarthritis of the knee.

Ampion and its known components have demonstrated a broad spectrum of anti-inflammatory and immune modulatory activity which support the mechanism of action. We have published several scientific papers on Ampion, including several peer-reviewed publications.

We have completed seven trials related to Ampion and have begun a pivotal phase three trial for this product.

Clinical Development Pathway

In September and December 2016, we met with the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, or CBER, Division of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, to seek guidance on the best path forward to obtain a Biological License Application, or BLA, for Ampion™ to treat patients suffering from pain caused by severe osteoarthritis of the knee. As a result of these meetings, we continued our discussions with the FDA into the first quarter of fiscal 2017 while analyzing the best way to proceed towards filing our BLA for Ampion. Based on guidance from the FDA, we will conduct another Ampion trial that will be smaller than our prior trials with 171 patients, randomization of 6 to 1 (Ampion™/Saline) on patients with severe osteoarthritis of the knee, defined radiologically as KL 4 patients. The 6-1 randomization will preserve blinding and prevent the bias in the assessment that might be associated with an unblinded evaluation; however, only Ampion™ treated patients will be evaluated. This 12-week study will evaluate the responder rate of Ampion™ treated patients as defined by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (“OARSI”), which includes pain, function, and patient global assessment. The outcome of this study will contribute to the label of Ampion™ which may include pain, function, and patient global assessment. Using the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clincal Trials (“OMERACT”) OMERACT-OARSI responder rate definition and the analysis proposed in this protocol, all previous Ampion™ single injections clinical trials would have successfully met this endpoint.  We believe this trial can be completed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017. If the trial is successful, we plan to file the BLA thereafter, pending any partnership discussions.

We also intend to study Ampion for therapeutic applications outside of osteoarthritis of the knee and hand. We may engage development partners to study Ampion in various conditions including: (i) acute and chronic inflammatory conditions; (ii) degenerative joint diseases; and (iii) respiratory disorders. Based on the continuing evaluation, we are also studying Ampion’s effects on cellular behavior to indicate potential effects on disease modification across multiple conditions. If successful, we believe these additional formulations and potential therapeutic indications will supplement the Ampion clinical portfolio, and will enable clinical applications in large therapeutic markets where there are significant unmet needs.

OPTINA

Optina for Diabetic Macular Edema

Optina is a low-dose formulation of danazol that we are developing to treat diabetic macular edema, or DME. Danazol is a synthetic derivative of modified testosterone ethisterone, and we believe it affects vascular endothelial cell linkage in a biphasic manner. At low doses, danazol decreases vascular permeability by increasing the barrier function of endothelial cells. The lipophilic low-molecular-weight weak androgen has the potential to treat multiple angiopathies. Steroid hormones control a variety of functions through slow genomic and rapid non-genomic mechanisms. Danazol immediately increases intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate through the rapid activation of membrane-associated androgen, steroid binding globulin, and calcium channel receptors. At lower concentrations, such as Optina, danazol binds to androgen and steroid binding globulin receptors stimulating the formation of a cortical actin ring. At higher concentrations, activation of the calcium channels shifts the balance towards stress fiber formation and increases vascular permeability. 

When organized into a cortical ring, filamentous actin, or f-actin, increases the barrier function of endothelial cells by tethering adhesion molecule complexes to the cytoskeleton. In this orientation, increased cortical actin improves tight junctions which strengthen cell-to-cell adhesions. Formation of the cortical actin ring thereby restricts leakage across the cell membrane.

We have completed two clinical trials of Optina and met with the Division of the Transplant and Ophthalmology Products of the FDA in late 2015 to discuss the results of the OptimEyes clinical trial of Optina and to seek guidance on the next steps to approval. The guidance from the FDA was that we perform a confirmatory study on patients with DME who are refractory to the currently available drugs, which if successful, would qualify Optina as a rescue medication for patients who have no treatment options (failed available therapies). 

The FDA has indicated that, for §505(b)(2) NDAs, complete studies of the safety and effectiveness of a candidate product may not be necessary if appropriate bridging studies provide an adequate basis for reliance upon the FDA’s findings of safety and effectiveness for a previously approved product.

Recent Financing Activities

In June 2017, we completed a registered direct offering. In this offering, we issued directly to multiple investors approximately 11.0 million shares of our common stock and approximately 11.0 million warrants to purchase shares of common stock. The common stock and warrants were sold in units, with each unit consisting of one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase one share of common stock. Each unit was sold to the investor in this offering at a negotiated price of $0.60 per unit generating gross proceeds of $6.6 million. The shares and the warrants were offered and sold pursuant to our shelf registration statement on Form S-3 that was declared effective by the SEC in April 2017.

The investor warrants have an exercise price of $0.76 per share and are exercisable starting on December 7, 2017 with a term of five years from issuance. The investor warrants include a provision where the warrant holder has the contractual right to request a cash exercise even if the effectiveness of the registration statement is not maintained, but securities law would prevent us from issuing registered shares in a cash exercise. Therefore, we presumably could be forced to cash settle the warrant. Based on this additional derivative feature of the investor warrants, they must be accounted for as a liability at fair value under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815 “Derivatives and Hedging”. On the date of issuance, these warrants were valued at $4.6 million.

In connection with the offering, the placement agent received an 8% commission totaling $533,000 and approximately 879,000 warrants with an exercise price of $0.76 and a termination date of June 1, 2022. These warrants had a value of $369,000 when they were issued and are accounted for as equity based warrants. We also incurred expenses related to legal, accounting, and other registration cost of $292,000.

In September 2016, we completed a registered direct offering. In this offering, we issued directly to an institutional investor 5.0 million shares of our common stock and warrants to purchase up to 5.0 million shares of common stock. The common stock and warrants were sold in units, with each unit consisting of one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase one share of common stock. Each unit was sold to the investor in this offering at a negotiated price of $0.75 per unit generating gross proceeds of $3.75 million. The shares and the warrants were offered and sold pursuant to our December 2013 shelf registration statement on Form S-3.

The investor warrants had an exercise price of $1.00 per share and are immediately exercisable with a term of five years from issuance. In addition, the investor warrants included provisions for the adjustment to the exercise price upon subsequent issuances of our common stock at a price less than the warrant exercise price and the investor was entitled to purchase additional shares, such that the aggregate purchase price of $5.0 million for the warrant shares would remain unchanged. The investor warrants also include a provision for cash redemption at the Black-Scholes value upon the request of the holder upon a change of control. Based on these additional derivative features of the investor warrants, they must be accounted for as a liability at fair value under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 480 “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity”. On the date of issuance, these warrants were valued at $4.1 million.

In connection with the offering the placement agent received a 6% commission totaling $225,000 and 150,000 warrants with an exercise price of $0.9375 and a termination date of September 1, 2021. These warrants had a value of $89,000 when they were issued and are accounted for as equity based warrants. We also incurred expenses related to legal, accounting, and other registration cost of $113,000.

Our net cash proceeds for the registered direct offering were $3.4 million. The additional non-cash charges of $4.2 million related to the 5.0 million investor warrants and the 150,000 placement agent warrants were offset against the net cash transaction proceeds which exceeded 100% of the proceeds requiring us to take the additional cost above the transaction proceeds and recognize them as a loss on the day we entered the transaction. The loss on the transaction was $804,000 and was included in derivative expense on the statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016.

The Board of Directors determined that this transaction that generated net cash proceeds of $3.4 million was in our best interest as we had less than six months of cash based on our current burn rate when the transaction was completed. They believed this capital raise would give us time to advance our clinical trial efforts in the absence of more favorable alternative sources of financing.

On March 27, 2017, we entered into a Waiver and Consent Letter Agreement, or the Waiver and Consent Agreement, with the investor, amending the terms of warrants previously issued to the investor in September 2016. Under the Waiver and Consent Agreement, the investor waived the right to have the warrant exercise price reduced and the number of shares of common stock underlying the warrant increased in the event we secure any financing, including debt, which includes issuing or selling shares of common stock for a price per share less than the warrant exercise price. The investor also waived the prohibition on our ability to issue or sell shares of our common stock, options or convertible securities at a price which varies or may vary with the market price of the common stock or pursuant to an equity credit line or similar “at-the-market” offering. The waivers are permanent. In return, we agreed to reduce the exercise price of the warrants from $1.00 to $0.40 and to not issue or sell any shares of our capital stock for a period of 10 trading days following the execution of the Waiver and Consent Agreement. All other terms of the warrants remained the same. Based upon the amendment to this warrant agreement, we recognized a non-cash derivative gain of $1.1 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2017.

We also have access to a controlled equity offering which we used to generate $153,000 of gross proceeds by selling 163,254 common shares in August 2016. The placement agent received a fixed commission of 3.0% of the gross proceeds from the shares sold. We could use the controlled equity offering to generate additional funding in the near future.

We did not use the controlled equity offering in the six months ended June 30, 2017.

Known Trends or Future Events; Outlook

We are a clinical stage company that has not generated revenues and have therefore incurred significant net losses totaling $158.0 million since our inception in December 2008. We expect to generate operating losses for the foreseeable future, but intend to try to limit the extent of these losses by entering into co-development or collaboration agreements with one or more strategic partners. As of June 30, 2017, we had $4.9 million of cash which we expect can fund our operation through the next few months from the issuance date of this report. To operate as planned in fiscal 2017 and into 2018, we will need to raise at least $4.0 million through equity offerings, debt, partnering/licensing transactions or other financing tools. If we are unable to maintain a stockholder’s equity balance of over $6.0 million, we will fall below the continued listing standard of the NYSE MKT Company Guide.

Although we have raised capital with net proceeds of over $100 million in the past five years through the sale of common stock and warrants, we cannot assure you that we will be able to secure such additional financing or that it will be adequate to execute our business strategy. Even if we obtain additional financing, it may be costly and may require us to agree to covenants or other provisions that will favor new investors over existing shareholders.

Our primary focus for the remainder of fiscal 2017 is raising additional capital and advancing the clinical development and BLA preparation of our core asset, Ampion.

ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of the financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to recoverability of long-lived assets, valuation allowance, useful lives of assets, accrued compensation, stock compensation, the valuation of the Aytu BioScience investment and warrant derivative liability. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The methods, estimates, and judgments used by us in applying these most critical accounting policies have a significant impact on the results we report in our financial statements. Our significant accounting policies and estimates are included in our 2016 Annual Report reported on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 16, 2017.

Newly Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Information regarding the recently issued accounting standards (adopted and not adopted as of June 30, 2017) is contained in Note 1 to the Financial Statements.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Results of Operations—June 30, 2017 Compared to June 30, 2016

Results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2017, or the “2017 quarter,” and the three months ended June 30, 2016, or the “2016 quarter,” reflected net losses from continuing operations of approximately $2.6 million and $5.1 million, respectively. These losses include non-cash items of loss equity investment, unrealized loss on trading security, stock-based compensation, depreciation and amortization, amortization of prepaid research and development - related party and common stock issued for services. In the 2017 quarter, there was a $2.1 million non-cash gain on the warrant derivative which decreased our loss. The related party cost increased in the 2017 quarter by $252,000 as our sponsored research agreement with Trauma Research LLC, or the Trauma Research Agreement, was terminated in June 2017 resulting in acceleration of prepaid expense amortization.

Results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2017, or the “2017 period,” and the six months ended June 30, 2016, or the “2016 period,” reflected net losses from continuing operations of approximately $4.5 million and $11.8 million, respectively. These losses include non-cash items of loss equity investment, unrealized loss on trading security, stock-based compensation, depreciation and amortization, amortization of prepaid research and development - related party and common stock issued for services. In the 2017 period, there was a $3.2 million non-cash gain on the warrant derivative which decreased our loss. The related party cost increased for the six months ended June 30, 2017 by $252,000 as the Trauma Research Agreement was terminated in June 2017 resulting in acceleration of prepaid expense amortization.

Operating Expenses

Research and Development

Research and development costs are summarized as follows:

Research and development costs consist of clinical trials and sponsored research, labor, consultants and other, stock-based compensation and sponsored research – related party. Research and development expense increased $553,000, or 19.7%, for the 2017 quarter compared to the 2016 quarter. The increase is primarily due to clinical trials and sponsored research expense. The clinical trials expense is larger than the same quarter last year as we initiated our current trial during the 2017 quarter. The increase in sponsored research-related party was the result of terminating the Trauma Research Agreement.

Research and development expense decreased $2.1 million, or 29.8%, for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. Clinical trial and sponsor research cost was $1.9 million higher in the 2016 period compared to the 2017 period because we were conducting a trial during the first and second quarters of 2016. In 2017, the trial was started at the end of the second quarter. During the second half of 2017, we expect our clinical trial expense to continue to increase as we conduct a new Ampion trial and prepare to file the BLA with the FDA.

General and Administrative

General and administrative costs are summarized as follows:

General and administrative costs decreased $222,000, or 14.2%, for the quarter ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same quarter in 2016. The decrease in stock-based compensation is the result of fewer option awards being granted at lower strike prices over the past few years. Labor cost has decreased in 2017 because of a reduction in headcount. Patent costs have decreased due to a reduction in research as we focus on Ampion.

General and administrative costs decreased $965,000, or 26.3%, for the six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we did not have expenses relating to stock-based compensation from the acceleration of the Aytu stock options held by Ampio employees and professional fees related to shareholder lawsuits that were experienced during the same time period in 2016. We expect our general and administrative expenses to decrease during the remainder of 2017 as we focus on cost reduction measures.

Loss from Operations

The loss from operations for the quarter ended June 30, 2017 of $2.6 million is less than the loss from operations of $5.1 million for the same quarter in 2016. The loss from operations during the six months ended June 30, 2017 of $4.5 million is less than the loss from operations of $11.8 million for the same period in 2016. As stated previously, we expect our clinical trial expense to continue to increase as we conduct a new Ampion trial and prepare to file the BLA with the FDA.

Net Cash Used in Operating Activities

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2017, our operating activities used approximately $5.7 million in cash, which was more than the net loss of $4.5 million primarily as a result of the non-cash gain in the warrant derivatives which was offset by an increases in accounts payable, stock based compensation, depreciation and the acceleration of the related party amortization.

In the 2016 period, our operating activities used approximately $9.5 million in cash which was less than the net loss of $11.8 million primarily as a result of the non-cash items such as losses in equity investments in Aytu, stock-based compensation and depreciation and amortization offset by increased in prepaids and decrease in accounts payable.

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2017, cash was used to acquire $17,000 of manufacturing machinery and equipment.

Net Cash from Financing Activities

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2017, there were gross proceeds from the sale of common stock in a registered direct offering of $6.6 million offset by offering costs of $825,000.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have not generated revenue or profits as our primary activities are focused on research and development, advancing our primary product candidates, and raising capital. As of June 30, 2017, we had $4.9 million of cash which we expect can fund our operation through the next few months. To operate as planned in fiscal 2017 and into 2018 we will need to raise at least $4.0 million through equity offerings, debt, partnering/licensing transaction or other financing tools. This projection is based on several assumptions that may be prove to be incorrect, and we could exhaust our available cash and cash equivalents earlier than presently anticipated. We will be required to seek additional capital within the next few months to continue our clinical and commercial development activities for Ampion. We intend to evaluate the capital markets from time to time to determine whether to raise additional capital in the form of equity, convertible debt or otherwise, depending on market conditions relative to our need for funds at such time, and we are in negotiations with potential investors for near-term financing.

We have prepared a budget for 2017 which reflects cash requirements for fixed, on-going expenses such as payroll, legal and accounting, patents and overhead at an average cash burn rate of approximately $800,000 per month. Additional funds are planned for regulatory approvals, clinical trials, outsourced research and development and commercialization consulting. Accordingly, it will be necessary to raise additional capital and/or enter into licensing or collaboration agreements. At this time, we expect to satisfy our future cash needs through private or public sales of our securities, debt financings, partnering/licensing transaction or our Controlled Equity Offering Sales Agreement that we entered into in February 2016. We cannot be certain that financing will be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. Over the last three years, volatility in the financial markets has adversely affected the market capitalizations of many pharmaceutical companies and generally made equity and debt financing more difficult to obtain. This volatility, coupled with other factors, may limit our access to additional financing and/or make the additional financing dilutive to our current shareholders.

If we cannot raise adequate additional capital in the future when we require it, we will be required to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate one or more of our research or development programs or our future commercialization efforts or suspend operations for a period of time until we are able to raise additional capital. We also may be required to relinquish greater or all rights to product candidates at an earlier stage of development or on less favorable terms than we would otherwise choose. This may lead to impairment or other charges, which could materially affect our balance sheet and operating results.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have off-balance sheet arrangements, financings, or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons, also known as “variable interest entities”.

We are not currently exposed to material market risk arising from financial instruments, changes in interest rates or commodity prices, or fluctuations in foreign currencies. We have no need to hedge against any of the foregoing risks and therefore currently engage in no hedging activities.

We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of senior management, including the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b). Based upon this evaluation, the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 As previously disclosed, on May 8, 2015 and May 14, 2015, purported stockholders of the Company brought two putative class action lawsuits in the United States District Court in the Central District of California, Napoli v. Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Case No. 2:15-cv-03474-TJH and Stein v. Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Case No. 2:15-cv-03640-TJH (the “Securities Class Actions”), alleging that Ampio and certain of its current and former officers violated federal securities laws by misrepresenting and/or omitting information regarding the STEP study. The cases were consolidated, and on February 8, 2016, the plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint alleging claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) and Rule 10b-5 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and Sections 11 and 15 under the Securities Act of 1933 on behalf of a putative class of purchasers of common stock from January 13, 2014 through August 21, 2014, including purchasers in the Company’s offering on February 28, 2014. On September 27, 2016, plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint, alleging the same claims set forth in the consolidated amended complaint during the same class period. On or about November 8, 2016, the parties reached an agreement in principle on a comprehensive settlement of all claims asserted in the lawsuit with no admission of liability by any defendants and with any settlement amounts being funded by insurance. On April 6, 2017, the Court preliminarily approved the settlement and set a final settlement approval hearing for August 28, 2017. The settlement, which provides for dismissal of all claims with prejudice, is subject to final approval by the Court. Upon final approval by the Court, all claims will be dismissed with prejudice with no admission or finding of any liability or wrongdoing by the defendants.

On August 6, 2015 and September 25, 2015, purported stockholders of the Company brought derivative actions in the United States District Court in the Central District of California, Oglina v. Macaluso et al., Case No. 2:15-cv-05970-TJH-PJW (“Oglina action”) and the Colorado state court in Denver, Loyd v. Giles et al., Case No. 2015CV33429 (“Loyd action”), alleging primarily that the directors and officers of Ampio breached their fiduciary duties because of their alleged misstatements and/or omissions regarding the STEP study. On or about March 24, 2017, the parties reached an agreement in principle on a comprehensive settlement of all claims asserted in both the Oglina action and the Loyd action. On June 26, 2017, the settlement was finally approved by the Court and the Oglina action was dismissed with prejudice with no admission or finding of any liability or wrongdoing by the defendants. On June 28, 2017, the Loyd action was also dismissed with prejudice with no admission or finding of any liability or wrongdoing by the defendants.

We operate in a rapidly changing environment that involves a number of risks that could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results, some of which are beyond our control. In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the factors in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the SEC, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. During the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, there were no material changes to the risk factors described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

None.

None.

None.

None.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.