ANI PHARMACEUTICALS INC - Quarter Report: 2007 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
one)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT UNDER SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
|
For
the quarterly period ended September 30,
2007
|
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT UNDER SECTION
13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
|
For
the transition period from ___________ to
______________.
|
Commission
File Number 001-31812
BIOSANTE
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
58-2301143
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
(IRS
Employer Identification Number)
|
111
Barclay Boulevard
Lincolnshire,
Illinois 60069
(Address
of principal executive offices)
(847)
478-0500
(Registrant’s
telephone number including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. YES x
NO o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of
“accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer: o Accelerated
filer: o Non-accelerated
filer: x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES o
NO x
As
of
November 12, 2007, 26,790,607 shares of common stock and 391,286 shares of
class
C special stock of the registrant were outstanding.
BIOSANTE
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
FORM
10-Q
SEPTEMBER
30, 2007
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Description
|
Page
|
|
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
|
ITEM
1.
|
Financial
Statements (unaudited)
|
|
Balance
Sheets as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006
|
3
|
|
Statements
of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2007 and
2006
|
4
|
|
Statements
of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and
2006
|
5
|
|
Notes
to the Financial Statements
|
6-10
|
|
ITEM
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
11
|
|
||
ITEM
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
|
22
|
ITEM
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
22
|
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
24
|
ITEM
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
24
|
ITEM
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
24
|
ITEM
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
24
|
ITEM
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
25
|
ITEM
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
25
|
ITEM
5.
|
Other
Information
|
25
|
ITEM
6.
|
Exhibits
|
25
|
SIGNATURE
PAGE
|
26
|
|
Exhibit
Index
|
27
|
_____________
In
this report, references to “BioSante,” “the company,” “we,” “our” or “us,”
unless the context otherwise requires, refer to BioSante Pharmaceuticals,
Inc.
We
own or have the rights to use various trademarks, trade names or service marks,
including BioSante®, Elestrin™,
LibiGel®,
Bio-E-Gel®,
Bio-E/P-Gel™, LibiGel-E/T™ Bio-T-Gel™, The Pill-plus™, BioVant™, NanoVant™,
CAP-Oral™ and BioAir™. This report also contains trademarks, trade
names and service marks that are owned by other persons or
entities.
BIOSANTE
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
|
||||||||
Balance
Sheets
|
||||||||
September
30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 (Unaudited)
|
||||||||
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ |
25,402,564
|
$ |
7,653,852
|
||||
Short-term
investments
|
3,952,633
|
3,795,977
|
||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
3,599,764
|
10,528,001
|
||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other sundry assets
|
391,301
|
230,644
|
||||||
33,346,262
|
22,208,474
|
|||||||
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT, NET
|
43,783
|
137,040
|
||||||
OTHER
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Security
deposits
|
25,326
|
25,326
|
||||||
$ |
33,415,371
|
$ |
22,370,840
|
|||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ |
559,380
|
$ |
621,818
|
||||
Due
to licensor - Antares
|
881,328
|
2,625,000
|
||||||
Accrual
for contingencies
|
137,647
|
550,588
|
||||||
Accrued
compensation
|
569,831
|
368,522
|
||||||
Other
accrued expenses
|
68,500
|
65,500
|
||||||
Deferred
revenue
|
18,182
|
68,182
|
||||||
TOTAL
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
2,234,868
|
4,299,610
|
||||||
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Capital
stock
|
||||||||
Issued
and Outstanding
|
||||||||
2007
- 391,286; 2006 - 391,286 Class C special stock
|
391
|
391
|
||||||
2007
- 26,787,273; 2006 - 22,975,040 Common stock
|
83,987,530
|
64,967,887
|
||||||
83,987,921
|
64,968,278
|
|||||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(52,807,418 | ) | (46,897,047 | ) | ||||
31,180,503
|
18,071,231
|
|||||||
$ |
33,415,371
|
$ |
22,370,840
|
|||||
See
accompanying notes to the financial statements.
|
3
BIOSANTE
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
|
||||||||||||||||
Statements
of Operations
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||||||
REVENUE
|
||||||||||||||||
Licensing
revenue
|
$ |
9,091
|
$ |
34,091
|
$ |
50,000
|
$ |
102,273
|
||||||||
Grant
revenue
|
20,639
|
106,233
|
46,856
|
242,981
|
||||||||||||
Royalty
revenue
|
14,063
|
-
|
66,991
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Other
revenue
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
55,000
|
||||||||||||
43,793
|
140,324
|
163,847
|
400,254
|
|||||||||||||
EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||
Research
and development
|
1,145,764
|
766,592
|
3,539,081
|
2,900,057
|
||||||||||||
General
and administration
|
1,027,194
|
210,552
|
3,211,759
|
3,902,183
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
17,993
|
30,725
|
79,509
|
85,291
|
||||||||||||
2,190,951
|
1,007,869
|
6,830,349
|
6,887,531
|
|||||||||||||
OTHER
- Interest income
|
379,114
|
122,484
|
756,131
|
288,821
|
||||||||||||
NET
LOSS BEFORE INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||
TAX
EXPENSE
|
$ | (1,768,044 | ) | $ | (745,061 | ) | $ | (5,910,371 | ) | $ | (6,198,456 | ) | ||||
INCOME
TAX EXPENSE
|
(75,000 | ) |
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
NET
LOSS
|
$ | (1,693,044 | ) | $ | (745,061 | ) | $ | (5,910,371 | ) | $ | (6,198,456 | ) | ||||
BASIC
AND DILUTED NET LOSS
|
||||||||||||||||
PER
SHARE (Note 2)
|
$ | (0.06 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.24 | ) | $ | (0.30 | ) | ||||
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE NUMBER
|
||||||||||||||||
OF
SHARES OUTSTANDING
|
27,137,431
|
22,412,189
|
24,928,682
|
20,472,383
|
||||||||||||
See
accompanying notes to the financial statements.
|
4
BIOSANTE
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
|
||||||||
Statements
of Cash Flows
|
||||||||
Nine
months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
CASH
FLOWS (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (5,910,371 | ) | $ | (6,198,456 | ) | ||
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to
|
||||||||
net
cash used in operating activities
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
79,509
|
85,291
|
||||||
Employee
& director compensation - noncash
|
511,044
|
1,024,425
|
||||||
Consultant
compensation - noncash
|
38,804
|
-
|
||||||
Loss
on disposal of equipment
|
21,748
|
-
|
||||||
Changes
in other assets and liabilities
|
||||||||
affecting
cash flows from operations
|
||||||||
Prepaid
expenses, deposits and other sundry assets
|
(160,657 | ) | (20,689 | ) | ||||
Accounts
receivable
|
6,928,237
|
(17,472 | ) | |||||
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
(1,601,801 | ) | (885,697 | ) | ||||
Accrual
for contingencies
|
(412,941 | ) | (61,765 | ) | ||||
Deferred
revenue
|
(50,000 | ) | (102,272 | ) | ||||
Net
cash (used in) operating activities
|
(556,428 | ) | (6,176,635 | ) | ||||
CASH
FLOWS (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Redemption
of short term investments
|
982
|
6,909,815
|
||||||
Purchase
of short term investments
|
(157,637 | ) | (8,022,684 | ) | ||||
Purchases
of capital assets
|
(8,000 | ) | (39,254 | ) | ||||
Net
cash (used in) investing activities
|
(164,655 | ) | (1,152,123 | ) | ||||
CASH
FLOWS PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||
Proceeds
from sale of shares and exercise of options
|
||||||||
and
warrants
|
18,469,795
|
7,384,289
|
||||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
18,469,795
|
7,384,289
|
||||||
NET
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
17,748,712
|
55,531
|
||||||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
||||||||
AT
BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
7,653,852
|
310,643
|
||||||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
|
$ |
25,402,564
|
$ |
366,174
|
||||
SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION
|
||||||||
Other
information:
|
||||||||
Income
tax paid
|
$ |
75,000
|
$ |
-
|
||||
See
accompanying notes to the financial statements.
|
5
BIOSANTE
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
FORM
10-Q
SEPTEMBER
30, 2007
NOTES
TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
1.
|
INTERIM
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
In
the
opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited financial statements contain
all necessary adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, to present
fairly the financial position of BioSante Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”)
as of September 30, 2007, the results of operations for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, and the cash flows for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. Operating results
for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2007 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending
December 31, 2007.
These
unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
financial statements and related notes contained in the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
2.
|
BASIC
AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER
SHARE
|
The
basic
and diluted net loss per share is computed based on the weighted average number
of shares of common stock and class C special stock outstanding, all being
considered as equivalent of one another. Basic net loss per share is computed
by
dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of shares outstanding
for
the reporting period. Diluted net loss per share is intended to
reflect the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts
to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common
stock. Because the Company has incurred net losses from operations in
each of the periods presented, the Company’s outstanding options and warrants
are antidilutive; accordingly, there is no difference between basic and diluted
net loss per share amounts. The computation of diluted net loss per
share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 does not include
options to purchase an aggregate of 1,405,525 and 1,375,557 shares of common
stock, for the three and nine month periods, respectively, with exercise prices
ranging from $2.10 to $6.70 per share, and warrants to purchase an aggregate
of
2,659,652 and 2,557,838 shares of common stock, with exercise prices of $2.15
to
$8.00 per share, for the three and nine month periods respectively, because
of
their antidilutive effect on net loss per share. The computation of
diluted net loss per share for each of the three and nine months ended September
30, 2006 does not include options to purchase an aggregate of 1,037,979 shares
of common stock, with exercise prices ranging from $2.10 to $7.60 per share,
and
warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,586,710 shares of common stock, with
exercise prices ranging from $2.15 to $7.00 per share, because of their
antidilutive effect on net loss per share.
3.
|
LICENSE
AGREEMENTS
|
In
November 2006, the Company entered into an exclusive sublicense agreement with
Bradley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the marketing of Elestrin, the Company’s
estradiol gel, in the United States. Upon execution of the sublicense
agreement, the Company received an upfront payment of $3.5
million. In addition, Bradley paid the Company $7 million in the
first quarter of 2007 triggered by the FDA approval of Elestrin in the U.S.
and
an additional $3.5 million is due on the one-year anniversary of such approval
during the fourth quarter of 2007. Upon receipt of these payments
from Bradley, the Company paid or will pay Antares Pharma IPL AG (“Antares”),
the Company’s licensor of the transdermal estradiol gel formulation in Elestrin,
25 percent of the payments and upon receipt of the additional $3.5 million
payment, the Company will be obligated to pay Antares 25 percent of the
additional payment. Bradley also has agreed to pay the Company
additional sales-based milestone payments of up to $40 million in the event
certain sales-based milestones are achieved, plus royalties on sales of
Elestrin. The Company will pay 25% of any sales-based milestone
payments and a portion of royalties to Antares. Bradley commercially
launched Elestrin in mid-June 2007.
6
4.
|
CONTINGENCIES
|
In
May
2006, the Company, certain officers, one of its directors and a former officer
entered into a settlement agreement related to a personnel matter, under which
the Company agreed to pay the former officer post-termination payments in the
aggregate amount of $780,000 in equal installments in accordance with the
Company’s regular payroll cycle through December 31, 2007, plus $110,000 of
legal fees incurred by the former officer. As required by the agreement, the
payments are secured by an irrevocable letter of credit, which is supported
by
the Company’s short-term investment account. The outstanding balance under the
letter of credit and corresponding accrued liability was $137,647 as of
September 30, 2007 and will continue to decrease as payments are made through
December 2007. In August 2006, the Company’s employment practices
liability carrier paid the Company $500,000 in settlement of the Company’s claim
against the carrier for coverage in this matter. The costs of the settlement
agreement recognized in the first half of 2006 and corresponding insurance
payment receipt recognized in the third quarter 2006 were included in general
and administrative expenses in the Company’s statements of operations in
2006.
On
March
28, 2007, the Company received notice that the staff of the Securities and
Exchange Commission’s Division of Enforcement (the “Staff”) was conducting an
inquiry arising out of allegations contained in a complaint made in February
2006 by the former officer with whom the Company entered into the
above-described settlement agreement to the U.S. Department of Labor,
Occupational Safety & Health Administration (“OSHA”) under the
“whistleblower” provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(“SOX”). Immediately upon notice of the former officer’s intent to
file the SOX complaint in January 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company
directed that an independent investigation be made into the allegations of
securities and other law violations contained in the former officer’s SOX
complaint. The results of the investigation led to the conclusion by
the Company and the Company’s outside legal counsel that the allegations in the
SOX complaint were without merit. OSHA closed its investigation into
the SOX complaint in August 2006. On October 22, 2007, the Company received
notice that the Staff had completed its investigation and intended to recommend
no enforcement action by the Commission with respect to the matter, thereby
closing the inquiry.
5.
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
The
Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment (“SFAS No. 123(R)”) under the modified prospective
method on January 1, 2006. Under the “modified prospective” method,
compensation cost is recognized in the financial statements beginning with
the
effective date, based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R) for all share-based
payments granted after that date, and based on the requirements of Statement
of
Financial Accounting Standards No.123, Accounting for Stock Based
Compensation (“SFAS No. 123”) for all unvested awards granted prior to the
effective date of SFAS No. 123(R). SFAS No. 123(R) eliminates the
intrinsic value measurement method of accounting in Accounting Principles Board
Opinion 25 and generally requires measuring the cost of the employee services
received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the fair value
of the award on the date of the grant. The standard requires grant
date fair value to be estimated using either an option-pricing model which
is
consistent with the terms of the award or a market observed price, if such
a
price exists. Such costs must be recognized over the period during
which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the
award. The standard also requires estimating the number of
instruments that will ultimately be issued, rather than accounting for
forfeitures as they occur.
As
of
September 30, 2007, the Company maintained one stock-based compensation plan,
the BioSante Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Plan, which
is described below. The non-cash, stock-based compensation cost that
has been incurred by the Company in connection with this plan was $511,044
and
$1,024,425 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. No income tax benefit has been recognized in the
Company’s statement of operations for stock-based compensation arrangements due
to the Company’s net loss position.
7
The
BioSante Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Amended and Restated 1998 Stock Plan (the “Plan”)
permits the grant of stock options and stock awards to its employees, directors
and consultants. As of September 30, 2007, 3,000,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock were reserved for issuance under the Plan, and 1,234,336
shares remained available for issuance, in each case, subject to adjustment
as
provided in the Plan. The Company believes that equity-based
incentives, such as stock options and stock awards, align the interest of its
employees, directors and consultants with those of its
stockholders. Options are granted with an exercise price equal to the
market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant; outstanding
employee stock options generally vest ratably over a period of time and have
10-year contractual terms. In certain instances, stock options have
been granted which were exercisable immediately. In these instances,
stock-based compensation expense was recognized on the grant date in an amount
equal to the fair value of the related options. No stock awards have
been granted under the Plan. The Compensation Committee of the Board
of Directors of the Company may at its sole discretion modify or accelerate
the
vesting of any stock option or stock award at any time but may not reprice
any
outstanding options without obtaining stockholder approval.
The
fair
value of each option grant has been estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing-model. The assumptions in the table
below reflect the weighted average of all stock options granted during the
nine
months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006.
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
Expected
life in years
|
10
|
10
|
||||||
Annualized
volatility
|
69.61 | % | 73.94 | % | ||||
Discount
rate – bond equivalent yield
|
4.71 | % | 4.10 | % | ||||
Expected
dividend yield
|
0.0 | % | 0.0 | % |
The
Company uses a volatility rate calculation based on the closing price for its
common stock at the end of each calendar month as reported by the American
Stock
Exchange. Since the Company has a limited history with option
exercises, the expected life was set to the entire life of the option
grant. The discount rate used is the yield on a United States
Treasury note as of the grant date with a maturity equal to the estimated life
of the option. The Company has not in the past issued a cash
dividend, nor does it have any current plans to do so in the future; therefore,
an expected dividend yield of zero was used.
8
A
summary
of activity under the Plan during the nine months ended September 30, 2007
is
presented below:
Options
|
Option
Shares
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
||||||
Outstanding
December 31, 2006
|
1,011,479
|
$ |
3.61
|
|||||
Granted
|
565,000
|
3.53
|
||||||
Exercised
|
(49,747 | ) |
3.88
|
|||||
Forfeited
or expired
|
(121,207 | ) |
4.88
|
|||||
Outstanding
September 30, 2007
|
1,405,525
|
$ |
3.47
|
|||||
(weighted
average contractual term)
|
8.5
years
|
|||||||
Exercisable
at September 30, 2007
|
771,414
|
$ |
3.40
|
|||||
(weighted
average contractual term)
|
6.35
years
|
The
aggregate intrinsic values of the Company’s outstanding and exercisable options
as of September 30, 2007 were $3,286,650 and $1,865,224,
respectively.
A
summary
of the Plan’s non-vested options at December 31, 2006 and activity under the
Plan during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 is presented
below:
Options
|
Option
Shares
|
Weighted
Average Grant Date Fair-Value
|
||||||
Outstanding
December 31, 2006
|
207,833
|
$ |
3.65
|
|||||
Granted
|
565,000
|
3.53
|
||||||
Vested
|
(97,146 | ) |
3.98
|
|||||
Forfeited
|
(32,999 | ) |
4.49
|
|||||
Non-Vested
at September 30, 2007
|
642,688
|
$ |
3.56
|
As
of
September 30, 2007, there was $1,455,971 of total unrecognized compensation
cost
related to non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements granted under the
Plan. The cost is expected to be recognized over a remaining
weighted-average vesting period of 2.27 years.
Cash
received from option exercises under the Plan for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 was $176,235. The intrinsic value of options
exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $118,876. The
Company did not receive a tax benefit related to the exercise of these options
because of its net operating loss position.
The
following table summarizes the stock-based compensation expense for employees
and non-employees recognized in the Company’s statements of operations for each
period:
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
Stock-Based
Compensation Expense:
|
||||||||
Research
and development
|
$ |
191,364
|
$ |
41,051
|
||||
General
and administrative
|
319,680
|
983,374
|
||||||
Total
stock-based compensation expense
|
$ |
511,044
|
$ |
1,024,425
|
9
6.
|
ADOPTION
OF FIN 48
|
The
Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”) on January 1,
2007. FIN 48 requires companies to determine whether it is “more
likely than not” that a tax position will be sustained upon examination by the
appropriate taxing authorities before any tax benefit can be recorded in the
financial statements. It also provides guidance on the recognition,
measurement, classification and interest and penalties related to uncertain
tax
positions. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have an impact on the
Company’s results of operations or financial condition. The Company
is not aware of any uncertain tax positions existing as of September 30,
2007.
7.
|
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2007, warrants to purchase 367,500 shares
of
common stock were exercised for total cash proceeds of
$1,010,625. Warrants to purchase an aggregate of 339,987 shares of
common also were exercised on a cashless basis, for which 163,321 of the
underlying shares were withheld by the Company in payment of the exercise price
for the exercised warrants, thus reducing the number of shares outstanding
on a
fully diluted basis.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2007, options to purchase an aggregate
of
45,867 shares of common stock were exercised for total cash proceeds of
$176,235. In addition, options to purchase an aggregate of 3,880
shares of common were exercised on a cashless basis, for which 7,453 of the
underlying shares were withheld and cancelled by the Company in payment of
the
exercise price for the exercised options, thus reducing the number of shares
outstanding on a fully diluted basis.
On
June
13, 2007, the Company closed a private placement of 3,054,999 shares of its
common stock and associated warrants to purchase 763,750 shares of its common
stock at a purchase price of $6.00 per share to certain institutional and other
accredited investors for gross proceeds of approximately $18.3
million. The private placement resulted in net proceeds to the
Company of approximately $17.3 million, after deduction of transaction
expenses. The warrants are exercisable for a period of three
years, beginning December 14, 2007, at an exercise price of $8.00 per share.
The
number of shares issuable upon exercise of the warrants and the exercise price
of the warrants are adjustable in the event of stock splits, combinations and
reclassifications, but not in the event of the issuance of additional
securities.
In
July
2007, the Company issued warrants to purchase 180,000 shares of common stock
to
an investor relations firm in return for various investor relations
services. The warrants are exercisable at an exercise price equal to
$8.00 per share with 50% of the warrants becoming exercisable on July 19, 2008
and the remainder becoming exercisable on July 19, 2009. The warrants
are exercisable through and including July 18,
2010. The Company uses the Black-Sholes pricing model to value these
warrants and remeasures the award each quarter until the measurement date is
established. In the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company
recorded $38,804 in non-cash general and administrative expense pertaining
to
these consultant warrants.
10
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
This
Management’s Discussion and Analysis provides material historical and
prospective disclosures intended to enable investors and other users to assess
our financial condition and results of operations. Statements that
are not historical are forward-looking and involve risks and uncertainties
discussed under the caption “Forward-Looking Statements” below. The
following discussion of the results of operations and financial condition of
BioSante should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the
related notes thereto.
Business
Overview
We
are a
biopharmaceutical company that licenses and develops hormone therapy products
to
treat men and women. We also are engaged in the development of our
proprietary calcium phosphate nanotechnology, or CaP, primarily for vaccine
adjuvants or immune system boosters, drug delivery systems and aesthetic
medicine.
Our
hormone therapy products are gel formulations of testosterone, estradiol and
various combinations of estrogens, progestogens and androgens. Our
hormone therapy products include Elestrin, LibiGel, Bio-T-Gel, triple hormone
contraceptives (e.g. The Pill-plus), Bio-E/P-Gel and LibiGel-E/T,. We
license the technology underlying our hormone therapy products, except Bio-T-Gel
and triple hormone contraceptives, from Antares Pharma IPL
AG. Bio-T-Gel was developed and is fully-owned by us. Our
license agreement with Antares requires us to pay Antares certain development
and regulatory milestone payments and royalties based on net sales of any
products we or our sub-licensees sell incorporating the licensed technology
and
required us to pay an up-front license fee. We license the technology
underlying our proposed triple hormone contraceptives from Wake Forest
University Health Sciences and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. The
financial terms of this license include an upfront license fee, regulatory
milestone payments, maintenance payments and royalty payments by us if a product
incorporating the licensed technology gets approved and is subsequently
marketed.
We
have
entered into several sublicense agreements covering our hormone therapy
products, including a development and license agreement with Teva
Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., pursuant to which Teva USA agreed to develop our
proposed Bio-T-Gel product for the U.S. market, an agreement with Solvay
Pharmaceuticals, B.V. covering the U.S. and Canadian rights to the
estrogen/progestogen combination transdermal hormone therapy gel product and
an
agreement with Paladin Labs Inc. covering Canadian rights to certain of our
hormone therapy products. The financial terms of these agreements generally
include an upfront license fee, milestone payments and royalty payments to
us if
a product incorporating the licensed technology gets approved and is
subsequently marketed.
In
November 2006, we entered into an exclusive sublicense agreement with Bradley
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the marketing of Elestrin in the United
States. Upon execution of the agreement, we received an upfront
payment of $3.5 million. In addition, in March 2007, Bradley paid us
$7 million which was triggered by U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or FDA,
approval of Elestrin in the U.S. and has agreed to pay us an additional $3.5
million which is due on the one-year anniversary of such approval during the
fourth quarter of 2007. We are required to pay Antares 25%
of these payments as a result of our license agreement with
Antares. Bradley also has agreed to pay us additional sales-based
milestone payments of up to $40 million in the event certain sales-based
milestones are achieved, plus royalties on sales of Elestrin. Bradley
commercially launched Elestrin in the U.S. in mid-June 2007. The
Elestrin FDA approval was a non-conditional and full approval with no Phase
IV
development commitments. In addition, we received three years of
marketing exclusivity for Elestrin.
11
Our
proposed LibiGel product has successfully completed a Phase II clinical trial,
and we began the first of two Phase III clinical trials in December
2006. We believe based on FDA guidance to us that two Phase III
safety and efficacy trials and one year of LibiGel exposure in a separate safety
study are the essential requirements for submission and, if successful, approval
by the FDA of an NDA for LibiGel. Following NDA submission and
potential approval, we will continue to follow the subjects in the safety trial
for an additional four years. The Phase III cardiovascular safety
study will be a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center,
cardiovascular events driven study of between 2,400 and 3,100 women exposed
to
LibiGel or placebo for 12 months. The LibiGel safety study will track
a list of cardiovascular events including cardiovascular death, myocardial
infarction and stroke in women 50 years of age or older and suffering from
at
least one cardiovascular risk factor including hypertension or diabetes. We
plan
to initiate this Phase III safety study by year-end 2007 or in early 2008.
The
objective of the safety study is to show the relative safety of testosterone
compared to placebo in the number of cardiovascular events. The incidence of
breast cancer also will be tracked over the course of the study.
The
Phase
III efficacy trials of LibiGel in the treatment of female sexual dysfunction,
one of which has been initiated, are double-blind, placebo-controlled trials
that will enroll up to approximately 500 surgically menopausal women each for
a
six-month clinical trial. The efficacy trial already initiated is being
conducted under a Phase III protocol reviewed by and on file with the FDA and
in
which written FDA comments have been received and incorporated. We hope to
initiate the second Phase III efficacy trial in early 2008.
In
April
2007, we announced that a new patent had issued covering the formulations used
in Elestrin and LibiGel. The patent, which was issued on April 3,
2007 covering both Elestrin and LibiGel, will expire on June 25,
2022.
In
May
2007, we announced that we licensed U.S. rights to a new oral contraceptive
to
Pantarhei Bioscience B.V. (Pantarhei), a Netherlands-based pharmaceutical
company. Pantarhei is responsible under the agreement for all
expenses to develop and market the product. We may receive certain
development and regulatory milestones for the first product developed under
the
license. In addition, we will receive royalty payments on any sales
of the product in the U.S., if and when approved and marketed. If the
product is sublicensed by Pantarhei to another company, we will receive a
percentage of any and all payments received by Pantarhei for the sublicense
from
a third party. We have retained all rights under our licensed patents
to the transdermal delivery of triple hormone contraceptives. In June
2007, we announced that Pantarhei initiated a Phase II human clinical trial
of
the new oral contraceptive. The Phase II trial, being conducted in
the Netherlands, will enroll approximately 72 women in a double-blind, placebo
controlled, randomized, comparative 2-way crossover study to determine the
effect of a new patented oral contraceptive on sexual arousability and the
vascular component of the sexual arousal response in women. Results
should be available by mid-2008.
Our
strategy with respect to our CaP technology is to continue development of our
nanoparticle technology and actively seek collaborators and licensees to fund
and accelerate the development and commercialization of products incorporating
the technology. In addition to continuing our own product development
in the potential commercial applications of our CaP technology, we have sought
and continue to seek opportunities to enter into business collaborations or
joint ventures with vaccine companies and others interested in development
and
marketing arrangements with respect to our CaP technology. For
example, under a subcontract with DynPort Vaccine Company LLC, we provided
BioVant, our vaccine adjuvant, and DynPort provided recombinant antigens to
be
used in potential vaccines against anthrax. The objective was to
assess the immunogenic potential of BioVant when used in anthrax vaccines versus
the immunogenic response of anthrax vaccines that use alum as the vaccine
adjuvant. We have completed this subcontract and recorded
approximately $300,000 in revenue over the life of the subcontract with $1,806
and $82,985 recognized in 2007 and 2006, respectively. Currently, we
are seeking additional funding from government sources or potential partners
for
our anthrax program.
12
While
our main overall business
strategy is to continue to pursue the development of our hormone therapy
products, especially LibiGel, we simultaneously are continuing to monitor
opportunities to enter into business collaborations, mergers, acquisitions
or
joint ventures with entities that have businesses or technologies complementary
to our business. In addition, we will consider opportunities to
in-license or otherwise acquire other products in the late-stage development
phase that will add value to our current product portfolio, and as a matter
of
course, we from time to time engage in discussions with third parties regarding
the licensing or acquisition of products.
Financial
Overview
All
of
our revenue to date has been derived from upfront, milestone and royalty
payments earned on licensing and sublicensing transactions and from
subcontracts. We have not commercially introduced any products and do
not expect to do so in the foreseeable future, although Bradley, our marketing
sublicensee for Elestrin, launched Elestrin in mid-June 2007, and as such,
we
are entitled to receive royalties on net sales of Elestrin and additional
milestone payments of up to $40 million in the event certain sales-based
milestones are achieved.
To
date,
we have used primarily equity financing and licensing income to fund our ongoing
business operations and short-term liquidity needs, and we expect to continue
this practice for the foreseeable future. In 2006, we recognized $14
million in licensing revenue as a result of the execution of our sublicense
agreement with Bradley and subsequent FDA approval of Elestrin in December
2006. Upon execution of the Bradley agreement, we received an upfront
payment of $3.5 million. In addition, in March 2007, Bradley paid us
$7 million and has agreed to pay us an additional $3.5 million which is due
on
the one-year anniversary of such approval during the fourth quarter of
2007. We are required to pay Antares 25% of these payments
as a result of our license agreement with Antares.
In
June
2007, we completed a private placement of 3,054,999 shares of our common stock
and associated warrants to purchase 763,750 shares of our common stock at a
purchase price of $6.00 per share. The private placement resulted in
net proceeds of approximately $17.3 million, after deduction of transaction
expenses. Our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments were
$29,355,197 as of September 30, 2007.
Our
business operations to date have consisted mostly of licensing and research
and
development activities and we expect this to continue for the immediate
future. If and when our proposed products for which we have not
entered into marketing relationships receive FDA approval, we may begin to
incur
other expenses, including sales and marketing related expenses if we choose
to
market the products ourselves. We currently do not
have sufficient resources on a long-term basis to complete the commercialization
of any of our proposed products for which we have not entered into marketing
relationships. Based on our current cash resources, including the
additional sublicensing payments we expect to receive from Bradley, and our
current commitments, we believe we should be able to maintain our current
planned development activities and the corresponding level of expenditures
through at least the next 18 months, although no assurance can be made that
we
will not need or seek additional cash prior to such time. As an
alternative to raising additional financing, we may license LibiGel or another
product, to a third party who may finance a portion or all of the continued
development and if approved, commercialization of LibiGel or the other product,
or we may elect to sell certain assets or rights we have under our existing
license agreements.
13
Bradley
commercially launched Elestrin in mid-June 2007. As such, we
recognized royalty revenue of $14,063 and $66,991 from the sale of Elestrin
for
the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2007,
respectively. This royalty is based on a percentage of Bradley’s net
sales of Elestrin. The royalty revenue presented in our financial
statements represents the gross royalty revenue to be received from Bradley
and
does not reflect our corresponding obligation to pay Antares a portion of the
royalties received. While we believe that royalty revenues from
Bradley may be significant in the long term, we have not received any meaningful
royalty revenue to date, and we do not know when, if ever, Bradley’s Elestrin
sales will result in significant royalty revenue to us.
We
spent
an average of approximately $350,000 to $400,000 per month on research and
development activities during the nine months ended September 30,
2007. Our research and development expenses increased $379,172 or 50
percent, to $1,145,764 for the three months ended September 30, 2007 from
$766,592 for the three months ended September 30, 2006, primarily as a result
of
increased clinical expenses associated with the LibiGel clinical
program. We expect our research and development expenses to be higher
for the remainder of 2007 and thereafter compared to the first nine months
of
2007 as a result of the commencement of our Phase III clinical development
program for LibiGel. Specifically, we expect our research and
development expenses to increase to approximately $400,000 to $600,000 per
month
beginning in the fourth quarter of 2007. The amount of our actual
research and development expenditures may fluctuate from quarter-to-quarter
and
year-to-year depending upon: (1) resources available; (2) our development
schedule, including the timing of our clinical trials and subject recruitment
and enrollment; (3) results of clinical trials and regulatory decisions; (4)
whether we or our licensees are funding the development of our proposed
products; and (5) competitive developments.
Our
general and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30,
2007 increased $816,642 or 388 percent, compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2006. This increase was due to an increase in non-cash
stock-based compensation expense during the three months ended September 30,
2007 combined with recognizing and receiving $500,000 in settlement of our
claim
against our insurance carrier for coverage in a personnel-related matter during
the three months ended September 30, 2006. Our general and
administrative expenses may fluctuate from year-to-year depending upon the
amount of legal, public and investor relations, accounting and corporate
governance and other fees and expenses incurred.
Although
we recognized net income of $2,791,273 for the year ended December 31, 2006
primarily due to recognizing $14 million in licensing revenue as a result of
the
execution of our sublicense agreement with Bradley and subsequent FDA approval
of Elestrin in 2006 and although we expect to receive royalty income and
possibly sales-based milestone payments from Bradley, we expect to incur
substantial and continuing losses for the foreseeable future. This is
true especially as our own product development programs expand and various
preclinical and clinical trials commence or continue, including in particular
the Phase III clinical trial program for LibiGel which commenced in December
2006 and other trials and studies associated with LibiGel. The
amount of these losses may vary significantly from year-to-year and
quarter-to-quarter and will depend on, among other factors:
·
|
the
timing and cost of product
development;
|
·
|
the
progress and cost of preclinical and clinical development
programs;
|
·
|
the
timing and cost of obtaining necessary regulatory
approvals;
|
·
|
the
commercial success and net sales of Elestrin, on which we will receive
royalties and potential sales-based milestone payments;
and
|
·
|
the
costs of licensure or acquisition of new
products.
|
14
Results
of Operations
Three
Months Ended September 30, 2007 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30,
2006
The
following table sets forth our results of operations for the three months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006.
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
||||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
|||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$ |
43,793
|
$ |
140,324
|
$ | (96,531 | ) | (68.8 | )% | |||||||
Expenses
|
||||||||||||||||
Research
and
development
|
1,145,764
|
766,592
|
379,172
|
49.5 | % | |||||||||||
General
and
administrative
|
1,027,194
|
210,552
|
816,642
|
387.9 | % | |||||||||||
Interest
income
|
379,114
|
122,484
|
256,630
|
209.5 | % | |||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (1,693,044 | ) | $ | (745,061 | ) | $ |
947,983
|
127.2 | % |
Revenue
decreased $96,531 primarily as a result of the completion of our activities
under the Dynport subcontract and a reduction in funding from our University
of
Nebraska subcontract.
Research
and development expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2007 increased
approximately 50 percent compared to the three months ended September 30, 2006
primarily as a result of the commencement of our Phase III clinical development
program for LibiGel in December 2006.
General
and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2007
increased 388 percent compared to the three months ended September 30, 2006
primarily as a result of an increase in non-cash, stock-based compensation
expense in the third quarter of 2007 combined with recognizing and receiving
$500,000 in settlement of our claim against our insurance carrier for coverage
in a personnel-related matter during the third quarter of 2006.
Non-cash,
stock-based compensation expense increased as a result of the recognition of
$186,145 in non-cash stock-based compensation expense during the three months
ended September 30, 2007 compared to $49,203 for the three months ended
September 30, 2006 due to an increase in the number of options granted and
outstanding during the nine month period ended September 30, 2007 versus the
same period in 2006. Our stock option and warrant grants have
remaining lives of one to ten years and will be amortized over the remaining
vesting period. Certain of our stock option grants also have
performance condition-based vesting provisions, which will result in recognition
of expense when such performance conditions are reached.
Interest
income for the three months ended September 30, 2007 increased 210 percent
compared to interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2006 as
a
result of higher average invested cash balances and higher average interest
rates on invested cash balances during the three month period ended September
30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006.
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2007 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30,
2006
The
following table sets forth our results of operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 and 2006.
15
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
||||||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
|||||||||||||
Revenue
|
$ |
163,847
|
$ |
400,254
|
$ | (236,407 | ) | (59.1 | )% | |||||||
Expenses
|
||||||||||||||||
Research
and
development
|
3,539,081
|
2,900,057
|
639,024
|
22.0 | % | |||||||||||
General
and
administrative
|
3,211,759
|
3,902,183
|
(690,424 | ) | (17.7 | )% | ||||||||||
Interest
income
|
756,131
|
288,821
|
467,310
|
161.8 | % | |||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (5,910,371 | ) | $ | (6,198,456 | ) | $ | (288,085 | ) | (4.6 | )% |
Revenue
decreased $236,407 primarily as a result of the completion of our activities
under the Dynport subcontract and a reduction in funding from our University
of
Nebraska subcontract offset partially by royalty revenue of $66,991 as a result
of Bradley’s commercial launch of Elestrin in mid-June 2007.
Research
and development expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 increased
22 percent compared to research and development expenses for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 primarily as a result of the commencement of our Phase
III clinical development program for LibiGel in December 2006.
General
and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2007
decreased 18 percent compared to general and administrative expenses for the
nine months ended September 30, 2006, primarily as result of lower legal costs
incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 combined with a
decrease in non-cash, stock-based compensation expense and recognizing and
receiving $500,000 in settlement of our claim against our insurance carrier
for
coverage in a personnel-related matter during the nine months ended September
30, 2006.
Non-cash
stock-based compensation expense decreased 46% primarily as a result of a
$746,616 charge related to a March 2006 grant of stock options with immediate
vesting to the non-employee members of our Board of Directors, which were fully
expensed on the grant date due to the terms of those awards. Our
other stock option and warrant grants have remaining service lives of one to
ten
years and are being amortized over the remaining vesting
period. Certain of our stock option grants also have performance
condition-based vesting provisions, which would result in recognition of expense
when such performance conditions are reached.
Interest
income for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 increased 162 percent
compared to interest income during the nine months ended September 30, 2006,
as
a result of higher average invested cash balances and higher average interest
rates on invested cash balances in 2007.
The
overall decrease in net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2007
compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was primarily due to the
impact of decreases in general and administrative expenses and non-cash,
stock-based compensation expense and an increase in interest income, partially
offset by increases in research and development expense, as described
above.
16
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Working
Capital
All
of
our revenue to date has been derived from upfront, milestone and royalty
payments earned on licensing and sub-licensing transactions and from
subcontracts. We have not commercially introduced any products and do
not expect to do so in the foreseeable future, although our marketing
sublicensee for our Elestrin product, Bradley Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
commercially launched Elestrin in mid-June 2007, as a result of which we have
received and will be entitled to receive royalties on any net sales of Elestrin
and milestone payments of up to $40 million in the event certain sales-based
milestones are achieved. Our cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments available to fund current operations were $29,355,197 and
$11,449,829 at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively. The increase in our cash and short-term investment
balances was primarily due to our receipt during the first quarter of 2007
of a
net payment of $5.25 million as a result of our sublicense agreement with
Bradley and the completion in June 2007 of a private placement of 3,054,999
shares of our common stock and associated warrants to purchase 763,750 shares
of
our common stock resulting in net proceeds to us of approximately $17.3 million,
after deduction of transaction expenses, partially offset by our use of cash
to
fund operations. We do not have any outstanding debt.
Our
business operations to date have consisted mostly of licensing and research
and
development activities, and we expect this to continue for the immediate
future. If and when our proposed products for which we have not
entered into marketing relationships receive FDA approval, we may begin to
incur
other expenses, including sales and marketing related expenses if we choose
to
market the products ourselves. We currently do not have sufficient
resources to obtain regulatory approval of our other proposed products or to
complete the commercialization of any of our proposed products that are not
licensed to others for development and marketing. We expect the Phase
III clinical trial program of LibiGel to require significant
resources. Therefore, we may need to raise substantial additional
capital to fund our operations or alternatively, we may choose to sublicense
LibiGel or another product for development and commercialization, enter into
other business collaborations or combinations or sell certain assets or rights
we have under our existing license agreements.
To
date,
we have used primarily equity financing and licensing income to fund our ongoing
business operations and short-term liquidity needs, and we expect to continue
this practice, if a similar financing is necessary, for the foreseeable
future. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we also
received $1,186,860 in cash proceeds from stock option and warrant
exercises.
We
believe that our cash and short-term investments as of September 30, 2007,
together with payments we expect to receive from Bradley under our sublicense
agreement with Bradley, will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs
for working capital and capital expenditures for at least the next 18
months. However, we may seek to obtain additional financing prior to
that time. Our future capital requirements will depend upon numerous
factors, including:
·
|
the
progress and costs of our research and development
programs;
|
·
|
the
scope, timing and results of our clinical
trials;
|
·
|
patient
recruitment and enrollment in our current and future clinical
trials;
|
·
|
the
cost, timing and outcome of regulatory
reviews;
|
·
|
the
commercial success and net sales of Elestrin, on which we receive
royalties and may receive potential sales-based milestone
payments;
|
·
|
the
rate of technological advances;
|
·
|
the
potential commercial success of our proposed
products;
|
·
|
our
general and administrative
expenses;
|
17
·
|
the
activities of our competitors; and
|
·
|
our
opportunities to acquire new products or take advantage of other
unanticipated opportunities.
|
If
we
raise additional funds through the issuance of equity securities, our
stockholders may experience dilution, which could be
significant. Furthermore, additional financing may not be available
when needed or, if available, financing may not be on terms favorable to us
or
our stockholders. If financing is not available when required or is
not available on acceptable terms, or additional sublicense agreements are
not
signed, we may be required to delay, scale back or eliminate some or all of
our
programs designed to facilitate the development of our proposed products,
commercial introduction of our products or restrict us from acquiring new
products that we believe may be beneficial to our business.
Uses
of Cash and Cash Flow
We
used
cash in operating activities of $556,428 for the nine months ended September
30,
2007 versus cash used in operating activities of $6,176,635 for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006. Cash used in operating activities for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 was primarily the result of the
net loss for that period partially offset by the receipt of $7.0 million Bradley
receivable, 25% of which was due to our licensor. Net cash used in
investing activities was $164,655 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007
versus cash used in investing activities of $1,152,123 for the nine months
ended
September 30, 2006. Redemption of short-term investments provided
$6,909,815 in cash during the first nine months of 2006. Net cash
provided by financing activities during the nine months ended September 30,
2007
was $18,469,795, which resulted primarily from the completion of a private
placement in June 2007 of 3,054,999 shares of our common stock and associated
warrants to purchase 763,750 shares of our common stock resulting in net
proceeds to us of approximately $17.3 million, after deduction of transaction
expenses, and warrant and stock option exercises. Net cash provided
by financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was
$7,384,289 primarily as a result of the completion of a June 2006 private
placement of 3,812,978 shares of our common stock and associated warrants to
purchase 1,334,542 shares of our common stock.
We
recorded and paid $75,000 in income tax expense during the nine month period
ended September 30, 2007 as we were subject to the corporate alternative minimum
tax provision. Pursuant to further review and tax advice, we recorded and filed
for a tax refund for that same amount during the period ended September 30,
2007. The $75,000 tax refund was received in October
2007.
Commitments
and Contractual Obligations
We
did
not have any material commitments for capital expenditures as of September
30,
2007. We have, however, several potential financial commitments,
including product development milestone payments to the licensors of certain
of
our hormone therapy products, payments under our license agreement with Wake
Forest University Health Sciences, as well as minimum annual lease
payments.
The
following table summarizes the timing of these future contractual obligations
and commitments as of September 30, 2007:
18
Payments
Due by Period
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
Less
than 1 Year
|
1-3
Years
|
4-5
Years
|
After 5
Years
|
|||||||||||||||
Operating
Leases
|
$ |
110,386
|
$ |
110,386
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Obligation
for Settlement Agreement
|
137,647
|
137,647
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||||
Obligation
under License Agreement with Antares
|
881,328
|
881,328
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||||
Commitments
Under License Agreement with Wake Forest
|
710,000
|
30,000
|
160,000
|
160,000
|
360,000
|
||||||||||||||
Total
Contractual Cash Obligations
|
$ |
1,839,361
|
$ |
1,159,361
|
$ |
160,000
|
$ |
160,000
|
$ |
360,000
|
We
expect
to continue to spend capital on:
·
|
research
and development programs;
|
·
|
pre-clinical
studies and clinical trials;
|
·
|
regulatory
processes;
|
·
|
general
administrative expenses, involving investor relations, legal and
accounting fees and expenses; and
|
·
|
the
licensure or acquisition of new products, general business development
including out-licensing of our products in our
territories.
|
The
amount of capital we may need will
depend on many factors, including the:
·
|
progress,
timing and scope of our research and development
programs;
|
·
|
progress,
timing and scope of our pre-clinical studies and clinical
trials;
|
·
|
time
and cost necessary to obtain regulatory
approvals;
|
·
|
time
and cost necessary to seek marketing partners to market our products
for
us;
|
·
|
time
and cost necessary to respond to technological and market
developments;
|
·
|
changes
made or new developments in our existing collaborative, licensing
and
other commercial relationships; and
|
·
|
new
collaborative, licensing and
other commercial relationships that we may
establish.
|
In
addition, our license agreement with the licensor of certain of our hormone
therapy products requires us to make certain payments as development milestones
are achieved. Moreover, our fixed expenses, such as rent, license
payments and other contractual commitments, may increase in the future, as
we
may:
·
|
enter
into additional leases for new facilities and capital
equipment;
|
·
|
enter
into additional licenses and collaborative agreements;
and
|
·
|
incur
additional expenses associated with being a public
company.
|
Under
the
terms of the license agreements with the University of California and Wake
Forest University Health Sciences and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, we have
the
right to terminate the license agreements for any reason, with our only
obligation being the payment of monies owed at the date of
termination.
19
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
We
adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109 (“FIN 48”) on January 1, 2007. FIN 48 requires
companies to determine whether it is “more likely than not” that a tax position
will be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authorities before
any tax benefit can be recorded in the financial statements. It also
provides guidance on the recognition, measurement, classification and interest
and penalties related to uncertain tax positions. The adoption of FIN
48 did not have an impact on our results of operations or financial
condition.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurement
(“SFAS 157”). The standard provides guidance for using fair value to
measure assets and liabilities. SFAS 157 clarifies the principle that fair
value should be based on the assumptions market participants would use when
pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy that
prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. Under
the standard, fair value measurements would be separately disclosed by level
within the fair value hierarchy. The statement will be effective for
us January 1, 2008 though early adoption is permitted. We have not yet
determined the impact, if any, that the implementation of SFAS 157 will have
on
our results of operations or financial condition.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115 (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits an entity to
elect fair value as the initial and subsequent measurement attribute for many
financial assets and liabilities. Entities electing the fair value
option are required to recognize changes in fair value in
earnings. SFAS 159 also requires additional disclosures to compensate
for the lack of comparability that will arise from the use of the fair value
option. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2007. The adjustment to reflect the difference
between the fair value and the carrying amount would be accounted for as a
cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the date of initial
adoption. We have not yet determined the impact, if any, that the
adoption of SFAS 159 will have on our results of operations or financial
condition.
Forward-Looking
Statements
This
quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains not only historical information, but
also
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities
Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and are subject to the safe harbor created by those sections. In
addition, we or others on our behalf may make forward-looking statements from
time to time in oral presentations, including telephone conferences and/or
web
casts open to the public, in press releases or reports, on our Internet web
site
or otherwise. All statements other than statements of historical
facts included in this report that address activities, events or developments
that we expect, believe or anticipate will or may occur in the future are
forward-looking statements including, in particular, the statements about our
plans, objectives, strategies and prospects regarding, among other things,
our
financial condition, results of operations and business. We have
identified some of these forward-looking statements with words like “believe,”
“may,” “could,” “might,” “possible,” “potential,” “project,” “will,” “should,”
“expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “predict,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “approximate,”
“contemplate” or “continue” and other words and terms of similar
meaning. These forward-looking statements may be contained in the
notes to our financial statements and elsewhere in this report, including under
the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations.” Our forward-looking statements generally
relate to:
20
·
|
the
timing of the commencement and completion of our clinical trials
and other
regulatory status of our proposed
products;
|
·
|
the
future market and market acceptance of our
products;
|
·
|
the
amount of royalty revenue we expect to receive from Bradley
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on net sales of
Elestrin;
|
·
|
the
effect of new accounting
pronouncements;
|
·
|
our
spending capital on research and development programs, pre-clinical
studies and clinical trials, regulatory processes, establishment
of
marketing capabilities and licensure or acquisition of new
products;
|
·
|
collaborating,
merging or acquiring entities that have businesses or technologies
complementary to our business;
|
·
|
whether
and how long our existing cash will be sufficient to fund our
operations;
|
·
|
our
need, ability and expected timing of any actions to raise additional
capital through future equity and other financings;
and
|
·
|
our
substantial and continuing losses.
|
Forward-looking
statements are based on current expectations about future events affecting
us
and are subject to uncertainties and factors that affect all businesses
operating in a global market as well as matters specific to us. These
uncertainties and factors are difficult to predict and many of them are beyond
our control. The following are some of the uncertainties and factors known
to us
that could cause our actual results to differ materially from what we have
anticipated in our forward-looking statements:
·
|
lack
of market acceptance of Elestrin and our other hormone therapy products
if
and when they are commercialized
|
·
|
failure
to obtain additional capital when needed or on acceptable
terms;
|
·
|
failure
of products to be commercially introduced for several years or at
all;
|
·
|
failure
to obtain and maintain required regulatory approvals on a timely
basis or
at all;
|
·
|
uncertainties
associated with the impact of published studies regarding the adverse
health effects of certain forms of hormone
therapy;
|
·
|
our
dependence upon Bradley Pharmaceuticals, Inc, for the marketing and
sale
of our Elestrin product and our dependence upon other sublicensees
for the
development, marketing and sale of certain of our other hormone therapy
products;
|
·
|
our
dependence upon the maintenance of our licenses with Antares Pharma
IPL
AG, Wake Forest University Health Sciences and Cedars-Sinai Medical
Center
and the University of California – Los
Angeles;
|
·
|
patient
recruitment and enrollment in our current and future clinical
trials;
|
·
|
the
scope, timing and results of our clinical trials and other uncertainties
associated with clinical trials;
|
·
|
our
ability to compete in a competitive
industry;
|
·
|
our
ability to collaborate, merge or acquire entities that have businesses
or
technologies complementary to our
business;
|
·
|
our
ability to protect our proprietary technology and to operate our
business
without infringing the proprietary rights of third
parties;
|
·
|
our
dependence upon key employees;
|
·
|
our
ability to maintain effective internal controls over financial
reporting;
|
·
|
adverse
changes in applicable laws or regulations and our failure to comply
with
applicable laws and regulations;
|
·
|
changes
in generally accepted accounting principles;
or
|
·
|
conditions
and changes in the biopharmaceutical industry or in general economic
or
business conditions.
|
21
For
more
information regarding these and other uncertainties and factors that could
cause
our actual results to differ materially from what we have anticipated in our
forward-looking statements or otherwise could materially adversely affect our
business, financial condition or operating results, see our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 under the heading “Part I
– Item 1A. Risk Factors” on pages 22 through 32 of such report and
“Part II — Item 1A. Risk Factors” included in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 and elsewhere in this report.
All
forward-looking statements included in this report are expressly qualified
in
their entirety by the foregoing cautionary statements. We wish to caution
readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement that speaks
only as of the date made and to recognize that forward-looking statements are
predictions of future results, which may not occur as anticipated. Actual
results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking
statements and from historical results, due to the uncertainties and factors
described above and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006 under the heading “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors”
and under the heading “Part II — Item 1A. Risk Factors” included in our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 and included
elsewhere in this report, as well as others that we may consider immaterial
or
do not anticipate at this time. Although we believe that the expectations
reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, we do not know
whether our expectations will prove correct. Our expectations reflected in
our
forward-looking statements can be affected by inaccurate assumptions we might
make or by known or unknown uncertainties and factors, including those described
above and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2006 under the heading “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” and under
the heading “Part II — Item 1A. Risk Factors” included in our Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 and included elsewhere in
this
report. The risks and uncertainties described above are not exclusive and
further information concerning us and our business, including factors that
potentially could materially affect our financial results or condition, may
emerge from time to time. We assume no obligation to update, amend or clarify
forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in factors
or
assumptions affecting such forward-looking statements. We advise you, however,
to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our annual
reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on
Form
8-K we file with or furnish to the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
ITEM 3.
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET
RISK
|
We
are
exposed to interest rate risk on the investments of our excess cash, although
due to the nature of our short-term investments, we have concluded that such
risk is not material. The primary objective of our investment
activities is to preserve principal while at the same time maximize yields
without significantly increasing risk. To achieve this objective, we
invest in highly liquid and high quality debt securities. To minimize
the exposure due to adverse shifts in interest rates, we invest in short-term
securities with maturities of less than one year.
ITEM
4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
22
We
maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) that are
designed to reasonably ensure that information required to be disclosed by
us in
the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported, within the time
periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms
and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons
performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure
controls and procedures, we recognize that any controls and procedures, no
matter how well designed and operated can provide only reasonable assurance
of
achieving the desired control objectives and we necessarily are required to
apply our judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible
controls and procedures. Our management evaluated, with the
participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered in this quarterly report on
Form
10-Q. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of the end of such period to provide reasonable assurance that
information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded,
processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the
SEC’s rules and forms, and that material information relating to our company and
our consolidated subsidiaries is made known to management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, particularly during the period
when our periodic reports are being prepared.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There
was
no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
our quarter ended September 30, 2007 that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial
reporting.
23
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1. LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
We
refer
you to the description under the heading “Contingencies” in note 4 of our
financial statements included within this report, which is incorporated herein
by reference.
ITEM
1A. DEFAULTS
UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
We
are
affected by risks specific to us as well as factors that affect all businesses
operating in a global market. In addition to the other information
set forth in this report, careful consideration should be taken of the factors
described in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2006 under the heading “Part I – Item 1A. Risk Factors” and under the
heading “Part II — Item 1A. Risk Factors” included in our quarterly report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 which could materially adversely
affect our business, financial condition or operating results. Other
than as set forth below, there have been no material changes to such
disclosures.
On
October 22, 2007, we received notice that the staff of the Securities and
Exchange Commission’s Division of Enforcement completed its investigation and
intended to recommend no enforcement action by the Commission with respect
to an
informal inquiry the Staff commenced in March 2007 arising out of allegations
contained in a complaint made in February 2006 by a former officer of our
company to the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety & Health
Administration under the “whistleblower” provision of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED
SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF
PROCEEDS
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Equity Securities
During
the three months ended September 30, 2007, we did not issue any shares of our
common stock or other equity securities of ours that were not registered under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, other than in July 2007, we issued
warrants to purchase 180,000 shares of common stock to a certain investor
relations firm in return for various investor relations services. The
warrants are exercisable at an exercise price equal to $8.00 per share with
50%
of the warrants becoming exercisable on July 19, 2008 and the remainder becoming
exercisable on July 19, 2009. The warrants are exercisable through
and including July 18, 2010. The sale of the
warrants to the investor relations firm was made in reliance on either Section
4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as a transaction by an issuer
not involving any public offering or Regulation D of the Securities
Act. Certain inquiries of the investor relations firm were made by
BioSante to establish that the offer and sale qualified for such exemption
from
the registration requirements. In particular, BioSante confirmed that
with respect to the exemption claimed under Section 4(2) of the Securities
Act
(i) the offer and sale of the warrant was made by personal contact from officers
and directors of BioSante or other persons closely associated with BioSante,
(ii) the investor relations firm made representations that it was sophisticated
in relation to its investment (and BioSante has no reason to believe that such
representations were incorrect), (iii) the investor relations firm gave
assurance of investment intent and the warrant, as well as the certificate
representing the shares of our common stock issuable upon exercise of the
warrant, will bear a legend accordingly, and (iv) offers and sales within any
offering were made to a limited number of persons.
24
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
Other
than the withholding of 742 shares of our common stock in connection with the
cashless net exercise of stock options to pay the exercise price of such
options, we did not purchase any shares of our common stock or other equity
securities during the three months ended September 30, 2007, and our board
of
directors has not authorized any repurchase plan or program for purchase of
our
shares of common stock or other equity securities on the open market or
otherwise.
Not
applicable.
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Not
applicable.
ITEM
5. OTHER
INFORMATION
Not
applicable.
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
The
following exhibits are being filed or furnished with this quarterly report
on
Form 10-Q:
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and SEC Rule 13a-14(a)
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and SEC Rule 13a-14(a)
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
32.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
25
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto
duly authorized.
November
13, 2007
|
BIOSANTE
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
|
By:
/s/ Stephen M.
Simes
Stephen
M. Simes
Vice
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive
Officer
(principal
executive
officer)
|
|
By:
/s/ Phillip B.
Donenberg
Phillip
B. Donenberg
Chief
Financial Officer,
Treasurer andSecretary
(principal
financial and
accounting officer)
|
26
BIOSANTE
PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
Method
of
Filing
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and SEC Rule 13a-14(a)
|
Filed
herewith
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and SEC Rule 13a-14(a)
|
Filed
herewith
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
Furnished
herewith
|
32.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
Furnished
herewith
|
27