Apple iSports Group, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2010 October (Form 10-Q)

f10q1010_prevention.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

_______

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended October 31, 2010

¨ TRANSACTION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___________________________ to ___________________________

Commission file number: 000-32389

PREVENTION INSURANCE.COM

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Nevada		88-0126444
(State of Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

c/o Paragon Capital LP 110 East 59th Street, 29th Floor New York, NY		10022
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

(212) 593-1600

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

N/A

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, If Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” "non-accelerated filer" and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer	o	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x No o

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

As of December 10, 2010, there were 99,472,933 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share, and no shares of preferred stock outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION		1
Item 1.	Financial Statements	1
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Plan of Operations	10
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	12
Item 4T.	Controls and Procedures	12

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION		13
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	13
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	13
Item 2.	Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	13
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	13
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	13
Item 5.	Other Information	13
Item 6.	Exhibits	13

SIGNATURES		14

PART I

Item 1. Financial Statements.

PREVENTION INSURANCE.COM
BALANCE SHEETS


ASSETS
	October 31, 2010			April 30, 2010
	(Unaudited)			(Audited)
Current assets
Cash	$	-		$	4,060

Total current assets		-			4,060

Total assets	$	-		$	4,060

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

Current liabilities
Book overdraft	$	598		$	-
Accounts payable		5,950			21,911
Total current liabilities		6,548			21,911

Total liabilities	$	6,548		$	21,911

Commitments and contingencies		-			-

Stockholders' deficit
Preferred stock, par value $0.001; 8,000,000 shares authorized;
zero shares issued		-			-
Preferred stock, par value $0.01; 2,000,000 shares authorized;
zero shares issued		-			-
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized;
99,472,933 shares issued and outstanding		994,730			994,730
Additional paid in capital		3,214,226			3,194,226
Treasury stock, 24,142 shares, at cost		(52,954	)		(52,954	)
Accumulated (deficit)		(4,162,550	)		(4,153,853	)
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)		(6,548	)		(17,851	)

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)	$	-		$	4,060

The financial information presented herein has been prepared by management
without audit by independent certified public accountants

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

-1-

PREVENTION INSURANCE.COM
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


	For the three months ended						For the six months ended
	October 31,						October 31,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)			(unaudited)			(unaudited)

Revenue	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-

Cost of Sales		-			-			-			-

Gross Profit		-			-			-			-

Operating expenses
General and administrative		3,704			3,250			8,697			10,944
Total operating expenses		3,704			3,250			8,697			10,944

Income (loss) from operations		(3,704	)		(3,250	)		(8,697	)		(10,944	)

Provision for income taxes		-			-			-			-

Net income (loss)	$	(3,704	)	$	(3,250	)	$	(8,697	)	$	(10,944	)

Earnings per common shares - basic and dilutive:
Net income (loss)	$	Nil		$	Nil		$	Nil		$	Nil

Weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic and dilutive		99,472,933			98,044,976			99,472,933			97,950,019

Nil = <$.01

The financial information presented herein has been prepared by management
without audit by independent certified public accountants

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

-2-

PREVENTION INSURANCE.COM
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


	For the six months ended
	October 31,
	2010			2009
	(unaudited)			(unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(8,697	)	$	(10,944	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss
to net cash (used in) operating activities:
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
Book overdraft		598			-
Accounts payable		(15,961	)		(4,714	)
Net cash flows (used in) operating activities		(24,060	)		(15,658	)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Net cash flows provided by investing activities		-			-

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of warrants		20,000			15,000
Net cash flows provided by financing activities		20,000			15,000

Net change in cash		(4,060	)		(658	)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		4,060			4,253

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	-		$	3,595

Supplemental cash flow disclosures:
Interest paid	$	-		$	-
Income taxes paid	$	-		$	-

The financial information presented herein has been prepared by management
without audit by independent certified public accountants

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

-3-

PREVENTION INSURANCE.COM

NOTES TO INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

October 31, 2010

NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANTACCOUNTING POLICIES AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Nature of Business

Prevention Insurance.Com (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada in 1975 as Vita Plus Industries, Inc. In March 1999, the Company sold its remaining inventory and changed its name to Prevention Insurance.Com. In 2005, the Company added a second line of business and had been focused on its development of its ATM machine sale operations. On December 28, 2007, the Company entered into an agreement wherein the Company had a change in control and which resulted in the divestiture of the ATM division “Quick Pay”. The Company divested itself of the ATM machine sales operations on October 31, 2008.

As of October 31, 2010, the Company is a shell company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. The Company’s business is to pursue a business combination through acquisition, or merger with, an existing company. No assurances can be given that the Company will be successful in locating or negotiating with any target company.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which management believes are necessary to fairly present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the respective periods presented. The results of operations for an interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or the year as a whole. The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2010 as filed with the SEC on August 6, 2010.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Because of the use of estimates inherent in the financial reporting process, actual results may differ significantly from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

As of October 31, 2010, the Company maintains cash balances in a non-interest bearing account that does not exceed federally insured limits. For the purpose of the statements of cash flows, all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. As of October 31, 2010, there were no cash equivalents.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair value of cash and accounts payable approximate the carrying amounts of these financial instruments due to their short maturity.

Net Loss Per Share Calculation

Basic net loss per common share ("EPS") is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per shares is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average shares outstanding, assuming all dilutive potential common shares were issued.

The weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for computing basic EPS for the three months ended October 31, 2010 and 2009 were 99,472,933 and 98,044,976, respectively.

-4-

Revenue Recognition

For the six months ended October 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company did not realize any revenue.

Stock Based Compensation

As of October 31, 2010, the Company recognizes compensation cost based upon the fair value of stock options at the grant date using the Black-Scholes pricing model.

During the six months ended October 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company did not issue any shares for services nor did the Company issue any options as stock based compensation to any officers, directors, or non-employees.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are provided for using the liability method of accounting. A deferred tax asset or liability is recorded for all temporary differences between financial and tax reporting. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax basis. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effect of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162,” (“SFAS 168”). SFAS 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”) as the source of authoritative generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for nongovernmental entities. The Codification does not change GAAP. Instead, it takes the thousands of individual pronouncements that currently comprise GAAP and reorganizes them into approximately ninety accounting topics, and displays all topics using a consistent structure. Contents in each topic are further organized first by subtopic, then section and finally paragraph. The paragraph level is the only level that contains substantive content. Citing particular content in the Codification involves specifying the unique numeric path to the content through the topic, subtopic, section and paragraph structure. FASB suggests that all citations begin with “FASB ASC,” where ASC stands for Accounting Standards Codification. Changes to the ASC subsequent to June 30, 2009 are referred to as Accounting Standards Updates (“ASU”).

In conjunction with the issuance of SFAS 168, the FASB also issued its first Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-1, “Topic 105 –Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (“ASU 2009-1”) which includes SFAS 168 in its entirety as a transition to the ASC. ASU 2009-1 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009 and will not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations but will change the referencing system for accounting standards. All citations to the various SFAS’ have been eliminated and will be replaced with FASB ASC as suggested by the FASB in future interim and annual financial statements.

As of October 31, 2010, the Company does not expect any of the recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.

NOTE 2. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

As of October 31, 2010 and 2009, the authorized common stock of the Company consists of 100,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.01 and 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.01 and 8,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.001.

For the six months ended October 31, 2010

During the six months ended October 31, 2010, the Company did not issue any shares of common or preferred stock.

For the six months ended October 31, 2009

On September 22, 2009, the Company issued 1,600,000 shares of restricted common stock as payment for the $400,000 note payable to Mr. Goldsmith. As of October 31, 2009, this transaction is being reflected on the Company’s balance sheet as a reclassification from a current liability to equity. The difference between the carrying value of the note payable and the fair value of the restricted common stock issued was recognized as an adjustment to additional paid-in capital.

During the six months ended October 31, 2009, the Company did not issue any shares of preferred stock.

-5-

Warrants

As of October 31, 2010, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Alan P. Donenfeld, as a beneficial owner for securities held by Paragon Capital LP, holds warrants that are exercisable into 155,000,000 common shares of the Company. The $165,000 paid by Paragon Capital LP for the right to exercise these warrants is reflected in the additional paid in capital on the Company’s balance sheet.

As of October 31, 2010, if Mr. Donenfeld and Paragon Capital, LP exercised the warrants that have been granted, they would be required to pay $795,000, except for a cashless exercise right.

Unless and until there is enough authorized common stock available to cover all common stock equivalents, Mr. Donenfeld and Paragon Capital LP has agreed not to exercise any of their warrants.

NOTE 3. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

For the six months ended October 31, 2010

During the six months ended October 31, 2010, the Company issued warrants to purchase 20,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $0.005. Paragon Capital LP paid $20,000 to purchase these warrants. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Alan P. Donenfeld, as a beneficial owner for securities held by Paragon Capital LP, holds the warrants granted.

For the six months ended October 31, 2009

During the six months ended October 31, 2009, the Company issued warrants to purchase 15,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $0.005. Paragon Capital LP paid $15,000 to purchase these warrants. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Alan P. Donenfeld, as a beneficial owner for securities held by Paragon Capital LP, holds the warrants granted.

NOTE 4. COMMITMENTS & CONTINGENCIES

Corporate Office Space

As of October 31, 2010, the Company maintains office space in New York, New York with the Company’s majority shareholder at no cost to the Company.

For the six months ended October 31, 2010 and 2009, the rent expense was zero.

Goldsmith Agreement

On February 5, 2008, Mr. Goldsmith, Paragon Capital LP and the Company signed an Agreement and Release providing for, among other items, (1) cancellation of Mr. Goldsmith’s Preferred stock, (2) cancellation of Mr. Goldsmith’s warrants, in exchange for (1) payment in full of all of the Company’s liabilities, debts, and payables, (2) an initial payment to Mr. Goldsmith of $200,000, (3) conveyance of the assets and liabilities of Quick Pay, Inc. to Mr. Goldsmith, (4) an additional payment to Mr. Goldsmith upon certain events happening such as a reverse merger with a private company of $400,000 or 1,600,000 shares of common stock, and (5) future assignment of warrants held by Paragon to Mr. Goldsmith upon completion of a reverse merger.

As of April 15, 2008, as partial consideration for the cancellation of the 2,000,000 warrants and 1,000,000 preferred shares, the Company paid $200,000 to Mr. Goldsmith who designated that the capital be transferred to Quick Pay. The $200,000 paid to Quick Pay was recorded as a liability to Mr. Goldsmith and is included under net liabilities held for sale caption. As of October 31, 2008, the Company conveyed $59,914 in net liabilities of Quick Pay to Mr. Goldsmith. The Company does not anticipate any additional liability related to the conveyance of Quick Pay.

As part of the amendment to the February 5, 2008 agreement the Company had agreed that a $10,000 penalty would be paid to Mr. Goldsmith if the Company did not convey the net assets of Quick Pay by October 31, 2008. The Company previously accrued for the penalty as of April 30, 2008. The Company has conveyed Quick Pay and therefore a gain due to compliance of the contingency was recognized in the amount of $10,000.

As of April 30, 2009, the Company recognized a liability of $400,000 due to Mr. Goldsmith as a result of the transactions that took place on February 5, 2008. In September 2009, the Company issued 1,600,000 shares of restricted common stock as payment for the $400,000 note payable to Mr. Goldsmith.

-6-

On March 8, 2010, the Company, Paragon Capital LP and Scott Goldsmith entered into an agreement whereby the Company paid Scott Goldsmith $65,000. Paragon Capital LP transferred to Scott Goldsmith its warrant issued April 30, 2008 which was due April 30, 2010 to buy 10,000,000 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $.01. This new agreement relinquishes Paragon Capital LP’s requirement to issue 4,000,000 warrants to Scott Goldsmith. The Company extended the warrant maturity date by two years from April 30, 2010 to April 30, 2012. In September 2009, the Company issued 1,600,000 shares of restricted common stock to Scott Goldsmith as payment for the $400,000 note payable. Scott Goldsmith’s 1,600,000 shares of restricted common stock are subject to adjustment from stock splits.

NOTE 5. INCOME TAXES

As of October 31, 2010, the Company had a federal net operating loss carryforward of approximately $267,531, which expires through 2030. This carryforward may be limited in the future upon change in control of the Company and in accordance with the provisions under Internal Revenue Code Section 381.

In assessing the recovery of the deferred tax assets, management of the Company considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income in the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management of the Company considers the scheduled reversals of future deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. As a result, management of the Company determined it was more likely than not the deferred tax assets would not be realized as of October 31, 2010, and recorded a full valuation allowance.

As of October 31, 2010, the amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits before valuation allowances and the amount that would favorably affect the effective income tax rate in future periods after valuation allowances were zero. The Company has not accrued any additional interest or penalties. No tax benefit has been reported in connection with the net operating loss carry forwards in the consolidated financial statements as the Company believes it is more likely than not that the net operating loss carry forwards will expire unused. Accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net operating loss carry forwards are offset by a valuation allowance of the same amount.

Reconciliation between the statutory rates and the effective tax rates are as follows:

	October 31, 2010			October 31, 2009

Federal and state statutory tax rates		40.0	%		40.0	%
Change in valuation allowance		-40.0	%		-40.0	%
Effective tax rate		0.0	%		0.0	%

Upon adoption of ASC 740 as of May 1, 2007, the Company had no gross unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would favorably affect the effective income tax rate in future periods. As of October 31, 2010, the amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits before valuation allowances and the amount that would favorably affect the effective income tax rate in future periods after valuation allowances were zero. The Company has not accrued any additional interest or penalties as a result of the adoption of ASC 740. No tax benefit has been reported in connection with the net operating loss carry forwards in the interim financial statements as the Company believes it is more likely than not that the net operating loss carry forwards will expire unused.

Accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net operating loss carry forwards are offset by a valuation allowance of the same amount. Net operating loss carryforwards start to expire in 2031 subject to change in control provisions under the Internal Revenue Code.

The Company files income tax returns in the United States. The 2008 - 2010 U.S. federal returns are considered open tax years as of the date of these financial statements. No tax returns are currently under examination by any tax authorities.

NOTE 6. WARRANTS

The Company accounts for stock issued for services, stock options, and warrants for compensation under the fair value method.

For the six months ended October 31, 2010

-7-

For the six months ended October 31, 2009

There were no other options granted or exercised by the directors and executive officers outstanding as of October 31, 2010.

The following is a schedule of the activity relating to the Company's warrants.

	For the six months ended				For the six months ended
	October 31, 2010				October 31, 2009
			Exercise				Exercise
	Shares		Price		Shares		Price

Warrants outstanding and exercisable - beginning of period		145,000,000	$	0.006		55,000,000	$	0.008

Warrants granted:
June 4, 2010		20,000,000	$	0.005
May 29, 2009						15,000,000	$	0.005


Warrants outstanding and exercisable - end of period		165,000,000	$	0.005		70,000,000	$	0.006

Weighted average fair value of warrants granted end of period	$	895,000			$	440,000

The following table summarizes information about the Company's common stock warrants outstanding as of October 31, 2010.

Weighted

Average

Range of

Number

Remaining

Weighted Average

Life Exercise

Exercise

Prices

Outstanding

Contractual

Price

0.005 - 0.01

0.005

165,000,000

3 years

0.005

As of October 31, 2010, the common stock equivalents of the Company exceeded the total common stock available for issuance by approximately 164,472,933 common shares.

As of October 31, 2010, if Mr. Donenfeld and Paragon Capital, LP exercise the warrants that have been granted, they would be required to pay $795,000, except for a cashless exercise provision. At the sole discretion of the warrant holder, there is a cashless exercise provision within the warrant agreements as filed as attachments to Form 8-Ks as filed with the SEC.

Unless and until there is enough authorized common stock available to cover all common stock equivalents, Mr. Donenfeld and Paragon Capital LP has agreed not to exercise any of their 155,000,000 warrants. Pursuant to the agreement with Mr. Goldsmith effective March 8, 2010, the exercise period for the warrants that Mr. Goldsmith holds was extended to April 2012.

-8-

NOTE 7. GOING CONCERN

As of October 31, 2010, the Company’s financial statements are prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

As of October 31, 2010, the Company is a shell company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. The Company’s current business is to pursue a business combination through acquisition, or merger with, an existing company. The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to develop additional sources of capital, locate and complete a merger with another company and ultimately achieve profitable operations. No assurances can be given that the Company will be successful in locating or negotiating with any target company

For the six months ended October 31, 2010, the Company reported a net loss of $8,697 and as of October 31, 2010 has reported an accumulated deficit of $4,162,550.

NOTE 8. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

As of December 8, 2010, the date the financial statements were available to be issued, there are no subsequent events that are required to be recorded or disclosed in the accompanying financial statements as of and for the six months ended October 31, 2010.

-9-

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements made in this Report on Form 10-Q are “forward-looking statements” (within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995) in regard to the plans and objectives of management for future operations. Such statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements of the Registrant to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements included herein are based on current expectations that involve numerous risks and uncertainties. The Registrant’s plans and objectives are based, in part, on assumptions involving the continued expansion of business. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond the control of the Company. Although the Registrant believes its assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance the forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report will prove to be accurate. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation by the Registrant or any other person that the objectives and plans of the Registrant will be achieved.

Description of Business

Prevention Insurance.com (the "Company") was incorporated in the State of Nevada on May 7, 1975, under the name Vita Plus, Inc. The name was later changed to Vita Plus Industries, Inc. and in 2000 the Company’s name was changed to its current name Prevention Insurance.com.

The Company is a shell company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Our principal business objective for the next 12 months and beyond such time will be to achieve long-term growth potential through a combination with a business rather than immediate, short-term earnings. The Company will not restrict our potential candidate target companies to any specific business, industry or geographical location and, thus, may acquire any type of business.

The Company currently does not engage in any business activities that provide cash flow. During the next twelve months we anticipate incurring costs related to:

(i) filing Exchange Act reports, and

(ii) investigating, analyzing and consummating an acquisition.

We believe we will be able to meet these costs through deferral of fees by certain service providers and additional amounts, as necessary, to be loaned to or invested in us by our stockholders, management or other investors. As of the date of the period covered by this report, the Company had no funds in its treasury. There are no assurances that the Company will be able to secure any additional funding as needed. Currently, however our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to generate future profitable operations and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet our obligations and repay our liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. Our ability to continue as a going concern is also dependant on our ability to find a suitable target company and enter into a possible reverse merger with such company. Management’s plan includes obtaining additional funds by equity financing through a reverse merger transaction and/or related party advances, however there is no assurance of additional funding being available.

The Company may consider acquiring a business which has recently commenced operations, is a developing company in need of additional funds for expansion into new products or markets, is seeking to develop a new product or service, or is an established business which may be experiencing financial or operating difficulties and is in need of additional capital. In the alternative, a business combination may involve the acquisition of, or merger with, a company which does not need substantial additional capital but which desires to establish a public trading market for its shares while avoiding, among other things, the time delays, significant expense, and loss of voting control which may occur in a public offering.

Any target business that is selected may be a financially unstable company or an entity in its early stages of development or growth, including entities without established records of sales or earnings. In that event, we will be subject to numerous risks inherent in the business and operations of financially unstable and early stage or potential emerging growth companies. In addition, we may effect a business combination with an entity in an industry characterized by a high level of risk, and, although our management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular target business, there can be no assurance that we will properly ascertain or assess all significant risks. Our management anticipates that it will likely be able to effect only one business combination, due primarily to our limited financing and the dilution of interest for present and prospective stockholders, which is likely to occur as a result of our management’s plan to offer a controlling interest to a target business in order to achieve a tax-free reorganization. This lack of diversification should be considered a substantial risk in investing in us, because it will not permit us to offset potential losses from one venture against gains from another.

-10-

We will not acquire or merge with any entity which cannot provide audited financial statements at or within a reasonable period of time after closing of the proposed transaction. We are subject to all the reporting requirements included in the Exchange Act. Included in these requirements is our duty to file audited financial statements as part of our Form 8-K to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission upon consummation of a merger or acquisition, as well as our audited financial statements included in our annual report on Form 10-K. If such audited financial statements are not available at closing, or within time parameters necessary to insure our compliance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, or if the audited financial statements provided do not conform to the representations made by the target business, the closing documents may provide that the proposed transaction will be voidable at the discretion of our present management.

A business combination with a target business will normally involve the transfer to the target business of the majority of our common stock, and the substitution by the target business of its own management and board of directors.

The Company anticipates that the selection of a business combination will be complex and extremely risky. Because of general economic conditions, rapid technological advances being made in some industries and shortages of available capital, our management believes that there are numerous firms seeking the perceived benefits of becoming a publicly traded corporation. Such perceived benefits of becoming a publicly traded corporation include, among other things, facilitating or improving the terms on which additional equity financing may be obtained, providing liquidity for the principals of and investors in a business, creating a means for providing incentive stock options or similar benefits to key employees, and offering greater flexibility in structuring acquisitions, joint ventures and the like through the issuance of stock. Potentially available business combinations may occur in many different industries and at various stages of development, all of which will make the task of comparative investigation and analysis of such business opportunities extremely difficult and complex.

The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to develop additional sources of capital, locate and complete a merger with another company and ultimately achieve profitable operations. No assurances can be given that the Company will be successful in locating or negotiating with any target company.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of October 31, 2010, the Company had no assets. This compares with assets of $4,060, comprised exclusively of cash, as of April 30, 2010. The Company’s current liabilities as of October 31, 2010 totaled $6,548 comprised exclusively of accounts payable. This compares with total current liabilities of $21,911 comprised exclusively of accounts payable as of April 30, 2010. The Company can provide no assurance that it can continue to satisfy its cash requirements for at least the next twelve months.

The following is a summary of the Company's cash flows provided by (used in) operating, investing, and financing activities for the three months ended October 31, 2010 and 2009.

	Six Months Ended October 31, 2010			Six Months Ended October 31, 2009
Net Cash (Used in) Operating Activities	$	(24,060	)	$	(15,658	)
Net Cash (Used in) Investing Activities	$	-		$	-
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities	$	20,000		$	15,000
Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	(4,060	)	$	(658	)

The Company is dependent upon the receipt of capital investment or other financing to fund its ongoing operations and to execute its business plan of seeking a combination with a private operating company. In addition, the Company is dependent upon certain related parties to provide continued funding and capital resources. If continued funding and capital resources are unavailable at reasonable terms, the Company may not be able to implement its plan of operations.

Results of Operations

The Company has not conducted any active operations since the divestment of the ATM machine sales operations as of October 31, 2008. No revenue has been generated by the Company for the three months ended October 31, 2010 and 2009. It is unlikely the Company will have any revenues unless it is able to effect an acquisition or merger with an operating company, of which there can be no assurance. It is management's assertion that these circumstances may hinder the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s plan of operation for the next twelve months shall be to continue its efforts to locate suitable acquisition candidates.

-11-

For the three and six months ended October 31, 2010, the Company had a net loss of $3,704, and $8,697, respectively, comprised exclusively of general and administrative expenses including legal, accounting, audit, and other professional service fees incurred in relation to the filing of the Company’s periodic reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q.

For the three and six months ended October 31, 2009, the Company had a net loss of $3,250 and $10,944, respectively, comprised of general and administrative expenses including legal, accounting, audit, and other professional service fees incurred in relation to the filing of the Company’s periodic reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the Company’s financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

Contractual Obligations

As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide this information.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide information required by this Item.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

In connection with the preparation of this quarterly report, an evaluation was carried out by the Company’s management, with the participation of the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”)) as of October 31, 2010. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management concluded, as of the end of the period covered by this report, that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective in recording, processing, summarizing, and reporting information required to be disclosed, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information was not accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in disclosure controls and procedures, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Based on management’s assessment over financial reporting, management believes as of October 31, 2010, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to the following deficiency:

●

We were unable to maintain any segregation of duties within our business operations due to our reliance on a single individual fulfilling the role of sole officer and director. While this control deficiency did not result in any audit adjustments to our 2009 or 2010 interim or annual financial statements, it could have resulted in a material misstatement that might have been prevented or detected by a segregation of duties. Accordingly we have determined that this control deficiency constitutes a material weakness.

To the extent reasonably possible, given our limited resources, our goal is, upon consummation of a merger with a private operating company, to separate the responsibilities of principal executive officer and principal financial officer, intending to rely on two or more individuals. We will also seek to expand our current board of directors to include additional individuals willing to perform directorial functions. Since the recited remedial actions will require that we hire or engage additional personnel, this material weakness may not be overcome in the near term due to our limited financial resources. Until such remedial actions can be realized, we will continue to rely on the advice of outside professionals and consultants.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended October 31, 2010 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls.

-12-

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

There are presently no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company, any executive officer, any owner of record or beneficially of more than five percent of any class of voting securities is a party or as to which any of its property is subject, and no such proceedings are known to the Company to be threatened or contemplated against it.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

As a “smaller reporting company” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, the Company is not required to provide information required by this Item.

Item 2. Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

On November 4, 2010, pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement, dated November 4, 2010, Prevention Insurance.com, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), issued a warrant (the “Warrant”) to purchase up to 20,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), to Paragon Capital LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“Paragon”) for an aggregate purchase price equal to $20,000.00. The Warrant is exercisable at an exercise price equal to $0.005 per share and expires three years from the date of issuance of the Warrant, or, if such date falls on a day other than a business day or on which trading does not take place on the principal market, the next trading day. The descriptions of the Securities Purchase Agreement and Warrant, herein, are intended only to be a summary and are qualified in their entirety by the terms and conditions of the Securities Purchase Agreement and Warrant filed as Exhibit 10.1 and Exhibit 4.1, respectively, to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on November 8, 2010 and incorporated herein by this reference.

The Company issued the Warrant without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), by the exemption from registration afforded the Company under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act due to the fact that the issuance did not involve a public offering of securities.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Removed and Reserved.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibit		Description
* 3.1		Certificate of Incorporation, as amended.

** 3.2		Bylaws

*** 4.1		Warrant, dated November 4, 2010 issued to Paragon Capital LP

*** 10.1		Securities Purchase Agreement by and between the Company and Paragon Capital LP, dated November

31.1		Certification of the Company’s Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 15d-15(e), under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, with respect to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2010.

31.2		Certification of the Company’s Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 15d-15(e), under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, with respect to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2010.

32.1		Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2		Certification of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

* Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on August 6, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference.

** Filed as an exhibit to the Company's registration statement on Form 10-SB, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 31, 2002 and incorporated herein by this reference.

*** Filed as an exhibit to the Company Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 8, 2010

-13-

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: December 10, 2010	PREVENTION INSURANCE.COM
	/s/ Alan P. Donenfeld
	Alan P. Donenfeld Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman (Principal Executive Officer) (Principal Financial/Accounting Officer)

-14-