APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC. - Quarter Report: 2006 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
[X]
Quarterly
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For
the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2006
OR
[_]
Transition
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
For
the
transition period from __________ to __________
Commission
File Number 001-14015
IONATRON,
INC.
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
|
77-0262908
|
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
|
(IRS
Employer Identification Number)
|
3716 East Columbia Street, Suite 120 |
85714
|
|
Tucson, Arizona |
(Zip
Code)
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code (520)
628-7415
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See
definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
Accelerated Filer [ ]
Accelerated Filer [X]
Non-Accelerated Filer [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act)
Yes
[ ]
No [X]
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common
equity, as of the latest practicable date. As of November 7, 2006 there were
78,111,878 shares of the issuer's common stock, par value $.001 per share,
outstanding.
IONATRON,
INC.
September
30, 2006
PART
I -
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
|||
Item
1-
|
Consolidated
Financial Statements
|
|||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2006 (Unaudited) and December
31, 2005
|
3
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the three months ended September 30,
2006 and
2005 (Unaudited)
|
4
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the nine months ended September 30,
2006 and
2005 (Unaudited)
|
5
|
|||
Consolidated
Statement of Stockholders' Equity for the nine months ended September
30, 2006 (Unaudited)
|
6
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30,
2006 and
2005 (Unaudited)
|
7
|
|||
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
8
|
|||
Item
2-
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
18
|
||
Item
3-
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
24
|
||
Item
4-
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
24
|
||
PART
II -
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
25
|
||
Item
1-
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
25
|
||
Item
2-
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
25
|
||
Item
6-
|
Exhibits
|
26
|
||
SIGNATURES
|
27
|
2
PART
I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
IONATRON,
INC.
|
||||
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
September
30,
2006 |
December
31,
2005 |
|||||
ASSETS
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
(Audited)
|
|
|||
Current
assets
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
23,817,395
|
$
|
371,248
|
|||
Accounts
receivable - net
|
1,925,738
|
5,367,691
|
|||||
Inventory
|
2,682,941
|
1,348,700
|
|||||
Securities
available-for-sale
|
8,500,000
|
12,000,000
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and deposits
|
296,546
|
486,478
|
|||||
Other
receivables
|
2,690
|
20,085
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
37,225,310
|
19,594,202
|
|||||
Property
and equipment - net
|
2,359,164
|
1,732,796
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
65,813
|
50,449
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
1,487,884
|
1,487,884
|
|||||
Intangible
assets - net
|
750,600
|
787,500
|
|||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$
|
41,888,771
|
$
|
23,652,831
|
|||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
440,164
|
$
|
997,589
|
|||
Accrued
expenses
|
532,900
|
500,656
|
|||||
Accrued
compensation
|
520,488
|
391,867
|
|||||
Withholding
taxes payable
|
36,762
|
45
|
|||||
Insurance
premium financing
|
-
|
216,043
|
|||||
Billings
in excess of costs
|
-
|
84,208
|
|||||
Current
portion of capital lease obligations
|
46,146
|
37,617
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
1,576,460
|
2,228,025
|
|||||
Capital
lease obligations
|
42,595
|
62,290
|
|||||
Deferred
tax liabilities
|
78,589
|
47,991
|
|||||
Deferred
rent
|
105,052
|
82,623
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
1,802,696
|
2,420,929
|
|||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|||||||
Stockholders’
equity
|
|||||||
Series
A Convertible Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 2,000,000 shares
authorized
and 710,000
shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2006; 720,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005. |
710
|
720
|
|||||
Common
stock, $.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 78,001,825
shares
issued and
outstanding at September 30, 2006; 71,996,111 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
78,002
|
71,996
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
59,477,040
|
28,044,794
|
|||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(19,469,677
|
)
|
(6,885,608
|
)
|
|||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
40,086,075
|
21,231,902
|
|||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
$
|
41,888,771
|
$
|
23,652,831
|
|||
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)
3
IONATRON,
INC.
|
||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
||||
(Unaudited)
|
|
For
the three months
ended September 30, |
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
1,537,314
|
$
|
6,219,161
|
|||
Cost
of revenue
|
1,539,077
|
5,560,579
|
|||||
Gross
profit (loss)
|
(1,763
|
)
|
658,582
|
||||
Operating
expenses:
|
|||||||
General
and administrative
|
2,492,610
|
580,042
|
|||||
Selling
and marketing
|
144,522
|
144,928
|
|||||
Research
and development
|
967,850
|
231,806
|
|||||
Total
operating expenses
|
3,604,982
|
956,776
|
|||||
Operating
loss
|
(3,606,745
|
)
|
(298,194
|
)
|
|||
Other
(expense) income
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
(2,122
|
)
|
(63,897
|
)
|
|||
Interest
income
|
255,093
|
9,380
|
|||||
Other
|
500
|
1,853
|
|||||
Total
other
|
253,471
|
(52,664
|
)
|
||||
Loss
before provision for income taxes
|
(3,353,274
|
)
|
(350,858
|
)
|
|||
Provision
for income taxes
|
10,199
|
10,477
|
|||||
Net
loss
|
(3,363,473
|
)
|
(361,335
|
)
|
|||
Preferred
stock dividends
|
(298,054
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Net
loss attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
(3,661,527
|
)
|
$
|
(361,335
|
)
|
|
Net
loss per common share – basic and diluted
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
Weighted
average number of shares outstanding, basic and diluted
|
76,084,796
|
71,354,540
|
|||||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)
|
4
IONATRON,
INC.
|
||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
||||
(Unaudited)
|
|
For
the nine months
ended September 30, |
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
8,609,311
|
$
|
12,745,954
|
|||
Cost
of revenue
|
8,329,486
|
11,740,891
|
|||||
Gross
profit
|
279,825
|
1,005,063
|
|||||
Operating
expenses:
|
|||||||
General
and administrative
|
8,708,326
|
3,449,053
|
|||||
Selling
and marketing
|
419,771
|
375,590
|
|||||
Research
and development
|
3,244,096
|
723,452
|
|||||
Total
operating expenses
|
12,372,193
|
4,548,095
|
|||||
Operating
loss
|
(12,092,368
|
)
|
(3,543,032
|
)
|
|||
Other
(expense) income
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
(11,485
|
)
|
(180,076
|
)
|
|||
Interest
income
|
479,195
|
30,381
|
|||||
Other
|
544
|
2,445
|
|||||
Total
other
|
468,254
|
(147,250
|
)
|
||||
Loss
before provision for income taxes
|
(11,624,114
|
)
|
(3,690,282
|
)
|
|||
Provision
for income taxes
|
32,101
|
29,347
|
|||||
Net
loss
|
(11,656,215
|
)
|
(3,719,629
|
)
|
|||
Preferred
stock dividends
|
(905,377
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Net
loss attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
(12,561,592
|
)
|
$
|
(3,719,629
|
)
|
|
Net
loss per common share – basic and diluted
|
$
|
(0.17
|
)
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
Weighted
average number of shares outstanding, basic and diluted
|
73,858,433
|
71,187,716
|
|||||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)
|
5
IONATRON,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR
THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006
(Unaudited)
|
Common
Stock
|
Preferred
Stock
|
Accumulated
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
APIC
|
Deficit
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance
as of December
31, 2005
|
71,996,111
|
$
|
71,996
|
720,000
|
$
|
720
|
$
|
28,044,794
|
$
|
(6,885,608
|
)
|
$
|
21,231,902
|
|||||||||
Exercise
of stock options and warrants
|
1,276,833
|
1,278
|
-
|
-
|
2,463,610
|
-
|
2,464,888
|
|||||||||||||||
Options
and warrants issued for
services performed
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
214,029
|
-
|
214,029
|
|||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2,882,721
|
-
|
2,882,721
|
|||||||||||||||
Preferred
stock converted into common stock
|
20,833
|
21
|
(10,000
|
)
|
(10
|
)
|
(11
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Preferred
stock dividend paid May
1, 2006
|
46,914
|
47
|
-
|
-
|
624,144
|
(624,191
|
)
|
-
|
||||||||||||||
Preferred
stock dividend paid
August 1, 2006
|
44,807
|
44
|
-
|
-
|
303,619
|
(303,663
|
)
|
-
|
||||||||||||||
Sale
of common stock and warrants
net of offering costs
|
4,616,327
|
4,616
|
-
|
-
|
24,944,134
|
-
|
24,948,750
|
|||||||||||||||
Net
loss for the nine monthsended
September 30, 2006
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(11,656,215
|
)
|
(11,656,215
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
Balance
as of September
30, 2006
|
78,001,825
|
$
|
78,002
|
710,000
|
$
|
710
|
$
|
59,477,040
|
$
|
(19,469,677
|
)
|
$
|
40,086,075
|
|||||||||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)
|
6
IONATRON,
INC.
|
||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
||||
(Unaudited)
|
For
the nine months
ended September 30, |
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(11,656,215
|
)
|
$
|
(3,719,629
|
)
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
687,266
|
920,773
|
|||||
Loss
(gain) on equipment disposal
|
(3,996
|
)
|
58,825
|
||||
Deferred
income tax provision
|
30,598
|
28,731
|
|||||
Provision
for doubtful accounts
|
98,400
|
-
|
|||||
Provision
for losses on projects
|
144,892
|
-
|
|||||
Charge
for obsolete inventory
|
825,433
|
-
|
|||||
Non-cash
stock based compensation expense
|
2,882,721
|
-
|
|||||
Stock,
options and warrants issued for services performed
|
214,029
|
211,646
|
|||||
(Increase)
in other assets
|
(15,364
|
)
|
(28,225
|
)
|
|||
Changes
in working capital components:
|
|||||||
(Increase)
decrease in accounts receivable
|
3,343,553
|
(370,241
|
)
|
||||
Decrease
in other receivables
|
17,395
|
18,973
|
|||||
(Increase)
in inventory
|
(2,731,270
|
)
|
(698,391
|
)
|
|||
Decrease
in prepaid expenses and deposits
|
189,932
|
35,504
|
|||||
Increase
(decrease) in accounts payable
|
(557,425
|
)
|
948,685
|
||||
Increase
(decrease) in billings in excess of costs
|
(84,208
|
)
|
44,713
|
||||
Increase
(decrease) in accrued expenses
|
3,968
|
(77,808
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(6,610,291
|
)
|
(2,626,444
|
)
|
|||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Purchase
of equipment
|
(833,079
|
)
|
(889,524
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from sale of available-for-sale marketable securities
|
4,000,000
|
1,000,000
|
|||||
Purchases
of available-for-sale marketable securities
|
(500,000
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Proceeds
from disposal of equipment
|
6,899
|
-
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by investing activities
|
2,673,820
|
110,476
|
|||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from sale of common stock and warrants
|
24,948,750
|
-
|
|||||
Proceeds
from note payable to stockholder
|
-
|
100,000
|
|||||
Principal
payments on capital lease obligations
|
(31,020
|
)
|
(16,772
|
)
|
|||
Exercise
of stock options and warrants
|
2,464,888
|
524,813
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
27,382,618
|
608,041
|
|||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
23,446,147
|
(1,907,927
|
)
|
||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
371,248
|
2,495,779
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$
|
23,817,395
|
$
|
587,852
|
|||
See
non-cash investing and financing activities at Note 14
|
|||||||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)
|
7
1.
NATURE
OF OPERATIONS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
NATURE
OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS:
Ionatron,
Inc. (“Ionatron”) was formed on June 3, 2002 to develop and market products and
systems based on Laser Guided Energy (“LGE”™) technologies which deliver high
voltage electrical charges via Laser Induced Plasma Channels ("LIPC"™). We
develop LGE weapon and countermeasure products for U.S. Government customer
military and security applications and platforms. We also expect to develop
these products and our other proprietary high voltage technologies into
commercial, industrial and scientific applications. Ionatron and various U.S.
Government organizations have entered into several contracts for technology
development, products and services related to the application of LGE and high
voltage technologies. Additionally, Ionatron has entered into Cooperative
Research and Development Agreements for joint research on Laser Induced Plasma
Channel based directed energy technologies.
From
the
company’s inception to the present, Ionatron has been engaged in research and
development and business development activities. Our technologies support both
lethal and non-lethal applications, including products under development
incorporating lasers, high voltage and other innovative technologies, many
of
which are subject to our patents. In 2005, in response to a heightened threat
and at the request of a government customer, we developed both major components
and a system that can counter Improvised Explosive Devices (“IEDs”) which
constitute a major threat in several areas of war. The company has also entered
into teaming agreements with other defense contractors to advance the use of
our
LGE technology.
Through
our wholly owned subsidiary, North Star Power Engineering, Inc. (“North Star”),
we are engaged in the business of designing and manufacturing a broad range
of
customized, high performance electrical equipment for the defense, aerospace,
semi-conductor and medical industries. North Star also produces proprietary
technology directly for Ionatron applications. The company is continually
exploring ways to apply and advance its unique technologies to provide
commercially viable products in a range of worldwide markets.
BASIS
OF PRESENTATION
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ionatron and our
wholly owned subsidiaries, Ionatron Technologies, Inc. and North Star as of
September 30, 2006 (collectively, "Company," "Ionatron," "we," "our" and "us").
All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. In the opinion
of management, all adjustments (which include normal recurring adjustments)
necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods
presented have been made. For comparative purposes, we have reclassified prior
year rent deposits to long term other assets to conform to current year
presentations. The results for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006,
may not be indicative of the results for the entire year. The interim unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the Company's audited consolidated financial statements contained in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
USE
OF ESTIMATES
Our
consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP), which require
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported
in
the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We have identified
significant accounting policies that require a higher degree of judgment and
complexity. See Note 1
to the
Company's audited consolidated financial statements contained in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K, which should be read in conjunction with these financial
statements.
2.
RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In
September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 108,
“Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Qualifying
Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements.” This Bulletin provides
interpretive guidance on the consideration of the effects of prior year
misstatements in quantifying current year misstatements for the purpose of
a
materiality assessment. SAB No. 108 is effective for companies with fiscal
years
ending after November 15, 2006. To the best of our knowledge we do not expect
the application of SAB 108 to have a material effect on our previously reported
financial statements or the financial statements for the period of
adoption.
8
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurement.” SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement does not require
any
new fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years.
We are currently assessing the impact of SFAS No. 157 on our financial
statements.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined
Benefit Plans and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendment of FASB Statements No.
87, 88, 106, and 132(R),” which requires employers to fully recognize the
obligations associated with single-employer defined benefit pension, retiree
healthcare and other postretirement plans in their financial statements. In
addition, SFAS No. 158 requires companies to measure plan assets and liabilities
as of the end of a fiscal year rather than a date within 90 days of the end
of
the fiscal year and is effective for companies with fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2006. We are currently assessing the impact, if any, of the
adoption of SFAS No. 158.
3.
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
Stock
Options - Employees and Directors
We
have a
number of plans and programs for stock-based compensation of employees,
directors and others. We have the ability to grant stock options for a fixed
number of shares or restricted stock grants to employees and directors. Awards
under the plans vest over periods ranging from immediate vesting to four years,
depending upon the type of award or attainment of specified performance
criteria. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), “Share-Based
Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”). SFAS 123(R) establishes accounting for stock-based
awards exchanged for employee services. Accordingly, stock-based compensation
cost is measured at grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is
recognized as an expense over the employee’s requisite service period.
We
previously accounted for our employee stock option awards under the intrinsic
value based method of accounting prescribed by APB Opinion 25, “Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations, including FASB
Interpretation No. 44 “Accounting for Certain Transactions Including Stock
Compensation, an interpretation of APB Opinion 25.” Under the intrinsic value
based method, compensation cost is the excess of the quoted market price of
the
stock at grant date or other measurement date over the amount an employee must
pay to acquire the stock. We had adopted the disclosure-only provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation,” as amended by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure.”
Accordingly, no compensation cost had been recognized for employee stock option
grants that did not have an intrinsic value at the time of grant.
We
adopted the modified prospective application method as provided by SFAS 123(R).
Under this method, SFAS 123(R) is applied to stock-based compensation made
after
the effective date. Additionally, compensation cost for the portion of awards
for which the requisite service has not been rendered, such as unvested stock
options, that were outstanding as of the date of adoption will be recognized
as
the remaining requisite services are rendered. The compensation cost relating
to
unvested awards at the date of adoption will be based on the grant-date fair
value for those awards.
The
fair
value of each option is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option valuation model. We estimate expected stock price volatility based on
historical volatility within a representative peer group. We estimate expected
life and forfeiture rates. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the
contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield for
comparable periods.
We
recognized non-cash employee and director stock-based compensation expense
of
approximately $950,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2006 and
$2,883,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. There is no related
income tax benefit recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of
operations recorded for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006
because our deferred tax assets are fully offset by a valuation allowance.
The
estimated fair value of our stock options, less expected forfeitures, is
amortized over the awards’ and restricted stock grants’ expected service period
on a straight-line basis.
The
modified prospective transition method of SFAS 123(R) requires the presentation
of pro forma information, for periods presented prior to the adoption of SFAS
123(R), regarding net loss and net loss per share as if we had accounted for
our
stock plans under the fair value method of SFAS 123(R). For pro forma purposes,
the fair value of stock options was estimated using the Black-Scholes option
valuation model and amortized on a straight-line basis. The pro forma
amounts are as follows:
9
|
For
the three months ended September 30, 2005
|
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2005
|
|||||
Net
loss:
|
|||||||
As
reported
|
$
|
(361,335
|
)
|
$
|
(3,719,629
|
)
|
|
Pro
forma stock compensation expense
|
(380,154
|
)
|
(3,190,581
|
)
|
|||
Pro
forma
|
$
|
(741,489
|
)
|
$
|
(6,910,210
|
)
|
|
Net
loss per share – basic and diluted:
|
|||||||
As
reported
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
Pro
forma
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
$
|
(0.10
|
)
|
The
fair
value of our stock options granted in the three months ended September 30,
2006
and 2005 was estimated at the date of grant using the following
assumptions:
|
Nine
months Ended September 30
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||||
Expected
life (years)
|
2.5
years
|
5.0
years
|
|||||||||||
Dividend
yield
|
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
|||||||||||
|
From
|
To
|
From
|
To
|
|||||||||
Expected
volatility
|
38.44%
|
|
42.71%
|
|
62.0%
|
|
75.0%
|
|
|||||
Risk
free interest rates
|
4.57%
|
|
4.96%
|
|
3.29%
|
|
4.05%
|
|
The
following table summarizes the activity of our stock option plans for the nine
months ended September 30, 2006:
|
Shares
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
|||||||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2005
|
3,481,615
|
$
|
4.30
|
|||||||
Granted
|
3,506,850
|
$
|
7.49
|
|||||||
Exercised
|
(1,357,635
|
)
|
$
|
2.72
|
||||||
Forfeited
|
(446,857
|
)
|
$
|
9.35
|
||||||
Outstanding
at September 30, 2006
|
5,183,973
|
$
|
6.51
|
$
|
2,494,998
|
|||||
Exercisable
at September 30, 2006
|
1,879,652
|
$
|
5.17
|
$
|
2,375,460
|
|||||
As
of
September 30, 2006, there was approximately $6.7 million of unrecognized
compensation cost related to unvested stock options granted and outstanding,
net
of estimated forfeitures. The cost is expected to be recognized on a weighted
average basis over a period of approximately two years.
Stock
Options and Warrants - Non Employees
Compensation
expense recorded for shares and options issued to non-employees for the three
months ended September 30, 2005 and 2006 was approximately $66,000 and $159,000
respectively, which was charged to operating expenses with an offsetting entry
to additional paid-in capital. Compensation expense recorded for shares and
options issued to non-employees for the nine month period ended September 30,
2005 and 2006 was approximately $212,000 and $214,000 respectively, which was
charged to operating expenses with an offsetting entry to additional paid in
capital.
10
4.
ACCOUNTS
RECEIVABLE
Accounts
receivable consist of the following at:
|
September
30,
2006 |
December
31,
2005 |
|||||
Contracts
in progress
|
$
|
1,172,330
|
$
|
3,375,104
|
|||
Completed
contracts
|
154,204
|
-
|
|||||
Retained
|
100,000
|
100,000
|
|||||
Cost
and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts
|
569,681
|
1,931,434
|
|||||
|
1,996,215
|
5,406,538
|
|||||
Less:
|
|||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
70,477
|
38,847
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
1,925,738
|
$
|
5,367,691
|
Contract
receivables at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 are expected to be
collected within 60 days. There are no claims or unapproved change orders
included in contract receivables presented. The allowance for doubtful accounts
represents an estimate for potentially uncollectible accounts receivable related
to non-governmental customers which is based upon a review of the individual
accounts outstanding and the Company’s prior history of uncollectible accounts
receivable.
Costs
and Estimated Earnings on Uncompleted Contracts
|
|||||||
|
September
30,
2006 |
December
31,
2005 |
|||||
Cost
incurred on uncompleted contracts
|
$
|
23,150,413
|
$
|
14,457,299
|
|||
Estimated
earnings
|
1,688,382
|
1,122,673
|
|||||
Total
billable costs and estimated earnings
|
24,838,795
|
15,579,972
|
|||||
Less:
|
|||||||
Billings
to date
|
24,269,114
|
13,732,746
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
569,681
|
$
|
1,847,226
|
|||
Included
in accompanying balance sheet under the following
captions:
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
Unbilled
costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts included
in accounts
receivable
|
$
|
569,681
|
$
|
1,931,434
|
|||
Billings
in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted
contracts
|
-
|
(84,208
|
)
|
||||
Total
|
$
|
569,681
|
$
|
1,847,226
|
11
5.
INVENTORY
Inventories
include material, direct labor and related manufacturing and administrative
overhead and are stated at the lower of cost (determined on a weighted average
basis) or market. Our inventories consist of the following at September 30,
2006
and December 31, 2005:
|
September
30,
2006 |
December
31,
2005 |
|||||
Materials
|
$
|
1,884,552
|
$
|
815,788
|
|||
Work-in-process
|
798,388
|
532,912
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
2,682,941
|
$
|
1,348,700
|
Rapid
technological change and new product introductions and enhancements could result
in excess or obsolete inventory. To minimize this risk, the Company evaluates
inventory levels and expected usage on a periodic basis.
6.
SECURITIES
AVAILABLE FOR SALE
Our
investments are classified as available-for-sale and are reported at fair value,
with unrealized gains or losses, net of tax recorded in stockholders’ equity.
Fair value for these securities is based on quoted market prices. The cost
of
investments sold is based on the specific identification method. Realized gains
or losses on the sale or exchange of investments and declines in value judged
to
be other than temporary are recorded as gains or losses in the statement of
operations. We consider numerous factors when assessing impairment on
investments; however, in general, investments are judged to be impaired if
the
fair value is less than cost continuously for nine months, absent compelling
evidence to the contrary. Unrealized gains and losses are determined at each
balance sheet date and are recorded in other comprehensive income, if
applicable.
Available-for-sale
securities consist of the following as of September 30, 2006 and December 31,
2005:
|
September
30,
2006 |
December
31,
2005 |
|||||
Asset
Backed Securities Repriced Monthly
|
$
|
3,000,000
|
$
|
3,000,000
|
|||
Municipal
Bonds
|
4,500,000
|
5,500,000
|
|||||
Total
Debt Securities
|
7,500,000
|
8,500,000
|
|||||
Preferred
stock
|
1,000,000
|
3,500,000
|
|||||
Total
Equity Securities
|
1,000,000
|
3,500,000
|
|||||
Total
available-for-sale securities
|
$
|
8,500,000
|
$
|
12,000,000
|
As
of
September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, there were no unrealized gains or
losses relative to the above securities.
12
7.
ACCRUED
EXPENSES
Accrued expenses consisted of the following at:
|
September
30,
2006 |
December
31,
2005 |
|||||
Accrued
professional fees
|
$
|
23,900
|
$
|
123,000
|
|||
Overdraft
|
-
|
87,698
|
|||||
Property
taxes
|
34,113
|
-
|
|||||
Customer
deposits
|
205,300
|
27,500
|
|||||
Other
accrued
|
269,587
|
262,458
|
|||||
Total
accrued expenses
|
$
|
532,900
|
$
|
500,656
|
8.
STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
On
August
8, 2006, we sold 4,616,327 shares of our common stock and 923,272 warrants
to
purchase our common stock for gross proceeds of approximately $26.5 million.
Placement agent fees and other costs of the offering were approximately $1.6
million. The warrants are exercisable for a period of five (5) years commencing
on August 8, 2006 at an exercise price of $9.15 per warrant share.
9.
INCOME
TAXES
We
account for income taxes under an asset and liability approach that requires
the
expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between book and
tax
bases of assets and liabilities to be recognized as deferred tax assets and
liabilities. During the first quarter of 2004, we established a full valuation
allowance against our deferred tax assets because we determined it is more
likely than not that these deferred tax assets will not be realized in the
foreseeable future. Included in the deferred tax asset is a portion that is
attributable to losses that were incurred prior to a “change in ownership” as
defined by Internal Revenue Code rules. The amount that can be utilized each
year is fixed; however, annual limitation amounts not previously utilized carry
over to subsequent years and can be utilized to the extent of the total
unexpired NOL carryforward amount. The pre-change of control NOL carryforwards
will begin to expire in 2020.
For
the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, we recorded provisions for
income taxes of approximately $10,000 and $32,000, respectively due to an
increase in deferred tax liabilities as a result of the tax amortization of
goodwill related to the North Star Acquisition.
10.
SIGNIFICANT
CUSTOMERS
The
substantial majority of our customers are either the U.S. Government or
contractors to the U.S. Government and represent approximately 96% and 98%
of
revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
11.
NET
LOSS PER SHARE
Basic
loss per share is computed as net loss attributable to common stockholders
divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the
period. Diluted loss per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur
from common shares issuable through exercise of stock options and warrants.
The
dilutive effect of options and warrants, which were not included in the total
of
diluted shares because the effect was antidilutive, was 1,074,424 and 2,553,968
shares for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively
and
751,624 and 2,524,552 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
13
12.
DIVIDENDS
On
October 19, 2006, the Board of Directors declared the 6.5% dividend payable
on
November 1, 2006 to the holders of our Series A Redeemable Cumulative Preferred
Stock and that the dividend will be paid in shares of our common stock to the
holders of record on October 15, 2006. Dividends on Preferred Stock are accrued
when the Board of Directors declares the dividend. The recording of the dividend
will have no effect on our cash or total balance sheet equity. Dividends on
our
Preferred Stock are payable quarterly on the first day of February, May, August
and November, in cash or shares of Common Stock, at the discretion of the
Company.
13.
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
OPERATING
LEASES
In
Tucson, Arizona, we lease office, manufacturing and storage space under four
non-cancellable operating lease agreements. Our primary research and prototype
facility is leased at an annual rental of $330,000 from a company that is
partially owned by principal stockholders. This lease expires in November 2012,
contains renewal options and an escalation provision at the end of 2007 that
increases our annual rent by $49,500. We account for the escalation provision
by
straight-lining the rent expense. On September 16, 2005 we took possession
of
additional manufacturing space that has a monthly rental of approximately $5,100
under a month-to-month lease agreement. In January 2006, we consolidated
executive and administrative offices into one location proximate to our Tucson
research and prototype facilities under a renewable 11-month operating lease,
with monthly rent of approximately $9,400. We have exercised our option to
renew
this lease for a three-year period beginning December 1, 2006. In connection
with the relocation of our North Star operations, on June 1, 2006 we commenced
a
3-year non-cancellable, renewable operating lease at an annual rent of
approximately $64,000 with annual escalations. We are also responsible for
certain property related costs, including insurance, utilities and property
taxes.
On
April
1, 2005 we took possession of office, manufacturing and warehouse facilities
at
the Stennis Space Center in Mississippi under a non-cancelable operating lease.
The lease expires in 2010 with the annual rent increasing from $266,000 in
the
first year to $280,000 in the final year for an aggregate commitment of
$1,367,000. We account for the escalation provision by straight-lining the
rent
expense. The lease may be renewed three times in five-year increments.
We
also
lease vehicles under non-cancelable operating lease agreements to facilitate
our
material purchasing activities. These lease commitments total approximately
$600
per month. We are responsible for registration, licensing and insurance
costs.
Rent
expense was approximately $229,000 and $268,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2006 and 2005 respectively. For the nine months ended September
30, 2006 and 2005, rent expense was approximately $769,000 and $570,000,
respectively. Rent expense includes lease payments and lease related expenses
including rental taxes, passed-through property taxes, common-area maintenance
charges and certain utilities that are not separately metered and billed.
Future
minimum lease payments under these operating lease agreements are as
follows:
Years
ending December 31,
|
Amount
|
|||
2006
|
$
|
209,207
|
||
2007
|
759,728
|
|||
2008
|
812,565
|
|||
2009
|
777,893
|
|||
2010
|
457,600
|
|||
Thereafter
|
711,563
|
|||
Total
|
$
|
3,728,556
|
14
CAPITAL
LEASES
We
rent
office equipment under capital lease agreements with approximately $2,000 in
monthly payments. We also rent two vehicles for use in our operations under
capital lease agreements with approximately $2,200 in monthly payments.
Future
annual minimum lease payments under these leases are:
Years
ending December 31,
|
Amount
|
|||
Remaining
nine months of 2006
|
$
|
12,702
|
||
2007
|
50,810
|
|||
2008
|
29,309
|
|||
2009
|
2,044
|
|||
Total
payments
|
94,865
|
|||
Less:
interest
|
(6,124
|
)
|
||
Total
principal
|
88,741
|
|||
Less:
Current portion of capital lease obligations
|
46,146
|
|||
Long-term
capital lease obligations
|
$
|
42,595
|
GUARANTEES
We
agree
to indemnify our officers and directors for certain events or occurrences
arising as a result of the officers or directors serving in such capacity.
The
term of the indemnification period is for the officer's or director's lifetime.
The maximum amount of future payments that we could be required to make under
these indemnification agreements is unlimited. However, we maintain a director's
and officer’s liability insurance policy that limits our exposure and enables us
to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. As a result, we believe the
estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements is minimal because
of
our insurance coverage and we have not recognized any liabilities for these
agreements as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005.
LITIGATION
In
July
2006, two class action complaints were filed by George Wood and Raymond Veedon
against Ionatron and its founders. Each of the class actions were filed in
the
United States District Court for the District of Arizona and allege, among
other
things, violations of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, claiming that the Company issued false and misleading statements
concerning the development of its counter IED product. The cases will be
consolidated, and a consolidated amended complaint will be served. We are unable
to evaluate the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or estimate the range
of
potential loss, if any. However, the Company intends to defend itself vigorously
in any legal proceedings.
In
September 2006, a derivative action
was filed by John T. Johnasen in Arizona State Court, Pima County against
certain of the Company’s officers and directors alleging, among other claims,
breach of fiduciary duty. The court has stayed the derivative action pending
a
decision on the Company’s anticipated motion to dismiss the consolidated amended
complaint in the class action described above.
In
addition, we may from time to time be involved in legal proceedings arising
from
the normal course of business. As of the date of this report, we have not
received notice of any other legal proceedings.
15
14.
SUPPLEMENTAL
CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
Nine
months Ended
September 30, |
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
|||||||
Interest
|
$
|
11,485
|
$
|
118,563
|
|||
Income
taxes
|
1,100
|
--
|
|||||
Non-cash
Investing and Financing Activities:
|
|||||||
Capital
lease obligations incurred for use of equipment
|
19,854
|
119,746
|
|||||
Common
stock issued for the payment of preferred stock dividends
|
927,854
|
--
|
|||||
Assets
transferred from inventory to property and equipment
|
426,704
|
--
|
16
15.
INDUSTRY
SEGMENTS
The
Company is currently engaged in developing and marketing through two distinct
segments: (1) Ionatron, where the focus is on the development of LGE technology
products and (2) North Star, where the focus is on the manufacture of customized
high performance electrical equipment for sale in a more broad-based market.
Selected
Financial Data for the Three Months Ended September 30,
2006
|
Business
Segment
|
Revenues
|
Depreciation
and Amortization |
Interest
Income
|
Interest
Expense
|
Net
(Loss)
|
Capital
Expenditures
|
Identifiable
Assets
|
|||||||||||||||
Ionatron
|
$
|
1,360,298
|
$
|
215,554
|
$
|
254,939
|
$
|
1,803
|
$
|
(3,071,375
|
)
|
$
|
49,414
|
$
|
43,375,359
|
|||||||
North
Star
|
177,016
|
28,995
|
154
|
319
|
(292,098
|
)
|
123,336
|
2,937,719
|
||||||||||||||
Total
Company
|
1,537,314
|
244,549
|
255,093
|
2,122
|
(3,363,473
|
)
|
172,750
|
46,313,078
|
||||||||||||||
Intersegment
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(2,009,307
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Investment
in Sub
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(2,415,000
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Consolidated
Company
|
$
|
1,537,314
|
$
|
244,549
|
$
|
255,093
|
$
|
2,122
|
$
|
(3,363,473
|
)
|
$
|
172,750
|
$
|
41,888,771
|
Selected
Financial Data for the Nine Months Ended September 30,
2006
|
Business
Segment
|
Revenues
|
Depreciation
and
Amortization
|
Interest
Income
|
Interest
Expense
|
Net
(Loss)
|
Capital
Expenditures
|
|||||||||||||
Ionatron
|
$
|
8,032,522
|
$
|
607,168
|
$
|
478,579
|
$
|
10,789
|
$
|
(10,041,687
|
)
|
$
|
670,236
|
||||||
North
Star
|
951,018
|
80,098
|
616
|
696
|
(1,614,528
|
)
|
182,697
|
||||||||||||
Total
Company
|
8,983,540
|
687,266
|
479,195
|
11,485
|
(11,656,215
|
)
|
852,933
|
||||||||||||
Intersegment
|
(374,229
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Consolidated
Company
|
$
|
8,609,311
|
$
|
687,266
|
$
|
479,195
|
$
|
11,485
|
$
|
(11,656,215
|
)
|
$
|
852,933
|
Selected
Financial Data for the Three Months Ended September 30,
2005
|
Business
Segment
|
Revenues
|
Depreciation
and
Amortization
|
Interest
Income
|
Interest
Expense
|
Net
Income
(Loss)
|
Capital
Expenditures
|
Identifiable
Assets
|
|||||||||||||||
Ionatron
|
$
|
5,904,014
|
$
|
295,285
|
$
|
8,913
|
$
|
63,594
|
$
|
(510,030
|
)
|
$
|
313,202
|
$
|
10,390,958
|
|||||||
North
Star
|
1,035,671
|
29,775
|
467
|
303
|
148,695
|
-
|
2,874,105
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
Company
|
6,939,685
|
325,060
|
9,380
|
63,897
|
(361,335
|
)
|
313,202
|
13,265,063
|
||||||||||||||
Intersegment
|
(720,524
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(85,380
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
Investment
in Sub
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(2,415,000
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Consolidated
Company
|
$
|
6,219,161
|
$
|
325,060
|
$
|
9,380
|
$
|
63,897
|
$
|
(361,335
|
)
|
$
|
313,202
|
$
|
10,764,683
|
Selected
Financial Data for the Nine Months Ended September 30,
2005
|
Business
Segment
|
Revenues
|
Depreciation
and
Amortization
|
Interest
Income
|
Interest
Expense
|
Net
Income
(Loss)
|
Capital
Expenditures
|
|||||||||||||
Ionatron
|
$
|
11,785,933
|
$
|
831,619
|
$
|
29,132
|
$
|
179,190
|
$
|
(3,767,329
|
)
|
$
|
968,060
|
||||||
North
Star
|
1,995,996
|
89,154
|
1,249
|
886
|
47,700
|
41,210
|
|||||||||||||
Total
Company
|
13,781,929
|
920,773
|
30,381
|
180,076
|
(3,719,629
|
)
|
1,009,270
|
||||||||||||
Intersegment
|
(1,035,975
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Consolidated
Company
|
$
|
12,745,954
|
$
|
920,773
|
$
|
30,381
|
$
|
180,076
|
$
|
(3,719,629
|
)
|
$
|
1,009,270
|
17
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
Our
discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations
should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial
statements and the related disclosures included elsewhere herein and in
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations included as part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended
December 31, 2005.
CAUTIONARY
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain
statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the securities laws. Forward-looking statements
include all statements that do not relate solely to the historical or current
facts, and can be identified by the use of forward looking words such as "may",
"believe", "will", "expect", "expected", "project", "anticipate", "anticipated
estimates", "plans", "strategy", "target", "prospects" or "continue". These
forward looking statements are based on the current plans and expectations
of
our management and are subject to a number of uncertainties and risks that
could
significantly affect our current plans and expectations, as well as future
results of operations and financial condition and may cause our actual results,
performances or achievements to be materially different from any future results,
performances or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements. Important factors that could cause our actual results to differ
materially from our expectations are described Item 1A. (Risk Factors) of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. In making
these
forward-looking statements, we claim the protection of the safe-harbor for
forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Reform Act of
1995. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such
forward-looking statements are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such
expectations will prove to have been correct. We do not assume any obligation
to
update these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes
in
assumptions, or changes in other factors affecting such forward-looking
statements.
OVERVIEW
Ionatron,
Inc. (“Ionatron”) was formed on June 3, 2002 to develop and market products and
systems based on Laser Guided Energy (“LGE”™) technologies which deliver high
voltage electrical charges via Laser Induced Plasma Channels ("LIPC"™). We
develop LGE weapon and countermeasure products for U.S. Government customer
military and security applications and platforms. We also expect to develop
these products and our other proprietary high voltage technologies into
commercial, industrial and scientific applications. Ionatron and various U.S.
Government organizations have entered into several contracts for technology
development, products and services related to the application of LGE and high
voltage technologies. Additionally, Ionatron has entered into Cooperative
Research and Development Agreements (“CRADA”) for joint research on Laser
Induced Plasma Channel based directed energy technologies.
From
the
company’s inception to the present, Ionatron has been engaged in research and
development and business development activities. Our technologies support both
lethal and non-lethal applications, including products under development
incorporating lasers, high voltage and other innovative technologies, many
of
which are subject to our patents. In 2005, in response to a heightened threat
and at the request of a government customer, we developed both major components
and a system that can counter Improvised Explosive Devices (“IEDs”) which
constitute a major threat in several areas of war. The company has also entered
into teaming agreements with other defense contractors to advance the use of
our
LGE technology.
Through
our wholly owned subsidiary, North Star Power Engineering, Inc. (“North Star”),
we are engaged in the business of designing and manufacturing a broad range
of
customized, high performance electrical equipment for the defense, aerospace,
semi-conductor and medical industries. North Star also produces proprietary
technology directly for Ionatron applications. The company is continually
exploring ways to apply and advance its unique technologies to provide
commercially viable products in a range of worldwide markets.
Our
intellectual property strategy is directed toward establishing an integral
position for us to be involved with a broad range of products and applications
that utilize concepts, know-how, and technology invented through our own
internal funding and creativity. We believe this approach will enhance our
ability to work for the Government as well as other entities in mutually
productive collaborations. Furthermore, we believe our patent applications
can
be used as justification for sole source, non-competitive awarding of contracts
in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulations. Presently we have four
patents and have 26 pending patent applications. Of the 26 pending patent
applications, we have received secrecy orders on seven and expect to receive
secrecy orders on another eleven. The U.S. patent office imposes secrecy orders
when disclosure of an invention by publication of a patent would be detrimental
to the national security. These patents and patent applications relate to our
core LIPC technology and other technologies related to LGE and high voltage
applications.
18
U.S.
Government support for our LGE and LIPC technologies continues through
Congressional Plus Ups to the U.S. Navy budget. Work continues on our fiscal
year 2005 contract which was delayed until the third quarter of fiscal year
2005
pending release of funds by the military awaiting passage of the Iraq
Supplemental Bill. Funding for fiscal year 2006 has been released and we
anticipate several contract awards from this funding in the near future. We
expect the new funding to support continued technology development and effects
testing, including advancement of the understanding of the physics of various
aspects of the technology. The U.S. Government has advanced the management
of
the LIPC transportable demonstrator project to the military. Total LIPC and
LGE
dedicated funding was approximately $11.1 million and $12.7 million for fiscal
years 2006 and 2005, respectively. During the third quarter 2006 an additional
approximately $5.1 million in Government funding was identified to implement
a
new program that will involve several organizations within the Department of
Defense (“DoD”) in developing a new application for the core LGE and LIPC
technologies. As announced October 2, 2006, additional funding of approximately
$600,000 from another DoD entity was inserted into an existing contract to
support additional effects testing. The DoD component that sponsored that effort
is in the process of implementing its own contracting vehicle so that
mission-specific applications for that organization will be directly managed
by
that organization. It is expected that the funding for this will occur during
the first quarter of 2007 and is expected to be in excess of approximately
$1.0
million.
The
fiscal year 2007 Defense Authorization bill contained approximately $400,000
for
testing of the Counter-IED system technology by an independent group. It is
expected that this testing will occur during late fourth quarter 2006, or early
first quarter 2007.
Ionatron
also signed CRADA agreements with the U.S. Army Research and Engineering
Development Command at Picatinny Arsenal and the Naval Surface Warfare Center
at
Crane in the third quarter of 2006. These agreements allow for Ionatron to
work
with these groups in a cooperative manner and retain key intellectual property,
while having access to Government provided information that would not normally
be available to a private entity.
During
the third quarter of 2006 Ionatron received a Small Business Technology Transfer
Research Contract from the Army Research Office. This effort involves using
unique aspects of the ultra-short pulse laser technology for remote sensing
applications. Ionatron is teamed with the University of Arizona in this effort.
While the amount of this award is approximately $100,000, it is only a phase
1
activity over 6 months. The program is progressing well and should complete
in
the first quarter of 2007. Upon completion it is anticipated that the results
will warrant continuing the program in a phase 2 effort for building
hardware.
OPERATING
SEGMENTS
We
are
currently engaged in developing and marketing through two operating segments:
(1) Ionatron, where the focus is on Directed Energy Weapon technology products
for sale to the U.S. Government and (2) North Star, where the focus is on the
manufacture of customized high performance electrical equipment for sale to
a
more broad-based market.
19
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
COMPARISON
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND 2005 IS AS
FOLLOWS:
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
1,537,314
|
$
|
6,219,161
|
|||
Cost
of revenue
|
1,539,077
|
5,560,579
|
|||||
General
and administrative
|
2,492,610
|
580,042
|
|||||
Selling
and marketing
|
144,522
|
144,928
|
|||||
Research
and development
|
967,850
|
231,806
|
|||||
Other
(expense) income:
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
(2,122
|
)
|
(63,897
|
)
|
|||
Interest
income
|
255,093
|
9,380
|
|||||
Other
|
500
|
1,853
|
|||||
Loss
before provision for income taxes
|
(3,353,274
|
)
|
(350,858
|
)
|
|||
Provision
for income taxes
|
10,199
|
10,477
|
|||||
Net
loss
|
($3,363,473
|
)
|
($361,335
|
)
|
REVENUE
The
decrease of approximately $4,682,000 in revenue for the three months ended
September 30, 2006 compared to 2005 is attributable to the completion last
quarter of certain Ionatron government contracts, including the completion
of
our initial 12-unit counter IED (“Improvised Explosive Device”) order.
COST
OF REVENUE
Cost
of
revenue decreased approximately $4,022,000 when compared to the three months
ended September 30, 2005 due to decreased direct revenue activity. Cost of
revenue includes an allocation of general and administrative expenses and
research and development costs in accordance with the terms of our contracts.
Primarily as a result of lower revenue, the amount of allowable expenses
allocated to our revenue projects also decreased.
GENERAL
AND ADMINISTRATIVE
The
increase of approximately $1.9 million in general and administrative expenses
for the three months ended September 30, 2006 from the three months ended
September 30, 2005 included the recognition of non-cash director and employee
stock option compensation expense of approximately $950,000 as a result of
our
adoption of SFAS 123(R). We incurred a charge for excess or obsolete inventory
of approximately $619,000 that was based on a lower of cost or market analysis
of items in inventory that are no longer on our active bills-of-material. We
also experienced increases in personnel costs and temporary and contract labor
costs of approximately $579,000, which is attributable to our increased number
of employees over the second quarter of 2005 and our need for temporary staffing
to assist in short-term projects. Through the relocation of North Star
operations and through consolidation of administrative tasks and other
optimizations, we have reduced our overall head-count from March 2006 levels
and
expect to realize the cost savings of these efficiencies going forward.
SELLING
AND MARKETING
Selling
and marketing expenses remained level at approximately $144,000 for the three
months ended September 30, 2006 and the same period in 2005 which reflects
the
increase in personnel costs, with the addition of one staff member in 2006,
and
a decrease in other expenses as we continue to advance our marketing efforts.
20
RESEARCH
AND DEVELOPMENT
Research
and development expenses increased approximately $736,000 during the three
months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to 2005 due to our continued
strategic decision to internally-fund research and development. During the
three
months ended September 30, 2006, we continued work on our on-going research
projects to expedite the advancement of our core LGE and LIPC technologies.
Research and development projects also include work on the vehicle-stopper
technology which was derived from our core LGE and LIPC knowledge base. These
strategic decisions are designed to advance and strengthen our intellectual
property rights and progress technology development at a rate that is less
dependent on contract funding.
INTEREST
EXPENSE AND INTEREST INCOME
Interest
expense in the second quarter of 2006 decreased approximately $62,000 from
the
same period of 2005 as a result of our retirement of debt in 2005. Interest
income increased approximately $246,000 earned through our investment in
securities available for sale.
NORTH
STAR OPERATIONS
Our
consolidated financial information contains the results of North Star for the
three months ended September 30, 2006. North Star’s revenue, net of intersegment
transactions, decreased to approximately $177,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2006 from approximately $315,000 for the same period in 2005.
North Star’s revenue activity for the quarter resulted in a negative gross
margin due to an approximately $144,000 provision for losses on projects for
North Star customers which we expect will be completed at a loss. Net income
for
North Star decreased from approximately $149,000 for the three months ended
September 30, 2005 to a net loss of approximately $292,000 for the same period
in 2006.
NET
LOSS
Our
operations for the three months ended September 30, 2006 resulted in a net
loss
of approximately $3.4 million, an increase in our period loss of approximately
$3.0 million when compared to the same period in 2005. This increase includes
non-cash employee stock option compensation of approximately $950,000, the
effect of dedicating substantial resources to increased research and development
initiatives (research and development expenditures increased by approximately
$736,000 for the quarter) and a provision for excess or obsolete inventory
of
approximately $619,000,.
21
COMPARISON
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2006 AND 2005 IS AS
FOLLOWS:
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
8,609,311
|
$
|
12,745,954
|
|||
Cost
of revenue
|
8,329,486
|
11,740,891
|
|||||
General
and administrative
|
8,708,326
|
3,449,053
|
|||||
Selling
and marketing
|
419,771
|
375,590
|
|||||
Research
and development
|
3,244,096
|
723,452
|
|||||
Other
(expense) income:
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
(11,485
|
)
|
(180,076
|
)
|
|||
Interest
income
|
479,195
|
30,381
|
|||||
Other
|
544
|
2,445
|
|||||
Loss
before provision for income taxes
|
(11,624,114
|
)
|
(3,690,282
|
)
|
|||
Provision
for income taxes
|
32,101
|
29,347
|
|||||
Net
loss
|
($11,656,215
|
)
|
($3,719,629
|
)
|
REVENUE
Consolidated
revenues for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2006 decreased
approximately $4.1 million over the same period in 2005 which is attributable
to
the completion of certain Ionatron government contracts, including the initial
12-unit counter IED (“Improvised Explosive Device”) order and our increased
resource allocations to research and development.
COST
OF REVENUE
Cost
of
revenue decreased approximately $3.4 million when compared to the nine months
ended September 30, 2005 due to decreased revenue activity. The gross margin
percentage associated with these costs decreased by approximately 4.6% compared
to the same period performance in 2005. Cost of revenue includes an allocation
of general and administrative expenses and research and development costs in
accordance with the terms of our contracts. Primarily as a result of lower
revenue, the amount of allowable expenses allocated to our revenue projects
also
decreased.
GENERAL
AND ADMINISTRATIVE
The
increase of approximately $5.3 million in general and administrative expenses
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 included the recognition of non-cash director and employee
stock option compensation expense of approximately $2.9 million as a result
of
our adoption of SFAS 123(R). Incurred general and administrative expenses
increased approximately $6.0 million partially offset by an approximate $3.5
million increased amount of general and administrative expenses allocated to
cost of revenue, research and development, and inventory. The $6.0 million
increase was primarily caused by increases in personnel costs and temporary
and
contract labor costs of approximately $4.2 million, which is attributable to
our
increased number of employees over the same period of 2005 and our need for
temporary staffing to assist in short-term projects and increased competencies
in marketing, finance and accounting. We incurred a charge for excess or
obsolete inventory of approximately $825,000 that was primarily based on a
lower
of cost or market analysis of items in inventory that are no longer on our
active bills-of-material. One-time costs of approximately $525,000 associated
with the relocation of North Star facilities and resettlement of North Star
employees are included in this increase and professional and director expenses
increased approximately $635,000 which is reflective of increased legal costs,
director compensation costs and the non-cash expense of a warrant issued for
services.
22
SELLING
AND MARKETING
Selling
and marketing expenses increased by approximately $44,000 during the nine months
ended September 30, 2006 from the same period in 2005 as we continue to advance
our marketing efforts through the addition of one staff member in 2006.
RESEARCH
AND DEVELOPMENT
Research
and development expenses increased approximately $2.5 million during the nine
months ended September 30, 2006 as compared to 2005 due to our continued
strategic decision to internally-fund research and development. During the
nine
months ended September 30, 2006 we commenced new research and development
initiatives and we continued work on our on-going research projects to expedite
the advancement of our core LGE and LIPC technologies. Research and development
projects also include work on the vehicle-stopper technology which was derived
from our core LGE and LIPC knowledge base. These strategic decisions are
designed to advance and strengthen our intellectual property rights and progress
technology development at a rate that is less dependent on contract
funding.
INTEREST
EXPENSE AND INTEREST INCOME
Interest
expense in the first nine months of 2006 decreased approximately $169,000 from
the first nine months of 2005 as a result of our retirement of debt in 2005.
Interest income increased approximately $449,000 earned through our investment
in securities available for sale.
NORTH
STAR OPERATIONS
Our
consolidated financial information contains the results of North Star for the
nine months ended September 30, 2006. North Star’s revenue, net of intersegment
transactions, decreased to approximately $577,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006 from approximately $960,000 for the same period in 2005.
This
decrease is due to the relocation of North Star operations which necessitated
a
temporary suspension of operations of approximately eight weeks during the
second quarter. Net income for North Star decreased from approximately $48,000
for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 to a net loss of approximately
$1.6
million for the same period in 2006. The 2006 first nine-month North Star loss
includes approximately $525,000 in one-time relocation charges, negative gross
margins associated with completing certain projects and providing for estimated
losses on other projects. Management continues to closely monitor activity
at
the subsidiary with the intention to improve North Star’s financial and
operational performance.
NET
LOSS
Our
operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 resulted in a net loss
of approximately $11.7 million, an increase in our period loss of approximately
$8.0 million when compared to the same period in 2005. This increase includes
non-cash employee stock option compensation of approximately $2.9 million,
the
effect of dedicating substantial resources to increased research and development
initiatives (research and development expenditures increased by approximately
$2.5 million for the year to date), the increase of other general and
administrative costs of approximately $2.3 million for expenditures associated
with increased rent and facilities expense and an increase in staff, temporary
and contract labor, and professional and director expenses compared to our
2005
same period operations, a provision for excess or obsolete inventory of
approximately $825,000 and a one-time relocation charges of more than $547,000.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At
September 30, 2006, we had approximately $32.3 million of cash and cash
equivalents and available-for-sale marketable securities, an increase of
approximately $19.9 million from cash and cash equivalents and
available-for-sale marketable securities at December 31, 2005 of approximately
$12.4 million. The increase is attributable to the sale of common stock and
warrants in August 2006. We keep sufficient cash on hand to service our
anticipated immediate cash requirements and invest our cash and cash equivalents
and available-for-sale marketable securities in short-term, highly liquid money
market funds and specific marketable securities which are highly liquid
investments. Our investments are readily available for conversion to cash to
support our ongoing requirements.
23
During
the first nine months of 2006, we used approximately $6.6 million of cash in
operating activities. This amount is comprised primarily of our net loss of
approximately $11.7 million and an increase in inventory of approximately $2.7
million reduced by a decrease in accounts receivable net collections of
approximately $3.3 million, non-cash stock option compensation expense of
approximately $2.9 million, a charge for obsolete inventory of approximately
$825,000 and depreciation and amortization expense of approximately $687,000.
We
anticipate that short-term and long-term funding needs will be provided from
cash and cash equivalents and available-for-sale marketable securities and
cash
flow from government contracts. In the first nine months of 2006, investment
activities provided approximately $2.7 million of cash, consisting of the
proceeds from the sale and purchase of investments of $3.5 million, partially
offset by equipment purchases of approximately $833,000. During the first nine
months of 2006, financing activities provided approximately $27.4 million of
cash, primarily from the proceeds from the sale of common stock and warrants
of
approximately $24.9 million, as well as approximately $2.5 million proceeds
from
option exercises.
We
believe that we have sufficient cash, or access to sufficient cash through
potential banking or investing relationships to meet current and future cash
needs. Contracts related to our core technologies are on a cost plus fixed
fee
basis. This means the majority of work performed is done at our
government-approved rates, which include general and administrative costs,
overhead, labor and materials, fees and profit. These costs are accrued as
incurred and billed monthly. These government-approved rates are adjusted
periodically and may be adjusted in the future to incorporate additional costs
as the operations expand. Other contracts are at fixed prices which have
commercial type gross margins associated with them.
BACK-LOG
OF ORDERS
At
September 30, 2006, we had a backlog (that is, work load remaining on signed
contracts) of approximately $4,737,000 to be completed within the next twelve
months. The backlog does not include proposals and contracts under
negotiation.
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
In
the
normal course of business, our financial position is subject to a variety of
risks, such as the collectibility of our accounts receivable and the
recoverability of the carrying values of our long-term assets. We do not
presently enter into any transactions involving derivative financial instruments
for risk management or other purposes.
Our
available cash balances are invested on a short-term basis and are not subject
to significant risks associated with changes in interest rates. Substantially
all of our cash flows are derived from our operations and transactions within
the United States and we are not subject to market risk associated with changes
in foreign exchange rates.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
EVALUATION
OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our
management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures as of September 30, 2006. Based on that evaluation, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to
be
disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. During
the quarter ended September 30, 2006, there was no significant change in our
internal controls over financial reports that has materially affected, or which
is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial
reporting.
24
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1 LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
In
July
2006, two class action complaints were filed by George Wood and Raymond Veedon
against Ionatron and its founders. Each of the class actions were filed in
the
United States District Court for the District of Arizona and allege, among
other
things, violations of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, claiming that the Company issued false and misleading statements
concerning the development of its counter IED product. The cases will be
consolidated, and a consolidated amended complaint will be served. We are unable
to evaluate the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or estimate the range
of
potential loss, if any. However, the Company intends to defend itself vigorously
in any legal proceedings.
In
September 2006, a derivative action was filed by John T. Johnasen in Arizona
State Court, Pima County against certain of the Company’s officers and directors
alleging, among other claims, breach of fiduciary duty. The court has stayed
the
derivative action pending a decision on the Company’s anticipated motion to
dismiss the consolidated amended complaint in the class action described
above.
In
addition, we may from time to time be involved in legal proceedings arising
from
the normal course of business. As of the date of this report, we have not
received notice of any other legal proceedings.
ITEM
2 UNREGISTERED
SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2006, the Company issued
278,249 shares of common stock upon exercise of outstanding options and warrants
to employees, directors and consultants in addition to shares of common stock
issued upon exercise of options granted under stock option plans and stock
incentive plans. The securities were issued pursuant to an exemption from
registration pursuant to Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of
1933.
25
ITEM
6 EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT
NUMBER
|
DESCRIPTION
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive pursuant to Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32.1
|
Chief
Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
32.2
|
Chief
Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
26
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
IONATRON, INC. | ||
|
|
|
By: | /s/ Dana A, Marshall | |
Dana A. Marshall | ||
Chief Executive Officer and President |
Date:
November 9, 2006
27