APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC. - Quarter Report: 2006 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
x Quarterly
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For
the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2006
OR
o Transition
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
For
the
transition period from __________ to __________
Commission
File Number 001-14015
IONATRON,
INC.
Delaware
|
77-0262908
|
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
|
(IRS
Employer Identification Number)
|
3716
East Columbia Street
Tucson,
Arizona
|
85714
(Zip
Code)
|
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code
|
(520)
628-7415
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See
definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
Accelerated Filer o
|
Accelerated
Filer x
|
Non-Accelerated
Filer o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act)
Yes
o
No x
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common
equity, as of the latest practicable date. As of July 31, 2006 there were
73,322,547 shares of the issuer's common stock, par value $.001 per share,
outstanding.
IONATRON,
INC.
June
30,
2006
PART
I -
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1-
|
Consolidated
Financial Statements
|
||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2006 (Unaudited) and December 31,
2005
|
3
|
||
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2006
and
2005 (Unaudited)
|
4
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2006
and
2005
(Unaudited)
|
5
|
||
Consolidated
Statement of Stockholders' Equity for the six months ended June
30, 2006
(Unaudited)
|
6
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2006
and
2005
(Unaudited)
|
7
|
||
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
8
|
||
Item
2-
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
17
|
|
Item
3-
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
22
|
|
Item
4-
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
22
|
|
PART
II -
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
23
|
|
Item
1-
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
23
|
|
Item
1a-
|
Risk
Factors
|
23
|
|
Item
2-
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
23
|
|
Item
4-
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
23
|
|
Item
6-
|
Exhibits
|
24
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
25
|
-2-
PART
I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
IONATRON,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
June
30, 2006
|
December
31, 2005
|
||||||
ASSETS
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Audited)
|
|||||
Current
assets
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
123,174
|
$
|
371,248
|
|||
Accounts
receivable - net
|
2,856,900
|
5,367,691
|
|||||
Inventory
|
2,229,029
|
1,348,700
|
|||||
Securities
available-for-sale
|
9,000,000
|
12,000,000
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and deposits
|
641,960
|
486,478
|
|||||
Other
receivables
|
14,864
|
20,085
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
14,865,927
|
19,594,202
|
|||||
Property
and equipment - net
|
2,421,151
|
1,732,796
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
65,813
|
50,449
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
1,487,884
|
1,487,884
|
|||||
Intangible
assets - net
|
762,900
|
787,500
|
|||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$
|
19,603,675
|
$
|
23,652,831
|
|||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
916,526
|
$
|
997,589
|
|||
Accrued
expenses
|
511,779
|
500,656
|
|||||
Accrued
compensation
|
406,716
|
391,867
|
|||||
Withholding
taxes payable
|
29,062
|
45
|
|||||
Insurance
premium financing
|
27,467
|
216,043
|
|||||
Billings
in excess of costs
|
54,901
|
84,208
|
|||||
Current
portion of capital lease obligations
|
45,333
|
37,617
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
1,991,784
|
2,228,025
|
|||||
Capital
lease obligations
|
54,441
|
62,290
|
|||||
Deferred
tax liabilities
|
68,390
|
47,991
|
|||||
Deferred
rent
|
97,463
|
82,623
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
2,212,078
|
2,420,929
|
|||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|||||||
Stockholders’
equity
|
|||||||
Series
A Convertible Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 2,000,000 shares
authorized and 710,000 shares
issued
and outstanding at June 30, 2006; 720,000 shares issued and outstanding
at
December 31, 2005.
|
710
|
720
|
|||||
Common
stock, $.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 73,367,353
shares
issued and outstanding
at
June 30, 2006; 71,996,111 shares issued and outstanding at December
31,
2005
|
73,367
|
71,996
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
33,423,724
|
28,044,794
|
|||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(16,106,204
|
)
|
(6,885,608
|
)
|
|||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
17,391,597
|
21,231,902
|
|||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
$
|
19,603,675
|
$
|
23,652,831
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)
-3-
IONATRON,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
For
the three months ended
June
30,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
1,997,170
|
$
|
3,956,522
|
|||
Cost
of revenue
|
2,023,231
|
3,775,826
|
|||||
Gross
profit (loss)
|
(26,061
|
)
|
180,696
|
||||
Operating
expenses:
|
|||||||
General
and administrative
|
3,594,220
|
1,345,807
|
|||||
Selling
and marketing
|
126,291
|
95,133
|
|||||
Research
and development
|
1,201,179
|
385,656
|
|||||
Total
operating expenses
|
4,921,690
|
1,826,596
|
|||||
Operating
loss
|
(4,947,751
|
)
|
(1,645,900
|
)
|
|||
Other
(expense) income
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
(4,120
|
)
|
(58,102
|
)
|
|||
Interest
income
|
111,982
|
10,099
|
|||||
Other
|
35
|
(7,500
|
)
|
||||
Total
other
|
107,897
|
(55,503
|
)
|
||||
Loss
before provision for income taxes
|
(4,839,854
|
)
|
(1,701,403
|
)
|
|||
Provision
for income taxes
|
10,603
|
9,293
|
|||||
Net
loss
|
(4,850,457
|
)
|
(1,710,696
|
)
|
|||
Preferred
stock dividends
|
(303,663
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Net
loss attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
(5,154,120
|
)
|
$
|
(1,710,696
|
)
|
|
Net
loss per common share – basic and diluted
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
Weighted
average number of shares outstanding, basic and diluted
|
73,272,731
|
71,212,062
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)
-4-
IONATRON,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
For
the six months ended
June
30,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
7,071,997
|
$
|
6,526,793
|
|||
Cost
of revenue
|
6,790,409
|
6,180,312
|
|||||
Gross
profit
|
281,588
|
346,481
|
|||||
Operating
expenses:
|
|||||||
General
and administrative
|
6,215,716
|
2,869,011
|
|||||
Selling
and marketing
|
275,249
|
230,662
|
|||||
Research
and development
|
2,276,246
|
491,646
|
|||||
Total
operating expenses
|
8,767,211
|
3,591,319
|
|||||
Operating
loss
|
(8,485,623
|
)
|
(3,244,838
|
)
|
|||
Other
(expense) income
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
(9,363
|
)
|
(116,179
|
)
|
|||
Interest
income
|
224,102
|
21,001
|
|||||
Other
|
44
|
592
|
|||||
Total
other
|
214,783
|
(94,586
|
)
|
||||
Loss
before provision for income taxes
|
(8,270,840
|
)
|
(3,339,424
|
)
|
|||
Provision
for income taxes
|
21,902
|
18,870
|
|||||
Net
loss
|
(8,292,742
|
)
|
(3,358,294
|
)
|
|||
Preferred
stock dividends
|
(607,323
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Net
loss attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
(8,900,065
|
)
|
$
|
(3,358,294
|
)
|
|
Net
loss per common share – basic and diluted
|
$
|
(0.12
|
)
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
Weighted
average number of shares outstanding, basic and diluted
|
72,726,740
|
71,091,456
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)
-5-
IONATRON,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
FOR
THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006
(Unaudited)
Common
Stock
|
Preferred
Stock
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
APIC
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||
Balance
as of December
31, 2005
|
71,996,111
|
$
|
71,996
|
720,000
|
$
|
720
|
$
|
28,044,794
|
$
|
(6,885,608
|
)
|
$
|
21,231,902
|
|||||||||
Exercise
of stock options and warrants
|
1,258,689
|
1,259
|
—
|
—
|
2,463,629
|
—
|
2,464,888
|
|||||||||||||||
Options
issued for services performed
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
55,284
|
—
|
55,284
|
|||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
1,932,265
|
—
|
1,932,265
|
|||||||||||||||
Preferred
stock converted into common stock
|
20,833
|
21
|
(10,000
|
)
|
(10
|
)
|
(11
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Preferred
stock dividend paid May
1, 2006
|
46,914
|
47
|
—
|
—
|
624,144
|
(624,191
|
)
|
—
|
||||||||||||||
Preferred
stock dividend paid
August 1, 2006
|
44,806
|
44
|
—
|
—
|
303,619
|
(303,663
|
)
|
—
|
||||||||||||||
Net
loss for the six months ended
June 30, 2006
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(8,292,742
|
)
|
(8,292,742
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
Balance
as of June 30, 2006
|
73,367,353
|
$
|
73,367
|
710,000
|
$
|
710
|
$
|
33,423,724
|
$
|
(16,106,204
|
)
|
$
|
17,391,597
|
-6-
IONATRON,
INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
For
the six months ended
June
30,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(8,292,742
|
)
|
$
|
(3,358,294
|
)
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
442,717
|
595,713
|
|||||
Loss
(gain) on equipment disposal
|
(5,585
|
)
|
58,825
|
||||
Deferred
income tax provision
|
20,399
|
19,154
|
|||||
Provision
for doubtful accounts
|
27,811
|
—
|
|||||
Provision
for obsolete inventory
|
216,454
|
—
|
|||||
Non-cash
stock based compensation expense
|
1,932,265
|
—
|
|||||
Stock
and option compensation
|
55,284
|
145,981
|
|||||
Increases
in other assets
|
(15,364
|
)
|
(22,225
|
)
|
|||
Changes
in working capital components:
|
|||||||
Decrease
in accounts receivable
|
2,482,980
|
1,827,154
|
|||||
(Increase)
decrease in other receivables
|
5,221
|
(8,469
|
)
|
||||
(Increase)
in inventory
|
(1,523,487
|
)
|
(686,878
|
)
|
|||
(Increase)
in prepaid expenses and deposits
|
(155,482
|
)
|
(3,823
|
)
|
|||
Increase
(decrease) in accounts payable
|
(81,063
|
)
|
118,054
|
||||
Increase
(decrease) in billings in excess of costs
|
(29,307
|
)
|
19,347
|
||||
Decrease
in accrued expenses
|
(118,747
|
)
|
(340,612
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(5,038,646
|
)
|
(1,636,073
|
)
|
|||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Purchase
of equipment
|
(660,329
|
)
|
(645,291
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from sale of available-for-sale marketable securities
|
3,500,000
|
500,000
|
|||||
Purchases
of available-for-sale marketable securities
|
(500,000
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Proceeds
from disposal of equipment
|
6,000
|
—
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
2,345,671
|
(145,291
|
)
|
||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Principal
payments on capital lease obligations
|
(19,987
|
)
|
(9,441
|
)
|
|||
Exercise
of stock options and warrants
|
2,464,888
|
411,053
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
2,444,901
|
401,612
|
|||||
Net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(248,074
|
)
|
(1,379,752
|
)
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
371,248
|
2,495,779
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$
|
123,174
|
$
|
1,116,027
|
See
non-cash investing and financing activities at Note 13
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)
-7-
1. NATURE
OF OPERATIONS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
NATURE
OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS:
Ionatron,
Inc. (“Ionatron”) was formed on June 3, 2002 to develop and market products and
systems based on Laser Guided Energy (“LGE”™) technologies. We produce LGE
products for specific U.S. Government customer applications and platforms and
develop LGE and high-voltage technologies into other viable industrial and
commercial applications. We expect to incorporate our proprietary technologies
into Directed Energy systems and products to be developed for use by a range
of
U.S. Government customers. Ionatron and various U.S. Government organizations
have entered into several contracts for products and services as well as
Cooperative Research and Development Agreements for joint research on Laser
Induced Plasma Channel ("LIPC"™) based directed energy technologies. We expect
to offer U.S. Government approved versions of our products and/or systems that
incorporate our technology and products for commercial security applications
in
the future.
From
the
company’s inception to the present, Ionatron has been engaged in research and
development and business development activities. Our technologies support both
lethal and non-lethal applications, including products under development
incorporating lasers, high voltage and other innovative technologies, many
of
which are subject to our patents. In 2005, in response to a heightened threat
and at the request of a government customer, we developed both major components
and a system that can counter Improvised Explosive Devices (“IEDs”) which
constitute a major threat in several areas of war. The company has also entered
into teaming agreements with other defense contractors to advance the use of
our
LGE technology.
Through
our wholly owned subsidiary, North Star Power Engineering, Inc. (“North Star”),
we are engaged in the business of designing and manufacturing a broad range
of
customized, high performance electrical equipment for the defense, aerospace,
semi-conductor and medical industries. North Star also produces proprietary
technology directly for Ionatron applications. The company is continually
exploring ways to apply and advance its unique technologies to provide
commercially viable products in a range of worldwide markets.
BASIS
OF PRESENTATION
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ionatron and our
wholly owned subsidiaries, Ionatron Technologies, Inc. and North Star as of
June
30, 2006 (collectively, "Company," "Ionatron," "we," "our" and “us”).
All
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. In the opinion
of
management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments)
necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods
presented have been made. For comparative purposes, we have reclassified prior
year rent deposits to long term other assets to conform to current year
presentations. The results for the six-month period ended June 30, 2006, may
not
be indicative of the results for the entire year. The interim unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the Company's audited consolidated financial statements contained in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
USE
OF ESTIMATES
Our
consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP), which require
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported
in
the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We have identified
significant accounting policies that require a higher degree of judgment and
complexity. See Note 1
to the
Company's audited consolidated financial statements contained in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K, which should be read in conjunction with these financial
statements.
2. RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In
July
2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB
Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the
recognition threshold and measurement of a tax position taken on a tax return.
FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. FIN
48
also requires expanded disclosure with respect to the uncertainty in income
taxes. We are currently evaluating the requirements of FIN 48 and the impact
this interpretation may have on our financial statements.
-8-
3. STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
Stock
Options - Employees and Directors
We
have a
number of stock-based employee compensation plans. We have the ability to grant
stock options for a fixed number of shares or restricted stock grants to
employees and directors. Awards under the plans vest over periods ranging from
immediate vesting to four years, depending upon the type of award or attainment
of specified performance criteria. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company
adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”)
No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”). SFAS 123(R) establishes
accounting for stock-based awards exchanged for employee services. Accordingly,
stock-based compensation cost is measured at grant date, based on the fair
value
of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the employee’s requisite
service period.
We
previously accounted for our employee stock option awards under the intrinsic
value based method of accounting prescribed by APB Opinion 25, “Accounting for
Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations, including FASB
Interpretation No. 44 “Accounting for Certain Transactions Including Stock
Compensation, an interpretation of APB Opinion 25.” Under the intrinsic value
based method, compensation cost is the excess of the quoted market price of
the
stock at grant date or other measurement date over the amount an employee must
pay to acquire the stock. We had adopted the disclosure-only provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation,” as amended by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure.”
Accordingly, no compensation cost had been recognized for employee stock option
grants that did not have an intrinsic value at the time of grant.
We
adopted the modified prospective application method as provided by SFAS 123(R).
Under this method, SFAS 123(R) is applied to stock-based compensation made
after
the effective date. Additionally, compensation cost for the portion of awards
for which the requisite service has not been rendered, such as unvested stock
options, that are outstanding as of the date of adoption will be recognized
as
the remaining requisite services are rendered. The compensation cost relating
to
unvested awards at the date of adoption will be based on the grant-date fair
value for those awards.
The
fair
value of each option is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option valuation model. We estimate expected stock price volatility based on
historical volatility within a representative peer group. We estimate expected
life and forfeiture rates. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the
contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield for
comparable periods.
We
recognized non-cash employee stock-based compensation expense of approximately
$832,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and $1,932,000 for the
six
months ended June 30, 2006. There is no related income tax benefit recognized
in
the condensed consolidated statements of operations recorded for the three
and
six months ended June 30, 2006 because our deferred tax assets are fully offset
by a valuation allowance. The estimated fair value of our stock options,
less expected forfeitures, is amortized over the awards’ and restricted stock
grants’ expected service period on a straight-line basis.
The
modified prospective transition method of SFAS 123(R) requires the presentation
of pro forma information, for periods presented prior to the adoption of SFAS
123(R), regarding net loss and net loss per share as if we had accounted for
our
stock plans under the fair value method of SFAS 123(R). For pro forma purposes,
the fair value of stock options was estimated using the Black-Scholes option
valuation model and amortized on a straight-line basis. The pro forma
amounts are as follows:
-9-
For
the three months ended June 30, 2005
|
For
the six months
ended June 30, 2005 |
||||||
Net
loss:
|
|||||||
As
reported
|
$
|
(1,710,696
|
)
|
$
|
(3,358,294
|
)
|
|
Pro
forma stock compensation expense
|
(722,959
|
)
|
(2,810,427
|
)
|
|||
Pro
forma
|
$
|
(2,433,655
|
)
|
$
|
(6,168,721
|
)
|
|
|
|||||||
Net
loss per share – basic and diluted:
|
|||||||
As
reported
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
$
|
(0.05
|
)
|
|
Pro
forma
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
$
|
(0.09
|
)
|
The
fair
value of our stock options granted in the three months ended June 30, 2006
and
2005 was estimated at the date of grant using the following
assumptions:
Six
Months Ended June 30
|
|||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||||
Expected
life (years)
|
2.5
years
|
5.0
years
|
|||||||||||
Dividend
yield
|
0.0%
|
0.0%
|
|||||||||||
From
|
To
|
From
|
To
|
||||||||||
Expected
volatility
|
38.44%
|
|
40.24%
|
|
62.0%
|
|
75.0%
|
|
|||||
Risk
free interest rates
|
4.57%
|
|
4.96%
|
|
3.29%
|
|
3.31%
|
|
The
following table summarizes the activity of our stock option plans for the six
months ended June 30, 2006:
Shares
|
Weighted
Average ExercisePrice |
Aggregate Intrinsic
Value |
||||||||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2005
|
3,481,615
|
$
|
4.30
|
|||||||
Granted
|
2,690,850
|
$
|
7.85
|
|||||||
Exercised
|
(1,357,635
|
)
|
$
|
2.72
|
||||||
Forfeited
|
(450,107
|
)
|
$
|
9.26
|
||||||
Outstanding
at June 30, 2006
|
4,364,723
|
$
|
6.55
|
$
|
13,891,071
|
|||||
Exercisable
at June 30, 2006
|
1,821,404
|
$
|
5.14
|
$
|
8,247,477
|
As
of
June 30, 2006, there was approximately $6.0 million of unrecognized compensation
cost related to unvested stock options granted and outstanding, net of estimated
forfeitures. The cost is expected to be recognized on a weighted average basis
over a period of approximately two years.
Stock
Options and Warrants - Non Employees
Compensation
expense recorded for shares and options issued to non-employees for the three
months ended June 30, 2005 and 2006 was approximately $51,000 and $28,000
respectively, which was charged to operating expenses with an offsetting entry
to additional paid-in capital. Compensation expense recorded for shares and
options issued to non-employees for the six month period ended June 30, 2005
and
2006 was approximately $146,000 and $55,000 respectively, which was charged
to
operating expenses with an offsetting entry to additional paid in
capital.
-10-
4. ACCOUNTS
RECEIVABLE
Accounts
receivable consist of the following at:
|
June
30, 2006
|
December
31, 2005
|
|||||
Contracts
in progress
|
$
|
867,522
|
$
|
3,375,104
|
|||
Retained
|
100,000
|
100,000
|
|||||
Cost
and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts
|
1,896,607
|
1,931,434
|
|||||
2,864,129
|
5,406,538
|
||||||
Less:
|
|||||||
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
7,229
|
38,847
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
2,856,900
|
$
|
5,367,691
|
Contract
receivables at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 are expected to be collected
within 60 days. There are no claims or unapproved change orders included in
contract receivables presented. The allowance for doubtful accounts represents
an estimate for potentially uncollectible accounts receivable related to
non-governmental customers which is based upon a review of the individual
accounts outstanding and the Company’s prior history of uncollectible accounts
receivable.
Costs
and Estimated Earnings on Uncompleted Contracts
|
|||||||
June
30, 2006
|
December
31, 2005
|
||||||
Cost
incurred on uncompleted contracts
|
$
|
21,848,888
|
$
|
14,457,299
|
|||
Estimated
earnings
|
1,584,569
|
1,122,673
|
|||||
Total
billable costs and estimated earnings
|
23,433,457
|
15,579,972
|
|||||
Less:
|
|||||||
Billings
to date
|
21,591,751
|
13,732,746
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
1,841,706
|
$
|
1,847,226
|
|||
Included
in accompanying balance sheet under the following
captions:
|
|||||||
Unbilled
costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts included
in accounts
receivable
|
$
|
1,896,607
|
$
|
1,931,434
|
|||
Billings
in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted
contracts
|
(54,901
|
)
|
(84,208
|
)
|
|||
Total
|
$
|
1,841,706
|
$
|
1,847,226
|
5. INVENTORY
Inventories,
consisting of materials, assemblies and sub-assemblies, are stated at average
cost. Manufactured products (work-in-process) include the costs of materials,
labor and manufacturing and administrative overhead. Our inventories consist
of
the following at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005:
June
30, 2006
|
December
31, 2005
|
||||||
Materials
|
$
|
1,779,240
|
$
|
815,788
|
|||
Work-in-process
|
449,789
|
532,912
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
2,229,029
|
$
|
1,348,700
|
-11-
Rapid
technological change and new product introductions and enhancements could result
in excess or obsolete inventory. To minimize this risk, the Company evaluates
inventory levels and expected usage on a periodic basis.
6. SECURITIES
AVAILABLE FOR SALE
Our
investments are classified as available-for-sale and are reported at fair value,
with unrealized gains or losses, net of tax recorded in stockholders’ equity.
Fair value for these securities is based on quoted market prices. The cost
of
investments sold is based on the specific identification method. Realized gains
or losses on the sale or exchange of investments and declines in value judged
to
be other than temporary are recorded as gains or losses in the statement of
operations. We consider numerous factors when assessing impairment on
investments; however, in general, investments are judged to be impaired if
the
fair value is less than cost continuously for nine months, absent compelling
evidence to the contrary. Unrealized gains and losses are determined at each
balance sheet date and are recorded in other comprehensive income, if
applicable.
Available-for-sale
securities consist of the following as of June 30, 2006 and December 31,
2005:
June
30, 2006
|
December
31, 2005
|
||||||
Asset
Backed Securities Repriced Monthly
|
$
|
3,000,000
|
$
|
3,000,000
|
|||
Municipal
Bonds
|
4,500,000
|
5,500,000
|
|||||
Total
Debt Securities
|
7,500,000
|
8,500,000
|
|||||
Preferred
stock
|
1,500,000
|
3,500,000
|
|||||
Total
Equity Securities
|
1,500,000
|
3,500,000
|
|||||
Total
available-for-sale securities
|
$
|
9,000,000
|
$
|
12,000,000
|
As
of
June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, there were no unrealized gains or losses
relative to the above securities.
7.
ACCRUED
EXPENSES
Accrued
expenses consisted of the following at:
June
30, 2006
|
December
31, 2005
|
||||||
Accrued
professional fees
|
$
|
30,000
|
$
|
123,000
|
|||
Overdraft
|
—
|
87,698
|
|||||
Property
taxes
|
38,681
|
—
|
|||||
Additional
relocation costs
|
77,285
|
—
|
|||||
Other
accrued
|
365,813
|
289,958
|
|||||
Total
accrued expenses
|
$
|
511,779
|
$
|
500,656
|
8. INCOME
TAXES
We
account for income taxes under an asset and liability approach that requires
the
expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between book and
tax
bases of assets and liabilities to be recognized as deferred tax assets and
liabilities. During the first quarter of 2004, we established a full valuation
allowance against our deferred tax assets because we determined it is more
likely than not that these deferred tax assets will not be realized in the
foreseeable future. Included in the deferred tax asset is a portion that is
attributable to losses that were incurred prior to a “change in ownership” as
defined by Internal Revenue Code rules. The amount that can be utilized each
year is fixed; however, annual limitation amounts not previously utilized carry
over to subsequent years and can be utilized to the extent of the total
unexpired NOL carryforward amount. The pre-change of control NOL carryforwards
will begin to expire in 2020.
-12-
For
the
three and six months ended June 30, 2006, we recorded provisions for income
taxes of approximately $11,000 and $22,000, respectively due to an increase
in
deferred tax liabilities as a result of the tax amortization of goodwill related
to the North Star Acquisition.
9. SIGNIFICANT
CUSTOMERS
The
substantial majority of our customers are either the U.S. Government or
contractors to the U.S. Government and represent approximately 96% and 98%
of
revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
10. NET
LOSS PER SHARE
Basic
loss per share is computed as net loss attributable to common stockholders
divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the
period. Diluted loss per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur
from common shares issuable through exercise of stock options and warrants.
The
dilutive effect of options and warrants, which were not included in the total
of
diluted shares because the effect was antidilutive, was 1,897,252 and 2,839,000
shares for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively and
1,741,840 and 2,729,433 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
11. DIVIDENDS
On
June
21, 2006, the Board of Directors declared the 6.5% dividend payable on August
1,
2006 to the holders of our Series A Redeemable Cumulative Preferred Stock and
that the dividend will be paid in shares of our common stock to the holders
of
record on July 15, 2006. Dividends on Preferred Stock are accrued when the
Board
of Directors declares the dividend. To record the June 21, 2006 declaration
we
recorded a non-cash dividend in the amount of approximately $304,000. The
recording of the dividend had no effect on our cash or net equity. Dividends
on
our Preferred Stock are payable quarterly on the first day of February, May,
August and November, in cash or shares of Common Stock, at the discretion of
the
Company.
12. COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
OPERATING
LEASES
In
Tucson, Arizona, we lease office, manufacturing and storage space under four
non-cancellable operating lease agreements. Our primary research and prototype
facility is leased at an annual rental of $330,000 from a company that is
partially owned by principal stockholders. This lease expires in November 2012,
contains renewal options and an escalation provision at the end of 2007 that
increases our annual rent by $49,500. We account for the escalation provision
by
straight-lining the rent expense. On September 16, 2005 we took possession
of
additional manufacturing space at an annual rental of $48,682 under a
non-cancelable operating lease agreement that expires on September 30, 2006.
In
January 2006, we consolidated executive and administrative offices into one
location proximate to our Tucson research and prototype facilities under a
renewable 11-month operating lease, with monthly rent of approximately $9,400.
We have exercised our option to renew this lease for a three-year period
beginning December 1, 2006. In connection with the relocation of our North
Star
operations, on June 1, 2006 we commenced a 3-year non-cancellable, renewable
operating lease at an annual rent of approximately $64,000 with annual
escalations. We are also responsible for certain property related costs,
including insurance, utilities and property taxes.
In
Albuquerque, New Mexico, we exercised the early termination provisions of our
North Star office facilities lease by providing 120 days notice on July 1,
2006
and agreeing to pay approximately $15,000 in early termination fees in
accordance with our lease agreement.
On
April
1, 2005 we took possession of office, manufacturing and warehouse facilities
at
the Stennis Space Center in Mississippi under a non-cancelable operating lease.
The lease expires in 2010 with the annual rent increasing from $266,000 in
the
first year to $280,000 in the final year for an aggregate commitment of
$1,367,000. We account for the escalation provision by straight-lining the
rent
expense. The lease may be renewed three times in five-year increments.
-13-
We
also
lease vehicles under non-cancelable operating lease agreements to facilitate
our
material purchasing activities. These lease commitments total approximately
$1,062 per month. We are responsible for registration, licensing and insurance
costs.
Rent
expense was approximately $257,000 and $175,000 for the three months ended
June
30, 2006 and 2005 respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2006 and
2005,
rent expense was approximately $540,000 and $302,000, respectively. Rent expense
includes lease payments and lease related expenses including rental taxes,
passed-through property taxes, common-area maintenance charges and certain
utilities that are not separately metered and billed.
Future
annual minimum lease payments under these operating lease agreements are as
follows:
Years
ending December 31,
|
Amount
|
|||
2006
|
$
|
450,416
|
||
2007
|
759,728
|
|||
2008
|
812,565
|
|||
2009
|
777,893
|
|||
2010
|
457,600
|
|||
Thereafter
|
711,563
|
|||
Total
|
$
|
3,969,765
|
CAPITAL
LEASES
We
rent
office equipment under capital lease agreements with approximately $2,078 in
monthly payments. We also rent two vehicles for use in our operations under
capital lease agreements with approximately $2,155 in monthly payments.
Future
annual minimum lease payments under these leases are:
Years
ending December 31,
|
Amount
|
|||
Remaining
six months of 2006
|
$
|
25,405
|
||
2007
|
50,810
|
|||
2008
|
29,309
|
|||
2009
|
2,044
|
|||
Total
payments
|
107,568
|
|||
Less:
interest
|
(7,794
|
)
|
||
Total
principal
|
99,774
|
|||
Less:
Current portion of capital lease obligations
|
45,333
|
|||
Long-term
capital lease obligations
|
$
|
54,441
|
GUARANTEES
We
agree
to indemnify our officers and directors for certain events or occurrences
arising as a result of the officers or directors serving in such capacity.
The
term of the indemnification period is for the officer's or director's lifetime.
The maximum amount of future payments that we could be required to make under
these indemnification agreements is unlimited. However, we maintain a director's
and officer’s liability insurance policy that limits our exposure and enables us
to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. As a result, we believe the
estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements is minimal because
of
our insurance coverage and we have not recognized any liabilities for these
agreements as of June 30, 2006 and 2005.
-14-
LITIGATION
In
July
2006, two purported class action complaints were filed by George Wood and
Raymond Veedon against Ionatron and its founders. Each of the class actions
were
filed in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona and
allege, among other things, violations of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, claiming that the Company issued false and
misleading statements concerning the development of its counter IED product.
As
of the date of this report we have not been served with either complaint. We
are
unable to evaluate the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or estimate the
range of potential loss, if any. However, the company intends to defend itself
vigorously in any legal proceedings.
In
addition, we may from time to time be involved in legal proceedings arising
from
the normal course of business. As of the date of this report, we have not
received notice of any other legal proceedings.
13. SUPPLEMENTAL
CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
|||||||
Interest
|
$
|
9,363
|
$
|
58,077
|
|||
Income
taxes
|
1,100
|
—
|
|||||
Non-cash
Investing and Financing Activities:
|
|||||||
Capital
lease obligations incurred for use of equipment
|
19,854
|
50,777
|
|||||
Common
stock issued for the payment of preferred stock dividends
|
927,854
|
—
|
|||||
Assets
transferred from inventory to property and equipment
|
426,704
|
—
|
-15-
14. INDUSTRY
SEGMENTS
The
Company is currently engaged in developing and marketing through two distinct
segments: (1) Ionatron, where the focus is on LGE technology products for sale
and (2) North Star, where the focus is on the manufacture of customized
electrical equipment for sale in a more broad-based market.
Selected
Financial Data for the Three Months Ended June 30,
2006
Business Segment |
|
Revenues
|
Depreciation
and Amortization
|
Interest
Income
|
Interest
Expense
|
Net
(Loss)
|
Capital
Expenditures
|
Identifiable
Assets
|
||||||||||||||
Ionatron
|
$
|
1,882,908
|
$
|
203,773
|
$
|
111,949
|
$
|
3,936
|
$
|
(4,176,278
|
)
|
$
|
289,595
|
$
|
20,881,617
|
|||||||
North
Star
|
162,196
|
25,777
|
33
|
184
|
(674,179
|
)
|
33,827
|
2,781,662
|
||||||||||||||
Total
Company
|
2,045,104
|
229,550
|
111,982
|
4,120
|
(4,850,457
|
)
|
323,422
|
23,663,279
|
||||||||||||||
Intersegment
|
(47,934
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(1,644,604
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
Investment
in Sub
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(2,415,000
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Consolidated
Company
|
$
|
1,997,170
|
$
|
229,550
|
$
|
111,982
|
$
|
4,120
|
$
|
(4,850,457
|
)
|
$
|
323,422
|
$
|
19,603,675
|
Selected
Financial Data for the Six Months Ended June 30,
2006
Business Segment |
Revenues
|
Depreciation
and
Amortization |
Interest
Income
|
Interest
Expense
|
Net
(Loss)
|
Capital
Expenditures |
|||||||||||||
Ionatron
|
$
|
6,672,224
|
$
|
391,614
|
$
|
223,640
|
$
|
8,986
|
$
|
(6,970,312
|
)
|
$
|
620,822
|
||||||
North
Star
|
774,002
|
51,103
|
462
|
377
|
(1,322,430
|
)
|
59,361
|
||||||||||||
Total
Company
|
7,446,226
|
442,717
|
224,102
|
9,363
|
(8,292,742
|
)
|
680,183
|
||||||||||||
Intersegment
|
(374,229
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Consolidated
Company
|
$
|
7,071,997
|
$
|
442,717
|
$
|
224,102
|
$
|
9,363
|
$
|
(8,292,742
|
)
|
$
|
680,183
|
Selected
Financial Data for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2005
Business
Segment
|
|
Revenues
|
|
Depreciation
and
Amortization
|
|
Interest
Income
|
|
Interest
Expense
|
|
Net
(Loss)
|
|
Capital
Expenditures
|
|
Identifiable
Assets |
||||||||
Ionatron
|
$
|
3,518,772
|
$
|
290,364
|
$
|
9,737
|
$
|
57,618
|
$
|
(1,756,228
|
)
|
$
|
426,877
|
$
|
9,532,085
|
|||||||
North
Star
|
614,117
|
29,774
|
362
|
484
|
45,532
|
10,015
|
3,037,940
|
|||||||||||||||
Total
Company
|
4,132,889
|
320,138
|
10,099
|
58,102
|
(1,710,696
|
)
|
436,892
|
12,570,025
|
||||||||||||||
Intersegment
|
(176,367
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(561,115
|
)
|
|||||||||||||
Investment
in Sub
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(2,415,000
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Consolidated
Company
|
$
|
3,956,522
|
$
|
320,138
|
$
|
10,099
|
$
|
58,102
|
$
|
(1,710,696
|
)
|
$
|
436,892
|
$
|
9,593,910
|
Selected
Financial Data for the Six Months Ended June 30,
2005
Business Segment |
Revenues
|
Depreciation
and Amortization
|
Interest Income |
Interest Expense |
Net (Loss) |
Capital
Expenditures |
|||||||||||||
Ionatron
|
$
|
5,881,919
|
$
|
536,334
|
$
|
20,219
|
$
|
115,596
|
$
|
(3,257,299
|
)
|
$
|
654,858
|
||||||
North
Star
|
960,325
|
59,379
|
782
|
583
|
(100,995
|
)
|
41,210
|
||||||||||||
Total
Company
|
6,842,244
|
595,713
|
21,001
|
116,179
|
(3,358,294
|
)
|
696,068
|
||||||||||||
Intersegment
|
(315,451
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Consolidated
Company
|
$
|
6,526,793
|
$
|
595,713
|
$
|
21,001
|
$
|
116,179
|
$
|
(3,358,294
|
)
|
$
|
696,068
|
-16-
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
Our
discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations
should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial
statements and the related disclosures included elsewhere herein and in
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations included as part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended
December 31, 2005.
CAUTIONARY
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain
statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the securities laws. Forward-looking statements
include all statements that do not relate solely to the historical or current
facts, and can be identified by the use of forward looking words such as "may",
"believe", "will", "expect", "expected", "project", "anticipate", "anticipated
estimates", "plans", "strategy", "target", "prospects" or "continue". These
forward looking statements are based on the current plans and expectations
of
our management and are subject to a number of uncertainties and risks that
could
significantly affect our current plans and expectations, as well as future
results of operations and financial condition and may cause our actual results,
performances or achievements to be materially different from any future results,
performances or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements. Important factors that could cause our actual results to differ
materially from our expectations are described Item 1A. (Risk Factors) of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. In making
these
forward-looking statements, we claim the protection of the safe-harbor for
forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Reform Act of
1995. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such
forward-looking statements are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such
expectations will prove to have been correct. We do not assume any obligation
to
update these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes
in
assumptions, or changes in other factors affecting such forward-looking
statements.
OVERVIEW
Ionatron,
Inc. (“Ionatron”) was formed on June 3, 2002 to develop and market products and
systems based on Laser Guided Energy (“LGE”™) technologies. We produce LGE
products for specific U.S. Government customer applications and platforms and
develop LGE and high-voltage technologies into other viable industrial and
commercial applications. We expect to incorporate our proprietary technologies
into Directed Energy systems and products to be developed for use by a range
of
U.S. Government customers. Ionatron and various U.S. Government organizations
have entered into several contracts for products and services as well as
Cooperative Research and Development Agreements for joint research on Laser
Induced Plasma Channel ("LIPC"™) based directed energy technologies. We expect
to offer U.S. Government approved versions of our products and/or systems that
incorporate our technology and products for commercial security applications
in
the future.
From
the
company’s inception to the present, Ionatron has been engaged in research and
development and business development activities. Our technologies support both
lethal and non-lethal applications, including products under development
incorporating lasers, high voltage and other innovative technologies, many
of
which are subject to our patents. In 2005, in response to a heightened threat
and at the request of a government customer, we developed both major components
and a system that can counter Improvised Explosive Devices (“IEDs”) which
constitute a major threat in several areas of war. The company has also entered
into teaming agreements with other defense contractors to advance the use of
our
LGE technology.
Through
our wholly owned subsidiary, North Star Power Engineering, Inc. (“North Star”),
we are engaged in the business of designing and manufacturing a broad range
of
customized, high performance electrical equipment for the defense, aerospace,
semi-conductor and medical industries. North Star also produces proprietary
technology directly for Ionatron applications. The company is continually
exploring ways to apply and advance its unique technologies to provide
commercially viable products in a range of worldwide markets.
Our
intellectual property strategy is directed toward establishing an integral
position for us to be involved with a broad range of products and applications
that utilize concepts, know-how, and technology invented through our own
internal funding and creativity. We believe this approach will enhance our
ability to work for the Government as well as other entities in mutually
productive collaborations. Furthermore, we believe our patent applications
can
be used as justification for sole source, non-competitive awarding of contracts
in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulations. In May 2006, we received
notification from the United States Patent and Trademark office that a patent
has been issued for applications incorporating our technologies. Presently
we
have four patents and 18 patent applications. Of the 18 patent applications,
we
have received secrecy orders on seven and expect to receive secrecy orders
on
another three. Secrecy orders are applied when the underlying technology is
deemed by the US Government to be hidden as an issue of national security,
among
other reasons. These patents and patent applications relate to our core LIPC
technology and other technologies related to LGE and high voltage
applications.
-17-
U.S.
Government support for our LGE and LIPC technologies continues through
Congressional Plus Ups to the U.S. Navy budget. Work continues on our fiscal
year 2005 contract which was delayed until the third quarter of fiscal year
2005
pending release of funds by the military awaiting passage of the Iraq
Supplemental Bill. Funding for fiscal year 2006 has been released and we
anticipate a contract award in the near future. We expect the new funding to
support continued technology development and effects testing. Additionally,
we
believe that the U.S. Government will internally transfer management of the
LIPC
transportable demonstrator project to the military. Total LIPC and LGE dedicated
funding was $11.1 million and $12.7 million for fiscal years 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
OPERATING
SEGMENTS
We
are
currently engaged in developing and marketing through two operating segments:
(1) Ionatron, where the focus is on Directed Energy Weapon technology products
for sale to the U.S. Government and (2) North Star, where the focus is on the
manufacture of customized electrical equipment for sale to a more broad-based
market.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
COMPARISON
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005 IS AS
FOLLOWS:
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
1,997,170
|
$
|
3,956,522
|
|||
Cost
of revenue
|
2,023,231
|
3,775,826
|
|||||
General
and administrative
|
3,594,220
|
1,345,807
|
|||||
Selling
and marketing
|
126,291
|
95,133
|
|||||
Research
and development
|
1,201,179
|
385,656
|
|||||
Other
(expense) income:
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
(4,120
|
)
|
(58,102
|
)
|
|||
Interest
income
|
111,982
|
10,099
|
|||||
Other
|
35
|
(7,500
|
)
|
||||
Loss
before provision for income taxes
|
(4,839,854
|
)
|
(1,701,403
|
)
|
|||
Provision
for income taxes
|
10,603
|
9,293
|
|||||
Net
loss
|
($4,850,457
|
)
|
($1,710,696
|
)
|
REVENUE
The
decrease of approximately $1,959,000 in revenue for the three months ended
June
30, 2006 compared to 2005 is attributable to the completion of certain Ionatron
government contracts, including the completion of our initial 12-unit counter
IED (“Improvised Explosive Device”) order, and an approximately eight-week
temporary interruption in North Star’s operations while we effected facility
relocation from Albuquerque to Tucson. As a result of its completion, revenue
from our initial 12-unit counter IED order project was reduced by approximately
81% in the three months ended June 30, 2006 when compared to the three months
ended March 31, 2006.
COST
OF REVENUE
Cost
of
revenue decreased approximately $1,753,000 when compared to the three months
ended June 30, 2005 due to decreased direct revenue activity. Cost of revenue
includes an allocation of general and administrative expenses and research
and
development costs in accordance with the terms of our contracts. As a result
of
the decline in revenue, the amount of allowable expenses allocable to our
projects declined thereby increasing our general and administrative costs.
In
addition, for the three months ended June 30, 2006, cost of revenue exceeded
revenue on a consolidated basis in part due to certain North Star commitments
to
external customers that were completed at a loss that was not completely offset
by Ionatron gross profit.
-18-
GENERAL
AND ADMINISTRATIVE
The
increase of approximately $2.2 million in general and administrative expenses
for the three months ended June 30, 2006 from the three months ended June 30,
2005 included the recognition of non-cash employee stock option compensation
expense of approximately $832,000 as a result of our adoption of SFAS 123(R).
One-time costs of approximately $525,000 associated with the relocation of
North
Star facilities and resettlement of North Star employees are included in this
increase. We also experienced increases in personnel costs and temporary and
contract labor costs of approximately $571,000 and $275,000 respectively, which
is attributable to our increased number of employees over the second quarter
of
2005 and our need for temporary staffing to assist in short-term projects.
We
also improved our competencies in marketing, accounting and finance by hiring
additional personnel. Through the relocation of North Star operations and
through consolidation of administrative tasks and other optimizations, we have
reduced our overall head-count from March 2006 levels and expect to realize
the
cost savings of these efficiencies going forward. Also contributing to this
increase was a reduced amount of allowable expenses allocable to our
projects.
SELLING
AND MARKETING
Selling
and marketing expenses increased by approximately $31,000 during the three
months ended June 30, 2006 from the same period in 2005 as we continue to
advance our marketing efforts aided by the addition of one staff member in
2006.
RESEARCH
AND DEVELOPMENT
Research
and development expenses increased approximately $816,000 during the three
months ended June 30, 2006 as compared to 2005 due to our continued strategic
decision to internally-fund research and development. During the three months
ended June 30, 2006, we commenced new research and development initiatives
and
continued work on our on-going research projects to expedite the advancement
of
our core LGE and LIPC technologies. Research and development projects also
include work on the vehicle-stopper technology which was derived from our core
LGE and LIPC knowledge base. These strategic decisions are designed to advance
and strengthen our intellectual property rights and progress technology
development at a rate that is less dependent on contract funding.
INTEREST
EXPENSE AND INTEREST INCOME
Interest
expense in the second quarter of 2006 decreased approximately $54,000 from
the
same period of 2005 as a result of our retirement of debt in 2005. Interest
income increased approximately $102,000 earned through our investment in
securities available for sale.
NORTH
STAR OPERATIONS
Our
consolidated financial information contains the results of North Star for the
three months ended June 30, 2006. North Star’s revenue, net of intersegment
transactions, decreased to approximately $115,000 for the three months ended
June 30, 2006 from approximately $437,000 for the same period in 2005. This
decrease is due to the relocation of North Star operations which necessitated
a
temporary suspension of operations for a period of approximately eight weeks.
North Star’s revenue activity for the quarter resulted in a negative gross
margin as we concluded certain projects for external customers that were
completed at a loss. The operations were in place in Tucson as of the end of
the
quarter and revenue-generating activities have resumed. Net income for North
Star decreased from approximately $45,000 for the three months ended June 30,
2005 to a net loss of approximately $674,000 for the same period in 2006
including approximately $525,000 of one-time relocation charges. Management
has
instituted additional management changes at the subsidiary that are intended
to
improve North Star’s financial and operational performance.
NET
LOSS
Our
operations for the three months ended June 30, 2006 resulted in a net loss
of
approximately $4.8 million, an increase in our period loss of approximately
$3.1
million when compared to the same period in 2005. This increase includes
non-cash employee stock option compensation of approximately $832,000, one-time
relocation charges of approximately $525,000 and the effect of dedicating
substantial resources to increased research and development initiatives
(research and development expenditures increased by approximately $816,000
for
the quarter).
-19-
COMPARISON
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 AND 2005 IS AS
FOLLOWS:
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
7,071,997
|
$
|
6,526,793
|
|||
Cost
of revenue
|
6,790,409
|
6,180,312
|
|||||
General
and administrative
|
6,215,716
|
2,869,011
|
|||||
Selling
and marketing
|
275,249
|
230,662
|
|||||
Research
and development
|
2,276,246
|
491,646
|
|||||
Other
(expense) income:
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
(9,363
|
)
|
(116,179
|
)
|
|||
Interest
income
|
224,102
|
21,001
|
|||||
Other
|
44
|
592
|
|||||
Loss
before provision for income taxes
|
(8,270,840
|
)
|
(3,339,424
|
)
|
|||
Provision
for income taxes
|
21,902
|
18,870
|
|||||
Net
loss
|
($8,292,742
|
)
|
($3,358,294
|
)
|
REVENUE
Consolidated
revenues for the six-month period ended June 30, 2006 increased approximately
$545,000 over the same period in 2005. These year-to-date revenues were
supported by a stronger first quarter in both Ionatron and North Star revenue
production and overall have produced a year-to-date revenue increase
notwithstanding the effects of relocating North Star operations during the
second quarter and our increased resource allocations to research and
development.
COST
OF REVENUE
Cost
of
revenue increased approximately $610,000 when compared to the six months ended
June 30, 2005 due to increased revenue activity. The gross margin percentage
associated with these costs decreased by approximately 1.33% compared to the
same period performance in 2005, in part due to the completion of certain North
Star commitments at a gross margin loss. Cost of revenue includes an allocation
of general and administrative expenses and research and development costs in
accordance with the terms of our contracts.
GENERAL
AND ADMINISTRATIVE
The
increase of approximately $3.3 million in general and administrative expenses
for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from the six months ended June 30, 2005
included the recognition of non-cash employee stock option compensation expense
of approximately $1.9 million as a result of our adoption of SFAS 123(R).
One-time costs of approximately $525,000 associated with the relocation of
North
Star facilities and resettlement of North Star employees are included in this
increase. We also experienced increases in personnel costs and temporary and
contract labor costs of approximately $900,000 and $453,000 respectively, which
is attributable to our increased number of employees over the same period of
2005 and our need for temporary staffing to assist in short-term projects and
increased competencies in marketing, finance and accounting. Also contributing
to this increase was a reduced amount of allowable expenses allocable to our
projects.
SELLING
AND MARKETING
Selling
and marketing expenses increased by approximately $45,000 during the six months
ended June 30, 2006 from the same period in 2005 as we continue to advance
our
marketing efforts through the addition of one staff member in 2006.
-20-
RESEARCH
AND DEVELOPMENT
Research
and development expenses increased approximately $1.8 million during the six
months ended June 30, 2006 as compared to 2005 due to our continued strategic
decision to internally-fund research and development. During the six months
ended June 30, 2006 we commenced new research and development initiatives and
we
continued work on our on-going research projects to expedite the advancement
of
our core LGE and LIPC technologies. Research and development projects also
include work on the vehicle-stopper technology which was derived from our core
LGE and LIPC knowledge base. These strategic decisions are designed to advance
and strengthen our intellectual property rights and progress technology
development at a rate that is less dependent on contract funding.
INTEREST
EXPENSE AND INTEREST INCOME
Interest
expense in the first six months of 2006 decreased approximately $107,000 from
the first six months of 2005 as a result of our retirement of debt in 2005.
Interest income increased approximately $203,000 earned through our investment
in securities available for sale.
NORTH
STAR OPERATIONS
Our
consolidated financial information contains the results of North Star for the
six months ended June 30, 2006. North Star’s revenue, net of intersegment
transactions, decreased to approximately $400,000 for the six months ended
June
30, 2006 from approximately $645,000 for the same period in 2005. This decrease
is due to the relocation of North Star operations which necessitated a temporary
suspension of operations of approximately eight weeks during the second quarter.
The operations were in place in Tucson as of the end of the quarter and
revenue-generating activities have resumed. Net loss for North Star increased
from approximately $101,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2005 to a net
loss
of approximately $1.3 million for the same period in 2006. The 2006 first
six-month North Star loss includes approximately $525,000 in one-time relocation
charges, and negative gross margins associated with completing certain projects.
Management has instituted additional changes at the subsidiary that are intended
to improve North Star’s financial and operational performance.
NET
LOSS
Our
operations for the six months ended June 30, 2006 resulted in a net loss of
approximately $8.3 million, an increase in our period loss of approximately
$4.9
million when compared to the same period in 2005. This increase includes
non-cash employee stock option compensation of approximately $1.9 million,
one-time relocation charges of more than $547,000 and the effect of dedicating
substantial resources to increased research and development initiatives
(research and development expenditures increased by approximately $1.8 million
for the year to date). Other general and administrative costs increased
approximately $2.8 million for expenditures associated with increased rent
and
facilities expense and an increase in staff and consulting expenses compared
to
our 2005 same period operations.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At
June
30, 2006, we had approximately $123,000 of cash and cash equivalents, a decrease
of approximately $248,000 from cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2005
of
$371,000. The reduction in cash on hand is attributable to the timing of and
reduction in accounts payable as well as our strategic cash management decisions
that result in increased interest earning. We keep sufficient cash on hand
to
service our anticipated immediate cash requirements and invest our excess cash
of $9 million in available-for-sale marketable securities and other highly
liquid investments. Our invested cash is readily available for conversion to
cash to support our ongoing requirements.
During
the first six months of 2006, we used approximately $5.0 million of cash in
operating activities. This amount is comprised of primarily of our net loss
of
$8.3 million, reduced by a decrease in accounts receivable net collections
of
approximately $2.5 million, non-cash stock option compensation expense of
approximately $1.9 million and depreciation and amortization expense of
approximately $443,000 partially offset by an increase in inventory of
approximately $1.5 million. We anticipate that short-term and long-term funding
needs will be provided from cash and available-for-sale marketable securities
and cash flow from government contracts. In the first six months of 2006,
investment activities provided approximately $2.3 million of cash, consisting
of
the proceeds from the sale and purchase of investments of $3.0 million,
partially offset by equipment purchases of approximately $660,000. During the
first six months of 2006, financing activities provided approximately $2.4
million of cash, primarily from the proceeds of option exercises.
-21-
We
believe that we have sufficient cash, or access to sufficient cash through
potential banking or investing relationships to meet current and future cash
needs. Contracts related to our core technologies are on a cost plus fixed
fee
basis. This means the majority of work performed is done at our
government-approved rates, which include general and administrative costs,
overhead, labor and materials, fees and profit. These costs are accrued as
incurred and billed monthly. These government-approved rates are adjusted
periodically and may be adjusted in the future to incorporate additional costs
as the operations expand. Other contracts are at fixed prices which have
commercial type gross margins associated with them.
BACK-LOG
OF ORDERS
At
June
30, 2006, we had a backlog (that is, work load remaining on signed contracts)
of
approximately $5,702,000 to be completed within the next twelve months. The
backlog does not include proposals and contracts under negotiation.
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
In
the
normal course of business, our financial position is subject to a variety of
risks, such as the collectibility of our accounts receivable and the
recoverability of the carrying values of our long-term assets. We do not
presently enter into any transactions involving derivative financial instruments
for risk management or other purposes.
Our
available cash balances are invested on a short-term basis and are not subject
to significant risks associated with changes in interest rates. Substantially
all of our cash flows are derived from our operations and transactions within
the United States and we are not subject to market risk associated with changes
in foreign exchange rates.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
EVALUATION
OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our
management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures as of June 30, 2006. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed
by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. During the
quarter ended June 30, 2006, there was no significant change in our internal
controls over financial reports that has materially affected, or which is
reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial
reporting.
-22-
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1 LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
In
July
2006, two purported class action complaints were filed by George Wood and
Raymond Veedon against Ionatron and its founders. Each of the class actions
were
filed in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona and
allege, among other things, violations of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, claiming that the Company issued false and
misleading statements concerning the development of its counter IED product..
As
of the date of this report we have not been served with either complaint. We
are
unable to evaluate the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or estimate the
range of potential loss, if any. However, the company intends to defend itself
vigorously in any legal proceedings.
In
addition, we may from time to time be involved in legal proceedings arising
from
the normal course of business. As of the date of this report, we have not
received notice of any other legal proceedings.
ITEM
1a RISK
FACTORS
The
contract for our 12-unit pre-production JIN products was concluded during the
second quarter of 2006. This contract accounted for approximately 68.4% and
70.2% of our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2005 and the three months
ended March 31, 2006, respectively. As the current pre-production order and
assessment ended during the second quarter of 2006, the path forward is
currently being identified and evaluated. Any new funding will come from
approved statements of work and will require additional satisfactory testing
by
the government.
We
rely
on government funding for certain aspects of LIPC development through funding
provided in the federal government budget and contracts with various government
agencies. Due to federal budgetary constraints and an anticipated overall
reduction in the defense budget, we cannot assure you that any continued
Government funding will be made available, or that we will be able to enter
into
any agreements with government customers for the further development of LIPC.
We
expect that additional funding for LIPC will be subject to our technology
meeting certain government established milestones. If our LIPC technology does
not meet government established milestones, additional government funding may
be
reduced or eliminated. If additional government funding for LIPC is reduced
or
is not forthcoming, in the absence of additional funding, our LIPC technology
development efforts and revenues will be adversely affected.
ITEM
2 UNREGISTERED
SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
During
the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company issued
260,105 shares of common stock upon exercise of outstanding options and warrants
to employees, directors and consultants in addition to shares of common stock
issued upon exercise of options granted under stock option plans and stock
incentive plans. The securities were issued pursuant to an exemption from
registration pursuant to Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of
1933.
ITEM
4
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
At
the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Ionatron, Inc. held on June 21, 2006,
62,590,414 shares of Ionatron’s Common Stock, or 85.4% of the total Common Stock
outstanding on the record date for such meeting, were represented.
The
stockholders of Ionatron elected Mr. Thomas C. Dearmin and Mr. George P. Farley
as Class II Directors with terms expiring at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
to be held in 2009. Of the shares voted with respect to the election of Mr.
Dearmin, 62,226,993 were voted in favor and 363,421 were withheld. Of the shares
voted with respect to the election of Mr. Farley, 62,067,543 were voted in
favor
and 522,871 were withheld.
Continuing
as a Class I Director with a term expiring in 2008 is Mr. James A. McDivitt.
Continuing as Class III Directors with terms expiring in 2007 are Mr. James
K.
Harlan, and Mr. David C. Hurley.
The
stockholders of Ionatron also approved an amendment to the Company’s Certificate
of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of preferred stock
from 1,000,000 to 2,000,000. Of the shares voted with respect to the approval
of
the amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation, 50,511,910 were voted in
favor, 609,725 were voted against and 244,315 abstained. In addition, there
were
11,224,464 shares that were not voted on this proposal.
-23-
ITEM
6 EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT
NUMBER
|
DESCRIPTION
|
|
3.1
|
Certificate
of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Ionatron, Inc. filed
June
21, 2006.
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive pursuant to Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32.1
|
Chief
Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
32.2
|
Chief
Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
-24-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
IONATRON, INC. | ||
|
|
|
By: | /s/ Thomas C. Dearmin | |
Thomas C. Dearmin |
||
Chief Executive Officer | ||
Date: August 7, 2006 |
-25-