APPLIED ENERGETICS, INC. - Quarter Report: 2008 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
x
Quarterly
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For
the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
OR
o Transition
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
For
the
transition period from __________ to __________
Commission
File Number 001-14015
APPLIED
ENERGETICS, INC.
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
|
77-0262908
|
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or
Organization) |
(IRS
Employer Identification Number)
|
3590
East Columbia Street
|
|
Tucson,
Arizona
|
85714
|
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code (520)
628-7415
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer: o
|
Accelerated
filer: x
|
Non-accelerated
filer: o
|
Smaller
reporting company: o
|
|
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting
company)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes o
No x
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common
equity, as of the latest practicable date. As of August 7, 2008, there were
80,622,710 shares of the issuer's common stock, par value $.001 per share,
outstanding.
APPLIED
ENERGETICS, INC.
June
30,
2008
PART
I -
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
|
Item
1 -
|
Consolidated
Financial Statements
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2008 (Unaudited) and December 31,
2007
|
1
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007
(Unaudited)
|
2
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007
(Unaudited)
|
3
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007
(Unaudited)
|
4
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
5
|
|
Item
2 -
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
11
|
Item
4 -
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
14
|
PART
II -
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
Item
2 -
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
15
|
Item
4 -
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
15
|
Item 5
-
|
Other Information | 15 |
Item
6 -
|
Exhibits
|
15
|
SIGNATURES
|
16
|
i
PART
I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
APPLIED
ENERGETICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, 2008
|
December 31, 2007
|
||||||
(Unaudited)
|
|
||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Current
assets
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
8,021,845
|
$
|
14,981,192
|
|||
Accounts
receivable
|
5,330,634
|
3,264,968
|
|||||
Inventory
|
1,991,403
|
1,468,391
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and deposits
|
231,142
|
445,832
|
|||||
Other
receivables
|
126,931
|
59,983
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
15,701,955
|
20,220,366
|
|||||
Securities
available for sale
|
7,125,000
|
7,500,000
|
|||||
Property
and equipment - net
|
3,528,310
|
1,600,887
|
|||||
Intangible
assets - net
|
61,500
|
86,100
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
50,153
|
59,517
|
|||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$
|
26,466,918
|
$
|
29,466,870
|
|||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
589,233
|
$
|
1,148,266
|
|||
Accrued
expenses
|
661,145
|
516,589
|
|||||
Accrued
compensation
|
706,814
|
1,060,603
|
|||||
Customer
deposits
|
824,850
|
936,373
|
|||||
Billings
in excess of costs
|
197,455
|
-
|
|||||
Current
portion of capital lease obligations
|
6,916
|
13,937
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
2,986,413
|
3,675,768
|
|||||
Capital
lease obligations
|
-
|
2,028
|
|||||
Deferred
rent
|
5,787
|
125,814
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
2,992,200
|
3,803,610
|
|||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|||||||
Stockholders’
equity
|
|||||||
Series
A Convertible Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 2,000,000 shares
authorized;
678,000 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2008 and
690,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
678
|
690
|
|||||
Common
stock, $.001 par value, 125,000,000 shares authorized; 80,622,710
shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2008 and 80,244,617
shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
80,623
|
80,245
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
68,941,062
|
66,344,066
|
|||||
Accumulated
deficit
|
(45,172,645
|
)
|
(40,761,741
|
)
|
|||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(375,000
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
23,474,718
|
25,663,260
|
|||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
$
|
26,466,918
|
$
|
29,466,870
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)
-
1
-
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
For the three months ended
June 30,
|
|||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
5,677,998
|
$
|
3,149,173
|
|||
Cost
of revenue
|
5,189,454
|
3,135,603
|
|||||
Gross
profit
|
488,544
|
13,570
|
|||||
Operating
expenses:
|
|||||||
General
and administrative
|
1,157,277
|
2,317,578
|
|||||
Selling
and marketing
|
72,854
|
125,015
|
|||||
Research
and development
|
243,272
|
183,804
|
|||||
Total
operating expenses
|
1,473,403
|
2,626,397
|
|||||
Operating
loss
|
(984,859
|
)
|
(2,612,827
|
)
|
|||
Other
(expense) income
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
(239
|
)
|
(489
|
)
|
|||
Interest
income
|
165,780
|
354,143
|
|||||
Other
|
-
|
7,835
|
|||||
Total
other
|
165,541
|
361,489
|
|||||
Net
loss
|
(819,318
|
)
|
(2,251,338
|
)
|
|||
Preferred
stock dividends
|
(282,220
|
)
|
(295,105
|
)
|
|||
Net
loss attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
(1,101,538
|
)
|
$
|
(2,546,443
|
)
|
|
Net
loss per common share – basic and diluted
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
Weighted
average number of shares outstanding, basic and diluted
|
80,594,626
|
78,741,988
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)
-
2
-
APPLIED
ENERGETICS, INC.
|
|||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
For the six months ended
June 30,
|
|||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
7,639,088
|
$
|
5,219,783
|
|||
Cost
of revenue
|
6,929,562
|
5,347,512
|
|||||
Gross
profit (loss)
|
709,526
|
(127,729
|
)
|
||||
Operating
expenses:
|
|||||||
General
and administrative
|
4,522,741
|
4,663,285
|
|||||
Selling
and marketing
|
111,438
|
254,815
|
|||||
Research
and development
|
605,210
|
307,827
|
|||||
Total
operating expenses
|
5,239,389
|
5,225,927
|
|||||
Operating
loss
|
(4,529,863
|
)
|
(5,353,656
|
)
|
|||
Other
(expense) income
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
(1,552
|
)
|
(1,488
|
)
|
|||
Interest
income
|
415,608
|
737,969
|
|||||
Other
|
10
|
7,847
|
|||||
Total
other
|
414,066
|
744,328
|
|||||
Net
loss
|
(4,115,797
|
)
|
(4,609,328
|
)
|
|||
Preferred
stock dividends
|
(577,311
|
)
|
(590,221
|
)
|
|||
Net
loss attributable to common stockholders
|
$
|
(4,693,108
|
)
|
$
|
(5,199,549
|
)
|
|
Net
loss per common share – basic and diluted
|
$
|
(0.06
|
)
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
Weighted
average number of shares outstanding, basic and diluted
|
80,499,620
|
78,458,508
|
|||||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)
|
-
3
-
APPLIED
ENERGETICS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the six months ended
June 30,
|
|||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(4,115,797
|
)
|
$
|
(4,609,328
|
)
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
480,206
|
541,706
|
|||||
Loss
on equipment disposal
|
-
|
4,504
|
|||||
Deferred
rent adjustment on purchase of premises
|
118,594
|
-
|
|||||
Provision
for losses on projects
|
-
|
286,247
|
|||||
Non-cash
stock based compensation expense
|
2,302,255
|
1,785,297
|
|||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
(2,065,666
|
)
|
(493,896
|
)
|
|||
Other
receivable
|
(66,948
|
)
|
(1,647
|
)
|
|||
Inventory
|
(523,012
|
)
|
(1,490,016
|
)
|
|||
Prepaid
expenses and deposits
|
224,054
|
385,521
|
|||||
Accounts
payable
|
(559,033
|
)
|
236,408
|
||||
Billings
in excess of costs
|
197,455
|
-
|
|||||
Accrued
expenses, deposits and deferred rent
|
(440,783
|
)
|
(495,574
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
(4,448,675
|
)
|
(3,850,778
|
)
|
|||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Purchase
of land, building and equipment
|
(2,501,623
|
)
|
(136,849
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from disposal of equipment
|
-
|
17,180
|
|||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(2,501,623
|
)
|
(119,669
|
)
|
|||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|||||||
Principal
payments on capital lease obligations
|
(9,049
|
)
|
(49,755
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(9,049
|
)
|
(49,755
|
)
|
|||
Net
decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
(6,959,347
|
)
|
(4,020,202
|
)
|
|||
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
14,981,192
|
22,123,792
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$
|
8,021,845
|
$
|
18,103,590
|
|||
See
supplemental cash flow information at note 12
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)
-
4
-
APPLIED
ENERGETICS, INC.
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June
30,
2008
(unaudited)
1.
BASIS
OF PRESENTATION
The
accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of Applied Energetics, Inc. and its wholly owned
subsidiaries, Ionatron Technologies, Inc. and North Star Power Engineering,
Inc.
as of June 30, 2008 (collectively, "company," "Applied Energetics," "we," "our"
or "us"). All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
In
the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include normal recurring
adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim
periods presented have been made. The results for the three-month period ended
June 30, 2008, may not be indicative of the results for the entire year. Certain
reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform to the
current period presentation. The interim unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the company's audited
consolidated financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
USE
OF ESTIMATES
The
preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with United
States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), requires management to
make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the amounts reported
in
the financial statements and accompanying notes. Management bases its
assumptions on historical experiences and on various other assumptions that
it
believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form
the
basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities
that are not readily apparent from other sources. In addition, Management
considers the basis and methodology used in developing and selecting these
estimates, the trends in and amounts of these estimates, specific matters
affecting the amount of and changes in these estimates, and any other relevant
matters related to these estimates, including significant issues concerning
accounting principles and financial statement presentation. Such estimates
and
assumptions could change in the future, as more information becomes known which
could impact the amounts reported and disclosed herein. Significant estimates
include revenue recognition under the percentage of completion method of
contract accounting, estimate to forecast loss on a contract under completed
contract method of accounting, the valuation of inventory, estimate to forecast
expected forfeiture rate on stock-based compensation and stock-based
compensation expense.
RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
The
FASB
has issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (‘SFAS”) No. 162, “The
Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”. SFAS No. 162 is intended
to improve financial reporting by identifying a consistent framework, or
hierarchy, for selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial
statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP for nongovernmental
entities. This Statement is effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411,
“The
Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles.” The adoption of the standard is not expected to have a significant
impact on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.
2. ACCOUNTS
RECEIVABLE
Accounts
receivable consists of the following as of June 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007:
June 30, 2008
|
December 31, 2007
|
||||||
Contracts
receivable
|
$
|
3,727,198
|
$
|
1,734,140
|
|||
Costs
and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts
|
1,603,436
|
1,530,828
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
5,330,634
|
$
|
3,264,968
|
Contract
receivables at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are expected to be collected
within a year. Of the $5.3 million of accounts receivable at June 30, 2008,
$3.2
million was collected in July 2008.
-
5
-
APPLIED
ENERGETICS, INC.
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June
30,
2008
(unaudited)
Costs
and
Estimated Earnings on Uncompleted Contracts
June 30, 2008
|
December 31, 2007
|
||||||
Costs
incurred on uncompleted contracts
|
$
|
17,409,179
|
$
|
10,881,465
|
|||
Estimated
earnings
|
1,335,928
|
829,764
|
|||||
Total
billable costs and estimated earnings
|
18,745,107
|
11,711,229
|
|||||
Less:
|
|||||||
Billings
to date
|
17,339,126
|
10,180,401
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
1,405,981
|
$
|
1,530,828
|
|||
Included
in accompanying balance sheet:
|
|||||||
Unbilled
costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts included
in accounts
receivable
|
|||||||
$
|
1,603,436
|
$
|
1,530,828
|
||||
Billings
in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted
contracts
|
(197,455
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Total
|
$
|
1,405,981
|
$
|
1,530,828
|
|||
3. INVENTORY
Our
inventories consist of the following as of June 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007:
June 30, 2008
|
December 31, 2007
|
||||||
Raw
materials
|
$
|
369,270
|
$
|
213,645
|
|||
Work-in-process
|
1,622,133
|
1,254,746
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
1,991,403
|
$
|
1,468,391
|
The
increase in inventory is primarily attributable to costs associated with
non-governmental contracts not yet complete.
4. SECURITIES
AVAILABLE FOR SALE
Effective
the first quarter of 2008, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”), for assets
and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. SFAS 157
accomplishes the following key objectives:
· |
Defines
fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or
paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date;
|
· |
Establishes
a three-level hierarchy (“Valuation Hierarchy”) for fair value
measurements;
|
· |
Requires
consideration of the Company’s creditworthiness when valuing liabilities;
and
|
· |
Expands
disclosures about instruments measured at fair
value.
|
The
Valuation Hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation
of
an asset or liability as of the measurement date. A financial instrument’s
categorization within the Valuation Hierarchy is based upon the lowest level
of
input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels of
the
Valuation Hierarchy are:
· |
Level
1 – inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices
(unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active
markets.
|
-
6
-
APPLIED
ENERGETICS, INC.
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June
30,
2008
(unaudited)
· |
Level
2 – inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for
similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that
are
observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly,
for
substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
|
· |
Level
3 – inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and
significant to the fair value measurement. See below for further
discussion of the Company’s level 3 fair value
measurements.
|
We
hold
investments in auction rate securities (“ARS”) in the form of asset backed
securities. Interest on these securities are designed to reset every 28 to
35
days. The stated maturity of the securities is generally greater than 10 years
and the securities are collateralized by student loans which are substantially
backed by the U.S. government. Starting in the first quarter of 2008, we
experienced difficulty in selling our ARS due to multiple failures of the
auction mechanism that provides liquidity to these type investments. The
securities for which auctions have failed will continue to accrue interest
and
be auctioned at each respective reset date until the auction succeeds, the
issuer redeems the securities or they mature. The estimated fair value of the
ARS no longer approximates par value due to the lack of liquidity. We engaged
a
3rd
party
expert valuation firm to provide guidance and following receipt of their
assessments assigned a 5% discount to the par value of our ARS portfolio. This
discount was recorded as a temporary impairment within other comprehensive
loss
during the first quarter of 2008 after considering various factors, including
the strong credit quality of the ARS, rate of interest received since failed
auctions began, yields of securities similar to the underlying ARS, input from
an independent 3rd
party
valuation firm, input from broker-dealers, and general ARS market conditions.
The securities have been classified within level 3 as their valuation requires
substantial judgment and estimation of factors that are not currently observable
in the market due to the lack of trading in the securities. We perform an
evaluation of these securities on a quarterly basis. The valuation may be
revised in future periods as market conditions evolve.
The
table
below includes a roll forward of our investments in ARS from December 31, 2007
to June 30, 2008:
Asset Backed
Securities |
||||
Fair
value December 31, 2007
|
$
|
7,500,000
|
||
Unrealized
losses - 1st quarter 2008
|
(375,000
|
)
|
||
Fair
value June 30, 2008
|
$
|
7,125,000
|
Unrealized
losses on securities available for sale are recorded in other comprehensive
loss, a component of stockholders’ equity. Subsequent to June 30, 2008, we sold
$100,000 of these securities at par.
In
February 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Staff
Position 157-2 (“FSP 157-2”). FSP 157-2 permits delayed adoption of SFAS 157 for
certain non-financial assets and liabilities, which are not recognized at fair
value on a recurring basis, until fiscal years and interim periods beginning
after November 15, 2008. We are in the process of evaluating the impact, if
any,
that the application of SFAS 157 to our non-financial assets will have on our
financial statements.
5. PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT
Our
property and equipment consist of the following as of June 30, 2008 and December
31, 2007:
-
7
-
APPLIED
ENERGETICS, INC.
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June
30,
2008
(unaudited)
June 30, 2008
|
December 31, 2007
|
||||||
Land
and buildings
|
$
|
2,072,215
|
$
|
-
|
|||
Equipment
|
2,971,079
|
2,717,940
|
|||||
Furniture
and building improvements
|
1,061,698
|
1,036,178
|
|||||
Software
|
784,361
|
753,947
|
|||||
Total
|
6,889,353
|
4,508,065
|
|||||
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(3,361,043
|
)
|
(2,907,178
|
)
|
|||
Net
property and equipment
|
$
|
3,528,310
|
$
|
1,600,887
|
On
February 6, 2008, we purchased our principal office, manufacturing, storage,
and
primary research and development facility from Columbia Tucson, LLC (“CT”),
which we previously leased from CT, which is reflected in the June 30, 2008
balance in land and buildings and the increase in accumulated depreciation
and
amortization. The purchase price of the property was approximately $2.2 million.
Joseph Hayden and Stephen McCahon, executive officers, Robert Howard and Thomas
Dearmin, principal stockholders and former executive officers and directors,
another former executive officer and certain family members of Mr. Howard owned
all of the membership interests of CT.
6. STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
Stock-Based
Compensation – Employees and Directors
For
the
three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, stock-based compensation expense
totaled $953,000 and $682,000, respectively. For the six months ended June
30,
2008 and 2007, stock-based compensation expense totaled $2.3 million and $1.8
million, respectively. There was no related income tax benefit recognized
because our deferred tax assets are fully offset by a valuation allowance.
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we granted 157,434 shares of
restricted stock to our employees, directors and non-employee consultants,
of
which 143,434 vested immediately and the remaining 14,000 vests up to 3 years.
The weighted average fair value of the restricted stock grants of $2.80 per
share are being expensed over the requisite service period. Additionally, during
the six months ended June 30, 2008, we granted options to purchase an aggregate
of 75,000 shares of our common stock to our directors. These director options
have a weighted average exercise price of $2.65 and vested immediately. During
the six months ended June 30, 2007, we granted options to purchase 456,500
shares of our common stock to certain employees with option exercise prices
equal to the market value of our common stock on the date of grant.
The
weighted average grant-date fair value of option grants was $1.36 and $1.77,
per
share, for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The fair
value of options granted are estimated using a Black-Scholes option pricing
model that uses the following assumptions:
Six
Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Expected
life (years)
|
4
years
|
4
years
|
|||||
Dividend
yield
|
0.0
|
%
|
0.0
|
%
|
|||
Expected
volatility
|
65.0
|
%
|
46.0
|
%
|
|||
Risk
free interest rates
|
2.4
|
%
|
4.7
|
%
|
|||
Weighted
average fair value of options at grant date
|
$
|
2.20
|
$
|
2.23
|
During
the six months ended June 30, 2008, 366,517 shares of restricted stock vested
and 9,900 shares of restricted stock were forfeited, and no options were
exercised and 274,500 options were forfeited. As of June 30, 2008, $2.6 million
and $1.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted
stock and stock options is expected to be recognized over a weighted average
period of approximately 1.3 years and 1.0 years, respectively.
-
8
-
APPLIED
ENERGETICS, INC.
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June
30,
2008
(unaudited)
Warrants
– Non-Employees
At
June
30, 2008 and 2007 there were outstanding warrants to purchase approximately
1.1
million and 1.6 million shares of common stock, respectively, which were either
(i) issued in connection with the August 2007 financing, (ii) issued to outside
consultants, or (iii) outstanding prior to our reverse merger in March 2004.
7. COMPREHENSIVE
LOSS
Total
comprehensive loss consisted of the following:
Three Months Ended June 30,
|
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Comprehensive
Loss
|
|||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(819,318
|
)
|
$
|
(2,251,338
|
)
|
$
|
(4,115,797
|
)
|
$
|
(4,609,328
|
)
|
|
Other
comprehensive loss:
|
|||||||||||||
Unrealized
loss on available-for-sale securities
|
-
|
-
|
(375,000
|
)
|
-
|
||||||||
Total
|
$
|
(819,318
|
)
|
$
|
(2,251,338
|
)
|
$
|
(4,490,797
|
)
|
$
|
(4,609,328
|
)
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive losses consisted of the following:
June 30, 2008
|
December 31, 2007
|
||||||
Cumulative
unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities
|
$
|
(375,000
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
||
Total
accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
$
|
(375,000
|
)
|
$
|
-
|
8. SIGNIFICANT
CUSTOMERS
Approximately
96% of revenues for both the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, and
94%
and 96% of revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, are generated from either the U.S. Government or contractors
to
the U.S. Government. The balance of our revenues are with significant customers
within the aerospace, high-voltage and technology industries.
9. NET
LOSS PER SHARE
Basic
loss per share is computed as net loss attributable to common stockholders
divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the
period. Diluted loss per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur
from common shares issuable through exercise of stock options and warrants,
vesting of restricted stock and conversion of preferred stock. The calculation
of diluted shares does not include options, warrants, restricted stock units
and
our 6.5% Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, due to the antidilutive effect
of
1,181,740 and 386,222 shares for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, and 1,177,766 and 383,890 shares for the six months ended June
30,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
-
9
-
APPLIED
ENERGETICS, INC.
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June
30,
2008
(unaudited)
10.DIVIDENDS
As
of
July 15, 2008, we had 678,000 shares outstanding of our 6.5% Series A
Convertible Preferred Stock. A dividend was declared and paid on August 1,
2008
to the holders of record as of July 15, 2008. The Board has a standing
resolution to pay this dividend in common stock. However, in July 2008, the
board resolved to pay the August 1, 2008 dividend in cash.
Dividends
on Preferred Stock are accrued when the amount and kind of the dividend is
determined and are payable quarterly on the first day of February, May, August
and November, in cash or shares of common stock, at the discretion of the
company.
11.
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
LITIGATION
In
July
2006, two class action complaints were filed by George Wood and Raymond Deedon
against Applied Energetics, Inc. (formerly Ionatron, Inc.) and its founders.
Each of the class actions was filed in the United States District Court for
the
District of Arizona and allege, among other things, violations of Section 10(b)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5, claiming that we issued
false and misleading statements concerning the development of its counter-IED
product. The court consolidated these cases, and a consolidated amended
complaint was served. The action has been dismissed against Joseph C. Hayden
and
Stephen W. McCahon with prejudice, and is proceeding against us and the
remaining defendants. We are unable to evaluate the likelihood of an unfavorable
outcome in this matter or estimate the range of potential loss, if any. However,
we intend to defend ourselves vigorously in these legal
proceedings.
In
September 2006, a derivative action was filed by John T. Johnasen in Arizona
State Court, Pima County, against certain of our current and former officers
and
directors, alleging, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty. On April
30,
2008, the state court continued a stay of the derivative action until 30 days
notice from any party or until further court order terminating the stay.
In
addition, we may from time to time be involved in legal proceedings arising
from
the normal course of business. As of the date of this report, we have not
received notice of any other legal proceedings.
12.
SUPPLEMENTAL
CASH FLOW INFORMATION
During
the quarter ended June 30, 2008, at the request of a preferred stock holder
pursuant to the preferred offering memorandum, we converted 12,000 shares of
preferred stock into 25,001 shares of common stock
Six Months Ended June 30,
|
|||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
|||||||
Interest
|
$
|
1,552
|
$
|
5,243
|
|||
Income
taxes
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
-
10
-
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
Our
discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations
should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial
statements and the related disclosures included elsewhere herein and in
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations included as part of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended
December 31, 2007.
CAUTIONARY
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain
statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute forward-looking
statements within the meaning of the securities laws. Forward-looking statements
include all statements that do not relate solely to the historical or current
facts, and can be identified by the use of forward looking words such as "may",
"believe", "will", "expect", "expected", "project", "anticipate", "anticipated”,
“estimates", "plans", "strategy", "target", "prospects" or "continue". These
forward looking statements are based on the current plans and expectations
of
our management and are subject to a number of uncertainties and risks that
could
significantly affect our current plans and expectations, as well as future
results of operations and financial condition and may cause our actual results,
performances or achievements to be materially different from any future results,
performances or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements. Important factors that could cause our actual results to differ
materially from our expectations are described Item 1A. (Risk Factors) of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. In making
these
forward-looking statements, we claim the protection of the safe-harbor for
forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Reform Act of
1995. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such
forward-looking statements are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such
expectations will prove to have been correct. We do not assume any obligation
to
update these forward-looking statements to reflect actual results, changes
in
assumptions, or changes in other factors affecting such forward-looking
statements.
OVERVIEW
Applied
Energetics is a developer and manufacturer of applied energy systems, primarily
for military applications, utilizing our proprietary knowledge of high
performance lasers, high-voltage electronics, advanced adaptive optics and
atmospheric and plasma energy interactions. We apply these technologies to
deliver innovative solutions to urgent military missions, including neutralizing
improvised explosive devices (“IEDs”), neutralizing vehicle-borne IEDs (i.e. car
bombs), and non-lethal methods for vehicle stopping, among other high priority
missions of U.S. and allied military forces. Additionally, we develop and
manufacture high-voltage and laser products for government and commercial
customers for a range of applications. In February 2008, we changed our name
to
Applied Energetics, Inc.
In
April
2008, we received a $4.5 million sole source contract from the Advanced
Munitions Technology Development office at the U.S. Army’s Research, Development
and Engineering Command (ARDEC – Picatinny NJ) for the development and
advancement of the Company’s Laser Guided Energy technology. This funding is
directly from ARDEC’s discretionary funds.
In
June
2008, we received a $9.3 million cost-plus fixed fee contract for a system
for
the U.S. Marine Corps. Due to the sensitivity of the effort, the customer has
asked that program details not be publicly disclosed. The twelve-month contract
will be administered by the U.S. Army (Aberdeen Proving Ground,
MD).
-
11
-
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
COMPARISON
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2008 AND 2007 IS AS
FOLLOWS:
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
5,677,998
|
$
|
3,149,173
|
|||
5,189,454
|
3,135,603
|
||||||
General
and administrative
|
1,157,277
|
2,317,578
|
|||||
Selling
and marketing
|
72,854
|
125,015
|
|||||
Research
and development
|
243,272
|
183,804
|
|||||
Other
(expense) income:
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
(239
|
)
|
(489
|
)
|
|||
Interest
income
|
165,780
|
354,143
|
|||||
Other
|
-
|
7,835
|
|||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(819,318
|
)
|
$
|
(2,251,338
|
)
|
REVENUE
Revenue
increased approximately $2.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008
compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007, which is attributable to
an
increase in revenue from Counter-IED
projects
of approximately $3.9 million from the new U.S. Marine Corps contract received
in June 2008, offset by a reduction in revenue on our LGE projects of
approximately $1.5 million.
COST
OF REVENUE
Cost
of
revenue increased approximately $2.1 million compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2007 primarily due to the increase in costs related to our Counter-IED
projects in line with our increased Counter-IED project revenues. Cost of
revenue includes manufacturing labor, fringe and overhead, and an allocation
of
allowable general and administration and research and development costs in
accordance with the terms of our government contracts.
GENERAL
AND ADMINISTRATIVE
General
and administrative (“G&A”) expenses decreased approximately $1.2 million in
the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June
30,
2007 largely due to allocable and allowable costs contained in cost of revenue.
The decrease primarily consists of a $998,000 increase in applied labor,
overhead and material handling costs allocated to cost of revenue, a decrease
of
$289,000 in professional fees and a decrease of $145,000 in reduced rent
directly related to the purchase of our principal Tucson facility in February
2008 and the exit from our leased facility at the Stennis Space Center,
Mississippi in September 2007. These decreases were partially offset by an
increase of $298,000 of non-cash stock-based expense to $953,000 for the
quarter.
SELLING
AND MARKETING
Selling
and marketing expenses decreased approximately $52,000 for the quarter ended
June 30, 2008 from the same period in 2007, reflecting reduced payroll costs,
travel expenses and professional fees.
RESEARCH
AND DEVELOPMENT
Non-contract
research and development (“R&D”) expenses increased approximately $59,000
during the three months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the same period
in
2007 primarily due to increased focus and commitments to explore new
technologies in counter-IED, LGE, laser and high-voltage areas.
INTEREST
INCOME AND INTEREST EXPENSE
Net
interest income for the second quarter of 2008 was lower by approximately
$188,000 from the same period of 2007 primarily due to the lower balance of
invested funds and lower interest rates on our investments in 2008.
NET
LOSS
As
a
result of the foregoing, our operations for the three months ended June 30,
2008
resulted in a net loss of approximately $819,000, a reduction of approximately
$1.4 million compared to the $2.3 million loss for the same period of 2007.
-
12
-
COMPARISON
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2008 AND 2007 IS AS
FOLLOWS:
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Revenue
|
$
|
7,639,088
|
$
|
5,219,783
|
|||
Cost
of revenue
|
6,929,562
|
5,347,512
|
|||||
General
and administrative
|
4,522,741
|
4,663,285
|
|||||
Selling
and marketing
|
111,438
|
254,815
|
|||||
Research
and development
|
605,210
|
307,827
|
|||||
Other
(expense) income:
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
(1,552
|
)
|
(1,488
|
)
|
|||
Interest
income
|
415,608
|
737,969
|
|||||
Other
|
10
|
7,847
|
|||||
Net
loss
|
$
|
(4,115,797
|
)
|
$
|
(4,609,328
|
)
|
REVENUE
Revenue
increased approximately $2.4 million to $7.6 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 compared to 2007, which is primarily attributable to increased
revenues from our new U.S. Marine Corps contract received in June 2008 of
approximately $3.5 million and our non-governmental projects of $261,000, offset
by a reduction in LGE revenue of approximately $1.3 million.
COST
OF REVENUE
Cost
of
revenue increased approximately $1.6 million to $6.9 million compared to the
six
months ended June 30, 2007 primarily due to increased costs associated with
our
Counter-IED projects in line with increased revenues. In addition, in 2008,
costs decreased in our LGE projects in line with decreased revenues while costs
on non-governmental projects decreased reflecting the loss provisions in 2007.
Cost of revenue includes manufacturing labor, fringe and overhead, and an
allocation of allowable general and administrative and research and development
costs in accordance with the terms of our government contracts.
GENERAL
AND ADMINISTRATIVE
G&A
expenses decreased approximately $141,000 in the first two quarters of 2008
compared to 2007. The decrease primarily consists of a $596,000 increase in
applied labor, overhead and material handling costs allocated to cost of revenue
and decreases of $282,000 of professional fees, $273,000 in rent expense
directly related to the purchase of our principal Tucson facility in February
2008 and the exit from our leased facilities at the Stennis Space Center,
Mississippi in September 2007. The decrease was partially offset by an increase
of $565,000 in non-cash stock-based expenses to $2.3 million for the period,
and
increases of $248,000 of benefits and $217,000 of salaries and accrued
compensation
SELLING
AND MARKETING
Selling
and marketing expenses decreased approximately $143,000 for the two quarters
ended June 30, 2008 from the same period in 2007, reflecting reduced payroll
costs and professional fees.
RESEARCH
AND DEVELOPMENT
Non-contract
R&D expenses increased approximately $297,000 during the six months ended
June 30, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007 primarily due the $203,000
increase in R&D materials and the $144,000 increase in payroll costs charged
to R&D projects due to our increased focus and commitment to explore new
technologies in counter-IED, LGE, laser and high-voltage areas.
INTEREST
INCOME AND INTEREST EXPENSE
Net
interest income for the first two quarters of 2008 was lower by approximately
$322,000 from the same period of 2007 primarily due to the lower balance of
invested funds and lower interest rates on our investments in 2008.
-
13
-
NET
LOSS
As
a
result of the forgoing, our operations for the six months ended June 30, 2008
resulted in a net loss of approximately $4.1 million, a reduction of
approximately $494,000 compared to the $4.6 million loss for the same period
of
2007. This decrease in loss incorporates an increase in revenues of $2.4 million
with offsetting costs of revenue of $1.6 million, decreases in sales and
marketing and G&A of $143,000 and $141,000, respectively, with a decrease in
net interest income of $322,000, and an increase in R&D of
$297,000.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At
June
30, 2008, we had approximately $8.0 million of cash and cash equivalents and
$7.1 million securities available-for-sale (net of a temporary impairment of
$375,000). Our cash position decreased during the first six months of 2008
by
approximately $7.0 million. During the first six months of 2008, we used $4.4
million of cash in operating activities. This amount is comprised primarily
of
our net loss of $4.1 million, an increase in accounts receivable of $2.1
million, a decrease in accounts payable of $559,000, an increase in inventory
of
$523,000 associated with our counter-IED efforts and a decrease in accrued
expenses, deposits and deferred rent of $441,000. Offsetting these amounts
are
non-cash stock-based compensation expense of $2.3 million, depreciation and
amortization of $480,000, a decrease in prepaid expenses and deposits of
$224,000, and an increase in billings in excess of costs of $197,000. As part
of
our total cash use during the first six months of 2008, investment activities
used approximately $2.5 million, primarily from the acquisition of our principal
Tucson manufacturing and engineering facility and financing activities used
approximately $9,000.
Certain
of our marketable securities are facing a temporary illiquidity as the
underlying auction markets have failed. It is not known when the underlying
auction markets will regain liquidity, if at all. However, subsequent to June
30, 2008 we sold $100,000 of these securities at par. Additionally, in July
2008, we received payment of $3.2 million on government contracts accounts
receivable further improving our current cash position.
We
anticipate that short-term and long-term funding needs will be provided by
the
cash flow generated from current and future contracts. We believe that we have
sufficient working capital to fulfill existing contracts and expected contracts
in 2008 and into 2009. The transportable demonstrator contract and the other
contracts that presently represent a major portion of our current activity,
are
on a cost plus fixed fee basis. This means all work performed is done at our
government-approved rates, which include general and administrative costs,
overhead, labor and materials, fees and profit. These costs are accrued as
incurred and billed monthly.
BACKLOG
OF ORDERS
At
June
30, 2008, we had a backlog (workload remaining on signed contracts) of
approximately $13.1 million to be completed within the next twelve months.
This
increase is primarily due to the award of the $4.5 million and $9.3 million
in
new contracts received during the quarter. The backlog does not include
proposals and contracts under negotiation at June 30, 2008.
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
EVALUATION
OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our
management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures as of June 30, 2008. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed
by us in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. During the
six
months ended June 30, 2008, there was no significant change in our internal
controls over financial reporting that has materially affected, or which is
reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial
reporting.
-
14
-
PART
II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
2 UNREGISTERED
SALE OF SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
On
June
20, 2008, we issued 25,001 shares of common stock upon conversion of 12,000
shares of Series A Preferred Stock. These shares were issued pursuant to an
exemption from registration contained in Rule 3(a)(9) under the Securities
Act
of 1933.
ITEM
4. SUBMISSION
OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
At
the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Applied Energetics, Inc. held on June 11,
2008, 69,212,157 shares of Applied Energetics’ Common Stock, or approximately
86% of the total Common Stock outstanding on the record date for such meeting,
were represented.
The
Stockholders of Applied Energetics elected Messrs. Dana A. Marshall and James
A.
McDivitt as Class I Directors to hold office until the 2011 Annual Meeting
of
Stockholders and General James M. Feigley as a Class II Director to hold office
until the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and until their respective
successors have been duly elected and qualified. Of the shares voted with
respect to the election of Mr. Marshall, 62,885,730 were voted in favor and
6,326,427 were withheld. Of the shares voted with respect to the election of
Mr.
McDivitt, 68,671,135 were voted in favor and 541,022 were withheld. Of the
shares voted with respect to the election of General Feigley, 68,684,164 were
voted in favor and 527,993 were withheld.
Continuing
as a Class II Director with a term expiring in 2009 is Mr. George P. Farley.
Continuing as Class III Directors with terms expiring in 2010 are Mr. James
K.
Harlan and Mr. David C. Hurley.
ITEM
5. OTHER
INFORMATION
On
August 11, 2008, we issued a press release, which
contained non-GAAP information.
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT
NUMBER
|
DESCRIPTION
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Chief Executive pursuant to Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 or 15d-14 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302
of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1
|
Chief
Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
32.2
|
Chief
Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
99.1
|
Press
release issued by Applied Energetics, Inc. on August 11,
2008.
|
-
15
-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
APPLIED
ENERGETICS, INC.
|
|
By
|
/s/
Dana A. Marshall
|
Dana
A. Marshall
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer and President
|
Date:
August 11, 2008
-
16
-