ARC DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS, INC. - Quarter Report: 2005 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
________________
________________
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For The Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2005
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission
File Number: 001-32407
AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
Delaware | 20-1700361 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
700 North Central Avenue, Suite 550
Glendale, California 91203
(818) 500-0225
Glendale, California 91203
(818) 500-0225
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of
Registrants principal executive offices)
Registrants principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange
Act Rule 12b-2). Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No o
As of September 30, 2005, there were 44,314,812 shares of the Registrants common stock
outstanding.
AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2005
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2005
Table of Contents
2
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, | September 30, | |||||||
2004 | 2005 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 13,826 | $ | 12,828 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net |
61,679 | 72,761 | ||||||
Inventories, net |
6,012 | 7,017 | ||||||
Deferred taxes |
1,364 | 2,897 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
7,855 | 5,085 | ||||||
Total current assets |
90,736 | 100,588 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
35,023 | 37,375 | ||||||
Goodwill |
231,357 | 241,703 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, net |
12,095 | 19,474 | ||||||
Deferred financing costs, net |
6,619 | 4,596 | ||||||
Deferred taxes |
| 17,815 | ||||||
Other assets |
1,504 | 1,461 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 377,334 | $ | 423,012 | ||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 21,170 | $ | 22,266 | ||||
Accrued payroll and payroll-related expenses |
11,683 | 11,544 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
24,834 | 23,233 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases |
10,276 | 12,426 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
67,963 | 69,469 | ||||||
Long-term debt and capital leases, net of debt discount |
310,557 | 245,875 | ||||||
Mandatorily redeemable preferred membership units |
27,814 | | ||||||
Deferred taxes |
5,634 | | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
375 | 376 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
412,343 | 315,720 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6) |
||||||||
Stockholders equity (deficit): |
||||||||
Members deficit |
(32,688 | ) | | |||||
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 25,000,000 shares
authorized; zero and zero shares issued and outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $.001 par value, 150,000,000 shares
authorized; zero and 44,314,812 shares issued and
outstanding |
| 44 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
| 53,722 | ||||||
Deferred stock-based compensation |
(2,527 | ) | (2,078 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings |
| 55,550 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
206 | 54 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity (deficit) |
(35,009 | ) | 107,292 | |||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity (deficit) |
$ | 377,334 | $ | 423,012 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Reprographics services |
$ | 82,476 | 94,730 | $ | 253,367 | $ | 277,133 | |||||||||
Facilities management |
18,480 | 21,577 | 53,736 | 61,825 | ||||||||||||
Equipment and supplies sales |
9,209 | 11,180 | 29,195 | 30,555 | ||||||||||||
Total net sales |
110,165 | 127,487 | 336,298 | 369,513 | ||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
65,878 | 74,965 | 196,668 | 215,012 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
44,287 | 52,522 | 139,630 | 154,501 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
26,170 | 28,315 | 81,434 | 83,336 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
415 | 603 | 1,267 | 1,418 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations |
17,702 | 23,604 | 56,929 | 69,747 | ||||||||||||
Other income |
(7 | ) | (63 | ) | (574 | ) | (287 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense, net |
8,559 | 6,131 | 25,089 | 20,649 | ||||||||||||
Income before income tax provision (benefit) |
9,150 | 17,536 | 32,414 | 49,385 | ||||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
1,959 | 7,018 | 6,940 | (8,079 | ) | |||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 7,191 | $ | 10,518 | $ | 25,474 | $ | 57,464 | ||||||||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.20 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.72 | $ | 1.37 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.19 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.68 | $ | 1.33 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
35,487,511 | 44,170,226 | 35,487,511 | 42,080,404 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
37,473,657 | 45,014,364 | 37,473,657 | 43,058,179 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Additional | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Members | Par | Paid-In | Deferred | Retained | Comprehensive | Stockholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deficit | Shares | Value | Capital | Compensation | Earnings | Income | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2004 |
$ | (32,688 | ) | | $ | | $ | | $ | (2,527 | ) | $ | | $ | 206 | $ | (35,009 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred stock-based
compensation for the period from
January 1 to February 9, 2005 |
| | | | 61 | | | 61 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income for the period
from January 1 to
February 9, 2005: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
1,914 | | | | | | | 1,914 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value adjustment of derivatives |
| | | | | | 195 | 195 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
2,109 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to members |
(8,244 | ) | | | | | | | (8,244 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Reorganization from LLC to C
Corporation |
39,018 | 35,510,011 | 35 | (39,053 | ) | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock in initial
public offering, net of underwriting
discounts |
| 7,666,667 | 8 | 92,682 | | | | 92,690 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock in exchange
for warrants exercised upon initial
public offering |
| 754,476 | 1 | | | | | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct costs of initial public offering |
| | | (3,899 | ) | | | | (3,899 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred stock-based
compensation for the period from
February 10 to September 30, 2005 |
| | | | 388 | | | 388 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock under
Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
| 177,058 | | 1,956 | | | | 1,956 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised |
| 206,600 | | 1,036 | | | | 1,036 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from exercise of stock
options |
| | | 1,000 | | | | 1,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income for the period
from February 10 to
September 30, 2005: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | | 55,550 | | 55,550 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value adjustment of
derivatives, net of tax effects |
| | | | | | (347 | ) | (347 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
55,203 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2005 |
$ | | 44,314,812 | $ | 44 | $ | 53,722 | $ | (2,078 | ) | $ | 55,550 | $ | 54 | $ | 107,292 | ||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2004 | 2005 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 25,474 | $ | 57,464 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities: |
||||||||
Accretion of yield on redeemable preferred member units |
1,494 | 449 | ||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
1,110 | 1,052 | ||||||
Reserve for inventory obsolescence |
68 | 76 | ||||||
Depreciation |
12,739 | 12,489 | ||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
1,267 | 1,418 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
1,855 | 1,212 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
689 | (24,982 | ) | |||||
Write-off of deferred financing costs |
| 1,683 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred stock-based compensation |
332 | 449 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of
business acquisitions: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
(10,287 | ) | (7,150 | ) | ||||
Inventory |
29 | 211 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
(572 | ) | 1,676 | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
8,221 | (3,460 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
42,419 | 42,587 | ||||||
Investing activities |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(4,772 | ) | (3,376 | ) | ||||
Payments for businesses acquired, net of cash acquired and
including other cash payments associated with acquisitions |
(2,893 | ) | (16,299 | ) | ||||
Other |
54 | (35 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(7,611 | ) | (19,710 | ) | ||||
Financing activities |
||||||||
Proceeds from initial public offering, net of underwriting discounts |
| 92,690 | ||||||
Direct costs of initial public offering |
| (1,487 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
| 1,036 | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under Employee Stock
Purchase Plan |
| 1,956 | ||||||
Redemption of preferred member units |
| (28,263 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from borrowings under debt agreements |
1,000 | 13,000 | ||||||
Payments on long-term debt under debt agreements |
(36,191 | ) | (94,204 | ) | ||||
Payment of loan fees |
(355 | ) | (359 | ) | ||||
Member distributions |
(4,569 | ) | (8,244 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(40,115 | ) | (23,875 | ) | ||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(5,307 | ) | (998 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
17,315 | 13,826 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 12,008 | $ | 12,828 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Noncash investing and financing activities |
||||||||
Noncash transactions include the following: |
||||||||
Capital lease obligations incurred |
$ | 6,274 | $ | 9,191 | ||||
Issuance of subordinated notes in connection with the acquisition
of businesses |
$ | 250 | $ | 8,230 | ||||
Change in fair value of derivatives |
$ | 479 | $ | (152 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1. Description of Business and Basis of Presentation
American Reprographics Company (ARC or the Company) is the leading reprographics company in
the United States providing business-to-business document management services to the architectural,
engineering and construction industry, or AEC industry. ARC also provides these services to
companies in non-AEC industries, such as technology, financial services, retail, entertainment, and
food and hospitality, that also require sophisticated document management services. The Company
conducts its operations through its wholly-owned operating subsidiary, American Reprographics
Company, L.L.C., a California limited liability company (Opco), and its subsidiaries.
Reorganization and Initial Public Offering
Prior to the consummation of the Companys initial public offering on February 9, 2005, the
Company was reorganized (the Reorganization) from a California limited liability company (American
Reprographics Holdings, L.L.C. or Holdings) to a Delaware corporation (American Reprographics
Company). In connection with the Reorganization, the members of Holdings exchanged their common
member units for common stock of ARC. Each option issued to purchase Holdings common member units
under Holdings equity option plan was exchanged for an option exercisable for shares of ARCs
common stock with the same exercise prices and vesting terms as the original grants. In addition,
all outstanding warrants to purchase common units of Holdings were exchanged for shares of ARCs
common stock.
On February 9, 2005, the Company closed an initial public offering (IPO) of its common stock
at $13.00 per share, consisting of 7,666,667 newly issued shares sold by the company and 5,683,333
outstanding shares sold by the selling stockholders. The Company used net proceeds from its IPO to
prepay $50.7 million of its $225 million senior second priority secured term loan facility and $9
million of its $100 million senior first priority secured term loan facility. As required by the
operating agreement of Holdings, the Company also repurchased all of the preferred equity of
Holdings upon the closing of the Companys initial public offering with $28.3 million of the net
proceeds from the IPO. Please see our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2005 and our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information concerning our IPO.
Due to their tax attributes, certain members of Holdings have in the past elected to receive
less than their proportionate share of distributions for income taxes as a result of a difference
in the tax basis of their equity interest in Holdings. In accordance with the terms of the
operating agreement of Holdings, the Company made a cash distribution of $8.2 million to such
members on February 9, 2005 in connection with the consummation of its IPO to bring their
proportionate share of tax distributions equal to the rest of the members of Holdings. These
distributions have been reclassified into additional paid-in capital in the Companys consolidated
balance sheet as of September 30, 2005 in connection with the Reorganization in February 2005. See
the accompanying consolidated statement of changes in stockholders equity for the nine months
ended September 30, 2005 for additional details regarding the changes in the Companys capital
accounts resulting from the Reorganization.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial
information and in conformity with the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. As
permitted under those rules, certain footnotes or other financial information required by GAAP for
complete financial statements have been condensed or omitted. In managements opinion, the interim
consolidated financial statements presented herein reflect all adjustments of a normal and
recurring nature that are necessary to fairly present the interim consolidated financial
statements. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation. The operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 are
not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31,
2005.
7
Table of Contents
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We
evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis and rely on historical experience and
various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances to determine such
estimates. Actual results could differ from those estimates and such differences may be material to
the consolidated financial statements.
These interim consolidated financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with
the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Companys 2004 Annual Report on
Form 10-K. The accounting policies used in preparing these interim consolidated financial
statements are the same as those described in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
2. Accounting for Equity-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for grants of options to employees to purchase its common stock using the
intrinsic value method in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25 and FIN No. 44, Accounting for
Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation. As permitted by SFAS No. 123 and as amended by
SFAS No. 148, the Company has chosen to continue to account for such option grants under APB
Opinion No. 25 and provide the expanded disclosures specified in SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS
No. 148.
Had compensation cost for the Companys option grants been determined based on their fair
value at the grant date for awards consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, the Companys
net income attributable to common stockholders and earnings per share for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2004 and 2005 would have been the adjusted pro forma amounts indicated below:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income: |
||||||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | `7,191 | $ | 10,518 | $ | 25,474 | $ | 57,464 | ||||||||
Equity-based employee
compensation cost, net of
related tax effects,
included in as reported
net income |
89 | 83 | 179 | 265 | ||||||||||||
Equity-based employee
compensation cost, net of
related tax effects,
that would have been
included in the
determination of net
income if the fair value
method had been applied |
(122 | ) | (106 | ) | (290 | ) | (350 | ) | ||||||||
Proforma |
$ | 7,158 | $ | 10,495 | $ | 25,363 | $ | 57,379 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | 0.20 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.72 | $ | 1.37 | ||||||||
Equity-based employee
compensation cost, net of
related tax effects,
included in as reported
net income |
| | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||||||||||||
Equity-based employee
compensation cost, net of
related tax effects, that
would have been included
in the determination of
net income if the fair
value method had been
applied |
| | (0.01 | ) | (0.01 | ) | ||||||||||
Proforma |
$ | 0.20 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.72 | $ | 1.37 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | 0.19 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.68 | $ | 1.33 | ||||||||
Equity-based employee
compensation cost, net of
related tax effects,
included in as reported
net income |
| | | 0.01 | ||||||||||||
Equity-based employee
compensation cost, net of
related tax effects, that
would have been included
in the determination of
net income if the fair
value method had been
applied |
| | (0.01 | ) | (0.01 | ) | ||||||||||
Proforma |
$ | 0.19 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.67 | $ | 1.33 | ||||||||
For purposes of computing the pro forma disclosures required by SFAS No. 123, the fair
value of each option granted to employees and directors is estimated using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions for the three months and nine
months ended September 30, 2004 and 2005: dividend yields of 0% for all periods; expected
volatility of 32.4% and 28.3%, respectively; risk-free interest rates of 3.0% and 2.9%,
respectively; and expected lives of 2.5 years for all periods.
8
Table of Contents
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of
traded options, which do not have vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition,
option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected
stock price volatility. Because the Companys employee stock options have characteristics
significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input
assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in managements opinion, the existing
models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock
options.
During 2004, the Company granted 307,915 options to purchase common membership units to
employees with exercise prices ranging from $5.62 to $6.85 per unit. The fair market value of the
Companys common member units on the date of grant was $16 per unit. In connection with the
issuances, the Company recorded a deferred compensation charge of $3.1 million in connection with
the issuance as the exercise price of the units was less than the estimated fair market value of
the Companys membership units as of the date of grant after giving consideration to the
anticipated fair value of the membership units during the one-year period preceding the Companys
initial public offering which was consummated on February 9, 2005. The Company will amortize the
deferred compensation charge over the vesting period of the options, generally five years. As of
September 30, 2005, the Company has cumulatively amortized $1.0 million of the deferred
compensation charge.
During the third quarter of 2005, the company issued 206,600 shares of its common stock
resulting from exercises of stock options in accordance with the American Reprographics Company
2005 Stock Plan which the Company adopted in connection with the consummation of its IPO in
February 2005. Such options were exercised at prices ranging from $4.87 to $6.85 per option,
resulting in approximately $1.0 million of cash proceeds to the company.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment. SFAS
No. 123R addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions in which a company receives
employee services in exchange for either equity instruments of the company or liabilities that are
based on the fair value of the companys equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance
of such equity instruments. SFAS No. 123R eliminates the ability to account for share-based
compensation transactions using the intrinsic method that is currently used and requires that such
transactions be accounted for using a fair value-based method and recognized as expense in the
consolidated statement of operations. The effective date of SFAS No. 123R was originally set for
interim and annual periods beginning after June 15, 2005. On April 15, 2005, the SEC adopted an
amendment to Regulation S-X that delays the date by which the Company must adopt SFAS No. 123R.
Under these new rules, the Company is required to adopt SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006, although
earlier adoption is permitted. The Company is in the process of reviewing the provisions of SFAS
No. 123R and plans to adopt this statement on January 1, 2006. However, the Company has made no
definitive decisions regarding transition methods or option valuation methods.
3. Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Company adopted the American Reprographics Company 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the
ESPP) in connection with the consummation of its IPO in February 2005. Under the ESPP, purchase
rights may be granted to eligible employees subject to a calendar year maximum per eligible
employee of the lesser of (i) 400 shares of common stock, or (ii) a number of shares of common
stock having an aggregate fair market value of $10,000 as determined on the date of purchase. The
purchase price of shares of common stock offered under the ESPP is equal to the lesser of 85% of
the fair market value of such shares of common stock (i) on the offering date, or (ii) on the
purchase date. The first day of an offering period is designated as the offering date.
In January 2005, the Companys Board of Directors authorized an initial offering of purchase
rights under the ESPP. The initial offering period began on February 3, 2005 and will end on April
30, 2007. Five purchase dates have been designated under such initial offering period, as follows:
July 31, 2005, December 31, 2005, June 30, 2006, December 31, 2006 and April 30, 2007.
During the third quarter of 2005, the Company issued 177,058 shares of its common stock to
approximately 840 eligible employees in accordance with the ESPP at a purchase price of $11.05 per
share, resulting in approximately $2.0 million of cash proceeds to the Company.
9
Table of Contents
4. Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following:
December 31, | September 30, | |||||||
2004 | 2005 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Borrowings from senior secured First Priority
Revolving Credit Facility; any unpaid principal and
interest due December 18, 2008 |
$ | | $ | | ||||
Borrowings from senior secured First Priority Term
Loan Credit Facility; variable interest payable
quarterly (5.26% and 5.52% interest rate at
December 31, 2004 and September 30, 2005,
respectively); principal payable in varying
quarterly installments; any unpaid principal and
interest due June 18, 2009 |
94,800 | 73,106 | ||||||
Borrowings from senior secured Second Priority
Term Loan Credit Facility; variable interest payable
quarterly (8.92% and 10.64% interest rate at
December 31, 2004 and September 30, 2005,
respectively); any unpaid principal and interest due
December 18, 2009 |
208,231 | 157,500 | ||||||
Various subordinated notes payable; interest ranging
from 5% to 11%; principal and interest payable
monthly through September 2010 |
4,833 | 10,170 | ||||||
Various capital leases; interest rates ranging to
15.9%; principal and interest payable monthly
through September 2009 |
14,688 | 18,705 | ||||||
322,552 | 259,481 | |||||||
Less debt discount on Second Priority Credit Facility |
(1,719 | ) | (1,180 | ) | ||||
320,833 | 258,301 | |||||||
Less current portion |
(10,276 | ) | (12,426 | ) | ||||
$ | 310,557 | $ | 245,875 | |||||
On February 9, 2005, the Company used a portion of the proceeds from its initial public
offering to prepay $50.7 million of its $225 million senior second priority secured term loan
facility and $9 million of its $100 million senior first priority secured term loan facility. As a
result of these debt prepayments, the Company wrote off $1.5 million of deferred financing costs in
February 2005 which is included in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.
On July 5, 2005, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Credit and Guaranty
Agreement (the Amended Credit Agreement) with its senior lenders which amended the structure of the
Companys senior secured first priority credit facilities in order to (i) support the Companys
growth initiatives which include, among others, strategic acquisitions and capital expenditures
for the opening of new branches and the expansion of facilities management programs, and (ii)
reduce the interest rate on the Companys borrowings under the First Priority Term Loan Credit
Facility. The significant amendments to the terms of the Companys senior secured credit
facilities include the following:
| The Companys existing First Priority Revolving Credit Facility and First Priority Term Loan Credit Facility was restructured into a new senior secured credit facility aggregating up to $122.3 million, consisting of a $77.3 million Tranche C Term Loan Facility, a $30 million Revolving Credit Facility, and permits the Company, as needed for the purpose of financing any future business acquisitions, to request the establishment of one or more new term loan commitments by an amount not to exceed $15 million in the aggregate. The terms and provisions of any such new term loans will be identical to the Tranche C Term Loan Facility, including, without limitation, with respect to amortization, interest and maturity. | ||
| Borrowings under the new Tranche C Term Loan Facility will bear an interest rate calculated at either (i) a Eurodollar rate plus 1.75% per annum, or (ii) an Index Rate, as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement, plus 0.75% per annum. This represents a 125-basis point reduction in the annual interest rate as compared to the annual interest rate on the Companys borrowings under the existing First Priority Term Loan Credit Facility which, prior to July 5, 2005, were subject to an interest rate equal to either (i) a Eurodollar rate plus 3.0% per annum, or (ii) an Index Rate, as defined in the existing credit agreement, plus 2.0% per annum. | ||
| Certain debt covenant thresholds were adjusted to make them less restrictive and thereby providing the Company with greater operating flexibility. Such adjustments include the following: |
o | An increase in the aggregate purchase price limitation for business acquisitions for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2005; |
10
Table of Contents
o | An increase in the limitation for the aggregate amount of new seller notes payable that may be issued in connection with business acquisitions; | ||
o | An increase in the annual threshold for earnout obligations that the Company may undertake in connection with business acquisitions; | ||
o | An increase in the threshold for capital expenditures during any trailing twelve-month period; | ||
o | An increase in the limitation on capital lease obligations outstanding; | ||
o | A reduction in the maximum leverage ratio threshold, as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement, from 4.90 to 3.75; | ||
o | Elimination of the scheduled increase in the fixed charge coverage ratio threshold. In accordance with the Amended Credit Agreement, the fixed charge coverage ratio threshold will remain constant at 1.10. |
Except as described above, all other material terms and conditions, including the maturity
dates, of the Companys existing senior secured credit facilities remained similar to those as
described in Note 4 Long-Term Debt to our consolidated financial statements included in our
2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Amended Credit Agreement is not considered to represent a significant modification for
financial reporting purposes. As a result, the Company capitalized the $0.2 million of amendment
fees incurred as debt issuance costs which will be amortized over the term of the Amended Credit
Agreement. Professional fees and other related costs incurred in connection with the Amended
Credit Agreement were expensed as incurred.
5. Income Taxes
Holdings and Opco, through which a substantial portion of the Companys business was operated
prior to the Reorganization, are limited liability companies which are taxed as partnerships. As a
result, the members of Holdings pay income taxes on the earnings of Opco, which are passed through
to Holdings. In accordance with Holdings operating agreement, Holdings made cash distributions to
its members to provide them with funds to pay taxes owed for their share of Holdings profits as a
limited liability company.
Certain divisions are consolidated in Holdings and are treated as separate corporate entities
for income tax purposes (the consolidated corporations). Prior to the Reorganization, these
consolidated corporations paid income taxes and recorded provisions for income taxes in their
financial statements. As a result of the Companys reorganization to a Delaware corporation in
February 2005, ARCs consolidated earnings became subject to federal, state and local taxes at a
combined statutory rate of approximately 42%.
The Companys income tax provision (benefit) for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2004 and 2005 are as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Current: |
||||||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | 1,527 | $ | 5,136 | $ | 4,930 | $ | 13,747 | ||||||||
State |
444 | 1,293 | 1,321 | 3,156 | ||||||||||||
1,971 | 6,429 | 6,251 | 16,903 | |||||||||||||
Deferred: |
||||||||||||||||
Deferred income tax provision, excluding the effects of the Reorganization |
(12 | ) | 589 | 689 | 2,719 | |||||||||||
Income tax provision, excluding the effects of the Reorganization |
1,959 | 7,018 | 6,940 | 19,622 | ||||||||||||
Deferred income tax benefit as a result of the Reorganization |
| | | (27,701 | ) | |||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
$ | 1,959 | $ | 7,018 | $ | 6,940 | $ | (8,079 | ) | |||||||
11
Table of Contents
The Companys net income tax benefit of $8.1 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 includes a one-time deferred income tax benefit of $27.7 million recorded in
February 2005 in connection with the Companys reorganization from a California limited liability
company (LLC) to a Delaware corporation. This non-recurring income tax benefit is related to the
setting up of the deferred income tax accounts from the assets and liabilities that were previously
in the LLC, primarily comprised of tax-deductible goodwill and other temporary differences. This
resulted in an increase in net deferred tax assets of $27.7 million and a corresponding deferred
income tax benefit for the same amount.
12
Table of Contents
p
The Companys consolidated deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2004 and
September 30, 2005 consist of the following:
December 31, | September 30, | |||||||
2004 | 2005 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Deferred tax assets (liabilities): |
||||||||
Current portion: |
||||||||
Financial statement accruals not currently deductible |
$ | 1,206 | $ | 2,738 | ||||
State taxes |
158 | 159 | ||||||
Net current deferred tax assets |
1,364 | 2,897 | ||||||
Non-current portion: |
||||||||
Excess of income tax basis over net book value for
financial reporting purposes of intangible assets |
| 32,172 | ||||||
Excess of income tax basis over net book value for
financial reporting purposes of property, plant and
equipment |
| 2,276 | ||||||
Deferred stock-based compensation |
| 388 | ||||||
Excess of net book value for financial reporting
purposes over income tax basis of property, plant
and equipment |
(1,653 | ) | | |||||
Excess of net book value for financial reporting
purposes over income tax basis of intangible assets |
(3,981 | ) | (17,021 | ) | ||||
Net non-current deferred tax assets (liabilities) |
(5,634 | ) | 17,815 | |||||
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) |
$ | (4,270 | ) | $ | 20,712 | |||
A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the Companys effective tax
rate is as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Statutory federal income tax rate |
34.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 34.0 | % | 35.0 | % | ||||||||
State taxes |
3.5 | % | 4.8 | % | 3.5 | % | 4.8 | % | ||||||||
Income of the LLC not taxed at the LLC level |
(17.7 | )% | | (17.7 | )% | (0.3 | )% | |||||||||
Other |
1.6 | % | 0.3 | % | 1.6 | % | 0.2 | % | ||||||||
Effective income tax rate before non-recurring income tax benefit due to Reorganization |
21.4 | % | 40.1 | % | 21.4 | % | 39.7 | % | ||||||||
Non-recurring income tax benefit due to reorganization |
| | | (56.0 | )% | |||||||||||
Effective income tax rate |
21.4 | % | 40.1 | % | 21.4 | % | (16.3 | )% | ||||||||
6. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is a creditor and participant in the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy of Louis Frey Company,
Inc., or LF Co., which is pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New
York. The Company managed LF Co. under a contract from May through September of 2003. LF Co. filed
for Bankruptcy protection in August 2003, and the proceeding was converted to a Chapter 7
liquidation in October 2003. On or about June 30, 2004, the Bankruptcy Estate Trustee filed a
complaint in the LF Co. Bankruptcy proceeding against the Company, which was amended on or about
July 19, 2004, alleging, among other things, breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duties,
conversion, unjust enrichment, tortious interference with contract, unfair competition and false
commercial promotion in violation of The Lanham Act, misappropriation of trade secrets and fraud
regarding the Companys handling of the assets of LF Co. The Trustee claims damages of not less
than $9.5 million, as well as punitive damages and treble damages with respect to the Lanham Act
claims. Previously, on or about October 10, 2003, a secured creditor of LF Co., Merrill Lynch
Business Financial Services, Inc., or Merrill, had filed a complaint in the LF Co. Bankruptcy
proceeding against the Company, which was most recently amended on or about July 6, 2004. Merrills
claims are duplicated in the Trustees suit. The Company, in turn, has filed answers and
counterclaims denying liability to the Trustee and seeking reimbursement of all costs and damages
sustained as a result of the Trustees actions and in the Companys efforts to assist LF Co. The
Company believes that it has meritorious defenses as well as substantial counterclaims against
Merrill Lynch and the Trustee. The Company intends to vigorously contest the above matters. Based
on the discovery and depositions to date, the Company does not believe
13
Table of Contents
that the outcome of the above matters will have a material adverse impact on its results of
operations or financial condition.
The Company may be involved in litigation and other legal matters from time to time in the
normal course of business. Management does not believe that the outcome of any of these matters
will have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
7. Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income includes changes in the fair value of certain financial derivative
instruments which qualify for hedge accounting. The differences between net income and
comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2005 are as
follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
Sept 30, | Sept 30, | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 7,191 | $ | 10,518 | $ | 25,474 | $ | 57,464 | ||||||||
Increase
(Decrease) in
fair value of
financial
derivative
instruments, net
of tax effects |
(552 | ) | (133 | ) | 479 | (152 | ) | |||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 6,639 | $ | 10,385 | $ | 25,953 | $ | 57,312 | ||||||||
8. Earnings Per Share
The Company accounts for earnings per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings per
Share. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number
of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed similar to
basic earnings per share except that the denominator is increased to include the number of
additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been
issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. Common stock equivalents are excluded
from the computation if their effect is anti-dilutive. There are no common stock equivalents
excluded for anti-dilutive effects for the periods presented below. The Companys common stock
equivalents consist of stock options issued under the Companys equity option plan, as well as
warrants to purchase common stock issued during 2000 to certain creditors of the Company. All of
such warrants were exchanged for shares of common stock of the Company in connection with the
Companys reorganization in February 2005 as discussed in the Reorganization and Initial Public
Offering section in Note 1.
Basic and diluted earnings per share were calculated using the following common shares for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2005:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding during the period basic |
35,487,511 | 44,170,226 | 35,487,511 | 42,080,404 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive stock options |
1,154,077 | 844,138 | 1,154,077 | 844,138 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive warrants |
832,069 | | 832,069 | 133,637 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding during the period diluted |
37,473,657 | 45,014,364 | 37,473,657 | 43,058,179 | ||||||||||||
9. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs, an amendment of Accounting
Research Bulletin No. 43, Chapter 4. SFAS No. 151 requires that abnormal amounts of idle facility
expense, freight, handling costs and wasted materials (spoilage) be recorded as current period
charges and that the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory be based on the normal
capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for the Company on January 1,
2006. The Company does not believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 151 will have a material impact on
its consolidated financial statements.
14
Table of Contents
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment
of APB Opinion No. 29. SFAS No. 153 is based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets
should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting
for Nonmonetary Transactions, provided an exception to its basic measurement principle (fair
value) for exchanges of similar productive assets. Under APB Opinion No. 29, an exchange of a
productive asset for a similar productive asset was based on the recorded amount of the asset
relinquished. SFAS No. 153 eliminates this exception and replaces it with an exception of exchanges
of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. The Company does not believe that the
adoption of SFAS No. 153 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial
statements and the related notes included in this report, as well as Managements Discussion and
Analysis included in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In addition to historical information, this report on Form 10-Q contains certain
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended. These statements relate to future events or future financial performance, and
include statements regarding the Companys business strategy, timing of, and plans for, the
introduction of new products and enhancements, future sales, market growth and direction,
competition, market share, revenue growth, operating margins and profitability. All
forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that
may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially
different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements, expressed or
implied, by these forward looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking
statements by terminology such as may, will, should, expects, intends, plans,
anticipates, believes, estimates, predicts, potential, continue, or the negative of
these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and are based
upon information available to the Company as of the date of this report. We undertake no on-going
obligation, other than that imposed by law, to update these forward-looking statements.
Actual results could differ materially from our current expectations. Factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations, include among others, the
following: (i) general economic conditions, such as changes in non-residential construction
spending, GDP growth, interest rates, employment rates, office vacancy rates, and government
expenditures; (ii) a downturn in the architectural, engineering and construction industry; (iii)
competition in our industry and innovation by our competitors; (iv) our failure to anticipate and
adapt to future changes in our industry; (v) failure to continue to develop and introduce new
products and services successfully; (vi) our inability to charge for value-added services we
provide our customers to offset potential declines in print volume; (vii) adverse developments
affecting the State of California, including general and local economic conditions, macroeconomic
trends, and natural disasters; (viii) our inability to successfully identify and manage our
acquisitions or open new branches; (ix) our inability to successfully monitor and manage the
business operations of our subsidiaries and uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of financial
and management policies and procedures we established to improve accounting controls; (x) adverse
developments concerning our relationships with certain key vendors; and (xi) the loss of key
personnel and qualified technical staff.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are
reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.
These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but
not limited to, the risks and uncertainties described in the Risk Factors section of our 2004
Annual Report on Form 10-K. You are urged to carefully consider these factors. All
forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by the
foregoing cautionary statements.
Overview
We are the leading reprographics company in the United States providing business-to-business
document management services to the architectural, engineering and construction industry, or AEC
industry. We also provide
15
Table of Contents
these services to companies in non-AEC industries, such as the technology, financial services,
retail, entertainment, and food and hospitality industries, that also require sophisticated
document management services.
We operate more than 200 reprographics service centers in over 150 cities in 30 states
throughout the United States and the District of Columbia including four reprographics service
centers in the Toronto metropolitan area and one in Mexico City, Mexico. Our reprographics service
centers are located in close proximity to the majority of our customers and offer pickup and
delivery services within a 15 to 30 mile radius. These service centers are arranged in a hub and
satellite structure and are digitally connected as a cohesive network, allowing us to provide our
services both locally and nationally. We serve more than 65,000 active customers and employ over
3,600 people, including a sales force of approximately 280 employees.
On February 9, 2005, the Company closed an initial public offering (IPO) of its common stock
at $13.00 per share, consisting of 7,666,667 newly issued shares sold by the company and 5,683,333
outstanding shares sold by the selling stockholders. The Company used net proceeds from its IPO to
prepay $50.7 million of its $225 million senior second priority secured term loan facility and $9
million of its $100 million senior first priority secured term loan facility. As required by the
operating agreement of Holdings, the Company also repurchased all of the preferred equity of
Holdings upon the closing of the Companys initial public offering with $28.3 million of the net
proceeds from the IPO. Please see our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2005 and our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information concerning our IPO.
The key financial measures used by our management to operate and assess the performance of our
business are Net Sales and Costs and Expenses. These factors are discussed in the Key Financial
Measures section of Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operation in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Non-GAAP Measures
EBIT and EBITDA (and related ratios presented in this report) are supplemental measures of our
performance that are not required by, or presented in accordance with GAAP. These measures are not
measurements of our financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives
to net income, income from operations, or any other performance measures derived in accordance with
GAAP or as an alternative to cash flow from operating, investing or financing activities as a
measure of our liquidity.
EBIT represents net income before interest and taxes. EBITDA represents net income before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. We present EBIT and EBITDA (and related ratios
presented in this report) because we consider them important supplemental measures of our
performance and liquidity and believe that such measures are meaningful to investors because they
are used by management for the reasons discussed below.
We use EBIT as a metric to measure and compare the performance of our divisions. We operate
our 40 divisions as separate business units, but manage debt and taxation at the corporate level.
As a result, EBIT is the best measure of divisional profitability and the most useful metric by
which to measure and compare the performance of our divisions. We also use EBIT as a metric to
measure performance for the purpose of determining compensation at the division level and use
EBITDA to measure performance and determine compensation at the consolidated level. We also use
EBITDA as a metric to manage cash flow from our divisions to the corporate level and to determine
the financial health of each division. As noted above, because our divisions do not incur interest
or income tax expense, the cash flow from each division should be equal to the corresponding EBITDA
of each division, assuming no other changes to a divisions balance sheet. As a result, we
reconcile EBITDA to cash flow on a monthly basis as one of our key internal controls. We also use
EBIT and EBITDA to evaluate potential acquisitions and to evaluate whether to incur capital
expenditures. In addition, certain covenants in our credit agreements require compliance with
financial ratios based on EBITDA, adjusted for certain items as defined in our credit agreements.
EBIT and EBITDA (and related ratios presented in this report) have limitations as analytical
tools, and you should not consider them in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our
results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:
they do not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements for capital expenditures
and contractual commitments;
16
Table of Contents
they do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;
they do not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to
service interest or principal payments on our debt;
although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated
and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA does not reflect any cash
requirements for such replacements.
Because of these limitations, EBIT and EBITDA (and related ratios presented in this report)
should not be considered as measures of discretionary cash available to us to invest in the growth
of our business or reduce our indebtedness. We compensate for these limitations by relying
primarily on our GAAP results and using EBIT and EBITDA only supplementally.
The following is a reconciliation of cash flows provided by operating activities to EBIT,
EBITDA and net income:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Cash flows provided by operating activities |
$ | 13,736 | $ | 17,998 | $ | 42,419 | $ | 42,587 | ||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
(99 | ) | (976 | ) | 2,609 | 8,723 | ||||||||||
Non-cash expenses, including depreciation
and amortization, and excluding
deferred income taxes |
(6,458 | ) | (5,915 | ) | (18,865 | ) | (18,828 | ) | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
12 | (589 | ) | (689 | ) | 24,982 | ||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
1,959 | 7,018 | 6,940 | (8,079 | ) | |||||||||||
Interest expense |
8,559 | 6,131 | 25,089 | 20,649 | ||||||||||||
EBIT |
17,709 | 23,667 | 57,503 | 70,034 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
4,753 | 5,018 | 14,006 | 13,907 | ||||||||||||
EBITDA |
22,462 | 28,685 | 71,509 | 83,941 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(8,559 | ) | (6,131 | ) | (25,089 | ) | (20,649 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax (provision) benefit |
(1,959 | ) | (7,018 | ) | (6,940 | ) | 8,079 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(4,753 | ) | (5,018 | ) | (14,006 | ) | (13,907 | ) | ||||||||
Net income |
$ | 7,191 | $ | 10,518 | $ | 25,474 | $ | 57,464 | ||||||||
17
Table of Contents
The following is a reconciliation of net income to EBIT and EBITDA:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 7,191 | $ | 10,518 | $ | 25,474 | $ | 57,464 | ||||||||
Interest expense, net |
8,559 | 6,131 | 25,089 | 20,649 | ||||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
1,959 | 7,018 | 6,940 | (8,079 | ) | |||||||||||
EBIT |
17,709 | 23,667 | 57,503 | 70,034 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
4,753 | 5,018 | 14,006 | 13,907 | ||||||||||||
EBITDA |
$ | 22,462 | $ | 28,685 | $ | 71,509 | $ | 83,941 | ||||||||
The following is a reconciliation of our net income margin to our EBIT margin and EBITDA
margin:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income margin |
6.5 | % | 8.3 | % | 7.6 | % | 15.6 | % | ||||||||
Interest expense, net |
7.8 | % | 4.8 | % | 7.5 | % | 5.6 | % | ||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
1.8 | % | 5.5 | % | 2.1 | % | (2.2 | %) | ||||||||
EBIT margin |
16.1 | % | 18.6 | % | 17.1 | % | 18.9 | % | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
4.3 | % | 3.9 | % | 4.2 | % | 3.8 | % | ||||||||
EBITDA margin |
20.4 | % | 22.5 | % | 21.3 | % | 22.7 | % | ||||||||
Impact of Conversion from an LLC to a Corporation
Immediately prior to our initial public offering in February 2005, we reorganized from a
California limited liability company (LLC) to a Delaware corporation, American Reprographics
Company (the Reorganization). In connection with the Reorganization, we recorded a one-time
deferred income tax benefit of $27.7 million in February 2005 related to the setting up of the
deferred income tax accounts from the assets that were previously in the LLC, primarily comprised
of tax-deductible goodwill. This resulted in an increase in our deferred tax assets of $27.7
million and a corresponding deferred income tax benefit for the same amount. See Note 5 Income
Taxes to our consolidated financial statements included in this report for additional details
concerning this non-recurring deferred income tax benefit recorded in connection with the
Reorganization.
Going forward after the consummation of the Reorganization, we do not expect any significant
impact on our operations as a result of the Reorganization apart from an increase in our effective
tax rate due to corporate level taxes, which will be offset by the elimination of tax distributions
to our members and the recognition of deferred income taxes upon our conversion from a California
limited liability company to a Delaware corporation.
Income Taxes
Holdings and Opco, through which a substantial portion of our business was operated prior to
our reorganization in February 2005, are limited liability companies which are taxed as
partnerships. As a result, the members of Holdings paid income taxes on the earnings of Opco which
were passed through to Holdings. Certain divisions were consolidated in Holdings and were treated
as separate corporate entities for income tax purposes (the consolidated corporations). These
consolidated corporations paid income tax and record provisions for income taxes
18
Table of Contents
in their financial statements. See Note 5 Income Taxes to our consolidated financial
statements included in this report for additional details concerning income taxes.
The unaudited pro forma incremental income tax provision and unaudited proforma earnings per
common member unit amounts reflected in the following table were calculated as if our
Reorganization became effective on January 1, 2004, and excludes the one-time deferred income tax
benefit of $27.7 million recorded in February 2005 in connection with our Reorganization. Our
effective income tax rate during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, calculated as
if our Reorganization became effective on January 1, 2004 and excluding the $27.7 million
non-recurring deferred income tax benefit, was 40.0% and 40.4%, respectively. These are lower than
our proforma effective income tax rate of 45.2% for the same periods in 2004 primarily due to the
nondeductible interest expense on our preferred equity which was redeemed in February 2005.
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 7,191 | $ | 10,518 | $ | 25,474 | $ | 57,464 | ||||||||
Deferred income tax benefit due to Reorganization |
| | | (27,701 | ) | |||||||||||
Proforma net income, excluding deferred income
tax benefit due to Reorganization |
7,191 | 10,518 | 25,474 | 29,763 | ||||||||||||
Unaudited pro forma incremental
income tax provision |
(2,178 | ) | | (7,714 | ) | (333 | ) | |||||||||
Unaudited pro forma net income |
$ | 5,013 | $ | 10,518 | $ | 17,760 | $ | 29,430 | ||||||||
Unaudited pro forma earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.14 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.50 | $ | 0.70 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.47 | $ | 0.68 |
Results of Operations
The following table provides information on the percentages of certain items of selected
financial data compared to total net sales for the periods indicated:
As a Percentage of Net Sales | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2004 | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | |||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Reprographics services |
74.9 | % | 74.3 | % | 75.3 | % | 75.0 | % | ||||||||
Facilities management |
16.8 | 16.9 | 16.0 | 16.7 | ||||||||||||
Equipment and supplies sales |
8.3 | 8.8 | 8.7 | 8.3 | ||||||||||||
Total net sales |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
59.8 | 58.8 | 58.5 | 58.2 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
40.2 | 41.2 | 41.5 | 41.8 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
23.8 | 22.2 | 24.2 | 22.6 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
0.4 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.4 | ||||||||||||
Income from operations |
16.1 | 18.5 | 16.9 | 18.9 | ||||||||||||
Other income |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(7.8 | ) | (4.8 | ) | (7.5 | ) | (5.6 | ) | ||||||||
Income before income tax provision (benefit) |
8.3 | 13.8 | 9.6 | 13.4 | ||||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
1.8 | 5.5 | 2.1 | (2.2 | ) | |||||||||||
Net income |
6.5 | % | 8.3 | % | 7.6 | % | 15.6 | % | ||||||||
19
Table of Contents
Our operating results remained strong during the third quarter of 2005 due to continued
high demand for commercial office space nationwide driven by strong job creation and continued
expansion of the overall economy. Our efforts to expand our national footprint of reprographics
centers as well as our facilities management programs have also been important contributors to the
growth in our net sales.
We continue to focus on our key opportunities, which include: the expansion of our market
share, our national footprint of reprographics centers, and our facilities management programs; the
establishment of our PlanWell technology as the industry standard for procuring digital
reprographics online; and the expansion of our service offerings to non-AEC related industries.
Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 Compared to Three and Nine Months Ended September
30, 2004
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | Incr (Decr) | September 30, | Incr (Decr) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2005 | $ | % | 2004 | 2005 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) (Dollars in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reprographics services |
82.5 | 94.7 | 12.2 | 14.8 | % | 253.4 | 277.1 | 23.7 | 9.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Facilities management |
18.5 | 21.6 | 3.1 | 16.8 | % | 53.7 | 61.8 | 8.1 | 15.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Equipment and supplies sales |
9.2 | 11.2 | 2.0 | 21.7 | % | 29.2 | 30.6 | 1.4 | 4.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total net sales |
110.2 | 127.5 | 17.3 | 15.7 | % | 336.3 | 369.5 | 33.2 | 9.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
44.3 | 52.5 | 8.2 | 18.5 | % | 139.6 | 154.5 | 14.9 | 10.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
26.2 | 28.3 | 2.1 | 8.0 | % | 81.4 | 83.3 | 1.9 | 2.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
8.6 | 6.1 | (2.5 | ) | -29.1 | % | 25.1 | 20.6 | (4.5 | ) | -17.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
2.0 | 7.0 | 5.0 | 250.0 | % | 6.9 | (8.1 | ) | (15.0 | ) | -217.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
7.2 | 10.5 | 3.3 | 45.8 | % | 25.5 | 57.5 | 32.0 | 125.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
EBITDA |
22.5 | 28.7 | 6.2 | 27.6 | % | 71.5 | 83.9 | 12.4 | 17.3 | % |
Net Sales. Net sales during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 continued
to increase compared to last year primarily due to the continued overall improvement of the U.S.
economy, the growth of our facilities management business, the expansion of our revenue base
through the opening of new branches and acquisitions, and by increasing our market share in certain
markets. Prices during this period remained relatively stable, indicating that our revenue
increases were primarily volume driven.
Gross Profit. Our gross profit increased by $8.2 million and $14.9 million during the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior
year, primarily due to the increase in our net sales. Our production overhead as a percentage of
net sales during the third quarter of 2005 continued to decrease due to the fixed cost nature of
this expense coupled with the increase in our net sales. As a result, our overall gross margin
during the three months ended September 30, 2005 increased to 41.2% compared to 40.2% during the
same period last year.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
(SG&A) increased by $2.1 million or 8.0% during the three months ended September 30, 2005 from a
year earlier due to an increase in our selling and marketing costs due to higher sales commissions
related to increased sales, higher legal and accounting fees as a result of the reporting and
compliance requirements we became subject to since our initial public offering in February 2005,
and higher incentive bonus accruals related to improved operating results compared to last year.
As a percentage of net sales during the three months ended September 30, 2005, SG&A decreased from
23.8% in 2004 to 22.2% in 2005 due to our successful cost cutting efforts and gains in operating
efficiency, combined with higher net sales.
Interest Expense. Net interest expense during the three months ended September 30, 2005
decreased by $2.5 million compared to 2004 because we have made approximately $119.3 million of net
principal paydowns on our debt obligations since September 30, 2004. Of this amount, approximately
$89 million came from proceeds from our IPO in February 2005, and the remainder of our debt
paydowns came from our internally generated cash flow. Our net interest expense during the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 reflects a $1.5 million write-off of
deferred financing costs in February 2005 resulting from the principal prepayment on our
senior credit facilities with
20
Table of Contents
the proceeds from our IPO. Excluding this $1.5 million write-off,
our net interest expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2005 decreased by $6 million
from the same period in 2004. The decline in our net interest expense resulting from the reduction
of our total debt obligations has been partially offset by rising interest rates. The weighted
average interest rate on our variable rate debt has increased to 9.0% as of September 30, 2005
compared to 7.4% as of September 30, 2004.
Income Taxes. Our income tax provision during the third quarter increased from $2.0 million
in 2004 to $7.0 million in 2005 because of our reorganization from a California limited liability
company (LLC) to a Delaware corporation in February 2005 in conjunction with our IPO. Prior to our
reorganization, a substantial portion of our companys business was operated in an LLC, taxed as a
partnership. As a result, the members of the LLC pay the income taxes on the earnings, not the
LLC. Accordingly, no income taxes were provided on these earnings. During the third quarter of
2004, the LLC had book income of $16.9 million which was not subject to tax at the LLC level.
Including the proforma incremental income tax provision that would have applied had we been a
Delaware corporation since the beginning of last year, our income tax provision increased from $4.1
million during the third quarter of 2004 to $7.4 million for the same period in 2005 due to an
increase in our taxable income. Our proforma effective income tax rate during the third quarter
decreased from 45.2% in 2004 to 40.0% in 2005 primarily due to the nondeductible interest expense
on our preferred equity which was redeemed in February 2005.
We have a net income tax benefit of $8.1 million during the nine months ended September 30,
2005 resulting from the one-time income tax benefit of $27.7 million recorded in connection with
our reorganization from an LLC to a Delaware corporation in February 2005. This non-recurring
income tax benefit is related to the setting up of the deferred income tax accounts from the assets
that were previously in the LLC, primarily comprised of tax-amortizable goodwill. This resulted in
an increase in our deferred tax assets of $27.7 million and a corresponding deferred income tax
benefit for the same amount. Excluding this non-recurring deferred income tax benefit, our income
tax provision during the nine months ended September 2005 amounted to $19.6 million compared to
$6.9 million in 2004, or an increase of $12.7 million over the same period in 2004. This is
primarily due to (i) our reorganization from an LLC to a Delaware corporation in February 2005, and
(ii) an increase in our pretax income during the nine months ended September 2005. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2004, the LLC had book income of $16.9 million which was not subject to
tax at the LLC level compared to $0.4 million during the same period in 2005.
Our overall proforma effective income tax rate during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2005 decreased to 40.0% and 40.4%, respectively, compared to 45.2% for the same
periods in 2004 primarily due to the nondeductible interest expense on our preferred equity which
was redeemed in February 2005.
Net Income. Net income increased by $3.3 million or 45.8% in the third quarter of 2005
compared to the same period in 2004 primarily due to higher revenues and lower interest expense.
Net income during the nine months ended September 2005 increased by $32.0 million primarily due to
the $27.7 million non-recurring income tax benefit recognized during 2005 due to our reorganization
in February 2005. This was offset by the increase in our income tax provision due to our companys
reorganization from an LLC to a Delaware corporation and the $1.5 million write-off of deferred
financing costs during the first quarter of 2005.
EBITDA. Our EBITDA margin during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 increased
to 22.5% and 22.7%, respectively, compared to 20.4% and 21.3% for the comparable periods in 2004,
respectively, primarily due to higher revenues. For a reconciliation of EBITDA to net income,
please see - Non-GAAP Measures above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of cash have been cash provided by our operations and borrowings under
our bank credit facilities or debt agreements. Our historical uses of cash have been for payment of
principal and interest on outstanding debt obligations, acquisitions of reprographics businesses,
capital expenditures, and, prior to the Reorganization in February 2005, tax-related distributions
to Holdings members. Supplemental information pertaining to our historical sources and uses of
cash is presented as follows and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated statements of
cash flows and notes thereto included in this report.
21
Table of Contents
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2004 | 2005 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 42,419 | $ | 42,587 | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
$ | (7,611 | ) | $ | (19,710 | ) | ||
Net cash used in financing activities |
$ | (40,115 | ) | $ | (23,875 | ) | ||
Net cash provided by operating activities of $42.6 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 was primarily comprised of net income, net of non-cash related expenses which
include a $1.5 million non-recurring write-off of our deferred financing costs in connection with
the early retirement of debt from our IPO proceeds during February 2005. This was offset by the
non-cash related benefit from net deferred income taxes of $25.0 million during the nine months
ended September 2005. The primary working capital uses of cash during the nine months ended
September 2005 were the increase in our accounts receivables of $7.1 million primarily related to
our increased sales and the $3.5 million decrease in our accounts payable and accrued expenses
mainly due to the timing of interest payments, as well as payments on trade payables and other
accrued expenses.
Net cash used in investing activities of $19.7 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2005 primarily relates to acquisition of businesses and capital expenditures. Our cash used in
investing activities increased during the first nine months of 2005 because of higher cash outlays
for business acquisitions, which was offset by lower cash outlays for capital expenditures due to
our increased use of capital leases in 2005 to finance our procurement of production equipment.
Net cash used in financing activities of $23.9 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2005 primarily relates to payments on long-term debt under our debt agreements and cash
distributions to members. These are offset by the proceeds from borrowings under our debt
agreements, as well as proceeds from the issuance of our common stock. We utilized the net
proceeds from our IPO in February 2005 to redeem Holdings preferred equity and to pay down our
senior secured credit facilities. In connection with our IPO, we also made a cash distribution of
$8.2 million to certain members of Holdings which we funded through borrowings on our revolving
credit facility during the first quarter of 2005. Because of strong cash flow generated from our
operations, we did not utilize our revolving credit facility during the third quarter of 2005 and
we currently have no outstanding borrowings on our revolving credit facility.
Our cash position, working capital and debt obligations as of December 31, 2004 and September
30, 2005 are shown below and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated balance sheets and
notes thereto included in this report.
December 31, | September 30, | |||||||
2004 | 2005 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 13,826 | $ | 12,828 | ||||
Working capital |
22,773 | 31,119 | ||||||
Debt obligations: |
||||||||
Borrowings from senior secured credit facilities |
301,312 | 229,426 | ||||||
Mandatorily redeemable preferred membership units |
27,814 | | ||||||
Other debt obligations |
19,521 | 28,875 | ||||||
Total debt obligations |
$ | 348,647 | $ | 258,301 | ||||
22
Table of Contents
We expect a positive impact on our liquidity and results of operations going forward due
to lower interest expense resulting from the approximately $119.3 million of net principal paydowns
we have made on our total debt obligations since September 30, 2004. As discussed in Note 4
Long-Term Debt to our consolidated financial statements set forth in Item 1 of this report, we
entered into an amendment to our senior secured credit facilities in July 2005 which, among other
amendments, reduced the interest rate applicable to borrowings on our First Priority Term Loan
Credit Facility by 125 basis points.
The factors discussed above which are expected to reduce our interest expense will be offset
to a certain extent by rising market interest rates on our debt obligations under our senior
secured credit facilities which are subject to variable interest rates. As discussed in
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk, we had $258.3 million of total debt
obligations outstanding as of September 30, 2005 of which $229.4 million was bearing interest at
variable rates approximating 9.0% on a weighted average basis as of September 30, 2005. A 1.0%
change in interest rates on our variable rate debt would have resulted in interest expense
fluctuating by approximately $0.6 million and $1.9 million during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2005, respectively.
We believe that our cash flow provided by operations will be adequate to cover our 2005
working capital needs, debt service requirements and planned capital expenditures to the extent
such items are known or are reasonably determinable based on current business and market
conditions. However, we may elect to finance certain of our capital expenditure requirements
through borrowings under our credit facilities or the issuance of additional debt through capital
lease agreements.
We continually evaluate potential acquisitions. We expect to fund future acquisitions through
cash flow provided by operations, additional borrowings or the issuance of our equity. The extent
to which we will be willing or able to use our equity or a mix of equity and cash payments to make
acquisitions will depend on the market value of our shares from time to time and the willingness of
potential sellers to accept equity as full or partial payment.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of December 31, 2004 and September 30, 2005, we did not have any relationships with
unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured
finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of
facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
23
Table of Contents
Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments
Our future contractual obligations as of September 30, 2005 by fiscal year are as follows:
Three Months | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, | Twelve Months Ending December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | Thereafter | |||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt obligations |
$ | 1,191 | $ | 3,167 | $ | 2,223 | $ | 39,446 | $ | 192,603 | $ | 1,074 | ||||||||||||
Capital lease obligations |
2,032 | 6,720 | 5,124 | 2,913 | 1,143 | 662 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations |
9,008 | 25,732 | 17,951 | 11,415 | 7,601 | 16,674 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 12,231 | $ | 35,619 | $ | 25,298 | $ | 53,774 | $ | 201,347 | $ | 18,410 | ||||||||||||
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
Our primary exposure to market risk is interest rate risk associated with our debt
instruments. We use both fixed and variable rate debt as sources of financing. We had an interest
rate hedge agreement which expired in September 2005 and two interest rate collar agreements, one
of which expired in September 2005 and the other expires in December 2006. Except as set forth
below, there have been no material changes in market risk from the information reported in Item 7A
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk in our 2004 Annual Report on Form
10-K.
At September 30, 2005, we had $258.3 million of total debt obligations of which $229.4 million
was bearing interest at variable rates approximating 9.0% on a weighted average basis. A 1.0%
change in interest rates on our variable rate debt would have resulted in interest expense
fluctuating by approximately $0.6 million and $1.9 million during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2005, respectively.
We have not, and do not plan to, enter into any derivative financial instruments for trading
or speculative purposes. As of September 30, 2005, we had no other significant material exposure to
market risk, including foreign exchange risk and commodity risks.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded,
processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and
Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to
our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate,
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of
our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of September 30, 2005. Based on that evaluation, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of September 30, 2005, these
disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes to internal controls over financial reporting during the third quarter
ended September 30, 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
24
Table of Contents
PART II
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Our senior secured credit facilities contain restrictive covenants which, among other things,
provide limitations on capital expenditures, restrictions on indebtedness and dividend
distributions to our stockholders. Additionally, we are required to meet debt covenants based on
certain financial ratio thresholds, including minimum interest coverage, maximum leverage and
minimum fixed charge coverage ratios. The credit facilities also limit our ability and the ability
of our domestic subsidiaries to, among other things, incur liens, make certain investments, sell
certain assets, engage in reorganizations or mergers, or change the character of our business. We
are in compliance with all such covenants as of September 30, 2005.
25
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Number | Description | |
10.1
|
Amendment to Lease for the premises commonly known as 17721 Mitchell North, Irvine, CA, effective as of August 2, 2005, by and between SUMO HOLDINGS IRVINE, LLC, Lessor and AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY, L.L.C., Lessee. * | |
10.2
|
Amendment to Lease for the premises commonly known as 934 and 940 Venice Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA, effective as of August 2, 2005, by and between SUMO HOLDINGS LA, LLC, Landlord and AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY, L.L.C. (formerly known as FORD GRAPHICS GROUP, L.L.C.) Tenant.* | |
10.3
|
Amendment to Lease for the premises commonly known as 18810 Woodfield Road, Gaithersburg, MD, effective as of August 2, 2005, by and between SUMO HOLDINGS MARYLAND, LLC, Landlord and LEET-MELBROOK, INC., Tenant. * | |
10.4
|
Amendment to Lease for the premises commonly known as 1322 V Street, Sacramento, CA, effective as of August 2, 2005, by and between SUMO HOLDINGS SACRAMENTO, LLC, Landlord and AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY, L.L.C. (formerly known as FORD GRAPHICS GROUP, L.L.C.) Tenant. * | |
31.1
|
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. * | |
31.2
|
Certification by the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. * | |
32.1
|
Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. * |
* | Filed herewith |
26
Table of Contents
SIGNATURE PAGE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on
November 14, 2005.
AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY | ||||||
By: | /s/ Sathiyamurthy Chandramohan | |||||
Chairman of the Board of Directors and | ||||||
Chief Executive Officer | ||||||
By: | /s/ Mark W. Legg | |||||
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
27