ARC DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS, INC. - Quarter Report: 2011 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-32407
AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
Delaware | 20-1700361 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
1981 N. Broadway, Suite 385
Walnut Creek, California 94596
(925) 949-5100
Walnut Creek, California 94596
(925) 949-5100
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrants principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ
As of November 2, 2011, there were 46,235,743 shares of the issuers common stock outstanding.
AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY
Form 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2011
Table of Contents
2
Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Form 10-Q contains statements that are forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in this Form
10-Q, the words believe, expect, anticipate, estimate, intend, plan, targets,
likely, will, would, could, and variations of such words and similar expressions as they
relate to our management or to American Reprographics Company (the Company) are intended to
identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated herein.
We have described in Part II, Item 1A-Risk Factors a number of factors that could cause our
actual results to differ from our projections or estimates. These factors and other risk factors
described in this Form 10-Q are not necessarily all of the important factors that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any of our forward-looking statements.
Other unknown or unpredictable factors also could harm our results. Consequently, there can be no
assurance that the actual results or developments anticipated by us will be realized or, even if
substantially realized, that they will have the expected consequences to, or effects on, us. Given
these uncertainties, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking
statements.
Except where otherwise indicated, the statements made in this Form 10-Q are made as of the date we
filed this report with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and should not
be relied upon as of any subsequent date. All future written and verbal forward-looking statements
attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by
the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. We undertake no obligation, and
specifically disclaim any obligation, to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements,
whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You should, however, consult
further disclosures we make in future filings of our Forms 10-K, Forms 10-Q, and Forms 8-K, and any
amendments thereto, as well as our proxy statements.
3
Table of Contents
PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) (Unaudited) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 25,954 | $ | 26,293 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for accounts
receivable of $3,578 and $4,030 |
60,956 | 52,619 | ||||||
Inventories, net |
10,880 | 10,689 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 7,157 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses |
4,589 | 4,074 | ||||||
Other current assets |
19,609 | 6,870 | ||||||
Total current assets |
121,988 | 107,702 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of
$188,086 and $211,875 |
55,407 | 59,036 | ||||||
Goodwill |
229,315 | 294,759 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, net |
49,701 | 62,643 | ||||||
Deferred financing costs, net |
4,561 | 4,995 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
1,347 | 37,835 | ||||||
Other assets |
2,120 | 2,115 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 464,439 | $ | 569,085 | ||||
Liabilities and Equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 22,931 | $ | 23,593 | ||||
Accrued payroll and payroll-related expenses |
9,759 | 7,980 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
24,983 | 30,134 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases |
26,648 | 23,608 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
84,321 | 85,315 | ||||||
Long-term debt and capital leases |
211,954 | 216,016 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
26,070 | | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
3,073 | 5,072 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
325,418 | 306,403 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6) |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
American Reprographics Company stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 25,000 shares authorized;
0 and 0 shares issued and outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 150,000 shares authorized;
46,236 and 46,183 shares issued, and 46,236 and 45,736 shares
outstanding |
46 | 46 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
99,698 | 96,251 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
35,720 | 173,459 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(2,722 | ) | (5,541 | ) | ||||
132,742 | 264,215 | |||||||
Less cost of common stock in treasury, 0 and 447 shares |
| 7,709 | ||||||
Total American Reprographics Company stockholders equity |
132,742 | 256,506 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest |
6,279 | 6,176 | ||||||
Total equity |
139,021 | 262,682 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 464,439 | $ | 569,085 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) (Unaudited) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Reprographics services |
$ | 65,529 | $ | 72,709 | $ | 206,011 | $ | 227,419 | ||||||||
Facilities management |
25,505 | 22,602 | 75,304 | 67,632 | ||||||||||||
Equipment and supplies sales |
13,758 | 14,110 | 39,571 | 41,619 | ||||||||||||
Total net sales |
104,792 | 109,421 | 320,886 | 336,670 | ||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
70,868 | 74,403 | 217,881 | 225,346 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
33,924 | 35,018 | 103,005 | 111,324 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
23,533 | 26,612 | 78,169 | 81,912 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
4,654 | 2,466 | 14,119 | 7,659 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
42,109 | 38,263 | 65,444 | 38,263 | ||||||||||||
Loss from operations |
(36,372 | ) | (32,323 | ) | (54,727 | ) | (16,510 | ) | ||||||||
Other income |
(27 | ) | (52 | ) | (88 | ) | (129 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense, net |
7,743 | 5,614 | 23,609 | 17,256 | ||||||||||||
Loss before income tax
(benefit) provision |
(44,088 | ) | (37,885 | ) | (78,248 | ) | (33,637 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax (benefit) provision |
(2,392 | ) | (12,668 | ) | 51,872 | (10,862 | ) | |||||||||
Net loss |
(41,696 | ) | (25,217 | ) | (130,120 | ) | (22,775 | ) | ||||||||
(Income) loss attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
(61 | ) | 73 | 90 | 27 | |||||||||||
Net loss attributable to
American Reprographics
Company |
$ | (41,757 | ) | $ | (25,144 | ) | $ | (130,030 | ) | $ | (22,748 | ) | ||||
Loss per share attributable to
American Reprographics Company
shareholders: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.92 | ) | $ | (0.56 | ) | $ | (2.87 | ) | $ | (0.50 | ) | ||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.92 | ) | $ | (0.56 | ) | $ | (2.87 | ) | $ | (0.50 | ) | ||||
Weighted average common shares
outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
45,416 | 45,224 | 45,366 | 45,191 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
45,416 | 45,224 | 45,366 | 45,191 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
American Reprographics Company Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Additional | Other | Common | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Par | Paid-in | Retained | Comprehensive | Stock in | Noncontrolling | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) (Unaudited) | Shares | Value | Capital | Earnings | Loss | Treasury | Interest | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
45,665 | $ | 46 | $ | 89,982 | $ | 200,961 | $ | (7,273 | ) | $ | (7,709 | ) | $ | 6,017 | $ | 282,024 | |||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
29 | | 4,371 | | | | | 4,371 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock
under Employee Stock Purchase
Plan |
7 | | 51 | | | | | 51 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised |
23 | | 125 | | | | | 125 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from stock-based
compensation |
| | 21 | | | | | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | (22,748 | ) | | | (27 | ) | (22,775 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency
translation adjustments |
| | | | 314 | | 159 | 473 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss on derivative, net
of tax effect |
| | | | (119 | ) | | | (119 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss: |
(22,421 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
45,724 | $ | 46 | $ | 94,550 | $ | 178,213 | $ | (7,078 | ) | $ | (7,709 | ) | $ | 6,149 | $ | 264,171 | |||||||||||||||
American Reprographics Company Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Additional | Other | Common | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Par | Paid-in | Retained | Comprehensive | Stock in | Noncontrolling | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) (Unaudited) | Shares | Value | Capital | Earnings | Loss | Treasury | Interest | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
45,736 | $ | 46 | $ | 96,251 | $ | 173,459 | $ | (5,541 | ) | $ | (7,709 | ) | $ | 6,176 | $ | 262,682 | |||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
475 | | 3,775 | | | | | 3,775 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock
under Employee Stock Purchase
Plan |
8 | | 33 | | | | | 33 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised |
17 | | 108 | | | | | 108 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax deficiency from
stock-based compensation, net
of tax benefit |
| | (469 | ) | | | | | (469 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement of 447 treasury
shares |
| | | (7,709 | ) | | 7,709 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | (130,030 | ) | | | (90 | ) | (130,120 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency
translation adjustments |
| | | | 82 | | 193 | 275 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of
derivative, net of tax
effect |
| | | | 2,737 | | | 2,737 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss: |
(127,108 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2011 |
46,236 | $ | 46 | $ | 99,698 | $ | 35,720 | $ | (2,722 | ) | $ | | $ | 6,279 | $ | 139,021 | ||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) (Unaudited) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (41,696 | ) | $ | (25,217 | ) | $ | (130,120 | ) | $ | (22,775 | ) | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||
Allowance for accounts receivable |
329 | 281 | 746 | 598 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation |
7,057 | 8,291 | 22,244 | 25,862 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
4,654 | 2,466 | 14,119 | 7,659 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
225 | 389 | 662 | 1,159 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of bond discount |
140 | | 407 | | ||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
42,109 | 38,263 | 65,444 | 38,263 | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
517 | 1,453 | 3,775 | 4,371 | ||||||||||||
Excess tax benefit related to stock-based compensation |
| | (31 | ) | (38 | ) | ||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(5,009 | ) | (9,914 | ) | 3,506 | (9,750 | ) | |||||||||
Deferred tax valuation allowance |
1,379 | | 65,719 | | ||||||||||||
Amortization of derivative, net of tax effect |
871 | | 2,737 | | ||||||||||||
Other non-cash items, net |
(463 | ) | 416 | (640 | ) | 102 | ||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect
of business acquisitions: |
||||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
206 | 751 | (8,499 | ) | (5,033 | ) | ||||||||||
Inventory |
1,084 | 829 | 36 | (456 | ) | |||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
942 | (3,582 | ) | (13,105 | ) | (5,516 | ) | |||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
5,272 | (4,164 | ) | 2,490 | 3,562 | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
17,617 | 10,262 | 29,490 | 38,008 | ||||||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(4,316 | ) | (2,919 | ) | (11,938 | ) | (5,696 | ) | ||||||||
Payments for businesses acquired, net of cash acquired and
including other cash payments associated with the acquisitions |
| (500 | ) | | (500 | ) | ||||||||||
Payment for swap transaction |
| | (9,729 | ) | | |||||||||||
Other |
278 | (91 | ) | 925 | 754 | |||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(4,038 | ) | (3,510 | ) | (20,742 | ) | (5,442 | ) | ||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
| | 108 | 125 | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under Employee Stock
Purchase Plan |
8 | 21 | 31 | 37 | ||||||||||||
Excess tax benefit related to stock-based compensation |
| | 31 | 38 | ||||||||||||
Payments on long-term debt agreements and capital leases |
(5,618 | ) | (10,607 | ) | (19,719 | ) | (32,203 | ) | ||||||||
Net (repayments) borrowings under revolving credit facilities |
(3,798 | ) | (327 | ) | 10,822 | (450 | ) | |||||||||
Payment of loan fees |
(127 | ) | | (668 | ) | | ||||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(9,535 | ) | (10,913 | ) | (9,395 | ) | (32,453 | ) | ||||||||
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash balances |
3 | 243 | 308 | 265 | ||||||||||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
4,047 | (3,918 | ) | (339 | ) | 378 | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
21,907 | 33,673 | 26,293 | 29,377 | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 25,954 | $ | 29,755 | $ | 25,954 | $ | 29,755 | ||||||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information |
||||||||||||||||
Noncash investing and financing activities |
||||||||||||||||
Noncash transactions include the following: |
||||||||||||||||
Capital lease obligations incurred |
$ | 2,023 | $ | 2,408 | $ | 7,476 | $ | 6,802 | ||||||||
Liabilities in connection with the acquisition of businesses |
$ | 1,371 | $ | | $ | 1,371 | $ | | ||||||||
Net gain (loss) on derivative, net of tax effect |
$ | | $ | 55 | $ | | $ | (119 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
1. Description of Business and Basis of Presentation
American Reprographics Company (ARC or the Company) is the largest reprographics company in the
United States providing business-to-business document management services primarily to the
architectural, engineering and construction (AEC) industry. ARC also provides these services to
companies in non-AEC industries, such as aerospace, technology, financial services, retail,
entertainment, and food and hospitality, that require sophisticated document management services.
The Company conducts its operations through its wholly-owned operating subsidiary, American
Reprographics Company, L.L.C., a California limited liability company, and its subsidiaries.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim
financial information and in conformity with the requirements of the SEC. As permitted under those
rules, certain footnotes or other financial information required by GAAP for complete financial
statements have been condensed or omitted. In managements opinion, the accompanying interim
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements presented reflect all adjustments of a normal and
recurring nature that are necessary to fairly present the interim Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation. The operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 are not
necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the interim Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements and accompanying notes. The Company evaluates its estimates and assumptions on
an ongoing basis and relies on historical experience and various other factors that it believes to
be reasonable under the circumstances to determine such estimates. Actual results could differ from
those estimates and such differences may be material to the interim Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
The Company reclassified certain amounts in the prior year financial statements to conform to the
current presentation. This reclassification had no effect on the Condensed Consolidated Statement
of Operations, as previously reported. The Company reclassified $4,074 from prepaid expenses and
other current assets at December 31, 2010 to a separate prepaid expenses caption in order to
conform to the current presentation.
These interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and notes should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Companys 2010 Form 10-K.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update (ASU) 2010-29. The amendments in this update affect any public entity as defined by ASC
805, Business Combinations, that enters into business combinations that are material on an
individual or aggregate basis. The objective in this update is to address diversity in practice
about the interpretation of the pro forma revenue and earnings disclosure requirements for business
combinations. ASU 2010-29 is effective prospectively for business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after December 15, 2010. The Company adopted provisions of ASU 2010-29 effective January 1, 2011,
which did not have a material effect on its Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company has not
had any material business combinations in 2011.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-28. This update provides amendments to the criteria of
ASC 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other. The amendments to this update affect all entities that
have recognized goodwill and have one or more reporting units whose carrying amount for purposes of
performing step one of the goodwill impairment test is zero or negative. ASU 2010-28 is effective
for financial statements issued for years beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not
permitted. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2010-28 effective January 1, 2011, which did
not have a material effect on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-13. This update provides amendments to the criteria of
ASC 605, Revenue Recognition, for separating consideration in multiple-deliverable arrangements.
The amendments to this update establish a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price
of a deliverable. ASU 2009-13 is effective for financial statements issued for years beginning on
or after June 15, 2010. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2010-06 effective January 1,
2011, which did not have a material effect on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
8
Table of Contents
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08. The new guidance provides an entity the option,
when testing for goodwill impairment, to
first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the
fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, after performing a qualitative
assessment, an entity determines it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit
is less than its carrying amount, it is required to perform the currently prescribed two-step
goodwill impairment test to identify potential goodwill impairment, and measure the amount of
goodwill impairment loss to be recognized for that reporting unit (if any). The new guidance will
be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2012.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05. The new guidance eliminates the current option to report
other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in equity. Instead, an
entity will be required to present either a continuous statement of net income and other
comprehensive income or present net income and other comprehensive income in two separate but
consecutive statements. The new guidance will be effective for the Company beginning January 1,
2012 and will have presentation changes only.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04 which amends the accounting and disclosure requirements on
fair value measurements. The new guidance limits the highest-and-best-use measure to nonfinancial
assets, permits certain financial assets and liabilities with offsetting positions in market or
counterparty credit risks to be measured at a net basis, and provides guidance on the applicability
of premiums and discounts. Additionally, the new guidance expands the disclosures on Level 3 inputs
by requiring quantitative disclosure of the unobservable inputs and assumptions, as well as
description of the valuation processes and the sensitivity of the fair value to changes in
unobservable inputs. The new guidance will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2012.
Other than requiring additional disclosures, the Company does not anticipate material impacts to
its Consolidated Financial Statements upon adoption.
Segment Reporting
The provisions of ASC 280, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,
require public companies to report financial and descriptive information about their reportable
operating segments. The Company identifies operating segments based on the various business
activities that earn revenue and incur expense, whose operating results are reviewed by the chief
operating decision maker. Based on the fact that operating segments have similar products and
services, classes of customers, production processes and performance objectives, the Company is
deemed to operate as a single reportable segment.
Risk and Uncertainties
The Company generates the majority of its revenue from sales of products and services provided to
the AEC industry. As a result, the Companys operating results and financial condition can be
significantly affected by economic factors that influence the AEC industry, such as non-residential
and residential construction spending, GDP growth, interest rates, unemployment rates, office
vacancy rates, and government expenditures. The effects of the recent recession and current
economic environment in the United States have resulted in a significant downturn in the
non-residential and residential portions of the AEC industry. The AEC industry generally
experiences a downturn several months after a downturn in the general economy and there may be a
similar delay in the recovery of the AEC industry following a recovery in the general economy.
Similar to the AEC industry, the reprographics industry typically lags a recovery in the broader
economy. A prolonged downturn in the AEC industry and the reprographics industry would continue to
diminish demand for ARCs products and services, and would therefore negatively impact revenues and
have a material adverse impact on its business, operating results and financial condition.
2. Earnings per Share
The Company accounts for earnings per share in accordance with ASC 260, formerly SFAS No. 128,
Earnings per Share. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to ARC
by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per
share is computed similar to basic earnings per share except that the denominator is increased to
include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if common shares
subject to outstanding options and acquisition rights had been issued and if the additional common
shares were dilutive. Common stock equivalents are excluded from the computation if their effect is
anti-dilutive. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, stock options for
2.2 million common shares were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income attributable to
ARC per common share because they were anti-dilutive.
9
Table of Contents
Basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and
2010 were calculated using the following common shares:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average
common shares
outstanding basic |
45,416 | 45,224 | 45,366 | 45,191 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive
impact on
equity-based
compensation awards |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Weighted average
common shares
outstanding
diluted |
45,416 | 45,224 | 45,366 | 45,191 | ||||||||||||
3. Goodwill and Other Intangibles Resulting from Business Acquisitions
Goodwill
In connection with acquisitions, the Company applies the provisions of ASC 805, using the
acquisition method of accounting. The excess purchase price over the fair value of net tangible
assets and identifiable intangible assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.
The Company assesses goodwill for impairment annually as of September 30, and more frequently if
events and circumstances indicate that goodwill might be impaired.
At September 30, 2011, the Company performed its annual goodwill impairment analysis, which
indicated that nine of its 37 reporting units, eight in the United States and one in Canada, had a
goodwill impairment as of September 30, 2011. Accordingly, the Company recorded a pretax, non-cash
charge for the three months ended September 30, 2011 to reduce the carrying value of goodwill by
$42.1 million. Given the increased uncertainty in the timing of the recovery of the construction industry, and the increased uncertainty in the economy as a whole, as well as the significant decline in the price of the Companys senior notes (resulting
in a higher yield) and a decline of the Companys stock price during the third quarter, the Company concluded that it was appropriate to increase the estimated weighted average cost of
capital (WACC) of its reporting units as of September 30, 2011. The increase in the Companys WACC was the main driver in the decrease in the estimated fair value of reporting units
during the third quarter of 2011, which in turn resulted in the goodwill impairment.
At June 30, 2011, the Company determined that there were sufficient indicators to trigger an
interim goodwill impairment analysis. The indicators included, among other factors: (1) the
economic environment, (2) the performance against plan of reporting units which previously had
goodwill impairment, and (3) revised forecasted future earnings. The Companys analysis indicated
that six of its 36 reporting units, all of which are located in the United States, had a goodwill
impairment as of June 30, 2011. Accordingly, the Company recorded a pretax, non-cash charge for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2011 to reduce the carrying value of goodwill by $23.3 million.
Goodwill impairment testing is performed at the reporting unit level. Goodwill is assigned to
reporting units at the date the goodwill is initially recorded. Once goodwill has been assigned to
reporting units, it no longer retains its association with a particular acquisition, and all of the
activities within a reporting unit, whether acquired or internally generated, are available to
support the value of the goodwill.
Goodwill impairment testing is a two-step process. Step one involves comparing the fair value of
the reporting units to its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit is greater
than zero and its fair value is greater than its carrying amount, there is no impairment. If the
reporting units carrying amount is greater than the fair value, the second step must be completed
to measure the amount of impairment, if any. Step two involves calculating the implied fair value
of goodwill by deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible assets, excluding goodwill,
of the reporting unit from the fair value of the reporting unit as determined in step one. The
implied fair value of goodwill determined in this step is compared to the carrying value of
goodwill. If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying value of goodwill, an
impairment loss is recognized equal to the difference.
The Company determines the fair value of its reporting units using an income approach. Under the
income approach, the Company determined fair value based on estimated discounted future cash flows
of each reporting unit. The cash flows are discounted by an estimated weighted-average cost of
capital, which is intended to reflect the overall level of inherent risk of a reporting unit.
Determining the fair value of a reporting unit is judgmental in nature and requires the use of
significant estimates and assumptions, including revenue growth rates and EBITDA margins, discount
rates and future market conditions, among others. The Company considered market information in
assessing the reasonableness of the fair value under the income approach outlined above.
Given the current economic environment and the uncertainties regarding the impact on the Companys
business, there can be no assurance that the estimates and assumptions made for purposes of the
Companys goodwill impairment testing as of September 30, 2011 regarding the duration of the lack
of significant new construction activity in the AEC industry, or the timing or strength of general
economic recovery, will prove to be accurate predictions of the future. If the Companys
assumptions regarding forecasted EBITDA of certain reporting units are not achieved, the Company
may be required to record additional goodwill impairment charges in future periods, whether in
connection with the Companys next annual impairment testing in the third quarter of 2012, or on an
interim basis, if any such change constitutes a triggering event (as defined under ASC 805) outside
of the quarter when the Company regularly performs its annual goodwill impairment test. It is not
possible at this time to determine if any such future impairment charge would result or, if it
does, whether such charge would be material.
10
Table of Contents
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill from January 1, 2010 through September 30, 2011 are
summarized as follows:
Accumulated | Net | |||||||||||
Gross | Impairment | Carrying | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | Goodwill | Loss | Amount | |||||||||
January 1, 2010 |
$ | 405,054 | $ | 72,536 | $ | 332,518 | ||||||
Additions |
500 | | 500 | |||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
| 38,263 | (38,263 | ) | ||||||||
Translation adjustment |
4 | | 4 | |||||||||
December 31, 2010 |
405,558 | 110,799 | 294,759 | |||||||||
Additions |
| | | |||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
| 65,444 | (65,444 | ) | ||||||||
September 30, 2011 |
$ | 405,558 | $ | 176,243 | $ | 229,315 | ||||||
The additions to goodwill include the excess purchase price over fair value of net assets acquired,
purchase price adjustments, and certain earnout payments.
See Critical Accounting Policies in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations for further information regarding the process and assumptions used in the
goodwill impairment analysis.
Long-lived Assets
The Company periodically assesses potential impairments of its long-lived assets in accordance with
the provisions of ASC 360, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets. An
impairment review is performed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. The Company groups its assets at the lowest
level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of the other
assets and liabilities. The Company has determined that the lowest level for which identifiable
cash flows are available is the divisional level.
Factors considered by the Company include, but are not limited to, significant underperformance
relative to historical or projected operating results; significant changes in the manner of use of
the acquired assets or the strategy for the overall business; and significant negative industry or
economic trends. When the carrying value of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable based upon
the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, the Company estimates the
future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual
disposition. If the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows and eventual disposition is
less than the carrying amount of the asset, the Company recognizes an impairment loss. An
impairment loss is reflected as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the
fair value of the asset, based on the fair value if available, or discounted cash flows, if fair
value is not available.
The reporting units of the Company have been negatively impacted by the decline in commercial and
residential construction. Before assessing the Companys goodwill for impairment, the Company
evaluated, as described above, the long-lived assets in its reporting units for impairment. Based
on these assessments in 2011, there was no impairment as of September 30, 2011.
Other intangible assets that have finite lives are amortized over their useful lives. Customer
relationships are amortized using the accelerated method, based on customer attrition rates, over
their estimated useful lives of 13 (weighted average) years.
During the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company decided to consolidate the various brands that
previously represented the Companys market presence around the country. Beginning in January 2011,
each of the Companys operating segments and their respective locations began to adopt ARC, the
Companys overall brand name. Original brand names will be used in conjunction with the new ARC
brand name to reinforce the Companys continuing presence in the business communities it serves,
and ongoing relationships with its customers. Accordingly, the remaining estimated useful lives of
the trade name intangible assets were revised down to 18 months. This change in estimate is
accounted for on a prospective basis, resulting in increased amortization expense over the revised
useful life of each trade name. The impact of this change in the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2011 was an increase in amortization expense of approximately $2.4 million and $7.1
million, respectively. Trade names are amortized using the straight-line method. The latest the
Company expects to fully retire original trade names is April 2012.
Non-competition agreements are amortized over their term on a straight-line basis.
11
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth the Companys other intangible assets resulting from business
acquisitions as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 which continue to be amortized:
September 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Net | Gross | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Amount | Amortization | Amount | Amount | Amortization | Amount | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortizable other intangible
assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Customer relationships |
$ | 97,474 | $ | 54,495 | $ | 42,979 | $ | 96,359 | $ | 48,301 | $ | 48,058 | ||||||||||||
Trade names and trademarks |
20,317 | 13,607 | 6,710 | 20,294 | 5,736 | 14,558 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-competition agreements |
100 | 88 | 12 | 100 | 73 | 27 | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 117,891 | $ | 68,190 | $ | 49,701 | $ | 116,753 | $ | 54,110 | $ | 62,643 | |||||||||||||
Based on current information, estimated future amortization expense of amortizable intangible
assets for the remainder of the 2011 fiscal year, each of the subsequent four fiscal years and
thereafter are as follows:
(In thousands) | ||||
2011 |
$ | 4,618 | ||
2012 |
10,957 | |||
2013 |
6,536 | |||
2014 |
5,701 | |||
2015 |
5,168 | |||
Thereafter |
16,721 | |||
$ | 49,701 | |||
4. Income Taxes
On a quarterly basis, the Company estimates its effective tax rate for the full fiscal year and
records a quarterly income tax provision based on the anticipated rate in conjunction with the
recognition of any discrete items within the quarter.
The Company recorded an income tax benefit of $2.4 million in relation to a pretax loss of $44.1
million, and an income tax provision of $51.9 million in relation to a pretax loss of $78.2 million
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. For the three months ended
September 30, 2011, the low income tax benefit was primarily due to the impact of a stock basis
goodwill impairment charge of $27.1 million, which is nondeductible for U.S. income tax purposes, and an additional valuation allowance of $1.4 million recorded against certain deferred tax
assets recognized in the same period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the income tax
provision of $51.9 million is primarily due to the establishment of a $65.7 million non-cash
valuation allowance against certain of the Companys deferred tax assets as discussed below.
During the first quarter of 2011, the audit of the Companys 2008 federal income tax return by the
Internal Revenue Service was finalized and resulted in no adjustments. Due to this final result and
other pertinent factors, the Company derecognized its liability for an uncertain tax position of
$1.5 million and related accrued interest of $0.1 million.
In accordance with ASC 740-10, Income Taxes, the Company evaluates its deferred tax assets to
determine if a valuation allowance is required based on the consideration of all available evidence
using a more likely than not standard, with significant weight being given to evidence that can
be objectively verified. This assessment considers, among other matters, the nature, frequency and
severity of current and cumulative losses, forecasts of future profitability; the length of
statutory carryforward periods for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards; and available tax
planning alternatives. As of September 30, 2011, the Company determined that cumulative losses for
the preceding twelve quarters constituted sufficient objective evidence (as defined by ASC 740-10)
that a valuation allowance was needed, and therefore established a $65.7 million valuation
allowance against certain of its deferred tax assets.
Based on the Companys assessment, the remaining net deferred tax assets of $1.3 million as of
September 30, 2011 are considered to be more likely than not to be realized. The valuation
allowance of $65.7 million may be increased or decreased as conditions change or if the Company is
unable to implement certain available tax planning strategies. The realization of the Companys net
deferred tax assets ultimately depend on future taxable income, reversals of existing taxable
temporary differences or through a loss carry back. The Company has income tax receivables of $16.4
million as of September 30, 2011 included in other current assets in its consolidated balance sheet
primarily relating to 2010 losses that were be carried back to 2008.
12
Table of Contents
5. Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(In thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Borrowings from foreign revolving credit facility; 6.0% interest rate
at September 30, 2011 |
$ | 1,022 | $ | | ||||
Borrowings from a domestic revolving credit facility; 2.3% interest
rate at September 30, 2011 |
9,800 | | ||||||
10.5% senior notes due 2016, net of bond discount of $3,902 and $4,308 |
196,098 | 195,692 | ||||||
Various subordinated notes payable; weighted average interest rate of
6.1% and 6.2%; principal and interest payable monthly through
September 2014 |
2,620 | 8,635 | ||||||
Various capital leases; weighted average interest rate of 8.5% and
8.8%; principal and interest payable monthly through November 2016 |
29,062 | 35,297 | ||||||
238,602 | 239,624 | |||||||
Less current portion |
(26,648 | ) | (23,608 | ) | ||||
$ | 211,954 | $ | 216,016 | |||||
10.5% Senior Notes due 2016
On December 1, 2010, the Company completed a private placement of 10.5% senior unsecured notes due
2016 (the Notes).
The Notes have an aggregate principal amount of $200 million. The Notes are general unsecured
senior obligations of the Company and are subordinate to all existing and future senior secured
debt of the Company to the extent of the assets securing such debt. The Companys obligations under
the Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed by all of the Companys domestic subsidiaries. The
issue price was 97.824% with a yield to maturity of 11.0%. Interest on the Notes accrues at a rate
of 10.5% per annum and is payable semiannually in arrears on June 15 and December 15 of each year,
commencing on June 15, 2011. The Company will make each interest payment to the holders of record
of the Notes on the immediately preceding June 1 and December 1.
The Company received gross proceeds of $195.6 million from the Notes offering. In connection with
the issuance of the Notes, the Company entered into an indenture (the Indenture). The Notes were
offered only to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and outside the United States to non-U.S. persons pursuant
to Regulation S under the Securities Act.
Optional Redemption. At any time prior to December 15, 2013, the Company may redeem all or part of
the Notes upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days prior notice at a redemption price equal to
the sum of (i) 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus (ii) a make-whole premium as of the date
of redemption, plus (iii) accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption. In
addition, the Company may redeem some or all of the Notes on or after December 15, 2013, at
redemption prices set forth in the Indenture, together with accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to
the date of redemption. At any time prior to December 15, 2013, the Company may use the proceeds of
certain equity offerings to redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes,
including any permitted additional notes, at a redemption price equal to 110.5% of the principal
amount of the Notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption.
Repurchase upon Change of Control. Upon the occurrence of a change in control (as defined in the
Indenture), each holder of the Notes may require the Company to repurchase all of the
then-outstanding Notes in cash at a price equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount of the
Notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of repurchase.
Other Covenants. The Indenture contains covenants that limit, among other things, the Companys and
certain of its subsidiaries ability to (1) incur certain additional debt and issue preferred
stock, (2) make certain restricted payments, (3) consummate specified asset sales, (4) enter into
certain transactions with affiliates, (5) create liens, (6) declare or pay any dividend or make any
other distributions, (7) make certain investments, and (8) merge or consolidate with another
person.
Events of Default. The Indenture provides for customary events of default (subject in certain cases
to customary grace and cure periods), which include non-payment, breach of covenants in the
Indenture, cross default and acceleration of other indebtedness, a failure to pay certain judgments
and certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency. Generally, if an event of default occurs, the
Trustee or holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the then outstanding Notes may declare
the principal of and accrued but unpaid interest on all of the then-outstanding Notes to be due and
payable.
Exchange Offer. Pursuant to a registered exchange offer in May 2011, the Company offered to
exchange up to $200 million aggregate principal amount of the Notes, for new notes that were
registered under the Securities Act. The terms of the registered notes are the same as the terms of
the Notes, except that they are registered under the Securities Act and the transfer restrictions,
registration rights and additional interest provisions are not applicable. The Company accepted the
exchange of $200 million aggregate principal amounts of the Notes that were properly tendered in
the exchange offer.
13
Table of Contents
2010 Credit Agreement
In connection with the issuance of the Notes, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries also
entered into a $50 million credit agreement (the 2010 Credit Agreement) and paid off in full
amounts outstanding under its prior credit agreement.
The 2010 Credit Agreement provides for a $50 million senior secured revolving line of credit, of
which up to $20 million is available for the issuance of letters of credit. The line of credit is
available on a revolving basis until December 1, 2015 and is secured by substantially all of the
assets of the Company and certain of its subsidiaries. Advances under the revolving line of credit
are subject to customary borrowing conditions, including the accuracy of representations and
warranties and the absence of events of default. The Company may borrow, partially or wholly repay
its outstanding borrowings and reborrow, subject to the terms of the 2010 Credit Agreement.
The Companys obligations under the 2010 Credit Agreement are guaranteed by its domestic
subsidiaries and, subject to certain exceptions, are secured by security interests granted in all
of the Companys and the domestic subsidiaries personal and real property.
Advances under the 2010 Credit Agreement bear interest at LIBOR plus the applicable rate. The
applicable rate is determined based upon the consolidated leverage ratio for the Company with a
minimum and maximum applicable rate of 1.50% and 2.00%, respectively. The initial applicable rate
is 2.00%. During the continuation of certain events of default, all amounts due under the 2010
Credit Agreement bear interest at 4.0% above the rate otherwise applicable. In addition, the
Company is required to pay an unused commitment fee on the average daily unused amount of the line
of credit at the applicable rate, calculated and payable quarterly in arrears, as follows: if the
consolidated leverage ratio is (i) greater than or equal to 3.00x, the unused commitment fee is
0.20%, (ii) less than or equal to 2.99x but greater than or equal to 2.00x, 0.15%, and (iii) less
than 2.00x, 0.10%.
The 2010 Credit Agreement contains the following financial covenants:
| Maximum consolidated leverage ratio as follows: |
| 4.35:1.00 for quarters ending December 31, 2010 through
September 30, 2011 |
||
| 4.25:1.00 for quarters ending December 31, 2011 through
September 30, 2012 |
||
| 4.15:1.00 for quarters ending December 31, 2012 through
September 30, 2013 |
||
| 4.00:1.00 for quarters ending December 31, 2013 through maturity; |
| Maximum consolidated senior secured debt leverage ratio not
greater than 1.50:1.00, determined on the last day of each
fiscal quarter through maturity; |
||
| Minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio as follows: |
| 1.70:1.00 for quarters ending December 31, 2010 through
September 30, 2011 |
||
| 1.75:1.00 for quarters ending December 31, 2011 through maturity; |
The 2010 Credit Agreement also contains covenants which, subject to certain exceptions, restrict
the Companys ability to incur additional debt, grant liens or guaranty other indebtedness, pay
dividends, redeem stock, pay or redeem subordinated indebtedness, make investments or capital
expenditures, dispose or acquire assets, dispose of equity interests in subsidiaries, enter into
any merger, sale of assets, consolidation or liquidation transaction, or engage in transactions
with stockholders and affiliates. Covenants in the 2010 Credit Agreement also require the Company
to provide periodic financial reports to the lender, observe certain practices and procedures with
respect to the collateral pledged as security, comply with applicable laws and maintain and
preserve the Company and its subsidiaries properties and insurance.
As of September 30, 2011, the Company was in compliance with the financial incurrence-based
covenants under the Notes and financial maintenance-based covenants under the 2010 Credit
Agreement. The Companys trailing twelve months key financial covenant ratios under the 2010 Credit
Agreement as of September 30, 2011 were 1.80:1.00 for minimum interest coverage, 3.68:1.00 for
maximum total leverage and 0.60:1.00 for maximum senior secured leverage.
The Company expects to be in compliance with the financial covenants in the 2010 Credit Agreement
through the term of the agreement. However, it is possible that a default under certain financial
covenants may occur in the future, should the minimum required profitability levels not be
achieved. If the Company defaults on the covenants under the 2010 Credit Agreement and is unable to
obtain waivers from its lenders, the
lenders will be able to exercise their rights and remedies under the 2010 Credit Agreement,
including a call provision on outstanding debt, which would have a material adverse effect on the
Companys business and financial condition.
14
Table of Contents
As of September 30, 2011, standby letters of credit totaling $3.9 million had been issued. The
standby letters of credit and borrowings under the 2010 Credit Agreement reduced the Companys
borrowing availability under its 2010 Credit Agreement to $36.3 million.
Foreign Credit Facility
In the second quarter of 2011, in conjunction with its Chinese operations, UNIS Document Solutions
Co. Ltd. (UDS) entered into a one-year revolving credit facility. This facility provides for a
maximum credit amount of 8.0 million Chinese Yuan Renminbi. This translates to U.S. $1.2 million as
of September 30, 2011. Draws on the facility are limited to 30 day periods and incur a fee of 0.5%
of the amount drawn and no additional interest is charged.
Interest Rate Swap Transaction
On December 19, 2007, the Company entered into an interest rate swap transaction in order to hedge
the floating interest rate risk on the Companys long term variable rate debt.
In connection with the issuance of the Notes, the swap transaction no longer qualified as a cash
flow hedge and was de-designated.
As of December 31, 2010, the swap transaction had a negative fair value of $9.7 million, all of
which was recorded in accrued expenses. On January 3, 2011, the swap transaction was terminated and
settled. For further information, see Note 9 Derivatives and Hedging Transactions.
6. Commitments and Contingencies
Operating Leases. The Company has entered into various non-cancelable operating leases primarily
related to facilities, equipment and vehicles used in the ordinary course of business.
Contingent Transaction Consideration. The Company is subject to earnout obligations entered into in
connection with prior acquisitions. If the acquired businesses generate sales and/or operating
profits in excess of predetermined targets, the Company is obligated to make additional cash
payments in accordance with the terms of such earnout obligations. As of September 30, 2011, the
Company has potential future earnout obligations for acquisitions consummated before the adoption
of ASC 805 of approximately $1.5 million through 2014 if predetermined financial targets are met or
exceeded, and earnout obligations of $0.3 million through 2014 consummated subsequent to the
adoption of ASC 805. Earnout payments prior to the adoption of ASC 805 are recorded as additional
purchase price (as goodwill) when the contingent payments are earned and become payable.
Legal Proceedings. On October 21, 2010, a former employee, individually and on behalf of a
purported class consisting of all non-exempt employees who work or worked for American
Reprographics Company, LLC and American Reprographics Company in the State of California at any
time from October 21, 2006 through October 21, 2010, filed an action against the Company in the
Superior Court of California for the County of Orange. The complaint alleges, among other things,
that the Company violated the California Labor Code by failing to (i) provide meal and rest
periods, or compensation in lieu thereof, (ii) timely pay wages due at termination, and (iii) that
those practices also violate the California Business and Professions Code. The relief sought
includes damages, restitution, penalties, interest, costs, and attorneys fees and such other
relief as the court deems proper. The Company has not included any liability in its Consolidated
Financial Statements in connection with this matter. The Company cannot reasonably estimate the
amount or range of possible loss, if any, at this time.
In addition to the matter described above, the Company is involved in various additional legal
proceedings and other legal matters from time to time in the normal course of business. The Company
does not believe that the outcome of any of these matters will have a material adverse effect on
its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
15
Table of Contents
7. Comprehensive Loss
The Companys comprehensive loss includes foreign currency translation adjustments and the
amortized fair value of the swap transaction, net of taxes. The swap transaction was de-designated
on December 1, 2010, as it no longer qualified as a cash flow hedge when the cash proceeds from the
issuance of the Notes were used to pay off the Companys previous credit agreement. At that time,
the fair value of the swap transaction was computed and the effective portion is recorded in other
comprehensive income and will be amortized into income, net of tax effect, on the straight-line
method, based on the original notional schedule.
The differences between net loss and comprehensive loss attributable to ARC for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (41,696 | ) | $ | (25,217 | ) | $ | (130,120 | ) | $ | (22,775 | ) | ||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
(308 | ) | 423 | 275 | 473 | |||||||||||
Gain (loss) on derivative, net of tax effect |
871 | 55 | 2,737 | (119 | ) | |||||||||||
Comprehensive loss |
(41,133 | ) | (24,739 | ) | (127,108 | ) | (22,421 | ) | ||||||||
Comprehensive income attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
(127 | ) | (86 | ) | (103 | ) | (132 | ) | ||||||||
Comprehensive loss attributable to American
Reprographics Company |
$ | (41,260 | ) | $ | (24,825 | ) | $ | (127,211 | ) | $ | (22,553 | ) | ||||
Asset and liability accounts of foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars, the Companys
functional currency, at current rates. Revenues and expenses are translated at the weighted-average
currency rate for the fiscal period.
8. Stock-Based Compensation
The Company adopted the American Reprographics Company 2005 Stock Plan (the Stock Plan) in
February 2005. The Stock Plan provides for the grant of incentive and non-statutory stock options,
stock appreciation rights, restricted stock purchase awards, restricted stock awards, and
restricted stock units to employees, directors and consultants of the Company. The Stock Plan
authorizes the Company to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of common stock. This amount automatically
increased annually on the first day of the Companys fiscal year, from 2006 through and including
2010, by the lesser of (i) 1.0% of the Companys outstanding shares on the date of the increase;
(ii) 300,000 shares; or (iii) such smaller number of shares determined by the Companys board of
directors. As of September 30, 2011, 2,308,903 shares remain available for issuance under the Stock
Plan.
Stock options granted under the Stock Plan generally expire no later than ten years from the date
of grant. Options generally vest and become fully exercisable over a period of two to five years,
except that options granted to non-employee directors may vest over a shorter time period. The
exercise price of options must be equal to at least 100% (110% in the case of an incentive stock
option granted to a 10% stockholder) of the fair market value of the Companys common stock on the
date of grant. The Company allows for cashless exercises of vested outstanding options.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Company granted options to acquire a total of
54,836 shares of the Companys common stock to certain key employees with an exercise price equal
to the fair market value of the Companys common stock on the respective dates of grant. In
addition, the Company granted 465,444 shares of restricted stock to certain key employees, and
5,587 shares of restricted stock to each of the Companys six non-employee members of its Board of
Directors at a price per share equal to the closing price of the Companys common stock on the
respective dates the restricted stock was granted.
The impact of stock-based compensation before income taxes on the interim Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations was $0.5 million and $1.5 million for the three months ended September 30,
2011 and 2010, respectively.
The impact of stock-based compensation before income taxes on the interim Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations was $3.8 million and $4.4 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2011 and 2010, respectively.
As of September 30, 2011, total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock-based
payments totaled $5.2 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of
3.3 years.
9. Derivatives and Hedging Transactions
As of September 30, 2011, the Company was not party to any derivative or hedging transactions.
16
Table of Contents
As of December 31, 2010, the Company was party to a swap transaction, in which the Company
exchanged its floating-rate payments for fixed-rate payments. As of December 1, 2010, the swap
transaction was de-designated upon issuance of the Notes and payoff of the Companys previous
credit agreement. The swap transaction no longer qualified as a cash flow hedge under ASC 815, as
all the floating-rate debt was extinguished. The swap transaction qualified as a cash flow hedge up
to November 30, 2010. On January 3, 2011, the Company terminated and settled the swap transaction.
As of September 30, 2011, $4.8 million is deferred in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (AOCL)
and will be recognized in earnings over the remainder of the original term of the swap transaction
which was scheduled to end in December 2012. Over the next 12 months, the Company will amortize
$4.4 million from AOCL to interest expense.
The following table summarizes the fair value and classification on the interim Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets of the swap transaction as of December 31, 2010:
Fair Value | ||||||||
Balance Sheet | December 31, | |||||||
(In thousands) | Classification | 2010 | ||||||
Derivative not designated as hedging instrument under ASC 815 |
||||||||
Swap transaction |
Accrued expenses | $ | 9,729 |
The following table summarizes the gain (loss) recognized in AOCL of derivatives, designated and
qualifying as cash flow hedges for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010:
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in AOCL on | ||||||||
Derivative | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||
(In thousands) | September 30, 2010 | September 30, 2010 | ||||||
Derivative in ASC 815 cash flow hedging relationship |
||||||||
Swap transaction |
$ | 92 | $ | (234 | ) | |||
Tax effect |
(37 | ) | 115 | |||||
Swap transaction, net of tax effect |
$ | 55 | $ | (119 | ) | |||
The following table summarizes the effect of the swap transaction on the interim Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and
2010:
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from AOCL into Income | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(effective portion) | (ineffective portion) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Location of Gain or
(Loss) Reclassified
from AOCL into
Income |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
$ | (1,389 | ) | $ | (1,841 | ) | $ | (4,369 | ) | $ | (5,775 | ) | $ | | $ | (44 | ) | $ | | $ | (150 | ) |
The following table summarizes the loss recognized in income of derivatives, not designated as
hedging instruments under ASC 815 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011:
Amount of Loss Recognized in Income on | ||||||||
Derivative | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||
(In thousands) | September 30, 2011 | September 30, 2011 | ||||||
Derivative not designated as hedging instrument under ASC 815 |
||||||||
Swap transaction |
$ | | $ | (120 | ) | |||
Tax effect |
| 45 | ||||||
Swap transaction, net of tax effect |
$ | | $ | (75 | ) | |||
17
Table of Contents
10. Fair Value Measurements
In accordance with ASC 820, the Company has categorized its assets and liabilities that are
measured at fair value into a three-level fair value hierarchy as set forth below. If the inputs
used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the categorization is
based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels
of the hierarchy are defined as follows:
Level 1inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for
identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar
assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for
the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the
full term of the financial instrument.
Level 3inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant
to the fair value measurement.
The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the Companys financial
assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of December
31, 2010. As required by ASC 820, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety
based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Companys
assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires
judgment, and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement
within the fair value hierarchy levels.
Significant Other | ||||
Observable Inputs | ||||
Level 2 | ||||
(In thousands) | December 31, 2010 | |||
Recurring Fair Value Measure |
||||
Swap transaction |
$ | 9,729 |
The Company has also included additional required disclosures about the Companys swap transaction
in Note 9 Derivatives and Hedging Transactions.
The swap transaction is valued at fair value with the use of an income approach based on current
market interest rates using a discounted cash flow model and an adjustment for counterparty risk.
This model reflects the contractual terms of the derivative instrument, including the time to
maturity and debt repayment schedule, and market-based parameters such as interest rates and yield
curves. This model does not require significant judgment, and the inputs are observable. Thus, the
derivative instrument is classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. The Company
terminated and settled the swap transaction on January 3, 2011.
The following table summarizes the bases used to measure certain assets and liabilities at fair
value on a nonrecurring basis in the consolidated financial statements as of and for the nine
months ended September 30, 2011:
Significant Other Unobservable Inputs | ||||||||
September 30, 2011 | ||||||||
(In thousands) | Level 3 | Total Losses | ||||||
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measure |
||||||||
Goodwill |
$ | 229,315 | $ | 65,444 |
In accordance with the provisions of ASC 350, goodwill was written down to its implied fair value
of $229.3 million as of September 30, 2011, resulting in an impairment charge of $65.4 million
during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. See Note 3, Goodwill and Other Intangibles
Resulting from Business Acquisitions for further information regarding the process of determining
the implied fair value of goodwill.
18
Table of Contents
Fair Values of Financial Instruments. The following methods and assumptions were used by the
Company in estimating the fair value of its financial instruments for disclosure purposes:
Cash equivalents: Cash equivalents are time deposits with maturity of three months or less
when purchased, which are highly liquid and readily convertible to cash. Cash equivalents
reported in the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets were $9.8 million as of September 30,
2011, and are carried at cost and approximate fair value, due to the relatively short period
to maturity of these instruments.
Short- and long-term debt: The carrying amount of the Companys capital leases reported in
the Consolidated Balance Sheets approximates fair value based on the Companys current
incremental borrowing rate for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The carrying amount
reported in the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2011 for its Notes
is $200.0 million and $2.6 million for its subordinated notes payable. Using a discounted
cash flow technique that incorporates a market interest rate which assumes adjustments for
duration, optionality, and risk profile, the Company has determined the fair value of its
Notes is $194.0 million as of September 30, 2011 and the fair value and for its subordinated
notes payable is $2.5 million as of September 30, 2011.
Interest rate hedge agreements: The fair value of the interest rate swap was based on market
interest rates using a discounted cash flow model and an adjustment for counterparty risk.
11. Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements
The Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a joint and several basis, by all of the
Companys domestic subsidiaries (the Guarantor Subsidiaries). The Companys foreign subsidiaries
have not guaranteed the Notes (the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries). Each of the Guarantor
Subsidiaries is 100% owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company. There are no significant
restrictions on the ability of the Company to obtain funds from any of the Guarantor Subsidiaries
by dividends or loan. In lieu of providing separate audited financial statements for the Guarantor
Subsidiaries, condensed consolidating financial information is presented below.
19
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
September 30, 2011
September 30, 2011
American | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reprographics | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) (Unaudited) | Company | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Total | |||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | | $ | 14,331 | $ | 11,623 | $ | | $ | 25,954 | ||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
| 53,564 | 7,392 | | 60,956 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany operations |
295 | 4,461 | (4,756 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||
Inventories, net |
| 7,841 | 3,039 | | 10,880 | |||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses |
13 | 3,073 | 1,503 | | 4,589 | |||||||||||||||
Other current assets |
| 18,529 | 1,080 | | 19,609 | |||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
308 | 101,799 | 19,881 | | 121,988 | |||||||||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
| 48,077 | 7,330 | | 55,407 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
| 229,315 | | | 229,315 | |||||||||||||||
Investment in subsidiaries |
151,207 | 12,604 | | (163,811 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Other intangible assets, net |
| 47,245 | 2,456 | | 49,701 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred financing costs, net |
4,561 | | | | 4,561 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| | 1,347 | | 1,347 | |||||||||||||||
Other assets |
| 1,864 | 256 | | 2,120 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 156,076 | $ | 440,904 | $ | 31,270 | $ | (163,811 | ) | $ | 464,439 | |||||||||
Liabilities and Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | | $ | 20,458 | $ | 2,473 | $ | | $ | 22,931 | ||||||||||
Accrued payroll and
payroll-related expenses |
| 9,397 | 362 | | 9,759 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses |
6,184 | 16,265 | 2,534 | | 24,983 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany loans |
(188,751 | ) | 186,975 | 1,776 | | | ||||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term
debt and capital leases |
9,800 | 14,954 | 1,894 | | 26,648 | |||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
(172,767 | ) | 248,049 | 9,039 | | 84,321 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt and capital leases |
196,101 | 14,233 | 1,620 | | 211,954 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 26,070 | | 26,070 | ||||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
| 1,345 | 1,728 | | 3,073 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
23,334 | 289,697 | 12,387 | | 325,418 | |||||||||||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total equity |
132,742 | 151,207 | 18,883 | (163,811 | ) | 139,021 | ||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and
equity |
$ | 156,076 | $ | 440,904 | $ | 31,270 | $ | (163,811 | ) | $ | 464,439 | |||||||||
20
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
December 31, 2010
December 31, 2010
American | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reprographics | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) (Unaudited) | Company | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Total | |||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | | $ | 12,587 | $ | 13,706 | $ | | $ | 26,293 | ||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
| 48,283 | 4,336 | | 52,619 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany operations |
295 | 2,717 | (3,012 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||
Inventories, net |
| 8,090 | 2,599 | | 10,689 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 7,157 | | | 7,157 | |||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses |
72 | 2,799 | 1,203 | | 4,074 | |||||||||||||||
Other current assets |
| 5,942 | 928 | | 6,870 | |||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
367 | 87,575 | 19,760 | | 107,702 | |||||||||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
| 52,376 | 6,660 | | 59,036 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
| 294,759 | | | 294,759 | |||||||||||||||
Investment in subsidiaries |
257,838 | 16,065 | | (273,903 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Other intangible assets, net |
| 60,585 | 2,058 | | 62,643 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred financing costs, net |
4,995 | | | | 4,995 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
708 | 34,453 | 2,674 | | 37,835 | |||||||||||||||
Other assets |
| 1,978 | 137 | | 2,115 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 263,908 | $ | 547,791 | $ | 31,289 | $ | (273,903 | ) | $ | 569,085 | |||||||||
Liabilities and Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | | $ | 21,137 | $ | 2,456 | $ | | $ | 23,593 | ||||||||||
Accrued payroll and
payroll-related expenses |
| 7,643 | 337 | | 7,980 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses |
2,210 | 25,563 | 2,361 | | 30,134 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany loans |
(190,500 | ) | 190,241 | 259 | | | ||||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term
debt and capital leases |
| 22,787 | 821 | | 23,608 | |||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
(188,290 | ) | 267,371 | 6,234 | | 85,315 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt and capital leases |
195,692 | 19,201 | 1,123 | | 216,016 | |||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
| 3,381 | 1,691 | | 5,072 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
7,402 | 289,953 | 9,048 | | 306,403 | |||||||||||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total equity |
256,506 | 257,838 | 22,241 | (273,903 | ) | 262,682 | ||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and
equity |
$ | 263,908 | $ | 547,791 | $ | 31,289 | $ | (273,903 | ) | $ | 569,085 | |||||||||
21
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2011
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2011
American | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reprographics | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) (Unaudited) | Company | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Total | |||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | | $ | 93,365 | $ | 11,427 | $ | | $ | 104,792 | ||||||||||
Cost of sales |
| 61,895 | 8,973 | | 70,868 | |||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
| 31,470 | 2,454 | | 33,924 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
| 21,513 | 2,020 | | 23,533 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible
assets |
| 4,581 | 73 | | 4,654 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
| 42,109 | | | 42,109 | |||||||||||||||
Loss from operations |
| (36,733 | ) | 361 | | (36,372 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other income |
| (27 | ) | | | (27 | ) | |||||||||||||
Interest expense (income), net |
5,788 | 1,999 | (44 | ) | | 7,743 | ||||||||||||||
(Loss) income before
equity earnings of
subsidiaries and income
tax benefit |
(5,788 | ) | (38,705 | ) | 405 | | (44,088 | ) | ||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of
subsidiaries |
36,675 | (527 | ) | | (36,148 | ) | | |||||||||||||
Income tax benefit |
(706 | ) | (1,503 | ) | (183 | ) | | (2,392 | ) | |||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
(41,757 | ) | (36,675 | ) | 588 | 36,148 | (41,696 | ) | ||||||||||||
Loss attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
| | (61 | ) | | (61 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net (loss) income
attributable to American
Reprographics Company |
$ | (41,757 | ) | $ | (36,675 | ) | $ | 527 | $ | 36,148 | $ | (41,757 | ) | |||||||
22
Table of Contents
Consolidating Condensed Statement of Operations
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2010
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2010
American | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reprographics | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) (Unaudited) | Company | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Total | |||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | | $ | 100,004 | $ | 9,417 | $ | | $ | 109,421 | ||||||||||
Cost of sales |
| 66,678 | 7,725 | | 74,403 | |||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
| 33,326 | 1,692 | | 35,018 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
| 24,764 | 1,848 | | 26,612 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible
assets |
| 2,394 | 72 | | 2,466 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
| 36,697 | 1,566 | | 38,263 | |||||||||||||||
Loss from operations |
| (30,529 | ) | (1,794 | ) | | (32,323 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other income |
| (52 | ) | | | (52 | ) | |||||||||||||
Interest expense (income), net |
| 5,621 | (7 | ) | | 5,614 | ||||||||||||||
Loss before equity
earnings of subsidiaries
and income tax benefit |
| (36,098 | ) | (1,787 | ) | | (37,885 | ) | ||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of
subsidiaries |
25,144 | 1,670 | | (26,814 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit |
| (12,624 | ) | (44 | ) | | (12,668 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
(25,144 | ) | (25,144 | ) | (1,743 | ) | 26,814 | (25,217 | ) | |||||||||||
Loss attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
| | 73 | | 73 | |||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income
attributable to American
Reprographics Company |
$ | (25,144 | ) | $ | (25,144 | ) | $ | (1,670 | ) | $ | 26,814 | $ | (25,144 | ) | ||||||
23
Table of Contents
Consolidating Condensed Statement of Operations
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2011
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2011
American | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reprographics | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) (Unaudited) | Company | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Total | |||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | | $ | 290,461 | $ | 30,425 | $ | | $ | 320,886 | ||||||||||
Cost of sales |
| 193,825 | 24,056 | | 217,881 | |||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
| 96,636 | 6,369 | | 103,005 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
| 72,086 | 6,083 | | 78,169 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible
assets |
| 13,914 | 205 | | 14,119 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
| 65,444 | | | 65,444 | |||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from
operations |
| (54,808 | ) | 81 | | (54,727 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other income |
| (88 | ) | | | (88 | ) | |||||||||||||
Interest expense (income), net |
17,130 | 6,555 | (76 | ) | | 23,609 | ||||||||||||||
(Loss) income before
equity earnings of
subsidiaries and income
tax provision |
(17,130 | ) | (61,275 | ) | 157 | | (78,248 | ) | ||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of
subsidiaries |
112,900 | 917 | | (113,817 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
| 50,708 | 1,164 | | 51,872 | |||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
(130,030 | ) | (112,900 | ) | (1,007 | ) | 113,817 | (130,120 | ) | |||||||||||
Loss attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
| | 90 | | 90 | |||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income
attributable to American
Reprographics Company |
$ | (130,030 | ) | $ | (112,900 | ) | $ | (917 | ) | $ | 113,817 | $ | (130,030 | ) | ||||||
24
Table of Contents
Consolidating Condensed Statement of Operations
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2010
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2010
American | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reprographics | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) (Unaudited) | Company | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Total | |||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | | $ | 310,596 | $ | 26,074 | $ | | $ | 336,670 | ||||||||||
Cost of sales |
| 204,840 | 20,506 | | 225,346 | |||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
| 105,756 | 5,568 | | 111,324 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
| 76,595 | 5,317 | | 81,912 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible
assets |
| 7,443 | 216 | | 7,659 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
| 36,697 | 1,566 | | 38,263 | |||||||||||||||
Loss from operations |
| (14,979 | ) | (1,531 | ) | | (16,510 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other income |
| (129 | ) | | | (129 | ) | |||||||||||||
Interest expense (income), net |
| 17,258 | (2 | ) | | 17,256 | ||||||||||||||
Loss before equity
earnings of subsidiaries
and income tax (benefit)
provision |
| (32,108 | ) | (1,529 | ) | | (33,637 | ) | ||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of
subsidiaries |
22,748 | 1,527 | | (24,275 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Income tax (benefit) provision |
| (10,887 | ) | 25 | | (10,862 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
(22,748 | ) | (22,748 | ) | (1,554 | ) | 24,275 | (22,775 | ) | |||||||||||
Loss attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
| | 27 | | 27 | |||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income
attributable to American
Reprographics Company |
$ | (22,748 | ) | $ | (22,748 | ) | $ | (1,527 | ) | $ | 24,275 | $ | (22,748 | ) | ||||||
25
Table of Contents
Consolidating Condensed Statement of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2011
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2011
American | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reprographics | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) (Unaudited) | Company | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Total | |||||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating
activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by
operating activities |
$ | (10,881 | ) | $ | 41,255 | $ | (884 | ) | $ | | $ | 29,490 | ||||||||
Cash flows from investing
activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
| (10,766 | ) | (1,172 | ) | | (11,938 | ) | ||||||||||||
Payment for swap transaction |
| (9,729 | ) | | | (9,729 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other |
| 1,054 | (129 | ) | | 925 | ||||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing
activities |
| (19,441 | ) | (1,301 | ) | | (20,742 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash flows from financing
activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from stock option
exercises |
| 108 | | | 108 | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of
common stock under Employee
Stock Purchase Plan |
| 31 | | | 31 | |||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefit related to
stock-based compensation |
| 31 | | | 31 | |||||||||||||||
Payments on long-term debt
agreements and capital leases |
| (18,718 | ) | (1,001 | ) | | (19,719 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net borrowings under
revolving credit facilities |
9,800 | | 1,022 | | 10,822 | |||||||||||||||
Payment of deferred loan fees |
(668 | ) | | | | (668 | ) | |||||||||||||
Advances to/from subsidiaries |
1,749 | (1,522 | ) | (227 | ) | | | |||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used
in) financing activities |
10,881 | (20,070 | ) | (206 | ) | | (9,395 | ) | ||||||||||||
Effect of foreign currency
translation on cash balances |
| | 308 | | 308 | |||||||||||||||
Net change in cash and cash
equivalents |
| 1,744 | (2,083 | ) | | (339 | ) | |||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period |
| 12,587 | 13,706 | | 26,293 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at
end of period |
$ | | $ | 14,331 | $ | 11,623 | $ | | $ | 25,954 | ||||||||||
26
Table of Contents
Consolidating Condensed Statement of Cash Flows
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2010
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2010
American | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reprographics | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) (Unaudited) | Company | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Total | |||||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating
activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by
operating activities |
$ | | $ | 35,358 | $ | 2,650 | $ | | $ | 38,008 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from investing
activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
| (4,900 | ) | (796 | ) | | (5,696 | ) | ||||||||||||
Payments for businesses
acquired, net of cash
acquired and including other
cash payments associated with
the acquisitions |
| (500 | ) | | | (500 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other |
| 892 | (138 | ) | | 754 | ||||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing
activities |
| (4,508 | ) | (934 | ) | | (5,442 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash flows from financing
activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from stock option
exercises |
| 125 | | | 125 | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of
common stock under Employee
Stock Purchase Plan |
| 37 | | | 37 | |||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefit related to
stock-based compensation |
| 38 | | | 38 | |||||||||||||||
Payments on long-term debt
agreements and capital leases |
| (31,284 | ) | (919 | ) | | (32,203 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net repayments under
revolving credit facility |
| | (450 | ) | | (450 | ) | |||||||||||||
Advances to/from subsidiaries |
| 1,140 | (1,140 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||
Net cash used in financing
activities |
| (29,944 | ) | (2,509 | ) | | (32,453 | ) | ||||||||||||
Effect of foreign currency
translation on cash balances |
| | 265 | | 265 | |||||||||||||||
Net change in cash and cash
equivalents |
| 906 | (528 | ) | | 378 | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period |
| 15,319 | 14,058 | | 29,377 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at
end of period |
$ | | $ | 16,225 | $ | 13,530 | $ | | $ | 29,755 | ||||||||||
27
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our interim Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements and the related notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in
this report as well as Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations included in our 2010 Form 10-K and our Forms 10-Q for the first and second quarters of
fiscal year 2011.
Executive Summary
American Reprographics Company (ARC, the Company, we or us) is the largest reprographics
company in the United States. We provide business-to-business document management services
primarily to the architectural, engineering and construction (AEC) industry, through a nationwide
network of service centers.
We also serve a variety of clients and businesses outside the AEC industry in need of sophisticated
document management services similar to our core AEC offerings.
Our services apply to time-sensitive and graphic-intensive documents and fall into four primary
categories:
| Document management. Document management involves storing, tracking and providing
authorized access to documents we maintain on our customers behalf. This is largely
accomplished through digital database management as documents enter our digital
infrastructure and are maintained on our production workstations, servers and networks. |
||
| Document distribution and logistics. Document distribution and logistics involves
transferring digital documents throughout our local and wide-area computer networks, and
over the internet, as well as the pickup, delivery and shipping of hardcopy documents to
and from locations around the world. |
||
| Print-on-demand. Print-on-demand involves quick-turnaround digital printing in black and
white and color, and in a wide variety of sizes and formats. |
||
| Facilities management. On-site services, frequently referred to as FMs, is any
combination of the above services supplied at a customers location. On-site services
involve placing equipment, technology applications, and sometimes staff in our customers
location to provide convenience printing and other reprographics services. Our FM service
offering is evolving to include the management of entire print networks in our customers
offices, which we refer to as managed print services or MPS. |
We deliver these services through our specialized technology, more than 550 sales and customer
service employees, and approximately 5,900 on-site services facilities at our customers locations.
All of our local service centers are connected by a digital infrastructure, allowing us to deliver
services, products, and value to more than 120,000 U.S. customers who purchased goods and services
from us in the past 24 months.
In the past, industry conventions led us to maintain acquired brands wherever practical due to the
local nature of construction activity. Therefore, historically, our operating segments functioned
under local brand names. Each brand name typically represents a business or group of businesses
that has been acquired by us. Over the past several years, however, many large construction
companies have grown through mergers and acquisitions, creating a market in which we believe
regional or national service providers have a greater marketing advantage. Beginning in January
2011, each of our operating segments and their respective locations began to adopt the acronym
ARC as a common brand. This single brand will highlight the scope and scale of our services,
which we believe will offer certain business advantages with respect to our customers that have a
national presence. Original brand names will continue to be used in conjunction with the single ARC
brand to reinforce our continuing presence in the business communities we serve, and ongoing
relationships with our customers. The latest date we expect to fully retire original trade names is
April 2012.
A significant component of our historical growth has been from acquisitions. Acquisition activity,
however, has not been a meaningful part of our 2011 and 2010 operations due to the potential risks
inherent in a domestic economy recovering from a recession. Since 2010, we have acquired two
Chinese businesses through UNIS Document Solutions Co. Ltd., (UDS), our business venture with
Unisplendour Corporation Limited (Unisplendour) for $2.0 million in the aggregate.
Evaluating our Performance. We believe we are able to deliver value to our stockholders by:
| Creating consistent, profitable growth, or in the absence of growth due to market
conditions beyond our control, margins superior to commonly understood industry benchmarks; |
||
| Maintaining our industry leadership position as measured by our geographical footprint,
market share and revenue generation capabilities; |
||
| Continuing to develop and invest in our products, services, and technology to meet the
changing needs of our customers; |
28
Table of Contents
| Maintaining a low cost structure; and |
||
| Maintaining a flexible capital structure that provides for both responsible debt service
and pursuit of acquisitions and other high-return investments. |
Primary Financial Measures. We use, among other measurements, net sales, costs and expenses,
earnings before taxes (EBT), earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT), earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) and operating cash flow to assess the
performance of our business.
We identify operating segments based on the various business activities that earn revenue and incur
expense, whose operating results are reviewed by the chief operating decision maker. Because our
operating segments have similar products and services, classes of customers, production processes
and economic characteristics, we are deemed to operate as a single reportable segment.
Please refer to our 2010 Form 10-K for more information regarding our primary financial measures.
Other Common Financial Measures. We also use a variety of other common financial measures as
indicators of our performance, including:
| Net income and earnings per share; |
||
| Material and labor costs as a percentage of net sales; |
||
| Days sales outstanding/days sales inventory/days payable outstanding; and |
||
| Cash flows from operations. |
We analyze these and other financial measures on a consolidated basis to evaluate corporate trends
and performance. In addition, we monitor some of these measures on a daily basis and operating
segment by operating segment through use of our proprietary company intranet and reporting tools.
Our corporate operations staff also conducts a monthly variance analysis on the income statement,
balance sheet, and cash flows of each operating segment.
Not all of these financial measurements are represented directly on our Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements, but meaningful discussions of each are part of our periodic disclosures and
presentations to the investment community.
Acquisitions. Our disciplined approach to complementary acquisitions in the past has led us to
acquire reprographics businesses that (1) fit our profile for performance potential, (2) can be
acquired for a price that fits our parameters, and (3) meet our strategic criteria for gaining
market share.
None of our individual acquisitions in the past three years have added a material percentage of
sales to our overall business. In the aggregate, however, our acquisitions have fueled the bulk of
our historical annual sales growth. Acquisition activity has not been a meaningful part of our 2011
and 2010 operations due to the potential risks of such activity inherent in an economy recovering
from a recession. See Note 3 Goodwill and Other Intangibles Resulting from Business Acquisitions
to our interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
Economic Factors Affecting Financial Performance.
Based on a compilation of approximately 90% of revenues from our operating segments and certain
assumptions derived from data relating to AEC and non-AEC customers, we estimate that sales to the
AEC industry accounted for 77% of our net sales for the period ended September 30, 2011, with the
remaining 23% consisting of sales to non-AEC industries. As a result, our operating results and
financial condition is significantly affected by economic factors that influence the AEC industry,
such as the availability of commercial credit at reasonably attractive rates, non-residential and
residential construction spending, GDP growth, interest rates, unemployment rates, commercial
vacancy rates, and government expenditures. The effects of the current economic environment in the
United States, and weakness in global economic conditions, have resulted in a significant reduction
of activity in the non-residential and residential portions of the AEC industry, which in turn, has
produced a decline in our revenues over the past three years. We believe that the AEC industry
generally experiences downturns several months after a downturn in the general economy and that
there may be a similar delay in the recovery of the AEC industry following a recovery in the
general economy. Similar to the AEC industry, the reprographics industry typically lags a recovery
in the broader economy.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
EBIT, EBITDA and related ratios presented in this report are supplemental measures of our
performance that are not required by or presented in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). These measures are not measurements of
our financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to net income,
income from operations, or any other
performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP, or as an alternative to cash flows from
operating, investing or financing activities as a measure of our liquidity.
29
Table of Contents
EBIT represents net income before interest and taxes. EBITDA represents net income before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization. Amortization does not include $0.5 million and $3.8 million
of stock-based compensation expense recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses, for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. Amortization does not include
$1.5 million and $4.4 million of stock-based compensation expense recorded in selling, general and
administrative expenses, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. EBIT
margin is a non-GAAP measure calculated by dividing EBIT by net sales. EBITDA margin is a non-GAAP
measure calculated by dividing EBITDA by net sales.
We present EBIT, EBITDA and related ratios because we consider them important supplemental measures
of our performance and liquidity. We believe investors may also find these measures meaningful,
given how our management makes use of them. The following is a discussion of our use of these
measures.
We use EBIT and EBITDA to measure and compare the performance of our operating segments. Our
operating segments financial performance includes all of the operating activities except debt and
taxation which are managed at the corporate level for U.S. operating segments. As a result, EBIT is
the best measure of operating segment profitability and the most useful metric by which to measure
and compare the performance of our operating segments. We also use EBIT to measure performance for
determining operating segment-level compensation and we use EBITDA to measure performance for
determining consolidated-level compensation. In addition, we use EBIT and EBITDA to evaluate
potential acquisitions and potential capital expenditures.
EBIT, EBITDA and related ratios have limitations as analytical tools, and should not be considered
in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these
limitations are as follows:
| They do not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements for capital
expenditures and contractual commitments; |
||
| They do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs; |
||
| They do not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements
necessary, to service interest or principal payments on our debt; |
||
| Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being
depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA does not
reflect any cash requirements for such replacements; and |
||
| Other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate these measures
differently than we do, limiting their usefulness as comparative measures. |
Because of these limitations, EBIT, EBITDA, and related ratios should not be considered as measures
of discretionary cash available to us to invest in business growth or to reduce our indebtedness.
We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using EBIT, EBITDA
and related ratios only as supplements.
Our presentation of adjusted net income and adjusted EBITDA over certain periods is an attempt to
provide meaningful comparisons to our historical performance for our existing and future investors.
The unprecedented changes in our end markets over the past several years have required us to take
measures that are unique in our history and specific to individual circumstances. Comparisons
inclusive of these actions make normal financial and other performance patterns difficult to
discern under a strict GAAP presentation. Each non-GAAP presentation, however, is explained in
detail in the reconciliation tables below.
Specifically, we have presented adjusted net income (loss) attributable to ARC and adjusted
earnings (loss) per share attributable to ARC shareholders for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2011 and 2010 to reflect the exclusion of the goodwill impairment charge,
amortization impact related specifically to the change in useful lives of trade names, interest
rate swap related costs, the valuation allowance related to certain deferred tax assets and other
discrete tax items. This presentation facilitates a meaningful comparison of our operating results
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. We believe these charges were the
result of the current macroeconomic environment, our capital restructuring, or other items which
are not indicative of our actual operating performance.
We presented adjusted EBITDA in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 to exclude the
non-cash goodwill impairment charges of $42.1 million and $65.4 million, respectively, and
stock-based compensation expense of $0.5 million and $3.8 million, respectively. We presented
adjusted EBITDA in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 to exclude the non-cash
goodwill impairment charge of $38.3 million and stock-based compensation expense of $1.5 million
and $4.4 million, respectively. The exclusion of the goodwill impairment charges and stock-based
compensation expense to arrive at adjusted EBITDA is consistent with the definition of adjusted
EBITDA in our previous and current credit agreements; therefore, we believe this information is
useful to investors in assessing our ability to meet our debt covenants.
30
Table of Contents
The following is a reconciliation of cash flows provided by operating activities to EBIT, EBITDA,
and net loss attributable to ARC:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Cash flows provided by operating activities |
$ | 17,617 | $ | 10,262 | $ | 29,490 | $ | 38,008 | ||||||||
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities, net of effect of
business acquisitions |
(7,504 | ) | 6,166 | 19,078 | 7,443 | |||||||||||
Non-cash expenses, including
depreciation and amortization |
(51,809 | ) | (41,645 | ) | (178,688 | ) | (68,226 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax (benefit) provision |
(2,392 | ) | (12,668 | ) | 51,872 | (10,862 | ) | |||||||||
Interest expense, net |
7,743 | 5,614 | 23,609 | 17,256 | ||||||||||||
Net (income) loss attributable to the
noncontrolling interest |
(61 | ) | 73 | 90 | 27 | |||||||||||
EBIT |
(36,406 | ) | (32,198 | ) | (54,549 | ) | (16,354 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
11,711 | 10,757 | 36,363 | 33,521 | ||||||||||||
EBITDA |
(24,695 | ) | (21,441 | ) | (18,186 | ) | 17,167 | |||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(7,743 | ) | (5,614 | ) | (23,609 | ) | (17,256 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax benefit (provision) |
2,392 | 12,668 | (51,872 | ) | 10,862 | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(11,711 | ) | (10,757 | ) | (36,363 | ) | (33,521 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss attributable to ARC |
$ | (41,757 | ) | $ | (25,144 | ) | $ | (130,030 | ) | $ | (22,748 | ) | ||||
31
Table of Contents
The following is a reconciliation of net loss attributable to ARC to EBIT, EBITDA and adjusted
EBITDA:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to ARC |
$ | (41,757 | ) | $ | (25,144 | ) | $ | (130,030 | ) | $ | (22,748 | ) | ||||
Interest expense, net |
7,743 | 5,614 | 23,609 | 17,256 | ||||||||||||
Income tax (benefit) provision |
(2,392 | ) | (12,668 | ) | 51,872 | (10,862 | ) | |||||||||
EBIT |
(36,406 | ) | (32,198 | ) | (54,549 | ) | (16,354 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
11,711 | 10,757 | 36,363 | 33,521 | ||||||||||||
EBITDA |
(24,695 | ) | (21,441 | ) | (18,186 | ) | 17,167 | |||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
42,109 | 38,263 | 65,444 | 38,263 | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
517 | 1,453 | 3,775 | 4,371 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 17,931 | $ | 18,275 | $ | 51,033 | $ | 59,801 | ||||||||
The following is a reconciliation of net loss margin attributable to ARC to EBIT margin, EBITDA
margin and adjusted EBITDA margin:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011(1) | 2010(1) | 2011(1) | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net loss margin attributable to ARC |
(39.8 | )% | (23.0 | )% | (40.5 | )% | (6.8 | )% | ||||||||
Interest expense, net |
7.4 | 5.1 | 7.4 | 5.1 | ||||||||||||
Income tax (benefit) provision |
(2.3 | ) | (11.6 | ) | 16.2 | (3.2 | ) | |||||||||
EBIT margin |
(34.7 | ) | (29.4 | ) | (17.0 | ) | (4.9 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
11.2 | 9.8 | 11.3 | 10.0 | ||||||||||||
EBITDA margin |
(23.6 | ) | (19.6 | ) | (5.7 | ) | 5.1 | |||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
40.2 | 35.0 | 20.4 | 11.4 | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
0.5 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA margin |
17.1 | % | 16.7 | % | 15.9 | % | 17.8 | % | ||||||||
(1) | Column does not foot due to rounding |
32
Table of Contents
The following is a reconciliation of net loss attributable to ARC to unaudited adjusted net income
(loss) attributable to ARC: |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to ARC |
$ | (41,757 | ) | $ | (25,144 | ) | $ | (130,030 | ) | $ | (22,748 | ) | ||||
Goodwill impairment |
42,109 | 38,263 | 65,444 | 38,263 | ||||||||||||
Change in trade name impact to amortization |
2,368 | | 7,106 | | ||||||||||||
Interest rate swap related costs |
1,389 | 44 | 4,369 | 150 | ||||||||||||
Income tax benefit related to above items |
(6,866 | ) | (12,838 | ) | (14,745 | ) | (12,880 | ) | ||||||||
Deferred tax valuation allowance and other
discrete tax items |
3,832 | | 67,040 | | ||||||||||||
Unaudited adjusted net income (loss)
attributable to ARC |
$ | 1,075 | $ | 325 | $ | (816 | ) | $ | 2,785 | |||||||
Actual: |
||||||||||||||||
Loss per share attributable to ARC shareholders: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.92 | ) | $ | (0.56 | ) | $ | (2.87 | ) | $ | (0.50 | ) | ||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.92 | ) | $ | (0.56 | ) | $ | (2.87 | ) | $ | (0.50 | ) | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
45,416 | 45,224 | 45,366 | 45,191 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
45,416 | 45,224 | 45,366 | 45,191 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted: |
||||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to ARC
shareholders: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.02 | $ | 0.01 | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.06 | |||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.02 | $ | 0.01 | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.06 | |||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
45,416 | 45,224 | 45,366 | 45,191 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
45,448 | 45,439 | 45,366 | 45,433 |
33
Table of Contents
Results of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010
The following table provides information on the percentages of certain items of selected financial
data compared to net sales for the periods indicated:
As Percentage of Net Sales | As Percentage of Net Sales | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011(1) | 2010(1) | 2011(1) | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net Sales |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
67.6 | 68.0 | 67.9 | 66.9 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
32.4 | 32.0 | 32.1 | 33.1 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
22.5 | 24.3 | 24.4 | 24.3 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
4.4 | 2.3 | 4.4 | 2.3 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
40.2 | 35.0 | 20.4 | 11.4 | ||||||||||||
Loss from operations |
(34.7 | ) | (29.5 | ) | (17.1 | ) | (4.9 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense, net |
7.4 | 5.1 | 7.4 | 5.1 | ||||||||||||
Loss before income tax (benefit) provision |
(42.1 | ) | (34.6 | ) | (24.4 | ) | (10.0 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax (benefit) provision |
(2.3 | ) | (11.6 | ) | 16.2 | (3.2 | ) | |||||||||
Net loss |
(39.8 | ) | (23.0 | ) | (40.6 | ) | (6.8 | ) | ||||||||
(Income) loss attributable to the
noncontrolling interest |
(0.1 | ) | 0.1 | | | |||||||||||
Net loss attributable to ARC |
(39.8 | )% | (23.0 | )% | (40.5 | )% | (6.8 | )% | ||||||||
(1) | Column does not foot due to rounding |
Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 Compared to Three and Nine Months Ended September
30, 2010
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | Increase (decrease) | September 30, | Increase (decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions, except percentages) | 2011 | 2010 | $ | % | 2011 | 2010(1) | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reprographics services |
$ | 65.5 | $ | 72.7 | $ | (7.2 | ) | (9.9 | )% | $ | 206.0 | $ | 227.4 | $ | (21.4 | ) | (9.4 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Facilities management |
25.5 | 22.6 | 2.9 | 12.8 | % | 75.3 | 67.6 | 7.7 | 11.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Equipment and supplies sales |
13.8 | 14.1 | (0.3 | ) | (2.1 | )% | 39.6 | 41.6 | (2.0 | ) | (4.8 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total net sales |
$ | 104.8 | $ | 109.4 | $ | (4.6 | ) | (4.2 | )% | $ | 320.9 | $ | 336.7 | $ | (15.7 | ) | (4.7 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 33.9 | $ | 35.0 | $ | (1.1 | ) | (3.1 | )% | $ | 103.0 | $ | 111.3 | $ | (8.3 | ) | (7.5 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative
expenses |
$ | 23.5 | $ | 26.6 | $ | (3.1 | ) | (11.7 | )% | $ | 78.2 | $ | 81.9 | $ | (3.7 | ) | (4.5 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
$ | 4.7 | $ | 2.5 | $ | 2.2 | 88.0 | % | $ | 14.1 | $ | 7.7 | $ | 6.4 | 83.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
$ | 42.1 | $ | 38.3 | $ | 3.8 | 9.9 | % | $ | 65.4 | $ | 38.3 | $ | 27.1 | 70.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
$ | 7.7 | $ | 5.6 | $ | 2.1 | 37.5 | % | $ | 23.6 | $ | 17.3 | $ | 6.3 | 36.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Income tax (benefit) provision |
$ | (2.4 | ) | $ | (12.7 | ) | $ | 10.3 | (81.1 | )% | $ | 51.9 | $ | (10.9 | ) | $ | 62.8 | (576.1 | )% | |||||||||||||
Net loss attributable to ARC |
$ | (41.8 | ) | $ | (25.1 | ) | $ | (16.7 | ) | 66.5 | % | $ | (130.0 | ) | $ | (22.7 | ) | $ | (107.3 | ) | 472.7 | % | ||||||||||
EBITDA |
$ | (24.7 | ) | $ | (21.4 | ) | $ | (3.3 | ) | 15.4 | % | $ | (18.2 | ) | $ | 17.2 | $ | (35.4 | ) | (205.8 | )% |
(1) | Column does not foot due to rounding |
Net Sales
Net sales decreased by 4.2% and 4.7% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011,
respectively, compared to the same periods in 2010. The decrease in net sales was primarily due to
an overall decrease in construction industry spending, especially in the non-residential building
segment.
34
Table of Contents
Reprographics services. Reprographic services sales decreased by $7.2 million, or 9.9%, and $21.4
million, or 9.4%, during the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2010.
Overall reprographics services sales nationwide were negatively affected by the lack of significant
new construction activity in the AEC industry. The revenue category that was most affected was
large-format black-and-white printing, as this revenue category is more closely tied to
non-residential and residential construction activity. Large-format black-and-white printing
revenues represented approximately 33% of reprographics services for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2011; large-format black-and-white printing revenues decreased by approximately
17% for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2010.
Large and small-format color printing in both the AEC market, and in the non-AEC market, comprised
approximately 29% of our overall reprographics services sales for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2011, as compared to approximately 25% during the same periods of 2010. Despite the
weakness in the AEC industry, net sales of digital color printing services have increased
approximately 2% and 4% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the same
periods in 2010. We partly attribute this growth in digital color printing to the continuing
marketing activity by our non-AEC customers and our focus in the color market.
We believe there is a growing demand for digital color printing services across all market segments
due to increased equipment availability and lower production prices. We have branded a portion of
our operations to address this growing demand for digital color printing. As of September 30, 2011,
our new marketing unit, Riot Creative Imaging, featured 12 dedicated production facilities in major
metropolitan areas around the United States.
Facilities management. FM, or on-site services, sales for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2011, increased $2.9 million, or 12.8%, and $7.7 million, or 11.4%, respectively, as
compared to the same periods in 2010. The number of FM accounts has remained stable at
approximately 5,900 for the past 12 months, however we have experienced higher volumes from our
stable customer base and attracted new large high-volume customers, even as existing contracts have
been cancelled or have not been renewed. FM revenue is derived from a single cost per square foot
of printed material, similar to our traditional reprographics services sales. As convenience and
speed continue to characterize our customers needs, and as printing equipment continues to become
smaller and more affordable, the trend of placing equipment, and sometimes staff, in an
architectural studio or construction company office remains strong. By placing equipment on-site
and billing on a per-use and per-project basis, the invoice continues to be issued by us, just as
if the work was produced in one of our production facilities. The resulting benefit is the
convenience of on-site production with a pass-through or reimbursable cost of business that many
customers continue to find attractive.
In addition, much of the growth in our FM business can be attributed to the increase in our managed
print services (MPS) business, specifically from accounts with our larger clients. MPS addresses
the needs of general office printing as compared to FMs, which address the onsite reprographic
needs of the customer.
Equipment and supplies sales. Equipment and supplies sales for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2011 decreased $0.3 million, or 2.1% and $2.0 million, or 4.8%, respectively, as
compared to the same periods in 2010. The decrease in equipment and supplies sales was primarily
due to our Chinese operations, which experienced a reduction in year-over-year sales volume of $1.3
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, partially due to increased competition for a
major manufacturers reselling channel.
Gross Profit
Our gross profit and gross profit margin were $33.9 million, or 32.4%, during the three months
ended September 30, 2011, during which time we experienced a year-over-year sales decline of $4.6
million. This compares to $35.0 million, or 32.0%, during the same period in 2010.
Our gross profit and gross profit margin were $103.0 million, or 32.1%, respectively, during the
nine months ended September 30, 2011, during which time we experienced a year-over-year sales
decline of $15.7 million. This compares to $111.3 million, or 33.1%, during the same period in
2010.
The increase in gross margins of 40 basis points for the three months ended September 30, 2011, as
compared to the same period in 2010 was primarily due to a reconfiguration of our labor force
designed to address the overall decline in sales and increased demand in on-site sales.
Specifically, labor as a percentage of revenue decreased 120 basis points during the three months
ended September 30, 2011, as compared to the same periods in 2010. The decrease of 120 basis
points in labor was partially offset by a 90 basis point increase in material as a percentage of
sales of that was driven in part by higher material costs as a percentage of color sales and lower
margin equipment and supplies sales.
The decrease in gross margins of 100 basis points for the nine months ended September 30, 2011,
compared to the same period in 2010 is primarily due to higher material costs as a percentage of
sales driven by the same factors noted above. Specifically, material costs as a percentage of
revenue increased by 120 basis points during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, as compared
to the same periods in 2010.
35
Table of Contents
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $3.1 million, or 11.7%, during the three
months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $3.7 million, or 4.5%, during the nine
months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010.
The decrease was primarily due to cost cutting initiatives implemented in 2011. General and
administrative expenses in total decreased $2.4 million, or 13%, and $3.8 million, or 7%, for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2010.
This decrease was primarily driven by the reconfiguration of our labor force to increase
utilization in our operating regions as noted above and a decrease in stock based compensation. The
result of the cost cutting initiatives was lower general and administrative compensation, which
decreased by $0.8 million and $2.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011,
respectively, compared to the same periods in 2010. Stock based compensation decreased by $1.0
million and $0.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared to the
same periods in 2010 primarily due to the full vesting in May of 2011 of the options granted as
part of our 2009 stock options exchange program.
Sales compensation decreased $0.6 million during the three months ended September 30, 2011, as
compared to the same period in 2010 due to the decrease in sales, partially offset by the hiring of
additional sales personnel to implement specific sales initiatives, such as Riot Creative Imaging,
and our MPS offering.
Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased from 24.3% in
the three months ended September 30, 2010 to 22.5% in the three months ended September 30, 2011,
and increased slightly from 24.3% in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to 24.4% in the three
months ended September 30, 2011. The decrease as a percentage of sales for the three months ended
September 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010 was primarily due to the decrease in stock
based compensation and the cost cutting initiatives discussed above.
Amortization of Intangibles
Amortization of intangibles increased by $2.2 million and $6.4 million for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2010. This increase
is due to the revised useful lives assigned to trade names during the fourth quarter of 2010.
Goodwill Impairment
We assess goodwill for impairment annually as of September 30 and more frequently if events and
circumstances indicate that goodwill might be impaired. Goodwill impairment testing is performed at
the reporting unit level.
At September 30, 2011, we performed our annual goodwill impairment analysis, which indicated that
nine of our 37 reporting units, eight in the United States and one in Canada, had a goodwill
impairment as of September 30, 2011. Accordingly, we recorded a pretax, non-cash charge for the
three months ended September 30, 2011 to reduce the carrying value of goodwill by $42.1 million.
At June 30, 2011, we determined that there were sufficient indicators to trigger an interim
goodwill impairment analysis. The indicators included, among other factors: (1) the economic
environment, (2) the performance against plan of reporting units which previously had goodwill
impairment, and (3) revised forecasted future earnings. Our analysis indicated that six of our 36
reporting units, all of which are located in the United States, had a goodwill impairment as of
June 30, 2011. Accordingly, we recorded a pretax, non-cash charge during the second quarter of 2011
to reduce the carrying value of goodwill by $23.3 million.
See Critical Accounting Policies section for further information related to our goodwill
impairment test.
Interest Expense, Net
Net interest expense was $7.7 million and $23.6 million during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2011, respectively, compared to $5.6 million and $17.3 million in the same periods in
2010. The increase in interest expense was primarily driven by the amortization of the amended
interest rate swap, which was reclassified out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss into
earnings as a result of the de-designation from hedge accounting on December 1, 2010, which totaled
$1.4 million and $4.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively.
We also incurred a higher effective interest rate due to the issuance of the 10.5% senior unsecured
notes (the Notes) on December 1, 2010, resulting in additional interest expense of $1.2 million
and $3.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011. These increases were
partially offset by a reduction in the average debt balance by $22.1 million from the nine months
ended September 30 2010 to the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
36
Table of Contents
Income Taxes
We recorded an income tax benefit of $2.4 million in relation to a pretax loss of $44.1 million and
an income tax provision of $51.9 million in relation to a pretax loss of $78.2 million for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. For the three months ended September
30, 2011, the low income tax benefit was primarily due to the impact of a stock basis goodwill
impairment charge of $27.1 million, which is nondeductible for U.S. income tax purposes, in
addition to an additional valuation allowance of $1.4 million recorded against certain deferred tax
assets recognized in the same period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the income tax
provision of $51.9 million is primarily due to the establishment of a $65.7 million non-cash
valuation allowance against certain of our deferred tax assets. The deferred tax assets remain
available to us for use in future profitable quarters.
The audit of our 2008 federal income tax return by the Internal Revenue Service was finalized
during the first quarter of 2011 and resulted in no adjustments. Due to this final result and other
pertinent factors, we derecognized our liability for an uncertain tax position of $1.5 million and
related accrued interest of $0.1 million.
Noncontrolling Interest
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest represents 35% of the income or
loss attributable to UDS, our Chinese operations, which commenced operations on August 1,
2008.
Net Loss Attributable to ARC
Net loss attributable to ARC was $41.8 million and $130.0 million during the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2011, respectively, compared to net loss attributable to ARC of $25.1 million
and $22.7 million in the same periods in 2010. The net loss attributable to ARC in 2011 is
primarily due to the goodwill impairment charges recognized in the second and third quarters of
2011, the establishment of a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, and the decrease in sales
described above.
EBITDA
EBITDA margin decreased to (23.6%) and (5.7%) during the three and nine months ended September 30,
2011, respectively, compared to (19.6)% and 5.1% during the same periods in 2010. Excluding the
impact of the goodwill impairment and stock based compensation, our adjusted EBITDA margin was
17.1% and 15.9% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, as compared
to 16.7% and 17.8% during the same periods in 2010. Adjusted EBITDA margin for the nine months
ended September 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010 was negatively affected by the
decrease in gross profit margin described above.
Impact of Inflation
Inflation has not had a significant effect on our operations. Price increases for raw materials,
such as paper and fuel charges, typically have been, and we expect will continue to be, passed on
to customers in the ordinary course of business.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of cash have been operations and borrowings under our debt agreements. Our
historical uses of cash have been for acquisitions of reprographics businesses, payment of
principal and interest on outstanding debt obligations, and capital expenditures. Total cash as of
September 30, 2011 was $26.0 million. Of this amount, $11.6 million was held in foreign countries.
Specifically, $11.2 million was held in China and is considered a permanent investment in UDS.
Supplemental information pertaining to our historical sources and uses of cash is presented as
follows and should be read in conjunction with our interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 17,617 | $ | 10,262 | $ | 29,490 | $ | 38,008 | ||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
$ | (4,038 | ) | $ | (3,510 | ) | $ | (20,742 | ) | $ | (5,442 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
$ | (9,535 | ) | $ | (10,913 | ) | $ | (9,395 | ) | $ | (32,453 | ) |
Operating Activities
Cash flows from operations are primarily driven by sales and net profit generated from these sales,
excluding non-cash charges.
37
Table of Contents
For the nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010, the decrease in
cash flows from operations was primarily due to the decline in sales and related profits, as noted
by the $8.8 million decrease in adjusted EBITDA during this time period, as well as an
increase in accounts receivable, partially offset by an increase in accrued interest. The increase
in accounts receivable was driven by the increase in sales in the third quarter of 2011 compared to
the fourth quarter of 2010, and an increase in days sales outstanding (DSO) from 48 days as of
September 30, 2010 to 52 days as of September 30, 2011. With the continued slowdown in the AEC
industry, we will continue to focus on our accounts receivable collections and DSO. If the recent
negative sales trends continue throughout 2011 and 2012, it will significantly impact our cash
flows from operations in the future. Accrued interest increased due to the timing of interest
payments on our Notes, which are made on a semi-annual basis on June 15 and December 15, as
compared to quarterly under our 2010 senior credit facility.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities of $20.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011
relates to capital expenditures of $11.9 million plus payment to terminate the swap transaction of
$9.7 million, partially offset by $0.9 million of cash inflows from other investing activities.
Cash flows from other investing activities primarily relate to the cash proceeds generated from the
sale of fixed assets.
Financing Activities
Net cash of $9.4 million used in financing activities during the nine months ended September 30,
2011 primarily relates to scheduled payments under capital leases and seller notes of $19.7
million, partially offset by borrowings under our revolving credit facilities of $10.8 million,
which included $9.8 million under the $50 million credit agreement (the 2010 Credit Agreement).
Borrowings under the 2010 Credit Agreement were used in part, to terminate the swap transaction of
$9.7 million.
Our cash position, working capital, and debt obligations as of September 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010 are shown below and should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Balance Sheets and
notes thereto contained elsewhere in this report.
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(In thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 25,954 | $ | 26,293 | ||||
Working capital |
$ | 37,667 | $ | 22,387 | ||||
Borrowings from senior secured credit
facility and Notes (1) |
$ | 206,920 | $ | 195,692 | ||||
Other debt obligations |
31,682 | 43,932 | ||||||
Total debt obligations |
$ | 238,602 | $ | 239,624 | ||||
(1) | Notes, net of discount of $3,902 and $4,308 at September 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively. |
The increase of $15.3 million in working capital in 2011 was due to an increase in other
current assets of $12.7 million, an increase in accounts receivable of $8.3 million, a decrease in
accrued expenses of $5.2 million, partially offset by a decrease in deferred income taxes of $7.2
million and an increase in the current portion of long-term debt of $3.0 million. The increase in
other current assets is primarily attributed to an increase in income taxes receivable related to
carryback of 2010 tax losses to 2008, of which we collected $12.1 million in October 2011. The
increase in accounts receivable is due to the increase in sales in August and September 2011, as
compared to November and December 2010, as well as the increase in DSO from 45 days as of December
31, 2010 to 52 days as of September 30, 2011. The decrease in accrued expenses is primarily related
to the payment upon termination of the swap transaction, which was paid using borrowings from the
2010 Credit Agreement. Borrowings under the 2010 Credit Agreement are offset by the $5.6 million
decrease in the current portion of seller notes. To manage our working capital, we focus on our
number of days sales outstanding and monitor the aging of our accounts receivable, as receivables
are the most significant element of our working capital.
We believe that our current cash balance of $26.0 million, availability under our revolving credit
facility and additional cash flows provided by operations should be adequate to cover the next
twelve months working capital needs, debt service requirements consisting of scheduled principal
and interest payments, and planned capital expenditures, to the extent such items are known or are
reasonably determinable based on current business and market conditions. In addition, we may elect
to finance certain of our capital expenditure requirements through the issuance of additional debt
which is dependent on availability of third party financing. See Debt Obligations section for
further information related to the 2010 Credit Agreement.
We generate the majority of our revenue from sales of products and services provided to the AEC
industry. As a result, our operating results and financial condition can be significantly affected
by economic factors that influence the AEC industry, such as non-residential and residential
construction spending. The downturn in the residential and non-residential construction activity in
the AEC industry, has adversely affected our operating results. The current diminished liquidity
and credit availability in financial markets and the general economic environment may adversely
affect the ability of our customers and suppliers to obtain financing for significant operations
and purchases, and to perform their obligations under their agreements with us. We believe the
credit constraints in the financial markets are resulting in a decrease in, or cancellation of,
existing business, could limit new business, and could negatively impact our ability to collect our
accounts receivable on a timely basis. We are unable to predict the duration and severity of the
downturn in the construction industry or its effects on our business and results of operations.
38
Table of Contents
Debt Obligations
10.5% Senior Notes due 2016
On December 1, 2010, we completed a private placement of 10.5% senior unsecured notes due 2016.
The Notes have an aggregate principal amount of $200 million, and are general unsecured senior
obligations and are subordinate to all of our existing and future senior secured debt to the extent
of the assets securing such debt. We received gross proceeds of $195.6 million from the Notes
offering. Our obligations under the Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed by all of our
domestic subsidiaries. The issue price was 97.824% with a yield to maturity of 11.0%. Interest on
the Notes accrues at a rate of 10.5% per annum and is payable semiannually in arrears on June 15
and December 15 of each year, commencing on June 15, 2011. We will make each interest payment to
the holders of record of the Notes on the immediately preceding June 1 and December 1.
Repurchase upon Change of Control. In connection with the issuance of the Notes, we entered into an
indenture (the Indenture). Upon the occurrence of a change in control (as defined in the
Indenture), each holder of the Notes may require us to repurchase all of the then-outstanding Notes
in cash at a price equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes to be repurchased,
plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of repurchase.
Other Covenants. The Indenture contains covenants that limit, among other things, our companys and
certain of our subsidiaries ability to (1) incur certain additional debt and issue preferred
stock, (2) make certain restricted payments, (3) consummate specified asset sales, (4) enter into
certain transactions with affiliates, (5) create liens, (6) declare or pay any dividend or make any
other distributions, (7) make certain investments, and (8) merge or consolidate with another
person.
Events of Default. The Indenture provides for customary events of default (subject in certain cases
to customary grace and cure periods), which include non-payment, breach of covenants in the
Indenture, cross default and acceleration of other indebtedness, a failure to pay certain judgments
and certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency. Generally, if an event of default occurs, the
Trustee or holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the then outstanding Notes may declare
the principal of and accrued but unpaid interest on all of the then-outstanding Notes to be due and
payable.
Exchange Offer. Pursuant to a registered exchange offer in May 2011, we offered to exchange up to
$200 million aggregate principal amount of the Notes, for new notes that were registered under the
Securities Act. The terms of the registered notes are the same as the terms of the Notes, except
that they are registered under the Securities Act and the transfer restrictions, registration
rights and additional interest provisions are not applicable. We accepted the exchange of $200
million aggregate principal amounts of the Notes that were properly tendered in the exchange offer.
2010 Credit Agreement
In connection with the issuance of the Notes, our company and certain of our subsidiaries also
entered into the 2010 Credit Agreement and paid off in full amounts outstanding under our prior
credit agreement.
The 2010 Credit Agreement provides for a $50 million senior secured revolving line of credit, of
which up to $20 million is available for the issuance of letters of credit. The revolving line of
credit is available on a revolving basis until December 1, 2015 and is secured by substantially all
of our assets and certain of our subsidiaries. Advances under the revolving line of credit are
subject to customary borrowing conditions, including the accuracy of representations and warranties
and the absence of events of default. We may borrow, partially or wholly repay its outstanding
borrowings and reborrow, subject to the terms of the 2010 Credit Agreement.
The obligations under the 2010 Credit Agreement are guaranteed by our domestic subsidiaries and,
subject to certain exceptions, are secured by security interests granted in all of our and domestic
subsidiaries personal and real property.
Advances under the 2010 Credit Agreement bear interest at LIBOR plus the applicable rate. The
applicable rate is determined based upon our consolidated leverage ratio with a minimum and maximum
applicable rate of 1.50% and 2.00%, respectively. The initial applicable is 2.00%. During the
continuation of certain events of default, all amounts due under the 2010 Credit Agreement bear
interest at 4.0% above the rate otherwise applicable. In addition, we are required to pay an unused
commitment fee on the average daily unused amount of the line of credit at the applicable rate,
calculated and payable quarterly in arrears, as follows: if the consolidated leverage ratio is (i)
greater than or equal to 3.00x, the unused commitment fee is 0.20%, (ii) less than or equal to
2.99x but greater than or equal to 2.00x, 0.15%, and (iii) less than 2.00x, 0.10%.
39
Table of Contents
The 2010 Credit Agreement contains the following financial covenants:
| Maximum consolidated leverage ratio: |
| 4.35:1.00 for quarters ending December 31, 2010 through
September 30, 2011 |
||
| 4.25:1.00 for quarters ending December 31, 2011 through
September 30, 2012 |
||
| 4.15:1.00 for quarters ending December 31, 2012 through
September 30, 2013 |
||
| 4.00:1.00 for quarters ending December 31, 2013 through maturity; |
| Maximum consolidated senior secured debt leverage ratio not
greater than 1.50:1.00, determined on the last day of each
fiscal quarter through maturity; |
||
| Minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio: |
| 1.70:1.00 for quarters ending December 31, 2010 through
September 30, 2011 |
||
| 1.75:1.00 for quarters ending December 31, 2011 through maturity; |
The 2010 Credit Agreement also contains covenants which, subject to certain exceptions, restrict
our ability to incur additional debt, grant liens or guaranty other indebtedness, pay dividends,
redeem stock, pay or redeem subordinated indebtedness, make investments or capital expenditures,
dispose or acquire assets, dispose of equity interests in subsidiaries, enter into any merger, sale
of assets, consolidation or liquidation transaction, or engage in transactions with stockholders
and affiliates. Covenants in the 2010 Credit Agreement also require that we provide periodic
financial reports to the lender, observe certain practices and procedures with respect to the
collateral pledged as security, comply with applicable laws and maintain and preserve our companys
and our subsidiaries properties and insurance.
As of September 30, 2011, we were in compliance with the financial incurrence-based covenants under
the Notes and financial maintenance-based covenants under the 2010 Credit Agreement. Our trailing
twelve months key financial covenant ratios under the 2010 Credit Agreement as of September 30,
2011 were 1.80:1.00 for minimum interest coverage, 3.68:1.00 for maximum total leverage and
0.60:1.00 for maximum senior secured leverage.
As of September 30, 2011, we expect to remain in compliance through the respective terms of our
Notes and 2010 Credit Agreement. However, it is possible that a default under certain financial
covenants may occur in the future, should the minimum required profitability levels not be
achieved. If we default on the covenants under the 2010 Credit Agreement and are unable to obtain
waivers from our lenders, the lenders will be able to exercise their rights and remedies under the
2010 Credit Agreement, which would have a material adverse effect on our business and financial
condition.
As of September 30, 2011, standby letters of credit totaling $3.9 million had been issued. The
standby letters of credit under the 2010 Credit Agreement and borrowing of $9.8 million reduced our
borrowing availability under the 2010 Credit Agreement to $36.3 million as of September 30, 2011.
Foreign Credit Facility
In the second quarter of 2011, in conjunction with its Chinese operations, UDS entered into
one-year revolving credit facility. The facility provides for a maximum credit amount of 8.0
million Chinese Yuan Renminbi. This translates to U.S. $1.2 million as of September 30, 2011. Draws
on the facility are limited to 30 day periods and incur a fee of 0.5% of the amount drawn and no
additional interest is charged.
Interest Rate Swap Transaction
On December 19, 2007, we entered into an interest rate swap transaction in order to hedge the
floating interest rate risk on our then existing long term variable rate debt.
In connection with the issuance of the Notes, the swap transaction no longer qualified as a cash
flow hedge and was de-designated.
As of December 31, 2010, the swap transaction had a negative fair value of $9.7 million of which
all was recorded in accrued expenses. On January 3, 2011, the swap transaction was terminated and
settled. For further information, see Note 9 Derivatives and Hedging Transactions.
Capital Leases
As of September 30, 2011, we had $29.1 million of capital lease obligations outstanding, with a
weighted average interest rate of 8.5% and
maturities between 2011 and 2016.
40
Table of Contents
Seller Notes
As of September 30, 2011, we had $2.6 million of seller notes outstanding, with a weighted average
interest rate of 6.1% and maturities between 2011 and 2014. These notes were issued in connection
with prior acquisitions.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we did not have any relationships with
unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured
finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of
facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments
Operating Leases. We have entered into various non-cancelable operating leases primarily related to
facilities, equipment and vehicles used in the ordinary course of business.
Contingent Transaction Consideration. We have entered into earnout obligations in connection with
prior acquisitions. If the acquired businesses generate sales and/or operating profits in excess of
predetermined targets, we are obligated to make additional cash payments in accordance with the
terms of such earnout obligations. As of September 30, 2011, the Company has potential future
earnout obligations for acquisitions consummated before the adoption of ASC 805 of approximately
$1.5 million through 2014 if predetermined financial targets are met or exceeded, and earnout
obligations of $0.3 million through 2014 consummated subsequent to the adoption of ASC 805. Earnout
payments prior to the adoption of ASC 805 are recorded as additional purchase price (as goodwill)
when the contingent payments are earned and become payable.
Legal Proceedings. On October 21, 2010, a former employee, individually and on behalf of a
purported class consisting of all non-exempt employees who work or worked for American
Reprographics Company, LLC and American Reprographics Company in the State of California at any
time from October 21, 2006 through October 21, 2010, filed an action against us in the Superior
Court of California for the County of Orange. The complaint alleges, among other things, that we
violated the California Labor Code by failing to (i) provide meal and rest periods, or compensation
in lieu thereof, (ii) timely pay wages due at termination, and (iii) that those practices also
violate the California Business and Professions Code. The relief sought includes damages,
restitution, penalties, interest, costs, and attorneys fees and such other relief as the court
deems proper. We have not included any liability in our Consolidated Financial Statements in
connection with this matter. We cannot reasonably estimate the amount or range of possible loss, if
any, at this time.
In addition to the matter described above, we are involved in various additional legal proceedings
and other legal matters from time to time in the normal course of business. We do not believe that
the outcome of any of these matters will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our management prepares financial statements in conformity with GAAP. When we prepare these
financial statements, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those
related to accounts receivable, inventories, deferred tax assets, goodwill and intangible assets
and long-lived assets. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various
other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form
the basis for our judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not
readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions.
Goodwill Impairment
In connection with acquisitions, we apply the provisions of ASC 805, using the acquisition method
of accounting. The excess purchase price over the fair value of net tangible assets and
identifiable intangible assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.
We assess goodwill for impairment annually as of September 30, and more frequently if events and
circumstances indicate that goodwill might be impaired.
At September 30, 2011, we performed our annual goodwill impairment analysis, which indicated that
nine of our 37 reporting units, eight in the United States and one in Canada, had a goodwill
impairment as of September 30, 2011. Accordingly, we recorded a pretax, non-cash charge for the
three months ended September 30, 2011 to reduce the carrying value of goodwill by $42.1 million.
Given the increased uncertainty in the timing of the recovery of the construction industry, and the
increased uncertainty in the economy as a whole, as well as the significant decline in the price of
our Notes (resulting in a higher yield) and a decline of our stock price during the third quarter,
we concluded that it was appropriate to increase the estimated weighted average cost of capital
(WACC) of our reporting units as of September 30, 2011. The increase in our WACC
was the main driver in the decrease in the estimated fair value of reporting units during the third
quarter of 2011, which in turn resulted in the goodwill impairment.
41
Table of Contents
At June 30, 2011, we determined that there were sufficient indicators to trigger an interim
goodwill impairment analysis. The indicators included, among other factors: (1) the
economic environment, (2) the performance against plan of reporting units which previously had
goodwill impairment, and (3) revised forecasted future earnings. The results of our analysis
indicated that six of our 36 reporting units, all of which are located in the United States, had a
goodwill impairment as of June 30, 2011. Accordingly, we recorded a pretax, non-cash charge for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2011 to reduce the carrying value of goodwill by $23.3 million.
Goodwill impairment testing is performed at the reporting unit level. Goodwill is assigned to
reporting units at the date the goodwill is initially recorded. Once goodwill has been assigned to
reporting units, it no longer retains its association with a particular acquisition, and all of the
activities within a reporting unit, whether acquired or internally generated, are available to
support the value of the goodwill.
Goodwill impairment testing is a two-step process. Step one involves comparing the fair value of
our reporting units to their carrying amount. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit is greater
than zero and its fair value is greater than its carrying amount, there is no impairment. If the
reporting units carrying amount is greater than the fair value, the second step must be completed
to measure the amount of impairment, if any. Step two involves calculating the implied fair value
of goodwill by deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible assets, excluding goodwill,
of the reporting unit from the fair value of the reporting unit as determined in step one. The
implied fair value of goodwill determined in this step is compared to the carrying value of
goodwill. If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying value of goodwill, an
impairment loss is recognized equal to the difference.
We determine the fair value of our reporting units using an income approach. Under the income
approach, we determined fair value based on estimated discounted future cash flows of each
reporting unit. Determining the fair value of a reporting unit is judgmental in nature and requires
the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including revenue growth rates and EBITDA
margins, discount rates and future market conditions, among others. The estimated fair value of our
reporting units were based upon a projected EBITDA margin, which is anticipated to have a slight
increase from 2011 to 2012, followed by year over year increases of approximately 150 to 300 basis
points in 2013 through 2015, with stabilization expected in 2016. These projections are driven, in
part, by anticipated industry growth rates, anticipated GDP, customer composition and historical
performance. These cash flows are discounted using a weighted average cost of capital ranging from
14% to 16%, depending upon the size and risk profile of the reporting unit. We considered market
information in assessing the reasonableness of the fair value under the income approach described
above.
The results of step one of the goodwill impairment test, as of September 30, 2011, were as follows:
Reporting Number of |
Representing | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Units | Goodwill of | ||||||
No goodwill balance |
13 | $ | | |||||
Reporting units failing step one that continue to carry a goodwill balance |
9 | 76,990 | ||||||
Fair value of reporting unit exceeds its carrying value by 1% - 20% |
6 | 44,761 | ||||||
Fair value of reporting unit exceeds its carrying value by 20% - 40% |
2 | 42,447 | ||||||
Fair value of reporting unit exceeds its carrying value by more than 40% |
7 | 65,117 | ||||||
37 | $ | 229,315 | ||||||
Based upon a sensitivity analysis, a reduction of approximately 50 basis points of projected EBITDA
in 2011 and beyond, assuming all other assumptions remain constant, would result in one additional
reporting unit proceeding to step two of the analysis, and a further impairment of approximately
$8.0 million.
Based upon a separate sensitivity analysis, a 50 basis point increase to the weighted average cost
of capital would result in two additional reporting units proceeding to step two of the analysis,
and a further impairment of approximately $13.0 million.
Given the current economic environment and the uncertainties regarding the impact on our business,
there can be no assurance that the estimates and assumptions regarding the duration of the lack of
significant new construction activity in the AEC industry, or the period or strength of recovery,
made for purposes of our goodwill impairment testing as of September 30, 2011, will prove to be
accurate predictions of the future. If our assumptions regarding forecasted EBITDA of certain
reporting units are not achieved, we may be required to record additional goodwill impairment
charges in future periods, whether in connection with our next annual impairment testing in the
third quarter of 2012, or on an interim basis, if any such change constitutes a triggering event
outside of the quarter when we regularly perform our annual goodwill impairment test. It is not
possible at this time to determine if any such future impairment charge would result or, if it
does, whether such charge would be material.
42
Table of Contents
Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect temporary differences between the amount of assets and
liabilities for financial and tax reporting purposes. Such amounts are adjusted, as appropriate, to
reflect changes in tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse. A
valuation allowance is recorded to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely
than not to be realized. Changes in tax laws or accounting standards and methods may affect
recorded deferred taxes in future periods.
When establishing a valuation allowance, we consider future sources of taxable income such as
future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, future taxable income exclusive of
reversing temporary differences and carryforwards and tax planning strategies. A tax planning
strategy is an action that: is prudent and feasible; an enterprise ordinarily might not take, but
would take to prevent an operating loss or tax credit carryforward from expiring unused; and would
result in realization of deferred tax assets. In the event we determine the deferred tax assets,
more likely than not, will not be realized in the future, the valuation adjustment to the deferred
tax assets will be charged to earnings in the period in which we make such a determination. As of
September 30, 2011, we determined that cumulative losses for the preceding twelve quarters
constituted sufficient objective evidence (as defined by ASC 740-10) that a valuation allowance was
needed, and therefore established a $65.7 million valuation allowance against certain of its
deferred tax assets.
In future quarters we will evaluate our results to determine whether we will generate sufficient
taxable income to utilize our deferred tax assets, and whether a partial or full valuation
allowance will be required. Should we generate sufficient taxable income, however, we may reverse a
portion or all of the then current valuation allowance.
We calculate our current and deferred tax provision based on estimates and assumptions that could
differ from the actual results reflected in income tax returns filed in subsequent years.
Adjustments based on filed returns are recorded when identified.
Income taxes have not been provided on certain undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries
because such earnings are considered to be permanently reinvested.
The amount of taxable income or loss we report to the various tax jurisdictions is subject to
ongoing audits by federal, state and foreign tax authorities. Our estimate of the potential outcome
of any uncertain tax issue is subject to managements assessment of relevant risks, facts, and
circumstances existing at that time. We use a more-likely-than-not threshold for financial
statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax
return. We record a liability for the difference between the benefit recognized and measured and
tax position taken or expected to be taken on our tax return. To the extent that our assessment of
such tax positions changes, the change in estimate is recorded in the period in which the
determination is made. We report tax-related interest and penalties as a component of income tax
expense.
For further information regarding the accounting policies that we believe to be critical accounting
policies and that affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in preparing our interim
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements see our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, except for the
adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No.
2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task
Force, (ASU 2009-13), FASB ASU No. 2010-28, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, (ASU 2010-28) and
FASB ASU No. 2010-29, Business Combinations- Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for
Business Combinations, (ASU 2010-29) which are further described in Note 14, Recent Accounting
Pronouncements to our interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1, Description of Business and Basis of Presentation to our interim Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for disclosure on recent accounting pronouncements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our primary exposure to market risk is interest rate risk associated with our debt instruments. We
use both fixed and variable rate debt as sources of financing. Historically, we have entered into
derivative instruments to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates. These instruments allow
us to raise funds at floating rates and effectively swap them into fixed rates, without the
exchange of the underlying principal amount.
As of September 30, 2011, we had $238.6 million of total debt, net of discount, and capital lease
obligations, none of which bore interest at variable rates, except for the $9.8 million outstanding
on our domestic revolving credit facility.
We have not, and do not plan to, enter into any derivative financial instruments for trading or
speculative purposes. As of September 30, 2011, we had no other significant material exposure to
market risk, including foreign exchange risk and commodity risks.
43
Table of Contents
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act) are recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated
to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange
Act) as of September 30, 2011. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2011, our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes to our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended
September 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
This information is included under the caption Legal proceedings in Note 6, Commitments and Contingencies to our Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements in Part 1, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Information concerning certain risks and uncertainties appears in Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors of
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. You should carefully
consider those risks and uncertainties, which could materially affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations. There have been no material changes to the risk factors
disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
44
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Description | |||
31.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
|||
31.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
|||
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
|||
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
|||
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document * |
|||
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema * |
|||
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase * |
|||
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase * |
|||
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase * |
|||
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase * |
* | Filed herewith |
45
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: November 7, 2011
AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY |
||||
/s/ KUMARAKULASINGAM SURIYAKUMAR | ||||
Kumarakulasingam Suriyakumar | ||||
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
/s/ JOHN TOTH | ||||
John Toth | ||||
Chief Financial Officer |
46
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Description | |||
31.1 | Certification of Principal Executive Officer
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
|||
31.2 | Certification of Principal Financial Officer
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
|||
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
|||
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
|||
101.INS | XBRL Instance Document * |
|||
101.SCH | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema * |
|||
101.CAL | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase * |
|||
101.DEF | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase * |
|||
101.LAB | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase * |
|||
101.PRE | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase * |
* | Filed herewith |
47