ARC DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS, INC. - Quarter Report: 2011 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-32407
AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
Delaware | 20-1700361 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
1981 N. Broadway, Suite 385
Walnut Creek, California 94596
(925) 949-5100
Walnut Creek, California 94596
(925) 949-5100
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of Registrants principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ
As of August 2, 2011, there were 46,245,233 shares of the issuers common stock outstanding.
AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2011
Table of Contents
2
Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains statements that are forward-looking statements within
the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q, the words believe, expect, anticipate, estimate, intend, plan,
targets, likely, will, would, could, and variations of such words and similar expressions
as they relate to our management or to the Company are intended to identify forward-looking
statements. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those contemplated herein. We have described in Part II,
Item 1A-Risk Factors a number of factors that could cause our actual results to differ from our
projections or estimates. These factors and other risk factors described in this report are not
necessarily all of the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from
those expressed in any of our forward-looking statements. Other unknown or unpredictable factors
also could harm our results. Consequently, there can be no assurance that the actual results or
developments anticipated by us will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will
have the expected consequences to, or effects on, us. Given these uncertainties, you are cautioned
not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements.
Except where otherwise indicated, the statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are
made as of the date we filed this report with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
and should not be relied upon as of any subsequent date. All future written and verbal
forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly
qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section.
We undertake no obligation, and specifically disclaim any obligation, to publicly update or revise
any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
You should, however, consult further disclosures we make in future filings of our Annual Reports on
Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and Current Reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments
thereto, as well as our proxy statements.
3
Table of Contents
PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) (Unaudited) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 21,907 | $ | 26,293 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for accounts
receivable of $3,597 and $4,030 |
61,045 | 52,619 | ||||||
Inventories, net |
11,350 | 10,689 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 7,157 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses |
4,223 | 4,074 | ||||||
Other current assets |
20,775 | 6,870 | ||||||
Total current assets |
119,300 | 107,702 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of
$184,497 and $211,875 |
56,140 | 59,036 | ||||||
Goodwill |
271,424 | 294,759 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, net |
53,799 | 62,643 | ||||||
Deferred financing costs, net |
4,669 | 4,995 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
1,442 | 37,835 | ||||||
Other assets |
2,219 | 2,115 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 508,993 | $ | 569,085 | ||||
Liabilities and Equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 23,167 | $ | 23,593 | ||||
Accrued payroll and payroll-related expenses |
8,040 | 7,980 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
19,497 | 30,134 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt and capital leases |
32,365 | 23,608 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
83,069 | 85,315 | ||||||
Long-term debt and capital leases |
213,288 | 216,016 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
29,486 | | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
3,298 | 5,072 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
329,141 | 306,403 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6) |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
American Reprographics Company stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 25,000 shares authorized;
0 and 0 shares issued and outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 150,000 shares authorized;
46,215 and 46,183 shares issued, and 46,215 and 45,736 shares
outstanding |
46 | 46 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
99,396 | 96,251 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
77,477 | 173,459 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(3,219 | ) | (5,541 | ) | ||||
173,700 | 264,215 | |||||||
Less cost of common stock in treasury, 0 and 447 shares |
| 7,709 | ||||||
Total American Reprographics Company stockholders equity |
173,700 | 256,506 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest |
6,152 | 6,176 | ||||||
Total equity |
179,852 | 262,682 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 508,993 | $ | 569,085 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) (Unaudited) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Reprographics services |
$ | 70,460 | $ | 78,453 | $ | 140,482 | $ | 154,710 | ||||||||
Facilities management |
25,596 | 22,627 | 49,799 | 45,030 | ||||||||||||
Equipment and supplies sales |
13,534 | 14,008 | 25,813 | 27,509 | ||||||||||||
Total net sales |
109,590 | 115,088 | 216,094 | 227,249 | ||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
73,895 | 75,633 | 147,013 | 150,943 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
35,695 | 39,455 | 69,081 | 76,306 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
26,804 | 28,169 | 54,636 | 55,300 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
4,721 | 2,557 | 9,465 | 5,193 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
23,335 | | 23,335 | | ||||||||||||
(Loss) income from operations |
(19,165 | ) | 8,729 | (18,355 | ) | 15,813 | ||||||||||
Other income |
(35 | ) | (34 | ) | (61 | ) | (77 | ) | ||||||||
Interest expense, net |
7,699 | 5,754 | 15,866 | 11,642 | ||||||||||||
(Loss) income before income
tax provision |
(26,829 | ) | 3,009 | (34,160 | ) | 4,248 | ||||||||||
Income tax provision |
57,913 | 1,276 | 54,264 | 1,806 | ||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
(84,742 | ) | 1,733 | (88,424 | ) | 2,442 | ||||||||||
Loss (income) attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
112 | (54 | ) | 151 | (46 | ) | ||||||||||
Net (loss) income
attributable to American
Reprographics Company |
$ | (84,630 | ) | $ | 1,679 | $ | (88,273 | ) | $ | 2,396 | ||||||
(Loss) earnings per share
attributable to American
Reprographics Company
shareholders: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (1.87 | ) | $ | 0.04 | $ | (1.95 | ) | $ | 0.05 | ||||||
Diluted |
$ | (1.87 | ) | $ | 0.04 | $ | (1.95 | ) | $ | 0.05 | ||||||
Weighted average common shares
outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
45,360 | 45,196 | 45,341 | 45,174 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
45,360 | 45,512 | 45,341 | 45,422 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
American Reprographics Company Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Additional | Other | Common | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Par | Paid-in | Retained | Comprehensive | Stock in | Noncontrolling | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) (Unaudited) | Shares | Value | Capital | Earnings | Loss | Treasury | Interest | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
45,665 | $ | 46 | $ | 89,982 | $ | 200,961 | $ | (7,273 | ) | $ | (7,709 | ) | $ | 6,017 | $ | 282,024 | |||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
29 | | 2,918 | | | | | 2,918 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock
under Employee Stock Purchase
Plan |
5 | | 36 | | | | | 36 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised |
23 | | 125 | | | | | 125 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit from stock-based
compensation |
| | 21 | | | | | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 2,396 | | | 46 | 2,442 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency
translation adjustments |
| | | | 50 | | | 50 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loss on derivative, net
of tax effect |
| | | | (174 | ) | | | (174 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
2,318 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
45,722 | $ | 46 | $ | 93,082 | $ | 203,357 | $ | (7,397 | ) | $ | (7,709 | ) | $ | 6,063 | $ | 287,442 | |||||||||||||||
American Reprographics Company Shareholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Additional | Other | Common | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Par | Paid-in | Retained | Comprehensive | Stock in | Noncontrolling | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) (Unaudited) | Shares | Value | Capital | Earnings | Loss | Treasury | Interest | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31,
2010 |
45,736 | $ | 46 | $ | 96,251 | $ | 173,459 | $ | (5,541 | ) | $ | (7,709 | ) | $ | 6,176 | $ | 262,682 | |||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
459 | | 3,258 | | | | | 3,258 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock
under Employee Stock
Purchase Plan |
3 | | 20 | | | | | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised |
17 | | 108 | | | | | 108 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax deficiency from
stock-based compensation,
net of tax benefit |
| | (241 | ) | | | | | (241 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement of 447
treasury shares |
| | | (7,709 | ) | | 7,709 | | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | (88,273 | ) | | | (151 | ) | (88,424 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency
translation
adjustments |
| | | | 456 | | 127 | 583 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of
derivative, net of
tax effect |
| | | | 1,866 | | | 1,866 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss: |
(85,975 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2011 |
46,215 | $ | 46 | $ | 99,396 | $ | 77,477 | $ | (3,219 | ) | $ | | $ | 6,152 | $ | 179,852 | ||||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
(In thousands) (Unaudited) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (88,424 | ) | $ | 2,442 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
||||||||
Allowance for accounts receivable |
417 | 317 | ||||||
Depreciation |
15,187 | 17,571 | ||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
9,465 | 5,193 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
437 | 770 | ||||||
Amortization of bond discount |
267 | | ||||||
Goodwill impairment |
23,335 | | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
3,258 | 2,918 | ||||||
Excess tax benefit related to stock-based compensation |
(31 | ) | (38 | ) | ||||
Deferred income taxes |
8,515 | 164 | ||||||
Deferred tax valuation allowance |
64,340 | | ||||||
Amortization of derivative, net of tax effect |
1,866 | | ||||||
Other non-cash items, net |
(177 | ) | (314 | ) | ||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of
business acquisitions: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(8,705 | ) | (5,784 | ) | ||||
Inventory |
(1,048 | ) | (1,285 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
(14,047 | ) | (1,934 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses |
(2,782 | ) | 7,726 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
11,873 | 27,746 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(7,622 | ) | (2,777 | ) | ||||
Payment for swap transaction |
(9,729 | ) | | |||||
Other |
647 | 845 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(16,704 | ) | (1,932 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
108 | 125 | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock under Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
23 | 16 | ||||||
Excess tax benefit related to stock-based compensation |
31 | 38 | ||||||
Payments on long-term debt agreements and capital leases |
(14,101 | ) | (21,596 | ) | ||||
Net borrowings (repayments) under revolving credit facilities |
14,620 | (123 | ) | |||||
Payment of loan fees |
(541 | ) | | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
140 | (21,540 | ) | |||||
Effect of foreign currency translation on cash balances |
305 | 22 | ||||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
(4,386 | ) | 4,296 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
26,293 | 29,377 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 21,907 | $ | 33,673 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information |
||||||||
Noncash investing and financing activities |
||||||||
Noncash transactions include the following: |
||||||||
Capital lease obligations incurred |
$ | 5,453 | $ | 4,394 | ||||
Accrued liabilities in connection with the acquisition of businesses |
$ | | $ | 500 | ||||
Net loss on derivative, net of tax effect |
$ | | $ | (174 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Description of Business and Basis of Presentation
American Reprographics Company (ARC or the Company) is the largest reprographics company in the
United States providing business-to-business document management services primarily to the
architectural, engineering and construction (AEC) industry. ARC also provides these services to
companies in non-AEC industries, such as aerospace, technology, financial services, retail,
entertainment, and food and hospitality that require sophisticated document management services.
The Company conducts its operations through its wholly-owned operating subsidiary, American
Reprographics Company, L.L.C., a California limited liability company, and its subsidiaries.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim
financial information and in conformity with the requirements of the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC). As permitted under those rules, certain footnotes or other financial
information required by GAAP for complete financial statements have been condensed or omitted. In
managements opinion, the interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements presented herein
reflect all adjustments of a normal and recurring nature that are necessary to fairly present the
interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. All material intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The operating results for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for
the year ending December 31, 2011.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the interim Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements and accompanying notes. The Company evaluates its estimates and assumptions on
an ongoing basis and relies on historical experience and various other factors that it believes to
be reasonable under the circumstances to determine such estimates. Actual results could differ from
those estimates and such differences may be material to the interim Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
The Company reclassified certain amounts in the prior year financial statements to conform to the
current presentation. This reclassification had no effect on the Condensed Consolidated Statement
of Operations, as previously reported. The Company reclassified $4,074 from prepaid expenses and
other current assets at December 31, 2010, as a separate prepaid expenses caption, to
conform to the current presentation.
These interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and notes should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Companys 2010 Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update (ASU) 2010-29. The amendments in this update affect any public entity as defined by ASC
805, Business Combinations, that enters into business combinations that are material on an
individual or aggregate basis. The objective in this update is to address diversity in practice
about the interpretation of the pro forma revenue and earnings disclosure requirements for business
combinations. ASU 2010-29 is effective prospectively for business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after December 15, 2010. The Company adopted provisions of ASU 2010-29 effective January 1, 2011,
which did not have a material effect on its Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company has not
had any business combinations in 2011.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-28. This update provides amendments to the criteria of
ASC 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other. The amendments to this update affect all entities that
have recognized goodwill and have one or more reporting units whose carrying amount for purposes of
performing step one of the goodwill impairment test is zero or negative. ASU 2010-28 is effective
for financial statements issued for years beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not
permitted. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2010-28 effective January 1, 2011, which did
not have a material effect on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-13. This update provides amendments to the criteria of
ASC 605, Revenue Recognition, for separating consideration in multiple-deliverable arrangements.
The amendments to this update establish a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price
of a deliverable. ASU 2009-13 is effective for financial statements issued for years beginning on
or after June 15, 2010. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2010-06 effective January 1,
2011, which did not have a material effect on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
8
Table of Contents
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05. The new guidance eliminates the current option to report
other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in equity. Instead, an
entity will be required to present either a continuous statement of net income and other
comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The new guidance will be
effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2012 and will have presentation changes only.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04 which amends the accounting and disclosure requirements on
fair value measurements. The new guidance limits the highest-and-best-use measure to nonfinancial
assets, permits certain financial assets and liabilities with offsetting positions in market or
counterparty credit risks to be measured at a net basis, and provides guidance on the applicability
of premiums and discounts. Additionally, the new guidance expands the disclosures on Level 3 inputs
by requiring quantitative disclosure of the unobservable inputs and assumptions, as well as
description of the valuation processes and the sensitivity of the fair value to changes in
unobservable inputs. The new guidance will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2012.
Other than requiring additional disclosures, the Company does not anticipate material impacts to
its Consolidated Financial Statements upon adoption.
Segment Reporting
The provisions of ASC 280, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,
require public companies to report financial and descriptive information about their reportable
operating segments. The Company identifies operating segments based on the various business
activities that earn revenue and incur expense, whose operating results are reviewed by the chief
operating decision maker. Based on the fact that operating segments have similar products and
services, classes of customers, production processes and performance objectives, the Company is
deemed to operate as a single reportable segment.
Risk and Uncertainties
The Company generates the majority of its revenue from sales of products and services provided to
the AEC industry. As a result, the Companys operating results and financial condition can be
significantly affected by economic factors that influence the AEC industry, such as non-residential
and residential construction spending, GDP growth, interest rates, unemployment rates, office
vacancy rates, and government expenditures. The effects of the recent recession and current
economic environment in the United States have resulted in a significant downturn in the
non-residential and residential portions of the AEC industry. The AEC industry generally
experiences a downturn several months after a downturn in the general economy and there may be a
similar delay in the recovery of the AEC industry following a recovery in the general economy.
Similar to the AEC industry, the reprographics industry typically lags a recovery in the broader
economy. A prolonged downturn in the AEC industry and the reprographics industry would continue to
diminish demand for ARCs products and services, and would therefore negatively impact revenues and
have a material adverse impact on its business, operating results and financial condition.
2. Earnings per Share
The Company accounts for earnings per share in accordance with ASC 260, formerly SFAS No. 128,
Earnings per Share. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to ARC
by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per
share is computed similar to basic earnings per share except that the denominator is increased to
include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if common shares
subject to outstanding options and acquisition rights had been issued and if the additional common
shares were dilutive. Common stock equivalents are excluded from the computation if their effect is
anti-dilutive. Stock options for 2.2 million common shares for the three and six months ended June
30, 2011, were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income attributable to ARC per common
share because they were anti-dilutive. Stock options for 1.4 million common shares and 1.5 million
common shares for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, were excluded from
the calculation of diluted net income attributable to ARC per common share because they were
anti-dilutive.
Basic and diluted earnings per share were calculated using the following common shares for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average
common shares
outstanding during
the period basic |
45,360 | 45,196 | 45,341 | 45,174 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive
impact on equity
based compensation
awards |
| 316 | | 248 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average
common shares
outstanding during
the period diluted |
45,360 | 45,512 | 45,341 | 45,422 | ||||||||||||
9
Table of Contents
3. Goodwill and Other Intangibles Resulting from Business Acquisitions
Goodwill
In connection with acquisitions, the Company applies the provisions of ASC 805, using the
acquisition method of accounting. The excess purchase price over the fair value of net tangible
assets and identifiable intangible assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.
The Company assesses goodwill at least annually for impairment as of September 30 or more
frequently if events and circumstances indicate that goodwill might be impaired. At June 30, 2011,
the Company determined that there were sufficient indicators to trigger an interim goodwill
impairment analysis. The indicators included, among other factors: (1) the current economic
environment, (2) the performance against plan of reporting units which previously had goodwill
impairment, and (3) revised forecasted future earnings. The results of the Companys analysis
indicated that six of its reporting units, all of which are located in the United States, had a
goodwill impairment as of June 30, 2011. Accordingly, the Company recorded a pretax, non-cash
charge for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 to reduce the carrying value of goodwill by
$23.3 million.
Goodwill impairment testing is performed at the reporting unit level. Goodwill is assigned to
reporting units at the date the goodwill is initially recorded. Once goodwill has been assigned to
reporting units, it no longer retains its association with a particular acquisition, and all of the
activities within a reporting unit, whether acquired or internally generated, are available to
support the value of the goodwill.
Goodwill impairment testing is a two-step process. Step one involves comparing the fair value of
the reporting units to its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit is greater
than zero and its fair value is greater than its carrying amount, there is no impairment. If the
reporting units carrying amount is greater than the fair value, the second step must be completed
to measure the amount of impairment, if any. Step two involves calculating the implied fair value
of goodwill by deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible assets, excluding goodwill,
of the reporting unit from the fair value of the reporting unit as determined in step one. The
implied fair value of goodwill determined in this step is compared to the carrying value of
goodwill. If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying value of goodwill, an
impairment loss is recognized equal to the difference.
The Company determines the fair value of its reporting units using an income approach. Under the
income approach, the Company determined fair value based on estimated discounted future cash flows
of each reporting unit. The cash flows are discounted by an estimated weighted-average cost of
capital, which reflects the overall level of inherent risk of a reporting unit. Determining the
fair value of a reporting unit is judgmental in nature and requires the use of significant
estimates and assumptions, including revenue growth rates and EBITDA margins, discount rates and
future market conditions, among others. The Company considered market information in assessing the
reasonableness of the fair value under the income approach outlined above.
Given the current economic environment and the uncertainties regarding the impact on the Companys
business, there can be no assurance that the estimates and assumptions regarding the duration of
the lack of significant new construction activity in the AEC industry, or the period or strength of
recovery, made for purposes of the Companys goodwill impairment testing as of June 30, 2011, will
prove to be accurate predictions of the future. If the Companys assumptions regarding forecasted
EBITDA margins of certain reporting units are not achieved, the Company may be required to record
additional goodwill impairment charges in future periods, whether in connection with the Companys
next annual impairment testing in the third quarter of 2011, or following that, if any such change
constitutes a triggering event outside of the quarter when the Company regularly performs its
annual goodwill impairment test. It is not possible at this time to determine if any such future
impairment charge would result or, if it does, whether such charge would be material.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill from January 1, 2010 through June 30, 2011 are
summarized as follows:
Accumulated | Net | |||||||||||
Gross | Impairment | Carrying | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | Goodwill | Loss | Amount | |||||||||
January 1, 2010 |
$ | 405,054 | $ | 72,536 | $ | 332,518 | ||||||
Additions |
500 | | 500 | |||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
| 38,263 | (38,263 | ) | ||||||||
Translation adjustment |
4 | | 4 | |||||||||
December 31, 2010 |
405,558 | 110,799 | 294,759 | |||||||||
Additions |
| | | |||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
| 23,335 | (23,335 | ) | ||||||||
Translation adjustment |
| | | |||||||||
June 30, 2011 |
$ | 405,558 | $ | 134,134 | $ | 271,424 | ||||||
10
Table of Contents
The additions to goodwill include the excess purchase price over fair value of net assets acquired,
purchase price adjustments, and certain earnout payments.
Long-lived Assets
The Company periodically assesses potential impairments of its long-lived assets in accordance with
the provisions of ASC 360, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets. An
impairment review is performed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. The Company groups its assets at the lowest
level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of the other
assets and liabilities. The Company has determined that the lowest level for which identifiable
cash flows are available is the divisional level.
Factors considered by the Company include, but are not limited to, significant underperformance
relative to historical or projected operating results; significant changes in the manner of use of
the acquired assets or the strategy for the overall business; and significant negative industry or
economic trends. When the carrying value of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable based upon
the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment, the Company estimates the
future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual
disposition. If the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows and eventual disposition is
less than the carrying amount of the asset, the Company recognizes an impairment loss. An
impairment loss is reflected as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the
fair value of the asset, based on the fair value if available, or discounted cash flows, if not.
The reporting units of the Company have been negatively impacted by the decline in commercial and
residential construction. Before assessing the Companys goodwill for impairment, the Company
evaluated, as described above, the long-lived assets in its reporting units for impairment as of
June 30, 2011 given the reduced level of expected sales, profits and cash flows. Based on this
assessment, there was no impairment as of June 30, 2011.
Other intangible assets that have finite lives are amortized over their useful lives. Customer
relationships are amortized using the accelerated method, based on customer attrition rates, over
their estimated useful lives of 13 (weighted average) years.
During the fourth quarter of 2010, the Company decided to consolidate the various brands that
previously represented the Companys market presence around the country. Beginning in January 2011,
each of the Companys operating segments and their respective locations began to adopt ARC, the
Companys overall brand name. Original brand names will be used in conjunction with the new ARC
brand name to reinforce the Companys continuing presence in the business communities it serves,
and ongoing relationships with its customers. Accordingly, the remaining estimated useful lives of
the trade name intangible assets were revised down to 18 months. This change in estimate is
accounted for on a prospective basis, resulting in increased amortization expense over the revised
useful life of each trade name. The impact of this change in the three and six months ended June
30, 2011 was an increase in amortization expense of approximately $2.4 million and $4.7 million,
respectively. Trade names are amortized using the straight-line method. The latest the Company
expects to fully retire original trade names is April 2012.
Non-competition agreements are amortized over their term on a straight-line basis.
The following table sets forth the Companys other intangible assets resulting from business
acquisitions as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 which continue to be amortized:
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Net | Gross | Net | |||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Amount | Amortization | Amount | Amount | Amortization | Amount | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortizable other intangible
assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Customer relationships |
$ | 96,994 | $ | 52,538 | $ | 44,456 | $ | 96,359 | $ | 48,301 | $ | 48,058 | ||||||||||||
Trade names and trademarks |
20,309 | 10,983 | 9,326 | 20,294 | 5,736 | 14,558 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-competition agreements |
100 | 83 | 17 | 100 | 73 | 27 | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 117,403 | $ | 63,604 | $ | 53,799 | $ | 116,753 | $ | 54,110 | $ | 62,643 | |||||||||||||
11
Table of Contents
Based on current information, estimated future amortization expense of amortizable intangible
assets for the remainder of this fiscal year, each of the next four fiscal years and thereafter are
as follows:
(In thousands) | ||||
2011 |
$ | 9,245 | ||
2012 |
10,879 | |||
2013 |
6,465 | |||
2014 |
5,636 | |||
2015 |
5,105 | |||
Thereafter |
16,469 | |||
$ | 53,799 | |||
4. Income Taxes
On a quarterly basis, the Company estimates its effective tax rate for the full fiscal year and
records a quarterly income tax provision based on the anticipated rate in conjunction with the
recognition of any discrete items within the quarter.
The Companys effective income tax rate increased to 215.9% and 158.9% for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2011 from 42.4% and 42.5% for the same periods in 2010. The increase is primarily
due to the establishment of a $64.3 million non-cash valuation allowance against certain of the
Companys deferred tax assets during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, as discussed
below.
During the first quarter of 2011, the audit of the Companys 2008 federal income tax return by the
Internal Revenue Service was finalized and resulted in no adjustments. Due to this final result and
other pertinent factors, the Company derecognized its liability for an uncertain tax position of
$1.5 million and related accrued interest of $0.1 million.
In accordance with ASC 740-10, Income Taxes, the Company evaluates its deferred tax assets to
determine if a valuation allowance is required based on the consideration of all available evidence
using a more likely than not standard, with significant weight being given to evidence that can
be objectively verified. This assessment considers, among other matters, the nature, frequency and
severity of current and cumulative losses, forecasts of future profitability; the length of
statutory carryforward periods for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards; and available tax
planning alternatives. As of June 30, 2011, the Company determined that cumulative losses for the
preceding twelve quarters constituted sufficient objective evidence (as defined by ASC 740-10) that
a valuation allowance was needed, and therefore established a $64.3 million valuation allowance
against certain of its deferred tax assets.
Based on the Companys assessment, the remaining net deferred tax assets of $1.4 million as of June
30, 2011 are considered to be more likely than not to be realized. The valuation allowance of $64.3
million may be increased or decreased as conditions change or if the Company is unable to implement
certain available tax planning strategies. The realization of the Companys net deferred tax assets
ultimately depend on future taxable income, reversals of existing taxable temporary differences or
through a loss carry back. The Company currently has $74.9 million and $264 thousand of federal
taxable income available in 2008 and 2009, respectively, for carry back of federal tax losses
generated in 2010 and 2011, respectively. The Company has income tax receivables of $18.2 million
as of June 30, 2011 included in other current assets in its consolidated balance sheet primarily
relating to 2010 losses that will be carried back to 2008.
5. Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following:
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(In thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Borrowings from foreign revolving credit facility; 6.0% interest rate
at June 30, 2011 |
$ | 831 | $ | | ||||
Borrowings from a domestic revolving credit facility; 2.3% interest
rate at June 30, 2011 |
13,800 | | ||||||
10.5% Senior Notes due 2016, net of bond discount of $4,041 and $4,308 |
195,959 | 195,692 | ||||||
Various subordinated notes payable; weighted average interest rate of
6.2% and 6.2%; principal and interest payable monthly through
November 2013 |
3,949 | 8,635 | ||||||
Various capital leases; weighted average interest rate of 8.7% and
8.8%; principal and interest payable monthly through August 2016 |
31,114 | 35,297 | ||||||
245,653 | 239,624 | |||||||
Less current portion |
(32,365 | ) | (23,608 | ) | ||||
$ | 213,288 | $ | 216,016 | |||||
12
Table of Contents
10.5% Senior Notes due 2016
On December 1, 2010 (the Closing Date), the Company completed a private placement of 10.5% senior
unsecured notes due 2016 (the Notes).
The Notes have an aggregate principal amount of $200 million. The Notes are general unsecured
senior obligations of the Company and are subordinate to all existing and future senior secured
debt of the Company to the extent of the assets securing such debt. The Companys obligations under
the Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed by all of the Companys domestic subsidiaries. The
issue price was 97.824% with a yield to maturity of 11.0%. Interest on the Notes accrues at a rate
of 10.5% per annum and is payable semiannually in arrears on June 15 and December 15 of each year,
commencing on June 15, 2011. The Company will make each interest payment to the holders of record
of the Notes on the immediately preceding June 1 and December 1.
The Company received gross proceeds of $195.6 million from the Notes offering. In connection with
the issuance of the Notes, the Company entered into an indenture, dated as of the Closing Date (the
Indenture), among the Company, certain subsidiaries of the Company named therein, as guarantors
(the Guarantors), and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee; and a Registration
Rights Agreement, dated as of the Closing Date (the Registration Rights Agreement), among the
Company, the Guarantors, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as representatives
of the initial purchasers of the Notes (the Initial Purchasers). The Notes were offered only to
qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(the Securities Act), and outside the United States to non-U.S. persons pursuant to Regulation S
under the Securities Act.
Optional Redemption. At any time prior to December 15, 2013, the Company may redeem all or part of
the Notes upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days prior notice at a redemption price equal to
the sum of (i) 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus (ii) a make-whole premium as of the date
of redemption, plus (iii) accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption. In
addition, the Company may redeem some or all of the Notes on or after December 15, 2013, at
redemption prices set forth in the Indenture, together with accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to
the date of redemption. At any time prior to December 15, 2013, the Company may use the proceeds of
certain equity offerings to redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes,
including any permitted additional notes, at a redemption price equal to 110.5% of the principal
amount of the Notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption.
Repurchase upon Change of Control. Upon the occurrence of a change in control (as defined in the
Indenture), each holder of the Notes may require the Company to repurchase all of the
then-outstanding Notes in cash at a price equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount of the
Notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of repurchase.
Other Covenants. The Indenture contains covenants that limit, among other things, the Companys and
certain of its subsidiaries ability to (1) incur additional debt and issue preferred stock, (2)
make certain restricted payments, (3) consummate specified asset sales, (4) enter into certain
transactions with affiliates, (5) create liens, (6) declare or pay any dividend or make any other
distributions, (7) make certain investments, and (8) merge or consolidate with another person.
Events of Default. The Indenture provides for customary events of default (subject in certain cases
to customary grace and cure periods), which include non-payment, breach of covenants in the
Indenture, cross default and acceleration of other indebtedness, a failure to pay certain judgments
and certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency. Generally, if an event of default occurs, the
Trustee or holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the then outstanding Notes may declare
the principal of and accrued but unpaid interest on all of the then-outstanding Notes to be due and
payable.
Exchange Offer. Pursuant to a registered exchange offer in May 2011, the Company offered to
exchange up to $200 million aggregate principal amount of the Notes, for new notes that were
registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The terms of such registered notes are the
same as the terms of the Notes, except that they are now registered under the Securities Act and
the transfer restrictions, registration rights and additional interest provisions are not
applicable to the registered notes. The Company accepted the exchange of $200 million aggregate
principal amounts of the Notes that were properly tendered.
2010 Credit Agreement
On the Closing Date, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries also entered into a $50 million
credit agreement (the 2010 Credit Agreement) and paid off in full amounts outstanding under its
prior credit agreement.
The 2010 Credit Agreement provides for a $50 million senior secured revolving line of credit, of
which up to $20 million is available for the issuance of letters of credit. The line of credit is
available on a revolving basis during the period commencing after the Closing Date and ending on
December 1, 2015 and is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and certain of
its subsidiaries. Advances under the revolving line of credit are subject to customary borrowing
conditions, including the accuracy of representations and warranties and the absence of events of
default. The Company may borrow, partially or wholly repay its outstanding borrowings and reborrow,
subject to the terms and conditions contained in the 2010 Credit Agreement.
The Companys obligations under the 2010 Credit Agreement are guaranteed by its domestic
subsidiaries and, subject to certain exceptions, are
secured by security interests granted in all of the Companys and the domestic subsidiaries
personal and real property.
13
Table of Contents
Advances under the 2010 Credit Agreement bear interest at LIBOR plus the applicable rate. The
initial applicable rate is 2.00%. The applicable rate is determined based upon the consolidated
leverage ratio for the Company with a minimum and maximum applicable rate of 1.50% and 2.00%,
respectively. During the continuation of certain events of default, all amounts due under the 2010
Credit Agreement bear interest at 4.0% above the rate otherwise applicable. In addition, the
Company is required to pay an unused commitment fee on the average daily unused amount of the line
of credit at the applicable rate, calculated and payable quarterly in arrears, as follows: if the
consolidated leverage ratio is (i) greater than or equal to 3.00x, the unused commitment fee is
0.20%, (ii) less than or equal to 2.99x but greater than or equal to 2.00x, 0.15%, and (iii) less
than 2.00x, 0.10%.
The 2010 Credit Agreement contains the following financial covenants:
| Maximum consolidated leverage ratio as follows: |
| 4.35:1.00 for quarters ending December 31, 2010 through
September 30, 2011 |
||
| 4.25:1.00 for quarters ending December 31, 2011 through
September 30, 2012 |
||
| 4.15:1.00 for quarters ending December 31, 2012 through
September 30, 2013 |
||
| 4.00:1.00 for quarters ending December 31, 2013 through maturity; |
| Maximum consolidated senior secured debt leverage ratio not
greater than 1.50:1.00, determined on the last day of each
fiscal quarter through maturity; |
||
| Minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio as follows: |
| 1.70:1.00 for quarters ending December 31, 2010 through
September 30, 2011 |
||
| 1.75:1.00 for quarters ending December 31, 2011 through maturity; |
The 2010 Credit Agreement also contains covenants which, subject to certain exceptions as set forth
in the 2010 Credit Agreement, restrict the Companys ability to incur additional debt, grant liens
or guaranty other indebtedness, pay dividends, redeem stock, pay or redeem subordinated
indebtedness, make investments or capital expenditures, dispose or acquire assets, dispose of
equity interests in subsidiaries, enter into any merger, sale of assets, consolidation or
liquidation transaction, or engage in transactions with stockholders and affiliates. Covenants in
the 2010 Credit Agreement also require that the Company provide periodic financial reports to the
lender, observe certain practices and procedures with respect to the collateral pledged as
security, comply with applicable laws and maintain and preserve the Company and its subsidiaries
properties and maintain insurance.
As of June 30, 2011 the Company was in compliance with the financial incurrence-based covenants
under the Notes and financial maintenance-based covenants under the 2010 Credit Agreement. The
Companys trailing twelve months key financial covenant ratios under the 2010 Credit Agreement as
of June 30, 2011 were 1.82:1.00 for minimum interest coverage, 3.76:1.00 for maximum total leverage
and 0.69:1.00 for maximum senior secured leverage.
The Company expects to be in compliance with the financial covenants in the 2010 Credit Agreement
through the term of the agreement. However, it is possible that a default under certain financial
covenants may occur in the future, should the minimum required profitability levels not be
achieved. If the Company defaults on the covenants under the 2010 Credit Agreement and is unable to
obtain waivers from its lenders, the lenders will be able to exercise their rights and remedies
under the 2010 Credit Agreement, including a call provision on outstanding debt, which would have a
material adverse effect on the Companys business and financial condition.
As of June 30, 2011, standby letters of credit aggregated to $3.9 million. The standby letters of
credit and borrowings under the 2010 Credit Agreement reduced the Companys borrowing availability
under its 2010 Credit Agreement to $32.3 million.
Foreign Credit Facility
In the second quarter of 2011, in conjunction with its Chinese operations, UNIS Document Solutions
Co. Ltd. (UDS) entered into a one-year revolving credit facility. This facility provides for a
maximum credit amount of 8.0 million Chinese Yuan Renminbi. This translates to U.S. $1.2 million as
of June 30, 2011. Draws on the facility are limited to 30 day periods and incur a fee of 0.5% of
the amount drawn and no additional interest is charged.
14
Table of Contents
Interest Rate Swap Transaction
On December 19, 2007, the Company entered into an interest rate swap transaction (the Swap
Transaction) in order to hedge the floating interest rate risk on the Companys long term variable
rate debt. Under the terms of the Swap Transaction, the Company was required to make quarterly
fixed rate payments to the counterparty calculated based on an initial notional amount of $271.6
million at a fixed rate of 4.1375%, while the counterparty was obligated to make quarterly floating
rate payments to the Company based on the three month LIBOR. The notional amount of the Swap
Transaction was scheduled to decline over the term of the then existing term loan facility
consistent with the scheduled principal payments. The Swap Transaction had an effective date of
March 31, 2008 and an original termination date of December 6, 2012.
On October 2, 2009, the Company amended the Swap Transaction (the Amended Swap Transaction). The
Company entered into the Amended Swap Transaction in order to reduce the notional amount under the
initial Swap Transaction from $271.6 million to $210.8 million to hedge the Companys then-existing
variable interest rate debt under the Companys previous credit agreement.
In connection with the issuance of the Notes, the Amended Swap Transaction no longer qualified as a
cash flow hedge and was de-designated.
As of December 31, 2010, the Amended Swap Transaction had a negative fair value of $9.7 million,
all of which was recorded in accrued expenses. On January 3, 2011, the Amended Swap Transaction was
terminated and settled. For further information, see Note 9 Derivatives and Hedging Transactions.
6. Commitments and Contingencies
Operating Leases. The Company has entered into various non-cancelable operating leases primarily
related to facilities, equipment and vehicles used in the ordinary course of business.
Contingent Transaction Consideration. The Company is subject to earnout obligations entered into in
connection with prior acquisitions. If the acquired businesses generate sales and/or operating
profits in excess of predetermined targets, the Company is obligated to make additional cash
payments in accordance with the terms of such earnout obligations. As of June 30, 2011, the Company
has potential future earnout obligations for acquisitions consummated before the adoption of ASC
805 in the total amount of approximately $1.5 million through 2014 if predetermined financial
targets are met or exceeded. These earnout payments are recorded as additional purchase price (as
goodwill) when the contingent payments are earned and become payable.
Legal Proceedings. On October 21, 2010, a former employee, individually and on behalf of a
purported class consisting of all non-exempt employees who work or worked for American
Reprographics Company, LLC and American Reprographics Company in the State of California at any
time from October 21, 2006 through October 21, 2010, filed an action against the Company in the
Superior Court of California for the County of Orange. The complaint alleges, among other things,
that the Company violated the California Labor Code by failing to (i) provide meal and rest
periods, or compensation in lieu thereof, (ii) timely pay wages due at termination, and (iii) that
those practices also violate the California Business and Professions Code. The relief sought
includes damages, restitution, penalties, interest, costs, and attorneys fees and such other
relief as the court deems proper. The Company has not included any liability in its Consolidated
Financial Statements in connection with this matter. The Company cannot reasonably estimate the
amount or range of possible loss, if any, at this time.
In addition to the matter described above, the Company is involved in various additional legal
proceedings and other legal matters from time to time in the normal course of business. The Company
does not believe that the outcome of any of these matters will have a material adverse effect on
its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
7. Comprehensive Loss
The Companys comprehensive loss includes foreign currency translation adjustments and the
amortized fair value of the Amended Swap Transaction, net of taxes. The Amended Swap Transaction
was de-designated on December 1, 2010, as it no longer qualified as a cash flow hedge when the cash
proceeds from the issuance of the Notes were used to pay off the Companys previous credit
agreement. At that time, the fair value of the Amended Swap Transaction was computed and the
effective portion is stored in other comprehensive income and will be amortized into income, net of
tax effect, on the straight-line method, based on the original notional schedule.
15
Table of Contents
The differences between net (loss) income and comprehensive (loss) income attributable to ARC for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (84,742 | ) | $ | 1,733 | $ | (88,424 | ) | $ | 2,442 | ||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
294 | (66 | ) | 583 | 50 | |||||||||||
Gain (loss) on derivative, net of tax effect |
912 | 139 | 1,866 | (174 | ) | |||||||||||
Comprehensive (loss) income |
(83,536 | ) | 1,806 | (85,975 | ) | 2,318 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
17 | (54 | ) | 24 | (46 | ) | ||||||||||
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to
American Reprographics Company |
$ | (83,519 | ) | $ | 1,752 | $ | (85,951 | ) | $ | 2,272 | ||||||
Asset and liability accounts of foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars, the Companys
functional currency, at current rates. Revenues and expenses are translated at the weighted-average
currency rate for the fiscal period.
8. Stock-Based Compensation
The Company adopted the American Reprographics Company 2005 Stock Plan (the Stock Plan) in
February 2005. The Stock Plan provides for the grant of incentive and non-statutory stock options,
stock appreciation rights, restricted stock purchase awards, restricted stock awards, and
restricted stock units to employees, directors and consultants of the Company. The Stock Plan
authorizes the Company to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of common stock. This amount automatically
increased annually on the first day of the Companys fiscal year, from 2006 through and including
2010, by the lesser of (i) 1.0% of the Companys outstanding shares on the date of the increase;
(ii) 300,000 shares; or (iii) such smaller number of shares determined by the Companys board of
directors. As of June 30, 2011, 2,309,753 shares remain available for issuance under the Stock
Plan.
Stock options granted under the Stock Plan generally expire no later than ten years from the date
of grant. Options generally vest and become fully exercisable over a period of two to five years,
except that options granted to non-employee directors may vest over a shorter time period. The
exercise price of options must be equal to at least 100% (110% in the case of an incentive stock
option granted to a 10% stockholder) of the fair market value of the Companys common stock on the
date of grant. The Company allows for cashless exercises of vested outstanding options.
In February 2011, the Company granted options to acquire a total of 9,587 shares of the Companys
common stock to certain key employees with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the
Companys common stock on the date of grant. The stock options granted to those key employees vest
at a rate of 33 1/3% on each of the first three anniversaries from the date of grant and expire 10
years after the date of grant.
In March 2011, the Company granted an option to acquire 45,249 shares of the Companys common stock
to its Chief Operating Officer with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the
Companys common stock on the date of grant. The stock option granted to the Companys Chief
Operating Officer vests at a rate of 25% on each of the first four anniversaries from the date of
grant and expires 10 years after the date of grant. The Company also granted 1,444 shares of
restricted stock to its President and Chief Executive Officer at a price per share of $8.66, which
was the closing price of the Companys common stock on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on the
date the restricted stock was granted. The shares of restricted stock will vest at a rate of 25% on
each of the first four anniversaries from the date of grant.
In April 2011, the Company granted 15,000 shares of restricted stock to each of the Companys Chief
Accounting Officer and Chief Technology Officer at a price per share of $9.94 and $8.95,
respectively, which was the closing price of the Companys common stock on the NYSE on the date the
restricted stock was granted. The shares of restricted stock will vest at a rate of 25% on each of
the first four anniversaries of the date of grant. The Company also granted 404,000 shares of
restricted stock to certain key employees at a price per share of $8.77, which was the closing
price of the Companys common stock on the NYSE on the date the restricted stock was granted. The
shares of restricted stock will vest at a rate of 25% on each of the first four anniversaries from
the date of grant. In addition, the Company granted 5,587 shares of restricted stock to each of the
Companys six non-employee members of its Board of Directors at a price per share of $8.95, which
was the closing price of the Companys common stock on the NYSE on the date the restricted stock
was granted. The shares of restricted stock will vest on the one year anniversary from the date of
grant.
The impact of stock-based compensation on the interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, before income taxes, was $1.8 million
and $1.5 million, respectively.
The impact of stock-based compensation on the interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, before income taxes, was $3.3 million
and $2.9 million, respectively.
16
Table of Contents
As of June 30, 2011, total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock-based payments
totaled $5.6 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.5 years.
9. Derivatives and Hedging Transactions
As of June 30, 2011, the Company was not party to any derivative or hedging transactions.
As of December 31, 2010, the Company was party to the Amended Swap Transaction, in which the
Company exchanged its floating-rate payments for fixed-rate payments. As of December 1, 2010, the
Amended Swap Transaction was de-designated upon issuance of the Notes and payoff of the Companys
previous credit agreement. The Amended Swap Transaction no longer qualified as a cash flow hedge
under ASC 815, as all the floating-rate debt was extinguished. The Amended Swap Transaction
qualified as a cash flow hedge up to November 30, 2010. On January 3, 2011, the Company terminated
and settled the Amended Swap Transaction.
As of June 30, 2011, $6.2 million is deferred in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (AOCL) and
will be recognized in earnings over the remainder of the original term of the Amended Swap
Transaction which was scheduled to end in December 2012, but was terminated in January 2011. Over
the next 12 months, the Company will amortize $5.0 million from AOCL to interest expense.
The following table summarizes the fair value and classification on the interim Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets of the Amended Swap Transaction as of December 31, 2010:
Fair Value | ||||||||
Balance Sheet | December 31, | |||||||
(In thousands) | Classification | 2010 | ||||||
Derivative not designated as hedging instrument under ASC 815 |
||||||||
Amended Swap Transaction |
Accrued expenses | $ | 9,729 |
The following table summarizes the loss recognized in AOCL of derivatives, designated and
qualifying as cash flow hedges for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010:
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in | ||||||||
AOCL on Derivative | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||
(In thousands) | June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2010 | ||||||
Derivative in ASC 815 cash flow hedging relationship |
||||||||
Amended Swap Transaction |
$ | 222 | $ | (326 | ) | |||
Tax effect |
(83 | ) | 152 | |||||
Amended Swap Transaction, net of tax effect |
$ | 139 | $ | (174 | ) | |||
The following table summarizes the effect of the Amended Swap Transaction on the interim Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010:
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from AOCL into Income | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(effective portion) | (ineffective portion) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Location of Gain or
(Loss) Reclassified
from AOCL into
Income |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
$ | (1,457 | ) | $ | (1,968 | ) | $ | (2,980 | ) | $ | (3,934 | ) | $ | | $ | (34 | ) | $ | | $ | (106 | ) |
17
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the loss recognized in income of derivatives, not designated as
hedging instruments under ASC 815 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011:
Amount of Loss Recognized in Income on | ||||||||
Derivative | ||||||||
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||
(In thousands) | June 30, 2011 | June 30, 2011 | ||||||
Derivative not designated as hedging instrument under ASC 815 |
||||||||
Amended Swap Transaction |
$ | | $ | (120 | ) | |||
Tax effect |
| 45 | ||||||
Amended Swap Transaction, net of tax effect |
$ | | $ | (75 | ) | |||
10. Fair Value Measurements
In accordance with ASC 820, the Company has categorized its assets and liabilities that are
measured at fair value into a three-level fair value hierarchy as set forth below. If the inputs
used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the categorization is
based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels
of the hierarchy are defined as follows:
Level 1inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for
identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar
assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for
the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the
full term of the financial instrument.
Level 3inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant
to the fair value measurement.
The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the Companys financial
assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of December
31, 2010. As required by ASC 820, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety
based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Companys
assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires
judgment, and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement
within the fair value hierarchy levels.
Significant Other | ||||
Observable Inputs | ||||
Level 2 | ||||
(In thousands) | December 31, 2010 | |||
Recurring Fair Value Measure |
||||
Amended Swap Transaction |
$ | 9,729 |
The Company has also included additional required disclosures about the Companys Amended Swap
Transaction in Note 9 Derivatives and Hedging Transactions.
The Amended Swap Transaction is valued at fair value with the use of an income approach based on
current market interest rates using a discounted cash flow model and an adjustment for counterparty
risk. This model reflects the contractual terms of the derivative instrument, including the time to
maturity and debt repayment schedule, and market-based parameters such as interest rates and yield
curves. This model does not require significant judgment, and the inputs are observable. Thus, the
derivative instrument is classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. The Company
terminated and settled the Amended Swap Transaction on January 3, 2011.
18
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the bases used to measure certain assets and liabilities at fair
value on a nonrecurring basis in the consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2011:
Significant Other Unobservable Inputs | ||||||||
June 30, 2011 | ||||||||
(In thousands) | Level 3 | Total Losses | ||||||
Nonrecurring Fair Value Measure |
||||||||
Goodwill |
$ | 271,424 | $ | 23,335 |
In accordance with the provisions of ASC 350, goodwill was written down to its implied fair value
of $271.4 million as of June 30, 2011, resulting in an impairment charge of $23.3 million during
the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. See Note 3, Goodwill and Other Intangibles Resulting
from Business Acquisitions for further information regarding the process of determining the
implied fair value of goodwill.
Fair Values of Financial Instruments. The following methods and assumptions were used by the
Company in estimating the fair value of its financial instruments for disclosure purposes:
Cash equivalents: Cash equivalents are time deposits with maturity of three months or less when
purchased, which are highly liquid and readily convertible to cash. Cash equivalents reported in
the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets were $10.8 million as of June 30, 2011, and are carried
at cost and approximate fair value, due to the relatively short period to maturity of these
instruments.
Short- and long-term debt: The carrying amount of the Companys capital leases reported in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets approximates fair value based on the Companys current incremental
borrowing rate for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The carrying amount reported in the
Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2011 for its Notes is $200.0 million and $3.9
million for its subordinated notes payable. Using a discounted cash flow technique that
incorporates a market interest rate which assumes adjustments for duration, optionality, and risk
profile, the Company has determined the fair value of its Notes is $221.8 million as of June 30,
2011 and the fair value and for its subordinated notes payable is $3.8 million as of June 30, 2011.
Interest rate hedge agreements: The fair value of the interest rate swap is based on market
interest rates using a discounted cash flow model and an adjustment for counterparty risk.
11. Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements
The Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, on a joint and several basis, by all of the
Companys domestic subsidiaries (the Guarantor Subsidiaries). The Companys foreign subsidiaries
have not guaranteed the Notes (the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries). Each of the Guarantor
Subsidiaries is 100% owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company. There are no significant
restrictions on the ability of the Company to obtain funds from any of the Guarantor Subsidiaries
by dividends or loan. In lieu of providing separate audited financial statements for the Guarantor
Subsidiaries, condensed consolidating financial information is presented below.
19
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
June 30, 2011
June 30, 2011
American | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reprographics | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) (Unaudited) | Company | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Total | |||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | | $ | 9,527 | $ | 12,380 | $ | | $ | 21,907 | ||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
| 54,899 | 6,146 | | 61,045 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany operations |
295 | 4,529 | (4,824 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||
Inventories, net |
| 8,072 | 3,278 | | 11,350 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses |
33 | 3,235 | 955 | | 4,223 | |||||||||||||||
Other current assets |
| 19,825 | 950 | | 20,775 | |||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
328 | 100,087 | 18,885 | | 119,300 | |||||||||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
| 48,914 | 7,226 | | 56,140 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
| 271,424 | | | 271,424 | |||||||||||||||
Investment in subsidiaries |
186,373 | 12,725 | | (199,098 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Other intangible assets, net |
| 51,827 | 1,972 | | 53,799 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred financing costs, net |
4,669 | | | | 4,669 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| | 1,442 | | 1,442 | |||||||||||||||
Other assets |
| 1,938 | 281 | | 2,219 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 191,370 | $ | 486,915 | $ | 29,806 | $ | (199,098 | ) | $ | 508,993 | |||||||||
Liabilities and Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 45 | $ | 21,135 | $ | 1,987 | $ | | $ | 23,167 | ||||||||||
Accrued payroll and
payroll-related expenses |
| 7,752 | 288 | | 8,040 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses |
875 | 16,553 | 2,069 | | 19,497 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany loans |
(193,009 | ) | 191,487 | 1,522 | | | ||||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term
debt and capital leases |
13,800 | 16,841 | 1,724 | | 32,365 | |||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
(178,289 | ) | 253,768 | 7,590 | | 83,069 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt and capital leases |
195,959 | 15,793 | 1,536 | | 213,288 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 29,486 | | 29,486 | ||||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
| 1,495 | 1,803 | | 3,298 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
17,670 | 300,542 | 10,929 | | 329,141 | |||||||||||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total equity |
173,700 | 186,373 | 18,877 | (199,098 | ) | 179,852 | ||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and
equity |
$ | 191,370 | $ | 486,915 | $ | 29,806 | $ | (199,098 | ) | $ | 508,993 | |||||||||
20
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
December 31, 2010
December 31, 2010
American | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reprographics | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) (Unaudited) | Company | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Total | |||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | | $ | 12,587 | $ | 13,706 | $ | | $ | 26,293 | ||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
| 48,283 | 4,336 | | 52,619 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany operations |
295 | 2,717 | (3,012 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||
Inventories, net |
| 8,090 | 2,599 | | 10,689 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
| 7,157 | | | 7,157 | |||||||||||||||
Prepaid expenses |
72 | 2,799 | 1,203 | | 4,074 | |||||||||||||||
Other current assets |
| 5,942 | 928 | | 6,870 | |||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
367 | 87,575 | 19,760 | | 107,702 | |||||||||||||||
Property and equipment, net |
| 52,376 | 6,660 | | 59,036 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
| 294,759 | | | 294,759 | |||||||||||||||
Investment in subsidiaries |
257,838 | 16,065 | | (273,903 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Other intangible assets, net |
| 60,585 | 2,058 | | 62,643 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred financing costs, net |
4,995 | | | | 4,995 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
708 | 34,453 | 2,674 | | 37,835 | |||||||||||||||
Other assets |
| 1,978 | 137 | | 2,115 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 263,908 | $ | 547,791 | $ | 31,289 | $ | (273,903 | ) | $ | 569,085 | |||||||||
Liabilities and Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | | $ | 21,137 | $ | 2,456 | $ | | $ | 23,593 | ||||||||||
Accrued payroll and
payroll-related expenses |
| 7,643 | 337 | | 7,980 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses |
2,210 | 25,563 | 2,361 | | 30,134 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany loans |
(190,500 | ) | 190,241 | 259 | | | ||||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term
debt and capital leases |
| 22,787 | 821 | | 23,608 | |||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
(188,290 | ) | 267,371 | 6,234 | | 85,315 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt and capital leases |
195,692 | 19,201 | 1,123 | | 216,016 | |||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
| 3,381 | 1,691 | | 5,072 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
7,402 | 289,953 | 9,048 | | 306,403 | |||||||||||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total equity |
256,506 | 257,838 | 22,241 | (273,903 | ) | 262,682 | ||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and
equity |
$ | 263,908 | $ | 547,791 | $ | 31,289 | $ | (273,903 | ) | $ | 569,085 | |||||||||
21
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2011
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2011
American | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reprographics | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) (Unaudited) | Company | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Total | |||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | | $ | 99,106 | $ | 10,484 | $ | | $ | 109,590 | ||||||||||
Cost of sales |
| 65,315 | 8,580 | | 73,895 | |||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
| 33,791 | 1,904 | | 35,695 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
| 24,746 | 2,058 | | 26,804 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible
assets |
| 4,655 | 66 | | 4,721 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
| 23,335 | | | 23,335 | |||||||||||||||
Loss from operations |
| (18,945 | ) | (220 | ) | | (19,165 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other income |
| (35 | ) | | | (35 | ) | |||||||||||||
Interest expense (income), net |
5,602 | 2,114 | (17 | ) | | 7,699 | ||||||||||||||
Loss before equity
earnings of subsidiaries
and income tax provision |
(5,602 | ) | (21,024 | ) | (203 | ) | | (26,829 | ) | |||||||||||
Equity in earnings of
subsidiaries |
76,175 | 1,446 | | (77,621 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
2,853 | 53,705 | 1,355 | | 57,913 | |||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
(84,630 | ) | (76,175 | ) | (1,558 | ) | 77,621 | (84,742 | ) | |||||||||||
Loss attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
| | 112 | | 112 | |||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income
attributable to American
Reprographics Company |
$ | (84,630 | ) | $ | (76,175 | ) | $ | (1,446 | ) | $ | 77,621 | $ | (84,630 | ) | ||||||
22
Table of Contents
Consolidating Condensed Statement of Operations
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2010
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2010
American | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reprographics | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) (Unaudited) | Company | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Total | |||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | | $ | 106,504 | $ | 8,584 | $ | | $ | 115,088 | ||||||||||
Cost of sales |
| 69,136 | 6,497 | | 75,633 | |||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
| 37,368 | 2,087 | | 39,455 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
| 26,404 | 1,765 | | 28,169 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible
assets |
| 2,484 | 73 | | 2,557 | |||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
| 8,480 | 249 | | 8,729 | |||||||||||||||
Other income, net |
| (34 | ) | | | (34 | ) | |||||||||||||
Interest expense (income), net |
| 5,757 | (3 | ) | | 5,754 | ||||||||||||||
Income before equity
earnings of subsidiaries
and income tax provision |
| 2,757 | 252 | | 3,009 | |||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of
subsidiaries |
(1,679 | ) | (141 | ) | | 1,820 | | |||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
| 1,219 | 57 | | 1,276 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
1,679 | 1,679 | 195 | (1,820 | ) | 1,733 | ||||||||||||||
Income attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
| | (54 | ) | | (54 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
attributable to American
Reprographics Company |
$ | 1,679 | $ | 1,679 | $ | 141 | $ | (1,820 | ) | $ | 1,679 | |||||||||
23
Table of Contents
Consolidating Condensed Statement of Operations
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2011
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2011
American | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reprographics | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) (Unaudited) | Company | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Total | |||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | | $ | 197,096 | $ | 18,998 | $ | | $ | 216,094 | ||||||||||
Cost of sales |
| 131,930 | 15,083 | | 147,013 | |||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
| 65,166 | 3,915 | | 69,081 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
| 50,573 | 4,063 | | 54,636 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible
assets |
| 9,333 | 132 | | 9,465 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
| 23,335 | | | 23,335 | |||||||||||||||
Loss from operations |
| (18,075 | ) | (280 | ) | | (18,355 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other income |
| (61 | ) | | | (61 | ) | |||||||||||||
Interest expense (income), net |
11,342 | 4,556 | (32 | ) | | 15,866 | ||||||||||||||
Loss before equity
earnings of subsidiaries
and income tax provision |
(11,342 | ) | (22,570 | ) | (248 | ) | | (34,160 | ) | |||||||||||
Equity in earnings of
subsidiaries |
76,225 | 1,444 | | (77,669 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
706 | 52,211 | 1,347 | | 54,264 | |||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
(88,273 | ) | (76,225 | ) | (1,595 | ) | 77,669 | (88,424 | ) | |||||||||||
Loss attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
| | 151 | | 151 | |||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income
attributable to American
Reprographics Company |
$ | (88,273 | ) | $ | (76,225 | ) | $ | (1,444 | ) | $ | 77,669 | $ | (88,273 | ) | ||||||
24
Table of Contents
Consolidating Condensed Statement of Operations
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2010
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2010
American | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reprographics | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) (Unaudited) | Company | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Total | |||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | | $ | 210,593 | $ | 16,656 | $ | | $ | 227,249 | ||||||||||
Cost of sales |
| 138,160 | 12,783 | | 150,943 | |||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
| 72,433 | 3,873 | | 76,306 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
| 51,831 | 3,469 | | 55,300 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible
assets |
| 5,049 | 144 | | 5,193 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Income from operations |
| 15,553 | 260 | | 15,813 | |||||||||||||||
Other income, net |
| (77 | ) | | | (77 | ) | |||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
| 11,638 | 4 | | 11,642 | |||||||||||||||
Income before equity
earnings of
subsidiaries and
income tax provision |
| 3,992 | 256 | | 4,248 | |||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of
subsidiaries |
(2,396 | ) | (141 | ) | | 2,537 | | |||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
| 1,737 | 69 | | 1,806 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
2,396 | 2,396 | 187 | (2,537 | ) | 2,442 | ||||||||||||||
Income attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
| | (46 | ) | | (46 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss)
attributable to
American
Reprographics Company |
$ | 2,396 | $ | 2,396 | $ | 141 | $ | (2,537 | ) | $ | 2,396 | |||||||||
25
Table of Contents
Consolidating Condensed Statement of Cash Flows
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2011
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2011
American | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reprographics | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) (Unaudited) | Company | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Total | |||||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating
activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash (used in) provided
by operating activities |
$ | (10,750 | ) | $ | 22,939 | $ | (316 | ) | $ | | $ | 11,873 | ||||||||
Cash flows from investing
activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
| (6,968 | ) | (654 | ) | | (7,622 | ) | ||||||||||||
Payment for swap transaction |
| (9,729 | ) | | | (9,729 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other |
| 803 | (156 | ) | | 647 | ||||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing
activities |
| (15,894 | ) | (810 | ) | | (16,704 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash flows from financing
activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from stock option
exercises |
| 108 | | | 108 | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of
common stock under Employee
Stock Purchase Plan |
| 23 | | | 23 | |||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefit related
to stock-based compensation |
| 31 | | | 31 | |||||||||||||||
Payments on long-term debt
agreements and capital
leases |
| (13,325 | ) | (776 | ) | | (14,101 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net borrowings under
revolving credit facilities |
13,800 | | 820 | | 14,620 | |||||||||||||||
Payment of deferred loan fees |
(541 | ) | | | | (541 | ) | |||||||||||||
Advances to/from subsidiaries |
(2,509 | ) | 3,058 | (549 | ) | | - | |||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used
in) financing activities |
10,750 | (10,105 | ) | (505 | ) | | 140 | |||||||||||||
Effect of foreign currency
translation on cash balances |
| | 305 | | 305 | |||||||||||||||
Net change in cash and cash
equivalents |
| (3,060 | ) | (1,326 | ) | | (4,386 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period |
| 12,587 | 13,706 | | 26,293 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at
end of period |
$ | | $ | 9,527 | $ | 12,380 | $ | | $ | 21,907 | ||||||||||
26
Table of Contents
Consolidating Condensed Statement of Cash Flows
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2010
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2010
American | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reprographics | Guarantor | Non-Guarantor | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) (Unaudited) | Company | Subsidiaries | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Total | |||||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating
activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by
operating activities |
$ | | $ | 27,427 | $ | 319 | $ | | $ | 27,746 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from investing
activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
| (2,349 | ) | (428 | ) | | (2,777 | ) | ||||||||||||
Payment for swap transaction |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Other |
| 811 | 34 | | 845 | |||||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing
activities |
| (1,538 | ) | (394 | ) | | (1,932 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash flows from financing
activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from stock option
exercises |
| 125 | | | 125 | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of
common stock under Employee
Stock Purchase Plan |
| 16 | | | 16 | |||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefit related
to stock-based compensation |
| 38 | | | 38 | |||||||||||||||
Payments on long-term debt
agreements and capital
leases |
| (20,947 | ) | (649 | ) | | (21,596 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net repayments under
revolving credit facility |
| | (123 | ) | | (123 | ) | |||||||||||||
Payment of loan fees |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Advances to/from subsidiaries |
| 573 | (573 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||
Net cash used in financing
activities |
| (20,195 | ) | (1,345 | ) | | (21,540 | ) | ||||||||||||
Effect of foreign currency
translation on cash balances |
| | 22 | | 22 | |||||||||||||||
Net change in cash and cash
equivalents |
| 5,694 | (1,398 | ) | | 4,296 | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at
beginning of period |
| 15,319 | 14,058 | | 29,377 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at
end of period |
$ | | $ | 21,013 | $ | 12,660 | $ | | $ | 33,673 | ||||||||||
27
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our interim Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements and the related notes and other financial information appearing elsewhere in
this report as well as Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations included in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the first quarter of fiscal year 2011.
Executive Summary
American Reprographics Company (ARC, the Company, we or us) is the largest reprographics
company in the United States. We provide business-to-business document management services
primarily to the architectural, engineering and construction (AEC) industry, through a nationwide
network of service centers.
We also serve a variety of clients and businesses outside the AEC industry in need of sophisticated
document management services similar to our core AEC offerings.
Our services apply to time-sensitive and graphic-intensive documents and fall into four primary
categories:
| Document management. Document management involves storing,
tracking and providing authorized access to documents we
maintain on our customers behalf. This is largely
accomplished through digital database management as
documents enter our digital infrastructure and are
maintained on our production workstations, servers and
networks. |
||
| Document distribution and logistics. Document distribution
and logistics involves transferring digital documents
throughout our local and wide-area computer networks, and
over the internet, as well as the pickup, delivery and
shipping of hardcopy documents to and from locations around
the world. |
||
| Print-on-demand. Print-on-demand involves quick-turnaround
digital printing in black and white and color, and in a
wide variety of sizes and formats. |
||
| Facilities management. On-site services, frequently
referred to as FMs, is any combination of the above
services supplied at a customers location. On-site
services involve placing equipment, technology
applications, and sometimes staff in our customers
location to provide convenience printing and other
reprographics services. Our FM service offering is evolving
to include the management of entire print networks in our
customers offices, which we refer to as managed print
services or MPS. |
We deliver these services through our specialized technology, more than 550 sales and customer
service employees, and more than 5,800 on-site services facilities at our customers locations. All
of our local service centers are connected by a digital infrastructure, allowing us to deliver
services, products, and value to more than 120,000 U.S. customers who purchased goods and services
from us in the past 24 months.
In the past, industry conventions led us to maintain acquired brands wherever practical due to the
local nature of construction activity. Therefore, historically, our operating segments functioned
under local brand names. Each brand name typically represents a business or group of businesses
that has been acquired by us. Over the past several years, however, many large construction
companies have grown through mergers and acquisitions, creating a market in which we believe that
regional or national service providers have a greater marketing advantage. Beginning in January
2011, each of our operating segments and their respective locations began to adopt the acronym
ARC. This single brand will highlight the scope and scale of our services, which we believe will
offer certain business advantages with respect to our customers that have a national presence.
Original brand names will continue to be used in conjunction with the single ARC brand to reinforce
our continuing presence in the business communities we serve, and ongoing relationships with our
customers. The latest date we expect to fully retire original trade names is April 2012.
A significant component of our historical growth has been from acquisitions. Acquisition activity
has not been a meaningful part of our 2011 and 2010 operations due to the potential risks inherent
in an economy recovering from a recession. In 2010, we acquired one Chinese business acquisition
through UNIS Document Solutions Co. Ltd., (UDS), our business venture with Unisplendour
Corporation Limited (Unisplendour) for $0.6 million.
Evaluating our Performance. We believe we are able to deliver value to our stockholders by:
| Creating consistent, profitable growth, or in the absence of growth due to market conditions beyond our control,
margins superior to commonly understood industry benchmarks; |
||
| Maintaining our industry leadership position as measured by our geographical footprint, market share and revenue
generation capabilities; |
28
Table of Contents
| Continuing to develop and invest in our products, services, and technology to meet the changing needs of our customers; |
||
| Maintaining a low cost structure; and |
||
| Maintaining a flexible capital structure that provides for both responsible debt service and pursuit of acquisitions
and other high-return investments. |
Primary Financial Measures. We use, among other measurements, net sales, costs and expenses,
earnings before taxes (EBT), earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT), earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) and operating cash flow to assess the
performance of our business.
We identify operating segments based on the various business activities that earn revenue and incur
expense, whose operating results are reviewed by the chief operating decision maker. Because our
operating segments have similar products and services, classes of customers, production processes
and economic characteristics, we are deemed to operate as a single reportable segment.
Please refer to our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information regarding our primary
financial measures.
Other Common Financial Measures. We also use a variety of other common financial measures as
indicators of our performance, including:
| Net income and earnings per share; |
||
| Material and labor costs as a percentage of net sales; |
||
| Days sales outstanding/days sales inventory/days payable
outstanding; and |
||
| Cash flows from operations. |
We evaluate these and other financial measures on a consolidated basis to evaluate corporate trends
and performance. In addition, we monitor some of these measures on a daily basis and operating
segment by operating segment through use of our proprietary Company intranet and reporting tools.
Our corporate operations staff also conducts a monthly variance analysis on the income statement,
balance sheet, and cash flows of each operating segment.
We believe from a current customer segment mix perspective, approximately 77% of revenue is derived
from the AEC industry, and 23% is derived from non-AEC sources. We believe that non-AEC sources of
revenue currently offer more attractive revenue opportunities in light of current credit and
spending constraints affecting the AEC industry, therefore, we plan to increasingly focus our
business on the non-AEC industry.
Not all of these financial measurements are represented directly on our Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements, but meaningful discussions of each are part of our quarterly disclosures and
presentations to the investment community.
Acquisitions. Our disciplined approach to complementary acquisitions in the past has led us to
acquire reprographics businesses that (1) fit our profile for performance potential, (2) can be
acquired for a price that fits our parameters, and (3) meet our strategic criteria for gaining
market share.
None of our individual acquisitions in the past three years have added a material percentage of
sales to our overall business. In the aggregate, however, our acquisitions have fueled the bulk of
our historical annual sales growth. Acquisition activity has not been a meaningful part of our 2011
and 2010 operations due to the potential risks of such activity inherent in an economy recovering
from a recession. See Note 3 Goodwill and Other Intangibles Resulting from Business Acquisitions
to our interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
Economic Factors Affecting Financial Performance.
Based on a compilation of approximately 90% of revenues from our operating segments and certain
assumptions derived from data relating to AEC and non-AEC customers, we estimate that sales to the
AEC industry accounted for 77% of our net sales for the period ended June 30, 2011, with the
remaining 23% consisting of sales to non-AEC industries. As a result, our operating results and
financial condition is significantly affected by economic factors that influence the AEC industry,
such as the availability of commercial credit at reasonably attractive rates, non-residential and
residential construction spending, GDP growth, interest rates, unemployment rates, commercial
vacancy rates, and government expenditures. The effects of the current economic environment in the
United States, and weakness in global economic conditions, have resulted in a significant reduction
of activity in the non-residential and residential portions of the AEC industry, which in turn, has
produced a decline in our revenues over the past two years. We believe that the AEC industry
generally experiences downturns several months after a downturn in the general economy and that
there may be a similar delay in the recovery of the AEC industry following a recovery in the
general economy. Similar to the AEC industry, the reprographics industry typically lags a recovery
in the broader economy.
29
Table of Contents
Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
EBIT, EBITDA and related ratios presented in this report are supplemental measures of our
performance that are not required by or presented in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). These measures are not measurements of
our financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to net income,
income from operations, or any other performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP, or as an
alternative to cash flows from operating, investing or financing activities as a measure of our
liquidity.
EBIT represents net income before interest and taxes. EBITDA represents net income before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization. Amortization does not include $1.8 million and $3.3 million
of stock-based compensation expense recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses, for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. Amortization does not include $1.5
million and $2.9 million of stock-based compensation expense recorded in selling, general and
administrative expenses, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. EBIT
margin is a non-GAAP measure calculated by dividing EBIT by net sales. EBITDA margin is a non-GAAP
measure calculated by dividing EBITDA by net sales.
We present EBIT, EBITDA and related ratios because we consider them important supplemental measures
of our performance and liquidity. We believe investors may also find these measures meaningful,
given how our management makes use of them. The following is a discussion of our use of these
measures.
We use EBIT and EBITDA to measure and compare the performance of our operating segments. Our
operating segments financial performance includes all of the operating activities except debt and
taxation which are managed at the corporate level for U.S. operating segments. As a result, EBIT is
the best measure of operating segment profitability and the most useful metric by which to measure
and compare the performance of our operating segments. We also use EBIT to measure performance for
determining operating segment-level compensation and we use EBITDA to measure performance for
determining consolidated-level compensation. In addition, we use EBIT and EBITDA to evaluate
potential acquisitions and potential capital expenditures.
EBIT, EBITDA and related ratios have limitations as analytical tools, and should not be considered
in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these
limitations are as follows:
| They do not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements for capital expenditures and contractual commitments; |
||
| They do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs; |
||
| They do not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary, to service interest or
principal payments on our debt; |
||
| Although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often
have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA does not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements; and |
||
| Other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate these measures differently than we do, limiting
their usefulness as comparative measures. |
Because of these limitations, EBIT, EBITDA, and related ratios should not be considered as measures
of discretionary cash available to us to invest in business growth or to reduce our indebtedness.
We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using EBIT, EBITDA
and related ratios only as supplements.
Our presentation of adjusted net income and adjusted EBITDA over certain periods is an attempt to
provide meaningful comparisons to our historical performance for our existing and future investors.
The unprecedented changes in our end markets over the past several years have required us to take
measures that are unique in our history and specific to individual circumstances. Comparisons
inclusive of these actions make normal financial and other performance patterns difficult to
discern under a strict GAAP presentation. Each non-GAAP presentation, however, is explained in
detail in the reconciliation tables below.
Specifically,
we have presented adjusted net income (loss) attributable to ARC and
adjusted earnings (loss) per
share attributable to ARC shareholders for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 to reflect
the exclusion of the goodwill impairment charge, amortization impact
related to the change in useful lives of trade
names, interest rate swap related costs, the valuation allowance related to certain deferred tax assets
and other discrete tax items. This presentation facilitates a meaningful comparison of our
operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010. We believe these
charges were the result of the current macroeconomic environment, our capital restructuring, or
other items which are not indicative of our actual operating performance.
30
Table of Contents
We presented adjusted EBITDA in the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 to exclude the
non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $23.3 million (which was taken at the end of the second
quarter), and stock-based compensation expense of $1.8 million and $3.3 million, respectively. We
presented adjusted EBITDA in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 to exclude stock-based
compensation expense of
$1.5 million and $2.9 million, respectively. We believe that the goodwill impairment charge was a
result of the current macroeconomic environment and not indicative of our operations. The exclusion
of the goodwill impairment charges and stock-based compensation expense to arrive at adjusted
EBITDA is consistent with the definition of adjusted EBITDA in our previous and current credit
agreements; therefore, we believe this information is useful to investors in assessing our ability
to meet our debt covenants.
The following is a reconciliation of cash flows provided by operating activities to EBIT, EBITDA,
and net (loss) income attributable to ARC:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Cash flows provided by operating activities |
$ | 7,284 | $ | 18,278 | $ | 11,873 | $ | 27,746 | ||||||||
Changes in operating assets and
liabilities, net of effect of
business acquisitions |
17,216 | (3,806 | ) | 26,582 | 1,277 | |||||||||||
Non-cash (expenses) income, including
depreciation and amortization |
(109,242 | ) | (12,739 | ) | (126,879 | ) | (26,581 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax provision |
57,913 | 1,276 | 54,264 | 1,806 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
7,699 | 5,754 | 15,866 | 11,642 | ||||||||||||
Loss (income) attributable to the
noncontrolling interest |
112 | (54 | ) | 151 | (46 | ) | ||||||||||
EBIT |
(19,018 | ) | 8,709 | (18,143 | ) | 15,844 | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
12,166 | 11,108 | 24,652 | 22,764 | ||||||||||||
EBITDA |
(6,852 | ) | 19,817 | 6,509 | 38,608 | |||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
(7,699 | ) | (5,754 | ) | (15,866 | ) | (11,642 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax provision |
(57,913 | ) | (1,276 | ) | (54,264 | ) | (1,806 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(12,166 | ) | (11,108 | ) | (24,652 | ) | (22,764 | ) | ||||||||
Net (loss) income attributable to ARC |
$ | (84,630 | ) | $ | 1,679 | $ | (88,273 | ) | $ | 2,396 | ||||||
31
Table of Contents
The following is a reconciliation of net (loss) income attributable to ARC to EBIT, EBITDA and
adjusted EBITDA:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Net (loss) income attributable to ARC |
$ | (84,630 | ) | $ | 1,679 | $ | (88,273 | ) | $ | 2,396 | ||||||
Interest expense, net |
7,699 | 5,754 | 15,866 | 11,642 | ||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
57,913 | 1,276 | 54,264 | 1,806 | ||||||||||||
EBIT |
(19,018 | ) | 8,709 | (18,143 | ) | 15,844 | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
12,166 | 11,108 | 24,652 | 22,764 | ||||||||||||
EBITDA |
(6,852 | ) | 19,817 | 6,509 | 38,608 | |||||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
23,335 | | 23,335 | | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
1,769 | 1,457 | 3,258 | 2,918 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 18,252 | $ | 21,274 | $ | 33,102 | $ | 41,526 | ||||||||
The following is a reconciliation of net (loss) income margin attributable to ARC to EBIT margin,
EBITDA margin and adjusted EBITDA margin:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011(1) | 2010(1) | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net (loss) income margin attributable to ARC |
(77.2 | )% | 1.5 | % | (40.8 | )% | 1.1 | % | ||||||||
Interest expense, net |
7.0 | 5.0 | 7.3 | 5.1 | ||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
52.8 | 1.1 | 25.1 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||
EBIT margin |
(17.4 | ) | 7.6 | (8.4 | ) | 7.0 | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
11.1 | 9.7 | 11.4 | 10.0 | ||||||||||||
EBITDA margin |
(6.3 | ) | 17.2 | 3.0 | 17.0 | |||||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
21.3 | | 10.8 | | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
1.6 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.3 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA margin |
16.7 | % | 18.5 | % | 15.3 | % | 18.3 | % | ||||||||
(1) | Column does not foot due to rounding |
32
Table of Contents
The following is a reconciliation of net (loss) income attributable to ARC to unaudited adjusted
net income (loss) attributable to ARC and earnings per share to adjusted earnings per share:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Net (loss) income attributable to ARC |
$ | (84,630 | ) | $ | 1,679 | $ | (88,273 | ) | $ | 2,396 | ||||||
Goodwill impairment |
23,335 | | 23,335 | | ||||||||||||
Change in trade name impact to amortization |
2,369 | | 4,738 | | ||||||||||||
Interest rate swap related costs |
1,457 | | 2,980 | | ||||||||||||
Income tax benefit related to above items |
(6,497 | ) | | (7,879 | ) | | ||||||||||
Deferred tax valuation allowance and other
discrete tax items |
64,186 | | 63,208 | | ||||||||||||
Unaudited adjusted net income (loss)
attributable to ARC |
$ | 220 | $ | 1,679 | $ | (1,891 | ) | $ | 2,396 | |||||||
Actual: |
||||||||||||||||
(Loss) earnings per share attributable to ARC
shareholders: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (1.87 | ) | $ | 0.04 | $ | (1.95 | ) | $ | 0.05 | ||||||
Diluted |
$ | (1.87 | ) | $ | 0.04 | $ | (1.95 | ) | $ | 0.05 | ||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
45,360 | 45,196 | 45,341 | 45,174 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
45,360 | 45,512 | 45,341 | 45,422 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted: |
||||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to ARC
shareholders: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.04 | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 0.05 | |||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.00 | $ | 0.04 | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 0.05 | |||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
45,360 | 45,196 | 45,341 | 45,174 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
45,696 | 45,512 | 45,341 | 45,422 |
33
Table of Contents
Results of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
The following table provides information on the percentages of certain items of selected financial
data compared to net sales for the periods indicated:
As Percentage of Net Sales | As Percentage of Net Sales | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Net Sales |
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
67.4 | 65.7 | 68.0 | 66.4 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
32.6 | 34.3 | 32.0 | 33.6 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
24.5 | 24.5 | 25.3 | 24.3 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
4.3 | 2.2 | 4.4 | 2.3 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
21.3 | | 10.8 | | ||||||||||||
(Loss) income from operations |
(17.5 | ) | 7.6 | (8.5 | ) | 7.0 | ||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
7.0 | 5.0 | 7.3 | 5.1 | ||||||||||||
(Loss) income before income tax provision |
(24.5 | ) | 2.6 | (15.8 | ) | 1.9 | ||||||||||
Income tax provision |
52.8 | 1.1 | 25.1 | 0.8 | ||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
(77.3 | ) | 1.5 | (40.9 | ) | 1.1 | ||||||||||
Loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest |
0.1 | | 0.1 | | ||||||||||||
Net (loss) income attributable to ARC |
(77.2 | )% | 1.5 | % | (40.8 | )% | 1.1 | % | ||||||||
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Increase (decrease) | Ended June 30, | Increase (decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions, except percentages) | 2011 | 2010 | $ | % | 2011 | 2010 | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reprographics services |
$ | 70.5 | $ | 78.5 | $ | (8.0 | ) | (10.2 | )% | $ | 140.5 | $ | 154.7 | $ | (14.2 | ) | (9.2 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Facilities management |
25.6 | 22.6 | 3.0 | 13.3 | % | 49.8 | 45.0 | 4.8 | 10.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Equipment and supplies sales |
13.5 | 14.0 | (0.5 | ) | (3.6 | )% | 25.8 | 27.5 | (1.7 | ) | (6.2 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total net sales |
$ | 109.6 | $ | 115.1 | $ | (5.5 | ) | (4.8 | )% | $ | 216.1 | $ | 227.2 | $ | (11.1 | ) | (4.9 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 35.7 | $ | 39.5 | $ | (3.8 | ) | (9.6 | )% | $ | 69.1 | $ | 76.3 | $ | (7.2 | ) | (9.4 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative
expenses |
$ | 26.8 | $ | 28.2 | $ | (1.4 | ) | (5.0 | )% | $ | 54.6 | $ | 55.3 | $ | (0.7 | ) | (1.3 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
$ | 4.7 | $ | 2.6 | $ | 2.1 | 80.8 | % | $ | 9.5 | $ | 5.2 | $ | 4.3 | 82.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
$ | 23.3 | $ | | $ | 23.3 | 100 | % | $ | 23.3 | $ | | $ | 23.3 | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net |
$ | 7.7 | $ | 5.8 | $ | 1.9 | 32.8 | % | $ | 15.9 | $ | 11.6 | $ | 4.3 | 37.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
$ | 57.9 | $ | 1.3 | $ | 56.6 | * | $ | 54.3 | $ | 1.8 | $ | 52.5 | * | ||||||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income attributable
to ARC |
$ | (84.6 | ) | $ | 1.7 | $ | (86.3 | ) | * | $ | (88.3 | ) | $ | 2.4 | $ | (90.7 | ) | * | ||||||||||||||
EBITDA |
$ | (6.9 | ) | $ | 19.8 | $ | (26.7 | ) | (134.8 | )% | $ | 6.5 | $ | 38.6 | $ | (32.1 | ) | (83.2 | )% |
* | Not meaningful |
Net Sales
Net sales decreased by 4.8% and 4.9% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011,
respectively, compared to the same periods in 2010.
The decrease in net sales was primarily due to an overall decrease in construction industry
spending, especially in the non-residential building segment.
Reprographics services. Reprographic services sales decreased by $8.0 million, or 10.2%, and $14.2
million, or 9.2%, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to
the same periods in 2010.
34
Table of Contents
Overall reprographics services sales nationwide were negatively affected by the lack of significant
new construction activity in the AEC industry. The revenue category that was most affected was
large-format black-and-white printing, as this revenue category is more closely tied to
non-residential and residential construction activity. Large-format black-and-white printing
revenues represented approximately 33% of reprographics services for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011; large-format black-and-white printing revenues decreased by approximately 19% and
18% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010.
Large and small-format color printing in both the AEC market, and in the non-AEC market, comprised
approximately 29% and 28% of our overall reprographics services sales for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2011, respectively, as compared to approximately 25% during the same periods of
2010. Despite the weakness in the AEC industry, net sales of digital color printing services have
increased approximately 3% and 4% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the
same periods in 2010. We partly attribute this growth in digital color printing to the continuing
marketing activity by our non-AEC customers and our focus in the non-AEC market.
We believe there is a growing demand for digital color printing services across all market segments
due to increased equipment availability and lower production prices. We have branded a portion of
our operations to address this growing demand for digital color printing. As of June 30, 2011, our
new marketing unit, Riot Creative Imaging, features 11 dedicated production facilities in major
metropolitan areas around the United States.
Facilities management. FM, or on-site, sales for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011,
increased $3.0 million, or 13.3%, and $4.8 million, or 10.7%, respectively, as compared to the same
periods in 2010. The number of FM accounts has remained stable at approximately 5,800 for the past
12 months, however we have experienced higher volumes from our stable customer base and attracted
new large high volume customers, even as contracts have been cancelled or not renewed. FM revenue
is derived from a single cost per square foot of printed material, similar to our traditional
reprographics services sales. As convenience and speed continue to characterize our customers
needs, and as printing equipment continues to become smaller and more affordable, the trend of
placing equipment, and sometimes staff, in an architectural studio or construction company office
remains strong. By placing equipment on-site and billing on a per-use and per-project basis, the
invoice continues to be issued by us, just as if the work was produced in one of our production
facilities. The resulting benefit is the convenience of on-site production with a pass-through or
reimbursable cost of business that many customers continue to find attractive.
In addition, much of the growth in our FM business can be attributed to the increase in our managed
print services (MPS) business, specifically from engagements with our larger clients. MPS is an
expanded variation of our traditional FM services; FMs serve the onsite reprographic needs of the
customer, whereas MPS provides both the reprographic and non-reprographic onsite print needs of the
customer.
Equipment and supplies sales. Equipment and supplies sales for the three and six months ended June
30, 2011 decreased $0.5 million, or 3.6% and $1.7 million, or 6.2%, respectively, as compared to
the same periods in 2010. The decrease in equipment and supplies sales was primarily due to our
Chinese operations, which experienced a reduction in year-over-year sales volume of $1.4 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2011, partially due to increased competition for a major
manufacturers reselling channel.
Gross Profit
Our gross profit and gross profit margin were $35.7 million, or 32.6%, respectively, during the
three months ended June 30, 2011, during which time we experienced a year-over-year sales decline
of $5.5 million. This compares to $39.5 million, or 34.3%, during the same period in 2010.
Our gross profit and gross profit margin were $69.1 million, or 32.0%, respectively, during the
six months ended June 30, 2011, during which time we experienced a year-over-year sales decline of
$11.1 million. This compares to $76.3 million, or 33.6%, during the same period in 2010.
Gross margins declined primarily due to higher materials costs as a percentage of color sales, the
booking of a one-time inventory reserve, and a change in our product and service mix. Specifically,
material costs as a percentage of sales for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 as
compared to the same period in 2010 increased by 210 basis points and 130 basis points,
respectively. We believe the increase in material cost as a percentage of color sales is due in
part, to our acceptance of some lower margin work to help gain market share in support of our new
color Riot Creative Imaging brand. The inventory reserve was booked for aging equipment in China,
and our business mix was affected by decreasing demand for large-format black and white printing,
increasing demand for our color printing services, and FM and MPS revenue making up a larger
portion of our overall sales than has been the case over the past three years.
In addition, unabsorbed labor costs resulting from the sales decline also resulted in lower margins
for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. Specifically, labor as
a percentage of revenue increased by 40 basis points during the six months ended June 30, 2011, as
compared to the same period in 2010. In response to the overall decline in sales, we began
reconfiguring our labor force to increase utilization in our operating regions and individual
production locations in the later part of the first quarter of 2011. We benefited from these
initiatives in the second quarter of 2011 resulting in a decrease of 30 basis points in labor as a
percentage of revenue in the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010.
We anticipate continued cost savings in future quarters.
35
Table of Contents
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $1.4 million, or 5.0%, during the three
months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $0.7 million, or 1.3%, during the six months
ended June 30, 2011, compared to the same period in 2010.
The decrease was primarily due to cost cutting initiatives implemented in 2011. General and
administrative expenses in total decreased $1.3 million, or 7%, and $1.5 million, or 4%, for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2010. This
decrease was primarily driven by the reconfiguration of our labor force to increase utilization in
our operating regions and individual production locations as noted above. The result was lower
general and administrative compensation, which decreased by $0.8 million and $1.3 million for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the same periods in 2010.
Despite the decrease in sales, sales compensation increased by $0.6 million during the six months
ended June 30, 2011, as compared to the same period in 2010 as we hired additional sales personnel
to implement new sales initiatives, such as Riot Creative Imaging, and our MPS offering.
Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales increased from 24.3% in
the six months ended June 30, 2010 to 25.3% in the six months ended June 30, 2011. This increase
was primarily due to the increase in sales compensation costs noted above, coupled with the sales
decline.
Amortization of Intangibles
Amortization of intangibles increased by $2.1 million and $4.3 million for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2011, compared to the same periods in 2010. This increase is due to the revised
useful lives assigned to trade names during the fourth quarter of 2010.
Goodwill Impairment
We assess goodwill at least annually for impairment as of September 30 or more frequently if events
and circumstances indicate that goodwill might be impaired. Goodwill impairment testing is
performed at the reporting unit level. At June 30, 2011, we determined that there were sufficient
indicators to trigger an interim goodwill impairment analysis. The indicators included, among other
factors, the current economic environment; the performance against plan of reporting units which
previously had goodwill impairment; and revised forecasted future earnings. The results of our
analysis indicated that six of our reporting units, all of which are located in the United States,
had a goodwill impairment as of June 30, 2011. Accordingly, we recorded a pretax, non-cash charge
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 to reduce the carrying value of goodwill by $23.3
million. See Critical Accounting Policies section for further information related to our goodwill
impairment test.
Interest Expense, Net
Net interest expense was $7.7 million and $15.9 million during the three and six months ended June
30, 2011, compared to $5.8 million and $11.6 million in the same periods in 2010. The increase in
interest expense was primarily driven by the amortization of the amended interest rate swap (The
Amended Swap Transaction), which was reclassified out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss into
earnings as a result of the de-designation from hedge accounting on December 1, 2010, which totaled
$1.5 million and $3.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. We
also incurred a higher effective interest rate due to the issuance of the 10.5% senior unsecured
notes (the Notes) on December 1, 2010, resulting in additional interest expense of $1.2 million
and $2.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. These increases were partially
offset by a reduction in the average debt balance of $22.8 million from the six months ended June
30 2010 to the six months ended June 30, 2011.
Income Taxes
Our effective income tax rate increased to 215.9% and 158.9% for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2011 from 42.4% and 42.5% for the same periods in 2010. The increase is primarily due to
the establishment of a $64.3 million valuation allowance against certain of our deferred tax assets
during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. The valuation allowance represents a non-cash
tax expense in our Statement of Operations. The deferred tax assets remain available to us for use
in future profitable quarters.
During the first quarter of 2011, the audit of our 2008 federal income tax return by the Internal
Revenue Service was finalized and resulted in no adjustments. Due to this final result and other
pertinent factors, we derecognized our liability for an uncertain tax position of $1.5 million and
related accrued interest of $0.1 million, which had an impact on our income tax provision for the
six months ended June 30, 2011.
Noncontrolling Interest
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interest represents 35% of the income or loss
attributable to UDS, our Chinese operations, which commenced operations on August 1, 2008.
36
Table of Contents
Net Loss Attributable to ARC
Net loss attributable to ARC was $84.6 million and $88.3 million during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to net income attributable to ARC of $1.7 million and
$2.4 million in the same periods in 2010. The net loss attributable to ARC in 2011 is primarily due
to the establishment of a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, the goodwill impairment as of
June 30, 2011 and the decrease in sales and gross margins described above.
EBITDA
EBITDA margin decreased to (6.3)% and 3.0% during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011,
respectively, compared to 17.2% and 17.0% during the same periods in 2010. Excluding the impact of
the goodwill impairment and stock based compensation, our adjusted EBITDA margin was 16.7% and
15.3% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. Adjusted EBITDA margin for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to 2010 was negatively affected by the
decrease in gross profit described above.
Impact of Inflation
Inflation has not had a significant effect on our operations. Price increases for raw materials,
such as paper and fuel charges, typically have been, and we expect will continue to be, passed on
to customers in the ordinary course of business.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal sources of cash have been operations and borrowings under our debt agreements. Our
historical uses of cash have been for acquisitions of reprographics businesses, payment of
principal and interest on outstanding debt obligations, and capital expenditures. Total cash as of
June 30, 2011 was $21.9 million. Of this amount, $12.4 million was held in foreign countries.
Specifically, $12.0 million was held in China and is considered a permanent investment in UDS.
Supplemental information pertaining to our historical sources and uses of cash is presented as
follows and should be read in conjunction with our interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report.
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
(In thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 11,873 | $ | 27,746 | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
$ | (16,704 | ) | $ | (1,932 | ) | ||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
$ | 140 | $ | (21,540 | ) |
Operating Activities
Cash flows from operations are primarily driven by sales and net profit generated from these sales,
excluding non-cash charges. The decrease in cash flows from operations was due to the decline in
sales and related profits, a decrease in accrued liabilities, an increase in interest expense, and
an increase in accounts receivable. The decrease in accrued liabilities was primarily driven by the
fact that accrued payroll expense for June 2011 consisted of four days, compared to 13 days in June
2010. The increase in accounts receivable was driven by the increase in sales in the second quarter
of 2011 compared to the fourth quarter of 2010, and an increase in days sales outstanding (DSO)
from 46 days as of June 30, 2010 to 50 days as of June 30, 2011. With the continued slowdown in the
AEC industry, we will continue to focus on our accounts receivable collections and DSO. If the
recent negative sales trends continue throughout 2011 and 2012, it will significantly impact our
cash flows from operations in the future. Inventory balances primarily increased due to timing of
equipment sales in our Chinese operations.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities of $16.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011
relates to capital expenditures of $7.6 million plus payment to terminate the Amended Swap
Transaction of $9.7 million, partially offset by $0.6 million of cash inflows from other investing
activities. Cash flows from other investing activities primarily relate to the cash proceeds
generated from the sale of fixed assets.
Financing Activities
Net cash of $0.1 million provided by financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2011
primarily relates to borrowings under our revolving credit facilities
of $14.6 million, which included $13.8 million under the $50 million credit agreement (the 2010 Credit
Agreement), offset by scheduled payments under capital leases and seller notes of
$14.1 million. Borrowings under the 2010 Credit Agreement were used in part, to terminate the
Amended Swap Transaction of $9.7 million.
37
Table of Contents
Our cash position, working capital, and debt obligations as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
are shown below and should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Balance Sheets and notes
thereto contained elsewhere in this report.
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(In thousands) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 21,907 | $ | 26,293 | ||||
Working capital |
$ | 36,231 | $ | 22,387 | ||||
Borrowings from senior secured
credit facility and Notes (1) |
$ | 209,759 | $ | 195,692 | ||||
Other debt obligations |
35,894 | 43,932 | ||||||
Total debt obligations |
$ | 245,653 | $ | 239,624 | ||||
(1) | Notes, net of discount of $4,041 and $4,308 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. |
The increase of $13.8 million in working capital in 2011 was due to an increase in other
current assets of $13.9 million, an increase in accounts receivable of $8.4 million, a decrease in
accrued liabilities of $10.6 million, partially offset by an increase in the current portion of
long-term debt of $8.8 million and a decrease in deferred income taxes of $7.2 million. The
increase in other current assets is primarily attributed to an increase in income taxes receivable
related to our intent to carryback 2010 tax losses. The increase in accounts receivable is due to
the increase in sales in May and June 2011, as compared to November and December 2010, as well as
the increase in DSO from 45 days as of December 31, 2010 to 50 days as of June 30, 2011. The
decrease in accrued liabilities is primarily related to the payment upon termination of the Amended
Swap Transaction, which was paid using borrowings from the 2010 Credit Agreement. Borrowings under
the 2010 Credit Agreement are offset by the $4.2 million decrease in the current portion of seller
notes. To manage our working capital, we focus on our number of days sales outstanding and monitor
the aging of our accounts receivable, as receivables are the most significant element of our
working capital.
We believe that our current cash balance of $21.9 million, availability under our revolving credit
facility and additional cash flows provided by operations should be adequate to cover the next
twelve months working capital needs, debt service requirements which consists of scheduled
principal and interest payments, and planned capital expenditures, to the extent such items are
known or are reasonably determinable based on current business and market conditions. In addition,
we may elect to finance certain of our capital expenditure requirements through the issuance of
additional debt which is dependent on availability of third party financing. See Debt Obligations
section for further information related to the 2010 Credit Agreement.
We generate the majority of our revenue from sales of products and services provided to the AEC
industry. As a result, our operating results and financial condition can be significantly affected
by economic factors that influence the AEC industry, such as non-residential and residential
construction spending. The downturn in the residential and non-residential construction activity in
the AEC industry, has adversely affected our operating results. The current diminished liquidity
and credit availability in financial markets and a general economic environment may adversely
affect the ability of our customers and suppliers to obtain financing for significant operations
and purchases, and to perform their obligations under their agreements with us. We believe the
credit constraints in the financial markets are resulting in a decrease in, or cancellation of,
existing business, could limit new business, and could negatively impact our ability to collect our
accounts receivable on a timely basis. We are unable to predict the duration and severity of the
downturn in the construction industry or its effects on our business and results of operations.
Debt Obligations
10.5% Senior Notes due 2016
On December 1, 2010 (the Closing Date), we completed a private placement of 10.5% senior
unsecured notes due 2016.
The Notes have an aggregate principal amount of $200 million. The Notes are general unsecured
senior obligations and are subordinate to all of our existing and future senior secured debt to the
extent of the assets securing such debt. Our obligations under the Notes are jointly and severally
guaranteed by all of our domestic subsidiaries. The issue price was 97.824% with a yield to
maturity of 11.0%. Interest on the Notes accrues at a rate of 10.5% per annum and is payable
semiannually in arrears on June 15 and December 15 of each year, commencing on June 15, 2011. We
will make each interest payment to the holders of record of the Notes on the immediately preceding
June 1 and December 1.
We received gross proceeds of $195.6 million from the Notes offering. In connection with the
issuance of the Notes, we entered into an indenture, dated as of the Closing Date (the
Indenture), among our company, certain of our subsidiaries are named therein, as guarantors (the
Guarantors), and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee; and a Registration Rights
Agreement, dated as of the Closing Date (the Registration Rights Agreement), among our company,
the Guarantors, and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as representatives of the
initial purchasers of the Notes (the Initial Purchasers). The Notes were offered only to
qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(the Securities Act), and outside the United States to non-U.S. persons pursuant to Regulation S
under the Securities Act.
38
Table of Contents
Optional Redemption. At any time prior to December 15, 2013, we may redeem all or part of the Notes
upon not less than 30 nor more than 60 days prior notice at a redemption price equal to the sum of
(i) 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus (ii) a make-whole premium as of the date of
redemption, plus (iii) accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption. In addition,
we may redeem some or all of the Notes on or after December 15, 2013, at redemption prices set
forth in the Indenture, together with accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of
redemption. At any time prior to December 15, 2013, we may use the proceeds of certain equity
offerings to redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes, including any
permitted additional notes, at a redemption price equal to 110.5% of the principal amount of the
Notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption.
Repurchase upon Change of Control. Upon the occurrence of a change in control (as defined in the
Indenture), each holder of the Notes may require us to repurchase all of the then-outstanding Notes
in cash at a price equal to 101% of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes to be repurchased,
plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of repurchase.
Other Covenants. The Indenture contains covenants that limit, among other things, our companys and
certain of our subsidiaries ability to (1) incur additional debt and issue preferred stock, (2)
make certain restricted payments, (3) consummate specified asset sales, (4) enter into certain
transactions with affiliates, (5) create liens, (6) declare or pay any dividend or make any other
distributions, (7) make certain investments, and (8) merge or consolidate with another person.
Events of Default. The Indenture provides for customary events of default (subject in certain cases
to customary grace and cure periods), which include non-payment, breach of covenants in the
Indenture, cross default and acceleration of other indebtedness, a failure to pay certain judgments
and certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency. Generally, if an event of default occurs, the
Trustee or holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the then outstanding Notes may declare
the principal of and accrued but unpaid interest on all of the then-outstanding Notes to be due and
payable.
Exchange Offer. Pursuant to a registered exchange offer in May 2011, the Company offered to
exchange up to $200 million aggregate principal amount of the Notes, for new notes that were
registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The terms of such registered notes are the
same as the terms of the Notes, except that they are now registered under the Securities Act and
the transfer restrictions, registration rights and additional interest provisions are not
applicable to the registered notes. The Company accepted the exchange of $200 million aggregate
principal amounts of the Notes that were properly tendered.
2010 Credit Agreement
On the Closing Date, our company and certain of our subsidiaries also entered into the 2010 Credit
Agreement and paid off in full amounts outstanding under our prior credit agreement.
The 2010 Credit Agreement provides for a $50 million senior secured revolving line of credit, of
which up to $20 million is available for the issuance of letters of credit. The revolving line of
credit is available on a revolving basis during the period commencing after the Closing Date and
ending on December 1, 2015 and is secured by substantially all of our assets and certain of our
subsidiaries. Advances under the revolving line of credit are subject to customary borrowing
conditions, including the accuracy of representations and warranties and the absence of events of
default. We may borrow, partially or wholly repay its outstanding borrowings and reborrow, subject
to the terms and conditions contained in the 2010 Credit Agreement.
The obligations under the 2010 Credit Agreement are guaranteed by our domestic subsidiaries and,
subject to certain exceptions, are secured by security interests granted in all of our and domestic
subsidiaries personal and real property.
Advances under the 2010 Credit Agreement bear interest at LIBOR plus the applicable rate. The
initial applicable is 2.00%. The applicable rate is determined based upon our consolidated leverage
ratio with a minimum and maximum applicable rate of 1.50% and 2.00%, respectively. During the
continuation of certain events of default, all amounts due under the 2010 Credit Agreement bear
interest at 4.0% above the rate otherwise applicable. In addition, we are required to pay an unused
commitment fee on the average daily unused amount of the line of credit at the applicable rate,
calculated and payable quarterly in arrears, as follows: if the consolidated leverage ratio is (i)
greater than or equal to 3.00x, the unused commitment fee is 0.20%, (ii) less than or equal to
2.99x but greater than or equal to 2.00x, 0.15%, and (iii) less than 2.00x, 0.10%.
The 2010 Credit Agreement contains the following financial covenants:
| Maximum consolidated leverage ratio: |
| 4.35:1.00 for quarters ending December 31, 2010 through
September 30, 2011 |
||
| 4.25:1.00 for quarters ending December 31, 2011 through
September 30, 2012 |
||
| 4.15:1.00 for quarters ending December 31, 2012 through
September 30, 2013 |
39
Table of Contents
| 4.00:1.00 for quarters ending December 31, 2013 through maturity; |
| Maximum consolidated senior secured debt leverage ratio not
greater than 1.50:1.00, determined on the last day of each
fiscal quarter through maturity; |
||
| Minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio: |
| 1.70:1.00 for quarters ending December 31, 2010 through
September 30, 2011 |
||
| 1.75:1.00 for quarters ending December 31, 2011 through maturity; |
The 2010 Credit Agreement also contains covenants which, subject to certain exceptions as set forth
in the 2010 Credit Agreement, restrict our ability to incur additional debt, grant liens or
guaranty other indebtedness, pay dividends, redeem stock, pay or redeem subordinated indebtedness,
make investments or capital expenditures, dispose or acquire assets, dispose of equity interests in
subsidiaries, enter into any merger, sale of assets, consolidation or liquidation transaction, or
engage in transactions with stockholders and affiliates. Covenants in the 2010 Credit Agreement
also require that we provide periodic financial reports to the lender, observe certain practices
and procedures with respect to the collateral pledged as security, comply with applicable laws and
maintain and preserve our companys and our subsidiaries properties and maintain insurance.
As of June 30, 2011, we were in compliance with the financial incurrence-based covenants under the
Notes and financial maintenance-based covenants under the 2010 Credit Agreement. Our trailing
twelve months key financial covenant ratios under the 2010 Credit Agreement as of June 30, 2011
were 1.82:1.00 for minimum interest coverage, 3.76:1.00 for maximum total leverage and 0.69:1.00
for maximum senior secured leverage.
As of June 30, 2011, we expect to remain in compliance through the respective terms of our Notes
and 2010 Credit Agreement. However, it is possible that a default under certain financial covenants
may occur in the future, should the minimum required profitability levels not be achieved. If we
default on the covenants under the 2010 Credit Agreement and are unable to obtain waivers from our
lenders, the lenders will be able to exercise their rights and remedies under the 2010 Credit
Agreement, which would have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
As of June 30, 2011, standby letters of credit aggregated to $3.9 million. The standby letters of
credit under the 2010 Credit Agreement and borrowing of $13.8 million reduced our borrowing
availability under the 2010 Credit Agreement to $32.3 million.
Foreign Credit Facility
In the second quarter of 2011, in conjunction with its Chinese operations, UNIS Document Solutions
Co. Ltd. (UDS) entered into one-year revolving credit facility. The facility provides for a
maximum credit amount of 8.0 million Chinese Yuan Renminbi. This translates to U.S. $1.2 million as
of June 30, 2011. Draws on the facility are limited to 30 day periods and incur a fee of 0.5% of
the amount drawn and no additional interest is charged.
Interest Rate Swap Transaction
On December 19, 2007, we entered into an interest rate swap transaction (the Swap Transaction) in
order to hedge the floating interest rate risk on our long term variable rate debt. Under the terms
of the Swap Transaction, we were required to make quarterly fixed rate payments to the counterparty
calculated based on an initial notional amount of $271.6 million at a fixed rate of 4.1375%, while
the counterparty was obligated to make quarterly floating rate payments to us based on the three
month LIBOR. The notional amount of the Swap Transaction was scheduled to decline over the term of
the then existing term loan facility consistent with the scheduled principal payments. The Swap
Transaction had an effective date of March 31, 2008 and an original termination date of December 6,
2012.
On October 2, 2009, we amended the Swap Transaction. We entered into the Amended Swap Transaction
in order to reduce the notional amount under the initial Swap Transaction from $271.6 million to
$210.8 million to hedge our then-existing variable interest rate debt under our previous credit
agreement.
In connection with the issuance of the Notes, the Amended Swap Transaction no longer qualified as a
cash flow hedge and was de-designated.
As of December 31, 2010, the Amended Swap Transaction had a negative fair value of $9.7 million of
which all was recorded in accrued expenses. On January 3, 2011, the Amended Swap Transaction was
terminated and settled. For further information, see Note 9 Derivatives and Hedging Transactions.
Capital Leases
As of June 30, 2011, we had $31.1 million of capital lease obligations outstanding, with a weighted
average interest rate of 8.7% and maturities
between 2011 and 2016.
40
Table of Contents
Seller Notes
As of June 30, 2011, we had $3.9 million of seller notes outstanding, with a weighted average
interest rate of 6.2% and maturities between 2011 and 2013. These notes were issued in connection
with prior acquisitions.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated
entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or
special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating
off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments
Operating Leases. We have entered into various non-cancelable operating leases primarily related to
facilities, equipment and vehicles used in the ordinary course of business.
Contingent Transaction Consideration. We have entered into earnout obligations in connection with
prior acquisitions. If the acquired businesses generate sales and/or operating profits in excess of
predetermined targets, we are obligated to make additional cash payments in accordance with the
terms of such earnout obligations. As of June 30, 2011, we had potential future earnout obligations
for acquisitions consummated before the adoption of ASC 805 in the total amount of approximately
$1.5 million through 2014 if predetermined financial targets are met or exceeded. These earnout
payments are recorded as additional purchase price (as goodwill) when the contingent payments are
earned and become payable.
Legal Proceedings. On October 21, 2010, a former employee, individually and on behalf of a
purported class consisting of all non-exempt employees who work or worked for American
Reprographics Company, LLC and American Reprographics Company in the State of California at any
time from October 21, 2006 through October 21, 2010, filed an action against us in the Superior
Court of California for the County of Orange. The complaint alleges, among other things, that we
violated the California Labor Code by failing to (i) provide meal and rest periods, or compensation
in lieu thereof, (ii) timely pay wages due at termination, and (iii) that those practices also
violate the California Business and Professions Code. The relief sought includes damages,
restitution, penalties, interest, costs, and attorneys fees and such other relief as the court
deems proper. We have not included any liability in our Consolidated Financial Statements in
connection with this matter. We cannot reasonably estimate the amount or range of possible loss, if
any, at this time.
In addition to the matter described above, we are involved in various additional legal proceedings
and other legal matters from time to time in the normal course of business. We do not believe that
the outcome of any of these matters will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our management prepares financial statements in conformity with GAAP. When we prepare these
financial statements, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those
related to accounts receivable, inventories, deferred tax assets, goodwill and intangible assets
and long-lived assets. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various
other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form
the basis for our judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not
readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions.
Goodwill Impairment
In connection with acquisitions, we apply the provisions of ASC 805, using the acquisition method
of accounting. The excess purchase price over the fair value of net tangible assets and
identifiable intangible assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.
We assess goodwill at least annually for impairment as of September 30 or more frequently if events
and circumstances indicate that goodwill might be impaired. At June 30, 2011, we determined that
there were sufficient indicators to trigger an interim goodwill impairment analysis. The indicators
included, among other factors: (1) the current economic environment, (2) the performance against plan of
reporting units which previously had goodwill impairment, and (3) revised forecasted future earnings.
The results of our analysis indicated that six of our reporting units, all of which are located in
the United States, had a goodwill impairment as of June 30, 2011. Accordingly, we recorded a
pretax, non-cash charge for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 to reduce the carrying
value of goodwill by $23.3 million.
Goodwill impairment testing is performed at the reporting unit level. Goodwill is assigned to
reporting units at the date the goodwill is initially recorded. Once goodwill has been assigned to
reporting units, it no longer retains its association with a particular acquisition, and all of the
activities within a reporting unit, whether acquired or internally generated, are available to
support the value of the goodwill.
41
Table of Contents
Goodwill impairment testing is a two-step process. Step one involves comparing the fair value of
our reporting units to their carrying amount. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit is greater
than zero and its fair value is greater than its carrying amount, there is no impairment. If the
reporting units carrying amount is greater than the fair value, the second step must be completed
to measure the amount of impairment, if any. Step two involves calculating the implied fair value
of goodwill by deducting the fair value of all tangible and intangible assets, excluding goodwill,
of the reporting unit from the fair value of the reporting unit as determined in step one. The
implied fair value of goodwill determined in this step is compared to the carrying value of
goodwill. If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying value of goodwill, an
impairment loss is recognized equal to the difference.
We determine the fair value of our reporting units using an income approach. Under the income
approach, we determined fair value based on estimated discounted future cash flows of each
reporting unit. Determining the fair value of a reporting unit is judgmental in nature and requires
the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including revenue growth rates and EBITDA
margins, discount rates and future market conditions, among others. The estimated fair value of our
reporting units were based upon a projected EBITDA margin, which is
anticipated to have a slight increase from
2011 to 2012, followed by year over year increases of approximately 150 300 basis points in 2013
through 2015, with stabilization in 2016. These projections are driven, in part, by anticipated
industry growth rates, anticipated GDP, customer composition and historical performance. These cash
flows are discounted using a weighted average cost of capital ranging from 12% to 14%, depending
upon the size and risk profile of the reporting unit. We considered market information in assessing
the reasonableness of the fair value under the income approach outlined above.
The results of step one of the goodwill impairment test, as of June 30, 2011, were as follows:
Number of | ||||||||
Reporting | Representing | |||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Units | Goodwill of | ||||||
No goodwill balance |
12 | $ | | |||||
Reporting units failing step one that continue to carry a goodwill balance |
6 | 29,436 | ||||||
Fair value of reporting unit exceeds its carrying value by 5% - 20% |
3 | 88,654 | ||||||
Fair value of reporting unit exceeds its carrying value by 20% - 40% |
7 | 59,988 | ||||||
Fair value of reporting unit exceeds its carrying value by more than 40% |
8 | 93,346 | ||||||
36 | $ | 271,424 | ||||||
Based upon a sensitivity analysis, a reduction of approximately 50 basis points of projected EBITDA
in 2011 and beyond, assuming all other assumptions remain constant, would not result in any
additional reporting units proceeding to step two of the analysis. However, the decrease of
projected EBITDA in 2011 and subsequent years would have resulted in an additional impairment
charge of $2.4 million for those reporting units that were evaluated in step two.
Based upon a separate sensitivity analysis, a 50 basis point increase to the weighted average cost
of capital would result in one additional reporting unit proceeding to step two of the analysis,
and a further impairment of approximately $22.6 million.
Given the current economic environment and the uncertainties regarding the impact on our business,
there can be no assurance that the estimates and assumptions regarding the duration of the lack of
significant new construction activity in the AEC industry, or the period or strength of recovery,
made for purposes of our goodwill impairment testing as of June 30, 2011, will prove to be accurate
predictions of the future. If our assumptions regarding forecasted EBITDA margins of certain
reporting units are not achieved, we may be required to record additional goodwill impairment
charges in future periods, whether in connection with our next annual impairment testing in the
third quarter of 2011, or following that, if any such change constitutes a triggering event outside
of the quarter when we regularly perform our annual goodwill impairment test. It is not possible at
this time to determine if any such future impairment charge would result or, if it does, whether
such charge would be material.
Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect temporary differences between the amount of assets and
liabilities for financial and tax reporting purposes. Such amounts are adjusted, as appropriate, to
reflect changes in tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary differences reverse. A
valuation allowance is recorded to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely
than not to be realized. Changes in tax laws or accounting standards and methods may affect
recorded deferred taxes in future periods.
When establishing a valuation allowance, we consider future sources of taxable income such as
future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, future taxable income exclusive of
reversing temporary differences and carryforwards and tax planning strategies. A tax planning
strategy is an action that: is prudent and feasible; an enterprise ordinarily might not take, but
would take to prevent an operating loss or tax credit carryforward from expiring unused; and would
result in realization of deferred tax assets. In the event we determine the deferred tax assets,
more likely than not, will not be realized in the future, the valuation adjustment to the deferred
tax assets will be charged to earnings in the period in which we make such a determination. As of
June 30, 2011, we determined that cumulative losses for the preceding twelve quarters constituted
sufficient objective evidence that a valuation allowance was needed, and therefore established a
$64.3 million valuation allowance
on certain of our deferred tax assets.
42
Table of Contents
In future quarters we will evaluate our results to determine whether we will generate sufficient
taxable income to utilize our deferred tax assets, and whether a partial or full valuation
allowance will be required. Should we generate sufficient taxable income, however, we may reverse
a portion or all of the then current valuation allowance.
We calculate our current and deferred tax provision based on estimates and assumptions that could
differ from the actual results reflected in income tax returns filed in subsequent years.
Adjustments based on filed returns are recorded when identified.
Income taxes have not been provided on certain undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries
because such earnings are considered to be permanently reinvested.
The amount of taxable income or loss we report to the various tax jurisdictions is subject to
ongoing audits by federal, state and foreign tax authorities. Our estimate of the potential outcome
of any uncertain tax issue is subject to managements assessment of relevant risks, facts, and
circumstances existing at that time. We use a more-likely-than-not threshold for financial
statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax
return. We record a liability for the difference between the benefit recognized and measured and
tax position taken or expected to be taken on our tax return. To the extent that our assessment of
such tax positions changes, the change in estimate is recorded in the period in which the
determination is made. We report tax-related interest and penalties as a component of income tax
expense.
For further information regarding the accounting policies that we believe to be critical accounting
policies and that affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in preparing our interim
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements see our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, except for the
adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No.
2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task
Force, (ASU 2009-13), FASB ASU No. 2010-28, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, (ASU 2010-28) and
FASB ASU No. 2010-29, Business Combinations- Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for
Business Combinations, (ASU 2010-29) which are further described in Note 14, Recent Accounting
Pronouncements to our interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1, Description of Business and Basis of Presentation to our interim Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements for disclosure on recent accounting pronouncements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our primary exposure to market risk is interest rate risk associated with our debt instruments. We
use both fixed and variable rate debt as sources of financing. Historically, we have entered into
derivative instruments to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates. These instruments allow
us to raise funds at floating rates and effectively swap them into fixed rates, without the
exchange of the underlying principal amount.
As of June 30, 2011, we had $245.7 million of total debt, net of discount, and capital lease
obligations, none of which bore interest at variable rates, except for the $13.8 million
outstanding on our revolving credit facility.
We have not, and do not plan to, enter into any derivative financial instruments for trading or
speculative purposes. As of June 30, 2011, we had no other significant material exposure to market
risk, including foreign exchange risk and commodity risks.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act) are recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods
specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated
to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange
Act) as of June 30, 2011. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2011, our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective.
43
Table of Contents
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes to internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June
30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On October 21, 2010, a former employee, individually and on behalf of a purported class consisting
of all non-exempt employees who work or worked for American Reprographics Company, LLC and American
Reprographics Company in the State of California at any time from October 21, 2006 through October
21, 2010, filed an action against us in the Superior Court of California for the County of Orange.
The complaint alleges, among other things, that we violated the California Labor Code by failing to
(i) provide meal and rest periods, or compensation in lieu thereof, (ii) timely pay wages due at
termination, and (iii) that those practices also violate the California Business and Professions
Code. The relief sought includes damages, restitution, penalties, interest, costs, and attorneys
fees and such other relief as the court deems proper. We have not included any liability in our
Consolidated Financial Statements in connection with this matter. We cannot reasonably estimate the
amount or range of possible loss, if any, at this time.
In addition to the matter described above, we are involved in various legal proceedings and claims
from time to time in the normal course of business. We do not believe, based on currently available
information, that the final outcome of any of these matters, taken individually or as a whole, will
have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or
cash flows. We believe the amounts provided in our Consolidated Financial Statements, which are not
material, are adequate in light of the probable and estimable liabilities. However, because such
matters are subject to many uncertainties, the ultimate outcomes are not predictable and there can
be no assurances that the actual amounts required to satisfy alleged liabilities will not exceed
the amounts reflected in our Consolidated Financial Statements or will not have a material adverse
effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Information concerning certain risks and uncertainties appears in Part I, Item 1A Risk Factors of
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. You should carefully
consider those risks and uncertainties, which could materially affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations. There have been no material changes to the risk factors
disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
44
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit | ||
Number | Description | |
10.1
|
Executive Employment Agreement, dated July 18,
2011, by and between American Reprographics
Company and John Toth (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on July 18, 2011). |
|
10.2
|
Indemnification Agreement by and between American
Reprographics Company and John E.D. Toth
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 1,
2011). |
|
10.3
|
Indemnification Agreement by and between American
Reprographics Company and Jorge Avalos
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 1,
2011). |
|
31.1
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
|
31.2
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
|
32.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
|
32.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
|
101.INS
|
XBRL Instance Document * |
|
101.SCH
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema * |
|
101.CAL
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase * |
|
101.DEF
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase * |
|
101.LAB
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase * |
|
101.PRE
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase * |
* | Filed herewith |
45
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: August 9, 2011
AMERICAN REPROGRAPHICS COMPANY |
||||
/s/ KUMARAKULASINGAM SURIYAKUMAR | ||||
Kumarakulasingam Suriyakumar | ||||
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
/s/ JORGE AVALOS | ||||
Jorge Avalos | ||||
Chief Accounting Officer |
46
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | ||
Number | Description | |
10.1
|
Executive Employment Agreement, dated July 18,
2011, by and between American Reprographics
Company and John Toth (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on July 18, 2011). |
|
10.2
|
Indemnification Agreement by and between American
Reprographics Company and John E.D. Toth
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 1,
2011). |
|
10.3
|
Indemnification Agreement by and between American
Reprographics Company and Jorge Avalos
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 1,
2011). |
|
31.1
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
|
31.2
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
|
32.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
|
32.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.* |
|
101.INS
|
XBRL Instance Document * |
|
101.SCH
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema * |
|
101.CAL
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase * |
|
101.DEF
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase * |
|
101.LAB
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase * |
|
101.PRE
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase * |
* | Filed herewith |
47