Archrock, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2010 March (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(MARK ONE)
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED March 31, 2010
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO .
Commission File No. 001-33666
EXTERRAN HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
74-3204509 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
16666 Northchase Drive Houston, Texas (Address of principal executive offices) |
77060 (Zip Code) |
(281) 836-7000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Number of
shares of the common stock of the registrant outstanding as of
April 30, 2010: 63,134,652
shares.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
8 | ||||||||
27 | ||||||||
40 | ||||||||
40 | ||||||||
41 | ||||||||
41 | ||||||||
42 | ||||||||
43 | ||||||||
44 | ||||||||
EX-10.1 | ||||||||
EX-10.2 | ||||||||
EX-10.3 | ||||||||
EX-10.4 | ||||||||
EX-10.5 | ||||||||
EX-10.6 | ||||||||
EX-10.7 | ||||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32.1 | ||||||||
EX-32.2 |
2
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
EXTERRAN HOLDINGS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except par value and share amounts)
(unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except par value and share amounts)
(unaudited)
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 67,403 | $ | 83,745 | ||||
Restricted cash |
20,416 | 14,871 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $14,533 and $15,342, respectively |
405,852 | 447,504 | ||||||
Inventory, net |
488,324 | 489,982 | ||||||
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts |
171,035 | 180,181 | ||||||
Current deferred income taxes |
22,510 | 25,913 | ||||||
Other current assets |
107,774 | 118,813 | ||||||
Current assets associated with discontinued operations |
9,093 | 58,152 | ||||||
Total current assets |
1,292,407 | 1,419,161 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
3,352,654 | 3,404,354 | ||||||
Goodwill, net |
195,644 | 195,164 | ||||||
Intangible and other assets, net |
263,722 | 273,883 | ||||||
Long-term assets associated with discontinued operations |
7,076 | 386 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 5,111,503 | $ | 5,292,948 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable, trade |
$ | 127,029 | $ | 131,337 | ||||
Accrued liabilities |
298,264 | 321,412 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
165,830 | 206,160 | ||||||
Billings on uncompleted contracts in excess of costs and estimated earnings |
163,998 | 156,245 | ||||||
Current liabilities associated with discontinued operations |
26,025 | 21,879 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
781,146 | 837,033 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
2,143,945 | 2,260,936 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
176,547 | 179,327 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
170,217 | 182,126 | ||||||
Long-term liabilities associated with discontinued operations |
11,932 | 16,667 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
3,283,787 | 3,476,089 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12) |
||||||||
Equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share; 50,000,000 shares authorized; zero issued |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share, 250,000,000 shares authorized; 68,906,476
and 68,195,447 shares issued, respectively |
689 | 682 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
3,440,562 | 3,434,618 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(34,095 | ) | (27,879 | ) | ||||
Accumulated deficit |
(1,548,827 | ) | (1,565,489 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock 5,754,623 and 5,667,897 common shares, at cost, respectively |
(203,605 | ) | (201,935 | ) | ||||
Total Exterran stockholders equity |
1,654,724 | 1,639,997 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest |
172,992 | 176,862 | ||||||
Total equity |
1,827,716 | 1,816,859 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 5,111,503 | $ | 5,292,948 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
3
Table of Contents
EXTERRAN HOLDINGS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||
North America contract operations |
$ | 152,627 | $ | 194,393 | ||||
International contract operations |
109,740 | 90,679 | ||||||
Aftermarket services |
70,323 | 75,531 | ||||||
Fabrication |
243,618 | 342,609 | ||||||
576,308 | 703,212 | |||||||
Costs and Expenses: |
||||||||
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization expense): |
||||||||
North America contract operations |
71,375 | 83,705 | ||||||
International contract operations |
40,855 | 32,805 | ||||||
Aftermarket services |
56,612 | 59,754 | ||||||
Fabrication |
196,873 | 286,714 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
84,051 | 85,111 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
91,775 | 82,073 | ||||||
Long-lived asset impairment |
1,707 | 5,600 | ||||||
Restructuring charges |
| 1,704 | ||||||
Interest expense |
32,934 | 26,734 | ||||||
Equity in loss of non-consolidated affiliates |
| 91,117 | ||||||
Other (income) expense, net |
(2,183 | ) | (3,362 | ) | ||||
573,999 | 751,955 | |||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
2,309 | (48,743 | ) | |||||
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes |
(3,999 | ) | 10,963 | |||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
6,308 | (59,706 | ) | |||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
10,425 | 1,806 | ||||||
Net income (loss) |
16,733 | (57,900 | ) | |||||
Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest |
(71 | ) | (1,514 | ) | ||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Exterran stockholders |
$ | 16,662 | $ | (59,414 | ) | |||
Basic income (loss) per common share: |
||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Exterran stockholders |
$ | 0.10 | $ | (1.00 | ) | |||
Income from discontinued operations attributable to Exterran stockholders |
0.17 | 0.03 | ||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Exterran stockholders |
$ | 0.27 | $ | (0.97 | ) | |||
Diluted income (loss) per common share: |
||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Exterran stockholders |
$ | 0.10 | $ | (1.00 | ) | |||
Income from discontinued operations attributable to Exterran stockholders |
0.17 | 0.03 | ||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Exterran stockholders |
$ | 0.27 | $ | (0.97 | ) | |||
Weighted average common and equivalent shares outstanding: |
||||||||
Basic |
61,836 | 61,209 | ||||||
Diluted |
62,546 | 61,209 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
4
Table of Contents
EXTERRAN HOLDINGS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)
(unaudited)
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 16,733 | $ | (57,900 | ) | |||
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
||||||||
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments |
(867 | ) | (2,355 | ) | ||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
(5,408 | ) | (5,701 | ) | ||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
10,458 | (65,956 | ) | |||||
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to the noncontrolling interest |
12 | 2,144 | ||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Exterran |
$ | 10,446 | $ | (68,100 | ) | |||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
5
Table of Contents
Exterran Holdings, Inc. Stockholders | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Paid-in | Comprehensive | Treasury | Accumulated | Noncontrolling | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock | Capital | Loss | Stock | Deficit | Interest | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
$ | 672 | $ | 3,354,922 | $ | (94,767 | ) | $ | (200,959 | ) | $ | (1,016,082 | ) | $ | 184,291 | $ | 2,228,077 | |||||||||||
Treasury stock purchased |
(393 | ) | (393 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued in employee stock purchase plan |
1 | 960 | 961 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense, net of forfeitures |
7 | 5,965 | 332 | 6,304 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense from stock-based compensation expense |
(1,522 | ) | (1,522 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash distribution to noncontrolling unitholders of the
Partnership |
(3,857 | ) | (3,857 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
165 | 165 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
(59,414 | ) | 1,514 | (57,900 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives change in fair value, net of tax |
(2,985 | ) | 630 | (2,355 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
(5,701 | ) | (5,701 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
$ | 680 | $ | 3,360,325 | $ | (103,453 | ) | $ | (201,352 | ) | $ | (1,075,496 | ) | $ | 183,075 | $ | 2,163,779 | |||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
$ | 682 | $ | 3,434,618 | $ | (27,879 | ) | $ | (201,935 | ) | $ | (1,565,489 | ) | $ | 176,862 | $ | 1,816,859 | |||||||||||
Treasury stock purchased |
(1,670 | ) | (1,670 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Options exercised |
342 | 342 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued in employee stock purchase plan |
1 | 649 | 650 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense, net of forfeitures |
6 | 5,401 | (58 | ) | 5,349 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense from stock-based compensation expense |
(448 | ) | (448 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash distribution to noncontrolling unitholders of the
Partnership |
(3,872 | ) | (3,872 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
48 | 48 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
16,662 | 71 | 16,733 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives change in fair value, net of tax |
(808 | ) | (59 | ) | (867 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
(5,408 | ) | (5,408 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2010 |
$ | 689 | $ | 3,440,562 | $ | (34,095 | ) | $ | (203,605 | ) | $ | (1,548,827 | ) | $ | 172,992 | $ | 1,827,716 | |||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 16,733 | $ | (57,900 | ) | |||
Adjustments: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
91,775 | 82,073 | ||||||
Amortization of debt discount |
3,953 | | ||||||
Long-lived asset impairment |
1,707 | 5,600 | ||||||
Deferred financing cost amortization |
1,280 | 805 | ||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
(10,425 | ) | (1,806 | ) | ||||
Provision for doubtful accounts |
950 | 1,897 | ||||||
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment |
(1,241 | ) | (710 | ) | ||||
Equity in loss of non-consolidated affiliates, net of dividends received |
| 91,117 | ||||||
Interest rate swaps |
262 | 452 | ||||||
(Gain) loss on remeasurement of intercompany balances |
1,434 | (1,229 | ) | |||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
5,349 | 6,145 | ||||||
Deferred income tax provision |
(9,921 | ) | 225 | |||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable and notes |
39,409 | (82,859 | ) | |||||
Inventory |
8,783 | (117,814 | ) | |||||
Costs and estimated earnings versus billings on uncompleted contracts |
14,324 | 151,630 | ||||||
Prepaid and other current assets |
10,112 | (4,545 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
(25,639 | ) | (33,858 | ) | ||||
Deferred revenue |
(39,921 | ) | 42,472 | |||||
Other |
(1,874 | ) | (13,497 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by continuing operations |
107,050 | 68,198 | ||||||
Net cash provided by discontinued operations |
| 611 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
107,050 | 68,809 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(47,861 | ) | (122,500 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
5,386 | 3,194 | ||||||
Increase in restricted cash |
(5,545 | ) | (3,989 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in continuing operations |
(48,020 | ) | (123,295 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations |
50,000 | (611 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
1,980 | (123,906 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from borrowings of long-term debt |
53,000 | 76,500 | ||||||
Repayments of long-term debt |
(173,943 | ) | (35,022 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
342 | | ||||||
Proceeds from stock issued pursuant to our employee stock purchase plan |
650 | 961 | ||||||
Purchases of treasury stock |
(1,670 | ) | (393 | ) | ||||
Stockbased compensation excess tax benefit |
734 | 7 | ||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling partners in the Partnership |
(3,872 | ) | (3,857 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(124,759 | ) | 38,196 | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents |
(613 | ) | 536 | |||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(16,342 | ) | (16,365 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
83,745 | 123,906 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 67,403 | $ | 107,541 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
EXTERRAN HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Exterran Holdings, Inc.
(Exterran, we, us or our) included herein have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S.) for interim financial
information and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (GAAP) are not required in
these interim financial statements and have been condensed or omitted. It is the opinion of
management that the information furnished includes all adjustments, consisting only of normal
recurring adjustments, that are necessary to present fairly our financial position, results of
operations and cash flows for the periods indicated.
Earnings (Loss) Attributable to Exterran Per Common Share
Basic income (loss) attributable to Exterran stockholders per common share is computed by dividing
income (loss) attributable to Exterran common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares
outstanding for the period. Diluted income (loss) attributable to Exterran stockholders per common
share is computed using the weighted average number of shares outstanding adjusted for the
incremental common stock equivalents attributed to outstanding options and warrants to purchase
common stock, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock issued pursuant to our employee stock
purchase plan and convertible senior notes, unless their effect would be anti-dilutive.
The table below summarizes income (loss) attributable to Exterran stockholders (in thousands):
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
$ | 6,237 | $ | (61,220 | ) | |||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
10,425 | 1,806 | ||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Exterran stockholders |
$ | 16,662 | $ | (59,414 | ) | |||
The table below indicates the potential shares of common stock that were included in computing the
dilutive potential shares of common stock used in diluted income (loss) attributable to Exterran
stockholders per common share (in thousands):
|
||||||||
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding-used in basic income (loss) per
common share |
61,836 | 61,209 | ||||||
Net dilutive potential common stock issuable: |
||||||||
On exercise of options and vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units |
695 | ** | ||||||
On settlement of employee stock purchase plan shares |
15 | ** | ||||||
On exercise of warrants |
** | | ||||||
On conversion of 4.25% convertible senior notes due 2014 |
** | | ||||||
On conversion of 4.75% convertible senior notes due 2014 |
** | ** | ||||||
Weighted average common shares and dilutive potential common shares-used in diluted
income per common share |
62,546 | 61,209 | ||||||
** | Excluded from diluted income (loss) per common share as the effect would have been anti-dilutive. |
There were no adjustments to net income attributable to Exterran stockholders for the diluted
earnings per share calculation for the three months ended March 31, 2010 or 2009.
8
Table of Contents
The table below indicates the potential shares of common stock issuable that were excluded from net
dilutive potential shares of common stock issuable as their effect would have been anti-dilutive
(in thousands):
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net dilutive potential common shares issuable: |
||||||||
On exercise of options where exercise price is greater than average market value
for the period |
1,496 | 1,830 | ||||||
On exercise of options and vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock units |
| 433 | ||||||
On settlement of employee stock purchase plan shares |
| 46 | ||||||
On exercise of warrants |
2,808 | | ||||||
On conversion of 4.25% convertible senior notes due 2014 |
15,334 | | ||||||
On conversion of 4.75% convertible senior notes due 2014 |
3,114 | 3,114 | ||||||
Net dilutive potential common shares issuable |
22,752 | 5,423 | ||||||
Financial Instruments
Our financial instruments include cash, restricted cash, receivables, payables, interest rate
swaps, foreign currency hedges and debt. At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the estimated
fair value of such financial instruments, except for debt, approximated their carrying value as
reflected in our consolidated balance sheets. As a result of the current credit environment, we
believe that the fair value of our floating rate debt does not approximate its carrying value as of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 because the applicable margin on our floating rate debt was
below the market rates as of these dates. The fair value of our fixed rate debt has been estimated
primarily based on quoted market prices. The fair value of our floating rate debt has been
estimated based on similar debt transactions that occurred near March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009. A summary of the fair value and carrying value of our debt as of March 31, 2010 and December
31, 2009 is shown in the table below (in thousands):
As of March 31, 2010 | As of December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Carrying | |||||||||||||||
Amount | Fair Value | Amount | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Fixed rate debt |
$ | 413,445 | $ | 447,206 | $ | 409,506 | $ | 423,696 | ||||||||
Floating rate debt |
1,730,500 | 1,642,589 | 1,851,430 | 1,739,456 | ||||||||||||
Total debt |
$ | 2,143,945 | $ | 2,089,795 | $ | 2,260,936 | $ | 2,163,152 | ||||||||
GAAP requires that all derivative instruments (including certain derivative instruments embedded in
other contracts) be recognized in the balance sheet at fair value, and that changes in such fair
values be recognized in earnings (loss) unless specific hedging criteria are met. Changes in the
values of derivatives that meet these hedging criteria will ultimately offset related earnings
effects of the hedged item pending recognition in earnings.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the prior financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2010
financial statement classification. These reclassifications have no impact on our consolidated
results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
2. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
In May 2009, the Venezuelan government enacted a law that reserves to the State of Venezuela
certain assets and services related to hydrocarbon primary activities, which included substantially
all of our assets and services in Venezuela. The law provides that the reserved activities are to
be performed by the State, by the State-owned oil company, Petroleos de Venezuela S.A. (PDVSA),
or its affiliates, or through mixed companies under the control of PDVSA or its affiliates. The law
authorizes PDVSA or its affiliates to take possession of the assets and take over control of those
operations related to the reserved activities as a step prior to the commencement of an
expropriation process, and permits the national executive of Venezuela to decree the total or
partial expropriation of shares or assets of companies performing those services.
On June 2, 2009, PDVSA commenced taking possession of our assets and operations in a number of our
locations in Venezuela. By the end of the second quarter of 2009, PDVSA had assumed control over
substantially all of our assets and operations in Venezuela.
9
Table of Contents
While the law provides that companies whose assets are expropriated in this manner may be
compensated in cash or securities, we are unable to predict what, if any, compensation Venezuela
will ultimately offer in exchange for any such expropriated assets and, accordingly, we are unable
to predict what, if any, compensation we ultimately will receive. We reserve and will continue to
reserve the right to seek full compensation for any and all expropriated assets and investments
under all applicable legal regimes, including investment treaties and customary international law.
In this connection, on June 16, 2009, we delivered to the Venezuelan government and PDVSA an
official notice of dispute relating to the seized assets and investments under the Agreement
between Spain and Venezuela for the Reciprocal Promotion and Protection of Investments and under
Venezuelan law. On March 23, 2010, we filed a request for the institution of an arbitration
proceeding against Venezuela with the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes
related to the seized assets and investments. We maintained insurance for the risk of expropriation
of our investments in Venezuela, subject to a policy limit of $50 million. During the year ended
December 31, 2009, we recorded a receivable of $50 million related to this insurance policy because
we determined that recovery under this policy of a portion of our loss was probable. We collected
the $50 million under our policy in January 2010. Under the terms of the insurance policy, certain
compensation we may receive from the Venezuelan government or PDVSA for our expropriated assets and
operations will be applied first to the reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses incurred by us and
the insurance company, second to the insurance company until the $50 million payment has been
repaid and third to us.
We believe the fair value of our seized Venezuelan operations substantially exceeds the historical
cost-based carrying value of the assets, including the goodwill allocable to those operations;
however, GAAP requires that our claim be accounted for as a gain contingency with no benefit being
recorded until resolved. Accordingly, we did not include any compensation we may receive for our
seized assets and operations from Venezuela in recording the loss on expropriation.
The expropriation of our business in Venezuela meets the criteria established for recognition as
discontinued operations under accounting standards for presentation of financial statements.
Therefore, our Venezuela contract operations and aftermarket services businesses are now reflected
as discontinued operations in our consolidated statements of operations.
In January 2010, the Venezuelan government announced a devaluation of the Venezuelan bolivar. This
devaluation resulted in a translation gain of approximately $12.2 million on the remeasurement of
our net liability position in Venezuela. The functional currency of our Venezuela subsidiary is the
U.S. dollar and we had more liabilities than assets denominated in bolivars in Venezuela at the
time of the devaluation. The exchange rate used to remeasure our net liabilities changed from 2.15
bolivars per U.S. dollar at December 31, 2009 to 4.3 bolivars per U.S. dollar in January 2010.
The table below summarizes the operating results of the discontinued operations (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Revenues |
$ | 228 | $ | 34,681 | ||||
Expenses and selling, general and administrative |
1,056 | 31,047 | ||||||
Expropriation related loss (recovery) |
(300 | ) | | |||||
Other (income) loss, net |
(12,141 | ) | (4,299 | ) | ||||
Provision for income taxes |
1,188 | 6,127 | ||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax. |
$ | 10,425 | $ | 1,806 | ||||
10
Table of Contents
The table below summarizes the balance sheet data for discontinued operations (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cash |
$ | 5,560 | $ | 1,841 | ||||
Accounts receivable |
127 | 177 | ||||||
Political risk insurance receivable |
| 50,000 | ||||||
Inventory |
125 | 169 | ||||||
Other current assets |
3,281 | 5,965 | ||||||
Total current assets associated with discontinued operations |
9,093 | 58,152 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
611 | 386 | ||||||
Other long-term assets |
6,465 | | ||||||
Total assets associated with discontinued operations |
$ | 16,169 | $ | 58,538 | ||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 3,886 | $ | 9,543 | ||||
Accrued liabilities |
13,070 | 12,336 | ||||||
Deferred revenues |
9,069 | | ||||||
Total current liabilities associated with discontinued operations |
26,025 | 21,879 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
11,932 | 16,667 | ||||||
Total liabilities associated with discontinued operations |
$ | 37,957 | $ | 38,546 | ||||
3. INVENTORY
Inventory, net of reserves, consisted of the following amounts (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Parts and supplies |
$ | 272,241 | $ | 284,849 | ||||
Work in progress |
168,971 | 154,763 | ||||||
Finished goods |
47,112 | 50,370 | ||||||
Inventory, net of reserves |
$ | 488,324 | $ | 489,982 | ||||
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had inventory reserves of $17.9 million and $18.4
million, respectively.
4. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Compression equipment, facilities and other fleet assets |
$ | 4,367,794 | $ | 4,355,915 | ||||
Land and buildings |
172,122 | 174,004 | ||||||
Transportation and shop equipment |
206,385 | 207,035 | ||||||
Other |
127,799 | 125,435 | ||||||
4,874,100 | 4,862,389 | |||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
(1,521,446 | ) | (1,458,035 | ) | ||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
$ | 3,352,654 | $ | 3,404,354 | ||||
5. INVESTMENTS IN NON-CONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES
Investments in affiliates that are not controlled by Exterran but where we have the ability to
exercise significant influence over the operations are accounted for using the equity method. Our
share of net income or losses of these affiliates is reflected in the consolidated statements of
operations as equity in loss of non-consolidated affiliates. Our primary equity method investments
have been primarily comprised of entities that own, operate, service and maintain compression and
other related facilities, as well as water injection plants.
11
Table of Contents
Our ownership interest and location of each equity method investee at March 31, 2010 is as follows:
Ownership | ||||||||
Interest | Location | Type of Business | ||||||
PIGAP II |
30.0% | Venezuela | Gas Compression Plant | |||||
El Furrial |
33.3% | Venezuela | Gas Compression Plant |
We also had a 35.5% ownership interest in each of the SIMCO Consortium and Harwat that we sold in
November 2009. The SIMCO Consortium and Harwat operate a water injection plant in Venezuela. The
summarized financial information in the table below includes the investees listed above as well as
the SIMCO Consortium and Harwat through their disposition date in November 2009.
Summarized combined earnings information for these entities consisted of the following amounts (on
a 100% basis, in thousands):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Revenues |
$ | | $ | 6,824 | ||||
Operating income (loss) |
16,733 | (243,167 | ) | |||||
Net income (loss) |
14,599 | (225,960 | ) |
Due to unresolved disputes with its only customer, PDVSA, SIMCO sent a notice to PDVSA in the
fourth quarter of 2008 stating that SIMCO might not be able to continue to fund its operations if
some of its outstanding disputes were not resolved and paid in the near future. On February 25,
2009, the Venezuelan National Guard occupied SIMCOs facilities and during March 2009 transitioned
the operation of SIMCO, including the hiring of SIMCOs employees, to PDVSA.
During the first quarter of 2009, we determined that the expected proceeds from our investment in
the SIMCO Consortium and Harwat would be less than the book value of our investment and, as a
result, that the fair value of our investment had declined and the loss in value was not temporary.
Therefore, we recorded an impairment charge in the first quarter of 2009 of $6.5 million, which is
reflected as a charge in equity in loss of non-consolidated affiliates in our consolidated
statements of operations.
Due to lack of payments from their only customer, PDVSA, PIGAP II and El Furrial each sent a notice
of default to PDVSA in April 2009. PIGAP IIs and El Furrials debt was in technical default
triggered by past due payments from their sole customer under their related services contracts. As
a result of PDVSAs nonpayment, in March 2009 these joint ventures recorded impairments on their
assets. Accordingly, we reviewed our expected cash flows related to these two joint ventures and
determined in March 2009 that the fair value of our investment in PIGAP II and El Furrial had
declined and that we had a loss in our investment that was not temporary. Therefore, we recorded an
impairment charge of $90.1 million ($81.7 million net of tax) to write-off our investments in PIGAP
II and El Furrial. These impairment charges are reflected as a charge in equity in loss of
non-consolidated affiliates in our consolidated statements of operations. In May 2009, PDVSA
assumed control over the assets of PIGAP II and El Furrial and transitioned the operations of PIGAP
II and El Furrial, including the hiring of their employees, to PDVSA. Our non-consolidated
affiliates are expected to seek full compensation for any and all expropriated assets and
investments under all applicable legal regimes, including investment treaties and customary
international law, which could result in us recording a gain on our investment in future periods.
However, we are unable to predict what, if any, compensation we ultimately will receive.
Because the assets and operations of our investments in our remaining non-consolidated affiliates
have been expropriated, we currently do not expect to have significant, if any, equity earnings in
non-consolidated affiliates in the future from these investments.
12
Table of Contents
6. DEBT
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Revolving credit facility due August 2012 |
$ | | $ | 68,929 | ||||
Term loan |
770,000 | 780,000 | ||||||
2007 asset-backed securitization facility notes due July 2012 |
530,000 | 570,000 | ||||||
Partnerships revolving credit facility due October 2011 |
283,000 | 285,000 | ||||||
Partnerships term loan facility due October 2011 |
117,500 | 117,500 | ||||||
Partnerships asset-backed securitization facility notes due July 2013 |
30,000 | 30,000 | ||||||
4.75% convertible senior notes due January 2014 |
143,750 | 143,750 | ||||||
4.25% convertible senior notes due June 2014 (presented net of the
unamortized discount of $85.6 million and $89.5 million, respectively) |
269,422 | 265,469 | ||||||
Other, interest at various rates, collateralized by equipment and other assets |
273 | 288 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
$ | 2,143,945 | $ | 2,260,936 | ||||
In June 2009, we issued under our shelf registration statement $355.0 million aggregate principal
amount of 4.25% convertible senior notes due June 2014 (the 4.25% Notes), including $30.0 million
principal amount issued pursuant to the underwriters overallotment option. The 4.25% Notes are
convertible upon the occurrence of certain conditions into shares of our common stock at an initial
conversion rate of 43.1951 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the
convertible notes, equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $23.15 per share of
common stock. The conversion rate will be subject to adjustment following certain dilutive events
and certain corporate transactions. The 4.25% Notes intrinsic value exceeded their principal
amount as of March 31, 2010 by $15.6 million. We may not redeem the notes prior to the maturity
date of the notes.
GAAP requires that the liability and equity components of certain convertible debt instruments that
may be settled in cash upon conversion be separately accounted for in a manner that reflects an
issuers nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. Upon issuance of our 4.25% Notes, $97.9 million was
recorded as a debt discount and reflected in equity related to the convertible feature of these
notes. The unamortized discount on the 4.25% Notes will be amortized using the effective interest
method through June 30, 2014. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we recognized
$3.8 million of interest expense related to the contractual interest coupon and $4.0 million of
amortization of the debt discount, respectively. The effective interest rate on the debt component
of these notes was 11.67% for the three months ended March 31, 2010.
As of March 31, 2010, our senior secured borrowings consisted of our asset-backed securitization
facility (the 2007 ABS Facility), the term loan and our revolving credit facility. At March 31,
2010, we had undrawn capacity of $566.0 million and $270.0 million under our revolving credit
facility and 2007 ABS Facility, respectively. Our senior secured credit agreement (the Credit
Agreement) limits our total outstanding Senior Secured Debt to EBITDA ratio (as defined in the
Credit Agreement) to be not greater than 4.0 to 1.0. Due to this limitation, only $668.5 million of
the combined $836.0 million of undrawn capacity under both facilities was available for additional
borrowings as of March 31, 2010. Further, as of March 31, 2010, only $108.5 million of
the $270.0 million in unfunded commitments under our 2007 ABS Facility was available due to certain
covenant limitations under the facility, assuming such facility was fully funded with all eligible
contract compression assets available at that time. If our operations within Exterran ABS 2007 LLC (along with
its subsidiary, Exterran ABS) experience additional reductions in cash flows, the amount
available for additional borrowings could be further reduced. If the outstanding borrowings exceed
the amount allowed based on the limitations, we can utilize either certain cash flows from Exterran
ABSs operations or borrowings under our revolving credit facility, or a combination of both, to
reduce the amount of borrowings outstanding to the amount allowed pursuant to the limitations.
As of March 31, 2010, our subsidiary, Exterran Partners L.P. (together with its subsidiaries, the
Partnership), had undrawn capacity of $32.0 million and $120.0 million under its revolving credit
facility and asset-backed securitization facility, respectively. Due to limitations under the Partnerships senior
secured credit agreement (the Partnership Credit Agreement) on the Partnerships total
outstanding senior secured borrowings, only approximately $106.7 million of the combined
$152.0 million of undrawn capacity under both facilities would have been available for additional
borrowings as of March 31, 2010.
Our bank credit facilities, asset-backed securitization facilities and the agreements governing
certain of our other indebtedness include various covenants with which we must comply, including,
but not limited to, limitations on incurrence of indebtedness, investments,
13
Table of Contents
liens on assets, transactions with affiliates, mergers, consolidations, sales of assets and other
provisions customary in similar types of agreements. For example, under our Credit Agreement we
must maintain various consolidated financial ratios including a ratio of EBITDA (as defined in the
Credit Agreement) to Total Interest Expense (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of not less than
2.25 to 1.0, a ratio of consolidated Total Debt (as defined in the Credit Agreement) to EBITDA of
not greater than 5.0 to 1.0 and a ratio of Senior Secured Debt (as defined in the Credit Agreement)
to EBITDA of not greater than 4.0 to 1.0. As of March 31, 2010, we maintained a 5.7 to 1.0 EBITDA
to Total Interest Expense ratio, a 3.5 to 1.0 consolidated Total Debt to EBITDA ratio and a 2.7 to
1.0 Senior Secured Debt to EBITDA ratio. If we fail to remain in compliance with our financial
covenants we would be in default under our credit agreements. In addition, if we experienced a
material adverse effect on our assets, liabilities, financial condition, business, operations or
prospects that, taken as a whole, impacts our ability to perform our obligations under our credit
agreements, this could lead to a default under our credit agreements. A default under one or more
of our debt agreements, including a default by the Partnership under its credit facilities, would
trigger cross-default provisions under certain of our debt agreements, which would accelerate our
obligation to repay our indebtedness under those agreements. As of March 31, 2010, we were in
compliance with all financial covenants under our credit agreements.
The Partnership Credit Agreement contains various covenants with which the Partnership must comply,
including restrictions on the use of proceeds from borrowings and limitations on its ability to
incur additional debt or sell assets, make certain investments and acquisitions, grant liens and
pay dividends and distributions. The Partnership must maintain various consolidated financial
ratios, including a ratio of EBITDA (as defined in the Partnership Credit Agreement) to Total
Interest Expense (as defined in the Partnership Credit Agreement) of not less than 2.5 to 1.0, and
a ratio of Total Debt (as defined in the Partnership Credit Agreement) to EBITDA of not greater
than 5.0 to 1.0. The Partnership Credit Agreement allows for the Partnerships Total Debt to EBITDA
ratio to be increased from 5.0 to 1.0 to 5.5 to 1.0 during a quarter when an acquisition meeting
certain thresholds is completed and for the following two quarters after the acquisition closes.
Therefore, because the November 2009 Contract Operations Acquisition (as defined in Part I, Item 2
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations below)
closed in the fourth quarter of 2009 and met the applicable thresholds, the maximum allowed ratio
of Total Debt to EBITDA was increased from 5.0 to 1.0 to 5.5 to 1.0 for the quarters ending
December 31, 2009, March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010. After June 30, 2010, the Partnerships
required Total Debt to EBITDA ratio will revert back to 5.0 to 1.0. As of March 31, 2010, the
Partnership maintained a 4.7 to 1.0 EBITDA to Total Interest Expense ratio and a 4.4 to 1.0 Total
Debt to EBITDA ratio. If the Partnership experiences a deterioration in the demand for its services
and is unable to consummate further acquisitions from us, amend its senior secured credit facility
or restructure its debt, it estimates that it could be in violation of the maximum Total Debt to
EBITDA covenant ratio contained in its senior secured credit facility in 2010. A violation of the
Partnerships Total Debt to EBITDA covenant would be an event of default under the Partnership
Credit Agreement which would trigger cross-default provisions under certain of our debt agreements.
As of March 31, 2010, the Partnership was in compliance with all financial covenants under the
Partnership Credit Agreement.
7. ACCOUNTING FOR DERIVATIVES
We are exposed to market risks primarily associated with changes in interest rates and foreign
currency exchange rates. We use derivative financial instruments to minimize the risks and/or costs
associated with financial activities by managing our exposure to interest rate fluctuations on a
portion of our debt obligations. We also use derivative financial instruments to minimize the risks
caused by currency fluctuations in certain foreign currencies. We do not use derivative financial
instruments for trading or other speculative purposes.
Interest Rate Risk
At March 31, 2010, we were a party to interest rate swaps in which we pay fixed payments and
receive floating payments on a notional value of $1,450.0 million. We entered into these swaps to
offset changes in expected cash flows due to fluctuations in the associated variable interest
rates. Our interest rate swaps expire over varying dates, with interest rate swaps having a
notional amount of $1,379.7 million expiring through January 2013 and the remaining interest rate
swaps expiring through October 2019. The weighted average effective fixed interest rate payable on
our interest rate swaps was 4.1% as of March 31, 2010. We have designated these interest rate swaps
as cash flow hedging instruments so that any change in their fair values is recognized as a
component of comprehensive income (loss) and is included in accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss) to the extent the hedge is effective. The swap terms substantially coincide with the hedged
item and are expected to offset changes in expected cash flows due to fluctuations in the variable
rate, and therefore we currently do not expect a significant amount of ineffectiveness on these
hedges. We perform quarterly calculations to determine whether the swap agreements are still
effective and to calculate any ineffectiveness. We recorded approximately $0.1 million and $0.2
million of interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, due
to the ineffectiveness related to these swaps. We estimate that approximately $49.3 million of
deferred pre-tax
14
Table of Contents
losses, included in our accumulated other comprehensive loss at March 31, 2010 will be reclassified
into earnings as interest expense at then-current values during the next twelve months as the
underlying hedged transactions occur. Cash flows from derivatives designated as hedges are
classified in our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows under the same category as the
cash flows from the underlying assets, liabilities or anticipated transactions.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
We operate in over 30 countries throughout the world, and a fluctuation in the value of the
currencies of these countries relative to the U.S. dollar could impact our profits from
international operations and the value of the net assets of our international operations when
reported in U.S. dollars in our financial statements. From time to time we may enter into foreign
currency hedges to reduce our foreign exchange risk associated with cash flows we will receive in a
currency other than the functional currency of the local Exterran affiliate that entered into the
contract. The impact of foreign currency exchange on our condensed consolidated statements of
operations will depend on the amount of our net asset and liability positions exposed to currency
fluctuations in future periods.
Foreign currency hedges that meet the hedging requirements or that qualify for hedge accounting
treatment are accounted for as cash flow hedges and changes in the fair value are recognized as a
component of comprehensive income (loss) to the extent the hedge is effective. The amounts
recognized as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) will be reclassified into earnings
(loss) in the periods in which the underlying foreign currency exchange transaction is recognized.
For foreign currency hedges that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, changes in fair
value and gains and losses on settlement are included in other (income) expense, net in our
condensed consolidated statements of operations.
The following tables present the effect of derivative instruments on our consolidated financial
position and results of operations (in thousands):
March 31, 2010 | ||||||
Fair Value | ||||||
Balance Sheet Location | Asset (Liability) | |||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||
Interest rate hedges |
Intangibles and other assets | $ | 170 | |||
Interest rate hedges |
Accrued liabilities | (49,277 | ) | |||
Interest rate hedges |
Other long-term liabilities | (35,757 | ) | |||
Total derivatives |
$ | (84,864 | ) | |||
December 31, 2009 | ||||||
Fair Value | ||||||
Balance Sheet Location | Asset (Liability) | |||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||
Interest rate hedges |
Intangibles and other assets | $ | 262 | |||
Interest rate hedges |
Accrued liabilities | (48,421 | ) | |||
Interest rate hedges |
Other long-term liabilities | (35,300 | ) | |||
Total derivatives |
$ | (83,459 | ) | |||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 | ||||||||||
Gain (Loss) | ||||||||||
Reclassified | ||||||||||
from | ||||||||||
Gain (Loss) | Accumulated | |||||||||
Recognized in | Other | |||||||||
Other | Location of Gain (Loss) | Comprehensive | ||||||||
Comprehensive | Reclassified from Accumulated | Income (Loss) | ||||||||
Income (Loss) on | Other Comprehensive Income | into Income | ||||||||
Derivatives | (Loss) into Income (Loss) | (Loss) | ||||||||
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges: |
||||||||||
Interest rate hedges |
$ | (15,179 | ) | Interest expense | $ | (14,312 | ) |
15
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 | ||||||||||
Gain (Loss) | ||||||||||
Reclassified | ||||||||||
from | ||||||||||
Gain (Loss) | Accumulated | |||||||||
Recognized in | Other | |||||||||
Other | Location of Gain (Loss) | Comprehensive | ||||||||
Comprehensive | Reclassified from Accumulated | Income (Loss) | ||||||||
Income (Loss) on | Other Comprehensive Income | into Income | ||||||||
Derivatives | (Loss) into Income (Loss) | (Loss) | ||||||||
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges: |
||||||||||
Interest rate hedges |
$ | (15,552 | ) | Interest expense | $ | (12,395 | ) | |||
Foreign currency hedge |
549 | Fabrication revenue | (253 | ) | ||||||
Totals |
$ | (15,003 | ) | $ | (12,648 | ) | ||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 | ||||||
Amount of Gain | ||||||
(Loss) | ||||||
Location of Gain (Loss) | Recognized in | |||||
Recognized in Income (Loss) on | Income (Loss) | |||||
Derivative | on Derivative | |||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||
Foreign currency hedge |
Other income (expense), net | $ | (380 | ) | ||
The counterparties to our derivative agreements are major international financial institutions. We
monitor the credit quality of these financial institutions and do not expect non-performance by any
counterparty, although such non-performance could have a material adverse effect on us. We have no
specific collateral posted for our derivative instruments. The counterparties to our interest rate
swaps are also lenders under our credit facilities and/or our ABS facilities and, in that capacity,
share proportionally in the collateral pledged under the related facility.
8. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The accounting standard for fair value measurements and disclosures establishes a fair value
hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into the
following three broad categories.
| Level 1 Quoted unadjusted prices for identical instruments in active markets to which we have access at the date of measurement. | |
| Level 2 Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets. Level 2 inputs are those in markets for which there are few transactions, the prices are not current, little public information exists or prices vary substantially over time or among brokered market makers. | |
| Level 3 Model derived valuations in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable. Unobservable inputs are those inputs that reflect our own assumptions regarding how market participants would price the asset or liability based on the best available information. |
The following table summarizes the valuation of our interest rate swaps and impaired assets as of
and for the three months ended March 31, 2010 with pricing levels as of the date of valuation (in
thousands):
Quoted | ||||||||||||||||
Market | ||||||||||||||||
Prices in | Significant | Significant | ||||||||||||||
Active | Other | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Markets | Observable | Inputs | ||||||||||||||
Total | (Level 1) | Inputs (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps asset (liability) |
$ | (84,864 | ) | $ | | $ | (84,864 | ) | $ | | ||||||
Impairment of long-lived assets |
360 | | | 360 |
16
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes the valuation of our interest rate swaps and impaired assets as
of and for the three months ended March 31, 2009 with pricing levels as of the date of valuation
(in thousands):
Quoted | ||||||||||||||||
Market | Significant | |||||||||||||||
Prices in | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
Active | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Markets | Inputs | Inputs | ||||||||||||||
Total | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps asset (liability) |
$ | (104,570 | ) | $ | | $ | (104,570 | ) | $ | | ||||||
Foreign currency derivatives asset (liability) |
(2,331 | ) | | (2,331 | ) | | ||||||||||
Investments in non-consolidated affiliates |
1,217 | | | 1,217 | ||||||||||||
Impairment of manufacturing facilities |
8,400 | | 8,400 | |
Our interest rate swaps and foreign currency derivatives are recorded at fair value utilizing a
combination of the market and income approach to fair value. We used discounted cash flows and
market based methods to compare similar derivative instruments. Our estimate of the fair value of
the long-lived assets impaired was based on the estimated component value of the equipment that we plan
to use. Our estimate of the fair value of our investments in non-consolidated affiliates was based
on discounted cash flow models that use probability weighted estimated cash flows to estimate the
fair value of our investment in these non-consolidated affiliates. The primary inputs for the cash
flow models were estimates of cash flows from operations we received from management of the joint
ventures and our estimates of final proceeds that we would ultimately
receive. Our estimate of the fair value of the impaired manufacturing
facilities was based on sales of similar assets.
9. LONG-LIVED ASSET IMPAIRMENT
As a result of a decline in market conditions
in North America during 2010
and 2009, we reviewed for impairment our compression assets that had been previously removed from our available
fleet and were to be disposed of.
We performed a cash flow analysis
of the expected proceeds from the disposition of these units to determine the fair value of the assets.
For the first quarter of 2010, the net
book value of these assets exceeded the fair value by $1.7 million and was recorded as a long-lived
asset impairment.
In the first quarter of 2009, our management
approved a plan to close certain fabrication facilities and consolidate our compression fabrication
activities (see Note 10). As a result, we reviewed the facilities to be closed for impairment and
the net book value of these facilities exceeded the fair value by $5.6 million and was recorded as a
long-lived asset impairment. The consolidation of those compression fabrication activities was completed
in September 2009.
10. RESTRUCTURING CHARGES
As a result of the reduced level of demand for our products and services, our management approved a
plan in March 2009 to close certain facilities to consolidate our compression fabrication
activities. These actions were the result of significant fabrication
capacity stemming from the 2007 merger that created Exterran and the lack of consolidation of this
capacity since that time, as well as the anticipated continuation of weaker global economic and
energy industry conditions. The consolidation of those compression fabrication activities was
completed in September 2009. Restructuring charges in the first quarter of 2009 included a $5.6
million facility impairment charge which was reflected in our
consolidated statement of operations as a Long-lived asset impairment (see Note 9). Additionally, we reduced the size of our workforce at our two
manufacturing locations in Houston, Texas to support the forecasted level of new fabrication work.
11. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Stock Incentive Plan
On August 20, 2007, we adopted the Exterran Holdings, Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended
and restated, the 2007 Plan), which previously had been approved by the stockholders of Hanover
Compressor Company and Universal Compression Holdings, Inc. and provides for the granting of
stock-based awards in the form of options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock
appreciation rights and performance awards to our employees and directors. In May 2010, our
stockholders approved an amendment to the 2007 Plan which increased the aggregate number of shares
of common stock that may be issued under the 2007 Plan from 6,750,000 to 9,750,000. Each option and
stock appreciation right granted counts as one share against the aggregate share limit, and each
share of restricted stock and restricted stock unit granted counts as two shares against the
aggregate share limit. Awards granted under the 2007 Plan that are subsequently cancelled,
terminated or forfeited are available for future grant.
17
Table of Contents
Stock Options
Under the 2007 Plan, stock options are granted at fair market value at the date of grant, are
exercisable in accordance with the vesting schedule established by the compensation committee of
our board of directors in its sole discretion and expire no later than seven years after the date
of grant. Options generally vest 33 1/3% on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant
date.
The weighted average fair value at date of grant for options granted during the three months ended
March 31, 2010 was $8.71, and was estimated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model with the
following weighted average assumptions:
Three Months | ||||
Ended | ||||
March 31, 2010 | ||||
Expected life in years |
4.5 | |||
Risk-free interest rate |
2.16 | % | ||
Volatility |
42.90 | % | ||
Dividend yield |
0.00 | % |
The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the
grant for a period commensurate with the estimated expected life of the stock options. Expected
volatility is based on the historical volatility of our stock over the most recent period
commensurate with the expected life of the stock options and other factors. We have not
historically paid a dividend and do not expect to pay a dividend during the expected life of the
stock options.
The following table presents stock option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2010 (in
thousands, except per share data and remaining life in years):
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Average | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||
Stock | Average | Remaining | Intrinsic | |||||||||||||
Options | Exercise Price | Life | Value | |||||||||||||
Options outstanding, December 31, 2009 |
2,833 | $ | 33.37 | |||||||||||||
Granted |
669 | 22.77 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised |
(26 | ) | 16.25 | |||||||||||||
Cancelled |
(78 | ) | 43.27 | |||||||||||||
Options outstanding, March 31, 2010 |
3,398 | $ | 31.18 | 5.0 | $ | 9,598 | ||||||||||
Options exercisable, March 31, 2010 |
1,990 | $ | 35.91 | 4.2 | $ | 4,362 | ||||||||||
Intrinsic value is the difference between the market value of our stock and the exercise price of
each option multiplied by the number of options outstanding for those options where the market
value exceeds their exercise price. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the
three months ended March 31, 2010 was $0.3 million. As of March 31, 2010, $17.8 million of
unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options is expected to be recognized over
the weighted-average period of 2.3 years.
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units
For grants of restricted stock and restricted stock units, we recognize compensation expense over
the vesting period equal to the fair value of our common stock at the date of grant. Common stock
subject to restricted stock grants generally vests 33 1/3% on each of the first three anniversaries
of the grant date.
The following table presents restricted stock and restricted stock unit activity for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 (in thousands, except per share data):
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Grant-Date | ||||||||
Fair Value | ||||||||
Shares | Per Share | |||||||
Non-vested restricted stock and restricted stock units, December 31, 2009 |
1,162 | $ | 28.15 | |||||
Granted |
747 | 22.82 | ||||||
Vested |
(371 | ) | 28.50 | |||||
Cancelled |
(25 | ) | 31.74 | |||||
Non-vested restricted stock and restricted stock units, March 31, 2010 |
1,513 | $ | 25.38 | |||||
18
Table of Contents
As of March 31, 2010, $25.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested
restricted stock and restricted stock units is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average
period of 2.3 years.
The compensation committees practice is to grant
equity-based awards once a year, in late February or early March after fourth quarter earnings information
for the prior year has been released for at least two full trading days. The schedule for making equity-based
awards is typically established several months in advance, and is not set based on knowledge of material
nonpublic information or in response to our stock price. This practice results in awards being granted on a
regular, predictable annual cycle, after annual earnings information has been disseminated to the marketplace.
Equity-based awards are occasionally granted at other times during the year, such as upon the hiring of a
new employee or following the promotion of an employee. In some instances, the compensation committee may
be aware, at the time grants are made, of matters or potential developments that are not ripe for public
disclosure at that time but that may result in public announcement of material information at a later date.
In February 2010, the compensation committee of our board of directors authorized annual long-term incentive
awards of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance shares to our executive
officers, other employees and non-employee directors.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
On August 20, 2007, we adopted the Exterran Holdings, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP),
which is intended to provide employees with an opportunity to participate in our long-term
performance and success through the purchase of shares of common stock at a price that may be less
than fair market value. The ESPP is designed to comply with Section 423 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended. Each quarter, an eligible employee may elect to withhold a portion of his
or her salary up to the lesser of $25,000 per year or 10% of his or her eligible pay to purchase
shares of our common stock at a price equal to 85% to 100% of the fair market value of the stock as
of the first trading day of the quarter, the last trading day of the quarter or the lower of the
first trading day of the quarter and the last trading day of the quarter, as the compensation
committee of our board of directors may determine. The ESPP will terminate on the date that all
shares of common stock authorized for sale under the ESPP have been purchased, unless it is
extended. A total of 650,000 shares of our common stock have been authorized and reserved for
issuance under the ESPP. At March 31, 2010, 342,938 shares remained available for purchase under
the ESPP. Our ESPP plan is compensatory and, as a result, we record an expense on our consolidated
statements of operations related to the ESPP. Effective July 1, 2009, the purchase discount under
the ESPP was reduced from 15% to 5% of the fair market value of our common stock on the first
trading day of the quarter or the last trading day of the quarter, whichever is lower.
Partnership Long-Term Incentive Plan
The Partnership has a long-term incentive plan that was adopted by Exterran GP LLC, the general
partner of the Partnerships general partner, in October 2006 for employees, directors and
consultants of the Partnership, us or our respective affiliates. The long-term incentive plan
currently permits the grant of awards covering an aggregate of 1,035,378 common units, common unit
options, restricted units and phantom units. The long-term incentive plan is administered by the
board of directors of Exterran GP LLC or a committee thereof (the Plan Administrator).
Unit options will have an exercise price that is not less than the fair market value of a common
unit on the date of grant and will become exercisable over a period determined by the Plan
Administrator. Phantom units are notional units that entitle the grantee to receive a common unit
upon the vesting of the phantom unit or, at the discretion of the Plan Administrator, cash equal to
the fair value of a common unit.
Partnership Phantom Units
During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Partnership granted 29,634 phantom units to officers
and directors of Exterran GP LLC and certain of our employees, which settle 33 1/3% on each of the
first three anniversaries of the grant date.
The following table presents phantom unit activity for the three months ended March 31, 2010:
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Grant-Date | ||||||||
Phantom | Fair Value | |||||||
Units | per Unit | |||||||
Phantom units outstanding, December 31, 2009 |
91,124 | $ | 17.06 | |||||
Granted |
29,634 | 22.88 | ||||||
Vested |
(33,373 | ) | 18.18 | |||||
Cancelled |
(2,065 | ) | 17.26 | |||||
Phantom units outstanding, March 31, 2010 |
85,320 | $ | 18.60 | |||||
As of March 31, 2010, $1.5 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested phantom
units is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average period of 2.2 years.
19
Table of Contents
12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We have issued the following guarantees that are not recorded on our accompanying balance sheet
(dollars in thousands):
Maximum Potential | ||||||||
Undiscounted | ||||||||
Payments as of | ||||||||
Term | March 31, 2010 | |||||||
Performance guarantees through letters of credit(1) |
2010 2013 | $ | 294,161 | |||||
Standby letters of credit |
2010 2011 | 19,449 | ||||||
Commercial letters of credit |
2010 | 1,032 | ||||||
Bid bonds and performance bonds(1) |
2010 2016 | 123,372 | ||||||
Maximum potential undiscounted payments |
$ | 438,014 | ||||||
(1) | We have issued guarantees to third parties to ensure performance of our obligations, some of which may be fulfilled by third parties. |
As part of our acquisition of Production Operators Corporation in 2001, we may be required to make
contingent payments of up to $46 million to Schlumberger dependent on the realization by us of
certain U.S. federal tax benefits through the year 2016. To date, we have not realized any such
benefits that would require a payment to Schlumberger and do not anticipate realizing any such
benefits that would require a payment before the year 2013.
In January 2008, we acquired GLR Solutions Ltd. (GLR), a Canadian provider of water treatment
products for the upstream petroleum and other industries, for approximately $25 million plus
certain working capital adjustments and contingent payments based on the performance of GLR. In
April 2009, we paid approximately $3.6 million Canadian based on GLRs performance for the year
ended December 31, 2008 and we may be required to pay up to an additional $18.4 million Canadian
based on GLRs performance in 2010.
See Note 2 and Note 5 for a discussion of gain contingencies related to our claims for assets and
investments that were expropriated in Venezuela.
Our business can be hazardous, involving unforeseen circumstances such as uncontrollable flows of
natural gas or well fluids and fires or explosions. As is customary in our industry, we review our
safety equipment and procedures and carry insurance against some, but not all, risks of our
business. Our insurance coverage includes property damage, general liability and commercial
automobile liability and other coverage we believe is appropriate. In addition, we have a minimal
amount of insurance on our offshore assets. We believe that our insurance coverage is customary for
the industry and adequate for our business; however, losses and liabilities not covered by
insurance would increase our costs.
Additionally, we are substantially self-insured for workers compensation and employee group health
claims in view of the relatively high per-incident deductibles we absorb under our insurance
arrangements for these risks. Losses up to the deductible amounts are estimated and accrued based
upon known facts, historical trends and industry averages.
In the ordinary course of business, we are involved in various pending or threatened legal actions.
While management is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of these actions, we believe that any
ultimate liability arising from these actions will not have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Because of the inherent
uncertainty of
20
Table of Contents
litigation, however, we cannot provide assurance that the resolution of any particular claim or
proceeding to which we are a party will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows for the period in which the resolution
occurs.
13. RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued new guidance to require an entity to
perform an analysis to determine whether the entitys variable interest gives it a controlling
financial interest in a variable interest entity. This analysis identifies the primary beneficiary
of a variable interest entity as the entity that has both the power to direct the activities that
most significantly impact the variable interest entitys economic performance and the obligation to
absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the variable interest entity. The new guidance
also requires additional disclosures about a companys involvement in variable interest entities
and any significant changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. The new guidance is effective
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. Our adoption of this new guidance on January 1,
2010 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
14. REPORTABLE SEGMENTS
We manage our business segments primarily based upon the type of product or service provided. We
have four principal industry segments: North America contract operations, international contract
operations, aftermarket services and fabrication. The North America and international contract
operations segments primarily provide natural gas compression services, production and processing
equipment services and maintenance services to meet specific customer requirements on
Exterran-owned assets. The aftermarket services segment provides a full range of services to
support the surface production, compression and processing needs of customers, from parts sales and
normal maintenance services to full operation of a customers owned assets. The fabrication segment
involves (i) design, engineering, installation, fabrication and sale of natural gas compression
units and accessories and equipment used in the production, treating and processing of crude oil
and natural gas and (ii) engineering, procurement and construction services primarily related to
the manufacturing of critical process equipment for refinery and petrochemical facilities, the
construction of tank farms and the construction of evaporators and brine heaters for desalination
plants.
We evaluate the performance of our segments based on gross margin for each segment. Revenues
include only sales to external customers. We do not include intersegment sales when we evaluate the
performance of our segments. Our chief executive officer does not review asset information by
segment.
The following table presents sales and other financial information by industry segment for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
North | ||||||||||||||||||||
America | International | Reportable | ||||||||||||||||||
Contract | Contract | Aftermarket | Segments | |||||||||||||||||
Three months ended | Operations | Operations | Services | Fabrication | Total | |||||||||||||||
March 31, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue from external customers |
$ | 152,627 | $ | 109,740 | $ | 70,323 | $ | 243,618 | $ | 576,308 | ||||||||||
Gross margin(1) |
81,252 | 68,885 | 13,711 | 46,745 | 210,593 | |||||||||||||||
March 31, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue from external customers |
$ | 194,393 | $ | 90,679 | $ | 75,531 | $ | 342,609 | $ | 703,212 | ||||||||||
Gross margin(1) |
110,688 | 57,874 | 15,777 | 55,895 | 240,234 |
(1) | Gross margin, a non-GAAP financial measure, is reconciled to net income (loss) below. |
We define gross margin as total revenue less cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization
expense). Gross margin is included as a supplemental disclosure because it is a primary measure
used by our management as it represents the results of revenue and cost of sales (excluding
depreciation and amortization expense), which are key components of our operations. As an indicator
of our operating performance, gross margin should not be considered an alternative to, or more
meaningful than, net income (loss) as determined in accordance with GAAP. Our gross margin may not
be comparable to a similarly titled measure of another company because other entities may not
calculate gross margin in the same manner.
21
Table of Contents
The following table reconciles net income (loss) to gross margin (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 16,733 | $ | (57,900 | ) | |||
Selling, general and administrative |
84,051 | 85,111 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
91,775 | 82,073 | ||||||
Long-lived asset impairment |
1,707 | 5,600 | ||||||
Restructuring charges |
| 1,704 | ||||||
Interest expense |
32,934 | 26,734 | ||||||
Equity in loss of non-consolidated affiliates |
| 91,117 | ||||||
Other (income) expense, net |
(2,183 | ) | (3,362 | ) | ||||
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes |
(3,999 | ) | 10,963 | |||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
(10,425 | ) | (1,806 | ) | ||||
Gross margin |
$ | 210,593 | $ | 240,234 | ||||
15. CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Exterran Energy Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of Exterran Holdings, Inc., is the issuer of our
4.75% Notes. Exterran Holdings, Inc. agreed to fully and unconditionally guarantee the obligations
of Exterran Energy Corp. relating to our 4.75% Notes and as a result of this guarantee, we are
presenting the following condensed consolidating financial information pursuant to Rule 3-10 of
Regulation S-X. These schedules are presented using the equity method of accounting for all periods
presented. Under this method, investments in subsidiaries are recorded at cost and adjusted for our
share in the subsidiaries cumulative results of operations, capital contributions and
distributions and other changes in equity. Elimination entries relate primarily to the elimination
of investments in subsidiaries and associated intercompany balances and transactions.
22
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
March 31, 2010
March 31, 2010
Subsidiary | Other | |||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Issuer | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidation | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets |
$ | 1,463 | $ | 786 | $ | 1,283,260 | $ | (2,195 | ) | $ | 1,283,314 | |||||||||
Current assets associated with discontinued operations |
| | 9,093 | | 9,093 | |||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
1,463 | 786 | 1,292,353 | (2,195 | ) | 1,292,407 | ||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
| | 3,352,654 | | 3,352,654 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill, net |
| | 195,644 | | 195,644 | |||||||||||||||
Investments in affiliates |
2,027,845 | 2,180,013 | | (4,207,858 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Other assets |
864,235 | 844,684 | 248,373 | (1,693,570 | ) | 263,722 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term assets associated with discontinued operations |
| | 7,076 | | 7,076 | |||||||||||||||
Total long-term assets |
2,892,080 | 3,024,697 | 3,803,747 | (5,901,428 | ) | 3,819,096 | ||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 2,893,543 | $ | 3,025,483 | $ | 5,096,100 | $ | (5,903,623 | ) | $ | 5,111,503 | |||||||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities |
$ | 15,993 | $ | 2,854 | $ | 737,474 | $ | (1,200 | ) | $ | 755,121 | |||||||||
Current liabilities associated with discontinued operations |
| | 26,025 | | 26,025 | |||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
15,993 | 2,854 | 763,499 | (1,200 | ) | 781,146 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
1,039,422 | 143,750 | 960,773 | | 2,143,945 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany payables |
| 851,034 | 802,784 | (1,653,818 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
10,412 | | 377,099 | (40,747 | ) | 346,764 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term liabilities associated with discontinued
operations |
| | 11,932 | | 11,932 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
1,065,827 | 997,638 | 2,916,087 | (1,695,765 | ) | 3,283,787 | ||||||||||||||
Total equity |
1,827,716 | 2,027,845 | 2,180,013 | (4,207,858 | ) | 1,827,716 | ||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 2,893,543 | $ | 3,025,483 | $ | 5,096,100 | $ | (5,903,623 | ) | $ | 5,111,503 | |||||||||
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
December 31, 2009
December 31, 2009
Subsidiary | Other | |||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Issuer | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidation | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets |
$ | 1,443 | $ | 3,950 | $ | 1,360,994 | $ | (5,378 | ) | $ | 1,361,009 | |||||||||
Current assets associated with discontinued operations |
| | 58,152 | | 58,152 | |||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
1,443 | 3,950 | 1,419,146 | (5,378 | ) | 1,419,161 | ||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
| | 3,404,354 | | 3,404,354 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill, net |
| | 195,164 | | 195,164 | |||||||||||||||
Investments in affiliates |
2,012,809 | 2,164,402 | | (4,177,211 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Other assets |
944,087 | 922,712 | 257,103 | (1,850,019 | ) | 273,883 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term assets associated with discontinued operations |
| | 386 | | 386 | |||||||||||||||
Total long-term assets |
2,956,896 | 3,087,114 | 3,857,007 | (6,027,230 | ) | 3,873,787 | ||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 2,958,339 | $ | 3,091,064 | $ | 5,276,153 | $ | (6,032,608 | ) | $ | 5,292,948 | |||||||||
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities |
$ | 18,808 | $ | 4,541 | $ | 797,162 | $ | (5,357 | ) | $ | 815,154 | |||||||||
Current liabilities associated with discontinued operations |
| | 21,879 | | 21,879 | |||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
18,808 | 4,541 | 819,041 | (5,357 | ) | 837,033 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
1,114,398 | 143,750 | 1,002,788 | | 2,260,936 | |||||||||||||||
Intercompany payables |
| 929,964 | 881,714 | (1,811,678 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
8,274 | | 391,541 | (38,362 | ) | 361,453 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term liabilities associated with discontinued
operations |
| | 16,667 | | 16,667 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
1,141,480 | 1,078,255 | 3,111,751 | (1,855,397 | ) | 3,476,089 | ||||||||||||||
Total equity |
1,816,859 | 2,012,809 | 2,164,402 | (4,177,211 | ) | 1,816,859 | ||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 2,958,339 | $ | 3,091,064 | $ | 5,276,153 | $ | (6,032,608 | ) | $ | 5,292,948 | |||||||||
23
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
Subsidiary | Other | |||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Issuer | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidation | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | | $ | | $ | 576,308 | $ | | $ | 576,308 | ||||||||||
Costs of sales (excluding depreciation and
amortization expense) |
| | 365,715 | | 365,715 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
| | 84,051 | | 84,051 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| | 91,775 | | 91,775 | |||||||||||||||
Long-lived
asset impairment |
| | 1,707 | | 1,707 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
16,601 | 1,707 | 14,626 | | 32,934 | |||||||||||||||
Other (income) expense: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany charges, net |
(3,438 | ) | (1,177 | ) | 4,615 | | | |||||||||||||
Equity in (income) loss of affiliates |
(25,212 | ) | (25,529 | ) | | 50,741 | | |||||||||||||
Other, net |
10 | | (2,193 | ) | | (2,183 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
12,039 | 24,999 | 16,012 | (50,741 | ) | 2,309 | ||||||||||||||
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes |
(4,623 | ) | (213 | ) | 837 | | (3,999 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
16,662 | 25,212 | 15,175 | (50,741 | ) | 6,308 | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax. |
| | 10,425 | | 10,425 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
16,662 | 25,212 | 25,600 | (50,741 | ) | 16,733 | ||||||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling
interest |
| | (71 | ) | | (71 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Exterran stockholders |
$ | 16,662 | $ | 25,212 | $ | 25,529 | $ | (50,741 | ) | $ | 16,662 | |||||||||
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
Subsidiary | Other | |||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Issuer | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidation | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | | $ | | $ | 703,212 | $ | | $ | 703,212 | ||||||||||
Costs of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization
expense) |
| | 462,978 | | 462,978 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
| | 85,111 | | 85,111 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| | 82,073 | | 82,073 | |||||||||||||||
Long-lived
asset impairment |
| | 5,600 | | 5,600 | |||||||||||||||
Restructuring charges |
| | 1,704 | | 1,704 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
9,243 | 1,707 | 15,784 | | 26,734 | |||||||||||||||
Other (income) expense: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Intercompany charges, net |
(4,284 | ) | (742 | ) | 5,026 | | | |||||||||||||
Equity in (income) loss of affiliates |
56,117 | 55,504 | | (111,621 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Equity in (income) loss of non-consolidating affiliates |
| | 91,117 | | 91,117 | |||||||||||||||
Other, net |
10 | | (3,372 | ) | | (3,362 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(61,086 | ) | (56,469 | ) | (42,809 | ) | 111,621 | (48,743 | ) | |||||||||||
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes |
(1,672 | ) | (352 | ) | 12,987 | | 10,963 | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
(59,414 | ) | (56,117 | ) | (55,796 | ) | 111,621 | (59,706 | ) | |||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| | 1,806 | | 1,806 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
(59,414 | ) | (56,117 | ) | (53,990 | ) | 111,621 | (57,900 | ) | |||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to the noncontrolling
interest |
| | (1,514 | ) | | (1,514 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to Exterran stockholders. |
$ | (59,414 | ) | $ | (56,117 | ) | $ | (55,504 | ) | $ | 111,621 | $ | (59,414 | ) | ||||||
24
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
Subsidiary | Other | |||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Issuer | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidation | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
$ | (6,368 | ) | $ | (313 | ) | $ | 113,731 | $ | | $ | 107,050 | ||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
| | (47,861 | ) | | (47,861 | ) | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
| | 5,386 | | 5,386 | |||||||||||||||
Increase in restricted cash |
| | (5,545 | ) | | (5,545 | ) | |||||||||||||
Investment in consolidated subsidiaries |
19,571 | (19,258 | ) | | (313 | ) | | |||||||||||||
Net cash used in continuing operations |
19,571 | (19,258 | ) | (48,020 | ) | (313 | ) | (48,020 | ) | |||||||||||
Net cash used in discontinued operations |
| | 50,000 | | 50,000 | |||||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
19,571 | (19,258 | ) | 1,980 | (313 | ) | 1,980 | |||||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
53,000 | | | | 53,000 | |||||||||||||||
Repayments of long-term debt |
(173,943 | ) | | | | (173,943 | ) | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
342 | | | | 342 | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from stock issued pursuant to our employee stock
purchase plan |
650 | | | | 650 | |||||||||||||||
Purchases of treasury stock |
(1,670 | ) | | | | (1,670 | ) | |||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation excess tax benefit |
| | 734 | | 734 | |||||||||||||||
Distribution to noncontrolling partners in the Partnership. |
| | (3,872 | ) | | (3,872 | ) | |||||||||||||
Capital contribution (distribution), net |
(626 | ) | 19,571 | (19,258 | ) | 313 | | |||||||||||||
Borrowings (repayments) between subsidiaries, net |
108,930 | | (108,930 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(13,317 | ) | 19,571 | (131,326 | ) | 313 | (124,759 | ) | ||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
| | (613 | ) | | (613 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(114 | ) | | (16,228 | ) | | (16,342 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
163 | | 83,582 | | 83,745 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
$ | 49 | $ | | $ | 67,354 | $ | | $ | 67,403 | ||||||||||
25
Table of Contents
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
Subsidiary | Other | |||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Issuer | Subsidiaries | Eliminations | Consolidation | ||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations |
$ | (2,501 | ) | $ | (598 | ) | $ | 71,297 | $ | | $ | 68,198 | ||||||||
Net cash provided by discontinued operations |
| | 611 | | 611 | |||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
(2,501 | ) | (598 | ) | 71,908 | | 68,809 | |||||||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
| | (122,500 | ) | | (122,500 | ) | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
| | 3,194 | | 3,194 | |||||||||||||||
Increase in restricted cash |
| | (3,989 | ) | | (3,989 | ) | |||||||||||||
Investment in consolidated subsidiaries |
3,728 | (3,130 | ) | | (598 | ) | | |||||||||||||
Net cash used in continuing operations |
3,728 | (3,130 | ) | (123,295 | ) | (598 | ) | (123,295 | ) | |||||||||||
Net cash used in discontinued operations |
| | (611 | ) | | (611 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
3,728 | (3,130 | ) | (123,906 | ) | (598 | ) | (123,906 | ) | |||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
75,000 | | 1,500 | | 76,500 | |||||||||||||||
Repayments of long-term debt |
(35,000 | ) | | (22 | ) | | (35,022 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from stock issued pursuant to our employee stock
purchase plan |
961 | | | | 961 | |||||||||||||||
Purchases of treasury stock |
(393 | ) | | | | (393 | ) | |||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation excess tax benefit |
| | 7 | | 7 | |||||||||||||||
Distribution to noncontrolling partners in the Partnership. |
| | (3,857 | ) | | (3,857 | ) | |||||||||||||
Capital contribution (distribution), net |
(1,196 | ) | 3,728 | (3,130 | ) | 598 | | |||||||||||||
Borrowings (repayments) between subsidiaries, net |
(40,713 | ) | | 40,713 | | | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(1,341 | ) | 3,728 | 35,211 | 598 | 38,196 | ||||||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
| | 536 | | 536 | |||||||||||||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(114 | ) | | (16,251 | ) | | (16,365 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
163 | | 123,743 | | 123,906 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
$ | 49 | $ | | $ | 107,492 | $ | | $ | 107,541 | ||||||||||
26
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains forward-looking statements intended to qualify for the safe harbors from
liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other
than statements of historical fact contained in this report are forward-looking statements within
the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act).
You can identify many of these statements by looking for words such as believes, expects,
intends, projects, anticipates, estimates or similar words or the negative thereof.
Such forward-looking statements in this report include, without limitation, statements regarding:
| our business growth strategy and projected costs; | ||
| our future financial position; | ||
| the sufficiency of available cash flows to fund continuing operations; | ||
| the expected amount of our capital expenditures; | ||
| anticipated cost savings, future revenue, gross margin and other financial or operational measures related to our business and our primary business segments; | ||
| the future value of our equipment and non-consolidated affiliates; and | ||
| plans and objectives of our management for our future operations. |
Such forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause
actual results to differ materially from those anticipated as of the date of this report. Although
we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are based on
reasonable assumptions, no assurance can be given that these expectations will prove to be correct.
These forward-looking statements are also affected by the risk factors described in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, and those set forth from time to time in
our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which are available through our
website at www.exterran.com and through the SECs website at www.sec.gov. Important
factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations reflected in
these forward-looking statements include, among other things:
| conditions in the oil and gas industry, including a sustained decrease in the level of supply or demand for natural gas and the impact on the price of natural gas, which could cause a decline in the demand for our compression and oil and natural gas production and processing equipment and services; | ||
| our reduced profit margins or the loss of market share resulting from competition or the introduction of competing technologies by other companies; | ||
| the success of our subsidiaries, including Exterran Partners, L.P. (along with its subsidiaries, the Partnership); | ||
| changes in economic or political conditions in the countries in which we do business, including civil uprisings, riots, terrorism, kidnappings, the taking of property without fair compensation and legislative changes; | ||
| changes in currency exchange rates and restrictions on currency repatriation; | ||
| the inherent risks associated with our operations, such as equipment defects, malfunctions and natural disasters; | ||
| the risk that counterparties will not perform their obligations under our financial instruments; | ||
| the financial condition of our customers; | ||
| our ability to timely and cost-effectively obtain components necessary to conduct our business; |
27
Table of Contents
| employment workforce factors, including our ability to hire, train and retain key employees; | ||
| our ability to implement certain business and financial objectives, such as: |
| international expansion; | ||
| sales of additional United States of America (U.S.) contract operations contracts and equipment to the Partnership; | ||
| timely and cost-effective execution of projects; | ||
| integrating acquired businesses; | ||
| generating sufficient cash; and | ||
| accessing the capital markets at an acceptable cost; |
| liability related to the use of our products and services; | ||
| changes in governmental safety, health, environmental and other regulations, which could require us to make significant expenditures; and | ||
| our level of indebtedness and ability to fund our business. |
All forward-looking statements included in this report are based on information available to us on
the date of this report. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update
or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons
acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements
contained throughout this report.
GENERAL
Exterran Holdings, Inc., together with its subsidiaries (we, us, our, or Exterran), is a
global market leader in the full service natural gas compression business and a premier provider of
operations, maintenance, service and equipment for oil and natural gas production, processing and
transportation applications. Our global customer base consists of companies engaged in all aspects
of the oil and natural gas industry, including large integrated oil and natural gas companies,
national oil and natural gas companies, independent producers and natural gas processors, gatherers
and pipelines. We operate in three primary business lines: contract operations, fabrication and
aftermarket services. In our contract operations business line, we own a fleet of natural gas
compression equipment and crude oil and natural gas production and processing equipment that we
utilize to provide operations services to our customers. In our fabrication business line, we
fabricate and sell equipment similar to the equipment that we own and utilize to provide contract
operations to our customers. We also fabricate the equipment utilized in our contract operations
services. In addition, our fabrication business line provides engineering, procurement and
construction services primarily related to the manufacturing of critical process equipment for
refinery and petrochemical facilities, the construction of tank farms and the construction of
evaporators and brine heaters for desalination plants. In our Total Solutions projects, which we
offer to our customers on a contract operations or on a sale basis, we provide the engineering
design, project management, procurement and construction services necessary to incorporate our
products into complete production, processing and compression facilities. In our aftermarket
services business line, we sell parts and components and provide operations, maintenance, overhaul
and reconfiguration services to customers who own compression, production, processing, gas treating
and other equipment.
Exterran Partners, L.P.
We are the indirect majority owner of the Partnership, a master limited partnership that provides
natural gas contract operations services to customers throughout the U.S. As of March 31, 2010,
public unitholders held a 34% ownership interest in the Partnership and we owned the remaining
equity interest, including the general partner interest and all incentive distribution rights. The
general partner of the Partnership is our subsidiary and we consolidate the financial position and
results of operations of the Partnership. It is our intention for the Partnership to be the primary
vehicle for the growth of our U.S. contract operations business and for us to continue to
contribute U.S. contract operations customer contracts and equipment to the Partnership over time
in exchange for cash, the Partnerships assumption of our debt and/or additional interests in the
Partnership. As of March 31, 2010, the Partnership had a
28
Table of Contents
fleet of approximately 3,474 compressor units comprising approximately 1,318,000 horsepower, or 32%
(by available horsepower) of our and the Partnerships combined total U.S. horsepower.
OVERVIEW
Industry Conditions and Trends
Our business environment and corresponding operating results are affected by the level of energy
industry spending for the exploration, development and production of oil and natural gas reserves.
Spending by oil and natural gas exploration and production companies is dependent upon these
companies forecasts regarding the expected future supply and demand for, and future pricing of,
oil and natural gas products as well as their estimates of risk-adjusted costs to find, develop and
produce reserves. Although we believe our contract operations business is typically less impacted
by commodity prices than certain other energy service products and services, changes in oil and
natural gas exploration and production spending will normally result in changes in demand for our
products and services.
Natural Gas Consumption. Natural gas consumption in the U.S. for the twelve months ended January
31, 2010 decreased by approximately 1% over the twelve months ended January 31, 2009. Total U.S.
natural gas consumption is projected by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) to
increase by 1.9% in 2010 and decline by 0.6% in 2011, and is expected to increase by an average of
0.7% per year thereafter until 2030. Natural gas consumption worldwide is projected to increase by
2.4% per year until 2030, according to the EIA.
In 2008, the U.S. accounted for an estimated annual production of approximately 21 trillion cubic
feet of natural gas, or 19% of the worldwide total of approximately 110 trillion cubic feet. The
EIA estimates that the U.S.s natural gas production level will be approximately 23 trillion cubic
feet in 2030, or 15% of the worldwide total of approximately 153 trillion cubic feet.
Our Performance Trends and Outlook
Our revenue, earnings and financial position are affected by, among other things, market conditions
that impact demand and pricing for natural gas compression and oil and natural gas production and
processing and our customers decisions regarding whether to utilize our products and services
rather than utilize products and services from our competitors. In particular, many of our North
America contract operations agreements with customers have short initial terms; we cannot be
certain that these contracts will be renewed after the end of the initial contractual term, and any
such nonrenewal, or renewal at a reduced rate, could adversely impact our results of operations.
However, we believe that, barring a significant and extended worldwide recession, industry activity
outside of North America should be less affected given the longer-term nature of oil and natural
gas infrastructure development projects in international markets.
In the quarter ended March 31, 2010, we saw an increase in natural gas drilling and an increase in
order activity and bookings in our contract operations and fabrication business segments in the
North America market. Despite this increase in activity, our total operating horsepower in North
America decreased slightly in the quarter ended March 31, 2010 compared to a decrease of
approximately 4% in the quarter ended December 31, 2009. We believe that uncertainty around natural
gas supply and demand and natural gas prices, along with the current available supply of idle and
underutilized compression equipment owned by our customers and competitors may negatively impact
our ability to improve our North America contract operations horsepower utilization and pricing
and, therefore, revenues in the near term. In international markets,
we expect the start-up of projects in our contract operations backlog will result in an increase in revenues in our international
contract operations business in 2010 compared to 2009. Additionally, we believe there will continue
to be demand for our contract operations and Total Solutions projects in international markets, and
we expect to have opportunities to grow our international business through our contract operations,
aftermarket services and fabrication business segments.
As industry capital spending declined in 2009, our fabrication business segment experienced a
reduction in demand. This decline in demand for our fabrication products led to a reduction in our
fabrication backlog and revenue for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
Our level of capital spending depends on the demand for our products and services and the equipment
we require to render services to our customers. Although we are not able at this time to predict
the final impact of the current market and industry conditions on our business, our level of
capital investment in our contract operations fleet assets has declined and, based on current
market conditions, we expect that net cash provided by operating activities will be in excess of
our requirements to finance our capital expenditures and scheduled debt repayments through December
31, 2010.
29
Table of Contents
The Partnerships senior secured credit
facility matures in October 2011. If the Partnership were to replace this facility based on current
market conditions, we expect that the interest rate
under the replacement facility would be higher than that in the Partnerships current facility and
therefore would lead to higher interest expense in future periods.
We intend for the Partnership to be the primary vehicle for the long-term growth of our U.S.
contract operations business. In November 2009, the Partnership acquired from us additional
contract operations customer service agreements with 18 customers and a fleet of approximately 900
compressor units used to provide compression services under those agreements (the November 2009
Contract Operations Acquisition). We intend to continue to contribute over time additional U.S.
contract operations customer contracts and equipment to the Partnership in exchange for cash, the
Partnerships assumption of our debt and/or our receipt of additional interests in the Partnership.
Such transactions would depend on, among other things, market and economic conditions, our ability
to reach agreement with the Partnership regarding the terms of any purchase and the availability to
the Partnership of debt and equity capital on reasonable terms.
Financial Highlights
Financial highlights for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to the prior year
period, which are discussed in greater detail below in Financial Results of Operations, were as
follows:
| Revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $576.3 million compared to $703.2 million for the prior year period. The decrease in revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2010 is primarily due to the reduced sales in our North America contract operations and fabrication segments. |
| Net income attributable to Exterran for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $16.7 million, compared to net loss attributable to Exterran of $59.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The net loss attributable to Exterran for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was primarily due to a $90.1 million ($81.7 million net of tax) charge related to our investments in non-consolidated affiliates located in Venezuela. |
The following table summarizes our charges for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared
to the prior year period (dollars in thousands):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Long-lived asset impairment |
$ | 1,707 | $ | 5,600 | ||||
Restructuring charges |
| 1,704 | ||||||
Investment in non-consolidated affiliates impairment |
| 96,556 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 1,707 | $ | 103,860 | ||||
Operating Highlights
As discussed in Note 2 to the Financial Statements of this report, the results from continuing
operations for all periods presented exclude the results of our Venezuela international contract
operations and aftermarket services businesses. Those results are now reflected in discontinued
operations for all periods presented.
30
Table of Contents
The following tables summarize our total available horsepower, total operating horsepower,
horsepower utilization percentages and fabrication backlog.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, | December 31, | March 31, | ||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2009 | ||||||||||
(Horsepower in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Total Available Horsepower (at period end): |
||||||||||||
North America |
4,293 | 4,321 | 4,576 | |||||||||
International |
1,232 | 1,234 | 1,180 | |||||||||
Total |
5,525 | 5,555 | 5,756 | |||||||||
Total Operating Horsepower (at period end): |
||||||||||||
North America |
2,838 | 2,867 | 3,308 | |||||||||
International |
1,022 | 1,032 | 1,018 | |||||||||
Total |
3,860 | 3,899 | 4,326 | |||||||||
Total Operating Horsepower (average): |
||||||||||||
North America |
2,855 | 2,920 | 3,389 | |||||||||
International |
1,026 | 1,022 | 1,041 | |||||||||
Total |
3,881 | 3,942 | 4,430 | |||||||||
Horsepower Utilization (at period end): |
||||||||||||
North America |
66 | % | 66 | % | 72 | % | ||||||
International |
83 | % | 84 | % | 86 | % | ||||||
Total |
70 | % | 70 | % | 75 | % |
March 31, | December 31, | March 31, | ||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2009 | ||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||
Compressor and Accessory Fabrication Backlog |
$ | 277.0 | $ | 296.9 | $ | 354.8 | ||||||
Production and Processing Equipment Fabrication Backlog |
488.2 | 515.6 | 695.8 | |||||||||
Fabrication Backlog |
$ | 765.2 | $ | 812.5 | $ | 1,050.6 | ||||||
FINANCIAL RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
As discussed in Note 2 to the Financial Statements of this report, the results from continuing
operations for all periods presented exclude the results of our Venezuela international contract
operations and aftermarket services businesses. Those results are now reflected in discontinued
operations for all periods presented.
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010 COMPARED TO THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009
Summary of Business Segment Results
North America Contract Operations
(dollars in thousands)
(dollars in thousands)
Three months ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, | Increase | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 152,627 | $ | 194,393 | (21 | )% | ||||||
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization expense) |
71,375 | 83,705 | (15 | )% | ||||||||
Gross margin |
$ | 81,252 | $ | 110,688 | (27 | )% | ||||||
Gross margin percentage |
53 | % | 57 | % | (4 | )% |
The decrease in revenue, cost of sales and gross margin (defined as revenue less cost of sales,
excluding depreciation and amortization expense) was primarily due to a 16% decrease in average
operating horsepower and a 7% reduction in our revenue per average operating horsepower in the
three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009. Gross margin,
a non-GAAP financial measure, is reconciled, in total, to net income (loss), its most directly
comparable financial measure in Note 14 to the Financial Statements. Our average operating
horsepower declined due to a deterioration of market conditions in North America. This
deterioration and an increased competitive environment resulted in pricing pressure during much of
2009 and in the three months ended March 31, 2010.
31
Table of Contents
International Contract Operations
(dollars in thousands)
(dollars in thousands)
Three months ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, | Increase | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 109,740 | $ | 90,679 | 21 | % | ||||||
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization expense) |
40,855 | 32,805 | 25 | % | ||||||||
Gross margin |
$ | 68,885 | $ | 57,874 | 19 | % | ||||||
Gross margin percentage |
63 | % | 64 | % | (1 | )% |
The increase in revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2009 was primarily the result of an increase of revenue in Indonesia and Brazil of
approximately $10.2 million and $8.6 million, respectively, due to the start up of new contracts in
these regions.
Aftermarket Services
(dollars in thousands)
(dollars in thousands)
Three months ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, | Increase | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 70,323 | $ | 75,531 | (7 | )% | ||||||
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization expense) |
56,612 | 59,754 | (5 | )% | ||||||||
Gross margin |
$ | 13,711 | $ | 15,777 | (13 | )% | ||||||
Gross margin percentage |
19 | % | 21 | % | (2 | )% |
The decrease in revenue, cost of sales and gross margin was primarily due to reduced sales in North
America of approximately $17.5 million, partially offset by an increase in international sales. The
decrease in the gross margin percentage in the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the
same period in the prior year was primarily due to under-absorption of overhead costs resulting
from the reduction in revenue in North America.
Fabrication
(dollars in thousands)
(dollars in thousands)
Three months ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, | Increase | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 243,618 | $ | 342,609 | (29 | )% | ||||||
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization expense) |
196,873 | 286,714 | (31 | )% | ||||||||
Gross margin |
$ | 46,745 | $ | 55,895 | (16 | )% | ||||||
Gross margin percentage |
19 | % | 16 | % | 3 | % |
The decrease in revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2009 was primarily due to a $67.2 million reduction in revenue in our production and
processing equipment fabrication product line and a $33.8 million reduction in revenue in our
compressor and accessory fabrication product line. The decrease in fabrication revenue was due to
the completion of various projects and a reduction in new bookings caused by weaker market
conditions in 2009. The increase in the overall fabrication gross margin percentage in the three
months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same period in the prior year is primarily due to
improved performance on jobs in our Eastern Hemisphere production and processing equipment
fabrication product line in the three months ended March 31, 2010.
32
Table of Contents
Costs and Expenses
(dollars in thousands)
(dollars in thousands)
Three months ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, | Increase | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
$ | 84,051 | $ | 85,111 | (1 | )% | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
91,775 | 82,073 | 12 | % | ||||||||
Long-lived asset impairment |
1,707 | 5,600 | (70 | )% | ||||||||
Restructuring charges |
| 1,704 | (100 | )% | ||||||||
Interest expense |
32,934 | 26,734 | 23 | % | ||||||||
Equity in loss of non-consolidated affiliates |
| 91,117 | (100 | )% | ||||||||
Other (income) expense, net |
(2,183 | ) | (3,362 | ) | (35 | )% |
The decrease in selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses was primarily due to reduced
business activity levels during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and expense reduction
measures we enacted in June 2009. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A expense for the three month
periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was 15% and 12%, respectively. The decrease in SG&A was
partially offset by an increase in state and local taxes of $2.5 million primarily due to increased
revenues in Brazil during the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase in SG&A as a
percentage of revenue during the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the three months
ended March 31, 2009 was primarily due to the increase in state and local taxes in Brazil and the
impact of revenue decreasing more rapidly than SG&A in the three months ended March 31, 2010
compared to the same period in the prior year.
The increase in depreciation and amortization expense during the three months ended March 31, 2010
compared to the same period in the prior year was primarily the result of property, plant and
equipment additions and increased amortization and depreciation on large international projects.
Long-lived asset impairments in the three
months ended March 31, 2010 were $1.7 million and resulted from a decline in market conditions.
These impairments were recorded on compression units that had been previously removed from our available
fleet and were to be disposed of. Long-lived asset impairments in the three months ended March 31, 2009
were $5.6 million and related to a plan approved by management to close certain fabrication facilities and
consolidate our compression fabrication activities. See Note 9 to the Financial Statements for further
discussion of the long-lived asset impairments.
Restructuring charges of $1.7 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 were primarily
related to severance, retention and employee benefit costs and other facility
closure and moving costs resulting from our decision to close and consolidate certain of our
fabrication facilities. See Note 10 to the Financial Statements for further discussion of the
restructuring charges.
The increase in interest expense during the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2009, was primarily due to an increase in our weighted average effective
interest rate, including the impact of interest rate swaps, to 5.6% for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 from 4.0% for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The increase in our weighted
average effective interest rate is primarily due to the 11.67% effective interest rate on our 4.25%
Notes, which was higher than the rate of the debt it replaced. This increase was partially offset
by a lower average debt balance during the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to the three
months ended March 31, 2009.
Equity in loss of non-consolidated affiliates for the three months ended March 31, 2009 related to
the impairment recorded in the first quarter of 2009 caused by a loss in fair value of our
investments in non-consolidated affiliates in Venezuela that was not temporary. Because we have
written off the majority of our investments in non-consolidated affiliates, we currently do not
expect to have significant, if any, equity earnings in non-consolidated affiliates in the future
from these investments. There are many uncertainties concerning our investment in our
non-consolidated affiliates which may cause us to record a gain or loss on our investment in future
periods. See Note 5 to the Financial Statements for further discussion of the impairment of our
investments in non-consolidated affiliates in the first quarter of 2009.
Other
(income) expense, net, includes a foreign currency translation
loss of $1.6 million in the
three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to a gain of $2.2 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2009. The foreign currency translation gains and losses are primarily related to the
remeasurement of our international subsidiaries net assets exposed to changes in foreign currency
rates.
The foreign currency translation loss for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 was primarily caused by the U.S. dollar strengthening
compared to the Brazilian Real during the three months ended March
31, 2010.
The foreign currency translation gains for the three months ended March 31, 2009 were
primarily caused by the U.S. dollar strengthening compared to the Euro during the three months
ended March 31, 2009. In addition, in the three months ended
March 31, 2010 we recorded a $2.7 million charge primarily related to
importation penalties in Latin America and a $4.9 million gain on the sale of a loan and our
interest in an entity related to a project in Nigeria that had
previously been written off.
33
Table of Contents
Income Taxes
(dollars in thousands)
(dollars in thousands)
Three months ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, | Increase | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes |
$ | (3,999 | ) | $ | 10,963 | (136 | )% | |||||
Effective tax rate |
(173.2 | )% | (22.5 | )% | (150.7 | )% |
The decrease in our provision for income taxes was primarily due to lower income before income
taxes, excluding $96.6 million of impairment charges reflected in equity in loss of
non-consolidated affiliates and an $8.4 million deferred tax benefit related to the impairment of
our investments in non-consolidated affiliates recorded in the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Our provision and effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was impacted by a
$3.9 million net tax benefit recorded on the sale of loans and interest in an entity related to a
project in Nigeria.
Discontinued Operations
(dollars in thousands)
(dollars in thousands)
Three months ended | ||||||||||||
March 31, | Increase | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | (Decrease) | ||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
$ | 10,425 | $ | 1,806 | 477 | % |
The income from discontinued operations, net of tax for the three months ended March 31, 2009
related to our operations in Venezuela that were expropriated in June 2009. In January 2010, the
Venezuelan government announced a devaluation of the Venezuelan bolivar. This devaluation resulted
in a translation gain of approximately $12.2 million on the remeasurement of our net liability
position in Venezuela. The functional currency of our Venezuela subsidiary is the U.S. dollar and
we had more liabilities than assets denominated in bolivars in Venezuela at the time of the
devaluation. The exchange rate used to remeasure our net liabilities changed from 2.15 bolivars per
U.S. dollar at December 31, 2009 to 4.3 bolivars per U.S. dollar in January 2010.
Noncontrolling Interest
As of March 31, 2010, noncontrolling interest is primarily comprised of the portion of the
Partnerships earnings that is applicable to the limited partner interest in the Partnership that
we do not own.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our unrestricted cash balance was $67.4 million at March 31, 2010, compared to $83.7 million at
December 31, 2009. Working capital from continuing operations decreased to $528.2 million at March
31, 2010 from $545.9 million at December 31, 2009.
Our cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities, as reflected in the consolidated
statements of cash flows, are summarized in the table below (in thousands):
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operations: |
||||||||
Operating activities |
$ | 107,050 | $ | 68,198 | ||||
Investing activities |
(48,020 | ) | (123,295 | ) | ||||
Financing activities |
(124,759 | ) | 38,196 | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
(613 | ) | 536 | |||||
Discontinued operations |
50,000 | | ||||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | (16,342 | ) | $ | (16,365 | ) | ||
Operating Activities. The increase in cash provided by operating activities for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009 was primarily due to a
decrease in cash used for working capital during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
34
Table of Contents
This
increase in cash was partially offset by a reduction in gross margin from our North America
contract operations and fabrication segments as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Investing Activities. The decrease in cash used in investing activities during the three months
ended March 31, 2010 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009 was attributable to a
decrease in capital expenditures primarily related to our contract operations business during the
three months ended March 31, 2010.
Financing Activities. The increase in cash used in financing activities during the three months
ended March 31, 2010 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009 was primarily attributable
to an increase in net repayments of long-term debt during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Capital Expenditures. We generally invest funds necessary to fabricate fleet additions when our
idle equipment cannot be reconfigured to economically fulfill a projects requirements and the new
equipment expenditure is expected to generate economic returns over its expected useful life that
exceed our targeted return on capital. We currently plan to spend approximately $250 million to
$300 million in net capital expenditures during 2010, including (1) contract operations equipment
additions and (2) approximately $90 million to $100 million on equipment maintenance capital
related to our contract operations business. Net capital expenditures are net of fleet sales.
Long-Term Debt. As of March 31, 2010, we had approximately $2.1 billion in outstanding debt
obligations, consisting of $530.0 million outstanding under our 2007 ABS Facility (as defined
below), $770.0 million outstanding under our term loan, $143.8 million outstanding under our 4.75%
convertible notes due 2014, $269.4 million outstanding under our 4.25% Notes, $283.0 million
outstanding under the Partnerships revolving credit facility, $117.5 million outstanding under the
Partnerships term loan and $30.0 million outstanding under the Partnerships asset-backed securitization facility.
On August 20, 2007, we entered into a senior secured credit agreement (the Credit Agreement) with
various financial institutions. The Credit Agreement consists of (a) a five-year revolving credit
facility in the aggregate amount of $850 million, which includes a variable allocation for a
Canadian tranche and the ability to issue letters of credit under the facility and (b) a six-year
term loan senior secured credit facility, in the aggregate amount of $800 million with principal
payments due on multiple dates through June 2013 (collectively, the Credit Facility). Subject to
certain conditions as of March 31, 2010, at our request and with the approval of the lenders, the
aggregate commitments under the Credit Facility may be increased by an additional $400 million less
certain adjustments. As of March 31, 2010, we had $283.9 million in letters of credit outstanding
under our revolving credit facility and $770.0 million in outstanding borrowings under our term
loan.
Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest, if they are in U.S. dollars, at a base rate or
LIBOR at our option plus an applicable margin, as defined in the agreement. The applicable margin
varies depending on our debt ratings. At March 31, 2010, all amounts outstanding were LIBOR loans
and the applicable margin was 0.825%. The weighted average interest rate at March 31, 2010 on the
outstanding balance, excluding the effect of interest rate swaps, was 1.1%.
The Credit Agreement contains various covenants with which we must comply, including, but not
limited to, limitations on incurrence of indebtedness, investments, liens on assets, transactions
with affiliates, mergers, consolidations, sales of assets and other provisions customary in similar
types of agreements. We must also maintain, on a consolidated basis, required leverage and interest
coverage ratios. Additionally, the Credit Agreement contains customary conditions, representations
and warranties, events of default and indemnification provisions. Our indebtedness under the Credit
Facility is collateralized by liens on substantially all of our personal property in the U.S. The
assets of the Partnership and our wholly-owned subsidiary, Exterran ABS 2007 LLC (along with its
subsidiary, Exterran ABS), are not collateral under the Credit Agreement. Exterran Canada,
Limited Partnerships indebtedness under the Credit Facility is collateralized by liens on
substantially all of its personal property in Canada. We have executed a U.S. Pledge Agreement
pursuant to which we and our Significant Subsidiaries (as defined in the Credit Agreement) are
required to pledge our equity and the equity of certain subsidiaries. The Partnership and Exterran
ABS are not pledged under this agreement and do not guarantee debt under the Credit Facility.
In August 2007, Exterran ABS entered into a $1.0 billion asset-backed securitization facility (the
2007 ABS Facility), which was reduced to an $800 million facility in October 2009 concurrently
with the closing of the Partnerships new $150 million asset-backed securitization facility. The
amount outstanding at any time is limited to the lower of (i) 80% of the value of the natural gas
compression equipment owned by Exterran ABS and its subsidiaries, (ii) 4.5 times free cash flow or
(iii) the amount calculated under an interest coverage test (as these limits are defined in the
agreement). Based on these tests, the limit on the amount outstanding can be
35
Table of Contents
increased or decreased in future periods. As of March 31, 2010, we had $530.0 million in
outstanding borrowings under the 2007 ABS Facility.
As of March 31, 2010, our senior secured borrowings consisted of our 2007 ABS Facility, the term
loan and our revolving credit facility. At March 31, 2010, we had undrawn capacity of $566.0
million and $270.0 million under our revolving credit facility and 2007 ABS Facility, respectively.
Our Credit Agreement limits our total outstanding Senior Secured Debt to EBITDA ratio (as defined
in the Credit Agreement) to be not greater than 4.0 to 1.0. Due to this limitation, only $668.5
million of the combined $836.0 million of undrawn capacity under both facilities was available for
additional borrowings as of March 31, 2010. Further, as of March 31, 2010, only $108.5 million of
the $270.0 million in unfunded commitments under our 2007 ABS Facility was available due to certain
covenant limitations under the facility, assuming such facility was fully funded with all eligible
contract compression assets available at that time. If our operations within Exterran ABS experience additional reductions in cash flows, the amount
available for additional borrowings could be further reduced. If the outstanding borrowings exceed
the amount allowed based on the limitations, we can utilize either certain cash flows from Exterran
ABSs operations or borrowings under our revolving credit facility, or a combination of both, to
reduce the amount of borrowings outstanding to the amount allowed pursuant to the limitations.
Interest and fees payable to the noteholders accrue on the 2007 ABS Facility at a variable rate
consisting of one month LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 0.825%. The weighted average interest
rate at March 31, 2010 on borrowings under the 2007 ABS Facility, excluding the effect of interest
rate swaps, was 1.1%. The 2007 ABS Facility is revolving in nature and is payable in July 2012.
Repayment of the 2007 ABS Facility notes has been secured by a pledge of all of the assets of
Exterran ABS, consisting primarily of specified compression services contracts and a fleet of
natural gas compressors. Under the 2007 ABS Facility, we had $17.3 million of restricted cash as of
March 31, 2010.
In June 2009, we issued under our shelf registration statement $355.0 million aggregate principal
amount of 4.25% Notes, including $30.0 million issued under the underwriters overallotment option.
The 4.25% Notes are convertible upon the occurrence of certain conditions into shares of our common
stock at an initial conversion rate of 43.1951 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal
amount of the convertible notes, equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $23.15
per share of common stock. The conversion rate will be subject to adjustment following certain
dilutive events and certain corporate transactions. We may not redeem the notes prior to the
maturity date of the notes.
The 4.25% Notes are our senior unsecured obligations and rank senior in right of payment to our
existing and future indebtedness that is expressly subordinated in right of payment to the 4.25%
Notes; equal in right of payment to our existing and future unsecured indebtedness that is not so
subordinated; junior in right of payment to any of our secured indebtedness to the extent of the
value of the assets securing such indebtedness; and structurally junior to all existing and future
indebtedness and liabilities incurred by our subsidiaries. The 4.25% Notes are not guaranteed by
any of our subsidiaries.
In connection with the offering of the 4.25% Notes, we purchased call options on our stock at
approximately $23.15 per share of common stock and sold warrants on our stock at approximately
$32.67 per share of common stock. These transactions economically adjust the effective conversion
price to $32.67 for $325.0 million of the 4.25% Notes and therefore are expected to reduce the
potential dilution to our common stock upon any such conversion. We used $36.3 million of the net
proceeds from this debt offering and the full $53.1 million of the proceeds from the warrants sold
to pay the cost of the purchased call options, and the remaining net proceeds from this debt
offering to repay approximately $173.8 million of indebtedness under our revolving credit facility
and approximately $135.0 million of indebtedness outstanding under the 2007 ABS Facility.
The Partnership, as guarantor, and EXLP Operating LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Partnership
(together with the Partnership, the Partnership Borrowers), are parties to a senior secured
credit agreement (the Partnership Credit Agreement) that provides for a five-year, $315 million
revolving credit facility that matures in October 2011. As of March 31, 2010, there was $283.0
million in outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility.
The Partnerships revolving credit facility bears interest at a base rate or LIBOR, at the
Partnerships option, plus an applicable margin, as defined in the agreement. At March 31, 2010 all
amounts outstanding were LIBOR loans and the applicable margin was 1.5%. The weighted average
interest rate on the outstanding balance of the Partnerships revolving credit facility, at March
31, 2010, excluding the effect of interest rate swaps, was 1.8%.
36
Table of Contents
In May 2008, the Partnership Borrowers entered into an amendment to the Partnership Credit
Agreement that increased the aggregate commitments under that facility to provide for a $117.5
million term loan facility. The $117.5 million term loan was funded during July 2008 and $58.3
million was drawn on the Partnerships revolving credit facility, which together were used to repay
the debt assumed by the Partnership concurrently with the closing of the acquisition by the
Partnership from us of certain contract compression assets and to pay other costs incurred. The
$117.5 million term loan is non-amortizing but must be repaid with the net cash proceeds from any
equity offerings of the Partnership until paid in full.
The term loan bears interest at a base rate or LIBOR, at the Partnerships option, plus an
applicable margin. Borrowings under the term loan are subject to the same credit agreement and
covenants as the Partnerships revolving credit facility, except for an additional covenant
requiring mandatory prepayment of the term loan from net cash proceeds of any future equity
offerings of the Partnership, on a dollar-for-dollar basis. At March 31, 2010, all amounts
outstanding were LIBOR loans and the applicable margin was 2.0%. The weighted average interest rate
on the outstanding balance of the Partnerships term loan at March 31, 2010, excluding the effect
of interest rate swaps, was 2.3%.
Borrowings under the Partnership Credit Agreement are secured by substantially all of the personal
property assets of the Partnership Borrowers, other than the assets of EXLP ABS 2009 LLC and its
subsidiaries, which secure the Partnerships asset-backed securitization facility discussed below.
In addition, all of the membership interests of the Partnerships restricted subsidiaries have been
pledged to secure the obligations under the Partnership Credit Agreement. Subject to certain
conditions, at the Partnerships request, and with the approval of the lenders, the aggregate
commitments under the Partnerships senior secured credit facility may be increased by an
additional $17.5 million. This amount will be increased on a dollar-for-dollar basis with each
payment under the term loan facility.
In October 2009, the Partnership entered into a new $150 million asset-backed securitization
facility (the 2009 ABS Facility). The 2009 ABS Facility notes are revolving in nature and are
payable in July 2013. Interest and fees payable to the noteholders accrue on these notes at a
variable rate consisting of an applicable margin of 3.5% plus, at the Partnerships option, either
LIBOR or a base rate. The weighted average interest rate on the outstanding balance of the 2009 ABS
Facility at March 31, 2010, excluding the effect of interest rate swaps, was 3.8%. Repayment of the
2009 ABS Facility notes has been secured by a pledge of all of the assets of EXLP ABS 2009 LLC and
its subsidiaries, consisting primarily of specified compression services contracts and a fleet of
natural gas compressor units. The amount outstanding at any time is limited to the lower of (i) 75%
of the value of the natural gas compression equipment owned by EXLP ABS 2009 LLC and its
subsidiaries (as defined in the agreement), (ii) 4.0 times free cash flow or (iii) the amount
calculated under an interest coverage test. Additionally, the Partnership Credit Agreement limits
the amount we can borrow under the 2009 ABS Facility to two times the Partnerships EBITDA (as
defined in the Partnership Credit Agreement). As of March 31, 2010, there was $30.0 million in
outstanding borrowings under the 2009 ABS Facility.
As of March 31, 2010, the Partnership had undrawn capacity of $32.0 million and $120.0 million
under its revolving credit facility and 2009 ABS Facility,
respectively. Due to limitations under
the Partnership Credit Agreement on the Partnerships total outstanding senior secured borrowings,
only approximately $106.7 million of the combined $152.0 million of undrawn capacity under both
facilities would have been available for additional borrowings as of March 31, 2010.
Our bank credit facilities, asset-backed securitization facilities and the agreements governing
certain of our other indebtedness include various covenants with which we must comply, including,
but not limited to, limitations on incurrence of indebtedness, investments, liens on assets,
transactions with affiliates, mergers, consolidations, sales of assets and other provisions
customary in similar types of agreements. For example, under our Credit Agreement we must maintain
various consolidated financial ratios including a ratio of EBITDA (as defined in the Credit
Agreement) to Total Interest Expense (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of not less than 2.25 to
1.0, a ratio of consolidated Total Debt (as defined in the Credit Agreement) to EBITDA of not
greater than 5.0 to 1.0 and a ratio of Senior Secured Debt (as defined in the Credit Agreement) to
EBITDA of not greater than 4.0 to 1.0. As of March 31, 2010, we maintained a 5.7 to 1.0 EBITDA to
Total Interest Expense ratio, a 3.5 to 1.0 consolidated Total Debt to EBITDA ratio and a 2.7 to 1.0
Senior Secured Debt to EBITDA ratio. If we fail to remain in compliance with our financial
covenants we would be in default under our credit agreements. In addition, if we experienced a
material adverse effect on our assets, liabilities, financial condition, business, operations or
prospects that, taken as a whole, impact our ability to perform our obligations under our credit
agreements, this could lead to a default under our credit agreements. A default under one or more
of our debt agreements, including a default by the Partnership under its credit facilities, would
trigger cross-default provisions under certain of our debt agreements, which would accelerate our
obligation to repay our indebtedness under those agreements. As of March 31, 2010, we were in
compliance with all financial covenants under our credit agreements.
37
Table of Contents
The Partnership Credit Agreement contains various covenants with which the Partnership must comply,
including restrictions on the use of proceeds from borrowings and limitations on its ability to:
incur additional debt or sell assets, make certain investments and acquisitions, grant liens and
pay dividends and distributions. The Partnership must maintain various consolidated financial
ratios, including a ratio of EBITDA (as defined in the Partnership Credit Agreement) to Total
Interest Expense (as defined in the Partnership Credit Agreement) of not less than 2.5 to 1.0, and
a ratio of Total Debt (as defined in the Partnership Credit Agreement) to EBITDA of not greater
than 5.0 to 1.0. The Partnership Credit Agreement allows for the Partnerships Total Debt to EBITDA
ratio to be increased from 5.0 to 1.0 to 5.5 to 1.0 during a quarter when an acquisition meeting
certain thresholds is completed and for the following two quarters after the acquisition closes.
Therefore, because the November 2009 Contract Operations Acquisition closed in the fourth quarter
of 2009 and met the applicable thresholds, the maximum allowed ratio of Total Debt to EBITDA was
increased from 5.0 to 1.0 to 5.5 to 1.0 for the quarters ending December 31, 2009, March 31, 2010
and June 30, 2010. After June 30, 2010, the Partnerships required Total Debt to EBITDA ratio will
revert back to 5.0 to 1.0. As of March 31, 2010, the Partnership maintained a 4.7 to 1.0 EBITDA to
Total Interest Expense ratio and a 4.4 to 1.0 Total Debt to EBITDA ratio. If the Partnership
experiences a deterioration in the demand for its services and is unable to consummate further
acquisitions from us, amend its senior secured credit facility or restructure its debt, it
estimates that it could be in violation of the maximum Total Debt to EBITDA covenant ratio
contained in its senior secured credit facility in 2010. A violation of the Partnerships Total
Debt to EBITDA covenant would be an event of default under the Partnership Credit Agreement which
would trigger cross-default provisions under certain of our debt agreements. As of March 31, 2010,
the Partnership was in compliance with all financial covenants under the Partnership Credit
Agreement.
We have entered into interest rate swap agreements related to a portion of our variable rate debt.
See Part I, Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk for further
discussion of our interest rate swap agreements.
The interest rate we pay under our Credit Agreement can be affected by changes in our credit
rating. As of March 31, 2010, our credit ratings as assigned by Moodys and Standard & Poors were:
Standard | ||||||||
Moodys | & Poors | |||||||
Outlook |
Stable | Stable | ||||||
Corporate Family Rating |
Ba2 | BB | ||||||
Exterran Senior Secured Credit Facility |
Ba2 | BB+ | ||||||
4.75% convertible senior notes due January 2014 |
| BB | ||||||
4.25% convertible senior notes due June 2014 |
| BB |
Historically, we have financed capital expenditures with a combination of net cash provided by
operating and financing activities. Our ability to access the capital markets may be restricted at
a time when we would like, or need, to do so, which could have an adverse impact on our ability to
maintain our fleet and to grow. If any of our lenders become unable to perform their obligations
under our credit facilities, our borrowing capacity under these facilities could be reduced.
Inability to borrow additional amounts under those facilities could limit our ability to fund our
future growth and operations. Additionally, PDVSA has assumed control over substantially all of our
assets and operations in Venezuela, as discussed further in Note 2 to the Financial Statements,
which has impacted our cash provided by operations. Based on current market conditions, we expect
that net cash provided by operating activities will be sufficient to finance our operating
expenditures, capital expenditures and scheduled interest and debt repayments through December 31,
2010; however, to the extent it is not, we may borrow additional funds under our credit facilities
or we may seek additional debt or equity financing.
Stock Repurchase Program. On August 20, 2007, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of
up to $200 million of our common stock through August 19, 2009. In December 2008, our board of
directors increased the share repurchase program, from $200 million to $300 million, and extended
the expiration date of the authorization, from August 19, 2009 to December 15, 2010. Since the
program was initiated, we have repurchased 5,416,221 shares of our common stock at an aggregate
cost of approximately $199.9 million. We did not repurchase any shares under this program during
the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Dividends. We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock since our formation, and we do
not anticipate paying such dividends in the foreseeable future. Our board of directors anticipates
that all cash flows generated from operations in the foreseeable future will be retained and used
to repay our debt, repurchase our stock or develop and expand our business, except for a portion of
the cash flow generated from operations of the Partnership which will be used to pay a distribution
on its units not owned by us. Any future determinations to pay cash dividends on our common stock
will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our results of operations
and financial condition, credit and loan agreements in effect at that time and other factors deemed
relevant by our board of directors.
38
Table of Contents
Partnership Distributions to Unitholders. The Partnerships partnership agreement requires it to
distribute all of its available cash quarterly. Under the partnership agreement, available cash
is defined generally to mean, for each fiscal quarter, (1) cash on hand at the Partnership at the
end of the quarter in excess of the amount of reserves its general partner determines is necessary
or appropriate to provide for the conduct of its business, to comply with applicable law, any of
its debt instruments or other agreements or to provide for future distributions to its unitholders
for any one or more of the upcoming four quarters, plus, (2) if the Partnerships general partner
so determines, all or a portion of the Partnerships cash on hand on the date of determination of
available cash for the quarter.
Under the terms of the partnership agreement, there is no guarantee that unitholders will receive
quarterly distributions from the Partnership. The Partnerships distribution policy, which may be
changed at any time, is subject to certain restrictions, including (1) restrictions contained in
the Partnerships revolving credit facility, (2) the Partnerships general partners establishment
of reserves to fund future operations or cash distributions to the Partnerships unitholders, (3)
restrictions contained in the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act and (4) the
Partnerships lack of sufficient cash to pay distributions.
Through our ownership of common and subordinated units and all of the equity interests in the
general partner of the Partnership, we expect to receive cash distributions from the Partnership.
Our rights to receive distributions of cash from the Partnership as holder of subordinated units
are subordinated to the rights of the common unitholders to receive such distributions.
On April 30, 2010, the board of directors of Exterran GP LLC approved a cash distribution of
$0.4625 per limited partner unit, or approximately $11.6 million, including distributions to the
Partnerships general partner on its incentive distribution rights. The distribution covers the
period from January 1, 2010 through March 31, 2010. The record date for this distribution is May
11, 2010, and payment is expected to occur on May 14, 2010.
NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURE
We define gross margin as total revenue less cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization
expense). Gross margin is included as a supplemental disclosure because it is a primary measure
used by our management as it represents the results of revenue and cost of sales (excluding
depreciation and amortization expense), which are key components of our operations. We believe
gross margin is important because it focuses on the current operating performance of our operations
and excludes the impact of the prior historical costs of the assets acquired or constructed that
are utilized in those operations, the indirect costs associated with selling, general and
administrative (SG&A) activities, the impact of our financing methods and income taxes.
Depreciation expense may not accurately reflect the costs required to maintain and replenish the
operational usage of our assets and therefore may not portray the costs from current operating
activity. As an indicator of our operating performance, gross margin should not be considered an
alternative to, or more meaningful than, net income (loss) as determined in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (GAAP). Our gross margin may not be
comparable to a similarly titled measure of another company because other entities may not
calculate gross margin in the same manner.
Gross margin has certain material limitations associated with its use as compared to net income
(loss). These limitations are primarily due to the exclusion of interest expense, depreciation and
amortization expense, SG&A expense, impairments and restructuring charges. Each of these excluded
expenses is material to our consolidated results of operations. Because we intend to finance a
portion of our operations through borrowings, interest expense is a necessary element of our costs
and our ability to generate revenue. Additionally, because we use capital assets, depreciation
expense is a necessary element of our costs and our ability to generate revenue, and SG&A expenses
are necessary costs to support our operations and required corporate activities. To compensate for
these limitations, management uses this non-GAAP measure as a supplemental measure to other GAAP
results to provide a more complete understanding of our performance.
For a reconciliation of gross margin to net income (loss), see Note 14 to the Financial Statements.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
We have no material off-balance sheet arrangements.
39
Table of Contents
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
We are exposed to market risks primarily associated with changes in interest rates and foreign
currency exchange rates. We use derivative financial instruments to minimize the risks and/or costs
associated with financial activities by managing our exposure to interest rate fluctuations on a
portion of our debt obligations. We also use derivative financial instruments to minimize the risks
caused by currency fluctuations in certain foreign currencies. We do not use derivative financial
instruments for trading or other speculative purposes.
We have significant international operations. The net assets and liabilities of these operations
are exposed to changes in currency exchange rates. These operations may also have net assets and
liabilities not denominated in their functional currency, which exposes us to changes in foreign
currency exchange rates that impact income. We recorded a foreign
currency translation loss in our
income statement of approximately $1.6 million in the first three months of 2010
compared to a gain of $2.2 million in the first three months of 2009. Our foreign currency translation gains and losses are primarily due to
exchange rate fluctuations related to monetary asset balances denominated in currencies other than
the functional currency. Changes in exchange rates may create gains or losses in future periods to
the extent we maintain net assets and liabilities not denominated in the functional currency.
As of March 31, 2010, after taking into consideration interest rate swaps, we had approximately
$280.5 million of outstanding indebtedness that was effectively subject to floating interest rates.
A 1% increase in the effective interest rate would result in an annual increase in our interest expense of approximately
$2.8 million.
For further information regarding our use of interest rate swap agreements to manage our exposure
to interest rate fluctuations on a portion of our debt obligations and derivative instruments to
minimize foreign currency exchange risk, see Note 7 to the Financial Statements.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our principal executive officer and principal financial officer evaluated the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of March
31, 2010. Based on the evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer
have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
accumulated and communicated to management, and made known to our principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, on a timely basis to ensure that it is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the last fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control
over financial reporting.
40
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
In the ordinary course of business we are involved in various pending or threatened legal actions.
While management is unable to predict the ultimate outcome of these actions, it believes that any
ultimate liability arising from these actions will not have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows; however, because of the
inherent uncertainty of litigation, we cannot provide assurance that the resolution of any
particular claim or proceeding to which we are a party will not have a material adverse effect on
our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows for the period in which
the resolution occurs.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
There have been no material changes or updates in our risk factors that were previously disclosed
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, except as follows:
New proposed regulations under the Clean Air Act (CAA), if implemented, could result in increased
compliance costs.
In March 2009, the EPA formally proposed new regulations under the CAA to control emissions of
hazardous air pollutants from existing stationary reciprocal internal combustion engines. The rule,
when finalized by the EPA, may require us to undertake significant expenditures, including
expenditures for purchasing and installing emissions control equipment such as oxidation catalysts
or non-selective catalytic reduction equipment, imposing more stringent maintenance practices, and
implementing additional monitoring practices on a potentially significant percentage of our natural
gas compressor engine fleet. At this point, we cannot predict the final regulatory requirements or
the cost to comply with such requirements. The comment period on the proposed regulation ended on
June 3, 2009, and the EPA has signed a consent decree requiring it to promulgate a final rule no
later than August 10, 2010. Under the proposal, compliance will be required by three years from the
effective date of the final rule. In addition, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality has
recently proposed updates to certain of its permit programs
that, if enacted as proposed, would significantly tighten current emissions standards, which could
impact the operation of specific categories of engines by requiring the use of alternative
engines, compressor packages, or the installation of aftermarket emissions control equipment. These
proposed rules, when finalized, and any other new regulations requiring the installation of more
sophisticated emissions control equipment could have a material adverse impact on our business,
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Climate change legislation and regulatory initiatives could result in increased compliance costs.
The U.S. Congress is considering new legislation to restrict or regulate emissions of greenhouse
gases, such as carbon dioxide and methane, that are understood to contribute to global warming. For
example, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 could, if enacted by the full Congress,
require greenhouse gas emissions reductions by covered sources of as much as 17% from 2005 levels
by 2020 and by as much as 83% by 2050. Recent reports also suggest that major climate legislation
is expected to be proposed in the U.S. Senate in the coming weeks. In addition, almost half of the
states, either individually or through multi-state regional initiatives, have begun to address
greenhouse gas emissions, primarily through the planned development of emission inventories or
regional greenhouse gas cap and trade programs. Although most of the state-level initiatives have
to date been focused on large sources of greenhouse gas emissions, such as electric power plants,
it is possible that smaller sources such as our gas-fired compressors could become subject to
greenhouse gas-related regulation. Depending on the particular program, we could be required to
control emissions or to purchase and surrender allowances for greenhouse gas emissions resulting
from our operations.
Also, as a result of the U.S. Supreme Courts decision on April 2, 2007 in Massachusetts, et al. v.
EPA, the EPA may regulate greenhouse gas emissions from mobile sources such as new motor vehicles,
even if Congress does not adopt new legislation specifically addressing emissions of greenhouse
gases. The Court held in Massachusetts v. EPA that greenhouse gases including carbon dioxide fall
under the CAAs definition of air pollutant. In July 2008, on the basis of this decision, the EPA
released an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding possible future regulation of
greenhouse gas emissions under the CAA. In the notice, the EPA evaluated the potential regulation
of greenhouse gases under several different provisions of the CAA, but did not propose any specific
new regulatory requirements for greenhouse gases. The notice and three other recent regulatory
developments, described below, along with recent statements by the Administrator of the EPA,
suggest that the EPA is beginning to pursue a path toward the regulation of greenhouse gas
emissions under its existing CAA authority. First, in September 2009, the EPA adopted a new rule
requiring approximately 13,000 facilities comprising a substantial percentage of annual U.S.
greenhouse gas emissions to
41
Table of Contents
inventory their emissions starting in 2010 and to report those emissions to the EPA beginning in
2011. On April 12, 2010, the EPA proposed additional portions of this inventory rule relating to
petroleum and natural gas systems that, if adopted, would require inventorying for that category of
facilities beginning in January 2011 and reporting of those inventories beginning in March 2012.
Second, on December 15, 2009, the EPA officially published its finalized determination that
emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and other greenhouse gases present an endangerment to human
health and the environment because emissions of such gases are, according to the EPA, contributing
to warming of the earths atmosphere and other climatic changes. These findings by the EPA pave the
way for the agency to adopt and implement regulations that would restrict emissions of greenhouse
gases under existing provisions of the CAA. Third, the EPA in late September 2009 proposed a rule
that would provide for the tailored application of the agencys major air permitting programs to
facilities that annually emit over 25,000 tons of greenhouse gases, such as large industrial
facilities of the type covered by the inventory rule described above.
Although it is not currently possible to predict how any such proposed or future greenhouse gas
legislation or regulation by Congress, the states or multi-state regions will impact our business,
any legislation or regulation of greenhouse gas emissions that may be imposed in areas in which we
conduct business could result in increased compliance costs or additional operating restrictions or
reduced demand for our products and services, and could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Item 5. | Other Information |
At our Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 4, 2010, we presented the following matters to
the stockholders for action, and the votes cast are indicated below:
For | Withheld | |||||||
1. Election of the following directors: |
||||||||
Janet F. Clark |
47,333,762 | 2,615,187 | ||||||
Ernie L. Danner |
49,747,506 | 201,443 | ||||||
Uriel E. Dutton |
49,572,188 | 376,761 | ||||||
Gordon T. Hall |
49,733,175 | 215,774 | ||||||
J.W.G. Will Honeybourne |
49,574,585 | 374,364 | ||||||
Mark A. McCollum |
49,581,218 | 367,731 | ||||||
William C. Pate |
49,571,853 | 377,096 | ||||||
Stephen M. Pazuk |
49,574,943 | 374,006 | ||||||
Christopher E. Seaver |
49,757,016 | 191,933 |
For | Against | Abstain | ||||
2. Ratification of the appointment of
Deloitte & Touche LLP as Exterran
Holdings, Inc.s independent
registered public accounting firm for
fiscal 2010
|
53,761,337 | 21,785 | 2,208 |
For | Against | Abstain | ||||
3. Approval of Amendment No. 3 to the
Exterran Holdings, Inc. Amended and
Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan
|
37,873,482 | 11,389,218 | 686,248 |
42
Table of Contents
Item 6. | Exhibits |
Exhibit No. | Description | |
2.1
|
Contribution, Conveyance and Assumption Agreement, dated October 2, 2009, by and among Exterran Holdings, Inc., Exterran Energy Corp., Exterran General Holdings, LLC, Exterran Energy Solutions, L.P., EES Leasing LLC, EXH GP LP LLC, Exterran GP LLC, EXH MLP LP LLC, Exterran General Partner, L.P., EXLP Operating LLC, EXLP Leasing LLC and Exterran Partners, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 5, 2009 | |
3.1
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Exterran Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 20, 2007 | |
3.2
|
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Exterran Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 | |
4.1
|
Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated August 20, 2007, by and between Hanover Compressor Company, Exterran Holdings, Inc., and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, for the 4.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2014, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 23, 2007 | |
4.2
|
Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2009, between Exterran Holdings, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 16, 2009 | |
4.3
|
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2009, between Exterran Holdings, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 16, 2009 | |
10.1*
|
Form of Exterran Holdings, Inc. Award Notice for Time-Vested Stock Option for Officers | |
10.2*
|
Form of Exterran Holdings, Inc. Award Notice for Time-Vested Non-Qualified Stock Option | |
10.3*
|
Form of Exterran Holdings, Inc. Award Notice for Time-Vested Restricted Stock | |
10.4*
|
Form of Exterran Holdings, Inc. Award Notice for Time-Vested Restricted Stock (Directors) | |
10.5*
|
Form of Exterran Holdings, Inc. Award Notice for Time-Vested Stock-Settled Restricted Stock Units | |
10.6*
|
Form of Exterran Holdings, Inc. Award Notice for Time-Vested Cash-Settled Restricted Stock Units | |
10.7*
|
Form of Exterran Holdings, Inc. Award Notice for Performance Shares | |
31.1*
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2*
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.1*
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.2*
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. | |
* | Filed herewith. |
43
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
EXTERRAN HOLDINGS, INC. |
||||
Date: May 6, 2010 | By: | /s/ J. MICHAEL ANDERSON | ||
J. Michael Anderson | ||||
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) | ||||
By: | /s/ KENNETH R. BICKETT | |||
Kenneth R. Bickett | ||||
Vice President, Finance and Accounting (Principal Accounting Officer) |
44
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. | Description | |
2.1
|
Contribution, Conveyance and Assumption Agreement, dated October 2, 2009, by and among Exterran Holdings, Inc., Exterran Energy Corp., Exterran General Holdings, LLC, Exterran Energy Solutions, L.P., EES Leasing LLC, EXH GP LP LLC, Exterran GP LLC, EXH MLP LP LLC, Exterran General Partner, L.P., EXLP Operating LLC, EXLP Leasing LLC and Exterran Partners, L.P., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 5, 2009 | |
3.1
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Exterran Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 20, 2007 | |
3.2
|
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of Exterran Holdings, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 | |
4.1
|
Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated August 20, 2007, by and between Hanover Compressor Company, Exterran Holdings, Inc., and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, for the 4.75% Convertible Senior Notes due 2014, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 23, 2007 | |
4.2
|
Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2009, between Exterran Holdings, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 16, 2009 | |
4.3
|
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2009, between Exterran Holdings, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 16, 2009 | |
10.1*
|
Form of Exterran Holdings, Inc. Award Notice for Time-Vested Stock Option for Officers | |
10.2*
|
Form of Exterran Holdings, Inc. Award Notice for Time-Vested Non-Qualified Stock Option | |
10.3*
|
Form of Exterran Holdings, Inc. Award Notice for Time-Vested Restricted Stock | |
10.4*
|
Form of Exterran Holdings, Inc. Award Notice for Time-Vested Restricted Stock (Directors) | |
10.5*
|
Form of Exterran Holdings, Inc. Award Notice for Time-Vested Stock-Settled Restricted Stock Units | |
10.6*
|
Form of Exterran Holdings, Inc. Award Notice for Time-Vested Cash-Settled Restricted Stock Units | |
10.7*
|
Form of Exterran Holdings, Inc. Award Notice for Performance Shares | |
31.1*
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2*
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.1*
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.2*
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. | |
* | Filed herewith. |
45