Annual Statements Open main menu
  1. Annual Statements
  2. » Companies
  3. » Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.
  4. » Quarter Report: 2017 June (Form 10-Q)

Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2017 June (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 10-Q
x    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2017
 
or
 
¨    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from                      to                     
 
Commission file number: 001-35908
 
ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
 
Maryland
46-1214914
(State of Organization)
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 
 
222 Central Park Avenue, Suite 2100
Virginia Beach, Virginia
23462
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(Zip Code)
 
(757) 366-4000
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x  Yes     ◻  No
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).    x  Yes     ◻  No
 
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): 
Large Accelerated Filer
 ◻ 
Accelerated Filer
x
 
 
 
 
Non-Accelerated Filer
 ◻ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller Reporting Company
 ◻ 
 
 
Emerging Growth Company
 x 
 
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.   x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  
◻ Yes     x  No


 
As of August 1, 2017, the Registrant had 44,932,241 shares of common stock outstanding.

Table of Contents

ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.
 
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2017
 
Table of Contents
 
 
Page
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




Table of Contents

PART I. Financial Information
 
Item 1.    Financial Statements
 
ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
 
(In thousands, except par value and share data)
 
 
June 30,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
 
 
(Unaudited)
 
 
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
Real estate investments:
 
 
 
 
Income producing property
 
$
900,782

 
$
894,078

Held for development
 
680

 
680

Construction in progress
 
39,361

 
13,529

 
 
940,823

 
908,287

Accumulated depreciation
 
(152,438
)
 
(139,553
)
Net real estate investments
 
788,385

 
768,734

Cash and cash equivalents
 
18,587

 
21,942

Restricted cash
 
3,139

 
3,251

Accounts receivable, net
 
15,027

 
15,052

Notes receivable
 
73,382

 
59,546

Construction receivables, including retentions
 
45,820

 
39,433

Construction contract costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings
 
53

 
110

Equity method investments
 
10,950

 
10,235

Other assets
 
58,995

 
64,165

Total Assets
 
$
1,014,338

 
$
982,468

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
 
 
 
 
Indebtedness, net
 
$
465,291

 
$
522,180

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
 
9,311

 
10,804

Construction payables, including retentions
 
58,546

 
51,130

Billings in excess of construction contract costs and estimated earnings
 
6,780

 
10,167

Other liabilities
 
39,889

 
39,209

Total Liabilities
 
$
579,817

 
$
633,490

 
 
 
 
 
Redeemable noncontrolling interest
 
2,000

 
—

 
 
 
 
 
Stockholders’ equity:
 
 
 
 
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
 
—

 
—

Common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 44,932,241 and 37,490,361 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively
 
449

 
374

Additional paid-in capital
 
288,162

 
197,114

Distributions in excess of earnings
 
(55,709
)
 
(49,345
)
Total stockholders’ equity
 
232,902

 
148,143

Noncontrolling interests
 
199,619

 
200,835

Total Equity
 
432,521

 
348,978

Total Liabilities and Equity
 
$
1,014,338

 
$
982,468


See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

1

Table of Contents

ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income 

(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
 
 
Three Months Ended 
 June 30,
 
Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
Revenues
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental revenues
 
$
26,755

 
$
24,251

 
$
53,987

 
$
47,534

General contracting and real estate services revenues
 
56,671

 
33,200

 
120,190

 
70,003

Total revenues
 
83,426

 
57,451

 
174,177

 
117,537

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Expenses
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental expenses
 
6,171

 
5,071

 
12,239

 
10,400

Real estate taxes
 
2,595

 
2,382

 
5,104

 
4,731

General contracting and real estate services expenses
 
54,015

 
32,025

 
115,211

 
67,062

Depreciation and amortization
 
9,304

 
8,602

 
18,779

 
16,751

General and administrative expenses
 
2,678

 
2,224

 
5,664

 
4,708

Acquisition, development and other pursuit costs
 
369

 
437

 
416

 
1,141

Impairment charges
 
27

 
—

 
31

 
35

Total expenses
 
75,159

 
50,741

 
157,444

 
104,828

Operating income
 
8,267

 
6,710

 
16,733

 
12,709

Interest income
 
1,658

 
722

 
3,056

 
904

Interest expense
 
(4,494
)
 
(3,978
)
 
(9,029
)
 
(7,769
)
Gain on real estate dispositions
 
—

 
13

 
3,395

 
26,687

Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives
 
(81
)
 
(373
)
 
213

 
(2,762
)
Other income
 
43

 
43

 
80

 
119

Income before taxes
 
5,393

 
3,137

 
14,448

 
29,888

Income tax provision
 
(450
)
 
(6
)
 
(752
)
 
(224
)
Net income
 
4,943

 
3,131

 
13,696

 
29,664

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
 
(1,472
)
 
(1,097
)
 
(4,289
)
 
(10,260
)
Net income attributable to stockholders
 
$
3,471

 
$
2,034

 
$
9,407

 
$
19,404

Net income attributable to stockholders per share (basic and diluted)
 
$
0.08

 
$
0.06

 
$
0.24

 
$
0.62

Weighted-average common shares outstanding (basic and diluted)
 
42,091

 
31,736

 
39,869

 
30,964

Dividends and distributions declared per common share and unit
 
$
0.19

 
$
0.18

 
$
0.38

 
$
0.36


See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

2

Table of Contents

ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Equity
 
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
 
 
 
Shares of common stock
 
Common Stock
 
Additional paid-in capital
 
Distributions in excess of earnings
 
Total stockholders' equity
 
Noncontrolling interests
 
Total Equity
Balance, January 1, 2017
 
37,490,361

 
$
374

 
$
197,114

 
$
(49,345
)
 
$
148,143

 
$
200,835

 
$
348,978

Net income
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
9,407

 
9,407

 
4,289

 
13,696

Net proceeds from sales of common stock
 
7,350,690

 
74

 
91,307

 
—

 
91,381

 
—

 
91,381

Restricted stock awards
 
112,097

 
1

 
1,058

 
—

 
1,059

 
—

 
1,059

Restricted stock award forfeitures
 
(20,907
)
 
—

 
(289
)
 
—

 
(289
)
 
—

 
(289
)
Acquisitions of noncontrolling interests in real estate investments
 
—

 
—

 
(987
)
 
—

 
(987
)
 
982

 
(5
)
Redemption of operating partnership units
 
—

 
—

 
(41
)
 
—

 
(41
)
 
(188
)
 
(229
)
Dividends and distributions declared
 
—

 
—

 
—

 
(15,771
)
 
(15,771
)
 
(6,299
)
 
(22,070
)
Balance, June 30, 2017
 
44,932,241

 
$
449

 
$
288,162

 
$
(55,709
)
 
$
232,902

 
$
199,619

 
$
432,521

 
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

Table of Contents

ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
 
 
Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
$
13,696

 
$
29,664

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 
 
 
Depreciation of buildings and tenant improvements
 
12,930

 
11,105

Amortization of leasing costs and in-place lease intangibles
 
5,849

 
5,646

Accrued straight-line rental revenue
 
(640
)
 
(448
)
Amortization of leasing incentives and above or below-market rents
 
(90
)
 
(49
)
Accrued straight-line ground rent expense
 
273

 
132

Bad debt expense
 
166

 
95

Noncash stock compensation
 
832

 
652

Impairment charges
 
31

 
35

Noncash interest expense
 
560

 
475

Gain on real estate dispositions
 
(3,395
)
 
(26,687
)
Change in the fair value of derivatives
 
(213
)
 
2,762

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
 
Property assets
 
(861
)
 
(2,019
)
Property liabilities
 
(2,778
)
 
(1,543
)
Construction assets
 
(6,495
)
 
3,264

Construction liabilities
 
21

 
(4,136
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
 
19,886

 
18,948

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
 
Development of real estate investments
 
(14,997
)
 
(32,669
)
Tenant and building improvements
 
(4,338
)
 
(2,875
)
Acquisitions of real estate investments, net of cash received
 
(6,767
)
 
(164,978
)
Dispositions of real estate investments
 
4,441

 
92,775

Notes receivable issuances
 
(13,836
)
 
(31,486
)
Decrease in restricted cash
 
(36
)
 
(179
)
Leasing costs
 
(807
)
 
(1,003
)
Leasing incentives
 
(2
)
 
(87
)
Contributions to equity method investments
 
(715
)
 
(8,887
)
Net cash used for investing activities
 
(37,057
)
 
(149,389
)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
 
 
 
 
Proceeds from sales of common stock
 
96,044

 
31,180

Offering costs
 
(4,663
)
 
(793
)
Debt issuances, credit facility and construction loan borrowings
 
73,906

 
185,239

Debt and credit facility repayments, including principal amortization
 
(130,674
)
 
(75,700
)
Debt issuance costs
 
(471
)
 
(559
)
Redemption of operating partnership units
 
(229
)
 
(58
)
Dividends and distributions
 
(20,097
)
 
(15,873
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
 
13,816

 
123,436

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
 
(3,355
)
 
(7,005
)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
 
21,942

 
26,989

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
 
$
18,587

 
$
19,984

Supplemental Disclosures:
 
 
 
 
Noncash transactions:
 
 
 
 
Redeemable noncontrolling interest from development
 
$
2,000

 
$
—

Deferred payment for land acquisition
 
$
600

 
$
—


See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

Table of Contents

ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
 
(Unaudited)
 
1. Business of Organization
 
Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) is a full service real estate company with extensive experience developing, building, owning and managing high-quality, institutional-grade office, retail and multifamily properties in attractive markets primarily throughout the Mid-Atlantic and Southeastern United States. The Company is the sole general partner of Armada Hoffler, L.P. (the “Operating Partnership”). The operations of the Company are carried on primarily through the Operating Partnership and the wholly owned subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership. Both the Company and the Operating Partnership were formed on October 12, 2012 and commenced operations upon completion of the underwritten initial public offering of shares of the Company’s common stock and certain related formation transactions on May 13, 2013.

As of June 30, 2017, the Company's operating property portfolio consisted of the following properties:
Property
    
Segment
    
Location
 
Ownership Interest
4525 Main Street
 
Office
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
Armada Hoffler Tower
 
Office
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
Commonwealth of Virginia-Chesapeake(1)
 
Office
 
Chesapeake, Virginia
 
100
%
Commonwealth of Virginia-Virginia Beach(1)
 
Office
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia
 
100
%
One Columbus
 
Office
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
Two Columbus
 
Office
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
249 Central Park Retail
 
Retail
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
Alexander Pointe
 
Retail
 
Salisbury, North Carolina
 
100
%
Bermuda Crossroads
 
Retail
 
Chester, Virginia
 
100
%
Broad Creek Shopping Center
 
Retail
 
Norfolk, Virginia
 
100
%
Broadmoor Plaza
 
Retail
 
South Bend, Indiana
 
100
%
Brooks Crossing(2)
 
Retail
 
Newport News, Virginia
 
65
%
Columbus Village
 
Retail
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
Columbus Village II
 
Retail
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
Commerce Street Retail
 
Retail
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
Courthouse 7-Eleven
 
Retail
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia
 
100
%
Dick's at Town Center
 
Retail
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
Dimmock Square
 
Retail
 
Colonial Heights, Virginia
 
100
%
Fountain Plaza Retail
 
Retail
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
Gainsborough Square
 
Retail
 
Chesapeake, Virginia
 
100
%
Greentree Shopping Center
 
Retail
 
Chesapeake, Virginia
 
100
%
Hanbury Village
 
Retail
 
Chesapeake, Virginia
 
100
%
Harper Hill Commons
 
Retail
 
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
 
100
%
Harrisonburg Regal
 
Retail
 
Harrisonburg, Virginia
 
100
%
Lightfoot Marketplace(3)
 
Retail
 
Williamsburg, Virginia
 
70
%
North Hampton Market
 
Retail
 
Taylors, South Carolina
 
100
%
North Point Center
 
Retail
 
Durham, North Carolina
 
100
%
Oakland Marketplace
 
Retail
 
Oakland, Tennessee
 
100
%
Parkway Marketplace
 
Retail
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia
 
100
%
Patterson Place
 
Retail
 
Durham, North Carolina
 
100
%
Perry Hall Marketplace
 
Retail
 
Perry Hall, Maryland
 
100
%
Providence Plaza
 
Retail
 
Charlotte, North Carolina
 
100
%

5

Table of Contents

Property
    
Segment
    
Location
 
Ownership Interest
Renaissance Square
 
Retail
 
Davidson, North Carolina
 
100
%
Sandbridge Commons
 
Retail
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia
 
100
%
Socastee Commons
 
Retail
 
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
 
100
%
Southgate Square
 
Retail
 
Colonial Heights, Virginia
 
100
%
Southshore Shops
 
Retail
 
Chesterfield, Virginia
 
100
%
South Retail
 
Retail
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
South Square
 
Retail
 
Durham, North Carolina
 
100
%
Stone House Square
 
Retail
 
Hagerstown, Maryland
 
100
%
Studio 56 Retail
 
Retail
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
Tyre Neck Harris Teeter
 
Retail
 
Portsmouth, Virginia
 
100
%
Waynesboro Commons
 
Retail
 
Waynesboro, Virginia
 
100
%
Wendover Village
 
Retail
 
Greensboro, North Carolina
 
100
%
Encore Apartments
 
Multifamily
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
Johns Hopkins Village(4)
 
Multifamily
 
Baltimore, Maryland
 
80
%
Liberty Apartments
 
Multifamily
 
Newport News, Virginia
 
100
%
Smith's Landing
 
Multifamily
 
Blacksburg, Virginia
 
100
%
The Cosmopolitan
 
Multifamily
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
                                                
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
These properties were sold on July 13, 2017.
(2)
The Company is entitled to a preferred return of 8% on its investment in Brooks Crossing.
(3)
The Company is entitled to a preferred return of 9% on its investment in Lightfoot Marketplace.
(4)
See discussion of redeemable noncontrolling interest in Note 9 for additional information. The Company is entitled to a preferred return of 9% on its investment in Johns Hopkins Village.
*Located in the Town Center of Virginia Beach
 
As of June 30, 2017, the following properties that the Company consolidates for financial statement purposes were under development or construction: 
Property
    
Segment
    
Location
 
Ownership Interest
 
Town Center Phase VI
 
Mixed-use
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
 
Harding Place
 
Multifamily
 
Charlotte, North Carolina
 
80
%
 
595 King Street
 
 
Multifamily
 
Charleston, South Carolina
 
92.5
%
 
530 Meeting Street
 
Multifamily
 
Charleston, South Carolina
 
90
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*Located in the Town Center of Virginia Beach
 
Please see Note 5 for information related to the Company’s investment in Durham City Center II, LLC, which is an unconsolidated subsidiary that the Company accounts for using the equity method of accounting.
 
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
 
Basis of Presentation
 
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”).
 
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the financial position and results of operations of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
 

6

Table of Contents

In the opinion of management, the condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, which are necessary for the fair presentation of the financial condition and results of operations for the interim periods presented.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with the requirements for interim financial information. Accordingly, these interim financial statements have not been audited and exclude certain disclosures required for annual financial statements. Also, the operating results presented for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the entire year. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
 
Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed. Such estimates are based on management’s historical experience and best judgment after considering past, current and expected events and economic conditions. Actual results could differ from management’s estimates.
 
Significant Accounting Policies
 
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared on the basis of the accounting principles described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
On May 28, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued a new standard that provides a single, comprehensive model for recognizing revenue from contracts with customers. While the new standard does not supersede the guidance on accounting for leases, it could change the way the Company recognizes revenue from construction and development contracts with third party customers. The new standard will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. The Company plans to adopt the new standard using the full retrospective method. A substantial portion of the Company's revenue consists of rental revenues from leasing arrangements, such as base rent, which is specifically excluded from the revenue guidance. Non-lease components, such as tenant reimbursements for common area maintenance, will be subject to the revenue guidance. Management is currently evaluating the potential impact of the new revenue standard on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company does not expect the new standard to have a material impact on the measure and recognition of gains and losses on the sale of properties.
 
On February 25, 2016, the FASB issued a new lease standard that requires lessees to recognize most leases in their balance sheets as lease liabilities with corresponding right-of-use assets. The new standard also makes targeted changes to lessor accounting. The new standard will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2019 and requires a modified retrospective transition approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application with an option to use certain transition relief. Management is currently evaluating the potential impact of the new lease standard on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
  
On March 30, 2016, the FASB issued new guidance that will change the accounting for certain aspects of share-based payments to employees.  Entities will be required to recognize the income tax effects of awards in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled, and allows the Company to account for forfeitures as they occur.  The new guidance became effective for the Company on January 1, 2017.  The Company adopted the guidance on January 1, 2017 and it did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

On August 26, 2016, the FASB issued new guidance that addresses eight classification issues related to the statement of cash flows. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. This guidance should be applied retrospectively to each period presented. This new guidance will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2018. Management is currently evaluating the potential impact of the new guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

On February 22, 2017, the FASB issued new guidance that clarifies the scope and application of guidance on sales or transfers of nonfinancial assets and in substance nonfinancial assets to customers, including partial sales. The new guidance applies to all nonfinancial assets, including real estate, and defines an in substance nonfinancial asset. The new

7

Table of Contents

guidance will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted. Management is currently evaluating the potential impact of the new revenue standard on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

3. Segments
 
Net operating income (segment revenues minus segment expenses) is the measure used by the Company’s chief operating decision-maker to assess segment performance. Net operating income is not a measure of operating income or cash flows from operating activities as measured by GAAP and is not indicative of cash available to fund cash needs. As a result, net operating income should not be considered an alternative to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. Not all companies calculate net operating income in the same manner. The Company considers net operating income to be an appropriate supplemental measure to net income because it assists both investors and management in understanding the core operations of the Company’s real estate and construction businesses.

Net operating income of the Company’s reportable segments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was as follows (in thousands): 
 
 
Three Months Ended 
 June 30,
 
Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
 
 
(Unaudited)
Office real estate
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental revenues
 
$
4,759

 
$
5,299

 
$
9,665

 
$
10,820

Rental expenses
 
1,366

 
1,298

 
2,692

 
2,754

Real estate taxes
 
450

 
526

 
900

 
1,065

Segment net operating income
 
2,943

 
3,475

 
6,073

 
7,001

Retail real estate
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental revenues
 
15,578

 
14,113

 
31,209

 
27,145

Rental expenses
 
2,479

 
2,220

 
4,999

 
4,556

Real estate taxes
 
1,520

 
1,330

 
2,969

 
2,614

Segment net operating income
 
11,579

 
10,563

 
23,241

 
19,975

Multifamily residential real estate
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Rental revenues
 
6,418

 
4,839

 
13,113

 
9,569

Rental expenses
 
2,326

 
1,553

 
4,548

 
3,090

Real estate taxes
 
625

 
526

 
1,235

 
1,052

Segment net operating income
 
3,467

 
2,760

 
7,330

 
5,427

General contracting and real estate services
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Segment revenues
 
56,671

 
33,200

 
120,190

 
70,003

Segment expenses
 
54,015

 
32,025

 
115,211

 
67,062

Segment gross profit
 
2,656

 
1,175

 
4,979

 
2,941

Net operating income
 
$
20,645

 
$
17,973

 
$
41,623

 
$
35,344

 
General contracting and real estate services revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 exclude revenue related to intercompany construction contracts of $11.6 million and $17.9 million, respectively. General contracting services revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 exclude revenue related to intercompany construction contracts of $17.5 million and $32.9 million, respectively.

General contracting and real estate services expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 exclude expenses related to intercompany construction contracts of $11.6 million and $17.8 million, respectively. General contracting and real estate services expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 exclude expenses related to intercompany construction contracts of $17.3 million and $32.6 million.

General contracting and real estate services expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 include noncash stock compensation expense of less than $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively. General contracting and real estate services expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 include noncash stock compensation expense of $0.4 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

8

Table of Contents

 
The following table reconciles net operating income to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands): 
 
 
Three Months Ended 
 June 30,
 
Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
 
 
(Unaudited)
Net operating income
 
$
20,645

 
$
17,973

 
$
41,623

 
$
35,344

Depreciation and amortization
 
(9,304
)
 
(8,602
)
 
(18,779
)
 
(16,751
)
General and administrative expenses
 
(2,678
)
 
(2,224
)
 
(5,664
)
 
(4,708
)
Acquisition, development and other pursuit costs
 
(369
)
 
(437
)
 
(416
)
 
(1,141
)
Impairment charges
 
(27
)
 
—

 
(31
)
 
(35
)
Interest income
 
1,658

 
722

 
3,056

 
904

Interest expense
 
(4,494
)
 
(3,978
)
 
(9,029
)
 
(7,769
)
Gain on real estate dispositions
 
—

 
13

 
3,395

 
26,687

Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives
 
(81
)
 
(373
)
 
213

 
(2,762
)
Other income
 
43

 
43

 
80

 
119

Income tax provision
 
(450
)
 
(6
)
 
(752
)
 
(224
)
Net income
 
$
4,943

 
$
3,131

 
$
13,696

 
$
29,664

 
General and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 include noncash stock compensation expense of $0.2 million and $0.2 million, respectively. General and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 include noncash stock compensation expense of $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively.

4. Real Estate Investment
 
Property Acquisitions
 
On January 4, 2017, the Company acquired undeveloped land in Charleston, South Carolina for a contract price of $7.1 million plus capitalized acquisition costs of $0.2 million. The Company intends to use the land for the future development of the 595 King Street property.

Subsequent to June 30, 2017

On July 11, 2017, the Company acquired undeveloped land in Charleston, South Carolina for a contract price of $6.7 million plus capitalized acquisition costs of $0.1 million. The Company intends to use the land for the future development of the 530 Meeting Street property.

On July 25, 2017, the Company acquired the outparcel phase of Wendover Village in Greensboro, North Carolina for a contract price of $14.3 million plus capitalized acquisition costs of $0.2 million.

Property Dispositions
 
On January 20, 2017, the Company completed the sale of the Wawa outparcel at Greentree Shopping Center. Net proceeds after transaction costs were $4.4 million. The gain on the disposition was $3.4 million.

On April 20, 2017, the Company entered into an agreement to sell the Courthouse 7-Eleven property for $2.4 million. This agreement was subsequently terminated.

Subsequent to June 30, 2017

On July 13, 2017, the Company completed the sale of two office properties leased by the Commonwealth of Virginia in Chesapeake, Virginia and Virginia Beach, Virginia. Aggregate net proceeds after transaction costs from the dispositions of the properties were $12.8 million, and the aggregate gain on the dispositions was $4.2 million.


9

Table of Contents



5. Equity Method Investment

City Center

On February 25, 2016, the Company acquired a 37% interest in Durham City Center II, LLC (“City Center”) for purposes of developing a 22-story mixed use tower in Durham, North Carolina. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company has invested $11.0 million and $10.3 million, respectively, in City Center. The Company has agreed to guarantee 37% of the construction loan for City Center; however, the loan is collateralized by 100% of the assets of City Center. As of June 30, 2017, $10.8 million has been drawn against the construction loan, of which $5.5 million is attributable to the Company's portion of the loan.
 
As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the difference between the carrying value of the Company’s initial investment in City Center and the amount of underlying equity was immaterial. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, City Center did not have any operating activity, and therefore the Company did not receive any dividends or allocated income. 
 
Based on the terms of City Center’s operating agreement, the Company has concluded that City Center is a variable interest entity, and that the Company holds a variable interest. The Company does not have the power to direct the activities of the project that most significantly impact its performance.   Accordingly, the Company is not the project’s primary beneficiary and, therefore, does not consolidate City Center in its consolidated financial statements.

6. Notes Receivable

Point Street Apartments

On October 15, 2015, the Company agreed to invest up to $28.2 million in the Point Street Apartments project in the Harbor Point area of Baltimore, Maryland. Point Street Apartments is an estimated $92 million development project with plans for a 17-story building comprised of 289 residential units and 18,000 square feet of street-level retail space. Beatty Development Group (“BDG”) is the developer of the project and has engaged the Company to serve as construction general contractor. Point Street Apartments is scheduled to open in the fourth quarter of 2017; however, management can provide no assurances that Point Street Apartments will open on the anticipated timeline or be completed at the anticipated cost.
 
BDG secured a senior construction loan of up to $67.0 million to fund the development and construction of Point Street Apartments on November 10, 2016. The Company has agreed to guarantee $25.0 million of the senior construction loan in exchange for the option to purchase up to an 88% controlling interest in Point Street Apartments upon completion of the project as follows: (i) an option to purchase a 79% indirect interest in Point Street Apartments for $27.3 million, exercisable within one year from the project’s completion (the “First Option”) and (ii) provided that the Company has exercised the First Option, an option to purchase an additional 9% indirect interest in Point Street Apartments for $3.1 million, exercisable within 27 months from the project’s completion (the “Second Option”). The Company currently has a $2.1 million letter of credit for the guarantee of the senior construction loan.
 
The Company’s investment in the Point Street Apartments project is in the form of a loan pursuant to which BDG may borrow up to $28.2 million (the “BDG loan”). Interest on the BDG loan accrues at 8.0% per annum and matures on the earliest of: (i) November 1, 2018, which may be extended by BDG under two one-year extension options, (ii) the maturity date or earlier termination of the senior construction loan or (iii) the date the Company exercises the Second Option as described further below.
 
In the event the Company exercises the First Option, BDG is required to pay down the outstanding BDG loan in full, with the difference between the BDG loan and $28.2 million applied to the senior construction loan. In the event the Company exercises the Second Option, BDG is required to simultaneously repay any remaining amounts outstanding under the BDG loan, with any excess proceeds received from the exercise of the Second Option applied against the senior construction loan. In the event the Company does not exercise either the First Option or the Second Option, the interest rate on the BDG loan will automatically be reduced to the interest rate on the senior construction loan for the remaining term of the BDG loan.
 

10

Table of Contents

As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had funded $21.5 million and $20.6 million, respectively, under the BDG loan. During the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized $0.4 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of interest income on the BDG loan. During the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized $0.8 million and $0.4 million, respectively, of interest income on the BDG loan. BDG is current on the BDG loan.

Management has concluded that this entity is a VIE. Because BDG is the developer of Point Street Apartments, the Company does not have the power to direct the activities of the project that most significantly impact its performance, nor is the Company the party most closely associated with the project. Therefore, the Company is not the project's primary beneficiary and does not consolidate the project in its consolidated financial statements.

Annapolis Junction

On April 21, 2016, the Company entered into a note receivable with a maximum balance of $48.1 million in connection with the Annapolis Junction residential component of the Annapolis Junction Town Center project in Maryland (“Annapolis Junction”). Annapolis Junction is an estimated $102.0 million mixed-use development project with plans for 416 residential units, 17,000 square feet of retail space and a 150-room hotel. Annapolis Junction Apartments Owner, LLC (“AJAO”) is the developer of the residential component and has engaged the Company to serve as construction general contractor for the residential component. Annapolis Junction is scheduled to open in the third quarter of 2017; however, management can provide no assurances that Annapolis Junction will open on the anticipated timeline or at the anticipated cost.
 
AJAO secured a senior construction loan of up to $60.0 million to fund the development and construction of Annapolis Junction's residential component on September 30, 2016. The Company has agreed to guarantee up to $25.0 million of the senior construction loan in exchange for the option to purchase up to an 88% controlling interest in Annapolis Junction upon completion of the project as follows: (i) an option to purchase an 80% indirect interest in Annapolis Junction's residential component for the lesser of the seller’s budgeted or actual cost, exercisable within one year from the project’s completion (the “First Option”) and (ii) provided that the Company has exercised the First Option, an option to purchase an additional 8% indirect interest in Annapolis Junction for the lesser of the seller’s actual or budgeted cost, exercisable within 27 months from the project’s completion (the “Second Option”).
 
The Company’s investment in the Annapolis Junction project is in the form of a loan under which AJAO may borrow up to $48.1 million, including a $6.0 million interest reserve (the “AJAO loan”). Interest on the AJAO loan accrues at 10.0% per annum and matures on the earliest of: (i) December 21, 2020, which may be extended by AJAO under two one-year extension options, (ii) the maturity date or earlier termination of the senior construction loan or (iii) the date the Company exercises the Second Option as described further below. In the event that the Company exercises the First Option, AJAO is required to simultaneously pay down both the senior construction loan and the AJAO loan by 80%, at which time the interest rate on the AJAO loan will automatically be reduced to the interest rate on the senior construction loan. In the event the Company exercises the Second Option, AJAO is required to simultaneously repay any remaining amounts outstanding under the AJAO loan, with any excess proceeds received from the exercise of the Second Option applied against the remaining balance of the senior construction loan. In the event that the Company does not exercise either the First Option or the Second Option, the interest rate on the AJAO loan will automatically be reduced to the interest rate on the senior construction loan for the remaining term of the AJAO loan. 

As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had funded $40.9 million and $38.9 million, respectively, on the AJAO loan. During the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized $1.0 million and $0.5 million, respectively, of interest income on the AJAO loan. During the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized $2.0 and $0.5 million, respectively, of interest income on the AJAO loan. AJAO is current on the AJAO loan.

Management has concluded that this entity is a VIE. Because AJAO is the developer of Annapolis Junction, the Company does not have the power to direct the activities of the project that most significantly impact its performance, nor is the Company the party most closely associated with the project. Therefore, the Company is not the project's primary beneficiary and does not consolidate the project in its consolidated financial statements.

Decatur

On May 15, 2017, the Company invested in the development of a $34 million Whole Foods anchored center located in Decatur, Georgia. The Company's investment is in the form of a mezzanine loan of up to $21.8 million to the developer,

11

Table of Contents

North Decatur Square Holdings, LLC ("NDSH"). The mezzanine loan bears interest at an annual rate of 15%. The note matures on the earliest of (i) May 15, 2022, (ii) the maturity of the senior construction loan, (iii) the sale of NDSH or (iv) the sale of the center. NDSH is current on this loan.

As of June 30, 2017, the Company had funded $10.8 million on this loan. During the three months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recognized $0.2 million of interest income on this loan.

7. Indebtedness
 
Credit Facility
 
On February 20, 2015, the Operating Partnership, as borrower, and the Company, as parent guarantor, entered into a new $200.0 million senior unsecured credit facility (the "credit facility") that includes a $150.0 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility and a $50.0 million senior unsecured term loan facility. During 2016, the Company increased the borrowings under the term loan facility to $100.0 million. During the first quarter of 2017, the Company increased the borrowings under the term loan facility to $125.0 million, increasing the total capacity of the credit facility to $275.0 million pursuant to the accordion feature.
 
Depending on the Operating Partnership’s total leverage, the revolving credit facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.40% to 2.00% and the term loan facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.35% to 1.95%, in each case depending on the Company's total leverage as defined under the credit agreement. As of June 30, 2017, the effective interest rates on the revolving credit facility and the term loan facility were 2.53% and 2.48%, respectively. The revolving credit facility has a scheduled maturity date of February 20, 2019, with a one-year extension option, subject to certain conditions, and the term loan facility has a scheduled maturity date of February 20, 2020. The Operating Partnership may, at any time, voluntarily prepay any loan under the credit facility in whole or in part without premium or penalty.
 
On February 25, 2016, the Company amended the credit facility to, among other things, allow the maximum leverage ratio of the Company to be increased to 65% for the two consecutive quarters following any acquisition that is equal to or greater than 10% of the Company’s total asset value (as defined in the credit agreement), but only up to two times during the term of the credit facility.
  
As of June 30, 2017, the outstanding balances on the revolving credit facility and the term loan facility were $28.0 million and $125.0 million, respectively.

Other Financing Activity
 
On February 1, 2017, the Company paid off the North Point Center Note 5 in full for $0.6 million.

On February 24, 2017, the Company secured a $29.8 million construction loan for the Harding Place project in Charlotte, North Carolina.

On April 7, 2017, the Company paid off the Harrisonburg Regal note in full for $3.2 million.

On April 19, 2017, the Company entered into a second amendment to the credit agreement for the Lightfoot Marketplace loan, which amended certain definitions and covenant requirements.

On June 29, 2017, the Company secured a $27.9 million construction loan for the Town Center Phase VI project in Virginia Beach, Virginia.

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company borrowed $2.9 million under its construction loans to fund new development and construction.

Subsequent to June 30, 2017

On July 13, 2017, the Company repaid in full the remaining balance of $4.9 million for the mortgage secured by the Commonwealth of Virginia building in Chesapeake, Virginia in conjunction with the sale of this property.

In July 2017, the Company increased its borrowings under the revolving credit facility by $30.0 million.

12

Table of Contents


8. Derivative Financial Instruments
 
The Company may enter into interest rate derivative contracts to manage exposure to interest rate risks. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Derivative financial instruments are recognized at fair value and presented within other assets and liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Gains and losses resulting from changes in the fair value of derivatives that are neither designated nor qualify as hedging instruments are recognized within the change in fair value of interest rate derivatives in the condensed consolidated statements of income. For derivatives that qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss is reported as a component of other comprehensive loss and reclassified into earnings in the periods during which the hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings.

On February 1, 2017, the North Point Center Note 5 was paid in full, which terminated the interest rate swap agreement associated with the note. The loss on the interest rate swap agreement was not significant.

On February 7, 2017, the Operating Partnership entered into a LIBOR interest rate cap agreement on a notional amount of
$50.0 million at a strike rate of 1.50% for a premium of less than $0.2 million. The interest rate cap agreement expires on March 1, 2019.

On June 23, 2017, the Operating Partnership entered into a LIBOR interest rate cap agreement on a notional amount of $50.0 million at a strike rate of 1.50% for a premium of less than $0.2 million. The interest rate cap agreement expires on July 1, 2019.
 
The Company’s derivatives were comprised of the following as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 (in thousands): 
 
 
June 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
 
(Unaudited)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notional
Amount
 
Fair Value
 
Notional
Amount
 
Fair Value
 
 
 
 
Asset
 
Liability
 
 
 
Asset
 
Liability
Interest rate swaps
 
$
56,170

 
$
13

 
$
(574
)
 
$
56,901

 
$
—

 
$
(829
)
Interest rate caps
 
320,000

 
546

 
—

 
270,000

 
259

 
—

Total
 
$
376,170

 
$
559

 
$
(574
)
 
$
326,901

 
$
259

 
$
(829
)

The changes in the fair value of the Company’s derivatives during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 were comprised of the following (in thousands): 
 
 
Three Months Ended 
 June 30,
 
Six Months Ended 
 June 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
 
 
(Unaudited)
Interest rate swaps
 
$
7

 
$
(244
)
 
$
268

 
$
(2,488
)
Interest rate caps
 
(88
)
 
(129
)
 
(55
)
 
(274
)
Total
 
$
(81
)
 
$
(373
)
 
$
213

 
$
(2,762
)
Income statement presentation:
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives
 
$
(81
)
 
$
(373
)
 
$
213

 
$
(2,762
)
Total
 
$
(81
)
 
$
(373
)
 
$
213

 
$
(2,762
)

9. Equity
 
Stockholders’ Equity
 
On May 4, 2016, the Company commenced an at-the-market continuous equity offering program (the “ATM Program”) through which the Company could, from time to time, issue and sell shares of its common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $75.0 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company issued and sold an aggregate of 450,690 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of $14.08 per share under the ATM Program, receiving net proceeds, after offering costs and commissions, of $6.2 million.

13

Table of Contents


On May 12, 2017, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 6.9 million shares of common stock at a public offering price of $13.00 per share, which resulted in net proceeds after offering costs and commissions of $85.3 million.

As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company’s authorized capital was 500 million shares of common stock and 100 million shares of preferred stock. The Company had 44,932,241 and 37,490,361 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. No shares of preferred stock were issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2017 or December 31, 2016.

Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests

The noncontrolling interest holder of Johns Hopkins Village has the option to redeem the 20% noncontrolling interest in that entity (the "Put Option"). Currently, the Put Option may be redeemed for $2.0 million in cash or the equivalent amount in Class A units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership ("Class A Units"), which is in the holder's control. Upon the first anniversary of the certificate of occupancy, which is expected to occur in August 2017, the Put Option may be settled for the fair value of the 20% noncontrolling interest in Johns Hopkins Village, as determined by appraised value. Because the method of the Put Option's redemption is outside of the Company's control, it has been included in temporary equity. If the Put Option is exercised for redemption in the form of Class A Units, the noncontrolling interest will be reclassed into permanent equity.
 
Noncontrolling Interests
 
As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company held a 71.6% and 68.1% interest, respectively, in the Operating Partnership. The Company is the primary beneficiary of the Operating Partnership as it has the power to direct the activities of the Operating Partnership and the rights to absorb 71.6% of the net income of the Operating Partnership. As the primary beneficiary, the Company consolidates the financial position and results of operations of the Operating Partnership. Noncontrolling interests in the Company represent units of limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership not held by the Company. The Company's financial position and results of operations are the same as those of the Operating Partnership. The noncontrolling interest for the consolidated entities under development or construction (see Note 1) was zero as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
 
As of June 30, 2017, there were 16,570,512 Class A Units not held by the Company.
 
As partial consideration for the acquisition of Columbus Village, the Operating Partnership issued 1,000,000 Class B Units on July 10, 2015 and issued 275,000 Class C Units on January 10, 2017. The Class B Units were automatically converted to Class A Units on July 10, 2017. Subject to the occurrence of certain events, the Class C Units will not earn or accrue distributions until January 10, 2018, at which time they automatically will convert into Class A Units.

On January 10, 2017, the Operating Partnership issued 68,691 Class A Units to acquire the remaining 20% interest in the Town Center Phase VI project.

Common Stock Dividends and Class A Unit Distributions
 
On January 5, 2017, the Company paid cash dividends of $6.7 million to common stockholders and the Operating Partnership paid cash distributions of $3.0 million to holders of Class A Units.

On April 6, 2017, the Company paid cash dividends of $7.2 million to common stockholders and the Operating Partnership paid cash distributions of $3.2 million to holders of Class A Units.

On May 5, 2017, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend and distribution of $0.19 per share and unit payable on July 6, 2017 to stockholders and unitholders of record on June 28, 2017.
 
Subsequent to June 30, 2017

On July 6, 2017, the Company paid dividends of $8.6 million to common stockholders and the Operating Partnership paid cash distributions of $3.1 million to holders of Class A Units.


14

Table of Contents

10. Stock-Based Compensation
 
On June 14, 2017, the Company's stockholders approved the Company's Amended and Restated 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Amended Plan"), which, among other things, increased the number of shares of the Company's common stock reserved for issuance under the Amended Plan by 1,000,000 shares, from 700,000 shares to 1,700,000 shares. As of June 30, 2017, there were 1,085,610 shares available for issuance under the Amended Plan.

During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company granted an aggregate of 112,097 shares of restricted stock to employees and non-employee directors with a weighted average grant date fair value of $14.05 per share. Employee restricted stock awards generally vest over a period of two years: one-third immediately on the grant date and the remaining two-thirds in equal amounts on the first two anniversaries following the grant date, subject to continued service to the Company. Non-employee director restricted stock awards vest either immediately upon grant or over a period of one year, subject to continued service to the Company.
 
During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company issued performance-based awards in the form of restricted stock units to certain employees.  The performance period for these awards is three years, with a required two-year service period immediately following the expiration of the performance period. The compensation expense and the effect on the Company’s weighted average diluted shares calculation were immaterial.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recognized $0.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company recognized $0.3 million and $0.9 million, respectively, of stock-based compensation expense. As of June 30, 2017, there were 110,519 nonvested restricted shares outstanding; the total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested restricted shares was $1.0 million, which the Company expects to recognize over the next 20 months.
 
11. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
Fair value measurements are based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability. The hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value is as follows: 
Level 1—quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities 
Level 2—observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities 
Level 3—unobservable inputs 
Except as disclosed below, the carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments approximate their fair value. Financial assets and liabilities whose fair values are measured on a recurring basis using Level 2 inputs consist of interest rate swaps and caps. The Company measures the fair values of these assets and liabilities based on prices provided by independent market participants that are based on observable inputs using market-based valuation techniques.
 
In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. For disclosure purposes, the level within which the fair value measurement is categorized is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
 
The fair value of the Company’s long term debt is sensitive to fluctuations in interest rates. Discounted cash flow analysis based on Level 2 inputs is generally used to estimate the fair value of the Company’s long term debt. Considerable judgment is used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments. The estimates of fair value presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized upon disposition of the financial instruments.
 
The carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments, all of which are based on Level 2 inputs, as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, were as follows (in thousands): 

15

Table of Contents

 
 
June 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
 
Carrying
Value
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Value
 
Fair
Value
 
 
(Unaudited)
 
 

 
 

Indebtedness
 
$
465,291

 
$
466,032

 
$
522,180

 
$
527,414

Interest rate swap liabilities
 
574

 
574

 
829

 
829

Interest rate swap assets
 
13

 
13

 
—

 
—

Interest rate cap assets
 
546

 
546

 
259

 
259

 
12. Related Party Transactions
 
The Company provides general contracting and real estate services to certain related party entities that are not included in these condensed consolidated financial statements. Revenue from construction contracts with related party entities of the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $11.6 million and $8.4 million, respectively, and gross profit from such contracts for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $0.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively. Revenue from construction contracts with related party entities of the Company for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $17.5 million and $14.9 million, respectively, and gross profit from such contracts for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $0.2 million and $0.3 million, respectively.


Real estate services fees from affiliated entities of the Company were not significant for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 or 2016. In addition, affiliated entities also reimburse the Company for monthly maintenance and facilities management services provided to the properties. Cost reimbursements earned by the Company from affiliated entities were not significant for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. 
 
The Operating Partnership entered into tax protection agreements that indemnify certain directors and executive officers of the Company from their tax liabilities resulting from the potential future sale of certain of the Company’s properties within seven (or, in a limited number of cases, ten) years of the completion of the Company’s initial public offering and formation transactions completed on May 13, 2013. In addition, the tax protection agreements provide that the Operating Partnership will offer certain of the original contributors, including certain of the Company’s directors and executive officers, the opportunity to guarantee debt, or, alternatively, to enter into a deficit restoration obligation, for ten years from the closing of the Company’s initial public offering in a manner intended to provide an allocation of Operating Partnership liabilities to the partner for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Pursuant to these tax protection agreements, certain of the Company’s executive officers have guaranteed approximately $0.3 million of the Operating Partnership’s outstanding debt as of June 30, 2017.

The loan for the City Center joint venture is underwritten by a syndicate which includes Park Sterling Bank.  The Chief Executive Officer of Park Sterling Bank is the Chairman of the Company’s Audit Committee.
 
13. Commitments and Contingencies
 
Legal Proceedings
 
The Company is from time to time involved in various disputes, lawsuits, warranty claims, environmental and other matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Management makes assumptions and estimates concerning the likelihood and amount of any potential loss relating to these matters.
 
The Company currently is a party to various legal proceedings. Management accrues a liability for litigation if an unfavorable outcome is determined to be probable and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. If an unfavorable outcome is determined to be probable and a range of loss can be reasonably estimated, management accrues the best estimate within the range; however, if no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other, the minimum amount within the range is accrued. Legal fees related to litigation are expensed as incurred. Management does not believe that the ultimate outcome of these matters, either individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations; however, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties.
 

16

Table of Contents

Under the Company’s leases, tenants are typically obligated to indemnify the Company from and against all liabilities, costs and expenses imposed upon or asserted against it as owner of the properties due to certain matters relating to the operation of the properties by the tenant.
 
Commitments
 
The Company has a bonding line of credit for its general contracting construction business and is contingently liable under performance and payment bonds, bonds for cancellation of mechanics liens and defect bonds. Such bonds collectively totaled $43.0 million and $40.5 million as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
 
The Operating Partnership has entered into standby letters of credit using the available capacity under the senior unsecured credit facility. The letters of credit relate to the guarantee of future performance on certain of the Company’s construction contracts. Letters of credit generally are available for draw down in the event the Company does not perform. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Operating Partnership had total outstanding letters of credit of $4.1 million and $4.1 million, respectively. The amounts outstanding at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 include $2.0 million relating to construction projects and a $2.1 million letter of credit related to the guarantee on the Point Street Apartments senior construction loan.

17

Table of Contents

Review Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc.
 
We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. as of June 30, 2017, and the related condensed consolidated statements of income and cash flows for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 and the condensed consolidated statement of equity for the six-month period ended June 30, 2017. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.
 
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
 
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
 
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. as of December 31, 2016, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein) and we expressed an unqualified audit opinion on those consolidated financial statements in our report dated March 1, 2017. In our opinion, the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
 
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
 
Tysons, Virginia
August 2, 2017

18

Table of Contents

Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
References to “we,” “our,” “us,” and “our company” refer to Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc., a Maryland corporation, together with our consolidated subsidiaries, including Armada Hoffler, L.P., a Virginia limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”), of which we are the sole general partner. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report.
 
Forward-Looking Statements
 
This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. We caution investors that any forward-looking statements presented in this report, or which management may make orally or in writing from time to time, are based on beliefs and assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management. When used, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “plan,” “estimate,” “project,” “should,” “will,” “result” and similar expressions, which do not relate solely to historical matters, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions and are not guarantees of future performance, which may be affected by known and unknown risks, trends, uncertainties and factors that are beyond our control. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected. We caution you that while forward-looking statements reflect our good faith beliefs when we make them, they are not guarantees of future performance and are impacted by actual events when they occur after we make such statements. We expressly disclaim any responsibility to update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. Accordingly, investors should use caution in relying on past forward-looking statements, which are based on results and trends at the time they are made, to anticipate future results or trends.
 
Forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties and you should not rely on them as predictions of future events. Forward-looking statements depend on assumptions, data or methods which may be incorrect or imprecise and we may not be able to realize them. We do not guarantee that the transactions and events described will happen as described (or that they will happen at all). The following factors, among others, could cause actual results and future events to differ materially from those set forth or contemplated in the forward-looking statements:
 
•
adverse economic or real estate developments, either nationally or in the markets in which our properties are located; 
•
our failure to develop the properties in our development pipeline successfully, on the anticipated timeline or at the anticipated costs; 
•
our failure to generate sufficient cash flows to service our outstanding indebtedness; 
•
defaults on, early terminations of or non-renewal of leases by tenants, including significant tenants; 
•
bankruptcy or insolvency of a significant tenant or a substantial number of smaller tenants; 
•
difficulties in identifying or completing development, acquisition or disposition opportunities; 
•
our failure to successfully operate developed and acquired properties; 
•
our failure to generate income in our general contracting and real estate services segment in amounts that we anticipate; 
•
fluctuations in interest rates and increased operating costs;
•
our failure to obtain necessary outside financing on favorable terms or at all; 
•
our inability to extend the maturity of or refinance existing debt or comply with the financial covenants in the agreements that govern our existing debt; 
•
financial market fluctuations; 
•
risks that affect the general retail environment or the market for office properties or multifamily units; 
•
the competitive environment in which we operate; 
•
decreased rental rates or increased vacancy rates; 
•
conflicts of interests with our officers and directors; 
•
lack or insufficient amounts of insurance; 

19

Table of Contents

•
environmental uncertainties and risks related to adverse weather conditions and natural disasters; 
•
other factors affecting the real estate industry generally; 
•
our failure to maintain our qualification as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes; 
•
limitations imposed on our business and our ability to satisfy complex rules in order for us to maintain our qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes; and 
•
changes in governmental regulations or interpretations thereof, such as real estate and zoning laws and increases in real property tax rates and taxation of REITs.
 
While forward-looking statements reflect our good faith beliefs, they are not guarantees of future performance. We disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement to reflect changes in underlying assumptions or factors, of new information, data or methods, future events or other changes after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, except as required by applicable law. We caution investors not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements and urge investors to carefully review the disclosures we make concerning risks and uncertainties in the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as risks, uncertainties and other factors discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and identified in other documents that we file from time to time with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).
 
Business Description
 
We are a full-service real estate company with extensive experience developing, building, owning and managing high-quality, institutional-grade office, retail and multifamily properties in attractive markets primarily throughout the Mid-Atlantic and Southeastern United States. As of June 30, 2017, our operating property portfolio consisted of the following properties:
Property
    
Segment
    
Location
 
Ownership Interest
4525 Main Street
 
Office
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
Armada Hoffler Tower
 
Office
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
Commonwealth of Virginia-Chesapeake(1)
 
Office
 
Chesapeake, Virginia
 
100
%
Commonwealth of Virginia-Virginia Beach(1)
 
Office
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia
 
100
%
One Columbus
 
Office
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
Two Columbus
 
Office
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
249 Central Park Retail
 
Retail
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
Alexander Pointe
 
Retail
 
Salisbury, North Carolina
 
100
%
Bermuda Crossroads
 
Retail
 
Chester, Virginia
 
100
%
Broad Creek Shopping Center
 
Retail
 
Norfolk, Virginia
 
100
%
Broadmoor Plaza
 
Retail
 
South Bend, Indiana
 
100
%
Brooks Crossing(2)
 
Retail
 
Newport News, Virginia
 
65
%
Columbus Village
 
Retail
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
Columbus Village II
 
Retail
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
Commerce Street Retail
 
Retail
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
Courthouse 7-Eleven
 
Retail
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia
 
100
%
Dick's at Town Center
 
Retail
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
Dimmock Square
 
Retail
 
Colonial Heights, Virginia
 
100
%
Fountain Plaza Retail
 
Retail
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
Gainsborough Square
 
Retail
 
Chesapeake, Virginia
 
100
%
Greentree Shopping Center
 
Retail
 
Chesapeake, Virginia
 
100
%
Hanbury Village
 
Retail
 
Chesapeake, Virginia
 
100
%
Harper Hill Commons
 
Retail
 
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
 
100
%
Harrisonburg Regal
 
Retail
 
Harrisonburg, Virginia
 
100
%

20

Table of Contents

Property
    
Segment
    
Location
 
Ownership Interest
Lightfoot Marketplace(3)
 
Retail
 
Williamsburg, Virginia
 
70
%
North Hampton Market
 
Retail
 
Taylors, South Carolina
 
100
%
North Point Center
 
Retail
 
Durham, North Carolina
 
100
%
Oakland Marketplace
 
Retail
 
Oakland, Tennessee
 
100
%
Parkway Marketplace
 
Retail
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia
 
100
%
Patterson Place
 
Retail
 
Durham, North Carolina
 
100
%
Perry Hall Marketplace
 
Retail
 
Perry Hall, Maryland
 
100
%
Providence Plaza
 
Retail
 
Charlotte, North Carolina
 
100
%
Renaissance Square
 
Retail
 
Davidson, North Carolina
 
100
%
Sandbridge Commons
 
Retail
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia
 
100
%
Socastee Commons
 
Retail
 
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina
 
100
%
Southgate Square
 
Retail
 
Colonial Heights, Virginia
 
100
%
Southshore Shops
 
Retail
 
Chesterfield, Virginia
 
100
%
South Retail
 
Retail
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
South Square
 
Retail
 
Durham, North Carolina
 
100
%
Stone House Square
 
Retail
 
Hagerstown, Maryland
 
100
%
Studio 56 Retail
 
Retail
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
Tyre Neck Harris Teeter
 
Retail
 
Portsmouth, Virginia
 
100
%
Waynesboro Commons
 
Retail
 
Waynesboro, Virginia
 
100
%
Wendover Village
 
Retail
 
Greensboro, North Carolina
 
100
%
Encore Apartments
 
Multifamily
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
Johns Hopkins Village(4)
 
Multifamily
 
Baltimore, Maryland
 
80
%
Liberty Apartments
 
Multifamily
 
Newport News, Virginia
 
100
%
Smith's Landing
 
Multifamily
 
Blacksburg, Virginia
 
100
%
The Cosmopolitan
 
Multifamily
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
 
100
%
                                                
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)
These properties were sold on July 13, 2017.
(2)
The Company is entitled to a preferred return of 8% on its investment in Brooks Crossing.
(3)
The Company is entitled to a preferred return of 9% on its investment in Lightfoot Marketplace.
(4)
See discussion of redeemable noncontrolling interest in Note 9 for additional information. The Company is entitled to a preferred return of 9% on its investment in Johns Hopkins Village.
*Located in the Town Center of Virginia Beach

As of June 30, 2017, the following properties that we consolidate for financial reporting purposes were either under development or construction: 
Property
    
Segment
    
Location
Ownership Interest
 
Town Center Phase VI
 
Mixed-use
 
Virginia Beach, Virginia*
100
%
 
Harding Place
 
Multifamily
 
Charlotte, North Carolina
80
%
 
595 King Street
 
Multifamily
 
Charleston, South Carolina
92.5
%
 
530 Meeting Street
 
Multifamily
 
Charleston, South Carolina
90
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
*Located in the Town Center of Virginia Beach
 
Please see Note 5 to our condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for information related to our investment in Durham City Center II, LLC, which is an unconsolidated subsidiary that we account for under the equity method of accounting.

21

Table of Contents

Acquisitions and Dispositions

On January 4, 2017, we acquired undeveloped land in Charleston, South Carolina for a contract price of $7.1 million plus capitalized acquisition costs of $0.2 million. We intend to use the land for the future development of the 595 King Street property.

On January 20, 2017, we completed the sale of the Wawa outparcel at Greentree Shopping Center. Net proceeds after transaction costs were $4.4 million. The gain on the disposition was $3.4 million.

On April 20, 2017, we entered into an agreement to sell the Courthouse 7-Eleven property for $2.4 million. This agreement was subsequently terminated.

On July 11, 2017, we acquired undeveloped land in Charleston, South Carolina for a contract price of $6.7 million plus capitalized acquisition costs of $0.1 million. We intend to use the land for the future development of the 530 Meeting Street property.

On July 13, 2017, we completed the sale of two office properties leased by the Commonwealth of Virginia in Chesapeake, Virginia and Virginia Beach, Virginia. Aggregate net proceeds after transaction costs from the dispositions of the properties were $12.8 million, and the aggregate gain on the dispositions was $4.2 million.

On July 25, 2017, we acquired the outparcel phase of Wendover Village in Greensboro, North Carolina for a contract price of $14.3 million plus capitalized acquisition costs of $0.2 million.

Second Quarter 2017 Highlights
 
The following highlights our results of operations and significant transactions for the three months ended June 30, 2017:
 
•Net income of $4.9 million, or $0.08 per diluted share, compared to $3.1 million, or $0.06 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2016. 
•Funds from operations ("FFO") of $14.2 million, or $0.24 per diluted share, compared to $11.7 million, or $0.24 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2016. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.” 
•Normalized funds from operations (“Normalized FFO”) of $14.7 million, or $0.25 per diluted share, compared to $12.5 million, or $0.26 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2016. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”
•Property segment net operating income (“NOI”) of $18.0 million compared to $16.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016: 
•
Office NOI of $2.9 million compared to $3.5 million 
•
Retail NOI of $11.6 million compared to $10.6 million
•
Multifamily NOI of $3.5 million compared to $2.8 million 
•Same store NOI of $14.4 million compared to $14.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016: 
•
Office same store NOI of $2.3 million compared to $2.6 million
•
Retail same store NOI of $9.6 million compared to $9.6 million 
•
Multifamily same store NOI of $2.5 million compared to $2.7 million 
•General contracting and real estate services segment gross profit of $2.7 million compared to $1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. 
•Third party construction backlog of $116.7 million as of June 30, 2017. 
•Raised $2.8 million of gross proceeds at a weighted average price of $13.97 per share under our at-the-market equity offering program. 
•Raised $89.7 million of gross proceeds at a public offering price of $13.00 per share in a public underwritten offering of 6.9 million shares of our common stock. Net proceeds totaled $85.3 million.
•Declared cash dividends of $0.19 per share and Class A unit.

22

Table of Contents

Segment Results of Operations
 
As of June 30, 2017, we operated our business in four segments: (i) office real estate, (ii) retail real estate, (iii) multifamily residential real estate and (iv) general contracting and real estate services, which are conducted through our taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”). Net operating income (segment revenues minus segment expenses), or “NOI”, is the measure used by management to assess segment performance and allocate our resources among our segments. NOI is not a measure of operating income or cash flows from operating activities as measured by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and is not indicative of cash available to fund cash needs. As a result, NOI should not be considered an alternative to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. Not all companies calculate NOI in the same manner. We consider NOI to be an appropriate supplemental measure to net income because it assists both investors and management in understanding the core operations of our real estate and construction businesses. See Note 3 to our condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a reconciliation of NOI to net income.
 
We define same store properties as those properties that we owned and operated and that were stabilized for the entirety of both periods presented. Same store properties exclude those that were in lease-up during either of the periods presented. We generally consider a property to be in lease-up until the earlier of: (i) the quarter after the property reaches 80% occupancy or (ii) the thirteenth quarter after the property receives its certificate of occupancy.

Beginning with the three months ended March 31, 2017, our calculation of core occupancy included, and in future periods will include, the square footage from ground leases where we are the lessor.  We did not retrospectively apply this new calculation methodology to prior periods. If we were to exclude these ground leases in the calculation of core occupancy, our core occupancy as of June 30, 2017 would have been 96.2%.
 
Office Segment Data 
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
Change
 
2017
 
2016
 
Change
 
 
(unaudited, $ in thousands)
Rental revenues
 
$
4,759

 
$
5,299

 
$
(540
)
 
$
9,665

 
$
10,820

 
$
(1,155
)
Property expenses
 
1,816

 
1,824

 
(8
)
 
3,592

 
3,819

 
(227
)
Segment NOI
 
$
2,943

 
$
3,475

 
$
(532
)
 
$
6,073

 
$
7,001

 
$
(928
)
 
Office segment NOI for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 decreased $0.5 million and $0.9 million, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods in 2016. The decreases are due to decreased occupancy at Armada Hoffler Tower and the sales of the Richmond Tower and Oyster Point office buildings, which contributed $0.3 million and $0.7 million, respectively, in office segment NOI for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016. We completed the sale of Richmond Tower in the first quarter of 2016 and the sale of the Oyster Point office building in the third quarter of 2016.

Office Same Store Results
 
Office same store results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 exclude new real estate development – 4525 Main Street – as well as the Richmond Tower and Oyster Point office buildings, which we sold in the first quarter of 2016 and the third quarter of 2016, respectively.
 

23

Table of Contents

Office same store rental revenues, property expenses and NOI for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows: 
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
Change
 
2017
 
2016
 
Change
 
 
(unaudited, $ in thousands)
Rental revenues
 
$
3,657

 
$
3,867

 
$
(210
)
 
$
7,463

 
$
7,788

 
$
(325
)
Property expenses
 
1,387

 
1,269

 
118

 
2,723

 
2,659

 
64

Same Store NOI
 
$
2,270

 
$
2,598

 
$
(328
)
 
$
4,740

 
$
5,129

 
$
(389
)
Non-Same Store NOI
 
673

 
877

 
(204
)
 
1,333

 
1,872

 
(539
)
Segment NOI
 
$
2,943

 
$
3,475

 
$
(532
)
 
$
6,073

 
$
7,001

 
$
(928
)
 
Office same store NOI for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 decreased 12.6% and 7.6%, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods in 2016 due to decreased occupancy at Armada Hoffler Tower and the relocation of a tenant from One Columbus to 4525 Main Street during the three months ended December 31, 2016. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the NOI from the tenant that relocated to 4525 Main Street is included in Non-Same Store NOI.

Retail Segment Data

 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
Change
 
2017
 
2016
 
Change
 
 
(unaudited, $ in thousands)
Rental revenues
 
$
15,578

 
$
14,113

 
$
1,465

 
$
31,209

 
$
27,145

 
$
4,064

Property expenses
 
3,999

 
3,550

 
449

 
7,968

 
7,170

 
798

Segment NOI
 
$
11,579

 
$
10,563

 
$
1,016

 
$
23,241

 
$
19,975

 
$
3,266

 
Retail segment NOI for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 increased $1.0 million and $3.3 million, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods in 2016. The increases are a result of the acquisitions of Southgate Square, Southshore Shops, Columbus Village II, Renaissance Square, and the 11-property retail portfolio, together with the completion of Lightfoot Marketplace and Brooks Crossing.
  
Retail Same Store Results
 
Retail same store results for the three months ended June 30, 2017 exclude the nine-property retail portfolio, Southgate Square, Lightfoot Marketplace, Southshore Shops, Brooks Crossing, Columbus Village II and Renaissance Square.

Retail same store rental revenues, property expenses and NOI for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
Change
 
2017
 
2016
 
Change
 
 
(unaudited, $ in thousands)
Rental revenues
 
$
13,146

 
$
12,961

 
$
185

 
$
18,861

 
$
18,534

 
$
327

Property expenses
 
3,554

 
3,325

 
229

 
5,300

 
5,160

 
140

Same Store NOI
 
$
9,592

 
$
9,636

 
$
(44
)
 
$
13,561

 
$
13,374

 
$
187

Non-Same Store NOI
 
1,987

 
927

 
1,060

 
9,680

 
6,601

 
3,079

Segment NOI
 
$
11,579

 
$
10,563

 
$
1,016

 
$
23,241

 
$
19,975

 
$
3,266

 
Retail same store NOI decreased 0.5% and increased 1.4%, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 compared to the corresponding periods in 2016. The decrease for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was the result of higher administrative expenses as well as maintenance and repair expenses. The increase for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was the result of higher occupancy, specifically at 249 Central Park Retail and Gainsborough.


24

Table of Contents

Multifamily Segment Data
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
Change
 
2017
 
2016
 
Change
 
 
(unaudited, $ in thousands)
Rental revenues
 
$
6,418

 
$
4,839

 
$
1,579

 
$
13,113

 
$
9,569

 
$
3,544

Property expenses
 
2,951

 
2,079

 
872

 
5,783

 
4,142

 
1,641

Segment NOI
 
$
3,467

 
$
2,760

 
$
707

 
$
7,330

 
$
5,427

 
$
1,903

 
Multifamily segment NOI for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 increased $0.7 million and $1.9 million, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods in 2016, primarily as a result of activity for Johns Hopkins Village, which was placed into service in the third quarter of 2016.
 
Multifamily Same Store Results
 
Multifamily same store results exclude new real estate development – specifically Johns Hopkins Village, which was placed into service in the third quarter of 2016.
 
Multifamily same store rental revenues, property expenses and NOI for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows: 
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
Change
 
2017
 
2016
 
Change
 
 
(unaudited, $ in thousands)
Rental revenues
 
$
4,641

 
$
4,752

 
$
(111
)
 
$
9,437

 
$
9,482

 
$
(45
)
Property expenses
 
2,128

 
2,074

 
54

 
4,239

 
4,136

 
103

Same Store NOI
 
$
2,513

 
$
2,678

 
$
(165
)
 
$
5,198

 
$
5,346

 
$
(148
)
Non-Same Store NOI
 
954

 
82

 
872

 
2,132

 
81

 
2,051

Segment NOI
 
$
3,467

 
$
2,760

 
$
707

 
$
7,330

 
$
5,427

 
$
1,903

 
Multifamily same store NOI for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 decreased 6.2% and 2.8%, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods in 2016. The decreases are primarily due to the decrease in occupancy at the Cosmopolitan attributed to construction activities at an adjacent property and the loss of retail tenants at that property.

General Contracting and Real Estate Services Segment Data
 
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
Change
 
2017
 
2016
 
Change
 
 
(unaudited, $ in thousands)
Segment revenues
 
$
56,671

 
$
33,200

 
$
23,471

 
$
120,190

 
$
70,003

 
$
50,187

Segment expenses
 
54,015

 
32,025

 
21,990

 
115,211

 
67,062

 
48,149

Segment gross profit
 
$
2,656

 
$
1,175

 
$
1,481

 
$
4,979

 
$
2,941

 
$
2,038

Operating margin
 
4.7
%
 
3.5
%
 
1.2
%
 
4.1
%
 
4.2
%
 
(0.1
)%
 
Segment profit for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 increased $1.5 million and $2.0 million, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods in 2016 because of several new large projects started subsequent to the first quarter of 2016.
 

25

Table of Contents

The changes in third party construction backlog for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows: 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
 
(unaudited, $ in thousands)
Beginning backlog
$
157,722

 
$
176,180

 
$
217,718

 
$
83,433

New contracts/change orders
15,519

 
109,289

 
18,960

 
238,790

Work performed
(56,584
)
 
(33,151
)
 
(120,021
)
 
(69,905
)
Ending backlog
$
116,657

 
$
252,318

 
$
116,657

 
$
252,318

 
As of June 30, 2017, we had $27.6 million in backlog on the Point Street Apartments project, $33.4 million in backlog on the City Center project, $17.9 million in backlog on the Annapolis Junction project, and $21.3 million in backlog on the Dinwiddie Municipal Complex project.
   
Consolidated Results of Operations
 
The following table summarizes the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016: 
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
Change
 
2017
 
2016
 
Change
 
 
(unaudited, $ in thousands)
Revenues
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Rental revenues
 
$
26,755

 
$
24,251

 
$
2,504

 
$
53,987

 
$
47,534

 
$
6,453

General contracting and real estate services revenues
 
56,671

 
33,200

 
23,471

 
120,190

 
70,003

 
50,187

Total revenues
 
83,426

 
57,451

 
25,975

 
174,177

 
117,537

 
56,640

Expenses
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Rental expenses
 
6,171

 
5,071

 
1,100

 
12,239

 
10,400

 
1,839

Real estate taxes
 
2,595

 
2,382

 
213

 
5,104

 
4,731

 
373

General contracting and real estate services expenses
 
54,015

 
32,025

 
21,990

 
115,211

 
67,062

 
48,149

Depreciation and amortization
 
9,304

 
8,602

 
702

 
18,779

 
16,751

 
2,028

General and administrative expenses
 
2,678

 
2,224

 
454

 
5,664

 
4,708

 
956

Acquisition, development and other pursuit costs
 
369

 
437

 
(68
)
 
416

 
1,141

 
(725
)
Impairment charges
 
27

 
—

 
27

 
31

 
35

 
(4
)
Total expenses
 
75,159

 
50,741

 
24,418

 
157,444

 
104,828

 
52,616

Operating income
 
8,267

 
6,710

 
1,557

 
16,733

 
12,709

 
4,024

Interest income
 
1,658

 
722

 
936

 
3,056

 
904

 
2,152

Interest expense
 
(4,494
)
 
(3,978
)
 
(516
)
 
(9,029
)
 
(7,769
)
 
(1,260
)
Gain on real estate dispositions
 
—

 
13

 
(13
)
 
3,395

 
26,687

 
(23,292
)
Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives
 
(81
)
 
(373
)
 
292

 
213

 
(2,762
)
 
2,975

Other (expense) income
 
43

 
43

 
—

 
80

 
119

 
(39
)
Income before taxes
 
5,393

 
3,137

 
2,256

 
14,448

 
29,888

 
(15,440
)
Income tax provision
 
(450
)
 
(6
)
 
(444
)
 
(752
)
 
(224
)
 
(528
)
Net income
 
$
4,943

 
$
3,131

 
$
1,812

 
$
13,696

 
$
29,664

 
$
(15,968
)
 

26

Table of Contents

Rental revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 increased $2.5 million and $6.5 million, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods in 2016, as follows: 
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
Change
 
2017
 
2016
 
Change
 
 
(unaudited, $ in thousands)
Office
 
$
4,759

 
$
5,299

 
$
(540
)
 
$
9,665

 
$
10,820

 
$
(1,155
)
Retail
 
15,578

 
14,113

 
1,465

 
31,209

 
27,145

 
4,064

Multifamily
 
6,418

 
4,839

 
1,579

 
13,113

 
9,569

 
3,544

 
 
$
26,755

 
$
24,251

 
$
2,504

 
$
53,987

 
$
47,534

 
$
6,453

 
Office rental revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 decreased 10.2% and 10.7%, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods in 2016 primarily as a result of decreased occupancy at Armada Hoffler Tower and as a result of the sales of the Richmond Tower and Oyster Point office buildings, which contributed $0.4 million and $1.0 million in office rental revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively.  
 
Retail rental revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 increased 10.4% and 15.0%, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods in 2016 as a result of property acquisitions and organic growth in the same store retail portfolio due to higher occupancy rates. The acquisitions of the remaining nine properties of the eleven property retail portfolio, Southgate Square, Southshore Shops, Columbus Village II and Renaissance Square, together with the completion of Brooks Crossing and Lightfoot Marketplace, contributed $1.8 million and $4.7 million in increased retail rental revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, which was partially offset by dispositions.

Multifamily rental revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 increased 32.6% and 37.0%, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods in 2016 as a result of the completion of Johns Hopkins Village, which was placed into service in the third quarter of 2016, and higher occupancy at Encore Apartments and Smith's Landing.
 
General contracting and real estate services revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 increased 70.7% and 71.7%, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods in 2016 because of several new large projects started subsequent to the first quarter of 2016.
 
Rental expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 increased $1.1 million and $1.8 million, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods in 2016, as follows: 
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
Change
2017
 
2016
 
Change
 
 
(unaudited, $ in thousands)
Office
 
$
1,366

 
$
1,298

 
$
68

$
2,692

 
$
2,754

 
$
(62
)
Retail
 
2,479

 
2,220

 
259

4,999

 
4,556

 
443

Multifamily
 
2,326

 
1,553

 
773

4,548

 
3,090

 
1,458

 
 
$
6,171

 
$
5,071

 
$
1,100

$
12,239

 
$
10,400

 
$
1,839

 
Office rental expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2017 increased 5.2% compared to the corresponding period in 2016 as a result of higher repairs and maintenance costs for refurbishing elevator lobbies and higher labor expenses. Office rental expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2017 decreased 2.3% compared to the corresponding period in 2016 due to the sales of the Richmond Tower and Oyster Point office buildings. Retail rental expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 increased 11.7% and 9.7% compared to the respective periods in 2016 as a result of property acquisitions and the completion of development projects that were placed into service subsequent to the first quarter of 2016. Multifamily rental expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 increased 49.8% and 47.2% compared to the respective periods in 2016 primarily due to placing Johns Hopkins Village into service.
 

27

Table of Contents

Real estate taxes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 increased $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods in 2016, as follows: 
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
Change
 
2017
 
2016
 
Change
 
 
(unaudited, $ in thousands)
Office
 
$
450

 
$
526

 
$
(76
)
 
$
900

 
$
1,065

 
$
(165
)
Retail
 
1,520

 
1,330

 
190

 
2,969

 
2,614

 
355

Multifamily
 
625

 
526

 
99

 
1,235

 
1,052

 
183

 
 
$
2,595

 
$
2,382

 
$
213

 
$
5,104

 
$
4,731

 
$
373

 
Office real estate taxes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 decreased 14.4% and 15.5% compared to the respective periods in 2016 due to the sales of Richmond Tower and Oyster Point office buildings. Retail and multifamily real estate taxes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 increased compared to the corresponding periods in 2016 as a result of acquisitions, completion of development projects that were placed into service subsequent to the first quarter of 2016 and increases from new tax assessments.
 
General contracting and real estate services expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 increased 68.7% and 71.8%, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods in 2016 as a result of several new large projects started subsequent to the first quarter of 2016.
 
Depreciation and amortization for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 increased 8.2% and 12.1%, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods in 2016 as a result of property acquisitions and completion of development projects that were placed into service subsequent to the first quarter of 2016.
 
General and administrative expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 increased 20.4% and 20.3%, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods in 2016 as a result of higher regulatory and compliance costs, higher compensation and benefit costs from increased employee headcount and franchise taxes based on our operations in certain states.
 
Acquisition, development and other pursuit costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 decreased compared to the corresponding periods in 2016. Approximately $0.1 million and $0.7 million of the acquisition costs incurred in the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 were related to the acquisition of the 11-property retail portfolio in January 2016.
 
Impairment charges for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 were primarily due to lease terminations.
 
Interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 increased compared to the corresponding periods in 2016 due to higher notes receivable balances.

Interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 increased 13.0% and 16.2%, respectively, compared to the corresponding periods in 2016, primarily as a result of increased borrowings and higher interest rates. 
 
The change in fair value of interest rate derivatives for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was a decrease of $0.1 million compared to a decrease of $0.4 million for the corresponding period in 2016 due to less dramatic changes in forward LIBOR rates. The change in fair value of interest rate derivatives for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was an increase of $0.2 million compared to a decrease of $2.8 million for the corresponding period in 2016. The expense for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was due to dedesignation of our hedge accounting. 
 
During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we recognized a gain of $3.4 million on our sale of the Greentree Wawa outparcel. During the six months ended June 30, 2016, we recognized gains of $26.7 million on our sales of the Richmond Tower office building and the Newport News Economic Authority building.
 
Income tax provisions that we recognized during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 were attributable to the taxable profits and losses of our development and construction businesses that we operate through our TRS.
 

28

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
Overview
 
We believe our primary short-term liquidity requirements consist of general contractor expenses, operating expenses and other expenditures associated with our properties, including tenant improvements, leasing commissions and leasing incentives, dividend payments to our stockholders required to maintain our REIT qualification, debt service, capital expenditures, new real estate development projects and strategic acquisitions. We expect to meet our short-term liquidity requirements through net cash provided by operations, reserves established from existing cash, borrowings under construction loans to fund new real estate development and construction, borrowings available under our senior unsecured credit facility and net proceeds from the sale of common stock.
 
Our long-term liquidity needs consist primarily of funds necessary for the repayment of debt at or prior to maturity, general contracting expenses, property development and acquisitions, tenant improvements and capital improvements. We expect to meet our long-term liquidity requirements with net cash from operations, long-term secured and unsecured indebtedness and the issuance of equity and debt securities. We also may fund property development and acquisitions and capital improvements using our senior unsecured credit facility pending long-term financing.
 
As of June 30, 2017, we had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $18.6 million available for both current liquidity needs as well as development activities. We also had restricted cash of $3.1 million available for property improvements and required maintenance. As of June 30, 2017, we had $117.9 million of available borrowings under our credit facility to meet our short-term liquidity requirements.
 
Credit Facility
 
On February 20, 2015, we entered into a $200.0 million senior unsecured credit facility (the "credit facility") that includes a $150.0 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility and a $50.0 million senior unsecured term loan facility. We intend to use future borrowings under the credit facility for general corporate purposes, including funding acquisitions, development and redevelopment of properties in our portfolio and for working capital.
 
The credit facility includes an accordion feature that allows the total commitments to be increased to $350.0 million, subject to certain conditions. On January 5, 2016, March 31, 2016 and February 1, 2017, we increased the total borrowing capacity to $225.0 million, $250.0 million and $275.0 million, respectively, using this feature. The amount permitted to be borrowed under the credit facility, together with all of our other unsecured indebtedness, is generally limited to the lesser of: (i) 60% of the value of our unencumbered borrowing base properties, (ii) the maximum amount of principal that would result in a debt service coverage ratio of 1.50 to 1.0, and (iii) the maximum aggregate loan commitment, which currently is $275.0 million.
 
The revolving credit facility has a scheduled maturity date of February 20, 2019, with a one-year extension option, subject to certain conditions. The term loan facility has a scheduled maturity date of February 20, 2020. We may, at any time, voluntarily prepay any loan under the credit facility in whole or in part without premium or penalty.
 
The revolving credit facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.40% to 2.00%, depending on our total leverage. The term loan facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.35% to 1.95%, depending on our total leverage. We are also obligated to pay an unused commitment fee of 15 or 25 basis points on the unused portions of the commitments under the credit facility, depending on the amount of borrowings under the credit facility. If we attain investment grade credit ratings from S&P and Moody’s, we may elect to have borrowings become subject to interest rates based on our credit ratings.
 
On February 25, 2016, we entered into an amendment to the credit facility to, among other things, amend the maximum leverage ratio as set forth below.
 
The credit facility requires us to comply with various financial covenants, affirmative covenants and other restrictions, including the following:
•
Total leverage ratio of the Company of not more than 60% (or 65% for the two consecutive quarters following any acquisition that is equal to or greater than 10% of our total asset value (as defined in the credit agreement), but only up to two times during the term of the credit facility); 
•
Ratio of adjusted EBITDA to fixed charges of the Company of not less than 1.5 to 1.0; 

29

Table of Contents

•
Tangible net worth of not less than the sum of $220.0 million and 75% of the net equity proceeds received after December 31, 2014; 
•
Ratio of variable rate indebtedness to total asset value of not more than 30%;
•
Ratio of secured indebtedness to total asset value of not more than 45%; and 
•
Ratio of secured recourse debt to total asset value of not more than 25%.
 
The credit facility limits our ability to pay cash dividends. However, so long as no default or event of default exists, the credit agreement allows us to pay cash dividends with respect to any 12-month period in an amount not to exceed the greater of: (i) 95% of adjusted funds from operations (as defined in the credit agreement) or (ii) the amount required for us (a) to maintain our status as a REIT and (b) to avoid income or excise tax under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. If certain defaults or events of default exist, we may pay cash dividends with respect to any 12-month period to the extent necessary to maintain our status as a REIT. The credit facility also restricts the amount of capital that we can invest in specific categories of assets, such as unimproved land holdings, development properties, notes receivable, mortgages, mezzanine loans and unconsolidated affiliates.
 
We are currently in compliance with all covenants under the credit facility.


30

Table of Contents

Consolidated Indebtedness
 
The following table sets forth our consolidated indebtedness as of June 30, 2017 ($ in thousands): 
 
 
Amount Outstanding
    
Interest Rate(a)
 
Effective Rate for Variable
Debt
    
Maturity Date
 
Balance at Maturity
Secured Debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
249 Central Park Retail
 
$
16,966

(b)
LIBOR+1.95%

 
3.17
%
 
August 8, 2021
 
$
15,959

South Retail
 
7,444

(b)
LIBOR+1.95%

 
3.17
%
 
August 8, 2021
 
7,002

Fountain Plaza Retail
 
10,214

(b)
LIBOR+1.95%

 
3.17
%
 
August 8, 2021
 
9,608

4525 Main Street
 
32,034

(c)
3.25
%
 


 
September 10, 2021
 
30,774

Encore Apartments
 
24,966

(c)
3.25
%
 


 
September 10, 2021
 
24,006

Commonwealth of Virginia – Chesapeake
 
4,933

(d)
LIBOR+1.90%

 
3.12
%
 
August 28, 2017
 
4,933

Hanbury Village
 
20,567

 
6.67
%
 
 

 
October 11, 2017
 
20,499

Lightfoot Marketplace
 
12,894

 
LIBOR+1.90%

 
3.12
%
 
November 14, 2017
 
12,894

Sandbridge Commons
 
9,252

 
LIBOR+1.85%

 
3.07
%
 
January 17, 2018
 
9,129

Southgate Square
 
21,035

 
LIBOR+2.00%

 
3.22
%
 
April 29, 2021
 
18,925

Columbus Village Note 1
 
6,169

 
LIBOR+2.00%

 
3.05
%
(e)  
April 5, 2018
 
6,033

Columbus Village Note 2
 
2,244

 
LIBOR+2.00%

 
3.22
%
 
April 5, 2018
 
2,207

Johns Hopkins Village
 
46,048

 
LIBOR+1.90%

 
3.12
%
 
July 30, 2018
 
46,048

North Point Note 1
 
9,675

 
6.45
%
 
 

 
February 5, 2019
 
9,333

Socastee Commons
 
4,819

(f)  
4.57
%
 
 

 
January 6, 2023
 
4,223

North Point Note 2
 
2,513

 
7.25
%
 
 

 
September 15, 2025
 
1,344

Smith's Landing
 
20,140

 
4.05
%
 
 

 
June 1, 2035
 
—

Liberty Apartments
 
19,845

(f)  
5.66
%
 
 

 
November 1, 2043
 
—

The Cosmopolitan
 
45,556

 
3.75
%
 
 

 
July 1, 2051
 
—

Total secured debt
 
$
317,314

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
$
222,917

Unsecured Debt
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 

Senior unsecured revolving credit facility
 
28,000

 
LIBOR+1.40% to 2.00%

 
2.77
%
 
February 20, 2019
 
28,000

Senior unsecured term loan
 
75,000

 
LIBOR+1.35% to 1.95%

 
2.72
%
 
February 20, 2020
 
75,000

Senior unsecured term loan
 
50,000

 
LIBOR+1.35% to 1.95%

 
3.50
%
(e)  
February 20, 2020
 
50,000

Total unsecured debt
 
$
153,000

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
$
153,000

Unamortized GAAP adjustments
 
(5,023
)
 
 

 
 

 
 
 
—

Indebtedness, net
 
$
465,291

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
$
375,917

                                                
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(a)    LIBOR rate is determined by individual lenders.
(b)    Cross collateralized.
(c)    Cross collateralized.
(d)    This loan was paid in full on July 13, 2017 in conjunction with the sale of the property.
(e)    Subject to an interest rate swap agreement.
(f)    Principal balance excluding fair value adjustments.
 
We are currently in compliance with all covenants on our outstanding indebtedness.


31

Table of Contents

As of June 30, 2017, our principal payments during the following years are as follows ($ in thousands): 
Year(1)
 
Amount Due 
 
Percentage of Total 
2017
 
$
40,235

 
9
%
2018
 
66,735

 
14
%
2019
 
40,818

 
9
%
2020
 
129,482

 
28
%
2021
 
109,862

 
23
%
Thereafter
 
83,182

 
17
%
 
 
 
$
470,314

 
100
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1)    Does not reflect the effect of any maturity extension options.

On February 1, 2017, we paid off the North Point Center Note 5 in full for $0.6 million.

On April 7, 2017, we paid off the Harrisonburg Regal note in full for $3.2 million.

On April 19, 2017, we entered into a second amendment to the credit agreement for the Lightfoot Marketplace loan, which amended certain definitions and covenant requirements.

On July 13, 2017, we paid off the the mortgage loan secured by the Commonwealth of Virginia building in Chesapeake, Virginia for $4.9 million in conjunction with the sale of this property.

Interest Rate Derivatives
 
On February 20, 2015, we entered into a $50.0 million floating-to-fixed interest rate swap attributable to one-month LIBOR indexed interest payments. The $50.0 million interest rate swap has a fixed rate of 2.00%, an effective date of March 1, 2016 and a maturity date of February 20, 2020. We entered into this interest rate swap agreement in connection with the $50.0 million senior unsecured term loan facility that bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.35% to 1.95%, depending on our total leverage.
 
On July 13, 2015, we entered into a $6.5 million floating-to-fixed interest rate swap attributable to one-month LIBOR indexed interest payments. The $6.5 million interest rate swap has a fixed rate of 3.05%, an effective date of July 13, 2015 and a maturity date of April 5, 2018.

On February 7, 2017, we entered into a LIBOR interest rate cap agreement on a notional amount of $50.0 million at a strike rate of 1.50% for a premium of less than $0.2 million. The interest rate cap agreement expires on March 1, 2019.

On June 23, 2017, we entered into a LIBOR interest rate cap agreement on a notional amount of $50.0 million at a strike rate of 1.50% for a premium of less than $0.2 million. The interest rate cap agreement expires on July 1, 2019.
 
As of June 30, 2017, we were party to the following LIBOR interest rate cap agreements ($ in thousands): 
Effective Date
 
Maturity Date
 
Strike Rate
 
Notional Amount
October 26, 2015
 
October 15, 2017
 
1.25
%
 
75,000

February 25, 2016
 
March 1, 2018
 
1.50
%
 
75,000

June 17, 2016
 
June 17, 2018
 
1.00
%
 
70,000

February 7, 2017
 
March 1, 2019
 
1.50
%
 
50,000

June 23, 2017
 
July 1, 2019
 
1.50
%
 
50,000

Total
 
 
 
 
 
$
320,000

 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We have entered into standby letters of credit relating to the guarantee of future performance on certain of our construction contracts. Letters of credit generally are available for draw down in the event we do not perform. As of June 30, 2017, we had aggregate outstanding standby letters of credit totaling $4.1 million that expire during 2017. However, any of our standby letters of credit may be renewed for additional periods until completion of the related construction contracts. The

32

Table of Contents

amounts outstanding at June 30, 2017 include $2.0 million relating to construction projects and a $2.1 million letter of credit related to the guarantee on the Point Street Apartments senior construction loan.
 
Cash Flows
 
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
Change
 
 
($ in thousands)
Operating Activities
 
$
19,886

 
$
18,948

 
$
938

Investing Activities
 
(37,057
)
 
(149,389
)
 
112,332

Financing Activities
 
13,816

 
123,436

 
(109,620
)
Net Increase (Decrease)
 
$
(3,355
)
 
$
(7,005
)
 
$
3,650

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period
 
$
21,942

 
$
26,989

 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period
 
$
18,587

 
$
19,984

 
 
 
Net cash provided by operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2017 increased 5.0% compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016, primarily as a result of timing differences in operating assets and liabilities.
 
During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we invested 75.2% less cash compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016. The primary component of the 2016 investments was our acquisition of the 11-property retail portfolio.
 
Net cash provided by financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2017 decreased 88.8% compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016, primarily as a result of debt and credit facility repayments during the 2017 period, partially offset by increased net proceeds from equity issuances.
 
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
 
We calculate FFO in accordance with the standards established by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”). NAREIT defines FFO as net income (loss) (calculated in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of depreciable operating property, real estate related depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of deferred financing costs) and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.
 
FFO is a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure. Management uses FFO as a supplemental performance measure because we believe that FFO is beneficial to investors as a starting point in measuring our operational performance. Specifically, in excluding real estate related depreciation and amortization and gains and losses from property dispositions, which do not relate to or are not indicative of operating performance, FFO provides a performance measure that, when compared year-over-year, captures trends in occupancy rates, rental rates and operating costs. We also believe that, as a widely recognized measure of the performance of REITs, FFO will be used by investors as a basis to compare our operating performance with that of other REITs.
 
However, because FFO excludes depreciation and amortization and captures neither the changes in the value of our properties that result from use or market conditions nor the level of capital expenditures and leasing commissions necessary to maintain the operating performance of our properties, all of which have real economic effects and could materially impact our results from operations, the utility of FFO as a measure of our performance is limited. In addition, other equity REITs may not calculate FFO in accordance with the NAREIT definition as we do, and, accordingly, our calculation of FFO may not be comparable to such other REITs’ calculation of FFO. Accordingly, FFO should be considered only as a supplement to net income as a measure of our performance. FFO should not be used as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to pay dividends or service indebtedness. Also, FFO should not be used as a supplement to or substitute for cash flow from operating activities computed in accordance with GAAP.

We also believe that the computation of FFO in accordance with NAREIT’s definition includes certain items that are not indicative of the results provided by the Company’s operating property portfolio and affect the comparability of the Company’s year-over-year performance. Accordingly, management believes that Normalized FFO is a more useful performance measure that excludes certain items, including but not limited to, debt extinguishment losses and prepayment penalties, property acquisition, development and other pursuit costs, mark-to-market adjustments for interest rate derivatives and other non-comparable items.
 

33

Table of Contents

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of FFO and Normalized FFO for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP equivalent: 
 
 
Three Months Ended June 30,
 
Six Months Ended June 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
 
 
(unaudited, $ in thousands)
Net income
 
$
4,943

 
$
3,131

 
$
13,696

 
$
29,664

Depreciation and amortization
 
9,304

 
8,602

 
18,779

 
16,751

Gain on real estate dispositions
 
—

 
(13
)
 
(3,395
)
 
(26,257
)
Funds from operations
 
$
14,247

 
$
11,720

 
$
29,080

 
$
20,158

Acquisition, development and other pursuit costs
 
369

 
437

 
416

 
1,141

Impairment charges
 
27

 
—

 
31

 
35

Change in fair value of interest rate derivatives
 
81

 
373

 
(213
)
 
2,762

Normalized funds from operations
 
$
14,724

 
$
12,530

 
$
29,314

 
$
24,096

Net income per diluted share and unit
 
$
0.08

 
$
0.06

 
$
0.24

 
$
0.62

FFO per diluted share and unit
 
$
0.24

 
$
0.24

 
$
0.50

 
$
0.42

Normalized FFO per diluted share and unit
 
$
0.25

 
$
0.26

 
$
0.51

 
$
0.51

Weighted average common shares and units - diluted
 
59,936

 
48,849

 
57,718

 
47,534

 
The adjustment for gain on real estate dispositions excludes the gain recognized in the three months ended March 31, 2016 on the Newport News Economic Authority building because this building was sold before being placed in service.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements that have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to exercise our best judgment in making estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. We base our estimates on historical experience and other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. We evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis, based upon then-currently available information. Actual results could differ from these estimates. We discuss the accounting policies and estimates that are most critical to understanding our reported financial results in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
 
Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
 
The primary market risk to which we are exposed is interest rate risk. Our primary interest rate exposure is LIBOR. We primarily use fixed interest rate financing to manage our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. On a limited basis, we also use derivative financial instruments to manage interest rate risk. We do not use these derivatives for trading or other speculative purposes.
 
At June 30, 2017, approximately $236.3 million, or 50.2%, of our debt had fixed interest rates and approximately $234.0 million, or 49.8%, had variable interest rates. At June 30, 2017, LIBOR was approximately 122 basis points. Assuming no increase in the level of our variable rate debt, if LIBOR increased by 100 basis points, our cash flow would increase by approximately $0.4 million per year as a result of the interest rate caps. Assuming no increase in the level of our variable rate debt, if LIBOR decreased by 100 basis points, our cash flow would increase by approximately $2.3 million per year.

Item 4.    Controls and Procedures
 
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act is processed, recorded, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and regulations of the SEC and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the

34

Table of Contents

desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
 
We have carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, regarding the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2017, the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded, as of June 30, 2017, that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act: (i) is processed, recorded, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
 
There have been no changes to our internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Part II. Other Information
 
Item  1.    Legal Proceedings
 
We are not currently a party, as plaintiff or defendant, to any legal proceedings that we believe to be material or which, individually or in the aggregate, would be expected to have a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations if determined adversely to us. We may be subject to ongoing litigation relating to our portfolio and the properties comprising our portfolio, and we expect to otherwise be party from time to time to various lawsuits, claims and other legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of our business.
 
Item  1A.    Risk Factors
 
There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. 
 
Item 2.    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
 
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
 
None.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 
None.


35

Table of Contents

Item  3.    Defaults on Senior Securities
 
None.
 
Item 4.    Mine Safety Disclosures
 
Not applicable.

Item 5.    Other Information
 
None.
 
Item 6.    Exhibits
 
The exhibits listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index are filed, furnished or incorporated by reference (as applicable) as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.


36

Table of Contents

Signatures
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
 
ARMADA HOFFLER PROPERTIES, INC.
 
 
Date: August 2, 2017
/s/ LOUIS S. HADDAD
 
Louis S. Haddad
 
President and Chief Executive Officer
 
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
Date: August 2, 2017
/s/ MICHAEL P. O’HARA
 
Michael P. O’Hara
 
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
 
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)

37

Table of Contents


Exhibit Index
Exhibit No.
 
Description
10.1
 
Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. Amended and Restated 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (SEC File No. 333-218750) filed June 15, 2017)
 
 
 
15.1
 
Acknowledgment of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
101.INS
 
XBRL Instance Document
 
 
 
101.SCH
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
 
 
101.CAL
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
 
 
101.LAB
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
 
 
 
101.PRE
 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
 
 
 
101.DEF
 
XBRL Definition Linkbase

38