e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the Period Ended September 30,
2010
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
Commission file number
001-31909
ASPEN INSURANCE HOLDINGS
LIMITED
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Bermuda
|
|
Not Applicable
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
Maxwell Roberts Building
1 Church Street
Hamilton, Bermuda
(Address of principal
executive offices)
|
|
HM 11
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants
telephone number, including area code
(441) 295-8201
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the
issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest
practicable date.
As of November 5, 2010, there were 76,685,659 outstanding
ordinary shares, with a par value of 0.15144558¢ per
ordinary share, outstanding.
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
PART I.
|
|
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
|
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as at
September 30, 2010 (Unaudited) and December 31,
2009
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations, for the Three and Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Changes in Shareholders Equity, for the Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income, for the Three and Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows, for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
and 2009
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
|
Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II.
|
|
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
Item 1A.
|
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
|
Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
|
|
Other Information
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
69
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
|
|
70
|
|
CERTIFICATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
EX-31.1 |
EX-31.2 |
EX-32.1 |
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT |
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT |
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT |
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT |
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT |
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT |
1
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at
|
|
|
As at
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income maturities, available for sale at fair value
(amortized cost $5,191.5 and $5,064.3)
|
|
$
|
5,553.0
|
|
|
$
|
5,249.9
|
|
Fixed income maturities, trading at fair value
|
|
|
410.1
|
|
|
|
348.1
|
|
Other investments, equity method
|
|
|
28.7
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
|
Short-term investments, available for sale at fair value
(amortized cost $297.5 and $368.2)
|
|
|
297.5
|
|
|
|
368.2
|
|
Short-term investments, trading at fair value
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
|
6,291.3
|
|
|
|
5,997.0
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
914.3
|
|
|
|
748.4
|
|
Reinsurance recoverables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid losses
|
|
|
263.8
|
|
|
|
321.5
|
|
Ceded unearned premiums
|
|
|
43.4
|
|
|
|
103.8
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting premiums
|
|
|
880.7
|
|
|
|
708.3
|
|
Other
|
|
|
81.9
|
|
|
|
64.1
|
|
Funds withheld
|
|
|
79.0
|
|
|
|
85.1
|
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
187.2
|
|
|
|
165.5
|
|
Derivatives at fair value
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
Receivable for securities sold
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
Office properties and equipment
|
|
|
32.3
|
|
|
|
27.5
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
20.7
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
21.4
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
8,819.6
|
|
|
$
|
8,257.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
ASPEN
INSURANCE HOLDINGS LIMITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 (UNAUDITED) AND
DECEMBER 31, 2009
($ in millions, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at
|
|
|
As at
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
$
|
3,672.2
|
|
|
$
|
3,331.1
|
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
|
951.6
|
|
|
|
907.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total insurance reserves
|
|
|
4,623.8
|
|
|
|
4,238.7
|
|
Payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance premiums
|
|
|
141.9
|
|
|
|
110.8
|
|
Deferred taxation
|
|
|
80.6
|
|
|
|
83.9
|
|
Current taxation
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Accrued expenses and other payables
|
|
|
268.0
|
|
|
|
249.3
|
|
Liabilities under derivative contracts
|
|
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total payables
|
|
|
505.4
|
|
|
|
463.5
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
249.7
|
|
|
|
249.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
5,378.9
|
|
|
$
|
4,951.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingent liabilities (see Note 14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares: 76,642,007 shares of par value
0.15144558¢ each (2009 83,327,594)
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
Preference shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,600,000 5.625% shares of par value 0.15144558¢ each
(2009 4,600,000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,327,500 7.401% shares of par value 0.15144558¢ each
(2009 5,327,500)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,561.5
|
|
|
|
1,763.0
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
1,452.9
|
|
|
|
1,285.0
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes
|
|
|
425.6
|
|
|
|
257.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
3,440.7
|
|
|
|
3,305.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
8,819.6
|
|
|
$
|
8,257.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
ASPEN
INSURANCE HOLDINGS LIMITED
($
in millions, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earned premiums
|
|
$
|
451.7
|
|
|
$
|
470.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,399.2
|
|
|
$
|
1,346.8
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
58.1
|
|
|
|
58.9
|
|
|
|
175.0
|
|
|
|
190.3
|
|
Realized and unrealized investment gains
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
40.1
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
Change in fair value of derivatives
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
|
528.2
|
|
|
|
542.4
|
|
|
|
1,606.5
|
|
|
|
1,538.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
285.8
|
|
|
|
235.1
|
|
|
|
941.3
|
|
|
|
720.6
|
|
Policy acquisition expenses
|
|
|
75.6
|
|
|
|
79.6
|
|
|
|
237.9
|
|
|
|
239.0
|
|
Operating and administrative expenses
|
|
|
65.0
|
|
|
|
63.7
|
|
|
|
180.1
|
|
|
|
172.1
|
|
Interest on long-term debt
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
Net foreign exchange (gains)
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
|
|
(7.9
|
)
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)
|
Other (income)
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|
|
(5.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Expenses
|
|
|
425.1
|
|
|
|
371.3
|
|
|
|
1,362.1
|
|
|
|
1,129.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations before income tax
|
|
|
103.1
|
|
|
|
171.1
|
|
|
|
244.4
|
|
|
|
408.6
|
|
Income tax
|
|
|
(10.3
|
)
|
|
|
(25.3
|
)
|
|
|
(24.4
|
)
|
|
|
(61.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$
|
92.8
|
|
|
$
|
145.8
|
|
|
$
|
220.0
|
|
|
$
|
347.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of ordinary shares and share equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
76,722,965
|
|
|
|
83,056,587
|
|
|
|
77,133,210
|
|
|
|
82,519,807
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
80,363,740
|
|
|
|
85,993,289
|
|
|
|
80,782,187
|
|
|
|
84,952,620
|
|
Basic earnings per ordinary share adjusted for preference share
dividend
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
|
$
|
1.69
|
|
|
$
|
2.63
|
|
|
$
|
4.37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per ordinary share adjusted for preference
share dividend
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
|
$
|
1.63
|
|
|
$
|
2.51
|
|
|
$
|
4.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
($ in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Ordinary shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning and end of period
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preference shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning and end of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change for the period
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
1,763.0
|
|
|
|
1,754.8
|
|
New shares issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.1
|
|
Ordinary shares repurchased and cancelled
|
|
|
(208.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Preference shares repurchased and cancelled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34.1
|
)
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
|
1,561.5
|
|
|
|
1,760.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
1,285.0
|
|
|
|
884.7
|
|
Net income for the period
|
|
|
220.0
|
|
|
|
347.6
|
|
Dividends on ordinary and preference shares
|
|
|
(52.1
|
)
|
|
|
(55.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
|
1,452.9
|
|
|
|
1,176.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
103.4
|
|
|
|
87.6
|
|
Change for the period
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
|
110.1
|
|
|
|
93.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
Reclassification to interest payable
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized appreciation on investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
155.1
|
|
|
|
53.3
|
|
Change for the period
|
|
|
161.4
|
|
|
|
129.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
|
316.5
|
|
|
|
182.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
425.6
|
|
|
|
274.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,440.7
|
|
|
$
|
3,212.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
ASPEN
INSURANCE HOLDINGS LIMITED
($
in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
92.8
|
|
|
$
|
145.8
|
|
|
$
|
220.0
|
|
|
$
|
347.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income, net of taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for net realized (gains)/losses on
investments included in net income
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
(10.7
|
)
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
Change in net unrealized gains on investments
|
|
|
63.8
|
|
|
|
86.1
|
|
|
|
172.1
|
|
|
|
114.3
|
|
Amortization of loss on derivative contract
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Change in foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
65.3
|
|
|
|
105.5
|
|
|
|
168.3
|
|
|
|
135.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
158.1
|
|
|
$
|
251.3
|
|
|
$
|
388.3
|
|
|
$
|
482.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
ASPEN
INSURANCE HOLDINGS LIMITED
($
in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
220.0
|
|
|
$
|
347.6
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
Share-based compensation expense
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
14.8
|
|
Net realized and unrealized (gains)
|
|
|
(38.7
|
)
|
|
|
(7.2
|
)
|
Other investment (gains)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
(20.2
|
)
|
Loss on derivative contracts
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Changes in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
|
357.2
|
|
|
|
154.5
|
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
|
43.9
|
|
|
|
195.6
|
|
Reinsurance recoverables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid losses
|
|
|
58.6
|
|
|
|
(50.6
|
)
|
Ceded unearned premiums
|
|
|
58.6
|
|
|
|
(68.6
|
)
|
Accrued investment income and other receivables
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
|
|
(19.0
|
)
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
(21.5
|
)
|
|
|
(30.4
|
)
|
Reinsurance premiums payables
|
|
|
30.0
|
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
Premiums receivable
|
|
|
(175.5
|
)
|
|
|
(106.7
|
)
|
Funds withheld
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
(16.9
|
)
|
|
|
26.1
|
|
Income tax payable
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
|
Accrued expenses and other payables
|
|
|
(10.8
|
)
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
Fair value of derivatives and settlement of liabilities under
derivatives
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(30.4
|
)
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
502.3
|
|
|
$
|
489.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
ASPEN
INSURANCE HOLDINGS LIMITED
UNAUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
($
in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Purchases) of fixed maturities
|
|
$
|
(1,883.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,064.7
|
)
|
Proceeds from other investments sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
412.2
|
|
Proceeds from sales and maturities of fixed maturities
|
|
|
1,709.3
|
|
|
|
1,536.6
|
|
Net sales/(purchases) of short-term investments
|
|
|
78.5
|
|
|
|
(217.0
|
)
|
Net change in payables for securities purchased
|
|
|
40.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments for acquisitions net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(13.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
(Purchase) of equipment
|
|
|
(12.9
|
)
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) investing activities
|
|
$
|
(81.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(336.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the issuance of ordinary shares, net of issuance
costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.1
|
|
Ordinary shares repurchased
|
|
|
(208.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs from the redemption of preference shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34.1
|
)
|
Dividends paid on ordinary shares
|
|
|
(35.0
|
)
|
|
|
(37.2
|
)
|
Dividends paid on preference shares
|
|
|
(17.1
|
)
|
|
|
(18.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) financing activities
|
|
$
|
(259.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(64.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate movements
|
|
$
|
4.2
|
|
|
$
|
51.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
165.9
|
|
|
|
139.7
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
748.4
|
|
|
|
809.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
914.3
|
|
|
$
|
948.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for income tax
|
|
|
48.4
|
|
|
|
35.8
|
|
Cash paid during the period for interest
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
See accompanying notes to
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
8
NOTES TO
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
|
1.
|
History
and Organization
|
Aspen Insurance Holdings Limited (Aspen Holdings)
was incorporated on May 23, 2002 and holds subsidiaries
that provide insurance and reinsurance on a worldwide basis. Its
principal operating subsidiaries are Aspen Insurance UK Limited
(Aspen U.K.), Aspen Insurance Limited (Aspen
Bermuda), Aspen Specialty Insurance Company (Aspen
Specialty) and Aspen Underwriting Limited (corporate
member of Lloyds Syndicate 4711, AUL),
(collectively, the Insurance Subsidiaries).
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared on the basis of generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States (GAAP)
for interim financial information and in accordance with the
instructions to
Form 10-Q
and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X.
Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and
footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In
the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal
recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation
have been included. Results for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the
results that may be expected for the year ended
December 31, 2010. The unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of Aspen Holdings and
its wholly-owned subsidiaries, which are collectively referred
to herein as the Company. All intercompany
transactions and balances have been eliminated on consolidation.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2009 has been derived
from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date
but does not include all of the information and footnotes
required by GAAP for complete financial statements. These
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended
December 31, 2009 contained in Aspens Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
(File
No. 001-31909).
Assumptions and estimates made by management have a significant
effect on the amounts reported within the consolidated financial
statements. The most significant of these relate to losses and
loss adjustment expenses, the value of investments, reinsurance
recoverables and the fair value of derivatives. All material
assumptions and estimates are regularly reviewed and adjustments
made as necessary, but actual results could be significantly
different from those expected when the assumptions or estimates
were made.
New
Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in 2010
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued revised guidance on the accounting for
variable interest entities. The revised guidance which was
issued as Statement No. 167, Amendments to FASB
Interpretation No. 46R and subsequently codified as
ASC 810 Consolidation, replaces the quantitative
approach previously required for determining the primary
beneficiary of a variable interest entity with an approach
focused on the power to direct activities that significantly
impact an entitys economic performance and the obligation
to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits
from the entity. It also requires ongoing assessment of whether
an enterprise is a variable interest entity (VIE).
The statement is effective for each annual reporting period that
begins after November 15, 2009. In December 2009, the FASB
issued Accounting Standards Update ASU
2009-17,
which codifies SFAS No. 167. The new guidance did not
have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2009, the FASB issued new guidance on the accounting
for the transfer of financial assets. The new guidance, which is
now part of ASC 860 Transfers and Servicing,
eliminates the concept of a qualifying special purpose entity
and therefore any qualifying special purpose entities in
existence before the effective date will need to be evaluated
for consolidation. The criteria for reporting a transfer of
financial assets has also changed. The guidance is effective on
a prospective basis on January 1, 2010
9
and interim and annual periods thereafter. The new guidance did
not have a material impact on our unaudited consolidated
financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU
2010-6,
Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements,
which requires reporting entities to make new disclosures about
recurring or nonrecurring fair value measurements including
significant transfers into and out of Level 1 and
Level 2 fair value measurements and information on
purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis in
the reconciliation of Level 3 fair value measurements. ASU
2010-6 is
effective for annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2009, except for Level 3 reconciliation
disclosures which are effective for annual periods beginning
after December 15, 2010. The new guidance did not have a
material impact on our unaudited consolidated financial
statements.
Accounting
Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
In 2010, the FASBs Emerging Issues Task Force issued ASU
2010-26,
Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing
Insurance Contracts, which require costs to be incrementally
or directly related to the successful acquisition of new or
renewal insurance contracts to be capitalized as deferred
acquisitions costs. This decision would require us to write back
the proportion of our general and administrative deferred
acquisition costs which relate to quoted business which does not
successfully convert into a policy. We are currently undertaking
a review to quantify the impact of this change on our
consolidated financial statements. ASU 2010-26 is
effective for annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2011 and we will not be early adopting this
standard.
On August 16, 2010, we closed our purchase of Aspen America
Insurance Company, a U.S. insurance company with licenses
to write insurance business on an admitted basis in the
U.S. We have paid an amount in cash equal to
$10.0 million plus the amount of the target companys
closing surplus. The company is currently licensed to write
business in 50 states and the District of Columbia.
10
|
|
4.
|
Earnings
Per Ordinary Share
|
Basic earnings per ordinary share are calculated by dividing net
income available to holders of Aspens ordinary shares by
the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding.
Diluted earnings per ordinary share are based on the weighted
average number of ordinary shares and dilutive potential
ordinary shares outstanding during the period of calculation
using the treasury stock method. The following table sets forth
the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
($ in millions, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income as reported
|
|
$
|
92.8
|
|
|
$
|
145.8
|
|
|
$
|
220.0
|
|
|
$
|
347.6
|
|
Preference share dividends
|
|
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)
|
|
|
(17.1
|
)
|
|
|
(18.3
|
)
|
Preference stock repurchase gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to ordinary shareholders
|
|
|
87.1
|
|
|
|
140.2
|
|
|
|
202.9
|
|
|
|
360.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to ordinary shareholders
|
|
|
87.1
|
|
|
|
140.2
|
|
|
|
202.9
|
|
|
|
360.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average ordinary shares
|
|
|
76,722,965
|
|
|
|
83,056,587
|
|
|
|
77,133,210
|
|
|
|
82,519,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average ordinary shares
|
|
|
76,722,965
|
|
|
|
83,056,587
|
|
|
|
77,133,210
|
|
|
|
82,519,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average effect of dilutive securities
|
|
|
3,640,775
|
|
|
|
2,936,702
|
|
|
|
3,648,977
|
|
|
|
2,432,813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
80,363,740
|
|
|
|
85,993,289
|
|
|
|
80,782,187
|
|
|
|
84,952,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per ordinary share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
|
$
|
1.69
|
|
|
$
|
2.63
|
|
|
$
|
4.37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.08
|
|
|
$
|
1.63
|
|
|
$
|
2.51
|
|
|
$
|
4.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary Share Repurchases. On June 23,
2010, an agreement was signed to repurchase 10,835 shares
from the Names Trustee. The shares were repurchased on
July 7, 2010 and subsequently cancelled.
On February 9, 2010, our Board of Directors authorized a
new repurchase program for up to $400 million of our
ordinary shares. The authorization for the repurchase program
covers the period to March 1, 2012. This share repurchase
program was in addition to the completed accelerated share
repurchase program entered into on January 5, 2010. On
September 22, 2010, we initiated an open market repurchase
program to repurchase ordinary shares in the open market. During
the third quarter of 2010, we repurchased in the open market and
subsequently cancelled a total of 264,555 ordinary shares under
the repurchase program.
On January 5, 2010, we entered into an accelerated share
repurchase program with Goldman Sachs & Co.
(Goldman Sachs) to repurchase $200 million of
our ordinary shares. The transaction was completed on
May 26, 2010, when a total of 7,226,084 ordinary shares
were received and cancelled during the first six months of 2010.
The repurchase completes the share repurchase program authorized
by our Board of Directors and announced on February 6,
2008. The repurchase was funded with cash available and the sale
of investment assets.
11
Preference Share Repurchase. On March 31,
2009, we repurchased 2,672,500 of our 7.401% $25 liquidation
price preference shares (NYSE: AHL-PA) at a price of $12.50 per
share. The repurchase resulted in a first quarter gain of
approximately $31.5 million, net of a non-cash charge of
$1.2 million reflecting the write off of the pro rata
portion of the original issuance costs of the 7.401% preference
shares.
Dividends. On October 27, 2010, the
Companys Board of Directors declared the following
quarterly dividends:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend
|
|
Payable on:
|
|
Record Date:
|
|
Ordinary shares
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
November 26, 2010
|
|
November 12, 2010
|
5.625% preference shares
|
|
$
|
0.703125
|
|
|
January 1, 2011
|
|
December 15, 2010
|
7.401% preference shares
|
|
$
|
0.462563
|
|
|
January 1, 2011
|
|
December 15, 2010
|
On January 14, 2010, we announced a new organizational
structure in accordance with the way in which we manage our
insurance and reinsurance businesses as two underwriting
segments, Aspen Insurance and Aspen Reinsurance, to enhance and
better serve our global customer base. In arriving at these
reporting segments, we considered similarities in economic
characteristics, products, customers, distribution, and the
regulatory environment. As discussed above, as a result of our
organizational changes, in 2010 we now manage our underwriting
business in two operating segments: Insurance and Reinsurance.
Under the new organizational structure, our insurance segment is
comprised primarily of the former international insurance and
U.S. insurance segments, with Rupert Villers and John
Cavoores acting as co-CEOs of Aspen Insurance. William
Murray leads our U.S. Insurance business, forming part of
our newly established insurance segment. The reinsurance segment
is led by Brian Boornazian, CEO of Aspen Reinsurance and James
Few, President of Aspen Reinsurance.
Segment profit or loss for each of the Companys operating
segments is measured by underwriting profit or loss.
Underwriting profit is the sum of net earned premiums, losses
and loss expenses, policy acquisition expenses and operating and
administrative expenses. Underwriting profit or loss provides a
basis for management to evaluate the segments underwriting
performance.
Information related to prior periods has been restated to
conform to the current period presentation, where applicable.
Reinsurance Segment. The reinsurance segment
consists of four principal lines of business: property
catastrophe reinsurance, other property reinsurance, casualty
reinsurance and specialty reinsurance.
Property Catastrophe Reinsurance: Property
catastrophe reinsurance is generally written on a treaty excess
of loss basis. Excess of loss reinsurance provides coverage to
primary insurance companies when aggregate claims and claim
expenses from a single occurrence from a covered peril exceed a
certain amount specified in a particular contract. Under these
contracts, we provide protection to an insurer for a portion of
the total losses in excess of a specified loss amount, up to a
maximum amount per loss specified in the contract. In the event
of a loss, most contracts provide for coverage of a second
occurrence following the payment of a premium to reinstate the
coverage under the contract, which is referred to as a
reinstatement premium. A loss from a single occurrence is
limited to the initial policy limit and would not usually
include the policy limit available following the payment of a
reinstatement premium. The coverage provided under excess of
loss reinsurance contracts may be on a worldwide basis or
limited in scope to selected regions or geographical areas.
Other Property Reinsurance: Other property
reinsurance is written on excess of loss, pro rata and
facultative basis (U.S. and international) and includes our
risk solutions business. Treaty excess of loss property treaty
reinsurance provides coverage to a reinsured where it
experiences a loss in excess of its retention level on a single
risk basis, rather than to two or more risks in an
insured event, as provided by catastrophe reinsurance. A
risk in this context might mean the insurance
coverage on one building
12
or a group of buildings due to fire or explosion or the
insurance coverage under a single policy which the reinsured
treats as a single risk. This line of business is generally less
exposed to accumulations of exposures and losses but can still
be impacted by natural catastrophes, such as earthquakes and
hurricanes.
Our treaty pro rata reinsurance product provides proportional
coverage to the reinsured. We share original losses in the same
proportion as our share of premium and policy amounts although
this may be subject to event limits which restrict the amount we
are required to pay if the loss events affect more than one
reinsured policy. Pro rata contracts typically involve close
client relationships and are re-audited annually. Treaty pro
rata business is written on an excess of loss basis for primary
insurers in the U.S. as well as worldwide. This line has
dual distribution with business written both directly and
through brokers. The U.S. property facultative account is
mostly written on a direct basis, whereas the international
account is written both on a direct basis and through brokers.
This line of business is not typically driven by natural perils.
Our risk solutions business writes property insurance risks for
a select group of U.S. program managers.
Casualty Reinsurance: Casualty reinsurance is
written on an excess of loss, pro rata and facultative basis and
consists of U.S. treaty, international treaty, and casualty
facultative. The casualty treaty reinsurance business we write
includes excess of loss and pro rata reinsurance which are
applied to portfolios of primary insurance policies. We also
write casualty facultative reinsurance, both U.S. and
international. Our excess of loss positions come most commonly
from layered reinsurance structures with underlying ceding
company retentions. Our U.S. treaty business comprises of
exposures to workers compensation (including catastrophe),
medical malpractice, general liability, auto liability and
excess liability including umbrella liability. Our international
treaty business reinsures exposures mainly with respect to
general liability, auto liability, professional liability,
workers compensation and excess liability.
Specialty Reinsurance: Specialty reinsurance
is written on an excess of loss and pro rata basis and consists
of credit and surety reinsurance, structured risks, agriculture
reinsurance and specialty lines (marine, aviation, satellite).
Our specialty line of business is composed principally of
reinsurance treaties covering interests similar to those
underwritten in marine, energy, liability and aviation
insurance, as well as contingency, terrorism, nuclear, personal
accident and crop reinsurance. We also write satellite insurance
and reinsurance. Our credit and surety reinsurance business
consists of trade credit reinsurance, international surety
reinsurance (mainly European, Japanese and Latin American risks
and excluding the U.S.) and a political risks reinsurance
portfolio. We also write structured reinsurance contracts
tailored to individual client circumstances. We entered the
agricultural reinsurance market in February 2010 with a new team
working in our Zurich office. This business consists of European
agriculture reinsurance primarily written on a treaty basis
covering crop and multi-peril business.
Insurance Segment. Our insurance segment
consists of property insurance, casualty insurance, marine,
energy and transportation insurance and financial and
professional lines insurance.
Property Insurance: Our property insurance
line comprises U.K. commercial property and construction and
U.S. commercial property (excess and surplus lines basis),
written on a primary, quota share and facultative basis. The
U.S. property team focuses on mercantile, manufacturing,
municipal and commercial real estate business. The U.K.
commercial property insurance team focuses on providing physical
damage and business interruption coverage as a result of
weather, fire, theft and other causes. Our client base is
predominantly U.K. institutional property owners, middle market
corporate and public sector clients.
Casualty Insurance: Our casualty insurance
line comprises U.K. commercial liability, global excess casualty
and U.S. casualty insurance (excess and surplus lines
basis), written on a primary, quota share and facultative basis.
The U.K. commercial liability team focuses on providing
employers liability coverage and public liability coverage
for insureds domiciled in the United Kingdom and Ireland. The
global excess casualty line writes large, sophisticated and
risk-managed insureds worldwide and covers broad-based risks
including general liability, commercial and residential
construction liability, life science, railroads, trucking,
product and public liability and associated types of cover found
in general
13
liability policies in the global insurance market. The
U.S. casualty account primarily consists of lines written
within the general liability, umbrella liability and certain
Errors and Omissions (E&O) insurance segments.
Coverage on our general liability line is offered on those risks
that are primarily contractors (general contractors and
artisans) and other general liability business. Results on our
contractor business for 2009 saw significant adverse development
from prior accident years and consequently, in 2010 we
significantly reduced the amount of contractor business written.
Marine, Energy and Transportation
Insurance: Our marine, energy and transportation
insurance comprises marine, energy and construction
(M.E.C.) liability, energy physical damage, marine
hull, specie, and aviation, written on a primary, quota share
and facultative basis. The M.E.C. liability business includes
marine liability cover mainly related to the liabilities of
ship-owners and port operators, including reinsurance of
Protection and Indemnity Clubs (P&I Clubs). It
also provides cover for the liabilities of companies in the oil
and gas sector, both onshore and offshore and in the power
generation and U.S. commercial construction sectors. In the
energy physical damage line, we provide insurance cover against
physical damage losses in addition to Operators Extra Expenses
(OEE) for companies operating in the oil and gas
exploration and production sector. The marine hull team writes
insurance covering the risks of physical damage for ships
(including war and associated perils) and related marine assets.
The specie business line focuses on the insurance of high value
property items on an all risks basis, including fine art,
general and bank related specie, jewelers block and
armored car. The aviation team focuses on providing physical
damage insurance to hulls and spares (including war and
associated perils) and comprehensive legal liability for
airlines, smaller operators of airline equipment, airports and
associated business and non-critical component part
manufacturers. We also provide aviation hull deductible cover.
Financial and Professional Lines
Insurance: Our financial and professional lines
comprise financial institutions, professional liability
(including management & technology liability) and
financial and political risks, written on a primary, quota share
and facultative basis. Our financial institutions business
consists of professional liability, crime insurance and
directors and officers cover. From a geographical
perspective, the largest sector of the account comprises risks
headquartered in the U.K., the next largest contributors are
from Australia and the U.S. and, of the remainder, the
largest amounts of business are from institutions in Canada,
Western Europe and Scandinavia. We write both primary and excess
of loss coverage for all types of financial institutions
including commercial and investment banks, asset managers,
insurance companies, stockbrokers and insureds with hybrid
business models. Our U.K. based professional liability team
writes an international portfolio of professional liability
risks. The majority of our business emanates from the U.K. with
some Australian and European business. We insure a wide range of
professions including lawyers, surveyors, accountants,
engineers, contractors and financial advisors. Risks are written
on both a primary and excess of loss basis. In 2010, we
commenced writing professional lines business through a new
U.S.-based
team. The business written covers a number of professions
including lawyers, accountants, architects and engineers. We
also write directors and officers insurance,
technology-related policies in the areas of network privacy,
misuse of data and cyber liability and warranty and indemnity
insurance in connection with, or to facilitate, corporate
transactions. Coverage is written on both a primary and excess
basis. The financial and political risks team writes business
covering the credit/default risk on a variety of project and
trade transactions, as well as political risks, terrorism
(including multi-year war on land cover) and kidnap and ransom
(K&R). We write financial and political risks
worldwide but with concentrations in a number of key countries,
such as China, Egypt, Kazakhstan, Russia, South Korea,
Switzerland, U.K. and Turkey.
Non-underwriting Disclosures: We have provided
additional disclosures for corporate and other
(non-underwriting) income and expenses. Corporate and other
includes net investment income, net realized and unrealized
investment gains or losses, corporate expenses, interest
expense, net realized and unrealized foreign exchange gains or
losses and income taxes, which are not allocated to the
underwriting segments.
14
The following tables provide a summary of gross and net written
and earned premiums, underwriting results, ratios and reserves
for each of our business segments for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Underwriting revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross written premiums
|
|
$
|
236.0
|
|
|
$
|
179.8
|
|
|
$
|
415.8
|
|
Net written premiums
|
|
|
229.6
|
|
|
|
147.4
|
|
|
|
377.0
|
|
Gross earned premiums
|
|
|
277.9
|
|
|
|
225.4
|
|
|
|
503.3
|
|
Net earned premiums
|
|
|
267.5
|
|
|
|
184.2
|
|
|
|
451.7
|
|
Underwriting Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss expenses
|
|
|
143.5
|
|
|
|
142.3
|
|
|
|
285.8
|
|
Policy acquisition expenses
|
|
|
43.9
|
|
|
|
31.7
|
|
|
|
75.6
|
|
Operating and administrative expenses
|
|
|
27.1
|
|
|
|
23.6
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting profit/(loss)
|
|
|
53.0
|
|
|
|
(13.4
|
)
|
|
|
39.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.3
|
)
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58.1
|
|
Realized investment gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.1
|
|
Change in fair value of derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)
|
Interest on long term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
Net foreign exchange gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
103.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserves for loss and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
$
|
2,242.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,165.5
|
|
|
$
|
3,408.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss ratio
|
|
|
53.6
|
%
|
|
|
77.3
|
%
|
|
|
63.3
|
%
|
Policy acquisition expense ratio
|
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
|
|
17.2
|
%
|
|
|
16.7
|
%
|
Operating and administrative expense ratio
|
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
|
14.4
|
%
|
Expense ratio
|
|
|
26.5
|
%
|
|
|
30.0
|
%
|
|
|
31.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio
|
|
|
80.1
|
%
|
|
|
107.3
|
%
|
|
|
94.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Underwriting revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross written premiums
|
|
$
|
296.1
|
|
|
$
|
194.2
|
|
|
$
|
490.3
|
|
Net written premiums
|
|
|
289.3
|
|
|
|
172.8
|
|
|
|
462.1
|
|
Gross earned premiums
|
|
|
301.4
|
|
|
|
220.8
|
|
|
|
522.2
|
|
Net earned premiums
|
|
|
288.4
|
|
|
|
182.5
|
|
|
|
470.9
|
|
Underwriting Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss expenses
|
|
|
127.1
|
|
|
|
108.0
|
|
|
|
235.1
|
|
Policy acquisition expenses
|
|
|
49.3
|
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
|
|
79.6
|
|
Operating and administrative expenses
|
|
|
25.7
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
|
|
|
49.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting profit
|
|
|
86.3
|
|
|
|
20.9
|
|
|
|
107.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.7
|
)
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58.9
|
|
Realized investment gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
Change in fair value of derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
Interest on long term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
Net foreign exchange gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.9
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
171.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserves for loss and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
$
|
2,106.3
|
|
|
$
|
874.2
|
|
|
$
|
2,980.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss ratio
|
|
|
44.1
|
%
|
|
|
59.2
|
%
|
|
|
49.9
|
%
|
Policy acquisition expense ratio
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
|
|
16.9
|
%
|
Operating and administrative expense ratio
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
Expense ratio
|
|
|
26.0
|
%
|
|
|
29.4
|
%
|
|
|
30.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio
|
|
|
70.1
|
%
|
|
|
88.6
|
%
|
|
|
80.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
The following tables provide a summary of gross and net written
and earned premiums, underwriting results, ratios and reserves
for each of our business segments for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Underwriting revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross written premiums
|
|
$
|
1,009.4
|
|
|
$
|
654.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,664.0
|
|
Net written premiums
|
|
|
970.0
|
|
|
|
525.9
|
|
|
|
1,495.9
|
|
Gross earned premiums
|
|
|
882.5
|
|
|
|
661.4
|
|
|
|
1,543.9
|
|
Net earned premiums
|
|
|
849.7
|
|
|
|
549.5
|
|
|
|
1,399.2
|
|
Underwriting Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss expenses
|
|
|
546.7
|
|
|
|
394.6
|
|
|
|
941.3
|
|
Policy acquisition expenses
|
|
|
143.6
|
|
|
|
94.3
|
|
|
|
237.9
|
|
Operating and administrative expenses
|
|
|
79.5
|
|
|
|
65.9
|
|
|
|
145.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting profit/(loss)
|
|
|
79.9
|
|
|
|
(5.3
|
)
|
|
|
74.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34.7
|
)
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175.0
|
|
Realized investment gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.1
|
|
Change in fair value of derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)
|
Interest on long term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.7
|
)
|
Net foreign exchange gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
244.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserves for loss and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
$
|
2,242.9
|
|
|
$
|
1,165.5
|
|
|
$
|
3,408.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss ratio
|
|
|
64.3
|
%
|
|
|
71.8
|
%
|
|
|
67.3
|
%
|
Policy acquisition expense ratio
|
|
|
16.9
|
%
|
|
|
17.2
|
%
|
|
|
17.0
|
%
|
Operating and administrative expense ratio
|
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
Expense ratio
|
|
|
26.3
|
%
|
|
|
29.2
|
%
|
|
|
29.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio
|
|
|
90.6
|
%
|
|
|
101.0
|
%
|
|
|
97.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Underwriting revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross written premiums
|
|
$
|
1,006.3
|
|
|
$
|
655.1
|
|
|
$
|
1,661.4
|
|
Net written premiums
|
|
|
958.4
|
|
|
|
495.0
|
|
|
|
1,453.4
|
|
Gross earned premiums
|
|
|
857.9
|
|
|
|
648.8
|
|
|
|
1,506.7
|
|
Net earned premiums
|
|
|
819.1
|
|
|
|
527.7
|
|
|
|
1,346.8
|
|
Underwriting Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss expenses
|
|
|
352.0
|
|
|
|
368.6
|
|
|
|
720.6
|
|
Policy acquisition expenses
|
|
|
152.5
|
|
|
|
86.5
|
|
|
|
239.0
|
|
Operating and administrative expenses
|
|
|
67.2
|
|
|
|
70.7
|
|
|
|
137.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting profit
|
|
|
247.4
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
249.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34.2
|
)
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190.3
|
|
Realized investment gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
Change in fair value of derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)
|
Interest on long term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.8
|
)
|
Net foreign exchange gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
408.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserves for loss and loss adjustment expenses
|
|
$
|
2,106.3
|
|
|
$
|
874.2
|
|
|
$
|
2,980.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss ratio
|
|
|
43.0
|
%
|
|
|
69.9
|
%
|
|
|
53.5
|
%
|
Policy acquisition expense ratio
|
|
|
18.6
|
%
|
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
|
|
17.7
|
%
|
Operating and administrative expense ratio
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
Expense ratio
|
|
|
26.8
|
%
|
|
|
29.8
|
%
|
|
|
30.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio
|
|
|
69.8
|
%
|
|
|
99.7
|
%
|
|
|
84.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
Fixed Maturities
Available-For-Sale. The
following presents the cost, gross unrealized gains and losses,
and estimated fair value of available for sale investments in
fixed maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost or
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
U.S. Government Securities
|
|
$
|
747.0
|
|
|
$
|
47.5
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
794.5
|
|
U.S. Agency Securities
|
|
|
312.0
|
|
|
|
32.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
344.0
|
|
Municipal Securities
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34.1
|
|
Corporate Securities
|
|
|
2,241.9
|
|
|
|
175.4
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
2,417.2
|
|
Foreign Government Securities
|
|
|
567.9
|
|
|
|
26.2
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
594.0
|
|
Asset-backed Securities
|
|
|
70.3
|
|
|
|
6.1
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
76.3
|
|
Non-agency Residential Mortgage-backed Securities
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.4
|
|
Non-agency Commercial Mortgage-backed Securities
|
|
|
140.1
|
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150.5
|
|
Agency Mortgage-backed Securities
|
|
|
1,049.7
|
|
|
|
52.4
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
1,102.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed income
|
|
|
5,191.4
|
|
|
|
362.0
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
5,553.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short term Investments
|
|
|
297.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,488.9
|
|
|
$
|
362.0
|
|
|
$
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,850.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost or
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government Securities
|
|
$
|
492.1
|
|
|
$
|
17.4
|
|
|
$
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
507.5
|
|
U.S. Agency Securities
|
|
|
368.6
|
|
|
|
20.7
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
389.1
|
|
Municipal Securities
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
19.5
|
|
Corporate Securities
|
|
|
2,178.1
|
|
|
|
90.3
|
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
|
|
2,264.6
|
|
Foreign Government Securities
|
|
|
509.9
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
522.3
|
|
Asset-backed Securities
|
|
|
110.0
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115.1
|
|
Non-agency Residential Mortgage-backed Securities
|
|
|
34.2
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
42.2
|
|
Non-agency Commercial Mortgage-backed Securities
|
|
|
178.5
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
180.0
|
|
Agency Mortgage-backed Securities
|
|
|
1,172.9
|
|
|
|
40.2
|
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
1,209.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed income
|
|
|
5,064.3
|
|
|
|
198.7
|
|
|
|
(13.1
|
)
|
|
|
5,249.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short term Investments
|
|
|
368.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
368.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,432.5
|
|
|
$
|
198.7
|
|
|
$
|
(13.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,618.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
The following table provides the contractual maturity
distribution of our available for sale fixed income investments
as of September 30, 2010. Actual maturities may differ from
contractual maturities because issuers of securities may have
the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or
prepayment penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Cost or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Due one year or less
|
|
$
|
335.2
|
|
|
$
|
341.5
|
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
2,325.2
|
|
|
|
2,460.0
|
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
1,139.5
|
|
|
|
1,268.7
|
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
101.1
|
|
|
|
113.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
3,901.0
|
|
|
|
4,183.8
|
|
Non-agency Residential Mortgage-backed Securities
|
|
|
30.3
|
|
|
|
40.4
|
|
Non-agency Commercial Mortgage-backed Securities
|
|
|
140.1
|
|
|
|
150.5
|
|
Agency Mortgage-backed Securities
|
|
|
1,049.7
|
|
|
|
1,102.0
|
|
Other asset-backed Securities
|
|
|
70.3
|
|
|
|
76.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,191.4
|
|
|
$
|
5,553.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Maturities Trading. The
following tables present the cost, gross unrealized gains and
losses, and estimated fair value of trading investments in fixed
maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Cost or
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
U.S. Government Securities
|
|
$
|
42.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
42.8
|
|
U.S. Agency Securities
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
Municipal Securities
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
Corporate Securities
|
|
|
323.0
|
|
|
|
26.3
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
349.2
|
|
Foreign Government Securities
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
Asset Backed Securities
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed income
|
|
|
382.4
|
|
|
|
27.8
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
410.1
|
|
Short term Investments
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
384.4
|
|
|
$
|
27.8
|
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
412.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Cost or
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
U.S. Government Securities
|
|
$
|
7.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
6.5
|
|
U.S. Agency Securities
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Municipal Securities
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
Corporate Securities
|
|
|
313.2
|
|
|
|
16.6
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
329.4
|
|
Foreign Government Securities
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Asset Backed Securities
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed income
|
|
|
332.5
|
|
|
|
16.8
|
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
|
348.1
|
|
Short term Investments
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
336.0
|
|
|
$
|
16.8
|
|
|
$
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
351.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
The Company classifies these financial instruments as held for
trading as this most closely reflects the facts and
circumstances of the investments held. The trading portfolio was
established in 2009.
Gross unrealized loss. The following tables
summarize as at September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, by type of security, the aggregate fair value and gross
unrealized loss by length of time the security has been in an
unrealized loss position for our available for sale portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
0-12 months
|
|
|
Over 12 months
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
U.S. Government Securities
|
|
$
|
12.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
12.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
U.S. Agency Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Government Securities
|
|
|
45.9
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Municipal Securities
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Securities
|
|
|
35.7
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.9
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Asset-backed Securities
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Non-agency Residential Mortgage- backed Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-agency Commercial Mortgage-backed Securities
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency Mortgage-backed Securities
|
|
|
29.9
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30.9
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
132.2
|
|
|
$
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
11.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
143.4
|
|
|
$
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
0-12 months
|
|
|
Over 12 months
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
U.S. Government Securities
|
|
$
|
121.2
|
|
|
$
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
121.2
|
|
|
$
|
(2.0
|
)
|
U.S. Agency Securities
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
Municipal Securities
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
Foreign Government Securities
|
|
|
113.2
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113.2
|
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
Corporate Securities
|
|
|
319.5
|
|
|
|
(3.6
|
)
|
|
|
20.0
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
339.5
|
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)
|
Asset-backed Securities
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency Mortgage-backed Securities
|
|
|
307.5
|
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308.7
|
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
Non-agency Residential Mortgage- backed Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Non-agency Commercial Mortgage-backed Securities
|
|
|
14.6
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
43.8
|
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
58.4
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
901.5
|
|
|
$
|
(11.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
71.5
|
|
|
$
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
973.0
|
|
|
$
|
(13.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at September 30, 2010, the Company held 56 fixed
maturities (December 31, 2009 277 fixed
maturities) in an unrealized loss position with a fair value of
$143.4 million (December 31, 2009
$973.0 million) and gross unrealized losses of
$0.4 million (December 31, 2009
$13.1 million).
Other-than-temporary
impairments. The Company recorded
other-than-temporary
impairments for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010 of $Nil (2009
$1.8 million) and $0.3 million (2009
$19.9 million), respectively. We review all of our
investments in fixed maturities designated available for sale
for potential impairment each quarter based on criteria
including issuer-specific circumstances, credit ratings actions
and general macro-economic conditions. The process of
determining
21
whether a decline in value is
other-than-temporary
requires considerable judgment. As part of the assessment
process we evaluate whether it is more likely than not that we
will sell any fixed maturity security in an unrealized loss
position before its market value recovers to amortized cost.
Once a security has been identified as
other-than-temporarily
impaired, the amount of any impairment included in net income is
determined by reference to that portion of the unrealized loss
that is considered to be credit related. Non-credit related
unrealized losses are included in other comprehensive income.
U.S. Government and Agency
Securities. U.S. government and agency
securities are composed of bonds issued by the
U.S. Treasury, Government National Mortgage Association
(GNMA) and government-sponsored enterprises such as
Federal National Mortgage Association, Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corporation, Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Farm
Credit Bank.
Corporate Securities. Corporate securities are
composed of short-term, medium-term and long-term debt issued by
corporations and supra-national securities.
Foreign Government. Foreign government
securities are composed of bonds issued and guaranteed by
foreign governments such as the U.K., Canada, and France.
Municipals. Municipal securities are composed
of bonds issued by U.S. municipalities.
Asset-Backed Securities. Asset-backed
securities are securities backed by notes or receivables against
assets other than real estate.
Mortgage-Backed Securities. Mortgage-backed
securities are securities that represent ownership in a pool of
mortgages. Both principal and income are backed by the group of
mortgages in the pool.
Short-Term Investments. Short-term investments
comprise highly liquid debt securities with a maturity greater
than three months but less than one year from the date of
purchase and are held as part of the investment portfolio of the
Company. Short-term investments are classified as either trading
or available-for-sale according to the facts and circumstances
of the investment held, and carried at estimated fair value.
Other Investments. On May 19, 2009, Aspen
Holdings invested $25.0 million in Cartesian Iris 2009A
L.P. through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Acorn Limited.
Cartesian Iris 2009A L.P. is a Delaware Limited Partnership
formed to provide capital to Iris Re, a Class 3 Bermudian
reinsurer focusing on insurance-linked securities. On
June 1, 2010, the investment in Cartesian Iris 2009A L.P.
matured and was reinvested in the Cartesian Iris Offshore
Fund L.P. The Companys involvement with Cartesian
Iris Offshore Fund L.P. is limited to its investment in the
fund, and it is not committed to making further investments in
Cartesian Iris Offshore Fund L.P.; accordingly, the
carrying value of the investment represents the Companys
maximum exposure to a loss as a result of its involvement with
the partnership at each balance sheet date.
In addition to returns on our investment, we provide services on
risk selection, pricing and portfolio design in return for a
percentage of profits from Iris Re. In the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2010, fees of $Nil and
$0.2 million, respectively, were payable to us.
The Company has determined that Cartesian Iris Offshore Fund
L.P. has the characteristics of a variable interest entity that
are addressed by the guidance in ASC 810,
Consolidation. Cartesian Iris Offshore Fund L.P. is not
consolidated by the Company. The Company has no decision-making
power, those powers having been reserved for the general
partner. The arrangement with Cartesian Iris Offshore Fund L.P.
is simply that of an investee to which the Company provides
additional services.
The Company accounts/accounted for its investments in Cartesian
Iris 2009A L.P. and Cartesian Offshore Fund L.P. in accordance
with the equity method of accounting. Adjustments to the
carrying value of this investment are made based on our share of
capital including our share of income and expenses, which is
provided in the quarterly management accounts of the
partnership. The adjusted carrying value approximates fair
value. In the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010, our share of gains and losses increased the value of our
investment by $0.9 million (2009 reduction of
$0.3 million) and $1.4 million (2009
reduction of $0.3 million), respectively. The increase in
value has been recognized in realized and unrealized gains and
losses in the condensed consolidated statement of operations.
22
Investment Purchases and Sales. The following
table sets out an analysis of investment purchases/(sales) and
maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Purchase of fixed maturity investments
|
|
$
|
776.7
|
|
|
$
|
691.6
|
|
|
$
|
1,883.2
|
|
|
$
|
2,064.7
|
|
(Proceeds) from sales and maturities of fixed maturity
investments
|
|
|
(693.7
|
)
|
|
|
(563.8
|
)
|
|
|
(1,709.3
|
)
|
|
|
(1,536.6
|
)
|
Net purchases/(proceeds) from other investments sold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(277.2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(412.2
|
)
|
Net (sales)/purchases of short-term investments
|
|
|
(19.3
|
)
|
|
|
125.1
|
|
|
|
(78.5
|
)
|
|
|
217.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (sales)/purchases
|
|
$
|
63.7
|
|
|
$
|
(24.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
95.4
|
|
|
$
|
332.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Income. The following is a summary
of investment income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Fixed maturity investments
Available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
54.1
|
|
|
$
|
56.4
|
|
|
$
|
163.7
|
|
|
$
|
158.5
|
|
Fixed maturity investments Trading portfolio
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
13.3
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Short-term investments
Available-for-sale
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Short-term investments Trading portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
Fixed term deposits (included in cash and cash equivalents)
|
|
|
0.7
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
Other investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
59.8
|
|
|
$
|
60.0
|
|
|
$
|
180.2
|
|
|
$
|
194.7
|
|
Investments expenses
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
58.1
|
|
|
$
|
58.9
|
|
|
$
|
175.0
|
|
|
$
|
190.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
The following table summarizes the pre-tax realized investment
gains and losses, and the change in unrealized gains and losses
on investments recorded in shareholders equity and in
comprehensive income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Pre-tax realized and unrealized investment gains and losses
included in income statement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
short-term investments and fixed maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized gains
|
|
$
|
8.5
|
|
|
$
|
11.4
|
|
|
$
|
21.1
|
|
|
$
|
28.3
|
|
Gross realized (losses)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(12.2
|
)
|
Trading portfolio short-term investments and fixed maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized gains
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
Gross realized (losses)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
Net change in gross unrealized gains
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
Impairments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
other-than-temporary
impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(19.9
|
)
|
Equity accounted investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized gains in Cartesian Iris
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pre-tax realized and unrealized investment gains and
losses included in income statement:
|
|
$
|
22.1
|
|
|
$
|
14.6
|
|
|
$
|
40.1
|
|
|
$
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
available-for-sale
unrealized gains:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities
|
|
|
68.2
|
|
|
|
106.3
|
|
|
|
175.9
|
|
|
|
151.3
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total change in pre-tax
available-for-sale
unrealized gains
|
|
|
68.2
|
|
|
|
115.0
|
|
|
|
175.9
|
|
|
|
166.9
|
|
Change in taxes
|
|
|
(6.7
|
)
|
|
|
(24.3
|
)
|
|
|
(14.5
|
)
|
|
|
(37.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total change in unrealized gains, net of taxes
|
|
$
|
61.5
|
|
|
$
|
90.7
|
|
|
$
|
161.4
|
|
|
$
|
129.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
7.
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
Fair Value Methodology. Our estimates of fair
value for financial assets and liabilities are based on the
framework established in the fair value accounting guidance. The
framework prioritizes the inputs, which refer broadly to
assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or
liability, into three levels, which are described in more detail
below.
We consider prices for actively traded Treasury
(U.S. Government and Foreign Government) securities to be
derived based on quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets, which are Level 1 inputs in the fair value
hierarchy. We consider prices for other securities priced via
vendors, indices, or broker-dealers to be derived based on
inputs that are observable for the asset, either directly or
indirectly, which are Level 2 inputs in the fair value
hierarchy.
We consider securities, other financial instruments and
derivative insurance contracts subject to fair value measurement
whose valuation is derived by internal valuation models to be
based largely on unobservable inputs, which are Level 3
inputs in the fair value hierarchy. There have been no changes
in our use of valuation techniques during the year.
Our fixed income securities are traded on the
over-the-counter
market, based on prices provided by one or more market makers in
each security. Securities such as U.S. Government,
U.S. Agency, Foreign Government and investment grade
corporate bonds have multiple market makers in addition to
readily observable market value indicators such as expected
credit spread, except for Treasury securities, over the yield
curve. We use a variety of pricing sources to value our fixed
income securities including those securities that have pay
down/prepay features such as mortgage-backed securities and
asset-backed securities in order to ensure fair and accurate
pricing. The fair value estimates of the investment grade
securities in our portfolio do not use significant unobservable
inputs or modeling techniques.
The following table presents our investments within the fair
value hierarchy at which the Companys financial assets are
measured on a recurring basis at September 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Fixed income maturities
available-for-sale,
at fair value
|
|
$
|
1,272.3
|
|
|
$
|
4,265.4
|
|
|
$
|
15.3
|
|
Short-term investments
available-for-sale,
at fair value
|
|
|
179.0
|
|
|
|
118.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income maturities, trading at fair value
|
|
|
47.0
|
|
|
|
363.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments, trading at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,498.3
|
|
|
$
|
4,749.3
|
|
|
$
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the second quarter, we transferred $109.6 million of
foreign government agency securities from Level 1 to
Level 2 to bring our classification in line with the
presentation for other government agency securities. No other
transfers have occurred during the year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Fixed income maturities
available-for-sale,
at fair value
|
|
$
|
1,029.8
|
|
|
$
|
4,205.2
|
|
|
$
|
14.9
|
|
Short-term investments
available-for-sale,
at fair value
|
|
|
293.1
|
|
|
|
75.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income maturities, trading at fair value
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
336.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments, trading at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,334.5
|
|
|
$
|
4,620.3
|
|
|
$
|
21.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income maturities classified as Level 3 include
holdings where there are significant unobservable inputs in
determining the assets fair value and also securities of
Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. (Lehman Brothers).
Although the market value of Lehman Brothers bonds was based on
25
broker dealer quoted prices, management believes that the
valuation is based, in part, on market expectations of future
recoveries out of bankruptcy proceedings, which involve
significant unobservable inputs to the valuation. Derivatives at
fair value consist of the credit insurance contract and foreign
exchange contracts as described in Note 9.
The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning
and ending balances for all assets measured at fair value on a
recurring basis using Level 3 inputs for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Fixed Maturity
|
|
|
Derivatives at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Level 3 assets as of July 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
14.7
|
|
|
$
|
3.1
|
|
|
$
|
17.8
|
|
Total unrealized gains or (losses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in comprehensive income
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
Included in earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 assets as of September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
15.3
|
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Fixed Maturity
|
|
|
Derivatives at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Level 3 assets as of January 1, 2010
|
|
$
|
14.9
|
|
|
$
|
6.7
|
|
|
$
|
21.6
|
|
Total unrealized gains or (losses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in comprehensive income
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
Included in earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 assets as of September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
15.3
|
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
16.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning
and ending balances for all assets measured at fair value on a
recurring basis using Level 3 inputs for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Fixed Maturity
|
|
|
Derivatives at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Level 3 assets as of July 1, 2009
|
|
$
|
18.3
|
|
|
$
|
5.4
|
|
|
$
|
23.7
|
|
Total unrealized gains or (losses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
Included in comprehensive income
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 assets as of September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
14.0
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
17.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
Fixed Maturity
|
|
|
Derivatives at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Level 3 assets as of January 1, 2009
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
$
|
11.8
|
|
|
$
|
14.6
|
|
Securities transferred in/(out) of Level 3
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
|
Total unrealized gains or (losses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)
|
Included in comprehensive income
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5.8
|
)
|
Settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 assets as of September 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
14.0
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
17.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents our liabilities within the fair
value hierarchy at which the Companys financial
liabilities are measured on a recurring basis at
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Liabilities under derivative contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit insurance contract
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3.7
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities under derivative contracts as of September 30,
2010
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
|
$
|
3.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Liabilities under derivative contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit insurance contract
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning
and ending balances for the liabilities under derivative
contracts measured at fair value on a recurring basis using
Level 3 inputs during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Beginning Balance
|
|
$
|
5.6
|
|
|
$
|
9.2
|
|
Total realized losses/(gains) included in earnings
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(4.3
|
)
|
|
|
(7.8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance
|
|
$
|
3.7
|
|
|
$
|
3.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning
and ending balances for the liabilities under derivative
contracts measured at fair value on a recurring basis using
Level 3 inputs during the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Beginning Balance
|
|
$
|
7.7
|
|
|
$
|
11.1
|
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance
|
|
$
|
6.0
|
|
|
$
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
We purchase retrocession and reinsurance to limit and diversify
our own risk exposure and to increase our own insurance
underwriting capacity. These agreements provide for recovery of
a portion of losses and loss expenses from reinsurers. As is the
case with most reinsurance treaties, we remain liable to the
extent that reinsurers do not meet their obligations under these
agreements, and therefore, in line with our risk management
objectives, we evaluate the financial condition of our
reinsurers and monitor concentrations of credit risk.
Balances pertaining to reinsurance transactions are reported
gross on the consolidated balance sheet, meaning
that reinsurance recoverables on unpaid losses and ceded
unearned premiums are not deducted from insurance reserves but
are recorded as assets.
The largest concentrations of reinsurance recoverables as at
September 30, 2010, were with Lloyds on Lloyds
syndicates which are all rated A (Excellent) by A.M. Best
and A+ (Strong) by S&P and with Munich Re which is rated A+
(Superior) by A.M. Best and AA- (Very Strong) by S&P,
for their financial strength. Balances with Lloyds and
Munich Re represented 29.5% and 12.2%, respectively, of
reinsurance recoverables.
The following tables summarize information on the location and
amounts of derivative fair values on the consolidated balance
sheet as at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2010:
As at September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Not
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Designated as
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives
|
|
Liability Derivatives
|
Hedging Instruments
|
|
Notional
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
Under ASC 815
|
|
Amount
|
|
Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Credit insurance contract
|
|
$
|
452.0
|
|
|
Derivatives at fair value
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
Liabilities under derivatives
|
|
$
|
3.7
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
105.0
|
|
|
Derivatives at fair value
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
Liabilities under derivatives
|
|
$
|
0.1
|
|
As at December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Not
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Designated as
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives
|
|
Liability Derivatives
|
Hedging Instruments
|
|
Notional
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
Under ASC 815
|
|
Amount
|
|
Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Credit insurance contract
|
|
$
|
452.4
|
|
|
Derivatives at fair value
|
|
$
|
6.7
|
|
|
Liabilities under derivatives
|
|
$
|
9.2
|
|
28
The following table provides the unrealized and realized
gains/(losses) recorded in earnings for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain/(Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
Derivatives Not Designated as
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
Hedging Instruments Under ASC 815
|
|
Location of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
($ millions)
|
|
Credit Insurance Contract
|
|
Change in Fair Value of Derivatives
|
|
$
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.0
|
)
|
Interest Rate Swap
|
|
Change in Fair Value of Derivatives
|
|
$
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain/(Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
Derivatives Not Designated as
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
Hedging Instruments Under ASC 815
|
|
Location of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Income
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
($ millions)
|
|
Credit Insurance Contract
|
|
Change in Fair Value of Derivatives
|
|
$
|
(5.7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5.9
|
)
|
Interest Rate Swap
|
|
Change in Fair Value of Derivatives
|
|
$
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Foreign Exchange Contract
|
|
Net Foreign Exchange Gains and Losses
|
|
$
|
1.2
|
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
Credit insurance contract. On
November 28, 2006, the Company entered into a credit
insurance contract which, subject to its terms, insures the
Company against losses due to the inability of one or more of
our reinsurance counterparties to meet their financial
obligations to the Company.
The Company considers the contract to be a derivative instrument
because the final settlement is expected to take place two years
after expiry of cover and include an amount attributable to
outstanding and IBNR claims which may not at that point in time
be due and payable to the Company.
As a result of the application of derivative accounting
guidance, the contract is treated as an asset or a liability and
measured at the directors estimate of its fair value.
Changes in the estimated fair value from time to time will be
included in the consolidated statement of operations.
The contract is for a maximum of five years and provides 90%
cover for a named panel of reinsurers up to individual defined
sub-limits.
The contract does allow, subject to certain conditions, for
substitution and replacement of panel members if the
Companys panel of reinsurers changes. Payments are made on
a quarterly basis throughout the period of the contract based on
the aggregate limit, which was set initially at
$477 million but is subject to adjustment. The carrying
value of the derivative is the Companys maximum exposure
to loss.
On October 26, 2010, we gave notice of our intention to
cancel our credit insurance contract with effect from
November 28, 2010. The notice of cancellation will trigger
a final payment of $1.9 million to the contract
counter-parties.
Foreign exchange contract. The Company uses
forward exchange contracts to manage foreign currency risk. A
forward foreign currency exchange contract involves an
obligation to purchase or sell a specified currency at a future
date at a price set at the time of the contract. Foreign
currency exchange contracts will not eliminate fluctuations in
the value of our assets and liabilities denominated in foreign
currencies but rather allow us to establish a rate of exchange
for a future point in time. The foreign currency contracts are
recorded as derivatives at fair value with changes recorded as a
net foreign exchange gain or loss in the Companys
statement of operations. As at September 30, 2010, the
Company had no forward contracts outstanding.
Interest rate swaps. The Company selectively
hedges its exposure in its investment portfolio to interest
rates by entering into interest rate swaps with financial
institution counterparties in the ordinary course of its
investment activities. As at September 30, 2010, the
Company held a number of standard fixed for floating interest
rate swaps with a total notional amount of $105.0 million
that are due to mature between August 2, 2012 and
August 2, 2020. As at September 30, 2010, there was a
charge in respect of the interest rate swaps for the quarter and
the year of $2.0 million (2009 $Nil) and
$2.1 million (2009 $Nil), respectively.
29
|
|
10.
|
Reserves
for Losses and Adjustment Expenses
|
The following table represents a reconciliation of beginning and
ending consolidated loss and loss adjustment expenses
(LAE) reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at
|
|
|
As at
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Provision for losses and LAE at start of year
|
|
$
|
3,331.1
|
|
|
$
|
3,070.3
|
|
Less reinsurance recoverable
|
|
|
(321.5
|
)
|
|
|
(283.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss and LAE at start of year
|
|
|
3,009.6
|
|
|
|
2,787.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss and LAE expenses disposed of
|
|
|
(43.3
|
)
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for losses and LAE for claims incurred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year
|
|
|
950.1
|
|
|
|
1,032.5
|
|
Prior years
|
|
|
(8.8
|
)
|
|
|
(84.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred
|
|
|
941.3
|
|
|
|
948.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and LAE payments for claims incurred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year
|
|
|
(51.1
|
)
|
|
|
(131.6
|
)
|
Prior years
|
|
|
(432.2
|
)
|
|
|
(677.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid
|
|
|
(483.3
|
)
|
|
|
(808.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange (gains)/losses
|
|
|
(15.9
|
)
|
|
|
93.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and LAE reserves at period end
|
|
|
3,408.4
|
|
|
|
3,009.6
|
|
Plus reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses at period end
|
|
|
263.8
|
|
|
|
321.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and LAE reserves at September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
3,672.2
|
|
|
$
|
3,331.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, there were
reserve releases of $8.8 million compared to
$71.0 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2009 in our estimate of the ultimate claims to be paid in
respect of prior accident years. For additional information on
our reserve releases please refer to the section titled
Reserves for Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses.
The $43.3 million loss reserve portfolio transfer in the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 relates to the
commutation of structured contracts.
The following table provides a summary of the Companys
authorized and issued share capital at September 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at September 30, 2010
|
|
As at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
$ in
|
|
|
|
$ in
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Thousands
|
|
Number
|
|
Thousands
|
|
Authorized Share Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares 0.15144558¢ per share
|
|
|
969,629,030
|
|
|
$
|
1,469
|
|
|
|
969,629,030
|
|
|
$
|
1,469
|
|
Non-Voting shares 0.15144558¢ per share
|
|
|
6,787,880
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
6,787,880
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Preference shares 0.15144558¢ per share
|
|
|
100,000,000
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
100,000,000
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ in
|
|
|
|
$ in
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Thousands
|
|
Number
|
|
Thousands
|
|
Issued Share Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued ordinary shares of 0.15144558¢ per share
|
|
|
76,642,007
|
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
|
83,327,594
|
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
Issued preference shares of 0.15144558¢ each with a
liquidation preference of $50 per share
|
|
|
4,600,000
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
4,600,000
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Issued preference shares of 0.15144558¢ each with a
liquidation preference of $25 per share
|
|
|
5,327,500
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
5,327,500
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total issued share capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
$ in millions
|
|
|
$ in millions
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
$
|
1,561.5
|
|
|
$
|
1,763.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary Shares. The following table
summarizes transactions in our ordinary shares during the nine
month period ended September 30, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Shares in issue at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
83,327,594
|
|
Share transactions in the nine months ended
September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued to the Names trust upon exercise of investor
options (refer to Note 12)
|
|
|
5,819
|
|
Shares issued to employees under the share incentive plan
|
|
|
760,098
|
|
Shares issued to non-employee directors
|
|
|
49,970
|
|
Repurchase of ordinary shares from shareholders
|
|
|
(7,501,474
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares in issue at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
76,642,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary Share Repurchase. On June 23,
2010, an agreement was signed to repurchase 10,835 shares
from the Names Trustee. The shares were repurchased on
July 7, 2010 and subsequently cancelled.
On February 9, 2010, our Board of Directors authorized a
new repurchase program for up to $400 million of our
ordinary shares. The authorization for the repurchase program
covers the period to March 1, 2012. This share repurchase
program was in addition to the completed accelerated share
repurchase program entered into on January 5, 2010. On
September 22, 2010, we initiated an open market purchase
program to purchase ordinary shares in the open market. During
the third quarter of 2010, we repurchased in the open market and
subsequently cancelled a total of 264,555 ordinary shares under
the repurchase program.
On January 5, 2010, we entered into an accelerated share
repurchase program with Goldman Sachs & Co.
(Goldman Sachs) to repurchase $200 million of
our ordinary shares. The transaction was completed on
May 26, 2010, when a total of 7,226,084 ordinary shares
were received and cancelled. The repurchase completes the share
repurchase program authorized by our Board of Directors and
announced on February 6, 2008. The purchase was funded with
cash available and the sale of investment assets.
The Company has issued options and other equity incentives under
four arrangements: investor options, employee awards,
non-employee director awards and the employee share purchase
plans. When options are exercised or other equity awards have
vested, new shares are issued as the Company does not currently
hold treasury shares. The Company applies a fair value based
measurement method and an estimate of future forfeitures in the
calculation of the compensation costs of stock options and
restricted share units.
Investor Options. The investor options were
issued on June 21, 2002 to Wellington Investment Holdings
(Jersey) Limited (Wellington Investment) and members
of Syndicate 2020 who were not
31
corporate members of Syndicate 2020. The options conferred to
the members of Syndicate 2020 are held for their benefit by
Appleby Services (Bermuda) Ltd. (formerly Appleby Trust
(Bermuda) Limited) (Names Trustee). The
subscription price payable under the options is initially
£10 and increases by 5% per annum, less any dividends paid.
Option holders are not entitled to participate in any dividends
prior to exercise and would not rank as a creditor in the event
of liquidation. If not exercised, the options will expire on
June 21, 2012. During the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010, the Names Trustee exercised 9,549
and 24,560 options on a cash and cashless basis, respectively
(2009 627 and 4,469 options, respectively).
Employee and Non-Executive Director
Awards. Employee options and other awards are
granted under the Aspen 2003 Share Incentive Plan and
non-executive director awards are granted under the 2006 Stock
Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors.
Stock options are granted with an exercise price equivalent to
the fair value of the share on the grant date. The weighted
average value at grant date is determined using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model. Stock options typically vest
over a three-year period with a ten-year contract period (except
for options granted in 2007 which have a
7-year
exercise period) with vesting dependent on time and performance
conditions established at the time of grant. No options were
granted in the three and nine months ended September 30,
2010 (2009 Nil); 215,068 options were exercised
during the three months ended September 30, 2010
(2009 106,166); and 736,879 options were exercised
during the nine months ended September 30, 2010
(2009 164,625). Compensation costs credited against
income in respect of employee options for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2010 were $Nil and
$0.5 million, respectively (2009 charges of
$0.5 million and $1.6 million, respectively).
Restricted share units (RSUs) to employees
vest equally over a two or three-year period. Some of the grants
vest at year-end, while some other grants vest on the
anniversary of the date of grant or when the Compensation
Committee of the Board agrees to deliver them. The fair value of
the restricted share units is based on the closing price on the
date of the grant. The fair value is expensed through the income
statement evenly over the vesting period. During the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company granted
to employees 45,134 and 153,589 restricted share units,
respectively (2009 Nil and 42,291). In the case of
non-employee directors, one-twelfth of the RSUs vest on
each one month anniversary of the date of grant, with 100% of
the RSUs becoming vested on the first anniversary of the
date of grant. On February 9, 2010 (with a grant date of
February 11, 2010), the Board of Directors approved a total
of 28,640 RSUs for the non-employee directors
(April 29, 2009 Nil) and 17,902 RSUs to
the Chairman (April 29, 2009 8,439).
Compensation costs charged against income in respect of
restricted share units for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010 were $1.0 million and
$2.6 million, respectively (2009
$0.7 million and $2.1 million).
The fair value of performance share awards is based on the value
of the average of the high and low of the share price on the
date of the grant less a deduction for expected dividends which
would not accrue during the vesting period. Performance shares
vest over a three or four-year period with shares eligible for
vesting dependent on the achievement of performance targets at
the end of specified periods as established at the time of
grant. Compensation costs charged against income in the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2010 in respect of
performance shares were a charge of $2.7 million and a
charge of $5.0 million, respectively (2009
$5.5 million and $11.9 million).
On February 8, 2010, the Compensation Committee approved
the grant of 720,098 performance shares with a grant date of
February 11, 2010. The performance shares will be subject
to a three-year vesting period with a separate annual Return on
Equity (ROE) test for each year. One-third of the
grant will be eligible for vesting each year based on the
following formula, and will only be issuable at the end of the
three-year period. If the ROE achieved in any given year is less
than 7%, then the portion of the performance shares subject to
the vesting conditions in such year will be forfeited (i.e.,
33.33% of the initial grant). If the ROE achieved in any given
year is between 7% and 12%, then the percentage of the
performance shares eligible for vesting in such year will be
between 10% and 100% on a straight-line basis. If the ROE
achieved in any given year is between 12% and 22%, then the
percentage of the performance shares eligible for vesting in
such year will be between 100% and 200% on a straight-line
32
basis. Notwithstanding the vesting criteria for each given year,
if in any given year, the shares eligible for vesting are
greater than 100% for the portion of such years grant
(i.e., the ROE was greater than 12% in such year) and the
average ROE over such year and the preceding year is less than
7%, then only 100% (and no more) of the shares that are eligible
for vesting in such year shall vest. If the average ROE over the
two years is greater than 7%, then there will be no diminution
in vesting and the shares eligible for vesting in such year will
vest in accordance with the vesting schedule without regard to
the average ROE over the two-year period.
Employee Share Purchase Plans. On
April 30, 2008, the shareholders of the Company approved
the Employee Share Purchase Plan (the ESPP), the
2008 Sharesave Scheme and the International Employee Share
Purchase Plan, which are implemented by a series of consecutive
offering periods as determined by the Board. In respect of the
ESPP, employees can save up to $500 per month over a two-year
period, at the end of which they will be eligible to purchase
Company shares at a discounted price. In respect of the
2008 Sharesave Scheme, employees can save up to £250
per month over a three-year period, at the end of which they
will be eligible to purchase Company shares at a discounted
price. The purchase price will be eighty-five percent (85%) of
the fair market value of a share on the offering date which may
be adjusted upon changes in capitalization of the Company. Under
the plan, 1,582 shares were issued during the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2010 (2009
Nil). Compensation costs charged against income in the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2010 in respect of the ESPP
were $0.1 million and $0.5 million, respectively
(2009 $Nil and $Nil).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade Mark
|
|
|
Licenses
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Trade Mark
|
|
|
Licenses
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
$
|
11.5
|
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.2
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
|
$
|
16.6
|
|
|
$
|
3.2
|
|
|
$
|
21.4
|
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade Mark
|
|
|
Licenses
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Trade Mark
|
|
|
Licenses
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Intangible Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the period
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
11.8
|
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.2
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the period
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
|
$
|
16.6
|
|
|
$
|
3.2
|
|
|
$
|
21.4
|
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On January 22, 2010, we entered into a sale and purchase
agreement to purchase APJ Continuation Limited and its
subsidiaries (APJ) for an aggregate consideration of
$4.8 million. We closed the transaction on March 22,
2010. The business writes a specialist account of K&R
insurance which complements our existing political and financial
risk line of business. The directors of Aspen Holdings have
assessed the fair value of the net tangible and financial assets
acquired at $1.2 million. The $3.6 million intangible
asset represents our assessment of the value of renewal rights,
distribution channels and employees associated with the business.
On February 4, 2010, we entered into a stock purchase
agreement to purchase a U.S. insurance company with
licenses to write insurance business on an admitted basis in the
U.S. The value of these licenses was $10.0 million. We
closed the transaction on August 16, 2010.
33
|
|
14.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
We are obliged by the terms of our contractual obligations to
U.S. policyholders and by undertakings to certain
regulatory authorities to facilitate the issue of letters of
credit or maintain certain balances in trust funds for the
benefit of policyholders.
The following table shows the forms of collateral or other
security provided to policyholders as at September 30, 2010
and December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at September 30,
|
|
|
As at December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
($ in millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
Assets held in multi-beneficiary trusts
|
|
$
|
1,753.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,495.8
|
|
Assets held in single-beneficiary trusts
|
|
|
58.6
|
|
|
|
55.7
|
|
Secured letters of credit(1)
|
|
|
504.2
|
|
|
|
528.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,316.5
|
|
|
$
|
2,079.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total as % of cash and invested assets
|
|
|
32.1
|
%
|
|
|
30.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
As of September 30, 2010, the
Company had funds on deposit of $703.7 million and
£19.2 million (December 31, 2009
$667.1 million and £18.8 million) as collateral
for the secured letters of credit.
|
On April 29, 2009, Aspen Bermuda replaced its existing
letter of credit facility with Citibank Europe dated
October 29, 2008 in a maximum aggregate amount of up to
$450 million with a new letter of credit facility in a
maximum aggregate amount of up to $550 million. The Company
had $361.7 million of outstanding collateralized letter of
credit under this facility at September 30, 2010.
On October 6, 2009, Aspen U.K. and Aspen Bermuda entered
into a $200 million secured letter of credit facility with
Barclays Bank plc. All letters of credit issued under the
facility are used to support reinsurance obligations of the
parties to the agreement and their respective subsidiaries. The
Company had $46.0 million of outstanding collateralized
letters of credit under this facility at September 30, 2010.
On July 31, 2010, Aspen Holdings and its various
subsidiaries replaced its then existing $450 million
revolving credit facility with a three year $280 million
revolving credit facility.
Funds at Lloyds. AUL operates in
Lloyds as the corporate member for Syndicate 4711.
Lloyds determines Syndicate 4711s required
regulatory capital principally based on the syndicates
annual business plan. Such capital, called Funds at
Lloyds, comprises: cash, investments and a fully
collateralized letter of credit. The amounts of cash,
investments and letter of credit at September 30, 2010
amount to $220.1 million (December 31,
2009 $219.8 million).
Amounts outstanding under operating leases net of subleases as
of September 30, 2010 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Later
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
Years
|
|
Total
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Operating Lease Obligations
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
19.4
|
|
|
|
45.1
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
Variable
interest entities
|
Cartesian Iris 2009A L.P and Cartesian Iris Offshore Fund
L.P. As disclosed in Note 6, on May 19,
2009, Aspen Holdings invested $25.0 million in Cartesian
Iris 2009A L.P. through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Acorn
Limited. Cartesian Iris 2009A L.P. is a Delaware Limited
Partnership formed to provide capital to Iris Re, a Class 3
Bermudian reinsurer focusing on insurance-linked securities. On
June 1, 2010, the investment in Cartesian Iris 2009A L.P.
matured and was reinvested in the Cartesian Iris Offshore
Fund L.P. The Companys involvement with Cartesian
Iris Offshore Fund L.P. is limited to its investment in the
fund, and it is not committed to making further investments in
Cartesian Iris Offshore Fund L.P.; accordingly, the
carrying value of the investment represents the Companys
34
maximum exposure to a loss as a result of its involvement with
the partnership at each balance sheet date.
In addition to returns on our investment, we provide services on
risk selection, pricing and portfolio design in return for a
percentage of profits from Iris Re. In the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2010, fees of $Nil and
$0.2 million, respectively, were payable to us.
The Company has determined that Cartesian Iris Offshore Fund
L.P. has the characteristics of a variable interest entity that
are addressed by the guidance in ASC 810,
Consolidation. Cartesian Iris Offshore Fund L.P. is not
consolidated by the Company. The Company has no decision-making
power, those powers having been reserved for the general
partner. The arrangement with Cartesian Iris Offshore Fund L.P.
is simply that of an investee to which the Company provides
additional services.
35
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
The following is a discussion and analysis of our financial
condition and results of operations for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. This discussion
and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes
contained in this
Form 10-Q
and the audited consolidated financial statements and related
notes for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, as well
as the discussions of critical accounting policies, contained in
our Financial Statements in our 2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
Some of the information contained in this discussion and
analysis or set forth elsewhere in this
Form 10-Q,
including information with respect to our plans and strategy for
our business and in Outlook and Trends below,
includes forward-looking statements that involve risk and
uncertainties. Please see the section captioned Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements in this
report and the Risk Factors in Item 1A of our
2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for more information on factors that could cause actual results
to differ materially from the results described in or implied by
any forward-looking statements contained in this discussion and
analysis.
Recent
Developments
On October 5, 2010, we announced the appointment of John
Cavoores as co-chief executive officer of our insurance
operations, Aspen Insurance. Mr. Cavoores has been a member
of our Board of Directors since 2006 and will be sharing
executive oversight of Aspen Insurance with co-chief executive
officer Rupert Villers. Mr. Cavoores has a particular focus
on Aspen Insurances casualty and professional lines
business while Mr. Villers concentrates on transportation
related lines and financial lines with joint responsibility for
property business. Geographically, Mr. Cavoores has
executive oversight over Aspen Insurances
U.S. platform, while Mr. Villers is responsibly for
non-U.S. operations.
Effective October 8, 2010, we entered into five interest
rate swaps with a notional amount of $100.0 million due to
mature between October 8, 2012 and October 8, 2020.
The swaps are part of the Companys ordinary course of
investment activities to hedge its exposure to interest rates.
On October 26, 2010 we gave notice of our intention to
cancel our credit insurance contract with effect from
November 28, 2010. The notice of cancellation will trigger
a final payment of $1.9 million to the contract
counter-parties.
On October 29, 2010, we received regulatory approval to
establish a branch in Zurich, Switzerland to write insurance
business (in addition to our currently existing branch which
writes reinsurance business).
On November 4, 2010, the Company announced the appointment
of Mr. Albert J. Beer to the board of directors in a
non-executive capacity with effect from February 1, 2011.
Mr. Beer has also been appointed to the Companys Risk
Committee and the Audit Committee, where he will serve as an
additional financial expert.
Effective November 9, 2010, we entered into five interest
rate swaps with a notional amount of $100.0 million due to
mature between November 9, 2012 and November 9, 2020.
The swaps are part of the Companys ordinary course of
investment activities to hedge its exposure to interest rates.
This brings the Companys total notional value of interest
rate swaps to $305.0 million, maturing between
August 2, 2012 and November 9, 2020.
Overview
We are a Bermuda holding company. We write insurance and
reinsurance business through our wholly-owned subsidiaries in
three major jurisdictions: Aspen U.K. and AUL, corporate member
of Syndicate 4711 at Lloyds of London (United Kingdom),
Aspen Bermuda (Bermuda), Aspen Specialty and Aspen America
Insurance Company(United States). Aspen U.K. also has branches
in Paris, France; Zurich, Switzerland; Dublin, Ireland; Cologne,
Germany; Singapore; Australia; and Canada. We operate in global
markets for property and casualty insurance and reinsurance.
36
The most significant features of our results for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2010 were:
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted book value per share of $38.22, up 15.3% over the end of
the third quarter of 2009 and up 3.4% from the end of the second
quarter in 2010;
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share of $1.08 for the quarter, down from
$1.63 for the third quarter of 2009;
|
|
|
|
Third quarter net income after tax of $92.8 million, down
from $145.8 million in the same quarter last year due to
the combination of large losses and relative prior year reserve
movement;
|
|
|
|
Completed the accelerated share repurchase transaction on
May 21, 2010, resulting in the repurchase and cancellation
of 7,226,084 shares during the first half of 2010; and
|
|
|
|
An increase of $68.3 million and $176.0 million in
unrealized gains in the available for sale investment portfolio
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.
|
Diluted book value per ordinary share is based on total
shareholders equity less preference shares (liquidation
preference less issue expenses), divided by the number of
diluted ordinary shares at the end of the period.
Shareholders equity and ordinary shares in issue as at
September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at
|
|
|
As at
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
($ in millions, except for share amounts)
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,440.7
|
|
|
$
|
3,212.1
|
|
Preference shares less issue expenses
|
|
|
(353.6
|
)
|
|
|
(353.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets attributable to ordinary shareholders
|
|
$
|
3,087.1
|
|
|
$
|
2,858.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares
|
|
|
76,642,007
|
|
|
|
83,094,615
|
|
Diluted ordinary shares
|
|
|
80,808,977
|
|
|
|
86,192,623
|
|
The following overview of our results for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 and of our financial condition
at September 30, 2010, is intended to identify important
trends and should be read in conjunction with the more detailed
discussion further below.
Gross written premiums. Total gross written
premiums decreased to $415.8 million in the third quarter
of 2010 when compared to 2009 with reductions in both the
insurance and reinsurance segments but more significantly in
reinsurance where we wrote more property reinsurance business in
the first half of the year, and in our specialty and casualty
divisions due to reductions in business written as a result of
market conditions. The table below shows our gross written
premiums for each segment for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, and the percentage change in
gross written premiums for each segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
Business Segment
|
|
Ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
% increase/
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
$
|
236.0
|
|
|
|
(20.3
|
)%
|
|
$
|
296.1
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
179.8
|
|
|
|
(7.4
|
)%
|
|
|
194.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
415.8
|
|
|
|
(15.2
|
)%
|
|
$
|
490.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross written premiums in the insurance segment have decreased
by 7.4% to $179.8 million when compared to the third
quarter of 2009 with the reduction due predominantly to our
decision to write less casualty insurance business in the
current difficult trading environment.
Reinsurance. Total reinsurance ceded for the
quarter of $38.8 million has increased by
$10.6 million from the third quarter of 2009 mainly in the
insurance segment and specifically reinsurance for our new U.S
professional lines business and reinstatement costs in our
marine, energy and transportation division.
37
Loss ratio. We monitor the ratio of losses and
loss adjustment expenses to net earned premium (the loss
ratio) as a measure of relative underwriting performance
where a lower ratio represents a better result than a higher
ratio. The loss ratios for our two business segments for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
Business Segment
|
|
Ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
53.6
|
%
|
|
|
44.1
|
%
|
Insurance
|
|
|
77.3
|
%
|
|
|
59.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loss Ratio
|
|
|
63.3
|
%
|
|
|
49.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The loss ratio for the quarter of 63.3% has increased by
13.4 percentage points compared to the third quarter of
2009. The increase is due mainly to $6.2 million of prior
year reserve strengthening in the current quarter compared with
$44.2 million of reserve releases in the third quarter of
2009. Reserve releases in our reinsurance segment reduced from
$33.2 million in the third quarter of 2009 to
$3.3 million in the current period. The $29.9 million
change in reserve releases in this segment from the prior year
is equivalent to an 11.2 percentage point reduction in the
current year loss ratio. The insurance segment had a
$9.5 million reserve strengthening this quarter compared to
an $11.0 million release in the third quarter of 2009. The
$20.5 million variance is equivalent to an
11.1 percentage points increase in the insurance segment
loss ratio for the third quarter of 2010.
We have presented loss ratios excluding the impact from prior
year reserve adjustments and catastrophic losses to aid in the
analysis of the underlying performance of our segments. We have
defined catastrophic losses as losses associated with the
Chilean earthquake in the first quarter of 2010 and the New
Zealand earthquake in the third quarter of 2010. Our current pre
tax estimate of loss for these events is $125.3 million for
the Chilean earthquake and $20.4 million for the New
Zealand earthquake. The underlying changes in accident year loss
ratios by segment are also shown in the table below. The prior
year claims adjustment in the table below reflects prior- year
reserve movement and excludes premium adjustments. The current
year claims adjustments represent catastrophic loss events.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accident Year Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio Excluding
|
|
|
|
|
Prior Year
|
|
Current Year
|
|
Prior and
|
|
|
Total Loss
|
|
Claims
|
|
Claims
|
|
Current Year
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
Claims Adjustments
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
53.6
|
%
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
(7.6
|
)%
|
|
|
47.2
|
%
|
Insurance
|
|
|
77.3
|
%
|
|
|
(5.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
72.1
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
63.3
|
%
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
(4.5
|
)%
|
|
|
57.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accident Year Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio Excluding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
Prior and
|
|
|
|
|
Prior Year
|
|
Year
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Total Loss
|
|
Claims
|
|
Claims
|
|
Year Claims
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
44.1
|
%
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
55.6
|
%
|
Insurance
|
|
|
59.2
|
%
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
65.2
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
49.9
|
%
|
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
59.3
|
%
|
Reserve releases. The loss ratios take into
account changes in our assessments of reserves for unpaid claims
and loss adjustment expenses arising from earlier years. In the
three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, we recorded
a reduction in the level of reserves for prior years. The
amounts of these reductions and their effect on the loss ratio
in each period are shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
Ended September 30, 2010
|
|
Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
Reserve (strengthening)/releases ($ in millions)
|
|
$
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
44.2
|
|
% of net premiums earned
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
38
The $50.4 million variance is mainly due to a reduction in
the size of reserve releases from the reinsurance segment
compared to the third quarter in 2009 in particular from our
other property reinsurance and casualty reinsurance divisions.
The insurance reserve strengthening in the third quarter of
2010, of $9.5 million is mainly attributable to adverse
development in our financial and professional lines while in the
third quarter of 2009 we recognized a $11.0 million reserve
release due to favorable experience across a number of lines.
Further information relating to the movement of prior year
reserves can be found below under Reserves for Loss and
Loss Adjustment Expenses.
Expense ratio. We monitor the ratio of
expenses to net earned premium (the expense ratio)
as a measure of the cost effectiveness of our policy
acquisition, operating and administrative processes. The table
below presents the contribution of the policy acquisition
expenses and operating and administrative expenses to the
expense ratio and the total expense ratios for each of the three
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Policy acquisition expenses
|
|
|
16.7
|
%
|
|
|
16.9
|
%
|
Operating and administrative expenses
|
|
|
14.4
|
%
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense ratio
|
|
|
31.1
|
%
|
|
|
30.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The policy acquisition expense ratio of 16.7% for the quarter
has reduced from 16.9% in the third quarter of 2009. The
decrease is due to a combination of reduced profit related
commissions and a change in the mix of business written where we
have written a greater proportion of business in divisions with
a lower average commission rate.
Operating and administrative expenses have increased to
$65.0 million for the quarter compared with
$63.7 million in the third quarter of 2009 with the
operating and administrative expense ratio, as a percentage of
net earned premium, increasing from 13.5% to 14.4% for the same
period. The increase in the operating and administrative expense
ratio is mainly due to lower gross earned premiums in our
reinsurance segment, while the increase in costs overall is due
to our investment in infrastructure and capabilities to support
our expansion, in the U.K., U.S., Switzerland, and Germany.
Net investment income. Net investment income
for the quarter of $58.1 million has decreased from
$58.9 million in the third quarter of 2009 due to
reductions in portfolio yields.
Change in fair value of derivatives. In the
three months ended September 30, 2010, we recorded a
reduction of $1.7 million (2009
$2.0 million reduction) in the estimated fair value of our
credit insurance contract including an interest expense credit
of $0.2 million (2009 charge of
$0.2 million) and a charge of $2.1 million
(2009 $Nil) for the interest rate swap. Further
information on these contracts can be found in Note 9 to
the financial statements.
Other revenues and expenses. Other revenues
and expenses in the three months ended September 30, 2010
included $3.4 million of foreign currency exchange gains.
Realized and unrealized gains included $8.2 million
(2009 $9.3 million) of net realized gains from
the fixed income maturities
available-for-sale
portfolio, $4.5 million (2009
$0.8 million) of net realized gains from our fixed income
maturities trading portfolio, $8.5 million
(2009 $5.2 million) of net unrealized gains
from our fixed income maturities trading portfolio, a charge of
$Nil (2009 $1.8 million) for investments we
believe to be
other-than-temporarily
impaired and $0.9 million (2009
$1.1 million) representing our share of earnings from our
investment in Cartesian Iris.
Taxes. The estimated effective rate of tax for
the quarter is 10.0% (2009 14.8%). The reduction in
the tax rate when compared to the third quarter of 2009 was due
to the relative performance of our Bermuda, U.S. and U.K.
operations. The effective tax rate for the year is subject to
revision in future periods if circumstances change and in
particular, depending on the relative claims experience of those
parts of business underwritten in Bermuda where the rate of tax
on corporate profits is zero while the U.K. corporate tax rate
is 28% and the U.S. corporate tax rate is 35%.
39
Dividends. The dividend on our ordinary shares
has been maintained at $0.15 per ordinary share for the quarter.
Dividends paid on our preference shares in the three months
ended September 30, 2010 were $5.7 million
(2009 $5.6 million).
Shareholders equity and financial
leverage. Total shareholders equity
increased by $136.8 million to $3,440.7 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2010. The most
significant movements were:
|
|
|
|
|
unrealized appreciation on investments, net of taxes, of
$61.5 million; and
|
|
|
|
net retained income after tax for the period of
$75.6 million.
|
As at September 30, 2010, total ordinary shareholders
equity was $3,087.1 million compared to
$2,951.8 million at December 31, 2009. The remainder
of our total shareholders equity, as at September 30,
2010, was funded by two classes of preference shares with a
total value as measured by their respective liquidation
preferences of $353.6 million net of share issuance costs
(December 31, 2009 $353.6 million).
The amount outstanding under our senior notes, less amortization
of expenses, of $249.7 million (December 31,
2009 $249.6 million) was the only material debt
that we had outstanding as of September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009.
Management monitors the ratio of debt to total capital, with
total capital being defined as shareholders equity plus
outstanding debt. At September 30, 2010, this ratio was
6.8% (December 31, 2009 7.0%).
Our preference shares are classified on our balance sheet as
equity but may receive a different treatment in some cases under
the capital adequacy assessments made by certain rating
agencies. Such securities are often referred to as
hybrids as they have certain attributes of both debt
and equity. We also monitor the ratio of the total of debt and
hybrids to total capital which was 16.3% as of
September 30, 2010 (December 31, 2009
17.0%)
Capital Management. On January 5, 2010,
we entered into an accelerated share repurchase program with
Goldman Sachs to repurchase $200 million of our ordinary
shares. This transaction was completed on May 26, 2010
resulting in the repurchase and cancellation of 7,226,084
ordinary shares in the first half of 2010. The repurchase
completes the share repurchase program authorized by the Board
of Directors and announced on February 6, 2008. The
purchase was funded with cash available and the sale of
investment assets.
On February 9, 2010, our Board of Directors authorized a
new repurchase program for up to $400 million of ordinary
shares. The authorization for the repurchase program covers the
period to March 1, 2012. This share repurchase program is
in addition to the accelerated share repurchase completed on
May 26, 2010. As at September 30, 2010, a total of
264,555 ordinary shares were repurchased and cancelled for a
total cost of $7.7 million.
Liquidity. Management monitors the liquidity
of Aspen Holdings and of each of its Insurance Subsidiaries.
With respect to Aspen Holdings, management monitors its ability
to service debt, to finance dividend payments and to provide
financial support to the Insurance Subsidiaries. As at
September 30, 2010, Aspen Holdings held $54.5 million
(December 31, 2009 $33.5 million) in cash
and cash equivalents which, taken together with dividends
declared or expected to be declared by subsidiary companies and
our credit facilities, management considered sufficient to
provide Aspen Holdings liquidity at such time.
As at September 30, 2010, our subsidiaries held
$848.8 million (December 31, 2009
$701.5 million) in cash and cash equivalents that are
readily realizable securities. Management monitors the value,
currency and duration of the cash and investments within its
Insurance Subsidiaries to ensure that they are able to meet
their insurance and other liabilities as they become due and was
satisfied that there was a comfortable margin of liquidity as at
September 30, 2010 and for the foreseeable future.
40
As of September 30, 2010, we had in issue
$504.2 million in letters of credit to cedants, for which
the Company had funds on deposit of $734.2 million as
collateral for the secured letters of credit. Further
information relating to letters of credit is found below under
Liquidity.
Outlook
and Trends
Market conditions are difficult with terms and conditions under
pressure but for the most part pricing is broadly stable. As a
result, we are scaling back the amount of business that we write
in those areas where rates or terms have been most affected. Our
diversified model allows us to concentrate on lines of business
where business is better priced. In 2010 we have taken advantage
of market timing; for example in property catastrophe
reinsurance, we chose to write business earlier in the year
giving us better rates as we anticipated prices would be
weakening in April and July. We have also been able to benefit
from increased bank lending and trade flow in financial and
political risks insurance. Pricing in casualty business
continues to be difficult, particularly given the current
investment outlook, and we are reducing our exposure in this
sector.
Reinsurance: We have seen price declines
accelerating on property catastrophe business at the July
renewals reflecting both ample capacity and reduced demand from
cedants through higher retentions and decreased exposures
although we continue to view this as adequately priced business.
We saw rate increases on international accounts affected by the
Chile Earthquake loss, however, these were lower than we would
have liked. We also anticipate rate increases in Marine Energy
reinsurance following Deepwater Horizon.
Casualty reinsurance remains challenging with sustained rate
pressure on original business although reinsurance markets
generally continue to remain disciplined to date. Our
international casualty reinsurance account held up well in the
third quarter, with rates being flat on renewal business in
Australia. In general terms, we do not expect the environment to
improve until there is broader recognition of the challenges
posed by lower interest rates and future claims. Within our
specialty reinsurance division we have experienced good results
in credit and surety reinsurance and in our agriculture
reinsurance account, which we formed earlier this year.
Insurance: Casualty lines continue to
experience significant competitive pressures and now represent
less than 15% of our third quarter gross written premiums for
this segment, down from just over 27% in the comparable period
last year. Property insurance is characterized by ample capacity
and aggressive competitor behavior. In energy property
insurance, the Deepwater Horizon loss had the effect of
reversing the downward rating trend. The loss of the Aban Pearl
drilling unit in Venezuela, at a cost to the market of
$270 million to date, shortly afterwards acted as a further
brake, and there is also continued uncertainty surrounding the
ongoing regulation of the offshore drilling industry. These
three factors should result in a positive rating environment but
may be partly offset by surplus capacity in the market. In
aviation, we believe that there could be some removal of
capacity in 2011 for airline business but currently rates remain
under pressure. We continue to underwrite very selectively in
aviation and have focused on areas of the market such as
deductible buy-back insurance. We have seen new entrants in the
financial and political risk market and we expect price
increases to be more muted as a result. Nevertheless pricing,
particularly on the credit side, remains attractive and demand
reflects banks growing appetite to lend.
Application
of Critical Accounting Policies
Our condensed consolidated financial statements are based on the
selection of accounting policies and the application of
significant accounting estimates, which require management to
make significant estimates and assumptions. We believe that some
of the more critical judgments in the areas of accounting
estimates and assumptions that affect our financial condition
and results of operations are related to reserves for property
and liability losses, premiums receivable in respect of assumed
reinsurance, the fair value of derivatives and the value of
investments, including the extent of any
other-than-temporary
impairment. For a detailed discussion of our critical accounting
policies please refer to our 2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
and the notes to the financial statements contained in this
report.
41
We have discussed the application of these critical accounting
estimates with our Board of Directors and Audit Committee.
Results
of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
Compared to the Three Months Ended September 30,
2009
The following is a discussion and analysis of our consolidated
results of operations for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 starting with a discussion of
segmental results and then summarizing our consolidated results
under Total Income Statement Third
quarter below.
Underwriting
Results by Operating Segments
We are organized into two business segments: Reinsurance and
Insurance. We have considered similarities in economic
characteristics, products, customers, distribution, the
regulatory environment of our operating segments and
quantitative thresholds to determine our reportable segments.
We historically have managed our business in four segments:
property reinsurance, casualty reinsurance, international
insurance and U.S. insurance. On January 14, 2010, we
announced a new organizational structure where we intend to
manage our insurance and reinsurance businesses as two
underwriting segments, Aspen Insurance and Aspen Reinsurance, to
enhance and better serve our global customer base. As a result
of our organizational changes, in 2010 we now manage our
underwriting business in two operating segments: Insurance and
Reinsurance. The reinsurance segment consists of four principal
lines of business: property catastrophe reinsurance, other
property reinsurance, casualty reinsurance and specialty
reinsurance. The insurance segment consists of property
insurance, casualty insurance, marine, energy and transportation
insurance and financial and professional lines insurance.
Management measures segment results on the basis of the combined
ratio, which is obtained by dividing the sum of the losses and
loss expenses, acquisition expenses and operating and
administrative expenses by net premiums earned. Other than
corporate expenses, indirect operating and administrative
expenses are allocated to segments based on each segments
proportional share of gross earned premiums.
We have provided additional disclosures for corporate and other
(non-underwriting) income and expenses. Corporate and other
income includes net investment income, net realized and
unrealized investment gains or losses, corporate expense,
interest expense, net realized and unrealized foreign exchange
gains or losses and income taxes, which are not allocated to the
underwriting segments.
Please refer to the tables in Note 5 in our unaudited
financial statements of this report for a summary of gross and
net written and earned premiums, underwriting results and
combined ratios and reserves for our two business segments for
the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. The
contributions of each segment to gross written premiums in the
three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Written Premiums
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
Business Segment
|
|
Ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
% of total gross written premiums
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
56.8
|
%
|
|
|
60.4
|
%
|
Insurance
|
|
|
43.2
|
%
|
|
|
39.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Written Premiums
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
Business Segment
|
|
Ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
$
|
236.0
|
|
|
$
|
296.1
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
179.8
|
|
|
|
194.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
415.8
|
|
|
$
|
490.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
Reinsurance
Our reinsurance segment consists of property catastrophe
reinsurance, other property reinsurance (risk excess of loss,
pro rata, risk solutions and facultative), casualty reinsurance
(U.S. treaty, international treaty, and global facultative)
and specialty reinsurance (credit and surety, structured,
agriculture and specialty). Please see Note 5 to the
financial statements for further descriptions of the lines of
business within this segment.
Gross written premiums. Gross written premiums
in our reinsurance segment decreased by 20.3% compared to the
three months ended September 30, 2009. The decrease in
gross written premiums has come across lines, but in particular
specialty reinsurance. In 2009, we wrote a specific contract
within this division which was not available for renewal in 2010
and we have also reduced our appetite in certain accounts due to
prevailing market profitability.
The table below shows our gross written premiums for each line
of business for the three months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009, and the percentage change in gross written premiums
for each such line:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Written Premiums
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
Lines of Business
|
|
Ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
% increase/
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property catastrophe reinsurance
|
|
$
|
51.3
|
|
|
|
(11.7
|
)%
|
|
$
|
58.1
|
|
Other property reinsurance
|
|
|
66.3
|
|
|
|
(12.2
|
)
|
|
|
75.5
|
|
Casualty reinsurance
|
|
|
70.0
|
|
|
|
(11.5
|
)
|
|
|
79.1
|
|
Specialty reinsurance
|
|
|
48.4
|
|
|
|
(42.0
|
)
|
|
|
83.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
236.0
|
|
|
|
(20.3
|
)%
|
|
$
|
296.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses. The net
loss ratio for the three months ended September 30, 2010
was 53.6% compared to 44.1% in the equivalent period in 2009.
The increase in the loss ratio is attributable to a combination
of catastrophe losses of $20.4 million from the New Zealand
earthquake and to the reduction in the reserve releases which
reduced from $33.2 million in the third quarter of 2009 to
$3.3 million in the current period. Reserve releases in the
third quarter of 2009 were significantly higher than past trend,
driven by better than expected development on outstanding
claims, particularly in our risk excess and property pro-rata
books.
Further information relating to the movement of prior year
reserves is found below under Reserves for Losses and Loss
Adjustment Expenses.
Policy acquisition, operating and administrative
expenses. Policy acquisition expenses were
$43.9 million for the three months ended September 30,
2010 equivalent to 16.4% of net premiums earned
(2009 $49.3 million or 17.1% of net premiums
earned). The reduction is mainly due to lower profit-related
commissions and higher earned premium particularly from property
catastrophe which has a lower average commission rate and which
has provided a greater contribution to the total premiums
earned. An increase in operating and administrative expenses of
$1.4 million from the third quarter of 2009 is attributable
mainly to an increase in general expenses as we continue to
invest in the development of the business with new offices and
new teams.
43
Insurance
Our insurance segment consists of property insurance, casualty
insurance, marine, energy and transportation insurance and
financial and professional lines insurance. See Note 5 of
the financial statements for descriptions of the lines of
business within this segment.
Gross written premiums. Overall premiums have
decreased by 7.4% to $179.8 million for the quarter from
$194.2 million in the equivalent period in 2009. The
reduction in gross written premium is attributable to our
casualty insurance lines where we have declined business that
did not meet our profitability requirements coupled with higher
client retention in some classes. Increases in property
insurance and financial and professional lines mainly in our
financial and political risk lines are due to new business
opportunities and improving conditions in financial and
political risk.
The table below shows our gross written premiums for each line
of business for the three months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009, and the percentage change in gross written premiums
for each line:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Written Premiums
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
Lines of Business
|
|
Ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
% increase/
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property insurance
|
|
$
|
37.0
|
|
|
|
21.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
30.5
|
|
Casualty insurance
|
|
|
23.6
|
|
|
|
(55.6
|
)
|
|
|
53.1
|
|
Marine, energy and transportation insurance
|
|
|
70.1
|
|
|
|
(6.5
|
)
|
|
|
75.0
|
|
Financial and professional lines insurance
|
|
|
49.1
|
|
|
|
37.9
|
|
|
|
35.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
179.8
|
|
|
|
(7.4
|
)%
|
|
$
|
194.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses. The loss
ratio for the quarter was 77.3% compared to 59.2% for the three
months ended September 30, 2009. Losses for the three
months ended September 30, 2010 include $35.9 million
of net losses ($40.0 million including reinstatement
premiums) from two oil pipeline spills and a gas explosion in
California. The first oil pipeline loss affected the Kalamazoo
River in Michigan and we are reserved for our full participation
for this event. The second Enbridge loss in Romeoville is a
second event cover for Enbridge. Our exposure for Romeoville is
$10 million with the potential for very modest
deterioration (less than $5 million) if the loss amount for
the first event (Kalamazoo river) improves. Our maximum net
exposure to the gas explosion for PG&E is
$8.25 million, and we have currently reserved
$5.9 million as we believe it is unlikely that the top
layer of the cover will be affected.
Coverage for pipelines forms an integral part of an energy
account and typically does not extend beyond bodily injury
and/or
property damage emanating from gas explosions or oil leaks. The
losses we incurred from the Enbridge oil pipeline leaks and
PG&E gas explosion were in line with our expectations for
these types of events, although frequency was abnormally high.
We commenced writing energy liability insurance in the second
half of 2004 and since that time we have had fourteen pipeline
related losses of which three occurred during the last quarter.
Our maximum potential net line size for these types of coverage
is $20 million. However our average line any one risk for
our in-force business is $6.7 million.
Prior year reserve strengthening was $9.5 million compared
to a release of $11.0 million in the three months ended
September 30, 2009. The strengthening in the current
quarter was due largely to our financial and professional lines
where we have claims from financial institutions that have
exposure to the financial crisis. The comparative period
benefited from favorable loss experience across a number of
lines of business which had experienced better than expected
favorable development.
Policy acquisition, operating and administrative
expenses. Policy acquisition expenses of
$31.7 million for the three months ended September 30,
2010 equivalent to 17.2% of net premiums earned
(2009 $30.3 million or 16.6% of net earned
premium) were broadly in line with those in the third quarter of
2009. Operating and administrative expenses of
$23.6 million in the third quarter of 2010 are broadly in
line with the comparative period in 2009 due to both periods
including reorganization costs from our U.S. operations and
an allocation of Lloyds
start-up
costs.
44
Total
Income Statement Third quarter
Our statements of operations consolidate the underwriting
results of our two segments and include certain other revenue
and expense items that are not allocated to the business
segments.
Gross written premiums. Total gross written
premiums decreased by 15.2% to $415.8 million in the third
quarter of 2010 when compared to 2009 with the decrease arising
primarily from our reinsurance segment. The decrease in gross
written premium in our reinsurance segment is attributable
mainly to specialty reinsurance following the repositioning of
the account. Gross written premiums in the insurance segment
have decreased by 7.4% to $179.8 million when compared to
the third quarter of 2009 with lower contributions from casualty
insurance, where market conditions are challenging, and marine,
energy and transportation lines, where we have reduced our
exposure to Gulf of Mexico business in our energy account.
Reinsurance. Total reinsurance ceded for the
quarter of $38.8 million has increased by
$10.6 million from the third quarter of 2009 mainly in the
insurance segment where we purchased reinsurance for our new
U.S. professional lines business on an excess of loss basis
and have recognized $3.3 million of reinstatement costs in
our marine, energy and transportation division.
Gross premiums earned. Gross premiums earned
reflect the portion of gross premiums written which are recorded
as revenues over the policy periods of the risks we write. The
earned premium recorded in any year includes premium from
policies incepting in prior years and excludes premium to be
earned subsequent to the reporting date. Gross premiums earned
in the third quarter of 2010 decreased by 3.6% compared to the
third quarter of 2009 as a result of the reduction in gross
written premiums particularly in the reinsurance segment.
Net premiums earned. Net premiums earned have
decreased by $19.2 million or 4.1% in the third quarter of
2010 compared to 2009 which is consistent with the decrease in
gross earned premiums and the increase in reinsurance ceded for
the quarter.
Losses and loss adjustment expenses. The loss
ratio for the quarter has increased by 13.4 percentage
points compared to the third quarter of 2009 due to
$6.2 million reserve strengthening in the current quarter
compared to $44.2 million reserve releases in the third
quarter of 2009, losses associated with the New Zealand
earthquake and pipeline losses in the marine, energy and
transportation division. Reserve releases in our reinsurance
segment reduced from $33.2 million in the third quarter of
2009 to $3.3 million in the current period. The insurance
segment had a $9.5 million reserve strengthening this
quarter compared to an $11.0 million release in the third
quarter of 2009.
Expenses. We monitor the ratio of expenses to
gross earned premium (the gross expense ratio) as a
measure of the cost effectiveness of our policy acquisition,
operating and administrative processes. The table below presents
the contribution of the policy acquisition expenses and
operating and administrative expenses to the expense ratio and
the total expense ratios for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009. We also show the effect of
reinsurance which impacts on the reported net expense ratio by
expressing the expenses as a proportion of net earned premiums.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense Ratios
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
For the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Policy acquisition expenses
|
|
|
15.0
|
%
|
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
Operating and administrative expenses
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
|
12.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross expense ratio
|
|
|
27.9
|
%
|
|
|
27.4
|
%
|
Effect of reinsurance
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net expense ratio
|
|
|
31.1
|
%
|
|
|
30.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
Changes in the acquisition and operating and administrative
ratios to gross earned premiums and the impact of reinsurance on
net earned premiums by segment for each of the three months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 are shown in the
following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
Ratios Based on Gross
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
Earned Premium
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Policy acquisition expense ratio
|
|
|
15.8
|
%
|
|
|
14.1
|
%
|
|
|
15.0
|
%
|
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
|
|
13.7
|
%
|
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
Operating and administrative expense ratio
|
|
|
9.8
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross expense ratio
|
|
|
25.6
|
|
|
|
24.6
|
|
|
|
27.9
|
%
|
|
|
24.9
|
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
|
|
27.4
|
%
|
Effect of reinsurance
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net expense ratio
|
|
|
26.5
|
%
|
|
|
30.0
|
%
|
|
|
31.1
|
%
|
|
|
26.0
|
%
|
|
|
29.4
|
%
|
|
|
30.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The policy acquisition expense ratio of 16.7% for the quarter
has reduced from 16.9% in the third quarter of 2009. The
decrease is due to a combination of reduced profit related
commissions and the mix of business including more property
catastrophe reinsurance which has lower acquisition expenses.
The operating and administrative expense ratio, as a percentage
of net earned premium, has increased from 13.5% to 14.4% for the
same period with operating and administrative expenses
increasing to $50.7 million for the quarter compared with
$49.0 million in the third quarter of 2009. The slight
increase in operating and administrative expenses is due to
building out our U.S insurance capacity, a U.K. regional
platform and establishing a foothold in the Swiss market to
write insurance.
Total operating expenses for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 include $14.3m (2009 $14.7m)
of corporate expenses which are not allocated to our
underwriting segments. We consider corporate expenses to be
certain holding company costs necessary to support our worldwide
insurance and reinsurance operations, share based compensation
expense and costs associated with operating as a publicly traded
company.
Net investment income. Net investment income
for the quarter of $58.1 million is broadly in line with
the $58.9 million in the third quarter of 2009.
46
Change in fair value of derivatives. In the
three months ended September 30, 2010, we recorded a
reduction of $1.7 million (2009
$2.0 million) in the estimated fair value of our credit
insurance contract including an interest credit of
$0.2 million (2009 charge of $0.2 million)
and a charge of $2.1 million (2009 $Nil) for
the interest rate swaps. Further information on these contracts
can be found in Note 9 to the financial statements.
Other-than-temporary
impairments. We review all of our fixed
maturities for potential impairment each quarter based on
criteria including issuer-specific circumstances, credit ratings
actions and general macro economic conditions. The process of
determining whether a decline in value is
other-than-temporary
requires considerable judgment. As part of the assessment
process we also evaluate whether it is more likely than not that
we will sell any fixed maturity security in an unrealized loss
position before its market value recovers to amortized cost.
Once a security has been identified as
other-than-temporarily
impaired, the amount of any impairment included in net income is
determined by reference to the portion of the unrealized loss
that is considered credit-related. Non-credit related unrealized
losses are included in other comprehensive income. The realized
investments losses in the third quarter of 2010 did not include
a charge for investments we believe to be
other-than-temporarily
impaired (2009 $1.8 million).
Income before tax. In the third quarter of
2010, income before tax was $103.1 million comprised of
$25.3 million of underwriting income, $58.1 million in
net investment income, and $25.5 million of net realized
and unrealized investment and foreign exchange gains. In the
third quarter of 2009, income before tax was $171.1 million
which comprised $92.5 million of underwriting profits,
$58.9 million in net investment income, $22.5 million
of net foreign exchange and investment gains.
Income tax expense. Income tax expense for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 was
$10.3 million. Our effective consolidated tax rate for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 was 10.0%
(2009 14.8%). The charge represents an estimate of
the tax rate which will apply to our pre-tax income for 2010. As
discussed in the Overview above, the effective tax
rate for the year is subject to revision.
Net income after tax. Net income after tax for
the three months ended September 30, 2010 was
$92.8 million, equivalent to $1.14 basic earnings per
ordinary share adjusted for the $5.7 million preference
share dividends and $1.08 fully diluted earnings per ordinary
share adjusted for the preference share dividends on the basis
of the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue
during the three months ended September 30, 2010. The net
income for the three months ended September 30, 2009 was
$145.8 million equivalent to basic earnings per ordinary
share of $1.69 adjusted for the $5.6 million preference
share dividend and fully diluted earnings per share of $1.63.
47
Results
of Operations for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30,
2009
The following is a discussion and analysis of our consolidated
results of operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 starting with a discussion of
segmental results and then summarizing our consolidated results
under Total Income Statement Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2010 below.
Underwriting
Results by Operating Segments
Please refer to the tables in Note 5 in our unaudited
financial statements of this report for a summary of gross and
net written and earned premiums, underwriting results and
combined ratios and reserves for our two business segments for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. The
contributions of each segment to gross written premiums in the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Written Premiums
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
Business Segment
|
|
Ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
% of total gross written premiums
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
60.7
|
%
|
|
|
60.6
|
%
|
Insurance
|
|
|
39.3
|
%
|
|
|
39.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Written Premiums
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
Business Segment
|
|
Ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
$
|
1,009.4
|
|
|
$
|
1,006.3
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
654.6
|
|
|
|
655.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,664.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,661.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance
Our reinsurance segment consists of property catastrophe
reinsurance, other property reinsurance (risk of loss, pro rata,
risk solutions and facultative), casualty reinsurance
(U.S. treaty, international treaty, and global facultative)
and specialty reinsurance (credit and surety, agriculture,
structured and specialty). Please see Note 5 of the
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for
further descriptions of the lines of business within this
segment.
Gross written premiums. Gross written premiums
of $1,009.4 million in our reinsurance segment are in line
with the nine months ended September 30, 2009 of
$1,006.3 million. The increase in gross written premiums in
catastrophe reinsurance is due to deploying more of our
catastrophe capacity earlier in the year than in 2009 on the
basis that we expected catastrophe prices to decrease during the
remainder of the year and reflect also $12.8 million of
reinstatement premiums associated with the Chilean earthquake.
Gross written premiums have reduced by 11.8% in other property
reinsurance as we reduce our appetite for proportional treaty
exposures.
48
The table below shows our gross written premiums for each line
of business for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009, and the percentage change in gross written premiums
for each such line:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Written Premiums
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
Lines of Business
|
|
Ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
% increase/
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property catastrophe reinsurance
|
|
$
|
288.7
|
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
253.3
|
|
Other property reinsurance
|
|
|
220.7
|
|
|
|
(11.8
|
)
|
|
|
250.1
|
|
Casualty reinsurance
|
|
|
296.0
|
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)
|
|
|
301.6
|
|
Specialty reinsurance
|
|
|
204.0
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
201.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,009.4
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,006.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses. The net
loss ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was
64.3% compared to 43.0% in the equivalent period in 2009. The
increase in the loss ratio is attributable to losses of
$145.7 million ($132.9 million net of reinstatement
premiums) relating to the earthquakes in Chile and New Zealand
compared to an absence of significant catastrophe-related losses
in the comparable period of 2009. Net reserve releases of
$29.5 million (2009 $81.1 million) were
due mainly to favorable claims development in most lines but are
significantly lower than the comparable period of 2009 in
particular for property catastrophe and specialty reinsurance.
Further information relating to the movement of prior year
reserves is found below under Reserves for Losses and Loss
Adjustment Expenses.
Policy acquisition, operating and administrative
expenses. The policy acquisition expense ratio of
16.9% of net premiums earned for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 was 1.7 percentage points below the
same period in 2009 (2009 18.6%) due largely to the
mix of business with property catastrophe which attracts lower
average commission rates. This line of business has lower
brokerage costs and provides a greater contribution to the total
amount of business written. The increase in operating and
administrative expenses of $12.3 million from the same
period of 2009 is attributable mainly to an increase in general
expenses as we continue to invest in the development of the
business and establish new offices and our new credit and surety
and agriculture lines.
Insurance
Our insurance segment consists of property insurance, casualty
insurance, marine, energy and transportation insurance and
financial and professional lines insurance. See Note 5 of
the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for
descriptions of the lines of business within this segment.
Gross written premiums. Overall premiums of
$654.6 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 are in line with the $655.1 million from the
equivalent period in 2009. Gross written premium has increased
in both property insurance lines and financial and professional
business where we saw opportunities to write business that met
our profitability requirements. This has compensated for
difficult trading conditions in our casualty insurance and
marine, energy and transportation lines.
49
The table below shows our gross written premiums for each line
of business for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009, and the percentage change in gross written premiums
for each line:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Written Premiums
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
Lines of Business
|
|
Ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
% increase/
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property insurance
|
|
$
|
143.0
|
|
|
|
29.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
110.7
|
|
Casualty insurance
|
|
|
105.5
|
|
|
|
(28.8
|
)
|
|
|
148.2
|
|
Marine, energy and transportation insurance
|
|
|
298.8
|
|
|
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
|
318.5
|
|
Financial and professional lines insurance
|
|
|
107.3
|
|
|
|
38.1
|
|
|
|
77.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
654.6
|
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
$
|
655.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss adjustment expenses. The loss
ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was
71.8% compared to 69.9% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009. Losses for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 included $10.7 million for the
Deepwater Horizon oil spill and $35.9 million of net losses
($40.0 including reinstatement premiums) from two oil pipeline
spills and a gas explosion in California. Prior year reserve
strengthening was $20.7 million compared to
$10.1 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2009.
Policy acquisition, operating and administrative
expenses. Policy acquisition expenses were
$94.3 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 equivalent to 17.2% of net premiums earned
(2009 $86.5 million or 16.4% of net earned
premium), with the increase due mainly to a reduction in ceding
commission income for U.S. property insurance following the
cancellation of a reinsurance quota share. Operating and
administrative expenses of $65.9 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 are $4.8 million less
than the comparative period in 2009 due to the prior year
including reorganization costs from our U.S. operations,
set up cost for our new U.K. regional platform and Cologne
offices and an allocation of Lloyds
start-up
costs.
Total
Income Statement Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2010
Our statements of operations consolidate the underwriting
results of our two segments and include certain other revenue
and expense items that are not allocated to the business
segments.
Gross written premiums. Gross written premiums
for the first nine months of 2010 have increased by 0.2% to
$1,664.0 million when compared to the same period of 2009
with both segments in line with last year. Gross written
premiums in the reinsurance segment contain an additional
$26.5 million from new teams (credit and surety and
agriculture) and $35.3 additional catastrophe premium which
includes $12.8 million of reinstatement premiums from the
Chilean earthquake. These increases are compensated for by
reductions in other property reinsurance and other specialty
lines of business. Gross written premiums in the insurance
segment of $654.6 million for the first nine months of 2010
are in line with the same period of 2009 with additional
contributions from property insurance and financial and
professional lines where we saw opportunities to write business
that met our profitability requirements compensating for
reductions in casualty and marine, energy and transportation.
Reinsurance ceded. Total reinsurance ceded of
$168.1 million has decreased by $39.9 million from the
first nine months of 2009, due mainly to the insurance segment
following the cancellation of a reinsurance quota share for
U.S. property insurance, reduced exposures and higher
retentions.
Gross premiums earned. Gross premiums earned
reflect the portion of gross premiums written which are recorded
as revenues over the policy periods of the risks we write. The
earned premium recorded in any year includes premium from
policies incepting in prior years and excludes premium to be
earned subsequent to the reporting date. Gross premiums earned
in the first nine months of 2010 increased by 2.5% compared to
the same period of 2009 reflecting the higher written premium
earlier in the year and the $12.8 million of reinstatement
premiums from the Chilean earthquake.
50
Net premiums earned. Net premiums earned have
increased by $52.4 million or 3.9% in the first nine months
of 2010 compared to 2009 which is consistent with the increase
in gross earned premiums and the reduction in the cost of our
reinsurance purchased in that period.
Losses and loss adjustment expenses. Losses
and loss adjustment expenses have increased by 30.6% from
$720.6 million in 2009 to $941.3 million in 2010
primarily due to $145.7 million of losses from the Chilean
earthquake in the first quarter of 2010. Reserve releases were
$62.2 million lower in the current period due to less
favorable development impacting international casualty
reinsurance, professional lines and marine and transportation
insurance.
We have defined catastrophic losses as losses associated with
the Chilean earthquake in the first quarter of 2010 and the New
Zealand earthquake in the third quarter of 2010. Our current
estimate of loss for these events is $125.3 million for the
Chilean earthquake and $20.4 million for the New Zealand
earthquake. The underlying changes in accident year loss ratios
by segment are shown in the table below. The prior year claims
adjustment in the table below reflects claims development and
excludes premium adjustments.
The current year claims adjustments represent catastrophic loss
events.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accident Year Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio Excluding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior Year
|
|
|
Current Year
|
|
|
Prior and
|
|
|
|
Total Loss
|
|
|
Claims
|
|
|
Claims
|
|
|
Current Year
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Claims Adjustments
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
64.3
|
%
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
(16.4
|
)%
|
|
|
51.4
|
%
|
Insurance
|
|
|
71.8
|
%
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
68.0
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
67.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
(9.9
|
)%
|
|
|
58.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accident Year Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio Excluding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior Year
|
|
|
Current Year
|
|
|
Prior and
|
|
|
|
Total Loss
|
|
|
Claims
|
|
|
Claims
|
|
|
Current Year
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Claims Adjustments
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
43.0
|
%
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
52.9
|
%
|
Insurance
|
|
|
69.9
|
%
|
|
|
(1.9
|
)%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
68.0
|
%
|
Total
|
|
|
53.5
|
%
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
58.8
|
%
|
Expenses. We monitor the ratio of expenses to
gross earned premium (the gross expense ratio) as a
measure of the cost effectiveness of our policy acquisition,
operating and administrative processes. The table below presents
the contribution of the policy acquisition expenses and
operating and administrative expenses to the expense ratio and
the total expense ratios for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009. We also show the effect of
reinsurance which impacts on the reported net expense ratio by
expressing the expenses as a proportion of net earned premiums.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense Ratios
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
For the Nine Months
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30, 2010
|
|
|
Ended September 30, 2009
|
|
|
Policy acquisition expenses
|
|
|
15.4
|
%
|
|
|
15.9
|
%
|
Operating and administrative expenses
|
|
|
11.7
|
%
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross expense ratio
|
|
|
27.1
|
%
|
|
|
27.3
|
%
|
Effect of reinsurance
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
|
3.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net expense ratio
|
|
|
29.9
|
%
|
|
|
30.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
Changes in the acquisition and operating and administrative
ratios to gross earned premiums and the impact of reinsurance on
net earned premiums by segment for each of the three months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 are shown in the
following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
Ratios Based on Gross
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
Earned Premium
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Policy acquisition expense ratio
|
|
|
16.3
|
%
|
|
|
14.3
|
%
|
|
|
15.4
|
%
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
|
|
15.9
|
%
|
Operating and administrative expense ratio
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
|
|
|
11.7
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross expense ratio
|
|
|
25.3
|
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
|
|
27.1
|
|
|
|
25.6
|
|
|
|
24.2
|
|
|
|
27.3
|
|
Effect of reinsurance
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net expense ratio
|
|
|
26.3
|
%
|
|
|
29.2
|
%
|
|
|
29.9
|
%
|
|
|
26.8
|
%
|
|
|
29.8
|
%
|
|
|
30.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The policy acquisition ratio, gross of the effect of
reinsurance, has reduced marginally to 15.4% for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 from 15.9% for the comparative
period in 2009. The current year includes a higher contribution
from property catastrophe reinsurance which attracts a lower
average commission charge. The increase in acquisition costs for
insurance is due to changes in business mix which changed the
relative contributions from business lines that have different
average acquisition costs. Overall operating costs have remained
consistent as a percentage of gross earned premiums when
compared to last year although a small increase is due to the
continued investment in new teams.
Between the two periods, we have experienced a $7.5 million
increase in our operating and administrative expenses. The
increase is due mainly to staff and reorganization costs as we
continue to invest in the development of our business.
Total operating expenses for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 include $34.7 million
(2009 $34.2 million) of corporate expenses
which are not allocated to our underwriting segments. We
consider corporate expenses to be certain holding company costs
necessary to support our worldwide insurance and reinsurance
operations, share based compensation expense and costs
associated with operating as a publicly traded company.
Net investment income. Net investment income
of $175.0 million is down from $190.3 million last
year as the first half of 2009 benefited from a positive return
from our investment in funds of hedge funds and higher book
yields. Book yield on our fixed income portfolio of 3.9% has
decreased from the second quarter of 2010 and the third quarter
of 2009 due mainly to the persisting low interest rate
environment. The portfolio duration has decreased to
3.1 years from 3.3 years at the end of 2009 and
3.3 years in the third quarter of 2009. The average credit
quality of our fixed income portfolio is AA+, with
72% (2009 73%) of the portfolio being rated
AA or higher.
Change in fair value of derivatives. In the
nine months ended September 30, 2010, we recorded a
reduction of $5.7 million (2009
$5.8 million) in the estimated fair value of our credit
insurance contract including $0.2 million (2009
$0.4 million) of interest expense and a charge of
$2.1 million (2009 $Nil) for interest rate
swaps. Further information on these contracts can be found in
Note 9 to the financial statements.
Other-than-temporary
impairments. We review all of our fixed
maturities for potential impairment each quarter based on
criteria including issuer-specific circumstances, credit ratings
actions and general macro economic conditions. The process of
determining whether a decline in value is
other-than-temporary
requires considerable judgment. As part of the assessment
process we also evaluate whether it is more likely than not that
we will sell any fixed maturity security in an unrealized loss
position before its market value recovers to amortized cost.
Once a security has been identified as
other-than-temporarily
impaired, the amount of any impairment included in net income is
determined by reference to the portion of the unrealized loss
that is considered credit-related. Non-credit related unrealized
losses are included in other comprehensive income. The realized
investments losses for the first nine months of 2010 include a
$0.3 million charge for investments we believe to be
other-than-temporarily
impaired (2009 $19.9 million). These losses
were credit related and therefore are included in the income
statement.
52
Income before tax. In the first nine months of
2010, income before tax was $244.4 million and comprised
$39.9 million of underwriting income, $175.0 million
of net investment income, $42.4 million of net realized and
unrealized investment and foreign exchange gains,
$1.2 million of other expenses and $11.7 million of
interest expense. In the first nine months of 2009, income
before tax was $408.6 million which comprised
$215.1 million of underwriting profits, $190.3 million
of net investment income, $15.9 million of net foreign
exchange and investment gains, $0.9 million of other
expenses and $11.8 million of interest expense. Our
decrease in underwriting income in 2010 was mainly due to
$132.9 million of losses (net of reinstatements) associated
with the Chilean and New Zealand earthquakes and a
$62.2 million reduction in reserve releases. The change in
net foreign exchange and investment gains when compared to the
first nine months of 2009 was due predominantly to the reduction
in charges relating to
other-than-temporary
impairments of $0.3 million (2009
$19.9 million).
Income tax expense. Income tax expense for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 was
$24.4 million. Our effective consolidated tax rate for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 was 10.0%
(2009 15.0%). The charge represents an estimate of
the tax rate which will apply to our pre-tax income for 2010. As
discussed in the Overview above, the effective tax
rate for the year may be subject to revision.
Net income after tax. Net income after tax for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was
$220.0 million, equivalent to $2.63 basic earnings per
ordinary share adjusted for the $17.1 million preference
share dividends and $2.51 fully diluted earnings per ordinary
share adjusted for the preference share dividends on the basis
of the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue
during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Net income
for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was
$347.6 million equivalent to basic earnings per ordinary
share of $4.37 adjusted for the $18.3 million preference
share dividend and fully diluted earnings per share of $4.25.
Reserves
for Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses
As of September 30, 2010, we had total net loss and loss
adjustment expense reserves of $3,408.4 million
(December 31, 2009 $3,009.6 million). This
amount represented our best estimate of the ultimate liability
for payment of losses and loss adjustment expenses. Of the total
gross reserves for unpaid losses of $3,672.2 million at the
balance sheet date of September 30, 2010, a total of
$2,264.8 million or 61.7% represented IBNR claims
(December 31, 2009 $1,946.3 million and
58.4%, respectively). The following tables analyze gross and net
loss and loss adjustment expense reserves by segment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
|
|
Business Segment
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Recoverable
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
$
|
2,307.9
|
|
|
$
|
(65.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,242.9
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
1,364.3
|
|
|
|
(198.8
|
)
|
|
|
1,165.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total losses and loss expense reserves
|
|
$
|
3,672.2
|
|
|
$
|
(263.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,408.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
|
|
Business Segment
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Recoverable
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
$
|
2,069.4
|
|
|
$
|
(81.0
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,988.4
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
1,261.7
|
|
|
|
(240.5
|
)
|
|
|
1,021.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total losses and loss expense reserves
|
|
$
|
3,331.1
|
|
|
$
|
(321.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,009.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reduction in reinsurance recoverables is due to settlements
in our insurance segment related mainly to losses in our marine,
energy and transportation lines from gross losses associated
with Hurricane Ike and Hurricane Gustav.
53
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, there was a
reduction of our estimate of the ultimate net claims to be paid
in respect of prior accident years of $8.8 million. An
analysis of this reduction by business segment is as follows for
each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended
|
|
Business Segment
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
$
|
3.3
|
|
|
$
|
33.2
|
|
|
$
|
29.5
|
|
|
$
|
81.1
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
(9.5
|
)
|
|
|
11.0
|
|
|
|
(20.7
|
)
|
|
|
(10.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Losses and loss expense reserves reductions
|
|
$
|
(6.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
44.2
|
|
|
$
|
8.8
|
|
|
$
|
71.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The key elements which gave rise to the net adverse development
during the three months ended September 30, 2010 were as
follows:
Reinsurance. Net reserve releases of
$3.3 million in the current quarter were spread across two
of four reinsurance lines, with releases in other property
reinsurance and casualty reinsurance partially offset by some
small strengthening in both property catastrophe and specialty
reinsurance. The largest strengthening in the quarter was
$5.0 million from property catastrophe reinsurance.
Insurance. The net reserve strengthening of
$9.5 million in the quarter in the insurance segment was
due largely to our financial and professional lines where we
have isolated claims from financial institutions that have
exposure to Madoff and the financial crisis.
This included one new development with the potential to result
in professional indemnity claims against a bank which advised
hedge fund investors in respect of Madoff. Our participation in
this program is 20% of two excess layers with a total exposure
for us of $10 million of which we have reserved 50%. In
addition, there are two other Madoff related notifications where
we have established precautionary reserves in our insurance
segment in previous quarters. One of these notifications is now
fully reserved for our participation and the other is reserved
fully on the lower of two layers. There is only $5 million
of exposure on the higher layer.
Our financial and professional lines account includes financial
institutions, professional indemnity and D&O which we
commenced underwriting in late 2007. The account is mainly
written on a claims made basis and as a result insureds are
required to inform underwriters of any circumstances which may
develop into claims in the form of notifications. Notifications
are distinct from actual claims in that they are often made by
insureds at an early stage and on a cautionary basis, often
before material facts or circumstances which impact on liability
have become known. As a result, the majority of notifications
typically do not lead to covered claims. Accordingly, a
reserving decision based on notifications is an assessment made
based on our knowledge of the facts of a specific case as
notified at the time and our general understanding of similar
matters. As a result, it does not constitute an acknowledgement
or admission either that a claim has arisen or that such a claim
is covered by the terms of the relevant policy. Our reserving
approach to financial and professional lines as part of our
reserving process however has been appropriately conservative
and includes a thorough quarterly review of notified
circumstances.
As regards losses to financial institutions emanating from the
sub-prime litigation, the credit crisis and associated
exposures, we held net reserves of $153.0 million, plus
$18 million of paid losses. These reserves are as at
September 30, 2010 and cover both our insurance and
reinsurance segments.
We did not make any significant changes in assumptions used in
our reserving process. However, because the period of time we
have been in operation is relatively short, for longer tail
lines in particular, our loss experience is limited and reliable
evidence of changes in trends of numbers of claims incurred,
average settlement amounts, numbers of claims outstanding and
average losses per claim will necessarily take years to develop.
In 2011, we intend to publish loss triangles to further enhance
understanding of our reserving position and financial
performance by segment and lines of business when data is
available.
For a more detailed description see Managements
Discussion and Analysis Critical Accounting
Policies and Managements Discussion and
Analysis Reserves for Losses and Loss Adjustment
54
Expenses, included in our 2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
Balance
Sheet
Total
cash and investments
At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, total
cash and investments, including accrued interest receivable,
were $7.3 billion and $6.8 billion, respectively. The
composition of our investment portfolio is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Fixed Income
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Fixed Income
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
Marketable Securities Available for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government Securities
|
|
$
|
794.5
|
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
507.5
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
U.S. Government Agency Securities
|
|
|
344.0
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
389.1
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
Municipal Securities
|
|
|
34.1
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
19.5
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Corporate Securities
|
|
|
2,417.2
|
|
|
|
33.3
|
%
|
|
|
2,264.6
|
|
|
|
33.2
|
%
|
Foreign Government Securities
|
|
|
594.0
|
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
|
|
522.3
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
Asset-backed Securities
|
|
|
76.3
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
115.1
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
Mortgage-backed Securities
|
|
|
1,292.9
|
|
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
|
|
1,431.8
|
|
|
|
21.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fixed Income Available for Sale
|
|
|
5,553.0
|
|
|
|
76.5
|
%
|
|
|
5,249.9
|
|
|
|
77.0
|
%
|
Marketable Securities Trading
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government Securities
|
|
|
42.8
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
U.S. Government Agency Securities
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal Securities
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Securities
|
|
|
349.2
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
329.4
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
Foreign Government Securities
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
Asset-backed Securities
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fixed Income Trading
|
|
|
410.1
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
348.1
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
Total Other Investments
|
|
|
28.7
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
27.3
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Total Short-term Investments
Available-for-Sale
|
|
|
297.5
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
368.2
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
Total Short-term Investments Trading
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
Total Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
914.3
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
|
748.4
|
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
Total Receivable for Securities Sold
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Total Accrued Interest Receivable
|
|
|
57.2
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
54.6
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash and Investments
|
|
$
|
7,264.9
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,811.9
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities. At September 30, 2010,
the average credit quality of our fixed income portfolio is
AA+, with 96% of the portfolio being rated
A or higher. At December 31, 2009, the average
credit quality of our fixed income portfolio was
AA+, with 95% of the portfolio being rated
A or higher. Our fixed income portfolio duration has
decreased as at September 30, 2010 to 3.1 years from
3.3 years as at December 31, 2009 as we have taken a
more defensive duration stance in light of the prevailing
interest rate environment.
55
Mortgage-Backed Securities. The following
table summarizes the fair value of our mortgage-backed
securities (MBS) by rating and class at
September 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
|
AA and Below
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Agency
|
|
$
|
1,102.0
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,102.0
|
|
Non-agency Residential
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
35.5
|
|
|
|
40.4
|
|
Non-agency Commercial
|
|
|
124.0
|
|
|
|
26.5
|
|
|
|
150.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Mortgage-backed Securities
|
|
$
|
1,230.9
|
|
|
$
|
62.0
|
|
|
$
|
1,292.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our mortgage-backed portfolio is supported by loans diversified
across a number of geographic and economic sectors.
Alternative-A securities. We define
Alternative-A (alt-A) mortgages as those considered
less risky than
sub-prime
mortgages, but with lower credit quality than prime mortgages.
At September 30, 2010, we had $8.8 million invested in
alt-A securities (December 31, 2009
$9.3 million).
Other investments. As disclosed in
Note 6, on May 19, 2009, Aspen Holdings invested
$25.0 million in Cartesian Iris 2009A L.P. through our
wholly-owned subsidiary, Acorn Limited. Cartesian Iris 2009A
L.P. is a Delaware Limited Partnership formed to provide capital
to Iris Re, a Class 3 Bermudian reinsurer focusing on
insurance-linked securities. On June 1, 2010, the
investment in Cartesian Iris 2009A L.P. matured and was
reinvested in the Cartesian Iris Offshore Fund L.P. The
Companys involvement with Cartesian Iris Offshore
Fund L.P. is limited to its investment in the fund, and it
is not committed to making further investments in Cartesian Iris
Offshore Fund L.P.; accordingly, the carrying value of the
investment represents the Companys maximum exposure to a
loss as a result of its involvement with the partnership at each
balance sheet date.
In addition to returns on our investment, we provide services on
risk selection, pricing and portfolio design in return for a
percentage of profits from Iris Re. In the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2010, fees of $Nil and
$0.2 million, respectively, were payable to us.
The Company has determined that Cartesian Iris Offshore Fund
L.P. has the characteristics of a variable interest entity that
are addressed by the guidance in ASC 810,
Consolidation. Cartesian Iris Offshore Fund L.P. is not
consolidated by the Company. The Company has no decision-making
power, those powers having been reserved for the general
partner. The arrangement with Cartesian Iris Offshore Fund L.P.
is simply that of an investee to which the Company provides
additional services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed
|
|
|
|
Aspens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds
|
|
|
Fair Value of
|
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Realized Gain
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Distributed
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Cartesian Iris 2009 A L.P.
|
|
$
|
25.0
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
$
|
27.8
|
|
|
$
|
(27.8
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cartesian Iris Offshore Fund L.P.
|
|
|
27.8
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
28.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.7
|
|
Valuation
of Investments
Valuation of Fixed Income and Short Term Available for Sale
Investments and Fixed Income and Short-Term Trading
Investments. We use quoted values and other data
provided by internationally recognized independent pricing
sources as inputs into our process for determining the fair
value of our fixed income investments. Where multiple quotes or
prices are obtained, a price source hierarchy is maintained in
order to determine which price source provides the fair value
(i.e., a price obtained from a pricing service with more
seniority in the hierarchy will be used over a less senior one
in all cases). The hierarchy prioritizes pricing services based
on availability and reliability and assigns the highest priority
to index providers.
We consider prices for actively traded Treasury securities to be
derived based on quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets, which are Level 1 inputs in the fair value
hierarchy. We consider prices for other securities priced via
vendors, indices, or broker-dealers to be derived based on
inputs that
56
are observable for the asset, either directly or indirectly,
which are Level 2 inputs in the fair value hierarchy.
We consider securities, other financial instruments and
derivative insurance contracts subject to fair value measurement
whose valuation is derived by internal valuation models to be
based largely on unobservable inputs, which are Level 3
inputs in the fair value hierarchy. There have been no changes
in our use of valuation techniques during the year.
Pricing Services and Index Providers. Pricing
services provide pricing for less complex, liquid securities
based on market quotations in active markets. For securities
that do not trade on a listed exchange, these pricing services
may use matrix pricing consisting of observable market inputs to
estimate the fair value of a security. These observable market
inputs include: reported trades, benchmark yields, broker-dealer
quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities,
bids, offers, reference data, and industry and economic factors.
Additionally, pricing services may use a valuation model such as
an option adjusted spread model commonly used for estimating
fair values of mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities.
Broker-Dealers. For the most part, we obtain
quotes directly from broker-dealers who are active in the
corresponding markets when prices are unavailable from
independent pricing services or index providers. Generally,
broker-dealers value securities through their trading desks
based on observable market inputs. Their pricing methodologies
include mapping securities based on trade data, bids or offers,
observed spreads and performance on newly issued securities.
They may also establish pricing through observing secondary
trading of similar securities. Quotes from broker-dealers are
non-binding.
To validate the techniques or models used by third-party pricing
sources, we review process, in conjunction with the processes
completed by the third-party accounting service provider,
include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
quantitative analysis (e.g., comparing the quarterly return for
each managed portfolio to its target benchmark, with significant
differences identified and investigated);
|
|
|
|
initial and ongoing evaluation of methodologies used by outside
parties to calculate fair value; and
|
|
|
|
comparison of the fair value estimates to its knowledge of the
current market.
|
Prices obtained from brokers and pricing services are not
adjusted by us; however, prices provided by a broker or pricing
service in certain instances may be challenged based on market
or information available from internal sources, including those
available to our third-party investment accounting service
provider. Subsequent to any challenge, revisions made by the
broker or pricing service to the quotes are supplied to our
investment accounting service provider.
At September 30, 2010, we obtained an average of 3.1 quotes
per investment, compared to 3.4 quotes at December 31,
2009. Pricing sources used in pricing our fixed income
investments at September 30, 2010 and December 31,
2009, respectively, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at
|
|
|
As at
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Index providers
|
|
|
82.5
|
%
|
|
|
81.5
|
%
|
Pricing services
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
|
13.2
|
%
|
Broker-dealers
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation of Other Investments. The value of
our investments in funds of hedge funds was based upon monthly
net asset values reported by the underlying funds to our funds
of hedge fund managers. The financial statements of our funds of
hedge funds were subject to annual audits evaluating the net
asset positions of the underlying investments.
The value of our investment in Cartesian Iris 2009A L.P. is
based on our shares of the capital position of the partnership
which includes income and expenses reported by the limited
partnership as provided in its quarterly management accounts.
Cartesian Iris 2009A L.P. is subject to annual audit
57
evaluating the financial statements of the partnership. We
periodically review the management accounts of Cartesian Iris
2009A L.P. and evaluate the reasonableness of the valuation of
our investment.
Guaranteed Investments. The following table
presents the breakdown of investments which are guaranteed by
mono-line insurers (Wrapped Credit disclosure) and
those that have explicit government guarantees. The standalone
rating is determined as the senior unsecured debt rating of the
issuer. Where the credit ratings were split between the three
main rating agencies (S&Ps, Moodys, and Fitch),
the lowest rating was used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2009
|
|
Rating With
|
|
Rating without
|
|
Market
|
|
|
Rating With
|
|
Rating without
|
|
|
|
Guarantee
|
|
Guarantee
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Guarantee
|
|
Guarantee
|
|
Market Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
AAA
|
|
$
|
100.4
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
AAA
|
|
$
|
141.9
|
|
|
|
AA
|
|
|
16.3
|
|
|
|
|
AA
|
|
|
16.2
|
|
|
|
AA−
|
|
|
12.6
|
|
|
|
|
AA−
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
A+
|
|
|
64.0
|
|
|
|
|
A+
|
|
|
69.8
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
34.0
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
34.1
|
|
|
|
A−
|
|
|
95.9
|
|
|
|
|
A−
|
|
|
107.0
|
|
|
|
BBB+
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
|
|
|
BBB+
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBB−
|
|
|
22.4
|
|
|
|
|
BBB−
|
|
|
20.9
|
|
AA+
|
|
AA+
|
|
|
30.5
|
|
|
AA+
|
|
AA+
|
|
|
15.0
|
|
|
|
AA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AA
|
|
|
27.8
|
|
|
|
AA−
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
|
AA−
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A+
|
|
|
9.2
|
|
|
|
|
A+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
AA
|
|
AA
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
AA
|
|
AA
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
AA−
|
|
AA−
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
AA−
|
|
AA−
|
|
|
|
|
A−
|
|
A−
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
A−
|
|
A−
|
|
|
|
|
BBB−
|
|
BBB−
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
BBB−
|
|
BBB−
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
419.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
464.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our exposure to mono-line insurers was limited to 1 municipal
holding (2009 1 municipal holding) as at
September 30, 2010 with a market value of $0.1 million
(2009 $0.1 million). Our exposure to other
third-party guaranteed debt is primarily to investments backed
by the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and
non-U.S. government
guaranteed issuers.
Other-than-temporary
impairment. We review all of our fixed maturities
for potential impairment each quarter based on criteria
including issuer-specific circumstances, credit ratings actions
and general macro-economic conditions. The process of
determining whether a decline in value is
other-than-temporary
requires considerable judgment. As part of the assessment
process we also evaluate whether it is more likely than not that
we will sell any fixed maturity security in an unrealized loss
position before its market value recovers to amortized cost.
Once a security has been identified as
other-than-temporarily
impaired, the amount of any impairment included in net income is
determined by reference to that portion of the unrealized loss
that is considered to be credit related. Non-credit related
unrealized losses are included in other comprehensive income.
For a discussion of our valuation techniques within the fair
value hierarchy please see Note 7 of the financial
statements included elsewhere in this report.
58
Capital
Management
Capital Management. On January 5, 2010,
we entered into an accelerated share repurchase program with
Goldman Sachs to repurchase $200 million of our ordinary
shares. This transaction was completed on May 26, 2010
resulting in the repurchase and cancellation of 7,226,084
ordinary shares in the first half of 2010. The repurchase
completed the share repurchase program authorized by the Board
of Directors and announced on February 6, 2008. The
repurchase was funded with cash available and the sale of
investment assets.
On February 9, 2010, our Board of Directors authorized a
new repurchase program for up to $400 million of ordinary
shares. The authorization for the repurchase program covers the
period to March 1, 2012. This share repurchase program is
in addition to the accelerated share repurchase completed on
May 26, 2010. As at September 30, 2010, a total of
264,555 ordinary shares were repurchased and cancelled for a
total cost of $7.7 million.
On March 31, 2009, we repurchased and cancelled
2,672,500 million of our 7.401% $25 liquidation value
preference shares (NYSE: AHL-PA) at a price of $12.50 per share.
The repurchase resulted in a first quarter gain attributable to
ordinary shareholders of approximately $31.5 million which
was not recognized in the income statement but was included in
the calculation of earnings per share.
The following table shows our capital structure at
September 30, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at
|
|
|
As at
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Share capital, additional paid-in capital and retained income
and accumulated other comprehensive income attributable to
ordinary shareholders
|
|
$
|
3,087.1
|
|
|
$
|
2,951.8
|
|
Preference shares (liquidation preference less issue expenses)
|
|
|
353.6
|
|
|
|
353.6
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
249.7
|
|
|
|
249.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital
|
|
$
|
3,690.4
|
|
|
$
|
3,555.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management monitors the ratio of debt to total capital, with
total capital being defined as shareholders equity plus
outstanding debt. At September 30, 2010, this ratio was
6.8% (December 31, 2009 7.0%).
Our preference shares are classified in our balance sheet as
equity but may receive a different treatment in some cases under
the capital adequacy assessments made by certain rating
agencies. Such securities are often referred to as
hybrids as they have certain attributes of both debt
and equity. We also monitor the ratio of the total of debt and
hybrids to total capital which was 16.3% as of
September 30, 2010 (December 31, 2009
17.0%).
Access to capital. Our business operations are
in part dependent on our financial strength and the
markets perception thereof, as measured by
shareholders equity, which was $3,440.7 million at
September 30, 2010 (December 31, 2009
$3,305.4 million). We believe our financial strength
provides us with the flexibility and capacity to obtain funds
through debt or equity financing. Our continuing ability to
access the capital markets is dependent on, among other things,
our operating results, market conditions and our perceived
financial strength. We regularly monitor our capital and
financial position, as well as investment and securities market
conditions, both in general and with respect to Aspen
Holdings securities. Our ordinary shares and all our
preference shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
59
Liquidity
Liquidity is a measure of a companys ability to generate
cash flows sufficient to meet short-term and long-term cash
requirements of its business operations. Management monitors the
liquidity of Aspen Holdings and of each of its Insurance
Subsidiaries and arranges credit facilities to enhance
short-term liquidity resources on a stand-by basis.
Holding company. We monitor the ability of
Aspen Holdings to service debt, to finance dividend payments to
ordinary and preference shareholders and to provide financial
support to the Insurance Subsidiaries.
As at September 30, 2010, Aspen Holdings held
$54.5 million (December 31, 2009
$33.5 million) in cash and cash equivalents which
management considers sufficient to provide Aspen Holdings
liquidity at such time, taken together with dividends declared
or expected to be declared by subsidiary companies and our
credit facilities. Holding company liquidity depends on
dividends, capital distributions and interest payments from our
Insurance Subsidiaries.
In the nine months ended September 30, 2010, Aspen U.K.
Holdings paid Aspen Holdings interest of $27.4 million
(2009 $27.4 million) in respect of an
intercompany loan and dividends of $15.0 million
(2009 $138.0 million).
The ability of our Insurance Subsidiaries to pay us dividends or
other distributions is subject to the laws and regulations
applicable to each jurisdiction, as well as the Insurance
Subsidiaries need to maintain capital requirements
adequate to maintain their insurance and reinsurance operations
and their financial strength ratings issued by independent
rating agencies. For a discussion of the various restrictions on
our ability and our Insurance Subsidiaries ability to pay
dividends, see Part I, Item 1
Business Regulatory Matters in our 2009
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
Also for a more detailed discussion of our Insurance
Subsidiaries ability to pay dividends see Note 14 of
our annual financial statements in our 2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
Insurance subsidiaries. As of
September 30, 2010, the Insurance Subsidiaries held
approximately $848.8 million (December 31,
2009 $701.5 million) in cash and short-term
investments that are readily realizable securities. Management
monitors the value, currency and duration of cash and
investments held by its Insurance Subsidiaries to ensure that
they are able to meet their insurance and other liabilities as
they become due and was satisfied that there was a comfortable
margin of liquidity as at September 30, 2010 and for the
foreseeable future.
On an ongoing basis, our Insurance Subsidiaries sources of
funds primarily consist of premiums written, investment income
and proceeds from sales and redemptions of investments.
Cash is used primarily to pay reinsurance premiums, losses and
loss adjustment expenses, brokerage commissions, general and
administrative expenses, taxes, interest and dividends and to
purchase new investments.
The potential for individual large claims and for accumulations
of claims from single events means that substantial and
unpredictable payments may need to be made within relatively
short periods of time.
We manage these risks by making regular forecasts of the timing
and amount of expected cash outflows and ensuring that we
maintain sufficient balances in cash and short-term investments
to meet these estimates. Notwithstanding this policy, if our
cash flow forecast is incorrect, we could be forced to liquidate
investments prior to maturity, potentially at a significant loss.
60
The liquidity of our Insurance Subsidiaries is also affected by
the terms of our contractual obligations to policyholders and by
undertakings to certain regulatory authorities to facilitate the
issue of letters of credit or maintain certain balances in trust
funds for the benefit of policyholders. The following table
shows the forms of collateral or other security provided to
policyholders as at September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at September 30,
|
|
|
As at December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
($ in millions except percentages)
|
|
|
Assets held in multi-beneficiary trusts
|
|
$
|
1,753.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,495.8
|
|
Assets held in single beneficiary trusts
|
|
|
58.6
|
|
|
|
55.7
|
|
Secured letters of credit(1)
|
|
|
504.2
|
|
|
|
528.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,316.5
|
|
|
$
|
2,079.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total as % of cash and invested assets
|
|
|
32.1
|
%
|
|
|
30.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
As of September 30, 2010, the
Company had funds on deposit of $703.7 million and
£19.2 million (December 31, 2009
$667.1 million and £25.3 million) as collateral
for the secured letters of credit.
|
For more information see Note 14(a) and our 2009 Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
Consolidated cash flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010. Total net cash flow from
operations from December 31, 2009 through
September 30, 2010 was $502.3 million, a reduction of
$14.7 million over the comparative period. The reduction
was due mainly to lower premium receipts and increases in net
claims settlements. For the nine months ended September 30,
2010, our cash flow from operations provided us with sufficient
liquidity to meet our operating requirements. On August 27,
2010, we paid a dividend of $0.15 per ordinary share to
shareholders of record on August 12, 2010. On
October 1, 2010, dividends totaling $3.2 million on
our Perpetual Preferred Income Equity Replacement Securities
(Perpetual PIERS) were paid to our dividend
disbursing agent, for payment to our Perpetual PIERS holders of
record on September 15, 2010. On October 1, 2010,
dividends totaling $2.5 million on our Perpetual
Non-Cumulative Preference Shares (Perpetual Preference
Shares) were paid to our dividend disbursing agent, for
payment to our Perpetual Preference Share holders of record on
September 15, 2010.
Credit Facility. On July 30, 2010, we
entered into a three-year $280 million revolving credit
facility pursuant to a credit agreement (the credit
facilities) by and among the Company, certain of our
direct and indirect subsidiaries, including the Insurance
Subsidiaries (collectively, the Borrowers), the
lenders party thereto, Barclays Bank plc, as administrative
agent, Citibank, NA, as syndication agent, Credit Agricole CIB,
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon,
as co-documentation agents and The Bank of New York, as
collateral agent.
The facility can be used by any of the Borrowers to provide
funding for our Insurance Subsidiaries, to finance the working
capital needs of the Company and our subsidiaries and for
general corporate purposes of the Company and our subsidiaries.
The revolving credit facility further provides for the issuance
of collateralized and uncollateralized letters of credit.
Initial availability under the facility is $280,000,000, and the
Company has the option (subject to obtaining commitments from
acceptable lenders) to increase the facility by up to
$75,000,000. The facility will expire on July 30, 2013. As
of September 30, 2010, no borrowings were outstanding under
the credit facilities. The fees and interest rates on the loans
and the fees on the letters of credit payable by the Borrowers
increase based on the consolidated leverage ratio of the Company.
Under the credit facilities, we must maintain at all times a
consolidated tangible net worth of not less than approximately
$2.3 billion plus 50% of consolidated net income and 50% of
aggregate net cash proceeds from the issuance by the Company of
its capital stock, each as accrued from January 1, 2010.
The Company must also not permit its consolidated leverage ratio
of total consolidated debt to consolidated debt plus
consolidated tangible net worth to exceed 35%. In addition, the
credit facilities
61
contain other customary affirmative and negative covenants as
well as certain customary events of default, including with
respect to a change in control. The various affirmative and
negative covenants, include, among others, covenants that,
subject to various exceptions, restrict the ability of the
Company and its subsidiaries to; create or permit liens on
assets; engage in mergers or consolidations; dispose of assets;
pay dividends or other distributions, purchase or redeem the
Companys equity securities or those of its subsidiaries
and make other restricted payments; permit the rating of any
insurance subsidiary to fall below A.M. Best financial
strength rating of B++; make certain investments; agree with
others to limit the ability of the Companys subsidiaries
to pay dividends or other restricted payments or to make loans
or transfer assets to the Company or another of its
subsidiaries. The credit facilities also include covenants that
restrict the ability of our subsidiaries to incur indebtedness
and guarantee obligations.
On April 29, 2009, Aspen Bermuda replaced its existing
letter of credit facility with Citibank Europe dated
October 29, 2008 in a maximum aggregate amount of up to
$450 million with a new letter of credit facility in a
maximum aggregate amount of up to $550 million. As at
September 30, 2010, we had $361.7 million of
outstanding collateralized letters of credit under this facility.
On October 6, 2009, Aspen U.K. and Aspen Bermuda entered
into a $200 million secured letter of credit facility with
Barclays Bank plc, which is described on our current report on
Form 8-K
filed on October 7, 2009. As at September 30, 2010, we
had $46.0 million of outstanding collateralized letters of
credit under this facility compared to $53.8 million at the
end of 2009.
Contractual
Obligations and Commitments
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations
(other than our obligations to employees, our Perpetual PIERS
and our Perpetual Preference Shares) under long-term debt,
operating leases (net of subleases) and reserves relating to
insurance and reinsurance contracts as of September 30,
2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Later
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
Years
|
|
Total
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
Operating Lease Obligations
|
|
$
|
2.3
|
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
|
$
|
5.7
|
|
|
$
|
5.6
|
|
|
$
|
5.6
|
|
|
$
|
19.4
|
|
|
$
|
45.1
|
|
Long-Term Debt Obligations(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
249.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
249.7
|
|
Reserves for Losses and loss adjustment expenses(2)
|
|
$
|
299.7
|
|
|
$
|
1,037.2
|
|
|
$
|
657.9
|
|
|
$
|
441.3
|
|
|
$
|
298.9
|
|
|
$
|
937.2
|
|
|
$
|
3,672.2
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The long-term debt obligations
disclosed above do not include the $15 million annual
interest payments on our outstanding senior notes.
|
|
(2)
|
|
In estimating the time intervals
into which payments of our reserves for losses and loss
adjustment expenses fall, as set out above, we have utilized
actuarially assessed payment patterns. By the nature of the
insurance and reinsurance contracts under which these
liabilities are assumed, there can be no certainty that actual
payments will fall in the periods shown and there could be a
material acceleration or deceleration of claims payments
depending on factors outside our control. This uncertainty is
heightened by the short time in which we have operated, thereby
providing limited Company-specific claims loss payment patterns.
The total amount of payments in respect of our reserves, as well
as the timing of such payments, may differ materially from our
current estimates for the reasons set out in our 2009 Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
under Critical Accounting Policies
Reserves for Losses and Loss Expenses.
|
Further information on operating leases is given in our 2009
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
For a discussion of derivative instruments we have entered into,
please see Note 9 to our unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements for the three months ended
September 30, 2010 included elsewhere in this report.
Effects
of Inflation
Inflation may have a material effect on our consolidated results
of operations by its effect on interest rates and on the cost of
settling claims. The potential exists, after a catastrophe or
other large property loss, for the development of inflationary
pressures in a local economy as the demand for services such as
62
construction typically surges. We believe this had an impact on
the cost of claims arising from the 2005 hurricanes. The cost of
settling claims may also be increased by global commodity price
inflation. We seek to take both these factors into account when
setting reserves for any events where we think they may be
material.
Our calculation of reserves for losses and loss expenses in
respect of casualty business includes assumptions about future
payments for settlement of claims and claims-handling expenses,
such as medical treatments and litigation costs. We write
casualty business in the United States, the United Kingdom and
Australia and certain other territories, where claims inflation
has in many years run at higher rates than general inflation. To
the extent inflation causes these costs to increase above
reserves established for these claims, we will be required to
increase our loss reserves with a corresponding reduction in
earnings. The actual effects of inflation on our results cannot
be accurately known until claims are ultimately settled.
In addition to general price inflation we are exposed to a
persisting long-term upwards trend in the cost of judicial
awards for damages. We seek to take this into account in our
pricing and reserving of casualty business.
We also seek to take into account the projected impact of
inflation on the likely actions of central banks in the setting
of short-term interest rates and consequent effects on the
yields and prices of fixed interest securities. We consider that
although inflation is currently low, in the medium-term there is
a risk that inflation, interest rates and bond yields will rise
with the result that the market value of certain of our fixed
interest investments may reduce.
Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This
Form 10-Q
contains, and the Company may from time to time make other
verbal or written, forward-looking statements within the meaning
of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended
(the Securities Act), and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that involve risks
and uncertainties, including statements regarding our capital
needs, business strategy, expectations and intentions.
Statements that use the terms believe, do not
believe, anticipate, expect,
plan, estimate, project,
seek, will, may,
aim, continue, intend,
guidance and similar expressions are intended to
identify forward-looking statements. These statements reflect
our current views with respect to future events and because our
business is subject to numerous risks, uncertainties and other
factors, our actual results could differ materially from those
anticipated in the forward-looking statements. The risks,
uncertainties and other factors set forth in the Companys
2009 Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and other
cautionary statements made in this report, as well as the
following factors, should be read and understood as being
applicable to all related forward-looking statements wherever
they appear in this report.
All forward-looking statements address matters that involve
risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, there are or will be
important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those indicated in these statements. We believe
that these factors include, but are not limited to, the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
the possibility of greater frequency or severity of claims and
loss activity, including as a result of natural or man-made
(including economic and political risks) catastrophic or
material loss events, than our underwriting, reserving,
reinsurance purchasing or investment practices have anticipated;
|
|
|
|
the reliability of, and changes in assumptions to, natural and
man-made catastrophe pricing, accumulation and estimated loss
models;
|
|
|
|
evolving issues with respect to interpretation of coverage after
major loss events, and any intervening legislative or
governmental action;
|
|
|
|
the effectiveness of our loss limitation methods;
|
|
|
|
changes in the total industry losses, or our share of total
industry losses, resulting from past events such as the Chilean
Earthquake, Hurricanes Ike and Gustav, Deepwater Horizon and,
with respect to such events, our reliance on loss reports
received from cedants and loss adjustors, our reliance
|
63
|
|
|
|
|
on industry loss estimates and those generated by modeling
techniques, changes in rulings on flood damage or other
exclusions as a result of prevailing lawsuits and case law;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the impact of acts of terrorism and acts of war and related
legislation;
|
|
|
|
decreased demand for our insurance or reinsurance products and
cyclical changes in the insurance and reinsurance sectors;
|
|
|
|
any changes in our reinsurers credit quality and the
amount and timing of reinsurance recoverables;
|
|
|
|
changes in the availability, cost or quality of reinsurance or
retrocessional coverage;
|
|
|
|
the continuing and uncertain impact of the current depressed
lower growth environment in many of the countries in which we
operate;
|
|
|
|
the level of inflation in repair costs due to limited
availability of labor and materials after catastrophes;
|
|
|
|
changes in insurance and reinsurance market conditions;
|
|
|
|
increased competition on the basis of pricing, capacity,
coverage terms or other factors and the related demand and
supply dynamics as contracts come up for renewal;
|
|
|
|
a decline in our operating subsidiaries ratings with
S&P, A.M. Best or Moodys;
|
|
|
|
our ability to execute our business plan to enter new markets,
introduce new products and develop new distribution channels,
including their integration into our existing operations;
|
|
|
|
changes in general economic conditions, including inflation,
foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and other
factors that could affect our investment portfolio;
|
|
|
|
the risk of a material decline in the value or liquidity of all
or parts of our investment portfolio;
|
|
|
|
changes in our ability to exercise capital management
initiatives or to arrange banking facilities as a result of
prevailing market changes or changes in our financial position;
|
|
|
|
changes in government regulations or tax laws in jurisdictions
where we conduct business;
|
|
|
|
Aspen Holdings or Aspen Bermuda becoming subject to income taxes
in the United States or the United Kingdom;
|
|
|
|
loss of key personnel; and
|
|
|
|
increased counterparty risk due to the credit impairment of
financial institutions.
|
In addition, any estimates relating to loss events involve the
exercise of considerable judgment and reflect a combination of
ground-up
evaluations, information available to date from brokers and
cedants, market intelligence, initial tentative loss reports and
other sources. Due to the complexity of factors contributing to
losses and the preliminary nature of the information used to
prepare estimates, there can be no assurance that our ultimate
losses will remain within stated amounts.
The foregoing review of important factors should not be
construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with
the other cautionary statements that are included in this
report. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or review
any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new
information, future developments or otherwise or disclose any
difference between our actual results and those reflected in
such statements.
If one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties
materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be
incorrect, actual results may vary materially from what we
projected. Any forward-looking statements you read in this
report reflect our current views with respect to future events
and are subject to these and other risks, uncertainties and
assumptions relating to our operations, results of operations,
growth strategy and liquidity. All subsequent written and oral
forward-looking statements attributable to us or individuals
acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety
by the points made above. You should specifically consider the
factors identified in this report which could cause actual
results to differ before making an investment decision.
64
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
Interest rate risk. Our investment portfolio
consists primarily of fixed income securities. Accordingly, our
primary market risk exposure is to changes in interest rates.
Fluctuations in interest rates have a direct impact on the
market valuation of these securities. As interest rates rise,
the market value of our fixed-income portfolio falls, and the
converse is also true. Our strategy for managing interest rate
risk includes maintaining a high quality portfolio with a
relatively short duration to reduce the effect of interest rate
changes on book value. In addition the Company selectively
hedges its exposure to interest rates by entering into interest
rate swaps with financial institution counterparties in the
ordinary course of its investment activities.
As at September 30, 2010, our fixed income portfolio had an
approximate duration of 3.1 years. The table below depicts
interest rate change scenarios and the effect on our
interest-rate sensitive invested assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Changes in Interest Rates on Portfolio Given a
Parallel Shift in the Yield Curve
|
Movement in Rates in Basis Points
|
|
−100
|
|
−50
|
|
0
|
|
50
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions, except percentages)
|
|
|
|
Market value $ in millions
|
|
$
|
6,458.6
|
|
|
$
|
6,360.6
|
|
|
$
|
6,262.6
|
|
|
$
|
6,164.6
|
|
|
$
|
6,066.6
|
|
Gain/(loss) $ in millions
|
|
|
196.0
|
|
|
|
98.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(98.0
|
)
|
|
|
(196.0
|
)
|
Percentage of portfolio
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(1.6
|
)%
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)%
|
Equity risk. We had invested in two funds of
hedge funds where the underlying hedge funds consisted of
diverse strategies and securities. In February 2009, we gave
notice to redeem our remaining investments in funds of hedge
funds with effect on September 30, 2009, which would reduce
our exposure to equity risk. As the notices of redemption have
taken effect, we are no longer exposed to changes in the net
asset value of the funds.
Foreign currency risk. Our reporting currency
is the U.S. Dollar. The functional currencies of our
segments are U.S. Dollars, British Pounds, Euros, Canadian
Dollars, Swiss Francs, Australian Dollars and Singaporean
Dollars. As of September 30, 2010, approximately 83% of our
cash, cash equivalents and investments were held in
U.S. Dollars, approximately 8% were in British Pounds and
approximately 9% were in other currencies. For the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, approximately 21% of our gross
premiums were written in currencies other than the
U.S. Dollar and the British Pound and we expect that a
similar proportion will be written in currencies other than the
U.S. Dollar and the British Pound in the remainder of 2010.
Other foreign currency amounts are re-measured to the
appropriate functional currency and the resulting foreign
exchange gains or losses are reflected in the statement of
operations. Functional currency amounts of assets and
liabilities are then translated into U.S. Dollars. The
unrealized gain or loss from this translation, net of tax, is
recorded as part of shareholders equity. The change in
unrealized foreign currency translation gain or loss during the
period, net of tax, is a component of comprehensive income. Both
the re-measurement and translation are calculated using current
exchange rates for the balance sheets and average exchange rates
for the statement of operations. We may experience exchange
losses to the extent our foreign currency exposure is not
hedged, which in turn would adversely affect our results of
operations and financial condition. Management estimates that a
10% change in the exchange rate between British Pounds and
U.S. Dollars as at September 30, 2010, would have
impacted reported net comprehensive income by approximately
$33.4 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010.
We manage our foreign currency risk by seeking to match our
liabilities under insurance and reinsurance policies that are
payable in foreign currencies with investments that are
denominated in these currencies. This may involve the use of
forward exchange contracts from time to time. A forward exchange
contract involves an obligation to purchase or sell a specified
currency at a future date at a price set at the time of the
contract. Foreign currency exchange contracts will not eliminate
fluctuations in the value of our assets and liabilities
denominated in foreign currencies but rather allow us to
establish a rate of exchange for a future point in time. All
realized gains and losses on foreign exchange forward
65
contracts are recognized in the Statements of Operations. There
were no outstanding foreign currency contracts at
September 30, 2010 or at September 30, 2009.
Credit risk. We have exposure to credit risk
primarily as a holder of fixed income securities. Our risk
management strategy and investment policy is to invest in debt
instruments of high credit quality issuers and to limit the
amount of credit exposure with respect to particular ratings
categories, business sectors and any one issuer. As at
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the average
rating of fixed income securities in our investment portfolio
was AA+.
In addition, we are exposed to the credit risk of our insurance
and reinsurance brokers to whom we make claims payments for our
policyholders, as well as to the credit risk of our reinsurers
and retrocessionaires who assume business from us. Other than
fully collateralized reinsurance the substantial majority of our
reinsurers have a rating of A (Excellent), the third
highest of fifteen rating levels, or better by A.M. Best
and the minimum rating of any of our material reinsurers is
A− (Excellent), the fourth highest of fifteen
rating levels, by A.M. Best.
We have also entered into a credit insurance contract which,
subject to its terms, insures us against losses due to the
inability of one or more of our reinsurance counterparties to
meet their financial obligations to the Company. Payments are
made on a quarterly basis throughout the period of the contract
based on the aggregate limit, which was set initially at
$477 million but is subject to adjustment. The carrying
value of the derivative is the Companys maximum exposure
to loss.
See Note 9 to the unaudited financial statements for the
three months ended September 30, 2010 above.
The table below shows our reinsurance recoverables as of
September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, and our
reinsurers ratings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at
|
|
|
As at
|
|
A.M. Best
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
A++
|
|
$
|
15.9
|
|
|
$
|
13.2
|
|
A+
|
|
|
66.5
|
|
|
|
57.0
|
|
A
|
|
|
157.0
|
|
|
|
226.2
|
|
A−
|
|
|
17.1
|
|
|
|
21.3
|
|
Fully collateralized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
Not rated
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
263.8
|
|
|
$
|
321.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of
the Companys management, including the Companys
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has
evaluated the design and operation of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
of this report. Our management does not expect that our
disclosure controls or our internal controls will prevent all
errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well
conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system
are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect
the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits
of controls must be considered relative to their costs. As a
result of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all
control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the
Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include
the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty,
and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or
mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the
individual acts of some persons or by collusion of two or more
people. The design of any system of controls also is based in
part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future
events, and there can be no assurance that any design will
succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future
conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate. As a result of the
inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system,
misstatement due to error or fraud may occur and not be
detected. Accordingly, our disclosure controls and procedures
are designed to provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that
the disclosure requirements are met. Based on the evaluation of
the disclosure controls and procedures, the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective
in ensuring that information required to be disclosed in the
reports filed or submitted to the Commission under the Exchange
Act by the Company is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported in a timely fashion, and is accumulated and
communicated to management, including the Companys Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The Companys management has performed an evaluation, with
the participation of the Companys Chief Executive Officer
and the Companys Chief Financial Officer, of changes in
the Companys internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2010.
Based upon that evaluation, the Companys management is not
aware of any change in its internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the quarter ended
September 30, 2010 that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting.
67
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
In common with the rest of the insurance and reinsurance
industry, we are subject to litigation and arbitration in the
ordinary course of our business. Such legal proceedings can
arise from our underwriting or general business activities. The
latter would include commercial contractual disputes or
employment matters. Our Insurance Subsidiaries are regularly
engaged in the investigation, conduct and defense of disputes,
or potential disputes, resulting from questions of insurance or
reinsurance coverage or claims activities. Pursuant to our
insurance and reinsurance arrangements, many of these disputes
are resolved by arbitration or other forms of alternative
dispute resolution. In some jurisdictions, noticeably the U.S.,
a failure to deal with such disputes or potential disputes in an
appropriate manner could result in an award of bad
faith punitive damages against our Insurance Subsidiaries.
While any legal or arbitration proceedings contain an element of
uncertainty, we do not believe that the eventual outcome of any
specific litigation, arbitration or alternative dispute
resolution proceedings to which we are currently a party will
have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of our
business as a whole.
We are not currently involved in any material pending litigation
or arbitration proceedings.
There have been no significant changes in the Companys
risk factors as discussed in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009. However, also please
refer to the Cautionary Statement Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements provided elsewhere in this
report.
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
In connection with the options held by the Names Trustee
as described further in Note 12 to our financial
statements, the Names Trustee may exercise the options on
a monthly basis. The options were exercised on a cashless basis
at the exercise price as described in Note 11 to our
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. As a
result, we issued the following unregistered shares to the
Names Trustee and its beneficiaries as described below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
Date Issued
|
|
Shares Issued
|
|
August 16, 2010
|
|
|
454
|
|
September 15, 2010
|
|
|
2,789
|
|
None of the transactions involved any underwriters, underwriting
discounts or commissions, or any public offering and we believe
that each transaction, if deemed to be a sale of a security, was
exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act
by virtue of Section 4(2) thereof or Regulation S for
offerings of securities outside the United States. Such
securities were restricted as to transfers and appropriate
legends were affixed to the share certificates and instruments
in such transactions.
The following table provides information about purchases by the
Company during the quarter ended September 30, 2010 of the
Companys equity securities.
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) Maximum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number (or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) Total
|
|
|
Approximate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Dollar Value)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share (or Units)
|
|
|
of Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as
|
|
|
(or Units) That
|
|
|
|
(a) Total
|
|
|
(b) Average
|
|
|
Part of
|
|
|
May Yet Be
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Price Paid
|
|
|
Publicly Announced
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
|
Share (or Units)
|
|
|
per Share
|
|
|
Plans or
|
|
|
Under the Plans
|
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
(or Units)
|
|
|
Programs
|
|
|
or Programs
|
|
|
July 1, 2010 to July 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 1, 2010 to August 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010
|
|
|
264,555
|
(1)
|
|
$
|
28.97
|
|
|
|
264,555
|
|
|
$
|
392.3
|
|
Total
|
|
|
264,555
|
|
|
$
|
28.97
|
|
|
|
264,555
|
|
|
$
|
392.3
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
On February 9, 2010 our Board
of Directors authorized a new repurchase program for up to
$400 million of our ordinary shares. The authorization for
the repurchase program covers the period to March 1, 2012.
This share repurchase program was in addition to the completed
accelerated share repurchase program entered into on
January 5, 2010. On September 2, 2010, we initiated an
open market purchase program to purchase ordinary shares in the
open market. The 264,555 ordinary shares we repurchased during
September 2010 were purchased in the open market and
subsequently cancelled.
|
In addition to the share repurchase program, we purchase shares
offered from time to time by the Names Trustee. On
June 23, 2010 an agreement was signed to repurchase 10,835
shares from the Names Trustee. The shares were repurchased
on July 7, 2010 and subsequently cancelled.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
None.
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
(a) The following sets forth those exhibits filed pursuant
to Item 601 of
Regulation S-K:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Credit agreement dated as of July 30, 2010, among Aspen
Insurance Holdings Limited, various subsidiaries thereof,
various lenders and Barclays Bank plc, as administrative agent
(filed on From
8-K,
August 4, 2010).
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Officer Certification of Christopher OKane, Chief
Executive Officer of Aspen Insurance Holdings Limited, as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, filed with this report.
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Officer Certification of Richard Houghton, Chief Financial
Officer of Aspen Insurance Holdings Limited, as adopted pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed
with this report.
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Officer Certification of Christopher OKane, Chief
Executive Officer of Aspen Insurance Holdings Limited, and
Richard Houghton, Chief Financial Officer of Aspen Insurance
Holdings Limited, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, submitted with this report.
|
|
101
|
.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document submitted with this report
|
|
101
|
.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document submitted with this
report
|
|
101
|
.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document submitted with this
report
|
|
101
|
.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document submitted with this
report
|
69
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
ASPEN INSURANCE HOLDINGS LIMITED
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ Christopher
OKane
|
Date: November 9, 2010
|
|
Christopher OKane
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 9, 2010
|
|
Richard Houghton
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
70