AUDACY, INC. - Quarter Report: 2009 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
or
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-14461
Entercom Communications Corp.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Pennsylvania |
|
23-1701044 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. employer identification no.) |
401 City Avenue, Suite 809
Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania 19004
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
(610) 660-5610
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer x |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class A common stock, $.01 par value 28,885,472 Shares Outstanding as of April 29, 2009
(Class A Shares Outstanding include 1,205,724 unvested and vested but deferred restricted stock units)
Class B common stock, $.01 par value 7,607,532 Shares Outstanding as of April 29, 2009
ENTERCOM COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
||||
|
|
|
||
1 |
||||
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
26 |
|||
33 |
||||
34 |
||||
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
|
|
||
35 |
||||
35 |
||||
35 |
||||
35 |
||||
35 |
||||
35 |
||||
36 |
||||
|
|
|
||
|
37 |
|||
|
|
|
||
|
38 |
|||
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act Safe Harbor Statement
In addition to historical information, this report contains statements by us with regard to our expectations as to financial results and other aspects of our business that involve risks and uncertainties and may constitute forward- looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Forward-looking statements are presented for illustrative purposes only and reflect our current expectations concerning future results and events. All statements other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements for purposes of federal and state securities laws, including, without limitation, any projections of earnings, revenues or other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations; any statements concerning proposed new services or developments; any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance; any statements of belief; and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing.
You can identify forward-looking statements by our use of words such as anticipates, believes, continues, expects, intends, likely, may, opportunity, plans, potential, project, will, and similar expressions which identify forward-looking statements, whether in the negative or the affirmative. We cannot guarantee that we actually will achieve these plans, intentions or expectations. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those forecasted or anticipated in such forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect our view only as of the date of this report. We undertake no obligation to update these statements or publicly release the result of any revision(s) to these statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Key risks to our company are described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 26, 2009 and as may be supplemented by the risks described under Part II, Item 1A, of our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.
i
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ENTERCOM COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
MARCH 31, 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2008
(amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)
ASSETS
|
|
MARCH 31, |
|
DECEMBER 31, |
|
||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
CURRENT ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
9,063 |
|
$ |
4,284 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
57,481 |
|
75,354 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and deposits |
|
6,686 |
|
4,801 |
|
||
Prepaid and refundable income taxes |
|
551 |
|
628 |
|
||
Short-term investment |
|
23 |
|
23 |
|
||
Total current assets |
|
73,804 |
|
85,090 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
INVESTMENTS |
|
1,369 |
|
1,376 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Land, land easements and land improvements |
|
16,486 |
|
16,486 |
|
||
Buildings |
|
20,964 |
|
20,964 |
|
||
Equipment |
|
123,376 |
|
122,986 |
|
||
Furniture and fixtures |
|
15,432 |
|
15,029 |
|
||
Leasehold improvements |
|
21,206 |
|
21,129 |
|
||
|
|
197,464 |
|
196,594 |
|
||
Accumulated depreciation |
|
(116,867 |
) |
(113,036 |
) |
||
|
|
80,597 |
|
83,558 |
|
||
Capital improvements in progress |
|
1,153 |
|
1,306 |
|
||
Net property and equipment |
|
81,750 |
|
84,864 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
RADIO BROADCASTING LICENSES |
|
768,646 |
|
768,646 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
GOODWILL |
|
45,050 |
|
45,050 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
DEFERRED CHARGES AND OTHER ASSETS - Net |
|
10,840 |
|
11,708 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TOTAL |
|
$ |
981,459 |
|
$ |
996,734 |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
ENTERCOM COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
MARCH 31, 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2008
(amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
MARCH 31, |
|
DECEMBER 31, |
|
||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
CURRENT LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
1,718 |
|
$ |
352 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
12,898 |
|
15,231 |
|
||
Accrued liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Salaries |
|
6,243 |
|
7,484 |
|
||
Interest |
|
545 |
|
2,343 |
|
||
Advertiser obligations and other commitments |
|
1,166 |
|
1,197 |
|
||
Other |
|
5,287 |
|
5,684 |
|
||
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
45,023 |
|
30,023 |
|
||
Total current liabilities |
|
72,880 |
|
62,314 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Senior debt |
|
709,168 |
|
720,174 |
|
||
7.625% senior subordinated notes |
|
62,466 |
|
83,500 |
|
||
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
1,363 |
|
|
|
||
Other long-term liabilities |
|
30,062 |
|
30,489 |
|
||
Total long-term liabilities |
|
803,059 |
|
834,163 |
|
||
Total liabilities |
|
875,939 |
|
896,477 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Class A, B and C common stock |
|
365 |
|
371 |
|
||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
446,801 |
|
582,325 |
|
||
Accumulated deficit |
|
(325,399 |
) |
(467,177 |
) |
||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
(16,247 |
) |
(15,262 |
) |
||
Total shareholders equity |
|
105,520 |
|
100,257 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
TOTAL |
|
$ |
981,459 |
|
$ |
996,734 |
|
2
ENTERCOM COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008
(amounts in thousands, except share and per share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED |
|
||||
|
|
MARCH 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NET REVENUES |
|
$ |
75,371 |
|
$ |
95,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
OPERATING (INCOME) EXPENSE: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Station operating expenses, including non-cash compensation expense of $90 in 2009 and $383 in 2008 |
|
58,569 |
|
64,090 |
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
4,316 |
|
6,002 |
|
||
Corporate general and administrative expenses, including non-cash compensation expense of $1,702 in 2009 and $3,190 in 2008 |
|
5,687 |
|
8,335 |
|
||
Time brokerage agreement income |
|
(2 |
) |
(98 |
) |
||
Net (gain) loss on sale or disposal of assets |
|
7 |
|
(10,021 |
) |
||
Total operating expense |
|
68,577 |
|
68,308 |
|
||
OPERATING INCOME |
|
6,794 |
|
27,082 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest expense, including amortization of deferred financing costs of $394 in 2009 and $428 in 2008 |
|
8,113 |
|
13,564 |
|
||
Interest and dividend income |
|
(8 |
) |
(79 |
) |
||
Net gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
(7,755 |
) |
(1,769 |
) |
||
Net gain on derivative instruments |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
||
Loss on investments |
|
|
|
76 |
|
||
Other income |
|
(380 |
) |
|
|
||
TOTAL OTHER EXPENSE |
|
(30 |
) |
11,758 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
|
6,824 |
|
15,324 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
INCOME TAXES |
|
1,488 |
|
6,155 |
|
||
INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
|
5,336 |
|
9,169 |
|
||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax benefit |
|
|
|
(3,944 |
) |
||
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
5,336 |
|
$ |
5,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NET INCOME PER SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income tax benefit |
|
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
||
NET INCOME PER SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
DIVIDENDS DECLARED AND PAID PER COMMON SHARE |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Basic |
|
35,393,660 |
|
37,635,517 |
|
||
Diluted |
|
35,482,330 |
|
37,736,063 |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
ENTERCOM COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008
(amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED |
|
||||
|
|
MARCH 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
NET INCOME |
|
$ |
5,336 |
|
$ |
5,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAX PROVISION OR BENEFIT: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Unrealized gain on investments, net of a tax provision of $16 in 2008 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Unrealized loss on derivatives, net of a tax benefit of $-0- in 2009 and $1,113 in 2008 |
|
(985 |
) |
(1,720 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
$ |
4,351 |
|
$ |
3,529 |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
ENTERCOM COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
(amounts in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Additional |
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Class A |
|
Class B |
|
Paid-in |
|
Retained |
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Capital |
|
Earnings |
|
Income |
|
Total |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
|
31,132,700 |
|
$ |
311 |
|
7,607,532 |
|
$ |
76 |
|
$ |
595,915 |
|
$ |
64,597 |
|
$ |
(132 |
) |
$ |
660,767 |
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(516,651 |
) |
|
|
(516,651 |
) |
||||||
Compensation expense related to granting of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
|
|
425 |
|
||||||
Compensation expense related to granting of restricted stock |
|
478,075 |
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
8,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
8,241 |
|
||||||
Issuance of common stock related to an incentive plan |
|
72,092 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
|
|
329 |
|
||||||
Common stock repurchase |
|
(2,073,518 |
) |
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(13,923 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(13,944 |
) |
||||||
Purchase of vested employee restricted stock units |
|
(130,161 |
) |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1,374 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(1,375 |
) |
||||||
Payments of dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,282 |
) |
(14,301 |
) |
|
|
(21,583 |
) |
||||||
Dividend equivalents on restricted stock units (net of forfeitures and payments) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(822 |
) |
|
|
(822 |
) |
||||||
Net unrealized loss on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,262 |
) |
(15,262 |
) |
||||||
Net unrealized gain on investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
132 |
|
||||||
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
29,479,188 |
|
295 |
|
7,607,532 |
|
76 |
|
582,325 |
|
(467,177 |
) |
(15,262 |
) |
100,257 |
|
||||||
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,336 |
|
|
|
5,336 |
|
||||||
Compensation expense related to granting of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
||||||
Compensation expense related to granting of restricted stock units |
|
73,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,679 |
|
||||||
Issuance of common stock related to an incentive plan |
|
74,369 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
||||||
Common stock repurchase |
|
(662,664 |
) |
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(882 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(888 |
) |
||||||
Purchase of vested employee restricted stock units |
|
(78,847 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(87 |
) |
||||||
Dividend equivalents on restricted stock units (net of forfeitures and payments) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
||||||
Net unrealized loss on derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(985 |
) |
(985 |
) |
||||||
Balance, March 31, 2009 |
|
28,885,558 |
|
$ |
289 |
|
7,607,532 |
|
$ |
76 |
|
$ |
583,230 |
|
$ |
(461,828 |
) |
$ |
(16,247 |
) |
$ |
105,520 |
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
ENTERCOM COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008
(amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED |
|
||||
|
|
MARCH 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net income |
|
$ |
5,336 |
|
$ |
5,225 |
|
Income from discontinued operations before impairment loss, net of tax provision |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
||
Impairment loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
6,675 |
|
||
Deferred tax benefit from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
(2,715 |
) |
||
Income from continuing operations |
|
5,336 |
|
9,169 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations to net cash provided by continuing operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
4,316 |
|
6,002 |
|
||
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
394 |
|
428 |
|
||
Deferred taxes |
|
1,488 |
|
6,155 |
|
||
Provision for bad debts |
|
691 |
|
593 |
|
||
Net (gain) loss on sale or disposal of assets |
|
7 |
|
(10,021 |
) |
||
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense |
|
1,792 |
|
3,573 |
|
||
Net loss on investments |
|
|
|
76 |
|
||
Net gain on derivative instruments |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
||
Deferred rent |
|
20 |
|
78 |
|
||
Unearned revenue - long-term |
|
(210 |
) |
(10 |
) |
||
Net gain on extinguishment of debt |
|
(7,755 |
) |
(1,769 |
) |
||
Deferred compensation |
|
41 |
|
678 |
|
||
Tax benefit for vesting of restricted stock unit awards |
|
|
|
(474 |
) |
||
Other income |
|
(380 |
) |
|
|
||
Changes in assets and liabilities (net of effects of acquisitions and dispositions in all years and the effect of deconsolidation activities in 2008): |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable |
|
17,188 |
|
14,180 |
|
||
Prepaid expenses and deposits |
|
(2,237 |
) |
(3,419 |
) |
||
Prepaid and refundable income taxes |
|
77 |
|
122 |
|
||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
(2,696 |
) |
(4,323 |
) |
||
Accrued Interest expense |
|
(1,798 |
) |
(3,224 |
) |
||
Accrued expenses - long-term |
|
(577 |
) |
|
|
||
Prepaid expenses - long-term |
|
200 |
|
200 |
|
||
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities |
|
15,897 |
|
17,980 |
|
||
Net cash provided by discontinued operating activities |
|
|
|
16 |
|
||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
15,897 |
|
17,996 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Additions to property and equipment |
|
(823 |
) |
(3,027 |
) |
||
Proceeds from sale of property, equipment, intangibles and other assets |
|
16 |
|
21,003 |
|
||
Deferred charges and other assets |
|
(33 |
) |
(564 |
) |
||
Purchases of investments |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
||
Proceeds from investments |
|
7 |
|
166 |
|
||
Proceeds from termination of radio station contract |
|
380 |
|
|
|
||
Station acquisition deposits and costs |
|
|
|
3,671 |
|
||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
(453 |
) |
21,243 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
18,000 |
|
42,500 |
|
||
Payments of long-term debt |
|
(14,006 |
) |
(44,005 |
) |
||
Retirement of senior subordinated debt |
|
(13,030 |
) |
(28,730 |
) |
||
Purchase of the Companys common stock |
|
(888 |
) |
|
|
||
Proceeds from issuance of employee stock plan |
|
82 |
|
103 |
|
||
Purchase of vested restricted stock units |
|
(87 |
) |
(1,343 |
) |
||
Payment of dividend equivalents on vested restricted stock units |
|
(736 |
) |
(890 |
) |
||
Payment of dividends |
|
|
|
(14,301 |
) |
||
Tax benefit for vesting of restricted stock awards |
|
|
|
474 |
|
||
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
(10,665 |
) |
(46,192 |
) |
||
6
ENTERCOM COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008
(amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
THREE MONTHS ENDED |
|
||||
|
|
MARCH 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
4,779 |
|
(6,953 |
) |
||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR |
|
4,284 |
|
10,945 |
|
||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
9,063 |
|
$ |
3,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest |
|
$ |
9,499 |
|
$ |
15,489 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
73 |
|
$ |
1 |
|
Dividends |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
14,301 |
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES ON NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES -
In connection with the issuance of 0.1 million and 0.5 million restricted stock units (net of forfeitures) during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, the Company will increase its paid-in capital in the amount of $0.3 million and $6.2 million, respectively, over the vesting period of the restricted stock units.
On March 14, 2008, the Company completed an exchange of radio station assets with Bonneville International Corporation and as a result the Company: (1) received $220.0 million in assets, including cash of $1.0 million; (2) provided assets with a basis of $209.9 million; (3) incurred transaction costs of $0.1 million; and (3) recorded a gain of $10.0 million.
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
ENTERCOM COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The condensed consolidated interim unaudited financial statements included herein have been prepared by Entercom Communications Corp. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) in accordance with: (i) generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information; and (ii) the instructions of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the financial statements reflect all adjustments considered necessary for a fair statement of the results of operations and financial position for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. The Companys results are subject to seasonal fluctuations and, therefore, the results shown on an interim basis are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.
This Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008 and filed with the SEC on February 26, 2009, as part of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
FAS No. 142-3
In April 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) No. 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets, which amends the factors that should be considered in developing the renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of recognized intangible assets under FAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. FAS No. 142-3, which requires expanded disclosure regarding the determination of intangible asset useful lives, also improves the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FAS No. 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under FAS No. 141R. FAS No. 142-3 was effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. The impact to the Company will be limited to the application of this standard to future acquisitions.
FAS No. 161
In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities - an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. FAS No. 161 changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about: (1) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments; (2) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations; and (3) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys financial position, financial performance and cash flows. The guidance in FAS No. 161 was effective on January 1, 2009. The Company has included the relevant disclosures in its financial statements in Note 7, Derivatives And Hedging Activities, beginning with the three months ended March 31, 2009.
FAS No. 160
In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements - an Amendment of ARB No. 51. FAS No. 160 changes the accounting and reporting for minority interests, which are recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a component of equity. FAS No. 160 was effective for the Company as of January 1, 2009. The adoption of FAS No. 160 did not have an impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
FAS No. 141R And FAS No. 141R-a
In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 141R, Business Combinations, that will significantly change how business combinations are accounted for through the use of fair values in financial reporting and will impact financial statements both on the acquisition date and in subsequent periods. In February 2009, the FASB issued FAS No. 141R-a, Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies, which allows an exception to the recognition and fair value measurement principles of
8
FAS 141R. This exception requires that acquired contingencies be recognized at fair value on the acquisition date if fair value can be reasonably estimated during the allocation period. FAS No. 141R was effective for the Company as of January 1, 2009 for all business combinations that close on or after January 1, 2009.
2. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
As of March 31, 2009, 1.6 million shares are available for future grant under the Entercom Equity Compensation Plan (the Plan). On January 1 of each year, the number of shares of Class A common stock authorized under the Plan is automatically increased by 1.5 million, or a lesser number as may be determined by the Companys Board of Directors. On January 1, 2009, the shares available for grant were automatically increased by 1.5 million shares. The Company issues new shares of Class A common stock upon the exercise of stock options and the later of vesting or issuance of restricted stock (or restricted stock units).
Restricted Stock Units
Restricted Stock Activity
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company issued 0.1 million restricted stock units at a weighted average fair value (net of forfeitures) of less than $1.00 per share (excluding the impact of $0.2 million in additional expense related to modified restricted stock units) and will increase its additional paid-in capital by $0.3 million over the vesting period of the restricted stock units. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company issued 0.5 million restricted stock units (net of forfeitures) at a weighted average fair value of $12.05 and will increase its additional paid-in capital by $6.2 million over the vesting period of the restricted stock units. During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, 0.3 million units and 0.4 million units, respectively, of restricted stock were both vested and released.
As of March 31, 2009, there was $11.4 million of unamortized compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to unvested restricted stock units, which is expected to be amortized over a remaining weighted-average recognition period of 2.2 years.
A summary of the Companys outstanding restricted stock units as of March 31, 2009, and changes in restricted stock units during the three months ended March 31, 2009, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
Aggregate |
|
||
|
|
Number of |
|
Weighted- |
|
Average |
|
Intrinsic |
|
||
|
|
Restricted |
|
Average |
|
Remaining |
|
Value As Of |
|
||
|
|
Stock |
|
Purchase |
|
Contractual |
|
March 31, |
|
||
|
|
Units |
|
Price |
|
Term |
|
2009 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Restricted stock units outstanding as of December 31, 2008 |
|
1,421,985 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock units awarded |
|
266,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Restricted stock units released |
|
(289,523 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Restricted stock units forfeited |
|
(192,988 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Restricted stock units outstanding as of March 31, 2009 |
|
1,205,974 |
|
$ |
|
|
1.4 |
|
$ |
1,326,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Restricted stock units vested and expected to vest |
|
1,126,413 |
|
$ |
|
|
1.4 |
|
$ |
1,165,614 |
|
Restricted stock units exercisable (vested and deferred) |
|
66,764 |
|
$ |
|
|
0.0 |
|
$ |
73,440 |
|
Weighted average remaining recognition period in years |
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Units With Service And Market Conditions
During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, none of the Companys 0.1 million and 0.3 million restricted stock units with service and market conditions, respectively, vested, as the applicable milestones were not reached.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company modified 0.2 million restricted stock units with service and market conditions by eliminating the market conditions. Due to the modification, additional expense of $0.2 million will be recognized over the new vesting period of two years from the modification date.
9
Options
There were 1.1 million and 0.2 million options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. For options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and determined: (1) the term by using the simplified plain-vanilla method as allowed under Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 110; (2) a historical volatility over a period commensurate with the expected term, with the observation of the volatility on a daily basis; (3) a risk-free interest rate that was consistent with the expected term of the stock options and based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant; and (4) an annual dividend yield based upon the Companys most recent quarterly dividend per common share at the time of the grant.
The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||
|
|
March 31, |
|
||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
Expected life (years) |
|
6.3 |
|
6.3 |
|
Expected volatility factor (%) |
|
55% to 57% |
|
31% |
|
Risk-free interest rate (%) |
|
2.2% to 2.4% |
|
2.7% to 3.3% |
|
Expected dividend yield (%) |
|
0.0% |
|
12.3% to 14.6% |
|
No options were exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
The following table presents the option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
Intrinsic |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
Average |
|
Value |
|
||
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Remaining |
|
As of |
|
||
|
|
Number of |
|
Exercise |
|
Contractual |
|
March 31, |
|
||
|
|
Options |
|
Price |
|
Term |
|
2009 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Options outstanding as of December 31, 2008 |
|
2,493,930 |
|
$ |
28.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted |
|
1,059,250 |
|
$ |
1.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options forfeited |
|
(1,250 |
) |
$ |
27.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options expired |
|
(229,225 |
) |
$ |
21.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of March 31, 2009 |
|
3,322,705 |
|
$ |
20.21 |
|
6.9 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Options vested and expected to vest as of March 31, 2009 |
|
3,159,937 |
|
$ |
20.95 |
|
6.8 |
|
$ |
|
|
Options vested and exercisable as of March 31, 2009 |
|
1,705,861 |
|
$ |
32.34 |
|
4.5 |
|
$ |
|
|
Weighted average remaining recognition period in years |
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009, $1.4 million of accumulated unrecognized compensation costs related to unvested stock options, net of estimated forfeitures, is expected to be recognized in future periods over a weighted average period of 3.4 years.
10
The following table summarizes significant ranges of outstanding and exercisable options as of March 31, 2009:
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Number of |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Options |
|
Average |
|
Weighted |
|
Options |
|
Weighted |
|
||||||
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Remaining |
|
Average |
|
Exercisable |
|
Average |
|
||||||
|
|
at March 31, |
|
Contractual |
|
Exercise |
|
at March 31, |
|
Exercise |
|
||||||
Exercise Prices |
|
2009 |
|
Life |
|
Price |
|
2009 |
|
Price |
|
||||||
$ |
1.34 |
|
$ |
1.34 |
|
1,059,250 |
|
9.9 |
|
$ |
1.34 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
2.76 |
|
$ |
23.87 |
|
742,650 |
|
8.5 |
|
$ |
18.98 |
|
186,681 |
|
$ |
19.22 |
|
$ |
27.75 |
|
$ |
34.44 |
|
505,369 |
|
1.9 |
|
$ |
28.44 |
|
503,744 |
|
$ |
28.43 |
|
$ |
35.05 |
|
$ |
35.05 |
|
856,750 |
|
5.6 |
|
$ |
35.05 |
|
856,750 |
|
$ |
35.05 |
|
$ |
36.25 |
|
$ |
52.05 |
|
158,686 |
|
3.0 |
|
$ |
45.55 |
|
158,686 |
|
$ |
45.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,322,705 |
|
6.9 |
|
$ |
20.21 |
|
1,705,861 |
|
$ |
32.34 |
|
Recognized Non-Cash Compensation Expense
The following table summarizes stock-based compensation related to awards of restricted stock units, employee stock options and purchases under the employee stock purchase plan for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
|
|
(amounts in thousands) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Station operating expenses |
|
$ |
90 |
|
$ |
383 |
|
Corporate general and administrative expenses |
|
1,702 |
|
3,190 |
|
||
Stock-based compensation expense included in operating expenses |
|
1,792 |
|
3,573 |
|
||
Income tax benefit (net of a fully reserved valuation allowance adjustment in 2009) |
|
|
|
(1,240 |
) |
||
Total |
|
$ |
1,792 |
|
$ |
2,333 |
|
Tax Benefit, Or Additional Paid-In-Capital Pool
In connection with the vesting of restricted stock units issued under the Companys 2006 Option Exchange Program, the Company received tax deductions in excess of previously recorded tax benefits. As a result, the Company recorded a windfall tax benefit of $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008, which was classified as a financing cash inflow in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.
For the three months ended March 31, 2008, the Company utilized its paid-in-capital pool of $1.7 million in current and previously recorded tax benefits.
2009 Option Exchange Program
In February 2009, the Companys Board of Directors approved an amendment to the Plan to permit an option exchange program (OEP), which is subject to approval at the May 2009 shareholders meeting. The Company has offered (subject to shareholder approval of an amendment to the Plan) employees and non-employee directors the opportunity to make an election to exchange all of their outstanding stock options with exercise prices equal to or greater than $11.80 per share for a lesser number of shares of the Companys restricted stock units (RSU). The exchange ratio under the OEP is as follows:
Option |
|
Exchange Ratio |
|
Strike Price |
|
(Options For RSUs) |
|
At least $11.80, but less than $30.00 |
|
2.25 for 1 |
|
$30.00 or more |
|
4.5 for 1 |
|
As disclosed in the Companys Schedule TO, filed on April 13, 2009, the Company estimates that, based on data available as of March 31, 2009, approximately 2.2 million options would be eligible to be exchanged for
11
approximately 0.7 million restricted stock units, and the Company estimates that it will recognize additional non-cash compensation expense of approximately $0.3 million over the new vesting period of four years from the date of the exchange.
3. INTANGIBLE ASSETS AND GOODWILL
(A) Indefinite-Lived Intangibles
Under the provisions of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill and certain intangible assets are not amortized. Instead, these assets are reviewed at least annually for impairment and charged to results of operations only in the periods in which the recorded value of goodwill and certain intangibles is more than its fair value. The Company has determined that broadcasting licenses are deemed to have indefinite useful lives.
Change In Annual Testing Period For Broadcasting Licenses
The Company modified the period when it performs its annual broadcasting licenses impairment test from the first quarter of 2009 to the second quarter of 2009. With this change, the Company will perform its annual impairment test in the same quarter for both broadcasting licenses and goodwill. As a result of the interim test of broadcasting licenses that was performed during the fourth quarter of 2008, the annual test of broadcasting licenses in the second quarter of 2009 will not exceed one year since the test was last performed.
Broadcasting Licenses
The Company performs its broadcasting license impairment test by evaluating its broadcasting licenses for impairment at the market level using the direct method. Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 02-07 states that separately recorded indefinite-lived intangible assets should be combined into a single unit of accounting for purposes of testing impairment if they are operated as a single asset. The Company determines the fair value of the broadcasting licenses in each of its markets by relying on a discounted cash flow approach assuming a start-up scenario in which the only assets held by an investor are broadcasting licenses. The fair value contains assumptions incorporating variables that are based on past experiences and judgments about future performance using industry normalized information for an average station within a market. These variables for each unit of accounting would include, but not be limited to: (1) the forecast growth rate of each radio market, including population, household income, retail sales and other expenditures that would influence advertising expenditures; (2) market share and profit margin of an average station within a market; (3) estimated capital start-up costs and losses incurred during the early years; (4) risk-adjusted discount rate; (5) the likely media competition within the market area; and (6) terminal values.
During the first quarter of 2008, the Company completed the non-amortizing intangible asset impairment test for broadcasting licenses and determined that the fair value of the broadcasting licenses was equal to or greater than the amount reflected in the balance sheet for each of the Companys markets. Based upon the result of this asset impairment test, no impairment charges were recorded during the first quarter of 2008. Please refer to Note 14, Discontinued Operations, for a discussion of an impairment to broadcasting licenses in Rochester, New York during the first quarter of 2008.
The amount of unamortized broadcasting licenses reflected in the balance sheet as of March 31, 2009 was $768.6 million, which did not change from the amount reflected as of the year ended December 31, 2008. There were no events or circumstances during the first quarter of 2009 that indicated an interim review of broadcast licenses was required. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by the industry or the Company, or if events occur or circumstances change that would reduce the fair value of the Companys broadcasting licenses below the amount reflected in the balance sheet, the Company may be required to recognize impairment charges, which may be material, in future periods.
Goodwill
The Company performs its annual impairment test on its goodwill during the second quarter of each year by comparing the fair value for each reporting unit with the amount reflected on the balance sheet. The Company has determined that a radio market is a reporting unit. If the fair value for any reporting unit is less than the amount reflected in the balance sheet, an indication exists that the amount of goodwill attributed to a reporting unit may be impaired, and the Company is required to perform a second step of the impairment test. In the second step, the Company compares the implied fair value of the reporting units goodwill, determined by allocating the reporting
12
units fair value to all of its assets and liabilities in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation in accordance with SFAS No. 141, to the amount reflected in the balance sheet.
To determine the fair value, the Company uses an income or market approach for each reporting unit. The market approach compares recent sales and offering prices of similar properties. The income approach uses the subject propertys income generated over a specified time and capitalized at an appropriate market rate to arrive at an indication of the most probable selling price.
Please refer to Note 14, Discontinued Operations, for a discussion of an impairment to goodwill during the first quarter of 2008 related to the disposition of radio station assets in Rochester, New York.
The amount of goodwill reflected in the Companys balance sheet as of March 31, 2009 was $45.1 million, which did not change from the amount reflected as of the year ended December 31, 2008. There were no events or circumstances during the first quarter of 2009 that indicated an interim review of goodwill was required. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by the industry or the Company, or if events occur or circumstances change that would reduce the fair value of the Companys goodwill below the amount reflected in the balance sheet, the Company may be required to recognize impairment charges, which may be material, in future periods.
(B) Definite-Lived Intangibles
The Company has definite-lived intangible assets that consist of advertiser lists and customer relationships, acquired advertising contracts and income leases. These assets are amortized over the period for which the assets are expected to contribute to the Companys future cash flows and are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The amount of the amortization expense for definite-lived intangible assets was less than $0.1 million and $1.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. As of March 31, 2009, the Company reflected $0.9 million in unamortized definite-lived assets, which is included in deferred charges and other assets on the balance sheet.
The following is an estimate of the amortization expense for definite-lived assets, in thousands, for each of the succeeding years ending December 31:
|
|
Definite- |
|
|
|
|
Lived |
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Years ending December 31, |
|
|
|
|
2009 (excludes the three months ended March 31, 2009) |
|
108 |
|
|
2010 |
|
124 |
|
|
2011 |
|
83 |
|
|
2012 |
|
80 |
|
|
2013 |
|
53 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
893 |
|
4. ACQUISITIONS, DISPOSITIONS AND UNAUDITED PRO FORMA SUMMARY
Acquisitions And Dispositions For The Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
There were no acquisitions or dispositions during the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Acquisitions And Dispositions For The Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
Acquisition Of Three Stations In San Francisco, California, In Exchange For Four Stations In Cincinnati, Ohio, And Three Stations In Seattle, Washington
On March 14, 2008, the Company completed an exchange transaction with Bonneville International Corporation (Bonneville) to acquire three stations in San Francisco, California, and $1.0 million in cash in exchange for four radio stations in Cincinnati, Ohio, and three radio stations in Seattle, Washington. The fair value of the assets acquired, in exchange for the assets disposed, was accounted for under FAS No. 141, which resulted in a fair value of $220.0 million.
13
On February 26, 2007, the Company commenced operations of the San Francisco stations pursuant to a time brokerage agreement (TBA), and Bonneville commenced operations of the Cincinnati and Seattle stations pursuant to a TBA. During the period of the TBA, the Company: (1) included net revenues and station operating expenses associated with operating the San Francisco stations in the Companys financial statements; and (2) excluded net revenues and station operating expenses associated with operating the Cincinnati stations and three of the Seattle stations in the Companys financial statements. During the period subsequent to the acquisition in 2007 of the Cincinnati stations, there were no revenues or station operating expenses reported by the Company, as Bonneville operated these stations pursuant to a TBA.
As a result of the exchange transaction, the Company recorded $2.8 million of goodwill which is fully deductible for income tax purposes. The exchange transaction provided the Company with entry into the San Francisco market, where management believes it can increase the market share of the acquired stations. Upon completion of the transactions described herein, the Company: (1) owns and operates three stations in San Francisco; (2) continues to own and operate four radio stations in the Seattle market; and (3) exited the Cincinnati market. The Company reported a gain on sale or disposal of assets of $10.0 million, which was primarily attributable to the disposition of the three radio stations in the Seattle market.
The following is a summary of those radio stations that were included in the exchange:
Markets |
|
Radio Stations |
|
Transactions |
|
San Francisco, CA |
|
KDFC-FM; KBWF-FM; and KOIT-FM |
|
Company acquired from Bonneville |
|
Seattle, WA |
|
KBSG-FM; KIRO-AM; and KTTH-AM |
|
Company disposed to Bonneville |
|
Cincinnati, OH |
|
WKRQ-FM; WSWD-FM; WUBE-FM; and WYGY-FM |
|
Company disposed to Bonneville |
|
For the three radio stations acquired in San Francisco, the aggregate purchase price, including transaction costs of $0.4 million, was allocated as follows:
Description |
|
Amount |
|
Useful Lives |
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
$ |
1,919 |
|
7 years |
|
Furniture and equipment |
|
173 |
|
5 years |
|
|
Equipment |
|
2,032 |
|
3 to 5 years |
|
|
Total tangible assets |
|
4,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertiser lists and customer relationships |
|
56 |
|
3 years |
|
|
Acquired advertising contracts |
|
2,039 |
|
less than 1 year |
|
|
Broadcasting licenses |
|
210,358 |
|
non-amortizing |
|
|
Goodwill |
|
2,807 |
|
non-amortizing |
|
|
Total intangible assets |
|
215,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
219,384 |
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement liabilities |
|
(10 |
) |
7 years |
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
219,374 |
|
|
|
Disposition of A Station In Austin, Texas
On January 15, 2008, the Company sold the radio station assets of KLQB-FM, formerly KXBT-FM, in Austin, Texas, for $20.0 million in cash. The buyer had operated this station under a TBA since February 26, 2007. The Company believes that the divestiture of this station will not alter the competitive position of the remaining three stations the Company currently operates in this market. No gain or loss was reported on the sale.
As background on this disposition, on November 30, 2007, the Company purchased from CBS Radio Stations Inc. the assets of four radio stations serving the Austin radio market.
Unaudited Pro Forma Summary Of Financial Information
The following pro forma information presents the consolidated results of operations as if any acquisitions which occurred had all occurred as of the beginning of each period presented, after giving effect to certain
14
adjustments, including depreciation and amortization of assets and interest expense on any debt incurred to fund the acquisitions which would have been incurred had such acquisitions occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented. For purposes of this presentation, the data does not reflect on a pro forma basis dispositions of radio stations (other than the disposition to Bonneville of the radio stations in Seattle and Cincinnati as this disposition was in exchange for the assets as described under Note 4). In addition, the tables reflect, on a pro forma basis, information as if the discontinued operations in Rochester were not discontinued (see Note 14, Discontinued Operations). These unaudited pro forma results have been prepared for comparative purposes only and do not purport to be indicative of what would have occurred had the acquisitions been made as of that date or results which may occur in the future.
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
||||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
||||
|
|
(amounts in thousands, except |
|
||||
|
|
Actual |
|
Pro Forma |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Net revenues |
|
$ |
75,371 |
|
$ |
96,430 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
5,336 |
|
$ |
(4,922 |
) |
Net income (loss) per common share - basic and diluted |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
5. SENIOR DEBT
Bank Facility
In June 2007, the Company entered into a credit agreement (the Bank Facility) with a syndicate of banks (currently 19 banks) for a $1,050 million senior secured credit facility that matures in June 2012. The Bank Facility is comprised of $650 million in revolving credit (Revolver) and a $400 million term loan (Term A). The Company is required to make repayments of the Term A beginning September 2009 in quarterly amounts starting at $15 million and increasing to $60 million. The Bank Facility is secured by a pledge of 100% of the capital stock and other equity interest in all of the Companys wholly owned subsidiaries. The Bank Facility requires the Company to comply with certain financial covenants and leverage ratios which are defined terms within the agreement, including: (1) Consolidated Funded Indebtedness not to exceed 6 times Consolidated Operating Cash Flow; and (2) Consolidated Operating Cash Flow to be at a minimum of 2 times Consolidated Interest Charges.
As of March 31, 2009, the Company had $754.0 million, as well as a $1.5 million letter of credit, outstanding under the Bank Facility. Subject to covenant compliance at the time of each borrowing, the maximum amount available under the Revolver as of March 31, 2009 was $294.5 million. The amount available for borrowing is determined by the Companys financial covenants, which are impacted by many factors, including but not limited to changes in the Companys operating performance, acquisitions, dispositions and debt retirement. Assuming the use of the borrowed proceeds has no effect on Consolidated Operating Cash Flow (as determined under our Bank Facility), as of March 31, 2009, $89.2 million of the $294.5 million is available for borrowing. The Company believes it will be in compliance in 2009 with the financial covenants and other terms of the Companys Bank Facility and Senior Subordinated Notes (the Notes).
The current economic crisis has reduced demand for advertising in general, including advertising on the Companys radio stations. If the Companys revenues decline more than planned due to difficult market conditions, the Companys ability to maintain compliance with the financial covenants in its credit facilities would become increasingly difficult without additional remedial measures. Such remedial measures include managements plans to further reduce operating costs and opportunistically repurchase debt at a discount. If the Companys remedial measures were not successful in maintaining covenant compliance, then the Company would negotiate with its lenders for relief, which relief could result in higher interest expense. Failure to comply with the Companys financial covenants or other terms of the Bank Facility or Notes and failure to negotiate relief from its lenders could result in the acceleration of the maturity of all outstanding debt. Under these circumstances, the acceleration of the Companys debt could have a material adverse effect on the Companys business.
6. SENIOR SUBORDINATED NOTES
During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company repurchased $21.0 million and $30.9 million, respectively, of its 7.625% Senior Subordinated Notes due March 1, 2014. For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded in the statements of operations a gain on the extinguishment of
15
debt of $7.8 million and $1.8 million, respectively, net of write-offs of deferred financing costs of $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively. The Notes outstanding as of March 31, 2009 were $62.5 million. See Note 17, Subsequent Events, for repurchases subsequent to March 31, 2009.
7. DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
The Company from time to time enters into derivative financial instruments, including interest rate exchange agreements (Swaps) and interest rate collar agreements (Collars), to manage its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. Under a fixed rate Swap, the Company pays a fixed rate on a notional amount to a bank, and the bank pays to the Company a variable rate on the notional amount equal to the Companys Eurodollar borrowing rate. A Collar establishes two separate agreements: an upper limit or Cap and a lower limit or Floor for the Companys Eurodollar borrowing rate.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had outstanding the aggregate notional amounts of $550.0 million and $480.0 million, respectively, of cash flow (CF) interest rate transactions that were hedged against the Companys variable rate senior debt. During the three months ended March 31, 2008, a derivative rate hedging transaction with a notional amount of $30.0 million and an initial term of 10 years expired.
As of March 31, 2009, the Company had the following derivatives outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date That |
|
Notional |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
Amount |
|
||
Type of |
|
Notional |
|
Effective |
|
|
|
LIBOR |
|
|
Expiration |
|
Amount |
|
After |
|
||
Hedge |
|
Amount |
|
Date |
|
Collar |
|
Rate |
|
|
Date |
|
Decreases |
|
Decrease |
|
||
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Swap |
|
$ |
225.0 |
|
January 28, 2008 |
|
n/a |
|
3.03 |
% |
|
January 28, 2011 |
|
January 28, 2010 |
|
$ |
150.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Collar |
|
$ |
100.0 |
|
February 28, 2008 |
{ |
Cap |
|
4.00 |
% |
} |
February 28, 2011 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floor |
|
2.14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Swap |
|
$ |
125.0 |
|
March 28, 2008 |
|
n/a |
|
2.91 |
% |
|
September 28, 2011 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Swap |
|
$ |
100.0 |
|
May 28, 2008 |
|
n/a |
|
3.62 |
% |
|
May 28, 2012 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
|
The following is a summary of the fair value of the derivatives outstanding as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
Asset (Liability) |
|
||||
|
|
Location |
|
(amounts in thousands) |
|
||||
Designated Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest rate hedge transactions |
|
Other Assets |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest rate hedge transactions |
|
Other Liabilities |
|
$ |
(16,247 |
) |
$ |
(15,262 |
) |
Non-Designated Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Interest rate hedge transactions |
|
Other Assets |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest rate hedge transactions |
|
Other Liabilities |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
The fair value for derivative instruments of $16.2 million and $15.3 million as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, is included on the balance sheet in other long-term liabilities.
The Company does not expect to reclassify to the statement of operations within the next 12 months any portion of the amount outstanding as of March 31, 2009.
16
The following is a summary of the gains (losses) related to the Companys cash flow hedges for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
Amount Of |
|
Location Of |
|
Amount Of |
|
|
|
Amount Of |
|
|||||
Derivatives |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
Location Of |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|||||
Designated |
|
Recognized In |
|
Reclassified |
|
Reclassified |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
In Statement |
|
|||||
As A |
|
Other |
|
From OCI To |
|
From OCI To |
|
In Statement |
|
Of Operations |
|
|||||
Cash Flow |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Statement Of |
|
Statement Of |
|
Of |
|
Due To |
|
|||||
Hedge |
|
Income (OCI) |
|
Operations |
|
Operations |
|
Operations |
|
Ineffectiveness |
|
|||||
|
|
(amount in |
|
|
|
(amount in |
|
|
|
(amount in |
|
|||||
|
|
thousands) |
|
|
|
thousands) |
|
|
|
thousands) |
|
|||||
CF Interest Rate |
|
$ |
(985 |
) |
Interest Expense |
|
$ |
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
$ |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008 |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
Amount Of |
|
Location Of |
|
Amount Of |
|
|
|
Amount Of |
|
|||||
Derivatives |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
Location Of |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|||||
Designated |
|
Recognized In |
|
Reclassified |
|
Reclassified |
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
In Statement |
|
|||||
As A |
|
Other |
|
From OCI To |
|
From OCI To |
|
In Statement |
|
Of Operations |
|
|||||
Cash Flow |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Statement Of |
|
Statement Of |
|
Of |
|
Due To |
|
|||||
Hedge |
|
Income (OCI) |
|
Operations |
|
Operations |
|
Operations |
|
Ineffectiveness |
|
|||||
|
|
(amount in |
|
|
|
(amount in |
|
|
|
(amount in |
|
|||||
|
|
thousands) |
|
|
|
thousands) |
|
|
|
thousands) |
|
|||||
CF Interest Rate |
|
$ |
(2,833 |
) |
Interest Expense |
|
$ |
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
$ |
34 |
|
||
The following table presents the accumulated derivative gains (losses) recorded in the statement of comprehensive income (loss) as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
|
|
(amounts in thousands) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accumulated derivative unrealized loss |
|
$ |
(16,247 |
) |
$ |
(15,262 |
) |
Accounting For Derivative Instruments And Hedging Activities
The Company recognizes at fair value all derivatives, whether designated in hedging relationships or not, in the balance sheet as either assets or liabilities. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation. If the derivative is designated as a fair value hedge, the changes in the fair value of the derivative and the hedged item are recognized in the statement of operations. If the derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative are recorded in other comprehensive income and are recognized in the statement of operations when the hedged item affects net income. If a derivative does not qualify as a hedge, it is marked to fair value through the statement of operations. Any fees associated with these derivatives are amortized over their term. Under these derivatives, the differentials to be received or paid are recognized as an adjustment to interest expense over the life of the contract. In the event the cash flow hedges are terminated early, any amounts previously included in other comprehensive income (loss) would be reclassified as interest expense to the statement of operations as the forecasted transactions settles.
The Company formally documents all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes ongoing effectiveness assessments by relating all derivatives that are designated as fair value or cash flow hedges to specific assets and liabilities on the balance sheet or to specific firm commitments or forecasted transactions. The Companys derivative activities, all of which are for purposes other than trading, are initiated within the guidelines of corporate risk-management policies. The Company reviews the correlation and effectiveness of its derivatives on a periodic basis.
17
The fair value of these derivatives is determined under the provisions of SFAS No. 157 using observable market based inputs (a level two measurement) and the impact of credit risk on a derivatives fair value (the creditworthiness of the transactions counterparty for assets and the creditworthiness of the Company for liabilities).
8. CONTINGENCIES, GUARANTOR ARRANGEMENTS AND COMMITMENTS
Contingencies
The Company is subject to various outstanding claims which arise in the ordinary course of business and to other legal proceedings. In the opinion of management, any potential liability of the Company which may arise out of, or with respect to, these matters will not materially affect the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
The Company uses a combination of insurance and self-insurance mechanisms to provide for the potential liabilities for workers compensation, general liability, property, director and officers liability, vehicle liability and employee health care benefits. Liabilities associated with the risks that are retained by the Company are estimated, in part, by considering claims experience, demographic factors, severity factors, outside expertise and other actuarial assumptions. Under one of these policies, the Company is required to maintain a letter of credit in the amount of $1.5 million.
On January 25, 2007, a wrongful death suit was filed against the Company in the California Superior Court in Sacramento relating to an on-air contest. The lawsuit seeks various damages, which may not be fully covered by the Companys insurance policy. The FCC has also initiated an investigation into this contest. At this time, the Company cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings.
The Company could face increased costs in the form of fines and a greater risk that the Company could lose any one or more of its broadcasting licenses if the FCC concludes that programming broadcast by a Company station was obscene, indecent or profane and such conduct warrants license revocation. As of July 2007, the FCCs authority to impose a fine for the broadcast of such material was increased to $325,000 for a single incident, with a maximum fine of up to $3.0 million for a continuing violation. In the past, the FCC has issued Notices of Apparent Liability and a Forfeiture Order with respect to several of the Companys stations proposing fines for certain programming which the FCC deemed to have been indecent. These cases are the subject of pending administrative appeals. The FCC has also commenced several other investigations based on allegations received from the public that some of the Companys stations broadcast indecent programming. The Company has cooperated in these investigations, which remain pending. The Company estimates that the imposition of the proposed fines would not materially impact the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
The Company has filed on a timely basis renewal applications for those radio stations with radio broadcasting licenses that are subject to renewal with the FCC. The Companys costs to renew its licenses with the FCC are minimal and are expensed as incurred rather than capitalized. Certain licenses were not renewed prior to the renewal date, which is not unusual. The Company continues to operate these radio stations under their existing licenses until the licenses are renewed. The FCC may delay the renewal pending the resolution of open inquiries. The affected stations are, however, authorized to continue operations until the FCC acts upon the renewal application.
Guarantor Arrangements
The Company enters into indemnification agreements in the ordinary course of business and other agreements which include indemnification provisions. The Company believes the estimated fair value of these agreements is minimal and has not recorded liabilities for these agreements as of March 31, 2009.
Commitments
Termination Of Pending Disposition Of Radio Station In Portland, Oregon
In January 2009, the Company received $0.4 million as liquidated damages from a buyer as a result of the termination by the buyer of an asset purchase agreement and a TBA with the Company. On January 31, 2007, the Company entered into an agreement to sell KTRO-AM (formerly KKSN-AM) in Portland, Oregon, for $4.2 million in cash. Concurrently with entering into the agreement, the Company also entered into a TBA that was effective on February 1, 2007. On October 28, 2008, the Company received a notice from the buyer stating that it would not consummate the purchase transaction.
18
9. SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
Dividend Equivalents
The Companys grants of RSUs include the right, upon vesting, to receive a cash payment equal to the aggregate amount of dividends, if any, that a holder would have received on the shares of common stock underlying their RSU if such RSU had been vested during the period. For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company paid $0.7 million and $0.9 million, respectively, to the holders of restricted stock units that vested during these periods. The long-term dividend equivalent amount, accrued and unpaid on unvested restricted stock units, was $0.5 million and $1.1 million as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, and is included under other long-term liabilities in the balance sheet. The short-term dividend equivalent amount accrued and unpaid on unvested restricted stock units was $1.4 million and $1.6 million as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, and is included under other current liabilities in the balance sheet. The Company recognizes the tax benefit for income tax purposes as a reduction to its income tax expense (before any adjustment for a valuation allowance) rather than as an increase to its paid-in capital as all dividend equivalent payments are made to the restricted stockholders upon the later of vesting of the units or termination of the deferral period for previously vested units.
Repurchases Of Vested Restricted Stock Units
Upon vesting, unless an employee elects to pay the tax withholding obligation in cash, the Company withholds shares of stock in an amount sufficient to cover the employees tax withholding obligations. As a result, during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company was deemed to have repurchased 0.1 million shares of stock during each period.
Share Repurchase Programs
Under the Companys current share repurchase program, which expires on June 30, 2009, the Company has $25.4 million in remaining authorization for repurchases.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company repurchased 0.7 million shares in the amount of $0.9 million at an average price of $1.34 per share.
10. DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANS
The Company provides certain of its employees and the Board of Directors with an opportunity to defer a portion of their compensation on a tax-favored basis. The obligations by the Company to pay these benefits under these plans represent unsecured general obligations that rank equally with the Companys other unsecured indebtedness. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, $3.8 million and $3.7 million, respectively, were deferred under these plans and were included in other long-term liabilities. For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded a reduction to deferred compensation expense of $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively, which was allocated to corporate general and administrative expense and station operating expenses.
11. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
The effect of stock options and restricted stock units in the calculation of net income (loss) per share, using the treasury stock method, was dilutive for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
19
The following table sets forth the computations of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
(amounts in thousands, except share and per share data) |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Net Income |
|
Shares |
|
EPS |
|
Net Income |
|
Shares |
|
EPS |
|
||||
Basic net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
5,336 |
|
35,393,660 |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
$ |
9,169 |
|
37,635,517 |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,944 |
) |
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
5,336 |
|
35,393,660 |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
$ |
5,225 |
|
37,635,517 |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
Impact of options and restricted stock units |
|
|
|
88,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
100,546 |
|
|
|
||||
Diluted net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
5,336 |
|
35,482,330 |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
9,169 |
|
37,736,063 |
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,944 |
) |
|
|
(0.10 |
) |
||||
Net income |
|
$ |
5,336 |
|
35,482,330 |
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
$ |
5,225 |
|
37,736,063 |
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
In computing the incremental shares under the treasury stock method for the three months ended March 31, 2009, 1.2 million restricted stock units (including 0.1 million restricted stock units with market and service conditions as the market conditions were not satisfied as of March 31, 2009) and options to purchase 2.9 million shares of common stock at a range of $1.34 to $52.05, were excluded from the computation as they were anti-dilutive.
In computing the incremental shares under the treasury stock method for the three months ended March 31, 2008, 1.3 million restricted stock units (including 0.3 million restricted stock units with market and service conditions as the market conditions were not satisfied as of March 31, 2009) and options to purchase 2.4 million shares of common stock at a range of $11.41 to $52.05, were excluded from the computation as they were anti-dilutive.
12. INCOME TAXES
Effective Tax Rate - Overview
The Companys income tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was based on the estimated annual effective tax rate for 2009, which includes: (1) the effect of permanent differences between income subject to income tax for book and tax purposes; and (2) any discrete items of tax. The Companys effective tax rate, which can fluctuate from quarter to quarter, can be higher than the federal statutory rate of 35% primarily as a result of the provision for state taxes (net of a federal tax deduction).
The Companys effective income tax rate may be impacted by: (1) changes in the level of income in any of the Companys taxing jurisdictions; (2) changes in the statutes and rules applicable to taxable income in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates; (3) changes in the expected outcome of income tax audits; (4) changes in the estimate of expenses that are not deductible for tax purposes; (5) income taxes in certain states where the states current taxable income is dependent on factors other than the Companys consolidated net income; and (6) the effect of recording changes in the Companys liabilities for uncertain tax positions.
An impairment loss will result in an income tax benefit during the period incurred (before any adjustment for a deferred tax asset valuation allowance) as the amortization of broadcasting licenses and goodwill is deductible for income tax purposes.
Tax Rate For The Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
The effective income tax rate on income from continuing operations before income tax was 21.8% for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The effective income tax rate reflects a decrease in the deferred tax asset valuation allowance (after excluding net deferred tax liabilities associated with non amortizable assets such as broadcasting licenses and goodwill) for the reasons as described below under Valuation Allowance For Deferred Tax Assets. The decrease in the deferred tax asset valuation allowance was offset by certain discrete items of tax.
Tax Rate For The Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
The effective income tax rate on income from continuing operations before income taxes was 40.2% for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
20
Deferred Tax Liabilities
As of March 31, 2009 deferred tax liabilities were $1.4 million and as of December 31, 2008, there were no deferred tax liabilities as deferred tax liabilities were fully offset by deferred tax assets. The income tax accounting process to determine the deferred tax liabilities involves estimating all temporary differences between the tax and financial reporting bases of the Companys assets and liabilities, based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the period in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. The Company estimated the current exposure by assessing the temporary differences and computing the provision for income taxes by applying the estimated effective tax rate to income.
Valuation Allowance For Deferred Tax Assets
The Company decreased its valuation allowance by $2.7 million to $64.7 million as of March 31, 2009 from $67.4 million as of December 31, 2008 primarily as a result of a decrease in its deferred tax assets as of March 31, 2009 as compared to December 31, 2008. As a result of cumulative losses incurred by the Company since 2006, a deferred tax asset valuation allowance was established (after excluding net deferred tax liabilities associated with non amortizable assets such as broadcasting licenses and goodwill) due to the uncertainty that the deferred tax assets would be realized in future years. The valuation allowance as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 includes $6.4 million and $6.0 million, respectively, for an income tax benefit recorded in other comprehensive income (loss)
The Company has also considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax-planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance. On a quarterly basis, management assesses whether it remains more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized. In the event the Company determines at a future time that it could realize its deferred tax assets in excess of the net amount recorded, the Company will reduce its deferred tax asset valuation allowance and decrease income tax expense in the period when the Company makes such determination.
Income Tax Payments
The Company made income tax payments of $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and a marginal amount for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Liabilities For Uncertain Tax Positions
For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company recorded changes to its liabilities for uncertain tax positions to the statements of operations as income tax expense in each period of less than $0.1 million, which amounts consisted primarily of interest and penalties. The Companys liabilities for uncertain tax positions as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were $4.3 million for each period, which were recorded in the balance sheets as long-term tax liabilities. The Company reviews its estimates on a quarterly basis, and any change in its liabilities for uncertain tax positions will result in an adjustment to its income tax expense in the statement of operations in each period measured.
Federal And State Income Tax Audits
The Company is subject to federal and state income tax audits from time to time that could result in proposed assessments. The Company cannot predict with certainty how these audits will be resolved and whether the Company will be required to make additional tax payments, which may or may not include penalties and interest. The Company is currently under audit by the Internal Revenue Service for the tax years of 2004 through 2007. For most states where the Company conducts business, the Company is subject to examination for the preceding three to six years. In certain states, the period could be longer.
13. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AND RELATED ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
Accounts receivable are comprised primarily of advertising that has aired on the Companys radio stations, but for which payment has not been collected, net of agency commissions and an estimated allowance for doubtful accounts. Estimates of the allowance for doubtful accounts are recorded based on managements judgment of the collectibility of the accounts receivable based on historical information, relative improvements or deteriorations in the age of the accounts receivable and changes in current economic conditions.
21
The accounts receivable balances and reserve for doubtful accounts as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are presented in the following table:
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
|
|
(amounts in thousands) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
60,663 |
|
$ |
79,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
(3,182 |
) |
(4,476 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
$ |
57,481 |
|
$ |
75,354 |
|
As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company recorded accounts receivable credits in the amounts of $2.2 million and $1.9 million, respectively, which amounts are included in the balance sheets under other current liabilities.
As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company recorded: (1) short-term unearned revenues of $1.1 million and $1.4 million, respectively, which amounts are included in the balance sheets under other current liabilities; and (2) long-term unearned revenues of $0.5 million and $0.7 million, respectively, which amounts are included in the balance sheets under other long-term liabilities.
14. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
The Company applied the provisions of SFAS No. 144 to: (1) the disposition of radio broadcasting assets in the Rochester, New York, market on July 14, 2008 (for further discussion of this disposition, please refer to the Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 26, 2009); (2) the disposition of radio broadcasting assets in the Cincinnati, Ohio market on March 14, 2008 (see Note 4, Acquisitions, Dispositions And Unaudited Pro Forma Summary); and (3) the disposition of a radio station in Austin, Texas on January 15, 2008 (see Note 4, Acquisitions, Dispositions And Unaudited Pro Forma Summary). SFAS No. 144 requires that in a period in which a component of an entity has been disposed of or is classified as held for sale, the income statement of a business enterprise for current and prior periods shall report the results of operations of the component, including any gain or loss recognized, in discontinued operations.
The Company did not report as discontinued operations the disposition of the radio stations in Cincinnati, Ohio as there was no activity by the Company in the Cincinnati market since the Companys acquisition of four stations in the Cincinnati market during the fourth quarter of 2007, as Bonneville operated these stations pursuant to a TBA for the period from February 26, 2007 through March 14, 2008.
The Company did not report as discontinued operations the disposition of the radio station in the Austin market as this operation did not meet the criteria for the reclassification of operating results to discontinued operations due to the expected migration of cash flows from the disposed station to other Company-owned radio stations. Therefore, the results remain classified in income from continuing operations.
The Company did not allocate any interest expense for the periods presented, as no debt was required to be repaid under the Companys Bank Facility as a result of the disposition of these radio station assets.
22
Selected financial information related to discontinued operations in the Rochester market for the three months ended March 31, 2008 is as follows:
|
|
Three |
|
|
|
|
Months |
|
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
(amounts in |
|
|
|
|
thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net broadcast revenues |
|
$ |
1,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Station operating expenses |
|
1,023 |
|
|
Impairment loss |
|
6,675 |
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
7,698 |
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
(6,659 |
) |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
(2,715 |
) |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax benefit |
|
$ |
(3,944 |
) |
During the first quarter of 2008, the Company reviewed its carrying amount for the Rochester assets held for sale at that time and determined that an aggregate impairment loss for broadcasting licenses and goodwill of $6.7 million was necessary due to: (1) the continued decline in advertising revenues; (2) the filing of an application with the FCC to place these stations into a disposition trust; and (3) the potential for a forced sale by the disposition trustee.
15. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted FAS No. 157, which requires enhanced disclosures about assets and liabilities carried at fair value under FAS No. 157.
As defined in FAS No. 157, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The Company utilizes market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated or generally unobservable. The Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. FAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurement).
23
The following tables set forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the Companys financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Companys assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.
|
|
|
|
Value Measurements At Reporting |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
Date Using |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
In Active |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Markets For |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Identical |
|
Other |
|
Significant |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Assets Or |
|
Observable |
|
Unobservable |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, |
|
Liabilities |
|
Inputs |
|
Inputs |
|
||||
Description |
|
2009 |
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
(amounts in thousands) |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Available For Sale Securities |
|
$ |
1,392 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest Rate Cash Flow Hedges |
|
$ |
16,247 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
16,247 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value Measurements At Reporting |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
Date Using |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
In Active |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Markets For |
|
Significant |
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Identical |
|
Other |
|
Significant |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Assets Or |
|
Observable |
|
Unobservable |
|
||||
|
|
December 31, |
|
Liabilities |
|
Inputs |
|
Inputs |
|
||||
Description |
|
2008 |
|
(Level 1) |
|
(Level 2) |
|
(Level 3) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
(amounts in thousands) |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Available For Sale Securities |
|
$ |
1,399 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
1,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Interest Rate Cash Flow Hedges |
|
$ |
15,262 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
15,262 |
|
$ |
|
|
For available-for-sale securities, the Company uses quoted equity prices for identical assets and liabilities that are available in active markets (level 1). For the Companys interest rate hedges, the Company pays a fixed rate and receives a variable interest rate that is observable based upon a forward interest rate curve and is therefore considered a level 2 item.
24
For the Companys assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (level 3), the following amounts in thousands are a reconciliation of the activity during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
Available |
|
|
|
|
For Sale |
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,399 |
|
Proceeds from investments |
|
(7 |
) |
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
1,392 |
|
|
|
Available |
|
|
|
|
For Sale |
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,556 |
|
Purchases |
|
6 |
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,562 |
|
16. DEFERRED CHARGES AND OTHER ASSETS AND OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
Deferred charges and other assets, including definite-lived intangible assets, consist of the following:
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
|
||
|
|
(amounts in thousands) |
|
||||
Debt issuance costs, net |
|
$ |
5,132 |
|
$ |
5,775 |
|
Software costs, net |
|
2,156 |
|
2,455 |
|
||
Prepaid assets - long term |
|
1,400 |
|
1,600 |
|
||
Deferred contracts and other agreements, net |
|
819 |
|
857 |
|
||
Leasehold premium, net |
|
773 |
|
795 |
|
||
Deposits - long term |
|
353 |
|
|
|
||
Advertiser lists and customer relationships, net |
|
70 |
|
80 |
|
||
Other |
|
137 |
|
146 |
|
||
|
|
$ |
10,840 |
|
$ |
11,708 |
|
As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the deferred rent liabilities were $3.5 million and $3.4 million, respectively, and are included in other under long-term liabilities.
17. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Subsequent to March 31, 2009 and as of April 29, 2009, the Company repurchased in the open market $13.7 million of its 7.625% Senior Subordinated Notes due March 1, 2014 at a price of $7.1 million (see Note 6, Senior Subordinated Notes, for further discussion), resulting in $48.7 million outstanding as of April 29, 2009.
25
ITEM 2. Managements Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations
In preparing the discussion and analysis contained in this Item 2, we presume that readers have read or have access to the discussion and analysis contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on February 26, 2009. In addition, you should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report. The following results of operations include a discussion of the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008. Our results of operations during the relevant periods represent the operations of the radio stations: (1) owned and operated by us; (2) operated by us pursuant to time brokerage agreements (TBAs); and (3) exclude those owned by us but operated by others pursuant to TBAs.
We discuss net revenues, station operating expenses and operating income by comparing the performance of stations owned or operated by us throughout a relevant period to the performance of those same stations in the prior period whether or not owned or operated by us. We use these comparisons to assess the performance of our operations by analyzing the effect of acquisitions and dispositions of stations on net revenues and station operating expenses throughout the periods measured.
Results of Operations
The following significant factors affected our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008:
Acquisitions
· On March 14, 2008, we acquired three radio stations in San Francisco, California from Bonneville International Corporation (Bonneville) that in 2009 increased our depreciation and amortization expense.
Dispositions
· On July 14, 2008, we sold three of our eight Rochester, New York, radio stations, which the buyer began operating on May 1, 2008 under a TBA with us, for net cash proceeds of $12.2 million. The results for these stations were recognized as discontinued operations.
· On March 14, 2008, we sold to Bonneville three of our seven Seattle, Washington, radio stations and recognized a gain of $10.0 million on the disposition of these assets.
· On January 15, 2008, we sold an Austin, Texas radio station for $20.0 million in cash.
Financing
· Our interest expense decreased due to: (1) a decrease in interest rates; (2) a decrease in our outstanding debt; and (3) the redemption of a portion of our Senior Subordinated Notes that had a higher interest rate than the rate under our senior debt.
· During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we repurchased $21.0 million of Senior Subordinated Notes and recognized a net gain on extinguishment of debt of $7.8 million (net of deferred financing expenses). During the three months ended March 31, 2008, we repurchased $30.9 million of Senior Subordinated Notes and recognized a gain on extinguishment of debt of $2.2 million.
Other
· Since the third quarter of 2008, we increased the valuation allowance for our net deferred tax assets (after excluding net deferred tax liabilities associated with non amortizable assets such as broadcasting licenses and goodwill) due to the cumulative losses incurred by us since 2006, which caused uncertainty as to the realization of the deferred tax assets in future years.
26
· During the first quarter of 2008, we reviewed our carrying amount for the Rochester assets then held for sale and determined that an impairment loss of $6.7 million was necessary as a result of the status of our then ongoing divestiture process.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 As Compared To The Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
Net Revenues:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
||
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
||||
Net Revenues |
|
$ |
75.4 |
|
$ |
95.4 |
|
Amount of Change |
|
$ |
(20.0 |
) |
|
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
(21.0 |
)% |
|
|
||
Our decrease in net revenues was impacted by the current economic downturn that contributed to weak demand for advertising in general. Net revenues declined in most of the markets where we operate stations. Those radio stations that were most significantly impacted by the decline in net revenues were radio stations located in Boston, Portland, San Francisco and Seattle. Management anticipates that the negative trend in radio industry revenues will continue for the next several quarters but we expect to see lower levels of decline in the second half of 2009.
Station Operating Expenses:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
||
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
||||
Station Operating Expenses |
|
$ |
58.6 |
|
$ |
64.1 |
|
Amount of Change |
|
$ |
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
(8.6 |
)% |
|
|
||
The decrease in station operating expenses was primarily due to: (1) the factors leading to the decrease in net revenues as described above as certain variable expenses decrease with a corresponding decrease in net revenues; and (2) certain cost reduction initiatives that commenced during the fourth quarter of 2008, such as headcount reduction and the elimination of a 401K employer matching contribution. Management anticipates that the trend of declining station operating expenses will continue for the next several quarters as we realize the effects of previously implemented cost cutting measures together with the decline in variable station operating expenses.
Depreciation And Amortization Expenses:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
||
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
||||
Depreciation and Amortization Expenses |
|
$ |
4.3 |
|
$ |
6.0 |
|
Amount of Change |
|
$ |
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
(28.3 |
)% |
|
|
||
Depreciation and amortization expense decreased as the prior year was impacted by acquisitions during the fourth quarter of 2007, which included certain amortizable assets with lives of a short duration.
Corporate General And Administrative Expenses:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
||
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
||||
Corporate General and Administrative Expenses |
|
$ |
5.7 |
|
$ |
8.3 |
|
Amount of Change |
|
$ |
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
(31.3 |
)% |
|
|
||
27
Corporate general and administrative expenses decreased primarily due to: (1) a decrease in non-cash compensation expense of $1.5 million as a result of a decrease in the fair value of equity awards issued; (2) a decrease in legal expense of $0.4 million associated with certain legal proceedings during 2008 which did not reoccur in 2009; and (3) a decrease in deferred compensation expense of $0.3 million as a result of a decrease in the value of the unfunded obligation.
Operating Income:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
||
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
||||
Operating Income |
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
$ |
27.1 |
|
Amount of Change |
|
$ |
(20.3 |
) |
|
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
(74.9 |
)% |
|
|
||
The decrease in operating income was primarily due to: (1) a decrease in net revenues for the reasons as described above under Net Revenues; and (2) a decrease in net gain on sale or disposal of assets of $10.0 million as a result of the sale in 2008 of our Seattle stations. This decrease was offset by: (i) a decrease in station operating expenses for the reasons as described above under Station Operating Expenses; and (ii) a decrease in corporate general and administrative expenses for the reasons as described above under Corporate General And Administrative Expenses.
Interest Expense:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
||
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
||||
Interest Expense |
|
$ |
8.1 |
|
$ |
13.6 |
|
Amount of Change |
|
$ |
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
(40.4 |
)% |
|
|
||
The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to: (1) a decrease in interest rates on outstanding debt during the three months ended March 31, 2009 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2008; (2) a decline in outstanding debt upon which interest is computed; and (3) the repurchase of our Senior Subordinated Notes, which have a higher interest rate than the replacement debt.
Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
||
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
||||
Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes |
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
$ |
15.3 |
|
Amount of Change |
|
$ |
(8.5 |
) |
|
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
(55.6 |
)% |
|
|
||
The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in operating income for the reasons as described above under Operating Income. This decrease was offset by: (1) a $6.0 million increase on gain on the retirement of our Senior Subordinated Notes as we repurchased debt at a higher discount; and (2) a decrease in our interest expense of $5.5 million for the reasons described above under Interest Expense.
Income Taxes:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
||
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
||||
Income Taxes |
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
Amount of Change |
|
$ |
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
(75.8 |
)% |
|
|
||
28
Income taxes decreased primarily due to: (1) a decrease in income from continuing operations before income taxes subject to tax; and (2) a decrease in our valuation allowance as our deferred tax assets subject to a valuation allowance (after excluding net deferred tax liabilities associated with non amortizable assets such as broadcasting licenses and goodwill) decreased.
Loss From Discontinued Operations, Net Of Income Tax Benefit:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
||
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
||||
Loss from Discontinued Operations, Net Of Income Tax Benefit |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
Amount of Change |
|
$ |
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
(100.0 |
)% |
|
|
||
The net change was primarily due to a non-cash impairment loss of $6.7 million (before income tax benefit) in the first quarter of 2008 for the Rochester assets that were held for sale and that were subsequently disposed of during the third quarter of 2008.
Net Income:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
||||
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
||
|
|
(dollars in millions) |
|
||||
Net Income |
|
$ |
8.6 |
|
$ |
5.2 |
|
Amount of Change |
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
Percentage Change |
|
65.4 |
% |
|
|
||
The net change was primarily attributable to the reasons described above under Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes; Income Taxes; and Loss From Discontinued Operations, Net Of Income Tax Benefit.
Future Impairments
We may determine that it will be necessary to take impairment charges in future periods if the economic downturn worsens and/or continues for an extended period of time,. The annual impairment test of our broadcasting licenses and goodwill will be performed in the second quarter of 2009.
Liquidity And Capital Resources
Our Credit Agreement
Our credit agreement (the Bank Facility), currently with a syndicate of 19 banks, provides for $1,050 million in senior secured credit that matures on June 30, 2012, which is comprised of $650 million in revolving credit (Revolver) and $400 million in a term loan (Term A). The Term A reduces beginning September 30, 2009 in quarterly amounts starting at $15 million and increasing to $60 million. The Revolver provides us with working capital and for general corporate purposes, including capital expenditures and any or all of the following: repurchases of our Senior Subordinated Notes, repurchases of Class A common stock, dividends and acquisitions. The Bank Facility is secured by a pledge of 100% of the capital stock and other equity interest in all of our wholly owned subsidiaries. The Bank Facility requires us to comply with certain financial covenants and leverage ratios which are defined terms within the agreement, including: (1) Consolidated Funded Indebtedness not to exceed 6 times Consolidated Operating Cash Flow; and (2) Consolidated Operating Cash Flow to be at a minimum of 2 times Consolidated Interest Charges. Management believes we are in compliance with the financial covenants and all other terms of the Bank Facility.
Liquidity
As of March 31, 2009, $294.5 million was the maximum amount available under the Bank Facility. The amount available for borrowing is determined by our financial covenants, which are impacted by many factors, including but not limited to changes in our operating performance, acquisitions, dispositions and debt retirement. Assuming the use of the borrowed proceeds has no effect on Consolidated Operating Cash Flow (as determined
29
under our Bank Facility), as of March 31, 2009, $89.2 million of the $294.5 million is available for borrowing as a result of our Bank Facilitys leverage ratio covenant.
As of March 31, 2009, we had $9.1 million in cash and cash equivalents. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we decreased our net outstanding debt by $17.0 million (which includes a discount of $8.0 million on the retirement of our senior subordinated debt). As of March 31, 2009, we had outstanding $818.1 million in senior debt, including: (1) $754.0 million under our Bank Facility; (2) $62.5 million in Senior Subordinated Notes; and (3) $1.5 million in a letter of credit.
We may seek to obtain other funding or additional financing from time to time. We believe that cash on hand and cash from operating activities, together with available borrowings under the Bank Facility, will be sufficient to permit us to meet our liquidity requirements. Our lenders require that we remain in compliance with certain covenants in our credit agreements. We believe that in 2009 we will maintain our compliance with these covenants.
The current economic crisis has reduced demand for advertising in general, including advertising on our radio stations. Management anticipates that the negative trends in radio industry revenues will continue for the next several quarters but we expect to see lower levels of decline in the second half of 2009. If our revenues decline more than planned due to difficult market conditions, our ability to maintain compliance with the financial covenants in our credit agreements would become increasingly difficult without additional remedial measures. Such remedial measures include managements plans to further reduce operating costs and opportunistically repurchase debt at a discount. If our remedial measures were not successful in maintaining covenant compliance, then we would negotiate with our lenders for relief, which relief could result in higher interest expense. Failure to comply with our financial covenants or other terms of our credit agreements and failure to negotiate relief from our lenders could result in the acceleration of the maturity of all outstanding debt. Under these circumstances, the acceleration of our debt could have a material adverse effect on our business.
NYSE Continued Listing
Our common stock is currently listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). The continued listing requirements of the NYSE include, among other things: (i) a minimum share closing price of $1.00 over a thirty consecutive day trading period; (ii) a minimum market capitalization of $25 million over a thirty consecutive day trading period; and (iii) a minimum of either $75 million in market capitalization or $75 million of shareholders equity.
On December 1, 2008, we received notice from the NYSE that we were not in compliance with the minimum share closing price requirement. Pursuant to NYSE rules, we advised the NYSE that we intended to cure this deficiency within the applicable six-month cure period. On January 22, 2009, however, the NYSE announced limited and temporary relief of its continued listing standards through April 22, 2009. This relief also provided a mechanism for listed companies to cure any then existing deficiency prior to the end of the cure periods otherwise available under the NYSEs rules.
On April 3, 2009, the NYSE notified us that we regained compliance with the NYSE continued listing standards.
While we are presently in compliance with NYSE continued listing requirements, it is possible our common stock may in the future be subject to suspension and delisting procedures.
Operating Activities
Net cash flows provided by operating activities were $15.9 million and $18.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease in 2009 was mainly attributable to a decrease in net revenues of $20.0 million, offset by an increase in working capital provided of $6.7 million, primarily due to a $3.0 million increase in working capital provided from accounts receivable.
Investing Activities
Net cash flows used in investing activities were $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and net cash flows provided by investing activities were $21.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the cash used in investing activities primarily reflects $0.8 million for additions to property and equipment. For the three months ended March 31, 2008, the cash provided by
30
investing activities primarily reflects $20.0 million in proceeds from the sale of a station in Austin, offset by cash used in investing activities for the additions to property and equipment of $3.0 million.
Financing Activities
Net cash flows used in financing activities were $10.7 million and $46.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the cash flows used in financing activities primarily reflect the repurchase of our Senior Subordinated Notes at $13.0 million (after a discount of $8.0 million). For the three months ended March 31, 2008, the cash flows used in financing activities primarily reflect the repurchase of our Senior Subordinated Notes of $28.7 million (after a discount of $2.2 million) and the payment of dividends of $14.3 million.
Dividends
Our Board of Directors, which approved dividends on a quarterly basis effective with the first quarter of 2006 through the third quarter of 2008, suspended further dividends effective beginning with the fourth quarter of 2008. Any future dividends will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors based upon the relevant factors at the time of such consideration.
Share Repurchase Programs
Under the Companys share repurchase program, which expires on June 30, 2009, the Company has $25.4 million in remaining authorization for repurchases.
Debt Repurchases
We may from time to time seek to repurchase and retire our outstanding debt through cash purchases, open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material. During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we repurchased and retired $21.0 million of our Senior Subordinated Notes.
Income Taxes
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we paid $0.1 million in income taxes. We anticipate that it will not be necessary to make any quarterly estimated federal and most state income tax payments for the remainder of 2009 based upon existing prepayments and expected quarterly taxable income for the remainder of 2009.
Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures for the three months ended March 31, 2009 were $0.8 million. We anticipate that capital expenditures in 2009 will be between $3.0 million and $4.0 million.
Contractual Obligations
The following table reflects a summary as of March 31, 2009 of our contractual obligations for the remainder of the year 2009 and thereafter:
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
1 to 3 |
|
3 to 5 |
|
More Than 5 |
|
|||||
Contractual Obligations: |
|
Total |
|
1 year |
|
years |
|
years |
|
years |
|
|||||
|
|
(amounts in thousands) |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
Long-term debt obligations (1) |
|
$ |
900,479 |
|
$ |
52,136 |
|
$ |
296,807 |
|
$ |
488,236 |
|
$ |
63,300 |
|
Operating lease obligations |
|
68,770 |
|
8,990 |
|
21,002 |
|
15,090 |
|
23,688 |
|
|||||
Purchase obligations (2) |
|
281,574 |
|
70,701 |
|
97,202 |
|
60,777 |
|
52,894 |
|
|||||
Other long-term liabilities (3) |
|
31,425 |
|
455 |
|
12,696 |
|
6,007 |
|
12,267 |
|
|||||
Total |
|
$ |
1,282,248 |
|
$ |
132,282 |
|
$ |
427,707 |
|
$ |
570,110 |
|
$ |
152,149 |
|
31
(1) |
(a) |
Our Bank Facility had outstanding debt in the amount of $754.0 million as of March 31, 2009. The maturity under our Bank Facility could be accelerated if we do not maintain certain covenants. |
|
||
|
(b) |
Under our 7.625% Senior Subordinated Notes, the maturity could be accelerated if we do not maintain certain covenants or could be repaid in cash by us at our option prior to the due date of the notes. |
|
||
|
(c) |
The above table includes projected interest expense under the remaining term of our Bank Facility and our 7.625% Senior Subordinated Notes. |
|
||
(2) |
(a) |
We have $1.6 million in liabilities primarily related to: (i) our obligation to provide a letter of credit; and (ii) construction obligations. |
|
||
|
(b) |
In addition to the above, purchase obligations of $280.0 million include contracts primarily for on-air personalities, sports programming rights, ratings services, music licensing fees, equipment maintenance and certain other operating contracts. |
|
||
(3) |
|
Included within total other long-term liabilities of $31.4 million are deferred tax liabilities and liabilities for unrecognized tax positions of $5.7 million, which have been reflected in the above table in the column labeled as More Than 5 Years as it is impractical to determine whether there will be a cash impact to an individual year. See Note 12, Income Taxes, in the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of deferred tax liabilities, including liabilities for unrecognized tax positions. |
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
FIN 46R was not applicable as of March 31, 2009 as we had no pending transactions to acquire or dispose of radio station assets. As of March 31, 2009, we had no other off-balance sheet arrangements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 to the accompanying financial statements, Basis Of Presentation - New Accounting Pronouncements, for a discussion of the status and potential impact of new accounting pronouncements.
Critical Accounting Policies
The SEC defines critical accounting policies as those that are most important to the portrayal of a companys financial condition and results and that require managements most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.
There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies from the information provided in Part II, Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, under the heading Critical Accounting Policies in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. We have, however, provided additional disclosures to one of our critical accounting policies for impairment testing of radio broadcasting licenses and goodwill.
Radio Broadcasting Licenses And Goodwill
We have made acquisitions in the past for which a significant amount of the purchase price was allocated to broadcasting licenses and goodwill assets. As of March 31, 2009, we have recorded approximately $813.7 million in radio broadcasting licenses and goodwill, which represents 82.9% of our total assets at that date. We must conduct impairment testing at least annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired as required by SFAS No. 142, and charge to operations an impairment expense only in the periods in which the recorded value of these assets is more than their fair value. After an impairment expense is recognized, the recorded value of these assets will be reduced by the impairment expense amount recognized and this shall be the assets new accounting basis. In 2008, we recorded an impairment loss of $835.7 million for radio broadcasting licenses and goodwill. We believe our estimate of the value of our radio broadcasting licenses and goodwill assets is a critical accounting estimate as the value is significant in relation to our total assets, and our estimate of the value uses assumptions that incorporate variables based on past experiences and judgments about future performance of our stations. These variables include but are not limited to: (1) the forecast growth rate of each radio market, including population, household income, retail sales and other expenditures that would influence advertising expenditures; (2) market share and profit margin of an average station within a market; (3) estimated capital start-up costs and losses incurred during the early years; (4) risk-adjusted discount rate; (5) the likely media competition within the market area; and (6) terminal values. Changes in our estimates of the fair value of these assets could result in material future period write-downs in the carrying value of our broadcasting licenses and goodwill assets. Please refer to Note 3, Intangible Assets And Goodwill, in the accompanying notes to the financial statements included in the Annual Report on Form
32
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 that was filed on February 26, 2009, for a discussion of several key assumptions used in the fair value estimate of our broadcasting licenses and goodwill during our fourth quarter 2008 interim impairment test.
If we were to assume a 100 basis point change in certain of our key assumptions used to determine the fair value of our broadcasting licenses during the fourth quarter of 2008, the following would be the impact:
· A decrease in the long-term growth rate by 100 basis points would result in an impairment of $76.1 million.
· A decrease in the margin by 100 basis points for measuring a radio stations operating performance would result in an impairment of $23.3 million.
· An increase in the cost of capital by 100 basis points would result in an impairment of $105.0 million.
If we were to assume the same 100 basis point change in certain of our key assumptions used to determine the fair value of goodwill as we did to determine the fair value for broadcasting licenses (as described above), then there would be no change to the carrying value of goodwill as the implied amount of goodwill after determining the enterprise value would increase due to the decrease in the value of the broadcasting licenses.
For a more comprehensive list of our accounting policies, please see Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies, accompanying the consolidated financial statements included in our latest annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included with Form 10-K contains several other policies, including policies governing the timing of revenue recognition, that are important to the preparation of our consolidated financial statements, but do not meet the SECs definition of critical accounting policies because they do not involve subjective or complex judgments. In addition, for further discussion of new accounting policies that were effective for us on January 1, 2009, please refer to the new accounting pronouncements under Note 1 to the accompanying notes to the financial statements.
ITEM 3. Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates on our variable rate senior debt. From time to time, we may seek to limit our exposure to interest rate volatility through the use of derivative rate hedging instruments. If the borrowing rates under LIBOR were to increase 1% above the current rates as of March 31, 2009, our interest expense on our senior debt would increase by approximately $2.0 million on an annual basis, including any interest benefit or interest expense associated with the use of derivative rate hedging instruments as described below. We do not have interest rate risk related to our Senior Subordinated Notes, which have a fixed interest rate of 7.625%.
The following derivative rate hedging transactions, which fix interest on our variable rate debt, are outstanding as of March 31, 2009 in the aggregate notional amount of $550.0 million. These rate hedging transactions are tied to the one-month LIBOR interest rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective |
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date That |
|
Notional |
|
||
Type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed |
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
Amount |
|
||
of |
|
Notional |
|
Effective |
|
|
|
|
|
LIBOR |
|
|
|
Expiration |
|
Amount |
|
After |
|
||
Hedge |
|
Amount |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Collar |
|
Rate |
|
|
|
Date |
|
Decreases |
|
Decrease |
|
||
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Swap |
|
$ |
225.0 |
|
Jan. 28, 2008 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
3.03 |
% |
|
|
Jan. 28, 2011 |
|
Jan. 28, 2010 |
|
$ |
150.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Collar |
|
$ |
100.0 |
|
Feb. 28, 2008 |
|
{ |
|
Cap
Floor |
|
4.00
2.14 |
%
% |
} |
|
Feb. 28, 2011 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Swap |
|
$ |
125.0 |
|
March 28, 2008 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
2.91 |
% |
|
|
Sept. 28, 2011 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Swap |
|
$ |
100.0 |
|
May 28, 2008 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
3.62 |
% |
|
|
May 28, 2012 |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
|
The fair value (based upon current market rates) of the rate hedging transactions is included as derivative instruments in long-term assets and/or liabilities as the maturity dates on these instruments are greater than one year.
33
The fair value of the hedging transaction is affected by a combination of several factors, including the change in the one-month LIBOR rate and the forward interest rate to maturity. Any increase in the one-month LIBOR rate and/or the forward interest rate to maturity results in a more favorable valuation, while any decrease in the one-month LIBOR rate and/or forward interest rate to maturity results in a less favorable valuation. Our credit exposure under these hedging agreements, or similar agreements we may enter into in the future, is the cost of replacing an agreement in the event of non-performance by our counter-party. As of March 31, 2009, our derivative instrument was a liability of $16.2 million, which represented an increase of $1.0 million from the balance as of December 31, 2008. The increase in liability was primarily due to a decrease in the forward interest rates to maturity, offset by a reduction in the remaining term of the hedging transactions. The liability as of March 31, 2009 included a reduction in value for non-performance in accordance with the fair value provisions of SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurement, that was effective for us as of January 1, 2008.
Our cash equivalents are money market instruments consisting of short-term government securities and repurchase agreements that are fully collateralized by government securities. We do not believe that we have any material credit exposure with respect to these assets.
Our credit exposure related to our accounts receivable does not represent a significant concentration of credit risk due to the quantity of advertisers, the minimal reliance on any one advertiser, the multiple markets in which we operate and the wide variety of advertising business sectors.
See also additional disclosures regarding liquidity and capital resources made under Liquidity and Capital Resources in Part 1, Item 2 above.
ITEM 4. Controls And Procedures
Evaluation Of Controls And Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that: (i) information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms; and (ii) such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and our management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, our President/Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President - Operations/Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.
Changes In Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
34
OTHER INFORMATION
There have been no material developments relating to the legal proceedings described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 26, 2009.
There have been no material changes from the Risk Factors described in our Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on February 26, 2009.
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales Of Equity Securities And Use Of Proceeds
During the three-month period ending March 31, 2009, we repurchased $0.7 million of our Class A common stock pursuant to a $100 million share repurchase program adopted by our Board of Directors on May 8, 2006. This share repurchase program was extended on May 3, 2007 and on April 23, 2008 and is due to expire on June 30, 2009.
During the three-month period ending March 31, 2009, there were elections by employees to withhold shares of stock upon vesting of restricted stock units to cover withholding tax obligations. The following table provides information on our repurchases during the three months ended March 31, 2009:
Period |
|
(a) |
|
(b) |
|
(c) |
|
(d) |
|
||
January 1, 2009 - January 31, 2009 (1) (2) |
|
443,121 |
|
$ |
1.31 |
|
442,609 |
|
$ |
25,689,578 |
|
February 1, 2009 - February 29, 2009 (1) (2) |
|
240,353 |
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
220,055 |
|
$ |
25,381,272 |
|
March 1, 2009 - March 31, 2009 (1) (2) |
|
58,037 |
|
$ |
1.03 |
|
|
|
$ |
25,381,272 |
|
Total |
|
741,511 |
|
|
|
662,664 |
|
|
|
(1) On April 23, 2008, our Board of Directors extended to June 30, 2009 a plan to repurchase up to $100 million of our common stock that was due to expire on May 5, 2008.
(2) In connection with employee tax obligations related to the vesting of restricted stock units during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and in accordance with elections by certain employees, we are deemed to have purchased the shares withheld to satisfy employees tax obligations of 512 shares at an average price of $1.19 per share in January 2009, 20,298 shares at an average price of $1.35 per share in February 2009 and 58,037 shares at an average price of $1.03 per share in March 2009. These shares are included in the above table.
ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
ITEM 4. Submission Of Matters To A Vote Of Security Holders
None.
None.
35
Exhibit |
|
Description |
3.01 |
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Entercom Communications Corp. as further amended on December 19, 2007. (1) |
3.02 |
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Entercom Communications Corp. (2) |
4.01 |
|
Indenture dated as of March 5, 2002 by and among Entercom Radio, LLC and Entercom Capital, Inc., as co-issuers, the Guarantors named therein and HSBC Bank USA, as trustee. (3) (Originally filed as Exhibit 4.02) |
4.02 |
|
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 5, 2002 by and among Entercom Radio, LLC and Entercom Capital, Inc., as co-issuers, the Guarantors named therein and HSBC Bank USA, as trustee. (3) (Originally filed as Exhibit 4.03) |
10.01 |
|
2009 Waiver of Scheduled CPI Salary Increase between Entercom Communications Corp. and David J. Field dated January 20, 2009. (4) |
10.02 |
|
2009 Waiver of Scheduled CPI Salary Increase between Entercom Communications Corp. and Stephen F. Fisher dated January 20, 2009. (4) |
10.03 |
|
2009 Waiver of Scheduled CPI Salary Increase between Entercom Communications Corp. and John C. Donlevie dated January 20, 2009. (4) |
31.01 |
|
Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a), as created by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (4) |
31.02 |
|
Certification of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a), as created by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (4) |
32.01 |
|
Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (5) |
32.02 |
|
Certification of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (5) |
(1) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 of our Amendment to Registration Statement on Form S-1, as filed on January 27, 1999 (File No. 333-61381) and Exhibit 3.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K as filed on December 21, 2007.
(2) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K as filed on February 21, 2008.
(3) Incorporated by reference to an exhibit of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002, as filed on May 13, 2002.
(4) Filed herewith.
(5) These exhibits are submitted herewith as accompanying this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and shall not be deemed to be filed as part of such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
36
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
ENTERCOM
COMMUNICATIONS CORP. |
|
|
|
|
Date: May 11, 2009 |
/S/ David J. Field |
|
Name: David J. Field |
|
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
(principal executive officer) |
|
|
|
|
Date: May 11, 2009 |
/S/ Stephen F. Fisher |
|
Name: Stephen F. Fisher |
|
Title: Executive Vice President - Operations and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) |
37
Exhibit |
|
Description |
3.01 |
|
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Entercom Communications Corp. as further amended on December 19, 2007. (1) |
3.02 |
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Entercom Communications Corp. (2) |
4.01 |
|
Indenture dated as of March 5, 2002 by and among Entercom Radio, LLC and Entercom Capital, Inc., as co-issuers, the Guarantors named therein and HSBC Bank USA, as trustee. (3) (Originally filed as Exhibit 4.02) |
4.02 |
|
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 5, 2002 by and among Entercom Radio, LLC and Entercom Capital, Inc., as co-issuers, the Guarantors named therein and HSBC Bank USA, as trustee. (3) (Originally filed as Exhibit 4.03) |
10.01 |
|
2009 Waiver of Scheduled CPI Salary Increase between Entercom Communications Corp. and David J. Field dated January 20, 2009. (4) |
10.02 |
|
2009 Waiver of Scheduled CPI Salary Increase between Entercom Communications Corp. and Stephen F. Fisher dated January 20, 2009. (4) |
10.03 |
|
2009 Waiver of Scheduled CPI Salary Increase between Entercom Communications Corp. and John C. Donlevie dated January 20, 2009. (4) |
31.01 |
|
Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a), as created by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (4) |
31.02 |
|
Certification of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a), as created by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (4) |
32.01 |
|
Certification of President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (5) |
32.02 |
|
Certification of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (5) |
(1) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 of our Amendment to Registration Statement on Form S-1, as filed on January 27, 1999 (File No. 333-61381) and Exhibit 3.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K as filed on December 21, 2007.
(2) Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of our Current Report on Form 8-K as filed on February 21, 2008.
(3) Incorporated by reference to an exhibit of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002, as filed on May 13, 2002.
(4) Filed herewith.
(5) These exhibits are submitted herewith as accompanying this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and shall not be deemed to be filed as part of such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
38