AutoWeb, Inc. - Annual Report: 2018 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
☒
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018
or
☐
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from
to
Commission File Number 1-34761
AutoWeb, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
|
|
33-0711569
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
18872 MacArthur Boulevard, Suite 200
Irvine, California 92612-1400
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number,
including area code (949) 225-4500
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share
|
|
The Nasdaq Capital Market
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a
well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the
Securities
Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not
required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or
Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant:
(1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has
submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (section 232.405
of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such
files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent
filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (section 229.405
of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. ☒
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller
reporting company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions
of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated
filer” and “smaller reporting company,” and
“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large accelerated filer ☐
|
Accelerated filer ☐
|
Non-accelerated filer ☐
|
Smaller reporting company ☒
|
|
|
|
Emerging growth company☐
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check
mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended
transition period for complying with any new or revised financial
accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a
shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
Based
on the closing sale price of $4.52 for our common stock on The
Nasdaq Capital Market on June 30, 2018, the aggregate market
value of outstanding shares of common stock held by non-affiliates
was approximately $44 million.
As
of March 5, 2019, 12,985,950, shares of our common stock were
outstanding.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of our Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2019 Annual
Meeting, expected to be filed within 120 days of our fiscal year
end, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
AutoWeb, Inc.
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018
|
|
|
Page
Number
|
Part I
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
||
|
10
|
||
|
20
|
||
|
20
|
||
|
20
|
||
|
20
|
||
|
|||
Part II
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
||
|
21
|
||
|
21
|
||
|
29
|
||
|
29
|
||
|
29
|
||
|
29
|
||
|
31
|
||
|
|||
Part III
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
||
|
31
|
||
|
31
|
||
|
31
|
||
|
31
|
||
|
|||
Part IV
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
||
|
39
|
||
|
|
40
|
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
The Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”) encourages companies to disclose
forward-looking information so that investors can better understand
a company’s future prospects and make informed investment
decisions. This Annual Report on Form 10-K and our proxy statement,
parts of which are incorporated herein by reference, contain such
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as
“anticipates,” “could,” “may,”
“estimates,” “expects,”
“projects,” “intends,”
“pending,” “plans,” “believes,”
“will” and words of similar substance, or the negative
of those words, used in connection with any discussion of future
operations or financial performance identify forward-looking
statements. In particular, statements regarding expectations and
opportunities, new product expectations and capabilities, and our
outlook regarding our performance and growth are forward-looking
statements. This Annual Report on Form 10-K also contains
statements regarding plans, goals and objectives. There is no
assurance that we will be able to carry out our plans or achieve
our goals and objectives or that we will be able to do so
successfully on a profitable basis. These forward-looking
statements are just predictions and involve risks and
uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, and actual
results may differ materially from these statements. Factors that
could cause actual results to differ materially from those
reflected in forward-looking statements include but are not limited
to, those discussed in “Item 1A. Risk Factors,”
and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Investors are
urged not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they
were made. Except as may be required by law, we do not undertake
any obligation, and expressly disclaim any obligation, to update or
alter any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise. All forward-looking
statements contained herein are qualified in their entirety by the
foregoing cautionary statements.
-ii-
PART I
Item 1.
Business
AutoWeb, Inc. was incorporated on May 17, 1996,
under the laws of the State of Delaware. Unless specified
otherwise, as used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the terms
“we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company” or “AutoWeb” refer to AutoWeb, Inc. and its
subsidiaries.
Available Information
Our corporate website is located at
www.autoweb.com.
Information on our website is not incorporated by reference in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K. At or through the Investor Relations
section of our website we make available our annual reports on Form
10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K
and other filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Overview
We are
a digital marketing company for the automotive industry that
assists automotive retail dealers (“Dealers”) and automotive
manufacturers (“Manufacturers”) market and sell
new and used vehicles to consumers through our programs for online
lead and traffic referrals, Dealer marketing products and services,
online advertising and mobile products.
Our
consumer-facing automotive websites (“Company Websites”) provide
consumers with information and tools to aid them with their
automotive purchase decisions and the ability to submit inquiries
requesting Dealers to contact the consumers regarding purchasing or
leasing vehicles (“Leads”). Leads are
internally-generated from our Company Websites (“Internally-Generated Leads”) or
acquired from third parties (“Non-Internally-Generated Leads”)
that generate Leads from their websites (“Non-Company Websites”). Our click
traffic referral program provides consumers who are shopping for
vehicles online with targeted offers based on make, model and
geographic location. As these consumers conduct online research on
our Company Websites or on the site of one of our network of
automotive publishers, they are presented with relevant offers on a
timely basis and, upon the consumer clicking on the displayed
advertisement, are sent to the appropriate website location of one
of our Dealer, Manufacturer or advertising customers.
Products and
Services
We sell Internally-Generated Leads and
Non-Internally-Generated Leads directly to Dealers and indirectly
to Dealers through a wholesale market consisting of Manufacturers
and other third parties in the automotive Lead distribution
industry. The click traffic program links consumers to
Dealers and Manufacturer websites when the consumers click on
advertisements on Company Websites as well as websites operated by
third parties that have contracted with the Company as publishers
under the click traffic program. In addition to our Leads and click
traffic programs, we also offer Dealers and Manufacturers other
products and services, including WebLeads+ and Payment
Pro®,
to assist them in capturing online, in-market customers and selling
more vehicles by improving conversion of Leads to sale
transactions.
Lead Programs
We
provide Dealers and Manufacturers with opportunities to market
their vehicles efficiently to potential vehicle
buyers. Dealers participate in our Lead programs, and
Manufacturers participate in our Lead programs, our display
advertising programs and our direct marketing programs, reaching
consumers who are in the market to acquire a
vehicle. For consumers, we provide, at no cost to the
consumer, an easy way to obtain valuable information to assist them
in their vehicle shopping process. Leads may be submitted by
consumers through our Company Websites or through Non-Company
Websites. For consumers using our Company Websites, we provide
research information, including vehicle specification data, safety
data, pricing data, photos, videos, regional rebate and incentive
data, and additional tools, such as the compare and configuration
tools, to assist them in this process. We also provide
additional content on our Company Websites, including our database
of articles, such as consumer and professional reviews, and other
analyses. Additional automotive information is also
available on our Company Websites to assist consumers with specific
vehicle research, such as the trade-in value of their current
vehicle.
New Vehicle Leads Program. Our Leads program for new vehicles allows
consumers to submit requests for pricing and availability of
specific makes and models. A new vehicle Lead provides a
Dealer with information regarding the make and model of a vehicle
in which the consumer is interested, and may also include
additional data regarding the consumer’s needs, including any
vehicle trade-in, whether the consumer wishes to lease or buy, and
other options that are important to the vehicle acquisition
decision. A Lead will usually also include the consumer’s
name, phone number and email address and may include a postal
address.
Dealers participating in our new vehicle Leads
program are provided with iControl by AutoWeb, our proprietary
technology that allows Dealers many options to filter and control
the volume and source of their Leads. iControl by AutoWeb can be controlled at the
dealership (or by a representative of AutoWeb on behalf of the
dealership), at the Dealer group level from a web-based,
easy-to-use console that makes it quick and simple for dealerships
to change their Lead acquisition strategy to adjust for inventory
conditions at their dealerships and broader industry patterns (such
as changes in gas prices or changes in consumer demand). From
the console, dealerships can easily contract or expand territories
and increase, restrict or block specific models and Lead web
sources, making it much easier to target inventory challenges and
focus marketing resources more efficiently.
Our
Leads are subject to quality verification that is designed to
maintain the high-quality of our Leads and increase the Lead buy
rates for our Lead customers. Quality verification includes the
validation of name, phone number, email address and postal address.
Our quality verification also involves proprietary systems as well
as arrangements with third-party vendors specializing in customer
validation. After a Lead has been subjected to quality
verification, if we have placement coverage for the Lead within our
own Dealer network, we send the Lead to Dealers that sell the type
of vehicle requested in the consumer’s geographic area. We
also send an email message to the consumer with the Dealer’s
name and phone number, and if the Dealer has a dedicated internet
manager, the name of that manager. Dealers contact the consumer
with a price quote and availability information for the requested
vehicle. In addition to sales of Leads directly to Dealers in our
network, we also sell Leads wholesale to Manufacturers for delivery
to their Dealers and to third parties that have placement coverage
for the Lead with their own customers.
Dealers
participate in our retail new vehicle Lead program by entering into
contracts directly with us or through major Dealer groups.
Generally, our Dealer contracts may be terminated by either party
on 30 days’ notice and are non-exclusive. The majority of our
retail new vehicle Lead revenues consists of either a monthly
subscription or a per-Lead fee paid by Dealers in our network. We
reserve the right to adjust our fees to Dealers upon 30 days’
prior notice at any time during the term of the contract.
Manufacturers (directly or through their marketing agencies) and
other third parties participate in our wholesale new vehicle Lead
programs generally by entering into agreements where either party
has the right to terminate upon prior notice, with the length of
time for the notice varying by contract. Revenues from retail new
vehicle Leads accounted for 18%, 19% and 22% of total revenues in
2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Revenues from wholesale Leads
accounted for 52%, 46% and 46% of total revenues in 2018, 2017 and
2016, respectively.
Used Vehicle Leads Program. Our used vehicle Lead program allows
consumers to search for used vehicles according to specific search
parameters, such as the price, make, model, mileage, year and
location of the vehicle. The consumer is able to locate and display
the description, price and, if available, digital images of
vehicles that satisfy the consumer’s search
parameters. The consumer can then submit a Lead for
additional information regarding a vehicle that we then deliver to
the Dealer offering the vehicle. In addition to sending Leads
directly to Dealers through our Lead delivery system, consumers may
choose to contact the Dealer using a toll free number posted next
to the vehicle search results. We charge each Dealer that
participates in the used Vehicle Leads program a monthly
subscription or per Lead fee. Revenues from used vehicle
Leads accounted for 7%, 9% and 10% of total revenues in 2018, 2017
and 2016, respectively.
Other Dealer Products and Services
In
addition to Leads and AutoWeb traffic programs, we also offer
products and services that assist Dealers in connecting with
in-market consumers and closing vehicle sales.
WebLeads+. Designed to work in connection with a
Dealer’s participation in our Lead programs, WebLeads+ is a
third-party product that offers a Dealer multiple coupon options
that display relevant marketing messages to consumers visiting the
Dealer’s website. When a Dealer uses
WebLeads+, consumers visiting the Dealer’s website are
encouraged to take action in two ways. First, while
interacting with the Dealer website, a consumer is presented with a
customized special offer formatted for easy Lead submission. If a
vehicle quote is requested, the Lead goes directly into the
dealership management tool so a salesperson can promptly address
the customer’s questions. Second, if the consumer
leaves the Dealer’s website but remains online, the
WebLeads+ product keeps the coupon active in a new browser,
providing the Dealer a repeat branding opportunity and giving the
consumer an easy way to re-engage with the Dealer’s website
through submission of a Lead. The additional Leads
generated by the coupons are seamlessly integrated into our
Extranet tool.
Payment
Pro®. Payment
Pro® is a Dealer website
conversion tool based on a third-party product that offers
consumers real-time online monthly payment information based on an
instant evaluation process. The payments are based on
the consumer’s credit, the actual vehicle being researched
and the Dealer finance rates without requiring the consumer to
provide personal information, such as date of birth or social
security number. The Lead goes directly into the Dealer’s
management tool so that a salesperson can promptly address the
consumer’s inquiry.
Advertising Programs
Our Company Websites attract an audience of
prospective automotive buyers that advertisers can target through
display advertising. A primary way advertisers use our Company
Websites to reach consumers is through vehicle content
targeting. This allows automotive marketers to reach
consumers while they are researching one of our automotive segments
such as mini-vans or SUVs and offer Manufacturers sponsorship
opportunities to assist in their efforts both in terms of customer
retention and conquest strategies. Our Company Websites also offer
Manufacturers the opportunity to feature their makes and models
within highly contextual content. Through their advertising
placements, Manufacturers can direct consumers to their respective
websites for further information. We believe this transfer
of focused, interested
consumers to Manufacturer sites is the most significant action
measured by Manufacturers in evaluating our performance and value
for the Manufacturer’s marketing programs. Through our
agreement with a third party, the third party sells our fixed
placement advertising across our Company Websites to automotive
advertisers. We also offer a direct marketing platform that enables
Manufacturers to selectively target in-market consumers during the
often-extended vehicle shopping process. Designed to keep a
specific automotive brand in consideration, our direct marketing
programs allow automotive marketers to deliver specific
communication through either email or direct mail formats to
in-market consumers during their purchase
cycle.
Our click traffic program is our
pay-per-click advertising program. The click traffic program
utilizes proprietary technology to offer consumers who are shopping
targeted offers based on make, model and geographic location. As
these consumers are conducting research on one of AutoWeb’s
consumer facing websites or on the site of one of our network of
automotive publishers, they are presented with relevant offers on a
timely basis and, upon the consumer clicking on the displayed
advertisement, are sent to the appropriate website location of one
of our Dealer, Manufacturer or advertising customers. The AutoWeb
network of publisher websites reaches and engages with millions of
potential car buyers each month, and we believe it provides
high-intent, high-quality traffic that Dealers and other customers
cannot typically reach through their own marketing
efforts. The click traffic program is flexible and in addition
to driving traffic to a vehicle detail page, it can also send
website traffic to new vehicle sales, service, used vehicles or to
any other department where a customer wants to engage with
in-market consumers. In addition, we believe that the click traffic
program can be used to conquest competitive shoppers who are
researching another brand more effectively than can typically be
done using other search engines. Advertisers only pay for the
clicks they receive, and are able to structure campaigns with
flexible budgets and no long-term commitments in order to manage
spend versus key performance indicators. Ongoing feedback from our
customers is that this traffic provides highly targeted marketing opportunities and is a
valuable tool to help Dealers sell more
vehicles.
Advertising
revenues, including direct marketing, accounted for 22%, 24% and
16% of total revenues in 2018, 2017 and 2016,
respectively.
Strategy
Our
goal is to garner a larger share of the billions of dollars spent
annually by Dealers and Manufacturers on automotive marketing
services. We plan to achieve this objective through the
following principal strategies:
Increasing The Supply of High-Quality Leads. High-quality Leads are those Leads that result
in high transaction (i.e., vehicle acquisition) closing rates for
our Dealer customers. Internally-Generated Leads are
generally higher quality than Non-Internally-Generated Leads and
increase the overall quality of our Lead portfolio.
Non-Internally-Generated Leads are of varying quality depending on
the source of these Leads. We plan to increase the supply of
high-quality Leads generated to sell to our customers primarily
by:
●
Increasing
traffic acquisition activities for our Company
Websites. Traffic to our Company Websites is monetized
primarily though the creation of Leads that are delivered to our
Dealer or Manufacturer customers to help them market and sell new
and used vehicles, and through the sale of advertising space on our
Company Websites. We plan to increase the traffic to our Company
Websites through effective search engine optimization
(“SEO”) and search engine marketing
(“SEM”) traffic acquisition activities and
enhancements to our Company Websites. SEO is the practice of
optimizing keywords in website content to drive traffic to a
website through natural search, and SEM is the practice of bidding
on keywords on search engines to drive traffic to a
website
o SEO
and SEM traffic acquisition activities. Traffic to our Company Websites is obtained
through a variety of sources and methods, including direct
navigation to our Company Websites, SEO, SEM, direct marketing and
partnering with other website publishers that provide links to our
websites. Our goal is that over time, paid traffic such
as SEM will be balanced by greater visitation from direct
navigation and SEO, which we expect to result in increased Lead
volumes and gross profit margins.
o Continuing
to enhance the quality and user experience of our Company
Websites. We continuously make enhancements to
our Company Websites, including enhancements of the design and
functionality of our Company Websites. These
enhancements are intended to position our Company Websites as
comprehensive best in class destinations for automotive purchase
research by consumers. By doing so, we believe we will increase the
volume of our Internally-Generated Leads.
●
Increasing
the conversion rate of visitors to Leads on our Company
Websites. Through
increased SEO and SEM activities and significant content, tools and
user interface enhancements to our websites, we believe we will be
able to increase the number of website visits and improve website
“engagement,” and thereby increase the conversion of
page views into Leads. We believe that an increased
conversion rate of page views into Leads could result in higher
revenue per visitor.
●
Relationships
with Suppliers of High-Quality, Non-Internally-Generated
Leads. We plan
to continue to develop and maintain strong relationships with
suppliers of Non-Internally-Generated Leads that consistently
provide high-quality Leads.
Increasing Leads Sales to our Customers. Our principal source of revenue comes from sales
of Leads to our retail and wholesale Lead customers. Our goal is to
increase sales of Leads to our customers primarily
by:
●
Increasing
Lead Sales to Dealers. Sales of Leads to our Dealer network
constitute a significant source of our revenues. During
2018, we continued to focus our Dealer acquisition and retention
strategies on dealerships to which we could deliver a higher
percentage of our Internally-Generated Leads. We believe
this will result in increased vehicle sales for our Dealers and
ultimately stronger relationships with us because, based on our
evaluation of the performance data and information discussed above,
we believe our Internally-Generated Leads are of high-quality. Our
goal is to increase the number of Leads sold to our retail Dealer
customers by:
o
increasing
the quality of the Leads sold to our Dealers,
o
increasing
the number of Dealers in our Dealer network,
o
reducing
Dealer churn in our Dealer network,
o
providing
customizable Lead programs to meet our Dealers’ unique
marketing requirements,
o
providing
additional value added marketing services that help Dealers more
effectively utilize the internet to market and sell new and used
vehicles,
o
increasing
overall Dealer satisfaction by improving all aspects of our
services,
o
increasing
the size of our retail Dealer footprint,
o
focusing
on higher revenue Dealers that are more cost-effective to support,
and
o
enhancing
our internal Lead generation activities by leveraging our expanded
retail lead coverage.
●
Increasing
Lead Sales to Wholesale Customers. We currently have agreements to sell
Leads to most Manufacturer Lead programs. We intend to
continue to demonstrate the value of third-party leads to
Manufacturers by utilizing close rate and cross sell data that
demonstrates that third party leads result in incremental sales for
the Manufacturers. Our intention is to increase revenue by
having Manufacturers enhance business rules, program capacity,
pricing and coverage so that each Manufacturer can purchase more of
our Internally-Generated Leads.
Continuing to develop the click traffic program for online
automotive advertisers and publishers. Our
click traffic program uses proprietary technology and a
pay-per-click business model to analyze web traffic and adjust
advertiser costs accordingly based on traffic
quality. This traffic network is targeted to attract
high-intent, high-volume publishers and is intended to allow them
to monetize traffic that has previously been
under-monetized. In-market car shoppers are presented
with highly relevant display advertisements and benefit from an
online experience that delivers information that consumers use in
making their car buying decisions. Manufacturers benefit
from this high-quality traffic from serious in-market car
buyers. Our click traffic program enables Manufacturers
and Dealers to optimize their advertising by driving traffic to
appropriate areas of their Tier 1 (Manufacturer national
advertising), Tier 2 (Manufacturer and advertising associations
regional advertising) and Tier 3 (Dealer)
websites.
We believe that Manufacturers and Dealers will see
the measurable attribution from this click traffic and will
reallocate marketing spend from traditional channels into this
emerging medium. We also plan to grow the size of this addressable
marketplace by adding high-quality and high-volume automotive
publishers to our network, by targeting in-market consumers on a
variety of social media platforms and by continuing to optimize
this advertising platform on our consumer facing websites. In
addition, we believe that the flexibility of our solution combined
with high-quality traffic with automotive purchase intent may allow
us to grow our click advertiser
base as the level of attribution from this product is understood by
advertising partners.
Increasing Display Advertising Revenues.
As traffic to, and time spent on, our
Company Websites by consumers increases, we will seek to increase
our advertising revenues. Through our agreement with a
third party, we benefit from the third party’s
relationships with major automotive Manufacturers and/or the
third party’s advertising agencies by increasing revenue for
our traditional display advertising. It is our belief that if
the volume of our traffic increases, advertisers will recognize
this increased value by agreeing to purchase additional advertising
space available on our Company Websites. Additionally,
we believe that our AutoWeb Traffic Product provides an
opportunity to increase AutoWeb advertising revenue through
additional monetization opportunities for our existing and growing
traffic.
Focus on Mobile Technologies. As
consumers increasingly engage with internet content using mobile
devices, AutoWeb will continue to focus on mobile technologies that
facilitate communication between Dealers and consumers on smart
phones and tablets at the time, place, and in a manner preferred by
many consumers. This focus on the mobile platform
is a core part of our strategy moving forward regarding lead
generation, automotive research, website advertising and traffic
generation.
Continuing to Expand our Products and Services. We
gather significant amounts of data on consumer intent as it relates
to purchasing vehicles. We intend to use this data to
create products and services, including direct business database
offerings, that we believe will ultimately help Manufacturers and
Dealers market and sell more new and used vehicles. Our
objective is to generate revenues from this asset in the most
effective and efficient ways possible.
Strategic Acquisitions,
Investments and Alliances. Our
goal is to grow and enhance our business. We may do so, in part,
through strategic acquisitions, investments and alliances. We
continue to review strategic opportunities that may provide
opportunities for growth. We believe that strategic acquisitions,
investments and alliances may allow us to increase market share,
benefit from advancements in technology and strengthen our business
operations by enhancing our product and service
offerings.
Our
ability to implement the foregoing strategies and plans is subject
to risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our
control. Accordingly, there is no assurance that we will
successfully implement our strategies and plans. See
“Item 1A. Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
Seasonality
Our
quarterly revenues and operating results have fluctuated in the
past and may fluctuate in the future due to various factors,
including consumer buying trends, changing economic conditions,
Manufacturer incentive programs and actual or threatened severe
weather events. Lead volume is typically highest in
summer (third quarter) and winter (first quarter) months, followed
by spring (second quarter) and fall (fourth quarter)
months.
Intellectual Property
Our intellectual property includes patents related
to our innovations, products and services; trademarks related to
our brands, products and services; copyrights in software and
creative content; trade secrets; and other intellectual property
rights and licenses of various kinds. We seek to protect our
intellectual property assets through patent, copyright, trade
secret, trademark and other laws and through contractual
provisions. We enter into confidentiality and invention assignment
agreements with our employees and contractors, and non-disclosure
agreements with third parties with whom we conduct business in
order to secure our proprietary rights and additionally limit
access to, and disclosure of, our proprietary
information. We have registered trademarks with the
United States Patent and Trademark Office, including
AutoWeb®,
AutoWeb.com®,
the global highway logo, Autobytel, Autobytel.com, MyGarage,
iControl by Autobytel®,
TextShield®,
and Payment Pro®.
We cannot provide any assurances that any of our intellectual
property rights will be enforceable by us in
litigation.
Additional
information regarding certain risks related to our intellectual
property is included in Part I, Item 1A “Risk
Factors” of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Competition
In
the automotive-related digital marketing services marketplace we
compete for Dealer and Manufacturer
customers. Competition with respect to our core Lead
referral programs continued to be impacted by changing industry
conditions in 2018. We continue to compete with several companies
that maintain business models similar to ours, some with greater
resources. In addition, competition has increased from larger
competitors that traditionally have competed only in the used
vehicle market. Dealers continue to invest in their
proprietary websites and traffic acquisition activities, and we
expect this trend to continue as Dealers strive to own and control
more Lead generating assets under their captive
brands. Additionally, all major Manufacturers that
market their vehicles in the U.S. have their own websites that
market their vehicles direct to consumers and generate Leads for
delivery direct to the Manufacturers’ Dealers. We compete
based on quality of our Leads and pricing.
We
believe that third-party Leads have been the standard in our
industry for many years. However, we continue to observe new
and emerging business models, including pay-per-sale and consumer
pay models, relating to the generation and delivery of
Leads. From time to time, new products and services are
introduced that take the focus away from third-party Lead
generation, which we believe is a profitable way to sell
vehicles to in-market buyers. Dealers and Manufacturers
may decide to pull back on their third-party
Lead programs to test these new approaches.
In
the display advertising marketplace, we compete with major internet
portals, transaction-based websites, automotive related companies,
numerous lifestyle websites and emerging entrants in the relatively
new automotive click revenue medium. According to Emarketer
forecasts, the top two digital advertising platforms in the U.S.
are Google and Facebook, which Emarketer expects to maintain their
dominant hold on digital advertising dollars. We also compete with
traditional marketing channels such as print, radio and
television.
In
pay-per-click advertising, we compete with established search
engine providers as well as with a growing number of digital
marketing platforms focused on generating dealership website
traffic from inventory listings and social media campaigns. In
addition, some industry providers who have historically specialized
in inventory aggregation or on providing SEM agency services to
Dealers are now expanding into the area of website traffic
generation. Also, many dealership website providers are now
offering traffic solutions as part of their bundle of
services.
In
addition, some traditional data providers are moving to deliver
personalized digital marketing services at scale. These digital
marketing hubs and data management platforms provide marketers with
standardized access to audience data, content, workflow triggers
and operational analytics to automate execution and optimization of
multichannel campaigns. These services could be used as a source of
lead generation and website traffic by Dealers and Manufacturers
and could replace our existing product offerings.
Customers
We
have a concentration of credit risk with our automotive industry
related accounts receivable balances, particularly with Urban
Science Applications (which represents several Manufacturer
programs), Media.net Advertising, and General Motors. During 2018,
approximately 37% of our total revenues were derived from these
three customers, and approximately 41% or $11.2 million of gross
accounts receivable related to these three customers at December
31, 2018. Urban Science Applications accounted for 18%
and 21% of total revenues and accounts receivable, respectively, as
of December 31, 2018. Media.net Advertising accounted for 10% and
6% of total revenues and accounts receivable, respectively, as of
December 31, 2018. General Motors accounted for 9% and 13% of total
revenues and accounts receivable, respectively, as of December 31,
2018.
Operations and Technology
We
believe that our future success is significantly dependent upon our
ability to provide high-performance, reliable and comprehensive
websites, advertising systems; enhance consumer and Dealer product
and service offerings; maintain the highest levels of information
privacy; and ensure transactional security. Our Company Websites
and advertising systems are hosted at secure third-party data
center facilities and public cloud providers. These data centers
and public cloud systems utilize redundant power infrastructure,
redundant network connectivity, multiple locations, distributed
services, fire detection and suppression systems and security
systems to prevent unauthorized access and to provide high
availability of their services, upon which our technology is built,
deployed and operated. Our network and computer systems are built
on industry standard technology.
System
enhancements are primarily intended to accommodate increased
traffic across our Company Websites, improve the speed in which
Leads and advertisements are processed and introduce new and
enhanced products and services. System enhancements entail the
implementation of sophisticated new technology and system
processes. We implement industry standard automation and delivery
processes and employ centralized quality assurance to improve the
quality, scalability, security, and availability of our products.
We plan to continue to make investments in technology as we believe
appropriate.
Government Regulation
We
are subject to laws and regulations generally applicable to
providers of digital marketing services, including federal and
state laws and regulations governing data security and privacy;
voice, email and text messaging communications with consumers;
unfair and deceptive acts and practices; advertising; contests,
sweepstakes and promotions; and content regulation. For additional
important information related to government regulation of our
business, including governmental regulations relating to the
marketing and sale of automobiles, see the information set forth in
Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
Employees
As
of March 5, 2019, we had 199 employees.
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
The risks described below are not the only risks
that we face. The following risks as well as risks and
uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem
to be immaterial may materially and adversely affect our business,
results of operations, financial condition, earnings per share,
cash flow or the trading price of our stock, individually and
collectively referred to in these Risk Factors as our
“financial
performance.” See also the discussion
of “Forward-Looking Statements” immediately preceding
Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
We may be unable to increase Lead revenues and could suffer a
decline in revenues due to dealer attrition.
We
derive more than 98% of our Lead revenues from Lead fees paid by
Dealers and Manufacturers participating in our Lead programs. Our
Lead fees decreased $10.1 million, or 9%, in 2018 compared to 2017.
Our ability to increase revenues from sales of Leads is dependent
on a mix of interrelated factors that include increasing Lead
revenues by attracting and retaining Dealers and Manufacturers and
increasing the number of high-quality Leads we sell to Dealers and
Manufacturers. We are also focused on higher revenue Dealers that
are more cost-effective to support. Our sales strategy is intended
to result in more profitable relationships with our Dealers both in
terms of cost to supply Leads and to support the
Dealers. Dealer churn impacts our revenues, and if our sales
strategy does not mitigate the loss in revenues by maintaining the
overall number of Leads sold by increasing sales to other Dealers
or Manufacturers while maintaining the overall margins we receive
from the Leads sold, our revenues would decrease. We cannot provide
any assurances that we will be able to increase Lead fee revenues,
prevent Dealer attrition or offset the revenues lost due to Dealer
attrition by other means, and our failure to do so could materially
and adversely affect our financial performance.
We may lose customers or quality Lead supplies to our
competitors.
Our
ability to provide increased numbers of high-quality Leads to our
customers is dependent on increasing the number of
Internally-Generated Leads and acquiring high-quality
Non-Internally-Generated Leads from third parties. Originating
Internally-Generated Leads is dependent on our ability to increase
consumer traffic to our Company Websites by providing secure and
easy to use websites with relevant and quality content for
consumers and increasing visibility of our brands to consumers and
by our SEM activities. We compete for Dealer and Manufacturer
customers and for acquisition of Non-Internally-Generated Leads
with companies that maintain automotive Lead referral businesses
that are very similar to ours. Many of these competitors are larger
than us and have greater financial resources than we have. If we
lose customers or quality Lead supply volume to our competitors, or
if our pricing or cost to acquire Leads is impacted, our financial
performance will be materially and adversely impacted.
Our financial performance could be materially and adversely
affected by changes in internet search engine algorithms and
dynamics.
We
use Google to generate a significant portion of the traffic to our
websites, and, to a lesser extent, we use other search engines and
meta-search websites to generate traffic to our websites,
principally through pay-per-click advertising campaigns. The
pricing and operating dynamics on these search engines can
experience rapid change commercially, technically and
competitively. For example, Google frequently updates and changes
the logic that determines the placement and display of results of a
consumer's search, such that the placement of links to our websites
can be negatively affected and our costs to improve or maintain our
placement in search results can increase.
We are affected by general economic and market conditions, and, in
particular, conditions in the automotive industry.
Our
financial performance is affected by general economic and market
factors, conditions in the automotive industry, and the market for
automotive marketing services, including, but not limited to, the
following:
●
Pricing
and purchase incentives for vehicles;
●
The
expectation that consumers will be purchasing fewer vehicles
overall during their lifetime as a result of better quality
vehicles and longer warranties;
●
The
impact of fuel prices on demand for the number and types of
vehicles;
●
Increases
or decreases in the number of retail Dealers or in the number of
Manufacturers and other wholesale customers in our customer
base;
●
Volatility
in spending by Manufacturers and others in their marketing budgets
and allocations;
●
The
competitive impact of consolidation in the online automotive
consumer referral industry;
●
The
effect of changes in transportation policy, including the potential
increase of public transportation options; and
●
The
effect of fewer vehicles being purchased as a result of new
business models and changes in consumer attitudes regarding the
need for vehicle ownership.
Concentration of
credit risk and risks due to significant customers could materially
and adversely affect our financial performance.
Financial
instruments that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit
risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, investments
and accounts receivable. Cash and cash equivalents are primarily
maintained with three financial institutions in the United States.
Deposits held by banks exceed the amount of insurance provided for
such deposits. Generally, these deposits may be redeemed upon
demand. Accounts receivable are primarily derived from fees billed
to Dealers and Manufacturers. We have a concentration of credit
risk with our automotive industry related accounts receivable
balances, particularly with Urban Science Applications (which
represents several Manufacturer programs), General Motors and
Media.net Advertising. During 2018 approximately 37% of the
Company’s total revenues were derived from these customers,
and they accounted for approximately 41% or $11.2 million of gross
accounts receivable at December 31, 2018. No collateral is
required to support our accounts receivables, and we maintain an
allowance for bad debts for potential credit losses. If
there is a decline in the general economic environment that
negatively affects the financial condition of our customers or an
increase in the number of customers that are dissatisfied with
their services, additional estimated allowances for bad debts and
customer credits may be required, and the adverse impact on our
financial performance could be material.
We depend on Manufacturers through our third party sales channel
for a significant amount of our advertising revenues, and we may
not be able to maintain or grow these relationships.
We
depend on Manufacturers through our third party sales channel for a
significant amount of our advertising revenues. A decline in the
level of advertising on our websites, reductions in advertising
rates or any significant failure to develop additional sources of
advertising would cause our advertising revenues to decline, which
could have a material adverse effect on our financial performance.
We periodically negotiate revisions to existing agreements and
these revisions could decrease our advertising revenues in future
periods and a number of our advertising agreements with
Manufacturers may be terminated at any time without cause. We may
not be able to maintain our relationship with Manufacturers on
favorable terms or find alternative comparable relationships
capable of replacing advertising revenues on terms satisfactory to
us. If we cannot do so, our advertising revenues would decline,
which could have a material adverse effect on our financial
performance.
Our
ability to maintain and add to our relationships with advertisers
and thereby increase advertising revenues is dependent on our
ability to attract consumers and acquire traffic to our Company
Websites and monetize that traffic at profitable margins with
advertisers. Our consumer facing websites compete with offerings
from the major internet portals, transaction based sites,
automotive-related verticals (websites with content that is
primarily automotive in nature) and numerous lifestyle websites.
Our advertising business is characterized by minimal barriers to
entry, and new competitors may be able to launch competitive
services at relatively low costs. If our Company Websites do not
provide a compelling, differentiated user experience, we may lose
visitors to competing sites, and if our website traffic declines,
we may lose relevance to our major advertisers who may reduce or
eliminate their advertising buys from us, which could have a
material and adverse effect on our financial
performance.
Uncertainty exists in the application of various laws and
regulations to our business. New laws or regulations applicable to
our business, or expansion or interpretation of existing laws and
regulations to apply to our business, could subject us to
licensing, claims, judgments and remedies, including monetary
liabilities and limitations on our business practices, and could
increase administrative costs or materially and adversely affect
our financial performance.
We
operate in a regulatory climate in which there is uncertainty as to
the application of various laws and regulations to our
business. Our business could be significantly affected
by different interpretations or applications of existing laws or
regulations, future laws or regulations, or actions or rulings by
judicial or regulatory authorities. Our operations may
be subjected to adoption, expansion or interpretation of various
laws and regulations, and compliance with these laws and
regulations may require us to obtain licenses at an undeterminable
and possibly significant initial and annual expense. These
additional expenditures may increase future overhead, thereby
potentially reducing our future results of operations. There can be
no assurances that future laws or regulations or interpretations or
expansions of existing laws or regulations will not impose
requirements on internet commerce that could substantially impair
the growth of e-commerce and adversely affect our financial
performance. The adoption of additional laws or regulations may
decrease the popularity or impede the expansion of e-commerce and
internet marketing, restrict our present business practices,
require us to implement costly compliance procedures or expose us
and/or our customers to potential liability.
We
may be deemed to “operate” or “do business”
in states where our customers conduct their business, resulting in
regulatory action. If any state licensing laws were determined to
be applicable to us, and if we are required to be licensed and we
are unable to do so, or we are otherwise unable to comply with laws
or regulations, we could be subject to fines or other penalties or
be compelled to discontinue operations in those
states. In the event any state’s regulatory
requirements impose state specific requirements on us or include us
within an industry-specific regulatory scheme, we may be required
to modify our marketing programs in that state in a manner that may
undermine the program’s attractiveness to consumers or
Dealers. In the alternative, if we determine that the licensing and
related requirements are overly burdensome, we may elect to
terminate operations in that state. In each case, our financial
performance could be materially and adversely
affected. We have identified below areas of government
regulation, which if changed or interpreted to apply to our
business, we believe could be costly for us and could materially
and adversely affect our financial performance.
Automotive
Dealer/ Broker and Vehicle Advertising Laws. All states comprehensively regulate vehicle sales
and lease transactions, including strict licensure requirements for
Dealers (and, in some states, brokers) and vehicle advertising.
Most of these laws and regulations, we believe, specifically
address only traditional vehicle purchase and lease transactions,
not internet-based Lead referral programs such as our programs. If
we determine that the licensing or other regulatory requirements in
a given state are applicable to us or to a particular marketing
services program, we may elect to obtain required licenses and
comply with applicable regulatory requirements. However,
if licensing or other regulatory requirements are overly
burdensome, we may elect to terminate operations or particular
marketing services programs in that state or elect to not operate
or introduce particular marketing services programs in that state.
In some states we have modified our marketing programs or pricing
models to reduce uncertainty regarding our compliance with local
laws. As we introduce new services, we may need to incur additional
costs associated with additional licensing regulations and
regulatory requirements.
Financial
Broker and Consumer Credit Laws. Through
our websites consumers can click through to Dealer, Manufacturer
and potential lender websites to obtain information regarding
automotive financing. All online applications for
financing quotes are completed on the
respective third party’s websites. We receive marketing fees
from financial institutions and Dealers in connection with this
marketing activity. We do not demand, nor do we receive any fees
from consumers for these services. In the event states require us
to be licensed as a financial broker or finder, we may be unable to
comply with a state’s laws or regulations, or we could be
required to incur significant fees and expenses to obtain any
financial broker required license and comply with regulatory
requirements. In addition, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act established a new consumer
financial protection bureau with broad regulatory powers, which
could lead to regulation of our advertising business directly or
indirectly through regulation of automotive finance companies and
other financial institutions.
Insurance
Broker Laws. We provide links
on our websites and referrals from call centers enabling consumers
to be referred to third parties to receive quotes for insurance
from such third parties. All online applications for quotes are
completed on the respective insurance carriers’ or other
third party websites, and all applications for quotes obtained
through call center referrals are conducted by the insurance
carrier or other third party. We receive marketing fees from
participants in connection with this marketing activity. We do not
receive any premiums from consumers nor do we charge consumers fees
for our services.
Changes in the taxation of internet commerce may result in
increased costs.
Because
our business is dependent on the internet, the adoption of new
local, state or federal tax laws or regulations or new
interpretations of existing laws or regulations by governmental
authorities may subject us to additional local, state or federal
sales, use or income taxes and could decrease the growth of
internet usage or marketing or the acceptance of internet commerce
which could, in turn, decrease the demand for our services and
increase our costs. As a result, our financial
performance could be materially and adversely affected. State
taxing authorities are reviewing and re-evaluating the tax
treatment of companies engaged in internet commerce, including the
application of sales taxes to internet marketing businesses similar
to ours, as a source of tax revenues. We accrue for tax
contingencies based upon our estimate of the taxes ultimately
expected to be paid, which we update over time as more information
becomes available, new legislation or rules are adopted or taxing
authorities interpret their existing statutes and rules to apply to
internet commerce, including internet marketing businesses similar
to ours. The amounts ultimately paid in resolution of reviews
or audits by taxing authorities could differ materially from the
amounts we have accrued and result in additional tax expense, and
our financial performance could be materially and adversely
affected.
Changes in applicable tax regulations and resolutions of tax
disputes could negatively affect our financial
results.
The
Company is subject to taxation in the United States. On December
22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation
commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
(“TCJA”). The
legislation implements many new U.S. domestic and international tax
provisions. Many aspects of the TCJA remain unclear, and although
additional clarifying guidance is expected to be issued (by the
Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), the U.S. Treasury
Department or via a technical correction law change), it may not be
clarified for some time. In addition, a number of U.S. states
have not yet updated their laws to take into account the new
federal legislation. As a result, there may be further impacts of
the new law on our financial performance. It is possible that
the TCJA, or interpretations under it, could change and could have
an adverse effect on us, and such effect could be
material.
We may require additional capital to implement new strategic plans,
modernize and upgrade our technology and systems, pursue business
objectives and respond to business opportunities, challenges or
unforeseen circumstances. If capital is not available to us, or is
not available on favorable terms, our financial performance could
be materially and adversely affected.
We
may require additional capital to implement new strategic plans,
modernize and upgrade our technology and systems, pursue business
objectives and respond to business opportunities, challenges or
unforeseen circumstances, including to develop new products or
services, improve existing products and services, enhance our
operating infrastructure and acquire complementary businesses and
technologies. As a result, we may need to engage in equity or debt
financings to secure additional funds. However, additional funds
may not be available when we need them, on terms that are
acceptable to us, or at all.
Any
debt financing that we may secure in the future could involve
restrictive covenants that may make it more difficult for us to
obtain additional capital. Volatility in the credit markets may
also have an adverse effect on our ability to obtain debt
financing. If we raise additional funds through further issuances
of equity or convertible debt securities, our existing stockholders
could suffer significant dilution, and any new equity securities we
issue could have rights, preferences and privileges superior to
those of holders of our common stock. If we are unable to obtain
adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to us, when
we require it, our ability to continue to implement new strategic
plans, modernize and upgrade our technology and systems, pursue
business objectives and respond to business opportunities,
challenges or unforeseen circumstances could be significantly
limited, and our financial performance could be materially and
adversely affected.
Data Security and Privacy Risks
Our
business is subject to various laws, rules and regulations relating
to data security and privacy. New data security and privacy laws,
rules and regulations may be adopted regarding the internet or
other online services that could limit our business flexibility or
cause us to incur higher compliance costs. In each case,
our financial performance could be materially and adversely
affected. We have identified below some of these risks
that we believe could materially and adversely affect our financial
performance.
Anti-spam
laws, rules and regulations. Various state and federal laws, rules and
regulations regulate email communications and internet advertising
and restrict or prohibit unsolicited email (commonly known as
“spam”). These laws, rules or regulations may adversely
affect our ability to market our services to consumers in a
cost-effective manner. The federal Controlling the Assault of
Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003
(“CAN-SPAM”) imposes complex and often burdensome
requirements in connection with sending commercial emails. In
addition, state laws regulating the sending of commercial emails,
including California’s law regulating the sending of
commercial emails, to the extent found to not be preempted by
CAN-SPAM, may impose requirements or conditions more restrictive
than CAN-SPAM. Violation of these laws, rules or regulations may
result in monetary fines or penalties or damage to our
reputation.
Data
privacy laws, rules and regulations. Various laws, rules and regulations govern the
collection, use, retention, sharing and security of data that we
receive from our users, advertisers and affiliates. In addition, we
have and post on our website our own privacy policies and practices
concerning the collection, use and disclosure of user data and
personal information. Any failure, or perceived failure, by us to
comply with our posted privacy policies, Federal Trade Commission
requirements or orders or other federal or state privacy or
consumer protection-related laws, regulations or industry
self-regulatory principles could result in proceedings or actions
against us by governmental entities or others. Further, failure or
perceived failure by us to comply with our policies, applicable
requirements or industry self-regulatory principles related to the
collection, use, sharing or security of personal information or
other privacy-related matters could result in a loss of user
confidence in us, damage to our brands, and ultimately in a loss of
users, advertisers or Lead referral and advertising affiliates. We
cannot predict whether new legislation or regulations concerning
data privacy and retention issues related to our business will be
adopted, or if adopted, whether they could impose requirements that
may result in a decrease in our user registrations and materially
and adversely affect our financial
performance. Proposals that have or are currently being
considered include restrictions relating to the collection and use
of data and information obtained through the tracking of internet
use, including the possible implementation of a “Do Not
Track” list, that would allow internet users to opt-out of
such tracking. Other proposals include enhanced rights for
consumers to obtain information regarding the sharing or sale of
their personal information and rights to opt-out or prevent the
sharing or sale of their personal information to third parties,
similar to the European Union’s General Data Protection
Regulation. The State of California has already enacted AB 375, the
California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, which includes significant
new personal data privacy rights for consumers. The law becomes
effective on January 1, 2020, but may be amended before it becomes
effective. Depending on the provisions of the law that become
effective, compliance with this law could have a material and
adverse effect on our financial performance
Security
risks associated with online Leads collection and referral,
advertising and e-commerce risks associated with other online fraud
and scams. A
significant issue for online businesses like ours is the secure
transmission of confidential and personal information over public
networks. Concerns over the security of transactions conducted on
the internet, consumer identity theft and user privacy issues have
been significant barriers to growth in consumer use of the
internet, online advertising and e-commerce. Despite our
implementation of security measures, our computer systems or those
of our vendors may be susceptible to electronic or physical
computer break-ins, viruses and other disruptive harms and security
breaches. In addition, consumers may experience losses of
personally identifiable information as a result of corporate
identity theft. Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries
in the field of cryptography or other developments may specifically
compromise our security measures. Because the techniques used to
obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage
systems change frequently and often are not recognized until
launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these
techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures on a
timely basis. Any perceived or actual unauthorized disclosure of
personally identifiable information that we collect or store,
whether through breach of our network by an unauthorized party,
employee theft or misuse, or otherwise, could harm our reputation
and brands, substantially impair our ability to attract and retain
our audiences, or subject us to claims or litigation arising from
damages suffered by consumers or Lead or traffic suppliers. If
consumers experience identity theft related to personally
identifiable information we collect or store, we may be exposed to
liability, adverse publicity and damage to our reputation. To the
extent that identity theft gives rise to reluctance to use our
websites or to supply us leads or traffic, or a decline in consumer
confidence in financial transactions over the internet, our
business could be adversely affected. Alleged or actual breaches of
the network of one of our business partners or competitors whom
consumers associate with us could also harm our reputation and
brands. In addition, we could incur significant costs in complying
with the multitude of state, federal and foreign laws regarding the
unauthorized disclosure of personal information. For example,
California law requires companies to inform individuals of any
security breaches that result in their personal information being
stolen. Because our success depends on the acceptance of online
services and e-commerce, we may incur significant costs to protect
against the threat of security breaches or to alleviate problems
caused by those breaches. Internet fraud has been increasing over
the past few years, and the Company has experienced fraudulent use
of our name and trademarks on websites in connection with the
purported sale of vehicles offered on third party websites, with
payments to be handled through an online escrow service purported
to be owned and operated by the Company. These
fraudulent online transactions and scams, should they continue to
increase in prevalence, could affect our reputation with consumers
and give rise to claims by consumers for funds transferred to the
fraudulent accounts, which could materially and adversely affect
our financial performance.
We
are insured for some, but not all, of the foregoing
risks. Even for those risks for which we are insured and
have coverage under the terms and conditions of the applicable
policies, there are no assurances given that the coverage limits
would be sufficient to cover all costs, liabilities or losses we
might incur or experience.
Telemarketing
Risks. We are
subject to various federal and state laws, rules, regulations and
orders regarding telemarketing and privacy, including restrictions
on the use of unsolicited emails and restrictions on marketing
activities conducted through the use of telephonic communications
(including text messaging to mobile telephones). Our financial
performance could be adversely affected by newly-adopted or amended
laws, rules, regulations and orders relating to telemarketing and
increased enforcement of such laws, rules, regulations or orders by
governmental agencies or by private litigants. One example of
regulatory changes that may affect our financial performance are
the regulations under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
(“TCPA”). Regulations adopted by the Federal
Communications Commission under the TCPA require the prior express
written consent of the called party before a caller can initiate
telemarketing calls (i) to wireless numbers (including text
messaging) using an automatic telephone dialing system or an
artificial or prerecorded voice; or (ii) to residential lines using
an artificial or prerecorded voice. Failure to comply with the TCPA
can result in significant penalties, including statutory damages.
We may become subject to lawsuits (including class-action lawsuits)
alleging that our business violated the TCPA. Under the TCPA,
plaintiffs may seek actual monetary loss or statutory damages of
$500 per violation, whichever is greater, and courts may treble the
damage award for willful or knowing violations. Such litigation,
even if not meritorious, could result in substantial costs and
diversion of management attention and an adverse outcome could
materially and adversely affect our financial
performance. Our efforts to comply with these
regulations may negatively affect conversion rates of leads, and
thus, our revenue or profitability.
Technology Risks
Our
business is dependent on keeping pace with advances in technology.
If we are unable to keep pace with advances in technology,
consumers may stop using our services and our revenues will
decrease. Our financial performance may be materially and adversely
impacted by material investments in
technology. The
internet and electronic commerce markets are characterized by rapid
technological change, changes in user and customer requirements,
frequent new service and product introductions embodying new
technologies, including mobile internet applications, and the
emergence of new industry standards and practices that could render
our existing websites and technology obsolete. These market
characteristics are intensified by the evolving nature of the
market and the fact that many companies are expected to introduce
new internet products and services in the near future. If we are
unable to adapt to changing technologies, our financial performance
could be materially and adversely affected. Our performance will
depend, in part, on our ability to continue to enhance our existing
services, develop new technology that addresses the increasingly
sophisticated and varied needs of our prospective customers,
license leading technologies and respond to technological advances
and emerging industry standards and practices on a timely and
cost-effective basis. The development of our websites, mobile
applications and other proprietary technology entails significant
technical and business risks. We may not be successful in using new
technologies effectively or adapting our websites or other
proprietary technology to customer requirements or to emerging
industry standards. In addition, our financial performance could be
materially and adversely affected by material investments in
technology in order to keep pace with technological
advances.
Interruptions
or failures in our information technology platforms, communication
systems or security systems could materially and adversely affect
our financial performance. Our information technology and communications
systems are susceptible to outages and interruptions due to fire,
flood, earthquake, power loss, telecommunications failures, cyber
attacks, terrorist attacks, technology operations and development
failures, failure of redundant systems and disaster recovery plans
and similar events. Such outages and interruptions could damage our
reputation and harm our operating results. Despite our
network security measures, our information technology platforms are
vulnerable to computer viruses, worms, physical and electronic
break-ins, sabotage and similar disruptions from unauthorized
tampering, as well as coordinated denial-of-service attacks. We do
not have multiple site capacity for all of our services. In the
event of delays or disruptions to services we rely on third party
providers to perform disaster recovery planning and services on our
behalf. We are vulnerable to extended failures to the extent that
planning and services are not adequate to meet our continued
technology platform, communication or security systems’
needs. We rely on third party providers for our primary
and secondary internet connections. Our co-location service and
public cloud services that provide infrastructure and platform
services, environmental and power support for our technology
platforms, communication systems and security systems are received
from third party providers. We have little or no control over these
third party providers. Any disruption of the services they provide
us or any failure of these third party providers to effectively
design and implement sufficient security systems or plan for
increases in capacity could, in turn, cause delays or disruptions
in our services. We are insured for some, but not all, of these
events. Even for those events for which we are insured
and have coverage under the terms and conditions of the applicable
policies, there are no assurances given that the coverage limits
would be sufficient to cover all losses we might incur or
experience. We have recently conducted evaluations of our
technology and business systems, and based on these evaluations, we
believe that our technology infrastructure, our accounting and
business systems and disaster recovery procedures are in need of
upgrades and replacements. Failure to implement these updates and
upgrades could result in systems failures, inability to promptly
recover from system failures, and data security risks. We
anticipate incurring significant expenses in upgrading and
replacing technology infrastructure and business systems over the
next three years. Our financial performance may be materially and
adversely impacted by material investments in new technology
infrastructure and business systems.
We are dependent upon third
parties for certain support services and should they fail to
perform, our financial performance could be materially and
adversely affected. We rely on various third parties to
provide certain support services. Should a third party fail to
perform or perform adequately, our financial performance could be
materially and adversely affected.
We are
exposed to risks associated with overseas
operations. We
currently maintain website, software development and operations in
Guatemala. These overseas operations are subject to many
inherent risks, including but not limited to:
●
Political
and social instability;
●
Exposure
to different business practices and legal standards, particularly
with respect to labor and employment laws and intellectual
property;
●
Continuation
of overseas conflicts and the risk of terrorist attacks and
resulting heightened security;
●
The
imposition of governmental controls and restrictions and unexpected
changes in regulatory requirements;
●
Theft
and other crimes;
●
Nationalization
of business and blocking of cash flows;
●
Changes
in taxation and tariffs;
●
Difficulties
in staffing and managing international operations; and
●
Foreign
currency exchange fluctuations.
These
risks can significantly impact our overseas operations and
outsourcing. Increases in the cost, or disruptions, of such
operations and outsourcing, could materially and adversely affect
our financial performance. In addition, we are subject
to certain anti-corruption laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act, in addition to the laws of the foreign countries in
which we operate. If we or any of our employees or agents violates
these laws, we could become subject to sanctions or significant
penalties that could negatively affect our reputation and financial
performance.
We may
acquire other companies, and there are many risks associated with
acquisitions. As part of our
business strategy we evaluate potential acquisitions that we
believe will complement or enhance our existing business. We
currently do not have any definitive agreements to acquire any
company or business, and we may not be able to identify or complete
any acquisition in the future. Acquisitions involve
numerous risks that include the following, any of which could
materially and adversely affect our financial
performance:
●
We
may not fully realize all of the anticipated benefits of an
acquisition or may not realize them in the timeframe expected,
including due to acquisitions where we expand into product and
service offerings or enter or expand into markets in which we are
not experienced;
●
In
order to complete acquisitions, we may issue common stock or
securities convertible into or exercisable for common stock,
potentially creating dilution for existing stockholders. Issuance
of equity securities may also restrict utilization of net operating
loss carryforwards because of an annual limitation due to ownership
change limitations under the Internal Revenue Code;
●
We
may borrow to finance acquisitions, and the amount and terms of any
potential future acquisition-related or other borrowings may not be
favorable to the Company and could affect our liquidity and
financial condition;
●
Acquisitions
may result in significant costs and expenses and charges to
earnings, including those related to severance pay, early
retirement costs, employee benefit costs, goodwill and asset
impairment charges, charges from the elimination of duplicative
facilities and contracts, assumed litigation and other liabilities,
legal, accounting and financial advisory fees, and required
payments to executive officers and key employees under retention
plans;
●
Our
due diligence process may fail to identify significant issues with
an acquired company that may result in unexpected or increased
costs, expenses or liabilities that could make an acquisition less
profitable or unprofitable;
●
The
failure to further our strategic objectives that may require us to
expend additional resources to develop products, services and
technology internally;
●
An
announced business combination and investment transaction may not
close timely or at all, which may cause our financial results to
differ from expectations in a given quarter; and
●
Business
combination and investment transactions may lead to litigation that
can be costly to defend or settle, even if no actual liability
exists.
●
Integrations
of acquisitions are often complex, time-consuming and expensive,
and if acquisitions are not successfully integrated they could
materially and adversely affect our financial performance. The
challenges involved with integration of acquisitions
include:
o
Diversion
of management attention to assimilating the acquired business from
other business operations and concerns;
o
Integration
of management information and accounting systems of the acquired
business into our systems, and the failure to fully realize all of
the anticipated benefits of an acquisition;
o
Difficulties
in assimilating the operations and personnel of an acquired
business into our own business;
o
Difficulties
in integrating management information and accounting systems of an
acquired business into our current systems;
o
Convincing
our customers and suppliers and the customers and suppliers of the
acquired business that the transaction will not diminish client
service standards or business focus and that they should not defer
purchasing decisions or switch to other suppliers;
o
Consolidating
and rationalizing corporate IT infrastructure, which may include
multiple legacy systems from various acquisitions and integrating
software code and business processes;
o
Persuading
employees that business cultures are compatible, maintaining
employee morale, retaining key employees and integrating employees
into the Company;
o
Coordinating
and combining administrative, manufacturing, research and
development and other operations, subsidiaries, facilities and
relationships with third parties in accordance with local laws and
other obligations while maintaining adequate standards, controls
and procedures; and
o
Managing
integration issues shortly after or pending the completion of other
independent transactions.
Securities Market Risks
The public
market for our common stock may be volatile, especially because
market prices for internet-related and technology stocks have often
been unrelated to operating
performance. Our
common stock is currently listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market under
the symbol “AUTO,” but we cannot assure that an active
trading market will be sustained or that the market price of the
common stock will not decline. The stock market in general
periodically experiences significant price fluctuations. The market
price of our common stock is likely to be highly volatile and could
be subject to wide fluctuations in response to factors such
as:
●
Actual
or anticipated variations in our quarterly operating
results;
●
Historical
and anticipated operating metrics such as the number of
participating Dealers, volume of Lead deliveries to Dealers, the
number of visitors to Company Websites and the frequency with which
they interact with Company Websites;
●
Announcements
of new product or service offerings;
●
Technological
innovations;
●
Low
trading volumes;
●
Concentration
of holdings in our common stock resulting in low public float for
our shares;
●
Decisions
by holders of large blocks of our stock to sell their holdings on
accelerated time schedules, including by reason of their decision
to liquidate investment funds that hold our stock;
●
Limited
analyst coverage of the Company;
●
Competitive
developments, including actions by Manufacturers;
●
Changes in financial estimates by securities analysts or our
failure to meet such estimates;
●
Conditions and trends in the internet, electronic commerce
and automotive industries;
●
Adoption of new accounting standards affecting the
technology or automotive industry;
●
Rumors,
whether or not accurate, about us, our industry or possible
transactions or other events;
●
The impact of open market repurchases of our common stock;
and
●
General market or economic conditions and other
factors.
Further,
the stock markets, and in particular The Nasdaq Capital Market,
have experienced price and volume fluctuations that have
particularly affected the market prices of equity securities of
many technology companies and have often been unrelated or
disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies.
These broad market factors have affected and may adversely affect
the market price of our common stock. In addition, general
economic, political and market conditions, such as recessions,
interest rates, energy prices, international currency fluctuations,
terrorist acts, political revolutions, military actions or wars,
may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. In the
past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a
company’s securities, securities class action litigation has
often been instituted against companies with publicly traded
securities.
Our common
stock could be delisted from The Nasdaq Capital Market if we are
not able to satisfy continued listing requirements, in which case
the price of our common stock and our ability to raise
additional capital and issue equity-based compensation may be
adversely affected, and trading in our stock may be less orderly
and efficient. For our common
stock to continue to be listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market, the
Company must satisfy various continued listing requirements
established by The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC. In the event the
Company were not able to satisfy these continued listing
requirements, we expect that our common stock would be quoted on an
over-the-counter market. These markets are generally
considered to be less efficient and less broad than The Nasdaq
Capital Market. Investors may be reluctant to invest in the common
stock if it is not listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market or another
stock exchange. Delisting of our common stock could have a material
adverse effect on the price of our common stock and would also
eliminate our ability to rely on the preemption of state securities
registration and qualification requirements afforded by Section 18
of the Securities Act of 1933 for “covered securities.”
The loss of this preemption could result in higher costs associated
with raising capital, could limit resale of our stock in some
states, and could adversely impact our ability to issue
equity-based compensation to Company employees.
No
assurances can be given that the Company will continue to be able
to meet the continued listing requirements for listing of our
common stock on The Nasdaq Capital Market.
Risks Associated with Litigation
Misappropriation
or infringement of our intellectual property and proprietary
rights, enforcement actions to protect our intellectual property
and claims from third parties relating to intellectual property
could materially and adversely affect our financial
performance. Litigation
regarding intellectual property rights is common in the internet
and technology industries. We expect that internet technologies and
software products and services may be increasingly subject to third
party infringement claims as the number of competitors in our
industry segment grows and the functionality of products in
different industry segments overlaps. Our
ability to compete depends upon our proprietary systems and
technology. While we rely on trademark, trade secret,
patent and copyright law, confidentiality agreements and technical
measures to protect our proprietary rights, we believe that the
technical and creative skills of our personnel, continued
development of our proprietary systems and technology, brand name
recognition and reliable website maintenance are more essential in
establishing and maintaining a leadership position and
strengthening our brands. Despite our efforts to protect our
proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy
aspects of our services or to obtain and use information that we
regard as proprietary. Policing unauthorized use of our proprietary
rights is difficult and may be expensive. We have no assurance that
the steps taken by us will prevent misappropriation of technology
or that the agreements entered into for that purpose will be
enforceable. Effective trademark, service mark, patent, copyright
and trade secret protection may not be available when our products
and services are made available online. In addition, if litigation
becomes necessary to enforce or protect our intellectual property
rights or to defend against claims of infringement or invalidity,
this litigation, even if successful, could result in substantial
costs and diversion of resources and management
attention. We also have no assurances that our products
and services do not infringe on the intellectual property rights of
third parties. Claims of infringement, even if unsuccessful, could
result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and
management attention. If we are not successful, we may be subject
to preliminary and permanent injunctive relief and monetary damages
which may be trebled in the case willful
infringements.
Our
financial performance could be adversely affected by actions of
third parties that could subject us to
litigation. We could
face liability for information retrieved or obtained from or
transmitted over the internet by third parties and liability for
products sold over the internet by third parties. We could be
exposed to liability with respect to third party information that
may be accessible through our websites, links or vehicle review
services. These claims might, for example, be made for defamation,
negligence, patent, copyright or trademark infringement, personal
injury, breach of contract, unfair competition, false advertising,
invasion of privacy or other legal theories based on the nature,
content or copying of these materials. These claims might assert,
among other things that, by directly or indirectly providing links
to websites operated by third parties we should be liable for
copyright or trademark infringement or other wrongful actions by
such third parties through those websites. It is also possible
that, if any third party content provided on our websites contains
errors, consumers could make claims against us for losses incurred
in reliance on such information. Any claims could result in costly
litigation, divert management’s attention and resources,
cause delays in releasing new or upgrading existing services or
require us to enter into royalty or licensing
agreements.
We
also enter into agreements with other companies under which any
revenues that results from the purchase or use of services through
direct links to or from our websites or on our websites is shared.
In addition, we acquire personal information and data in the form
of Leads purchased from third party websites involving consumers
who submitted personally identifiable information and data to the
third parties and not directly to us. These arrangements may expose
us to additional legal risks and uncertainties, including disputes
with these parties regarding revenue sharing, local, state and
federal government regulation and potential liabilities to
consumers of these services, even if we do not provide the services
ourselves or have direct contact with the consumer. These
liabilities can include liability for violations by these third
parties of laws, rules and regulations, including those related to
data security and privacy laws and regulations; unsolicited email,
text messaging, telephone or wireless voice marketing; and
licensing. We have no assurance that any indemnification provided
to us in our agreements with these third parties, if available,
will be adequate.
Our
financial performance could be materially and adversely affected by
other litigation. From time to time, we are involved in
litigation or legal matters not related to intellectual property
rights and arising from the normal course of our business
activities. The actions filed against us and other litigation or
legal matters, even if not meritorious, could result in substantial
costs and diversion of resources and management attention and an
adverse outcome in litigation could materially and adversely affect
our financial performance. Our liability insurance may not cover
all potential claims to which we are exposed and may not be
adequate to indemnify us for all liability that may be imposed. Any
imposition of liability that is not covered by insurance or is in
excess of our insurance coverage could have a material adverse
effect on our financial performance.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, tax benefit
preservation plan and Delaware law contain provisions that could
discourage a third party from acquiring us or limit the price third
parties are willing to pay for our stock.
Provisions
of our restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws relating to
our corporate governance and provisions in our Tax Benefit
Preservation Plan could make it difficult for a third party to
acquire us, and could discourage a third party from attempting to
acquire control of us. These provisions could limit the price that
some investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of
our common stock and may have the effect of delaying or preventing
a change in control. The issuance of preferred stock also could
decrease the amount of earnings and assets available for
distribution to the holders of common stock or could adversely
affect the rights and powers, including voting rights, of the
holders of the common stock.
Our
restated certificate of incorporation allows us to issue preferred
stock with rights senior to those of the common stock without any
further vote or action by the stockholders. Our restated
certificate of incorporation also provides that the board of
directors is divided into three classes, which may have the effect
of delaying or preventing changes in control or change in our
management because less than a majority of the board of directors
are up for election at each annual meeting. In addition, provisions
in our restated certificate of incorporation and
bylaws:
●
Require
that actions to be taken by our stockholders may be taken only at
an annual or special meeting of our stockholders and not by written
consent;
●
Specify
that special meetings of our stockholders can be called only by our
board of directors, a committee of the board of directors, the
Chairman of our board of directors or our President;
●
Establish
advance notice procedures for stockholders to submit nominations of
candidates for election to our board of directors and other
proposals to be brought before a stockholders meeting;
●
Provide
that our bylaws may be amended by our board of directors without
stockholder approval;
●
Allow
our board of directors to establish the size of our board of
directors;
●
Provide
that vacancies on our board of directors or newly created
directorships resulting from an increase in the number of our
directors may be filled only by a majority of directors then in
office, even though less than a quorum; and
●
Do
not give the holders of our common stock cumulative voting rights
with respect to the election of directors.
These
provisions could make it more difficult for stockholders to effect
corporate actions such as a merger, asset sale or other change in
control of us.
Under our Tax Benefit Preservation Plan, rights to
purchase capital stock of the Company (“Rights”) have been distributed as a dividend at
the rate of five Rights for each share of common
stock. Each Right entitles its holder, upon triggering
of the Rights, to purchase one one-hundredth of a share of Series A
Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the Company at a price of
$73.00 (as this price may be adjusted under the Tax Benefit
Preservation Plan) or, in certain circumstances, to instead acquire
shares of common stock. The Rights will convert into a right to
acquire common stock or other capital stock of the Company in
certain circumstances and subject to certain
exceptions. The Rights will be triggered upon the
acquisition of 4.90% or more of the Company’s outstanding
common stock or future acquisitions by any existing holders of
4.90% or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock. If a
person or group acquires 4.90% or more of our common stock, all
Rights holders, except the acquirer, will be entitled to acquire at
the then exercise price of a Right that number of shares of our
common stock which, at the time, has a market value of two times
the exercise price of the Right. The Tax Benefit
Preservation Plan authorizes our board of directors to exercise
discretionary authority to deem a person acquiring common stock in
excess of 4.90% not to be an “Acquiring Person” under
the Tax Benefit Preservation Plan, and thereby not trigger the
Rights, if the Board finds that the beneficial ownership of the
shares by the person acquiring the shares will not be likely
to directly or indirectly limit the availability to the Company of
the net operating loss carryovers and other tax attributes that the
plan is intended to preserve or is otherwise in the best
interests of the Company.
We
are also subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law. In general, the statute prohibits a publicly-held
Delaware corporation from engaging in a “business
combination” with an “interested stockholder” for
a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which
the person became an interested stockholder, unless the business
combination is approved in a prescribed manner. For purposes of
Section 203, a “business combination” includes a
merger, asset sale or other transaction resulting in a financial
benefit to the interested stockholder, and an “interested
stockholder” is a person who, together with affiliates and
associates, owns or did own 15% or more of the corporation’s
voting stock. Section 203 could discourage a third party from
attempting to acquire control of us.
If our internal controls and procedures fail, our financial
condition, results of operations and cash flow could be materially
and adversely affected.
Pursuant
to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, management is responsible for
establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting. Our internal controls over financial reporting
are processes designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. A material weakness is a control
deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in
a more than remote likelihood that a material misstatement of
annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or
detected. Our ability to report our financial results on a timely
and accurate basis could be adversely affected by a failure in our
internal control over financial reporting. If our financial
statements are not fairly presented, investors may not have an
accurate understanding of our operating results and financial
condition. If our financial statements are not timely filed with
the SEC, we could be delisted from The Nasdaq Capital Market. If
either or both of these events occur, it could have a material
adverse effect on our ability to operate our business and the
market price of our common stock. In addition, a failure in our
internal control over financial reporting could materially and
adversely affect our financial performance.
Our
internal controls may not prevent all potential errors or fraud.
Any control system, no matter how well designed and implemented,
can only provide reasonable and not absolute assurance that the
objectives of the control system will be achieved. We, or our
independent registered public accountants, may identify material
weaknesses in our internal controls which could adversely affect
our ability to ensure proper financial reporting and could affect
investor confidence in us and the price of our common shares. We
previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2017, and in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q
for each interim period in 2018, material weaknesses in our
internal control over financial reporting in respect to
(i) evaluation and measurement of goodwill for impairment and
(ii) valuation of deferred tax assets. Management implemented a
number of remediation actions as discussed in Part II, Item 9A of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and has had sufficient time to
test the design and operating effectiveness during the three months
ended December 31, 2018. As such, management has
concluded that the material weaknesses described above were
remediated as of December 31, 2018.
If we lose our key personnel or are unable to attract, train and
retain additional highly qualified sales, marketing, managerial and
technical personnel, our business may suffer.
Our
future success depends on our ability to identify, hire, train and
retain highly qualified sales, marketing, managerial and technical
personnel. In addition, as we introduce new services we may
need to hire additional personnel. We may not be able to attract,
assimilate or retain such personnel in the future. The inability to
attract and retain the necessary executive, managerial, technical,
sales and marketing personnel could have a material adverse effect
on our financial performance.
Our
business and operations are substantially dependent on the
performance of our executive officers and key
employees. Each of these executive officers could be
difficult to replace. There is no guarantee that these or any
of our other executive officers and key employees will remain
employed with us. The loss of the services of one or more of our
executive officers or key employees could have a material adverse
effect on our financial performance.
Qualified
individuals are in high demand, and we may incur significant costs
to attract and retain them. In order to attract and retain
executives and other key employees in a competitive marketplace, we
must provide competitive compensation packages, including cash and
stock-based compensation. Our primary forms of stock-based
incentive awards are stock options and restricted stock. If the
anticipated value of such stock-based incentive awards does not
materialize, if our stock-based compensation otherwise ceases to be
viewed as a valuable benefit, or if our total compensation package
is not viewed as being competitive, our ability to attract, retain
and motivate executives and key employees could be
weakened.
Our
current executives may view the business differently than prior
members of management, and over time may make changes to our
strategic focus, operations or business plans with corresponding
changes in how we report our results of operations. We can make no
assurances that our current executives will be able to
properly manage any such shift in focus or that
any changes to our business would ultimately prove
successful. We cannot ensure that we will be able to retain the
services of any members of our senior management or other key
employees. If we do not succeed in attracting well-qualified
employees, retaining and motivating existing employees or
integrating new executives and employees, our business could be
materially and adversely affected.
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
Not
applicable.
Item 2.
Properties
Our
headquarters are located in Irvine, California. Our headquarters
consist of approximately 33,000 square feet of leased office space
under a lease that expires in July 2020. Our Tampa, Florida
SEM operations are located in offices consisting of approximately
13,000 square feet under a lease that expires in May 2024. Our
website development operations located in Guatemala City, Guatemala
occupy approximately 10,000 square feet of leased office space
under leases that expire in March 2020. We also have other
operations located in Boston, Massachusetts under a 2,000 square
foot office lease expiring in October 2020. We believe that our
existing facilities are adequate to meet our needs and that
existing needs and future growth can be accommodated by leasing
alternative or additional space.
Item
3.
Legal Proceedings
From
time to time, we may be involved in litigation matters arising from
the normal course of our business activities. Litigation, even if
not meritorious, could result in substantial costs and diversion of
resources and management attention, and an adverse outcome in
litigation could materially adversely affect our business, results
of operations, financial condition, cash flows, earnings per
share and stock price.
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
Not
applicable.
PART II
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Our
common stock, par value $0.001 per share, is listed on The Nasdaq
Capital Market and trades under the symbol
“AUTO.”
As
of March 5, 2019, there were 174 holders of record of our common
stock. We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our
common stock and we do not expect to pay any cash dividends in the
foreseeable future. Payment of any future dividends will
depend on our earnings, cash flows and financial condition and will
be subject to legal and contractual restrictions.
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data
The
tables below set forth our selected consolidated financial
data. We prepared this information using the
consolidated financial statements of AutoWeb for the five years
ended December 31, 2018. Certain amounts in the selected
consolidated financial data have been reclassified to conform to
the current year presentation. You should read
these selected consolidated financial data together with the
Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K and also Item 7, “Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.”
|
Years ended December 31,
|
||||
|
2018 (1)
|
2017 (2)
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
|
(Amounts in thousands, except per-share data)
|
||||
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenues
|
$125,589
|
$142,125
|
$156,684
|
$133,226
|
$106,278
|
Net
income (loss)
|
$(38,816)
|
$(64,964)
|
$3,871
|
$4,646
|
$3,411
|
Basic
earnings (loss) per common share
|
$(3.04)
|
$(5.48)
|
$0.36
|
$0.47
|
$0.38
|
Diluted
earnings (loss) per common share
|
$(3.04)
|
$(5.48)
|
$0.29
|
$0.37
|
$0.32
|
Weighted
average diluted shares
|
12,756
|
11,853
|
13,303
|
12,662
|
11,212
|
(1)
Net loss in 2018
included DealerX license
intangible asset impairment of $9.0 million, goodwill impairment of
$5.1 million and customer relationship intangible asset impairment
of $1.6 million.
(2)
Net
loss in 2017 included goodwill impairment of $37.7 million and
$16.7 million recording of an income tax valuation
allowance.
|
Years ended December 31,
|
||||
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
2015
|
2014
|
|
(Amounts in thousands)
|
||||
FINANCIAL
POSITION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$13,600
|
$24,993
|
$38,512
|
$23,993
|
$20,747
|
Total
assets
|
$57,416
|
$92,913
|
$165,281
|
$153,588
|
$104,749
|
Non-current
liabilities
|
$—
|
$9,000
|
$16,500
|
$21,750
|
$11,061
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
$(327,716)
|
$(288,900)
|
$(230,424)
|
$(234,295)
|
$(238,941)
|
Stockholders’
equity
|
$33,515
|
$67,167
|
$119,609
|
$108,201
|
$69,258
|
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
You
should read the following discussion of our results of operations
and financial condition in conjunction with the “Risk
Factors” included in Part I, Item 1A and our
Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes thereto
included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. See also the discussion of
“Forward-Looking Statements” immediately preceding Part
I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Overview
As
reflected under the section “Results of Operations” in this
Item 7, the decline in total revenue for 2018 compared to 2017 was
primarily due to less efficient traffic acquisition, lower retail
dealer count and lead volumes, a decrease in click revenue caused
by lower pricing per click, and a decrease in display advertising
revenues from a decline in traffic to our websites. We believe that
a large part of the inefficiency in traffic acquisition was the
result of increased traffic acquisition costs as we invest in new
traffic acquisition strategies, as well as the consumer shift to
mobile and our ability to efficiently convert traffic to leads.
Cost of revenues increased compared to 2017 primarily due to
increased traffic acquisition costs associated with both lead and
click volume. Gross profit decreased compared to 2017 due to
decreased revenue and increased cost of revenues reflected in the
need to need to improve cost of revenue efficiency, with the major
contributor to the increase in cost of revenues being the one-time
impairment charge related to the DealerX License Agreement. As a
percentage of total revenue, gross profit declined for 2018
compared to 2017, driven primarily by the decline in total
revenues, increased traffic acquisition costs and the DealerX
License Agreement impairment charge.
During
the third quarter of 2018, we completed a comprehensive review of
our products, traffic acquisition, pricing policies, distribution
channels, technology infrastructure, strategic positioning and
organizational capabilities. This review involved a significant
change in key management and organizational structure. We moved
into the fourth quarter of 2018 and the first quarter of 2019 with
a plan that we intend to execute strategically. We will continue to
work with our traffic partners to optimize our SEM methodologies
and rebuild our high-quality traffic streams. We also expect to
invest in new product development and technology infrastructure,
and to continue to restructure our organization to better align
with our revised strategy, which will likely result in material
costs. We have begun to deploy various initiatives to address these
issues, which began with addressing our lead generation
capabilities to stabilize the declines in the largest part of our
business, integrating our products to create a unified solution of
leads, clicks and emails, and building out the team to execute on
our strategy.
We
cannot provide an exact timeframe for resolution of these issues,
as we are early in the implementation of our revised strategy.
However, our plan is designed to enable us to grow impressions,
improve conversion, expand distribution, and increase capacity. We
believe that this focus, along with plans to develop new,
innovative products, will create opportunities for improved quality
of delivery and strengthen our position for revenue growth. We now
have our full senior leadership team in place. In addition to our
new chief executive officer, we added a new chief financial
officer, chief operating officer, chief technology officer and
chief people officer, which we believe should increase the pace of
change and improve operational execution. Through 2018, we largely
focused on stabilizing the leads business as it comprises the
majority of our revenue. Our next area of focus for 2019 will be on
our click traffic product.
During
2018, we began to mobile enable our core new car lead generation
websites, which led to improvements in conversion. Mobile
enablement will be a considerable area of focus for us throughout
2019 as we evolve our sites to deliver a better experience for
consumers to drive conversion. We anticipate that we will mobile
enable the rest of our lead generation sites sometime in 2019. We
also recently developed an approach to mobile enable our click
traffic product. This is a critical next step in our mobile
enablement plan. The click product allows us to more effectively
monetize visits to our websites. Further, it provides our clients
with a unique opportunity to engage consumers with relevant
messaging in a unique format. We are in the early stages of testing
of the mobile enablement of our click traffic product in the first
quarter of 2019. We made progress implementing new traffic
acquisition strategies and ramping our new click algorithm during
the fourth quarter of 2018. However, there is still work to be done
with the algorithm as we are seeing some benefits to revenue per
click but not our click through rate. Ultimately, mobile
optimization of our websites and products is the goal, and we still
have a good bit of work to do in this area.
Expanding on the automotive industry at large, we
expect total vehicle sales and the seasonally-adjusted annual rate
to be down in 2019. LMC Automotive has forecasted 2019 U.S. total
light vehicle sales and retail light-vehicle sales at 17.0 million
and 13.7 million, respectively,
representing declines in U.S. total light vehicle sales and retail
light-vehicle sales of 1.9% and 1.5%, respectively, over 2018
sales. AutoNews has reported that light vehicle sales are off to
the slowest start for a year since 2014, with year-to-date sales
down about 3%. We believe it will be difficult for Manufacturers to
maintain their historic volumes due to affordability challenges
with interest rates and overall less Manufacturer incentives.
However, we continue to believe we can operate well in this
environment as we believe Dealers will seek out their highest
return on investment marketing channels to drive sales. And with
our detailed attribution and product quality improvements, we
believe we will continue to have a strong place in their marketing
budgets as we believe we are one of the most efficient marketing
channels they have.
Although
we are not able at this time to disclose any guidance as to 2019
financial performance with detail or accuracy, we do anticipate
some level of volatility in our total revenues, cost of revenues,
gross profit, and gross margin for 2019. We expect incremental cash
burn to continue in the first half of 2019 as we invest in our
people, products and technology. Our plan is to improve our
liquidity and balance sheet through non-dilutive measures as we are
currently in discussions with various banks for the establishment
of a secured credit facility. We cannot provide any assurances that
we will be successful in obtaining this line of credit or if it
will be available to us on favorable terms.
Operating Metrics
We
evaluate several key operating metrics that we believe are
instrumental to understanding the direction of our business,
including lead traffic, volume and sourcing; retail dealer count
and lead capacity; click traffic, click volume and revenue per
click; and lead quality.
Lead Traffic, Volume and Sourcing. Lead traffic is the number of consumers who
visited our entire portfolio of owned lead websites during the
applicable review period. Lead volume means the total new and used
vehicle leads invoiced to retail and wholesale customers for the
applicable review period. Lead sourcing reflects the source of our
Leads, whether Internally-Generated Leads or
Non-Internally-Generated Leads acquired from third parties.
Although we are not able at this time to disclose guidance as to
2019 Lead traffic or Lead volume with any detail or accuracy, we do
anticipate some level of volatility in our Lead traffic and Lead
volume, and we anticipate that our Lead sourcing mix between
Internally-Generated Leads and Non-Internally Generated Leads will
vary as we balance quality and quantity of our core Lead
product.
Retail Dealer Count and Capacity. Retail dealer count means the number of franchised
dealers contracted for delivery of retail new vehicle Leads plus
the number of vehicle dealers (franchised or independent)
contracted for delivery of retail used vehicle
Leads.
Retail lead capacity
means the sum of the number of new and used vehicle Leads
contracted for by new or used retail vehicle Dealers that the
Dealers wish to receive each month (i.e., “targets”)
during the applicable review period. For 2019, we do not anticipate a straight-line
trajectory for our distribution metrics that include Dealer count
and Retail lead capacity as we continue to refine our strategy. We
believe we have work to do to refine our distribution channel
effectiveness and do a better job at ramping our relationships with
the top 150 dealer groups in the United States. We expect some
volatility for both dealer count and lead capacity during 2019 as
we continue to evolve our engagement model for both retail dealers
and the top 150 dealer groups.
Click Traffic and Volume and Revenue per Click. Click traffic means the total visits to
Company-owned click referral websites during the applicable review
period. Click volume means the number of times during the
applicable review period that consumers clicked on advertisements
on the Company’s click referral websites during the
applicable review period. Revenue per click means the total click
revenue divided by click volume for the applicable review
period. We anticipate that
click volume and revenue per click for the first quarter of 2019
will be down sequentially compared to the fourth quarter of 2018,
as the customer mix is too weighted in terms of non-endemic (i.e.,
non-automotive) advertisers. We intend to continue to focus on
shifting this mix back towards endemic (i.e., automotive)
advertisers, and we are taking steps in this direction. However,
this is an area that we believe will require several quarters of
focus to get performance back to a level that is representative of
what we believe is its true potential.
Lead Quality. Our business,
results of operations, and financial condition are impacted by the
volume and quality of our Leads. We measure Lead quality by the
conversion of Leads to actual vehicle sales, which we refer to as
the “buy rate.” Buy
rate is the percentage of the consumers submitting Leads that we
delivered to our customers represented by the number of these
consumers who purchased vehicles within ninety days of the date of
the Lead submission. We rely on detailed feedback from
Manufacturers and wholesale customers to confirm the performance of
our Leads. Our Manufacturer and other wholesale customers each
match the Leads we deliver to our customers against vehicle sales
to provide us with information about vehicle purchases by the
consumers who submitted Leads that we delivered to these customers.
We also obtain vehicle registration data from a third-party
provider. This information, together with our internal analysis
allows us to estimate the buy rate for the consumers who submitted
the Internally-Generated Leads that we delivered to our customers.
Based on the most current information and our internal analysis, we
have estimated that, on average, consumers who submit
Internally-Generated Leads that we deliver to our customers have an
estimated buy rate of approximately 17%. Buy rates that individual
Dealers may achieve can be impacted by factors such as the strength
of processes and procedures within the dealership to manage
communications and follow up with consumers.
Results of Operations
The
following table sets forth our results of operations as a
percentage of total revenues for the years ended December 31,
2018, 2017 and 2016 (certain percentages below may not sum due to
rounding):
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
||
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
Lead
fees
|
77.2%
|
75.3%
|
83.4%
|
Advertising
|
22.4
|
24.0
|
15.6
|
Other
revenues
|
0.4
|
0.7
|
1.0
|
Total
revenues
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
100.0
|
Cost
of revenues
|
80.7
|
69.9
|
63.0
|
Cost
of revenues - impairment
|
7.2
|
—
|
—
|
Gross
margin
|
12.2
|
30.1
|
37.0
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
Sales
and marketing
|
9.9
|
10.1
|
11.6
|
Technology
support
|
11.0
|
8.8
|
8.9
|
General
and administrative
|
12.8
|
8.5
|
9.4
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
3.9
|
3.4
|
3.2
|
Goodwill
impairment
|
4.1
|
26.5
|
—
|
Long-lived
asset impairment
|
1.6
|
—
|
—
|
Total
operating expenses
|
43.3
|
57.2
|
33.1
|
Operating
income (loss)
|
(31.1)
|
(27.1)
|
3.9
|
Interest
and other income (expense), net
|
0.2
|
(0.7)
|
0.4
|
(Loss)
income before income tax provision
|
(30.9)
|
(27.8)
|
4.3
|
Income
tax provision
|
—
|
17.9
|
1.8
|
Net
income (loss)
|
(30.9)%
|
(45.7)%
|
2.5%
|
Revenues
by groups of similar services and gross profits are as follows
(dollars in thousands):
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
2018 vs. 2017
Change
|
2017 vs. 2016
Change
|
||||
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
$
|
%
|
$
|
%
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lead
fees
|
$96,936
|
$107,045
|
$130,684
|
$(10,109)
|
(9)%
|
$(23,639)
|
(18)%
|
Advertising
|
28,169
|
34,142
|
24,508
|
(5,973)
|
(17)
|
9,634
|
39
|
Other
revenues
|
484
|
938
|
1,492
|
(454)
|
(48)
|
(554)
|
(37)
|
Total
revenues
|
125,589
|
142,125
|
156,684
|
(16,536)
|
(12)
|
(14,559)
|
(9)
|
Cost of
revenues
|
101,315
|
99,352
|
98,771
|
1,963
|
2
|
581
|
1
|
Cost of
revenues - impairment
|
9,014
|
—
|
—
|
9,014
|
100
|
—
|
—
|
Gross
profit
|
$15,260
|
$42,773
|
$57,913
|
$(27,513)
|
(64)%
|
$(15,140)
|
(26)%
|
2018 Compared to 2017
Lead
fees. Lead
fees revenues decreased $10.1 million, or 9%, compared to 2017
primarily due to less efficient traffic acquisition and lower
retail dealer count and lead volumes.
Advertising.
Advertising revenues decreased $6.0 million, or 17%, compared to
2017 due to a $4.9 million decrease in click revenue caused by
lower pricing per click, coupled with a $1.1 million decrease in
display advertising revenues from a decline in traffic to our
website.
Other
revenues. Other revenues decreased to $0.5 million compared
to 2017 primarily due to lower customer utilization of the SaleMove
product, which we ceased selling on November 30, 2018, and of our
Textshield product.
Cost of Revenues.
Cost of revenues consists of Lead and
traffic acquisition costs and other costs. Lead and traffic
acquisition costs consist of payments made to our third-party Lead
providers, including internet portals and online automotive
information providers, as well as SEM costs. Other cost of revenues
consists of fees paid to third parties for data and content,
including SEO activity, included on our properties, connectivity
costs, development costs related to our websites, compensation
related expense and technology license fees, server equipment
depreciation and technology amortization directly related to the
Company Websites. SEM, sometimes referred to as paid search
marketing, is the practice of bidding on keywords on search engines
to drive traffic to a website.
Cost of
revenues increased $2.0 million compared to 2017 primarily due to
increased traffic acquisition costs associated with both lead and
click volume.
Cost
of Revenues – Impairment. Cost of revenues-impairment
expense of $9.0 million was recorded in the quarter ended September
30, 2018 due to the Company’s decision to terminate the
support provisions of a perpetual license to use a third
party’s platform and technology for targeted online marketing
(“DealerX License
Agreement”). This significantly impacted the usability
of the domain and resulted in an impairment charge to the related
intangible asset. The Company did not have a comparable charge in
2017.
Gross Profit. Gross profit decreased
$27.5 million, or 64%, compared to 2017 due to decreased revenue
and increased cost of revenues as discussed above. The major
contributor to the increase in cost of revenues was the one-time
impairment charge related to the DealerX License Agreement of $9.0
million, or 7% of total revenues. As a percentage of total revenue,
gross profit was 12% and 30% for the years ended December 31, 2018
and 2017, respectively. The change was driven primarily by the
$16.5 million decline in total revenues, $2.0 million increase in
traffic acquisition costs and the $9.0 million impairment
charge.
2017 Compared to 2016
Lead fees. Lead fees decreased $23.6 million or 18% in 2017
compared to 2016. The decrease in Lead fees was a result of the
elimination of poor-quality traffic in the second quarter of 2017,
decreased Lead sales to Dealers combined with increased Dealer
churn and the disposal of our specialty finance leads product in
December 2016.
Advertising. The
$9.6 million or 39% increase in advertising revenues in 2017
compared to 2016 was primarily due to an increase in click revenue
as a result of both increased click volume and
pricing.
Other
revenues. Other
revenues decreased $0.6 million or 37% in 2017 compared to
2016. The decrease in other revenues was primarily due
to lower customer utilization of the mobile offerings and SaleMove
product.
Cost of Revenues.
The $0.6 million or 1% increase in
cost of revenues in 2017 compared to 2016 was primarily due to the
increased costs in traffic acquisition activity. Cost of revenues
increased as a percentage of total revenues as a result of the $0.6
million increase in cost of revenues and the $23.6 million, or 18%,
decrease in total revenues.
Operating
expenses, interest and other income (expense) and income tax
provision (benefit) were as follows (dollars in
thousands):
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
2018 vs. 2017
Change
|
2017 vs. 2016
Change
|
||||
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
%
|
|
%
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and
marketing
|
$12,419
|
$14,315
|
$18,118
|
$(1,896)
|
(13)%
|
$(3,803)
|
(21)%
|
Technology
support
|
13,838
|
12,567
|
13,986
|
1,271
|
10
|
(1,419)
|
(10)
|
General and
administrative
|
16,077
|
12,001
|
14,613
|
4,076
|
34
|
(2,612)
|
(18)
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
4,897
|
4,781
|
5,068
|
116
|
2
|
(287)
|
(6)
|
Goodwill
impairment
|
5,133
|
37,688
|
—
|
(32,555)
|
(86)
|
37,688
|
—
|
Long-lived
asset impairment
|
1,968
|
—
|
—
|
1,968
|
100
|
—
|
—
|
Total
operating expenses
|
$54,332
|
$81,352
|
$51,785
|
$(27,020)
|
(33)%
|
$29,567
|
57%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and
other income (expense), net
|
$250
|
$(946)
|
$558
|
$1,196
|
NM
% |
$(1,504)
|
NM
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax
provision (benefit)
|
$(6)
|
$25,439
|
$2,815
|
$(25,445)
|
(100)%
|
$22,624
|
NM
% |
NM
– Not meaningful
2018 Compared to 2017
Sales and
Marketing.
Sales and marketing expense includes
costs for developing our brand, personnel costs, and other costs
associated with Dealer sales, website advertising, Dealer support
and bad debt expense.
Sales
and marketing expense for the year ended December 31, 2018
decreased $1.9 million, or 13%, compared to the 2017 period
primarily due to lower headcount-related costs and media spend,
offset by severance costs.
Technology
Support.
Technology support includes
compensation, benefits, software licenses and other direct costs
incurred by the Company to enhance, manage, maintain, support,
monitor and operate the Company’s websites and related
technologies, and to operate the Company's internal technology
infrastructure.
Technology support
expense for the year ended December 31, 2018 increased $1.3
million, or 10%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2017. The
change was due primarily to severance and other headcount-related
costs, coupled with costs associated with realignment of the
information technology function in the quarter ended September 30,
2018.
General and
Administrative. General and administrative expense consists of
certain executive, financial, human resources, legal and facilities
personnel expenses and costs related to operating as a
publicly-traded company.
General
and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2018
increased $4.0 million, or 33%, compared to the 2017 period due
primarily to $1.4 million in severance-related costs associated
with the departure of the Company’s former chief executive
officer in April 2018, coupled with increased compensation-related
costs and professional fees.
Depreciation
and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense for
the year ended December 31, 2018 decreased $0.1 million to $4.9
million compared to $4.8 million in the 2017 period.
Goodwill impairment.
During the quarter ended March 31,
2018, the Company performed an evaluation of enterprise goodwill
for impairment due to the decline in the Company’s stock
price. The carrying value of the Company was higher than its fair
value based on market capitalization at that date and as a result,
a non-cash impairment charge of $5.1 million was recorded. The
prior year impairment analysis was completed in October 2017, which
resulted in an impairment charge of $37.7
million.
Long-lived asset
impairment. The Company records
impairment losses on long-lived assets when events and
circumstances indicate that the assets might be impaired. Events
that may indicate that the assets might be impaired include, but
are not limited to, a significant downturn in the economy, a loss
of a major customer or group of customers or a significant decrease
in the market value of an asset. During the third quarter of 2018,
the Company recorded an impairment of approximately $0.4 million
related to asset advances to SaleMove, Inc.
(“SaleMove”), which were determined to be
non-recoverable at September 30, 2018. In addition, approximately
$1.6 million was recorded as an impairment to customer
relationships related to a 2015 acquisition after an analysis
determined a significant percentage of acquired customers were no
longer part of the dealer base.
Interest and Other Income
(Expense), net. Interest and
other income (expense), net increased $1.2 million to net interest
and other income of $0.3 million for the year ended December 31,
2018 compared to net interest and other expense of $0.9 million in
the 2017 period. The change was due to a $0.7 million decrease in
interest expense due to the payoff of term loans and a revolving
line of credit during the fourth quarter of 2017 and the first
quarter of 2018, respectively. In addition, during the fourth
quarter of 2017, the Company recorded a $0.6 million loss on its
investment in GoMoto, Inc. (“GoMoto”).
Income tax provision
(benefit). Income tax benefit
was $6,000 for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to income
tax expense of $25.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.
The decrease in income tax expense was due to the impact of the
TCJA, which lowered the effective tax rate for the year ended
December 31, 2018 compared to the prior year period. In addition,
the TCJA limits the Company’s annual deduction for business
interest expense to an amount equal to 30% of the Company’s
“adjusted taxable income” (as defined in the Internal
Revenue Code) for the taxable year effective January 1, 2018. The
amount of any business interest not allowed as a deduction for any
taxable year may be carried forward indefinitely and utilized in
future years, subject to this and other applicable interest
deductibility limitations. Operating losses during the year ended
December 31, 2018 did not result in any tax benefit due as
valuation allowances were recorded against the deferred tax
assets.
2017 Compared to 2016
Sales and Marketing.
Sales and marketing expense for the
year ended December 31, 2017 decreased by $3.8 million or 21%
compared to the prior year, due to a decrease in overall headcount
related expenses.
Technology Support.
Technology support expense for the
year ended December 31, 2017 decreased by $1.4 million or 10%
compared to the prior year, primarily due to a decrease in
headcount related costs.
General and
Administrative. General and
administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2017
decreased by $2.6 million or 17% compared to the prior year. The
decrease was due to a decrease in headcount related
costs.
Depreciation and
Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense for the year
ended December 31, 2017 decreased $0.3 million or 6% from the year
ended December 31, 2016 primarily due to some intangible assets
becoming fully amortized during the year.
Goodwill impairment.
We evaluate the carrying value of
enterprise goodwill for impairment, at a minimum, on an annual
basis. During 2017, we performed our annual impairment test by
comparing the carrying value of the Company to its fair value based
on market capitalization at that date. As a result of this testing,
a non-cash impairment charge of $37.7 million was recorded during
2017.
Interest and Other Income
(Expense), net. Interest and
other (expense) was $0.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2017 compared to interest and other income of
$0.6 million for the year ended December 31,
2016. Interest expense was $0.8 million and $0.9 million
for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016,
respectively. The year ended December 31, 2017 included
an impairment charge of $0.6 million related to SaleMove. The year
ended December 31, 2016 also included gain on disposal of the
finance leads product of $2.2 million offset by a $0.8 million
write-off related to our investment in GoMoto.
Income tax
provision. Income
tax expense was $25.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2017
compared to income tax expense of $2.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2016. The Company’s effective tax
rate of (64.4)% for the year ended December 31, 2017 differed from
the federal statutory rate principally as a result of deferred tax
asset adjustments relating to the change in the U.S. federal rate,
goodwill impairment, and establishing additional valuation
allowances on our deferred tax assets. The Company’s
effective tax rate of 42.1% for the year ended December 31, 2016
differed from the federal statutory rate principally as a result of
deferred tax asset adjustments, state income taxes and permanent
non-deductible tax items.
Segment Information
We
conduct our business within one business segment, which is defined
as providing digital marketing services to the automotive
industry. Our operations are aggregated into a single
reportable operating segment based upon similar economic and
operating characteristics as well as similar
markets.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The
table below sets forth a summary of our cash flow for the years
ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 (dollars in
thousands):
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
||
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
$(2,920)
|
$11,488
|
$18,242
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(771)
|
(10,402)
|
(2,774)
|
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(7,702)
|
(14,605)
|
(949)
|
Our
principal sources of liquidity are our cash and cash equivalents
and our cashflows from operations. Our cash and cash equivalents
totaled $13.6 million as of December 31, 2018 compared to $25.0
million as of December 31, 2017.
On
June 7, 2012, September 17, 2014, and September 6, 2017, we
announced that the board of directors had authorized us to
repurchase up to $2.0 million, $1.0 million, and $3.0 million,
respectively, of our common stock. We repurchased 226,698 shares of
our common stock with an average price of $8.37 per share during
2017. No shares were repurchased during 2018 or 2016. The
authorization may be increased or otherwise modified, renewed,
suspended or terminated by us at any time, without prior
notice. We may repurchase our common stock from time to
time on the open market or in private transactions. Shares
repurchased under this program have been retired and returned to
the status of authorized and unissued shares. We funded
repurchases and anticipate that we would fund future repurchases
through the use of available cash. The repurchase
authorization does not obligate us to repurchase any particular
number of shares. The timing and actual number of
repurchases of additional shares, if any, under our stock
repurchase program will depend upon a variety of factors, including
price, market conditions, release of quarterly and annual earnings,
and other legal, regulatory, and corporate considerations at our
sole discretion. The impact of repurchases on our Tax
Benefit Preservation Plan, as amended, and on the our use of net
operating loss carryovers and other tax attributes if we were to
experience an “ownership change,” as defined in Section
382 of the Internal Revenue Code, is also a factor that we consider
in connection with share repurchases. As of December 31,
2018, $2.3 million remains available for stock repurchases under
the program.
The
Company’s credit facility agreement with MUFG Union Bank,
N.A. terminated on March 31, 2018, upon repayment of all
outstanding borrowings under the agreement.
We
believe that our cash and cash equivalents and cashflows from
operations will be sufficient to meet our working capital
requirements for the next 12 months. However, our future capital
requirements will depend on many factors, including but not limited
to, implementing new strategic plans, modernizing and upgrading our
technology and systems, pursuing business objectives and responding
to business opportunities, challenges or unforeseen circumstances,
developing new or improving existing products or services,
enhancing our operating infrastructure and acquiring complementary
businesses and technologies. To the extent that our existing
liquidity is insufficient to fund our future activities, we may
need to engage in equity or debt financings to secure additional
funds. However, additional funds may not be available when we need
them, on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all.
Net Cash Provided by (Used in)
Operating Activities. Net cash used in operating activities totaled $2.9
million for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to cash
provided of $11.5 million in the prior year. Net cash used in 2018
was due primarily to a net loss of $38.8 million, offset by a $16.1
million non-cash charge related to the impairment of goodwill and
intangible assets, $14.5 million in other non-cash expenses
including depreciation and share-based compensation, and a net
change in assets and liabilities of $5.3
million.
Net
cash provided by operating activities in 2017 of $11.5 million
resulted primarily from net loss of $65.0 million, adjustments for
non-cash charges to earnings of $75.9 million and an increase in
working capital.
Net Cash Used in Investing
Activities. Net cash
used in investing activities of $0.8 million in 2018 primarily
related to purchase of property and equipment and expenditures
related to capitalized internal use software of $0.9 million,
offset by $0.1 million in proceeds from the sale of the SaleMove
investment.
Net
cash used in investing activities of $10.4 million in 2017
primarily consisted of $1.8 million in purchases of property and
equipment and expenditures related to capitalized internal use
software and $8.6 million used to purchase intangible
assets.
Net Cash Used in Financing
Activities. Net cash used in
financing activities of $7.7 million in 2018 primarily consisted of
payments of $8.0 million to pay down the revolving credit facility
in March 2018, offset by proceeds of $0.3 million from the issuance
of common stock.
Net
cash used in financing activities of $14.6 million in 2017
consisted of payments on term loan borrowings of $14.1 million and
cash used to repurchase Company common stock of $1.9
million. Stock options for 248,344 shares of the
Company’s common stock were exercised in the year ended
December 31, 2017, resulting in $1.4 million of cash
inflow.
Contractual Obligations
The
following table provides aggregated information about our
outstanding contractual obligations as of December 31, 2018
(in thousands):
|
Total
|
Less than 1 year
|
1-3 years
|
3-5 years
|
More than 5 years
|
Long-term
Debt Obligations (a)
|
$1,000
|
$1,000
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
Operating
Lease Obligations (b)
|
4,208
|
1,497
|
1,581
|
931
|
199
|
Total
|
$5,208
|
$2,497
|
$1,581
|
$931
|
$199
|
(a)
Long-term
debt obligations as defined by ASC 470, “Debt,” and
disclosed in Note 6 of the consolidated financial statements
included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
(b)
Operating
lease obligations as defined by ASC 840, “Leases,” and
disclosed in Note 8 of the consolidated financial statements
included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We
do not have any material off-balance sheet
arrangements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our
significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 2 –
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8
- Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. We consider the
accounting policies described below to be critical in preparing our
consolidated financial statements. These policies require us to
make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of
certain assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related
disclosures of contingencies. Our assumptions, estimates and
judgments are based on historical experience, current trends and
other factors to be relevant at the time we prepare the
consolidated financial statements. Although our estimates and
assumptions are reasonable, we cannot determine future events.
Consequently, actual results could differ materially from our
assumptions and estimates.
Revenue Recognition.
Revenue is recognized when the Company
transfers control of promised goods or services to the
Company’s customers, or when the Company satisfies any
performance obligations under contract. The amount of revenue
recognized reflects the consideration the Company expects to be
entitled to in exchange for respective goods or services provided.
Further, under Accounting Standards Codification
(“ASC”) 606, Revenue from Contracts with
Customers, contract assets or contract liabilities that arise from
past performance but require further performance before obligation
can be fully satisfied must be identified and recorded on the
balance sheet until respective settlements have been
met.
The
Company performs the following steps in order to properly determine
revenue recognition and identify relevant contract assets and
contract
liabilities:
●
identify
the contract with a customer;
●
identify
the performance obligations in the contract;
●
determine
the transaction price;
●
allocate
the transaction price to the performance obligations in the
contract; and
●
recognize
revenue when, or as, the Company satisfies a performance
obligation.
The
Company earns revenue by providing Leads, advertising, and mobile
products and services used by Dealers and Manufacturers in their
efforts to market and sell new and used vehicles to consumers. The
Company enters into contracts that can include various combinations
of products and services, which are generally capable of being
distinct and accounted for as separate performance obligations. The
Company records revenue on distinct performance obligations at a
single point in time, when control is transferred to the
customer.
Allowances for Bad Debts and
Customer Credits. The allowance for bad debts is an estimate of bad
debt expense that could result from the inability or refusal of
customers to pay for services. Additions to the estimated allowance
for bad debts are recorded to sales and marketing expenses and are
based on factors such as historical write-off percentages, the
current business environment and known concerns within the current
aging of accounts receivable. Reductions in the estimated allowance
for bad debts due to subsequent cash recoveries are recorded as a
decrease in sales and marketing expenses. As specific bad debts are
identified, they are written-off against the previously established
estimated allowance for bad debts with no impact on operating
expenses.
The
allowance for customer credits is an estimate of adjustments for
services that do not meet the customer requirements. Additions to
the estimated allowance for customer credits are recorded as a
reduction of revenues and are based on the Company’s
historical experience of: (i) the amount of credits issued;
(ii) the length of time after services are rendered that the
credits are issued; (iii) other factors known at the time; and
(iv) future expectations. Reductions in the estimated allowance for
customer credits are recorded as an increase in revenues. As
specific customer credits are identified, they are written-off
against the previously established estimated allowance for customer
credits with no impact on revenues.
If
there is a decline in the general economic environment that
negatively affects the financial condition of the Company’s
customers or an increase in the number of customers that are
dissatisfied with their services, additional estimated allowances
for bad debts and customer credits may be required, and the impact
on the Company’s business, results of operations, financial
condition, earnings per share, cash flow or the trading price of
our stock could be material.
Capitalized Internal Use
Software and Website Development
Costs. The Company
capitalizes costs to develop internal use software in accordance
with ASC 350-40, Internal-Use Software, and ASC 350-50, Website
Development Costs, which require the capitalization of external and
internal computer software costs and website development costs,
respectively, incurred during the application development stage.
The application development stage is characterized by software
design and configuration activities, coding, testing and
installation. Training and maintenance costs are expensed as
incurred while upgrades and enhancements are capitalized if it is
probable that such expenditures will result in additional
functionality. Capitalized internal use software development costs
are amortized using the straight-line method over an estimated
useful life of three to five years. Capitalized website development
costs, once placed in service, are amortized using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the related
websites.
Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets and Intangible Assets. The Company periodically reviews long-lived
amortizing assets to determine if there is any impairment of these
assets. The Company assesses the impairment of these assets, or the
need to accelerate amortization, whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable. Judgments regarding the existence of impairment
indicators are based on legal factors, market conditions and
operational performance of the long-lived assets and other
intangibles. Future events could cause the Company to conclude that
impairment indicators exist and that the assets should be reviewed
to determine their fair value. The Company assesses the assets for
impairment based on the estimated future undiscounted cash flows
expected to result from the use of the assets and their eventual
disposition. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its
estimated future undiscounted cash flows, an impairment loss is
recorded for the excess of the asset’s carrying amount over
its fair value. Fair value is generally determined based on a
valuation process that provides an estimate of a fair value of
these assets using a discounted cash flow model, which includes
many assumptions and estimates. Once the valuation is determined,
the Company would write-down these assets to their determined fair
value, if necessary. Any write-down could have a material adverse
effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of
operations.
Share-Based
Compensation. The
Company grants restricted stock and stock option awards (the
“Awards”) under several of its share-based
compensation plans. The Company recognizes share-based
compensation based on the Awards’ fair value, net of
estimated forfeitures on a straight-line basis over the requisite
service periods, which is generally over the awards’
respective vesting period, or on an accelerated basis over the
estimated performance periods for options with performance
conditions. Restricted stock fair value is measured on the
grant date based on the quoted market price of the Company’s
common stock, and the stock option fair value is estimated on the
grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on
the underlying common stock closing price as of the date of grant,
the expected term, stock price volatility and risk-free interest
rates.
Income
Taxes. The Company
accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future
tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply
to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences
are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
income in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company
records a valuation allowance, if necessary, to reduce deferred tax
assets to an amount it believes is more likely than not to be
realized.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
See
Note 2 of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements” in Part II, Item 8, Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for recent
accounting pronouncements.
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk
The
Company does not use financial instruments for
trading.
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Our
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017
and our Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive
Income (Loss), Stockholders’ Equity and Cash Flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2018,
together with the report of our independent registered public
accounting firm, begin on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form
10-K and are incorporated herein by reference.
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have established and maintain disclosure
controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that material
information relating to the Company and its subsidiaries required
to be disclosed by us in the reports that are filed under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(“Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported in the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and
forms, and that this information is accumulated and communicated to
our management, including our chief executive officer and chief
financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures,
management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter
how well designed and operated, can provide only a reasonable
assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and
management was necessarily required to apply its judgment in
evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and
procedures.
Under
the supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer,
we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of
December 31, 2018. Based on this evaluation, the chief
executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that the
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective
as of December 31, 2018.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
Our
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule
13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) of the Exchange Act. The Company's
internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles.
The
Company's internal controls over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records
that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles; provide reasonable
assurance that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being
made only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the Company; and provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company's assets that could
have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal controls over financial
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements or fraud. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Under the supervision and with the participation
of management, including the Company’s chief executive
officer and chief financial officer, management conducted an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018. In
making this assessment, management used the framework established
in Internal
Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment,
management has concluded that the Company's internal control over
financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2018.
Management reviewed the results of its assessment with the Audit
Committee of the board of directors.
Remediation of Material Weaknesses in Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting
We
previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, and in our Quarterly Reports
on Form 10-Q for each interim period in 2018, material weaknesses
in our internal controls over financial reporting in evaluating and
measuring goodwill for impairment and valuation of deferred tax
assets. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of
deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such
that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement
of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented
or detected on a timely basis.
In
order to remediate the material weaknesses identified, we undertook
a number of actions with the oversight of the Audit Committee of
the Board of Directors. The following steps were taken to remediate
the conditions leading to the above stated material
weaknesses:
(i)
Material
weakness related to evaluation and measurement of goodwill
impairment:
●
Management has
implemented procedures to evaluate and review goodwill and other
intangibles, including review of reports prepared by third parties
for completeness and accuracy.
●
Management has
identified and designed key controls to include quantitative and
qualitative factors to indicate whether an impairment
exists.
(ii)
Material
weakness related to valuation of deferred tax assets:
●
Management has
implemented procedures to review third party prepared reports for
completeness and accuracy.
●
Management and the
third-party preparer discuss all significant elements of the
prepared reports with evidence of this review.
Management
has implemented the remediation actions discussed above and has
completed the testing of the design and operating effectiveness of
the new procedures and controls. As a result, as of
December 31, 2018, management concluded the Company has
remediated the previously reported material weaknesses in the
internal controls over financial reporting.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Other
than with respect to the material weaknesses discussed above that
were identified during the audit of fiscal year ended December 31,
2017 and subsequently remediated as of December 31, 2018, there
have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over
financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the
Exchange Act) during the three months ended December 31, 2018,
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
Item 9B.
Other Information
Not
applicable.
PART III
Information called for by the Items included under this Part III is
incorporated by reference to the sections listed below of our
definitive Proxy Statement for our 2019 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders that will be filed not later than 120 days after
December 31, 2018 (“2019 Proxy
Statement”).
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The
information called for by this Item 10 is incorporated by reference
to the following sections of the 2019 Proxy Statement:
“Proposal 1-Nomination and Election of Directors;”
“Board of Directors;” “Executive Officers;”
“Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance;” and the following paragraphs under the section
“Corporate Governance Matters,” “--Committees of
the Board of Directors—Audit Committee,” and
“--Code of Conduct and Ethics.”
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
The
information called for in this Item 11 is incorporated by reference
to the following sections of the 2019 Proxy Statement:
“Executive Compensation” and “Corporate
Governance Matters--Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation” and “--Board’s Role in Oversight
of Risk.”
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
The
information called for in this Item 12 is incorporated by reference
to the following sections of the 2019 Proxy Statement:
“Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management” and “Executive Compensation--Equity
Compensation Plans.”
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
The
information called for in this Item 13 is incorporated by reference
to the following sections of the 2019 Proxy Statement:
“Corporate Governance Matters--Certain Relationships and
Related Party Transactions” and “--Director
Independence.”
Item 14.
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The
information called for in this Item 14 is incorporated by reference
to the following sections of the 2019 Proxy Statement:
“Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and Audit
Committee Report--Principal Accountant Fees and Services,”
“--Audit Fees,” “--Audit Related Fees,” and
“--Pre-Approval Policy for Services.”
PART IV
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K:
(1)
Financial Statements:
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
(2)
Financial Statement Schedules:
All
other schedules have been omitted since the required information is
presented in the financial statements and the related notes or is
not applicable.
(3)
Exhibits:
The
exhibits filed or furnished as part of this Annual Report on Form
10-K are those listed in the following Exhibit Index.
EXHIBIT INDEX
Number
|
Description
|
|
|
Asset Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of
December 19, 2016 by and among Company, Car.com, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, and Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit
2.1 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 21, 2016 (SEC File No. 001-34761).
|
|
|
|
Sixth Restated Certificate of Incorporation of
AutoWeb, Inc. (filed with the Secretary of the State of Delaware on
October 9, 2017), incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3.4 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 10, 2017 (SEC File
No. 001-34761).
|
|
|
|
Seventh Amended and Restated Bylaws of AutoWeb
dated October 9, 2017, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit
3.5 to the
to the Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on October 10, 2017 (SEC File No.
001-34761).
|
|
|
|
Tax Benefit Preservation Plan dated as of May
26, 2010 between Company and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as
rights agent, together with the following exhibits thereto: Exhibit
A – Form of Right Certificate; and Exhibit B – Summary
of Rights to Purchase Shares of Preferred Stock of Company,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit
4.1 to
the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 2, 2010
(SEC File No. 000-22239), Amendment No. 1 to Tax Benefit
Preservation Plan dated as of April 14, 2014, between Company and
Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as rights agent, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit
4.1 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 16, 2014 (SEC File
No. 001-34761), Amendment No. 2 to Tax Benefit Preservation Plan
dated as of April 13, 2017, between Company and Computershare Trust
Company, N.A., as rights agent, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit
4.1 to
the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 14, 2017
(SEC File No. 001-34761).
|
|
|
|
Certificate of Adjustment Under Section 11(m) of
the Tax Benefit Preservation Plan, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit
4.3 to the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended September 30,
2012 filed with the SEC on November 8, 2012 (SEC File No.
001-34761).
|
|
|
|
10.1■
|
Autobytel.com Inc. 1999 Employee and Acquisition
Related Stock Option Plan, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit
10.1 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on
November 1, 1999 (SEC File No. 333-90045), as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated
December 5, 2001 to the Autobytel.com Inc. 1999 Employee and
Acquisition Related Stock Option Plan, and Form of Stock Option
Agreement under the Autobytel.com Inc. 1999 Employee and
Acquisition Related Stock Option Plan, incorporated by reference to
Exhibits (d)(10) and (d)(16),
respectively, to the Schedule TO-I filed with the SEC on December
14, 2001 (SEC File No. 005-58067), and Amendment No. 2 to the Autobytel.com Inc.
1999 Employee and Acquisition Related Stock Option Plan dated May
1, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.86 to the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended June
30, 2009 filed with the SEC on July 24, 2009 (SEC File No.
000-22239).
|
|
|
10.2■
|
Form of Employee Stock Option Agreement under
the Autobytel.com Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan
and the Autobytel.com
Inc. 1999 Employee and Acquisition Related Stock Option
Plan, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 3, 2008 (SEC File
No. 000-22239).
|
|
|
10.3■
|
Autobytel.com Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit
99.1 to the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on June 15,
2000 (SEC File No. 333-39396); as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated
December 5, 2001 to the Autobytel.com Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan
and Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Autobytel.com
Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan,
incorporated by reference to Exhibits (d)(12) and (d)(17),
respectively, to the Schedule TO-I, filed with the SEC on December
14, 2001 (SEC File No. 005-58067); Amendment No. 2 to the
Autobytel.com Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit
10.46 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2001 filed with
the SEC on March 22, 2002 (SEC File No.
000-22239); and as
amended by Amendment No. 3 to the Autobytel.com Inc. 2000 Stock
Option Plan dated May 1, 2009, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit
10.87 to the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Quarterly Period ended June 30, 2009 filed with the SEC on July
24, 2009 (SEC File No. 000-22239).
|
|
|
10.4■
|
Autobytel Inc. Amended and Restated 2001
Restricted Stock and Option Plan, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit
4.7 to the
Post-Effective Amendment to Registration Statement on Form S-8
filed with the SEC on July 31, 2003 (SEC File No.
333-67692); as amended by
Amendment No. 1 to the Autobytel Inc. Amended and Restated 2001
Restricted Stock and Option Plan dated May 1, 2009, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit
10.88 to the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Quarterly Period ended June 30, 2009 filed with the SEC on July
24, 2009 (SEC File No. 000-22239); and
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Autobytel Inc.
Amended and Restated 2001 Restricted Stock and Option Plan,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 3, 2008 (SEC File
No. 000-22239); Form of Employee Stock Option Agreement under the
Autobytel Inc. Amended and Restated 2001 Restricted Stock and
Option Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.8 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2014 filed with
the SEC on February 26, 2015 (SEC File No.
001-34761).
|
|
|
10.5■
|
Autobytel Inc. 2004 Restricted Stock and Option
Plan and Form of Employee Stock Option Agreement under the
Autobytel Inc. 2004 Restricted Stock and Option Plan, incorporated
by reference to Exhibits
4.8 and 4.9,
respectively, to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with
the SEC on June 28, 2004 (SEC File
No. 333-116930); as
amended by Amendment No. 1 to the Autobytel Inc. 2004 Restricted
Stock and Option Plan dated May 1, 2009, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit
10.89 to the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Quarterly Period ended June 30, 2009 filed with the SEC on July
24, 2009 (SEC File No. 000-22239); Form
of Outside Director Stock Option Agreement under the Autobytel Inc.
2004 Restricted Stock and Option Plan, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit
10.2 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 3, 2004 (SEC File
No. 000-22239); Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Autobytel
Inc. 2004 Restricted Stock and Option Plan, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit
10.65 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2004 filed with
the SEC on May 31, 2005 (SEC File No. 000-22239); and Form of
Outside Director Stock Option Agreement and Form of Letter
Agreement (amending
certain stock option agreements with Outside
Directors) under the 2004
Restricted Stock and Option Plan, incorporated by reference
to Exhibits
10.1 and 10.2 to
the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 14,
2005 (SEC File No. 000-22239).
|
|
|
10.6■
|
Autobytel Inc. 2006 Inducement Stock Option Plan
and Form of Employee
Inducement Stock Option Agreement, incorporated by reference
to Exhibits
4.9 and 4.10,
respectively, to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed
with the SEC on June 16, 2006 (SEC File No.
333-135076); and as amended by
Amendment No. 1 to the Autobytel Inc. 2006 Inducement Stock Option
Plan dated May 1, 2009, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit
10.90 to the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the Quarterly Period ended June 30, 2009 filed with the SEC on July
24, 2009 (SEC File No. 000-22239).
|
|
|
10.7■
|
Autobytel Inc. 2010 Equity Incentive Plan,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 25, 2010 (SEC File
No. 001-34761); Form of Employee Stock Option Award Agreement, Form
of 2012 Performance-Based Stock Option Award Agreement, Form of
Non-Employee Director Stock Option Award Agreement and Form of
(Management) Employee Stock Option Award Agreement under the
Autobytel Inc. 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by
reference to Exhibits 10.58, 10.59, 10.60 and 10.61,
respectively, to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended
December 31, 2011 filed with the SEC on March 1, 2012 (SEC File No.
001-34761); and Form of 2013 Performance-Based Stock Option Award
Agreement under the Autobytel Inc. 2010 Equity Incentive Plan,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.79 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2012 filed with
the SEC on February 28, 2013 (SEC File No.
001-34761).
|
|
|
10.8■
|
AutoWeb, Inc. (formerly Autobytel Inc.) 2014
Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit
10.1 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 23, 2014 (SEC File
No. 001-34761); Amended and Restated AutoWeb, Inc. (formerly
Autobytel Inc.) 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (supersedes and replaces
the AutoWeb, Inc. (formerly Autobytel Inc.) 2014 Equity Incentive
Plan filed under Exhibit
10.1 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 23, 2014 (SEC File
No. 001-34761), incorporated by reference
to Exhibit
10.11 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2017 filed with
the SEC on March 15, 2018 (SEC File No. 001-34761); Form of
Non-Employee Director Stock Option Award Agreement under the
Amended and Restated AutoWeb, Inc. (formerly Autobytel Inc.) 2014
Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.12 on the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year
Ended December 31, 2017 filed with the SEC on March 15, 2018 (SEC
File No. 001-34761); Form of Executive Stock Option Award Agreement
under the Amended and Restated AutoWeb, Inc. (formerly Autobytel
Inc.) 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.13
on the Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the Year Ended December 31, 2017 filed with the SEC on March
15, 2018 (SEC File No. 001-34761); Form of Non-Executive Employee
Stock Option Award Agreement under the Amended and Restated
AutoWeb, Inc. (formerly Autobytel Inc.) 2014 Equity Incentive Plan,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 on the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year
Ended December 31, 2017 filed with the SEC on March 15, 2018 (SEC
File No. 001-34761); Form of Subsidiary Employee Stock Option Award
Agreement under the Amended and Restated AutoWeb, Inc. (formerly
Autobytel Inc.) 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit
10.15 on the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2017 filed with the SEC
on March 15, 2018 (SEC File No. 001-34761); Form of Restricted
Stock Award Agreement under the Amended and Restated AutoWeb, Inc.
(formerly Autobytel Inc.) 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated
by reference to Exhibit
10.16 on the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2017 filed with the SEC
on March 15, 2018 (SEC File No. 001-34761).
|
|
|
AutoWeb, Inc. 2018 Equity Incentive Plan,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 on the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
SEC on June 27, 2018 (SEC File No. 001-34761).
|
|
|
|
Form of Non-Employee Director Stock Option Award
Agreement (Non-Qualified Stock Option) under the AutoWeb, Inc. 2018
Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.8 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarterly Period ended June 30, 2018 filed with the SEC on August
2, 2018 (SEC File No. 001-34761).
|
|
|
|
Form of Employee Stock Option Award Agreement
(Non-Qualified Stock Option) (Executive) under the AutoWeb, Inc.
2018 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.9 on the Quarterly Period ended June 30, 2018
filed with the SEC on August 2, 2018 (SEC File No.
001-34761).
|
|
|
|
Form of Employee Stock Option Award Agreement
(Non-Qualified Stock Option) (Non-Executive) under the AutoWeb,
Inc. 2018 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.10
on the Quarterly Period ended June
30, 2018 filed with the SEC on August 2, 2018 (SEC File No.
001-34761).
|
|
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under
the AutoWeb, Inc. 2018 Equity Incentive Plan, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit
10.11 on the Quarterly Period
ended June 30, 2018 filed with the SEC on August 2, 2018 (SEC File
No. 001-34761).
|
|
|
|
10.14■
|
Form of Amended and Restated Indemnification
Agreement between Company and its directors and officers,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit
99.1 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 22, 2010 (SEC File
No. 001-34761).
|
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between the
Company and its directors and officers, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit
10.24 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2017 filed with
the SEC on March 15, 2018 (SEC File No.
001-34761).
|
|
|
|
Employment Agreement between Jared Rowe and
AutoWeb, Inc. dated April 12, 2018, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit
10.1 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 18, 2018 (SEC File
No. 001-34761).
|
|
|
|
Inducement Stock Option Award Agreement between
Jared Rowe and AutoWeb, Inc. dated April 12, 2018,
incorporated by reference
to Exhibit
10.2 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 18, 2018 (SEC File
No. 001-34761).
|
|
|
|
10.18■
|
Letter Agreement dated October 10, 2006 between
Company and Glenn Fuller, as amended by Memorandum dated April 18,
2008, Memorandum dated as of December 8, 2008, and Memorandum dated
as of March 1, 2009, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit
10.77 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2008 filed with
the SEC on March 13, 2009 (SEC File No. 000-22239); and as amended
by Memorandum dated January 31, 2017, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit
10.13 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2016 filed with
the SEC on March 9, 2017 (SEC File No.
001-34761).
|
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Severance Benefits
Agreement dated as of April 12, 2018 between Company and Glenn
Fuller, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed
with the SEC on May 10, 2018 (SEC File No.
001-34761).
|
|
|
|
10.20■*
|
Memorandum dated April 18, 2018 between Company and Glenn
Fuller.
|
|
|
Offer of Employment between Joseph Hannan and
Company dated November 21, 2018, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
SEC on December 17, 2018 (SEC File No.
001-34761).
|
|
|
|
Inducement Stock Option Award Agreement between
Joseph Hannan and Company dated December 17,
2018, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Current Report on
Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 17, 2018 (SEC File No.
001-34761).
|
|
|
|
Severance Benefits Agreement between Joseph
Hannan and Company dated December 17, 2018, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the
SEC on December 17, 2018 (SEC File No.
001-34761).
|
|
|
|
Offer of Employment between Daniel Ingle and
Company dated November 26, 2018, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1
to the Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on January 16, 2019 (SEC File No.
001-34761).
|
|
|
|
10.25■*
|
Inducement Stock Option Award Agreement dated as
of January 16, 2019 between Daniel Ingle and Company.
|
|
|
10.26■*
|
Severance Benefits Agreement dated January 16,
2019 between Daniel Ingle and Company.
|
|
|
Offer of Employment dated as of October 2, 2018
between Company and Sara Partin, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1
to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the Quarterly Period ended September 30, 2018 filed with the
SEC on November 8, 2018 (SEC File No.
001-34761).
|
|
|
|
Inducement Stock Option Award Agreement dated as
of October 22, 2018 between Company and Sara Partin, incorporated
by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended September 30, 2018
filed with the SEC on November 8, 2018 (SEC File No.
001-34761).
|
|
|
|
Severance Benefits Agreement dated October 22,
2018 between Company and Sara Partin, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.4
to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the Quarterly Period ended September 30, 2018 filed with the
SEC on November 8, 2018 (SEC File No.
001-34761).
|
|
|
|
10.30■*
|
Offer of Employment dated as of November 28, 2018
between Company and Timothy Branham.
|
|
|
10.31■*
|
Inducement Stock Option Award Agreement dated as
of December 17, 2018 between Company and Timothy
Branham.
|
|
|
10.32■*
|
Severance Benefits Agreement dated December 17,
2018 between Company and Timothy Branham.
|
|
|
10.33■
|
Letter Agreement dated August 6, 2004 between
Company and Wesley Ozima, as amended by Memorandum dated March 1,
2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.81 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2008 filed with
the SEC on March 13, 2009 (SEC File No. 000-22239); and as amended
by Memorandums dated January 22, 2016 and January 31, 2017,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.16 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2016 filed with
the SEC on March 9, 2017 (SEC File No.
001-34761).
|
|
|
10.34■
|
Amended and Restated Severance Agreement dated
as of November 15, 2008 between Company and Wesley Ozima,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.82 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2008 filed with
the SEC on March 13, 2009 (SEC File No. 000-22239); and as amended
by Amendment No. 1 dated October 16, 2012, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit
10.74 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2012 filed with
the SEC on February 28, 2013 (SEC File No.
001-34761).
|
|
|
10.35■
|
Stock Option Award Agreement under the Autobytel
Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan, Stock Option Award Agreement under the
Autobytel Inc. Amended and Restated 2001 Restricted Stock and
Option Plan, and Stock Option Award Agreement under the Autobytel
Inc. 2004 Restricted Stock and Option Plan each dated effective as
of April 3, 2009 between Company and Jeffrey H. Coats, incorporated
by reference to Exhibits
10.92, 10.93 and 10.94,
respectively, to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
Quarterly Period ended June 30, 2009 filed with the SEC on July 24,
2009 (SEC File No. 000-22239); Employee Stock Option Award
Agreement under the Amended and Restated AutoWeb, Inc. (formerly
Autobytel Inc.) 2014 Equity Incentive Plan and Employee Stock
Option Award Agreement under the Amended and Restated AutoWeb, Inc.
(formerly Autobytel Inc.) 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, each dated as
of January 21, 2016 between Company and Jeffrey H. Coats,
incorporated by reference to Exhibits
10.2 and 10.3,
respectively, to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC
January 27, 2016 (SEC File No. 001-34761).
|
|
|
10.36■
|
Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement
dated as of April 3, 2014 between Company and Jeffrey H. Coats,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit
99.1 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 8, 2014 (SEC File
No. 001-34761); as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated January 21,
2016, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC January 27, 2016 (SEC File
No. 001-34761); and as amended by Amendment No. 2 dated September
21, 2016, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.3 to the Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on September 26, 2016 (SEC File No.
001-34761).
|
|
|
10.37■*
|
Separation and Release Agreement dated as of April 30, 2018
between Company and Jeffrey Coats.
|
|
|
Consulting Services Agreement between Jeffrey
Coats and AutoWeb, Inc. dated April 13, 2018, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit
10.3 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 18, 2018 (SEC File
No. 001-34761).
|
|
|
|
Confidential Separation and Release Agreement
dated as of June 1, 2018 between Company and Kimberly Boren,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 on the Quarterly Period ended June 30, 2018
filed with the SEC on August 2, 2018 (SEC File No.
001-34761).
|
|
|
|
Consulting Services Agreement dated as of June
9, 2018 between Company and Kimberly Boren, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit
10.6 on the Quarterly Period
ended June 30, 2018 filed with the SEC on August 2, 2018 (SEC File
No. 001-34761).
|
|
|
|
10.41
|
Fourth Amended and Restated Stockholder
Agreement dated as of March 1, 2017, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit
10.1 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 2, 2017 (SEC File
No. 001-34761).
|
|
|
10.42
|
Loan Agreement dated as of February 26, 2013 by
and between Company and Union Bank, N.A., a national banking
association (“Loan
Agreement”); as amended
by First Amendment dated as of September 10, 2013 to Loan
Agreement; as amended by Second Amendment dated as of January 13,
2014 to Loan Agreement, Security Agreement dated January 13, 2014,
Commercial Promissory Note dated January 13, 2014 ($9,000,000 Term
Loan), and Commercial Promissory Note dated January 13, 2014
($8,000,000 Revolving Loan), incorporated by reference
to Exhibit
10.4 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 14, 2014 (SEC File
No. 001-34761); as amended by Third Amendment dated as of May 20,
2015 to Loan Agreement, Commercial Promissory Note dated May 20,
2015 ($15,000,000 Term Loan), and Commercial Promissory Note dated
May 20, 2015 ($8,000,000 Revolving Loan), incorporated by reference
to Exhibits
10.1, 10.2 and 10.3 to
the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 27, 2015
(SEC File No. 001-34761); as amended by Fourth Amendment dated as
of June 1, 2016 to Loan Agreement, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit
10.5 to
the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period ended June 30, 2016 filed with
the SEC on August 4, 2016 (SEC File No.
001-34761); as amended by
Fifth Amendment dated as of June 28, 2017 to Loan Agreement and
Commercial Promissory Note dated on June 28, 2017 ($8,000,000
Revolving Loan), incorporated by reference to Exhibits
10.2 and 10.3 to
the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 29, 2017
(SEC File No. 001-34761); and as amended by Sixth Amendment dated
as of December 27, 2017 to Loan Agreement, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit
10.1 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 27, 2017 (SEC
File No. 001-34761).
|
|
|
10.43
|
Lease Agreement dated April 3, 1997 between The
Provider Fund Partners, The Colton Company (n/k/a: GFE MacArthur
Investments, LLC, as successor-in-interest to The Provider Fund
Partners, The Colton Company) and the Company
(“Irvine
Lease”), as amended by
Amendment No. 12 dated February 6, 2009 to Irvine Lease, Amendment
No. 13 dated February 6, 2009 to Irvine Lease, and Amendment No. 14
to Irvine Lease dated November 9, 2010, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit
10.79 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2011 filed with
the SEC on March 1, 2012 (SEC File No. 001-34761); as amended by
Amendment No. 15 dated October 31, 2012 to Irvine Lease,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.69 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended December 31, 2012 filed with
the SEC on February 28, 2013 (SEC File No. 001-34761); as amended
by Amendment No. 16 to Irvine Lease dated August 7, 2015,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.32 to the Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 10, 2016 (SEC File
No. 001-34761); and as amended by Amendment No. 17 dated April 14,
2017 to the Irvine Lease dated April 3, 1997 between GFE MacArthur
Investments, LLC, successor-in-interest to TFP Partners, and the
Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.3 to the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 4, 2017
(SEC File No. 001-34761).
|
|
|
Lease Agreement dated December 9, 2015 between
Rivergate Tower Owner, LLC and the Company, as amended by Amendment
No. 1 dated November 21, 2016, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.35 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the
SEC on March 9, 2017 (SEC File No. 001-34761).
|
|
|
|
Contract for Lease and Deposit dated June 1, 2016
between AW GUA, Limitada, and Mertech, Sociedad Anonima, for office
No. 1101, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC
on March 9, 2017 (SEC File No. 001-34761).
|
|
|
|
Contract for Lease and Deposit dated June 1, 2016
between AW GUA, Limitada, and Mertech, Sociedad Anonima, for office
No. 1102, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC
on March 9, 2017 (SEC File No. 001-34761).
|
|
|
|
10.47‡
|
Master License and Services Agreement as of
October 5, 2017 by and between AutoWeb and DealerX Partners, LLC,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 11, 2017 (SEC File
No. 001-34761).
|
|
|
10.48‡
|
Stockholder Agreement dated as of October 5,
2017 by and between AutoWeb, DealerX Partners, LLC and Jeffrey
Tognetti, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 11, 2017 (SEC File
No. 001-34761).
|
|
|
10.49
|
Tax Benefit Preservation Plan Exemption
Agreement and Irrevocable Proxy dated November 15, 2017 by and
between AutoWeb, Piton Capital Partners LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company (“Piton
Capital”), and Piton
Capital’s managing members, incorporated by reference
to Exhibits
10.1 and 10.2,
respectively, to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC
on November 17, 2017 (SEC File No. 001-34761).
|
|
|
10.50
|
Tax Benefit Preservation Plan Exemption
Agreement and Irrevocable Proxies, effective as of November 30,
2018, by and between AutoWeb, Inc. and Daniel M. Negari, The 1 8
999 Trust, a trust organized under the laws of Nevada, Michael R.
Ambrose, and The Insight Trust, a trust organized under the laws of
Nevada, incorporated by reference to Exhibits
10.1,
10.2,
10.3,
10.4 and
10.5, respectively, to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed
with the SEC on November 30, 2018 (SEC File No.
001-34761).
|
|
|
10.51‡
|
Transitional License and Linking Agreement, made
as of January 1, 2017, by and among Internet Brands, Inc., a
Delaware corporation, Car.com, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and
the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to
the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January
6, 2017 (SEC File No. 001-34761).
|
|
|
10.52
|
Convertible Subordinated Promissory Note dated
as of January 13, 2014 (Principal Amount $1,000,000.00) issued by
Company to AutoNationDirect.com, Inc., a Delaware corporation,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 14, 2014 (SEC File
No. 001-34761).
|
|
|
10.53
|
Warrant to Purchase 69,930 Shares of Company
Common Stock dated as of January 13, 2014 issued by Company to
AutoNationDirect.com, Inc., a Delaware corporation, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit
10.2 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 14, 2014 (SEC File
No. 001-34761).
|
|
|
10.54
|
Form of Warrant to Purchase Common Stock (on an
as-converted basis following the conversion of Series B Junior
Preferred Stock) dated as of October 1, 2015 issued by the Company
to the persons listed on Schedule A thereto, which is incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 6, 2015 (SEC File
No. 001-34761).
|
|
|
21.1*
|
Subsidiaries of
AutoWeb, Inc.
|
|
|
23.1*
|
Consent of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Moss Adams
LLP.
|
|
|
24.1*
|
Power
of Attorney (included in the signature page hereto).
|
|
|
31.1*
|
Chief
Executive Officer Section 302 Certification of Periodic Report
dated March 7, 2019.
|
|
|
31.2*
|
Chief
Financial Officer Section 302 Certification of Periodic Report
dated March 7, 2019.
|
|
|
32.1*
|
Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Section 906
Certification of Periodic Report dated March 7, 2019.
|
|
|
101.INS††
|
XBRL
Instance Document
|
|
|
101.SCH††
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
|
|
101.CAL††
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
|
101.DEF††
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Extension Definition Document
|
|
|
101.LAB††
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document
|
|
|
101.PRE††
|
XBRL
Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document
|
|
|
*
|
Filed
herewith.
|
|
|
■
|
Management
Contract or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement.
|
|
|
‡
|
Certain schedules
in this Exhibit have been omitted in accordance with Item 601(b)(2)
of Regulation S-K. AutoWeb, Inc. will furnish supplementally a
copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit to the Securities and
Exchange Commission upon request; provided, however, that AutoWeb,
Inc. may request confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for any schedule
or exhibit so furnished.
|
|
|
††
|
Furnished with
this report. In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation
S-T, the information in these exhibits shall not be deemed to be
“filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability
under that section, and shall not be incorporated by reference into
any registration statement or other document filed under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as expressly set forth
by specific reference in such filing.
|
Item 16.
Form 10-K Summary
None
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, on the 7th day of March, 2019.
|
AUTOWEB, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ JARED R. ROWE
|
|
|
|
Jared R. Rowe
|
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each of
AutoWeb, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Company”),
and the undersigned Directors and Officers of AutoWeb, Inc. hereby
constitute and appoint Jared R. Rowe, Joseph P. Hannan or Glenn E.
Fuller as the Company’s or such Director’s or
Officer’s true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, for
the Company or such Director or Officer and in the Company’s
or such Director’s or Officer’s name, place and stead,
in any and all capacities, with full power to act alone, to sign
any and all amendments to this report, and to file each such
amendment to this report, with all exhibits thereto, and any and
all documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, hereby granting unto said attorneys-in-fact
and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and
perform any and all acts and things requisite and necessary to be
done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes
as the Company or such Director or Officer might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them may lawfully do or
cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of
the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
Signature
|
Title
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MICHAEL
J. FUCHS
Michael J. Fuchs
|
Chairman
of the Board and Director
|
March 7, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JARED
R. ROWE
Jared R. Rowe
|
President,
Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
March 7, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JOSEPH
P. HANNAN
Joseph P. Hannan
|
Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial Officer)
|
March 7, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ WESLEY
OZIMA
Wesley Ozima
|
Senior
Vice President and Controller
(Principal
Accounting Officer)
|
March 7, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MICHAEL
A. CARPENTER
Michael A. Carpenter
|
Director
|
March 7,2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MATIAS
DE TEZANOS
Matias de Tezanos
|
Director
|
March 7, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ CHAN
GALBATO
Chan Galbato
|
Director
|
March 7, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ MARK
N. KAPLAN
Mark N. Kaplan
|
Director
|
March 7, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JANET
M. THOMPSON
Janet M. Thompson
|
Director
|
March 7, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ JOSE
VARGAS
Jose Vargas
|
Director
|
March 7, 2019
|
|
AUTOWEB, INC.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Shareholders and the Board of Directors of
AutoWeb,
Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of AutoWeb,
Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018 and
2017, the related consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2018, and the related notes and schedule (collectively referred to
as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of
December 31, 2018 and 2017, and
the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2018, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, in
2018 the Company changed its method of accounting for revenue
recognition due to the adoption of Accounting Standards
Codification Topic No. 606.
Basis for Opinion
These
consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company’s consolidated
financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with
respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal
securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the
PCAOB.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated
financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due
to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we
engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial
reporting. As part of our audits we
are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over
financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such
opinion.
Our
audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of
material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due
to error or fraud, and performing procedures to respond to those
risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis,
evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated
financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the
consolidated
financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/
Moss Adams LLP
San
Diego, California
March
7, 2019
We have
served as the Company’s auditor since 2012.
AUTOWEB, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEETS
(in thousands, except per-share and share data)
|
December 31,
2018
|
December 31,
2017
|
Assets
|
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$13,600
|
$24,993
|
Short-term
investment
|
—
|
254
|
Accounts
receivable, net of allowances for bad debts and customer credits of
$566 and $892 at December 31, 2018 and 2017,
respectively
|
26,898
|
25,911
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
1,245
|
1,805
|
Total
current assets
|
41,743
|
52,963
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
3,181
|
4,311
|
Investments
|
—
|
100
|
Intangible
assets, net
|
11,976
|
29,113
|
Goodwill
|
—
|
5,133
|
Long-term
deferred tax asset
|
—
|
692
|
Other
assets
|
516
|
601
|
Total
assets
|
$57,416
|
$92,913
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
$10,908
|
$7,083
|
Accrued
employee-related benefits
|
3,125
|
2,411
|
Other
accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
8,868
|
7,252
|
Current
convertible note payable
|
1,000
|
—
|
Total
current liabilities
|
23,901
|
16,746
|
Convertible
note payable
|
—
|
1,000
|
Borrowings
under revolving credit facility
|
—
|
8,000
|
Total
liabilities
|
23,901
|
25,746
|
Commitments
and contingencies (Note 8)
|
|
|
Stockholders’
equity:
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, $0.001 par value; 11,445,187 shares authorized
|
|
|
Series
A Preferred stock, none issued and outstanding
|
—
|
—
|
Common
stock, $0.001 par value; 55,000,000 shares authorized; 12,960,450
and 13,059,341 shares issued and outstanding at December 31,
2018 and 2017, respectively
|
13
|
13
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
361,218
|
356,054
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(327,716)
|
(288,900)
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
33,515
|
67,167
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$57,416
|
$92,913
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
AUTOWEB, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(LOSS)
(in thousands, except per-share data)
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
||
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
Lead
fees
|
$96,936
|
$107,045
|
$130,684
|
Advertising
|
28,169
|
34,142
|
24,508
|
Other
revenues
|
484
|
938
|
1,492
|
Total
revenues
|
125,589
|
142,125
|
156,684
|
Cost
of revenues
|
101,315
|
99,352
|
98,771
|
Cost
of revenues – impairment
|
9,014
|
—
|
—
|
Gross
profit
|
15,260
|
42,773
|
57,913
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
Sales
and marketing
|
12,419
|
14,315
|
18,118
|
Technology
support
|
13,838
|
12,567
|
13,986
|
General
and administrative
|
16,077
|
12,001
|
14,613
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
4,897
|
4,781
|
5,068
|
Goodwill
impairment
|
5,133
|
37,688
|
—
|
Long-lived
asset impairment
|
1,968
|
—
|
—
|
Total
operating expenses
|
54,332
|
81,352
|
51,785
|
Operating
income (loss)
|
(39,072)
|
(38,579)
|
6,128
|
Interest
and other income (expense), net
|
250
|
(946)
|
558
|
Income
(loss) before income tax provision
|
(38,822)
|
(39,525)
|
6,686
|
Income
tax provision (benefit)
|
(6)
|
25,439
|
2,815
|
Net
income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss)
|
$(38,816)
|
$(64,964)
|
$3,871
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
earnings (loss) per common share
|
$(3.04)
|
$(5.48)
|
$0.36
|
Diluted
earnings (loss) per common share
|
$(3.04)
|
$(5.48)
|
$0.29
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
AUTOWEB, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(in thousands, except share data)
|
Common Stock
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
||
|
Number of Shares
|
Amount
|
Number of Shares
|
Amount
|
Additional Paid-In-
Capital
|
Accumulated Deficit
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2015
|
10,626,624
|
$11
|
168,007
|
$—
|
$342,485
|
$(234,295)
|
$108,201
|
Share-based
compensation
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
4,486
|
—
|
4,486
|
Issuance
of common stock upon exercise of stock options
|
386,001
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
3,051
|
—
|
3,051
|
Net
income
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
3,871
|
3,871
|
Balance
at December 31, 2016
|
11,012,625
|
11
|
168,007
|
—
|
350,022
|
(230,424)
|
119,609
|
Share-based
compensation
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
4,106
|
—
|
4,106
|
Issuance
of common stock upon exercise of stock options
|
248,344
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
1,355
|
—
|
1,355
|
Issuance
of restricted stock
|
345,000
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Conversion
of preferred shares
|
1,680,070
|
2
|
(168,007)
|
—
|
(2)
|
—
|
—
|
DealerX
contingent consideration
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
2,470
|
—
|
2,470
|
Repurchase
of common stock
|
(226,698)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(1,897)
|
—
|
(1,897)
|
Cumulative
effect adjustment
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
6,488
|
6,488
|
Net
loss
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(64,964)
|
(64,964)
|
Balance
at December 31, 2017
|
13,059,341
|
13
|
—
|
—
|
356,054
|
(288,900)
|
67,167
|
Share-based
compensation
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
4,866
|
—
|
4,866
|
Issuance
of common stock upon exercise of stock options
|
28,467
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
98
|
—
|
98
|
Cancellation
of restricted stock
|
(188,333)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Issuance
of common stock
|
60,975
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
200
|
—
|
200
|
Net
loss
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(38,816)
|
(38,816)
|
Balance
at December 31, 2018
|
12,960,450
|
$13
|
—
|
$—
|
$361,218
|
$(327,716)
|
$33,515
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
AUTOWEB, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
||
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss)
|
$(38,816)
|
$(64,964)
|
$3,871
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
8,544
|
7,653
|
7,303
|
Goodwill
impairment
|
5,133
|
37,688
|
—
|
Intangible
asset impairment
|
9,014
|
—
|
—
|
Provision
for bad debt
|
241
|
346
|
344
|
Provision
for customer credits
|
217
|
247
|
592
|
Share-based
compensation
|
4,866
|
4,103
|
4,412
|
Write-down
of assets
|
—
|
8
|
115
|
Long-lived
asset impairment
|
1,968
|
—
|
—
|
Gain
on sale of business
|
—
|
—
|
(2,183)
|
(Gain)/loss
on long-term strategic investment
|
(25)
|
580
|
777
|
Change
in deferred tax assets
|
692
|
25,264
|
1,994
|
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
(1,445)
|
7,130
|
(3,229)
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
814
|
(904)
|
(402)
|
Other
non-current assets
|
(278)
|
200
|
946
|
Accounts
payable
|
3,825
|
(2,681)
|
2,121
|
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
2,330
|
(3,182)
|
1,581
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
(2,920)
|
11,488
|
18,242
|
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
Purchases
of property and equipment
|
(896)
|
(1,799)
|
(2,148)
|
Purchase
of intangible assets
|
—
|
(8,600)
|
—
|
Proceeds
from sale of investment
|
125
|
—
|
—
|
Investment
in GoMoto
|
—
|
—
|
(375)
|
Change
in short-term investment
|
—
|
(3)
|
(251)
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(771)
|
(10,402)
|
(2,774)
|
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
Payments
on revolving credit facility
|
(8,000)
|
—
|
—
|
Repurchase
of common stock
|
—
|
(1,897)
|
—
|
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock
|
200
|
—
|
—
|
Payments
on term loan borrowings
|
—
|
(14,063)
|
(3,937)
|
Net
proceeds from stock option exercises
|
98
|
1,355
|
3,051
|
Payment
of contingent fee arrangement
|
—
|
—
|
(63)
|
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(7,702)
|
(14,605)
|
(949)
|
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(11,393)
|
(13,519)
|
14,519
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
24,993
|
38,512
|
23,993
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$13,600
|
$24,993
|
$38,512
|
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
$4
|
$650
|
$760
|
Cash
refunds for income taxes
|
$223
|
$—
|
$—
|
Cash
paid for interest
|
$118
|
$948
|
$717
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
schedule of non-cash investing and financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
DealerX
contingent consideration
|
$—
|
$2,470
|
$—
|
Sale
of specialty finance leads business
|
$—
|
$—
|
$3,168
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.
AUTOWEB, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.
Organization and Operations of AutoWeb
AutoWeb, Inc. (“AutoWeb” or the “Company”) is a digital marketing company for
the automotive industry that assists automotive retail dealers
(“Dealers”) and
automotive manufacturers (“Manufacturers”) market and sell
new and used vehicles to consumers by utilizing the Company’s
digital sales enhancing products and services.
The Company’s consumer-facing automotive
websites (“Company
Websites”) provide
consumers with information and tools to aid them with their
automotive purchase decisions and the ability to connect with
Dealers regarding purchasing or leasing vehicles
(“Leads”). The Company’s click traffic
referral program provides consumers who are shopping for vehicles
online with targeted offers based on make, model and geographic
location. As these consumers conduct online research on Company
Websites or on the site of one of our network of automotive
publishers, they are presented with relevant offers on a timely
basis and, upon the consumer clicking on the displayed
advertisement, are sent to the appropriate website location of one
of the Company’s Dealer, Manufacturer or advertising
customers.
The
Company was incorporated in Delaware on May 17, 1996. Its
principal corporate offices are located in Irvine, California. The
Company’s common stock is listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market
under the symbol AUTO. On October 9, 2017, the Company changed its
name from Autobytel Inc. to AutoWeb, Inc., assuming the name of
AutoWeb, Inc., which was acquired in October 2015. In connection
with this name change, the Company’s stock ticker symbol was
changed from “ABTL” to “AUTO” on The Nasdaq
Capital Market.
On October 5, 2017, the Company and DealerX
Partners, LLC, a Florida limited liability company
(“DealerX”), entered into a Master License and
Services Agreement (“DealerX License
Agreement”). Pursuant to
the terms of the DealerX License Agreement, AutoWeb was granted a
perpetual license to access and use DealerX’s proprietary
platform and technology for targeted, online marketing. DealerX was
to operate the platform for AutoWeb and provide enhancements to and
support for the DealerX platform for at least an initial five-year
period (“Platform Support
Obligations”), however
the Company terminated the Platform Support Obligations effective
November 2, 2018, and as a result, recorded an impairment charge.
See Note 6 for additional information.
On December 19, 2016, AutoWeb and Car.com, Inc., a
wholly owned subsidiary of AutoWeb (“Car.com”), entered into an Asset Purchase and Sale
Agreement, by and among AutoWeb, Car.com, and Internet Brands,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Internet
Brands”), in which
Internet Brands acquired substantially all of the assets of the
automotive specialty finance leads group of Car.com. The
transaction was completed effective as of December 31, 2016. The
transaction consideration consisted of $3.2 million in cash and
$1.6 million to be paid over a five-year period pursuant to a
Transitional License and Linking Agreement. The Company recorded a
gain on sale of approximately $2.2 million in connection with the
transaction in the fourth quarter of 2016.
On October 1, 2015 (“AWI Merger
Date”), AutoWeb entered
into and consummated an Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among
AutoWeb, New Horizon Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and
a wholly owned subsidiary of AutoWeb (“Merger Sub”), Autobytel, Inc. (formerly AutoWeb,
Inc.), a Delaware corporation (“AWI”), and Jose Vargas, in his capacity as
Stockholder Representative. On the AWI Merger Date,
Merger Sub merged with and into AWI, with AWI continuing as the
surviving corporation and as a wholly owned subsidiary of
AutoWeb. AWI was a privately-owned company providing an
automotive search engine that enables Manufacturers and Dealers to
optimize advertising campaigns and reach highly-targeted car buyers
through an auction-based click marketplace. Prior to the
acquisition, the Company previously owned approximately 15% of the
outstanding shares of AWI, on a fully converted and diluted basis,
and accounted for the investment on the cost
basis.
On May 21, 2015 (“Dealix/Autotegrity Acquisition
Date”), AutoWeb and CDK
Global, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(“CDK”), entered into and consummated a Stock
Purchase Agreement in which AutoWeb acquired all of the issued and
outstanding shares of common stock in Dealix Corporation, a
California corporation and subsidiary of CDK, and Autotegrity,
Inc., a Delaware corporation and subsidiary of CDK (collectively,
“Dealix/Autotegrity”). Dealix
Corporation provides new and used car Leads to automotive
dealerships, Dealer groups and Manufacturers, and Autotegrity, Inc.
is a consumer Leads acquisition and analytics
business.
2.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of
Presentation. The
accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts
of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany
transactions and balances have been eliminated in
consolidation. Certain prior year amounts have been
reclassified for consistency with the current period
presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on
the reported results of operations.
Use of Estimates in the
Preparation of Financial Statements. The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires the Company to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant
estimates include, but are not limited to, allowances for bad debts
and customer credits, useful lives of depreciable assets and
capitalized software costs, long-lived asset impairments, goodwill
and purchased intangible asset valuations, accrued liabilities,
contingent payment provisions, debt valuation and valuation
allowance for deferred tax assets, warrant valuation and
stock-based compensation expense. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
Cash and Cash
Equivalents. For
purposes of the Consolidated Balance Sheets and the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows, the Company considers all highly liquid
investments with an original maturity of 90 days or less at the
date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents
represent amounts held by the Company for use by the Company
and are recorded at cost, which approximates fair
value.
Accounts
Receivable. Credit
is extended to customers based on an evaluation of the
customer’s financial condition, and when credit is extended,
collateral is generally not required. Interest is not normally
charged on receivables.
Allowances for Bad Debts and
Customer Credits. The allowance for bad debts is an estimate of bad
debt expense that could result from the inability or refusal of
customers to pay for services. Additions to the estimated allowance
for bad debts are recorded to sales and marketing expenses and are
based on factors such as historical write-off percentages, the
current business environment and known concerns within the current
aging of accounts receivable. Reductions in the estimated allowance
for bad debts due to subsequent cash recoveries are recorded as a
decrease in sales and marketing expenses. As specific bad debts are
identified, they are written-off against the previously established
estimated allowance for bad debts with no impact on operating
expenses.
The
allowance for customer credits is an estimate of adjustments for
services that do not meet the customer requirements. Additions to
the estimated allowance for customer credits are recorded as a
reduction of revenues and are based on the Company’s
historical experience of: (i) the amount of credits issued;
(ii) the length of time after services are rendered that the
credits are issued; (iii) other factors known at the time; and
(iv) future expectations. Reductions in the estimated allowance for
customer credits are recorded as an increase in revenues. As
specific customer credits are identified, they are written-off
against the previously established estimated allowance for customer
credits with no impact on revenues.
If
there is a decline in the general economic environment that
negatively affects the financial condition of the Company’s
customers or an increase in the number of customers that are
dissatisfied with their services, additional estimated allowances
for bad debts and customer credits may be required, and the impact
on the Company’s business, results of operations, financial
condition, earnings per share, cash flow or the trading price of
our stock could be material.
Contingencies. From
time to time the Company may be subject to proceedings, lawsuits
and other claims. The Company assesses the likelihood of
any adverse judgments or outcomes of these matters as well as
potential ranges of probable losses. The Company records a loss
contingency when an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount
of the loss can be reasonably estimated. The amount of allowances
required, if any, for these contingencies is determined after
analysis of each individual case. The amount of allowances may
change in the future if there are new material developments in each
matter. Gain contingencies are not recorded until all
elements necessary to realize the revenue are present. Any legal
fees incurred in connection with a contingency are expensed as
incurred.
Fair Value of Financial
Instruments. The
Company records its financial assets and liabilities at fair value,
which is defined under the applicable accounting standards as the
exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to
transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most
advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants on the measure
date. The Company uses valuation techniques to measure
fair value, maximizing the use of observable outputs and minimizing
the use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes a
fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the
first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that
may be used to measure fair value which are the
following:
Level
1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities.
Level
2 – Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either
directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or
liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other
inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable
market data for substantially the full term of the assets or
liabilities.
Level
3 – Inputs include management’s best estimate of what
market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at
the measurement date. The inputs are unobservable in the
market and significant to the instrument’s
valuation.
Cash
equivalents, accounts receivable, net of allowance, accounts
payable and accrued liabilities, are carried at cost, which
management believes approximates fair value because of the
short-term maturity of these instruments.
The Company’s investments during the years
ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, consisted of investments in
SaleMove and GoMoto that were accounted for under the cost method.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded a
write-off related to it its investment in SaleMove of $0.6 million.
Subsequently during the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company
sold its interest back to
SaleMove for $0.1 million. See
Note 5 for further discussion.
Variable Interest
Entities. The
Company had an investment in an entity that is considered a
variable interest entity (“VIE”) under U.S. GAAP. The Company
had concluded that during the period it held its investment in
SaleMove, SaleMove qualified as a variable interest and SaleMove
was a VIE. VIEs are legal entities in which the equity investors do
not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to independently
finance its activities or the collective holders do not have the
power through voting or similar rights to direct the activities of
the entity that most significantly impacts its economic
performance, the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the
entity, or the right to receive expected residual returns of the
entity. Consolidation of a VIE is considered appropriate if a
reporting entity is the primary beneficiary, the party that has
both significant influence and control over the VIE. Management
periodically performs a qualitative analysis to determine if the
Company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. This analysis includes
review of the VIEs’ capital structure, contractual terms, and
primary activities, including the Company’s ability to direct
the activities of the VIEs and obligations to absorb losses, or the
right to receive benefits, significant to the
VIE.
Based
on AutoWeb’s analysis for the periods presented in this
report, it was not the primary beneficiary of SaleMove.
Accordingly, SaleMove did not meet the criteria for
consolidation.
Concentration of Credit Risk
and Risks Due to Significant
Customers. Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations
of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents,
investments and accounts receivable. Cash and cash equivalents are
primarily maintained with two financial institutions in the United
States. Deposits held by banks exceed the amount of insurance
provided for such deposits. Generally these deposits may be
redeemed upon demand. Accounts receivable are primarily derived
from fees billed to automotive Dealers and automotive
Manufacturers.
The
Company has a concentration of credit risk with its automotive
industry related accounts receivable balances, particularly with
Urban Science Applications (which represents several Manufacturer
programs), General Motors and Media.net
Advertising. During 2018, approximately 37% of our total
revenues were derived from these three customers, and approximately
41% or $11.2 million of gross accounts receivable related to these
three customers at December 31, 2018. Urban Science
Applications accounted for 18% and 21% of total revenues and
accounts receivable, respectively, as of December 31, 2018.
Media.net Advertising accounted for 10% and 6% of total revenues
and accounts receivable, respectively, as of December 31,
2018. General Motors accounted for 9% and 13% of total revenues and
accounts receivable, respectively, as of December 31,
2018.
During
2017, approximately 34% of the Company’s total revenues were
derived from these same three customers, and approximately 43% or
$11.6 million of gross accounts receivable related to these three
customers at December 31, 2017. Urban Science
Applications accounted for 15% and 20% of total revenues and total
accounts receivable as of December 31, 2017, respectively.
Media.net Advertising accounted for 11% of both total revenues and
accounts receivable as of December 31, 2017,
respectively.
During
2016, approximately 28% of the Company’s total revenues were
derived from Urban Science Applications, General Motors and Ford
Direct, and approximately 36% or $12.6 million of gross accounts
receivable related to these three customers at December 31,
2016. In 2016, Urban Science Applications accounted for
16% and 19% of total revenues and total accounts receivable as of
December 31, 2016, respectively.
Property and
Equipment. Property
and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets,
generally three years. Amortization of leasehold improvements is
provided using the straight-line method over the shorter of the
remaining lease term or the estimated useful lives of the
improvements. Repair and maintenance costs are charged to operating
expenses as incurred. Gains or losses resulting from the retirement
or sale of property and equipment are recorded as operating income
or expenses, respectively.
Operating
Leases. The Company
leases office space and certain office equipment under operating
lease agreements which expire on various dates through 2024, with
options to renew on expiration of the original lease
terms.
Reimbursed
tenant improvements are considered in determining straight-line
rent expense and are amortized over the shorter of their estimated
useful lives or the lease term. The lease term begins on the date
of initial possession of the leased property for purposes of
recognizing rent expense on a straight-line basis over the term of
the lease. Lease renewal periods are considered on a lease-by-lease
basis and are generally not included in the initial lease
term.
Capitalized Internal Use
Software and Website Development
Costs. The Company
capitalizes costs to develop internal use software in accordance
with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 350-40, “Internal-Use
Software”, and ASC 350-50, “Website Development
Costs”, which require the capitalization of external and
internal computer software costs and website development costs,
respectively, incurred during the application development stage.
The application development stage is characterized by software
design and configuration activities, coding, testing and
installation. Training and maintenance costs are expensed as
incurred while upgrades and enhancements are capitalized if it is
probable that such expenditures will result in additional
functionality. Capitalized internal use software development costs
are amortized using the straight-line method over an estimated
useful life of three to five years. Capitalized website development
costs, once placed in service, are amortized using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the related
websites. The Company capitalized $0.5 million, $0.5
million and $1.7 million of such costs for the years ended December
31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets and Intangible Assets. The Company periodically reviews long-lived
amortizing assets to determine if there is any impairment of these
assets. The Company assesses the impairment of these assets, or the
need to accelerate amortization, whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable. Judgments regarding the existence of impairment
indicators are based on legal factors, market conditions and
operational performance of the long-lived assets and other
intangibles. Future events could cause the Company to conclude that
impairment indicators exist and that the assets should be reviewed
to determine their fair value. The Company assesses the assets for
impairment based on the estimated future undiscounted cash flows
expected to result from the use of the assets and their eventual
disposition. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its
estimated future undiscounted cash flows, an impairment loss is
recorded for the excess of the asset’s carrying amount over
its fair value. Fair value is generally determined based on a
valuation process that provides an estimate of a fair value of
these assets using a discounted cash flow model, which includes
many assumptions and estimates. Once the valuation is determined,
the Company would write-down these assets to their determined fair
value, if necessary. Any write-down could have a material adverse
effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of
operations. The Company recorded impairment of $0.6 million related
to its investment in SaleMove in 2017. In 2018, we recorded
impairments totaling $11.0 million, primarily attributable to a
$9.0 million charge due to our decision to terminate the
support provisions of the DealerX License Agreement, which
significantly impacted the usability of the asset. The
remaining $2.0 million is
comprised of a $1.6 million customer relationships impairment
related to a 2015 acquisition after determining that a significant
percentage of acquired customers were no longer part of the dealer
base, and the write-off of $0.4 million in cash advances to
SaleMove.
Indefinite-lived intangible
assets. Indefinite-lived
intangible assets consists of a domain name, which was acquired as
part of the Dealix/Autotegrity acquisition in 2015, which is tested
for impairment annually, or more frequently if an event occurs or
circumstances changes that would indicate that impairment may
exist. When evaluating indefinite-lived intangible assets for
impairment, the Company may first perform a qualitative analysis to
determine whether it is more likely than not that the
indefinite-lived intangible assets is impaired. If the Company does
not perform the qualitative assessment, or if the Company
determines that it is more likely than not that the fair value of
the indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its carrying amount,
the Company will calculate the estimated fair value of the
indefinite-lived intangible asset. Fair value is the price a
willing buyer would pay for the indefinite-lived intangible asset
and is typically calculated using an income approach. If the
carrying amount of the indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds
the estimated fair value, an impairment charge is recorded to
reduce the carrying value to the estimated fair value. The Company
did not record any impairment of indefinite-lived intangible assets
in 2018 and 2017.
Goodwill. Goodwill
represents the excess of the purchase price for business
acquisitions over the fair value of identifiable assets and
liabilities acquired. The Company evaluates the carrying value of
enterprise goodwill for impairment by comparing the
enterprise’s carrying value to its fair value. If the fair
value is less than the carrying value, enterprise goodwill is
potentially impaired. The Company evaluates enterprise goodwill, at
a minimum, on an annual basis in the fourth quarter of each year or
whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that the
carrying amount of goodwill may be impaired. The Company recorded
goodwill impairment of $5.1 million and $37.7 million in 2018 and
2017, respectively.
Cost of Revenues.
Cost of revenues consists of Lead and
traffic acquisition costs and other cost of revenues. Lead and
traffic acquisition costs consist of payments made to the
Company’s Lead providers, including internet portals and
on-line automotive information providers. Other cost of revenues
consists of search engine marketing (“SEM”) and fees paid to third parties for data
and content, including search engine optimization
(“SEO”) activity, included on the Company’s
properties, connectivity costs and development costs related to the
Company Websites, compensation related expense and technology
license fees, server equipment depreciation and technology
amortization directly related to Company Websites. SEM,
sometimes referred to as paid search marketing, is the practice of
bidding on keywords on search engines to drive traffic to a
website.
Income
Taxes. The Company
accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future
tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the
financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply
to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences
are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax
assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in
income in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company
records a valuation allowance, if necessary, to reduce deferred tax
assets to an amount it believes is more likely than not to be
realized.
On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted
comprehensive tax legislation known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
(“TCJA”). The TCJA established new tax laws that
took effect in 2018, including, but not limited to (1) reduction of
the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from a maximum of 35% to 21%;
(2) elimination of the corporate alternative minimum tax
(“AMT”); (3) a new limitation on deductible
interest expense; (4) one-time transition tax on certain deemed
repatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries
(“Transition
Tax”); (5) limitations on
the deductibility of certain executive compensation; (6) changes to
the bonus depreciation rules for fixed asset additions: and (7)
limitations on net operating losses (“NOLs”) generated after December 31, 2017, to 80%
of taxable income.
ASC 740, “Income Taxes”, requires the
effects of changes in tax laws to be recognized in the period in
which the legislation is enacted. However, due to the complexity
and significance of the TCJA’s provisions, the SEC staff
issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 (“SAB 118”), which provides guidance on accounting
for the tax effects of the TCJA. SAB 118 provides a measurement
period that should not extend beyond one year from the TCJA
enactment date for companies to complete the accounting under ASC
740.
In
2017, we recorded provisional amounts for certain enactment-date
effects of the TCJA, for which the accounting had not been
finalized, by applying the guidance in SAB 118. The Company
recorded a decrease in deferred tax assets and deferred tax
liabilities of $11.7 million and $0.0 million, respectively, with a
corresponding net adjustment to deferred income tax expense of
$11.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2017. In addition,
the Company recognized a deemed repatriation of $0.6 million of
deferred foreign income from its Guatemala subsidiary, which did
not result in any incremental tax cost after application of foreign
tax credits. Accordingly, we completed our accounting for the
effects of the TCJA in 2018 and did not recognize any material
adjustments to the 2017 provisional income tax
expense.
The TCJA created a provision known as global
intangible low-tax income (“GILTI”) that imposes a U.S. tax on certain
earnings of foreign subsidiaries that are subject to foreign tax
below a certain threshold. We have made an accounting policy
election to reflect GILTI taxes, if any, as a current income tax
expense in the period incurred.
Computation of Basic and
Diluted Net Earnings (Loss) per
Share. Basic net
earnings (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding during the
period. Diluted net earnings (loss) per share is
computed using the weighted average number of common shares, and if
dilutive, potential common shares outstanding, as determined under
the treasury stock and if-converted method, during the period.
Potential common shares consist of unvested restricted stock, common shares issuable
upon the exercise of stock options, the exercise of
warrants, and conversion of
convertible notes.
The
following are the share amounts utilized to compute the basic and
diluted net earnings (loss) per share for the years ended
December 31:
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
Basic
Shares:
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average common shares outstanding
|
12,756,191
|
11,910,906
|
10,673,015
|
Weighted
average common shares repurchased
|
—
|
(58,367)
|
—
|
Basic
Shares
|
12,756,191
|
11,852,539
|
10,673,015
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
Shares:
|
|
|
|
Basic
Shares
|
12,756,191
|
11,852,539
|
10,673,015
|
Weighted
average dilutive securities
|
—
|
—
|
2,630,194
|
Dilutive
Shares
|
12,756,191
|
11,852,539
|
13,303,209
|
For
the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, basic and diluted
weighted average shares are the same as the Company generated a net
loss for the period and potentially dilutive securities are
excluded because they have an anti-dilutive impact. For the year
ended December 31, 2016, weighted average dilutive securities
included dilutive options, restricted stock awards, and shares of
common stock issued in June 2017 upon conversion of the Series B
Junior Participating Convertible Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value
per share, that was issued in connection with the acquisition of
AWI.
For
the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, weighted average
dilutive securities were not included since the Company had a net
loss for the year. For the year ended December 31, 2016, weighted
average dilutive securities included dilutive options, warrants and
convertible preferred shares.
Potentially
dilutive securities representing approximately 3.5 million, 3.7
million and 1.9 million shares of common stock for the years ended
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, were excluded
from the computation of diluted income per share for these periods
because their effect would have been anti-dilutive.
Share-Based
Compensation. The
Company grants restricted stock and stock option awards (the
“Awards”) under several of its share-based
compensation Plans (the “Plans”), that are more fully described in Note
10. The Company recognizes share-based compensation
based on the Awards’ fair value, net of estimated forfeitures
on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods, which
is generally over the awards’ respective vesting period, or
on an accelerated basis over the estimated performance periods for
options with performance conditions.
Restricted
stock fair value is measured on the grant date based on the quoted
market price of the Company’s common stock, and the stock
option fair value is estimated on the grant date using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model based on the underlying common
stock closing price as of the date of grant, the expected term,
stock price volatility and risk-free interest rates.
Business Segment.
The Company conducts its business
within the United States and within one business segment which is
defined as providing automotive and marketing
services. The Company’s operations are aggregated
into a single reportable operating segment based upon similar
economic and operating characteristics as well as similar
markets.
Advertising
Expense. Advertising
costs are expensed in the period incurred and the majority of
advertising expense is recorded in sales and marketing expense.
Advertising expense in the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and
2016 was $1.4 million, $1.7 million and $1.4 million,
respectively.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
Issued but not yet adopted by the Company
The Company considers the applicability and impact
of all Accounting Standards Updates (“ASU”) issued by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (“FASB”). ASUs not listed below were assessed and
determined to be either not applicable or are expected to have
minimal impact on the Company’s consolidated result of
operations, financial position and cash flows.
Accounting Standards
Codification 220 “Comprehensive Income.”
In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2018-02, “Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.” The new guidance
allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive
income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from
the TCJA and will improve the usefulness of information reported to
financial statement users. The ASU will take effect for all
entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal
years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company believes this
ASU will not have a material effect on the consolidated financial
statements and related disclosures.
Accounting Standards
Codification 842 “Leases.” In February 2016, ASU No. 2016-02,
“Leases (Topic 842)” was issued. This ASU
was issued to increase transparency and comparability among
organizations by requiring lessees to (i) recognize right-of-use
(“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities on the
balance sheet to represent the right to use the leased asset for
the lease term and the obligation to make lease payments and (ii)
disclose key information about leasing arrangements. Some changes
to the lessor accounting guidance were made to align both of the
following: (i) the lessor accounting guidance with certain changes
made to the lessee accounting guidance and (ii) key aspects of the
lessor accounting model with revenue recognition
guidance.
The Company will adopt the ASU effective January
1, 2019. We will utilize the modified retrospective approach for adoption for
all leases that exist at or commence after the date of initial
application with an option to use certain practical expedients. We
expect to use the package of practical expedients that allows us to
not reassess: (i) whether any expired or existing contracts are or
contain leases, (ii) lease classification for any expired or
existing leases, and (iii) initial direct costs for any expired or
existing leases. We additionally expect to use (i) hindsight when
evaluating contractual lease options, (ii) the practical expedient
that allows lessees to treat lease and non-lease components of
leases as a single lease component, and (iii) the portfolio
approach which allows similar leased assets to be grouped and
accounted for together. In
addition, we will implement additional internal controls to
evaluate future transactions in accordance with the
standard.
The adoption of Topic 842 will have a material
impact on our consolidated balance sheet due to the recognition of
ROU assets and lease liabilities. The adoption of this ASU is not
expected to have a material impact on our consolidated statement of
operations or our consolidated statement of cash flows.
We do not expect to recognize a
material cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance sheet
retained earnings on January 1, 2019. Because we’ve elected
to use the modified
retrospective approach, the ASU will not be applied to periods
prior to adoption and the adoption of this ASU will have no impact
on our previously reported results. The future minimum lease
payments for our operating leases as of December 31,
2018 are disclosed in Note 8 to the consolidated financial
statements. Upon adoption, we expect to recognize operating lease
ROU assets and lease liabilities that reflect the present value of
these future payments. As the rate implicit in the lease cannot be
determined for any of our leases, we will use an estimated
incremental borrowing rate of
5.5% to determine the present value of lease payments. Based on our
review of the impact of ASC 842 on our current lease population, we
expect to record approximately $4.4 million for lease liabilities
and approximately $4.2 million for ROU assets based upon the lease
liabilities adjusted for deferred rent.
SEC Release No. 33-10532,
Disclosure Update and Simplification. In August 2018, the SEC adopted the final rule
under SEC Release No. 33-10532, “Disclosure Update and
Simplification”, amending certain disclosure requirements
that were redundant, duplicative, overlapping, outdated or
superseded. In addition, the amendments expanded the disclosure
requirements on the analysis of stockholders’ equity for
interim financial statements. Under the amendments, an analysis of
changes in each caption of stockholders’ equity presented in
the balance sheet must be provided in a note or separate statement.
The analysis should present a reconciliation of the beginning
balance to the ending balance of each period for which a statement
of comprehensive income is required to be filed. This final rule
became effective on November 5, 2018. The Company will adopt
the requirements of the new standard for the interim reporting of
the first quarter of 2019.
Recently adopted by the Company
Accounting Standards
Codification 606 “Revenue from Contracts with
Customers.” In May 2014,
ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(Topic 606)” was issued. The new standard sets forth a single
comprehensive model for recognizing and reporting revenue and
requires the use of a five-step methodology to depict the transfer
of promised goods and services to customers in an amount that
reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be
entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Additionally, ASU
No. 2014-09 requires enhanced disclosure regarding revenue
recognition. On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASC 606
using the modified retrospective transition method, which had no
material impact on operations, and required no cumulative
adjustment to be made to beginning retained earnings on
January 1, 2018. Therefore, results for reporting periods
beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under ASC 606, while
prior period amounts have not been adjusted. See Note 3 for
further discussion.
Accounting Standards
Codification 805 “Business Combinations.”
In January 2017, ASU No. 2017-01,
“Clarifying the Definition of a Business” was issued.
ASU No. 2017-01 provides a more robust framework to use in
determining when a set of assets and activities is a business. The
Company adopted ASU No. 2017-01 on January 1, 2018, and it did
not have a material effect on the consolidated financial
statements.
Accounting Standards
Codification 718 “Compensation – Stock
Compensation.” In May
2017, ASU No. 2017-09, “Scope of Modification
Accounting” was issued. The amendments in this update provide
guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a
share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification
accounting in Topic 718. An entity should apply ASU No. 2017-09 on
a prospective basis for an award modified on or after the adoption
date for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual
periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Additionally, in June
2018, FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, “Compensation—Stock
Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based
Payment Accounting.” The update largely aligns the accounting
for share-based payment awards issued to employees and
nonemployees, particularly with regards to the measurement date and
the impact of performance conditions. Under the new guidance, the
existing employee guidance will apply to nonemployee share-based
transactions (as long as the transaction is not effectively a form
of financing). The cost of nonemployee awards will continue to be
recorded as if the grantor had paid cash for the goods or services.
In addition, the contractual term will be able to be used in lieu
of an expected term in the option-pricing model for nonemployee
awards. The Company adopted ASU No. 2017-09 and ASU No. 2018-07 in
the current year and, therefore, results for reporting periods
beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under ASU No.
2017-09 and ASU No. 2018-07, while prior period amounts have not
been adjusted. See Note 10 for further
discussion.
3.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue
is recognized when the Company transfers control of promised goods
or services to the Company’s customers, or when the Company
satisfies any performance obligations under contract. The amount of
revenue recognized reflects the consideration the Company expects
to be entitled to in exchange for respective goods or services
provided. Further, under ASC 606, contract assets or contract
liabilities that arise from past performance but require further
performance before obligation can be fully satisfied must be
identified and recorded on the balance sheet until respective
settlements have been met.
The
Company performs the following steps in order to properly determine
revenue recognition and identify relevant contract assets and
contract liabilities:
●
identify
the contract with a customer;
●
identify
the performance obligations in the contract;
●
determine
the transaction price;
●
allocate
the transaction price to the performance obligations in the
contract; and
●
recognize
revenue when, or as, the Company satisfies a performance
obligation.
The
Company earns revenue by providing leads, advertising, and mobile
products and services used by Dealers and Manufacturers in their
efforts to market and sell new and used vehicles to consumers. The
Company enters into contracts that can include various combinations
of products and services, which are generally capable of being
distinct and accounted for as separate performance obligations. The
Company records revenue on distinct performance obligations at a
single point in time, when control is transferred to the
customer.
The
Company has three main revenue sources – Lead fees,
advertising, and other revenue. Accordingly, the Company recognizes
revenue for each source as described below:
●
Lead
fees – paid by Dealers and Manufacturers participating in the
Company’s Lead programs and are comprised of Lead transaction
and/or monthly subscription fees. Lead fees are recognized in the
period when service is provided.
●
Advertising
– fees paid by Dealers and Manufacturers for (i) display
advertising on the Company’s websites and (ii) fees from
the Company’s click traffic program. Revenue is recognized in
the period advertisements are displayed on the Company’s
websites or the period in which clicks have been delivered, as
applicable. The Company recognizes gross revenue from the delivery
of action-based advertisements in the period in which a user takes
the action for which the marketer contracted for with the Company.
For advertising revenue arrangements where the Company is not the
principal, the Company recognizes revenue on a net
basis.
●
Other
revenues – consists primarily of revenues from the
Company’s mobile products and revenues from the
Company’s Reseller Agreement with SaleMove, Inc. Revenue is
recognized in the period in which products or services are
sold.
Variable Consideration
The
Company’s products, namely Leads, are generally sold with a
right-of-return for services that do not meet customer requirements
as specified by the relevant contract. Rights-of-return are
estimable, and provisions for estimated returns are recorded as a
reduction in revenue by the Company in the period revenue is
recognized, and thereby accounted for as variable consideration.
The Company includes the allowance for customer credits in its net
accounts receivable balances on the Company’s balance sheet
at period end. Allowance for customer credits totaled $121,000 and
$213,000 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017,
respectively.
See
further discussion below on significant judgments exercised by the
Company in regards to variable consideration.
Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities Unbilled
Revenue
Timing
of revenue recognition may differ from the timing of invoicing to
customers. The Company records a receivable when revenue is
recognized prior to invoicing. From time to time, the Company may
have balances on its balance sheet representing revenue that has
been recognized by the Company upon satisfaction of performance
obligations and earning a right to receive payment. These not-yet
invoiced receivable balances are driven by the timing of
administrative transaction processing, and are not indicative of
partially complete performance obligations, or unbilled revenue.
Unbilled revenue represents revenue that is partially earned,
whereby control of promised services has not yet transferred to the
customer, and for which the Company has not earned the complete
right to payment. The Company had zero unbilled revenue included in
its consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2018 and
2017.
Deferred Revenue
The
Company defers the recognition of revenue when cash payments are
received or due in advance of satisfying its performance
obligations, including amounts which are refundable. Such activity
is not a common practice of operation for the Company. The Company
had zero deferred revenue included in its consolidated balance
sheets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017. Payment terms and
conditions can vary by contract type. Generally, payment terms
within the Company’s customer contracts include a requirement
of payment within 30 to 60 days from date of invoice. Typically,
customers make payments after receipt of invoice for billed
services, and less typically, in advance of rendered
services.
Practical Expedients and Exemptions
The
Company excludes from the transaction price all sales taxes related
to revenue producing transactions collected from the customer for a
governmental authority. The Company applies the new revenue
standard requirements to a portfolio of contracts (or performance
obligations) with similar characteristics for transactions where it
is expected that the effects of applying the revenue recognition
guidance to the portfolio would not differ materially on the
financial statements from that of applying the same guidance to the
individual contracts (or performance obligations) within that
portfolio. The Company generally expenses incremental costs of
obtaining a contract when incurred because the amortization period
would be less than one year. These costs primarily relate to sales
commissions and are recorded in selling, marketing, and
distribution expense.
Significant Judgments
The
Company provides Dealers and Manufacturers with various
opportunities to market their vehicles to potential vehicle buyers,
namely via consumer lead and click traffic referrals and online
advertising products and services. Proper revenue recognition of
digital marketing activities, as well as proper recognition of
assets and liabilities related to these activities, requires
management to exercise significant judgment with the following
items:
●
Arrangements with Multiple Performance Obligations
The
Company enters into contracts with customers that often include
multiple products and services to a customer. Determining whether
products and/or services are distinct performance obligations that
should be accounted for singularly or separately may require
significant judgment.
●
Variable Consideration and Customer Credits
The
Company’s products are generally sold with a right-of-return.
Additionally, the Company will sometimes provide customer credits
or sales incentives. These items are accounted for as variable
consideration when determining the allocation of the transaction
price to performance obligations under a contract. The allowance
for customer credits is an estimate of adjustments for services
that do not meet customer requirements. Additions to the estimated
allowance for customer credits are recorded as a reduction of
revenues and are based on the Company’s historical experience
of: (i) the amount of credits issued; (ii) the length of
time after services are rendered that the credits are issued;
(iii) other factors known at the time; and (iv) future
expectations. Reductions in the estimated allowance for customer
credits are recorded as an increase in revenues.
As
specific customer credits are identified, they are charged against
this allowance with no impact on revenues. Returns and credits are
measured at contract inception, with respective obligations
reviewed each reporting period or as further information becomes
available, whichever is earlier, and only to the extent that it is
probable that a significant reversal of any incremental revenue
will not occur. The allowance for customer credits is included in
the net accounts receivable balances of the Company’s balance
sheets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.
The
Company has not made any significant changes to judgments in
applying ASC 606 during the year ended December 31,
2018.
Disaggregation of Revenue
The
Company disaggregates revenue from contracts with customers by
revenue source and has determined that disaggregating revenue into
these categories sufficiently depicts the differences in the
nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of its revenue streams. The
Company has three main sources of revenue: lead fees, advertising,
and other revenues.
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
||
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
(in thousands)
|
||
Lead
fees
|
$96,936
|
$107,045
|
$130,684
|
Advertising
|
|
|
|
Clicks
|
23,387
|
28,262
|
11,906
|
Display
and other advertising
|
4,782
|
5,880
|
12,602
|
Other
|
484
|
938
|
1,492
|
Total
revenues
|
$125,589
|
$142,125
|
$156,684
|
4.
Disposals
Disposal of Specialty Finance Leads Product
On December 19, 2016, AutoWeb and Car.com, Inc., a
wholly owned subsidiary of AutoWeb (“Car.com”), entered into an Asset Purchase and Sale
Agreement, by and among AutoWeb, Car.com, and Internet Brands,
Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Internet
Brands”), pursuant to
which Internet Brands acquired substantially all of the assets of
the automotive specialty finance leads group of Car.com
(“Acquired
Group”). The transaction
was completed effective as of December 31, 2016. The transaction
consideration consisted of $3.2 million in cash paid at closing and
$1.6 million to be paid over a five-year period pursuant to a
Transitional License and Linking Agreement
(“Specialty Finance
Leads License
Agreement”). The Company
recorded a gain on sale of approximately $2.2 million in connection
with the transaction in December 2016.
In
connection with the transaction, Internet Brands, Car.com and
AutoWeb entered into the Specialty Finance Leads License Agreement
pursuant to which Car.com and AutoWeb provides Internet Brands
certain transition services and arrangements. Pursuant to the
Specialty Finance Leads License Agreement, (i) Internet Brands will
pay AutoWeb $1.6 million in fees over the five-year term of the
Specialty Finance Leads License Agreement, and (ii) Car.com (1)
granted Internet Brands a limited, non-exclusive, non-transferable
license to use the Car.com logo and name solely for sales and
marketing purposes in Internet Brand’s automotive specialty
finance leads business; and (2) provided certain redirect linking
of consumer traffic from the Acquired Group’s current
specialty finance leads application forms to a landing page
designated by Internet Brands. The Company received $0.4 million
and $0.4 million during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017,
respectively, related to the Specialty Finance Leads License
Agreement.
The
disposal of the automotive specialty finance leads product did not
qualify for presentation and disclosure as a discontinued operation
because it did not represent a strategic shift that had or will
have a major effect on the Company’s operations.
5.
Investments
Investments. The
Company’s investments in SaleMove and GoMoto were recorded at
cost.
The
following table presents the Company’s investment activity
for 2018 and 2017 (in thousands):
Description
|
SaleMove
|
GoMoto
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2016
|
$580
|
$100
|
$680
|
Write-off
|
(580)
|
—
|
(580)
|
Balance
at December 31, 2017
|
—
|
100
|
$100
|
Write-off
|
—
|
(100)
|
(100)
|
Balance
at December 31, 2018
|
$—
|
$—
|
$—
|
SaleMove
In September 2013, the Company entered into a Convertible Note
Purchase Agreement with SaleMove in which AutoWeb invested $150,000
in SaleMove in the form of an interest bearing, convertible
promissory note. In November 2014, the Company invested an
additional $400,000 in SaleMove in the form of an interest bearing,
convertible promissory note. Upon closing of a preferred
stock financing by SaleMove in July 2015, these two notes were
converted in accordance with their terms into an aggregate of
190,997 Series A Preferred Stock, which shares are classified as a
long-term investment on the consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2016. The Company recorded an impairment charge of
$0.6 million in SaleMove in 2017. On June 5, 2018, the Company sold
its shares of Series A Preferred stock back to SaleMove for
$125,000. The gain of $125,000 is recorded in Interest and other
income (expense) on the Consolidated Condensed Statement of
Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for year ended December
31, 2018.
In
October 2013, the Company entered into a Reseller Agreement with
SaleMove to become a reseller of SaleMove’s technology for
enhancing communications with
consumers. SaleMove’s technology allows Dealers
and Manufacturers to enhance the online shopping experience by
interacting with consumers in real-time, including live video,
audio and text-based chat or by phone. The Company and SaleMove
equally share in revenues from automotive-related sales of the
SaleMove products and services. In connection with this reseller
arrangement, the Company advanced $1.0 million to SaleMove to fund
SaleMove’s 50% share of various product development,
marketing and sales costs and expenses. These previously advanced
funds are repaid to the Company from SaleMove’s share of net
revenues and expenses from the Reseller Agreement each reporting
period. During the three months ended September 30, 2018, the
Company performed a qualitative review of the agreement with
SaleMove and, based on several factors related to the trend in
operating results from this reseller arrangement and costs being
incurred by the Company, the parties agreed to allow the
arrangement to expire November 30, 2018, one month earlier than the
original expiration date of December 31, 2018. Upon expiration of
the Reseller Agreement, the remaining outstanding advances are no
longer recoverable from SaleMove, and, accordingly, the Company has
impaired the remaining balance of $364,000 of advances due from
SaleMove. The impairment charge is included in “Long-lived
asset impairment” in the Consolidated Condensed Statement of
Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the year ended
December 31, 2018.
GoMoto
In December 2014, the Company entered
into a Series Seed Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement with GoMoto
in which the Company paid $100,000 for 317,460 shares of Series
Seed Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value per share. The
$100,000 investment in GoMoto was recorded at cost because the
Company does not have significant influence over
GoMoto. In October 2015 and May 2016, the Company
invested an additional $375,000 and $375,000 in each period in the
form of convertible promissory notes (“GoMoto Notes”). The GoMoto Notes accrue interest at an
annual rate of 4.0% and are due and payable in full upon demand by
the Company or at GoMoto’s option ten days’ written
notice unless converted prior to the repayment of the GoMoto Notes.
The GoMoto Notes will be converted into preferred stock of GoMoto
in the event of a preferred stock financing by GoMoto of at least
$1.0 million prior to repayment of the GoMoto Notes. At December
31, 2018 and 2017, both the GoMoto Notes and related interest
receivable are fully reserved on the Consolidated Condensed Balance
Sheets because the Company believed the amounts were not
recoverable. Further, the three months ended September 30, 2018,
represented the third consecutive quarter of declining operating
results for GoMoto and, as such, the Company performed a
qualitative review of its investment in GoMoto. Based on continuing
deterioration in GoMoto’s financial position, the Company
believed that uncertainty existed in the recoverability of its
remaining investment of $100,000 in GoMoto and, accordingly,
recognized a loss on the investment which has been recorded in
“Interest and other income (expense)” on the
Consolidated Condensed Statement of Operations and Comprehensive
(Loss) Income for the year ended December 31,
2018.
On
January 29, 2019, the GoMoto Notes were converted into 1,781,047
shares of GoMoto’s Series A-2 Preferred Stock, $0.001 par
value per share. The outstanding principal plus accrued interest
under the GoMoto Notes was converted in accordance with the terms
of the notes upon the closing of a new preferred stock financing
and based on a discount to the price paid by the new investor for
the investor’s preferred shares.
6.
Selected Balance Sheet Accounts
Property and Equipment
Property
and equipment consist of the following:
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Computer
software and hardware
|
$11,393
|
$11,065
|
Capitalized
internal use software
|
6,228
|
5,774
|
Furniture
and equipment
|
1,743
|
1,703
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
1,613
|
1,539
|
|
20,977
|
20,081
|
Less—Accumulated
depreciation and amortization
|
(17,796)
|
(15,770)
|
Property
and Equipment, net
|
$3,181
|
$4,311
|
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, capitalized internal use
software, net of amortization, was $1.2 million and $2.0 million,
respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense
related to property and equipment was $2.0 million for the year
ended December 31, 2018. Of this amount, $1.2
million was recorded in cost of revenues and $0.8 million was
recorded in operating expenses for the year ended December 31,
2018. Depreciation and amortization expense related to property and
equipment was $1.9 million for the year ended December 31,
2017. Of this amount, $1.1 million was recorded in cost
of revenues and $0.8 million was recorded in operating expenses for
the year ended December 31, 2017. Depreciation and amortization
expense related to property and equipment was $1.6 million for the
year ended December 31, 2016. Of this amount, $0.7 million was
recorded in cost of revenues and $0.8 million was recorded in
operating expenses for the year ended December 31,
2016.
Intangible Assets.
The
Company amortizes specifically identified definite-lived intangible
assets using the straight-line method over the estimated useful
lives of the assets.
On
October 5, 2017, the Company and DealerX entered into the DealerX
License Agreement. Pursuant to the terms of the DealerX License
Agreement, AutoWeb was granted a perpetual license to access and
use DealerX’s proprietary platform and technology for
targeted, online marketing.
The transaction consideration consisted of: (i)
$8.0 million in cash paid to DealerX upon execution of the DealerX
License Agreement and (ii) the right to 710,856 shares of the
Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share,
representing approximately five percent of the Company’s
outstanding Common Stock as of the date the parties entered into
the DealerX License Agreement (“Market Capitalization
Shares”) if on or before
October 5, 2022: (i) AutoWeb’s market capitalization averages
at least $225.0 million over a consecutive 90 day period or (ii)
there is a change in control of AutoWeb that reflects a market
capitalization of at least $225.0 million. If the Market
Capitalization Shares are issued to DealerX, DealerX’s
obligation to continue to support the platform
(“Platform Support
Obligations”) will
continue in perpetuity. Alternatively, upon the occurrence of
certain events prior to the issuance of the Market Capitalization
Shares, AutoWeb may elect to make an additional lump-sum payment of
$12.5 million (“Alternative Cash
Payment”) in order to
extend DealerX’s Platform Support Obligations in perpetuity.
If the Alternative Cash payment were made, DealerX’s
contingent right to receive the Market Capitalization Shares would
be terminated. The fair value of the Market Capitalization Shares
was calculated at $2.5 million. At the transaction date, the
Company recorded approximately $10.5 million as a definite-lived
intangible asset which was amortized over its expected useful life
of seven years.
Impairment of Intangible Asset
The
Company makes judgments about the recoverability of purchased
intangible assets with definite lives whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that an impairment may exist. Recoverability
of purchased intangible assets with definite lives is measured by
comparing the carrying amount of the asset to the future
undiscounted cashflows the asset is expected to generate. In the
third quarter of 2018, the Company performed an analysis of its
planned future use of two intangible assets in the licenses and
customer relationships asset groups. As a result of realignment
activities finalized in the third quarter, the Company made a
determination that the Company’s use of certain assets would
not be continued as originally planned. Accordingly, the Company
performed further analysis to quantitatively determine the amount
of impairment for each of these intangible assets as of
September 30, 2018.
An
assessment was performed on the DealerX License intangible asset,
whereby lead generation and acquisition cost, amongst other things,
was compared to alternate sources of lead generation available to
the Company. As a result of the Company’s analysis, the
Company concluded that the effectiveness of the platform was not
in-line with the enhanced consumer-to-client matchmaking that the
Company is seeking and made the decision in the third quarter to
terminate DealerX’s Platform Support Obligations,
significantly impacting the usability of the asset by the Company.
Accordingly, the Company recorded impairment charges of $9.0
million in connection with the impairment of this long-lived asset
with the expense recorded in Cost of revenues-impairment on the
Company’s Consolidated Condensed Statements of Operations and
Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the year ended December 31,
2018.
A
quantitative analysis was performed by the Company on its customer
relationship intangible assets, whereby it examined available data,
namely historical activity and cashflows resulting from the
customer relationships of previous acquisitions, in concert with
projected future use of acquired customer relationships within the
parameters of the Company’s future strategic plans. As a
result of this analysis, the Company determined there to be
impairment of $1.6 million related to customer relationship
intangible assets acquired in a 2015 acquisition for which
projected cashflows did not support the carrying values.
Additionally, the Company determined that the estimated useful life
of these customer relationship intangible assets had changed from
10 years to 5 years. This change in estimate has no impact on the
current period, but will impact amortization expense in future
periods as amortization will be accelerated over the remaining
estimated useful life of this asset due to the change in
estimate.
The
Company’s intangible assets will be amortized over the
following estimated useful lives (in thousands):
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
December 31, 2017
|
||||
Intangible Asset
|
Estimated Useful Life
|
Gross
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
Net
|
Gross
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
Net
|
Trademarks/trade
names/licenses/ domains
|
3
– 7 years
|
$16,589
|
$(14,914)
|
$1,675
|
$16,589
|
$(4,037)
|
$12,552
|
Software
and publications
|
3
years
|
1,300
|
(1,300)
|
—
|
1,300
|
(1,300)
|
—
|
Customer
relationships
|
2 -
5 years
|
19,563
|
(15,544)
|
4,019
|
19,563
|
(10,555)
|
9,008
|
Employment/non-compete
agreements
|
1-5
years
|
1,510
|
(1,510)
|
—
|
1,510
|
(1,493)
|
17
|
Developed
technology
|
5-7
years
|
8,955
|
(4,873)
|
4,082
|
8,955
|
(3,619)
|
5,336
|
|
$47,917
|
$(38,141)
|
$9,776
|
$47,917
|
$(21,004)
|
$26,913
|
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
December 31, 2017
|
||||
Indefinite-lived
Intangible Asset
|
Estimated Useful Life
|
Gross
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
Net
|
Gross
|
Accumulated Amortization
|
Net
|
Domain
|
Indefinite
|
$2,200
|
$—
|
$2,200
|
$2,200
|
$—
|
$2,200
|
Amortization
expense is included in “Cost of revenues” and
“Depreciation and amortization” in the Statements of
Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss). Amortization
expense was $8.1 million, $5.7 million and $5.7 million in 2018,
2017 and 2016, respectively. Amortization expense for 2018 includes
$1.6 million related to the above-mentioned customer relationship
impairment. The $9.0 million impairment related to DealerX was
recorded to Cost of revenues - impairment. Amortization expense for
intangible assets for the next five years is as
follows:
Year
|
Amortization Expense
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
2019
|
$4,872
|
2020
|
2,371
|
2021
|
1,499
|
2022
|
902
|
2023
|
86
|
Thereafter
|
46
|
|
$9,776
|
Goodwill.
Goodwill
represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of
net assets acquired. Goodwill is not amortized and is
assessed annually for impairment or whenever events or
circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may
not be recoverable. The Company impaired goodwill by
$5.1 million and $37.7 million, respectively, during the years
ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
As
of December 31, 2018 and 2017, accrued expenses and other
current liabilities consisted of the following:
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Accrued
employee related benefits
|
$3,125
|
$2,411
|
Other
accrued expenses and other current liabilities:
|
|
|
Accrued
traffic acquisition costs
|
6,971
|
5,952
|
Other
accrued expenses
|
1,040
|
355
|
Amounts
due to customers
|
423
|
438
|
Other
current liabilities
|
434
|
507
|
Total
other accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
8,868
|
7,252
|
|
|
|
Total
accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
$11,993
|
$9,663
|
Convertible Notes
Payable.
In connection with the acquisition of AutoUSA, LLC
(“AutoUSA”) on January 13, 2014, the Company issued a
convertible subordinated promissory note for $1.0 million
(“AutoUSA Note”)
to AutoNationDirect.com, Inc. The fair value of the AutoUSA
Note as of the AutoUSA Acquisition Date was $1.3 million.
This valuation was estimated using a binomial option pricing
method. Key assumptions used by the Company’s
outside valuation consultants in valuing the AutoUSA Note
included a market yield of 1.6% and stock price volatility of
65.0%. As the AutoUSA Note was issued with a substantial
premium, the Company recorded the premium as additional paid-in
capital. Interest is payable at an annual interest rate of 6%
in quarterly installments. The entire outstanding balance of
the AutoUSA Note plus accrued interest was paid in full on January
31, 2019.
7.
Credit Facility
The Company and MUFG Union Bank, N.A.
(“Union Bank”), entered into a Loan Agreement dated
February 26, 2013, as amended on September 10, 2013, January 13,
2014, May 20, 2015, June 1, 2016, June 28, 2017 and December 27,
2017 (the original Loan Agreement, as amended to date, is referred
to collectively as the “Credit Facility
Agreement.” The Credit
Facility Agreement provided for (i) a $9.0 million term loan
(“Term
Loan 1”); (ii) a $15.0
million term loan (“Term Loan 2”); and (iii) an $8.0 million working
capital revolving line of credit (“Revolving
Loan”). The term loans
were fully paid as of December 31, 2017. The Revolving Loan was
fully paid as of March 31, 2018, at which time the Credit Facility
Agreement was terminated.
Borrowings under the Revolving Loan bear interest
at either (i) the London Interbank Offering Rate
(“LIBOR”) plus 2.50% or (ii) the bank’s
Reference Rate (prime rate) minus 0.50%, at the option of the
Company. Interest under the Revolving Loan adjusts (i) at the end
of each LIBOR rate period (1, 2, 3, 6 or 12 months terms) selected
by the Company, if the LIBOR rate is selected; or (ii) with changes
in Union Bank’s Reference Rate, if the Reference Rate is
selected. The Company paid a commitment fee of 0.10% per year on
the unused portion of the Revolving Loan, payable quarterly in
arrears.
Term
Loan 1 was amortized over a period of four years, with fixed
quarterly principal payments of $562,500. Borrowings under Term
Loan 1 bore interest at either (i) the bank’s Reference Rate
(prime rate) minus 0.50% or (ii) LIBOR plus 2.50%, at the option of
the Company. Interest under Term Loan 1 adjusted (i) at the end of
each LIBOR rate period (1, 2, 3, 6 or 12 months terms) selected by
the Company, if the LIBOR rate was selected; or (ii) with changes
in Union Bank’s Reference Rate, if the Reference Rate was
selected.
Term
Loan 2 was amortized over a period of five years, with fixed
quarterly principal payments of $750,000. Borrowings under Term
Loan 2 bore interest at either (i) LIBOR plus 3.00% or (ii) the
bank’s Reference Rate (prime rate), at the option of the
Company. Interest under Term Loan 2 adjusted (i) at the end of each
LIBOR rate period (1, 2, 3, 6 or 12 months terms) selected by the
Company, if the LIBOR rate was selected; or (ii) with changes in
Union Bank’s Reference Rate, if the Reference Rate was
selected. The Company paid an upfront fee of 0.10% of the Term Loan
2 principal amount upon drawing upon Term Loan 2.
8.
Commitments and Contingencies
Operating Leases
The
Company leases its facilities and certain office equipment under
operating leases which expire on various dates through
2024. The Company’s future minimum lease payments
on leases with non-cancelable terms in excess of one year were as
follows (in thousands):
Years Ending December 31,
|
|
2019
|
$1,497
|
2020
|
1,068
|
2021
|
513
|
2022
|
459
|
2023
|
472
|
Thereafter
|
199
|
|
$4,208
|
Rent expense included in operating expenses was
$1.7 million, $2.0 million and $2.0 million for the years ended
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
In June 2017, the Company subleased
one of its buildings to a third party for the remainder of the
lease term which expires in February 2019. Rent expense for the
years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 is net of sublease
income of $0.2 million, $0.1 million and none,
respectively.
Employment Agreements
The
Company has employment agreements and retention agreements with
certain key employees. A number of these agreements require
severance payments, continuation of certain insurance benefits and
acceleration of vesting of stock options in the event of a
termination of employment without cause or for good
reason.
Litigation
From
time to time, the Company may be involved in litigation matters
arising from the normal course of its business
activities. Such litigation, even if not meritorious,
could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and
management attention, and an adverse outcome in litigation could
materially adversely affect its business, results of operations,
financial condition and cash flows.
9.
Retirement Savings Plan
The Company has a retirement savings plan which
qualifies as a deferred salary arrangement under
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended (“IRC”) (the “401(k) Plan”). The 401(k) Plan covers all
employees of the Company who are over 21 years of age and is
effective on the first day of the month following date of hire.
Under the 401(k) Plan, participating employees are allowed to defer
up to 100% of their pretax salaries not to exceed the maximum IRC
deferral amount. The Company contributions to the 401(k) Plan are
discretionary. The Company contribution in the years ended December
31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $0.3 million, $0.3 million and $0.4
million, respectively.
10.
Stockholders’ Equity
Stock-Based Incentive Plans
The Company has established several plans that
provide for stock-based awards (“Awards”) primarily in the form of stock options
and restricted stock awards (“RSAs”). Certain of these plans provide for
awards to Company employees, directors and independent consultants.
The Awards were granted under the 1999 Employee and Acquisition
Related Stock Option Plan, the 2000 Stock Option Plan, the Amended
and Restated 2001 Restricted Stock and Option Plan, the 2004
Restricted Stock and Option Plan, the 2006 Inducement Stock Option
Plan, 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, the Amended and Restated 2014
Equity Incentive Plan and the 2018 Equity Incentive
Plan. As of June 21, 2018, awards may only be granted
under the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan. An aggregate of
2.7 million shares of Company common stock are reserved for
future issuance under the 2018 Equity Incentive Plan at December
31, 2018.
Share-based
compensation expense is included in costs and expenses in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(Loss) as follows:
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
||
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
(in thousands)
|
||
Share-based
compensation expense:
|
|
|
|
Cost
of revenues
|
$23
|
$78
|
$67
|
Sales
and marketing
|
982
|
1,703
|
1,777
|
Technology
support
|
1,247
|
586
|
601
|
General
and administrative
|
2,615
|
1,739
|
1,982
|
Share-based
compensation expense
|
4,867
|
4,106
|
4,427
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
capitalized to internal use software
|
1
|
3
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
Total
share-based compensation expense
|
$4,866
|
$4,103
|
$4,412
|
During the year
ended December 31, 2018, certain awards were modified or
accelerated in connection with the termination of employment of
certain former officers of the Company. In accordance with guidance
provided under ASC 718 and related ASU No. 2017-09 and ASU No.
2018-07, the Company recognized award modification and acceleration
expenses related to these events in the period incurred.
Modification expense was determined by using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model to estimate the fair value of the modified
awards as of the new measurement date and respective fair value
assumptions. As reflected in the table above, the Company
recognized award modification and acceleration expense of $2.1
million in the year ended December 31, 2018. There were no
modification or acceleration expenses recognized in
2017.
As
of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, there was approximately
$2.6 million, $3.9 million and $4.9 million, respectively, of
unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock
options. This expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted
average period of approximately 2.1 years.
Stock Options
The
fair value of stock options is estimated on the grant date using
the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on the underlying
common stock closing price as of the date of grant, the expected
term, stock price volatility and risk-free interest rates. The
expected risk-free interest rate is based on United States Treasury
yield for a term consistent with the expected life of the stock
option in effect at the time of grant. Expected volatility is based
on the Company’s historical experience for a period equal to
the expected life. The Company has used historical volatility
because it has limited or no options traded on its common stock to
support the use of an implied volatility or a combination of both
historical and implied volatility. The Company estimates the
expected life of options granted based on historical experience,
which it believes is representative of future
behavior. The dividend yield is not considered in the
option-pricing formula since the Company has not paid dividends in
the past and has no current plans to do so in the future. The
Company elected to estimate a forfeiture rate and is based on
historical experience and is adjusted based on actual
experience.
The
Company grants its options at exercise prices that are not less
than the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on
the date of grant. Stock options generally have a seven or ten-year
maximum contractual term and generally vest one-third on the first
anniversary of the grant date and ratably over twenty-four months,
thereafter. The vesting of certain stock options is contingent upon
the employees continued employment with the Company during the
vesting period and vesting may be accelerated under certain
conditions, including upon a change in control of the Company,
termination without cause of an employee and voluntary termination
by an employee with good reason.
Awards
granted under the Company’s stock option plans were estimated
to have a weighted average grant date fair value per share of
$1.75, $6.23 and $7.04 for the years ended December 31, 2018,
2017 and 2016, respectively, based on the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model on the date of grant using the following
weighted average assumptions:
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
||
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
Expected
volatility
|
68%
|
62%
|
58%
|
Expected
risk-free interest rate
|
2.6%
|
1.8%
|
1.2%
|
Expected
life (years)
|
4.5
|
4.4
|
4.4
|
A
summary of the Company’s outstanding stock options as of
December 31, 2018, and changes during the year then ended is
presented below:
|
Number of
Options
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
per Share
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
|
(years)
|
(thousands)
|
Outstanding
at December 31, 2017
|
2,745,284
|
$11.50
|
3.9
|
$4,089
|
Granted
|
2,056,700
|
3.16
|
|
|
Exercised
|
(28,467)
|
3.39
|
|
70
|
Forfeited
or expired
|
(1,427,451)
|
9.96
|
|
|
Outstanding
at December 31, 2018
|
3,346,066
|
$7.10
|
4.3
|
$450
|
Vested
and expected to vest at December 31, 2018
|
3,169,280
|
$7.31
|
4.2
|
$420
|
Exercisable
at December 31, 2018
|
1,762,987
|
$10.15
|
2.6
|
$255
|
Service-Based
Options. During the
years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, the Company granted
2,056,700, 466,600 and 833,900 service-based stock options, which
had weighted average grant date fair values of $1.75, $6.23 and
$7.71, respectively.
Stock option
exercises. During 2018, 28,467
options were exercised, with an aggregate weighted average exercise
price of $3.39. During 2017, 248,344 options were exercised, with
an aggregate weighted average exercise price of $5.46. During 2016,
386,001 options were exercised, with an aggregate weighted average
exercise price of $7.91. The total intrinsic value of
options exercised during 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $0.1 million, $1.6
million and $3.2 million, respectively.
In
April 2018, the Company entered into an Inducement Stock Option
Award Agreement with the Company’s chief executive officer,
Jared Rowe (“Rowe Option
Award Agreement”). Pursuant to the Rowe Option Award
Agreement, Mr. Rowe was granted stock options to purchase 1,000,000
shares of common stock (“Rowe
Employment Options”), which will vest monthly in 36
monthly installments on the first day of each calendar month
following the date of grant. These options have an exercise price
of $3.26 per share and a term of seven years from the date of
grant. Upon a change in control of the Company or in the event of a
termination of Mr. Rowe’s employment by the Company without
cause or by Mr. Rowe with good reason, all unvested options will
vest. In the event of a termination of Mr. Rowe’s employment
with the Company by reason of Mr. Rowe’s death or disability,
the lesser of: (i) one-third of the total number of these options
and (ii) the total number of unvested options will vest upon the
date of termination.
Market Condition
Options. On January 21, 2016,
the Company granted 100,000 stock options to its former chief
executive officer (“Former
CEO”) with an exercise
price of $17.09 and grant date fair value of $1.47 per option,
using a Monte Carlo simulation model (“Former CEO Market Condition
Options”).
The Former CEO Market Condition Options were previously valued at
$2.94 per option but were revalued when the requisite stockholder
approval for the Company’s Amended and Restated 2014 Equity
Incentive Plan was obtained in June 2016. The Former CEO Market
Condition Options were subject to both stock price-based and
service-based vesting requirements that must be satisfied for the
Former CEO Market Condition Options to vest and become
exercisable. On
April 12, 2018, pursuant to the stock option award agreement,
vesting of the Former CEO Market Condition Options was accelerated
with the termination of employment of the Former CEO, resulting in
the recognition of approximately $0.8 million of non-recurring
share-based compensation expense during the first quarter of 2018.
The Former CEO Market Condition Options may be exercised at any
time on or before April 13, 2020.
Restricted Stock Awards. The Company
granted an aggregate of 125,000 RSAs on April 23, 2015 in
connection with the promotion of one of its executive officers. Of
these 125,000 RSAs, 25,000 were service-based and 100,000 were
performance-based. The forfeiture restrictions of the service-based
RSAs lapse with respect to one-third of the restricted stock on
each of the first, second, and third anniversaries of the date of
the award. Forfeiture restrictions lapsed on 8,333 shares and 8,333
shares of restricted stock on April 23, 2016 and April 23, 2017,
respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2018, 8,333
of the foregoing service-based RSAs and 100,000 of the
performance-based RSAs were forfeited upon the resignation of this
executive officer.
The
Company granted an aggregate of 345,000 RSAs on September 27, 2017
to senior officers of the Company. These RSAs are service-based and
the forfeiture restrictions lapse with respect to one-third of the
restricted stock on each of the first, second, and third
anniversaries of the date of the award. During the year ended
December 31, 2018, 80,000 shares of RSAs were forfeited upon the
resignation of two executive officers, the forfeiture restrictions
on 175,000 shares of RSA lapsed upon the termination of employment
of the Former CEO and three officers of the Company, and the
forfeiture restrictions of 40,000 shares of RSAs were modified upon
the entry into a consulting agreement with a former executive
officer. Accordingly, the Company recognized expense of $0.8
million related to the acceleration of vesting and modification of
these RSAs during the year ended December 31, 2018. As of December
31, 2018, 60,000 shares of RSAs remain unvested.
Tax Benefit Preservation Plan
The Company’s Tax Benefit Preservation Plan
dated as of May 26, 2010 between AutoWeb and Computershare Trust
Company, N.A., as rights agent, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to
Tax Benefit Preservation Plan dated as of April 14, 2014
(collectively, the “Tax Benefit Preservation
Plan”) was adopted by the
Company’s Board of Directors to protect stockholder value by
preserving the Company’s net operating loss carryovers and
other tax attributes that the Tax Benefit Preservation Plan is
intended to preserve (“Tax Benefits”). Under the Tax Benefit
Preservation Plan, rights to purchase capital stock of the Company
(“Rights”) have been distributed as a dividend at
the rate of five Rights for each share of common
stock. Each Right entitles its holder, upon triggering
of the Rights, to purchase one one-hundredth of a share of Series A
Junior Participating Preferred Stock of the Company at a price of
$73.00 (as such price may be adjusted under the Tax Benefit
Preservation Plan) or, in certain circumstances, to instead acquire
shares of common stock. The Rights will convert into a right to
acquire common stock or other capital stock of the Company in
certain circumstances and subject to certain
exceptions. The Rights will be triggered upon the
acquisition of 4.9% or more of the Company’s outstanding
common stock or future acquisitions by any existing holder of 4.9%
or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock. If a
person or group acquires 4.9% or more of the Company’s common
stock, all rights holders, except the acquirer, will be entitled to
acquire, at the then exercise price of a Right, that number of
shares of the Company common stock which, at the time, has a market
value of two times the exercise price of the Right. The Rights will
expire upon the earliest of: (i) the close of business on May
26, 2020 unless that date is advanced or extended, (ii) the
time at which the Rights are redeemed or exchanged under the Tax
Benefit Preservation Plan, (iii) the repeal of
Section 382 or any successor statute if the Board determines
that the Tax Benefit Preservation Plan is no longer necessary for
the preservation of the Company’s Tax Benefits, (iv) the
beginning of a taxable year of the Company to which the Board
determines that no Tax Benefits may be carried forward, or (v) such
time as the Board determines that a limitation on the use of the
Tax Benefits under Section 382 would no longer be material to the
Company. The Tax Benefit Preservation Plan was reapproved by the
Company’s stockholders at the Company’s 2017 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders.
Warrant
The warrant to purchase up to 148,240 shares of
Series B Preferred Stock issued in connection with the acquisition
of AWI (“AWI Warrant”) was valued at $1.72 per share for a total
value of $2.5 million. The Company used an option
pricing model to determine the value of the AWI
Warrant. Key assumptions used in valuing the AWI Warrant
are as follows: risk-free rate of 1.9%, stock price volatility of
74.0% and a term of 7.0 years. The AWI Warrant was
valued based on long-term stock price volatilities of the
Company’s common stock. On June 22, 2017, the
Company received stockholder approval which resulted in the
automatic conversion of the AWI Warrant into warrants to acquire up
to 1,482,400 shares of the Company’s common stock at an
exercise price of $18.45 per share of common stock. The AWI Warrant
became exercisable on October 1, 2018, subject to the following
vesting conditions: (i) with respect to the first one-third of the
warrant shares, if at any time after the issuance date of the AWI
Warrant and prior to the expiration date of the AWI Warrant the
Weighted Average Closing Price of the Company’s common stock
is at or above $30.00; (ii) with respect to the second one-third of
the warrant shares, if at any time after the issuance date of the
AWI Warrant and prior to the expiration date the Weighted Average
Closing Price is at or above $37.50; and (iii) with respect to the
last one-third of the warrant shares, if at any time after the
issuance date of the AWI Warrant and prior to the expiration date
the Weighted Average Closing Price is at or above
$45.00. The AWI Warrant expires on October 1,
2022.
Stock
Repurchase
On June 7, 2012, September 17, 2014 and September
6, 2017, the Company announced that its board of directors had
authorized the Company to repurchase up to $2.0 million, $1.0
million and $3.0 million of the Company’s common stock,
respectively. Under these repurchase programs, the Company
may repurchase common stock from time to time on the open market or
in private transactions. These authorizations do not require the
Company to purchase a specific number of shares, and the board of
directors may suspend, modify or terminate the programs at any
time. The Company will fund future repurchases through the use of
available cash. During 2017, the Company repurchased 226,698
shares for an aggregate price of $1.9 million. The average price
paid for all shares repurchased during 2017 was $8.37. The shares
repurchased during 2017 were cancelled and returned to authorized
and unissued shares. No shares were repurchased in
2018.
Shares Reserved for Future Issuance
The
Company had the following shares of common stock reserved for
future issuance upon the exercise or issuance of equity instruments
as of December 31, 2018:
|
Number of Shares
|
Stock
options outstanding
|
3,346,066
|
Authorized
for future grants under stock-based incentive plans
|
2,666,500
|
Reserved
for exercise of warrants
|
1,552,330
|
Total
|
7,564,896
|
11.
Income Taxes
The
components of income (loss) before income tax provision are as
follows for the years ended December 31:
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
(in thousands)
|
||
|
|
|
|
United
States
|
$(39,334)
|
$(40,090)
|
$6,448
|
International
|
512
|
565
|
238
|
Total
income (loss) before income tax provision
|
$(38,822)
|
$(39,525)
|
$6,686
|
Income
tax expense (benefit) from continuing operations consists of the
following for the years ended December 31:
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
(in thousands)
|
||
Current:
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
$32
|
$—
|
$244
|
State
|
(6)
|
36
|
508
|
Foreign
|
—
|
139
|
69
|
|
26
|
175
|
821
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
(6,213)
|
(2,916)
|
1,726
|
State
|
(1,188)
|
(175)
|
1,040
|
Foreign
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
(7,401)
|
(3,091)
|
2,766
|
|
|
|
|
Change
in federal tax rate
|
—
|
11,693
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation
allowance
|
7,369
|
16,662
|
(772)
|
|
|
|
|
Total
income tax expense (benefit)
|
$(6)
|
$25,439
|
$2,815
|
The
reconciliations of the U.S. federal statutory rate to the effective
income tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017
and 2016 are as follows:
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
Tax
provision at U.S. federal statutory rates
|
21.0%
|
34.0%
|
34.0%
|
State
income taxes net of federal benefit
|
3.2
|
2.7
|
3.1
|
Deferred
tax asset adjustments – NOL related
|
(0.2)
|
(12.1)
|
16.1
|
Non-deductible
permanent items
|
(0.2)
|
(0.1)
|
—
|
Stock
options
|
(3.4)
|
(0.1)
|
—
|
Goodwill
impairment
|
(1.5)
|
(17.5)
|
—
|
Other
|
(0.2)
|
0.3
|
0.4
|
Transition
tax adjustment
|
—
|
0.2
|
—
|
Change
in rate
|
—
|
(29.6)
|
—
|
Change
in valuation allowance
|
(18.7)
|
(42.2)
|
(11.5)
|
Effective
income tax rate
|
0.0%
|
(64.4)%
|
42.1%
|
Deferred
income taxes reflect the net tax effect of temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for
financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax
purposes. Significant components of the Company’s deferred
taxes as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 are as
follows:
|
2018
|
2017
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Deferred
tax assets:
|
|
|
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
|
143
|
$225
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
781
|
574
|
Net
operating loss carry-forwards
|
20,686
|
17,286
|
Intangible
assets
|
4,473
|
161
|
Share-based
compensation expense
|
2,250
|
2,727
|
Other
|
363
|
1,062
|
Total
gross deferred tax assets
|
28,696
|
22,035
|
Valuation
allowance
|
(28,687)
|
(21,318)
|
Total
deferred tax assets
|
9
|
717
|
|
|
|
Deferred
tax liabilities:
|
|
|
Fixed
assets
|
(9)
|
(25)
|
Total
gross deferred tax liabilities
|
(9)
|
(25)
|
Net
deferred tax assets
|
$—
|
$692
|
On
December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax
legislation known as the TCJA. The TCJA established new tax laws
that will take effect in 2018, including, but not limited to (i)
reduction of the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from a maximum of
35% to 21%; (ii) elimination of the corporate AMT; (iii) a new
limitation on deductible interest expense; (iv) the Transition Tax;
(v) limitations on the deductibility of certain executive
compensation; (vi) changes to the bonus depreciation rules for
fixed asset additions: and (vii) limitations on NOLs generated
after December 31, 2017, to 80% of taxable income.
ASC 740, “Income Taxes”, requires the
effects of changes in tax laws to be recognized in the period in
which the legislation is enacted. However, due to the complexity
and significance of the TCJA’s provisions, the SEC staff
issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 (“SAB 118”), which provides guidance on accounting
for the tax effects of the TCJA. SAB 118 provides a measurement
period that should not extend beyond one year from the TCJA
enactment date for companies to complete the accounting under ASC
740.
In
2017, we recorded provisional amounts for certain enactment date
effects of the TCJA, for which the accounting had not been
finalized, by applying the guidance in SAB 118. At December 31,
2017, the Company recorded a decrease in deferred tax assets and
deferred tax liabilities of $11.7 million and $0.0 million,
respectively, with a corresponding net adjustment to deferred
income tax expense of $11.7 million for the year ended December 31,
2017. In addition, the Company recognized a deemed repatriation of
$0.6 million of deferred foreign income from its Guatemala
subsidiary, which did not result in any incremental tax cost after
application of foreign tax credits. Accordingly, we completed our
accounting for the effects of the TCJA in 2018 and did not
recognize any material adjustments to the 2017 provisional income
tax expense.
The
TCJA created a provision known as GILTI that imposes a U.S. tax on
certain earnings of foreign subsidiaries that are subject to
foreign tax below a certain threshold. We have made an accounting
policy election to reflect GILTI taxes, if any, as a current income
tax expense in the period incurred.
The
Company adopted the provisions of ASU 2016-09 as of January 1,
2017, which requires recognition through opening retained earnings
of any pre-adoption date NOL carryforwards from nonqualified stock
options and other employee share-based payments (e.g., restricted
shares and share appreciation rights), as well as recognition of
all income tax effects from share-based payments arising on or
after January 1, 2017 in income tax expense. As a result, the
Company has recognized $18.4 million of pre-adoption date NOL
carryforwards with remaining carryforward periods of at least seven
years. The Company recognized excess tax benefits of $6.5 million
as an increase to deferred tax assets and a cumulative-effect
adjustment to retained earnings of $6.5 million. Based on the
weight of available evidence, the Company believes that it is more
likely than not that these NOLs will not be realized and has placed
a valuation allowance against the deferred tax asset.
During
2017, management assessed the available positive and negative
evidence to estimate if sufficient future taxable income will be
generated to utilize the existing deferred tax assets. A
significant piece of objective negative evidence evaluated was the
cumulative losses incurred over the three-year period ended
December 31, 2017. The Company was projecting pre-tax income for
2017 until the three months ended December 31, 2017, in which the
Company incurred a significant pre-tax loss due to goodwill
impairment. The Company experienced increased costs in servicing
its customers, as well as a decrease in market share resulting from
increased competition. Additionally, the Company also projected
that 2018 pre-tax profits, if any, may not offset the cumulative
three-year pre-tax loss as of December 31, 2017. Based on this
evaluation, the Company recorded an additional valuation allowance
of $16.7 million against its deferred tax assets during the year
ended December 31, 2017. At December 31, 2017, the Company has
recorded a valuation allowance of $21.3 million against its
deferred tax assets.
During
2018, the Company continued to experience losses and is not
projecting taxable income in the near future. Based on this
evaluation, the Company recorded an additional valuation allowance
of $7.4 million against its deferred tax assets during the year. At
December 31, 2018, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance
of $28.7 million against its deferred tax assets. Based on the
weight of available evidence, the Company believes that it is more
likely than not that these deferred tax assets will not be
realized.
At
December 31, 2018, the Company had federal and state NOLs of
approximately $87.6 million and $35.9 million,
respectively. $13.6 million of the federal NOLs have an
indefinite life and do not expire. The remaining $74.0 million of
the federal and the all of the state NOLs expire through 2038 as
follows (in millions):
The
federal NOLs expire through 2035 as follows (in
millions):
2025
|
$4.2
|
2026
|
25.4
|
2027
|
15.5
|
2028
|
5.2
|
2029
|
7.7
|
2030
|
10.6
|
2032
|
1.3
|
2033
|
0.1
|
2034
|
2.5
|
2035
|
1.5
|
Do
not expire
|
13.6
|
|
$87.6
|
The
state NOLs expire through 2038 as follows (in
millions):
2028
|
$2.7
|
2029
|
5.8
|
2030
|
11.0
|
2034
|
1.4
|
2035
|
0.8
|
2038
|
2.4
|
California
NOLs
|
24.1
|
Other
State NOLs
|
11.8
|
Total
State NOLs
|
$35.9
|
Utilization
of the NOLs and tax credit carry-forwards may be subject to a
substantial annual limitation due to ownership change limitations
that may have occurred or that could occur in the future, as
required by Section 382 of the IRC, as well as similar state
provisions. These ownership changes may limit the amount of NOLs
and research and development credit carry-forwards that can be
utilized annually to offset future taxable income and tax,
respectively. A Section 382 ownership change occurred in
2006 and any changes have been reflected in the NOLs presented
above as of December 31, 2018. As a result of an
acquisition in 2001, approximately $9.9 million of the NOLs are
subject to an annual limitation of approximately $0.5 million per
year.
The
federal and state NOLs begin to expire in 2025 and 2028,
respectively. Approximately $10.8 million and $5.0 million,
respectively, of the federal and state NOLs were incurred by
subsidiaries prior to the date of the Company’s acquisition
of such subsidiaries. The Company established a valuation allowance
of $4.1 million at the date of acquisitions related to these
subsidiaries. The tax benefits associated with the realization of
such NOLs was credited to the provision for income
taxes.
At
December 31, 2018, the Company has federal and state research and
development tax credit carry-forwards of $0.3 million and $0.2
million, respectively. The federal credits begin to
expire in 2021. The state credits do not
expire.
As
of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company had unrecognized tax
benefits of approximately $0.5 million and $0.5 million,
respectively, all of which, if subsequently recognized, would have
affected the Company’s tax rate. A reconciliation
of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is
as follows:
|
2018
|
2017
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Balance
at January 1,
|
$464
|
$464
|
Reductions
based on tax positions related to prior years and
settlements
|
—
|
—
|
Balance
at December 31,
|
$464
|
$464
|
The
Company is subject to taxation in the United States and various
foreign and state jurisdictions. In general, the Company is no
longer subject to U.S. federal and state income tax examinations
for years prior to 2014 (except for the use of tax losses generated
prior to 2014 that may be used to offset taxable income in
subsequent years). The Company does not anticipate a significant
change to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the
next twelve months.
The
Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties
accrued on any unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income
tax expense. The Company has not accrued any interest associated
with its unrecognized tax benefits in the years ended December 31,
2018 and 2017.
12.
Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
The
following table presents quarterly unaudited consolidated financial
information for the eight quarters preceding December 31,
2018. Such information is presented on the same basis as the annual
information presented in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements. In management’s opinion, this information
reflects all normal recurring adjustments that are necessary for a
fair statement of the results for these periods.
|
Quarter Ended
|
|||||||
|
Dec 31,
2018
|
Sep 30,
2018 (1)
|
Jun 30,
2018
|
Mar 31,
2018 (2)
|
Dec 31,
2017 (3)
|
Sep 30,
2017
|
Jun 30,
2017
|
Mar 31,
2017
|
|
(in thousands, except per-share amounts)
|
|||||||
Total
net revenues
|
$32,253
|
$31,695
|
$29,292
|
$32,349
|
$33,321
|
$36,872
|
$34,591
|
$37,341
|
Gross
profit (loss)
|
$5,640
|
$(3,597)
|
$5,527
|
$7,690
|
$8,139
|
$11,086
|
$10,636
|
$12,911
|
Net
income (loss)
|
$(5,285)
|
$(18,036)
|
$(5,217)
|
$(10,279)
|
$(65,840)
|
$69
|
$322
|
$484
|
Basic
earnings (loss) per share
|
$(0.41)
|
$(1.41)
|
$(0.41)
|
$(0.81)
|
$(5.22)
|
$0.01
|
$0.03
|
$0.04
|
Diluted
earnings (loss) per share
|
$(0.41)
|
$(1.41)
|
$(0.41)
|
$(0.81)
|
$(5.22)
|
$0.01
|
$0.02
|
$0.04
|
(1)
Net
loss in the quarter ended September 30, 2018 included license
intangible asset impairment of $9.0 million and customer
relationship intangible asset impairment of $1.6
million.
(2)
Net
loss in the quarter ended March 31, 2018 included goodwill
impairment of $5.1 million.
(3)
Net
loss in the quarter ended December 31, 2017 included goodwill
impairment of $37.7 million, tax provision related to valuation
allowance of $16.7 million, tax provision of $11.7 million due to
TCJA and a $0.6 million write-off related to SaleMove.
SCHEDULE
II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
||
|
2018
|
2017
|
2016
|
|
(in thousands)
|
||
Allowance
for bad debts:
|
|
|
|
Beginning
balance
|
$679
|
$643
|
$605
|
Additions
|
241
|
347
|
344
|
Write-offs
|
(475)
|
(311)
|
(306)
|
Ending
balance
|
$445
|
$679
|
$643
|
Allowance
for customer credits:
|
|
|
|
Beginning
balance
|
$213
|
$371
|
$439
|
Additions
|
198
|
247
|
592
|
Write-offs
|
(290)
|
(405)
|
(660)
|
Ending
balance
|
$121
|
$213
|
$371
|
Tax
valuation allowance:
|
|
|
|
Beginning
balance
|
$21,318
|
$4,656
|
$5,427
|
Charged
(credited) to tax expense
|
7,369
|
21,247
|
(771)
|
Charged
(credited) to retained earnings
|
—
|
(4,585)
|
—
|
Ending
balance
|
$28,687
|
$21,318
|
$4,656
|
F-28