BANK OF SOUTH CAROLINA CORP - Annual Report: 2017 (Form 10-K)

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017

For the transition period from __________ to __________

Commission file number: 0-27702

 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) 

  Issuer’s telephone number: (843) 724-1500

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: 

(Title of Class)

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. 

☐ Yes ☒ No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. 

☐ Yes ☒ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. 

Yes ☒  No☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for a shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). 

Yes ☒  No☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period by complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

Aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates, computed by reference to the closing price of such stock on June 30, 2017 was $64,613,716.

As of February 15, 2018, the Registrant has outstanding 4,990,879 shares of common stock. 

BANK OF SOUTH CAROLINA CORPORATION 

AND SUBSIDIARY

Table of Contents 

PART I

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report, including information included or incorporated by reference in this document, contains statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1934. We desire to take advantage of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1996 and are including this statement for the express purpose of availing the Bank of South Carolina Corporation (the “Company”) of protections of such safe harbor with respect to all “forward-looking statements” contained in this Form 10-K. Forward-looking statements may relate to, among other matters, the financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance, and business of the Company. Forward-looking statements are based on many assumptions and estimates and are not guarantees of future performance. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, as they will depend on many factors about which we are unsure, including many factors that are beyond our control. The words “may,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “predict,” “project,” “potential,” “continue,” “assume,” “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” “forecast,” “goal,” and “estimate,” as well as similar expressions, are meant to identify such forward-looking statements. Potential risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements include, without limitations, those described under the heading “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and the following:

We will undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. In addition, certain statements in future filings with the SEC, in our press releases, and in oral and written statements, which are not statements of historical fact, constitute forward-looking statements.

General

The Bank of South Carolina (the “Bank”) was organized on October 22, 1986 and opened for business as a state-chartered financial institution on February 26, 1987, in Charleston, South Carolina. The Bank was reorganized into a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, effective April 17, 1995. At the time of the reorganization, each outstanding share of the Bank was exchanged for two shares of Company stock.

Market Area

The Bank operates as an independent, community oriented, commercial bank providing a broad range of financial services and products to the Charleston – North Charleston metro area, which includes Charleston, Berkeley, and Dorchester county. We have four banking house locations: 256 Meeting Street, Charleston, SC; 100 North Main Street, Summerville, SC; 1337 Chuck Dawley Boulevard, Mt. Pleasant, SC; and 2027 Sam Rittenberg Boulevard, Charleston, SC. We intend to open a banking office in North Charleston, SC on Highway 78 and Ingleside Boulevard in the future (copy of the lease incorporated as Exhibit 10.13 in the June 30, 2017 Form 10-Q).

The Charleston – North Charleston metro area grew 15.2% between 2011 and 2016 according to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. The primary economic drivers of our market area are manufacturing, tourism, technology, and the healthcare industry. This includes manufacturing campuses for Boeing, Volvo Cars, and Mercedes-Benz Vans’ in the area. Tourism has also contributed to the economic growth as both Conde Nast Traveler and Travel Leisure Magazine have recognized the area as a top tourism destination. Additionally, Charleston is considered the number one mid-sized U.S. metro area for IT growth according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.

References to “we,” “us,” “our,” “the Bank,” or “the Company” refer to the parent and its subsidiary, that are consolidated for financial purposes.

The Company (ticker symbol: BKSC) is publicly traded on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations (“NASDAQ”), and is under the reporting authority of the SEC. All of our electronic filings with the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and other documents filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, are accessible at no cost on our website, http://www.banksc.com, through the “Investor Relations” link. Our filings are also available through the SEC’s web site at http://www.sec.gov or by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.

Competition

The financial services industry is highly competitive. We face competition in attracting deposits and originating loans based upon a variety of factors including: 

We compete with commercial banks, savings institutions, finance companies, credit unions and other financial services companies. Many of our larger commercial bank competitors have greater name recognition and offer certain services that we do not. However, we believe that we have developed an effective competitive advantage in our market area by emphasizing exceptional service and possessing of local trends and conditions.

Lending Activities

We focus our lending activities on small and middle market businesses, professionals and individuals in our geographic markets and typically require personal guarantees. Our primary lending activities are for commercial, commercial real estate, and consumer purposes, with the largest category being commercial real estate. Most of our lending activity is to borrowers within our market area.

Commercial Loans

As of December 31, 2017, $51.7 million, or 19.14%, of our loan portfolio consisted of commercial loans. We originate various types of secured and unsecured commercial loans to customers in our market area in order to provide customers with working capital and funds for other general business purposes. The term of these loans generally range from less than one year to 10 years. These loans bear either a fixed interest rate or an interest rate linked to a variable market index, depending on the individual loan, its purpose, and underwriting of that loan.

Commercial credit decisions are based upon our credit assessment of each applicant. We evaluate the applicant’s ability to repay in accordance with the proposed terms of the loan and we assess the risks involved. In addition to evaluating the applicant’s financial statements, we consider the adequacy of the primary and secondary sources of repayment for the loan. Credit agency reports of the applicant’s personal credit history supplement our analysis of the applicant’s creditworthiness. In addition, collateral supporting a secured transaction is analyzed to determine its marketability. Commercial business loans generally have higher interest rates than residential loans of similar duration because they have a higher risk of default with repayment generally depending on the successful operation of the borrower’s business and the adequacy of any collateral.

Commercial Real Estate Loans

As of December 31, 2017, commercial real estate construction loans comprised $2.3 million, or 0.86%, of our loan portfolio. We make construction loans for commercial properties to businesses. Advances on construction loans are in accordance with a schedule reflecting the cost of construction. Loans are typically underwritten with a maximum loan to value ratio of 80% based on current appraisals with value defined as the purchase price, appraised value, or cost of construction, whichever is lower. Repayment of construction loans on non-residential and income-producing properties is normally attributable to rental income, income from the borrower’s operating entity, or the sale of the property. Construction loans are interest-only during the construction period, which typically does not exceed 12 months and are often paid-off with permanent financing.

Before making a commitment to fund a construction loan, we require an appraisal of the property by a state-certified or state-licensed appraiser. We review and inspect properties before disbursement of funds during the term of the construction loan.

Construction financing generally involves greater credit risk than long-term financing on improved, owner-occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan depends largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the value of the property at completion of construction compared to the estimated cost (including interest) of construction and other assumptions. Construction loans also expose us to risk that improvements will not be completed on time in accordance with specifications and projected costs.

As of December 31, 2017, $140.2 million, or 51.89%, of our loan portfolio consisted of other commercial real estate loans, excluding commercial construction loans. Properties securing our commercial real estate loans are primarily comprised of business owner-occupied properties, small office buildings and office suites, and income-producing real estate.

We base our decision to lend primarily on the economic viability of the property and the creditworthiness of the borrower. In evaluating a proposed commercial real estate loan, we emphasize the ratio of the property’s projected net cash flow to the loan’s debt service requirement computed after a deduction for an appropriate vacancy factor and reasonable expenses. We typically require property casualty insurance, title insurance, earthquake insurance, wind and hail coverage, and, if appropriate, flood insurance, in order to protect our security interest in the underlying property.

Commercial real estate loans generally carry higher credit risks, as they typically involve larger loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. In addition, the payment of loans secured by income-producing properties typically depends on the successful operation of the property, as repayment of the loan generally is dependent, in large part, on sufficient income from the property to cover operating expenses and debt service. Changes in economic conditions not within the control of the borrower or lender could affect the value of the underlying collateral or the future cash flow of the property.

Consumer Loans

Consumer real estate loans were $70.8 million, or 26.20%, of the loan portfolio as of December 31, 2017. Consumer real estate loans consist of consumer construction loans, consumer real estate loans, HELOCs, and mortgage originations. We make construction loans for owner-occupied residential properties. Advances on construction loans are in accordance with a schedule reflecting the cost of construction, but are limited to a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 80%. Before making a commitment to fund a construction loan, we require an appraisal of the property by a state-certified or state-licensed appraiser. We review and inspect properties before disbursement of funds during the term of the construction loan. Construction financing generally involves greater credit risk than long-term financing on improved, owner-occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan depends largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the value of the property at completion of construction compared to the estimated cost (including interest) of construction and other assumptions. Construction loans also expose us to risk that improvements will not be completed on time in accordance with specifications and projected costs.

Consumer real estate loans consist of loans secured by first or second mortgages on primary residences, and originate as adjustable-rate or fixed-rate loans. Owner-occupied properties located in the Company’s market area serve as the collateral for these loans. The Company currently originates residential mortgage loans for our portfolio with a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 80% for traditional owner-occupied homes.

In addition to consumer real estate loans, we offer home equity loans and lines of credit secured by the borrower’s primary or secondary residence. Our home equity loans and lines of credit currently originate with adjustable- rate with a floor. We generally underwrite home equity loans and lines of credit with the same criteria that we use to underwrite mortgage loans to be sold. For a borrower’s primary and secondary residences, home equity loans and lines of credit are typically underwritten with a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 80% when combined with the principal balance of the existing mortgage loan. We require a current appraisal or internally prepared real estate evaluations on home equity loans and lines of credit. At the time we close a home equity loan or line of credit, we record a mortgage to perfect our security interest in the underlying collateral.

All residential loans that we originate are underwritten pursuant to our policies and procedures. We originate both adjustable-rate and fixed-rate loans. A rising interest rate environment that typically results in decreased loan demand may adversely affect our loan origination and sales activity.

Other consumer loans totaled $5.2 million and were 1.91% of the loan portfolio as of December 31, 2017. These loans are originated for various purposes, including the purchase of automobiles, boats, and other legitimate personal purposes.

Consumer loans may entail greater credit risk than mortgage loans to be sold, particularly in the case of consumer loans that are unsecured or are secured by rapidly depreciable assets, such as automobiles. In addition, consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and thus are more likely to be affected by adverse personal circumstances. The application of various federal and state laws, including bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may also limit the amount which can be recovered on such loans.

Loan Approval Procedures and Authority

Our lending activities follow written, non-discriminatory underwriting standards and loan origination procedures established by the Board of Directors of the Bank. The loan approval process is intended to assess the borrower’s ability to repay the loan and the value of the collateral that will secure the loan. To assess the borrower’s ability to repay, we review the borrower’s employment, credit history, and information on the historical and projected income and expenses of the borrower.

The objectives of our lending program are to: 

The underwriting standards and loan origination procedures include officer lending limits, which are approved by the Board of Directors. The individual secured/unsecured lending authority of the President/Chief Executive Officer of the Bank is set at $1,500,000 and the individual secured/unsecured lending authority of the Senior Lender/Executive Vice President is set at $750,000. The President/Chief Executive Officer of the Bank and the Senior Lender/Executive Vice President may jointly lend up to 10% of the Bank’s unimpaired capital for the previous quarter end. In the absence of either of the above, the other may, jointly with the approval of either the Chairman of the Board of Directors or a majority of the Loan Committee of the Board of Directors, lend up to 10% of the Bank’s unimpaired capital for the previous quarter end. The Board of Directors, with two-thirds vote, may approve the aggregate credit in excess of this limit but may not exceed 15% of the Bank’s unimpaired capital. Loan limits apply to the total direct and indirect liability of the borrower. All loans above the loan officer’s authority must have the approval of a loan officer with the authority to approve a loan of that amount. Pooling of loan authority is not allowed except as outlined above for the President/Chief Executive Officer, Senior Lender/Executive Vice President, a majority of the Loan Committee or two-thirds of the Board of Directors.

All new credit which results in aggregate direct, indirect, and related credit, not under an approved line of credit of a threshold set forth in our loan policy, with the exceptions of mortgage loans in the process of being sold to investors and loans secured by properly margined negotiable securities traded on an established market or other cash collateral, are reviewed in detail on a monthly basis by the Loan Committee. Certain new credits that meet a higher threshold than required for the Loan Committee are reviewed by the Board of Directors of the Bank at its regular monthly meeting.

Employees

At December 31, 2017, we employed 77 people, with three individuals considered part time and one individual considered hourly, none of whom are subject to a collective bargaining agreement. We provide a variety of benefit programs including an Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust, Stock Incentive Plan, health, life, disability and other insurance. We believe our relationship with our employees is excellent.

Supervision and Regulation

We are subject to extensive state and federal banking laws and regulations that impose specific requirements or restrictions and provide for general regulatory oversight of virtually all aspects of operations. The regulations are primarily intended to protect depositors, customers, and the integrity of the U.S. banking system and capital markets. The following information describes some of the more significant laws and regulations applicable to us. The description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the applicable laws and regulations. Proposals to change the laws and regulations governing the banking industry are frequently raised in Congress, in state legislatures, and with the various bank regulatory agencies. Changes in applicable laws or regulations, or a change in the way such laws or regulations are interpreted by regulatory agencies or courts, may have a material impact on our business operations and earnings.

Dodd-Frank Act

On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) became effective. This law has broadly affected the financial services industry by implementing changes to the financial regulatory landscape aimed at strengthening the sound operation of the financial services industry, and will continue to significantly change the current bank regulatory structure and affect the lending, deposit, investment, trading and operating activities of financial institutions and their holding companies, including the Company and the Bank.

The Dodd-Frank Act created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”) as an agency to centralize responsibility for consumer financial protection, including implementing, examining and enforcing compliance with federal consumer financial laws. The CFPB exercises supervisory review of banks under its jurisdiction. The CFPB focuses its rulemaking in several areas, particularly in the areas of mortgage reform involving the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, the Truth in Lending Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. There are many provisions in the Dodd-Frank Act mandating regulators to adopt new regulations and conduct studies upon which future regulation may be based. Governmental intervention and new regulations could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Volcker Rule

Section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Act, known as the “Volcker Rule,” prohibits any bank, bank holding company, or affiliate (referred to collectively as “banking entities”) from engaging in two types of activities: proprietary trading and the ownership or sponsorship of private equity or hedge funds that are referred to as covered funds. Proprietary trading, in general, is trading in securities on a short-term basis for a banking entity’s own account. In December 2013, federal banking agencies, the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, finalized a regulation to implement the Volcker Rule. At December 31, 2017, the Company has evaluated our securities portfolio and has determined that we do not hold any covered funds.

Bank Holding Company Act

The Company is a one-bank holding company under the federal Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. As a result, the Company is primarily subject to the supervision, examination and reporting requirements of the Board of Governors (the “Federal Reserve Board”) of the Federal Reserve Bank (the “Federal Reserve”) under the Act and its regulations promulgated thereunder. Moreover, as a bank holding company located in South Carolina, the Company is also subject to the regulations of the South Carolina State Board of Financial Institutions.

Capital Requirements

The Federal Reserve Board imposes certain capital requirements on the Company under the Bank Holding Company Act, including a minimum leverage ratio and minimum ratio of “qualifying” capital to risk-weighted assets. These requirements are essentially the same as those that apply to the Bank and are described under “Regulatory Capital Requirements” in the notes to the financial statements. The ability of the Company to pay dividends to shareholders depends on the Bank’s ability to pay dividends to the Company, which is subject to regulatory restrictions as described below in “Dividends.”

Standards for Safety and Soundness

The Federal Deposit Insurance Act requires the federal banking regulatory agencies to prescribe, by regulation or guideline, operational and managerial standards for all insured depository institutions relating to (1) internal controls, information systems and internal audit systems, (2) loan documentation, (3) credit underwriting, (4) interest rate risk exposure, and (5) asset growth. The agencies also must prescribe standards for asset quality, earnings, and stock valuation, as well as standards for compensation, fees, and benefits. The federal banking agencies have adopted regulations and “Interagency Guidelines Establishing Standards for Safety and Soundness” to implement these required standards. These guidelines set forth the safety and soundness standards that the federal banking agencies use to identify and address problems at insured depository institutions before capital becomes impaired.

Regulatory Examination

All insured institutions must undergo regular on-site examinations by their appropriate banking agency. The cost of examinations of insured depository institutions and any affiliates may be assessed by the appropriate banking agency against each institution or affiliate, as it deems necessary or appropriate. Insured institutions are required to submit annual reports to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), their federal regulatory agency, and state supervisor when applicable.

The federal banking regulatory agencies prescribe, by regulation, standards for all insured depository institutions and depository institution holding companies relating to, among other things, the following:

Transactions with Affiliates and Insiders

We are subject to certain restrictions on extensions of credit to executive officers, directors, certain principal shareholders, and their related interests. Such extensions of credit must be made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates, and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with third parties and must not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable features.

Dividends

The Company’s principal source of cash flow, including cash flow to pay dividends to its shareholders, is dividends it receives from the Bank. Statutory and regulatory limitations apply to the Bank’s payment of dividends to the Company. As a general rule, the amount of a dividend may not exceed, without prior regulatory approval, the sum of net income in the calendar year to date and the retained net earnings of the immediately preceding two calendar years. A depository institution may not pay any dividend if payment would cause the institution to become undercapitalized or if it already is undercapitalized.

Consumer Protection Regulations

Activities of the Bank are subject to a variety of statutes and regulations designed to protect consumers. Interest and other charges collected by the Bank are subject to state usury laws and federal laws concerning interest rates. Our loan operations are also subject to federal laws applicable to credit transactions, such as:

The deposit operations of the Bank also are subject to:

Enforcement Powers

The Company is subject to supervision and examination by the Federal Reserve and the South Carolina State Board of Financial Institutions. The Bank is subject to extensive federal and state regulations that significantly affect business and activities. These regulatory bodies have broad authority to implement standards and to initiate proceedings designed to prohibit depository institutions from engaging in activities that represent unsafe or unsound banking practices or constitute violations of applicable laws, rules, regulations, administrative orders, or written agreements with regulators. These regulatory bodies are authorized to take action against institutions that fail to meet such standards, including the assessment of civil monetary penalties, the issuance of cease-and-desist orders, and other actions.

Bank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money Laundering

We are subject to the Bank Secrecy Act and other anti-money laundering laws and regulations, including the USA Patriot Act of 2001. We must maintain a Bank Secrecy Act Program that includes established internal policies, procedures, and controls; a designated compliance officer; an ongoing employee-training program; and testing of the program by an independent audit function. The enactment of the USA Patriot Act amended and expanded the focus of the Bank Secrecy Act to facilitate information sharing among governmental entities and the Company for the purpose of combating terrorism and money laundering. It improves anti-money laundering and financial transparency laws, information collection tools and the enforcement mechanics for the U.S. government. These provisions include (a) standards for verifying customer identification at account opening; (b) rules to promote cooperation among financial institutions, regulators, and law enforcement entities in identifying parties that may be involved in terrorism or money laundering; (c) reports by nonfinancial trades and businesses filed with the U.S. Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network for transactions exceeding $10,000; (d) suspicious activities reports by brokers and dealers if they believe a customer may be violating U.S. laws; and (e) regulations and enhanced due diligence requirements for financial institutions that administer, maintain, or manage private bank accounts or correspondent accounts for non-U.S. persons.

Similar in purpose to the Bank Secrecy Act, the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”), a division of the U.S. Department of Treasury, controls and imposes economic and trade sanctions based on U.S. foreign policy and national security goals against targeted countries and individuals based on threats to foreign policy, national security, or the U.S. economy. OFAC has and will send banking regulatory agencies lists of names of individuals and organizations suspected of aiding, concealing, or engaging in terrorist acts. Among other things, the Bank must block transactions with or accounts of sanctioned persons and report those transactions after their occurrence.

Bank regulators routinely examine institutions for compliance with these obligations and are required to consider compliance in connection with the regulatory review of applications.

Privacy and Credit Reporting

In connection with our lending activities, we are subject to a number of federal laws designed to protect borrowers and promote lending to various sectors of the economy and population. These include the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Truth-in-Lending Act, the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, and the Community Reinvestment Act (the “CRA”). The CRA requires the appropriate federal banking agency, in connection with its examination of a bank, to assess the bank’s record in meeting the credit needs of the communities served by the bank, including low and moderate income neighborhoods. Under the CRA, institutions are assigned a rating of “outstanding,” “satisfactory,” “needs to improve,” or “substantial non-compliance.” In addition, federal banking regulators, pursuant to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, have enacted regulations limiting the ability of banks and other financial institutions to disclose nonpublic consumer information to non-affiliated third parties. The regulations require disclosure of privacy policies and allow consumers to prevent certain personal information from being shared with nonaffiliated third parties.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

Under the filer category of “smaller reporting company”, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, the Company is not required to provide information requested by Part I, Item 1A of its Form 10-K.

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

The Company’s headquarters is located at 256 Meeting Street in downtown Charleston, South Carolina. This site is also the location of the main office of the Bank. The Bank also operates from three additional locations: 100 North Main Street, Summerville, SC; 1337 Chuck Dawley Boulevard, Mount Pleasant, SC; and 2027 Sam Rittenberg Boulevard, Charleston, SC. The Bank’s mortgage department is located at 1071 Morrison Drive, Charleston, SC. On January 28, 2014, we signed a lease to open a banking office on Highway 78 and Ingleside Boulevard, North Charleston, SC in the future (copy of the lease incorporated as Exhibit 10.8 in the 2013 10-K and copy of the Assignment and Assumption of Lease incorporated as Exhibit 10.9, First Amendment to the Lease incorporated as Exhibit 10.10 and Second Amendment to the Lease incorporated as Exhibit 10.11 in the 2015 10-K). On July 31, 2017, a new lease agreement was authorized and is incorporated as Exhibit 10.13 filed with the June 30, 2017 Form 10-Q. The Company owns the 2027 Sam Rittenberg Boulevard location, which houses the Operations Department of the Bank as well as operating as a banking office. The Company leases all other locations. The owned location is not encumbered and all of the leases have renewal options. Each banking location is suitable and adequate for banking operations.

In our opinion, there are no other legal proceedings pending other than routine litigation incidental to the Company’s business involving amounts that are not material to our financial condition.

Not applicable.

PART II

At December 31, 2017, there were 5,230,675 shares issued and 4,989,279 shares outstanding of the 12,000,000 authorized shares of common stock of the Company. Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ under the trading symbol “BKSC”.

Information regarding the historical market prices of our common stock and dividends declared on that stock is shown below.

As of February 15, 2018, there were approximately 1,909 shareholders of record with shares held by individuals and in nominee names. The market price for our common stock as of February 15, 2018, was $19.13.

The future payment of cash dividends is subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors and depends upon a number of factors, including future earnings, financial condition, cash requirements, and general business conditions. Cash dividends, when declared, are paid by the Bank to the Company for distribution to shareholders of the Company. Certain regulatory requirements restrict the amount of dividends that the Bank can pay to the Company.

At our December 1995 Board Meeting, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 140,918 shares of its common stock on the open market. At our October 1999 Board Meeting, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 45,752 shares of its common stock on the open market and again at our September 2001 Board meeting, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 54,903 shares of its common stock on the open market. As of the date of this report, the Company owns 241,396 shares, adjusted for three 10% stock dividends, a 10% stock distribution, and a 25% stock dividend. At the Annual Meeting in April 2007, the shareholders’ voted to increase the number of authorized shares from 6,000,000 to 12,000,000. As of February 15, 2018, there were 5,232,275 shares of common stock issued and 4,990,879 shares of common stock outstanding.

THE BANK OF SOUTH CAROLINA EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN AND TRUST

During 1989, the Board of Directors of the Bank adopted an Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust Agreement (“ESOP”) to provide retirement benefits to eligible employees of the Bank for long and faithful service. An amendment and restatement was made to the ESOP effective January 1, 2007 and approved by the Board of Directors January 18, 2007. Periodically, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) requires a restatement of a qualified retirement plan to ensure that the plan document includes provisions required by legislative and regulatory changes made since the last restatement. There have been no substantive changes to the plan, however, to comply with the IRS rules, the Board of Directors approved a restated plan, on January 26, 2012 (incorporated as Exhibit 10.5 in the 2011 10-K) and submitted the plan to the IRS for approval. The IRS issued a determination letter on September 26, 2013, stating that the plan satisfied the requirements of Code Section 4975 (e) (7). On January 26, 2017, the Board of Directors approved a restated plan (incorporated as Exhibit 10.6 in the 2016 10-K). The restated Plan was submitted to the IRS for approval and a determination letter was issued November 17, 2017, stating that the plan satisfies the requirements of Code Section 4975 (e) (7).

The Board of Directors of the Bank approved a cash contribution of $375,000 to The Bank of South Carolina ESOP for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. The Board of Directors of the Bank approved cash contributions of $345,000 and $315,000 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The contributions were made during the respective fiscal years.

An employee of the Bank who is not a member of an ineligible class of employees is eligible to participate in the plan upon reaching 21 years of age and being credited with one year of service (1,000 hours of service). All employees are eligible employees except for the following ineligible classes of employees:

The employee may enter the Plan on the January 1^st that occurs nearest the date on which the employee first satisfies the age and service requirements described above. No contributions by employees are permitted. The amount and time of contributions are at the sole discretion of the Board of Directors of the Bank. The contribution for all participants is based solely on each participant’s respective regular or base salary and wages paid by the Bank including commissions, bonuses and overtime, if any.

A participant becomes vested in the ESOP based upon the employee’s credited years of service. The vesting schedule is as follows:

The Bank is the Plan Administrator. Eugene H. Walpole, IV, Fleetwood S. Hassell, Sheryl G. Sharry and Douglas H. Sass, currently serve as the Plan Administrative Committee and Trustees for the Plan. At December 31, 2017, the Plan owned 286,013 shares of common stock of the Company.

THE BANK OF SOUTH CAROLINA STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN

We have a Stock Incentive Plan, which was approved in 1998, with 180,000 (329,422 adjusted for three 10% stock dividends, a 10% stock distribution, and a 25% stock dividend) shares reserved, and a Stock Incentive Plan, which was approved in 2010, with 300,000 (330,000 adjusted for a 10% stock dividend) shares reserved. Under both plans, options are periodically granted to employees at a price not less than the fair market value of the shares at the date of grant. Participating employees become 20% vested after five years and then vest 20% each year until fully vested. The right to exercise each such 20% of the options is cumulative and will not expire until the tenth anniversary of the date of the grant. Employees are eligible to participate in this plan if the Executive/Long-Range Planning Committee, in its sole discretion, determines that an employee has contributed or can be expected to contribute to our profits or growth.

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using a closed form option valuation (Black-Scholes) model. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatilities of our common stock. The expected term of the options granted will not exceed ten years from the date of grant (the amount of time options granted are expected to be outstanding). The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant.

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

The following table sets forth certain selected financial information concerning the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary. The information was derived from audited consolidated financial statements. The information should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” which follows, and the audited consolidated financial statements and notes, which are presented elsewhere in this report.

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Management’s discussion and analysis is included to assist the shareholder in understanding our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow. This discussion should be reviewed in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes presented in Item 8 of this report and the supplemental financial data appearing throughout this report. Since the primary asset of the Company is its wholly-owned subsidiary, most of the discussion and analysis relates to the Bank.

OVERVIEW

The Company is a bank holding company headquartered in Charleston, South Carolina, with $446,566,498 in assets as of December 31, 2017 and net income of $848,699 and $4,901,825, respectively, for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2017. The Company offers a broad range of financial services through its wholly owned subsidiary, the Bank. The Bank is a state-chartered commercial bank, which operates principally in the Charleston, Dorchester, and Berkeley counties of South Carolina. The Bank’s original and current concept is to be a full service financial institution specializing in personal service, responsiveness, and attention to detail to foster long-standing relationships.

We derive most of our income from interest on loans and investment securities. The primary source of funding for making these loans and investment securities is our interest and non-interest-bearing deposits. Consequently, one of the key measures of our success is the amount of net interest income, or the difference between the income on our interest-earning assets, such as loans and investments, and the expense on our interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits. Another key measure is the spread between the yield we earn on these interest-earning assets and the rate we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities.

A consequence of lending activities is that we may incur credit losses. The amount of such losses will vary depending upon the risk characteristics of the loan portfolio as affected by economic conditions such as rising interest rates and the financial performance of borrowers. The reserve for credit losses consists of the allowance for loan losses (the “allowance”) and a reserve for unfunded commitments (the “unfunded reserve”). The allowance provides for probable and estimable losses inherent in our loan portfolio while the unfunded reserve provides for potential losses related to unfunded lending commitments. The allowance is increased or decreased through the provisioning process. For a detailed discussion on the allowance for loan losses, see “Allowance for Loan Losses”.

In addition to earning interest on loans and investment securities, we earn income through fees and other expenses we charge to the customer. The various components of other income and other expenses are described in the following discussion. The discussion and analysis also identifies significant factors that have affected our financial position as of December 31, 2017 as compared to December 31, 2016 and our operating results for 2017 compared to 2016 and 2016 compared to 2015, and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in this report. In addition, a number of tables have been included to assist in the discussion.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

We have adopted various accounting policies that govern the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and with general practices within the banking industry in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Our significant accounting policies are set forth in the notes to the consolidated financial statements of this report.

Certain accounting policies involve significant judgments and assumptions made by the Company that have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities. We consider these accounting policies to be critical accounting policies. The judgment and assumptions we use are based on factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Because of the number of judgments and assumptions that we make, actual results could differ and have a material impact on the carrying values of our assets and liabilities and our results of operations.

We consider our policy regarding the allowance for loan losses to be our most subjective accounting policy due to the significant degree of judgment. We have developed what we believe to be appropriate policies and procedures for assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, recognizing that this process requires a number of assumptions and estimates with respect to our loan portfolio. Our assessments may be impacted in future periods by changes in economic conditions, the impact of regulatory examinations and the discovery of information with respect to borrowers, which were not known at the time of the issuance of the consolidated financial statements. For additional discussion concerning our allowance for loan losses and related matters, see “Allowance for Loan Losses”.

COMPARISON OF THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 TO DECEMBER 31, 2016

Net income decreased $345,238 or 6.58% to $4,901,825, or basic and diluted income per share of $0.99 and $0.97, respectively for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $5,247,063 or basic and diluted income per share of $1.06 and $1.04, respectively for the year ended December 31, 2016. The decrease in net income was primarily due to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on December 22, 2017 and the related revaluation of the deferred tax asset. Deferred tax assets and liabilities must be adjusted to legislation based on the enactment date not the effective date; therefore, the deferred tax asset was revalued at a corporate tax rate of 21% instead of 34% in accordance with GAAP at December 22, 2017. This revaluation resulted in additional income tax expense of $666,674. Our returns on average assets and average equity for the year ended December 31, 2017 were 1.14% and 11.37%, respectively, compared with 1.28% and 12.65%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Net interest income increased $828,427 or 5.55% to $15,745,284 for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $14,916,857 for the year ended December 31, 2016. This increase was primarily due to increases in interest and fees on loans and investment securities. Interest and fees on loans increased $435,418 or 3.89% to $13,287,318 for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $12,851,900 for the year ended December 31, 2016, as the result of the increases in the Federal Funds rate set by the Federal Reserve. Interest income on investment securities increased $306,944 or 13.32% to $2,612,018 for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $2,305,074 for the year ended December 31, 2016 a result of the increase in the average balance of investment securities from $110,762,289 for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $130,161,937 for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Average earning assets increased $16,214,247 or 4.03% to $418,602,052 for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $402,387,805 for the year ended December 31, 2016. This is primarily related to the increase in the average balance of investment securities as stated in the previous paragraph.

The provision to the allowance for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $55,000 compared to $570,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016. The decrease was primarily a result of slower loan growth in the first three quarters of the year and lower net charge-offs. The Board of Directors determined that this provision was appropriate based upon the strength of our reserve and the anticipation of continued loan growth and an improving economy. Charge-offs of $185,449 and recoveries of $154,230, together with the provision to the allowance, resulted in an allowance for loan losses of $3,875,398 or 1.43% of total loans at December 31, 2017.

Other income decreased $592,612 or 20.71% to $2,268,471 for the year ended December 31, 2017. Our mortgage banking income decreased $330,283 or 23.80% to $1,057,457 for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $1,387,740 for the year ended December 31, 2016 due to decreased volume. We were also impacted by an increase in competition as new banks enter the market area. Mortgage banking income is highly influenced by mortgage interest rates and the housing market. Mortgage loan originations decreased $20,241,046 or 26.62% to $55,791,625 for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $76,032,671 for the year ended December 31, 2016. We also had gains of $380,904 on the sales of investment securities during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to gains of $45,820 during the year ended December 31, 2017, a decrease of $335,084 or 87.97%. The decrease in gains was due to the little difference between short-term and long-term rates for bonds of the same credit quality in the current market.

Other expense decreased $30,148 or 0.29% to $10,242,296 for the year ended December 31, 2017, from $10,272,444 for the year ended December 31, 2016. Salaries and employee benefits decreased $27,098 or 0.45% from $6,087,929 for the year ended December 31, 2016 to $6,060,831 for the year ended December 31, 2017. Other operating expenses decreased $122,039 to $2,517,737 during the year ended December 31, 2017 from $2,639,776 during the year ended December 31, 2016. This decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in state and FDIC insurance and fees. Our net occupancy expense increased $43,028 or 2.82% to $1,571,076 for the year ended December 31, 2017, from $1,528,048 for the year ended December 31, 2016. Our net occupancy expense includes rent and insurance on our banking locations as well as the cost of repairs and maintenance on these facilities. Occupancy expense increased primarily due to annual rent increases at our Meeting Street and Summerville banking locations as well as an increase in insurance on banking locations, offset by a decrease in the cost of maintenance and repairs and depreciation on furniture, fixtures and equipment.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company’s effective tax rate was 36.48% compared to 24.34% during the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase in the effective tax rate is directly related to the income tax expense recorded due to the revaluation of the deferred tax asset. As a result of the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act changing the corporate tax rate to 21% from 34%, the deferred tax asset was revalued on December 22, 2017. This revaluation resulted in additional income tax expense of $666,674.

COMPARISON OF THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2016 TO DECEMBER 31, 2015

Net income increased $362,775 or 7.43% to $5,247,063, or basic and diluted income per share of $1.06 and $1.04, respectively for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $4,884,288 or basic and diluted income per share of $0.99 and $0.96, respectively for the year ended December 31, 2015. This increase is primarily due to increases in interest and fees on loans offset by higher provision for loan losses expense and lower mortgage banking income. Our returns on average assets and average equity for the year ended December 31, 2016 were 1.28% and 12.65%, respectively, compared with 1.29% and 12.64%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Net interest income increased $1,089,304 or 7.88% to $14,916,857 for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $13,827,553 for the year ended December 31, 2015. This increase was primarily due to increases in interest and fees on loans and other interest income. Interest and fees on loans increased $1,056,597 or 8.96% to $12,851,900 for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $11,795,303 for the year ended December 31, 2015, as the result of higher average loan balances, an improving local economy, and consumer confidence. Other interest income, earned mostly on interest-bearing deposits in other banks, increased $93,057 or 204.22% to $138,623 for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $45,566 for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Average earning assets increased $30,474,873 or 8.19% to $402,387,805 for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $371,912,932 for the year ended December 31, 2015. Average loans increased $21,421,628 or 8.79% for the year ended December 31, 2016. Average interest-bearing deposits in other banks increased $8,924,355 or 50.85% to $26,474,258 for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $17,549,903 for the year ended December 31, 2015.

The provision to the allowance for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $570,000 compared to $192,500 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase was primarily a result of loan growth. The Board of Directors determined that this provision was appropriate based upon the strength of our reserve and the anticipation of continued loan growth and an improving economy. Charge-offs of $208,295, recoveries of $72,085, together with the provision to the allowance, resulted in an allowance for loan losses of $3,851,617 or 1.48% of total loans at December 31, 2016.

Non-interest income decreased $188,875 or 6.19% to $2,861,083 for the year ended December 31, 2016. Our mortgage banking income decreased $217,936 or 13.57% to $1,387,740 for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $1,605,676 for the year ended December 31, 2015 due to the loss of two loan originators during 2016. Mortgage banking income is highly influenced by mortgage interest rates and the housing market. According to local real estate market reports, the sales volume in the Charleston market increased 10% for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015. The Charleston market had 17,114 home sales during 2016 with a median sales price of $245,000 compared to 16,202 home sales in 2015 at a median price of $229,000. Mortgage loan originations decreased $15,021,252 or 16.50% to $76,032,671 for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $91,053,923 for the year ended December 31, 2015. Service charges, fees and commissions increased $70,342 to $1,061,349 for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $991,007 for the year ended December 31, 2015. This increase was primarily due to an increase of $52,416 in debit card fees resulting from increased usage particularly by our business customers. We also had gains of $380,904 on the sales of investment securities during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to gains of $423,832 during the year ended December 31, 2015.

Other expense increased $758,969 or 7.98% to $10,272,444 for the year ended December 31, 2016, from $9,513,475 for the year ended December 31, 2015. Salaries and employee benefits increased $228,726 or 3.90% from $5,859,203 for the year ended December 31, 2015 to $6,087,929 for the year ended December 31, 2016. Base wages increased $134,013 to $4,768,176 for the year ended December 31, 2016. This increase was primarily due to annual merit increases. Our contribution to the ESOP increased from $315,000 in 2015 to $345,000 for 2016.

Other operating expenses increased $471,394. During 2016, the Company invested in a South Carolina Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credit of $937,211, which will be amortized over three years. As of December 31, 2016, the balance of the credit was $612,211. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company amortized $325,000 of the credit.

Our net occupancy expense increased $47,442 or 3.20% to $1,528,048 for the year ended December 31, 2016, from $1,480,606 for the year ended December 31, 2015. Our net occupancy expense includes rent and insurance on our banking locations as well as the cost of repairs and maintenance on these facilities. Occupancy expense increased primarily due to annual rent increases at our Meeting Street and Summerville banking locations as well as an increase in insurance on banking locations, offset by a decrease in the cost of maintenance and repairs and depreciation on furniture, fixtures and equipment.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company’s effective tax rate was 24.34% compared to 31.89% during the year ended December 31, 2015. The Company invested in a South Carolina Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credit during 2016, which resulted in a decrease to the effective rate.

ASSET AND LIABILITY MANAGEMENT

We manage our assets and liabilities to ensure there is sufficient liquidity to enable management to fund deposit withdrawals, loan demand, capital expenditures, reserve requirements, operating expenses, and dividends; and to manage daily operations on an ongoing basis. Funds are primarily provided by the Bank through customer deposits, principal and interest payments on loans, mortgage loan sales, the sale or maturity of securities, temporary investments and earnings. The Asset Liability/Investment Committee (“ALCO”) manages asset and liability procedures though the ultimate responsibility rests with the President/Chief Executive Officer. At December 31, 2017, total assets increased 7.88% to $446,566,498 and total deposits increased 8.15% to $402,888,300 from December 31 2016.

As of December 31, 2017, earning assets, which are composed of U.S. Treasury, Government Sponsored Enterprises and Municipal Securities in the amount of $139,250,250, interest-bearing deposits at the Federal Reserve in the amount of $24,034,194 and total loans, including mortgage loans held for sale, in the amount of $272,274,363, consisted of approximately 97.54% of our total assets.

The yield on a majority of our earning assets adjusts in tandem with changes in the general level of interest rates. Some of the Company’s deposit liabilities are issued with fixed terms and can be repriced only at maturity.

MARKET RISK

Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. Our risk consists primarily of interest rate risk in our lending and investing activities as they relate to the funding by deposit and borrowing activities.

Our policy is to minimize interest rate risk between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities at various maturities and to attempt to maintain an asset sensitive position over a six-month period. By adhering to this policy, we anticipate that our net interest margins will not be materially affected, unless there is an extraordinary precipitous change in interest rates. The average net interest rate spread for 2017 increased to 3.70% from 3.64% for 2016 and the average net interest margin for 2017 increased to 3.76% from 3.71% for 2016. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, our net cumulative gap was liability sensitive for periods less than one year and asset sensitive for periods of one year or more. The reason for the shift in sensitivity is the direct result of management’s strategic decision to invest excess funds held at the Federal Reserve into fixed rate investment securities that match our investment policy objectives. Management is aware of this departure from policy and will continue to closely monitor our sensitivity position going forward.

Since the rates on most of our interest-bearing liabilities can vary on a daily basis, we continue to maintain a loan portfolio priced predominately on a variable rate basis. However, in an effort to protect future earnings in a declining rate environment, we offer certain fixed rates, interest rate floors, and terms primarily associated with real estate transactions. We seek stable, long-term deposit relationships to fund our loan portfolio. Furthermore, we do not have any brokered deposits or internet deposits.

At December 31, 2017, the average maturity of the investment portfolio was 3.90 years with an average yield of 2.04% compared to 4.13 years with an average yield of 1.99% at December 31, 2016.

We do not take foreign exchange or commodity risks. In addition, we do not own mortgage-backed securities nor do we have any exposure to the sub-prime market or any other distressed debt instruments.

The following table summarizes our interest sensitivity position as of December 31, 2017.

LIQUIDITY

Historically, we have maintained our liquidity at levels believed by management to be adequate to meet requirements of normal operations, potential deposit outflows and strong loan demand and still allow for optimal investment of funds and return on assets.

The following table summarizes future contractual obligations as of December 31, 2017.

Proper liquidity management is crucial to ensure that we are able to take advantage of new business opportunities as well as meet the credit needs of our existing customers. Investment securities are an important tool in our liquidity management. Our primary liquid assets are cash and due from banks, investments available for sale, interest-bearing deposits at the Federal Reserve, and mortgage loans held for sale. Our primary liquid assets accounted for 38.93% and 36.38% of total assets at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Investment securities classified as available for sale, which are not pledged, may be sold in response to changes in interest rates and liquidity needs. All of the investment securities presently owned are classified as available for sale. Net cash provided by operations and deposits from customers have been the primary sources of liquidity. At December 31, 2017, we had unused short-term lines of credit totaling approximately $23.0 million (which can be withdrawn at the lender’s option). Additional sources of funds available to us for liquidity include increasing deposits by raising interest rates paid and selling mortgage loans held for sale. We also established a Borrower-In-Custody arrangement with the Federal Reserve. This arrangement permits us to retain possession of assets pledged as collateral to secure advances from the Federal Reserve Discount Window. At December 31, 2017, we could borrow up to $88.2 million. There have been no borrowings under this arrangement.

Our core deposits consist of non-interest bearing demand accounts, NOW accounts, money market accounts, time deposits and savings accounts. We closely monitor our reliance on certificates of deposit greater than $250,000 and other large deposits. We maintain a Contingency Funding Plan (“CFP”) that identifies liquidity needs and weighs alternate courses of action designed to address these needs in emergency situations. We perform a quarterly cash flow analysis and stress test the CFP to evaluate the expected funding needs and funding capacity during a liquidity stress event. We believe our liquidity sources are adequate to meet our operating needs and do not know of any trends, events or uncertainties that may result in a significant adverse effect on our liquidity position. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, our liquidity ratio was 37.68% and 38.27%, respectively.

Average earning assets increased by $16,214,247 from 2016 to 2017. This increase was primarily due to a $19,399,648 increase in investment securities available for sale. Throughout the year, the Bank bought investment securities when liquidity was greater than needed and loan demand was stable to improve the yield earned on our investment securities portfolio.

The following table shows the composition of average assets over the past five fiscal years.

Composition of Average Assets

ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME

The following table shows changes in interest income and expense based upon changes in volume and changes in rates.

YIELDS ON AVERAGE EARNING ASSETS AND RATES ON AVERAGE INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES

The following table shows the yields on average earning assets and average interest-bearing liabilities.

INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO

The following tables summarize the carrying value of investment securities as of the indicated dates and the weighted-average yields of those securities at December 31, 2017.

The following tables present the amortized cost and market value of investment securities for the past three years.

At December 31, 2017, we had eight U.S. Treasury Notes with an unrealized loss of $411,145 compared to four U.S. Treasury Notes with an unrealized loss of $250,385 at December 31, 2016. At December 31, 2017, we had 15 Government-Sponsored Enterprises with an unrealized loss of $887,811 compared to eight Government-Sponsored Enterprises with an unrealized loss of $833,321 at December 31, 2016. At December 31, 2017, we had 49 Municipal Securities with an unrealized loss of $545,146 compared to 54 Municipal Securities with an unrealized loss of $816,413 at December 31, 2016. Interest rate increases caused the unrealized losses on these investments. The contractual terms of these investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the amortized cost of the investment. Therefore, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired. We have the ability to hold these investments until market price recovery or maturity.

The primary purpose of the investment portfolio is to fund loan demand, to manage fluctuations in deposits and liquidity, to satisfy pledging requirements and to generate a favorable return on investment.  In doing these things, our main objective is to adhere to sound investment practices.  To that end, all purchases and sales of investment securities are made through reputable securities dealers that have been approved by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors of the Bank review the entire investment portfolio at each regular monthly meeting, including any purchases, sales, calls, and maturities during the previous month.  Furthermore, the credit department conducts a financial underwriting assessment of all municipal securities and their corresponding municipalities annually and management reviews the assessments.

LOAN PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION

We focus our lending activities on small and middle market businesses, professionals and individuals in our geographic market. At December 31, 2017, outstanding loans (including mortgage loans and deferred loan fees of $152,047) totaled $270,180,640, which equaled 67.06% of total deposits and 60.50% of total assets.

The following is a schedule of our loan portfolio, excluding both mortgage loans to be sold and deferred loan fees, as of December 31, 2017, compared to the prior four years:

We had no foreign loans or loans to fund leveraged buyouts at any time during the years ended December 31, 2013 through December 31, 2017.

The following table presents the contractual terms to maturity for loans outstanding at December 31, 2017. Demand loans, loans having no stated schedule of repayment or stated maturity, and overdrafts are reported as due in one year or less. The table does not include an estimate of prepayments, which can significantly affect the average life of loans and may cause our actual principal experience to differ from that shown.

IMPAIRED LOANS

A loan is impaired when it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement based on current information and events. All loans placed on non-accrual status are classified as impaired. However, not all impaired loans are on non-accrual status nor do they all represent a loss.

Impairment loss is measured by:

The following is a schedule of our impaired loans and non-accrual loans.

TROUBLED DEBT RESTRUCTURINGS

According to GAAP, we are required to account for certain loan modifications or restructurings as a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”), when appropriate. In general, the modification or restructuring of a debt is considered a TDR if we, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, grant a concession to the borrower that we would not otherwise consider. Three factors must always be present: 

1. An existing credit must formally be renewed, extended, or modified, 

2. The borrower is experiencing financial difficulties, and 

3. We grant a concession that we would not otherwise consider.

The following is a schedule of our TDR’s including the number of loans represented.

Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 310-20-35-9 allows a loan to be removed from TDR status if the terms of the loan reflect current market rates and the loan has been performing under modified terms for an extended period of time or under certain other circumstances.

One TDR with a balance of $345,082 at December 31, 2016 paid off during the year ended December 31, 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2016, one TDR was paid off with a balance of $72,919 at December 31, 2015. During the year ended December 31, 2014 a loan receivable with a balance of $496,090, was removed from TDR status. The borrower consistently paid as agreed and made substantial reductions to principal. In addition, one loan receivable was paid off during the year ended December 31, 2014 with a balance of $106,194 at December 31, 2013. We do not know of any potential problem loans which will not meet their contractual obligations that are not otherwise discussed herein.

ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

The allowance for loan losses represents our estimate of probable losses inherent in our loan portfolio. The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses (the “allowance”) is reviewed by the Loan Committee and by the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis. For purposes of this analysis, adequacy is defined as a level sufficient to absorb estimated losses in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date presented. To remain consistent with GAAP, the methodology employed for this analysis has been modified over the years to reflect the economic environment and new accounting pronouncements. The credit department reviews this calculation on a quarterly basis. In addition, the Company’s Risk Management Officer validates the allowance calculation on a periodic basis. The methodology is based on a reserve model that is comprised of the three components listed below:

Loans greater than $50,000 are reviewed for impairment on a quarterly basis if any of the following criteria are met: 

Impairment is measured by the present value of the future cash flow discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. An impaired loan may not represent an expected loss.

A general reserve analysis is performed on all loans, excluding impaired loans. This analysis includes a pool of loans that are reviewed for impairment but are not found to be impaired. Historical losses are segregated into risk-similar groups and a loss ratio is determined for each group over a five-year period. The five-year average loss ratio by type is then used to calculate the estimated loss based on the current balance of each group.

Qualitative and environmental loss factors are also applied against the portfolio, excluding impaired loans. These factors include external risk factors that we believe are representative of our overall lending environment. We believe that the following factors create a more comprehensive loss projection, which we can use to monitor the quality of the loan portfolio.

The sum of each component’s analysis contributes to the “estimated loss” within our total portfolio.

Portfolio Risk 

Portfolio risk includes the levels and trends in delinquencies, impaired loans and changes in the loan rating matrix, trends in volume and terms of loans and overmargined real estate lending. We are satisfied with the stability of the past due and non-performing loans and believe there has been no decline in the quality of our loan portfolio due to any trend in delinquent or adversely classified loans. Sizable unsecured principal balances on a non-amortizing basis are monitored. Although the vast majority of our real estate loans are underwritten on a cash flow basis, the secondary source of repayment is typically tied to our ability to realize on the collateral. Accordingly, we closely monitor loan to value ratios. The maximum collateral advance rate is 80% on all real estate transactions, with the exception of raw land at 65% and land development at 70%.

Occasionally, we extend credit beyond our normal collateral advance margins in real estate lending. We refer to these loans as overmargined real estate loans. Although infrequent, the aggregate of these loans represent a notable part of our portfolio. Accordingly, these loans are monitored and the balances reported to the Board of Directors every quarter. An excessive level of this practice (as a percentage of capital) could result in additional regulatory scrutiny, competitive disadvantages and potential losses if forced to convert the collateral. The consideration of overmargined real estate loans directly relates to the capacity of the borrower to repay. We often request additional collateral to bring the loan to value ratio within the policy objectives and require a strong secondary source of repayment.

Although significantly under the threshold of 100% of capital (currently approximately $42.8 million), the number of overmargined real estate loans currently totals approximately $9,495,471 or approximately 3.51% of our loan portfolio at December 31, 2017 compared to $10,015,945 or approximately 3.84% of the loan portfolio at December 31, 2016.

A credit rating matrix is used to rate all extensions of credit and to provide a more specified picture of the risk each loan poses to the quality of the loan portfolio. There are eight possible ratings used to determine the quality of each loan based on the following characteristics: cash flow, collateral quality, guarantor strength, financial condition, management quality, operating performance, the relevancy of the financial statements, historical loan performance, debt coverage ratio, and the borrower’s leverage position. The matrix is designed to meet our standards and expectations of loan quality. One hundred percent of our loans are graded.

National and local economic trends and conditions  

National and local economic trends and conditions are constantly changing and both positively and negatively impact borrowers. Most macroeconomic conditions are not controllable by us and are incorporated into the qualitative risk factors. Natural and environmental disasters, political uncertainty, international instability, as well as problems in the traditional mortgage market are a few of the trends and conditions that are currently affecting the national and local economies. These changes have impacted borrowers’ ability, in many cases, to repay loans in a timely manner. On occasion, a loan’s primary source of repayment (i.e., personal income, cash flow, or lease income) may be eroded as a result of unemployment, lack of revenues, or the inability of a tenant to make rent payments.

Effects of changes in risk selection and underwriting practices  

The quality of our loan portfolio is contingent upon our risk selection and underwriting practices. All new loans (except for mortgage loans in the process of being sold to investors and loans secured by properly margined negotiable securities traded on an established market or other cash collateral) with exposure over $300,000 are reviewed by the Loan Committee on a monthly basis. The Board of Directors review credits over $750,000 monthly. Annual credit analyses are conducted on credits over $500,000 upon the receipt of updated financial information. Prior to any extension of credit, every significant commercial loan goes through sound credit underwriting. The Credit Department conducts a detailed cash flow on each proposal using the most current financial information.

Experience, ability and depth of lending management staff  

We have over 350 combined years of lending experience among our lending staff. In addition to the lending staff, we have an Advisory Board for each office, including the anticipated North Charleston branch, comprised of business and community leaders from the specific office market area. We meet with these advisory boards quarterly to discuss the trends and conditions in each respective market. We are aware of the many challenges currently facing the banking industry. As other banks look to increase earnings in the short term, we will continue to emphasize the need to maintain safe and sound lending practices and core deposit growth managed with a long-term perspective.

Industry conditions 

There continues be an influx of new banks and consolidation of existing banks in our geographic area, which creates pricing competition. We believe that our borrowing base is well established and therefore unsound price competition is not necessary.

Effects of changes in credit concentrations 

The risks associated with the effects of changes in credit concentration include loan concentration, geographic concentration and regulatory concentration. As of December 31, 2017, three Standard Industrial Code groups comprised more than 2% of our total outstanding loans. The groups are activities related to real estate, offices and clinics of doctors, and offices of lawyers. We are located along the coast and on an earthquake fault line, increasing the chances that a natural disaster may impact our borrowers and us. We have a Disaster Recovery Plan in place; however, the amount of time it would take for our customers to return to normal operations is unknown. Our plan is reviewed and tested annually.

Loan and credit administration risk 

Loan and credit administration risk includes collateral documentation, insurance risk and maintaining financial information risk.

The majority of our loan portfolio is collateralized with a variety of our borrowers’ assets. The execution and monitoring of the documentation to properly secure the loan is the responsibility of our lenders and Loan Department. We require insurance coverage naming us as the mortgagee or loss payee. Although insurance risk is also considered collateral documentation risk, the actual coverage, amounts of coverage and increased deductibles are important to management.

Risk includes a function of time during which the borrower’s financial condition may change; therefore, keeping financial information up to date is important to us. Our policy requires all new loans (with a credit exposure of $10,000 or more), regardless of the customer’s history with us, to have updated financial information. In addition, we monitor appraisals closely as real estate values are improving.

Based on our allowance for loan loss model, we recorded a provision for loan loss of $55,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017 primarily based on our analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, compared to $570,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016. At December 31, 2016, the five-year average loss ratios were: 0.110% Commercial, 0.00% Commercial Real Estate Construction, .073% Commercial Real Estate Other, 0.064% Consumer Real Estate, and .064% Consumer Other.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, charge-offs of $185,449 and recoveries of $154,230 were recorded to the allowance for loan losses, resulting in an allowance for loan losses of $3,875,398 or 1.43% of total loans, compared to charge-offs of $208,295 and recoveries of $72,085 resulting in an allowance for loan losses of $3,851,617 or 1.48% of total loans at December 31, 2016.

Net charge-offs for the year ended December 31, 2017, were $31,219 as compared to net charge-offs of $136,210 for the year ended December 31, 2016. We believe loss exposure in the portfolio is identified, reserved against, and closely monitored, to ensure that economic changes are promptly addressed in the analysis of reserve adequacy.

The accrual of interest is generally discontinued on loans which become 90 days past due as to principal or interest. The accrual of interest on some loans may continue even though they are 90 days past due if the loans are well secured or in the process of collection and we deem it appropriate. If non-accrual loans decrease their past due status to less than 30 days for a period of 6 to 9 months, they are reviewed individually to determine if they should be returned to accrual status. At December 31, 2017 there was one loan over 90 days past due still accruing interest compared to two loans over 90 days past due still accruing interest at December 31, 2016.  The loans at December 31, 2017 and 2016 were all considered impaired.

The following table represents a summary of loan loss experience for the past five years.

We believe the allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2017, is adequate to cover estimated losses in the loan portfolio; however, assessing the adequacy of the allowance is a process that requires considerable judgment. Our judgments are based on numerous assumptions about current events that we believe to be reasonable, but may or may not be valid. Thus, there can be no assurance that loan losses in future periods will not exceed the current allowance amount or that future increases in the allowance will not be required. No assurance can be given that our ongoing evaluation of the loan portfolio in light of changing economic conditions and other relevant circumstances will not require significant future additions to the allowance, thus adversely affecting our operating results.

The following table presents a breakdown of the allowance for loan losses for the past five years. 

The allowance is also subject to examination testing by regulatory agencies, which may consider such factors as the methodology used to determine adequacy and the size of the allowance relative to that of peer institutions, and other adequacy tests. In addition, such regulatory agencies could require us to adjust our allowance based on information available to them at the time of their examination.

The methodology used to determine the reserve for unfunded lending commitments, which is included in other liabilities, is inherently similar to the methodology used to determine the allowance for loan losses described above, adjusted for factors specific to binding commitments, including the probability of funding and historical loss ratio. No provision was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2017. A provision of $4,001 was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2016. The balance for the reserve for unfunded lending commitments was $24,826 as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED

Real estate acquired because of foreclosure or by deed-in-lieu of foreclosure is classified as other real estate owned (“OREO”) until it is sold. When the property is acquired, it is recorded at the lesser of the fair value of the property less estimated selling costs or the total loan balance. It is in our best interest to determine the fair market value by engaging an independent appraisal within 30 days of property being acquired into OREO. We cannot hold the property for a period of more than five years unless we have prior approval from the Commissioner of Banking of the State Board of Financial Institutions. The Bank will pay property taxes along with insurance expenses until the property is sold. OREO at December 31, 2017 consisted of one property in the amount of $435,479 compared to one property in the amount of $521,943 at December 31, 2016. One loan receivable valued at $98,832 transferred to OREO and subsequently sold during the year ended December 31, 2017 for a loss of $1,477. One property sold during the year ended December 31, 2016 for a loss of $13,450. One loan receivable valued at $35,473 moved to OREO during the year ended December 31, 2014, and ultimately sold at a gain of $2,382. We had no OREO during the year ended December 31, 2013.

NONPERFORMING ASSETS

Nonperforming assets include OREO, nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest. The following table summarizes nonperforming assets for the five years ended December 31, 2017:

DEPOSITS

The following table shows the contractual maturities of time deposits in denominations of $100,000 or more at December 31, 2017.