BANK OF THE JAMES FINANCIAL GROUP INC - Quarter Report: 2011 September (Form 10-Q)

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2011

BANK OF THE JAMES FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)


Virginia	000-50548	20-0500300
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(Commission file number)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

828 Main Street, Lynchburg, VA		24504
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(434) 846-2000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes ¨ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨ Yes x No

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: 3,324,319 shares of Common Stock, par value $2.14 per share, were outstanding at November 10, 2011.

Table of Contents


PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION			1

	Item 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements	1

	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	30

	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	46

	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	46

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION			46

	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	46

	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	46

	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	46

	Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	46

	Item 4.	[Removed and Reserved]	46

	Item 5.	Other Information	46

	Item 6.	Exhibits	48

SIGNATURES			49

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements

Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)


	(unaudited)		(audited)
	9/30/2011		12/31/2010
Assets

Cash and due from banks	$	17,429	$	11,665
Federal funds sold		8,741		7,094

Total cash and cash equivalents		26,170		18,759


Securities held-to-maturity (fair value of $8,529 in 2011 and $14,601 in 2010)		8,165		14,297
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value		45,153		38,586
Restricted stock, at cost		2,030		2,180
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $5,461 in 2011 and $5,467 in 2010		319,315		320,715
Premises and equipment, net		8,813		8,791
Software, net		131		89
Interest receivable		1,524		1,469
Cash value - bank owned life insurance		8,524		5,360
Other real estate owned		5,216		3,440
Income taxes receivable		464		304
Deferred tax asset		1,359		1,899
Other assets		2,576		3,039

Total assets	$	429,440	$	418,928


Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Deposits
Noninterest bearing demand	$	54,868	$	44,272
NOW, money market and savings		233,164		241,176
Time		87,515		82,942

Total deposits	$	375,547	$	368,390

Repurchase agreements		8,392		7,330

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements




FHLB borrowings		10,000			10,000
Capital notes		7,000			7,000
Interest payable		110			121
Other liabilities		1,032			592

Total liabilities	$	402,081		$	393,433


Stockholders’ equity
Common stock $2.14 par value; authorized 10,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 3,323,743 as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010		7,113			7,113
Additional paid-in-capital		22,742			22,742
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		354			(692	)
Retained (deficit)		(2,850	)		(3,668	)

Total stockholders’ equity	$	27,359		$	25,495


Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	429,440		$	418,928

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements

Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Income

(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) (unaudited)


	For the Three Months Ended September 30,				For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Interest and Dividend Income
Loans	$	4,355	$	4,969	$	13,212	$	14,815
Securities
US Government and agency obligations		239		281		681		1,046
Mortgage backed securities		94		54		357		57
Municipals		140		60		352		190
Dividends		3		2		29		25
Other (Corporates)		—		20		25		85
Federal Funds sold		5		6		18		15

Total interest and dividend income		4,836		5,392		14,674		16,233


Interest Expense
Deposits
NOW, money market savings		353		719		1,429		2,648
Time deposits		436		525		1,293		1,719
Federal Funds purchased		—		—		—		2

FHLB borrowings		75		75		223		249
Reverse repurchase agreements		21		30		55		95
Capital notes 6% due 4/1/2012		105		105		315		315

Total interest expense		990		1,454		3,315		5,028


Net interest income		3,846		3,938		11,359		11,205

Provision for loan losses		1,272		600		2,757		1,435


Net interest income after provision for loan losses		2,574		3,338		8,602		9,770


Other operating income
Mortgage fee income		250		460		779		1,073
Service charges, fees and commissions		320		300		875		1,031
Increase in cash value of life insurance		54		58		164		177
Other		10		38		46		65
Gain on sale or call of securities		566		98		766		320


Total other operating income		1,200		954		2,630		2,666

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements




Other operating expenses
Salaries and employee benefits		1,462		1,759		4,280		5,086
Occupancy		272		268		820		745
Equipment		263		296		780		829
Supplies		91		98		288		281
Professional, data processing, and other outside expense		557		401		1,526		1,182
Marketing		119		78		306		231

Credit expense		44		99		187		236
Loss on sale and/or writedown of OREO and other OREO expenses		452		18		667		54
FDIC insurance expense		145		290		515		675
Other		301		249		711		702

Total other operating expenses		3,706		3,556		10,080		10,021


Income before income taxes		68		736		1,152		2,415

Income tax expense		4		230		334		773


Net Income	$	64	$	506	$	818	$	1,642


Weighted average shares outstanding – basic		3,323,743		3,301,262		3,323,743		3,295,813


Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted		3,327,757		3,336,336		3,331,239		3,333,126


Income per common share – basic	$	0.02	$	0.15	$	0.25	$	0.50

Income per common share – diluted	$	0.02	$	0.15	$	0.25	$	0.49

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements

Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

(dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) (unaudited)


	September 30,
	2011			2010

Cash flows from operating activities
Net Income	$	818		$	1,642

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation		546			616
Net amortization and accretion of premiums and discounts on securities		529			363
(Gain) on sale of available-for-sale securities		(766	)		(310	)
(Gain) on call of held-to-maturity securities		—			(10	)
Loss on sale of assets		—			54
Provision for loan losses		2,757			1,435
Loss on sale of other real estate owned		184			—
Write down on other real estate owned		483			131
(Increase) in cash value of life insurance		(164	)		(177	)
Stock compensation expense		—			2
Provision for deferred income taxes		—			14
(Increase) decrease in interest receivable		(55	)		573
Decrease in other assets		374			515
(Increase) decrease in income taxes receivable		(160	)		139
(Decrease) in interest payable		(11	)		(66	)
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities		440			404


Net cash provided by operating activities	$	4,975		$	5,325


Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of securities held-to-maturity	$	(1,000	)	$	0
Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities held-to-maturity		7,000			1,000
Purchases of securities available-for-sale		(49,403	)		(31,545	)
Proceeds from maturities, calls and paydowns of securities available-for-sale		13,524			6,494
Proceeds from sale of securities available-for-sale		31,267			38,201
Purchases of bank owned life insurance		(3,000	)		—
Purchase of Federal Reserve Bank stock		—			(30	)
Sale of Federal Home Loan Bank stock		150			111

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements




Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned		1,346			0
Improvements to other real estate owned		(18	)		0
Origination of loans, net of principal collected		(5,072	)		(5,576	)
Recoveries of loans charged-off		33			284
Purchases of premises and equipment		(610	)		(241	)


Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities	$	(5,783	)	$	8,698


Cash flows from financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in deposits	$	7,157		$	(11,262	)
Net increase (decrease) in repurchase agreements		1,062			(3,398	)
Net (decrease) in Federal Home Loan Bank advances		—			(10,000	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		—			52


Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	$	8,219		$	(24,608	)


Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		7,411			(10,585	)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	$	18,759		$	31,305


Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	26,170		$	20,720


Non cash transactions
Transfer of loans to foreclosed assets	$	3,682		$	1,185
Fair value adjustment for securities		1,586			1,363


Cash transactions
Cash paid for interest	$	3,326		$	5,094
Cash paid for taxes		495			1,045

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements

Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income

(dollars in thousands) (unaudited)


	Total Shares Outstanding		Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital		Retained Earnings (Deficit)			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total

Balance at December 31, 2009		2,990,788	$	6,400	$	20,765	$	(2,938	)	$	(502	)	$	23,725


Net Income		—		—		—		1,820			—			1,820

Changes in unrealized gains on securities available for sale net of deferred taxes of $24		—		—		—		—			47			47

Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of income tax expense of $121		—		—		—		—			(237	)		(237	)


Total other comprehensive (loss)														(190	)


Comprehensive Income														1,630


10% Stock dividend		298,942		640		1,910		(2,550	)		—			—

Exercise of stock options		34,013		73		65		—			—			138

Stock compensation expense		—		—		2		—			—			2


Balance at December 31, 2010		3,323,743	$	7,113	$	22,742	$	(3,668	)	$	(692	)	$	25,495


Net Income		—		—		—		818			—			818

Changes in unrealized gains on securities available for sale net of deferred taxes of $800		—		—		—		—			1,552			1,552

Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of income tax expense of $260		—		—		—		—			(506	)		(506	)


Total other comprehensive income														1,046


Comprehensive Income														1,864


Balance at September 30, 2011		3,323,743	$	7,113	$	22,742	$	(2,850	)	$	354		$	27,359

See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation

The unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared by Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. (“Financial” or the “Company”) pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In management’s opinion the accompanying financial statements, which unless otherwise noted are unaudited, reflect all adjustments, consisting solely of normal recurring accruals, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial information as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Additional information concerning the organization and business of Financial, accounting policies followed, and other related information is contained in Financial’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes for the year ended December 31, 2010 included in Financial’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. Results for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2011.

Financial’s critical accounting policy relates to the evaluation of the allowance for loan losses which is based on management’s opinion of an amount that is adequate to absorb loss in the existing loan portfolio of Bank of the James (the “Bank”), Financial’s wholly-owned subsidiary. The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan loss based on available information including the composition of the loan portfolio, historical loan losses (to the extent available due to limited history), specific impaired loans, availability and quality of collateral, age of the various portfolios, changes in local economic conditions, and loan performance and quality of the portfolio. Different assumptions used in evaluating the adequacy of the Bank’s allowance for loan losses could result in material changes in Financial’s financial condition and results of operations. The Bank’s policies with respect to the methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses involve a higher degree of complexity and require management to make subjective judgments that often require assumptions or estimates about uncertain matters. These critical policies and their assumptions are periodically reviewed with the Board of Directors.

Note 2 – Use of Estimates

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Note 3 – Earnings Per Share

All earnings per share amounts have been adjusted to reflect the 10% stock dividend paid by Financial in July 2010, as well as all prior stock dividends.

Currently, only the option shares granted to certain officers and other employees of Financial pursuant to the Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan of 1999 Financial (the “1999 Plan”) are considered dilutive. The following is a summary of the earnings per share calculation for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010.


	Three months ended				Year to date
	September 30,				September 30,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Net income (loss)	$	64,000	$	506,000	$	818,000	$	1,642,000

Weighted average number of shares		3,323,743		3,301,262		3,323,743		3,295,813
Options effect of incremental shares		4,014		35,074		7,496		37,313


Weighted average diluted shares		3,327,757		3,336,336		3,331,239		3,333,126


Basic EPS (weighted avg shares)	$	0.02	$	0.15	$	0.25	$	0.50


Diluted EPS (Including Option Shares)	$	0.02	$	0.15	$	0.25	$	0.49

The following table sets forth the incremental shares associated with option shares that were not included in calculating the diluted earnings because their effect was anti-dilutive:

Three months ended

Year to date

September 30,

2011

2010

2011

2010

Incremental shares excluded from calculating diluted EPS because their effect was anti-dilutive

247,976

205,548

247,976

205,548

Note 4 – Stock Based Compensation

Accounting standards require companies to recognize the cost of employee services received in exchange for awards of equity instruments, such as stock options and restricted stock, based on the fair value of those awards at the date of grant.

Note 4 – Stock Based Compensation (continued)

Stock option plan activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 is summarized below:


	Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)		Average Intrinsic Value
Options outstanding, January 1, 2011		284,906		$	8.42
Exercised		—			—
Forfeited		(3,636	)	$	13.71

Options outstanding, September 30, 2011		281,270		$	8.35		2.69	$	—

Options exercisable, September 30, 2011		281,270		$	8.35		2.69	$	—

Intrinsic value is calculated by subtracting exercise price of option shares from the market price of underlying shares and multiplying that amount by the number of options outstanding. No intrinsic value exists where the exercise price is greater than the market price on a given date.

All compensation expense related to the foregoing stock option plan has been recognized. The Company’s ability to grant additional options shares under the 1999 Plan has expired.

Note 5 – Stock Dividend

On May 18, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Company declared a 10% stock dividend. The stock dividend was paid on July 23, 2010 to shareholders of record as of June 21, 2010. Following the stock dividend, the number of outstanding shares increased by approximately 299,000. The dividend required a reclassification of retained earnings effective May 18, 2010 in the amount of $2,550,000. Of this amount, $640,000 was reclassified as common stock and $1,910,000 was reclassified as additional paid-in-capital. The reclassification did not change total stockholders’ equity. All per share amounts have been retroactively adjusted to reflect this dividend. No other stock dividend and/or split has been declared since this time.

Note 6 – Fair Value Measurements

Determination of Fair Value

The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. In accordance with the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures topic of FASB ASC, the fair value of a financial instrument is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.

The recent fair value guidance provides a consistent definition of fair value, which focuses on exit price in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the

Note 6 – Fair Value Measurements (continued)

measurement date under current market conditions. If there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. In such instances, determining the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions depends on the facts and circumstances and requires the use of significant judgment. The fair value is a reasonable point within the range that is most representative of fair value under current market conditions.

Fair Value Hierarchy

In accordance with this guidance, the Company groups its financial assets and financial liabilities generally measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value.

•

Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

•

Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

•

Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy:

Securities available-for-sale

Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities would include highly liquid government bonds, mortgage products and exchange traded equities. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, or discounted cash flow. Level 2 securities would include U.S. agency securities, mortgage-backed agency securities, obligations of states and political subdivisions and certain corporate, asset backed and other securities. In certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to the valuation, securities are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. Currently, all of the Company’s securities are considered to be Level 2 securities.

Note 6 – Fair Value Measurements (continued)

The following table summarizes the Company’s financial assets that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the period (in thousands):

		$00,000		$00,000		$00,000		$00,000
			Carrying Value at September 30, 2011
Description	Balance as of September 30, 2011		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
US agency obligations	$	24,115	$	—	$	24,115	$	—
Mortgage-backed securities		8,841		—		8,841		—
Municipals		12,197		—		12,197		—


Total available-for-sale securities	$	45,153	$	—	$	45,153	$	—

		$00,000		$00,000		$00,000		$00,000
			Carrying Value at December 31, 2010
Description	Balance as of December 31, 2010		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
US agency obligations	$	14,341	$	—	$	14,341	$	—
Mortgage-backed securities		17,762		—		17,762		—
Municipals		5,465		—		5,465		—
Corporates		1,018		—		1,018		—


Total available-for-sale securities	$	38,586	$	—	$	38,586	$	—

Impaired loans

Loans are designated as impaired when, in the judgment of management based on current information and events, it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected. The measurement of loss associated with impaired loans can be based on either the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the collateral. Fair value is measured based on the value of the collateral securing the loans. Collateral may be in the form of real estate or business assets including equipment, inventory, and accounts receivable. The vast majority of the collateral is real estate. The value of real estate collateral is determined utilizing an income or market valuation approach based on an appraisal conducted by an independent, licensed appraiser outside of the Bank using observable market data (Level 2). However, if the collateral is a house or building in the process of construction or if an appraisal of the real estate property is over one year old, then the fair value is considered Level 3. The value of business equipment is based upon an outside appraisal if deemed significant, or the net book value on the applicable business’ financial statements if not considered significant using observable market data. Likewise, values for inventory and accounts receivables collateral are based on financial statement balances or aging reports (Level 3). Any fair value adjustments are recorded in the period incurred as provision for loan losses on the Statements of Income.

Note 6 – Fair Value Measurements (continued)

Other Real Estate Owned

Certain assets such as other real estate owned (OREO) are measured at fair value less cost to sell. We believe that the fair value component in its valuation follows the provisions of ASC 820.

Real estate acquired through foreclosure is transferred to OREO. The measurement of loss associated with OREO is based on the fair value of the collateral compared to the unpaid loan balance and anticipated costs to sell the property. The value of OREO collateral is determined utilizing an income or market valuation approach based on an appraisal conducted by an independent, licensed appraiser outside of the Bank using observable market data (Level 2). However, if the collateral is a house or building in the process of construction or if an appraisal of the real estate is over one year old, then the fair value is considered Level 3. Any fair value adjustments are recorded in the period incurred and expensed against current earnings.

The following table summarizes the Company’s impaired loans and OREO measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the period (in thousands).

		$00,000		$00,000		$00,000		$00,000
			Carrying Value at September 30, 2011
Description	Balance as of September 30, 2011		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Impaired loans	$	15,354	$	—	$	7,621	$	7,733

Other real estate owned	$	5,216	$	—	$	5,216	$	—


			Carrying Value at December 31, 2010
Description	Balance as of December 31, 2010		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Impaired loans	$	13,312	$	—	$	3,205	$	10,107

Other real estate owned	$	3,440	$	—	$	3,440	$	—

Financial Instruments

Cash, cash equivalents and Federal Funds sold

The carrying amounts of cash and short-term instruments approximate fair values.

Securities

Fair values of securities, excluding Federal Reserve Bank stock, Federal Home Loan Bank stock, and Community Bankers’ Bank stock are based on quoted market prices.

Loans

For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. Fair values for certain fixed rate loans are based on quoted market prices of

Note 6 – Fair Value Measurements (continued)

similar loans adjusted for differences in loan characteristics. Fair values for other loans such as commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. Fair values of nonperforming loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses or underlying collateral values, where applicable.

Bank Owned Life Insurance (BOLI)

The carrying amount approximates fair value.

Deposits

Fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., interest and noninterest checking, savings, and money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for fixed rate certificates of deposit are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.

FHLB borrowings

The fair value of FHLB borrowings is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on the rates currently offered for borrowings of similar remaining maturities and collateral requirements.

Short-term borrowings

The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased, borrowings under repurchase agreements, and other short-term borrowings maturing within ninety days approximate fair value.

Capital notes

Fair values of capital notes are based on market prices for debt securities having similar maturity and interest rate characteristics.

Accrued interest

The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair value.

Off-balance sheet credit-related instruments

Fair values for off-balance sheet, credit-related financial instruments are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing. Fair value of off-balance sheet credit-related instruments were deemed to be immaterial at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and therefore are not included in the table below.

Note 6 – Fair Value Measurements (continued)

The estimated fair values, and related carrying or notional amounts, of Financial’s financial instruments are as follows (in thousands):


	September 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Carrying Amounts		Approximate Fair Values		Carrying Amounts		Approximate Fair Values
Financial assets
Cash and due from banks	$	17,429	$	17,429	$	11,665	$	11,665
Federal funds sold		8,741		8,741		7,094		7,094
Securities
Available-for-sale		45,153		45,153		38,586		38,586
Held-to-maturity		8,165		8,529		14,297		14,601
Loans, net		319,315		324,871		320,715		323,120
Interest receivable		1,524		1,524		1,469		1,469
BOLI		8,524		8,524		5,360		5,360

Financial liabilities
Deposits	$	375,547	$	376,486	$	368,390	$	370,123
FHLB borrowings		10,000		9,733		10,000		10,518
Repurchase agreements		8,392		8,392		7,330		7,330
Capital notes		7,000		6,813		7,000		6,981
Interest payable		110		110		121		121

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Bank’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Bank’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment, and therefore, cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

Fair value estimates are based on existing on-balance-sheet and off-balance-sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. Significant assets that are not considered financial assets include deferred income taxes and bank premises and equipment; a significant liability that is not considered a financial liability is accrued post-retirement benefits. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in the estimates.

Financial assumes interest rate risk (the risk that general interest rate levels will change) as a result of its normal operations. As a result, the fair values of Financial’s financial instruments will change when interest rate levels change, and that change may be either favorable or unfavorable to the Bank. Management attempts to match maturities of assets and liabilities to the extent believed necessary to minimize interest rate risk. However, borrowers with fixed rate obligations are less likely to prepay in a rising rate environment and more likely to prepay in a falling rate environment. Conversely, depositors who are receiving fixed rates are more likely to withdraw funds before maturity in a rising rate environment and less likely to do so in a falling rate environment.

Note 6 – Fair Value Measurements (continued)

Management monitors rates and maturities of assets and liabilities and attempts to minimize interest rate risk by adjusting terms of new loans and deposits and by investing in securities with terms that mitigate the Bank’s overall interest rate risk.

Note 7 – Capital Notes

Financial has issued capital notes in the amount $7,000,000 (the “Notes”). The Notes bear interest at the rate of 6% per year with interest payable quarterly in arrears. The first quarterly interest payment on the Notes was paid on July 1, 2009. No principal payments are due until the Notes mature on April 1, 2012. On the maturity date, the principal and all accrued but unpaid interest on the Notes will be due and payable

Note 8 – Investments

The following tables summarize the Bank’s holdings for both securities held-to-maturity and securities available-for-sale as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (amounts in thousands):

		$(00,000)		$(00,000)		$(00,000)			$(00,000)
	September 30, 2011
	Amortized Costs		Gross Unrealized					Fair Value
	Amortized Costs		Gains		(Losses)			Fair Value
Held-to-Maturity
US agency obligations	$	8,165	$	364	$	—		$	8,529


Available-for-Sale
US agency obligations	$	23,849	$	271	$	(5	)	$	24,115
Mortgage-backed securities		8,758		97		(14	)		8,841
Municipals		12,009		381		(193	)		12,197

	$	44,616	$	749	$	(212	)	$	45,153

		$(00,000)		$(00,000)		$(00,000)			$(00,000)
	December 31, 2010
	Amortized Costs		Gross Unrealized					Fair Value
	Amortized Costs		Gains		(Losses)			Fair Value
Held-to-Maturity
US agency obligations	$	14,297	$	304	$	—		$	14,601


Available-for-Sale
US agency obligations	$	14,758	$	24	$	(441	)	$	14,341
Mortgage-backed securities		18,057		1		(296	)		17,762
Municipals		5,787		15		(337	)		5,465
Other		1,033		—		(15	)		1,018

	$	39,635	$	40	$	(1,089	)	$	38,586

Note 8 – Investments (continued)

The following tables show the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Bank’s investments with unrealized losses that are not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (amounts in thousands):

		$00,000		$00,000		$00,000		$00,000		$00,000		$00,000
	Less than 12 months				More than 12 months				Total
September 30, 2011	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Description of securities
U.S. agency obligations	$	1,021	$	5	$	—	$	—	$	1,021	$	5
Mortgage-backed securities		1,916		14		—		—		1,916		14
Municipals		4,877		193		—		—		4,877		193

Total	$	7,814	$	212	$	—	$	—	$	7,814	$	212

		$00,000		$00,000		$00,000		$00,000		$00,000		$00,000
	Less than 12 months				More than 12 months				Total
December 31, 2010	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Description of securities
U.S. agency obligations	$	11,808	$	441	$	—	$	—	$	11,808	$	441
Mortgage-backed securities		16,740		296		—		—		16,740		296
Municipals		3,178		303		590		34		3,768		337
Corporates		—		—		1,018		15		1,018		15

Total	$	31,726	$	1,040	$	1,608	$	49	$	33,334	$	1,089

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and may do so more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, (3) the intent of Financial, if any, to sell the security; (4) whether Financial more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovering its cost; and (5) whether Financial does not expect to recover the security’s entire amortized cost basis (even if Financial does not intend to sell the security).

At September 30, 2011, the Company did not consider the unrealized losses as other-than-temporary losses due to the nature of the securities involved. As of September 30, 2011, the Bank owned 9 securities that were being evaluated for other than temporary impairment. 6 of these securities were S&P rated AAA and 3 were S&P rated AA. As of September 30, 2011, 8 of these securities were obligations of government sponsored entities and 1 was a bank qualified municipal issue.

Based on the analysis performed by management as mandated by the Bank’s investment policy, management believes the default risk to be minimal. Because the Bank expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis, no declines currently are deemed to be other-than-temporary.

Note 9 – Loans, allowance for loan losses and OREO

Management has an established methodology used to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses that assesses the risks and losses inherent in the loan portfolio. For purposes of determining the allowance for loan losses, the Bank has segmented certain loans in the portfolio by product type. Within these segments, the Bank has sub-segmented its portfolio by classes within the segments, based on the associated risks within these classes. The classifications set forth below do not correspond directly to the

Note 9 – Loans and allowance for loan losses and OREO (continued)

classifications set forth in the call report (Form FFIEC 041). Management has determined that the classifications set forth below are more appropriate for use in identifying and managing risk in the loan portfolio.


Loan Segments:		Loan Classes:

Commercial		Commercial and industrial loans

Commercial real estate		Commercial mortgages – owner occupied
		Commercial mortgages – non-owner occupied
		Commercial construction

Consumer		Consumer unsecured
		Consumer secured

Residential		Residential mortgages
		Residential consumer construction

A summary of loans, net is as follows (dollars in thousands):


	As of:
	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010

Commercial	$	63,867	$	62,786
Commercial real estate		146,255		143,428
Consumer		69,799		68,289
Residential		44,855		51,679


Total loans		324,776		326,182

Less allowance for loan losses		5,461		5,467


Net loans	$	319,315	$	320,715

The Bank’s internal risk rating system is in place to grade commercial and commercial real estate loans. Category ratings are reviewed periodically by lenders and the credit review area of the Bank based on the borrower’s individual situation. Additionally, internal and external monitoring and review of credits are conducted on an annual basis.

Note 9 – Loans and allowance for loan losses and OREO (continued)

Below is a summary and definition of the Bank’s risk rating categories:


RATING 1		Excellent
RATING 2		Above Average
RATING 3		Satisfactory
RATING 4		Acceptable / Low Satisfactory
RATING 5		Monitor
RATING 6		Special Mention
RATING 7		Substandard
RATING 8		Doubtful
RATING 9		Loss

We segregate loans into the above categories based on the following criteria and we review the characteristics of each rating at least annually, generally during the first quarter. The characteristics of these ratings are as follows:

•

“Pass.” These are loans having risk ratings of 1 through 4. Pass loans are to persons or business entities with an acceptable financial condition, appropriate collateral margins, appropriate cash flow to service the existing loan, and an appropriate leverage ratio. The borrower has paid all obligations as agreed and it is expected that this type of payment history will continue. When necessary, acceptable personal guarantors support the loan.

•

“Monitor.” These are loans having a risk rating of 5. Monitor loans have currently acceptable risk but may have the potential for a specific defined weakness in the borrower’s operations and the borrower’s ability to generate positive cash flow on a sustained basis. The borrower’s recent payment history may currently or in the future be characterized by late payments. The Bank’s risk exposure is mitigated by collateral supporting the loan. The collateral is considered to be well-margined, well maintained, accessible and readily marketable.

•

“Special Mention.” These are loans having a risk rating of 6. Special Mention loans have weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the bank’s credit position at some future date. Special Mention loans are not adversely classified and do not expose an institution to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification. These loans do warrant more than routine monitoring due to a weakness caused by adverse events.

•

“Substandard.” These are loans having a risk rating of 7. Substandard loans are considered to have specific and well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize the viability of the Bank’s credit extension. The payment history for the loan has been inconsistent and the expected or projected primary repayment source may be inadequate to service the loan. The estimated net liquidation value of the collateral pledged and/or ability of the personal guarantor(s) to pay the loan may not adequately protect the Bank. There is a distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies associated with the loan are not corrected in the near term. A substandard loan would not automatically meet our definition of impaired unless the loan is significantly past due and the borrower’s performance and financial condition provides evidence that it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due.

•

“Doubtful.” These are loans having a risk rating of 8. Doubtful rated loans have all the weaknesses inherent in a loan that is classified substandard but with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. The possibility of loss is extremely high.

Note 9 – Loans and allowance for loan losses and OREO (continued)

Financing Receivables on Non-Accrual Status

(dollars in thousands)


	As of
	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Commercial	$	4,044	$	756
Commercial Real Estate:
Commercial Mortgages-Owner Occupied		2,269		1,157
Commercial Mortgages-Non-Owner Occupied		1,571		2,504
Commercial Construction		549		923
Consumer
Consumer Unsecured		—		83
Consumer Secured		1,062		1,153
Residential:
Residential Mortgages		1,384		1,725
Residential Consumer Construction		—		65


Totals	$	10,879	$	8,366

We also classify other real estate owned (OREO) as a nonperforming asset. OREO, which is accounted for in the “other assets” section of the Consolidated Balance Sheets, represents real property owned by the Bank either through purchase at foreclosure or received from the borrower through a deed in lieu of foreclosure. OREO increased to $5,216,000 on September 30, 2011 from $3,440,000 on December 31, 2010. The following table represents the changes in OREO balance during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

OREO Changes

(Dollars in Thousands)


	Nine months ended September 30, 2011
Balance at the beginning of the year (gross)	$	3,440
Transfers from loans		3,682
Transfer from premises and equipment		—
Capitalized costs		18
Charge-Offs		(394	)
Sales proceeds		(1,346	)
Gain (loss) on disposition		(184	)

Balance at the end of the period (gross)	$	5,216

Less valuation allowance		—
Balance at the end of the period (net)	$	5,216

Note 9 – Loans and allowance for loan losses and OREO (continued)


	Impaired Loans (dollars in thousands)
	For the Nine months Ended September 30, 2011
2011	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With No Related Allowance Recorded:
Commercial	$	5,341	$	5,557	$	—	$	9,970	$	194
Commercial Real Estate
Commercial Mortgages-Owner Occupied		2,112		2,686		—		2,408		69
Commercial Mortgage Non-Owner Occupied		2,189		2,201		—		4,072		87
Commercial Construction		1,577		1,577		—		1,221		41
Consumer
Consumer Unsecured		—		—		—		—		—
Consumer Secured		956		1,295		—		661		4
Residential
Residential Mortgages		625		906		—		514		10
Residential Consumer Construction		—		—		—		33		—

With An Allowance Recorded:
Commercial	$	3,243	$	3,313	$	564	$	2,307	$	84
Commercial Real Estate
Commercial Mortgages-Owner Occupied		3,780		3,963		526		4,447		157
Commercial Mortgage Non-Owner Occupied		4,758		4,810		513		2,942		145
Commercial Construction		582		594		132		1,895		10
Consumer
Consumer Unsecured		—		—		—		286		—
Consumer Secured		1,049		1,062		492		753		37
Residential
Residential Mortgages		2,189		2,454		244		1,981		77
Residential Consumer Construction		—		—		—		—		—

Totals:
Commercial	$	8,584	$	8,870	$	564	$	12,277	$	278
Commercial Real Estate
Commercial Mortgages-Owner Occupied		5,892		6,649		526		6,855		226
Commercial Mortgage Non-Owner Occupied		6,947		7,011		513		7,014		232
Commercial Construction		2,159		2,171		132		3,116		51
Consumer
Consumer Unsecured		—		—		—		286		—
Consumer Secured		2,005		2,357		492		1,414		41
Residential
Residential Mortgages		2,184		3,360		244		2,495		87
Residential Consumer Construction		—		—		—		33		—

	$	28,401	$	30,418	$	2,471	$	33,490	$	915

Note 9 – Loans and allowance for loan losses and OREO (continued)


	Impaired Loans (dollars in thousands)
	For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
2010	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With No Related Allowance Recorded:
Commercial	$	14,598	$	14,787	$	—	$	14,794	$	687
Commercial Real Estate
Commercial Mortgages-Owner Occupied		2,703		2,729		—		2,740		177
Commercial Mortgage Non-Owner Occupied		5,955		6,569		—		6,035		171
Commercial Construction		864		864		—		876		45
Consumer
Consumer Unsecured		—		—		—		—		—
Consumer Secured		366		660		—		371		13
Residential
Residential Mortgages		403		613		—		406		8
Residential Consumer Construction		65		68		—		66		1

With An Allowance Recorded:
Commercial	$	1,371	$	1,371	$	195	$	1,388	$	82
Commercial Real Estate
Commercial Mortgages-Owner Occupied		5,114		5,144		1,218		5,184		177
Commercial Mortgage Non-Owner Occupied		1,125		1,132		53		1,141		21
Commercial Construction		3,208		3,355		437		3,252		103
Consumer
Consumer Unsecured		572		589		75		578		15
Consumer Secured		456		456		195		461		25
Residential
Residential Mortgages		1,772		1,923		257		1,794		124
Residential Consumer Construction		—		—		—		—		—

Totals:
Commercial	$	15,969	$	16,158	$	195	$	16,182	$	769
Commercial Real Estate
Commercial Mortgages-Owner Occupied		7,817		7,873		1,218		7,924		354
Commercial Mortgage Non-Owner Occupied		7,080		7,701		53		7,176		192
Commercial Construction		4,072		4,219		437		4,128		148
Consumer
Consumer Unsecured		572		589		75		578		15
Consumer Secured		822		1,116		195		832		38
Residential
Residential Mortgages		2,175		2,536		257		2,200		132
Residential Consumer Construction		65		68		—		66		1

	$	38,572	$	40,260	$	2,430	$	39,086	$	1,649

Note 9 – Loans and allowance for loan losses and OREO (continued)


	Allowance for Credit Losses and Recorded Investment in Financing Receivables (dollars in thousands) For the Nine months Ended September 30, 2011
2011	Commercial			Commercial Real Estate			Consumer			Residential			Total

Allowance for Credit Losses:
Beginning Balance	$	473		$	2,897		$	1,207		$	890		$	5,467
Charge-offs		(498	)		(1,519	)		(541	)		(238	)		(2,796	)
Recoveries		8			—			23			2			33
Provision		1,068			1,158			383			148			2,757

Ending Balance		1,051			2,536			1,072			802			5,461

Ending Balance: Individually evaluated for impairment	$	564		$	1,171		$	492		$	244		$	2,471


Ending Balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment		487			1,367			578			558			2,990


Totals:	$	1,051		$	2,538		$	1,070		$	802		$	5,461


Financing Receivables:

Ending Balance: Individually evaluated for impairment		8,584			14,998			2,005			2,814			28,401


Ending Balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment		55,283			131,257			67,794			42,041			296,375


Totals:	$	63,867		$	146,255		$	69,799		$	44,855		$	324,776

Note 9 – Loans and allowance for loan losses and OREO (continued)


	Allowance for Credit Losses and Recorded Investment in Financing Receivables (dollars in thousands) For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
2010	Commercial		Commercial Real Estate		Consumer		Residential		Total

Allowance for Credit Losses:

Ending Balance: Individually evaluated for impairment	$	195	$	1,708	$	270	$	257	$	2,430


Ending Balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment		278		1,189		937		633		3,037


Totals:	$	473	$	2,897	$	1,207	$	890	$	5,467


Financing Receivables:

Ending Balance: Individually evaluated for impairment		15,969		18,969		1,394		2,240		38,572


Ending Balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment		46,817		124,459		66,895		49,439		287,610


Totals:	$	62,786	$	143,428	$	68,289	$	51,679	$	326,182


	Age Analysis of Past Due Financing Receivables as of September 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands)
2011	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Financing Receivables		Recorded Investment > 90 Days & Accruing
Commercial	$	333	$	—	$	4,043	$	4,376	$	59,491	$	63,867	$	—

Commercial Real Estate:
Commercial Mortgages-Owner Occupied		844		212		2,040		3,096		58,491		61,587		—
Commercial Mortgages-Non-Owner Occupied		2,408		—		1,571		3,979		70,234		74,213		—

Commercial Construction		—		—		549		549		9,906		10,455		—

Consumer:

Consumer Unsecured		4		10		—		14		3,073		3,087		—

Consumer Secured		143		120		1,052		1,315		65,397		66,712		—

Residential:

Residential Mortgages		605		—		1,246		1,851		40,399		42,250		—
Residential Consumer Construction		—		—		—		—		2,605		2,605		—

Total	$	4,337	$	342	$	10,501	$	11,866	$	309,596	$	324,776	$	—

Note 9 – Loans and allowance for loan losses and OREO (continued)


	Age Analysis of Past Due Financing Receivables as of December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands)
2010	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Financing Receivables		Recorded Investment > 90 Days & Accruing
Commercial	$	726	$	180	$	576	$	1,482	$	61,304	$	62,786	$	—

Commercial Real Estate:
Commercial Mortgages-Owner Occupied		1,390		299		553		2,242		62,120		64,362		—
Commercial Mortgages-Non-Owner Occupied		1,169		253		2,503		3,925		62,619		66,544		—

Commercial Construction		—		—		923		923		11,599		12,522		—

Consumer:

Consumer Unsecured		8		—		83		91		2,824		2,915		—

Consumer Secured		564		230		731		1,525		63,849		65,374		—

Residential:

Residential Mortgages		1,072		68		793		1,933		39,834		41,767		—
Residential Consumer Construction		—		—		65		65		9,847		9,912		—


Total	$	4,929	$	1,030	$	6,227	$	12,186	$	313,996	$	326,182	$	—


	Credit Quality Information - by Class September 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands)
	Pass		Monitor		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Totals
Commercial	$	51,267	$	3,220	$	3,085	$	6,131	$	164	$	63,867
Commercial Real Estate:
Commercial Mortgages-Owner Occupied		50,405		4,417		1,168		5,450		147		61,587
Commercial Mortgages-Non-Owner Occupied		61,673		3,849		1,744		6,947		—		74,213
Commercial Construction		8,190		106		—		2,159		—		10,455

Consumer
Consumer Unsecured		3,087		—		—		—		—		3,087
Consumer Secured		63,984		489		306		1,933		—		66,712
Residential:
Residential Mortgages		38,870		333		233		2,814		—		42,250
Residential Consumer Construction		2,605		—		—		—		—		2,605


Totals	$	280,081	$	12,414	$	6,536	$	25,434	$	311	$	324,776

Note 9 – Loans and allowance for loan losses and OREO (continued)


	Credit Quality Information - by Class December 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands)
	Pass		Monitor		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Totals
Commercial	$	41,328	$	2,732	$	9,471	$	9,075	$	180	$	62,786
Commercial Real Estate:
Commercial Mortgages-Owner Occupied		50,485		5,535		1,378		6,814		150		64,362
Commercial Mortgages-Non-Owner Occupied		52,004		2,337		6,354		5,849		—		66,544
Commercial Construction		7,571		855		1,446		2,650		—		12,522

Consumer
Consumer Unsecured		2,805		—		1		34		75		2,915
Consumer Secured		63,225		475		349		1,325		—		65,374
Residential:
Residential Mortgages		38,504		77		—		3,014		172		41,767
Residential Consumer Construction		9,475		—		372		65		—		9,912


Totals	$	265,397	$	12,011	$	19,371	$	28,826	$	577	$	326,182

Troubled Debt Restructurings


For the Nine months Ended September 30, 2011
(dollars in thousands)
Troubled Debt Restructurings	Number of Contracts	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post- Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment

Commercial Real Estate	5	$	3,345,376	$	3,345,376

The five contracts referenced above were modified in the form of interest rate reductions. After modification, each loan was individually reevaluated for impairment. As a result of the evaluation, it was determined that there was no additional impact to the allowance for loan loss.

There were no loan modifications during the three months ended September 30, 2011.


For the Nine months Ended September 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands)
Troubled Debt Restructurings That Subsequently Defaulted	Number of Contracts	Recorded Investment

Commercial	1	$	182,592
Consumer	1		29,999
Residential	2		482,097


Total	4	$	694,688

There were no Troubled Debt Restructurings that defaulted during the three months ended September 30, 2011.

Note 10 – Subsequent Events

In preparing these financial statements, Financial has evaluated events and transactions for potential recognition or disclosure through the date the financial statements were issued.

Note 11 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-06, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements.” ASU 2010-06 amends Subtopic 820-10 to clarify existing disclosures, require new disclosures, and includes conforming amendments to guidance on employers’ disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, “Receivables (Topic 310) – Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.” The new disclosure guidance significantly expands the existing requirements and will lead to greater transparency into an entity’s exposure to credit losses from lending arrangements. The extensive new disclosures of information as of the end of a reporting period became effective for both interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. Specific disclosures regarding activity that occurred before the issuance of the ASU, such as the allowance roll forward and modification disclosures, were required for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The Company has included the required disclosures in its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-28, “Intangible – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) – When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts.” The amendments in this ASU modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29, “Business Combinations (Topic 805) – Disclosure of Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations.” The guidance requires pro forma disclosure for business combinations that occurred in the current reporting period as though the acquisition date for all business combinations that occurred during the year had been as of the beginning of the annual reporting period. If comparative financial statements are presented, the pro forma information should be reported as though the acquisition date for all business combinations that occurred during the current year had been as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period. ASU 2010-29 is effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Final Rule No. 33-9002, “Interactive Data to Improve Financial Reporting.” The rule requires companies to submit financial statements in extensible business reporting language (XBRL) format with their SEC filings on a phased-in schedule. Large accelerated filers and foreign large accelerated filers using U.S. GAAP were required to provide interactive data reports starting with their first quarterly report for fiscal periods ending on or after June 15, 2010. All

Note 11 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)

remaining filers are required to provide interactive data reports starting with their first quarterly report for fiscal periods ending on or after June 15, 2011. The Company complied with this Rule beginning with the filing of the June 30, 2011 Form 10-Q.

In March 2011, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 114. This SAB revises or rescinds portions of the interpretive guidance included in the codification of the Staff Accounting Bulletin Series. This update is intended to make the relevant interpretive guidance consistent with current authoritative accounting guidance issued as a part of the FASB’s Codification. The principal changes involve revision or removal of accounting guidance references and other conforming changes to ensure consistency of referencing through the SAB Series. The effective date for SAB 114 is March 28, 2011. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02, “Receivables (Topic 310) – A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring.” The amendments in this ASU clarify the guidance on a creditor’s evaluation of whether it has granted a concession to a debtor. They also clarify the guidance on a creditor’s evaluation of whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulty. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. Retrospective application to the beginning of the annual period of adoption for modifications occurring on or after the beginning of the annual adoption period is required. As a result of applying these amendments, an entity may identify receivables that are newly considered to be impaired. For purposes of measuring impairment of those receivables, an entity should apply the amendments prospectively for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011. The Company has adopted ASU 2011-02 and included the required disclosures in its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-03, “Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860) – Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements.” The amendments in this ASU remove from the assessment of effective control (1) the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee and (2) the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The guidance should be applied prospectively to transactions or modifications of existing transactions that occur on or after the effective date. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2011-03 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) – Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.” This ASU is the result of joint efforts by the FASB and IASB to develop a single, converged fair value framework on how (not when) to measure fair value and what disclosures to provide about fair value measurements. The ASU is largely consistent with existing fair value measurement principles in U.S. GAAP (Topic 820), with many of the amendments made to eliminate unnecessary wording differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. The amendments are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 with prospective application. Early application is not permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2011-04 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220) – Presentation of Comprehensive Income.” The objective of this ASU is to improve the comparability, consistency and transparency of financial reporting and to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income by eliminating the option to present components of other comprehensive income

Note 11 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements (continued)

as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The amendments require that all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The single statement of comprehensive income should include the components of net income, a total for net income, the components of other comprehensive income, a total for other comprehensive income, and a total for comprehensive income. In the two-statement approach, the first statement should present total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that should present all the components of other comprehensive income, a total for other comprehensive income, and a total for comprehensive income. The amendments do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income, the option for an entity to present components of other comprehensive income either net of related tax effects or before related tax effects, or the calculation or reporting of earnings per share. The amendments in this ASU should be applied retrospectively. The amendments are effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted because compliance with the amendments is already permitted. The amendments do not require transition disclosures. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2011-05 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2011, the SEC issued Final Rule No. 33-9250, “Technical Amendments to Commission Rules and Forms related to the FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification.” The SEC has adopted technical amendments to various rules and forms under the Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the Investment Company Act of 1940. These revisions were necessary to conform those rules and forms to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The technical amendments include revision of certain rules in Regulation S-X, certain items in Regulation S-K, and various rules and forms prescribed under the Securities Act, Exchange Act and Investment Company Act. The Release was effective as of August 12, 2011. The adoption of the release did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, “Intangible – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) – Testing Goodwill for Impairment.” The amendments in this ASU permit an entity to first assess qualitative factors related to goodwill to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill test described in Topic 350. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50 percent. Under the amendments in this ASU, an entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted, including for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed as of a date before September 15, 2011, if an entity’s financial statements for the most recent annual or interim period have not yet been issued. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2011-08 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report contains statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “plan” and similar expressions and variations thereof identify certain of such forward-looking statements which speak only as of the dates on which they were made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Readers are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, and that actual results may differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: economic conditions (both generally and more specifically in the markets in which we operate); competition for our customers from other providers of financial services; government legislation and regulation relating to the banking industry (which changes from time to time and over which we have no control) including but not limited to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act; changes in the value of real estate securing loans made by the Bank; changes in interest rates; and material unforeseen changes in the liquidity, results of operations, or financial condition of our customers. Other risks, uncertainties and factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements we make.

GENERAL

Critical Accounting Policies

Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.’s (“Financial”) financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). The financial information contained within our statements is, to a significant extent, based on measures of the financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. A variety of factors could affect the ultimate value that is obtained either when earning income, recognizing an expense, recovering an asset or relieving a liability. We use historical loss ratios as one factor in determining the inherent loss that may be present in our loan portfolio. Actual losses could differ significantly from the historical factors that we use in estimating risk. In addition, GAAP itself may change from one previously acceptable method to another method. Although the economics of our transactions would be the same, the timing of events that would impact our transactions could change.

The allowance for loan losses is management’s estimate of the losses that may be sustained in our loan portfolio. The allowance is based on two basic principles of accounting: (i) ASC 450 “Contingencies”, which requires that losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and are reasonably estimable and (ii) ASC 310 “Impairment of a Loan”, which requires that losses on impaired loans be accrued based on the differences between the value of collateral, present value of future cash flows or values that are observable in the secondary market and the loan balance. Guidelines for determining allowances for loan losses are also provided in the SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 102 – “Selected Loan Loss Allowance Methodology and Documentation Issues” and the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council’s interagency guidance, “Interagency Policy Statement on the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses” (the “FFIEC Policy Statement”). See “Management Discussion and Analysis Results of Operations – Allowance for Loan Losses and Loan Loss Reserve” below for further discussion of the allowance for loan losses.

Overview

Financial is a bank holding company headquartered in Lynchburg, Virginia. Our primary business is retail banking which we conduct through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Bank of the James (which we refer to as the “Bank”). We conduct three other business activities, mortgage banking through the Bank’s Mortgage division (which we refer to as “Mortgage”), investment services through the Bank’s Investment division (which we refer to as “Investment”), and insurance activities through BOTJ Insurance, Inc., a subsidiary of the Bank, (which we refer to as “Insurance”).

Financial declared a 10% stock dividend on May 18, 2010 which was paid on July 23, 2010 to shareholders of record on June 21, 2010.

The Bank is a Virginia banking corporation headquartered in Lynchburg, Virginia. The Bank was incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia as a state chartered bank in 1998 and began banking operations in July 1999. The Bank was organized to engage in general retail and commercial banking business. The Bank is a community-oriented financial institution that provides varied banking services to individuals, small and medium-sized businesses, and professional concerns in the Central Virginia, Region 2000 area, which encompasses the seven jurisdictions of the Town of Altavista, Amherst County, Appomattox County, the City of Bedford, Bedford County, Campbell County, and the City of Lynchburg. The Bank strives to provide its customers with products comparable to statewide regional banks located in its market area, while maintaining the prompt response time and level of service of a community bank. Management believes this operating strategy has particular appeal in the Bank’s market area.

The Bank’s principal office is located at 828 Main Street, Lynchburg, Virginia 24504 and its telephone number is (434) 846-2000. The Bank also maintains a website at www.bankofthejames.com.

Our operating results depend primarily upon the Bank’s net interest income, which is determined by the difference between (i) interest and dividend income on earning assets, which consist primarily of loans, investment securities and other investments, and (ii) interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, which consist principally of deposits and other borrowings. The Bank’s net income also is affected by its provision for loan losses, as well as the level of its non-interest income, including loan fees and service charges, and its non-interest expenses, including salaries and employee benefits, occupancy expense, data processing expenses, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation premiums, expense in complying with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, miscellaneous other expenses, franchise taxes, and income taxes.

The Bank intends to enhance its profitability by increasing its market share in the Region 2000 area, providing additional services to its customers, and controlling costs.

The Bank now services its banking customers through the following nine full service branch locations in the Region 2000 area.

•

The main office located at 828 Main Street in Lynchburg (opened October 2004) (the “Main Street Office”),

•

A branch located at 615 Church Street in Lynchburg (opened July 1999) (the “Church Street Branch”),

•

A branch located at 5204 Fort Avenue in Lynchburg (opened November 2000) (the “Fort Avenue Branch”),

•

A branch located on South Amherst Highway in Amherst County (opened June 2002) (the “Madison Heights Branch”),

•

A branch located at 17000 Forest Road in Forest (opened February 2005) (the “Forest Branch”),

•

A branch located at 4935 Boonsboro Road, Suites C and D in Lynchburg (opened April 2006) (the “Boonsboro Branch”),

•

A branch located at 164 South Main Street, Amherst, Virginia (opened January 2007) (the “Amherst Branch”),

•

A branch located at 1405 Ole Dominion Boulevard in the City of Bedford, Virginia, located off of Independence Boulevard (opened October 2008) (the “Bedford Branch”), and

•

A branch located at 1110 Main Street, Altavista, Virginia (relolcated from temporary branch in June 2009) (the “Altavista Branch”).

The Bank also has opened a limited-service branch located in the Westminster-Canterbury facilities located at 501 VES Road, Lynchburg, Virginia 24503.

In addition, the Bank, through its Mortgage division, originates residential mortgage loans through two offices—one located at the Forest Branch and the other located at 1152 Hendricks Store Road, Moneta, Virginia.

The Investment division operates primarily out of its office located at the Church Street Branch.

The Bank continuously evaluates areas located within Region 2000 to identify additional viable branch locations. Based on this ongoing evaluation, the Bank may acquire one or more additional suitable sites.

Subject to regulatory approval, the Bank anticipates opening additional branches during the next two fiscal years. Although numerous factors could influence the Bank’s expansion plans, the following discussion provides a general overview of the additional branch location that the Bank currently is considering.

Timberlake Road Area, Campbell County (Lynchburg), Virginia. As previously disclosed, the Bank has purchased certain real property located at the intersection of Turnpike and Timberlake Roads, Campbell County, Virginia. The Bank does not anticipate opening a branch at this location prior to 2012. The Bank has determined that the existing structure is not suitable for use as a bank branch.

Rustburg, Virginia. In March, 2011 the Bank purchased certain real property near the intersection of Routes 501 and 24 in Rustburg, Virginia. The structure on the property is being demolished and removed. The Bank does not anticipate opening a branch at this location prior to the first quarter of 2013. The Bank has installed an ATM in a local municipal building in order to establish a presence in this market until the branch has been established.

The Bank estimates that the cost of improvements, furniture, fixtures, and equipment necessary to upfit the property will be between $900,000 and $1,500,000 per location.

Although the Bank cannot predict with certainty the financial impact of each new branch, management generally anticipates that each new branch will become profitable within 12 to 18 months of operation.

Subject to terms acceptable to the Bank, the Bank may consider entering into sale-leaseback arrangements for one or more of its branches.

Except as set forth herein, the Bank does not expect to purchase any significant property or equipment in the upcoming 12 months. Future branch openings are subject to regulatory approval.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

The Bank is a party to various financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Such commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheets and could impact the overall liquidity and capital resources to the extent customers accept and/or use these commitments.

The Bank’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. A summary of the Bank’s commitments is as follows:


	September 30, 2011 (in thousands)
Commitments to extend credit	$	47,859
Letters of Credit		914

Total	$	48,773

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Because many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Bank upon extension of credit, is based on the Bank’s credit evaluation of the customer.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those letters of credit are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. Collateral is required in instances that the Bank deems necessary.

SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion represents management’s discussion and analysis of the financial condition of Financial as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and the results of operations of Financial for the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included elsewhere herein and should be read in the context of the length of time for which the Bank has been operating.

All financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Financial Condition Summary

September 30, 2011 as Compared to December 31, 2010

Total assets were $429,440,000 on September 30, 2011 compared with $418,928,000 at December 31, 2010, an increase of 2.51%. The increase in total assets is due primarily to an increase in Federal funds sold and securities available-for-sale resulting from an increase in deposits, as explained in the following paragraph.

Total deposits increased from $368,390,000 as of December 31, 2010 to $375,547,000 on September 30, 2011, an increase of 1.94%. This increase occurred because of the Bank’s increased efforts to obtain lower cost demand deposits and the Bank’s increased presence in the market.

Total loans decreased to $324,776,000 on September 30, 2011 from $326,182,000 on December 31, 2010. Loans, net of unearned income and allowance, decreased to $319,315,000 on September 30, 2011 from $320,715,000 on December 31, 2010, a decrease of 0.44%. The following summarizes the position of the Bank’s loan portfolio as of the dates indicated by dollar amount and percentages (dollar amounts in thousands):


	September 30, 2011					December 31, 2010
	Amount		Percentage			Amount		Percentage
Commercial	$	63,867		19.67	%	$	62,786		19.25	%
Commercial Real Estate		146,255		45.02	%		143,428		43.97	%
Consumer		69,799		21.50	%		68,289		20.94	%
Residential		44,855		13.81	%		51,679		15.84	%


Total loans	$	324,776		100.00	%	$	326,182		100.00	%

Total nonperforming assets, which consist of non-accrual loans and other real estate owned (“OREO”) increased to $16,005,000 on September 30, 2011 from $11,806,000 on December 31, 2010. This increase was primarily due to an increase in non-accrual (or nonperforming) loans. Non-accrual loans increased 28.97% to $10,789,000 on September 30, 2011 from $8,366,000 on December 31, 2010. The increase largely resulted from the reclassification in the quarter ended June 30, 2011 of two relationships related to real estate development. As discussed in more detail below under “Results of Operations—Allowance for Loan Losses”, management has provided for the anticipated losses on these loans in the loan loss reserve. If interest on non-accrual loans had been accrued, such interest on a cumulative basis would have approximated $1,356,000 and $1,059,000, as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. Loan payments received on non-accrual loans are first applied to principal. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status there are several negative implications. First, all interest accrued but unpaid at the time of the classification is reversed and deducted from the interest income totals for the Bank. Second, accruals of interest are discontinued until it becomes certain that both principal and interest can be repaid. Third, there may be actual losses that necessitate additional provisions for credit losses charged against earnings. These loans were included in the non-performing loan totals listed above.

OREO represents real property owned by the Bank acquired either through purchase at foreclosure or received from the borrower through a deed in lieu of foreclosure. On December 31, 2010, the Bank was carrying 15 OREO properties on its books at a value of $3,440,000. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, the Bank acquired 24 additional OREO properties and disposed of 17 OREO properties, and as of September 30, 2011 the Bank is carrying 22 OREO properties at a value of $5,216,000. The OREO properties are available for sale and are being actively marketed on the Bank’s website and through other means.

The Bank had loans in the amount of $3,345,000 at September 30, 2011 classified as performing Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”) as compared to $4,987,000 at December 31, 2010. None of these TDRs were included in non-accrual loans. These loans have had their original terms modified to facilitate payment by the borrower. The loans have been classified as TDRs primarily due to a change to interest only payments and the maturity of these modified loans is primarily less than one year.

Cash and cash equivalents increased to $26,170,000 on September 30, 2011 from $18,759,000 on December 31, 2010. Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash due from correspondents, cash in vault, and overnight investments (including federal funds sold). This increase is due primarily to an increase in cash and due from banks from $11,665,000 at December 31, 2010 to $17,429,000 at September 30, 2011. Cash and cash equivalents can vary due to routine fluctuations in deposits, including fluctuations in transactional accounts and professional settlement accounts, both of which are subject to fluctuations.

Because of the call of five bonds, securities held-to-maturity decreased to $8,165,000 on September 30, 2011 from $14,297,000 on December 31, 2010. Securities available-for-sale increased to $45,153,000 on September 30, 2011, from $38,586,000 December 31, 2010. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 the Bank received $13,524,000 in proceeds from maturities and/or calls of securities available-for-sale and $31,267,000 in proceeds from the sale of securities available-for-sale. The Bank purchased $49,403,000 in securities available-for sale during the same period. The increase from December 31, 2010 in securities available-for-sale was primarily due to the investment of funds received from an increase in deposit accounts and the reinvestment of proceeds from called securities held-to-maturity.

Financial’s investment in Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (FHLBA) stock totaled $1,222,000 at September 30, 2011 and $1,372,000 at December 31, 2010, a decrease of $150,000 or10.94%. FHLBA stock is generally viewed as a long-term investment and because there is no market for the stock other than other Federal Home Loan Banks or member institutions, FHLBA stock is viewed as a restricted security. Therefore, when evaluating FHLBA stock for impairment, its value is based on the ultimate recoverability of the par value rather than by recognizing temporary declines in value. The FHLBA has resumed the repurchase of limited amounts of Subclass B1 and B2 stock after temporarily suspending this activity during the financial crisis of 2008-2009.

Liquidity and Capital

At September 30, 2011, Financial had liquid assets of approximately $71,323,000 in the form of cash, interest-bearing and noninterest-bearing deposits with banks, federal funds sold and available-for-sale investments. Management believes that liquid assets were adequate at September 30, 2011. Management anticipates that additional liquidity will be provided by the growth in deposit accounts and loan repayments at the Bank. In addition, the Bank has the ability to purchase federal funds on the open market and borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank’s discount window, if necessary.

In connection with a private placement of unregistered debt securities, Financial issued capital notes in the amount $7,000,000 (the “Notes”) in 2009. The Notes bear interest at the rate of 6% per year with interest payable quarterly in arrears. No principal payments are due until the Notes mature on April 1, 2012, the date on which the Notes mature and the principal and all accrued but unpaid interest on the Notes will be due and payable. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, Financial made interest payments on the Notes totaling $105,000 and $315,000, respectively.

Management is not aware of any trends, events or uncertainties that are reasonably likely to have a material negative impact on Financial’s short-term or long-term liquidity.

At September 30, 2011, the Bank had a leverage ratio of 7.75%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 10.55% and a total risk-based capital ratio of 11.80%. As of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 the Bank’s regulatory capital levels exceeded those established for well-capitalized institutions. The following table sets forth the minimum capital requirements and the Bank’s capital position as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

Bank Level Only Capital Ratios


Analysis of Capital (in 000’s)	September 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Tier 1 Capital:
Common stock	$	3,743	$	3,742
Surplus		19,325		19,325
Retained earnings		10,284		9,049

Total Tier 1 capital	$	33,352	$	32,116


Tier 2 Capital:
Allowance for loan losses	$	3,971	$	3,989


Total Tier 2 Capital:	$	3,971	$	3,989

Total risk-based capital	$	37,323	$	36,105


Risk weighted assets	$	316,227	$	317,606

Average total assets	$	430,377	$	423,349


	Actual						Regulatory Benchmarks
	September 30, 2011			December 31, 2010			For Capital Adequacy Purposes			For Well Capitalized Purposes
Capital Ratios:
Tier 1 capital to average total assets ratio (leverage ratio)		7.75	%		7.59	%		4.00	%		5.00	%
Tier 1 risk based capital ratio		10.55	%		10.11	%		4.00	%		6.00	%
Total risk-based capital ratio		11.80	%		11.37	%		8.00	%		10.00	%

The above tables set forth the capital position and analysis for the Bank only. Because total assets on a consolidated basis are less than $500,000,000, Financial is not subject to the consolidated capital requirements imposed by the Bank Holding Company Act. Consequently, Financial does not calculate its financial ratios on a consolidated basis. If calculated, the capital ratios for the Company on a consolidated basis would no longer be comparable to the capital ratios of the Bank because the proceeds from the private placement of the 6% capital notes due on April 1, 2012 do not qualify as equity capital on a consolidated basis.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the Three and nine months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

Earnings Summary

Financial had net income of $64,000 and $818,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to $506,000 and $1,642,000 for the comparable periods in 2010. The basic and diluted earnings per common share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 were $0.02 and $0.25, compared to basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.15 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.50 and $0.49, respectively for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. All earnings per share amounts have been adjusted to reflect the 10% stock dividend paid by Financial in July 2010 and all prior stock dividends.

The decrease in net income was due in large part to the increased provision to the allowance for loan loss reserve as discussed in more detail below (See “Allowance for Loan Losses”).

These operating results represent an annualized return on stockholders’ equity of 0.94% and 4.12% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, compared with 7.91% and 8.87% for the same periods in 2010. The Company had an annualized return on average assets for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 of 0.06% and 0.26%, compared with 0.49% and 0.53% for three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Interest Income, Interest Expense, and Net Interest Income

Interest income decreased to $4,836,000 and $14,674,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 from $5,392,000 and $16,233,000 for the same periods in 2010, a decrease of 10.31% and 9.60%, respectively. Interest income decreased primarily because the rate on total average earning assets decreased from 5.62% and 5.66% for the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 to 4.84% and 4.97% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011. The rate on total average earning assets decreased in part because the Bank invested a greater percentage of its earning assets in investment securities and federal funds rather than loans and because the average yield on loans decreased both quarterly and year to date. Although management cannot be certain, management expects that interest rates will remain near historic lows for the remainder of 2011 and may negatively impact our interest income.

Interest expense decreased to $990,000 and $3,315,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 from $1,454,000 and $5,028,000 for the same periods in 2010, a decrease of 31.91% and 34.07%, respectively. This significant decrease in interest expense resulted in large part from a decrease in the rate paid on balances on deposits. The Bank’s average rate paid on deposits was 1.57% and 1.84% during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 as compared to 0.96% and 1.12% for the same periods in 2011. This resulted from management’s efforts to minimize the Bank’s interest expense and maximize its net interest margin.

The fundamental source of the Bank’s revenue is net interest income, which is determined by the difference between (i) interest and dividend income on interest earning assets, which consist primarily of loans, investment securities and other investments, and (ii) interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, which consist principally of deposits and other borrowings. Net interest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 was $3,846,000 and $11,359,000 compared with $3,938,000 and $11,205,000 for the same periods in 2010. The decrease in net interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2011 as compared with the comparable three month period in 2010 was due to interest earning assets repricing downward faster than interest bearing liabilities. During the first quarter of 2011, the opposite occurred and interest bearing liabilities priced downward faster than interest earning assets, which resulted in an increase in net interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010. The net interest margin was 3.84% and 3.85% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, down from 3.91% and 4.10% in the same periods a year ago.

Financial’s net interest margin analysis and average balance sheets are shown in Schedule I on page 42.

Non-Interest Income

Non-interest income is comprised primarily of fees and charges on transactional deposit accounts, mortgage loan origination fees, commissions on sales of investments and the Bank’s ownership interest in a title insurance agency. Non-interest income exclusive of gains on sales of securities decreased to $634,000 and $1,864,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 from $856,000 and $2,346,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010. This decrease for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the same periods last year was due primarily to a decrease in service charges and fees on deposit accounts and a decrease in mortgage fee income. Gains on sales of securities increased to $566,000 and $766,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 as compared to $98,000 and $320,000 for the comparable periods in 2010.

The Bank, through the Mortgage division, originates both conforming and non-conforming consumer residential mortgage loans in the Region 2000 area. As part of the Bank’s overall risk management strategy, all of the loans originated and closed by the Mortgage division are presold to major national mortgage banking or financial institutions. The Mortgage division assumes no credit or interest rate risk on these mortgages.

Management anticipates that residential mortgage rates will remain near the current historic lows for the remainder of 2011. Management expects that low rates coupled with the Mortgage division’s reputation in Region 2000 will allow us to continue to grow revenue at the Mortgage division. Revenue from mortgage origination fees decreased in the three month period ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the same period for 2010. Management believes that regulatory pressure may result in a decreased number of competitors to the Mortgage division and this could result in an increase in market share.

Our Investment division provides brokerage services through an agreement with a third-party broker-dealer. Pursuant to this arrangement, the third party broker-dealer operates a service center adjacent to one of the branches of the Bank. The center is staffed by dual employees of the Bank and the broker-dealer. Investment receives commissions on transactions generated and in some cases ongoing management fees such as mutual fund 12b-1 fees. The Investment division’s financial impact on our consolidated revenue has been immaterial. Although management cannot predict the financial impact of Investment with certainty, management anticipates the Investment division’s impact on noninterest income will remain immaterial in 2011.

In the third quarter of 2008, we began providing insurance and annuity products to Bank customers and others, through the Bank’s Insurance subsidiary. The Bank has one full-time and one part-time employee that are dedicated to selling insurance products through Insurance. Insurance generates minimal revenue and its financial impact on our consolidated revenue has been immaterial. Management anticipates that Insurance’s impact on noninterest income will remain immaterial in 2011.

Non-Interest Expense

Non-interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 increased to $3,706,000 and $10,080,000, or 4.22% and 0.59%, respectively, from $3,556,000 and $10,021,000 for the comparable periods in 2010. This slight increase in non-interest expense from the comparable period in 2010 can be attributed to increased occupancy and outside expenses, the loss on sale of OREO and OREO related expenses, and a one-time expense related to the settlement of an investigation by the Division of

Securities and Retail Franchising of the Virginia State Corporation Commission as discussed under “Other Information” below. The increased non-interest expenses were offset in part by a decrease in compensation expense, which resulted primarily from a decrease in commission expense as well as the Bank’s decision to restructure certain departments and the resulting reduced staffing.

Total personnel expense was $1,462,000 and $4,280,000 for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2011 as compared to $1,759,000 and $5,086,000 for the same periods in 2010. Compensation for some employees of the Mortgage division and the Investment division is commission-based and therefore subject to fluctuation.

During the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the FDIC premium expense decreased to $145,000 and $515,000 from $290,000 and $675,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010. FDIC assessment payments have decreased primarily because the FDIC changed the asset base on which the assessments are calculated.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The provision to the allowance for loan losses is charged to earnings to bring the total allowance to a level deemed appropriate by management and is based upon many factors, including calculations of specific impairment of certain loans, general economic conditions, actual and expected credit losses, loan performance measures, historical trends and specific conditions of the individual borrower. Based on the application of the loan loss calculation, the Bank provided $1,272,000 and $2,757,000 to the allowance for loan loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 compared to provisions of $600,000 and $1,435,000 for the comparable periods in 2010.

The increase in the loan loss provision for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the same quarter in 2010 was due to the following factors:

•

The quality of certain assets, primarily commercial development loans and residential speculative housing construction loans, were impacted by a decline in the value of the collateral supporting the loans. Management’s evaluation of these asset classes resulted in the increased provision in the quarter ended September 30, 2011.

•

In light of the current economic environment, management continues its ongoing assessment of specific impairment in the Bank’s loan portfolio. The analysis resulted in a increase in the provision for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 as compared to the same quarter in 2010.

Management believes that the current allowance for loan loss of $5,461,000 (or 1.68% of total loans) at September 30, 2011, as compared to $5,467,000 (or 1.68% of total loans) as of December 31, 2010 remains adequate.

The following sets forth the reconciliation of the allowance for loan loss:


	Three months ended September 30, (in thousands)						Nine months ended September 30, (in thousands)
	2011			2010			2011			2010

Balance, beginning of period	$	4,970		$	4,708		$	5,467		$	4,288
Provision for loan losses		1,272			600			2,757			1,435
Loans charged off		(791	)		(363	)		(2,796	)		(1,052	)
Recoveries of loans charged off		10			10			33			284

Net Charge Offs		(781	)		(353	)		(2,763	)		(768	)

Balance, end of period	$	5,461		$	4,955		$	5,461		$	4,955

The slight decrease in the balance in the allowance for loan loss reserve as of September 30, 2011 as compared to December 31, 2010 resulted from the charge-offs of loans with specific reserves that occurred in the first nine months of 2011.

Net charge offs increased from $353,000 and $768,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 to $781,000 and $2,763,000 for the same periods in 2011. Charged off loans, which are loans that management deems uncollectible, are written against the loan loss reserve and constitute a realized loss. While a charged off loan may subsequently be collected, such recoveries generally are realized over an extended period of time. The increase in net charge offs resulted primarily from two commercial relationships that the Bank determined were uncollectible.

Income Taxes

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, Financial had an income tax expense of $4,000 and $334,000 respectively.

Legislation

On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Reform Act”) was signed into law. The Dodd-Frank Reform Act represents a significant overhaul of many aspects of the regulation of the financial services industry, although many of its provisions (e.g., the interchange and trust preferred capital limitations) apply to companies that are significantly larger than Financial. The Dodd-Frank Reform Act directs applicable regulatory authorities to promulgate regulations implementing its provisions, and its effect on Financial and on the financial services industry as a whole will be clarified as those regulations are issued. Major elements of the Dodd-Frank Reform Act include:

•

A permanent increase in deposit insurance coverage to $250,000 per account, permanent unlimited deposit insurance on noninterest-bearing transaction accounts, and an increase in the minimum Deposit Insurance Fund reserve requirement for banks having consolidated assets in excess of $10 billion from 1.15% to 1.35%, with assessments to be based on assets as opposed to deposits.

•

New disclosure and other requirements relating to executive compensation and corporate governance.

•

Amendments to the Truth in Lending Act aimed at improving consumer protections with respect to mortgage originations, including originator compensation, minimum repayment standards, and prepayment considerations.

•

The establishment of the Financial Stability Oversight Council, which will be responsible for identifying and monitoring systemic risks posed by financial firms, activities, and practices.

•

The development of regulations to limit debit card interchange fees.

•

The future elimination of trust preferred securities as a permitted element of Tier 1 capital.

•

The creation of a special regime to allow for the orderly liquidation of systemically important financial companies, including the establishment of an orderly liquidation fund.

•

The development of regulations to address derivatives markets, including clearing and exchange trading requirements and a framework for regulating derivatives-market participants.

•

Enhanced supervision of credit rating agencies through the Office of Credit Ratings within the SEC.

•

Increased regulation of asset-backed securities, including a requirement that issuers of asset-backed securities retain at least 5% of the risk of the asset-backed securities.

•

The establishment of a Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, within the Federal Reserve, to serve as a dedicated consumer-protection regulatory body.

•

On February 7, 2011, the FDIC issued a final rule redefining the assessment base as required by Dodd-Frank. The final rule adopted a separate risk-based assessment system for large insured depository institutions (institutions with greater than $10 billion in assets). The final rule applies to all insured depository institutions and is effective on April 1, 2011.

Financial continues to evaluate the potential impact of the Dodd-Frank Reform Act.

Schedule I

Net Interest Margin Analysis

Average Balance Sheets

For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010


	2011								2010
	Average Balance Sheet			Interest Income/ Expense		Average Rates Earned/ Paid			Average Balance Sheet			Interest Income/ Expense		Average Rates Earned/ Paid
ASSETS
Loans, including fees (1) (2)	$	323,000		$	4,355		5.35	%	$	327,354		$	4,969		6.02	%
Federal funds sold		9,467			5		0.21	%		9,361			6		0.25	%
Securities (3)		61,937			473		3.03	%		41,913			415		3.94	%
Federal agency equities		1,947			3		0.61	%		2,200			2		0.18	%
CBB equity		116			—		—			116			—		—


Total earning assets		396,467			4,836		4.84	%		380,944			5,392		5.62	%


Allowance for loan losses		(4,718	)							(4,788	)
Non-earning assets		38,336								35,690


Total assets	$	430,085							$	411,846


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits
Demand interest bearing	$	65,466		$	86		0.52	%	$	56,626		$	145		1.02	%
Savings		172,748			266		0.61	%		175,902			574		1.29	%
Time deposits		86,888			437		2.00	%		82,057			525		2.54	%


Total interest bearing deposits		325,102			789		0.96	%		314,585			1,244		1.57	%

Other borrowed funds
Repurchase agreements		9,063			21		0.92	%		8,581			30		1.39	%
Other borrowings		10,000			75		2.98	%		10,000			75		2.98	%
Capital Notes		7,000			105		6.00	%		7,000			105		6.00	%

Total interest-bearing liabilities		351,165			990		1.12	%		340,166			1,454		1.70	%

Non-interest bearing deposits		51,796								46,060
Other liabilities		212								231




Total liabilities		403,173						386,457

Stockholders’ equity		26,912						25,389


Total liabilities and Stockholders equity	$	430,085					$	411,846


Net interest income			$	3,846					$	3,938


Net interest margin					3.85	%					4.10	%


Interest spread					3.72	%					3.92	%

(1)	Net deferred loan fees and costs are included in interest income.

(2)	Nonperforming loans are included in the average balances. However, interest income and yields calculated do not reflect any accrued interest associated with nonaccrual loans.

(3)	The interest income and yields calculated on securities have been tax affected to reflect any tax exempt interest on municipal securities.

Net Interest Margin Analysis

Average Balance Sheets

For the Nine months Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010


	2011								2010
	Average Balance Sheet			Interest Income/ Expense		Average Rates Earned/ Paid			Average Balance Sheet			Interest Income/ Expense		Average Rates Earned/ Paid
ASSETS
Loans, including fees (1) (2)	$	324,895		$	13,212		5.44	%	$	327,336		$	14,815		6.05	%
Federal funds sold		9,785			18		0.25	%		7,593			15		0.26	%
Securities (3)		58,281			1,415		3.25	%		45,879			1,378		4.02	%
Federal agency equities		2,006			29		1.93	%		2,200			25		1.46	%
CBB equity		116			—		—			116			—		—


Total earning assets		395,083			14,674		4.97	%		383,124			16,233		5.66	%


Allowance for loan losses		(5,156	)							(4,599	)
Non-earning assets		37,631								34,806


Total assets	$	427,558							$	413,331


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits
Demand interest bearing	$	63,757		$	287		0.60	%	$	52,791		$	428		1.08	%
Savings		178,748			1,142		0.85	%		180,292			2,220		1.65	%
Time deposits		83,682			1,294		2.07	%		83,416			1,719		2.76	%


Total interest bearing deposits		326,187			2,723		1.12	%		316,499			4,367		1.84	%

Other borrowed funds
Federal funds purchased		13			—		—			315			2		0.85	%
Repurchase agreements		8,149			55		0.90	%		8,967			95		1.42	%
Other borrowings		10,000			222		2.97	%		11,282			249		2.95	%
Capital Notes		7,000			315		6.00	%		7,000			315		6.00	%

Total interest-bearing liabilities		351,349			3,315		1.26	%		344,063			5,028		1.95	%

Non-interest bearing deposits		49,390								44,370
Other liabilities		260								161




Total liabilities		400,999						388,594

Stockholders’ equity		26,559						24,737


Total liabilities and Stockholders equity	$	427,558					$	413,331


Net interest income			$	11,359					$	11,205


Net interest margin					3.84	%					3.91	%


Interest spread					3.71	%					3.71	%

(1)	Net deferred loan fees and costs are included in interest income.

(2)	Nonperforming loans are included in the average balances. However, interest income and yields calculated do not reflect any accrued interest associated with nonaccrual loans.

(3)	The interest income and yields calculated on securities have been tax affected to reflect any tax exempt interest on municipal securities.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not applicable

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Financial’s management, including Financial’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, Financial’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective for the purpose of ensuring that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that Financial files or submits under the Exchange Act with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) (1) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (2) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There have been no significant changes during the quarter ended September 30, 2011, in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) or in other factors that could have significantly affected those controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Company is not involved in any pending legal proceedings at this time, other than routine litigation incidental to its business.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the SEC on March 28, 2011.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable

Item 4. [Removed and Reserved]

Item 5. Other Information

The Division of Securities and Retail Franchising (the “Division”) of the Virginia State Corporation Commission (the “SCC”) conducted an investigation of BOTJ Investment Group, Inc. (“Investment Group”), a subsidiary of Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”), and others, including Community Bankers Securities, LLC (“CBS”) and several individuals.

The Investment Group subsidiary has not operated since February 2010. The investigation was related to the offer and sale of certain securities to Virginia residents through private placements, including those issued by Medical Capital Holdings, Inc. and its affiliates. The Division alleged that Investment Group violated certain provisions of the Virginia Securities Act with respect to the offer and/or sale of the Medical Capital securities and therefore is responsible for the losses incurred by investors. On November 10, 2011, the SCC, Case No. SEC-2010-00082, entered a Settlement Order (the “Order”). Pursuant to the Order, Investment Group was ordered, among other things, to pay restitution to certain purchasers of Medical Capital securities in an aggregate amount equal to its assets as of October 18, 2011, which as of that date totaled $218,000, within 90 days of the entry of the Order. Investment Group intends to fully comply with the Order. If Investment Group does not comply with the order to pay restitution, it will be required to pay a penalty to the SCC. The Company understands that the Order is a full and final settlement of the Division’s investigation of Investment Group’s role in the offer of the foregoing securities.

Investment Group’s compliance with the financial terms of the Order is reflected in the Company’s write off of its investment in Investment Group during the quarter ended September 30, 2011, which resulted in a pretax charge of $218,000.

The Division made no allegations of wrongdoing against either the Company or its Bank of the James subsidiary, and neither is a party to the Order.

Item 6. Exhibits

The following are filed as Exhibits to this Form 10-Q:


Exhibit No.		Description of Exhibit

31.1		Certification of Robert R. Chapman III Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 10, 2011

31.2		Certification of J. Todd Scruggs Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 10, 2011

32.1		Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002, dated November 10, 2011

101		The following materials from Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited) as of September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income(unaudited) For the Three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the Nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (iv) Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income For the Nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010; (v) Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.*

Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	BANK OF THE JAMES FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.

Date: November 10, 2011	By	/S/ Robert R. Chapman III
		Robert R. Chapman III, President (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: November 10, 2011	By	/S/ J. Todd Scruggs
		J. Todd Scruggs, Secretary and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

Index of Exhibits


Exhibit No.		Description of Exhibit

31.1		Certification of Robert R. Chapman III Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 10, 2011

31.2		Certification of J. Todd Scruggs Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated November 10, 2011

32.1		Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002, dated November 10, 2011

101		The following materials from Bank of the James Financial Group, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2011 (unaudited) and December 31, 2010 (audited); (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income(unaudited) For the Three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010; (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the Nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (iv) Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income For the Nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010; (v) Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.*