BASIC ENERGY SERVICES, INC. - Quarter Report: 2011 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 001-32693
Basic Energy Services, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
54-2091194 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
500 W. Illinois, Suite 100 Midland, Texas (Address of principal executive offices) |
79701 (Zip code) |
(432) 620-5500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
42,428,030 shares of the registrants Common Stock were outstanding as of July 20, 2011.
BASIC ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
Index to Form 10-Q
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
4 | |||
Item 1. Financial Statements |
4 | |||
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2011 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2010 |
4 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the three months and six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (Unaudited) |
5 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2011 (Unaudited) |
6 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 (Unaudited) |
7 | |||
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements |
8 | |||
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
25 | |||
Managements Overview |
25 | |||
Segment Overview |
26 | |||
Operating Cost Overview |
29 | |||
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates |
29 | |||
Results of Operations |
31 | |||
Liquidity and Capital Resources |
33 | |||
Other Matters |
39 | |||
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
39 | |||
Item 4. Controls and Procedures |
39 | |||
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION |
40 | |||
Item 1. Legal Proceedings |
40 | |||
Item 1A. Risk Factors |
40 | |||
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
40 | |||
Item 6. Exhibits |
41 | |||
Signatures |
43 |
2
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This quarterly report contains certain statements that are, or may be deemed to be,
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act.
We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections
about future events and financial trends affecting the financial condition of our business. These
forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions,
including, among other things, the risk factors discussed in this quarterly report and in our most
recent annual report on Form 10-K and other factors, most of which are beyond our control.
The words believe, may, estimate, continue, anticipate, intend, plan, expect,
indicate and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. All
statements other than statements of current or historical fact contained in this quarterly report
are forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the forward-looking statements contained
in this quarterly report are based upon reasonable assumptions, the forward-looking events and
circumstances discussed in this quarterly report may not occur and actual results could differ
materially from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements.
Important factors that may affect our expectations, estimates or projections include:
| a decline in, or substantial volatility of, oil and natural gas prices, and any related changes in expenditures by our customers; | ||
| the effects of future acquisitions on our business; | ||
| changes in customer requirements in markets or industries we serve; | ||
| competition within our industry; | ||
| general economic and market conditions; | ||
| our access to current or future financing arrangements; | ||
| our ability to replace or add workers at economic rates; and | ||
| environmental and other governmental regulations. |
Our forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this quarterly report. Unless
otherwise required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
This quarterly report includes market share and industry data and forecasts that we obtained
from internal company surveys (including estimates based on our knowledge and experience in the
industry in which we operate), market research, consultant surveys, publicly available information,
and industry publications and surveys. Industry surveys and publications, consultant surveys and
forecasts generally state that the information contained therein has been obtained from sources
believed to be reliable. Although we believe such information is accurate and reliable, we have not
independently verified any of the data from third party sources cited or used for our managements
industry estimates, nor have we ascertained the underlying economic assumptions relied upon
therein. For example, the number of onshore well servicing rigs in the U.S. could be lower than our
estimate to the extent our two larger competitors have continued to report as stacked rigs
equipment that is not actually complete or subject to refurbishment. Statements as to our position
relative to our competitors or as to market share refer to the most recent available data.
3
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Basic Energy Services, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share data)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share data)
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash
equivalents |
$ | 220,910 | $ | 47,918 | ||||
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,997
and $3,078, respectively |
200,092 | 150,364 | ||||||
Accounts receivable related parties |
44 | 42 | ||||||
Income tax receivable |
78,195 | 79,480 | ||||||
Inventories |
25,662 | 21,556 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses |
6,334 | 5,425 | ||||||
Other current assets |
6,632 | 18,193 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets |
8,430 | 8,290 | ||||||
Total
current
assets |
546,299 | 331,268 | ||||||
Property and equipment,
net |
693,891 | 625,702 | ||||||
Deferred debt costs, net of amortization |
16,348 | 6,835 | ||||||
Goodwill |
16,287 | 16,150 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, net of
amortization |
43,727 | 45,833 | ||||||
Other assets |
12,555 | 4,025 | ||||||
Total
assets |
$ | 1,329,107 | $ | 1,029,813 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 39,787 | $ | 40,477 | ||||
Accrued expenses |
61,780 | 51,237 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
27,816 | 24,231 | ||||||
Other current
liabilities |
166 | 3,309 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
129,549 | 119,254 | ||||||
Long-term debt, net of unamortized discount or premium on
notes of $1,991 and $9,425,
respectively |
762,190 | 474,628 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities |
117,636 | 123,393 | ||||||
Other long-term
liabilities |
11,369 | 10,615 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock; $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized;
none
designated or issued at June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively |
| | ||||||
Common stock; $.01 par value; 80,000,000 shares authorized;
42,432,309 shares
issued, and 42,394,955 shares outstanding at
June 30, 2011; 42,394,809 shares
issued, and 41,310,447 shares outstanding at
December 31, 2010. |
424 | 424 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital |
343,385 | 335,927 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
(deficit) |
(35,446 | ) | (27,544 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock, at cost, 37,354 and 1,084,362 shares
at June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively |
| (6,884 | ) | |||||
Total
stockholders
equity |
308,363 | 301,923 | ||||||
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity |
$ | 1,329,107 | $ | 1,029,813 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
Basic Energy Services, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Completion and remedial services |
$ | 121,807 | $ | 61,533 | $ | 219,314 | $ | 106,767 | ||||||||
Fluid services |
81,415 | 58,801 | 153,760 | 110,948 | ||||||||||||
Well servicing |
83,881 | 49,529 | 153,028 | 91,325 | ||||||||||||
Contract drilling |
9,752 | 5,269 | 16,807 | 9,058 | ||||||||||||
Total revenues |
296,855 | 175,132 | 542,909 | 318,098 | ||||||||||||
Expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Completion and remedial services |
68,827 | 37,660 | 123,760 | 67,383 | ||||||||||||
Fluid services |
51,688 | 43,425 | 99,916 | 84,365 | ||||||||||||
Well servicing |
57,409 | 36,734 | 105,849 | 68,834 | ||||||||||||
Contract drilling |
7,393 | 3,725 | 11,878 | 6,995 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative, including stock-based compensation
of $2,078 and $1,439 in three months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010, and $3,758 and $2,589 in the six months ended June 30, 2011
and 2010, respectively |
34,138 | 26,820 | 65,479 | 51,897 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
34,784 | 34,250 | 67,764 | 67,348 | ||||||||||||
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets |
942 | 463 | (763 | ) | 1,174 | |||||||||||
Total expenses |
255,181 | 183,077 | 473,883 | 347,996 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
41,674 | (7,945 | ) | 69,026 | (29,898 | ) | ||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(11,842 | ) | (11,778 | ) | (23,184 | ) | (23,442 | ) | ||||||||
Interest income |
23 | 24 | 28 | 50 | ||||||||||||
Gain on bargain purchase |
| 1,772 | | 1,772 | ||||||||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt |
| | (49,366 | ) | | |||||||||||
Other income (expense) |
102 | 111 | 259 | 192 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |
29,957 | (17,816 | ) | (3,237 | ) | (51,326 | ) | |||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) |
(13,407 | ) | 7,144 | 1,294 | 19,063 | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 16,550 | $ | (10,672 | ) | $ | (1,943 | ) | $ | (32,263 | ) | |||||
Earnings (loss) per share of common stock: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.41 | $ | (0.27 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.81 | ) | |||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.40 | $ | (0.27 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.81 | ) | |||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
Basic Energy Services, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity
(in thousands, except share data)
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity
(in thousands, except share data)
Additional | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Paid-In | Treasury | Retained | Stockholders | ||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Stock | Earnings | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2010 |
42,394,809 | $ | 424 | $ | 335,927 | $ | (6,884 | ) | $ | (27,544 | ) | $ | 301,923 | |||||||||||
Issuances of restricted stock |
| | (32 | ) | 5,783 | (5,751 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization of share-based
compensation |
| | 3,758 | | | 3,758 | ||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
| | | (1,761 | ) | | (1,761 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options / vesting
of restricted stock |
37,500 | | 3,732 | 2,862 | (208 | ) | 6,386 | |||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | | (1,943 | ) | (1,943 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance June 30, 2011 (unaudited) |
42,432,309 | $ | 424 | $ | 343,385 | $ | | $ | (35,446 | ) | $ | 308,363 |
See accompanying notes to
consolidated financial statements.
6
Basic Energy Services, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net loss
|
$ | (1,943 | ) | $ | (32,263 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
67,764 | 67,348 | ||||||
Gain on bargain purchase |
| (1,772 | ) | |||||
Accretion on asset retirement obligation |
65 | 81 | ||||||
Change in allowance for doubtful accounts |
(1,081 | ) | (953 | ) | ||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
967 | 762 | ||||||
Amortization of discount on senior secured notes |
6,484 | 937 | ||||||
Non-cash compensation |
3,758 | 2,589 | ||||||
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
(non-cash) |
3,940 | | ||||||
Premium on retirement of 11.625% senior
secured notes |
36,179 | | ||||||
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets |
(763 | ) | 1,174 | |||||
Deferred income taxes |
(6,088 | ) | (3,311 | ) | ||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(48,744 | ) | (30,886 | ) | ||||
Inventories |
(4,106 | ) | (1,439 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
(1,102 | ) | 3,747 | |||||
Other assets |
(8,531 | ) | (2,981 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable |
(690 | ) | 3,379 | |||||
Excess tax expense (benefit) from exercise of employee stock
options / vesting of restricted stock |
(3,508 | ) | 360 | |||||
Income tax payable |
4,793 | (15,460 | ) | |||||
Other liabilities |
(2,328 | ) | 1,587 | |||||
Accrued expenses |
10,515 | 5,505 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used
in) operating activities |
55,581 | (1,596 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment |
(114,873 | ) | (25,555 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of assets |
17,996 | 1,787 | ||||||
Change in restricted cash |
| (1,124 | ) | |||||
Payments for other long-term assets |
(287 | ) | (350 | ) | ||||
Payments for businesses, net of cash acquired |
(10 | ) | (10,312 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing
activities |
(97,174 | ) | (35,554 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from debt |
498,850 | | ||||||
Payments of debt |
(238,291 | ) | (13,805 | ) | ||||
Premium on retirement of 11.625% senior secured
notes |
(36,179 | ) | | |||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
(1,761 | ) | (316 | ) | ||||
Excess tax (expense) benefit from exercise of employee stock
options / vesting of restricted stock |
3,508 | (360 | ) | |||||
Tax withholding from exercise of stock options |
(2,529 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||
Exercise of employee stock options |
5,407 | 65 | ||||||
Deferred loan costs and other financing activities |
(14,420 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities |
214,585 | (14,432 | ) | |||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and
equivalents |
172,992 | (51,582 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period |
47,918 | 125,357 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents end of period |
$ | 220,910 | $ | 73,775 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
7
BASIC ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2011 (unaudited)
June 30, 2011 (unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation and Nature of Operations
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Basic Energy Services, Inc.
and subsidiaries (Basic or the Company) have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial reporting. Accordingly,
they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of
management, all adjustments which are of a normal recurring nature considered necessary for a fair
presentation have been made in the accompanying unaudited financial statements.
Nature of Operations
Basic provides a wide range of well site services to oil and natural gas drilling and
producing companies, including completion and remedial services, fluid services and well site
construction services, well servicing and contract drilling. These services are primarily provided
using Basics fleet of equipment. Basics operations are concentrated in the major United States
onshore oil and gas producing regions in Texas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana,
Wyoming, North Dakota, Colorado, Utah, Montana, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Basic and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries. Basic has no variable interest in any other organization, entity,
partnership, or contract. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
Estimates and Uncertainties
Preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates. Areas where critical accounting estimates are made by
management include:
| Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment and intangible assets |
| Impairment of property and equipment, goodwill and intangible assets |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts |
| Litigation and self-insured risk reserves |
| Fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed |
| Future cash flows |
| Stock-based compensation |
| Income taxes |
| Asset retirement obligations |
8
Revenue Recognition
Completion and Remedial Services Completion and remedial services consists primarily of
pumping services, focused on cementing, acidizing and fracturing, nitrogen units, coiled tubing
units, snubbing units, and rental and fishing tools. Basic recognizes revenue when services are
performed, collection of the relevant receivables is probable, persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists and the price is fixed or determinable. Basic prices completion and remedial
services by the hour, day, or project depending on the type of service performed. When Basic
provides multiple services to a customer, revenue is allocated to the services performed based on
the fair value of the services.
Fluid Services Fluid services consists primarily of the sale, transportation, storage and
disposal of fluids used in drilling, production and maintenance of oil and natural gas wells, and
well site construction and maintenance services. Basic recognizes revenue when services are
performed, collection of the relevant receivables is probable, persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists and the price is fixed or determinable. Basic prices fluid services by the job,
by the hour or by the quantities sold, disposed of or hauled.
Well Servicing Well servicing consists primarily of maintenance services, workover
services, completion services, plugging and abandonment services and rig manufacturing and
servicing. Basic recognizes revenue when services are performed, collection of the relevant
receivables is probable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists and the price is fixed or
determinable. Basic prices well servicing by the hour or by the day of service performed. Rig
manufacturing revenue is recognized when the rig is accepted by the customer, based on the
completed contract method by individual rig.
Contract Drilling Contract drilling consists primarily of drilling wells to a specified
depth using drilling rigs. Basic recognizes revenues based on either a daywork contract, in which
an agreed upon rate per day is charged to the customer, or a footage contract, in which an agreed
upon rate is charged per the number of feet drilled.
Taxes assessed on sales transactions are presented on a net basis and are not included in
revenue.
Inventories
For rental and fishing tools, inventories consisting mainly of grapples and drill bits are
stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost being determined by the average cost method. Other
inventories, consisting mainly of manufacturing raw materials, rig components, repair parts,
drilling and completion materials and gravel, are held for use in the operations of Basic and are
stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost being determined on the first-in, first-out
(FIFO) method.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost or at estimated fair value at acquisition date if
acquired in a business combination. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense
as incurred and additions and improvements that significantly extend the lives of the assets are
capitalized. Upon sale or other retirement of depreciable property, the cost and accumulated
depreciation and amortization are removed from the related accounts and any gain or loss is
reflected in operations. All property and equipment are depreciated or amortized (to the extent of
estimated salvage values) on the straight-line method. The components of a well servicing rig
generally require replacement or refurbishment during the well servicing rigs life and are
depreciated over their estimated useful lives, which range from 3 to 15 years. The costs of the
original components of a purchased or acquired well servicing rig are not maintained separately
from the base rig.
Impairments
Long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and equipment, and purchased intangibles subject
to amortization, are reviewed for impairment at least annually, or whenever, in managements
judgment, events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may
not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the
carrying amount of such assets to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated
by the assets. Expected future cash flows and carrying values are aggregated at their lowest
identifiable level. If the carrying amount of such assets exceeds its estimated future cash flows,
an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of such assets
exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented in the
consolidated balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less
costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated. The assets and liabilities, if material, of a
disposed group classified as held for sale would be presented separately in the appropriate asset
and liability sections of the consolidated balance sheet. These assets are normally sold within a
short period of time through a third party auctioneer.
9
Basics goodwill and trade name intangibles are considered to have an indefinite useful
economic life and are not amortized. Basic assesses impairment of its goodwill and trade name
intangibles annually as of December 31 or on an interim basis if events or circumstances indicate
that the fair value of the assets has decreased below the assets carrying value. A two-step
process is required for testing impairment of goodwill. First, the fair value of each reporting
unit is compared to its carrying value to determine whether an indication of impairment exists. If
impairment is indicated, then the fair value of the reporting units goodwill is determined by
allocating the units fair value to its assets and liabilities (including any unrecognized
intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. The amount
of impairment for goodwill is measured as the excess of its carrying value over its fair value.
Deferred Debt Costs
Basic capitalizes certain costs in connection with obtaining its borrowings, such as lenders
fees and related attorneys fees. These costs are amortized to interest expense using the effective
interest method.
Deferred debt costs were approximately $19.6 million net of accumulated amortization of $3.3
million and $10.7 million net of accumulated amortization of $3.9 million at June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively. Amortization of deferred debt costs totaled approximately $535,000
and $380,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Amortization of
deferred debt costs totaled approximately $967,000 and $762,000 for the six months ended June 30,
2011 and 2010, respectively.
Basic recorded a charge of $3.9 million during the first quarter of 2011 related to the
write-off of debt costs associated with its 11.625% Senior Secured Notes and $30.0 million
revolving credit facility. On February 15, 2011, Basic terminated the revolving credit facility and
completed the closing for an early tender for approximately $224.7 million of the Senior Secured
Notes and delivered to the trustee amounts required to satisfy and discharge remaining obligations
for the outstanding notes. Basic also incurred $2.9 million of deferred debt costs associated with
the $165.0 million revolving credit facility entered into on February 15, 2011. Additionally, on
June 13, 2011, Basic incurred $11.5 million of deferred
debt costs associated with the issuance of additional 7.75% Senior Notes due 2019.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill and other intangible assets not subject to amortization are tested for impairment
annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be
impaired. Basic completes its assessment of goodwill and trade name intangible impairment December
31 of each year.
Basic had trade names of $1.8 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Trade names
have an indefinite life and are tested for impairment annually.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2011 are as
follows (in thousands):
Completion and | ||||||||||||||||||||
Remedial | Fluid | Well | Contract | |||||||||||||||||
Services | Services | Servicing | Drilling | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2010 |
$ | 10,771 | $ | 488 | $ | 4,891 | $ | | $ | 16,150 | ||||||||||
Goodwill adjustments |
(74 | ) | 148 | 63 | | 137 | ||||||||||||||
Balance as of June 30, 2011 |
$ | 10,697 | $ | 636 | $ | 4,954 | $ | | $ | 16,287 |
Basics intangible assets subject to amortization consist of customer relationships,
non-compete agreements and rig engineering plans. The gross carrying amount of customer
relationships subject to amortization was $48.0 million at both June 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010. The gross carrying amount of non-compete agreements subject to amortization totaled
approximately $4.3 million and $4.9 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
The gross carrying amount of rig engineering plans subject to amortization was $746,000 at both
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Accumulated amortization related to these intangible assets
totaled approximately $11.1 million and $9.6 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010,
respectively. Amortization expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was
approximately $1.0 million and $844,000, respectively. Amortization expense for the six months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $2.1 million and $1.7 million,
respectively. Other intangibles net of accumulated amortization allocated to reporting units
as of June 30, 2011 were $30.0 million,
10
$2.5 million, $4.6 million and $4.8 million for completion
and remedial services, fluid services, well servicing, and contract drilling, respectively. No
adjustments were made to prior periods to reflect subsequent adjustments to acquisitions due to
immateriality.
Customer relationships are amortized over a 15-year life, non-compete agreements are amortized
over a five-year life, and rig engineering plans are amortized over a 15-year life.
Stock-Based Compensation
Basics stock-based awards consist of stock options and restricted stock. Stock options issued
are valued on the grant date using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model, and restricted
stock issued is valued based on the fair value of Basics common stock at the grant date. All
stock-based awards are adjusted for an expected forfeiture rate and amortized over the vesting
period.
Income Taxes
Basic recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using
statutory tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rate is recognized in the period that includes the statutory
enactment date. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is recognized when it is more likely
than not that the benefit of deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Interest charges are recorded in interest expense and penalties are recorded in income tax
expense.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments, which potentially subject Basic to concentration of credit risk,
consist primarily of temporary cash investments and trade receivables. Basic restricts investment
of temporary cash investments to financial institutions with high credit standing. Basics customer
base consists primarily of multi-national and independent oil and natural gas producers. Basic
performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers but generally does not require collateral on
its trade receivables. Credit risk is considered by management to be limited due to the large
number of customers comprising its customer base. Basic maintains an allowance for potential credit
losses on its trade receivables, and such losses have been within managements expectations.
Basic did not have any one customer that represented 10% or more of consolidated revenue
during the three months or six months ended June 30, 2011 or 2010.
Asset Retirement Obligations
Basic records the fair value of an asset retirement obligation as a liability in the period in
which it incurs a legal obligation associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and
capitalizes an equal amount as a cost of the asset depreciating it over the life of the asset.
Subsequent to the initial measurement of the asset retirement obligation, the obligation is
adjusted at the end of each quarter to reflect the passage of time, changes in the estimated future
cash flows underlying the obligation, acquisition or construction of assets, and settlements of
obligations.
Environmental
Basic is subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations.
These laws, which are constantly changing, regulate the discharge of materials into the environment
and may require Basic to remove or mitigate the adverse environmental effects of disposal or
release of petroleum, chemicals and other substances at various sites. Environmental expenditures
are expensed or capitalized depending on the future economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to
an existing condition caused by past operations and that have no future economic benefits are
expensed. Liabilities for expenditures of a non-capital nature are recorded when environmental
assessment and/or remediation is probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated.
11
Litigation and Self-Insured Risk Reserves
Basic estimates its reserves related to litigation and self-insured risks based on the facts
and circumstances specific to the litigation and self-insured claims, its past experience with
similar claims and the likelihood of the future event occurring. Basic maintains accruals on the
consolidated balance sheets to cover self-insurance retentions (See note 6).
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value
Measurements (ASU No. 2010-06). ASU No. 2010-06 requires the disclosure of significant transfers
in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. It also requires that Level 3 fair value
measurements present information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements. Fair value
disclosures should also disclose valuation techniques and inputs used to measure both recurring and
nonrecurring fair value measurements. This update became effective for Basic on January 1, 2010
except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward
in activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which became effective on January 1, 2011. This
update did not change the techniques Basic uses to measure fair value and has not had a material
impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09, Business Combinations: Disclosure of
Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations (ASU 2010-29). ASU 2010-29
addresses diversity in the interpretation of the pro forma revenue and earnings disclosure
requirements for business combinations. If a public entity presents comparative financial
statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the
business combination that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the
comparable prior annual reporting period only. The Company adopted ASU 2010-29 on January 1, 2011.
This update had no impact on the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
3. Acquisitions
In 2010, Basic acquired either substantially all of the assets or all of the outstanding
capital stock of each of the following businesses, each of which was accounted for using the
purchase method of accounting. The following table summarizes the provisional values at the date of
acquisition (in thousands):
Total Cash Paid (net of cash | ||||||||
Closing Date | acquired) | |||||||
Rocky Mountain Cementers, Inc. |
March 1, 2010 | $ | 687 | |||||
New Tech Systems, Inc |
April 20, 2010 | $ | 900 | |||||
Taylor Rig, LLC |
May 3, 2010 | $ | 8,734 | |||||
Platinum Pressure Services, Inc. and Admiral Well Service, Inc. |
December 16, 2010 | $ | 39,942 | |||||
Total 2010 |
$ | 50,263 | ||||||
The operations of each of the acquisitions listed above are included in Basics statement
of operations as of each respective closing date. Basic does not believe the pro forma effect of
any of the acquisitions completed in 2010 is material, either individually or when aggregated, to
the reported results of operations.
Contingent Earn-out Arrangements and Purchase Price Allocations
Contingent earn-out arrangements are generally arrangements entered into on certain
acquisitions to encourage the owner/manager to continue operating and building the business after
the purchase transaction. The contingent earn-out arrangements of the related acquisitions are
generally linked to certain financial measures and performance of the assets acquired in the
various acquisitions. For acquisitions that occurred prior to January 1, 2009, all amounts paid or
reasonably accrued for related to the contingent earn-out payments are reflected as increases to
the goodwill associated with the acquisition or compensation expense depending on the terms and
conditions of the earn-out arrangement. For any acquisition that occurred after December 31, 2008,
the contingent earn-out is measured at fair value at the date of acquisition and any adjustments to
that fair value are recorded through the statement of operations.
12
4. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Land |
$ | 5,391 | $ | 5,361 | ||||
Buildings and improvements |
35,310 | 32,047 | ||||||
Well service units and equipment |
429,343 | 416,015 | ||||||
Fluid services equipment |
159,073 | 148,989 | ||||||
Brine and fresh water stations |
11,306 | 10,969 | ||||||
Frac/test tanks |
183,611 | 151,379 | ||||||
Pressure pumping equipment |
186,575 | 171,892 | ||||||
Construction equipment |
28,571 | 27,799 | ||||||
Contract drilling equipment |
76,281 | 44,181 | ||||||
Disposal facilities |
70,129 | 66,388 | ||||||
Vehicles |
44,645 | 39,844 | ||||||
Rental equipment |
45,964 | 43,502 | ||||||
Aircraft |
4,251 | 4,251 | ||||||
Software |
22,248 | 22,296 | ||||||
Other |
9,547 | 7,345 | ||||||
1,312,245 | 1,192,258 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
618,354 | 566,556 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
$ | 693,891 | $ | 625,702 | ||||
Basic is obligated under various capital leases for certain vehicles and equipment that
expire at various dates during the next five years. The gross amount of property and equipment and
related accumulated amortization recorded under capital leases and included above consisted of the
following (in thousands):
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Light vehicles |
$ | 27,622 | $ | 25,800 | ||||
Well service units and equipment |
1,536 | 1,791 | ||||||
Fluid services equipment |
77,472 | 65,874 | ||||||
Pressure pumping equipment |
22,352 | 18,293 | ||||||
Construction equipment |
1,269 | 1,269 | ||||||
Software |
15,548 | 15,548 | ||||||
Other |
244 | 244 | ||||||
146,043 | 128,819 | |||||||
Less accumulated amortization |
58,793 | 56,087 | ||||||
$ | 87,250 | $ | 72,732 | |||||
Amortization of assets held under capital leases of approximately $5.2 million and $5.9
million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $10.2 million and $10.9 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, is included in depreciation and
amortization expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
13
5. Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Credit Facilities: |
||||||||
Revolver |
$ | 21,850 | $ | | ||||
7.125% Senior Notes |
225,000 | 225,000 | ||||||
11.625% Senior Secured Notes |
| 225,000 | ||||||
7.75% Senior Notes |
475,000 | | ||||||
Unamortized (discount) premium |
1,991 | (9,425 | ) | |||||
Capital leases and other notes |
66,165 | 58,284 | ||||||
790,006 | 498,859 | |||||||
Less current portion |
27,816 | 24,231 | ||||||
$ | 762,190 | $ | 474,628 | |||||
7.125% Senior Notes due 2016
On April 12, 2006, Basic issued $225.0 million of 7.125% Senior Notes due April 2016 (the
7.125% Senior Notes) in a private placement. Proceeds from the sale of the 7.125% Senior Notes
were used to retire the outstanding balance on Basics $90.0 million Term B Loan and to pay down
approximately $96.0 million under Basics previous revolving credit facility. The 7.125% Senior
Notes are unsecured. Under the terms of the sale of the 7.125% Senior Notes, Basic was required to
take appropriate steps to offer to exchange other 7.125% Senior Notes with the same terms that have
been registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the private placement 7.125% Senior
Notes. Basic completed the exchange offer for all of the 7.125% Senior Notes on October 16, 2006.
Basic issued the 7.125% Senior Notes pursuant to an indenture, dated as of April 12, 2006, by
and among Basic, the guarantor parties thereto and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as
trustee (the 7.125% Senior Notes Indenture). Interest on the 7.125% Senior Notes accrues at a
rate of 7.125% per year. Interest payments on the 7.125% Senior Notes are due semi-annually, on
April 15 and October 15.
The 7.125% Senior Notes are redeemable at the option of Basic on or after April 15, 2011 at
the specified redemption price as described in the 7.125% Senior Notes Indenture.
Following a change of control, as defined in the 7.125% Senior Notes Indenture, Basic will be
required to make an offer to repurchase all or any portion of the 7.125% Senior Notes at a purchase
price of 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase.
The 7.125% Senior Notes Indenture contains covenants that, among other things, limit the
ability of Basic and its restricted subsidiaries to incur additional
indebtedness; pay dividends or repurchase or redeem capital stock; make certain investments; incur
liens; enter into certain types of transactions with affiliates; limit dividends or other payments
by restricted subsidiaries; and sell assets or consolidate or merge with or into other companies.
These limitations are subject to a number of important qualifications and exceptions set forth in
the 7.125% Senior Notes Indenture. At June 30, 2011, Basic was in compliance with the restrictive
covenants under the 7.125% Senior Notes Indenture.
As part of the issuance of the above-mentioned 7.125% Senior Notes, Basic incurred debt
issuance costs of approximately $4.6 million, which are being amortized to interest expense using
the effective interest method over the term of the 7.125% Senior Notes.
The 7.125% Senior Notes are jointly and severally, and unconditionally, guaranteed on a
senior unsecured basis by all of Basics current subsidiaries, other than three immaterial
subsidiaries. As of June 30, 2011, these three subsidiaries held no assets and performed no
operations. Basic Energy Services, Inc., the ultimate parent company, does not have any independent
operating assets or operations.
7.75% Senior Notes due 2019
On February 15, 2011, Basic successfully completed the issuance and sale of $275.0 million and
on June 13, 2011, Basic successfully completed the issuance and sale of an additional $200.0
million, for an aggregate principal amount of $475.0 million of 7.75% Senior Notes due 2019 (the
7.75% Senior Notes). The 7.75% Senior Notes are jointly and severally, and unconditionally,
14
guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by all of Basics current subsidiaries, other than three
immaterial subsidiaries. The 7.75% Senior Notes and the guarantees rank (i) equally in right of
payment with any of Basics and the subsidiary guarantors existing and future senior indebtedness,
including Basics existing 7.125% Senior Notes and the related guarantees, and (ii) effectively
junior to all existing or future liabilities of Basics subsidiaries that do not guarantee the
7.75% Senior Notes and to Basics and the subsidiary guarantors existing or future secured
indebtedness to the extent of the value of the collateral therefore.
The 7.75% Senior Notes were offered and sold in private transactions in accordance with Rule
144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act).
The purchase price for the $275.0 million of 7.75% Senior Notes issued on February 15, 2011
was 100.000% of their principal amount and the purchase price for the $200.0 million of 7.75%
Senior Notes issued on June 13, 2011 was 101.000%, plus accrued interest from February 15, 2011.
Basic received net proceeds from the issuance of the 7.75% Senior Notes of approximately $465.5
million after premiums and offering expenses. Basic used a portion of the net proceeds from the
February 2011 offering to fund its tender offer and consent solicitation for its 11.625% Senior
Secured Notes and to redeem any of the Senior Secured Notes not purchased in the tender offer.
Basic also intends to use a portion of the net proceeds from the June 2011 offering to fund the
$180.0 million purchase price for the Maverick companies acquisition completed in July 2011 and
for general corporate purposes.
The 7.75% Senior Notes were issued pursuant to an indenture dated as of February 15, 2011
(the 7.75% Senior Notes Indenture), by and among Basic, the guarantors party thereto and Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee . Interest on the 7.75% Senior Notes accrues from and including
February 15, 2011 at a rate of 7.75% per year. Interest on the 7.75% Senior Notes is payable
semi-annually in arrears on February 15 and August 15 of each year, commencing on August 15, 2011.
The 7.75% Senior Notes mature on February 15, 2019.
The 7.75% Senior Notes Indenture contains covenants that, among other things, limit Basics
ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to: incur additional indebtedness;
pay dividends or repurchase or redeem capital stock; make certain investments; incur liens;
enter into certain types of transactions with its affiliates; limit dividends or other payments by Basics
restricted subsidiaries to Basic; and
sell assets or consolidate or merge with or into other companies.
These and other covenants that are contained in the 7.75% Senior Notes Indenture are subject to important exceptions
and qualifications set forth in the 7.75% Senior Notes Indenture. At June 30, 2011, Basic was in
compliance with the restrictive covenants under the 7.75% Senior Notes Indenture.
Basic may, at its option, redeem all or part of the 7.75% Senior Notes, at any time on or
after February 15, 2015, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus
a premium declining ratably to par and accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption.
At any time before February 15, 2014, Basic, at its option, may redeem up to 35% of the
aggregate principal amount of the 7.75% Senior Notes issued under the 7.75% Senior Notes Indenture
with the net cash proceeds of one or more qualified equity offerings at a redemption price of
107.750% of the principal amount of the 7.75% Senior Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid
interest to the date of redemption, as long as:
| at least 65% of the aggregate principal amount of the 7.75% Senior Notes issued under the 7.75% Senior Notes Indenture remains outstanding immediately after the occurrence of such redemption; and |
| such redemption occurs within 90 days of the date of the closing of any such qualified equity offering. |
15
In addition, at any time before February 15, 2015, Basic may redeem some or all of the 7.75%
Senior Notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 7.75% Senior Notes,
plus an applicable premium and accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption.
Following a change of control,
as defined in the 7.75% Senior Notes Indenture, Basic will be required to make an offer to repurchase
all or a portion of the Notes at 101% of their
principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase.
Revolving Credit Facility
On February 15, 2011, in connection with the 7.75% Senior
Notes offering, Basic entered into a new $165.0
million revolving credit facility (the Credit Agreement) with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner &
Smith Incorporated and Capital One, National Association, as joint lead arrangers and joint book
managers, the lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent. The Credit
Agreement includes an accordion feature whereby the total credit available to Basic can be
increased by up to $100.0 million under certain circumstances, subject to additional lender
commitments. The obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed on a joint and several basis
by each of Basics current subsidiaries, other than three immaterial subsidiaries, and are secured
by substantially all assets of Basic and the guarantors as collateral under a related Security
Agreement (the Security Agreement). As of June 30, 2011, the non-guarantor subsidiaries held no
assets and performed no operations.
Borrowings under the Credit Agreement mature on January 15, 2016, and Basic has the ability at
any time to prepay the Credit Agreement without premium or penalty. At Basics option, advances
under the Credit Agreement may be comprised of (i) alternate base rate loans, at a variable base
interest rate plus a margin ranging from 1.50% to 2.25% based on Basics leverage ratio or (ii)
Eurodollar loans, at a variable base interest rate plus a margin ranging from 2.50% to 3.25% based
on Basics leverage ratio. Basic will pay a commitment fee equal to 0.50% on the daily unused
amount of the commitments under the Credit Agreement.
The Credit Agreement contains various covenants that, subject to agreed upon exceptions, limit
Basics ability and the ability of certain of Basics subsidiaries to:
| incur indebtedness; |
| grant liens; |
| enter into sale and leaseback transactions; |
| make loans, capital expenditures, acquisitions and investments; |
| change the nature of business; |
| acquire or sell assets or consolidate or merge with or into other companies; |
| declare or pay dividends; |
| enter into transactions with affiliates; |
| enter into burdensome agreements; |
| prepay, redeem or modify or terminate other indebtedness; |
| change accounting policies and reporting practices; and |
| amend organizational documents. |
The Credit Agreement also contains covenants that, among other things, limit the amount of
capital contributions Basic may make and require Basic to maintain specified ratios or conditions
as follows:
| a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio of not less than 2.50:1.00; |
16
| a maximum consolidated leverage ratio not to exceed: |
| 4.25:1.00 for the quarter ending March 31, 2011; and |
| 4.00:1.00 after March 31, 2011; and |
| a maximum consolidated senior secured leverage ratio of 2.00:1.00. |
If an event of default occurs under the Credit Agreement, then the lenders may (i) terminate
their commitments under the Credit Agreement, (ii) declare any outstanding loans under the Credit
Agreement to be immediately due and payable after applicable grace periods and (iii) foreclose on
the collateral secured by the Security Agreement.
Basic had $21.9 million outstanding under the Credit Agreement as of June 30, 2011.
At June 30, 2011, Basic was in compliance with its covenants under the Credit Agreement.
Other Debt
Basic has a variety of other capital leases and notes payable outstanding that are generally
customary in its business. None of these debt instruments are individually material. Basics leases
with Banc of America Leasing & Capital, LLC require us to maintain a minimum debt service coverage
ratio of 1.05 to 1.00. At June 30, 2011, Basic was in compliance with this covenant.
Basics interest expense consisted of the following (in thousands):
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Cash payments for interest |
$ | 18,630 | $ | 21,802 | ||||
Commitment and other fees paid |
438 | 9 | ||||||
Amortization of debt issuance costs and discount or premium on notes |
1,213 | 1,699 | ||||||
Change in accrued interest |
2,871 | (73 | ) | |||||
Other |
32 | 5 | ||||||
$ | 23,184 | $ | 23,442 | |||||
Losses on Extinguishment of Debt
In February 2011, upon the retirement of the 11.625% Senior Secured Notes and the termination
of Basics $30.0 million revolving credit facility, Basic wrote off unamortized debt issuance costs
of approximately $3.9 million and unamortized discount of $9.2 million. Basic also paid a premium
of $36.2 million to the holders of the 11.625% Senior Secured Notes for the early termination of
the notes.
6. Commitments and Contingencies
Environmental
Basic is subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations that
establish standards and requirements for protection of the environment. Basic cannot predict the
future impact of such standards and requirements which are subject to change and can have
retroactive effectiveness. Basic continues to monitor the status of these laws and regulations.
Management believes that the likelihood of any of these items resulting in a material adverse
impact to Basics financial position, liquidity, capital resources or future results of operations
is remote.
Currently, Basic has not been fined, cited or notified of any environmental violations that
would have a material adverse effect upon its financial position, liquidity or capital resources.
However, management does recognize that by the very nature of its business, material costs could be
incurred in the near term to bring Basic into total compliance. The amount of such future
expenditures is not determinable due to several factors, including the unknown magnitude of
possible contamination, the unknown timing and extent of
17
the corrective actions which may be
required, the determination of Basics liability in proportion to other responsible parties and the
extent to which such expenditures are recoverable from insurance or indemnification.
During April 2011, Basic and certain officers received notice from the Travis County District Attorney of a
pending investigation of a potential felony criminal case referred by Texas Parks & Wildlife and the Texas
Environmental Enforcement Task Force, to be presented to a Travis County grand jury. The potential matter relates
to a land farm owned by Basic located in Jefferson County, Texas. While Basic is currently responding to additional
inquiries regarding the investigation and believes the investigation may also relate to alleged unlawful discharges,
Basic has not been informed of any specific potential charges at this time. Basic does not believe it is probable or
reasonably possible that this matter will result in any material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of
operations or liquidity; however, there can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcome of this matter.
Litigation
From time to time, Basic is a party to litigation or other legal proceedings that Basic
considers to be a part of the ordinary course of business. Basic is not currently involved in any
legal proceedings that it considers probable or reasonably possible, individually or in the
aggregate, to result in a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations
or liquidity.
Self-Insured Risk Accruals
Basic is self-insured up to retention limits as it relates to workers compensation, general
liability claims, and medical and dental coverage of its employees. Basic generally maintains no
physical property damage coverage on its workover rig fleet, with the exception of certain of its
24-hour workover rigs and newly manufactured rigs. Basic has deductibles per occurrence for
workers compensation, general liability claims, and medical and dental coverage of $500,000,
$500,000, and $250,000, respectively. Basic has lower deductibles per occurrence for automobile
liability. Basic maintains accruals in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets related to
self-insurance retentions by using third-party data and claims history.
At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, self-insured risk accruals totaled approximately $16.8
million net of a $8,000 receivable for medical and dental coverage and $16.6 million net of a
$164,000 receivable for medical and dental coverage, respectively.
7. Stockholders Equity
Common Stock
At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, Basic had 80,000,000 shares of common stock, par value
$.01 per share, authorized.
During the year ended 2010, Basic issued 53,975 shares of common stock from treasury stock
upon the exercise of stock options.
In March 2010, Basic granted various employees 588,600 restricted shares of common stock which
vest over a five-year period.
In March 2010, the Compensation Committee of Basics Board of Directors approved grants of
performance-based stock awards to certain members of management. In February 2011, it was
determined that 285,281 shares, or 150% of the target number of shares, were earned based on
Basics achievement of total stockholder return over the performance period from January 1, 2010
through December 31, 2010, as compared to other members of a defined peer group. These restricted
shares remain subject to vesting over a three-year period, with the first shares vesting on March
15, 2012.
In March 2011, Basic granted various employees 510,399 restricted shares of common stock that
vest over a three-year period.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, Basic issued 390,750 shares of common stock from
treasury stock for the exercise of stock options and 37,500 shares of newly-issued common stock for the exercise of stock options.
Treasury Stock
Basic has acquired treasury shares through net share settlements for payment of payroll taxes
upon the vesting of restricted stock. Basic acquired a total of 40,381 shares through net share
settlements during 2010 and 76,077 shares through net share settlements during the first six months
of 2011.
Preferred Stock
At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, Basic had 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par
value $.01 per share, authorized, of which none was designated, issued or outstanding.
18
8. Incentive Plan
In May 2003, Basics board of directors and stockholders approved the Basic Energy Services,
Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan (as amended effective May 24, 2011) (the Plan), which provides for
granting of incentive awards in the form of stock options, restricted stock, performance awards,
bonus shares, phantom shares, cash awards and other stock-based awards to officers, employees,
directors and consultants of Basic. The Plan assumed awards of the plans of Basics predecessors
that were awarded and remained outstanding prior to adoption of the Plan. The Plan provides for the
issuance of 8,350,000 shares. The Plan is administered by the Plan committee, and in the absence of
a Plan committee, by the Board of Directors, which determines the awards and the associated terms
of the awards and interprets its provisions and adopts policies for implementing the Plan. The
number of shares authorized under the Plan and the number of shares subject to an award under the
Plan will be adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, recapitalizations, mergers and other
changes affecting the capital stock of Basic.
During the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, compensation expense related to
share-based arrangements was approximately $2.1 million and $1.4 million, respectively. For
compensation expense recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, Basic
recognized a tax benefit of approximately $930,000 and $577,000, respectively. During the six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, compensation expense related to share-based arrangements was
approximately $3.8 million and $2.6 million, respectively. For compensation expense recognized
during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, Basic recognized a tax benefit of approximately
$1.5 million and $962,000, respectively.
As of June 30, 2011, there was approximately $20.0 million of total unrecognized compensation
related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan. That cost is
expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.86 years. The total fair value of
share-based awards vested during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $8.6
million and $3.8 million, respectively. The actual tax benefit realized for the tax deduction from
vested share-based awards was $2.8 million and $578,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and
2010, respectively.
Stock Option Awards
The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model. Basic is required to estimate the expected forfeiture
rate and only recognize expense for those options expected to vest. Options granted under the Plan
expire 10 years from the date they are granted, and generally vest over a three- to five-year
service period.
The following table reflects the summary of stock options outstanding at June 30, 2011 and the
changes during the six months then ended:
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Average | Aggregate | ||||||||||||||
Number of | Average | Remaining | Instrinsic | |||||||||||||
Options | Exercise | Contractual | Value | |||||||||||||
Granted | Price | Term (Years) | (000s) | |||||||||||||
Non-statutory stock
options: |
||||||||||||||||
Outstanding,
beginning of period |
1,414,450 | $ | 11.44 | |||||||||||||
Options granted |
| |||||||||||||||
Options forfeited |
(5,000 | ) | $ | 6.98 | ||||||||||||
Options exercised |
(428,250 | ) | $ | 6.71 | ||||||||||||
Options expired |
(3,000 | ) | $ | 26.84 | ||||||||||||
Outstanding, end of
period |
978,200 | $ | 13.49 | 3.67 | $ | 17,592 | ||||||||||
Exercisable, end of
period |
955,200 | $ | 13.27 | 3.62 | $ | 17,389 | ||||||||||
Vested or expected
to vest, end of
period |
973,600 | $ | 13.44 | 3.66 | $ | 17,551 | ||||||||||
19
The total intrinsic value of share options exercised during the six months ended June 30,
2011 and 2010 was approximately $8.3 million and $24,000, respectively.
Cash received from share option exercises under the Plan was approximately $2.9 million and
$58,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The actual tax benefit
realized for the tax deductions from options exercised was $3.0 million and $9,000 for the six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Basic has a history of issuing treasury and newly-issued shares to satisfy share option
exercises.
Restricted Stock Awards
On March 10, 2011, the Compensation Committee of Basics Board of Directors approved grants of
performance-based stock awards to certain members of management. The performance-based awards are
tied to Basics achievement of total stockholder return over the performance period from January 1,
2011 through December 31, 2011, as compared to other members of a defined peer group. The number of
shares to be issued will range from 0% to 150% of the 148,683 target number of shares depending on
the performance noted above. Any shares earned at the end of the performance period will then
remain subject to vesting over a three-year period, with the first shares vesting March 15, 2013.
As of June 30, 2011, Basic estimated that 129.2% of the target number of performance-based awards will
be earned.
A summary of the status of Basics non-vested share grants at June 30, 2011 and changes during
the six months ended June 30, 2011 is presented in the following table:
Weighted Average | ||||||||
Number of | Grant Date Fair | |||||||
Nonvested Shares | Shares | Value Per Share | ||||||
Nonvested at beginning
of period |
1,802,573 | $ | 11.06 | |||||
Granted during period |
702,931 | 19.49 | ||||||
Vested during period |
(329,018 | ) | 13.45 | |||||
Forfeited during period |
(74,023 | ) | 12.65 | |||||
Nonvested at end of period |
2,102,463 | $ | 13.44 | |||||
9. Related Party Transactions
Basic had receivables from employees of approximately $44,000 and $42,000 as of June 30, 2011
and December 31, 2010, respectively. During 2006, Basic entered into a lease agreement with Darle
Vuelta Cattle Co., LLC, an affiliate of the Chief Executive Officer, for approximately $69,000. The
term of the lease is five years and will continue on a year-to-year basis unless terminated by
either party. In December 2010, Basic entered into a lease agreement with Darle Vuelta Cattle Co.,
LLC, for the right to operate a salt water disposal well, brine well and fresh water well. The term
of the lease is two years and will continue until the salt water disposal well and brine well are
plugged and no fresh water is being sold. The lease payments are the greater of the sum of $0.10
per barrel of disposed oil and gas waste and $0.05 per barrel of brine or fresh water sold, or
$5,000 per month.
10. Earnings Per Share
Basics basic earnings per common share are determined by dividing net earnings applicable to
common stock by the weighted average number of common shares actually outstanding during the
period. Diluted earnings per common share is based on the increased number of shares that would be
outstanding assuming conversion of dilutive outstanding securities using the as if converted
method. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in
thousands, except share data):
20
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Numerator (both basic and diluted): |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 16,550 | $ | (10,672 | ) | $ | (1,943 | ) | $ | (32,263 | ) | |||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||||||||
Denominator for basic earnings (loss) per share |
40,356,049 | 39,724,030 | 40,135,143 | 39,672,891 | ||||||||||||
Stock options |
422,110 | | | | ||||||||||||
Unvested restricted stock |
557,505 | | | | ||||||||||||
Denominator for diluted earnings (loss) per share |
41,335,664 | 39,724,030 | 40,135,143 | 39,672,891 | ||||||||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per common share: |
$ | 0.41 | $ | (0.27 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.81 | ) | |||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share: |
$ | 0.40 | $ | (0.27 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.81 | ) | |||||
Stock options and unvested shares of restricted stock of approximately 524,000 were
excluded in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended June 30, 2010,
as the effect would have been anti-dilutive due to the net loss in the period. Stock options and
unvested shares of restricted stock of approximately 1,222,000 and 859,000, respectively, were
excluded in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the six months ended June 30, 2011
and 2010, respectively, as the effect would have been anti-dilutive due to the net loss in each of
these periods.
11. Business Segment Information
Basics reportable business segments are Completion and Remedial Services, Fluid Services,
Well Servicing, and Contract Drilling. The following is a description of the segments:
Completion and Remedial Services: This segment utilizes a fleet of pressure pumping units, air
compressor packages specially configured for underbalanced drilling operations, cased-hole wireline
units, an array of specialized rental equipment and fishing tools, and snubbing units. The largest
portion of this business consists of pumping services focused on cementing, acidizing and
fracturing services in niche markets.
Fluid Services: This segment utilizes a fleet of trucks and related assets, including
specialized tank trucks, storage tanks, water wells, disposal facilities, construction and other
related equipment. Basic employs these assets to provide, transport, store and dispose of a variety
of fluids, as well as provide well site construction and maintenance services. These services are
required in most workover, completion and remedial projects and are routinely used in daily
producing well operations.
Well Servicing: This business segment encompasses a full range of services performed with a
mobile well servicing rig, including the installation and removal of downhole equipment and
elimination of obstructions in the well bore to facilitate the flow of oil and natural gas. These
services are performed to establish, maintain and improve production throughout the productive life
of an oil and natural gas well and to plug and abandon a well at the end of its productive life.
Well servicing equipment and capabilities such as Basics are essential to facilitate most other
services performed on a well. This segment also includes the manufacturing, refurbishment and
servicing of mobile well servicing rigs and associated equipment.
Contract Drilling: This segment utilizes drilling rigs and associated equipment for drilling
wells to a specified depth for customers on a contract basis.
Basics management evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on operating
revenues and segment profits. Corporate expenses include general corporate expenses associated with
managing all reportable operating segments. Corporate assets consist principally of working capital
and debt financing costs.
The following table sets forth certain financial information with respect to Basics
reportable segments (in thousands):
21
Completion | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
and Remedial | Fluid | Well | Contract | Corporate | ||||||||||||||||||||
Services | Services | Servicing | Drilling | and Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2011
(Unaudited) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | 121,807 | $ | 81,415 | $ | 83,881 | $ | 9,752 | $ | | $ | 296,855 | ||||||||||||
Direct operating costs |
(68,827 | ) | (51,688 | ) | (57,409 | ) | (7,393 | ) | | $ | (185,317 | ) | ||||||||||||
Segment profits |
$ | 52,980 | $ | 29,727 | $ | 26,472 | $ | 2,359 | $ | | $ | 111,538 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and
amortization |
$ | 9,841 | $ | 10,359 | $ | 10,398 | $ | 2,326 | $ | 1,860 | $ | 34,784 | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures, (excluding acquisitions) |
$ | 12,638 | $ | 12,847 | $ | 11,633 | $ | 2,986 | $ | 2,327 | $ | 42,431 | ||||||||||||
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2010
(Unaudited) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | 61,533 | $ | 58,801 | $ | 49,529 | $ | 5,269 | $ | | $ | 175,132 | ||||||||||||
Direct operating costs |
(37,660 | ) | (43,425 | ) | (36,734 | ) | (3,725 | ) | | (121,544 | ) | |||||||||||||
Segment profits |
$ | 23,873 | $ | 15,376 | $ | 12,795 | $ | 1,544 | $ | | $ | 53,588 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and
amortization |
$ | 8,121 | $ | 9,478 | $ | 12,562 | $ | 1,882 | $ | 2,207 | $ | 34,250 | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures, (excluding acquisitions) |
$ | 3,429 | $ | 4,013 | $ | 5,305 | $ | 795 | $ | 921 | $ | 14,463 | ||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June
30, 2011 (Unaudited) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | 219,314 | $ | 153,760 | $ | 153,028 | $ | 16,807 | $ | | $ | 542,909 | ||||||||||||
Direct operating costs |
(123,760 | ) | (99,916 | ) | (105,849 | ) | (11,878 | ) | | $ | (341,403 | ) | ||||||||||||
Segment profits |
$ | 95,554 | $ | 53,844 | $ | 47,179 | $ | 4,929 | $ | | $ | 201,506 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and
amortization |
$ | 17,909 | $ | 19,764 | $ | 22,351 | $ | 4,233 | $ | 3,507 | $ | 67,764 | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures, (excluding acquisitions) |
$ | 30,359 | $ | 33,503 | $ | 37,889 | $ | 7,176 | $ | 5,946 | $ | 114,873 | ||||||||||||
Identifiable assets |
$ | 231,977 | $ | 195,403 | $ | 247,077 | $ | 70,245 | $ | 584,405 | $ | 1,329,107 | ||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June
30, 2010 (Unaudited) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenues |
$ | 106,767 | $ | 110,948 | $ | 91,325 | $ | 9,058 | $ | | $ | 318,098 | ||||||||||||
Direct operating costs |
(67,383 | ) | (84,365 | ) | (68,834 | ) | (6,995 | ) | | $ | (227,577 | ) | ||||||||||||
Segment profits |
$ | 39,384 | $ | 26,583 | $ | 22,491 | $ | 2,063 | $ | | $ | 90,521 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and
amortization |
$ | 15,952 | $ | 18,895 | $ | 24,703 | $ | 3,716 | $ | 4,082 | $ | 67,348 | ||||||||||||
Capital expenditures, (excluding acquisitions) |
$ | 6,053 | $ | 7,170 | $ | 9,373 | $ | 1,410 | $ | 1,549 | $ | 25,555 | ||||||||||||
Identifiable assets |
$ | 185,854 | $ | 183,971 | $ | 245,041 | $ | 39,624 | $ | 357,235 | $ | 1,011,725 |
22
The following table reconciles the segment profits reported above to the operating income
as reported in the consolidated statements of operations (in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Segment profits |
$ | 111,538 | $ | 53,588 | $ | 201,506 | $ | 90,521 | ||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
(34,138 | ) | (26,820 | ) | (65,479 | ) | (51,897 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(34,784 | ) | (34,250 | ) | (67,764 | ) | (67,348 | ) | ||||||||
Gain (loss) on disposal of assets |
(942 | ) | (463 | ) | 763 | (1,174 | ) | |||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | 41,674 | $ | (7,945 | ) | $ | 69,026 | $ | (29,898 | ) | ||||||
12. Supplemental Schedule of Cash Flow Information
The following table reflects non-cash financing and investing activity during the following
periods:
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Capital leases issued for equipment |
$ | 24,104 | $ | 6,691 | ||||
Asset retirement obligation additions |
$ | 11 | $ | 12 |
Basic paid no income taxes during the six months ended June 30, 2011 or for the same
period in 2010. Basic paid interest of approximately $18.6 million and $21.8 million during the six
months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
13. Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or the amount paid to transfer
a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants (an exit price) at the
measurement date. Fair value is a market based measurement considered from the perspective of a
market participant. Basic uses market data or assumptions that market participants would use in
pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the
inputs to the valuation. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated, or
unobservable. If observable prices or inputs are not available, unobservable prices or inputs are
used to estimate the current fair value, often using an internal valuation model. These valuation
techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is
dependent on the item being valued. Basic primarily applies a market approach for recurring fair
value measurements using the best available information while utilizing valuation techniques that
maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.
There is a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The
hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3
measurement). Basic classifies fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs. The
three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that Basic has the
ability to access. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability
occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
Level 2Inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are
either directly or indirectly observable. These inputs are either directly observable in the
marketplace or indirectly observable through corroboration with market data for substantially the
full contractual term of the asset or liability being measured.
Level 3Inputs reflect managements best estimate of what market participants would use in
pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. Consideration is given to the risk
inherent in the valuation technique and the risk inherent in the inputs to the model.
23
In valuing certain assets and liabilities, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into
different levels of the fair value hierarchy. For disclosure purposes, assets and liabilities are
classified in their entirety in the fair value hierarchy level based on the lowest level of input
that is significant to the overall fair value measurement. Basics assessment of the significance
of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the placement
within the fair value hierarchy levels.
Basics asset retirement obligation related to its salt water disposal sites, brine water
wells, gravel pits and land farm sites, each of which is subject to rules and regulations regarding
usage and eventual closure, is measured using primarily Level 3 inputs. The significant
unobservable inputs to this fair value measurement include estimates of plugging, abandonment and
remediation costs, inflation rate and well life. The inputs are calculated based on historical data
as well as current estimated costs. The fair value is calculated by taking the present value of the
expected cash flow at the time of the closure of the site. The following table reflects the changes
in the fair value of the liability during the six months ended June 30, 2011 (in thousands):
Asset | ||||
Retirement | ||||
Obligation | ||||
Balance, December 31, 2010 |
$ | 1,983 | ||
Additional asset retirement obligation |
11 | |||
Accretion expense |
65 | |||
Settlements |
(57 | ) | ||
Balance, June 30, 2011 |
$ | 2,002 | ||
14. Subsequent Events
On July 7, 2011, Basic completed the acquisition of substantially all of the operating assets
of Lone Star Anchor Trucking, Inc. for total cash consideration of $10.1 million. This acquisition
will operate in Basics fluid services segment.
On July 8, 2011, Basic completed the acquisition of the outstanding equity interests of the
Maverick companies (Maverick) for total cash consideration of $180.0 million, net of working
capital acquired. Maverick provides stimulation, coil tubing and thru-tubing services and will
operate in Basics completion and remedial services segment.
On July 15, 2011, Basic amended its existing revolving credit facility, increasing the
available credit from $165.0 million to $225.0 million. No changes were made to the collateral,
interest rates, or guarantors as part of this amendment.
During
July 2011, Basic received aggregate federal income tax refunds of
approximately $80.1 million relating to Basics 2009 and 2010
tax returns.
24
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Managements Overview
We provide a wide range of well site services to oil and natural gas drilling and producing
companies, including completion and remedial services, fluid services and well site construction
services, well servicing and contract drilling. Our results of operations reflect the impact of our
acquisition strategy as a leading consolidator in the domestic land-based well services industry.
Our acquisitions have increased our breadth of service offerings at the well site and expanded our
market presence. In implementing our acquisition strategy, we purchased businesses and assets in
four separate acquisitions from January 1, 2010 to June 30, 2011. Our weighted average number of
fluid service trucks increased from 791 in the first quarter of 2010 to 837 in the second quarter
of 2011. Our weighted average number of well servicing rigs increased from 405 in the first quarter
of 2010 to 412 in the second quarter of 2011. These acquisitions make our revenues, expenses and
income not directly comparable between periods.
Our operating revenues from each of our segments, and their relative percentages of our total
revenues, consisted of the following (dollars in millions):
Revenues:
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Completion and remedial services |
$ | 219.3 | 41 | % | $ | 106.8 | 33 | % | ||||||||
Fluid services |
153.8 | 28 | % | 110.9 | 35 | % | ||||||||||
Well servicing |
153.0 | 28 | % | 91.3 | 29 | % | ||||||||||
Contract drilling |
16.8 | 3 | % | 9.1 | 3 | % | ||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 542.9 | 100 | % | $ | 318.1 | 100 | % | ||||||||
Our core businesses depend on our customers willingness to make expenditures to produce,
develop and explore for oil and natural gas in the United States. Industry conditions are
influenced by numerous factors, such as the supply of and demand for oil and natural gas, domestic
and worldwide economic conditions, political instability in oil producing countries and merger and
divestiture activity among oil and natural gas producers. The volatility of the oil and natural gas
industry, and the consequent impact on exploration and production activity, has adversely impacted,
and could continue to adversely impact, the level of drilling and workover activity by some of our
customers. This volatility affects the demand for our services and the price of our services.
In the first half of 2009, utilization and pricing for our services declined due to low oil
and natural gas prices. In the third quarter of 2009, oil prices began to increase and remained
relatively stable through 2010. In the first half of 2011, oil prices have increased, primarily due
to political instability in several oil producing countries. This trend in oil prices has caused
utilization and pricing for our services to increase in our oil-based operating areas. Utilization
and pricing for our services in our natural gas-based operating areas throughout 2010 and in the
first half of 2011 have remained depressed due to low natural gas prices.
We expect that our utilization levels across all of our business segments should show further
improvements through the remainder of 2011 as demand continues to rise based on strong pricing,
particularly in our established oil-oriented market areas. Despite current lower natural gas
prices, discussions with customers indicate that demand in our natural gas-oriented market areas
should remain flat with current levels.
We derive a significant portion of our revenues from services supporting production from existing oil
and natural gas operations. Demand for these production-related services, including well servicing
and fluid services, tends to remain relatively stable, even in moderate oil and natural gas price
environments, as ongoing maintenance spending is required to sustain production. As oil and natural
gas prices fluctuate, demand for all of our services changes correspondingly as our customers must
balance maintenance and capital expenditures against their available cash flows. Because our
services are required to support drilling and workover activities, we are also subject to changes
in capital spending by our customers as oil and natural gas prices increase or decrease.
We believe that the most important performance measures for our lines of business are as
follows:
| Completion and Remedial Services segment profits as a percent of revenues; |
25
| Fluid Services trucking hours, revenue per truck, segment profits per truck and segment profits as a percent of revenues; | ||
| Well Servicing rig hours, rig utilization rate, revenue per rig hour, profits per rig hour and segment profits as a percent of revenues; and | ||
| Contract Drilling rig operating days, revenue per drilling day, profits per drilling day and segment profits as a percent of revenues. |
Segment profits are computed as segment operating revenues less direct operating costs. These
measurements provide important information to us about the activity and profitability of our lines
of business. For a detailed analysis of these indicators for our company, see below in Segment
Overview.
We will continue to evaluate opportunities to expand our business through selective
acquisitions and internal growth initiatives. In July of 2011 we
acquired substantially all of the operating assets of Lone Star Anchor
Trucking, Inc. and all of the outstanding equity interests of the
Maverick companies. Our capital investment decisions are determined by an
analysis of the projected return on capital employed for each of those alternatives, which is
substantially driven by the cost to acquire existing assets from a third party, the capital
required to build new equipment and the point in the oil and natural gas commodity price cycle.
Based on these factors, we make capital investment decisions that we believe will support our
long-term growth strategy. While we believe our costs of integration for prior acquisitions have
been reflected in our historical results of operations, integration of acquisitions may result in
unforeseen operational difficulties or require a disproportionate amount of our managements
attention.
Selected Acquisitions
During 2010, we made four acquisitions that complemented our existing business segments. These
included, among others:
Taylor Rig, LLC
On May 3, 2010, we acquired all the assets of Taylor Rig, LLC for total consideration of $8.7
million in cash. This acquisition has been included in our well servicing segment.
Platinum Pressure Services, Inc. and Admiral Well Service, Inc.
On December 16, 2010, we acquired all of the outstanding stock of Platinum Pressure Services,
Inc. (Platinum) and Admiral Well Service, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Platinum, for total
cash consideration of $39.9 million including working capital. This acquisition operates in our
completion and remedial services and well servicing segments.
During the first six months of 2011, we did not complete any material acquisitions.
Segment Overview
Completion and Remedial Services
During the first six months of 2011, our completion and remedial services segment represented
41% of our revenues. Revenues from our completion and remedial services segment are generally
derived from a variety of services designed to complete and stimulate new oil and natural gas
production or place cement slurry within the wellbores. Our completion and remedial services
segment includes pumping services, rental and fishing tool operations, cased-hole wireline
services, snubbing and underbalanced drilling.
Our pumping services concentrate on providing single truck, lower-horsepower cementing,
acidizing and fracturing services in selected markets. Our total hydraulic horsepower capacity for
our pressure pumping operations was 176,000 and 142,000 at June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010,
respectively.
In this segment, we generally derive our revenues on a project-by-project basis in a
competitive bidding process. Our bids are generally based on the amount and type of equipment and
personnel required, with the materials consumed billed separately. During periods of decreased
spending by oil and gas companies, we may be required to discount our rates to remain competitive,
which would cause lower segment profits.
26
The following is an analysis of our completion and remedial services segment for each of the
quarters in 2010, the full year ended December 31, 2010 and the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and
June 30, 2011 (dollars in thousands):
Segment | ||||||||
Revenues | Profits% | |||||||
2010: |
||||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 45,234 | 34 | % | ||||
Second Quarter |
$ | 61,533 | 39 | % | ||||
Third Quarter |
$ | 73,725 | 41 | % | ||||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 80,944 | 43 | % | ||||
Full Year |
$ | 261,436 | 40 | % | ||||
2011: |
||||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 97,507 | 44 | % | ||||
Second Quarter |
$ | 121,807 | 44 | % |
We gauge the performance of our completion and remedial services segment based on the
segments operating revenues and segment profits as a percent of revenues.
The increase in completion and remedial services revenue to $121.8 million in the second
quarter of 2011 from $97.5 million in the first quarter of 2011
as a result of improved pricing and expansion of our fleets. Segment profit percentage remained flat at 44% for both the second quarter of
2011 and the first quarter of 2011.
Fluid Services
During the first six months of 2011, our fluid services segment represented 28% of our
revenues. Revenues in our fluid services segment are earned from the sale, transportation, storage
and disposal of fluids used in the drilling, production and maintenance of oil and natural gas
wells. Revenues also include well site construction and maintenance services. The fluid services
segment has a base level of business consisting of transporting and disposing of salt water
produced as a by-product of the production of oil and natural gas. These services are necessary for
our customers and generally have a stable demand but typically produce lower relative segment
profits than other parts of our fluid services segment. Fluid services for completion and workover
projects typically require fresh or brine water for making drilling mud, circulating fluids or frac
fluids used during a job, and all of these fluids require storage tanks and hauling and disposal.
Because we can provide a full complement of fluid sales, trucking, storage and disposal required on
most drilling and workover projects, the add-on services associated with drilling and workover
activity enable us to generate higher segment profits. The higher segment profits are due to the
relatively small incremental labor costs associated with providing these services in addition to
our base fluid services segment. Revenues from our well site construction services are derived
primarily from preparing and maintaining access roads and well locations, installing small diameter
gathering lines and pipelines, constructing foundations to support drilling rigs and providing
maintenance services for oil and natural gas facilities. We typically price fluid services by the
job, by the hour or by the quantities sold, disposed of or hauled.
The following is an analysis of our fluid services operations for each of the quarters in
2010, the full year ended December 31, 2010 and the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and June 30, 2011
(dollars in thousands):
Weighted | Segment Profits | |||||||||||||||||||
Average Number of | Revenue Per | Per Fluid | ||||||||||||||||||
Fluid Service | Trucking | Fluid Service | Service | Segment | ||||||||||||||||
Trucks | Hours | Truck | Truck | Profits% | ||||||||||||||||
2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||
First Quarter |
791 | 431,700 | $ | 66 | $ | 14 | 22 | % | ||||||||||||
Second Quarter |
797 | 468,600 | $ | 74 | $ | 19 | 26 | % | ||||||||||||
Third Quarter |
789 | 475,200 | $ | 80 | $ | 20 | 25 | % | ||||||||||||
Fourth Quarter |
782 | 476,100 | $ | 85 | $ | 27 | 31 | % | ||||||||||||
Full Year |
790 | 1,851,600 | $ | 305 | $ | 80 | 26 | % | ||||||||||||
2011: |
||||||||||||||||||||
First Quarter |
820 | 494,700 | $ | 88 | $ | 29 | 33 | % | ||||||||||||
Second Quarter |
837 | 525,700 | $ | 97 | $ | 36 | 37 | % |
We gauge activity levels in our fluid services segment based on trucking hours, revenue and
segment profits per fluid service truck, and segment profits as a percent of revenues.
27
Revenue per fluid service truck increased by 10% to $97,000 in the second quarter of 2011
compared to $88,000 in the first quarter of 2011, primarily due to the increasing rates being
charged to customers and higher utilization for trucking and frac
tank rentals. Segment profit percentage increased to 37% in the second quarter of 2011 from
33% in the first quarter of 2011.
Well Servicing
During the first six months of 2011, our well servicing segment represented 28% of our
revenues. Revenue in our well servicing segment is derived from maintenance, workover, completion,
manufacturing and plugging and abandonment services. We provide maintenance-related services as
part of the normal, periodic upkeep of producing oil and natural gas wells. Maintenance-related
services represent a relatively consistent component of our business. Workover and completion
services generate more revenue per hour than maintenance work, due to the use of auxiliary
equipment, but demand for workover and completion services fluctuates more with the overall
activity level in the industry. We also have a rig manufacturing and servicing facility that
builds new workover rigs, performs large-scale refurbishments of used workover rigs and provides
maintenance services on previously manufactured rigs.
We typically charge our customers for services on an hourly basis at rates that are determined
by the type of service and equipment required, market conditions in the region in which the rig
operates, the ancillary equipment provided on the rig and the necessary personnel. Depending on the
type of job, we may also charge by the project or by the day. We measure our activity levels by the
total number of hours worked by all of the rigs in our fleet. We monitor our fleet utilization
levels, with full utilization deemed to be 55 hours per week per rig. Our fleet increased from a
weighted average number of 405 rigs in the first quarter of 2010 to 412 in the second quarter of
2011.
The following is an analysis of our well servicing operations for each of the quarters in
2010, the full year ended December 31, 2010 and the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and June 30,
2011:
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Rig | Profits | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Rig | Utilization | Revenue Per | Per Rig | Segment | |||||||||||||||||||
Rigs | Hours | Rate | Rig Hour | Hour | Profits% | |||||||||||||||||||
2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
First Quarter |
405 | 135,700 | 46.9 | % | $ | 308 | $ | 71 | 23 | % | ||||||||||||||
Second Quarter |
404 | 153,900 | 53.3 | % | $ | 316 | $ | 83 | 26 | % | ||||||||||||||
Third Quarter |
404 | 159,400 | 55.2 | % | $ | 319 | $ | 74 | 21 | % | ||||||||||||||
Fourth Quarter |
407 | 164,400 | 56.5 | % | $ | 331 | $ | 90 | 24 | % | ||||||||||||||
Full Year |
405 | 613,400 | 53.0 | % | $ | 319 | $ | 81 | 23 | % | ||||||||||||||
2011: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
First Quarter |
412 | 184,700 | 62.7 | % | $ | 356 | $ | 105 | 30 | % | ||||||||||||||
Second Quarter |
412 | 205,700 | 69.8 | % | $ | 376 | $ | 122 | 32 | % |
We gauge activity levels in our well servicing segment based on rig hours, rig utilization
rate, revenue per rig hour, segment profits per rig hour and segment profits as a percent of
revenues. Revenue per rig hour and profits per rig hour in the table above do not include revenues
and profits from the rig manufacturing and maintenance division of this business segment.
Rig utilization increased to 69.8% in the second quarter of 2011, compared to 62.7% in the
first quarter of 2011. The increase was caused by improving economic conditions and increased oil
prices that allowed our customers to increase spending. Our segment profit percentage increased
slightly to 32% during the second quarter of 2011 from 30% during the first quarter of 2011.
Contract Drilling
During the first six months of 2011, our contract drilling segment represented 3% of our
revenues. Revenues from our contract drilling segment are derived primarily from the drilling of
new wells.
Within this segment, we typically charge our drilling rig customers at a daywork daily rate,
or footage at an established rate per number of feet drilled. We measure the activity level of
our drilling rigs on a weekly basis by calculating a rig utilization rate based on a seven-day work
week per rig. Our contract drilling rig fleet had a weighted average of ten rigs during the second
quarter of 2011 compared to a weighted average of six rigs in the first quarter of 2011, due to the
purchase of four drilling rigs.
28
The following is an analysis of our contract drilling segment for each of the quarters in
2010, the full year ended December 31, 2010 and the quarters ended March 31, 2011 and June 30,
2011:
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Rig | |||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Operating | Revenue | Profits | Segment | ||||||||||||||||
Rigs | Days | Per Day | Per Day | Profits% | ||||||||||||||||
2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||
First Quarter |
9 | 420 | $ | 9,000 | $ | 1,200 | 14 | % | ||||||||||||
Second Quarter |
9 | 527 | $ | 10,000 | $ | 2,900 | 29 | % | ||||||||||||
Third Quarter |
9 | 523 | $ | 10,600 | $ | 2,700 | 26 | % | ||||||||||||
Fourth Quarter |
6 | 536 | $ | 11,500 | $ | 3,800 | 33 | % | ||||||||||||
Full Year |
8 | 2,006 | $ | 10,400 | $ | 2,800 | 27 | % | ||||||||||||
2011: |
||||||||||||||||||||
First Quarter |
6 | 522 | $ | 13,500 | $ | 4,900 | 36 | % | ||||||||||||
Second Quarter |
10 | 714 | $ | 13,700 | $ | 3,300 | 24 | % |
We gauge activity levels in our drilling operations based on rig operating days, revenue per
drilling day, profits per drilling day and segment profits as a percent of revenues.
The increase in revenue per day to $13,700 in the second quarter of 2011 from $13,500 in the
first quarter of 2011 was due primarily to improved pricing for our services. The decrease in
segment profit percentage to 24% in the second quarter of 2011 from 36% in the first quarter of
2011 was due to costs associated with the start-up of four drilling rigs purchased in 2011.
Operating Cost Overview
Our operating costs are comprised primarily of labor, including workers compensation and
health insurance, repair and maintenance, fuel and insurance. The majority of our employees are
paid on an hourly basis. We also incur costs to employ personnel to sell and supervise our services
and perform maintenance on our fleet. These costs are not directly tied to our level of business
activity. Compensation for our administrative personnel in local operating yards and in our
corporate office is accounted for as general and administrative expenses. Repair and maintenance is
performed by our crews, company maintenance personnel and outside service providers. Insurance is
generally a fixed cost regardless of utilization and relates to the number of rigs, trucks and
other equipment in our fleet, employee payroll and safety record.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our unaudited consolidated financial statements are impacted by the accounting policies used
and the estimates and assumptions made by management during their preparation. A complete summary
of our critical accounting policies is included in note 2 of the notes to our historical audited
consolidated financial statements in our most recent annual report on Form 10-K. The following is a
discussion of our critical accounting policies and estimates.
Critical Accounting Policies
We have identified below certain accounting policies that are of particular importance in the
presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows and that require the
application of significant judgment by management.
Property and Equipment. Property and equipment are stated at cost or at estimated fair value
at acquisition date if acquired in a business combination. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance
are charged to expenses as incurred. We also review the capitalization of refurbishment of workover
rigs as described in note 2 of the notes to our unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Impairments. We review our assets for impairment at least annually, or whenever, in
managements judgment, events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a
long-lived asset may not be recovered over its remaining service life. Provisions for asset
impairment are charged to income when the sum of the estimated future cash flows, on an
undiscounted basis, is less than the assets carrying amount. When impairment is indicated, an
impairment charge is recorded based on an estimate of future cash flows on a discounted basis.
29
Self-Insured Risk Accruals. We are self-insured up to retention limits with regard to workers
compensation, general liability claims, and medical and dental coverage of our employees. We
generally maintain no physical property damage coverage on our workover rig fleet, with the
exception of certain of our 24-hour workover rigs and newly manufactured rigs. We have deductibles
per occurrence for workers compensation, general liability claims, and medical and dental coverage
of $500,000, $500,000 and $250,000 respectively. We have lower deductibles per occurrence for
automobile liability. We maintain accruals in our consolidated balance sheets related to
self-insurance retentions by using third-party actuarial data and claims history.
Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenues when the services are performed, collection of the
relevant receivables is probable, persuasive evidence of the arrangement exists and the price is
fixed and determinable.
Income Taxes. We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using
statutory tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rate is recognized in the period that includes the statutory
enactment date. A valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is recognized when it is more likely
than not that the benefit of deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) requires management to make
certain estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the balance sheet
date and the amounts of revenues and expenses recognized during the reporting period. We analyze
our estimates based on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be
reasonable under the circumstances. However, actual results could differ from such estimates. The
following is a discussion of our critical accounting estimates.
Depreciation and Amortization. In order to depreciate and amortize our property and equipment
and our intangible assets with finite lives, we estimate the useful lives and salvage values of
these items. Our estimates may be affected by such factors as changing market conditions,
technological advances in the industry or changes in regulations governing the industry.
Impairment of Property and Equipment. Our impairment of property and equipment requires us to
estimate undiscounted future cash flows. Actual impairment charges are recorded using an estimate
of discounted future cash flows. The determination of future cash flows requires us to estimate
rates and utilization in future periods and such estimates can change based on market conditions,
technological advances in the industry or changes in regulations governing the industry.
Impairment of Goodwill. Our goodwill is considered to have an indefinite useful economic life
and is not amortized. We assess impairment of our goodwill annually as of December 31 or on an
interim basis if events or circumstances indicate that the fair value of the asset has decreased
below its carrying value. A two-step process is required for testing impairment. First, the fair
value of each reporting unit is compared to its carrying value to determine whether an indication
of impairment exists. If impairment is indicated, then the fair value of the reporting units
goodwill is determined by allocating the units fair value to its assets and liabilities (including
any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business
combination. The amount of impairment for goodwill is measured as the excess of its carrying value
over its fair value.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. We estimate our allowance for doubtful accounts based on an
analysis of historical collection activity and specific identification of overdue accounts. Factors
that may affect this estimate include (1) changes in the financial positions of our significant
customers and (2) a decline in commodity prices that could affect our entire customer base.
Litigation and Self-Insured Risk Reserves. We estimate our reserves related to litigation and
self-insured risk based on the facts and circumstances specific to the litigation and self-insured
risk claims and our past experience with similar claims. The actual outcome of litigated and
insured claims could differ significantly from estimated amounts. As discussed in Self-Insured
Risk Accruals above with respect to our critical accounting policies, we maintain accruals on our
balance sheet to cover self-insured retentions. These accruals are based on certain assumptions
developed using third-party data and historical data to project future losses. Loss estimates in
the calculation of these accruals are adjusted based upon actual claim settlements and reported
claims.
Fair Value of Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed. We estimate the fair value of assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations, which involves the use of various
assumptions. These estimates may be affected by such factors as changing
30
market conditions, technological advances in the industry or changes in regulations governing
the industry. The most significant assumptions, and the ones requiring the most judgment, involve
the estimated fair value of property and equipment, intangible assets and the resulting amount of
goodwill, if any. We test annually for impairment the goodwill and intangible assets with
indefinite useful lives recorded in business combinations. This requires us to estimate the fair
values of our own assets and liabilities at the reporting unit level. Therefore, considerable
judgment, similar to that described above in connection with our estimation of the fair value of an
acquired company, is required to assess goodwill and certain intangible assets for impairment.
Cash Flow Estimates. Our estimates of future cash flows are based on the most recent available
market and operating data for the applicable asset or reporting unit at the time the estimate is
made. Our cash flow estimates are used for asset impairment analyses.
Stock-Based Compensation. Our stock-based awards consist of stock options and restricted
stock. Stock options issued are valued on the grant date using the Black-Scholes-Merton
option-pricing model and restricted stock issued is valued based on the fair value of our common
stock at the grant date. All stock-based awards are adjusted for an expected forfeiture rate and
amortized over the vesting period.
Income Taxes. The amount and availability of our loss carryforwards (and certain other tax
attributes) are subject to a variety of interpretations and restrictive tests. The utilization of
such carryforwards could be limited or lost upon certain changes in ownership and the passage of
time. Accordingly, although we believe substantial loss carryforwards are available to us, no
assurance can be given concerning the realization of such loss carryforwards, or whether or not
such loss carryforwards will be available in the future.
Asset Retirement Obligations. We record the fair value of an asset retirement obligation as a
liability in the period in which we incur a legal obligation associated with the retirement of
tangible long-lived assets and capitalize an equal amount as a cost of the asset, depreciating it
over the life of the asset. Subsequent to the initial measurement of the asset retirement
obligation, the obligation is adjusted at the end of each quarter to reflect the passage of time,
changes in the estimated future cash flows underlying the obligation, acquisition or construction
of assets, and settlement of obligations.
Results of Operations
The following is a comparison of our results of operations for the three months and six months
ended June 30, 2011 compared to the three months and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.
For additional segment-related information and trends, please read Segment Overview above.
Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
Revenues. Revenues increased by 70% to $296.9 million during the second quarter of 2011 from
$175.1 million during the same period in 2010. This increase was primarily due to increased demand
by our customers for our services, which resulted from higher commodity prices and drilling and
well maintenance activity among our customers.
Completion and remedial services revenues increased by 98% to $121.8 million during the second
quarter of 2011 compared to $61.5 million in the same period in 2010. The increase in revenue
between these periods was due to improved utilization of equipment, resulting from higher drilling
and completion activity, as well as improved pricing for our services. Total hydraulic horsepower
increased to 176,000 at June 30, 2011 from 142,000 at June 30, 2010.
Fluid services revenues increased by 38% to $81.4 million during the second quarter of 2011
compared to $58.8 million in the same period in 2010. Our revenue per fluid service truck increased
31% to $97,000 in the second quarter of 2011 compared to $74,000 in the same period in 2010, which
reflects increases in both utilization and pricing for our services. Our weighted average number
of fluid service trucks increased 5% to 837 during the second quarter of 2011 from 797 in the same
period in 2010.
Well servicing revenues increased by 69% to $83.9 million during the second quarter of 2011
compared to $49.5 million during the same period in 2010. The higher revenues were due to the 34%
increase in rig hours to 205,700 during the second quarter of 2011 from 153,900 during the second
quarter of 2010. There was also an increase in revenue per rig hour to $376 during the second
quarter of 2011 from $316 during the second quarter of 2010. Our average number of well servicing
rigs increased to 412 during the second quarter of 2011 compared to 404 in the same period in 2010,
primarily due to the acquisition of Platinum Pressure Services, Inc. (Platinum) in the fourth
quarter of 2010.
31
Contract drilling revenues increased by 85% to $9.8 million during the second quarter of 2011
compared to $5.3 million in the same period in 2010. The number of rig operating days increased 35%
to 714 in the second quarter of 2011 compared to 527 in the second quarter of 2010. This increase
was due to the addition of four drilling rigs in the first six months of 2011 and an increase in
new well starts in the Permian Basin, a region in which all of our drilling rigs operate, along
with higher dayrates.
Direct Operating Expenses. Direct operating expenses, which primarily consist of labor ,
including workers compensation and health insurance, repair and maintenance, fuel and insurance, increased by 53% to $185.3 million during the second quarter of 2011 from $121.5 million in the
same period in 2010. This increase was primarily due to increased activity in each of our four
business segments.
Direct
operating expenses for the completion and remedial services segment increased by 83% to
$68.8 million during the second quarter of 2011 as compared to $37.7 million for the same period in
2010 due primarily to personnel and other costs associated with increased activity levels overall
and in our pumping services line. Segment profits increased to 44% of revenues during the second
quarter of 2011 compared to 39% for the same period in 2010, due to higher utilization and improved
pricing for our services.
Direct operating expenses for the fluid services segment increased by 19% to $51.7 million
during the second quarter of 2011 as compared to $43.4 million for the same period in 2010, mainly
due to personnel and other costs associated with increased activity levels. Segment profits were
37% of revenues during the second quarter of 2011 compared to 26% for the same period in 2010 due
to improved pricing for our services.
Direct operating expenses for the well servicing segment increased by 56% to $57.4 million
during the second quarter of 2011 as compared to $36.7 million for the same period in 2010. The
increase in direct operating expenses was due to increased activity along with increased payroll,
insurance and incentive compensation costs. Segment profits were 32% of revenues during the second
quarter of 2011 compared to 26% for the same period in 2010 due to improved pricing and higher utilization for our
services.
Direct operating expenses for the contract drilling segment increased to $7.4 million during
the second quarter of 2011 from $3.7 million for the same period in 2010. Segment profits for this
segment decreased to 24% of revenues during the second quarter of 2011 compared to 29% for the same
period in 2010, primarily due to costs associated with the start-up of four drilling rigs purchased
in 2011.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses increased by 27% to
$34.1 million during the second quarter of 2011 from $26.8 million for the same period in 2010, due
mainly to increased personnel costs, including payroll taxes and incentive compensation, and the
full quarter effect of the general and administrative expense from the Platinum acquisition that
was completed on December 16, 2010. General and administrative expenses included $2.1 million and
$1.4 million of stock-based compensation expense during the second quarter of 2011 and 2010,
respectively.
Depreciation and Amortization Expenses. Depreciation and amortization expenses were $34.8
million during the second quarter of 2011 as compared to $34.3 million for the same period in 2010.
Interest Expense. Interest expense remained flat at $11.8 million for both the second quarter of
2011 and the same period in 2010.
Income Tax Expense. There was income tax expense of $13.4 million during the second quarter of
2011 as compared to an income tax benefit of $7.1 million for the same period in 2010. Our
effective tax rate during the second quarter of 2011 and 2010 was approximately 45% and 40%,
respectively.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
Revenues. Revenues increased by 71% to $542.9 million during the first six months of 2011 from
$318.1 million during the same period in 2010. This increase was primarily due to increased
expenditures by our customers for our services.
Completion and remedial services revenues increased by 105% to $219.3 million during the first
six months of 2011 compared to $106.8 million in the same period in 2010. The increase in revenue
between these periods was due primarily to improved utilization of equipment, resulting from higher
drilling and completion activity, as well as improved pricing for our
services. The increased revenues also
reflect the impact of our Platinum business acquired in December 2010. Total hydraulic horsepower increased to
176,000 at June 30, 2011 from 142,000 at June 30, 2010.
32
Fluid services revenues increased by 39% to $153.7 million during the first six months of 2011
compared to $110.9 million in the
same period in 2010. Our weighted average number of fluid service
trucks increased by 4% to 828
during the first six months of 2011 from 794 in the same period in 2010, and our revenue per fluid
service truck increased to $186,000 in the first six months of 2010 compared to $140,000 in the
same period in 2010, which reflects the increase in utilization and pricing for these services.
Well servicing revenues increased by 68% to $153.0 million during the first six months of 2011
compared to $91.3 million during the same period in 2010. This increase was due to the 35% increase
in rig hours to 390,400 during the first six months of 2011 from 289,600 during the same period in
2010. Revenue per rig hour increased 17% to $366 during the first six months of 2011 from $312
during the first six months of 2010, due to increased pricing and activity for our services. Our
average number of well servicing rigs increased to 412 during the first six months of 2011 compared
to 405 in the same period in 2010.
Contract drilling revenues increased by 86% to $16.8 million during the first six months of
2011 compared to $9.1 million in the same period in 2010. The number of rig operating days
increased to 1,236 in the first six months of 2011 compared to 947 in the first six months of 2010.
This increase was due to the addition of four drilling rigs in the first six months of 2011 and
increases in new well starts in the Permian Basin, a region in which all of our drilling rigs
operate, along with higher day rates.
Direct Operating Expenses. Direct operating expenses, which primarily consist of labor,
including workers compensation and health insurance, fuel and maintenance and repair costs,
increased by 50% to $341.4 million during the first six months of 2011 from $227.6 million in the
same period in 2010. This increase was primarily due to the increased activity in each of our four
business segments.
Direct operating expenses for the completion and remedial services segment increased by 84% to
$123.8 million during the first six months of 2011 as compared to $67.4 million for the same period
in 2010, due primarily to increased activity levels. Segment profits increased to 44% of revenues
during the first six months of 2011 compared to 37% for the same period in 2010, due to higher
utilization of our services and improved pricing for our services.
Direct operating expenses for the fluid services segment increased by 18% to $99.9 million
during the first six months of 2011 as compared to $84.4 million for the same period in 2010.
Segment profits were 35% of revenues during the first six months of 2011 compared to 24% for the
same period in 2010, primarily due to increases in pricing along with increased activity levels.
Direct operating expenses for the well servicing segment increased by 54% to $105.8 million
during the first six months of 2011 as compared to $68.8 million for the same period in 2010, while
rig hours increased 35% to 390,400 in the first six months of 2011 from 289,600 for the same period
in 2010. The increase in direct operating expenses is primarily due to the increase in rig hours.
Segment profits were higher at 31% of revenues during the first six months of 2011 compared to 25%
for the same period in 2010.
Direct operating expenses for the contract drilling segment increased by 70% to $11.9 million
during the first six months of 2011 as compared to $7.0 million for the same period in 2010.
Segment profits for this segment were 29% of revenues during the first six months of 2011 compared
to 23% for the same period in 2010, mainly due to increases in pricing for our services.
General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses increased by 26% to
$65.5 million during the first six months of 2011 from $51.9 million for the same period in 2010,
which included $3.8 million and $2.6 million in stock-based compensation expense during the first
six months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase was primarily due to increased personnel
costs, including payroll taxes, and the full six-month effect of the general and administrative
expense from the Platinum acquisition that was completed on December 16, 2010.
Depreciation and Amortization Expenses. Depreciation and amortization expenses were $67.8 million
during the first six months of 2011 as compared to $67.3 million for the same period in 2010,
reflecting the increase in the size of and investment in our asset base.
Interest Expense. Interest expense remained flat at $23.2 million during the first six months
of 2011 compared to $23.4 million for the same period in 2010.
Income Tax Expense. There was an income tax benefit of $1.3 million during the first six
months of 2011 as compared to an income tax benefit of $19.1 million for the same period in 2010.
Our effective tax rate during the first six months of 2011 and 2010 was approximately 40% and 37%,
respectively.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2011, our primary capital resources were net proceeds from our 7.75% Senior
Notes offerings, net cash flows from our operations, utilization of capital leases and our $165.0
million revolving credit facility. As of June 30, 2011, we had unrestricted cash and cash
equivalents of $220.9 million compared to $47.9 million as of December 31, 2010. This increase was
due in part to the issuance of $200.0 million of 7.75% notes in June 2011. We used $180.0 million
of these proceeds to acquire the Maverick group of
33
companies on July 8, 2011. When appropriate, we will consider public or private debt and
equity offerings and non-recourse transactions to meet our liquidity needs.
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities was $55.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011
as compared to cash used in operating activities of $1.6 million during the same period in 2010.
Operating cash flow in the first six months of 2011 was higher mainly due to the increase in
profitability due to higher revenues offset by the increase in accounts receivable.
Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures are the main component of our investing activities. Cash capital
expenditures (including acquisitions) during the first six months of 2011 were $114.9 million as
compared to $35.9 million in the same period of 2010. We added $24.1 million of additional assets
through our capital lease program during the first six months of 2011 compared to $6.7 million of
additional assets in the same period in 2010.
For 2011, we now plan to spend at least $183 million for capital expenditures, including
amounts spent to purchase four drilling rigs, of which $130 million will be paid for through
operating cash flow and existing cash balances and the remainder through capital leases. Based on
our view of short-term operating conditions, our capital expenditure program may be increased or
decreased accordingly. The foregoing budget excludes acquisitions of other businesses. We do not
budget acquisitions in the normal course of business, and we regularly engage in discussions
related to potential acquisitions related to the well services industry.
Capital Resources and Financing
We currently believe that our operating cash flows, available funds from our revolving credit
facility, and cash on hand will be sufficient to fund our near term liquidity requirements.
Our ability to access additional sources of financing will be dependent on our operating cash
flows and demand for our services, which could be negatively impacted due to the extreme volatility
of commodity prices and declines in capital and debt markets.
7.125% Senior Notes due 2016
In April 2006, we completed a private offering of $225.0 million aggregate principal amount of
7.125% Senior Notes due April 15, 2016 (the 7.125% Senior Notes). The 7.125% Senior Notes were
jointly and severally guaranteed by each of our restricted subsidiaries (currently all of our
subsidiaries other than three immaterial subsidiaries). As of June 30, 2011, these three
subsidiaries held no assets and performed no operations. The net proceeds from the offering were
used to retire our outstanding Term B Loan balance and to pay down the outstanding balance under
our previous credit facility. Remaining proceeds were used for general corporate purposes,
including acquisitions.
We issued the 7.125% Senior Notes pursuant to an indenture, dated as of April 12, 2006, by and
among us, the guarantor parties thereto and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee
(the 7.125% Senior Notes Indenture).
Interest on the 7.125% Senior Notes accrues at a rate of 7.125% per year. Interest on the
7.125% Senior Notes is payable in cash semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October 15 of each
year. The 7.125% Senior Notes mature on April 15, 2016. The 7.125% Senior Notes and the guarantees
are unsecured and rank equally with all of our and the guarantors existing and future unsecured
and unsubordinated obligations. The 7.125% Senior Notes and the guarantees rank senior in right of
payment to any of our and the guarantors existing and future obligations that are, by their terms,
expressly subordinated in right of payment to the 7.125% Senior Notes and the guarantees. The
7.125% Senior Notes and the guarantees are effectively subordinated to our and the guarantors
secured obligations to the extent of the value of the assets securing such obligations.
The 7.125% Senior Notes Indenture contains covenants that limit our ability and the ability of
certain of our subsidiaries to:
| incur additional indebtedness; | ||
| pay dividends or repurchase or redeem capital stock; |
34
| make certain investments; | ||
| incur liens; | ||
| enter into certain types of transactions with affiliates; | ||
| limit dividends or other payments by restricted subsidiaries; and | ||
| sell assets or consolidate or merge with or into other companies. |
These limitations are subject to a number of important qualifications and exceptions.
Upon an Event of Default (as defined in the 7.125% Senior Notes Indenture), the trustee or the
holders of at least 25% in aggregate principal amount of the 7.125% Senior Notes then outstanding
may declare all of the amounts outstanding under the 7.125% Senior Notes to be due and payable
immediately.
We may, at our option, redeem all or part of the 7.125% Senior Notes, at any time on or after
April 15, 2011 at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus a premium
declining ratably to par and accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption.
Following a change of control, as defined in the 7.125% Senior Notes Indenture, we will be
required to make an offer to repurchase all or any portion of the 7.125% Senior Notes at a purchase
price of 101% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of
repurchase.
11.625% Senior Secured Notes due 2014
On July 31, 2009, we issued $225.0 million aggregate principal amount of 11.625% Senior
Secured Notes due 2014 (the Senior Secured Notes) in a private placement. The Senior Secured
Notes were jointly and severally, and unconditionally, guaranteed on a senior secured basis
initially by all of our current subsidiaries other than two immaterial subsidiaries.
The net proceeds from the issuance of the Senior Secured Notes were $207.7 million after
discounts of $12.1 million and offering expenses of $5.2 million. We used the net proceeds from the
offering, along with other funds, to repay all outstanding indebtedness under our $225.0 million
revolving credit facility, which we terminated in connection with the offering.
The Senior Secured Notes and the related guarantees were issued pursuant to an indenture dated
as of July 31, 2009 (the Senior Secured Notes Indenture), by and among us, the guarantors party
thereto and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., a national banking association, as
trustee. The obligations under the Senior Secured Notes Indenture were secured as set forth in the
Senior Secured Notes Indenture and in a Secured Notes Security Agreement, in favor of the trustee,
by a first-priority lien (other than Permitted Collateral Liens, as defined in the Senior Secured
Notes Indenture) in favor of the trustee, on the Collateral described in the Secured Notes Security
Agreement.
Interest on the Senior Secured Notes accrued at a rate of 11.625% per year. Interest on the
Senior Secured Notes was payable semi-annually in arrears on February 1 and August 1 of each year,
commencing on February 1, 2010. The Senior Secured Notes provided for a maturity on August 1, 2014.
The Senior Secured Notes Indenture contained covenants that, among other things, limit our
ability and the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to:
| incur additional indebtedness; | ||
| pay dividends or repurchase or redeem capital stock; | ||
| make certain investments; | ||
| incur liens; |
35
| enter into certain types of transactions with our affiliates; | ||
| limit dividends or other payments by our restricted subsidiaries to us; and | ||
| sell assets (including Collateral under the Secured Notes Security Agreement), or consolidate or merge with or into other companies. |
These limitations were subject to a number of important exceptions and qualifications.
On February 1, 2011, Basic announced a cash tender offer and consent solicitation with respect
to any and all of the $225.0 million aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Senior Secured
Notes. On February 15, 2011, Basic completed the closing for an early tender for approximately
$224.7 million of the Senior Secured Notes and delivered to the trustee amounts required to satisfy
and discharge remaining obligations for the outstanding notes. The tender offer expired on March 2,
2011, and as of June 30, 2011, all obligations of Basic under the Senior Secured Notes Indenture
have been satisfied and no Senior Secured Notes remain outstanding.
7.75% Senior Notes due 2019
On February 15, 2011, we successfully completed the issuance and sale of $275.0 million and on
June 13, 2011, we successfully completed the issuance and sale of an additional $200.0 million, for
an aggregate principal amount of $475.0 million of 7.75% Senior Notes due 2019 (the 7.75% Senior
Notes). The 7.75% Senior Notes are jointly and severally, and unconditionally, guaranteed on a
senior unsecured basis initially by all of our current subsidiaries other than three immaterial
subsidiaries. The 7.75% Senior Notes and the guarantees rank (i) equally in right of payment with
any of our and the subsidiary guarantors existing and future senior indebtedness, including our
existing 7.125% Senior Notes and the related guarantees, and (ii) effectively junior to all
existing or future liabilities of our subsidiaries that do not guarantee the 7.75% Senior Notes and
to our and the subsidiary guarantors existing or future secured indebtedness to the extent of the
value of the collateral therefor.
The 7.75% Senior Notes and the guarantees were offered and sold in private transactions in
accordance with Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The
purchase price for the $275.0 million of 7.75% Senior Notes issued on February 15, 2011 and guarantees was 100.000% of their
principal amount and the purchase price for the $200.0 million of 7.75% Senior Notes issued on June 13, 2011 and guarantees
was 101.000%, plus accrued interest from February 15, 2011. We received net proceeds from the
issuance of the 7.75% Senior Notes of approximately $465.5 million after premiums and offering
expenses. We used a portion of the net proceeds from the offering to fund our tender offer and
consent solicitation for our Senior Secured Notes and to redeem the Senior Secured Notes not
purchased in the tender offer. We also used a portion of the net proceeds from this offering to
fund the $180.0 million purchase price for our Maverick companies acquisition completed in July
2011 and for general corporate purposes.
The 7.75% Senior Notes and the guarantees were issued pursuant to an indenture dated as of
February 15, 2011 (the 7.75% Senior Notes Indenture), by and among us, the guarantors party
thereto and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee. Interest on the 7.75% Senior Notes accrues from and
including February 15, 2011 at a rate of 7.75% per year. Interest on the 7.75% Senior Notes is
payable semi-annually in arrears on February 15 and August 15 of each year, commencing on August
15, 2011. The 7.75% Senior Notes mature on February 15, 2019.
The 7.75% Senior Notes Indenture contains covenants that, among other things, limit our
ability and the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to:
| incur additional indebtedness; | ||
| pay dividends or repurchase or redeem capital stock; | ||
| make certain investments; | ||
| incur liens; | ||
| enter into certain types of transactions with affiliates; | ||
| limit dividends or other payments by our restricted subsidiaries to us; and |
36
| sell assets or consolidate or merge with or into other companies. |
These and other covenants that are contained in the 7.75% Senior Notes Indenture are subject
to important exceptions and qualifications.
Additionally, during any period of time that the 7.75% Senior Notes have a Moodys rating of
Baa3 or higher or an Standard & Poors rating of BBB- or higher and no default has occurred and is
then continuing, certain of the restrictive covenants contained in the 7.75% Senior Notes Indenture
will cease to apply.
We may, at our option, redeem all or part of the 7.75% Senior Notes, at any time on or after
February 15, 2015, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus a
premium declining ratably to par and accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption.
At any time before February 15, 2014, we, at our option, may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate
principal amount of the 7.75% Senior Notes issued under the 7.75% Senior Notes Indenture with the
net cash proceeds of one or more qualified equity offerings at a redemption price of 107.750% of
the principal amount of the 7.75% Senior Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to
the date of redemption, as long as:
| at least 65% of the aggregate principal amount of the 7.75% Senior Notes issued under the 7.75% Senior Notes Indenture remains outstanding immediately after the occurrence of such redemption; and | ||
| such redemption occurs within 90 days of the date of the closing of any such qualified equity offering. |
In addition, at any time before February 15, 2015, we may redeem some or all of 7.75% Senior
Notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 7.75% Senior Notes,
plus an applicable premium and accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption.
Following a change of control, as defined in the
7.75% Senior Notes Indenture, Basic will be required to make an offer to repurchase
all or a portion of the 7.75% Senior Notes at 101% of their
principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase.
New Revolving Credit Facility
On February 15, 2011, in connection with the initial offering of 7.75% Senior Notes, we
terminated our previous $30.0 million secured revolving credit facility with Capital One, National
Association, and entered into a new $165.0 million revolving credit facility (the Credit
Agreement) with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Capital One, National
Association, as joint lead arrangers and joint book managers, the lenders party thereto and Bank of
America, N.A., as administrative agent. The Credit Agreement includes an accordion feature whereby
the total credit available to Basic can be increased by up to $100.0 million under certain
circumstances, subject to additional lender commitments. The obligations under the Credit Agreement
are guaranteed on a joint and several basis by each of Basics current subsidiaries, other than
three immaterial subsidiaries, and are secured by substantially all assets of Basic and the
guarantors as collateral under a related Security Agreement (the Security Agreement). As of June
30, 2011, the non-guarantor subsidiaries held no assets and performed no operations. On July 15,
2011, we exercised the accordion feature and amended the Credit Agreement to increase our total
credit available from $165.0 million to $225.0 million.
Borrowings under the Credit Agreement mature on January 15, 2016, and Basic has the ability at
any time to prepay the Credit Agreement without premium or penalty. At Basics option, advances
under the Credit Agreement may be comprised of (i) alternate base rate loans, at a variable base
interest rate plus a margin ranging from 1.50% to 2.25% based on Basics leverage ratio or (ii)
Eurodollar loans, at a variable base interest rate plus a margin ranging from 2.50% to 3.25% based
on Basics leverage ratio. Basic will pay a commitment fee equal to 0.50% on the daily unused
amount of the commitments under the Credit Agreement.
The Credit Agreement contains various covenants that, subject to agreed upon exceptions, limit
Basics ability and the ability of certain of Basics subsidiaries to:
| incur indebtedness; | ||
| grant liens; |
37
| enter into sale and leaseback transactions; | ||
| make loans, capital expenditures, acquisitions and investments; | ||
| change the nature of business; | ||
| acquire or sell assets or consolidate or merge with or into other companies; | ||
| declare or pay dividends; | ||
| enter into transactions with affiliates; | ||
| enter into burdensome agreements; | ||
| prepay, redeem or modify or terminate other indebtedness; | ||
| change accounting policies and reporting practices; and | ||
| amend organizational documents. |
The Credit Agreement also contains covenants that, among other things, limit the amount of
capital contributions Basic may make and require Basic to maintain specified ratios or conditions
as follows:
| a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio of not less than 2.50:1.00; | ||
| a maximum consolidated leverage ratio not to exceed: |
| 4.25:1.00 for the quarter ending March 31, 2011; and | ||
| 4.00:1.00 after March 31, 2011; and |
| a maximum consolidated senior secured leverage ratio of 2.00:1.00. |
If an event of default occurs under the Credit Agreement, then the lenders may (i) terminate
their commitments under the Credit Agreement, (ii) declare any outstanding loans under the Credit
Agreement to be immediately due and payable after applicable grace periods and (iii) foreclose on
the collateral secured by the Security Agreement.
We had $21.9 million outstanding under the Credit Agreement as of June 30, 2011. At June 30,
2011, we were in compliance with our covenants under the Credit Agreement.
Other Debt
We have a variety of other capital leases and notes payable outstanding that is generally
customary in our business. None of these debt instruments is material individually. Our leases with
Banc of America Leasing & Capital, LLC require us to maintain a minimum debt service coverage ratio
of 1.05 to 1.00. As of June 30, 2011, we had total capital leases of approximately $66.2 million.
38
Preferred Stock
At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we had 5,000,000 shares of $.01 par value preferred
stock authorized, of which none was designated, issued or outstanding.
Other Matters
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current
or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses,
results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to
investors.
Net Operating Losses
As of June 30, 2011, we had approximately $41.6 million of net operating loss carryforwards.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value
Measurements (ASU No. 2010-06). ASU No. 2010-06 requires the disclosure of significant transfers
in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. It also requires that Level 3 fair value
measurements present information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements. Fair value
disclosures should also disclose valuation techniques and inputs used to measure both recurring and
nonrecurring fair value measurements. This update became effective for Basic on January 1, 2010
except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward
in activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which became effective on January 1, 2011. This
update did not change the techniques Basic uses to measure fair value and has not had a material
impact on Basics consolidated financial statements.
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09, Business Combinations: Disclosure of
Supplementary Pro Forma Information for Business Combinations (ASU 2010-29). ASU 2010-29
addresses diversity in the interpretation of the pro forma revenue and earnings disclosure
requirements for business combinations. If a public entity presents comparative financial
statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the
business combination that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the
comparable prior annual reporting period only. Basic adopted ASU 2010-29 on January 1, 2011. This
update had no impact on Basics financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Impact of Inflation on Operations
Management is of the opinion that inflation has not had a significant impact on our business.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
As of June 30, 2011, we had no material changes to the disclosure on this matter made in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) are effective to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports that we file or submit under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in
the SECs rules and forms and effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in such
reports is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive
officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
39
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the most recent fiscal quarter, there have been no changes in our internal control over
financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, Basic is a party to litigation or other legal proceedings that Basic
considers to be a part of the ordinary course of business. Basic is not currently involved in any
legal proceedings that it considers probable or reasonably possible, individually or in the
aggregate, to result in a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations
or liquidity. The information regarding litigation and environmental
matters described in note 6 of the notes to our unaudited
consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
For information regarding risks that may affect our business, see the risk factors included in
our most recent annual report on Form 10-K under the heading Risk Factors.
In addition to the risk factors disclosed in our Form 10-K, the following are additional risk
factors that should be considered in connection with our business:
Federal and state legislative and regulatory initiatives related to hydraulic fracturing could
result in operating
restrictions or delays in the completion of oil and natural gas wells that may reduce demand for
our well
servicing activities and could adversely affect our financial position, results of operations and
cash flows.
We provide hydraulic fracturing services to our customers. Hydraulic fracturing is a commonly
used process that involves injection of water, sand, and certain chemicals to fracture the
hydrocarbon-bearing rock formation to allow flow of hydrocarbons into the wellbore. The federal
Energy Policy Act of 2005 amended the Underground Injection Control (UIC) provisions of the
federal Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) to exclude certain hydraulic fracturing practices from the
definition of underground injection. The EPA has asserted regulatory authority over certain
hydraulic fracturing activities involving diesel fuel and has begun the process of drafting
guidance relating to such practices. In addition, repeal of the SDWA exclusion of hydraulic
fracturing has been advocated by certain advocacy organizations and others in the public. In March
2011, companion bills entitled the Fracturing Responsibility and Awareness of Chemicals (FRAC) Act
were reintroduced in the United States Senate and House of Representatives. These bills, which are
currently under consideration by Congress, would repeal the exemption for hydraulic fracturing from
the SDWA, which would have the effect of allowing the EPA to promulgate new regulations and
permitting requirements for hydraulic fracturing, and would require the disclosure of the chemical
constituents of hydraulic fracturing fluids to a regulatory agency, which would make the
information public via the internet. Scrutiny of hydraulic fracturing activities continues in other
ways, with the EPA having commenced a study of the potential environmental impacts of hydraulic
fracturing, the initial results of which are expected to be available by late 2012 and the final
results of which are expected in 2014. The U.S. Department of the Interior has also announced that
it will consider regulations relating to the use of hydraulic fracturing techniques on public lands
and disclosure of fracturing fluid constituents.
In addition, some states and localities have adopted, and others are considering adopting, regulations or
ordinances that could restrict hydraulic fracturing in certain circumstances, that would require, with
some exceptions, disclosure of constituents of hydraulic fracturing fluids, or that would impose higher
taxes, fees or royalties on natural gas production. Moreover, public debate over hydraulic fracturing
and shale gas production has been increasing, and has resulted in delays of well permits in some areas.
In 2010, a committee of the U.S. House
of Representatives undertook investigations into hydraulic fracturing practices involving the use of diesel fuel in hydraulic
fracturing fluids, including requesting information from various field services companies including us. We responded to that
request and have received no further communication from the committee with regard to that investigation. However, on
January 31, 2011, Representative Henry Waxman and other members of Congress wrote to the EPA asserting that various companies,
including us, had engaged in hydraulic fracturing operations requiring a permit without obtaining such a permit. We have no
knowledge as to whether or how the EPA will respond to that letter.
Increased regulation and attention
given to the hydraulic fracturing process could lead to greater opposition, including litigation, to oil and gas production
activities using hydraulic fracturing techniques. Additional legislation or regulation could also lead to operational delays
or increased operating costs in the production of oil and natural gas, including from the developing shale plays, incurred by
our customers or could make it more difficult to perform hydraulic fracturing. The adoption of any federal, state or local
laws or the implementation of regulations or ordinances restricting or increasing the costs of hydraulic fracturing could
potentially increase our costs of operations and cause a decrease in the completion of new oil and natural gas wells and an
associated decrease in demand for our well servicing activities, any or all of which could adversely affect our financial
position, results of operations and cash flows.
Potential listing of species as endangered under
the federal Endangered Species Act could result in increased costs and new operating restrictions or delays on our oil and natural
gas exploration and production customers, which could adversely reduce the amount of contract drilling services that we provide to
such customers.
The federal Endangered Species Act, referred
to as the ESA, and analogous state laws regulate a variety of activities, including oil and gas development, which could have an
adverse effect on species listed as threatened or endangered under the ESA or their habitats. The designation of previously
unidentified endangered or threatened species could cause oil and natural gas exploration and production operators to incur
additional costs or become subject to operating delays, restrictions or bans in affected areas, which impacts could adversely
reduce the amount of drilling activities in affected areas, including support services that we provide to such operators under
our contract drilling services segment. Numerous species have been listed or proposed for protected status in areas in which we
provide or could in the future provide field services. For instance, the Sand Dune Lizard, referred to as Lizard, a small
lizard found in southeastern New Mexico and west Texas, an area where we provide a significant level of contract drilling services
to oil and natural gas exploration and production operators, was proposed for listing as an endangered species under the ESA in
December 2010 by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, also referred to as the FWS. The lesser prairie chicken, sage grouse and
certain wildflower species, among others, are also species that have been or are being considered for protected status under the
ESA and whose range can coincide with oil and natural gas production activities. The presence of protected species in areas where
operators whom we provide contract drilling services conduct exploration and production operations could impair such operators
ability to timely complete well drilling and development and, consequently, adversely affect the amount of contract drilling or
other field services that we provided to such operators, which reduction of services could have a significant adverse effect on
our results of operations and financial position.
We are subject to environmental, health and safety laws and regulations that may expose us
to significant liabilities for penalties, damages or costs of remediation or compliance.
Our operations are subject to federal, regional, state and local laws and regulations
relating to protection of natural resources and the environment, health and safety aspects of our
operations and waste management, including the transportation and disposal of waste and other
materials. These laws and regulations may impose numerous obligations on our operations, including
the acquisition of permits to conduct regulated activities, the incurrence of capital expenditures
to mitigate or prevent releases of materials from our facilities, the imposition of substantial
liabilities for pollution resulting from our operations and the application of specific health and
safety criteria addressing worker protection. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations
could result in investigations such as the investigation described in note 6 of the notes to our
unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q,
restrictions or orders suspending well operations, the assessment of administrative, civil and
criminal penalties, the revocation of permits and the issuance of corrective action orders, any of
which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
There is inherent risk of environmental costs and liabilities in our business as a result
of our handling of petroleum hydrocarbons and oilfield and industrial wastes, air emissions and
wastewater discharges related to our operations, and historical industry operations and waste
disposal practices. Our fluid services segment includes disposal operations into injection wells
that pose risks of environmental liability, including leakage from the wells to surface or
subsurface soils, surface water or groundwater. Some environmental laws and regulations may impose
strict liability, which means that in some situations, we could be exposed to liability as a result
of our conduct that was without fault or lawful at the time it occurred or as a result of the
conduct of, or conditions caused by, prior operators or other third parties. Clean-up costs and
other damages arising as a result of environmental laws and costs associated with changes in
environmental laws and regulations could be substantial and could have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition and results of operations.
Laws protecting the environment generally have become more stringent over time and are
expected to continue to do so, which could lead to material increases in costs for future
environmental compliance and remediation. The modification or interpretation of existing laws or
regulations, or the adoption of new laws or regulations, could curtail exploratory or developmental
drilling for oil and natural gas and could limit well servicing opportunities. We may not be able
to recover some or any of our costs of compliance with these laws and regulations from insurance.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
The following table summarizes stock repurchase activity for the three months ended June 30,
2011:
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | ||||||||||||||||
Total Number of | Approximate Dollar Value | |||||||||||||||
Shares Purchased as | of Shares that May Yet | |||||||||||||||
Total Number of | Average Price Paid | Part of Publicly | be Purchased Under | |||||||||||||
Period | Shares Purchased (1) | per Share | Announced Program | the Program | ||||||||||||
April 1 April 30 |
590 | $ | 24.76 | | $ | | ||||||||||
May 1 May 31 |
1,129 | $ | 27.52 | | $ | | ||||||||||
June 1 June 30 |
| $ | | | $ | | ||||||||||
Total |
1,719 | $ | 26.57 | | $ | |
(1) | These shares were repurchased from various employees to provide such employees the cash amounts necessary to pay certain tax liabilities associated with the vesting of restricted shares owned by them. The shares were repurchased on various dates based on the closing price per share on the date of repurchase. |
40
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibit | ||
No. | Description | |
3.1*
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated September 22, 2005. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-127517), filed on September 28, 2005) | |
3.2*
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, effective as of March 9, 2010. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on March 15, 2010) | |
4.1*
|
Specimen Stock Certificate representing common stock of the Company. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-127517), filed on November 4, 2005) | |
4.2*
|
Indenture dated April 12, 2006, among the Company, the guarantors party thereto, and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on April 13, 2006) | |
4.3*
|
Form of 7.125% Senior Note due 2016. (Included in the Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on April 13, 2006) | |
4.4*
|
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of July 14, 2006 to Indenture dated as of April 12, 2006 among the Company as Issuer, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on July 20, 2006) | |
4.5*
|
Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 26, 2007 and effective as of March 7, 2007 to Indenture dated as of April 12, 2006 among the Company as Issuer, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and the Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No 001-32693), filed on May 1, 2007) | |
4.6*
|
Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 26, 2007 to Indenture dated as of April 12, 2006 among the Company as Issuer, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and the Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No 001-32693), filed on May 1, 2007) | |
4.7*
|
Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 9, 2009 to Indenture dated as of April 12, 2006 among the Company as Issuer, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on March 9, 2009) | |
4.8*
|
Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of July 23, 2009 to Indenture dated as of April 12, 2006 among the Company as Issuer, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on March 1, 2010) | |
4.9*
|
Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 22, 2010 to Indenture dated as of April 12, 2006, by and among Basic Energy Services, Inc. as Issuer, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. as trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on December 22, 2010) | |
4.10*
|
Indenture dated as of February 15, 2011, among Basic Energy Services, Inc. as Issuer, the Guarantors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on February 18, 2011) | |
4.11*
|
Form of 7.75% Senior Note due 2019. (Included as Exhibit A to Exhibit 4.2 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on February 18, 2011) | |
4.12*
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of February 15, 2011, by and among Basic, the Guarantors named therein and the initial purchasers party thereto. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on February 18, 2011) | |
4.13*
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of June 13, 2011, by and among Basic, the Guarantors named therein and the initial purchasers party thereto. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on June 13, 2011) | |
10.1*
|
First Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Basic Energy Services, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K/A (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on June 1, 2011) | |
10.2*
|
Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement, dated as of June 7, 2011, by and among Basic as Borrower, the lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, a swing line lender and l/c issuer. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on June 7, 2011) | |
10.3*
|
Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 15, 2011, by and among Basic as Borrower, the lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, a swing line lender and l/c issuer. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on July 21, 2011) | |
10.4*
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of July 6, 2011, by and among Maverick Stimulation Company, LLC, Maverick Coil Tubing Services, LLC, MCM Holdings, LLC, Maverick Thru-Tubing, LLC, The Maverick Companies, LLC, Maverick Solutions, LLC, MSM Leasing, LLC and the sellers listed therein and Basic Energy Services, L.P. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on July 11, 2011) |
41
Exhibit | ||
No. | Description | |
31.1#
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act | |
31.2#
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act | |
32.1#
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.2#
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
101.CAL#
|
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document | |
101.DEF#
|
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document | |
101.INS#
|
XBRL Instance Document | |
101.LAB#
|
XBRL Labels Linkbase Document | |
101.PRE#
|
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document | |
101.SCH#
|
XBRL Schema Document |
* | Incorporated by reference | |
# | Filed with this report |
42
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
BASIC ENERGY SERVICES, INC. |
||||
By : | /s/ Kenneth V. Huseman | |||
Name: | Kenneth V. Huseman | |||
Title: | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) |
|||
By: | /s/ Alan Krenek | |||
Name: | Alan Krenek | |||
Title: | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) | |||
Date: July 25, 2011
43
Exhibit Index
Exhibit | ||
No. | Description | |
3.1*
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated September 22, 2005. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-127517), filed on September 28, 2005) | |
3.2*
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, effective as of March 9, 2010. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on March 15, 2010) | |
4.1*
|
Specimen Stock Certificate representing common stock of the Company. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (SEC File No. 333-127517), filed on November 4, 2005) | |
4.2*
|
Indenture dated April 12, 2006, among the Company, the guarantors party thereto, and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on April 13, 2006) | |
4.3*
|
Form of 7.125% Senior Note due 2016. (Included in the Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on April 13, 2006) | |
4.4*
|
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of July 14, 2006 to Indenture dated as of April 12, 2006 among the Company as Issuer, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on July 20, 2006) | |
4.5*
|
Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 26, 2007 and effective as of March 7, 2007 to Indenture dated as of April 12, 2006 among the Company as Issuer, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and the Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No 001-32693), filed on May 1, 2007) | |
4.6*
|
Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 26, 2007 to Indenture dated as of April 12, 2006 among the Company as Issuer, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and the Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No 001-32693), filed on May 1, 2007) | |
4.7*
|
Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 9, 2009 to Indenture dated as of April 12, 2006 among the Company as Issuer, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on March 9, 2009) | |
4.8*
|
Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of July 23, 2009 to Indenture dated as of April 12, 2006 among the Company as Issuer, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on March 1, 2010) | |
4.9*
|
Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 22, 2010 to Indenture dated as of April 12, 2006, by and among Basic Energy Services, Inc. as Issuer, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. as trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on December 22, 2010) | |
4.10*
|
Indenture dated as of February 15, 2011, among Basic Energy Services, Inc. as Issuer, the Guarantors named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on February 18, 2011) |
44
Exhibit | ||
No. | Description | |
4.11*
|
Form of 7.75% Senior Note due 2019. (Included as Exhibit A to Exhibit 4.2 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on February 18, 2011) | |
4.12*
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of February 15, 2011, by and among Basic, the Guarantors named therein and the initial purchasers party thereto. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on February 18, 2011) | |
4.13*
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of June 13, 2011, by and among Basic, the Guarantors named therein and the initial purchasers party thereto. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on June 13, 2011) | |
10.1*
|
First Amendment to Fourth Amended and Restated Basic Energy Services, Inc. 2003 Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K/A (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on June 1, 2011) | |
10.2*
|
Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement, dated as of June 7, 2011, by and among Basic as Borrower, the lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, a swing line lender and l/c issuer. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on June 7, 2011) | |
10.3*
|
Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 15, 2011, by and among Basic as Borrower, the lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, a swing line lender and l/c issuer. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on July 21, 2011) | |
10.4*
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of July 6, 2011, by and among Maverick Stimulation Company, LLC, Maverick Coil Tubing Services, LLC, MCM Holdings, LLC, Maverick Thru-Tubing, LLC, The Maverick Companies, LLC, Maverick Solutions, LLC, MSM Leasing, LLC and the sellers listed therein and Basic Energy Services, L.P. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K (SEC File No. 001-32693), filed on July 11, 2011) | |
31.1#
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act | |
31.2#
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Exchange Act | |
32.1#
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.2#
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
101.CAL#
|
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document | |
101.DEF#
|
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document | |
101.INS#
|
XBRL Instance Document | |
101.LAB#
|
XBRL Labels Linkbase Document | |
101.PRE#
|
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document | |
101.SCH#
|
XBRL Schema Document |
* | Incorporated by reference | |
# | Filed with this report |
45