BBHC, INC. - Quarter Report: 2010 September (Form 10-Q)

f10q0910_magnegas.htm

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

______________

FORM 10-Q

______________

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______________ to ______________

Commission File No.000-51883

______________

MagneGas Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

______________

Delaware		26-0250418
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

150 Rainville Rd Tarpon Springs, FL 34689		34689
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(Former name, former address, if changed since last report)

Tel: (727) 934-3448

(Registrant’s telephone number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports), and (2)has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o	Non-accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer o (do not check if smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Yes o No x

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of November 15, 2010: 124,484,972 shares of common stock.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page Number
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements	1
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation	13
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	16
Item 4T.	Controls and Procedures	16

PART II -OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings.	18
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	18
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.	18
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities.	18
Item 4.	Removed and Reserved.	18
Item 5.	Other Information.	18
Item 6.	Exhibits	18
		18
SIGNATURES		19

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Financial Statements

MagneGas Corporation

As of September 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 (audited)

And for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 (unaudited) and 2009 (unaudited)

Contents

Financial Statements:	Page Number

Balance Sheets September 30, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009 (audited)	2

Statements of Operations (unaudited)	3

Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)	4

Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)	5-10

MagneGas Corporation

BALANCE SHEETS


	September 30,			December 31,
	2010			2009
	(unaudited)			(audited)
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash	$	1,700,135		$	7,338
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,149 and $0, respectively		10,515			2,399
Inventory, at cost		615,333			8,381
Prepaid and other current assets		125,000			-
Total Current Assets		2,213,464			18,118

Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $6,240 and $375, respectively		39,470			22,125

Deferred Tax Asset		436,400			472,900
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $90,928 and $54,578, respectively		636,072			672,422
Investment in joint ventures		490,410			-
TOTAL ASSETS	$	4,053,335		$	1,185,565


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	235,071		$	94,577
Accrued expenses		22,338			77,395
Deferred revenue and customer deposits		668,327			100,000
Due to affiliate		10,000			10,000
Note payable to related party		18,837			140,087
TOTAL LIABILITIES		954,573			422,059


Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock: $0.001 par; 10,000,000 authorized; 2,000 issued and outstanding		2			2
Common stock: $0.001 par; 900,000,000 authorized; 123,290,209 and 105,954,395 issued and outstanding, respectively		123,290			105,954
Additional paid-in capital		5,155,638			2,909,518
Issued and unearned stock compensation		(53,333	)		(68,333	)
Accumulated deficit		(2,126,835	)		(2,183,635	)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY		3,098,762			763,506

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY	$	4,053,335		$	1,185,565

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

MagneGas Corporation

STATEMENTS OF OPERATION

For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009

(unaudited)


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	(unaudited)						(unaudited)
	2010			2009			2010			2009


Revenue	$	444,232		$	1,300		$	1,942,606		$	5,351

Cost of Sales		183,308			888			724,299			4,436

Gross Profit		260,924			412			1,218,307			915

Operating Expenses:
Advertising		18,942			17,927			38,827			52,699
Selling		15,962			161			192,280			29,801
Professional: technical		75,770			9,607			148,995			21,126
Professional: legal and accounting		22,351			56,069			60,014			97,668
Rent and overhead		30,563			30,607			54,321			55,830
Office and administration		53,259			18,734			208,515			23,793
Investor Relations		23,386			1,289			61,795			6,972
Stock-based compensation		51,800			343,928			237,876			570,256
Research and development		56,310			4,093			78,460			19,246
Depreciation and Amortization		14,361			12,116			42,215			36,350
Total Operating Expenses		362,704			494,531			1,123,298			913,741

Operating Income (Loss)		(101,780	)		(494,119	)		95,009			(912,826	)

Other (Income) and Expense
Interest expense		9			1,367			1,709			4,815
Total Other (Income) Expenses		9			1,367			1,709			4,815

Net Loss before tax benefit		(101,789	)		(495,486	)		93,300			(917,641	)
Provision for Income Taxes		(38,300	)		-			36,500			-
Net Income (Loss)	$	(63,489	)	$	(495,486	)	$	56,800		$	(917,641	)


Loss per share:
Basic	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.01	)
Diluted	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.01	)
Weighted average common shares:
Basic		115,562,976			103,036,648			110,456,553			101,498,630
Diluted		116,757,739			104,018,911			111,636,994			101,975,133

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

MagneGas Corporation
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
(unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2010			2009

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

Net income (loss)	$	56,800		$	(917,641	)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		42,215			36,350
Stock compensation		237,876			570,256
Waiver of related party expenses		16,830			16,830
Loss on sale of asset		-			10,000
Bad debts		-			300
Deferred income taxes		36,500			-
Changes in operating assets:
Accounts Receivable		(8,116	)		732
Inventory		(606,952	)		(3,895	)
Prepaid & other current assets		(125,000	)		-
Accounts Payable		140,494			(28,488	)
Accrued Expenses		(55,057	)		26,617
Deferred revenue and customer deposits		101,667			100,000
Total adjustments to net income		(219,543	)		728,702
Net cash (used in) operating activities		(162,743	)		(188,939	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Acquisition of equipment		(23,210	)		-
Net cash flows (used in) investing activities		(23,210	)		-

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Advances from related party		14,750			(31,135	)
Proceeds from note payable to related party		22,000			105,000
Repayments on notes payable from related party		(158,000	)		(30,000	)
Interest accrued on affiliate notes and advances		-			(6,406	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		2,000,000			158,000
Net cash flows provided by investing activities		1,878,750			195,459


Net increase in cash		1,692,797			6,520
Cash - beginning balance		7,338			160
CASH BALANCE - END OF PERIOD	$	1,700,135		$	6,680


Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information and non cash investing and financing activities:
Interest paid	$	-		$	-
Taxes paid	$	-		$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

MagneGas Corporation

(Previously a Development Stage Enterprise)

Notes to Financial Statements

For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009

1. Background Information

MagneGas Corporation (the “Company”) was organized in the state of Delaware on December 9, 2005. The Company was originally organized under the name 4307, Inc, for the purpose of locating and negotiating with a business entity for a combination. On April 2, 2007 all the issued and outstanding shares of 4307, Inc. were purchased and the Company name was changed to MagneGas Corporation.

The Company’s operating plan and mission is to provide services in cleaning and converting contaminated liquid waste into fuel. A process has been developed which transforms contaminated waste through a proprietary incandescent machine. The result of the product is to carbonize waste for normal disposal. A byproduct of this process is to produce a green alternative to natural gas. The patented proprietary technology is owned by the Company.

The Company owns all relevant patents and intellectual property on the Technology for North, South and Central America. MagneGas Corporation also has minority ownership interests in the Greater China, European and African markets. The trading and manufacturing rights for other regions of the world are owned by other entities separate and distinct from MagneGas Corporation. However, the Company is seeking to expand globally through Distributorship and Joint Venture arrangements as they become available.

2. Going Concern and Business Development

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern.

The Company, in prior periods, presented financial statements as a development stage enterprise. In the initial years the Company devoted substantially all of its efforts to raising capital, planning and implementing the principal operations. During the development stage, the Company incurred significant net operating losses and accumulated deficits.

The Company may continue to incur significant operating losses and to generate negative cash flow from operating activities. The Company’s ability to eliminate operating losses and to generate positive cash flow from operations in the future will depend upon a variety of factors, many of which it is unable to control. The key factors that are not within the Company’s control and that may have a direct bearing on operating results include, but are not limited to, increased acceptance of the Company’s business plan, the ability to raise capital in the future, the ability to expand its customer base, and the ability to hire key employees to build and manufacture our proprietary machines and provide services. There may be other risks and circumstances that management may be unable to predict.

The Company may still require additional capital to be derived from future financing activities such as subsequent offerings of its common stock or debt financing in order to operate and grow the business. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in raising such capital.

Management believes that the Company has established the primary business development plan as it has delivered its first unit and is in process of manufacturing additional units for future sale. As a technology based company, there remains research and development activities to further the technology and improve processes for manufacturing. Management also believes the current status, from the sale of the production unit, increasing sales from the metal cutting fuel, and license agreements through joint ventures, there has been significant funding to support future efforts.

The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The significant accounting policies followed are:

Basis of Presentation

In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of (a) the result of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009; (b) the financial position at September 30, 2010, and (c) cash flows for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, have been made.

Use of Estimates

The Company prepares its financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. These principals require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management believes that these estimates are reasonable and have been discussed with the Board of Directors; however, actual results could differ from those estimates.

Variable Interest Entities

The Company considers the consolidation of entities to which the usual condition (ownership of a majority voting interest) of consolidation does not apply, focusing on controlling financial interests that may be achieved through arrangements that do not involve voting interest. If an enterprise holds a majority of the variable interests of an entity, it would be considered the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is generally required to consolidate assets, liabilities and non-controlling interests at fair value (or at historical cost if the entity is a related party) and subsequently account for the variable interest as if it were consolidated based on a majority voting interest. The Company has investments in joint ventures that are in development of the MagneGas technology, however the Company is not identified as a primary beneficiary; therefore no consolidation is required and the investments are listed at their cost.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) introduced a framework for measuring fair value and expanded required disclosure about fair value measurements of assets and liabilities. The Company adopted the standard for those financial assets and liabilities as of the beginning of the 2008 fiscal year and the impact of adoption was not significant. FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (ASC 820) defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

●	Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

●

Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates); and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

●	Level 3 - Inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of September 30, 2010. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. These financial instruments include accounts receivable, other current assets, accounts payable, accrued compensation and accrued expenses. The fair value of the Company’s notes payable is estimated based on current rates that would be available for debt of similar terms which is not significantly different from its stated value.

The Company applied ASC 820 for all non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. The adoption of ASC 820 for non-financial assets and liabilities did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash accounts are maintained with a major financial institution in the United States. Deposits with this bank may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits. Generally, these deposits may be redeemed on demand and, therefore, bear minimal risk. The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable, Credit

Accounts receivable consist of amounts due for the delivery of MagneGas sales to customers. An allowance for doubtful accounts is considered to be established for any amounts that may not be recoverable, which is based on an analysis of the Company’s customer credit worthiness, and current economic trends. Based on management’s review of accounts receivable, no allowance for doubtful accounts was considered necessary. Receivables are determined to be past due, based on payment terms of original invoices. The Company does not typically charge interest on past due receivables.

Revenue Recognition

The Company generates revenue through two processes: (1) Sale of MagneGas fuel for metal cutting and (2) Sale of its Plasma Arc Flow units.

●	Revenue for metal-cutting fuel is recognized when shipments are made to customers. The Company recognizes a sale when the product has been shipped and risk of loss has passed to the customer.

●

Revenue generated from sales of its production unit is recognized on a percentage of completion, based on the progress during manufacturing of the unit. Our machine is a significant investment and generally requires a 6 to 9 month production cycle. During the course of building a unit the actual costs are tracked to our cost estimates and revenue is proportionately recognized during the process. Significant deposits are required before production. These deposits are classified as customer deposits. During our production, costs and progress earnings are accumulated and included in “Costs and earnings” as an asset.

Long-Lived Assets

Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method over estimated useful lives (3-7 years). Intellectual property assets are stated at their fair value acquisition cost. Amortization of intellectual property assets is calculated by the straight line method over their estimated useful lives (15 years). Historical costs are reviewed and evaluated for their net realizable value of the assets. The carrying amount of all long-lived assets is evaluated periodically to determine if adjustment to the depreciation and amortization period or the unamortized balance is warranted. Based upon its most recent analysis, the Company believes that no impairment of property and equipment existed at December 31, 2009.

Long-lived assets such as property, equipment and identifiable intangibles are reviewed for impairment whenever facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. When required impairment losses on assets to be held and used are recognized based on the fair value of the asset. The fair value is determined based on estimates of future cash flows, market value of similar assets, if available, or independent appraisals, if required. If the carrying amount of the long-lived asset is not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between the carrying amount and fair value of the asset. When fair values are not available, the Company estimates fair value using the expected future cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk associated with the recovery of the assets. We did not recognize any impairment losses for any periods presented.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost or market, which approximates actual cost. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method. Inventory is comprised of filled cylinders of MagneGas and accessories (regulators and tips) available for sale and accumulated costs incurred in the manufacturing process of units held for future sales.

The Company is manufacturing additional units for sale. Each unit is assigned a project number and the costs are accumulated, until delivered.

Stock Based Compensation

The Company issues restricted stock to consultants for various services Cost for these transactions are measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The value of the common stock is measured at the earlier of (i) the date at which a firm commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached or (ii) the date at which the counterparty’s performance is complete. The Company recognized consulting expenses and a corresponding increase to additional paid-in-capital related to stock issued for services. Stock compensation for the periods presented were issued to consultants for past services provided, accordingly, all shares issued are fully vested, and there is no unrecognized compensation associated with these transactions. In May 2008 the Company entered into a consulting agreement for services to be rendered over a five year period. The consulting expense is to be recognized ratably over the requisite service period.

Shipping Costs

The Company includes shipping costs and freight-in costs in cost of goods sold. Total freight-in included in cost of sales.

Advertising Costs

The costs of advertising are expensed as incurred. Advertising expenses are included in the Company’s operating expenses. Advertising expense was $18,942, $17,927, $38,827 and $52,699 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Research and Development

The Company expenses research and development costs when incurred. Research and development costs include engineering and laboratory testing of product and outputs. Indirect costs related to research and developments are allocated based on percentage usage to the research and development.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purpose, referred to as temporary differences. Deferred tax assets and liabilities at the end of each period are determined using the currently enacted tax rates applied to taxable income in the periods in which the deferred tax assets and liabilities are expected to be settled or realized.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share calculations are determined by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings (loss) per share calculations are determined by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares. The Company has issued options to several investors, upon their purchase of shares. Options, who’s strike price is less than the current market value, are considered common stock equivalents and are included in dilutive earnings per share.

4. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the FASB issued new accounting guidance that established the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”), as the single source of authoritative GAAP to be applied by nongovernmental entities, except for the rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws, which are sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The FASB will no longer issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts; instead the FASB will issue Accounting Standards Updates. Accounting Standards Updates will not be authoritative in their own right as they will only serve to update the Codification. These changes and the Codification itself do not change GAAP. This new guidance became effective for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. Other than the manner in which new accounting guidance is referenced, the Codification did not have an effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06 regarding fair value measurements and disclosures and improvement in the disclosure about fair value measurements. This ASU requires additional disclosures regarding significant transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 of fair value measurements, including a description of the reasons for the transfers. Further, this ASU requires additional disclosures for the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, requiring presentation of information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the reconciliation for fair value measurements. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the impact of this ASU; however, we do not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on our financial statements.

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09 regarding subsequent events and amendments to certain recognition and disclosure requirements. Under this ASU, a public company that is a SEC filer, as defined, is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. This ASU is effective upon the issuance of this ASU. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on our financial statements.

In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-18 regarding improving comparability by eliminating diversity in practice about the treatment of modifications of loans accounted for within pools under Subtopic 310-30 – Receivable – Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality (“Subtopic 310-30”). Furthermore, the amendments clarify guidance about maintaining the integrity of a pool as the unit of accounting for acquired loans with credit deterioration. Loans accounted for individually under Subtopic 310-30 continue to be subject to the troubled debt restructuring accounting provisions within Subtopic 310-40, Receivables—Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors. The amendments in this Update are effective for modifications of loans accounted for within pools under Subtopic 310-30 occurring in the first interim or annual period ending on or after July 15, 2010. The amendments are to be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact of this ASU; however, we do not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on our financial statements.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB (including its EITF), the AICPA, and the SEC did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future financial statements.

5. Inventory

Inventory primarily consists of work-in-process. The Company is currently manufacturing 3 refineries for future sales.

6. Long Lived Assets

Equipment consists of:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
Equipment	$	41,335	$	18,125
Truck		4,375		4,375
		45,710		22,500
Less accumulated depreciation		6,240		375
	$	39,470	$	22,125

Depreciation of equipment was $2,244, $0, $5,865 and $0 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Intellectual property:

The Company owns intellectual property, which it is amortizing on a straight-line basis over the assets useful life. The Company assesses fair market value for any impairment to the carrying values. As of December 31, 2009 management concluded that there was no impairment to the intangible assets.

	September 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
Intellectual property	$	727,000	$	727,000
Less accumulated amortization		90,928		54,578
	$	636,072	$	672,422

Future amortization through December 31,:
2010	$	12,117
2011		48,467
2012		48,467
2013		48,467
2014		48,467
2015 and thereafter		430,087
	$	636,072

Amortization of the intangible assets was $12,116, $12,116, $36,350 and $36,350 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Management periodically reviews the valuation of this asset for potential impairments. Consideration of various risks to the valuation and potential impairment includes, but is not limited to: (a) the technology’s acceptance in the marketplace and our ability to attain projected forecasts of revenue (discounted cash flow of projections); (b) competition of alternative solutions; and (c) federal and state laws which may prohibit the use of our production machinery as currently designed. Management has not impaired this asset, to date, and does not anticipate any negative impact from known current business developments. Management continuously measures the marketplace, potential revenue developments and competitive developments in the scientific industry.

7. Investment in Joint Ventures

On June 25, 2010, the Company entered into agreement with a Belgium company, whereby 250,000 shares of MagneGas Corporation’s common stock and territorial license rights were exchanged for a 20% interest in MagneGas Europe. The Company valued the investment in the Joint Venture at the fair market value of the shares issued ($23,750). The Company does not have effective or beneficial control over the European entity and is to account for the investment under the Equity Method.

On June 28, 2010, the Company entered into agreement with DDI Industries, a China company, in formation of MagneGas China. The Company is to provide mechanical drawings (for complete construction), computer programs, license of patents (Greater China Region), trademarks, etc. of the Plasma Arc Flow Recyclers to the new entity in exchange for a $2 million investment in MagneGas Corporation (received as of September 30, 2010; subscription at a share price of $0.135 or 14,814,814 common shares) and 20% share in MagneGas China. The Company’s investment has been valued at $466,660, a mutually agreed amount for the technology license. The MagneGas China entity has been funded in cash for an amount which reflects the intellectual property’s value. The Company does not have effective or beneficial control over the China entity and is to account for the investment under the Equity Method.

Our investments in joint ventures are considered as Level 3, as defined in FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (ASC 820), and management considers alternative methods for valuing these investments to determine if there would be impairment to the current carrying value, currently our cost basis.

8. Income Tax

Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes consists of the following:

	2009		2008
Current Tax Provision (Benefit)	$	-	$	-
Deferred Tax(Benefit) Provision		36,500		-
Total Tax (Benefit) Provision	$	36,500	$	-

Deferred Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes are the result of timing differences between book and tax basis of certain assets and liabilities, timing of income and expense recognition of certain items and net operating loss carry-forwards.

The Company assesses temporary differences resulting from different treatments of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are recorded in our balance sheets. The Company evaluates the ability to realize its deferred tax assets and assesses the need for a valuation allowance on an ongoing basis. In evaluating its deferred tax assets, the Company considers whether it is more likely than not that the deferred income tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets depends upon generating sufficient future taxable income prior to the expiration of the tax attributes. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance the Company must project future levels of taxable income. This assessment requires significant judgment. The Company examined the evidence related to a recent history of tax losses, the economic conditions in which it operates recent organizational changes, its forecasts, its projections and considers if those estimates satisfy the realization standard. The Company will continue to evaluate its deferred tax assets to determine whether any changes in circumstances could affect the realization of their future benefit.

The Company had not previously recognized an income tax benefit for its operating losses generated since inception through December 31, 2008 based on uncertainties concerning its ability to generate taxable income in future periods of which, at the time, the realization could not be considered more likely than not. Based on current events management has re-assessed the valuation allowance and the recognition of its deferred tax assets attributable to the net operating losses, however, based on the Company’s history of losses and other negative evidence resulting in the allowance, no income tax benefit will be recognized for prior periods. The tax benefit for the prior periods, in the amount of approximately $348,800, arising from operating losses as a start-up company and other temporary differences, has been off-set by an equal valuation allowance.

The following is a schedule of the deferred tax assets and liabilities as of September 30, 2010 and 2009:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2010		2009
Deferred Tax Assets
Net Operating Loss Carry Forwards	$	436,400	$	472,900

Deferred Tax Liabilities
Total Deferred Tax Assets (Liabilities)	$	-	$	-

Net Deferred Tax Asset (Liabilities)	$	436,400	$	472,900

Management believes that the Company has matured and product acceptance will generate the revenues and achieve a level of profitability creating taxable income of approximately $1,514,000 which would fully utilize the recognized deferred tax assets.

Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, these losses can be carried forward twenty years. As of December 31, 2009 the Company has net operating loss carry forwards expiring in the years 2027 through 2029.

The adoption of provisions, required by Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) No. 740, did not result in any adjustments.

The Company is currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service for the years ending December 31, 2005 through 2008. The Company state income tax returns are open to audit under the statute of limitations for the years ending December 31, 2005 through 2008.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to income taxes in income tax expense. The Company had incurred no penalties and interest for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.

9. Equity

The company has two classifications of stock:

Preferred Stock includes 10,000,000 shares authorized at a par value of $0.001. Preferred Stock has been issued as Series A Preferred Stock. Preferred Stock has liquidation and dividend rights over Common Stock, which is not in excess of its par value. The preferred stock has no conversion rights or mandatory redemption features. There have been 2,000 shares of Preferred Stock issued to an entity controlled by Dr. Ruggero Santilli and other members of the Board of Director. Each share of Preferred Stock is entitled to 100,000 votes.

Common Stock includes 900,000,000 shares authorized at a par value of $0.001. The holders of Common Stock and the equivalent Preferred Stock, voting together, shall appoint the members of the Board of the Directors. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote.

During the nine month period ending September 30, 2010, the Company issued 2,271,000 shares to consultants and other service providers, valued at the fair market value of the shares at the time of the grant, in the amount of $220,768.

The use of an initial small production refinery has been contributed by Dr. Ruggero Santilli, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Scientist and Chairman of the Board. The computed fair value of this month-to-month rental agreement is $1,870 per month and has been charged to equipment rental expense in the operating expenses. To reflect the contributed value, the corresponding entry has been charged to additional paid in capital, and is included in the statement of stockholders’ equity.

10. Related Party Transactions

On December 28, 2008 the Company acquired all relevant patents and intellectual property, which includes all possible inventions, discoveries and intellectual right of the MagneGas Technology, for 30,000,000 common shares with a market value of $727,000 at the time of the purchase option, for the MagneGas technology for the United States from a company, Hyfuels, Inc., related by common management. The Company purchased this technology from HyFuels, Inc. for exclusive rights to the technology for North, South and Central America. Dr. Ruggero Santilli, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and Chief Scientist of MagneGas Corporation, is also the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Scientist and President of Hyfuels, Inc. so as to expedite the patent work on behalf of both MagneGas Corporation and Hyfuels, Inc. It should be noted that Dr. Santilli is not and never has been a stockholder of Hyfuels, Inc., and was lending his knowledge and expertise for the mutually beneficial advancement of this technology and that no further relationship exists between the two parties.

At various times the Company received advances from a shareholder for one of a small number of outstanding unsecured promissory notes. All funds are at the same terms of the original shareholder note. These promissory notes have no repayment date; however they are payable within 30 days of written demand. Payment is to include accrued simple interest at 4%. As of September 30, 2010, the principle balance on the promissory notes is $1,900. The notes have accrued interest, unpaid, in the amount of $9,600, which is included in accrued expenses.

Beginning April 2008 the Company entered into a month-to-month lease, at a monthly rate of $2,500 per month for facilities to occupy approximately 3,000 square feet of a 6,000 square foot building and the use of certain equipment and utilities, as needed. The facility allows for expansion needs. The lease is held by a Company that is effectively controlled by Dr. Santilli.

The use of an initial small production refinery has been contributed by Dr. Ruggero Santilli, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Scientist, and Chairman of the Board. The computed fair value of this month-to-month rental agreement is $1,870 per month and has been charged to equipment rental expense in the operating expenses, beginning in July 2008. To reflect the contributed value, the corresponding entry has been charged to additional paid in capital, and is included in the statement of stockholders’ equity. Total contributed value was $5,610 and $11,220 for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

The Company entered into an agreement to acquire a 20% ownership of Magnegas Europe. This Company is related by common management. The CEO of Magnegas Europe, Ermanno Santilli is also the Vice President of Magnegas Corporation and is the son of Dr. Ruggero M. Santilli. There are no other related party transactions, joint venture or royalty agreements. The amounts and terms of the above transactions may not necessarily be indicative of the amounts and terms that would have been incurred had comparable transactions been entered into with independent third parties.

11. Contingencies

From time to time the Company may be a party to litigation matters involving claims against the Company. The Company operates with waste, hazardous material and within a highly regulated industry, which may lend itself to legal matters. Management believes that there are no current matters that would have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation or Plan of Operation.

Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward Looking Statements

The information contained in Item 2 contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Actual results may materially differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain risks and uncertainties set forth in this report. Although management believes that the assumptions made and expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, there is no assurance that the underlying assumptions will, in fact, prove to be correct or that actual results will not be different from expectations expressed in this report.

We desire to take advantage of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. This filing contains a number of forward-looking statements which reflect management’s current views and expectations with respect to our business, strategies, products, future results and events, and financial performance. All statements made in this filing other than statements of historical fact, including statements addressing operating performance, events, or developments which management expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future, including statements related to distributor channels, volume growth, revenues, profitability, new products, adequacy of funds from operations, statements expressing general optimism about future operating results, and non-historical information, are forward looking statements. In particular, the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “may,” variations of such words, and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements, and their absence does not mean that the statement is not forward-looking. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including those discussed below. Our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from historical results as well as those expressed in, anticipated, or implied by these forward-looking statements. We do not undertake any obligation to revise these forward-looking statements to reflect any future events or circumstances.

Readers should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which are based on management’s current expectations and projections about future events, are not guarantees of future performance, are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions (including those described below), and apply only as of the date of this filing. Our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from the results expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. Factors which could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, the risks to be discussed in our Annual Report on form 10-K and in the press releases and other communications to shareholders issued by us from time to time which attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors which may affect our business. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

Overview

The Company’s operating plan and mission is to provide services in cleaning and converting contaminated waste. A process has been developed which transforms contaminated waste through a proprietary incandescent machine. The result of the product is to carbonize waste for normal disposal. A byproduct of this process is to produce a green alternative to natural gas. The patented proprietary technology is owned by the Company.

Sales of Plasma Arc Flow Units

The Company received and fulfilled its first order for a $1.9 million production unit for a China based company. Collections in the amount of $1,755,000 were received and the project was complete upon a $145,000 credit for certain equipment that was procured by the purchasing company. Additionally we have an order and deposit for a customer from the Philippines; however, due to the natural disasters sustained in this country, this order’s production has been delayed and is not expected to occur in the foreseeable future. At the close of the September 30, 2010 quarter we received a non-recourse payment of $150,000 from a Mexican company for a six-month exclusivity period. The Mexican company, per the memorandum of understanding, intends to purchase a 100kW refinery.

Metal Working Market

The Company is seeking to expand sales in the Metal Working market through the use of established industry wholesalers, trade events and media coverage in trade journals. The Company has established relationships with several fuel distributors for the sale of MagneGas in the metal working market. The Company has identified two independent sales representatives to support these relationships and is in the process of recruiting for additional sales support personnel. In addition, in February of 2010, the Company received an order for 294 cylinders of MagneGas from a company in Dubai that plans to sell the fuel in the Metal Working market for the surrounding Middle East area. The Company has completed this order. In addition, 30 cylinders of Magnegas were shipped to Australia to begin market awareness in that market. We are also negotiating with potential fuel distributors from several countries, and across the United States. At the time of the filing of this document the Company can make no assurance as to the final outcome of these negotiations.

Municipal Market

The Company has received expressed interest from several municipalities for testing of the Plasma Arc Flow system on sewage and sludge processing. The Company will expand commercially into this market after it has established its first municipal plant scale demonstration center converting sludge or sewage to fuel and other byproducts. A local municipality’s water treatment facility has agreed to set up a demonstration center and conduct plant scale testing of the MagneGas refinery. Our existing prototype equipment is being modified for the specifics required for this project. At this time we are unable to accurately estimate the volume that will be processed. Upon completion of the 12 month test the contract will be evaluated and subject to renegotiation. No date has been determined when this project is to commence and funding will be required to implement this project as per our plan of operations.

International Expansion

The Company is seeking to expand globally through the sale of equipment and the establishment of Distribution and Joint Venture arrangements. We currently have complete negotiations for joint venture agreements in China and Europe.

Business Continuation and Succession

The Company has developed and trained a team of engineers and consultants becoming expertly knowledgeable with the MagneGas technology. Our team is a consortium of academic and industrial consultants, now, throughout Europe, China and elsewhere.

Results of Operations

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009

Revenues

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 we generated revenues of $444,232 and $1,942,606, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 we generated revenues, solely from our metal cutting fuel, of $1,300 and $5,351, respectively. For our three months ended September 30, 2010, we recognized $277,147 of the $1.9 million contract for the sale of our Plasma Arc Flow unit. Our original agreement was reduced, in the amount of $145,000 for allowance for certain equipment which was to be procured by the purchaser. This adjustment had an immaterial effect on our gross profit, as the additional equipment was not a product of MagneGas’ development and the equipment had minimal mark-up from its cost. Included in the revenue was $48,333 of license fees, ratably earned over the license period. The remainder of our sales was from our metal cutting fuel sales operations. In the comparative nine month period ended September 30, 2009 we generated no sales from units and $5,351from our metal cutting fuel. The increase was due to the unit sale, of which we have completed and received payment. We completed and delivered the unit within our initial time estimates and cost budgets.

We have increased sales in our metal cutting fuel and believe that we have generated operating capital to expand our efforts and abilities to market our product in the future. We continue to experience that our marketing efforts have not generated the expected revenue we had anticipated; we believe this is due to the economy and the target market channels’ inability to commit funds for new technology and capital expenditures. We believe that our metal cutting fuel orders will increase as the economy and the building market recovers.

Operating Expenses

Operating costs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 were $362,704 and $1,123,298, respectively. Operating costs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 were $494,531 and $913,741, respectively. The increase was primarily attributable to increases in selling expenses, technical support for production, research and development. The sale of the unit incurred commissions and other selling associated costs (travel, etc). In the three months ended September 30, 2010, commissions and bonus were paid upon the full realization of the unit’s sale price. Bonus’s were approved by our Board of Directors and paid in recognition of forgoing salaries since inception.

In prior quarters, the Company had routinely used common stock as a method of payment for certain services, primarily the advertising and promotion of the technology, and to increase investor awareness. We expect to continue these arrangements, though due to a stronger operating position this method of payment may become limited to specific vendors.

During the three months ended September 30, 2010, we have received several qualified interest in our PlasmaArcFlow refinery units. We have received a $150,000 non-refundable payment from a company for a six-month period of market exclusivity for the Mexican territory. Pursuant to the memorandum of understanding (“MOU”), the Mexican company states its intention to purchase a 100 kW or greater Refinery and exclusive distribution rights for the Mexico market for an initial five-year period. The six-month option expires on February 28, 2011. If the Mexican company exercises its option to purchase, The payment will apply to the Refinery purchase price; the payment is non-refundable if the Mexican company does not exercise the option.

Net Income (Loss)

The Company’s operating results have recognized a loss in the amount of $63,489 and income in the amount of $56,800, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, comparing favorably to net losses incurred of $495,486 and $917,641, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009. We anticipate that our ability to fund future production of our units will result in lower costs, as stock-based payments result in recognition of expense in excess of what would be paid in cash.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company, with the availability of money received from our unit sale and the $2 million dollar investment, is in position to fund its operation for the near term. Previously we had financed our operations primarily through cash generated through the sale of stock through a private offering. We believe we can currently satisfy our cash requirements for the next twelve months with our current cash and expected revenues. Additionally, we may secure additional funds through our private placement of common stock as our technology is more widely accepted. Management plans to increase revenue to sustain future operational growth.

Completion of our plan of operation is subject to attaining adequate and continued revenue. We cannot assure investors that adequate revenues will be generated. In the absence of our projected revenues, we believe that we will be able to proceed with our plan of operations. Even without significant revenues within the next twelve months, based on our current cash position, we anticipate being able to continue with our present activities. Although we believe we currently are adequately financed, we may require additional financing for sales and marketing objectives to achieve our goal of sustained profit, revenue and growth.

In the event we are not successful in reaching our sustained revenue targets, we anticipate that depending on market conditions and our plan of operations, we could incur operating losses in the future. We base this expectation, in part, on the fact that we may not be able to generate enough gross profit from our services to cover our operating expenses. Consequently, there remains the possibility that the Company may not continue to operate as a going concern in the long term.

As reflected in the unaudited financial statements we have an accumulated a deficit of over $2 million dollars. Our cash flow from operations used $162,743 of cash, primarily used in the manufacturing of three refineries for future sales. The Company’s investing activities used $23,210 of cash for the acquisition of equipment; there were $0 expenditures for equipment in the comparable prior year period. Our investing activities resulted in positive cash in the amount of $1,878,750 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, primarily due to the sale of common stock in the amount of $2 million dollars (sold at fair market value of $0.135 per share), less the net repayment of $158,000 of debt. This favorably compared to the $195,459 provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, provided by the raising of cash through stock issuances ($158,000) and short-term financing by the majority shareholder (net financing in the amount of $105,000).

At September 30, 2010 the Company had $1,700,135 in cash to meet current obligations.

Management believes that current revenue generated and recent investment commitment provides the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern and fund the strategic plan.

Subsequent Events

The company is in negotiation to expand into Israel, the Middle East and other potential territories through Joint Venture agreements, royalty arrangements or intent to purchase refinery units (Mexico). These agreements are in various stages of negotiation and as of September 30, 2010, there are agreements in principle. However, the Company can make no assurance as to the final outcome of these negotiations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

We have reviewed accounting pronouncements and interpretations thereof that have effectiveness dates during the periods reported and in future periods. The Company has carefully considered the new pronouncements that alter previous generally accepted accounting principles and does not believe that any new or modified principles will have a material impact on the corporation’s reported financial position or operations in the near term. The applicability of any standard is subject to the formal review of our financial management and certain standards are under consideration. Those standards have been addressed in the notes to the unaudited financial statement and in our Annual Report, filed on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company’s significant accounting policies are presented in the Company’s notes to financial statements for the period ended September 30, 2010 and fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, which are contained in the Company’s 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The significant accounting policies that are most critical and aid in fully understanding and evaluating the reported financial results include the following:

The Company issues restricted stock to consultants for various services. Cost for these transactions are measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The value of the common stock is measured at the earlier of (i) the date at which a firm commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached or (ii) the date at which the counterparty’s performance is complete.

The Company generates revenue through two processes: (a) Sale of MagneGas fuel for metal cutting; and (b) Sale of its Plasma Arc Flow units.

Revenue for metal-cutting fuel is recognized when shipments are made to customers. The Company recognizes a sale when the product has been shipped and risk of loss has passed to the customer.

Revenue generated from sales of its production unit is recognized on a percentage of completion, based on the progress during manufacturing of the unit. Our machine is a significant investment and generally requires a 6 to 9 month production cycle. During the course of building a unit the actual costs are tracked to our cost estimates and revenue is proportionately recognized during the process. Significant deposits are required before production. These deposits are classified as customer deposits. Costs and progress earnings are accumulated and included in “Costs and earnings” as an asset.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We are a Smaller Reporting Company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

Item 4T.

Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports, filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In reaching a reasonable level of assurance, management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. In addition, the design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, a control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

As required by the SEC Rule 13a-15(b), we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

We are not currently involved in any litigation that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. There is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries or of our companies or our subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

We believe there are no changes that constitute material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s 2009 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K. We are a smaller reporting company and are not required to provide information required by this item.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

On June 22, 2010, we effectuated a Licensing Agreement with DDI Industry International Company, a Beijing, China company (“DDI”) pursuant to which we authorized the issuance of 14,814,815 shares of unregistered Common Stock to DDI in exchange for a cash payment of $2,000,000. On September 30, 2010, the Company received the final $1,000,000 payment due pursuant to the Agreement and we issued 7,407,407 shares of unregistered Common Stock were issued to DDI.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None

Item 4. Removed and Reserved.

Not Applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

On August 5, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors appointed Mr. Allen Feng as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors.

Mr Feng, Age 43, received a Bachelor’s degree in Chemical Engineering from Taiyuan University of Technology in July 1989. Mr. Feng has served as Chief Executive Officer and President of DDI Industry, International, Beijing China Since January 2005.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit Number		Exhibit Title

31.1		Certification of Dr. Ruggero Santilli pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of Luisa Ingargiola, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification of Dr. Rugerro Maria Santilli pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2		Certification of Luisa Ingargiola, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, there unto duly authorized.

	MagneGas Corporation

	By:	/s/ Dr. Ruggero Maria Santilli
		Dr. Ruggero Maria Santilli
		Chief Executive Officer

	Dated:	November 15, 2010