BBHC, INC. - Quarter Report: 2013 September (Form 10-Q)

f10q0913_magnegascorp.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______________ to ______________

Commission File Number: 000-51883

MagneGas Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		26-0250418
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

150 Rainville Rd Tarpon Springs, Florida		34689
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(727) 934-3448

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o (do not check if smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

As of November 4, 2013 there were 23,109,109 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value issued and outstanding.

MAGNEGAS CORPORATION

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FORM 10-Q REPORT

September 30, 2013

		Page Number
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements.	1
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	19
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.	25
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures.	25

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings.	26
Item 1A.	Risk Factors.	26
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.	26
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities.	26
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	26
Item 5.	Other Information.	26
Item 6.	Exhibits.	27

SIGNATURES		28

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

	Page Number

Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012 (audited)	2

Statements of Operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)	3

Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (unaudited)	4

Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)	5

Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements	6 – 18

MagneGas Corporation

Balance Sheets

	September 30,			December 31,
	2013			2012
	(Unaudited)			(Audited)
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	579,098		$	1,470,642
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $77,887 and $61,792, respectively		111,652			119,207
Inventory, at cost		1,816,283			961,984
Prepaid and other current assets		138,677			106,600
Total Current Assets		2,645,710			2,658,433

Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $828,376 and $448,302, respectively		6,071,145			7,193,371

Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $236,329 and $199,978, respectively		490,671			527,022
Investment in joint ventures		490,410			490,410
Security deposits		8,901			2,151
Total Assets	$	9,706,836		$	10,871,387


Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	164,163		$	483,688
Accrued expenses		118,861			95,856
Deferred revenue		163,331			233,330
Customer Deposits		293,985			0-
Total Current Liabilities		740,341			812,874

Total Liabilities		740,341			812,874

Stockholders' Equity
Preferred stock: $0.001 par; 10,000,000 authorized; 1,000,000 issued and outstanding		1,000			1,000
Common stock: $0.001 par; 900,000,000 authorized; 23,109,109 and 20,042,614issued and outstanding, respectively		23,109			20,043
Additional paid-in capital		25,663,815			22,284,841
Issued and unearned stock compensation					(13,333	)
Accumulated deficit		(16,721,429	)		(12,234,039	)
Total Stockholders' Equity		8,966,495			10,058,512

Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	9,706,836		$	10,871,387

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

MagneGas Corporation

Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

		Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2013			2012			2013			2012

Revenue:	$	125,410		$	201,096		$	391,698		$	522,052

Direct costs, metal cutting		84,994			133,616			235,032			316,824
		40,416			71,240			156,666			205,228
Operating Expenses:
Selling, General and Administration		954,002			1,313,718			2,894,629			2,915,925
Investor Relations		38,059			49,193			119,704			84,475
Stock-based compensation		394,727			672,099			1,180,021			1,699,622
Research and development		59,622			71,875			75,733			185,748
Depreciation and amortization		113,390			108,822			420,289			278,079
Total Operating Expenses		1,559,799			2,166,514			4,690,376			5,163,849

Operating Income (Loss)		(1,519,383	)		(2,099,034	)		(4,533,710	)		(4,958,621	)

Other Income and (Expense):		45,964						45,964
Interest		3			649			356			(379	)
Total Other Income (Expense)		45,967			649			46,320			(379	)

Net Income (Loss) before tax benefit		(1,473,416	)		(2,098,385	)		(4,487,390	)		(4,959,000	)
Provision for Income Taxes								-
Net Income (Loss)	$	(1,473,416	)	$	(2,098,385	)	$	(4,487,390	)	$	(4,959,000	)

Net Loss per share:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.28	)
Weighted average common shares:
Basic and diluted		22,920,592			19,124,100			21,311,007			17,410,423

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

MagneGas Corporation

Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity

(Unaudited)

									Additional			Unearned
	Preferred				Common				Paid in			Stock			Accumulated			Total
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Capital			Comp			Deficit			Equity
Balance at December 31, 2011		2,000	$	2		15,438,930	$	15,439	$	10,334,904		$	(28,333	)	$	(5,097,097	)	$	5,224,915
Compensation recognized under consulting agreement, May 31, 2008													15,000						15,000
Issued per resolution		998,000		998															998
Issued for services						334,220		334		988,990									989,324
Options issued										1,039,500									1,039,500
Options exercised for cash						88,887		89		262,286									262,375
Previous excersised						37,500		38		(38	)
Private placement						4,139,077		4,139		10,471,842									10,475,981
Offerings costs										(824,039	)								(824,039	)
Sale of shares for cash						4,000		4		11,396									11,400
Net loss																(7,136,942	)		(7,136,942	)
Balance at December 31, 2012		1,000,000		1,000		20,042,614		20,043		22,284,841			(13,333	)		(12,234,039	)		10,058,512
Compensation recognized under consulting agreement, May 31, 2008													13,333						13,333
Common shares issued:						2,821,889-		2,821		2,628,273									2,631,094
Offerings costs										(110,649)									(110,649
Issued in exchange for services						244,606		245		861,350									861,595
								-		-
Net loss (unaudited)																(4,487,390	)		(4,487,390	)
Balance at September 30, 2013		1,000,000	$	1,000		23,109,109	$	23,109	$	25,663,815		$	(	)	$	(16,721,429	)	$	8,966,495

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

MagneGas Corporation

Statement of Cash Flows

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

(Unaudited)

	September 30,
	2013			2012

Cash Flows from Operations
Net loss	$	(4,487,390	)	$	(4,959,000	)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		420,289			278,079
Stock compensation		1,180,021			1,699,622
Provision for bad debt		16,094			25,000
Changes in operating assets:
Accounts receivable		(8,539	)		(110,775	)
Inventory		58,221			(1,058,293	)
Prepaid & other current assets		(32,077	)		2,500
Accounts payable		(319,954	)		377,595
Accrued expenses		23,434			152,755
Customer deposits		293,985
Deferred revenue and customer deposits		(69,699	)		(69,999	)
Total adjustments to net income		1,561,476			1,296,484
Net cash (used in) operating activities		(2,925,915	)		(3,662,516	)

Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Acquisition of property and equipment		(174,232	)		(2,839,691	)
Security deposit		(6,750	)		(2,153	)
Net cash flows (used in) investing activities		(180,982	)		(2,841,844	)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Repayments to Stockholder					(210,500)
Repayments on notes payable from related party		0-			(13,400	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		2,215,157			9,613,599
Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities		2,215,157			9,389,699

Net increase (decrease) in cash		(891,544	)		2,885,339

Cash balance, beginning		1,470,642			1,429,412

Cash balance, ending	$	579,098		$	4,314,751

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information and non-cash investing and financing activities:
Interest paid	$	1,269		$	-
Taxes paid	$	-		$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

MagneGas Corporation

Notes to the Unaudited Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

1. Background Information

MagneGas Corporation (the “Company”) was organized in the state of Delaware on December 9, 2005. The Company was originally organized under the name 4307, Inc, for the purpose of locating and negotiating with a business entity for a combination. On April 2, 2007 all the issued and outstanding shares of 4307, Inc. were purchased and the Company name was changed to MagneGas Corporation.

We are an alternative energy company that creates a system that produces hydrogen based fuel through the gasification of liquid and liquid waste. We have developed a process which gasifies various types of liquid waste through a proprietary plasma arc system.. A byproduct of this process is an alternative to natural gas currently sold in the metalworking market as a cutting fuel. We produce gas bottled in cylinders for the purpose of distribution to the metalworking market as an alternative to acetylene. Additionally, we market, for sale or licensure, our proprietary plasma arc technology for the processing of liquid waste (the “Plasma Arc Flow” or “Plasma Arc Flow System”). Through the course of our business development, we have established a retail and wholesale platform to sell our fuel for use in the metalworking and manufacturing industries. We have also established a network of brokers to sell our Plasma Arc Flow equipment internationally.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The significant accounting policies followed are:

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information, the instructions to SEC Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In preparing the financial statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the balance sheet and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and the following notes should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair statement of (a) the result of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012; (b) the financial position at September 30, 2013; and (c) cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, have been made.

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year classifications for comparability purposes.

Use of Estimates

The Company prepares its financial statements in conformity with GAAP. These principles require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management believes that these estimates are reasonable and have been discussed with the Board of Directors; however, actual results could differ from those estimates. The financial statements presented include estimates for patent life, recoverability of deferred tax assets and collections on our receivables. Our estimates include consideration of the useful lives of our intellectual property, allocations to research and development costs and recognition of deferred tax assets.

Variable Interest Entities

The Company considers the consolidation of entities to which the usual condition (ownership of a majority voting interest) of consolidation does not apply, focusing on controlling financial interests that may be achieved through arrangements that do not involve voting interest. If an enterprise holds a majority of the variable interests of an entity, it would be considered the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is generally required to consolidate assets, liabilities and non-controlling interests at fair value (or at historical cost if the entity is a related party) and subsequently account for the variable interest as if it were consolidated based on a majority voting interest. The Company has investments in joint ventures that are in development of the MagneGas technology, however the Company is not identified as a primary beneficiary; therefore no consolidation is required and the investments are listed at their cost.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) introduced a framework for measuring fair value and expanded required disclosure about fair value measurements of assets and liabilities. The Company adopted the standard for those financial assets and liabilities as of the beginning of the 2008 fiscal year and the impact of adoption was not significant. FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820 “ Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ” (ASC 820) defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principle or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

●	Level 1	Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
●	Level 2	Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates); and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
●	Level 3	Inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of September 30, 2013. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. These financial instruments include accounts receivable, inventory, other current assets, accounts payable, accrued compensation and accrued expenses. The fair value of the Company’s notes payable is estimated based on current rates that would be available for debt of similar terms which is not significantly different from its stated value. The Company applied ASC 820 for all non-financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.

Accounts Receivable, Credit

Accounts receivable consist of amounts due for the delivery of MagneGas sales to customers. An allowance for doubtful accounts is considered to be established for any amounts that may not be recoverable, which is based on an analysis of the Company’s customer credit worthiness, and current economic trends. Based on management’s review of accounts receivable, an allowance for doubtful accounts was considered necessary, based on considerations of limited credit history with our customers and in consideration of the economy. Receivables are determined to be past due, based on payment terms of original invoices. The Company does not typically charge interest on past due receivables.

Revenue Recognition

The Company generates revenue through two processes: (1) the sale of its MagneGas fuel for metal cutting and (2) the sale of its Plasma Arc Flow units. Additionally the Company also recognizes revenue from territorial license arrangements.

●	Revenue for metal-working fuel is recognized when shipments are made to customers. The Company recognizes a sale when the product has been shipped and risk of loss has passed to the customer.
●	Revenue generated from sales of its production unit is recognized on a percentage of completion, based on the progress during manufacturing of the unit. Our machine is a significant investment and generally requires a 6 to 9 month production cycle. During the course of building a unit the actual costs are tracked to our cost estimates and revenue is proportionately recognized during the process. Significant deposits are required before production. These deposits are classified as customer deposits. During our production, costs and progress earnings are accumulated and included in “Costs and earnings” as an asset.
●	Licenses are issued, per contractual agreement, for distribution rights within certain geographic territories. The Company recognizes revenue ratably, based on the amounts paid or values received, over the term of the licensing agreement.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of standard cost or market, which approximates actual cost. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method. Inventory is comprised of spare parts, consumables used in the production of gas, regulators and tips and accumulated costs incurred in the manufacturing process of units held for future sales.

Long-Lived Assets

Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method over estimated useful lives (3-7 years). Intellectual property assets are stated at their fair value acquisition cost. Amortization of intellectual property assets is calculated by the straight line method over their specific life (15 years). Historical costs are reviewed and evaluated for their net realizable value of the assets. The carrying amount of all long-lived assets is evaluated periodically to determine if adjustment to the depreciation and amortization period or the unamortized balance is warranted. Based upon its most recent analysis, the Company believes that no impairment of property and equipment existed at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Long-lived assets such as property, equipment and identifiable intangibles are reviewed for impairment whenever facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. When required impairment losses on assets to be held and used are recognized based on the fair value of the asset. The fair value is determined based on estimates of future cash flows, market value of similar assets, if available, or independent appraisals, if required. If the carrying amount of the long-lived asset is not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between the carrying amount and fair value of the asset. When fair values are not available, the Company estimates fair value using the expected future cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk associated with the recovery of the assets. The Company did not recognize any impairment losses for any periods presented.

Stock Based Compensation

The Company issues restricted stock to consultants for various services and to Directors for their service on the Board of Directors. Cost for these transactions are measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The value of the common stock is measured at the earlier of (i) the date at which a firm commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached or (ii) the date at which the counterparty's performance is complete. The Company recognized consulting expenses and a corresponding increase to additional paid-in-capital related to stock issued for services Stock compensation for the periods presented were issued to consultants for past services provided, accordingly, all shares issued are fully vested, and there is no unrecognized compensation associated with these transactions.

Shipping Costs

The Company includes shipping costs and freight-in costs in direct costs, for those expenses associated with revenue process. The Company has incurred shipping and delivery costs associated with establishing units at production sites as well as incurring costs in shipping samples, trade shows and other business related functions, which are charged as a selling or administrative expense. Shipping costs were $25,028 and $37,302 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Advertising Costs

The costs of advertising are expensed as incurred. Advertising expenses are included in the Company’s operating expenses. Advertising expense was $63,150 and $80,170 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Research and Development

The Company expenses research and development costs when incurred. Research and development costs include engineering and laboratory testing of product and outputs. Indirect costs related to research and developments are allocated based on percentage usage to the research and development. Research and Development expense was $75,733 and $185,748 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purpose, referred to as temporary differences. Deferred tax assets and liabilities at the end of each period are determined using the currently enacted tax rates applied to taxable income in the periods in which the deferred tax assets and liabilities are expected to be settled or realized.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share calculations are determined by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings (loss) per share calculations are determined by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares. In periods of net loss, stock equivalents are excluded, as those shares would be anti-dilutive. The Company has issued options to several investors, upon their purchase of shares. Options, whose strike price is less than the current market value, are considered common stock equivalents and are included in dilutive earnings per share.

(a) On June 26, 2012, the Company effected a ten-for-one reverse split of common shares. All share amounts have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the post-split shares

(b) Net loss for the period, options and other dilutive common stock equivalents are anti-dilutive and are excluded from computation.

	September 30,			September 30,
	2013			2012
Net loss	$	(4,487,390	)	$	(4,959,000	)

Weighted Average Shares
Common Stock		21,311,007			17,410,423
Common stock equivalents (Options)		-	*		-	*
		21,311,007			17,410,423

* Net loss for the period, options and other dilutive common stock equivalents are anti-dilutive and are excluded from computation.

As of September 30, 2013, there are no options and warrants vested above the current fair market trading value, which would be common stock equivalents.

3. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Except for rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws and a limited number of grandfathered standards, the FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ (“ASC”) is the sole source of authoritative GAAP literature recognized by the FASB and applicable to the Company. Management has reviewed the aforementioned rules and releases and believes any effect will not have a material impact on the Company's present or future consolidated financial statements.

4. Inventory

Inventory primarily consists of:

	September 30,			December 31,
		2013			2012
Production materials consumables, spare parts, & accessories		$	209,466		$	57,187
Units, Construction in process			1,606,817			904,797
		$	1,816,283		$	961,984

5. Long Lived Assets

Property and equipment consists of:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2013		2012
	$		$	-
Machinery and equipment		234,287		465,358
Furniture and office equipment		54,173		49,884
Transportation		225,844		220,336
Production units & cylinders		4,846,928		5,388,423
Land and buildings		1,538,290		1,517,672
		7,322,402		7,641,673
Less accumulated depreciation		828,376		448,302
	$	6,071,145	$	7,193,371

Depreciation of equipment was $383,938 and $241,729 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. A unit designated for Production was moved out and into Construction-In Progress since the unit being re-designed to a specific customer’s needs (to specific agreement) and will in the very near future be recognized as through a sale.

Intellectual property:

The Company owns intellectual property, which it is amortizing on a straight-line basis over the assets useful life. The Company assesses fair market value for any impairment to the carrying values. As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 management concluded that there was no impairment to the intangible assets.

	September 30,		December 31,
	2013		2012
Intellectual property	$	727,000	$	727,000
Less accumulated amortization		236,329		199,978
	$	490,671	$	527,022

Future amortization through December 31,:
2013		48,467
2014		48,467
2015		48,467
2016		48,467
2017 and thereafter		333,154
	$	527,022

Amortization of the intangible assets was $36,350 and $36,350 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Management periodically reviews the valuation of this asset for potential impairments. Consideration of various risks to the valuation and potential impairment includes, but is not limited to: (a) the technology’s acceptance in the marketplace and the Company’s ability to attain projected forecasts of revenue (discounted cash flow of projections); (b) competition of alternative solutions; and (c) federal and state laws which may prohibit the use of the Company’s production machinery as currently designed. Management has not impaired this asset, to date, and does not anticipate any negative impact from known current business developments. Management continuously measures the marketplace, potential revenue developments and competitive developments in the scientific industry.

6. Investment in Joint Ventures

On June 25, 2010, the Company entered into agreement with a Belgian company, whereby 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and territorial license rights were exchanged for a 20% interest in MagneGas Europe. The Company valued the investment in the Joint Venture at the fair market value of the shares issued ($23,750). The Company does not have effective or beneficial control over the European entity and is to account for the investment under the Cost Method.

On June 28, 2010, the Company entered into agreement with DDI Industries, a Chinese company, in contemplation of the formation of MagneGas China. The Company provided mechanical drawings (for complete construction), computer programs, license of patents (Greater China Region), trademarks, etc. of the Plasma Arc Flow Recyclers to the new entity in exchange for a $2 million investment in MagneGas Corporation (received as of September 30, 2010; subscription at a share price of $1.35 or 1,481,481 common shares and 20% share in MagneGas China. The Company’s investment has been valued at $466,660, a mutually agreed amount for the technology license. The MagneGas China entity has been funded in cash for an amount which reflects the intellectual property’s value. The Company does not have effective or beneficial control over the China entity so it will not for the investment under the Cost Method.

Our investments in joint ventures are considered as Level 3, as defined in FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820 “ Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ” (ASC 820), and management considers alternative methods for valuing these investments to determine if there would be impairment to the current carrying value, currently our cost basis. As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, management does not believe any impairment exists with regard to the investments in joint ventures.

7. Deferred Revenue and Customer Deposits

The Company has received deposits on production units and fees for exclusive territorial license. The Company has deferred the associated revenues until such time that production order is placed and produced (recognition under percentage of completion method) or through the passage of time (recognition over the life of the license term).

	September 30,		December 31,
	2013		2012
Mexico territory license, non-refundable payment from a company for a six-month period ending February 28, 2011	$	150,000	$	150,000
China territory license, exclusive 5 year license, expiring June 28, 2015		466,660		466,660
Philippines, deposit on production unit		100,000		100,000
		716,660		716,660
Portion recognized		553,329		483,330
Deferred revenue and customer deposits	$	163,331	$	233,330

The amount recognized as revenue under licensing arrangements was, $69,999 and $69,999 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

8. Income Tax

Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes

The Company has not recognized a provision for income tax benefit during the periods presented, due to the net operating losses incurred. The Company may recognize benefits in future periods when management believes that any benefit will be recognized.

Deferred Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes are the result of timing differences between book and tax basis of certain assets and liabilities, timing of income and expense recognition of certain items and net operating loss carry-forwards.

The Company assesses temporary differences resulting from different treatments of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are recorded in our balance sheets. The Company evaluates the realizability of its deferred tax assets and assesses the need for a valuation allowance on an ongoing basis. In evaluating its deferred tax assets, the Company considers whether it is more likely than not that the deferred income tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets depends upon generating sufficient future taxable income prior to the expiration of the tax attributes. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance the Company must project future levels of taxable income. This assessment requires significant judgment. The Company examined the evidence related to a recent history of tax losses, the economic conditions in which it operates recent organizational changes, its forecasts and projections. The Company will continue to evaluate its deferred tax assets to determine whether any changes in circumstances could affect the realization of their future benefit.

The Company had not previously recognized an income tax benefit for its operating losses generated since inception through December 31, 2009 based on uncertainties concerning its ability to generate taxable income in future periods of which, at the time, the realization could not be considered more likely than not. Based on events subsequent to the balance sheet date, management has re-assessed the valuation allowance and the recognition of its deferred tax losses, however, based on the Company’s history of losses and other negative evidence resulting in the allowance, no income tax benefit will be recognized for prior periods. The tax benefit for the prior periods, in the amount of $348,800, arising from operating losses as a start-up company and other temporary differences, has been off-set by an equal valuation allowance.

The following is a schedule of the deferred tax assets and liabilities as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

	September 30,		December 31,
	2013		2012
Deferred Tax Assets
Net Operating Loss Carry Forwards	$	-	$	456,500
Valuation Allowance			$	(456,000	)
Deferred Tax Liabilities
Total Deferred Tax Assets (Liabilities)	$	-	$

Net Deferred Tax Asset (Liabilities)	$	-	$	-

For balance sheet presentation the Company nets its current deferred tax assets and liabilities and non-current deferred tax assets and liabilities.

Management believes that the Company has matured and product acceptance will generate the revenues and achieve a level of profitability that would create taxable income of approximately $1.2 million, which would utilize the recognized deferred tax assets.

Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, these losses can be carried forward twenty years. As of December 31, 2012 the Company has net operating loss carry forwards remaining from the following years:

	Net
	Operating		Year
Year Generated	Loss		Expires
2007	$	375,000		2027
2008		977,000		2028
2009		1,255,000		2029
2011		2,126,000		2031
2012		7,136,942		2032
	$	11,869,942

The adoption of provisions, required by Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) No. 740, did not result in any adjustments.

The Company is currently open to audit under the statute of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service for the years ending December 31, 2008 through 2012. The Company state income tax returns are open to audit under the statute of limitations for the years ending December 31, 2006 through 2012.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to income taxes in income tax expense. The Company had incurred no penalties and interest for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012.

9. Equity

The Company has two classifications of stock:

Preferred Stock includes 10,000,000 shares authorized at a par value of $0.001. Preferred Stock has been issued as Series A Preferred Stock. Preferred Stock has liquidation and dividend rights over Common Stock, which is not in excess of its par value. The preferred stock has no conversion rights or mandatory redemption features. There have been 1,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock issued to an entity controlled by Dr. Ruggero Santill, Ermanno Santilli, President and CEO, Luisa Ingargiola, CFO and Carla Santilli, Director,. Each share of Preferred Stock is entitled to 100,000 votes.

Common Stock includes 900,000,000 shares authorized at a par value of $0.001. The holders of Common Stock and the equivalent Preferred Stock, voting together, shall appoint the members of the Board of the Directors. Each share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote.

Reverse Stock Split

On June 26, 2012 we effected a ten-for-one reverse split of common shares. All share amounts have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the post-split shares

Common Stock Issuances

The use of an initial small production refinery had been contributed by Dr. Ruggero Santilli, the former Chairman of the Board and former Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The computed rental values were based on the cost basis of the unit, which is approximately $210,500; the month-to-month rental agreement is $1,870 per month and had been charged to equipment rental expense in the operating expenses. To reflect the contributed value, the corresponding entry has been charged to additional paid in capital, and is included in the statement of stockholders’ equity. Total contributed value was $22,440 on an annual basis. Due to production demand, on December 28, 2011, the Company and Dr. Santilli entered into an agreement to transfer the title of the unit to the Company in exchange for a demand note in the amount of $210,500 at an interest rate of 3%. As of September 30, 2012 the amount has been paid in full.

The Company issued 998,000 shares of preferred stock to the controlling members in January 2012, valued at $998.

On June 1, 2011, the Company executed agreements for two private offerings of its common stock (each an “Offering”). In connection with the Offerings, the Company entered into two securities purchase agreements (each a “Securities Purchase Agreement”) with DDI Industry International (Beijing) Co., Ltd (the “Investor”). Pursuant to the first Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company issued an aggregate of 384,625 shares of its common stock (the “Shares”) to the Investor for a purchase price of $500,000, at $1.30 per share. Pursuant to the second Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company issued an aggregate of 333,333 Shares to the Investor for a purchase price of $561,248, at $1.68 per share. The Company has received the proceeds from both offerings. The second offering, in the amount of $561,248 was received in August 2011.

Prior to this Offering, the Company and the Investor did have a material relationship. In June 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with the Investor to form a Chinese joint venture (“MagneGas China”). Pursuant to the agreement, the Investor acquired exclusive MagneGas™ Technology and manufacturing rights for the Greater China Market. The Investor also acquired 1,481,482 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $2 million and purchased a 300Kw Plasma Arc Refinery at a purchase price of $1.855 million. The Company owns 20% of the equity in MagneGas China and the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Ruggero Santilli, is a member of the board of directors. The Company is working with MagneGas China to replace Dr. Ruggero Santilli with Ermanno Santilli in this position. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company appointed Allen Feng, the Chief Executive Officer of the Investor, to its board of directors.

In October and November 2011, the Company entered into a definitive agreement with investors to sell in a private placement 1,966,250 shares of its common stock at a purchase price of $1.60 per unit, including warrants to purchase 1,966,250 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of $3.00, resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of $3.2 million, before deducting placement agent fees and other offering expenses. The warrants are exercisable at a price of $3.00 per share and expire five years from the initial closing date. During the quarter ended September 30, 2012, 84,125 options were exercised at the option price of $3.00, for proceeds of $252,375, included in proceeds from sale of stock in financing activities of the statement of cash flows.

In the quarter ended March 31, 2012 the Company entered into a definitive agreement with investors to sell in a private placement an aggregate 1,941,250 shares of its common stock and warrants to purchase 970,625 shares of its common stock at a purchase price of $2.00 per unit, resulting in gross proceeds to the Company of $3,882,500, before deducting placement agent fees and other offering expenses. The warrants are exercisable at an exercise price of $4.00 per share and expire five years from the initial closing date. Pursuant to the terms of the definitive agreement, the Company conducted two closings with parties to the definitive agreement. The initial closing occurred on March 29, 2012, for gross proceeds of $3,117,500 in exchange for 1,558,750 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 779,375 shares of common stock. The second closing was completed on April 3, 2012 for gross proceeds of $765,000 in exchange for 382,500 shares of common stock and warrants for an additional 191,250 shares of common stock. No warrants have been exercised during the nine month period ending September 30, 2013.

On August 16, 2012 the Company completed a public offering of 2,850,000 shares of common stock at a price to the public of $3.00 per share. Of the 2,850,000 shares of common stock, an aggregate 652,173 shares were offered by three stockholders of the Company. In addition, the Company and the selling stockholders granted the underwriters a 45-day option to purchase up to an additional 427,500 shares of common stock solely to cover over-allotments, if any. The Company used the net proceeds from the offering to further develop its products and operations, for working capital, and general corporate purposes. The Company did not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of shares by the selling stockholders. The offering resulted in the net issuance of 2,197,827 shares of common stock (2,850,000, less 652,173 common shares of the selling shareholders) for gross proceeds of $6,593,481 less offering and closing costs of $758,477, resulting in net proceeds of $5,835,004.

On June 5, 2013, the Company closed its previously-announced underwritten public offering of 2,728,139 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and 2,728,139 warrants to purchase 682,035 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $1.35 per share, which includes the full exercise of the over-allotment option by the underwriter to purchase an additional 355,844 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 88,961 shares of common stock with an exercise price of $1.35, at a combined price to the public of $0.90, for gross proceeds to the company of $2,455,325. The Company intends to use the proceeds from the offering for working capital and general corporate purposes. Northland Securities, Inc. acted as underwriter for the offering.

On September 27, 2013, the company settled a dispute with GreenPlanet Aid C.V. of Mexico (GreenPlanet) to which GreenPlanet was requesting a refund of a non-refundable deposit and as settlement of this dispute the Company offered 93,750 shares of common stock. This resulted in a $43,750 gain which is recognized as Other Income. This is an unrelated entity to Clear Sky Energy S.A. de C.V. of Mexico, who have a current active contract with the Company.

On September 27, 2013, the company issued 31,250 shares of Common Stock to Benewatt Holdings, Inc. as payment for consulting services rendered.

Options and Warrants

In the period ending March 31, 2011, the Company issued 50,000 warrants to a consultant with an exercise term of 5 years and a strike price of $1.50. The Company calculated the value of these shares at $68,500, based on using Black Sholes model. Assumptions used in the calculation were volatility of 151.7%, estimated life of 2.5 years, 0% forfeiture and risk free interest rate of 1.8%. On June 28, 2012, these warrants were exercised on a cashless basis, resulting in the issuance of 37,500 common shares.

During 2011, the Company also issued options attached to the purchase of shares at a 1:1 ratio, resulting in the issuance of 2,079,563 options. Value for these attached options was included in the original capitalized transactions. These options are exercisable within 3 years at a price of $3.00 per share. During the quarter ended September 30, 2012, 84,125 options were exercised for proceeds of $252,375.

In the period ending March 31, 2012, the Company issued 60,000 options to a consultant with an exercise term of 5 years, vesting over a one year period, and a strike price of $1.50. The Company calculated the value of these shares at $19,300, based on using Black Sholes model. Assumptions used in the calculation were volatility of 31.6%, estimated life of 1.5 years, 0% forfeiture and risk free interest rate of 1.8%. On June 28, 2012 these warrants were exercised on a cashless basis, resulting in the issuance of 37,500 common shares.

On March 31, 2012 the Company issued 2,910,000 options to executives, in connection with employment agreements, at an exercise price of $1.50, vesting over a 3 year period. The Company calculated the value of these shares at $3,921,900, based on using Black-Sholes model. Assumptions used in the calculation were: volatility of 31.6%; estimated life of 2.5 years; 0% forfeiture; and risk free interest rate of .39%. The Company recognized stock-based compensation, on a straight-line basis over the ratable vesting period, in the amount of $1,135,294 for the nine months ending September 30, 2013.

During the nine month period ended September 30, 2012, in association with the private placement stated above, there were 1,067,687 warrants issued with the $3,882,500 raise. These warrants are for a five year period with an exercise price of $4.00 per share.

**During the nine month period ended September 30, 2013, in association with the public offering stated above, there were 770,996 warrants issued with the $2,455,325 raise. These warrants are for a 5 year period with an exercise price of $1.35 per share.

The following is a summary of outstanding options and warrants:

							Weighted Average
	Options			Options			Intrinsic		Exercise		Remaining
	Outstanding			Vested			Value		Price		Term

Options, December 31, 2011		2,215,039			2,215,039
Granted		3,977,687			1,320,187		$	3.43	$	2.17	4.8 years
Exercised		(88,887	)		(88,887	)
Forfeited		(130,714	)		(130,714	)					2.3 years
December 31, 2012		5,973,125			3,315,625
Granted		1,485,996
Exercised		-
Forfeited		450,000
September 30, 2013		7,009,121			4,316,422		$	2.44	$	1.43	2.9 years

10. Related Party Transactions

At various times we received advances from Dr. Santilli and Carla Santilli for unsecured promissory notes. All funds are at the same terms of the original stockholder note. These promissory notes have no repayment date; however they are payable within 30 days of written demand. Payment is to include accrued simple interest at 4%. Since 2007, the Company received promissory notes in the aggregate amount of $257,200. All note principal has been paid in full.

The Company occupies 5,000 square feet of the building owned by a related party. Rent is payable at $4,000 on a month to month basis. The facility allows for expansion needs. The lease is held by EcoPlus, Inc., a company that is effectively controlled by Dr. Santilli.

The Company holds a 20% ownership of MagneGas Europe acquired by the issuance of 25,000 shares of common shares, which were valued at the fair market price at the date of grant, June 25, 2010, at $0.95 per share for an aggregate of $23,750. Dr. Santilli is a stockholder of MagneGas Europe, and at the time of the agreement, Ermanno Santilli, our current Chief Executive Officer, was the Chief Executive Officer of MagneGas Europe and Vice President of MagneGas Corporation.

Employment Agreements

On March 31, 2012, we entered into employment agreements with our key employees. A summary of these agreements are as follows:

Executive Title	Term*	Annual Salary**		Options***
Luisa Ingargiola, Chief Financial Officer, Director	March 31, 2014	$	120,000	25,000 vesting per quarter, exercisable at $1.50
Carla Santilli, Director	March 31, 2014	$	60,000	25,000 vesting per quarter, exercisable at $1.50
Ermanno Santilli, Chief Executive Officer, Director	March 31, 2014	$	144,000	37,500 vesting per quarter, exercisable at $1.50

* Term is extendable at mutual consent.

** Annual salaries also stipulate performance bonuses, to be determined and approved by Board of Directors.

*** Options, valued to be $3,805,500, using Black-Scholes method, The Company recognizes stock-based compensation, on a straight-line basis over the ratable vesting period. Assumptions used in the calculation were: volatility of 47.9%; estimated life of 2.5 years; 0% forfeiture; and risk free interest rate of .51%.

****Ermanno Santilli, Luisa Ingargiola and Carla Santilli deferred their salary starting August 26, 2013 until such time that the Company is better capitalized.

11. Segment Information

The following information is the results of our operating revenue segments:

	Revenue		Costs		Margin

September 30, 2013
Segments:
Metal Cutting	$	321,699	$	235,032	$	86,667
License Fees		69,999		-		69,999
Unit Sales		-		-		-
	$	391,698	$	235,032	$	156,666

September 30, 2012
Segments:
Metal Cutting	$	452,053	$	316,824	$	135,229
License Fees		69,999		-		69,999
Unit Sales		-		-		-
	$	522,052	$	316,824	$	205,228

12. Contingencies

From time to time the Company may be a party to litigation matters involving claims against the Company. The Company operates with waste, hazardous material and within a highly regulated industry, which may lend itself to legal matters. Management believes that there are no current matters that would have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

The Company purchased an automated cylinder tracking system and is in the process of identifying all cylinders and related equipment owned by the Company with a corresponding review of the valuation of these assets. This review will be completed by December 31, 2013.

13. Subsequent Events

There are no subsequent events.

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward Looking Statements

The information contained in Item 2 contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Actual results may materially differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain risks and uncertainties set forth in this report. Although management believes that the assumptions made and expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, there is no assurance that the underlying assumptions will, in fact, prove to be correct or that actual results will not be different from expectations expressed in this report.

This filing contains a number of forward-looking statements which reflect management’s current views and expectations with respect to our business, strategies, products, future results and events, and financial performance. All statements made in this filing other than statements of historical fact, including statements addressing operating performance, events, or developments which management expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future, including statements related to distributor channels, volume growth, revenues, profitability, new products, adequacy of funds from operations, statements expressing general optimism about future operating results, and non-historical information, are forward looking statements. In particular, the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “may,” variations of such words, and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements, and their absence does not mean that the statement is not forward-looking. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including those discussed below. Our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from historical results as well as those expressed in, anticipated, or implied by these forward-looking statements. We do not undertake any obligation to revise these forward-looking statements to reflect any future events or circumstances.

Readers should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which are based on management’s current expectations and projections about future events, are not guarantees of future performance, are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions (including those described below), and apply only as of the date of this filing. Our actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from the results expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. Factors which could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, the risks to be discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and in the press releases and other communications to shareholders issued by us from time to time which attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors which may affect our business. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

Overview

We are an alternative energy company that creates a system that produces hydrogen based fuel through the gasification of liquid and liquid waste. We have developed a process which gasifies various types of liquid waste through a proprietary plasma arc system. A byproduct of this process, MagneGas™, is an alternative to natural gas currently sold in the metalworking market as a cutting fuel. We produce MagneGas™ bottled in cylinders for the purpose of distribution to the metalworking market as an alternative to acetylene. Additionally, we market, for sale or licensure, our proprietary plasma arc technology for the processing of liquid waste (the “Plasma Arc Flow” or “Plasma Arc Flow System”). Through the course of our business development, we have established a retail platform to sell our fuel for use in the metalworking and manufacturing industries. We have also established a network of independent brokers and distributors to sell our equipment worldwide.

MagneGas Corporation was organized in the state of Delaware on December 9, 2005. We were originally organized under the name 4307, Inc., for the purpose of locating and negotiating with a business entity for a combination. On April 2, 2007 all the issued and outstanding shares of 4307, Inc. were purchased by Clean Energies Tech Co., a private company owned by Dr. Ruggero Santilli, the inventor of the Plasma Arc Flow™ technology. Following this stock purchase, our name was changed to MagneGas Corporation.

Recent Developments

The Company has spent the last several months developing its strategy for increasing revenue and reducing costs. To that end, it has identified three major market segments which it will pursue for generating revenue:

·	Industrial Gas Sales
·	Equipment Sales for Liquid Waste Processing
·	Use of MagneGas™ for the Co-Combustion of Hydro-Carbon Fuels to Reduce Emissions

The Company has also embarked on an aggressive cost cutting strategy which includes the elimination of non-essential personnel, closing of locations that are not producing sufficient revenue to cover expenses and improving margins on both equipment and fuel sales. The Company has launched a new Research and Development initiative with the following focus:

·	High volume processing of oil
·	Smaller scale recyclers for testing and sale
·	Third party verification of fuel and equipment safety and performance results

To that end we have made the following progress:

Sales

Industrial Gas Sales

The Company has signed several new fuel distributors for the metal working market, including Accugas and GTW Welding in Michigan, AWISCO in New York, Lake Welding and CO2 gas in Florida and Welders Services Incorporated in Indiana. It also continues to sell fuel through existing distributors in Michigan, Florida and Pennsylvania. In addition, the Company is in various stages of negotiation with several other distributors and large end users in the Industrial Gas industry.

The Company has received approval by both the Clearwater Florida and New York City Fire Departments for the use of its fuel as a replacement for Acetylene in metal cutting for extractions and demolitions. Both cities have placed their initial order for fuel and the Company has been in extensive training with fire fighters from both locations for its proper use. These relationships further validate the safety and effectiveness of the MagneGas fuel for metal cutting.

Equipment Sales

On August 23, 2013, we entered into a definitive agreement with a group from the Central Asian country of Kazakhstan to supply them with a mini-refinery for $500,000 which they plan to use to test various liquid wastes. Based on the results of these tests, they anticipate purchasing an industrial size unit in 2014 or 2015. In the agreement it was stipulated that they make down payments as construction progresses. Completion and shipment is scheduled for February 23, 2014 at which time the final payment will be submitted to MagneGas and the revenue will be recognized. As of November 1, 2013 they have paid $276,000.

On August 19, 2013, the Company entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with “EAWC Technologies” of Florida and “Swiss Water Tech” of Switzerland to promote the sale of the MagneGas™ refineries through their network of clean energy and clean water distribution platforms. EAWC Technologies has entered into an agreement with “Nuova Magnegas Italia” (an unrelated Magnegas distributor) to place a small refinery owned by Nuova MagneGas Italia on site in Switzerland to act as a demonstration center to sell MagneGas™ refineries worldwide, sourced from MagneGas Corporation in the United States.

The Company has appointed independent brokers from several areas of the world for equipment sales and is in various stages of negotiation with groups from South Korea, Australia, Brazil, Costa Rica and Europe for the sale of equipment. The Company has also produced new brochures and updated its website to target these types of sales.

On March 20, 2013, we entered into definitive agreements with Clear Sky Energy S.A. de C.V. (“CSE”) to which CSE will purchase a Plasma Arc Flow™ refinery. The $765,000 progress payment under this agreement has been extended to November 20, 2014 as the business needs and objectives of the customer have changed and the next steps of the agreement are under negotiation. These negotiations will still include certain exclusive distribution rights for Mexico as further outlined in our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company can make no assurances as to the outcome of these negotiations or receipt of progress payments.

MagneGas for the Co-Combustion of Hydro-Carbon Fuels to Reduce Emissions

On October 8, 2013, the Company signed a Memorandum of Understanding with a confidential group from the United States to enter into a joint venture arrangement for the testing, development and pursuit of the Co-Combustion of MagneGas™ with Coal Fired Power Plants to reduce the stack emissions and increase heat extraction (the “Joint Venture”). This Joint Venture included a $100,000 deposit which has been paid to the Company. The Joint Venture includes the creation of a New Company which will hold the exclusive rights for this market for the United States and Canada. A major research center in the United States associated with a power company is currently conducting third party testing and validation. The Company has completed internal testing both in the United States and Australia and has demonstrated reduced hydrocarbon emission and increased heat with the Co-Combustion of Coal and MagneGas™. Once third party testing is complete, the Company will work through the new Joint Venture to sell equipment, fuel and byproducts to end user coal power plants in this market.

Research and Development

The Company held a world summit in August at its headquarters in Tarpon Springs, Florida. MagneGas partners from around the world including Australia, Europe, China and the United States attended to share and collaborate on a variety of strategic technical advancements made by the partners for the MagneGas™ systems and fuels. MagneGas Italy presented their results on the sterilization of water based waste, MagneGas Australia presented their results on the Co-Combustion of MagneGas™ with Hydro-Carbon fuels and MagneGas China presented their advancements for the processing of sludge. Since that time, the Company has continued to collaborate closely with its partners to further the equipment and fuel sales through advanced research and development.

High Volume Processing of Oil

The Company has historically processed oil through the addition of water or other dilution, which limits the volume of oil processed and decreases the flame temperature. There are several customers that have requested larger volume processing of oil based waste. The Company has spent considerable effort to achieve lower dilution levels and higher volume processing and has made significant progress to date. It anticipates the oil processing system will be done by the end of December 2013, with a corresponding hotter fuel which will be introduced to the market in late 2013 or early 2014.

Smaller Scale Recycler

The MagneGas Research and Development team has focused on developing smaller units with less expensive and faster turnaround times allowing the rapid testing of a variety of liquids. The Company has created a new 20kW micro-unit for the testing of various liquid waste. This unit expedites the testing process for customers and includes a new venturi design which is expected to be the next generation of MagneGas™ refineries. The creation of this new unit has substantially increased the speed and efficiency of the testing process for new customers. A new provisional patent application has been filed on this design.

Third Party Validation of Fuel and Equipment

·	The Company received independent test results from a laboratory in Europe that demonstrated that sewage, swine blood and leachates, when passed through the MagneGas™ system, results in full sterilization of bio-contaminates suspended in the liquid.
·	MagneGas Australia (an unrelated MagneGas distributor) completed testing of MagneGas™ combusted with coal and found that the emissions from the coal were reduced by up to 50% and the heat output was increased.
·	An independent laboratory in the United States provided certified that cutting metal with MagneGas does not impact the metal or impede the strength of the weld.
·	An independent laboratory in the United States provided certified results that MagneGas™ made from a proprietary blend of liquid does not contain Carbon Monoxide.

Our Industry

Metalworking

We produce fuel for the metalworking fuel market. This market is currently dominated by acetylene. Acetylene is a gas that is considered toxic, unstable, emits soot when it burns and can be volatile. In recent years, several acetylene production plants have exploded, causing a shortage of acetylene and raising prices. MagneGas™ on the other hand, emits oxygen when it burns and independent users have rated MagneGas™ as a cleaner alternative to acetylene.

Liquid Waste Processing

Water-based liquid waste such as sewage, sludge and manures, are traditionally sterilized through the use of anaerobic digestion systems or the addition of chemical sterilization agents. Independent chemical analysis shows that the Company’s patented Plasma Arc Flow System sterilizes water based waste, without the use of chemical additives or anaerobic digestion, while producing a fuel for use as a natural gas alternative. The byproduct of this process is to produce a sterilized liquid that is under development for use as a liquid fertilizer.

Our Products

We currently have two products: the fuel called MagneGas™ and the machines that produce that gas known as, Plasma Arc Flow refineries.

Fuel

In the United States, we currently produce MagneGas™, which is comprised primarily of hydrogen. The fuel can be used as an alternative to natural gas to power industrial equipment, automobiles and for metal cutting. The fuel is stored in hydrogen cylinders which are then sold to market on a rotating basis. We believe we can sell the cylinders at a 20% to 30% lower price than acetylene and with a lower cost feedstock, we believe that as we develop less expensive feedstock, we can also compete on price against all other cutting gases such as propane. The Company is focusing its efforts on replacing acetylene until a lower priced feedstock can be located to compete against propane.

Equipment

The Plasma Arc Flow System can gasify many forms of liquid waste such as ethylene glycol and sterilize sewage and sludge. Plasma Arc Flow refineries have been configured in various sizes ranging from 50kw to 500kw depending on the application. Plasma Arc Flow refineries range in price from $500,000 to $5 Million. A 200Kw refinery was sold in 2010 to a customer in China for $1.855 Million. We have signed an agreement with a customer in Mexico in March 2013 to sell a 300kw refinery for $2.7 million and signed an agreement on August 23, 2013 with a group from Central Asia for $500,000

Manufacturing

Equipment

MagneGas™ systems are produced by us at our facility in Tarpon Springs, Florida. The proprietary components of the system are manufactured on location, while commercially available components such as generators and compressors are purchased from existing suppliers and assembled in Tarpon Springs. A new facility was purchased in 2012, located in Tarpon Springs, which will allow the production of up to 30 systems at any one time to allow for rapid growth of the Company.

Fuel

MagneGas™ is currently produced in Florida and Michigan. The fuel is compressed into standard industrial gas cylinders and delivered directly to local retail customers and distributors. We have developed a plan to significantly expand and diversify MagneGas™ fuel sales through the use of small, independently owned regional distributors, located within the vicinity of our existing refineries

Current MagneGas™ production is temporarily from a feedstock of virgin ethylene glycol (anti-freeze). We are currently working to enhance our ability to process and compress fuels produced from waste oils on a high volume basis. Jointly, our plan includes provisions to secure the feedstock supplies, relationships and logistical abilities to process post-consumer waste oils such as used motor oils and/or anti-freeze. We estimate that the cost of using post-consumer waste steam feedstock, including related costs such as permitting and waste disposal, will be least 50% lower than the cost of virgin feedstock furthering MagneGas’s advantage over acetylene and allowing us to effectively compete in the propane market.

To reduce expenses, MagneGas has closed the facilities in Flint, Michigan and Cocoa Beach, Florida as neither facility was generating sufficient revenue to cover expenses. The Company is continuing full operations in Chesterfield, Michigan and Tarpon Springs, Florida.

Customers

We distribute products through several industrial gas companies in Michigan, Florida, New York, Indiana and Pennsylvania. In addition, we have direct retail customers in both Michigan and Florida. In order to become a full service supplier of metal cutting fuel and hard goods, we have entered into an agreement with Matheson Tri-Gas, Inc. to purchase oxygen, argon, nitrogen and other gases at wholesale prices. In addition, we have now started distributing hard goods such as tips, torches, and regulators through Nasco, Inc. a national company that distributes welding supplies.

Strategic Relationships

We recently entered into commercial testing and discussion with a select group of leading U.S. strategic industrial companies and military contractors which, after conducting preliminary reviews of MagneGas™, are now seeking further testing or have agreed to purchase MagneGas™. These types of relationships inherently have a long sales cycle and have been under development for several years.

Navy

The U. S. Navy has been working with us to explore both the use of MagneGas™ for metal working and the use of the Plasma Arc Flow system for liquid waste processing. The National Center for Manufacturing Sciences, a testing contractor for the U.S. Navy, completed testing of MagneGas™ as an environmentally-friendly alternative for major metal cutting projects, particularly to reduce emissions during the breakup and recycling of retiring vessels. The final written report compared seven methods and gases for metal cutting to find the lowest opacity and showed MagneGas™ as one of the only two methods with positive results. The Company has developed a gas without Carbon Monoxide to meet the Navy standards for this project. On November 1, 2013 the Navy accepted the specifications of this gas and has requested onsite testing which is anticipated to occur in the coming months, procurement of the initial test fuel is expected to occur in November of 2013.

General Motors

In 2012, General Motors announced that it had completed preliminary testing of MagneGas™ as an alternative to Acetylene and agreed to complete user testing at two facilities. Since then, we have also been working with General Motors to test various liquid wastes such as paint sludge and waste oils for processing and conversion to MagneGas™ to fuel several possible internal projects such as forklift truck operation, electricity generation and the heating /cooling of General Motors’ large facilities. Testing of those liquids is continuing in cooperation with General Motors. Since the Company has supplied fuel for a vendor of General Motors for a large demolition project, but is still exploring the use of the MagneGas™ fuel in General Motors manufacturing facilities.

Registration Statement on Form S-3

The Company filed a shelf offering on Form S-3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on May 17, 2013. Under the shelf registration statement, which was declared effective by the SEC on May 28, 2013, the Company may offer and sell from time to time in the future, in one or more offerings, common stock, preferred stock, warrants, rights, and units not to exceed $20,000,000. Additionally, selling shareholders may sell up to 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.

Going forward, this shelf offering will give the Company flexibility to take advantage of acquisition opportunities that may arise in the future by accessing the capital markets on a timely and cost-effective basis. The specifics of any future offering, along with the prices and terms of any such securities offered by the Company, will be determined at the time of any such offering and will be described in detail in a prospectus supplement filed in connection with such offering.

Results of Operations

Comparison for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012

Revenues

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 we generated revenues of $391,698 and $522,052, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, we generated revenues from our metal cutting fuel of $321,699 and $452,053, respectively.

For the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 we generated revenues of $125,410 and $201,096, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, we generated revenues from our metal cutting fuel of $102,077 and $177,763, respectively.

For our technology licensing, we have recognized $69,999 and $69,999 for the nine months ended September30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These license fees are ratably earned over the terms of the licensing agreement.

For our technology licensing, we have recognized $23,333 and $23,233 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These license fees are ratably earned over the terms of the licensing agreement.

Of our six available units, we have delivered two units for production and distribution at key locations for our metal fuel resellers. One has been delivered to Michigan where it is currently operating producing fuel for Michigan. The other is operating in Tarpon Springs, Florida. In addition, there is a third unit operating in Tarpon Springs testing various liquid wastes for potential customers. The remaining three units are currently for sale or will be deployed for metal working as other markets develop.

Operating Expenses

Operating costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were $4,690,376 and $5,163,849, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we recognized a non-cash charge of $1,180,021 in stock based compensation, compared to $1,699,622 in the comparable nine months ended September 30, 2012. Other non-cash operating expenses were due to depreciation and amortization charges of $420,289 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2013, compared to $278,079 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Operating costs for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 were $1,559,799 and $2,166,514, respectively. During the three months ended September 30, 2013 we recognized a non-cash charge of $394,727 in stock based compensation, compared to $672,099 in the comparable three months ended September 30, 2012. Other non-cash operating expenses were due to depreciation and amortization charges of $113,390 for the three month period ended September 30, 2013, compared to $108,822 for the three months ended September 30, 2012.

In the current quarter, as in prior quarters, we used common stock as a method of payment for certain services, primarily the advertising and promotion of the technology to increase investor awareness and as incentive to its key employees and consultants. We expect to continue these arrangements, though due to a stronger operating position, this method of payment may become limited to employees.

Net Loss

Our operating results have recognized losses in the amount of $4,487,390 and $4,959,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The decrease in the losses was attributable to stock based compensation as well as decreases in general and administrative expenses through better utilization of funds and implementing tighter controls and policies focusing on priorities to develop new strategies and approaches to the market.

Our operating results have recognized losses in the amount of $1,473,416 and $2,098,385 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The reduction in the losses was largely attributable to stock based compensation and our new market driven approach to focus on developing the most promising prospects.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Completion of our plan of operations is subject to attaining adequate and continued revenue. We cannot assure investors that adequate revenues will be generated and without the immediate sale of equipment or units, our plan is to complete a capital raise in the near term. This capital raise will be necessary to continue operations while we grow our recurring revenue base through metal cutting fuel sales. We are also actively seeking the sale of equipment to supplement our cash position. Concurrently, we are reducing our operational expenses to allow time for the recurring revenue to grow to an adequate level to cover operational expenses. This capital raise will be necessary to complete our long term strategic plan.

As reflected in the unaudited financial statements we currently have an accumulated a deficit of approximately $17 million dollars. Our cash flow from operations for the nine month period ending September 30, 2013 used approximately $3.1 million of cash. Cash was used primarily to fund ongoing operations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Critical Accounting Policies

Our significant accounting policies are presented in our notes to financial statements for the period ended September 30, 2013 and fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, which are contained in the Company’s 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The significant accounting policies that are most critical and aid in fully understanding and evaluating the reported financial results include the following:

We issue restricted stock to consultants for various services. Cost for these transactions are measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The value of the common stock is measured at the earlier of (i) the date at which a firm commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached or (ii) the date at which the counterparty's performance is complete.

Long-lived assets such as property, equipment and identifiable intangibles are reviewed for impairment whenever facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. When required impairment losses on assets to be held and used are recognized based on the fair value of the asset. The fair value is determined based on estimates of future cash flows, market value of similar assets, if available, or independent appraisals, if required. If the carrying amount of the long-lived asset is not recoverable from its undiscounted cash flows, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between the carrying amount and fair value of the asset. When fair values are not available, the Company estimates fair value using the expected future cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk associated with the recovery of the assets. We did not recognize any impairment losses for any periods presented.

We generate revenue through three processes: (a) our sale of our MagneGas™ fuel for metal cutting; (b) sale of its Plasma Arc Flow units; and (c) licensing.

●	Revenue for metal-working fuel is recognized when shipments are made to customers. We recognize a sale when the product has been shipped and risk of loss has passed to the customer.
●	Revenue generated from sales of its production unit is recognized on a percentage of completion, based on the progress during manufacturing of the unit. Our machine is a significant investment and generally requires a 6 to 9 month production cycle. During the course of building a unit the actual costs are tracked to our cost estimates and revenue is proportionately recognized during the process. Significant deposits are required before production. These deposits are classified as customer deposits. During our production, costs and progress earnings are accumulated and included in “Costs and earnings” as an asset.
●	Licenses are issued, per contractual agreement, for distribution rights within certain geographic territories. We recognize revenue ratably, based on the amounts paid or values received, over the term of the licensing agreement.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure of Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports, filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In reaching a reasonable level of assurance, management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. In addition, the design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, a control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

As required by the SEC Rule 13a-15(b), we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings.

We are not currently involved in any litigation that we believe could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. There is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries or of our companies or our subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors.

Other than the Risk Factors below, there have been no changes that constitute material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our 2012 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K.

Our future success is dependent, in part, on the performance and continued service of Ermanno Santilli, Bryan George, and other key personnel. Without their continued service, we may be forced to interrupt our operations.

We are presently dependent to a great extent upon the experience, abilities and continued services of Ermanno Santilli, our President and CEO and Bryan George, our Senior Vice President of Industrial Gas Sales. Ermanno has several years of experience regarding the technical operation and deployment of our refineries and Bryan George has over 20 years of experience in the industrial gas market. The loss of any of their services would delay our business operations substantially.

Certain members of our board of directors, their affiliates and our executive officers, as stockholders, control our company.

Our largest stockholders together with the other members of our board of directors and our executive officers, as stockholders, collectively beneficially own approximately 34.3% of our outstanding common stock. As a result of this ownership, they have the ability to significantly influence all matters requiring approval by stockholders of our company, including the election of directors. In particular, Dr. Santilli, the former Chairman of our board of directors, beneficially owns 32.1% of our outstanding common stock. In addition to ownership of our common stock, Dr. Santilli and his spouse Carla Santilli, together with their children, Ermanno Santilli, our Chief Executive Officer, and Luisa Ingargiola, our Chief Financial Officer (the “Santilli Family”), beneficially own 100% of our outstanding 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, which entitles the Santilli Family to voting rights in the aggregate of 100,000,000,000 votes. As a result, the Santilli Family has the ability to significantly influence all matters requiring approval by stockholders of our company. This concentration of ownership also may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of our company that may be favored by other stockholders. This could prevent transactions in which stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over current market prices.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

On September 27, 2013, the company issued 31,250 shares of Common Stock to Benewatt Holdings, Inc. as payment for consulting services rendered.

The above shares were issued in reliance on the exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. These shares of our common stock qualified for exemption under Section 4(2) since the issuance shares by us did not involve a public offering. The offering was not a “public offering” as defined in Section 4(2) due to the insubstantial number of persons involved in the deal, , manner of the issuance and number of shares issued. We did not undertake an offering in which we sold a high number of shares to a high number of investors. In addition, the investors had the necessary investment intent as required by Section 4(2) since they agreed to and received share certificates bearing a legend stating that such shares are restricted pursuant to Rule 144 of the Act. This restriction ensures that these shares would not be immediately redistributed into the market and therefore not be part of a “public offering.” Based on an analysis of the above factors, we have met the requirements to qualify for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for this transaction.

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable

Item 5.

Other Information.

None

Item 6.

Exhibits

Exhibit Number	Exhibit Title	Filing Method

3.1	Certificate of Incorporation, as amended March 26, 2007, February 3, 2009 and June 22, 2012. (1)	Incorporated by Reference

3.2	Bylaws. (2)	Incorporated by Reference

31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	Filed herewith

31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	Filed herewith

32.1*	Certification of Principal Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	Furnished herewith

32.2*	Certification of Principal Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	Furnished herewith

101.INS	XBRL Instance Document	Filed herewith

101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Schema	Filed herewith

101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase	Filed herewith

101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase	Filed herewith

101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase	Filed herewith

101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase	Filed herewith

*In accordance with SEC Release 33-8238, Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 are being furnished and not filed.

(1)	Filed as an Exhibit on Current Report on Form 8-K with the SEC on June 25, 2012.

(2)	Filed as an Exhibit on Form S-1 with the SEC on May 30, 2012.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	MagneGas Corporation

	By:	/s/ Ermanno Santilli
		Ermanno Santilli
		Chief Executive Officer (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Executive Officer)

	Dated: November 14, 2013

	By:	/s/ Luisa Ingargiola
		Luisa Ingargiola
		Chief Financial Officer (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

	Dated: November 14, 2013