BEACON ROOFING SUPPLY INC - Quarter Report: 2010 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C.
20549
FORM
10-Q
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
|
FOR
THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2010
OR
¨
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
|
FOR
THE TRANSITION PERIOD
FROM TO
COMMISSION
FILE NO.: 000-50924
BEACON
ROOFING SUPPLY, INC.
(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE
|
36-4173371
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
incorporation
or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
|
One
Lakeland Park Drive,
|
||
Peabody,
Massachusetts
|
01960
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
978-535-7668
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of
this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ¨ YES ¨ NO
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.
(Check one):
Large
accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated
filer x
|
Non-accelerated
filer ¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller
reporting company ¨
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES ¨ NO x
As of
May 1, 2010, there were 45,549,243 outstanding shares of the registrant's
common stock, $.01 par value per share.
BEACON
ROOFING SUPPLY, INC.
Form 10-Q
For
the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2010
INDEX
Part I.
|
Financial Information
|
2
|
Item 1.
|
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
|
2
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
2
|
|
Consolidated Statements of
Operations
|
3
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows
|
4
|
|
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
|
5
|
|
Item 2.
|
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition And Results of Operations
|
10
|
Overview
|
10
|
|
Results of Operations
|
11
|
|
Seasonality and Quarterly
Fluctuations
|
14
|
|
Liquidity and Capital
Resources
|
15
|
|
Cautionary Statement
|
17
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about
Market Risk
|
18
|
Interest Rate Risk
|
18
|
|
Foreign Exchange Risk
|
18
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
18
|
Part II.
|
Other Information
|
19
|
Item 6.
|
Exhibits
|
19
|
Signature
Page
|
20
|
|
Index
to Exhibits
|
21
|
Page
1
BEACON ROOFING
SUPPLY, INC.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance
Sheets
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Note)
|
||||||||||
March
31,
|
March
31,
|
September
30,
|
||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2009
|
||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 89,869 | $ | 98,106 | $ | 82,742 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable, less allowance of $12,469 at March 31, 2010, $14,216 at March
31, 2009, and $13,442 at September 30, 2009
|
162,080 | 166,939 | 227,379 | |||||||||
Inventories
|
220,163 | 207,042 | 195,011 | |||||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
55,835 | 45,045 | 52,714 | |||||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
16,342 | 22,664 | 19,323 | |||||||||
Total
current assets
|
544,289 | 539,796 | 577,169 | |||||||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
48,329 | 51,850 | 52,965 | |||||||||
Goodwill
|
358,749 | 352,319 | 354,193 | |||||||||
Other
assets, net
|
52,350 | 67,093 | 56,459 | |||||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 1,003,717 | $ | 1,011,058 | $ | 1,040,786 | ||||||
Liabilities
and stockholders' equity
|
||||||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 130,012 | $ | 158,166 | $ | 151,683 | ||||||
Accrued
expenses
|
60,750 | 70,226 | 75,536 | |||||||||
Current
portion of long-term obligations
|
8,639 | 15,066 | 15,092 | |||||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
199,401 | 243,458 | 242,311 | |||||||||
Senior
notes payable, net of current portion
|
320,449 | 330,750 | 322,090 | |||||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
36,034 | 34,858 | 36,555 | |||||||||
Long-term
obligations under equipment financing and other, net of current
portion
|
13,377 | 22,924 | 16,257 | |||||||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
||||||||||||
Stockholders'
equity:
|
||||||||||||
Common
stock (voting); $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 45,490,506
issued and outstanding at March 31, 2010, 45,072,897 at March 31, 2009,
and 45,244,837 at September 30, 2009
|
455 | 451 | 452 | |||||||||
Undesignated
preferred stock; 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or
outstanding
|
- | - | - | |||||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
231,690 | 222,982 | 226,793 | |||||||||
Retained
earnings
|
200,735 | 163,145 | 199,364 | |||||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
1,576 | (7,510 | ) | (3,036 | ) | |||||||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
434,456 | 379,068 | 423,573 | |||||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$ | 1,003,717 | $ | 1,011,058 | $ | 1,040,786 |
Note: The
balance sheet at September 30, 2009
has been
derived from the audited financial statements at that date.
The
accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Page
2
BEACON ROOFING
SUPPLY, INC.
Consolidated Statements of
Operations
Three Months Ended March
31,
|
Six Months Ended March 31,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Unaudited
|
||||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 285,366 | $ | 319,303 | $ | 653,087 | $ | 782,632 | ||||||||
Cost
of products sold
|
224,302 | 245,025 | 503,682 | 592,356 | ||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
61,064 | 74,278 | 149,405 | 190,276 | ||||||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
67,051 | 72,820 | 136,880 | 151,143 | ||||||||||||
Income
(loss) from operations
|
(5,987 | ) | 1,458 | 12,525 | 39,133 | |||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
5,499 | 5,589 | 11,086 | 11,738 | ||||||||||||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
(11,486 | ) | (4,131 | ) | 1,439 | 27,395 | ||||||||||
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
(5,030 | ) | (1,688 | ) | 68 | 11,196 | ||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | (6,456 | ) | $ | (2,443 | ) | $ | 1,371 | $ | 16,199 | ||||||
Net
income (loss) per share:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.36 | ||||||
Diluted
|
$ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | 0.03 | $ | 0.36 | ||||||
Weighted
average shares used in computing net income (loss) per
share:
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
45,397,905 | 44,941,782 | 45,338,943 | 44,881,846 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
|
45,397,905 | 44,941,782 | 45,830,171 | 45,339,821 |
The
accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Page
3
BEACON ROOFING
SUPPLY, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows
Six Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Unaudited
(in thousands)
|
||||||||
Operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 1,371 | $ | 16,199 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
14,015 | 15,311 | ||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
2,607 | 2,385 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
(406 | ) | (317 | ) | ||||
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
66,904 | 113,356 | ||||||
Inventories
|
(23,469 | ) | 269 | |||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
(2,657 | ) | 405 | |||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
(32,795 | ) | (62,763 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
25,570 | 84,845 | ||||||
Investing
activities:
|
||||||||
Purchases
of property and equipment, net of sales proceeds
|
(3,264 | ) | (4,761 | ) | ||||
Acquisition
of businesses
|
(6,618 | ) | - | |||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(9,882 | ) | (4,761 | ) | ||||
Financing
activities:
|
||||||||
Advances
(repayments) under revolving lines of credit, net
|
64 | (4,627 | ) | |||||
Repayments
under senior notes payable and other, net
|
(11,063 | ) | (4,188 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from exercise of options
|
1,812 | 845 | ||||||
Income
tax benefit from stock-based compensation deductions in excess of
the
|
||||||||
associated
compensation costs
|
480 | 86 | ||||||
Net
cash used by financing activities
|
(8,707 | ) | (7,884 | ) | ||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash
|
146 | (132 | ) | |||||
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
7,127 | 72,068 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
82,742 | 26,038 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 89,869 | $ | 98,106 | ||||
Cash
paid during the year for:
|
||||||||
Interest
|
$ | 11,300 | $ | 11,875 | ||||
Income
taxes, net of refunds
|
8,740 | 33,686 |
The
accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Page
4
BEACON
ROOFING SUPPLY, INC.
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1.
Basis of Presentation
Beacon
Roofing Supply, Inc. (the "Company") prepared the consolidated financial
statements following accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States (GAAP) for interim financial information and the requirements of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). As permitted under those rules,
certain footnotes or other financial information required by GAAP for complete
financial statements have been condensed or omitted. The balance sheet as of
March 31, 2009 has been presented for a better understanding of the impact of
seasonal fluctuations on the Company's financial condition.
On
October 1, 2009, the Company merged all of its U.S. subsidiaries into Beacon
Sales Acquisition, Inc. After this merger, the Company’s remaining subsidiaries
are Beacon Sales Acquisition, Inc., Beacon Canada, Inc. and Beacon Roofing
Supply Canada Company. The Company continues to operate its regional businesses
under trade names associated with the former subsidiary corporate
names.
In
management's opinion, the financial statements include all normal and recurring
adjustments that are considered necessary for the fair presentation of the
Company's financial position and operating results. The results for the
three-month period (second quarter) and the six-month period (year-to-date)
ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be
expected for the twelve months ending September 30, 2010.
The Company's fiscal year ends on the
last day in September of each year and each quarter ends on the last day of the
respective third calendar month. The six-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and
March 31, 2009 both had 125 business days, while the three-month periods ended
March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009 both had 63 business
days. Certain
reclassifications have been made to the prior year information to conform to the
current year presentation.
You
should also read the financial statements and notes included in the Company's
fiscal year 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The accounting policies used
in preparing these financial statements are the same as those described in that
Annual Report.
Adoption
of Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In March
2007, the FASB issued guidance that significantly changes the accounting for and
reporting of business combination transactions and noncontrolling (minority)
interests in consolidated financial statements. This guidance is effective for
the Company in fiscal year 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a
significant impact on the Company’s financial statements in the current year but
could have a material impact on the accounting for its future acquisitions,
depending on the circumstances and the terms of the acquisitions.
In April
2009, the FASB issued disclosure guidance about fair value of financial
instruments in interim financial statements. This was effective for the Company
beginning in the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 but had no impact on the
financial statements.
In May
2009, the FASB issued guidance on subsequent events that establishes general
standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the
balance sheet date and requires the disclosure of the date through which an
entity has evaluated subsequent events and whether that represents the date the
financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. The Company has
evaluated all subsequent events under this guidance.
In
June 2009, the FASB issued guidance related to the FASB Accounting
Standards Codification (“ASC”). Effective for interim and annual financial
periods ended after September 15, 2010, the ASC has become the source of
authoritative generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and
supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other
non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the ASC has
become non-authoritative. This new guidance affected the way in which the
Company references and reports accounting and reporting standards beginning with
its fiscal year 2009 Annual Report.
2.
Income (Loss) Per Share
The
Company calculates basic income (loss) per share by dividing net income (loss)
by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net income
per share includes the dilutive effects of outstanding stock
awards.
Page
5
BEACON
ROOFING SUPPLY, INC.
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Continued)
The
following table reflects the calculation of weighted-average shares outstanding
for each period presented:
Three Months Ended March
31,
|
Six Months Ended March 31,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Weighted-average
common shares outstanding for basic
|
45,397,905 | 44,941,782 | 45,338,943 | 44,881,846 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive
effect of stock options
|
- | - | 491,228 | 457,975 | ||||||||||||
Weighted-average
shares assuming dilution
|
45,397,905 | 44,941,782 | 45,830,171 | 45,339,821 |
3.
Stock-Based Compensation
The
Company accounts for employee and non-employee director stock-based compensation
using the fair value method of accounting. Compensation cost arising from stock
options granted to employees and non-employee directors is recognized as an
expense using the straight-line method over the vesting period, which represents
the requisite service period. The Company estimates forfeitures in calculating
the expense related to stock-based compensation.
As of
March 31, 2010, there was $8.0 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to unvested stock options. That cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 2.3 years. The Company recorded stock-based
compensation expense of $1.2 million ($0.7 million net of tax) in each of
the second quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 and $2.6 million ($1.5
million net of tax) and $2.4 million ($1.4 million net of tax) in the
six months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The fair
values of the options were estimated on the dates of grants using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average
assumptions:
Six Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Risk-free
interest rate
|
2.45 | % | 2.49 | % | ||||
Expected
life in years
|
7 | 7 | ||||||
Expected
volatility
|
48.00 | % | 48.00 | % | ||||
Dividend
yield
|
0.00 | % | 0.00 | % |
Expected
lives of the options granted are based primarily on history, while expected
volatilities are based on historical volatilities of the Company’s stock and
stocks of comparable public companies. Estimated forfeiture rates vary by grant
and ranged from 0%-10% as of March 31, 2010.
Page
6
BEACON
ROOFING SUPPLY, INC.
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Continued)
The
following table summarizes stock options outstanding as of March 31, 2010, as
well as activity during the six months then ended:
Weighted-
|
||||||||||||||||
Weighted-
|
Average
|
|||||||||||||||
Average
|
Remaining
|
Aggregate
|
||||||||||||||
Number of
|
Exercise
|
Contractual
|
Intrinsic
|
|||||||||||||
Shares
|
Price
|
Life
|
Value
|
|||||||||||||
(in
Years)
|
(in
Millions)
|
|||||||||||||||
Outstanding
at September 30, 2009
|
3,417,754 | $ | 13.70 | |||||||||||||
Granted
|
859,614 | 14.62 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(245,669 | ) | 7.37 | |||||||||||||
Canceled
|
(27,382 | ) | 15.72 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding
at March 31, 2010
|
4,004,317 | $ | 14.27 | 7.2 | $ | 21.9 | ||||||||||
Vested
or Expected to Vest at March 31, 2010
|
3,899,327 | $ | 14.29 | 7.2 | $ | 21.4 | ||||||||||
Exercisable
at March 31, 2010
|
2,441,178 | $ | 14.97 | 6.1 | $ | 12.6 |
The
aggregate intrinsic values above include only in-the-money options. As of March
31, 2010, there were remaining options to purchase 902,531 shares of common
stock available for grants under the Company's 2004 Stock Plan. The
weighted-average grant date fair values of stock options granted during the six
months ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009 were $7.59 and $6.35,
respectively. The intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the six
months ended March 31, 2010 and March 31, 2009 was $2.4 and $2.2 million,
respectively. At March 31, 2010, the Company had $14.7 million of excess
tax benefits available for potential deferred tax write-offs related to option
accounting.
4.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive
income (loss) consists of net income (loss) and other gains and losses affecting
stockholders' equity that, under GAAP, are excluded from net income. For the
Company, these consisted of the following items:
Unaudited
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
Six
Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands, except per share data)
|
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | (6,456 | ) | $ | (2,443 | ) | $ | 1,371 | $ | 16,199 | ||||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
1,466 | (1,147 | ) | 2,326 | (6,250 | ) | ||||||||||
Tax
effect
|
(513 | ) | 401 | (814 | ) | 2,366 | ||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustment, net
|
953 | (746 | ) | 1,512 | (3,884 | ) | ||||||||||
Unrealized
gain (loss) on financial derivatives
|
(455 | ) | 260 | 5,274 | (5,461 | ) | ||||||||||
Tax
effect
|
179 | (105 | ) | (2,174 | ) | 2,197 | ||||||||||
Unrealized
gain (loss) on financial derivatives, net
|
(276 | ) | 155 | 3,100 | (3,264 | ) | ||||||||||
Comprehensive
income (loss)
|
$ | (5,779 | ) | $ | (3,034 | ) | $ | 5,983 | $ | 9,051 |
5.
Acquisitions
In
February 2010, the Company purchased certain assets of Independent Building
Materials, LLC (“IBM”), a distributor of primarily residential roofing products
with one branch in Orlando, Florida. In December 2009, the Company purchased
certain assets of Lookout Supply Company (“Lookout”), a distributor of roofing
products and related accessories with one branch in Chattanooga, Tennessee. As
of March 31, 2010, the purchase price allocations for IBM and Lookout were
preliminary.
Page
7
BEACON
ROOFING SUPPLY, INC.
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Continued)
6.
Debt
The
Company currently has the following credit facilities:
|
•
|
a senior secured credit facility
in the U.S.;
|
|
•
|
a Canadian senior secured credit
facility; and
|
|
•
|
an
equipment financing facility.
|
Senior
Secured Credit Facilities
On
November 2, 2006, the Company entered into an amended and restated
seven-year $500 million U.S. senior secured credit facility and a
C$15 million senior secured Canadian credit facility with GE Antares
Capital ("GE Antares") and a syndicate of other lenders (combined, the "Credit
Facility"). The Credit Facility consists of a U.S. revolving credit facility of
$150 million, which includes a sub-facility of $20 million for letters
of credit, and an initial $350 million term loan (the "Term Loan"). The
Credit Facility also includes a C$15 million senior secured revolving
credit facility provided by GE Canada Finance Holding Company.
As of
March 31, 2010, there was approximately $0.1 million of outstanding revolver
borrowings and $323.8 million of outstanding Term Loan maturing in November
2013. The Company is in compliance with the covenants under the Credit Facility.
The current portion of long-term obligations at March 31, 2009 and September 30,
2009 included a $7 million accelerated payment that was due under the Term Loan.
The current year payment of $7 million was made early in February 2010.
Substantially all of the Company's assets, including the capital stock and
assets of wholly-owned subsidiaries secure obligations under the Credit
Facility.
Equipment
Financing Facility
There was
a total of $17.5 million of equipment financing loans outstanding under prior
equipment financing facilities at March 31, 2010, with fixed interest rates
ranging from 4.1% to 7.4% and payments due through September 2014. The Company’s
current equipment financing facility allows for the financing of up to $5.5
million of purchased transportation and material handling equipment through May
1, 2011 at an interest rate approximately 2% above the 5-year term swap rate at
the time of the advances. There were no amounts outstanding under this
facility at March 31, 2010.
7.
Foreign Net Revenue
Foreign
(Canadian) net revenue totaled $42.2 and $33.7 million in the six months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
8.
Financial Instruments
Financial
Derivatives
The
Company uses derivative financial instruments for hedging and non-trading
purposes to manage its exposure related to fluctuating cash flows from changes
in interest rates. Use of derivative financial instruments in hedging programs
subjects the Company to certain risks, such as market and credit risks. Market
risk represents the possibility that the value of the derivative instrument will
change. In a hedging relationship, the change in the value of the derivative is
offset to a great extent by the change in the value of the underlying hedged
item. Credit risk related to derivatives represents the possibility that the
counterparty will not fulfill the terms of the contract. The notional, or
contractual, amount of the Company's derivative financial instruments is used to
measure interest to be paid or received and does not represent the Company's
exposure due to credit risk. The Company's current derivative instruments are
with large financial counterparties rated highly by nationally recognized credit
rating agencies.
The
Company is using interest rate derivative instruments to manage the risk related
to fluctuating cash flows from interest rate changes by converting a portion of
its variable-rate borrowings into fixed-rate borrowings. As of March 31, 2010,
the following interest rate derivative instruments were outstanding:
a) interest rate swaps totaling $200 million, expiring in April 2010,
with a fixed rate of 4.97%; b) a $50 million interest rate collar
expiring in April 2010 with a floor rate of 3.99% and a cap rate of 5.75%;
c) a $50 million interest rate collar expiring in April 2010 with a
floor rate of 3.75% and a cap rate of 6.00%; d) a $100 million
future-starting interest rate swap, with interest cash flows commencing in April
2010 and expiring in April 2013 and with a fixed rate of 2.72%; e) a
$50 million future-starting interest rate swap, with interest
cash flows commencing in April 2010 and expiring in April 2013 and with a fixed
rate of 3.12%; and f) a $50 million future-starting interest rate swap,
with interest cash flows commencing in April 2010 and expiring in April 2013 and
with a fixed rate of 3.11%. At no time during the terms of the forward-stating
derivatives do the associated cash flows overlap with those associated with the
derivatives expiring in April 2010.
Page
8
BEACON
ROOFING SUPPLY, INC.
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(Continued)
These
derivative instruments are designated as cash flow hedges, for which the Company
records the effective portions of changes in their fair value, net of taxes, in
other comprehensive income (Note 4). The effectiveness of the hedges is
periodically assessed by the Company during the lives of the hedges by 1)
comparing the current terms of the hedges with the related hedged debt to assure
they continue to coincide and 2) through an evaluation of the counterparties to
the hedges to honor their obligations under the hedges. Any ineffective portion
of the hedges is recognized in earnings, of which there has been none to date
and none is anticipated.
The
Company records any differences paid or received on its interest rate hedges as
adjustments to interest expense. Since inception, the Company has not
recognized any gains or losses on these hedges and there has been no effect on
income from hedge ineffectiveness. The table below presents the combined
fair value of the interest rate swap and collar instruments:
Unrealized
Losses
|
|||||||||||||
March
31,
|
March
31,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||||||
Location
on Balance Sheet
|
2010
|
2009
|
2009
|
Fair Value Hierarchy
|
|||||||||
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||
Accrued
expenses
|
$ | 7,074 | $ | 12,857 | $ | 12,348 |
Level
2
|
The fair
values of the interest rate swaps and collars were determined through the use of
pricing models, which utilize verifiable inputs such as market interest rates
that are observable at commonly quoted intervals (generally referred to as the
“LIBOR Curve”) for the full terms of the swap and collar
agreements.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The
Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months
or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents also
include unsettled credit card transactions. As of March 31, 2010, the cash
equivalents were mostly comprised of money market funds, which invest primarily
in commercial paper or bonds with a rating of A-1 or better, and bank
certificates of deposit. The carrying values of the cash equivalents for the
periods presented equaled the fair values, which were determined under Level 1
of the Fair Value Hierarchy.
9.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June
2009, the FASB issued guidance that changes the way entities account for
securitizations and special purpose entities. This new guidance is effective for
annual reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company believes
this change will not have a material impact on its financial
statements.
10.
Subsequent Events
On April
12, 2010, the Company purchased certain assets of Phoenix Sales, Inc.
(“Phoenix”), a distributor of commercial roofing systems and related accessories
with four branches located in Tampa, Orlando, Pompano and Ft. Myers, Florida. On
April 16, 2010, the Company purchased certain assets of Louisiana Roofing Supply
(“LRS”), a distributor of mostly residential roofing systems and related
accessories with one location in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.
Page
9
Item 2. Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
You
should read the following discussion in conjunction with Management’s Discussion
and Analysis included in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Unless otherwise
specifically indicated, all references to “2010” and “YTD 2010” refer to the
three months (second quarter) and six months (year-to-date) ended March 31,
2010, respectively, of our fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, and all
references to “2009” and “YTD 2009” refer to the three months (second quarter)
and six months (year-to-date) ended March 31, 2009, respectively, of our fiscal
year ended September 30, 2009. Certain tabular information may not foot due
to rounding.
Overview
We are
one of the largest distributors of residential and non-residential roofing
materials in the United States and Canada. We are also a distributor of other
complementary building products, including siding, windows, specialty lumber
products and waterproofing systems for residential and non-residential building
exteriors. We purchase products from a large number of manufacturers and then
distribute these goods to a customer base consisting of contractors and, to a
lesser extent, general contractors, retailers and building materials
suppliers.
We
distribute up to 10,000 SKUs through 177 branches in the United States and
Canada. We had 2,114 employees as of March 31, 2010, including our sales and
marketing team of 906 employees.
In fiscal
year 2009, approximately 94% of our net sales were in the United States. We
stock one of the most extensive assortments of high-quality branded products in
the industry, enabling us to deliver products to our customers on a timely
basis.
Execution
of the operating plan at each of our branches drives our financial results.
Revenues are impacted by the relative strength of the residential and
non-residential roofing markets we serve. We allow each of our branches to
develop its own marketing plan and mix of products based upon its local market.
We differentiate ourselves from the competition by providing customer services,
including job site delivery, tapered insulation layouts and design and metal
fabrication, and by providing credit. We consider customer relations and our
employees' knowledge of roofing and exterior building materials to be very
important to our ability to increase customer loyalty and maintain customer
satisfaction. We invest significant resources in training our employees in sales
techniques, management skills and product knowledge. Although we consider these
attributes important drivers of our business, we continually pay close attention
to controlling operating costs.
Our
growth strategy includes both internal growth (opening branches, growing sales
with existing customers, adding new customers and introducing new products) and
acquisition growth. Our main acquisition strategy is to target market leaders in
geographic areas that we do not service. Our April 2007 acquisition of North
Coast Commercial Roofing Systems, Inc. ("North Coast") is one example of
this approach. North Coast is a distributor of commercial roofing systems and
related accessories that operated 16 branches in eight states in the Midwest and
Northeast at the time of the acquisition. North Coast had minimal branch overlap
with our existing operations. In addition, we also acquire smaller companies to
supplement branch openings within existing markets. Our December 2009
acquisition of Lookout Supply Company (“Lookout”), which operated one branch and
was integrated into our Mid-Atlantic region, is one example of such an
acquisition.
Page
10
Results of
Operations
The
following table presents, for the periods indicated, information derived from
our consolidated statements of operations expressed as a percentage of net sales
for the periods presented. Percentages may not foot due to
rounding.
Three Months Ended March
31,
|
Six Months Ended March 31,
|
|||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost
of products sold
|
78.6 | 76.7 | 77.1 | 75.7 | ||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
21.4 | 23.3 | 22.9 | 24.3 | ||||||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
23.5 | 22.8 | 21.0 | 19.3 | ||||||||||||
Income
(loss) from operations
|
(2.1 | ) | 0.5 | 1.9 | 5.0 | |||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(1.9 | ) | (1.8 | ) | (1.7 | ) | (1.5 | ) | ||||||||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
(4.0 | ) | (1.3 | ) | 0.2 | 3.5 | ||||||||||
Income
tax benefit (expense)
|
1.8 | 0.5 | - | (1.4 | ) | |||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
(2.3 | )% | (0.8 | )% | 0.2 | % | 2.1 | % |
In
managing our business, we consider all growth, including the opening of new
branches, to be internal (organic) growth unless it results from an acquisition.
When we have referred to growth in existing markets or internal growth in our
prior filings, we included growth from existing and newly opened branches but
excluded growth from acquired branches until they have been under our ownership
for at least four full fiscal quarters at the start of the fiscal reporting
period. At March 31, 2010, we had a total of 172 branches in operation, all of
which are considered existing-market branches. We deemed the acquisitions of
Lookout, our new Chattanooga branch, and IBM, our new Orlando branch immaterial
for reporting purposes.
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
("2010") Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
("2009")
Net
Sales
Consolidated
net sales decreased $33.9 million, or 10.6%, to $285.4 million in 2010
from $319.3 million in 2009. We attribute the sales decrease primarily to
the following factors:
|
·
|
decrease
in re-roofing activity in the areas affected by Hurricane Ike in
2009;
|
|
·
|
harsher
winter conditions in several markets;
and
|
|
·
|
continued
general weakness in residential and non-residential roofing activities in
some markets.
|
We closed
one branch and acquired one branch in this year’s second quarter, while we
closed two branches in last year’s second quarter. We estimate
inflation had no material impact on results in this quarter compared to last
year’s first quarter. We had 63 business days in both 2010 and
2009. Net sales by geographical region grew or (declined) as follows:
Northeast (7.0%); Mid-Atlantic 4.9%; Southeast 2.5%; Southwest (39.1%); Midwest
(4.1%); West (21.3%); and Canada 42.0%. These variations were primarily caused
by short-term factors such as local economic conditions, winter weather
conditions, and previous year’s storm activity. Included in our 2010 sales was
$1.5 million of primarily residential roofing sales from our two newly acquired
branches, which represented 47 basis points of growth. Actual organic
contraction was therefore 11.1%. Our total product group sales were
as follows:
For the Three Months
Ended
March
31,
|
March
31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales
|
Mix
|
Sales
|
Mix
|
Change
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential
roofing products
|
$ | 143,018 | 50.1 | % | $ | 172,236 | 53.9 | % | $ | (29,218 | ) | -17.0 | % | |||||||||||
Non-residential
roofing products
|
96,769 | 33.9 | % | 101,202 | 31.7 | % | (4,433 | ) | -4.4 | |||||||||||||||
Complementary
building products
|
45,579 | 16.0 | % | 45,865 | 14.4 | % | (286 | ) | -0.6 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 285,366 | 100.0 | % | $ | 319,303 | 100.0 | % | $ | (33,937 | ) | -10.6 | % |
Page
11
Gross
Profit
For
the Three Months Ended
March
31,
|
March
31,
|
||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
Change
|
|||||||||||||||
(dollars
in millions)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
$ | 61.1 | $ | 74.3 | $ | (13.2 | ) | -17.8 | % | ||||||||
Gross
margin
|
21.4 | % | 23.3 | % |
-1.9%
|
Our
gross profit decreased $13.2 million or 17.8% in 2010, while our gross
margin also decreased to 21.4% in 2010 from 23.3% in 2009. The margin
rate decrease was the result of a more competitive market in a seasonally
slower-than-normal quarter, an increase in sales to lumberyards and other
similar end-sellers, commonly referred to as two-step sales, and a slightly
higher sales mix of non-residential roofing products, which have lower gross
margins. These negative factors were partially offset by higher 2010 vendor
incentive income, primarily from short-term buying programs.
Direct
sales (products shipped by our vendors directly to our customers), which
typically have substantially lower gross margins than our warehouse sales,
represented 21.9% and 18.9% of our net sales for 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The increase in the percentage of direct sales was attributable to the higher
mix of non-residential roofing product sales and the increase in our two-step
sales mentioned above, especially in our Midwest region. Beyond those changes,
there were no other material regional impacts from changes in the direct sales
mix of our geographical regions.
Operating
Expenses
For
the Three Months Ended
March
31,
|
March
31,
|
||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
Change
|
|||||||||||||||
(dollars
in millions)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
$ | 67.1 | $ | 72.8 | $ | (5.7 | ) | -7.9 | % | ||||||||
Operating
expenses as a % of sales
|
23.5 | % | 22.8 | % |
0.7%
|
Our
operating expenses decreased by $5.7 million or 7.9% in 2010 to
$67.1 million, including $0.5 million in expenses at our two recently
acquired branches, from $72.8 million in 2009. The following factors were
the leading causes of our lower operating expenses:
|
·
|
savings of $2.8 million in
payroll and related costs, due to a lower employee headcount, lower
incentive-based pay, and a lower profit-sharing
accrual;
|
|
·
|
savings
of $2.2 million in other general & administrative expenses, from a
reduction in the provision for bad debts of $1.8 million and certain cost
saving actions; and
|
|
·
|
reduced
depreciation and amortization expense of $0.8 million due to lower
amortization of intangible assets.
|
In
2010, we expensed a total of $2.4 million for the amortization of
intangible assets recorded under purchase accounting compared to
$3.0 million in 2009. Our operating expenses as a percentage
of net sales increased to 23.5% in 2010 from 22.8% in 2009 as we were unable to
reduce costs to the extent of the large drop in sales.
Interest
Expense
Interest
expense decreased $0.1 million to $5.5 million in 2010 from
$5.6 million in 2009. This decrease was primarily due to a paydown of debt,
partially offset by slightly higher average interest rates in 2010 that affected
the unhedged portion of our variable-rate debt. Interest expense
would have been $3.1 and $2.3 million less in 2010 and 2009, respectively,
without the impact of our derivatives.
Page
12
Income
Taxes
An
income tax benefit of $5.0 million was recorded in 2010, an effective tax
benefit of 43.8%, compared to $1.7 million in 2009, an effective
tax benefit of 40.9%. The increase in the effective benefit rate includes the
beneficial impact of a $0.5 million reversal of a discrete tax reserve and a
higher percentage of Canadian income in 2010 than in 2009. We
currently expect our full fiscal year 2010 effective income tax rate to be
approximately 39.4%, excluding any future discrete items.
Six Months Ended March 31, 2010 ("YTD
2010") Compared to the Six Months Ended March 31, 2009 ("YTD
2009")
Net
Sales
Consolidated
net sales decreased $129.5 million, or 16.6%, to $653.1 million in YTD
2010 from $782.6 million in YTD 2009. We attribute the sales decrease
primarily to the same factors mentioned above for the second quarter, although
the YTD 2010 non-residential sales decrease was larger due to a more significant
decline in the first quarter compared to the second quarter. The impact from inflation on YTD 2010
sales was immaterial. We closed one branch and acquired two in YTD 2010, while
we closed six branches in YTD 2009. We had 125 business days in both
YTD 2010 and YTD 2009. Included in our YTD 2010 sales was $1.5
million of primarily residential roofing sales from our two newly acquired
branches, which represented 19 basis points of growth. Actual organic
contraction was therefore 16.8%. Our total product group sales were
as follows:
For
the Six Months Ended
March
31,
|
March
31,
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales
|
Mix
|
Sales
|
Mix
|
Change
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential
roofing products
|
$ | 316,252 | 48.4 | % | $ | 406,973 | 52.0 | % | $ | (90,721 | ) | -22.3 | % | |||||||||||
Non-residential
roofing products
|
236,022 | 36.1 | % | 265,958 | 34.0 | % | (29,936 | ) | -11.3 | |||||||||||||||
Complementary
building products
|
100,813 | 15.4 | % | 109,701 | 14.0 | % | (8,888 | ) | -8.1 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 653,087 | 100.0 | % | $ | 782,632 | 100.0 | % | $ | (129,545 | ) | -16.6 | % |
Gross
Profit
For
the Six Months Ended
March
31,
|
March
31,
|
||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
Change
|
|||||||||||||||
(dollars
in millions)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
$ | 149.4 | $ | 190.3 | $ | (40.9 | ) | -21.5 | % | ||||||||
Gross
margin
|
22.9 | % | 24.3 | % |
-1.4%
|
Our
gross profit decreased $40.9 million or 21.5% in YTD 2010, while our gross
margin also decreased to 22.9% in YTD 2010 from 24.3% in YTD 2009. In
addition to the factors mentioned for the quarter, the YTD 2010 margin rate
decrease was also the result of lower weighted-average costs of residential
roofing products (in comparison to the prices of those products in the
marketplace) that benefitted the early 2009 margin. We continue to
expect our future overall annual gross margin average to range from 23-24.5%,
dependant upon product mix.
Page
13
Operating
Expenses
For
the Six Months Ended
March
31,
|
March
31,
|
||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
Change
|
|||||||||||||||
(dollars
in millions)
|
|||||||||||||||||
Operating
expenses
|
$ | 136.9 | $ | 151.1 | $ | (14.2 | ) | -9.4 | % | ||||||||
Operating
expenses as a % of sales
|
21.0 | % | 19.3 | % |
1.7%
|
Our
operating expenses decreased by $14.2 million or 9.4% in YTD 2010 to
$136.9 million, including $0.5 million of expenses at our two recently
acquired branches, from $151.1 million in YTD 2009. The following factors
were the leading causes of our lower operating expenses:
|
·
|
savings of $7.0 million in
payroll and related costs, due to a lower employee headcount, a reduction
in overtime, lower incentive-based pay, and lower related benefits
(including a lower profit-sharing
accrual);
|
|
·
|
savings
of $4.0 million in other general & administrative expenses, from a
reduction in the provision for bad debts of $2.6 million, reduced claim
costs in our self-insurance programs and from other cost saving
actions;
|
|
·
|
savings
of $1.6 million in various selling expenses, such as reduced credit card
fees due to the lower sales volume and certain cost saving
actions;
|
|
·
|
reduced
depreciation and amortization expense of $1.3 million due to lower
amortization of intangible assets;
and
|
|
·
|
savings
of $0.3 million in warehouse expenses resulting mainly from lower branch
closing costs.
|
In
YTD 2010, we expensed a total of $5.0 million for the amortization of
intangible assets recorded under purchase accounting compared to
$6.2 million in YTD 2009. Our operating expenses as a percentage
of net sales increased to 21.0% in 2010 from 19.3% in 2009 as we were unable to
reduce costs to the extent of the large drop in sales.
Interest
Expense
Interest
expense decreased $0.6 million to $11.1 million in YTD 2010 from
$11.7 million in YTD 2009. This decrease was primarily due to a
paydown of debt, partially offset by slightly higher average interest rates in
YTD 2010 that affected the unhedged portion of our variable-rate
debt. Interest expense would have been $6.4 and $2.8 million less in
YTD 2010 and 2009, respectively, without the impact of our
derivatives.
Income
Taxes
Income
tax expense of $0.1 million was recorded in YTD 2010, an effective tax rate
of 4.7%, compared to an income tax expense of $11.2 million in YTD 2009, an
effective tax rate of 40.9%. The income tax expense for YTD 2010 includes the
benefits from the reversal of a $0.5 million discrete tax reserve and a higher
percentage of Canadian income in YTD 2010 than in YTD 2009. Without those
benefits, our effective tax rate would have been 39.5%.
Seasonality
and Quarterly Fluctuations
In
general, sales and net income are highest during our first, third and fourth
fiscal quarters, which represent the peak months of construction and reroofing,
especially in our branches in the northeastern U.S. and in Canada. Our sales are
substantially lower during the second quarter, when we historically have
incurred low net income levels or net losses.
We
generally experience an increase in inventory, accounts receivable and accounts
payable during the third and fourth quarters of the year as a result of the
seasonality of our business. Our peak borrowing level generally occurs during
the third quarter, primarily because dated accounts payable offered by our
suppliers typically are payable in April, May and June, while our peak accounts
receivable collections typically occur from June through November.
We
generally experience a slowing of collections of our accounts receivable during
our second quarter, mainly due to the inability of some of our customers to
conduct their businesses effectively in inclement weather in certain of our
regions. We continue to attempt to collect those receivables, which require
payment under our standard terms. We do not provide any concessions to our
customers during this quarter of the year, although we may take advantage of
seasonal incentives from our vendors. Also during the second quarter, we
generally experience our lowest availability under our senior secured credit
facilities, which are asset-based lending facilities.
Page
14
Certain
Quarterly Financial Data
The
following table sets forth certain unaudited quarterly data for fiscal year 2010
(ending September 30, 2010) and fiscal year 2009 which, in the opinion of
management, reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments)
considered necessary for a fair presentation of this data. Results of any one or
more quarters are not necessarily indicative of results for an entire fiscal
year or of continuing trends. Totals may not total due to rounding.
Fiscal year 2010
|
Fiscal
year 2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Qtr 1
|
Qtr 2
|
Qtr 1
|
Qtr 2
|
Qtr 3
|
Qtr 4
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(dollars
in millions, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 367.7 | $ | 285.4 | $ | 463.3 | $ | 319.3 | $ | 463.6 | $ | 487.7 | ||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
88.3 | 61.1 | 116.0 | 74.3 | 107.8 | 113.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income
(loss) from operations
|
18.5 | (6.0 | ) | 37.7 | 1.5 | 33.6 | 36.5 | |||||||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ | 7.8 | $ | (6.5 | ) | $ | 18.6 | $ | (2.4 | ) | $ | 17.2 | $ | 19.0 | ||||||||||
Earnings
(loss) per share - basic
|
$ | 0.17 | $ | (0.14 | ) | $ | 0.42 | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.42 | ||||||||||
Earnings
(loss) per share - fully diluted
|
$ | 0.17 | $ | (0.14 | ) | $ | 0.41 | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | 0.38 | $ | 0.42 | ||||||||||
Quarterly
sales as % of year's sales
|
26.7 | % | 18.4 | % | 26.7 | % | 28.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Quarterly
gross profit as % of year's gross profit
|
28.2 | % | 18.1 | % | 26.2 | % | 27.5 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Quarterly
income from operations as % of
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
year's
income from operations
|
34.5 | % | 1.4 | % | 30.7 | % | 33.4 | % |
The
calculations of the net loss per share for the second quarters of fiscal year
2010 and 2009 do not include the effect of stock options since the impact would
have been anti-dilutive.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
We
had cash and cash equivalents of $89.9 million at March 31, 2010 compared
to $98.1 million at March 31, 2009 and $82.7 million at
September 30, 2009. Our net working capital was $344.9 million at
March 31, 2010 compared to $296.3 million at March 31, 2009 and
$334.9 million at September 30, 2009.
YTD
2010 Compared to YTD 2009
Our
net cash provided by operating activities was $25.6 million in YTD 2010
compared to $84.8 million in YTD 2009. The lower cash from operations was
partially due to the drop of $26.6 million in our income from operations. In
addition, inventory increased $23.5 million, as we increased purchases during
the quarter in anticipation of price increases. Furthermore, we saw a decrease
of $32.8 million in accounts payable and accrued expenses, primarily due to
normal seasonal declines, partially offset by the impact from the higher second
quarter purchasing levels and much lower income tax payments in YTD 2010 than in
YTD 2009. Accounts receivable decreased by $66.9 million in 2010 primarily due
to a normal seasonal decline and lower second quarter sales. Due mostly to the
large decrease in sales, the number of days outstanding for accounts receivable,
based upon YTD 2010 sales, were higher compared to YTD 2009, while inventory
turns were down due to the lower sales and the higher inventory
level.
Net
cash used in investing activities was $9.9 million in YTD 2010 compared to
$4.8 million in YTD 2009, mainly due to the acquisitions of IBM and
Lookout, partially offset by lower capital spending for transportation and
material handling equipment. We continue to closely manage our capital
expenditures during these challenging economic times and we expect full fiscal
year 2010 capital expenditures to total between 0.7% to 1.0% of net sales,
mostly dependant upon our sales volume and exclusive of the impact of branch
openings.
Net
cash used by financing activities was $8.7 million in YTD 2010 compared to
$7.9 million in YTD 2009. These amounts primarily reflected repayments
under our credit facilities, including the $7 million excess cash flow payment
made earlier this year.
Capital
Resources
Our
principal source of liquidity at March 31, 2010 was our cash and cash
equivalents of $89.9 million and our available borrowings of $130.1 million
under revolving lines of credit, subject to compliance with the maximum
consolidated leverage ratio below. Our borrowing base availability is determined
primarily by trade accounts receivable, less outstanding borrowings and letters
of credit. Borrowings outstanding under the revolving lines of credit in the
accompanying balance sheets have been classified as short-term debt since there
were no current expectations of a minimum level of outstanding revolver
borrowings in the following twelve months.
Liquidity
is defined as the current amount of readily available cash and the ability to
generate adequate amounts of cash to meet the current needs for cash. We assess
our liquidity in terms of our cash and cash equivalents on hand and the ability
to generate cash to fund our operating activities, taking into consideration the
seasonal nature of our business.
Significant
factors which could affect future liquidity include the
following:
Page
15
|
·
|
the adequacy of available bank
lines of credit;
|
|
·
|
the ability to attract long-term
capital with satisfactory
terms;
|
|
·
|
cash flows generated from
operating activities;
|
|
·
|
acquisitions;
and
|
|
·
|
capital
expenditures.
|
Our
primary capital needs are for working capital obligations and other general
corporate purposes, including acquisitions and capital expenditures. Our primary
sources of working capital are cash from operations and cash equivalents
supplemented by bank borrowings. In the past, we have financed acquisitions
initially through increased bank borrowings, the issuance of common stock and
other borrowings. We then repay any such borrowings with cash flows from
operations. We have funded most of our past capital expenditures with cash on
hand or through increased bank borrowings, including equipment financing, and
then have reduced those obligations with cash flows from
operations.
We
believe we have adequate current liquidity and availability of capital to fund
our present operations, meet our commitments on our existing debt and fund
anticipated growth, including expansion in existing and targeted market areas.
We seek potential acquisitions from time to time and hold discussions with
certain acquisition candidates. If suitable acquisition opportunities or working
capital needs arise that would require additional financing, we believe that our
financial position and earnings history provide a sufficient base for obtaining
additional financing resources at reasonable rates and terms, as we have in the
past. We may also issue additional shares of common stock to raise funds, which
we did in December 2005, or we may issue preferred stock.
Indebtedness
We
currently have the following credit facilities:
|
•
|
a senior secured credit facility
in the U.S.;
|
|
•
|
a Canadian senior secured credit
facility; and
|
|
•
|
an
equipment financing facility.
|
Senior
Secured Credit Facilities
On
November 2, 2006, we entered into an amended and restated seven-year
$500 million U.S. senior secured credit facility and a C$15 million
senior secured Canadian credit facility with GE Antares Capital ("GE Antares")
and a syndicate of other lenders (combined, the "Credit Facility"). The Credit
Facility provides for a cash receipts lock-box arrangement that gives us sole
control over the funds in lock-box accounts, unless excess availability is less
than $10 million or an event of default occurs, in which case the senior
secured lenders would have the right to take control over such funds and to
apply such funds to repayment of the senior debt.
The
Credit Facility consists of a U.S. revolving credit facility of
$150 million (the "US Revolver"), which includes a sub-facility of
$20 million for letters of credit, and provided an initial
$350 million term loan (the "Term Loan"). The Credit Facility also includes
a C$15 million senior secured revolving credit facility provided by GE
Canada Finance Holding Company (the "Canada Revolver"). There was a combined
$130.1 million available for revolver borrowings at March 31, 2010, subject
to compliance with the maximum consolidated leverage ratio below, with less than
$0.1 million outstanding under the US Revolver at an interest rate of
3.25%. Borrowings outstanding under the revolving lines of credit in
the accompanying balance sheets were classified as short-term debt since there
were no current expectations of a minimum level of outstanding revolver
borrowings in the following twelve months. There were $4.8, $5.1 and $5.1
million of outstanding standby letters of credit at March 31, 2010, March 31,
2009 and September 30, 2009, respectively. The Term Loan requires
amortization of 1% per year, payable in quarterly installments of approximately
$0.9 million, and the remainder is due in 2013. The Credit Facility may
also be expanded by up to an additional $200 million under certain
conditions. There are mandatory prepayments under the Credit Facility under
certain conditions, including the following cash flow condition:
Excess
Cash Flow
By
May 15 of each fiscal year, we must pay an amount equal to 50% of the
Excess Cash Flow (as defined in the Credit Facility) for the prior fiscal year,
not to exceed $7.0 million with respect to any fiscal year. Based on our
results for fiscal year 2009, a required payment of $7.0 million was made early
in February 2010. A payment of $7.0 million was made in April 2009 for fiscal
year 2008. The amounts payable under this provision are classified as short-term
debt.
Page
16
Interest
Interest
on borrowings under the U.S. credit facility is payable at our election at
either of the following rates:
|
·
|
the base rate (that is the higher
of (a) the base rate for corporate loans quoted in The Wall Street Journal
or (b) the Federal Reserve overnight rate plus 1/2 of 1%) plus a margin of
0.75% for the Term Loan, or
|
|
·
|
the current LIBOR Rate plus a
margin of 1.00% (for U.S. Revolver loans) or 2.00% (for Term
Loan).
|
Interest
under the Canadian credit facility is payable at our election at either of the
following rates:
|
·
|
an
index rate (that is the higher of (1) the Canadian prime rate as
quoted in The Globe and Mail and (2) the 30-day BA Rate plus 0.75%),
or
|
|
·
|
the BA rate as described in the
Canadian facility plus
1.00%.
|
The
US Revolver currently carries an interest rate at the base rate (3.25% at March
31, 2010), while the Canada revolver carries an interest rate of the Canadian
prime rate plus 0.75% (3.00% at March 31, 2010), and the Term Loan carries an
interest rate of LIBOR plus 2% (2.25% for both of the LIBOR arrangements under
the Term Loan at March 31, 2010). Unused fees on the revolving credit facilities
are 0.25% per annum. Availability under the revolving credit facilities is
limited to 85% of eligible accounts receivable, increasing to 90% from January
through April of each year.
Financial
covenants, which apply only to the Term Loan, are limited to a leverage ratio
and a yearly capital expenditure limitation as follows:
Maximum
Consolidated Leverage Ratio
On
the last day of each fiscal quarter, our Consolidated Leverage Ratio, as
defined, must not be greater than 4.00:1.0. At March 31, 2010, this ratio was
2.20:1.
Capital
Expenditures
We
cannot incur aggregate Capital Expenditures, as defined, in excess of three
percent (3.00%) of consolidated gross revenue for any fiscal year.
As
of March 31, 2010, we were in compliance with these covenants.
Substantially
all of our assets, including the capital stock and assets of wholly-owned
subsidiaries secure obligations under the Credit
Facility.
Equipment
Financing Facility
There
was a total of $17.5 million of equipment financing loans outstanding under
prior equipment financing facilities at March 31, 2010, with fixed interest
rates ranging from 4.1% to 7.4% and payments due through September 2014. The
Company currently has an equipment financing facility that allows for the
financing of up to $5.5 million of purchased transportation and material
handling equipment through May 1, 2011 at an interest rate approximately 2%
above the 5-year term swap rate at the time of the advances. There were no
amounts outstanding under this facility at March 31, 2010.
Cautionary
Statement for Purposes of the "Safe Harbor" Provisions of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995
Our
disclosure and analysis in this report contains forward-looking information that
involves risks and uncertainties. Our forward-looking statements express our
current expectations or forecasts of possible future results or events,
including projections of future performance, statements of management's plans
and objectives, future contracts, and forecasts of trends and other matters. You
can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to
historic or current facts and often use words such as "anticipate," "estimate,"
"expect," "believe," "will likely result," "outlook," "project" and other words
and expressions of similar meaning. No assurance can be given that the results
in any forward-looking statements will be achieved and actual results could be
affected by one or more factors, which could cause them to differ materially.
For these statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for
forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act.
Page
17
Certain
factors that may affect our business and could cause actual results to differ
materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements include those
set forth under the heading "Risk Factors" in our Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2009.
Item 3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Interest
Rate Risk
Our
interest rate risk relates primarily to the variable-rate borrowings under our
Credit Facility. The following discussion of our interest rate swaps and collars
(see "Financial Derivatives" below) is based on a 10% change in interest rates.
These changes are hypothetical scenarios used to calibrate potential risk and do
not represent our view of future market changes. As the hypothetical figures
discussed below indicate, changes in fair value based on the assumed change in
rates generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in
assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. The effect of a
variation in a particular assumption is calculated without changing any other
assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another,
which may magnify or counteract the sensitivities.
At
March 31, 2010, we had $323.8 million of term loans outstanding under our
Credit Facility, less than $0.1 million of borrowings under revolving lines
of credit, and $17.5 million of equipment financing outstanding. Our
weighted-average effective interest rate on that debt, after considering the
effect of the interest rate swaps, was 6.26% at March 31, 2010 (6.12% at March
31, 2009). As noted below, certain of our financial derivatives expire in early
April 2010 and are being replaced with three new future interest rate
swaps. If these future swaps had been in effect at March 31, 2010,
the weighted-average effective interest rate of our debt would have been
approximately 4.0%. Regarding the swaps actually in effect at March
31, 2010, a hypothetical 10% increase in interest rates in effect at that date
would have increased annual interest expense by only $0.1 million, since
most of the interest expense was fixed by the financial
derivatives.
We
enter into interest rate swaps and collars to minimize the risks and costs
associated with financing activities, as well as to maintain an appropriate mix
of fixed-and floating-rate debt. The swap agreements discussed below are
contracts to exchange variable-rate for fixed-interest rate payments over the
life of the agreements. The collar agreements, also discussed below, provide for
fixed-rate caps and floors. The aggregate fair value of these swaps and collars
represented an unrealized loss of $7.1 million at March 31, 2010. A
hypothetical increase (or decrease) of 10% in interest rates from the level in
effect at March 31, 2010, would result in an aggregate unrealized gain or (loss)
in value of the swaps and collars of approximately $0.1 million or
($0.1) million, respectively.
Financial
Derivatives
As
discussed above, we use interest rate derivative instruments to manage our
exposure related to fluctuating cash flows from changes in interest rates by
converting a portion of our variable-rate borrowings into fixed-rate borrowings.
As of March 31, 2010, we had the following interest rate derivative instruments
outstanding: a) interest rate swaps totaling $200 million, expiring in
April 2010, with a fixed rate of 4.97%; b) a $50 million interest rate
collar expiring in April 2010 with a floor rate of 3.99% and a cap rate of
5.75%; c) a $50 million interest rate collar expiring in April 2010
with a floor rate of 3.75% and a cap rate of 6.00%; d) a $100 million
future-starting interest rate swap executed in May 2010, with interest cash
flows commencing in April 2010 and expiring in April 2013 and with a fixed rate
of 2.72%; e) a $50 million future-starting interest rate swap executed in
June 2010, with interest cash flows commencing in April 2010 and expiring in
April 2013 and with a fixed rate of 3.12%; and f) a $50 million
future-starting interest rate swap executed in June 2010, with interest cash
flows commencing in April 2010 and expiring in April 2013 and with a fixed rate
of 3.11%. At no time during the terms of the forward-stating derivatives do the
associated cash flows overlap with those associated with the derivatives
expiring in April 2010.
Foreign
Exchange Risk
There
have been no material changes from what we reported in our Form 10-K for
the year ended September 30, 2010.
Item 4. Controls
and Procedures
The
term "disclosure controls and procedures" is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act"). The rules refer to
the controls and other procedures designed to ensure that information required
to be disclosed in reports that we file or submit under the Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified. As of
March 31, 2010, management, including the CEO and CFO, performed an evaluation
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures. Based on that evaluation, management, including the CEO and CFO,
concluded that as of March 31, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective at ensuring that material information related to us or our
consolidated subsidiaries is made known to them and is disclosed on a timely
basis in our reports filed under the Act. We maintain a system of internal
control over financial reporting that is designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. Based on the most recent
evaluation, we have concluded that no significant change in our internal control
over financial reporting occurred during the last fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
Page
18
Part II.
Other Information
Items 1-4
are not applicable and have been omitted.
Item 5. Other
Information
Our
Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on February 5, 2010 to ratify the
selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company’s auditors for the fiscal year
ending September 30, 2010 and to elect a board of seven directors.
The
numbers of votes to ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP were as
follows:
VOTES FOR
|
VOTES AGAINST
|
VOTES ABSTAINED
|
||
41,947,824
|
644,450
|
81,663
|
The
numbers of votes for each director nominee were as follows:
DIRECTOR NOMINEE
|
VOTES FOR
|
VOTES WITHHELD
|
||||||
Robert
R. Buck
|
37,741,653 | 1,538,974 | ||||||
Andrew
R. Logie
|
39,046,266 | 234,361 | ||||||
H.
Arthur Bellows, Jr.
|
39,151,006 | 129,621 | ||||||
James
J. Gaffney
|
38,678,911 | 601,716 | ||||||
Peter
M. Gotsch
|
37,662,413 | 1,618,214 | ||||||
Stuart
A. Randle
|
38,803,983 | 476,644 | ||||||
Wilson
B. Sexton
|
38,806,913 | 473,714 |
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) Exhibits required by
Item 601 of Regulation S-K
Exhibit
Number
|
Document Description
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
by Robert R. Buck pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
by David R. Grace pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
by Robert R. Buck and David R. Grace pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
Page
19
Signature Page
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized on May 7, 2010.
BEACON
ROOFING SUPPLY, INC.
|
|||
BY:
|
/s/
DAVID R. GRACE
|
||
David R. Grace,
Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer, and duly
authorized signatory on behalf of the Registrant
|
Page
20
Index to
Exhibits
Exhibit
Number
|
Document
Description
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
by Robert R. Buck pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
by David R. Grace pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as
adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
by Robert R. Buck and David R. Grace pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
Page
21