BEAZER HOMES USA INC - Quarter Report: 2007 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2007
or
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
Commission
File Number 001-12822
BEAZER
HOMES USA, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE
|
58-2086934
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
employer
|
incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
no.)
|
1000
Abernathy Road, Suite 1200, Atlanta, Georgia 30328
(Address
of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(770)
829-3700
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
YES
|
x
|
NO
|
o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated
filer and large accelerated file” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check
One):
Large
accelerated filer
|
x
|
Accelerated
filer
|
o
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
o
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange
Act).
YES
|
o
|
NO
|
x
|
Class
|
Outstanding
at April 20, 2007
|
|
Common
Stock, $0.001 par value
|
39,102,650
shares
|
BEAZER
HOMES USA, INC.
FORM
10-Q
INDEX
3
|
||
3
|
||
3
|
||
4
|
||
5
|
||
6
|
||
26
|
||
39
|
||
40
|
||
40
|
||
40
|
||
42
|
||
42
|
||
42
|
||
43
|
||
43
|
The
Company’s Audit Committee is performing an independent internal review as
described in Part II, Item 1 of this report. As a result, the financial
information in this report has not been reviewed by the Company’s independent
registered public accounting firm as required by Section 10-01(d) of Regulation
S-X.
2
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1. Financial Statements
The
Company’s Audit Committee is performing an independent internal review as
described in Part II, Item 1 of this report. As a result, the financial
information in this report has not been reviewed by the Company’s independent
registered public accounting firm as required by Section 10-01(d) of Regulation
S-X.
BEAZER
HOMES USA, INC.
UNAUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in
thousands, except share and per share data)
March
31,
2007 |
September
2006 |
||||||
ASSETS
|
|
||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
218,841
|
$
|
162,570
|
|||
Restricted
cash
|
5,641
|
9,873
|
|||||
Accounts
receivable
|
66,093
|
333,571
|
|||||
Inventory
|
|||||||
Owned
inventory
|
2,909,285
|
3,048,891
|
|||||
Consolidated
inventory not owned
|
462,296
|
471,441
|
|||||
Total
inventory
|
3,371,581
|
3,520,332
|
|||||
Residential
mortgage loans available-for-sale
|
10,337
|
92,157
|
|||||
Investments
in unconsolidated joint ventures
|
128,355
|
122,799
|
|||||
Deferred
tax assets
|
110,864
|
59,842
|
|||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
25,936
|
29,465
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
121,368
|
121,368
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
132,008
|
107,454
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
4,191,024
|
$
|
4,559,431
|
|||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
|||||||
Trade
accounts payable
|
$
|
87,294
|
$
|
141,131
|
|||
Other
payables and accrued liabilities
|
402,493
|
547,014
|
|||||
Obligations
related to consolidated inventory not owned
|
335,629
|
330,703
|
|||||
Senior
notes (net of discounts of $3,302 and $3,578,
respectively)
|
1,531,698
|
1,551,422
|
|||||
Junior
subordinated notes
|
103,093
|
103,093
|
|||||
Warehouse
line
|
9,350
|
94,881
|
|||||
Other
notes payable
|
118,332
|
89,264
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
2,587,889
|
2,857,508
|
|||||
Stockholders’
equity:
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock (par value $.01 per share, 5,000,000 shares
authorized,
no shares issued)
|
—
|
—
|
|||||
Common
stock (par value $.001 per share, 80,000,000 shares authorized,
42,532,520 and 42,318,098 issued and 39,100,752 and 38,889,554
outstanding, respectively)
|
43
|
42
|
|||||
Paid-in
capital
|
539,628
|
528,376
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
1,253,057
|
1,362,958
|
|||||
Treasury
stock, at cost (3,431,768 and 3,428,544 shares,
respectively)
|
(189,593
|
)
|
(189,453
|
)
|
|||
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
1,603,135
|
1,701,923
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$
|
4,191,024
|
$
|
4,559,431
|
See
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3
BEAZER
HOMES USA, INC.
UNAUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in
thousands, except per share data)
Three
Months Ended March
31, |
Six
Months Ended March
31, |
||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Total
revenue
|
$
|
826,295
|
$
|
1,269,091
|
$
|
1,629,309
|
$
|
2,374,707
|
|||||
Home
construction and land sales expenses
|
701,029
|
944,992
|
1,363,011
|
1,774,851
|
|||||||||
Inventory
impairments and option contract abandonments
|
79,854
|
9,604
|
199,777
|
12,531
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit
|
45,412
|
314,495
|
66,521
|
587,325
|
|||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
109,729
|
149,793
|
225,097
|
282,871
|
|||||||||
Operating
(loss) income
|
(64,317
|
)
|
164,702
|
(158,576
|
)
|
304,454
|
|||||||
Equity
in (loss) income of unconsolidated joint ventures
|
(7,692
|
)
|
330
|
(10,052
|
)
|
682
|
|||||||
Other
income, net
|
2,694
|
1,582
|
4,687
|
5,685
|
|||||||||
(Loss)
income before income taxes
|
(69,315
|
)
|
166,614
|
(163,941
|
)
|
310,821
|
|||||||
(Benefit)
provision for income taxes
|
(26,226
|
)
|
62,263
|
(61,846
|
)
|
116,557
|
|||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$
|
(43,089
|
)
|
$
|
104,351
|
$
|
(102,095
|
)
|
$
|
194,264
|
|||
Weighted
average number of shares:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
38,427
|
40,442
|
38,353
|
40,703
|
|||||||||
Diluted
|
38,427
|
45,066
|
38,353
|
45,395
|
|||||||||
Net
(loss) income per common share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
(1.12
|
)
|
$
|
2.58
|
$
|
(2.66
|
)
|
$
|
4.77
|
|||
Diluted
|
$
|
(1.12
|
)
|
$
|
2.35
|
$
|
(2.66
|
)
|
$
|
4.34
|
|||
Cash
dividends per share
|
$
|
0.10
|
$
|
0.10
|
$
|
0.20
|
$
|
0.20
|
See
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
BEAZER
HOMES USA, INC.
UNAUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in
thousands)
Six
Months Ended
March
31,
|
|||||||
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$
|
(102,095
|
)
|
$
|
194,264
|
||
Adjustments
to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by
(used
in) operating activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
5,002
|
5,061
|
|||||
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
3,927
|
5,981
|
|||||
Inventory
impairments and option contract abandonments
|
199,777
|
12,531
|
|||||
Deferred
income tax (benefit) provision
|
(51,022
|
)
|
11,014
|
||||
Tax
benefit from stock transactions
|
(3,219
|
)
|
(6,893
|
)
|
|||
Equity
in loss (income) of unconsolidated joint ventures
|
10,052
|
(682
|
)
|
||||
Distributions
from earnings in unconsolidated joint ventures
|
2,326
|
—
|
|||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|||||||
Decrease
in accounts receivable
|
267,478
|
35,216
|
|||||
Increase
in inventory
|
(12,140
|
)
|
(481,675
|
)
|
|||
Decrease
(increase) in residential mortgage loans
available-for-sale
|
81,820
|
(27,775
|
)
|
||||
Increase
in other assets
|
(24,235
|
)
|
(22,437
|
)
|
|||
(Decrease)
increase in trade accounts payable
|
(53,837
|
)
|
9,056
|
||||
Decrease
in other liabilities
|
(141,875
|
)
|
(79,560
|
)
|
|||
Other
changes, net
|
1,354
|
217
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
183,313
|
(345,682
|
)
|
||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|||||||
Capital
expenditures, net
|
(1,988
|
)
|
(7,335
|
)
|
|||
Investments
in unconsolidated joint ventures
|
(16,906
|
)
|
(36,668
|
)
|
|||
Changes
in restricted cash
|
4,232
|
—
|
|||||
Distributions
from unconsolidated joint ventures
|
1,196
|
2,911
|
|||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(13,466
|
)
|
(41,092
|
)
|
|||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||||||
Borrowings
under credit facilities
|
91,258
|
699,469
|
|||||
Repayment
of credit facilities
|
(176,789
|
)
|
(534,812
|
)
|
|||
Repayment
of other notes payable
|
(6,445
|
)
|
(5,354
|
)
|
|||
Repurchase
of senior notes
|
(20,563
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Debt
issuance costs
|
(319
|
)
|
(871
|
)
|
|||
Treasury
stock purchases
|
—
|
(133,207
|
)
|
||||
Common
stock redeemed
|
(140
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Proceeds
from stock option exercises
|
4,009
|
6,574
|
|||||
Tax
benefit from stock transactions
|
3,219
|
6,893
|
|||||
Dividends
paid
|
(7,806
|
)
|
(8,250
|
)
|
|||
Net
change in book overdraft
|
—
|
74,417
|
|||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(113,576
|
)
|
104,859
|
||||
Increase
(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
56,271
|
(281,915
|
)
|
||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
162,570
|
297,098
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
218,841
|
$
|
15,183
|
|||
Supplemental
cash flow information:
|
|||||||
Interest
paid
|
$
|
69,085
|
$
|
53,818
|
|||
Income
taxes paid
|
$
|
14,690
|
$
|
108,900
|
|||
Supplemental
disclosures of non-cash activities:
|
|||||||
Increase
in consolidated inventory not owned
|
$
|
4,926
|
$
|
78,258
|
|||
Increase
in inventory financed through notes payable
|
$
|
35,513
|
$
|
32,595
|
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
BEAZER
HOMES USA, INC.
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
(1)
Basis of Presentation
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Beazer
Homes USA, Inc. (“Beazer Homes” or “the Company”) have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of
America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and in accordance with the
instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Such financial
statements do not include all of the information and disclosures required by
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for
complete financial statements. In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting
solely of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation have
been
included in the accompanying financial statements. Certain items in prior period
financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current
presentation. For further information, refer to our audited consolidated
financial statements appearing in the Beazer Homes’ Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 (the “2006 Annual
Report”).
The
Company’s Audit Committee is performing an independent internal review as
described in Part II, Item 1 of this report. As a result, the financial
information in this report has not been reviewed by the Company’s independent
registered public accounting firm as required by Section 10-01(d) of Regulation
S-X.
(2)
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
A
discussion of our significant accounting policies other than as discussed below
is included in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included
in
Beazer Homes’ Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in
the
2006 Annual Report.
Stock-Based
Compensation
In
the
first quarter of fiscal 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (“SFAS”) SFAS 123R, Share-Based
Payment.
SFAS
123R applies to new awards and to awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled
after October 1, 2005, as well as to the unvested portion of awards outstanding
as of October 1, 2005. We use the Black-Scholes model to value new stock-settled
appreciation rights (“SSARs”) and stock option grants under SFAS 123R and
applied the “modified prospective method” for existing grants which requires us
to value the grants made prior to our adoption of SFAS 123R under the fair
value
method and expense the unvested portion over the remaining vesting period.
SFAS
123R also requires us to estimate forfeitures in calculating the expense related
to stock-based compensation. In addition, SFAS 123R requires us to reflect
the
benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost as a
financing cash inflow and an operating cash outflow. Nonvested stock granted
to
employees is valued based on the market price of the common stock on the date
of
the grant. Performance based, nonvested stock granted to employees is valued
using the Monte Carlo valuation method.
Compensation
cost arising from nonvested stock granted to employees and from non-employee
stock awards is recognized as an expense using the straight-line method over
the
vesting period. Unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock is
included in paid-in capital in accordance with SFAS 123R. As of March 31, 2007,
there was $22.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
nonvested stock. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average
period of 3.9 years. For the three months and six months ended March 31, 2007,
our total stock-based compensation expense was approximately $200,000 ($62,000
net of tax) and $3.9 million ($2.7 million net of tax), respectively.
6
Stock
compensation expense for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 includes the reversal
of approximately $2.8 million of previously recorded stock compensation expense
as a result of unvested stock-based award forfeitures. The following table
summarizes nonvested stock awards as of March 31, 2007, as well as activity
for
the three and six months then ended.
Three
Months Ended
March
31, 2007
|
|
Six
Months Ended
March
31, 2007
|
|||||||||||
Shares
|
|
Weighted
Average Grant Date Fair Value |
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted
Average Grant Date Fair Value |
|||||||
Beginning
of period
|
1,054,738
|
$
|
50.15
|
974,457
|
$
|
50.66
|
|||||||
Granted
|
53,496
|
36.29
|
181,554
|
42.06
|
|||||||||
Vested
|
(4,500
|
)
|
44.35
|
(23,622
|
)
|
48.41
|
|||||||
Forfeited
|
(183,580
|
)
|
52.80
|
(212,235
|
)
|
51.42
|
|||||||
End
of period
|
920,154
|
$
|
48.85
|
920,154
|
$
|
48.85
|
In
addition, during the three months and six months ended March 31, 2007, employees
surrendered 1,261 and 3,224 shares, respectively, to the Company in payment
of
minimum tax obligations upon the vesting of nonvested stock under our stock
incentive plans. During the three and six months ended March 31, 2007, we valued
the stock at the market price on the date of surrender for an aggregate value
of
approximately $55,000
and $140,000, or approximately $43.51 and $43.33 per share,
respectively.
The
fair
value of each option or SSAR grant is estimated on the date of grant using
the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Expected life of options and SSARs granted
are generally computed using the mid-point between the vesting period and
contractual life of the awards granted. Expected volatilities are based on
the
historical volatility of the Beazer Homes’ stock and other factors. Expected
discrete dividends of $0.10 per quarter are assumed in lieu of a continuously
compounding dividend yield.
The
following table summarizes stock options and SSARs outstanding as of March
31,
2007 as well as activity during the three and six months then
ended:
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
March
31, 2007
|
March
31, 2007
|
||||||||||||
Shares
|
Weighted-
Average Exercise Price |
Shares
|
|
Weighted-
Average Exercise Price |
|||||||||
Outstanding
at beginning of period
|
1,817,309
|
$
|
48.71
|
2,135,572
|
$
|
43.82
|
|||||||
Granted
|
273,888
|
43.07
|
273,888
|
43.07
|
|||||||||
Exercised
|
(17,394
|
)
|
32.96
|
(297,501
|
)
|
13.47
|
|||||||
Forfeited
|
(196,004
|
)
|
64.47
|
(234,160
|
)
|
60.95
|
|||||||
Outstanding
at end of period
|
1,877,799
|
$
|
46.39
|
1,877,799
|
$
|
46.39
|
|||||||
Exercisable
at end of period
|
637,608
|
$
|
26.24
|
637,608
|
$
|
26.24
|
7
At
March
31, 2007, the weighted-average remaining contractual life for all options and
SSARs outstanding and currently exercisable was 5.05 years and 4.72 years,
respectively. At March 31, 2007, the aggregate intrinsic value of both stock
options outstanding and stock options exercisable was $2.7 million. (The
intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the market value of
the
underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the stock option.) The intrinsic
value of stock options exercised during the three and six months ended March
31,
2007 was approximately $14,300 and $8.6 million.
Goodwill
Goodwill
represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of assets
acquired. We test goodwill for impairment annually as of April 30 or more
frequently if an event occurs or circumstances indicate that the asset might
be
impaired. As a result of inventory impairments discussed in Note 3, we analyzed
the estimated fair value of certain of our reporting units with goodwill as
of
March 31, 2007. Based on our analysis, we determined that goodwill for these
reporting units was not impaired as of March 31, 2007. We will perform our
annual goodwill impairment test for all reporting units as of April 30, 2007.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
July
2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - An Interpretation of FASB Statement No.
109
(“FIN
48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized
in the financial statements in accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting
for Income Taxes.
FIN 48
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial
statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to
be
taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure, and transition. FIN 48 is effective beginning in our fiscal year
2008. We are currently evaluating the impact adopting FIN 48 will have on our
consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
On
November 29, 2006, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 06-8, Applicability
of the Assessment of a Buyer’s Continuing Investment under FASB Statement No.
66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate, for Sales of
Condominiums.
EITF
06-8 states that the adequacy of the buyer’s continuing investment under SFAS 66
should be assessed in determining whether to recognize profit under the
percentage-of-completion method on the sale of individual units in a condominium
project. This consensus requires that additional deposits be collected by
developers of condominium projects that wish to recognize profit during the
construction period under the percentage-of-completion method. EITF 06-8 is
effective for fiscal years beginning in our fiscal year 2008. We are currently
evaluating the impact adopting EITF 06-8 will have on our consolidated financial
condition and results of operations.
(3)
Inventory
March
31,
|
September
30,
|
||||||
(in
thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||
Homes
under construction
|
$
|
1,186,280
|
$
|
1,368,056
|
|||
Development
projects in progress
|
1,647,947
|
1,623,819
|
|||||
Unimproved
land held for future development
|
12,095
|
12,213
|
|||||
Model
homes
|
62,963
|
44,803
|
|||||
Consolidated
inventory not owned
|
462,296
|
471,441
|
|||||
$
|
3,371,581
|
$
|
3,520,332
|
Homes
under construction includes homes finished and ready for delivery and homes
in
various stages of construction. We
had
717 ($168.3 million) and 1,197 ($257.9 million) completed homes that were not
subject to a sales contract, not including model homes, at March 31, 2007 and
September 30, 2006, respectively.
8
Development
projects in progress consist principally of land and land improvement costs.
Certain of the fully developed lots in this category are reserved by a deposit
or sales contract.
Consistent
with our accounting policy described in our 2006 Annual Report, housing
projects, development projects in progress and unimproved land held for future
development (components of inventory) were reviewed this quarter for
recoverability as a result of continuing difficult market conditions in the
homebuilding industry. Most markets across the country continue to experience
lower levels of demand, significant competition and discounting coupled with
higher levels of inventory. In response to these market conditions, we
discounted prices and/or offered other incentives to buyers in certain
communities with an objective to reduce inventory and generate cash flow. Based
on these events and our analysis we determined that the carrying amount of
certain of our inventory assets exceeded its estimated fair value. We estimated
fair value using a discounted cash flow methodology. As a result, during the
three and six months ended March 31, 2007, we incurred $60.8 million and $155.5
million, respectively, of non-cash pretax charges related to inventory
impairments.
We
acquire certain lots by means of option contracts. Option contracts generally
require the payment of cash for the right to acquire lots during a specified
period of time at a certain price. Under option contracts, both with and without
specific performance provisions, purchase of the properties is contingent upon
satisfaction of certain requirements by us and the sellers. Our obligation
with
respect to options with specific performance provisions is included on the
Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets in other payables and
accrued liabilities. Under option contracts without specific performance
obligations, our liability is generally limited to forfeiture of the
non-refundable deposits, letters of credit and other non-refundable
pre-acquisition development costs incurred, which aggregated approximately
$302.5 million at March 31, 2007. This amount includes letters of credit of
approximately $42.4 million. Total remaining purchase price, net of cash
deposits, committed under all options was $2.1 billion at March 31, 2007. $16.2
million of total remaining purchase price under such options contain specific
performance clauses which may require us to purchase the land or lots upon
the
land seller meeting certain obligations. We incurred non-cash pretax charges
related to the abandonment of lot option agreements and write-off of option
deposits and other pre-acquisition costs of $19.1 million and $44.2 million
for
the three months ended March 31, 2007 and charges of $8.8 million and $11.7
million for the three and six months ended March 31, 2006,
respectively.
Certain
of our option contracts are with sellers who are deemed to be Variable Interest
Entities (“VIE”s) under FASB Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51
(“FIN
46R”). FIN 46R defines a VIE as an entity with insufficient equity investment to
finance its planned activities without additional financial support or an entity
in which the equity investors lack certain characteristics of a controlling
financial interest. Pursuant to FIN 46R, an enterprise that absorbs a majority
of the expected losses or receives a majority of the expected residual returns
of a VIE is deemed to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE and must consolidate
the VIE.
We
have
determined that we are the primary beneficiary of certain of these option
contracts. Our risk is generally limited to the option deposits that we pay,
and
creditors of the sellers generally have no recourse to the general credit of
the
Company. Although we do not have legal title to the optioned land, for those
option contracts for which we are the primary beneficiary, we are required
to
consolidate the land under option at fair value. We believe that the exercise
prices of our option contracts approximate their fair value. Our unaudited
condensed consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006
reflect consolidated inventory not owned of $462.3 million and $471.4 million,
respectively. We consolidated $143.8 million and $146.6 million of lot option
agreements as consolidated inventory not owned pursuant to FIN 46R as of March
31, 2007 and September 30, 2006, respectively. In addition, as of March 31,
2007
and September 30, 2006, we recorded $318.5 million and $324.8 million,
respectively, of land under the caption consolidated inventory not owned related
to lot option agreements for which our deposits and pre-acquisition development
costs exceeded certain thresholds. Obligations related to consolidated inventory
not owned totaled $335.6 million at March 31, 2007 and $330.7 million at
September 30, 2006. The difference between the balances of consolidated
inventory not owned and obligations related to consolidated inventory not owned
represents cash deposits paid and other pre-acquisition costs incurred under
the
option agreements.
9
(4)
Investments in and Advances to Unconsolidated Joint
Ventures
We
participate in a number of land development joint ventures in which Beazer
Homes
has less than a controlling interest. Our joint ventures are typically entered
into with developers, other homebuilders and financial partners to develop
finished lots for sale to the joint venture’s members and other third parties.
We account for our interest in these joint ventures under the equity method.
We
recognize our share of profits from the sale of lots to other buyers. Our share
of profits from lots purchased from the joint ventures are deferred and treated
as a reduction of the cost of the land purchased from the joint venture. Such
profits are subsequently recognized at the time the home closes and title passes
to the homebuyer. During the quarter ended March 31, 2007, we wrote down our
investment in two of our Virginia joint ventures reflecting impairments of
inventory held within those ventures. The related impairment charge of $7.1
million is recorded in equity in loss of unconsolidated joint ventures in the
accompanying Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended March
31, 2007.
Our
joint
ventures typically obtain secured acquisition and development financing. At
March 31, 2007, our unconsolidated joint ventures have borrowings outstanding
totaling $788.8 million. In some instances, Beazer Homes and our joint venture
partners have provided varying levels of guarantees of debt of our
unconsolidated joint ventures. At March 31, 2007, we had repayment guarantees
of
$13.0 million and limited maintenance guarantees of $6.3 million related to
certain of our unconsolidated joint ventures’ debt. The repayment guarantee
requires the repayment of a portion of the debt of the unconsolidated joint
venture in the event the joint venture defaults on its obligations under the
borrowings. The limited maintenance guarantees only apply if an unconsolidated
joint venture defaults on its loan arrangements and the value of the collateral
(generally land and improvements) is less than a specified percentage of the
loan balance. We have not recorded a liability for the non-contingent aspect
of
these guarantees as such amounts are not material. In assessing the need to
record a liability for the contingent aspect of these guarantees, we consider
our historical experience in being required to perform under the guarantees,
the
fair value of the collateral underlying these guarantees and the financial
condition of the applicable unconsolidated joint ventures. In addition, we
monitor the fair value of the collateral of these unconsolidated joint ventures
to ensure that the related borrowings do not exceed the specified percentage
of
the value of the property securing the borrowings. To date, we have not incurred
any obligations related to repayment or limited maintenance guarantees. Based
on
these considerations, we have determined that it is remote that we will have
to
perform under the contingent aspects of these guarantees and, as a result,
have
not recorded a liability for the contingent aspects of these guarantees. To
the
extent the recording of a liability related to such guarantees would be
required; the recognition of such liability would result in an increase to
the
carrying value of our investment in the associated joint venture.
10
(5)
Interest
The
following table sets forth certain information regarding interest (in
thousands):
Three
Months Ended
March
31,
|
Six
Months Ended
March
31,
|
||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Capitalized
interest in inventory, beginning of period
|
$
|
90,322
|
$
|
58,769
|
$
|
76,134
|
$
|
51,411
|
|||||
Interest
incurred and capitalized
|
35,091
|
27,903
|
69,394
|
53,436
|
|||||||||
Capitalized
interest amortized to cost of sales
|
(29,427
|
)
|
(20,542
|
)
|
(49,542
|
)
|
(38,717
|
)
|
|||||
Capitalized
interest in inventory, end of period
|
95,986
|
$
|
66,130
|
$
|
95,986
|
$
|
66,130
|
(6)
Earnings Per Share and Stockholders’ Equity
Basic
and
diluted earnings per share were calculated as follows (in thousands, except
per
share amounts):
Three
Months Ended
March
31,
|
Six
Months Ended
March
31,
|
||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Basic:
|
|||||||||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$
|
(43,089
|
)
|
$
|
104,351
|
$
|
(102,095
|
)
|
$
|
194,264
|
|||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding
|
38,427
|
40,442
|
38,353
|
40,703
|
|||||||||
Basic
(loss) earnings per share
|
$
|
(1.12
|
)
|
$
|
2.58
|
$
|
(2.66
|
)
|
$
|
4.77
|
|||
Diluted:
|
|||||||||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$
|
(43,089
|
)
|
$
|
104,351
|
$
|
(102,095
|
)
|
$
|
194,264
|
|||
Interest
on convertible debt - net of taxes
|
—
|
1,347
|
—
|
2,691
|
|||||||||
Net
(loss) income available to common shareholders
|
$
|
(43,089
|
)
|
$
|
105,698
|
$
|
(102,095
|
)
|
$
|
196,955
|
|||
Weighted
average number of common shares
outstanding
|
38,427
|
40,442
|
38,353
|
40,703
|
|||||||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
|||||||||||||
Shares
issuable upon conversion of convertible debt
|
—
|
3,499
|
—
|
3,499
|
|||||||||
Options
to acquire common stock
|
—
|
439
|
—
|
573
|
|||||||||
Contingent
shares (performance based stock)
|
—
|
70
|
—
|
35
|
|||||||||
Nonvested
restricted stock
|
—
|
616
|
—
|
585
|
|||||||||
Diluted
weighted average common shares
outstanding
|
38,427
|
45,066
|
38,353
|
45,395
|
|||||||||
Diluted
(loss) earnings per share
|
$
|
(1.12
|
)
|
$
|
2.35
|
$
|
(2.66
|
)
|
$
|
4.34
|
Emerging
Task Force Issue No. 04-8: The
Effect of Contingently Convertible Debt on Diluted Earnings Per
Share
(“EITF
04-8”) requires that shares issuable upon conversion of contingently convertible
debt instruments (“Co-Cos”) be included in diluted earnings per share
computations using the “if-converted method” regardless of whether the issuer’s
stock price exceeds the contingent conversion price. EITF 04-8 applies to our
4
⅝% Convertible Senior Notes issued in June 2004. In computing diluted loss per
share for the three and six months ended March 31, 2007, common stock
equivalents were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share as
a
result of their anti-dilutive effect. Options to purchase 230,653 shares of
common stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share
for the six months ended March 31, 2006 because their inclusion would have
been
antidilutive.
11
In
June
2006, the Shareholder Rights Plan adopted in June 1996 by our Board of Directors
expired. No rights issued under this plan were redeemed or exercised prior
to
expiration.
(7)
Borrowings
At
March
31, 2007 and September 30, 2006 we had the following borrowings (in thousands):
|
|
Maturity
Date
|
|
March
31, 2007 |
|
September
30, 2006 |
||||
Mortgage
Warehouse Line
|
February
2008
|
$
|
9,350
|
$
|
94,881
|
|||||
Revolving
Credit Facility
|
August
2009
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||
8
5/8% Senior Notes*
|
May
2011
|
190,000
|
200,000
|
|||||||
8
3/8% Senior Notes*
|
April
2012
|
340,000
|
350,000
|
|||||||
6
1/2% Senior Notes*
|
November
2013
|
200,000
|
200,000
|
|||||||
6
7/8% Senior Notes*
|
July
2015
|
350,000
|
350,000
|
|||||||
8
1/8% Senior Notes*
|
June
2016
|
275,000
|
275,000
|
|||||||
4
5/8% Convertible Senior Notes*
|
June
2024
|
180,000
|
180,000
|
|||||||
Junior
Subordinated Notes
|
July
2036
|
103,093
|
103,093
|
|||||||
Other
Notes Payable
|
Various
Dates
|
118,332
|
89,264
|
|||||||
Unamortized
debt discounts
|
(3,302
|
)
|
(3,578
|
)
|
||||||
Total
|
$
|
1,762,473
|
$
|
1,838,660
|
*
|
Collectively,
the “Senior
Notes”
|
Mortgage
Warehouse Line -
On
January 11, 2006, Beazer Mortgage Corporation (“Beazer Mortgage”), our
wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into a 364-day credit agreement with a number
of banks to fund the origination of residential mortgage loans (the “Warehouse
Line”). Beazer Mortgage amended (the “Second Amendment”) the Warehouse Line to
extend the maturity date to February 6, 2008 and to modify the maximum available
borrowing capacity to $100 million (expandable to $200 million), subject to
compliance with the mortgage loan eligibility requirements as provided in the
Second Amendment. The Warehouse Line is secured by certain mortgage loans held
for sale and related property and is not guaranteed by Beazer Homes or any
of
its subsidiaries that are guarantors of the Senior Notes or the Revolving Credit
Facility. Beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2006, Beazer Mortgage
finances a portion of its mortgage lending activities with borrowings under
the
Warehouse Line. Borrowings under the Warehouse Line were $9.4 million and bore
interest at 6.3% per annum as of March 31, 2007. Beazer Mortgage had a pipeline
of loans in process of approximately $675 million as of March 31, 2007 which
may
be financed either through the Warehouse Line or with third party investors.
The
Warehouse Line contains various operating and financial covenants. The Company
was in compliance with such covenants at March 31, 2007.
Revolving
Credit Facility - In
August
2005, we entered into a new four-year unsecured revolving credit facility (the
“Revolving Credit Facility”) with a group of banks which was expanded in June
2006 to $1 billion and which matures in August 2009. The Revolving Credit
Facility includes a $50 million swing line commitment. We have the option to
elect two types of loans under the Revolving Credit Facility which incur
interest as applicable based on either the Alternative Base Rate or the
Applicable Eurodollar Margin (both defined in the Revolving Credit Facility).
The Revolving Credit Facility contains various operating and financial
covenants. We were in compliance with such covenants at March 31, 2007.
Substantially all of our significant subsidiaries are guarantors of the
obligations under the Revolving Credit Facility (see Note 11).
12
We
fulfill our short-term cash requirements with cash generated from our operations
and funds available from our Revolving Credit Facility. Available
borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility are limited to certain
percentages of homes under contract, unsold homes, substantially improved lots,
lots under development, raw land and accounts receivable. At March 31, 2007,
we
had available borrowings of $232.7 million under the Revolving Credit Facility.
There were no borrowings outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility at
March 31, 2007 or September 30, 2006.
Senior
Notes
- The
Senior Notes are unsecured obligations ranking pari passu with all other
existing and future senior indebtedness. Substantially all of our significant
subsidiaries are full and unconditional guarantors of the Senior Notes and
are
jointly and severally liable for obligations under the Senior Notes and the
Revolving Credit Facility. Each guarantor subsidiary is a 100% owned subsidiary
of Beazer Homes.
The
indentures under which the Senior Notes were issued contain certain restrictive
covenants, including limitations on payment of dividends. At March 31, 2007,
under the most restrictive covenants of each indenture, approximately
$189.8 million of our retained earnings was available for cash dividends and
for
share repurchases. Each indenture provides that, in the event of defined changes
in control or if our consolidated tangible net worth falls below a specified
level or in certain circumstances upon a sale of assets, we are required to
offer to repurchase certain specified amounts of outstanding Senior
Notes.
In
March
2007, we voluntarily repurchased $10.0 million of our outstanding 8 5/8% and
$10.0 million of our outstanding 8 3/8% Senior Notes on the open market. The
aggregate purchase price was $20.6 million, or an average of 102.8% of the
aggregate principal amount of the notes repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid
interest as of the purchase date. The repurchase of the notes resulted in a
$562,500 pretax loss included in other (loss) income in the accompanying
Statement of Operations. On March 28, 2007, we repurchased an additional $10.0
million of our outstanding 8 5/8% Senior Notes which were cash settled on April
2, 2007 at a purchase price of $9.85 million. Senior Notes purchased by the
Company were cancelled on the books of the Senior Notes’ trustee.
Junior
Subordinated Notes - On
June
15, 2006, we completed a private placement of $103.1 million of unsecured junior
subordinated notes which mature on July 30, 2036 and are redeemable at par
on or
after July 30, 2011 and pay a fixed rate of 7.987% for the first ten years
ending July 30, 2016. Thereafter, the securities have a floating interest rate
equal to three-month LIBOR plus 2.45% per annum, resetting quarterly. These
notes were issued to Beazer Capital Trust I, which simultaneously issued, in
a
private transaction, trust preferred securities and common securities with
an
aggregate value of $103.1 million to fund its purchase of these notes. The
transaction is treated as debt in accordance with GAAP. The obligations relating
to these notes and the related securities are subordinated to the Revolving
Credit Facility and the Senior Notes.
Other
Notes -
We
periodically acquire land through the issuance of notes payable. As of March
31,
2007 and September 30, 2006, we had outstanding notes payable of $118.3 million
and $89.3 million, respectively, primarily related to land acquisitions and
land
development. These notes payable expire at various times through 2010 and had
fixed and variable rates ranging from 6.75% to 11.00% at March 31, 2007. These
notes are secured by the real estate to which they relate.
13
(8)
Contingencies
United
States Attorney Inquiry and Outstanding Litigation-
As
previously disclosed in our Form 8-K dated March 27, 2007, Beazer Homes received
a subpoena from the United States Attorney’s office in the Western District of
North Carolina, seeking the production of documents focusing on our mortgage
origination services and, together with certain of our subsidiaries and current
and former officers, has been named as a defendant in a putative securities
class action lawsuit and a putative homeowner class action lawsuit. The
Company has also recently learned that a second putative homeowner class action
lawsuit has been filed in South Carolina and that it was named as a nominal
defendant in a shareholder derivative complaint filed on April 16, 2007 against
certain of our current and former executive officers and directors claiming
violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule
10b-5 and breaches of fiduciary duty based on matters related to the Company’s
mortgage origination business. We are cooperating with the United States
Attorney and the document production request and intend to vigorously defend
each of the lawsuits. The Audit Committee of the Beazer Homes Board of
Directors has initiated an independent internal review of Beazer Homes’ mortgage
origination business and related matters and has retained independent legal
counsel and an independent financial consultant to assist with that review.
The
U.S. Attorney inquiry and the related internal review by the Audit Committee
and
the outstanding lawsuits are in their early stages. At this time, we
cannot predict the outcome of these matters or the length of time it will take
to resolve them. For more detailed information see Part II, Item 1. Legal
Proceedings of this Form 10-Q.
Trinity
Claims
- Beazer
Homes and certain of our subsidiaries have been and continue to be named as
defendants in various construction defect claims, complaints and other legal
actions that include claims related to moisture intrusion and mold. We have
experienced a significant number of such claims in our Midwest region and
particularly with respect to homes built by Trinity Homes LLC, a subsidiary
which was acquired in the Crossmann acquisition in 2002.
As
of
March 31, 2007, there were six pending
lawsuits related to such complaints received by Trinity. All suits are by
individual homeowners, and the cost to resolve these matters is not expected
to
be material, either individually or in the aggregate. Additionally, a class
action suit was filed in the State of Indiana in August 2003 against Trinity
Homes LLC. The parties in the class action reached a settlement agreement which
was approved by the court on October 20, 2004. The settlement class includes,
with certain exclusions, the current owners of all Trinity homes that have
brick
veneer, where the closing of Trinity’s initial sale of the home took place
between June 1, 1998 and October 31, 2002. The settlement agreement establishes
an agreed protocol and process for assessment and remediation of any external
water intrusion issues at the homes which includes, among other things, that
the
homes will be repaired at Trinity’s expense. The settlement agreement also
provides for payment of plaintiffs’ attorneys’ fees and for Trinity to pay an
agreed amount for engineering inspection costs for each home for which a claim
is filed under the settlement.
Under
the
settlement, subject to Trinity’s timely performance of the specified assessments
and remediation activities for homeowners who file claims, each homeowner
releases Trinity, Beazer Homes Investment Corp. and other affiliated companies,
including Beazer Homes, from the claims asserted in the class action lawsuit,
claims arising out of external water intrusion, claims of improper brick
installation, including property damage claims, loss or diminution of property
value claims, and most personal injury claims, among others. No appeals of
the
court’s order approving the settlement were received by the court within the
timeframe established by the court. The Company sent out the claims
notices on December 17, 2004, and the class members had until February 15,
2005
to file claims. A total of 1,310 valid claims were filed (of the 2,161 total
class members), of which 613 complaints had been received prior to our receipt
of the claim notices. Class members who did not file a claim by February 15,
2005 are no longer able to file a class action claim under the settlement or
pursue an individual claim against Trinity. As of March 31, 2007, we have
completed remediation of 1,226 homes related to 1,803 total Trinity
claims.
14
Our
warranty reserves at March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006 include accruals
for
our estimated costs to assess and remediate all homes for which Trinity had
received complaints related to moisture intrusion and mold, including a
provision for legal fees. Warranty reserves also include accruals for class
action claims received, pursuant to the settlement discussed above, from class
members who had not previously contacted Trinity with complaints.
The
cost
to assess and remediate a home depends on the extent of moisture damage, if
any,
that the home has incurred. Homes for which we receive complaints are classified
into one of three categories: 1) homes with no moisture damage, 2) homes with
isolated moisture damage or 3) homes with extensive moisture damage.
As
of
March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006, we accrued for our estimated cost to
remediate homes that we had assessed and assigned to one of the above
categories, as well as our estimated cost to remediate those homes for which
an
assessment had not yet been performed. For purposes of our accrual, we have
historically assigned homes not yet assessed to categories based on our
expectations about the extent of damage and trends observed from the results
of
assessments performed to date. In addition, our cost estimation process
considers the subdivision of the claimant along with the categorization
discussed above. Once a home is categorized, detailed budgets are used as the
basis to prepare our estimated costs to remediate such home.
During
fiscal 2004, we initiated a program under which we offered to repurchase a
limited number of homes from specific homeowners. The program was concluded
during the first quarter of fiscal 2005. We repurchased a total of 54 homes
under the program. During the six months ended March 31, 2007, the Company
sold
five of the repurchased homes, bringing the total homes sold to date to 27.
The
remaining 27 homes were acquired for an aggregate purchase price of $11.6
million. The accrual at March 31, 2007 includes the estimated costs to sell
homes that we have repurchased, and our estimated losses on the sale of those
homes, if any.
The
following accruals at March 31 represent our best estimates of the costs to
resolve all asserted complaints associated with Trinity moisture intrusion
and
related mold issues. We regularly review our estimate of these costs. During
the
quarter ended March 31, 2007, we adjusted our estimate of these costs and the
related accruals based on historical experience in resolving such complaints
and
reduced our accrual by $6.0 million. Since the commencement of the remediation
program, our remediation cost per home has continued to decrease as homes
requiring more extensive repairs were addressed first and our internal processes
and procedures, including enhanced contractor bid negotiations and inspections,
improved as experience gained in addressing these issues has yielded meaningful
benefits on a per home basis. Changes in the accrual for Trinity moisture
intrusion and related mold issues during the period were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|||||||||
March
31,
|
March
31,
|
||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Balance
at beginning of period
|
$
|
45,711
|
$
|
78,056
|
$
|
47,704
|
$
|
80,708
|
|||||
Reductions
|
(6,000
|
)
|
(6,500
|
)
|
(6,000
|
)
|
(6,500
|
)
|
|||||
Payments
|
(2,736
|
)
|
(2,075
|
)
|
(4,729
|
)
|
(4,727
|
)
|
|||||
Balance
at end of period
|
$
|
36,975
|
$
|
69,481
|
$
|
36,975
|
$
|
69,481
|
15
Actual
costs to assess and remediate homes in each category and subdivision, the extent
of damage to homes not yet assessed, estimates of costs to sell the remaining
repurchased homes, and losses on such sales could differ from our
estimates. As a result, the costs to resolve existing complaints could differ
from our recorded accruals and have a material adverse effect on our earnings
in
the periods in which the matters are resolved. Additionally, it is possible
that
we will incur additional losses related to these matters, including additional
losses related to homes for which we have not yet received complaints.
Warranty
Reserves
- We
currently provide a limited warranty (ranging from one to two years) covering
workmanship and materials per our defined performance quality standards. In
addition, we provide a limited warranty (generally ranging from a minimum of
five years up to the period covered by the applicable statute of repose)
covering only certain defined construction defects. We also provide a defined
structural element warranty with single-family homes and townhomes in certain
states.
Since
Beazer Homes subcontracts its homebuilding work to subcontractors who generally
provide us with an indemnity and a certificate of insurance prior to receiving
payments for their work, many claims relating to workmanship and materials
are
the primary responsibility of the subcontractors.
As
noted
above, our
warranty reserves at March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006 include accruals
for
Trinity moisture intrusion and related mold issues. Warranty reserves are
included in other payables and accrued liabilities in the unaudited condensed
consolidated balance sheets. We record reserves covering anticipated warranty
expense for each home closed. Management reviews the adequacy of warranty
reserves each reporting period based on historical experience and management’s
estimate of the costs to remediate the claims and adjusts these provisions
accordingly. While we believe that our warranty reserves are adequate,
historical data and trends may not accurately predict actual warranty costs,
or
future developments could lead to a significant change in the reserve.
Changes
in our warranty reserves, which include amounts related to the Trinity moisture
intrusion and mold issues discussed above, during the period are as follows
(in
thousands):
Three
Months Ended
March
31,
|
|
Six
Months Ended March
31, |
|||||||||||
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|||||||
Balance
at beginning of period
|
$
|
95,843
|
$
|
131,805
|
$
|
101,033
|
$
|
138,033
|
|||||
Provisions
|
4,461
|
5,724
|
10,658
|
11,582
|
|||||||||
Payments
|
(10,834
|
)
|
(12,537
|
)
|
(22,221
|
)
|
(24,623
|
)
|
|||||
Balance
at end of period
|
$
|
89,470
|
$
|
124,992
|
$
|
89,470
|
$
|
124,992
|
16
Other
Contingencies
-
We and
certain of our subsidiaries have been named as defendants in various claims,
complaints and other legal actions, including matters relating to moisture
intrusion and related mold claims, construction defects and product liability.
Certain of the liabilities resulting from these actions are covered in whole
or
part by insurance. With respect to certain general liability exposures,
including construction defect, moisture intrusion and related mold claims and
product liability claims, interpretation of underlying current and future
trends, assessment of claims and the related liability and reserve estimation
process is highly judgmental due to the complex nature of these exposures,
with
each exposure exhibiting unique circumstances. In particular, for construction
defect liability there is some degree of uncertainty related to the
recoverability of insurance proceeds, when losses occur, the size of each loss,
expectations for future interpretive rulings concerning contract provisions,
possible recovery against other responsible parties, and the extent to which
the
assertion of these claims will expand geographically. In our opinion, based
on
our current assessment, the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have
a
material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations,
or
cash flows.
We
had
performance bonds and outstanding letters of credit of approximately
$836.0
million and $95.3 million, respectively, at March 31, 2007 related principally
to our obligations to local governments to construct roads and other
improvements in various developments in addition to the letters of credit of
approximately $58.6 million relating to our land option contracts discussed
in
Note 3. We do not believe that any such letters of credit or bonds are likely
to
be drawn upon.
(9)
Stock Repurchase Program
On
November 18, 2005, as part of an acceleration of Beazer Homes’ comprehensive
plan to enhance stockholder value, our Board of Directors authorized an increase
in our stock repurchase plan to ten million shares of our common stock. Shares
may be purchased for cash in the open market, on the NYSE or in privately
negotiated transactions. We did not repurchase any shares in the open market
during the six months ended March 31, 2007. During the six months ended March
31, 2006, we repurchased approximately 2.0 million shares for an aggregate
purchase price of $133.2 million or approximately $66 per share pursuant to
the
plan. At March 31, 2007, we are authorized to purchase approximately 5.4 million
additional shares pursuant to the plan.
(10)
Segment Information
As
defined in SFAS 131, “Disclosures
About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”,
we
have 32 homebuilding operating segments operating in 21 states and one financial
services segment. Revenues in our homebuilding segments are derived from the
sale of homes which we construct and from land and lot sales. Revenues in our
financial services segment are derived primarily from mortgage originations
provided predominantly to customers of our homebuilding operations. We
have
aggregated our homebuilding segments into four reportable segments, described
below, for our homebuilding operations and one reportable segment for our
financial services operations. The segments reported have been determined to
have similar economic characteristics including similar historical and expected
future operating performance, employment trends, land acquisition and land
constraints, and municipality behavior and meet the other aggregation criteria
in SFAS 131. The reportable homebuilding segments, and all other homebuilding
operations not required to be reported separately, include operations conducting
business in the following states:
West:
Arizona, California, Nevada and New Mexico
Mid-Atlantic:
Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia and West
Virginia
17
Florida
Southeast:
Georgia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Nashville, Tennessee
Other
Homebuilding: Colorado, Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, Texas and Memphis,
Tennessee
Management’s
evaluation of segment performance is based on segment operating income, which
for our homebuilding segments is defined as homebuilding and land sale revenues
less the cost of home construction, impairments, if any, land development and
land sales and certain selling, general and administrative expenses which are
incurred by or allocated to our homebuilding segments. Segment operating income
for our Financial Services segment is defined as revenues less costs associated
with our mortgage operations and certain selling, general and administrative
expenses incurred by or allocated to the Financial Services segment. The
accounting policies of our segments are those described in the notes to the
consolidated financial statements in our 2006 Annual Report. The following
information is in thousands:
|
|
Three
Months Ended March
31, |
|
Six
Months Ended March
31, |
|
||||||||
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
||||
Revenue
|
|||||||||||||
West
|
$
|
266,722
|
$
|
471,854
|
$
|
564,629
|
$
|
840,446
|
|||||
Mid-Atlantic
|
102,366
|
233,108
|
194,594
|
432,614
|
|||||||||
Florida
|
106,409
|
167,769
|
197,654
|
313,350
|
|||||||||
Southeast
|
183,626
|
188,969
|
338,755
|
365,902
|
|||||||||
Other
homebuilding
|
159,556
|
198,755
|
317,710
|
406,525
|
|||||||||
Financial
Services
|
11,226
|
13,135
|
22,969
|
24,113
|
|||||||||
Intercompany
elimination
|
(3,610
|
)
|
(4,499
|
)
|
(7,002
|
)
|
(8,243
|
)
|
|||||
Consolidated
total
|
$
|
826,295
|
$
|
1,269,091
|
$
|
1,629,309
|
$
|
2,374,707
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended March
31, |
|
Six
Months Ended March
31, |
|
||||||||
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||
Operating
(loss) income (a)
|
|||||||||||||
West
|
$
|
(20,607
|
)
|
$
|
87,242
|
$
|
(47,111
|
)
|
$
|
150,981
|
|||
Mid-Atlantic
|
(17,221
|
)
|
53,115
|
(20,472
|
)
|
102,616
|
|||||||
Florida
|
6,773
|
38,256
|
(21,720
|
)
|
68,887
|
||||||||
Southeast
|
14,705
|
10,573
|
23,139
|
26,676
|
|||||||||
Other
homebuilding
|
(16,846
|
)
|
(7,131
|
)
|
(32,554
|
)
|
(6,411
|
)
|
|||||
Financial
Services
|
2,046
|
2,947
|
5,276
|
3,242
|
|||||||||
Segment
operating (loss) income
|
(31,150
|
)
|
185,002
|
(93,442
|
)
|
345,991
|
|||||||
Corporate
and unallocated (b)
|
(33,167
|
)
|
(20,300
|
)
|
(65,134
|
)
|
(41,537
|
)
|
|||||
Total
operating (loss) income
|
(64,317
|
)
|
164,702
|
(158,576
|
)
|
304,454
|
|||||||
Equity
in (loss) income of unconsolidated joint ventures
(e)
|
(7,692
|
)
|
330
|
(10,052
|
)
|
682
|
|||||||
Other
income, net
|
2,694
|
1,582
|
4,687
|
5,685
|
|||||||||
(Loss)
income before income taxes
|
$
|
(69,315
|
)
|
$
|
166,614
|
$
|
(163,941
|
)
|
$
|
310,821
|
18
|
|
March
31, 2007 |
|
September
30, 2006 |
|
||
Assets
(c)
|
|||||||
West
|
$
|
1,188,983
|
$
|
1,392,660
|
|||
Mid-Atlantic
|
575,327
|
562,332
|
|||||
Florida
|
345,919
|
418,915
|
|||||
Southeast
|
412,938
|
433,922
|
|||||
Other
homebuilding
|
542,135
|
632,437
|
|||||
Financial
Services
|
105,702
|
205,684
|
|||||
Corporate
and unallocated (d)
|
1,020,020
|
913,481
|
|||||
Consolidated
total
|
$
|
4,191,024
|
$
|
4,559,431
|
(a) |
Operating
(loss) income for the three and
six months ended March 31, 2007 includes $19.1 million and $44.2
million,
respectively, of charges related to the abandonment of lot option
agreements and $60.8 million and $155.5 million, respectively,
of
inventory impairments which have been recorded in the segments
to which
the inventory relates (see Note 3). Total charges for inventory
impairments and option contract abandonments by segment during
the three
and six months ended March 31, 2007 were as follows: $30.1 million
and
$82.6 million, respectively, in the West, $24.7 million and $31.7
million,
respectively, in the Mid-Atlantic, $8.0 million and $50.3 million,
respectively, in Florida, $2.9 million and $5.8 million, respectively,
in
the Southeast and $14.6 million and $28.5 million, respectively,
in other
homebuilding.
|
(b) |
Corporate
and unallocated includes amortization of capitalized interest
and numerous
shared services functions that benefit all segments, the costs
of which
are not allocated to the operating segments reported above including
information technology, national sourcing and purchasing, treasury,
corporate finance, legal, branding and other national marketing
costs. The
three and six months ended March 31 include reductions in the
accrual and
costs related to the Trinity class action litigation settlement
of $6.0
million for 2007 and $6.5 million for 2006.
|
(c) |
Segment
assets as of both March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006 include
goodwill
assigned from prior acquisitions as follows: $55.5 million in
the West,
$23.3 million in the Mid-Atlantic, $13.7 million in Florida,
$17.6 million
in the Southeast and $11.2 million in other homebuilding. There
was no
change in goodwill from September 30, 2006 to March 31, 2007.
|
(d) |
Primarily
consists of cash and cash equivalents, consolidated inventory
not owned,
deferred taxes, and capitalized interest and other corporate
items that
are not allocated to the segments.
|
(e) |
Equity
in (loss) income of unconsolidated joint ventures includes $7.1
million of
investment impairment reflecting impairments of inventory held
within two
of our Virginia ventures.
|
(11)
Supplemental Guarantor Information
As
discussed in Note 7, our obligation to pay principal, premium, if any, and
interest under certain debt are guaranteed on a joint and several basis by
substantially all of our subsidiaries. The guarantees are full and unconditional
and the guarantor subsidiaries are 100% owned by Beazer Homes. We have
determined that separate, full financial statements of the guarantors would
not
be material to investors and, accordingly, supplemental financial information
for the guarantors is presented.
19
Beazer
Homes USA, Inc.
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet Information
March
31, 2007
(in
thousands)
Beazer
Homes
USA, Inc. |
Guarantor
Subsidiaries |
Beazer
Mortgage
Corp
|
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
|
Consolidating
Adjustments
|
Consolidated
Beazer
Homes
USA,
Inc.
|
||||||||||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
263,868
|
$
|
(55,666
|
)
|
$
|
8,351
|
$
|
2,288
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
218,841
|
||||||
Restricted
cash
|
—
|
5,641
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
5,641
|
|||||||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
—
|
64,680
|
1,247
|
166
|
—
|
66,093
|
|||||||||||||
Owned
inventory
|
—
|
2,909,285
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
2,909,285
|
|||||||||||||
Consolidated
inventory not owned
|
—
|
462,296
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
462,296
|
|||||||||||||
Residential
mortgage loans available-for-sale
|
—
|
—
|
10,337
|
—
|
—
|
10,337
|
|||||||||||||
Investments
in unconsolidated joint ventures
|
3,093
|
125,262
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
128,355
|
|||||||||||||
Deferred
tax assets
|
110,871
|
—
|
(7
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
110,864
|
||||||||||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
—
|
25,044
|
869
|
23
|
—
|
25,936
|
|||||||||||||
Goodwill
|
—
|
121,368
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
121,368
|
|||||||||||||
Investments
in subsidiaries
|
1,718,625
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(1,718,625
|
)
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Intercompany
|
1,158,128
|
(1,235,296
|
)
|
51,132
|
26,036
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Other
assets
|
20,756
|
102,410
|
500
|
8,342
|
—
|
132,008
|
|||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
3,275,341
|
$
|
2,525,024
|
$
|
72,429
|
$
|
36,855
|
$
|
(1,718,625
|
)
|
$
|
4,191,024
|
||||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Trade
accounts payable
|
—
|
87,098
|
45
|
151
|
—
|
87,294
|
|||||||||||||
Other
payables and accrued liabilities
|
39,079
|
350,922
|
2,194
|
10,298
|
—
|
402,493
|
|||||||||||||
Intercompany
|
(1,664
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
1,664
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Obligations
related to consolidated inventory not
owned
|
—
|
335,629
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
335,629
|
|||||||||||||
Senior
notes (net of discounts of $3,302)
|
1,531,698
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
1,531,698
|
|||||||||||||
Junior
subordinated notes
|
103,093
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
103,093
|
|||||||||||||
Warehouse
line
|
—
|
—
|
9,350
|
—
|
—
|
9,350
|
|||||||||||||
Other
notes payable
|
—
|
118,332
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
118,332
|
|||||||||||||
Total
liabilities
|
1,672,206
|
891,981
|
11,589
|
12,113
|
—
|
2,587,889
|
|||||||||||||
Stockholders’
equity
|
1,603,135
|
1,633,043
|
60,840
|
24,742
|
(1,718,625
|
)
|
1,603,135
|
||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’
equity
|
$
|
3,275,341
|
$
|
2,525,024
|
$
|
72,429
|
$
|
36,855
|
$
|
(1,718,625
|
)
|
$
|
4,191,024
|
20
Beazer
Homes USA, Inc.
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet Information
September
30, 2006
(in
thousands)
Beazer
Homes
USA,
Inc.
|
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
|
Beazer
Mortgage
Corp
|
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
|
Consolidating
Adjustments
|
Consolidated
Beazer
Homes
USA,
Inc.
|
||||||||||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
254,915
|
$
|
(105,158
|
)
|
$
|
5,664
|
$
|
7,149
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
162,570
|
||||||
Restricted
cash
|
—
|
4,873
|
5,000
|
—
|
—
|
9,873
|
|||||||||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
—
|
328,740
|
4,329
|
502
|
—
|
333,571
|
|||||||||||||
Owned
inventory
|
—
|
3,048,891
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
3,048,891
|
|||||||||||||
Consolidated
inventory not owned
|
—
|
471,441
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
471,441
|
|||||||||||||
Residential
mortgage loans available-for-sale
|
—
|
—
|
92,157
|
—
|
—
|
92,157
|
|||||||||||||
Investments
in unconsolidated joint ventures
|
3,093
|
119,706
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
122,799
|
|||||||||||||
Deferred
tax assets
|
59,345
|
—
|
497
|
—
|
—
|
59,842
|
|||||||||||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
—
|
28,454
|
954
|
57
|
—
|
29,465
|
|||||||||||||
Goodwill
|
—
|
121,368
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
121,368
|
|||||||||||||
Investments
in subsidiaries
|
1,829,969
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(1,829,969
|
)
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Intercompany
|
1,250,702
|
(1,328,310
|
)
|
52,397
|
25,211
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Other
assets
|
22,751
|
74,751
|
2,419
|
7,533
|
—
|
107,454
|
|||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
3,420,775
|
$
|
2,764,756
|
$
|
163,417
|
$
|
40,452
|
$
|
(1,829,969
|
)
|
$
|
4,559,431
|
||||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Trade
accounts payable
|
—
|
140,902
|
132
|
97
|
—
|
141,131
|
|||||||||||||
Other
payables and accrued liabilities
|
66,296
|
456,706
|
9,166
|
14,846
|
—
|
547,014
|
|||||||||||||
Intercompany
|
(1,959
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
1,959
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Obligations
related to consolidated inventory not
owned
|
—
|
330,703
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
330,703
|
|||||||||||||
Senior
notes (net of discounts of $3,578)
|
1,551,422
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
1,551,422
|
|||||||||||||
Junior
subordinated notes
|
103,093
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
103,093
|
|||||||||||||
Warehouse
line
|
—
|
—
|
94,881
|
—
|
—
|
94,881
|
|||||||||||||
Other
notes payable
|
—
|
89,264
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
89,264
|
|||||||||||||
Total
liabilities
|
1,718,852
|
1,017,575
|
104,179
|
16,902
|
—
|
2,857,508
|
|||||||||||||
Stockholders’
equity
|
1,701,923
|
1,747,181
|
59,238
|
23,550
|
(1,829,969
|
)
|
1,701,923
|
||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’
equity
|
$
|
3,420,775
|
$
|
2,764,756
|
$
|
163,417
|
$
|
40,452
|
$
|
(1,829,969
|
)
|
$
|
4,559,431
|
21
Beazer
Homes USA, Inc.
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income Information
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2007
(in
thousands)
Beazer
Homes USA, Inc.
|
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
|
Beazer
Mortgage Corp.
|
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
|
Consolidating
Adjustments
|
Consolidated
Beazer Homes USA, Inc.
|
||||||||||||||
Total
revenue
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
819,075
|
$
|
9,339
|
$
|
1,491
|
$
|
(3,610
|
)
|
$
|
826,295
|
||||||
Home
construction and land sales expenses
|
25,559
|
679,080
|
—
|
—
|
(3,610
|
)
|
701,029
|
||||||||||||
Inventory
impairments and option contract abandonments
|
—
|
79,854
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
79,854
|
|||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
(25,559
|
)
|
60,141
|
9,339
|
1,491
|
—
|
45,412
|
||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
—
|
101,262
|
7,976
|
491
|
—
|
109,729
|
|||||||||||||
Operating
(loss) income
|
(25,559
|
)
|
(41,121
|
)
|
1,363
|
1,000
|
—
|
(64,317
|
)
|
||||||||||
Equity
in loss of unconsolidated joint ventures
|
—
|
(7,692
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(7,692
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Royalty
and management fee expense
|
—
|
532
|
(532
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Other
income, net
|
—
|
2,646
|
48
|
—
|
—
|
2,694
|
|||||||||||||
(Loss)
income before income taxes
|
(25,559
|
)
|
(45,635
|
)
|
879
|
1,000
|
—
|
(69,315
|
)
|
||||||||||
(Benefit)
provision for income taxes
|
(9,585
|
)
|
(17,347
|
)
|
330
|
376
|
—
|
(26,226
|
)
|
||||||||||
Equity
in loss of subsidiaries
|
(27,115
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
27,115
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$
|
(43,089
|
)
|
$
|
(28,288
|
)
|
$
|
549
|
$
|
624
|
$
|
27,115
|
$
|
(43,089
|
)
|
||||
Beazer
Homes USA, Inc.
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income Information
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2006
(in
thousands)
Beazer
Homes USA, Inc.
|
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
|
Beazer
Mortgage Corp.
|
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
|
Consolidating
Adjustments
|
Consolidated
Beazer Homes USA, Inc.
|
||||||||||||||
Total
revenue
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
1,258,531
|
$
|
13,135
|
$
|
1,924
|
$
|
(4,499
|
)
|
$
|
1,269,091
|
||||||
Home
construction and land sales expenses
|
20,542
|
928,949
|
—
|
—
|
(4,499
|
)
|
944,992
|
||||||||||||
Inventory
impairments and option contract abandonments
|
—
|
9,604
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
9,604
|
|||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
(20,542
|
)
|
319,978
|
13,135
|
1,924
|
—
|
314,495
|
||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
—
|
139,153
|
10,188
|
452
|
—
|
149,793
|
|||||||||||||
Operating
(loss) income
|
(20,542
|
)
|
180,825
|
2,947
|
1,472
|
—
|
164,702
|
||||||||||||
Equity
in income of unconsolidated joint ventures
|
—
|
330
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
330
|
|||||||||||||
Royalty
and management fee expense
|
32,423
|
(31,219
|
)
|
(1,204
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||
Other
income, net
|
—
|
1,601
|
—
|
(19
|
)
|
—
|
1,582
|
||||||||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
11,881
|
151,537
|
1,743
|
1,453
|
—
|
166,614
|
|||||||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
4,451
|
56,614
|
654
|
544
|
—
|
62,263
|
|||||||||||||
Equity
in income of subsidiaries
|
96,921
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(96,921
|
)
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$
|
104,351
|
$
|
94,923
|
$
|
1,089
|
$
|
909
|
$
|
(96,921
|
)
|
$
|
104,351
|
22
Beazer
Homes USA, Inc.
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income Information
Six
Months Ended March 31, 2007
(in
thousands)
Beazer
Homes USA, Inc.
|
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
|
Beazer
Mortgage Corp.
|
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
|
Consolidating
Adjustments
|
Consolidated
Beazer Homes USA, Inc.
|
||||||||||||||
Total
revenue
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
1,614,120
|
$
|
19,278
|
$
|
2,913
|
$
|
(7,002
|
)
|
$
|
1,629,309
|
||||||
Home
construction and land sales expenses
|
45,674
|
1,324,339
|
—
|
—
|
(7,002
|
)
|
1,363,011
|
||||||||||||
Inventory
impairments and option contract abandonments
|
—
|
199,777
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
199,777
|
|||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
(45,674
|
)
|
90,004
|
19,278
|
2,913
|
—
|
66,521
|
||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
—
|
208,356
|
15,734
|
1,007
|
—
|
225,097
|
|||||||||||||
Operating
(loss) income
|
(45,674
|
)
|
(118,352
|
)
|
3,544
|
1,906
|
—
|
(158,576
|
)
|
||||||||||
Equity
in loss of unconsolidated joint ventures
|
—
|
(10,052
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(10,052
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Royalty
and management fee expense
|
—
|
1,099
|
(1,099
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Other
income, net
|
—
|
4,569
|
118
|
—
|
—
|
4,687
|
|||||||||||||
(Loss)
income before income taxes
|
(45,674
|
)
|
(122,736
|
)
|
2,563
|
1,906
|
—
|
(163,941
|
)
|
||||||||||
(Benefit)
provision for income taxes
|
(17,128
|
)
|
(46,393
|
)
|
961
|
714
|
—
|
(61,846
|
)
|
||||||||||
Equity
in loss of subsidiaries
|
(73,549
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
73,549
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Net
(loss) income
|
$
|
(102,095
|
)
|
$
|
(76,343
|
)
|
$
|
1,602
|
$
|
1,192
|
$
|
73,549
|
$
|
(102,095
|
)
|
Beazer
Homes USA, Inc.
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Income Information
Six
Months Ended March 31, 2006
(in
thousands)
Beazer
Homes USA, Inc.
|
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
|
Beazer
Mortgage Corp.
|
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
|
Consolidating
Adjustments
|
Consolidated
Beazer Homes USA, Inc.
|
||||||||||||||
Total
revenue
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
2,355,179
|
$
|
24,113
|
$
|
3,658
|
$
|
(8,243
|
)
|
$
|
2,374,707
|
||||||
Home
construction and land sales expenses
|
38,717
|
1,744,377
|
—
|
—
|
(8,243
|
)
|
1,774,851
|
||||||||||||
Inventory
impairments and option contract abandonments
|
—
|
12,531
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
12,531
|
|||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
(38,717
|
)
|
598,271
|
24,113
|
3,658
|
—
|
587,325
|
||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
—
|
261,068
|
20,871
|
932
|
—
|
282,871
|
|||||||||||||
Operating
(loss) income
|
(38,717
|
)
|
337,203
|
3,242
|
2,726
|
—
|
304,454
|
||||||||||||
Equity
in income of unconsolidated joint ventures
|
—
|
682
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
682
|
|||||||||||||
Royalty
and management fee expense
|
53,049
|
(51,672
|
)
|
(1,377
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||
Other
income, net
|
—
|
5,704
|
—
|
(19
|
)
|
—
|
5,685
|
||||||||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
14,332
|
291,917
|
1,865
|
2,707
|
—
|
310,821
|
|||||||||||||
Provision
for income taxes
|
5,374
|
109,467
|
700
|
1,016
|
—
|
116,557
|
|||||||||||||
Equity
in income of subsidiaries
|
185,306
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(185,306
|
)
|
—
|
||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$
|
194,264
|
$
|
182,450
|
$
|
1,165
|
$
|
1,691
|
$
|
(185,306
|
)
|
$
|
194,264
|
23
Beazer
Homes USA, Inc.
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Information
Six
Months Ended March 31, 2007
(in
thousands)
|
|
Beazer
Homes
USA,
Inc.
|
|
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
|
|
Beazer
Mortgage
Corp.
|
|
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
|
|
Consolidated
Beazer
Homes
USA,
Inc.
|
|
|||||
Net
cash (used in)/provided by operating activities
|
$
|
(108,506
|
)
|
$
|
213,112
|
$
|
82,450
|
$
|
(3,743
|
)
|
$
|
183,313
|
||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Capital
expenditures, net
|
—
|
(1,849
|
)
|
(139
|
)
|
—
|
(1,988
|
)
|
||||||||
Investments
in unconsolidated joint ventures
|
—
|
(16,906
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
(16,906
|
)
|
|||||||||
Changes
in restricted cash
|
—
|
(768
|
)
|
5,000
|
—
|
4,232
|
||||||||||
Distributions
from unconsolidated joint ventures
|
—
|
1,196
|
—
|
—
|
1,196
|
|||||||||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
—
|
(18,327
|
)
|
4,861
|
—
|
(13,466
|
)
|
|||||||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Borrowings
under credit facilities
|
—
|
—
|
91,258
|
—
|
91,258
|
|||||||||||
Repayment
of credit facilities
|
—
|
—
|
(176,789
|
)
|
—
|
(176,789
|
)
|
|||||||||
Repayment
of other notes payable
|
—
|
(6,445
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
(6,445
|
)
|
|||||||||
Repurchase
of senior notes
|
(20,563
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(20,563
|
)
|
|||||||||
Debt
issuance costs
|
—
|
—
|
(319
|
)
|
—
|
(319
|
)
|
|||||||||
Common
stock redeemed
|
(140
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(140
|
)
|
|||||||||
Proceeds
from stock option exercises
|
4,009
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
4,009
|
|||||||||||
Tax
benefit from stock transactions
|
3,219
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
3,219
|
|||||||||||
Dividends
paid
|
(7,806
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(7,806
|
)
|
|||||||||
Advances
to/from subsidiaries
|
137,974
|
(138,082
|
)
|
1,226
|
(1,118
|
)
|
—
|
|||||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
116,693
|
(144,527
|
)
|
(84,624
|
)
|
(1,118
|
)
|
(113,576
|
)
|
|||||||
Increase/(decrease)
in cash and cash equivalents
|
8,187
|
50,258
|
2,687
|
(4,861
|
)
|
56,271
|
||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
254,915
|
(105,158
|
)
|
5,664
|
7,149
|
162,570
|
||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
263,102
|
$
|
(54,900
|
)
|
$
|
8,351
|
$
|
2,288
|
$
|
218,841
|
24
Beazer
Homes USA, Inc.
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Information
Six
Months Ended March 31, 2006
(in
thousands)
|
Beazer
Homes
USA,
Inc.
|
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
|
Beazer
Mortgage
Corp.
|
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
|
Consolidated
Beazer
Homes
USA,
Inc.
|
|||||||||||
Net
cash (used in)/provided by operating activities
|
$
|
2,791
|
$
|
(325,218
|
)
|
$
|
(26,285
|
)
|
$
|
3,030
|
$
|
(345,682
|
)
|
|||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Capital
expenditures, net
|
—
|
(7,095
|
)
|
(240
|
)
|
—
|
(7,335
|
)
|
||||||||
Investments
in unconsolidated joint ventures
|
—
|
(36,668
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
(36,668
|
)
|
|||||||||
Distributions
from unconsolidated joint ventures
|
—
|
2,911
|
—
|
—
|
2,911
|
|||||||||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
—
|
(40,852
|
)
|
(240
|
)
|
—
|
(41,092
|
)
|
||||||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Borrowings
under credit facilities
|
663,900
|
—
|
35,569
|
—
|
699,469
|
|||||||||||
Repayment
of credit facilities
|
(527,300
|
)
|
—
|
(7,512
|
)
|
—
|
(534,812
|
)
|
||||||||
Repayment
of other notes payable
|
—
|
(5,354
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
(5,354
|
)
|
|||||||||
Debt
issuance costs
|
—
|
—
|
(871
|
)
|
—
|
(871
|
)
|
|||||||||
Treasury
stock purchases
|
(133,207
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(133,207
|
)
|
|||||||||
Proceeds
from stock option exercises
|
6,574
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
6,574
|
|||||||||||
Tax
benefit from stock transactions
|
6,893
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
6,893
|
|||||||||||
Dividends
paid
|
(8,250
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
(8,250
|
)
|
|||||||||
Net
change in book overdraft
|
74,417
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
74,417
|
|||||||||||
Advances
to/from subsidiaries
|
(356,083
|
)
|
353,769
|
5,125
|
(2,811
|
)
|
—
|
|||||||||
Net
cash (used in)/provided by financing activities
|
(273,056
|
)
|
348,415
|
32,311
|
(2,811
|
)
|
104,859
|
|||||||||
(Decrease)/increase
in cash and cash equivalents
|
(270,265
|
)
|
(17,655
|
)
|
5,786
|
219
|
(281,915
|
)
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
386,423
|
(90,238
|
)
|
230
|
683
|
297,098
|
||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
116,158
|
$
|
(107,893
|
)
|
$
|
6,016
|
$
|
902
|
$
|
15,183
|
25
OVERVIEW:
Homebuilding.
We design, sell and build single-family homes in the following geographic
regions which are presented as our reportable segments. Those remaining
homebuilding operations not separately reportable as segments are included
in
“Other”:
West
|
Mid-Atlantic
|
Florida
|
Southeast
|
Other
|
||||
Arizona
|
Delaware
|
Florida
|
Georgia
|
Colorado
|
||||
California
|
Maryland
|
Nashville,
TN
|
Indiana
|
|||||
Nevada
|
New
Jersey
|
North
Carolina
|
Kentucky
|
|||||
New
Mexico
|
New
York
|
South
Carolina
|
Memphis,
TN
|
|||||
Pennsylvania
|
Ohio
|
|||||||
Virginia
|
Texas
|
|||||||
West
Virginia
|
We
intend, subject to market conditions, to expand in our current markets through
focused product expansion and price point diversification and to consider
entering new markets either through expansion from existing markets or through
acquisitions of established homebuilders. Our business strategy emphasizes
further increasing our market penetration in those markets in which we currently
operate most profitably, while continuously reviewing opportunities to curtail
or limit investment in less profitable markets.
Our
homes
are designed to appeal to homeowners at various price points across various
demographic segments, and are generally offered for sale in advance of their
construction. Our objective is to provide our customers at each price-point
with
homes that incorporate exceptional value and quality while seeking to maximize
our return on invested capital. To achieve this objective, we have developed
a
business strategy which focuses on geographic diversity and growth markets,
leveraging our national brand, leveraging our size, scale and capabilities
in
order to optimize efficiencies and providing quality homes at various price
points to meet the needs of diverse home buyers.
Our
product strategy entails addressing the needs of an increasingly diverse
profile
of buyers as evidenced by demographic trends including, among others, increased
immigration, changing profiles of households, the aging of the baby-boomers,
and
the rise of the echo-boomers (children of the baby-boomers) into the ranks
of
homeownership. Our product offering is broken down into three product
categories: economy, value and style.
In
addition, we offer homes in all three categories to the ‘active adult’ market
which are targeted to buyers over 55 years of age, in communities with special
amenities. Within each product category, we seek to provide exceptional value
and to ensure an enjoyable customer experience.
Seasonal
and Quarterly Variability:
Our
homebuilding operating cycle generally reflects escalating new order activity
in
the second and third fiscal quarters and increased closings in the third
and
fourth fiscal quarters.
Financial
Services: Recognizing
the homebuyer’s desire
to
simplify the financing process, we originate mortgages on behalf of our
customers through our wholly-owned subsidiary Beazer Mortgage Corporation,
or
Beazer Mortgage. Beazer Mortgage originates, processes and brokers mortgages
to
third party investors. Beazer Mortgage also finances certain of our mortgage
lending activities with borrowings under a warehouse line of credit or from
general corporate funds prior to selling the loans and their servicing rights
shortly after origination to third-party investors. We also provide title
services to our customers in many of our markets.
26
Additional
Products and Services for Homebuyers: In
order
to maximize our profitability and provide our customers with the additional
products and services that they desire, we have incorporated design centers
into
our business. Recognizing that our customers want to choose certain components
of their new home, we offer limited customization through the use of design
studios in most of our markets. These design studios allow the customer to
select certain non-structural customizations for their homes such as cabinetry,
flooring, fixtures, appliances and wall coverings.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements: In
July
2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting
for Uncertainty in
Income
Taxes - An Interpretation
of
FASB
Statement No. 109
(“FIN
48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized
in the financial statements in accordance with SFAS 109, Accounting
for Income Taxes.
FIN 48
prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial
statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected
to be
taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition,
classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods,
disclosure, and transition. FIN 48 is effective beginning in our fiscal year
2008. We are currently evaluating the impact adopting FIN 48 will have on
our
consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
On
November 29, 2006, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 06-8, Applicability
of the Assessment of a Buyer’s Continuing Investment under FASB Statement No.
66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate, for Sales of
Condominiums.
EITF
06-8 states that the adequacy of the buyer’s continuing investment under SFAS 66
should be assessed in determining whether to recognize profit under the
percentage-of-completion method on the sale of individual units in a condominium
project. This consensus requires that additional deposits be collected by
developers of condominium projects that wish to recognize profit during the
construction period under the percentage-of-completion method. EITF 06-8
is
effective for fiscal years beginning in our fiscal year 2008. We are currently
evaluating the impact adopting EITF 06-8 will have on our consolidated financial
condition and results of operations.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS:
Three
Months Ended
March 31, |
Six
Months Ended
March
31,
|
||||||||||||
($
in thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
2006
|
2006
|
|||||||||
Revenues:
|
|||||||||||||
Homebuilding
(a)
|
$
|
777,140
|
$
|
1,239,859
|
$
|
1,559,136
|
$
|
2,313,286
|
|||||
Land
and lot
|
41,539
|
20,596
|
54,206
|
45,551
|
|||||||||
Financial
Services
|
11,226
|
13,135
|
22,969
|
24,113
|
|||||||||
Intercompany
elimination
|
(3,610
|
)
|
(4,499
|
)
|
(7,002
|
)
|
(8,243
|
)
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
826,295
|
$
|
1,269,091
|
$
|
1,629,309
|
$
|
2,374,707
|
27
Three
Months Ended
March 31, |
Six
Months Ended
March
31,
|
||||||||||||
($
in thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit:
|
|||||||||||||
Homebuilding
(b)
|
$
|
36,054
|
$
|
299,226
|
$
|
41,356
|
$
|
561,376
|
|||||
Land
and lot
|
(1,868
|
)
|
2,134
|
2,196
|
1,836
|
||||||||
Financial
Services
|
11,226
|
13,135
|
22,969
|
24,113
|
|||||||||
Total
|
$
|
45,412
|
$
|
314,495
|
$
|
66,521
|
$
|
587,325
|
(a) |
Homebuilding
revenues for the three and six months ended March 31, 2007 include
$1.8
million and $29.5 million of net revenue previously deferred
in accordance
with SFAS 66 for
certain homes with mortgages originated by Beazer Mortgage for
which the
sale of the related mortgage loan to a third-party investor had
not been
completed as of the balance sheet date. Homebuilding
revenue for the three and six months ended March 31, 2006 exclude
$9.7
million of revenues deferred in accordance with SFAS
66.
|
(b) |
Homebuilding
gross profit for the three and six months ended March 31, 2007
includes
$79.9 million and $199.8 million of non-cash, pretax charges
related to
the inventory impairments and the abandonment of lot option contracts,
and
approximately $9.6 million and $12.5 million of such charges
for the three
and six months ended March 31, 2006,
respectively.
|
Three
Months Ended
March 31, |
Six
Months Ended
March
31,
|
||||||||||||
($
in thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative (SG&A) expenses:
|
|||||||||||||
Homebuilding
|
$
|
100,549
|
$
|
139,605
|
$
|
207,404
|
$
|
262,000
|
|||||
Financial
Services
|
9,180
|
10,188
|
17,693
|
20,871
|
|||||||||
Total
|
$
|
109,729
|
$
|
149,793
|
$
|
225,097
|
$
|
282,871
|
|||||
As
a percentage of total revenue:
|
|||||||||||||
Gross
margin
|
5.5
|
%
|
24.8
|
%
|
4.1
|
%
|
24.7
|
%
|
|||||
SG&A
- homebuilding
|
12.2
|
%
|
11.0
|
%
|
12.7
|
%
|
11.0
|
%
|
|||||
SG&A
- Financial Services
|
1.1
|
%
|
0.8
|
%
|
1.1
|
%
|
0.9
|
%
|
Revenues: Revenues
decreased by 34.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2007 from the
same
period in the prior year due to a 35.8% reduction in the number of homes
closed.
Continued moderation of demand compared to last year resulted in decreased
closings throughout most of our markets. Home closings decreased most
significantly in our Florida, Mid-Atlantic and West regions, and in parts
of our
Southeast region, including certain of our North Carolina and South Carolina
markets.
Revenues
and homes closed decreased by 31.4% and 33.3%, respectively, for the
six months
ended March 31, 2007 compared to the same period in the prior year. Home
closings decreased in most of our markets, but most significantly in
our Florida
and Mid-Atlantic regions, and in parts of our Southeast region, including
our
North Carolina market, and in parts of our West region, including our
Arizona,
Nevada and certain southern California markets.
28
As
we
continued to review opportunities to minimize underperforming investments and
reallocate funds to investments that will optimize overall returns, we sold
off
certain land positions generating revenues from land and lot sales. We had
approximately $41.5 million and $54.2 million of land and lot sales in the
three
and six months ended March 31, 2007 compared to $20.6 million and $45.6 million
in the comparable periods of 2006.
New
Orders and Backlog: New
orders, net of cancellations, decreased modestly by 3.3% to 4,085 units during
the three months ended March 31, 2007, compared to 4,224 units for the same
period in the prior year. The modest decrease in new orders, despite
significantly weaker market conditions in the second quarter of fiscal 2007
as
compared with the same period last year, was primarily due to a national
promotion campaign, characterized by significant price discounting and sales
incentives, during the three months ended March 31, 2007. During the quarter
ended March 31, 2007, we experienced a cancellation rate of 29% compared to
33%
in the same period of the prior year and 43% for the first quarter of fiscal
2007.
New
orders, net of cancellations, decreased to 5,864 units, or 27.6%, during the
six
months ended March 31, 2007, compared to 8,096 units for the same period in
the
prior year. New orders decreased throughout all of our regions, but most
significantly new orders decreased by 50.2% in our Florida region and 31.2%
in
our other homebuilding segment compared to the same six-month period in the
prior fiscal year. This decrease is due to lower demand and higher
cancellations, primarily in the first quarter of fiscal 2007, compared to the
high number of new orders received in the six months ended March 31, 2006.
The
significant decrease in new orders during the six months ended March 31, 2007
was moderated by the relative strength of new orders during the three months
ended March 31, 2007 as a result of our national sales promotion. The
cancellation rate for the six months ended March 31, 2007 was 34%, an increase
compared to the cancellation rates of 30% for the same period in the prior
year,
primarily due to the high cancellation rate of 43% for the first quarter of
fiscal 2007.
The
aggregate dollar value of homes in backlog at March 31, 2007 of $1.67 billion
decreased 40.2% from $2.79 billion at March 31, 2006, related to a decrease
in
the number of homes in backlog from 9,227 units at March 31, 2006 to 5,563
units
at March 31, 2007. The decrease in the number of homes in backlog across all
of
our markets is driven primarily by the aforementioned market weakness and higher
rate of cancellations.
Gross
Margin: Gross
margin for the three months ended March 31, 2007 was 5.5% compared to a gross
margin of 24.8% for the same period in the prior year. Gross margins for the
second quarter continued to be negatively impacted by both higher levels of
discounting and reduced revenue volume as compared to the same period a year
ago. In addition, we incurred non-cash, pretax charges of $60.8 million for
inventory impairments and $19.1 million for the abandonment of certain land
option contracts. Gross margin for the quarter ended March 31 also includes
a
reduction in the accrual and costs related to the Trinity class action
litigation settlement of $6.0 million in 2007 and $6.5 million in
2006.
Gross
margin for the six months ended March 31, 2007 was 4.1% and was significantly
impacted by reduced revenues in certain of our historically higher margin
markets, increased sales incentives given to customers, higher levels of
discounting and non-cash, pretax charges of $44.2 million to abandon land option
contracts and $155.5 million of inventory impairments. Gross margin for the
six
months ended March 31, 2006 was 24.7%.
29
Selling,
General and Administrative Expense:
Selling,
general and administrative expense (SG&A) totaled $109.7 million and $225.1
million for the three and six months ended March 31, 2007, and $149.8 million
and $282.9 million for the three and six months ended March 31, 2006,
respectively. The decrease in SG&A expense for the three and six months
ended March 31, 2007 compared to the same periods of the prior year is due
to
lower salary expense as a result of the realignment of our overhead structure
and lower sales commissions related to decreased revenues. Homebuilding SG&A
expense as a percentage of total revenue for the three and six months ended
March 31, 2007 increased to 12.2% and 12.7%, respectively, from 11.0% for both
the three and six months ended March 31, 2006 due to the impact of reduced
revenues on fixed overhead expenses.
Segment
Analysis ($ in thousands)
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
Six
Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||
2007
|
|
Change
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
Change
|
|
2006
|
|||||||||
West
|
|||||||||||||||||||
New
orders, net
|
1,054
|
22.3
|
%
|
862
|
1,497
|
(22.8
|
)%
|
1,938
|
|||||||||||
Closings
|
674
|
(45.9
|
)
|
1,246
|
1,403
|
(37.8
|
)
|
2,257
|
|||||||||||
Backlog
units
|
1,269
|
(52.6
|
)
|
2,675
|
1,269
|
(52.6
|
)
|
2,675
|
|||||||||||
Average
sales price per home closed
|
$
|
348.4
|
(7.0
|
)
|
$
|
374.8
|
$
|
361.6
|
(1.6
|
)
|
$
|
367.6
|
|||||||
Homebuilding
revenue
|
$
|
233,971
|
(49.0
|
)
|
$
|
458,469
|
$
|
520,928
|
(36.6
|
)
|
$
|
821,249
|
|||||||
Land
& lot sale revenue
|
$
|
32,751
|
144.7
|
$
|
13,385
|
$
|
43,701
|
127.6
|
$
|
19,197
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit
|
$
|
3,823
|
(96.9
|
)
|
$
|
121,711
|
$
|
5,806
|
(97.3
|
)
|
$
|
213,538
|
|||||||
Operating
(loss) income
|
$
|
(20,607
|
)
|
(123.6
|
)
|
$
|
87,242
|
$
|
(47,111
|
)
|
(131.2
|
)
|
$
|
150,981
|
|||||
Mid-Atlantic
|
|||||||||||||||||||
New
orders,
net
|
559
|
8.1
|
517
|
795
|
(0.6
|
)
|
800
|
||||||||||||
Closings
|
209
|
(58.4
|
)
|
502
|
407
|
(57.4
|
)
|
955
|
|||||||||||
Backlog
units
|
965
|
(7.0
|
)
|
1,038
|
965
|
(7.0
|
)
|
1,038
|
|||||||||||
Average
sales price per home closed
|
$
|
454.7
|
(2.1
|
)
|
$
|
464.4
|
$
|
457.5
|
1.0
|
$
|
453.0
|
||||||||
Homebuilding
revenue
|
$
|
102,366
|
(56.1
|
)
|
$
|
233,108
|
$
|
194,594
|
(55.0
|
)
|
$
|
432,614
|
|||||||
Land
& lot sale revenue
|
$
|
—
|
N/A
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
N/A
|
$
|
—
|
|||||||||
Gross
(loss) profit
|
$
|
(5,175
|
)
|
(107.0
|
)
|
$
|
73,478
|
$
|
4,545
|
(96.8
|
)
|
$
|
140,362
|
||||||
Operating
(loss) income
|
$
|
(17,221
|
)
|
(132.4
|
)
|
$
|
53,115
|
$
|
(20,472
|
)
|
(120.0
|
)
|
$
|
102,616
|
|||||
Florida
|
|||||||||||||||||||
New
orders, net
|
441
|
5.5
|
418
|
534
|
(50.2
|
)
|
1,073
|
||||||||||||
Closings
|
349
|
(34.9
|
)
|
536
|
595
|
(41.3
|
)
|
1,013
|
|||||||||||
Backlog
units
|
447
|
(66.1
|
)
|
1,319
|
447
|
(66.1
|
)
|
1,319
|
|||||||||||
Average
sales price per home closed
|
$
|
307.5
|
(1.8
|
)
|
$
|
313.0
|
$
|
319.2
|
3.2
|
$
|
309.3
|
||||||||
Homebuilding
revenue
|
$
|
106,409
|
(36.6
|
)
|
$
|
167,769
|
$
|
197,654
|
(36.9
|
)
|
$
|
313,350
|
|||||||
Land
& lot sale revenue
|
$
|
—
|
N/A
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
N/A
|
$
|
—
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit (loss)
|
$
|
17,925
|
(67.0
|
)
|
$
|
54,331
|
$
|
(92
|
)
|
(100.1
|
)
|
$
|
98,999
|
||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
$
|
6,773
|
(82.3
|
)
|
$
|
38,256
|
$
|
(21,720
|
)
|
(131.5
|
)
|
$
|
68,887
|
30
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
Six
Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||
2007
|
Change
|
2006
|
2007
|
Change
|
2006
|
||||||||||||||
Southeast
|
|||||||||||||||||||
New
orders, net
|
1,016
|
(11.5
|
)%
|
1,148
|
1,479
|
(26.8
|
)%
|
2,020
|
|||||||||||
Closings
|
729
|
(20.7
|
)
|
919
|
1,408
|
(21.1
|
)
|
1,785
|
|||||||||||
Backlog
units
|
1,392
|
(30.0
|
)
|
1,989
|
1,392
|
(30.0
|
)
|
1,989
|
|||||||||||
Average
sales price per home closed
|
$
|
240.4
|
16.9
|
$
|
205.6
|
$
|
231.6
|
13.0
|
$
|
204.9
|
|||||||||
Homebuilding
revenue
|
$
|
176,877
|
(5.8
|
)
|
$
|
187,865
|
$
|
331,329
|
(9.1
|
)
|
$
|
364,669
|
|||||||
Land
& lot sale revenue
|
$
|
6,749
|
511.3
|
$
|
1,104
|
$
|
7,426
|
502.3
|
$
|
1,233
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit
|
$
|
33,243
|
(7.2
|
)
|
$
|
35,839
|
$
|
60,213
|
(16.2
|
)
|
$
|
71,812
|
|||||||
Operating
income
|
$
|
14,705
|
39.1
|
$
|
10,573
|
$
|
23,139
|
(13.3
|
)
|
$
|
26,676
|
||||||||
Other
homebuilding
|
|||||||||||||||||||
New
orders, net
|
1,015
|
(20.6
|
)
|
1,279
|
1,559
|
(31.2
|
)
|
2,265
|
|||||||||||
Closings
|
782
|
(26.9
|
)
|
1,070
|
1,590
|
(24.0
|
)
|
2,092
|
|||||||||||
Backlog
units
|
1,490
|
(32.5
|
)
|
2,206
|
1,490
|
(32.5
|
)
|
2,206
|
|||||||||||
Average
sales price per home closed
|
$
|
199.8
|
10.9
|
$
|
180.2
|
$
|
196.3
|
7.6
|
$
|
182.4
|
|||||||||
Homebuilding
revenue
|
$
|
157,517
|
(18.2
|
)
|
$
|
192,648
|
$
|
314,631
|
(17.5
|
)
|
$
|
381,404
|
|||||||
Land
& lot sale revenue
|
$
|
2,039
|
(66.6
|
)
|
$
|
6,107
|
$
|
3,079
|
(87.7
|
)
|
$
|
25,121
|
|||||||
Gross
profit
|
$
|
4,283
|
(81.0
|
)
|
$
|
22,534
|
$
|
10,607
|
(78.5
|
)
|
$
|
49,232
|
|||||||
Operating
(loss) income
|
$
|
(16,846
|
)
|
N/M
|
$
|
(7,131
|
)
|
$
|
(32,554
|
)
|
N/M
|
$
|
(6,411
|
)
|
|||||
Financial
Services
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Number
of mortgage originations
|
1,877
|
(33.4
|
)
|
2,818
|
3,567
|
(32.4
|
)
|
5,273
|
|||||||||||
Capture
rate
|
68
|
%
|
3.7
|
66
|
%
|
66
|
%
|
1.4
|
65
|
%
|
|||||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
11,226
|
(14.5
|
)
|
$
|
13,135
|
$
|
22,969
|
(4.7
|
)
|
$
|
24,113
|
|||||||
Operating
income
|
$
|
2,046
|
(30.6
|
)
|
$
|
2,947
|
$
|
5,276
|
62.7
|
$
|
3,242
|
||||||||
West:
Homebuilding revenues decreased for the three months and six months ended March
31, 2007 compared to the same periods of the prior year due to reduced average
sales prices, reduced demand and increased cancellations in the majority of
the
markets in this segment due to softer market conditions and excess capacity
in
both the new home and resale markets. For the three and six months ended March
31, 2007, respectively, homebuilding revenues decreased by 49.0% and 36.6%,
from
the comparable periods of fiscal 2006, driven by decreased closings of 45.9%
and
37.8% for the three and six months ended March 31, 2007, respectively. Gross
margins were 1.4% and 1.0% for the three and six months ended March 31, 2007,
respectively, compared to 25.8% and 25.4% for the comparable periods of fiscal
2006. The decrease in gross margins is primarily due to the impact of inventory
impairments and abandonment of certain option contracts, softer market
conditions, decreased contribution from lower average sales prices, and
increased sales incentives. Total charges for inventory impairments and
abandonment of certain option contracts in the West segment were $30.1 million
and $82.6 million during the three and six months ended March 31, 2007,
respectively. Operating margins were -7.7% and -8.3% for the three and six
months ended March 31, 2007, compared to 18.5% and 18.0% for the three and
six
months ended March 31, 2006, respectively. The decrease in operating margins
is
primarily due to the aforementioned charges, increased concessions offered
to
homebuyers and decreased contribution from lower average sales
prices.
Mid-Atlantic:
Homebuilding revenues in the Mid-Atlantic decreased by 56.1% and 55.0%, driven
by decreased closings of 58.4% and 57.4%, for the three and six months ended
March 31, 2007, respectively, compared to the same periods of fiscal 2006,
due
to decreased closings and increased cancellations driven by excess capacity
in
the resale markets as investors continued to divest of prior home purchases
and
potential homebuyers continue to experience difficulty selling their existing
homes. Gross margins were -5.1% and 2.3% for the three and six months ended
March 31, 2007, respectively, compared to 31.5% and 32.4% for the comparable
periods of fiscal 2006. Operating margins were -16.8% and -10.5% for the three
and six months ended March 31, 2007, compared to 22.8% and 23.7% for the three
and six months ended March 31, 2006, respectively. The decrease in gross and
operating margins is primarily due to the impact of inventory impairments and
abandonment of certain option contracts, softer market conditions, decreased
contribution from lower average sales prices, and increased sales incentives.
Total charges for inventory impairments and abandonments in the Mid-Atlantic
segment were $24.7 million and $31.7 million during the three and six
months ended March 31, 2007, respectively.
31
Florida:
Home
closings in the Florida region decreased by 34.9% and 41.3% for the three and
six months ended March 31, 2007, respectively, compared to the same periods
of
fiscal 2006, due to softening market conditions, excess capacity and increased
competition primarily in our Tampa and Jacksonville markets, driving a decrease
in revenue of 36.6% and 36.9% for the three and six months ended March 31,
2007,
respectively, compared to the same periods of fiscal 2006. Gross margins were
16.8% and 0% for the three and six months ended March 31, 2007, respectively,
compared to 32.4% and 31.6% for the comparable periods of fiscal 2006. The
decrease in gross margins is primarily due to the impact of inventory
impairments and abandonment of certain option contracts, softer market
conditions, decreased contribution from lower average sales prices, and
increased sales incentives. Total charges for inventory impairments and
abandonments in the Florida segment were $8.0 million and $50.3 million during
the three and six months ended March 31, 2007, respectively. Operating margins
were 6.4% and -11.0% for the three and six months ended March 31, 2007,
respectively, compared to 22.8% and 22.0% for the comparable periods of fiscal
2006 due primarily to the aforementioned charges and decreased contributions
from gross margins.
Southeast:
Revenues
in our Southeast region decreased 5.8% and 9.1% for the three and six months
ended March 31, 2007, respectively, compared to the same periods of fiscal
2006,
due to decreased closings mitigated by the increase in average sales prices
due
to changes in product mix. Closings decreased by 20.7% and 21.1% for the three
and six months ended March 31, 2007, respectively, compared to the same periods
of fiscal 2006. The decrease in closings was driven by higher cancellations,
lower demand, increased competition and the start up of new communities. Gross
margins were 18.1% and 17.8% for the three and six months ended March 31, 2007,
respectively, compared to 19.0% and 19.6% for the comparable periods of fiscal
2006. The decrease in gross margins is primarily due to softer market conditions
and the impact of inventory impairments and abandonment of certain option
contracts. Total charges for inventory impairments and abandonments in the
Southeast segment were $2.9 million and $5.8 million during the three and six
months ended March 31, 2007, respectively. Operating margins were 8.0% and
6.8%
for the three and six months ended March 31, 2007, respectively, compared to
5.6% and 7.3% for the comparable periods of fiscal 2006. The increase in
operating margins for the three months ended March 31, 2007 over the comparable
period of 2006 is primarily due to cost control initiatives implemented
beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2007.
Other
homebuilding:
Revenues
in all markets in our other homebuilding region decreased for the three and
six
months ended March 31, 2007, with the exception of our Houston market, due
to
decreased closings as a result of softer market conditions and excess capacity
in both the new home and resale markets. Gross margins were 2.7% and 3.3% for
the three and six months ended March 31, 2007, respectively, compared to 11.3%
and 12.1% for the comparable periods of fiscal 2006. Operating margins were
-10.6% and -10.2% for the three and six months ended March 31, 2007,
respectively, compared to -3.6% and -1.6% for the comparable periods of fiscal
2006. The decrease in gross margins is primarily due to the impact of inventory
impairments and abandonment of certain option contracts, softer market
conditions, and increased sales incentives. Total charges for inventory
impairments and abandonments in the other homebuilding segment were $14.6
million and $28.5 million during the three and six months ended March 31, 2007,
respectively.
32
Financial
Services:
Our
capture rate (the percentage of mortgages we originate as a percentage of homes
closed) of mortgages originated for customers of our homebuilding business,
which is the most significant source of revenue in this segment, increased
slightly for the three and six months ended March 31, 2007 to 68% and 66%,
respectively, compared to 66% and 65%, respectively, in the same periods of
fiscal 2006. All costs related to Financial Services are included in selling,
general and administrative expenses. Operating income for Financial Services
decreased for the three months ended March 31, 2007 from the comparable period
of 2006 due primarily to a 33.4% decrease in the number of mortgage
originations. Operating income for the six months ended March 31, 2007 increased
from the prior year due to the inclusion of Title Services in Financial Services
beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006.
Corporate
and unallocated:
Corporate and unallocated costs totaled $33.2 million and $65.1 million for
the
three and six months ended March 31, 2007, compared to $20.3 million and $41.5
million for the three and six months ended March 31, 2006, respectively. The
increase in corporate and unallocated costs relates primarily to decreased
inventories resulting in lower capitalization of inventory related costs.
Income
Taxes: Our
effective tax rate was 37.8% and 37.7% for the three and six months ended March
31, 2007 and 37.37% and 37.50% for the three and six months ended March 31,
2006, respectively.
FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY:
Our
sources of cash liquidity include, but are not limited to, cash from operations,
amounts available under credit facilities, proceeds from senior notes and other
bank borrowings, the issuance of equity securities and other external sources
of
funds. Our short-term and long-term liquidity depend primarily upon our level
of
net income, working capital management (accounts receivable, accounts payable
and other liabilities) and bank borrowings. We believe that available short-term
and long-term capital resources are sufficient to fund capital expenditures
and
working capital requirements, scheduled debt and dividend payments, and interest
and tax obligations for the next twelve months. However, any material variance
of our operating results or land acquisitions from our projections or
investments in or acquisitions of businesses could require us to obtain
additional equity or debt financing. We plan to use cash generated to invest
in
growing the business, to fund land acquisitions and operations, pay dividends,
and to repurchase our common stock and outstanding Senior Notes as deemed
appropriate. When deemed appropriate, we will continue to fund our share
repurchase program (discussed further below) by limiting or curtailing
operations in underperforming markets while reinvesting in higher margin
markets. We will also continue to evaluate our prospects in future months and
may walk away from additional properties and option contracts depending upon
the
health of the market in general, and locally. However, at this time we believe
that as of March 31, 2007, we have recorded all known impairments and
abandonments.
At
March
31, 2007, we had total cash of $224.5 million, compared to $172.4 million at
September 30, 2006. The increase in cash was primarily due to lower accounts
receivable outstanding and lower inventory purchases, both related to a lower
number of closings and new orders, net of cancellations. Our net cash provided
by operating activities for the six months ended March 31, 2007 was $183.3
million compared to a net use of funds of $345.7 million in the same period
of
fiscal 2006 due to strong sales in the prior year which drove increases in
inventory.
33
Net
cash
used in investing activities was $13.5
million for the six months ended March 31, 2007 compared to $41.1 million for
the same period of fiscal 2006, as we continued to fund existing unconsolidated
joint ventures through development completion.
Net
cash
used in financing activities was $113.6 million for the six months ended March
31, 2007 due primarily to the net repayments of the Warehouse Line related
to
the reduction in new orders and the related new mortgage originations. In
addition, we voluntarily repurchased $20.0 million of Senior Notes in the open
market during the six months ended March 31, 2007 at a price of $20.6 million.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $104.9 million for the six months
ended March 31, 2006 as increased book overdrafts and net borrowings under
our
Revolving Credit Facility and warehouse line of credit more than offset $133.2
million of common stock repurchases.
At
March
31, 2007 and September 30, 2006 we had the following borrowings (in thousands):
Maturity
Date
|
March
31,
2007 |
September
30,
2006 |
||||||||
Mortgage
Warehouse Line
|
February
2008
|
$
|
9,350
|
$
|
94,881
|
|||||
Revolving
Credit Facility
|
August
2009
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||
8
5/8% Senior Notes*
|
May
2011
|
190,000
|
200,000
|
|||||||
8
3/8% Senior Notes*
|
April
2012
|
340,000
|
350,000
|
|||||||
6
1/2% Senior Notes*
|
November
2013
|
200,000
|
200,000
|
|||||||
6
7/8% Senior Notes*
|
July
2015
|
350,000
|
350,000
|
|||||||
8
1/8% Senior Notes*
|
June
2016
|
275,000
|
275,000
|
|||||||
4
5/8% Convertible Senior Notes*
|
June
2024
|
180,000
|
180,000
|
|||||||
Junior
Subordinated Notes
|
July
2036
|
103,093
|
103,093
|
|||||||
Other
Notes Payable
|
Various
Dates
|
118,332
|
89,264
|
|||||||
Unamortized
debt discounts
|
|
(3,302
|
)
|
(3,578
|
)
|
|||||
Total
|
|
$
|
1,762,473
|
$
|
1,838,660
|
*
|
Collectively,
the “Senior
Notes”
|
Mortgage
Warehouse Line -
On
January 11, 2006, Beazer Mortgage Corporation (“Beazer Mortgage”), our
wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into a 364-day credit agreement with a number
of banks to fund the origination of residential mortgage loans (the “Warehouse
Line”). Beazer Mortgage amended (the “Second Amendment”) the Warehouse Line to
extend the maturity date to February 6, 2008 and to modify the maximum available
borrowing capacity to $100 million (expandable to $200 million), subject to
compliance with the mortgage loan eligibility requirements as provided in the
Second Amendment. The Warehouse Line is secured by certain mortgage loans held
for sale and related property and is not guaranteed by Beazer Homes or any
of
its subsidiaries that are guarantors of the Senior Notes or the Revolving Credit
Facility. Beginning in the second quarter of fiscal 2006, Beazer Mortgage
finances a portion of its mortgage lending activities with borrowings under
the
Warehouse Line. Borrowings under the Warehouse Line were $9.4 million and bore
interest at 6.3% per annum as of March 31, 2007. Beazer Mortgage had a pipeline
of loans in process of approximately $675 million as of March 31, 2007 which
may
be financed either through the Warehouse Line or with third party investors.
34
The
Warehouse Line contains various operating and financial covenants. The Company
was in compliance with such covenants at March 31, 2007.
Revolving
Credit Facility - In
August
2005, we entered into a new four-year unsecured revolving credit facility (the
“Revolving Credit Facility”) with a group of banks which was expanded in June
2006 to $1 billion and which matures in August 2009. The Revolving Credit
Facility includes a $50 million swing line commitment. We have the option to
elect two types of loans under the Revolving Credit Facility which incur
interest as applicable based on either the Alternative Base Rate or the
Applicable Eurodollar Margin (both defined in the Revolving Credit Facility).
The Revolving Credit Facility contains various operating and financial
covenants. We were in compliance with such covenants at March 31, 2007.
Substantially all of our significant subsidiaries are guarantors of the
obligations under the Revolving Credit Facility (see Note 11 to the unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements).
We
fulfill our short-term cash requirements with cash generated from our operations
and funds available from our Revolving Credit Facility. Available
borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility are limited to certain
percentages of homes under contract, unsold homes, substantially improved lots,
lots under development, raw land and accounts receivable. At March 31, 2007,
we
had available borrowings of $232.7 million under the Revolving Credit Facility.
There were no borrowings outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility at
March 31, 2007 or September 30, 2006.
Senior
Notes
- The
Senior Notes are unsecured obligations ranking pari passu with all other
existing and future senior indebtedness. Substantially all of our significant
subsidiaries are full and unconditional guarantors of the Senior Notes and
are
jointly and severally liable for obligations under the Senior Notes and the
Revolving Credit Facility. Each guarantor subsidiary is a 100% owned subsidiary
of Beazer Homes.
The
indentures under which the Senior Notes were issued contain certain restrictive
covenants, including limitations on payment of dividends. At March 31, 2007,
under the most restrictive covenants of each indenture, approximately
$189.8 million of our retained earnings was available for cash dividends and
for
share repurchases. Each indenture provides that, in the event of defined changes
in control or if our consolidated tangible net worth falls below a specified
level or in certain circumstances upon a sale of assets, we are required to
offer to repurchase certain specified amounts of outstanding Senior
Notes.
In
March
2007, we voluntarily repurchased $10.0 million of our outstanding 8 5/8% and
$10.0 million of our outstanding 8 3/8% Senior Notes in the open market. The
aggregate purchase price was $20.6 million, or an average of 102.8% of the
aggregate principal amount of the notes repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid
interest as of the purchase date. The repurchase of the notes resulted in a
$562,500 pretax loss included in other (loss) income in the accompanying
Statement of Operations. On March 28, 2007, we repurchased an additional $10.0
million of our outstanding 8 5/8% Senior Notes which were cash settled on April
2, 2007 at a purchase price of $9.85 million. Senior Notes repurchased by the
Company were cancelled on the books of the Senior Notes’ trustee.
Junior
Subordinated Notes - On
June
15, 2006, we completed a private placement of $103.1 million of unsecured junior
subordinated notes which mature on July 30, 2036 and are redeemable at par
on or
after July 30, 2011 and pay a fixed rate of 7.987% for the first ten years
ending July 30, 2016. Thereafter, the securities have a floating interest rate
equal to three-month LIBOR plus 2.45% per annum, resetting quarterly. These
notes were issued to Beazer Capital Trust I, which simultaneously issued, in
a
private transaction, trust preferred securities and common securities with
an
aggregate value of $103.1 million to fund its purchase of these notes. The
transaction is treated as debt in accordance with GAAP. The obligations relating
to these notes and the related securities are subordinated to the Revolving
Credit Facility and the Senior Notes.
35
Other
Notes -
We
periodically acquire land through the issuance of notes payable. As of March
31,
2007 and September 30, 2006, we had outstanding notes payable of $118.3 million
and $89.3 million, respectively, primarily related to land acquisitions. These
notes payable expire at various times through 2010 and had fixed and variable
rates ranging from 6.75% to 11.00% at March 31, 2007. These notes are secured
by
the real estate to which they relate.
There
have been no material changes to our long-term debt and contractual obligations
as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September
30,
2006 other than those discussed above.
Stock
Repurchases and Dividends Paid -
On
November 18, 2005, as part of an acceleration of Beazer Homes’ comprehensive
plan to enhance stockholder value, our Board of Directors authorized an increase
in our stock repurchase plan to ten million shares of our common stock. Shares
may be purchased for cash in the open market, on the NYSE, or in privately
negotiated transactions. We did not repurchase any shares in the open market
during the six months ended March 31, 2007. During the six months ended March
31, 2006, we repurchased approximately 2.0 million shares for an aggregate
purchase price of $133.2 million or approximately $66 per share pursuant to
the
plan. At March 31, 2007, we are authorized to purchase approximately 5.4 million
additional shares pursuant to the plan.
For
the
six months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, we
paid
quarterly cash dividends of $0.10 per common share, or a total of approximately
$7.8 million in 2007 and $8.3 million in 2006.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
and Aggregate
Contractual Commitments - We
attempt to control half or more of our land supply through option contracts.
As
a result of the flexibility that these options provide us, upon a change in
market conditions we may renegotiate the terms of the options prior to exercise
or terminate the applicable agreements. Option contracts generally require
the
payment of cash or the posting of a letter of credit for the right to acquire
lots during a specified period of time at a certain price. Under option
contracts, both with and without specific performance provisions, purchase
of
the properties is contingent upon satisfaction of certain requirements by us
and
the sellers. Our obligation with respect to options with specific performance
provisions is included in our unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets
in
other payables and accrued liabilities. Under option contracts without specific
performance obligations, our liability is generally limited to forfeiture of
the
non-refundable deposits, letters of credit and other non-refundable amounts
incurred, which aggregated approximately $302.5 million at March 31, 2007.
This
amount includes non-refundable letters of credit of approximately $42.4 million.
The total remaining purchase price, net of cash deposits, committed under all
options was $2.1 billion as of March 31, 2007. $16.2 million of total remaining
purchase price under such options contains specific performance clauses which
may require us to purchase the land or lots upon the land seller meeting certain
obligations.
We
expect
to exercise all of our option contracts with specific performance obligations
and, subject to market conditions, substantially all of our option contracts
without specific performance obligations. Various factors, some of which are
beyond our control, such as market conditions, weather conditions and the timing
of the completion of development activities, can have a significant impact
on
the timing of option exercises. Under their current terms, and assuming no
significant changes in market conditions or other factors, we expect to exercise
the majority of our land options within three to four years.
36
We
have
historically funded the exercise of land options through a combination of
operating cash flows and borrowings under our credit facilities. We expect
these
sources to continue to be adequate to fund anticipated future option exercises.
Therefore, we do not anticipate that the exercise of our land options will
have
a material adverse effect on our liquidity.
Certain
of our option contracts are with sellers who are deemed to be Variable Interest
Entities (“VIE”s)
under FASB Interpretation No. 46R, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,
an Interpretation of ARB No. 51” (“FIN 46R”). We have determined that we are the
primary beneficiary of certain of these option contracts. Our risk is generally
limited to the option deposits that we pay, and creditors of the sellers
generally have no recourse to the general credit of the Company. Although we
do
not have legal title to the optioned land, for those option contracts for which
we are the primary beneficiary, we are required to consolidate the land under
option at fair value. We believe that the exercise prices of our option
contracts approximate their fair value. Our condensed consolidated balance
sheets at March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006 reflect consolidated inventory
not owned of $462.3 million and $471.4 million, respectively. We consolidated
$143.8 million and $146.6 million of lot option agreements as consolidated
inventory not owned pursuant to FIN 46R as of March 31, 2007 and September
30,
2006, respectively. In addition, as of March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006,
we
recorded $318.5 million and $324.8 million, respectively, of land under the
caption consolidated inventory not owned related to lot option agreements for
which our deposits and pre-acquisition development costs exceeded certain
thresholds. Obligations related to consolidated inventory not owned totaled
$335.6 million at March 31, 2007 and $330.7 million at September 30, 2006.
The
difference between the balances of consolidated inventory not owned and
obligations related to consolidated inventory not owned represents cash deposits
paid under the option agreements.
We
participate in a number of land development joint ventures in which we have
less
than a controlling interest. We enter into joint ventures in order to acquire
attractive land positions, to manage our risk profile and to leverage our
capital base. Our joint ventures are typically entered into with developers,
other homebuilders and financial partners to develop finished lots for sale
to
the joint venture’s members and other third parties. We account for our interest
in these joint ventures under the equity method. Our condensed consolidated
balance sheets include investments in joint ventures totaling $128.4 million
and
$122.8 million at March 31, 2007 and September 30, 2006,
respectively. During
the quarter ended March 31, 2007, we wrote down the investment in two of our
Virginia joint ventures reflecting impairments of inventory held within those
ventures. The related impairment charge of $7.1 million is recorded in equity
in
loss of unconsolidated joint ventures in the accompanying Statement of
Operations.
Our
joint
ventures typically obtain secured acquisition and development financing. At
March 31, 2007, our unconsolidated joint ventures had borrowings outstanding
totaling $788.8 million. In some instances, we and our joint venture partners
have provided varying levels of guarantees of debt of our unconsolidated joint
ventures. At March 31, 2007, we had a repayment guarantee of $13.0 million
and
limited maintenance guarantees of $6.3 million related to certain of our
unconsolidated joint ventures’ debt (see Note 4 to the unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding our
joint
ventures and related guarantees).
37
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
As
discussed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September
30, 2006, some
of
our critical accounting policies require the use of judgment in their
application or require estimates of inherently uncertain matters and relate
to
inventory valuation, goodwill, homebuilding revenues and costs and warranty
reserves. Although our accounting policies are in compliance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America, a change in
the
facts and circumstances of the underlying transactions could significantly
change the application of the accounting policies and the resulting financial
statement impact. There have been no material changes to our critical accounting
policies as discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year
ended September 30, 2006.
OUTLOOK:
The
current housing market environment continues to be characterized by lower demand
and higher inventories, with heavy discounting needed to drive meaningful sales
volume. Given current market conditions, and the low visibility as to when
conditions may improve, we are not comfortable at this time updating our
earnings per share outlook for fiscal 2007 and have withdrawn our
previously-issued outlook.
During
this period, we will focus on maintaining balance sheet strength, continuing
to
reduce costs, and maximizing our financial resources to better position the
Company to take advantage of those opportunities that will arise when conditions
stabilize. Steps taken to date to align our cost structure with the current
environment are consistent with our goal to be in the top quartile of our peer
group with respect to margins and returns.
Cautionary
Statement Pursuant to Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995:
This
quarterly
report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning
of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking
statements represent our expectations or beliefs concerning future events,
and
it is possible that the results described in this quarterly report will not
be
achieved. These forward-looking statements can generally be identified by the
use of statements that include words such as “estimate,” “project,” “believe,”
“expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “foresee,” “likely,” “will,” “goal,”
“target” or other similar words or phrases. All forward-looking statements are
based upon information available to us on the date of this quarterly report.
Except as may be required under applicable law, we do not undertake any
obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a
result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
These
forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other
factors, many of which are outside of our control, that could cause actual
results to differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking
statements, including, among other things, the matters discussed in this
quarterly report in the sections captioned “Outlook” and “Financial Condition
and Liquidity.” Additional information about factors that could lead to material
changes in performance is contained in Item 1A. Risk Factors of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2006 and Item 1A. Risk
Factors of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Such factors may include:
· |
economic
changes nationally or in local
markets;
|
· |
volatility
of mortgage interest rates and
inflation;
|
· |
increased
competition;
|
· |
shortages
of skilled labor or raw materials used in the production of
houses;
|
· |
increased
prices for labor, land and raw materials used in the production of
houses;
|
· |
increased
land development costs on projects under
development;
|
· |
decreased
land values underlying land option
agreements;
|
38
· |
the
cost and availability of insurance, including the availability of
insurance for the presence of mold;
|
· |
the
impact of construction defect and home warranty
claims;
|
· |
the
results of any litigation or government
proceedings;
|
· |
a
material failure on the part of Trinity Homes LLC to satisfy the
conditions of the class action settlement
agreement;
|
· |
any
delays in reacting to changing consumer preference in home
design;
|
· |
terrorist
acts and other acts of war;
|
· |
changes
in consumer confidence;
|
· |
changes
in levels of demand;
|
· |
delays
or difficulties in implementing initiatives to reduce production
and
overhead cost structure;
|
· |
delays
in land development or home construction resulting from adverse weather
conditions;
|
· |
potential
delays or increased costs in obtaining necessary permits as a result
of
changes to, or complying with, laws, regulations, or governmental
policies
and possible penalties for failure to comply with such laws, regulations
and governmental policies;
|
· |
the
outcome of the U.S. Attorney review and related internal review,
the class
action lawsuits, derivative claims and similar
proceedings
|
· |
changes
in accounting policies, standards, guidelines or principles, as may
be
adopted by regulatory agencies as well as the FASB;
or
|
· |
other
factors over which the Company has little or no
control.
|
Any
forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement
is
made, and, except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update
any
forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date
on
which such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated
events. New factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for
management to predict all such factors.
We
are
exposed to a number of market risks in the ordinary course of business. Our
primary market risk exposure relates to fluctuations in interest rates. We
do
not believe that our exposure in this area is material to cash flows or
earnings. As of March 31, 2007, we had $106.2 million of variable rate debt
outstanding. Based on our average outstanding borrowings under our variable
rate
debt at March 31, 2007, a one-percentage point increase in interest rates would
negatively impact our annual pre-tax earnings by approximately $1.1 million.
39
As
of the
end of the period covered by this report on Form 10-Q, management, including
our
Chief Executive Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation
of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon, and as of the date
of
that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer concluded that the disclosure
controls and procedures were effective, in all material respects, to ensure
that
information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under
the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when
required. Further our Chief Executive Officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures have been designed to ensure that information required
to be disclosed in reports filed by us under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934
(the “Exchange Act”), as amended, is accumulated and communicated to management
including the Chief Executive Officer, in a manner to allow timely decisions
regarding the required disclosure.
There
were no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting
(as
defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) identified
in
connection with the foregoing evaluation that occurred during the quarter ended
March 31, 2007, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
United
States Attorney Inquiry.
As
previously disclosed in our Form 8-K dated March 27, 2007, Beazer Homes and
its
subsidiary Beazer Mortgage Corporation received a subpoena from the United
States Attorney’s office in the Western District of North Carolina, upon
application of the Office of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Inspector
General, seeking the production of documents focusing on our mortgage
origination services. We are cooperating with the United States Attorney and
the
document production request. The Audit Committee of Beazer Homes’ Board of
Directors has initiated an internal review of Beazer Homes’ mortgage origination
business and related matters and has retained independent legal counsel and
an
independent financial consultant to assist with that review.
Securities
Class Action.
Beazer
Homes and certain of our current and former executive officers were named as
defendants in a putative class action securities lawsuit filed on March 29,
2007
in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.
Plaintiffs filed this action on behalf of a purported class of purchasers of
Beazer Homes’ common stock between July 27, 2006 and March 27, 2007. The
complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of
the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by issuing
materially false and misleading statements regarding our business and prospects
because we did not disclose facts related to alleged improper lending practices
in our mortgage origination business. Plaintiffs seek an unspecified amount
of
compensatory damages. At this time, we have found no evidence to support the
allegations and intend to vigorously defend the Company.
Derivative
Shareholder Action.
Certain
of Beazer Homes’ current and former executive officers and directors were named
as defendants in a derivative shareholder suit filed on April 16, 2007 in the
United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The complaint
also names Beazer Homes as a nominal defendant. The complaint, purportedly
on
behalf of Beazer Homes, alleges that the defendants 1) violated Sections 10(b)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder;
2)
breached their fiduciary duties and misappropriated information; 3) abused
their
control; 4) wasted corporate assets; and 5) were unjustly enriched. Plaintiffs
seek an unspecified amount of compensatory damages against the individual
defendants and in favor of Beazer Homes. At this time, Beazer Homes has found
no
evidence to support the allegations and the defendants intend to vigorously
defend against the claims.
40
Homeowners
Class Actions.
Beazer
Homes’ subsidiary, Beazer Homes Corp. and Beazer Mortgage Corporation, are
defendants in a putative class action lawsuit filed on March 23, 2007 in the
General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division, County of Mecklenberg, State
of North Carolina. The complaint was filed on behalf of a putative class defined
as North Carolina residents who purchased homes in subdivisions in North
Carolina containing homes constructed by the defendants where the foreclosure
rate is allegedly significantly higher than the state-wide average. The
complaint alleges that the defendants utilized unfair trade practices to allow
low income purchasers to qualify for loans they allegedly could not afford.
Plaintiffs seek an unspecified amount of compensatory damages and also request
that any damage award be trebled. At this time, we have found no evidence to
support the allegations and intend to vigorously defend this
action.
A
second
similar putative homeowner class action lawsuit was filed on April 23, 2007
in
the Federal District Court for the State of South Carolina, Columbia Division.
The complaint alleges that Beazer Homes Corp. and Beazer Mortgage Corporation
illegally financed the purchase of homes sold to low income purchasers, who
allegedly would not have otherwise qualified for the loans, and seeks an
unspecified amount of damages, including damages for alleged violations of
federal RICO statutes. At this time we have found no evidence to support the
allegations and intend to vigorously defend this action.
The
investigation by the United States Attorney’s office, the related internal
review by the Audit Committee and the class action lawsuits and the derivative
shareholder lawsuit described above are in their early stages. At this time,
management cannot predict the outcome of any such matters or the length of
time
it will take to resolve any of the above.
EPA
Information Request.
In
November 2003, Beazer
Homes
received
a request for information from the EPA pursuant to Section 308 of the Clean
Water Act seeking information concerning the nature and extent of storm water
discharge practices relating to certain of our projects completed or under
construction. The EPA has since requested information on additional projects
and
has conducted site inspections at a number of locations. In certain instances,
the EPA or the equivalent state agency has issued Administrative Orders
identifying alleged instances of noncompliance and requiring corrective action
to address the alleged deficiencies in storm water management practices. As
of
March
31,
2007,
no monetary penalties have been imposed in connection with such Administrative
Orders. The EPA has reserved the right to impose monetary penalties at a later
date, the amount of which, if any, cannot currently be estimated. Beazer
Homes
has
taken action to comply with the requirements of each of the Administrative
Orders and is working to otherwise maintain compliance with the requirements
of
the Clean Water Act.
In
June
2006, we received an Administrative Order issued by the New Jersey Department
of
Environmental Protection alleging certain violations of a wetlands disturbance
permit with respect to a project in New Jersey, and assessing a proposed fine
of
$630,000. We met with the Department to discuss their concerns and requested
a
hearing on the matter which has not yet been scheduled. We believe that we
have
significant defenses to the alleged violations and intend to contest the
agency’s findings and the proposed fine.
In
August
2006, we received an Administrative Order issued by the New Jersey Department
of
Environmental Protection alleging certain violations of a wetlands disturbance
permit with respect to a second project in New Jersey, and assessing a proposed
fine of $678,000. We met with the Department to discuss their concerns and
requested a hearing on the matter which has not yet been scheduled. We believe
that we have significant defenses to the alleged violations and intend to
contest the agency’s findings and the proposed fine.
We
and
certain of our subsidiaries have been named as defendants in various claims,
complaints and other legal actions, most relating to construction defects,
moisture intrusion and related mold claims and product liability. Certain of
the
liabilities resulting from these actions are covered in whole or part by
insurance. In our opinion, based on its current assessment, the ultimate
resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
41
The
information set forth below updates, and should be read in conjunction with,
the
risk factors previously disclosed in Item 1A of Part I of our annual report
on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006.
We
are the subject of an ongoing governmental investigation and certain pending
civil litigation which could require us to pay substantial fines, damages or
other penalties or otherwise have a material adverse effect on
us.
We
and
our subsidiary Beazer Mortgage Corporation are responding to a request for
documents from the United States Attorney’s office in the Western District of
North Carolina, we and certain of our current and former executive officers
are
defendants in a securities class action lawsuit, certain of our subsidiaries
have been named in class action lawsuits and certain of our current and former
employees, directors and officers have been named in a derivative shareholder
lawsuit. The investigation and the lawsuits are in the early stages and we
cannot predict the results that will be achieved or the effect that any adverse
findings in such investigation or lawsuits may have on us. While we are
cooperating with the investigation, developments, including the expansion of
the
scope of the investigation, could negatively impact us and could divert the
efforts and attention of our management team. Unfavorable results in connection
with the investigation could result in the payment of criminal or civil fines;
the imposition of an injunction on future conduct; or the imposition of other
penalties, any of which could have a material adverse effect on us. An
unfavorable determination in either of the lawsuits could result in the payment
by us of monetary damages which may not be fully covered by insurance. Further,
the defense of such lawsuits, even if we are ultimately successful, could have
a
material adverse effect on our financial results and on management’s attention
to the operation of our business.
None.
On
February 5, 2007, we held our annual meeting of stockholders, at which the
following matters were voted upon with the results indicated below. All
numbers reported are shares of Beazer Homes’ common stock.
1) |
The
stockholders elected seven members to the Board of Directors to serve
until the next annual meeting. The results of voting were as follows
(based on 39,158,028 outstanding shares entitled to vote at the
meeting):
|
Election
of Directors
Name
|
Votes
For
|
Votes
Against |
Votes
Abstained |
|||||||
Laurent
Alpert
|
36,575,267
|
342,831
|
43,552
|
|||||||
Katie
J. Bayne
|
35,251,514
|
1,670,150
|
39,988
|
|||||||
Brian
C. Beazer
|
36,419,972
|
506,252
|
35,426
|
|||||||
Peter
G. Leemputte
|
36,565,223
|
355,335
|
41,086
|
|||||||
Ian
J. McCarthy
|
36,429,803
|
507,781
|
24,066
|
|||||||
Larry
T. Solari
|
35,094,018
|
1,839,544
|
28,088
|
|||||||
Stephen
P. Zelnak, Jr.
|
35,345,139
|
1,574,902
|
41,610
|
2) |
To
consider and act upon a proposal to ratify the selection of Deloitte
&
Touche LLP by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors as independent
registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending September
30,
2007:
|
Votes
For
|
Votes
Against
|
Votes
Abstain
|
|||
36,380,057
|
563,503
|
18,087
|
42
(a) |
Exhibits:
|
31.1 |
Certification
pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14 promulgated under Section 302
of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
32.1 |
Certification
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
Beazer Homes USA, Inc. | |||
Date: April 26, 2007 |
By:
|
/s/
Ian J. McCarthy
|
|
Name:
|
Ian
J. McCarthy
|
||
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
Date:
April
26, 2007
|
By:
|
/s/
Michael T. Rand
|
|
Name:
|
Michael
T. Rand
|
||
Senior
Vice President and
|
|||
Chief
Accounting Officer
|
43