BEL FUSE INC /NJ - Annual Report: 2006 (Form 10-K)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
(Mark
One)
x ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For
the
fiscal year ended December
31,
2006________________________________________________________
or
o TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For
the
transition period from _______________________________to__________________________________
Commission
File Number: 0-11676________________________________________________________________
BEL
FUSE
INC.
NEW
JERSEY
|
22-1463699
|
|
(State
of other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
206
Van Vorst Street
|
Jersey
City, New Jersey
|
07302
|
||
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(201)
432-0463
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Class
A
Common Stock, $0.10 par value; Class B Common Stock, $0.10 par
value
Indicate
by checkmark if the registrant is a well-known issuer, as defined in Rule 405
of
the
Securities
Act. o Yes x
No
Indicate
by checkmark if the registrant is not required to file reports to Section 13
or
15(d)
of
the Act.
o Yes x
No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days. x
Yes o
No
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not
be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate
by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and
“large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
Large
accelerated filer o
Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o
Yes x
No
The
aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity of the
registrant held by non-affiliates (for this purpose, persons and entities other
than executive officers, directors, and 5% or more shareholders) of the
registrant, as of the last business day of the registrant's most recently
completed second fiscal quarter (June 30, 2006), was $312,206,369.
Number
of
shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 1, 2007: 2,702,677 Class A Common
Stock; 9,171,665- Class B Common Stock
Documents
incorporated by reference:
Bel
Fuse
Inc.'s Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
is
incorporated by reference into Part III.
BEL
FUSE INC.
|
|||
INDEX
|
|||
Forward
Looking Information
|
Page
|
||
Part
I
|
|||
Item
1.
|
Business
|
1
|
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
11
|
|
Item
1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
17
|
|
Item
2.
|
Properties
|
17
|
|
Item
3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
19
|
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
20
|
|
Part
II
|
|||
Item
5.
|
Market
for Registrant's Common Equity,
|
||
Related
Stockholder Matters and Issuer
|
|||
Purchases
of Equity Securities
|
21
|
||
Item
6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
23
|
|
Item
7.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial
|
||
Condition
and Results of Operations
|
25
|
||
Item
7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About
|
||
Market
Risk
|
45
|
||
|
|||
Item
8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
45
|
|
Item
9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements With Accountants
|
||
on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure
|
47
|
||
Item
9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
47
|
|
Item
9B.
|
Other
Information
|
49
|
|
Part
III
|
|||
Item
10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate
|
|
|
Governance
|
49
|
||
Item
11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
49
|
|
Item
12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
|
||
and
Management and Related Stockholder
|
|
||
Matters
|
49
|
BEL
FUSE INC.
|
|||
INDEX
(Con't)
|
|||
Forward
Looking Information
|
Page
|
||
Part
III (Con't)
|
Item
13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions,
|
||
and
Director Independence
|
49
|
||
Item
14.
|
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
|
49
|
|
Part
IV
|
|||
|
|||
Item
15.
|
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
|
50
|
|
|
|
||
Signatures |
53
|
||
|
|
|
|
*Page
F-1 follows page 46
|
FORWARD
LOOKING INFORMATION
The
Company’s quarterly and annual operating results are affected by a wide variety
of factors that could materially and adversely affect revenues and
profitability, including the risk factors described in Item 1A of the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K. As a result of these and other factors, the Company
may experience material fluctuations in future operating results on a quarterly
or annual basis, which could materially and adversely affect its business,
financial condition, operating results, and stock prices. Furthermore, this
document and other documents filed by the Company with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) contain certain forward-looking statements under
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“Forward-Looking
Statements”) with respect to the business of the Company. These Forward-Looking
Statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including those
mentioned above, and those detailed in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form
10-K, which could cause actual results to differ materially from these
Forward-Looking Statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly
release the results of any revisions to these Forward-Looking Statements which
may be necessary to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or
to
reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. An investment in the Company
involves various risks, including those mentioned above and those which are
detailed from time to time in the Company’s SEC filings.
PART
I
Item
1.
Business
General
Bel
Fuse
Inc. ("Bel" or the "Company") is a leading producer of electronic products
that
help make global connectivity a reality. The Company designs, manufactures
and
markets a broad array of magnetics, modules, circuit protection devices and
interconnect products. While these products are deployed primarily in the
computer, networking and telecommunication industries, Bel’s portfolio of
products also finds application in the automotive, medical and consumer
electronics markets. These products are designed to protect, regulate, connect,
isolate or manage a variety of electronic circuits.
With
over
55 years in the electronics industry, Bel has reliably demonstrated the ability
to succeed in a variety of product areas across multiple industries. Founded
in
1949, the Company has a strong track record of technical innovation working
with
the engineering communities of market leaders. Bel has consistently proven
itself a valuable supplier to the foremost companies in its chosen industries
by
developing cost-effective solutions for the challenges of new product
development. By combining our strength in product design with our own
specially-designed manufacturing facilities, Bel has established itself as
a
formidable competitor on a global basis.
1
The
Company, which is organized under New Jersey law, operates in one industry
with
three geographic reporting segments as defined in Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise
and
Related Information". Bel’s principal executive offices are located at 206 Van
Vorst Street, Jersey City, New Jersey 07302; (201) 432-0463. The Company
operates other facilities in North America, Europe and the Far East and trades
on the NASDAQ (BELFA and BELFB). For information regarding Bel's three
geographic reporting units, see Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
The
terms
“Company” and “Bel” as used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K refers to Bel
Fuse Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries unless otherwise
specified.
Product
Groups
Magnetics
§
|
Discrete
components
|
§
|
Power
transformers
|
§
|
MagJack®
integrated connector modules
|
The
Company, a leading producer of discrete magnetics, markets an extensive line
of
products (transformers, diplex filters, common mode chokes and delay lines)
used
in networking, telecommunications and broadband applications. These magnetic
devices condition, filter and isolate the signal as it travels through network
equipment helping to ensure accurate data and/or voice transmission. Bel’s
magnetic components are also used in the automotive and consumer products
markets.
Power
transformer products include standard and custom designs that have been added
to
the Company’s product mix as a result of the Company's Signal Transformer
acquisition in 2003. Manufactured for use in alarm, security and medical
products, these devices are designed to comply with international safety
standards governing transformers, including UL, CSA, IEC, TUV and VDE.
Marketed
under the brand MagJack®, Bel's connectors with integrated magnetics provide the
signal conditioning, electromagnetic interference suppression and signal
isolation previously performed by multiple, discrete magnetics.
Modules
§
|
Power
conversion modules
|
§
|
Integrated
analog front end modules
|
§
|
Custom
modules
|
Bel’s
Power conversion products include standard and custom non-isolated DC-DC
converters designed specifically to power low voltage silicon devices. The
need
for converting one DC voltage to another voltage is growing rapidly as the
developers of integrated circuits commonly adjust the supply voltage as a means
of optimizing device performance. These DC-DC converters are used in data
networking equipment, distributed power architecture, and telecommunication
devices, as well as computers and peripherals.
2
The
Company develops IC-compatible, integrated front end modules for
broadband and telecommunication applications. These modules
can
eliminate the need for several discrete components by providing the same
functionality in a single, compact device.
The
Company continues to pursue market opportunities, where it can supply customized
value-added modules to customers requiring integrated products that combine
one
or more of the Company's capabilities in surface mount assembly, automatic
winding, hybrid fabrication and component encapsulation.
Circuit
Protection
§
|
Miniature
fuses
|
§
|
Micro
fuses
|
§
|
Surface
mount fuses and PTC devices
|
§
|
Radial
PTC
|
The
Company’s circuit protection products include board level fuse and PTC devices
(miniature, micro and surface mount fuses) designed for the global electronic
and telecommunication markets. Fuses and PTC devices prevent currents in an
electrical circuit from exceeding certain predetermined levels, acting as a
safety valve to protect expensive components from damage by cutting off high
currents before they can generate enough heat to cause smoke or fire.
Additionally, PTC devices are resettable and do not have to be replaced before
normal operation of the end product can resume.
While
the
Company continues to manufacture traditional fuse types, its surface mount
chip
fuses are used in space-critical applications such as mobile phones and
computers. Like the majority of Bel’s fuse products, the chip fuses comply with
RoHS standards for the elimination of lead and other hazardous materials.
The
Company’s circuit protection devices are used extensively in products such as
televisions, consumer electronics, power supplies, computers, telephones and
networking equipment.
Interconnect
§
|
Passive
jacks
|
§
|
Plugs
|
§
|
Cable
assemblies
|
The
Company
has a
comprehensive line of modular connectors, including RJ45 and RJ11 passive jacks,
plugs and cable assemblies. Passive jacks serve primarily as the connectivity
device in networking equipment such as routers, hubs, switches and patch panels.
Modular plugs and cable assemblies are utilized within the structured cabling
system, often referred to as premise wiring. The Company’s connector products
are designed to meet all major performance standards including Category 6
compliant products targeted to next generation network standards for Gigabit
Ethernet and 10Gigabit Ethernet.
3
The
following table describes, for each of Bel's product groups, the principal
functions and applications associated with such product groups.
Product
Group
|
Function
|
Application
|
|
Magnetics
|
|||
Discrete
Components
|
Condition,
filter and isolate the electronic signal to ensure accurate data
and/or
voice transmission.
|
Network
switches, routers, hubs and PCs used in 10/100Base-TX, Gigabit, Voice
over
the Internet Protocol (”VoIP"), home networking and cable modem
applications.
|
|
Power
Transformers
|
Safety
isolation and distribution.
|
Power
supplies, alarm, fire detection and security systems, HVAC, lighting
and
medical equipment.
|
|
MagJack®
Integrated Connector Modules
|
Condition,
filter and isolate an electronic signal to ensure accurate data and/or
voice transmission and to provide RJ45 and USB
connectivity
|
Network
switches, routers, hubs and PCs used in 10/100Base-TX, Gigabit, and
VoIP.
|
|
Modules
|
|||
Power
Conversion Modules
(DC-DC
Converters)
|
Convert
DC voltage level to other DC level as required to meet the power
needs of
low voltage silicon devices
|
Networking
equipment, distributed power architecture, telecom devices, computers
and
peripherals.
|
|
Integrated
Analog Front End Modules
|
Condition,
filter and isolate the electronic signal to ensure accurate data
and/or
voice transmission.
|
Broadband
and telecom equipment supporting ISDN, T1/E1, xDSL technologies.
|
|
Custom
Modules
|
Integrate
several discrete devices to provide customized, space-saving
solution.
|
Networking
products.
|
|
Circuit
Protection
|
|||
Miniature
Fuses
|
Protects
devices by preventing current in an electrical circuit from exceeding
acceptable levels.
|
Power
supplies, electronic ballasts and consumer electronics.
|
|
Micro
Fuses and Radial PTC
|
Protects
devices by preventing current in an electrical circuit from exceeding
acceptable levels.
|
Cellular
phone chargers, consumer electronics, power supplies and set top
boxes.
|
|
Surface
Mount Fuses and PTC
|
Protects
devices by preventing current in an electrical circuit from exceeding
acceptable levels.
|
Cellular
phones, mobile computers, IC and battery protection, power supplies
and
telecom line cards.
|
|
Interconnect
|
|||
Passive
Jacks
|
RJ45
and RJ11 connectivity for
data
and/or voice transmission.
|
Network
routers, hubs, switches and patch panels deployed in Category 5,
5e and 6
cable systems.
|
|
Plugs
|
RJ45
and RJ11 connectivity for
data
and/or voice transmission.
|
Network
routers, hubs, switches and patch panels deployed in Category 5,
5e and 6
cable systems.
|
|
Cable
Assemblies
|
RJ45
and RJ11 connectivity for
data
and voice transmission.
|
Structured
Category 5, 5e and 6 cabling systems (premise
wiring).
|
4
Acquisitions
Acquisitions
have played a critical role in the growth of Bel and the expansion of both
its
product portfolio and its customer base. Furthermore, acquisitions continue
to
be a key element in the Company’s growth strategy. As part of the Company’s
acquisition strategy, it may,
from
time to time, purchase equity positions in companies that are potential merger
candidates. The Company frequently evaluates possible merger candidates that
would provide an expanded product and technology base that will allow the
Company to further penetrate its strategic customers and/or an opportunity
to
reduce overall operating expense as a percentage of revenue. Bel also looks
at
whether the merger candidates are positioned to take advantage of the Company's
low cost manufacturing facilities; and whether a cultural fit will allow the
acquired company to be integrated smoothly and efficiently.
On
June
30, 2005, the Company acquired the common stock of Netwatch s.r.o., located
in
Prague, The Czech Republic, for approximately $1.9 million of which $0.5 million
was due to the sellers and was paid by the Company during June 2006. Netwatch
s.r.o. is a designer and manufacturer of high-performance fiber optic and copper
cable assemblies for data and telecommunication applications. Approximately
$1.0
million of goodwill arose from the transaction which is included in the
Company’s European reporting unit.
The
Company believes that the strategic value of the Netwatch s.r.o. acquisition
was
the establishment of a European manufacturing presence for the Company and
the
addition of fiber optic capability to the Bel Stewart Connector Group to
complement the Company’s existing copper-based product portfolio. The Company
believes that this acquisition enabled Bel Stewart to support the Company's
customer base, including the world's largest structured cabling providers,
with
a broad range of both copper and fiber based components and
assemblies.
This
acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and
accordingly, the results of operations of Netwatch s.r.o. have been included
in
the Company’s financial statements from June 30, 2005.
There
was
no in process research and development acquired as part of this
acquisition.
On
March
22, 2005, the Company acquired the common stock of Galaxy Power Inc. (“Galaxy”)
for approximately $19.0 million in cash including transaction costs of
approximately $0.4 million. The purchase price has been allocated to both
tangible and intangible assets and liabilities based on estimated fair values
after considering an independent formal appraisal. Approximately $11.5 million
of goodwill and $2.6 million of identifiable intangible assets arose from the
transaction and are included in the Company’s North American reporting unit. The
identifiable intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis
over
their estimated useful lives.
5
The
Company believes that the purchase of Galaxy’s Power Group was a logical
strategic fit with Bel’s Power Products group. The Company believes that the
products are highly complementary with minimal overlap. The customer base is
similar but still affords ample opportunity for cross selling. While Bel offers
Galaxy a much-needed cost competitive manufacturing base in China, Galaxy brings
a portfolio of products and technologies aimed at higher end markets. In
addition to these strategic synergies, there is significant opportunity for
expense reduction and the elimination of redundancies.
This
acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and
accordingly, the results of operations of Galaxy have been included in the
Company’s financial statements from March 22, 2005.
There
was
no in process research and development acquired as part of this
acquisition.
The
following unaudited pro forma summary results of operations assume that Galaxy
and Netwatch s.r.o. had been acquired as of January 1, 2004 (in thousands,
except per share data):
Year
Ended
|
|||||||
December
31,
|
|||||||
2005
|
2004
|
||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
221,227
|
$
|
212,331
|
|||
Net
earnings
|
20,026
|
25,419
|
|||||
Earnings
per share - diluted
|
|||||||
Class
A
|
1.65
|
2.14
|
|||||
Class
B
|
1.75
|
2.23
|
The
information above is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations
that would have occurred if the acquisitions had been consummated as of January
1, 2004.
Such
information should not be construed as a representation of the future results
of
operations of the Company.
6
A
condensed balance sheet of the major assets and liabilities of Galaxy and
Netwatch s.r.o. at the acquisition dates is as follows:
Cash
|
$
311,856
|
|||
Accounts
receivable
|
3,687,331
|
|||
Inventories
|
2,862,571
|
|||
Prepaid
expenses
|
96,120
|
|||
Income
taxes receivable
|
5,488
|
|||
Property,
plant and
|
||||
equipment
|
1,545,526
|
|||
Other
assets
|
32,083
|
|||
Deferred
tax asset
|
1,392,850
|
|||
Goodwill
|
11,786,080
|
|||
Intangible
assets
|
2,630,000
|
|||
Notes
payable
|
(860,694
|
)
|
||
Accounts
payable
|
(2,129,165
|
)
|
||
Accrued
expenses
|
(465,002
|
)
|
||
Net
assets acquired
|
$
|
20,895,044
|
The
Company has cumulatively acquired a total of 5,874,919 shares, or approximately
6%
of the
outstanding shares,
of the
common stock of Toko, Inc. (“Toko”) at a total purchase price of $18.0 million.
Toko had a market capitalization of approximately $255 million as of December
31, 2006. These shares are reflected on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet
as marketable securities. These marketable securities are considered to be
available for sale under SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in
Debt and Equity Securities”. Thus, as of December 31, 2006, the Company has
recorded an unrealized loss, net of income tax benefit, of approximately $1.5
million which is included in accumulated other comprehensive income as stated
in
the consolidated statement of stockholders’ equity. The Company’s investment in
Toko has been in an unrealized loss position for less than twelve months. As
a
result of the volatility of the Toko share price over the last year, management
believes that the investment in Toko is not other-than-temporarily impaired.
Furthermore, at March 14, 2007 the unrealized loss, net of income tax benefit,
was approximately $.6 million. In connection with this transaction, the Company
is obligated to pay an investment banker’s advisory fee to a third party of 20%
of the appreciation in the stock of Toko, or $1 million, whichever is lower.
During 2006 $300,000 was prepaid against this obligation. As of December 31,
2006, the Company has not accrued any additional fees to the investment banker
as the Toko stock is at an unrealized loss position.
The
Company acquired a total of 2,037,500 shares of the common stock of Artesyn
Technologies, Inc. (“Artesyn”) at a total purchase price of $16,331,469. On
April 28, 2006, Artesyn was acquired by Emerson Network Power for $11.00 per
share in cash. During the second quarter of 2006, in connection with the
Company's sale of its Artesyn common stock, the Company recognized a gain of
approximately $5.2 million, net of investment banker’s advisory fees of
$850,000. The Company accrued bonuses of $1.0 million in connection with the
gain. For financial statement presentation purposes, the $1.0 million bonus
was
classified within selling, general and administrative expenses ($723,000) and
cost of sales ($277,000) and was paid to key employees during January 2007.
7
Sales
and
Marketing
The
Company sells its products to customers throughout North America, Western Europe
and the Far East. Sales are made through one of three channels: direct strategic
account managers, regional sales managers working with independent sales
representative organizations or authorized distributors. Bel's strategic account
managers are assigned to handle major accounts requiring global coordination.
Independent
sales representatives and authorized distributors are overseen by the Company's
sales management personnel located throughout the world. As of December 31,
2006, the Company had a sales and support staff of 50 persons that supported
a
network of 82 sales representative organizations and non-exclusive distributors.
The Company has written agreements with all of its sales representative
organizations
and
major distributors. These written agreements, terminable on short notice by
either party, are standard in the industry.
Sales
support functions have also been established and located in Bel international
facilities to provide timely, efficient support for customers. This supplemental
level of service, in addition to first-line sales support, enables the Company
to be more responsive to customers’
needs on
a global level. The Company’s marketing capabilities include product management
which drives new product development, application engineering for technical
support and marketing communications. Product marketing managers facilitate
technical partnerships for engineering development of IC-compatible components
and modules.
8
Research
and Development
The
Company’s engineering groups are strategically located around the world to
facilitate communication with and access to customers’ engineering personnel.
This collaborative approach enables partnerships with customers for technical
development efforts. On occasion, Bel executes non-disclosure agreements with
customers to help develop proprietary, next generation products destined for
rapid deployment.
The
Company also sponsors membership in technical organizations that allow Bel’s
engineers to participate in developing standards for emerging technologies.
It
is management’s opinion that this participation is critical in establishing
credibility and a reputable level of expertise in the marketplace, as well
as
positioning the Company as an industry leader in new product
development.
Research
and development costs are expensed as incurred, and are included in cost of
sales. Generally, research and development is performed internally for the
benefit of the Company. Research and development costs include salaries,
building maintenance and utilities, rents, materials, administration costs
and
miscellaneous other items. Research and development expenses for the years
ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 amounted to $6.6 million, $7.3 million and
$7.3
million, respectively. The decrease from 2005 to 2006 is principally attributed
to less research and development costs in the United States due to the
consolidation of the Bel Power and Galaxy facilities in Massachusetts. This
was
offset in part by increased expenses at the Company’s China research and
development facility which has a lower cost structure.
Competition
The
Company operates in a variety of markets all of which are highly competitive.
There are numerous independent companies and divisions of major companies that
manufacture products that are competitive with one or more of Bel’s products. It
is management’s opinion that Bel’s expanded product portfolio helps to
differentiate the Company in these markets and, as a result, reduces the
possibility of any single direct competitor operating across all product groups.
The
Company's ability to compete is dependent upon several factors including product
performance, quality, reliability, depth of product line, customer service,
technological innovation, design, delivery time and price. Overall financial
stability and global presence also play a significant role and give Bel a
favorable position in relation to many of its competitors. Management intends
to
maintain a strong competitive posture in the Company's markets by continued
expansion of the Company’s product lines and ongoing investment in research,
development and manufacturing resources.
9
Associates
As
of
December 31, 2006, the Company had 1,956 full-time associates. The Company
employed 616 people at its North American facilities, 1,270 people at its Asian
facilities and 70 people at its European facilities, excluding workers supplied
by independent contractors. The Company's manufacturing facility in New York
is
represented by a labor union. The Company believes that its relations with
its
associates are satisfactory.
Suppliers
The
Company has multiple suppliers for most of the raw materials that it purchases.
Where possible, the Company has contractual agreements with suppliers to assure
a continuing supply of critical components.
With
respect to those items which are purchased from single sources, the Company
believes that comparable items would be available in the event that there was
a
termination of the Company's existing business relationships with any such
supplier. While such a termination could produce a disruption in production,
the
Company believes that the termination of business with any one of its suppliers
would not have a material adverse effect on its long-term operations. Actual
experience could differ materially from this belief as a result of a number
of
factors, including the time required to locate an alternative supplier, and
the
nature of the demand for the Company’s products. In the past, the Company has
experienced shortages in certain raw materials, such as capacitors, ferrites
and
integrated circuits (“IC’s”), when these materials were in great demand. Even
though the Company may have more than one supplier for certain materials, it
is
possible that these materials may not be available to the Company in sufficient
quantities or at the times desired by the Company.
Backlog
The
Company typically manufactures products against firm orders and projected usage
by customers. Cancellation and return arrangements are either negotiated by
the
Company on a transactional basis or contractually determined. The Company's
backlog of orders as of February 28, 2007 was approximately $47.1 million,
as
compared with a backlog of $50.1 million as of February 28, 2006. Management
expects that all of the Company's backlog as of February 28, 2007 will be
shipped by December 31, 2007. Such expectation constitutes a Forward-Looking
Statement. Factors that could cause the Company to fail to ship all such orders
by year-end include unanticipated supply difficulties, changes in customer
demand and new customer designs. The Company's major customers have negotiated
reduced lead times on purchase orders with the goal of reducing their
inventories. Accordingly, backlog may not
be a
reliable indicator of the timing of future sales. See Item 1A of this Annual
Report- "Risk Factors - Our backlog figures may not be reliable indicators."
10
Intellectual
Property
The
Company has been granted a number of U.S. patents and has additional U.S. patent
applications pending relating to its products. While the Company believes that
the issued patents are defendable and that the pending patent applications
relate to patentable inventions, there can be no assurance that a patent will
be
obtained from the applications or that its existing patents can be successfully
defended. It is management's opinion that the successful continuation and
operation of the Company's business does not depend upon the ownership of
patents or the granting of pending patent applications, but upon the innovative
skills, technical competence and marketing and managerial abilities of its
personnel. The patents have a life of seventeen years from the date of issue
or
twenty years from filing of patent applications. The Company's existing patents
expire on various dates from August 25, 2009 to February 15, 2021.
The
Company utilizes U.S. registered trademarks to identify various products that
it
manufactures. The trademarks survive as long as they are in use and the
registrations of these trademarks are renewed.
Available
Information
The
Company maintains a website at www.belfuse.com
where it
makes available the proxy statements, press releases and reports on Form 4,
8-K,
10-K and 10-Q that it and its insiders file with the SEC. These forms are made
available as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is
electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. Press releases are also
issued via electronic transmission to provide access to the Company’s financial
and product news. In addition, the Company provides notification of and access
to voice and Internet broadcasts of its quarterly and annual results.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
An
investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Investors should
carefully consider the risks described below, together with all other
information contained in this Annual Report before making investment decisions
with respect to our common stock.
We
do business in a highly competitive industry
Our
business is highly competitive worldwide, with relatively low barriers to
competitive entry. We compete principally on the basis of product performance,
quality, reliability, depth of product line, customer service, technological
innovation, design, delivery time and price. The electronic components industry
has become increasingly concentrated and globalized in recent years and our
major competitors, some of which are larger than us, have significant financial
resources and technological capabilities.
11
Our
backlog figures may not be reliable indicators.
Many
of
the orders that comprise our backlog may be canceled by customers without
penalty. Customers may on occasion double and triple order components from
multiple sources to ensure timely delivery when backlog is particularly long.
Customers often cancel orders when business is weak and inventories are
excessive. Therefore, we cannot be certain that the amount of our backlog equals
or exceeds the level of orders that will ultimately be delivered. Our results
of
operations could be adversely impacted if customers cancel a material portion
of
orders in our backlog.
There
are several factors which can cause us to lower our
prices.
a) The
average selling prices for our products tend to decrease rapidly over their
life
cycle, and customers are increasing pressure on suppliers to lower prices.
Our
profits will suffer if we are not able to reduce our costs of production or
induce technological innovations as sales prices decline.
b) Any
drop
in demand or increase in supply of our products due to the overcapacity of
our
competitors could cause a dramatic drop in our average sales prices causing
a
decrease in our gross margins.
c)Increased
competition from low cost suppliers around the world has put further pressures
on pricing. We
continually strive
to lower
our
costs,
negotiate better pricing for components and raw materials and improve our
operating efficiencies. Profit margins will be materially and adversely impacted
if we are not able to reduce our costs of production or introduce technological
innovations as sales prices decline.
We
are dependent on our ability to develop new products.
Our
future operating results are dependent, in part, on our ability to develop,
produce and market new and more technologically advanced products. There are
numerous risks inherent in this process, including the risks that we will be
unable to anticipate the direction of technological change or that we will
be
unable to timely develop and bring to market new products and applications
to
meet customers’ changing needs.
Our
acquisitions may not produce the anticipated results.
A
significant portion of our recent growth is from acquisitions. We cannot assure
you that we will identify or successfully complete transactions with suitable
acquisition candidates in the future. We also cannot assure you that
acquisitions we complete will be successful. If an acquired business fails
to
operate as anticipated or cannot be successfully integrated with our other
businesses, our results of operations, enterprise value, market value and
prospects could all be materially and adversely affected.
12
If
our
acquisitions fail to perform up to our expectations, or as the value of goodwill
decreases, we could be required to record a loss from the impairment of assets.
Integration of new acquisitions into our consolidated operations may result
in
lower average operating results for the group as a whole.
Our
strategy also focuses on the reduction of selling, general and administrative
expenses through the integration or elimination of redundant sales offices
and
administrative functions at acquired companies. Our inability to achieve these
goals could have a material and adverse effect on our results of
operations.
We
intend
to continue to seek additional acquisition candidates, although we cannot
predict when or if we will make any additional acquisitions, and what the impact
of any such acquisitions may have on our financial performance. If we were
to
undertake a substantial acquisition for cash, the acquisition would likely
need
to be financed in part through bank borrowings or the issuance of public or
private debt or equity. If we borrow money to finance acquisitions, this would
likely decrease our ratio of earnings to fixed charges and adversely affect
other leverage criteria and could result in the imposition of material
restrictive covenants. Under our existing credit facility, we are required
to
obtain our lenders’ consent for certain additional debt financing, to comply
with other covenants including the application of specific financial ratios,
and
may be restricted from paying cash dividends on our capital stock. We cannot
assure you that the necessary acquisition financing would be available to us
on
acceptable terms, or at all, when required. If we issue a substantial amount
of
stock either as consideration in an acquisition or to finance an acquisition,
such issuance may dilute existing stockholders and may take the form of capital
stock having preferences over our existing common stock.
We
are exposed to weaknesses in international markets and other risks inherent
in
foreign trade.
We
have
operations in eight countries around the world outside the United States, and
approximately 73 % of our revenues during 2006 were derived from sales to
customers outside the United States. Some of the countries in which we operate
have in the past experienced and may continue to experience political, economic,
medical epidemic and military instability or unrest. These conditions could
have
a material and adverse impact on our ability to operate in these regions and,
depending on the extent and severity of these conditions, could materially
and
adversely affect our overall financial condition and operating results.
Although
our operations have traditionally been largely transacted in U.S. dollars or
U.S. dollar linked currencies, recent world financial instability may cause
additional foreign currency risks in the countries we operate in.
Other
risks inherent in doing trade internationally include: expropriation and
nationalization, trade restrictions, transportation delays, and changes in
United States laws that may inhibit or restrict our ability to manufacture
in or
sell to any particular country. For information regarding risks associated
with
our presence in Hong Kong and Macao, see "Item 2 - Properties" of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
13
While
we
have benefited from favorable tax treatment in many of the countries where
we
operate, the benefits we currently enjoy could change if laws or rules in the
United States or those foreign jurisdictions change, incentives are changed
or
revoked, or we are unable to renew current incentives.
We
may experience labor unrest.
As
we
implement transfers of certain of our operations, we may experience strikes
or
other types of labor unrest as a result of lay-offs or termination of employees
in higher labor cost countries.
Our
manufacturing facility in New York is represented by a labor union.
Our
results of operations may be materially and adversely impacted by environmental
and other regulations.
Our
manufacturing operations, products and/or product packaging are subject to
environmental laws and regulations governing air emissions, wastewater
discharges, the handling, disposal and remediation of hazardous substances,
wastes and certain chemicals used or generated in our manufacturing processes,
employee health and safety labeling or other notifications with respect to
the
content or other aspects of our processes, products or packaging, restrictions
on the use of certain materials in or on design aspects of our products or
product packaging and responsibility for disposal of products or product
packaging. More stringent environmental regulations may be enacted in the
future, and we cannot presently determine the modifications, if any, in our
operations that any such future regulations might require, or the cost of
compliance with these regulations.
Our
results may vary substantially from period to period.
Our
revenues and expenses may vary significantly from one accounting period to
another accounting period due to a variety of factors, including customers'
buying decisions, our product mix and general market and economic conditions.
Such variations could significantly impact our stock price.
14
A
shortage of availability or an increase in the cost of raw materials and
components and our ability to procure high quality raw materials at cost
effective prices may negatively impact profit
margins.
Our
results of operations may be adversely impacted by difficulties in obtaining
raw
materials, supplies, power, natural resources and any other items needed for
the
production of our products, as well as by the effects of quality deviations
in
raw
materials and the effects of significant fluctuations in the prices on existing
inventories and purchase commitments for these
materials. Many of these materials and components are produced by a limited
number of suppliers and may be constrained by supplier capacity.
As
product life cycles shorten and during periods of market slowdowns, the risk
of
materials obsolescence
increases and this may materially
and
adversely impact our financial results.
Rapid
shifts in demand for various products may cause some of our inventory of raw
materials, components or finished goods to become obsolete.
The
life
cycles and demand for our products are directly linked to the life cycles and
demand for the end products into which they are designed. Rapid shifts in the
life cycles or demand for these end products due to technological shifts,
economic conditions or other market trends may result in material amounts of
inventory of either raw materials or finished goods becoming obsolete. While
the
Company works diligently to manage inventory levels, rapid shifts in demand
may
result in obsolete or excess inventory and materially
impact
financial results.
15
A
loss of the services of the Company’s executive officers or other skilled
associates could negatively impact our operations and
results.
The
success of the Company’s operations is largely dependent upon the performance of
its executive officers, managers, engineers and sales people. Many of these
individuals have a significant number of years of experience within the Company
and/or the industry in which we compete and would be extremely difficult to
replace. The loss of the services of any of these associates may materially
and
adversely impact our results of operations if we are unable to replace them
in a
timely manner.
Our
stock price, like that of many technology companies, has been and may continue
to be volatile.
The
market price of our common stock may fluctuate as a result of variations in
our
quarterly operating results and other factors beyond our control. These
fluctuations may be exaggerated if the trading volume of our common stock is
low. In addition, the market price of our common stock may rise and fall in
response to a variety of factors, including:
·
|
announcements
of technological or competitive
developments;
|
·
|
acquisitions
or strategic alliances by us or our
competitors;
|
·
|
the
gain or loss of a significant customer or
order;
|
·
|
changes
in estimates of our financial performance or changes in recommendations
by
securities analysts regarding us or our industry;
or
|
·
|
general
market or economic conditions.
|
In
addition, equity securities of many technology companies have experienced
significant price and volume fluctuations. These price and volume fluctuations
often have been unrelated to the operating performance of the affected
companies.
Our
intellectual property rights may not be adequately protected under the current
state of the law.
We
cannot
assure you we will be successful in protecting our intellectual property through
patent or other laws. As a result, other companies may be able to develop and
market similar products which could materially and adversely
affect our business.
We
may be
sued by third parties for alleged infringement of their proprietary rights
and
we may incur defense costs and possibly royalty obligations or lose the right
to
use technology important to our business.
From
time
to time, we receive claims by third parties asserting that our products violate
their intellectual property rights. Any intellectual property claims, with
or
without merit, could be time consuming and expensive to litigate or settle
and
could divert management attention from administering our business. A third
party
asserting infringement claims against us or our customers with respect to our
current or future products may materially and
adversely affect us by, for example, causing us to enter into costly royalty
arrangements or forcing us to incur settlement or litigation
costs.
16
Item
1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
Not
applicable.
Item
2. Properties
The
Company is headquartered in Jersey City, New Jersey where it currently owns
53,000 square feet of office and warehouse space. On July 15, 2004 the Company
entered into an agreement for the sale of land and building of approximately
40,000 square feet located in Jersey City, New Jersey. The sales agreement
expired during January 2006. The
buyer
and seller are continuing to negotiate about certain environmental matters
among
themselves and with the State of New Jersey. See
Item
7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding this
agreement.
The
Company operated 13 manufacturing facilities in 7 countries as of December
31,
2006. An additional 117,000 square foot manufacturing facility has been
constructed in the PRC to meet customer demand. This manufacturing facility
was
completed during November 2006 and was operational by December 31, 2006.
The
following is a list of the locations of the Company's principal manufacturing
facilities at December 31, 2006.
Location
|
Approximate
Square
Feet
|
Owned/
Leased
|
Percentage
Used
for
Manufacturing
|
|||||||
Donnguan,
People's
|
||||||||||
Republic
of China
|
346,000
|
Leased
|
61
|
%
|
||||||
Zhongshan,
People's
|
||||||||||
Republic
of China
|
416,000
|
Leased
|
81
|
%
|
||||||
Zhongshan,
People's
|
||||||||||
Republic
of China
|
128,000
|
Leased
|
74
|
%
|
||||||
Zhongshan,
People's
|
||||||||||
Republic
of China
|
117,000
|
Owned
|
83
|
%
|
||||||
Zhongshan,
People's
|
||||||||||
Republic
of China
|
77,000
|
Owned
|
81
|
%
|
||||||
Hong
Kong
|
66,000
|
Owned
|
29
|
%
|
||||||
Macao
|
71,000
|
Owned
|
28
|
%
|
||||||
Louny,
Czech Republic
|
15,000
|
Leased
|
76
|
%
|
||||||
Dominican
Republic
|
41,000
|
Leased
|
85
|
%
|
||||||
Cananea,
Mexico
|
28,000
|
Leased
|
65
|
%
|
||||||
Inwood,
New York
|
35,000
|
Owned
|
60
|
%
|
||||||
Glen
Rock, Pennsylvania
|
74,000
|
Owned
|
60
|
%
|
||||||
Westboro,
MA
|
22,000
|
Leased
|
85
|
%
|
||||||
1,436,000
|
17
Of
this
manufacturing space, 95,000 square feet of space is used for engineering,
warehousing, sales and administrative support functions at various locations
and
265,000 square feet of space is used for dormitories, canteen and other employee
related facilities in the PRC and the Special Administrative Regions of Hong
Kong and Macao in Asia.
The
Territory of Hong Kong became a Special Administrative Region (“SAR”) of The
People's Republic of China during 1997. The territory of Macao became a SAR
of
The People's Republic of China at the end of 1999. Management cannot presently
predict what future impact, if any, this will have on the Company or how the
political climate in China and the Dominican Republic will affect its
contractual arrangements in China or labor relationships in the Dominican
Republic. A significant portion of the Company's manufacturing operations and
approximately 45% of its identifiable assets are located in Hong Kong, Macao,
and The People's Republic of China. Accordingly, events resulting from any
change in the "Most Favored Nation" status granted to China by the U.S. could
have a material
and
adverse
effect on the Company.
Approximately
33% of the 1.5 million square feet the Company occupies is owned while the
remainder is leased. See Note 15 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information pertaining to leases.
18
Item
3. Legal
Proceedings
The
Company and two of its officers are defendants in a wrongful termination lawsuit
brought in the District Court of Frankfurt am Main, Germany by a former employee
at a foreign subsidiary of the Company. The Company believes it has adequately
accrued sufficient amounts for this liability in accordance with the terms
of
the ex-employee's employment agreement.
The
Company is a plaintiff in a lawsuit captioned Bel Fuse Inc., a New Jersey
corporation, and Bel Power, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation, v. Andrew
Ferencz, Gregory Zovonar, Bernhard Schroter, EE2GO, Inc., a Massachusetts
corporation, Howard E. Kaepplein and William Ng, brought in the Superior Court
of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The Company was granted injunctive relief
and is seeking damages against the former stockholders of Galaxy Power, Inc.,
key employees of Galaxy and a corporation formed by some or all of the
individual defendants. The Company has alleged that the defendants violated
their written non-competition, non-disclosure and non-solicitation agreements,
diverted business and usurped substantial business opportunities with key
customers, misappropriated confidential information and trade secrets, and
harmed the Company’s business.
In
a
related matter, the Company is a defendant in a lawsuit captioned Robert
Chimielnski, P.C. on behalf of the stockholder representatives and the former
stockholders of Galaxy Power, Inc. v. Bel Fuse Inc. et al. brought in the
Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This complaint for damages
and injunctive relief is based on an alleged breach of contract and other
allegedly illegal acts in a corporate context arising out of the Company’s
objection to the release of nearly $2.0 million held in escrow under the terms
of the stock purchase agreement between Galaxy and the Company. The Company
believes it has adequate defenses regarding this lawsuit and accordingly has
not
accrued any liability in connection with such lawsuit.
The
Company is a defendant in a lawsuit captioned Murata Manufacturing Company,
Ltd.
v. Bel Fuse Inc. et al, brought in Illinois Federal District Court. Plaintiff
claims that its patent covers all of the Company's modular jack products. That
party had previously advised the Company that it was willing to grant a
non-exclusive license to the Company under the patent for a 3% royalty on all
future gross sales of ICM products; payment of a lump sum of 3% of past sales
including sales of applicable Insilco products; an annual minimum royalty of
$500,000; payment of all attorney fees; and marking of all licensed ICM's with
the third party's patent number. The Company is also a defendant in a lawsuit,
captioned Regal Electronics, Inc. v. Bel Fuse Inc., brought in California
Federal District Court. Plaintiff claims that its patent covers certain of
the
Company's modular jack products. That party had previously advised the Company
that it was willing to grant a non-transferable license to the Company for
an up
front fee of $500,000 plus a 6% royalty on future sales. The District Court
has
granted summary judgment in the Company's favor dismissing Regal Electronics'
infringement claims, while at the same time the Court dismissed the Company's
invalidity counterclaim against Regal Electronics. Regal
has
appealed the Court's rejection of its infringement claims to the U.S. Court
of
Appeals. The case was heard on February 6, 2007 and the U.S.
Court of Appeals upheld the District Court’s ruling in favor of the
Company.
19
The
Company cannot predict the outcome of these matters; however, management
believes that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material
impact on the Company's consolidated financial condition or results of
operations.
The
Company is not a party to any other legal proceeding, the adverse outcome of
which is likely
to have
a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial condition
or
results of operations.
Item
4. Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No
matters were submitted to a vote of the Company's shareholders during the fourth
quarter of 2006.
20
PART
II
Item
5.
Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
(a)
Market
Information
The
Company’s voting Class A Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share, and non-voting
Class B Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share ("Class A" and "Class B,"
respectively), are traded on the NASDAQ National Market. The following table
sets forth the high and low closing sales price range (as reported by The Nasdaq
Stock Market Inc.) for the Common Stock on NASDAQ for each quarter during the
past two years.
Class
A
|
Class
A
|
Class
B
|
Class
B
|
||||||||||
High
|
Low
|
High
|
Low
|
||||||||||
Year
Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
||||||||||||
First
Quarter
|
$
|
29.79
|
$
|
24.10
|
$
|
34.92
|
$
|
28.42
|
|||||
Second
Quarter
|
26.74
|
21.50
|
31.72
|
25.54
|
|||||||||
Third
Quarter
|
29.50
|
24.50
|
36.48
|
29.72
|
|||||||||
Fourth
Quarter
|
30.10
|
22.39
|
37.00
|
28.88
|
|||||||||
Year
Ended December 31, 2006
|
|||||||||||||
First
Quarter
|
34.50
|
24.59
|
40.16
|
31.83
|
|||||||||
Second
Quarter
|
29.00
|
25.75
|
34.85
|
29.24
|
|||||||||
Third
Quarter
|
31.25
|
24.95
|
37.61
|
29.49
|
|||||||||
Fourth
Quarter
|
32.95
|
25.99
|
37.92
|
30.90
|
The
Common Stock is reported under the symbols BELFA and BELFB in the NASDAQ
National Market.
21
(b)
Holders
As
of
February 28, 2007 there were 86 registered shareholders of the Company's Class
A
Common Stock and 108 registered shareholders of the Company’s Class B Common
Stock. The Company estimates that there were 1,203 beneficial shareholders
of
Class A Common Stock and 3,258 beneficial shareholders of the Company’s Class B
Common Stock as of February 28, 2007.
(c)
Dividends
There
are
no contractual restrictions on the Company's ability to pay dividends provided
the Company continues to comply with the financial tests in its credit
agreement. On February 1, 2006, May 1, 2006, August 1, 2006 and November 1,
2006
the Company paid a $0.05 per share dividend to all shareholders of record of
Class B Common Stock in the total amount of $443,589, $443,320, $447,410 and
$458,205,
respectively. On February 1, 2006, May 1, 2006, August 1, 2006 and November
1,
2006 the Company paid a $0.04 per share dividend to all shareholders of record
of Class A Common Stock in the total amount of $107,735, $107,735, $107,735
and
$107,735, respectively. On February 2, 2005, May 2, 2005, August 1, 2005, and
November 1, 2005 the Company paid a $0.05 per share dividend to all shareholders
of record of Class B Common Stock in the total amount of $433,450, $437,175,
$439,450, and $442,356, respectively. On February 2, 2005, May 2, 2005, August
1, 2005 and November 1, 2005 the Company paid a $0.04 per share dividend to
all
shareholders of record of Class A Common Stock in the total amount of $107,735,
$107,735, $107,735 and $107,735, respectively.
On
February 1, 2007 the Company paid a $0.04 and $0.05 per share dividend to all
shareholders of record at January 15, 2007 of Class A and Class B Common
Stock, respectively,
in
the
total
amount
of $107,735 and $450,404, respectively. The Company currently anticipates paying
these dividends in the future.
(d)
Securities
authorized for issuance under the Equity Compensation
Plans
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
Plan
Category
|
Number
of Securities to be
Issued
Upon Exercise of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants
and Rights
(a)
|
Weighted
Average Exercise
Price
of Outstanding Options,
Warrants
and Rights
(b)
|
Number
of Securities Remaining
Available
for Future Issuance
Under
Equity Compensation
Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected
in Column (a)
(c)
|
|||||||
Equity
compensation plans approved
by
security holders
|
137,813
|
$
|
25.59
|
811,785
|
||||||
Equity
compensation plans not
approved
by security holders
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Totals
|
137,813
|
$
|
25.59
|
811,785
|
22
Item
6. Selected Financial Data
|
||||||||||||||||
Years
Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
(c)
|
2004
|
2003
(c)
|
2002
|
||||||||||||
(In
thousands of dollars, except per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||
Selected
Statements of Operations Data: (c) (d)
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
254,933
|
$
|
215,916
|
$
|
190,022
|
$
|
158,498
|
$
|
95,528
|
||||||
Cost
of sales
|
192,985
|
156,147
|
132,776
|
113,813
|
72,420
|
|||||||||||
Selling,
general and
|
||||||||||||||||
administrative
expenses
|
37,800
|
33,152
|
31,302
|
26,757
|
22,270
|
|||||||||||
Fixed
asset impairment/casualty loss (e) (f)
|
1,030
|
-
|
1,033
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Interest
income - net
|
2,781
|
1,098
|
525
|
249
|
940
|
|||||||||||
Gain
on sale of marketable securities
|
5,150
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Lawsuit
proceeds (d)
|
-
|
-
|
2,935
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Earnings
before provision
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
for
income taxes
|
31,048
|
27,715
|
28,371
|
18,177
|
1,778
|
|||||||||||
Income
tax provision
|
5,845
|
7,482
|
3,649
|
4,413
|
1,199
|
|||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
25,203
|
20,233
|
24,722
|
13,764
|
579
|
|||||||||||
Earnings
(loss) per Class A common
|
||||||||||||||||
share
- basic (a)
|
2.03
|
1.67
|
2.10
|
1.15
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Earnings
(loss) per Class A common
|
||||||||||||||||
share
- diluted (a)
|
2.03
|
1.67
|
2.10
|
1.15
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Earnings
per Class B common
|
||||||||||||||||
share
- basic (a)
|
2.16
|
1.79
|
2.22
|
1.28
|
0.07
|
|||||||||||
Earnings
per Class B common
|
||||||||||||||||
share
- diluted (a)
|
2.15
|
1.77
|
2.16
|
1.27
|
0.07
|
|||||||||||
Cash
dividends declared per
|
||||||||||||||||
Class
A common share
|
0.16
|
0.16
|
0.16
|
0.08
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Cash
dividends declared per
|
||||||||||||||||
Class
B common share
|
0.20
|
0.20
|
0.20
|
0.20
|
0.20
|
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
As
of December 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
2003
|
2002
|
||||||||||||
(In
thousands of dollars, except per share data and
percentages)
|
||||||||||||||||
Selected
Balance Sheet Data and Ratios:
|
||||||||||||||||
Working
capital
|
$
|
144,677
|
$
|
128,203
|
$
|
127,624
|
$
|
102,370
|
$
|
82,986
|
||||||
Total
assets
|
268,498
|
242,056
|
217,777
|
181,817
|
147,840
|
|||||||||||
Long
term debt
|
-
|
-
|
6,500
|
8,500
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Stockholders'
equity
|
222,150
|
201,577
|
178,461
|
146,855
|
130,659
|
|||||||||||
Return
on average
|
||||||||||||||||
total
assets, % (b)
|
9.65
|
8.83
|
12.37
|
7.95
|
0.40
|
|||||||||||
Return
on average
|
||||||||||||||||
Stockholders'
|
||||||||||||||||
equity,
% (b)
|
11.81
|
10.75
|
15.20
|
9.93
|
0.44
|
|||||||||||
(a)
Previously reported earnings per share has been restated to present our earnings
using the two-class method. See Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
(b)
Returns on average total assets and stockholders’ equity are computed for any
year by dividing net income for such year by the average balances of total
assets or stockholders’ equity on the last day of each quarter during such year
and on the last day of the immediately preceding year.
23
(c) See Item 1 for information regarding the acquisitions during 2005 of Galaxy and Netwatch. Further, during 2003, the Company acquired Advanced Power Components plc (“APC”) and the Passive Components Group of Insilco Technologies, Inc. These transactions were accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the results of operations of Galaxy, Netwatch, the Passive Components Group of Insilco and APC have been included in the Company's financial statements since their respective dates of acquisition.
(d) The
Company was a party to an arbitration proceeding related to the acquisition
of
its Telecom Components business in 1998. The Company asserted that the seller
breached the terms of a related Global Procurement Agreement dated October
2,
1998 and sought damages related thereto. During December 2004, the Company
and
the seller settled this matter. The settlement resulted in a payment to the
Company and an unconditional release by the seller of all counterclaims against
the Company. The net gain of $2,935,000 from the settlement is included in
the
Company’s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31,
2004.
(e) During
2006, the Company
incurred a loss of $1.0 million as a result of a fire at its leased
manufacturing facility in the Dominican Republic.
The
loss was
for raw
materials and equipment in excess of estimated insurance proceeds. The
production at this facility was substantially restored during July 2006.
(f)
During
the year ended December 31, 2004 the Company wrote down fixed assets,
principally machinery and equipment, with a net book value of $1,033,000,
at its
Far East manufacturing facilities. The Company considered these fixed assets
to
be surplus equipment which was replaced by equipment with more advanced
technology.
24
Item 7. |
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results
of Operations
|
The
following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the
Company’s consolidated financial statements and the notes related thereto. The
discussion of results, causes and trends should not be construed to imply
any
conclusion that such results, causes or trends will necessarily continue in
the
future.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
Company’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of
operations are based upon the Company’s consolidated financial statements, which
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements
requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure
of
contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates
its estimates, including those related to product returns, bad debts,
inventories, intangible assets, investments, SERP expense, income taxes and
contingencies and litigation. The Company bases its estimates on historical
experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable
under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not
readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
The
Company believes the following critical accounting policies affect its more
significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated
financial statements.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
The
Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses from
the
inability of its customers to make required payments. The Company determines
its
reserves by both specific identification of customer accounts where appropriate
and the application of historical loss experience to non-specific accounts.
If
the financial condition of the Company's customers were to deteriorate,
resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional
allowances may be required.
Inventory
The
Company makes purchasing decisions principally based upon firm sales orders
from
customers, the availability and pricing of raw materials and projected customer
requirements. Future events that could adversely affect these decisions and
result in significant charges to the Company’s operations include miscalculating
customer requirements, technology changes which render certain raw materials
and
finished goods obsolete, loss of customers and/or cancellation of sales orders,
stock rotation with distributors and termination of distribution agreements.
The
Company writes down its inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable
inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the
estimated market value based upon the aforementioned assumptions. If actual
market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management,
additional inventory write-downs may be required.
25
When
inventory is written-off, it is never written back up; the cost remains at
zero
or the level to which it has been written-down. When inventory that has been
written-off is subsequently used in the manufacturing process, the lower
adjusted cost of the material is charged to cost of sales. Should any of this
inventory be used in the manufacturing process for customer orders, the improved
gross profit will be recognized at the time the completed product is shipped
and
the sale is recorded.
Goodwill
and Intangible Assets
The
assets and liabilities of acquired businesses are recorded under the purchase
method of accounting at their estimated fair values at the dates of acquisition.
Goodwill represents costs in excess of fair values assigned to the underlying
net assets of acquired businesses.
Goodwill
and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives are not amortized, but
are
subject to annual impairment testing. The identification and measurement of
goodwill impairment involves the estimation of the fair value of geographic
reporting units. The estimates of fair value of geographic reporting units
are
based on the best information available as of the date of the assessment, which
primarily incorporate management assumptions about expected future cash flows
and contemplate other valuation techniques. Future cash flows can be affected
by
changes in industry or market conditions or the rate and extent to which
anticipated synergies or cost savings are realized with newly acquired entities.
There can be no assurances that goodwill impairments will not occur in the
future. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further
discussion.
Income
Taxes
Income
taxes are accounted for under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(“SFAS”) No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” In accordance with SFAS No.
109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax
consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax
bases, as measured by enacted tax rates that are expected to be in effect in
the
periods when the deferred tax assets and liabilities are expected to be settled
or realized. Significant judgment is required in determining the worldwide
provisions for income taxes. In the ordinary course of a global business, the
ultimate tax outcome is uncertain for many transactions. It is the Company’s
policy to establish provisions for taxes that may become payable in future
years
as a result of an examination by tax authorities. The Company establishes the
provisions based upon management’s assessment of exposure associated with
permanent tax differences and tax credits applied to temporary difference
adjustments. The tax provisions are analyzed periodically (at least quarterly)
and adjustments are made as events occur that warrant adjustments to those
provisions.
26
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the guidance contained in SEC
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition in Financial
Statements”. Revenue is recognized when the product has been delivered and title
and risk of loss have passed to the customer, collection of the resulting
receivable is deemed reasonably assured by management, persuasive evidence
of an
arrangement exists and the sale price is fixed and determinable.
Historically
the Company has been successful in mitigating the risks associated with its
revenue. Some issues relate to product warranty, credit worthiness of its
customers and concentration of sales among a few major customers.
The
Company is not contractually obligated to accept returns from non-distributor
customers except for defective product or in instances where the product does
not meet the Company’s quality specifications. If these conditions existed, the
Company would be obligated to repair or replace the defective product or make
a
cash settlement with the customer. Distributors generally have the right to
return up to 5% of their purchases over the previous three to six months and
are
obligated to purchase an amount at least equal to the return. If the Company
terminates a distributor, the Company is obligated to accept as a return all
of
the distributor’s inventory from the Company. The Company accrues an estimate
for anticipated returns based on historical experience at the time revenue
is
recognized and adjusts such estimate as specific anticipated returns are
identified. If a distributor terminates its relationship with the Company,
the
Company is not obligated to accept any inventory returns. The Company has a
significant amount of sales with several customers, including one major customer
with sales of $42,167,000 (16.5%) in 2006. The loss of any one of these
customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated
results of operations and financial position.
27
Overview
Bel
is a
leading producer of electronic products that help make global connectivity
a
reality. The Company designs, manufactures and markets a broad array of
magnetics, modules, circuit protection devices and interconnect products. While
these products are deployed primarily in the computer, networking and
telecommunication industries, Bel’s expanding portfolio of products also finds
application in the automotive, medical and consumer electronics markets. Bel's
products are designed to protect, regulate, connect, isolate or manage a variety
of electronic circuits.
We
design
our products to enhance the systems in which they operate. As our products
typically become components in other third-party’s systems, our revenues are
largely driven by the extent to which our customers can design and develop
new
applications and the extent to which those customers have needs for the types
of
components that we can provide. We are problem-solvers; we design most of our
products to combine various discrete components in a manner that will allow
the
systems designer to save space and to offer a more efficient
product.
Our
expenses are driven principally by the cost of the materials that we use and
the
cost of labor where our factories are located. In recent years, the increasing
cost of copper, steel and petroleum-based products and an
increased wage structure in the Far East have contributed to increases in
manufacturing costs.
Effective September 1, 2006, local PRC authorities implemented a new revised
standard work week, and new minimum wages and overtime rates, for areas where
our factories are located.
During
2006, approximately $4.6 million of the Company’s sales increase was
attributable to the acquisition by the Company of Galaxy Power, Inc. (“Galaxy”)
which occurred on March 22, 2005 and Netwatch s.r.o. (now named Bel Stewart
Net
s.r.o.) which occurred on June 30, 2005. The $4.6 million of sales increase
attributable to Galaxy and Netwatch for the periods January 1, 2006 to March
22,
2006 and January 1, 2006 to June 30, 2006, respectively represents sales during
these periods of 2006. There were no sales during these same periods in 2005
because it was prior to the acquisition of these entities. The Company had
an
organic sales increase of $34.5
million or 16.0%
during 2006. The organic sales increase is measured by the difference between
net sales for 2006, less net sales for 2005, less the $4.6 million sales
increase attributed to Galaxy and Netwatch for the periods discussed above.
The
2005 acquisitions resulted in additional Cost of Sales and Selling, General
and
Administrative expenses of $12.7 million and $3.3 million, respectively, during
2006.
Gross
profit margins were lower during 2006 compared to 2005, principally due to
increased raw material costs resulting from higher commodity prices for copper,
steel, and petroleum-based products and changes in the Company’s product mix.
Sales of the Company’s DC-DC power products have increased. While these products
are strategic to Bel’s growth and important to total earnings, they return lower
gross profit percentage margins,
as a
larger percentage of their bills of material are purchased components. As these
sales continue to increase, the Company’s average gross profit percentage will
likely decrease unless offset by increased sales of higher margin products.
The
increasing sales of the Company's DC-DC power products also have an impact
on
the accelerated write off of intangible assets related to the acquisition of
Current Concepts, Inc. (“Current Concepts”). The contingent purchase price
payments are accounted for as additional purchase price and as an increase
to
covenants not to compete within intangible assets when such payment obligations
are incurred. Due to the shorter remaining lives of the covenants not to
compete, any additional contingent purchase price payments that are allocated
to
covenants not to compete are amortized over a shorter remaining life. During
2006,
Current Concepts reached its benchmark sales target and no additional contingent
purchase price payments will be made. Gross profit margins are also adversely
affected to the extent that the Company manufactures lead-free products, as
the
Company has additional labor and manufacturing costs associated
with operating duplicate production lines but
cannot attain premium pricing for such products.
28
The
Company also incurred $1.6 million in pre-tax stock-based compensation expense
during the year ended December 31, 2006 in connection with its stock
incentive plans.
This
expense is reflected both in the Company’s cost of sales and selling, general
and administrative expenses, consistent with the classification of employee
compensation expense.
During
the year ended December 31, 2006 the Company incurred a $1.0 million pre-tax
casualty loss primarily for raw materials destroyed by a fire at a Company
leased manufacturing facility in the Dominican Republic in excess of insured
amounts.
During
the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company realized a gain on marketable
securities of $5.2 million from the sale of Artesyn common stock, net of
investment banking fees, offset by a $1.0 million accrual (classified within
selling, general and administrative expense for accounting purposes) for
performance bonuses awarded by the Board of Directors in connection with the
gain and was paid to key employees during January 2007.
In
connection with the decline in fair value of the Company’s investment in the
common stock of Toko, Inc., the Company has recorded (as of December 31, 2006)
an unrealized loss, net of income tax benefit, of approximately $1.5 million
which is included in accumulated other comprehensive income as stated in the
Company’s consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity.
29
Results
of Operations
The
following table sets forth, for the past three years, the percentage
relationship to net sales of certain items included in the Company’s
consolidated statements of operations.
Percentage
of Net Sales
|
||||||||||
Years
Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
Net
sales
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
||||
Cost
of sales
|
75.7
|
72.3
|
69.9
|
|||||||
Selling,
general and
|
||||||||||
administrative
expenses
|
14.8
|
15.4
|
16.5
|
|||||||
Casualty
loss
|
0.4
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Fixed
asset impairment
|
-
|
-
|
0.5
|
|||||||
Interest
income - net
|
(1.1
|
)
|
(0.5
|
)
|
(0.3
|
)
|
||||
Gain
on sale of marketable
|
||||||||||
securities
|
(2.0
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Lawsuit
proceeds
|
-
|
-
|
(1.5
|
)
|
||||||
Earnings
before provision for
|
||||||||||
income
taxes
|
12.2
|
12.8
|
14.9
|
|||||||
Income
tax provision
|
2.3
|
3.5
|
1.9
|
|||||||
Net
earnings
|
9.9
|
9.4
|
13.0
|
30
The
following table sets forth the year over year percentage increases or decreases
of certain items included in the Company's consolidated statements of
operations.
Increase
(Decrease) from Prior
Period |
|||||||
2006
compared with 2005 |
2005
compared with 2004 |
||||||
Net
sales
|
18.1
|
%
|
13.6
|
%
|
|||
Cost
of sales
|
23.6
|
17.6
|
|||||
Selling,
general and
|
|||||||
administrative
expenses
|
14.0
|
5.9
|
|||||
Net
earnings
|
24.6
|
(18.2
|
)
|
||||
Sales
Net
sales
increased 18.1% from $215.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2005
to
$254.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2006. The Company attributes
the increase to increased module sales of $21.3 million of which $3.4 million
is
attributable to the acquisition of Galaxy, which was included in our sales
for a
full year in 2006 and 9 months in 2005, strong demand for interconnect products
resulting in an increase of $3.8 million in such sales, of which $1.2 million
is
attributable to the acquisition of Netwatch,
and
strong demand for magnetic sales resulting in an increase of $14.3 million
in
such sales, while circuit protection sales decreased by $0.4 million. Bel had
an
organic sales increase of 16.0% for the year.
The
significant components of the Company's revenues for the year ended December
31,
2006 were magnetic products of $141.5 million (as compared with $127.2 million
during the year ended December 31, 2005), interconnect products of $44.5 million
(as compared with $40.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2005), module
products of $49.5 million (as compared with $28.2 million during the year ended
December 31, 2005) and circuit protection products of $19.4 million(as compared
with $19.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2005).
During
the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company experienced a decrease in sales compared
to the third quarter of 2006 of approximately $12.7 million across almost all
product lines. The Company attributes the decrease in sales to increased
customer inventories and uncertainty by customers relating to inventory
management practices related to the annual first quarter of 2007 Lunar New
Year
factory closedowns.
31
Based
in
part on conflicting opinions the Company received from customers and competitors
in the electronics industry pertaining to revenue growth during 2006, the
Company cannot predict with any degree of certainty its
sales
revenue for 2007. Although the Company's backlog has been stable, the Company
believes
that
this is not a good indicator of future revenues. The Company continues to have
limited visibility as to future customer requirements. The Company had one
customer with sales in excess of 10% (16.5%) of total sales during the year
ended December 31, 2006. The loss of this customer could have a material adverse
effect on the Company's results of operations, financial position and cash
flows.
The
Company cannot quantify the extent of sales growth arising from unit sales
mix
and/or price changes. Given the change in the nature of the products purchased
by customers from period to period, the Company believes that neither unit
changes nor price changes are meaningful. Over the past year, newer and more
sophisticated products with higher unit selling prices have been introduced.
Through the Company's engineering and research effort, the Company has been
successful in adding additional value to existing product lines, which tends
to
increase sales prices initially until that generation of products becomes mature
and sales prices experience price degradation. In general, as products become
mature, average selling prices decrease.
Net
sales
increased 13.6% from $190.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2004
to
$215.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2005. The Company attributes
the increase to increased module sales of $14.4 million,
of which
$10.6 million is attributable to the acquisition of Galaxy, strong demand for
interconnect products resulting in an increase of $6.6 million in such sales,
of
which $1.4 million is attributable to the acquisition of Netwatch,
and
strong demand for magnetic sales resulting in an increase of $4.9 million in
such sales, while circuit protection sales remained substantially unchanged.
Excluding 2005 acquisitions, Bel had an organic sales increase of 7.3% for
the
year.
The
significant components of the Company's revenues for the year ended December
31,
2005 were magnetic products of $127.2 million (as compared with $122.4 million
during the year ended December 31, 2004), interconnect products of $40.7 million
(as compared with $34.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2004), module
products of $28.2 million (as compared with $13.8 million during the year ended
December 31, 2004 and circuit protection products of $19.8 million (as compared
with $19.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2004).
32
Cost
of Sales
Bel
generally enters into processing arrangements with five independent third party
contractors in the Far East. Costs are recorded as incurred for all products
manufactured either at the Company's third party facilities or at the Company's
own manufacturing facilities. Such amounts are determined based upon the
estimated stage of production and include labor cost and fringes and related
allocations of factory overhead. The Company manufactures finished goods at
its
own manufacturing facilities in Glen Rock, Pennsylvania, Inwood, New York,
the
Dominican Republic, Mexico and the Czech Republic.
Cost
of
sales as a percentage of net sales increased from 72.3% during the year ended
December 31, 2005 to 75.7% during the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase
in the cost of sales percentage is primarily attributable to the
following:
¨ |
The
Company incurred a 4.6% increase in material costs as a percentage
of net
sales. The increase in raw material costs is principally related
to
increased manufacturing of modules (including new Power products
commencing
in
the second half of 2005), which have a higher raw
material content than the Company’s other products, increased
costs for raw materials such as mosfets, steel, integrated circuits,
PCB’s
and petroleum-based products and increased transportation
costs.
|
¨ |
The
Company’s subcontracting processors have also started to pay higher wage
rates and benefits to its production workers in China,
resulting from a new revised standard work week, new minimum wages
and new
overtime rates.
These higher rates and benefits are reflected in the Company’s cost of
sales.
|
¨ |
Sales
of the Company’s DC-DC power products have increased. While these products
are strategic to Bel’s growth and important to total earnings, they return
lower gross profit percentage margins as a larger percentage of their
bills of materials are purchased components. As these sales continue
to
increase, the Company’s average gross profit percentage will likely
decrease. The increasing sales also have an impact on the accelerated
write-off of intangibles related to contingent purchase price payments
arising from the acquisition of Current Concepts as the amortization
life
of the identifiable intangibles have expired and all payments are
expensed
in the period they were paid.
|
Included
in cost of sales are research and development expenses of $6.6 million and
$7.3
million for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The
principal reason for the decrease is less research and development in the United
States due to the consolidation of the Bel Power and the Galaxy facilities
in
Massachusetts. This
was
offset in part by increased expenses at the Company’s China research and
development facility which has a lower cost structure.
Cost
of
sales as a percentage of net sales increased from 69.9% during the year ended
December 31, 2004
to 72.3%
during the year ended December 31, 2005.
The
increase in the cost of sales percentage is primarily attributable to the
same
factors that led to the increase in the cost of sales as a percentage of net
sales from 2005 to 2006. From 2004 to 2005, the
Company
incurred a 2.1% increase in material costs as a percentage of net
sales.
Included
in cost of sales are research and development expenses of $7.3
million
for both
2004 and 2005.
33
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
The
percentage relationship of selling, general and administrative expenses to
net
sales decreased from 15.4% during the year ended December 31, 2005 to 14.8%
during the year ended December 31, 2006, in part as a result of the Company's
ability to leverage general and administrative expenses over a larger revenue
base. The $4.6
million increase in the dollar amount of such expenses included
increased selling expenses of approximately $1.4 million, including $.2 million
in Bel Power related expenses. The
$3.2
million increase in general and administrative expenses
included $1.0
million related to Bel Power, additional salaries, wages and bonuses of $2.3
million,
principally attributable to the $1.0 million bonus approved by the Board of
Directors in connection with the gain from the sale of Artesyn stock, additional
stock compensation expense of $.8 million, partially arising from the Company’s
implementation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123
(R)
during
2006 (See below and Notes 1 and 10 of the Notes to the Company’s Consolidated
Financial Statements), and additional professional fees of $1.0 million
principally related to Sarbanes-Oxley
compliance and legal expenses in connection with various lawsuits in
which
the
Company is involved.
These
increases were offset in part by other net decreases in several expense accounts
totaling $1.9 million.
The
percentage relationship of selling, general and administrative expenses to
net
sales decreased from 16.5% during the year ended December 31, 2004 to 15.4%
during the year ended December 31, 2005, in part as a result of the Company's
ability to leverage general and administrative expenses over a larger revenue
base. The Company attributes the $1.8 million increase in the dollar amount
of
such expenses primarily to increased selling expenses of approximately $1.1
million, including $0.6 million in Galaxy related expenses. In addition, the
Company incurred a $.7 million increase in general and administrative expenses.
This increase includes $1.8 million related to Galaxy, additional bad debt
expense of approximately $0.3 million,
additional stock compensation expense of $0.2 million,
arising
from the grant
of restricted
stock,
and
additional amortization of identifiable intangibles in the amount of $.8 million
principally arising from the acquisition of Galaxy. Of the $.8 million increase
in amortization of intangibles,
$.7
million is included in the $1.8 million increase in general and administrative
expenses related to Galaxy. The Company incurred increased Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) costs of approximately $0.2 million as
additional employees were added to the plan. This was offset in part by lower
employment costs of $0.6 million due to reduced bonuses and lower professional
fees of $1.2 million due to lower Sarbanes-Oxley compliance costs.
34
Casualty
Loss
During
2006, the
Company
incurred a $1.0 million pre-tax casualty loss as a result of a fire at its
leased manufacturing facility in the Dominican Republic.
The
loss was
for raw
materials and equipment in excess of estimated insurance proceeds. The
production at this facility was substantially restored during July 2006.
Fixed
Asset Impairment
During
the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company wrote down fixed assets,
principally machinery and equipment, with a net book value of $1,033,000,
at its
Far East manufacturing facilities. The Company considered these fixed assets
to
be surplus equipment which was replaced by equipment with more advanced
technology.
Interest
Income
Interest
income earned on cash and cash equivalents increased by approximately $1.4
million during the year ended December 31, 2006 as compared to the year ended
December 31, 2005. The increase is due primarily to increased balances of cash
and cash equivalent balances and higher yields on such balances.
Interest
income earned on cash and cash equivalents increased by approximately $660,000
during the year ended December 31, 2005 as compared to the comparable period
in
2004. The increase is due primarily to increased earnings on cash and cash
equivalent balances and marketable securities.
Interest
Expense
A
$10
million term loan was entered into on March 21, 2003, representing
borrowings for
the
acquisition of Insilco's Passive Components Group. The loan bore interest at
LIBOR plus 1.50%,
payable
quarterly,
and was
completely paid off by June 30, 2005. Interest expense related to these
borrowings amounted to $325,000 during the year ended December 31, 2005. During
the year ended December 31, 2006, interest expense amounted to $71,000,
representing financing expenses related to the Company's credit facility in
the
United States.
35
Interest
expense increased by approximately $90,000 during the year ended December 31,
2005 compared with 2004. The increase is attributable in part to higher interest
rates charged on the above-mentioned
term loan
during 2005 compared to 2004 and in part to the fact that during March 2005
the
Company borrowed $8.0 million against its domestic line of credit to partially
finance the acquisition of Galaxy. During October and November of 2005 the
Company borrowed $4.0 million against its line of credit. The loan was repaid
during December 2005. The loan bore interest at LIBOR plus .75% to 1.25%
annually,
based on
certain financial statement ratios maintained by the Company.
Lawsuit
Proceeds
During
the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company settled an arbitration proceeding
related to a 1998 acquisition. The Company received $2,935,000 (net of $65,000
of related legal expenses incurred during the period) pursuant to that
settlement.
Provision
for Income Taxes
The
provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2006 was $5.8 million
compared to $7.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2005. The Company's
earnings before income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2006 were
approximately $3.3 million higher than in 2005. During the year ended December
31, 2006, the Company incurred lower taxes of approximately $1.7 million
principally as a result of lower foreign taxes in the Far East due to the
implementation by the Company of its Macao Commercial Offshore Company (“MCO”),
which is not subject to Macao corporate income taxes. This was offset in part
by
higher United States taxes resulting principally from the gain from the sale
of
marketable securities (Artesyn). This had an impact of reducing the effective
tax rate from 27.0% for the year ended December 31, 2005 to 18.8% for the year
ended December 31, 2006 (measured by reflecting the tax provision as a
percentage of earnings before provision for income taxes). Additionally, during
the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company repatriated $70.6 million of
foreign earnings which resulted in higher taxes of $3.1 million during the
year
ended December 31, 2005.
The
provision for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2005 was $7.5 million
compared to $3.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2004. The Company's
earnings before income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2005 were
approximately $0.6 million less than in 2004. The Company incurred higher taxes
of approximately $3.1 million
as a result of repatriating $70.6 million of foreign earnings during 2005.
Additionally, the income tax effective rate was
higher
in
2005
than
in
2004
primarily due to higher foreign taxes
associated with the treatment by
Hong
Kong authorities
of
offshore income. This was offset in part by the utilization of approximately
$0.6 million in research and development tax credits and the utilization of
a
$0.1 million net operating loss carryforward tax benefit related to a foreign
subsidiary. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company
reversed tax accruals no longer required in the amount of approximately $0.4
million, utilized certain tax credits amounting to $0.8 million and utilized
net
operating loss carry forwards with a tax effect of approximately $0.1
million.
36
The
Company is currently being audited by the United States Internal Revenue Service
(“IRS”) for the year ended December 31, 2004. As part of this audit the IRS is
also reviewing
the
years
ended December 31, 2003 and 2005. This examination is in its early stages and
to
date no adjustments have been proposed by the IRS.
The
Company conducts manufacturing activities in the Far East. More specifically,
the Company has the majority of its products manufactured in the People’s
Republic of China (“PRC”), Hong Kong and Macao and has not been subject to
corporate income tax in the PRC. The Company's activities in Hong Kong have
generally consisted of administration, quality control and accounting, as well
as some limited manufacturing activities. Hong Kong imposes corporate income
tax
at a rate of 17.5 percent solely on income sourced to Hong Kong. That is, its
tax system is a territorial one which only seeks to tax activities conducted
in
Hong Kong.
Macao
currently has a statutory corporate income tax rate of 12 percent. However,
the
Company, in previous years, as a result of investing in a certain location
in
Macao, was able to obtain a 10-year tax holiday in Macao, thereby reducing
its
effective Macao income tax rate from 16 percent to 8 percent. The tax holiday
in
Macao expired in April 2004. Since most of the Company's operations are
conducted in the Far East, the majority of its profits are sourced in these
three Far East jurisdictions. Accordingly, the profits earned in the U.S. are
comparatively small in relation to its profits earned in the Far East.
Therefore, there is generally a significant difference between the statutory
U.S. tax rate and the Company's effective tax rate.
During
2005, the Company was granted an offshore operating license from the government
of Macao to set up an MCO named Bel Fuse (Macao Commercial Offshore) Limited
with the intent to handle all of the Company’s sales to third party customers in
Asia. Sales to third party customers commenced during the first quarter of
2006.
Sales consist of products manufactured in the PRC. The MCO is not subject to
Macao corporate income taxes.
The
Company has historically followed a practice of reinvesting a portion of the
earnings of foreign subsidiaries in the expansion of its foreign operations.
If
the unrepatriated earnings were distributed to the parent corporation rather
than reinvested in the Far East, such funds would be subject to United States
Federal income taxes. During the year ended December 31, 2005, management
repatriated
foreign earnings of approximately $70.6 million which were
eligible
for the reduced tax rate of 5.25% under the American Jobs Creations Act of
2004.
See Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. As a result of the
favorable tax treatment afforded the repatriation of controlled foreign
corporation (“CFC”) earnings and management’s decision to repatriate such funds
in 2005, the Company recorded a $6,326,000 tax benefit in 2004 which
resulted
from the
difference in tax rates between the Act and the tax rates previously provided
on
the portion of CFC earnings which were expected to be repatriated, leaving
deferred income taxes in the amount of approximately $1,342,000 recorded in
such
earnings to be repatriated.
37
Inflation
and Foreign Currency Exchange
During
the past two years, the effect of inflation on the Company's profitability
was
not material. Historically, fluctuations of the U.S. Dollar against other major
currencies have not significantly affected the Company's foreign operations
as
most sales have been denominated in U.S. Dollars or currencies directly or
indirectly linked to the U.S. Dollar. Most significant expenses, including
raw
materials, labor and manufacturing expenses, are either incurred in U.S. Dollars
or the currencies of the Hong Kong Dollar, the Macao Pataca or the Chinese
Renminbi. The Chinese Renminbi has appreciated in value during 2006. Further
appreciation of the Renminbi would result in the Company incurring higher costs
for all expenses incurred in China. Commencing with the acquisition of the
Passive Components Group, the Company's European entity has sales transactions
which are denominated principally in Euros and British Pounds. Conversion of
these transactions into U.S. dollars has resulted in currency exchange (losses)
gains of ($201,000), $27,000 and $54,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004, respectively, which
were
charged to expense, and approximately $388,000, ($669,000) and $386,000 for
the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, in net unrealized
exchange gains (losses) relating to the translation of foreign subsidiary
financial statements which are included in other comprehensive income. Any
change in linkage of the U.S. Dollar and the Hong Kong Dollar, the Chinese
Renminbi or the Macao Pataca could have a material effect on the Company's
consolidated financial position or results of operations.
38
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Historically,
the Company has financed its capital expenditures primarily through cash flows
from operating activities
and has
financed acquisitions both through cash flows from operating activities and
borrowings.
Management believes that the cash flow from operations after payments of
dividends combined with its existing capital base and the Company's available
lines of credit, will be sufficient to fund its operations for the near term.
Such statement constitutes a Forward Looking Statement. Factors which could
cause the Company to require additional capital include, among other things,
a
softening in the demand for the Company’s existing products, an inability to
respond to customer demand for new products, potential acquisitions requiring
substantial capital, future expansion of the Company's operations and net losses
that would result in net cash being used in operating, investing and/or
financing activities which result in net decreases in cash and cash equivalents.
Net losses may result in the loss of domestic and foreign credit facilities
and
preclude the Company from raising debt or equity financing in the capital
markets
on
affordable terms or otherwise.
During
March 2005, the Company borrowed $8 million against a
$10
million
line of
credit to partially finance the acquisition of Galaxy. The outstanding balance
was paid off in its entirety on June 30, 2005. During July 2005, the Company
amended its credit agreement to increase the line of credit to $20
million. During
October and November of 2005, the Company borrowed $4.0 million against the
line
of credit which was paid off during December 2005. As
of
December 31, 2006, the entire $20 million line of credit was available to the
Company to borrow. The loan was
initially
collateralized with a first priority security interest in and lien on
100%
of
the issued and outstanding shares of the capital stock of the Company's material
domestic subsidiaries and 65%
of
all the issued and outstanding shares of the capital stock of certain of the
foreign subsidiaries of the Company and all other personal property of
the
Company. In July, 2005, the lender terminated it's security interest in assets
of the Company other than the lender’s first priority security interest in 100%
of the issued and outstanding shares of the capital stock of the Company's
material domestic subsidiaries and 65% of all the issued and outstanding shares
of the capital stock of certain of the foreign subsidiaries of the Company.
During February, 2007, the Company replaced the $20 million line of credit
with
a $20 million line of credit from a different lender, on substantially the
same
terms and conditions as previously existed, except that the new lender did
not
receive a security interest in any assets of the Company.
For
the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the
Company recorded interest expense of approximately $71,000, $325,000 and
$239,000, respectively.
The
Company's Hong Kong subsidiary has an unsecured line of credit of approximately
$2 million, which was unused at December 31, 2006. This line of credit expires
during July 2007. Borrowing on this line of credit is guaranteed by the U.S.
parent. The line of credit bears interest at a rate determined by the bank
as
the financing is extended.
For
information regarding further commitments under the Company's operating leases,
see Note 15 of the
Notes
to
the
Company's
Consolidated Financial Statements.
For
information regarding the Company's 2005 acquisitions of Galaxy Power Inc.
and
Netwatch s.r.o.,
see
Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
39
For
information regarding the Company’s acquisition
of shares
of
the common stock of Toko,
Inc.,
see
Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The
Company completed construction of a 117,000 square foot manufacturing facility,
during November 2006, in Zhongshan City, PRC for approximately $1.3 million.
During
2004, the Company completed construction of a 64,000 square foot manufacturing
facility in Zhongshan City, PRC for approximately $1.0 million.
On
July
15, 2004, the Company entered into an agreement for the sale of a certain parcel
of land located in Jersey City, New Jersey. The sales agreement is subject
to a
due diligence period by the buyer. The sales agreement expired during January
2006. The buyer and seller are continuing to negotiate about certain
environmental matters among themselves and with the State of New Jersey. The
seller and buyer are aware that a portion of the property may be subject to
tidelands claims by the State of New Jersey. Additionally, the Company is
obligated for environmental remediation costs of up to $350,000. As of December
31, 2006, the Company had also paid $247,000 of legal, site testing and State
of
New Jersey Environmental Protection Agency Fees. As these costs are incurred,
the Company has
capitalized
them on
the Company's consolidated balance sheet as assets held for sale. The Company
has classified the asset as held for sale with a net book value of approximately
$848,000 on the Company's consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2006 and
expects to sell the property during the first half of 2007.
Under
the
terms of the E-Power LTD (“E-Power”) and Current Concepts, Inc. (“Current
Concepts”) acquisition agreements of May 11, 2001, the Company was required to
make contingent purchase price payments up to an aggregate of $7.6 million
should the acquired companies attain specified related sales levels. E-Power
was
to
be paid
$2.0 million in contingent purchase price payments if sales reach $15.0 million
and an additional $4.0 million if sales reach $25.0 million on a cumulative
basis through May 2007. During
February 2006, E-Power was paid $2.0 million in contingent purchase price
payments as E-Power's sales, as defined, reached $15.0 million. The
$25.0
million benchmark was reached during September 2006. As a result, $4.0 million
was paid in November 2006, and accounted for as additional purchase price and
as
an increase to goodwill. No additional payments will be made under the E-Power
agreement. Current Concepts is
to
be paid
16% of related sales on the first $10.0 million in sales through May 2007.
This
$10 million benchmark was reached during the second quarter of 2006 and
therefore no additional payments will be made. During the years ended December
31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company paid approximately $447,000, $529,000 and
$354,000, respectively, in contingent purchase price payments to Current
Concepts. The contingent purchase price payments to Current Concepts have been
accounted for as additional purchase price and as an increase to
covenants
not to compete within intangible assets.
40
On
May 9,
2000, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 10% of the
Company’s outstanding common shares from time to time in market or privately
negotiated transactions. As of December 31, 2006, the Company had purchased
and
retired 23,600 Class B shares at a cost of approximately $808,000, which reduced
the number of Class B common shares outstanding. No shares were repurchased
during the year ended December 31, 2006.
During
the year ended December 31, 2006, the Company's cash and cash equivalents
increased by approximately $24.8 million, reflecting approximately
$19.0
million provided by operating activities (principally as a result of net income
of $25.2 million and depreciation and amortization expense of $9.0 million
offset in part by a gain on the sale of marketable securities of $5.1 million),
proceeds of $24.5
million
from the
sale of marketable securities
and
proceeds of $3.2 million from the exercise of stock options,
offset
in part by expenditures
of $9.4
million for the purchase of property, plant and equipment, $7.0
million used principally for acquisitions, $3.6
million for the purchase of marketable securities
and $2.2
million for payments of dividends.
During
the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company's cash and cash equivalents
decreased by approximately $19.2 million, reflecting approximately $20.8 million
used principally for acquisitions, $19.4 million for loan repayments,
$18.0
million for the purchase of marketable securities, $7.7
million
for the purchase of property, plant and equipment, and $2.2 million for payments
of dividends,
offset,
in part, by $31.3 million provided by operating activities (principally as
a
result of net income of $20.2 million and depreciation and amortization expense
of $10.1 million), borrowings of $12.0 million, proceeds of $4.1 million from
the exercise of stock options and $1.6 million in proceeds from the sale of
marketable securities.
During
the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents
increased by approximately $13.7 million, reflecting approximately $32.1 million
provided by operating activities (principally as a result of net income of
$24.7
million and depreciation expense of $9.0 million), $6.3 million provided from
the sale of marketable securities and $3.9 million from proceeds from the
exercise of stock options offset, in part, by $17.7 million for the purchase
of
marketable securities, $6.6 million for the purchase of property, plant and
equipment, $2.0 million for loan repayments, $2.2 million for payment of
dividends and $.4 million for contingent acquisition payments.
Cash,
marketable securities and cash equivalents and accounts receivable comprised
approximately 50.7% and 53.6% of the Company's total assets at December 31,
2006
and December 31, 2005, respectively. The Company's current ratio (i.e., the
ratio of current assets to current liabilities) was 4.5 to 1 and 4.5 to 1 at
December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.
41
Accounts
receivable, net of allowances, were $43.8 million at December 31, 2006, as
compared with $39.3 million at December 31, 2005, reflecting, among other
things, pressures from certain customers to increase their credit terms.
Inventories were $46.3 million at December 31, 2006, as compared with $32.9
million at December 31, 2005. The increase in inventories reflected increased
sales during 2006, increased raw materials prices and an effort by the Company
to build slighter higher inventory levels to assure that the Company is able
to
satisfy customer demand during the Lunar New Year holidays in
China.
The
following table sets forth at December 31, 2006 the amounts of payments due
under specific types of contractual obligations, aggregated by category of
contractual obligation, for the time periods described below.
Payments
due by period
|
||||||||||||||||
Contractual
Obligations
|
Total
|
Less
than
1
year
|
1-3
years
|
3-5
years
|
More
than
5
years
|
|||||||||||
Capital
expenditure obligations
|
$
|
1,491,613
|
$
|
1,491,613
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Operating
leases
|
4,734,766
|
1,658,502
|
1,932,688
|
1,143,576
|
||||||||||||
Raw
material purchase obligations
|
14,641,552
|
14,641,552
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
20,867,931
|
$
|
17,791,667
|
$
|
1,932,688
|
$
|
1,143,576
|
$
|
-
|
The
Company is required to pay SERP
obligations at the occurrence of certain events. As of December 31, 2006, the
SERP had an unfunded benefit obligation of approximately $1.6 million, net
of
deferred income tax benefit. The gross unfunded benefit obligation in the amount
of $4.7 million is included in long-term liabilities as an unfunded pension
obligation on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. The unfunded benefit
obligation, net of deferred income tax benefits, is included in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet as a component of “Other Comprehensive Income.”
Other
Matters
The
Company believes that it has sufficient cash reserves to fund its foreseeable
working capital needs. It may, however, seek to expand such resources through
bank borrowings, at favorable lending rates, from time to time. If the Company
were to undertake a substantial acquisition for cash, the acquisition would
likely need to be financed in part through bank borrowings or the issuance
of
public or private debt or equity. If the Company borrows money to finance
acquisitions, this would likely decrease the Company’s ratio of earnings to
fixed charges and adversely affect other leverage criteria and could result
in
the imposition of material restrictive covenants. Under its existing credit
facility, the Company is required to obtain its lender’s consent for certain
additional debt financing, to comply with other covenants including the
application of specific financial ratios, and may be restricted from paying
cash
dividends on its common stock. The Company cannot assure that the necessary
acquisition financing would be available to it on acceptable terms, or at all,
when required. If the Company issues a substantial amount of stock either as
consideration in an acquisition or to finance an acquisition, such issuance
may
dilute existing stockholders and may take the form of capital stock having
preferences over its existing common stock.
42
New
Financial Accounting Standards
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 158, “Employers’
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Post Retirement Plans”, an
amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R). SFAS 158 requires
employers to recognize their defined benefit plans’ overfunded or underfunded
status in their balance sheets, requires employers to measure plan assets and
plan obligations as of the balance sheet date, immediately recognize any
remaining transition obligation currently being deferred, and recognize
actuarial gains and losses through other comprehensive income. The statement
is
effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006. For additional
information regarding the accounting treatment and effect on the Consolidated
Balance Sheet of SFAS No.
158,
see Note
12 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, which
enhances existing guidance for measuring assets and liabilities using fair
value. This Standard provides a single definition of fair value, together with
a
framework for measuring it, and requires additional disclosure about the use
of
fair value to measure assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007,
and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not believe
that
SFAS No. 157 will have a material impact on its financial
statements.
In
September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff
Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year
Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
Statements” (“SAB No. 108”). SAB No. 108 provides guidance on the consideration
of effects of the prior year misstatements in quantifying current year
misstatements for the purpose of a materiality assessment. We adopted SAB No.
108 in the fourth quarter of 2006 and adoption of SAB No. 108 did not impact
our
consolidated financial results.
In
July
2006, FASB issued Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes” ("FIN 48"). The interpretation requires a two step approach for
recognizing and measuring tax benefits based on a recognition threshold of
“more
likely than not”. The FASB also requires explicit disclosures about
uncertainties in tax positions including a detailed rollforward of tax benefits
that do not qualify for financial statement recognition. The adoption of FIN
48
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. While the
Company’s analysis of the impact of this Interpretation is not yet complete, we
do not anticipate it will have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial
Statements or with any of the Company’s debt covenants.
43
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159 (“SFAS 159”) “The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”, providing companies with an
option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The
Standard’s objective is to reduce both complexity in accounting for financial
instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets
and liabilities differently. It also requires entities to display the fair
value
of those assets and liabilities for which the Company has chosen to use fair
value on the face of the balance sheet. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact of the adoption of this Statement on its financial statements. SFAS
159
also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements designed to facilitate
comparisons between companies that choose different measurement attributes
for
similar types of assets and liabilities. The Standard requires companies to
provide additional information that will help investors and other users of
financial statements to more easily understand the effect of a company’s choice
to use fair value on its earnings. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact of the adoption of this Statement on its financial
statements.
44
Item
7A.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments — The estimated fair values of financial
instruments have been determined by the Company using available market
information and appropriate valuation methodologies.
The
Company has not entered into, and does not expect to enter into, financial
instruments for trading or hedging purposes. The Company does not currently
anticipate entering into interest rate swaps and/or similar
instruments.
The
Company's carrying values of cash, marketable securities, accounts receivable,
accounts payable and accrued expenses are a reasonable approximation of their
fair value.
The
Company enters into transactions denominated in U.S. Dollars, Hong Kong Dollars,
the Macao Pataca, the Chinese Renminbi, Euros and British Pounds. Fluctuations
in the U.S. dollar exchange rate against these currencies could significantly
impact the Company's consolidated results of operations.
The
Company believes that a change in interest rates of 1% or 2% would not have
a
material effect on the Company's consolidated statement of operations or balance
sheet.
Item
8.
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
See
the
consolidated financial statements listed in the accompanying Index to
Consolidated Financial Statements for the information required by this
item.
45
BEL
FUSE INC.
|
|||
INDEX
|
|||
Financial
Statements
|
Page
|
||
Report
of Independent Registered
|
|||
Public
Accounting Firm
|
F-1
|
||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of
|
|||
December
31, 2006 and 2005
|
F-2
- F-3
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for Each
|
|||
of
the Three Years in the Period Ended
|
|||
December
31, 2006
|
F-4
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders' Equity
|
|||
for
Each of the Three Years in the Period Ended
|
|||
December
31, 2006
|
F-5
- F-6
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for
|
|||
Each
of the Three Years in the Period Ended
|
|||
December
31, 2006
|
F-7
- F-9
|
||
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-10
- F-43
|
||
Selected
Quarterly Financial Data - Years Ended
|
|||
December
31, 2006 and 2005 (Unaudited)
|
F-44
|
46
REPORT
OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To
the
Board of Directors and Stockholders of Bel Fuse Inc.
Jersey
City, New Jersey
We
have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Bel Fuse Inc. and
subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows
for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2006. Our audits also
included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. We
also have audited management's assessment, included in the accompanying
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that
the
Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework issued
by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission.
The
Company's management is responsible for these financial statements and financial
statement schedule, for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over
financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and financial statement schedule, an opinion on
management's assessment, and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's
internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that
we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the
financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective
internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit of financial statements included examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation.
Our
audit
of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding
of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management's
assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of
internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinions.
A
company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by,
or
under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal
financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by
the
company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control
over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2)
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
Because
of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting,
including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of
controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented
or
detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods
are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.
In
our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Bel Fuse Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2006, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein. Also in our opinion, management's
assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects,
based on the criteria established in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework issued
by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Furthermore, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006,
based on the criteria established in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework issued
by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
As
discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company
adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 158,
“Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans - an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R),” effective
December 31, 2006 and SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment,” effective January
1, 2006.
As
discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has
restated its 2005 and 2004 earnings per share disclosures to present earning
per
share using the two-class method.
DELOITTE
& TOUCHE LLP
New
York,
New York
March
13,
2007
F-1
BEL
FUSE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|||||||
December
31,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Current
Assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
76,760,543
|
$
|
51,997,634
|
|||
Marketable
securities
|
15,576,212
|
38,463,108
|
|||||
Accounts
receivable - less allowance for doubtful
|
|||||||
accounts
of $1,087,000 and $1,107,000 at
|
|||||||
December
31, 2006 and 2005, respectively
|
43,765,750
|
39,304,984
|
|||||
Inventories
|
46,297,208
|
32,947,103
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current
|
|||||||
assets
|
1,382,807
|
1,691,017
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
1,665,857
|
-
|
|||||
Assets
held for sale
|
848,049
|
828,131
|
|||||
Total
Current Assets
|
186,296,426
|
165,231,977
|
|||||
Property,
plant and equipment - net
|
44,289,159
|
42,379,356
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
3,425,375
|
3,901,000
|
|||||
Intangible
assets - net
|
1,892,417
|
2,782,188
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
28,117,143
|
22,427,934
|
|||||
Prepaid
pension costs
|
-
|
1,655,362
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
4,476,990
|
3,678,100
|
|||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$
|
268,497,510
|
$
|
242,055,917
|
F-2
BEL
FUSE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|||||||
December
31,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|||||||
Current
Liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
17,244,937
|
$
|
14,560,827
|
|||
Accrued
expenses
|
12,713,417
|
10,667,558
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
-
|
1,412,000
|
|||||
Income
taxes payable
|
11,094,107
|
9,840,295
|
|||||
Dividends
payable
|
566,583
|
548,000
|
|||||
Total
Current Liabilities
|
41,619,044
|
37,028,680
|
|||||
Long-term
Liabilities:
|
|||||||
Minimum
pension obligation and
|
|||||||
unfunded
pension liability
|
4,728,286
|
3,450,688
|
|||||
Total
Long-term Liabilities
|
4,728,286
|
3,450,688
|
|||||
Total
Liabilities
|
46,347,330
|
40,479,368
|
|||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
|||||||
Stockholders'
Equity:
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock, no par value,
|
|||||||
authorized
1,000,000 shares;
|
|||||||
none
issued
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Class
A common stock, par value
|
|||||||
$.10
per share - authorized
|
|||||||
10,000,000
shares; outstanding
|
|||||||
2,702,677
and 2,702,677 shares, respectively
|
|||||||
(net
of 1,072,770 treasury shares)
|
270,268
|
270,268
|
|||||
Class
B common stock, par value
|
|||||||
$.10
per share - authorized
|
|||||||
30,000,000
shares; outstanding 9,167,665
|
|||||||
and
9,013,264 shares, respectively
|
|||||||
(net
of 3,218,310 treasury shares)
|
916,767
|
901,327
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
31,826,046
|
31,713,608
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
190,952,754
|
167,991,188
|
|||||
Deferred
stock-based compensation
|
-
|
(3,562,709
|
)
|
||||
Cumulative
other comprehensive
|
|||||||
income
(loss)
|
(1,815,655
|
)
|
4,262,867
|
||||
Total
Stockholders' Equity
|
222,150,180
|
201,576,549
|
|||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND
|
|||||||
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
$
|
268,497,510
|
$
|
242,055,917
|
F-3
BEL
FUSE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
||||||||||
Years
Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
|
||||||||||
Net
Sales
|
$
|
254,932,986
|
$
|
215,915,756
|
$
|
190,021,953
|
||||
Costs
and expenses:
|
||||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
192,985,004
|
156,146,724
|
132,776,304
|
|||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
37,800,403
|
33,151,672
|
31,301,722
|
|||||||
Casualty
loss
|
1,029,853
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Fixed
asset impairment
|
-
|
-
|
1,032,786
|
|||||||
231,815,260
|
189,298,396
|
165,110,812
|
||||||||
Income
from operations
|
23,117,726
|
26,617,360
|
24,911,141
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
(70,703
|
)
|
(324,802
|
)
|
(238,552
|
)
|
||||
Gain
on sale of marketable securities
|
5,149,794
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Interest
income
|
2,851,536
|
1,422,719
|
763,000
|
|||||||
Lawsuit
proceeds
|
-
|
-
|
2,935,000
|
|||||||
Earnings
before provision for income taxes
|
31,048,353
|
27,715,277
|
28,370,589
|
|||||||
Income
tax provision
|
5,845,000
|
7,482,000
|
3,649,000
|
|||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
25,203,353
|
$
|
20,233,277
|
$
|
24,721,589
|
||||
Earnings
per share (2005 and 2004, as
|
||||||||||
restated
- see Note 1)
|
||||||||||
Earnings
per Class A common share
|
||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
2.03
|
$
|
1.67
|
$
|
2.10
|
||||
Diluted
|
$
|
2.03
|
$
|
1.67
|
$
|
2.10
|
||||
Weighted
average Class A common shares
|
||||||||||
outstanding
- basic
|
2,702,677
|
2,702,677
|
2,702,677
|
|||||||
Weighted
average Class A common shares
|
||||||||||
outstanding
- diluted
|
2,702,677
|
2,702,677
|
2,702,677
|
|||||||
Earnings
per Class B common share
|
||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
2.16
|
$
|
1.79
|
$
|
2.22
|
||||
Diluted
|
$
|
2.15
|
$
|
1.77
|
$
|
2.16
|
||||
Weighted
average Class B common shares
|
||||||||||
outstanding
- basic
|
9,104,897
|
8,807,498
|
8,581,073
|
|||||||
Weighted
average Class B common shares
|
||||||||||
outstanding
- diluted
|
9,149,445
|
8,890,581
|
8,808,418
|
F-4
BEL
FUSE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
Compre-
|
|
|
|
Compre-
|
|
Class
A
|
|
Class
B
|
|
Additional
|
|
Stock-
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
hensive
|
|
Retained
|
|
hensive
|
|
Common
|
|
Common
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
Based
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Total
|
|
Income
|
|
Earnings
|
|
Income
(loss)
|
|
Stock
|
|
Stock
|
|
Capital
|
|
Compensation
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
January 1, 2004
|
$
|
146,854,953
|
$
|
127,406,693
|
$
|
979,576
|
$
|
270,167
|
$
|
846,069
|
$
|
17,352,448
|
$
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Exercise
of stock
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
options
|
3,891,266
|
101
|
19,990
|
3,871,175
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Tax
benefits arising
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
from
the disposition of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
non-qualified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
incentive
stock options
|
765,551
|
765,551
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
dividends declared on Class A
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
common
stock
|
(430,707
|
)
|
(430,707
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
dividends declared on Class B
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
common
stock
|
(1,748,292
|
)
|
(1,748,292
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Currency
translation
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
adjustment
|
386,257
|
$
|
386,257
|
386,257
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Change
in unrealized gain or
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
loss
on marketable securities
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
-net
of taxes
|
4,020,679
|
4,020,679
|
4,020,679
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
24,721,589
|
24,721,589
|
24,721,589
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
$
|
29,128,525
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2004
|
178,461,296
|
149,949,283
|
5,386,512
|
270,268
|
866,059
|
21,989,174
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||
Exercise
of stock
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
options
|
4,115,508
|
20,028
|
4,095,480
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax
benefits arising
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
from
the disposition of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
non-qualified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
incentive
stock options
|
429,802
|
429,802
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
dividends declared on Class A
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
common
stock
|
(430,940
|
)
|
(430,940
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
dividends declared on Class B
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
common
stock
|
(1,760,432
|
)
|
(1,760,432
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of restricted
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
common
stock
|
5,214,392
|
15,240
|
5,199,152
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred
stock-based
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
compensation
|
(3,742,004
|
)
|
(3,742,004
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Currency
translation
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
adjustment
|
(669,153
|
)
|
$
|
(669,153
|
)
|
(669,153
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Change
in unrealized gain or
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
loss
on marketable securities
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
-net
of taxes
|
(454,492
|
)
|
(454,492
|
)
|
(454,492
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
expense
|
179,295
|
179,295
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
20,233,277
|
20,233,277
|
20,233,277
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
$
|
19,109,632
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2005
|
201,576,549
|
167,991,188
|
4,262,867
|
270,268
|
901,327
|
31,713,608
|
(3,562,709
|
)
|
F-5
BEL
FUSE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
Compre-
|
|
|
|
Compre-
|
|
Class
A
|
|
Class
B
|
|
Additional
|
|
Stock-
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
hensive
|
|
Retained
|
|
hensive
|
|
Common
|
|
Common
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
Based
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Total
|
|
Income
|
|
Earnings
|
|
Income
(loss)
|
|
Stock
|
|
Stock
|
|
Capital
|
|
Compensation
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise
of stock
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
options
|
3,186,587
|
13,280
|
3,173,307
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax
benefits arising
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
from
the disposition of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
non-qualified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
incentive
stock options
|
336,456
|
336,456
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
dividends declared on Class A
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
common
stock
|
(430,940
|
)
|
(430,940
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
dividends declared on Class B
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
common
stock
|
(1,810,847
|
)
|
(1,810,847
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of restricted
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
common
stock
|
-
|
2,160
|
(2,160
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred
stock-based
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
compensation
|
(1,403,157
|
)
|
(1,403,157
|
)
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Currency
translation
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
adjustment
|
387,822
|
$
|
387,822
|
387,822
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Change
in unrealized gain or
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
loss
on marketable securities
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
-net
of taxes
|
(4,819,632
|
)
|
(4,819,632
|
)
|
(4,819,632
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
expense
|
1,570,701
|
1,570,701
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Adoption
of SFAS No. 123 (R)
|
-
|
(3,562,709
|
)
|
3,562,709
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Unfunded
SERP liability-net
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
of
taxes upon adoption of SFAS No. 158
|
(1,646,712
|
)
|
(1,646,712
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
25,203,353
|
25,203,353
|
25,203,353
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
$
|
20,771,543
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2006
|
$
|
222,150,180
|
$
|
190,952,754
|
$
|
(1,815,655
|
)
|
$
|
270,268
|
$
|
916,767
|
$
|
31,826,046
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||||
F-6
BEL
FUSE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
Years
Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
Cash
flows from operating
|
||||||||||
activities:
|
||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
25,203,353
|
$
|
20,233,277
|
$
|
24,721,589
|
||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net
|
||||||||||
income
to net cash provided
|
||||||||||
by
operating activities:
|
||||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
9,027,659
|
10,104,373
|
9,025,364
|
|||||||
Fixed
asset impairment
|
-
|
-
|
1,032,786
|
|||||||
Casualty
loss
|
1,029,853
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
1,570,701
|
248,000
|
-
|
|||||||
Excess
tax benefits from share-based
|
||||||||||
payment
arrangements
|
(336,456
|
)
|
||||||||
Gain
on sale of marketable securities
|
(5,149,794
|
)
|
||||||||
Other
|
678,664
|
1,464,000
|
1,238,000
|
|||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
(988,237
|
)
|
(3,602,000
|
)
|
(4,986,000
|
)
|
||||
Changes
in operating assets
|
||||||||||
and
liabilities (net of acquisitions)
|
(12,003,251
|
)
|
2,825,445
|
1,077,010
|
||||||
Net
Cash Provided by
|
||||||||||
Operating
Activities
|
19,032,492
|
31,273,095
|
32,108,749
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||||
Purchase
of property, plant
|
||||||||||
and
equipment - net of accruals
|
(9,364,444
|
)
|
(7,745,817
|
)
|
(6,578,658
|
)
|
||||
Purchase
of marketable
|
||||||||||
securities
|
(3,633,890
|
)
|
(17,998,601
|
)
|
(17,723,615
|
)
|
||||
Payment
of investment banking
|
||||||||||
advisory
fee
|
(300,000
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
||||||
Payment
for acquisitions - net of
|
||||||||||
cash
acquired
|
(6,960,974
|
)
|
(20,807,083
|
)
|
(353,464
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from repayment
|
||||||||||
by
contractors
|
-
|
-
|
29,000
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from sale of
|
||||||||||
marketable
securities
|
24,489,966
|
1,621,603
|
6,345,595
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from sale of
|
||||||||||
building
|
-
|
252,587
|
-
|
|||||||
Net
Cash Provided by (Used in)
|
||||||||||
Investing
Activities
|
4,230,658
|
(44,677,311
|
)
|
(18,281,142
|
)
|
F-7
BEL
FUSE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
|
||||||||||
Years
Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
Cash
flows from financing
|
||||||||||
activities:
|
||||||||||
Proceeds
from borrowings
|
-
|
12,000,000
|
-
|
|||||||
Loan
repayments
|
-
|
(19,360,694
|
)
|
(2,000,000
|
)
|
|||||
Proceeds
from exercise of
|
||||||||||
stock
options
|
3,186,587
|
4,115,508
|
3,891,266
|
|||||||
Dividends
paid to common
|
||||||||||
shareholders
|
(2,223,204
|
)
|
(2,183,371
|
)
|
(2,168,258
|
)
|
||||
Excess
tax benefits from share-based
|
||||||||||
payment
arrangements
|
336,456
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Net
Cash Provided by (Used In)
|
||||||||||
Financing
Activities
|
1,299,839
|
(5,428,557
|
)
|
(276,992
|
)
|
|||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash
|
199,920
|
(367,484
|
)
|
186,124
|
||||||
Net
Increase (decrease) in
|
||||||||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
|
24,762,909
|
(19,200,257
|
)
|
13,736,739
|
||||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
|
||||||||||
-
beginning of year
|
51,997,634
|
71,197,891
|
57,461,152
|
|||||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
|
||||||||||
-
end of year
|
$
|
76,760,543
|
$
|
51,997,634
|
$
|
71,197,891
|
||||
Changes
in operating assets
|
||||||||||
and
liabilities (net of acquisitions) consist of:
|
||||||||||
Increase
in accounts
|
||||||||||
receivable
|
$
|
(4,280,411
|
)
|
$
|
(2,638,200
|
)
|
$
|
(2,671,513
|
)
|
|
Increase
in inventories
|
(13,500,956
|
)
|
(1,145,242
|
)
|
(2,774,275
|
)
|
||||
Decrease
(increase) in prepaid
|
||||||||||
expenses
and other
|
||||||||||
current
assets
|
288,292
|
809,821
|
(700,243
|
)
|
||||||
Increase
in other assets
|
(498,892
|
)
|
(383,980
|
)
|
(738,878
|
)
|
||||
Increase
in accounts payable
|
2,657,504
|
3,629,923
|
1,299,301
|
|||||||
Increase
in income taxes payable
|
1,590,268
|
3,071,828
|
6,946,523
|
|||||||
Increase
(decrease) in
|
||||||||||
accrued
expenses
|
1,740,944
|
(518,705
|
)
|
(283,905
|
)
|
|||||
$
|
(12,003,251
|
)
|
$
|
2,825,445
|
$
|
1,077,010
|
F-8
BEL
FUSE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Concluded)
|
Year
Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
Supplementary
information:
|
||||||||||
Cash
paid during the year for:
|
||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
$
|
4,451,000
|
$
|
6,578,000
|
$
|
2,128,000
|
||||
Interest
|
$
|
71,000
|
$
|
325,000
|
$
|
239,000
|
||||
Details
of acquisitions:
|
||||||||||
Fair
value of assets acquired (excluding
|
||||||||||
cash
acquired of $311,856 in 2005)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
6,077,138
|
$
|
-
|
||||
Intangibles
|
446,571
|
2,657,518
|
353,464
|
|||||||
Goodwill
|
6,000,000
|
12,546,080
|
-
|
|||||||
6,446,571
|
21,280,736
|
353,464
|
||||||||
Amounts
paid (held back) on
|
||||||||||
acquisition
payment
|
514,403
|
(473,653
|
)
|
-
|
||||||
Cash
paid for acquisitions
|
$
|
6,960,974
|
$
|
20,807,083
|
$
|
353,464
|
F-9
BEL
FUSE
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
THE
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
1. DESCRIPTION
OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Bel
Fuse
Inc. and subsidiaries operate in one industry with three geographic reporting
segments and are engaged in the design, manufacture and sale of products used
in
local area networking, telecommunication, business equipment and consumer
electronic applications. The Company manages its operations geographically
through its three reporting units: North America, Asia and Europe. Sales are
predominantly in North America, Europe and Asia.
PRINCIPLES
OF CONSOLIDATION - The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
wholly owned subsidiaries including the businesses acquired since their
respective dates of acquisition. All intercompany transactions and balances
have
been eliminated.
USE
OF
ESTIMATES - The
preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
CASH
EQUIVALENTS - Cash
equivalents include short-term investments in U.S. treasury bills and commercial
paper with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased. At
December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, cash equivalents approximated
$35,843,000 and $13,444,000, respectively.
MARKETABLE
SECURITIES - The
Company classifies its marketable equity securities as "available for sale",
and
accordingly, reflects unrealized gains and losses, net of deferred income taxes,
as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income.
The
fair
values of marketable securities are based on quoted market prices. Realized
gains or losses from the sale of marketable securities are based on the specific
identification method.
F-10
ACQUISITION
EXPENSES - The
Company capitalizes all direct costs associated with proposed acquisitions.
If
the proposed acquisitions are consummated, such costs will be included as a
component of the overall cost of the acquisition. Such costs are expensed at
such time as the Company deems the consummation of a proposed acquisition to
be
unsuccessful.
FOREIGN
CURRENCY TRANSLATION - The
functional currency for some foreign operations is the local currency. Assets
and liabilities of foreign operations are translated at balance sheet date
rates
of exchange and income, expense and cash flow items are translated at the
average exchange rate for the period. Translation adjustments are recorded
in
Other Comprehensive Income. The U.S. Dollar is used as the functional currency
for certain foreign operations that conduct their business in U.S. Dollars.
Realized foreign currency (losses) gains were ($201,000), $27,000 and $54,000
for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and have
been expensed as a component of selling, general and administrative expense
in
the consolidated statements of operations.
CONCENTRATION
OF CREDIT RISK - Financial
instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit
risk consist principally of accounts receivable and temporary cash investments.
The Company grants credit to customers that are primarily original equipment
manufacturers and to subcontractors of original equipment manufacturers based
on
an evaluation of the customer's financial condition, without requiring
collateral. Exposure to losses on receivables is principally dependent on each
customer's financial condition. The Company controls its exposure to credit
risk
through credit approvals, credit limits and monitoring procedures and
establishes allowances for anticipated losses.
The
Company places its temporary cash investments with quality financial
institutions and commercial issuers of short-term paper and, by policy, limits
the amount of credit exposure in any one financial instrument.
INVENTORIES
- Inventories
are stated at the lower of weighted average cost or market.
REVENUE
RECOGNITION -The
Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the guidance contained in SEC
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, "Revenue Recognition in Financial
Statements". Revenue
is recognized when the product has been delivered and title and risk of loss
have
passed
to the customer, collection of the resulting receivable is deemed reasonably
assured by management, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists and the
sales price is fixed and determinable. Substantially all of the Company's
shipments are FCA (free carrier) which provides for title to pass upon delivery
to the customer's freight carrier. Some product is shipped DDP/DDU with title
passing when the product arrives at the customer's dock.
F-11
For
certain customers, the Company provides consigned inventory, either at the
customer’s facility or at a third party warehouse. Sales of consigned inventory
are recorded when the customer withdraws inventory from consignment.
During
all periods in 2006, 2005 and 2004, inventory on consignment was
immaterial.
The
Company typically has a twelve-month warranty policy for workmanship defects.
Warranty returns have historically averaged at or below 1% of annual net sales.
The Company establishes warranty reserves when a warranty issue becomes
known,
as
warranty claims have historically been immaterial. No general reserves for
warranties have been established.
The
Company is not contractually obligated to accept returns except for defective
product or in instances where the product does not meet the customer's quality
specifications. However, the Company may permit its customers to return product
for other reasons. In these instances, the Company would generally require
a
significant cancellation penalty payment by the customer. The Company estimates
such returns, where applicable, based upon management's evaluation of historical
experience, market acceptance of products produced and known negotiations with
customers. Such estimates are deducted from gross sales and provided for at
the
time revenue is recognized.
GOODWILL
-The
Company tests goodwill for impairment annually during the fourth quarter, using
a fair value approach at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit is an
operating segment or one level below an operating segment for which discrete
financial information is available and reviewed regularly by management. Assets
and liabilities of the Company have been assigned to the reporting units to
the
extent that they are employed in or are considered a liability related to the
operations of the reporting unit and were considered in determining the fair
value of the reporting unit.
DEPRECIATION
- Property,
plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Depreciation and amortization are calculated primarily using
the
declining-balance method for machinery and equipment and the straight-line
method for buildings and improvements over their estimated useful lives.
F-12
INCOME
TAXES - The
Company accounts for income taxes using an asset and liability approach under
which deferred income taxes are recognized by applying enacted tax rates
applicable to future years to the differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts and the tax bases of reported assets and
liabilities.
For
that
portion of foreign earnings that have not been repatriated, an income tax
provision has not been recorded for U.S. federal income taxes on the
undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries as such earnings are intended
to
be permanently reinvested in those operations. Such earnings would become
taxable in the United States upon the sale or liquidation of these foreign
subsidiaries or upon the repatriation of earnings. See Note 8 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
The
principal items giving rise to deferred taxes are unrealized gains on marketable
securities available for sale, the use of accelerated depreciation methods
for
machinery and equipment, timing differences between book and tax amortization
of
intangible assets and goodwill and certain expenses including the SERP which
have been deducted for financial reporting purposes which are not currently
deductible for income tax purposes.
EARNINGS
PER SHARE (RESTATED) -
Subsequent to the issuance of its Consolidated Financial Statements for the
year
ended December 31, 2005, the Company determined that the method it uses to
report earnings per share should utilize the two-class method, displaying
earnings per share separately for both Class A and Class B common stock, rather
than only one class as previously reported. The two-class method is an earnings
allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common
stock according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed
earnings. The Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, states that
Class B common shares are entitled to dividends at least 5% greater than
dividends paid to Class A common shares,
resulting in the two-class method of computing earnings per share. In computing
earnings per share, the Company has allocated actual dividends declared to
Class
A and Class B based on amounts actually declared. In computing earnings per
share, 5% more of the undistributed earnings have been allocated to Class B
shares than to the Class A shares on a per share basis. Previously, all
shareholders were assumed to share in the earnings equally. As a result, the
earnings per share disclosures in the accompanying Consolidated Financial
Statements for the years ended December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, as
well as for interim periods within 2006 and 2005 (see Unaudited
Condensed Quarterly Financial Data), have been restated to reflect the two-class
method of computing earnings per share. Basic earnings per common share are
computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share, for
each class of common stock, are computed by dividing net earnings by the
weighted average number of common shares and potential common shares outstanding
during the period. Potential common shares used in computing diluted earnings
per share relate to stock options for Class A and B common shares which, if
exercised, would have a dilutive effect on earnings per share.
F-13
Restatement
of Earnings Per Share
|
|||||||
As
Previously
|
|||||||
Year
Ended
|
Reported
|
As
Restated
|
|||||
December
31, 2005
|
|||||||
Basic
|
$
|
1.76
|
|||||
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.75
|
||||
Class
A - Basic
|
$
|
1.67
|
|||||
Class
B- Basic
|
$
|
1.79
|
|||||
Class
A- Diluted
|
$
|
1.67
|
|||||
Class
B - Diluted
|
$
|
1.77
|
|||||
Year
Ended
|
|||||||
December
31, 2004
|
|||||||
Basic
|
$
|
2.19
|
|||||
Diluted
|
$
|
2.15
|
|||||
Class
A - Basic
|
$
|
2.10
|
|||||
Class
B- Basic
|
$
|
2.22
|
|||||
Class
A- Diluted
|
$
|
2.10
|
|||||
Class
B - Diluted
|
$
|
2.16
|
|||||
The
previously reported weighted average shares outstanding for the years ended
December 31, 2005 and 2004 were as follows:
2005
|
2004
|
||||||
Basic
|
11,510,175
|
11,283,750
|
|||||
Diluted
|
11,593,258
|
11,551,095
|
The
following table includes a reconciliation of shares used in the calculation
of
basic and diluted earnings per share for Class A and Class B common
shares:
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
Class
A Common Shares
|
||||||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding - basic (as restated)
|
2,702,677
|
2,702,677
|
2,702,677
|
|||||||
Dilutive
impact of stock options and
|
||||||||||
unvested
restricted stock awards
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Weighted
average shares oustanding - diluted (as restated)
|
2,702,677
|
2,702,677
|
2,702,677
|
|||||||
Class
B Common Shares
|
||||||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding - basic (as restated)
|
9,104,897
|
8,807,498
|
8,581,073
|
|||||||
Dilutive
impact of stock options and
|
||||||||||
unvested
restricted stock awards
|
44,548
|
83,083
|
227,345
|
|||||||
Weighted
average shares oustanding - diluted (as restated)
|
9,149,445
|
8,890,581
|
8,808,418
|
During
the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, 14,000, 20,000
and 24,000 outstanding options were not included in the foregoing computations
for Class B common shares because they were antidilutive.
F-14
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
- The
Company has one stock-based compensation plan under which both incentive
stock-options and restricted stock awards are granted to employees and
directors. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company accounts for stock-based
compensation under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No.
123
(R), "Share-Based Payment". The Company adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified
prospective method. Under modified prospective application, this SFAS applies
to
new awards and to awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after the required
effective date. Additionally, compensation costs for the portion of the awards
for which the requisite service has not been rendered that are outstanding
as of
the required effective date are being recognized as the requisite service is
rendered after the required effective date. The compensation cost for the
portion
of awards is based on the grant-date fair value of those awards as calculated
for either recognition or pro forma disclosures under SFAS 123. Changes to
the
grant-date fair value of equity awards granted before the required effective
date of this Statement are precluded. The compensation cost for those earlier
awards is attributed to periods beginning on or after the required effective
date of this SFAS using the attribution method that was used under SFAS 123,
except that the method of recognizing forfeitures only as they occur was not
continued. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock option
grants issued to employees in accordance with Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 25 "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees", and had adopted
the
disclosure only requirements of SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation", as amended by SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation-Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No.
123”.
As such, for periods prior to January 1, 2006, the Company presents pro forma
net earnings and earnings per share as if the fair-value-based method of
accounting had been applied under SFAS No. 123.
In
December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation-Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No.
123”.
SFAS No. 148 provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change
to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee
compensation. It also requires disclosure in both annual and interim financial
statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation
and the effect of the method used on reported results. The Company adopted the
disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148 beginning with the year ended December
31,
2002. The Company grants stock options with exercise prices at fair market
value
at the date of the grant. The Company has accounted for stock-based employee
compensation under the recognition and measurement principle of APB Opinion
No.
25 and related interpretations through December 31, 2005.
Prior
to
January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS
No.
123. Had compensation cost for the Company's stock option plan been determined
based on the fair value at the grant date for awards in 2005 and 2004 consistent
with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, the Company's net earnings and earnings
per
share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below.
F-15
Years
Ended December 31,
|
|||||||
2005
|
2004
|
||||||
Net
earnings - as reported
|
$
|
20,233,277
|
$
|
24,721,589
|
|||
Add:
Stock-based compensation
|
|||||||
expense
included in net income,
|
|||||||
net
of taxes, as reported
|
179,295
|
-
|
|||||
Deduct:
Total stock-based
|
|||||||
employee
compensation expense
|
|||||||
determined
under fair value based
|
|||||||
method
for all awards,
|
|||||||
net
of taxes
|
(643,472
|
)
|
(1,125,427
|
)
|
|||
Net
earnings- pro forma
|
$
|
19,769,100
|
$
|
23,596,162
|
|||
Earnings
per Class A common share -
|
|||||||
basic-as
reported
|
$
|
1.67
|
$
|
2.10
|
|||
Earnings
per Class A common share -
|
|||||||
basic-pro
forma
|
$
|
1.63
|
$
|
2.00
|
|||
Earnings
per Class A common share -
|
|||||||
diluted-as
reported
|
$
|
1.67
|
$
|
2.10
|
|||
Earnings
per Class A common share -
|
|||||||
diluted-pro
forma
|
$
|
1.63
|
$
|
2.00
|
|||
Earnings
per Class B common share -
|
|||||||
basic-as
reported
|
$
|
1.79
|
$
|
2.22
|
|||
Earnings
per Class B common share -
|
|||||||
basic-pro
forma
|
$
|
1.74
|
$
|
2.12
|
|||
Earnings
per Class B common share -
|
|||||||
diluted-as
reported
|
$
|
1.77
|
$
|
2.16
|
|||
Earnings
per Class B common share -
|
|||||||
diluted-pro
forma
|
$
|
1.73
|
$
|
2.07
|
The
fair
value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average
assumptions used for grants in 2004: dividends yield of 0.9%, expected
volatility of 35% for Class B; risk-free interest rate of 5% and expected lives
of 5 years. No options were granted during the years ended December 31, 2006
and
2005.
RESEARCH
AND DEVELOPMENT - Research
and development costs are expensed as incurred, and are included in cost of
sales. Generally all research and development is performed internally for the
benefit of the Company. The Company does not perform such activities for others.
Research and development costs include salaries, building maintenance and
utilities, rents, materials, administration costs and miscellaneous other items.
Research and development expenses for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005
and 2004 amounted to $6.6 million, $7.3 million and $7.3 million,
respectively.
EVALUATION
OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS - The
Company reviews property and equipment for impairment whenever events or changes
in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable in
accordance with guidance in SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” If the carrying value of the long-lived asset
exceeds the present value of the related estimated future cash flows, the asset
would be adjusted to its fair value and an impairment loss would be charged
to
operations in the period identified.
F-16
FAIR
VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
- For
financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, marketable
securities, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, the
carrying amount approximates fair value because of the short maturities of
such
instruments.
RECLASSIFICATIONS
-
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform
to
the current year presentation, principally within cash flows from operating
activities in the 2005 and 2004 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and in
the
detailed disclosures within the footnotes pertaining to Property, Plant and
Equipment and Income Taxes.
F-17
NEW
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 158, “Employers’
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Post Retirement Plans”, an
amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R). SFAS 158 requires
employers to recognize their defined benefit plans’ overfunded or underfunded
status in their balance sheets, requires employers to measure plan assets and
plan obligations as of the balance sheet date, immediately recognize any
remaining transition obligation currently being deferred, and recognize
actuarial gains and losses through other comprehensive income. The statement
is
effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006. For additional
information regarding the accounting treatment and effect on the Consolidated
Balance Sheet of SFAS No. 158,
see Note
12 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”, which
enhances existing guidance for measuring assets and liabilities using fair
value. This Standard provides a single definition of fair value, together with
a
framework for measuring it, and requires additional disclosure about the use
of
fair value to measure assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007,
and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not believe
that
SFAS No. 157 will have a material impact on its financial
statements.
In
September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff
Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year
Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
Statements” (“SAB No. 108”). SAB No. 108 provides guidance on the consideration
of effects of the prior year misstatements in quantifying current year
misstatements for the purpose of a materiality assessment. We adopted SAB No.
108 in the fourth quarter of 2006 and adoption of SAB No. 108 did not impact
our
consolidated financial results.
In
July
2006, FASB issued Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes” ("FIN 48"). The interpretation requires a two step approach for
recognizing and measuring tax benefits based on a recognition threshold of
“more
likely than not”. The FASB also requires explicit disclosures about
uncertainties in tax positions including a detailed rollforward of tax benefits
that do not qualify for financial statement recognition. The adoption of FIN
48
is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. While the
Company’s analysis of the impact of this Interpretation is not yet complete, we
do not anticipate it will have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial
Statements or with any of the Company’s debt covenants.
F-18
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159 (“SFAS 159”) “The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”, providing companies with an
option to report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value. The
Standard’s objective is to reduce both complexity in accounting for financial
instruments and the volatility in earnings caused by measuring related assets
and liabilities differently. It also requires entities to display the fair
value
of those assets and liabilities for which the Company has chosen to use fair
value on the face of the balance sheet. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the
impact of the adoption of this Statement on its financial statements.
F-19
2.
|
ACQUISITIONS
|
On
June
30, 2005, the Company acquired the common stock of Netwatch s.r.o., located
in
Prague, the Czech Republic, for approximately $1.9 million in cash,
of which
$0.5 million was due to the sellers and was paid by the Company during June
2006. Netwatch s.r.o. is a designer and manufacturer of high-performance fiber
optic and copper cable assemblies for data and telecommunication applications.
Approximately $1.0 million of goodwill arose from the transaction which
goodwill
is
included in the Company’s European reporting unit.
The
acquisition has been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting
and,
accordingly, the results of operation of Netwatch s.r.o. have been included
in
the Company’s consolidated financial statements from June 30, 2005.
There
was
no in process research and development acquired as part of this
acquisition.
On
March
22, 2005, the Company acquired the common stock of Galaxy Power Inc. ("Galaxy"),
located in Westborough, Massachusetts, for approximately $19.0 million in cash
including transaction costs of approximately $0.4 million. Galaxy is a designer
and manufacturer of high-density DC-DC converters for distributed power and
telecommunication applications. The purchase price has been allocated to both
tangible and intangible assets and liabilities based on estimated fair values
after considering an independent formal appraisal. Approximately $11.5 million
of goodwill and $2.6 million of identifiable intangible assets arose from the
transaction and are included in the Company’s North American reporting unit. The
identifiable intangible assets and related deferred tax liabilities are being
amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives.
The
acquisition has been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting
and,
accordingly, the results of operations of Galaxy have been included in the
Company's consolidated financial statements from March 22, 2005.
There
was
no in process research and development acquired as part of this
acquisition.
See
Note
3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of E-Power
and
Current Concepts earn out payments in 2006.
F-20
The
following unaudited pro forma summary results of operations assume that Galaxy
and Netwatch s.r.o. had been acquired as of January 1, 2004 (in thousands,
except per share data):
Years
Ended
|
|||||||
December
31,
|
|||||||
2005
|
2004
|
||||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
221,227
|
$
|
212,331
|
|||
Net
earnings
|
20,026
|
25,419
|
|||||
Earnings
per share - diluted
|
|||||||
Class
A
|
1.65
|
2.14
|
|||||
Class
B
|
1.75
|
2.23
|
The
information above is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations
that would have occurred if the acquisitions had been consummated as of January
1, 2004.
Such
information should not be construed as a representation of the future results
of
operations of the Company.
A
condensed combined balance sheet of the assets and liabilities of Galaxy and
Netwatch s.r.o., as of their acquisition dates is as follows:
Cash
|
$
|
311,856
|
||
Accounts
receivable
|
3,687,331
|
|||
Inventories
|
2,862,571
|
|||
Prepaid
expenses
|
96,120
|
|||
Income
taxes receivable
|
5,488
|
|||
Property,
plant and
|
||||
equipment
|
1,545,526
|
|||
Other
assets
|
32,083
|
|||
Deferred
tax asset
|
1,392,850
|
|||
Goodwill
|
11,876,080
|
|||
Intangible
assets
|
2,630,000
|
|||
Notes
payable
|
(860,694
|
)
|
||
Accounts
payable
|
(2,129,165
|
)
|
||
Accrued
expenses
|
(386,961
|
)
|
||
Net
assets acquired
|
$
|
21,063,085
|
F-21
3.
|
GOODWILL
AND OTHER INTANGIBLES
|
Goodwill
represents the excess of the purchase price and related acquisition costs over
the value assigned to the net tangible and other intangible assets with finite
lives acquired in a business acquisition.
Effective
January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets". Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill and intangible assets deemed
to
have indefinite lives are no longer amortized, but are subject to, at a minimum,
an annual impairment test. If the carrying value of goodwill or intangible
assets exceeds its fair market value, an impairment loss would be recorded.
Other
intangibles include patents, product information, covenants not-to-compete
and
supply agreements. Amounts assigned to these intangibles have been determined
by
management. Management considered a number of factors in determining the
allocations, including valuations and independent appraisals. Other intangibles
are being amortized over 1 to 10 years. Amortization expense was $1,840,000,
$2,567,000 and $1,299,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
Under
the
terms of the E-Power LTD (“E-Power”) and Current Concepts, Inc. (“Current
Concepts”) acquisition agreements of May 11, 2001, the Company was required to
make contingent purchase price payments up to an aggregate of $7.6 million
should the acquired companies attain specified related sales levels. E-Power
was
to
be paid
$2.0 million in contingent purchase price payments if sales reached
$15.0
million and an additional $4.0 million if sales reached
$25.0
million on a cumulative basis through May 2007. During January 2006, the $2.0
million of contingent purchase price consideration was earned by
E-Power and
during
February
2006, E-Power was paid $2.0 million in contingent purchase price
payments.
During
September 2006, an
additional $4.0 million was
earned
when
sales reached $25.0 million on a cumulative basis
and,
as
a
result, $4.0 million was paid in November 2006, and accounted for as additional
purchase price and as an increase to goodwill. No additional payments will
be
made under the E-Power agreement. Current Concepts is
to
be paid
16% of the first $10.0 million in sales through May 2007. This $10 million
benchmark was reached during the second quarter of 2006 and therefore no
additional payments will be made. During the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005
and 2004, the Company paid approximately $447,000, $529,000 and $354,000,
respectively, in contingent purchase price payments to Current Concepts. The
contingent purchase price payments to Current Concepts have been accounted
for
as additional purchase price and as an increase to
covenants
not to compete within intangible assets.
F-22
The
changes in the carrying value of goodwill classified by geographic reporting
units, net of accumulated depreciation, for the years ended December 31, 2006
and 2005 are as follows:
Total
|
|
Asia
|
|
North
America
|
|
Europe
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
Balance,
January 1, 2005
|
$
|
9,881,854
|
$
|
6,407,435
|
$
|
2,869,092
|
$
|
605,327
|
|||||
Goodwill
allocation
|
|||||||||||||
related
to acquisitions
|
12,546,080
|
-
|
11,543,846
|
1,002,234
|
|||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2005
|
22,427,934
|
6,407,435
|
14,412,938
|
1,607,561
|
|||||||||
Goodwill
allocation
|
|||||||||||||
related
to acquisitions
|
6,000,000
|
6,000,000
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Purchase price adjustment - reclassification to intangible | |||||||||||||
assets
|
(670,000
|
)
|
-
|
(670,000
|
)
|
-
|
|||||||
Other
purchase price and foreign
|
|||||||||||||
exchange
adjustments
|
359,209
|
-
|
323,529
|
35,680
|
|||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2006
|
$
|
28,117,143
|
$
|
12,407,435
|
$
|
14,066,467
|
$
|
1,643,241
|
The
components of intangible assets other than goodwill by geographic reporting
unit
are as follows:
December
31, 2006
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
Asia
|
North
America
|
|||||||||||||||||
Gross
Carrying
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Gross
Carrying
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Gross
Carrying
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Amount
|
|
Amortization
|
|
Amount
|
|
Amortization
|
|
Amount
|
|
Amortization
|
|||||||
Patents
and Product
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Information
|
$
|
2,935,000
|
$
|
2,250,648
|
$
|
2,653,000
|
$
|
2,044,186
|
$
|
282,000
|
$
|
206,462
|
|||||||
Customer
relationships
|
1,830,000
|
648,125
|
-
|
-
|
1,830,000
|
648,125
|
|||||||||||||
Covenants
not-to-compete
|
5,299,998
|
5,273,808
|
4,499,998
|
4,499,998
|
800,000
|
773,810
|
|||||||||||||
$
|
10,064,998
|
$
|
8,172,581
|
$
|
7,152,998
|
$
|
6,544,184
|
$
|
2,912,000
|
$
|
1,628,397
|
||||||||
December
31, 2005
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
Asia
|
North
America
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Gross
Carrying
|
Accumulated
|
Gross
Carrying
|
Accumulated
|
Gross
Carrying
|
Accumulated
|
|||||||||||||
|
Amount
|
Amortization
|
Amount
|
Amortization
|
Amount
|
Amortization
|
|||||||||||||
Patents
and Product
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Information
|
$
|
2,935,000
|
$
|
1,812,853
|
$
|
2,653,000
|
$
|
1,634,566
|
$
|
282,000
|
$
|
178,287
|
|||||||
Customer
relationships
|
1,160,000
|
178,833
|
-
|
-
|
1,160,000
|
178,833
|
|||||||||||||
Covenants
not-to-compete
|
5,021,034
|
4,342,160
|
4,221,034
|
3,813,589
|
800,000
|
528,571
|
|||||||||||||
$
|
9,116,034
|
$
|
6,333,846
|
$
|
6,874,034
|
$
|
5,448,155
|
$
|
2,242,000
|
$
|
885,691
|
F-23
Estimated
amortization expense for intangible assets for the next five years is as
follows:
Estimated
|
||||
Year
Ending
|
Amortization
|
|||
December
31,
|
Expense
|
|||
2007
|
$
|
809,277
|
||
2008
|
525,939
|
|||
2009
|
422,296
|
|||
2010
|
120,986
|
|||
2011
|
13,919
|
Amortization
Period - 2006
|
||
Weighted
Average
|
||
Intangible
Asset
|
Estimated
Life
|
|
Patents
and Product Information
|
2.14
years
|
|
Customer
Relationships
|
2.2
years
|
|
Covenants
Not-to-Compete
|
.2
years
|
The
weighted average amortization period of the Company’s intangible assets at
December 31, 2006 is 2.1 years.
4. MARKETABLE
SECURITIES
The
Company has cumulatively acquired a total of 5,874,919 shares, or approximately
6%
of the
outstanding shares,
of the
common stock of Toko, Inc. (“Toko”) at a total purchase price of $18.0 million.
Toko had a market capitalization of approximately $255 million as of December
31, 2006. These shares are reflected on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet
as marketable securities. These marketable securities are considered to be
available for sale under SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in
Debt and Equity Securities”. Thus, as of December 31, 2006, the Company has
recorded an unrealized loss, net of income tax benefit, of approximately $1.5
million which is included in accumulated other comprehensive income in
stockholders’ equity. The Company’s investment in Toko has been in an unrealized
loss position for less than twelve months. As a result of the volatility of
the
Toko share price over the last year, management believes that the investment
in
Toko is not other-than-temporarily impaired. In connection with this
transaction, the Company is obligated to pay an investment banker’s advisory fee
to a third party of 20% of the appreciation in the stock of Toko, or $1 million,
whichever is lower. During 2006, $300,000 was prepaid against this obligation.
As of December 31, 2006, the Company has not accrued any additional fees to
the
investment banker as the Toko stock is at an unrealized loss position.
The
Company acquired a total of 2,037,500 shares of the common stock of Artesyn
Technologies, Inc. (“Artesyn”) at a total purchase price of $16,331,469. On
April 28, 2006, Artesyn was acquired by Emerson Network Power for $11.00 per
share in cash. During the second quarter of 2006, in connection with the
Company's sale of its Artesyn common stock, the Company recognized a gain of
approximately $5.2 million, net of investment banker’s advisory fees of
$850,000. The Company accrued bonuses of $1.0 million in connection with the
gain. For financial statement presentation purposes, the $1.0 million bonus
was
classified within selling, general and administrative expenses ($723,000) and
cost of sales ($277,000) and was paid to key employees during January 2007.
F-24
At
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, marketable securities have a cost
of
approximately $18,031,000 and $32,893,000, an estimated fair value of
approximately $15,576,000 and $38,463,000 and gross unrealized (losses) gains
of
approximately $(2,455,000) and $5,570,000. Included in other assets at December
31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 are marketable securities designated for
utilization in accordance with the Company’s SERP plan with a cost of
approximately $3,765,000 and $2,353,000, respectively and an estimated fair
value of approximately $4,117,000 and $2,537,000, respectively. Such unrealized
net (losses) gains are included, net of tax (benefit) expense, in other
comprehensive income.
5.
|
INVENTORIES
|
The
components of inventories are as follows:
December
31,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Raw
materials
|
$
|
24,374,438
|
$
|
19,342,703
|
|||
Work
in progress
|
3,531,148
|
2,515,174
|
|||||
Finished
goods
|
18,391,622
|
11,089,226
|
|||||
$
|
46,297,208
|
$
|
32,947,103
|
6.
|
IMPAIRMENT,
CASUALTY LOSSES AND LAWSUIT
PROCEEDS
|
Impairment
Loss
During
the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company wrote down fixed assets,
principally machinery and equipment, with a net book value of $1,033,000 at
its
Far East manufacturing facilities. The Company considered these fixed assets
to
be surplus equipment which was replaced by equipment with more advanced
technology.
Casualty
Loss
The
Company incurred a $1.0 million pre-tax casualty loss as a result of a fire
at
its leased manufacturing facility in the Dominican Republic for raw materials
and equipment in excess of estimated insurance proceeds. The production at
this
facility was substantially restored during July 2006.
Lawsuit
Proceeds
During
the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company settled an arbitration proceeding
related to a 1998 acquisition. The Company received $2,935,000 (net of $65,000
of related legal expenses incurred during the period) pursuant to that
settlement.
F-25
7. PROPERTY,
PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property,
plant and equipment consist of the following:
December
31,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Land
|
$
|
3,584,522
|
$
|
3,570,380
|
|||
Buildings
and improvements
|
25,385,367
|
24,509,146
|
|||||
Machinery
and equipment
|
60,745,740
|
73,855,613
|
|||||
89,715,629
|
101,935,139
|
||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
45,426,471
|
59,555,783
|
|||||
$
|
44,289,159
|
$
|
42,379,356
|
Depreciation
expense for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $7,188,000,
$7,537,000 and $7,726,000, respectively.
On
July
15, 2004, the Company entered into an agreement for the sale of a certain parcel
of land located in Jersey City, New Jersey. The sales agreement is subject
to a
due diligence period by the buyer. The sales agreement expired during January
2006. The buyer and seller are continuing to negotiate about certain
environmental matters among themselves and with the State of New Jersey. The
seller and buyer are aware that a portion of the property may be subject to
tidelands claims by the State of New Jersey. Additionally, the Company is
obligated for environmental remediation costs of up to $350,000. As of December
31, 2006, the Company had also paid $247,000 of legal, site testing and State
of
New Jersey Environmental Protection Agency Fees. As these costs are incurred,
the Company has
capitalized
them on
the Company's consolidated balance sheet as assets held for sale. The Company
has classified the asset as held for sale with a net book value of approximately
$848,000 on the Company's consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2006 and
expects to sell the property during the first half of 2007.
8. INCOME
TAXES
The
provision for income taxes consists of the following. All amounts are in
thousands of dollars.
Years
Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
Current:
|
||||||||||
Federal
|
$
|
4,784
|
$
|
4,590
|
$
|
3,524
|
||||
Foreign
|
1,619
|
6,250
|
5,234
|
|||||||
State
|
430
|
244
|
(123
|
)
|
||||||
6,833
|
11,084
|
8,635
|
||||||||
Deferred:
|
||||||||||
Federal
and state
|
(928
|
)
|
(1,420
|
)
|
(1,586
|
)
|
||||
Foreign
|
(60
|
)
|
(2,182
|
)
|
(3,400
|
)
|
||||
(988
|
)
|
(3,602
|
)
|
(4,986
|
)
|
|||||
$
|
5,845
|
$
|
7,482
|
$
|
3,649
|
F-26
A
reconciliation of taxes on income computed at the federal statutory rate to
amounts provided is as follows. All amounts are in thousands of
dollars.
Years
Ended December 31,
|
||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
Tax
provision
|
||||||||||
computed
at the Federal
|
||||||||||
statutory
rate of 34%
|
$
|
10,556
|
$
|
9,423
|
$
|
9,646
|
||||
Increase
(decrease) in
|
||||||||||
taxes
resulting from:
|
||||||||||
Benefit
relating to tax rate differential on foreign
|
||||||||||
earnings
to be repatriated in 2005-net
|
-
|
-
|
(1,017
|
)
|
||||||
Repatriation
of foreign earnings
|
||||||||||
net
of foreign tax credit of $255 and $529
|
-
|
3,100
|
-
|
|||||||
Different
tax rates and permanent
|
||||||||||
differences
applicable to
|
||||||||||
foreign
operations
|
(4,816
|
)
|
(5,128
|
)
|
(3,380
|
)
|
||||
Utilization
of net operating loss
|
||||||||||
carryforward
|
(66
|
)
|
(122
|
)
|
(165
|
)
|
||||
Principally
the utilization of research and
|
||||||||||
development
tax credits
|
(409
|
)
|
(630
|
)
|
(1,413
|
)
|
||||
State
(benefit) taxes, net of federal benefit
|
279
|
161
|
(81
|
)
|
||||||
Other,
net
|
301
|
678
|
59
|
|||||||
$
|
5,845
|
$
|
7,482
|
$
|
3,649
|
F-27
(1)Under
the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the "Act"), the Company has repatriated
earnings from controlled foreign corporations ("CFC's") in the amount of
$70,560,000 in order to take advantage of the temporary 85 percent dividends
received deduction for cash dividends in excess of the historical "base-period"
average. This results in an effective federal tax rate of approximately 5.0%.
The election to repatriate these CFC earnings expired on December 31, 2005
and
the dividend proceeds must meet a number of criteria as outlined in the Act
to
be eligible for the favorable tax rate. In prior years, the Company provided
deferred taxes of approximately $7,668,000 on a portion of its CFC earnings
which management concluded would likely be repatriated. As a result of the
favorable tax treatment afforded the repatriation of CFC earnings and
management’s decision to repatriate such funds in 2005, the Company recorded a
$6,326,000 tax benefit in 2004 which results from the difference in tax rates
between the Act and the tax rates previously provided on the portion of CFC
earnings which were expected to be repatriated,
leaving
deferred income taxes in the amount of approximately $1,342,000 recorded
pertaining to such earnings to be repatriated. In light of the planned
repatriation during 2004 of CFC earnings in 2005, Management had identified
certain domestic and foreign tax exposures relating to such operations. Such
amount has been included in Income Taxes Payable in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet. Prior to the enactment of the Act, it was
management’s intention to permanently reinvest the majority of the earnings of
foreign subsidiaries in the expansion of its foreign operations. No earnings
were repatriated during 2004 and 2003. Unrepatriated earnings, upon which U.S.
income taxes have not been accrued, are approximately $85.4 million at December
31, 2006. Such
unrepatriated earnings are deemed by management to be permanently
reinvested.
Estimated income taxes related to unrepatriated foreign earnings are $26.0
million under the current tax law as the Act has expired.
The
Company files income tax returns in all jurisdictions in which it has reason
to
believe it is subject to tax. Historically, the Company has been subject to
examination by various taxing jurisdictions. To date, none of these examinations
has resulted in any material additional tax. Nonetheless, any tax jurisdiction
may contend that a filing position claimed by the Company regarding one or
more
of its transactions is contrary to that jurisdiction's laws or regulations.
Significant judgment is required in determining the worldwide provisions for
income taxes. In the ordinary course of a global business, the ultimate tax
outcome is uncertain for many transactions. It is our policy to establish
provisions for taxes that may become payable in future years as a result of
an
examination by tax authorities. We establish the provisions based upon
management’s assessment of exposure associated with permanent tax differences
and tax credits applied to temporary difference adjustments. The tax provisions
are analyzed periodically (at least quarterly) and adjustments are made as
events occur that warrant adjustments to those provisions.
The
Company is currently being audited by the United States Internal Revenue Service
(“IRS”) for the year ended December 31, 2004. As part of this audit the IRS is
also reviewing the
years
ended December 31, 2003 and 2005. This examination is in its early stages and
to
date no adjustments have been proposed by the IRS.
F-28
The
types
of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and
their financial reporting amounts that give rise to deferred
tax
liabilities
and
deferred tax assets
and
their approximate tax effects are as follows. All amounts are in thousands
of
dollars.
December
31,
|
|||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||||
Temporary
|
|
Temporary
|
|
||||||||||
Difference
|
Tax
Effect
|
Difference
|
Tax
Effect
|
||||||||||
Deferred
Tax Assets -
|
|||||||||||||
current
|
|||||||||||||
Unrealized
|
|||||||||||||
appreciation/
depreciation
|
|||||||||||||
in
marketable securities
|
$
|
2,107
|
$
|
801
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
|||||
Reserves
and accruals
|
3,586
|
865
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
$
|
5,693
|
$
|
1,666
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Deferred
Tax Assets -
|
|||||||||||||
non-current:
|
|||||||||||||
United
States net operating loss
|
|||||||||||||
carryforward
|
$
|
2,335
|
$
|
887
|
$
|
4,316
|
$
|
1,640
|
|||||
Unfunded
pension liability
|
2,332
|
686
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Depreciation
|
677
|
188
|
(2,474
|
)
|
(134
|
)
|
|||||||
Amortization
|
1,654
|
519
|
972
|
373
|
|||||||||
State
net operating loss and
|
|||||||||||||
credits
carryforward
|
1,821
|
338
|
1,887
|
345
|
|||||||||
Other
accruals
|
3,378
|
1,145
|
6,660
|
2,022
|
|||||||||
Valuation
allowances
|
(1,821
|
)
|
(338
|
)
|
(1,887
|
)
|
(345
|
)
|
|||||
$
|
10,376
|
$
|
3,425
|
$
|
9,474
|
$
|
3,901
|
||||||
Deferred
Tax Liability -
|
|||||||||||||
current:
|
|||||||||||||
Unrealized
|
|||||||||||||
appreciation/
depreciation
|
|||||||||||||
in
marketable securities
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
5,661
|
$
|
2,151
|
|||||
Reserves
and accruals
|
-
|
-
|
(2,352
|
)
|
(739
|
)
|
|||||||
|
$ | - |
$
|
-
|
$
|
3,309
|
$
|
1,412
|
The
Company was granted a ten year tax holiday in Macao which resulted in an
effective tax rate of 8%, which was 50% of the normal tax rate. Such holiday
expired during 2004. The rate for the year ended December 31, 2006 is 12%.
During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company used a $764,000 net
operating loss which resulted in a tax savings of approximately $122,000. During
the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company used $1.1 million of net operating
loss carry-forwards, which resulted in a tax savings of approximately $165,000.
F-29
Galaxy,
at the time of the acquisition, had a net operating loss carry forward of
approximately $5.4 million. The remaining net operating loss carry forward
of
approximately $2.3 million at December 31, 2006, arose principally from the
non-qualified dispositions of stock options and warrants and expires during
2024. The use of the operating loss is limited, due to the change of ownership,
but the Company expects to use the $2.3 million over the next two
years.
During
2005, the Company was granted an offshore operating license from the government
of Macao to set up a Commercial Offshore Company ("MCO") named Bel Fuse (Macao
Commercial Offshore) Limited. Sales to third party customers commenced during
the first quarter of 2006. Sales consist of products manufactured in the PRC.
The MCO is not subject to Macao corporation income taxes.
9. DEBT
a. Short-term
debt
Previously
the Company had available one domestic line of credit of $10 million. During
March 2005, the Company borrowed $8 million against the line of credit to
partially finance the acquisition of Galaxy. The outstanding balance was paid
off in its entirety on June 30, 2005. During July 2005, the Company amended
its
credit agreement to increase the line of credit to $20 million, which expires
on
July 21, 2008. During October and November of 2005, the Company borrowed $4
million against the line of credit. The outstanding balance was paid off in
its
entirety during December 2005. There was no balance outstanding as of December
31, 2006. At that date, the entire $20 million line of credit was available
to
the Company to borrow. The line
was
initially
collateralized with a first priority security interest in and lien on
100%
of
the issued and outstanding shares of the capital stock of the Company's material
domestic subsidiaries and 65%
of
all the issued and outstanding shares of the capital stock of certain of the
foreign subsidiaries of the Company and all other personal property of
the
Company. In July 2005, the lender terminated it's security interest in assets of
the Company other than the lender’s first priority security interest in 100% of
the issued and outstanding shares of the capital stock of the Company's material
domestic subsidiaries and 65% of all the issued and outstanding shares of the
capital stock of certain of the foreign subsidiaries
of the
Company. The line bore interest at LIBOR plus 0.75% to 1.25% based on certain
financial statement ratios maintained by the Company. As of December 31, 2006,
the Company was in compliance with its debt covenants. During
February 2007, the Company replaced the $20 million line of credit with a $20
million line of credit from a different lender, on substantially the same terms
and conditions as previously existed, except that the new lender did not receive
a security interest in any assets of the Company.
The
Company’s Hong Kong subsidiary has an unsecured line of credit of approximately
$2 million which was unused as of December 31, 2006. The line of credit expires
during July 2007. Borrowing on the line of credit is guaranteed by the U.S.
parent. The line of credit bears interest at a rate determined by the bank
as
the financing is extended.
F-30
b. Long-term
debt
On
March
21, 2003, the Company entered into a $10 million secured term loan, which was
paid off in June 2005. The loan was used to partially finance the Company's
acquisition of Insilco's Passive Components Group. This term loan facility
is no
longer available to the Company.
For
the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company recorded interest
expense of $71,000, $325,000 and $239,000, respectively.
10 ACCRUED
EXPENSES
Accrued
expenses consist of the following:
Year
Ended December 31,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Sales
commissions
|
$
|
1,715,816
|
$
|
1,812,135
|
|||
Investment
banking commissions
|
-
|
1,105,510
|
|||||
Subcontracting
labor
|
2,032,763
|
1,597,279
|
|||||
Salaries,
bonuses and
|
|||||||
related
benefits
|
4,147,135
|
2,642,729
|
|||||
Other
|
4,817,703
|
3,509,905
|
|||||
$
|
12,713,417
|
$
|
10,667,558
|
11. BUSINESS
SEGMENT INFORMATION
The
Company operates in one industry with three reportable segments. The segments
are geographic and include North America, Asia and Europe. The primary criteria
by which financial performance is evaluated and resources are allocated are
revenues and operating income. The following is a summary of key financial
data.
All amounts are in thousands of dollars.
F-31
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
||||||||
Net
sales from unrelated
|
||||||||||
entities
and country
|
||||||||||
of Company's domicile: | ||||||||||
North
America
|
$
|
73,241
|
$
|
69,089
|
$
|
67,177
|
||||
Asia
|
153,037
|
131,104
|
109,011
|
|||||||
Europe
|
28,655
|
15,723
|
13,834
|
|||||||
$
|
254,933
|
$
|
215,916
|
$
|
190,022
|
|||||
Net
sales:
|
||||||||||
North
America
|
$
|
80,860
|
$
|
80,836
|
$
|
76,979
|
||||
Asia
|
200,773
|
151,992
|
132,224
|
|||||||
Europe
|
30,105
|
16,967
|
15,194
|
|||||||
Less
intergeographic
|
||||||||||
revenues
|
(56,805
|
)
|
(33,879
|
)
|
(34,375
|
)
|
||||
$
|
254,933
|
$
|
215,916
|
$
|
190,022
|
|||||
Income
from Operations:
|
||||||||||
North
America
|
$
|
2,658
|
$
|
4,020
|
$
|
8,475
|
||||
Asia
|
19,622
|
22,391
|
15,805
|
|||||||
Europe
|
838
|
206
|
631
|
|||||||
$
|
23,118
|
$
|
26,617
|
$
|
24,911
|
|||||
Long
Lived Assets:
|
||||||||||
North
America
|
$
|
18,026
|
$
|
17,419
|
||||||
Asia
|
30,050
|
27,944
|
||||||||
Europe
|
690
|
694
|
||||||||
$
|
48,766
|
$
|
46,057
|
|||||||
Capital
Expenditures:
|
||||||||||
North
America
|
$
|
2,823
|
$
|
1,328
|
$
|
736
|
||||
Asia
|
6,783
|
6,322
|
5,557
|
|||||||
Europe
|
227
|
96
|
286
|
|||||||
$
|
9,833
|
$
|
7,746
|
$
|
6,579
|
|||||
Depreciation
and Amortization
|
||||||||||
expense:
|
||||||||||
North
America
|
$
|
2,314
|
$
|
2,526
|
$
|
1,928
|
||||
Asia
|
6,477
|
7,364
|
6,966
|
|||||||
Europe
|
237
|
214
|
131
|
|||||||
$
|
9,028
|
$
|
10,104
|
$
|
9,025
|
F-32
Transfers
between geographic areas include finished products manufactured in foreign
countries which are then transferred to the United States and Europe for sale;
finished goods manufactured in the United States which are transferred to Europe
and Asia for sale; and semi-finished components manufactured in the United
States which
are
sold
to Asia for further processing. Income from operations represents gross profit
less operating expenses.
Identifiable
assets are those assets of the Company that are identified with the operations
of each geographic area.
The
territory of Hong Kong became a Special Administrative Region (“SAR”) of the
People's Republic of China in the middle of 1997. The territory of Macao became
a SAR of the People’s Republic of China at the end of 1999. Management cannot
presently predict what future impact this will have on the Company, if any,
or
how the political climate in China will affect the Company's contractual
arrangements in China. Substantially all of the Company's manufacturing
operations and approximately 38% of its identifiable assets are located in
The
People's Republic of China and its SARs of Hong Kong and Macao. Accordingly,
events which may result from the expiration of such leases,
as well
as any change in the "Most Favored Nation" status granted to China by the U.S.,
could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
The
Company had sales to one customer in excess of ten percent of consolidated
net
sales as follows in 2006, 2005 and 2004: The amount and percentages of the
Company's sales to this customer in each
year
was $42,167,000 (16.5%) in 2006, $32,844,000 (15.2%) in 2005 and $22,062,000
(11.6%) in 2004. Management believes that the loss of such customer could have
a
material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated results of operations,
financial position and cash flows.
F-33
12. RETIREMENT
FUND AND PROFIT SHARING PLAN
The
Company maintains a domestic profit sharing plan and a contributory stock
ownership and savings 401(K) plan, which combines stock ownership and individual
voluntary savings provisions to provide retirement benefits for plan
participants. The plan provides for participants to voluntarily contribute
a
portion of their compensation, subject to certain legal maximums. The Company
will match, based on a sliding scale, up to $350 for the first $600 contributed
by each participant. Matching contributions plus additional discretionary
contributions are made with Company stock purchased in the open market. The
expense for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 amounted to
approximately $471,000, $437,000 and $404,000, respectively. As of December
31,
2006, the plans owned 18,374 and 144,423 shares of Bel Fuse Inc. Class A and
Class B common stock, respectively.
The
Company's Far East subsidiaries have a retirement fund covering substantially
all of their Hong Kong based full-time employees. Eligible employees contribute
up to 5% of their salary to the fund. In addition, the Company may contribute
an
amount up to 7% of eligible salary, as determined by Hong Kong government
regulations, in cash or Company stock. The expense for the years ended December
31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 amounted to approximately $408,000, $482,000 and
$447,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2006, the plan owned 3,323 and 17,756
shares of Bel Fuse Inc. Class A and Class B common stock,
respectively.
The
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the "SERP" or the “Plan”) is designed to
provide a limited group of key management and highly compensated employees
of
the Company with
supplemental
retirement and death benefits. The Plan was established by the Company in 2002.
Employees are selected at the sole discretion of the Board of Directors of
the
Company to participate in the Plan. The Plan is unfunded. The Company utilizes
life insurance to partially cover its obligations under the Plan. The benefits
available under the Plan vary according to when and how the participant
terminates employment with the Company. If a participant retires (with the
prior
written consent of the Company) on his normal retirement date (65 years old,
20
years of service, and 5 years of Plan participation), his normal retirement
benefit under the Plan would be annual payments equal to 40% of his average
base
compensation (calculated using compensation from the highest 5 consecutive
calendar years of Plan participation), payable in monthly installments for
the
remainder of his life. If a participant retires early from the Company (55
years
old, 20 years of service, and 5 years of Plan participation), his early
retirement benefit under the Plan would be an amount (i) calculated as if his
early retirement date were in fact his normal retirement date, (ii) multiplied
by a fraction, with the numerator being the actual years of service the
participant has with the Company and the denominator being the years of service
the participant would have had if he had retired at age 65, and (iii)
actuarially reduced to reflect the early retirement date. If a participant
dies
prior to receiving 120 monthly payments under the Plan, his beneficiary would
be
entitled to continue receiving benefits for the shorter of (i) the time
necessary to complete 120 monthly payments or (ii) 60 months. If a participant
dies while employed by the Company, his beneficiary would receive, as a survivor
benefit, an annual amount equal to (i) 100% of the participant’s annual base
salary at date of death for one year, and (ii) 50% of the participant’s annual
base salary at date of death for each of the following 4 years, each payable
in
monthly installments. The Plan also provides for disability benefits, and a
forfeiture of
benefits if a participant terminates employment for reasons other than those
contemplated under the Plan. The expense for the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004 amounted to approximately $729,000, $699,000 and $509,000,
respectively.
F-34
The
following provides a reconciliation of benefit obligations, the funded status
of
the SERP and a summary of significant assumptions:
December
31,
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||||
Change
in benefit obligation:
|
||||||||||
Projected
benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
$
|
4,476,296
|
$
|
2,890,113
|
$
|
2,637,902
|
||||
Service
cost
|
325,415
|
331,942
|
221,981
|
|||||||
Interest
cost
|
242,587
|
211,920
|
145,085
|
|||||||
Plan
amendments
|
-
|
444,684
|
-
|
|||||||
Benefits
paid
|
(131,250
|
)
|
(37,500
|
)
|
-
|
|||||
Actuarial
(gains) losses
|
(184,762
|
)
|
635,137
|
(114,855
|
)
|
|||||
Minimum
pension obligation and
|
||||||||||
unfunded
pension liability
|
$
|
4,728,286
|
$
|
4,476,296
|
$
|
2,890,113
|
||||
Funded
status of plan:
|
||||||||||
Under
funded status
|
$
|
(4,728,286
|
)
|
$
|
(4,476,296
|
)
|
$
|
(2,890,113
|
)
|
|
Unrecognized
net loss
|
-
|
869,673
|
259,218
|
|||||||
Unrecognized
prior service costs
|
-
|
1,811,297
|
1,497,253
|
|||||||
Accrued
pension cost
|
$
|
(4,728,286
|
)
|
$
|
(1,795,326
|
)
|
$
|
(1,133,642
|
)
|
|
Change
in plan assets:
|
||||||||||
Fair
value of plan assets, beginning of year
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||
Company
contributions
|
131,250
|
37,500
|
-
|
|||||||
Benefit
paid
|
(131,250
|
)
|
(37,500
|
)
|
-
|
|||||
Fair
value of plan assets, end of year
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||
Balance
sheet amounts:
|
||||||||||
Minimum
pension obligation and
|
||||||||||
unfunded
pension liability
|
$
|
4,728,286
|
$
|
3,450,688
|
$
|
2,261,583
|
||||
Intangible
asset
|
-
|
1,655,362
|
1,127,941
|
|||||||
The
components of SERP expense are as follows:
|
||||||||||
December
31,
|
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||||
Service
cost
|
$
|
325,415
|
$
|
331,942
|
$
|
221,981
|
||||
Interest
cost
|
242,587
|
211,920
|
145,085
|
|||||||
Net
amortization and deferral
|
161,142
|
155,322
|
142,363
|
|||||||
Total
SERP expense
|
$
|
729,144
|
$
|
699,184
|
$
|
509,429
|
||||
Assumption
percentages:
|
||||||||||
Discount
rate
|
6.00
|
%
|
5.50
|
%
|
5.50
|
%
|
||||
Rate
of compensation increase
|
3.00
|
%
|
3.00
|
%
|
3.00
|
%
|
||||
The
accumulated benefit obligation for the SERP was $3,503,524 and $3,450,688 as
of
December 31, 2006 and 2005.
F-35
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS
No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Post
Retirement Plans”, (“SFAS No. 158”). This statement is effective for fiscal
years ending after December 15, 2006 and is applicable for the Company’s SERP
Plan.
The
amount of net gain and prior service cost on a pretax basis included in Other
Comprehensive Income is $656,963 and $1,675,749, respectively, which arose
during the year ended
December 31, 2006.
The
estimated portion of net periodic gain and prior service cost that will be
recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal
year
is $12,965 and $133,094, respectively.
The
Company had no net transition assets or obligations recognized as an adjustment
to Other Comprehensive Income and does not anticipate any plan assets being
returned to the Company during 2007, as the plan has no assets.
The
following balance sheet accounts were incrementally adjusted due to the
effect of applying SFAS No. 158 at December 31, 2006:
Deferred tax asset - long term | $ |
686,000
|
||
Other Comprehensive Loss - net of income tax benefit |
1,646,712
|
|||
Unfunded pension liability - long term |
2,332,712
|
|||
Intangible assets |
(1,107,000
|
) |
13.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
On
January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (R)
"Share-Based Payment" requiring the recognition of compensation expense in
the
Consolidated Statements of Operations related to the fair value of its employee
stock-based options and awards. SFAS No. 123 (R)
revises SFAS No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" and supercedes
APB Opinion No. 25 "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees." SFAS No. 123(R)
is supplemented by SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") No. 107 "Share-Based
Payment." SAB No. 107 expresses the SEC staff's views regarding the interaction
between SFAS No. 123(R) and certain SEC rules and regulations including the
valuation of stock-based payment arrangements.
The
Company recognizes the cost of all employee stock options on a straight-line
attribution basis over their respective vesting periods, net of estimated
forfeitures. The Company has selected the modified prospective method of
transition; accordingly, prior periods have not been restated. Prior to adopting
SFAS No. 123(R), the Company applied APB Opinion No. 25
and
related interpretations in accounting for its stock-based compensation plans.
All employee stock options were granted at or above the grant date market price.
Accordingly, prior to 2006 no compensation cost was recognized for fixed stock
option grants.
F-36
On
December 31, 2006, the Company has one stock-based compensation plan, which
is
described below. During the year ended December 31, 2006, the adoption of SFAS
No. 123(R) resulted in incremental stock-based compensation expense of
approximately $453,433. The incremental stock-based compensation expense caused
both the basic and diluted earnings per common share to each
decrease
by $.04 and $.04 per share for Class A common stock and $.03 and $.03 per share
for Class B common stock, respectively, for
the
year
ended December 31, 2006.
In
addition, in connection with the adoption of SFAS No. 123 (R),
net
cash provided by operating activities decreased and net cash provided by
financing activities increased during the year ended December 31, 2006 by
$336,456 related to excess tax benefits from stock-based payment
arrangements.
The
aggregate pretax compensation cost recognized in net earnings for stock-based
compensation (including incentive stock options, restricted stock and dividends
on restricted stock, as further discussed below) amounted to approximately
$1,571,000 and $248,000 for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. The Company did not use any cash to settle any equity instruments
granted under share based arrangements during the years ended December 31,
2006
and 2005.
Under
the
provisions of SFAS 123(R), the recognition of deferred compensation as a
separate component of equity representing the amount of unrecognized restricted
stock expense that is reduced as expense is recognized at the date restricted
stock is granted, is no longer required. Therefore, at January 1, 2006, the
amount that had been in "Deferred compensation" in the Consolidated Balance
Sheet was reversed to zero and is currently included in additional paid-in
capital.
Stock
Options
The
Company has an
equity
compensation program
(the
"Program")
which
provides for the granting of "Incentive Stock Options" within
the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended,
non-qualified stock options and restricted stock awards.
The
Company believes that such awards better align the interest of its employees
with those of its shareholders. The Plan provides for the issuance of 2,400,000
common shares. Unless
otherwise provided at the date of grant or unless subsequently accelerated,
options granted under the Program become
exercisable twenty-five percent (25%) one
year
from the date of grant and twenty-five percent (25%) for each year of the three
years thereafter. Upon exercise the Company will issue new shares. The exercise
price of incentive
stock
options
granted pursuant to the Plan is not to be less than 100 percent of the fair
market value of the shares on the date of grant. In
general,
no option will be exercisable after ten
years
from the date granted.
The
fair
value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average
assumptions used for grants in 2004, which was the last year options were
granted; dividends yield of 0.9%, expected volatility of 35% for Class B;
risk-free interest rate of 5% and expected lives of 5 years. Expected
lives of options previously granted were estimated using the historical exercise
behavior of employees. Expected volatilities are based on implied volatilities
from historical volatility of the Company's stock. The Company uses historical
data to estimate employee forfeitures. The risk free rate is based on the U.S.
Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant.
F-37
Information
regarding the Company’s stock
options
for
2006, 2005, and 2004 is as follows:
2006
|
2005
|
2004
|
|||||||||||||||||
Weighted-
|
Weighted-
|
Weighted-
|
|||||||||||||||||
Average
|
Average
|
Average
|
|||||||||||||||||
Exercise
|
Exercise
|
Exercise
|
|||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Price
|
Shares
|
Price
|
Shares
|
Price
|
||||||||||||||
Options
out-
|
|||||||||||||||||||
standing,
begin-
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ning
of year
|
286,013
|
$
|
24.96
|
495,289
|
$
|
23.17
|
712,600
|
$
|
21.61
|
||||||||||
Options
exercised
|
(132,800
|
)
|
$
|
24.00
|
(200,276
|
)
|
$
|
20.50
|
(200,911
|
)
|
$
|
19.37
|
|||||||
Options
granted
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
24,000
|
$
|
37.00
|
||||||||||
Options
cancelled
|
(15,400
|
)
|
$
|
27.60
|
(9,000
|
)
|
$
|
27.29
|
(40,400
|
)
|
$
|
22.71
|
|||||||
Options
out-
|
|||||||||||||||||||
standing,
end
|
|||||||||||||||||||
of
year
|
137,813
|
$
|
25.59
|
286,013
|
$
|
24.96
|
495,289
|
$
|
23.17
|
||||||||||
Options
price
|
|||||||||||||||||||
range
at end
|
|||||||||||||||||||
of
year
|
$
|
18.89
to $37.00
|
$
|
18.89
to $37.00
|
$
|
17.00
to $37.00
|
|||||||||||||
Options
price
|
|||||||||||||||||||
range
for
|
|||||||||||||||||||
exercised
|
|||||||||||||||||||
shares
|
$
|
18.89
to $29.50
|
$
|
17.00
to $29.50
|
$
|
15.38
to $29.50
|
|||||||||||||
Options
available
|
|||||||||||||||||||
for
grant at end
|
|||||||||||||||||||
of
year
|
811,785
|
810,985
|
954,385
|
||||||||||||||||
Weighted-
|
|||||||||||||||||||
average
fair
|
|||||||||||||||||||
value
of options
|
|||||||||||||||||||
granted
during
|
|||||||||||||||||||
the
year
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
8.66
|
During
the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 the Company received $3,186,587
and
$4,115,508 from the exercise of stock options and realized tax benefits of
approximately $336,000 and $430,000, respectively. The total intrinsic value
of
options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was
$1,498,043, $2,853,734 and $3,453,948, respectively. Stock compensation expense
applicable to stock options for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and
2004
was approximately $453,433, $-0- and $-0-, respectively. The aggregated
intrinsic value of options outstanding as of December 31, 2006 was
$1,269,158.
F-38
The
following table summarizes information about fixed-price stock options
outstanding at December 31, 2006:
Weighted-
|
||||||||||||||||
Number
Out-
|
Average
|
Weighted-
|
Number
|
Weighted-
|
||||||||||||
Range
of
|
standing
at
|
Remaining
|
Average
|
Exercisable
at
|
Average
|
|||||||||||
Exercise
|
December
31,
|
Contractual
|
Exercise
|
December
31,
|
Exercise
|
|||||||||||
Prices
|
2006
|
Life
|
Price
|
2006
|
Price
|
|||||||||||
$29.50
|
61,813
|
3
years
|
$
|
29.50
|
16,813
|
$
|
29.50
|
|||||||||
$19.52
- $22.25
|
5,000
|
1
year
|
$
|
21.70
|
5,000
|
$
|
21.70
|
|||||||||
$18.89
|
57,000
|
1
year
|
$
|
18.89
|
18,000
|
$
|
18.89
|
|||||||||
$37.00
|
14,000
|
3
years
|
$
|
37.00
|
7,000
|
$
|
37.00
|
|||||||||
137,813
|
2.5
years
|
$
|
25.59
|
46,813
|
$
|
25.21
|
A
summary
of the status of the Company’s non-vested options as of December 31, 2006 and
2005 and changes during the year ended December 31, 2006 is presented
below:
Weighted-Average
|
|||||||
Grant-Date
|
|||||||
Nonvested
options
|
Options
|
Fair
Value
|
|||||
Nonvested
at December 31, 2005
|
177,500
|
$
|
24.28
|
||||
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Vested
|
(71,100
|
)
|
21.52
|
||||
Forfeited
|
(15,400
|
)
|
27.60
|
||||
|
|||||||
Nonvested
at December 31, 2006
|
91,000
|
$
|
25.78
|
At
December 31, 2006 there was $51,950 of total unrecognized cost related to
nonvested stock-based compensation arrangements under the Program.
The
cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.6 years.
The fair value of the 71,100 vested shares is $1,487,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2006. The aggregate intrinsic value of options vested during 2006
was $944,208. Currently, the Company believes that substantially all options
will vest.
F-39
Restricted
Stock Awards
The
Company provides common stock awards to certain officers and key employees.
The
Company grants these awards, at its discretion, from the shares available under
the program.
Unless otherwise provided at the date of grant or unless subsequently
accelerated, the
shares
awarded are earned in 25% increments on the second,
third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the award,
respectively, and are distributed provided the employee has remained employed
by
the Company through such anniversary dates; otherwise the unearned shares are
forfeited. The market value of these shares at the date of award is recorded
as
compensation expense on the straight-line method over the five -year
periods from the respective award dates, as adjusted for forfeitures of unvested
awards. During 2005 and 2006, the Company issued 152,400 and 21,600 class B
common shares, respectively, under a restricted stock plan to various officers
and employees. The shares vest 25% after two years of employment with an
additional 25% vesting in each of years three through five. This resulted in
pre-tax compensation expense of $1,117,268 and $248,131 ($804,826 and $179,295,
after tax benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The balance of $4,444,114 of deferred stock-based compensation is included
within paid-in-capital on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.
A
summary
of the activity under the Restricted Stock Awards Plan as of December 31, 2006
is presented below:
Weighted
|
|||||||||||||
Weighted
|
Average
|
||||||||||||
Average
|
Remaining
|
Aggregate
|
|||||||||||
Restricted
Stock
|
Award
|
Contractual
|
Intrinsic
|
||||||||||
Awards
|
Shares
|
Price
|
Term
|
Value
|
|||||||||
Outstanding
at January 1, 2006
|
152,400
|
$
|
35.64
|
||||||||||
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Awarded
|
21,600
|
30.67
|
|||||||||||
Forfeited
|
(7,000
|
)
|
36.09
|
||||||||||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2006
|
167,000
|
34.93
|
3.85
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||
Vested
at
December 31, 2006
|
-
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
As
of
December 31, 2006, there was $4.4 million of total pre-tax unrecognized
compensation cost related to non-vested stock based compensation arrangements
granted under the restricted stock award plan; that cost is expected to be
recognized over a period of 4.5 years.
The
Company's policy is to issue new shares to satisfy Restricted Stock Awards
and stock
option exercises.
Currently
the Company believes that substantially all restricted stock awards will
vest.
F-40
14.
COMMON STOCK
During
2000, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the repurchase of up
to
ten percent (10%) of the Company’s outstanding common shares from time to time
in market or privately negotiated transactions. As of December 31, 2006, the
Company had purchased and retired 23,600 Class B common shares at a cost of
approximately $808,000 which reduced the number of Class B common shares
outstanding. No shares were repurchased during the years ended December 31,
2006
or 2005.
There
are
no contractual restrictions on the Company's ability to pay dividends provided
the Company continues to comply with the financial tests in its credit
agreement. On February 1, 2006, May 1, 2006, August 1, 2006 and November 1,
2006
the Company paid a $0.05 per share dividend to all shareholders of record of
Class B Common Stock in the total amount of $443,589, $443,320, $447,410 and
$457,945,
respectively. On February 1, 2006, May 1, 2006, August 1, 2006 and November
1,
2006 the Company paid a $0.04 per share dividend to all shareholders of record
of Class A Common Stock in the total amount of $107,735, $107,735, $107,735
and
$107,735, respectively. On February 2, 2005, May 2, 2005, August 1, 2005, and
November 1, 2005 the Company paid a $0.05 per share dividend to all shareholders
of record of Class B Common Stock in the total amount of $433,450, $437,175,
$439,450, and $442,356, respectively. On February 2, 2005, May 2, 2005, August
1, 2005 and November 1, 2005 the Company paid a $0.04 per share dividend to
all
shareholders of record of Class A Common Stock in the total amount of $107,735,
$107,735, $107,735 and $107,735, respectively.
15. COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
Leases
The
Company leases various facilities. Some of these leases require the Company
to
pay certain executory costs (such as insurance and maintenance).
Future
minimum lease payments for operating leases are approximately as
follows:
Years Ending | ||||||
December 31, | ||||||
2007
|
$
|
1,659,000
|
||||
2008
|
1,099,000
|
|||||
2009
|
833,000
|
|||||
2010
|
572,000
|
|||||
2011
|
572,000
|
|||||
$
|
4,735,000
|
Rental
expense was approximately $1,733,000, $1,624,000 and $1,433,000 for the years
ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.
F-41
Legal
Proceedings
The
Company and two of its officers are defendants in a wrongful termination lawsuit
brought in the District Court of Frankfurt am Main, Germany by a former employee
at a foreign subsidiary of the Company. The Company believes it has adequately
accrued sufficient amounts for this liability in accordance with the terms
of
the ex-employee's employment agreement.
The
Company is a plaintiff in a lawsuit captioned Bel Fuse Inc., a New Jersey
corporation, and Bel Power, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation, v. Andrew
Ferencz, Gregory Zovonar, Bernhard Schroter, EE2GO, Inc., a Massachusetts
corporation, Howard E. Kaepplein and William Ng, brought in the Superior Court
of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The Company was granted injunctive relief
and is seeking damages against the former stockholders of Galaxy Power, Inc.,
key employees of Galaxy and a corporation formed by some or all of the
individual defendants. The Company has alleged that the defendants violated
their written non-competition, non-disclosure and non-solicitation agreements,
diverted business and usurped substantial business opportunities with key
customers, misappropriated confidential information and trade secrets, and
harmed the Company’s business.
In
a
related matter, the Company is a defendant in a lawsuit captioned Robert
Chimielnski, P.C. on behalf of the stockholder representatives and the former
stockholders of Galaxy Power, Inc. v. Bel Fuse Inc. et al. brought in the
Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This complaint for damages
and injunctive relief is based on an alleged breach of contract and other
allegedly illegal acts in a corporate context arising out of the defendants'
objection to the release of nearly $2.0 million held in escrow under the terms
of the stock purchase agreement between Galaxy and the Company. The Company
believes it has adequate defenses regarding this lawsuit and accordingly has
not
accrued any liability in connection with such lawsuit.
The
Company is a defendant in a lawsuit captioned Murata Manufacturing Company,
Ltd.
v. Bel Fuse Inc. et al, brought in Illinois Federal District Court. Plaintiff
claims that its patent covers all of the Company's modular jack products. That
party had previously advised the Company that it was willing to grant a
non-exclusive license to the Company under the patent for a 3% royalty on all
future gross sales of ICM products; payment of a lump sum of 3% of past sales
including sales of applicable Insilco products; an annual minimum royalty of
$500,000; payment of all attorney fees; and marking of all licensed ICM's with
the third party's patent number. The Company is also a defendant in a lawsuit,
captioned Regal Electronics, Inc. v. Bel Fuse Inc., brought in California
Federal District Court. Plaintiff claims that its patent covers certain of
the
Company's modular jack products. That party had previously advised the Company
that it was willing to grant a non-transferable license to the Company for
an up
front fee of $500,000 plus a 6% royalty on future sales. The District Court
has
granted summary judgment in the Company's favor dismissing Regal Electronics'
infringement claims, while at the same time the Court dismissed the Company's
invalidity counterclaim against Regal Electronics. Regal
has
appealed the Court's rejection of its infringement claims to the U.S. Court
of
Appeals. The case was heard on February 6, 2007 and the U.S. Court of Appeals
upheld the District Court’s ruling in favor of the Company.
F-42
The
Company cannot predict the outcome of these matters or the impact on the
Company's consolidated financial condition or results of
operations.
The
Company is not a party to any other legal proceeding, the adverse outcome of
which is likely
to have
a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated financial condition
or
results of operations.
16. ACCUMULATED
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
The
components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of December
31,
2006 and 2005 are summarized below:
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Foreign
currency translation
|
|||||||
adjustment
|
$
|
1,140,884
|
$
|
753,062
|
|||
Unrealized
holding gain (loss)
|
|||||||
on
available-for-sale securities
|
|||||||
under
SFAS No. 115, net of
|
|||||||
taxes
of $(802,797) and $2,244,207
|
|||||||
as
of December 31, 2006 and 2005
|
(1,309,827
|
)
|
3,509,805
|
||||
Unfunded
SERP liability upon
|
|||||||
adoption
of SFAS No. 158, net
|
|||||||
of
taxes of $(686,000) as of
|
|||||||
December
31, 2006
|
(1,646,712
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive
|
|||||||
income
(loss)
|
$
|
(1,815,655
|
)
|
$
|
4,262,867
|
F-43
CONDENSED
SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
|
||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Year
|
|
|||||
|
|
Quarter
Ended
|
|
Ended
|
|
|||||||||||
|
|
March
31,
|
|
June
30,
|
|
September
30,
|
|
December
31,
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|||||
|
|
2006
|
|
2006
|
|
2006
|
|
2006
|
|
2006
|
|
|||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
54,626,248
|
$
|
66,474,098
|
$
|
73,259,757
|
$
|
60,572,883
|
$
|
254,932,986
|
||||||
Gross
profit
|
14,639,359
|
16,212,423
|
17,449,799
|
13,646,401
|
61,947,982
|
|||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
3,997,299
|
8,763,456
|
7,745,485
|
4,697,113
|
25,203,353
|
|||||||||||
Earnings
|
||||||||||||||||
per
Class A
common share
|
||||||||||||||||
-
basic
(2)
|
$
|
0.32
|
$
|
0.71
|
$
|
0.62
|
$
|
0.38
|
$
|
2.03
|
||||||
Earnings
|
||||||||||||||||
per
Class A
common share
|
||||||||||||||||
diluted
(2)
|
$
|
0.32
|
$
|
0.71
|
$
|
0.62
|
$
|
0.38
|
$
|
2.03
|
||||||
Earnings
|
||||||||||||||||
per
Class B
common share
|
||||||||||||||||
-
basic
(2)
|
$
|
0.35
|
$
|
0.75
|
$
|
0.66
|
$
|
0.40
|
$
|
2.16
|
||||||
Earnings
|
||||||||||||||||
per
Class B
common share
|
||||||||||||||||
diluted
(2)
|
$
|
0.34
|
$
|
0.75
|
$
|
0.66
|
$
|
0.40
|
$
|
2.15
|
||||||
As
previously
reported (2)
|
||||||||||||||||
Earnings
per
share - basic
|
$
|
0.34
|
$
|
0.74
|
$
|
0.65
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
||||||||
Earnings
per
share - diluted
|
$
|
0.34
|
$
|
0.74
|
$
|
0.65
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Total
Year
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Quarter
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
June
30,
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Net
sales
|
$
|
45,438,285
|
$
|
57,545,421
|
$
|
56,247,745
|
$
|
56,684,305
|
$
|
215,915,756
|
||||||
Gross
profit
|
12,749,474
|
16,853,324
|
15,827,945
|
14,338,289
|
59,769,032
|
|||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
4,313,365
|
6,668,675
|
5,986,397
|
3,264,840
|
20,233,277
|
|||||||||||
Earnings
|
||||||||||||||||
per
Class A
common share
|
||||||||||||||||
-
basic
(2)
|
$
|
0.36
|
$
|
0.55
|
$
|
0.50
|
$
|
0.26
|
$
|
1.67
|
||||||
Earnings
|
||||||||||||||||
per
Class A
common share
|
||||||||||||||||
diluted
(2)
|
$
|
0.36
|
$
|
0.55
|
$
|
0.50
|
$
|
0.26
|
$
|
1.67
|
||||||
Earnings
|
||||||||||||||||
per
Class B
common share
|
||||||||||||||||
-
basic
(2)
|
$
|
0.39
|
$
|
0.59
|
$
|
0.53
|
$
|
0.28
|
$
|
1.79
|
||||||
Earnings
|
||||||||||||||||
per
Class B
common share
|
||||||||||||||||
diluted
(2)
|
$
|
0.38
|
$
|
0.59
|
$
|
0.52
|
$
|
0.28
|
$
|
1.77
|
||||||
As
previously
reported (2)
|
||||||||||||||||
Earnings
per
share - basic
|
$
|
0.38
|
$
|
0.58
|
$
|
0.52
|
$
|
0.28
|
$
|
1.76
|
||||||
Earnings
per
share - diluted
|
$
|
0.38
|
$
|
0.58
|
$
|
0.52
|
$
|
0.28
|
$
|
1.75
|
(1)
Quarterly amounts of earnings per share may not agree to the total for the
year
due to rounding.
(2)
Previously reported earnings per share have been restated to present earnings
per share using the two-class method. See Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for further discussion.
F-44
BEL
FUSE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||||||||||||||
SCHEDULE
II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING
ACCOUNTS
|
Column
A
|
Column
B
|
Column
C
|
Column
D
|
Column
E
|
Column
F
|
|||||||||||||
Charged
|
Additions
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance
at
|
to
profit
|
Charged
|
Balance
|
|||||||||||||||
beginning
|
and
loss
|
to
other
|
Deductions
|
at
close
|
||||||||||||||
Description
|
of
period
|
or
income
|
accounts
|
(describe)(a)
|
of
period
|
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||
Year
ended
December 31, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for
doubtful
|
||||||||||||||||||
accounts
|
$
|
1,107,000
|
$
|
707,000
|
$
|
109,000
|
(a
|
)
|
$
|
836,000
|
$
|
1,087,000
|
||||||
Allowance
for
excess and
|
||||||||||||||||||
obsolete
inventory
|
$
|
5,017,000
|
$
|
1,470,000
|
$
|
(6,000
|
)
|
$
|
1,418,000
|
$
|
5,063,000
|
|||||||
Year
ended
December 31, 2005
|
||||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for
doubtful
|
||||||||||||||||||
accounts
|
$
|
1,610,000
|
$
|
275,000
|
$
|
25,000
|
(a
|
)
|
$
|
803,000
|
$
|
1,107,000
|
||||||
Allowance
for
excess and
|
||||||||||||||||||
obsolete
inventory
|
$
|
5,471,000
|
$
|
867,000
|
$
|
475,000
|
$
|
1,796,000
|
$
|
5,017,000
|
||||||||
Year
ended
December 31, 2004
|
||||||||||||||||||
Allowance
for
doubtful
|
||||||||||||||||||
accounts
|
$
|
1,976,000
|
$
|
233,000
|
$
|
65,000
|
(a
|
)
|
$
|
664,000
|
$
|
1,610,000
|
||||||
Allowance
for
excess and
|
||||||||||||||||||
obsolete
inventory
|
$
|
5,679,000
|
$
|
1,250,000
|
$
|
43,000
|
$
|
1,501,000
|
$
|
5,471,000
|
(a)
Write
offs.
|
S-1
Item
9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosures.
Not
applicable
Item
9A Controls
and Procedures
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
During
the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company’s management, including the principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the Company’s
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) related to the recording, processing,
summarization, and reporting of information in the Company’s periodic reports
that the Company files with the SEC. These disclosure controls and procedures
have been designed to ensure that material information relating to the Company,
including its subsidiaries, is made known to the Company’s management, including
these officers, by other of the Company’s employees, and that this information
is recorded, processed, summarized, evaluated, and reported, as applicable,
within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. The Company’s
controls and procedures can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance
that the above objectives have been met. Notwithstanding these limitations,
the
Company believes that its disclosure controls and procedures are designed to
provide reasonable assurances of achieving their objectives.
Based
on
their evaluation as of December 31, 2006, the Company’s principal executive
officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the Company’s
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective to ensure that the
information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that the
Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC
rules and forms.
47
Management’s
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The
Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of the
Company’s management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and
principal financial officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based
on the framework in Internal
Control - Integrated Framework
issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based
on the Company’s evaluation under the framework in Internal
Control
-
Integrated
Framework,
the
Company’s management concluded that the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2006.
Our
management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 has been audited by Deloitte &
Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in
their
report which is included herein.
48
Changes
in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There
have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the last fiscal quarter to which this Annual Report on
Form
10-K relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
Item
9b.
Other
Information
Not
applicable.
Item
10.
Directors,
Executive Officers and
Corporate Governance
The
Registrant incorporates by reference herein information to be set forth in
its
definitive proxy statement for its 2007 annual meeting of shareholders that
is
responsive to the information required with respect to this item.
The
registrant has adopted a code of ethics for its directors, executive officers
and all other senior financial personnel. The Registrant will make copies of
its
code of ethics available to investors upon request. Any such request should
be
sent by mail to Bel Fuse Inc., 206 Van Vorst Street, Jersey City, NJ 07302
Attn:
Colin Dunn or should be made by telephone by calling Colin Dunn at 201-432-0463.
Item
11.
Executive
Compensation
The
Registrant incorporates by reference herein information to be set forth in
its
definitive proxy statement for its 2007 annual meeting of shareholders that
is
responsive to the information required with respect to this Item.
Item
12.
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters
The
Registrant incorporates by reference herein information to be set forth in
its
definitive proxy statement for its 2007 annual meeting of shareholders that
is
responsive to the information required with respect to this Item.
Item
13.
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions,
and
Director Independence
The
Registrant incorporates by reference herein information to be set forth in
its
definitive proxy statement for its 2007 annual meeting of shareholders that
is
responsive to the information required with respect to this Item.
Item
14.
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
The
Registrant incorporates by reference herein information to be set forth in
its
definitive proxy statement for its 2007 annual meeting of shareholders that
is
responsive to the information required with respect to this Item.
49
PART
IV
Item
15. Exhibits,
Financial Statement Schedules
Page
|
||||
(a)
|
Financial
Statements
|
|||
1.
|
Financial
statements filed as a part of this
|
|||
Annual
Report on Form 10-K:
|
||||
Report
of Independent Registered
|
||||
Public
Accounting Firm
|
|
F-1 | ||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of December 31,
|
||||
2006
and 2005
|
|
F-2
- F-3
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for Each
|
||||
of
the Three Years in the Period Ended
|
||||
December
31, 2006
|
|
F-4
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders' Equity
|
||||
for
Each of the Three Years in the Period
|
||||
|
Ended
December 31, 2006
|
F-5
- F-6
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for Each
|
||||
of
the Three Years in the Period Ended
|
||||
|
December
31, 2006
|
F-7
- F-9
|
||
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-
10 - F-43
|
||
Selected
Quarterly Financial Data - Years Ended
|
||||
December
31, 2006 and 2005 (Unaudited)
|
|
F-44
|
||
2.
|
Financial
statement schedules filed as part of
|
|||
this
report:
|
||||
Schedule
II: Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
|
|
S-1
|
||
All
other schedules are omitted because they are
|
||||
inapplicable,
not required or the information is
|
||||
included
in the consolidated financial statements or notes
|
||||
thereto.
|
50
(c) Exhibits
3.1
|
Certificate
of Incorporation, as amended, is incorporated by reference to Exhibit
3.1
of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1999.
|
3.2
|
By-laws,
as amended, are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Company's
Registration Statement on Form S-2 (Registration No. 33-16703) filed
with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 25,
1987.
|
10.1
|
Agency
agreement dated October 1, 1988 between Bel Fuse Ltd. and Rush Profit
Ltd.
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company's annual
report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1994.
|
10.2
|
Contract
dated March 16, 1990 between Accessorios Electronicos (Bel Fuse Macau
Ltd.) and the Government of Macao. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.2 of the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1994.
|
10.3
|
Loan
agreement dated February 14, 1990 between Bel Fuse, Ltd. (as lender)
and
Luen Fat Lee Electronic Factory (as borrower). Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year
ended December 31, 1995.
|
10.4
|
2002
Equity Compensation Program.
Incorporated by reference to the
Registrant’s proxy statement for its 2002 annual meeting of
shareholders.
|
10.5
|
Amended
and Restated Credit and Guarantee Agreement, dated as of March 21,
2003,
by and among Bel Fuse Inc., as Borrower, the Subsidiary Guarantors
party
thereto and The Bank of New York, as Lender. Incorporated by reference
to
Exhibit 10.7 of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2002.
|
10.6 Amendment
No. 1 dated as of July 26, 2005, to the Registrant's Amended and Restated Credit
and Guarantee Agreement dated as of March 21, 2003. Incorporated by Reference
to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 1,
2005.
51
Item
15. Exhibits,
Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on
Form
8-K
(continued)
Exhibit
No.:
10.7
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger dated as of March 4, 2005 by and among Bel Fuse,
Inc.,
Bel Westboro, Inc. and Galaxy Power, Inc. Incorporated by reference
to
exhibit 2.1 of the Company's Form 8-K dated March 7,
2005.
|
10.8
|
Contract
for Purchase and Sale of Real Estate dated July 15, 2004 between
Bel Fuse
Inc. and Fields Development Group Co .Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit
10.9 of the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2004.
|
11.1
|
A
statement regarding the computation of earnings per share is omitted
because such computation can be clearly determined from the material
contained in this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
|
22.1
|
Subsidiaries
of the Registrant.
|
23.1
|
Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm.
|
24.1 Power
of
attorney (included on the signature page)
31.1
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
31.2
|
Certification
of the Vice President of Finance pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
-
Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.2 Certification
of the Vice-President of Finance pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
52
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf
of
the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
BEL FUSE INC. | ||
|
|
|
Date: March 16, 2007 | By: | /s/ Daniel Bernstein |
Daniel Bernstein, President, Chief
Executive
Officer and
Director
|
KNOW
ALL
MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below
constitutes and appoints Daniel Bernstein and Colin Dunn as his/her
attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution,
for him/her and in his/her name, place, and stead, in any and all capacities,
to
sign and file any and all amendments to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, with
all exhibits thereto and hereto, and other documents with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent, and each
of
them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite or necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all
intents and purposes as he/she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying
and
confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their
or his substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has
been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
|
Title
|
Date
|
|||
/S/
Daniel Bernstein
|
President,
Chief
|
March
16, 2007
|
|||
Daniel
Bernstein
|
Executive
Officer and Director
|
||||
|
|||||
/s/
Howard Bernstein
|
Director
|
March
16, 2007
|
|||
Howard
B. Bernstein
|
|||||
/s/
Robert H. Simandl
|
Director
|
March
16, 2007
|
|||
Robert
H. Simandl
|
|||||
/s/
Peter Gilbert
|
Director
|
March
16, 2007
|
|||
Peter
Gilbert
|
|||||
/s/
John Tweedy
|
Director
|
March
16, 2007
|
|||
John
Tweedy
|
|||||
/s/
John Johnson
|
Director
|
March
16, 2007
|
|||
John
Johnson
|
|||||
/s/
Avi Eden
|
Director
|
March
16, 2007
|
|||
Avi
Eden
|
|||||
/s/
Colin Dunn
|
Vice-President
|
||||
Colin
Dunn
|
Finance
and Secretary
|
March
16, 2007
|
53