BEL FUSE INC /NJ - Quarter Report: 2006 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For
the
quarterly period ended June
30, 2006
or
o TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For
the
transition period from_________to_________
Commission
File Number: 0-11676
BEL
FUSE INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
NEW
JERSEY
|
22-1463699
|
(State
of other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
206
Van Vorst Street
|
Jersey
City, New Jersey
|
07302
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(201)
432-0463
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes
o
No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-12 of the Exchange
Act.
o
Large accelerated
filer x
Accelerated
filer o
Non-accelerated filer
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
o
Yes x
No
At
August
1, 2006, there were 2,702,677 shares of Class A Common Stock, $0.10 par value,
outstanding and 9,109,278 shares of Class B Common Stock, $0.10 par value,
outstanding.
BEL
FUSE INC.
|
||||
INDEX
|
||||
Page
|
||||
Part
I
|
Financial Information | |||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
1
|
||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2006 (unaudited) and December 31,
2005
|
2
-
3
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June
30, 2006
and 2005 (unaudited)
|
4
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the Years ended December
31, 2005
and 2004 and the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
(unaudited)
|
5
-
6
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
and 2005
(unaudited)
|
7
-
9
|
|||
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
10
- 32
|
|||
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
33
- 52
|
||
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
53
|
||
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
54
|
||
Part
II
|
Other Information | |||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
55
- 56
|
||
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
56
|
||
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
57
|
||
Signatures
|
58
|
PART
I.
Financial
Information
Item
1. Financial
Statements
Certain
information and footnote disclosures required under accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or
omitted from the following consolidated financial statements pursuant to the
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. It is suggested
that the following consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction
with
the year-end consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in
the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005.
The
results of operations for the six and three months ended June 30, 2006 and
2005
are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire fiscal year or
for
any other period.
-1-
BEL
FUSE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Current
Assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
78,446,271
|
$
|
51,997,634
|
|||
Marketable
securities
|
15,874,250
|
38,463,108
|
|||||
Accounts
receivable - less allowance for doubtful accounts of $777,603
and
$1,107,000 at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005,
respectively
|
47,341,622
|
39,304,984
|
|||||
Inventories
|
38,873,293
|
32,947,103
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
2,904,216
|
1,691,017
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
510,000
|
-
|
|||||
Assets
held for sale
|
848,049
|
828,131
|
|||||
Total
Current Assets
|
184,797,701
|
165,231,977
|
|||||
Property,
plant and equipment - net
|
42,528,691
|
42,379,356
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
3,986,000
|
3,901,000
|
|||||
Intangible
assets - net
|
2,599,295
|
2,782,188
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
24,189,248
|
22,427,934
|
|||||
Prepaid
pension costs
|
1,655,362
|
1,655,362
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
2,938,523
|
3,678,100
|
|||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$
|
262,694,820
|
$
|
242,055,917
|
See
notes
to consolidated financial statements.
-2-
BEL
FUSE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|||||||
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|||||||
Current
Liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
19,771,545
|
$
|
14,560,827
|
|||
Accrued
expenses
|
13,198,695
|
10,667,558
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
-
|
1,412,000
|
|||||
Income
taxes payable
|
12,301,445
|
9,840,295
|
|||||
Dividends
payable
|
570,000
|
548,000
|
|||||
Total
Current Liabilities
|
45,841,685
|
37,028,680
|
|||||
Long-term
Liabilities:
|
|||||||
Minimum
pension obligation
|
3,822,020
|
3,450,688
|
|||||
Total
Liabilities
|
49,663,705
|
40,479,368
|
|||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
|||||||
Stockholders'
Equity:
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock, no par value, authorized 1,000,000 shares; none
issued
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Class
A common stock, par value $.10 per share - authorized
10,000,000 shares;
outstanding 2,702,677 and 2,702,677 shares, respectively
(net of 1,072,769
treasury shares)
|
270,268
|
270,268
|
|||||
Class
B common stock, par value $.10 per share - authorized
30,000,000 shares;
outstanding 9,107,453 and 9,013,264 shares, respectively
(net of 3,218,307
treasury shares)
|
910,746
|
901,327
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
30,756,822
|
31,713,608
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
179,649,971
|
167,991,188
|
|||||
Deferred
stock-based compensation
|
-
|
(3,562,709
|
)
|
||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
1,443,308
|
4,262,867
|
|||||
Total
Stockholders' Equity
|
213,031,115
|
201,576,549
|
|||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
$
|
262,694,820
|
$
|
242,055,917
|
See
notes
to consolidated financial statements.
-3-
BEL
FUSE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||||||||
Six
Months Ended
June
30,
|
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Net
Sales
|
$
|
121,100,346
|
$
|
102,983,706
|
$
|
66,474,098
|
$
|
57,545,421
|
|||||
Costs
and expenses:
|
|||||||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
90,248,564
|
73,380,908
|
50,261,675
|
40,692,097
|
|||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
19,610,167
|
15,839,939
|
10,232,982
|
8,618,636
|
|||||||||
Casualty
loss
|
1,097,271
|
-
|
133,480
|
-
|
|||||||||
110,956,002
|
89,220,847
|
60,628,137
|
49,310,733
|
||||||||||
Income
from operations
|
10,144,344
|
13,762,859
|
5,845,961
|
8,234,688
|
|||||||||
Interest
and financing expense
|
(44,386
|
)
|
(207,469
|
)
|
(17,186
|
)
|
(140,319
|
)
|
|||||
Gain
on sale of marketable securities, net
|
5,151,039
|
-
|
5,239,519
|
-
|
|||||||||
Interest
income
|
1,173,758
|
632,650
|
661,162
|
407,306
|
|||||||||
Earnings
before provision for income taxes
|
16,424,755
|
14,188,040
|
11,729,456
|
8,501,675
|
|||||||||
Income
tax provision
|
3,664,000
|
3,206,000
|
2,966,000
|
1,833,000
|
|||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
12,760,755
|
$
|
10,982,040
|
$
|
8,763,456
|
$
|
6,668,675
|
|||||
Earnings
per common share - basic
|
$
|
1.08
|
$
|
0.96
|
$
|
0.74
|
$
|
0.58
|
|||||
Earnings
per common share - diluted
|
$
|
1.08
|
$
|
0.95
|
$
|
0.74
|
$
|
0.58
|
|||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding - basic
|
11,768,667
|
11,420,305
|
11,796,484
|
11,468,398
|
|||||||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding - diluted
|
11,829,885
|
11,519,992
|
11,845,259
|
11,532,455
|
See
notes
to consolidated financial statements.
-4-
BEL
FUSE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
|
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other
|
Deferred
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Compre-
|
Compre-
|
Class
A
|
Class
B
|
Additional
|
Stock-
|
||||||||||||||||||||
hensive
|
Retained
|
hensive
|
Common
|
Common
|
Paid-In
|
Based
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
Income
|
Earnings
|
Income
|
Stock
|
Stock
|
Capital
|
Compensation
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
January 1, 2005
|
$
|
178,461,296
|
$
|
149,949,283
|
$
|
5,386,512
|
$
|
270,268
|
$
|
866,059
|
$
|
21,989,174
|
$
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
4,115,508
|
20,028
|
4,095,480
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax
benefits arising from the non-qualified disposition of incentive
stock options
|
429,802
|
429,802
|
-
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
dividends on Class A common
stock
|
(430,940
|
)
|
(430,940
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
dividends on Class B common stock
|
(1,760,432
|
)
|
(1,760,432
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of restricted common stock
|
5,214,392
|
15,240
|
5,199,152
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred
stock-based compensation - net of taxes
|
(3,810,840
|
)
|
(3,810,840
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Currency
translation adjustment
|
(669,153
|
)
|
$
|
(669,153
|
)
|
(669,153
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Decrease
in unrealized gain or loss on marketable securities -net of
taxes
|
(454,492
|
)
|
(454,492
|
)
|
(454,492
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense - net of taxes
|
248,131
|
248,131
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
20,233,277
|
20,233,277
|
20,233,277
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
$
|
19,109,632
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2005
|
201,576,549
|
167,991,188
|
4,262,867
|
270,268
|
901,327
|
31,713,608
|
(3,562,709
|
)
|
See
notes
to consolidated financial statements.
-5-
BEL
FUSE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Continued)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Total
|
|
Compre-
hensive
Income
|
|
Retained
Earnings |
|
Accumulated
Other
Compre-
hensive
Income
|
|
Class
A
Common
Stock
|
|
Class
B
Common
Stock
|
|
Additional
Paid-In
Capital
|
|
Deferred
Stock-
Based
Compensation
|
|||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
1,887,037
|
7,259
|
1,879,778
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax
benefits arising from the non-qualified disposition of incentive
stock
options
|
112,345
|
112,345
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
dividends on Class A common stock
|
(215,470
|
)
|
(215,470
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
dividends on Class B common stock
|
(886,502
|
)
|
(886,502
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Currency
translation adjustment
|
204,968
|
$
|
204,968
|
204,968
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Decrease
in unrealized gain or loss on marketable securities -net
of
taxes
|
(3,024,527
|
)
|
(3,024,527
|
)
|
(3,024,527
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of restricted common stock
|
-
|
2,160
|
(2,160
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense - net of tax
|
615,960
|
615,960
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Adoption
of SFAS 123 (R)
|
-
|
(3,562,709
|
)
|
3,562,709
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
12,760,755
|
12,760,755
|
12,760,755
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
$
|
9,941,196
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
June 30, 2006
|
$
|
213,031,115
|
$
|
179,649,971
|
$
|
1,443,308
|
$
|
270,268
|
$
|
910,746
|
$
|
30,756,822
|
$
|
-
|
See
notes
to consolidated financial statements.
-6-
BEL
FUSE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
Six
Months Ended
June
30,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
12,760,755
|
$
|
10,982,040
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
4,775,968
|
4,502,560
|
|||||
Casualty
loss
|
1,097,271
|
-
|
|||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
790,960
|
-
|
|||||
Excess
tax benefits from share-based payment
arrangements
|
(112,345
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Gain
on sale of marketable securities
|
(5,151,039
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Other
|
441,869
|
531,373
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
(548,000
|
)
|
(1,423,000
|
)
|
|||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities (net of
acquisitions)
|
(5,367,143
|
)
|
(650,121
|
)
|
|||
Net
Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
8,688,296
|
13,942,852
|
|||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|||||||
Purchase
of property, plant and equipment
|
(4,333,017
|
)
|
(3,405,163
|
)
|
|||
Purchase
of marketable securities
|
(729,088
|
)
|
(643,424
|
)
|
|||
Payment
for acquisitions - net of cash acquired
|
(2,692,974
|
)
|
(20,340,853
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from sale of marketable securities
|
24,489,966
|
-
|
|||||
Net
Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing
Activities
|
16,734,887
|
(24,389,440
|
)
|
See
notes
to consolidated financial statements.
-7-
BEL
FUSE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
Six
Months Ended
|
|||||||
June
30,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from borrowings
|
-
|
8,000,000
|
|||||
Loan
repayments
|
-
|
(15,360,694
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options
|
1,887,037
|
2,067,330
|
|||||
Dividends
paid to common shareholders
|
(1,104,078
|
)
|
(1,086,095
|
)
|
|||
Excess
tax benefits from share-based payment
arrangements
|
112,345
|
-
|
|||||
Net
Cash Provided By (Used In) Financing
Activities
|
895,304
|
(6,379,459
|
)
|
||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash
|
130,150
|
(320,328
|
)
|
||||
|
|||||||
Net
Increase (decrease) in Cash and Cash
Equivalents
|
26,448,637
|
(17,146,375
|
)
|
||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents - beginning of year
|
51,997,634
|
71,197,891
|
|||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents - end of year
|
$
|
78,446,271
|
$
|
54,051,516
|
|||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities (net of acquisitions) consist
of:
|
|||||||
Increase
in accounts receivable
|
$
|
(7,931,062
|
)
|
$
|
(3,735,125
|
)
|
|
Increase
in inventories
|
(5,853,897
|
)
|
(1,181,135
|
)
|
|||
(Increase)
decrease in prepaid expenses and other current
assets
|
(1,213,199
|
)
|
480,706
|
||||
Increase
in other assets
|
(359,959
|
)
|
(624,818
|
)
|
|||
Increase
in accounts
payable
|
5,193,397
|
3,075,709
|
|||||
Increase
in income taxes payable
|
2,573,495
|
1,925,559
|
|||||
Increase
(decrease) in accrued expenses
|
2,224,082
|
(591,017
|
)
|
||||
$
|
(5,367,143
|
)
|
$
|
(650,121
|
)
|
See
notes
to consolidated financial statements.
-8-
BEL
FUSE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Concluded)
|
||||
(Unaudited)
|
Six
Months Ended
|
|||||||
June
30,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Supplementary
information:
|
|||||||
Cash
paid during the year for:
|
|||||||
Income
taxes
|
$
|
1,240,000
|
$
|
2,389,322
|
|||
Interest
|
$
|
44,000
|
$
|
207,469
|
|||
Details
of acquisitions:
|
|||||||
Fair
value of assets acquired (excluding cash acquired of $311,856
in
2005)
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
6,021,377
|
|||
Intangibles
|
446,571
|
2,255,905
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
2,000,000
|
12,546,080
|
|||||
Acquisition
costs
|
2,446,571
|
20,823,362
|
|||||
Less:
Amounts paid (held back) on acquisition
payment
|
514,403
|
(482,509
|
)
|
||||
Amounts
accrued
|
(268,000
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Cash
paid for acquisitions
|
$
|
2,692,974
|
$
|
20,340,853
|
See
notes
to consolidated financial statements.
-9-
BEL
FUSE
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BASIS
OF
PRESENTATION AND ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The
consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2006, and the consolidated statements
of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the periods presented
herein have been prepared by Bel Fuse Inc. (the "Company" or "Bel") and are
unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting solely
of
normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial
position, results of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows
for all periods presented have been made. The information for the consolidated
balance sheet as of December 31, 2005 was derived from audited financial
statements.
Accounting
Policies
DESCRIPTION
OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
- Bel
Fuse Inc. and subsidiaries operate in one industry with three geographic
reporting segments and are engaged in the design, manufacture and sale of
products used in local area networking, telecommunication, business equipment
and consumer electronic applications. The Company manages its operations
geographically through its three reporting units: North America, Asia and
Europe. Sales are predominantly in North America, Europe and Asia.
PRINCIPLES
OF CONSOLIDATION
- The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
wholly owned subsidiaries, including businesses acquired since their respective
dates of acquisition. All intercompany transactions and balances have been
eliminated.
USE
OF
ESTIMATES - The
preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
CASH
EQUIVALENTS - Cash
equivalents include short-term investments in U.S. treasury bills and commercial
paper with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased. At
June
30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, cash equivalents approximated $34,966,000 and
$13,444,000, respectively.
MARKETABLE
SECURITIES - The
Company classifies its equity securities as "available for sale", and
accordingly, reflects unrealized gains and losses, net of deferred income taxes,
as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income.
The
fair
values of marketable securities are based on quoted market prices. Realized
gains or losses from the sale of marketable securities are based on the specific
identification method.
-10-
ACQUISITION
EXPENSES - The
Company capitalizes all direct costs associated with proposed acquisitions.
If
the proposed acquisitions are consummated, such costs will be included as a
component of the overall cost of the acquisition. Such costs are expensed at
such time as the Company deems the consummation of a proposed acquisition to
be
unsuccessful.
FOREIGN
CURRENCY TRANSLATION - The
functional currency for some foreign operations is the local currency. Assets
and liabilities of foreign operations are translated at balance sheet date
rates
of exchange and income, expense and cash flow items are translated at the
average exchange rate for the period. Translation adjustments are recorded
in
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The U.S. Dollar is used as the
functional currency for certain foreign operations that conduct their business
in U.S. Dollars. A combination of current and historical exchange rates is
used
in measuring the local currency transactions of these subsidiaries and the
resulting exchange adjustments are included in the statement of operations.
Current exchange rates are used for all foreign subsidiaries except for two
subsidiaries in the Far East which use both current and historical exchange
rates. Realized foreign currency (gains) were $(203,000) and ($105,000) for
the
six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, and $(245,000) and ($25,000) for the
three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and have been expensed
in the consolidated statements of operations included in selling, general and
administration expense.
CONCENTRATION
OF CREDIT RISK - Financial
instruments which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit
risk consist principally of accounts receivable and temporary cash investments.
The Company grants credit to customers that are primarily original equipment
manufacturers and to subcontractors of original equipment manufacturers based
on
an evaluation of the customer's financial condition, without requiring
collateral. Exposure to losses on receivables is principally dependent on each
customer's financial condition. The Company controls its exposure to credit
risk
through credit approvals, credit limits and monitoring procedures and
establishes allowances for anticipated losses.
The
Company places its temporary cash investments with quality financial
institutions and commercial issuers of short-term paper and, by policy, limits
the amount of credit exposure in any one financial instrument.
INVENTORIES
- Inventories
are stated at the lower of weighted average cost or market.
REVENUE
RECOGNITION -
The
Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the guidance contained in SEC
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, "Revenue Recognition in Financial
Statements". Revenue is recognized when the product has been delivered and
title
and risk of loss has passed to the customer, collection of the resulting
receivable is deemed probable by management, persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists and the sales price is fixed and determinable. Substantially
all of the Company's shipments are FCA (free carrier) which provides for title
to pass upon delivery to the customer's freight carrier. Some product is shipped
DDP/DDU with title passing when the product arrives at the customer's
dock.
-11-
For
certain customers, the Company provides consigned inventory, either at the
customer’s facility or at a third party warehouse. Sales of consigned inventory
are recorded when the customer withdraws inventory from consignment.
During
all periods in 2006 and 2005, inventory on consignment was
immaterial.
The
Company typically has a twelve-month warranty policy for workmanship defects.
Warranty returns have historically averaged at or below 1% of annual net sales.
The Company establishes warranty reserves when a warranty issue becomes known
as
warranty claims have historically been immaterial. No general reserves for
warranties have been established.
The
Company is not contractually obligated to accept returns except for defective
product or in instances where the product does not meet the customer's quality
specifications. However, the Company may permit its customers to return product
for other reasons. In these instances, the Company would generally require
a
significant cancellation penalty payment by the customer. The Company estimates
such returns, where applicable, based upon management's evaluation of historical
experience, market acceptance of products produced and known negotiations with
customers. Such estimates are deducted from gross sales and provided for at
the
time revenue is recognized.
GOODWILL-The
Company tests goodwill for impairment annually (during the fourth quarter),
using a fair value approach at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit is
an
operating segment or one level below an operating segment for which discrete
financial information is available and reviewed regularly by management. Assets
and liabilities of the Company have been assigned to the reporting units to
the
extent that they are employed in or are considered a liability related to the
operations of the reporting unit and were considered in determining the fair
value of the reporting unit.
DEPRECIATION
- Property,
plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Depreciation and amortization are calculated primarily using
the
declining-balance method for machinery and equipment and the straight-line
method for buildings and improvements over their estimated useful lives.
INCOME
TAXES - The
Company accounts for income taxes using an asset and liability approach under
which deferred income taxes are recognized by applying enacted tax rates
applicable to future years to the differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts and the tax bases of reported assets and
liabilities.
For
that
portion of foreign earnings that have not been repatriated, an income tax
provision has not been recorded for U.S. federal income taxes on the
undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries as such earnings are intended
to
be permanently reinvested in those operations. Such earnings would become
taxable in the United States upon the sale or liquidation of these foreign
subsidiaries or upon the repatriation of earnings.
-12-
The
principal items giving rise to deferred taxes are unrealized gains on marketable
securities available for sale, the use of accelerated depreciation methods
for
machinery and equipment, timing differences between book and tax amortization
of
intangible assets and goodwill and certain expenses which have been deducted
for
financial reporting purposes which are not currently deductible for income
tax
purposes.
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
- The
Company has one stock-based compensation plan under which both incentive
stock-options and restricted stock awards are granted to employees and
directors. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company accounts for stock based
compensation under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No.
123
(R), "Share-Based Payment". The Company adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified
prospective method. Under modified prospective application, this SFAS applies
to
new awards and to awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after the required
effective date. Additionally, compensation cost for the portion of the awards
for which the requisite service has not been rendered that are outstanding
as of
the required effective date shall be recognized as the requisite service
is
rendered on or after the required effective date. The compensation cost for
the
portion of awards shall be based on the grant-date fair value of those awards
as
calculated for either recognition or pro forma disclosures under SFAS 123.
Changes to the grant-date fair value of equity awards granted before the
required effective date of this Statement are precluded. The compensation
cost
for those earlier awards shall be attributed to periods beginning on or after
the required effective date of this SFAS using the attribution method that
was
used under SFAS 123, except that the method of recognizing forfeitures only
as
they occur shall not be continued. Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company
accounted for stock option grants issued to employees in accordance with
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 "Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees", and had adopted the disclosure only requirements of SFAS No.
123,
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation", as amended by SFAS No. 148,
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure, an amendment
of FASB Statement No. 123." As such, for periods prior to January 1, 2006,
the
Company presents pro forma net earnings and earnings per share as if the
fair-value-based method of accounting had been applied under SFAS No.
123.
During
2005 and 2006, the Company issued 152,400 and 21,600 class B common shares,
respectively, under a restricted stock plan to various officers and employees.
The shares vest 25% after two years of employment with an additional 25% vesting
in each of years three through five. This resulted in pre-tax compensation
expense of $564,000 and $296,000 ($413,000 and $226,000, net of tax benefit)
for
the six and three months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. The balance of
$3,600,000 of deferred stock-based compensation, net of taxes, is included
within paid-in-capital on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.
Additionally, stock based compensation expense related to incentive stock
options amounted to $226,000 and $113,000 (pre-tax) for the six and three months
ended June 30, 2006, respectively.
-13-
Prior
to
January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS
No.
123. Had compensation cost for the Company's stock option plan been determined
based on the fair value at the grant date for awards for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2005 consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123,
the
Company's net earnings and earnings per share would have been reduced to the
pro
forma amounts indicated below:
Three
Months
Ended
June
30, 2005
|
Six
Months
Ended
June
30, 2005
|
||||||
Net
earnings - as reported
|
$
|
6,668,675
|
$
|
10,982,040
|
|||
Add:
Stock-based compensation
|
|||||||
expense
included in net income,
|
|||||||
net
of taxes, as reported
|
|||||||
Deduct:
Total stock-based
|
|||||||
employee
compensation expense
|
|||||||
determined
under fair value based
|
|||||||
method
for all awards,
|
|||||||
net
of taxes
|
(160,868
|
)
|
(321,736
|
)
|
|||
Net
earnings- pro forma
|
$
|
6,507,807
|
$
|
10,660,304
|
|||
Earnings
per common share -
|
|||||||
basic-as
reported
|
$
|
0.58
|
$
|
0.96
|
|||
Earnings
per common share -
|
|||||||
basic-pro
forma
|
$
|
0.57
|
$
|
0.93
|
|||
Earnings
per common share -
|
|||||||
diluted-as
reported
|
$
|
0.58
|
$
|
0.95
|
|||
Earnings
per common share -
|
|||||||
diluted-pro
forma
|
$
|
0.56
|
$
|
0.93
|
-14-
RESEARCH
AND DEVELOPMENT - Research
and development costs are expensed as incurred, and are included in cost of
sales. Generally all research and development is performed internally for the
benefit of the Company. The Company does not perform such activities for others.
Research and development costs include salaries, building maintenance and
utilities, rents, materials, administration costs and miscellaneous other items.
Research and development expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and
2005 amounted to $3.5 million and $3.8 million, respectively, and for the three
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 amounted to $1.6 million and $1.9 million,
respectively.
EVALUATION
OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS - The
Company reviews property and equipment and finite-lived intangible assets for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying
value may not be recoverable in accordance with guidance in SFAS No. 144,
“Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” If the
carrying value of the long-lived asset exceeds the present value of the related
estimated future cash flows, the asset would be adjusted to its fair value
and
an impairment loss would be charged to operations in the period
identified.
CASUALTY
LOSS - During
the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company incurred a $1.1 million pre-tax
casualty loss primarily for uninsured raw materials destroyed by a fire at
a
leased manufacturing facility in the Dominican Republic.
EARNINGS
PER SHARE - Basic
earnings per common share are computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings
per common share are computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average
number of common shares and potential common shares outstanding during the
period. Potential common shares used in computing diluted earnings per share
relate to stock options and warrants which, if exercised, would have a dilutive
effect on earnings per share.
The
following table includes a reconciliation of shares used in the calculation
of
basic and diluted earnings per share:
Six
Months Ended
|
Three
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding - basic
|
11,768,667
|
11,420,305
|
11,796,484
|
11,468,398
|
|||||||||
Dilutive
impact of stock options and
|
|||||||||||||
unvested
restricted stock awards
|
61,218
|
99,687
|
48,775
|
64,057
|
|||||||||
Weighted
average shares oustanding - diluted
|
11,829,885
|
11,519,992
|
11,845,259
|
11,532,455
|
During
the six and three months ended June 30, 2006, 14,000 and 14,000 outstanding
options were not included in the foregoing computations because they were
antidilutive.
-15-
FAIR
VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS - For
financial instruments, including cash, marketable securities, accounts
receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, it was assumed that the
carrying amount approximated fair value because of the short maturities of
such
instruments. Interest rates that are currently available to the Company for
issuance of debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to
estimate fair value for bank debt. Management believes that the carrying amount
of bank debt is a reasonable estimate of its fair value.
2. ACQUISITIONS
On
June
30, 2005, the Company acquired the common stock of Netwatch s.r.o., located
in
Prague, the Czech Republic, for approximately $1.9 million in cash of which
$0.5
million was due to the sellers and was paid by the Company during June 2006.
Netwatch s.r.o. is a designer and manufacturer of high-performance fiber optic
and copper cable assemblies for data and telecommunication applications.
Approximately $1.0 million of goodwill arose from the transaction which is
included in the Company’s European reporting unit.
The
acquisition has been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting
and,
accordingly, the results of operation of Netwatch s.r.o. have been included
in
the Company’s consolidated financial statements from June 30, 2005.
There
was
no in process research and development acquired as part of this
acquisition.
On
March
22, 2005, the Company acquired the common stock of Galaxy Power Inc. ("Galaxy"),
located in Westborough, Massachusetts, for approximately $19.0 million in cash
including transaction costs of approximately $0.4 million. Galaxy is a designer
and manufacturer of high-density DC-DC converters for distributed power and
telecommunication applications. The purchase price has been allocated to both
tangible and intangible assets and liabilities based on estimated fair values
after considering an independent formal appraisal. Approximately $11.2 million
of goodwill and $2.6 million of identifiable intangible assets arose from the
transaction and are included in the Company’s North American reporting unit. The
identifiable intangible assets and related deferred tax liabilities are being
amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives.
The
acquisition has been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting
and,
accordingly, the results of operations of Galaxy have been included in the
Company's consolidated financial statements from March 22, 2005.
There
was
no in process research and development acquired as part of this
acquisition.
-16-
The
following unaudited pro forma summary results of operations assume that Galaxy
and Netwatch s.r.o. had been acquired as of January 1, 2005 (in thousands,
except per share data):
SIx
Months Ended
June
30,
2005
|
||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
108,295
|
||
Net
earnings
|
10,758
|
|||
Earnings
per share - diluted
|
0.93
|
The
information above is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations
that would have occurred if the acquisitions had been consummated as of January
1, 2005. Such information should not be construed as a representation of the
future results of operations of the Company.
A
condensed combined balance sheet of the major assets and liabilities of Galaxy
and Netwatch s.r.o., as of their acquisition dates is as
follows:
Cash
|
$
|
311,856
|
||
Accounts
receivable
|
3,687,331
|
|||
Inventories
|
2,862,571
|
|||
Prepaid
expenses
|
96,120
|
|||
Income
taxes receivable
|
5,488
|
|||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
1,545,526
|
|||
Other
assets
|
32,083
|
|||
Deferred
tax asset
|
1,392,850
|
|||
Goodwill
|
12,546,080
|
|||
Intangible
assets
|
1,960,000
|
|||
Notes
payable
|
(860,694
|
)
|
||
Accounts
payable
|
(2,129,165
|
)
|
||
Accrued
expenses
|
(465,002
|
)
|
||
Net
assets acquired
|
$
|
20,985,044
|
-17-
3. GOODWILL
AND OTHER INTANGIBLES
Goodwill
represents the excess of the purchase price and related acquisition costs over
the value assigned to the net tangible and other intangible assets with finite
lives acquired in a business acquisition.
Effective
January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets". Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill and intangible assets deemed
to
have indefinite lives are no longer amortized, but are subject to, at a minimum,
an annual impairment test. If the carrying value of goodwill or intangible
assets exceeds its fair market value, an impairment loss would be recorded.
Other
intangibles include patents, product information, covenants not-to-compete
and
supply agreements. Amounts assigned to these intangibles have been determined
by
management. Management considered a number of factors in determining the
allocations, including valuations and independent appraisals. Other intangibles
are being amortized over 1 to 10 years. Amortization expense was $1,299,000
and
$981,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively and
$504,000 and $666,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and
2005.
Under
the
terms of the E-Power Ltd (“E-Power”) and Current Concepts, Inc. (“Current
Concepts”) acquisition agreements of May 11, 2001, the Company is required to
make contingent purchase price payments up to an aggregate of $7.6 million
should the acquired companies attain specified sales levels. During February
2006, E-Power was paid $2.0 million in contingent purchase price payments as
E-Power's sales, as defined, reached $15.0 million. An additional $4.0 million
will be paid if such sales reach $25.0 million on a cumulative basis through
May
2007. The contingent purchase price payments for E-Power are accounted for
as
additional purchase price and as an increase to goodwill when such payment
obligations are incurred. Current Concepts will be paid 16% of sales, as
defined, on the first $10.0 million of sales through May 2007. This $10 million
benchmark was reached during the second quarter of 2006 and therefore no
additional payments will be made. During the six months ended June 30, 2006
and
2005, the Company paid or accrued approximately $447,000 and $296,000,
respectively, in contingent purchase price payments to Current Concepts. During
the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company paid or accrued
approximately $268,000 and $182,000, respectively, in contingent purchase price
payments to Current Concepts. The contingent purchase price payments for Current
Concepts are accounted for as additional purchase price and as an increase
to
covenants not to compete within intangible assets when such payment obligations
are incurred.
-18-
The
changes in the carrying value of goodwill classified by geographic reporting
units, net of accumulated depreciation, for the six months ended June 30, 2006
and the year ended December 31, 2005 are as follows:
Total
|
Asia
|
North
America
|
Europe
|
||||||||||
Balance,
January 1, 2005
|
$
|
9,881,854
|
$
|
6,407,435
|
$
|
2,869,092
|
$
|
605,327
|
|||||
Goodwill
allocation
|
|||||||||||||
related
to acquisitions
|
12,546,080
|
-
|
11,543,846
|
1,002,234
|
|||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2005
|
22,427,934
|
6,407,435
|
14,412,938
|
1,607,561
|
|||||||||
Goodwill
allocation
|
|||||||||||||
related
to acquisitions
|
2,000,000
|
2,000,000
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Reclassification
to intangible asset
|
(670,000
|
)
|
-
|
(670,000
|
)
|
-
|
|||||||
Other
purchase price and foreign
|
|||||||||||||
exchange
adjustments
|
431,314
|
-
|
395,690
|
35,624
|
|||||||||
Balance,
June 30, 2006
|
$
|
24,189,248
|
$
|
8,407,435
|
$
|
14,138,628
|
$
|
1,643,185
|
The
components of intangible assets other than goodwill by geographic reporting
unit
are as follows:
|
December
31, 2005
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
Asia
|
North
America
|
|||||||||||||||||
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Gross
Carrying Amount
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
||||||||||||||
Patents
and Product
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Information
|
$
|
2,935,000
|
$
|
1,812,853
|
$
|
2,653,000
|
$
|
1,634,566
|
$
|
282,000
|
$
|
178,287
|
|||||||
Customer
relationships
|
1,160,000
|
178,833
|
-
|
-
|
1,160,000
|
178,833
|
|||||||||||||
Covenants
not-to-compete
|
5,021,034
|
4,342,160
|
4,221,034
|
3,813,589
|
800,000
|
528,571
|
|||||||||||||
$
|
9,116,034
|
$
|
6,333,846
|
$
|
6,874,034
|
$
|
5,448,155
|
$
|
2,242,000
|
$
|
885,691
|
|
June
30, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Total
|
Asia
|
North
America
|
||||||||||||||||
|
Gross
Carrying
Amount
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Gross
Carrying Amount
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
Gross
Carrying Amount
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
|||||||||||||
Patents
and Product
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Information
|
$
|
2,935,000
|
$
|
2,042,808
|
$
|
2,653,000
|
$
|
1,850,397
|
$
|
282,000
|
$
|
192,411
|
|||||||
Customer
relationships
|
1,830,000
|
465,124
|
-
|
-
|
1,830,000
|
465,124
|
|||||||||||||
Covenants
not-to-compete
|
5,467,605
|
5,125,378
|
4,667,605
|
4,408,711
|
800,000
|
716,667
|
|||||||||||||
$
|
10,232,605
|
$
|
7,633,310
|
$
|
7,320,605
|
$
|
6,259,108
|
$
|
2,912,000
|
$
|
1,374,202
|
-19-
Estimated
amortization expense for intangible assets for the next five years is as
follows:
Year
Ending
December
31,
|
Estimated
Amortization
Expense
|
|||
2006
|
$
|
563,274
|
||
2007
|
809,277
|
|||
2008
|
534,287
|
|||
2009
|
427,596
|
|||
2010
|
134,904
|
2006
represents amortization from July 1, 2006 through December 31,
2006.
4. MARKETABLE
SECURITIES
The
Company has cumulatively acquired a total of 4,926,000 shares, or 5%, of
the
common stock of Toko, Inc. (“Toko”) at a total purchase price of $15.6 million.
Of these amounts, the Company acquired 101,000 shares at a cost of $329,000
during July and August 2006 and currently plans to acquire additional shares.
Toko had a market capitalization of approximately $327 million as of August
1,
2006. These purchases are reflected on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet
as marketable securities . These marketable securities are considered to
be
available for sale under SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in
Debt and Equity Securities”. Thus, as of June 30, 2006, the Company has recorded
an unrealized gain, net of income taxes, of approximately $.5 million which
is
included in accumulated other comprehensive income as stated in the consolidated
statement of stockholders’ equity. In connection with this transaction, the
Company is obligated to pay an investment banker’s advisory fee to a third party
of 20% of the appreciation in the stock of Toko, or $1 million, whichever
is
lower. As of June 30, 2006, the Company has accrued a fee in the amount of
approximately $150,000. Such amount has been deferred within other assets.
If
the proposed acquisition of Toko is consummated, the fee will be capitalized
as
part of the acquisition costs. Such amount will be expensed at such time
as the
Company deems the consummation of the proposed acquisition to be
unsuccessful.
The
Company acquired a total of 2,037,500 shares of the common stock of Artesyn
Technologies, Inc. (“Artesyn”) at a total purchase price of $16,331,469. On
April 28, 2006, Artesyn was acquired by Emerson Network Power for $11.00 per
share in cash. During the second quarter of 2006, in connection with the
Company's sale of its Artesyn common stock, the Company recognized a gain of
approximately $5.2 million, net of investment banker’s advisory fees of
$850,000. The Company accrued bonuses of $1.0 million in connection with the
gain. For financial statement presentation purposes, the $1.0 million bonus
was
classified within selling, general and administrative expenses and will be
paid
to key employees by December 31, 2006.
-20-
At
June
30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, marketable securities have a
cost
of approximately $15,122,000 and $32,893,000, an estimated fair value of
approximately $15,874,000 and $38,463,000 and gross unrealized gains of
approximately $752,000 and $5,570,000. Such unrealized gains are included,
net
of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company had realized
gains of $5.2 million and realized losses of $88,000 for the six months ended
June 30, 2006.
5.
|
INVENTORIES
|
The
components of inventories are as follows:
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Raw
materials
|
$
|
21,073,927
|
$
|
19,342,703
|
|||
Work
in progress
|
7,767,316
|
2,515,174
|
|||||
Finished
goods
|
10,032,050
|
11,089,226
|
|||||
$
|
38,873,293
|
$
|
32,947,103
|
6. BUSINESS
SEGMENT INFORMATION
The
Company operates in one industry with three reportable segments. The segments
are geographic and include North America, Asia and Europe. The primary criteria
by which financial performance is evaluated and resources are allocated are
revenues and operating income. The following is a summary of key financial
data:
Six
Months Ended
|
Three
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Total
segment revenues
|
|||||||||||||
North
America
|
$
|
39,531,004
|
$
|
37,119,158
|
$
|
21,036,118
|
$
|
19,158,205
|
|||||
Asia
|
88,243,885
|
71,509,916
|
49,338,286
|
40,691,564
|
|||||||||
Europe
|
13,355,532
|
7,414,308
|
7,670,699
|
3,415,866
|
|||||||||
Total
segment revenues
|
141,130,421
|
116,043,382
|
78,045,103
|
63,265,635
|
|||||||||
Reconciling
items:
|
|||||||||||||
Intersegment
revenues
|
(20,030,075
|
)
|
(13,059,676
|
)
|
(11,571,005
|
)
|
(5,720,214
|
)
|
|||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
121,100,346
|
$
|
102,983,706
|
$
|
66,474,098
|
$
|
57,545,421
|
|||||
Income
(loss) from Operations:
|
|||||||||||||
North
America
|
$
|
(927,078
|
)
|
$
|
3,841,040
|
$
|
874,823
|
$
|
2,556,574
|
||||
Asia
|
10,430,590
|
9,799,777
|
4,865,271
|
5,714,850
|
|||||||||
Europe
|
640,832
|
122,042
|
105,867
|
(36,736
|
)
|
||||||||
$
|
10,144,344
|
$
|
13,762,859
|
$
|
5,845,961
|
$
|
8,234,688
|
-21-
7.
|
DEBT
|
a. Short-term
debt
Previously
the Company had available one domestic line of credit of $10 million. During
March 2005, the Company borrowed $8 million against the line of credit to
partially finance the acquisition of Galaxy. The outstanding balance was
paid
off in its entirety on June 20, 2005. During July 2005, the Company amended
its
credit agreement to increase the line of credit to $20 million, which expires
on
July 21, 2008. During October 2005, the Company borrowed $4 million against
the
line of credit. The outstanding balance was paid off in its entirety during
December 2005. There was no balance outstanding as of June 30, 2006. At that
date, the entire $20 million line of credit was available to the Company
to
borrow. The loan is collateralized with a first priority security interest
in
and lien on 65% of all the issued and outstanding shares of the capital stock
of
certain of the foreign subsidiaries of the Company and all other personal
property and certain real property of the Company. The loan bears interest
at
LIBOR plus 0.75% to 1.25% based on certain financial statement ratios maintained
by the Company. As of June 30, 2006 the Company is in compliance with its
debt
covenants.
The
Company’s Hong Kong subsidiary has an unsecured line of credit of approximately
$2 million which was unused as of June 30, 2006. The line of credit expires
during July 2007. Borrowing on the line of credit is guaranteed by the U.S.
parent. The line of credit bears interest at a rate determined by the bank
as
the financing is extended.
b. Long-term
debt
On
March
21, 2003, the Company entered into a $10 million secured term loan, which
was
paid off in June 2005. The loan was used to partially finance the Company's
acquisition of Insilco's Passive Components Group. This term loan facility
is no
longer available to the Company.
For
the
six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company recorded interest expense
of $44,000 and $207,000, respectively. For the three months ended June 30,
2006
and 2005, the Company recorded interest expense of $17,000 and $140,000,
respectively.
8. ACCRUED
EXPENSES
Accrued
expenses consist of the following:
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Sales
commissions
|
$
|
2,022,569
|
$
|
1,812,135
|
|||
Investment
banking commissions
|
150,426
|
1,105,510
|
|||||
Subcontracting
labor
|
1,799,445
|
1,597,279
|
|||||
Salaries,
bonuses and
|
|||||||
related
benefits
|
3,382,995
|
2,642,729
|
|||||
Other
|
5,843,260
|
3,509,905
|
|||||
$
|
13,198,695
|
$
|
10,667,558
|
-22-
9. RETIREMENT
FUND AND PROFIT SHARING PLAN
The
Company maintains a domestic profit sharing plan and a contributory stock
ownership and savings 401(K) plan, which combines stock ownership and individual
voluntary savings provisions to provide retirement benefits for plan
participants. The plan provides for participants to voluntarily contribute
a
portion of their compensation, subject to certain legal maximums. The Company
will match, based on a sliding scale, up to $350 for the first $600 contributed
by each participant. Matching contributions plus additional discretionary
contributions is made with Company stock purchased in the open market. The
expense for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 amounted to
approximately $280,000 and $248,000, respectively. The expense for the three
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 amounted to approximately $144,000 and
$137,000, respectively. As of June 30, 2006, the plans owned 18,374 and 138,083
shares of Bel Fuse Inc. Class A and Class B common stock,
respectively.
The
Company's Far East subsidiaries have a retirement fund covering substantially
all of their Hong Kong based full-time employees. Eligible employees contribute
up to 5% of salary to the fund. In addition, the Company may contribute an
amount up to 7% of eligible salary, as determined by Hong Kong government
regulations, in cash or Company stock. The expense for the six months ended
June
30, 2006 and 2005 amounted to approximately $351,000 and $208,000, respectively.
The expense for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 amounted to
approximately $169,000 and $105,000, respectively. As of June 30, 2006, the
fund
owned 3,323 and 17,342 shares of Bel Fuse Inc. Class A and Class B common
stock,
respectively.
The
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the "SERP" or the “Plan”) is designed to
provide a limited group of key management and highly compensated employees
of
the Company supplemental retirement and death benefits. The Plan was established
by the Company in 2002. Employees are selected at the sole discretion of
the
Board of Directors of the Company to participate in the Plan. The Plan is
unfunded. The Company utilizes life insurance to partially cover its obligations
under the Plan. The benefits available under the Plan vary according to when
and
how the participant terminates employment with the Company. If a participant
retires (with the prior written consent of the Company) on his normal retirement
date (65 years old, 20 years of service, and 5 years of Plan participation),
his
normal retirement benefit under the Plan would be annual payments equal to
40%
of his average base compensation (calculated using compensation from the
highest
5 consecutive calendar years of Plan participation), payable in monthly
installments for the remainder of his life. If a participant retires early
from
the Company (55 years old, 20 years of service, and 5 years of Plan
participation), his early retirement benefit under the Plan would be an amount
(i) calculated as if his early retirement date were in fact his normal
retirement date, (ii) multiplied by a fraction, with the numerator being
the
actual years of service the participant has with the Company and the denominator
being the years of service the participant would have had if he had retired
at
age 65, and (iii) actuarially reduced to reflect the early retirement date.
If a
participant dies prior to receiving 120 monthly payments under the Plan,
his
beneficiary would be entitled to continue receiving benefits for the shorter
of
(i) the time necessary to complete 120 monthly payments or (ii) 60 months.
If a
participant dies while employed by the Company, his beneficiary would receive,
as a survivor benefit, an annual amount equal to (i) 100% of the participant’s
annual base salary at date of death for one year, and (ii) 50% of the
participant’s annual base salary at date of death for each of the following 4
years, each payable in monthly installments. The Plan also provides for
disability benefits, and a forfeiture of benefits if a participant terminates
employment for reasons other than those contemplated under the Plan. The
expense
for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 amounted to approximately
$640,000 and $341,000, respectively. The expense for the three months ended
June
30, 2006 and 2005 amounted to approximately $226,000 and $121,000, respectively.
-23-
The
components of SERP expense are as follows:
Six
Months Ended
|
Three
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|||||||
Service
cost
|
$
|
486,000
|
$
|
154,000
|
$
|
173,000
|
$
|
55,000
|
|||||
Interest
cost
|
96,000
|
113,000
|
35,000
|
36,000
|
|||||||||
Amortization
of adjustments
|
58,000
|
74,000
|
18,000
|
30,000
|
|||||||||
Total
SERP expense
|
$
|
640,000
|
$
|
341,000
|
$
|
226,000
|
$
|
121,000
|
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
2006
|
|
2005
|
|||||
Balance
sheet amounts:
|
|||||||
Accrued
pension liability
|
$
|
3,822,020
|
$
|
3,450,688
|
|||
Intangible
asset
|
1,655,362
|
1,655,362
|
10.
SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
On
January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (R) "Share-Based Payment"
requiring the recognition of compensation expense in the Consolidated Statements
of Operations related to the fair value of its employee share-based options
and
awards. SFAS No. 123 (R) revises SFAS No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation" and supercedes APB Opinion No. 25 "Accounting for Stock Issued
to
Employees." SFAS No. 123(R) is supplemented by SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin
("SAB") No. 107 "Share-Based Payment." SAB No. 107 expresses the SEC staff's
views regarding the interaction between SFAS No. 123(R) and certain SEC rules
and regulations including the valuation of share-based payment
arrangements.
The
Company recognizes the cost of all employee stock options on a straight-line
attribution basis over their respective vesting periods, net of estimated
forfeitures. The Company has selected the modified prospective method of
transition; accordingly, prior periods have not been restated. Prior to adopting
SFAS No. 123(R), the Company applied APB Opinion No. 25, and related
interpretations in accounting for its stock-based compensation plans. All
employee stock options were granted at or above the grant date market price.
Accordingly, no compensation cost was recognized for fixed stock option
grants.
-24-
On
June
30, 2006, the Company has one stock-based compensation plan, which is described
below. During the six months and three months ended June 30, 2006, the adoption
of SFAS No. 123(R) resulted in incremental stock-based compensation expense
of
$226,000 and $113,000, respectively. The incremental stock-based compensation
expense caused the basic and diluted earnings per common share to decrease
by
$.02 and $.01 per share, respectively. In addition, in connection with the
adoption of SFAS No. 123 (R), net cash provided by operating activities
decreased and net cash provided by financing activities increased during
the six
months ended June 30, 2006 by $112,345 related to excess tax benefits from
stock-based payment arrangements.
The
aggregate compensation cost recognized in net earnings for stock based
compensation (including incentive stock options, restricted stock and dividends
on restricted stock, as further discussed below) amounted to $790,000 and
$-0-
for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. For the three
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 the aggregate compensation cost recognized
in net earnings amounted to $409,000 and $-0-. The Company did not use any
cash
to settle any equity instruments granted under share based arrangements during
the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.
Under
the
provisions of SFAS 123 (R), the recognition of deferred compensation as
a
component of equity representing the amount of unrecognized restricted
stock
expense that is reduced as expense is recognized at the date restricted
stock is
granted, is no longer required. Therefore, in the first quarter of 2006,
the
amount that had been in "Deferred compensation" in the Consolidated Balance
Sheet was reversed to zero.
Incentive
Stock Options
The
Company has a Qualified Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") which provides for
the
granting of "Incentive Stock Options" to key employees within the meaning
of
Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Company
believes that such awards better align the interest of its employees with
those
of its shareholders. The Plan provides for the issuance of 2,400,000 common
shares. Substantially all options outstanding become exercisable twenty-five
percent (25%) one
year
from the date of grant and twenty-five percent (25%) for each year of the
three
years thereafter. Upon exercise the Company will issue new shares. The exercise
price of the options granted pursuant to the Plan is not to be less than
100
percent of the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. An option
may not be exercised within one year from the date of grant, and in general,
no
option will be exercisable after five years from the date granted.
The
fair
value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average
assumptions used for grants in 2004, which was the last year options were
granted; dividends yield of 0.9%, expected volatility of 35% for Class
B;
risk-free interest rate of 5% and expected lives of 5 years. No options
were
granted during the year ended December 31, 2005 or during the six and three
months ended June 30, 2006. Expected lives of options previously granted
were
estimated using the historical exercise behavior of employees. Expected
volatilities are based on implied volatilities from historical volatility
of the
Company's stock. The Company uses historical data to estimate employee
forfeitures . The risk free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve
in
effect at the time of the grant.
-25-
A
summary
of option activity under the plan as of December 31, 2005 and changes during
the
six months ended June 30, 2006 is presented below:
Weighted
|
|||||||||||||
Average
|
|||||||||||||
Weighted
|
Remaining
|
Aggregate
|
|||||||||||
Average
|
Contractual
|
Intrinsic
|
|||||||||||
Options
|
Shares
|
Exercise
Price
|
Term
|
Value
|
|||||||||
Outstanding
at January 1, 2006
|
286,013
|
$
|
24.96
|
||||||||||
Granted
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(72,588
|
)
|
26.00
|
$
|
696,879
|
||||||||
Forfeited
or expired
|
(12,400
|
)
|
29.71
|
||||||||||
Outstanding
at June 30, 2006
|
201,025
|
$
|
24.29
|
1.5
|
$
|
1,712,676
|
|||||||
Exercisable
at June 30, 2006
|
90,025
|
$
|
23.12
|
1.5
|
$
|
872,235
|
During
the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 the Company received $1,887,037
and
$2,067,330 from the exercise of share options and realized tax benefits of
$112,000 and $190,000, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options
exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $696,879
and
$1,455,859, respectively. Stock compensation expense for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005 was $226,000 and $-0-.
A
summary
of the status of the Company's nonvested options as of December 31, 2005
and
changes during the six months ended June 30, 2006 is presented
below:
Weighted-Average
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
Grant-Date
|
|
||
Nonvested
Options
|
|
Options
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|||
Nonvested
at December 31, 2005
|
177,500
|
$
|
24.28
|
||||
Granted
|
-
|
||||||
Vested
|
(54,100
|
)
|
19.84
|
||||
Forfeited
|
(12,400
|
)
|
29.71
|
||||
Nonvested
at June 30, 2006
|
111,000
|
$
|
25.24
|
At
June
30, 2006 there was $278,883 of total unrecognized compensation cost related
to
non vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan.
The
cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2 years.
The
total fair value of shares vested during the six months ended June 30, 2006
and
2005 was $-0- and $-0-, respectively.
-26-
Restricted
Stock Awards
The
Company provides common stock awards to certain officers and key employees.
The
Company grants these awards, at its discretion, from the shares available
under
the Stock Option plan. The shares awarded are earned in 25% increments on
the
second, third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the award, respectively,
and
are distributed provided the employee has remained employed by the Company
through such anniversary dates; otherwise the unearned shares are forfeited.
The
market value of these shares at the date of award is recorded as compensation
expense on the straight-line method over the five-year periods from the
respective award dates, as adjusted for forfeitures of unvested awards. Deferred
stock-based compensation expense of $3.6 million associated with unearned
shares
under this plan as of June 30, 2006, is reported within Stockholders' equity
on
the Company's consolidated balance sheets, net of deferred tax benefit. Pretax
compensation expense was $564,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006
and
$248,000 for the year ended December 31, 2005.
A
summary
of the activity under the Restricted Stock Awards Plan as of December 31,
2005
and for the six months ended June 30, 2006 is presented below:
Weighted
|
|||||||||||||
Weighted
|
Average
|
||||||||||||
Average
|
Remaining
|
Aggregate
|
|||||||||||
Restricted
Stock
|
Award
|
Contractual
|
Intrinsic
|
||||||||||
Awards
|
Shares
|
Price
|
Term
|
Value
|
|||||||||
Outstanding
at January 1, 2006
|
152,400
|
$
|
35.64
|
||||||||||
Granted
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Awarded
|
21,600
|
30.00
|
|||||||||||
Forfeited
|
(4,000
|
)
|
37.00
|
||||||||||
Outstanding
at June 30, 2006
|
170,000
|
34.89
|
4.5
|
$
|
-
|
||||||||
Exercisable
at June 30, 2006
|
-
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
As
of
June 30, 2006 there was $5.0 million of total pre-tax unrecognized compensation
cost related to non-vested share based compensation arrangements granted
under
the restricted stock award plan; that cost is expected to be recognized over
a
period of 4.5 years.
The
Company's policy is to issue new shares to satisfy Restricted Stock Awards
and
incentive stock option exercises.
-27-
11.
COMMON STOCK
During
2000, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the purchase of up
to ten
percent (10%) of the Company’s outstanding Class B common shares. As of December
31, 2005, the Company had purchased and retired 23,600 Class B common shares
at
a cost of approximately $808,000 which reduced the number of Class B common
shares outstanding. No stock was repurchased during the six and three months
ended June 30, 2006.
The
Company maintains two classes of outstanding common stock, Class A Common
Stock
(“Class A”) and Class B Common Stock (“Class B”). The following is a summary of
the pertinent rights and privileges of each class outstanding:
·
|
Voting
- Class A receives one vote per share; Class B is
non-voting;
|
·
|
Dividends
(cash) - Cash dividends are payable at the discretion of the Board
of
Directors and is subject to a 5% provision whereby cash dividends
paid out
to Class B must be at least 5% higher per share annually than Class
A. At
the discretion of the Board of Directors, Class B may receive a
cash
dividend without Class A receiving a cash
dividend.
|
·
|
Dividends
(other than cash) and distributions in connection with any
recapitalization and upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up
of the
Company - Shared equally among Class A and Class B;
|
·
|
Mergers
and consolidations - Equal amount and form of consideration per
share
among Class A and Class B;
|
·
|
Class
B Protection - Any person or group that purchases 10% or more of
the
outstanding Class A (excluding certain shares, as defined) must
make a
public cash tender offer (within 90 days) to acquire additional
shares of
Class B to avoid disproportionate voting rights. Failure to do
so will
result in forfeiture of voting rights for those shares acquired
after the
recapitalization. Alternatively, the purchaser can sell Class A
shares to
reduce the purchaser's holdings below 10% (excluding shares owned
prior to
recapitalization). Above 10%, this protection transaction is triggered
every 5% (i.e., 15%, 20%, 25%,
etc.);
|
·
|
Convertibility
- Not convertible into another class of Common Stock or any other
security
by the Company, unless by resolution by the Board of Directors
to convert
such shares as a result of either class becoming excluded from
quotation
on NASDAQ, or if total outstanding shares of Class A falls below
10% of
the aggregate number of outstanding shares of both classes (in
which case,
all Class B shares will be automatically converted in Class A
shares).
|
-28-
·
|
Transferability
and trading - Both Class A and Class B are freely transferable
and
publicly traded on NASDAQ National
Market;
|
·
|
Subdivision
of shares - Any split, subdivision or combination of the outstanding
shares of Class A or Class B must be proportionately split with
the other
class in the same manner and on the same
basis.
|
12.
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive
income for the six and three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 consists
of:
Six
Months Ended
|
Three
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
12,760,755
|
$
|
10,982,040
|
$
|
8,763,456
|
$
|
6,668,675
|
|||||
Currency
translation adjustment
|
204,968
|
(614,665
|
)
|
113,089
|
(424,138
|
)
|
|||||||
Increase
(decrease) in unrealized
|
|||||||||||||
gain
on marketable securities
|
|||||||||||||
-
net of taxes
|
(3,024,527
|
)
|
(3,143,296
|
)
|
(5,532,198
|
)
|
32,446
|
||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
$
|
9,941,196
|
$
|
7,224,079
|
$
|
3,344,347
|
$
|
6,276,983
|
13.
|
ASSETS
HELD FOR SALE
|
On
July
15, 2004, the Company entered into an agreement for the sale of a certain
parcel
of land located in Jersey City, New Jersey. The sales agreement is subject
to a
due diligence period by the buyer. The sales agreement expired during January
2006. The buyer and seller are continuing to negotiate about certain
environmental matters among themselves and with the State of New Jersey.
The
seller and buyer are aware that a portion of the property may be subject
to
tidelands claims by the State of New Jersey. The Company believes that the
property will be sold during 2006. Additionally, the Company is obligated
for
environmental remediation costs of up to $350,000. As of June 30, 2006, the
Company had also paid $203,000 of legal, site testing and State of New Jersey
Environmental Protection Agency fees. As these costs are incurred, the Company
capitalizes them on the Company's consolidated balance sheet as assets held
for
sale. The Company has classified the asset as held for sale with a net book
value of approximately $848,000 on the Company's consolidated balance sheet
at
June 30, 2006. Management anticipates the property will be sold by December
31,
2006.
-29-
14.
|
NEW
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
|
In
July
2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation
No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" ("FIN 48"). The
interpretation requires a two step approach for recognizing and measuring
tax
benefits based on a recognition threshold of “more likely than not”. FIN 48 also
requires explicit disclosures about uncertainties in tax positions including
a
detailed rollforward of tax benefits that do not qualify for financial
statement
recognition. The adoption of FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2006. The
implementation of FIN 48 could have a material effect on the consolidated
balance sheet and results of operations but the effect of such implementation
is
not determinable at this time.
In
December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), "Share-Based Payment",
that
requires compensation costs related to share-based payment transactions
to be
recognized in the financial statements. With limited exceptions, the amount
of
compensation cost is measured based on the grant-date fair value of the
equity
or liability instruments issued. In addition, liability awards are to be
remeasured each reporting period. Compensation cost will be recognized
over the
period that an employee provides service in exchange for the reward. SFAS
No.
123(R) is effective as to the Company as of the beginning of the Company's
2006
fiscal year. The Company accounted for stock-based compensation costs using
the
modified prospective method at the time of adoption. The adoption of SFAS
123(R)
resulted in incremental stock-based compensation expense of $226,000 during
the
six months ended June 30, 2006. The adoption of SFAS 123(R) did not have
a
material effect on the consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2006 or
the
consolidated statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30,
2006.
In
December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, "Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets",
an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29. SFAS No. 153 amends APB Opinion No. 29
by
eliminating the exception under APB No. 29 for nonmonetary exchanges of similar
productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges
of
nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange
has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected
to
change significantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS No. 153 is effective
for
periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 153 did not
have
a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or results
of
operations.
In
November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs”, an amendment to
Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43 chapter 4. SFAS No. 151 requires that
abnormal costs of idle facility expenses, freight, handling costs and wasted
material (spoilage) be recognized as current-period charges. SFAS No. 151
is
effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Adoption of SFAS
No.
151 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial
position or results of operations.
-30-
15. Legal
Proceedings
The
Company and two of its officers are defendants in a wrongful termination
lawsuit
brought in the District Court of Frankfurt am Main, Germany by a former
employee
at a foreign subsidiary of the Company. The Company believes it has adequately
accrued sufficient amounts for this liability in accordance with the terms
of
the ex-employee's employment agreement.
The
Company is a plaintiff in a lawsuit captioned Bel Fuse Inc., a New Jersey
corporation, and Bel Power, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation, v. Andrew
Ferencz, Gregory Zovonar, Bernhard Schroter, EE2GO, Inc., a Massachusetts
corporation, Howard E. Kaepplein and William Ng, Defendants brought in the
Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The Company was granted
injunctive relief and is seeking damages against the former stockholders
of
Galaxy Power, Inc., key employees of Galaxy and a corporation formed by some
or
all of the individual defendants. The Company has alleged that the defendants
violated their written non-competition, non-disclosure and non-solicitation
agreements, diverted business and usurped substantial business opportunities
with key customers, misappropriated confidential information and trade secrets,
and harmed the Company’s business.
In
a
related matter, the Company is a defendant in a lawsuit captioned Robert
Chimielnski, P.C. on behalf of the stockholder representatives and the former
stockholders of Galaxy Power, Inc. v. Bel Fuse Inc. et al brought in the
Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This complaint for damages
and injunctive relief is based on an alleged breach of contract and other
allegedly illegal acts in a corporate context arising out of the defendants'
objection to the release of nearly $2.0 million held in escrow under the
terms
of the stock purchase agreement between Galaxy and the Company.
The
Company is a defendant in a lawsuit captioned Murata Manufacturing Company,
Ltd.
v. Bel Fuse Inc et al and brought in Illinois Federal District Court. Plaintiff
claims that its patent covers all of the Company's modular jack products.
That
party had previously advised the Company that it was willing to grant a
non-exclusive license to the Company under the patent for a 3% royalty on
all
future gross sales of ICM products; payment of a lump sum of 3% of past sales
including sales of applicable Insilco products; an annual minimum royalty
of
$500,000; payment of all attorney fees; and marking of all licensed ICM's
with
the third party's patent number. The Company is also a defendant in a lawsuit,
captioned Regal Electronics, Inc. v. Bel Fuse Inc. and brought in California
Federal District Court. Plaintiff claims that its patent covers certain of
the
Company's modular jack products. That party had previously advised the Company
that it was willing to grant a non transferable license to the Company for
an up
front fee of $500,000 plus a 6% royalty on future sales. The District Court
has
granted summary judgment in the Company's favor dismissing Regal Electronics'
infringement claims, while at the same time the Court dismissed the Company's
invalidity counterclaim against Regal Electronics. As of the date hereof,
the
Company has not been advised as to whether Regal will appeal the Court's
rejection of its infringement claims. The Company believes that none of its
products are covered by these patents and intends to vigorously defend its
position and no accrual has been provided in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements.
-31-
The
Company cannot predict the outcome of these matters; or the impact on
the Company's consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
The
Company is not a party to any other legal proceeding, the adverse outcome
of
which is expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company's
consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
-32-
Item
2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
The
Company’s quarterly and annual operating results are affected by a wide variety
of factors that could materially and adversely affect revenues and
profitability, including the risk factors described in the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. As a result of
these
and other factors, the Company may experience material fluctuations in future
operating results on a quarterly or annual basis, which could materially
and
adversely affect its business, financial condition, operating results, and
stock
prices. Furthermore, this document and other documents filed by the Company
with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) contain certain
forward-looking statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of
1995 (“Forward-Looking Statements”) with respect to the business of the Company.
These Forward-Looking Statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties,
including those detailed in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005, which could cause actual results to
differ
materially from these Forward-Looking Statements. The Company undertakes
no
obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these
Forward-Looking Statements which may be necessary to reflect events or
circumstances after the date such statements are made or to reflect the
occurrence of unanticipated events. An investment in the Company involves
various risks, including those which are detailed from time to time in the
Company’s SEC filings.
Overview
Bel
is a
leading producer of electronic products that help make global connectivity
a
reality. The Company designs, manufactures and markets a broad array of
magnetics, modules, circuit protection devices and interconnect products.
While
these products are deployed primarily in the computer, networking and
telecommunication industries, Bel’s expanding portfolio of products also finds
application in the automotive, medical and consumer electronics markets.
Bel's
products are designed to protect, regulate, connect, isolate or manage a
variety
of electronic circuits.
We
design
our products to enhance the systems in which they operate. As our products
typically become components in other third-party’s systems, our revenues are
largely driven by the extent to which our customers can design and develop
new
applications and the extent to which those customers have needs for the types
of
components that we can provide. We are problem-solvers; we design most of
our
products to combine various discrete components in a manner that will allow
the
systems designer to save space and to offer a more efficient
product.
Our
expenses are driven principally by the cost of the materials that we use
and the
cost of labor where our factories are located. In recent years, the increasing
cost of copper, steel and petroleum-based products, increased transportation
costs and the increased wage structure in the Far East have contributed to
increases in manufacturing costs.
-33-
During
the six months ended June 30, 2006, approximately $4.6 million of the Company’s
sales increase was attributable to the acquisition by the Company of Galaxy
Power, Inc. (“Galaxy”), which occurred on March 22, 2005, and Netwatch s.r.o.
(now named Bel Stewart Net s.r.o.), which occurred on June 30, 2005. Galaxy
was
renamed Bel Power Inc. (“Power”). Excluding the 2005 acquisitions, the Company
had an organic sales increase of 13.1% for the six months ended June 30,
2006.
With these acquisitions, the Company's sales increased by 17.6%. The disclosure
of the Company's revenues excluding the 2005 acquisitions may constitute
a
"Non-GAAP Financial Measure". The Company has provided a reconciliation
by also
including a reference to total revenues. The Company believes that the
reference
to revenues excluding the 2005 acquisitions improves the comparability
of its
disclosures. The 2005 acquisitions resulted in additional Cost of Sales
and
Selling, General and Administrative expenses in the six months ended June
30,
2006 of $3.6 million and $1.1 million, respectively.
Gross
profit margins were lower during the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared
to
June 30, 2005, principally due to increased raw material costs resulting
from
higher commodity prices for copper, steel, and petroleum-based products
and
changes in the Company’s product mix. Sales of the Company’s DC-DC power
products have increased. While these products are strategic to Bel’s growth and
important to total earnings, they return lower gross profit percentage
margins
as a larger percentage of their bills of material are purchased components.
As
these sales continue to increase, the Company’s average gross profit percentage
will likely decrease unless offset by increased sales of higher margin
products.
The increasing sales of the Company's DC-DC power products also have an
impact
on the accelerated write off of intangible assets related to the acquisition
of
Current Concepts. The contingent purchase price payments are accounted
for as
additional purchase price and as an increase to covenants not to compete
within
intangible assets when such payment obligations are incurred. Due to the
shorter
remaining lives of the covenants not to compete, any additional contingent
purchase price payments that are allocated to covenants not to compete
are
amortized over a shorter remaining life, or will be expensed as incurred
if the
applicable covenant to compete has expired. During the quarter ended June
30,
2006, Current Concepts reached their benchmark sales target and no additional
contingent purchase price payments will be made. Gross profit margins are
also
adversely affected to the extent that the Company manufactures lead-free
products, as the Company has additional labor and manufacturing costs but
cannot
attain premium pricing for such products.
The
Company also incurred $0.8 million in pre-tax stock compensation expense
during
the six months ended June 30, 2006 in connection with its Restricted Stock
Award
and Incentive Stock Option Plan. This expense is reflected both in the Company’s
cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expenses which is
principally consistent with the classification of employee compensation expense.
During the six months ended June 30, 2005, the Company did not incur an expense
for stock compensation.
During
the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company incurred a $1.1 million pre-tax
casualty loss primarily for uninsured raw materials destroyed by a fire at
a
Company leased manufacturing facility in the Dominican Republic.
-34-
During
the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company realized a gain on marketable
securities of $5.2 million, net of investment banking fees, offset by a $1.0
million accrual (classified as a selling, general and administrative charge
for
accounting purposes) for performance bonuses awarded by the Board of Directors
in connection with the gain.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
Company’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of
operations are based upon the Company’s consolidated financial statements, which
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements
requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure
of
contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates
its estimates, including those related to product returns, bad debts,
inventories, intangible assets, investments, income taxes and contingencies
and
litigation. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and
on
various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about
the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent
from
other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions.
The
Company believes the following critical accounting policies affect its more
significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated
financial statements.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
The
Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses from
the
inability of its customers to make required payments. The Company determines
its
reserves by both specific identification of customer accounts where appropriate
and the application of historical loss experience to non-specific accounts.
If
the financial condition of the Company's customers were to deteriorate,
resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional
allowances may be required.
-35-
Inventory
The
Company makes purchasing decisions principally based upon firm sales orders
from
customers, the availability and pricing of raw materials and projected customer
requirements. Future events that could adversely affect these decisions and
result in significant charges to the Company’s operations include miscalculating
customer requirements, technology changes which render certain raw materials
and
finished goods obsolete, loss of customers and/or cancellation of sales orders,
stock rotation with distributors and unanticipated termination of distribution
agreements. The Company writes down its inventory for estimated obsolescence
or
unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory
and
the estimated market value based upon the aforementioned assumptions. If
actual
market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management,
additional inventory write-downs may be required.
When
inventory is written-off, it is never written back up; the cost remains at
zero
or the level to which it has been written-down. When inventory that has been
written-off is subsequently used in the manufacturing process, the lower
adjusted cost of the material is charged to cost of sales. Should any of
this
inventory be used in the manufacturing process for customer orders, the improved
gross profit will be recognized at the time the completed product is shipped
and
the sale is recorded.
Acquisitions
Acquisitions
continue to be a key element in the Company's growth strategy. If the Company's
evaluation of an acquisition candidate misjudges its technology, estimated
future sales and profitability levels, ability to keep pace with the latest
technology, or working capital needs these factors could impair the value
of the
investment, which could materially adversely affect the Company's profitability.
Income
Taxes
The
Company files income tax returns in every jurisdiction in which it has reason
to
believe it is subject to tax. Historically, the Company has been subject
to
examination by various taxing jurisdictions. To date, none of these examinations
has resulted in any material additional tax. Nonetheless, any tax jurisdiction
may contend that a filing position claimed by the Company regarding one or
more
of its transactions is contrary to that jurisdiction's laws or
regulations.
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the guidance contained in SEC
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition in Financial
Statements”. Revenue is recognized when the product has been delivered and title
and risk of loss have passed to the customer, collection of the resulting
receivable is deemed probable by management, persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists and the sale price is fixed and determinable.
Historically
the Company has been successful in mitigating the risks associated with its
revenue recognition. Some issues relate to product warranty, credit worthiness
of its customers and concentration of sales among a few major
customers.
-36-
The
Company is not contractually obligated to accept returns from non-distributor
customers except for defective product or in instances where the product does
not meet the Company’s quality specifications. If these conditions existed, the
Company would be obligated to repair or replace the defective product or make
a
cash settlement with the customer. Distributors generally have the right to
return up to 5% of their purchases over the previous three to six months and
are
obligated to purchase an amount at least equal to the return. If the financial
conditions of the Company’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an
impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances for bad
debt
may be required which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s
consolidated results of operations and financial condition. The Company has
a
significant amount of sales with several major customers. The loss of any one
of
these customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s
consolidated results of operations and financial position.
Results
of Operations
The
following table sets forth, for the periods presented, the percentage
relationship to net sales of certain items included in the Company’s
consolidated statements of operations.
Percentage
of Net Sales
Six
Months Ended
June
30,
|
Percentage
of Net Sales
Three
Months Ended
June
30,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
Net
sales
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
|||||
Cost
of sales
|
74.5
|
71.3
|
75.6
|
70.7
|
|||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
16.2
|
15.4
|
15.4
|
15.0
|
|||||||||
Casualty
loss
|
0.9
|
-
|
0.2
|
-
|
|||||||||
Interest
income and interest and financing expense
|
0.9
|
0.4
|
1.0
|
0.5
|
|||||||||
Gain
on sale of marketable securities - net
|
4.3
|
-
|
7.9
|
-
|
|||||||||
Earnings
before provision for income taxes
|
13.6
|
13.7
|
17.6
|
14.8
|
|||||||||
Income
tax provision
|
3.0
|
3.1
|
4.5
|
3.2
|
|||||||||
Net
earnings
|
10.5
|
10.6
|
13.2
|
11.6
|
-37-
The
following table sets forth the year over year percentage increase of certain
items included in the Company's consolidated statements of
operations.
Increase
from
Prior
Period
|
Increase
from
Prior
Period
|
||||||
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2006
compared
with Six Months Ended June
30, 2005
|
Three
Months Ended
June 30, 2006 compared
with Three Months Ended June
30,
2006
|
||||||
Net
sales
|
17.6 | % | 15.5 | % | |||
Cost
of sales
|
23.0 | 23.6 | |||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
23.8 | 18.7 | |||||
Net
earnings
|
16.2
|
31.4 |
SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 VERSUS SIX
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005
Sales
Net
sales
increased 17.6% from $103.0 million during the six months ended June 30, 2005
to
$121.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2006. The Company attributes
the increase to increased module sales of $6.6 million, of which $3.4 million
is
attributable to the acquisition of Galaxy, strong demand for interconnect
products resulting in an increase of $5.1 million in such sales, of which $1.2
million is attributable to the acquisition of Netwatch, and strong demand for
magnetic sales resulting in an increase of $6.4 million in such sales,
offsetting a decrease in circuit protection sales of $0.1 million. Bel had
an
organic sales increase of 13.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2006.
The
significant components of the Company's revenues for the six months ended June
30, 2006 were magnetic products of $68.8 million (as compared with $62.4 million
during the six months ended June 30, 2005), interconnect products of $23.4
million (as compared with $18.3 million during the six months ended June 30,
2005), module products of $19.4 million (as compared with $12.7 million during
the six months ended June 30, 2005), and circuit protection products of $9.5
million (as compared with $9.6 million during the six months ended June 30,
2005).
-38-
Based
in
part on conflicting opinions the Company received from customers and competitors
in the electronics industry pertaining to revenue growth during 2005, the
Company cannot predict with any degree of certainty sales revenue for 2006.
During the second quarter of 2006, several customers have requested deliveries
in excess of their forecasts. The Company has also received several last minute
order changes. Although the Company's backlog has been stable, the Company
feels
that this is not a good indicator of revenues. The Company continues to have
limited visibility as to future customer requirements. The Company had no
customer with sales in excess of 10% of net sales during the six months ended
June 30, 2006.
The
Company cannot quantify the extent of sales growth arising from unit sales
mix
and/or price changes. Given the change in the nature of the products purchased
by customers from period to period, the Company believes that neither unit
changes nor price changes are meaningful. Over the past year, newer and more
sophisticated products with higher unit selling prices have been introduced.
Through the Company's engineering and research effort, the Company has been
successful in adding additional value to existing product lines, which tends
to
increase sales prices initially until that generation of products becomes mature
and sales prices experience price degradation. In general, as products become
mature, average selling prices decrease.
Cost
of Sales
Bel
generally enters into processing arrangements with three independent third
party
contractors in the Far East. The Company uses the services of three additional
sub-contractors without formal agreements. Costs are recorded as incurred for
all products manufactured either at third party facilities or at the Company's
own manufacturing facilities. Such amounts are determined based upon the
estimated stage of production and include labor cost and fringes and related
allocations of factory overhead. The Company manufactures finished goods at
its
own manufacturing facilities in Glen Rock, Pennsylvania, Inwood, New York,
the
Dominican Republic, Mexico, the Czech Republic and Macao.
Cost
of
sales as a percentage of net sales increased from 71.3 % during the six months
ended June 30, 2005 to 74.5% during the six months ended June 30, 2006. The
increase in the cost of sales percentage is primarily attributable to the
following:
¨ |
The
Company incurred a 4.2% increase in material costs as a percentage
of net
sales. The increase in raw material costs is principally related
to
increased manufacturing of value-added products (including new
Power
products in the second half of 2005), which have a higher raw material
content than the Company’s other products, and increased costs for raw
materials such as copper, steel and petroleum-based products and
increased
transportation costs.
|
¨ |
The
Company has also started to pay higher wage rates and benefits to
its
production workers in China. These higher rates and benefits are
reflected
in the Company’s cost of goods sold.
|
-39-
¨ |
Sales
of the Company’s DC-DC power products have increased. While these products
are strategic to Bel’s growth and important to total earnings, they return
lower gross profit percentage margins as a larger percentage of their
bills of materials are purchased components. As these sales continue
to
increase, the Company’s average gross profit percentage will likely
decrease. The increasing sales also have an impact on the accelerated
write off of intangibles related to contingent purchase price payments
arising from the acquisition of Current
Concepts.
|
Included
in cost of sales are research and development expenses of $3.5 million and
$3.8
million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The
principal reason for the decrease is less research and development expense
in
the United States offset in part by higher expenditures in the Far
East.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
The
percentage relationship of selling, general and administrative expenses to
net
sales increased from 15.4 % during the six months ended June 30, 2005 to 16.2%
during the six months ended June 30, 2006. The Company attributes $1.3 million
of the $3.8 million increase in the dollar amount of such expenses to increased
selling expenses, including $.2 million in Power related expenses. The $2.5
million increase in general and administrative expenses includes $1.0 million
related to Power and Bel Net additional salaries, wages and bonuses of $1.7
million, principally attributable to a $1.0 million bonus approved by the Board
of Directors in connection with the gain from the sale of Artesyn stock, raises
and other bonus accruals, additional stock compensation expense of $.5 million
partially arising from the Company’s implementation of Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards ("SFAS") 123 (R) during 2006 (see below and Notes 1 and
10
of the Notes to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements) and additional
professional fees of $.3 million principally related to Sarbanes-Oxley
compliance, offset in part by lower bad debt expense of $.4 million and other
decreases in several expense categories totaling $.4 million.
During
the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company expensed share based
compensation costs in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-based Payment".
This expense is included in both cost of sales and selling, general and
administrative expenses in the amount of approximately $270,000 and $520,000,
respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2006.
-40-
Casualty
Loss
The
Company incurred an estimated loss of $1.1 million as a result of a fire at
its
leased manufacturing facility in the Dominican Republic for raw materials and
equipment in excess of estimated insurance proceeds. The production at this
facility has been substantially restored during July 2006.
Interest
Income
Interest
income represents interest earned on cash and cash equivalents which increased
by approximately $541,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2006, as compared
to the comparable period in 2005. The increase is due primarily to increased
balances of cash and cash equivalent balances and marketable securities and
higher yields on such balances.
Interest
Expense
A
$10
million term loan was entered into on March 21, 2003, which was borrowed for
the
acquisition of Insilco's Passive Components Group. The loan bore interest at
LIBOR plus 1.50% payable quarterly and was completely paid off by June 30,
2005.
Interest expense related to these borrowings amounted to $207,000 during the
six
months ended June 30, 2005. During the six months ended June 30, 2006, interest
expense included $44,000 of financing expenses related to the Company's credit
facility in the United States.
Provision
for Income Taxes
The
provision for income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $3.7
million compared to $3.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2005.
The
Company's earnings before income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2006
are approximately $2.2 million higher than in 2005. During the six months ended
June 30, 2006, the Company incurred higher taxes of approximately $.5 million
principally as a result of higher United States taxes resulting from the gain
from the sale of marketable securities (Artesyn) and higher United States
taxable income from operations offset in part by lower foreign taxes in the
Far
East due to the implementation by the Company of its Macao Commercial Offshore
Company ("MCO") which is not subject to Macao corporation income taxes. This
had
an impact of reducing the effective tax rate from 22.6% for the six months
ended
June 30, 2005 to 22.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2006 (measured as
the
provision as a percentage of earnings before provision for income
taxes).
-41-
The
Company conducts manufacturing activities in the Far East. More specifically,
the Company has the majority of its products manufactured in the People’s
Republic of China (“PRC”), Hong Kong and Macao and has not been subject to
corporate income tax in the PRC. The Company's activities in Hong Kong have
generally consisted of administration, quality control and accounting, as well
as some limited manufacturing activities. Hong Kong imposes corporate income
tax
at a rate of 17.5 percent solely on income sourced to Hong Kong. That is, its
tax system is a territorial one which only seeks to tax activities conducted
in
Hong Kong. Since the Bel entity in Hong Kong conducts most of its manufacturing
and quality control activities in the PRC, a portion of this entity’s income was
deemed “offshore” and thus not fully taxable in Hong Kong.
The
Company also conducts manufacturing operations in Macao. Macao has a statutory
corporate income tax rate of 16 percent.
Since
most of the Company's operations are conducted in the Far East, the majority
of
its profits are sourced in these three Far East jurisdictions (i.e. PRC, Hong
Kong and Macao). Accordingly, the profits earned in the U.S. are comparatively
small in relation to its profits earned in the Far East. Therefore, there is
generally a significant difference between the statutory U.S. tax rate and
the
Company's effective tax rate.
During
2005, the Company was granted an offshore operating license from the government
of Macao to set up a Commercial Offshore Company ("MCO") named Bel Fuse (Macao
Commercial Offshore) Limited with the intent to handle all of the Company’s
sales to third party customers in Asia. Sales to third party customers commenced
during the first quarter of 2006. Sales consist of products manufactured in
the
PRC. The MCO is not subject to Macao corporation income taxes. It is not
possible at this time to determine the tax impact on the Company of the
establishment of this new entity.
The
Company has historically followed a practice of reinvesting a portion of the
earnings of foreign subsidiaries in the expansion of its foreign operations.
If
the unrepatriated earnings were distributed to the parent corporation rather
than reinvested in the Far East, such funds would be subject to United States
Federal income taxes. During 2005, $70.6 million of earnings were repatriated
by
the Company.
-42-
Inflation
and Foreign Currency Exchange
During
the past two years, the effect of inflation on the Company's profitability
was
not material. Historically, fluctuations of the U.S. Dollar against other major
currencies have not significantly affected the Company's foreign operations
as
most sales have been denominated in U.S. Dollars or currencies directly or
indirectly linked to the U.S. Dollar. Most significant expenses, including
raw
materials, labor and manufacturing expenses, are either incurred in U.S. Dollars
or the currencies of the Hong Kong Dollar, the Macao Pataca or the Chinese
Renminbi. Commencing with the acquisition of the Passive Components Group,
the
Company's European entity has sales transactions which are denominated
principally in Euros and British Pounds. Conversion of these transactions into
U.S. dollars has resulted in currency exchange gains of $(203,000) and
$(105,000) for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, which
were charged to expense, and approximately $(205,000) and $(615,000) for the
six
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, in unrealized exchange gains
(losses) relating to the translation of foreign subsidiary financial statements
which are included in accumulated other comprehensive income. Any change in
linkage of the U.S. Dollar and the Hong Kong Dollar, the Chinese Renminbi or
the
Macao Pataca could have a material effect on the Company's consolidated
financial position or results of operations. The Company’s investment in Toko is
denominated in Japanese yen. A significant change in the value of the yen versus
the U.S. dollar could have a material effect on the investment value of Toko.
THREE
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 VERSUS THREE
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005
Sales
Net
sales
increased 15.5% from $57.5 million during the three months ended June 30, 2005
to $66.5 million during the three months ended June 30, 2006. The Company
attributes the increase to increased module sales of $2.8 million, strong demand
for interconnect products resulting in an increase of $2.4 million in such
sales, of which $0.7 million is attributable to the acquisition of Netwatch,
strong demand for magnetic sales resulting in an increase of $3.5 million in
such sales, and an increase in circuit protection sales of $0.3 million. Bel
had
an organic sales increase of 14.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2006.
The
significant components of the Company's revenues for the three months ended
June
30, 2006 were magnetic products of $36.9 million (as compared with $33.4 million
during the three months ended June 30, 2005), interconnect products of $12.3
million (as compared with $9.9 million during the three months ended June 30,
2005), module products of $12.0 million (as compared with $9.2 million during
the three months ended June 30, 2005), and circuit protection products of $5.3
million (as compared with $5.0 million during the three months ended June 30,
2005.)
-43-
Cost
of Sales
Bel
generally enters into processing arrangements with three independent third
party
contractors in the Far East. The Company uses the services of three additional
subcontractors without formal agreements. Costs are recorded as incurred for
all
products manufactured either at third party facilities or at the Company's
own
manufacturing facilities. Such amounts are determined based upon the estimated
stage of production and include labor cost and fringes and related allocations
of factory overhead. The Company manufactures finished goods at its own
manufacturing facilities in Glen Rock, Pennsylvania, Inwood, New York, the
Dominican Republic and Mexico, the Czech Republic and Macao.
Cost
of
sales as a percentage of net sales increased from 70.7% during the three months
ended June 30, 2005 to 75.6% during the three months ended June 30, 2006. The
increase in the cost of sales percentage is primarily attributable to the
following:
¨ |
The
Company incurred a 5.8% increase in material costs as a percentage
of net
sales. The increase in raw material costs is principally related
to
increased manufacturing of value-added products (including new
Power
products in the second half of 2005), which have a higher raw material
content than the Company’s other products, and increased costs for raw
materials such as copper, steel and petroleum-based products and
increased
transportation costs.
|
¨ |
The
Company has also started to pay higher wage rates and benefits to
its
production workers in China. These higher rates and benefits are
reflected
in the Company’s cost of goods sold.
|
¨ |
The
Company incurred a pre-tax amortization charge of $289,000 related
to
intangibles acquired in the Power and Insilco
acquisitions.
|
¨ |
The
Company incurred $270,000 of compensation expense pursuant to SFAS
No.
123R that was charged to cost of
sales.
|
¨ |
The
Company has been required to run duplicate ROHS and non-ROHS production
lines to support its customers as they convert to “lead free”
products.
|
-44-
¨ |
Sales
of the Company’s DC-DC power products have increased. While these products
are strategic to Bel’s growth and important to total earnings, they return
lower gross profit percentage margins as a larger percentage of their
bills of materials are purchased components. As these sales continue
to
increase, the Company’s average gross profit percentage will likely
decrease. The increasing sales also have an impact on the accelerated
write off of intangibles related to contingent purchase price payments
arising from the acquisition of Current
Concepts.
|
Included
in cost of sales are research and development expenses of $1.6 million and
$1.9
million for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
The
percentage relationship of selling, general and administrative expenses to
net
sales increased from 15.0% during the three months ended June 30, 2005 to 15.4%
during the three months ended June 30, 2006. The Company attributes $.5 million
of the $1.6 million increase in the dollar amount of such expenses to increased
selling expenses. The $1.1 million increase in general and administrative
expenses is principally attributable to the $1.0 million bonus approved by
the
Board of Directors in connection with the gain from the sale of Artesyn Stock.
During
the three months ended June 30, 2006, the Company expensed share based
compensation costs in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-based Payment".
This expense is included in both cost of sales and selling, general and
administrative expenses in the amount of approximately $270,000 and $120,000,
respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2006.
-45-
Casualty
Loss
The
Company incurred an estimated loss of $.1 million as a result of a fire at
its
leased manufacturing facility in the Dominican Republic for raw materials and
equipment in excess of estimated insurance proceeds. The production at this
facility has been substantially restored during July 2006.
Interest
Income
Interest
income represents interest earned on cash and cash equivalents which increased
by approximately $254,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2006, as
compared to the comparable period in 2005. The increase is due primarily to
increased balances of cash and cash equivalent balances and marketable
securities and increased yields on such balances.
Interest
Expense
A
$10
million term loan was entered into on March 21, 2003, which was borrowed for
the
acquisition of Insilco's Passive Components Group. The loan bore interest at
LIBOR plus 1.50% payable quarterly and was completely paid off by June 30,
2005.
Interest expense related to these borrowings amounted to $140,000 during the
three months ended June 30, 2005. During the three months ended June 30, 2006,
interest and other expenses included $17,000 of financing expenses related
to
the Company's credit facility in the United States.
Provision
for Income Taxes
The
provision for income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was $3.0
million compared to $1.8 million during the three months ended June 30, 2005.
The Company's earnings before income taxes for the three months ended June
30,
2006 are approximately $3.2 million higher than in 2005. The reasons for the
increase in taxes and pre-tax income are principally attributable to the same
reasons as set forth in the six month analysis.
-46-
Inflation
and Foreign Currency Exchange
During
the past two years, the effect of inflation on the Company's profitability
was
not material. Historically, fluctuations of the U.S. Dollar against other major
currencies have not significantly affected the Company's foreign operations
as
most sales have been denominated in U.S. Dollars or currencies directly or
indirectly linked to the U.S. Dollar. Most significant expenses, including
raw
materials, labor and manufacturing expenses, are either incurred in U.S. Dollars
or the currencies of the Hong Kong Dollar, the Macao Pataca or the Chinese
Renminbi. Commencing with the acquisition of the Passive Components Group,
the
Company's European entity has sales transactions which are denominated
principally in Euros and British Pounds. Conversion of these transactions into
U.S. dollars has resulted in currency exchange losses of $245,000 and $22,000
for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, which were
charged to expense, and approximately $113,000 and $425,000 for the three months
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively, in unrealized exchange gains
(losses) relating to the translation of foreign subsidiary financial statements
which are included in accumulated other comprehensive income. Any change in
linkage of the U.S. Dollar and the Hong Kong Dollar, the Chinese Renminbi or
the
Macao Pataca could have a material effect on the Company's consolidated
financial position or results of operations.
-47-
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Historically,
the Company has financed its capital expenditures primarily through cash flows
from operating activities, as supplemented by bank borrowings. Management
believes that the cash flow from operations after payments of dividends combined
with its existing capital base and the Company's available lines of credit,
will
be sufficient to fund its operations for at least the next 12 months. Such
statement constitutes a Forward Looking Statement. Factors which could cause
the
Company to require additional capital include, among other things, a softening
in the demand for the Company’s existing products, an inability to respond to
customer demand for new products, potential acquisitions requiring substantial
capital, future expansion of the Company's operations and net losses that would
result in net cash being used in operating, investing and/or financing
activities which result in net decreases in cash and cash equivalents. Net
losses may result in the loss of domestic and foreign credit facilities and
preclude the Company from raising debt or equity financing in the capital
markets.
Previously,
the Company had one domestic line of credit of $10 million. During March 2005,
the Company borrowed $8 million against this line of credit to partially finance
the acquisition of Galaxy. The outstanding balance was paid off in its entirety
on June 20, 2005. During July 2005, the Company amended its credit agreement
to
increase the line of credit to $20 million, which expires on July 31, 2008.
During October 2005, the Company borrowed $4.0 million against the line of
credit which was paid off during December 2005. As of June 30, 2006 there was
no
loan balance on the line of credit. The loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 0.75%
to 1.25% based on certain financial statement ratios maintained by the Company.
As of December 31, 2005 and June 30, 2006, the entire $20 million line of credit
was available to the Company to borrow. The loan is collateralized with a first
priority security interest in and lien on 65% of all the issued and outstanding
shares of the capital stock of certain of the foreign subsidiaries of the
Company and all other personal property and certain real property of the
Company.
The
Company's Hong Kong subsidiary has an unsecured line of credit of approximately
$2 million, which was unused at June 30, 2006. This line of credit expires
during July 2007. Borrowing on this line of credit is guaranteed by the Company.
For
information regarding further commitments under the Company's operating leases,
see Note 15 of Notes to Company's Consolidated Financial Statements in the
Company's 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
-48-
The
Company has cumulatively acquired a total of 4,926,000 shares, or 5%, of the
common stock of Toko, Inc. (“Toko”) at a total purchase price of $15.6 million.
Of these amounts, the Company acquired 101,000 shares at a cost of $329,000
subsequent to June 30, 2006. Toko had a market capitalization of approximately
$327 million as of August 1, 2006. These purchases are reflected on the
Company’s consolidated balance sheet as marketable securities . These marketable
securities are considered to be available for sale under SFAS No. 115,
“Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities”. Thus, as of
June 30, 2006, the Company has recorded an unrealized gain, net of income taxes,
of approximately $.5 million which is included in accumulated other
comprehensive income as stated in the consolidated statement of stockholders’
equity. In connection with this transaction, the Company is obligated to pay
an
investment banker’s advisory fee to a third party of 20% of the appreciation in
the stock of Toko, or $1 million, whichever is lower. As of June 30, 2006,
the
Company has accrued a fee in the amount of approximately $150,000. Such amount
has been deferred within other assets. If the proposed acquisition of the Toko
is consummated, the fee will be capitalized as part of the acquisition costs.
Such amount will be expensed at such time as the Company deems the consummation
of the proposed acquisition to be unsuccessful.
The
Company acquired a total of 2,037,500 shares of the common stock of Artesyn
Technologies, Inc. (“Artesyn”) at a total purchase price of $16,331,469. On
April 28, 2006, Artesyn was acquired by Emerson Network Power for $11.00
per
share in cash. During the second quarter of 2006, in connection with the
Company's sale of Artesyn stock, the Company recognized a gain of approximately
$5.2 million, net of investment banker’s advisory fees of $850,000. The Company
accrued bonuses of $1.0 million in connection with the gain. For financial
statement presentation purposes, the $1.0 million bonus was classified as
a
selling, general and administrative expense to be paid to key employees by
December 31, 2006.
The
Company is constructing a 117,000 square foot manufacturing facility in
Zhongshan City, PRC for approximately $2.3 million. As of June 30 2006, the
Company has paid approximately $2.1 million toward the construction. The Company
expects to complete the construction during 2006.
-49-
On
July
15, 2004, the Company entered into an agreement for the sale of a certain parcel
of land located in Jersey City, New Jersey. The sales agreement is subject
to a
due diligence period by the buyer. The sales agreement expired during January
2006. The buyer and seller are continuing to negotiate about certain
environmental matters among themselves and with the State of New Jersey. The
seller and buyer are aware that a portion of the property may be subject to
tidelands claims by the State of New Jersey. The Company believes that the
property will be sold during 2006. Additionally, the Company is obligated for
environmental remediation costs of up to $350,000. As of June 30, 2006, the
Company had also paid $203,000 of legal, site testing and State of New Jersey
Environmental Protection Agency Fees. As these costs are incurred, the Company
capitalizes them on the Company's consolidated balance sheet as assets held
for
sale. The Company has classified the asset as held for sale with a net book
value of approximately $848,000 on the Company's consolidated balance sheet
at
June 30, 2006.
Under
the
terms of the E-Power Ltd (“E-Power”) and Current Concepts, Inc. (“Current
Concepts”) acquisition agreements of May 11, 2001, the Company is required to
make contingent purchase price payments up to an aggregate of $7.6 million
should the acquired companies attain specified sales levels. During February
2006, E-Power was paid $2.0 million in contingent purchase price payments as
E-Power's sales, as defined, reached $15.0 million. An additional $4.0 million
will be paid if such sales reach $25.0 million on a cumulative basis through
May
2007. The contingent purchase price payments for E-Power are accounted for
as
additional purchase price and as an increase to goodwill when such payment
obligations are incurred. Current Concepts will be paid 16% of sales, as
defined, on the first $10.0 million of sales through May 2007. This $10.0
million benchmark was reached during the second quarter of 2006 and therefore
no
additional payments will be made. During the six months ended June 30, 2006
and
2005, the Company paid approximately $447,000 and $296,000, respectively, in
contingent purchase price payments to Current Concepts. The contingent purchase
price payments for Current Concepts are accounted for as additional purchase
price and as an increase to covenants not to compete within intangible assets
when such payment obligations are incurred.
On
May 9,
2000, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 10% of the
Company’s outstanding common shares from time to time in market or privately
negotiated transactions. As of June 30, 2006, the Company had cumulatively
purchased and retired 23,600 Class B shares at a cost of approximately $808,000,
which reduced the number of Class B common shares outstanding. No shares were
repurchased during the six months ended June 30, 2006.
During
the six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company's cash and cash equivalents
increased by $26.4 million reflecting approximately $8.7 million provided by
operating activities (principally as a result of the Company's net income of
$12.8 million), and proceeds of $1.9 million from the exercise of stock options,
offset in part by $2.7 million used principally for acquisitions, $4.3 million
for the purchase of property, plant and equipment, and $1.1 million for payments
of dividends.
-50-
Cash,
marketable securities and cash equivalents and accounts receivable comprised
approximately 53.9% and 53.6% of the Company's total assets at June 30, 2006
and
December 31, 2005, respectively. The Company's current ratio (i.e., the ratio
of
current assets to current liabilities) was 4.0 to 1 and 4.5 to 1 at June 30,
2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.
The
following table sets forth at June 30, 2006 the amounts of payments due under
specific types of contractual obligations, aggregated by category of contractual
obligation, for the time periods described below.
Payments
due by period
|
||||||||||||||||
Contractual
Obligations
|
Total
|
Less
than
one
year
|
1-3
years
|
3-5
years
|
More
than
5
years
|
|||||||||||
Capital
expenditure obligations
|
$
|
2,715,548
|
$
|
2,715,548
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
||||||
Contingent
purchase price commitments
|
2,383,516
|
2,383,516
|
||||||||||||||
Operating
leases
|
3,802,996
|
1,392,957
|
1,546,563
|
863,476
|
||||||||||||
Raw
material purchase obligations
|
19,349,197
|
19,349,197
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
28,251,257
|
$
|
25,841,218
|
$
|
1,546,563
|
$
|
863,476
|
$
|
-
|
The
Company is required to pay its SERP obligations at the occurrence of certain
events. As of June 30, 2006 the SERP had an estimated unfunded benefit
obligation of approximately $3.8 million.
Other
Matters
The
Company believes that it has sufficient cash reserves to fund its foreseeable
working capital needs. It may, however, seek to expand such resources through
bank borrowings, at favorable lending rates, from time to time. Should the
Company pursue additional acquisitions during 2006, the Company may be required
to pursue public or private equity or debt transactions to finance the
acquisitions and to provide working capital to the acquired
companies.
-51-
New
Financial Accounting Standards
In
July
2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation
No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes" ("FIN 48"). The
interpretation requires a two step approach for recognizing and measuring
tax
benefits based on a recognition threshold of “more likely than not”. The FASB
also requires explicit disclosures about uncertainties in tax positions
including a detailed rollforward of tax benefits that do not qualify for
financial statement recognition. The adoption of FIN 48 is effective for
fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2006. The
implementation of FIN 48 could have a material effect on the consolidated
balance sheet and results of operations but the effect of such
implementation is not determinable at this time.
In
December 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), "Share-Based Payment" , that
requires compensation costs related to share-based payment transactions to
be
recognized in the financial statements. With limited exceptions, the amount
of
compensation cost is measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity
or liability instruments issued. In addition, liability awards are to be
remeasured each reporting period. Compensation cost will be recognized over
the
period that an employee provides service in exchange for the reward. SFAS No.
123(R) is effective as to the Company as of the beginning of the Company's
2006
fiscal year. The Company accounted for the stock-based compensation costs using
the modified prospective method at the time of adoption. The adoption of SFAS
123(R) resulted in incremental stock-based compensation expense of $226,000
(pre-tax) during the six months ended June 30, 2006. The adoption of SFAS 123(R)
did not have a material effect on the consolidated balance sheet as of June
30,
2006 or the consolidated statement of cash flows for the six months ended June
30, 2006.
In
December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, "Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets",
an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29. SFAS No. 153 amends APB Opinion No. 29
by
eliminating the exception under APB No. 29 for nonmonetary exchanges of similar
productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of
nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange
has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected
to
change significantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS No. 153 is effective
for
periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS No. 153 did not
have
a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position or results
of
operations.
In
November 2004 the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs”, an amendment to
Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43 chapter 4. SFAS No. 151 requires that
abnormal costs of idle facility expenses, freight, handling costs and wasted
material (spoilage) be recognized as current-period charges. SFAS No. 151 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Adoption of SFAS
No.
151 did not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or
financial position.
-52-
Item
3.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments — The following disclosure of the estimated fair
value of financial instruments is made in accordance with the requirements
SFAS
No. 107. The estimated fair values of financial instruments have been determined
by the Company using available market information and appropriate valuation
methodologies.
However,
considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the
estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not
necessarily indicative of the amounts that the Company could realize in a
current market exchange.
The
Company has not entered into, and does not expect to enter into, financial
instruments for trading or hedging purposes. The Company does not currently
anticipate entering into interest rate swaps and/or similar
instruments.
The
Company's carrying values of cash, marketable securities, accounts receivable,
accounts payable and accrued expenses are a reasonable approximation of their
fair value.
The
Company enters into transactions denominated in U.S. Dollars, Hong Kong Dollars,
the Macao Pataca, the Chinese Renminbi, Euros and British Pounds. Fluctuations
in the U.S. dollar exchange rate against these currencies could significantly
impact the Company's consolidated results of operations.
The
Company believes that a change in interest rates of 1% or 2% would not have
a
material effect on the Company's consolidated statement of operations or balance
sheet.
-53-
Item
4.
Controls
and Procedures
a. |
Disclosure
controls and procedures.
As of the end of the Company’s most recently completed fiscal quarter
covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation,
with the
participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s chief
executive officer and vice president of finance, of the effectiveness
of
the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Securities
Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s chief
executive officer and vice president of finance concluded that
the
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring
that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the
reports
that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified
in
the SEC’s rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Vice
President
of Finance, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding
required
disclosure.
|
b. |
Changes
in internal controls over financial reporting:
There have been no changes in the Company's internal controls over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company's last fiscal
quarter
to which this report relates that have materially affected, or
are
reasonable likely to materially affect, the Company internal control
over
financial reporting.
|
-54-
PART
II.
Other Information
Item
1. Legal
Proceedings
The
Company and two of its officers are defendants in a wrongful termination
lawsuit
brought in District Court of Frankfurt am Main, Germany by a former employee
at
a foreign subsidiary of the Company. The Company believes it has adequately
accrued sufficient amounts for this liability in accordance with the terms
of
the ex-employee's employment agreement.
The
Company is a plaintiff in a lawsuit captioned Bel Fuse Inc., a New Jersey
corporation, and Bel Power, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation, v. Andrew
Ferencz, Gregory Zovonar, Bernhard Schroter, EE2GO, Inc., a Massachusetts
corporation, Howard E. Kaepplein and William Ng, Defendants brought in the
Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The Company was granted
injunctive relief and is seeking damages against the former stockholders of
Galaxy Power, Inc, the Company’s recent acquisition, and key employees of Galaxy
and a corporation formed by some or all of the individual defendants. The
Company has alleged that the defendants violated their written non-competition,
non-disclosure and non-solicitation agreements, diverted business and usurped
substantial business opportunities with key customers, misappropriated
confidential information and trade secrets, and harmed the Company’s business.
In
a
related matter, the Company is a defendant in a lawsuit captioned Robert
Chimielnski, P.C. on behalf of the stockholder representatives and the former
stockholders of Galaxy Power, Inc. v. Bel Fuse Inc. et al brought in the
Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This complaint for damages
and injunctive relief is based on an alleged breach of contract and other
allegedly illegal acts in a corporate context arising out of the defendant's
objection to the release of nearly $2.0 million held in escrow under the
terms
of the stock purchase agreement between Galaxy and the
Company.
The
Company is a defendant in a lawsuit captioned Murata Manufacturing Company,
Ltd.
v. Bel Fuse Inc et al and brought in Illinois Federal District Court. Plaintiff
claims that its patent covers all of the Company's modular jack products. That
party had previously advised the Company that it was willing to grant a
non-exclusive license to the Company under the patent for a 3% royalty on all
future gross sales of ICM products; payment of a lump sum of 3% of past sales
including sales of applicable Insilco products; an annual minimum royalty of
$500,000; payment of all attorney fees; and marking of all licensed ICM's with
the third party's patent number. The Company is also a defendant in a lawsuit,
captioned Regal Electronics, Inc. v. Bel Fuse Inc. and brought in California
Federal District Court. Plaintiff claims that its patent covers certain of
the
Company's modular jack products. That party had previously advised the Company
that it was willing to grant a non transferable license to the Company for
an up
front fee of $500,000 plus a 6% royalty on future sales. The District Court
has
granted summary judgment in the Company's favor dismissing Regal Electronics'
infringement claims, while at the same time the Court dismissed the Company's
invalidity counterclaim against Regal Electronics. As of the date hereof, the
Company has not been advised as to whether Regal will appeal the Court's
rejection of its infringement claims. The Company believes that none of its
products are covered by these patents and intends to vigorously defend its
position and no accrual has been provided in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements.
-55-
The
Company cannot predict the outcome of these matters or the impact on the
Company's consolidated financial condition or results of
operations.
The
Company is not a party to any other legal proceeding, the adverse outcome of
which is expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company's
consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
Item
4. Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The
Company’s annual meeting of security holders was held on May 17, 2006. At the
meeting the Board’s nominees were elected to the Board of Directors for
terms of three years. The votes were cast as follows:
For
|
Withheld
|
||||||
Howard
Bernstein
|
2,428,653
|
16,326
|
|||||
John
Tweedy
|
2,428,653
|
16,326
|
-56-
Item
6.
Exhibits
(a)
Exhibits:
31.1
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
31.2
|
Certification
of the Vice President of Finance pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
-
Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.2
|
Certification
of the Vice-President of Finance pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
-57-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
BEL FUSE INC. | ||
|
|
|
By: | /s/ Daniel Bernstein | |
Daniel Bernstein, President and Chief
Executive Officer
|
||
By: | /s/ Colin Dunn | |
Colin Dunn, Vice President of Finance |
Dated:
August 9, 2006
-58-
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Exhibit
31.1 - Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302
of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit
31.2 - Certification of the Vice President of Finance pursuant to Section 302
of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit
32.1 - Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906
of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit
32.2 - Certification of the Vice President of Finance pursuant to Section 906
of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.