BEL FUSE INC /NJ - Quarter Report: 2008 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x |
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
quarterly period ended September
30, 2008
or
¨ |
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
transition period from to
Commission
File Number: 0-F11676
BEL
FUSE
INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
NEW
JERSEY
|
22-1463699
|
(State
of other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
206
Van Vorst Street
|
Jersey
City, New Jersey
|
07302
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(201)
432-0463
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934
during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. x
Yes
¨
No
Indicate
by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the
definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated
filer x
|
Non-accelerated
filer ¨
|
Smaller
reporting company ¨
|
(Do
not check if a smaller
reporting company) |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ¨
Yes
x
No
At
November 6, 2008, there were 2,183,549 shares of Class A Common Stock,
$0.10 par
value, outstanding and 9,370,643 shares of Class B Common Stock, $0.10
par
value, outstanding.
BEL
FUSE
INC.
INDEX
Page
|
|||
Part
I
|
Financial
Information
|
||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
1
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2008 and December
31,
2007
|
2-3
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine
Months Ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007
|
4
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the Year
Ended
December 31, 2007 and the Nine Months Ended September 30,
2008
|
5
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended
September
30, 2008 and 2007
|
6-7
|
||
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
8-25
|
||
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
26-27
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of
|
||
Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
|
28-43
|
||
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About
|
||
Market
Risk
|
44-45
|
||
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
46
|
|
Part
II
|
Other
Information
|
||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
46
|
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
47
|
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
48
|
|
Signatures
|
49
|
PART
I.
Financial
Information
Item
1. Financial
Statements (Unaudited)
Certain
information and footnote disclosures required under accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed
or
omitted from the following condensed consolidated financial statements
pursuant
to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The
following condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the year-end consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended
December 31, 2007.
The
results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008 and
2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire fiscal
year or
for any other period.
-
1 -
BEL
FUSE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars
in thousands)
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Current
Assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
82,771
|
$
|
83,875
|
|||
Marketable
securities
|
10,778
|
3,273
|
|||||
Short-term
investments
|
5,774
|
20,542
|
|||||
Accounts
receivable - less allowance for doubtful
|
|||||||
accounts
of $754 and $977 at September 30,
|
|||||||
2008
and December 31, 2007, respectively
|
47,240
|
52,217
|
|||||
Inventories
|
49,136
|
39,049
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current
|
|||||||
assets
|
1,597
|
1,446
|
|||||
Refundable
income taxes
|
1,913
|
3,168
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
1,251
|
2,661
|
|||||
Total
Current Assets
|
200,460
|
206,231
|
|||||
Property,
plant and equipment - net
|
41,307
|
41,113
|
|||||
Restricted
cash
|
2,315
|
4,553
|
|||||
Long-term
investments
|
2,459
|
2,536
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
7,506
|
4,364
|
|||||
Intangible
assets - net
|
993
|
1,181
|
|||||
Goodwill
|
28,524
|
28,447
|
|||||
Other
assets
|
4,938
|
5,435
|
|||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$
|
288,502
|
$
|
293,860
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
-
2 -
BEL
FUSE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS - CONTINUED
(dollars
in thousands, except per share data)
September
30,
|
December 31,
|
||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|||||||
Current
Liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
19,230
|
$
|
16,975
|
|||
Accrued
expenses
|
12,918
|
11,283
|
|||||
Income
taxes payable
|
4,642
|
4,007
|
|||||
Dividends
payable
|
830
|
795
|
|||||
Total
Current Liabilities
|
37,620
|
33,060
|
|||||
Long-term
Liabilities:
|
|||||||
Deferred
gain on sale of property
|
4,623
|
4,645
|
|||||
Liability
for uncertain tax positions
|
3,543
|
6,930
|
|||||
Minimum
pension obligation and
|
|||||||
unfunded
pension liability
|
5,182
|
4,698
|
|||||
Total
Long-term Liabilities
|
13,348
|
16,273
|
|||||
Total
Liabilities
|
50,968
|
49,333
|
|||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
|||||||
Stockholders'
Equity:
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock, no par value, authorized 1,000,000 Shares; none
issued
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Class
A common stock, par value $.10 per share - authorized 10,000,000
shares;
outstanding 2,191,804 and 2,545,644 shares, respectively (net
of 1,072,770
treasury shares)
|
219
|
255
|
|||||
Class
B common stock, par value $.10 per share - authorized 30,000,000
shares;
outstanding 9,370,643 and 9,286,627 shares, respectively (net
of 3,218,310
treasury shares)
|
937
|
929
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
19,839
|
29,107
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
218,107
|
214,580
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(1,568
|
)
|
(344
|
)
|
|||
Total
Stockholders' Equity
|
237,534
|
244,527
|
|||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND
|
|||||||
STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
$
|
288,502
|
$
|
293,860
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
-
3 -
BEL
FUSE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(dollars
in thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Net
Sales
|
$
|
66,964
|
$
|
66,379
|
$
|
200,287
|
$
|
189,798
|
|||||
Costs
and expenses:
|
|||||||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
56,337
|
52,288
|
165,292
|
148,778
|
|||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
8,934
|
8,673
|
27,151
|
27,334
|
|||||||||
Restructuring
charge
|
329
|
-
|
329
|
-
|
|||||||||
Gain
on sale of property, plant and equipment
|
-
|
(307
|
)
|
-
|
(1,187
|
)
|
|||||||
65,600
|
60,654
|
192,772
|
174,925
|
||||||||||
Income
from operations
|
1,364
|
5,725
|
7,515
|
14,873
|
|||||||||
Interest
expense and other costs
|
(1
|
)
|
(1
|
)
|
(2
|
)
|
(125
|
)
|
|||||
(Impairment
charge)/gain on sale of investment
|
(1,397
|
)
|
-
|
(4,030
|
)
|
2,508
|
|||||||
Interest
income
|
529
|
1,144
|
2,047
|
2,980
|
|||||||||
Earnings
before (benefit) provision for income taxes
|
495
|
6,868
|
5,530
|
20,236
|
|||||||||
Income
tax (benefit) provision
|
(1,451
|
)
|
954
|
(394
|
)
|
4,155
|
|||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
1,946
|
$
|
5,914
|
$
|
5,924
|
$
|
16,081
|
|||||
Earnings
per Class A common share
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.16
|
$
|
0.47
|
$
|
0.47
|
$
|
1.29
|
|||||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.16
|
$
|
0.47
|
$
|
0.47
|
$
|
1.29
|
|||||
Weighted
average Class A common shares outstanding
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
2,325,745
|
2,621,623
|
2,460,550
|
2,661,750
|
|||||||||
Diluted
|
2,325,745
|
2,621,623
|
2,460,550
|
2,661,750
|
|||||||||
Earnings
per Class B common share
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.17
|
$
|
0.50
|
$
|
0.52
|
$
|
1.37
|
|||||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.17
|
$
|
0.50
|
$
|
0.51
|
$
|
1.37
|
|||||
Weighted
average Class B common shares outstanding
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
9,134,643
|
9,275,962
|
9,126,499
|
9,228,038
|
|||||||||
Diluted
|
9,373,347
|
9,292,095
|
9,346,611
|
9,253,930
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
-
4 -
BEL
FUSE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(dollars
in thousands)
|
Accumulated
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Compre-
|
Other
|
Class A
|
Class B
|
Additional
|
||||||||||||||||||
hensive
|
Retained
|
Comprehensive
|
Common
|
Common
|
Paid-In
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
|
Income
|
Earnings
|
Income (loss)
|
Stock
|
Stock
|
Capital
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
January 1, 2007
|
$
|
222,150
|
$
|
190,953
|
$
|
(1,816
|
)
|
$
|
270
|
$
|
917
|
$
|
31,826
|
|||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
1,452
|
6
|
1,446
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Tax
benefits arising from the disposition of non-qualified incentive
stock
options
|
149
|
149
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
dividends declared on Class A common stock
|
(534
|
)
|
(534
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Cash
dividends declared on Class B common stock
|
(2,175
|
)
|
(2,175
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of restricted common stock
|
-
|
7
|
(7
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Termination
of restricted common stock
|
-
|
(1
|
)
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase/retirement
of Class A common stock
|
(5,733
|
)
|
(15
|
)
|
(5,718
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||
Currency
translation adjustment
|
960
|
960
|
960
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
holding gains on marketable
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
securities
arising during the year, net of taxes
|
2,077
|
2,077
|
2,077
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for gains
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
included
in net earnings, net of taxes
|
(2,058
|
)
|
(2,058
|
)
|
(2,058
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
1,410
|
1,410
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Change
in unfunded SERP liability, net of taxes
|
493
|
493
|
493
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
26,336
|
26,336
|
26,336
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
$
|
27,808
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2007
|
$
|
244,527
|
$
|
214,580
|
$
|
(344
|
)
|
$
|
255
|
$
|
929
|
$
|
29,107
|
|||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
312
|
3
|
309
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Tax
benefits arising from the disposition
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
of
non-qualified incentive stock options
|
79
|
79
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash
dividends declared on Class A
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
common
stock
|
(448
|
)
|
(448
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Cash
dividends declared on Class B
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
common
stock
|
(1,949
|
)
|
(1,949
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of restricted common stock
|
-
|
6
|
(6
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Termination
of restricted common stock
|
-
|
(1
|
)
|
1
|
||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase/retirement
of Class A
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
common
stock
|
(10,785
|
)
|
(36
|
)
|
(10,749
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||
Currency
translation adjustment
|
(6
|
)
|
(6
|
)
|
(6
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
holding losses on marketable
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
securities
arising during the year, net of taxes
|
(3,460
|
)
|
(3,460
|
)
|
(3,460
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||
Reclassification
adjustment of unrealized holding losses for
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
impairment
charge included in net earnings, net of taxes
|
2,242
|
2,242
|
2,242
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
1,098
|
1,098
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
5,924
|
5,924
|
5,924
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
$
|
4,700
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
September 30, 2008
|
$
|
237,534
|
$
|
218,107
|
$
|
(1,568
|
)
|
$
|
219
|
$
|
937
|
$
|
19,839
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
-
5 -
BEL
FUSE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollars
in thousands)
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||
September 30,
|
|||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Cash flows from
operating activities:
|
|||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
5,924
|
$
|
16,081
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net earnings to net
|
|||||||
cash
provided by operating activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
5,439
|
5,813
|
|||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
1,083
|
1,055
|
|||||
Excess
tax benefits from share-based
|
|||||||
payment
arrangements
|
(79
|
)
|
(138
|
)
|
|||
Loss
(gain) on sale of property, plant and equipment
|
84
|
(1,187
|
)
|
||||
Impairment
charge (gain on sale) on investment
|
4,030
|
(2,508
|
)
|
||||
Unrealized
foreign exchange transaction losses
|
141
|
-
|
|||||
Other,
net
|
607
|
387
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
(1,081
|
)
|
(2,018
|
)
|
|||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities
|
(3,021
|
)
|
(1,341
|
)
|
|||
Net
Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
13,127
|
16,144
|
|||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|||||||
Purchase
of property, plant and equipment
|
(5,279
|
)
|
(6,160
|
)
|
|||
Purchase
of intangible asset
|
(300
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Purchase
of marketable securities
|
(12,524
|
)
|
(11,801
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from sale of marketable securities
|
-
|
27,499
|
|||||
Proceeds
from sale of property, plant and equipment
|
2,256
|
3,628
|
|||||
Redemption
of investment
|
14,433
|
-
|
|||||
Net
Cash (Used In) Provided by Investing Activities
|
(1,414
|
)
|
13,166
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
-
6 -
BEL
FUSE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
(dollars
in thousands)
Nine Months Ended
|
|||||||
September 30,
|
|||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options
|
312
|
1,336
|
|||||
Dividends
paid to common shareholders
|
(2,362
|
)
|
(1,685
|
)
|
|||
Purchase
and retirement of Class A
|
|||||||
common
stock
|
(10,785
|
)
|
(4,125
|
)
|
|||
Excess
tax benefits from share-based
|
|||||||
payment
arrangements
|
79
|
138
|
|||||
Net
Cash Used In Financing Activities
|
(12,756
|
)
|
(4,336
|
)
|
|||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash
|
(61
|
)
|
316
|
||||
Net
(Decrease) Increase in Cash
|
|||||||
and
Cash Equivalents
|
(1,104
|
)
|
25,290
|
||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
|
|||||||
-
beginning of period
|
83,875
|
76,761
|
|||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
|
|||||||
-
end of period
|
$
|
82,771
|
$
|
102,051
|
|||
Changes
in operating assets
|
|||||||
and
liabilities consist of:
|
|||||||
Decrease
(increase) in accounts receivable
|
$
|
4,916
|
$
|
(3,584
|
)
|
||
(Increase)
decrease in inventories
|
(10,088
|
)
|
3,888
|
||||
Increase
in prepaid expenses
|
|||||||
and
other current assets
|
(158
|
)
|
(84
|
)
|
|||
Increase
in other assets
|
(64
|
)
|
(2,004
|
)
|
|||
Increase
in accounts payable
|
2,222
|
1,404
|
|||||
Decrease
in income taxes
|
(1,496
|
)
|
(2,360
|
)
|
|||
Increase
in accrued expenses
|
1,647
|
1,399
|
|||||
$
|
(3,021
|
)
|
$
|
(1,341
|
)
|
||
Supplementary
information:
|
|||||||
Cash
paid during the period for income taxes
|
$
|
2,017
|
$
|
8,763
|
See
notes
to condensed consolidated financial statements.
-
7 -
BEL
FUSE
INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.
|
BASIS
OF PRESENTATION AND ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
|
The
condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2008, and the
condensed
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows
for
the periods presented herein have been prepared by Bel Fuse Inc. (the "Company"
or "Bel") and are unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments
(consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present
fairly
the financial position, results of operations, changes in stockholders'
equity
and cash flows for all periods presented have been made. The results for
the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 should not be viewed as
indicative of the Company’s annual results or the Company’s results for any
other period. The information for the condensed consolidated balance sheet
as of
December 31, 2007 was derived from audited financial statements. These
financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and footnotes thereto included in the Bel Form 10-K for the
year
ended December 31, 2007.
Certain
reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform to
the
current year presentation, principally in the detailed disclosures within
the
footnotes pertaining to the business segment information and accrued expenses.
In addition, a prior year reclassification between accounts payable and
accrued
expenses is reflected in the accompanying balance sheet as of December
31, 2007
and statement of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
2.
|
EARNINGS
PER SHARE
|
The
Company utilizes the two-class method to report its earnings per share.
The
two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings
per
share for each class of common stock according to dividends declared and
participation rights in undistributed earnings. The Company’s Certificate of
Incorporation, as amended, states that Class B common shares are entitled
to
dividends at least 5% greater than dividends paid to Class A common shares,
resulting in the two-class method of computing earnings per share. In computing
earnings per share, the Company has allocated dividends declared to Class
A and
Class B based on amounts actually declared for each class of stock and
5% more
of the undistributed earnings have been allocated to Class B shares than
to the
Class A shares on a per share basis. Basic earnings per common share are
computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share,
for
each class of common stock, are computed by dividing net earnings by the
weighted average number of common shares and potential common shares outstanding
during the period. Potential common shares used in computing diluted earnings
per share relate to restricted Class B common shares and stock options
for Class
B common shares which, if exercised, would have a dilutive effect on earnings
per share.
-
8 -
The
earnings and weighted average shares outstanding used in the computation
of
basic and diluted earnings per share are as follows (dollars in thousands,
except share and per share data):
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Numerator:
|
|||||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
1,946
|
$
|
5,914
|
$
|
5,924
|
$
|
16,081
|
|||||
Less
Dividends:
|
|||||||||||||
Class
A
|
142
|
156
|
448
|
383
|
|||||||||
Class
B
|
644
|
639
|
1,949
|
1,531
|
|||||||||
Undistributed
earnings
|
$
|
1,160
|
$
|
5,119
|
$
|
3,527
|
$
|
14,167
|
|||||
Undistributed
earnings allocation - basic:
|
|||||||||||||
Class
A undistributed earnings
|
226
|
1,086
|
721
|
3,053
|
|||||||||
Class
B undistributed earnings
|
934
|
4,033
|
2,806
|
11,114
|
|||||||||
Total
undistributed earnings
|
$
|
1,160
|
$
|
5,119
|
$
|
3,527
|
$
|
14,167
|
|||||
Undistributed
earnings allocation - diluted:
|
|||||||||||||
Class
A undistributed earnings
|
222
|
1,084
|
707
|
3,046
|
|||||||||
Class
B undistributed earnings
|
938
|
4,035
|
2,820
|
11,121
|
|||||||||
Total
undistributed earnings
|
$
|
1,160
|
$
|
5,119
|
$
|
3,527
|
$
|
14,167
|
|||||
Net
earnings allocation - basic:
|
|||||||||||||
Class
A allocated earnings
|
368
|
1,242
|
1,169
|
3,436
|
|||||||||
Class
B allocated earnings
|
1,578
|
4,672
|
4,755
|
12,645
|
|||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
1,946
|
$
|
5,914
|
$
|
5,924
|
$
|
16,081
|
|||||
Net
earnings allocation - diluted:
|
|||||||||||||
Class
A allocated earnings
|
364
|
1,240
|
1,155
|
3,429
|
|||||||||
Class
B allocated earnings
|
1,582
|
4,674
|
4,769
|
12,652
|
|||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
1,946
|
$
|
5,914
|
$
|
5,924
|
$
|
16,081
|
|||||
Denominator:
|
|||||||||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding:
|
|||||||||||||
Class
A - basic and diluted
|
2,325,745
|
2,621,623
|
2,460,550
|
2,661,750
|
|||||||||
Class
B - basic
|
9,134,643
|
9,275,962
|
9,126,499
|
9,228,038
|
|||||||||
Dilutive
impact of stock options and
|
|||||||||||||
unvested
restricted stock awards
|
238,704
|
16,133
|
220,112
|
25,892
|
|||||||||
Class
B - diluted
|
9,373,347
|
9,292,095
|
9,346,611
|
9,253,930
|
|||||||||
Earnings
per share:
|
|||||||||||||
Class
A - basic
|
$
|
0.16
|
$
|
0.47
|
$
|
0.47
|
$
|
1.29
|
|||||
Class
A - diluted
|
$
|
0.16
|
$
|
0.47
|
$
|
0.47
|
$
|
1.29
|
|||||
|
|||||||||||||
Class
B - basic
|
$
|
0.17
|
$
|
0.50
|
$
|
0.52
|
$
|
1.37
|
|||||
Class
B - diluted
|
$
|
0.17
|
$
|
0.50
|
$
|
0.51
|
$
|
1.37
|
-
9 -
During
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and during the three
and nine
months ended September 30, 2007, 53,000 and 14,000 outstanding options,
respectively, were not included in the foregoing computations for Class
B common
shares because their effect would be antidilutive.
3. MARKETABLE
SECURITIES
At
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, marketable securities
with a cost of approximately $18.2 million and $5.6 million had an estimated
fair value of approximately $10.8 million and $3.3 million. During the
three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recorded pre-tax charges
of
$1.3 million and $3.6 million, respectively, related to the other-than-temporary
impairment of its investment in Toko, Inc. (“Toko”). In addition, the Company
recorded pre-tax charges of $0.1 million and $0.4 million during the three
and
nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively related to the impairment
of
its investment in the Columbia Strategic Cash Portfolio (the “Columbia
Portfolio”). At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, gross
unrealized losses on other marketable securities of approximately $3.8
million
and $2.3 million are included, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss). During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company
sold
4,034,000 shares of common stock of Toko on the open market which resulted
in a
realized gain of $2.5 million.
Included
in other assets at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are marketable
securities designated for utilization in accordance with the Company’s SERP plan
with a cost of approximately $4.6 million, and an estimated fair value
of
approximately $4.4 million and $4.9 million, respectively. Such unrealized
net
gains (losses) are included, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive
loss.
Columbia
Portfolio:
At
September 30, 2008, the Company’s investment securities included privately
placed units of beneficial interests in the Columbia Portfolio, which is
an
enhanced cash fund sold as an alternative to money-market funds. During
the
latter half of 2007, the Company invested a portion of its cash balances
on hand
in this fund. In December 2007, due to adverse market conditions, the fund
was
overwhelmed with withdrawal requests from investors and it was closed with
a
restriction placed upon the cash redemption ability of its holders. As
a result,
the Company redesignated the Columbia Portfolio units from cash equivalents
(as
previously classified during the second and third quarters of 2007) to
short-term investments or long-term investments based upon the liquidation
schedule provided by the fund. At the time the liquidation was announced,
the
Company held 25.7 million units of the Columbia Portfolio at a book value
of
$25.7 million.
As
of
September 30, 2008, the Company has received total cash redemptions to
date of
$16.7 million (including $14.4 million in the nine months ended September
30,
2008) at a weighted-average net asset value of $.9785 per unit. As the
net asset
value continues to decline, the Company has been recording impairment charges
on
this investment. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
the
Company recorded $0.1 million and $0.4 million in impairment charges,
respectively. As such, the additional realized gains and losses recorded
at the
time of the redemptions were minimal. As of September 30, 2008, the Company
holds 8.6 million units at a book value of $8.2 million. Subsequent to
September
30, 2008, the net asset value associated with the Columbia Portfolio continued
to decline and as of October 31, 2008, the Company recorded additional
unrealized losses of $0.3 million related to this investment. Information
and
the markets relating to these investments remain dynamic, and there may
be
further declines in the value of these investments, the value of the collateral
held by these entities, and the liquidity of the Company’s investments. To the
extent that the Company determines that there is a further decline in fair
value, the Company may recognize additional impairment charges in future
periods
up to the aggregate amount of these investments.
-
10 -
Toko:
As
of
September 30, 2008, the Company owned a total of 1,840,919 shares, or
approximately 1.9%,
of the
outstanding shares,
of the
common stock of Toko. The Company’s original cost of these shares was $5.6
million ($3.07 per share). Toko develops, manufactures and sells power
supply
related components and radio frequency related components primarily in
Japan.
Toko had a market capitalization of approximately $107.3 million as of
September
30, 2008. These shares are reflected on the Company’s condensed consolidated
balance sheets as marketable securities. These marketable securities are
considered to be available for sale under SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities”. In accordance with FASB Staff
Position (“FSP”) 115-1, the Company periodically reviews its marketable
securities and determines whether the investments are other-than-temporarily
impaired. During the second quarter of 2008, the Company deemed this investment
to be other-than-temporarily impaired and recorded a pre-tax impairment
charge
of $2.4 million to write this investment to its fair value at June 30,
2008
($1.79 per share). The Company deemed this investment to be
other-than-temporarily impaired as of September 30, 2008 and has recorded
a
pre-tax impairment charge of $1.3 million during the third quarter of 2008
to
write down this investment to its fair value at September 30, 2008 ($1.10
per
share). The Company reviewed various factors in making its determination,
including volatility of the Toko share price since June 30, 2008, Toko’s recent
financial results and the Company’s intention and ability to hold the
investment. The Toko share price has been highly volatile during the third
quarter as it declined from $1.79 per share at June 30, 2008 to $1.10 per
share
at September 30, 2008. While the Company has the intent and ability to
hold this
investment until it is in a gain position, there is no indication that
the Toko
stock price will rise above the Company’s adjusted cost basis within the
foreseeable future.
Power-One,
Inc.:
On
February 25, 2008, the Company announced that it had acquired 4,370,052
shares
of Power-One, Inc. (“Power-One”) common stock representing, to the Company’s
knowledge, 5% of Power-One’s outstanding common stock, at a total purchase price
of $10.1 million ($2.32 per share). Power-One’s common stock is quoted on the
NASDAQ Global Market. Power-One is a designer and manufacturer of power
conversion and power management products. As of September 30, 2008, the
Company
has recorded an unrealized loss, net of income tax, of approximately $2.3
million which is included in accumulated other comprehensive loss in
stockholders’ equity. The Company reviewed various factors in determining
whether an other-than-temporary impairment exists on its investment in
Power-One
at September 30, 2008. These factors included volatility of the Power-One
share
price, Power-One’s recent financial results and recent changes made to its
executive management, as well as the Company’s intention and ability to hold the
investment. The Power-One share price has been extremely volatile since
the
Company’s purchase of this stock, ranging from $1.23 - $3.70, with an average
closing price of $2.46 during the ownership period. The Company has the
ability
and intent to hold this investment until the market improves. In addition,
during early October, the Company purchased an additional 2,968,946 shares
of
Power-One stock representing, to the Company’s knowledge, an additional 3.4% of
Power-One’s outstanding common stock, at a total purchase price of $14.1
million. Based on all factors reviewed, the Company does not believe that
the
investment in Power-One is other-than-temporarily impaired as of September
30,
2008.
-
11 -
Stephens,
Inc.:
During
June 2008, the Company invested $2.4 million in certificates of deposit
(CDs)
with Stephens, Inc., with whom the Company has an investment banking
relationship. During October 2008, the Company invested an additional $2.5
million in CDs with Stephen, Inc. These investments are part of the Certificate
of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) program whereby the funds are
allocated to various banks in order to achieve FDIC insurance on the full
invested amount. The CDs have an initial maturity of 26-weeks and an early
redemption feature with a 30-day interest penalty.
Effective
January 1, 2008, the Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 for
its
financial assets and liabilities. Although this partial adoption of SFAS
157 had
no material impact on its financial condition, results of operations or
cash
flows, the Company is now required to provide additional disclosures as
part of
its financial statements. SFAS 157 clarifies that fair value is an exit
price,
representing the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid
to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at
the measurement date. The Company utilizes market data or assumptions that
market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. SFAS 157
establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs
used
in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable
inputs such as quoted market prices in active markets; Level 2, defined
as
inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly
or
indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs about
which
little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop
its
own assumptions.
As
of
September 30, 2008, the Company held certain financial assets that are
measured
at fair value on a recurring basis. These consisted of the Company’s investments
in Toko and Power-One stock (categorized as available-for-sale securities)
and
the marketable securities designated for utilization in accordance with
the
Company’s SERP plan (categorized as a long-term investment in other assets). The
fair value of these investments is determined based on quoted market prices
in
public markets and is categorized as Level 1. The Company does not have
any
financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis categorized
as
Level 2 or Level 3, and there were no transfers in or out of Level 2 or
Level 3
during the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
The
following table sets forth by level, within SFAS 157’s fair value hierarchy, the
Company’s financial assets accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as
of September 30, 2008 (dollars in thousands).
-
12 -
Assets at Fair Value as of September 30, 2008
|
|||||||||||||
Total
|
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
||||||||||
Available-for-sale
securities
|
$
|
10,778
|
$
|
10,778
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
Other
long-term investments
|
4,388
|
4,388
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Total
|
$
|
15,166
|
$
|
15,166
|
-
|
-
|
The
following table sets forth by level within SFAS 157’s fair value hierarchy of
the Company’s financial assets accounted for at fair value on a nonrecurring
basis as of September 30, 2008 (dollars in thousands). These consisted
of the
Company’s investment in the Columbia Portfolio (categorized as an other
investment in the table below). The fair value of these investments is
determined based on significant other observable inputs and is categorized
as
Level 2 (dollars in thousands).
Assets at Fair Value as of September 30, 2008
|
Total Gains (Losses)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
Three Months
Ended
September 30,
2008
|
Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2008
|
||||||||||||||
Other
investments
|
$
|
8,233
|
-
|
$
|
8,233
|
-
|
($135
|
)
|
($412
|
)
|
|||||||||
Total
|
$
|
8,233
|
-
|
$
|
8,233
|
-
|
($135
|
)
|
($412
|
)
|
There
were no changes to the Company’s valuation techniques used to measure asset fair
values on a recurring or nonrecurring basis during the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and the Company did not have any financial liabilities
as of
September 30, 2008.
4. INVENTORIES
The
components of inventories are as follows (dollars in thousands):
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Raw materials
|
$
|
28,917
|
$
|
24,089
|
|||
Work in progress
|
2,662
|
2,434
|
|||||
Finished
goods
|
17,557
|
12,526
|
|||||
$
|
49,136
|
$
|
39,049
|
-
13 -
5. BUSINESS
SEGMENT INFORMATION
The
Company operates in one industry with three reportable segments. The segments
are geographic and include North America, Asia and Europe. The primary
criteria
by which financial performance is evaluated and resources are allocated
are
revenues and operating income. The following is a summary of key financial
data
(dollars in thousands):
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Total
segment revenues
|
|||||||||||||
North
America
|
$
|
17,980
|
$
|
22,886
|
$
|
64,993
|
$
|
65,058
|
|||||
Asia
|
50,505
|
47,835
|
145,879
|
133,938
|
|||||||||
Europe
|
7,516
|
6,769
|
21,926
|
24,748
|
|||||||||
Total
segment revenues
|
76,001
|
77,490
|
232,798
|
223,744
|
|||||||||
Reconciling
items:
|
|||||||||||||
Intersegment
revenues
|
(9,037
|
)
|
(11,111
|
)
|
(32,511
|
)
|
(33,946
|
)
|
|||||
Net
sales
|
$
|
66,964
|
$
|
66,379
|
$
|
200,287
|
$
|
189,798
|
|||||
Income
from Operations:
|
|||||||||||||
North
America
|
$
|
118
|
$
|
793
|
$
|
2,862
|
$
|
2,904
|
|||||
Asia
|
1,095
|
4,545
|
3,399
|
10,933
|
|||||||||
Europe
|
151
|
387
|
1,254
|
1,036
|
|||||||||
$
|
1,364
|
$
|
5,725
|
$
|
7,515
|
$
|
14,873
|
6.
DEBT
Short-term
debt
On
April
30, 2008, the Company renewed its unsecured credit agreement in the amount
of
$20 million, which expires on September 10, 2011. There have not been any
borrowings under the credit agreement and as such, there was no balance
outstanding as of September 30, 2008. At that date, the entire $20 million
line
of credit was available to the Company to borrow. The credit agreement
bears
interest at LIBOR plus 0.75% to 1.25% based on certain financial statement
ratios maintained by the Company.
The
Company’s Hong Kong subsidiary had an unsecured line of credit of approximately
$2 million which was unused as of September 30, 2008. The line of credit
expires
on January 31, 2009. Any borrowing on the line of credit will be guaranteed
by
the U.S. parent. The line of credit bears interest at a rate determined
by the
bank as the financing is extended.
Included
in interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 is the
write-off of approximately $0.1 million of previously unamortized deferred
financing charges in connection with the Company’s prior credit
facility.
-
14 -
7. INCOME
TAXES
The
Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting
for
Uncertainties in Income Taxes (“FIN 48”), on January 1, 2007. Although the
implementation of FIN 48 did not impact the total amount of the Company’s
liabilities for uncertain tax positions, which amounted to $12.4 million
at
January 1, 2007, the Company separately recognizes the liability for uncertain
tax positions on its balance sheet. Included in the liabilities for uncertain
tax positions at the date of adoption is $1.4 million for interest and
penalties.
At
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company has approximately
$7.6
million and $9.2 million, respectively, of liabilities for uncertain tax
positions (including interest and penalties). Of these amounts, the current
portions of $4.1 million and $2.3 million are included in income tax payable
and
the noncurrent portions of $3.5 million and $6.9 million are included in
liability for uncertain tax positions. These liabilities for uncertain
tax
positions, if recognized, would reduce the Company’s effective tax
rate.
The
Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal
jurisdiction and various states and foreign jurisdictions. The Company
is no
longer subject to U.S. federal examinations by tax authorities for years
before
2005 and for state examinations before 2004. Regarding foreign subsidiaries,
the
Company is no longer subject to examination by tax authorities for years
before
2001. The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) commenced an examination of the
Company’s U.S. income tax returns for 2004 and reviewed 2003 and 2005 during the
fourth quarter of 2006. The 2004 statute of limitations expired on September
15,
2008.
During
2008, the Company was audited by the State of New Jersey, Department of
the
Treasury, Division of Taxation (“New Jersey”) for the years ended December 31,
2003 through 2006. The State of New Jersey originally proposed a tax adjustment
for the years 2003 through 2006 in the amount of $0.2 million. The Company
challenged the state’s positions on these matters which resulted in a minimal
tax assessment. During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, the Company
reversed the $0.2 million tax assessment previously accrued to the minimal
assessment.
During
February 2008, the Company received correspondence from the State of California
Franchise Tax Board. They requested copies of U.S. federal income tax returns
for the years 2005 and 2006 for further analysis to determine if the tax
returns
will be selected for audit. On July 3, 2008 the Company received correspondence
from the State of California that the tax returns for the years 2005 and
2006
will not be audited at this time.
The
Inland Revenue Department (“IRD”) of Hong Kong commenced an examination of one
of the Company’s Hong Kong subsidiaries’ income tax returns for the years 2000
through 2005 and issued a notice of additional assessment during 2007 and
demand
for tax in the amount of $3.8 million. This was paid in May and August
2007.
There are no interest or penalties in connection with this assessment.
The IRD
proposed certain adjustments to the Company’s offshore income tax claim
position, with which Company management agreed.
During
the quarter ended September 30, 2008, certain statute of limitations expired
which resulted in a reversal of a previously recognized liability for uncertain
tax positions in the amount of $2.3 million. This was offset by certain
changes
in estimates for prior year taxes arising from the finalization of the
2007 tax
returns, together with the resolution of the Bel Fuse, Inc. State of New
Jersey
tax examination in the total amount of $0.5 million. During the quarter
ended
September 30, 2007, certain statute of limitations expired which resulted
in a
reversal of a previously recognized liability for uncertain tax positions
in the
amount of $1.4 million. This was offset by an increase in the liability
for
uncertain tax positions of $1.0 million and certain changes in estimates
for
prior year taxes which reduced the income tax provision by approximately
$0.4
million.
-
15 -
As
a
result of the expiration of the statute of limitations for specific
jurisdictions, it is reasonably possible that the related unrecognized
benefits
for tax positions taken regarding previously filed tax returns may change
materially from those recorded as liabilities for uncertain tax positions
in the
Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements at September 30, 2008. It
is currently estimated that approximately $4.1 million of previously recorded
liabilities for uncertain tax positions will reverse due to the expiration
of
the statute of limitations by September 30, 2009. Nonetheless, the Company
may
be required to offset some portion of this reversal to the extent there
are
future tax examinations or other tax exposures.
The
Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax
positions as a component of the current provision for income taxes. During
the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company recognized
approximately $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively in interest and
penalties in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company
has approximately $1.8 million and $1.6 million accrued for the payment
of
interest and penalties at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively, which is included in both income taxes payable and liability
for
uncertain tax positions in the Condensed Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
8. ACCRUED
EXPENSES
Accrued
expenses consist of the following (dollars in thousands):
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Sales commissions
|
$
|
1,767
|
$
|
1,903
|
|||
Contract
labor
|
3,162
|
1,723
|
|||||
Salaries,
bonuses and
|
|||||||
related
benefits
|
4,398
|
4,082
|
|||||
Other
|
3,591
|
3,575
|
|||||
$
|
12,918
|
$
|
11,283
|
9. RETIREMENT
FUND AND PROFIT SHARING PLAN
The
Company maintains a domestic profit sharing plan and a contributory stock
ownership and savings 401(K) plan, which combines stock ownership and individual
voluntary savings provisions to provide retirement benefits for plan
participants. The
expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 amounted
to
approximately $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively. The expense
for the
three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 amounted to approximately
$0.1
million for both periods. As of September 30, 2008, the plans owned 17,113
and
157,478 shares of Bel Fuse Inc. Class A and Class B common stock,
respectively.
-
16 -
The
Company's subsidiaries in Asia have a retirement fund covering substantially
all
of their Hong Kong based full-time employees. The
expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 amounted
to
approximately $0.3 million for both periods. The expense for the three
months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 amounted to approximately $0.1 million
for
both periods. As of September 30, 2008, the plan owned 3,323 and 17,342
shares
of Bel Fuse Inc. Class A and Class B common stock, respectively.
The
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the "SERP" or the “Plan”) is designed to
provide a limited group of key management and highly compensated employees
of
the Company with
supplemental
retirement and death benefits.
The
components of SERP expense are as follows (dollars in thousands):
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Service
cost
|
$
|
73
|
$
|
146
|
$
|
220
|
$
|
437
|
|||||
Interest
cost
|
76
|
29
|
227
|
86
|
|||||||||
Amortization
of adjustments
|
33
|
17
|
100
|
52
|
|||||||||
Total
SERP expense
|
$
|
182
|
$
|
192
|
$
|
547
|
$
|
575
|
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Balance sheet
amounts:
|
|||||||
Minimum
pension obligation
|
|||||||
and
unfunded pension liability
|
$
|
5,182
|
$
|
4,698
|
|||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(1,154 |
)
|
(1,154 |
)
|
Included
in other assets at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are marketable
securities designated for utilization in accordance with the Company’s SERP plan
with a cost of approximately $4.6 million, and an estimated fair value
of
approximately $4.4 million and $4.9 million, respectively. Such unrealized
net
gains (losses) are included, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive
loss. The
Company contributed $0.1 million to these investments during the nine months
ended September 30, 2008.
10.
SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
The
Company records compensation expense in its Condensed Consolidated Statements
of
Operations related to employee stock-based options and awards in accordance
with
SFAS No. 123(R) “Share-Based Payment”. The aggregate pretax compensation cost
recognized in net earnings for stock-based compensation (including incentive
stock options and restricted stock, as further discussed below) amounted
to
approximately $1.1 million for each of the nine month periods ended September
30, 2008 and 2007. For each of the three month periods ended September
30, 2008
and 2007, the aggregate compensation cost recognized in net earnings amounted
to
$0.4 million. The Company did not use any cash to settle any equity instruments
granted under share-based arrangements during the nine months ended September
30, 2008 and 2007.
-
17 -
Stock
Options
The
Company has an
equity
compensation program
(the
"Program")
which
provides for the granting of "Incentive Stock Options" within
the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended,
non-qualified stock options and restricted stock awards. No
stock
options were granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 or
2007.
Information
regarding the Company’s stock
options
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 is as follows. All of the stock options
noted below relate to options to purchase shares of the Company’s Class B common
stock.
Average
|
Contractual
|
Intrinsic
|
|||||||||||
Options
|
Shares
|
Exercise Price
|
Term
|
Value (000's)
|
|||||||||
Outstanding
at January 1, 2008
|
70,000
|
$
|
28.42
|
||||||||||
Granted
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(16,500
|
)
|
18.89
|
||||||||||
Forfeited
or expired
|
(500
|
)
|
18.89
|
||||||||||
Outstanding
at September 30, 2008
|
53,000
|
$
|
31.48
|
1.5
years
|
$
|
-
|
|||||||
Exercisable
at September 30, 2008
|
38,000
|
$
|
32.26
|
1.4
years
|
$
|
-
|
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 the Company received
$0.3
million and $1.3 million, respectively, from the exercise of stock options
and
realized minimal tax benefits during the nine months ended September 30,
2008
and $0.1 million in tax benefits during the nine months ended September
30,
2007. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $0.2 million and $0.9 million,
respectively. Stock compensation expense applicable to stock options was
minimal
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and was approximately $0.1
million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
-
18 -
A
summary
of the status of the Company's nonvested stock options as of December 31,
2007
and changes during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 is presented
below:
Weighted-Average
|
|||||||
Grant-Date
|
|||||||
Nonvested Stock Options
|
Shares
|
Fair Value
|
|||||
Nonvested
at December 31, 2007
|
33,500
|
$
|
30.28
|
||||
Granted
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Vested
|
(18,500
|
)
|
29.50
|
||||
Forfeited
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Nonvested
at September 30, 2008
|
15,000
|
$
|
29.50
|
At
September 30, 2008, the Company has recognized all costs related to nonvested
stock options arrangements under the Program.
Currently, the Company believes that substantially all options will vest.
Restricted
Stock Awards
The
Company provides common stock awards to certain officers and key associates.
The
Company grants these awards, at its discretion, from the shares available
under
the Program.
Unless otherwise provided at the date of grant or unless subsequently
accelerated, the
shares
awarded vest in 25% increments on the second,
third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the award,
respectively, and are distributed provided the employee has remained employed
by
the Company through such anniversary dates; otherwise the unearned shares
are
forfeited. The market value of these shares at the date of award is recorded
as
compensation expense on the straight-line method over the five year
periods from the respective award dates, as adjusted for forfeitures of
unvested
awards. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company
issued 56,300 and 74,200 Class B common shares, respectively, under a restricted
stock plan to various employees. Pre-tax compensation expense was $1.1
million
and $1.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively and $0.4 million for the three months ended September 30,
2008 and
2007.
A
summary
of the activity under the Restricted Stock Awards Plan as of January 1, 2008 and
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 is presented below:
Restricted
Stock
|
Award
|
Contractual
|
||||||||
Awards
|
Shares
|
Price
|
Term
|
|||||||
Outstanding
at January 1, 2008
|
195,400
|
$
|
35.31
|
3.43
years
|
||||||
Granted
|
56,300
|
24.47
|
||||||||
Vested
|
(4,500
|
)
|
30.67
|
|||||||
Forfeited
|
(11,200
|
)
|
32.23
|
|||||||
Outstanding
at September 30, 2008
|
236,000
|
$
|
32.96
|
3.13
years
|
-
19 -
As
of
September 30, 2008, there was $4.9 million of total pre-tax unrecognized
compensation cost included within additional paid-in-capital related to
non-vested stock based compensation arrangements granted under the restricted
stock award plan; that cost is expected to be recognized over a period
of 4.6
years. The
Company's policy is to issue new shares to satisfy Restricted Stock Awards
and
incentive stock option exercises. In calculating the stock-based compensation
expense related to stock awards, the Company has estimated that 5% of the
outstanding unvested stock awards will forfeit each year related to employee
attrition.
11.
COMMON STOCK
During
2000, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the purchase of
up to ten
percent of the Company’s outstanding common shares. As of September 30, 2008,
the Company had purchased and retired 23,600 Class B common shares at a
cost of
approximately $0.8 million and had purchased and retired 510,925 Class
A common
shares at a cost of approximately $16.5 million. No shares of Class B common
stock were repurchased during the nine months ended September 30, 2008
and
350,892 shares of Class A common stock were repurchased principally from
a
related party during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 at a cost
of $10.8
million. Of such shares, 325,396 shares were repurchased during the three
months
ended September 30, 2008.
As
of
September 30, 2008, there was one shareholder of the Company’s common stock with
ownership in excess of 10% of Class A outstanding shares with no ownership
of
the Company’s Class B common stock. In accordance with the Company’s certificate
of incorporation, the Class B Protection clause is triggered if a shareholder
owns 10% or more of the outstanding Class A common stock and does not own
an
equal or greater percentage of all then outstanding shares (both Class
A and
Class B common stock). If this clause is triggered, the shareholder must
within
90 days of the trigger date, purchase Class B common shares, in an amount
and at
a price determined in accordance with a formula described in the Company’s
certificate of incorporation or forfeit its right to vote its Class A common
shares. As of September 30, 2008, to the Company’s knowledge, this shareholder
had not purchased any Class B shares to comply with these requirements.
In order
to vote its shares at Bel’s next shareholders’ meeting, this shareholder must
either purchase the required number of Class B common shares or sell or
otherwise transfer Class A common shares until their Class A holdings are
under
10%. As of September 30, 2008, to the Company’s knowledge, this shareholder
owned 16.9% of the Company’s Class A common stock in the aggregate and had not
taken steps to either purchase the required number of Class B common shares
or
sell or otherwise transfer Class A common shares until its Class A holdings
fall
below 10%.
There
are
no contractual restrictions on the Company's ability to pay dividends provided
the Company is not in default immediately before such payment and after
giving
effect to such payment. On August 1, 2008, the Company paid a $0.07 per
share
dividend to all shareholders of record of Class B Common Stock in the total
amount of $0.6 million and a $0.06 per share dividend to all shareholders
of
record of Class A Common Stock in the total amount of $0.2 million.
-
20 -
12.
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Comprehensive
(loss) income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and
2007
consists of the following (dollars in thousands):
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
1,946
|
$
|
5,914
|
$
|
5,924
|
$
|
16,081
|
|||||
Currency
translation adjustment
|
(810
|
)
|
152
|
(6
|
)
|
486
|
|||||||
(Decrease)
increase in unrealized
|
|||||||||||||
gain
on marketable securities
|
|||||||||||||
-
net of taxes
|
(2,123
|
)
|
(267
|
)
|
(3,460
|
)
|
686
|
||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for
|
|||||||||||||
impairment
charge included in
|
|||||||||||||
net
earnings, net of tax
|
783
|
-
|
2,242
|
-
|
|||||||||
Comprehensive
(loss) income
|
$
|
(204
|
)
|
$
|
5,799
|
$
|
4,700
|
$
|
17,253
|
The
components of accumulated other comprehensive loss as of September 30,
2008 and
December 31, 2007 are summarized below (dollars in thousands):
September 30,
|
December 31,
|
||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
$
|
2,095
|
$
|
2,101
|
|||
Unrealized
holding loss on available-for-sale
|
|||||||
securities
under SFAS No. 115, net of taxes of
|
|||||||
$(1,533)
and $(789) as of September 30, 2008 and
|
|||||||
December
31, 2007
|
(2,509
|
)
|
(1,291
|
)
|
|||
Unfunded
SERP liability, net of taxes of ($483)
|
|||||||
as
of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007
|
(1,154
|
)
|
(1,154
|
)
|
|||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
$
|
(1,568
|
)
|
$
|
(344
|
)
|
-
21 -
13.
SALE
OF PROPERTY
During
May 2007, the Company sold a parcel of land located in Jersey City, New
Jersey
for $6.0 million. The Company had previously estimated that approximately
$0.8
million of the proceeds would be payable to the State of New Jersey, as
a
portion of the property is subject to tideland claims. In December 2007,
the
Tidelands Resource Council voted to approve the Bureau of Tideland’s
Management’s recommendation for a Statement of No Interest. On March 14, 2008,
the Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Protection signed a
letter
to approve the Statement of No Interest. As final approval of the Statement
of
No Interest is still pending, the Company has continued to defer the estimated
gain on sale of the land, in the amount of $4.6 million. Of the $6.0 million
sales price, the Company received cash of $1.5 million before closing costs,
and
$4.6 million (including interest) was being held in escrow pending final
resolution of the State of New Jersey tideland claim and certain environmental
costs. During 2007, the Company paid $0.4 million related to environmental
costs, which approximated the maximum amount for which the Company is liable.
During May 2008, the title company released $2.3 million of the escrow
and as
such, $2.3 million still remains in escrow and has been classified as restricted
cash as of September 30, 2008. The Company anticipates resolution of this
sale,
release of the remaining escrow and corresponding guarantees and recognition
of
the gain by the end of fiscal 2008. As the timing of the release of the
remaining escrow of $2.3 million is not under the Company’s control, it has been
classified in non-current assets as restricted cash and the deferred gain
of
$4.6 million has been classified in deferred gain on the sale of property
in the
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2008 and December
31,
2007.
14. NEW
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In
May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles” (“SFAS No. 162”). SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of
accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to
be used
in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities
that are
presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)
in
the United States. This Statement is effective sixty days following the
SEC’s
approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to
AU
Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles.” The Company is currently evaluating the
potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS No. 162 on its financial
statements.
In
March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities”, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“SFAS No.
161”). The new standard is intended to improve financial reporting about
derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures
to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity’s financial
position, financial performance and cash flows. It is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November
15, 2008. The Company does not believe that SFAS No. 161 will have a material
impact on its financial statements.
In
February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position SFAS 157-1, “Application
of SFAS No. 157 to SFAS No. 13 and Its Related Interpretative Accounting
Pronouncements that Address Leasing Transactions” (“FSP SFAS 157-1”) and FASB
Staff Position SFAS 157-2, “Effective Date of SFAS No. 157” (“FSP SFAS
157-2”). FSP SFAS 157-1 excludes SFAS No. 13 and its related interpretive
accounting pronouncements that address leasing transactions from the
requirements of SFAS No. 157, with the exception of fair value measurements
of
assets and liabilities recorded as a result of a lease transaction but
measured
pursuant to other pronouncements within the scope of SFAS No. 157. FSP SFAS
157-2 delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets
and
nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed
at fair
value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually).
FSP
SFAS 157-1 and FSP SFAS 157-2 became effective for the Company upon adoption
of
SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2008. The Company will provide the additional
disclosures required relating to the fair value measurement of nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities when it fully implements SFAS No. 157
on
January 1, 2009, as required, and does not believe they will have a significant
impact on its financial statements.
-
22 -
15. LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
The
Company is, from time to time, a party to litigation arising in the normal
course of its business, including various claims of patent infringement.
See the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the details of all of Bel’s pending
lawsuits. Updates to pending lawsuits since the Company’s Form 10-K filing are
described below.
The
Company is a plaintiff in a lawsuit captioned Bel Fuse Inc. and Bel Power,
Inc.
v. Andrew Ferencz, Gregory Zvonar, Bernhard Schroter, EE2GO, Inc., Howard
E.
Kaepplein and William Ng, brought in the Superior Court of the Commonwealth
of
Massachusetts. The Company was granted injunctive relief and is seeking
damages against the former stockholders of Galaxy Power, Inc., key employees
of
Galaxy and a corporation formed by some or all of the individual defendants.
The
Company has alleged that the defendants violated their written non-competition,
non-disclosure and non-solicitation agreements, diverted business and usurped
substantial business opportunities with key customers, misappropriated
confidential information and trade secrets, and harmed the Company's
business. On October 21, 2008, the court issued an order denying
Bel's motion for partial summary judgment against the defendants.
In
a
related matter, the Company is a defendant in a lawsuit captioned Robert
Chimielnski, P.C. on behalf of the stockholder representatives and the
former
stockholders of Galaxy Power, Inc. v. Bel Fuse Inc. et al. brought in the
Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This complaint for
damages and injunctive relief is based on an alleged breach of contract
and
other allegedly illegal acts in a corporate context arising out of the
Company's
objection to the release of nearly $2.0 million held in escrow under the
terms
of the stock purchase agreement between Galaxy and the Company. On October
21, 2008, the court issued an order allowing the stockholder's motion for
summary judgment. A separate and final judgment will be entered so that
the escrow deposit can be released to the stockholders. The court also
ruled
that Bel will be liable for payment of the plaintiff’s attorney fees related to
this lawsuit. The amount of these fees has not yet been determined.
The
Company cannot predict the outcome of the unresolved matters; however,
management believes that the ultimate resolution of these matters will
not have
a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial condition or
results
of operations. As of September 30, 2008, no amounts have been accrued in
connection with these lawsuits, as the amounts are not determinable.
-
23 -
16. RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
As
of
September 30, 2008, the Company has $2.0 million invested in a money market
fund
with GAMCO Investors, Inc. (“GAMCO”). GAMCO is a current shareholder of the
Company, with holdings of its Class A stock of approximately 9.4%.
17.
RESTRUCTURING
ACTIVITY
As
part
of the Company’s planning of various strategic initiatives targeted principally
at reducing costs, enhancing organizational efficiency and consolidating
and
rationalizing existing processes and facilities, the Company announced
on July
31, 2008 that it will cease manufacturing operations at its Bel Power Inc.
facility in Westborough, Massachusetts by January 2009. The costs associated
with this closure are being accounted for under SFAS No. 146 “Accounting for
Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities”. While the Company has
decided to discontinue the manufacturing of its power products at the
Westborough facility, the Company will continue its power product business
with
products manufactured primarily in Asia, and sold in all of the Company’s
regions.
The
Company expects to incur severance charges and other costs related to the
layoff
of approximately 50 associates aggregating up to $0.7 million of termination
benefit charges, $0.3 million of which was recorded during the three months
ended September 30, 2008. The Westborough facility will continue to accept
new
orders and manufacture product through December 31, 2008. The cash flows
expected to be generated from the manufacturing operations in the Westborough
facility are expected to exceed the current carrying value of the fixed
assets
at such facility. However, as the Company finalizes its plans for the transfer
of inventory and fixed assets to its other existing facilities in Asia,
it is
possible that certain of these items will not ultimately be transferred
and will
be sold locally. In the event these assets will be sold, the Company will
reevaluate those inventory items for possible impairment and will revise
the
depreciable lives on the related fixed assets accordingly. The current
carrying
amount of inventories and fixed assets at the Westborough facility at September
30, 2008 amount to $1.5 million and $1.3 million, respectively.
The
Company is still exploring various options related to its facility lease
obligation in Westborough, including sublessee opportunities as well as
the
consideration of continuing use of the office and lab space within this
facility
going forward. At September 30, 2008, the Company is obligated under its
current
lease for rent amounting to approximately $1.4 million through February
28,
2014.
A
substantial amount of the remaining costs associated with this activity
will be
recorded upon the closure of the facility which is anticipated to occur
by the
first quarter of 2009. The current period costs associated with this
restructuring activity have been included in Restructuring Charges in the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine
months
ended September 30, 2008 and impact the operating profits in the Company’s North
America reporting segment.
Activity
and liability balances related to the restructuring activity for the three
and
nine months ended September 30, 2008 are as follows:
-
24 -
Initial
restructuring accrual:
|
||||
Termination
benefit charges
|
329
|
|||
Cash
payments
|
(133
|
)
|
||
Balance,
September 30, 2008
|
$
|
196
|
The
Company has included this amount in accrued expenses in the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2008.
18. SUBSEQUENT
EVENT
During
October 2008, the Company purchased an additional 2,968,946 shares of Power-One
stock representing, to the Company’s knowledge, an additional 3.4% of
Power-One’s outstanding common stock, at a total purchase price of $14.1
million.
-
25 -
Item
1A.
Risk Factors
As
a result of protective provisions in the Company’s certificate of incorporation,
the voting power of certain officers, directors and principal shareholders
may
be increased at future meetings of the Company’s
shareholders.
An
investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Investors
should
carefully consider the risk described below, together with all other risk
factors contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
The
Company's certificate of incorporation provides that if a shareholder,
other
than shareholders subject to specific exceptions, owns 10% or more of the
outstanding Class A common stock and does not own an equal or greater percentage
of all then outstanding shares (both Class A and Class B common stock),
such
shareholder must within 90 days of the trigger date, purchase Class B common
shares, in an amount and at a price determined in accordance with a formula
described in the Company's certificate of incorporation, or forfeit its
right to
vote its Class A common shares. As of September 30, 2008, to the Company’s
knowledge, there was one shareholder of the Company's common stock with
ownership in excess of 10% of Class A outstanding shares with no ownership
of
the Company's Class B common stock and with no basis for exception from
the
operation of the above-mentioned provisions. In order to vote its shares
at
Bel's next shareholders' meeting, this shareholder must either purchase
the
required number of Class B common shares or sell or otherwise transfer
Class A
common shares until its Class A holdings are under 10%. As of September
30,
2008, to the Company's knowledge, this shareholder owned 16.9% of the Company's
Class A common stock in the aggregate and had not taken steps to either
purchase
the required number of Class B common shares or sell or otherwise transfer
Class
A common shares until its Class A holdings fall below 10%.
To
the
extent that the voting rights of particular holders of Class A common stock
are
suspended as of times when the Company's shareholders vote due to non-compliance
with the above-mentioned provisions, such suspension will have the effect
of
increasing the voting power of those holders of Class A common shares whose
voting rights are not suspended. As of September 30, 2008, Daniel
Bernstein, the Company's chief executive officer, beneficially owned 93,555
Class A common shares (or 5.1%) of the Class A common shares whose voting
rights
were not suspended, the Estate of Elliot Bernstein beneficially owned 251,132
Class A common shares (or 13.8%) of the Class A common shares whose voting
rights were not suspended and all directors and executive officers as a
group
(including Daniel Bernstein) beneficially owned 243,484 Class A common
shares
(or 13.2%) of the Class A common shares whose voting rights were not
suspended.
-
26 -
The
global financial crisis may have impacts on our business and financial
condition
that we currently cannot predict.
The
continued credit crisis and related turmoil in the global financial
system may have an impact on our business and our financial condition,
and we may face challenges if conditions in the financial markets do
not improve. Changes in economic conditions can result in reductions in
capital expenditures by end-user customers for our products, the deferral
or
delay of purchase commitments for our products and increased competition.
Continuation or worsening of the current economic conditions, a prolonged
global, national or regional economic recession or other events that could
produce major changes in demand patterns, could have a material adverse
effect
on our sales, margins and profitability. The economic situation could have
an impact on our lenders or customers, causing them to fail to meet their
obligations to us. In addition, the Company believes that several of its
vendors, particularly those located in Asia, are seeking to shorten established
credit terms or eliminate credit entirely. In the event that the current
economic conditions have a negative impact on the financial condition of
our
vendors, this may impact the availability and cost of our raw materials.
Our
ability to access the capital markets may be restricted at a time when
we would
like, or need, to raise additional financing, which could have an impact on
our flexibility to react to changing economic and business conditions.
Given the
extent of the global financial and credit crisis and the ramifications
for our
customers, vendors, lenders and competitors, we are not able to predict
the
impact the current global financial and credit crisis will have on our
operations and the industry in general going forward.
-
27 -
Item
2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
The
Company’s quarterly and annual operating results are impacted by a wide variety
of factors that could materially and adversely affect revenues and
profitability, including the risk factors described in the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. As a result of
these
and other factors, the Company may experience material fluctuations in
future
operating results on a quarterly or annual basis, which could materially
and
adversely affect its business, financial condition, operating results,
and stock
prices. Furthermore, this document and other documents filed by the Company
with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) contain certain
forward-looking statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of
1995 (“Forward-Looking Statements”) with respect to the business of the Company.
These Forward-Looking Statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties,
including those detailed in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007, which could cause actual results
to differ
materially from these Forward-Looking Statements. The Company undertakes
no
obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these
Forward-Looking Statements which may be necessary to reflect events or
circumstances after the date such statements are made or to reflect the
occurrence of unanticipated events. An investment in the Company involves
various risks, including those which are detailed from time to time in
the
Company’s SEC filings.
Overview
Bel
is a
leading producer of electronic products that help make global connectivity
a
reality. The Company designs, manufactures and markets a broad array of
magnetics, modules (including power products), circuit protection devices
and
interconnect products. While these products are deployed primarily in the
computer, networking and telecommunication industries, Bel’s expanding portfolio
of products also finds application in the automotive, medical and consumer
electronics markets. Bel's products are designed to protect, regulate,
connect,
isolate or manage a variety of electronic circuits.
The
Company’s revenues are primarily driven by the designs of its products for
customer applications and by working closely with its customers’ engineering
staffs and aligning them with industry standards committees and various
integrated circuit (IC) manufacturers.
The
Company’s sales increased by $0.6 million or 0.9% during the three months ended
September 30, 2008 as compared to the same period in 2007. The Company’s sales
increased by $10.5 million or 5.5% during the nine months ended September
30,
2008 as compared to the same period in 2007, primarily due to an increase
in
module sales of $11.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008,
as
compared to the comparable period of 2007. This increase is principally
due to
the introduction of new products. In addition, the Company’s interconnect sales
increased by $5.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008,
as
compared to the comparable period of 2007. The increase in sales for the
nine
months ended September 30, 2008 was partially offset by a decrease in the
Company’s magnetic sales of $4.2 million and in circuit protection sales of $2.1
million from the same period of 2007. The decrease in magnetic sales primarily
resulted from the production inefficiencies in the PRC referred to below,
which
inhibited the Company’s ability to increase product shipments, and together with
increased orders resulted in an increase in backlog.
-
28 -
The
Company’s expenses are driven principally by the cost of labor where Bel’s
factories are located and the cost of the materials that it uses. As labor
and
material costs vary by product line, any significant shift in product mix
has an
associated impact on the Company’s costs of sales.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company has been faced with
a
variety of factors surrounding its labor costs. Since the conclusion of
the
Lunar New Year holiday in early February, Bel has hired approximately 5,300
employees (net of turnover) in its facilities in the People’s Republic of China
(“PRC”) in order to address what was at the time a 40% increase in its magnetic
product backlog. The
addition of new workers, particularly surrounding the Lunar New Year, increased
Bel’s training costs and curtailed Bel’s output, as the new employees had lower
productivity levels until they became familiar with the Company’s methods of
production. In addition, PRC officials implemented an increase in wage
rates
effective April 1, 2008 in the areas where our products are manufactured,
including double-time rates for Saturdays and Sundays. During the second
and
third quarters of 2008, Bel’s employees worked longer hours at those premium
overtime rates in order to bring the backlog down to a more appropriate
level.
Furthermore, the U.S. dollar continued to fall in value against the PRC
yuan,
the currency in which all of Bel’s PRC factory workers and subcontractors are
paid. The combination of low efficiency of new workers, higher wage rates,
increased overtime hours worked and unfavorable currency effects resulted
in
higher total labor costs. At the end of the third quarter, the Company
implemented initiatives to reduce the number of overtime hours being worked.
This reduction in labor costs is expected to be reflected in the Company’s
results of operations in the fourth quarter of 2008.
Through
the first six months of 2008, the Company’s sales of its power products had been
steadily increasing. As the material content associated with those power
products is more expensive, material costs had been much higher during
the first
six months of 2008. In the third quarter of 2008, sales revenue in the
Company’s
power products group was $1.9 million lower than the same period of 2007,
primarily due to a decrease in sales of certain specialized components
within
the power products business. This decrease in the proportion of products
with
relatively high-cost material content, coupled with the remaining shift
in
product mix, resulted in a reduction in material costs equal to approximately
3%
of sales during the third quarter of 2008 as compared to the same period
of
2007. The reduction in material costs was offset in part by the
elevated cost of gold, copper and plastics during the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008 as compared to 2007.
On
July
31, 2008, the Company announced that it will cease manufacturing operations
at
its Bel Power Inc. facility in Westborough, Massachusetts by January 2009.
The
Company expects to incur severance charges and other costs related to the
layoff
of approximately 50 associates totaling up to $0.7 million of termination
benefit charges, as well as up to $1.7 million of non-cash asset impairment
charges. In addition, the Company is still exploring various options related
to
its facility lease obligation. In connection with this restructuring, the
Company incurred $0.3 million of termination benefit charges during the
three
months ended September 30, 2008.
-
29 -
While
the
Company’s sales increased from 2007, gross profit margins decreased from 20.5%
for the three months ended September 30, 2007 to 15.5% for the three months
ended September 30, 2008. Gross profit margins for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 were 17.4% as compared to 21.7% for the nine months
ended
September 30, 2007. Direct labor costs as a percent of sales increased
by 8.1%
during the three months ended September 30, 2008 and by 4.6% for the nine
months
ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the comparable periods of 2007,
as
discussed above. Material costs as a percent of sales decreased by 2.6%
during
the three months ended September 30, 2008 and by 0.6% during the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the same periods of 2007, thereby
offsetting a portion of the impact of rising labor costs.
Net
earnings for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 of $5.9 million include
pre-tax charges related to other-than-temporary impairments of Bel's holdings
in
Toko Inc. (TSE: 6801) of $3.6 million and the Columbia Strategic Cash Portfolio
(“Columbia Portfolio”) of $0.4 million. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources”
for further information regarding these impairment charges.
During
the quarter ended September 30, 2008, certain statute of limitations expired
which resulted in a reversal of a previously recognized liability for uncertain
tax positions in the amount of $2.3 million.
-
30 -
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
Company’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of
operations is based upon the Company’s condensed consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of
these
financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments
that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses,
and
related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going
basis,
the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to product
returns,
bad debts, inventories, intangible assets, investments, SERP expense, income
taxes and contingencies and litigation. The Company bases its estimates
on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed
to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis
for
making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that
are
not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from
these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions. For a discussion of
the
Company’s critical accounting policies, see the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for 2007.
Results
of Operations
The
following table sets forth, for the periods presented, the percentage
relationship to net sales of certain items included in the Company’s condensed
consolidated statements of operations.
Percentage of Net Sales
|
Percentage of Net Sales
|
||||||||||||
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
September 30,
|
September 30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Net
sales
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
|||||
Cost
of sales
|
84.1
|
78.8
|
82.5
|
78.4
|
|||||||||
Selling,
general and
|
|||||||||||||
administrative
expenses
|
13.3
|
13.1
|
13.6
|
14.4
|
|||||||||
Restructuring
charge
|
0.5
|
-
|
0.2
|
-
|
|||||||||
Gain
on sale of property, plant
|
|||||||||||||
and
equipment
|
-
|
0.5
|
-
|
0.6
|
|||||||||
(Impairment
charge) gain on sale of
|
|||||||||||||
investment
|
(2.1
|
)
|
-
|
(2.0
|
)
|
1.3
|
|||||||
Interest
income, net of interest
|
|||||||||||||
and
financing expense
|
0.8
|
1.7
|
1.0
|
1.5
|
|||||||||
Earnings
before provision
|
|||||||||||||
for
income taxes
|
0.7
|
10.3
|
2.8
|
10.7
|
|||||||||
Income
tax (benefit) provision
|
(2.2
|
)
|
1.4
|
(0.2
|
)
|
2.2
|
|||||||
Net
earnings
|
2.9
|
8.9
|
3.0
|
8.5
|
-
31 -
The
following table sets forth the year over year percentage increase or decrease
of
certain items included in the Company's condensed consolidated statements
of
operations.
Increase (decrease) from
|
Increase (decrease) from
|
||||||
Prior Period
|
Prior Period
|
||||||
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||
September 30, 2008
|
September 30, 2008
|
||||||
Compared with
|
Compared with
|
||||||
Three Months Ended
|
Nine Months Ended
|
||||||
September 30, 2007
|
September 30, 2007
|
||||||
Net
sales
|
0.9 | % |
5.5
|
%
|
|||
Cost
of sales
|
7.7 |
11.1
|
|||||
Selling,
general and
|
|||||||
administrative
expenses
|
3.0 |
(0.7
|
)
|
||||
Net
earnings
|
(67.1 | ) |
(63.2
|
)
|
THREE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 VERSUS THREE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
Sales
Net
sales
increased 0.9% from $66.4 million during the three months ended September
30,
2007 to $67.0 million during the three months ended September 30, 2008.
The
Company attributes the increase to an increase in module sales of $0.4
million,
an increase in interconnect sales of $0.9 million and an increase in magnetic
sales of $0.5 million, offset in part by a decrease in circuit protection
sales
of $1.2 million. The main factor driving this net sales increase during
the
third quarter related to a higher volume of products sold. The Company
implemented price increases late in the third quarter; these increases
had a
negligible impact on third quarter sales.
The
significant components of the Company's revenues for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 were magnetic products of $33.9 million (as compared
with
$33.3 million during the three months ended September 30, 2007), interconnect
products of $12.2 million (as compared with $11.4 million during the three
months ended September 30, 2007), module products of $17.0 million (as
compared
with $16.6 million during the three months ended September 30, 2007), and
circuit protection products of $3.9 million (as compared with $5.1 million
during the three months ended September 30, 2007).
Cost
of Sales
Cost
of
sales as a percentage of net sales increased from 78.8% during the three
months
ended September 30, 2007 to 84.1% during the three months ended September
30,
2008. The increase in the cost of sales percentage is primarily attributable
to
the following:
-
32 -
¨ |
The
Company experienced a significant increase in labor costs during
the three
months ended September 30, 2008 (18.0% of sales as compared to
9.9% of
sales for the three months ended September 30, 2007). This increase
was
due to a variety of factors, including higher wage rates effective
April
1, 2008 as mandated by PRC officials and an increase in overtime
hours
worked to reduce our backlog, with many of these hours being
worked on
Saturdays and Sundays at the new double-time rates. In addition,
the PRC
yuan, in which all PRC workers and subcontractors are paid, has
appreciated on average by 10.5% against the U.S. dollar during
the three
months ended September 30, 2008 from the comparable period of
2007.
|
¨ |
The
Company’s costs related to support labor and fringe benefits increased
by
1.1% of net sales during the three months ended September 30,
2008 as
compared to the same period of 2007. The Company increased its
support
staff in its Wing Ming facility during the third quarter of 2008
which,
coupled with the appreciation of the PRC yuan, resulted in higher
support
staff costs in Asia during the three months ended September 30,
2008 as
compared to the same period of 2007.
|
¨ |
As
an offsetting factor, the Company experienced a 2.6% decrease
in material
costs as a percentage of net sales in comparison with the third
quarter of
2007. This reduction in material costs was primarily due to the
shift in
product mix to a lower sales volume of certain of the Company’s power
products during the third quarter 2008. As these were value-added
products
with a higher raw material content than the Company’s other products, the
decrease in sales volume triggered a related reduction in material
costs
as a percent of sales. Bel’s suppliers have continued to pass on price
increases related to raw materials such as gold, copper and plastics.
|
Included
in cost of sales are research and development expenses of $1.9 million
and $1.8
million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
The
percentage relationship of selling, general and administrative expenses
to net
sales increased from 13.1% during the three months ended September 30,
2007 to
13.3% during the three months ended September 30, 2008. The increase in
the
dollar amount of selling, general and administrative expense for the three
months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended September
30,
2007 was approximately $0.3 million and was the result of the following
factors:
¨
|
The
Company’s legal and professional fees increased by $0.4 million from
the
third quarter of 2007, primarily due to increased legal activity
associated with the closure of Bel’s Westborough, MA facility and the
related lawsuit against former stockholders and key employees
of Galaxy,
and higher audit fees.
|
¨
|
Primarily
as a result of the strengthening of the U.S. dollar versus certain
European currencies during the three months ended September 30,
2008, the
Company’s currency exchange losses increased by $0.2 million. Payables
related to certain of the Company’s European purchases are denominated in
U.S. dollars, and receivables related to certain of the Company’s sales
are denominated in European currencies.
|
-
33 -
¨
|
The
above factors were partially offset by a $0.3 million decrease
in bad debt
expense during the three months ended September 30, 2008 as compared
to
the same period of 2007. Certain of the Company’s receivable accounts with
open balances were resolved during the third quarter of 2008
and as a
result, the bad debt reserve was reduced
accordingly.
|
Restructuring
Charge
The
Company incurred $0.3 million of termination benefit charges during the
three
months ended September 30, 2008 related to the anticipated closure of its
Westborough, MA facility. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” for further
information on the restructuring charges.
Sale
of Property, Plant and Equipment
During
the three months ended September 30, 2007, the Company realized gains from
the
sale of property, plant and equipment in Hong Kong and Macao in the amount
of
$0.3 million.
(Impairment
Charge) Gain on Sale of Investment
During
the three months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recorded additional
pre-tax other-than-temporary impairment charges of $1.3 million associated
with
its investment in Toko, Inc. and $0.1 million related to its investment
in the
Columbia Portfolio. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” for further
information.
Interest
Income
Interest
income earned on cash and cash equivalents decreased by approximately $0.6
million during the three months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to
the
comparable period in 2007. The decrease is due primarily to significantly
lower
interest rates on invested balances during the three months ended September
30,
2008 as compared to 2007.
(Benefit)
Provision for Income Taxes
The
benefit for income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2008
was $1.5
million compared to a $1.0 million provision for the three months ended
September 30, 2007. The Company's earnings before income taxes for the
three
months ended September 30, 2008 are approximately $6.4 million lower than
the
same period in 2007. The Company’s effective tax rate, the income tax (benefit)
provision as a percentage of earnings before (benefit) provision for income
taxes, was (293.1)% and 13.9% for the three months ended September 30,
2008 and
September 30, 2007, respectively. The Company’s effective tax rate will
fluctuate based on the geographic segment the pretax profits are earned
in. Of
the geographic segments in which the Company operates, the U.S. has the
highest
tax rates; Europe’s tax rates are generally lower than U.S. tax rates; and the
Far East has the lowest tax rates. The decrease is principally related
to the
tax benefits in the U.S. of $2.3 million resulting from the reversal of
an
accrual for uncertain tax positions resulting from the expiration of certain
statute of limitations and the finalization of a tax audit. This was offset
in
part by higher U.S. and European taxable income from operations as a proportion
of total pretax income during the three months ended September 30, 2008
compared
with September 30, 2007. Additionally, there were certain changes in estimates
for prior year taxes, upon finalization of 2007 tax returns.
-
34 -
NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 VERSUS NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007
Sales
Net
sales
increased 5.5% from $189.8 million during the nine months ended September
30,
2007 to $200.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
The
Company attributes the increase to an increase in module sales of $11.7
million
and an increase in interconnect sales of $5.1 million, offset in part by
a
decrease in magnetic sales of $4.2 million and a decrease in circuit protection
sales of $2.1 million. The increase in module sales includes $4.2 million
of
additional power products revenue during the nine months ended September
30,
2008 as compared with the same period in 2007. Certain of the power products
went into production at the end of the first quarter of 2007, as compared
to a
full nine months of revenue stream associated with these new products in
2008.
The increase in module sales was constrained by production inefficiencies
associated with increased demand. The partially offsetting decrease in
magnetic
sales is primarily due to a decrease in the Company’s ICM sales of $2.8 million
during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the comparable
period of 2007 as a result of production inefficiencies in the PRC referred
to
above.
The
significant components of the Company's revenues for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 were magnetic products of $90.5 million (as compared
with
$94.7 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2007), interconnect
products of $38.5 million (as compared with $33.4 million during the nine
months
ended September 30, 2007), module products of $58.9 million (as compared
with
$47.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2007), and circuit
protection products of $12.4 million (as compared with $14.5 million during
the
nine months ended September 30, 2007).
Cost
of Sales
Cost
of
sales as a percentage of net sales increased from 78.4% during the nine
months
ended September 30, 2007 to 82.5% during the nine months ended September
30,
2008. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company established
a
$1.2 million warranty accrual for a defective part, including a $0.4 million
inventory write-off of materials on hand related to this matter which were
deemed to be unusable. Excluding this anomaly, cost of sales as a percentage
of
net sales increased 4.7% during the nine months ended September 30, 2008
as
compared to the same period of 2007. The increase in the cost of sales
percentage is primarily attributable to the following:
-
35 -
¨ |
The
Company experienced a significant increase in labor costs during
the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 (14.8% of sales as compared to
10.2% of
sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2007). This increase
was due
to a variety of factors, including increased training costs and
production
inefficiencies resulting from the hiring of 5,300 net new hires
since
Lunar New Year, higher wage rates effective April 1, 2008 as
mandated by
PRC officials and an increase in overtime hours worked to reduce
our
backlog, with many of these hours being worked on Saturdays and
Sundays at
the new double-time rates. In addition, the PRC yuan, in which
all PRC
workers are paid, has appreciated on average by 9.7% during the
nine
months ended September 30, 2008 from the comparable period of
2007.
|
¨ |
As
an offsetting factor, the Company experienced a 0.6% decrease
in material
costs as a percentage of net sales as compared to the prior year.
This
reduction in material costs was primarily due to the shift in
product mix
to a lower sales volume of certain of the Company’s power products during
the third quarter 2008. As these were value-added products with
a higher
raw material content than the Company’s other products, the decrease in
sales volume triggered a related reduction in material costs
as a percent
of sales. While the Company experienced an overall decrease in
material
costs, Bel’s suppliers continued to pass on price increases related to raw
materials such as gold, copper and plastics throughout the nine
months
ended September 30, 2008.
|
Included
in cost of sales are research and development expenses of $5.6 million
and $4.9
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The
increase in research and development expenses during 2008 was primarily
related
to Bel’s power products and new integrated connector modules.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
The
percentage relationship of selling, general and administrative expenses
to net
sales decreased from 14.4% during the nine months ended September 30, 2007
to
13.6% during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease in
the
dollar amount of selling, general and administrative expense for the nine
months
ended September 30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended September 30,
2007
was approximately $0.2 million. The dollar decrease is principally attributed
to
the following:
¨
|
Legal
and professional fees decreased by $0.5 million from nine months
ended
September 30, 2007 principally due to the high level of patent
infringement activity during 2007 which did not recur in 2008.
This was
partially offset by increased activity related to the Galaxy
lawsuit
during the nine months ended September 30,
2008.
|
¨
|
Other
general and administrative costs decreased by $0.6 million during
the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the same period
of 2007.
The Company has reduced its discretionary bonus expense during
the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 as a result of lower profitability
in
2008. In addition, the Company recorded a $0.1 million reduction
of
stock-based compensation expense related to forfeitures of restricted
stock awards. There were additional reductions in other general
and
administrative costs that were not individually significant.
Offsetting
these factors in part, sales and marketing expenses increased
by $0.7
million as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007
primarily
due to increased commissions on the higher sales volume.
|
-
36 -
¨
|
Primarily
as a result of the strengthening of the U.S. dollar versus certain
European currencies during the third quarter of 2008, the Company’s
currency exchange losses increased by $0.2 million. Payables
related to
certain of the Company’s European purchases are denominated in U.S.
dollars, and receivables related to certain of the Company’s sales are
denominated in European currencies.
|
Restructuring
Charge
The
Company incurred $0.3 million of termination benefit charges during the
nine
months ended September 30, 2008 related to the anticipated closure of its
Westborough, MA facility. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” for further
information on the restructuring charges.
Gain
on Sale of Property, Plant and Equipment
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company realized gains from
the
sale of property, plant and equipment in Hong Kong and Macao in the amount
of
$1.2 million.
(Impairment
Charge) Gain on Sale of Investment
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recorded a pre-tax
other-than-temporary impairment charge of $3.6 million associated with
its
investment in Toko, Inc. The Company also recorded an other-than-temporary
impairment charge of $0.4 million related to its investment in the Columbia
Strategic Cash Portfolio during the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
See
“Liquidity and Capital Resources” for further information on these impairment
charges. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company realized
gains from the sale of Toko common stock in the amount of $2.5 million.
Interest
Income
Interest
income earned on cash and cash equivalents decreased by approximately $0.9
million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to
the
comparable period in 2007. The decrease is due primarily to significantly
lower
interest rates on invested balances during the nine months ended September
30,
2008 as compared to 2007.
(Benefit)
Provision for Income Taxes
The
benefit for income taxes for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was
$0.4
million compared to a $4.2 million provision for the nine months ended
September
30, 2007. The Company's earnings before income taxes for the nine months
ended
September 30, 2008 are approximately $14.7 million lower than the same
period in
2007. The Company’s effective tax rate, the income tax (benefit) provision as a
percentage of earnings before (benefit) provision for income taxes, was
(7.1)%
and 20.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and September 30,
2007,
respectively. The Company’s effective tax rate will fluctuate based on the
geographic segment the pretax profits are earned in. Of the geographic
segments
in which the Company operates, the U.S. has the highest tax rates; Europe’s tax
rates are generally lower than U.S. tax rates; and the Far East has the
lowest
tax rates. The decrease is principally related to the tax benefits in the
U.S.
of $2.3 million resulting from the reversal of an accrual for uncertain
tax
positions resulting from the expiration of certain statutes of limitations
and
the finalization of a tax audit. This was offset in part by higher U.S.
and
European taxable income from operations as a proportion of total pretax
income
during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared with September
30,
2007. Additionally, there were certain changes in estimates for prior year
taxes, upon finalization of 2007 tax returns. During the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, there was a gain in the U.S. from the sale of Toko
stock in
the amount of $2.5 million which increased the tax rate.
-
37 -
Inflation
and Foreign Currency Exchange
During
the past two years, the effect of inflation on the Company's profitability
was
not material. Historically, fluctuations of the U.S. Dollar against other
major
currencies have not significantly affected the Company's foreign operations
as
most sales have been denominated in U.S. Dollars or currencies directly
or
indirectly linked to the U.S. Dollar. Most significant expenses, including
raw
materials, labor and manufacturing expenses, are either incurred in U.S.
Dollars
or the currencies of the Hong Kong Dollar or the Chinese Renminbi. However,
the
Chinese Renminbi has appreciated in value significantly (approximately
9.7%)
during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the same
period
of 2007. Further appreciation of the Renminbi would result in the Company’s
incurring higher costs for all expenses incurred in the PRC. The Company's
European entities have sales transactions which are denominated principally
in
Euros and British Pounds.
Conversion of these transactions into U.S. dollars has resulted in immaterial
unrealized translation losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
and
unrealized translation gains of $0.5 million for the nine months ended
September
30, 2007, relating
to the translation of foreign subsidiary financial statements, which are
included in accumulated other comprehensive income. Realized and unrealized
net
currency transaction losses were $0.3 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and were not material for the nine months ended September
30,
2007. Any change in the linkage of the U.S. Dollar and the Hong Kong Dollar
could have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial position
or
results of operations.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Historically,
the Company has financed its capital expenditures primarily through cash
flows
from operating activities
and has
financed acquisitions both through cash flows from operating activities
and
borrowings.
Management believes that the cash flow from operations after payments of
dividends combined with its existing capital base and the Company's available
lines of credit, will be sufficient to fund its operations for at least
the next
twelve months. Such statement constitutes a Forward Looking Statement.
Factors
which could cause the Company to require additional capital include, among
other
things, a softening in the demand for the Company’s existing products, an
inability to respond to customer demand for new products, potential acquisitions
requiring substantial capital, future expansion of the Company's operations
and
net losses that would result in net cash being used in operating, investing
and/or financing activities which result in net decreases in cash and cash
equivalents. Net losses may result in the loss of domestic and foreign
credit
facilities and preclude the Company from raising debt or equity financing
in the
capital markets
on
affordable terms or otherwise.
-
38 -
On
April
30, 2008, the Company renewed its unsecured credit agreement in the amount
of
$20 million, which expires on September 10, 2011. There was no balance
outstanding as of September 30, 2008. At that date, the entire $20 million
line
of credit was available to the Company to borrow. The loan bears interest
at
LIBOR plus 0.75% to 1.25% based on certain financial statement ratios maintained
by the Company.
The
Company's Hong Kong subsidiary had an unsecured line of credit of approximately
$2 million, which was unused at September 30, 2008. The line of credit
expires
on January 31, 2009. Borrowing on the line of credit was guaranteed by
the U.S.
parent. The line of credit bears interest at a rate determined by the bank
as
the financing is extended.
For
information regarding further commitments under the Company's operating
leases,
see Note 15 of Notes to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements
in the
Company's 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
During
May 2007, the Company sold a parcel of land located in Jersey City, New
Jersey
for $6.0 million. The Company had previously estimated that approximately
$0.8
million of the proceeds would be payable to the State of New Jersey as
a portion
of the property is subject to tideland claims. In December 2007, the Tidelands
Resource Council voted to approve the Bureau of Tideland’s Management’s
recommendation for a Statement of No Interest. On March 14, 2008, the
Commissioner of the Department of Environmental Protection signed a letter
to
approve the Statement of No Interest. As final approval of the Statement
of No
Interest is still pending, the Company has continued to defer the estimated
gain
on sale of the land, in the amount of $4.6 million. Of the $6.0 million
sales
price, the Company received cash of $1.5 million before closing costs,
and $4.6
million (including interest) was being held in escrow pending final resolution
of the State of New Jersey tideland claim and certain environmental costs.
During 2007, the Company paid $0.4 million related to environmental costs,
which
approximated the maximum amount for which the Company is liable. During
May
2008, the title company released $2.3 million of the escrow and as such,
$2.3
remains in escrow and has been classified as restricted cash as of September
30,
2008. The Company anticipates resolution of this sale, release of the remaining
escrow and corresponding guarantees and recognition of the gain by the
end of
fiscal 2008. As the timing of the release of the remaining escrow of $2.3
million is not under the Company’s control, it has been classified in
non-current assets as restricted cash and the deferred gain of $4.6 million
has
been classified in deferred gain on the sale of property in the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2008.
At
September 30, 2008, the Company’s investment securities included privately
placed units of beneficial interests in the Columbia Portfolio, which is
an
enhanced cash fund sold as an alternative to money-market funds. During
the
latter half of 2007, the Company invested a portion of its cash balances
on hand
in this fund. In December 2007, due to adverse market conditions, the fund
was
overwhelmed with withdrawal requests from investors and it was closed with
a
restriction placed upon the cash redemption ability of its holders. As
a result,
the Company redesignated the Columbia Portfolio units from cash equivalents
(as
previously classified during the second and third quarters of 2007) to
short-term investments or long-term investments based upon the liquidation
schedule provided by the fund. At the time the liquidation was announced,
the
Company held 25.7 million units of the Columbia Portfolio at a book value
of
$25.7 million.
-
39 -
As
of
September 30, 2008, the Company has received total cash redemptions to
date of
$16.7 million (including $14.4 million in the nine months ended September
30,
2008) at a weighted-average net asset value of $.9785 per unit. As the
net asset
value continues to decline, the Company has been recording impairment charges
on
this investment. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,
the
Company recorded $0.1 million and $0.4 million in impairment charges,
respectively. As such, the additional realized gains and losses recorded
at the
time of the redemptions were minimal. As of September 30, 2008, the Company
holds 8.6 million units at a book value of $8.2 million. Subsequent to
September
30, 2008, the net asset value associated with the Columbia Portfolio continued
to decline and as of October 31, 2008, the Company recorded additional
unrealized losses of $0.3 million related to this investment. Information
and
the markets relating to these investments remain dynamic, and there may
be
further declines in the value of these investments, the value of the collateral
held by these entities, and the liquidity of the Company’s investments. To the
extent that the Company determines that there is a further decline in fair
value, the Company may recognize additional impairment charges in future
periods
up to the aggregate amount of these investments.
As
of
September 30, 2008, the Company owned a total of 1,840,919 shares, or
approximately 1.9%,
of the
outstanding shares,
of the
common stock of Toko. The Company’s original cost of these shares was $5.6
million ($3.07 per share). Toko develops, manufactures and sells power
supply
related components and radio frequency related components primarily in
Japan.
Toko had a market capitalization of approximately $107.3 million as of
September
30, 2008. These shares are reflected on the Company’s condensed consolidated
balance sheets as marketable securities. These marketable securities are
considered to be available for sale under SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities”. In accordance with FASB Staff
Position (“FSP”) 115-1, the Company periodically reviews its marketable
securities and determines whether the investments are other-than-temporarily
impaired. During the second quarter of 2008, the Company deemed this investment
to be other-than-temporarily impaired and recorded a pre-tax impairment
charge
of $2.4 million to write this investment to its fair value at June 30,
2008
($1.79 per share). The Company deemed this investment to be
other-than-temporarily impaired as of September 30, 2008 and has recorded
a
pre-tax impairment charge of $1.3 million during the third quarter of 2008
to
write down this investment to its fair value at September 30, 2008 ($1.10
per
share). The Company reviewed various factors in making its determination,
including volatility of the Toko share price since June 30, 2008, Toko’s recent
financial results and the Company’s intention and ability to hold the
investment. The Toko share price has declined from $1.79 per share at June
30,
2008 to $1.10 per share at September 30, 2008. While the Company has the
intent
and ability to hold this investment until it is in a gain position, there
is no
indication that the Toko stock price will rise above the Company’s adjusted cost
basis within the foreseeable future.
-
40 -
On
February 25, 2008, the Company announced that it had acquired 4,370,052
shares
of Power-One, Inc. (“Power-One”) common stock representing, to the Company’s
knowledge, 5% of Power-One’s outstanding common stock, at a total purchase price
of $10.1 million ($2.32 per share). Power-One’s common stock is quoted on the
NASDAQ Global Market. Power-One is a designer and manufacturer of power
conversion and power management products. As of September 30, 2008, the
Company
has recorded an unrealized loss, net of income tax, of approximately $2.4
million which is included in accumulated other comprehensive loss in
stockholders’ equity. The Company reviewed various factors in determining
whether an other-than-temporary impairment exists on its investment in
Power-One
at September 30, 2008. These factors included volatility of the Power-One
share
price, Power-One’s recent financial results and recent changes made to its
executive management, as well as the Company’s intention and ability to hold the
investment. The Power-One share price has been extremely volatile since
the
Company’s purchase of this stock, ranging from $1.23 - $3.70, with an average
closing price of $2.46 during the ownership period. The Company has the
ability
and intent to hold this investment until the market improves. In addition,
during early October, the Company purchased an additional 2,968,946 shares
of
Power-One stock representing, to the Company’s knowledge, an additional 3.4% of
Power-One’s outstanding common stock, at a total purchase price of $14.1
million. Based on all factors reviewed, the Company does not believe that
the
investment in Power-One is other-than-temporarily impaired as of September
30,
2008.
During
June 2008, the Company invested $2.4 million in certificates of deposit
(CDs)
with Stephens, Inc., with whom the Company has an investment banking
relationship. During October 2008, the Company invested an additional $2.5
million in CDs with Stephens, Inc. These investments are part of the Certificate
of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) program whereby the funds are
allocated to various banks in order to achieve FDIC insurance on the full
invested amount. The CDs have an initial maturity of 26-weeks and an early
redemption feature with a 30-day interest penalty.
During
2000, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the purchase of
up to ten
percent of the Company’s outstanding common shares. As of September 30, 2008,
the Company had purchased and retired 23,600 Class B common shares at a
cost of
approximately $0.8 million and had purchased and retired 510,925 Class
A common
shares at a cost of approximately $16.5 million. No shares of Class B common
stock were repurchased during the nine months ended September 30, 2008
and
350,892 shares of Class A common stock were repurchased during the nine
months
ended September 30, 2008 at a cost of $10.8 million. Of such shares, 325,396
shares were repurchased during the three months ended September 30,
2008.
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company's cash and cash
equivalents decreased by $1.1 million, reflecting approximately $13.1 million
provided by operating activities (principally as a result of net income
of $5.9
million, depreciation and amortization expense of $5.4 million, stock-based
compensation expense of $1.1 million and impairment charges of $4.0 million,
offset in part by a $3.0 million decrease in operating assets and liabilities),
$14.4 million from the partial redemption of the Columbia Portfolio and
$2.3
million from the partial release of escrow related to the sale of the Jersey
City property, offset, in part, by $12.5 million used for purchases of
marketable securities, $5.3 million for the purchase of property, plant
and
equipment, $10.8 million for the repurchase of the Company’s common stock and
$2.4 million for payments of dividends.
Cash
and
cash equivalents, marketable securities, short-term investments and accounts
receivable comprised approximately 50.8% and 54.4%
of the
Company's total assets at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively. The Company's current ratio (i.e., the ratio of current assets
to
current liabilities) was 5.3 to 1 and 6.2 to 1 at September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively.
-
41 -
During
the current worldwide financial downturn, the Company believes that several
of
its vendors, particularly those located in Asia, are seeking to shorten
established credit terms or eliminate credit entirely.
As
part
of the Company’s planning of various strategic initiatives targeted principally
at reducing costs, enhancing organizational efficiency and consolidating
and
rationalizing existing processes and facilities, the Company announced
on July
31, 2008 that it will cease manufacturing operations at its Bel Power Inc.
facility in Westborough, Massachusetts by January 2009. The costs associated
with this closure are being accounted for under SFAS No. 146 “Accounting for
Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities”. While the Company has
decided to discontinue the manufacturing of its power products at the
Westborough facility, the Company will continue its power product business
with
products manufactured primarily in Asia, and sold in all of the Company’s
regions.
The
Company expects to incur severance charges and other costs related to the
layoff
of approximately 50 associates aggregating up to $0.7 million of termination
benefit charges, $0.3 million of which was recorded during the three months
ended September 30, 2008. The Westborough facility will continue to accept
new
orders and manufacture product through December 31, 2008. The cash flows
expected to be generated from the manufacturing operations in the Westborough
facility are expected to exceed the current carrying value of the fixed
assets
at such facility. However, as the Company finalizes its plans for the transfer
of inventory and fixed assets to its other existing facilities in Asia,
it is
possible that certain of these items will not ultimately be transferred
and will
be sold locally. In the event these assets will be sold, the Company will
reevaluate those inventory items for possible impairment and will revise
the
depreciable lives on the related fixed assets accordingly. The current
carrying
amount of inventories and fixed assets at the Westborough facility at September
30, 2008 amount to $1.5 million and $1.3 million, respectively.
The
Company is still exploring various options related to its facility lease
obligation in Westborough, including sublessee opportunities as well as
the
consideration of continuing use of the office and lab space within this
facility
going forward. At September 30, 2008, the Company is obligated under its
current
lease for rent amounting to approximately $1.4 million through February
28,
2014.
A
substantial amount of the remaining costs associated with this activity
will be
recorded upon the closure of the facility which is anticipated to occur
by the
first quarter of 2009. The current period costs associated with this
restructuring activity have been included in Restructuring Charges in the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine
months
ended September 30, 2008 and impact the operating profits in the Company’s North
America reporting segment.
New
Financial Accounting Standards
In
May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles” (“SFAS No. 162”). SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of
accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to
be used
in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities
that are
presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)
in
the United States. This Statement is effective sixty days following the
SEC’s
approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to
AU
Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles.” The Company is currently evaluating the
potential impact, if any, of the adoption of SFAS No. 162 on its financial
statements.
-
42 -
In
March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities”, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“SFAS No.
161”). The new standard is intended to improve financial reporting about
derivative instruments and hedging activities by requiring enhanced disclosures
to enable investors to better understand their effects on an entity’s financial
position, financial performance and cash flows. It is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November
15, 2008. The Company does not believe that SFAS No. 161 will have a material
impact on its financial statements.
In
February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position SFAS 157-1, “Application
of SFAS No. 157 to SFAS No. 13 and Its Related Interpretative Accounting
Pronouncements that Address Leasing Transactions” (“FSP SFAS 157-1”) and FASB
Staff Position SFAS 157-2, “Effective Date of SFAS No. 157” (“FSP SFAS
157-2”). FSP SFAS 157-1 excludes SFAS No. 13 and its related interpretive
accounting pronouncements that address leasing transactions from the
requirements of SFAS No. 157, with the exception of fair value measurements
of
assets and liabilities recorded as a result of a lease transaction but
measured
pursuant to other pronouncements within the scope of SFAS No. 157. FSP SFAS
157-2 delays the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all nonfinancial assets
and
nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed
at fair
value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually).
FSP
SFAS 157-1 and FSP SFAS 157-2 became effective for the Company upon adoption
of
SFAS No. 157 on January 1, 2008. The Company will provide the additional
disclosures required relating to the fair value measurement of nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities when it fully implements SFAS No. 157
on
January 1, 2009, as required, and does not believe they will have a significant
impact on its financial statements.
-
43 -
Item
3.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments — The estimated fair values of financial
instruments have been determined by the Company using available market
information and appropriate valuation methodologies.
The
Company has not entered into, and does not expect to enter into, financial
instruments for trading or hedging purposes. The Company does not currently
anticipate entering into interest rate swaps and/or similar
instruments.
The
Company's carrying values of cash, marketable securities, accounts receivable,
accounts payable and accrued expenses are a reasonable approximation of
their
fair value. At
September 30, 2008, two of the Company’s investments – the Company’s investment
in Toko stock and the Company’s investment in the Columbia Strategic Cash
Portfolio (the “Columbia Portfolio”) - have been subject to recent market
declines, triggering impairment charges recorded during the nine months
ended
September 30, 2008.
The
per
share fair market value of the remaining 1.8 million shares of Toko stock
has
decreased by 38.5% since June 30, 2008 to $1.10 at September 30, 2008 (a
decline
of $0.69 per share). This investment has been in a loss position since
April
2007. The Company deemed this investment other-than-temporarily impaired
as of
June 30, 2008 and recorded an impairment charge of $2.4 million during
the
second quarter of 2008. This adjusted the Company’s cost basis in its investment
in Toko down to its then current fair value of $1.79 per share. While the
Company has the intent and ability to hold this investment until it is
in a gain
position, there is no indication that the Toko stock price will rise above
the
Company’s adjusted basis within the foreseeable future. As a result, the Company
has deemed this investment to be further impaired as of September 30, 2008
and
has recorded an additional impairment charge of $1.3 million during the
third
quarter of 2008. If Toko experiences further declines in its stock price,
this
could cause the Company to take additional impairment charges on this investment
in the future.
The
Company’s investment in the Columbia Portfolio has also been sensitive to the
recent market decline. In December 2007, the Company was notified that
its $25.7
million investment in the Columbia Portfolio was being liquidated and that
the
fund was converting from a fixed net asset value (“NAV”) to a floating NAV,
which resulted in the Company’s recording a $0.3 million impairment charge
during the year ended December 31, 2007 and additional impairment charges
of
$0.4 million were recorded in the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
See Note
3 of the Notes to the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. As
of September 30, 2008, the Company has a total of $8.2 million invested
in the
Columbia Portfolio. If the NAV were to decline by $0.10 per unit (10% of
the NAV
of $0.9572 at September 30, 2008), the net impact to the Company’s results of
operations and cash flows would be a decrease of income before provision
for
income taxes and cash flows from operating activities of approximately
$0.8
million.
-
44 -
In
addition to the two investments discussed above, the Company’s investment in
Power-One, Inc. has also been subject to recent market declines. As of
September
30, 2008, the pre-tax unrealized loss associated with this investment is
$3.8
million. If the per share fair market value of the Power-One stock were
to
decrease by $0.15 per share (10% of the September 30, 2008 Power-One stock
price), this would result in an additional unrealized loss of $0.6 million.
The
Company’s cost in this investment was $2.32 per share and from the time of
purchase in late February 2008 through the end of the third quarter, the
closing
stock price ranged from $1.23 - $3.70 per share, with the average closing
stock
price for the period at $2.79 per share. The Company has the intent and
ability
to hold this stock for the period of time it takes for the market to recover.
As
a result of these factors, management believes that the investment in Power-One
is not other-than-temporarily impaired as of September 30, 2008.
The
Company enters into transactions denominated in U.S. Dollars, Hong Kong
Dollars,
the Chinese Renminbi, Euros, British Pounds and the Czech Koruna. Fluctuations
in the U.S. dollar exchange rate against these currencies could significantly
impact the Company's consolidated results of operations.
The
Company believes that a change in interest rates of 1% or 2% would not
have a
material effect on the Company's condensed consolidated statement of operations
or balance sheet.
-
45 -
Item
4.
Controls
and Procedures
a)
|
Disclosure
controls and procedures.
As of the end of the Company’s most recently completed fiscal quarter
covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation,
with the
participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s chief
executive officer and vice president of finance, of the effectiveness
of
the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Securities
Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s chief
executive officer and vice president of finance concluded that
the
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring
that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the
reports
that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is
recorded,
processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified
in
the SEC’s rules and forms.
|
b.)
|
Changes
in internal controls over financial reporting:
There have been no changes in the Company's internal controls
over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company's last fiscal
quarter
to which this report relates that have materially affected, or
are
reasonable likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting.
|
PART
II.
Other Information
Item
1. Legal
Proceedings
The
Company is, from time to time, a party to litigation arising in the normal
course of its business, including various claims of patent infringement.
See the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the details of all of Bel’s pending
lawsuits. Updates to pending lawsuits since the Company’s Form 10-K filing are
described below.
The
Company is a plaintiff in a lawsuit captioned Bel Fuse Inc. and Bel Power,
Inc.
v. Andrew Ferencz, Gregory Zvonar, Bernhard Schroter, EE2GO, Inc., Howard
E.
Kaepplein and William Ng, brought in the Superior Court of the Commonwealth
of
Massachusetts. The Company was granted injunctive relief and is seeking
damages against the former stockholders of Galaxy Power, Inc., key employees
of
Galaxy and a corporation formed by some or all of the individual defendants.
The
Company has alleged that the defendants violated their written non-competition,
non-disclosure and non-solicitation agreements, diverted business and usurped
substantial business opportunities with key customers, misappropriated
confidential information and trade secrets, and harmed the Company's
business. On October 21, 2008, the court issued an order denying
Bel's motion for partial summary judgment against the defendants.
In
a
related matter, the Company is a defendant in a lawsuit captioned Robert
Chimielnski, P.C. on behalf of the stockholder representatives and the
former
stockholders of Galaxy Power, Inc. v. Bel Fuse Inc. et al. brought in the
Superior Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. This complaint for
damages and injunctive relief is based on an alleged breach of contract
and
other allegedly illegal acts in a corporate context arising out of the
Company's
objection to the release of nearly $2.0 million held in escrow under the
terms
of the stock purchase agreement between Galaxy and the Company. On October
21, 2008, the court issued an order allowing the stockholder's motion for
summary judgment. A separate and final judgment will be entered so that
the escrow deposit can be released to the stockholders. The court also
ruled
that Bel will be liable for payment of the plaintiff’s attorney fees related to
this lawsuit. The amount of these fees has not yet been determined.
-
46 -
The
Company cannot predict the outcome of the unresolved matters; however,
management believes that the ultimate resolution of these matters will
not have
a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial condition or
results
of operations. As of September 30, 2008, no amounts have been accrued in
connection with these lawsuits, as the amounts are not determinable.
Item
2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The
following table sets forth certain information regarding the Company's
purchase
of shares of its Class A Common Stock during each calendar month in the
quarter
ended September 30, 2008:
Period
|
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
|
Average
Price Paid
per Share
|
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs
|
Maximum Number
of Shares that May
Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plan
|
|||||||||
July
1 - July 31, 2008
|
5,820
|
$
|
26.99
|
5,820
|
973,648
|
||||||||
August
1 - August 31, 2008
|
318,618
|
30.88
|
318,618
|
622,974
|
|||||||||
September
1 - September 30, 2008
|
958
|
25.96
|
958
|
621,720
|
|||||||||
Total
|
325,396
|
$
|
30.79
|
325,396
|
621,720
|
As
of
September 30, 2008, the Company had cumulatively purchased and retired
23,600
shares of the Company’s Class B Common Stock. No shares of Class B common stock
were repurchased during the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
-
47 -
Item
6.
Exhibits
(a)
Exhibits:
31.1
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of the Vice President of Finance pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes -
Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
32.2
|
Certification
of the Vice-President of Finance pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
-
48 -
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
BEL FUSE INC. | |
By:
|
/s/Daniel
Bernstein
|
Daniel Bernstein, President and | |
Chief Executive Officer | |
By:
|
/s/
Colin Dunn
|
Colin Dunn, Vice President of Finance |
Dated:
November 7, 2008
-
49 -
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Exhibit
31.1 - Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section
302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit
31.2 - Certification of the Vice President of Finance pursuant to Section
302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit
32.1 - Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section
906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit
32.2 - Certification of the Vice President of Finance pursuant to Section
906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
-
50 -