BELDEN INC. - Annual Report: 2011 (Form 10-K)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

or

Commission File No. 001-12561

BELDEN INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

7733 Forsyth Boulevard

Suite 800 St. Louis, Missouri 63105

(Address of Principal Executive Offices and Zip Code)

(314) 854-8000

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.     Yes  þ        No  ¨.

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨        No  þ.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  þ        No  ¨.

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every interactive data file required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  þ        No  ¨.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  þ        Accelerated filer  ¨        Non-accelerated filer  ¨        Smaller reporting company  ¨

                                                                          (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).     Yes  ¨        No  þ.

At July 3, 2011, the aggregate market value of Common Stock of Belden Inc. held by non-affiliates was $1,494,248,969 based on the closing price ($36.51) of such stock on such date.

There were 45,966,481 shares of registrant’s Common Stock outstanding on February 21, 2012.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

The registrant intends to file a definitive proxy statement for its annual meeting of stockholders within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Proxy Statement”). Portions of such proxy statement are incorporated by reference into Part III.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1.    Business

General

Belden Inc. (Belden) designs, manufactures, and markets cable, connectivity, and networking products in markets including industrial, enterprise, broadcast, and consumer electronics. We focus on market segments that require highly differentiated, high-performance products. We add value through design, engineering, manufacturing excellence, product quality, and customer service.

Belden is a Delaware corporation incorporated in 1988. We report in three segments: the Americas segment, the Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA) segment, and the Asia Pacific segment. Financial information about our operating segments appears in Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In 2011, Belden acquired ICM Corp. (ICM), Poliron Cabos Electricos Especiais Ltda (Poliron) and Byres Security, Inc. (Byres Security). For more information regarding these transactions, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In 2010, Belden acquired GarrettCom, Inc. (GarrettCom) and the Communications Products business of Thomas & Betts. Belden acquired Trapeze Networks, Inc. (Trapeze) in July 2008 and sold it in December 2010. For more information regarding these transactions, see Notes 3 and 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

As used herein, unless an operating segment is identified or the context otherwise requires, “Belden,” the “Company”, and “we” refer to Belden Inc. and its subsidiaries as a whole.

Products and Markets

Belden produces and sells a portfolio of cable, connectivity, and networking products into a variety of end markets, including industrial, enterprise, broadcast, and consumer electronics. Our products provide for the transmission of signals for data, sound, and video applications.

The main categories of cable products are (1) copper cables, including shielded and unshielded twisted pair cables, coaxial cables, and stranded cables, (2) fiber optic cables, which transmit light signals through glass or plastic fibers, and (3) composite cables, which are combinations of multiconductor, coaxial, and fiber optic cables jacketed together or otherwise joined together to serve complex applications and provide ease of installation. Connectivity products include both fiber and copper connectors for the enterprise, broadcast, and industrial markets. Connectors are also sold as part of end-to-end structured cabling solutions. Networking products include Industrial Ethernet switches and related equipment and security features, fiber optic interfaces and media converters used to bridge fieldbus networks over long distances, and load-moment indicators for mobile cranes and other load-bearing equipment.

For the industrial end market, we supply cable, connectivity, and networking products for applications ranging from advanced industrial networking and robotics to traditional instrumentation and control systems. Our cable products are used in discrete manufacturing and process operations involving the connection of computers, programmable controllers, robots, operator interfaces, motor drives, sensors, printers, and other devices. Many industrial environments, such as petrochemical and other harsh-environment operations, require cables with exterior armor or jacketing that can endure physical abuse and exposure to chemicals, extreme temperatures, and outside elements. Other applications require conductors, insulating, and jacketing materials that can withstand repeated flexing. In addition to cable product configurations for these applications, we supply heat-shrinkable tubing and wire management products to protect and organize wire and cable assemblies. We sell our industrial products primarily through value-added resellers, industrial distributors, and original equipment

1

Table of Contents

manufacturers (OEMs). We design, manufacture, and market Industrial Ethernet switches and related equipment, both rail-mounted and rack-mounted, for factory automation, power generation and distribution, process automation, and large-scale infrastructure projects such as bridges, wind farms, and airport runways. Rail-mounted switches are designed to withstand harsh conditions including electronic interference and mechanical stresses. We also design, manufacture, and market fiber optic interfaces and media converters used to bridge fieldbus networks over long distances. In addition, we design, manufacture, and market a broad range of industrial connectors for sensors and actuators, cord-sets, distribution boxes, and fieldbus communications. These products are used both as components of manufacturing equipment and in the installation and networking of such equipment. We also design, manufacture, and market load-moment indicators. Our switches, communications equipment, connectors, and load-moment indicators are sold directly to industrial equipment OEMs and through a network of distributors and system integrators.

For the enterprise end market, we supply structured cabling solutions, connectors, and networking products for the electronic and optical transmission of data, sound, and video over local- and wide- area networks. Products for this market include high-performance copper cables including 10-gigabit Ethernet technologies, fiber optic cables, connectors, wiring racks, panels, interconnecting hardware, intelligent patching devices, and cable management solutions for complete end-to-end network structured wiring systems. End-use customers are hospitals, financial institutions, governments, service providers, and data centers. Our systems are installed through a network of highly trained system integrators and are supplied through authorized distributors.

For the broadcast end market, we manufacture a variety of multiconductor and coaxial cable and connector products, which distribute audio and video signals for use in broadcast television including digital television and high definition television, broadcast radio, pre- and post-production facilities, recording studios, and public facilities such as casinos, arenas, and stadiums. Our audio/video cables are also used in connection with microphones, musical instruments, audio mixing consoles, effects equipment, speakers, paging systems, and consumer audio products. Our primary market channels for these broadcast, music, and entertainment products are broadcast specialty distributors and audio systems installers. We also sell directly to music OEMs and the major television networks including ABC, CBS, Fox, and NBC. We also provide specialized cables for security applications such as video surveillance systems, airport baggage screening, building access control, motion detection, public address systems, and advanced fire alarm systems. These products are sold primarily through distributors and also directly to specialty system integrators. We manufacture flexible, copper-clad coaxial cable and associated connector products for the high-speed transmission of data, sound, and video (broadband) that are used for the “drop” section of cable television (CATV) systems and satellite direct broadcast systems. These cables are sold primarily through distributors.

For the consumer electronics end market, we provide appliance wiring materials for the internal wiring of a wide range of electronic devices; coaxial and miniature coaxial cable for internal wiring in electronic game consoles, laptop computers, mobile telephones, personal digital assistant devices, and global positioning systems; high-temperature resistant wire for heating mats and electronic ignitions; highly flexible and temperature resistant automotive wire; flexible cords; and miscellaneous audio and video cable. These products are sold principally under our LTK brand within China to international and Chinese OEMs and contract manufacturers.

Segments

The Americas segment contributed approximately 61%, 57%, and 57% of our consolidated revenues in 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively. This segment sells the full array of our products for the industrial, enterprise, and broadcast markets.

The EMEA segment contributed approximately 21%, 23%, and 25% of our consolidated revenues in 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively. This segment sells the full array of our products for the industrial, enterprise, and broadcast markets.

The Asia Pacific segment contributed approximately 18%, 20%, and 18% of our consolidated revenues in 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively. This segment sells the full array of our products for the industrial, enterprise, broadcast, and consumer electronics markets.

2

Table of Contents

Customers

We sell to distributors, end-users, installers, and directly to OEMs. Sales to the distributor Anixter International Inc. represented approximately 16% of our consolidated revenues in 2011.

We have supply agreements with distributors and with OEM customers in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, and Asia. In general, our customers are not contractually obligated to buy our products exclusively, in minimum amounts, or for a significant period of time. The loss of one or more large customers or distributors could result in lower total revenues and profits. However, we believe that our relationships with our customers and distributors are satisfactory and that they choose Belden products, among other reasons, due to our reputation, the breadth of our product offering, the quality and performance characteristics of our products, and our service and technical support.

There are potential risks in our relationships with distributors. Changes in the inventory levels of our products held by our distributors can result in significant variability in our revenues. Adjustments to inventory levels may be accelerated through consolidation among distributors. In addition, if the costs of materials used in our products fall and competitive conditions make it necessary for us to reduce our list prices, we may be required, according to the terms of contracts with certain of our distributors, to reimburse them for a portion of the price they paid for our products in their inventory. Further, certain distributors are allowed to return certain inventory in exchange for an order of equal or greater value. We have recorded reserves for the estimated impact of these inventory policies.

International Operations

In addition to manufacturing facilities in the United States, we have manufacturing facilities in Canada, China, Mexico, and Brazil, as well as various countries in Europe. During 2011, approximately 54% of Belden’s sales were to customers outside the United States. Our primary channels to international markets include both distributors and direct sales to end users and OEMs.

The effect of changes in the relative value of currencies impacts our results of operations. However, our revenues and costs are typically in the same currency, reducing our overall currency risk.

A risk associated with our European manufacturing operations is the higher relative expense and length of time required to reduce manufacturing employment. In addition, some of our foreign operations are subject to economic and political risks inherent in maintaining operations abroad, such as economic and political destabilization, international conflicts, restrictive actions by foreign governments, and adverse foreign tax laws.

Financial information for Belden by geographic area is shown in Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Competition

We face substantial competition in our major markets. The number and size of our competitors vary depending on the product line and operating segment. Some multinational competitors have greater financial, engineering, manufacturing, and marketing resources than we have. There are also many regional competitors that have more limited product offerings.

For each of our operating segments, the market can be generally categorized as highly competitive with many players. The market can be influenced by economic downturns as some competitors that are highly leveraged both financially and operationally could become more aggressive in their pricing of products.

The principal competitive factors in all our product markets are product features, availability, price, customer support, and distribution coverage. The relative importance of each of these factors varies depending on the customer. Some products are manufactured to meet published industry specifications and are less

3

Table of Contents

differentiated on the basis of product characteristics. We believe that Belden stands out in many of its markets on the basis of our reputation, the breadth of our product offering, the quality and performance characteristics of our products, and our service and technical support.

Although we believe that we have certain technological and other advantages over our competitors, realizing and maintaining such advantages requires continued investment in engineering, research and development, capital equipment, marketing, and customer service and support. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in maintaining such advantages.

Research and Development

We engage in continuing research and development programs, including new and existing product development, testing and analysis, and process and equipment development and testing. See the Consolidated Statements of Operations for amounts incurred for research and development.

Patents and Trademarks

We have a policy of seeking patents when appropriate on inventions concerning new products, product improvements, and advances in equipment and processes as part of our ongoing research, development, and manufacturing activities. We own many patents and registered trademarks worldwide that are used by our operating segments, with pending applications for numerous others. Although in the aggregate our patents are of considerable importance to the manufacturing and marketing of many of our products, we do not consider any single patent to be material to the business as a whole. We consider the following trademarks to be of material value to our business: Belden^®, Alpha™, Mohawk^®, West Penn Wire/CDT^®, Hirschmann^®, Lumberg Automation™, LTK™, Telecast™, Snap-N-Seal^®, GarrettCom^®, Poliron™, Byres Security™, and Tofino^®.

Raw Materials

The principal raw material used in many of our products is copper. Other materials we purchase in large quantities include fluorinated ethylene-propylene (both Teflon^® and other FEP), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyethylene, aluminum-clad steel and copper-clad steel conductors, other metals, optical fiber, printed circuit boards, and electronic components. With respect to all major raw materials used by us, we generally have either alternative sources of supply or access to alternative materials. Supplies of these materials are generally adequate and are expected to remain so for the foreseeable future.

Over the past three years, the prices of metals, particularly copper, have been highly volatile. During 2009, copper prices rose as the price at the end of 2009 was approximately 140% greater than the price at the end of 2008. During 2010, copper prices continued to increase with the price at the end of 2010 approximately 33% greater than at the beginning of the year. During 2011, copper prices decreased with the price at the end of 2011 approximately 23% less than at the beginning of the year. Prices for materials such as PVC and other plastics derived from petrochemical feedstocks have also fluctuated. Since Belden utilizes the first in, first out (FIFO) inventory costing methodology, the impact of copper and other raw material cost changes on our cost of goods sold is delayed by approximately two months based on our inventory turns.

While we seek to be neutral in our pricing for fluctuations in commodity prices, we can experience short-term favorable or unfavorable variances. When the cost of raw materials increases, we are generally able to recover these costs through higher pricing of our finished products. The majority of our products are sold through distribution, and we manage the pricing of these products through published price lists, which we update from time to time, with new prices typically taking effect a few weeks after they are announced. Some OEM customer contracts have provisions for passing through raw material cost changes, generally with a lag of a few weeks to three months.

4

Table of Contents

Backlog

Our business is characterized generally by short-term order and shipment schedules. Our backlog consists of product orders for which we have received a customer purchase order or purchase commitment and which have not yet been shipped. Orders are subject to cancellation or rescheduling by the customer, generally with a cancellation charge. At December 31, 2011, our backlog of orders believed to be firm was $145.8 million compared with $134.0 million at December 31, 2010. The majority of the backlog at December 31, 2011 is scheduled to be shipped in 2012.

Environmental Matters

We are subject to numerous federal, state, provincial, local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the storage, handling, emission, and discharge of materials into the environment, including the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, the Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act, and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. We believe that our existing environmental control procedures and accrued liabilities are adequate, and we have no current plans for substantial capital expenditures in this area.

We do not currently anticipate any material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, cash flow, or competitive position as a result of compliance with federal, state, provincial, local or foreign environmental laws or regulations, including clean-up costs. However, some risk of environmental liability and other costs is inherent in the nature of our business, and there can be no assurance that material environmental costs will not arise. Moreover, it is possible that future developments, such as increasingly strict requirements of environmental laws and enforcement policies thereunder, could lead to material costs of environmental compliance and clean-up.

Employees

As of December 31, 2011, we had approximately 6,800 employees worldwide. We also utilized about 700 workers under contract manufacturing arrangements. Approximately 900 employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements at various locations around the world. We believe our relationship with our employees is generally good.

Importance of New Products and Product Improvements;

Impact of Technological Change; Impact of Acquisitions

Many of the markets we serve are characterized by advances in information processing and communications capabilities, including advances driven by the expansion of digital technology, which require increased transmission speeds and greater bandwidth. Our markets are also subject to increasing requirements for mobility and information security. The relative costs and merits of copper and fiber optic cable solutions could change in the future as various competing technologies address the market opportunities. We believe that our future success will depend in part upon our ability to enhance existing products and to develop and manufacture new products that meet or anticipate such changes.

Fiber optic technology presents a potential substitute for certain of the copper-based products that comprise the majority of our sales. Fiber optic cables have certain advantages over copper-based cables in applications where large amounts of information must travel great distances and where high levels of information security are required. While the cost to interface electronic and light signals and to terminate and connect optical fiber remains high, we expect that in future years the cost will diminish. We produce and market fiber optic cables and many customers specify these products in combination with copper cables.

The final stage of most networks remains almost exclusively copper-based and we expect that it will continue to be copper for some time. However, if a significant decrease in the cost of fiber optic systems relative

5

Table of Contents

to the cost of copper-based systems were to occur, such systems could become superior on a price/performance basis to copper systems. We do not control our own source of optical fiber production and, although we cable optical fiber, we could be at a cost disadvantage to competitors who both produce and cable optical fiber.

The installation of wireless devices has required the development of new types of wired infrastructure systems. In the future, we expect that wireless communications technology will be an increasingly viable alternative technology to both copper- and fiber optic-based systems for certain applications. We believe that problems associated with current wireless technology systems will gradually be overcome, such as insufficient signal security, susceptibility to interference and jamming, installation difficulties, and relatively slow transmission speeds, making the use of wireless technology more acceptable in many markets, including not only office networks but also industrial and broadcast installations.

In the industrial automation market, there is a growing trend toward adoption of Industrial Ethernet technology, bringing to the factory floor the advantages of digital communication and the ability to network devices made by different manufacturers and then link them to enterprise systems. Adoption of this technology is at a more advanced stage among European manufacturers than those in the United States and Asia, but we believe that the trend will globalize.

Our strategy includes continued acquisitions to support our signal transmission solutions strategy. There can be no assurance that future acquisitions will occur or that those that do occur will be successful.

Available Information

We file annual, quarterly, and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). These reports, proxy statements, and other information contain additional information about us. You may read and copy these materials at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for more information about the operation of the Public Reference Room. The SEC also maintains a web site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information about issuers who file electronically with the SEC. The Internet address of the site is http://www.sec.gov.

Belden maintains an Internet web site at www.belden.com where our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports are available without charge, as soon as reasonably practicable following the time they are filed with or furnished to the SEC.

We will provide upon written request and without charge a printed copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K. To obtain such a copy, please write to the Corporate Secretary, Belden Inc., 7733 Forsyth Boulevard, Suite 800, St. Louis, MO 63105.

6

Table of Contents

Executive Officers

The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the persons who were Belden executive officers as of February 25, 2012. All executive officers are elected to terms that expire at the organizational meeting of the Board of Directors following the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

John S. Stroup was appointed President, Chief Executive Officer and member of the Board in October 2005. From 2000 to the date of his appointment with the Company, he was employed by Danaher Corporation, a manufacturer of professional instrumentation, industrial technologies, and tools and components. At Danaher, he initially served as Vice President, Business Development. He was promoted to President of a division of Danaher’s Motion Group and later to Group Executive of the Motion Group. Earlier, he was Vice President of Marketing and General Manager with Scientific Technologies Inc. He has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Northwestern University and an M.B.A. from the University of California at Berkeley Haas School of Business.

Gray G. Benoist served as Senior Vice President, Finance, and Chief Financial Officer from August 2006 to December 2011. He also served as Chief Accounting Officer from November 2009 to July 2011. Mr. Benoist resigned as Chief Financial Officer at the end of 2011 in anticipation of his retirement scheduled to occur in March 2012. Mr. Benoist was previously Senior Vice President, Director of Finance of the Networks Segment of Motorola Inc., a $6.3 billion business unit responsible for the global design, manufacturing, and distribution of wireless and wired telecom system solutions. During more than 25 years with Motorola, Mr. Benoist served in senior financial and general management roles across Motorola’s portfolio of businesses, including the Personal Communications Sector, Integrated and Electronic Systems Sector, Multimedia Group, Wireless Data Group, and Cellular Infrastructure Group. He has a B.S. in Finance & Accounting from Southern Illinois University and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago.

Steven Biegacki was appointed Vice President, Global Sales and Marketing (title changed as reflected in the above table in February 2009) in March 2008. Mr. Biegacki was previously Vice President, Marketing for Rockwell Automation. At Rockwell, he initially served as DeviceNet Program Manager, was promoted to Business Manager, Automation Networks in 1997, Vice President, Integrated Architecture Commercial Marketing in 1999, and Vice President, Components and Power Control Commercial Marketing in 2005. Previously, he was an Automation Systems Architecture Marketing Manager for Allen-Bradley Company. He has a B.S. in Electrical Engineering Technology from ETI Technical College in Cleveland, Ohio.

7

Table of Contents

Kevin L. Bloomfield has been Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of the Company (title changed as reflected in the above table in February 2009) since July 2004. From August 1993 until July 2004, Mr. Bloomfield was Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of Belden 1993 Inc. He was Senior Counsel for Cooper Industries from February 1987 to July 1993, and had been in Cooper’s Law Department from 1981 to 1993. He has a B.A. in Economics and a J.D. from the University of Cincinnati and an M.B.A. from The Ohio State University.

Henk Derksen has been Senior Vice President, Finance, and Chief Financial Officer since January 2012. Prior to that, he served as Vice President, Corporate Finance from July 2011 to December 2011 and Treasurer and Vice President, Financial Planning and Analysis of the Company from January 2010 to July 2011. In August of 2003, he became Vice President, Finance for the Company’s EMEA division, after joining the Company at the end of 2000. He was Vice President and Controller of Plukon Poultry, a food processing company from 1998 to 2000, and has 5 years experience in public accounting with Price Waterhouse and Baker Tilly. Mr. Derksen has a M.A. in Accounting from the University of Arnhem in the Netherlands and holds a doctoral degree in Business Economics in addition to an Executive Master of Finance & Control from Tias Business School in the Netherlands.

Christoph Gusenleitner joined Belden in April 2010 as Executive Vice President, EMEA Operations and Global Connectivity Products. Prior to coming to Belden, Mr. Gusenleitner was a partner at Bain & Company in its industrial goods and services practice in Munich. Prior to that, he was General Manager of KaVo Dental GmbH and Kaltenbach & Voigt GmbH in Biberach, Germany. KaVo is an affiliate of Danaher Corporation. During his four-year tenure at KaVo, Mr. Gusenleitner led the strategic planning process for the global Danaher Dental Equipment platform and led three business units and 18 sales subsidiaries in EMEA. He has a degree in electrical engineering from the University of Technology in Vienna, Austria and a Master of Science in Industrial Automation from Carnegie Mellon University.

Naresh Kumra joined Belden in March 2006 as Vice President of Business Development, and was named Executive Vice President, Asia Pacific Operations (title changed as reflected in the above table in February 2009) in June 2006. From 1999 to 2006, he worked for McKinsey & Company, Inc., a global management consulting firm. From 1991 to 1997, he worked for industrial and electronics businesses of Schlumberger Industries in New Delhi, India, and Poitiers, France. He graduated from the Indian Institute of Technology in Delhi with a B.S. in Computer Science and has an M.B.A. from the Darden School at the University of Virginia.

John S. Norman joined Belden in May 2005 as Controller, was named Chief Accounting Officer in November 2005, and was named Vice President of Belden in February 2009. In January 2010, he became Vice President, Finance for the Company’s EMEA division. In July 2011, he became Vice President, Controller, and Chief Accounting Officer. He was vice president and controller of Graphic Packaging International Corporation, a paperboard packaging manufacturing company, from 1999 to 2003, and has 17 years experience in public accounting with PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP. Mr. Norman has a B.S. in Accounting from the University of Missouri and is a Certified Public Accountant.

Cathy Odom Staples served as Vice President, Human Resources of the Company (title changed as reflected in the above table in February 2009) from July 2004 to February 2012, and held the same position with Belden 1993 Inc. from May 1997 through July 2004. Ms. Staples resigned from this position upon the appointment of her successor in February 2012 and in anticipation of her retirement scheduled to occur in March 2012. She was Vice President, Human Resources for Belden Electronics from May 1992 to May 1997. Ms. Staples has a B.S.B.A. in Human Resources from Drake University.

Denis Suggs joined Belden in June 2007 as Vice President, Americas Operations (title changed as reflected in the above table in February 2009). Prior to joining Belden, he held various senior executive positions at Danaher Corporation, most recently as the President, Portescap and serving as the Chairman of the Board – Portescap International, Portescap Switzerland, Danaher Motion India Private Ltd., and Airpax Company. Mr. Suggs holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from North Carolina State University and an M.B.A. from Duke University.

8

Table of Contents

Nancy Wolfe joined Belden in February 2012 as Senior Vice President, Human Resources. Prior to joining Belden, Ms. Wolfe held various human resources, benefits and finance roles at Monsanto Company, where she was employed from 1997 to February 2012. Most recently, she was the Human Resources Lead for Monsanto’s Global Vegetable Seeds Division. Ms. Wolfe holds dual B.S. degrees in Finance and Business Administration and has an M.B.A. from Washington University in St. Louis.

Item 1A.    Risk Factors

We make forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in other materials we file with the SEC or otherwise release to the public, and on our website. In addition, our senior management might make forward-looking statements orally to analysts, investors, the media, and others. Statements concerning our future operations, prospects, strategies, financial condition, future economic performance (including growth and earnings) and demand for our products and services, and other statements of our plans, beliefs, or expectations, including the statements contained in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” that are not historical facts, are forward-looking statements. In some cases these statements are identifiable through the use of words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “project,” “target,” “can,” “could,” “may,” “should,” “will,” “would,” and similar expressions. The forward-looking statements we make are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to various assumptions, risks, and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested by these forward-looking statements. These factors include, among others, those set forth below and in the other documents that we file with the SEC.

We expressly disclaim any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. Following is a discussion of some of the more significant risks that could materially impact our business.

Our strategic plan includes further acquisitions.

Our strategic plan includes further acquisitions, and the extent to which appropriate acquisitions are made and integrated can affect our overall growth, operating results, financial condition, and cash flows. Our business strategy involves continued acquisitions to support our growth, product portfolio, and business plans. Our ability to acquire businesses successfully may decline if we are unable to identify appropriate acquisition targets consistent with our strategic plan, the competition among potential buyers increases, or the cost of acquiring suitable businesses becomes too expensive. As a result, we may be unable to make acquisitions or be forced to pay more or agree to less advantageous acquisition terms for the companies that we are able to acquire. Our ability to implement our business strategy and grow our business, particularly through acquisitions, may depend on our ability to raise capital by selling equity or debt securities or obtaining additional debt financing. Market conditions may prevent us from obtaining financing when we need it or on terms acceptable to us.

We may have difficulty integrating the operations of acquired businesses, which could negatively affect our results of operations and profitability.

We may have difficulty integrating acquired businesses and future acquisitions might not meet our performance expectations. Some of the integration challenges we might face include differences in corporate culture and management styles, additional or conflicting governmental regulations, preparation of the acquired operations for compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, financial reporting that is not in compliance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, disparate company policies and practices, customer relationship issues, and retention of key personnel. In addition, management may be required to devote a considerable amount of time to the integration process, which could decrease the amount of time we have to manage the other businesses. We may not be able to integrate operations successfully or cost-effectively, which could have a negative effect on our results of operations or our profitability. The process of integrating operations could also cause some interruption of, or the loss of momentum in, the activities of acquired businesses.

9

Table of Contents

If we are unable to retain senior management and key employees, our business operations could be adversely affected.

Our success has been largely dependent on the skills, experience, and efforts of our senior management and key employees. The loss of any of our senior management or other key employees, including due to acquisitions or restructuring activities, could have an adverse effect on us. We may not be able to find qualified replacements for these individuals and the integration of potential replacements may be disruptive to our business. More broadly, a key determinant of our success is our ability to attract, develop and retain talented associates. While this is one of our strategic priorities, we may not be able to succeed in this regard.

A challenging global economic environment or a downturn in the markets we serve could adversely affect our operating results and stock price in a material manner.

A challenging global economic environment could cause substantial reductions in our revenue and results of operations as a result of weaker demand by the end users of our products and, for some products, price erosion. Such price erosion may occur through competitors becoming more aggressive in their pricing practices, which could adversely impact our gross margins. A challenging global economy could also make it difficult for our customers, our vendors, and us to accurately forecast and plan future business activities. Our customers could also face issues gaining timely access to sufficient credit, which could have an adverse effect on our results if such events cause delays in collection or write-offs of receivables. Further, the demand for many of our products is economically sensitive and will vary with general economic activity, trends in nonresidential construction, investment in manufacturing facilities and automation, demand for information technology equipment, and other economic factors.

We face risks regarding our European operations. Economic uncertainty, such as the uncertainty arising from various European sovereign debt crises or general economic conditions, could result in a significant decline in the value of the Euro relative to the U.S. dollar, which could result in a significant adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations; could make it extremely difficult for our customers and us to accurately forecast and plan future business activities; and could cause our customers to slow spending on our products and services, which could delay and lengthen sales cycles.

The global cable, connectivity, and networking industries are highly competitive.

We face competition from other manufacturers for each of our product platforms and in each of our geographic regions. These companies compete on price, reputation and quality, product technology and characteristics, and terms. Some multinational competitors have greater engineering, financial, manufacturing, and marketing resources than we have. Actions that may be taken by competitors, including pricing, business alliances, new product introductions, market penetration, and other actions, could have a negative effect on our revenue and profitability. Moreover, during economic downturns, some competitors that are highly leveraged both financially and operationally could become more aggressive in their pricing of products.

We may be unable to achieve our strategic priorities in emerging markets.

Emerging markets are a significant focus of our strategic plan, and our presence in emerging markets expanded on April 1, 2011 with our acquisition of Poliron in Brazil. The developing nature of these markets presents a number of risks. We may be unable to attract, develop, and retain appropriate talent to manage our businesses in emerging markets. Deterioration of social, political, labor, or economic conditions in a specific country or region may adversely affect our operations or financial results. Among the risks in emerging market countries are bureaucratic intrusions and delays, contract compliance failures, fluctuating currencies and interest rates, limitations on the amount and nature of investments, restrictions on permissible forms and structures of investment, unreliable legal and financial infrastructure, regime disruption and political unrest, uncontrolled inflation and commodity prices, fierce local competition with better political connections, and corruption. In addition, the costs of compliance with local laws and regulations in emerging markets may negatively impact our competitive position as compared to locally owned manufacturers.

10

Table of Contents

Legal compliance issues could adversely affect our business.

We have a strong legal compliance and ethics program, including a code of business conduct and ethics, policies on anti-bribery, export controls and other legal compliance areas, and periodic training to relevant associates on these matters. While we believe that this program should reduce the likelihood of a legal compliance violation, such a violation could still occur, disrupting our business through fines, penalties, diversion of internal resources, and negative publicity.

We may be unable to implement our strategic plan successfully.

Our strategic plan is designed to improve revenues and profitability, reduce costs, and improve working capital management. To achieve these goals, our strategic priorities are to continue deployment of our Market Delivery System (MDS) so as to capture market share through end-user engagement, channel management, outbound marketing, and vertical strategy; improve our recruitment and development of talented associates; develop strong global connector and industrial networking product platforms; acquire businesses that fit our strategic plan; and become a leading Lean company. Lean refers to a business management system that strives to create value for customers and deliver that value to the right place, at the right time, and in the right quantities while reducing or eliminating waste from all processes. We have a disciplined process for deploying this strategic plan through our associates. There is a risk that we may not be successful in executing these measures to achieve the expected results for a variety of reasons, including market developments, economic conditions, shortcomings in establishing appropriate action plans, or challenges with executing multiple initiatives simultaneously. For example, our MDS initiative may not succeed or we may lose market share due to challenges in choosing the right products to market or the right customers for these products, integrating products of acquired companies into our sales and marketing strategy, or strategically bidding against OEM partners. We may not be able to acquire businesses that fit our strategic plan on acceptable business terms, and we may not achieve our other strategic priorities.

Our future success depends in part on our ability to develop and introduce new products.

Our markets are characterized by the introduction of products with increasing technological capabilities, including fiber optic and wireless signal transmission solutions that compete with the copper cable solutions that comprise the majority of our revenue. The relative costs and merits of copper cable solutions, fiber optic cable solutions, and wireless solutions could change in the future as various competing technologies address the market opportunities. We believe that our future success will depend in part upon our ability to enhance existing products and to develop and manufacture new products that meet or anticipate such changes, which will require continued investment in engineering, research and development, capital equipment, marketing, and customer service and support. We have long been successful in introducing successive generations of more capable products, but if we were to fail to keep pace with technology or with the products of competitors, we might lose market share and harm our reputation and position as a technology leader in our markets. Competing technologies could cause the obsolescence of many of our products. See the discussion above in Part I, Item 1, under Importance of New Products and Product Improvements; Impact of Technological Change; Impact of Acquisitions.

We rely on several key distributors in marketing our products.

The majority of our sales are through distributors. These distributors carry the products of competitors along with our products. Our largest distributor, Anixter International Inc., accounted for 16% of our revenue in 2011. If we were to lose a key distributor, our revenue and profits would likely be reduced, at least temporarily.

In the past, we have seen some distributors acquired and consolidated. If there were further consolidation of the electronics and cable distributors, this could affect our relationships with these distributors. It could also result in consolidation of distributor inventory, which would temporarily depress our revenue. In addition, changes in the inventory levels of our products held by our distributors can result in significant variability in our

11

Table of Contents

revenues. We have also experienced financial failure of distributors from time to time, resulting in our inability to collect accounts receivable in full. A global economic downturn could cause financial difficulties (including bankruptcy) for our customers, which would adversely affect our results of operations.

Changes in the price and availability of raw materials we use could be detrimental to our profitability.

Copper is a significant component of the cost of most of our products. Over the past few years, the prices of metals, particularly copper, have been highly volatile. Copper rose rapidly in price for much of this period and remains a volatile commodity. Prices of other materials we use, such as polyvinylchloride (PVC) and other plastics derived from petrochemical feedstocks, have also been volatile. Generally, we have recovered much of the higher cost of raw materials through higher pricing of our finished products. The majority of our products are sold through distribution, and we manage the pricing of these products through published price lists which we update from time to time, with new prices typically taking effect a few weeks after they are announced. Some OEM contracts have provisions for passing through raw material cost changes, generally with a lag of a few weeks to three months. If we are unable to raise prices sufficiently to recover our material costs, our earnings will be reduced. If we raise our prices but competitors raise their prices less, we may lose sales, and our earnings will be reduced. If the price of copper were to decline, we may be compelled to reduce prices to remain competitive, which could have a negative effect on revenue, and we may be required, according to the terms of contracts with certain of our distributors, to reimburse them for a portion of the price they paid for our products in their inventory. While we generally believe the supply of raw materials (copper, plastics, and other materials) is adequate, we have experienced instances of limited supply of certain raw materials, resulting in extended lead times and higher prices. If a supply interruption or shortage of materials were to occur, this could have a negative effect on revenue and earnings.

We may experience significant variability in our quarterly and annual effective tax rate which would affect our reported net income.

We have a complex tax profile due to the global nature of our operations, which encompass multiple taxing jurisdictions. Variability in the mix and profitability of domestic and international activities, identification and resolution of various tax uncertainties, changes in tax laws and rates, and the extent to which we are able to realize net operating loss and other carryforwards included in deferred tax assets and avoid potential adverse outcomes included in deferred tax liabilities, among other matters, may significantly affect our effective income tax rate in the future.

Our effective income tax rate is the result of the income tax rates in the various countries in which we do business. Our mix of income and losses in these jurisdictions affects our effective tax rate. For example, relatively more income in higher tax rate jurisdictions or relatively more losses in lower tax rate jurisdictions would increase our effective tax rate and thus lower our net income. Similarly, if we generate losses in tax jurisdictions for which no benefits are available, our effective income tax rate will increase. Our effective income tax rate may also be impacted by the recognition of discrete income tax items, such as, for instance, required adjustments to our liabilities for uncertain tax positions or our deferred tax asset valuation allowance. A significant increase in our effective income tax rate could have a material adverse impact on our earnings.

Volatility of credit markets could adversely affect our business.

Uncertainty in U.S. and global financial and equity markets could make it more expensive for us to conduct our operations and may cause us to be unable to pursue or complete acquisitions.

Because we do business in many countries, our results of operations are affected by changes in currency exchange rates and are subject to political, economic, and other uncertainties.

More than half of our sales are outside the United States. Other than the U.S. dollar, the principal currencies to which we are exposed through our manufacturing operations, sales, and related cash holdings are the euro, the Canadian dollar, the Hong Kong dollar, the Chinese yuan, the Mexican peso, the Australian dollar, the British

12

Table of Contents

pound, and the Brazilian real. In most cases, we have revenues and costs in the same currency, thereby reducing our overall currency risk, although the realignment of our manufacturing capacity among our global facilities may alter this balance. When the U.S. dollar strengthens against other currencies, the results of our non-U.S. operations are translated at a lower exchange rate and thus into lower reported earnings.

In addition to manufacturing facilities in the United States, we have manufacturing facilities in Canada, China, Mexico, Brazil, and several European countries. We rely on suppliers in many countries, including China. Our foreign operations are subject to economic and political risks inherent in maintaining operations abroad such as economic and political destabilization, land use risks, international conflicts, restrictive actions by foreign governments, and adverse foreign tax laws. A risk associated with our European manufacturing operations is the higher relative expense and length of time required to adjust manufacturing employment capacity.

Potential problems with our information systems could interfere with our business and operations.

We rely on our information systems and those of third parties for processing customer orders, shipping of products, billing our customers, tracking inventory, supporting accounting functions and financial statement preparation, paying our employees, and otherwise running our business. Any disruption in our information systems or those of the third parties upon whom we rely could have a significant impact on our business. In addition, we may need to enhance our information systems to provide additional capabilities and functionality. The implementation of new information systems and enhancements is frequently disruptive to the underlying business of an enterprise. Any disruptions affecting our ability to accurately report our financial performance on a timely basis could adversely affect our business in a number of respects. If we are unable to successfully implement potential future information systems enhancements, our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows could be negatively impacted.

If our goodwill or other intangible assets become impaired, we may be required to recognize charges that would reduce our income.

Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, goodwill and certain other intangible assets are not amortized but must be reviewed for possible impairment annually or more often in certain circumstances if events indicate that the asset values are not recoverable. We have incurred significant charges for the impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets in the past, and we may be required to do so again in future periods if the underlying value of our business declines. Such a charge would reduce our income without any change to our underlying cash flow.

We might have difficulty protecting our intellectual property from use by competitors, or competitors might accuse us of violating their intellectual property rights.

Disagreements about patents and other intellectual property rights occur in the markets we serve. Third parties have asserted and may in the future assert claims of infringement of intellectual property rights against us or against our customers or channel partners for which we may be liable. Furthermore, a successful claimant could secure a judgment that requires us to pay substantial damages or prevents us from distributing certain products or performing certain services.

Some of our employees are members of collective bargaining groups, and we might be subject to labor actions that would interrupt our business.

Some of our employees, primarily outside the United States, are members of collective bargaining units. We believe that our relations with employees are generally good. However, if there were a dispute with one of these bargaining units, the affected operations could be interrupted resulting in lost revenues, lost profit contribution, and customer dissatisfaction.

13

Table of Contents

We are subject to current environmental and other laws and regulations, including the risks associated with possible climate change legislation.

We are subject to the environmental laws and regulations in each jurisdiction where we do business. We are currently and may in the future be held responsible for remedial investigations and clean-up costs of certain sites damaged by the discharge of hazardous substances, including sites that have never been owned or operated by us but at which we have been identified as a potentially responsible party under federal and state environmental laws. Changes in environmental and other laws and regulations in both domestic and foreign jurisdictions and changes in enforcement policies thereunder could adversely affect our operations due to increased costs of compliance and potential liability for noncompliance.

Greenhouse gas emissions have increasingly become the subject of a large amount of attention. Legislation related to climate change has been introduced in the U.S. Congress. In addition, future regulation of greenhouse gas could occur pursuant to future U.S. treaty obligations or statutory or regulatory changes under existing environmental laws. While not all are likely to become law, additional climate change regulation may adversely affect our costs by increasing energy costs and raw material prices and requiring equipment modification or replacement.

This list of risk factors is not exhaustive. Other considerations besides those mentioned above might cause our actual results to differ from expectations expressed in any forward-looking statement.

Item 1B.     Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2.    Properties

Belden has a corporate office that it leases in St. Louis, Missouri, and various manufacturing facilities, warehouses, and sales and administration offices throughout the world. The significant facilities as of December 31, 2011, were as follows.

Used by the Americas operating segment:

Used by the EMEA operating segment:

14

Table of Contents

Used by the Asia Pacific operating segment:

The total size of all Americas, EMEA, and Asia Pacific operating segment locations is 3.5 million square feet, 1.2 million square feet, and 1.8 million square feet, respectively. We believe our physical facilities are suitable for their present and intended purposes and adequate for our current level of operations.

Item 3.    Legal Proceedings

We are a party to various legal proceedings and administrative actions that are incidental to our operations. These proceedings include personal injury cases, 112 of which are pending as of February 1, 2012, in which we are one of many defendants. Electricians have filed a majority of these cases, primarily in Pennsylvania and Illinois, generally seeking compensatory, special, and punitive damages. Typically in these cases, the claimant alleges injury from alleged exposure to a heat-resistant asbestos fiber. Our alleged predecessors had a small number of products that contained the fiber, but ceased production of such products more than 20 years ago. Through February 1, 2012, we have been dismissed, or reached agreement to be dismissed, in more than 400 similar cases without any going to trial, and with only a small number of these involving any payment to the claimant. In our opinion, the proceedings and actions in which we are involved should not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, operating results, or cash flows. However, since the trends and outcome of this litigation are inherently uncertain, we cannot give absolute assurance regarding the future resolution of such litigation, or that such litigation may not become material in the future.

PART II

Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “BDC.”

As of February 21, 2012, there were 474 record holders of common stock of Belden Inc.

We paid a dividend of $0.05 per share in each quarter of 2011 and 2010. We anticipate that comparable cash dividends will continue to be paid quarterly in the foreseeable future.

15

Table of Contents

Common Stock Prices and Dividends

Set forth below is information regarding our stock repurchases for the three months ended December 31, 2011.

16

Table of Contents

Stock Performance Graph

The following graph compares the cumulative total shareholder return on Belden’s common stock over the five-year period ended December 31, 2011, with the cumulative total return during such period of the Standard and Poor’s 500 Stock Index and the Dow Jones Electronic & Electrical Equipment Index. The comparison assumes $100 was invested on December 31, 2006, in Belden’s common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends. The stock performance shown on the graph below represents historical stock performance and is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

Comparison of Cumulative Five Year Total Return(1)

Total Return To Shareholders

(Includes reinvestment of dividends)

17

Table of Contents

Item 6.    Selected Financial Data

In 2011, we acquired ICM, Poliron, and Byres Security. The results of operations of these entities are included in our operating results from their respective acquisition dates. During 2011, we recognized severance expense of $5.0 million and asset impairment charges of $2.5 million.

In 2010, we acquired GarrettCom and the Communications Products business of Thomas & Betts during our fiscal fourth quarter. The results of operations of these entities are included in our operating results from their respective acquisition dates. During 2010, we recognized expenses from the effects of purchase accounting of $6.5 million, severance expense of $1.1 million, and asset impairment charges of $16.6 million.

In 2009, we streamlined our manufacturing, sales and administrative functions worldwide in an effort to reduce costs and mitigate the weakening demand experienced throughout the global economy. During 2009, we recognized severance and employee relocation expenses of $29.6 million, asset impairment charges of $27.8 million, loss on sale of assets of $17.2 million, adjusted depreciation expense of $2.6 million, and other charges related to our global restructuring actions of $24.1 million.

In 2008, we recognized goodwill and other asset impairment charges of $443.7 million, severance expense of $39.9 million, loss on sale of assets of $3.7 million, and other charges related to our various restructuring actions of $4.9 million.

In 2007, we acquired Hirschmann Automation and Control GmbH (Hirschmann), LTK Wiring Co. Ltd. (LTK), and Lumberg Automation Components (Lumberg Automation) during our fiscal second quarter. The results of operations of these entities are included in our operating results from their respective acquisition dates. During 2007, we recognized expenses from the effects of purchase accounting of $15.8 million and severance expense of $4.2 million, asset impairment charges of $3.3 million, and adjusted depreciation expense of $0.2 million related to our various restructuring actions. We also recognized an $8.6 million gain on sales of assets.

18

Table of Contents

Item 7.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

We design and manufacture a portfolio of cable, connectivity, and networking products, which we market through regional business segments to industrial, enterprise, broadcast, and consumer electronics markets. We strive to create shareholder value by:

We believe our proven business systems, expanded portfolio of connectivity and networking products, exposure to high-growth vertical end-markets, and our expanding position within emerging market geographies present a unique value proposition that increases shareholder value.

To accomplish these goals, we use a set of tools and processes that are designed to continuously improve business performance in the critical areas of quality, delivery, cost, and innovation. We consider revenue growth, operating margin, cash flows, return on invested capital, and working capital management metrics to be our key operating performance indicators. We also seek to acquire businesses that we believe can help us achieve these objectives. The extent to which appropriate acquisitions are made and integrated can affect our overall growth, operating results, financial condition, and cash flows.

We generated approximately 54% of our sales outside of the United States in 2011. As a global business, our operations are affected by worldwide, regional, and industry economic and political factors. We continue to operate in a highly competitive business environment in our served markets and geographies. Our market and geographic diversity limits the impact of any one market or the economy of any single country on our consolidated operating results. Our individual businesses monitor key competitors and customers, including to the extent possible their sales, to gauge relative performance and the outlook for the future. In addition, we use indices concerning general economic trends to predict our outlook for the future given the broad range of products manufactured and end markets served.

We generated year-over-year revenue increases in each quarter during 2011 due to our acquisitions completed in 2010 and 2011 as well as growth in many of our end markets. As a result, consolidated revenues for 2011 increased 23% over 2010.

Although we use the United States dollar as our reporting currency, a substantial portion of our assets, liabilities, operating results, and cash flows reside in or are derived from countries other than the United States. These assets, liabilities, operating results, and cash flows are translated from local currencies into the United States dollar using exchange rates effective during the respective period. We have generally accepted the exposure to currency exchange rate movements without using derivative financial instruments to manage this risk. Both positive and negative movements in currency exchange rates against the United States dollar will continue to affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, operating results, and cash flows in our Consolidated Financial Statements.

19

Table of Contents

Significant Trends and Events in 2011

The following trends and events during 2011 have had varying effects on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Acquisitions

We completed three acquisitions during 2011. We acquired ICM for cash of $21.8 million on January 7, 2011. ICM is a broadcast connectivity product manufacturer located in Denver, Colorado. ICM’s strong brands and technology enhance our portfolio of broadcast products. We acquired Poliron for cash of $28.7 million on April 1, 2011. Poliron is an industrial cable manufacturer located in Sao Paulo, Brazil, and the acquisition of Poliron expands our presence in emerging markets. We acquired Byres Security for cash of $7.2 million on August 31, 2011. Byres Security is an industrial network security company located in Vancouver, Canada. The acquisition of Byres expands our networking product capabilities.

The results of operations of ICM, Poliron, and Byres Secuirty have been included in our results of operations from their respective acquisition dates. Both ICM and Poliron are reported within the Americas segment, and Byres Security is reported within the EMEA segment.

Commodity prices

Our operating results can be affected by changes in prices of commodities, primarily copper, silver, and compounds, which are components in some of the products we sell. Generally, as the costs of inventory purchases increase due to higher commodity prices, we raise selling prices to customers to cover the increase in costs, resulting in higher sales revenue but a lower gross profit percentage. Conversely, a decrease in commodity prices would result in lower sales revenue but a higher gross profit percentage. Selling prices of our products are affected by many factors, including end market demand, capacity utilization, overall economic conditions, and commodity prices. Importantly, however, there is no exact measure of the effect of changing commodity prices, as there are thousands of transactions in any given quarter, each of which has various factors involved in the individual pricing decisions. Therefore, all references to the effect of copper prices or other commodity prices are estimates.

Results of Operations

Consolidated Continuing Operations

20

Table of Contents

2011 Compared to 2010

Revenues increased in 2011 compared to 2010 for the following reasons:

Gross profit increased in 2011 compared to 2010 due to the increases in revenues as discussed above. Gross profit also increased due to improved product group mix, which reflects more revenues from our relatively higher gross profit margin networking and connectivity products as compared to cable products. Our acquisitions completed in 2010 and 2011 contributed to the increase in gross profit for the year. In addition, gross profit increased due to decreases in severance and other restructuring costs of $9.0 million from 2010 to 2011.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased in 2011 compared to 2010. The increases are primarily due to investments in our strategic initiatives, including our Market Delivery System and Talent Management. The increases are also due to our acquisitions completed in 2010 and 2011. The year- over-year percentage increases in selling, general and administrative expenses were less than the percentage increases in revenues due to the benefits of the successful execution of our Lean Enterprise strategies.

The increases in research and development costs in 2011 compared to 2010 are primarily due to our recent acquisitions. The increases in costs are also due in part to increases in new product development costs, primarily for networking products.

Operating income increased in 2011 compared to 2010 due to the increases in revenues and gross profit and the other factors discussed above. In addition, operating income increased due to the benefits of our completed global restructuring actions, the successful execution of our regional manufacturing and Lean enterprise strategies, and our recent acquisitions. Operating income also increased due to a decrease in asset impairment charges of $14.0 million from 2010 to 2011.

Income from continuing operations before taxes increased in 2011 compared to 2010 due to the increases in operating income discussed above and decreases in interest expense. Interest expense in 2010 included a $2.9 million loss on derivative and hedging activity. There were no losses on derivative and hedging activities in 2011. These increases in income for 2011 were partially offset by decreases in other income. In 2010, we recognized $1.5 million of other income due to an escrow settlement related to a prior acquisition. There was no other income in 2011.

We recognized income tax expense of $24.6 million in 2011. Our effective tax rate for 2011 was 17.6% compared to 15.5% in 2010. This change is primarily attributable to the jurisdictional mix of income from continuing operations before taxes. In addition, income tax expense for 2011 reflects a net $8.0 million benefit due to the reduction of deferred tax asset valuation allowances primarily in foreign jurisdictions and a $1.3 million benefit due to the reduction of our reserve for uncertain tax positions, primarily due to the settlement of a foreign tax audit. Income tax expense for 2010 included a $1.9 million benefit due to the settlement of a foreign tax audit.

21

Table of Contents

2010 Compared to 2009

Revenues increased in 2010 compared to 2009 primarily for the following reasons:

The remaining increase in revenue was due to favorable currency translation.

Gross profit increased in 2010 compared to 2009 due to the increase in revenue as discussed above and decreases in severance and other restructuring costs. In 2009, cost of sales included $37.8 million of severance and other restructuring costs related primarily to global restructuring actions to streamline our manufacturing functions worldwide in an effort to reduce costs and mitigate the weakening demand experienced in 2009 throughout the global economy. Other restructuring costs include equipment transfer costs, contract termination costs, employee relocation costs, and other restructuring related charges. In 2010, cost of sales included $12.0 million of such severance and other restructuring costs.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased in 2010 compared to 2009. This increase was primarily due to investments in our strategic initiatives, including our Market Delivery System and Talent Management, as demand in our end markets improved.

The increase in research and development costs in 2010 compared to 2009 was primarily due to higher payroll costs associated with the employees engaged in our research and development activities.

Operating income increased in 2010 compared to 2009 due to the increases in revenues and gross profit and the other factors discussed above. In addition, operating income increased due to a decrease in asset impairment charges of $11.2 million. Also, operating income in 2009 was negatively impacted by a loss on the sale of a German cable business of $17.2 million. We did not recognize any losses on sales of assets in 2010.

Income from continuing operations increased in 2010 compared to 2009 primarily related to the substantial improvement in operating income offset minimally by higher interest expense associated with a full year of interest on our senior subordinated notes issued in June 2009 and the results of our interest hedging activities. In addition, in 2009 we recognized $1.5 million of other expense for fees paid related to an amendment of our senior secured credit facility. We did not recognize any other expense in 2010.

Our annual effective tax rate was 15.5% in 2010 compared to -19.3% in 2009. While we recorded a tax expense on a pre-tax loss in 2009 primarily due to an increase in the valuation allowances recorded against deferred tax assets established with respect to net operating loss carryforwards, we recorded a tax expense on pre-tax income at a 15.5% rate in 2010 due primarily to the lower income tax rates on income earned in foreign jurisdictions.

Americas Segment

22

Table of Contents

Americas total revenues, which include affiliate revenues, increased in 2011 compared to 2010. Acquisitions contributed $123.5 million to the increase in revenues. Higher unit sales volume, as well as pricing changes related to non-copper commodity cost increases and other pricing changes resulted in an increase in revenues of $106.2 million. Higher selling prices due to increases in copper costs contributed an estimated $44 million to the increase in revenues. The increase in revenues was also due to favorable currency translation of $7.3 million resulting primarily from the Canadian dollar strengthening against the U.S. dollar. The increases in revenues were partially offset by changes in affiliate sales, which resulted in decreases in revenues of $6.5 million.

Operating income increased in 2011 compared to 2010 primarily due to the increases in revenues discussed above. In addition, operating income increased due to improved product group mix, which reflects more revenues from our relatively higher gross profit margin networking and connectivity product platforms as compared to cable products, as well as the results of our lean enterprise initiatives. Operating income also increased due to reductions in severance and other restructuring costs and asset impairment charges of $14.9 million.

Americas total revenues increased $88.8 million in 2010 over 2009 due to increased market share and higher unit sales volume as demand in the segment’s North American markets recovered from their weakness during 2009. An increase in copper prices resulted in higher selling prices that contributed an estimated $44 million to the increase in revenues. The remaining increase in revenues was the result of favorable currency translation as the Canadian dollar strengthened against the U.S. dollar and from the full year inclusion of our 2009 acquisition.

Operating income increased in 2010 over 2009 primarily due to the increase in gross profit associated with the increase in revenue discussed above. In addition, in 2010 the segment recognized $17.0 million in severance, other restructuring charges, and asset impairment charges as well as $6.6 million of costs associated with the segment’s two acquisitions during 2010 compared to $21.5 million of such costs in 2009.

EMEA Segment

EMEA total revenues, which include affiliate revenues, increased in 2011 compared to 2010 due to higher affiliate sales of $40.8 million. Higher unit sales volume, as well as pricing changes related to non-copper commodity cost increases and other pricing changes, resulted in an increase in revenues of $22.6 million for 2011. The increase in revenues was also due to favorable currency translation of $20.6 million resulting primarily from the euro strengthening against the U.S. dollar. Higher selling prices due to increases in copper costs contributed an estimated $6 million to the increase in revenues. Acquisitions resulted in a $0.4 million increase in revenues.

Operating income increased in 2011 over 2010 primarily due to the increases in revenues discussed above. Operating income also increased due to improved product group mix, which reflects more revenues from our relatively higher gross profit margin networking and connectivity product platforms as compared to cable products. An increase in income from our equity method investment in a joint venture in China contributed $1.2 million to the increase in operating income. Operating income was positively impacted by decreases in restructuring costs and asset impairment charges of $6.7 million from 2010 to 2011.

EMEA total revenues increased $52.8 million in 2010 over 2009 due to increased market share and higher unit sales volume as demand in the segment’s served markets strengthened and due to higher affiliate sales of $21.2 million. These increases were partially offset by unfavorable currency translation of $17.9 million

23

Table of Contents

primarily from the U.S. dollar strengthening against the euro and by lost revenues of $17.7 million from the disposition of a German cable business in 2009. The remaining increase in revenue was due to an increase in copper prices.

Operating income increased in 2010 over 2009 primarily due to the increase in revenues discussed above and a decrease in impairment charges and other restructuring costs. In 2010, the segment recognized $10.5 million in restructuring costs and impairment charges, while in 2009 it recognized $77.3 million in restructuring costs, impairment charges, and loss on the sale of assets.

Asia Pacific Segment

Asia Pacific total revenues, which include affiliate revenues, increased in 2011 compared to 2010 primarily due to higher selling prices as a result of an estimated increase in copper costs of $25 million. Favorable currency translation, primarily from the Chinese renminbi strengthening against the U.S. dollar, resulted in $7.4 million of the increase in revenues. Higher unit sales volume, as well as pricing changes related to non-copper commodity costs and other pricing changes, resulted in an increase in revenue of $1.9 million. Higher affiliate sales contributed $1.1 million to the increase in revenues.

Operating income decreased in 2011 compared to 2010. A challenging pricing environment and decreased demand in the consumer electronics end market resulted in negative operating income for our consumer electronics business in the segment. We are evaluating strategic alternatives to address this underperforming business in the Asia Pacific segment. Operating income also decreased due to strategic investments in the region, including investments in the Market Delivery System, Lean Enterprise, and Talent Management. In addition, operating income decreased due to a $1.4 million increase in severance costs in 2011 compared to 2010.

Asia Pacific total revenues increased in 2010 over 2009, due to higher unit sales volume of $34.5 million as demand in the segment’s served markets recovered and an estimated $31 million in higher sales from the impact of higher copper prices during 2010.

Operating income increased in 2010 over 2009 primarily due to the increase in revenues discussed above.

Product Group Information

Revenues by major product group were as follows:

The primary reasons for the increase in our cable product revenue from 2010 to 2011 were an estimated $75 million increase in copper prices, a $48.0 million increase in volume, and a $26.0 million increase due to acquisitions. For our networking products, the primary reasons for the increase in revenue from 2010 to 2011 were an increase in volume of $56.7 million and the impact of our acquisitions completed in 2010 and 2011,

24

Table of Contents

which contributed $28.9 million of the revenue increase. The primary reasons for the increase in revenue from connectivity products in 2011 compared to 2010 were our completed acquisitions, which contributed $69.3 million to the increase in revenues, and an increase in volume of $25.7 million. The remaining increases were due to the impact of favorable currency translation.

The increase in cable product revenue from 2009 to 2010 was due to estimated sales price increases of approximately $75 million due to increases in copper prices as well as an increase in volume and favorable currency translation. Acquisitions contributed $14.7 million to the increase in networking product revenue from 2009 to 2010. The remainder of the increase in networking product revenue was due to increases in volume and favorable currency translation. The increase in connectivity product revenue from 2009 to 2010 was due to increases in volume and favorable currency translation.

Networking and connectivity products as a percentage of our total revenues increased from 24% and 25% in 2009 and 2010, respectively, to 30% in 2011. In general, we realize higher gross profit margins on our revenues from networking and connectivity products as compared to our cable products.

Discontinued Operations

During 2010, we sold Trapeze for $152.1 million in cash. We acquired Trapeze in 2008. The sale of Trapeze generated an after tax gain of $44.8 million, which is included in discontinued operations. The results of operations for Trapeze have also been included in discontinued operations.

During 2005, we completed the sale of our discontinued communications cable operation in Phoenix, Arizona. In connection with this sale and related tax deductions, we established a reserve for uncertain tax positions. Interest expense associated with these uncertain tax positions is included in discontinued operations.

See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more information about these matters.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Significant factors affecting our cash liquidity include (1) cash provided by operating activities, (2) disposals of businesses and tangible assets, (3) exercises of stock options, (4) cash used for acquisitions, restructuring actions, capital expenditures, share repurchases, dividends, and senior subordinated note repurchases, and (5) our available credit facilities and other borrowing arrangements. We expect our operating activities to generate cash in 2012 and believe our sources of liquidity are sufficient to fund current working capital requirements, capital expenditures, contributions to our retirement plans, share repurchases, senior subordinated note repurchases, quarterly dividend payments, and our short-term operating strategies. Our ability to continue to fund our future needs from business operations could be affected by many factors, including, but not limited to: economic conditions worldwide, customer demand, competitive market forces, customer acceptance of our product mix, and commodities pricing.

The following table is derived from our Consolidated Cash Flow Statements:

25

Table of Contents

Net cash provided by operating activities, a key source of our liquidity, increased by $73.0 million in 2011 compared to 2010. The $46.0 million increase in income from continuing operations is the most significant factor impacting the increase in net cash provided by operating activities.

In addition, net cash provided by operating activities increased in 2011 compared to 2010 due to changes in operating assets and liabilities. In 2011, changes in operating assets and liabilities were a source of cash of $13.9 million, as compared to a use of cash of $14.5 million in 2010. Accounts receivable were a source of cash of $4.7 million in 2011 compared to a use of cash of $39.5 million in 2010. While revenue increased by 23% in 2011 compared to 2010, our days’ sales outstanding improved from 62 days as of December 31, 2010 to 58 days as of December 31, 2011. We calculate days’ sales outstanding by dividing accounts receivable as of the end of the quarter by the average daily revenues recognized during the quarter. The improvement in net cash provided by operating activities due to changes in accounts receivable were partially offset by changes in accounts payable and accrued liabilities. In 2011, accounts payable and accrued liabilities were a source of cash of $21.6 million, compared to a source of cash of $30.3 million in 2010. Our days’ payables outstanding decreased from 84 days as of December 31, 2010 to 81 days as of December 31, 2011. We calculate days’ payables outstanding by dividing accounts payable and accrued liabilities as of the end of the quarter by the average daily cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expenses.

Net cash used for investing activities totaled $99.4 million in 2011 compared to $8.4 million in 2010. Investing activities in 2011 included payments for our acquisitions, net of cash acquired, of $60.5 million, primarily for our acquisitions of ICM, Poliron, and Byres Security. Investing activities in 2011 also included capital expenditures of $40.1 million and the receipt of $1.2 million of proceeds from the sale of tangible assets, primarily real estate in the Americas segment. Investing activities in 2010 included the receipt of $139.0 million of proceeds from the sale of businesses and tangible assets, primarily from our sale of Trapeze. Investing activities in 2010 also included $119.1 million of payments for our acquisitions, net of cash acquired, of GarrettCom and the Communications Products business of Thomas & Betts, and capital expenditures of $28.2 million. We anticipate that future capital expenditures will be funded with available cash.

Net cash used for financing activities totaled $56.3 million in 2011 compared to $48.4 million 2010. The most significant component of cash used for financing activities in 2011 was payments under our share repurchase program of $50.0 million through prepaid variable share repurchase agreements. In 2011, we also paid $9.4 million and $3.3 million of cash dividends and debt issuance costs, respectively, and we received $4.6 million of proceeds from the exercise of stock options. The most significant component of cash used for financing activities in 2010 was the repayment of $46.3 million of outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit facility. In 2010, we also paid $9.4 million of cash dividends, and we received $4.2 million and $3.2 million of proceeds from the termination of derivative instruments and the exercise of stock options, respectively.

Our cash and cash equivalents balance was $382.7 million as of December 31, 2011. Of this amount, $290.2 million was held outside of the U.S. in our foreign operations. Substantially all of the foreign cash and cash equivalents are readily convertible into U.S. dollars or other foreign currencies. Our strategic plan does not require the repatriation of foreign cash in order to fund our operations in the U.S., and it is our current intention to permanently reinvest the foreign cash and cash equivalents outside of the U.S. If we were to repatriate the foreign cash to the U.S., we may be required to accrue and pay U.S. taxes in accordance with applicable U.S. tax rules and regulations as a result of the repatriation.

Our outstanding debt obligations as of December 31, 2011, consisted of $350.0 million aggregate principal of 7.0% senior subordinated notes due 2017 and $200.0 million aggregate principal of 9.25% senior subordinated notes due 2019. As of December 31, 2011, there were no outstanding borrowings under our senior secured credit facility, and we had $386.0 million in available borrowing capacity. We were in compliance with all of the amended covenants of the facility as of December 31, 2011. Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contains an additional discussion regarding our various borrowing arrangements.

26

Table of Contents

Contractual obligations outstanding at December 31, 2011, have the following scheduled maturities:

Our commercial commitments expire or mature as follows:

Standby financial letters of credit, guarantees, and surety bonds are generally issued to secure obligations we have for a variety of commercial reasons such as workers compensation self-insurance programs in several states and the importation and exportation of product.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows that are or would be considered material to investors.

Current-Year Adoption of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Discussion regarding our adoption of accounting pronouncements is included in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the

27

Table of Contents

amounts reported in our Consolidated Financial Statements. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience or various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, and the results form the basis for making judgments about the reported values of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant estimates and judgments used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements. We provide a detailed discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue when all of the following circumstances are satisfied: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (2) price is fixed or determinable, (3) collectibility is reasonably assured, and (4) delivery has occurred. Delivery occurs in the period in which the customer takes title and assumes the risks and rewards of ownership of the products specified in the customer’s purchase order or sales agreement.

Accounts Receivable

At the time of sale, we establish an estimated reserve for trade, promotion, and other special price reductions such as contract pricing, discounts to meet competitor pricing, and on-time payment discounts. We also adjust receivables balances for, among other things, correction of billing errors, incorrect shipments, and settlement of customer disputes. Customers are allowed to return inventory if and when certain conditions regarding the physical state of the inventory and our approval of the return are met. Certain distribution customers are allowed to return inventory at original cost, in an amount not to exceed three percent of the prior year’s purchases, in exchange for an order of equal or greater value. Until we can process these reductions, corrections, and returns (together, the Adjustments) through individual customer records, we estimate the amount of outstanding Adjustments and recognize them by reducing revenues and accounts receivable. We also adjust inventory and cost of sales for the estimated level of returns. We base these estimates on historical and anticipated sales demand, trends in product pricing, and historical and anticipated Adjustments patterns. We make revisions to these estimates in the period in which the facts that give rise to each revision become known. Future market conditions and product transitions might require us to take actions to further reduce prices and increase customer return authorizations.

We evaluate the collectability of accounts receivable based on the specific identification method. A considerable amount of judgment is required in assessing the realization of accounts receivable, including the current creditworthiness of each customer and related aging of the past due balances. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition. Through these evaluations, we may become aware of a situation where a customer may not be able to meet its financial obligations due to deterioration of its financial viability, credit ratings, or bankruptcy. In circumstances where we are aware of a customer’s inability or unwillingness to pay outstanding amounts, we record a specific reserve for bad debts against amounts due to reduce the receivable to its estimated collectible balance. There have been occasions in the past where we recognized an expense associated with the rapid collapse of a distributor for which no specific reserve had been previously established. The reserve requirements are based on the best facts available to us and are reevaluated and adjusted as additional information is received.

Inventories

We evaluate the realizability of our inventory on a product-by-product basis in light of sales demand, technological changes, product life cycle, component cost trends, product pricing, and inventory condition. In circumstances where inventory levels are in excess of historical and anticipated market demand, where inventory is deemed technologically obsolete or not saleable due to condition, or where inventory cost exceeds net realizable value, we record a charge to cost of goods sold and reduce the inventory to its net realizable value.

28

Table of Contents

Deferred Tax Assets

We recognize deferred tax assets resulting from tax credit carryforwards, net operating loss carryforwards, and deductible temporary differences between taxable income on our income tax returns and income before taxes under generally accepted accounting principles. Deferred tax assets generally represent future tax benefits to be received when these carryforwards can be applied against future taxable income or when expenses previously reported in our Consolidated Financial Statements become deductible for income tax purposes. A deferred tax asset valuation allowance is required when some portion or all of the deferred tax assets may not be realized. We are required to estimate taxable income in future years or develop tax strategies that would enable tax asset realization in each taxing jurisdiction and use judgment to determine whether to record a deferred tax asset valuation allowance for part or all of a deferred tax asset.

We consider the weight of all available evidence, both positive and negative, in assessing the realizability of the deferred tax assets associated with net operating losses. We consider the reversals of existing taxable temporary differences as well as projections of future taxable income. We consider the future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences to the extent they were of the same character as the temporary differences giving rise to the deferred tax assets. We also consider whether the future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences will occur in the same period and jurisdiction as the temporary differences giving rise to the deferred tax assets. The assumptions utilized to estimate our future taxable income are consistent with those assumptions utilized for purposes of testing goodwill for impairment.

We also have significant tax credit carryforwards in the United States on which we have not recorded a valuation allowance. The utilization of these credits is dependent upon the recognition of both U.S. taxable income as well as income characterized as foreign source under the U.S. tax laws. We expect to generate enough taxable income in the future to utilize these tax credits. Furthermore, in 2012 we expect to continue implementation of tax planning strategies that will help generate sufficient foreign source income in the carryforward period.

We include in our deferred income tax liabilities those amounts that may be owing to Cooper Industries under the tax sharing agreement that we entered into with Cooper prior to our initial public offering in October 1993. The tax sharing agreement would require us to pay to Cooper the majority of any tax benefits realized as a result of the step-up in basis of our assets at the time of our initial public offering, which has primarily included amortization deductions.

Income Taxes

Our effective tax rate is based on expected income, statutory tax rates, and tax planning opportunities available to us in the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Significant judgment is required in determining our effective tax rate and in evaluating our uncertain tax positions. We establish accruals for uncertain tax positions when we believe that the full amount of the associated tax benefit may not be realized. To the extent we were to prevail in matters for which accruals have been established or would be required to pay amounts in excess of reserves, there could be a material effect on our income tax provisions in the period in which such determination is made. In addition, our foreign subsidiaries’ undistributed income is considered to be indefinitely reinvested and, accordingly, we do not record a provision for United States federal and state income taxes on this foreign income. If this income was not considered to be indefinitely reinvested, it would be subject to United States federal and state income taxes and could materially affect our income tax provision.

Long-Lived Assets

The valuation and classification of long-lived assets and the assignment of depreciation and amortization useful lives and salvage values involve significant judgments and the use of estimates. The testing of these long-lived assets under established accounting guidelines for impairment also requires significant use of judgment and

29

Table of Contents

assumptions, particularly as it relates to the identification of asset groups and reporting units and the determination of fair market value. We test our tangible long-lived assets and intangible long-lived assets subject to amortization for impairment when indicators of impairment exist. We test our goodwill and intangible long-lived assets not subject to amortization for impairment on an annual basis during the fourth quarter or when indicators of impairment exist. We base our estimates on assumptions we believe to be reasonable, but which are not predictable with precision and therefore are inherently uncertain. Actual future results could differ from these estimates.

For purposes of impairment testing of long-lived assets, we have identified asset groups at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities.

We do not amortize goodwill, but test it annually for impairment at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit is an operating segment, or a business unit one level below an operating segment if discrete financial information for that business is prepared and regularly reviewed by segment management. However, components within an operating segment are aggregated as a single reporting unit if they have similar economic characteristics. We determined that each of our reportable segments (Americas, EMEA, and Asia Pacific) represents an operating segment. Within those operating segments, we have identified reporting units based on whether there is discrete financial information prepared that is regularly reviewed by segment management. As a result of this evaluation, we have identified five reporting units within Americas, four reporting units within EMEA, and two reporting units within Asia Pacific for purposes of goodwill impairment testing.

In 2011, we adopted new accounting guidance related to our goodwill impairment evaluation that allows for the performance of an optional qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. We make this evaluation based on the weight of all available evidence and the significance of all identified events and circumstances that may influence the fair value of a reporting unit. If it is more likely than not that the fair value is less than the carrying value, then we calculate and compare the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value, as described in the paragraph below. In 2011, we performed the qualitative assessment for all but two of our reporting units with goodwill. For those reporting units for which we performed a qualitative assessment, we determined that it was more likely than not that the fair value was greater than the carrying value, and therefore, we did not perform the calculation of fair value for these reporting units as described in the paragraph below.

When we evaluate goodwill for impairment using a quantitative assessment, we compare the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. We determine the fair value using an income approach. Under the income approach, we calculate the fair value of a reporting unit based on the present value of estimated future cash flows using growth rates and discount rates that are consistent with current market conditions in our industry. For example, in our 2011 quantitative goodwill impairment analyses performed, the discount rates for our reporting units ranged from 13.5% to 16.5% and the long-term growth rates ranged from 0% to 4%. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying value of the net assets including goodwill assigned to that unit, goodwill is not impaired. If the carrying value of the reporting unit’s net assets including goodwill exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, then we determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. If the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, then an impairment of goodwill has occurred and we recognize an impairment loss for the difference between the carrying amount and the implied fair value of goodwill as a component of operating income.

We determined that none of our goodwill was impaired during 2011. The fair values of our reporting units were substantially in excess of the carrying values as of our most recent impairment testing date, except for one recently acquired reporting unit.

The relationship between the fair value of a reporting unit and the carrying value of a reporting unit is influenced by many factors, including the length of time that has passed since the reporting unit was initially acquired. Upon acquisition, the carrying value of a reporting unit typically approximates its fair value. As such, the fair value of a recently acquired reporting unit typically is not substantially in excess of its carrying value.

30

Table of Contents

Accrued Sales Rebates

We grant incentive rebates to participating distributors as part of our sales programs. The rebates are determined based on certain targeted sales volumes. Rebates are paid quarterly or annually in either cash or receivables credits. Until we can process these rebates through individual customer records, we estimate the amount of outstanding rebates and recognize them as accrued liabilities and reductions in our gross revenues. We base our estimates on both historical and anticipated sales demand and rebate program participation. We charge revisions to these estimates back to accrued liabilities and revenues in the period in which the facts that give rise to each revision become known. Future market conditions and product transitions might require us to take actions to increase sales rebates offered, possibly resulting in an incremental increase in accrued liabilities and an incremental reduction in revenues at the time the rebate is offered.

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

Our pension and other postretirement benefit costs and obligations are dependent on the various actuarial assumptions used in calculating such amounts. These assumptions relate to discount rates, salary growth, long-term return on plan assets, health care cost trend rates, and other factors. We base the discount rate assumptions on current investment yields on high-quality corporate long-term bonds. The salary growth assumptions reflect our long-term actual experience and future or near-term outlook. Long-term return on plan assets is determined based on historical portfolio results and management’s expectation of the future economic environment. Our health care cost trend assumptions are developed based on historical cost data, the near-term outlook, and an assessment of likely long-term trends. Our key assumptions are described in further detail in Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Actual results that differ from our assumptions are accumulated and, if in excess of the lesser of 10% of the projected benefit obligation or the fair market value of plan assets, amortized over the estimated future working life of the plan participants.

Share-Based Compensation

We compensate certain employees and non-employee directors with various forms of share-based payment awards and recognize compensation costs for these awards based on their fair values. The fair values of certain awards are estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing formula, which incorporates certain assumptions regarding the expected term of an award and expected stock price volatility. We develop the expected term assumption based on the vesting period and contractual term of an award, our historical exercise and post-vesting cancellation experience, our stock price history, plan provisions that require exercise or cancellation of awards after employees terminate, and the extent to which currently available information indicates that the future is reasonably expected to differ from past experience. We develop the expected volatility assumption based on historical price data for our common stock and other economic data trended into future years. After calculating the aggregate fair value of an award, we use an estimated forfeiture rate to discount the amount of share-based compensation cost to be recognized in our operating results over the service period of the award. We develop the forfeiture assumption based on our historical pre-vesting cancellation experience. Our key assumptions are described in further detail in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Business Combination Accounting

We allocate the cost of an acquired entity to the assets and liabilities acquired based upon their estimated fair values at the business combination date. We also identify and estimate the fair values of intangible assets that should be recognized as assets apart from goodwill. We have historically relied upon the use of third-party valuation specialists to assist in the estimation of fair values for inventories, tangible long-lived assets, and intangible assets other than goodwill. The carrying values of acquired receivables and accounts payable have historically approximated their fair values at the business combination date. With respect to accrued liabilities acquired, we use all available information to make our best estimates of their fair values at the business combination date. When necessary, we rely upon the use of third-party actuaries to assist in the estimation of fair value for certain liabilities.

31

Table of Contents

Item 7A.     Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risks relating to our operations result primarily from currency exchange rates, certain commodity prices, interest rates, and credit extended to customers. Each of these risks is discussed below.

Currency Exchange Rate Risk

For most of our products, the currency in which we sell the product is the same as the currency in which we incur the costs to manufacture the product, resulting in a natural hedge. Our currency exchange rate management strategy primarily involves the use of natural techniques, where possible, such as the offsetting or netting of like-currency cash flows. We did not have any foreign currency derivatives outstanding as of December 31, 2011.

We generally view our investments in international subsidiaries with functional currencies other than the United States dollar as long-term. As a result, we do not generally use derivatives to manage these net investments. In terms of foreign currency translation risk, we are exposed primarily to exchange rate movements between the United States dollar and the euro, Canadian dollar, Hong Kong dollar, Chinese yuan, Mexican peso, Australian dollar, British pound, and Brazilian real. Our net foreign currency investment in foreign subsidiaries and affiliates translated into United States dollars using year-end exchange rates was $337.6 million and $258.3 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. We estimate a one percent change of the United States dollar relative to foreign currencies would have changed 2011 pre-tax income (loss) of our foreign operations by less than $1.0 million. This sensitivity analysis has inherent limitations as it assumes that rates of multiple foreign currencies will always move in the same direction relative to the value of the United States dollar over time.

Commodity Price Risk

Certain raw materials used by us are subject to price volatility caused by supply conditions, political and economic variables, and other unpredictable factors. The primary purpose of our commodity price management activities is to manage the volatility associated with purchases of commodities in the normal course of business. We do not speculate on commodity prices.

We are exposed to price risk related to our purchase of copper used in the manufacture of our products. Our copper price management strategy involves the use of natural techniques, where possible, such as purchasing copper for future delivery at fixed prices. We do not generally use commodity price derivatives and did not have any outstanding at December 31, 2011.

The following table presents unconditional copper purchase obligations outstanding at December 31, 2011. The unconditional copper purchase obligations will settle during 2012.

We are also exposed to price risk related to our purchase of selected commodities derived from petrochemical feedstocks used in the manufacture of our products. We generally purchase these commodities based upon market prices established with the vendors as part of the purchase process. Pricing of these commodities is volatile as they tend to fluctuate with the price of oil. Historically, we have not used commodity financial instruments to hedge prices for commodities derived from petrochemical feedstocks.

32

Table of Contents

Interest Rate Risk

We have occasionally managed our debt portfolio by using interest rate derivative instruments, such as swap agreements, to achieve an overall desired position of fixed and floating rates. We were not a party to any interest rate derivative instruments as of or for the year ended December 31, 2011. During 2010, we entered into and exited from interest rate derivative instruments. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The following table provides information about our financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. The table presents principal amounts by expected maturity dates and fair values as of December 31, 2011.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to significant concentrations of credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. We are exposed to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to these financial instruments. We place cash and cash equivalents with various high-quality financial institutions throughout the world, and exposure is limited at any one financial institution. Although we do not obtain collateral or other security to support these financial instruments, we evaluate the credit standing of the counterparty financial institutions. At December 31, 2011, we had $33.0 million in accounts receivable outstanding from Anixter International Inc. This represented approximately 11% of our total accounts receivable outstanding at December 31, 2011. Anixter generally pays all outstanding receivables within thirty to sixty days of invoice receipt.

33

Table of Contents

Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Belden Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Belden Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Belden Inc. at December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Belden Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 29, 2012, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

St. Louis, Missouri

February 29, 2012

34

Table of Contents

Belden Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements

35

Table of Contents

Belden Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations