BENCHMARK ELECTRONICS INC - Quarter Report: 2008 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
_______________
FORM
10-Q
_______________
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT
OF 1934
For
the quarterly period ended September
30, 2008.
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT
OF 1934
For
the transition period from _________________
to________________.
Commission
File Number: 1-10560
BENCHMARK
ELECTRONICS, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Texas
|
74-2211011
|
(State
or other jurisdiction
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
of
incorporation or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
|
|
3000
Technology Drive
|
77515
|
Angleton,
Texas
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(979)
849-6550
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No
þ
As
of
November
7, 2008 there were 65,112,698 Common Shares of Benchmark Electronics, Inc.,
par
value $0.10 per share, outstanding.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Page
|
||
2
|
||
2
|
||
3
|
||
4
|
||
5
|
||
6
|
||
7-20
|
||
21
|
||
32
|
||
32
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
33
|
||
33
|
||
34
|
||
35
|
||
35
|
||
36
|
||
37
|
PART
I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
BENCHMARK
ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
(in
thousands, except par value)
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||
(unaudited)
|
|||||||
Assets
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
341,361
|
$
|
199,198
|
|||
Short-term
investments
|
—
|
182,825
|
|||||
Accounts
receivable, net of allowance for doubtful
|
|||||||
accounts
of $982 and $1,406, respectively
|
415,455
|
485,907
|
|||||
Inventories,
net
|
362,692
|
361,952
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
38,529
|
60,847
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
12,675
|
14,562
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
1,170,712
|
1,305,291
|
|||||
Long-term
investments
|
47,907
|
—
|
|||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net of accumulated
|
|||||||
depreciation
of $253,932 and $233,439 respectively
|
141,745
|
144,182
|
|||||
Goodwill,
net
|
283,194
|
283,725
|
|||||
Other,
net
|
25,810
|
29,650
|
|||||
$
|
1,669,368
|
$
|
1,762,848
|
||||
Liabilities
and Shareholders’ Equity
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Current
installments of long-term
|
|||||||
debt
and capital lease obligations
|
$
|
273
|
$
|
430
|
|||
Accounts
payable
|
289,725
|
359,422
|
|||||
Income
taxes payable
|
76
|
1,699
|
|||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
58,621
|
59,509
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
348,695
|
421,060
|
|||||
Long-term
debt and capital lease obligations, less
|
|||||||
current
installments
|
11,749
|
12,096
|
|||||
Other
long-term liabilities
|
29,337
|
31,762
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
12,164
|
9,408
|
|||||
Shareholders’
equity:
|
|||||||
Preferred
shares, $0.10 par value; 5,000 shares
|
|||||||
authorized,
none issued
|
—
|
—
|
|||||
Common
shares, $0.10 par value; 145,000 shares
|
|||||||
authorized;
issued - 65,822 and 70,687, respectively;
|
|||||||
outstanding
- 65,711 and 70,576, respectively
|
6,571
|
7,058
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
743,334
|
793,272
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
525,222
|
486,848
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
(7,432
|
)
|
1,616
|
||||
Less
treasury shares, at cost; 111 shares
|
(272
|
)
|
(272
|
)
|
|||
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
1,267,423
|
1,288,522
|
|||||
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|||||||
$
|
1,669,368
|
$
|
1,762,848
|
See
accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
BENCHMARK
ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(unaudited)
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
(in
thousands, except per share data)
|
|||||||||||||
Sales
|
$
|
641,672
|
$
|
672,595
|
$
|
2,008,397
|
$
|
2,181,372
|
|||||
Cost
of sales
|
597,376
|
633,818
|
1,872,859
|
2,033,612
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit
|
44,296
|
38,777
|
135,538
|
147,760
|
|||||||||
Selling,
general and
|
|||||||||||||
administrative
expenses
|
21,329
|
21,999
|
67,266
|
69,466
|
|||||||||
Amortization
of intangibles
|
446
|
447
|
1,340
|
1,341
|
|||||||||
Restructuring
charges and integration costs
|
253
|
1,451
|
253
|
7,001
|
|||||||||
Income
from operations
|
22,268
|
14,880
|
66,679
|
69,952
|
|||||||||
Interest
income
|
1,680
|
3,106
|
6,909
|
7,555
|
|||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(378
|
)
|
(411
|
)
|
(1,102
|
)
|
(1,786
|
)
|
|||||
Other
income (expense)
|
(790
|
)
|
725
|
1,547
|
1,578
|
||||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
22,780
|
18,300
|
74,033
|
77,299
|
|||||||||
Income
tax benefit (expense)
|
1,145
|
3,709
|
(5,057
|
)
|
(4,893
|
)
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
23,925
|
$
|
22,009
|
$
|
68,976
|
$
|
72,406
|
|||||
Earnings
per share:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$
|
0.36
|
$
|
0.30
|
$
|
1.02
|
$
|
1.00
|
|||||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.36
|
$
|
0.30
|
$
|
1.01
|
$
|
0.99
|
|||||
Weighted-average
number of shares outstanding:
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
66,268
|
72,951
|
67,693
|
72,314
|
|||||||||
Diluted
|
66,630
|
73,626
|
68,251
|
73,313
|
See
accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
BENCHMARK
ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive
Income
(unaudited)
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
23,925
|
$
|
22,009
|
$
|
68,976
|
$
|
72,406
|
|||||
Other
comprehensive income:
|
|||||||||||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustments
|
(8,753
|
)
|
2,793
|
(3,280
|
)
|
6,263
|
|||||||
Unrealized
loss on investments
|
(2,852
|
)
|
—
|
(5,768
|
)
|
—
|
|||||||
Comprehensive
income
|
$
|
12,320
|
$
|
24,802
|
$
|
59,928
|
$
|
78,669
|
The
components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are
as
follows:
|
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
(in
thousands)
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||
Cumulative
foreign currency translation gains (losses)
|
$
|
(1,664
|
)
|
$
|
1,616
|
||
Unrealized
loss on investments
|
(5,768
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
$
|
(7,432
|
)
|
$
|
1,616
|
See
accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
BENCHMARK
ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’
Equity
(unaudited)
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Additional
|
other
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Common
|
paid-in
|
Retained
|
comprehensive
|
Treasury
|
shareholders’
|
|||||||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
Shares
|
shares
|
capital
|
earning
|
|
income
(loss)
|
|
shares
|
|
equity
|
||||||||||||
Balances,
December 31, 2007
|
70,576
|
$
|
7,058
|
$
|
793,272
|
$
|
486,848
|
$
|
1,616
|
$
|
(272
|
)
|
$
|
1,288,522
|
||||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
—
|
—
|
2,432
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
2,432
|
|||||||||||||||
Shares
repurchased and retired
|
(5,204
|
)
|
(521
|
)
|
(55,950
|
)
|
(30,602
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
(87,073
|
)
|
||||||||||
Stock
options exercised
|
300
|
30
|
2,792
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
2,822
|
|||||||||||||||
Issuance
of restricted shares
|
39
|
4
|
(4
|
)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
||||||||||||||
Federal
tax benefit of
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
stock
options exercised
|
—
|
—
|
792
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
792
|
|||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income (loss)
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
68,976
|
(9,048
|
)
|
—
|
59,928
|
||||||||||||||
Balances,
September 30, 2008
|
65,711
|
$
|
6,571
|
$
|
743,334
|
$
|
525,222
|
$
|
(7,432
|
)
|
$
|
(272
|
)
|
$
|
1,267,423
|
See
accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
BENCHMARK
ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows
(unaudited)
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||
September
30,
|
|||||||
(in
thousands)
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
68,976
|
$
|
72,406
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
|
|||||||
operating
activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
30,329
|
32,003
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
4,643
|
7,256
|
|||||
Gain
on the sale of property, plant and equipment
|
(46
|
)
|
(511
|
)
|
|||
Asset
impairments
|
—
|
273
|
|||||
Stock-based
compensation expense
|
2,432
|
2,440
|
|||||
Federal
tax benefit of disqualified dispositions
|
266
|
795
|
|||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects
|
|||||||
from
acquisitions:
|
|||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
69,521
|
146,553
|
|||||
Inventories
|
(1,945
|
)
|
113,795
|
||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
23,127
|
7,030
|
|||||
Accounts
payable
|
(69,113
|
)
|
(123,155
|
)
|
|||
Accrued
liabilities
|
1,118
|
(26,058
|
)
|
||||
Income
taxes
|
(4,475
|
)
|
(6,094
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash provided by operations
|
124,833
|
226,733
|
|||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|||||||
Purchases
of investments
|
(162,709
|
)
|
(375,850
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from sales and maturities of investments
|
291,850
|
260,870
|
|||||
Additions
to property, plant and equipment
|
(24,980
|
)
|
(12,257
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from the sale of property, plant and equipment
|
235
|
1,889
|
|||||
Other
|
—
|
400
|
|||||
Additions
to purchased software
|
(133
|
)
|
(1,626
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash acquired in acquisitions
|
—
|
181
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
104,263
|
(126,393
|
)
|
||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from stock options exercised
|
2,822
|
8,793
|
|||||
Federal
tax benefit of disqualified dispositions
|
526
|
1,635
|
|||||
Principal
payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations
|
(539
|
)
|
(88,657
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from long-term debt
|
—
|
16,760
|
|||||
Share
repurchases
|
(87,073
|
)
|
(2,407
|
)
|
|||
Debt
issuance cost
|
(234
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(84,498
|
)
|
(63,876
|
)
|
|||
Effect
of exchange rate changes
|
(2,435
|
)
|
3,245
|
||||
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
142,163
|
39,709
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
199,198
|
123,872
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at September 30
|
$
|
341,361
|
$
|
163,581
|
See
accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial
statements.
6
BENCHMARK
ELECTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements
(amounts
in thousands, except
per share data, unless otherwise noted)
(unaudited)
Note
1 - Basis of Presentation
Benchmark
Electronics, Inc. (the Company) is a Texas corporation in the business of
manufacturing electronics and provides services to original equipment
manufacturers (OEMs) of computers and related products for business enterprises,
medical devices, industrial control equipment, testing and instrumentation
products and telecommunication equipment. The Company has manufacturing
operations located in the Americas, Asia and Europe.
The
condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared
by the Company without an audit pursuant to the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). The financial statements reflect
all normal and recurring adjustments which in the opinion of management are
necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of
operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The results of
operations for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the
results to be expected for the full year. The accompanying unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Management
of the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the
reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets
and
liabilities to prepare these financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Certain
reclassifications of prior period amounts have been made to conform to the
current presentation.
Note
2 - Stock-Based Compensation
The
Company’s stock awards plan permits the grant of a variety of types of awards,
including stock options, restricted stock awards, stock appreciation rights,
performance awards, and phantom stock awards, or any combination thereof, to
key
employees of the Company. Stock options are granted to employees with an
exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s stock on the date of
grant, vest over a four-year period from the date of grant and have a term
of
ten years. Restricted shares granted to employees vest over a four-year period
from the date of grant, subject to the continued employment of the employee
by
the Company. Members of the Board of Directors of the Company who are not
employees of the Company participate in a separate stock option plan that
provides for the granting of stock options upon the occurrence of the
non-employee director’s election or re-election to the Board of Directors. All
awards under the non-employee director stock option plan are fully vested upon
the date of grant and have a term of ten years. As of September
30, 2008, 5.1 million additional options or other equity awards may be
granted under the Company’s existing plans.
Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based
Payment” (SFAS No. 123R) requires all share-based payments to employees,
including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial
statements based on their fair values. The total compensation cost recognized
for equity awards was $0.4
million and $2.4 million for the three and nine month periods ended
September 30, 2008, and $0.6 million and $2.4 million for the three and nine
month periods ended September 30, 2007. The compensation expense for
stock-option awards includes an estimate for forfeitures and is recognized
over
the vesting period of the options using the straight-line method. SFAS No.
123R
requires that cash flows from the tax benefits resulting from tax deductions
in
excess of the compensation cost recognized for stock-based awards (excess tax
benefits) be classified as cash flows from financing activities. Awards of
restricted shares are valued at the closing market price of the Company’s stock
on the date of grant.
7
As
of
September 30,
2008, there was approximately $5.6 million of total unrecognized
compensation cost related to nonvested stock options. That cost is expected
to
be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.1 years.
The
Company did not issue
any
options during the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. During the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company issued 51 thousand
and 420 thousand options, respectively. In connection with the January 8, 2007
acquisition of Pemstar Inc. (Pemstar), all outstanding Pemstar options were
converted into 369 thousand options of the Company on January 8, 2007. The
fair
value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The weighted-average assumptions used to
value the options granted and the options converted from Pemstar during the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, were as
follows:
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
|||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||
Expected
term of options
|
—
|
—
|
7.0
years
|
2.7
years
|
||
Expected
volatility
|
—
|
—
|
42%
|
|
29%
|
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
—
|
—
|
3.67%
|
|
4.83%
|
|
Dividend
yield
|
—
|
—
|
zero
|
zero
|
The
expected term of the options represents the estimated period of time until
exercise and is based on historical experience, giving consideration to the
contractual terms, vesting schedules and expectations of future employee
behavior. Separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise
behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. Expected stock price
volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The
risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury zero-coupon rates in
effect at the time of grant with an equivalent remaining term. The dividend
yield reflects that the Company has not paid any cash dividends since
inception.
The
weighted-average fair value per option granted during the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 was $8.64. The total cash received as a
result of stock option exercises for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 and 2007 was approximately $2.8 million and $8.8 million, respectively,
and
the tax benefit realized as a result of the stock option exercises was $0.8
million and $2.4 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September
30,
2008 and 2007, the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $2.4
million and $7.7 million, respectively.
8
The
following table summarizes the activities relating to the Company’s stock
options during the nine months ended September 30, 2008:
Weighted-
|
|||||||||||||
Weighted-
|
Average
|
||||||||||||
Average
|
Remaining
|
Aggregate
|
|||||||||||
Number
of
|
Exercise
|
Contractual
|
Intrinsic
|
||||||||||
Options
|
Price
|
Term
(Years)
|
Value
|
||||||||||
Outstanding
at December 31, 2007
|
5,875
|
$
|
19.15
|
6.32
|
|||||||||
Granted
|
51
|
$
|
17.43
|
||||||||||
Exercised
|
(300
|
)
|
$
|
9.41
|
|||||||||
Forfeited
or expired
|
(293
|
)
|
$
|
23.30
|
|||||||||
Outstanding
at September 30, 2008
|
5,333
|
$
|
19.45
|
5.82
|
$
|
4,699
|
|||||||
Exercisable
at September 30, 2008
|
3,355
|
$
|
17.84
|
4.38
|
$
|
4,699
|
The
aggregate intrinsic value in the table above is before income taxes and is
calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying
options and the Company’s closing stock price of $14.08
as
of the last business day of the period ended September 30, 2008 for options
that had exercise prices that were lower than the closing price.
The
following table summarizes the activities related to the Company’s restricted
shares during the nine months ended September 30, 2008:
Weighted-
|
|||||||
Average
|
|||||||
Grant
Date
|
|||||||
Shares
|
Fair
Value
|
||||||
Non-vested
shares outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
—
|
—
|
|||||
Granted
|
39
|
$
|
17.54
|
||||
Non-vested
shares outstanding at September 30, 2008
|
39
|
$
|
17.54
|
As
of
September
30, 2008, there was $0.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related
to restricted share awards. That cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 3.46 years. As of September 30, 2008, there were
no
vested restricted shares.
9
Note
3 - Earnings Per Share
Basic
earnings per share is computed using the weighted-average number of shares
outstanding, adjusted for restricted shares. Diluted earnings per share is
computed using the weighted-average number of shares outstanding adjusted for
the incremental shares attributed to outstanding stock equivalents and
contingently returnable restricted shares, during the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. Stock equivalents include common shares
issuable upon the exercise of stock options and other equity instruments, and
are computed using the treasury stock method.
The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted earnings
per
share.
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Numerator
for basic earnings per share -
|
|||||||||||||
net
income
|
$
|
23,925
|
$
|
22,009
|
$
|
68,976
|
$
|
72,406
|
|||||
Interest
expense on convertible debt, net
|
|||||||||||||
of
tax
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
147
|
|||||||||
Numerator
for diluted earnings per share
|
$
|
23,925
|
$
|
22,009
|
$
|
68,976
|
$
|
72,553
|
|||||
Denominator
for basic earnings per share -
|
|||||||||||||
weighted-average
number of common
|
|||||||||||||
shares
outstanding during the period
|
66,268
|
72,951
|
67,693
|
72,314
|
|||||||||
Incremental
common shares attributable to
|
|||||||||||||
exercise
of outstanding dilutive options
|
276
|
526
|
455
|
699
|
|||||||||
Incremental
common shares attributable to
|
|||||||||||||
conversion
of 6.5% convertible debt
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
160
|
|||||||||
Incremental
common shares attributable
|
|||||||||||||
to
exercise of warrants
|
47
|
149
|
75
|
140
|
|||||||||
Incremental
common shares attributable to
|
|||||||||||||
contingently
returnable restricted shares
|
39
|
—
|
28
|
—
|
|||||||||
Denominator
for diluted earnings per share
|
66,630
|
73,626
|
68,251
|
73,313
|
|||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$
|
0.36
|
$
|
0.30
|
$
|
1.02
|
$
|
1.00
|
|||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$
|
0.36
|
$
|
0.30
|
$
|
1.01
|
$
|
0.99
|
Options
to purchase 4.0 million and 3.7 million common shares for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, were not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share because the option exercise price
was
greater than the average market price of the common shares for the respective
periods. Options to purchase 1.5 million and 3.0 million common shares for
the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, were not included
in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the option exercise
price was greater than the average market price of the common shares for the
respective periods.
As
of
September 30, 2008, the Company has outstanding warrants to purchase common
shares as follows:
Shares
|
Exercise
Price
|
Expiration
Date
|
|||||
126
|
$
|
14.25
|
May
1,
2009
|
||||
160
|
$
|
12.50
|
May
1,
2009
|
||||
40
|
$
|
10.125
|
July
18, 2009
|
These
warrants were assumed on January 8, 2007 in connection with an
acquisition.
10
Note
4 - Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill
associated with each of the Company’s business segments and changes in those
amounts during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 were as
follows:
Americas
|
Asia
|
Europe
|
|
Total
|
|||||||||
Goodwill,
December 31, 2007
|
$
|
226,122
|
$
|
37,912
|
$
|
19,691
|
$
|
283,725
|
|||||
Currency
translation adjustment
|
(21
|
)
|
—
|
(510
|
)
|
(531
|
)
|
||||||
Goodwill,
September 30, 2008
|
$
|
226,101
|
$
|
37,912
|
$
|
19,181
|
$
|
283,194
|
Other
assets consist primarily of acquired identifiable assets and capitalized
purchased software costs. Identifiable intangible assets and changes in those
amounts during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 were as
follows:
Gross
|
Net
|
|||||||||
Carrying
|
Accumulated
|
Carrying
|
||||||||
Amount
|
Amortization
|
Amount
|
||||||||
Customer
relationships, December 31, 2007
|
$
|
18,052
|
$
|
(1,864
|
)
|
$
|
16,188
|
|||
Amortization
of intangibles
|
—
|
(1,340
|
)
|
(1,340
|
)
|
|||||
Currency
translation adjustment
|
(48
|
)
|
13
|
(35
|
)
|
|||||
Customer
relationships, September 30, 2008
|
$
|
18,004
|
$
|
(3,191
|
)
|
$
|
14,813
|
Amortization
of these intangible assets for 2008 through 2017 will be approximately $1.8
million per year.
Note
5 - Borrowing Facilities
Long-term
debt and capital lease obligations outstanding as of September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007 consists of the following:
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Long-term
debt
|
$
|
8
|
$
|
192
|
|||
Capital
lease obligations
|
12,014
|
12,334
|
|||||
Total
|
12,022
|
12,526
|
|||||
Less
current installments
|
273
|
430
|
|||||
Long-term
debt and capital lease obligations,
|
|||||||
less
current installments
|
$
|
11,749
|
$
|
12,096
|
Under
the
terms of a Credit
Agreement (the Credit Agreement), the Company has a $100 million five-year
revolving credit facility for general corporate purposes with a maturity date
of
December 21, 2012. The Credit Agreement includes an accordion feature under
which total commitments under the facility may be increased by an additional
$100 million, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions and lender
approval.
Interest
on outstanding borrowings under the Credit Agreement is payable quarterly,
at
the Company’s option, at either LIBOR plus 0.75% to 1.75% or a prime rate plus
0.00% to 0.25%, based upon the Company’s debt ratio as specified in the Credit
Agreement. A commitment fee of 0.15% to 0.35% per annum (based upon the
Company’s debt ratio) on the unused portion of the revolving credit line is
payable quarterly in arrears. As of September 30, 2008, the Company had no
borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreement, $1.0 million in outstanding
letters of credit and $99.0 million was available for future
borrowings.
11
The
Credit Agreement is secured by the Company’s domestic inventory and accounts
receivable, 100% of the stock of the Company’s domestic subsidiaries, 65% of the
voting capital stock of each direct foreign subsidiary and substantially all
of
the other tangible and intangible assets of the Company and its domestic
subsidiaries. The Credit Agreement contains customary financial covenants as
to
working capital, debt leverage, fixed charges, and consolidated net worth,
and
restricts the ability of the Company to incur additional debt, pay dividends,
sell assets, and to merge or consolidate with other persons. As of September
30,
2008, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants and
restrictions.
The
Company’s Thailand subsidiary has a credit agreement with Kasikornbank Public
Company Limited (the Thai Credit Agreement). The Thai Credit Agreement provides
that the lender will make available to the Company’s Thailand subsidiary up to
approximately $16 million in revolving loans and machinery loans. The Thai
Credit Agreement is secured by land, buildings and machinery in Thailand. In
addition, the Thai Credit Agreement provides for approximately $1.8 million
(62
million Thai baht) in working capital availability in the form of working
capital loans (10 million Thai baht) and bank guarantees (52 million Thai baht).
Availability of funds under the Thai Credit Agreement is reviewed annually
and
is currently accessible through September 2009. As of September 30, 2008, the
Company’s Thailand subsidiary had no working capital borrowings
outstanding.
Note
6 - Inventories
Inventory
costs are summarized as follows:
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Raw
materials
|
$
|
263,511
|
$
|
262,765
|
|||
Work
in process
|
70,854
|
68,818
|
|||||
Finished
goods
|
28,327
|
30,369
|
|||||
$
|
362,692
|
$
|
361,952
|
Note
7 - Income Taxes
Income
tax expense (benefit) consists of the following:
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||
September
30,
|
|||||||
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|||
Federal
- Current
|
$
|
(3,252
|
)
|
$
|
(3,638
|
)
|
|
Foreign
- Current
|
3,609
|
888
|
|||||
State
- Current
|
57
|
387
|
|||||
Deferred
|
4,643
|
7,256
|
|||||
$
|
5,057
|
$
|
4,893
|
12
Income
tax expense differs from the amount computed by applying the U.S. federal
statutory income tax rate to income before income tax primarily due to a tax
benefit relating to a previously closed facility that generated a worthless
stock deduction of $3.4 million in 2008, the impact of foreign income taxes,
state income taxes (net of federal benefit) and tax-exempt interest
income.
The
Company considers earnings from foreign subsidiaries to be indefinitely
reinvested and, accordingly, no provision for U.S. federal and state income
taxes has been made for these earnings. Upon distribution of foreign subsidiary
earnings in the form of dividends or otherwise, such distributed earnings would
be reportable for U.S. income tax purposes (subject to adjustment for foreign
tax credits). Determination of the amount of any unrecognized deferred tax
liability on these undistributed earnings is currently not
practical.
The
Company has been granted certain tax incentives, including tax holidays, for
its
subsidiaries in China, Ireland, Malaysia and Thailand. These tax incentives,
including tax holidays, expire on various dates through 2012, and are
subject to certain conditions with which the Company expects to
comply.
The
net
impact of these tax incentives was to lower income tax expense for the nine
month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 by approximately $13.1 million
(approximately $0.20 per diluted share) and $12.1 million (approximately $0.16
per diluted share), respectively.
On
January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (FIN
48). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for
the
financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken in
a tax
return. Under FIN 48, the Company must determine whether it is
“more-likely-than-not” that a tax position will be sustained upon examination,
including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based
on
the technical merits of the position. Once it is determined that a position
meets the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the position is measured
to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements.
FIN
48 applies to all tax positions related to income taxes subject to SFAS
No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”.
As
of
September 30, 2008, the total amount of the reserve for uncertain tax benefits
including interest and penalties is $26.9 million. The reserve is classified
as
a current or long-term liability in the consolidated balance sheet based on
the
Company’s expectation of when the items will be settled in cash. The amount of
accrued potential interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits included
in the reserve as of September 30, 2008 is $2.2 million and $1.6 million,
respectively. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, the reserve
was
reduced by $3.7 million primarily as a result of the expiration of the statute
of limitations for a worthless stock deduction. No other material changes
affected the reserve during the quarter. During the next twelve months, it
is
reasonably possible that the reserve for uncertain tax benefits will decrease
by
an additional $5.1 million mainly due to the expiration of the statute of
limitations for additional worthless stock deductions and other prior year
unrecognized tax benefits. As of September 30, 2008, the Company’s business
locations in China, Ireland, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Mexico, the Netherlands,
Singapore, Thailand and the United States remain open to examination by the
various local taxing authorities, in total or in part, for fiscal years 2001
to
2008.
13
Note
8 - Segment and Geographic Information
The
Company has manufacturing facilities in the Americas, Asia and Europe to serve
its customers. The Company is operated and managed geographically. The Company’s
management evaluates performance and allocates the Company’s resources on a
geographic basis. Intersegment sales are generally recorded at prices that
approximate arm’s length transactions. Operating segments’ measure of
profitability is based on income from operations. The accounting policies for
the reportable operating segments are the same as for the Company taken as
a
whole. The Company has three reportable operating segments: the Americas,
Europe, and Asia. Information about operating segments was as
follows:
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|||||||
Sales:
|
|||||||||||||
Americas
|
$
|
410,444
|
$
|
458,499
|
$
|
1,322,700
|
$
|
1,591,600
|
|||||
Asia
|
234,766
|
254,763
|
714,430
|
710,695
|
|||||||||
Europe
|
58,487
|
74,553
|
199,891
|
272,875
|
|||||||||
Elimination
of intersegment sales
|
(62,025
|
)
|
(115,220
|
)
|
(228,624
|
)
|
(393,798
|
)
|
|||||
$
|
641,672
|
$
|
672,595
|
$
|
2,008,397
|
$
|
2,181,372
|
||||||
Depreciation
and amortization:
|
|||||||||||||
Americas
|
$
|
4,374
|
$
|
5,628
|
$
|
13,073
|
$
|
15,937
|
|||||
Asia
|
4,108
|
4,492
|
12,556
|
12,394
|
|||||||||
Europe
|
733
|
629
|
2,039
|
1,882
|
|||||||||
Corporate
|
907
|
483
|
2,661
|
1,790
|
|||||||||
$
|
10,122
|
$
|
11,232
|
$
|
30,329
|
$
|
32,003
|
||||||
Income
from operations:
|
|||||||||||||
Americas
|
$
|
9,043
|
$
|
4,776
|
$
|
31,360
|
$
|
37,660
|
|||||
Asia
|
18,415
|
16,780
|
55,427
|
46,087
|
|||||||||
Europe
|
1,438
|
504
|
2,789
|
2,559
|
|||||||||
Corporate
and intersegment eliminations
|
(6,628
|
)
|
(7,180
|
)
|
(22,897
|
)
|
(16,354
|
)
|
|||||
$
|
22,268
|
$
|
14,880
|
$
|
66,679
|
$
|
69,952
|
||||||
Capital
expenditures:
|
|||||||||||||
Americas
|
$
|
2,427
|
$
|
1,064
|
$
|
9,122
|
$
|
3,503
|
|||||
Asia
|
3,503
|
502
|
13,818
|
7,296
|
|||||||||
Europe
|
573
|
219
|
1,981
|
761
|
|||||||||
Corporate
|
5
|
1,261
|
192
|
2,323
|
|||||||||
$
|
6,508
|
$
|
3,046
|
$
|
25,113
|
$
|
13,883
|
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Total
assets:
|
|||||||
Americas
|
$
|
759,561
|
$
|
853,562
|
|||
Asia
|
501,277
|
514,078
|
|||||
Europe
|
128,694
|
140,948
|
|||||
Corporate
and other
|
279,836
|
254,260
|
|||||
$
|
1,669,368
|
$
|
1,762,848
|
14
The
following enterprise-wide information is provided in accordance with SFAS No.
131. Geographic sales information reflects the destination of the product
shipped. Long-lived assets information is based on the physical location of
the
asset.
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Geographic
sales:
|
|||||||||||||
United
States
|
$
|
478,056
|
$
|
515,964
|
$
|
1,513,619
|
$
|
1,666,155
|
|||||
Asia
|
54,451
|
35,858
|
164,368
|
123,126
|
|||||||||
Europe
|
98,374
|
114,004
|
300,789
|
365,848
|
|||||||||
Other
Foreign
|
10,791
|
6,769
|
29,621
|
26,243
|
|||||||||
$
|
641,672
|
$
|
672,595
|
$
|
2,008,397
|
$
|
2,181,372
|
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Long-lived
assets:
|
|||||||
United
States
|
$
|
77,401
|
$
|
86,602
|
|||
Asia
|
69,927
|
69,062
|
|||||
Europe
|
9,403
|
10,147
|
|||||
Other
|
10,824
|
8,021
|
|||||
$
|
167,555
|
$
|
173,832
|
Note
9 - Supplemental Cash Flow Information
The
following is additional information concerning supplemental disclosures of
cash
payments.
Three
Months Ended
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Income
taxes paid, net
|
$
|
1,667
|
$
|
1,108
|
$
|
4,130
|
$
|
1,056
|
|||||
Interest
paid
|
364
|
631
|
1,079
|
1,690
|
Note
10 - Contingencies
The
Company is involved in various legal actions arising in the ordinary course
of
business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these
matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated
financial position or results of operations.
The
Company is subject to examination by tax authorities for varying periods in
various U.S. and foreign tax jurisdictions. During the course of such
examinations disputes occur as to matters of fact and/or law. Also, in most
tax
jurisdictions the passage of time without examination will result in the
expiration of applicable statutes of limitations thereby precluding the taxing
authority from conducting an examination of the tax period(s) for which such
statute of limitation has expired. The Company believes that it has adequately
provided for its tax liabilities.
15
Note
11 - Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements” (SFAS No. 157), which defines fair value, establishes a framework
for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles, and
expands the requisite disclosures for fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157
is
effective in fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. In
February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 157-2,
“Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157,” which delays the effective date
of SFAS 157 one year for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities, except those recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis. On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS
No. 157 related to financial assets and liabilities.
See Note
14. On January 1, 2009, the Company will adopt the provisions for nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are not required or permitted to be
measured at fair value on a recurring basis, which include those measured at
fair value in goodwill impairment testing, indefinite-lived intangible assets
measured at fair value for impairment assessment, nonfinancial long-lived assets
measured at fair value for impairment assessment, asset retirement obligations
initially measured at fair value, and those initially measured at fair value
in
a business combination. The Company is still in the process of evaluating SFAS
No. 157 with respect to its effect on nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities and has not yet determined the impact that it will have on its
financial statements upon full adoption in 2009.
On
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 159 “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities-Including an Amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115” (SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to
measure many financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value.
Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been
elected are reported in earnings. The adoption of SFAS No. 159 did not have
an
effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations as it did
not elect the fair value option.
In
March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities-an amendment of FASB Statement No.133” (SFAS No. 161).
SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures about derivative and hedging
activities. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company
will be required to adopt SFAS No. 161 as of January 1, 2009. The Company does
not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 161 will have a material impact
on
its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In
April
2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets” (FSP No. 142-3). FSP No. 142-3 amends the factors that should
be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine
the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets” (SFAS No. 142). FSP No. 142-3 applies to all
intangible assets, whether acquired in a business combination or otherwise,
and
shall be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. FSP
No.
142-3 shall be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the
effective date. Early adoption of FSP No. 142-3 is prohibited. The Company
is
currently evaluating the impact that FSP No. 142-3 will have on its financial
statements.
16
In
May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles” (SFAS No. 162). SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of
accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be
used
in the preparation of financial statements presented in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles. SFAS No. 162 is effective 60
days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity
With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”. The implementation of this
standard will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
position and results of operations.
In
October 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of
a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active” (FSP No. 157-3).
FSP No. 157-3 clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157 in a market that is
not
active and illustrates how an entity would determine fair value of a financial
asset when the market for that financial asset is not active. FSP No. 157-3
provides guidance on how an entity’s own assumptions about cash flows and
discount rates should be considered when measuring fair value when relevant
market data does not exist, how observable market information in an inactive
or
dislocated market affects fair value measurements and how the use of broker
and
pricing service quotes should be considered when applying fair value
measurements. FSP No. 157-3 is effective immediately as of September 30, 2008
and for all interim and annual periods thereafter. The adoption of FSP No.
157-3
did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
Note
12 - Restructuring Charges and Integration Costs
The
Company has undertaken initiatives to restructure its business operations with
the intention of improving utilization and realizing cost savings in the future.
These initiatives have included changing the number and location of production
facilities, largely to align capacity and infrastructure with current and
anticipated customer demand. This alignment includes transferring programs
from
higher cost geographies to lower cost geographies. The process of restructuring
entails, among other activities, moving production between facilities, reducing
staff levels, realigning our business processes and reorganizing our
management.
The
Company recognized restructuring charges during 2007 related to reductions
in
workforce and the re-sizing of certain facilities. These charges were recorded
pursuant to plans developed and approved by management. Restructuring
charges associated with these realignment efforts primarily related to the
closure of our Redmond, Washington facility, the transfer of the Company’s
printed circuit board assembly (PCBA) operations in Dublin, Ireland to Brasov,
Romania and the consolidation and resizing of certain other
facilities.
17
The
following table summarizes the provisions, the respective payments and the
remaining accrued balance as of September 30, 2008 for estimated
restructuring charges incurred during 2007:
Facility
|
Other
|
||||||||||||
Lease
|
Exit
|
Total
|
|||||||||||
Severance
|
Costs
|
Costs
|
Costs
|
||||||||||
Balance
as of December 31, 2007
|
$
|
171
|
$
|
1,011
|
$
|
541
|
$
|
1,723
|
|||||
Provision
for charges incurred
|
—
|
(143
|
)
|
—
|
(143
|
)
|
|||||||
Payments
|
(171
|
)
|
(230
|
)
|
(484
|
)
|
(885
|
)
|
|||||
Balance
as of March 31, 2008
|
—
|
638
|
57
|
695
|
|||||||||
Provision
for charges incurred
|
—
|
—
|
(57
|
)
|
(57
|
)
|
|||||||
Payments
|
—
|
(121
|
)
|
—
|
(121
|
)
|
|||||||
Balance
as of June 30, 2008
|
—
|
517
|
—
|
517
|
|||||||||
Payments
|
—
|
(183
|
)
|
—
|
(183
|
)
|
|||||||
Balance
as of September 30, 2008
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
334
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
334
|
Accruals
related to restructuring activities are recorded in accrued liabilities in
the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
The
Company also recorded an assumed liability for expected involuntary employee
termination costs and facility closures in connection with the acquisition
of
Pemstar. Costs associated with restructuring activities related to a purchase
business combination are accounted for in accordance with Emerging Issue Task
Force Issue (EITF) No. 95-3, “Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a
Purchase Business Combination”. Accordingly, costs associated with such plans
are recorded as a liability assumed as of the consummation date of the purchase
business combination and included in the cost of the acquired entity. The
following table summarizes the provisions, the respective payments, activity
and
remaining accrued balance as of September 30, 2008 related to restructuring
costs recorded pursuant to EITF No. 95-3 during 2007:
Facility
|
Other
|
|||||||||
Lease
|
Exit
|
Total
|
||||||||
Costs
|
Costs
|
Costs
|
||||||||
Balance
as of December 31, 2007
|
$
|
808
|
$
|
1,617
|
$
|
2,425
|
||||
Payments
|
(160
|
)
|
(194
|
)
|
(354
|
)
|
||||
Non-cash
charges incurred
|
—
|
(452
|
)
|
(452
|
)
|
|||||
Foreign
exchange adjustments
|
40
|
69
|
109
|
|||||||
Balance
as of March 31, 2008
|
688
|
1,040
|
1,728
|
|||||||
Provision
for charges incurred
|
(1
|
)
|
(511
|
)
|
(512
|
)
|
||||
Payments
|
(2
|
)
|
(139
|
)
|
(141
|
)
|
||||
Foreign
exchange adjustments
|
(112
|
)
|
104
|
(8
|
)
|
|||||
Balance
as of June 30, 2008
|
573
|
494
|
1,067
|
|||||||
Foreign
exchange adjustments
|
(41
|
)
|
(36
|
)
|
(77
|
)
|
||||
Balance
as of September 30, 2008
|
$
|
532
|
$
|
458
|
$
|
990
|
18
In
addition, the Company recognized restructuring charges during 2008 related
to
reductions in workforce in certain facilities. These charges were recorded
pursuant to plans developed and approved by management. During the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recognized $0.3 million and
$0.9 million of employee termination costs associated with the involuntary
terminations of employees in connection with reductions in workforce of certain
facilities. As of September 30, 2008, the Company had paid these costs.
Note
13 - Share Repurchase
On
July
25, 2007, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the repurchase of
up to
$125 million
of the Company’s outstanding common shares. On July 21, 2008, the Company
completed the repurchase of 6.8 million of its common shares under the $125
million share repurchase program approved in July 2007. On July 24, 2008, the
Board of Directors of the Company approved the additional repurchase of up
to
$100 million of the Company’s outstanding common shares. Share purchases may be
made in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions or block
transactions, at the discretion of the Company’s management and as market
conditions warrant. Purchases will be funded from available cash and may be
commenced, suspended or discontinued at any time without prior notice. Shares
repurchased under the program will be retired.
During
the nine month period ending September 30, 2008, the Company repurchased a
total
of 5.2 million common shares for $87.1 million at an average price of $16.71
per
share.
Note
14 - Investments
Effective
January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS No. 157 with respect to financial
assets and liabilities only.
SFAS
No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value under generally accepted accounting principles and enhances disclosures
about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined under SFAS No. 157 as
the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer
a
liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for
the
asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on
the
measurement date. SFAS No. 157 establishes a hierarchy of inputs employed to
determine fair value measurements, with three levels. Level 1 inputs are quoted
prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
Level 2 inputs are observable prices that are not quoted on active exchanges,
such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in
markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are
observable or whose significant value drivers are observable. Level 3 inputs
are
unobservable inputs employed for measuring the fair value of assets or
liabilities. This hierarchy required the Company to use observable market data,
when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when determining
fair value.
As
of
September 30, 2008, $53.7 million (par value) of long-term investments were
recorded at fair value. The long-term investments consist of auction rate
securities that were reclassified from short-term during the three months ended
March 31, 2008, due to the overall changes that have occurred in the global
credit and capital markets that have led to failed auctions. These failed
auctions have impacted the liquidity of these investments and have resulted
in
our continuing to hold these securities beyond their typical auction reset
dates. The market for these types of securities remains illiquid as of September
30, 2008.
19
The
adoption of SFAS No. 157 impacted the calculation of fair value associated
with
the Company’s investments. The long-term investments, consisting of auction rate
securities, were valued using Level 2 inputs during the first and second
quarters of 2008. Due to the current global financial and credit crisis and
the
continued illiquidity of these securities, the Company has transferred these
securities from Level 2 to Level 3 as of September 30, 2008, as the assets
were
subject to valuation using significant unobservable inputs. The fair value
of
each security was estimated using a discounted cash flow model to calculate
the
present value of projected cash flows based on a number of factors including
the
security structure and terms, expected weighted average life and estimated
fail
rate coupon.
During
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recorded an
unrealized loss of $2.9 million and $5.8 million, respectively, on the
long-term investments. The Company has determined that this reduction in fair
value is temporary in nature, after considering factors including that the
decline in fair value originally occurred in the first quarter of 2008 as a
result of the market dislocations that caused the auction process to fail and
not because of any deterioration in the credit quality or actual performance
of
the underlying securities. Additional declines in value occurred in the third
quarter of 2008, as a result of widened credit spreads and the overall financial
market instability. The Company has the intent and ability to hold these
investments for a period of time sufficient to allow for the anticipated
recovery in the market value and management intends to hold each investment
until the earlier of its recovery or maturity. This unrealized loss reduced
the
fair value of the Company’s auction rate securities as of September 30, 2008 to
$47.9 million. These securities are classified as long-term investments due
to
the contractual maturity of the underlying securities being over ten years,
and
the cumulative unrealized loss is included as a component of other comprehensive
income within shareholders’ equity in the Company’s balance sheet. The following
table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of our
auction rate securities classified as long-term investments measured at fair
value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 under SFAS No.
157):
Balance
as of June 30, 2008
|
$
|
—
|
||
Transfers
into Level 3
|
55,484
|
|||
Net
unrealized losses included in other comprehensive income
(loss)
|
(2,852
|
)
|
||
Redemptions
of investments
|
(4,725
|
)
|
||
Balance
as of September 30, 2008
|
$
|
47,907
|
||
Unrealized
losses still held
|
$
|
5,786
|
As
of
September 30, 2008, there were no long-term investments measured at fair value
using Level 1 and Level 2 inputs.
20
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
References
in this report to “the Company,” “Benchmark,” “we,” or “us” mean Benchmark
Electronics, Inc. together with its subsidiaries. The following Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A
of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements are
identified as any statement that does not relate strictly to historical or
current facts. They use words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “plan,”
“projection,” “forecast,” “strategy,” “position,” “continue,” “estimate,”
“expect,” “may,” “will,” or the negative of those terms or other variations of
them or comparable terminology. In particular, statements, express or implied,
concerning future operating results or the ability to generate sales, income
or
cash flow are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not
guarantees of performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions,
including those discussed under Part II, Item 1A of this report. The future
results of our operations may differ materially from those expressed in these
forward-looking statements. Many of the factors that will determine these
results are beyond our ability to control or predict. Undue reliance should
not
be placed on any forward-looking statements. Should one or more of these risks
or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect,
actual outcomes may vary materially from those indicated.
The
following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto.
OVERVIEW
We
are in
the business of manufacturing electronics and provide our services to original
equipment manufacturers (OEMs) of computers and related products for business
enterprises, medical devices, industrial control equipment, testing and
instrumentation products, and telecommunication equipment. The services that
we
provide are commonly referred to as electronics manufacturing services (EMS).
We
offer our customers comprehensive and integrated design and manufacturing
services, from initial product design to volume production and direct order
fulfillment. Our manufacturing and assembly operations include printed circuit
boards and subsystem assembly, box build and systems integration, the process
of
integrating subsystems and, often, downloading and integrating software, to
produce a fully configured product. We also provide specialized engineering
services, including product design, printed circuit board layout, prototyping,
and test development. We believe that we have developed strengths in the
manufacturing process for large, complex, high-density printed circuit boards
as
well as the ability to manufacture high and low volume products in lower cost
regions such as Brazil, China, Malaysia, Mexico, Romania and
Thailand.
As
our
customers have continued to expand their globalization strategy during the
past
several years, we have made the necessary changes to align our business
operations with our customers’ demand. These changes include, among other
activities, moving production between facilities, reducing staff levels,
realigning our business processes and reorganizing our management. During the
three months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recognized $0.3 million
(pre-tax) of employee termination costs associated with the involuntary
terminations of employees in connection with reductions in workforce of certain
facilities. During the year ended December 31, 2007, we incurred $4.7 million
(pre-tax) of restructuring charges, primarily related to the closure of our
Redmond, Washington facility, the transfer of the Company’s printed circuit
board assembly (PCBA) operations in Dublin, Ireland to Brasov, Romania and
the
consolidation and resizing of certain other facilities, as we continued to
expand our low-cost capacity while realigning and further strengthening our
global footprint to support continued business opportunities. In connection
with
the acquisition of Pemstar Inc. (Pemstar) on January 8, 2007, a total of $7.0
million (pre-tax) in integration costs were incurred during the year ended
December 31, 2007. These costs included redundant operating costs that have
been eliminated.
21
We
believe that our global manufacturing presence increases our ability to be
responsive to our customers’ needs by providing accelerated time-to-market and
time-to-volume production of high quality products. These capabilities should
enable us to build stronger strategic relationships with our customers and
to
become a more integral part of their operations. Our customers face challenges
in planning, procuring and managing their inventories efficiently due to
customer demand fluctuations, product design changes, short product life cycles
and component price fluctuations. We employ production management systems to
manage their procurement and manufacturing processes in an efficient and
cost-effective manner so that, where possible, components arrive on a
just-in-time, as-and-when needed basis. We are a significant purchaser of
electronic components and other raw materials, and can capitalize on the
economies of scale associated with our relationships with suppliers to negotiate
price discounts, obtain components and other raw materials that are in short
supply, and return excess components. Our expertise in supply chain management
and our relationships with suppliers across the supply chain enables us to
reduce our customers’ cost of goods sold and inventory exposure.
We
recognize revenue from the sale of circuit board assemblies, systems and excess
inventory when the goods are shipped, title and risk of ownership have passed,
the price to the buyer is fixed and determinable and collectibility
is reasonably assured. Revenue from design, development and engineering services
is recognized when the services are performed and collectibility is reasonably
certain. Such services provided under fixed price contracts are accounted for
using the percentage of completion method. We assume no significant obligations
after product shipment as we typically warrant workmanship only. Therefore,
our
warranty provisions are immaterial.
Our
cost
of sales includes the cost of materials, electronic components and other
materials that comprise the products we manufacture, the cost of labor and
manufacturing overhead, and adjustments for excess and obsolete inventory.
Our
procurement of materials for production requires us to commit significant
working capital to our operations and to manage the purchasing, receiving,
inspection and stocking of materials. Although we bear the risk of fluctuations
in the cost of materials and excess scrap, we periodically negotiate cost of
materials adjustments with our customers. Our gross margin for any product
depends on the sales price, the proportionate mix of the cost of materials
in
the product and the cost of labor and manufacturing overhead allocated to the
product. We typically have the potential to realize higher gross margins on
products where the proportionate level of labor and manufacturing overhead
is
greater than that of materials. As we gain experience in manufacturing a
product, we usually achieve increased efficiencies, which result in lower labor
and manufacturing overhead costs for that product and higher gross
margins.
22
Summary
of Results
Sales
for
the three months ended September 30, 2008 decreased 5% to $641.7 million
compared to $672.6 million for the same period of 2007 primarily as a result
of
reduced corporate information technology spending. Sales to our largest
customer, Sun Microsystems, Inc., represented 14% of our sales in the third
quarter 2008 compared to 17% of our sales in the third quarter of 2007. Sales
to
this customer decreased $24.7 million from $117.2 million in the third quarter
of 2007 to $92.5 million in the third quarter of 2008. This decrease is
primarily attributable to a combination of reduced demand for certain maturing
products and partly due to the timing of certain product transitions. Recent
unfavorable economic conditions and uncertainty because of fluctuating
circumstances in the global financial markets is impacting businesses around
the
globe.
Our
gross
profit as a percentage of sales increased to 6.9% in the three months ended
September 30, 2008 from 5.8% in same period of 2007. This increase was primarily
due to the reduction of fixed costs (such as facility and personnel expenses)
from the same quarter in 2007. We experienced significantly lower sales volume
in the third quarter of 2007 compared to the second quarter of 2007 which
resulted in under absorbed fixed costs at that time. We do experience
fluctuations in gross profit from period to period. Comparing 2008 to 2007,
the
fluctuations were due primarily to changes in production levels, production
mix,
inventory levels, new program ramps, product crossovers and other factors.
Different programs can contribute different gross profits depending on factors
such as the types of services involved, location of production, size of the
program, complexity of the product, and level of material costs associated
with
the various products. New programs can contribute relatively less to our gross
profit in their early stages when manufacturing volumes are usually lower,
resulting in inefficiencies and unabsorbed manufacturing overhead costs. In
addition, new and higher volume programs remain subject to competitive
constraints that could exert downward pressure on our margins.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Management’s
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is
based upon our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. Our significant accounting policies are summarized
in
Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report
on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. The preparation of these
financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect
the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we
evaluate our estimates, including those related to allowance for doubtful
accounts, inventories, deferred taxes, impairment of long-lived assets, and
contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience
and
on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about
the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent
from
other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates. We believe the
following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments
and
estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial
statements.
23
Allowance
for doubtful accounts
Our
accounts receivable balance is recorded net of allowances for amounts not
expected to be collected from our customers. Because our accounts receivable
are
typically unsecured, we periodically evaluate the collectibility of our accounts
based on a combination of factors, including a particular customer’s ability to
pay as well as the age of the receivables. To evaluate a specific customer’s
ability to pay, we analyze financial statements, payment history, third-party
credit analysis reports and various information or disclosures by the customer
or other publicly available information. In cases where the evidence suggests
a
customer may not be able to satisfy its obligation to us, we set up a specific
allowance in an amount we determine appropriate for the perceived risk. If
the
financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an
impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be
required.
Inventory
valuation reserve
We
purchase inventory based on forecasted demand and record inventory at the lower
of cost or market. We reserve for estimated obsolescence as necessary in an
amount equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and estimated
market value based on assumptions of future demands and market conditions.
We
evaluate our inventory valuation on a quarterly basis based on current and
forecasted usage and the latest forecasts of product demand and production
requirements from our customers.
Customers frequently make changes to their forecasts, requiring us to make
changes to our inventory purchases, commitments, and production scheduling
and
may require us to cancel open purchase commitments with our vendors. This
process may lead to on-hand inventory quantities and on-order purchase
commitments that are in excess of our customer’s revised needs, or parts that
become obsolete before use in production. We record inventory reserves on excess
and obsolete inventory. These reserves are established on inventory which we
have determined that our customers are not responsible for or on inventory
that
we believe our customers are unable to fulfill their obligation to ultimately
purchase such inventory from us. If actual market conditions are less favorable
than those we projected, additional inventory write-downs may be
required.
Income
Taxes
We
estimate our income tax provision in each of the jurisdictions in which we
operate, including estimating exposures related to examinations by taxing
authorities. We must also make judgments regarding the ability to realize the
deferred tax assets. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred
tax
assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. While we
have
considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning
strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance, in the event
we
were to subsequently determine that we would be able to realize our deferred
tax
assets in excess of our net recorded amount, an adjustment to the valuation
allowance would increase income in the period such determination was made.
Similarly, should we determine that we would not be able to realize all or
part
of our net deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the valuation
allowance would reduce income in the period such determination was
made.
We
are
subject to examination by tax authorities for varying periods in various U.S.
and foreign tax jurisdictions. During the course of such examinations disputes
occur as to matters of fact and/or law. Also, in most tax jurisdictions the
passage of time without examination will result in the expiration of applicable
statutes of limitations thereby precluding the taxing authority from conducting
an examination of the tax period(s) for which such statute of limitations has
expired. We believe that we have adequately provided for our tax
liabilities.
24
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
In
accordance with SFAS No. 144, long-lived assets, such as property, plant,
and equipment, and purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed
for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The recoverability of assets
to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an
asset to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated
by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated
undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment charge would be recognized by
the
amount that the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the
asset.
Goodwill
and intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives are tested annually
for
impairment, and are tested for impairment more frequently if events and
circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. An impairment loss
would be recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the asset’s
fair value. We completed the annual impairment test during the fourth quarter
of
2007 and determined that no impairment existed as of the date of the impairment
test. Goodwill and intangible assets are measured at the reporting unit level,
which we have determined to be consistent with our operating segments as defined
in Note 8 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of this
report, by determining the fair values of the reporting units using a discounted
cash flow model and comparing those fair values to the carrying values,
including goodwill, of the reporting unit. As of September 30, 2008, we had
net
goodwill of approximately $283.2 million. Circumstances that may lead to
impairment of goodwill include unforeseen decreases in future performance or
industry demand, and the restructuring of our operations as a result of a change
in our business strategy.
Stock-Based
Compensation
In
accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004) and the
Security and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (SAB
107), we began recognizing stock-based compensation expense in our consolidated
statement of
income
on January 1, 2006. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Option pricing
models require the input of subjective assumptions, including the expected
life
of the option and the expected stock price volatility. Judgment is also required
in estimating the number of option awards that are expected to vest as a result
of satisfaction of time-based vesting schedules. If actual results or future
changes in estimates differ significantly from our current estimates,
stock-based compensation could increase or decrease. See Note 2 to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of this report.
Recently
Enacted Accounting Principles
See
Note
11 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of
recently enacted accounting principles.
25
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The
following table presents the percentage relationship that certain items in
our
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income bear to sales for the periods
indicated. The financial information and the discussion below should be read
in
conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes
thereto in Item 1 of this report.
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Sales
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
100.0
|
%
|
|||||
Cost
of sales
|
93.1
|
94.2
|
93.3
|
93.2
|
|||||||||
Gross
profit
|
6.9
|
5.8
|
6.7
|
6.8
|
|||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
3.3
|
3.3
|
3.3
|
3.2
|
|||||||||
Amortization
of intangibles
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
0.1
|
|||||||||
Restructuring
charges
|
0.0
|
0.2
|
0.0
|
0.3
|
|||||||||
Income
from operations
|
3.5
|
2.2
|
3.3
|
3.2
|
|||||||||
Other
income, net
|
0.1
|
0.5
|
0.4
|
0.3
|
|||||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
3.6
|
2.7
|
3.7
|
3.5
|
|||||||||
Income
tax benefit (expense)
|
0.2
|
0.6
|
(0.3
|
)
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
3.7
|
%
|
3.3
|
%
|
3.4
|
%
|
3.3
|
%
|
Sales
Sales
for
the third quarter of 2008 were $641.7 million, a 5% decrease from sales of
$672.6 million for the same quarter in 2007. Sales for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 were $2.0 billion, an 8% decrease from sales of
$2.2 billion for the same period in 2007. The decrease in sales is
primarily a result of reduced corporate information technology spending. The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the percentages of our
sales by industry sector.
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
Computers
& related products for business
|
|||||||||||||
enterprises
|
45
|
%
|
51
|
%
|
48
|
%
|
52
|
%
|
|||||
Telecommunication
equipment
|
20
|
16
|
18
|
15
|
|||||||||
Industrial
control equipment
|
17
|
15
|
16
|
13
|
|||||||||
Medical
devices
|
15
|
12
|
14
|
13
|
|||||||||
Testing
& instrumentation products
|
3
|
6
|
4
|
7
|
|||||||||
100
|
%
|
100
|
%
|
100
|
%
|
100
|
%
|
A
substantial percentage of our sales have been made to a small number of
customers, and the loss of a major customer, if not replaced, would adversely
affect us. Sales to our largest customer decreased $24.7 million from $117.2
million in the third quarter of 2007 to $92.5 million in the third quarter
of 2008. Sales to our largest customer decreased $157.7 million from $490.5
million in the first nine months of 2007 to $332.8 million in the first
nine months of 2008. This decrease is primarily attributable to a combination
of
reduced demand for certain maturing products and partly due to the timing of
certain product transitions. Our future sales are dependent on the success
of
our customers, some of which operate in businesses associated with rapid
technological change and consequent product obsolescence. Developments adverse
to our major customers or their products, or the failure of a major customer
to
pay for components or services, could have an adverse effect on us. Recent
unfavorable economic conditions and uncertainty because of fluctuating
circumstances in the global financial markets is impacting businesses around
the
globe.
26
Our
international operations are subject to the risks of doing business abroad.
These risks have not had a material adverse effect on our results of operations
through September 30, 2008. However, we can make no assurances that there will
not be an adverse impact in the future. See Part II, Item 1A for factors
pertaining to our international sales and fluctuations in the exchange rates
of
foreign currency and for further discussion of potential adverse effects in
operating results associated with the risks of doing business abroad. During
the
first nine months of 2008 and 2007, 49% and 42%, respectively, of our sales
were
from our international operations.
Gross
Profit
Gross
profit was $44.3 million, or 6.9% of sales, for the three months ended September
30, 2008 compared to $38.8 million, or 5.8% of sales, in the same period of
2007. This increase was primarily due to the reduction of fixed costs (such
as
facility and personnel expenses) from the same quarter in 2007. We experienced
significantly lower sales volume in the third quarter of 2007 compared to the
second quarter of 2007 which resulted in under absorbed fixed costs at that
time.
Gross
profit was $135.5 million, or 6.7% of sales, for the nine months ended September
30, 2008 compared to $147.8 million, or 6.8% of sales, in the same period of
2007. This decrease was primarily due to the overall decrease in sales volumes
when comparing the nine month periods.
We
do
experience fluctuations in gross profit from period to period. Comparing 2008
to
2007, the fluctuations were due primarily to changes in production levels,
production mix, inventory levels, new program ramps, product crossovers and
other factors. Different programs can contribute different gross profits
depending on factors such as the types of services involved, location of
production, size of the program, complexity of the product, and level of
material costs associated with the various products. New programs can contribute
relatively less to our gross profit in their early stages when manufacturing
volumes are usually lower, resulting in inefficiencies and unabsorbed
manufacturing overhead costs. In addition, new and higher volume programs remain
subject to competitive constraints that could exert downward pressure on our
margins.
27
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
Selling,
general and administrative expenses decreased 3%
to
$21.3 million in the third quarter of 2008 from $22.0 million in the third
quarter of 2007 and decreased 3% to $67.3 million in the first nine months
of
2008 from $69.5 million in the first nine months of 2007. The decrease in
selling, general and administrative expenses is primarily due to reduced
overhead resulting from cost controls and lower variable compensation and
employee related expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses, as
a
percentage of sales, were 3.3% and 3.3%, respectively, for the third quarter
of
2008 and 2007, and 3.3% and 3.2%, respectively, for the first nine months of
2008 and 2007.
Restructuring
Charges and Integration Costs
We
recognized $0.3 million in restructuring charges during each of the third
quarter and the first nine months of 2008, and $1.5 million and $7.0 million
in
restructuring charges and integration costs during the third quarter and during
the first nine months of 2007, respectively, related to reductions in workforce
and the re-sizing and closure of certain facilities and the integration of
the
facilities acquired from Pemstar. In connection with these activities, we
recorded restructuring charges for employee termination costs and other
restructuring and integration related costs.
The
recognition of the restructuring charges requires that we make certain judgments
and estimates regarding the nature, timing and amount of costs associated with
the planned exit activity. To the extent our actual results in exiting these
facilities differ from our estimates and assumptions, we may be required to
revise the estimates of future liabilities, requiring the recognition of
additional restructuring charges or the reduction of liabilities already
recognized. At the end of each reporting period, we evaluate the remaining
accrued balances to ensure that no excess accruals are retained and the
utilization of the provisions are for their intended purpose in accordance
with
developed exit plans. See Note 12 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements in Item 1 of this report.
Interest
Income
Interest
income for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $6.9
million and $7.6 million, respectively. The decrease is due to lower
market rates of interest earned on our interest-bearing accounts and
investments.
Interest
Expense
Interest
expense for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $1.1
million and $1.8 million, respectively. The decrease is due to the repayment
of
the debt assumed in the acquisition of Pemstar in 2007. See Note 5 to the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of this
report.
28
Income
Tax Expense
Income
tax expense of $5.1
million
represented an effective tax rate of 6.8% for the nine months ended September
30, 2008, compared with $4.9 million at an effective tax rate of 6.3% for the
same period in 2007. The increase in the effective tax rate is primarily due
to
tax benefits recorded in both periods for which the benefit in 2007 was larger
than the benefit in 2008. In 2007, we recorded a benefit related to a previously
closed facility that generated a worthless stock deduction of $6.5 million
recorded in the third quarter of 2007, compared to $3.4 million recorded in
2008. Excluding these tax benefits, the effective tax rate was 11.5% in 2008
compared with 14.7% in 2007. The decrease is a result of an increase in the
percentage of pre-tax income earned in foreign locations in the first nine
months of 2008 as compared to the first nine months of 2007. See Note 7 to
the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of this
report.
Net
Income
We
reported net
income
of approximately $69.0 million, or diluted earnings per share of $1.01 for
the first nine months of 2008, compared with net income of approximately $72.4
million, or diluted earnings per share of $0.99 for the same period of 2007.
The
net decrease of $3.4 million from 2007 was primarily due to the factors
discussed above.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We
have
historically financed our growth and operations through funds generated from
operations, proceeds from the sale and maturity of our investments and funds
borrowed under our credit facilities. Cash and cash equivalents increased to
$341.4 million at September 30, 2008 from $199.2 million at December 31,
2007.
Cash
provided by operating activities was $124.8 million in 2008. The cash provided
by operations during 2008 consisted primarily of $69.0 million of net income
adjusted for $30.3 million of depreciation and amortization, a $69.5
million decrease in accounts receivable, and a $23.1 million decrease in prepaid
expenses and other assets, offset by a $1.9 million increase in inventories
and
a $69.1 million decrease in accounts payable. Working capital was $822.0 million
at September 30, 2008 and $884.2 million at December 31, 2007. As of September
30, 2008, the $47.9 million of long-term investments consist of auction rate
securities that were reclassified to long-term during the three months ended
March 31, 2008, due to the overall changes that have occurred in the global
credit and capital markets that have led to failed auctions. These failed
auctions have impacted the liquidity of these investments and have resulted
in
our continuing to hold these securities beyond their typical auction reset
dates. The decrease in working capital during 2008 is primarily a result of
this
reclassification from short-term to long-term investments, in addition to other
items.
We
are
continuing the practice of purchasing components only after customer orders
are
received, which mitigates, but does not eliminate the risk of loss on
inventories. Supplies of electronic components and other materials used in
operations are subject to industry-wide shortages. In certain instances,
suppliers may allocate available quantities to us. We did not experience
shortages of electronic components and other material supplies during the
reporting period. If shortages of these components and other material supplies
used in operations occur, vendors may not ship the quantities we need for
production and we may be forced to delay shipments, which would increase
backorders.
29
Cash
provided by investing activities was $104.3 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 primarily due to the sales and maturities of investments
offset by additional purchases of property, plant and equipment and investments.
Capital expenditures of $25.0 million were primarily concentrated in
manufacturing production equipment in Asia to support our ongoing business
and
to expand certain existing manufacturing operations.
Cash
used
in financing activities was $84.5 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2008. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, share repurchases
totaled $87.1 million. During 2008, we received $2.8 million from the exercise
of stock options and $0.5 million in federal tax benefits of stock options
exercised. Principal payments of long-term debt and capital lease obligations
were $0.5 million in 2008.
Under
the
terms of a Credit Agreement (the Credit Agreement), we have a $100.0 million
five-year revolving credit facility
for
general corporate purposes with a maturity date of December 21, 2012. The Credit
Agreement includes an accordion feature under which total commitments under
the
facility may be increased by an additional $100 million, subject to satisfaction
of certain conditions. Interest on outstanding borrowings under the Credit
Agreement is payable quarterly, at our option, at LIBOR plus 0.75% to 1.75%
or a
prime rate plus 0.00% to 0.25%, based upon our debt ratio as specified in the
Credit Agreement. A commitment fee of 0.15% to 0.35% per annum (based upon
our
debt ratio) on the unused portion of the revolving credit line is payable
quarterly in arrears. As of September 30, 2008, we had no borrowings outstanding
under the Credit Agreement, $1.0 million letters of credit outstanding and
$99.0 million was available for future borrowings.
The
Credit Agreement is secured by our domestic inventory and accounts receivable,
100% of the stock of our domestic subsidiaries, and 65% of the voting capital
stock of each direct foreign subsidiary and substantially all of our and our
domestic subsidiaries’ other tangible and intangible assets. The Credit
Agreement contains customary financial covenants as to working capital, debt
leverage, fixed charges, and consolidated net worth, and restricts our ability
to incur additional debt, pay dividends, sell assets and to merge or consolidate
with other persons. As of September 30, 2008, we were in compliance with
all such covenants and restrictions.
Our
Thailand subsidiary has a credit agreement with Kasikornbank Public Company
(the
Thai Credit Agreement). The Thai Credit Agreement provides that the lender
will
make available to our Thailand subsidiary up to approximately $16 million
in revolving loans and machinery loans. The Thai Credit Agreement is secured
by
land, buildings and machinery in Thailand. In addition, the Thai Credit
Agreement provides for approximately $1.8 million (62 million Thai baht) in
working capital availability in the form of working capital loans (10 million
Thai baht) and bank guarantees (52 million Thai baht). Availability of funds
under the Thai Credit Agreement is reviewed annually and is currently accessible
through September 2009. As of September 30, 2008, our Thailand subsidiary had
no
working capital borrowings outstanding.
Our
operations, and the operations of businesses we acquire, are subject to certain
foreign, federal, state and local regulatory requirements relating to
environmental, waste management, health and safety matters. We believe we
operate in substantial compliance with all applicable requirements and we seek
to ensure that newly acquired businesses comply or will comply substantially
with applicable requirements. To date, the costs of compliance and workplace
and
environmental remediation have not been material to us. However, material costs
and liabilities may arise from these requirements or from new, modified or
more
stringent requirements in the future. In addition, our past, current and future
operations, and the operations of businesses we have or may acquire, may give
rise to claims of exposure by employees or the public, or to other claims or
liabilities relating to environmental, waste management or health and safety
concerns.
30
As
of
September 30, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents totaling $341.4 million
and
$99.0 million available for borrowings under our revolving credit line. We
believe that during the next twelve months, our capital expenditures will be
approximately $35 to $40 million, principally for machinery and equipment to
support our ongoing business around the globe, in addition to our planned
expansion in Asia, primarily a new building in China. On July 21, 2008, the
Company completed the repurchase of 6.8 million shares under the $125 million
share repurchase program approved in July 2007. On July 24, 2008, our Board
of
Directors approved the additional repurchase of up to $100 million of our
outstanding common shares. We are under no commitment or obligation to
repurchase any particular amount of common shares and share purchases may be
suspended at any time at management’s discretion. Management believes that our
existing cash balances and funds generated from operations will be sufficient
to
permit us to meet our liquidity requirements over the next twelve months.
Management further believes that our ongoing cash flows from operations and
any
borrowings we may incur under our credit facilities will enable us to meet
operating cash requirements in future years. Should we desire to consummate
significant acquisition opportunities, our capital needs would increase and
could possibly result in our need to increase available borrowings under our
revolving credit facility or access public or private debt and equity markets.
There can be no assurance, however, that we would be successful in raising
additional debt or equity on terms that we would consider
acceptable.
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS
We
have
certain
contractual obligations for operating leases that were summarized in a table
of
Contractual Obligations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007. There have been no material changes to our contractual
obligations, outside of the ordinary course of our business, since
December 31, 2007.
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
As
of
September 30, 2008, we did not have any significant off-balance sheet
arrangements.
31
Item
3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
Our
international sales are a significant portion of our net sales; we are exposed
to risks associated with operating internationally, including the
following:
• |
Foreign
currency exchange risk;
|
• |
Import
and export duties, taxes and regulatory
changes;
|
• |
Inflationary
economies or currencies; and
|
• |
Economic
and political instability.
|
We
do not
use derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. As of September
30, 2008, we did not have any foreign currency hedges. In the future,
significant transactions involving our international operations may cause us
to
consider engaging in hedging transactions to attempt to mitigate our exposure
to
fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. These exposures are primarily, but
not
limited to, vendor payments and inter-company balances in currencies other
than
the currency in which our foreign operations primarily generate and expend
cash.
Our international operations in some instances operate in a natural hedge
because both operating expenses and a portion of sales are denominated in local
currency. Our sales are substantially denominated in U.S. dollars. Our foreign
currency cash flows are generated in certain Asian and European countries,
Mexico and Brazil.
We
are
also exposed to market risk for changes in interest rates, a portion of which
relates to our investment portfolio. We do not use derivative financial
instruments in our investment portfolio. We place cash and cash equivalents
and
investments with various major financial institutions. We protect our invested
principal funds by limiting default risk, market risk and reinvestment risk.
We
mitigate default risk by generally investing in investment grade securities.
As
of September 30, 2008, the outstanding amount in the long-term investment
portfolio included $47.9 million of auction rate securities with an average
return of approximately 3.7%.
Item
4-
Controls and Procedures
Our
management has evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer
(CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end
of
the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based upon such
evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that
information required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed or submitted
by
us under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within
the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and
forms, and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by us in such reports is accumulated and communicated
to management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
There
have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the fiscal period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
32
Our
management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our disclosure
controls and internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control
system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable,
not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.
Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are
resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative
to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems,
no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues
and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been detected. These
inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making
can
be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.
Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some
persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the
control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain
assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance
that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential
future conditions; over time, a control may become inadequate because of changes
in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures
may
deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control
system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be
detected.
Exhibits
31.1 and 31.2 are the Certifications of the CEO and the CFO, respectively.
The
Certifications are required in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (the “Section 302 Certifications”). This Item is the information
concerning the Evaluation referred to in the Section 302 Certifications and
this
information should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 Certifications
for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.
PART
II—OTHER INFORMATION
We
are
involved in various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business.
In
the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not
have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results
of operations.
You
should carefully consider the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A in
the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007 in addition to the other information set forth in this report (including
the risk factors identified below).
The
recent unfavorable economic conditions and uncertainty because of fluctuating
circumstances in the global financial markets is impacting businesses around
the
globe. Unfavorable changes in economic conditions, including inflation,
recession, or other changes in economic conditions may result in lower
information technology spending by businesses, which could in turn affect demand
for our customers’ products and thus adversely affect our sales. Certain of our
customers may face challenges gaining timely access to sufficient credit, which
could result in an impairment of their ability to make timely payments to us.
If
that were to occur, we may be required to increase our allowance for doubtful
accounts and our days sales outstanding would be negatively impacted.
Additionally, the current market turbulence may also impact our critical
suppliers causing them to be unable to supply, in a timely manner, sufficient
quantities of customized components ordered by us, thereby impairing our ability
to manufacture on schedule and at commercially reasonable costs.
33
(b)
The
following table provides information about the Company repurchases of its equity
securities that are registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act during
the quarter ended September 30, 2008, at a total cost of $20.4
million:
ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|||||||||||||
(d)
Maximum
|
|||||||||||||
(c)
Total
|
Number
(or
|
||||||||||||
Number
of
|
Approximate
|
||||||||||||
Shares
(or
|
Dollar
Value)
|
||||||||||||
Units)
|
of
Shares (or
|
||||||||||||
Purchased
as
|
Units)
that
|
||||||||||||
(a)
Total
|
Part
of
|
May
Yet Be
|
|||||||||||
Number
of
|
(b)
Average
|
Publicly
|
Purchased
|
||||||||||
Shares
(or
|
Price
Paid per
|
Announced
|
Under
the
|
||||||||||
Units)
|
Share
(or
|
Plans
or
|
Plans
or
|
||||||||||
Period
|
Purchased
(1)
|
Unit)(2)
|
Programs
|
Programs
(3)
|
|||||||||
July
1 to 24, 2008
|
324,700
|
$
|
16.57
|
324,700
|
—
|
||||||||
July
28 to 31, 2008
|
80,900
|
$
|
14.36
|
80,900
|
$
|
98.8
million
|
|||||||
August
1 to 31, 2008
|
488,300
|
$
|
15.17
|
488,300
|
$
|
91.4
million
|
|||||||
September
1 to 30, 2008
|
419,100
|
$
|
15.38
|
419,100
|
$
|
85.0
million
|
|||||||
Total
|
1,313,000
|
$
|
15.53
|
1,313,000
|
(1)
All
share repurchases were made on the open market.
(2)
Average
price paid per share is calculated on a settlement basis and excludes
commission.
(3)
On
July
25, 2007, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the repurchase of
up to
$125 million of the Company’s outstanding common shares. On July 24, 2008, the
Company completed the repurchase of 6.8 million of its common shares under
the
$125 million share repurchase program approved in July 2007. On July 24, 2008,
the Board of Directors of the Company approved the additional repurchase of
up
to $100 million of the Company’s outstanding common shares. Purchases under the
plan commenced on July 28, 2008. Share purchases may be made in the open market,
in privately negotiated transactions or block transactions, at the discretion
of
the Company’s management and as market conditions warrant. Purchases will be
funded from available cash and may be commenced, suspended or discontinued
at
any time without prior notice. Shares repurchased under the program will be
retired.
During
the period from July 1 to September 30, 2008, the Company repurchased a total
of
1,313,000 common shares for $20.4 million at an average price of $15.53 per
share. All share purchases were made in the open market and the shares
repurchased through September 30, 2008 were retired.
34
None
31.1 |
Section
302 Certification of Chief Executive
Officer
|
31.2
|
Section
302 Certification of Chief
Financial Officer
|
32.1
|
Section
1350 Certification
of Chief Executive Officer
|
32.2
|
Section
1350 Certification
of Chief Financial Officer
|
35
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized on November 7, 2008.
BENCHMARK
ELECTRONICS, INC.
(Registrant)
|
||
|
|
|
By: | /s/ Cary T. Fu | |
Cary
T. Fu
Chief
Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
By: | /s/ Donald F. Adam | |
Donald
F. Adam
Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial Officer)
|
36
Exhibit
Number
|
Description of Exhibit |
31.1 |
Section
302 Certification
of Chief Executive Officer
|
31.2 |
Section
302 Certification
of Chief Financial Officer
|
32.1 |
Section
1350 Certification of Chief Executive
Officer
|
32.2 |
Section
1350 Certification of Chief Financial
Officer
|
37