Bergio International, Inc. - Annual Report: 2017 (Form 10-K)

[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2017

[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File No. 333-150029

BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

 (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:   (973) 227-3230

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $0.00001

Indicate by checkmark if registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by checkmark if registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by checkmark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.   [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [  ]    Accelerated filer [  ]    Non-accelerated filer [  ]    Smaller reporting company [X]

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Act).  Yes [  ] No [X]

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock (par value $0.00001 per share) held by non-affiliates on June 30, 2017 (the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was $462,204 using the closing price on June 30, 2017.

As of April 20, 2018, the registrant had 4,852,047,395 shares of common stock, par value $0.00001 per share, outstanding.

Documents Incorporated By Reference:  None.

Table of Contents

BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Table of Contents

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are “forward-looking” statements, as well as historical information. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including matters described in the section titled “Risk Factors.” Forward-looking statements include those that use forward-looking terminology, such as the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “project,” “plan,” “will,” “shall,” “should,” and similar expressions, including when used in the negative. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable and achievable, these statements involve risks and uncertainties and we cannot assure you that actual results will be consistent with these forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ from these forward-looking statements include the following:

•

the availability and adequacy of our cash flow to meet our requirements;

•

economic, competitive, demographic, business and other conditions in our local and regional markets;

•

changes in our business and growth strategy;

•

changes or developments in laws, regulations or taxes in the entertainment industry;

•

actions taken or not taken by third-parties, including our contractors and competitors;

•

the availability of additional capital; and

•

other factors discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report.

All forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by these and other factors.  We undertake no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements, whether to reflect events or circumstances after the date initially filed or published, to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or otherwise unless required by applicable law.

Table of Contents

PART I

Table of Contents

Our product range is divided into three fashion lines: (i) an 18K gold line, (ii) a bridal line, and (iii) a couture and/or one of kind pieces. Our Chief Executive Officer and director, Mr. Abajian, consults regularly with the design teams to design and create new products and product lines. Typically, new products come on line approximately every year and most recently, Bergio collections include Byzantine, Cestino, and Safari Collections, which consist of approximately 35 pieces made with pink gold and diamonds. Our offerings also include the Sistina and Rocca Collections. Depending on the timing and styling at any point in time, our products and collections would fall in one of the various categories shown below:

1.

Whimsical. The whimsical line includes charms, crosses and other “add-on” pieces.

2.

Fine. The proposed middle line will consist of fashion jewelry utilizing colored stones, diamonds and pearls applied to a variety of applications such as necklaces, pendants, earrings, bracelets and rings. The metals that we intend to use for the Middle line include platinum, 18K white & yellow gold.

3.

Couture. The Couture line is our most luxurious line, and consists of one-of-a-kind pieces, new showcase products each year, and predominantly utilizes diamonds, platinum and other precious metals and stones of the highest grade and quality available.

4.

Bridal. The Bridal line is our core business. We attempt to stay on the forefront of trends and designs in the bridal market with the latest in wedding sets, engagement rings and wedding bands for both men and women.

Each year, we attempt to expand and/or enhance these lines, while constantly seeking to identify trends that we believe exist in the market for new styles or types of merchandise. Design and innovation are the primary focus of our manufacturing and we are less concerned with the supply and capacity of raw materials. Mr. Abajian with his contacts, which are located mostly overseas, regularly meets to discuss, conceptualize and develop Bergio’s various products and collections. When necessary, additional suppliers and design teams can be brought in as needed. Management intends to maintain a diverse line of jewelry to mitigate concentration of sales and continuously expand our market reach.

Competition and Market Overview

The jewelry design and manufacture industry is extremely competitive and has low barriers to entry. We compete with other jewelry designers and manufacturers of upscale jewelry as well as retail jewelry stores. There are over 2,500 jewelry design and manufacture companies worldwide, several of which have greater experience, brand name recognition and financial resources than Bergio.

Our management believes that the jewelry industry competes in the global marketplace and therefore must be adaptable to remain competitive. Recently the U.S. economy has encountered a slowdown and Bergio anticipates the U.S. economy will most likely remain weak at least through the end of 2017. Consumer spending for discretionary goods such as jewelry is sensitive to changes in consumer confidence and ultimately consumer confidence is affected by general business considerations in the U.S. economy. Consumer discretionary spending generally declines during times of falling consumer confidence, which may affect the retail sale of our products. U.S. consumer confidence reflected these slowing conditions throughout the last few years. The impact of the slowing U.S. economy is not usually known until the third quarter of any given year in our industry, thus it is hard to estimate the actual impact the slowing economy will have on our business.

We believe that a stronger economy, more spending by young professionals with an overall trend toward luxury products will lead to future growth. Therefore, we intend to make strong efforts to maintain our brand in the industry through our focus on the innovation and design of our products as well as being able to consolidate and increase cost efficiency when possible through acquisitions.

2

Table of Contents

Marketing and Distribution

We have historically sold our products directly to distributors, retailers and other wholesalers, who then in turn sell their products to consumers through retail stores. Independent retail jewelers that offer the current Bergio line are not under formal contracts and most sell competing products as well.

We currently sell our jewelry to approximately 50 independent jewelry retailers across the United States, and have spent over $3 million in branding the Bergio name through tradeshows, trade advertising, national advertising and billboard advertising since launching the line in 1995. Our products consist of a wide range of unique styles and designs made from precious metals such as, gold, platinum, and Karat gold, as well as diamonds and other precious stones. We have manufacturing control over our line as a result of having a manufacturing facility in New Jersey as well as subcontracts with facilities in Italy.

Customers

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company had one customer that accounted for 9% of total sales. No other no single customer accounted for over 5% or more of our annual sales. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company had no single customer that accounted for over 5% or more of our annual sales.

As of December 31, 2017 accounts receivable, net amounted to only $61,511 and no one customer represented 93% significant amount of this balance. This amount was collected in the first quarter of 2018. As of December 31, 2016 accounts receivable, net amounted to only $5,594 and no one customer represented a significant amount of this balance.

All of our sales are generated from our customer base of 50 customers.

Sources and Availability of Raw Materials and Principal Suppliers

Most of the inventory and raw materials we purchase occurs through our manufacturers located in Europe. The inventory that we directly maintain is based on recent sales and revenues of our products but ultimately is at the discretion of Mr. Abajian, and his experience in the industry. Our inventories are commodities that can be incorporated into future products or can be sold on the open market. Additionally, we perform physical inventory inspections on a quarterly basis to assess upcoming styling needs and consider the current pricing in metals and stones needed for our products.

We acquire all raw gemstones, precious metals and other raw materials used for manufacturing our products on the open market. We are not constrained in our purchasing by any contracts with any suppliers and acquire raw material based upon, among other things, availability and price on the open wholesale market.

Product for U.S. consumption is now produced in our facility in Fairfield, New Jersey and 5% is contracted to our manufacturing supplier in Italy, who procures the raw materials in accordance with the specifications and designs submitted by Bergio. In Russia, our contract manufacturer procures all the materials.  However, the general supply of precious metals and stones used by us can be reasonably forecast even though the prices will fluctuate. Any price differentials in the precious metals and stones will typically be passed on to the customer.

For the raw materials not procured by contracted manufacturers, we have approximately five suppliers that compete for our business, with our largest gold suppliers being ASD Casting Inc. Most of our precious stones are purchased from various diamond dealers. We do not have any formal agreements with any of our suppliers but have established an ongoing relationship with each of our suppliers.

3

Table of Contents

Intellectual Property

Bergio is a federally registered trademarked name that we own. Since the first trademark of “Bergio” was filed, all advertising, marketing, trade shows and overall presentation of our product to the public has prominently displayed this trademark.  As additional lines are designed and added to our products, we may trademark new names to distinguish particular products and jewelry lines.

Research and Development

There were no expenses incurred for research and development in 2017 and 2016.

Employees

As of April 20, 2018, we had 2 full-time employees and 1 part-time employees. Our current employees are sales and marketing personnel.  No personnel are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We use the services of independent consultants and contractors from time to time when needed.

Environmental Regulation and Compliance

The United States environmental laws do not materially impact our manufacturing as we are using state of the art equipment that complies with all relevant environmental laws.

Approximately 5% of the Company’s manufacturing is contracted to quality suppliers in the vicinity of Valenza, Italy, with the remaining 95% of setting and finishing work being conducted in our Fairfield, New Jersey facility. The setting and finishing work done in our New Jersey facility involves the use of precision lasers, rather than using old soldering procedures which uses gas and oxygen to assemble different elements. Soap and water is used as a standard to clean the jewelry. Also, a standard polishing compound is used for the finishing work but it does not have a material impact on our cost and effect of compliance with environmental laws.

Government Regulation

Currently, we are subject to all of the government regulations that regulate businesses generally such as compliance with regulatory requirements of federal, state, and local agencies and authorities, including regulations concerning workplace safety, labor relations, and disadvantaged businesses. In addition, our operations are affected by federal and state laws relating to marketing practices in the retail jewelry industry. We are subject to the jurisdiction of federal, various state and other taxing authorities. From time to time, these taxing authorities review or audit our business.

Where You Can Find More Information

Our website address is www.bergio.com. We do not intend our website address to be an active link or to otherwise incorporate by reference the contents of the website into this Report. The public may read and copy any materials the Company files with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0030. The SEC maintains an Internet website (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

4

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

OUR FUTURE SUCCESS DEPENDS UPON, IN LARGE PART, OUR CONTINUING ABILITY TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN QUALIFIED PERSONNEL.

If we grow and implement our business plan, we will need to add managerial talent to support our business plan. There is no guarantee that we will be successful in adding such managerial talent. These professionals are regularly recruited by other companies and may choose to change companies. Given our relatively small size compared to some of our competitors, the performance of our business may be more adversely affected than our competitors would be if we lose well-performing employees and are unable to attract new ones.

BECAUSE WE INTEND TO ACQUIRE BUSINESSES AND SUCH ACTIVITY INVOLVES A NUMBER OF RISKS, OUR CORE BUSINESS MAY SUFFER.

We may consider acquisitions of assets or other business.  Any acquisition involves a number of risks that could fail to meet our expectations and adversely affect our profitability.  For example:

·

The acquired assets or business may not achieve expected results;

·

We may incur substantial, unanticipated costs, delays or other operational or financial problems when integrating the acquired assets;

·

We may not be able to retain key personnel of an acquired business;

·

Our management’s attention may be diverted; or

·

Our management may not be able to manage the acquired assets or combined entity effectively or to make acquisitions and grow our business internally at the same time.

If these problems arise we may not realize the expected benefits of an acquisition.

BECAUSE THE JEWELRY INDUSTRY IN GENERAL IS AFFECTED BY FLUCTUATIONS IN THE PRICES OF PRECIOUS METALS AND PRECIOUS AND SEMI-PRECIOUS STONES, WE COULD EXPERIENCE INCREASED OPERATING COSTS THAT WILL AFFECT OUR BOTTOM LINE.

The availability and prices of gold, diamonds, and other precious metals and precious and semi-precious stones may be influenced by cartels, political instability in exporting countries and inflation.

Shortages of these materials or sharp changes in their prices could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. A significant change in prices of key commodities, including gold, could adversely affect our business or reduce operating margins and impact consumer demand if retail prices increased significantly, even though we historically incorporate any increases in the purchase of raw materials to our consumers. Additionally, a significant disruption in our supply of gold or other commodities could decrease the production and shipping levels of our products, which may materially increase our operating costs and ultimately affect our profit margins.

BECAUSE WE DEPEND ON OUR ABILITY TO IDENTIFY AND RESPOND TO FASHION TRENDS, IF WE MISJUDGE THESE TRENDS, OUR ABILITY TO MAINTAIN AND GAIN MARKET SHARE WILL BE EFFECTED.

The jewelry industry is subject to rapidly changing fashion trends and shifting consumer demands. Accordingly, our success may depend on the priority that our target customers place on fashion and our ability to anticipate, identify, and capitalize upon emerging fashion trends. If we misjudge fashion trends or are unable to adjust our products in a timely manner, our net sales may decline or fail to meet expectations and any excess inventory may be sold at lower prices.

6

Table of Contents

OUR ABILITY TO MAINTAIN OR INCREASE OUR REVENUES COULD BE HARMED IF WE ARE UNABLE TO STRENGTHEN AND MAINTAIN OUR BRAND IMAGE.

We have spent significant amounts of time and money in branding our Bergio and Bergio Bridal lines. We believe that primary factors in determining customer buying decisions, especially in the jewelry industry, are determined by price, confidence in the merchandise and quality associated with a brand. The ability to differentiate products from competitors of the Company has been a factor in attracting consumers. However, if the Company’s ability to promote its brand fails to garner brand recognition, its ability to generate revenues may suffer. If the Company fails to differentiate its products, its ability to sell its products wholesale will be adversely affected. These factors could result in lower selling prices and sales volumes, which could adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations.

IF WE WERE TO EXPERIENCE SUBSTANTIAL DEFAULTS BY OUR CUSTOMERS ON ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, THIS COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR LIQUIDITY AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

If customers responsible for a large amount of accounts receivable were to become insolvent or otherwise unable to pay for our products, or to make payments in a timely manner, our liquidity and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. An economic or industry downturn could materially affect the ability to collect these accounts receivable, which could then result in longer payment cycles, increased collections costs and defaults in excess of management’s expectations. A significant deterioration in the ability to collect on accounts receivable could affect our cash flow and working capital position.

WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO INCREASE SALES OR OTHERWISE SUCCESSFULLY OPERATE OUR BUSINESS, WHICH COULD HAVE A SIGNIFICANT NEGATIVE IMPACT ON OUR FINANCIAL CONDITION.

We believe that the key to our success is to increase our revenues and available cash. We may not have the resources required to promote our business and its potential benefits. If we are unable to gain market acceptance of our business, we will not be able to generate enough revenue to achieve and maintain profitability or to continue our operations.

We may not be able to increase our sales or effectively operate our business. To the extent we are unable to achieve sales growth, we may continue to incur losses. We may not be successful or make progress in the growth and operation of our business. Our current and future expense levels are based on operating plans and estimates of future sales and revenues and are subject to increase as strategies are implemented. Even if our sales grow, we may be unable to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected revenue shortfall.

Further, if we substantially increase our operating expenses to increase sales and marketing, and such expenses are not subsequently followed by increased revenues, our operating performance and results would be adversely affected and, if sustained, could have a material adverse effect on our business. To the extent we implement cost reduction efforts to align our costs with revenue, our sales could be adversely affected.

WE MAY BE UNABLE TO MANAGE GROWTH, WHICH MAY IMPACT OUR POTENTIAL PROFITABILITY.

Successful implementation of our business strategy requires us to manage our growth. Growth could place an increasing strain on our management and financial resources. To manage growth effectively, we will need to:

·

Establish definitive business strategies, goals and objectives;

·

Maintain a system of management controls; and

·

Attract and retain qualified personnel, as well as, develop, train and manage management-level and other employees.

If we fail to manage our growth effectively, our business, financial condition or operating results could be materially harmed, and our stock price may decline.

7

Table of Contents

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

OUR COMMON STOCK IS CURRENTLY QUOTED ON THE OTC MARKETS (PINK SHEETS), WHICH MAY HAVE AN UNFAVORABLE IMPACT ON OUR STOCK PRICE AND LIQUIDITY.  

Our common stock is quoted on the Pink Sheets, an over-the-counter electronic quotation system maintained by the OTC Markets.  The quotation of our shares on the Pink Sheets may result in a less liquid market available for existing and potential stockholders to trade shares of our common stock, could depress the trading price of our common stock and could have a long-term adverse impact on our ability to raise capital in the future.

THERE IS LIMITED LIQUIDITY ON THE PINK SHEETS, WHICH ENCHANCES THE VOLATILE NATURE OF OUR EQUITY.  

When fewer shares of a security are being traded on the Pink Sheets, volatility of prices may increase and price movement may outpace the ability to deliver accurate quote information.  Due to lower trading volumes in shares of our common stock, there may be a lower likelihood that orders for shares of our common stock will be executed, and current prices may differ significantly from the price that was quoted at the time of entry of the order.

OUR COMMON STOCK IS CONSIDERED A “PENNY STOCK,” AND IS SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL SALE AND TRADING REGULATIONS THAT MAY MAKE IT MORE DIFFICULT TO SELL.

Our common stock is considered to be a “penny stock” since it does not qualify for one of the exemptions from the definition of “penny stock” under Section 3a51-1 of the Exchange Act. Our common stock is a “penny stock” because it meets one or more of the following conditions (i) the stock trades at a price less than $5.00 per share; (ii) it is not traded on a “recognized” national exchange; (iii) it is not quoted on the Nasdaq Stock Market, or even if so, has a price less than $5.00 per share; or (iv) is issued by a company that has been in business less than three years with net tangible assets less than $5 million.

The principal result or effect of being designated a “penny stock” is that securities broker-dealers participating in sales of our common stock will be subject to the “penny stock” regulations set forth in Rules 15-2 through 15g-9 promulgated under the Exchange Act. For example, Rule 15g-2 requires broker-dealers dealing in penny stocks to provide potential investors with a document disclosing the risks of penny stocks and to obtain a manually signed and dated written receipt of the document at least two business days before effecting any transaction in a penny stock for the investor’s account. Moreover, Rule 15g-9 requires broker-dealers in penny stocks to approve the account of any investor for transactions in such stocks before selling any penny stock to that investor.

This procedure requires the broker-dealer to (i) obtain from the investor information concerning his or her financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives; (ii) reasonably determine, based on that information, that transactions in penny stocks are suitable for the investor and that the investor has sufficient knowledge and experience as to be reasonably capable of evaluating the risks of penny stock transactions; (iii) provide the investor with a written statement setting forth the basis on which the broker-dealer made the determination in (ii) above; and (iv) receive a signed and dated copy of such statement from the investor, confirming that it accurately reflects the investor's financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives. Compliance with these requirements may make it more difficult and time consuming for holders of our common stock to resell their shares to third parties or to otherwise dispose of them in the market or otherwise.

8

Table of Contents

OUR CURRENT CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND SOLE DIRECTOR, MR. BERGE ABAJIAN HAS SUFFICIENT VOTING POWER TO CONTROL THE VOTE ON SUBSTANTIALLY ALL CORPORATE MATTERS.

Berge Abajian, our chief executive officer and sole director has sufficient voting power to control the vote on substantially all corporate matters.  Accordingly, Mr. Abajian will be able to determine the composition of our board of directors, will retain the effective voting power to approve all matters requiring shareholder approval, will prevail in matters requiring shareholder approval, including, in particular the election and removal of directors, and will continue to have significant influence over our business.  As a result of his ownership and position in the Company, Mr. Abajian is able to influence all matters requiring shareholder action, including significant corporate transactions.  

TRADING OF OUR STOCK MAY BE RESTRICTED BY THE U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION’S PENNY STOCK REGULATIONS, WHICH MAY LIMIT A STOCKHOLDER’S ABILITY TO BUY AND SELL OUR STOCK.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted regulations which generally define “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. Our securities are covered by the penny stock rules, which impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell to persons other than established customers and “accredited investors”.  The term “accredited investor” refers generally to institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document in a form prepared by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. The bid and offer quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer’s confirmation. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from these rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written agreement to the transaction. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market for the stock that is subject to these penny stock rules. Consequently, these penny stock rules may affect the ability of broker-dealers to trade our securities. We believe that the penny stock rules discourage investor interest in and limit the marketability of our common stock.

WE CURRENTLY HAVE A LIMITED ACCOUNTING STAFF, AND IF WE FAIL TO DEVELOP OR MAINTAIN AN EFFECTIVE SYSTEM OF INTERNAL CONTROLS, WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO REPORT OUR FINANCIAL RESULTS TIMELY AND ACCURATELY OR PREVENT FRAUD, WHICH WOULD LIKELY HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON THE MARKET PRICE OF OUR COMMON UNITS.

We are subject to the public reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”).  Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable and timely financial reports, prevent fraud and to operate successfully as a publicly traded partnership.

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting and principles generally accepted in the United States, but our internal accounting controls may not meet all standards applicable to companies with publicly traded securities.  Our efforts to develop and maintain our internal controls may not be successful, and we may be unable to maintain effective controls over our financial processes and reporting in the future or to comply with our obligations under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which we refer to as Section 404.  For example, Section 404 requires us, among other things, to annually review and report on, and our independent registered public accounting firm to attest to, the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting.  Based on management’s evaluation, as of December 31, 2017, our management concluded that we had several material weaknesses related to our internal controls over financial reporting (See Item 9A).

9

Table of Contents

THE MARKET PRICE FOR OUR COMMON SHARES IS PARTICULARLY VOLATILE GIVEN OUR STATUS AS A RELATIVELY UNKNOWN COMPANY WITH A SMALL AND THINLY TRADED PUBLIC FLOAT, LIMITED OPERATING HISTORY AND LACK OF PROFITS WHICH COULD LEAD TO WIDE FLUCTUATIONS IN OUR SHARE PRICE. YOU MAY BE UNABLE TO SELL YOUR COMMON SHARES AT OR ABOVE YOUR PURCHASE PRICE, WHICH MAY RESULT IN SUBSTANTIAL LOSSES TO YOU.

The market for our common shares is characterized by significant price volatility when compared to the shares of larger, more established companies that trade on a national securities exchange and have large public floats, and we expect that our share price will continue to be more volatile than the shares of such larger, more established companies for the indefinite future. The volatility in our share price is attributable to a number of factors. First, as noted above, our common shares are, compared to the shares of such larger, more established companies, sporadically and thinly traded. As a consequence of this limited liquidity, the trading of relatively small quantities of shares by our shareholders may disproportionately influence the price of those shares in either direction. The price for our shares could, for example, decline precipitously in the event that a large number of our common shares are sold on the market without commensurate demand. Secondly, we are a speculative or “risky” investment due to our limited operating history and lack of profits to date, and uncertainty of future market acceptance for our potential products. As a consequence of this enhanced risk, more risk-adverse investors may, under the fear of losing all or most of their investment in the event of negative news or lack of progress, be more inclined to sell their shares on the market more quickly and at greater discounts than would be the case with the stock of a larger, more established company that trades on a national securities exchange and has a large public float. Many of these factors are beyond our control and may decrease the market price of our common shares, regardless of our operating performance. We cannot make any predictions or projections as to what the prevailing market price for our common shares will be at any time, including as to whether our common shares will sustain their current market prices, or as to what effect that the sale of shares or the availability of common shares for sale at any time will have on the prevailing market price.

WE WILL INCUR INCREASED COSTS AS A RESULT OF BEING A PUBLIC COMPANY, WHICH COULD AFFECT OUR PROFITABILITY AND OPERATING RESULTS.

We voluntarily file annual, quarterly and current reports with the SEC. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”) and the rules subsequently implemented by the SEC and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board have imposed various requirements on public companies, including requiring changes in corporate governance practices. We expect these rules and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities of ours more time-consuming and costly. We expect to spend between $50,000 and $100,000 in legal and accounting expenses annually to comply with our SEC reporting obligations and Sarbanes-Oxley. These costs could affect profitability and our results of operations.

WE HAVE NOT PAID DIVIDENDS IN THE PAST AND DO NOT EXPECT TO PAY DIVIDENDS FOR THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE. ANY RETURN ON INVESTMENT MAY BE LIMITED TO THE VALUE OF OUR COMMON STOCK.

No cash dividends have been paid on the Company’s common stock. We expect that any income received from operations will be devoted to our future operations and growth. The Company does not expect to pay cash dividends in the near future. Payment of dividends would depend upon our profitability at the time, cash available for those dividends, and other factors as the Company’s board of directors may consider relevant. If the Company does not pay dividends, the Company’s common stock may be less valuable because a return on an investor’s investment will only occur if the Company’s stock price appreciates.

10

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

PART II

Table of Contents

2011 Incentive Stock and Award Plan

In May 2011, the board of directors (the “Board”) of the Company adopted the 2011 Incentive Stock and Award Plan (the “Plan”) which reserved for issuance up to 5,000 shares of its common stock.   The Plan, which has a term of ten years from the date of adoption, is administered by the Board or by a committee appointed by the Board. The selection of participants, allotment of shares, and other conditions related to the grant of options, to the extent not set forth in the Plan, and are determined by the Board.  

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

During the year ended December 31, 2017, we have issued the following securities  which were not registered under the Securities Act and not previously disclosed in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on From 10-Q or Current Reports on Form 8-K.  Unless otherwise indicated, all of the share issuances described below were made in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for transactions not involving a public offering:

1)

On March 22, 2017, we issued 90,005,478 shares of common stock valued at $4,951 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

2)

On March 22, 2017, we issued 183,000,000 shares of common stock valued at $12,244 to Illiad for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.

3)

On March 22, 2017, we issued 91,600,000 shares of common stock valued at $4,580 to JMJ Financial for conversion of its convertible debt.

4)

On May 12, 2017, we issued 60,000,000 shares of common stock valued at $6,000 to a firm for payment of accounts payable.

5)

On May 12, 2017, we issued 219,000,000 shares of common stock valued at $14,892 to Illiad for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.

6)

On June 30, 2017, we issued 107,871,146 shares of common stock valued at $5,394 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

7)

On October 1, 2017, we issued 210,000,000 shares of common stock valued at $21,000 to View Point Health Investments in exchange for consulting services.

8)

On October 4, 2017, we issued 107,871,146 shares of common stock valued at $6,935 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

9)

On October 10, 2017, we issued 92,457,600 shares of common stock valued at $6,935 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

10)

On October 3, 2017, we issued 258,500,000 shares of common stock valued at $17,568 to Illiad for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.

11)

On October 13, 2017, we issued 360.000.000 shares of common stock valued at $24,480 to Illiad for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.

12)

On October 3, 2017, we issued 129,000,000 shares of common stock valued at $6,450 to JMJ Financial for conversion of its convertible debt.

13)

On October 10, 2017, we issued 113,062,200 shares of common stock valued at $5,653 to JMJ Financial for conversion of its convertible debt.

14)

On October 11, 2017, we issued 159,444,444 shares of common stock valued at $14,350 to KBM Financial for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.

15)

On October 12, 2017, we issued 159,500,000 shares of common stock valued at $14,355 to KBM Financial for conversion of its convertible debt.

16)

On October 13, 2017, we issued 159,444.444 shares of common stock valued at $14,350 to KBM Financial for conversion of its convertible debt.

17)

On October 24, 2017, we issued 159,444.444 shares of common stock valued at $14,350 to KBM Financial for conversion of its convertible debt.

18)

On October 26, 2017, we issued 125,000,000 shares of common stock valued at $12,500 to a firm for payment of accounts payable.

Rule 10B-18 Transactions

During the year ended December 31, 2017, there were no repurchases of the Company’s common stock by the Company.

Table of Contents

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

The Company is a smaller reporting company as defined in Item 10 (f) of Regulation S-K and therefore is not required to provide the information under this item.

Table of Contents

Our products consist of a wide range of unique styles and designs made from precious metals such as, gold, platinum, and Karat gold, as well as diamonds and other precious stones. We currently design and produce approximately 100 to 150 product styles. Current retail prices for our products range from $400 to $200,000. We have manufacturing control over our line as a result of having a manufacturing facility in New Jersey as well as subcontracts with facilities located in Italy.

It is our intention to establish Bergio as a holding company for the purpose of acquiring established jewelry design and manufacturing firms who possess branded product lines. Branded product lines are products and/or collections whereby the jewelry manufacturers have established their products within the industry through advertising in consumer and trade magazines as well as possibly obtaining federally registered trademarks of their products and collections. This is in line with our strategy and belief that a brand name can create an association with innovation, design and quality which helps add value to the individual products as well as facilitate the introduction of new products.

We intend to acquire design and manufacturing firms throughout the United States and Europe. We intend to locate potential candidates through our relationships in the industry. However, as of the date of this report, we do not have any binding agreements with any potential acquisition candidates.

Crown Luxe was incorporated in the State of Delaware on March 5, 2014 in order to operate the Company’s first retail store located in Bergen County, New Jersey, which opened in the fourth quarter of 2014. We intend to provide another area for growth by establishing a retail outlet for the Company’s products.

On June 1, 2015, the Company acquired a 51% interest in R.S. Fisher, Inc., a Delaware corporation, in exchange for funding the company’s operations.  The minority shareholder contributed jewelry molds and inventory valued at $349,292. The Company discontinued its business with RS Fisher, effective January 1, 2017, and wrote-off the assets as of December 31, 2016. During 2017 the Company sold its interest in RS Fisher for $20, 527 in cash and reversed the remaining balance sheet items netting to $27,953 for a total gain on sale of asset of $48,480.

Considering the sluggish economy and the slowdown in the jewelry market, the Company has been carefully managing its expenses in order to better match its revenues until such time as the opportunities we are currently exploring generate an increase in revenues. However, there can be no assurance that the jewelry market will turn around or that we will be profitable.

The Company has instituted various cost saving measures to conserve cash and has worked with its debtors in an attempt to negotiate the debt terms. The Company has been also investigating various strategies to increase sales and expand its business. The Company is in negotiations with some potential partners, but, at this time, there is nothing concrete, but the Company remains positive about its prospects. However, there is no assurance that the Company will be successful in its endeavors or that it will be able to increase sales.

Our future operations are contingent upon increasing revenues and raising capital for on-going operations and expansion of our product lines. Because we have a limited operating history, you may have difficulty evaluating our business and future prospects.

Results of Operations - For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2016

15

Table of Contents

Sales

Net sales for year ended December 31, 2017 increased $78,573 (14.1%) to $635,948, as compared to $557,375 for the year ended December 31, 2016. This increase is primarily attributed to an increase in retail sales as well as in increase in wholesale sales from its retail store offset partially by reduction sales from RS Fisher. The Company intends to concentrate on its domestic operations and explore additional opportunities to expand its business. However, there has been a general slowdown in the market for the Company’s products and the jewelry industry as a whole.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased $37,432 (24.4%) to $191,036 as compared to $153,604 for the year ended December 31, 2016. This increase in gross profit is primarily due to the increase in sales.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Total selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $220,842 (32.2%) to $464,595 for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to $685,437 for the year ended December 31, 2017. This decrease is mostly a result of cost reduction measures and lower expenses attributed to the R.S. Fisher operations which has been sold.

Impairment Loss on Assets

The Company had an impairment loss on assets in the amount of $258,457 for the year ended December 31, 2016 associated with the assets of RS Fisher and Company. The Company did not have this expense in 2017.

Loss from Operations

As a result of the above, the Company reduced its loss from operations to $273,599 for the year ended December 31, 2017 as compared to $790,290 for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Other Expense

For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company had other income of $73,774 as compared to other income of $46,220 for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase in in gains on the extinguishment of debt and the sale of an asset was offset mostly by the lower gain on the change in the fair value of the derivatives and the increase in interest expense.

Net Loss

As a result of the above, the Company reduced its loss for the year ended December 31, 2017 to $199,785 as compared to a net loss of $744,070 for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following table summarizes total current assets, liabilities and working capital at December 31, 2017, compared to December 31, 2016.

16

Table of Contents

Our working capital deficiency decreased $110,880. This improvement is primarily attributed repayment of stockholder’s loans and conversion of debt to equity partially offset by the increase in deferred compensation.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company had a net increase in cash of $59. The Company’s principal sources and uses of funds were as follows:

Cash used in operating activities.  For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company provided $93,880 in cash for operations as compared to using $3,808 in cash for the year ended December 31, 2016. This increase in cash used in operations is primarily attributed to the lower operating loss.

Cash used in investing activities. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company provided $20,527 from investing activities as compared to using $1,150 for the year ended December 31, 2016. This increase is due to the cash received from the sale of RS Fisher in the amount of $20,527.

Cash provided by (used in) financing activities. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company used $114,348 in financing activities as compared to providing $23,943 from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016. This decrease is primarily the result of loan to stockholder..

Our indebtedness is comprised of various bank credit lines, convertible debt, advances from a stockholder/officer and credit cards intended to provide capital for the ongoing manufacturing of our jewelry line, in advance of receipt of the payment from our retail distributors.  

Bank Lines of Credit

We currently have a $175,000 bank line of credit agreement with Columbia Bank. Interest is at the bank’s prime rate plus 1.75% with a minimum rate of 5.75%. The line is collateralized by our assets as well as a personal guarantee by our Chief Executive Officer, Berge Abajian.  As of December 31, 2017, the outstanding balance due to Columbia Bank was $170,000.

We have a number of various unsecured credit card obligations.  These obligations require minimal monthly payments of interest and principal and as of December 31, 2017, have interest rates ranging from 3.99% to 15.90%.  As of December 31, 2017, we have outstanding balances related to these obligations of $168,555.

Convertible Debt

The Company enters into certain financing agreements for convertible debt. For the most part, the Company settles these obligations with the Company’s common stock.  As of December 31, 2017, the Company had outstanding convertible debt in the amount of $437,781.

Satisfaction of Our Cash Obligations for the Next 12 Months

A critical component of our operating plan impacting our continued existence is to efficiently manage the production of our jewelry lines and successfully develop new lines through our Company or through possible acquisitions and/or mergers. Our ability to obtain capital through additional equity and/or debt financing, and joint venture partnerships will also be important to our expansion plans. In the event we experience any significant problems assimilating acquired assets into our operations or cannot obtain the necessary capital to pursue our strategic plan, we may have to reduce the growth of our operations. This may materially impact our ability to increase revenue and continue our growth.

Over the next twelve months we believe that our existing capital combined with available borrowing from the agreement with Illiad, our lines of credit and anticipated cash flow from operations will be sufficient to sustain our current operations. Additionally, our major stockholder has agreed to continue, from time to time as needed, to advance funds under similar terms as his current advances. It is anticipated that we will need to sell additional equity and/or debt securities in the event we locate potential mergers and/or acquisitions. There can be no assurance that if additional funding is required we will be able to secure it on terms that are favorable to us or at all.

17

Table of Contents

Research and Development

We are not anticipating significant research and development expenditures in the near future.

Expected Purchase or Sale of Plant and Significant Equipment

We do not anticipate the purchase or sale of any plant or significant equipment; as such items are not required by us at this time.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company prepares its financial statements in accordance with GAAP. In preparing the financial statements and accounting for the underlying transactions and balances, the Company applies its accounting policies as disclosed in Note 2 of our Notes to Financial Statements.  The Company’s accounting policies that require a higher degree of judgment and complexity used in the preparation of financial statements include:

Revenue Recognition - the Company’s management recognizes revenue when realized or realizable and earned.  In connection with revenue, the Company established a sales return and allowance reserve for anticipated merchandise to be returned based on historical operations.  The Company’s sole revenue producing activity as a manufacturer and distributor of upscale jewelry is affected by movement in fashion trends and customer desire for new designs, varying economic conditions affecting consumer spending and changing product demand by retailers affecting their desired inventory levels. Realizing that this may, and in some periods has, resulted in a significant amount of sales returns, management revised the Company policy of accepting merchandise returns.  Whereas under prior policy customers had up to 360 days to return merchandise and were allowed credits as offsets to their outstanding accounts receivable, under the current return policy merchandise, with limited exceptions, cannot be returned.

Accounts receivable - the Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits based on customer payment and current credit worthiness, as determined by review of their current credit information.  The Company continuously monitors credits and payments from its customers and maintains provision for estimated credit losses based on its historical experience and any specific customer issues that have been identified. While such credit losses have historically been within our expectation and the provision established, the Company cannot guarantee that it will continue to receive positive results. Management has provided an allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately $76,227 at December 31, 201-75 and $95,587 at December 31, 2016.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments - The Company follows guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) on “Fair Value Measurements” for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.  This guidance establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to existing generally accepted accounting principles that require the use of fair value measurements, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements.

The FASB defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  Additionally, the FASB requires the use of valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

These inputs are prioritized below:

·

Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

·

Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

·

Level 3: Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the use of the reporting entity’s own assumptions.

18

Table of Contents

The Company discloses the estimated fair value for all financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. As of December 31, 2017, the fair value of short-term financial instruments including accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximates book value due to their short-term maturity.  The fair value of property and equipment is estimated to approximate its net book value.  The fair value of debt obligations, other than convertible debt obligations, approximates their face values due to their short-term maturities and/or the variable rates of interest associated with the underlying obligations.

Income taxes - deferred tax assets arise from a variety of sources, the most significant being: a) tax losses that can be carried forward to be utilized against profits in future years; b) expenses recognized in the books but disallowed in the tax return until the associated cash flow occurs; and c) valuation changes of assets which need to be tax effected for book purposes but are deductible only when the valuation change is realized.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when such differences are expected to reverse.  The measurement of deferred tax assets is reduced, if necessary, by a valuation allowance for any tax benefit which is not more likely than not to be realized. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, future taxable income is estimated, considering the realization of tax loss carryforwards. Valuation allowances related to deferred tax assets can also be affected by changes to tax laws, changes to statutory tax rates and future taxable income levels. In the event it was determined that the Company would not be able to realize all or a portion of its deferred tax assets in the future, the Company would reduce such amounts through a charge to income in the period in which that determination is made. Conversely, if it were determined that it would be able to realize the deferred tax assets in the future in excess of the net carrying amounts, the Company would decrease the recorded valuation  allowance through an increase to income in the period in which that determination is made.  In its evaluation of a valuation allowance, the Company takes into account existing contracts and backlog, and the probability that options under these contract awards will be exercised as well as sales of existing products. The Company prepares profit projections based on the revenue and expenses forecast to determine that such revenues will produce sufficient taxable income to realize the deferred tax assets.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company is not party to any off-balance sheet arrangements that may affect its financial position or its results of operations.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting.” This ASU provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting. The amendments should be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. For public business entities, this update is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating whether this ASU will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 (“Leases”), which introduces the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under previous guidance. The new standard establishes a right-of-use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to record an ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this ASU will increase assets and liabilities for operating leases. The Company is evaluating the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, which is an update to Topic 740, “Income Taxes”. This update requires that all deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as non-current. The Company adopted this update. The adoption of this update did not have any impact on the Company’s results of operations.

19

Table of Contents

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern to provide guidance about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The guidance requires management to assess whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. When management identifies such conditions or events, a footnote disclosure is required to disclose their nature, as well as management’s plans to alleviate the substantial doubt to continue as a going concern. The standard became effective for our fiscal year end 2017.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 that introduces a new five-step revenue recognition model in which an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This ASU also requires disclosures sufficient to enable users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers, including qualitative and quantitative disclosures about contracts with customers, significant judgments and changes in judgments, and assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08 which further clarifies the guidance on the principal versus agent considerations within ASU 2014-09. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10 to expand the guidance on identifying performance obligations and licensing within ASU 2014-09. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12 to improve revenue recognition in the areas of collectability, presentation of sales tax and other similar taxes collected from customers, noncash consideration, contract modifications and completed contracts at transition. This update also amends the disclosure requirements within ASU 2014-09 for entities that retrospectively apply the guidance. The latest amendments are intended to address implementation issues that were raised by stakeholders and discussed by the Revenue Recognition Transition Resource Group, and provide additional practical expedients. These standards are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is assessing their implementation process and the potential impact on its existing revenue accounting policies and newly required financial statement disclosures. The Company has not yet determined the impact from the adoption of the new standard on either its financial position or results of operations.

No other recently issued accounting pronouncements had or are expected to have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Table of Contents

BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Table of Contents

BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Table of Contents

BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Table of Contents

BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Table of Contents

BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation:

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and include the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates:

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires that management make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.  

Risks and Uncertainties:

The Company’s operations are subject to a number of risks, including but not limited to changes in the general economy, demand for the Company’s products, and the success of its customers.

Revenue Recognition:

Revenues are recognized at the time of shipment to with the price to the buyer being fixed and determinable and collectability assured, provided title and risk of loss is transferred to the customer.  Provisions, when appropriate, are made where the right to return exists.

Shipping and handling costs charged to customers are classified as sales, and the shipping and handling costs incurred are included in cost of sales.

Non-controlling Interest:

Non-controlling interest represents third party ownership in the net assets of our consolidated subsidiaries. For financial reporting purposes, the assets and liabilities of our majority owned subsidiaries are consolidated with those of our own, with any third party investor’s interest shown as non-controlling interest.

On June 1, 2015, the Company acquired a 51% interest in R.S. Fisher, Inc., a Delaware corporation, in exchange for funding the Company’s operations.  The minority holder contributed jewelry molds and inventory valued at $349,292.

As of September 30, 2017, the Company sold its 51% interest in R.S. Fisher.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments:

The Company estimates that the fair value of all financial instruments at December 31, 2017 and, 2016, as defined in FASB ASC 825 “Financial Instruments”, does not differ materially, except for the items discussed below, from the aggregate carrying values of its financial instruments recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The estimated fair value amounts have been determined by the Company using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data to develop the estimates of fair value.

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 for cash, accounts receivable, inventories and accounts payable and loans payable approximate the fair value because of the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments.  Each reporting period we evaluate market conditions including available interest rates, credit spreads relative to our credit rating and liquidity in estimating the fair value of our debt. After considering such market conditions, we estimate that the fair value of debt approximates its carrying value.

F-6

Table of Contents

BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Accounting for Income Taxes:

The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method described in FASB ASC 740, “Income Taxes”. Deferred tax assets arise from a variety of sources, the most significant being: a) tax losses that can be carried forward to be utilized against profits in future years; b) expenses recognized for financial reporting purposes but disallowed in the tax return until the associated cash flow occurs; and c) valuation changes of assets which need to be tax effected for book purposes but are deductible only when the valuation change is realized.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when such differences are expected to reverse.  The measurement of deferred tax assets is reduced, if necessary, by a valuation allowance for any tax benefit which is not more likely than not to be realized. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, future taxable income is estimated, considering the realization of tax loss carryforwards. Valuation allowances related to deferred tax assets can also be affected by changes to tax laws, changes to statutory tax rates and future taxable income levels. In the event it was determined that the Company would not be able to realize all or a portion of our deferred tax assets in the future, we would reduce such amounts through a charge to income in the period in which that determination is made. Conversely, if we were to determine that we would be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the future in excess of the net carrying amounts, we would decrease the recorded valuation allowance through an increase to income in the period in which that determination is made.

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Income Tax Uncertainties:

The Company accounts for uncertainties in income taxes under ASC 740-10-50 which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. ASC 740-10 requires that the Company determine whether the benefits of its tax positions are more-likely-than-not of being sustained upon audit based on the technical merits of the tax position. The Company recognizes the impact of an uncertain income tax position taken on its income tax return at the largest amount that is more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon audit by the relevant taxing authority. The implementation of ASC 740-10 had no impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

Despite the Company’s belief that its tax return positions are consistent with applicable tax laws, one or more positions may be challenged by taxing authorities. Settlement of any challenge can result in no change, a complete disallowance, or some partial adjustment reached through negotiations or litigation.

Interest and penalties related to income tax matters, if applicable, will be recognized as income tax expense. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company did not incur any expense related to interest or penalties for income tax matters, and no such amounts were accrued as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Cash and Cash Equivalents:

Cash equivalents are comprised of certain highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. The Company did not have any cash equivalents on hand at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

F-7

Table of Contents

BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Accounts Receivable:

Accounts receivable are generated from sales of fine jewelry to retail outlets throughout the United States. At December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, accounts receivable were substantially comprised of balances due from retailers.

The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits based on customer payment and current credit worthiness, as determined by review of their current credit information.  The Company continuously monitors credit limits for and payments from its customers and maintains provision for estimated credit losses based on its historical experience and any specific customer issues that have been identified.  While such credit losses have historically been within the Company’s expectation and the provision established, the Company cannot guarantee that this will continue.

An allowance for doubtful accounts is provided against accounts receivable for amounts management believes may be uncollectible. The Company determines the adequacy of this allowance by regularly reviewing the composition of its accounts receivable aging and evaluating individual customer receivables, considering the customer’s financial condition, credit history and current economic circumstance. The Company historically has been able to collect the accounts receivable balance during a period of nine months to a year. While credit losses have historically been within the Company’s expectation and the provision established, the Company cannot guarantee that this will continue. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the allowance for doubtful accounts was $76,227 and $95,587, respectively.

Concentrations of Credit Risk:

Cash Held in Banks: The Company maintains cash balances at a financial institution that is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to federally insured limits. At times balances may exceed FDIC insured limits. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.

Accounts Receivable: The Company’s customer base is primarily comprised of balances due from retailers. Concentrations of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable is limited due to the wide variety of customers and markets into which the Company’s services are provided, as well as their dispersion across many different geographical areas.  The Company has been expanding its brand into retail stores, and opened its first retail store in the fourth quarter of 2014. These sales come with a lower degree of credit risk as these sales are made by cash or credit card. As is characteristic of the Company’s business and of the jewelry industry generally, the Company extends its customers seasonal credit terms.  The carrying amount of receivables approximates fair value. The Company routinely assesses the financial strength of its customers and believes its credit risk exposure on accounts receivable is limited. Based on management’s review of accounts receivable, an allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded, if appropriate. The Company does not require collateral to support these financial instruments.

Inventories:

Inventories consist primarily of finished goods, and are stated at the lower of cost or market.  Cost is determined using the weighted average method, and average cost is recomputed after each inventory purchase or sale.  Inventories are written down if the estimated net realizable value is less than the recorded value, if appropriate. The Company reviews the carrying cost of inventories by product to determine the adequacy of reserves for obsolescence. In accounting for inventories, the Company must make estimates regarding the estimated realizable value of inventory. The estimate is based, in part, on the Company’s forecasts of future sales and age of inventory.

F-8

Table of Contents

BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Property and Equipment:

Equipment is stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Depreciation and amortization are provided on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from 5 to 10 years.

Leasehold improvements are amortized over the term of the lease or the useful life of the asset, whichever is shorter.

Maintenance, repairs, and renewals that do not materially add to the value of the equipment nor appreciably prolong its life are charged to expense as incurred.

When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and the resulting gain or loss is included in the Statement of Operations.

Long-Lived Assets:

The Company assesses the recoverability of the carrying value of its long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future, undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by an asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company recognized an impairment loss of $258,457. No impairment loss was recognized for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliates:

The Company owns less than 20% or otherwise does not exercise significant influence, are stated at cost. At December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had an investment in which the Company owned less than 1% interest in an unconsolidated affiliate and therefore the investment is carried at cost.

Deferred Financing Costs:

Certain costs associated with financing activities related to the issuance of equity securities are deferred. These costs consist primarily of legal, banking and other professional fees related to the transactions. Deferred financing costs are amortized over the life of the related debt.

Equity-Based Compensation:

The Company accounts for equity based compensation transactions with employees under the provisions of ASC Topic No. 718, “Compensation: Stock Compensation” (“Topic No. 718”). Topic No. 718 requires the recognition of the fair value of equity-based compensation in net income. The fair value of common stock issued for compensation is measured at the market price on the date of grant. The fair value of the Company’s equity instruments, other than common stocks, is estimated using a Black-Scholes option valuation model. This model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions and elections including expected stock price volatility and the estimated life of each award. In addition, the calculation of equity-based compensation costs requires that the Company estimate the number of awards that will be forfeited during the vesting period. The fair value of equity-based awards granted to employees is amortized over the vesting period of the award and the Company elected to use the straight-line method for awards granted after the adoption of Topic No. 718.

The Company accounts for equity based transactions with non-employees under the provisions of ASC Topic No. 505-50, “Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees” (“Topic No. 505-50”). Topic No. 505-50 establishes that equity-based payment transactions with non-employees shall be measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The fair value of common stock issued for payments to non-employees is measured at the market price on the date of grant. The fair value of equity instruments, other than common stock, is estimated using the Black-Scholes option valuation model. In general, the Company recognizes an asset or expense in the same manner as if it was to pay cash for the goods or services instead of paying with or using the equity instrument.

F-9

Table of Contents

BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Net (Loss) Income per Common Share:

Basic net (loss) income per share attributable to common stockholders is computed by dividing net (loss) income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period.  Diluted income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, including common stock equivalents, such as stock options and warrants using the treasury stock method.  Diluted loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period and excludes the anti-dilutive effects of common stock equivalents.

New Accounting Pronouncements:

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting.” This ASU provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting. The amendments should be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. For public business entities, this update is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating whether this ASU will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 (“Leases”), which introduces the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under previous guidance. The new standard establishes a right-of-use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to record an ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this ASU will increase assets and liabilities for operating leases. The Company is evaluating the impact that the adoption of this standard will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, which is an update to Topic 740, “Income Taxes”. This update requires that all deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as non-current. The Company adopted this update. The adoption of this update did not have any impact on the Company’s results of operations.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern to provide guidance about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The guidance requires management to assess whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. When management identifies such conditions or events, a footnote disclosure is required to disclose their nature, as well as management’s plans to alleviate the substantial doubt to continue as a going concern. The standard became effective for our fiscal year end 2017.

F-10

Table of Contents

BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

New Accounting Pronouncements (continued):

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 that introduces a new five-step revenue recognition model in which an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This ASU also requires disclosures sufficient to enable users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers, including qualitative and quantitative disclosures about contracts with customers, significant judgments and changes in judgments, and assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08 which further clarifies the guidance on the principal versus agent considerations within ASU 2014-09. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10 to expand the guidance on identifying performance obligations and licensing within ASU 2014-09. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12 to improve revenue recognition in the areas of collectability, presentation of sales tax and other similar taxes collected from customers, noncash consideration, contract modifications and completed contracts at transition. This update also amends the disclosure requirements within ASU 2014-09 for entities that retrospectively apply the guidance. The latest amendments are intended to address implementation issues that were raised by stakeholders and discussed by the Revenue Recognition Transition Resource Group, and provide additional practical expedients. These standards are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is assessing their implementation process and the potential impact on its existing revenue accounting policies and newly required financial statement disclosures. The Company has not yet determined the impact from the adoption of the new standard on either its financial position or results of operations.

No other recently issued accounting pronouncements had or are expected to have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

Subsequent Events:

The Company evaluated subsequent events, which are events or transactions that occurred after December 31, 2017 through the issuance of the accompanying financial statements.

Note 3. Basic and Diluted Income (Loss) Per Share

Net loss per share has been computed according to FASB ASC 260, “Earnings per Share,” which requires a dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share (“EPS”). Basic EPS represents net loss divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during a reporting period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities, including warrants and options, were converted into common stock. The dilutive effect of outstanding warrants, options, and/or conversions is reflected in earnings per share by use of the treasury stock method. In applying the treasury stock method for stock-based compensation arrangements, the assumed proceeds are computed as the sum of the amount the employee must pay upon exercise. For the years ended December 31. 2017 and 2016, basic net loss per share equaled the diluted loss per share, since the effect of shares potentially issuable upon exercise or conversion was anti-dilutive.  For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, 6,431,347,619 and 569,283,333 shares, respectively, issuable upon the conversion of convertible debt were not included in the computation of diluted net loss because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

F-11

Table of Contents

BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note 3. Basic and Diluted Income (Loss) Per Share (continued)

Note 4. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consists of the following:

Depreciation and amortization expense related to the assets above for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $103,438 and $143,922, respectively. In addition, for the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company had an impairment loss on assets in the amount of $258,457.

Note 5. Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities consist of the following:

F-12

Table of Contents

BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note 6. Related Party

Advances from Principal Executive Officer and Accrued Interest

The Company receives periodic advances from its principal executive officer based upon the Company’s cash flow needs. At December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, $133,781 and $242,130, respectively, was due to such officer, including accrued interest.  Interest expense is accrued at an average annual market rate of interest which was 4.5% and 3.5% at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.  Interest expense due to such officer was $24,431 and $18,345 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Accrued interest was $104,601 and $79,937 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  No terms for repayment have been established. As a result, the amount is classified as a current liability.

Effective February 28, 2010, the Company entered into an employment agreement with its CEO.  The agreement, which is for a five year term, provides for an initial base salary of $175,000 per year with a 3% annual increase thereafter (the “Base Salary”). The CEO is also entitled to certain bonuses based on net profits before taxes and other customary benefits, as defined in the agreement. In addition, since it is understood that the Company is employing the CEO during a time of economic decline throughout the U.S. and at times and from time to time, the Company may not be in a position to pay the full amount of Base Salary owed the CEO it is understood and agreed to by the Board, that as long as the Company is unable to pay the CEO the full amount of his Base Salary that the Board shall issue to him, from time to time, an amount of shares that will allow him to remain in possession of fifty-one percent (51%) of the Company’s then outstanding shares of common stock.  Such issuances shall be made to the CEO at any time when his total share holdings are reduced to an amount less than fifty-one percent (51%) as a result of issuance of shares of common stock made on behalf of the Company.

Effective September 1, 2011, the Company and CEO entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (the “Amended Agreement”) which primarily retains the term and compensation of the original agreement. The Amended Agreement, however, removes the section which previously provided for the issuance of Company common stock to the CEO, from time to time, when the Company is unable to pay the CEO the full amount of his Base Salary (as defined in the Amended Agreement) which would allow the CEO to maintain a fifty-one percent (51%) share of the Company’s outstanding common stock.  However, the CEO does have the right to request all or a portion of his unpaid Base Salary be paid with the Company’s restricted common stock. In addition, the Amended Agreement provides for the issuance of 51 shares of newly authorized Series A Preferred Stock to be issued to the CEO. As defined in the Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of the Series A Preferred Stock, each share of Series A Preferred Stock has voting rights such that the holder of 51 shares of Series A Preferred Stock will effectively maintain majority voting control of the Company. Effective November 3, 2011, the CEO notified the Company that for the one year period, retroactive from April 1, 2011, through December 31, 2012, he would reduce his Base Salary to $100,000. The reduction in base compensation was subsequently extended to December 31, 2013. The CEO is currently deferring his salary to conserve cash. Deferred wages due to the CEO amounted to $628,309 and $453,309 for the periods ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

The Company is in process of extending this agreement.

F-13

Table of Contents

BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note 7. Bank Lines of Credit

A summary of the Company’s credit facilities is as follows:

The Company’s CEO also serves as a guarantor of the Company’s debt.

Note 8. Convertible Debt

Fife, Typenex and Iliad

In December 2012, the Company entered into a $325,000 convertible note with Fife consisting of three tranches to be drawn down with the first tranche totaling $125,000, including $25,000 in loan costs and additional two tranches totaling $200,000. The note bears a 5% annual interest rate and matures eighteen months from the date of issuance. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock based on 70% of the average of the three lowest closing prices of the common stock for the proceeding 15 consecutive trading days immediately prior to the conversion. During 2013, the conversion price was fixed at $0.005 per share. As of December 31, 2012, the Company only drew down the first tranche totaling $125,000. On February 11, 2013, April 5, 2013, April 23, 2013, and July 1, 2013, the Company drew down an additional $250,000.  

On June 5, 2014, the Company, Fife, Typenex and Iliad Research and Trading, LLP (“Iliad”) entered into an Assignment and Assumption Agreement and Note Purchase Agreement (the “Note Purchase Agreement”) whereby Iliad acquired all of Fife’s and Typenex’s right, title, obligations and interest in, to and arising under the Company Notes (as defined in the Note Purchase Agreement) and the Note Purchase Documents (as defined in the Note Purchase Agreement).

On October 17, 2014, the Company entered into a financing arrangement with Iliad to provide additional financing in the amount of up to $450,000 through the issuance of a Secured Convertible Promissory Note (the “Note”). The Company agreed to cover Iliad’s legal, accounting and other related fees in the amount of $5,000, which is included in the principal balance of the Note. The Note will accrue interest at the rate of 8% per annum until the Note is paid in full. Monies are to be drawn in eight tranches with the initial tranche in the amount of $105,000, and the remaining balance of $350,000 in seven tranches of $50,000 each. The Company drew down the initial tranche on October 17, 2014. The Note had a maturity date of July 17, 2016 and the Company is negotiating with the lender.

Beginning six months after October 17, 2014 and on the same day each month thereafter, the Company shall make an installment payment, based upon the unpaid balance. At the option of the Company, payments may be made in cash or by converting the installment amount into shares of the Company’s common stock. The conversion price is equal to the lesser of (i) $0.0005 per share and (ii) 67.5% of the average of the three lowest closing bid prices in the 15 trading days immediately preceding the conversion. The Company has the right to prepay the Note at 135% of the outstanding balance at the time of prepayment. During the year ended December 31, 2017, principal of $63,483 and accrued interest of $5,911 was converted into 1,020,392,460 shares of common stock. During the year ended December 31, 2016, principal of $2,391 and accrued interest of $19,487 was converted into 395,271,000 shares of common stock.  The outstanding balances at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were $34,126 and $97,609, respectively with accrued interest of $604 and $653 at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

F-14

Table of Contents

BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note 8. Convertible Debt (continued)

Fife, Typenex and Iliad (continued)

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company drew down an additional $314,703. During the year ended December 31, 2017, there were no conversions. During the year ended December 31, 2016, principal of $3,297 and accrued interest of $19,487 was converted into 395,271,000 shares of common stock. The outstanding balances at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were $329,175 and $329,175 respectively, with accrued interest of $71,015 and $39,831 at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

Third Party Note

In November 2014, the Company converted a portion of its outstanding accounts payable for legal services to a third party into two convertible promissory notes in the aggregate amount of $63,275. These are demand notes and accrue interest at the rate of 10% on the outstanding balance.  The notes are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock based on 65% of the average ten trading days closing bid price during the preceding ten consecutive trading days immediately prior to the conversion. During the year ended December 31, 2017, principal of $22,672 was converted into 398,205,370 shares of common stock. During the year ended December 31, 2017, principal of $26,461 was converted into 437,252,477 shares of common stock. The outstanding balances at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were $-0- and $22,672, respectively, with accrued interest of $-0-and $9,000 at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

On April 7, 2015, the convertible promissory notes and accrued interest were assigned to Carebourn Capital L.P. (“Carebourn Capital”). All terms and conditions remained the same, except that notes are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock equal to 50% of the average ten trading days closing bid price during the preceding ten consecutive trading days immediately prior to the conversion.

KBM Worldwide

On February 4 2015, the Company entered into an 8% convertible note in the amount of $54,000 with KBM Worldwide, Inc. (“KBM Worldwide”). The principal and accrued interest is payable on or before November 6, 2015. At the option of the Company, but not before six months from the date of issuance, the holder may elect to convert all or part of such note into the Company’s common stock. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of 60% of the average of the three lowest trading prices during the 10 days prior to the date of conversion or $0.00009, whichever is greater. During the year ended December 31, 2017, principal of $37,110 and accrued interest 0f $20,295 was converted into 637,833,332 shares of common stock. During the year ended December 31, 2016 $670 of principal and $40 of interest was converted into 11,833,333 shares of common stock. The outstanding balances at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were $3,480 and $40,590, respectively, with accrued interest of $9,721 and $6,913 at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

F-15

Table of Contents

BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note 8. Convertible Debt (continued)

Vis Vires Group, Inc.

On March 11, 2015, the Company entered into an 8% convertible note in the amount of $38,000 with Vis Vires Group, Inc.  (“Vis Vires”). The principal and accrued interest is payable on or before November 6, 2015. At the option of the Company, but not before six months from the date of issuance, the holder may elect to convert all or part of the convertible into the Company’s common stock. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 60% of the average of the three lowest trading prices during the 10 days prior to the date of conversion or $0.00009, whichever is greater. There were no conversions during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. The outstanding balance at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $38,000 with accrued interest of $8,622 and $5,582 at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. The Company is currently negotiating an extension to this note.

On April 30, 2015, the Company entered into an 8% convertible note in the amount of $33,000 with Vis Vires. The principal and accrued interest is payable on or before November 6, 2015. At the option of the Company, but not before six months from the date of issuance, the holder may elect to convert all or part of the convertible into the Company’s common stock. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 60% of the average of the three lowest trading prices during the 10 days prior to the date of conversion or $0.00009, whichever is greater. There were no conversions during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. The outstanding balance at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $33,000 with accrued interest of $7,004 and $4,364 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company is currently negotiating an extension to this note.

LG Capital Funding, LLC

On May 4, 2015, the Company entered into an 8% convertible note in the amount of $36,750 with LG Capital Funding, LLC (“LG Capital”). The principal and accrued interest is payable on or before May 4, 2016. The holder, at its option, may elect to convert all or part of the convertible into the Company’s common stock. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to 60% of the lowest trading prices during the 20 days prior to the date of conversion. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company the remaining principal balance of $36,440 and accrued interest was converted into 647,217,161 shares of common stock. The outstanding balances at December 31, 2017 were $-0- and $-0-, respectively, with accrued interest of $-0- and $-0- at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively/

JMJ Financial

On April 15 2015, the Company entered into a $250,000 convertible note with JMJ Financial. The consideration was $225,000 and $25,000 original issue discount.  The principal and accrued interest is payable on or before May 4, 2016. On April 15, 2015, the Company borrowed $25,000 of this amount. The holder, at its option, may elect to convert all or part of the convertible into the Company’s common stock. The note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a price equal to the lesser of $0.018 per share or 60% of the lowest trading price during the 25 days prior to the date of conversion. During the year ended December 31, 2017, principal of $16,713 and accrued interest of $3,484 was converted into 276,000,000 shares of common stock.  During the year ended December 31, 2016, principal of $15,549 was converted into 333,662,200 shares of common stock. The outstanding balances at December 31, 2017 and 2016 were $-0- and $13,229, respectively, with accrued interest of $-0- and $3,761 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, total convertible debt was $437,781 and $574,275, respectively, net of debt discount of $-0- and $9,489, respectively.

F-16

Table of Contents

BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note 9. Derivative Liability

The Company accounts for the fair value of the conversion features of its convertible debt in accordance with ASC Topic No. 815-15 “Derivatives and Hedging; Embedded Derivatives” (“Topic No. 815-15”). Topic No. 815-15 requires the Company to bifurcate and separately account for the conversion features as an embedded derivative contained in the Company’s convertible debt. The Company is required to carry the embedded derivative on its balance sheet at fair value and account for any unrealized change in fair value as a component of results of operations. The Company values the embedded derivatives using the Black-Scholes pricing model. Amortization of debt discount amounted to $-0- and $9,489 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  The derivative liability is revalued each reporting period using the Black-Scholes model. As of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the derivative liability was $-0- and $13,299, respectively.

As of December 31, 2017, the Company had no derivative liabilities.

Note 10. Stockholders’ Equity

The Company is authorized to issue 6,000,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.00001 per share and 51 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.00001 per share. At December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were 4,622,047,391 and 1,836,846,849 common shares issued and outstanding, respectively. On April 3, 2014, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware to reduce the par value of all shares of common stock and preferred stock from $0.001 to $0.00001 per share.  On February 26, 2014, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware to increase the number of authorized shares of capital stock of the Company to 6,000,000,000 shares. Effective on October 14, 2014, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation to effectuate a 1-for-1,000 reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock. All share and per share data has been adjusted to reflect such stock splits and change in par value. Effective September 1, 2011, the Company authorized and issued 51 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 to its CEO. In April 2014, the Company changed its par value on its preferred stock from $0.001 to $0.00001. The Series A Preferred Stock pays no dividends and has no conversion rights. Each share of Series A Preferred Stock has voting rights such that the holder of 51 shares of Series A Preferred Stock will effectively maintain majority voting control of the Company.

For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued the following shares of common stock:

1)

On March 22, 2017, we issued 90,005,478 shares of common stock valued at $4,951 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

2)

On March 22, 2017, we issued 183,000,000 shares of common stock valued at $12,244 to Illiad for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.

3)

On March 22, 2017, we issued 91,600,000 shares of common stock valued at $4,580 to JMJ Financial for conversion of its convertible debt.

4)

On May 12, 2017, we issued 60,000,000 shares of common stock valued at $6,000 to a firm for payment of accounts payable.

5)

On May 12, 2017, we issued 219,000,000 shares of common stock valued at $14,892 to Illiad for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.

6)

On June 30, 2017, we issued 107,871,146 shares of common stock valued at $5,394 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

7)

On October 1, 2017, we issued 210,000,000 shares of common stock valued at $21,000 to View Point Health Investments in exchange for consulting services.

8)

On October 4, 2017, we issued 107,871,146 shares of common stock valued at $6,935 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

F-17

Table of Contents

BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note 10. Stockholders’ Equity (continued)

9)

On October 10, 2017, we issued 92,457,600 shares of common stock valued at $6,935 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

10)

On October 3, 2017, we issued 258,500,000 shares of common stock valued at $17,568 to Illiad for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.

11)

On October 13, 2017, we issued 360.000.000 shares of common stock valued at $24,480 to Illiad for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.

12)

On October 3, 2017, we issued 129,000,000 shares of common stock valued at $6,450 to JMJ Financial for conversion of its convertible debt.

13)

On October 10, 2017, we issued 113,062,200 shares of common stock valued at $5,653 to JMJ Financial for conversion of its convertible debt.

14)

On October 11, 2017, we issued 159,444,444 shares of common stock valued at $14,350 to KBM Financial for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.

15)

On October 12, 2017, we issued 159,500,000 shares of common stock valued at $14,355 to KBM Financial for conversion of its convertible debt.

16)

On October 13, 2017, we issued 159,444.444 shares of common stock valued at $14,350 to KBM Financial for conversion of its convertible debt.

17)

On October 24, 2017, we issued 159,444.444 shares of common stock valued at $14,350 to KBM Financial for conversion of its convertible debt.

18)

On October 26, 2017, we issued 125,000,000 shares of common stock valued at $12,500 to a firm for payment of accounts payable.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued the following shares of common stock:

1)

On January 7, 2016, we issued 3,091,396 shares of common stock valued at $463 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

2)

On January 8, 2016, we issued 3,091,396 shares of common stock valued at $357 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

3)

On January 25, 2016, we issued 3,091,396 shares of common stock valued at $479 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

4)

On February 3, 2016, we issued 3,848,788 shares of common stock valued at $654 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

5)

On February11, 2016, we issued 4,037,379 shares of common stock valued at $646 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

6)

On March 7, 2016, we issued 4,235,210 shares of common stock valued at $635 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company issued the following shares of common stock:

7)

On March 21, 2016, we issued 4,442,736 shares of common stock valued at $600 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

8)

On March 24, 2016, we issued 4,660,430 shares of common stock valued at $629 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

9)

On April 11, 2016, we issued 4,435,767 shares of common stock valued at $643 to Carebourn Capital L.P. (“Carebourn Capital”) for conversion of its convertible debt.

10)

On April 20, 2016, we issued 4,435,767 shares of common stock valued at $577 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

11)

On May 13, 2016, we issued 5,323,496 shares of common stock valued at $719 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

F-18

Table of Contents

BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note 10. Stockholders’ Equity (continued)

12)

On May 20, 2016, we issued 5,584,347 shares of common stock valued at $698 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

13)

On June 2, 2016, we issued 5,857,980 shares of common stock valued at $644 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

14)

On June 8, 2016, we issued 5,857,980 shares of common stock valued at $644 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

15)

On June 14, 2016, we issued 5,857,980 shares of common stock valued at $615 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

16)

On June 22, 2016, we issued 6,844,416 shares of common stock valued at $889 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

17)

On July 1, 2016, we issued 5,857,980 shares of common stock valued at $557 to Carebourn Capital L.P. (“Carebourn Capital”) for conversion of its convertible debt.

18)

On July 26, 2016, we issued 8,870,317 shares of common stock valued at $532 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

19)

On August 5, 2016, we issued 8,870,317 shares of common stock valued at $532 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

20)

On August 11, 2016, we issued 10,660,538 shares of common stock valued at $580 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

21)

On August 23, 2016, we issued 13,346,851 shares of common stock valued at $200 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

22)

On August 26, 2016, we issued 13,346,851 shares of common stock valued at $601 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

23)

On August 31, 2016, we issued 13,346,851 shares of common stock valued at $135 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

24)

On September 13, 2016, we issued 13,346,851 shares of common stock valued at $467 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

25)

On September 14, 2016, we issued 19,530,573 shares of common stock valued at $586 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

26)

On September 22, 2016, we issued 19,530,500 shares of common stock valued at $978 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

27)

On September 27, 2016, we issued 25,161,199 shares of common stock valued at $1,258 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

28)

On September 27, 2016, we issued 25,160,000 shares of common stock valued at $1,258 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

29)

On August 24, 2016, we issued 11,833,333 shares of common stock valued at $710 to KBM Worldwide for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.

30)

On July1, 2016, we issued 7,192,250 shares of common stock valued at $790 to LG Capital Funding for conversion of its convertible debt.

31)

On July7, 2016, we issued 7,556,416 shares of common stock valued at $907 to LG Capital Funding for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.

32)

On July14, 2016, we issued 7,842,416 shares of common stock valued at $941 to LG Capital Funding for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.

33)

On July 19, 2016, we issued 8,608,833 shares of common stock valued at $517 to LG Capital Funding for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.

34)

On August 5, 2016, we issued 18,794,500 shares of common stock valued at $1,128 to LG Capital Funding for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.

35)

On August 9, 2016, we issued 20,607,833 shares of common stock valued at $1,236 to LG Capital Funding for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.

F-19

Table of Contents

BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note 10. Stockholders’ Equity (continued)

36)

On August 22, 2016, we issued 23,554,333 shares of common stock valued at $1,413 to LG Capital Funding for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.

37)

On August 26, 2016, we issued 29,368,333 shares of common stock valued at $1,762 to LG Capital Funding for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.

38)

On August 31, 2016, we issued 31,609,333 shares of common stock valued at $1,897 to LG Capital Funding for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.

39)

On September 13, 2016, we issued 31,413,500 shares of common stock valued at $1,885 to LG Capital Funding for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.

40)

On September 22, 2016, we issued 44,436,166 shares of common stock valued at $2,666 to LG Capital Funding for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.

41)

On October 25, 2016, we issued 34,081,855 shares of common stock valued at $1,704 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

42)

On November 3, 2016, we issued 34,081,800 shares of common stock valued at $1,704 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

43)

On November 8, 2016, we issued 54,386,075 shares of common stock valued at $2,719 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

44)

On November 30, 2016, we issued 69,822,671 shares of common stock valued at $3,491 to Carebourn Capital for conversion of its convertible debt.

45)

On October 18, 2016, we issued 59,132,000 shares of common stock valued at $4,021 to Iliad Research and Trading L.P for payment of accrued interest.

46)

On November 3, 2016, we issued 84,653,000 shares of common stock valued at $5,756 to Iliad Research and Trading L.P for payment of accrued interest.

47)

On November 17, 2016, we issued 84,652,000 shares of common stock valued at $5,756 to Iliad Research and Trading L.P. for payment of accrued interest.

48)

On December 8, 2016, we issued 166,834,000 shares of common stock valued at $6,345 to Iliad Research and Trading L.P. conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.

49)

On October 3, 2016, we issued 28,100,000 shares of common stock valued at $1,686 to JMJ Financial for conversion of its convertible debt.

50)

On October 27, 2016, we issued 34,700,000 shares of common stock valued at $2,082 to JMJ Financial for conversion of its convertible debt.

51)

On October 28, 2016, we issued 38,600,000 shares of common stock valued at $2,316 to JMJ Financial for conversion of its convertible debt.

52)

On November 7, 2016, we issued 48,200,000 shares of common stock valued at $2,410 to JMJ Financial for conversion of its convertible debt.

53)

On November 9, 2016, we issued 55,300,000 shares of common stock valued at $2,500 to JMJ Financial for conversion of its convertible debt.

54)

On November 29, 2016, we issued 71,100,000 shares of common stock valued at $3,555 to JMJ Financial for conversion of its convertible debt.

55)

On November 15, 2016, we issued 120,694,500 shares of common stock valued at $7,242 to LG Capital for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.

56)

On October 10, 2016, we issued 44,501,000 shares of common stock valued at $2,670 to LG Capital for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.

57)

On October 26, 2016, we issued 44,454,666 shares of common stock valued at $2,667 to LG Capital for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.

58)

On November 4, 2016, we issued 95,601,333 shares of common stock valued at $5,736 to LG Capital for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.

59)

On November 29, 2016, we issued 104,137,333 shares of common stock valued at $6,248 to LG Capital for conversion of its convertible debt and accrued interest.

F-20

Table of Contents

BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note 11. Income Taxes

The components of the Company’s deferred taxes at December 31, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:

The recognized deferred tax asset is based upon the expected utilization of its benefit from future taxable income. At December 31, 2016, the Company had approximately $4,651,000 of federal net operating tax loss carryforwards expiring at various dates through 2034. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 enacted a complex set of rules which limits a company's ability to utilize net operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards in periods following an ownership change. These rules define an ownership change as a greater than 50 percent point change in stock ownership within a defined testing period which is generally a three-year period. As a result of stock which may be issued by us from time to time and the conversion of warrants, options or the result of other changes in ownership of our outstanding stock, the Company may experience an ownership change and consequently our utilization of net operating loss carryforwards could be significantly limited.

Based upon the net losses historically incurred and, the prospective global economic conditions, management believes that it is not more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will be realized and has provided a valuation allowance of 100% of the deferred tax asset.

A reconciliation of the income tax (benefit) provision at the statutory Federal tax rate of 34% to the income tax (benefit) provision recognized in the financial statements is as follows:

Note 12. Commitments

The Company leases certain office and manufacturing facilities and equipment. The Company’s office and manufacturing facilities are currently leased on a month to month basis at $1,100 per month.

The Company also leases retail space for its store in Closter, NJ for approximately $1,500 per month.

In addition, the Company has agreements to lease equipment for use in the operations of the business under operating leases.

F-21

Table of Contents

BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note 12. Commitments (continued0

The following is a schedule of approximate future minimum rental payments for operating leases subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2017.

Rent expense for the Company's operating leases for year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 amounted to approximately $30,408 and $34,648, respectively.

Note 13. Litigation

The Company is currently not involved in any litigation that it believes could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. There is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of our company or any of our subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting our company, our common stock, any of our subsidiaries or of our companies or our subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect.

Note 14. Significant Customer Concentrations

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company had one customer that accounted for 9% of total sales. No other no single customer accounted for over 5% or more of our annual sales. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company had no single customer that accounted for over 5% or more of our annual sales.

As of December 31, 2017 accounts receivable, net amounted to only $61,511 and no one customer represented 93% significant amount of this balance. This amount was collected in the first quarter of 2018. As of December 31, 2016 accounts receivable, net amounted to only $5,594 and no one customer represented a significant amount of this balance.

Note 15. Fair Value Measurements

FASB ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements” defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles and prescribes disclosures about fair value measurements.

As defined in ASC 820, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The Company utilizes market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated, or generally unobservable. The Company classifies fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurement).

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy defined by ASC 820 are as follows:

Level 1 - Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. Level 1 primarily consists of financial instruments such as exchange-traded derivatives, marketable securities and listed equities.

F-22

Table of Contents

BERGIO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

Note 15. Fair Value Measurements (continued)

Level 2 - Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. Level 2 includes those financial instruments that are valued using models or other valuation methodologies. These models are primarily industry-standard models that consider various assumptions, including quoted forward prices for commodities, time value, volatility factors, and current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures. Substantially all of these assumptions are observable in the marketplace throughout the full term of the instrument, can be derived from observable data or are supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace. Instruments in this category generally include non-exchange-traded derivatives such as commodity swaps, interest rate swaps, options and collars.

Level 3 - Pricing inputs include significant inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management’s best estimate of fair value.

The valuation techniques that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:

Market approach - Uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities

Income approach - Uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount based on current market expectations about those future amounts, including present value techniques, option-pricing models and excess earnings method

Cost approach - Based on the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement cost)

The carrying value of the Company’s borrowings is a reasonable estimate of its fair value as borrowings under the Company’s credit facility have variable rates that reflect currently available terms and conditions for similar debt.

The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

The following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016. As required by FASB ASC 820, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

In addition, the FASB issued, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.  This guidance expands opportunities to use fair value measurements in financial reporting and permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value.  The Company did not elect the fair value option for any of its qualifying financial instruments.

F-23

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

The Company will continue its assessment on a quarterly basis.  We plan to hire personnel and resources to address these material weaknesses. We believe these issues can be solved with hiring accounting support and plan to do so as soon as we have funds available for this.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.  The Company’s registered public accounting firm was not required to issue an attestation on its internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.  The Company will continue to evaluate the effectiveness of internal controls and procedures on an on-going basis.

c) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting  

There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act) during the year ended December 31, 2017, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

PART III

Table of Contents

Audit Committee

We do not have a separately-designated standing audit committee. The entire Board performs the functions of an audit committee, but no written charter governs the actions of the Board when performing the functions of what would generally be performed by an audit committee. The Board approves the selection of our independent accountants and meets and interacts with the independent accountants to discuss issues related to financial reporting. In addition, the Board reviews the scope and results of the audit with the independent accountants, reviews with management and the independent accountants our annual operating results, considers the adequacy of our internal accounting procedures and considers other auditing and accounting matters including fees to be paid to the independent auditor and the performance of the independent auditor.

Nominating Committee

Our Board does not maintain a nominating committee. As a result, no written charter governs the director nomination process. Our size and the size of our Board, at this time, do not require a separate nominating committee.

When evaluating director nominees, our directors consider the following factors:

·

the appropriate size of our board of directors;

·

our needs with respect to the particular talents and experience of our directors;

·

the knowledge, skills and experience of nominees, including experience in finance, administration or public service, in light of prevailing business conditions and the knowledge, skills and experience already possessed by other members of the Board;

·

experience in political affairs;

·

experience with accounting rules and practices; and

·

the desire to balance the benefit of continuity with the periodic injection of the fresh perspective provided by new Board members.

Our goal is to assemble a Board that brings together a variety of perspectives and skills derived from high quality business and professional experience.

Other than the foregoing, there are no stated minimum criteria for director nominees, although the Board may also consider such other factors as it may deem are in our best interests as well as our stockholders.  In addition, the Board identifies nominees by first evaluating the current members of the Board willing to continue in service. Current members of the Board with skills and experience that are relevant to our business and who are willing to continue in service are considered for re-nomination.  If any member of the Board does not wish to continue in service or if the Board decides not to re-nominate a member for re-election, the Board then identifies the desired skills and experience of a new nominee in light of the criteria above.  Current members of the Board are polled for suggestions as to individuals meeting the criteria described above.  The Board may also engage in research to identify qualified individuals.  To date, we have not engaged third parties to identify or evaluate or assist in identifying potential nominees, although we reserve the right in the future to retain a third party search firm, if necessary.  

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors, executive officers and persons who beneficially own 10% or more of a class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act to file reports of beneficial ownership and changes in beneficial ownership with the SEC. Directors, executive officers and greater than 10% stockholders are required by the rules and regulations of the SEC to furnish the Company with copies of all reports filed by them in compliance with Section 16(a).

Based solely on our review of certain reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the reports required to be filed with respect to transactions in our common stock during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, were timely

24

Table of Contents

Code of Ethics

We do not currently have a code of ethics that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer or Controller, or persons performing similar functions.  Because we have only limited business operations and four officers and directors, we believe a code of ethics would have limited utility.  We intend to adopt such a code of ethics as our business operations expand and we have more directors, officers and employees.

Table of Contents

However, the CEO does have the right to request all or a portion of his unpaid Base Salary be paid with the Company’s restricted common stock. In addition, the Amended Agreement provides for the issuance of 51 shares of newly authorized Series A Preferred Stock to be issued to the CEO. As defined in the Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of the Series A Preferred Stock, each share of Series A Preferred Stock has voting rights such that the holder of 51 shares of Series A Preferred Stock will effectively maintain majority voting control of the Company. Effective November 3, 2011, the CEO notified the Company that for the one year period, retroactive from April 1, 2011, through December 31, 2012, he would reduce his Base Salary to $100,000. The reduction in base compensation was subsequently extended to December 31, 2013. The CEO is currently deferring his salary to conserve cash. Deferred wages due to the CEO amounted to $628,309 and $453,309 for the periods ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

The Company is in process of extending this agreement.

Retirement Benefits

Currently, we do not provide any Company sponsored retirement benefits to any employee, including the named executive officers.

Perquisites

We have historically provided only modest perquisites to our named executive officers. We do not view perquisites as a significant element of our compensation structure, but do believe that perquisites can be useful in attracting, motivating and retaining the executive talent for which we compete. It is expected that our historical practices regarding perquisites will continue and will be subject to periodic review by our by our board of directors.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table presents information regarding compensation of our principal executive officer, and the two most highly compensated executive officers other than the principal executive officer for services rendered during years ended 2017 and 2016, respectively.